<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_02_0130216</id>
	<title>Somali Pirates Open Up a "Stock Exchange"</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1259771340000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>reginaldo writes to clue us that <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/wtUSInvestingNews/idUSTRE5B01Z920091201?sp=true">pirates in Somalia have opened up a cooperative</a> in Haradheere, where investors can pay money or guns to help their favorite pirate crew for a share of the piracy profits. <i>"'Four months ago, during the monsoon rains, we decided to set up this stock exchange. We started with 15 "maritime companies" and now we are hosting 72. Ten of them have so far been successful at hijacking,' Mohammed [a wealthy former pirate who took a Reuters reporter to the facility] said. ... Piracy investor Sahra Ibrahim, a 22-year-old divorcee, was lined up with others waiting for her cut of a ransom pay-out after one of the gangs freed a Spanish tuna fishing vessel. 'I am waiting for my share after I contributed a rocket-propelled grenade for the operation,' she said, adding that she got the weapon from her ex-husband in alimony. 'I am really happy and lucky. I have made $75,000 in only 38 days since I joined the "company."'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>reginaldo writes to clue us that pirates in Somalia have opened up a cooperative in Haradheere , where investors can pay money or guns to help their favorite pirate crew for a share of the piracy profits .
" 'Four months ago , during the monsoon rains , we decided to set up this stock exchange .
We started with 15 " maritime companies " and now we are hosting 72 .
Ten of them have so far been successful at hijacking, ' Mohammed [ a wealthy former pirate who took a Reuters reporter to the facility ] said .
... Piracy investor Sahra Ibrahim , a 22-year-old divorcee , was lined up with others waiting for her cut of a ransom pay-out after one of the gangs freed a Spanish tuna fishing vessel .
'I am waiting for my share after I contributed a rocket-propelled grenade for the operation, ' she said , adding that she got the weapon from her ex-husband in alimony .
'I am really happy and lucky .
I have made $ 75,000 in only 38 days since I joined the " company .
" ' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>reginaldo writes to clue us that pirates in Somalia have opened up a cooperative in Haradheere, where investors can pay money or guns to help their favorite pirate crew for a share of the piracy profits.
"'Four months ago, during the monsoon rains, we decided to set up this stock exchange.
We started with 15 "maritime companies" and now we are hosting 72.
Ten of them have so far been successful at hijacking,' Mohammed [a wealthy former pirate who took a Reuters reporter to the facility] said.
... Piracy investor Sahra Ibrahim, a 22-year-old divorcee, was lined up with others waiting for her cut of a ransom pay-out after one of the gangs freed a Spanish tuna fishing vessel.
'I am waiting for my share after I contributed a rocket-propelled grenade for the operation,' she said, adding that she got the weapon from her ex-husband in alimony.
'I am really happy and lucky.
I have made $75,000 in only 38 days since I joined the "company.
"'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295262</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259579100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Perhaps we can send some folks from the BSA and RIAA over there to educate them about <i>actual, real piracy</i>.</p></div><p>When I first read that, I thought you were trying to educate the Somalis...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps we can send some folks from the BSA and RIAA over there to educate them about actual , real piracy.When I first read that , I thought you were trying to educate the Somalis.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps we can send some folks from the BSA and RIAA over there to educate them about actual, real piracy.When I first read that, I thought you were trying to educate the Somalis...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30321940</id>
	<title>Re:Why not?</title>
	<author>bar-agent</author>
	<datestamp>1259920500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Somalia doesn't really have a functional government.<br>Somali pirates are operating in a power vaccuum and will go away once it gets filled.</p></div></blockquote><p>I think it's more likely that the pirates will <i>become</i> the functional government. They seem to be in a good position to do so. They've got manpower, weapons, cash, people are flocking to their banners, and they're getting very very organized.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somalia does n't really have a functional government.Somali pirates are operating in a power vaccuum and will go away once it gets filled.I think it 's more likely that the pirates will become the functional government .
They seem to be in a good position to do so .
They 've got manpower , weapons , cash , people are flocking to their banners , and they 're getting very very organized .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somalia doesn't really have a functional government.Somali pirates are operating in a power vaccuum and will go away once it gets filled.I think it's more likely that the pirates will become the functional government.
They seem to be in a good position to do so.
They've got manpower, weapons, cash, people are flocking to their banners, and they're getting very very organized.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294888</id>
	<title>Darkside of Humanities</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259574060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Living in a devastating country like Somali, facing a difficult choice like starvation or detain a ship ask for ransom on daily bases. I'm keep thinking the ridiculous things as this turns to abnormal reasonable fact. The catch which behind those who gain from the pirate share is the crew member who been kidnapped facing live or death everyday. A genuine selfish thought.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Living in a devastating country like Somali , facing a difficult choice like starvation or detain a ship ask for ransom on daily bases .
I 'm keep thinking the ridiculous things as this turns to abnormal reasonable fact .
The catch which behind those who gain from the pirate share is the crew member who been kidnapped facing live or death everyday .
A genuine selfish thought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Living in a devastating country like Somali, facing a difficult choice like starvation or detain a ship ask for ransom on daily bases.
I'm keep thinking the ridiculous things as this turns to abnormal reasonable fact.
The catch which behind those who gain from the pirate share is the crew member who been kidnapped facing live or death everyday.
A genuine selfish thought.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294748</id>
	<title>Drones</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1259571840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We need to fly a couple of VERY HIGH FLYING DRONES loaded with weapons. This is so stupid. Far too many countries have paid so these uneducated guys have found an easy way to make money.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We need to fly a couple of VERY HIGH FLYING DRONES loaded with weapons .
This is so stupid .
Far too many countries have paid so these uneducated guys have found an easy way to make money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We need to fly a couple of VERY HIGH FLYING DRONES loaded with weapons.
This is so stupid.
Far too many countries have paid so these uneducated guys have found an easy way to make money.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295286</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>damburger</author>
	<datestamp>1259579280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course they follow rules; once they get on land they are part of a community and they rely on that community to offer them protection from those who would hunt them down. In return, they bring an awful lot of money into that community.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course they follow rules ; once they get on land they are part of a community and they rely on that community to offer them protection from those who would hunt them down .
In return , they bring an awful lot of money into that community .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course they follow rules; once they get on land they are part of a community and they rely on that community to offer them protection from those who would hunt them down.
In return, they bring an awful lot of money into that community.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295750</id>
	<title>kitsunewarlock</title>
	<author>kitsunewarlock</author>
	<datestamp>1259584980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stay tuned for the Davy Jones report.
<br> <br>
Ba dum psh!  I'll be here all week, don't forget to tip your waitress.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stay tuned for the Davy Jones report .
Ba dum psh !
I 'll be here all week , do n't forget to tip your waitress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stay tuned for the Davy Jones report.
Ba dum psh!
I'll be here all week, don't forget to tip your waitress.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294020</id>
	<title>Re:just bomb them</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259693280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is the best way <em>for society</em>.  But in each individual case it's better to pay the ransom.  Furthermore, it's a lot easier to measure "hostages successfully ransomed" than "pirate attacks that never occurred."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is the best way for society .
But in each individual case it 's better to pay the ransom .
Furthermore , it 's a lot easier to measure " hostages successfully ransomed " than " pirate attacks that never occurred .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is the best way for society.
But in each individual case it's better to pay the ransom.
Furthermore, it's a lot easier to measure "hostages successfully ransomed" than "pirate attacks that never occurred.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297202</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259596320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heh. For a second I thought you mean the BSA and RIAA people will educate the Somali about real piracy...<br>Come to think of it the sentence would work even better that way... Sarcasm rules.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heh .
For a second I thought you mean the BSA and RIAA people will educate the Somali about real piracy...Come to think of it the sentence would work even better that way... Sarcasm rules .
: -D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heh.
For a second I thought you mean the BSA and RIAA people will educate the Somali about real piracy...Come to think of it the sentence would work even better that way... Sarcasm rules.
:-D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293514</id>
	<title>regulation</title>
	<author>vxice</author>
	<datestamp>1259689200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>what happens when you have a totally free economy.  On the other hand with a completely regulated economy you end stifling  entrepreneurship.   And with a poorly regulated economy people screw up because they think if what they were doing was wrong there would be rules against it.  Lesson is that we need a properly regulated economy, but that is where my insight ends and I revert to criticizing what other people doing I can't be wrong.</htmltext>
<tokenext>what happens when you have a totally free economy .
On the other hand with a completely regulated economy you end stifling entrepreneurship .
And with a poorly regulated economy people screw up because they think if what they were doing was wrong there would be rules against it .
Lesson is that we need a properly regulated economy , but that is where my insight ends and I revert to criticizing what other people doing I ca n't be wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what happens when you have a totally free economy.
On the other hand with a completely regulated economy you end stifling  entrepreneurship.
And with a poorly regulated economy people screw up because they think if what they were doing was wrong there would be rules against it.
Lesson is that we need a properly regulated economy, but that is where my insight ends and I revert to criticizing what other people doing I can't be wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295432</id>
	<title>Becasue people learn from history.</title>
	<author>jotaeleemeese</author>
	<datestamp>1259580840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And most are not despicable individuals suggesting indiscriminate killing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And most are not despicable individuals suggesting indiscriminate killing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And most are not despicable individuals suggesting indiscriminate killing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293500</id>
	<title>Imagine being a young Somalian, and choose</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259689140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>a) be poor and out of work<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... watching the rich pirates having a good life (who are sharing a little of their money to the locals)<br>a) die on a overfilled boat to Europe / get sent back if you manage to get there.<br>c) become a pirate</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a ) be poor and out of work ... watching the rich pirates having a good life ( who are sharing a little of their money to the locals ) a ) die on a overfilled boat to Europe / get sent back if you manage to get there.c ) become a pirate</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a) be poor and out of work ... watching the rich pirates having a good life (who are sharing a little of their money to the locals)a) die on a overfilled boat to Europe / get sent back if you manage to get there.c) become a pirate</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297212</id>
	<title>Re:Why not?</title>
	<author>amplt1337</author>
	<datestamp>1259596380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well... from what you're saying, it's not a matter of "how long you've been around," it's a matter of whether or not the Dutch like you.</p><p>Either body sounds like it'd violate the "sovereign monopoly on the legitimate use of force" constraint of a modern government.  The fact that the DEIC (which I'm assuming was operating like the BritishEIC) had European permission to go dick around in non-European countries with blatant disregard for their local governments doesn't seem very convincing to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well... from what you 're saying , it 's not a matter of " how long you 've been around , " it 's a matter of whether or not the Dutch like you.Either body sounds like it 'd violate the " sovereign monopoly on the legitimate use of force " constraint of a modern government .
The fact that the DEIC ( which I 'm assuming was operating like the BritishEIC ) had European permission to go dick around in non-European countries with blatant disregard for their local governments does n't seem very convincing to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well... from what you're saying, it's not a matter of "how long you've been around," it's a matter of whether or not the Dutch like you.Either body sounds like it'd violate the "sovereign monopoly on the legitimate use of force" constraint of a modern government.
The fact that the DEIC (which I'm assuming was operating like the BritishEIC) had European permission to go dick around in non-European countries with blatant disregard for their local governments doesn't seem very convincing to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295728</id>
	<title>Re:Why is the world so soft on pirates?</title>
	<author>Eunuchswear</author>
	<datestamp>1259584800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>hy don't other nations' militaries take a similar hard-line approach?</p></div></blockquote><p>They do.  Maybe you'd better check your news sources.</p><p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7994201.stm" title="bbc.co.uk">BBC NEWS | Special Reports | Frenchman dies in Somalia rescue 11 Apr 2009</a> [bbc.co.uk]<br><a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKLF45205620090415" title="reuters.com">French frigate seizes Somali pirates | World | Reuters 15 Apr 2009</a> [reuters.com]<br><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/10/13/france.pirates/index.html" title="cnn.com">French military fends off Somalia pirate attack - CNN.com 13 Oct 2009 </a> [cnn.com]<br><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,574946,00.html" title="foxnews.com">French Navy Captures 12 Pirates Off Somalia - International News<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... 13 Nov 2009</a> [foxnews.com] </p><blockquote><div><p>Heck, a single aircraft carrier in the region, launching planes to fly patrols which would respond to distress calls, would go a long way to securing the region.</p></div></blockquote><p>Wah?  What you going to do, bomb the ship the pirates have captured?  This is a job for marines in helicopters and small boats, not flyboys.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>hy do n't other nations ' militaries take a similar hard-line approach ? They do .
Maybe you 'd better check your news sources.BBC NEWS | Special Reports | Frenchman dies in Somalia rescue 11 Apr 2009 [ bbc.co.uk ] French frigate seizes Somali pirates | World | Reuters 15 Apr 2009 [ reuters.com ] French military fends off Somalia pirate attack - CNN.com 13 Oct 2009 [ cnn.com ] French Navy Captures 12 Pirates Off Somalia - International News ... 13 Nov 2009 [ foxnews.com ] Heck , a single aircraft carrier in the region , launching planes to fly patrols which would respond to distress calls , would go a long way to securing the region.Wah ?
What you going to do , bomb the ship the pirates have captured ?
This is a job for marines in helicopters and small boats , not flyboys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hy don't other nations' militaries take a similar hard-line approach?They do.
Maybe you'd better check your news sources.BBC NEWS | Special Reports | Frenchman dies in Somalia rescue 11 Apr 2009 [bbc.co.uk]French frigate seizes Somali pirates | World | Reuters 15 Apr 2009 [reuters.com]French military fends off Somalia pirate attack - CNN.com 13 Oct 2009  [cnn.com]French Navy Captures 12 Pirates Off Somalia - International News ... 13 Nov 2009 [foxnews.com] Heck, a single aircraft carrier in the region, launching planes to fly patrols which would respond to distress calls, would go a long way to securing the region.Wah?
What you going to do, bomb the ship the pirates have captured?
This is a job for marines in helicopters and small boats, not flyboys.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30298680</id>
	<title>Re:Why not?</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1259603220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Legalized murder is still murder.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Legalized murder is still murder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Legalized murder is still murder.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538</id>
	<title>Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes form</title>
	<author>Nadaka</author>
	<datestamp>1259689380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is unregulated laissez faire capitalism at its finest. I'm so proud, little Somolia is growing up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is unregulated laissez faire capitalism at its finest .
I 'm so proud , little Somolia is growing up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is unregulated laissez faire capitalism at its finest.
I'm so proud, little Somolia is growing up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294470</id>
	<title>There can only be one answer to this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259611620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bring back slavery. Not chattel slavery, but indentured servitude for captured pirates, and maybe captured piracy investors, until they work off the value of the money extorted and damage done. The ship owners could set up  a corporation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bring back slavery .
Not chattel slavery , but indentured servitude for captured pirates , and maybe captured piracy investors , until they work off the value of the money extorted and damage done .
The ship owners could set up a corporation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bring back slavery.
Not chattel slavery, but indentured servitude for captured pirates, and maybe captured piracy investors, until they work off the value of the money extorted and damage done.
The ship owners could set up  a corporation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293672</id>
	<title>Anarcho-capitalism?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259690400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ahh, what a perfect example of good old free market capitalism at work. Somalia: its a libertarian dream come true!  How perfect that my captcha for this post is "markets."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahh , what a perfect example of good old free market capitalism at work .
Somalia : its a libertarian dream come true !
How perfect that my captcha for this post is " markets .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahh, what a perfect example of good old free market capitalism at work.
Somalia: its a libertarian dream come true!
How perfect that my captcha for this post is "markets.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293548</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259689440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well it all depends on whether the Somali government will bail out the pirates. They'd better... I've got a CDO riding on the pirates not defaulting on this lady.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well it all depends on whether the Somali government will bail out the pirates .
They 'd better... I 've got a CDO riding on the pirates not defaulting on this lady .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well it all depends on whether the Somali government will bail out the pirates.
They'd better... I've got a CDO riding on the pirates not defaulting on this lady.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294332</id>
	<title>Weapons on boats</title>
	<author>davaguco</author>
	<datestamp>1259696700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In Spain, and in many other the european countries, they are now including armed personnel on fishing boats. Some countries allow military soldiers to go with them, some others just allow private security with heavy weapons.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Spain , and in many other the european countries , they are now including armed personnel on fishing boats .
Some countries allow military soldiers to go with them , some others just allow private security with heavy weapons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Spain, and in many other the european countries, they are now including armed personnel on fishing boats.
Some countries allow military soldiers to go with them, some others just allow private security with heavy weapons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294232</id>
	<title>Re:just bomb them</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1259695680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The shipping companies(not to mention the boys at <a href="http://www.lloyds.com/" title="lloyds.com">Lloyd's</a> [lloyds.com]) would kick up a hell of a fuss if that plan were adopted.<br> <br>

The shippers aren't there to achieve foreign policy objectives, satisfy Law and Order enthusiasts, or even coddle bleeding hearts. They are there to make money by shipping stuff. The reason that they aren't bothering to do all that much about piracy is that, at least at present, it is cheaper to just suck it up, pay the occasional ransom, and carry on with business than it would be to do anything terribly aggressive.<br> <br>

A plan that involves <i>blowing up</i> entire ships(not cheap to replace) and their cargoes(also not cheap, and you'd better believe that whoever paid the shipper to have that stuff shipped would be pissed if it got lost) would be, from the shippers' perspective, vastly more expensive than just ignoring the problem.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The shipping companies ( not to mention the boys at Lloyd 's [ lloyds.com ] ) would kick up a hell of a fuss if that plan were adopted .
The shippers are n't there to achieve foreign policy objectives , satisfy Law and Order enthusiasts , or even coddle bleeding hearts .
They are there to make money by shipping stuff .
The reason that they are n't bothering to do all that much about piracy is that , at least at present , it is cheaper to just suck it up , pay the occasional ransom , and carry on with business than it would be to do anything terribly aggressive .
A plan that involves blowing up entire ships ( not cheap to replace ) and their cargoes ( also not cheap , and you 'd better believe that whoever paid the shipper to have that stuff shipped would be pissed if it got lost ) would be , from the shippers ' perspective , vastly more expensive than just ignoring the problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The shipping companies(not to mention the boys at Lloyd's [lloyds.com]) would kick up a hell of a fuss if that plan were adopted.
The shippers aren't there to achieve foreign policy objectives, satisfy Law and Order enthusiasts, or even coddle bleeding hearts.
They are there to make money by shipping stuff.
The reason that they aren't bothering to do all that much about piracy is that, at least at present, it is cheaper to just suck it up, pay the occasional ransom, and carry on with business than it would be to do anything terribly aggressive.
A plan that involves blowing up entire ships(not cheap to replace) and their cargoes(also not cheap, and you'd better believe that whoever paid the shipper to have that stuff shipped would be pissed if it got lost) would be, from the shippers' perspective, vastly more expensive than just ignoring the problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293456</id>
	<title>Paging Bernie Madoff Clients...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259688780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have we got a great deal for you!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have we got a great deal for you !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have we got a great deal for you!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30309320</id>
	<title>look at the prob</title>
	<author>ticktickboom</author>
	<datestamp>1259848620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it is simply not 'there are pirates, and we all pay them off'.  maybe we should ask, WHY there are doing what they do?  why is the country so desolate?  it wouldn't be from the mega corps going t here, paying little of nothing for every last piece of resource, then leaving.  no, it couldn't be there, pirates are bad....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it is simply not 'there are pirates , and we all pay them off' .
maybe we should ask , WHY there are doing what they do ?
why is the country so desolate ?
it would n't be from the mega corps going t here , paying little of nothing for every last piece of resource , then leaving .
no , it could n't be there , pirates are bad... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it is simply not 'there are pirates, and we all pay them off'.
maybe we should ask, WHY there are doing what they do?
why is the country so desolate?
it wouldn't be from the mega corps going t here, paying little of nothing for every last piece of resource, then leaving.
no, it couldn't be there, pirates are bad....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296620</id>
	<title>Re:Why is the world so soft on pirates?</title>
	<author>Boronx</author>
	<datestamp>1259592780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Americans do have planes in the region, and they'll blow up pirates if they find them, even if they're not attacking American boats.  Problem is, it's a big area.  It's hard to take out the pirates once they've captured the hostages, and it's hard to spot them before they do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Americans do have planes in the region , and they 'll blow up pirates if they find them , even if they 're not attacking American boats .
Problem is , it 's a big area .
It 's hard to take out the pirates once they 've captured the hostages , and it 's hard to spot them before they do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Americans do have planes in the region, and they'll blow up pirates if they find them, even if they're not attacking American boats.
Problem is, it's a big area.
It's hard to take out the pirates once they've captured the hostages, and it's hard to spot them before they do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297760</id>
	<title>Somali Submarines coming soon...</title>
	<author>canadian\_in\_beijing</author>
	<datestamp>1259598960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stock exchange... more like a barter economy that has existed for centuries.  I'll trade you 10 chickens for 1 cow on a larger scale.<br>
<br>
What's worrying is that they are currently running around in 'fishing boats', but with the type of profits they are making soon it might be something far more lethal.  <br>
<br>
Possibly in 5 years new headline 'Somali Pirate Submarine threatens to sink all vessels in the straight unless all international cargo companies pay $5 million each'. <br>
<br>
There has to be a tipping point where the international community shuts these guys down.  Hopefully before they purchase missiles and other advanced military weapons. <br>
<br>
With the advanced tracking and radar technology out there can't the US or anyone track the pirates and know what they're doing?  Can't be that hard to knock them off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stock exchange... more like a barter economy that has existed for centuries .
I 'll trade you 10 chickens for 1 cow on a larger scale .
What 's worrying is that they are currently running around in 'fishing boats ' , but with the type of profits they are making soon it might be something far more lethal .
Possibly in 5 years new headline 'Somali Pirate Submarine threatens to sink all vessels in the straight unless all international cargo companies pay $ 5 million each' .
There has to be a tipping point where the international community shuts these guys down .
Hopefully before they purchase missiles and other advanced military weapons .
With the advanced tracking and radar technology out there ca n't the US or anyone track the pirates and know what they 're doing ?
Ca n't be that hard to knock them off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stock exchange... more like a barter economy that has existed for centuries.
I'll trade you 10 chickens for 1 cow on a larger scale.
What's worrying is that they are currently running around in 'fishing boats', but with the type of profits they are making soon it might be something far more lethal.
Possibly in 5 years new headline 'Somali Pirate Submarine threatens to sink all vessels in the straight unless all international cargo companies pay $5 million each'.
There has to be a tipping point where the international community shuts these guys down.
Hopefully before they purchase missiles and other advanced military weapons.
With the advanced tracking and radar technology out there can't the US or anyone track the pirates and know what they're doing?
Can't be that hard to knock them off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293796</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>allknowingfrog</author>
	<datestamp>1259691300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pirate: I'd like to borrow some money.<br>
Banker: For what?<br>
Pirate: I'm planning a bank robbery. The return on your investment will be considerable.<br>
Banker: That sounds reasonable...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pirate : I 'd like to borrow some money .
Banker : For what ?
Pirate : I 'm planning a bank robbery .
The return on your investment will be considerable .
Banker : That sounds reasonable.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pirate: I'd like to borrow some money.
Banker: For what?
Pirate: I'm planning a bank robbery.
The return on your investment will be considerable.
Banker: That sounds reasonable...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295460</id>
	<title>Here is a novel idea: taxes.</title>
	<author>jotaeleemeese</author>
	<datestamp>1259581200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not all shipping companies meet with representatives of the pirates (which seem to be  perhaps the only organized enterprise, either private or social, in the country) and agree to pay tax or to turn the "stock exchange" in  a exchange to offer security services (turning the pirates in "official" escort patrols while in Somali waters).</p><p>Why countries with interests in the region don;t look for a solution along these lines?</p><p>Realpolitik always work best, the pirates are a real political force to be dealt with, this latest development just comes to show that it is time some people should take them more seriously.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not all shipping companies meet with representatives of the pirates ( which seem to be perhaps the only organized enterprise , either private or social , in the country ) and agree to pay tax or to turn the " stock exchange " in a exchange to offer security services ( turning the pirates in " official " escort patrols while in Somali waters ) .Why countries with interests in the region don ; t look for a solution along these lines ? Realpolitik always work best , the pirates are a real political force to be dealt with , this latest development just comes to show that it is time some people should take them more seriously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not all shipping companies meet with representatives of the pirates (which seem to be  perhaps the only organized enterprise, either private or social, in the country) and agree to pay tax or to turn the "stock exchange" in  a exchange to offer security services (turning the pirates in "official" escort patrols while in Somali waters).Why countries with interests in the region don;t look for a solution along these lines?Realpolitik always work best, the pirates are a real political force to be dealt with, this latest development just comes to show that it is time some people should take them more seriously.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30298054</id>
	<title>Haradheere?</title>
	<author>WinPimp2K</author>
	<datestamp>1259600340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suspect that the name of this town might be changed on the maps to "Bombheere", as soon as the pirates sufficiently annoy any of the nations with a military presence in the area.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect that the name of this town might be changed on the maps to " Bombheere " , as soon as the pirates sufficiently annoy any of the nations with a military presence in the area .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect that the name of this town might be changed on the maps to "Bombheere", as soon as the pirates sufficiently annoy any of the nations with a military presence in the area.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296116</id>
	<title>Re:there's one born every minute</title>
	<author>WinterSolstice</author>
	<datestamp>1259589000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think this is how it always starts... East India Trading Company anyone? I'm sure the only difference here is that the Somalian version is missing the Royal sanction, and there are no subjugated peoples to steal from... I mean trade with</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this is how it always starts... East India Trading Company anyone ?
I 'm sure the only difference here is that the Somalian version is missing the Royal sanction , and there are no subjugated peoples to steal from... I mean trade with</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this is how it always starts... East India Trading Company anyone?
I'm sure the only difference here is that the Somalian version is missing the Royal sanction, and there are no subjugated peoples to steal from... I mean trade with</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295756</id>
	<title>Re:Meeting Places Make Excellent Drone Targets</title>
	<author>Kaenneth</author>
	<datestamp>1259585040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, very few ships are flagged from the US; the shipping companies don't like paying taxes, so they register in tax havens that don't provide any support.</p><p>When a US flagged ship is threatened however, you get snipers like for the 'Maersk Alabama'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , very few ships are flagged from the US ; the shipping companies do n't like paying taxes , so they register in tax havens that do n't provide any support.When a US flagged ship is threatened however , you get snipers like for the 'Maersk Alabama'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, very few ships are flagged from the US; the shipping companies don't like paying taxes, so they register in tax havens that don't provide any support.When a US flagged ship is threatened however, you get snipers like for the 'Maersk Alabama'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295414</id>
	<title>Becasue the world is not so gun ho.</title>
	<author>jotaeleemeese</author>
	<datestamp>1259580600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is only you guys in the US, with the fetishist attachment to your guns, who see a solution on each firefight.</p><p>The logical long term solution to the problem would be to stablish a permanent stable government in Somalia, with international cooperation to find a solution.</p><p>So your navy killed a few pirates. How valiant. Completely useless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is only you guys in the US , with the fetishist attachment to your guns , who see a solution on each firefight.The logical long term solution to the problem would be to stablish a permanent stable government in Somalia , with international cooperation to find a solution.So your navy killed a few pirates .
How valiant .
Completely useless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is only you guys in the US, with the fetishist attachment to your guns, who see a solution on each firefight.The logical long term solution to the problem would be to stablish a permanent stable government in Somalia, with international cooperation to find a solution.So your navy killed a few pirates.
How valiant.
Completely useless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293644</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>adavies42</author>
	<datestamp>1259690160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Somewhere, someone smarter than you is saying <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood\_accounting" title="wikipedia.org">"They're freaking producers! This woman is an idiot if she expects any money from this. It's not like she's investing in pirates!"</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somewhere , someone smarter than you is saying " They 're freaking producers !
This woman is an idiot if she expects any money from this .
It 's not like she 's investing in pirates !
" [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somewhere, someone smarter than you is saying "They're freaking producers!
This woman is an idiot if she expects any money from this.
It's not like she's investing in pirates!
" [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293720</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>bendodge</author>
	<datestamp>1259690820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's obviously not rule of law. You're trying an implied attack on the United States' economic model, which is heavily dependent on the rule of law.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's obviously not rule of law .
You 're trying an implied attack on the United States ' economic model , which is heavily dependent on the rule of law .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's obviously not rule of law.
You're trying an implied attack on the United States' economic model, which is heavily dependent on the rule of law.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30299600</id>
	<title>Re:It's no different from any other raiding cultur</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259607060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Palestinians had/have a similar thing where people "invest" in digging tunnels to smuggle goods under the Egyptian border.  Generally pretty profitable, though fairly financially risky, very similar to the early shipping pools.  Unfortunately turns out some of them (not sure how many) were basically Ponzi schemes and when people went to withdraw some of their "profits" turned out it was all gone.  I wouldn't be surprised if the same thing happens here - Somalia has even less effective government, and there'd be essentially no chance of getting prosecuted (though lynched, pretty good chance of getting lynched if you weren't quick on your feet).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Palestinians had/have a similar thing where people " invest " in digging tunnels to smuggle goods under the Egyptian border .
Generally pretty profitable , though fairly financially risky , very similar to the early shipping pools .
Unfortunately turns out some of them ( not sure how many ) were basically Ponzi schemes and when people went to withdraw some of their " profits " turned out it was all gone .
I would n't be surprised if the same thing happens here - Somalia has even less effective government , and there 'd be essentially no chance of getting prosecuted ( though lynched , pretty good chance of getting lynched if you were n't quick on your feet ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Palestinians had/have a similar thing where people "invest" in digging tunnels to smuggle goods under the Egyptian border.
Generally pretty profitable, though fairly financially risky, very similar to the early shipping pools.
Unfortunately turns out some of them (not sure how many) were basically Ponzi schemes and when people went to withdraw some of their "profits" turned out it was all gone.
I wouldn't be surprised if the same thing happens here - Somalia has even less effective government, and there'd be essentially no chance of getting prosecuted (though lynched, pretty good chance of getting lynched if you weren't quick on your feet).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295096</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259576760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Palestinians in Gaza have tried a similar approach with the smuggling gangs going under the border to Egypt.<br>The whole "investment" system crashed because it was in no small part a pyramid scheme. As a consequence Hamas government seized the assets of those involved, being able to pay the "investors" back only a quarter of their "investment".<br>As much as we despise the western financial system right now, these guys have a system which, by it's very definition, is served by crooks, and for crooks. Not a good starting point, but one that is bound to raise more money into the piracy business and the local warlords that provide them with protection. What could go wrong?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Palestinians in Gaza have tried a similar approach with the smuggling gangs going under the border to Egypt.The whole " investment " system crashed because it was in no small part a pyramid scheme .
As a consequence Hamas government seized the assets of those involved , being able to pay the " investors " back only a quarter of their " investment " .As much as we despise the western financial system right now , these guys have a system which , by it 's very definition , is served by crooks , and for crooks .
Not a good starting point , but one that is bound to raise more money into the piracy business and the local warlords that provide them with protection .
What could go wrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Palestinians in Gaza have tried a similar approach with the smuggling gangs going under the border to Egypt.The whole "investment" system crashed because it was in no small part a pyramid scheme.
As a consequence Hamas government seized the assets of those involved, being able to pay the "investors" back only a quarter of their "investment".As much as we despise the western financial system right now, these guys have a system which, by it's very definition, is served by crooks, and for crooks.
Not a good starting point, but one that is bound to raise more money into the piracy business and the local warlords that provide them with protection.
What could go wrong?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295014</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259575500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Help them grow up some more - free glass carpet treatment, border to border; and NO taking refugees by any country. But the world "powers" are too chicken and "PC" to actually DO this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Help them grow up some more - free glass carpet treatment , border to border ; and NO taking refugees by any country .
But the world " powers " are too chicken and " PC " to actually DO this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Help them grow up some more - free glass carpet treatment, border to border; and NO taking refugees by any country.
But the world "powers" are too chicken and "PC" to actually DO this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297218</id>
	<title>How do you test an RPG ?</title>
	<author>bugs2squash</author>
	<datestamp>1259596380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've never seen one, but I doubt that they are easy to test without actually firing them. If I were an insurance company I would use this market to "invest" non-functional weapons. As a bonus, if the pirates succeed anyway, you get some of your money back.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never seen one , but I doubt that they are easy to test without actually firing them .
If I were an insurance company I would use this market to " invest " non-functional weapons .
As a bonus , if the pirates succeed anyway , you get some of your money back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never seen one, but I doubt that they are easy to test without actually firing them.
If I were an insurance company I would use this market to "invest" non-functional weapons.
As a bonus, if the pirates succeed anyway, you get some of your money back.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294780</id>
	<title>Single point of failure</title>
	<author>1s44c</author>
	<datestamp>1259572320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A single well known 'stock exchange' for this kind of activity gives the world a neat target that could be taken out quickly and efficiently with a single bomb.</p><p>It's a principle of most legal systems that anyone knowingly assisting in crime is also a criminal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A single well known 'stock exchange ' for this kind of activity gives the world a neat target that could be taken out quickly and efficiently with a single bomb.It 's a principle of most legal systems that anyone knowingly assisting in crime is also a criminal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A single well known 'stock exchange' for this kind of activity gives the world a neat target that could be taken out quickly and efficiently with a single bomb.It's a principle of most legal systems that anyone knowingly assisting in crime is also a criminal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293562</id>
	<title>Also saving the environment</title>
	<author>aurelianito</author>
	<datestamp>1259689620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By supporting the pirate industry, they give jobs and new opportunities to the local people. But this is not the only reason why we should support them. They do an amazing job <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying\_Spaghetti\_Monster#Pirates\_and\_global\_warming" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">reverting the global warming</a> [wikipedia.org]. Every ecologically responsible person should invest in this stock exchange.</p><p>In unrelated news, it is rumored that the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow\_Warrior" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Rainbow Warrior</a> [wikipedia.org] will join their fleet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By supporting the pirate industry , they give jobs and new opportunities to the local people .
But this is not the only reason why we should support them .
They do an amazing job reverting the global warming [ wikipedia.org ] .
Every ecologically responsible person should invest in this stock exchange.In unrelated news , it is rumored that the Rainbow Warrior [ wikipedia.org ] will join their fleet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By supporting the pirate industry, they give jobs and new opportunities to the local people.
But this is not the only reason why we should support them.
They do an amazing job reverting the global warming [wikipedia.org].
Every ecologically responsible person should invest in this stock exchange.In unrelated news, it is rumored that the Rainbow Warrior [wikipedia.org] will join their fleet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30303320</id>
	<title>Re:just bomb them</title>
	<author>91degrees</author>
	<datestamp>1259578020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I assume sailors know the risk of being captured by pirates, and are briefed on company policy on ransom payments before they approach pirate infested waters.<br> <br>
So, out of interest, would you tell the sailors beforehand that you will kill them if they get captured by pirates, or would you only hire crew who were willing to lay down their life for your future profitability or would you wait for crew who didn't ask what your policy is?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I assume sailors know the risk of being captured by pirates , and are briefed on company policy on ransom payments before they approach pirate infested waters .
So , out of interest , would you tell the sailors beforehand that you will kill them if they get captured by pirates , or would you only hire crew who were willing to lay down their life for your future profitability or would you wait for crew who did n't ask what your policy is ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I assume sailors know the risk of being captured by pirates, and are briefed on company policy on ransom payments before they approach pirate infested waters.
So, out of interest, would you tell the sailors beforehand that you will kill them if they get captured by pirates, or would you only hire crew who were willing to lay down their life for your future profitability or would you wait for crew who didn't ask what your policy is?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295706</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>Kaenneth</author>
	<datestamp>1259584440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"They're freaking pirates! This woman is an idiot if she expects any money from this. It's not like she's seeding a movie!"</p><p>Knowing about the legal fights over royalties from movies like 'Forrest Gump' and 'Lord of the Rings'... I would feel safer trusting my money to a pirate than a movie studio.</p><p>But then I lent $30,000 to an attorney recovering from crack addiction to restart his business. (he's been paying me on time for 2 years so far)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" They 're freaking pirates !
This woman is an idiot if she expects any money from this .
It 's not like she 's seeding a movie !
" Knowing about the legal fights over royalties from movies like 'Forrest Gump ' and 'Lord of the Rings'... I would feel safer trusting my money to a pirate than a movie studio.But then I lent $ 30,000 to an attorney recovering from crack addiction to restart his business .
( he 's been paying me on time for 2 years so far )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"They're freaking pirates!
This woman is an idiot if she expects any money from this.
It's not like she's seeding a movie!
"Knowing about the legal fights over royalties from movies like 'Forrest Gump' and 'Lord of the Rings'... I would feel safer trusting my money to a pirate than a movie studio.But then I lent $30,000 to an attorney recovering from crack addiction to restart his business.
(he's been paying me on time for 2 years so far)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30300072</id>
	<title>Re:Why not?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259609280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; OTOH, the Dutch East India Company was effectively a legally recognized government.<br>&gt; They had the power to raise armies, sign treaties, invade &amp; depose governments, etc.</p><p>and to carry out slave raids, loot, carry out pirate attacks...</p><p>&gt; If you don't see the difference then you're being willfully blind.</p><p>Sure, it was legal as far as the Dutch were concerned, because the government<br>itself said it was ok. It doesn't mean it was morally right.</p><p>Somalian pirates don't even have a government to say it is right or wrong. So<br>looking at it in that way, they're somewhat more moral than the Dutch were<br>in the Dutch "Golden Century".</p><p>Just highlighting the moral relativism here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; OTOH , the Dutch East India Company was effectively a legally recognized government. &gt; They had the power to raise armies , sign treaties , invade &amp; depose governments , etc.and to carry out slave raids , loot , carry out pirate attacks... &gt; If you do n't see the difference then you 're being willfully blind.Sure , it was legal as far as the Dutch were concerned , because the governmentitself said it was ok. It does n't mean it was morally right.Somalian pirates do n't even have a government to say it is right or wrong .
Solooking at it in that way , they 're somewhat more moral than the Dutch werein the Dutch " Golden Century " .Just highlighting the moral relativism here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; OTOH, the Dutch East India Company was effectively a legally recognized government.&gt; They had the power to raise armies, sign treaties, invade &amp; depose governments, etc.and to carry out slave raids, loot, carry out pirate attacks...&gt; If you don't see the difference then you're being willfully blind.Sure, it was legal as far as the Dutch were concerned, because the governmentitself said it was ok. It doesn't mean it was morally right.Somalian pirates don't even have a government to say it is right or wrong.
Solooking at it in that way, they're somewhat more moral than the Dutch werein the Dutch "Golden Century".Just highlighting the moral relativism here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294214</id>
	<title>Every Investor</title>
	<author>Renraku</author>
	<datestamp>1259695440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Every investor that invests in this stock market should be arrested for piracy by proxy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every investor that invests in this stock market should be arrested for piracy by proxy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every investor that invests in this stock market should be arrested for piracy by proxy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294122</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>Valdrax</author>
	<datestamp>1259694240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you win the crazy Libertarian strawman contest for this discussion.<br>I was going to say something about GP going too far, but... wow, that's just amazing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you win the crazy Libertarian strawman contest for this discussion.I was going to say something about GP going too far , but... wow , that 's just amazing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you win the crazy Libertarian strawman contest for this discussion.I was going to say something about GP going too far, but... wow, that's just amazing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294404</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1259697420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's actually likely. Not because of a code of conduct, I'd simply see this as some sort of business. And business is business. On both ends. Sure, you could hire people to do your work and then kill instead of pay them. But then your business is over, because nobody would take their place. And I do think that they plan to keep this running. Yes, it's an "illegal" business, but look at Mafia structures. A Mafia don does not off his killers, he pays them. He kills them when they betray him, which is basically the same your boss would maybe do when you mess up your job if he didn't have to worry about troubles with the law. The incentive to be a good worker is pretty high in such an environment, incredibly good pay and a gun at your temple if you mess up. The incentive for your boss to pay instead of kill you is there as well, since he does compete with other "companies" which don't really mind doing a hostile takeover.</p><p>And these takeovers usually do not include golden parachutes for the former CEOs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's actually likely .
Not because of a code of conduct , I 'd simply see this as some sort of business .
And business is business .
On both ends .
Sure , you could hire people to do your work and then kill instead of pay them .
But then your business is over , because nobody would take their place .
And I do think that they plan to keep this running .
Yes , it 's an " illegal " business , but look at Mafia structures .
A Mafia don does not off his killers , he pays them .
He kills them when they betray him , which is basically the same your boss would maybe do when you mess up your job if he did n't have to worry about troubles with the law .
The incentive to be a good worker is pretty high in such an environment , incredibly good pay and a gun at your temple if you mess up .
The incentive for your boss to pay instead of kill you is there as well , since he does compete with other " companies " which do n't really mind doing a hostile takeover.And these takeovers usually do not include golden parachutes for the former CEOs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's actually likely.
Not because of a code of conduct, I'd simply see this as some sort of business.
And business is business.
On both ends.
Sure, you could hire people to do your work and then kill instead of pay them.
But then your business is over, because nobody would take their place.
And I do think that they plan to keep this running.
Yes, it's an "illegal" business, but look at Mafia structures.
A Mafia don does not off his killers, he pays them.
He kills them when they betray him, which is basically the same your boss would maybe do when you mess up your job if he didn't have to worry about troubles with the law.
The incentive to be a good worker is pretty high in such an environment, incredibly good pay and a gun at your temple if you mess up.
The incentive for your boss to pay instead of kill you is there as well, since he does compete with other "companies" which don't really mind doing a hostile takeover.And these takeovers usually do not include golden parachutes for the former CEOs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294394</id>
	<title>Why is the world so soft on pirates?</title>
	<author>Clomer</author>
	<datestamp>1259697300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's interesting to me that the only incident involving these Somali pirates and an American vessel resulted in the US Navy getting involved, a few dead pirates, and a rescued civilian Captain.  I think it's great that our military took such a firm stance against those pirates and actually protected American citizens.  Why don't other nations' militaries take a similar hard-line approach?<br>
<br>
All it would take is a few more stories about how a military vessel used lethal force against pirates to protect innocent civilians, and the piracy would dramatically decrease.  Heck, a single aircraft carrier in the region, launching planes to fly patrols which would respond to distress calls, would go a long way to securing the region.  Why isn't this done?</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's interesting to me that the only incident involving these Somali pirates and an American vessel resulted in the US Navy getting involved , a few dead pirates , and a rescued civilian Captain .
I think it 's great that our military took such a firm stance against those pirates and actually protected American citizens .
Why do n't other nations ' militaries take a similar hard-line approach ?
All it would take is a few more stories about how a military vessel used lethal force against pirates to protect innocent civilians , and the piracy would dramatically decrease .
Heck , a single aircraft carrier in the region , launching planes to fly patrols which would respond to distress calls , would go a long way to securing the region .
Why is n't this done ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's interesting to me that the only incident involving these Somali pirates and an American vessel resulted in the US Navy getting involved, a few dead pirates, and a rescued civilian Captain.
I think it's great that our military took such a firm stance against those pirates and actually protected American citizens.
Why don't other nations' militaries take a similar hard-line approach?
All it would take is a few more stories about how a military vessel used lethal force against pirates to protect innocent civilians, and the piracy would dramatically decrease.
Heck, a single aircraft carrier in the region, launching planes to fly patrols which would respond to distress calls, would go a long way to securing the region.
Why isn't this done?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294960</id>
	<title>Re:Every Investor</title>
	<author>u38cg</author>
	<datestamp>1259575080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Umm, if you have a number for the Somali Police Department, I'm sure we'd all love to hear about it...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm , if you have a number for the Somali Police Department , I 'm sure we 'd all love to hear about it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm, if you have a number for the Somali Police Department, I'm sure we'd all love to hear about it...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294730</id>
	<title>Do we need this on here at all</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259614620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1 ,  Do we need this crap on here at all , We are afterall talking about some of the biggest shitheads on the planet here the Somalis<br>2 ,  Is it not about time the rest of the world started blowing some of these Somali jerks clean out of the water the very moment they are spotted on the radar<br>3 ,  Never mind  sending in the soldiers just Nuke Somalia  and save the world in general a lot of problems<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..</p><p>Background<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..</p><p>Here in the UK Police are to NOT to stop suspect vehicles if they think the occupants may be of omali origin ,  There is not ONE honest working Somali they ALL are notorious theives pickpockets will stab and or shoot at the slightest hint of a problem  have ZERO respect for other people and their property and possesions .</p><p>And before you all start getting wet panties about it then ask others that KNOW  not the wollie woofters that are in the we cant do that it might hurt them corner  kill the whole lot off a vermin on the planet</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 , Do we need this crap on here at all , We are afterall talking about some of the biggest shitheads on the planet here the Somalis2 , Is it not about time the rest of the world started blowing some of these Somali jerks clean out of the water the very moment they are spotted on the radar3 , Never mind sending in the soldiers just Nuke Somalia and save the world in general a lot of problems ..Background ..Here in the UK Police are to NOT to stop suspect vehicles if they think the occupants may be of omali origin , There is not ONE honest working Somali they ALL are notorious theives pickpockets will stab and or shoot at the slightest hint of a problem have ZERO respect for other people and their property and possesions .And before you all start getting wet panties about it then ask others that KNOW not the wollie woofters that are in the we cant do that it might hurt them corner kill the whole lot off a vermin on the planet</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1 ,  Do we need this crap on here at all , We are afterall talking about some of the biggest shitheads on the planet here the Somalis2 ,  Is it not about time the rest of the world started blowing some of these Somali jerks clean out of the water the very moment they are spotted on the radar3 ,  Never mind  sending in the soldiers just Nuke Somalia  and save the world in general a lot of problems ..Background ..Here in the UK Police are to NOT to stop suspect vehicles if they think the occupants may be of omali origin ,  There is not ONE honest working Somali they ALL are notorious theives pickpockets will stab and or shoot at the slightest hint of a problem  have ZERO respect for other people and their property and possesions .And before you all start getting wet panties about it then ask others that KNOW  not the wollie woofters that are in the we cant do that it might hurt them corner  kill the whole lot off a vermin on the planet</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296750</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259593620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is unregulated laissez faire capitalism at its finest.</p></div><p>The cyberpunk literature will find its renaissance not from the sprawls of the Far East but from the varied geographical areas of Africa. Urban corporate warfare mixed with Predator style jungle scenes, smugglers with their hovercrafts flying above the savannah and steppes, narrowly escaping the combined forces of the remaining governments and mayors of the independent free cities. Economical zones as large as 5000-8000 years ago, spreading across the African continent with the guiding principle of anarchy and non-uniformity. Africa learns to stand on its own for the first time since the colonization, imperialism and slave trade destroyed the previous large scale structures.<br>To the topic again. The Americans will prefer the pirates to any kind of Islamic government since the pirates can be bought. They have indirectly assassinated African ideologically (like democracy and national interest) driven political leaders before.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is unregulated laissez faire capitalism at its finest.The cyberpunk literature will find its renaissance not from the sprawls of the Far East but from the varied geographical areas of Africa .
Urban corporate warfare mixed with Predator style jungle scenes , smugglers with their hovercrafts flying above the savannah and steppes , narrowly escaping the combined forces of the remaining governments and mayors of the independent free cities .
Economical zones as large as 5000-8000 years ago , spreading across the African continent with the guiding principle of anarchy and non-uniformity .
Africa learns to stand on its own for the first time since the colonization , imperialism and slave trade destroyed the previous large scale structures.To the topic again .
The Americans will prefer the pirates to any kind of Islamic government since the pirates can be bought .
They have indirectly assassinated African ideologically ( like democracy and national interest ) driven political leaders before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is unregulated laissez faire capitalism at its finest.The cyberpunk literature will find its renaissance not from the sprawls of the Far East but from the varied geographical areas of Africa.
Urban corporate warfare mixed with Predator style jungle scenes, smugglers with their hovercrafts flying above the savannah and steppes, narrowly escaping the combined forces of the remaining governments and mayors of the independent free cities.
Economical zones as large as 5000-8000 years ago, spreading across the African continent with the guiding principle of anarchy and non-uniformity.
Africa learns to stand on its own for the first time since the colonization, imperialism and slave trade destroyed the previous large scale structures.To the topic again.
The Americans will prefer the pirates to any kind of Islamic government since the pirates can be bought.
They have indirectly assassinated African ideologically (like democracy and national interest) driven political leaders before.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293594</id>
	<title>Who says crime doesn't pay?</title>
	<author>GrubLord</author>
	<datestamp>1259689800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... but what kind of a maniac gives his ex-wife an RPG in alimony?</p><p>He's just lucky she decided to 'invest' it, rather than go all Blues Brothers on him.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... but what kind of a maniac gives his ex-wife an RPG in alimony ? He 's just lucky she decided to 'invest ' it , rather than go all Blues Brothers on him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... but what kind of a maniac gives his ex-wife an RPG in alimony?He's just lucky she decided to 'invest' it, rather than go all Blues Brothers on him.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294754</id>
	<title>How very libertarian of them</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259572020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now watch the slashbot libertards try to reconcile opposition to this anarchistic exploitative system with their adherence to <em>their own</em> anarchistic exploitative systems.</p><p>Somehow it's ok when white bankers fuck people over for profit but not when black mud-people from countries we don't like do it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now watch the slashbot libertards try to reconcile opposition to this anarchistic exploitative system with their adherence to their own anarchistic exploitative systems.Somehow it 's ok when white bankers fuck people over for profit but not when black mud-people from countries we do n't like do it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now watch the slashbot libertards try to reconcile opposition to this anarchistic exploitative system with their adherence to their own anarchistic exploitative systems.Somehow it's ok when white bankers fuck people over for profit but not when black mud-people from countries we don't like do it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294528</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>AHuxley</author>
	<datestamp>1259612160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What your average pirate does to 1 ship, your average City or NY bankster does to a town, state or small country.<br>
<a href="http://www.alternet.org/story/144203/" title="alternet.org">http://www.alternet.org/story/144203/</a> [alternet.org] <br>
"Bailed-Out AIG Forcing Poor to Choose Between Running Water and Food"</htmltext>
<tokenext>What your average pirate does to 1 ship , your average City or NY bankster does to a town , state or small country .
http : //www.alternet.org/story/144203/ [ alternet.org ] " Bailed-Out AIG Forcing Poor to Choose Between Running Water and Food "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What your average pirate does to 1 ship, your average City or NY bankster does to a town, state or small country.
http://www.alternet.org/story/144203/ [alternet.org] 
"Bailed-Out AIG Forcing Poor to Choose Between Running Water and Food"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294902</id>
	<title>Just some?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259574300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can't we send them all?</p><p>I can't think of anybody willing to pay their ransom...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't we send them all ? I ca n't think of anybody willing to pay their ransom.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't we send them all?I can't think of anybody willing to pay their ransom...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294514</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1259611920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's a law. It's directly negotiated between the participating parties instead of a superstructure called government, but you don't think they are not acting according to terms and agreements, do you?</p><p>The terms may be as simple as "stay offa my turf or suck my RPG", but you may rest assured that there are agreements in place. Which, btw, is probably the wet dream of a few companies here as well, no government to interfere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a law .
It 's directly negotiated between the participating parties instead of a superstructure called government , but you do n't think they are not acting according to terms and agreements , do you ? The terms may be as simple as " stay offa my turf or suck my RPG " , but you may rest assured that there are agreements in place .
Which , btw , is probably the wet dream of a few companies here as well , no government to interfere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a law.
It's directly negotiated between the participating parties instead of a superstructure called government, but you don't think they are not acting according to terms and agreements, do you?The terms may be as simple as "stay offa my turf or suck my RPG", but you may rest assured that there are agreements in place.
Which, btw, is probably the wet dream of a few companies here as well, no government to interfere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294994</id>
	<title>Re:Why is the world so soft on pirates?</title>
	<author>u38cg</author>
	<datestamp>1259575320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The large number of nationalities involved, the difficulty in responding in adequate time, the problems with communication, and worst of all, the craven owners that pay the protection money to get their ship moving again.  This last group are the ones who should be getting jailed.  The pirates are just rational economic actors, but the owners are poisoning the commons for everyone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The large number of nationalities involved , the difficulty in responding in adequate time , the problems with communication , and worst of all , the craven owners that pay the protection money to get their ship moving again .
This last group are the ones who should be getting jailed .
The pirates are just rational economic actors , but the owners are poisoning the commons for everyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The large number of nationalities involved, the difficulty in responding in adequate time, the problems with communication, and worst of all, the craven owners that pay the protection money to get their ship moving again.
This last group are the ones who should be getting jailed.
The pirates are just rational economic actors, but the owners are poisoning the commons for everyone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293626</id>
	<title>I'll invest..</title>
	<author>RJFerret</author>
	<datestamp>1259690100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...in the Sirens.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...in the Sirens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...in the Sirens.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534</id>
	<title>Why not?</title>
	<author>mister\_playboy</author>
	<datestamp>1259689320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just a brief read of the article about the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch\_East\_India\_Company" title="wikipedia.org">Dutch East India Company</a> [wikipedia.org] makes me wonder just how different the two really are.</p><p>Legitimacy as a company seems to be determined by how well you succeed and how long you've been around, more than your morals or ethics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a brief read of the article about the Dutch East India Company [ wikipedia.org ] makes me wonder just how different the two really are.Legitimacy as a company seems to be determined by how well you succeed and how long you 've been around , more than your morals or ethics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a brief read of the article about the Dutch East India Company [wikipedia.org] makes me wonder just how different the two really are.Legitimacy as a company seems to be determined by how well you succeed and how long you've been around, more than your morals or ethics.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294538</id>
	<title>Re:Why not?</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1259612340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Just a brief read of the article about the Dutch East India Company makes me wonder just how different the two really are.</p></div><p>Somalia doesn't really have a functional government.<br>Somali pirates are operating in a power vaccuum and will go away once it gets filled.</p><p>OTOH, the Dutch East India Company was effectively a legally recognized government.<br>They had the power to raise armies, sign treaties, invade &amp; depose governments, etc.</p><p>It's not just a matter of "how long you've been around".<br>If you don't see the difference then you're being willfully blind.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a brief read of the article about the Dutch East India Company makes me wonder just how different the two really are.Somalia does n't really have a functional government.Somali pirates are operating in a power vaccuum and will go away once it gets filled.OTOH , the Dutch East India Company was effectively a legally recognized government.They had the power to raise armies , sign treaties , invade &amp; depose governments , etc.It 's not just a matter of " how long you 've been around " .If you do n't see the difference then you 're being willfully blind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a brief read of the article about the Dutch East India Company makes me wonder just how different the two really are.Somalia doesn't really have a functional government.Somali pirates are operating in a power vaccuum and will go away once it gets filled.OTOH, the Dutch East India Company was effectively a legally recognized government.They had the power to raise armies, sign treaties, invade &amp; depose governments, etc.It's not just a matter of "how long you've been around".If you don't see the difference then you're being willfully blind.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30301096</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1259614200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One thing that actually surprises me is that there are still attacks going on. In general, such "business model" very quickly transforms to the classic "We will 'protect' your ships if you pay us" scheme, and all the various 'protecting' clans agree to not attack each other's clients - so no attacks. Did Somali pirates actually try to put up such demands? Were they refused?</p><p>It just sounds to me that companies shipping goods would very much prefer to just pay a certain fixed amount of money, and have guaranteed delivery of goods, rather than having a certain number of randomly picked ships sailing through the area captured, throwing off the schedules in unexpected ways.</p><p>May end up cheaper, too - part of what pirates get is "payment" for the high personal risk when boarding ships; if they just sit on their asses and collect a monthly fee, the risk isn't there anymore, so it is possible to negotiate with them for less than they'd otherwise take from you.</p><p>And before you mention "no deals with terrorists", keep in mind that I'm talking about corporations here, not governments. Corporations always measure things in risk and profitability, and don't bother with ideological issues. If it's cheaper to deal, a deal it will be.</p><p>Hm... in fact, perhaps such deals are in place already, and we just don't know about them; and ships that are being attacked are only of those companies that refused it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One thing that actually surprises me is that there are still attacks going on .
In general , such " business model " very quickly transforms to the classic " We will 'protect ' your ships if you pay us " scheme , and all the various 'protecting ' clans agree to not attack each other 's clients - so no attacks .
Did Somali pirates actually try to put up such demands ?
Were they refused ? It just sounds to me that companies shipping goods would very much prefer to just pay a certain fixed amount of money , and have guaranteed delivery of goods , rather than having a certain number of randomly picked ships sailing through the area captured , throwing off the schedules in unexpected ways.May end up cheaper , too - part of what pirates get is " payment " for the high personal risk when boarding ships ; if they just sit on their asses and collect a monthly fee , the risk is n't there anymore , so it is possible to negotiate with them for less than they 'd otherwise take from you.And before you mention " no deals with terrorists " , keep in mind that I 'm talking about corporations here , not governments .
Corporations always measure things in risk and profitability , and do n't bother with ideological issues .
If it 's cheaper to deal , a deal it will be.Hm... in fact , perhaps such deals are in place already , and we just do n't know about them ; and ships that are being attacked are only of those companies that refused it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One thing that actually surprises me is that there are still attacks going on.
In general, such "business model" very quickly transforms to the classic "We will 'protect' your ships if you pay us" scheme, and all the various 'protecting' clans agree to not attack each other's clients - so no attacks.
Did Somali pirates actually try to put up such demands?
Were they refused?It just sounds to me that companies shipping goods would very much prefer to just pay a certain fixed amount of money, and have guaranteed delivery of goods, rather than having a certain number of randomly picked ships sailing through the area captured, throwing off the schedules in unexpected ways.May end up cheaper, too - part of what pirates get is "payment" for the high personal risk when boarding ships; if they just sit on their asses and collect a monthly fee, the risk isn't there anymore, so it is possible to negotiate with them for less than they'd otherwise take from you.And before you mention "no deals with terrorists", keep in mind that I'm talking about corporations here, not governments.
Corporations always measure things in risk and profitability, and don't bother with ideological issues.
If it's cheaper to deal, a deal it will be.Hm... in fact, perhaps such deals are in place already, and we just don't know about them; and ships that are being attacked are only of those companies that refused it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294150</id>
	<title>I've got an idea...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259694600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about we contribute a 4 week bombing campaign on that place with a fleet of B-52's? I wonder what that would trade for?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about we contribute a 4 week bombing campaign on that place with a fleet of B-52 's ?
I wonder what that would trade for ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about we contribute a 4 week bombing campaign on that place with a fleet of B-52's?
I wonder what that would trade for?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294084</id>
	<title>Re:This is a really bad idea</title>
	<author>Therefore I am</author>
	<datestamp>1259694000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext> As a scheme it also has the supreme disadvantage that if the records of investors were lost in an accidental Cruise Missile bombing the pirates will have a lot of aggrieved investors on their backs. Nasty stuff then happens, with a poor outcome for those who are seen to be not doing the right thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a scheme it also has the supreme disadvantage that if the records of investors were lost in an accidental Cruise Missile bombing the pirates will have a lot of aggrieved investors on their backs .
Nasty stuff then happens , with a poor outcome for those who are seen to be not doing the right thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> As a scheme it also has the supreme disadvantage that if the records of investors were lost in an accidental Cruise Missile bombing the pirates will have a lot of aggrieved investors on their backs.
Nasty stuff then happens, with a poor outcome for those who are seen to be not doing the right thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296198</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259589600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The grandparent said nothing of being American.  Regardless, citizens of the U.S. and virtually any other country are bound by their own nations' laws.  It does not matter if piracy is legal in Somalia.  So long as it is illegal in the investor's home nation, they are subject to criminal prosecution.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The grandparent said nothing of being American .
Regardless , citizens of the U.S. and virtually any other country are bound by their own nations ' laws .
It does not matter if piracy is legal in Somalia .
So long as it is illegal in the investor 's home nation , they are subject to criminal prosecution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The grandparent said nothing of being American.
Regardless, citizens of the U.S. and virtually any other country are bound by their own nations' laws.
It does not matter if piracy is legal in Somalia.
So long as it is illegal in the investor's home nation, they are subject to criminal prosecution.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294932</id>
	<title>The Pirate Market</title>
	<author>EEPROMS</author>
	<datestamp>1259574780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>arrrr being a pirate is a high risk investment, especially when there be a market correction in the form of a 1000lb smart bomb.</htmltext>
<tokenext>arrrr being a pirate is a high risk investment , especially when there be a market correction in the form of a 1000lb smart bomb .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>arrrr being a pirate is a high risk investment, especially when there be a market correction in the form of a 1000lb smart bomb.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294432</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong.</title>
	<author>Martin Blank</author>
	<datestamp>1259611320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The US is party to treaties signed by almost every nation, and accepted by the UN, that piracy by any entity against any vessel of any flag is subject to action by any nation's navy.  Jurisdiction does not end until the short.  If a US Navy destroyer sees a Malaysian-flagged vessel take over a Korean-flagged vessel that tries to disappear into Indonesian waters, it is fully in its rights to pursue, even if it means entering Indonesian waters.  If necessary, it may even open fire in those waters to stop the piracy.</p><p>There aren't many things that readily cross national borders without much question, but fighting piracy on the high seas is certainly one of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The US is party to treaties signed by almost every nation , and accepted by the UN , that piracy by any entity against any vessel of any flag is subject to action by any nation 's navy .
Jurisdiction does not end until the short .
If a US Navy destroyer sees a Malaysian-flagged vessel take over a Korean-flagged vessel that tries to disappear into Indonesian waters , it is fully in its rights to pursue , even if it means entering Indonesian waters .
If necessary , it may even open fire in those waters to stop the piracy.There are n't many things that readily cross national borders without much question , but fighting piracy on the high seas is certainly one of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The US is party to treaties signed by almost every nation, and accepted by the UN, that piracy by any entity against any vessel of any flag is subject to action by any nation's navy.
Jurisdiction does not end until the short.
If a US Navy destroyer sees a Malaysian-flagged vessel take over a Korean-flagged vessel that tries to disappear into Indonesian waters, it is fully in its rights to pursue, even if it means entering Indonesian waters.
If necessary, it may even open fire in those waters to stop the piracy.There aren't many things that readily cross national borders without much question, but fighting piracy on the high seas is certainly one of them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294170</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259694780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As Bill Gates tries so save humanity now, he should invest in this to stop <a href="http://www.venganza.org/about/open-letter/" title="venganza.org" rel="nofollow">global warming</a> [venganza.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As Bill Gates tries so save humanity now , he should invest in this to stop global warming [ venganza.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As Bill Gates tries so save humanity now, he should invest in this to stop global warming [venganza.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294442</id>
	<title>Re:It's no different from any other raiding cultur</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259611380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I raid in WoW, does that made me any difference?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I raid in WoW , does that made me any difference ?
: p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I raid in WoW, does that made me any difference?
:p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294206</id>
	<title>Wall Street is Jealous</title>
	<author>Herkum01</author>
	<datestamp>1259695380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They don't even pretend they are not robbing their customers!</htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't even pretend they are not robbing their customers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't even pretend they are not robbing their customers!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30311506</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>nsteinme</author>
	<datestamp>1259860980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have no idea why you got modded up and GP down. He was obviously referring only to Somalia with his remark about laissez faire capitalism. There are FAIAP<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/no/ laws there.</p><p>I am also confused by your last sentence, which seems to imply that the UN has direct influence on Somalian law and/or government.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have no idea why you got modded up and GP down .
He was obviously referring only to Somalia with his remark about laissez faire capitalism .
There are FAIAP /no/ laws there.I am also confused by your last sentence , which seems to imply that the UN has direct influence on Somalian law and/or government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have no idea why you got modded up and GP down.
He was obviously referring only to Somalia with his remark about laissez faire capitalism.
There are FAIAP /no/ laws there.I am also confused by your last sentence, which seems to imply that the UN has direct influence on Somalian law and/or government.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293586</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>black3d</author>
	<datestamp>1259689740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess you're maybe going for a +funny mod, but its too subtle to be sure.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>In relation to the claim, pirates have been paying shares in rewards to their support groups for some time now. This appears to be simply formalising the process. This is real, and she WILL get her share.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess you 're maybe going for a + funny mod , but its too subtle to be sure .
; ) In relation to the claim , pirates have been paying shares in rewards to their support groups for some time now .
This appears to be simply formalising the process .
This is real , and she WILL get her share .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess you're maybe going for a +funny mod, but its too subtle to be sure.
;)In relation to the claim, pirates have been paying shares in rewards to their support groups for some time now.
This appears to be simply formalising the process.
This is real, and she WILL get her share.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293650</id>
	<title>Re:just bomb them</title>
	<author>A nonymous Coward</author>
	<datestamp>1259690220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How would it save any lives?  Very few hostages die.  That would be bad for business; pirates don't get ransom for dead crew or sunken ships, and if they tried to, their negotiating credibility wold sink just as fast.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How would it save any lives ?
Very few hostages die .
That would be bad for business ; pirates do n't get ransom for dead crew or sunken ships , and if they tried to , their negotiating credibility wold sink just as fast .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How would it save any lives?
Very few hostages die.
That would be bad for business; pirates don't get ransom for dead crew or sunken ships, and if they tried to, their negotiating credibility wold sink just as fast.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297210</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259596320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Replace "Banker" with "ACORN" and "Bank robbery" with "whorehouse" and you'll be just as accurate</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Replace " Banker " with " ACORN " and " Bank robbery " with " whorehouse " and you 'll be just as accurate</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Replace "Banker" with "ACORN" and "Bank robbery" with "whorehouse" and you'll be just as accurate</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295786</id>
	<title>Re:just bomb them</title>
	<author>j35ter</author>
	<datestamp>1259585460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...it would save many more lifes at the end.</p></div><p>Umm...how many hostages have been killed by the pirates to date? Whenever I hear something about the pirates, they only sum up the number of killed pirates!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...it would save many more lifes at the end.Umm...how many hostages have been killed by the pirates to date ?
Whenever I hear something about the pirates , they only sum up the number of killed pirates !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...it would save many more lifes at the end.Umm...how many hostages have been killed by the pirates to date?
Whenever I hear something about the pirates, they only sum up the number of killed pirates!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296946</id>
	<title>Alimony!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259594880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait....someone got an RPG as an alimony payment?!?!?!?</p><p>I think the NRA just got a new spokesperson!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait....someone got an RPG as an alimony payment ? ! ? ! ? !
? I think the NRA just got a new spokesperson !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait....someone got an RPG as an alimony payment?!?!?!
?I think the NRA just got a new spokesperson!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293872</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>Erinnys Tisiphone</author>
	<datestamp>1259691840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>That woman needs a Wikipedia for posterity's sake. All peoples' talk about globalization, and philosophy, and humanism seems pretty laughable - Sahra Ibrahim got a -R.P.G.- as divorce alimony. And then bet it on a pirate expedition. Is anybody else still working on this mental image? Pretty hard to comprehend from where we're sitting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That woman needs a Wikipedia for posterity 's sake .
All peoples ' talk about globalization , and philosophy , and humanism seems pretty laughable - Sahra Ibrahim got a -R.P.G.- as divorce alimony .
And then bet it on a pirate expedition .
Is anybody else still working on this mental image ?
Pretty hard to comprehend from where we 're sitting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That woman needs a Wikipedia for posterity's sake.
All peoples' talk about globalization, and philosophy, and humanism seems pretty laughable - Sahra Ibrahim got a -R.P.G.- as divorce alimony.
And then bet it on a pirate expedition.
Is anybody else still working on this mental image?
Pretty hard to comprehend from where we're sitting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293586</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30299188</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259605320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In a truly unregulated market the vessels losing millions of dollars would instead pay millions of dollars to have all of the pirates killed.</p></div><p>Millions of dollars just doesn't kill that many people anymore.  The Iraq war was billed as costing $6 billion, but it will be  a trillion when we are done with it.  And a lot of those combat troops are military--which means we get there services for a song because of patriotism and all that other good stuff.  A fully privately financed army capable of pacifying Somalia would be measured in hundreds of billions, if not trillions, of dollars.  It is cheaper to pay the ransom.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In a truly unregulated market the vessels losing millions of dollars would instead pay millions of dollars to have all of the pirates killed.Millions of dollars just does n't kill that many people anymore .
The Iraq war was billed as costing $ 6 billion , but it will be a trillion when we are done with it .
And a lot of those combat troops are military--which means we get there services for a song because of patriotism and all that other good stuff .
A fully privately financed army capable of pacifying Somalia would be measured in hundreds of billions , if not trillions , of dollars .
It is cheaper to pay the ransom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a truly unregulated market the vessels losing millions of dollars would instead pay millions of dollars to have all of the pirates killed.Millions of dollars just doesn't kill that many people anymore.
The Iraq war was billed as costing $6 billion, but it will be  a trillion when we are done with it.
And a lot of those combat troops are military--which means we get there services for a song because of patriotism and all that other good stuff.
A fully privately financed army capable of pacifying Somalia would be measured in hundreds of billions, if not trillions, of dollars.
It is cheaper to pay the ransom.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295624</id>
	<title>Business is complicated</title>
	<author>heidaro</author>
	<datestamp>1259583540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This says more about business rather than anything else. Even Somalian pirates can do it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This says more about business rather than anything else .
Even Somalian pirates can do it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This says more about business rather than anything else.
Even Somalian pirates can do it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296558</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>91degrees</author>
	<datestamp>1259592420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, I guess this is just the prisoners' dilemma.  She has no idea whether they'll pay.  However if they don't nobody will invest in pirates ever again.  If they do then she'll have established that they are trustworthy and it's in the pirates' interests to pay up if they ever want any more money.  <br> <br>
The first payment is the highest risk.  Has potential for huge rewards.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I guess this is just the prisoners ' dilemma .
She has no idea whether they 'll pay .
However if they do n't nobody will invest in pirates ever again .
If they do then she 'll have established that they are trustworthy and it 's in the pirates ' interests to pay up if they ever want any more money .
The first payment is the highest risk .
Has potential for huge rewards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I guess this is just the prisoners' dilemma.
She has no idea whether they'll pay.
However if they don't nobody will invest in pirates ever again.
If they do then she'll have established that they are trustworthy and it's in the pirates' interests to pay up if they ever want any more money.
The first payment is the highest risk.
Has potential for huge rewards.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294482</id>
	<title>Lloyds of Haradheere</title>
	<author>darinfp</author>
	<datestamp>1259611680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Welcome to 1688..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcome to 1688. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Welcome to 1688..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490</id>
	<title>That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>areusche</author>
	<datestamp>1259689080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They're freaking pirates! This woman is an idiot if she expects any money from this. It's not like she's seeding a movie!</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're freaking pirates !
This woman is an idiot if she expects any money from this .
It 's not like she 's seeding a movie !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're freaking pirates!
This woman is an idiot if she expects any money from this.
It's not like she's seeding a movie!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30300446</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>seh4</author>
	<datestamp>1259611080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Well it all depends on whether the Somali government will bail out the pirates. They'd better... I've got a <b>CDS</b> riding on the pirates not defaulting on this lady.</p></div><p>FTFY yvw</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well it all depends on whether the Somali government will bail out the pirates .
They 'd better... I 've got a CDS riding on the pirates not defaulting on this lady.FTFY yvw</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well it all depends on whether the Somali government will bail out the pirates.
They'd better... I've got a CDS riding on the pirates not defaulting on this lady.FTFY yvw
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293882</id>
	<title>Re:there's one born every minute</title>
	<author>nametaken</author>
	<datestamp>1259691900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This already happens.  If you'll recall the occasion recently, US Navy SEALS took some of these bastards to school.</p><p>In most cases ships will try to repel pirates with non-lethal technologies, which is god-damned retarded.  They need to send every one of these animals to the bottom of the ocean.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This already happens .
If you 'll recall the occasion recently , US Navy SEALS took some of these bastards to school.In most cases ships will try to repel pirates with non-lethal technologies , which is god-damned retarded .
They need to send every one of these animals to the bottom of the ocean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This already happens.
If you'll recall the occasion recently, US Navy SEALS took some of these bastards to school.In most cases ships will try to repel pirates with non-lethal technologies, which is god-damned retarded.
They need to send every one of these animals to the bottom of the ocean.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294438</id>
	<title>Re:Gunboat diplomacy</title>
	<author>asaz989</author>
	<datestamp>1259611380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nope - the only reason international vessels can shoot at pirates in international waters is because the various treaties governing the high seas explicitly authorize it. They say nothing about accomplices (you'd need a UNSC resolution to authorize that).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope - the only reason international vessels can shoot at pirates in international waters is because the various treaties governing the high seas explicitly authorize it .
They say nothing about accomplices ( you 'd need a UNSC resolution to authorize that ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope - the only reason international vessels can shoot at pirates in international waters is because the various treaties governing the high seas explicitly authorize it.
They say nothing about accomplices (you'd need a UNSC resolution to authorize that).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30298090</id>
	<title>In the words of Eddie Izzard...</title>
	<author>prezpwns</author>
	<datestamp>1259600520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To me it seems as though the world looks at criminals in a peculiar way -

"You kill one person, they give you X years in prison. Two or more, they look at you through a tiny window through a door. Someone's killed 100,000 people? We're almost going, "Well done! You killed 100,000 people? You must get up very early in the morning! I can't even get down the gym. Your diary must look odd: 'Get up in the morning, death, death, death, death, death, death, death &ndash; lunch &ndash; death, death, death &ndash; afternoon tea &ndash; death, death, death &ndash; quick shower ' "

To what extent do we allow these 'pirates' to organize and become stronger??</htmltext>
<tokenext>To me it seems as though the world looks at criminals in a peculiar way - " You kill one person , they give you X years in prison .
Two or more , they look at you through a tiny window through a door .
Someone 's killed 100,000 people ?
We 're almost going , " Well done !
You killed 100,000 people ?
You must get up very early in the morning !
I ca n't even get down the gym .
Your diary must look odd : 'Get up in the morning , death , death , death , death , death , death , death    lunch    death , death , death    afternoon tea    death , death , death    quick shower ' " To what extent do we allow these 'pirates ' to organize and become stronger ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To me it seems as though the world looks at criminals in a peculiar way -

"You kill one person, they give you X years in prison.
Two or more, they look at you through a tiny window through a door.
Someone's killed 100,000 people?
We're almost going, "Well done!
You killed 100,000 people?
You must get up very early in the morning!
I can't even get down the gym.
Your diary must look odd: 'Get up in the morning, death, death, death, death, death, death, death – lunch – death, death, death – afternoon tea – death, death, death – quick shower ' "

To what extent do we allow these 'pirates' to organize and become stronger?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295568</id>
	<title>Re:just bomb them</title>
	<author>polle404</author>
	<datestamp>1259582880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>not to mention the legalities concerning armaments in non-international waters, and the fact that using said armaments in non-international waters are constituted as an act of war, which concerns most nations a bit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>not to mention the legalities concerning armaments in non-international waters , and the fact that using said armaments in non-international waters are constituted as an act of war , which concerns most nations a bit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not to mention the legalities concerning armaments in non-international waters, and the fact that using said armaments in non-international waters are constituted as an act of war, which concerns most nations a bit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295144</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>Tom</author>
	<datestamp>1259577540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems that you're the idiot. For all we know, she <b>did</b> get her share.</p><p>And I'd be surprised if not. Criminal societies generally adhere more strongly to their codes of ethic than civil society. Because there are fewer other forces that bind them, and trust is more important.</p><p>And, of course, for the simple practical reason that if the guys want to get future investors for their next trips, they'd better build a reputation of actually paying them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems that you 're the idiot .
For all we know , she did get her share.And I 'd be surprised if not .
Criminal societies generally adhere more strongly to their codes of ethic than civil society .
Because there are fewer other forces that bind them , and trust is more important.And , of course , for the simple practical reason that if the guys want to get future investors for their next trips , they 'd better build a reputation of actually paying them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems that you're the idiot.
For all we know, she did get her share.And I'd be surprised if not.
Criminal societies generally adhere more strongly to their codes of ethic than civil society.
Because there are fewer other forces that bind them, and trust is more important.And, of course, for the simple practical reason that if the guys want to get future investors for their next trips, they'd better build a reputation of actually paying them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293800</id>
	<title>Re:This is a really bad idea</title>
	<author>Higaran</author>
	<datestamp>1259691300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dude, its Somolia, the only law there is who has a bigger gun or more ammo, and your right no country gives a crap.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , its Somolia , the only law there is who has a bigger gun or more ammo , and your right no country gives a crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, its Somolia, the only law there is who has a bigger gun or more ammo, and your right no country gives a crap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293612</id>
	<title>Sharing resources for a common goal?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259689980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like socialism to me...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like socialism to me.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like socialism to me...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30299716</id>
	<title>Re:Why is the world so soft on pirates?</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1259607600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Why don't other nations' militaries take a similar hard-line approach?<br>[...]<br>Heck, a single aircraft carrier in the region, launching planes to fly patrols which would respond to distress calls, would go a long way to securing the region. Why isn't this done?</p></div></blockquote><p>A single aircraft carrier might do that, but few countries in the world have aircraft carriers (the portion of the US navy dedicated to carrying Marine Corps forces, alone, has, IIRC, more and larger carriers than all navies outside the US combined, and that's not even counting the large carriers that are the main striking arm of the US navy.)</p><p>In fact, very few countries in the world have navies that are equipped for substantial operations outside their own immediate neighborhood in any form, and <i>even taking piracy in Somalia and elsewhere into account</i> few have any incentive to build one which warrants the cost.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't other nations ' militaries take a similar hard-line approach ? [ .. .
] Heck , a single aircraft carrier in the region , launching planes to fly patrols which would respond to distress calls , would go a long way to securing the region .
Why is n't this done ? A single aircraft carrier might do that , but few countries in the world have aircraft carriers ( the portion of the US navy dedicated to carrying Marine Corps forces , alone , has , IIRC , more and larger carriers than all navies outside the US combined , and that 's not even counting the large carriers that are the main striking arm of the US navy .
) In fact , very few countries in the world have navies that are equipped for substantial operations outside their own immediate neighborhood in any form , and even taking piracy in Somalia and elsewhere into account few have any incentive to build one which warrants the cost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't other nations' militaries take a similar hard-line approach?[...
]Heck, a single aircraft carrier in the region, launching planes to fly patrols which would respond to distress calls, would go a long way to securing the region.
Why isn't this done?A single aircraft carrier might do that, but few countries in the world have aircraft carriers (the portion of the US navy dedicated to carrying Marine Corps forces, alone, has, IIRC, more and larger carriers than all navies outside the US combined, and that's not even counting the large carriers that are the main striking arm of the US navy.
)In fact, very few countries in the world have navies that are equipped for substantial operations outside their own immediate neighborhood in any form, and even taking piracy in Somalia and elsewhere into account few have any incentive to build one which warrants the cost.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294990</id>
	<title>Patrols</title>
	<author>Gridpoet</author>
	<datestamp>1259575320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems to me the easiest way to deal with this is for the shipping companies to hire independent patrol ships, it wouldn't cost very much to be escorted through dangerous waters by an armed patrol boat that forms a safe perimeter around the ship...</p><p>this also has the added bonus of solving the problem of oil tankers not being able to have weapons fired on board due to the volatility of their cargo and it solves the problem of certain ports not allowing armed ships, the patrol boat simply anchors off shore in international waters and waits for the cargo ship to re-embark.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems to me the easiest way to deal with this is for the shipping companies to hire independent patrol ships , it would n't cost very much to be escorted through dangerous waters by an armed patrol boat that forms a safe perimeter around the ship...this also has the added bonus of solving the problem of oil tankers not being able to have weapons fired on board due to the volatility of their cargo and it solves the problem of certain ports not allowing armed ships , the patrol boat simply anchors off shore in international waters and waits for the cargo ship to re-embark .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems to me the easiest way to deal with this is for the shipping companies to hire independent patrol ships, it wouldn't cost very much to be escorted through dangerous waters by an armed patrol boat that forms a safe perimeter around the ship...this also has the added bonus of solving the problem of oil tankers not being able to have weapons fired on board due to the volatility of their cargo and it solves the problem of certain ports not allowing armed ships, the patrol boat simply anchors off shore in international waters and waits for the cargo ship to re-embark.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296886</id>
	<title>There is a way to avoid it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259594460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Use<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET trading platform and this stock exchange won't last too much<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Use .NET trading platform and this stock exchange wo n't last too much : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use .NET trading platform and this stock exchange won't last too much :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294534</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>Albertosaurus</author>
	<datestamp>1259612280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is unregulated laissez faire capitalism at its finest.</p></div><p>Don't be absurd.  In laissez faire capitalism the shipping companies would be free to arm their vessels and hire guards to protect themselves from predation.  Due to current international treaties, they cannot do this, thus creating an extremely uneven playing field.

What this is instead, is

A) Yet another example of the fallacy of unilateral disarmament.
B) Yet another example of the fallacy of entrusting the defense of your life, liberty and property to the state.

Think of it as a school that will suspend you for fighting should you choose to defend yourself against the bully who wants your lunch money.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is unregulated laissez faire capitalism at its finest.Do n't be absurd .
In laissez faire capitalism the shipping companies would be free to arm their vessels and hire guards to protect themselves from predation .
Due to current international treaties , they can not do this , thus creating an extremely uneven playing field .
What this is instead , is A ) Yet another example of the fallacy of unilateral disarmament .
B ) Yet another example of the fallacy of entrusting the defense of your life , liberty and property to the state .
Think of it as a school that will suspend you for fighting should you choose to defend yourself against the bully who wants your lunch money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is unregulated laissez faire capitalism at its finest.Don't be absurd.
In laissez faire capitalism the shipping companies would be free to arm their vessels and hire guards to protect themselves from predation.
Due to current international treaties, they cannot do this, thus creating an extremely uneven playing field.
What this is instead, is

A) Yet another example of the fallacy of unilateral disarmament.
B) Yet another example of the fallacy of entrusting the defense of your life, liberty and property to the state.
Think of it as a school that will suspend you for fighting should you choose to defend yourself against the bully who wants your lunch money.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293844</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>jeffrey.endres</author>
	<datestamp>1259691660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's obviously not rule of law.</p></div><p>And what are regulations if not laws?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's obviously not rule of law.And what are regulations if not laws ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's obviously not rule of law.And what are regulations if not laws?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30307374</id>
	<title>Out of town on a rail</title>
	<author>ebvwfbw</author>
	<datestamp>1259600700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have her payoff.  Ride her out of town on a rail, then hang her.  Hang her high.  Then go after the pirates for a few dollars more.  Same thing, rail then hang them.  Take pictures. Post them on facebook - the good (Victims), the bad (Pirates) and the ugly (Politicians that do nothing, "Oh, don't kill them").</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have her payoff .
Ride her out of town on a rail , then hang her .
Hang her high .
Then go after the pirates for a few dollars more .
Same thing , rail then hang them .
Take pictures .
Post them on facebook - the good ( Victims ) , the bad ( Pirates ) and the ugly ( Politicians that do nothing , " Oh , do n't kill them " ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have her payoff.
Ride her out of town on a rail, then hang her.
Hang her high.
Then go after the pirates for a few dollars more.
Same thing, rail then hang them.
Take pictures.
Post them on facebook - the good (Victims), the bad (Pirates) and the ugly (Politicians that do nothing, "Oh, don't kill them").</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293868</id>
	<title>Re:This is a really bad idea</title>
	<author>DaMattster</author>
	<datestamp>1259691780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If this is in international waters, then it stands to reason that killing the pirates would be perfectly legal!  I hate to sound crass, but, "Target practice, anyone?"  It is one thing to aid a starving or sick person and I am all for that and would gladly assist a Somali boat that flies a distress signal.  But pirates wreck havoc for all.  Just think of the Maersk crew that nearly perished during a heist.  On top of that, the pirates were amped up on khat, an amphetamine making them even more unpredictable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this is in international waters , then it stands to reason that killing the pirates would be perfectly legal !
I hate to sound crass , but , " Target practice , anyone ?
" It is one thing to aid a starving or sick person and I am all for that and would gladly assist a Somali boat that flies a distress signal .
But pirates wreck havoc for all .
Just think of the Maersk crew that nearly perished during a heist .
On top of that , the pirates were amped up on khat , an amphetamine making them even more unpredictable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this is in international waters, then it stands to reason that killing the pirates would be perfectly legal!
I hate to sound crass, but, "Target practice, anyone?
"  It is one thing to aid a starving or sick person and I am all for that and would gladly assist a Somali boat that flies a distress signal.
But pirates wreck havoc for all.
Just think of the Maersk crew that nearly perished during a heist.
On top of that, the pirates were amped up on khat, an amphetamine making them even more unpredictable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296092</id>
	<title>Re:Meeting Places Make Excellent Drone Targets</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259588820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These Somalis are more like Americans than I think you realize.</p><p>Both Somalis and Americans live in a nation where manufacturing jobs are now non-existent.</p><p>Both Somalis and Americans live in a nation where education is considered a worthless pursuit.</p><p>Both Somalis and Americans have an utter love for weapons, destruction and killing.</p><p>Both Somalis and Americans address their own lack of ability to produce anything of value by attacking others, and taking their resources (oil from Iraq, for instance).</p><p>You guys actually have a lot in common. You'd probably be pretty good friends with a Somali pirate. You seem to share their lust for violence and the murder of innocent civilians.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These Somalis are more like Americans than I think you realize.Both Somalis and Americans live in a nation where manufacturing jobs are now non-existent.Both Somalis and Americans live in a nation where education is considered a worthless pursuit.Both Somalis and Americans have an utter love for weapons , destruction and killing.Both Somalis and Americans address their own lack of ability to produce anything of value by attacking others , and taking their resources ( oil from Iraq , for instance ) .You guys actually have a lot in common .
You 'd probably be pretty good friends with a Somali pirate .
You seem to share their lust for violence and the murder of innocent civilians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These Somalis are more like Americans than I think you realize.Both Somalis and Americans live in a nation where manufacturing jobs are now non-existent.Both Somalis and Americans live in a nation where education is considered a worthless pursuit.Both Somalis and Americans have an utter love for weapons, destruction and killing.Both Somalis and Americans address their own lack of ability to produce anything of value by attacking others, and taking their resources (oil from Iraq, for instance).You guys actually have a lot in common.
You'd probably be pretty good friends with a Somali pirate.
You seem to share their lust for violence and the murder of innocent civilians.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30298166</id>
	<title>screw college</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259600820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>well screw college I'm gonna be a pirate!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>well screw college I 'm gon na be a pirate !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well screw college I'm gonna be a pirate!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30298356</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>yuhong</author>
	<datestamp>1259601720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yep, it is listed in FSF's list of confusing or loaded words:
<a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Piracy" title="gnu.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Piracy</a> [gnu.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , it is listed in FSF 's list of confusing or loaded words : http : //www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html # Piracy [ gnu.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, it is listed in FSF's list of confusing or loaded words:
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Piracy [gnu.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294792</id>
	<title>Bomb them.</title>
	<author>CountBrass</author>
	<datestamp>1259572440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clearly it's public knowledge where these pirate nests are so why haven't they been bombed and napalmed to dust?</p><p>None of the people there are innocent not even the supplier of RPGs that is so happy she's gotten $78,000 as a result of terrorism, extortion and kidnapping.</p><p>I'd be prepared to 'invest' in a bombing run by a single fighter-bomber even if I got no return.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly it 's public knowledge where these pirate nests are so why have n't they been bombed and napalmed to dust ? None of the people there are innocent not even the supplier of RPGs that is so happy she 's gotten $ 78,000 as a result of terrorism , extortion and kidnapping.I 'd be prepared to 'invest ' in a bombing run by a single fighter-bomber even if I got no return .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly it's public knowledge where these pirate nests are so why haven't they been bombed and napalmed to dust?None of the people there are innocent not even the supplier of RPGs that is so happy she's gotten $78,000 as a result of terrorism, extortion and kidnapping.I'd be prepared to 'invest' in a bombing run by a single fighter-bomber even if I got no return.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297364</id>
	<title>New way to destroy pirates!</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1259596980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let Wall Street at them... soon they will be trading Rum Derivatives or some such BS, and what is more risky business than freaking being a pirate... then comes the debt collapse... Unfortunately they will likely rule that the pirates of an entire nation are too big to fail, and will get a bailout... which will artificially keep them afloat (pardon the pun)... people will scream about regulation, but the pirates will drown (pardon the pun again... geez!) out the naysayers with "Yo Ho Hos" and "Shiver Me Timbers", and eventually it will all happen again.</p><p>Wait, what were we talking about again...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let Wall Street at them... soon they will be trading Rum Derivatives or some such BS , and what is more risky business than freaking being a pirate... then comes the debt collapse... Unfortunately they will likely rule that the pirates of an entire nation are too big to fail , and will get a bailout... which will artificially keep them afloat ( pardon the pun ) ... people will scream about regulation , but the pirates will drown ( pardon the pun again.. .
geez ! ) out the naysayers with " Yo Ho Hos " and " Shiver Me Timbers " , and eventually it will all happen again.Wait , what were we talking about again.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let Wall Street at them... soon they will be trading Rum Derivatives or some such BS, and what is more risky business than freaking being a pirate... then comes the debt collapse... Unfortunately they will likely rule that the pirates of an entire nation are too big to fail, and will get a bailout... which will artificially keep them afloat (pardon the pun)... people will scream about regulation, but the pirates will drown (pardon the pun again...
geez!) out the naysayers with "Yo Ho Hos" and "Shiver Me Timbers", and eventually it will all happen again.Wait, what were we talking about again...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294286</id>
	<title>Re:Why not?</title>
	<author>Spikeles</author>
	<datestamp>1259696160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's really quite a good quote, let me try:<p><div class="quote"><p>Legitimacy as a <b>religion</b> seems to be determined by how well you succeed and how long you've been around, more than your morals or ethics.</p></div><p>Ha, it fits!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's really quite a good quote , let me try : Legitimacy as a religion seems to be determined by how well you succeed and how long you 've been around , more than your morals or ethics.Ha , it fits !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's really quite a good quote, let me try:Legitimacy as a religion seems to be determined by how well you succeed and how long you've been around, more than your morals or ethics.Ha, it fits!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297614</id>
	<title>Wait... RPG? As alimony?!</title>
	<author>GlowinOrb</author>
	<datestamp>1259598240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"I am waiting for my share after I contributed a rocket-propelled grenade for the operation,' she said, adding that she got the weapon from her ex-husband in alimony."  Forget about the pirates, where the hell does one get a RPG as part of a divorce settlement.  If you're dividing the family arsenal of military grade weaponry during the divorce, investing in a pirate cartel probably seems down right normal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I am waiting for my share after I contributed a rocket-propelled grenade for the operation, ' she said , adding that she got the weapon from her ex-husband in alimony .
" Forget about the pirates , where the hell does one get a RPG as part of a divorce settlement .
If you 're dividing the family arsenal of military grade weaponry during the divorce , investing in a pirate cartel probably seems down right normal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I am waiting for my share after I contributed a rocket-propelled grenade for the operation,' she said, adding that she got the weapon from her ex-husband in alimony.
"  Forget about the pirates, where the hell does one get a RPG as part of a divorce settlement.
If you're dividing the family arsenal of military grade weaponry during the divorce, investing in a pirate cartel probably seems down right normal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296032</id>
	<title>Re:Why not?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259588220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So if the Somalias (sp?) put together a government by hook or crook or democratic election. That government could meet your subjective criteria of being "functional". That government supported the current pirates and delegated them some authority like Port inspector, Coast Guard, Navel Customs and tax collection- then they would be legitimate because there is a government involved?</p><p>Government doesn't make everything legit in my book, plenty of actions -even sponsored by civilized governments- can still be tribal raiding parties.</p><p>It is you who are not so much willfully blind but appear to have a huge blind spot for anything done under cover of "legitimate" authority. You might want to learn to see around your blind spots.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So if the Somalias ( sp ?
) put together a government by hook or crook or democratic election .
That government could meet your subjective criteria of being " functional " .
That government supported the current pirates and delegated them some authority like Port inspector , Coast Guard , Navel Customs and tax collection- then they would be legitimate because there is a government involved ? Government does n't make everything legit in my book , plenty of actions -even sponsored by civilized governments- can still be tribal raiding parties.It is you who are not so much willfully blind but appear to have a huge blind spot for anything done under cover of " legitimate " authority .
You might want to learn to see around your blind spots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if the Somalias (sp?
) put together a government by hook or crook or democratic election.
That government could meet your subjective criteria of being "functional".
That government supported the current pirates and delegated them some authority like Port inspector, Coast Guard, Navel Customs and tax collection- then they would be legitimate because there is a government involved?Government doesn't make everything legit in my book, plenty of actions -even sponsored by civilized governments- can still be tribal raiding parties.It is you who are not so much willfully blind but appear to have a huge blind spot for anything done under cover of "legitimate" authority.
You might want to learn to see around your blind spots.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295674</id>
	<title>Re:Why not?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259584140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I seriously don't understand how these people are still alive.  First off, Blackwater is looking for a new gig since the pee-pee whacking in Iraq.  Paying them to sit on the boat is got to be way cheaper than the ransom.  Secondly, why isn't every single Somali Pirate dead?  Do we not have the stomach to do what is needed here?  Why haven't we destroyed their coastline, smashed their boats, and made it impossible to pursue piracy?</p><p>If I were in charge of even a minor country, I would stand my soldiers shoulder to shoulder across that country's northern border and make them walk to the southern border, leaving nothing alive in their path.  Nothing. No trees, no animals, no plants, no vegetation of any kind.  Nothing.    I'd have them salt the earth and poison the wells.   The only thing that would thrive would be the vultures.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I seriously do n't understand how these people are still alive .
First off , Blackwater is looking for a new gig since the pee-pee whacking in Iraq .
Paying them to sit on the boat is got to be way cheaper than the ransom .
Secondly , why is n't every single Somali Pirate dead ?
Do we not have the stomach to do what is needed here ?
Why have n't we destroyed their coastline , smashed their boats , and made it impossible to pursue piracy ? If I were in charge of even a minor country , I would stand my soldiers shoulder to shoulder across that country 's northern border and make them walk to the southern border , leaving nothing alive in their path .
Nothing. No trees , no animals , no plants , no vegetation of any kind .
Nothing. I 'd have them salt the earth and poison the wells .
The only thing that would thrive would be the vultures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I seriously don't understand how these people are still alive.
First off, Blackwater is looking for a new gig since the pee-pee whacking in Iraq.
Paying them to sit on the boat is got to be way cheaper than the ransom.
Secondly, why isn't every single Somali Pirate dead?
Do we not have the stomach to do what is needed here?
Why haven't we destroyed their coastline, smashed their boats, and made it impossible to pursue piracy?If I were in charge of even a minor country, I would stand my soldiers shoulder to shoulder across that country's northern border and make them walk to the southern border, leaving nothing alive in their path.
Nothing. No trees, no animals, no plants, no vegetation of any kind.
Nothing.    I'd have them salt the earth and poison the wells.
The only thing that would thrive would be the vultures.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294722</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>fractoid</author>
	<datestamp>1259614500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If Banker works for a different bank than the one that Pirate is going to rob, it sounds like a solid business proposition indeed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If Banker works for a different bank than the one that Pirate is going to rob , it sounds like a solid business proposition indeed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Banker works for a different bank than the one that Pirate is going to rob, it sounds like a solid business proposition indeed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293572</id>
	<title>Gunboat diplomacy</title>
	<author>martijnd</author>
	<datestamp>1259689680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry to tell the investors this -- but since they are now all complicit in murder,piracy and being (registered) members of a criminal organization this more or less legally opens them up to off-shore shelling by naval warships.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry to tell the investors this -- but since they are now all complicit in murder,piracy and being ( registered ) members of a criminal organization this more or less legally opens them up to off-shore shelling by naval warships .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry to tell the investors this -- but since they are now all complicit in murder,piracy and being (registered) members of a criminal organization this more or less legally opens them up to off-shore shelling by naval warships.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293908</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259692140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unregulated laissez faire capitalism doesn't include taking your competitors money at gunpoint.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unregulated laissez faire capitalism does n't include taking your competitors money at gunpoint .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unregulated laissez faire capitalism doesn't include taking your competitors money at gunpoint.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30305086</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>Joebert</author>
	<datestamp>1259584320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>They're freaking pirates! This woman is an idiot if she expects any money from this. It's not like she's seeding a movie!</p></div> </blockquote><p>

I was thinking the same thing. I couldn't help but think about having someone in the street tell me they'll give me $1000 if I let them borrow my gun so they can rob someone real quick, only to do so and find out the person they're robbing is me.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're freaking pirates !
This woman is an idiot if she expects any money from this .
It 's not like she 's seeding a movie !
I was thinking the same thing .
I could n't help but think about having someone in the street tell me they 'll give me $ 1000 if I let them borrow my gun so they can rob someone real quick , only to do so and find out the person they 're robbing is me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're freaking pirates!
This woman is an idiot if she expects any money from this.
It's not like she's seeding a movie!
I was thinking the same thing.
I couldn't help but think about having someone in the street tell me they'll give me $1000 if I let them borrow my gun so they can rob someone real quick, only to do so and find out the person they're robbing is me.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294654</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259613720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"You must be a pirate for the pirate's code to apply and you're not. And thirdly, the code is more what you'd call "guidelines" than actual rules. Welcome aboard the Black Pearl, Miss Turner."</p><p>Oh! Wait, she isn't Ms. Turner by any chance is she ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" You must be a pirate for the pirate 's code to apply and you 're not .
And thirdly , the code is more what you 'd call " guidelines " than actual rules .
Welcome aboard the Black Pearl , Miss Turner. " Oh !
Wait , she is n't Ms. Turner by any chance is she ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You must be a pirate for the pirate's code to apply and you're not.
And thirdly, the code is more what you'd call "guidelines" than actual rules.
Welcome aboard the Black Pearl, Miss Turner."Oh!
Wait, she isn't Ms. Turner by any chance is she ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295908</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259586720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like the way you are arguing that international law should be changed to match the legal system of Somalia.</p><p>Except not really.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like the way you are arguing that international law should be changed to match the legal system of Somalia.Except not really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like the way you are arguing that international law should be changed to match the legal system of Somalia.Except not really.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293898</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>Cabriel</author>
	<datestamp>1259692020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, how long do you think it will be until they rewrite the history books and become the freedom fighters who put down the unlawful regime?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , how long do you think it will be until they rewrite the history books and become the freedom fighters who put down the unlawful regime ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, how long do you think it will be until they rewrite the history books and become the freedom fighters who put down the unlawful regime?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30299472</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1259606580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The pirates are, of course, violent organized criminals engaging in crimes mostly directed at foreigners. OTOH, if they stiff the people in their "investing" program, they dry up that well of support -- also, they they poison their relation with the local populace, make themselves more isolated, and easier targets for outside intervention.</p><p>So, sure, one should expect the pirates to operate out of self-interest. However, that doesn't necessarily mean <i>not</i> rewarding their "investors".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The pirates are , of course , violent organized criminals engaging in crimes mostly directed at foreigners .
OTOH , if they stiff the people in their " investing " program , they dry up that well of support -- also , they they poison their relation with the local populace , make themselves more isolated , and easier targets for outside intervention.So , sure , one should expect the pirates to operate out of self-interest .
However , that does n't necessarily mean not rewarding their " investors " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The pirates are, of course, violent organized criminals engaging in crimes mostly directed at foreigners.
OTOH, if they stiff the people in their "investing" program, they dry up that well of support -- also, they they poison their relation with the local populace, make themselves more isolated, and easier targets for outside intervention.So, sure, one should expect the pirates to operate out of self-interest.
However, that doesn't necessarily mean not rewarding their "investors".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293512</id>
	<title>Perhaps</title>
	<author>nightfire-unique</author>
	<datestamp>1259689200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps we can send some folks from the BSA and RIAA over there to educate them about <i>actual, real piracy</i>.  Might help them to stop confusing the term with copyright infringement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps we can send some folks from the BSA and RIAA over there to educate them about actual , real piracy .
Might help them to stop confusing the term with copyright infringement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps we can send some folks from the BSA and RIAA over there to educate them about actual, real piracy.
Might help them to stop confusing the term with copyright infringement.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30299014</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259604600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It sounds like modern pirates appear to follow fairly similar rules, which makes for some interesting cognitive dissonance in those who romanticize the old-school version but demonize the Somali version.</p></div><p>Oh come on.  Dissonance?  What dissonance?  If and only if you've got the panache to hoist the Jolly Rogers and sing "yo ho ho and a bottle of rum" then you're a romantic pirate.  Simple.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It sounds like modern pirates appear to follow fairly similar rules , which makes for some interesting cognitive dissonance in those who romanticize the old-school version but demonize the Somali version.Oh come on .
Dissonance ? What dissonance ?
If and only if you 've got the panache to hoist the Jolly Rogers and sing " yo ho ho and a bottle of rum " then you 're a romantic pirate .
Simple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It sounds like modern pirates appear to follow fairly similar rules, which makes for some interesting cognitive dissonance in those who romanticize the old-school version but demonize the Somali version.Oh come on.
Dissonance?  What dissonance?
If and only if you've got the panache to hoist the Jolly Rogers and sing "yo ho ho and a bottle of rum" then you're a romantic pirate.
Simple.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297656</id>
	<title>Re:Also saving the environment</title>
	<author>Taibhsear</author>
	<datestamp>1259598420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually I heard it was the <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2498206364209961454#" title="google.com">Crimson Permanent Assurance</a> [google.com] that was joining the fleet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually I heard it was the Crimson Permanent Assurance [ google.com ] that was joining the fleet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually I heard it was the Crimson Permanent Assurance [google.com] that was joining the fleet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294086</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>jftitan</author>
	<datestamp>1259694000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So pirates are more honest than bankers/stock investers/politicians?</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; That i can believe in!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So pirates are more honest than bankers/stock investers/politicians ?
    That i can believe in !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So pirates are more honest than bankers/stock investers/politicians?
    That i can believe in!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294230</id>
	<title>Meeting Places Make Excellent Drone Targets</title>
	<author>CodeBuster</author>
	<datestamp>1259695680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hmmm...Perhaps we could "invest" a couple of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-114\_Hellfire" title="wikipedia.org">helfire</a> [wikipedia.org] missiles for their next trading session, they really "bring down the house" as they say. Seriously though, now we have women and non-combatants supplying weapons to the pirates. Can someone else please explain why the navies of the world haven't parked offshore and leveled the pirate towns with naval artillery? Its too bad that the United States doesn't keep those <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iowa\_class" title="wikipedia.org">Iowa class battleships</a> [wikipedia.org] on the active registry anymore, a few hours of shelling from one of those and any pirate town would be a smoking ruin.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmmm...Perhaps we could " invest " a couple of helfire [ wikipedia.org ] missiles for their next trading session , they really " bring down the house " as they say .
Seriously though , now we have women and non-combatants supplying weapons to the pirates .
Can someone else please explain why the navies of the world have n't parked offshore and leveled the pirate towns with naval artillery ?
Its too bad that the United States does n't keep those Iowa class battleships [ wikipedia.org ] on the active registry anymore , a few hours of shelling from one of those and any pirate town would be a smoking ruin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmmm...Perhaps we could "invest" a couple of helfire [wikipedia.org] missiles for their next trading session, they really "bring down the house" as they say.
Seriously though, now we have women and non-combatants supplying weapons to the pirates.
Can someone else please explain why the navies of the world haven't parked offshore and leveled the pirate towns with naval artillery?
Its too bad that the United States doesn't keep those Iowa class battleships [wikipedia.org] on the active registry anymore, a few hours of shelling from one of those and any pirate town would be a smoking ruin.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30308790</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>Carewolf</author>
	<datestamp>1259839440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pirate: I'd like to borrow some money.<br>Banker: For what?<br>Pirate: I'm planning to invest in an unstable pyramid scheme. The return on your investment will be considerable.<br>Banker: That sounds reasonable...</p><p>Now, replace Pirate with a large percentage of the western population.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pirate : I 'd like to borrow some money.Banker : For what ? Pirate : I 'm planning to invest in an unstable pyramid scheme .
The return on your investment will be considerable.Banker : That sounds reasonable...Now , replace Pirate with a large percentage of the western population .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pirate: I'd like to borrow some money.Banker: For what?Pirate: I'm planning to invest in an unstable pyramid scheme.
The return on your investment will be considerable.Banker: That sounds reasonable...Now, replace Pirate with a large percentage of the western population.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293992</id>
	<title>It's no different from any other raiding culture.</title>
	<author>Valdrax</author>
	<datestamp>1259692980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They're freaking pirates! This woman is an idiot if she expects any money from this. It's not like she's seeding a movie!</p></div><p>One man's pirate is another's Robin Hood of the High Seas.</p><p>It's not necessarily true that you should expect a person who commits some crimes against some people (even violent crimes) to commit any crime against any person.  Cultures across human history have survived off of raiding fat, rich neighbors and have not collapsed due to infighting and lack of ability to trust your neighbor.  These "stock exchanges" were people contribute weapons for money are not necessarily any less reliable than a Scythian making a family member a good saddle before they rode off to sack the Romans, hoping for a cut of the pillage.  People can be utterly trustworthy to their neighbors while being utter bastards to outsiders.  It's really the historical norm.</p><p>Now, if these people were criminals that attacked their <em>own</em> people, then it would be pretty strange to expect fair dealing, but as long as "investors" and "entrepreneurs" see themselves as part of the same group, then there's no reason for an "investor" to expect to be treated as poorly as the pirates' victims.  After all, they aren't "criminals" within their community.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're freaking pirates !
This woman is an idiot if she expects any money from this .
It 's not like she 's seeding a movie ! One man 's pirate is another 's Robin Hood of the High Seas.It 's not necessarily true that you should expect a person who commits some crimes against some people ( even violent crimes ) to commit any crime against any person .
Cultures across human history have survived off of raiding fat , rich neighbors and have not collapsed due to infighting and lack of ability to trust your neighbor .
These " stock exchanges " were people contribute weapons for money are not necessarily any less reliable than a Scythian making a family member a good saddle before they rode off to sack the Romans , hoping for a cut of the pillage .
People can be utterly trustworthy to their neighbors while being utter bastards to outsiders .
It 's really the historical norm.Now , if these people were criminals that attacked their own people , then it would be pretty strange to expect fair dealing , but as long as " investors " and " entrepreneurs " see themselves as part of the same group , then there 's no reason for an " investor " to expect to be treated as poorly as the pirates ' victims .
After all , they are n't " criminals " within their community .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're freaking pirates!
This woman is an idiot if she expects any money from this.
It's not like she's seeding a movie!One man's pirate is another's Robin Hood of the High Seas.It's not necessarily true that you should expect a person who commits some crimes against some people (even violent crimes) to commit any crime against any person.
Cultures across human history have survived off of raiding fat, rich neighbors and have not collapsed due to infighting and lack of ability to trust your neighbor.
These "stock exchanges" were people contribute weapons for money are not necessarily any less reliable than a Scythian making a family member a good saddle before they rode off to sack the Romans, hoping for a cut of the pillage.
People can be utterly trustworthy to their neighbors while being utter bastards to outsiders.
It's really the historical norm.Now, if these people were criminals that attacked their own people, then it would be pretty strange to expect fair dealing, but as long as "investors" and "entrepreneurs" see themselves as part of the same group, then there's no reason for an "investor" to expect to be treated as poorly as the pirates' victims.
After all, they aren't "criminals" within their community.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294172</id>
	<title>Re:there's one born every minute</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259694840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its the new Nigerian scams.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its the new Nigerian scams .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its the new Nigerian scams.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294264</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259696040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>At first, I read that as "Let's teach the somalians what piracy is, by sending out an RIAA indoctrination squad"</htmltext>
<tokenext>At first , I read that as " Let 's teach the somalians what piracy is , by sending out an RIAA indoctrination squad "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At first, I read that as "Let's teach the somalians what piracy is, by sending out an RIAA indoctrination squad"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294738</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259571600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>exactly!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>exactly ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>exactly!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296090</id>
	<title>Re:Why not?</title>
	<author>(arg!)Styopa</author>
	<datestamp>1259588820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fail 1) who EVER said corporate legitimacy had anything to do with morals or ethics?  Ever?  Corporate success is measured in return on investment for shareholders.  Full stop.  Naturally, such an organism will try whatever options are available (generally legal, but illegal if the odds of getting caught/punished/whatever are calculably trivial) to succeed.</p><p>Fail 2) equating the actions of a mercantilist cartel formed in the 16th-17th Century with the conduct of pirates in 2009.  I'm not sure if that's a failure in moral equivalence (in ENTIRELY different contexts) or if it's historical ignorance or if it's simply political disingenuousness, but it hardly even makes SENSE, even at the most superficial levels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fail 1 ) who EVER said corporate legitimacy had anything to do with morals or ethics ?
Ever ? Corporate success is measured in return on investment for shareholders .
Full stop .
Naturally , such an organism will try whatever options are available ( generally legal , but illegal if the odds of getting caught/punished/whatever are calculably trivial ) to succeed.Fail 2 ) equating the actions of a mercantilist cartel formed in the 16th-17th Century with the conduct of pirates in 2009 .
I 'm not sure if that 's a failure in moral equivalence ( in ENTIRELY different contexts ) or if it 's historical ignorance or if it 's simply political disingenuousness , but it hardly even makes SENSE , even at the most superficial levels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fail 1) who EVER said corporate legitimacy had anything to do with morals or ethics?
Ever?  Corporate success is measured in return on investment for shareholders.
Full stop.
Naturally, such an organism will try whatever options are available (generally legal, but illegal if the odds of getting caught/punished/whatever are calculably trivial) to succeed.Fail 2) equating the actions of a mercantilist cartel formed in the 16th-17th Century with the conduct of pirates in 2009.
I'm not sure if that's a failure in moral equivalence (in ENTIRELY different contexts) or if it's historical ignorance or if it's simply political disingenuousness, but it hardly even makes SENSE, even at the most superficial levels.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296426</id>
	<title>A fund, not an exchange</title>
	<author>C\_Kode</author>
	<datestamp>1259591580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This would be classified as a fund, not an exchange.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This would be classified as a fund , not an exchange .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would be classified as a fund, not an exchange.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296180</id>
	<title>Re:Why not?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259589480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nope legitimacy as a company is determined by how much money you make for yourself, subsidiaries and your boss</p><p>And if you wanna talk piracy check the Dutch West Indies company (sorry no wiki link, the article is sadly brief and inaccurate). Now those were pirates. The Dutch East Indies company did do some trade once in a while</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope legitimacy as a company is determined by how much money you make for yourself , subsidiaries and your bossAnd if you wan na talk piracy check the Dutch West Indies company ( sorry no wiki link , the article is sadly brief and inaccurate ) .
Now those were pirates .
The Dutch East Indies company did do some trade once in a while</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope legitimacy as a company is determined by how much money you make for yourself, subsidiaries and your bossAnd if you wanna talk piracy check the Dutch West Indies company (sorry no wiki link, the article is sadly brief and inaccurate).
Now those were pirates.
The Dutch East Indies company did do some trade once in a while</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295094</id>
	<title>Away with the lies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259576760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the article: "The district gets a percentage of every ransom from ships that have been released, and that goes on public infrastructure, including our hospital and our public schools."</p><p>So let me get this straight: a group of armed somalis are using force to obtain property from passing ships, and then use the loot to fund public infrastructure and reward investors.<br>And that's supposed to be shocking? It's just the birth of a state. Replace "ransom" with "tax", "pirates" with "tax collectors", "somali gangs" with "somali government", "investors" with "lobbies" or "activists" or "unions", and you'll see reality a bit more clearly. The same is going on in every country in the world, except that in this case the lies are gone and you get to see a glimpse of reality. Embrace it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : " The district gets a percentage of every ransom from ships that have been released , and that goes on public infrastructure , including our hospital and our public schools .
" So let me get this straight : a group of armed somalis are using force to obtain property from passing ships , and then use the loot to fund public infrastructure and reward investors.And that 's supposed to be shocking ?
It 's just the birth of a state .
Replace " ransom " with " tax " , " pirates " with " tax collectors " , " somali gangs " with " somali government " , " investors " with " lobbies " or " activists " or " unions " , and you 'll see reality a bit more clearly .
The same is going on in every country in the world , except that in this case the lies are gone and you get to see a glimpse of reality .
Embrace it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article: "The district gets a percentage of every ransom from ships that have been released, and that goes on public infrastructure, including our hospital and our public schools.
"So let me get this straight: a group of armed somalis are using force to obtain property from passing ships, and then use the loot to fund public infrastructure and reward investors.And that's supposed to be shocking?
It's just the birth of a state.
Replace "ransom" with "tax", "pirates" with "tax collectors", "somali gangs" with "somali government", "investors" with "lobbies" or "activists" or "unions", and you'll see reality a bit more clearly.
The same is going on in every country in the world, except that in this case the lies are gone and you get to see a glimpse of reality.
Embrace it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295344</id>
	<title>Re:Why not?</title>
	<author>mister\_playboy</author>
	<datestamp>1259580060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe you think that made what the DEIC did moral and/or ethical... but I don't.</p><p>Greed is greed.  I don't care whether it's legal or not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe you think that made what the DEIC did moral and/or ethical... but I do n't.Greed is greed .
I do n't care whether it 's legal or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe you think that made what the DEIC did moral and/or ethical... but I don't.Greed is greed.
I don't care whether it's legal or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293504</id>
	<title>Silly girl...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259689140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>'I am really happy and lucky. I have made $75,000 in only 38 days since I joined the "company."' -- Piracy investor Sahra Ibrahim</p></div><p>She's sowing the wind.  Wouldn't want to be her come reap-time.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>'I am really happy and lucky .
I have made $ 75,000 in only 38 days since I joined the " company .
" ' -- Piracy investor Sahra IbrahimShe 's sowing the wind .
Would n't want to be her come reap-time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'I am really happy and lucky.
I have made $75,000 in only 38 days since I joined the "company.
"' -- Piracy investor Sahra IbrahimShe's sowing the wind.
Wouldn't want to be her come reap-time.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293742</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259691000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is unregulated laissez faire capitalism at its finest. I'm so proud, little Somolia is growing up.</p></div><p>Wrong. There is partial regulation.</p><p>In a truly unregulated market the vessels losing millions of dollars would instead pay millions of dollars to have all of the pirates killed.</p><p>But they cannot do that because they are regulated.</p><p>This is nothing more than an example of uneven regulation (which is usually a sign of corruption, I'm looking at you united nations).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is unregulated laissez faire capitalism at its finest .
I 'm so proud , little Somolia is growing up.Wrong .
There is partial regulation.In a truly unregulated market the vessels losing millions of dollars would instead pay millions of dollars to have all of the pirates killed.But they can not do that because they are regulated.This is nothing more than an example of uneven regulation ( which is usually a sign of corruption , I 'm looking at you united nations ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is unregulated laissez faire capitalism at its finest.
I'm so proud, little Somolia is growing up.Wrong.
There is partial regulation.In a truly unregulated market the vessels losing millions of dollars would instead pay millions of dollars to have all of the pirates killed.But they cannot do that because they are regulated.This is nothing more than an example of uneven regulation (which is usually a sign of corruption, I'm looking at you united nations).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297296</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>hey</author>
	<datestamp>1259596680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It could actually evolve into a legit market.  Instead of raising money for hijackings then gather money of other ventures.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It could actually evolve into a legit market .
Instead of raising money for hijackings then gather money of other ventures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It could actually evolve into a legit market.
Instead of raising money for hijackings then gather money of other ventures.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293528</id>
	<title>just bomb them</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259689260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't understand why people negotiate with these pirates. It only encourages them. I know I will appear hearthless but the best way to minimise harm would be to send a warplane and sink any vessel a pirate group get control off. It would kill a few innocent people but it would save many more lifes at the end.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand why people negotiate with these pirates .
It only encourages them .
I know I will appear hearthless but the best way to minimise harm would be to send a warplane and sink any vessel a pirate group get control off .
It would kill a few innocent people but it would save many more lifes at the end .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand why people negotiate with these pirates.
It only encourages them.
I know I will appear hearthless but the best way to minimise harm would be to send a warplane and sink any vessel a pirate group get control off.
It would kill a few innocent people but it would save many more lifes at the end.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294474</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1259611620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just drop them out of a Hercules with a huge bag. They'll talk up enough hot air to fill that bag and float safely to the ground.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just drop them out of a Hercules with a huge bag .
They 'll talk up enough hot air to fill that bag and float safely to the ground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just drop them out of a Hercules with a huge bag.
They'll talk up enough hot air to fill that bag and float safely to the ground.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30298186</id>
	<title>Pirate Corporations</title>
	<author>grep\_rocks</author>
	<datestamp>1259600940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well it is nice to see that there is a company that is openly a pirate corporation - this might be a new trend, windows could change its icon to the jolly roger</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well it is nice to see that there is a company that is openly a pirate corporation - this might be a new trend , windows could change its icon to the jolly roger</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well it is nice to see that there is a company that is openly a pirate corporation - this might be a new trend, windows could change its icon to the jolly roger</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294212</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>Jazz-Masta</author>
	<datestamp>1259695440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>which makes for some interesting cognitive dissonance in those<br>who romanticize the old-school version but demonize the Somali version.</p></div><p>I'm guessing the reason why is that the Somali pirates don't look like Johnny Depp or Orlando Bloom...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>which makes for some interesting cognitive dissonance in thosewho romanticize the old-school version but demonize the Somali version.I 'm guessing the reason why is that the Somali pirates do n't look like Johnny Depp or Orlando Bloom.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>which makes for some interesting cognitive dissonance in thosewho romanticize the old-school version but demonize the Somali version.I'm guessing the reason why is that the Somali pirates don't look like Johnny Depp or Orlando Bloom...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296600</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>Asic Eng</author>
	<datestamp>1259592660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They won't do it because of regulation, but because of the prisoner's dilemma.
<p>
It doesn't make sense for a single shipping company to raise an army and pay for the pirates to be killed. Their own costs would go up, while competing companies would get the same benefit and not share the cost. So as a result none of the companies will do anything to improve the overall situation.
</p><p>
They can overcome this problem by cooperating - creating a common organization which organizes the army and having each company pay part of the cost - e.g. by charging a fee for the passage through Somali waters, depending on the amount of goods you are transporting. Of course you could then call the fee "tax" and the "common organization which organizes the army and collects the tax" could be named "state" in short.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They wo n't do it because of regulation , but because of the prisoner 's dilemma .
It does n't make sense for a single shipping company to raise an army and pay for the pirates to be killed .
Their own costs would go up , while competing companies would get the same benefit and not share the cost .
So as a result none of the companies will do anything to improve the overall situation .
They can overcome this problem by cooperating - creating a common organization which organizes the army and having each company pay part of the cost - e.g .
by charging a fee for the passage through Somali waters , depending on the amount of goods you are transporting .
Of course you could then call the fee " tax " and the " common organization which organizes the army and collects the tax " could be named " state " in short .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They won't do it because of regulation, but because of the prisoner's dilemma.
It doesn't make sense for a single shipping company to raise an army and pay for the pirates to be killed.
Their own costs would go up, while competing companies would get the same benefit and not share the cost.
So as a result none of the companies will do anything to improve the overall situation.
They can overcome this problem by cooperating - creating a common organization which organizes the army and having each company pay part of the cost - e.g.
by charging a fee for the passage through Somali waters, depending on the amount of goods you are transporting.
Of course you could then call the fee "tax" and the "common organization which organizes the army and collects the tax" could be named "state" in short.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294402</id>
	<title>Re:Why not?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259697360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the 17th century most privateers were owned by joint stock companies.  Their business assets were usually a warship, contract with a captain, and a letter of marque.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the 17th century most privateers were owned by joint stock companies .
Their business assets were usually a warship , contract with a captain , and a letter of marque .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the 17th century most privateers were owned by joint stock companies.
Their business assets were usually a warship, contract with a captain, and a letter of marque.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293492</id>
	<title>there's one born every minute</title>
	<author>timmarhy</author>
	<datestamp>1259689080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There will be moron's who invest in this. my guess is they won't see a cent, and the extra money will ramp up piracy to the point ships stop using that route or they have armed escorts which blow somali's out of the water.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There will be moron 's who invest in this .
my guess is they wo n't see a cent , and the extra money will ramp up piracy to the point ships stop using that route or they have armed escorts which blow somali 's out of the water .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There will be moron's who invest in this.
my guess is they won't see a cent, and the extra money will ramp up piracy to the point ships stop using that route or they have armed escorts which blow somali's out of the water.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295376</id>
	<title>wait a minute...</title>
	<author>AlgorithMan</author>
	<datestamp>1259580360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>it's not april 1...</htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's not april 1.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's not april 1...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293762</id>
	<title>Wrong.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259691120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Piracy is not illegal in Somalia. Once again like a typical ignorant American, you make the mistake of arrogantly thinking U.S. law applies everywhere outside your declining nation. Stick to playing your video games and stuffing your obese body with junk food. I myself am going to invest $100.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Piracy is not illegal in Somalia .
Once again like a typical ignorant American , you make the mistake of arrogantly thinking U.S. law applies everywhere outside your declining nation .
Stick to playing your video games and stuffing your obese body with junk food .
I myself am going to invest $ 100 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Piracy is not illegal in Somalia.
Once again like a typical ignorant American, you make the mistake of arrogantly thinking U.S. law applies everywhere outside your declining nation.
Stick to playing your video games and stuffing your obese body with junk food.
I myself am going to invest $100.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295238</id>
	<title>Re:Why not?</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1259578800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly. Let me piratly hijack this +5 post (Yarrrr!) to add a point.<br>
Somalia has no official government, therefore no police, no coast guards, no naval force. What exactly is a "Spanish tuna fishing vessel" doing off Somalian coast ? I'll tell you : it is fishing illegally there. Well, illegally is a theoretic term because there are no functioning law system to prevent them doing so. So what happens ? Some Somalian fishermen gather, put money in common, arm a vessel and try to bring some order.<br> <br>
Illegal fishing is a minor offense. But you have to know that illegal dumping of nuclear waste also occurred in Somalia waters. I must say that I consider it a good news that they form cooperatives instead of lord-vassal structure.<br> <br>There is also a basic fact I like to remind concerning these "pirates" : they have not killed any hostage yet. The only hostage to die was killed by a (French) military in a recovery mission.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
Let me piratly hijack this + 5 post ( Yarrrr !
) to add a point .
Somalia has no official government , therefore no police , no coast guards , no naval force .
What exactly is a " Spanish tuna fishing vessel " doing off Somalian coast ?
I 'll tell you : it is fishing illegally there .
Well , illegally is a theoretic term because there are no functioning law system to prevent them doing so .
So what happens ?
Some Somalian fishermen gather , put money in common , arm a vessel and try to bring some order .
Illegal fishing is a minor offense .
But you have to know that illegal dumping of nuclear waste also occurred in Somalia waters .
I must say that I consider it a good news that they form cooperatives instead of lord-vassal structure .
There is also a basic fact I like to remind concerning these " pirates " : they have not killed any hostage yet .
The only hostage to die was killed by a ( French ) military in a recovery mission .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
Let me piratly hijack this +5 post (Yarrrr!
) to add a point.
Somalia has no official government, therefore no police, no coast guards, no naval force.
What exactly is a "Spanish tuna fishing vessel" doing off Somalian coast ?
I'll tell you : it is fishing illegally there.
Well, illegally is a theoretic term because there are no functioning law system to prevent them doing so.
So what happens ?
Some Somalian fishermen gather, put money in common, arm a vessel and try to bring some order.
Illegal fishing is a minor offense.
But you have to know that illegal dumping of nuclear waste also occurred in Somalia waters.
I must say that I consider it a good news that they form cooperatives instead of lord-vassal structure.
There is also a basic fact I like to remind concerning these "pirates" : they have not killed any hostage yet.
The only hostage to die was killed by a (French) military in a recovery mission.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295904</id>
	<title>Re:Why not?</title>
	<author>Walterk</author>
	<datestamp>1259586720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Disclaimer, I'm Dutch.</p><p>Back when the VOC (what you would call the DEIC) was operating, the world was generally at war with everybody, competing for many resources. They had to arm themselves to get a slice of the pie, otherwise other countries would take it instead. I guess what's really different between to two is that when the VOC was around, everybody was competing with guns, but these days it's just the Somalians.</p><p>*shrug*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Disclaimer , I 'm Dutch.Back when the VOC ( what you would call the DEIC ) was operating , the world was generally at war with everybody , competing for many resources .
They had to arm themselves to get a slice of the pie , otherwise other countries would take it instead .
I guess what 's really different between to two is that when the VOC was around , everybody was competing with guns , but these days it 's just the Somalians .
* shrug *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disclaimer, I'm Dutch.Back when the VOC (what you would call the DEIC) was operating, the world was generally at war with everybody, competing for many resources.
They had to arm themselves to get a slice of the pie, otherwise other countries would take it instead.
I guess what's really different between to two is that when the VOC was around, everybody was competing with guns, but these days it's just the Somalians.
*shrug*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293718</id>
	<title>Re:That's funny, expecting her share?</title>
	<author>pla</author>
	<datestamp>1259690820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>They're freaking pirates! This woman is an idiot if she expects any money from this. It's not like she's seeding a movie!</i> <br>
<br>
Historically, pirates (in the 1600s US/Caribbean/Europe trade route sense) observed a fairly strict code of conduct which included
reimbursing investors their fair share; widows/orphans got their ex-father's share, and generally they did a lot less killing than
their reputation suggested.<br>
<br>
It sounds like modern pirates appear to follow fairly similar rules, which makes for some interesting cognitive dissonance in those
who romanticize the old-school version but demonize the Somali version.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're freaking pirates !
This woman is an idiot if she expects any money from this .
It 's not like she 's seeding a movie !
Historically , pirates ( in the 1600s US/Caribbean/Europe trade route sense ) observed a fairly strict code of conduct which included reimbursing investors their fair share ; widows/orphans got their ex-father 's share , and generally they did a lot less killing than their reputation suggested .
It sounds like modern pirates appear to follow fairly similar rules , which makes for some interesting cognitive dissonance in those who romanticize the old-school version but demonize the Somali version .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're freaking pirates!
This woman is an idiot if she expects any money from this.
It's not like she's seeding a movie!
Historically, pirates (in the 1600s US/Caribbean/Europe trade route sense) observed a fairly strict code of conduct which included
reimbursing investors their fair share; widows/orphans got their ex-father's share, and generally they did a lot less killing than
their reputation suggested.
It sounds like modern pirates appear to follow fairly similar rules, which makes for some interesting cognitive dissonance in those
who romanticize the old-school version but demonize the Somali version.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293704</id>
	<title>Re:there's one born every minute</title>
	<author>AdmiralXyz</author>
	<datestamp>1259690700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think you're missing the point. This is not something Wall Street bankers are going to be investing in. The kind of people chipping in to this operation are probably the sort of people who are just as likely as the pirates themselves to not take being cheated so well, and express that dissatisfaction with automatic weapons.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you 're missing the point .
This is not something Wall Street bankers are going to be investing in .
The kind of people chipping in to this operation are probably the sort of people who are just as likely as the pirates themselves to not take being cheated so well , and express that dissatisfaction with automatic weapons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you're missing the point.
This is not something Wall Street bankers are going to be investing in.
The kind of people chipping in to this operation are probably the sort of people who are just as likely as the pirates themselves to not take being cheated so well, and express that dissatisfaction with automatic weapons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297866</id>
	<title>If you were a sea captain in these waters...</title>
	<author>thelonious</author>
	<datestamp>1259599560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't you want to arm yourself? Maybe even hire a few guns for the ride? Maybe even get the crew some target practice? Don't captains have some say in protecting their crew/cargo?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't you want to arm yourself ?
Maybe even hire a few guns for the ride ?
Maybe even get the crew some target practice ?
Do n't captains have some say in protecting their crew/cargo ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't you want to arm yourself?
Maybe even hire a few guns for the ride?
Maybe even get the crew some target practice?
Don't captains have some say in protecting their crew/cargo?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293532</id>
	<title>This is a really bad idea</title>
	<author>slashqwerty</author>
	<datestamp>1259689320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>for everyone but the pirates.  Participation in this scheme would be a criminal conspiracy to commit piracy, kidnapping, theft, and hostage-taking.  Even if the pirates' plan is to swindle money from the investors and not pay out anything it is still a crime to participate in a scheme where the intent is to commit a crime.

<br> <br>The only reason the pirates have gotten away with their actions so far is because they are outside the jurisdiction of any interested government.  People who participate in this scheme from pretty much anywhere but Somalia are likely to find themselves in quite a lot of legal trouble.</htmltext>
<tokenext>for everyone but the pirates .
Participation in this scheme would be a criminal conspiracy to commit piracy , kidnapping , theft , and hostage-taking .
Even if the pirates ' plan is to swindle money from the investors and not pay out anything it is still a crime to participate in a scheme where the intent is to commit a crime .
The only reason the pirates have gotten away with their actions so far is because they are outside the jurisdiction of any interested government .
People who participate in this scheme from pretty much anywhere but Somalia are likely to find themselves in quite a lot of legal trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for everyone but the pirates.
Participation in this scheme would be a criminal conspiracy to commit piracy, kidnapping, theft, and hostage-taking.
Even if the pirates' plan is to swindle money from the investors and not pay out anything it is still a crime to participate in a scheme where the intent is to commit a crime.
The only reason the pirates have gotten away with their actions so far is because they are outside the jurisdiction of any interested government.
People who participate in this scheme from pretty much anywhere but Somalia are likely to find themselves in quite a lot of legal trouble.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296962</id>
	<title>Way to end the piracy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259595000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An easy way to end the piracy is for every ship that the Somali pirates capture a Somali port should be bombed to oblivion. Either the pirates will get the message and stop engaging in piracy, or every port will eventually be destroyed. With all the port destroyed there will be no place for the Somali pirates to bring captured ships. No place for the Somali pirates to go home to. The ones at sea will starve to death.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An easy way to end the piracy is for every ship that the Somali pirates capture a Somali port should be bombed to oblivion .
Either the pirates will get the message and stop engaging in piracy , or every port will eventually be destroyed .
With all the port destroyed there will be no place for the Somali pirates to bring captured ships .
No place for the Somali pirates to go home to .
The ones at sea will starve to death .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An easy way to end the piracy is for every ship that the Somali pirates capture a Somali port should be bombed to oblivion.
Either the pirates will get the message and stop engaging in piracy, or every port will eventually be destroyed.
With all the port destroyed there will be no place for the Somali pirates to bring captured ships.
No place for the Somali pirates to go home to.
The ones at sea will starve to death.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293936</id>
	<title>Re:Gunboat diplomacy</title>
	<author>Barny</author>
	<datestamp>1259692440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ahh, but you see they are not terrorists (yet), so they are off the radar of the general public.</p><p>Give your government some credit though, Somalia will be invaded to preserve freedom soon enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahh , but you see they are not terrorists ( yet ) , so they are off the radar of the general public.Give your government some credit though , Somalia will be invaded to preserve freedom soon enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahh, but you see they are not terrorists (yet), so they are off the radar of the general public.Give your government some credit though, Somalia will be invaded to preserve freedom soon enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297250</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>amplt1337</author>
	<datestamp>1259596560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which regulation is it, exactly, that prevents shipping companies from paying to have pirates killed?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which regulation is it , exactly , that prevents shipping companies from paying to have pirates killed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which regulation is it, exactly, that prevents shipping companies from paying to have pirates killed?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30299694</id>
	<title>Coming soon to Facebook</title>
	<author>Stavr0</author>
	<datestamp>1259607480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So basically, they've implemented a real life version of Zynga's Mob Wars / Gang Wars / Pirates game.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So basically , they 've implemented a real life version of Zynga 's Mob Wars / Gang Wars / Pirates game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So basically, they've implemented a real life version of Zynga's Mob Wars / Gang Wars / Pirates game.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295856</id>
	<title>So is this the...</title>
	<author>6Yankee</author>
	<datestamp>1259586120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...Dhow Jones?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Dhow Jones ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Dhow Jones?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293946</id>
	<title>Re:Behold, a free market evangelists dream takes f</title>
	<author>MindlessAutomata</author>
	<datestamp>1259692560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's laissez-faire capitalism on the government level, too, I guess, as nobody stands above governments to regulate them.  And since there exists bad governments, and since every government oppresses its citizenry on some level, clearly the entire endeavor is a failure and we need god to regulate government, and then something to regulate god.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's laissez-faire capitalism on the government level , too , I guess , as nobody stands above governments to regulate them .
And since there exists bad governments , and since every government oppresses its citizenry on some level , clearly the entire endeavor is a failure and we need god to regulate government , and then something to regulate god .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's laissez-faire capitalism on the government level, too, I guess, as nobody stands above governments to regulate them.
And since there exists bad governments, and since every government oppresses its citizenry on some level, clearly the entire endeavor is a failure and we need god to regulate government, and then something to regulate god.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294288</id>
	<title>i'm ok with it....</title>
	<author>underqualified</author>
	<datestamp>1259696160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>as long as they pay taxes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>as long as they pay taxes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as long as they pay taxes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30300446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30303320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30299472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30311506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294534
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296600
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293898
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30300072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30298356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30299188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30305086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30308790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293644
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30299014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30299600
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294902
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30299716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30301096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30321940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293586
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_02_0130216_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30298680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293704
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293882
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293514
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30299716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294538
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295674
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296032
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30300072
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30298680
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30321940
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297212
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295344
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294748
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30298356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294902
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295262
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294264
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295460
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293532
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293762
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294432
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294084
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294990
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294232
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30303320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294020
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293456
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294932
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293672
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293720
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293844
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293742
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294122
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295908
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30311506
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30299188
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296600
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297250
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296750
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294960
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295144
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30301096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30296558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293548
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30300446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30299472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293992
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294442
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30299600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293796
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297210
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294722
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30308790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293718
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294654
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30299014
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294212
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294086
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295706
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295286
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30305086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293586
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293872
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30297656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295094
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294780
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30294792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30295432
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_02_0130216.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_02_0130216.30293500
</commentlist>
</conversation>
