<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_01_2045227</id>
	<title>Scientology Charged With Slavery, Human Trafficking</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1259659740000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>eldavojohn writes <i>"A <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/23175190/Complaint-filed112509">formal complaint was filed in California</a> (caged PDF) last week by John Lindstein naming <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David\_Miscavige">David Miscavige</a> and the Church of Scientology International as defendants. Lindstein claims that for sixteen years (from age 8) he was <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2009/12/01/Man\_Says\_Scientologists\_Enslaved\_Him\_as\_Boy.htm">forced to work as a slave</a> at Gold Base, a secret CoS site run by Golden Era Productions with 'razor wire, security guard patrols, surveillance posts, and three roll calls each day.' The pay was $50 a week. <a href="http://infinitecomplacency.blogspot.com/2009/11/16-john-lindsteins-lawsuit.html">The allegations</a> include 'Violations of wage and hour laws as well as unfair/illegal business practices actionable under California B&amp;P 17200 Et. Seq.' and a complaint under the 13th Amendment of the US Constitution, which abolished slavery. Members of the group Anonymous <a href="http://forums.whyweprotest.net/123-leaks-legal/david-miscavige-sued-summons-issued-11-25-09-a-57318/">praised the summons</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>eldavojohn writes " A formal complaint was filed in California ( caged PDF ) last week by John Lindstein naming David Miscavige and the Church of Scientology International as defendants .
Lindstein claims that for sixteen years ( from age 8 ) he was forced to work as a slave at Gold Base , a secret CoS site run by Golden Era Productions with 'razor wire , security guard patrols , surveillance posts , and three roll calls each day .
' The pay was $ 50 a week .
The allegations include 'Violations of wage and hour laws as well as unfair/illegal business practices actionable under California B&amp;P 17200 Et .
Seq. ' and a complaint under the 13th Amendment of the US Constitution , which abolished slavery .
Members of the group Anonymous praised the summons .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>eldavojohn writes "A formal complaint was filed in California (caged PDF) last week by John Lindstein naming David Miscavige and the Church of Scientology International as defendants.
Lindstein claims that for sixteen years (from age 8) he was forced to work as a slave at Gold Base, a secret CoS site run by Golden Era Productions with 'razor wire, security guard patrols, surveillance posts, and three roll calls each day.
' The pay was $50 a week.
The allegations include 'Violations of wage and hour laws as well as unfair/illegal business practices actionable under California B&amp;P 17200 Et.
Seq.' and a complaint under the 13th Amendment of the US Constitution, which abolished slavery.
Members of the group Anonymous praised the summons.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30302198</id>
	<title>Re:Gold Base (Gilman Springs, CA)</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1259574720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I clicked, looking for a smoking gun, but I don't think this is it:</p><p>1)  I can't tell that it is facing inward.  How can you tell?</p><p>2)  It is clearly meant for storage, with little room for forced labor around it.  Unless it is perhaps covering an entrance to something underground.  Otherwise, the fence is likely to prevent theft.</p><p>3)  It reminds me a lot of a communications building such as might house a telephone switch.</p><p>What are you seeing that I'm not?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I clicked , looking for a smoking gun , but I do n't think this is it : 1 ) I ca n't tell that it is facing inward .
How can you tell ? 2 ) It is clearly meant for storage , with little room for forced labor around it .
Unless it is perhaps covering an entrance to something underground .
Otherwise , the fence is likely to prevent theft.3 ) It reminds me a lot of a communications building such as might house a telephone switch.What are you seeing that I 'm not ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I clicked, looking for a smoking gun, but I don't think this is it:1)  I can't tell that it is facing inward.
How can you tell?2)  It is clearly meant for storage, with little room for forced labor around it.
Unless it is perhaps covering an entrance to something underground.
Otherwise, the fence is likely to prevent theft.3)  It reminds me a lot of a communications building such as might house a telephone switch.What are you seeing that I'm not?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298364</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>Makido</author>
	<datestamp>1259601720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I waffled on whether or not to respond to this post, beings as what I wanted to say about it has already been said and modded out of veiw, but here it goes anyway:</p><p>Your comment achieves nothing more than offending both camps of which you speak.  You offend the religious and those willing to believe in inexplicable miracles by discounting the value and power of their faith in the otherwise unbelievable.  The point of their beliefs (in many cases) is that they ARE ridiculous, in the common sense.  They don't require proof and will frequently reject it so that their faith stands on only their own power of will -- a character trait that they and many others value.</p><p>You offend those of a more scientific persuasion by asserting that the individuals who have actually done the first-hand work of technical and observational science (and those who trust in their consensus) are either liars or are participating some kind of mass halucination.</p><p>Your judgment on the sincerity of 'religions' is nearly as misguided.  Organized religion is used by its leaders almost as often for personal gain as it for personal enlightenment.  If you'd like to contest that, I suggest you do some research into ownership of most of the private land of the Rocky Mountains and many important corporations of America.  In the case of those that follow the New Testament, such lavish positions of power and money is unwise if not directly hypocritical for as Jesus is reported as saying to Lazarus, "It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of needle than it is for a rich man to pass through the gates of Heaven."</p><p>In addition, so many of these churches in the past, particularly the Anglican and Catholic, have only proven Mao Zedong's famous quote that religion is the opiate of the masses by mixing church and state to the point of justifying great political atrocities.  All those leader's had to do assuage the concerns of the ruled populace is claim that God told them to do it.  Doesn't sound very sincere to me; and if it isn't, does that make all these listed mainstream religions into cults, is that all it takes?</p><p>My real point of contention is that your post was modded as Insightful, when all it really amounts to is uninformed, egocentric assertions deserving little more than a Flamebait tag.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I waffled on whether or not to respond to this post , beings as what I wanted to say about it has already been said and modded out of veiw , but here it goes anyway : Your comment achieves nothing more than offending both camps of which you speak .
You offend the religious and those willing to believe in inexplicable miracles by discounting the value and power of their faith in the otherwise unbelievable .
The point of their beliefs ( in many cases ) is that they ARE ridiculous , in the common sense .
They do n't require proof and will frequently reject it so that their faith stands on only their own power of will -- a character trait that they and many others value.You offend those of a more scientific persuasion by asserting that the individuals who have actually done the first-hand work of technical and observational science ( and those who trust in their consensus ) are either liars or are participating some kind of mass halucination.Your judgment on the sincerity of 'religions ' is nearly as misguided .
Organized religion is used by its leaders almost as often for personal gain as it for personal enlightenment .
If you 'd like to contest that , I suggest you do some research into ownership of most of the private land of the Rocky Mountains and many important corporations of America .
In the case of those that follow the New Testament , such lavish positions of power and money is unwise if not directly hypocritical for as Jesus is reported as saying to Lazarus , " It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of needle than it is for a rich man to pass through the gates of Heaven .
" In addition , so many of these churches in the past , particularly the Anglican and Catholic , have only proven Mao Zedong 's famous quote that religion is the opiate of the masses by mixing church and state to the point of justifying great political atrocities .
All those leader 's had to do assuage the concerns of the ruled populace is claim that God told them to do it .
Does n't sound very sincere to me ; and if it is n't , does that make all these listed mainstream religions into cults , is that all it takes ? My real point of contention is that your post was modded as Insightful , when all it really amounts to is uninformed , egocentric assertions deserving little more than a Flamebait tag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I waffled on whether or not to respond to this post, beings as what I wanted to say about it has already been said and modded out of veiw, but here it goes anyway:Your comment achieves nothing more than offending both camps of which you speak.
You offend the religious and those willing to believe in inexplicable miracles by discounting the value and power of their faith in the otherwise unbelievable.
The point of their beliefs (in many cases) is that they ARE ridiculous, in the common sense.
They don't require proof and will frequently reject it so that their faith stands on only their own power of will -- a character trait that they and many others value.You offend those of a more scientific persuasion by asserting that the individuals who have actually done the first-hand work of technical and observational science (and those who trust in their consensus) are either liars or are participating some kind of mass halucination.Your judgment on the sincerity of 'religions' is nearly as misguided.
Organized religion is used by its leaders almost as often for personal gain as it for personal enlightenment.
If you'd like to contest that, I suggest you do some research into ownership of most of the private land of the Rocky Mountains and many important corporations of America.
In the case of those that follow the New Testament, such lavish positions of power and money is unwise if not directly hypocritical for as Jesus is reported as saying to Lazarus, "It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of needle than it is for a rich man to pass through the gates of Heaven.
"In addition, so many of these churches in the past, particularly the Anglican and Catholic, have only proven Mao Zedong's famous quote that religion is the opiate of the masses by mixing church and state to the point of justifying great political atrocities.
All those leader's had to do assuage the concerns of the ruled populace is claim that God told them to do it.
Doesn't sound very sincere to me; and if it isn't, does that make all these listed mainstream religions into cults, is that all it takes?My real point of contention is that your post was modded as Insightful, when all it really amounts to is uninformed, egocentric assertions deserving little more than a Flamebait tag.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291770</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>Noren</author>
	<datestamp>1259675520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Considering that the FBI pumped <a href="http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid\%3A77866" title="austinchronicle.com">77 pounds</a> [austinchronicle.com] of a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CS\_gas" title="wikipedia.org">flammable aerosol</a> [wikipedia.org] into the compound, you might want to rethink who was to blame for the fire.  But I do agree, it was "pretty harsh".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering that the FBI pumped 77 pounds [ austinchronicle.com ] of a flammable aerosol [ wikipedia.org ] into the compound , you might want to rethink who was to blame for the fire .
But I do agree , it was " pretty harsh " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering that the FBI pumped 77 pounds [austinchronicle.com] of a flammable aerosol [wikipedia.org] into the compound, you might want to rethink who was to blame for the fire.
But I do agree, it was "pretty harsh".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292462</id>
	<title>Re:I love it!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259679840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can if you want.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can if you want .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can if you want.
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293954</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>mahadiga</author>
	<datestamp>1259692620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>"Religion was born when the first con man met the first fool." -- Mark Twain</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Religion was born when the first con man met the first fool .
" -- Mark Twain</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Religion was born when the first con man met the first fool.
" -- Mark Twain</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292552</id>
	<title>Re:Scientology as a force for good?</title>
	<author>Buelldozer</author>
	<datestamp>1259680440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hold on, you think that Televangelists shilling for dollars on your TV are in the same league as a "Religion" that allegedly deals in human slaves, has infiltrated governments and influenced their decisions, and threatens the free flow of information on the Internet?</p><p>Wow! I'm curious, where exactly would I find you on Sunday morning Mr. Martian? Do you attend the "Gold Bunker" or do you call another facility home?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hold on , you think that Televangelists shilling for dollars on your TV are in the same league as a " Religion " that allegedly deals in human slaves , has infiltrated governments and influenced their decisions , and threatens the free flow of information on the Internet ? Wow !
I 'm curious , where exactly would I find you on Sunday morning Mr. Martian ? Do you attend the " Gold Bunker " or do you call another facility home ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hold on, you think that Televangelists shilling for dollars on your TV are in the same league as a "Religion" that allegedly deals in human slaves, has infiltrated governments and influenced their decisions, and threatens the free flow of information on the Internet?Wow!
I'm curious, where exactly would I find you on Sunday morning Mr. Martian? Do you attend the "Gold Bunker" or do you call another facility home?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291656</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>wisnoskij</author>
	<datestamp>1259674980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As long as they have big celebrities that are scientologists and publicly endorse the cult they are mainstream, in my opinion.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as they have big celebrities that are scientologists and publicly endorse the cult they are mainstream , in my opinion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as they have big celebrities that are scientologists and publicly endorse the cult they are mainstream, in my opinion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290844</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1259670720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I personally think it should be taken one step further than that. All organized religion should be treated with utter contempt.</p></div><p>That's an interesting thought, I'd like to hear more.  Actually, no, I'll just blindly follow your authority.  Could I give you money?  If I treat all other organized religions with utter contempt, maybe declaring a holy war against them, will I go to some type of pleasurable afterlife?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I personally think it should be taken one step further than that .
All organized religion should be treated with utter contempt.That 's an interesting thought , I 'd like to hear more .
Actually , no , I 'll just blindly follow your authority .
Could I give you money ?
If I treat all other organized religions with utter contempt , maybe declaring a holy war against them , will I go to some type of pleasurable afterlife ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I personally think it should be taken one step further than that.
All organized religion should be treated with utter contempt.That's an interesting thought, I'd like to hear more.
Actually, no, I'll just blindly follow your authority.
Could I give you money?
If I treat all other organized religions with utter contempt, maybe declaring a holy war against them, will I go to some type of pleasurable afterlife?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291486</id>
	<title>Re:No difference than the Christian cult</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259673840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like you were a slave to your parents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like you were a slave to your parents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like you were a slave to your parents.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174</id>
	<title>really?</title>
	<author>sopssa</author>
	<datestamp>1259663460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Was this a surprise to anyone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was this a surprise to anyone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was this a surprise to anyone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290208</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259667780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hmm, how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism, trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?</p></div><p>perhaps the point is not to lend legitimacy to the upstart wacko religion but to show the illegitimacy of both the old and new wacko religions.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism , trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion ? perhaps the point is not to lend legitimacy to the upstart wacko religion but to show the illegitimacy of both the old and new wacko religions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism, trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?perhaps the point is not to lend legitimacy to the upstart wacko religion but to show the illegitimacy of both the old and new wacko religions.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289856</id>
	<title>Re:Scientology as a force for good?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259666280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's the South Park episode.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's the South Park episode .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's the South Park episode.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290082</id>
	<title>Re:How Is This Nerd News??!!</title>
	<author>greywire</author>
	<datestamp>1259667120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think most nerds are interested in a lot of topics beyond computers, sci-fi and anime.  Thats the only reason needed.  News for Nerds, stuff that matters... thats potentially everything, but with a nerd bias.</p><p>In other words, intelligent news.</p><p>If you want news about a cute doggy that's adopted a litter of kitty cats, then watch TV.  If you want news about a study of inter-species social interactions, read slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think most nerds are interested in a lot of topics beyond computers , sci-fi and anime .
Thats the only reason needed .
News for Nerds , stuff that matters... thats potentially everything , but with a nerd bias.In other words , intelligent news.If you want news about a cute doggy that 's adopted a litter of kitty cats , then watch TV .
If you want news about a study of inter-species social interactions , read slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think most nerds are interested in a lot of topics beyond computers, sci-fi and anime.
Thats the only reason needed.
News for Nerds, stuff that matters... thats potentially everything, but with a nerd bias.In other words, intelligent news.If you want news about a cute doggy that's adopted a litter of kitty cats, then watch TV.
If you want news about a study of inter-species social interactions, read slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291180</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>bledri</author>
	<datestamp>1259672340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?</p></div><p> <tt>
if statement.contains("religion") and statement.contains("legit*"):
    head.explode()
</tt></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion ?
if statement.contains ( " religion " ) and statement.contains ( " legit * " ) : head.explode ( )</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?
if statement.contains("religion") and statement.contains("legit*"):
    head.explode()

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293120</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>plover</author>
	<datestamp>1259685360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Quite right.  GP also referred to the CoS as 'mainstream'.  There is nothing mainstream about them.  Most other countries don't even recognize them as a religion.  They are a money making / power grabbing scheme dreamed up by a <strong>third</strong> rate megalomaniac science fiction author that has now taken on a life of its own.</p></div><p>Apparently you have never read any of his books, so I fixed that for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Quite right .
GP also referred to the CoS as 'mainstream' .
There is nothing mainstream about them .
Most other countries do n't even recognize them as a religion .
They are a money making / power grabbing scheme dreamed up by a third rate megalomaniac science fiction author that has now taken on a life of its own.Apparently you have never read any of his books , so I fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quite right.
GP also referred to the CoS as 'mainstream'.
There is nothing mainstream about them.
Most other countries don't even recognize them as a religion.
They are a money making / power grabbing scheme dreamed up by a third rate megalomaniac science fiction author that has now taken on a life of its own.Apparently you have never read any of his books, so I fixed that for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30309942</id>
	<title>Xenu</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259854620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once upon a time (75 million years ago to be more precise) there was an alien galactic ruler named Xenu. Xenu was in charge of all the planets in this part of the galaxy including our own planet Earth, except in those days it was called Teegeeack.</p><p>Xenu the alien ruler Now Xenu had a problem. All of the 76 planets he controlled were overpopulated. Each planet had on average 178 billion people. He wanted to get rid of all the overpopulation so he had a plan.</p><p>Xenu took over complete control with the help of renegades to defeat the good people and the Loyal Officers. Then with the help of psychiatrists he called in billions of people for income tax inspections where they were instead given injections of alcohol and glycol mixed to paralyse them. Then they were put into space planes that looked exactly like DC8s (except they had rocket motors instead of propellers).</p><p>These DC8 space planes then flew to planet Earth where the paralysed people were stacked around the bases of volcanoes in their hundreds of billions. When they had finished stacking them around then H-bombs were lowered into the volcanoes. Xenu then detonated all the H-bombs at the same time and everyone was killed.</p><p>The story doesn't end there though. Since everyone has a soul (called a "thetan" in this story) then you have to trick souls into not coming back again. So while the hundreds of billions of souls were being blown around by the nuclear winds he had special electronic traps that caught all the souls in electronic beams (the electronic beams were sticky like fly-paper).</p><p>After he had captured all these souls he had them packed into boxes and taken to a few huge cinemas. There all the souls had to spend days watching special 3D motion pictures that told them what life should be like and many confusing things. In this film they were shown false pictures and told they were God, The Devil and Christ. In the story this process is called "implanting".</p><p>When the films ended and the souls left the cinema these souls started to stick together because since they had all seen the same film they thought they were the same people. They clustered in groups of a few thousand. Now because there were only a few living bodies left they stayed as clusters and inhabited these bodies.</p><p>As for Xenu, the Loyal Officers finally overthrew him and they locked him away in a mountain on one of the planets. He is kept in by a force-field powered by an eternal battery and Xenu is still alive today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once upon a time ( 75 million years ago to be more precise ) there was an alien galactic ruler named Xenu .
Xenu was in charge of all the planets in this part of the galaxy including our own planet Earth , except in those days it was called Teegeeack.Xenu the alien ruler Now Xenu had a problem .
All of the 76 planets he controlled were overpopulated .
Each planet had on average 178 billion people .
He wanted to get rid of all the overpopulation so he had a plan.Xenu took over complete control with the help of renegades to defeat the good people and the Loyal Officers .
Then with the help of psychiatrists he called in billions of people for income tax inspections where they were instead given injections of alcohol and glycol mixed to paralyse them .
Then they were put into space planes that looked exactly like DC8s ( except they had rocket motors instead of propellers ) .These DC8 space planes then flew to planet Earth where the paralysed people were stacked around the bases of volcanoes in their hundreds of billions .
When they had finished stacking them around then H-bombs were lowered into the volcanoes .
Xenu then detonated all the H-bombs at the same time and everyone was killed.The story does n't end there though .
Since everyone has a soul ( called a " thetan " in this story ) then you have to trick souls into not coming back again .
So while the hundreds of billions of souls were being blown around by the nuclear winds he had special electronic traps that caught all the souls in electronic beams ( the electronic beams were sticky like fly-paper ) .After he had captured all these souls he had them packed into boxes and taken to a few huge cinemas .
There all the souls had to spend days watching special 3D motion pictures that told them what life should be like and many confusing things .
In this film they were shown false pictures and told they were God , The Devil and Christ .
In the story this process is called " implanting " .When the films ended and the souls left the cinema these souls started to stick together because since they had all seen the same film they thought they were the same people .
They clustered in groups of a few thousand .
Now because there were only a few living bodies left they stayed as clusters and inhabited these bodies.As for Xenu , the Loyal Officers finally overthrew him and they locked him away in a mountain on one of the planets .
He is kept in by a force-field powered by an eternal battery and Xenu is still alive today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once upon a time (75 million years ago to be more precise) there was an alien galactic ruler named Xenu.
Xenu was in charge of all the planets in this part of the galaxy including our own planet Earth, except in those days it was called Teegeeack.Xenu the alien ruler Now Xenu had a problem.
All of the 76 planets he controlled were overpopulated.
Each planet had on average 178 billion people.
He wanted to get rid of all the overpopulation so he had a plan.Xenu took over complete control with the help of renegades to defeat the good people and the Loyal Officers.
Then with the help of psychiatrists he called in billions of people for income tax inspections where they were instead given injections of alcohol and glycol mixed to paralyse them.
Then they were put into space planes that looked exactly like DC8s (except they had rocket motors instead of propellers).These DC8 space planes then flew to planet Earth where the paralysed people were stacked around the bases of volcanoes in their hundreds of billions.
When they had finished stacking them around then H-bombs were lowered into the volcanoes.
Xenu then detonated all the H-bombs at the same time and everyone was killed.The story doesn't end there though.
Since everyone has a soul (called a "thetan" in this story) then you have to trick souls into not coming back again.
So while the hundreds of billions of souls were being blown around by the nuclear winds he had special electronic traps that caught all the souls in electronic beams (the electronic beams were sticky like fly-paper).After he had captured all these souls he had them packed into boxes and taken to a few huge cinemas.
There all the souls had to spend days watching special 3D motion pictures that told them what life should be like and many confusing things.
In this film they were shown false pictures and told they were God, The Devil and Christ.
In the story this process is called "implanting".When the films ended and the souls left the cinema these souls started to stick together because since they had all seen the same film they thought they were the same people.
They clustered in groups of a few thousand.
Now because there were only a few living bodies left they stayed as clusters and inhabited these bodies.As for Xenu, the Loyal Officers finally overthrew him and they locked him away in a mountain on one of the planets.
He is kept in by a force-field powered by an eternal battery and Xenu is still alive today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289342</id>
	<title>Scientology as a force for good?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259664240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the bad reputation marks against Scientology are getting a lot of press, but in defense of the poor guy getting beat up, are there any good things to say about Scientology?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the bad reputation marks against Scientology are getting a lot of press , but in defense of the poor guy getting beat up , are there any good things to say about Scientology ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the bad reputation marks against Scientology are getting a lot of press, but in defense of the poor guy getting beat up, are there any good things to say about Scientology?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295440</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259580900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I believe you have it backwards. I think the post you reference is trying to point out that there is really no reason not to treat catholicism with the same utter contempt that we treat scientology.</p></div><p>Like it or not, catholicism has much more blood on its hands than Scientology will ever be capable of.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe you have it backwards .
I think the post you reference is trying to point out that there is really no reason not to treat catholicism with the same utter contempt that we treat scientology.Like it or not , catholicism has much more blood on its hands than Scientology will ever be capable of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe you have it backwards.
I think the post you reference is trying to point out that there is really no reason not to treat catholicism with the same utter contempt that we treat scientology.Like it or not, catholicism has much more blood on its hands than Scientology will ever be capable of.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295350</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>Cederic</author>
	<datestamp>1259580180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A virgin birth is pretty easy to arrange, even with 2000 year old technology.</p><p>The hardest part is finding the virgin and a reason to do it..</p><p>I also don't think that leaders of major religions truly believe the shit they espouse. Fucking con artists the lot of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A virgin birth is pretty easy to arrange , even with 2000 year old technology.The hardest part is finding the virgin and a reason to do it..I also do n't think that leaders of major religions truly believe the shit they espouse .
Fucking con artists the lot of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A virgin birth is pretty easy to arrange, even with 2000 year old technology.The hardest part is finding the virgin and a reason to do it..I also don't think that leaders of major religions truly believe the shit they espouse.
Fucking con artists the lot of them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290102</id>
	<title>RPF</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259667300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's called Rehabilitation Project Force:<br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rehabilitation\_Project\_Force" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rehabilitation\_Project\_Force</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called Rehabilitation Project Force : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rehabilitation \ _Project \ _Force [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called Rehabilitation Project Force:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rehabilitation\_Project\_Force [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30304198</id>
	<title>Not buying it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259581020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't work for me. Can we make John Lindstein into Jane Lindstein and make her the sex slave of senior Scientologists who are possessed by the thetan of L. Ron Hubbard?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't work for me .
Can we make John Lindstein into Jane Lindstein and make her the sex slave of senior Scientologists who are possessed by the thetan of L. Ron Hubbard ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't work for me.
Can we make John Lindstein into Jane Lindstein and make her the sex slave of senior Scientologists who are possessed by the thetan of L. Ron Hubbard?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289366</id>
	<title>FLSA</title>
	<author>Lord Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1259664300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is no law against working in a compound which has barbed wire. So that sounds like some crap to feed the media.</p><p>The $50/week pay could be grounds for him to sue them for back wages, supposing he has proof that he worked more than 10 hours per week and that they only paid him $50 during such weeks.</p><p>For the slavery charge, he would need to prove that he tried to quit/leave but was forcibly prevented from doing so. Did he call the police on such occasions?</p><p>I'm thinking he may have a hard time proving his case. Accusations alone won't do it; he'll need evidence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no law against working in a compound which has barbed wire .
So that sounds like some crap to feed the media.The $ 50/week pay could be grounds for him to sue them for back wages , supposing he has proof that he worked more than 10 hours per week and that they only paid him $ 50 during such weeks.For the slavery charge , he would need to prove that he tried to quit/leave but was forcibly prevented from doing so .
Did he call the police on such occasions ? I 'm thinking he may have a hard time proving his case .
Accusations alone wo n't do it ; he 'll need evidence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no law against working in a compound which has barbed wire.
So that sounds like some crap to feed the media.The $50/week pay could be grounds for him to sue them for back wages, supposing he has proof that he worked more than 10 hours per week and that they only paid him $50 during such weeks.For the slavery charge, he would need to prove that he tried to quit/leave but was forcibly prevented from doing so.
Did he call the police on such occasions?I'm thinking he may have a hard time proving his case.
Accusations alone won't do it; he'll need evidence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292750</id>
	<title>COS only got till 2042</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259682060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then Xenu returns http://www.churchofxenu.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then Xenu returns http : //www.churchofxenu.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then Xenu returns http://www.churchofxenu.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289634</id>
	<title>Welcome to the First Church of Appliantology!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259665320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The WHITE ZONE is for loading and unloading only!</p><p>Don't you be Tarot-fied It's just a token of my extreme Don't you be Tarot-fied It's just a token of my extreme</p><p>Don't you never try to look behind my eyes You don't wanna know what they have seen Don't you never try to look behind my eyes You don't wanna know what they have seen</p><p>Some people think That if they go too far They'll never get back To where the rest of them are I might be crazy But there's one thing I know You might be surprised At what you find when ya go!</p><p>Oh oh oh Mystical Advisor What is my problem, tell me Can you see?</p><p>Well, you have nothing to fear, my son! You are a Latent Appliance Fetishist, It appears to me!</p><p>That all seems very, very strange I never craved a toaster Or a color T.V.</p><p>A Latent Appliance Fetishist Is a person who refuses to admit to his or herself That sexual gratification can only be achieved Through the use of<br>MACHINES...<br>Get the picture?</p><p>Are you telling me I should come out of the closet now Mr. Ron?</p><p>No, my son! You must go into THE CLOSET</p><p>What?</p><p>And you will have</p><p>Heh?</p><p>Hey! A lot of fun! That's where they all live So if you want an Appliance to love you You'll have to go in there 'N' get you one</p><p>Well...that seems simple enough...</p><p>Yes, but if you want a really GOOD one, You'll have to learn a foreign language...</p><p>German, for instance?</p><p>That's right... A lot of really cute ones come from over there!<br>(Fifty bucks, please)</p><p>If you been Mod-O-fied, It's an illusion, an yer in between Don't you be Tarot-fied, It's just a lot of nothin', So what can it mean?<br>If you been Mod-O-fied, It's an illusion, an yer in between Don't you be Tarot-fied, It's just a lot of nothin', So what can it mean?<br>If you been Mod-O-fied, It's an illusion, an yer in between...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The WHITE ZONE is for loading and unloading only ! Do n't you be Tarot-fied It 's just a token of my extreme Do n't you be Tarot-fied It 's just a token of my extremeDo n't you never try to look behind my eyes You do n't wan na know what they have seen Do n't you never try to look behind my eyes You do n't wan na know what they have seenSome people think That if they go too far They 'll never get back To where the rest of them are I might be crazy But there 's one thing I know You might be surprised At what you find when ya go ! Oh oh oh Mystical Advisor What is my problem , tell me Can you see ? Well , you have nothing to fear , my son !
You are a Latent Appliance Fetishist , It appears to me ! That all seems very , very strange I never craved a toaster Or a color T.V.A Latent Appliance Fetishist Is a person who refuses to admit to his or herself That sexual gratification can only be achieved Through the use ofMACHINES...Get the picture ? Are you telling me I should come out of the closet now Mr. Ron ? No , my son !
You must go into THE CLOSETWhat ? And you will haveHeh ? Hey !
A lot of fun !
That 's where they all live So if you want an Appliance to love you You 'll have to go in there 'N ' get you oneWell...that seems simple enough...Yes , but if you want a really GOOD one , You 'll have to learn a foreign language...German , for instance ? That 's right... A lot of really cute ones come from over there !
( Fifty bucks , please ) If you been Mod-O-fied , It 's an illusion , an yer in between Do n't you be Tarot-fied , It 's just a lot of nothin ' , So what can it mean ? If you been Mod-O-fied , It 's an illusion , an yer in between Do n't you be Tarot-fied , It 's just a lot of nothin ' , So what can it mean ? If you been Mod-O-fied , It 's an illusion , an yer in between.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The WHITE ZONE is for loading and unloading only!Don't you be Tarot-fied It's just a token of my extreme Don't you be Tarot-fied It's just a token of my extremeDon't you never try to look behind my eyes You don't wanna know what they have seen Don't you never try to look behind my eyes You don't wanna know what they have seenSome people think That if they go too far They'll never get back To where the rest of them are I might be crazy But there's one thing I know You might be surprised At what you find when ya go!Oh oh oh Mystical Advisor What is my problem, tell me Can you see?Well, you have nothing to fear, my son!
You are a Latent Appliance Fetishist, It appears to me!That all seems very, very strange I never craved a toaster Or a color T.V.A Latent Appliance Fetishist Is a person who refuses to admit to his or herself That sexual gratification can only be achieved Through the use ofMACHINES...Get the picture?Are you telling me I should come out of the closet now Mr. Ron?No, my son!
You must go into THE CLOSETWhat?And you will haveHeh?Hey!
A lot of fun!
That's where they all live So if you want an Appliance to love you You'll have to go in there 'N' get you oneWell...that seems simple enough...Yes, but if you want a really GOOD one, You'll have to learn a foreign language...German, for instance?That's right... A lot of really cute ones come from over there!
(Fifty bucks, please)If you been Mod-O-fied, It's an illusion, an yer in between Don't you be Tarot-fied, It's just a lot of nothin', So what can it mean?If you been Mod-O-fied, It's an illusion, an yer in between Don't you be Tarot-fied, It's just a lot of nothin', So what can it mean?If you been Mod-O-fied, It's an illusion, an yer in between...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292308</id>
	<title>Re:No difference than the Christian cult</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259678700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yeah, my parents had me in church a lot as a kid. As an adult, I pretty much stopped going. Know what? My mom still likes me and I still have plenty of friends who go to church, and as far as I know none of them have shunned me as a pariah. I don't think you can really give a group "cult" status when there's no penalty for leaving and they're still nice to you afterward.</p></div><p>Agreed, cult is when you are ostracized for leaving.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , my parents had me in church a lot as a kid .
As an adult , I pretty much stopped going .
Know what ?
My mom still likes me and I still have plenty of friends who go to church , and as far as I know none of them have shunned me as a pariah .
I do n't think you can really give a group " cult " status when there 's no penalty for leaving and they 're still nice to you afterward.Agreed , cult is when you are ostracized for leaving .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, my parents had me in church a lot as a kid.
As an adult, I pretty much stopped going.
Know what?
My mom still likes me and I still have plenty of friends who go to church, and as far as I know none of them have shunned me as a pariah.
I don't think you can really give a group "cult" status when there's no penalty for leaving and they're still nice to you afterward.Agreed, cult is when you are ostracized for leaving.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290278</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289658</id>
	<title>Flash mob at the gold base?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259665440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Gold Base would be a GREAT place for a flash mob.
<a href="http://bit.ly/4ZyrZz" title="bit.ly" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4ZyrZz</a> [bit.ly] : Replies denote interest.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gold Base would be a GREAT place for a flash mob .
http : //bit.ly/4ZyrZz [ bit.ly ] : Replies denote interest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gold Base would be a GREAT place for a flash mob.
http://bit.ly/4ZyrZz [bit.ly] : Replies denote interest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290600</id>
	<title>Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave"</title>
	<author>Tiger4</author>
	<datestamp>1259669700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps you do, and you might be moraly right.  But at least in the US, the military draft was not ended by the national ban on slavery.  The US federal courts and Supreme Court <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13th\_Amendment\_to\_the\_United\_States\_Constitution#Involuntary\_servitude" title="wikipedia.org">ruled</a> [wikipedia.org] it was not <a href="http://supreme.justia.com/us/245/366/case.html" title="justia.com">covered</a> [justia.com], and the draft continued off and on for another 110 years after the 13th Amendment.  Other nations take pretty much the same attitude.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps you do , and you might be moraly right .
But at least in the US , the military draft was not ended by the national ban on slavery .
The US federal courts and Supreme Court ruled [ wikipedia.org ] it was not covered [ justia.com ] , and the draft continued off and on for another 110 years after the 13th Amendment .
Other nations take pretty much the same attitude .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps you do, and you might be moraly right.
But at least in the US, the military draft was not ended by the national ban on slavery.
The US federal courts and Supreme Court ruled [wikipedia.org] it was not covered [justia.com], and the draft continued off and on for another 110 years after the 13th Amendment.
Other nations take pretty much the same attitude.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291132</id>
	<title>Re:Scientology as a force for good?</title>
	<author>Cal27</author>
	<datestamp>1259672100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well... it's better than vista.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well... it 's better than vista .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well... it's better than vista.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292456</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>Miamicanes</author>
	<datestamp>1259679780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; So how are they not a religion?</p><p>Name a single mainstream religion, practiced anywhere in the world, whose core, sacred beliefs are aggressively guarded by the holy writ of copyright law and a small army of lawyers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; So how are they not a religion ? Name a single mainstream religion , practiced anywhere in the world , whose core , sacred beliefs are aggressively guarded by the holy writ of copyright law and a small army of lawyers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; So how are they not a religion?Name a single mainstream religion, practiced anywhere in the world, whose core, sacred beliefs are aggressively guarded by the holy writ of copyright law and a small army of lawyers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292838</id>
	<title>This guy doesn't have a chance of winning...</title>
	<author>Neffirithion</author>
	<datestamp>1259682660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... cause they will get to court and he will have to admit he couldn't find Xenu to serve him properly...</htmltext>
<tokenext>... cause they will get to court and he will have to admit he could n't find Xenu to serve him properly.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... cause they will get to court and he will have to admit he couldn't find Xenu to serve him properly...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292468</id>
	<title>Re:Gold Base (Gilman Springs, CA)</title>
	<author>Buelldozer</author>
	<datestamp>1259679900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is that a prison to the south surrounded by Sublette Road? Because that's sure as heck what it looks like! It follows all the classic prison design rules.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that a prison to the south surrounded by Sublette Road ?
Because that 's sure as heck what it looks like !
It follows all the classic prison design rules .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that a prison to the south surrounded by Sublette Road?
Because that's sure as heck what it looks like!
It follows all the classic prison design rules.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30294608</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>modustollens</author>
	<datestamp>1259613180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjO4duhMRZk&amp;feature=related" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjO4duhMRZk&amp;feature=related</a> [youtube.com]

i suppose that can apply to this cult too...</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = yjO4duhMRZk&amp;feature = related [ youtube.com ] i suppose that can apply to this cult too.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjO4duhMRZk&amp;feature=related [youtube.com]

i suppose that can apply to this cult too...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289214</id>
	<title>Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259663640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Slaves aren't paid, last I checked. Did he file a 1099?</p></div><p>1. Force people to work for you<br>
2. Pay them 1 cent a year as an annual salary<br>
3. Hire  as your lawyer<br>
4. Profit<br>
<br>
Something isn't right, isn't there suppose to be a '???"' somewhere.  Oh well...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Slaves are n't paid , last I checked .
Did he file a 1099 ? 1 .
Force people to work for you 2 .
Pay them 1 cent a year as an annual salary 3 .
Hire as your lawyer 4 .
Profit Something is n't right , is n't there suppose to be a ' ? ? ?
" ' somewhere .
Oh well.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slaves aren't paid, last I checked.
Did he file a 1099?1.
Force people to work for you
2.
Pay them 1 cent a year as an annual salary
3.
Hire  as your lawyer
4.
Profit

Something isn't right, isn't there suppose to be a '???
"' somewhere.
Oh well...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290620</id>
	<title>Wage and Hour?</title>
	<author>BlueBoxSW.com</author>
	<datestamp>1259669760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really? It took Wage and Hour to bring down these guys?</p><p>WTF?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
It took Wage and Hour to bring down these guys ? WTF ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
It took Wage and Hour to bring down these guys?WTF?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290120</id>
	<title>Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259667360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>What are you a scientoligist?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What are you a scientoligist ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What are you a scientoligist?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292064</id>
	<title>Re:FLSA</title>
	<author>Scrameustache</author>
	<datestamp>1259677260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There is no law against working in a compound which has barbed wire. [...] For the slavery charge, he would need to prove that he tried to quit/leave but was forcibly prevented from doing so.</p></div><p>Read that back a few times, until it dawns on you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no law against working in a compound which has barbed wire .
[ ... ] For the slavery charge , he would need to prove that he tried to quit/leave but was forcibly prevented from doing so.Read that back a few times , until it dawns on you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no law against working in a compound which has barbed wire.
[...] For the slavery charge, he would need to prove that he tried to quit/leave but was forcibly prevented from doing so.Read that back a few times, until it dawns on you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291532</id>
	<title>Re:FLSA</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1259674140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Urmmm, according to TFA he was 8 years old when it started. That changes things a great deal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Urmmm , according to TFA he was 8 years old when it started .
That changes things a great deal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Urmmm, according to TFA he was 8 years old when it started.
That changes things a great deal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30294502</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259611800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed, but Catholicism has enslaved many more souls than Scientology has. There are no keys to heaven. No gates or walls either, only the Pope's ring. IMO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed , but Catholicism has enslaved many more souls than Scientology has .
There are no keys to heaven .
No gates or walls either , only the Pope 's ring .
IMO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed, but Catholicism has enslaved many more souls than Scientology has.
There are no keys to heaven.
No gates or walls either, only the Pope's ring.
IMO.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289586</id>
	<title>Wow, maybe there's hope...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259665140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that they'll finally free Katie Holmes!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that they 'll finally free Katie Holmes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that they'll finally free Katie Holmes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292372</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259679120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Religion is free, Scientology is not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Religion is free , Scientology is not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Religion is free, Scientology is not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290668</id>
	<title>Re:Scientology as a force for good?</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1259669940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have you ever put a square mustache on El Ron?  It'll shock the thetans right out of you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you ever put a square mustache on El Ron ?
It 'll shock the thetans right out of you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you ever put a square mustache on El Ron?
It'll shock the thetans right out of you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291724</id>
	<title>Re:No difference than the Christian cult</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259675280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least in the USA, parents have the right to decide where their children may and may not go and even to force them to be present in particular places (school, and in many cases church). Minors have virtually no rights except the right to speak up, and if you never protested your parents forcing you to go to church, you don't have much ground complaining about it. Working as an altar boy? How many hours a week were you forced to work, and what was the nature of that work?</p><p>Brainwashed... repetitive sayings and actions are one of the better teaching tools for anything that serves well to be memorized or known by rote. Go to any schoolchild and ask them the multiplication tables or the alphabet, and you see what 'brainwashing' repetitive sayings are. I won't argue that there are other methods of learning, but by your own reasoning, american public schools are a cult:</p><p>[1] Children are forced to attend every week day for some 36 or so weeks out of the year, and forced to do menial mental exercises even after they leave and sometimes even on the weekend.<br>[2] Children are taught by repetitive application of chants (ABCs, multiplication tables), exercises, etc. which may or may not include a brainwashing oath to a piece of cloth (Pledge of Allegiance) and anthem to their homeland ("The Star Spangled Banner", "America The Beautiful", etc.).</p><p>By your own standards of being forced to go regularly, being indoctrinated and forced to do work, and being brainwashed by repetition of speech and action, this is a cult. Will you then rebut that an organization must be religious or spiritually oriented to be a cult? And if I told you that such tactics were used as a sort of "state religion" teaching children to submit to and follow the government as completely as a godhead, would that then satisfy your parameters? (Note: I do not believe public schools in the USA to be teaching in this way or towards this end, though they could just as easily do so with little change in their methods or curricula)</p><p>At what point do we draw the line if we say all organizations are cults? At what point do we draw the line between political and religious organizations for this purpose?</p><p>Now I will admit, I did grow up in a Christian household, was dragged to church at least once weekly, and as I got older, often two or more times during the week, and to be bluntly honest: I enjoyed most of it. I disliked it at times, but for the most part I enjoyed the services (excepting the sermon; I hate all sorts of lectures, though), and I enjoyed the opportunity Sunday School and the church youth groups gave me to actually interact with people in a way I never got to do at school, simply because I knew most of them had something in common with me. Do I miss it, though, now that I no longer attend services or participate in it?</p><p>Nope. And none of my family or friends from church have given up on me or abandoned me because I stopped going. And, unlike some other religions, i'm free to simply say I'm no longer of the faith i was raised in. Unlike some, I am free to live among heathens or infidels or sinners and not attend but still be a Christian. Most importantly, unlike the "Church" in question here, I am free to be a member of the Christian church and still hang out with those who question or doubt the beliefs of my chosen faith without being labeled a "potential trouble source". I can choose whether or not I wish to "volunteer" for my church, and though they are free to try guilting me into it, the choice is ultimately mine.</p><p>Cults in the modern sense are oppressive and controlling, and in many cases they seek to manipulate their members for the cult leader's (or leaders') gain. In the CoS, that gain is financial, and their chosen path of manipulation is to isolate and reduce their members to a state where they no longer feel human and then use these nearly dehumanized drones to their limits. R2-45? Nobody is going to try to kill me if I walk into my church and denounce my faith! The worst my church can do is kick me out of th</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least in the USA , parents have the right to decide where their children may and may not go and even to force them to be present in particular places ( school , and in many cases church ) .
Minors have virtually no rights except the right to speak up , and if you never protested your parents forcing you to go to church , you do n't have much ground complaining about it .
Working as an altar boy ?
How many hours a week were you forced to work , and what was the nature of that work ? Brainwashed... repetitive sayings and actions are one of the better teaching tools for anything that serves well to be memorized or known by rote .
Go to any schoolchild and ask them the multiplication tables or the alphabet , and you see what 'brainwashing ' repetitive sayings are .
I wo n't argue that there are other methods of learning , but by your own reasoning , american public schools are a cult : [ 1 ] Children are forced to attend every week day for some 36 or so weeks out of the year , and forced to do menial mental exercises even after they leave and sometimes even on the weekend .
[ 2 ] Children are taught by repetitive application of chants ( ABCs , multiplication tables ) , exercises , etc .
which may or may not include a brainwashing oath to a piece of cloth ( Pledge of Allegiance ) and anthem to their homeland ( " The Star Spangled Banner " , " America The Beautiful " , etc .
) .By your own standards of being forced to go regularly , being indoctrinated and forced to do work , and being brainwashed by repetition of speech and action , this is a cult .
Will you then rebut that an organization must be religious or spiritually oriented to be a cult ?
And if I told you that such tactics were used as a sort of " state religion " teaching children to submit to and follow the government as completely as a godhead , would that then satisfy your parameters ?
( Note : I do not believe public schools in the USA to be teaching in this way or towards this end , though they could just as easily do so with little change in their methods or curricula ) At what point do we draw the line if we say all organizations are cults ?
At what point do we draw the line between political and religious organizations for this purpose ? Now I will admit , I did grow up in a Christian household , was dragged to church at least once weekly , and as I got older , often two or more times during the week , and to be bluntly honest : I enjoyed most of it .
I disliked it at times , but for the most part I enjoyed the services ( excepting the sermon ; I hate all sorts of lectures , though ) , and I enjoyed the opportunity Sunday School and the church youth groups gave me to actually interact with people in a way I never got to do at school , simply because I knew most of them had something in common with me .
Do I miss it , though , now that I no longer attend services or participate in it ? Nope .
And none of my family or friends from church have given up on me or abandoned me because I stopped going .
And , unlike some other religions , i 'm free to simply say I 'm no longer of the faith i was raised in .
Unlike some , I am free to live among heathens or infidels or sinners and not attend but still be a Christian .
Most importantly , unlike the " Church " in question here , I am free to be a member of the Christian church and still hang out with those who question or doubt the beliefs of my chosen faith without being labeled a " potential trouble source " .
I can choose whether or not I wish to " volunteer " for my church , and though they are free to try guilting me into it , the choice is ultimately mine.Cults in the modern sense are oppressive and controlling , and in many cases they seek to manipulate their members for the cult leader 's ( or leaders ' ) gain .
In the CoS , that gain is financial , and their chosen path of manipulation is to isolate and reduce their members to a state where they no longer feel human and then use these nearly dehumanized drones to their limits .
R2-45 ? Nobody is going to try to kill me if I walk into my church and denounce my faith !
The worst my church can do is kick me out of th</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least in the USA, parents have the right to decide where their children may and may not go and even to force them to be present in particular places (school, and in many cases church).
Minors have virtually no rights except the right to speak up, and if you never protested your parents forcing you to go to church, you don't have much ground complaining about it.
Working as an altar boy?
How many hours a week were you forced to work, and what was the nature of that work?Brainwashed... repetitive sayings and actions are one of the better teaching tools for anything that serves well to be memorized or known by rote.
Go to any schoolchild and ask them the multiplication tables or the alphabet, and you see what 'brainwashing' repetitive sayings are.
I won't argue that there are other methods of learning, but by your own reasoning, american public schools are a cult:[1] Children are forced to attend every week day for some 36 or so weeks out of the year, and forced to do menial mental exercises even after they leave and sometimes even on the weekend.
[2] Children are taught by repetitive application of chants (ABCs, multiplication tables), exercises, etc.
which may or may not include a brainwashing oath to a piece of cloth (Pledge of Allegiance) and anthem to their homeland ("The Star Spangled Banner", "America The Beautiful", etc.
).By your own standards of being forced to go regularly, being indoctrinated and forced to do work, and being brainwashed by repetition of speech and action, this is a cult.
Will you then rebut that an organization must be religious or spiritually oriented to be a cult?
And if I told you that such tactics were used as a sort of "state religion" teaching children to submit to and follow the government as completely as a godhead, would that then satisfy your parameters?
(Note: I do not believe public schools in the USA to be teaching in this way or towards this end, though they could just as easily do so with little change in their methods or curricula)At what point do we draw the line if we say all organizations are cults?
At what point do we draw the line between political and religious organizations for this purpose?Now I will admit, I did grow up in a Christian household, was dragged to church at least once weekly, and as I got older, often two or more times during the week, and to be bluntly honest: I enjoyed most of it.
I disliked it at times, but for the most part I enjoyed the services (excepting the sermon; I hate all sorts of lectures, though), and I enjoyed the opportunity Sunday School and the church youth groups gave me to actually interact with people in a way I never got to do at school, simply because I knew most of them had something in common with me.
Do I miss it, though, now that I no longer attend services or participate in it?Nope.
And none of my family or friends from church have given up on me or abandoned me because I stopped going.
And, unlike some other religions, i'm free to simply say I'm no longer of the faith i was raised in.
Unlike some, I am free to live among heathens or infidels or sinners and not attend but still be a Christian.
Most importantly, unlike the "Church" in question here, I am free to be a member of the Christian church and still hang out with those who question or doubt the beliefs of my chosen faith without being labeled a "potential trouble source".
I can choose whether or not I wish to "volunteer" for my church, and though they are free to try guilting me into it, the choice is ultimately mine.Cults in the modern sense are oppressive and controlling, and in many cases they seek to manipulate their members for the cult leader's (or leaders') gain.
In the CoS, that gain is financial, and their chosen path of manipulation is to isolate and reduce their members to a state where they no longer feel human and then use these nearly dehumanized drones to their limits.
R2-45? Nobody is going to try to kill me if I walk into my church and denounce my faith!
The worst my church can do is kick me out of th</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289914</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259666400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Let's stick to the topic at hand, shall we?</p></div><p>Well, not everyone is using <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/12/01/1743252/Verizon-Changes-FiOS-AUP--1-Offtopic?art\_pos=6" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">Verizon's FiOS</a> [slashdot.org], like you are.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's stick to the topic at hand , shall we ? Well , not everyone is using Verizon 's FiOS [ slashdot.org ] , like you are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's stick to the topic at hand, shall we?Well, not everyone is using Verizon's FiOS [slashdot.org], like you are.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292630</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>lennier</author>
	<datestamp>1259681040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"They are a money making / power grabbing scheme dreamed up by a second rate megalomaniac science fiction author that has now taken on a life of its own."</p><p>I've often wondered about the parallels between L Ron Hubbard and Gene Roddenberry.</p><p>Both ended up creating science-fiction themed military-naval organisations with hordes of loyal fans that generate tons of money...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" They are a money making / power grabbing scheme dreamed up by a second rate megalomaniac science fiction author that has now taken on a life of its own .
" I 've often wondered about the parallels between L Ron Hubbard and Gene Roddenberry.Both ended up creating science-fiction themed military-naval organisations with hordes of loyal fans that generate tons of money.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"They are a money making / power grabbing scheme dreamed up by a second rate megalomaniac science fiction author that has now taken on a life of its own.
"I've often wondered about the parallels between L Ron Hubbard and Gene Roddenberry.Both ended up creating science-fiction themed military-naval organisations with hordes of loyal fans that generate tons of money...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292668</id>
	<title>I Predict A Bright Future</title>
	<author>dynamator</author>
	<datestamp>1259681280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><strong>
From TFA:
</strong>
<br>
<em>
"By age 16, Lindstein says, he was working for Golden Era Productions, Scientology's film production company, restoring Hubbard's films from the 1970s. He says he often worked 24-hour days at the "tedious, frame-by-frame work<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...."
</em>
<br>
<strong>
This lad is well prepared for a career in visual effects.
</strong></htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : " By age 16 , Lindstein says , he was working for Golden Era Productions , Scientology 's film production company , restoring Hubbard 's films from the 1970s .
He says he often worked 24-hour days at the " tedious , frame-by-frame work .... " This lad is well prepared for a career in visual effects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
From TFA:



"By age 16, Lindstein says, he was working for Golden Era Productions, Scientology's film production company, restoring Hubbard's films from the 1970s.
He says he often worked 24-hour days at the "tedious, frame-by-frame work ...."



This lad is well prepared for a career in visual effects.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289500</id>
	<title>Re:How Is This Nerd News??!!</title>
	<author>multisync</author>
	<datestamp>1259664780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Please stop this Scientology bashing. We know its a kooky scam, but it sure as hell doesn't belong on this site</p></div></blockquote><p>Hmmm<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>You don't think a story about a religion that was founded by a science fiction writer, teaches that we are from some other planet and uses something called an "E-meter" to locate and eliminate "engrams" in its followers belongs on Slashdot?</p><p>I must be new here.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please stop this Scientology bashing .
We know its a kooky scam , but it sure as hell does n't belong on this siteHmmm ...You do n't think a story about a religion that was founded by a science fiction writer , teaches that we are from some other planet and uses something called an " E-meter " to locate and eliminate " engrams " in its followers belongs on Slashdot ? I must be new here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please stop this Scientology bashing.
We know its a kooky scam, but it sure as hell doesn't belong on this siteHmmm ...You don't think a story about a religion that was founded by a science fiction writer, teaches that we are from some other planet and uses something called an "E-meter" to locate and eliminate "engrams" in its followers belongs on Slashdot?I must be new here.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291978</id>
	<title>Re:FLSA</title>
	<author>StarWreck</author>
	<datestamp>1259676720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's plenty of evidence that Scientology will go out of their way to prevent you from leaving when you work for them.  Including: Locking you in a cage.

Read "Blown for Good"</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's plenty of evidence that Scientology will go out of their way to prevent you from leaving when you work for them .
Including : Locking you in a cage .
Read " Blown for Good "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's plenty of evidence that Scientology will go out of their way to prevent you from leaving when you work for them.
Including: Locking you in a cage.
Read "Blown for Good"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259666580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Hmm, how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism, trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?</p></div></blockquote><p>
I believe you have it backwards. I think the post you reference is trying to point out that there is really no reason not to treat catholicism with the same utter contempt that we treat scientology.<br>
I personally think it should be taken one step further than that. <b>All organized religion should be treated with utter contempt.</b></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism , trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion ?
I believe you have it backwards .
I think the post you reference is trying to point out that there is really no reason not to treat catholicism with the same utter contempt that we treat scientology .
I personally think it should be taken one step further than that .
All organized religion should be treated with utter contempt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism, trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?
I believe you have it backwards.
I think the post you reference is trying to point out that there is really no reason not to treat catholicism with the same utter contempt that we treat scientology.
I personally think it should be taken one step further than that.
All organized religion should be treated with utter contempt.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293748</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>Meski</author>
	<datestamp>1259691060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We're working on not recognising them as a religion, but they're fighting back.  google xenophon senator scientology<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're working on not recognising them as a religion , but they 're fighting back .
google xenophon senator scientology .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're working on not recognising them as a religion, but they're fighting back.
google xenophon senator scientology ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30297912</id>
	<title>Re:Gold Base (Gilman Springs, CA)</title>
	<author>doug141</author>
	<datestamp>1259599680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>surrounded by a barbed-wire fence facing inward! </i></p></div> </blockquote><p>

It's common for barbed wire fences to be installed wrong, just look around businesses in your neighborhood. I don't know if it's plain ignorance, or a desire to put the fence at the limit of the property and remain in one's airspace, or both. A look at the nature of the businesses doing this makes it clear it's not always a nefarious desire to keep people in.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>surrounded by a barbed-wire fence facing inward !
It 's common for barbed wire fences to be installed wrong , just look around businesses in your neighborhood .
I do n't know if it 's plain ignorance , or a desire to put the fence at the limit of the property and remain in one 's airspace , or both .
A look at the nature of the businesses doing this makes it clear it 's not always a nefarious desire to keep people in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> surrounded by a barbed-wire fence facing inward!
It's common for barbed wire fences to be installed wrong, just look around businesses in your neighborhood.
I don't know if it's plain ignorance, or a desire to put the fence at the limit of the property and remain in one's airspace, or both.
A look at the nature of the businesses doing this makes it clear it's not always a nefarious desire to keep people in.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289934</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259666520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>diverting attention to Catholicism, trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?</p></div><p>I think the posts diverting attention to Catholicism are trying more to discredit Catholicism by comparing it to a cult than the other way around.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>diverting attention to Catholicism , trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion ? I think the posts diverting attention to Catholicism are trying more to discredit Catholicism by comparing it to a cult than the other way around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>diverting attention to Catholicism, trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?I think the posts diverting attention to Catholicism are trying more to discredit Catholicism by comparing it to a cult than the other way around.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289548</id>
	<title>Re:How Is This Nerd News??!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259664960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Scientology has become relevant to Slashdot and its readership ever since <a href="http://slashdot.org/yro/01/03/16/1256226.shtml?tid=153" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">CoS removed content from Slashdot under DMCA</a> [slashdot.org]. It's quote  obviously News for Nerds now, and, noting the DMCA reference (and the fact that it's common CoS practice, not a single isolated case), definitely related to Your Rights Online. If it's still not clear, try posting <b>OT-III</b> materials in a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. comments and see how that goes.</p></div><p>
<b>O</b>ff <b>T</b>opic level <b>III</b>?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Scientology has become relevant to Slashdot and its readership ever since CoS removed content from Slashdot under DMCA [ slashdot.org ] .
It 's quote obviously News for Nerds now , and , noting the DMCA reference ( and the fact that it 's common CoS practice , not a single isolated case ) , definitely related to Your Rights Online .
If it 's still not clear , try posting OT-III materials in a / .
comments and see how that goes .
Off Topic level III ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scientology has become relevant to Slashdot and its readership ever since CoS removed content from Slashdot under DMCA [slashdot.org].
It's quote  obviously News for Nerds now, and, noting the DMCA reference (and the fact that it's common CoS practice, not a single isolated case), definitely related to Your Rights Online.
If it's still not clear, try posting OT-III materials in a /.
comments and see how that goes.
Off Topic level III?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298900</id>
	<title>Re:No difference than the Christian cult</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259604180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I call 100\% bologna. You are obviously a kid dealing with puberty.</p><p>Be mad at your parents in your own time and quit making up crap on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p><p>The Internet just got a little dumber with your comment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I call 100 \ % bologna .
You are obviously a kid dealing with puberty.Be mad at your parents in your own time and quit making up crap on /.The Internet just got a little dumber with your comment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call 100\% bologna.
You are obviously a kid dealing with puberty.Be mad at your parents in your own time and quit making up crap on /.The Internet just got a little dumber with your comment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290278</id>
	<title>Re:No difference than the Christian cult</title>
	<author>Just Some Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1259668080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, my parents had me in church a lot as a kid. As an adult, I pretty much stopped going. Know what? My mom still likes me and I still have plenty of friends who go to church, and as far as I know none of them have shunned me as a pariah. I don't think you can really give a group "cult" status when there's no penalty for leaving and they're still nice to you afterward.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , my parents had me in church a lot as a kid .
As an adult , I pretty much stopped going .
Know what ?
My mom still likes me and I still have plenty of friends who go to church , and as far as I know none of them have shunned me as a pariah .
I do n't think you can really give a group " cult " status when there 's no penalty for leaving and they 're still nice to you afterward .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, my parents had me in church a lot as a kid.
As an adult, I pretty much stopped going.
Know what?
My mom still likes me and I still have plenty of friends who go to church, and as far as I know none of them have shunned me as a pariah.
I don't think you can really give a group "cult" status when there's no penalty for leaving and they're still nice to you afterward.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289626</id>
	<title>ok</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259665320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://88.80.16.63/leak/scientology-ot-levels.pdf" title="88.80.16.63" rel="nofollow">link 1</a> [88.80.16.63] <br>
<a href="http://wikileaks.fi/leak/scientology-ot-levels.pdf" title="wikileaks.fi" rel="nofollow">link 2</a> [wikileaks.fi] <br>
<a href="http://wikileaks.eu/leak/scientology-ot-levels.pdf" title="wikileaks.eu" rel="nofollow">link 3</a> [wikileaks.eu] <br> <br>

<i>
"If you want to control your child, simply break him into complete apathy and he'll be as obedient as any hypnotized half-wit. If you want to know how to control him, get a book on dog training, name the child Rex and teach him first to "fetch" and then to "sit up" and then to bark for his food. You can train a child that way. Sure you can. But it's your hard luck if he turns out to be a blood-letter. Only don't be half-hearted about it. Simply TRAIN him. "Speak, Roger!" "Lie down!" "Roll over!" Of course, you'll have a hard time of it. This - a slight oversight - is a human being. You'd better charge right in and do what you can to break him into apathy quickly. A club is best. Tying him in a closet without food for a few days is fairly successful. The best recommended tactic, however, is simply to use a straight jacket and muffs on him until he is docile and imbecilic. I'm warning you that it's going to be tough; it will be tough because Man became king of the beasts only because he couldn't as a species be licked. He doesn't easily go into an obedient apathy like dogs do. Men own dogs because men are self-determined and dogs aren't.
 </i>
--Official church documents
<br> <br>I got nothing better going on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>link 1 [ 88.80.16.63 ] link 2 [ wikileaks.fi ] link 3 [ wikileaks.eu ] " If you want to control your child , simply break him into complete apathy and he 'll be as obedient as any hypnotized half-wit .
If you want to know how to control him , get a book on dog training , name the child Rex and teach him first to " fetch " and then to " sit up " and then to bark for his food .
You can train a child that way .
Sure you can .
But it 's your hard luck if he turns out to be a blood-letter .
Only do n't be half-hearted about it .
Simply TRAIN him .
" Speak , Roger !
" " Lie down !
" " Roll over !
" Of course , you 'll have a hard time of it .
This - a slight oversight - is a human being .
You 'd better charge right in and do what you can to break him into apathy quickly .
A club is best .
Tying him in a closet without food for a few days is fairly successful .
The best recommended tactic , however , is simply to use a straight jacket and muffs on him until he is docile and imbecilic .
I 'm warning you that it 's going to be tough ; it will be tough because Man became king of the beasts only because he could n't as a species be licked .
He does n't easily go into an obedient apathy like dogs do .
Men own dogs because men are self-determined and dogs are n't .
--Official church documents I got nothing better going on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>link 1 [88.80.16.63] 
link 2 [wikileaks.fi] 
link 3 [wikileaks.eu]  


"If you want to control your child, simply break him into complete apathy and he'll be as obedient as any hypnotized half-wit.
If you want to know how to control him, get a book on dog training, name the child Rex and teach him first to "fetch" and then to "sit up" and then to bark for his food.
You can train a child that way.
Sure you can.
But it's your hard luck if he turns out to be a blood-letter.
Only don't be half-hearted about it.
Simply TRAIN him.
"Speak, Roger!
" "Lie down!
" "Roll over!
" Of course, you'll have a hard time of it.
This - a slight oversight - is a human being.
You'd better charge right in and do what you can to break him into apathy quickly.
A club is best.
Tying him in a closet without food for a few days is fairly successful.
The best recommended tactic, however, is simply to use a straight jacket and muffs on him until he is docile and imbecilic.
I'm warning you that it's going to be tough; it will be tough because Man became king of the beasts only because he couldn't as a species be licked.
He doesn't easily go into an obedient apathy like dogs do.
Men own dogs because men are self-determined and dogs aren't.
--Official church documents
 I got nothing better going on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290740</id>
	<title>Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259670300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a slave you get to live, you can also call that as compensation, add 50 bucks you get double the value<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... don't downplay it too much</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a slave you get to live , you can also call that as compensation , add 50 bucks you get double the value ... do n't downplay it too much</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a slave you get to live, you can also call that as compensation, add 50 bucks you get double the value ... don't downplay it too much</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289336</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290946</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>element-o.p.</author>
	<datestamp>1259671200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Baby...bathwater?
<br> <br>
Yes, individuals -- and even rather large groups of individuals -- have abused faith for personal gain.  I personally believe there is an especially toasty corner of Hell reserved for such as those.
<br> <br>
However, even the most jaded, cynical atheist cannot deny that organized religions have also done some amazing things for the societies in which they existed.  Read about <a href="http://www.providence.org/alaska/community/history.htm" title="providence.org">Sisters of Providence and Providence Hospital</a> [providence.org].  Or perhaps the Brother Francis shelter in Anchorage Alaska.  How about Catholic Social Services?  The church where I am a youth pastor spent the last four weeks feeding the homeless at another church downtown.  YMMV, but I have seen religion lift people out of some very, very dark places and empower others to do things they never would have been brave enough to try otherwise.
<br> <br>
With all due respect, saying that &quot;all organized religion should be treated with utter contempt&quot; is every bit as ignorant and superficial as claiming that someone cannot drive because their plumbing is different than mine or that someone has no value because they have a significantly better tan than I do.  Prejudice is prejudice, period.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Baby...bathwater ?
Yes , individuals -- and even rather large groups of individuals -- have abused faith for personal gain .
I personally believe there is an especially toasty corner of Hell reserved for such as those .
However , even the most jaded , cynical atheist can not deny that organized religions have also done some amazing things for the societies in which they existed .
Read about Sisters of Providence and Providence Hospital [ providence.org ] .
Or perhaps the Brother Francis shelter in Anchorage Alaska .
How about Catholic Social Services ?
The church where I am a youth pastor spent the last four weeks feeding the homeless at another church downtown .
YMMV , but I have seen religion lift people out of some very , very dark places and empower others to do things they never would have been brave enough to try otherwise .
With all due respect , saying that " all organized religion should be treated with utter contempt " is every bit as ignorant and superficial as claiming that someone can not drive because their plumbing is different than mine or that someone has no value because they have a significantly better tan than I do .
Prejudice is prejudice , period .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Baby...bathwater?
Yes, individuals -- and even rather large groups of individuals -- have abused faith for personal gain.
I personally believe there is an especially toasty corner of Hell reserved for such as those.
However, even the most jaded, cynical atheist cannot deny that organized religions have also done some amazing things for the societies in which they existed.
Read about Sisters of Providence and Providence Hospital [providence.org].
Or perhaps the Brother Francis shelter in Anchorage Alaska.
How about Catholic Social Services?
The church where I am a youth pastor spent the last four weeks feeding the homeless at another church downtown.
YMMV, but I have seen religion lift people out of some very, very dark places and empower others to do things they never would have been brave enough to try otherwise.
With all due respect, saying that "all organized religion should be treated with utter contempt" is every bit as ignorant and superficial as claiming that someone cannot drive because their plumbing is different than mine or that someone has no value because they have a significantly better tan than I do.
Prejudice is prejudice, period.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289184</id>
	<title>two words</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1259663460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>hell yeah!</htmltext>
<tokenext>hell yeah !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hell yeah!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290434</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>flyingfsck</author>
	<datestamp>1259668860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ewww, catholicism doesn't exactly have a good name either.  The Catholic Church has been a war lusting, child molesting scam for almost 2000 years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ewww , catholicism does n't exactly have a good name either .
The Catholic Church has been a war lusting , child molesting scam for almost 2000 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ewww, catholicism doesn't exactly have a good name either.
The Catholic Church has been a war lusting, child molesting scam for almost 2000 years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290366</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>madprof</author>
	<datestamp>1259668500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Er, killed a load of people and set fire to the compound.</p><p>That is what you might consider "pretty harsh".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Er , killed a load of people and set fire to the compound.That is what you might consider " pretty harsh " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Er, killed a load of people and set fire to the compound.That is what you might consider "pretty harsh".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298518</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>LanMan04</author>
	<datestamp>1259602560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, that makes me sick to my stomach.  Literally.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , that makes me sick to my stomach .
Literally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, that makes me sick to my stomach.
Literally.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194</id>
	<title>That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>FatSean</author>
	<datestamp>1259663520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First the Catholics with child rape, now the Scientologists with slavery and human trafficking.</p><p>Any wagers on which one true religion will be busted next?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First the Catholics with child rape , now the Scientologists with slavery and human trafficking.Any wagers on which one true religion will be busted next ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First the Catholics with child rape, now the Scientologists with slavery and human trafficking.Any wagers on which one true religion will be busted next?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291492</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>dbIII</author>
	<datestamp>1259673960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Hmm, how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism, trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?</p></div></blockquote><p>Australia had a court case like that that played right into the hands of this Dianetics scam with a new name.  It didn't help that the lapsed Catholic Judge wanted to take a dig at real religeons by comparing them with these scammers.<br>The deliberately try to escalate these disputes into Church vs State instead of organised crime vs State.<br>We should give up on their trap of trying to define religeon and showing they are not because we've seen where this scam has come from.  They've had decades to some up with confusing arguments and can play the game for years and get all kinds of unlikely allies on their side if they frame it as Church vs State.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism , trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion ? Australia had a court case like that that played right into the hands of this Dianetics scam with a new name .
It did n't help that the lapsed Catholic Judge wanted to take a dig at real religeons by comparing them with these scammers.The deliberately try to escalate these disputes into Church vs State instead of organised crime vs State.We should give up on their trap of trying to define religeon and showing they are not because we 've seen where this scam has come from .
They 've had decades to some up with confusing arguments and can play the game for years and get all kinds of unlikely allies on their side if they frame it as Church vs State .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism, trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?Australia had a court case like that that played right into the hands of this Dianetics scam with a new name.
It didn't help that the lapsed Catholic Judge wanted to take a dig at real religeons by comparing them with these scammers.The deliberately try to escalate these disputes into Church vs State instead of organised crime vs State.We should give up on their trap of trying to define religeon and showing they are not because we've seen where this scam has come from.
They've had decades to some up with confusing arguments and can play the game for years and get all kinds of unlikely allies on their side if they frame it as Church vs State.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289568</id>
	<title>Umm... Age?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259665080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about child labor laws?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about child labor laws ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about child labor laws?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292708</id>
	<title>have you ever heard of frederick douglas?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259681580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>slashdotters spend their whole life shitting on the 'worthless humanities', but then cannot even correctly state the basic fundamental facts of major themes in history.</p><p>frederick douglas and many other slaves got payed. they didnt get payed much but they got payed. some were even able to buy themselves out of slavery. not many though. it didn't save him from being beaten, from watching other slaves get shot lynched and murdered, etc.</p><p>perhaps you should drop the camel or aardvark book and pick up 'narrative of the life of frederick douglas'. your ignorance is truly embarassing.</p><p>the people who voted this +4 funny should also be ashamed of their ignorance and stupidity. just because someone is a sarcastic ass doesn't make them correct.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>slashdotters spend their whole life shitting on the 'worthless humanities ' , but then can not even correctly state the basic fundamental facts of major themes in history.frederick douglas and many other slaves got payed .
they didnt get payed much but they got payed .
some were even able to buy themselves out of slavery .
not many though .
it did n't save him from being beaten , from watching other slaves get shot lynched and murdered , etc.perhaps you should drop the camel or aardvark book and pick up 'narrative of the life of frederick douglas' .
your ignorance is truly embarassing.the people who voted this + 4 funny should also be ashamed of their ignorance and stupidity .
just because someone is a sarcastic ass does n't make them correct .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>slashdotters spend their whole life shitting on the 'worthless humanities', but then cannot even correctly state the basic fundamental facts of major themes in history.frederick douglas and many other slaves got payed.
they didnt get payed much but they got payed.
some were even able to buy themselves out of slavery.
not many though.
it didn't save him from being beaten, from watching other slaves get shot lynched and murdered, etc.perhaps you should drop the camel or aardvark book and pick up 'narrative of the life of frederick douglas'.
your ignorance is truly embarassing.the people who voted this +4 funny should also be ashamed of their ignorance and stupidity.
just because someone is a sarcastic ass doesn't make them correct.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290194</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259667720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Dude - there are (and were) cults out in the US today that do much, much worse. Past examples? Branch Davidians (Waco), the SunYungMoon group during the 1980's ("Moonies"), and the recent polygamy compound in Colorado City, Arizona. They all stand out as some rather egregious examples, and I don't doubt there are more of 'em out there today.</p><p>They don't have barbed wire and guards per se, but I'm willing to wager that their denizens are brainwashed enough that none of the fencing and such is necessary.</p></div><p>What did the Branch Davidians do that was so much, much worse?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude - there are ( and were ) cults out in the US today that do much , much worse .
Past examples ?
Branch Davidians ( Waco ) , the SunYungMoon group during the 1980 's ( " Moonies " ) , and the recent polygamy compound in Colorado City , Arizona .
They all stand out as some rather egregious examples , and I do n't doubt there are more of 'em out there today.They do n't have barbed wire and guards per se , but I 'm willing to wager that their denizens are brainwashed enough that none of the fencing and such is necessary.What did the Branch Davidians do that was so much , much worse ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude - there are (and were) cults out in the US today that do much, much worse.
Past examples?
Branch Davidians (Waco), the SunYungMoon group during the 1980's ("Moonies"), and the recent polygamy compound in Colorado City, Arizona.
They all stand out as some rather egregious examples, and I don't doubt there are more of 'em out there today.They don't have barbed wire and guards per se, but I'm willing to wager that their denizens are brainwashed enough that none of the fencing and such is necessary.What did the Branch Davidians do that was so much, much worse?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295318</id>
	<title>Re:Gold Base (Gilman Springs, CA)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259579700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I grew up in scn and spent a year in the sea org. If you are in good standing you are relatively free to come and go, but if they have any inkling that you might be contemplating doing a runner, they will keep you under lock and key. I was physically chased and restrained from leaving on one occasion. Growing up, seeing sea org members being kept under 24 hour guard, sometimes for weeks was not unusual enough to cause any alarm for a child who had grown up under that mentality.</p><p>There are ways to leave. It's called routing out. A process that is part forced scn auditing and part physical labour. I've seen some people spend upwards of 6 months routing out. Failing to comply with this process and leaving anyway (which could entail escaping if they are already on to you, or just slipping away if you've been smart enough to keep your disgruntledness to yourself) will result in excommunication with it's attendant effects on your eternity (scientologists are very precious about their eternities which they buy from the church) and more importantly on your closest family members' willingless to stay in contact with you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I grew up in scn and spent a year in the sea org .
If you are in good standing you are relatively free to come and go , but if they have any inkling that you might be contemplating doing a runner , they will keep you under lock and key .
I was physically chased and restrained from leaving on one occasion .
Growing up , seeing sea org members being kept under 24 hour guard , sometimes for weeks was not unusual enough to cause any alarm for a child who had grown up under that mentality.There are ways to leave .
It 's called routing out .
A process that is part forced scn auditing and part physical labour .
I 've seen some people spend upwards of 6 months routing out .
Failing to comply with this process and leaving anyway ( which could entail escaping if they are already on to you , or just slipping away if you 've been smart enough to keep your disgruntledness to yourself ) will result in excommunication with it 's attendant effects on your eternity ( scientologists are very precious about their eternities which they buy from the church ) and more importantly on your closest family members ' willingless to stay in contact with you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I grew up in scn and spent a year in the sea org.
If you are in good standing you are relatively free to come and go, but if they have any inkling that you might be contemplating doing a runner, they will keep you under lock and key.
I was physically chased and restrained from leaving on one occasion.
Growing up, seeing sea org members being kept under 24 hour guard, sometimes for weeks was not unusual enough to cause any alarm for a child who had grown up under that mentality.There are ways to leave.
It's called routing out.
A process that is part forced scn auditing and part physical labour.
I've seen some people spend upwards of 6 months routing out.
Failing to comply with this process and leaving anyway (which could entail escaping if they are already on to you, or just slipping away if you've been smart enough to keep your disgruntledness to yourself) will result in excommunication with it's attendant effects on your eternity (scientologists are very precious about their eternities which they buy from the church) and more importantly on your closest family members' willingless to stay in contact with you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292774</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>Neffirithion</author>
	<datestamp>1259682240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So how are they not a religion? Just substitute "science fiction" with "fantasy" and you have pretty much every religion out there.</p></div><p>regardless of what I personally believe, every other religion, factually, is not a "money making scheme" because of the sole fact that the other religion's attempts to make money all hindge on the "good will" of others to give money. Churches (outside CoS) aren't "pay to play." but rely on donations to stay open. They don't charge you for coming to church sunday morning... if they did, I think about 90\% of the people that go to church wouldn't anymore.

Although the argument could be made about the power grabbing... but calling every religion a money grabbing scheme is not only inaccurate, but down right stupid.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So how are they not a religion ?
Just substitute " science fiction " with " fantasy " and you have pretty much every religion out there.regardless of what I personally believe , every other religion , factually , is not a " money making scheme " because of the sole fact that the other religion 's attempts to make money all hindge on the " good will " of others to give money .
Churches ( outside CoS ) are n't " pay to play .
" but rely on donations to stay open .
They do n't charge you for coming to church sunday morning... if they did , I think about 90 \ % of the people that go to church would n't anymore .
Although the argument could be made about the power grabbing... but calling every religion a money grabbing scheme is not only inaccurate , but down right stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how are they not a religion?
Just substitute "science fiction" with "fantasy" and you have pretty much every religion out there.regardless of what I personally believe, every other religion, factually, is not a "money making scheme" because of the sole fact that the other religion's attempts to make money all hindge on the "good will" of others to give money.
Churches (outside CoS) aren't "pay to play.
" but rely on donations to stay open.
They don't charge you for coming to church sunday morning... if they did, I think about 90\% of the people that go to church wouldn't anymore.
Although the argument could be made about the power grabbing... but calling every religion a money grabbing scheme is not only inaccurate, but down right stupid.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290058</id>
	<title>Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259667000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whether or not it's technically slavery, it's still a violation of the 13th Amendment.</p><p>"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whether or not it 's technically slavery , it 's still a violation of the 13th Amendment .
" Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude , except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted , shall exist within the United States , or any place subject to their jurisdiction .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whether or not it's technically slavery, it's still a violation of the 13th Amendment.
"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290718</id>
	<title>Re:FLSA</title>
	<author>Fulcrum of Evil</author>
	<datestamp>1259670240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>go read the complaint - people who tried to leave without permission were punished, people who left were captured, returned, and punished, no personal freedom, no free communications, brainwashing, etc. This was nothing more than a prison camp.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>If guards were to testify that they were trained to keep people from leaving, rather than to keep people safe from outsiders, we may have evidence of a crime. So far, though, we just have one man's unsubstantiated claims.</p></div><p>This</p><p><div class="quote"><p>(BTW: the word to describe people who lack skepticism is "gullible")</p></div><p>And this stand in stark contrast. Maybe you're just a scientologist plant - who really knows. You can't really prove that you aren't and it's convenient to claim that you are.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>go read the complaint - people who tried to leave without permission were punished , people who left were captured , returned , and punished , no personal freedom , no free communications , brainwashing , etc .
This was nothing more than a prison camp.If guards were to testify that they were trained to keep people from leaving , rather than to keep people safe from outsiders , we may have evidence of a crime .
So far , though , we just have one man 's unsubstantiated claims.This ( BTW : the word to describe people who lack skepticism is " gullible " ) And this stand in stark contrast .
Maybe you 're just a scientologist plant - who really knows .
You ca n't really prove that you are n't and it 's convenient to claim that you are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>go read the complaint - people who tried to leave without permission were punished, people who left were captured, returned, and punished, no personal freedom, no free communications, brainwashing, etc.
This was nothing more than a prison camp.If guards were to testify that they were trained to keep people from leaving, rather than to keep people safe from outsiders, we may have evidence of a crime.
So far, though, we just have one man's unsubstantiated claims.This(BTW: the word to describe people who lack skepticism is "gullible")And this stand in stark contrast.
Maybe you're just a scientologist plant - who really knows.
You can't really prove that you aren't and it's convenient to claim that you are.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289362</id>
	<title>Re:How Is This Nerd News??!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259664300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why does it have to be about something online to be of relevance to nerds?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does it have to be about something online to be of relevance to nerds ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does it have to be about something online to be of relevance to nerds?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289908</id>
	<title>This isn't the first time</title>
	<author>smellsofbikes</author>
	<datestamp>1259666400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It sounds like Lindstein was caught in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rehabilitation\_Project\_Force" title="wikipedia.org">Rehabilitation Project Force</a> [wikipedia.org] program, which is where Scientology dissidents are placed until they get better, where 'better' is defined by the people who put them there.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold\_Base" title="wikipedia.org">Gold Base</a> [wikipedia.org] is by no means the only such place people are kept: the first RPF people were on ships, cleaning out the sewage systems by hand.  Sort of hard to call the police when you're being held on a ship in international waters...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It sounds like Lindstein was caught in the Rehabilitation Project Force [ wikipedia.org ] program , which is where Scientology dissidents are placed until they get better , where 'better ' is defined by the people who put them there .
Gold Base [ wikipedia.org ] is by no means the only such place people are kept : the first RPF people were on ships , cleaning out the sewage systems by hand .
Sort of hard to call the police when you 're being held on a ship in international waters.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It sounds like Lindstein was caught in the Rehabilitation Project Force [wikipedia.org] program, which is where Scientology dissidents are placed until they get better, where 'better' is defined by the people who put them there.
Gold Base [wikipedia.org] is by no means the only such place people are kept: the first RPF people were on ships, cleaning out the sewage systems by hand.
Sort of hard to call the police when you're being held on a ship in international waters...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291854</id>
	<title>Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave"</title>
	<author>StarWreck</author>
	<datestamp>1259675880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>WRONG!

Slavery is involuntary servitude, regardless of whether or not you are paid.</htmltext>
<tokenext>WRONG !
Slavery is involuntary servitude , regardless of whether or not you are paid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WRONG!
Slavery is involuntary servitude, regardless of whether or not you are paid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289336</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30299356</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>Cederic</author>
	<datestamp>1259606100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed. Ironic really<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed .
Ironic really : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed.
Ironic really :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289732</id>
	<title>Tom Cruise &amp; Scientology:</title>
	<author>stakovahflow</author>
	<datestamp>1259665800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/scientolulz" title="albinoblacksheep.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/scientolulz</a> [albinoblacksheep.com] (there's my two cents... I'm out.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/scientolulz [ albinoblacksheep.com ] ( there 's my two cents... I 'm out .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/scientolulz [albinoblacksheep.com] (there's my two cents... I'm out.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291324</id>
	<title>Re:Scientology as a force for good?</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1259673000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The only defense I can think of is that they could be a lot worse (ie. Jonestown, Heaven's Gate), "</p><p>Their body counts run in the millions so their net effect was and is vastly worse!</p><p>Jonestown and Heaven's Gate were good religions because their believers self-terminated before the beliefs metastasized.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The only defense I can think of is that they could be a lot worse ( ie .
Jonestown , Heaven 's Gate ) , " Their body counts run in the millions so their net effect was and is vastly worse ! Jonestown and Heaven 's Gate were good religions because their believers self-terminated before the beliefs metastasized .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The only defense I can think of is that they could be a lot worse (ie.
Jonestown, Heaven's Gate), "Their body counts run in the millions so their net effect was and is vastly worse!Jonestown and Heaven's Gate were good religions because their believers self-terminated before the beliefs metastasized.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30294310</id>
	<title>David Miscavige</title>
	<author>FreakyGreenLeaky</author>
	<datestamp>1259696400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it only me, or does anyone else also read David <i>Miscarriage</i> whenever they see this guy's name?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it only me , or does anyone else also read David Miscarriage whenever they see this guy 's name ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it only me, or does anyone else also read David Miscarriage whenever they see this guy's name?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292248</id>
	<title>Yeah, it is pretty evil.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259678340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; All organized religion should be treated with utter contempt.</p><p>You know, you might want to read about these people who felt exactly the way you do.  Only they acted upon those feelings of hatred and actually did something about the problem.</p><p>Their names were Mao &amp; Stalin.  I believe you can find more information about how their plans turned out online.</p><p>Hatred is the problem.  And *everyone* believes that those they hate are evil.  I believe you can find plenty of examples where groups of people were demonized.  Some of those groups even deserved it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; All organized religion should be treated with utter contempt.You know , you might want to read about these people who felt exactly the way you do .
Only they acted upon those feelings of hatred and actually did something about the problem.Their names were Mao &amp; Stalin .
I believe you can find more information about how their plans turned out online.Hatred is the problem .
And * everyone * believes that those they hate are evil .
I believe you can find plenty of examples where groups of people were demonized .
Some of those groups even deserved it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; All organized religion should be treated with utter contempt.You know, you might want to read about these people who felt exactly the way you do.
Only they acted upon those feelings of hatred and actually did something about the problem.Their names were Mao &amp; Stalin.
I believe you can find more information about how their plans turned out online.Hatred is the problem.
And *everyone* believes that those they hate are evil.
I believe you can find plenty of examples where groups of people were demonized.
Some of those groups even deserved it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290812</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>Xtravar</author>
	<datestamp>1259670660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't start a Scientology debate when Catholicism is in the news, so you shouldn't start a Catholicism debate when Scientology is in the news.  It's completely asinine, and it's what the Scientologists want to 'legitimize' their organization.  Whether you think the Catholic Church is more or less legitimate is irrelevant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't start a Scientology debate when Catholicism is in the news , so you should n't start a Catholicism debate when Scientology is in the news .
It 's completely asinine , and it 's what the Scientologists want to 'legitimize ' their organization .
Whether you think the Catholic Church is more or less legitimate is irrelevant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't start a Scientology debate when Catholicism is in the news, so you shouldn't start a Catholicism debate when Scientology is in the news.
It's completely asinine, and it's what the Scientologists want to 'legitimize' their organization.
Whether you think the Catholic Church is more or less legitimate is irrelevant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293558</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259689560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ho-lee crap. Why has a bigger deal not been made out of this kind of material?!?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ho-lee crap .
Why has a bigger deal not been made out of this kind of material ? ! ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ho-lee crap.
Why has a bigger deal not been made out of this kind of material?!?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293956</id>
	<title>Re:serious question: Isnt this a "Monastary"?</title>
	<author>JumperCable</author>
	<datestamp>1259692620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Monasteries typically don't have:<br>* Sniper nests<br>* Double bladed razor fences<br>* Motion sensors facing inside<br>* Armed security guard preventing people from leaving<br>* A full arsenal of guns<br>* People are allowed to leave<br>* Phone calls &amp; mail are not monitored &amp; prefiltered<br>* Phone calls from concerned relatives are not coached<br>* People inside are not punished when someone leaves<br>* Nunneries don't coerce females to have abortions to keep up productivity<br>* Emergency calls to the police actually go to the police &amp; not internal security<br>* Don't make 'bad' monks clean septic tanks with their hands (no tools, JUST their hands).<br>* Don't throw members into a shit pond for not behaving by their standards.<br>* Get to see their family<br>* Are not physically beat, kicked or strangled by their leader David Miscavige.<br>* Are not asked by their leader David Miscavige to beat/attack other members who are not living up to the leader's standards.<br>* Are permitted time for personal hygiene when being punished for information leaks.<br>* Do not go into lock down when information leaks</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Monasteries typically do n't have : * Sniper nests * Double bladed razor fences * Motion sensors facing inside * Armed security guard preventing people from leaving * A full arsenal of guns * People are allowed to leave * Phone calls &amp; mail are not monitored &amp; prefiltered * Phone calls from concerned relatives are not coached * People inside are not punished when someone leaves * Nunneries do n't coerce females to have abortions to keep up productivity * Emergency calls to the police actually go to the police &amp; not internal security * Do n't make 'bad ' monks clean septic tanks with their hands ( no tools , JUST their hands ) .
* Do n't throw members into a shit pond for not behaving by their standards .
* Get to see their family * Are not physically beat , kicked or strangled by their leader David Miscavige .
* Are not asked by their leader David Miscavige to beat/attack other members who are not living up to the leader 's standards .
* Are permitted time for personal hygiene when being punished for information leaks .
* Do not go into lock down when information leaks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Monasteries typically don't have:* Sniper nests* Double bladed razor fences* Motion sensors facing inside* Armed security guard preventing people from leaving* A full arsenal of guns* People are allowed to leave* Phone calls &amp; mail are not monitored &amp; prefiltered* Phone calls from concerned relatives are not coached* People inside are not punished when someone leaves* Nunneries don't coerce females to have abortions to keep up productivity* Emergency calls to the police actually go to the police &amp; not internal security* Don't make 'bad' monks clean septic tanks with their hands (no tools, JUST their hands).
* Don't throw members into a shit pond for not behaving by their standards.
* Get to see their family* Are not physically beat, kicked or strangled by their leader David Miscavige.
* Are not asked by their leader David Miscavige to beat/attack other members who are not living up to the leader's standards.
* Are permitted time for personal hygiene when being punished for information leaks.
* Do not go into lock down when information leaks</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291714</id>
	<title>Re:Scientology as a force for good?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259675220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.scientology.org/world/index.html" title="scientology.org" rel="nofollow">Solutions For A Troubled Word</a> [scientology.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Solutions For A Troubled Word [ scientology.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Solutions For A Troubled Word [scientology.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289740</id>
	<title>Gold Base (Gilman Springs, CA)</title>
	<author>Ohio Calvinist</author>
	<datestamp>1259665800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I live near this facility (<a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;source=s\_q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=gilman+springs&amp;sll=37.0625,-95.677068&amp;sspn=51.488837,78.837891&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;hq=&amp;hnear=Gilman+Springs+Rd,+Moreno+Valley,+Riverside,+California+92555&amp;ll=33.832565,-116.986156&amp;spn=0.013315,0.019248&amp;t=h&amp;z=16" title="google.com">map/image</a> [google.com]) and it looks more like a gated-resort community than anything. I haven't seen any razor wire, but there are high fences and access is controlled through a gate, and there are cameras on the road and on the fence. For the interested, there is a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold\_Base" title="wikipedia.org">wiki page</a> [wikipedia.org] that strikes me as being pretty accurate and NPOV.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I live near this facility ( map/image [ google.com ] ) and it looks more like a gated-resort community than anything .
I have n't seen any razor wire , but there are high fences and access is controlled through a gate , and there are cameras on the road and on the fence .
For the interested , there is a wiki page [ wikipedia.org ] that strikes me as being pretty accurate and NPOV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live near this facility (map/image [google.com]) and it looks more like a gated-resort community than anything.
I haven't seen any razor wire, but there are high fences and access is controlled through a gate, and there are cameras on the road and on the fence.
For the interested, there is a wiki page [wikipedia.org] that strikes me as being pretty accurate and NPOV.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290232</id>
	<title>CoS "base" in Colorado</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259667840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I once had the opportunity to read part of the diary of a teenage girl who had been at a Scientology "Base" in Colorado.  I don't recall the name of it, or even whether she mentioned it by name (this was 20 years ago).  The disruptive, corruptive effects her involvement with this Base and the CoS had on her state of mind were obvious from what she wrote.  While I don't recall whether she described any physical enslavement, the mental enslavement was apparent.</p><p>Why they're still getting away with it mystifies me; pretty much everyone now knows what they're doing and how they're doing it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I once had the opportunity to read part of the diary of a teenage girl who had been at a Scientology " Base " in Colorado .
I do n't recall the name of it , or even whether she mentioned it by name ( this was 20 years ago ) .
The disruptive , corruptive effects her involvement with this Base and the CoS had on her state of mind were obvious from what she wrote .
While I do n't recall whether she described any physical enslavement , the mental enslavement was apparent.Why they 're still getting away with it mystifies me ; pretty much everyone now knows what they 're doing and how they 're doing it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I once had the opportunity to read part of the diary of a teenage girl who had been at a Scientology "Base" in Colorado.
I don't recall the name of it, or even whether she mentioned it by name (this was 20 years ago).
The disruptive, corruptive effects her involvement with this Base and the CoS had on her state of mind were obvious from what she wrote.
While I don't recall whether she described any physical enslavement, the mental enslavement was apparent.Why they're still getting away with it mystifies me; pretty much everyone now knows what they're doing and how they're doing it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290914</id>
	<title>Re:How Is This Nerd News??!!</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1259671020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Geez, Tom, no need to take it personally.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Geez , Tom , no need to take it personally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geez, Tom, no need to take it personally.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289688</id>
	<title>Re:How Is This Nerd News??!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259665560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is it that everytime $cientology is posted on Slashdot, some dolt posts a derivation of :
<br> <br> Slashdot should stick to its stated goal of news for nerds. This simply isn't it. It has nothing to do with my rights online or anybody's rights online."
<br> <br>

While with an minimum of research, it would be clear that $cientology is well know for DMCA abuses, including ones directed towards the very forum you are posting on?
<br> <br>
Sweet Jesus, you are dumb enough to be a $cientologist!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is it that everytime $ cientology is posted on Slashdot , some dolt posts a derivation of : Slashdot should stick to its stated goal of news for nerds .
This simply is n't it .
It has nothing to do with my rights online or anybody 's rights online .
" While with an minimum of research , it would be clear that $ cientology is well know for DMCA abuses , including ones directed towards the very forum you are posting on ?
Sweet Jesus , you are dumb enough to be a $ cientologist !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is it that everytime $cientology is posted on Slashdot, some dolt posts a derivation of :
  Slashdot should stick to its stated goal of news for nerds.
This simply isn't it.
It has nothing to do with my rights online or anybody's rights online.
"
 

While with an minimum of research, it would be clear that $cientology is well know for DMCA abuses, including ones directed towards the very forum you are posting on?
Sweet Jesus, you are dumb enough to be a $cientologist!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290348</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>Kreigaffe</author>
	<datestamp>1259668440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I personally think you took one step too far when you afforded the CoS the respect of referring to them as an organized religion.  They're not, catholicism is, there's a huge difference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I personally think you took one step too far when you afforded the CoS the respect of referring to them as an organized religion .
They 're not , catholicism is , there 's a huge difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I personally think you took one step too far when you afforded the CoS the respect of referring to them as an organized religion.
They're not, catholicism is, there's a huge difference.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295422</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>stupid\_is</author>
	<datestamp>1259580660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Churches (outside CoS) aren't "pay to play." but rely on donations to stay open. They don't charge you for coming to church sunday morning... if they did, I think about 90\% of the people that go to church wouldn't anymore.</p></div><p>How about the Mormon tithe, then? While not "mandatory" to contribute the full amount, it would seem that there would be a lot of pressure to stump up that 10\%. It even applies to children, too.</p><p>Or then there's Islamic Zakat - a compulsory 2.5\% (although I guess you get to give it direct to a charitable cause, and not to the central church).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Churches ( outside CoS ) are n't " pay to play .
" but rely on donations to stay open .
They do n't charge you for coming to church sunday morning... if they did , I think about 90 \ % of the people that go to church would n't anymore.How about the Mormon tithe , then ?
While not " mandatory " to contribute the full amount , it would seem that there would be a lot of pressure to stump up that 10 \ % .
It even applies to children , too.Or then there 's Islamic Zakat - a compulsory 2.5 \ % ( although I guess you get to give it direct to a charitable cause , and not to the central church ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Churches (outside CoS) aren't "pay to play.
" but rely on donations to stay open.
They don't charge you for coming to church sunday morning... if they did, I think about 90\% of the people that go to church wouldn't anymore.How about the Mormon tithe, then?
While not "mandatory" to contribute the full amount, it would seem that there would be a lot of pressure to stump up that 10\%.
It even applies to children, too.Or then there's Islamic Zakat - a compulsory 2.5\% (although I guess you get to give it direct to a charitable cause, and not to the central church).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259666460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quite right.  GP also referred to the CoS as 'mainstream'.  There is nothing mainstream about them.  Most other countries don't even recognize them as a religion.  They are a money making / power grabbing scheme dreamed up by a second rate megalomaniac science fiction author that has now taken on a life of its own.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quite right .
GP also referred to the CoS as 'mainstream' .
There is nothing mainstream about them .
Most other countries do n't even recognize them as a religion .
They are a money making / power grabbing scheme dreamed up by a second rate megalomaniac science fiction author that has now taken on a life of its own .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quite right.
GP also referred to the CoS as 'mainstream'.
There is nothing mainstream about them.
Most other countries don't even recognize them as a religion.
They are a money making / power grabbing scheme dreamed up by a second rate megalomaniac science fiction author that has now taken on a life of its own.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290084</id>
	<title>You're all over comlicating these things.</title>
	<author>ComputerGeek01</author>
	<datestamp>1259667120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know what forget this 'slavery' crap. He was 8 when he started, it's on page 2 people in black and white.

<a href="http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/MinorsSummaryCharts.pdf" title="ca.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/MinorsSummaryCharts.pdf</a> [ca.gov]

Although I have no idea how the statute of limitations applies for this individual I would guess that they are doing the same crap to other kids.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know what forget this 'slavery ' crap .
He was 8 when he started , it 's on page 2 people in black and white .
http : //www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/MinorsSummaryCharts.pdf [ ca.gov ] Although I have no idea how the statute of limitations applies for this individual I would guess that they are doing the same crap to other kids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know what forget this 'slavery' crap.
He was 8 when he started, it's on page 2 people in black and white.
http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/MinorsSummaryCharts.pdf [ca.gov]

Although I have no idea how the statute of limitations applies for this individual I would guess that they are doing the same crap to other kids.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289704</id>
	<title>Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave"</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1259665680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>You don't count being held in a compound surrounded by razor wire and forced to work 16-24 hours a day at age 8 as "involuntary servitude"? Wow, you must have had a much rougher childhood than me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't count being held in a compound surrounded by razor wire and forced to work 16-24 hours a day at age 8 as " involuntary servitude " ?
Wow , you must have had a much rougher childhood than me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't count being held in a compound surrounded by razor wire and forced to work 16-24 hours a day at age 8 as "involuntary servitude"?
Wow, you must have had a much rougher childhood than me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289336</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290482</id>
	<title>Re:Ah My Homeland</title>
	<author>phantomcircuit</author>
	<datestamp>1259669100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm guessing zero.</p><p>I'm currently in San Francisco and I can tell you that people in cali have a strong affinity for finding crazy ass conspiracies everywhere except where a conspiracy actually exists.</p><p>Honestly the stupidity of the average person here is astonishing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm guessing zero.I 'm currently in San Francisco and I can tell you that people in cali have a strong affinity for finding crazy ass conspiracies everywhere except where a conspiracy actually exists.Honestly the stupidity of the average person here is astonishing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm guessing zero.I'm currently in San Francisco and I can tell you that people in cali have a strong affinity for finding crazy ass conspiracies everywhere except where a conspiracy actually exists.Honestly the stupidity of the average person here is astonishing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290118</id>
	<title>Re:How Is This Nerd News??!!</title>
	<author>nstlgc</author>
	<datestamp>1259667360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology\_versus\_the\_Internet" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology\_versus\_the\_Internet</a> [wikipedia.org] answers your question.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology \ _versus \ _the \ _Internet [ wikipedia.org ] answers your question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology\_versus\_the\_Internet [wikipedia.org] answers your question.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289868</id>
	<title>Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave"</title>
	<author>aekafan</author>
	<datestamp>1259666280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is exactly right.  It is why I consider a Military or Civil draft slavery.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is exactly right .
It is why I consider a Military or Civil draft slavery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is exactly right.
It is why I consider a Military or Civil draft slavery.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289336</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289330</id>
	<title>In Later News...</title>
	<author>PirateBlis</author>
	<datestamp>1259664180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Authorities released a second statement saying "We're sorry for all the trouble we might have caused Tom Cruise. This was all a simple misunderstanding of the terms "Slave" and "Cult".<nobr> <wbr></nobr>......All your base are belong to us."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Authorities released a second statement saying " We 're sorry for all the trouble we might have caused Tom Cruise .
This was all a simple misunderstanding of the terms " Slave " and " Cult " .
......All your base are belong to us .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Authorities released a second statement saying "We're sorry for all the trouble we might have caused Tom Cruise.
This was all a simple misunderstanding of the terms "Slave" and "Cult".
......All your base are belong to us.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30348240</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>LihTox</author>
	<datestamp>1260110940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The light passes through all the slits UNLESS the wavefunction collapses, in which case the light goes through one specific slit.  More generally, a particle's wavefunction is a superposition which describes all possible positions in the Universe, and so if the wavefunction is collapsed, there is a small but ridiculously low probability that it will appear on Mars.</p><p>Mind you, as an explanation for virgin birth, I do find quantum mechanics unsatisfying.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)  The probabilities are much too low for really strange things to occur.  However, quantum mechanics describes a universe in which there is so much we do not know and CANNOT know: the state of a single photon, for instance, is described by a continuous variable, but only one bit of that variable is accessible.  That leaves plenty of room in which a Master Programmer can tweak with the Universe without our knowing about it.  (And yes, I know about Bell's theorem on hidden variables, but I'm not trying to construct a formal theory of the physics of miracles here, just proposing a philosophical argument.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The light passes through all the slits UNLESS the wavefunction collapses , in which case the light goes through one specific slit .
More generally , a particle 's wavefunction is a superposition which describes all possible positions in the Universe , and so if the wavefunction is collapsed , there is a small but ridiculously low probability that it will appear on Mars.Mind you , as an explanation for virgin birth , I do find quantum mechanics unsatisfying .
: ) The probabilities are much too low for really strange things to occur .
However , quantum mechanics describes a universe in which there is so much we do not know and CAN NOT know : the state of a single photon , for instance , is described by a continuous variable , but only one bit of that variable is accessible .
That leaves plenty of room in which a Master Programmer can tweak with the Universe without our knowing about it .
( And yes , I know about Bell 's theorem on hidden variables , but I 'm not trying to construct a formal theory of the physics of miracles here , just proposing a philosophical argument .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The light passes through all the slits UNLESS the wavefunction collapses, in which case the light goes through one specific slit.
More generally, a particle's wavefunction is a superposition which describes all possible positions in the Universe, and so if the wavefunction is collapsed, there is a small but ridiculously low probability that it will appear on Mars.Mind you, as an explanation for virgin birth, I do find quantum mechanics unsatisfying.
:)  The probabilities are much too low for really strange things to occur.
However, quantum mechanics describes a universe in which there is so much we do not know and CANNOT know: the state of a single photon, for instance, is described by a continuous variable, but only one bit of that variable is accessible.
That leaves plenty of room in which a Master Programmer can tweak with the Universe without our knowing about it.
(And yes, I know about Bell's theorem on hidden variables, but I'm not trying to construct a formal theory of the physics of miracles here, just proposing a philosophical argument.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298274</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289252</id>
	<title>Tom Cruise</title>
	<author>dakkon1024</author>
	<datestamp>1259663820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really?I thought Tom Cruise would make more... I guess you really can't put a price on crazy though</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ? I thought Tom Cruise would make more... I guess you really ca n't put a price on crazy though</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?I thought Tom Cruise would make more... I guess you really can't put a price on crazy though</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292036</id>
	<title>Re:How Is This Nerd News??!!</title>
	<author>Scrameustache</author>
	<datestamp>1259677080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why is it that everytime $cientology is posted on Slashdot, some dolt posts a derivation of :</p><p>
&nbsp; Slashdot should stick to its stated goal of news for nerds. This simply isn't it.</p></div><p>Because someone says that in EVERY thread?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is it that everytime $ cientology is posted on Slashdot , some dolt posts a derivation of :   Slashdot should stick to its stated goal of news for nerds .
This simply is n't it.Because someone says that in EVERY thread ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is it that everytime $cientology is posted on Slashdot, some dolt posts a derivation of :
  Slashdot should stick to its stated goal of news for nerds.
This simply isn't it.Because someone says that in EVERY thread?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289378</id>
	<title>Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave"</title>
	<author>jjohnson</author>
	<datestamp>1259664360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The negro workers in the deep South, picking cotton on plantations before the civil war, were given food and a roof over their heads.  By common labor law, that counts as compensation.  Does that mean they weren't slaves?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The negro workers in the deep South , picking cotton on plantations before the civil war , were given food and a roof over their heads .
By common labor law , that counts as compensation .
Does that mean they were n't slaves ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The negro workers in the deep South, picking cotton on plantations before the civil war, were given food and a roof over their heads.
By common labor law, that counts as compensation.
Does that mean they weren't slaves?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289272</id>
	<title>Re:I love it!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259663880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry, that won't happen. The Co$'s lawyers will ensure that they get off. Not only that, but they've infiltrated the government and justice system to the point where I'm surprised they don't have laws exempting them from these types of charges.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , that wo n't happen .
The Co $ 's lawyers will ensure that they get off .
Not only that , but they 've infiltrated the government and justice system to the point where I 'm surprised they do n't have laws exempting them from these types of charges .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, that won't happen.
The Co$'s lawyers will ensure that they get off.
Not only that, but they've infiltrated the government and justice system to the point where I'm surprised they don't have laws exempting them from these types of charges.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292444</id>
	<title>serious question:  Isnt this a "Monastary"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259679660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not sure how Monasteries are treated in the USA.</p><p>Here in Europe, we have all over the place institutions where young adults can "check themselves in" and from then on perform a life in the service of god.<br>In addition, they upkeep the building, work in agriculture and free services (teaching etc.).</p><p>in return they receive no monetary compensation, only the promise to be compensated in a promised "after-life".</p><p>seriously.... wouldnt that also violate USA Wage and Hour regulations?<br>are there no Monastaries in the USA?</p><p>How is this one different??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not sure how Monasteries are treated in the USA.Here in Europe , we have all over the place institutions where young adults can " check themselves in " and from then on perform a life in the service of god.In addition , they upkeep the building , work in agriculture and free services ( teaching etc .
) .in return they receive no monetary compensation , only the promise to be compensated in a promised " after-life " .seriously.... wouldnt that also violate USA Wage and Hour regulations ? are there no Monastaries in the USA ? How is this one different ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not sure how Monasteries are treated in the USA.Here in Europe, we have all over the place institutions where young adults can "check themselves in" and from then on perform a life in the service of god.In addition, they upkeep the building, work in agriculture and free services (teaching etc.
).in return they receive no monetary compensation, only the promise to be compensated in a promised "after-life".seriously.... wouldnt that also violate USA Wage and Hour regulations?are there no Monastaries in the USA?How is this one different?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290214</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>Garridan</author>
	<datestamp>1259667780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're a fan of disorganized religion, eh?  How's that work?  You get lost on your way to church, and when you get there, the priest has NO idea where he saw God last, much less where he is now?  The name of the GOd or goDs change all the time, as does their message(s)?  The priest keeps forgetting to put pants on, but that's ok because the pulpit will cover up the naughty bits if he can ever find it...</p><p>Hmm... yes, this does sound more entertaining than an organized religion.  Where can I sign up?  Oh, you lost the form?  Well... call back if you find it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're a fan of disorganized religion , eh ?
How 's that work ?
You get lost on your way to church , and when you get there , the priest has NO idea where he saw God last , much less where he is now ?
The name of the GOd or goDs change all the time , as does their message ( s ) ?
The priest keeps forgetting to put pants on , but that 's ok because the pulpit will cover up the naughty bits if he can ever find it...Hmm... yes , this does sound more entertaining than an organized religion .
Where can I sign up ?
Oh , you lost the form ?
Well... call back if you find it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're a fan of disorganized religion, eh?
How's that work?
You get lost on your way to church, and when you get there, the priest has NO idea where he saw God last, much less where he is now?
The name of the GOd or goDs change all the time, as does their message(s)?
The priest keeps forgetting to put pants on, but that's ok because the pulpit will cover up the naughty bits if he can ever find it...Hmm... yes, this does sound more entertaining than an organized religion.
Where can I sign up?
Oh, you lost the form?
Well... call back if you find it...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286</id>
	<title>How Is This Nerd News??!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259663940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe slashdot should stick to its stated goal of news for nerds.</p><p>This simply isn't it.  It has nothing to do with my rights online or anybody's rights online.</p><p>Please stop this Scientology bashing.  We know its a kooky scam, but it sure as hell doesn't belong on this site.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe slashdot should stick to its stated goal of news for nerds.This simply is n't it .
It has nothing to do with my rights online or anybody 's rights online.Please stop this Scientology bashing .
We know its a kooky scam , but it sure as hell does n't belong on this site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe slashdot should stick to its stated goal of news for nerds.This simply isn't it.
It has nothing to do with my rights online or anybody's rights online.Please stop this Scientology bashing.
We know its a kooky scam, but it sure as hell doesn't belong on this site.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289806</id>
	<title>No difference than the Christian cult</title>
	<author>mlawrence</author>
	<datestamp>1259666100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>My parents forced me to go to church every week, then sunday school, and during the week I would be forced to work as an altar boy for no pay.   All the time I was brainwashed with repetitive prayers and actions.

A cult is a cult is a cult.  It doesn't matter that here in North America we tend to be fond of a particular one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My parents forced me to go to church every week , then sunday school , and during the week I would be forced to work as an altar boy for no pay .
All the time I was brainwashed with repetitive prayers and actions .
A cult is a cult is a cult .
It does n't matter that here in North America we tend to be fond of a particular one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My parents forced me to go to church every week, then sunday school, and during the week I would be forced to work as an altar boy for no pay.
All the time I was brainwashed with repetitive prayers and actions.
A cult is a cult is a cult.
It doesn't matter that here in North America we tend to be fond of a particular one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30296678</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>RivenAleem</author>
	<datestamp>1259593140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And the Catholic church hasn't recently taken anyone (Dan Brown) to court over saying bad things about them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the Catholic church has n't recently taken anyone ( Dan Brown ) to court over saying bad things about them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the Catholic church hasn't recently taken anyone (Dan Brown) to court over saying bad things about them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289564</id>
	<title>Geezz.. when will these attacks on</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259665020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>faith-based construction end!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>faith-based construction end !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>faith-based construction end!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292692</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>MBGMorden</author>
	<datestamp>1259681460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The thing is 70\% of the US population subscribes to the same (general) organized religion.  You're going to have a hell of a time getting them to treat their own religion with contempt. Frankly I'm amazed that the first amendment is stood up as long as it has.  Lets hope we get at least another few hundred years out of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing is 70 \ % of the US population subscribes to the same ( general ) organized religion .
You 're going to have a hell of a time getting them to treat their own religion with contempt .
Frankly I 'm amazed that the first amendment is stood up as long as it has .
Lets hope we get at least another few hundred years out of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing is 70\% of the US population subscribes to the same (general) organized religion.
You're going to have a hell of a time getting them to treat their own religion with contempt.
Frankly I'm amazed that the first amendment is stood up as long as it has.
Lets hope we get at least another few hundred years out of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289756</id>
	<title>I haven't read the article... BUT...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259665860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Christianity is superior to all other religions!</p><p>Evolution is an abnormal science!</p><p>Sieg heil, Jesus!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Christianity is superior to all other religions ! Evolution is an abnormal science ! Sieg heil , Jesus !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Christianity is superior to all other religions!Evolution is an abnormal science!Sieg heil, Jesus!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292210</id>
	<title>oh my!</title>
	<author>WeeBit</author>
	<datestamp>1259678100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are getting desperate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are getting desperate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are getting desperate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289416</id>
	<title>Re:Scientology as a force for good?</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1259664480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It hasn't been around as long as some of the other religions, so its follower base is smaller, which somewhat limits the damage they can do?</p><p>The incredible amount of obvious attempts at secrecy and loud legal threats keeps them in the spotlight, keeping all but the most gullible and weak-willed from being stupid enough to join up?</p><p>Sorry, that's all I've got.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It has n't been around as long as some of the other religions , so its follower base is smaller , which somewhat limits the damage they can do ? The incredible amount of obvious attempts at secrecy and loud legal threats keeps them in the spotlight , keeping all but the most gullible and weak-willed from being stupid enough to join up ? Sorry , that 's all I 've got .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It hasn't been around as long as some of the other religions, so its follower base is smaller, which somewhat limits the damage they can do?The incredible amount of obvious attempts at secrecy and loud legal threats keeps them in the spotlight, keeping all but the most gullible and weak-willed from being stupid enough to join up?Sorry, that's all I've got.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298274</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>KnownIssues</author>
	<datestamp>1259601360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>quantum mechanics ALLOWS for the virgin birth, since everything is possible (if highly improbable) in quantum mechanics).</p></div><p>
I just have to nitpick about this. Quantum mechanics doesn't say everything is possible. It says--by one interpretation--that everything that can happen does happen. The key words are probable and possible. Every possible alternative, no matter how improbable, exists. But that doesn't mean that everything is possible.
</p><p>
In the classic experiment with a lead sheet with slits in it and shining a light through it, the light passes through all the slits, not just one or the other. The light does <i>not</i> pass through the lead or show up on Mars or turn into water.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>quantum mechanics ALLOWS for the virgin birth , since everything is possible ( if highly improbable ) in quantum mechanics ) .
I just have to nitpick about this .
Quantum mechanics does n't say everything is possible .
It says--by one interpretation--that everything that can happen does happen .
The key words are probable and possible .
Every possible alternative , no matter how improbable , exists .
But that does n't mean that everything is possible .
In the classic experiment with a lead sheet with slits in it and shining a light through it , the light passes through all the slits , not just one or the other .
The light does not pass through the lead or show up on Mars or turn into water .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>quantum mechanics ALLOWS for the virgin birth, since everything is possible (if highly improbable) in quantum mechanics).
I just have to nitpick about this.
Quantum mechanics doesn't say everything is possible.
It says--by one interpretation--that everything that can happen does happen.
The key words are probable and possible.
Every possible alternative, no matter how improbable, exists.
But that doesn't mean that everything is possible.
In the classic experiment with a lead sheet with slits in it and shining a light through it, the light passes through all the slits, not just one or the other.
The light does not pass through the lead or show up on Mars or turn into water.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290054</id>
	<title>Congratulations Scientology...</title>
	<author>Null Perception</author>
	<datestamp>1259667000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...you are now officially a religion.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...you are now officially a religion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...you are now officially a religion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291520</id>
	<title>Re:Gold Base (Gilman Springs, CA)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259674080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>and it looks more like a gated-resort community than anything. I haven't seen any razor wire, but there are high fences and access is controlled through a gate, and there are cameras on the road and on the fence.</p></div><p>It depends where you look. <a href="http://www.angrygaypope.com/gold/gold\_security\_gallery/" title="angrygaypope.com" rel="nofollow">Here</a> [angrygaypope.com] is a collection of photos of various parts of the Gold Base security. From what I've been able to make out, it sounds like the blade fences (not razor wire) are concentrated in the north-east part of the base, around where their detention facilities are thought to be.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and it looks more like a gated-resort community than anything .
I have n't seen any razor wire , but there are high fences and access is controlled through a gate , and there are cameras on the road and on the fence.It depends where you look .
Here [ angrygaypope.com ] is a collection of photos of various parts of the Gold Base security .
From what I 've been able to make out , it sounds like the blade fences ( not razor wire ) are concentrated in the north-east part of the base , around where their detention facilities are thought to be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and it looks more like a gated-resort community than anything.
I haven't seen any razor wire, but there are high fences and access is controlled through a gate, and there are cameras on the road and on the fence.It depends where you look.
Here [angrygaypope.com] is a collection of photos of various parts of the Gold Base security.
From what I've been able to make out, it sounds like the blade fences (not razor wire) are concentrated in the north-east part of the base, around where their detention facilities are thought to be.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289392</id>
	<title>Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave"</title>
	<author>confused one</author>
	<datestamp>1259664420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Forced labor.  There, is that better?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Forced labor .
There , is that better ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forced labor.
There, is that better?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298620</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1259603040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I also don't think that leaders of major religions truly believe the shit they espouse. Fucking con artists the lot of them.</p></div><p>Christ himself said basically the same thing of the Pharisees, etc, during his time.  In fact he got angry enough to open a can of <a href="http://www.getty.edu/art/gettyguide/artObjectDetails?artobj=575" title="getty.edu">whoop ass</a> [getty.edu] on at least one occasion.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I also do n't think that leaders of major religions truly believe the shit they espouse .
Fucking con artists the lot of them.Christ himself said basically the same thing of the Pharisees , etc , during his time .
In fact he got angry enough to open a can of whoop ass [ getty.edu ] on at least one occasion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I also don't think that leaders of major religions truly believe the shit they espouse.
Fucking con artists the lot of them.Christ himself said basically the same thing of the Pharisees, etc, during his time.
In fact he got angry enough to open a can of whoop ass [getty.edu] on at least one occasion.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291874</id>
	<title>How to form your own cult</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259676000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.cracked.com/blog/how-to-form-your-own-cult-in-5-steps/</p><p>nuf said</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.cracked.com/blog/how-to-form-your-own-cult-in-5-steps/nuf said</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.cracked.com/blog/how-to-form-your-own-cult-in-5-steps/nuf said</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289336</id>
	<title>Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259664180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slavery actually connotes a position of involuntary servitude rather than one where payment is withheld.  That is, it is the lack of freedom that is the main attribute of slavery, not the lack of compensation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slavery actually connotes a position of involuntary servitude rather than one where payment is withheld .
That is , it is the lack of freedom that is the main attribute of slavery , not the lack of compensation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slavery actually connotes a position of involuntary servitude rather than one where payment is withheld.
That is, it is the lack of freedom that is the main attribute of slavery, not the lack of compensation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289526</id>
	<title>Ah My Homeland</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1259664840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>As a Californian I wonder how much interest this is going to garner in my home state regarding the abuses of Scientology. On the one hand, my state is populated with pipe dreamers, smoked out idealists, flower children, hippy nutjobs, and all sorts of other forms of extreme liberalism. On the other hand, we have very rich communities like Hollywood, the OC, and Roseville. We also, apparently, have enough orthodox, classic right wingers that we voted down legalizing gay marriage recently. We have farmers. We have students. We have programmers. We have ranchers. We have movie stars. We have one of the most diverse culture mixtures in the world I bet. That's part of why I love it here...
<br> <br>
Of course, along with that diversity is an unfathomable tolerance for some particularly poignant cases of stupidity...like our state budget. There is no doubt that the strong and vocal religious groups here in California would raise exception and a helluva kerfuffle over their church being towed to court for slavery. But I wonder if any of those groups see a case regarding Scientology as a threat. After all sometimes the most belligerent opposition to one religion comes from another religion. I have seen folks in Fawkes masks walking around my local famer's market protesting Scientology. However, I have also had Scientologists try to recruit me both in my home town and when I wander the rest of the state. So this will certainly be an interesting case to watch. I hope it garners some attention and noise in this state and, perhaps, even in our country. Exposing Scientology for the cult and crime syndicate it is certainly is, in my opinion, a righteous cause....
<br> <br>
Well if there's one thing we Californians know how to do, its garner attention and make some noise. I'm gonna go pop some popcorn...</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a Californian I wonder how much interest this is going to garner in my home state regarding the abuses of Scientology .
On the one hand , my state is populated with pipe dreamers , smoked out idealists , flower children , hippy nutjobs , and all sorts of other forms of extreme liberalism .
On the other hand , we have very rich communities like Hollywood , the OC , and Roseville .
We also , apparently , have enough orthodox , classic right wingers that we voted down legalizing gay marriage recently .
We have farmers .
We have students .
We have programmers .
We have ranchers .
We have movie stars .
We have one of the most diverse culture mixtures in the world I bet .
That 's part of why I love it here.. . Of course , along with that diversity is an unfathomable tolerance for some particularly poignant cases of stupidity...like our state budget .
There is no doubt that the strong and vocal religious groups here in California would raise exception and a helluva kerfuffle over their church being towed to court for slavery .
But I wonder if any of those groups see a case regarding Scientology as a threat .
After all sometimes the most belligerent opposition to one religion comes from another religion .
I have seen folks in Fawkes masks walking around my local famer 's market protesting Scientology .
However , I have also had Scientologists try to recruit me both in my home town and when I wander the rest of the state .
So this will certainly be an interesting case to watch .
I hope it garners some attention and noise in this state and , perhaps , even in our country .
Exposing Scientology for the cult and crime syndicate it is certainly is , in my opinion , a righteous cause... . Well if there 's one thing we Californians know how to do , its garner attention and make some noise .
I 'm gon na go pop some popcorn.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a Californian I wonder how much interest this is going to garner in my home state regarding the abuses of Scientology.
On the one hand, my state is populated with pipe dreamers, smoked out idealists, flower children, hippy nutjobs, and all sorts of other forms of extreme liberalism.
On the other hand, we have very rich communities like Hollywood, the OC, and Roseville.
We also, apparently, have enough orthodox, classic right wingers that we voted down legalizing gay marriage recently.
We have farmers.
We have students.
We have programmers.
We have ranchers.
We have movie stars.
We have one of the most diverse culture mixtures in the world I bet.
That's part of why I love it here...
 
Of course, along with that diversity is an unfathomable tolerance for some particularly poignant cases of stupidity...like our state budget.
There is no doubt that the strong and vocal religious groups here in California would raise exception and a helluva kerfuffle over their church being towed to court for slavery.
But I wonder if any of those groups see a case regarding Scientology as a threat.
After all sometimes the most belligerent opposition to one religion comes from another religion.
I have seen folks in Fawkes masks walking around my local famer's market protesting Scientology.
However, I have also had Scientologists try to recruit me both in my home town and when I wander the rest of the state.
So this will certainly be an interesting case to watch.
I hope it garners some attention and noise in this state and, perhaps, even in our country.
Exposing Scientology for the cult and crime syndicate it is certainly is, in my opinion, a righteous cause....
 
Well if there's one thing we Californians know how to do, its garner attention and make some noise.
I'm gonna go pop some popcorn...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30338454</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260009120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree with almost everything that you wrote,... that surprise/bothers me,... I enjoy arguing with others,... it's almost a reflex.  It seems that most of your responders didn't "read" you as I imagine "operaghost" may have, and i did.  I didn't read you as degrading of either "camps," except if they imagined they had exclusive access to "The Truth," which, somehow allowed them to behave differently from others.  I didn't read your msg as flame bait, either, but on rereading it I can see how it might be taken as that.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; with the hope that what's below brings more good than harm,...</p><p>The left eye does not see exactly what the right eye sees,... especially noticeable with "intermediary objects" present.  How does "one" manage the conflict?  Some folks generate something called perspective.  Others favor one eye over another, to varying degrees,... sometimes to ignoring the "info" of one eye completely.  Seeing through a single eye allows better focus but much less perspective.</p><p>When there is good light and lack of obstruction, given the choice between having eyes or ears, I would choose eyes.  When there is insufficient light, hearing seems of greater use.</p><p>On the occasion I become completely fearless, should it ever arrive, I hope to allow the world to *touch* me,... and, then, the game is over.</p><p>That peek-a-boo and hide-and-seek are games of infants and toddlers may offer a suggestion of more than I can hint.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>if there is some part of us that is immortal,... then it is immortal regardless of what we wish or imagine,... if we were to be able to identify "it" and the "it" of others, would we see each other much differently than drivers in automobiles?<br>-=-=-<br>where do ideas come from?<br>-=-=-<br>why does one believe what one believes?<br>-=-=-</p><p>gerry<br>a labeled, and self-acknowledged, coward</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree with almost everything that you wrote,... that surprise/bothers me,... I enjoy arguing with others,... it 's almost a reflex .
It seems that most of your responders did n't " read " you as I imagine " operaghost " may have , and i did .
I did n't read you as degrading of either " camps , " except if they imagined they had exclusive access to " The Truth , " which , somehow allowed them to behave differently from others .
I did n't read your msg as flame bait , either , but on rereading it I can see how it might be taken as that .
    with the hope that what 's below brings more good than harm,...The left eye does not see exactly what the right eye sees,... especially noticeable with " intermediary objects " present .
How does " one " manage the conflict ?
Some folks generate something called perspective .
Others favor one eye over another , to varying degrees,... sometimes to ignoring the " info " of one eye completely .
Seeing through a single eye allows better focus but much less perspective.When there is good light and lack of obstruction , given the choice between having eyes or ears , I would choose eyes .
When there is insufficient light , hearing seems of greater use.On the occasion I become completely fearless , should it ever arrive , I hope to allow the world to * touch * me,... and , then , the game is over.That peek-a-boo and hide-and-seek are games of infants and toddlers may offer a suggestion of more than I can hint .
...if there is some part of us that is immortal,... then it is immortal regardless of what we wish or imagine,... if we were to be able to identify " it " and the " it " of others , would we see each other much differently than drivers in automobiles ? - = - = -where do ideas come from ? - = - = -why does one believe what one believes ? - = - = -gerrya labeled , and self-acknowledged , coward</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree with almost everything that you wrote,... that surprise/bothers me,... I enjoy arguing with others,... it's almost a reflex.
It seems that most of your responders didn't "read" you as I imagine "operaghost" may have, and i did.
I didn't read you as degrading of either "camps," except if they imagined they had exclusive access to "The Truth," which, somehow allowed them to behave differently from others.
I didn't read your msg as flame bait, either, but on rereading it I can see how it might be taken as that.
    with the hope that what's below brings more good than harm,...The left eye does not see exactly what the right eye sees,... especially noticeable with "intermediary objects" present.
How does "one" manage the conflict?
Some folks generate something called perspective.
Others favor one eye over another, to varying degrees,... sometimes to ignoring the "info" of one eye completely.
Seeing through a single eye allows better focus but much less perspective.When there is good light and lack of obstruction, given the choice between having eyes or ears, I would choose eyes.
When there is insufficient light, hearing seems of greater use.On the occasion I become completely fearless, should it ever arrive, I hope to allow the world to *touch* me,... and, then, the game is over.That peek-a-boo and hide-and-seek are games of infants and toddlers may offer a suggestion of more than I can hint.
...if there is some part of us that is immortal,... then it is immortal regardless of what we wish or imagine,... if we were to be able to identify "it" and the "it" of others, would we see each other much differently than drivers in automobiles?-=-=-where do ideas come from?-=-=-why does one believe what one believes?-=-=-gerrya labeled, and self-acknowledged, coward</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291792</id>
	<title>mcdonalds has better benefits</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259675580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>mcdonalds has better benefits and better pay, come to lord ronald</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>mcdonalds has better benefits and better pay , come to lord ronald</tokentext>
<sentencetext>mcdonalds has better benefits and better pay, come to lord ronald</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30294110</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>seebs</author>
	<datestamp>1259694180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The big difference is that we have the founder on record, in writing, claiming that:</p><p>1.  He came up with this stuff under the influence of drugs.<br>2.  That this is not a religion, in any way, shape, or form.<br>3.  Later, that there is now a "religion angle" which exists only for tax and legal reasons, but that there is no change at all of the underlying facts.</p><p>They have written documents saying that they are not a religion, are not intended to be a religion, and are purely scientific.  That does go a long way towards suggesting that they are perhaps not a religion.  Generally, if you put in writing that you are filing forms saying you're a religion only for tax reasons, and not because you actually think you're a religion, that's a big sign.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The big difference is that we have the founder on record , in writing , claiming that : 1 .
He came up with this stuff under the influence of drugs.2 .
That this is not a religion , in any way , shape , or form.3 .
Later , that there is now a " religion angle " which exists only for tax and legal reasons , but that there is no change at all of the underlying facts.They have written documents saying that they are not a religion , are not intended to be a religion , and are purely scientific .
That does go a long way towards suggesting that they are perhaps not a religion .
Generally , if you put in writing that you are filing forms saying you 're a religion only for tax reasons , and not because you actually think you 're a religion , that 's a big sign .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The big difference is that we have the founder on record, in writing, claiming that:1.
He came up with this stuff under the influence of drugs.2.
That this is not a religion, in any way, shape, or form.3.
Later, that there is now a "religion angle" which exists only for tax and legal reasons, but that there is no change at all of the underlying facts.They have written documents saying that they are not a religion, are not intended to be a religion, and are purely scientific.
That does go a long way towards suggesting that they are perhaps not a religion.
Generally, if you put in writing that you are filing forms saying you're a religion only for tax reasons, and not because you actually think you're a religion, that's a big sign.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295066</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>Jedi Alec</author>
	<datestamp>1259576340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>You're a fan of disorganized religion, eh? How's that work? You get lost on your way to church, and when you get there, the priest has NO idea where he saw God last, much less where he is now? The name of the GOd or goDs change all the time, as does their message(s)? The priest keeps forgetting to put pants on, but that's ok because the pulpit will cover up the naughty bits if he can ever find it...</i></p><p><i>Hmm... yes, this does sound more entertaining than an organized religion. Where can I sign up? Oh, you lost the form? Well... call back if you find it...</i></p><p>The roots of protestantism lie in disorganized religion. They rejected the concept of needing an organization with priests and a lot of crap standing between them and their god, and took the right to read and interpret the bible back into their own homes.</p><p>How hard is it to make up one's own mind on what one believes, and then act based on those beliefs? There you go, disorganized religion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're a fan of disorganized religion , eh ?
How 's that work ?
You get lost on your way to church , and when you get there , the priest has NO idea where he saw God last , much less where he is now ?
The name of the GOd or goDs change all the time , as does their message ( s ) ?
The priest keeps forgetting to put pants on , but that 's ok because the pulpit will cover up the naughty bits if he can ever find it...Hmm... yes , this does sound more entertaining than an organized religion .
Where can I sign up ?
Oh , you lost the form ?
Well... call back if you find it...The roots of protestantism lie in disorganized religion .
They rejected the concept of needing an organization with priests and a lot of crap standing between them and their god , and took the right to read and interpret the bible back into their own homes.How hard is it to make up one 's own mind on what one believes , and then act based on those beliefs ?
There you go , disorganized religion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're a fan of disorganized religion, eh?
How's that work?
You get lost on your way to church, and when you get there, the priest has NO idea where he saw God last, much less where he is now?
The name of the GOd or goDs change all the time, as does their message(s)?
The priest keeps forgetting to put pants on, but that's ok because the pulpit will cover up the naughty bits if he can ever find it...Hmm... yes, this does sound more entertaining than an organized religion.
Where can I sign up?
Oh, you lost the form?
Well... call back if you find it...The roots of protestantism lie in disorganized religion.
They rejected the concept of needing an organization with priests and a lot of crap standing between them and their god, and took the right to read and interpret the bible back into their own homes.How hard is it to make up one's own mind on what one believes, and then act based on those beliefs?
There you go, disorganized religion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259665500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude - there are (and were) cults out in the US today that do much, much worse. Past examples? Branch Davidians (Waco), the SunYungMoon group during the 1980's ("Moonies"), and the recent polygamy compound in Colorado City, Arizona. They all stand out as some rather egregious examples, and I don't doubt there are more of 'em out there today.</p><p>They don't have barbed wire and guards per se, but I'm willing to wager that their denizens are brainwashed enough that none of the fencing and such is necessary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude - there are ( and were ) cults out in the US today that do much , much worse .
Past examples ?
Branch Davidians ( Waco ) , the SunYungMoon group during the 1980 's ( " Moonies " ) , and the recent polygamy compound in Colorado City , Arizona .
They all stand out as some rather egregious examples , and I do n't doubt there are more of 'em out there today.They do n't have barbed wire and guards per se , but I 'm willing to wager that their denizens are brainwashed enough that none of the fencing and such is necessary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude - there are (and were) cults out in the US today that do much, much worse.
Past examples?
Branch Davidians (Waco), the SunYungMoon group during the 1980's ("Moonies"), and the recent polygamy compound in Colorado City, Arizona.
They all stand out as some rather egregious examples, and I don't doubt there are more of 'em out there today.They don't have barbed wire and guards per se, but I'm willing to wager that their denizens are brainwashed enough that none of the fencing and such is necessary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293540</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>dissy</author>
	<datestamp>1259689380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>However, even the most jaded, cynical atheist cannot deny that organized religions have also done some amazing things for the societies in which they existed.</p></div><p>I don't think anyone has denied they have done some amazing things.<br>If they have, they are simply wrong.</p><p>Those facts however do not at all change the fact that they enslaved an 8 year old child.</p><p>By that thinking, I too can enslave an 8 year old child legally, because prior to that I have done some pretty nice and amazing things.</p><p>How many old ladies do I need to help across the street before murder is OK?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>However , even the most jaded , cynical atheist can not deny that organized religions have also done some amazing things for the societies in which they existed.I do n't think anyone has denied they have done some amazing things.If they have , they are simply wrong.Those facts however do not at all change the fact that they enslaved an 8 year old child.By that thinking , I too can enslave an 8 year old child legally , because prior to that I have done some pretty nice and amazing things.How many old ladies do I need to help across the street before murder is OK ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However, even the most jaded, cynical atheist cannot deny that organized religions have also done some amazing things for the societies in which they existed.I don't think anyone has denied they have done some amazing things.If they have, they are simply wrong.Those facts however do not at all change the fact that they enslaved an 8 year old child.By that thinking, I too can enslave an 8 year old child legally, because prior to that I have done some pretty nice and amazing things.How many old ladies do I need to help across the street before murder is OK?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289492</id>
	<title>Re:Scientology as a force for good?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259664780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Umm...<br> <br>

Hitler wasn't a scientologist?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm.. . Hitler was n't a scientologist ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm... 

Hitler wasn't a scientologist?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290910</id>
	<title>Re:FLSA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259670960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>the word to describe people who lack skepticism is "gullible"</p></div></blockquote><p>And what's the word to describe people who refuse to believe a claim despite the evidence?</p><p>Hint: It isn't "skeptic".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the word to describe people who lack skepticism is " gullible " And what 's the word to describe people who refuse to believe a claim despite the evidence ? Hint : It is n't " skeptic " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the word to describe people who lack skepticism is "gullible"And what's the word to describe people who refuse to believe a claim despite the evidence?Hint: It isn't "skeptic".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289628</id>
	<title>Re:Scientology as a force for good?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259665320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I think the bad reputation marks against Scientology are getting a lot of press, but in defense of the poor guy getting beat up, are there any good things to say about Scientology?</p></div></blockquote><p>That's really hard, because the benefits of most religions are often highly subjective.  The only defense I can think of is that they could be a lot worse (ie. Jonestown, Heaven's Gate), and they certainly aren't worse than the TV evangelist types who also rake in obscene amounts of money from the True Believers.</p><p>I remember one article I read on them stated that their biggest problem is their intense paranoia of the outside world.  A lot of the reasons they've done some of the nasty things they've done (like infiltrating Ontario government offices in the 1970s) are ill-informed and misjudged attempts at security.</p><p>L. Ron Hubbard was most certainly a con artist, but he was also a bit of a paranoid type, not to mention the self-aggrandizing that he got out of a lot of the cloak-and-dagger bullshit.  The problem for $cientologists after him is that I think a lot of them didn't get the joke.  In short, their inheritors of L. Ron's madness, but in a more pure and fanatical form.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the bad reputation marks against Scientology are getting a lot of press , but in defense of the poor guy getting beat up , are there any good things to say about Scientology ? That 's really hard , because the benefits of most religions are often highly subjective .
The only defense I can think of is that they could be a lot worse ( ie .
Jonestown , Heaven 's Gate ) , and they certainly are n't worse than the TV evangelist types who also rake in obscene amounts of money from the True Believers.I remember one article I read on them stated that their biggest problem is their intense paranoia of the outside world .
A lot of the reasons they 've done some of the nasty things they 've done ( like infiltrating Ontario government offices in the 1970s ) are ill-informed and misjudged attempts at security.L .
Ron Hubbard was most certainly a con artist , but he was also a bit of a paranoid type , not to mention the self-aggrandizing that he got out of a lot of the cloak-and-dagger bullshit .
The problem for $ cientologists after him is that I think a lot of them did n't get the joke .
In short , their inheritors of L. Ron 's madness , but in a more pure and fanatical form .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the bad reputation marks against Scientology are getting a lot of press, but in defense of the poor guy getting beat up, are there any good things to say about Scientology?That's really hard, because the benefits of most religions are often highly subjective.
The only defense I can think of is that they could be a lot worse (ie.
Jonestown, Heaven's Gate), and they certainly aren't worse than the TV evangelist types who also rake in obscene amounts of money from the True Believers.I remember one article I read on them stated that their biggest problem is their intense paranoia of the outside world.
A lot of the reasons they've done some of the nasty things they've done (like infiltrating Ontario government offices in the 1970s) are ill-informed and misjudged attempts at security.L.
Ron Hubbard was most certainly a con artist, but he was also a bit of a paranoid type, not to mention the self-aggrandizing that he got out of a lot of the cloak-and-dagger bullshit.
The problem for $cientologists after him is that I think a lot of them didn't get the joke.
In short, their inheritors of L. Ron's madness, but in a more pure and fanatical form.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295076</id>
	<title>Re:I love it!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259576460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, just because it isn't gonna happen doesn't mean there couldn't be a Slashdot article about it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , just because it is n't gon na happen does n't mean there could n't be a Slashdot article about it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, just because it isn't gonna happen doesn't mean there couldn't be a Slashdot article about it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289186</id>
	<title>I love it!</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1259663460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now if we can see a slashdot article saying that they were found guilty and someone went to prison for it... the fat lady ain't sang yet, boys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now if we can see a slashdot article saying that they were found guilty and someone went to prison for it... the fat lady ai n't sang yet , boys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now if we can see a slashdot article saying that they were found guilty and someone went to prison for it... the fat lady ain't sang yet, boys.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290330</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1259668380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And that topic is that Scientology apparently enslaved this person.</p></div><p>And not misguided Scientologists, not a subsidiary of CoS, the CoS.  With the Catholic diversion posts, an argument can be made that the Catholic Church and Catholic (Cristian) faiths are not one in the same.  With the CoS, their heavy copyright on the faith documents means that Scientology and Church of Scientology are one in the same.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And that topic is that Scientology apparently enslaved this person.And not misguided Scientologists , not a subsidiary of CoS , the CoS. With the Catholic diversion posts , an argument can be made that the Catholic Church and Catholic ( Cristian ) faiths are not one in the same .
With the CoS , their heavy copyright on the faith documents means that Scientology and Church of Scientology are one in the same .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And that topic is that Scientology apparently enslaved this person.And not misguided Scientologists, not a subsidiary of CoS, the CoS.  With the Catholic diversion posts, an argument can be made that the Catholic Church and Catholic (Cristian) faiths are not one in the same.
With the CoS, their heavy copyright on the faith documents means that Scientology and Church of Scientology are one in the same.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291826</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>thoughtspace</author>
	<datestamp>1259675700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <b>All organized religion should be treated with utter contempt.</b></p> </div><p>
Hear! Hear! What we need is more disorganised religion.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All organized religion should be treated with utter contempt .
Hear ! Hear !
What we need is more disorganised religion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> All organized religion should be treated with utter contempt.
Hear! Hear!
What we need is more disorganised religion.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30300416</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>operagost</author>
	<datestamp>1259610900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That episode of The Next Generation was totally rad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That episode of The Next Generation was totally rad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That episode of The Next Generation was totally rad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298274</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289240</id>
	<title>Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave"</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1259663760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Silly fool, working for $50 a week. Lord Xenu pays *his* slaves $100 a week.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Silly fool , working for $ 50 a week .
Lord Xenu pays * his * slaves $ 100 a week .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Silly fool, working for $50 a week.
Lord Xenu pays *his* slaves $100 a week.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291124</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1259672100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Hmm, how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism, trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?"</p><p>The comparisons I make tend to show why both should be attacked. Superstition deserves contempt, and sustained attack can pay off for those who value humanity over nonsense.</p><p>Note that the Catholic Church base of support has now moved to the most simple and backward people. It is growing strong in Africa, and in the US many churches rely on congregations of ignorant immigrants.</p><p>Expose religion to the weapons that work against it, which are scorn and contempt. Laugh at it and the fools who believe it, for it deserves no more protection than any non-superstitious belief. The Catholics grovel before priests who bugger their children (the hundreds of millions of hush money/settlement dollars prove my point), and Scientologists grovel before leaders who enslave them. How's THAT for an apt comparison?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Hmm , how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism , trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion ?
" The comparisons I make tend to show why both should be attacked .
Superstition deserves contempt , and sustained attack can pay off for those who value humanity over nonsense.Note that the Catholic Church base of support has now moved to the most simple and backward people .
It is growing strong in Africa , and in the US many churches rely on congregations of ignorant immigrants.Expose religion to the weapons that work against it , which are scorn and contempt .
Laugh at it and the fools who believe it , for it deserves no more protection than any non-superstitious belief .
The Catholics grovel before priests who bugger their children ( the hundreds of millions of hush money/settlement dollars prove my point ) , and Scientologists grovel before leaders who enslave them .
How 's THAT for an apt comparison ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Hmm, how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism, trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?
"The comparisons I make tend to show why both should be attacked.
Superstition deserves contempt, and sustained attack can pay off for those who value humanity over nonsense.Note that the Catholic Church base of support has now moved to the most simple and backward people.
It is growing strong in Africa, and in the US many churches rely on congregations of ignorant immigrants.Expose religion to the weapons that work against it, which are scorn and contempt.
Laugh at it and the fools who believe it, for it deserves no more protection than any non-superstitious belief.
The Catholics grovel before priests who bugger their children (the hundreds of millions of hush money/settlement dollars prove my point), and Scientologists grovel before leaders who enslave them.
How's THAT for an apt comparison?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292976</id>
	<title>Re:No difference than the Christian cult</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259683920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No definition of cult has anything in it about a penalty for leaving.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No definition of cult has anything in it about a penalty for leaving .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No definition of cult has anything in it about a penalty for leaving.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290278</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290446</id>
	<title>Re:FLSA</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1259668920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is the barbed wire on the inside or outside of the top of the fence?  The way it leans tells a story.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is the barbed wire on the inside or outside of the top of the fence ?
The way it leans tells a story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is the barbed wire on the inside or outside of the top of the fence?
The way it leans tells a story.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292356</id>
	<title>Re:No difference than the Christian cult</title>
	<author>Crypto Gnome</author>
	<datestamp>1259679060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It doesn't matter that here in North America we tend to be fond of a particular one.</p></div><p>What do you mean "we", kemosabe?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't matter that here in North America we tend to be fond of a particular one.What do you mean " we " , kemosabe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't matter that here in North America we tend to be fond of a particular one.What do you mean "we", kemosabe?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291316</id>
	<title>Re:I love it!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259672940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1031366/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">Law &amp; Order</a> [imdb.com] ran an episode called "Bogeyman" about this.  The people in the movement are said to be working behind the scenes to boost each other into power positions to protect themselves.  Naturally, a murder is involved.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Law &amp; Order [ imdb.com ] ran an episode called " Bogeyman " about this .
The people in the movement are said to be working behind the scenes to boost each other into power positions to protect themselves .
Naturally , a murder is involved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Law &amp; Order [imdb.com] ran an episode called "Bogeyman" about this.
The people in the movement are said to be working behind the scenes to boost each other into power positions to protect themselves.
Naturally, a murder is involved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289408</id>
	<title>Re:Scientology as a force for good?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259664480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They take the money of the rich and stupid.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They take the money of the rich and stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They take the money of the rich and stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289364</id>
	<title>Charged or charging?</title>
	<author>vvaduva</author>
	<datestamp>1259664300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the headline is wrong...they usually charge people for services, not vice versa! wtf?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the headline is wrong...they usually charge people for services , not vice versa !
wtf ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the headline is wrong...they usually charge people for services, not vice versa!
wtf?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30294890</id>
	<title>So when are you going to start boycotting these...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259574120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://scientology.tribe.net/thread/f7cb344e-966e-4b76-8fb7-e84155d57afa" title="tribe.net" rel="nofollow">http://scientology.tribe.net/thread/f7cb344e-966e-4b76-8fb7-e84155d57afa</a> [tribe.net]</p><p>Support any of these people and you're supporting Scientology.</p><p>Such a shame that actors from some of your favourite shows are on there, hey?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //scientology.tribe.net/thread/f7cb344e-966e-4b76-8fb7-e84155d57afa [ tribe.net ] Support any of these people and you 're supporting Scientology.Such a shame that actors from some of your favourite shows are on there , hey ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://scientology.tribe.net/thread/f7cb344e-966e-4b76-8fb7-e84155d57afa [tribe.net]Support any of these people and you're supporting Scientology.Such a shame that actors from some of your favourite shows are on there, hey?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289350</id>
	<title>Re:How Is This Nerd News??!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259664240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Scientology has become relevant to Slashdot and its readership ever since <a href="http://slashdot.org/yro/01/03/16/1256226.shtml?tid=153" title="slashdot.org">CoS removed content from Slashdot under DMCA</a> [slashdot.org]. It's quote  obviously News for Nerds now, and, noting the DMCA reference (and the fact that it's common CoS practice, not a single isolated case), definitely related to Your Rights Online. If it's still not clear, try posting OT-III materials in a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. comments and see how that goes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Scientology has become relevant to Slashdot and its readership ever since CoS removed content from Slashdot under DMCA [ slashdot.org ] .
It 's quote obviously News for Nerds now , and , noting the DMCA reference ( and the fact that it 's common CoS practice , not a single isolated case ) , definitely related to Your Rights Online .
If it 's still not clear , try posting OT-III materials in a / .
comments and see how that goes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scientology has become relevant to Slashdot and its readership ever since CoS removed content from Slashdot under DMCA [slashdot.org].
It's quote  obviously News for Nerds now, and, noting the DMCA reference (and the fact that it's common CoS practice, not a single isolated case), definitely related to Your Rights Online.
If it's still not clear, try posting OT-III materials in a /.
comments and see how that goes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30294992</id>
	<title>Re:Gold Base (Gilman Springs, CA)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259575320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>looks like it faces outward if you zoom in (the poles kink out at the top).<br>probably an electric substation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>looks like it faces outward if you zoom in ( the poles kink out at the top ) .probably an electric substation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>looks like it faces outward if you zoom in (the poles kink out at the top).probably an electric substation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291774</id>
	<title>Re:How Is This Nerd News??!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259675520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>behold! xenu speaks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>behold !
xenu speaks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>behold!
xenu speaks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290880</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259670900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>as long as your ok with the unorganized ones i&rsquo;m good with that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>as long as your ok with the unorganized ones i    m good with that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as long as your ok with the unorganized ones i’m good with that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290396</id>
	<title>Why do I get the sneaky feeling that...</title>
	<author>thelonious</author>
	<datestamp>1259668680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this lawsuit is a bunch of bumblebrush headed for no where but therapy</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this lawsuit is a bunch of bumblebrush headed for no where but therapy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this lawsuit is a bunch of bumblebrush headed for no where but therapy</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295112</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>dcollins117</author>
	<datestamp>1259576880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Do you actually believe in the *electron*?</p></div><p>Actually, I do. I believe there are many of them, right here in this room.</p><p>As for the matter of the virgin birth, I think there is a better explanation than quantum mechanics. I think that Mary has been holding out on us.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you actually believe in the * electron * ? Actually , I do .
I believe there are many of them , right here in this room.As for the matter of the virgin birth , I think there is a better explanation than quantum mechanics .
I think that Mary has been holding out on us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you actually believe in the *electron*?Actually, I do.
I believe there are many of them, right here in this room.As for the matter of the virgin birth, I think there is a better explanation than quantum mechanics.
I think that Mary has been holding out on us.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498</id>
	<title>Yes...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259664780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not fan of scientology, or any cult really - but a mainstream organization with illegal work camps?  I just never expected that, at all.  You'd think the lid would have come off something that extreme some time ago.  And what are they even having them do in these camps, build the theta monitors?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not fan of scientology , or any cult really - but a mainstream organization with illegal work camps ?
I just never expected that , at all .
You 'd think the lid would have come off something that extreme some time ago .
And what are they even having them do in these camps , build the theta monitors ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not fan of scientology, or any cult really - but a mainstream organization with illegal work camps?
I just never expected that, at all.
You'd think the lid would have come off something that extreme some time ago.
And what are they even having them do in these camps, build the theta monitors?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295824</id>
	<title>Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave"</title>
	<author>stupid\_is</author>
	<datestamp>1259585820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You don't count being held in a compound surrounded by razor wire and forced to work 16-24 hours a day at age 8 as "involuntary servitude"? Wow, you must have had a much rougher childhood than me.</p></div><p>When I was a child, that was considered <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe1a1wHxTyo" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">luxury</a> [youtube.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't count being held in a compound surrounded by razor wire and forced to work 16-24 hours a day at age 8 as " involuntary servitude " ?
Wow , you must have had a much rougher childhood than me.When I was a child , that was considered luxury [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't count being held in a compound surrounded by razor wire and forced to work 16-24 hours a day at age 8 as "involuntary servitude"?
Wow, you must have had a much rougher childhood than me.When I was a child, that was considered luxury [youtube.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>Xtravar</author>
	<datestamp>1259664360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm, how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism, trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?</p><p>Let's stick to the topic at hand, shall we?  And that topic is that Scientology apparently enslaved this person.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism , trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion ? Let 's stick to the topic at hand , shall we ?
And that topic is that Scientology apparently enslaved this person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism, trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?Let's stick to the topic at hand, shall we?
And that topic is that Scientology apparently enslaved this person.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290642</id>
	<title>Slaves rescued?</title>
	<author>thelonious</author>
	<datestamp>1259669820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anyone have a post to the corresponding story where the D.A. takes some police officers to bust the slave camp up?  You know, where people rush up to him and yell "we are free!  finally someone to set us free!".  Hasn't that happened yet?  No?!?!  You mean they are just going to let the slaves who haven't escaped rot in there?  Oh, the humanity</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone have a post to the corresponding story where the D.A .
takes some police officers to bust the slave camp up ?
You know , where people rush up to him and yell " we are free !
finally someone to set us free ! " .
Has n't that happened yet ?
No ? ! ? ! You mean they are just going to let the slaves who have n't escaped rot in there ?
Oh , the humanity</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone have a post to the corresponding story where the D.A.
takes some police officers to bust the slave camp up?
You know, where people rush up to him and yell "we are free!
finally someone to set us free!".
Hasn't that happened yet?
No?!?!  You mean they are just going to let the slaves who haven't escaped rot in there?
Oh, the humanity</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291956</id>
	<title>Re:Ah My Homeland</title>
	<author>dbIII</author>
	<datestamp>1259676540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> Exposing Scientology for the cult and crime syndicate it is</p></div></blockquote><p>The tricky bit is seperating the two things in peoples heads, if Scientology is a religeous cult then so was the IRA.  This scam is so bad it actually gets credibility when they fool people into thinking they are a cult and not just a bizzare twist of organised crime.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exposing Scientology for the cult and crime syndicate it isThe tricky bit is seperating the two things in peoples heads , if Scientology is a religeous cult then so was the IRA .
This scam is so bad it actually gets credibility when they fool people into thinking they are a cult and not just a bizzare twist of organised crime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Exposing Scientology for the cult and crime syndicate it isThe tricky bit is seperating the two things in peoples heads, if Scientology is a religeous cult then so was the IRA.
This scam is so bad it actually gets credibility when they fool people into thinking they are a cult and not just a bizzare twist of organised crime.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290062</id>
	<title>Re:FLSA</title>
	<author>Lord Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1259667060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My boyscout camp had roll calls. "Gated communities" have guards and fences.  Even some private schools have roll call, guards, and fences. Hell, my cushy office building has guards. These things are not, on their own, evidence of a crime.</p><p>If guards were to testify that they were trained to keep people from leaving, rather than to keep people safe from outsiders, we may have evidence of a crime. So far, though, we just have one man's unsubstantiated claims.</p><p>(BTW: the word to describe people who lack skepticism is "gullible")</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My boyscout camp had roll calls .
" Gated communities " have guards and fences .
Even some private schools have roll call , guards , and fences .
Hell , my cushy office building has guards .
These things are not , on their own , evidence of a crime.If guards were to testify that they were trained to keep people from leaving , rather than to keep people safe from outsiders , we may have evidence of a crime .
So far , though , we just have one man 's unsubstantiated claims .
( BTW : the word to describe people who lack skepticism is " gullible " )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My boyscout camp had roll calls.
"Gated communities" have guards and fences.
Even some private schools have roll call, guards, and fences.
Hell, my cushy office building has guards.
These things are not, on their own, evidence of a crime.If guards were to testify that they were trained to keep people from leaving, rather than to keep people safe from outsiders, we may have evidence of a crime.
So far, though, we just have one man's unsubstantiated claims.
(BTW: the word to describe people who lack skepticism is "gullible")</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289570</id>
	<title>Re:FLSA</title>
	<author>LOLLinux</author>
	<datestamp>1259665080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>For the slavery charge, he would need to prove that he tried to quit/leave but was forcibly prevented from doing so. Did he call the police on such occasions?</p></div><p>Yes because when you are held captive against your will somewhere the people holding you there will make sure you have ready access to phones so that you can call the police.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For the slavery charge , he would need to prove that he tried to quit/leave but was forcibly prevented from doing so .
Did he call the police on such occasions ? Yes because when you are held captive against your will somewhere the people holding you there will make sure you have ready access to phones so that you can call the police .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the slavery charge, he would need to prove that he tried to quit/leave but was forcibly prevented from doing so.
Did he call the police on such occasions?Yes because when you are held captive against your will somewhere the people holding you there will make sure you have ready access to phones so that you can call the police.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290028</id>
	<title>Re:Scientology as a force for good?</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1259666880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Umm...</p><p>Hitler wasn't a scientologist?</p></div><p>Oh, my, a Reverse Godwin! Ladies and Gentlemen, I think we have our winner.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm...Hitler was n't a scientologist ? Oh , my , a Reverse Godwin !
Ladies and Gentlemen , I think we have our winner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm...Hitler wasn't a scientologist?Oh, my, a Reverse Godwin!
Ladies and Gentlemen, I think we have our winner.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291962</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259676600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Supposedly Hubbard didn't dream it up... he allegedly stole the occult framework from Jack Parsons of early JPL fame, then stole Parson's yacht and wife as well. Parsons, in turn, got his ideology from Crowley while serving as one of Crowley's cash cows/organizers in the States.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Supposedly Hubbard did n't dream it up... he allegedly stole the occult framework from Jack Parsons of early JPL fame , then stole Parson 's yacht and wife as well .
Parsons , in turn , got his ideology from Crowley while serving as one of Crowley 's cash cows/organizers in the States .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Supposedly Hubbard didn't dream it up... he allegedly stole the occult framework from Jack Parsons of early JPL fame, then stole Parson's yacht and wife as well.
Parsons, in turn, got his ideology from Crowley while serving as one of Crowley's cash cows/organizers in the States.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291274</id>
	<title>Re:No difference than the Christian cult</title>
	<author>fermion</author>
	<datestamp>1259672700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is not the greatest example, but the element of truth is there.  Many people want to separate the church of scientology from mainstream religions because the scientology people highlight so much of the corruption inherent in the system.  For instance, the catholic church has clearly been abusing boys for a very long time.  We recently saw a report saying some of the irish church and police knew this to be true,
<p>
We now have mega churches controlled by a single family, not owned by the congregation.  In such cases, it is very unclear how much of the volunteer work benefits the family, not the church, and how much is actually church related.  We have profit making bookstores in location that are supposed to on tax exempt property.  We have no transparency, and so do not know how many so-called holy people are, for all practical intents and purposes, enslaving congregants for personal gain. Or how many continue to demand sexual favors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not the greatest example , but the element of truth is there .
Many people want to separate the church of scientology from mainstream religions because the scientology people highlight so much of the corruption inherent in the system .
For instance , the catholic church has clearly been abusing boys for a very long time .
We recently saw a report saying some of the irish church and police knew this to be true , We now have mega churches controlled by a single family , not owned by the congregation .
In such cases , it is very unclear how much of the volunteer work benefits the family , not the church , and how much is actually church related .
We have profit making bookstores in location that are supposed to on tax exempt property .
We have no transparency , and so do not know how many so-called holy people are , for all practical intents and purposes , enslaving congregants for personal gain .
Or how many continue to demand sexual favors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not the greatest example, but the element of truth is there.
Many people want to separate the church of scientology from mainstream religions because the scientology people highlight so much of the corruption inherent in the system.
For instance, the catholic church has clearly been abusing boys for a very long time.
We recently saw a report saying some of the irish church and police knew this to be true,

We now have mega churches controlled by a single family, not owned by the congregation.
In such cases, it is very unclear how much of the volunteer work benefits the family, not the church, and how much is actually church related.
We have profit making bookstores in location that are supposed to on tax exempt property.
We have no transparency, and so do not know how many so-called holy people are, for all practical intents and purposes, enslaving congregants for personal gain.
Or how many continue to demand sexual favors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289614</id>
	<title>Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259665260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps he should be investigated for not filing taxes on his $50 a week.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps he should be investigated for not filing taxes on his $ 50 a week .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps he should be investigated for not filing taxes on his $50 a week.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290518</id>
	<title>Re:FLSA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259669280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are missing his age.  Slavery becomes much easier to prove if it's a child.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are missing his age .
Slavery becomes much easier to prove if it 's a child .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are missing his age.
Slavery becomes much easier to prove if it's a child.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289254</id>
	<title>Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259663820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't believe you actually did check. Every definition of slavery has nothing to do with compensation or lack thereof, and everything to do with being bound, out of your control, in service to another.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't believe you actually did check .
Every definition of slavery has nothing to do with compensation or lack thereof , and everything to do with being bound , out of your control , in service to another .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't believe you actually did check.
Every definition of slavery has nothing to do with compensation or lack thereof, and everything to do with being bound, out of your control, in service to another.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289356</id>
	<title>Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave"</title>
	<author>Suiggy</author>
	<datestamp>1259664300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pay as meager as $50 is similar to the allowance given to indentured servants back in old times. He was also forced into labor, he couldn't leave. That $50 had to be spent on the compound at the canteen. It was slavery.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pay as meager as $ 50 is similar to the allowance given to indentured servants back in old times .
He was also forced into labor , he could n't leave .
That $ 50 had to be spent on the compound at the canteen .
It was slavery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pay as meager as $50 is similar to the allowance given to indentured servants back in old times.
He was also forced into labor, he couldn't leave.
That $50 had to be spent on the compound at the canteen.
It was slavery.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293248</id>
	<title>Anonymous: RACISM &amp; RELIGIOUS HATRED</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259686500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/intolerance-hate/anonymous/" title="religiousf...mwatch.org" rel="nofollow">Behind The Facade Of The &ldquo;ANONYMOUS&rdquo; Hate Group Part 1</a> [religiousf...mwatch.org]<br><a href="http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/intolerance-hate/anonymous/anonymous-racism-religious-hatred/" title="religiousf...mwatch.org" rel="nofollow">Behind The Facade Of The &ldquo;ANONYMOUS&rdquo; Hate Group Part 2</a> [religiousf...mwatch.org]</p><p>In early 2008, Anonymous launched 141 million malicious hits against Church of Scientology websites, in an attempt to bring down those sites. During the same period, there were 41 death threats, 56 bomb and arson threats, 103 other threats of violence and 40 incidents of vandalism against the Church. One Anonymous member now faces criminal charges for those DDoS attacks.</p><p><a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/attack-on-scientology-website-sends-new-jersey-man-to-jail-on-felony-charges-70539057.html/" title="prnewswire.com" rel="nofollow">Attack on Scientology Website Sends New Jersey Man to Jail on Felony Charges</a> [prnewswire.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Behind The Facade Of The    ANONYMOUS    Hate Group Part 1 [ religiousf...mwatch.org ] Behind The Facade Of The    ANONYMOUS    Hate Group Part 2 [ religiousf...mwatch.org ] In early 2008 , Anonymous launched 141 million malicious hits against Church of Scientology websites , in an attempt to bring down those sites .
During the same period , there were 41 death threats , 56 bomb and arson threats , 103 other threats of violence and 40 incidents of vandalism against the Church .
One Anonymous member now faces criminal charges for those DDoS attacks.Attack on Scientology Website Sends New Jersey Man to Jail on Felony Charges [ prnewswire.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Behind The Facade Of The “ANONYMOUS” Hate Group Part 1 [religiousf...mwatch.org]Behind The Facade Of The “ANONYMOUS” Hate Group Part 2 [religiousf...mwatch.org]In early 2008, Anonymous launched 141 million malicious hits against Church of Scientology websites, in an attempt to bring down those sites.
During the same period, there were 41 death threats, 56 bomb and arson threats, 103 other threats of violence and 40 incidents of vandalism against the Church.
One Anonymous member now faces criminal charges for those DDoS attacks.Attack on Scientology Website Sends New Jersey Man to Jail on Felony Charges [prnewswire.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293790</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>Meski</author>
	<datestamp>1259691300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So how are they not a religion? Just substitute "science fiction" with "fantasy" and you have pretty much every religion out there.</p></div><p>With the exception of The Church of the flying spaghetti monster.  You've pretty much got to accept that one as genuine.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:^) {1]<br> <br>

[1] I feel unclean, putting the tongue-in-cheek emoticon there.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So how are they not a religion ?
Just substitute " science fiction " with " fantasy " and you have pretty much every religion out there.With the exception of The Church of the flying spaghetti monster .
You 've pretty much got to accept that one as genuine .
: ^ ) { 1 ] [ 1 ] I feel unclean , putting the tongue-in-cheek emoticon there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how are they not a religion?
Just substitute "science fiction" with "fantasy" and you have pretty much every religion out there.With the exception of The Church of the flying spaghetti monster.
You've pretty much got to accept that one as genuine.
:^) {1] 

[1] I feel unclean, putting the tongue-in-cheek emoticon there.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290862</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259670840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Scientology is as legitimate a religion as Catholicism.</p><p>Yes, they both are built on fairy tales.</p><p>Yes, they're both cults which enslave and abuse their members.</p><p>Yes, they should both be abolished.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Scientology is as legitimate a religion as Catholicism.Yes , they both are built on fairy tales.Yes , they 're both cults which enslave and abuse their members.Yes , they should both be abolished .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scientology is as legitimate a religion as Catholicism.Yes, they both are built on fairy tales.Yes, they're both cults which enslave and abuse their members.Yes, they should both be abolished.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291136</id>
	<title>Re:Gold Base (Gilman Springs, CA)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259672100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is so cool - followed your link to Gold Base then switched to Google street view. At the corner of their property I saw a <a href="http://tiny.cc/rvTO6" title="tiny.cc" rel="nofollow">small compound with a cement block building - surrounded by a barbed-wire fence facing <i>inward</i>!</a> [tiny.cc]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is so cool - followed your link to Gold Base then switched to Google street view .
At the corner of their property I saw a small compound with a cement block building - surrounded by a barbed-wire fence facing inward !
[ tiny.cc ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is so cool - followed your link to Gold Base then switched to Google street view.
At the corner of their property I saw a small compound with a cement block building - surrounded by a barbed-wire fence facing inward!
[tiny.cc]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291030</id>
	<title>Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259671620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Slaves aren't paid, last I checked. Did he file a 1099?</p></div><p>Even black slaves before the civil war were paid. Many bought there freedom after a while, and in true hilarity, many ended up becoming slave owners them self.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Slaves are n't paid , last I checked .
Did he file a 1099 ? Even black slaves before the civil war were paid .
Many bought there freedom after a while , and in true hilarity , many ended up becoming slave owners them self .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slaves aren't paid, last I checked.
Did he file a 1099?Even black slaves before the civil war were paid.
Many bought there freedom after a while, and in true hilarity, many ended up becoming slave owners them self.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182</id>
	<title>If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259663460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slaves aren't paid, last I checked. Did he file a 1099?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slaves are n't paid , last I checked .
Did he file a 1099 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slaves aren't paid, last I checked.
Did he file a 1099?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292048</id>
	<title>David Miscavige in Freedom Magazine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259677200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>David Miscavige: at the Helm of Scientology's Explosive Growth</p><p><a href="http://www.freedommag.org/" title="freedommag.org" rel="nofollow">Freedom Magazine</a> [freedommag.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>David Miscavige : at the Helm of Scientology 's Explosive GrowthFreedom Magazine [ freedommag.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>David Miscavige: at the Helm of Scientology's Explosive GrowthFreedom Magazine [freedommag.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>corbettw</author>
	<datestamp>1259670000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Most other countries don't even recognize them as a religion. They are a money making / power grabbing scheme dreamed up by a second rate megalomaniac science fiction author that has now taken on a life of its own.</p></div><p>So how are they not a religion? Just substitute "science fiction" with "fantasy" and you have pretty much every religion out there.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most other countries do n't even recognize them as a religion .
They are a money making / power grabbing scheme dreamed up by a second rate megalomaniac science fiction author that has now taken on a life of its own.So how are they not a religion ?
Just substitute " science fiction " with " fantasy " and you have pretty much every religion out there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most other countries don't even recognize them as a religion.
They are a money making / power grabbing scheme dreamed up by a second rate megalomaniac science fiction author that has now taken on a life of its own.So how are they not a religion?
Just substitute "science fiction" with "fantasy" and you have pretty much every religion out there.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292126</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259677680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>His point is that Scientology should not be classified as a religion. Did you even read the post you quoted?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>His point is that Scientology should not be classified as a religion .
Did you even read the post you quoted ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His point is that Scientology should not be classified as a religion.
Did you even read the post you quoted?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30303450</id>
	<title>Re:No difference than the Christian cult</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259578380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yeah, my parents had me in church a lot as a kid. As an adult, I pretty much stopped going. Know what? My mom still likes me and I still have plenty of friends who go to church, and as far as I know none of them have shunned me as a pariah. I don't think you can really give a group "cult" status when there's no penalty for leaving and they're still nice to you afterward.</p></div><p>Heh, you must not live in the deep south.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , my parents had me in church a lot as a kid .
As an adult , I pretty much stopped going .
Know what ?
My mom still likes me and I still have plenty of friends who go to church , and as far as I know none of them have shunned me as a pariah .
I do n't think you can really give a group " cult " status when there 's no penalty for leaving and they 're still nice to you afterward.Heh , you must not live in the deep south .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, my parents had me in church a lot as a kid.
As an adult, I pretty much stopped going.
Know what?
My mom still likes me and I still have plenty of friends who go to church, and as far as I know none of them have shunned me as a pariah.
I don't think you can really give a group "cult" status when there's no penalty for leaving and they're still nice to you afterward.Heh, you must not live in the deep south.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290278</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292192</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>LihTox</author>
	<datestamp>1259678040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The distinction between a religion and a cult, to my mind, isn't the quality of their beliefs-- we all believe utterly ridiculous things.  (Do you actually believe in the *electron*?  Or that we're all actually collections of waves?  Quantum mechanics is as ridiculous as the virgin birth-- in fact, quantum mechanics ALLOWS for the virgin birth, since everything is possible (if highly improbable) in quantum mechanics).  The difference is in the sincerity of the religion/cult's founders and leadership: do *they* believe in what they're saying, and are they primarily motivated by their belief?  I personally think that Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Baha'i, Buddhism, etc were founded in all sincerity, and even through the contempt I feel for the evangelical Christian movement, and for the Pope (speaking as a Catholic), I think they are acting from a position of sincerity.</p><p>Scientology, on the other hand, was founded by a science fiction writer who is on record saying that founding a fake religion would be a great way to make money.  Now, I think there are a number of Scientologists who are sincerely so, but I don't trust their leadership, and that makes them a cult to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The distinction between a religion and a cult , to my mind , is n't the quality of their beliefs-- we all believe utterly ridiculous things .
( Do you actually believe in the * electron * ?
Or that we 're all actually collections of waves ?
Quantum mechanics is as ridiculous as the virgin birth-- in fact , quantum mechanics ALLOWS for the virgin birth , since everything is possible ( if highly improbable ) in quantum mechanics ) .
The difference is in the sincerity of the religion/cult 's founders and leadership : do * they * believe in what they 're saying , and are they primarily motivated by their belief ?
I personally think that Judaism , Christianity , Islam , Baha'i , Buddhism , etc were founded in all sincerity , and even through the contempt I feel for the evangelical Christian movement , and for the Pope ( speaking as a Catholic ) , I think they are acting from a position of sincerity.Scientology , on the other hand , was founded by a science fiction writer who is on record saying that founding a fake religion would be a great way to make money .
Now , I think there are a number of Scientologists who are sincerely so , but I do n't trust their leadership , and that makes them a cult to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The distinction between a religion and a cult, to my mind, isn't the quality of their beliefs-- we all believe utterly ridiculous things.
(Do you actually believe in the *electron*?
Or that we're all actually collections of waves?
Quantum mechanics is as ridiculous as the virgin birth-- in fact, quantum mechanics ALLOWS for the virgin birth, since everything is possible (if highly improbable) in quantum mechanics).
The difference is in the sincerity of the religion/cult's founders and leadership: do *they* believe in what they're saying, and are they primarily motivated by their belief?
I personally think that Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Baha'i, Buddhism, etc were founded in all sincerity, and even through the contempt I feel for the evangelical Christian movement, and for the Pope (speaking as a Catholic), I think they are acting from a position of sincerity.Scientology, on the other hand, was founded by a science fiction writer who is on record saying that founding a fake religion would be a great way to make money.
Now, I think there are a number of Scientologists who are sincerely so, but I don't trust their leadership, and that makes them a cult to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290978</id>
	<title>Parents Rights &amp; Freedom of Contract</title>
	<author>AlexLibman</author>
	<datestamp>1259671320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If he started working there with the permission of his parents, and if his "right to emancipation" was not violated, and if he stayed there of his own free will - then there is a chance that the Church of Scientology has done nothing wrong, at least according to a rational approach to what law ought to be.</p><p>Government interventionism in private contracts (i.e. minimum wage) and family life (i.e. child labor laws) are socialist bullshit imposed by demagogues in order to legitimize their power!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If he started working there with the permission of his parents , and if his " right to emancipation " was not violated , and if he stayed there of his own free will - then there is a chance that the Church of Scientology has done nothing wrong , at least according to a rational approach to what law ought to be.Government interventionism in private contracts ( i.e .
minimum wage ) and family life ( i.e .
child labor laws ) are socialist bullshit imposed by demagogues in order to legitimize their power !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If he started working there with the permission of his parents, and if his "right to emancipation" was not violated, and if he stayed there of his own free will - then there is a chance that the Church of Scientology has done nothing wrong, at least according to a rational approach to what law ought to be.Government interventionism in private contracts (i.e.
minimum wage) and family life (i.e.
child labor laws) are socialist bullshit imposed by demagogues in order to legitimize their power!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293368</id>
	<title>Re:Yes...</title>
	<author>jhol13</author>
	<datestamp>1259687820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It always amazes me how ready people are to bash religions while at the same time think they can change the future. After all, according to every <b>scientific</b> theory we have changing the future is impossible.</p><p>Maybe they are frightened of the religions and what they propose?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It always amazes me how ready people are to bash religions while at the same time think they can change the future .
After all , according to every scientific theory we have changing the future is impossible.Maybe they are frightened of the religions and what they propose ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It always amazes me how ready people are to bash religions while at the same time think they can change the future.
After all, according to every scientific theory we have changing the future is impossible.Maybe they are frightened of the religions and what they propose?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289720</id>
	<title>Re:FLSA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259665740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Armed guards, security posts and 3 roll calls per day, but you can just leave any time. Yeah, good luck finding a judge that buys that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Armed guards , security posts and 3 roll calls per day , but you can just leave any time .
Yeah , good luck finding a judge that buys that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Armed guards, security posts and 3 roll calls per day, but you can just leave any time.
Yeah, good luck finding a judge that buys that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295416</id>
	<title>Tom Cruise is the Charles Manson of Religion</title>
	<author>JamesonLewis3rd</author>
	<datestamp>1259580600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Rumor has it that this is a not-so-well-kept secret.  I avert my eyes from his image and mute the audio immediately upon being confronted.  I then switch to Military Channel.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rumor has it that this is a not-so-well-kept secret .
I avert my eyes from his image and mute the audio immediately upon being confronted .
I then switch to Military Channel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rumor has it that this is a not-so-well-kept secret.
I avert my eyes from his image and mute the audio immediately upon being confronted.
I then switch to Military Channel.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290690</id>
	<title>freeloader's debt</title>
	<author>un1xl0ser</author>
	<datestamp>1259670120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So if the defendant is trying to get back pay, then aren't they just going to pull the "freeloader's debt" thing, and sue him for unpaid auditing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So if the defendant is trying to get back pay , then are n't they just going to pull the " freeloader 's debt " thing , and sue him for unpaid auditing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if the defendant is trying to get back pay, then aren't they just going to pull the "freeloader's debt" thing, and sue him for unpaid auditing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289428</id>
	<title>Original complaint</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259664540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For those of you who are interested, you can read the original court complaint filing here:</p><p><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/23175190/Complaint-filed112509" title="scribd.com">http://www.scribd.com/doc/23175190/Complaint-filed112509</a> [scribd.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For those of you who are interested , you can read the original court complaint filing here : http : //www.scribd.com/doc/23175190/Complaint-filed112509 [ scribd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those of you who are interested, you can read the original court complaint filing here:http://www.scribd.com/doc/23175190/Complaint-filed112509 [scribd.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289314</id>
	<title>Re:That's pretty evil.</title>
	<author>PalmKiller</author>
	<datestamp>1259664060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Church of Nibbles and Bits for Compu-fornication maybe?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Church of Nibbles and Bits for Compu-fornication maybe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Church of Nibbles and Bits for Compu-fornication maybe?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30299356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289548
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290910
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30303450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30294608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30338454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30297912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30348240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290862
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291826
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289254
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292692
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292708
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30300416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289362
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289856
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290600
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30296678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30294992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30302198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30294502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30294110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_2045227_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289586
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289732
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290978
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291132
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289492
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290028
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289628
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291714
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291324
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289416
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290232
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290620
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289570
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290518
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289720
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290062
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290910
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290718
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291532
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289364
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289382
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290208
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30296678
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290330
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293954
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291124
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291180
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290434
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289934
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291492
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290862
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289938
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292248
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290880
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290214
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295066
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290812
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30294502
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291826
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30294608
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290348
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292692
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290844
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290946
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293540
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292126
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295440
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289914
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289314
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289498
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289660
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289924
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292630
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293748
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291656
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291962
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293120
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290670
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30294110
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292372
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292456
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293368
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292192
------http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298364
------http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295112
------http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298274
-------http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30348240
-------http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30300416
------http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30338454
------http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295350
-------http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298620
--------http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30299356
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292774
------http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295422
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293790
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290194
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290366
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291770
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289272
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295076
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292462
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291274
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290278
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292976
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30303450
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291724
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291956
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289350
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289626
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30298518
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293558
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289688
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289362
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290914
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290082
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293248
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30293956
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289336
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289704
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295824
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291854
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289868
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290600
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30290058
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289634
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_2045227.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30289740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30292468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30295318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291136
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30302198
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30294992
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30297912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_2045227.30291520
</commentlist>
</conversation>
