<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_08_0057253</id>
	<title>TSA's Sloppy Redacting Reveals All</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1260291780000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>A travel blog breaks the story of a <a href="http://www.wanderingaramean.com/2009/12/tsa-makes-another-stupid-move.html">poor job of redacting by the TSA</a>: they posted a PDF of airport screening policies, with certain sections blacked out &mdash; not realizing that simply laying a black rectangle over the text is hardly sufficient. Cryptome has posted a <a href="http://cryptome.org/tsa-screening.zip">copy with the redaction removed</a> (ZIP).</htmltext>
<tokenext>A travel blog breaks the story of a poor job of redacting by the TSA : they posted a PDF of airport screening policies , with certain sections blacked out    not realizing that simply laying a black rectangle over the text is hardly sufficient .
Cryptome has posted a copy with the redaction removed ( ZIP ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A travel blog breaks the story of a poor job of redacting by the TSA: they posted a PDF of airport screening policies, with certain sections blacked out — not realizing that simply laying a black rectangle over the text is hardly sufficient.
Cryptome has posted a copy with the redaction removed (ZIP).</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364898</id>
	<title>Re:I would love to see Figure J</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1260286320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He is certainly responsible for being an idiot, there are, in fact, less drastic ways to check the status of a gun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He is certainly responsible for being an idiot , there are , in fact , less drastic ways to check the status of a gun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He is certainly responsible for being an idiot, there are, in fact, less drastic ways to check the status of a gun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362298</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362572</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260303540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it's this they're more worried about...</p><blockquote><div><p>An FFDO in possession of an FFDO firearm must be permitted to pass beyond the<br>screening checkpoint without inspection of his or her person and accessible property upon presentation of<br>bona fide credentials and aircraft operator photo ID. FFDOs are required to show only their credentials<br>and aircraft operator ID.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's this they 're more worried about...An FFDO in possession of an FFDO firearm must be permitted to pass beyond thescreening checkpoint without inspection of his or her person and accessible property upon presentation ofbona fide credentials and aircraft operator photo ID .
FFDOs are required to show only their credentialsand aircraft operator ID .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's this they're more worried about...An FFDO in possession of an FFDO firearm must be permitted to pass beyond thescreening checkpoint without inspection of his or her person and accessible property upon presentation ofbona fide credentials and aircraft operator photo ID.
FFDOs are required to show only their credentialsand aircraft operator ID.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362822</id>
	<title>Re:The TSA redacting process</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260264060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The first TSA Agent does check the passports.<br>At least last time I was flying (two months ago) and during the year before that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first TSA Agent does check the passports.At least last time I was flying ( two months ago ) and during the year before that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first TSA Agent does check the passports.At least last time I was flying (two months ago) and during the year before that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361894</id>
	<title>Well, at least the rest don't do this.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260209340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know people who work in the US government. As I understand it, when releasing material that is partially blacked out, in most departments the procedure is to simply black it out on a hard copy and then photocopy the hard copy or scan it if it is to go online. This removes any chance of clever ways of getting the data if there's something about the file format or such that is strange. I don't see why the TSA wouldn't do the same thing. Moreover, isn't the fact that you can do this with PDFs well known? I've even seen it used as a way of covering up spoilers. What were they thinking?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know people who work in the US government .
As I understand it , when releasing material that is partially blacked out , in most departments the procedure is to simply black it out on a hard copy and then photocopy the hard copy or scan it if it is to go online .
This removes any chance of clever ways of getting the data if there 's something about the file format or such that is strange .
I do n't see why the TSA would n't do the same thing .
Moreover , is n't the fact that you can do this with PDFs well known ?
I 've even seen it used as a way of covering up spoilers .
What were they thinking ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know people who work in the US government.
As I understand it, when releasing material that is partially blacked out, in most departments the procedure is to simply black it out on a hard copy and then photocopy the hard copy or scan it if it is to go online.
This removes any chance of clever ways of getting the data if there's something about the file format or such that is strange.
I don't see why the TSA wouldn't do the same thing.
Moreover, isn't the fact that you can do this with PDFs well known?
I've even seen it used as a way of covering up spoilers.
What were they thinking?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30373478</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>Malibee</author>
	<datestamp>1260286020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clear the sloppy attempts at redacting were a ruse--the real intention was to identify persons capable of noticing and publishing this information, or commenting on it. I'm sure all you people poking holes in the TSA security theatre are already on the Watch List and will get extra-strict screening next time you fly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clear the sloppy attempts at redacting were a ruse--the real intention was to identify persons capable of noticing and publishing this information , or commenting on it .
I 'm sure all you people poking holes in the TSA security theatre are already on the Watch List and will get extra-strict screening next time you fly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clear the sloppy attempts at redacting were a ruse--the real intention was to identify persons capable of noticing and publishing this information, or commenting on it.
I'm sure all you people poking holes in the TSA security theatre are already on the Watch List and will get extra-strict screening next time you fly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362004</id>
	<title>why are they so scared about xray monitors?</title>
	<author>SuperBanana</author>
	<datestamp>1260210480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>photographing EDS or ETD monitor screens or emitted images is not permitted. [...] Whenever possible, x-ray machine images must not be visible to the public or press. When physical constraints prevent x-ray images from being fully protected from public viewing, TSOs must ensure no member of the public or press is in a position to observe an x-ray monitor for an extended period of time. Passengers and other unauthorized individuals must not be allowed to view EDS or ETD monitors and screens.</i>

</p><p>Huh.  Now...why would that be?

</p><p>First guess, they don't want the "terrorists" to see how good/bad the x-ray devices are.

</p><p>Second more cynical guess: Xray machines are mostly useless and the TSA doesn't want the public to realize it's a bunch of voodoo?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>photographing EDS or ETD monitor screens or emitted images is not permitted .
[ ... ] Whenever possible , x-ray machine images must not be visible to the public or press .
When physical constraints prevent x-ray images from being fully protected from public viewing , TSOs must ensure no member of the public or press is in a position to observe an x-ray monitor for an extended period of time .
Passengers and other unauthorized individuals must not be allowed to view EDS or ETD monitors and screens .
Huh. Now...why would that be ?
First guess , they do n't want the " terrorists " to see how good/bad the x-ray devices are .
Second more cynical guess : Xray machines are mostly useless and the TSA does n't want the public to realize it 's a bunch of voodoo ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> photographing EDS or ETD monitor screens or emitted images is not permitted.
[...] Whenever possible, x-ray machine images must not be visible to the public or press.
When physical constraints prevent x-ray images from being fully protected from public viewing, TSOs must ensure no member of the public or press is in a position to observe an x-ray monitor for an extended period of time.
Passengers and other unauthorized individuals must not be allowed to view EDS or ETD monitors and screens.
Huh.  Now...why would that be?
First guess, they don't want the "terrorists" to see how good/bad the x-ray devices are.
Second more cynical guess: Xray machines are mostly useless and the TSA doesn't want the public to realize it's a bunch of voodoo?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362648</id>
	<title>These guys are in charge of "security?"  A farce.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260304680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently, this didn't make it through the screener at the Document Security Administration ("DSA").</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently , this did n't make it through the screener at the Document Security Administration ( " DSA " ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently, this didn't make it through the screener at the Document Security Administration ("DSA").</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30374734</id>
	<title>This is all Very Nice...</title>
	<author>IonOtter</author>
	<datestamp>1260301920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...but I wanna see the ULTIMATE, the holiest of the holy, the Big Kahuna of top-secret files:  The No-Fly List.</p><p>You can post this security theater stuff all day, and they're only going to whinge and make the occasional farting noise over it.</p><p>Post the No-Fly List if you <i>really</i> want to impress people.  And watch cryptome and wikileaks go offline like a light switch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...but I wan na see the ULTIMATE , the holiest of the holy , the Big Kahuna of top-secret files : The No-Fly List.You can post this security theater stuff all day , and they 're only going to whinge and make the occasional farting noise over it.Post the No-Fly List if you really want to impress people .
And watch cryptome and wikileaks go offline like a light switch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but I wanna see the ULTIMATE, the holiest of the holy, the Big Kahuna of top-secret files:  The No-Fly List.You can post this security theater stuff all day, and they're only going to whinge and make the occasional farting noise over it.Post the No-Fly List if you really want to impress people.
And watch cryptome and wikileaks go offline like a light switch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365310</id>
	<title>Redax</title>
	<author>OhHellWithIt</author>
	<datestamp>1260288120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It looks to me like Appligent is going to gain another customer for <a href="http://www.appligent.com/redax" title="appligent.com" rel="nofollow">Redax</a> [appligent.com]. If you're gonna black it out, do it right.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks to me like Appligent is going to gain another customer for Redax [ appligent.com ] .
If you 're gon na black it out , do it right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks to me like Appligent is going to gain another customer for Redax [appligent.com].
If you're gonna black it out, do it right.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365086</id>
	<title>Re:The TSA redacting process</title>
	<author>bkr1\_2k</author>
	<datestamp>1260287160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We obviously travel to different airports.  Every security line I've ever gotten in required some form of government photo ID to actually get into the security checkpoint.  When traveling internationally, that is ALWAYS a passport.</p><p>Does it actually do anything for security?  I don't think so... but they do check ID.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We obviously travel to different airports .
Every security line I 've ever gotten in required some form of government photo ID to actually get into the security checkpoint .
When traveling internationally , that is ALWAYS a passport.Does it actually do anything for security ?
I do n't think so... but they do check ID .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We obviously travel to different airports.
Every security line I've ever gotten in required some form of government photo ID to actually get into the security checkpoint.
When traveling internationally, that is ALWAYS a passport.Does it actually do anything for security?
I don't think so... but they do check ID.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362026</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>TejWC</author>
	<datestamp>1260210660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They posted the malformed link just to prevent censorship via the slashdot effect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They posted the malformed link just to prevent censorship via the slashdot effect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They posted the malformed link just to prevent censorship via the slashdot effect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362660</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>jibster</author>
	<datestamp>1260304800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about this as a reasonable explanation?<p>

The TSA, like all government oganisations, is a bureaucratic behemoth which is built on Standard Operating Proceedures.</p><p>

SOPs are written by people with no training in writing.  The SOPs are used by persons with absolutly no understanding of the underlying meaning of the SOP.</p><p>

In this case we have an SOP for releasing documents to the public that may or may not have originated in the TSA but is being interpreted by TSA employees.</p><p>

Let me take each of your examples in turn:</p><p>

1. TSOs follow a procedure when explosives are discovered</p><p>
SOP contains a section that says you must not reveal our proceedures for reacting to terrorists</p><p>

2. X-rays have a test procedure</p><p>
You must not reveal technicial details of test equipment including calibration proceedures.</p><p>

3. Only certain personnel are allowed to clear indivudals</p><p>
I haven't got a clue about this one, maybe the same as the next?</p><p>

4. Aircrew are subjected to modified screening procedures.</p><p>
You must not reveal the methods we use for sampling passengers lest the terrorist learn how to work the system.</p><p>

Because the person applying the SOP does not understand the intention of the instructions in the document they feel they must apply it in the broadest strokes and so you get really silly applications.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about this as a reasonable explanation ?
The TSA , like all government oganisations , is a bureaucratic behemoth which is built on Standard Operating Proceedures .
SOPs are written by people with no training in writing .
The SOPs are used by persons with absolutly no understanding of the underlying meaning of the SOP .
In this case we have an SOP for releasing documents to the public that may or may not have originated in the TSA but is being interpreted by TSA employees .
Let me take each of your examples in turn : 1 .
TSOs follow a procedure when explosives are discovered SOP contains a section that says you must not reveal our proceedures for reacting to terrorists 2 .
X-rays have a test procedure You must not reveal technicial details of test equipment including calibration proceedures .
3. Only certain personnel are allowed to clear indivudals I have n't got a clue about this one , maybe the same as the next ?
4. Aircrew are subjected to modified screening procedures .
You must not reveal the methods we use for sampling passengers lest the terrorist learn how to work the system .
Because the person applying the SOP does not understand the intention of the instructions in the document they feel they must apply it in the broadest strokes and so you get really silly applications .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about this as a reasonable explanation?
The TSA, like all government oganisations, is a bureaucratic behemoth which is built on Standard Operating Proceedures.
SOPs are written by people with no training in writing.
The SOPs are used by persons with absolutly no understanding of the underlying meaning of the SOP.
In this case we have an SOP for releasing documents to the public that may or may not have originated in the TSA but is being interpreted by TSA employees.
Let me take each of your examples in turn:

1.
TSOs follow a procedure when explosives are discovered
SOP contains a section that says you must not reveal our proceedures for reacting to terrorists

2.
X-rays have a test procedure
You must not reveal technicial details of test equipment including calibration proceedures.
3. Only certain personnel are allowed to clear indivudals
I haven't got a clue about this one, maybe the same as the next?
4. Aircrew are subjected to modified screening procedures.
You must not reveal the methods we use for sampling passengers lest the terrorist learn how to work the system.
Because the person applying the SOP does not understand the intention of the instructions in the document they feel they must apply it in the broadest strokes and so you get really silly applications.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30367348</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>SWPadnos</author>
	<datestamp>1260297000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, most of it is stupid, but as an example, I now know that if I want to create an explosive device, I need to use smaller than 28 gauge wire - so I should stick to 30 or, just to be safe, 36-gauge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , most of it is stupid , but as an example , I now know that if I want to create an explosive device , I need to use smaller than 28 gauge wire - so I should stick to 30 or , just to be safe , 36-gauge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, most of it is stupid, but as an example, I now know that if I want to create an explosive device, I need to use smaller than 28 gauge wire - so I should stick to 30 or, just to be safe, 36-gauge.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30367502</id>
	<title>Re:TSA?</title>
	<author>kwerle</author>
	<datestamp>1260297720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Half the time significance isn't even a requirement.</p></div><p>Half?  Where is this wonderful version of slashdot you have access to?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Half the time significance is n't even a requirement.Half ?
Where is this wonderful version of slashdot you have access to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Half the time significance isn't even a requirement.Half?
Where is this wonderful version of slashdot you have access to?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365270</id>
	<title>Re:why are they so scared about xray monitors?</title>
	<author>Nevynxxx</author>
	<datestamp>1260287940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps they don't want Joe Schmo running around screaming "oh Christ he's got a gun" when they see a funny shape they shouldn't?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps they do n't want Joe Schmo running around screaming " oh Christ he 's got a gun " when they see a funny shape they should n't ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps they don't want Joe Schmo running around screaming "oh Christ he's got a gun" when they see a funny shape they shouldn't?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362156</id>
	<title>go4t</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260212040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">First, you have to Software 7awyers luck I'll find our chances</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>First , you have to Software 7awyers luck I 'll find our chances [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, you have to Software 7awyers luck I'll find our chances [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363758</id>
	<title>Re:The TSA redacting process</title>
	<author>sangreal66</author>
	<datestamp>1260277680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They no longer do the boarding pass check after the metal detector.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They no longer do the boarding pass check after the metal detector .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They no longer do the boarding pass check after the metal detector.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361990</id>
	<title>TSA?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260210360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why so little context in the description of this article?<br>From a quick google around.. it seems that the TSA referred to here is a US government agency of some sort -  Transport Security Administration.<br>Perhaps it's assumed around here that almost every TLA from the USA is of global significance and widely understood.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why so little context in the description of this article ? From a quick google around.. it seems that the TSA referred to here is a US government agency of some sort - Transport Security Administration.Perhaps it 's assumed around here that almost every TLA from the USA is of global significance and widely understood .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why so little context in the description of this article?From a quick google around.. it seems that the TSA referred to here is a US government agency of some sort -  Transport Security Administration.Perhaps it's assumed around here that almost every TLA from the USA is of global significance and widely understood.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362520</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260302940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know your post was meant to be a joke, but a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.zip file is not usually opened automatically by a Web browser like a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.pdf is, and the guess might be that most people who open that document would want to save it. I don't know why; maybe it's because cryptome.org expects to get a takedown request soon from the Transportation Security Administration in a great display of Streisand effect...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know your post was meant to be a joke , but a .zip file is not usually opened automatically by a Web browser like a .pdf is , and the guess might be that most people who open that document would want to save it .
I do n't know why ; maybe it 's because cryptome.org expects to get a takedown request soon from the Transportation Security Administration in a great display of Streisand effect... : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know your post was meant to be a joke, but a .zip file is not usually opened automatically by a Web browser like a .pdf is, and the guess might be that most people who open that document would want to save it.
I don't know why; maybe it's because cryptome.org expects to get a takedown request soon from the Transportation Security Administration in a great display of Streisand effect... :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362222</id>
	<title>Re:Can the mirrors please</title>
	<author>kormoc</author>
	<datestamp>1260212760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The areas outlined in red are the previously blacked out areas</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The areas outlined in red are the previously blacked out areas</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The areas outlined in red are the previously blacked out areas</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361976</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361958</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260210000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the individual&rsquo;s photo ID is a passport issued by the Government of Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Somalia, Iraq, Yemen, or Algeria, refer the individual for selectee screening...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the individual    s photo ID is a passport issued by the Government of Cuba , Iran , North Korea , Libya , Syria , Sudan , Afghanistan , Lebanon , Somalia , Iraq , Yemen , or Algeria , refer the individual for selectee screening.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the individual’s photo ID is a passport issued by the Government of Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Somalia, Iraq, Yemen, or Algeria, refer the individual for selectee screening...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30403414</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1260553980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Haven&rsquo;t you ever heard of an off-duty officer?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Haven    t you ever heard of an off-duty officer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Haven’t you ever heard of an off-duty officer?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362656</id>
	<title>THIS HAS HAPPENED BEFORE!</title>
	<author>slimjim8094</author>
	<datestamp>1260304740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The <i>exact same thing</i> has happened before, and was even covered on slashdot, many many times.</p><p><a href="http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/08/05/20/0228229/FBI-Wiretapping-Audit-Secrets-Uncovered-Via-CtrlC" title="slashdot.org">http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/08/05/20/0228229/FBI-Wiretapping-Audit-Secrets-Uncovered-Via-CtrlC</a> [slashdot.org]<br><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/22/138210" title="slashdot.org">http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/22/138210</a> [slashdot.org]<br><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/03/11/01/1729257/Memory-Hole-Un-Redacts-Redacted-DOJ-Memo" title="slashdot.org">http://yro.slashdot.org/story/03/11/01/1729257/Memory-Hole-Un-Redacts-Redacted-DOJ-Memo</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The exact same thing has happened before , and was even covered on slashdot , many many times.http : //entertainment.slashdot.org/story/08/05/20/0228229/FBI-Wiretapping-Audit-Secrets-Uncovered-Via-CtrlC [ slashdot.org ] http : //it.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 06/06/22/138210 [ slashdot.org ] http : //yro.slashdot.org/story/03/11/01/1729257/Memory-Hole-Un-Redacts-Redacted-DOJ-Memo [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The exact same thing has happened before, and was even covered on slashdot, many many times.http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/08/05/20/0228229/FBI-Wiretapping-Audit-Secrets-Uncovered-Via-CtrlC [slashdot.org]http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/22/138210 [slashdot.org]http://yro.slashdot.org/story/03/11/01/1729257/Memory-Hole-Un-Redacts-Redacted-DOJ-Memo [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364342</id>
	<title>Re:One interesting redacted section</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1260283320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>refer the individual for selectee screening unless the individual has been exempted from selectee<br>screening by the FSD or aircraft operator.</p></div><p>Since when can aircraft operators exempt anyone from screening?<br>I thought "selectee" and secondary screening crap was 100\% Federal now.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>refer the individual for selectee screening unless the individual has been exempted from selecteescreening by the FSD or aircraft operator.Since when can aircraft operators exempt anyone from screening ? I thought " selectee " and secondary screening crap was 100 \ % Federal now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>refer the individual for selectee screening unless the individual has been exempted from selecteescreening by the FSD or aircraft operator.Since when can aircraft operators exempt anyone from screening?I thought "selectee" and secondary screening crap was 100\% Federal now.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362534</id>
	<title>profiling</title>
	<author>c0llin</author>
	<datestamp>1260303120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>iv. If the individual&rsquo;s photo ID is a passport issued by the Government of Cuba, Iran, North
Korea, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Somalia, Iraq, Yemen, or Algeria, refer
the individual for selectee screening unless the individual has been exempted from selectee
screening by the FSD or aircraft operator.

really?</htmltext>
<tokenext>iv .
If the individual    s photo ID is a passport issued by the Government of Cuba , Iran , North Korea , Libya , Syria , Sudan , Afghanistan , Lebanon , Somalia , Iraq , Yemen , or Algeria , refer the individual for selectee screening unless the individual has been exempted from selectee screening by the FSD or aircraft operator .
really ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iv.
If the individual’s photo ID is a passport issued by the Government of Cuba, Iran, North
Korea, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Somalia, Iraq, Yemen, or Algeria, refer
the individual for selectee screening unless the individual has been exempted from selectee
screening by the FSD or aircraft operator.
really?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>Kral\_Blbec</author>
	<datestamp>1260210960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>dude, you zipped a pdf....<br>thats almost as bad as when my mom puts a jpg in a doc to email it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>dude , you zipped a pdf....thats almost as bad as when my mom puts a jpg in a doc to email it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dude, you zipped a pdf....thats almost as bad as when my mom puts a jpg in a doc to email it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364562</id>
	<title>Re:One interesting redacted section</title>
	<author>MiniMike</author>
	<datestamp>1260284700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's surprising that people from countries that either support terrorism or have terrorists running all over them* get selected for more screening?  Why would the TSA pass up such a great chance to increase their illusion of security?  I'm actually surprised there's not a few more on the list.  Otoh, it probably is easier for many of the 'bad guys' to legitimately obtain these passports as that's the country they're from.
<p>
* Not sure why Cuba is on the list, except that the U.S. government seems to like to stick it to them every chance they get.  IIRC Cuban hijackers usually want to get TO the U.S., and wouldn't be going through TSA checkpoints.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's surprising that people from countries that either support terrorism or have terrorists running all over them * get selected for more screening ?
Why would the TSA pass up such a great chance to increase their illusion of security ?
I 'm actually surprised there 's not a few more on the list .
Otoh , it probably is easier for many of the 'bad guys ' to legitimately obtain these passports as that 's the country they 're from .
* Not sure why Cuba is on the list , except that the U.S. government seems to like to stick it to them every chance they get .
IIRC Cuban hijackers usually want to get TO the U.S. , and would n't be going through TSA checkpoints .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's surprising that people from countries that either support terrorism or have terrorists running all over them* get selected for more screening?
Why would the TSA pass up such a great chance to increase their illusion of security?
I'm actually surprised there's not a few more on the list.
Otoh, it probably is easier for many of the 'bad guys' to legitimately obtain these passports as that's the country they're from.
* Not sure why Cuba is on the list, except that the U.S. government seems to like to stick it to them every chance they get.
IIRC Cuban hijackers usually want to get TO the U.S., and wouldn't be going through TSA checkpoints.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364886</id>
	<title>Re:Don't click!</title>
	<author>headhot</author>
	<datestamp>1260286320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The TSA can find a gun in a back pack, how are they going to track down busybodies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The TSA can find a gun in a back pack , how are they going to track down busybodies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The TSA can find a gun in a back pack, how are they going to track down busybodies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30367664</id>
	<title>Re:TSA?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260298440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People like you really make me wish I could mod comments -1 Stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People like you really make me wish I could mod comments -1 Stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People like you really make me wish I could mod comments -1 Stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362164</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>IndustrialComplex</author>
	<datestamp>1260212100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>On what planet is it necessary to keep facts like these secret?</i></p><p>Is it necessary to reveal them in this manner, or would the interest of the public be served by simply knowing that:</p><p>1.  TSOs follow a procedure when explosives are discovered<br>2.  X-rays have a test procedure<br>3.  Only certain personnel are allowed to clear indivudals<br>4.  Aircrew are subjected to modified screening procedures.</p><p>Is it relevant to know the details of those items?  If it was related to my FOIA request, perhaps, but I think we should keep in mind that an open government doesn't require fully open records to meet the spirit of an open government.</p><p>If I somehow needed a database from a military hospital for a court case I was involved in, I would hope that any patient records would be anonymized if they weren't necessary for the trial.</p><p>Just as we don't necessarily need to know the exact metrics which cause an x-ray machine to fail an inspection unless we were specifically interested in the testing procedures of x-ray machines.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On what planet is it necessary to keep facts like these secret ? Is it necessary to reveal them in this manner , or would the interest of the public be served by simply knowing that : 1 .
TSOs follow a procedure when explosives are discovered2 .
X-rays have a test procedure3 .
Only certain personnel are allowed to clear indivudals4 .
Aircrew are subjected to modified screening procedures.Is it relevant to know the details of those items ?
If it was related to my FOIA request , perhaps , but I think we should keep in mind that an open government does n't require fully open records to meet the spirit of an open government.If I somehow needed a database from a military hospital for a court case I was involved in , I would hope that any patient records would be anonymized if they were n't necessary for the trial.Just as we do n't necessarily need to know the exact metrics which cause an x-ray machine to fail an inspection unless we were specifically interested in the testing procedures of x-ray machines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On what planet is it necessary to keep facts like these secret?Is it necessary to reveal them in this manner, or would the interest of the public be served by simply knowing that:1.
TSOs follow a procedure when explosives are discovered2.
X-rays have a test procedure3.
Only certain personnel are allowed to clear indivudals4.
Aircrew are subjected to modified screening procedures.Is it relevant to know the details of those items?
If it was related to my FOIA request, perhaps, but I think we should keep in mind that an open government doesn't require fully open records to meet the spirit of an open government.If I somehow needed a database from a military hospital for a court case I was involved in, I would hope that any patient records would be anonymized if they weren't necessary for the trial.Just as we don't necessarily need to know the exact metrics which cause an x-ray machine to fail an inspection unless we were specifically interested in the testing procedures of x-ray machines.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365102</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>MikeD83</author>
	<datestamp>1260287220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's funny about redacting the aircraft operator flight crew exemption is that the public <i>actually sees</i> this happen. I was at a security checkpoint waiting to put by bag into the X-ray machine when a pilot jumped in front of me. He didn't take his shoes off and walked though the metal detector with his Starbuck's coffee with no questions asked. I was irate! First, these folks get to jump the line, then they're not subject to the security policies. What's to prevent a member of the aircrew from turning into a terrorist?<br> <br>
I guess I'm in line for security theater... and I'm not entertained.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's funny about redacting the aircraft operator flight crew exemption is that the public actually sees this happen .
I was at a security checkpoint waiting to put by bag into the X-ray machine when a pilot jumped in front of me .
He did n't take his shoes off and walked though the metal detector with his Starbuck 's coffee with no questions asked .
I was irate !
First , these folks get to jump the line , then they 're not subject to the security policies .
What 's to prevent a member of the aircrew from turning into a terrorist ?
I guess I 'm in line for security theater... and I 'm not entertained .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's funny about redacting the aircraft operator flight crew exemption is that the public actually sees this happen.
I was at a security checkpoint waiting to put by bag into the X-ray machine when a pilot jumped in front of me.
He didn't take his shoes off and walked though the metal detector with his Starbuck's coffee with no questions asked.
I was irate!
First, these folks get to jump the line, then they're not subject to the security policies.
What's to prevent a member of the aircrew from turning into a terrorist?
I guess I'm in line for security theater... and I'm not entertained.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30366500</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>khallow</author>
	<datestamp>1260292860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>On what planet is it necessary to keep facts like these secret?</p></div><p>As a clarification, this is "sensitive information" not <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classified\_information" title="wikipedia.org">"classified information"</a> [wikipedia.org]. There's no regulation on or penalty for regular people to know or distribute this information. The idea is that certain information, like the current working procedures of airline passenger screeners, should not be common knowledge easily available (on the internet, newspapers, etc). Thus, employees are not allowed to talk about it to others. You can still pick up this information by standing in line. It's meant to be a hurdle making terrorists work a bit harder rather than some impermeable barrier.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On what planet is it necessary to keep facts like these secret ? As a clarification , this is " sensitive information " not " classified information " [ wikipedia.org ] .
There 's no regulation on or penalty for regular people to know or distribute this information .
The idea is that certain information , like the current working procedures of airline passenger screeners , should not be common knowledge easily available ( on the internet , newspapers , etc ) .
Thus , employees are not allowed to talk about it to others .
You can still pick up this information by standing in line .
It 's meant to be a hurdle making terrorists work a bit harder rather than some impermeable barrier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On what planet is it necessary to keep facts like these secret?As a clarification, this is "sensitive information" not "classified information" [wikipedia.org].
There's no regulation on or penalty for regular people to know or distribute this information.
The idea is that certain information, like the current working procedures of airline passenger screeners, should not be common knowledge easily available (on the internet, newspapers, etc).
Thus, employees are not allowed to talk about it to others.
You can still pick up this information by standing in line.
It's meant to be a hurdle making terrorists work a bit harder rather than some impermeable barrier.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365292</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>OhHellWithIt</author>
	<datestamp>1260288060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It looks to me like the hosting person saved 400KB, or about one-fifth the size. That's worth it, IMHO.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks to me like the hosting person saved 400KB , or about one-fifth the size .
That 's worth it , IMHO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks to me like the hosting person saved 400KB, or about one-fifth the size.
That's worth it, IMHO.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361976</id>
	<title>Can the mirrors please</title>
	<author>shermo</author>
	<datestamp>1260210180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dammit. The mirrored files have the highlighting taken out so I don't know where the juicy bits are in the document.</p><p>Can someone mirror it with the highlighting left in?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dammit .
The mirrored files have the highlighting taken out so I do n't know where the juicy bits are in the document.Can someone mirror it with the highlighting left in ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dammit.
The mirrored files have the highlighting taken out so I don't know where the juicy bits are in the document.Can someone mirror it with the highlighting left in?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362140</id>
	<title>The TSA redacting process</title>
	<author>MosesJones</author>
	<datestamp>1260211920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This clearly comes from the people who thought up my favourite piece of brain dead "security" from the TSA</p><p>When you enter the line to the security gate a TSA numpty checks your boarding pass to make sure you are allowed to join the line.  Everyone joining the line has their boarding pass checked, this is a piece of paper often printed on a computer that says what flight you are on, its just about the easiest thing to fake in the history of fakery.</p><p>Then you lob everything into the x-ray machine, clearly needing to separate your laptop out as clearly its impossible to see stuff through that.  Shoes of course, belts, internal organs...</p><p>Then as you step through the body scanner some TSA numpty says "boarding pass please".  Pointing out that you've just put all your crap through the machine and that your boarding pass is with your passport and your wallet is of course pointless.  The answer... wait until it comes out of the machine and then show the numpty.  you are of course also checked at the gate with both passport (hard to fake) and boarding pass (trivial to fake).</p><p>So in otherwords the TSA check TWICE a piece of easy to fake information and NEVER check your ruddy passport.</p><p>So how did the TSA redact this PDF.  Well simple they had the same process.  The first person pasted on the black squares.  This was then printed out.</p><p>The first checker then looked at the printed out copy and said "looks fine to me"</p><p>This document was then scanned in and then printed again to be checked by a second checker who said "yup all okay"</p><p>And then they put the ORIGINIAL electronic copy on line with the pasting over the top.</p><p>The TSA is to security what Micheal Vick is to Pet Care</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This clearly comes from the people who thought up my favourite piece of brain dead " security " from the TSAWhen you enter the line to the security gate a TSA numpty checks your boarding pass to make sure you are allowed to join the line .
Everyone joining the line has their boarding pass checked , this is a piece of paper often printed on a computer that says what flight you are on , its just about the easiest thing to fake in the history of fakery.Then you lob everything into the x-ray machine , clearly needing to separate your laptop out as clearly its impossible to see stuff through that .
Shoes of course , belts , internal organs...Then as you step through the body scanner some TSA numpty says " boarding pass please " .
Pointing out that you 've just put all your crap through the machine and that your boarding pass is with your passport and your wallet is of course pointless .
The answer... wait until it comes out of the machine and then show the numpty .
you are of course also checked at the gate with both passport ( hard to fake ) and boarding pass ( trivial to fake ) .So in otherwords the TSA check TWICE a piece of easy to fake information and NEVER check your ruddy passport.So how did the TSA redact this PDF .
Well simple they had the same process .
The first person pasted on the black squares .
This was then printed out.The first checker then looked at the printed out copy and said " looks fine to me " This document was then scanned in and then printed again to be checked by a second checker who said " yup all okay " And then they put the ORIGINIAL electronic copy on line with the pasting over the top.The TSA is to security what Micheal Vick is to Pet Care</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This clearly comes from the people who thought up my favourite piece of brain dead "security" from the TSAWhen you enter the line to the security gate a TSA numpty checks your boarding pass to make sure you are allowed to join the line.
Everyone joining the line has their boarding pass checked, this is a piece of paper often printed on a computer that says what flight you are on, its just about the easiest thing to fake in the history of fakery.Then you lob everything into the x-ray machine, clearly needing to separate your laptop out as clearly its impossible to see stuff through that.
Shoes of course, belts, internal organs...Then as you step through the body scanner some TSA numpty says "boarding pass please".
Pointing out that you've just put all your crap through the machine and that your boarding pass is with your passport and your wallet is of course pointless.
The answer... wait until it comes out of the machine and then show the numpty.
you are of course also checked at the gate with both passport (hard to fake) and boarding pass (trivial to fake).So in otherwords the TSA check TWICE a piece of easy to fake information and NEVER check your ruddy passport.So how did the TSA redact this PDF.
Well simple they had the same process.
The first person pasted on the black squares.
This was then printed out.The first checker then looked at the printed out copy and said "looks fine to me"This document was then scanned in and then printed again to be checked by a second checker who said "yup all okay"And then they put the ORIGINIAL electronic copy on line with the pasting over the top.The TSA is to security what Micheal Vick is to Pet Care</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362566</id>
	<title>Re:why are they so scared about xray monitors?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260303480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't think it's valid to not want potential smugglers to know what has contrast in a bag? Or what parts of a circuit board are visible in an x-ray machine?</p><p>I suspect that information is not readily available (at least not in detail), and would help me disguise something a great deal to know if I was so inclined.</p><p>This one, I think is actually not stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't think it 's valid to not want potential smugglers to know what has contrast in a bag ?
Or what parts of a circuit board are visible in an x-ray machine ? I suspect that information is not readily available ( at least not in detail ) , and would help me disguise something a great deal to know if I was so inclined.This one , I think is actually not stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't think it's valid to not want potential smugglers to know what has contrast in a bag?
Or what parts of a circuit board are visible in an x-ray machine?I suspect that information is not readily available (at least not in detail), and would help me disguise something a great deal to know if I was so inclined.This one, I think is actually not stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362852</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>ghostdoc</author>
	<datestamp>1260264540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's so you don't know what you don't know.</p><p>Redacting just the properly secret bits would give you too much of an idea about what is secret, and that would allow you to make educated guesses about what the secret bits maybe are.</p><p>Redacting the secrtet bits plus a random selection of paragraphs prevents you from guessing the secret bits.</p><p>But I'm just guessing here<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's so you do n't know what you do n't know.Redacting just the properly secret bits would give you too much of an idea about what is secret , and that would allow you to make educated guesses about what the secret bits maybe are.Redacting the secrtet bits plus a random selection of paragraphs prevents you from guessing the secret bits.But I 'm just guessing here ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's so you don't know what you don't know.Redacting just the properly secret bits would give you too much of an idea about what is secret, and that would allow you to make educated guesses about what the secret bits maybe are.Redacting the secrtet bits plus a random selection of paragraphs prevents you from guessing the secret bits.But I'm just guessing here ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363868</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>C0vardeAn0nim0</author>
	<datestamp>1260279060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>could be worse. she could have ziped the doc that contains the jpg...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>could be worse .
she could have ziped the doc that contains the jpg.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>could be worse.
she could have ziped the doc that contains the jpg...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362866</id>
	<title>Re:Pehaps intentional?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260264900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After some time you realise that you cannot give government agencies too little credit. They're just not smart enough to pull off a fake.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After some time you realise that you can not give government agencies too little credit .
They 're just not smart enough to pull off a fake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After some time you realise that you cannot give government agencies too little credit.
They're just not smart enough to pull off a fake.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362496</id>
	<title>Re:Use what they give you!</title>
	<author>hitmark</author>
	<datestamp>1260302520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>maybe they cant afford a upgrade?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>maybe they cant afford a upgrade ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>maybe they cant afford a upgrade?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362654</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260304680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More relevant, I think, is that knowing the exact calibration thresholds for the xray machines; which aircrew uniforms are exempted from screenings, etc might allow terrorists/malcontents to adjust their smuggling/terrorism plans to better avoid or circumvent those protection.</p><p>While this *IS* unquestionably a form of security through obscurity, I can clearly see whey a security force would want to prevent this information being public.</p><p>(EG, knowing that the sensitivity cut-off for wire is 28 gauge, one could substitute say-- 36 gauge wire in their bomb instead, because that would be too thin to be reliably detected, and may pass right through inspection unnoticed.)</p><p>Or, in the case of a suicide bomber, knowing which aircrew uniforms to procure prior to the operation to avoid being detained and searched by the airport security personnel could be very handy.</p><p>Essentially, they wanted to "black box" the details of their security protocols, to make them harder to target for circumvention. (No puns about the ineffective redaction intended)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More relevant , I think , is that knowing the exact calibration thresholds for the xray machines ; which aircrew uniforms are exempted from screenings , etc might allow terrorists/malcontents to adjust their smuggling/terrorism plans to better avoid or circumvent those protection.While this * IS * unquestionably a form of security through obscurity , I can clearly see whey a security force would want to prevent this information being public .
( EG , knowing that the sensitivity cut-off for wire is 28 gauge , one could substitute say-- 36 gauge wire in their bomb instead , because that would be too thin to be reliably detected , and may pass right through inspection unnoticed .
) Or , in the case of a suicide bomber , knowing which aircrew uniforms to procure prior to the operation to avoid being detained and searched by the airport security personnel could be very handy.Essentially , they wanted to " black box " the details of their security protocols , to make them harder to target for circumvention .
( No puns about the ineffective redaction intended )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More relevant, I think, is that knowing the exact calibration thresholds for the xray machines; which aircrew uniforms are exempted from screenings, etc might allow terrorists/malcontents to adjust their smuggling/terrorism plans to better avoid or circumvent those protection.While this *IS* unquestionably a form of security through obscurity, I can clearly see whey a security force would want to prevent this information being public.
(EG, knowing that the sensitivity cut-off for wire is 28 gauge, one could substitute say-- 36 gauge wire in their bomb instead, because that would be too thin to be reliably detected, and may pass right through inspection unnoticed.
)Or, in the case of a suicide bomber, knowing which aircrew uniforms to procure prior to the operation to avoid being detained and searched by the airport security personnel could be very handy.Essentially, they wanted to "black box" the details of their security protocols, to make them harder to target for circumvention.
(No puns about the ineffective redaction intended)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365152</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260287460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I hope it does not get worse than that,</p></div><p>Following their "we make hammers so everything looks like a nail" philosophy, I'm sure VMWare's working on developing a standard of using entire virtual machine images as the standard for sharing rich content online.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope it does not get worse than that,Following their " we make hammers so everything looks like a nail " philosophy , I 'm sure VMWare 's working on developing a standard of using entire virtual machine images as the standard for sharing rich content online .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope it does not get worse than that,Following their "we make hammers so everything looks like a nail" philosophy, I'm sure VMWare's working on developing a standard of using entire virtual machine images as the standard for sharing rich content online.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362472</id>
	<title>Not the first time I've seen it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260215820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I used to manage an E-discovery group at a<br>lawfirm. We would receive stuff like this from<br>opposing council all the time.</p><p>People really are that stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to manage an E-discovery group at alawfirm .
We would receive stuff like this fromopposing council all the time.People really are that stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to manage an E-discovery group at alawfirm.
We would receive stuff like this fromopposing council all the time.People really are that stupid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363834</id>
	<title>Re:TSA?</title>
	<author>PhilHibbs</author>
	<datestamp>1260278640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From <a href="http://slashdot.org/faq/editorial.shtml#ed850" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">the FAQ</a> [slashdot.org]:</p><p>Q: Slashdot seems to be very U.S.-centric. Do you have any plans to be more international in your scope?</p><p>A: Slashdot <i>is</i> U.S.-centric. We readily admit this, and really don't see it as a problem. Slashdot is run by Americans, after all, and the vast majority of our readership is in the U.S. We're certainly not opposed to doing more international stories, but we don't have any formal plans for making that happen. All we can really tell you is that if you're outside the U.S. and you have news, submit it, and if it looks interesting, we'll post it.</p><p>It is worth noting that there is a <a href="http://slashdot.jp/" title="slashdot.jp" rel="nofollow">Japanese Slashdot</a> [slashdot.jp] run by VA Japan. While we helped them a little in their early days, they essentially run their own content without any real involvement from us... none of us can read Kanji! There are currently no plans to do other language or nation specific Slashdot sites.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the FAQ [ slashdot.org ] : Q : Slashdot seems to be very U.S.-centric .
Do you have any plans to be more international in your scope ? A : Slashdot is U.S.-centric .
We readily admit this , and really do n't see it as a problem .
Slashdot is run by Americans , after all , and the vast majority of our readership is in the U.S. We 're certainly not opposed to doing more international stories , but we do n't have any formal plans for making that happen .
All we can really tell you is that if you 're outside the U.S. and you have news , submit it , and if it looks interesting , we 'll post it.It is worth noting that there is a Japanese Slashdot [ slashdot.jp ] run by VA Japan .
While we helped them a little in their early days , they essentially run their own content without any real involvement from us... none of us can read Kanji !
There are currently no plans to do other language or nation specific Slashdot sites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the FAQ [slashdot.org]:Q: Slashdot seems to be very U.S.-centric.
Do you have any plans to be more international in your scope?A: Slashdot is U.S.-centric.
We readily admit this, and really don't see it as a problem.
Slashdot is run by Americans, after all, and the vast majority of our readership is in the U.S. We're certainly not opposed to doing more international stories, but we don't have any formal plans for making that happen.
All we can really tell you is that if you're outside the U.S. and you have news, submit it, and if it looks interesting, we'll post it.It is worth noting that there is a Japanese Slashdot [slashdot.jp] run by VA Japan.
While we helped them a little in their early days, they essentially run their own content without any real involvement from us... none of us can read Kanji!
There are currently no plans to do other language or nation specific Slashdot sites.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362374</id>
	<title>Re:The real link to the cryptome file</title>
	<author>ihuntrocks</author>
	<datestamp>1260214620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not at all regarding the article or the discussion, but I just have to say: Nice Emiliano Zapata quote in your sig.</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not at all regarding the article or the discussion , but I just have to say : Nice Emiliano Zapata quote in your sig .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not at all regarding the article or the discussion, but I just have to say: Nice Emiliano Zapata quote in your sig.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30367438</id>
	<title>Re:why are they so scared about xray monitors?</title>
	<author>rfelsburg</author>
	<datestamp>1260297480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Having actually left a pocket knife in my carry on, I was quite surprised that they did in fact find it. It was buried at the bottom of the bag, under a bunch of electronics.

I was always under the impression that the x-rays were just eye-candy, however this last experience has actually made me wonder about the usefulness of them, as they no longer seem inept/useless to me.

Just my thoughts,

-Rob</htmltext>
<tokenext>Having actually left a pocket knife in my carry on , I was quite surprised that they did in fact find it .
It was buried at the bottom of the bag , under a bunch of electronics .
I was always under the impression that the x-rays were just eye-candy , however this last experience has actually made me wonder about the usefulness of them , as they no longer seem inept/useless to me .
Just my thoughts , -Rob</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having actually left a pocket knife in my carry on, I was quite surprised that they did in fact find it.
It was buried at the bottom of the bag, under a bunch of electronics.
I was always under the impression that the x-rays were just eye-candy, however this last experience has actually made me wonder about the usefulness of them, as they no longer seem inept/useless to me.
Just my thoughts,

-Rob</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362680</id>
	<title>Re:Small Arms Ammunition allowed?</title>
	<author>basketcase</author>
	<datestamp>1260305160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, flying with a checked and properly declared firearm is a great way to keep your stuff safe.  You are required by federal law to use locks that the TSA can't open so you don't have to worry about them stealing stuff from your case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , flying with a checked and properly declared firearm is a great way to keep your stuff safe .
You are required by federal law to use locks that the TSA ca n't open so you do n't have to worry about them stealing stuff from your case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, flying with a checked and properly declared firearm is a great way to keep your stuff safe.
You are required by federal law to use locks that the TSA can't open so you don't have to worry about them stealing stuff from your case.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363320</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260271860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You do realize that despite the internals, a zipped pdf may be quite a bit smaller than the raw pdf?</p><p>Perhaps you'd prefer a smarter more time intensive approach (tweaking the pdf itself), but there's no question that if you're just out to reduce size in a simple easy-to-understand and perform manner, this is a perfectly reasonable action.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do realize that despite the internals , a zipped pdf may be quite a bit smaller than the raw pdf ? Perhaps you 'd prefer a smarter more time intensive approach ( tweaking the pdf itself ) , but there 's no question that if you 're just out to reduce size in a simple easy-to-understand and perform manner , this is a perfectly reasonable action .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do realize that despite the internals, a zipped pdf may be quite a bit smaller than the raw pdf?Perhaps you'd prefer a smarter more time intensive approach (tweaking the pdf itself), but there's no question that if you're just out to reduce size in a simple easy-to-understand and perform manner, this is a perfectly reasonable action.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362022</id>
	<title>CIA Redactions</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260210660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reminds me of the story about CIA Redactions--that in reality they use black highlighers for the important stuff.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of the story about CIA Redactions--that in reality they use black highlighers for the important stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of the story about CIA Redactions--that in reality they use black highlighers for the important stuff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362172</id>
	<title>I would love to see Figure J</title>
	<author>Wannabe Code Monkey</author>
	<datestamp>1260212100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The redacted portion of section 3.1.2 references a "Fig. J", yet this figure is not in the document... I would loooove to see what figure J is all about.</p><p>Also, the non-redacted section about Diplomatic Pouches (4.1) is interesting. Specifically point E.3:</p><blockquote><div><p>Diplomatic pouches that are inadvertently submitted for screening and that alarm (either accessible property or checked baggage) must be denied access to the sterile or secured area and returned by the STSO to the diplomatic courier or aircraft operator without any further screening.  If required, notify an LEO/BAO for items that alarmed the screening system.</p></div></blockquote><p>If they accidentally screen a diplomatic pouch and it tests positive for something, the bag isn't allowed into the secured area... but it's returned to the courier un-investigated. And they'll just be able to bring it on another flight where it won't get screened this time. I get the concept behind diplomatic pouches, but once the veil is pierced I don't think it makes sense to just ignore what you saw, especially once you know something's wrong. What if the courier opened the pouch themselves and showed the screener a ticking bomb and then closed it up again? The screener was never supposed to see that, so what then? Just go about your business?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The redacted portion of section 3.1.2 references a " Fig .
J " , yet this figure is not in the document... I would loooove to see what figure J is all about.Also , the non-redacted section about Diplomatic Pouches ( 4.1 ) is interesting .
Specifically point E.3 : Diplomatic pouches that are inadvertently submitted for screening and that alarm ( either accessible property or checked baggage ) must be denied access to the sterile or secured area and returned by the STSO to the diplomatic courier or aircraft operator without any further screening .
If required , notify an LEO/BAO for items that alarmed the screening system.If they accidentally screen a diplomatic pouch and it tests positive for something , the bag is n't allowed into the secured area... but it 's returned to the courier un-investigated .
And they 'll just be able to bring it on another flight where it wo n't get screened this time .
I get the concept behind diplomatic pouches , but once the veil is pierced I do n't think it makes sense to just ignore what you saw , especially once you know something 's wrong .
What if the courier opened the pouch themselves and showed the screener a ticking bomb and then closed it up again ?
The screener was never supposed to see that , so what then ?
Just go about your business ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The redacted portion of section 3.1.2 references a "Fig.
J", yet this figure is not in the document... I would loooove to see what figure J is all about.Also, the non-redacted section about Diplomatic Pouches (4.1) is interesting.
Specifically point E.3:Diplomatic pouches that are inadvertently submitted for screening and that alarm (either accessible property or checked baggage) must be denied access to the sterile or secured area and returned by the STSO to the diplomatic courier or aircraft operator without any further screening.
If required, notify an LEO/BAO for items that alarmed the screening system.If they accidentally screen a diplomatic pouch and it tests positive for something, the bag isn't allowed into the secured area... but it's returned to the courier un-investigated.
And they'll just be able to bring it on another flight where it won't get screened this time.
I get the concept behind diplomatic pouches, but once the veil is pierced I don't think it makes sense to just ignore what you saw, especially once you know something's wrong.
What if the courier opened the pouch themselves and showed the screener a ticking bomb and then closed it up again?
The screener was never supposed to see that, so what then?
Just go about your business?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365456</id>
	<title>Re:One interesting redacted section</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260288720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's cute that Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates are not on that list.</p><p>9/11 anyone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's cute that Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates are not on that list.9/11 anyone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's cute that Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates are not on that list.9/11 anyone?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363456</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>jez9999</author>
	<datestamp>1260273780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone have a link to the actual redacted original?  The TSA appear to have taken it down now and you need it to see what was redacted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone have a link to the actual redacted original ?
The TSA appear to have taken it down now and you need it to see what was redacted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone have a link to the actual redacted original?
The TSA appear to have taken it down now and you need it to see what was redacted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364640</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260285120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well #4 is important... what if some religious zealots decided to crash an airplane into an abortion clinic?</p><p>Oh wait, a fair chunk of the politics are those kinds of religious zealots, they just would prefer to see their wife and kids again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well # 4 is important... what if some religious zealots decided to crash an airplane into an abortion clinic ? Oh wait , a fair chunk of the politics are those kinds of religious zealots , they just would prefer to see their wife and kids again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well #4 is important... what if some religious zealots decided to crash an airplane into an abortion clinic?Oh wait, a fair chunk of the politics are those kinds of religious zealots, they just would prefer to see their wife and kids again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362298</id>
	<title>Re:I would love to see Figure J</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1260213660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know someone who used to fly for an airline. They had passengers who were authorized for diplomatic reasons to carry guns, but the guns had to be unloaded and locked in a box. The Captain had the key but the purser had to check that the gun was unloaded. So this gun goes in the box. Pursor signs on the dotted line that the weapon is unloaded. Captain for some reason doesn't believe him. Maybe the weight of the box or some other reason. Captain says okay lets give it a test. Checks for clearance overhead, points the weapon skywards and pulls the trigger. The gun fires of course and the captain is in a bit of strife. But his responsibility ultimately goes beyond what the law required in this instance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know someone who used to fly for an airline .
They had passengers who were authorized for diplomatic reasons to carry guns , but the guns had to be unloaded and locked in a box .
The Captain had the key but the purser had to check that the gun was unloaded .
So this gun goes in the box .
Pursor signs on the dotted line that the weapon is unloaded .
Captain for some reason does n't believe him .
Maybe the weight of the box or some other reason .
Captain says okay lets give it a test .
Checks for clearance overhead , points the weapon skywards and pulls the trigger .
The gun fires of course and the captain is in a bit of strife .
But his responsibility ultimately goes beyond what the law required in this instance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know someone who used to fly for an airline.
They had passengers who were authorized for diplomatic reasons to carry guns, but the guns had to be unloaded and locked in a box.
The Captain had the key but the purser had to check that the gun was unloaded.
So this gun goes in the box.
Pursor signs on the dotted line that the weapon is unloaded.
Captain for some reason doesn't believe him.
Maybe the weight of the box or some other reason.
Captain says okay lets give it a test.
Checks for clearance overhead, points the weapon skywards and pulls the trigger.
The gun fires of course and the captain is in a bit of strife.
But his responsibility ultimately goes beyond what the law required in this instance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365236</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>sublimemm</author>
	<datestamp>1260287760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or when a customer takes a 'screen shot' by taking a picture of the screen</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or when a customer takes a 'screen shot ' by taking a picture of the screen</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or when a customer takes a 'screen shot' by taking a picture of the screen</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362528</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>zmotula</author>
	<datestamp>1260303000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just this weekend I experienced a flash game embedded in a XLS enclosed in an Outlook<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.eml file. I hope it does not get worse than that, otherwise I am sure we'd be breaking some laws of topology.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just this weekend I experienced a flash game embedded in a XLS enclosed in an Outlook .eml file .
I hope it does not get worse than that , otherwise I am sure we 'd be breaking some laws of topology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just this weekend I experienced a flash game embedded in a XLS enclosed in an Outlook .eml file.
I hope it does not get worse than that, otherwise I am sure we'd be breaking some laws of topology.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30368284</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>CAIMLAS</author>
	<datestamp>1260300840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My wife says: "Yeah, I'd probably shoot that person." I have to concur.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My wife says : " Yeah , I 'd probably shoot that person .
" I have to concur .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My wife says: "Yeah, I'd probably shoot that person.
" I have to concur.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362888</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>JunkmanUK</author>
	<datestamp>1260265260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least embedding in a word document can decease the file size a little...!  When you have clients sending 30Mb emails containing high resolution scans of their utility bill anything is welcome. Why on earth do they insist on scanning an electricity bill at 1200dpi or sometimes more??!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least embedding in a word document can decease the file size a little... !
When you have clients sending 30Mb emails containing high resolution scans of their utility bill anything is welcome .
Why on earth do they insist on scanning an electricity bill at 1200dpi or sometimes more ? ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least embedding in a word document can decease the file size a little...!
When you have clients sending 30Mb emails containing high resolution scans of their utility bill anything is welcome.
Why on earth do they insist on scanning an electricity bill at 1200dpi or sometimes more??
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363058</id>
	<title>Re:TSA?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260267360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's an American website, silly.  Plenty of stuff refers to the NSA, FBI, and CIA.</p><p>Global significance.  Lol.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's an American website , silly .
Plenty of stuff refers to the NSA , FBI , and CIA.Global significance .
Lol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's an American website, silly.
Plenty of stuff refers to the NSA, FBI, and CIA.Global significance.
Lol.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30366870</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1260294720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure it was a Flash game?</p><p>I've seen pixel-perfect clones of Pac-Man, complete with sound effects, written in VBA in Excel itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure it was a Flash game ? I 've seen pixel-perfect clones of Pac-Man , complete with sound effects , written in VBA in Excel itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure it was a Flash game?I've seen pixel-perfect clones of Pac-Man, complete with sound effects, written in VBA in Excel itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362346</id>
	<title>Re:TSA?</title>
	<author>amRadioHed</author>
	<datestamp>1260214260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since when has global significance been a requirement for slashdot articles? Half the time significance isn't even a requirement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when has global significance been a requirement for slashdot articles ?
Half the time significance is n't even a requirement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when has global significance been a requirement for slashdot articles?
Half the time significance isn't even a requirement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30366848</id>
	<title>Re:The TSA redacting process</title>
	<author>DavidTC</author>
	<datestamp>1260294540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They <b>are</b> used for other purposes. Read <a href="http://www.csoonline.com/article/214946/The\_No\_Fly\_List\_and\_Airport\_Security\_s\_Achilles\_Heel" title="csoonline.com">this</a> [csoonline.com]. Here is the important part:</p><p>
1. Joe Terrorist (whose name is on the no-fly list) buys a ticket online in the name of Joe Smith using a stolen credit card^H^H^H^H. Joe Smith is not listed on the terrorist watch list.</p><p>
2. Joe Terrorist then prints his "Joe Smith" boarding pass at home, and then electronically alters it to create a second almost identical boarding pass under the name Joe Terrorist, his name.</p><p>
3. Joe Terrorist then goes to the airport and goes through security with his real ID and the FAKE boarding pass. The name and face match his real driver&rsquo;s license. The airport employee matches the name and face to the real ID.</p><p>
4. The TSA guard at the magnetometer checks to make sure that the boarding pass looks legitimate as Joe Terrorist goes through. He or she does not scan it into the system, so there is still no hint that the name on the fake boarding pass is not the same as the name on the reservation.</p><p>
5. Joe Terrorist then goes through the gate into his plane using the real Joe Smith boarding pass for the gate&rsquo;s computer scanner. He is not asked for ID again to match the name on the scanner, so the fact that he does not have an ID with that name does not matter. (Since Joe Smith doesn&rsquo;t actually exist it does not coincide with a name on the terrorist watch list) Joe Terrorist boards the plane, no questions asked.</p><p>
TADA. A terrorist, on the no fly list, just flew <b>without even bothering to get fake ID</b>. (Rendering all Real ID talk total nonsense.)</p><p>
And note I erased 'stolen credit card'. The credit card doesn't have to be stolen. Names of CC purchasers are not checked against the no-fly list, as far as anyone knows. If they are, there are probably ways to fly without a credit card, and if not, getting a credit card in a fake name is easy enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are used for other purposes .
Read this [ csoonline.com ] .
Here is the important part : 1 .
Joe Terrorist ( whose name is on the no-fly list ) buys a ticket online in the name of Joe Smith using a stolen credit card ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H .
Joe Smith is not listed on the terrorist watch list .
2. Joe Terrorist then prints his " Joe Smith " boarding pass at home , and then electronically alters it to create a second almost identical boarding pass under the name Joe Terrorist , his name .
3. Joe Terrorist then goes to the airport and goes through security with his real ID and the FAKE boarding pass .
The name and face match his real driver    s license .
The airport employee matches the name and face to the real ID .
4. The TSA guard at the magnetometer checks to make sure that the boarding pass looks legitimate as Joe Terrorist goes through .
He or she does not scan it into the system , so there is still no hint that the name on the fake boarding pass is not the same as the name on the reservation .
5. Joe Terrorist then goes through the gate into his plane using the real Joe Smith boarding pass for the gate    s computer scanner .
He is not asked for ID again to match the name on the scanner , so the fact that he does not have an ID with that name does not matter .
( Since Joe Smith doesn    t actually exist it does not coincide with a name on the terrorist watch list ) Joe Terrorist boards the plane , no questions asked .
TADA. A terrorist , on the no fly list , just flew without even bothering to get fake ID .
( Rendering all Real ID talk total nonsense .
) And note I erased 'stolen credit card' .
The credit card does n't have to be stolen .
Names of CC purchasers are not checked against the no-fly list , as far as anyone knows .
If they are , there are probably ways to fly without a credit card , and if not , getting a credit card in a fake name is easy enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are used for other purposes.
Read this [csoonline.com].
Here is the important part:
1.
Joe Terrorist (whose name is on the no-fly list) buys a ticket online in the name of Joe Smith using a stolen credit card^H^H^H^H.
Joe Smith is not listed on the terrorist watch list.
2. Joe Terrorist then prints his "Joe Smith" boarding pass at home, and then electronically alters it to create a second almost identical boarding pass under the name Joe Terrorist, his name.
3. Joe Terrorist then goes to the airport and goes through security with his real ID and the FAKE boarding pass.
The name and face match his real driver’s license.
The airport employee matches the name and face to the real ID.
4. The TSA guard at the magnetometer checks to make sure that the boarding pass looks legitimate as Joe Terrorist goes through.
He or she does not scan it into the system, so there is still no hint that the name on the fake boarding pass is not the same as the name on the reservation.
5. Joe Terrorist then goes through the gate into his plane using the real Joe Smith boarding pass for the gate’s computer scanner.
He is not asked for ID again to match the name on the scanner, so the fact that he does not have an ID with that name does not matter.
(Since Joe Smith doesn’t actually exist it does not coincide with a name on the terrorist watch list) Joe Terrorist boards the plane, no questions asked.
TADA. A terrorist, on the no fly list, just flew without even bothering to get fake ID.
(Rendering all Real ID talk total nonsense.
)
And note I erased 'stolen credit card'.
The credit card doesn't have to be stolen.
Names of CC purchasers are not checked against the no-fly list, as far as anyone knows.
If they are, there are probably ways to fly without a credit card, and if not, getting a credit card in a fake name is easy enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361954</id>
	<title>Don't click!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260210000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How do you know this isn't some kind of trap, a honeypot to track down all of you nosy busybodies?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you know this is n't some kind of trap , a honeypot to track down all of you nosy busybodies ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you know this isn't some kind of trap, a honeypot to track down all of you nosy busybodies?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362068</id>
	<title>Re:The real link to the cryptome file</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260211200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>FFS, don't mod the fucker down - the dude's trying to provide the link.  Fucktards with mod points.</htmltext>
<tokenext>FFS , do n't mod the fucker down - the dude 's trying to provide the link .
Fucktards with mod points .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FFS, don't mod the fucker down - the dude's trying to provide the link.
Fucktards with mod points.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30405308</id>
	<title>Re:One interesting redacted section</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1260561360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And when were we last attacked by a Cuban national??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And when were we last attacked by a Cuban national ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And when were we last attacked by a Cuban national?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362724</id>
	<title>Re:I would love to see Figure J</title>
	<author>greg1104</author>
	<datestamp>1260305820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OMG!  I saw the same thing once!  Only it turned out the <a href="http://www.tsa.gov/press/releases/2002/press\_release\_0104.shtm" title="tsa.gov">prohibited item not allowed in the cabin</a> [tsa.gov] was actually <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megatron\_(Transformers)" title="wikipedia.org">Megatron</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OMG !
I saw the same thing once !
Only it turned out the prohibited item not allowed in the cabin [ tsa.gov ] was actually Megatron [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OMG!
I saw the same thing once!
Only it turned out the prohibited item not allowed in the cabin [tsa.gov] was actually Megatron [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362298</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362484</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>hitmark</author>
	<datestamp>1260215940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>all those 3-4 letter "words" makes it sound like some telco internal manual...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>all those 3-4 letter " words " makes it sound like some telco internal manual.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>all those 3-4 letter "words" makes it sound like some telco internal manual...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30366054</id>
	<title>Possibility...</title>
	<author>Conspiracy\_Of\_Doves</author>
	<datestamp>1260291300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone consider the possibility that this WAS a competent clerk?</p><p>But that he was also one of us?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone consider the possibility that this WAS a competent clerk ? But that he was also one of us ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone consider the possibility that this WAS a competent clerk?But that he was also one of us?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363014</id>
	<title>Re:TSA?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260266580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, it's an American website.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it 's an American website .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it's an American website.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362102</id>
	<title>As effective as the rest of the TSA</title>
	<author>BrianRoach</author>
	<datestamp>1260211500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is the fact that their redacting technique is as useful and effective as their screening techniques surprising to anyone?</p><p>TSA, bringing you the best in security theatre since 2001!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is the fact that their redacting technique is as useful and effective as their screening techniques surprising to anyone ? TSA , bringing you the best in security theatre since 2001 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is the fact that their redacting technique is as useful and effective as their screening techniques surprising to anyone?TSA, bringing you the best in security theatre since 2001!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362292</id>
	<title>Re:Don't click!</title>
	<author>magarity</author>
	<datestamp>1260213660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's what your neighbor's open WAP is for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what your neighbor 's open WAP is for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what your neighbor's open WAP is for.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362116</id>
	<title>Small Arms Ammunition allowed?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260211620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This wasn't blacked out or anything, but I had to laugh a bit if you look under 'Hazardous Materials Reference Document'</p><p>"Ammunition, small arms Small arms ammunition (up to 50-caliber cartridges<br>or 8-gauge shells) for personal use may be carried in checked baggage if securely<br>packed in boxes or packaging specifically designed for carrying ammunition.  No<br>loaded firearms permitted in checked baggage"</p><p>I had to re-read that and was like err..  wait a minute...  50-caliber? Wow, that's allowed?  Yet will freak out over a bottle of shampoo, huh? rofl<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This was n't blacked out or anything , but I had to laugh a bit if you look under 'Hazardous Materials Reference Document ' " Ammunition , small arms Small arms ammunition ( up to 50-caliber cartridgesor 8-gauge shells ) for personal use may be carried in checked baggage if securelypacked in boxes or packaging specifically designed for carrying ammunition .
Noloaded firearms permitted in checked baggage " I had to re-read that and was like err.. wait a minute... 50-caliber ? Wow , that 's allowed ?
Yet will freak out over a bottle of shampoo , huh ?
rofl .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This wasn't blacked out or anything, but I had to laugh a bit if you look under 'Hazardous Materials Reference Document'"Ammunition, small arms Small arms ammunition (up to 50-caliber cartridgesor 8-gauge shells) for personal use may be carried in checked baggage if securelypacked in boxes or packaging specifically designed for carrying ammunition.
Noloaded firearms permitted in checked baggage"I had to re-read that and was like err..  wait a minute...  50-caliber? Wow, that's allowed?
Yet will freak out over a bottle of shampoo, huh?
rofl ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362310</id>
	<title>Re:why are they so scared about xray monitors?</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1260213840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Second more cynical guess: Xray machines are mostly useless and the TSA doesn't want the public to realize it's a bunch of voodoo?</p></div><p>The exact specifications and design limits of the machine is classified for a reason -- <b>pictures of the operating parts give clues as to what those criterion might be.</b> If you had photographs of the insides of the equipment you could infer the strength of the x-ray source and the resolution of the scanner, and from that you might figure out that, for example, #40 AWG wire wouldn't be visible if run it along a fiberglass housing. Or that the machine's stepper motors are only capable of moving the plates to a finite number of angles. Those are handy things to know if you wanted to get a prohibited item/device (or its components) past the scanner.</p><p>It should also be pointed out that these machines have a variety of image filters and enhancements that can be selected by the operator. The interactions between these standard operating modes and the device's limitations not being fully understood by the operator (because frankly, the training is not very technical) could be exploited.</p><p>Conclusion: It's not only a reasonable, but highly prudent, security measure.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Second more cynical guess : Xray machines are mostly useless and the TSA does n't want the public to realize it 's a bunch of voodoo ? The exact specifications and design limits of the machine is classified for a reason -- pictures of the operating parts give clues as to what those criterion might be .
If you had photographs of the insides of the equipment you could infer the strength of the x-ray source and the resolution of the scanner , and from that you might figure out that , for example , # 40 AWG wire would n't be visible if run it along a fiberglass housing .
Or that the machine 's stepper motors are only capable of moving the plates to a finite number of angles .
Those are handy things to know if you wanted to get a prohibited item/device ( or its components ) past the scanner.It should also be pointed out that these machines have a variety of image filters and enhancements that can be selected by the operator .
The interactions between these standard operating modes and the device 's limitations not being fully understood by the operator ( because frankly , the training is not very technical ) could be exploited.Conclusion : It 's not only a reasonable , but highly prudent , security measure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Second more cynical guess: Xray machines are mostly useless and the TSA doesn't want the public to realize it's a bunch of voodoo?The exact specifications and design limits of the machine is classified for a reason -- pictures of the operating parts give clues as to what those criterion might be.
If you had photographs of the insides of the equipment you could infer the strength of the x-ray source and the resolution of the scanner, and from that you might figure out that, for example, #40 AWG wire wouldn't be visible if run it along a fiberglass housing.
Or that the machine's stepper motors are only capable of moving the plates to a finite number of angles.
Those are handy things to know if you wanted to get a prohibited item/device (or its components) past the scanner.It should also be pointed out that these machines have a variety of image filters and enhancements that can be selected by the operator.
The interactions between these standard operating modes and the device's limitations not being fully understood by the operator (because frankly, the training is not very technical) could be exploited.Conclusion: It's not only a reasonable, but highly prudent, security measure.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363338</id>
	<title>Re:TSA?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260272220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You seem a bit indignant that Slashdot was founded by Americans, is hosted in America, and is most likely frequented by a large host of American users, and has a large proportion of its posts pertain to American issues.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You seem a bit indignant that Slashdot was founded by Americans , is hosted in America , and is most likely frequented by a large host of American users , and has a large proportion of its posts pertain to American issues .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You seem a bit indignant that Slashdot was founded by Americans, is hosted in America, and is most likely frequented by a large host of American users, and has a large proportion of its posts pertain to American issues.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30369760</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>Hertzyscowicz</author>
	<datestamp>1260263880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except that now most of the people downloading it will hopefully save the file on their computer, so they won't be coming back tomorrow to download the 1.8 megabytes again if they decide to have another look at the doc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except that now most of the people downloading it will hopefully save the file on their computer , so they wo n't be coming back tomorrow to download the 1.8 megabytes again if they decide to have another look at the doc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except that now most of the people downloading it will hopefully save the file on their computer, so they won't be coming back tomorrow to download the 1.8 megabytes again if they decide to have another look at the doc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30369234</id>
	<title>Re:Don't click!</title>
	<author>poofmeisterp</author>
	<datestamp>1260304680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'cuz the government sucks at managing money.  Internet access is cheap, and they use the comments on Slashdot to find solutions without hiring a large group of technical analysis specialists and legal reviewers that cost a l</p><p>Wait, they just hired them.  Never mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'cuz the government sucks at managing money .
Internet access is cheap , and they use the comments on Slashdot to find solutions without hiring a large group of technical analysis specialists and legal reviewers that cost a lWait , they just hired them .
Never mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'cuz the government sucks at managing money.
Internet access is cheap, and they use the comments on Slashdot to find solutions without hiring a large group of technical analysis specialists and legal reviewers that cost a lWait, they just hired them.
Never mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361884</id>
	<title>fp</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260209220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. editors' broken link reveals all</htmltext>
<tokenext>And / .
editors ' broken link reveals all</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And /.
editors' broken link reveals all</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364568</id>
	<title>Re:The TSA redacting process</title>
	<author>rnaiguy</author>
	<datestamp>1260284700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So in otherwords the TSA check TWICE a piece of easy to fake information and NEVER check your ruddy passport.</p></div><p>As much as I enjoy bashing the government, when is the last time you've boarded a plane in the US? Every time I've flown in the last two years (I never flew much before), I have been required to present a state-issued ID as well as a boarding pass to even start moving through security. I've even seen one woman not allowed through because her driver's license was expired.
</p><p>
I suspect that they may have revised the procedure when they realized how silly it was.
The boarding pass though is still very fakeable (as are some state's IDs).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So in otherwords the TSA check TWICE a piece of easy to fake information and NEVER check your ruddy passport.As much as I enjoy bashing the government , when is the last time you 've boarded a plane in the US ?
Every time I 've flown in the last two years ( I never flew much before ) , I have been required to present a state-issued ID as well as a boarding pass to even start moving through security .
I 've even seen one woman not allowed through because her driver 's license was expired .
I suspect that they may have revised the procedure when they realized how silly it was .
The boarding pass though is still very fakeable ( as are some state 's IDs ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So in otherwords the TSA check TWICE a piece of easy to fake information and NEVER check your ruddy passport.As much as I enjoy bashing the government, when is the last time you've boarded a plane in the US?
Every time I've flown in the last two years (I never flew much before), I have been required to present a state-issued ID as well as a boarding pass to even start moving through security.
I've even seen one woman not allowed through because her driver's license was expired.
I suspect that they may have revised the procedure when they realized how silly it was.
The boarding pass though is still very fakeable (as are some state's IDs).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362358</id>
	<title>Re:why are they so scared about xray monitors?</title>
	<author>pete-classic</author>
	<datestamp>1260214380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's almost certainly to prevent test runs.</p><p>Suppose you're a religious fundamentalist wack-job who thinks your God wants you to kill people who aren't following his rules.  You'd probably have ideas about ways to get certain things on the plane*.  (And you'd probably just do it.)</p><p>Now, imagine you're some white-bread, middle aged man from the Midwest with a wife, a couple of kids, and a dog.  Suppose it's you're job to stop Mr. Wack-job.  You'd probably think in terms of what you'd have on the line if you went up against Uncle Sam.  And you'd probably suppose that he'd want to do some test runs with indifferent items with similar physical characteristics to the naughty items.  But, because the test items would be neither dangerous nor prohibited, you couldn't count on security indicating that they saw the items.</p><p>Mr. Wack-job would gain much more information if he could watch the monitor for signs of his test items while an accomplice ran them through security.</p><p>-Peter</p><p>* I can think of several such items and approaches (and probable counter-measures, and possible counter-counter-measures), but I will keep them to myself so as to avoid any risk of giving the impression that I condone such behavior.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's almost certainly to prevent test runs.Suppose you 're a religious fundamentalist wack-job who thinks your God wants you to kill people who are n't following his rules .
You 'd probably have ideas about ways to get certain things on the plane * .
( And you 'd probably just do it .
) Now , imagine you 're some white-bread , middle aged man from the Midwest with a wife , a couple of kids , and a dog .
Suppose it 's you 're job to stop Mr. Wack-job. You 'd probably think in terms of what you 'd have on the line if you went up against Uncle Sam .
And you 'd probably suppose that he 'd want to do some test runs with indifferent items with similar physical characteristics to the naughty items .
But , because the test items would be neither dangerous nor prohibited , you could n't count on security indicating that they saw the items.Mr .
Wack-job would gain much more information if he could watch the monitor for signs of his test items while an accomplice ran them through security.-Peter * I can think of several such items and approaches ( and probable counter-measures , and possible counter-counter-measures ) , but I will keep them to myself so as to avoid any risk of giving the impression that I condone such behavior .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's almost certainly to prevent test runs.Suppose you're a religious fundamentalist wack-job who thinks your God wants you to kill people who aren't following his rules.
You'd probably have ideas about ways to get certain things on the plane*.
(And you'd probably just do it.
)Now, imagine you're some white-bread, middle aged man from the Midwest with a wife, a couple of kids, and a dog.
Suppose it's you're job to stop Mr. Wack-job.  You'd probably think in terms of what you'd have on the line if you went up against Uncle Sam.
And you'd probably suppose that he'd want to do some test runs with indifferent items with similar physical characteristics to the naughty items.
But, because the test items would be neither dangerous nor prohibited, you couldn't count on security indicating that they saw the items.Mr.
Wack-job would gain much more information if he could watch the monitor for signs of his test items while an accomplice ran them through security.-Peter* I can think of several such items and approaches (and probable counter-measures, and possible counter-counter-measures), but I will keep them to myself so as to avoid any risk of giving the impression that I condone such behavior.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362052</id>
	<title>Pehaps intentional?</title>
	<author>a whoabot</author>
	<datestamp>1260210960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From what I can tell, some of the information which was poorly blacked out could be helpful to people who want to get things/persons past security.</p><p>However, that is under the assumption that the information is accurate.  Perhaps this information is just misleading and the file was poorly blacked out so that people would crack it and assume that it is accurate.</p><p>Maybe one way to find out: Does anyone can fired or demoted for this? If not...maybe because it was intentional after all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From what I can tell , some of the information which was poorly blacked out could be helpful to people who want to get things/persons past security.However , that is under the assumption that the information is accurate .
Perhaps this information is just misleading and the file was poorly blacked out so that people would crack it and assume that it is accurate.Maybe one way to find out : Does anyone can fired or demoted for this ?
If not...maybe because it was intentional after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From what I can tell, some of the information which was poorly blacked out could be helpful to people who want to get things/persons past security.However, that is under the assumption that the information is accurate.
Perhaps this information is just misleading and the file was poorly blacked out so that people would crack it and assume that it is accurate.Maybe one way to find out: Does anyone can fired or demoted for this?
If not...maybe because it was intentional after all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362746</id>
	<title>Plain text to PDF better</title>
	<author>failedlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1260262980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Distributing FOIA documents in electronic forma bears the consequence of leaving employee and Word/Acrobat metadata. They should should just dump the file into a plain text and then run it through a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.txt to PDF converter.</p><p>Instead of drawing over words or phrases with black marker as is common, it should be acceptable to redact words, sentences or paragraphs with ", ". If its need to know, you won't get the information anyways so it isn't relevant to know how much information is redacted, I can't see how this would contribute to openness. It also avoids the games people have played in the past with being able to guess what the redacted word(s) or a sentence by judging the spacing of characters and type of font used missing from the text.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Distributing FOIA documents in electronic forma bears the consequence of leaving employee and Word/Acrobat metadata .
They should should just dump the file into a plain text and then run it through a .txt to PDF converter.Instead of drawing over words or phrases with black marker as is common , it should be acceptable to redact words , sentences or paragraphs with " , " .
If its need to know , you wo n't get the information anyways so it is n't relevant to know how much information is redacted , I ca n't see how this would contribute to openness .
It also avoids the games people have played in the past with being able to guess what the redacted word ( s ) or a sentence by judging the spacing of characters and type of font used missing from the text .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Distributing FOIA documents in electronic forma bears the consequence of leaving employee and Word/Acrobat metadata.
They should should just dump the file into a plain text and then run it through a .txt to PDF converter.Instead of drawing over words or phrases with black marker as is common, it should be acceptable to redact words, sentences or paragraphs with ", ".
If its need to know, you won't get the information anyways so it isn't relevant to know how much information is redacted, I can't see how this would contribute to openness.
It also avoids the games people have played in the past with being able to guess what the redacted word(s) or a sentence by judging the spacing of characters and type of font used missing from the text.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361874</id>
	<title>Select All</title>
	<author>Reason58</author>
	<datestamp>1260209160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>ctrl-a is a bitch, huh?</htmltext>
<tokenext>ctrl-a is a bitch , huh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ctrl-a is a bitch, huh?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30370026</id>
	<title>Re:Select All</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1260265380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;&gt;ctrl-a is a bitch, huh?</p><p>I'm using a Mac you insensitive clod!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; &gt; ctrl-a is a bitch , huh ? I 'm using a Mac you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;&gt;ctrl-a is a bitch, huh?I'm using a Mac you insensitive clod!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361874</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362482</id>
	<title>Re:The TSA redacting process</title>
	<author>supersat</author>
	<datestamp>1260215820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suspect the boarding pass check is primarily to keep the TSA from being overwhelmed by people not flying, such as family members waiting for you to arrive. Using it for any other purpose (including identifying selectees) is pretty pointless until they actually validate the boarding pass. They're slowly starting to do this, but it's a long process.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect the boarding pass check is primarily to keep the TSA from being overwhelmed by people not flying , such as family members waiting for you to arrive .
Using it for any other purpose ( including identifying selectees ) is pretty pointless until they actually validate the boarding pass .
They 're slowly starting to do this , but it 's a long process .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect the boarding pass check is primarily to keep the TSA from being overwhelmed by people not flying, such as family members waiting for you to arrive.
Using it for any other purpose (including identifying selectees) is pretty pointless until they actually validate the boarding pass.
They're slowly starting to do this, but it's a long process.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362192</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>unitron</author>
	<datestamp>1260212340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't you understand?  The terrorists are all changing all of the 28 gauge wire on all of their suitcase bombs to 30 gauge wire even as we speak!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't you understand ?
The terrorists are all changing all of the 28 gauge wire on all of their suitcase bombs to 30 gauge wire even as we speak !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't you understand?
The terrorists are all changing all of the 28 gauge wire on all of their suitcase bombs to 30 gauge wire even as we speak!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30374290</id>
	<title>Misleading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260296100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Call me paranoid, but faking a poor redaction can also be an effective method of spreading misinformation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Call me paranoid , but faking a poor redaction can also be an effective method of spreading misinformation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Call me paranoid, but faking a poor redaction can also be an effective method of spreading misinformation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362262</id>
	<title>Re:why are they so scared about xray monitors?</title>
	<author>nedlohs</author>
	<datestamp>1260213360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They aren't very good that.</p><p>I flew out of Newark yesterday and the three xray monitors for the xray scanner on the lane next to me was in plain site (and I would guess the other ones were in plain site for people in the other lanes - except the first lane they miss out). And since it took 15 minutes to get through every single passenger in line got to watch it for 15 minutes. It's easy to circle back for another pass through security, pick a different line if you think they might recognize you (but they won't anyway - at least not unless they review the security camera video later).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are n't very good that.I flew out of Newark yesterday and the three xray monitors for the xray scanner on the lane next to me was in plain site ( and I would guess the other ones were in plain site for people in the other lanes - except the first lane they miss out ) .
And since it took 15 minutes to get through every single passenger in line got to watch it for 15 minutes .
It 's easy to circle back for another pass through security , pick a different line if you think they might recognize you ( but they wo n't anyway - at least not unless they review the security camera video later ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They aren't very good that.I flew out of Newark yesterday and the three xray monitors for the xray scanner on the lane next to me was in plain site (and I would guess the other ones were in plain site for people in the other lanes - except the first lane they miss out).
And since it took 15 minutes to get through every single passenger in line got to watch it for 15 minutes.
It's easy to circle back for another pass through security, pick a different line if you think they might recognize you (but they won't anyway - at least not unless they review the security camera video later).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30369510</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260305940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>dude, you zipped a pdf....</p></div><p>that's how the TSA 'encrypted' it</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>dude , you zipped a pdf....that 's how the TSA 'encrypted ' it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dude, you zipped a pdf....that's how the TSA 'encrypted' it
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084</id>
	<title>Silly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260211320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here are typical examples of redacted paragraphs:</p><blockquote><div><p>Ensure TSOs do not handle explosives, incendiaries, or weapons if such items are discovered during the screening process.</p></div></blockquote><blockquote><div><p>D.    Whenever a Threat Image Projection (TIP) enabled x-ray is unable to detect 28-gauge wire at Step 10 on the Test Step Wedge, discontinue use. The STSO must immediately notify TSA management.</p></div></blockquote><blockquote><div><p>An airport assigned LEO (if available), STSO, or designated TSA representative clears the individual after inspecting his or her badge, credential, and Government-issued photo ID, and if flying, his or her boarding pass and Notice of LEO Flying Armed Document.</p></div></blockquote><blockquote><div><p>Aircraft operator flight crewmembers in uniform, with valid aircraft operator employee identification, are<br>exempt from the Unpredictable Screening Process and restrictions involving liquids, gels, aerosols, and footwear. Aircraft operator flight crewmembers in uniform, designated as selectees, are not exempt from the requirements regarding liquids, gels, aerosols, or footwear. Any alarm of the aircraft operator flight crewmember's person or accessible property must be cleared.</p></div></blockquote><p>On what planet is it necessary to keep facts like these secret?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here are typical examples of redacted paragraphs : Ensure TSOs do not handle explosives , incendiaries , or weapons if such items are discovered during the screening process.D .
Whenever a Threat Image Projection ( TIP ) enabled x-ray is unable to detect 28-gauge wire at Step 10 on the Test Step Wedge , discontinue use .
The STSO must immediately notify TSA management.An airport assigned LEO ( if available ) , STSO , or designated TSA representative clears the individual after inspecting his or her badge , credential , and Government-issued photo ID , and if flying , his or her boarding pass and Notice of LEO Flying Armed Document.Aircraft operator flight crewmembers in uniform , with valid aircraft operator employee identification , areexempt from the Unpredictable Screening Process and restrictions involving liquids , gels , aerosols , and footwear .
Aircraft operator flight crewmembers in uniform , designated as selectees , are not exempt from the requirements regarding liquids , gels , aerosols , or footwear .
Any alarm of the aircraft operator flight crewmember 's person or accessible property must be cleared.On what planet is it necessary to keep facts like these secret ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here are typical examples of redacted paragraphs:Ensure TSOs do not handle explosives, incendiaries, or weapons if such items are discovered during the screening process.D.
Whenever a Threat Image Projection (TIP) enabled x-ray is unable to detect 28-gauge wire at Step 10 on the Test Step Wedge, discontinue use.
The STSO must immediately notify TSA management.An airport assigned LEO (if available), STSO, or designated TSA representative clears the individual after inspecting his or her badge, credential, and Government-issued photo ID, and if flying, his or her boarding pass and Notice of LEO Flying Armed Document.Aircraft operator flight crewmembers in uniform, with valid aircraft operator employee identification, areexempt from the Unpredictable Screening Process and restrictions involving liquids, gels, aerosols, and footwear.
Aircraft operator flight crewmembers in uniform, designated as selectees, are not exempt from the requirements regarding liquids, gels, aerosols, or footwear.
Any alarm of the aircraft operator flight crewmember's person or accessible property must be cleared.On what planet is it necessary to keep facts like these secret?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361882</id>
	<title>The real link to the cryptome file</title>
	<author>JesseL</author>
	<datestamp>1260209220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is here:<br><a href="http://cryptome.org/tsa-screening.zip" title="cryptome.org" rel="nofollow">http://cryptome.org/tsa-screening.zip</a> [cryptome.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is here : http : //cryptome.org/tsa-screening.zip [ cryptome.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is here:http://cryptome.org/tsa-screening.zip [cryptome.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362284</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>nacturation</author>
	<datestamp>1260213540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More likely it's things like the fact that they don't require prosthetic limbs to be screened.  If the terr'rists knew that, we'd have them terr'rists wearing prosthetic legs that had C4 in them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More likely it 's things like the fact that they do n't require prosthetic limbs to be screened .
If the terr'rists knew that , we 'd have them terr'rists wearing prosthetic legs that had C4 in them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More likely it's things like the fact that they don't require prosthetic limbs to be screened.
If the terr'rists knew that, we'd have them terr'rists wearing prosthetic legs that had C4 in them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30370612</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>Chris Mattern</author>
	<datestamp>1260268260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>A working canine?</p></div></blockquote><p>One assumes that the TSA does hire the blind.  Not discriminating is part of the ADA, after all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A working canine ? One assumes that the TSA does hire the blind .
Not discriminating is part of the ADA , after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A working canine?One assumes that the TSA does hire the blind.
Not discriminating is part of the ADA, after all.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361960</id>
	<title>Worst. Link. Ever.</title>
	<author>hedronist</author>
	<datestamp>1260210060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
So is kdawson on drugs? Is s/he not on drugs but should be? Does s/he even know what the intertubes are? Can we find peace in our time? Or, horny as we are, can we even find a piece in our time? If we found a piece would we find peace?
</p><p>
So many questions<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So is kdawson on drugs ?
Is s/he not on drugs but should be ?
Does s/he even know what the intertubes are ?
Can we find peace in our time ?
Or , horny as we are , can we even find a piece in our time ?
If we found a piece would we find peace ?
So many questions ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
So is kdawson on drugs?
Is s/he not on drugs but should be?
Does s/he even know what the intertubes are?
Can we find peace in our time?
Or, horny as we are, can we even find a piece in our time?
If we found a piece would we find peace?
So many questions ....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362006</id>
	<title>Use what they give you!</title>
	<author>adamchou</author>
	<datestamp>1260210540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>How stupid are these people?! Adobe even has a <a href="http://help.adobe.com/en\_US/Acrobat/8.0/Professional/help.html?content=WS5E28D332-9FF7-4569-AFAD-79AD60092D4D.html" title="adobe.com">feature to redact</a> [adobe.com] (not draw black boxes) text from documents</htmltext>
<tokenext>How stupid are these people ? !
Adobe even has a feature to redact [ adobe.com ] ( not draw black boxes ) text from documents</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How stupid are these people?!
Adobe even has a feature to redact [adobe.com] (not draw black boxes) text from documents</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362978</id>
	<title>Re:The TSA redacting process</title>
	<author>OverlordQ</author>
	<datestamp>1260266340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>So in otherwords the TSA check TWICE a piece of easy to fake information and NEVER check your ruddy passport.</i></p><p>What? The first time I show them the boarding pass they require ID, my case I use my Passport. Can't say they've asked for it after that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So in otherwords the TSA check TWICE a piece of easy to fake information and NEVER check your ruddy passport.What ?
The first time I show them the boarding pass they require ID , my case I use my Passport .
Ca n't say they 've asked for it after that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So in otherwords the TSA check TWICE a piece of easy to fake information and NEVER check your ruddy passport.What?
The first time I show them the boarding pass they require ID, my case I use my Passport.
Can't say they've asked for it after that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872</id>
	<title>Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>hcmtnbiker</author>
	<datestamp>1260209160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://cryptome.org/tsa-screening.zip" title="cryptome.org">http://cryptome.org/tsa-screening.zip</a> [cryptome.org]

The actual link.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //cryptome.org/tsa-screening.zip [ cryptome.org ] The actual link .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://cryptome.org/tsa-screening.zip [cryptome.org]

The actual link.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362940</id>
	<title>One interesting redacted section</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260265860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iv. If the individual's photo ID is a passport issued by the Government of Cuba, Iran, North<br>Korea, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Somalia, Iraq, Yemen, or Algeria, refer<br>the individual for selectee screening unless the individual has been exempted from selectee<br>screening by the FSD or aircraft operator.</p><p>This section proves that the US Government and the TSA DO target certain groups (in this case people from certain countries) for extra screening (regardless of the individuals who may be members of these groups)</p><p>Are people with a Lebanese or Algerian passport more of a risk than other people? Or is it that these passports are easier for the bad guys to legitimately obtain than any other one?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iv .
If the individual 's photo ID is a passport issued by the Government of Cuba , Iran , NorthKorea , Libya , Syria , Sudan , Afghanistan , Lebanon , Somalia , Iraq , Yemen , or Algeria , referthe individual for selectee screening unless the individual has been exempted from selecteescreening by the FSD or aircraft operator.This section proves that the US Government and the TSA DO target certain groups ( in this case people from certain countries ) for extra screening ( regardless of the individuals who may be members of these groups ) Are people with a Lebanese or Algerian passport more of a risk than other people ?
Or is it that these passports are easier for the bad guys to legitimately obtain than any other one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iv.
If the individual's photo ID is a passport issued by the Government of Cuba, Iran, NorthKorea, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Somalia, Iraq, Yemen, or Algeria, referthe individual for selectee screening unless the individual has been exempted from selecteescreening by the FSD or aircraft operator.This section proves that the US Government and the TSA DO target certain groups (in this case people from certain countries) for extra screening (regardless of the individuals who may be members of these groups)Are people with a Lebanese or Algerian passport more of a risk than other people?
Or is it that these passports are easier for the bad guys to legitimately obtain than any other one?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362662</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>R3d M3rcury</author>
	<datestamp>1260304860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or my personal favorite:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>If designated by the FSD, inspect the credentials of LEOs, LEOs escorting prisoners, Federal Flight Deck Officers (FFDOs), Federal Air Marshals (FAMs), <b>credentialed TSA employees flying with a working canine, and U.S. Government employees required to fly armed</b> in order to clear them through the screening checkpoint.</p></div><p>The bolding is from the original, which is why the whole "credentialed TSA employees flying with a working canine" caught my eye.</p><p>A <i>working</i> canine?</p><ol> <li>This is a good thing.  After all, unemployed canines could disrupt a flight.  But does the canine also have to have some idea to show it's gainfully employed?  Does it have to be employed by the TSA?  Can an employee show up with <a href="http://www.jillidog.com/" title="jillidog.com">Jilli</a> [jillidog.com]?</li><li>Do TSA employees show up with broken canines?</li></ol><p>The mind reels...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or my personal favorite : If designated by the FSD , inspect the credentials of LEOs , LEOs escorting prisoners , Federal Flight Deck Officers ( FFDOs ) , Federal Air Marshals ( FAMs ) , credentialed TSA employees flying with a working canine , and U.S. Government employees required to fly armed in order to clear them through the screening checkpoint.The bolding is from the original , which is why the whole " credentialed TSA employees flying with a working canine " caught my eye.A working canine ?
This is a good thing .
After all , unemployed canines could disrupt a flight .
But does the canine also have to have some idea to show it 's gainfully employed ?
Does it have to be employed by the TSA ?
Can an employee show up with Jilli [ jillidog.com ] ? Do TSA employees show up with broken canines ? The mind reels.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or my personal favorite:If designated by the FSD, inspect the credentials of LEOs, LEOs escorting prisoners, Federal Flight Deck Officers (FFDOs), Federal Air Marshals (FAMs), credentialed TSA employees flying with a working canine, and U.S. Government employees required to fly armed in order to clear them through the screening checkpoint.The bolding is from the original, which is why the whole "credentialed TSA employees flying with a working canine" caught my eye.A working canine?
This is a good thing.
After all, unemployed canines could disrupt a flight.
But does the canine also have to have some idea to show it's gainfully employed?
Does it have to be employed by the TSA?
Can an employee show up with Jilli [jillidog.com]?Do TSA employees show up with broken canines?The mind reels...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363992</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260280740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>dude, you zipped a pdf....<br>thats almost as bad as when my mom puts a jpg in a doc to email it.</p></div><p>I zip everything that goes into a browser for download:  it's the only format that I can be fairly sure will be handled the same way across browsers.  Trade-offs...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>dude , you zipped a pdf....thats almost as bad as when my mom puts a jpg in a doc to email it.I zip everything that goes into a browser for download : it 's the only format that I can be fairly sure will be handled the same way across browsers .
Trade-offs.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dude, you zipped a pdf....thats almost as bad as when my mom puts a jpg in a doc to email it.I zip everything that goes into a browser for download:  it's the only format that I can be fairly sure will be handled the same way across browsers.
Trade-offs...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362758</id>
	<title>TSA?</title>
	<author>angularbanjo</author>
	<datestamp>1260263100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>
I never realised that the Tourette Syndrome Association had such power.  Who the f*** gave them that?  ********!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I never realised that the Tourette Syndrome Association had such power .
Who the f * * * gave them that ?
* * * * * * * * !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I never realised that the Tourette Syndrome Association had such power.
Who the f*** gave them that?
********!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362040</id>
	<title>Sloppy Slashdot editors...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260210900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sloppy Slashdot editors...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sloppy Slashdot editors.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sloppy Slashdot editors...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363010</id>
	<title>Re:The TSA redacting process</title>
	<author>jimicus</author>
	<datestamp>1260266580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When you enter the line to the security gate a TSA numpty checks your boarding pass to make sure you are allowed to join the line. Everyone joining the line has their boarding pass checked, this is a piece of paper often printed on a computer that says what flight you are on, its just about the easiest thing to fake in the history of fakery.</p></div><p>Maybe it's different around where you are, but in every airport I've been to a barcode on the boarding pass is scanned to ensure it's valid.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When you enter the line to the security gate a TSA numpty checks your boarding pass to make sure you are allowed to join the line .
Everyone joining the line has their boarding pass checked , this is a piece of paper often printed on a computer that says what flight you are on , its just about the easiest thing to fake in the history of fakery.Maybe it 's different around where you are , but in every airport I 've been to a barcode on the boarding pass is scanned to ensure it 's valid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you enter the line to the security gate a TSA numpty checks your boarding pass to make sure you are allowed to join the line.
Everyone joining the line has their boarding pass checked, this is a piece of paper often printed on a computer that says what flight you are on, its just about the easiest thing to fake in the history of fakery.Maybe it's different around where you are, but in every airport I've been to a barcode on the boarding pass is scanned to ensure it's valid.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362136</id>
	<title>If you think this is incompetence</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260211860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just wait until they try their hand at Healthcare.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just wait until they try their hand at Healthcare .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just wait until they try their hand at Healthcare.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363114</id>
	<title>Re:why are they so scared about xray monitors?</title>
	<author>Chief Camel Breeder</author>
	<datestamp>1260268200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Third guess: X-ray machines are very good at finding weapons in luggage <em>unless</em> said luggage is carefully arranged to confuse the view. To get the right arrangement you'd have to study some of the radiograms to see what worked.</p><p>Personal experience supports this. My laptop back-pack, which is full of cables, chargers and peripherals, usually goes through security unchallenged, <em>except</em> when it gets jumbled such that the security person can't work out what they're seeing; then they search. I often get a look at the screen while I'm waiting for it to come through (screens not concealed in most European airports). When it passes, I can identify my stuff. When it's searched, I can't.</p><p>This may be one of the rare, non-theatrical parts of the operation. But I still don't see why this particular regulation was redacted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Third guess : X-ray machines are very good at finding weapons in luggage unless said luggage is carefully arranged to confuse the view .
To get the right arrangement you 'd have to study some of the radiograms to see what worked.Personal experience supports this .
My laptop back-pack , which is full of cables , chargers and peripherals , usually goes through security unchallenged , except when it gets jumbled such that the security person ca n't work out what they 're seeing ; then they search .
I often get a look at the screen while I 'm waiting for it to come through ( screens not concealed in most European airports ) .
When it passes , I can identify my stuff .
When it 's searched , I ca n't.This may be one of the rare , non-theatrical parts of the operation .
But I still do n't see why this particular regulation was redacted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Third guess: X-ray machines are very good at finding weapons in luggage unless said luggage is carefully arranged to confuse the view.
To get the right arrangement you'd have to study some of the radiograms to see what worked.Personal experience supports this.
My laptop back-pack, which is full of cables, chargers and peripherals, usually goes through security unchallenged, except when it gets jumbled such that the security person can't work out what they're seeing; then they search.
I often get a look at the screen while I'm waiting for it to come through (screens not concealed in most European airports).
When it passes, I can identify my stuff.
When it's searched, I can't.This may be one of the rare, non-theatrical parts of the operation.
But I still don't see why this particular regulation was redacted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30366362</id>
	<title>Re:One interesting redacted section</title>
	<author>molo</author>
	<datestamp>1260292440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF?  Why isn't Saudi Arabia or Egypt on this list?!?  You know, the two countries that actually had citizens participate in the 9/11 attacks!?</p><p>-molo</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF ?
Why is n't Saudi Arabia or Egypt on this list ? ! ?
You know , the two countries that actually had citizens participate in the 9/11 attacks !
? -molo</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF?
Why isn't Saudi Arabia or Egypt on this list?!?
You know, the two countries that actually had citizens participate in the 9/11 attacks!
?-molo</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30373580</id>
	<title>Plausible Deniability</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1260287220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>How stupid are these people?! </i></p><p>Could be.  Or maybe somebody inside TSA wanted this to be public but has plausible deniability about leaking it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How stupid are these people ? !
Could be .
Or maybe somebody inside TSA wanted this to be public but has plausible deniability about leaking it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How stupid are these people?!
Could be.
Or maybe somebody inside TSA wanted this to be public but has plausible deniability about leaking it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30367966</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>Zerth</author>
	<datestamp>1260299580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The ones I found most interesting are where they instruct them to mark the boarding pass in a way that indicates the person carrying it can breeze through security as an unchecked selectee.</p><p>I hope this is different at every airport, but I have a feeling that it isn't different and that TSA employees carry pens with them when they fly so they can mark themselves exempt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The ones I found most interesting are where they instruct them to mark the boarding pass in a way that indicates the person carrying it can breeze through security as an unchecked selectee.I hope this is different at every airport , but I have a feeling that it is n't different and that TSA employees carry pens with them when they fly so they can mark themselves exempt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ones I found most interesting are where they instruct them to mark the boarding pass in a way that indicates the person carrying it can breeze through security as an unchecked selectee.I hope this is different at every airport, but I have a feeling that it isn't different and that TSA employees carry pens with them when they fly so they can mark themselves exempt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30369768</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>poofmeisterp</author>
	<datestamp>1260263940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>On what planet is it necessary to keep facts like these secret?</p></div><p>Assuming that this information is accurate (what you posted), it is simple to see that this is YET ANOTHER case of "making people feel good."</p><p>The "selectees" are designated to be searched so that the "people" feel comfortable that everyone is being screened.  Um, except for the flight crew members.  That may be up to no good.  Or drunk.  Who knows?</p><p>You'll know when you take that flight.</p><p>That doesn't scare me.  If you do the math, the probability of being in one of the dangerous flights where terrorist activity is induced is minimal.  If I happen to be on one of those flights where a pilot decides to take the plane down using something in an aerosol bottle, that's how I'll die.  You know, after I wake up tomorrow morning, a truck could skid off the road and crash into the building I live in and kill me.  What are the odds?  Next to nil.</p><p>People are always freaked.  Logic and reason is beyond the capacity of most people these days.  That's unfortunate.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On what planet is it necessary to keep facts like these secret ? Assuming that this information is accurate ( what you posted ) , it is simple to see that this is YET ANOTHER case of " making people feel good .
" The " selectees " are designated to be searched so that the " people " feel comfortable that everyone is being screened .
Um , except for the flight crew members .
That may be up to no good .
Or drunk .
Who knows ? You 'll know when you take that flight.That does n't scare me .
If you do the math , the probability of being in one of the dangerous flights where terrorist activity is induced is minimal .
If I happen to be on one of those flights where a pilot decides to take the plane down using something in an aerosol bottle , that 's how I 'll die .
You know , after I wake up tomorrow morning , a truck could skid off the road and crash into the building I live in and kill me .
What are the odds ?
Next to nil.People are always freaked .
Logic and reason is beyond the capacity of most people these days .
That 's unfortunate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On what planet is it necessary to keep facts like these secret?Assuming that this information is accurate (what you posted), it is simple to see that this is YET ANOTHER case of "making people feel good.
"The "selectees" are designated to be searched so that the "people" feel comfortable that everyone is being screened.
Um, except for the flight crew members.
That may be up to no good.
Or drunk.
Who knows?You'll know when you take that flight.That doesn't scare me.
If you do the math, the probability of being in one of the dangerous flights where terrorist activity is induced is minimal.
If I happen to be on one of those flights where a pilot decides to take the plane down using something in an aerosol bottle, that's how I'll die.
You know, after I wake up tomorrow morning, a truck could skid off the road and crash into the building I live in and kill me.
What are the odds?
Next to nil.People are always freaked.
Logic and reason is beyond the capacity of most people these days.
That's unfortunate.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363272</id>
	<title>Re:TSA?</title>
	<author>smcn</author>
	<datestamp>1260270840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/faq/editorial.shtml#ed850" title="slashdot.org">RTFFAQ (that's "read the fucking frequently asked questions", in case that acronym isn't of "global significance")</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RTFFAQ ( that 's " read the fucking frequently asked questions " , in case that acronym is n't of " global significance " ) [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RTFFAQ (that's "read the fucking frequently asked questions", in case that acronym isn't of "global significance") [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364968</id>
	<title>Re:TSA?</title>
	<author>npsimons</author>
	<datestamp>1260286620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Half the time significance isn't even a requirement.</p></div></blockquote><p>Thankfully.  Can you imagine what slashdot in the early days would have been like if they went by Wikipedia's "notability guidelines"?  "Pfft, Linux, that's not notable, delete all articles about it.".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Half the time significance is n't even a requirement.Thankfully .
Can you imagine what slashdot in the early days would have been like if they went by Wikipedia 's " notability guidelines " ?
" Pfft , Linux , that 's not notable , delete all articles about it .
" .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Half the time significance isn't even a requirement.Thankfully.
Can you imagine what slashdot in the early days would have been like if they went by Wikipedia's "notability guidelines"?
"Pfft, Linux, that's not notable, delete all articles about it.
".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363104</id>
	<title>Re:why are they so scared about xray monitors?</title>
	<author>mr\_gorkajuice</author>
	<datestamp>1260267960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's exactly is the difference between your first and second guess?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's exactly is the difference between your first and second guess ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's exactly is the difference between your first and second guess?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364384</id>
	<title>Re:Actual Link to the zip</title>
	<author>Bourdain</author>
	<datestamp>1260283560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>was it the prisoners on an island with a boat one?  that's the only game I've ever seen like that</htmltext>
<tokenext>was it the prisoners on an island with a boat one ?
that 's the only game I 've ever seen like that</tokentext>
<sentencetext>was it the prisoners on an island with a boat one?
that's the only game I've ever seen like that</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365052</id>
	<title>All Are Equal?</title>
	<author>Tokolosh</author>
	<datestamp>1260286980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the USA we pride ourselves in throwing off parasitic royalty and that everyone is equal.  To become a naturalized citizen you have to renounce your titles.  So why do sundry "dignitaries" get exemption from screening?  If I have to take off my shoes to enter the portals of transportation, then so should everyone, from the President down.  What is so special about a lieutenant-governor's wife, anyway?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the USA we pride ourselves in throwing off parasitic royalty and that everyone is equal .
To become a naturalized citizen you have to renounce your titles .
So why do sundry " dignitaries " get exemption from screening ?
If I have to take off my shoes to enter the portals of transportation , then so should everyone , from the President down .
What is so special about a lieutenant-governor 's wife , anyway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the USA we pride ourselves in throwing off parasitic royalty and that everyone is equal.
To become a naturalized citizen you have to renounce your titles.
So why do sundry "dignitaries" get exemption from screening?
If I have to take off my shoes to enter the portals of transportation, then so should everyone, from the President down.
What is so special about a lieutenant-governor's wife, anyway?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30403414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30366848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30368284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30405308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30367664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30373580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30367502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30370026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30366362
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30367966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30367348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30373478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365236
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30366500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30367438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30369234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30369768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364898
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30369760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30370612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30369510
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_0057253_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30366870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30370026
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362346
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30367502
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30367664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363014
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362022
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30366362
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30405308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365456
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362534
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30373580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362496
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362262
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362310
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30367438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30367966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362662
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30403414
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30370612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30369768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362164
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362654
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364640
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30366500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30373478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30367348
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362482
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30366848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363010
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362866
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362048
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362528
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30366870
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365152
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364384
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30368284
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30369510
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363320
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363868
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365292
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362888
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30363992
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362520
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30365236
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30369760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361960
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362026
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30369234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362292
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362746
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361894
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362068
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362680
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362298
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30364898
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362724
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30361976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362222
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362472
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_0057253.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_0057253.30362656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
