<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_02_1528211</id>
	<title>LHC Knocked Out By Another Power Failure</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1259770020000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>known\_ID writes <i>"The Large Hadron Collider &mdash; the most puissant particle-punisher ever assembled by the human race &mdash; has <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/02/lhc\_power\_failure\_again/">suffered another major power failure</a>, knocking not only the atom smasher itself but even its associated websites offline."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>known \ _ID writes " The Large Hadron Collider    the most puissant particle-punisher ever assembled by the human race    has suffered another major power failure , knocking not only the atom smasher itself but even its associated websites offline .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>known\_ID writes "The Large Hadron Collider — the most puissant particle-punisher ever assembled by the human race — has suffered another major power failure, knocking not only the atom smasher itself but even its associated websites offline.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30304702</id>
	<title>Re:I'm writing this comment from 2017</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259582700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, since it was a DJ Shadow sample, it would be the RIAA that would block it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , since it was a DJ Shadow sample , it would be the RIAA that would block it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, since it was a DJ Shadow sample, it would be the RIAA that would block it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298466</id>
	<title>News of the outage emerged ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259602260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>News of the outage emerged when keen amateur LHC-watchers</p></div><p>I haven't noticed anything particular on my watch (more than 100 refreshes since this morning)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>http://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>News of the outage emerged when keen amateur LHC-watchersI have n't noticed anything particular on my watch ( more than 100 refreshes since this morning ) ...http : //hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>News of the outage emerged when keen amateur LHC-watchersI haven't noticed anything particular on my watch (more than 100 refreshes since this morning) ...http://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299626</id>
	<title>Re:Large Hardon Collider *ouch*</title>
	<author>AndrewNeo</author>
	<datestamp>1259607180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does the "pan-dimensional police force" not just scream Combine Overwatch to you? (I suppose <i>they</i> would <i>want</i> us to open the portal, though..)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does the " pan-dimensional police force " not just scream Combine Overwatch to you ?
( I suppose they would want us to open the portal , though.. )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does the "pan-dimensional police force" not just scream Combine Overwatch to you?
(I suppose they would want us to open the portal, though..)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298636</id>
	<title>WHen CERN was asked why</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1259603100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the web site information about the Large Hadron Collider had disappeared, they said "What Large Hadron Collider?" Jump into there new Ferrari and sped off to the airport.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the web site information about the Large Hadron Collider had disappeared , they said " What Large Hadron Collider ?
" Jump into there new Ferrari and sped off to the airport .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the web site information about the Large Hadron Collider had disappeared, they said "What Large Hadron Collider?
" Jump into there new Ferrari and sped off to the airport.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298558</id>
	<title>The Future called...</title>
	<author>electricbern</author>
	<datestamp>1259602740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>he said it was not his fault.</htmltext>
<tokenext>he said it was not his fault .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he said it was not his fault.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299614</id>
	<title>It's broke -</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259607120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To the poster who made this comment: <br> <br>
<a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1461356&amp;cid=30274460" title="slashdot.org">Patience</a> [slashdot.org] <br> <br>

Yea let's hope the science will begin in January/February like <b>YOU</b> claim.  Though the people who run LHC said late 2010.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To the poster who made this comment : Patience [ slashdot.org ] Yea let 's hope the science will begin in January/February like YOU claim .
Though the people who run LHC said late 2010 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To the poster who made this comment:  
Patience [slashdot.org]  

Yea let's hope the science will begin in January/February like YOU claim.
Though the people who run LHC said late 2010.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299522</id>
	<title>Re:Future doesn't want to be discovered?</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1259606760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, well, whatever mysterious force terminated all universes in which the power generator didn't fail, forgot about the backup generator!  This was nothing but the tiniest of hiccups.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , well , whatever mysterious force terminated all universes in which the power generator did n't fail , forgot about the backup generator !
This was nothing but the tiniest of hiccups .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, well, whatever mysterious force terminated all universes in which the power generator didn't fail, forgot about the backup generator!
This was nothing but the tiniest of hiccups.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298624</id>
	<title>I FOUND IT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259603040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?&amp;q=higgs+boson" title="google.com">http://maps.google.com/maps?&amp;q=higgs+boson</a> [google.com]</p><p>Does this mean I get $6 billion?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //maps.google.com/maps ? &amp;q = higgs + boson [ google.com ] Does this mean I get $ 6 billion ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://maps.google.com/maps?&amp;q=higgs+boson [google.com]Does this mean I get $6 billion?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30348256</id>
	<title>Re:Minor inconvenience</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260111060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>temporary glitch</p></div><p>Shit! They changed something in the Matrix!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>temporary glitchShit !
They changed something in the Matrix !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>temporary glitchShit!
They changed something in the Matrix!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30302954</id>
	<title>Universe is rebelling</title>
	<author>nufrosty</author>
	<datestamp>1259577000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obviously the fabric of the universe is rebelling at having its insides peeked into. Something to do with violating relativity...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously the fabric of the universe is rebelling at having its insides peeked into .
Something to do with violating relativity.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously the fabric of the universe is rebelling at having its insides peeked into.
Something to do with violating relativity...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298950</id>
	<title>Re:I'm writing this comment from 2017</title>
	<author>Leafheart</author>
	<datestamp>1259604360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What is this Disco thing you are talking about?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is this Disco thing you are talking about ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is this Disco thing you are talking about?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298568</id>
	<title>Looks like an insulator bushing...</title>
	<author>Ellis D. Tripp</author>
	<datestamp>1259602740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>which flashed over. They don't actually what the bushing is ATTACHED to, which could be almost anything. Such bushings are the standard terminal connections on HV switchgear such as transformers, capacitors, reclosers, etc. The bushing itself is most likely replaceable individually, though.</p><p>Hopefully, it just flashed over from foreign debris (another baguette?), and did little damage except to itself. Such a flashover should have tripped upstream circuit breakers, resulting in the power outage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>which flashed over .
They do n't actually what the bushing is ATTACHED to , which could be almost anything .
Such bushings are the standard terminal connections on HV switchgear such as transformers , capacitors , reclosers , etc .
The bushing itself is most likely replaceable individually , though.Hopefully , it just flashed over from foreign debris ( another baguette ?
) , and did little damage except to itself .
Such a flashover should have tripped upstream circuit breakers , resulting in the power outage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>which flashed over.
They don't actually what the bushing is ATTACHED to, which could be almost anything.
Such bushings are the standard terminal connections on HV switchgear such as transformers, capacitors, reclosers, etc.
The bushing itself is most likely replaceable individually, though.Hopefully, it just flashed over from foreign debris (another baguette?
), and did little damage except to itself.
Such a flashover should have tripped upstream circuit breakers, resulting in the power outage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298236</id>
	<title>Minor inconvenience</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since the title and summary are short on details, brace yourself, I read the article. From TFA:<p><div class="quote"><p>"Diesels cut in OK" noted the controllers, adding that the Meyrin site is now drawing limited grid power from an alternative connection via the Prevessin site. The boffins don't anticipate resuming operations until at least 12:00 local time today.</p></div><p>So it was just a temporary glitch. Move along people, nothing to see here...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the title and summary are short on details , brace yourself , I read the article .
From TFA : " Diesels cut in OK " noted the controllers , adding that the Meyrin site is now drawing limited grid power from an alternative connection via the Prevessin site .
The boffins do n't anticipate resuming operations until at least 12 : 00 local time today.So it was just a temporary glitch .
Move along people , nothing to see here.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the title and summary are short on details, brace yourself, I read the article.
From TFA:"Diesels cut in OK" noted the controllers, adding that the Meyrin site is now drawing limited grid power from an alternative connection via the Prevessin site.
The boffins don't anticipate resuming operations until at least 12:00 local time today.So it was just a temporary glitch.
Move along people, nothing to see here...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298700</id>
	<title>engineers vs. scientists</title>
	<author>Lord Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1259603280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is what happens when you send scientists and academics to do the work experienced engineers should be doing.</p><p>Academics don't even see failure like this as a bad thing. It's an interesting point of study, which may help them learn, etc.. Engineers just want to make shit work, so they overengineer the parts that make them nervous, do component testing ahead of time, and generally make things happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is what happens when you send scientists and academics to do the work experienced engineers should be doing.Academics do n't even see failure like this as a bad thing .
It 's an interesting point of study , which may help them learn , etc.. Engineers just want to make shit work , so they overengineer the parts that make them nervous , do component testing ahead of time , and generally make things happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is what happens when you send scientists and academics to do the work experienced engineers should be doing.Academics don't even see failure like this as a bad thing.
It's an interesting point of study, which may help them learn, etc.. Engineers just want to make shit work, so they overengineer the parts that make them nervous, do component testing ahead of time, and generally make things happen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298634</id>
	<title>Re:Huh?</title>
	<author>Joce640k</author>
	<datestamp>1259603040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least they didn't measure the cable run in furlongs only to have the supplier deliver in bushels. Before the plug fell out of the wall.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least they did n't measure the cable run in furlongs only to have the supplier deliver in bushels .
Before the plug fell out of the wall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least they didn't measure the cable run in furlongs only to have the supplier deliver in bushels.
Before the plug fell out of the wall.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299424</id>
	<title>Re:Take it easy people ...</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1259606400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>how much did it cost. Let me see here (Checks Popular Science)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... $6 BILLION! WTF?! </i></p><p>It's still money better spent there than on wars of occupation, bailing out reckless investment banks, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>how much did it cost .
Let me see here ( Checks Popular Science ) ... $ 6 BILLION !
WTF ? ! It 's still money better spent there than on wars of occupation , bailing out reckless investment banks , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how much did it cost.
Let me see here (Checks Popular Science) ... $6 BILLION!
WTF?! It's still money better spent there than on wars of occupation, bailing out reckless investment banks, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298828</id>
	<title>Re:Take it easy people ...</title>
	<author>ultramk</author>
	<datestamp>1259603820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...Yes, it cost $6b.</p><p>To put this in perspective, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle program cost $5.6b, and the resulting machine sucks.</p><p>Which is the bigger waste?</p><p>M-</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...Yes , it cost $ 6b.To put this in perspective , the Bradley Fighting Vehicle program cost $ 5.6b , and the resulting machine sucks.Which is the bigger waste ? M-</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Yes, it cost $6b.To put this in perspective, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle program cost $5.6b, and the resulting machine sucks.Which is the bigger waste?M-</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298882</id>
	<title>Re:I'm writing this comment from 2017</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259604120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, damn.  Not again.  I thought we sorted that problem out in the 1980s!</p><p>Look, just don't install any full-length mirrors at the LHC and we should be fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , damn .
Not again .
I thought we sorted that problem out in the 1980s ! Look , just do n't install any full-length mirrors at the LHC and we should be fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, damn.
Not again.
I thought we sorted that problem out in the 1980s!Look, just don't install any full-length mirrors at the LHC and we should be fine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299448</id>
	<title>Re:engineers vs. scientists</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259606580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Academics don't even see failure like this as a bad thing</i></p><p>That's just not true.  An experiment that provides data is never a failure.  An experiment that does not provide data due to technical problems is a failure.  It's a waste of time and resources, scientists hate that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Academics do n't even see failure like this as a bad thingThat 's just not true .
An experiment that provides data is never a failure .
An experiment that does not provide data due to technical problems is a failure .
It 's a waste of time and resources , scientists hate that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Academics don't even see failure like this as a bad thingThat's just not true.
An experiment that provides data is never a failure.
An experiment that does not provide data due to technical problems is a failure.
It's a waste of time and resources, scientists hate that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299790</id>
	<title>Re:The sign of the failure of particle physics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259607960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously?  We shouldn't use proven technology to back up new technology because were better than that.  I bet the LHC also uses a wheel somewhere in there, and that technology is 1000s of years old.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously ?
We should n't use proven technology to back up new technology because were better than that .
I bet the LHC also uses a wheel somewhere in there , and that technology is 1000s of years old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously?
We shouldn't use proven technology to back up new technology because were better than that.
I bet the LHC also uses a wheel somewhere in there, and that technology is 1000s of years old.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298410</id>
	<title>I hope it's true</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259602020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not sure how much the LHC has actually ended up costing.<br>
I don't know if it's possible to prove this time-travelling higgs theory without attempting to build several more LHC scale colliders.<br>
<br>
But if it's true, the cost has/will have been worth it.  Maybe it's not in the list of breakthrough discoveries we were hoping for, but wouldn't it be mind-bogglingly amazing anyway?  I don't think pure science gets much better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure how much the LHC has actually ended up costing .
I do n't know if it 's possible to prove this time-travelling higgs theory without attempting to build several more LHC scale colliders .
But if it 's true , the cost has/will have been worth it .
Maybe it 's not in the list of breakthrough discoveries we were hoping for , but would n't it be mind-bogglingly amazing anyway ?
I do n't think pure science gets much better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure how much the LHC has actually ended up costing.
I don't know if it's possible to prove this time-travelling higgs theory without attempting to build several more LHC scale colliders.
But if it's true, the cost has/will have been worth it.
Maybe it's not in the list of breakthrough discoveries we were hoping for, but wouldn't it be mind-bogglingly amazing anyway?
I don't think pure science gets much better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298188</id>
	<title>video of the event</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Luckily some other website managed to capture a video of the event from the webcam's: http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Luckily some other website managed to capture a video of the event from the webcam 's : http : //www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Luckily some other website managed to capture a video of the event from the webcam's: http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300916</id>
	<title>OK. So ....</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1259613300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... who is the wise guy who screwed in an incandescent bulb?</htmltext>
<tokenext>... who is the wise guy who screwed in an incandescent bulb ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... who is the wise guy who screwed in an incandescent bulb?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298832</id>
	<title>Re:Future doesn't want to be discovered?</title>
	<author>khallow</author>
	<datestamp>1259603820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How can I remember something that hasn't happened yet?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can I remember something that has n't happened yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can I remember something that hasn't happened yet?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298992</id>
	<title>Re:Bagel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259604480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dammit, man, It'd been a baguette, not a bagel!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dammit , man , It 'd been a baguette , not a bagel !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dammit, man, It'd been a baguette, not a bagel!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30304484</id>
	<title>Re:What do you want, a medal?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259582040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ok!</p><p> <a href="http://www.slowpokecomics.com/strips/terminatrix.html" title="slowpokecomics.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.slowpokecomics.com/strips/terminatrix.html</a> [slowpokecomics.com] </p></div><p>Nahh, if humans of the future picked someone to come back in time and save the human race, they'd have picked someone who could remember his lines without a teleprompter.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok !
http : //www.slowpokecomics.com/strips/terminatrix.html [ slowpokecomics.com ] Nahh , if humans of the future picked someone to come back in time and save the human race , they 'd have picked someone who could remember his lines without a teleprompter .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok!
http://www.slowpokecomics.com/strips/terminatrix.html [slowpokecomics.com] Nahh, if humans of the future picked someone to come back in time and save the human race, they'd have picked someone who could remember his lines without a teleprompter.
:-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299574</id>
	<title>Re:Huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259606940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They out-sourced the design to Harley Davidson.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They out-sourced the design to Harley Davidson .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They out-sourced the design to Harley Davidson.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30301298</id>
	<title>Re:The sign of the failure of particle physics</title>
	<author>thelonious</author>
	<datestamp>1259571660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The detail of information they are gathering now would make Schroedinger need a nap.  Sure burning hydrogenated carbon to release energy is an "old" technology.  But in case you haven't noticed the world is still grappling with a better way to store energy.  You need energy to research energy.  If you are suggesting that they should only be powered by a 60 year old nuclear power plant or some other "futuristic" power source then you are putting some really bizarre and nonsensical  restrictions on physics research.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The detail of information they are gathering now would make Schroedinger need a nap .
Sure burning hydrogenated carbon to release energy is an " old " technology .
But in case you have n't noticed the world is still grappling with a better way to store energy .
You need energy to research energy .
If you are suggesting that they should only be powered by a 60 year old nuclear power plant or some other " futuristic " power source then you are putting some really bizarre and nonsensical restrictions on physics research .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The detail of information they are gathering now would make Schroedinger need a nap.
Sure burning hydrogenated carbon to release energy is an "old" technology.
But in case you haven't noticed the world is still grappling with a better way to store energy.
You need energy to research energy.
If you are suggesting that they should only be powered by a 60 year old nuclear power plant or some other "futuristic" power source then you are putting some really bizarre and nonsensical  restrictions on physics research.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30306532</id>
	<title>Thanks, Slashdotters!</title>
	<author>zevans</author>
	<datestamp>1259593020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love how problems are reported almost instantly, but anything interesting and successful like first beams, first splash, or first collisions, takes a day. Or two.</p><p>I wonder if we will learn new physics by comparing the speed of bad news and good news. I think pointing-and-laughing might even be superluminal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love how problems are reported almost instantly , but anything interesting and successful like first beams , first splash , or first collisions , takes a day .
Or two.I wonder if we will learn new physics by comparing the speed of bad news and good news .
I think pointing-and-laughing might even be superluminal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love how problems are reported almost instantly, but anything interesting and successful like first beams, first splash, or first collisions, takes a day.
Or two.I wonder if we will learn new physics by comparing the speed of bad news and good news.
I think pointing-and-laughing might even be superluminal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30304868</id>
	<title>Re:Take it easy people ...</title>
	<author>Flere Imsaho</author>
	<datestamp>1259583420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait until the LHC produces a black hole. Then you'll see some real suck.</p><p>"To put this in perspective, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle program cost $5.6b, and the resulting machine sucks."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait until the LHC produces a black hole .
Then you 'll see some real suck .
" To put this in perspective , the Bradley Fighting Vehicle program cost $ 5.6b , and the resulting machine sucks .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait until the LHC produces a black hole.
Then you'll see some real suck.
"To put this in perspective, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle program cost $5.6b, and the resulting machine sucks.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298828</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299902</id>
	<title>Re:Live Report</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259608380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm nowhere near it and it's spooky. That means it's spooky action from a distance...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm nowhere near it and it 's spooky .
That means it 's spooky action from a distance.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm nowhere near it and it's spooky.
That means it's spooky action from a distance...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30302406</id>
	<title>Re:Huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259575260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> I mean, their plugs are so superior...</p></div><p> American plastic industry is more than capable of producing very well made plugs of all sizes for various needs...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , their plugs are so superior... American plastic industry is more than capable of producing very well made plugs of all sizes for various needs.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I mean, their plugs are so superior... American plastic industry is more than capable of producing very well made plugs of all sizes for various needs...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298264</id>
	<title>Nice work.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nice work, Professor Lester Knight Chaykin.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice work , Professor Lester Knight Chaykin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice work, Professor Lester Knight Chaykin.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298674</id>
	<title>If it was</title>
	<author>JustOK</author>
	<datestamp>1259603220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now, if it was Google running it, they would just have said it was a beta and not a big deal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , if it was Google running it , they would just have said it was a beta and not a big deal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, if it was Google running it, they would just have said it was a beta and not a big deal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298288</id>
	<title>Birdy bread-bomber from the future</title>
	<author>Barryke</author>
	<datestamp>1259601420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>FTA<blockquote><div><p>"Maybe it was a birdy bread-bomber from the future," jokes Chris Stephens of the LHC Portal - referring to the well-known wingnut theory that that the mere possibility of the LHC unmasking certain phenomena engenders forces which act backwards through time to sabotage it before this can happen.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA " Maybe it was a birdy bread-bomber from the future , " jokes Chris Stephens of the LHC Portal - referring to the well-known wingnut theory that that the mere possibility of the LHC unmasking certain phenomena engenders forces which act backwards through time to sabotage it before this can happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA"Maybe it was a birdy bread-bomber from the future," jokes Chris Stephens of the LHC Portal - referring to the well-known wingnut theory that that the mere possibility of the LHC unmasking certain phenomena engenders forces which act backwards through time to sabotage it before this can happen.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298204</id>
	<title>All new ultra-cool technologies have thier issues.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you ever tried to dab ointment on a swimming shark?!?!  Noooooo.  You haven't.  The scale-rot around the laser mounting points was terrrible in the beginning, but that Safeway-Brand polysporin does the trick.</p><p>Nothing to see here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you ever tried to dab ointment on a swimming shark ? ! ? !
Noooooo. You have n't .
The scale-rot around the laser mounting points was terrrible in the beginning , but that Safeway-Brand polysporin does the trick.Nothing to see here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you ever tried to dab ointment on a swimming shark?!?!
Noooooo.  You haven't.
The scale-rot around the laser mounting points was terrrible in the beginning, but that Safeway-Brand polysporin does the trick.Nothing to see here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298350</id>
	<title>Re:I'm writing this comment from 2017</title>
	<author>mantis2009</author>
	<datestamp>1259601720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whoever modded this +1 Informative, you are awesome.  I would +1 Funny your entire life if I could.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whoever modded this + 1 Informative , you are awesome .
I would + 1 Funny your entire life if I could .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whoever modded this +1 Informative, you are awesome.
I would +1 Funny your entire life if I could.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299462</id>
	<title>Re:engineers vs. scientists</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259606580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously man, you need to get your head out of your ass. Or are you saying that you have expertise in running 8500 amp connections while maintaining 2K temperature.</p><p>http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/amps/2008-September/063020.html</p><p>"I noticed the klystons - 48 x 100kw units to produce 4.8MW at 400MHz.</p><p>I also noticed the cooling arrangements for the ring - liquid helium to maintain the 1.7 Kelvin temperature. If you click on the ring graphic on http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/ you will get the real time temperature readings for the magnets etc in the ring.</p><p>The power supplies are also quite amazing = 18V at 18000 amps at 5mV ripple.</p><p>Engineering in the extreme!<br>"</p><p>Seriously, the entire machine is one of a kind, not OTS stuff. And yes, it is not only physicists designing the machine, but electrical scientists with more know how than any of the people that "overengineer the parts that make them nervous". The notion that something makes them nervous indicates they know shit about it in the first place.</p><p>The most obvious errors in a machine like this are in the assembly phase worked on my the people you would entrust the design to. Well, here's the result!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously man , you need to get your head out of your ass .
Or are you saying that you have expertise in running 8500 amp connections while maintaining 2K temperature.http : //lists.contesting.com/pipermail/amps/2008-September/063020.html " I noticed the klystons - 48 x 100kw units to produce 4.8MW at 400MHz.I also noticed the cooling arrangements for the ring - liquid helium to maintain the 1.7 Kelvin temperature .
If you click on the ring graphic on http : //lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/ you will get the real time temperature readings for the magnets etc in the ring.The power supplies are also quite amazing = 18V at 18000 amps at 5mV ripple.Engineering in the extreme !
" Seriously , the entire machine is one of a kind , not OTS stuff .
And yes , it is not only physicists designing the machine , but electrical scientists with more know how than any of the people that " overengineer the parts that make them nervous " .
The notion that something makes them nervous indicates they know shit about it in the first place.The most obvious errors in a machine like this are in the assembly phase worked on my the people you would entrust the design to .
Well , here 's the result !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously man, you need to get your head out of your ass.
Or are you saying that you have expertise in running 8500 amp connections while maintaining 2K temperature.http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/amps/2008-September/063020.html"I noticed the klystons - 48 x 100kw units to produce 4.8MW at 400MHz.I also noticed the cooling arrangements for the ring - liquid helium to maintain the 1.7 Kelvin temperature.
If you click on the ring graphic on http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/ you will get the real time temperature readings for the magnets etc in the ring.The power supplies are also quite amazing = 18V at 18000 amps at 5mV ripple.Engineering in the extreme!
"Seriously, the entire machine is one of a kind, not OTS stuff.
And yes, it is not only physicists designing the machine, but electrical scientists with more know how than any of the people that "overengineer the parts that make them nervous".
The notion that something makes them nervous indicates they know shit about it in the first place.The most obvious errors in a machine like this are in the assembly phase worked on my the people you would entrust the design to.
Well, here's the result!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298374</id>
	<title>Re:Future doesn't want to be discovered?</title>
	<author>Bazer</author>
	<datestamp>1259601780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Funny you mention this. From the article:<p><div class="quote"><p>"Maybe it was a birdy bread-bomber from the future," jokes Chris Stephens of the LHC Portal - referring to the well-known wingnut theory that that the mere possibility of the LHC unmasking certain phenomena engenders forces which act backwards through time to sabotage it before this can happen.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny you mention this .
From the article : " Maybe it was a birdy bread-bomber from the future , " jokes Chris Stephens of the LHC Portal - referring to the well-known wingnut theory that that the mere possibility of the LHC unmasking certain phenomena engenders forces which act backwards through time to sabotage it before this can happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny you mention this.
From the article:"Maybe it was a birdy bread-bomber from the future," jokes Chris Stephens of the LHC Portal - referring to the well-known wingnut theory that that the mere possibility of the LHC unmasking certain phenomena engenders forces which act backwards through time to sabotage it before this can happen.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298718</id>
	<title>Sabotage?</title>
	<author>Orion Blastar</author>
	<datestamp>1259603400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I Can't Stand It I Know You Planned It<br>I'ma' Set It Straight This Watergate<br>I Can't Stand Rockin' When I'm In Here<br>'Cause Your Crystal Bal Ain't So Crystal Clear<br>So While You Sit Back And Wonder Why I Got This Fuckin' Thorn In My Side<br>Oh My God It's A Mirage<br>I'm Tellin' Y'all It's Sabotage</p><p>So many people want the LHC to fail or stop so it won't "destroy the world, hur hur hur" so is it possible someone has been sabotaging it from the inside or even outside?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I Ca n't Stand It I Know You Planned ItI'ma ' Set It Straight This WatergateI Ca n't Stand Rockin ' When I 'm In Here'Cause Your Crystal Bal Ai n't So Crystal ClearSo While You Sit Back And Wonder Why I Got This Fuckin ' Thorn In My SideOh My God It 's A MirageI 'm Tellin ' Y'all It 's SabotageSo many people want the LHC to fail or stop so it wo n't " destroy the world , hur hur hur " so is it possible someone has been sabotaging it from the inside or even outside ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I Can't Stand It I Know You Planned ItI'ma' Set It Straight This WatergateI Can't Stand Rockin' When I'm In Here'Cause Your Crystal Bal Ain't So Crystal ClearSo While You Sit Back And Wonder Why I Got This Fuckin' Thorn In My SideOh My God It's A MirageI'm Tellin' Y'all It's SabotageSo many people want the LHC to fail or stop so it won't "destroy the world, hur hur hur" so is it possible someone has been sabotaging it from the inside or even outside?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300504</id>
	<title>From the article</title>
	<author>Mr. Freeman</author>
	<datestamp>1259611260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"just 1.9 degrees above absolute zero - colder than deep space."<br>This statement is completely false and meaningless.  Deep space is EMPTY and thus DOES NOT HAVE A TEMPERATURE.  Yes, 1.9 K is cold, but it has nothing to do with space.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" just 1.9 degrees above absolute zero - colder than deep space .
" This statement is completely false and meaningless .
Deep space is EMPTY and thus DOES NOT HAVE A TEMPERATURE .
Yes , 1.9 K is cold , but it has nothing to do with space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"just 1.9 degrees above absolute zero - colder than deep space.
"This statement is completely false and meaningless.
Deep space is EMPTY and thus DOES NOT HAVE A TEMPERATURE.
Yes, 1.9 K is cold, but it has nothing to do with space.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300584</id>
	<title>You know...</title>
	<author>RonMcMahon</author>
	<datestamp>1259611680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm SURE Kirk and Spock are behind this.  They did an 'ok' job, but to really get things undone right they need to bring Scotty with them next time!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm SURE Kirk and Spock are behind this .
They did an 'ok ' job , but to really get things undone right they need to bring Scotty with them next time !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm SURE Kirk and Spock are behind this.
They did an 'ok' job, but to really get things undone right they need to bring Scotty with them next time!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30308596</id>
	<title>Large Scottish Collider</title>
	<author>shani</author>
	<datestamp>1259836140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Um. It's the UK that has superior plugs. If only they'd had the common sense to build the damned thing in Scotland like I told them, it wouldn't keep having all these failures.</p></div><p>The problem with Scotland is that you'd have the locals constantly attacking all the scientists and giving them a <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk\_news/scotland/4257966.stm" title="bbc.co.uk">damn good kickin'</a> [bbc.co.uk].</p><p>OTOH, we could hope for an ideal solution, where a black hole is formed, but then evaporates just after it has consumed the matter in a sphere extending to Hadrian's wall.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Um .
It 's the UK that has superior plugs .
If only they 'd had the common sense to build the damned thing in Scotland like I told them , it would n't keep having all these failures.The problem with Scotland is that you 'd have the locals constantly attacking all the scientists and giving them a damn good kickin ' [ bbc.co.uk ] .OTOH , we could hope for an ideal solution , where a black hole is formed , but then evaporates just after it has consumed the matter in a sphere extending to Hadrian 's wall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um.
It's the UK that has superior plugs.
If only they'd had the common sense to build the damned thing in Scotland like I told them, it wouldn't keep having all these failures.The problem with Scotland is that you'd have the locals constantly attacking all the scientists and giving them a damn good kickin' [bbc.co.uk].OTOH, we could hope for an ideal solution, where a black hole is formed, but then evaporates just after it has consumed the matter in a sphere extending to Hadrian's wall.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299108</id>
	<title>Reverse time wave resistance to Higgs boson</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259604960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is just a continuation of the reverse time-wave resistance to the creation of the utterly abhorrent Higg's Boson, and proof that they're getting closer to creating one!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is just a continuation of the reverse time-wave resistance to the creation of the utterly abhorrent Higg 's Boson , and proof that they 're getting closer to creating one !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is just a continuation of the reverse time-wave resistance to the creation of the utterly abhorrent Higg's Boson, and proof that they're getting closer to creating one!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298222</id>
	<title>Large Hardon Collider *ouch*</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the article:<p><div class="quote"><p>We ourselves find it hard not to suspect the involvement of some pan-dimensional police force, seeking to prevent humanity acquiring parallel-universe portal capability before we're ready to use it responsibly.</p></div><p>I have devoted a large portion of my life to playing countless hours of Doom and Halflife, reading Kurt Vonnegut novels, and watching numerous reruns of Quantum Leap and Sliders... I think I'm "ready to use it"!
<br> <br>
Oh, wait... "responsibly"... hmm...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : We ourselves find it hard not to suspect the involvement of some pan-dimensional police force , seeking to prevent humanity acquiring parallel-universe portal capability before we 're ready to use it responsibly.I have devoted a large portion of my life to playing countless hours of Doom and Halflife , reading Kurt Vonnegut novels , and watching numerous reruns of Quantum Leap and Sliders... I think I 'm " ready to use it " !
Oh , wait... " responsibly " ... hmm.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article:We ourselves find it hard not to suspect the involvement of some pan-dimensional police force, seeking to prevent humanity acquiring parallel-universe portal capability before we're ready to use it responsibly.I have devoted a large portion of my life to playing countless hours of Doom and Halflife, reading Kurt Vonnegut novels, and watching numerous reruns of Quantum Leap and Sliders... I think I'm "ready to use it"!
Oh, wait... "responsibly"... hmm...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30303956</id>
	<title>Re:engineers vs. scientists</title>
	<author>xkcdFan1011011101111</author>
	<datestamp>1259580120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>some academics are engineers, you insensitive clod!</htmltext>
<tokenext>some academics are engineers , you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>some academics are engineers, you insensitive clod!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298348</id>
	<title>Take it easy people ...</title>
	<author>abbynormal brain</author>
	<datestamp>1259601660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Following 1912, we learned how to properly top "water-tight" containers on ships (Titanic)<br>In 1940 we took bridge building back to the drawing board (Tacoma Narrows Bridge)<br>In 1996 we slapped a mathematician for not properly handling floating point decimals - it only cost $6M (Ariane 5)</p><p>We learned so much from these things and it was bound to happen with the LHC as well. I mean, c'mon! It only cost<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... hmm<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... how much did it cost. Let me see here (Checks Popular Science)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...  $6 BILLION! WTF?! Forget what I said, get a rope!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Following 1912 , we learned how to properly top " water-tight " containers on ships ( Titanic ) In 1940 we took bridge building back to the drawing board ( Tacoma Narrows Bridge ) In 1996 we slapped a mathematician for not properly handling floating point decimals - it only cost $ 6M ( Ariane 5 ) We learned so much from these things and it was bound to happen with the LHC as well .
I mean , c'mon !
It only cost ... hmm ... how much did it cost .
Let me see here ( Checks Popular Science ) ... $ 6 BILLION !
WTF ? ! Forget what I said , get a rope !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Following 1912, we learned how to properly top "water-tight" containers on ships (Titanic)In 1940 we took bridge building back to the drawing board (Tacoma Narrows Bridge)In 1996 we slapped a mathematician for not properly handling floating point decimals - it only cost $6M (Ariane 5)We learned so much from these things and it was bound to happen with the LHC as well.
I mean, c'mon!
It only cost ... hmm ... how much did it cost.
Let me see here (Checks Popular Science) ...  $6 BILLION!
WTF?! Forget what I said, get a rope!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300172</id>
	<title>Re:engineers vs. scientists</title>
	<author>Abcd1234</author>
	<datestamp>1259609760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, because I'm sure no engineers worked on the LHC.  The whole thing was built by a bunch of theoretical physicists.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>::rollseyes::</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , because I 'm sure no engineers worked on the LHC .
The whole thing was built by a bunch of theoretical physicists .
: : rollseyes : :</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, because I'm sure no engineers worked on the LHC.
The whole thing was built by a bunch of theoretical physicists.
::rollseyes::</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299620</id>
	<title>Re:Is this a good thing to happen now?</title>
	<author>Hasai</author>
	<datestamp>1259607180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's French engineering. French engineering NEVER fails "gracefully."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's French engineering .
French engineering NEVER fails " gracefully .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's French engineering.
French engineering NEVER fails "gracefully.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298232</id>
	<title>Huh?</title>
	<author>R2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1259601120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does Europe not produce competent electrical engineers?  I mean, their plugs are so superior...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does Europe not produce competent electrical engineers ?
I mean , their plugs are so superior.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does Europe not produce competent electrical engineers?
I mean, their plugs are so superior...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299802</id>
	<title>Here's a solution for the problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259607960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why don't the scientists modify the phase variance or reverse the polarity? It seems to work every time something goes wrong in Star Trek......</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't the scientists modify the phase variance or reverse the polarity ?
It seems to work every time something goes wrong in Star Trek..... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't the scientists modify the phase variance or reverse the polarity?
It seems to work every time something goes wrong in Star Trek......</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30301114</id>
	<title>Compared to Fermilab?</title>
	<author>Roger W Moore</author>
	<datestamp>1259614260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Before you make a comment like that you should compare the LHC performance to the restart of the Tevatron at Fermilab (and this was a restart not a new accelerator!). Having been there when it was happening the number of power cuts was far in excess of what the LHC has experienced so far. Indeed at one point the power cut out about twice a week which was far more of a problem for the Tevatron since it took almost a day to make enough antiprotons.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Before you make a comment like that you should compare the LHC performance to the restart of the Tevatron at Fermilab ( and this was a restart not a new accelerator ! ) .
Having been there when it was happening the number of power cuts was far in excess of what the LHC has experienced so far .
Indeed at one point the power cut out about twice a week which was far more of a problem for the Tevatron since it took almost a day to make enough antiprotons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Before you make a comment like that you should compare the LHC performance to the restart of the Tevatron at Fermilab (and this was a restart not a new accelerator!).
Having been there when it was happening the number of power cuts was far in excess of what the LHC has experienced so far.
Indeed at one point the power cut out about twice a week which was far more of a problem for the Tevatron since it took almost a day to make enough antiprotons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30340916</id>
	<title>Oh them fancy words</title>
	<author>blake182</author>
	<datestamp>1260031560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, you can just say "powerful" and get the same alliterative effect...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , you can just say " powerful " and get the same alliterative effect.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, you can just say "powerful" and get the same alliterative effect...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298174</id>
	<title>Live Report</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259600880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is BBC news reporting live from LHC<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... ~buzz~</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is BBC news reporting live from LHC .... ~ buzz ~</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is BBC news reporting live from LHC .... ~buzz~</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30305780</id>
	<title>Re:engineers vs. scientists</title>
	<author>smoker2</author>
	<datestamp>1259587680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So no engineers were involved in the design yes ? Is that what you're saying ? A 25km underground ring with some of the most advanced machines on the planet and you reckon it was all drawn up in a D&amp;D meeting ? <br>
Tosser !</htmltext>
<tokenext>So no engineers were involved in the design yes ?
Is that what you 're saying ?
A 25km underground ring with some of the most advanced machines on the planet and you reckon it was all drawn up in a D&amp;D meeting ?
Tosser !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So no engineers were involved in the design yes ?
Is that what you're saying ?
A 25km underground ring with some of the most advanced machines on the planet and you reckon it was all drawn up in a D&amp;D meeting ?
Tosser !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298822</id>
	<title>What do you want, a medal?</title>
	<author>snowwrestler</author>
	<datestamp>1259603820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok!</p><p><a href="http://www.slowpokecomics.com/strips/terminatrix.html" title="slowpokecomics.com">http://www.slowpokecomics.com/strips/terminatrix.html</a> [slowpokecomics.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok ! http : //www.slowpokecomics.com/strips/terminatrix.html [ slowpokecomics.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok!http://www.slowpokecomics.com/strips/terminatrix.html [slowpokecomics.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298420</id>
	<title>Re:I'm writing this comment from 2017</title>
	<author>Zarf</author>
	<datestamp>1259602140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Darn time-travelers always screwing up my plans for world domination!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Darn time-travelers always screwing up my plans for world domination !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Darn time-travelers always screwing up my plans for world domination!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184</id>
	<title>I'm writing this comment from 2017</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259600940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The power outage was my idea. You're welcome.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The power outage was my idea .
You 're welcome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The power outage was my idea.
You're welcome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298444</id>
	<title>Too much LHC QQ</title>
	<author>HuckleCom</author>
	<datestamp>1259602200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe it's just me - but it's like the U.S. media when all we see are 'LHC fails this, LHC fails that', not even newsworthy here.

A town without power is a bigger deal than this but we don't spam<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. about it...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it 's just me - but it 's like the U.S. media when all we see are 'LHC fails this , LHC fails that ' , not even newsworthy here .
A town without power is a bigger deal than this but we do n't spam / .
about it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it's just me - but it's like the U.S. media when all we see are 'LHC fails this, LHC fails that', not even newsworthy here.
A town without power is a bigger deal than this but we don't spam /.
about it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30302382</id>
	<title>Re:And once again, the world is safe</title>
	<author>lennier</author>
	<datestamp>1259575200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So was it Sapphire.... or Steel?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So was it Sapphire.... or Steel ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So was it Sapphire.... or Steel?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299200</id>
	<title>Re:Large Hardon Collider *ouch*</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259605320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A hardon collider..? That'd really be "ouch"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A hardon collider.. ?
That 'd really be " ouch "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A hardon collider..?
That'd really be "ouch"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298180</id>
	<title>FP!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259600940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>first particle!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>first particle !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>first particle!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300246</id>
	<title>Re:Minor inconvenience</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259610120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...a great many boffins died to bring you this information....<nobr> <wbr></nobr>//obligatory.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...a great many boffins died to bring you this information.... //obligatory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...a great many boffins died to bring you this information.... //obligatory.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298592</id>
	<title>Re:What's that widget?</title>
	<author>damien\_kane</author>
	<datestamp>1259602860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anyone know what that fried out component is in the picture on TFA?</p></div><p>I'm pretty sure it's Amy Winehouse<br>
I could be wrong, though</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone know what that fried out component is in the picture on TFA ? I 'm pretty sure it 's Amy Winehouse I could be wrong , though</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone know what that fried out component is in the picture on TFA?I'm pretty sure it's Amy Winehouse
I could be wrong, though
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30301248</id>
	<title>Re:The Future</title>
	<author>TangoMargarine</author>
	<datestamp>1259614680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All these other worlds are yours...</htmltext>
<tokenext>All these other worlds are yours.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All these other worlds are yours...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300380</id>
	<title>Re:And once again, the world is safe</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1259610720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're not nameless. It's <a href="http://slashdot.org/~mcgrew/journal/241840" title="slashdot.org">Rority, Gumal, and Rula.</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're not nameless .
It 's Rority , Gumal , and Rula .
[ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're not nameless.
It's Rority, Gumal, and Rula.
[slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200</id>
	<title>Future doesn't want to be discovered?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone remember <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/biology\_evolution/article6879293.ece" title="timesonline.co.uk">this?</a> [timesonline.co.uk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone remember this ?
[ timesonline.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone remember this?
[timesonline.co.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300412</id>
	<title>Re:engineers vs. scientists</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259610840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly.  And engineers need to stop writing craptacular software and firmware.  Stick to hardware, you guys are better at it.  Leave the software to the professionals.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
And engineers need to stop writing craptacular software and firmware .
Stick to hardware , you guys are better at it .
Leave the software to the professionals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
And engineers need to stop writing craptacular software and firmware.
Stick to hardware, you guys are better at it.
Leave the software to the professionals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300684</id>
	<title>Dude, where's my GW Data?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259612220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I stored all my Global Warming data on the website...I can't find it now. What will I do now? I know, I'll just make it up!!<br>Signed,</p><p>Al Gore and friends.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I stored all my Global Warming data on the website...I ca n't find it now .
What will I do now ?
I know , I 'll just make it up !
! Signed,Al Gore and friends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I stored all my Global Warming data on the website...I can't find it now.
What will I do now?
I know, I'll just make it up!
!Signed,Al Gore and friends.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298968</id>
	<title>Is this a good thing to happen now?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259604420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to wonder, is it better that these glitches and outages are happening now rather than later?</p><p>What would happen if the LHC gets up to full capacity, THEN has a system-killing power outage? Does the LHC shut down gracefully, or could it be a disaster waiting to happen?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to wonder , is it better that these glitches and outages are happening now rather than later ? What would happen if the LHC gets up to full capacity , THEN has a system-killing power outage ?
Does the LHC shut down gracefully , or could it be a disaster waiting to happen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to wonder, is it better that these glitches and outages are happening now rather than later?What would happen if the LHC gets up to full capacity, THEN has a system-killing power outage?
Does the LHC shut down gracefully, or could it be a disaster waiting to happen?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298806</id>
	<title>You're asking if anyone remembers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259603820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the same stupid meme that comes up everytime the LHC runs into a problem?  Why gee, no, I don't remember that meme that morons like you post every other month.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the same stupid meme that comes up everytime the LHC runs into a problem ?
Why gee , no , I do n't remember that meme that morons like you post every other month .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the same stupid meme that comes up everytime the LHC runs into a problem?
Why gee, no, I don't remember that meme that morons like you post every other month.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299142</id>
	<title>Think of the movies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259605080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Think of all the movie plots that this thing is generating. Soon we'll be enjoying such films as:</p><p>Attack of the Bagle Birds.<br>Revenge of the Bagle Birds.<br>Bagle Birds do Dallas.<br>The sound of Bagle Birds.<br>The Bagle Birds of Madison County.<br>Power Rangers: Bagle Bird Transformations.<br>Sailor Bagle Bird.<br>White Christmas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of all the movie plots that this thing is generating .
Soon we 'll be enjoying such films as : Attack of the Bagle Birds.Revenge of the Bagle Birds.Bagle Birds do Dallas.The sound of Bagle Birds.The Bagle Birds of Madison County.Power Rangers : Bagle Bird Transformations.Sailor Bagle Bird.White Christmas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think of all the movie plots that this thing is generating.
Soon we'll be enjoying such films as:Attack of the Bagle Birds.Revenge of the Bagle Birds.Bagle Birds do Dallas.The sound of Bagle Birds.The Bagle Birds of Madison County.Power Rangers: Bagle Bird Transformations.Sailor Bagle Bird.White Christmas.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30308880</id>
	<title>"Boffins"?</title>
	<author>kestasjk</author>
	<datestamp>1259841180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The boffins don't anticipate resuming operations until at least 18:30 local time today</p></div><p> <i>Please</i> don't call workers at CERN (or anyone for that matter) "boffins".. Unless you are a writer in the 1930s working on a Beano comic you have no right to use the words "boffin", "toff", or "boner" (at least not to describe a joke).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The boffins do n't anticipate resuming operations until at least 18 : 30 local time today Please do n't call workers at CERN ( or anyone for that matter ) " boffins " .. Unless you are a writer in the 1930s working on a Beano comic you have no right to use the words " boffin " , " toff " , or " boner " ( at least not to describe a joke ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The boffins don't anticipate resuming operations until at least 18:30 local time today Please don't call workers at CERN (or anyone for that matter) "boffins".. Unless you are a writer in the 1930s working on a Beano comic you have no right to use the words "boffin", "toff", or "boner" (at least not to describe a joke).
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299426</id>
	<title>Re:Live Report</title>
	<author>Zediker</author>
	<datestamp>1259606400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When you have so many paranoid loonies out there who think your machine will end the world... It is legitimate to assume it is all sabotage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When you have so many paranoid loonies out there who think your machine will end the world... It is legitimate to assume it is all sabotage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you have so many paranoid loonies out there who think your machine will end the world... It is legitimate to assume it is all sabotage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298962</id>
	<title>Re:I'm writing this comment from 2017</title>
	<author>Ephemeriis</author>
	<datestamp>1259604420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>We are unable to transmit through conscious neural interference. You are receiving this broadcast as a dream. We are transmitting from the year two zero one seven.</i> </p></div><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince\_of\_Darkness\_(film)" title="wikipedia.org">Very Nicely Done</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We are unable to transmit through conscious neural interference .
You are receiving this broadcast as a dream .
We are transmitting from the year two zero one seven .
Very Nicely Done [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext> We are unable to transmit through conscious neural interference.
You are receiving this broadcast as a dream.
We are transmitting from the year two zero one seven.
Very Nicely Done [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300776</id>
	<title>Re:I'm writing this comment from 2017</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1259612640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Toast again.  How is the sandwich coming?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Toast again .
How is the sandwich coming ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Toast again.
How is the sandwich coming?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298714</id>
	<title>Re:Future doesn't want to be discovered?</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1259603340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone remember that doing something no one ever did is difficult ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone remember that doing something no one ever did is difficult ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone remember that doing something no one ever did is difficult ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299782</id>
	<title>Re:Too much LHC QQ</title>
	<author>Ant P.</author>
	<datestamp>1259607900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The LHC is at least the size of a town.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The LHC is at least the size of a town .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The LHC is at least the size of a town.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30348446</id>
	<title>Re:Is this a good thing to happen now?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260112680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Neither nor. As stated in the article, the diesel generators kicked in, and nothing happened. It was just a glich.</p><p>If the generators weren&rsquo;t working too, though, then the super-cooling would die. And that would mean the superconducting cables would stop being superconducting. Imagine <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cc/CERN-cables-p1030764.jpg" title="wikimedia.org">the tiny white cable that you see here</a> [wikimedia.org], getting all the power of the huge array of cables next to it. Now imagine it times ten.<br>Along the whole tunnel.</p><p>This then causes the liquid helium to vaporize/ignite/explode. Something like that.</p><p>I don&rsquo;t think there would be anything left.</p><p>(And as always in nature, everything in between can also happen (except on a quantum level). And there are other factors (dimensions) with their own scales. Then on top of that, everything is relative.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Neither nor .
As stated in the article , the diesel generators kicked in , and nothing happened .
It was just a glich.If the generators weren    t working too , though , then the super-cooling would die .
And that would mean the superconducting cables would stop being superconducting .
Imagine the tiny white cable that you see here [ wikimedia.org ] , getting all the power of the huge array of cables next to it .
Now imagine it times ten.Along the whole tunnel.This then causes the liquid helium to vaporize/ignite/explode .
Something like that.I don    t think there would be anything left .
( And as always in nature , everything in between can also happen ( except on a quantum level ) .
And there are other factors ( dimensions ) with their own scales .
Then on top of that , everything is relative .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Neither nor.
As stated in the article, the diesel generators kicked in, and nothing happened.
It was just a glich.If the generators weren’t working too, though, then the super-cooling would die.
And that would mean the superconducting cables would stop being superconducting.
Imagine the tiny white cable that you see here [wikimedia.org], getting all the power of the huge array of cables next to it.
Now imagine it times ten.Along the whole tunnel.This then causes the liquid helium to vaporize/ignite/explode.
Something like that.I don’t think there would be anything left.
(And as always in nature, everything in between can also happen (except on a quantum level).
And there are other factors (dimensions) with their own scales.
Then on top of that, everything is relative.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300020</id>
	<title>Re:video of the event</title>
	<author>tohands</author>
	<datestamp>1259609040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>ok enough already, everyone saw that video, it's been posted the day after LHC started for the first time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>ok enough already , everyone saw that video , it 's been posted the day after LHC started for the first time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ok enough already, everyone saw that video, it's been posted the day after LHC started for the first time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299268</id>
	<title>Re:Minor inconvenience</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259605560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right now that's</p><blockquote><div><p>The boffins don't anticipate resuming operations until at least 18:30 local time today.</p></div></blockquote><p>Wouldn't happen if they called Scotty.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Right now that'sThe boffins do n't anticipate resuming operations until at least 18 : 30 local time today.Would n't happen if they called Scotty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right now that'sThe boffins don't anticipate resuming operations until at least 18:30 local time today.Wouldn't happen if they called Scotty.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300058</id>
	<title>Well it does use 10\% of all of Geneva's power</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259609220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://lhc-machine-outreach.web.cern.ch/lhc-machine-outreach/faq/lhc-energy-consumption.htm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //lhc-machine-outreach.web.cern.ch/lhc-machine-outreach/faq/lhc-energy-consumption.htm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://lhc-machine-outreach.web.cern.ch/lhc-machine-outreach/faq/lhc-energy-consumption.htm</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300128</id>
	<title>Re:Huh?</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1259609520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's those damn rebels. You construct one little device with the power to destroy a planet and immediately you have dozens of those little pissants insisting on doing "trench runs" and dropping explosives down any vent they can find. It's really annoying.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's those damn rebels .
You construct one little device with the power to destroy a planet and immediately you have dozens of those little pissants insisting on doing " trench runs " and dropping explosives down any vent they can find .
It 's really annoying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's those damn rebels.
You construct one little device with the power to destroy a planet and immediately you have dozens of those little pissants insisting on doing "trench runs" and dropping explosives down any vent they can find.
It's really annoying.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299690</id>
	<title>Re:Take it easy people ...</title>
	<author>Bigjeff5</author>
	<datestamp>1259607480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, since the Bradley Fighting Vehicle actually drives, and the Large Hadron Collider has not, as yet, collided any hadrons, the LHC is easilly the bigger waste.</p><p>Now, if they ever get the damn thing running and start colliding hardrons largely (:P) then yeah, the Bradley wins hands down for biggest waste.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , since the Bradley Fighting Vehicle actually drives , and the Large Hadron Collider has not , as yet , collided any hadrons , the LHC is easilly the bigger waste.Now , if they ever get the damn thing running and start colliding hardrons largely ( : P ) then yeah , the Bradley wins hands down for biggest waste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, since the Bradley Fighting Vehicle actually drives, and the Large Hadron Collider has not, as yet, collided any hadrons, the LHC is easilly the bigger waste.Now, if they ever get the damn thing running and start colliding hardrons largely (:P) then yeah, the Bradley wins hands down for biggest waste.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298828</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30307068</id>
	<title>Re:Compared to Fermilab?</title>
	<author>dfenstrate</author>
	<datestamp>1259598000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The thing is, when you put together any absurdly complex facility that has never been built before, or it's been a long time since one has been built, you're going to get issues like this.</p><p>There's only so many issues you can account for and so many things you can forsee.</p><p>The proper operation of such facilities requires thousands of active components (compressors, instruments, etc) and hundreds of thousands of passive components (wires, aligned parts, structural members, etc) to do their jobs correctly. Even if you strive to eliminate single points of failure with redundancy and diversity of equipment, you're still gonna be surprised. A lot.</p><p>If it only takes them two years to iron out the bugs I'll be satisfied that the money was well spent. Now, the next guys building a similar facility should strive to not repeat any mistakes, and your talk of the Tevatron implies that happened with the LHC.</p><p>Anyway, carry on. Nothing to see here, just a 'normal' shakedown cruise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing is , when you put together any absurdly complex facility that has never been built before , or it 's been a long time since one has been built , you 're going to get issues like this.There 's only so many issues you can account for and so many things you can forsee.The proper operation of such facilities requires thousands of active components ( compressors , instruments , etc ) and hundreds of thousands of passive components ( wires , aligned parts , structural members , etc ) to do their jobs correctly .
Even if you strive to eliminate single points of failure with redundancy and diversity of equipment , you 're still gon na be surprised .
A lot.If it only takes them two years to iron out the bugs I 'll be satisfied that the money was well spent .
Now , the next guys building a similar facility should strive to not repeat any mistakes , and your talk of the Tevatron implies that happened with the LHC.Anyway , carry on .
Nothing to see here , just a 'normal ' shakedown cruise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing is, when you put together any absurdly complex facility that has never been built before, or it's been a long time since one has been built, you're going to get issues like this.There's only so many issues you can account for and so many things you can forsee.The proper operation of such facilities requires thousands of active components (compressors, instruments, etc) and hundreds of thousands of passive components (wires, aligned parts, structural members, etc) to do their jobs correctly.
Even if you strive to eliminate single points of failure with redundancy and diversity of equipment, you're still gonna be surprised.
A lot.If it only takes them two years to iron out the bugs I'll be satisfied that the money was well spent.
Now, the next guys building a similar facility should strive to not repeat any mistakes, and your talk of the Tevatron implies that happened with the LHC.Anyway, carry on.
Nothing to see here, just a 'normal' shakedown cruise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30301114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298496</id>
	<title>Re:Live Report</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259602440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>All the action around the LHC is getting pretty spooky...even from up close...</htmltext>
<tokenext>All the action around the LHC is getting pretty spooky...even from up close.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the action around the LHC is getting pretty spooky...even from up close...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298758</id>
	<title>The sign of the failure of particle physics</title>
	<author>Kupfernigk</author>
	<datestamp>1259603580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is that actually they still have to rely on backup Diesels. It takes technology over 100 years old to keep the LHC running in a power outage. Schroedinger did his best work over 80 years ago. The Manhattan project was successful over 60 years ago. Yet we still have to rely on lumps of metal being banged around by crude chemical combustion to provide backup power for cutting edge research.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that actually they still have to rely on backup Diesels .
It takes technology over 100 years old to keep the LHC running in a power outage .
Schroedinger did his best work over 80 years ago .
The Manhattan project was successful over 60 years ago .
Yet we still have to rely on lumps of metal being banged around by crude chemical combustion to provide backup power for cutting edge research .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that actually they still have to rely on backup Diesels.
It takes technology over 100 years old to keep the LHC running in a power outage.
Schroedinger did his best work over 80 years ago.
The Manhattan project was successful over 60 years ago.
Yet we still have to rely on lumps of metal being banged around by crude chemical combustion to provide backup power for cutting edge research.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298574</id>
	<title>Did we just slashdot the LHC?</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1259602800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oops!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oops !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oops!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30309422</id>
	<title>Re:I'm writing this comment from 2017</title>
	<author>BadBlood</author>
	<datestamp>1259850300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Excellent Prince of Darkness reference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Excellent Prince of Darkness reference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Excellent Prince of Darkness reference.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298560</id>
	<title>John Titor's fault</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259602740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>he needed a replacement miniature black hole for his suitcase-time-machine</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>he needed a replacement miniature black hole for his suitcase-time-machine</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he needed a replacement miniature black hole for his suitcase-time-machine</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298980</id>
	<title>Re:Live Report</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1259604480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Failing for the same Vista failed probably.. being rushed into operation before it's time..
</p><p>
Also parts and architecture designed/implemented  with assistance by the  lowestBidder(TM)
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Failing for the same Vista failed probably.. being rushed into operation before it 's time. . Also parts and architecture designed/implemented with assistance by the lowestBidder ( TM )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Failing for the same Vista failed probably.. being rushed into operation before it's time..

Also parts and architecture designed/implemented  with assistance by the  lowestBidder(TM)
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30348202</id>
	<title>Re:Sabotage?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260110640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*imagines* LHC guys driving and running around the tunnels, looking and acting like the guys from <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4PN7Xbexq4" title="youtube.com">the Sabotage video</a> [youtube.com]. With the music running in the background!</p><p>Boy, I wish I could film that. And I bet the LHC guys would be all in. It would spread trough the Internet like wildfire.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* imagines * LHC guys driving and running around the tunnels , looking and acting like the guys from the Sabotage video [ youtube.com ] .
With the music running in the background ! Boy , I wish I could film that .
And I bet the LHC guys would be all in .
It would spread trough the Internet like wildfire .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*imagines* LHC guys driving and running around the tunnels, looking and acting like the guys from the Sabotage video [youtube.com].
With the music running in the background!Boy, I wish I could film that.
And I bet the LHC guys would be all in.
It would spread trough the Internet like wildfire.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298834</id>
	<title>Janitorial services revealed as the culprit</title>
	<author>motherjoe</author>
	<datestamp>1259603880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This just in.... LHC had an abrupt power failure.</p><p>Our field reporter at CERN is providing his update..... "Well at first we thought we had yet another problem with the LHC." reports a source who wishes to be anonymous. "Well, we are now pretty sure it was just Ed. Ed comes in on Wednesdays to clean up in the Lab. Soon as he plugged in that damn hoover all the breakers tripped."</p><p>So there you have it, a hoover and $39.95 breaker brought it all the a halt today.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This just in.... LHC had an abrupt power failure.Our field reporter at CERN is providing his update..... " Well at first we thought we had yet another problem with the LHC .
" reports a source who wishes to be anonymous .
" Well , we are now pretty sure it was just Ed .
Ed comes in on Wednesdays to clean up in the Lab .
Soon as he plugged in that damn hoover all the breakers tripped .
" So there you have it , a hoover and $ 39.95 breaker brought it all the a halt today .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This just in.... LHC had an abrupt power failure.Our field reporter at CERN is providing his update..... "Well at first we thought we had yet another problem with the LHC.
" reports a source who wishes to be anonymous.
"Well, we are now pretty sure it was just Ed.
Ed comes in on Wednesdays to clean up in the Lab.
Soon as he plugged in that damn hoover all the breakers tripped.
"So there you have it, a hoover and $39.95 breaker brought it all the a halt today.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298266</id>
	<title>Re:I'm writing this comment from 2017</title>
	<author>cpu\_fusion</author>
	<datestamp>1259601360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>We are unable to transmit through conscious neural interference. You are receiving this broadcast as a dream. We are transmitting from the year two zero one seven.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are unable to transmit through conscious neural interference .
You are receiving this broadcast as a dream .
We are transmitting from the year two zero one seven .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are unable to transmit through conscious neural interference.
You are receiving this broadcast as a dream.
We are transmitting from the year two zero one seven.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299640</id>
	<title>Re:I'm writing this comment from 2017</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259607240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you Windows 7 too...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you Windows 7 too.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you Windows 7 too...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30306274</id>
	<title>Re:Dang those future guys</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259590980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What, is the future ruled by Candlejack or som</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What , is the future ruled by Candlejack or som</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, is the future ruled by Candlejack or som</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30308886</id>
	<title>I'm curious</title>
	<author>SterlingX</author>
	<datestamp>1259841180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would a nanosized charged spinning toroidal black hole evaporate?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would a nanosized charged spinning toroidal black hole evaporate ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would a nanosized charged spinning toroidal black hole evaporate?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30302336</id>
	<title>Re:Take it easy people ...</title>
	<author>renrutal</author>
	<datestamp>1259575080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...Yes, it cost $6b.</p><p>To put this in perspective, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle program cost $5.6b, and the resulting machine sucks.</p><p>Which is the bigger waste?</p></div><p>So they've got a black hole generator for 400 million less.

Sounds like a winner.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Yes , it cost $ 6b.To put this in perspective , the Bradley Fighting Vehicle program cost $ 5.6b , and the resulting machine sucks.Which is the bigger waste ? So they 've got a black hole generator for 400 million less .
Sounds like a winner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Yes, it cost $6b.To put this in perspective, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle program cost $5.6b, and the resulting machine sucks.Which is the bigger waste?So they've got a black hole generator for 400 million less.
Sounds like a winner.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298828</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298194</id>
	<title>And once again, the world is safe</title>
	<author>Abreu</author>
	<datestamp>1259601000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks to the efforts of nameless heroes, the evil LHC has been foiled again, ensuring the survival of earth...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks to the efforts of nameless heroes , the evil LHC has been foiled again , ensuring the survival of earth.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks to the efforts of nameless heroes, the evil LHC has been foiled again, ensuring the survival of earth...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300312</id>
	<title>Re:engineers vs. scientists</title>
	<author>cblack</author>
	<datestamp>1259610420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your idea of the LHC commissioning being in the hands of typical investigative scientists is incorrect. In the area of particle physics there are two big sets of expertise: theoretical physicists and experimental physicists. It is the EPs that design and build the components of the LHC and they have plenty of engineering expertise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your idea of the LHC commissioning being in the hands of typical investigative scientists is incorrect .
In the area of particle physics there are two big sets of expertise : theoretical physicists and experimental physicists .
It is the EPs that design and build the components of the LHC and they have plenty of engineering expertise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your idea of the LHC commissioning being in the hands of typical investigative scientists is incorrect.
In the area of particle physics there are two big sets of expertise: theoretical physicists and experimental physicists.
It is the EPs that design and build the components of the LHC and they have plenty of engineering expertise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298532</id>
	<title>Bagel</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1259602620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Was it another bird with a bagel crumb?</p><p>The first 6 billion dollars doesn't include bagel protection. That is an additional 6 billion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was it another bird with a bagel crumb ? The first 6 billion dollars does n't include bagel protection .
That is an additional 6 billion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was it another bird with a bagel crumb?The first 6 billion dollars doesn't include bagel protection.
That is an additional 6 billion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298450</id>
	<title>What's that widget?</title>
	<author>stei7766</author>
	<datestamp>1259602200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone know what that fried out component is in the picture on TFA?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone know what that fried out component is in the picture on TFA ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone know what that fried out component is in the picture on TFA?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299612</id>
	<title>at least they have a sense of humor</title>
	<author>ILuvRamen</author>
	<datestamp>1259607120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At the end of TFA, they mention of course that idiotic "back in time" theory about the particles.  Instead they counter with something that it is sadly actualy more logical:<br>
We ourselves find it hard not to suspect the involvement of some pan-dimensional police force, seeking to prevent humanity acquiring parallel-universe portal capability before we're ready to use it responsibly</htmltext>
<tokenext>At the end of TFA , they mention of course that idiotic " back in time " theory about the particles .
Instead they counter with something that it is sadly actualy more logical : We ourselves find it hard not to suspect the involvement of some pan-dimensional police force , seeking to prevent humanity acquiring parallel-universe portal capability before we 're ready to use it responsibly</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At the end of TFA, they mention of course that idiotic "back in time" theory about the particles.
Instead they counter with something that it is sadly actualy more logical:
We ourselves find it hard not to suspect the involvement of some pan-dimensional police force, seeking to prevent humanity acquiring parallel-universe portal capability before we're ready to use it responsibly</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30305284</id>
	<title>On Schedule</title>
	<author>Wardish</author>
	<datestamp>1259585220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This delay, like all the others, as well as the delays to come maintain the actual start date at December 12  2012.</p><p>All hail the creation of the Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator, immediately followed by an earth shattering KABOOM!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This delay , like all the others , as well as the delays to come maintain the actual start date at December 12 2012.All hail the creation of the Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator , immediately followed by an earth shattering KABOOM !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This delay, like all the others, as well as the delays to come maintain the actual start date at December 12  2012.All hail the creation of the Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator, immediately followed by an earth shattering KABOOM!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30306996</id>
	<title>Re:Is this a good thing to happen now?</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1259597220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Does the LHC shut down gracefully...</p><p>Yes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Does the LHC shut down gracefully...Yes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Does the LHC shut down gracefully...Yes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299714</id>
	<title>It's the Eschaton</title>
	<author>Ratface</author>
	<datestamp>1259607600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good ol' Stross: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles\_Stross#Eschaton\_series" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles\_Stross#Eschaton\_series</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good ol ' Stross : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles \ _Stross # Eschaton \ _series [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good ol' Stross: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles\_Stross#Eschaton\_series [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299636</id>
	<title>European Power System</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259607240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I was in Italy, a bolt of lightning followed by the rumble of thunder and sure and poo the lights were out. I remember the last day as a gamer. I was playing Final Fantasy 8 and running around building my character for 8 hours. My only bad was not saving during that time and BOOM the power is out. A storm some 25 miles away knocked out the power. Have not finished that game. Maybe the designers should take that into consideration and build some good power and get it to work and that way Europe can follow suit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was in Italy , a bolt of lightning followed by the rumble of thunder and sure and poo the lights were out .
I remember the last day as a gamer .
I was playing Final Fantasy 8 and running around building my character for 8 hours .
My only bad was not saving during that time and BOOM the power is out .
A storm some 25 miles away knocked out the power .
Have not finished that game .
Maybe the designers should take that into consideration and build some good power and get it to work and that way Europe can follow suit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was in Italy, a bolt of lightning followed by the rumble of thunder and sure and poo the lights were out.
I remember the last day as a gamer.
I was playing Final Fantasy 8 and running around building my character for 8 hours.
My only bad was not saving during that time and BOOM the power is out.
A storm some 25 miles away knocked out the power.
Have not finished that game.
Maybe the designers should take that into consideration and build some good power and get it to work and that way Europe can follow suit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30301346</id>
	<title>Using French in the article summary?</title>
	<author>Kingrames</author>
	<datestamp>1259571840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's something poisson -y going on here...</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's something poisson -y going on here.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's something poisson -y going on here...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299964</id>
	<title>OMG! Turn it off forever!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259608740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure this series of events is god's way of telling us to stop using the LHC before it's too late, and we're all destroyed!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure this series of events is god 's way of telling us to stop using the LHC before it 's too late , and we 're all destroyed !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure this series of events is god's way of telling us to stop using the LHC before it's too late, and we're all destroyed!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300174</id>
	<title>Uninterruptible power supply?</title>
	<author>diggon</author>
	<datestamp>1259609760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Uninterruptible power supply?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Uninterruptible power supply ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uninterruptible power supply?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30305548</id>
	<title>Re:Is this a good thing to happen now?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259586300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, no, this is not interesting, the thousands of highly skilled people involved in building this marvel of technology have thought of the first thing that came up in your mind and thousands of other potential problems and have taken measures to avoid catastrophe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , no , this is not interesting , the thousands of highly skilled people involved in building this marvel of technology have thought of the first thing that came up in your mind and thousands of other potential problems and have taken measures to avoid catastrophe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, no, this is not interesting, the thousands of highly skilled people involved in building this marvel of technology have thought of the first thing that came up in your mind and thousands of other potential problems and have taken measures to avoid catastrophe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299162</id>
	<title>OMG! It's true!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259605140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just tried to create a particle accelerator in my garage out of some Pringles cans and duct tape, and I totally failed to create a Higgs boson. Stupid Higgs boson sent a ripple back in time to make sure my Pringles-can collider failed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just tried to create a particle accelerator in my garage out of some Pringles cans and duct tape , and I totally failed to create a Higgs boson .
Stupid Higgs boson sent a ripple back in time to make sure my Pringles-can collider failed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just tried to create a particle accelerator in my garage out of some Pringles cans and duct tape, and I totally failed to create a Higgs boson.
Stupid Higgs boson sent a ripple back in time to make sure my Pringles-can collider failed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300702</id>
	<title>Re:Future doesn't want to be discovered?</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1259612280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, this is starting to track the  plotline in
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein's\_Bridge\_(book)" title="wikipedia.org">Einstein's Bridge</a> [wikipedia.org]. Although that was written back when the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting\_Super\_Collider" title="wikipedia.org">SSC</a> [wikipedia.org] was still being planned. Time travelers come back from the future to trigger events that will side track progress in physics and technology which lead to the SSC becoming operational, triggering the destruction of the earth.
</p><p>IIRC, one of the things that these time travelers did was to cripple scientific collaboration over the Internet. They did so by intervening early in the development of OSs and networking by ensuring that a small company attempting to market crappy products would rise to dominance. That company was Microsoft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , this is starting to track the plotline in Einstein 's Bridge [ wikipedia.org ] .
Although that was written back when the SSC [ wikipedia.org ] was still being planned .
Time travelers come back from the future to trigger events that will side track progress in physics and technology which lead to the SSC becoming operational , triggering the destruction of the earth .
IIRC , one of the things that these time travelers did was to cripple scientific collaboration over the Internet .
They did so by intervening early in the development of OSs and networking by ensuring that a small company attempting to market crappy products would rise to dominance .
That company was Microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, this is starting to track the  plotline in
Einstein's Bridge [wikipedia.org].
Although that was written back when the SSC [wikipedia.org] was still being planned.
Time travelers come back from the future to trigger events that will side track progress in physics and technology which lead to the SSC becoming operational, triggering the destruction of the earth.
IIRC, one of the things that these time travelers did was to cripple scientific collaboration over the Internet.
They did so by intervening early in the development of OSs and networking by ensuring that a small company attempting to market crappy products would rise to dominance.
That company was Microsoft.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299024</id>
	<title>Re:I'm writing this comment from 2017</title>
	<author>LordAndrewSama</author>
	<datestamp>1259604660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Due to retroactive copyright legislation, the dream you were about to have has been blocked.  Please pay &pound;2500 to view this dream.  Attempt to view this dream again and you will be prosecuted for premature copyright violation(Under article 554455456 of the DMCA(2017)).<br>Your corporate overlord<br>Dreamworks</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Due to retroactive copyright legislation , the dream you were about to have has been blocked .
Please pay   2500 to view this dream .
Attempt to view this dream again and you will be prosecuted for premature copyright violation ( Under article 554455456 of the DMCA ( 2017 ) ) .Your corporate overlordDreamworks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Due to retroactive copyright legislation, the dream you were about to have has been blocked.
Please pay £2500 to view this dream.
Attempt to view this dream again and you will be prosecuted for premature copyright violation(Under article 554455456 of the DMCA(2017)).Your corporate overlordDreamworks</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299492</id>
	<title>Re:The sign of the failure of particle physics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259606640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, it's worse than that -- many of the structural elements are made of steel, smelted, cast, and machined using processes that go back even further than Diesel.</p><p>OMG y dont we kill these jiants insted of stand on there sholdiers!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , it 's worse than that -- many of the structural elements are made of steel , smelted , cast , and machined using processes that go back even further than Diesel.OMG y dont we kill these jiants insted of stand on there sholdiers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, it's worse than that -- many of the structural elements are made of steel, smelted, cast, and machined using processes that go back even further than Diesel.OMG y dont we kill these jiants insted of stand on there sholdiers!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298904</id>
	<title>Re:Huh?</title>
	<author>iapetus</author>
	<datestamp>1259604180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um. It's the UK that has superior plugs. If only they'd had the common sense to build the damned thing in Scotland like I told them, it wouldn't keep having all these failures.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um .
It 's the UK that has superior plugs .
If only they 'd had the common sense to build the damned thing in Scotland like I told them , it would n't keep having all these failures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um.
It's the UK that has superior plugs.
If only they'd had the common sense to build the damned thing in Scotland like I told them, it wouldn't keep having all these failures.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298732</id>
	<title>Re:What's that widget?</title>
	<author>burne</author>
	<datestamp>1259603460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like a cable termination inside a switching station.</p><p><a href="http://www04.abb.com/global/gad/gad02007.nsf/0/BB71704EAD5AFA9AC12574F90052BE30/$File/Termination\_SOT242\_244-1\_244-3\_PB\_Kabeldon\_720.jpg" title="abb.com">http://www04.abb.com/global/gad/gad02007.nsf/0/BB71704EAD5AFA9AC12574F90052BE30/$File/Termination\_SOT242\_244-1\_244-3\_PB\_Kabeldon\_720.jpg</a> [abb.com] for a similar picture.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like a cable termination inside a switching station.http : //www04.abb.com/global/gad/gad02007.nsf/0/BB71704EAD5AFA9AC12574F90052BE30/ $ File/Termination \ _SOT242 \ _244-1 \ _244-3 \ _PB \ _Kabeldon \ _720.jpg [ abb.com ] for a similar picture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like a cable termination inside a switching station.http://www04.abb.com/global/gad/gad02007.nsf/0/BB71704EAD5AFA9AC12574F90052BE30/$File/Termination\_SOT242\_244-1\_244-3\_PB\_Kabeldon\_720.jpg [abb.com] for a similar picture.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298812</id>
	<title>Re:Future doesn't want to be discovered?</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1259603820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're asking whether we remember a crackpot theory that was advanced less than two months ago? How could we forget it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're asking whether we remember a crackpot theory that was advanced less than two months ago ?
How could we forget it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're asking whether we remember a crackpot theory that was advanced less than two months ago?
How could we forget it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299354</id>
	<title>Re:Minor inconvenience</title>
	<author>thelonious</author>
	<datestamp>1259606040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's those damn boffins!  At it again I see!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's those damn boffins !
At it again I see !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's those damn boffins!
At it again I see!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299812</id>
	<title>Douglas Adams knows why...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259608080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.</p><p>There is another theory which states that this has already happened."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here , it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.There is another theory which states that this has already happened .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.There is another theory which states that this has already happened.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298742</id>
	<title>Too big to fail</title>
	<author>freeasinrealale</author>
	<datestamp>1259603520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So its us v. the future. And we ARE gonna win. Spent too much on the LHC. Too big to fail. Failure is not an option. Damn!</htmltext>
<tokenext>So its us v. the future .
And we ARE gon na win .
Spent too much on the LHC .
Too big to fail .
Failure is not an option .
Damn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So its us v. the future.
And we ARE gonna win.
Spent too much on the LHC.
Too big to fail.
Failure is not an option.
Damn!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298810</id>
	<title>Re:Minor inconvenience</title>
	<author>TooMuchToDo</author>
	<datestamp>1259603820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Temporary or not, I still got paged and had to deal with it last night =(</htmltext>
<tokenext>Temporary or not , I still got paged and had to deal with it last night = (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Temporary or not, I still got paged and had to deal with it last night =(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300202</id>
	<title>Re:Take it easy people ...</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1259609880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Forget what I said, get a rope!</p></div></blockquote><p>I enjoy rope skipping as much as the next guy but what does it have to do with the LHC?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget what I said , get a rope ! I enjoy rope skipping as much as the next guy but what does it have to do with the LHC ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget what I said, get a rope!I enjoy rope skipping as much as the next guy but what does it have to do with the LHC?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30321846</id>
	<title>Russian Roulette</title>
	<author>bar-agent</author>
	<datestamp>1259919060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This reminds me of that Rihanna song:</p><blockquote><div><p>He says 'Close your eyes, sometimes it helps.'<br>And then I get a scary thought--<br>That he's here means he's never lost.</p></div></blockquote><p>We're still here. That means it was the other universe that bit it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This reminds me of that Rihanna song : He says 'Close your eyes , sometimes it helps .
'And then I get a scary thought--That he 's here means he 's never lost.We 're still here .
That means it was the other universe that bit it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This reminds me of that Rihanna song:He says 'Close your eyes, sometimes it helps.
'And then I get a scary thought--That he's here means he's never lost.We're still here.
That means it was the other universe that bit it.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298594</id>
	<title>Re:Large Hardon Collider *ouch*</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1259602860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suspect Kilgore Trout is somehow responsible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect Kilgore Trout is somehow responsible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect Kilgore Trout is somehow responsible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298920</id>
	<title>Re:What's that widget?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259604240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Register helpfully identifies it as "lhc\_blown\_bit".  Surely that's all you need to know?  Any more information would rule out uninformed speculation, and that would never do.</p><p>Seriously, my guess would be a couple of power line insulators (stacked in a yard, and probably nothing to do with CERN).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Register helpfully identifies it as " lhc \ _blown \ _bit " .
Surely that 's all you need to know ?
Any more information would rule out uninformed speculation , and that would never do.Seriously , my guess would be a couple of power line insulators ( stacked in a yard , and probably nothing to do with CERN ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Register helpfully identifies it as "lhc\_blown\_bit".
Surely that's all you need to know?
Any more information would rule out uninformed speculation, and that would never do.Seriously, my guess would be a couple of power line insulators (stacked in a yard, and probably nothing to do with CERN).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30301120</id>
	<title>what's wrong with these guys?</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1259614320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i mean, how hard can it be to run a large hadron collider anyways? like changing the oil in your car! sheesh</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i mean , how hard can it be to run a large hadron collider anyways ?
like changing the oil in your car !
sheesh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i mean, how hard can it be to run a large hadron collider anyways?
like changing the oil in your car!
sheesh</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30303702</id>
	<title>Re:Take it easy people ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259579280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...Yes, it cost $6b.</p><p>To put this in perspective, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle program cost $5.6b, and the resulting machine sucks.</p><p>Which is the bigger waste?</p><p>M-</p></div><p>During the Gulf War, M2 Bradleys destroyed more Iraqi armored vehicles than the M1 Abrams. It generally replaces the M113 which had only a single machine gun mount out in the open. It's somewhat vulnerable to IEDs and RPGs, but in practice causalities have been light. It can fire on the move due to the active stabilization of the cockpit. I've been in one. You feel a lot safer in one than in an M113 or an armored Humvee. I'd say bar the M1 tank, it's pretty safe. It does what it was designed to do.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Yes , it cost $ 6b.To put this in perspective , the Bradley Fighting Vehicle program cost $ 5.6b , and the resulting machine sucks.Which is the bigger waste ? M-During the Gulf War , M2 Bradleys destroyed more Iraqi armored vehicles than the M1 Abrams .
It generally replaces the M113 which had only a single machine gun mount out in the open .
It 's somewhat vulnerable to IEDs and RPGs , but in practice causalities have been light .
It can fire on the move due to the active stabilization of the cockpit .
I 've been in one .
You feel a lot safer in one than in an M113 or an armored Humvee .
I 'd say bar the M1 tank , it 's pretty safe .
It does what it was designed to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Yes, it cost $6b.To put this in perspective, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle program cost $5.6b, and the resulting machine sucks.Which is the bigger waste?M-During the Gulf War, M2 Bradleys destroyed more Iraqi armored vehicles than the M1 Abrams.
It generally replaces the M113 which had only a single machine gun mount out in the open.
It's somewhat vulnerable to IEDs and RPGs, but in practice causalities have been light.
It can fire on the move due to the active stabilization of the cockpit.
I've been in one.
You feel a lot safer in one than in an M113 or an armored Humvee.
I'd say bar the M1 tank, it's pretty safe.
It does what it was designed to do.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298828</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30302878</id>
	<title>What next ?</title>
	<author>piper5ul</author>
	<datestamp>1259576760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This LHC cant seem to catch a break -  magnets, bird sh$$ ,  power,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. what next  - H1 N1 ??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This LHC cant seem to catch a break - magnets , bird sh $ $ , power , .. what next - H1 N1 ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This LHC cant seem to catch a break -  magnets, bird sh$$ ,  power, .. what next  - H1 N1 ?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298808</id>
	<title>Re:I'm writing this comment from 2017</title>
	<author>JockTroll</author>
	<datestamp>1259603820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>You are receiving this broadcast in order to alter the events you are seeing. Our technology has not developed a transmitter strong enough to reach your conscious state of awareness, but this is not a dream. You are seeing what is actually occurring for the purpose of causality violation.</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are receiving this broadcast in order to alter the events you are seeing .
Our technology has not developed a transmitter strong enough to reach your conscious state of awareness , but this is not a dream .
You are seeing what is actually occurring for the purpose of causality violation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are receiving this broadcast in order to alter the events you are seeing.
Our technology has not developed a transmitter strong enough to reach your conscious state of awareness, but this is not a dream.
You are seeing what is actually occurring for the purpose of causality violation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298770</id>
	<title>Re:Future doesn't want to be discovered?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259603640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do not attribute to malice, what can be explained by stupidity... or something like that.</p><p>This is just 'Murphy', as in 'Murphy's Law', rearing his annoying head at in-opportune moments. This won't be the last fault, mishap, or failure we see with the LHC, so just sit back, relax, and enjoy the shenanigans. However, if you are an engineer at LHC, get to work triple checking EVERYTHING!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do not attribute to malice , what can be explained by stupidity... or something like that.This is just 'Murphy ' , as in 'Murphy 's Law ' , rearing his annoying head at in-opportune moments .
This wo n't be the last fault , mishap , or failure we see with the LHC , so just sit back , relax , and enjoy the shenanigans .
However , if you are an engineer at LHC , get to work triple checking EVERYTHING !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do not attribute to malice, what can be explained by stupidity... or something like that.This is just 'Murphy', as in 'Murphy's Law', rearing his annoying head at in-opportune moments.
This won't be the last fault, mishap, or failure we see with the LHC, so just sit back, relax, and enjoy the shenanigans.
However, if you are an engineer at LHC, get to work triple checking EVERYTHING!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300778</id>
	<title>Re:I hope it's true</title>
	<author>mea37</author>
	<datestamp>1259612640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pure science?  Perhaps pure science <i>fiction</i>.  Oh, sure, you could write a good short story around this "trying to build a machine to produce something abhorant to nature" premise, but that's about all it's good for.</p><p>If any device capable of causing particle collisions like those the LHC will produce were doomed to self-destruct in a mind-bending causality-ignoring time travel circus, then the Earth's atmosphere could not exist.  The theory's pretty much busted right there.</p><p>I suppose you can throw on another layer of pop-science gobbledygook to try and save it.  Maybe it's just impossible to have an instrument record such a collision.  After all, observing a phenomenon does affect it, and most people have a narrow enough understanding of what it means to observe a phenomenon that they'll probably buy the idea that upper-atmosphere collisions aren't routinely observed.  Well, again, that might be good for a story, but doesn't relate to what's really going on.</p><p>Maybe something else, then.  Maybe there's something distinct about what will happen in the LHC's operation that is causing disruptive effects in those events' past, and we just don't know what that difference is.  Of course, information propagating back in time is a pretty exotic claim; I'd hope something really hard to explain would have to have happened before we'd be motivated to look for a theory like that.  (Even if it were to happen at all, I can't say I believe it would manifest in such a bizzare macroscopic fashion.)</p><p>But the LHC setbacks <i>aren't</i> very hard to explain.  It's an insanely complicated machine; components fail.  Early computers with a fraction of the power of a modern digital watch were built from arrays of vacuum tubes - which are essentially like light bulbs, only more complex and correspondingly more delicate, being switched on and off over and over again.  MTBF would be measured maybe in hours.  The more you scale them up, the more components they have and the more complex they get, and the more frequently they break.  Likewise, the LHC has a lot of components, and many of them are failure-prone.</p><p>With computers, semiconductors gave us a more reliable way to do the same thing.  They didn't just make computers smaller; they also made it possible to make a modern CPU that doesn't fail before it has time to boot up.  Maybe we'll find better ways to do high-energy physics at some point; but for now, we've got what we've got.</p><p>Plus, after some early problems, now every little glitch is getting all kinds of disproportionate attention.  This outage was short - conveniently measurable in hours.  Think you can list all of the scientific installations that've undergone similar outages in the past week?  I bet not, because the media won't have bothered to mention them.</p><p>But ok - suppose we just keep trying to build colliders and they just keep failing in more and more ways, many of them unexpected.  Surely the probabilities pile up, and eventually it's worth looking for a theory, right?</p><p>Ok, then let's return to the question of whether this time-travel story is "science".  It is certainly no theory in the scientific sense  It is really just part of a hypothesis.  There's no clear way to test it.  It hasn't been incorporated into a model of the Higgs boson or of spacetime (such that we could test its impact on those models).</p><p>If pure science doesn't get better than this, then we're in trouble.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pure science ?
Perhaps pure science fiction .
Oh , sure , you could write a good short story around this " trying to build a machine to produce something abhorant to nature " premise , but that 's about all it 's good for.If any device capable of causing particle collisions like those the LHC will produce were doomed to self-destruct in a mind-bending causality-ignoring time travel circus , then the Earth 's atmosphere could not exist .
The theory 's pretty much busted right there.I suppose you can throw on another layer of pop-science gobbledygook to try and save it .
Maybe it 's just impossible to have an instrument record such a collision .
After all , observing a phenomenon does affect it , and most people have a narrow enough understanding of what it means to observe a phenomenon that they 'll probably buy the idea that upper-atmosphere collisions are n't routinely observed .
Well , again , that might be good for a story , but does n't relate to what 's really going on.Maybe something else , then .
Maybe there 's something distinct about what will happen in the LHC 's operation that is causing disruptive effects in those events ' past , and we just do n't know what that difference is .
Of course , information propagating back in time is a pretty exotic claim ; I 'd hope something really hard to explain would have to have happened before we 'd be motivated to look for a theory like that .
( Even if it were to happen at all , I ca n't say I believe it would manifest in such a bizzare macroscopic fashion .
) But the LHC setbacks are n't very hard to explain .
It 's an insanely complicated machine ; components fail .
Early computers with a fraction of the power of a modern digital watch were built from arrays of vacuum tubes - which are essentially like light bulbs , only more complex and correspondingly more delicate , being switched on and off over and over again .
MTBF would be measured maybe in hours .
The more you scale them up , the more components they have and the more complex they get , and the more frequently they break .
Likewise , the LHC has a lot of components , and many of them are failure-prone.With computers , semiconductors gave us a more reliable way to do the same thing .
They did n't just make computers smaller ; they also made it possible to make a modern CPU that does n't fail before it has time to boot up .
Maybe we 'll find better ways to do high-energy physics at some point ; but for now , we 've got what we 've got.Plus , after some early problems , now every little glitch is getting all kinds of disproportionate attention .
This outage was short - conveniently measurable in hours .
Think you can list all of the scientific installations that 've undergone similar outages in the past week ?
I bet not , because the media wo n't have bothered to mention them.But ok - suppose we just keep trying to build colliders and they just keep failing in more and more ways , many of them unexpected .
Surely the probabilities pile up , and eventually it 's worth looking for a theory , right ? Ok , then let 's return to the question of whether this time-travel story is " science " .
It is certainly no theory in the scientific sense It is really just part of a hypothesis .
There 's no clear way to test it .
It has n't been incorporated into a model of the Higgs boson or of spacetime ( such that we could test its impact on those models ) .If pure science does n't get better than this , then we 're in trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pure science?
Perhaps pure science fiction.
Oh, sure, you could write a good short story around this "trying to build a machine to produce something abhorant to nature" premise, but that's about all it's good for.If any device capable of causing particle collisions like those the LHC will produce were doomed to self-destruct in a mind-bending causality-ignoring time travel circus, then the Earth's atmosphere could not exist.
The theory's pretty much busted right there.I suppose you can throw on another layer of pop-science gobbledygook to try and save it.
Maybe it's just impossible to have an instrument record such a collision.
After all, observing a phenomenon does affect it, and most people have a narrow enough understanding of what it means to observe a phenomenon that they'll probably buy the idea that upper-atmosphere collisions aren't routinely observed.
Well, again, that might be good for a story, but doesn't relate to what's really going on.Maybe something else, then.
Maybe there's something distinct about what will happen in the LHC's operation that is causing disruptive effects in those events' past, and we just don't know what that difference is.
Of course, information propagating back in time is a pretty exotic claim; I'd hope something really hard to explain would have to have happened before we'd be motivated to look for a theory like that.
(Even if it were to happen at all, I can't say I believe it would manifest in such a bizzare macroscopic fashion.
)But the LHC setbacks aren't very hard to explain.
It's an insanely complicated machine; components fail.
Early computers with a fraction of the power of a modern digital watch were built from arrays of vacuum tubes - which are essentially like light bulbs, only more complex and correspondingly more delicate, being switched on and off over and over again.
MTBF would be measured maybe in hours.
The more you scale them up, the more components they have and the more complex they get, and the more frequently they break.
Likewise, the LHC has a lot of components, and many of them are failure-prone.With computers, semiconductors gave us a more reliable way to do the same thing.
They didn't just make computers smaller; they also made it possible to make a modern CPU that doesn't fail before it has time to boot up.
Maybe we'll find better ways to do high-energy physics at some point; but for now, we've got what we've got.Plus, after some early problems, now every little glitch is getting all kinds of disproportionate attention.
This outage was short - conveniently measurable in hours.
Think you can list all of the scientific installations that've undergone similar outages in the past week?
I bet not, because the media won't have bothered to mention them.But ok - suppose we just keep trying to build colliders and they just keep failing in more and more ways, many of them unexpected.
Surely the probabilities pile up, and eventually it's worth looking for a theory, right?Ok, then let's return to the question of whether this time-travel story is "science".
It is certainly no theory in the scientific sense  It is really just part of a hypothesis.
There's no clear way to test it.
It hasn't been incorporated into a model of the Higgs boson or of spacetime (such that we could test its impact on those models).If pure science doesn't get better than this, then we're in trouble.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298716</id>
	<title>Re:I'm writing this comment from 2017</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1259603400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lucky bastard. You got the glory assignment, while all *I* got was the mission to go back to 1967 and stop disco from happening.</p><p>Well, I'm off. Time for the brothers Gibb to have a little "Tragedy" at sea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lucky bastard .
You got the glory assignment , while all * I * got was the mission to go back to 1967 and stop disco from happening.Well , I 'm off .
Time for the brothers Gibb to have a little " Tragedy " at sea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lucky bastard.
You got the glory assignment, while all *I* got was the mission to go back to 1967 and stop disco from happening.Well, I'm off.
Time for the brothers Gibb to have a little "Tragedy" at sea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298488</id>
	<title>I know what it is</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1259602380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stupid black holes are now being emitted and going into power plants. Thank God that it was done in an area that believes in science. Here in the states, we would have a large group (republicans) screaming that it goes against God and we are not suppose to find out nature's secrets (unless it can be turned into a new WMD as laid out by the bible ) and a very small group of ppl screaming that it is destroying the environment (extremist greenies).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stupid black holes are now being emitted and going into power plants .
Thank God that it was done in an area that believes in science .
Here in the states , we would have a large group ( republicans ) screaming that it goes against God and we are not suppose to find out nature 's secrets ( unless it can be turned into a new WMD as laid out by the bible ) and a very small group of ppl screaming that it is destroying the environment ( extremist greenies ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stupid black holes are now being emitted and going into power plants.
Thank God that it was done in an area that believes in science.
Here in the states, we would have a large group (republicans) screaming that it goes against God and we are not suppose to find out nature's secrets (unless it can be turned into a new WMD as laid out by the bible ) and a very small group of ppl screaming that it is destroying the environment (extremist greenies).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298886</id>
	<title>Re:Bagel</title>
	<author>hanshotfirst</author>
	<datestamp>1259604120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext> Oracle Licensing, is that you?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oracle Licensing , is that you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Oracle Licensing, is that you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30303494</id>
	<title>Re:Sabotage?</title>
	<author>mdielmann</author>
	<datestamp>1259578620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>is it possible someone has been sabotaging it from the inside or even outside?</p></div><p>Not until after they've collected enough antimatter to make an explosion reminiscent of the old pictures of Creation Day One.<br>Hey, if I have to suffer through the scars from that movie, so do you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>is it possible someone has been sabotaging it from the inside or even outside ? Not until after they 've collected enough antimatter to make an explosion reminiscent of the old pictures of Creation Day One.Hey , if I have to suffer through the scars from that movie , so do you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is it possible someone has been sabotaging it from the inside or even outside?Not until after they've collected enough antimatter to make an explosion reminiscent of the old pictures of Creation Day One.Hey, if I have to suffer through the scars from that movie, so do you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30308086</id>
	<title>Re:Is this a good thing to happen now?</title>
	<author>Werthless5</author>
	<datestamp>1259611080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are countless backup generators and numerous failsafes that will safely redirect the beam into one of the many beam dumps, which are basically big blocks of concrete.</p><p>The worst that can happen: all of the failsafes fail, backup generators fail, and the LHC damages itself, requiring several years of repairs.  That's the biggest disaster that the LHC could possibly ever produce.  Keep in mind, it's already 100 meters underground, a length through which the particle beam couldn't penetrate even if it somehow scattered straight upward.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are countless backup generators and numerous failsafes that will safely redirect the beam into one of the many beam dumps , which are basically big blocks of concrete.The worst that can happen : all of the failsafes fail , backup generators fail , and the LHC damages itself , requiring several years of repairs .
That 's the biggest disaster that the LHC could possibly ever produce .
Keep in mind , it 's already 100 meters underground , a length through which the particle beam could n't penetrate even if it somehow scattered straight upward .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are countless backup generators and numerous failsafes that will safely redirect the beam into one of the many beam dumps, which are basically big blocks of concrete.The worst that can happen: all of the failsafes fail, backup generators fail, and the LHC damages itself, requiring several years of repairs.
That's the biggest disaster that the LHC could possibly ever produce.
Keep in mind, it's already 100 meters underground, a length through which the particle beam couldn't penetrate even if it somehow scattered straight upward.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298220</id>
	<title>Who really built this thing?  eMachines?</title>
	<author>King\_TJ</author>
	<datestamp>1259601060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "uptime" on this collider is worse than an application server running on Windows 3.0!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " uptime " on this collider is worse than an application server running on Windows 3.0 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "uptime" on this collider is worse than an application server running on Windows 3.0!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298322</id>
	<title>Dang those future guys</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interfering with our research. I say we go and kick thei</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interfering with our research .
I say we go and kick thei</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interfering with our research.
I say we go and kick thei</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30303938</id>
	<title>Let me guess</title>
	<author>qmaqdk</author>
	<datestamp>1259580060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was a croissant this time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was a croissant this time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was a croissant this time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30305590</id>
	<title>Jews are sabotaging LHC!</title>
	<author>zmollusc</author>
	<datestamp>1259586540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously the LHC's purpose is to open a portal through spacetime so that Hitlar can be picked up, cloned a billion times then the clone army sent back to zerg-rush Moscow. Wake up, people, the truth is right in front of you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously the LHC 's purpose is to open a portal through spacetime so that Hitlar can be picked up , cloned a billion times then the clone army sent back to zerg-rush Moscow .
Wake up , people , the truth is right in front of you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously the LHC's purpose is to open a portal through spacetime so that Hitlar can be picked up, cloned a billion times then the clone army sent back to zerg-rush Moscow.
Wake up, people, the truth is right in front of you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298562</id>
	<title>Re:I'm writing this comment from 2017</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1259602740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I for one welcome our Earth-protecting overlords from the future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome our Earth-protecting overlords from the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome our Earth-protecting overlords from the future.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30302306</id>
	<title>Re:Sabotage?</title>
	<author>Jainith</author>
	<datestamp>1259574960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>back in 10th grade I had an assignment to do a book report with associated musical accompaniment. I wasn't into music at the time so I consulted with a friend, I ended up using 'Sabotage' to go with Tom Clancy's Op-Center (the first one).</p><p>It is really pretty amazing how well the song lines up with the events in the book, the comparisons I made would hardly qualify as metaphors...</p><p>It was quite surprising to my classmates as I didn't appear to be the Beastie Boys type, and everyone else's presentation was quite lame...the teacher liked it...my parents, not so much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>back in 10th grade I had an assignment to do a book report with associated musical accompaniment .
I was n't into music at the time so I consulted with a friend , I ended up using 'Sabotage ' to go with Tom Clancy 's Op-Center ( the first one ) .It is really pretty amazing how well the song lines up with the events in the book , the comparisons I made would hardly qualify as metaphors...It was quite surprising to my classmates as I did n't appear to be the Beastie Boys type , and everyone else 's presentation was quite lame...the teacher liked it...my parents , not so much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>back in 10th grade I had an assignment to do a book report with associated musical accompaniment.
I wasn't into music at the time so I consulted with a friend, I ended up using 'Sabotage' to go with Tom Clancy's Op-Center (the first one).It is really pretty amazing how well the song lines up with the events in the book, the comparisons I made would hardly qualify as metaphors...It was quite surprising to my classmates as I didn't appear to be the Beastie Boys type, and everyone else's presentation was quite lame...the teacher liked it...my parents, not so much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30301208</id>
	<title>Fake news</title>
	<author>Lcf34</author>
	<datestamp>1259614560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I live nearby and there was no powedhcpcd: eth0: carrier lost</htmltext>
<tokenext>I live nearby and there was no powedhcpcd : eth0 : carrier lost</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live nearby and there was no powedhcpcd: eth0: carrier lost</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300272</id>
	<title>Re:The sign of the failure of particle physics</title>
	<author>Bigjeff5</author>
	<datestamp>1259610240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What do you want, battery power? They'd need a building full of them and it is only going to last so long, diesel power is energy dense and is about as efficient a way of producing power as we have available.  I am of course exlcuding nuclear power, and if you think we should be using nuclear for the backup power of one facility, well you're a dumbass and the rest of my post is wasted on you.</p><p>The LHC uses about 400mwh of electricity every day when all powered up.  That's a ton of energy, but it is not by any means the most a facility has ever used.  A wind farm of that size would need acres of land to run on, and would -not- be suitable for backup power due to the variable nature of wind power.  Same goes for solar.  Backup power needs to be flip-a-switch-and-it-works reliable.  With diesels they can truck in gas if they start to run low, but how do you truck in wind or sunlight?</p><p>In fact, anybody who has lived off the grid knows that diesel is usually the only practical option.  If the wind isn't right and the sunlight isn't right and you don't happen to be sitting on top of a magma chamber close to the surface, the only options are IC engines, and diesel is the king.</p><p>Lastly, if you think the diesel generators we use today use the same technology (aside from the basic internal combustion principles) as engines 100 years ago did, you're an idiot, and I mean that in the most traditional sense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What do you want , battery power ?
They 'd need a building full of them and it is only going to last so long , diesel power is energy dense and is about as efficient a way of producing power as we have available .
I am of course exlcuding nuclear power , and if you think we should be using nuclear for the backup power of one facility , well you 're a dumbass and the rest of my post is wasted on you.The LHC uses about 400mwh of electricity every day when all powered up .
That 's a ton of energy , but it is not by any means the most a facility has ever used .
A wind farm of that size would need acres of land to run on , and would -not- be suitable for backup power due to the variable nature of wind power .
Same goes for solar .
Backup power needs to be flip-a-switch-and-it-works reliable .
With diesels they can truck in gas if they start to run low , but how do you truck in wind or sunlight ? In fact , anybody who has lived off the grid knows that diesel is usually the only practical option .
If the wind is n't right and the sunlight is n't right and you do n't happen to be sitting on top of a magma chamber close to the surface , the only options are IC engines , and diesel is the king.Lastly , if you think the diesel generators we use today use the same technology ( aside from the basic internal combustion principles ) as engines 100 years ago did , you 're an idiot , and I mean that in the most traditional sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do you want, battery power?
They'd need a building full of them and it is only going to last so long, diesel power is energy dense and is about as efficient a way of producing power as we have available.
I am of course exlcuding nuclear power, and if you think we should be using nuclear for the backup power of one facility, well you're a dumbass and the rest of my post is wasted on you.The LHC uses about 400mwh of electricity every day when all powered up.
That's a ton of energy, but it is not by any means the most a facility has ever used.
A wind farm of that size would need acres of land to run on, and would -not- be suitable for backup power due to the variable nature of wind power.
Same goes for solar.
Backup power needs to be flip-a-switch-and-it-works reliable.
With diesels they can truck in gas if they start to run low, but how do you truck in wind or sunlight?In fact, anybody who has lived off the grid knows that diesel is usually the only practical option.
If the wind isn't right and the sunlight isn't right and you don't happen to be sitting on top of a magma chamber close to the surface, the only options are IC engines, and diesel is the king.Lastly, if you think the diesel generators we use today use the same technology (aside from the basic internal combustion principles) as engines 100 years ago did, you're an idiot, and I mean that in the most traditional sense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299656</id>
	<title>Re:Large Hardon Collider *ouch*</title>
	<author>neoform</author>
	<datestamp>1259607300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've been boning up on my HL2 training lately.

Damn you Nova Prospect, I hate the part where you need to fend off attacks with turrets.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been boning up on my HL2 training lately .
Damn you Nova Prospect , I hate the part where you need to fend off attacks with turrets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been boning up on my HL2 training lately.
Damn you Nova Prospect, I hate the part where you need to fend off attacks with turrets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30348180</id>
	<title>Re:Huh?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260110400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which of the half a dozen or so plug types used on this <strong>CONTINENT</strong> do you mean?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which of the half a dozen or so plug types used on this CONTINENT do you mean ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which of the half a dozen or so plug types used on this CONTINENT do you mean?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298278</id>
	<title>No worries</title>
	<author>wumpus188</author>
	<datestamp>1259601360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here is the <a href="http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html" title="cyriak.co.uk" rel="nofollow">cached version</a> [cyriak.co.uk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is the cached version [ cyriak.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is the cached version [cyriak.co.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298856</id>
	<title>Is this news anby more?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259604000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The LHC is on. It's off. It's on and off and on and off...maybe it's Schrodinger's LHC.</p><p>OMG a scientist farted and the LHC  died, again.</p><p>Tell me when it actually does something interesting, like, say, particle collision.</p><p>$6 billion and it's accomplished precisely nothing but break the record for biggest waste of energy and the most fragile machine ever built.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The LHC is on .
It 's off .
It 's on and off and on and off...maybe it 's Schrodinger 's LHC.OMG a scientist farted and the LHC died , again.Tell me when it actually does something interesting , like , say , particle collision. $ 6 billion and it 's accomplished precisely nothing but break the record for biggest waste of energy and the most fragile machine ever built .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The LHC is on.
It's off.
It's on and off and on and off...maybe it's Schrodinger's LHC.OMG a scientist farted and the LHC  died, again.Tell me when it actually does something interesting, like, say, particle collision.$6 billion and it's accomplished precisely nothing but break the record for biggest waste of energy and the most fragile machine ever built.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298354</id>
	<title>LHC Knocked Out By Another Power Failure</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is a frantic search on to find out who was microwaving popcorn in the break room when this occurred.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a frantic search on to find out who was microwaving popcorn in the break room when this occurred .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a frantic search on to find out who was microwaving popcorn in the break room when this occurred.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298844</id>
	<title>Re:Huh?</title>
	<author>Ellis D. Tripp</author>
	<datestamp>1259603940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ever heard of Joseph Lucas, Prince of Darkness?</p><p>That's why the Brits drink warm beer--Lucas makes the refrigerators!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ever heard of Joseph Lucas , Prince of Darkness ? That 's why the Brits drink warm beer--Lucas makes the refrigerators !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ever heard of Joseph Lucas, Prince of Darkness?That's why the Brits drink warm beer--Lucas makes the refrigerators!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298924</id>
	<title>Re:I'm writing this comment from 2017</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259604240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who? Oh wait, that means it worked, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who ?
Oh wait , that means it worked , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who?
Oh wait, that means it worked, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300120</id>
	<title>Re:Future doesn't want to be discovered?</title>
	<author>chord.wav</author>
	<datestamp>1259609460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Correction: Church doesn't want its dogma to be debunked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Correction : Church does n't want its dogma to be debunked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correction: Church doesn't want its dogma to be debunked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298378</id>
	<title>The Future</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and stay the hell off Europa (in other words, Get off my lawn).</htmltext>
<tokenext>and stay the hell off Europa ( in other words , Get off my lawn ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and stay the hell off Europa (in other words, Get off my lawn).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30302338</id>
	<title>Re:Sabotage?</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1259575080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>is it possible someone has been sabotaging it from the inside or even outside?</i></p><p><i>If they are, they are the worst saboteurs ever.  This is about the equivalent of sabotaging the NSA's wiretapping by pulling the fire alarm.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is it possible someone has been sabotaging it from the inside or even outside ? If they are , they are the worst saboteurs ever .
This is about the equivalent of sabotaging the NSA 's wiretapping by pulling the fire alarm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is it possible someone has been sabotaging it from the inside or even outside?If they are, they are the worst saboteurs ever.
This is about the equivalent of sabotaging the NSA's wiretapping by pulling the fire alarm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30305922</id>
	<title>Re:video of the event</title>
	<author>Roman Coder</author>
	<datestamp>1259588580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, I just saw this for the first time, and even laughed.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/shrug</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I just saw this for the first time , and even laughed .
/shrug</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I just saw this for the first time, and even laughed.
/shrug</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298616</id>
	<title>Hoverboards don't work on water(unrelated)</title>
	<author>orsty3001</author>
	<datestamp>1259602980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hope there's a Scottish man screaming "WE NEED MORE POWER CAPTAIN!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope there 's a Scottish man screaming " WE NEED MORE POWER CAPTAIN !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope there's a Scottish man screaming "WE NEED MORE POWER CAPTAIN!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299280</id>
	<title>Re:Take it easy people ...</title>
	<author>Thoughts from Englan</author>
	<datestamp>1259605620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You do know this is a european project don't you? It didn't cost any US Dollars, Euros, Pounds and of course all the previous european currencies involved in the building of the LEP which used to live in the same tunnel but not $<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:o)</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do know this is a european project do n't you ?
It did n't cost any US Dollars , Euros , Pounds and of course all the previous european currencies involved in the building of the LEP which used to live in the same tunnel but not $ : o )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do know this is a european project don't you?
It didn't cost any US Dollars, Euros, Pounds and of course all the previous european currencies involved in the building of the LEP which used to live in the same tunnel but not $ :o)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30301292</id>
	<title>Bruce Almighty</title>
	<author>svtdragon</author>
	<datestamp>1259571660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&lt;snark&gt;
<br> <br>
Or, it's a SIGN!
<br> <br>
&lt;/snark&gt;
<br> <br>
In all seriousness though, I'm a Goddamn Atheist, and *still* this whole thing reminds me of the scene in Bruce Almighty where he's asking God "please send me a sign" as he follows a construction truck full of "STOP" "BRIDGE OUT AHEAD" signs, and winds up crashing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , it 's a SIGN !
In all seriousness though , I 'm a Goddamn Atheist , and * still * this whole thing reminds me of the scene in Bruce Almighty where he 's asking God " please send me a sign " as he follows a construction truck full of " STOP " " BRIDGE OUT AHEAD " signs , and winds up crashing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
 
Or, it's a SIGN!
In all seriousness though, I'm a Goddamn Atheist, and *still* this whole thing reminds me of the scene in Bruce Almighty where he's asking God "please send me a sign" as he follows a construction truck full of "STOP" "BRIDGE OUT AHEAD" signs, and winds up crashing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298718</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30302406
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30348256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30304484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30308086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30302336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30306274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30348202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30348180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30302306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30348446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30304868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30306996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299902
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30301298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30303956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30302382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30301114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30307068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30309422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30305922
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30301248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30301292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30303702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299354
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30305548
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30304702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30303494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30305780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30308596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_1528211_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30302338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298560
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30301298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299492
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30301248
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30306274
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298532
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298992
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298674
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30306532
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30305780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299448
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30303956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300172
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300778
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30308086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30348446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30305548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30306996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299620
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300174
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30302338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30303494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30302306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30348202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30301292
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298496
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299902
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299426
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299614
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298856
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298180
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30302382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300380
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298624
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298594
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299280
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298828
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30302336
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30303702
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299690
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30304868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300202
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298806
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298742
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298232
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298904
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30308596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30348180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300128
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30301114
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30307068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30302406
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298592
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299782
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298822
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30304484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298266
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30309422
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298808
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298962
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298882
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299024
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30304702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298716
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298950
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299640
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298220
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298204
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300020
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30305922
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299142
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298236
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30348256
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30300246
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30299268
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298354
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_1528211.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_1528211.30298834
</commentlist>
</conversation>
