<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_07_1729236</id>
	<title>Zombie Pigs First, Hibernating Soldiers Next</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1260183960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>ColdWetDog writes <i>"Wired is running a story on DARPA's effort to stave off battlefield casualties by <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/12/pentagon-zombie-pigs-first-then-hibernating-gis/">turning injured soldiers into zombies</a> by injecting them with a cocktail of one chemical or another (details to be announced). From the article, 'Dr. Fossum predicts that each soldier will carry a syringe into combat zones or remote areas, and medic teams will be equipped with several. A single injection will minimize metabolic needs, de-animating injured troops by shutting down brain and heart function. Once treatment can be carried out, they'll be "re-animated" and &mdash; hopefully &mdash; as good as new.' If it doesn't pan out we can at least get zombie bacon and spam."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>ColdWetDog writes " Wired is running a story on DARPA 's effort to stave off battlefield casualties by turning injured soldiers into zombies by injecting them with a cocktail of one chemical or another ( details to be announced ) .
From the article , 'Dr .
Fossum predicts that each soldier will carry a syringe into combat zones or remote areas , and medic teams will be equipped with several .
A single injection will minimize metabolic needs , de-animating injured troops by shutting down brain and heart function .
Once treatment can be carried out , they 'll be " re-animated " and    hopefully    as good as new .
' If it does n't pan out we can at least get zombie bacon and spam .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ColdWetDog writes "Wired is running a story on DARPA's effort to stave off battlefield casualties by turning injured soldiers into zombies by injecting them with a cocktail of one chemical or another (details to be announced).
From the article, 'Dr.
Fossum predicts that each soldier will carry a syringe into combat zones or remote areas, and medic teams will be equipped with several.
A single injection will minimize metabolic needs, de-animating injured troops by shutting down brain and heart function.
Once treatment can be carried out, they'll be "re-animated" and — hopefully — as good as new.
' If it doesn't pan out we can at least get zombie bacon and spam.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360212</id>
	<title>what could possibly go wrong?</title>
	<author>blackplatypus</author>
	<datestamp>1260195300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, whats with the missing tag? if any story ever deserves the "what could possibly go wrong" tag...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , whats with the missing tag ?
if any story ever deserves the " what could possibly go wrong " tag.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, whats with the missing tag?
if any story ever deserves the "what could possibly go wrong" tag...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360094</id>
	<title>Re:Don't do it</title>
	<author>an unsound mind</author>
	<datestamp>1260194160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go without reviving long enough and you'll be dead for good, even with this stuff.</p><p>And a single bullet in the right spot will convert "low metabolic function" into "fully dead", 100\%, guaranteed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go without reviving long enough and you 'll be dead for good , even with this stuff.And a single bullet in the right spot will convert " low metabolic function " into " fully dead " , 100 \ % , guaranteed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go without reviving long enough and you'll be dead for good, even with this stuff.And a single bullet in the right spot will convert "low metabolic function" into "fully dead", 100\%, guaranteed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360716</id>
	<title>Re:are we weakening ours ability to fight?</title>
	<author>Runefox</author>
	<datestamp>1260198960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I realize this is a bit of a troll, but I'd like to point out that field hospitals, medics, and battlefield treatment have existed in some form or another at least as far back as the time of the Roman Empire over two millennia ago, and indeed the Romans in particular had extensive knowledge of herbs and medicine in general. I'm fairly sure that this isn't exactly a new concept, here, but if you'd rather people died on the field of honour rather than keeping casualties to a minimum where possible, then hey, you're welcome to go fight in Iraq or Afghanistan and deny receiving medical attention when an unseen IED or RPG ambush blows apart your convoy because "in war people die".</p><p>It's true that people die in war, but that doesn't mean the number of people who do die can't be reduced. Should development of UAV's and bomb disposal robots be halted as a waste of money and instead use bomb squads and fighter/recon sorties because people are supposed to be dying?</p><p>In World War II, Japan learned a harsh lesson with regard to the preservation of the lives of its combatants. One major example, when the bulk of their carrier force was lost at Midway, so, too, was the bulk of their most experienced fighter pilots. That fact alone is likely to have cost them the war. Their disregard for pilot safety in aircraft design, in ship design (the carrier decks were thinly-armoured, the hangars were filled with explosives and fuel, and much of the people below deck at the time of their sinking were vaporized), and in philosophy, cost them the lives of their finest pilots and warriors. Would you ask of the people serving in the armed forces to place valour and honour before life like the Japanese did? To waste their training, their skill, their experience, for glory, in the name of "strengthening the ability to fight a war"?</p><p>Saving the lives of wounded soldiers is a must. It might be true that things like getting an arm or a leg blown off limits the quality of life you can expect after you recover, but it's also true that getting shot in the shoulder or the neck might not cause permanent damage, but might also cause heavy blood loss. Something like what's being talked about in the article would help save lives in these situations by reducing the soldier's heart rate and other vitals enough to prolong his or her ability to survive, particularly during an engagement where immediate medical attention might not be possible. So instead of having someone shot in the neck and bleeding out in a few minutes, you inject them with this and exponentially increase the window of opportunity to save their life. That's not being weak - That's being smart.</p><p>Besides, if war was only about killing as many of the enemy as possible, it'd come down to nuclear exchange as a first option. That sort of mindset is only applicable during a state of total war - When do you think was the last time that happened? And besides, even then, in order to kill more of the other guy, you need to make sure that less of your guys are killed, too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I realize this is a bit of a troll , but I 'd like to point out that field hospitals , medics , and battlefield treatment have existed in some form or another at least as far back as the time of the Roman Empire over two millennia ago , and indeed the Romans in particular had extensive knowledge of herbs and medicine in general .
I 'm fairly sure that this is n't exactly a new concept , here , but if you 'd rather people died on the field of honour rather than keeping casualties to a minimum where possible , then hey , you 're welcome to go fight in Iraq or Afghanistan and deny receiving medical attention when an unseen IED or RPG ambush blows apart your convoy because " in war people die " .It 's true that people die in war , but that does n't mean the number of people who do die ca n't be reduced .
Should development of UAV 's and bomb disposal robots be halted as a waste of money and instead use bomb squads and fighter/recon sorties because people are supposed to be dying ? In World War II , Japan learned a harsh lesson with regard to the preservation of the lives of its combatants .
One major example , when the bulk of their carrier force was lost at Midway , so , too , was the bulk of their most experienced fighter pilots .
That fact alone is likely to have cost them the war .
Their disregard for pilot safety in aircraft design , in ship design ( the carrier decks were thinly-armoured , the hangars were filled with explosives and fuel , and much of the people below deck at the time of their sinking were vaporized ) , and in philosophy , cost them the lives of their finest pilots and warriors .
Would you ask of the people serving in the armed forces to place valour and honour before life like the Japanese did ?
To waste their training , their skill , their experience , for glory , in the name of " strengthening the ability to fight a war " ? Saving the lives of wounded soldiers is a must .
It might be true that things like getting an arm or a leg blown off limits the quality of life you can expect after you recover , but it 's also true that getting shot in the shoulder or the neck might not cause permanent damage , but might also cause heavy blood loss .
Something like what 's being talked about in the article would help save lives in these situations by reducing the soldier 's heart rate and other vitals enough to prolong his or her ability to survive , particularly during an engagement where immediate medical attention might not be possible .
So instead of having someone shot in the neck and bleeding out in a few minutes , you inject them with this and exponentially increase the window of opportunity to save their life .
That 's not being weak - That 's being smart.Besides , if war was only about killing as many of the enemy as possible , it 'd come down to nuclear exchange as a first option .
That sort of mindset is only applicable during a state of total war - When do you think was the last time that happened ?
And besides , even then , in order to kill more of the other guy , you need to make sure that less of your guys are killed , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I realize this is a bit of a troll, but I'd like to point out that field hospitals, medics, and battlefield treatment have existed in some form or another at least as far back as the time of the Roman Empire over two millennia ago, and indeed the Romans in particular had extensive knowledge of herbs and medicine in general.
I'm fairly sure that this isn't exactly a new concept, here, but if you'd rather people died on the field of honour rather than keeping casualties to a minimum where possible, then hey, you're welcome to go fight in Iraq or Afghanistan and deny receiving medical attention when an unseen IED or RPG ambush blows apart your convoy because "in war people die".It's true that people die in war, but that doesn't mean the number of people who do die can't be reduced.
Should development of UAV's and bomb disposal robots be halted as a waste of money and instead use bomb squads and fighter/recon sorties because people are supposed to be dying?In World War II, Japan learned a harsh lesson with regard to the preservation of the lives of its combatants.
One major example, when the bulk of their carrier force was lost at Midway, so, too, was the bulk of their most experienced fighter pilots.
That fact alone is likely to have cost them the war.
Their disregard for pilot safety in aircraft design, in ship design (the carrier decks were thinly-armoured, the hangars were filled with explosives and fuel, and much of the people below deck at the time of their sinking were vaporized), and in philosophy, cost them the lives of their finest pilots and warriors.
Would you ask of the people serving in the armed forces to place valour and honour before life like the Japanese did?
To waste their training, their skill, their experience, for glory, in the name of "strengthening the ability to fight a war"?Saving the lives of wounded soldiers is a must.
It might be true that things like getting an arm or a leg blown off limits the quality of life you can expect after you recover, but it's also true that getting shot in the shoulder or the neck might not cause permanent damage, but might also cause heavy blood loss.
Something like what's being talked about in the article would help save lives in these situations by reducing the soldier's heart rate and other vitals enough to prolong his or her ability to survive, particularly during an engagement where immediate medical attention might not be possible.
So instead of having someone shot in the neck and bleeding out in a few minutes, you inject them with this and exponentially increase the window of opportunity to save their life.
That's not being weak - That's being smart.Besides, if war was only about killing as many of the enemy as possible, it'd come down to nuclear exchange as a first option.
That sort of mindset is only applicable during a state of total war - When do you think was the last time that happened?
And besides, even then, in order to kill more of the other guy, you need to make sure that less of your guys are killed, too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361032</id>
	<title>Re:Don't do it</title>
	<author>Kral\_Blbec</author>
	<datestamp>1260201420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they had to use the needle in the first place then they are in a situation where they are already going to die. Its not important how many die as a result of using it, its about how many survive thanks to it.<br> <br> its like the stimpaks back in StarCraft. Sure you might die after using it, but if you do its not because you used it, its because you got shot. However if you do use it then your chance of surviving, even though you were shot, increase.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they had to use the needle in the first place then they are in a situation where they are already going to die .
Its not important how many die as a result of using it , its about how many survive thanks to it .
its like the stimpaks back in StarCraft .
Sure you might die after using it , but if you do its not because you used it , its because you got shot .
However if you do use it then your chance of surviving , even though you were shot , increase .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they had to use the needle in the first place then they are in a situation where they are already going to die.
Its not important how many die as a result of using it, its about how many survive thanks to it.
its like the stimpaks back in StarCraft.
Sure you might die after using it, but if you do its not because you used it, its because you got shot.
However if you do use it then your chance of surviving, even though you were shot, increase.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30368898</id>
	<title>Re:The Future Of Medicine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260303180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Their problem will be massive overpopulation..</p></div><p>What makes you think this is not <b>our</b> problem already ?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Their problem will be massive overpopulation..What makes you think this is not our problem already ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their problem will be massive overpopulation..What makes you think this is not our problem already ?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360138</id>
	<title>.. if it doesn't pan out ..</title>
	<author>BradyB</author>
	<datestamp>1260194460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the write up:</p><p><i>If it doesn't pan out we can at least get zombie bacon and spam</i></p><p>So where does the bacon and spam come from the Pigs or the Zombie soldiers?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the write up : If it does n't pan out we can at least get zombie bacon and spamSo where does the bacon and spam come from the Pigs or the Zombie soldiers ?
: -/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the write up:If it doesn't pan out we can at least get zombie bacon and spamSo where does the bacon and spam come from the Pigs or the Zombie soldiers?
:-/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360070</id>
	<title>Re:Oxidative damage.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260193860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can see how this will end - they will use it to susspend great armies in hibernation waiting for the time when they are needed.  But someething will go wrong and they will wake on their own, attack us and eat our brains! Oh the humanity!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see how this will end - they will use it to susspend great armies in hibernation waiting for the time when they are needed .
But someething will go wrong and they will wake on their own , attack us and eat our brains !
Oh the humanity !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see how this will end - they will use it to susspend great armies in hibernation waiting for the time when they are needed.
But someething will go wrong and they will wake on their own, attack us and eat our brains!
Oh the humanity!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30501800</id>
	<title>Re:The Future Of Medicine</title>
	<author>uninformedLuddite</author>
	<datestamp>1261236060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Does anyone else have any ideas how we might go about solving the population problem should we obtain the ability to keep people alive much longer and fight back death? A solution that can realistically be achieved in at most, the next 91 years.</p></div><p>Parent's choose to have kids. One child born means the father is then killed. Next child would be artificial insemination by saved semen from the father. Upon birth of second child mother is terminated. Stable population. In cases of triplets or greater then the one with the least weight is killed. Really very simple and humane.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone else have any ideas how we might go about solving the population problem should we obtain the ability to keep people alive much longer and fight back death ?
A solution that can realistically be achieved in at most , the next 91 years.Parent 's choose to have kids .
One child born means the father is then killed .
Next child would be artificial insemination by saved semen from the father .
Upon birth of second child mother is terminated .
Stable population .
In cases of triplets or greater then the one with the least weight is killed .
Really very simple and humane .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone else have any ideas how we might go about solving the population problem should we obtain the ability to keep people alive much longer and fight back death?
A solution that can realistically be achieved in at most, the next 91 years.Parent's choose to have kids.
One child born means the father is then killed.
Next child would be artificial insemination by saved semen from the father.
Upon birth of second child mother is terminated.
Stable population.
In cases of triplets or greater then the one with the least weight is killed.
Really very simple and humane.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359602</id>
	<title>Re:OMG</title>
	<author>illumastorm</author>
	<datestamp>1260190560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I, for one, welcome our delicious, self-propelling into mouths, bacon overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one , welcome our delicious , self-propelling into mouths , bacon overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one, welcome our delicious, self-propelling into mouths, bacon overlords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359166</id>
	<title>Not to be confused</title>
	<author>Dyinobal</author>
	<datestamp>1260188100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not to be confused with their re-animator project, which saw only mild success. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BnOUOkcr9c" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BnOUOkcr9c</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to be confused with their re-animator project , which saw only mild success .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 7BnOUOkcr9c [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to be confused with their re-animator project, which saw only mild success.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BnOUOkcr9c [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359684</id>
	<title>Wonder if.....</title>
	<author>Stupid McStupidson</author>
	<datestamp>1260191160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext> The Larramans Organ and Sus-An Membrane are far behind.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Larramans Organ and Sus-An Membrane are far behind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> The Larramans Organ and Sus-An Membrane are far behind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359616</id>
	<title>Re:Opposite of a Zombie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260190680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's Hiberzine! (see: John Ringo)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's Hiberzine !
( see : John Ringo )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's Hiberzine!
(see: John Ringo)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360542</id>
	<title>Re:are we weakening ours ability to fight?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260197760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's wrong with your shift key and caps lock key? It's fitting that the quality of the appearance of your post matches the quality of the content. Firstly,</p><blockquote><div><p> <b>No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country.</b> He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country. </p><p>- <tt>General George S Patton</tt></p></div> </blockquote><p>Secondly, smart people aren't some kind of raw resource that can be deployed anywhere and set to work. In this case, the smart <b>medical</b> people have discovered a way to help keep soldiers alive. Those people can be taken off medical research and reassigned to engineering a super-duper-kill-everyone-bomb. Now, you could argue that it's a matter of moving funds - but this brings me to my third point. We have powerful-enough weapons to kill every living creature on this planet dozens of times over. Our weakness is not in our ability to kill, our weakness is in the ability to <i>discriminately</i> kill - so our R&amp;D only has limited potential to help here (there are smart-bombs and aerial drones et al, but the main thing is intelligence). Fourthly, you're ignoring things like morale. Would you be so willing to sign up/fight/etc if your governments' policy was "fuck 'em, they're dead already"? Of course not, you're just some snotty, barely-literate punk. Finally,</p><blockquote><div><p>the quality of life of those saved is often so poor as to question whether they were really done any favors by saving them. there are worse things than death<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p></div></blockquote><p>That's not your call, that's their call. This is only an argument for euthanasia (in cases where they're unable to kill themselves). I'm sure I'm not alone here on slashdot when I express the sentiment that <b>the government has no right to decide the quality of an individual's life</b>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's wrong with your shift key and caps lock key ?
It 's fitting that the quality of the appearance of your post matches the quality of the content .
Firstly , No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country .
He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country .
- General George S Patton Secondly , smart people are n't some kind of raw resource that can be deployed anywhere and set to work .
In this case , the smart medical people have discovered a way to help keep soldiers alive .
Those people can be taken off medical research and reassigned to engineering a super-duper-kill-everyone-bomb .
Now , you could argue that it 's a matter of moving funds - but this brings me to my third point .
We have powerful-enough weapons to kill every living creature on this planet dozens of times over .
Our weakness is not in our ability to kill , our weakness is in the ability to discriminately kill - so our R&amp;D only has limited potential to help here ( there are smart-bombs and aerial drones et al , but the main thing is intelligence ) .
Fourthly , you 're ignoring things like morale .
Would you be so willing to sign up/fight/etc if your governments ' policy was " fuck 'em , they 're dead already " ?
Of course not , you 're just some snotty , barely-literate punk .
Finally,the quality of life of those saved is often so poor as to question whether they were really done any favors by saving them .
there are worse things than death ....That 's not your call , that 's their call .
This is only an argument for euthanasia ( in cases where they 're unable to kill themselves ) .
I 'm sure I 'm not alone here on slashdot when I express the sentiment that the government has no right to decide the quality of an individual 's life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's wrong with your shift key and caps lock key?
It's fitting that the quality of the appearance of your post matches the quality of the content.
Firstly, No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country.
He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country.
- General George S Patton Secondly, smart people aren't some kind of raw resource that can be deployed anywhere and set to work.
In this case, the smart medical people have discovered a way to help keep soldiers alive.
Those people can be taken off medical research and reassigned to engineering a super-duper-kill-everyone-bomb.
Now, you could argue that it's a matter of moving funds - but this brings me to my third point.
We have powerful-enough weapons to kill every living creature on this planet dozens of times over.
Our weakness is not in our ability to kill, our weakness is in the ability to discriminately kill - so our R&amp;D only has limited potential to help here (there are smart-bombs and aerial drones et al, but the main thing is intelligence).
Fourthly, you're ignoring things like morale.
Would you be so willing to sign up/fight/etc if your governments' policy was "fuck 'em, they're dead already"?
Of course not, you're just some snotty, barely-literate punk.
Finally,the quality of life of those saved is often so poor as to question whether they were really done any favors by saving them.
there are worse things than death ....That's not your call, that's their call.
This is only an argument for euthanasia (in cases where they're unable to kill themselves).
I'm sure I'm not alone here on slashdot when I express the sentiment that the government has no right to decide the quality of an individual's life.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359790</id>
	<title>Long Duration Space Flight</title>
	<author>Usually Unlucky </author>
	<datestamp>1260191880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Couldn't this be tweaked and used as a method of hibernation to stave off boredom and conserve supplies for long duration space flight?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could n't this be tweaked and used as a method of hibernation to stave off boredom and conserve supplies for long duration space flight ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Couldn't this be tweaked and used as a method of hibernation to stave off boredom and conserve supplies for long duration space flight?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30362824</id>
	<title>Re:Opposite of a Zombie</title>
	<author>zefciu</author>
	<datestamp>1260264120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Agreed. I think "zombie" became too abused term today. Neither Jesus nor hibernating squirrell can qualify as "zombie".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
I think " zombie " became too abused term today .
Neither Jesus nor hibernating squirrell can qualify as " zombie " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
I think "zombie" became too abused term today.
Neither Jesus nor hibernating squirrell can qualify as "zombie".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359650</id>
	<title>Re:Opposite of a Zombie</title>
	<author>samsonian</author>
	<datestamp>1260190920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh please! Tomayto....Tomaato.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh please !
Tomayto....Tomaato .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh please!
Tomayto....Tomaato.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359236</id>
	<title>Use it on the enemy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260188400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Put it in some sort of new-millennium dart gun. Then you can safety advance on the enemy and humanely cut their throats while they sleep.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Put it in some sort of new-millennium dart gun .
Then you can safety advance on the enemy and humanely cut their throats while they sleep .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Put it in some sort of new-millennium dart gun.
Then you can safety advance on the enemy and humanely cut their throats while they sleep.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360748</id>
	<title>Re:are we weakening ours ability to fight?</title>
	<author>19thNervousBreakdown</author>
	<datestamp>1260199140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>our efforts, to paraphrase patton, should be to make sure that as many as possible of the other guys die, and putting so much emphasis on saving all of our guys will impede that effort.</p></div><p>No matter how much killing one soldier can do, two can do more.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>our efforts , to paraphrase patton , should be to make sure that as many as possible of the other guys die , and putting so much emphasis on saving all of our guys will impede that effort.No matter how much killing one soldier can do , two can do more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>our efforts, to paraphrase patton, should be to make sure that as many as possible of the other guys die, and putting so much emphasis on saving all of our guys will impede that effort.No matter how much killing one soldier can do, two can do more.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360234</id>
	<title>Re:Brain damage?</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1260195540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Brains in soldiers... lol. Next you tell me about Fox News watchers who know propositional calculus. ^^</i></p><p>There are plenty of smart folks in the military - based on odds, there are probably folks in the Air Force with a better grasp of mathematics than yourself.  What they lack is the ability to apply that knowledge to the concept that they're supporting destructive and unconstitutional imperial military adventures.</p><p>Sort of like MSNBC viewers who haven't figured out that Keynesian economics is a giant Ponzi scheme meant to grant undue power to central banks, err, I mean governments.</p><p>And like any distribution, there are no doubt grunts who earn that name.  Age also plays a large role.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Brains in soldiers... lol. Next you tell me about Fox News watchers who know propositional calculus .
^ ^ There are plenty of smart folks in the military - based on odds , there are probably folks in the Air Force with a better grasp of mathematics than yourself .
What they lack is the ability to apply that knowledge to the concept that they 're supporting destructive and unconstitutional imperial military adventures.Sort of like MSNBC viewers who have n't figured out that Keynesian economics is a giant Ponzi scheme meant to grant undue power to central banks , err , I mean governments.And like any distribution , there are no doubt grunts who earn that name .
Age also plays a large role .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brains in soldiers... lol. Next you tell me about Fox News watchers who know propositional calculus.
^^There are plenty of smart folks in the military - based on odds, there are probably folks in the Air Force with a better grasp of mathematics than yourself.
What they lack is the ability to apply that knowledge to the concept that they're supporting destructive and unconstitutional imperial military adventures.Sort of like MSNBC viewers who haven't figured out that Keynesian economics is a giant Ponzi scheme meant to grant undue power to central banks, err, I mean governments.And like any distribution, there are no doubt grunts who earn that name.
Age also plays a large role.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360696</id>
	<title>Re:are we weakening ours ability to fight?</title>
	<author>opposabledumbs</author>
	<datestamp>1260198840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In a low-tech, low-cost, grunts-with-guns battle, sure. All you want is for more of your guys to survive, and you've won. Soldiers in these armies are easily replaceable: give a gun to a civilian, drill them 'till they lose the use of independent thought, and you've replaced the dead soldier.</p><p>But modern armies are high tech, and that means that there is a lot of training invested in the men on the ground. Lose them, you lose all the training and experience that they had. So keeping them alive and possibly able to fight again is a big plus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In a low-tech , low-cost , grunts-with-guns battle , sure .
All you want is for more of your guys to survive , and you 've won .
Soldiers in these armies are easily replaceable : give a gun to a civilian , drill them 'till they lose the use of independent thought , and you 've replaced the dead soldier.But modern armies are high tech , and that means that there is a lot of training invested in the men on the ground .
Lose them , you lose all the training and experience that they had .
So keeping them alive and possibly able to fight again is a big plus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a low-tech, low-cost, grunts-with-guns battle, sure.
All you want is for more of your guys to survive, and you've won.
Soldiers in these armies are easily replaceable: give a gun to a civilian, drill them 'till they lose the use of independent thought, and you've replaced the dead soldier.But modern armies are high tech, and that means that there is a lot of training invested in the men on the ground.
Lose them, you lose all the training and experience that they had.
So keeping them alive and possibly able to fight again is a big plus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361040</id>
	<title>Why are all the experts on Slashdot?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260201540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Brain trauma is mysteriously simplified when explained by "our I.T. guy".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Brain trauma is mysteriously simplified when explained by " our I.T .
guy " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brain trauma is mysteriously simplified when explained by "our I.T.
guy".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30362468</id>
	<title>Re:Don't do it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260215760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh nozzz  COD world at war zombies will be teh reallzz</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh nozzz COD world at war zombies will be teh reallzz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh nozzz  COD world at war zombies will be teh reallzz</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363400</id>
	<title>Scr&#246;dingers cat?</title>
	<author>jurgemaister</author>
	<datestamp>1260272820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Am I the only one that get assosiations to a certain cat in a certain box, who's state is not alive nor dead?

I say: Commence the cat testing!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one that get assosiations to a certain cat in a certain box , who 's state is not alive nor dead ?
I say : Commence the cat testing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one that get assosiations to a certain cat in a certain box, who's state is not alive nor dead?
I say: Commence the cat testing!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360892</id>
	<title>Re:Opposite of a Zombie</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1260200280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, this is almost exactly like the original African myths. A witch-doctor supposedly could feed someone a potion to put them into a false death, they would be buried and then dug up later, a slave to the witch doctor. There's probably even a thread of truth to the tales.</p><p>The modern zombie is a more recent innovation, dating more or less to Dawn of the Dead. The real difference between this zombie and the mythic one is that here the human hopefully wakes up fully possessed of their senses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , this is almost exactly like the original African myths .
A witch-doctor supposedly could feed someone a potion to put them into a false death , they would be buried and then dug up later , a slave to the witch doctor .
There 's probably even a thread of truth to the tales.The modern zombie is a more recent innovation , dating more or less to Dawn of the Dead .
The real difference between this zombie and the mythic one is that here the human hopefully wakes up fully possessed of their senses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, this is almost exactly like the original African myths.
A witch-doctor supposedly could feed someone a potion to put them into a false death, they would be buried and then dug up later, a slave to the witch doctor.
There's probably even a thread of truth to the tales.The modern zombie is a more recent innovation, dating more or less to Dawn of the Dead.
The real difference between this zombie and the mythic one is that here the human hopefully wakes up fully possessed of their senses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30371260</id>
	<title>Re:are we weakening ours ability to fight?</title>
	<author>ex\_ottoyuhr</author>
	<datestamp>1260271140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's true that war is not about preserving the lives of your own soldiers; there is a word for the context in which an army's <i>first</i> concern is preserving the lives of its own soldiers, and that word is "peacetime." In addition to this, though, the Pentagon needs to concentrate on sparing civilians; the US military has made no attempts to minimize "collateral damage" -- civilians killed in the process of fighting off attackers -- over the course of the Iraq War.</p><p>Of course, it would also help if they also ensured that the US doesn't begin future wars without plans to win them in the <i>worst</i> case -- as opposed to just hoping for the best.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's true that war is not about preserving the lives of your own soldiers ; there is a word for the context in which an army 's first concern is preserving the lives of its own soldiers , and that word is " peacetime .
" In addition to this , though , the Pentagon needs to concentrate on sparing civilians ; the US military has made no attempts to minimize " collateral damage " -- civilians killed in the process of fighting off attackers -- over the course of the Iraq War.Of course , it would also help if they also ensured that the US does n't begin future wars without plans to win them in the worst case -- as opposed to just hoping for the best .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's true that war is not about preserving the lives of your own soldiers; there is a word for the context in which an army's first concern is preserving the lives of its own soldiers, and that word is "peacetime.
" In addition to this, though, the Pentagon needs to concentrate on sparing civilians; the US military has made no attempts to minimize "collateral damage" -- civilians killed in the process of fighting off attackers -- over the course of the Iraq War.Of course, it would also help if they also ensured that the US doesn't begin future wars without plans to win them in the worst case -- as opposed to just hoping for the best.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30362744</id>
	<title>Re:Damage Mechanism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260262920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here is what I see happening:<br>instead of using that drug to hibernate the wounded, I bet it will be used to hibernate the enemies, take them as prisoners, etc<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>or used in terrorist attacks, kidnapping hundreds of people<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>Remember, any technology gets reused in many different ways, it's cheaper to recycle a technology than invent a totally new one.<br>look at gps in cars for example</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is what I see happening : instead of using that drug to hibernate the wounded , I bet it will be used to hibernate the enemies , take them as prisoners , etc ...or used in terrorist attacks , kidnapping hundreds of people ...Remember , any technology gets reused in many different ways , it 's cheaper to recycle a technology than invent a totally new one.look at gps in cars for example</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is what I see happening:instead of using that drug to hibernate the wounded, I bet it will be used to hibernate the enemies, take them as prisoners, etc ...or used in terrorist attacks, kidnapping hundreds of people ...Remember, any technology gets reused in many different ways, it's cheaper to recycle a technology than invent a totally new one.look at gps in cars for example</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360704</id>
	<title>How to be a Billionaire/Trillionaire</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260198900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Buy some bonds + blue chip stocks and sleep for the next 50 years and become a billionaire!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Buy some bonds + blue chip stocks and sleep for the next 50 years and become a billionaire ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Buy some bonds + blue chip stocks and sleep for the next 50 years and become a billionaire!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359584</id>
	<title>Re:Don't do it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260190500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if it works, with 90\% success rate?</p><p>Here lies the danger.</p><p>When they are doing it with real humans, and can revive 90\% of the casualties, everyone would be rejoicing with echoes of "Hallelujah !!"</p><p>But what about the 10\% failure?</p><p>What if, among the 10\% failure there are those that are NOT dead, but unable to be revived?</p><p>Just buried them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if it works , with 90 \ % success rate ? Here lies the danger.When they are doing it with real humans , and can revive 90 \ % of the casualties , everyone would be rejoicing with echoes of " Hallelujah ! !
" But what about the 10 \ % failure ? What if , among the 10 \ % failure there are those that are NOT dead , but unable to be revived ? Just buried them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if it works, with 90\% success rate?Here lies the danger.When they are doing it with real humans, and can revive 90\% of the casualties, everyone would be rejoicing with echoes of "Hallelujah !!
"But what about the 10\% failure?What if, among the 10\% failure there are those that are NOT dead, but unable to be revived?Just buried them?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359682</id>
	<title>Re:Brain damage?</title>
	<author>tacarat</author>
	<datestamp>1260191160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Staving off death is one thing (and good); making life after injury worth living is another.</p></div><p>Worth repeating.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Staving off death is one thing ( and good ) ; making life after injury worth living is another.Worth repeating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Staving off death is one thing (and good); making life after injury worth living is another.Worth repeating.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359696</id>
	<title>Re:Brain damage?</title>
	<author>skine</author>
	<datestamp>1260191220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed.</p><p>The decrease in VA hospital funding is just disgraceful.</p><p>I may not agree with the war, but I will say that all persons subjected to the greatest physical and emotional harm in the service of the United States deserve the best available treatment at the expense of the federal government.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed.The decrease in VA hospital funding is just disgraceful.I may not agree with the war , but I will say that all persons subjected to the greatest physical and emotional harm in the service of the United States deserve the best available treatment at the expense of the federal government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.The decrease in VA hospital funding is just disgraceful.I may not agree with the war, but I will say that all persons subjected to the greatest physical and emotional harm in the service of the United States deserve the best available treatment at the expense of the federal government.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30366538</id>
	<title>Re:Don't do it</title>
	<author>Trukutu</author>
	<datestamp>1260293040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Universal Soldier???</htmltext>
<tokenext>Universal Soldier ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Universal Soldier??
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359944</id>
	<title>Re:Oxidative damage.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260193080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>some scientist, in Boston I believe, has successfully frozen beagles, and brought them back to life.</p></div><p>[Citation needed].  Sorry, that's just too interesting a claim to go uncommented.</p><p>I believe that dogs have been cooled to near-freezing temperatures, cardiovascular function temporarily halted, and revived after a few hours.   But their tissues remained unfrozen and their blood remained liquid the entire time.</p><p>Nobody, AFAIK, has successfully frozen and revived a mammal.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>some scientist , in Boston I believe , has successfully frozen beagles , and brought them back to life .
[ Citation needed ] .
Sorry , that 's just too interesting a claim to go uncommented.I believe that dogs have been cooled to near-freezing temperatures , cardiovascular function temporarily halted , and revived after a few hours .
But their tissues remained unfrozen and their blood remained liquid the entire time.Nobody , AFAIK , has successfully frozen and revived a mammal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>some scientist, in Boston I believe, has successfully frozen beagles, and brought them back to life.
[Citation needed].
Sorry, that's just too interesting a claim to go uncommented.I believe that dogs have been cooled to near-freezing temperatures, cardiovascular function temporarily halted, and revived after a few hours.
But their tissues remained unfrozen and their blood remained liquid the entire time.Nobody, AFAIK, has successfully frozen and revived a mammal.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359744</id>
	<title>"Field Ice Bath"</title>
	<author>jesusfr3Ak</author>
	<datestamp>1260191580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This seems like a really great idea to me - very similar to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heart\_transplant" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow"> the procedure for open heart surgery</a> [wikipedia.org], where patients are put into a bath of icewater to slow down their metabolism. I think this could save a lot of lives, and could be extended to other non-military applications, as TFA points out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This seems like a really great idea to me - very similar to the procedure for open heart surgery [ wikipedia.org ] , where patients are put into a bath of icewater to slow down their metabolism .
I think this could save a lot of lives , and could be extended to other non-military applications , as TFA points out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This seems like a really great idea to me - very similar to  the procedure for open heart surgery [wikipedia.org], where patients are put into a bath of icewater to slow down their metabolism.
I think this could save a lot of lives, and could be extended to other non-military applications, as TFA points out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359220</id>
	<title>OMG</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260188340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are going to end up with bacon that doesn't die!  And that would be a sin against humanity!</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are going to end up with bacon that does n't die !
And that would be a sin against humanity !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are going to end up with bacon that doesn't die!
And that would be a sin against humanity!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361136</id>
	<title>Re:The Future Of Medicine</title>
	<author>destroyer661</author>
	<datestamp>1260202440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Could be handy if you were already dead on scene and they got there fast enough as well. Roll up a bus full of freezers to toss corpses in, then unload them at the hospital where they can be properly tended to without having to rush or worry about 4-5 patients crashing all at once in critical care.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could be handy if you were already dead on scene and they got there fast enough as well .
Roll up a bus full of freezers to toss corpses in , then unload them at the hospital where they can be properly tended to without having to rush or worry about 4-5 patients crashing all at once in critical care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could be handy if you were already dead on scene and they got there fast enough as well.
Roll up a bus full of freezers to toss corpses in, then unload them at the hospital where they can be properly tended to without having to rush or worry about 4-5 patients crashing all at once in critical care.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360418</id>
	<title>Re:OMG</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260196920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's OK if you wash it between sittings.  I mean eatings.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's OK if you wash it between sittings .
I mean eatings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's OK if you wash it between sittings.
I mean eatings.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363120</id>
	<title>Re:Opposite of a Zombie</title>
	<author>julesh</author>
	<datestamp>1260268260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The terminology seems odd here. Isn't suspended animation pretty much the opposite of being a zombie? I mean zombies are the animated dead. Suspended animation makes you the unanimated living.</i></p><p>The origin of the zombie myth is (probably) a cocktail of drugs that a witch doctor would give to an enemy, which makes them appear to die (metabolic processes slow down to the point they're very hard to detect); then, after everyone thinks they're dead, the witch doctor revives them and claims that he now owns them as a slave.</p><p>The drugs in this case are probably derived from the same drugs that may originally have been used for making zombies, or are at least intended to have the same effects, although probably in a somewhat safer fashion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The terminology seems odd here .
Is n't suspended animation pretty much the opposite of being a zombie ?
I mean zombies are the animated dead .
Suspended animation makes you the unanimated living.The origin of the zombie myth is ( probably ) a cocktail of drugs that a witch doctor would give to an enemy , which makes them appear to die ( metabolic processes slow down to the point they 're very hard to detect ) ; then , after everyone thinks they 're dead , the witch doctor revives them and claims that he now owns them as a slave.The drugs in this case are probably derived from the same drugs that may originally have been used for making zombies , or are at least intended to have the same effects , although probably in a somewhat safer fashion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The terminology seems odd here.
Isn't suspended animation pretty much the opposite of being a zombie?
I mean zombies are the animated dead.
Suspended animation makes you the unanimated living.The origin of the zombie myth is (probably) a cocktail of drugs that a witch doctor would give to an enemy, which makes them appear to die (metabolic processes slow down to the point they're very hard to detect); then, after everyone thinks they're dead, the witch doctor revives them and claims that he now owns them as a slave.The drugs in this case are probably derived from the same drugs that may originally have been used for making zombies, or are at least intended to have the same effects, although probably in a somewhat safer fashion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359594</id>
	<title>It says in the Article that Squirrels do this....</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1260190500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always knew squirrels were vicious little demons from hell.</p><p>Squirrely Wrath!</p><p>Squirrely Wrath!</p><p>Squirrely Wrath!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always knew squirrels were vicious little demons from hell.Squirrely Wrath ! Squirrely Wrath ! Squirrely Wrath !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always knew squirrels were vicious little demons from hell.Squirrely Wrath!Squirrely Wrath!Squirrely Wrath!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30365338</id>
	<title>Re:Brain damage?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260288240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One of the biggies in this war is Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) - surviving explosions, surviving shots to the helmet - I wonder if we'll be swapping out a lot of dead soldiers for ones suffering extreme brain injury.</p></div><p>As long as those soldiers can still see Russia from their house and are willing to go rogue, I think 30\% of America will still vote for them when they run for President.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the biggies in this war is Traumatic Brain Injury ( TBI ) - surviving explosions , surviving shots to the helmet - I wonder if we 'll be swapping out a lot of dead soldiers for ones suffering extreme brain injury.As long as those soldiers can still see Russia from their house and are willing to go rogue , I think 30 \ % of America will still vote for them when they run for President .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the biggies in this war is Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) - surviving explosions, surviving shots to the helmet - I wonder if we'll be swapping out a lot of dead soldiers for ones suffering extreme brain injury.As long as those soldiers can still see Russia from their house and are willing to go rogue, I think 30\% of America will still vote for them when they run for President.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359210</id>
	<title>Damage Mechanism</title>
	<author>Renraku</author>
	<datestamp>1260188280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the main mechanisms for brain damage after injury to the brain is due to the neurons releasing their packets of neurotransmitters upon their death.  So you have a good neuron right next to a big blob of toxic neurotransmitters.  Then that neuron dies, too.  It's a chemical cascade of dying neurons.  Slowing down metabolism slows down this damage, as oxidation plays a large part.  Ever see those people that drown in icy water, only to be revived after hours without oxygen, somewhat intact?  Same thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the main mechanisms for brain damage after injury to the brain is due to the neurons releasing their packets of neurotransmitters upon their death .
So you have a good neuron right next to a big blob of toxic neurotransmitters .
Then that neuron dies , too .
It 's a chemical cascade of dying neurons .
Slowing down metabolism slows down this damage , as oxidation plays a large part .
Ever see those people that drown in icy water , only to be revived after hours without oxygen , somewhat intact ?
Same thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the main mechanisms for brain damage after injury to the brain is due to the neurons releasing their packets of neurotransmitters upon their death.
So you have a good neuron right next to a big blob of toxic neurotransmitters.
Then that neuron dies, too.
It's a chemical cascade of dying neurons.
Slowing down metabolism slows down this damage, as oxidation plays a large part.
Ever see those people that drown in icy water, only to be revived after hours without oxygen, somewhat intact?
Same thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361486</id>
	<title>Re:Long Duration Space Flight</title>
	<author>electrons\_are\_brave</author>
	<datestamp>1260205200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>plane flight?</htmltext>
<tokenext>plane flight ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>plane flight?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359398</id>
	<title>Re:Opposite of a Zombie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260189300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The terminology seems odd here.  Isn't suspended animation pretty much the opposite of being a zombie?  I mean zombies are the animated dead.  Suspended animation makes you the unanimated living.</p></div><p>Well see soon but I say if they come out of it squealing for pig's brains they're zombies.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The terminology seems odd here .
Is n't suspended animation pretty much the opposite of being a zombie ?
I mean zombies are the animated dead .
Suspended animation makes you the unanimated living.Well see soon but I say if they come out of it squealing for pig 's brains they 're zombies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The terminology seems odd here.
Isn't suspended animation pretty much the opposite of being a zombie?
I mean zombies are the animated dead.
Suspended animation makes you the unanimated living.Well see soon but I say if they come out of it squealing for pig's brains they're zombies.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30362848</id>
	<title>Re:Long Duration Space Flight</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260264480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure we'll see this technology reused.<br>For example in surgery, slowing metabolism would help in a few complex operations</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure we 'll see this technology reused.For example in surgery , slowing metabolism would help in a few complex operations</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure we'll see this technology reused.For example in surgery, slowing metabolism would help in a few complex operations</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359532</id>
	<title>Universal Soldier...</title>
	<author>Foobar of Borg</author>
	<datestamp>1260190140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm afraid they'll have to find a soldier who can kick unusually high before they can try this experiment.  And, if they get out of line, the CO will have to explain to them "You are confused."<br> <br>Jean-Claude van Damme: "I am confused."</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm afraid they 'll have to find a soldier who can kick unusually high before they can try this experiment .
And , if they get out of line , the CO will have to explain to them " You are confused .
" Jean-Claude van Damme : " I am confused .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm afraid they'll have to find a soldier who can kick unusually high before they can try this experiment.
And, if they get out of line, the CO will have to explain to them "You are confused.
" Jean-Claude van Damme: "I am confused.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30367362</id>
	<title>Re:Brain damage?</title>
	<author>CAIMLAS</author>
	<datestamp>1260297060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably not. If someone has a traumatic brain injury, they're likely in no sort of condition to pull out a syringe and inject it into themselves.</p><p>Also, while I've no evidence to back it up, I -suspect- that TBI was pretty common in previous wars. The difference today is that the soldiers are surviving all the other things with higher numbers, resulting in the TBI being a significantly higher proportion. Whereas they would've probably died from the other wounds accompanying TBI in the past, today they survive (see: double amputation, shrapnel, etc.).</p><p>I recall reading an article recently of someone in ORD (ordinance response and disposal, or something like that) - the guys who dress up in bear suits and go out to play with IEDs. The article was accompanied by a picture. He'd gotten blown up. His pants were singed and he had some shrapnel in his ass, but otherwise he was OK. Had that happened even 15 years ago he'd probably be dead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably not .
If someone has a traumatic brain injury , they 're likely in no sort of condition to pull out a syringe and inject it into themselves.Also , while I 've no evidence to back it up , I -suspect- that TBI was pretty common in previous wars .
The difference today is that the soldiers are surviving all the other things with higher numbers , resulting in the TBI being a significantly higher proportion .
Whereas they would 've probably died from the other wounds accompanying TBI in the past , today they survive ( see : double amputation , shrapnel , etc .
) .I recall reading an article recently of someone in ORD ( ordinance response and disposal , or something like that ) - the guys who dress up in bear suits and go out to play with IEDs .
The article was accompanied by a picture .
He 'd gotten blown up .
His pants were singed and he had some shrapnel in his ass , but otherwise he was OK. Had that happened even 15 years ago he 'd probably be dead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably not.
If someone has a traumatic brain injury, they're likely in no sort of condition to pull out a syringe and inject it into themselves.Also, while I've no evidence to back it up, I -suspect- that TBI was pretty common in previous wars.
The difference today is that the soldiers are surviving all the other things with higher numbers, resulting in the TBI being a significantly higher proportion.
Whereas they would've probably died from the other wounds accompanying TBI in the past, today they survive (see: double amputation, shrapnel, etc.
).I recall reading an article recently of someone in ORD (ordinance response and disposal, or something like that) - the guys who dress up in bear suits and go out to play with IEDs.
The article was accompanied by a picture.
He'd gotten blown up.
His pants were singed and he had some shrapnel in his ass, but otherwise he was OK. Had that happened even 15 years ago he'd probably be dead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359622</id>
	<title>Re:I disagree</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1260190680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ahhh, but Gum is the best weapon for killing zombie squirrels, double bubble looks like thinking meat and it builds up in their zombie tummies and blocks them up, squirrels and some other rodents can't throw up and so they will die a horrible zombie squirrel death.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahhh , but Gum is the best weapon for killing zombie squirrels , double bubble looks like thinking meat and it builds up in their zombie tummies and blocks them up , squirrels and some other rodents ca n't throw up and so they will die a horrible zombie squirrel death .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahhh, but Gum is the best weapon for killing zombie squirrels, double bubble looks like thinking meat and it builds up in their zombie tummies and blocks them up, squirrels and some other rodents can't throw up and so they will die a horrible zombie squirrel death.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140</id>
	<title>Brain damage?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260187980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the biggies in this war is Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) - surviving explosions, surviving shots to the helmet - I wonder if we'll be swapping out a lot of dead soldiers for ones suffering extreme brain injury.</p><p>A friend of mine just came back from Germany. He lost both of his legs and has TBI caused mood swings like you wouldn't believe, and pretty much looks like it will wreck his family. Staving off death is one thing (and good); making life after injury worth living is another.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the biggies in this war is Traumatic Brain Injury ( TBI ) - surviving explosions , surviving shots to the helmet - I wonder if we 'll be swapping out a lot of dead soldiers for ones suffering extreme brain injury.A friend of mine just came back from Germany .
He lost both of his legs and has TBI caused mood swings like you would n't believe , and pretty much looks like it will wreck his family .
Staving off death is one thing ( and good ) ; making life after injury worth living is another .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the biggies in this war is Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) - surviving explosions, surviving shots to the helmet - I wonder if we'll be swapping out a lot of dead soldiers for ones suffering extreme brain injury.A friend of mine just came back from Germany.
He lost both of his legs and has TBI caused mood swings like you wouldn't believe, and pretty much looks like it will wreck his family.
Staving off death is one thing (and good); making life after injury worth living is another.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359546</id>
	<title>Vampires next?</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1260190260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's the next advancement... do we find a battlefield-tested way to drain their blood and freeze-dry them for convenient transport?  First zombies, and then vampires?  I'm growing more garlic and saplings, just in case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the next advancement... do we find a battlefield-tested way to drain their blood and freeze-dry them for convenient transport ?
First zombies , and then vampires ?
I 'm growing more garlic and saplings , just in case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the next advancement... do we find a battlefield-tested way to drain their blood and freeze-dry them for convenient transport?
First zombies, and then vampires?
I'm growing more garlic and saplings, just in case.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363136</id>
	<title>Re:Brain damage?</title>
	<author>XDirtypunkX</author>
	<datestamp>1260268380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Putting ideological misgivings about Keynesian economics and government control aside; it's nothing like a Ponzi scheme, just like all interest bearing loans that are invested wisely aren't Ponzi schemes.</p><p>In a properly designed fiscal stimulus, there is an aggregate return on the investment (value is created) in the form of increased aggregate demand (greater growth now) as well as long term infrastructure and R&amp;D that will provide future growth and benefit (i.e tangibles that provide value over time). In a Ponzi scheme there can't be an aggregate return on investment, because there is nothing of value produced and the net amount of value is the same.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Putting ideological misgivings about Keynesian economics and government control aside ; it 's nothing like a Ponzi scheme , just like all interest bearing loans that are invested wisely are n't Ponzi schemes.In a properly designed fiscal stimulus , there is an aggregate return on the investment ( value is created ) in the form of increased aggregate demand ( greater growth now ) as well as long term infrastructure and R&amp;D that will provide future growth and benefit ( i.e tangibles that provide value over time ) .
In a Ponzi scheme there ca n't be an aggregate return on investment , because there is nothing of value produced and the net amount of value is the same .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Putting ideological misgivings about Keynesian economics and government control aside; it's nothing like a Ponzi scheme, just like all interest bearing loans that are invested wisely aren't Ponzi schemes.In a properly designed fiscal stimulus, there is an aggregate return on the investment (value is created) in the form of increased aggregate demand (greater growth now) as well as long term infrastructure and R&amp;D that will provide future growth and benefit (i.e tangibles that provide value over time).
In a Ponzi scheme there can't be an aggregate return on investment, because there is nothing of value produced and the net amount of value is the same.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359962</id>
	<title>Re:Oxidative damage.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260193200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Extending the golden hour to ten seem pretty good for soldiers, but
I wonder if this would help the cryo-preservation of corpses to be
brought back to life later, like in woody aliens sleeper.
<p>
---
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/Cryonics/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com">Cryonics Feed</a> [feeddistiller.com] @ <a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/" title="feeddistiller.com">Feed Distiller</a> [feeddistiller.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Extending the golden hour to ten seem pretty good for soldiers , but I wonder if this would help the cryo-preservation of corpses to be brought back to life later , like in woody aliens sleeper .
--- Cryonics Feed [ feeddistiller.com ] @ Feed Distiller [ feeddistiller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Extending the golden hour to ten seem pretty good for soldiers, but
I wonder if this would help the cryo-preservation of corpses to be
brought back to life later, like in woody aliens sleeper.
---

Cryonics Feed [feeddistiller.com] @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359462</id>
	<title>New compound</title>
	<author>Conditioner</author>
	<datestamp>1260189660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Excellent, and we will call this new compound "The T-Virus"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Excellent , and we will call this new compound " The T-Virus "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Excellent, and we will call this new compound "The T-Virus"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359612</id>
	<title>Re:Opposite of a Zombie</title>
	<author>Labcoat Samurai</author>
	<datestamp>1260190620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Use body heat from meatbags as a power source in case we accidentally block out the sun with pollution?</p><p>Wait, no, that's stupid.  My mistake</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Use body heat from meatbags as a power source in case we accidentally block out the sun with pollution ? Wait , no , that 's stupid .
My mistake</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use body heat from meatbags as a power source in case we accidentally block out the sun with pollution?Wait, no, that's stupid.
My mistake</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30366120</id>
	<title>Re:Damage Mechanism</title>
	<author>MattSausage</author>
	<datestamp>1260291600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Discover Magazine had an article about hypothermia treatment for various injuries, and cited a news story from Japan where a guy got lost in the mountains and fell and hit his head and was out, buried in the snow with head trauma for DAYS unconscious, until he was found. He was warmed up, treated, and released with no ill effects.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Discover Magazine had an article about hypothermia treatment for various injuries , and cited a news story from Japan where a guy got lost in the mountains and fell and hit his head and was out , buried in the snow with head trauma for DAYS unconscious , until he was found .
He was warmed up , treated , and released with no ill effects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Discover Magazine had an article about hypothermia treatment for various injuries, and cited a news story from Japan where a guy got lost in the mountains and fell and hit his head and was out, buried in the snow with head trauma for DAYS unconscious, until he was found.
He was warmed up, treated, and released with no ill effects.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359766</id>
	<title>Doctorow</title>
	<author>kasper\_souren</author>
	<datestamp>1260191700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Damn. I just finished rereading Doctorow's after the siege: <a href="http://www.infinitematrix.net/stories/shorts/after-the-siege.html" title="infinitematrix.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.infinitematrix.net/stories/shorts/after-the-siege.html</a> [infinitematrix.net]

"That much she knew and that much they all knew: without the zombies, the revolution would never have come. Zombiism and the need to cure it had outweighed every other priority. Three governments had promised that they'd negotiate better prices for zombiism drugs and three governments had failed, and in the end the Cabinet had been overrun by zombies who'd torn three MPs to bits and infected seven more, and the crowd had carried the PM out of her office and put her in a barrel and driven nails through it and rolled it down the river-bank into the river, something so horrible and delicious that Valentine often thought about it, like you poke a sore tooth with your tongue."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn .
I just finished rereading Doctorow 's after the siege : http : //www.infinitematrix.net/stories/shorts/after-the-siege.html [ infinitematrix.net ] " That much she knew and that much they all knew : without the zombies , the revolution would never have come .
Zombiism and the need to cure it had outweighed every other priority .
Three governments had promised that they 'd negotiate better prices for zombiism drugs and three governments had failed , and in the end the Cabinet had been overrun by zombies who 'd torn three MPs to bits and infected seven more , and the crowd had carried the PM out of her office and put her in a barrel and driven nails through it and rolled it down the river-bank into the river , something so horrible and delicious that Valentine often thought about it , like you poke a sore tooth with your tongue .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn.
I just finished rereading Doctorow's after the siege: http://www.infinitematrix.net/stories/shorts/after-the-siege.html [infinitematrix.net]

"That much she knew and that much they all knew: without the zombies, the revolution would never have come.
Zombiism and the need to cure it had outweighed every other priority.
Three governments had promised that they'd negotiate better prices for zombiism drugs and three governments had failed, and in the end the Cabinet had been overrun by zombies who'd torn three MPs to bits and infected seven more, and the crowd had carried the PM out of her office and put her in a barrel and driven nails through it and rolled it down the river-bank into the river, something so horrible and delicious that Valentine often thought about it, like you poke a sore tooth with your tongue.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363240</id>
	<title>Re:The Future Of Medicine</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1260270120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Really, this is how I see medicine in the future."</p><p>Yes, unfortunately it's also what I see as the cause of the 22nd century's major problem just as ours is climate change. Their problem will be massive overpopulation, how do you deal with a population that doesn't die but keeps increasing when the resources of the planet they live on can't sustain their population even right now, let alone then?</p><p>The only options are to either let people die, stop new people being born, or move to other planets. I'm not convinced in a hundred years we'll have the technology to get to other inhabitable planets and, well, inhabit them. If this is indeed the case it'll be a decision between preventing new births or enforcing maximum life spans to achieve the former options.</p><p>The ability to keep people alive indefinitely and recover people from even the most horrific incidents may well be the next atomic bomb- a technology that we may find that we would often perhaps like to be able to undiscover.</p><p>Does anyone else have any ideas how we might go about solving the population problem should we obtain the ability to keep people alive much longer and fight back death? A solution that can realistically be achieved in at most, the next 91 years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Really , this is how I see medicine in the future .
" Yes , unfortunately it 's also what I see as the cause of the 22nd century 's major problem just as ours is climate change .
Their problem will be massive overpopulation , how do you deal with a population that does n't die but keeps increasing when the resources of the planet they live on ca n't sustain their population even right now , let alone then ? The only options are to either let people die , stop new people being born , or move to other planets .
I 'm not convinced in a hundred years we 'll have the technology to get to other inhabitable planets and , well , inhabit them .
If this is indeed the case it 'll be a decision between preventing new births or enforcing maximum life spans to achieve the former options.The ability to keep people alive indefinitely and recover people from even the most horrific incidents may well be the next atomic bomb- a technology that we may find that we would often perhaps like to be able to undiscover.Does anyone else have any ideas how we might go about solving the population problem should we obtain the ability to keep people alive much longer and fight back death ?
A solution that can realistically be achieved in at most , the next 91 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Really, this is how I see medicine in the future.
"Yes, unfortunately it's also what I see as the cause of the 22nd century's major problem just as ours is climate change.
Their problem will be massive overpopulation, how do you deal with a population that doesn't die but keeps increasing when the resources of the planet they live on can't sustain their population even right now, let alone then?The only options are to either let people die, stop new people being born, or move to other planets.
I'm not convinced in a hundred years we'll have the technology to get to other inhabitable planets and, well, inhabit them.
If this is indeed the case it'll be a decision between preventing new births or enforcing maximum life spans to achieve the former options.The ability to keep people alive indefinitely and recover people from even the most horrific incidents may well be the next atomic bomb- a technology that we may find that we would often perhaps like to be able to undiscover.Does anyone else have any ideas how we might go about solving the population problem should we obtain the ability to keep people alive much longer and fight back death?
A solution that can realistically be achieved in at most, the next 91 years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242</id>
	<title>Opposite of a Zombie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260188400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The terminology seems odd here.  Isn't suspended animation pretty much the opposite of being a zombie?  I mean zombies are the animated dead.  Suspended animation makes you the unanimated living.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The terminology seems odd here .
Is n't suspended animation pretty much the opposite of being a zombie ?
I mean zombies are the animated dead .
Suspended animation makes you the unanimated living .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The terminology seems odd here.
Isn't suspended animation pretty much the opposite of being a zombie?
I mean zombies are the animated dead.
Suspended animation makes you the unanimated living.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360562</id>
	<title>Idiocracy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260197820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This sound more like the human hibernation project. Store your bests for when they are need the most.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This sound more like the human hibernation project .
Store your bests for when they are need the most .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sound more like the human hibernation project.
Store your bests for when they are need the most.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359788</id>
	<title>Re:Brain damage?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260191880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pfff..hahahahahahaa.... Since when are soldiers known for their *brains*? I mean they are soldiers *specifically* because they have no own opinions in the first place.</p><p>A soldier is basically a machine that&rsquo;s controlled.</p><p>Brains in soldiers... lol. Next you tell me about Fox News watchers who know propositional calculus. ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pfff..hahahahahahaa.... Since when are soldiers known for their * brains * ?
I mean they are soldiers * specifically * because they have no own opinions in the first place.A soldier is basically a machine that    s controlled.Brains in soldiers... lol. Next you tell me about Fox News watchers who know propositional calculus .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pfff..hahahahahahaa.... Since when are soldiers known for their *brains*?
I mean they are soldiers *specifically* because they have no own opinions in the first place.A soldier is basically a machine that’s controlled.Brains in soldiers... lol. Next you tell me about Fox News watchers who know propositional calculus.
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361182</id>
	<title>Re:Opposite of a Zombie</title>
	<author>azav</author>
	<datestamp>1260202860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Animated dead?  You mean like Jesus?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Animated dead ?
You mean like Jesus ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Animated dead?
You mean like Jesus?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359592</id>
	<title>Re:Brain damage...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260190500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, that war over in Germany is still going on? I thought it was over like 50 years ago...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , that war over in Germany is still going on ?
I thought it was over like 50 years ago.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, that war over in Germany is still going on?
I thought it was over like 50 years ago...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30366480</id>
	<title>Re:Don't do it</title>
	<author>ElizabethGreene</author>
	<datestamp>1260292860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As a Cryonicist <a href="http://cryonics.org/" title="cryonics.org">http://cryonics.org/</a> [cryonics.org], I support this research.  It is nice to see money being spent on something that doesn't go boom.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a Cryonicist http : //cryonics.org/ [ cryonics.org ] , I support this research .
It is nice to see money being spent on something that does n't go boom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a Cryonicist http://cryonics.org/ [cryonics.org], I support this research.
It is nice to see money being spent on something that doesn't go boom.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359958</id>
	<title>Re:I disagree</title>
	<author>Shadow Wrought</author>
	<datestamp>1260193140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bummer the Zombiacolypse is slated to occur when you and your buddies are in Vegas for that bachelor party...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bummer the Zombiacolypse is slated to occur when you and your buddies are in Vegas for that bachelor party.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bummer the Zombiacolypse is slated to occur when you and your buddies are in Vegas for that bachelor party...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361018</id>
	<title>!Zombie</title>
	<author>njfuzzy</author>
	<datestamp>1260201300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A zombie is a dead thing that moves. This article describes a living thing that doesn't move. How far off can it get?</htmltext>
<tokenext>A zombie is a dead thing that moves .
This article describes a living thing that does n't move .
How far off can it get ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A zombie is a dead thing that moves.
This article describes a living thing that doesn't move.
How far off can it get?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361264</id>
	<title>Re:Damage Mechanism</title>
	<author>DynaSoar</author>
	<datestamp>1260203580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One of the main mechanisms for brain damage after injury to the brain is due to the neurons releasing their packets of neurotransmitters upon their death.  So you have a good neuron right next to a big blob of toxic neurotransmitters.  Then that neuron dies, too.  It's a chemical cascade of dying neurons.  Slowing down metabolism slows down this damage, as oxidation plays a large part.  Ever see those people that drown in icy water, only to be revived after hours without oxygen, somewhat intact?  Same thing.</p></div><p>You're referring to apoptosis, "cellular suicide" caused by a signal from a nearby neuron dying. Parkinson's is one disorder that wouldn't occur except for this phenomenon.</p><p>But forced release of vesicles, toxic neurotransmitters and hypothermic preservation (or lack of, or lack of equivalent)? I can tell you remember learning about it, and probably know what you mean, but you've got some details bent. The toxicities involved in apoptosis aren't metabolic processes, but they are slowed by cooling. Cooling can be done to reduce oxidative stress due to hyperoxia (too much oxygen) as well as ischemic insult from hypoxia (too little). We're just more aware of the latter due to the many reported cases of recovery from near drowning due to rapid cooling.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the main mechanisms for brain damage after injury to the brain is due to the neurons releasing their packets of neurotransmitters upon their death .
So you have a good neuron right next to a big blob of toxic neurotransmitters .
Then that neuron dies , too .
It 's a chemical cascade of dying neurons .
Slowing down metabolism slows down this damage , as oxidation plays a large part .
Ever see those people that drown in icy water , only to be revived after hours without oxygen , somewhat intact ?
Same thing.You 're referring to apoptosis , " cellular suicide " caused by a signal from a nearby neuron dying .
Parkinson 's is one disorder that would n't occur except for this phenomenon.But forced release of vesicles , toxic neurotransmitters and hypothermic preservation ( or lack of , or lack of equivalent ) ?
I can tell you remember learning about it , and probably know what you mean , but you 've got some details bent .
The toxicities involved in apoptosis are n't metabolic processes , but they are slowed by cooling .
Cooling can be done to reduce oxidative stress due to hyperoxia ( too much oxygen ) as well as ischemic insult from hypoxia ( too little ) .
We 're just more aware of the latter due to the many reported cases of recovery from near drowning due to rapid cooling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the main mechanisms for brain damage after injury to the brain is due to the neurons releasing their packets of neurotransmitters upon their death.
So you have a good neuron right next to a big blob of toxic neurotransmitters.
Then that neuron dies, too.
It's a chemical cascade of dying neurons.
Slowing down metabolism slows down this damage, as oxidation plays a large part.
Ever see those people that drown in icy water, only to be revived after hours without oxygen, somewhat intact?
Same thing.You're referring to apoptosis, "cellular suicide" caused by a signal from a nearby neuron dying.
Parkinson's is one disorder that wouldn't occur except for this phenomenon.But forced release of vesicles, toxic neurotransmitters and hypothermic preservation (or lack of, or lack of equivalent)?
I can tell you remember learning about it, and probably know what you mean, but you've got some details bent.
The toxicities involved in apoptosis aren't metabolic processes, but they are slowed by cooling.
Cooling can be done to reduce oxidative stress due to hyperoxia (too much oxygen) as well as ischemic insult from hypoxia (too little).
We're just more aware of the latter due to the many reported cases of recovery from near drowning due to rapid cooling.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30371710</id>
	<title>Re:Brain damage?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260273600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&ldquo;-1, Troll&rdquo;. But still true.</p><p>You can mod it all the way to repression. Won&rsquo;t change a thing.</p><p>If you modded me down, it&rsquo;s obvious, that YOU&rsquo;re one of them, and of course can&rsquo;t stand the truth being called out.</p><p>Go watch some Fox News, or sit on a sharp stone, or something, would ya? ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>   -1 , Troll    .
But still true.You can mod it all the way to repression .
Won    t change a thing.If you modded me down , it    s obvious , that YOU    re one of them , and of course can    t stand the truth being called out.Go watch some Fox News , or sit on a sharp stone , or something , would ya ?
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>“-1, Troll”.
But still true.You can mod it all the way to repression.
Won’t change a thing.If you modded me down, it’s obvious, that YOU’re one of them, and of course can’t stand the truth being called out.Go watch some Fox News, or sit on a sharp stone, or something, would ya?
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30367324</id>
	<title>Re:The Future Of Medicine</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1260296880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, if it really does become a problem, perhaps we could develop the technology to upload the human consciousness into circuitry, making it so that each 'person' uses many fewer resources and exists in a virtual(ish) world. Not sure if that's the best solution, but I always figured that eventually we are going to find that these meatbags we occupy have a limited shelf life. Perhaps we can push that life up a little longer...115 years or 130 years rather than 100, but sooner or later the parts just wear out (like the engines of even the most reliable cars and motorcycles). Thus, to continue extending human life, the default answer seems to be to keep the mental abstraction known as identity (whatever the hell that is), digitize it, and download it into more reliable, easily recycled hardware (circuitry). Of course, it is debatable whether we will be able to inhabit other planets or inhabit our computers first, but its still another idea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if it really does become a problem , perhaps we could develop the technology to upload the human consciousness into circuitry , making it so that each 'person ' uses many fewer resources and exists in a virtual ( ish ) world .
Not sure if that 's the best solution , but I always figured that eventually we are going to find that these meatbags we occupy have a limited shelf life .
Perhaps we can push that life up a little longer...115 years or 130 years rather than 100 , but sooner or later the parts just wear out ( like the engines of even the most reliable cars and motorcycles ) .
Thus , to continue extending human life , the default answer seems to be to keep the mental abstraction known as identity ( whatever the hell that is ) , digitize it , and download it into more reliable , easily recycled hardware ( circuitry ) .
Of course , it is debatable whether we will be able to inhabit other planets or inhabit our computers first , but its still another idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if it really does become a problem, perhaps we could develop the technology to upload the human consciousness into circuitry, making it so that each 'person' uses many fewer resources and exists in a virtual(ish) world.
Not sure if that's the best solution, but I always figured that eventually we are going to find that these meatbags we occupy have a limited shelf life.
Perhaps we can push that life up a little longer...115 years or 130 years rather than 100, but sooner or later the parts just wear out (like the engines of even the most reliable cars and motorcycles).
Thus, to continue extending human life, the default answer seems to be to keep the mental abstraction known as identity (whatever the hell that is), digitize it, and download it into more reliable, easily recycled hardware (circuitry).
Of course, it is debatable whether we will be able to inhabit other planets or inhabit our computers first, but its still another idea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058</id>
	<title>Don't do it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260187680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't they watch movies?  Haven't we learned anything?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't they watch movies ?
Have n't we learned anything ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't they watch movies?
Haven't we learned anything?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363112</id>
	<title>Re:Long Duration Space Flight</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260268080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Forget space-flight, I'd be happy to use this to stave off the tedium of a trans-Atlantic flight. If they can freeze me at my house and stuff me in the taxi, then I wouldn't have to bother with the queues at check-in and security, either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget space-flight , I 'd be happy to use this to stave off the tedium of a trans-Atlantic flight .
If they can freeze me at my house and stuff me in the taxi , then I would n't have to bother with the queues at check-in and security , either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget space-flight, I'd be happy to use this to stave off the tedium of a trans-Atlantic flight.
If they can freeze me at my house and stuff me in the taxi, then I wouldn't have to bother with the queues at check-in and security, either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359160</id>
	<title>Oxidative damage.</title>
	<author>spineboy</author>
	<datestamp>1260188100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most of these types of experiments have previously been in cryo-preservation - some scientist, in Boston I believe, has successfully frozen beagles, and brought them back to life.</p><p>Anyway, In trauma surgery, the "Golden Hour" refers to the window of time, where massively injured patients can be saved from horrible injuries.  After that, too much damage occurs, and the chance is severely diminished.</p><p>So using H2S(hydrogen sulphide) should help stop oxidative reactions, extending the "Golden Hour", allowing the patient to be stabilized, and brought to a higher level of care, where they can be fixed up.</p><p>Small side effect - H2S is basically the stench in Marsh gas, so these soldiers are going to smell like stink ass zombies for a while I think.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of these types of experiments have previously been in cryo-preservation - some scientist , in Boston I believe , has successfully frozen beagles , and brought them back to life.Anyway , In trauma surgery , the " Golden Hour " refers to the window of time , where massively injured patients can be saved from horrible injuries .
After that , too much damage occurs , and the chance is severely diminished.So using H2S ( hydrogen sulphide ) should help stop oxidative reactions , extending the " Golden Hour " , allowing the patient to be stabilized , and brought to a higher level of care , where they can be fixed up.Small side effect - H2S is basically the stench in Marsh gas , so these soldiers are going to smell like stink ass zombies for a while I think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of these types of experiments have previously been in cryo-preservation - some scientist, in Boston I believe, has successfully frozen beagles, and brought them back to life.Anyway, In trauma surgery, the "Golden Hour" refers to the window of time, where massively injured patients can be saved from horrible injuries.
After that, too much damage occurs, and the chance is severely diminished.So using H2S(hydrogen sulphide) should help stop oxidative reactions, extending the "Golden Hour", allowing the patient to be stabilized, and brought to a higher level of care, where they can be fixed up.Small side effect - H2S is basically the stench in Marsh gas, so these soldiers are going to smell like stink ass zombies for a while I think.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30365496</id>
	<title>MEDIC!</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1260288960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great so it will just be like Enemy Territory then? Medics running around poking people with syringes... Word to the wise medics, if ET has taught me anything, it's shoot the Medics first, so don't be so proud of this technological terror you have created. I find you lack of faith disturbing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great so it will just be like Enemy Territory then ?
Medics running around poking people with syringes... Word to the wise medics , if ET has taught me anything , it 's shoot the Medics first , so do n't be so proud of this technological terror you have created .
I find you lack of faith disturbing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great so it will just be like Enemy Territory then?
Medics running around poking people with syringes... Word to the wise medics, if ET has taught me anything, it's shoot the Medics first, so don't be so proud of this technological terror you have created.
I find you lack of faith disturbing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363360</id>
	<title>Re:Brain damage?</title>
	<author>Genda</author>
	<datestamp>1260272460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Waiting for it... waiting for it... Aaaaahhhhhhh, thank you, it just wouldn't have been a respectable zombie article without some bbrraaaaiinnnnzzzz.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Waiting for it... waiting for it... Aaaaahhhhhhh , thank you , it just would n't have been a respectable zombie article without some bbrraaaaiinnnnzzzz .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Waiting for it... waiting for it... Aaaaahhhhhhh, thank you, it just wouldn't have been a respectable zombie article without some bbrraaaaiinnnnzzzz.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359764</id>
	<title>well i knew it....</title>
	<author>jisou</author>
	<datestamp>1260191700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>darpa is defiantly going to be the government organization to incite the zombie apocalypse. though i shouldn't say that to loud considering the made the internet.....</htmltext>
<tokenext>darpa is defiantly going to be the government organization to incite the zombie apocalypse .
though i should n't say that to loud considering the made the internet.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>darpa is defiantly going to be the government organization to incite the zombie apocalypse.
though i shouldn't say that to loud considering the made the internet.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359474</id>
	<title>Re:Opposite of a Zombie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260189780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, it depends if it works as intended.<br> <br>What if, upon revival, the survivors weren't "all there"?  If the process works incompletely then we'd have the zombies we're looking for.<br> <br>So the process is:<br> <br>1. Put injured people in suspended animation<br>2. Extract soul (or whatever makes us non-zombies) <br>3. Reanimate the meatbags<br>4. ???<br>5. Profit!<br> <br>Sorry to re-use an old meme, but it applies.  Some ideas for step 4:<br> <br>-Sell souls to Satan<br>-put meatbags to work in factories where manual dexterity is not needed<br>-use army of meatbags to take over small island resort nations<br>-use meatbags as shock troops<br>-train meatbags to vote for the political party of your choice (more effective than mass marketing campaigns)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it depends if it works as intended .
What if , upon revival , the survivors were n't " all there " ?
If the process works incompletely then we 'd have the zombies we 're looking for .
So the process is : 1 .
Put injured people in suspended animation2 .
Extract soul ( or whatever makes us non-zombies ) 3 .
Reanimate the meatbags4 .
? ? ? 5. Profit !
Sorry to re-use an old meme , but it applies .
Some ideas for step 4 : -Sell souls to Satan-put meatbags to work in factories where manual dexterity is not needed-use army of meatbags to take over small island resort nations-use meatbags as shock troops-train meatbags to vote for the political party of your choice ( more effective than mass marketing campaigns )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it depends if it works as intended.
What if, upon revival, the survivors weren't "all there"?
If the process works incompletely then we'd have the zombies we're looking for.
So the process is: 1.
Put injured people in suspended animation2.
Extract soul (or whatever makes us non-zombies) 3.
Reanimate the meatbags4.
???5. Profit!
Sorry to re-use an old meme, but it applies.
Some ideas for step 4: -Sell souls to Satan-put meatbags to work in factories where manual dexterity is not needed-use army of meatbags to take over small island resort nations-use meatbags as shock troops-train meatbags to vote for the political party of your choice (more effective than mass marketing campaigns)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359704</id>
	<title>The Future Of Medicine</title>
	<author>Citizen of Earth</author>
	<datestamp>1260191340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really, this is how I see medicine in the future.  If you suffer serious trauma, the paramedics will simply kill you at the scene and take your corpse to a hospital where the doctors will patch you up and resurrect you several hours later.  If your hand gets mangled, they will simply hack it off, slather on some stem cells, and you'll over a few months, you'll just grow a new one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really , this is how I see medicine in the future .
If you suffer serious trauma , the paramedics will simply kill you at the scene and take your corpse to a hospital where the doctors will patch you up and resurrect you several hours later .
If your hand gets mangled , they will simply hack it off , slather on some stem cells , and you 'll over a few months , you 'll just grow a new one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really, this is how I see medicine in the future.
If you suffer serious trauma, the paramedics will simply kill you at the scene and take your corpse to a hospital where the doctors will patch you up and resurrect you several hours later.
If your hand gets mangled, they will simply hack it off, slather on some stem cells, and you'll over a few months, you'll just grow a new one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30364068</id>
	<title>Re:Brain damage?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260281700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One of the biggies in this war is Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) - surviving explosions, surviving shots to the helmet - I wonder if we'll be swapping out a lot of dead soldiers for ones suffering extreme brain injury.</p><p>A friend of mine just came back from Germany. He lost both of his legs and has TBI caused mood swings like you wouldn't believe, and pretty much looks like it will wreck his family. Staving off death is one thing (and good); making life after injury worth living is another.</p></div><p>Life is always better than death.</p><p>Cpl. Joseph Iraq</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the biggies in this war is Traumatic Brain Injury ( TBI ) - surviving explosions , surviving shots to the helmet - I wonder if we 'll be swapping out a lot of dead soldiers for ones suffering extreme brain injury.A friend of mine just came back from Germany .
He lost both of his legs and has TBI caused mood swings like you would n't believe , and pretty much looks like it will wreck his family .
Staving off death is one thing ( and good ) ; making life after injury worth living is another.Life is always better than death.Cpl .
Joseph Iraq</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the biggies in this war is Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) - surviving explosions, surviving shots to the helmet - I wonder if we'll be swapping out a lot of dead soldiers for ones suffering extreme brain injury.A friend of mine just came back from Germany.
He lost both of his legs and has TBI caused mood swings like you wouldn't believe, and pretty much looks like it will wreck his family.
Staving off death is one thing (and good); making life after injury worth living is another.Life is always better than death.Cpl.
Joseph Iraq
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361492</id>
	<title>Re:I disagree</title>
	<author>osu-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1260205260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>All being military or former military... we all voted the human race as generally despicable and that it was about time there was some event to clean the slate.</p></div><p>Does it disturb anyone to know that the people whose job is to protect us are of the opinion that we ought to be killed off?  o.O  Not saying they won't do their jobs, it's just... interesting.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All being military or former military... we all voted the human race as generally despicable and that it was about time there was some event to clean the slate.Does it disturb anyone to know that the people whose job is to protect us are of the opinion that we ought to be killed off ?
o.O Not saying they wo n't do their jobs , it 's just... interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All being military or former military... we all voted the human race as generally despicable and that it was about time there was some event to clean the slate.Does it disturb anyone to know that the people whose job is to protect us are of the opinion that we ought to be killed off?
o.O  Not saying they won't do their jobs, it's just... interesting.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361582</id>
	<title>Re:Brain damage?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260205920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I got a better idea: let's stop getting in to offensive wars and only engage in defensive actions. It would work wonders for our military mortality and brain damage rates.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got a better idea : let 's stop getting in to offensive wars and only engage in defensive actions .
It would work wonders for our military mortality and brain damage rates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got a better idea: let's stop getting in to offensive wars and only engage in defensive actions.
It would work wonders for our military mortality and brain damage rates.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360298</id>
	<title>What about the other alternative</title>
	<author>voss</author>
	<datestamp>1260195960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the year 2010 , the military performed the last of their life support experiments on Captain William "Buck" Rogers.<br>In a freak mishap he was lost...only to be found 500 years later.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the year 2010 , the military performed the last of their life support experiments on Captain William " Buck " Rogers.In a freak mishap he was lost...only to be found 500 years later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the year 2010 , the military performed the last of their life support experiments on Captain William "Buck" Rogers.In a freak mishap he was lost...only to be found 500 years later.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363304</id>
	<title>Re:Long Duration Space Flight</title>
	<author>mrsquid0</author>
	<datestamp>1260271560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would like to see this technique tweaked and used as a method of hibernation to stave off boredome and conserve supplies when there is nothing good on tv.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would like to see this technique tweaked and used as a method of hibernation to stave off boredome and conserve supplies when there is nothing good on tv .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would like to see this technique tweaked and used as a method of hibernation to stave off boredome and conserve supplies when there is nothing good on tv.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361536</id>
	<title>Re:Opposite of a Zombie</title>
	<author>DynaSoar</author>
	<datestamp>1260205620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The terminology seems odd here.  Isn't suspended animation pretty much the opposite of being a zombie?  I mean zombies are the animated dead.  Suspended animation makes you the unanimated living.</p></div><p>Oh horrors! You mean the International Journal Of The Society Of Wiredness For Scientificular Correctiviscousity And Technillogical Perfectitooty got it less than absolutely right? I can't imagine their crack research team making that kind of mistake. Must be a typo.</p><p>DARPA is actually funding both paths of research. Rapid metabolic reduction is being looked at for blood loss, and a dissociative/hypnotic without loss of motor control is being considered for far forward troops that, having been injured, may have to walk out; this would keep them docile and less likely to damage themselves further by struggling, as well as reduce the effect of cognitive traumatic shock and its contribution to peripheral hypovolemic shock when the body attempts to preserve itself by keeping as much blood as possible in the core. The thinking here is that if Sgt Rock can be made too stupid to connect that bloody stump to his sudden inability to scratch his nose, but stable enough to be self-mobilizing, they may not have to send a chopper in harms way to extract this troop.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The terminology seems odd here .
Is n't suspended animation pretty much the opposite of being a zombie ?
I mean zombies are the animated dead .
Suspended animation makes you the unanimated living.Oh horrors !
You mean the International Journal Of The Society Of Wiredness For Scientificular Correctiviscousity And Technillogical Perfectitooty got it less than absolutely right ?
I ca n't imagine their crack research team making that kind of mistake .
Must be a typo.DARPA is actually funding both paths of research .
Rapid metabolic reduction is being looked at for blood loss , and a dissociative/hypnotic without loss of motor control is being considered for far forward troops that , having been injured , may have to walk out ; this would keep them docile and less likely to damage themselves further by struggling , as well as reduce the effect of cognitive traumatic shock and its contribution to peripheral hypovolemic shock when the body attempts to preserve itself by keeping as much blood as possible in the core .
The thinking here is that if Sgt Rock can be made too stupid to connect that bloody stump to his sudden inability to scratch his nose , but stable enough to be self-mobilizing , they may not have to send a chopper in harms way to extract this troop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The terminology seems odd here.
Isn't suspended animation pretty much the opposite of being a zombie?
I mean zombies are the animated dead.
Suspended animation makes you the unanimated living.Oh horrors!
You mean the International Journal Of The Society Of Wiredness For Scientificular Correctiviscousity And Technillogical Perfectitooty got it less than absolutely right?
I can't imagine their crack research team making that kind of mistake.
Must be a typo.DARPA is actually funding both paths of research.
Rapid metabolic reduction is being looked at for blood loss, and a dissociative/hypnotic without loss of motor control is being considered for far forward troops that, having been injured, may have to walk out; this would keep them docile and less likely to damage themselves further by struggling, as well as reduce the effect of cognitive traumatic shock and its contribution to peripheral hypovolemic shock when the body attempts to preserve itself by keeping as much blood as possible in the core.
The thinking here is that if Sgt Rock can be made too stupid to connect that bloody stump to his sudden inability to scratch his nose, but stable enough to be self-mobilizing, they may not have to send a chopper in harms way to extract this troop.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361262</id>
	<title>Re:Long Duration Space Flight</title>
	<author>vaporland</author>
	<datestamp>1260203580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>that will only work as long as the HAL 9000 doesn't get pissed off and unplug everyone...</htmltext>
<tokenext>that will only work as long as the HAL 9000 does n't get pissed off and unplug everyone.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that will only work as long as the HAL 9000 doesn't get pissed off and unplug everyone...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360130</id>
	<title>Re:Use it on the enemy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260194400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is effectively what the Israleites did. Men of this village wanted to marry the Jewish women. The Jewish men, said OK, but to that you must be circumcised. The village men lined up and had it done, retired to their beds to sleep it off, and were killed by the Jewish men. I forget the name of the story, but it's in the Old Testament.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is effectively what the Israleites did .
Men of this village wanted to marry the Jewish women .
The Jewish men , said OK , but to that you must be circumcised .
The village men lined up and had it done , retired to their beds to sleep it off , and were killed by the Jewish men .
I forget the name of the story , but it 's in the Old Testament .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is effectively what the Israleites did.
Men of this village wanted to marry the Jewish women.
The Jewish men, said OK, but to that you must be circumcised.
The village men lined up and had it done, retired to their beds to sleep it off, and were killed by the Jewish men.
I forget the name of the story, but it's in the Old Testament.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30362252</id>
	<title>Re:Brain damage?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260213180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sadly there's no '-1 Tasteless'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly there 's no '-1 Tasteless' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly there's no '-1 Tasteless'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360434</id>
	<title>Re:Don't do it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260196980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The key is to not let them overheat. Keep them cool and ice them down every so often, or they will burn up.....oh....wait....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The key is to not let them overheat .
Keep them cool and ice them down every so often , or they will burn up.....oh....wait... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The key is to not let them overheat.
Keep them cool and ice them down every so often, or they will burn up.....oh....wait....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360766</id>
	<title>Re:Oxidative damage.</title>
	<author>Thing 1</author>
	<datestamp>1260199260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>[...] some scientist, in Boston I believe, has successfully frozen beagles, and brought them back to life.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>So I was going to reply with a joke, "The Jews have been doing that for years, sometimes with lox!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... oh you mean b<b>e</b>agles."</p><p>Then I saw that another responder has already mentioned Nazis, and I feared the wrath of Godwin.</p><p>Then, I decided, I've never met the guy; might as well summon him.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ ... ] some scientist , in Boston I believe , has successfully frozen beagles , and brought them back to life .
So I was going to reply with a joke , " The Jews have been doing that for years , sometimes with lox !
... oh you mean beagles .
" Then I saw that another responder has already mentioned Nazis , and I feared the wrath of Godwin.Then , I decided , I 've never met the guy ; might as well summon him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[...] some scientist, in Boston I believe, has successfully frozen beagles, and brought them back to life.
So I was going to reply with a joke, "The Jews have been doing that for years, sometimes with lox!
... oh you mean beagles.
"Then I saw that another responder has already mentioned Nazis, and I feared the wrath of Godwin.Then, I decided, I've never met the guy; might as well summon him.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360120</id>
	<title>Re:Oxidative damage.</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1260194340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm hoping for some time to see such things enter mainstream.</p><p>It's a horrible thing to think that I wouldn't stand a chance after many serious injuries not because of any fundamental limitations, but currently limited tech and procedures.</p><p>And it's only from my selfish point of view, I can't imagine what ambulance &amp; ER medics are going through, seeing cases which are inescapably fatal now...but we're quite certain they don't have to be.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm hoping for some time to see such things enter mainstream.It 's a horrible thing to think that I would n't stand a chance after many serious injuries not because of any fundamental limitations , but currently limited tech and procedures.And it 's only from my selfish point of view , I ca n't imagine what ambulance &amp; ER medics are going through , seeing cases which are inescapably fatal now...but we 're quite certain they do n't have to be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm hoping for some time to see such things enter mainstream.It's a horrible thing to think that I wouldn't stand a chance after many serious injuries not because of any fundamental limitations, but currently limited tech and procedures.And it's only from my selfish point of view, I can't imagine what ambulance &amp; ER medics are going through, seeing cases which are inescapably fatal now...but we're quite certain they don't have to be.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359226</id>
	<title>I disagree</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260188340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>My buddies and I have always postured what we would do if and when a zombie apocalypse broke out. All being military or former military, with the ability to bear arms and the survival skills (not to mention the remote getaway) already at our disposal, we all voted the human race as generally despicable and that it was about time there was some event to clean the slate. It's time to kick zombie ass and chew bubblegum, and I'm all outa gum.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My buddies and I have always postured what we would do if and when a zombie apocalypse broke out .
All being military or former military , with the ability to bear arms and the survival skills ( not to mention the remote getaway ) already at our disposal , we all voted the human race as generally despicable and that it was about time there was some event to clean the slate .
It 's time to kick zombie ass and chew bubblegum , and I 'm all outa gum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My buddies and I have always postured what we would do if and when a zombie apocalypse broke out.
All being military or former military, with the ability to bear arms and the survival skills (not to mention the remote getaway) already at our disposal, we all voted the human race as generally despicable and that it was about time there was some event to clean the slate.
It's time to kick zombie ass and chew bubblegum, and I'm all outa gum.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360938</id>
	<title>Re:Long Duration Space Flight</title>
	<author>ignavus</author>
	<datestamp>1260200700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Couldn't this be tweaked and used as a method of hibernation to stave off boredom...</p></div><p>...at work?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could n't this be tweaked and used as a method of hibernation to stave off boredom......at work ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Couldn't this be tweaked and used as a method of hibernation to stave off boredom......at work?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359690</id>
	<title>Re:Brain damage?</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1260191220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One of the biggies in this war is Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) - surviving explosions, surviving shots to the helmet - I wonder if we'll be swapping out a lot of dead soldiers for ones suffering extreme brain injury.</p></div><p>Cooling the brain has been known for years to work miracles on minimizing head trauma and taming neurological conditions.<br>There's no reason for soldiers who've received head injuries to <i>not</i> wear a cooling helmet for a few days after the trauma.</p><p>Someone even took the idea and <a href="http://www.thermahelm.com/" title="thermahelm.com">integrated chemical icepacks into motorcycle helmets</a> [thermahelm.com] so that the brain immediately starts getting cooled upon impact.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the biggies in this war is Traumatic Brain Injury ( TBI ) - surviving explosions , surviving shots to the helmet - I wonder if we 'll be swapping out a lot of dead soldiers for ones suffering extreme brain injury.Cooling the brain has been known for years to work miracles on minimizing head trauma and taming neurological conditions.There 's no reason for soldiers who 've received head injuries to not wear a cooling helmet for a few days after the trauma.Someone even took the idea and integrated chemical icepacks into motorcycle helmets [ thermahelm.com ] so that the brain immediately starts getting cooled upon impact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the biggies in this war is Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) - surviving explosions, surviving shots to the helmet - I wonder if we'll be swapping out a lot of dead soldiers for ones suffering extreme brain injury.Cooling the brain has been known for years to work miracles on minimizing head trauma and taming neurological conditions.There's no reason for soldiers who've received head injuries to not wear a cooling helmet for a few days after the trauma.Someone even took the idea and integrated chemical icepacks into motorcycle helmets [thermahelm.com] so that the brain immediately starts getting cooled upon impact.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30364066</id>
	<title>Re:Long Duration Space Flight</title>
	<author>msheekhah</author>
	<datestamp>1260281700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>this plus cryogenics could equal space flight to another planet for colonization.

that would be cool. of course, we'd probably have to have terraforming or biodome type shit perfected first.</htmltext>
<tokenext>this plus cryogenics could equal space flight to another planet for colonization .
that would be cool .
of course , we 'd probably have to have terraforming or biodome type shit perfected first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this plus cryogenics could equal space flight to another planet for colonization.
that would be cool.
of course, we'd probably have to have terraforming or biodome type shit perfected first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361518</id>
	<title>Re:Brain damage?</title>
	<author>aukset</author>
	<datestamp>1260205500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the field of EMS, we're (in NYS at least) by protocol asked to hyper-oxygenate patients with suspected brain injury in trauma patients that meet a certain set of criteria. The reason for this is to cause vasoconstriction within the brain, reducing blood flow due to vascular resistance and, in theory, slow internal bleeding. As far as I know, the literature on this is uncertain as to its efficacy, but the theory behind it is sound.</p><p>Brain tissue can survive for quite a while in a state of hypoxia, compared to other tissues. What is most dangerous in a hemorrhage in the brain is compression of the tissue, as well as direct exposure to blood, both of which can cause necrosis. In fact, when the brain "detects" an injury, its usual response is to increase blood pressure, which is going to accelerate any hemorrhage and make the problem worse. Decreasing heart rate and blood pressure would be an advantage until surgical services are available to drain the blood and close off the source of bleeding.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the field of EMS , we 're ( in NYS at least ) by protocol asked to hyper-oxygenate patients with suspected brain injury in trauma patients that meet a certain set of criteria .
The reason for this is to cause vasoconstriction within the brain , reducing blood flow due to vascular resistance and , in theory , slow internal bleeding .
As far as I know , the literature on this is uncertain as to its efficacy , but the theory behind it is sound.Brain tissue can survive for quite a while in a state of hypoxia , compared to other tissues .
What is most dangerous in a hemorrhage in the brain is compression of the tissue , as well as direct exposure to blood , both of which can cause necrosis .
In fact , when the brain " detects " an injury , its usual response is to increase blood pressure , which is going to accelerate any hemorrhage and make the problem worse .
Decreasing heart rate and blood pressure would be an advantage until surgical services are available to drain the blood and close off the source of bleeding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the field of EMS, we're (in NYS at least) by protocol asked to hyper-oxygenate patients with suspected brain injury in trauma patients that meet a certain set of criteria.
The reason for this is to cause vasoconstriction within the brain, reducing blood flow due to vascular resistance and, in theory, slow internal bleeding.
As far as I know, the literature on this is uncertain as to its efficacy, but the theory behind it is sound.Brain tissue can survive for quite a while in a state of hypoxia, compared to other tissues.
What is most dangerous in a hemorrhage in the brain is compression of the tissue, as well as direct exposure to blood, both of which can cause necrosis.
In fact, when the brain "detects" an injury, its usual response is to increase blood pressure, which is going to accelerate any hemorrhage and make the problem worse.
Decreasing heart rate and blood pressure would be an advantage until surgical services are available to drain the blood and close off the source of bleeding.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361826</id>
	<title>Re:Don't do it</title>
	<author>Ihmhi</author>
	<datestamp>1260208740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, if I'm shot in the foot, I'm sure as hell not gonna take that injection.</p><p>If a bullet went through my lung and I know I'm well and truly fucked, I'll take the 10\% death risk over the "let's see how long it takes medevac to get here" death risk.</p><p>Disclaimer: IANAS(oldier).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if I 'm shot in the foot , I 'm sure as hell not gon na take that injection.If a bullet went through my lung and I know I 'm well and truly fucked , I 'll take the 10 \ % death risk over the " let 's see how long it takes medevac to get here " death risk.Disclaimer : IANAS ( oldier ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if I'm shot in the foot, I'm sure as hell not gonna take that injection.If a bullet went through my lung and I know I'm well and truly fucked, I'll take the 10\% death risk over the "let's see how long it takes medevac to get here" death risk.Disclaimer: IANAS(oldier).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360086</id>
	<title>Not Zombies; River Tam</title>
	<author>Eli Gottlieb</author>
	<datestamp>1260194040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This sounds less like reanimated corpses craving brains and more like the drugs Simon gave to River so he could sneak her into the hospital on Ariel in <i>Firefly</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This sounds less like reanimated corpses craving brains and more like the drugs Simon gave to River so he could sneak her into the hospital on Ariel in Firefly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sounds less like reanimated corpses craving brains and more like the drugs Simon gave to River so he could sneak her into the hospital on Ariel in Firefly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359906</id>
	<title>are we weakening ours ability to fight?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260192660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>at the risk of seeming cold and uncaring (well, ok, maybe i am), i wonder if we are weakening our ability to wage war by putting such an extreme emphasis on preventing loss of life.  of course no one wants to die and we want to prevent unnecessary deaths, but in war people die.  our efforts, to paraphrase patton, should be to make sure that as many as possible of the other guys die, and putting so much emphasis on saving all of our guys will impede that effort.  also, as has been pointed out already, the quality of life of those saved is often so poor as to question whether they were really done any favors by saving them.  there are worse things than death<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>at the risk of seeming cold and uncaring ( well , ok , maybe i am ) , i wonder if we are weakening our ability to wage war by putting such an extreme emphasis on preventing loss of life .
of course no one wants to die and we want to prevent unnecessary deaths , but in war people die .
our efforts , to paraphrase patton , should be to make sure that as many as possible of the other guys die , and putting so much emphasis on saving all of our guys will impede that effort .
also , as has been pointed out already , the quality of life of those saved is often so poor as to question whether they were really done any favors by saving them .
there are worse things than death ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>at the risk of seeming cold and uncaring (well, ok, maybe i am), i wonder if we are weakening our ability to wage war by putting such an extreme emphasis on preventing loss of life.
of course no one wants to die and we want to prevent unnecessary deaths, but in war people die.
our efforts, to paraphrase patton, should be to make sure that as many as possible of the other guys die, and putting so much emphasis on saving all of our guys will impede that effort.
also, as has been pointed out already, the quality of life of those saved is often so poor as to question whether they were really done any favors by saving them.
there are worse things than death ....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360026</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260193620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so how exactly will they "reanimate" people?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so how exactly will they " reanimate " people ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so how exactly will they "reanimate" people?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361988</id>
	<title>Re:I disagree</title>
	<author>LuNa7ic</author>
	<datestamp>1260210300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you haven't bothered to stockpile gum, you aren't ready for the apocalypse. Good luck as zombie-chew, suckers!</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have n't bothered to stockpile gum , you are n't ready for the apocalypse .
Good luck as zombie-chew , suckers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you haven't bothered to stockpile gum, you aren't ready for the apocalypse.
Good luck as zombie-chew, suckers!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360752</id>
	<title>Re:Don't do it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260199140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Meat popsicles. The crews responsible of transferring the inanimate troops will refer their cargo as "meat popsicles".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Meat popsicles .
The crews responsible of transferring the inanimate troops will refer their cargo as " meat popsicles " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meat popsicles.
The crews responsible of transferring the inanimate troops will refer their cargo as "meat popsicles".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359604</id>
	<title>Re:Opposite of a Zombie</title>
	<author>PieSquared</author>
	<datestamp>1260190560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You've forgotten there are two parts to the process. The first part is the opposite of making zombies, yes. But the second part... reverses the first part. Therefore, zombies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've forgotten there are two parts to the process .
The first part is the opposite of making zombies , yes .
But the second part... reverses the first part .
Therefore , zombies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've forgotten there are two parts to the process.
The first part is the opposite of making zombies, yes.
But the second part... reverses the first part.
Therefore, zombies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361028</id>
	<title>Other Research on this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260201420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm guessing this "cocktail of one chemical or another" has H2S in it - very interesting stuff.</p><p>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4469793.stm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm guessing this " cocktail of one chemical or another " has H2S in it - very interesting stuff.http : //news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4469793.stm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm guessing this "cocktail of one chemical or another" has H2S in it - very interesting stuff.http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4469793.stm</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360788</id>
	<title>Re:Long Duration Space Flight</title>
	<author>maugle</author>
	<datestamp>1260199440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think they had that on the ship in 2001: A Space Odyssey.  How'd that pan out?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think they had that on the ship in 2001 : A Space Odyssey .
How 'd that pan out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think they had that on the ship in 2001: A Space Odyssey.
How'd that pan out?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360942</id>
	<title>Re:Not Zombies; River Tam</title>
	<author>SpaceCadets</author>
	<datestamp>1260200700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or what about the drugs Mal's old war buddie took to do the organ smuggling, it's been a while, but that sounds about right. 3 Joss.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or what about the drugs Mal 's old war buddie took to do the organ smuggling , it 's been a while , but that sounds about right .
3 Joss .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or what about the drugs Mal's old war buddie took to do the organ smuggling, it's been a while, but that sounds about right.
3 Joss.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363086</id>
	<title>Re:Opposite of a Zombie</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1260267840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unanimated living ? Sounds like me in the morning.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unanimated living ?
Sounds like me in the morning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unanimated living ?
Sounds like me in the morning.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359248</id>
	<title>Re:Brain damage?</title>
	<author>Reason58</author>
	<datestamp>1260188400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One of the biggies in this war is Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) - surviving explosions, surviving shots to the helmet - I wonder if we'll be swapping out a lot of dead soldiers for ones suffering extreme brain injury.</p><p>A friend of mine just came back from Germany. He lost both of his legs and has TBI caused mood swings like you wouldn't believe, and pretty much looks like it will wreck his family. Staving off death is one thing (and good); making life after injury worth living is another.</p></div><p>You are absolutely right. Many of the soldiers who take this shot will have suffered TBI and will require brains. Braaaaiiiiiins.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the biggies in this war is Traumatic Brain Injury ( TBI ) - surviving explosions , surviving shots to the helmet - I wonder if we 'll be swapping out a lot of dead soldiers for ones suffering extreme brain injury.A friend of mine just came back from Germany .
He lost both of his legs and has TBI caused mood swings like you would n't believe , and pretty much looks like it will wreck his family .
Staving off death is one thing ( and good ) ; making life after injury worth living is another.You are absolutely right .
Many of the soldiers who take this shot will have suffered TBI and will require brains .
Braaaaiiiiiins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the biggies in this war is Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) - surviving explosions, surviving shots to the helmet - I wonder if we'll be swapping out a lot of dead soldiers for ones suffering extreme brain injury.A friend of mine just came back from Germany.
He lost both of his legs and has TBI caused mood swings like you wouldn't believe, and pretty much looks like it will wreck his family.
Staving off death is one thing (and good); making life after injury worth living is another.You are absolutely right.
Many of the soldiers who take this shot will have suffered TBI and will require brains.
Braaaaiiiiiins.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360372</id>
	<title>At this point, it begins to make more sense...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260196500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to just stop making WAR!!!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>to just stop making WAR ! ! ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to just stop making WAR!!!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361004</id>
	<title>and so it begins</title>
	<author>mongrol</author>
	<datestamp>1260201240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They'll only reanimate the parts that watch TV, rent movies (repeatedly in a variety of formats, buy mobile phones (repeatedly in a variety of formats) and leave of the rest of the dissident free thinking ganglion parts dormant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll only reanimate the parts that watch TV , rent movies ( repeatedly in a variety of formats , buy mobile phones ( repeatedly in a variety of formats ) and leave of the rest of the dissident free thinking ganglion parts dormant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll only reanimate the parts that watch TV, rent movies (repeatedly in a variety of formats, buy mobile phones (repeatedly in a variety of formats) and leave of the rest of the dissident free thinking ganglion parts dormant.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30365042</id>
	<title>Re:Opposite of a Zombie</title>
	<author>fulldecent</author>
	<datestamp>1260286920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt; So the process is:<br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; 1. Put injured people in suspended animation<br>&gt;&gt; 2. Extract soul (or whatever makes us non-zombies)<br>&gt;&gt; 3. Reanimate the meatbags<br>&gt;&gt; 4. train meatbags to vote for the political party of your choice [and tithe]<br>&gt;&gt; 5. Profit!</p><p>They already do this -- it's called religion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; So the process is : &gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; 1 .
Put injured people in suspended animation &gt; &gt; 2 .
Extract soul ( or whatever makes us non-zombies ) &gt; &gt; 3 .
Reanimate the meatbags &gt; &gt; 4. train meatbags to vote for the political party of your choice [ and tithe ] &gt; &gt; 5 .
Profit ! They already do this -- it 's called religion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt; So the process is:&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; 1.
Put injured people in suspended animation&gt;&gt; 2.
Extract soul (or whatever makes us non-zombies)&gt;&gt; 3.
Reanimate the meatbags&gt;&gt; 4. train meatbags to vote for the political party of your choice [and tithe]&gt;&gt; 5.
Profit!They already do this -- it's called religion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359748</id>
	<title>Re:Oxidative damage.</title>
	<author>w0mprat</author>
	<datestamp>1260191640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>+1 informative: We'll be able to smell the zombie hordes coming. That's a useful observation, thank you. (I'm making a note for our organisations's zombie apocolypse business continuity plan)</htmltext>
<tokenext>+ 1 informative : We 'll be able to smell the zombie hordes coming .
That 's a useful observation , thank you .
( I 'm making a note for our organisations 's zombie apocolypse business continuity plan )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+1 informative: We'll be able to smell the zombie hordes coming.
That's a useful observation, thank you.
(I'm making a note for our organisations's zombie apocolypse business continuity plan)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30365402</id>
	<title>Re:are we weakening ours ability to fight?</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1260288540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>i wonder if we are weakening our ability to wage war by putting such an extreme emphasis on preventing loss of life.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
On the contrary, I'm worried that this will just encourage a state of permanent war, with none of the current bad PR about our soldiers coming home in body bags...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>i wonder if we are weakening our ability to wage war by putting such an extreme emphasis on preventing loss of life .
On the contrary , I 'm worried that this will just encourage a state of permanent war , with none of the current bad PR about our soldiers coming home in body bags.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i wonder if we are weakening our ability to wage war by putting such an extreme emphasis on preventing loss of life.
On the contrary, I'm worried that this will just encourage a state of permanent war, with none of the current bad PR about our soldiers coming home in body bags...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360386</id>
	<title>Oh great......</title>
	<author>scosco62</author>
	<datestamp>1260196620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's really no down side to this..if we can't bring them back, then then they can work at McKinsey or Bain.....</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's really no down side to this..if we ca n't bring them back , then then they can work at McKinsey or Bain.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's really no down side to this..if we can't bring them back, then then they can work at McKinsey or Bain.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30364066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359616
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361826
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363304
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30367362
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360752
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30371260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361582
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30362468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30371710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30365338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30365042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30367324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30501800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30362252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360892
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30362848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30364068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30365402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30368898
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30366480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30362824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30366538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30366120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1729236_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30362744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1729236.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363240
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30501800
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30367324
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30368898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361136
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1729236.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359236
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360130
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1729236.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30366480
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359226
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359958
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359622
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361492
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30366538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360752
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30362468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359584
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361032
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360094
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360434
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1729236.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359532
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1729236.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361018
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1729236.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361262
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363304
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30364066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30362848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360788
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1729236.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1729236.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30365338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30364068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361518
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30367362
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359788
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360234
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363136
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30371710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359248
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30362252
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363360
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359592
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1729236.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361004
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1729236.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359546
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1729236.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30371260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30365402
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1729236.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360942
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1729236.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360418
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1729236.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359766
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1729236.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30362744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30366120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361264
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1729236.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1729236.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359242
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30362824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30361536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359474
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359612
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30365042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30360892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30363086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1729236.30359398
</commentlist>
</conversation>
