<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_01_1743252</id>
	<title>Verizon Changes FiOS AUP, -1, Offtopic</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1259691960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>RasputinAXP writes <i>"Verizon has <a href="https://www.verizon.net/central/vzc.portal?\_nfpb=true&amp;\_pageLabel=vzc\_help\_policies&amp;id=AcceptableUse">changed their FiOS AUP</a> effective yesterday, and added an interesting new clause to their specific examples that we're all familiar with: 'it is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to ... post off-topic information on message boards, chat rooms or social networking sites.' At this point, every FiOS-based Slashdot user is breaking the new AUP."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>RasputinAXP writes " Verizon has changed their FiOS AUP effective yesterday , and added an interesting new clause to their specific examples that we 're all familiar with : 'it is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to ... post off-topic information on message boards , chat rooms or social networking sites .
' At this point , every FiOS-based Slashdot user is breaking the new AUP .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RasputinAXP writes "Verizon has changed their FiOS AUP effective yesterday, and added an interesting new clause to their specific examples that we're all familiar with: 'it is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to ... post off-topic information on message boards, chat rooms or social networking sites.
' At this point, every FiOS-based Slashdot user is breaking the new AUP.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286358</id>
	<title>OMG Im breaking my AUP!!</title>
	<author>Golbez81</author>
	<datestamp>1259695980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm going straight to hell!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going straight to hell !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going straight to hell!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287734</id>
	<title>Re:What is an AUP?</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1259700720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't worry about it. Just slap another shrimp on the barbie, smear it with vegemite, and pull out a big knife.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry about it .
Just slap another shrimp on the barbie , smear it with vegemite , and pull out a big knife .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry about it.
Just slap another shrimp on the barbie, smear it with vegemite, and pull out a big knife.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287130</id>
	<title>Re:Why they may have done so</title>
	<author>Firehed</author>
	<datestamp>1259698500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's none of Verizon's business to enforce usage policies of individual sites. Especially since they don't KNOW the usage policies of individual sites.</p><p>If this is limited to Verizon's own support forums, fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's none of Verizon 's business to enforce usage policies of individual sites .
Especially since they do n't KNOW the usage policies of individual sites.If this is limited to Verizon 's own support forums , fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's none of Verizon's business to enforce usage policies of individual sites.
Especially since they don't KNOW the usage policies of individual sites.If this is limited to Verizon's own support forums, fine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288146</id>
	<title>Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient</title>
	<author>Angst Badger</author>
	<datestamp>1259659140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Because now Veri$on will be able to disconnect anybody for any reason under the pretext of breaking a rule.</p></div><p>...which I'm sure they'll rush to do, because <i>with no customers</i>, they'll cut AUP violations to <i>zero</i>.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The more numerous the laws, the more corrupted the state.</p></div><p>Was that knee-jerk anarchism or knee-jerk libertarianism? It's so hard to tell sometimes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because now Veri $ on will be able to disconnect anybody for any reason under the pretext of breaking a rule....which I 'm sure they 'll rush to do , because with no customers , they 'll cut AUP violations to zero.The more numerous the laws , the more corrupted the state.Was that knee-jerk anarchism or knee-jerk libertarianism ?
It 's so hard to tell sometimes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because now Veri$on will be able to disconnect anybody for any reason under the pretext of breaking a rule....which I'm sure they'll rush to do, because with no customers, they'll cut AUP violations to zero.The more numerous the laws, the more corrupted the state.Was that knee-jerk anarchism or knee-jerk libertarianism?
It's so hard to tell sometimes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287790</id>
	<title>Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259700960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah but the chick that plays Alice had some nudie pix leaked about a month ago...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah but the chick that plays Alice had some nudie pix leaked about a month ago.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah but the chick that plays Alice had some nudie pix leaked about a month ago...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288898</id>
	<title>Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2</title>
	<author>Tetsujin</author>
	<datestamp>1259662080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I thought New Moon was a poorly done movie. The acting was terrible, and the characters themselves, corny. 4/10, would not see again.</p></div><p>Yeah, but Edward has a soul!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought New Moon was a poorly done movie .
The acting was terrible , and the characters themselves , corny .
4/10 , would not see again.Yeah , but Edward has a soul !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought New Moon was a poorly done movie.
The acting was terrible, and the characters themselves, corny.
4/10, would not see again.Yeah, but Edward has a soul!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286422</id>
	<title>This is to be able to cutoff message spammers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259696220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who otherwise have paid up Verizon accounts in good standing.</p><p>They want a legal way to be able to shitcan them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who otherwise have paid up Verizon accounts in good standing.They want a legal way to be able to shitcan them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who otherwise have paid up Verizon accounts in good standing.They want a legal way to be able to shitcan them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287334</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>MindlessAutomata</author>
	<datestamp>1259699220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, the American government isn't even bound by the Constitution in practice, so I've no idea what that document is even for.  And if it is, hell, all you need is the Supreme Court to, like great High Priests or perhaps mystical shamans, decide what <i>really</i> means with a papal infallibility...!  So again, what is the document for?  I submit it is like Britain's royal family--mostly symbolic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , the American government is n't even bound by the Constitution in practice , so I 've no idea what that document is even for .
And if it is , hell , all you need is the Supreme Court to , like great High Priests or perhaps mystical shamans , decide what really means with a papal infallibility... !
So again , what is the document for ?
I submit it is like Britain 's royal family--mostly symbolic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, the American government isn't even bound by the Constitution in practice, so I've no idea what that document is even for.
And if it is, hell, all you need is the Supreme Court to, like great High Priests or perhaps mystical shamans, decide what really means with a papal infallibility...!
So again, what is the document for?
I submit it is like Britain's royal family--mostly symbolic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286446</id>
	<title>Marked Offtopic?</title>
	<author>orthancstone</author>
	<datestamp>1259696280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's with people marking it Offtopic?  He's totally right about [insert President/Cable Company/Microsoft/news site/vi/emacs/etc].  Obviously people on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. are too [insert Conservative/Liberal/nerdy/stupid/n00b].</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's with people marking it Offtopic ?
He 's totally right about [ insert President/Cable Company/Microsoft/news site/vi/emacs/etc ] .
Obviously people on / .
are too [ insert Conservative/Liberal/nerdy/stupid/n00b ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's with people marking it Offtopic?
He's totally right about [insert President/Cable Company/Microsoft/news site/vi/emacs/etc].
Obviously people on /.
are too [insert Conservative/Liberal/nerdy/stupid/n00b].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30291540</id>
	<title>Re:Why they may have done so</title>
	<author>elbowboy</author>
	<datestamp>1259674200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So how does one violate term L when using a service that requires a fiber optic line be installed by Verizon?

"(l) use the Service in Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria or any other E:1 Country as designated by the Department of Commerce."

That has got to be one long network cable....</htmltext>
<tokenext>So how does one violate term L when using a service that requires a fiber optic line be installed by Verizon ?
" ( l ) use the Service in Cuba , Iran , North Korea , Sudan and Syria or any other E : 1 Country as designated by the Department of Commerce .
" That has got to be one long network cable... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how does one violate term L when using a service that requires a fiber optic line be installed by Verizon?
"(l) use the Service in Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria or any other E:1 Country as designated by the Department of Commerce.
"

That has got to be one long network cable....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286884</id>
	<title>Re:Restraint Of Free Speech</title>
	<author>Chris Mattern</author>
	<datestamp>1259697720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It can't, but unfortunately you do not have a constitutional right to use Comcast's equipment to post what you want against their will--even if you're willing to pay for it.  Your constitutional right to free speech is a right not to be censored by government edict.  And that's it.  Who in the world modded this "Insightful"?</p><p>And oh, yeah: When was the last time you had a really, REALLY good bagel?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It ca n't , but unfortunately you do not have a constitutional right to use Comcast 's equipment to post what you want against their will--even if you 're willing to pay for it .
Your constitutional right to free speech is a right not to be censored by government edict .
And that 's it .
Who in the world modded this " Insightful " ? And oh , yeah : When was the last time you had a really , REALLY good bagel ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It can't, but unfortunately you do not have a constitutional right to use Comcast's equipment to post what you want against their will--even if you're willing to pay for it.
Your constitutional right to free speech is a right not to be censored by government edict.
And that's it.
Who in the world modded this "Insightful"?And oh, yeah: When was the last time you had a really, REALLY good bagel?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286812</id>
	<title>Re:Restraint Of Free Speech</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259697480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is more complicated than that. Legal agreements can restrict certain rights that would otherwise be protected. So for example, non-disclosure agreements are legal even though they restrict your speech. However, certain rights cannot be contracted away even by a willing individual. Thus, for example, you can't sell yourself into slavery. IANAL, but these restrictions look like they are within bounds for what can  be included in a contract. Remember, stupidity is not necessarily illegal or unconstitutional.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is more complicated than that .
Legal agreements can restrict certain rights that would otherwise be protected .
So for example , non-disclosure agreements are legal even though they restrict your speech .
However , certain rights can not be contracted away even by a willing individual .
Thus , for example , you ca n't sell yourself into slavery .
IANAL , but these restrictions look like they are within bounds for what can be included in a contract .
Remember , stupidity is not necessarily illegal or unconstitutional .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is more complicated than that.
Legal agreements can restrict certain rights that would otherwise be protected.
So for example, non-disclosure agreements are legal even though they restrict your speech.
However, certain rights cannot be contracted away even by a willing individual.
Thus, for example, you can't sell yourself into slavery.
IANAL, but these restrictions look like they are within bounds for what can  be included in a contract.
Remember, stupidity is not necessarily illegal or unconstitutional.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288912</id>
	<title>Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2</title>
	<author>Looce</author>
	<datestamp>1259662140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thunder bolts of lightning very very frightening me!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thunder bolts of lightning very very frightening me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thunder bolts of lightning very very frightening me!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30293754</id>
	<title>Re:Restraint Of Free Speech</title>
	<author>Eravnrekaree</author>
	<datestamp>1259691060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since it is a common carrier, constitutional rights should apply even though it is private property. Other course cases have shown that protests are protected on private property in privately owned planned communities where the private sidewalk is the functional equivalent of a public sidewalk. I think similar principles apply here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since it is a common carrier , constitutional rights should apply even though it is private property .
Other course cases have shown that protests are protected on private property in privately owned planned communities where the private sidewalk is the functional equivalent of a public sidewalk .
I think similar principles apply here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since it is a common carrier, constitutional rights should apply even though it is private property.
Other course cases have shown that protests are protected on private property in privately owned planned communities where the private sidewalk is the functional equivalent of a public sidewalk.
I think similar principles apply here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287676</id>
	<title>wow</title>
	<author>thehostiles</author>
	<datestamp>1259700480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>give this article an award for most offtopic messages.

also, I just watched that "christian side hug" video...

cool beans</htmltext>
<tokenext>give this article an award for most offtopic messages .
also , I just watched that " christian side hug " video.. . cool beans</tokentext>
<sentencetext>give this article an award for most offtopic messages.
also, I just watched that "christian side hug" video...

cool beans</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30291414</id>
	<title>Email chain letters too?</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1259673420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So i can get people cut off if they forward me useless chain emails? Cool.</p><p>Oh, and bunnies are pink..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So i can get people cut off if they forward me useless chain emails ?
Cool.Oh , and bunnies are pink. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So i can get people cut off if they forward me useless chain emails?
Cool.Oh, and bunnies are pink..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286758</id>
	<title>Re:Part (b) : "flaming"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259697300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know, I like the new clause.

All the sites of the world say "No Flaming, No OffTopic in our forums.". What happens when those rules are broken too much? They ban from the site.

Verizon's just helpin' out. "No Flaming, No OffTopic in anyone's forums." What happens when the AUP is broken? They cut off the Internet connection.

You may not realize it, but Verizon's just trying to make the Internet a place for halfway intelligent people again, instead of whiny 12-year-olds all going "LOL GUYS! I'M USING TEH INTERBUTT!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know , I like the new clause .
All the sites of the world say " No Flaming , No OffTopic in our forums. " .
What happens when those rules are broken too much ?
They ban from the site .
Verizon 's just helpin ' out .
" No Flaming , No OffTopic in anyone 's forums .
" What happens when the AUP is broken ?
They cut off the Internet connection .
You may not realize it , but Verizon 's just trying to make the Internet a place for halfway intelligent people again , instead of whiny 12-year-olds all going " LOL GUYS !
I 'M USING TEH INTERBUTT !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know, I like the new clause.
All the sites of the world say "No Flaming, No OffTopic in our forums.".
What happens when those rules are broken too much?
They ban from the site.
Verizon's just helpin' out.
"No Flaming, No OffTopic in anyone's forums.
" What happens when the AUP is broken?
They cut off the Internet connection.
You may not realize it, but Verizon's just trying to make the Internet a place for halfway intelligent people again, instead of whiny 12-year-olds all going "LOL GUYS!
I'M USING TEH INTERBUTT!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287288</id>
	<title>Re:Riiight, constitution doesn't apply.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259699040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't believe that is a Constitutional matter (not *entirely* positive about that, though).</p><p>My understanding is, the Constitution defines the structure of the Federal government, and places limits on the powers of the Federal and State governments. *Laws* then, based upon the powers granted to the Congress, State Legislatures, and local government bodies, act upon individuals and businesses.</p><p>So, you can't say "no black customers" because Federal Law,  I believe, passed by Congress, signed by the President, has made that illegal, NOT the Constitution. Again, as the GP stated, generally speaking, when discussing what private entities (people, corporations, non-profit foundations, etc) can and cannot do, it's generally not true that the Constitution has anything to say about it.</p><p>Someone might bring up a case like Brown vs. Board of Education, where the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, but, I believe, in that case, the Constitution was applied because what was at issue were public, government funded and run schools.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't believe that is a Constitutional matter ( not * entirely * positive about that , though ) .My understanding is , the Constitution defines the structure of the Federal government , and places limits on the powers of the Federal and State governments .
* Laws * then , based upon the powers granted to the Congress , State Legislatures , and local government bodies , act upon individuals and businesses.So , you ca n't say " no black customers " because Federal Law , I believe , passed by Congress , signed by the President , has made that illegal , NOT the Constitution .
Again , as the GP stated , generally speaking , when discussing what private entities ( people , corporations , non-profit foundations , etc ) can and can not do , it 's generally not true that the Constitution has anything to say about it.Someone might bring up a case like Brown vs. Board of Education , where the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional , but , I believe , in that case , the Constitution was applied because what was at issue were public , government funded and run schools .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't believe that is a Constitutional matter (not *entirely* positive about that, though).My understanding is, the Constitution defines the structure of the Federal government, and places limits on the powers of the Federal and State governments.
*Laws* then, based upon the powers granted to the Congress, State Legislatures, and local government bodies, act upon individuals and businesses.So, you can't say "no black customers" because Federal Law,  I believe, passed by Congress, signed by the President, has made that illegal, NOT the Constitution.
Again, as the GP stated, generally speaking, when discussing what private entities (people, corporations, non-profit foundations, etc) can and cannot do, it's generally not true that the Constitution has anything to say about it.Someone might bring up a case like Brown vs. Board of Education, where the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, but, I believe, in that case, the Constitution was applied because what was at issue were public, government funded and run schools.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288220</id>
	<title>Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient</title>
	<author>corbettw</author>
	<datestamp>1259659440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, because that's what companies want to do, disconnect their customers. That's how they make their money, after all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , because that 's what companies want to do , disconnect their customers .
That 's how they make their money , after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, because that's what companies want to do, disconnect their customers.
That's how they make their money, after all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289220</id>
	<title>better yet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259663700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I prefer "or incites bigotry, hatred or racism;" since no matter what you post, it is sure to incite hatred, bigotry or racism in someone in the world.</p><p>This makes pretty much everything a violation once the right (or wrong) person reads it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer " or incites bigotry , hatred or racism ; " since no matter what you post , it is sure to incite hatred , bigotry or racism in someone in the world.This makes pretty much everything a violation once the right ( or wrong ) person reads it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer "or incites bigotry, hatred or racism;" since no matter what you post, it is sure to incite hatred, bigotry or racism in someone in the world.This makes pretty much everything a violation once the right (or wrong) person reads it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286658</id>
	<title>Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube?</title>
	<author>MalleusEBHC</author>
	<datestamp>1259697060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The star destroyer was neither a star nor a destroyer. Discuss.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The star destroyer was neither a star nor a destroyer .
Discuss .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The star destroyer was neither a star nor a destroyer.
Discuss.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290484</id>
	<title>Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259669100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The star destroyer was neither a star nor a destroyer</p></div><p>I don't think that's a good reason to put another excuse on the TOS notice. The salad has too much lettuce for that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The star destroyer was neither a star nor a destroyerI do n't think that 's a good reason to put another excuse on the TOS notice .
The salad has too much lettuce for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The star destroyer was neither a star nor a destroyerI don't think that's a good reason to put another excuse on the TOS notice.
The salad has too much lettuce for that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290918</id>
	<title>Re:Why they may have done so</title>
	<author>clintonmonk</author>
	<datestamp>1259671020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A+</htmltext>
<tokenext>A +</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A+</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287546</id>
	<title>Verizon Killed My Dog!</title>
	<author>Virtucon</author>
	<datestamp>1259699940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Verizon killed my tree when installing their FIOS lines outside my house.  That caused my dog to go nuts because that's the tree he peed on.  He eventually died of bladder failure.</p><p>Verizon owes me another dog.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Verizon killed my tree when installing their FIOS lines outside my house .
That caused my dog to go nuts because that 's the tree he peed on .
He eventually died of bladder failure.Verizon owes me another dog .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Verizon killed my tree when installing their FIOS lines outside my house.
That caused my dog to go nuts because that's the tree he peed on.
He eventually died of bladder failure.Verizon owes me another dog.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288310</id>
	<title>I'll kill you...</title>
	<author>msantosn</author>
	<datestamp>1259659740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hate everybody...

Maybe I can restore my karma? May I get a refill ? =)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate everybody.. . Maybe I can restore my karma ?
May I get a refill ?
= )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate everybody...

Maybe I can restore my karma?
May I get a refill ?
=)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290480</id>
	<title>Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259669100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought it was more of a planet destroyer, but I guess that doesn't sound as cool...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it was more of a planet destroyer , but I guess that does n't sound as cool.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it was more of a planet destroyer, but I guess that doesn't sound as cool...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288230</id>
	<title>uhhhmm.....</title>
	<author>inerlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1259659440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>thank the gods i use comcast?</htmltext>
<tokenext>thank the gods i use comcast ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thank the gods i use comcast?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286396</id>
	<title>/. broken again?</title>
	<author>postmortem</author>
	<datestamp>1259696160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>hello world, i am responding to fios article.</htmltext>
<tokenext>hello world , i am responding to fios article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hello world, i am responding to fios article.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286920</id>
	<title>Re:Why they may have done so</title>
	<author>pz</author>
	<datestamp>1259697840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This may be overbroad wording in response to spam comments or the like (remember the Christmas store junk that kept getting posted here over the last few weeks?). The wording is broad, but that may very well be to make sure that they can reasonably catch it all and respond.</p><p>Sorry if that's too ontopic. I guess I could help that out by copy and pasting some hot fanfic  but a quick google search doesn't show any Steven Chu/Terry Tao slash.</p></div><p>And it gives them ammunition to terminate essentially anyone's service, at will, since deciding whether a posting is on-topic or off-topic is entirely subjective.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This may be overbroad wording in response to spam comments or the like ( remember the Christmas store junk that kept getting posted here over the last few weeks ? ) .
The wording is broad , but that may very well be to make sure that they can reasonably catch it all and respond.Sorry if that 's too ontopic .
I guess I could help that out by copy and pasting some hot fanfic but a quick google search does n't show any Steven Chu/Terry Tao slash.And it gives them ammunition to terminate essentially anyone 's service , at will , since deciding whether a posting is on-topic or off-topic is entirely subjective .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This may be overbroad wording in response to spam comments or the like (remember the Christmas store junk that kept getting posted here over the last few weeks?).
The wording is broad, but that may very well be to make sure that they can reasonably catch it all and respond.Sorry if that's too ontopic.
I guess I could help that out by copy and pasting some hot fanfic  but a quick google search doesn't show any Steven Chu/Terry Tao slash.And it gives them ammunition to terminate essentially anyone's service, at will, since deciding whether a posting is on-topic or off-topic is entirely subjective.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286416</id>
	<title>Why they may have done so</title>
	<author>JoshuaZ</author>
	<datestamp>1259696220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
This may be overbroad wording in response to spam comments or the like (remember the Christmas store junk that kept getting posted here over the last few weeks?). The wording is broad, but that may very well be to make sure that they can reasonably catch it all and respond.
</p><p>
Sorry if that's too ontopic. I guess I could help that out by copy and pasting some hot fanfic  but a quick google search doesn't show any Steven Chu/Terry Tao slash.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This may be overbroad wording in response to spam comments or the like ( remember the Christmas store junk that kept getting posted here over the last few weeks ? ) .
The wording is broad , but that may very well be to make sure that they can reasonably catch it all and respond .
Sorry if that 's too ontopic .
I guess I could help that out by copy and pasting some hot fanfic but a quick google search does n't show any Steven Chu/Terry Tao slash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
This may be overbroad wording in response to spam comments or the like (remember the Christmas store junk that kept getting posted here over the last few weeks?).
The wording is broad, but that may very well be to make sure that they can reasonably catch it all and respond.
Sorry if that's too ontopic.
I guess I could help that out by copy and pasting some hot fanfic  but a quick google search doesn't show any Steven Chu/Terry Tao slash.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288842</id>
	<title>Re:I'm Not!</title>
	<author>tsstahl</author>
	<datestamp>1259661780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, in my Terms of Use policy I can extend any other entities AUP?  Assume for a second that I skip the obvious like "...reserve the right to fornicate with your hot wife".  How about if I add a small charge like 5 cents, American, for every post you make payable by your ISP.  Lean back and issue bills after six months or so.  Would the ensuing litigation create bad or good case law for consumers?
<br> <br>
While we are playing at annoying rhetorical questions, if two trains leave opposite coasts towards Chicago, which one will beat the Greyhound bus?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , in my Terms of Use policy I can extend any other entities AUP ?
Assume for a second that I skip the obvious like " ...reserve the right to fornicate with your hot wife " .
How about if I add a small charge like 5 cents , American , for every post you make payable by your ISP .
Lean back and issue bills after six months or so .
Would the ensuing litigation create bad or good case law for consumers ?
While we are playing at annoying rhetorical questions , if two trains leave opposite coasts towards Chicago , which one will beat the Greyhound bus ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, in my Terms of Use policy I can extend any other entities AUP?
Assume for a second that I skip the obvious like "...reserve the right to fornicate with your hot wife".
How about if I add a small charge like 5 cents, American, for every post you make payable by your ISP.
Lean back and issue bills after six months or so.
Would the ensuing litigation create bad or good case law for consumers?
While we are playing at annoying rhetorical questions, if two trains leave opposite coasts towards Chicago, which one will beat the Greyhound bus?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288198</id>
	<title>Hey, but I got good new about my Verizon DSL!</title>
	<author>jfruhlinger</author>
	<datestamp>1259659380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They just sent me an update to my DSL terms of service, generously telling me that if I commit to two years of service and within that two years they stop offering DSL service in my neighborhood, I won't be charged an early termination fee!  So, it's a good news/bad news kind of situation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They just sent me an update to my DSL terms of service , generously telling me that if I commit to two years of service and within that two years they stop offering DSL service in my neighborhood , I wo n't be charged an early termination fee !
So , it 's a good news/bad news kind of situation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They just sent me an update to my DSL terms of service, generously telling me that if I commit to two years of service and within that two years they stop offering DSL service in my neighborhood, I won't be charged an early termination fee!
So, it's a good news/bad news kind of situation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286392</id>
	<title>guys this is off topic</title>
	<author>Saryn</author>
	<datestamp>1259696100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's stay on topic. It's in the AUP.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's stay on topic .
It 's in the AUP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's stay on topic.
It's in the AUP.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286842</id>
	<title>AUP</title>
	<author>mugnyte</author>
	<datestamp>1259697540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; Sweet potatoes seem to be the best food ever made.  Any way they are prepared, and my mouth is in love from the first taste.</p><p>
&nbsp; I'm not sure how I feel about Biofeedback Therapy.  It's kinda spooky.</p><p>
&nbsp; When will they upgrade these tired outdated office phones?  Given that so few people use them any more, perhaps we'll just unplug them and never notice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>  Sweet potatoes seem to be the best food ever made .
Any way they are prepared , and my mouth is in love from the first taste .
  I 'm not sure how I feel about Biofeedback Therapy .
It 's kinda spooky .
  When will they upgrade these tired outdated office phones ?
Given that so few people use them any more , perhaps we 'll just unplug them and never notice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
  Sweet potatoes seem to be the best food ever made.
Any way they are prepared, and my mouth is in love from the first taste.
  I'm not sure how I feel about Biofeedback Therapy.
It's kinda spooky.
  When will they upgrade these tired outdated office phones?
Given that so few people use them any more, perhaps we'll just unplug them and never notice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286498</id>
	<title>Re:For all you baseball fans</title>
	<author>oldspewey</author>
	<datestamp>1259696460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I used to watch a lot more baseball than I do now. Of course, back then I lived in a different neighbourhood, and there was a totally awesome Thai place right around the corner that used to make these really good basil rolls.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to watch a lot more baseball than I do now .
Of course , back then I lived in a different neighbourhood , and there was a totally awesome Thai place right around the corner that used to make these really good basil rolls .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to watch a lot more baseball than I do now.
Of course, back then I lived in a different neighbourhood, and there was a totally awesome Thai place right around the corner that used to make these really good basil rolls.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287464</id>
	<title>We're no strangers to love...</title>
	<author>spartacus\_prime</author>
	<datestamp>1259699700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know the rules, and so do I.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know the rules , and so do I .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know the rules, and so do I.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506</id>
	<title>Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)?</title>
	<author>ClayJar</author>
	<datestamp>1259696460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"[I]t is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to[...] (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information"</p><p>They don't even say "unwanted" or some such term.  According to the letter of their AUP, discovering an old friend's email address (or Facebook page... whatever people use these days) and sending the friend a message "may lead to termination of your Service".  They could replace their entire AUP with an at-will statement and it would be no less unconscionable.</p><p>Of course, cutting off anyone who sends yet another "e-card" might actually be justified, and according to AUP 2.b, they could do it.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Obviously, it's not likely they will enforce the AUP in an egregiously Draconian manner, but I for one would prefer having the outlandish bits *implied* rather than expressly stated.  It just looks cleaner.  On the other hand, they didn't quite go completely Pythonesque on us:</p><blockquote><div><p> <strong>Prohibited:</strong><br>1. Users named other than "Thomas".<br>2. Users named "Thomas".</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" [ I ] t is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to [ ... ] ( b ) transmit uninvited communications , data or information " They do n't even say " unwanted " or some such term .
According to the letter of their AUP , discovering an old friend 's email address ( or Facebook page... whatever people use these days ) and sending the friend a message " may lead to termination of your Service " .
They could replace their entire AUP with an at-will statement and it would be no less unconscionable.Of course , cutting off anyone who sends yet another " e-card " might actually be justified , and according to AUP 2.b , they could do it .
: ) Obviously , it 's not likely they will enforce the AUP in an egregiously Draconian manner , but I for one would prefer having the outlandish bits * implied * rather than expressly stated .
It just looks cleaner .
On the other hand , they did n't quite go completely Pythonesque on us : Prohibited : 1 .
Users named other than " Thomas " .2 .
Users named " Thomas " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"[I]t is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to[...] (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information"They don't even say "unwanted" or some such term.
According to the letter of their AUP, discovering an old friend's email address (or Facebook page... whatever people use these days) and sending the friend a message "may lead to termination of your Service".
They could replace their entire AUP with an at-will statement and it would be no less unconscionable.Of course, cutting off anyone who sends yet another "e-card" might actually be justified, and according to AUP 2.b, they could do it.
:)Obviously, it's not likely they will enforce the AUP in an egregiously Draconian manner, but I for one would prefer having the outlandish bits *implied* rather than expressly stated.
It just looks cleaner.
On the other hand, they didn't quite go completely Pythonesque on us: Prohibited:1.
Users named other than "Thomas".2.
Users named "Thomas".
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287680</id>
	<title>Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1259700540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I agree, and I think it's time for the government to acknowledge the problem.</p></div><p>Yeah, but with the two-party system, your only choice is Republicrats, so there's no way to fix the system. What's needed is an armed revolt.</p><p>(Hm... isn't this rather the kind of reply that is widely considered <em>on</em>-topic in <em>any</em><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. thread?)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , and I think it 's time for the government to acknowledge the problem.Yeah , but with the two-party system , your only choice is Republicrats , so there 's no way to fix the system .
What 's needed is an armed revolt. ( Hm.. .
is n't this rather the kind of reply that is widely considered on-topic in any / .
thread ? )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, and I think it's time for the government to acknowledge the problem.Yeah, but with the two-party system, your only choice is Republicrats, so there's no way to fix the system.
What's needed is an armed revolt.(Hm...
isn't this rather the kind of reply that is widely considered on-topic in any /.
thread?)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286220</id>
	<title>My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259695560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it was a cool game. Clever plot, movie-like experience that took your breath away and huge explosions. It was sad that there wasn't more of those sneaky sniper missions however.</p><p>Multiplayer is cool with it's leveling and perks, which actually matter quite a lot. Your characters abilities are totally different based on your perks. Co-op play is also great fun.</p><p>What do you think?</p><p><a href="http://titanically.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/multipass11.jpg" title="wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">funny picture</a> [wordpress.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it was a cool game .
Clever plot , movie-like experience that took your breath away and huge explosions .
It was sad that there was n't more of those sneaky sniper missions however.Multiplayer is cool with it 's leveling and perks , which actually matter quite a lot .
Your characters abilities are totally different based on your perks .
Co-op play is also great fun.What do you think ? funny picture [ wordpress.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it was a cool game.
Clever plot, movie-like experience that took your breath away and huge explosions.
It was sad that there wasn't more of those sneaky sniper missions however.Multiplayer is cool with it's leveling and perks, which actually matter quite a lot.
Your characters abilities are totally different based on your perks.
Co-op play is also great fun.What do you think?funny picture [wordpress.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286866</id>
	<title>Riiight, constitution doesn't apply.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259697660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So they can say "no black customers", right? (No.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>So they can say " no black customers " , right ?
( No. )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So they can say "no black customers", right?
(No.)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287738</id>
	<title>I have a gripe about FiOS...</title>
	<author>melted keyboard</author>
	<datestamp>1259700720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>[Censored by FiOS AUP]</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ Censored by FiOS AUP ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[Censored by FiOS AUP]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30298340</id>
	<title>Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube?</title>
	<author>BranMan</author>
	<datestamp>1259601660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It all depends - is a Star Destroyer actually meant to destroy something?  Consider - the modern Destroyer class is actually a shortened version of the real name, from about WWI timeframe - Torpedo Boat Destroyer.  Torpedo boats were the time's 'super weapon' that would render all larger ships obsolete (like battleships).   What actually happened was they built a new class of fleet escorts to deal with them - fast enough that they couldn't be out-maneuvered by the torpedo boats, with enough firepower to blow them out of the water, and nimble enough to dodge the torpedos themselves.   Problem solved.<br><br>So, back to the question - is there a specific threat the Start Destroyer was meant to protect larger Imperial fleet units from?</htmltext>
<tokenext>It all depends - is a Star Destroyer actually meant to destroy something ?
Consider - the modern Destroyer class is actually a shortened version of the real name , from about WWI timeframe - Torpedo Boat Destroyer .
Torpedo boats were the time 's 'super weapon ' that would render all larger ships obsolete ( like battleships ) .
What actually happened was they built a new class of fleet escorts to deal with them - fast enough that they could n't be out-maneuvered by the torpedo boats , with enough firepower to blow them out of the water , and nimble enough to dodge the torpedos themselves .
Problem solved.So , back to the question - is there a specific threat the Start Destroyer was meant to protect larger Imperial fleet units from ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It all depends - is a Star Destroyer actually meant to destroy something?
Consider - the modern Destroyer class is actually a shortened version of the real name, from about WWI timeframe - Torpedo Boat Destroyer.
Torpedo boats were the time's 'super weapon' that would render all larger ships obsolete (like battleships).
What actually happened was they built a new class of fleet escorts to deal with them - fast enough that they couldn't be out-maneuvered by the torpedo boats, with enough firepower to blow them out of the water, and nimble enough to dodge the torpedos themselves.
Problem solved.So, back to the question - is there a specific threat the Start Destroyer was meant to protect larger Imperial fleet units from?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286852</id>
	<title>Re:Restraint Of Free Speech</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259697600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are correct that some rights are inalienable.</p><p>However, such is not the case in this situation.  For example:</p><p>I may rent my vehicle to you and state that you are ONLY allowed to use this vehicle to drive yourself to the hospital in a medical emergency.  You would not be allowed to drive this vehicle to go vote.</p><p>Or I could sell you a cell phone which only calls 911 or the local police station.</p><p>Simply because I am not permitting you to exercise your right through a service does not automatically imply that I am not permitting you from exercising your right at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are correct that some rights are inalienable.However , such is not the case in this situation .
For example : I may rent my vehicle to you and state that you are ONLY allowed to use this vehicle to drive yourself to the hospital in a medical emergency .
You would not be allowed to drive this vehicle to go vote.Or I could sell you a cell phone which only calls 911 or the local police station.Simply because I am not permitting you to exercise your right through a service does not automatically imply that I am not permitting you from exercising your right at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are correct that some rights are inalienable.However, such is not the case in this situation.
For example:I may rent my vehicle to you and state that you are ONLY allowed to use this vehicle to drive yourself to the hospital in a medical emergency.
You would not be allowed to drive this vehicle to go vote.Or I could sell you a cell phone which only calls 911 or the local police station.Simply because I am not permitting you to exercise your right through a service does not automatically imply that I am not permitting you from exercising your right at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286956</id>
	<title>Re:I'm Not!</title>
	<author>locallyunscene</author>
	<datestamp>1259697960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This just proves once again privatization is better than gov't. See corporations are even better at censorship than governments are. You don't need messy strong men to silence viewpoints, you just need to have absolute power over the dominant medium of the day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This just proves once again privatization is better than gov't .
See corporations are even better at censorship than governments are .
You do n't need messy strong men to silence viewpoints , you just need to have absolute power over the dominant medium of the day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This just proves once again privatization is better than gov't.
See corporations are even better at censorship than governments are.
You don't need messy strong men to silence viewpoints, you just need to have absolute power over the dominant medium of the day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286470</id>
	<title>Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube?</title>
	<author>Joe U</author>
	<datestamp>1259696340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SCUBA is an acronym for Self Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SCUBA is an acronym for Self Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SCUBA is an acronym for Self Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286716</id>
	<title>I want me some</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1259697180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>petrified Natalie Portland with hot grits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>petrified Natalie Portland with hot grits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>petrified Natalie Portland with hot grits.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30297560</id>
	<title>Re:Cows</title>
	<author>Quince alPillan</author>
	<datestamp>1259598000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How in the hell did you get modded off topic?  This is one of the few stories where being off topic is actually on topic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How in the hell did you get modded off topic ?
This is one of the few stories where being off topic is actually on topic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How in the hell did you get modded off topic?
This is one of the few stories where being off topic is actually on topic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287550</id>
	<title>I like to tape my thumbs to my hands</title>
	<author>kindbud</author>
	<datestamp>1259700000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To see what it would be like to be a dinosaur.</p><p>I also like to think of Jesus as a mischievous badger.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To see what it would be like to be a dinosaur.I also like to think of Jesus as a mischievous badger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To see what it would be like to be a dinosaur.I also like to think of Jesus as a mischievous badger.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288420</id>
	<title>Re:OMG Im breaking my AUP!!</title>
	<author>spidercoz</author>
	<datestamp>1259660220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>go directly to hell, do not pass go, do not collect $200</htmltext>
<tokenext>go directly to hell , do not pass go , do not collect $ 200</tokentext>
<sentencetext>go directly to hell, do not pass go, do not collect $200</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286358</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289008</id>
	<title>Re:For all you baseball fans</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259662560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Slashdot doesn't have a special case for posts like this, which should get moderator points <em>added</em> for being offtopic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot does n't have a special case for posts like this , which should get moderator points added for being offtopic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot doesn't have a special case for posts like this, which should get moderator points added for being offtopic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289844</id>
	<title>Praise of fishfood</title>
	<author>Barryke</author>
	<datestamp>1259666220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There was this one fish i saw today on the internet somewhere, it looks like a robotfish, swims like a robotfish, and gulps like a dead fish. A fish that has been dead for a week, not a fresly cought spasm one. Anyway the fish was ugly. I don't like robotfish.

Whats up with the palmtrees in concrete bins anyways? They're like everywhere where they once decided to pave the beach.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There was this one fish i saw today on the internet somewhere , it looks like a robotfish , swims like a robotfish , and gulps like a dead fish .
A fish that has been dead for a week , not a fresly cought spasm one .
Anyway the fish was ugly .
I do n't like robotfish .
Whats up with the palmtrees in concrete bins anyways ?
They 're like everywhere where they once decided to pave the beach .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was this one fish i saw today on the internet somewhere, it looks like a robotfish, swims like a robotfish, and gulps like a dead fish.
A fish that has been dead for a week, not a fresly cought spasm one.
Anyway the fish was ugly.
I don't like robotfish.
Whats up with the palmtrees in concrete bins anyways?
They're like everywhere where they once decided to pave the beach.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289676</id>
	<title>I know it's a parody but...</title>
	<author>nozendo</author>
	<datestamp>1259665560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... responses in this thread look similar to most slashdot posts.</p><p>=P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... responses in this thread look similar to most slashdot posts. = P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... responses in this thread look similar to most slashdot posts.=P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287972</id>
	<title>Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1259658420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is not a criminal matter, not in the least.  Why do people insist on blurring that line?</p><p>Verizon cuts you off and you need to find a new ISP.  If you're unable to do so, you might even have some kind of recourse.</p><p>If law enforcement 'cuts you off', you're in prison and finding an ISP is subsequently less important than keeping track of your bar of soap.  Not to mention that any shot at the life of an ordinary citizen is completely forfeit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not a criminal matter , not in the least .
Why do people insist on blurring that line ? Verizon cuts you off and you need to find a new ISP .
If you 're unable to do so , you might even have some kind of recourse.If law enforcement 'cuts you off ' , you 're in prison and finding an ISP is subsequently less important than keeping track of your bar of soap .
Not to mention that any shot at the life of an ordinary citizen is completely forfeit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not a criminal matter, not in the least.
Why do people insist on blurring that line?Verizon cuts you off and you need to find a new ISP.
If you're unable to do so, you might even have some kind of recourse.If law enforcement 'cuts you off', you're in prison and finding an ISP is subsequently less important than keeping track of your bar of soap.
Not to mention that any shot at the life of an ordinary citizen is completely forfeit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288056</id>
	<title>Re:I'm Not!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259658720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I suspect this is just the next level of ISPs' disallowing spamming. They probably aren't planning to actively enforce it, but if it were to come to their attention that one of their accounts is being used to post 100's of more or less subtle marketing messages a day to forums, they reserve the right to cut the account off.</p> </div><p>""Did you really think that we want those laws to be observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We *want* them broken.""<br>[/tinfoil]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect this is just the next level of ISPs ' disallowing spamming .
They probably are n't planning to actively enforce it , but if it were to come to their attention that one of their accounts is being used to post 100 's of more or less subtle marketing messages a day to forums , they reserve the right to cut the account off .
" " Did you really think that we want those laws to be observed ?
" said Dr. Ferris. " We * want * them broken .
" " [ /tinfoil ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect this is just the next level of ISPs' disallowing spamming.
They probably aren't planning to actively enforce it, but if it were to come to their attention that one of their accounts is being used to post 100's of more or less subtle marketing messages a day to forums, they reserve the right to cut the account off.
""Did you really think that we want those laws to be observed?
" said Dr. Ferris. "We *want* them broken.
""[/tinfoil]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286512</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>Saryn</author>
	<datestamp>1259696520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More trolls should invoke the first amendment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>More trolls should invoke the first amendment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More trolls should invoke the first amendment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287230</id>
	<title>Would it be off topic --</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1259698800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>-- for me to bitch and moan about how Verizon FiOS lines cover all the streets around my apartment complex, but, due to a Verizon f*ck up on the property years ago (which caused a couple thousand in damage to a drain and structures around it) that my apartment complex *will not* allow Verizon on the property to bring the FiOS lines to the various apartment buildings.</p><p>I say, screw them!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>-- for me to bitch and moan about how Verizon FiOS lines cover all the streets around my apartment complex , but , due to a Verizon f * ck up on the property years ago ( which caused a couple thousand in damage to a drain and structures around it ) that my apartment complex * will not * allow Verizon on the property to bring the FiOS lines to the various apartment buildings.I say , screw them !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-- for me to bitch and moan about how Verizon FiOS lines cover all the streets around my apartment complex, but, due to a Verizon f*ck up on the property years ago (which caused a couple thousand in damage to a drain and structures around it) that my apartment complex *will not* allow Verizon on the property to bring the FiOS lines to the various apartment buildings.I say, screw them!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30292614</id>
	<title>Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259680920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nor did it destroy any stars.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nor did it destroy any stars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nor did it destroy any stars.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289546</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>raddan</author>
	<datestamp>1259664960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Verizon licenses public spectrum and has privileges like right-of-way to lay cable.  I don't know the exact repercussions of such things (IANAL), but I suspect that there's some tradeoff there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Verizon licenses public spectrum and has privileges like right-of-way to lay cable .
I do n't know the exact repercussions of such things ( IANAL ) , but I suspect that there 's some tradeoff there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Verizon licenses public spectrum and has privileges like right-of-way to lay cable.
I don't know the exact repercussions of such things (IANAL), but I suspect that there's some tradeoff there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30292850</id>
	<title>Thanks for the warning...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259682780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Below are snippets from an email I got from Verizon today, regarding TOS changes.</p><p>Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:24:43 -0600 (CST)</p><p>Subject: Effective November 30, 2009 - Important Information Regarding a Change<br>
&nbsp; to Your Verizon Online Terms Of Service<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...As set forth in Paragraph 3 of the Terms of Service, your<br>continued use of the Service after the effective date of this change<br>will constitute your agreement to the change.</p><p>Thanks for the warning, Verizon. Can I have a copy of the calender you're using?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Below are snippets from an email I got from Verizon today , regarding TOS changes.Date : Tue , 01 Dec 2009 13 : 24 : 43 -0600 ( CST ) Subject : Effective November 30 , 2009 - Important Information Regarding a Change   to Your Verizon Online Terms Of Service ...As set forth in Paragraph 3 of the Terms of Service , yourcontinued use of the Service after the effective date of this changewill constitute your agreement to the change.Thanks for the warning , Verizon .
Can I have a copy of the calender you 're using ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Below are snippets from an email I got from Verizon today, regarding TOS changes.Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:24:43 -0600 (CST)Subject: Effective November 30, 2009 - Important Information Regarding a Change
  to Your Verizon Online Terms Of Service ...As set forth in Paragraph 3 of the Terms of Service, yourcontinued use of the Service after the effective date of this changewill constitute your agreement to the change.Thanks for the warning, Verizon.
Can I have a copy of the calender you're using?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286522</id>
	<title>Something actually on-topic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259696580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Verizon Usenet may not be accessed via any other network. You may open no more than five simultaneous connections to newsgroups at any one time. We reserve the right in our sole discretion, with or without notice to you, to add or subtract Usenet Newsgroups and to modify or restrict the bandwidth available to download content from our Usenet Newsgroup services, or to suspend or terminate our Usenet Newsgroup services (or portions thereof) at any time, with or without notice.</p></div><p>I don't know how scared I should be that they have clauses in their AUP regarding the Newsgroups. It's the one last bastion of free speech and high bandwidth...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Verizon Usenet may not be accessed via any other network .
You may open no more than five simultaneous connections to newsgroups at any one time .
We reserve the right in our sole discretion , with or without notice to you , to add or subtract Usenet Newsgroups and to modify or restrict the bandwidth available to download content from our Usenet Newsgroup services , or to suspend or terminate our Usenet Newsgroup services ( or portions thereof ) at any time , with or without notice.I do n't know how scared I should be that they have clauses in their AUP regarding the Newsgroups .
It 's the one last bastion of free speech and high bandwidth.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Verizon Usenet may not be accessed via any other network.
You may open no more than five simultaneous connections to newsgroups at any one time.
We reserve the right in our sole discretion, with or without notice to you, to add or subtract Usenet Newsgroups and to modify or restrict the bandwidth available to download content from our Usenet Newsgroup services, or to suspend or terminate our Usenet Newsgroup services (or portions thereof) at any time, with or without notice.I don't know how scared I should be that they have clauses in their AUP regarding the Newsgroups.
It's the one last bastion of free speech and high bandwidth...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30307042</id>
	<title>A Watts</title>
	<author>memnock</author>
	<datestamp>1259597760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>~in order to clear one's mind, think of something with no meaning, like a sound~</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>~ in order to clear one 's mind , think of something with no meaning , like a sound ~</tokentext>
<sentencetext>~in order to clear one's mind, think of something with no meaning, like a sound~</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288142</id>
	<title>Cheese and lemons are good for your bunons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259659080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My cat is a carrot again.  Please release all the birds so the car can run again.  Larry doesn't like onions or battleships on his burger.  YES I CAN HEAR YOU NOW! SHUTTHEHELLUPYOUGOOBER!  First add in the egg whites, then mix in the pine tree.  UNF UNF UNF</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My cat is a carrot again .
Please release all the birds so the car can run again .
Larry does n't like onions or battleships on his burger .
YES I CAN HEAR YOU NOW !
SHUTTHEHELLUPYOUGOOBER ! First add in the egg whites , then mix in the pine tree .
UNF UNF UNF</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My cat is a carrot again.
Please release all the birds so the car can run again.
Larry doesn't like onions or battleships on his burger.
YES I CAN HEAR YOU NOW!
SHUTTHEHELLUPYOUGOOBER!  First add in the egg whites, then mix in the pine tree.
UNF UNF UNF</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290190</id>
	<title>Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)?</title>
	<author>drdrgivemethenews</author>
	<datestamp>1259667720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also prohibited: groups of all groups that don't contain themselves.<br> <br>

&gt; Prohibited:<br>
&gt; 1. Users named other than "Thomas".<br>
&gt; 2. Users named "Thomas".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also prohibited : groups of all groups that do n't contain themselves .
&gt; Prohibited : &gt; 1 .
Users named other than " Thomas " .
&gt; 2 .
Users named " Thomas " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also prohibited: groups of all groups that don't contain themselves.
&gt; Prohibited:
&gt; 1.
Users named other than "Thomas".
&gt; 2.
Users named "Thomas".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286378</id>
	<title>Who gets to decide the topic?</title>
	<author>jeffmeden</author>
	<datestamp>1259696100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not posting off topic, YOU are posting off topic!</p><p>If I were a Verizon FiOS customer I would change my sig to "That may seem off topic but it isn't."  See?  These aren't the droids you are looking for, after all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not posting off topic , YOU are posting off topic ! If I were a Verizon FiOS customer I would change my sig to " That may seem off topic but it is n't .
" See ?
These are n't the droids you are looking for , after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not posting off topic, YOU are posting off topic!If I were a Verizon FiOS customer I would change my sig to "That may seem off topic but it isn't.
"  See?
These aren't the droids you are looking for, after all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287436</id>
	<title>Re:I'm Not!</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1259699640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, if they're reading all the information being sent over the Internet, then clearly Verizon is responsible for allowing distribution of online child porn and any other illegal material. I mean, they wouldn't seek common carrier protection from any responsibility while breaking the rules that common carriers have to follow, would they?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if they 're reading all the information being sent over the Internet , then clearly Verizon is responsible for allowing distribution of online child porn and any other illegal material .
I mean , they would n't seek common carrier protection from any responsibility while breaking the rules that common carriers have to follow , would they ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if they're reading all the information being sent over the Internet, then clearly Verizon is responsible for allowing distribution of online child porn and any other illegal material.
I mean, they wouldn't seek common carrier protection from any responsibility while breaking the rules that common carriers have to follow, would they?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30292964</id>
	<title>Ceiling cat...</title>
	<author>uvajed\_ekil</author>
	<datestamp>1259683740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...watches you masturbate. Senator Larry Craig is jealous of ceiling cat and would like to steal his ceiling modification technology to watch baseball player Grady Sizemore.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...watches you masturbate .
Senator Larry Craig is jealous of ceiling cat and would like to steal his ceiling modification technology to watch baseball player Grady Sizemore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...watches you masturbate.
Senator Larry Craig is jealous of ceiling cat and would like to steal his ceiling modification technology to watch baseball player Grady Sizemore.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287330</id>
	<title>Anime</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259699160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Tentacles. Why do they always bring up the tentacles?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tentacles .
Why do they always bring up the tentacles ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tentacles.
Why do they always bring up the tentacles?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286918</id>
	<title>Err.. no.</title>
	<author>Fished</author>
	<datestamp>1259697840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>IANAL.  I don't even play one on TV.  However, your "constitutional rights" are a list of things that the <b>government</b> may not do to you.  While there might be some legal angle based on Verizon's status as a common carrier, public utility, etc., generally speaking a private company has no obligation to enable your freedom of speech.  Think about it... does a newspaper have to print your letter to the editor?  No.  Same deal here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>IANAL .
I do n't even play one on TV .
However , your " constitutional rights " are a list of things that the government may not do to you .
While there might be some legal angle based on Verizon 's status as a common carrier , public utility , etc. , generally speaking a private company has no obligation to enable your freedom of speech .
Think about it... does a newspaper have to print your letter to the editor ?
No. Same deal here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IANAL.
I don't even play one on TV.
However, your "constitutional rights" are a list of things that the government may not do to you.
While there might be some legal angle based on Verizon's status as a common carrier, public utility, etc., generally speaking a private company has no obligation to enable your freedom of speech.
Think about it... does a newspaper have to print your letter to the editor?
No.  Same deal here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286914</id>
	<title>I have a dream...</title>
	<author>singingjim1</author>
	<datestamp>1259697840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That somehow, someway, we are able to take back our personal freedoms from over-reaching EULAs.  I mean really, my account will be canceled if I post an off topic remark on a friend's Facebook page? Not that I have any friends really, but I blame that on my parents divorce. My mom was really overbearing and I think that not being able to truly express myself for fear of ridicule by my family had a real impact on my social development. But that's a thread for another Web site...what were we talking about again?</htmltext>
<tokenext>That somehow , someway , we are able to take back our personal freedoms from over-reaching EULAs .
I mean really , my account will be canceled if I post an off topic remark on a friend 's Facebook page ?
Not that I have any friends really , but I blame that on my parents divorce .
My mom was really overbearing and I think that not being able to truly express myself for fear of ridicule by my family had a real impact on my social development .
But that 's a thread for another Web site...what were we talking about again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That somehow, someway, we are able to take back our personal freedoms from over-reaching EULAs.
I mean really, my account will be canceled if I post an off topic remark on a friend's Facebook page?
Not that I have any friends really, but I blame that on my parents divorce.
My mom was really overbearing and I think that not being able to truly express myself for fear of ridicule by my family had a real impact on my social development.
But that's a thread for another Web site...what were we talking about again?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388</id>
	<title>Part (b) : "flaming"</title>
	<author>MillionthMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1259696100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>(b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information, or engage in other similar activities, including without limitation, "spamming", "flaming" or denial of service attacks;</p></div><p>
You people at Verizon are a bunch of asswipes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( b ) transmit uninvited communications , data or information , or engage in other similar activities , including without limitation , " spamming " , " flaming " or denial of service attacks ; You people at Verizon are a bunch of asswipes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information, or engage in other similar activities, including without limitation, "spamming", "flaming" or denial of service attacks;
You people at Verizon are a bunch of asswipes.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30291574</id>
	<title>Afghanistan!</title>
	<author>Doug52392</author>
	<datestamp>1259674440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, Obama's going to announce extending the War in Afghanistan. Discuss.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , Obama 's going to announce extending the War in Afghanistan .
Discuss .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, Obama's going to announce extending the War in Afghanistan.
Discuss.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30291400</id>
	<title>Re:Err.. no.</title>
	<author>tomtomtom</author>
	<datestamp>1259673360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IANAL either and while this is all very true, I think there is a good chance that these terms are so broad that they may well fall foul of local "unfair consumer contract terms" type legislation. Not sure what the situation is in the US, but I would be surprised if some of those were held enforceable against consumers in the UK, for example. Not that that would help you a great deal, since your redress would just be to turn around and sue them for what is, in the grand scheme of things, a relatively small monetary amount of damages.</p><p>The only way I can see this might get more legally interesting is if they try to use these terms to act against some kind of "speciallhy protected" speech (e.g. arguing in favour of disabled, women's or minority rights). And even then it's probably more of a political problem for them than a legal one I suspect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IANAL either and while this is all very true , I think there is a good chance that these terms are so broad that they may well fall foul of local " unfair consumer contract terms " type legislation .
Not sure what the situation is in the US , but I would be surprised if some of those were held enforceable against consumers in the UK , for example .
Not that that would help you a great deal , since your redress would just be to turn around and sue them for what is , in the grand scheme of things , a relatively small monetary amount of damages.The only way I can see this might get more legally interesting is if they try to use these terms to act against some kind of " speciallhy protected " speech ( e.g .
arguing in favour of disabled , women 's or minority rights ) .
And even then it 's probably more of a political problem for them than a legal one I suspect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IANAL either and while this is all very true, I think there is a good chance that these terms are so broad that they may well fall foul of local "unfair consumer contract terms" type legislation.
Not sure what the situation is in the US, but I would be surprised if some of those were held enforceable against consumers in the UK, for example.
Not that that would help you a great deal, since your redress would just be to turn around and sue them for what is, in the grand scheme of things, a relatively small monetary amount of damages.The only way I can see this might get more legally interesting is if they try to use these terms to act against some kind of "speciallhy protected" speech (e.g.
arguing in favour of disabled, women's or minority rights).
And even then it's probably more of a political problem for them than a legal one I suspect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30302588</id>
	<title>Unprecedented powers for message boards admins!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259575740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just imagine, you can now ban your users not only from your message board , but from his ISP as well!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:evil:</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just imagine , you can now ban your users not only from your message board , but from his ISP as well !
: evil :</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just imagine, you can now ban your users not only from your message board , but from his ISP as well!
:evil:</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287016</id>
	<title>Re:Part (b) : "flaming"</title>
	<author>Clever7Devil</author>
	<datestamp>1259698200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're doing it wrong. You were supposed to attack their sexuality.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're doing it wrong .
You were supposed to attack their sexuality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're doing it wrong.
You were supposed to attack their sexuality.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287198</id>
	<title>Oopsie</title>
	<author>rindeee</author>
	<datestamp>1259698740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>What Verizon (Comcast, and others) are going to learn the hard way is the liability that comes along with this.  IANAL, but, from experience I understand that if you specifically say something is prohibited, but then do not enforce prohibition of it and someone causes harm to another where it would have been precluded had you enforced the prohibition of said activity, guess who's liable.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>What Verizon ( Comcast , and others ) are going to learn the hard way is the liability that comes along with this .
IANAL , but , from experience I understand that if you specifically say something is prohibited , but then do not enforce prohibition of it and someone causes harm to another where it would have been precluded had you enforced the prohibition of said activity , guess who 's liable .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What Verizon (Comcast, and others) are going to learn the hard way is the liability that comes along with this.
IANAL, but, from experience I understand that if you specifically say something is prohibited, but then do not enforce prohibition of it and someone causes harm to another where it would have been precluded had you enforced the prohibition of said activity, guess who's liable.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289404</id>
	<title>Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient</title>
	<author>irieiam</author>
	<datestamp>1259664480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You went from talking about a company AUP to their AUP being law.  wtf?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You went from talking about a company AUP to their AUP being law .
wtf ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You went from talking about a company AUP to their AUP being law.
wtf?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288688</id>
	<title>I like purple</title>
	<author>neo-mkrey</author>
	<datestamp>1259661180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>{done in the voice of Sean Connery}
Suck it, Verizon.

Suck it long and suck it hard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>{ done in the voice of Sean Connery } Suck it , Verizon .
Suck it long and suck it hard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>{done in the voice of Sean Connery}
Suck it, Verizon.
Suck it long and suck it hard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286476</id>
	<title>Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2</title>
	<author>realisticradical</author>
	<datestamp>1259696400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Scaramouch, Scaramouch, will you do the Fandango?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Scaramouch , Scaramouch , will you do the Fandango ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scaramouch, Scaramouch, will you do the Fandango?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288426</id>
	<title>Why is nothing here modded +5 offtopic?</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1259660220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You see that sort of thing entirely too rarely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You see that sort of thing entirely too rarely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You see that sort of thing entirely too rarely.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287954</id>
	<title>Verizon FIOS has usenet/newsgroup?</title>
	<author>antdude</author>
	<datestamp>1259658360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought Verizon dropped it a while ago. Is it any good? Do they use outsource NSP like Giganews?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought Verizon dropped it a while ago .
Is it any good ?
Do they use outsource NSP like Giganews ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought Verizon dropped it a while ago.
Is it any good?
Do they use outsource NSP like Giganews?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288038</id>
	<title>Confusion Norm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259658660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>As a former Vz Employee at a Fiber Solutions Center, I CAN tell you that except for the fact of plunging into FTTH, Vz corporate usually seems to be<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....  oh, wait, I'm using Verizon.    nevermind  ( -:</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a former Vz Employee at a Fiber Solutions Center , I CAN tell you that except for the fact of plunging into FTTH , Vz corporate usually seems to be .... oh , wait , I 'm using Verizon .
nevermind ( - :</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a former Vz Employee at a Fiber Solutions Center, I CAN tell you that except for the fact of plunging into FTTH, Vz corporate usually seems to be ....  oh, wait, I'm using Verizon.
nevermind  ( -:</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30293450</id>
	<title>Conspiracy</title>
	<author>Cobra Spaz</author>
	<datestamp>1259688720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think that Verizon was paid off by some assholes on Slashdot that who were tired of idiots coming on and rambling about off topic nonsense... so now Slashdot has an even better way to punish Off Topic morons. They have a script that sends all of the users who were flagged as offtopic to a SQL database that Verizon then checks against their database. If there are any matches Verizon punishes them.</p><p>This is Bullshit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that Verizon was paid off by some assholes on Slashdot that who were tired of idiots coming on and rambling about off topic nonsense... so now Slashdot has an even better way to punish Off Topic morons .
They have a script that sends all of the users who were flagged as offtopic to a SQL database that Verizon then checks against their database .
If there are any matches Verizon punishes them.This is Bullshit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that Verizon was paid off by some assholes on Slashdot that who were tired of idiots coming on and rambling about off topic nonsense... so now Slashdot has an even better way to punish Off Topic morons.
They have a script that sends all of the users who were flagged as offtopic to a SQL database that Verizon then checks against their database.
If there are any matches Verizon punishes them.This is Bullshit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286686</id>
	<title>Sieges Even</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259697120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So have you guys heard the music of a group called Sieges Even?  Great progressive rock, and they say they don't make good music anymore these days.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So have you guys heard the music of a group called Sieges Even ?
Great progressive rock , and they say they do n't make good music anymore these days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So have you guys heard the music of a group called Sieges Even?
Great progressive rock, and they say they don't make good music anymore these days.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287818</id>
	<title>Nope -- offtopic is ON TOPIC</title>
	<author>redelm</author>
	<datestamp>1259701020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... and just maybe:  on-topic is off topic ?!?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... and just maybe : on-topic is off topic ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and just maybe:  on-topic is off topic ?!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289982</id>
	<title>Quickly, while you have a chance!</title>
	<author>zorg50</author>
	<datestamp>1259666700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can post whatever the hell you want and still get modded +5 Funny!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can post whatever the hell you want and still get modded + 5 Funny !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can post whatever the hell you want and still get modded +5 Funny!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286672</id>
	<title>Re:I'm Not!</title>
	<author>oldspewey</author>
	<datestamp>1259697060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Awwww<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... look<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... somebody who doesn't think their traffic is already being monitored<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... how cute.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Awwww ... look ... somebody who does n't think their traffic is already being monitored ... how cute .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Awwww ... look ... somebody who doesn't think their traffic is already being monitored ... how cute.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288614</id>
	<title>Red Sox Raising Ticket Price</title>
	<author>jeffyboz</author>
	<datestamp>1259660940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't say anything to Verizon, but it looks like Red Sox tickets are going up (again!!)  I, for one, was a LOT happier when we were heart breaking losers...

Ah, the good old days.  I'm telling you, it was something to see, they would get so close every year, then cut out your heart, dash your brains in, and stomp on your mid-section--but, you could walk right up to the gate and get tickets any time you wanted.  It was awesome, really.  Now, it's a mess--nobody goes there anymore, it's too, too, oh &gt;boo hoo hoo

Did I mention Smelt night?  Never mind, that's when I was a Yankees fan (youthful indiscretion, my church prayed for me and it's behind me now.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't say anything to Verizon , but it looks like Red Sox tickets are going up ( again ! !
) I , for one , was a LOT happier when we were heart breaking losers.. . Ah , the good old days .
I 'm telling you , it was something to see , they would get so close every year , then cut out your heart , dash your brains in , and stomp on your mid-section--but , you could walk right up to the gate and get tickets any time you wanted .
It was awesome , really .
Now , it 's a mess--nobody goes there anymore , it 's too , too , oh &gt; boo hoo hoo Did I mention Smelt night ?
Never mind , that 's when I was a Yankees fan ( youthful indiscretion , my church prayed for me and it 's behind me now .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't say anything to Verizon, but it looks like Red Sox tickets are going up (again!!
)  I, for one, was a LOT happier when we were heart breaking losers...

Ah, the good old days.
I'm telling you, it was something to see, they would get so close every year, then cut out your heart, dash your brains in, and stomp on your mid-section--but, you could walk right up to the gate and get tickets any time you wanted.
It was awesome, really.
Now, it's a mess--nobody goes there anymore, it's too, too, oh &gt;boo hoo hoo

Did I mention Smelt night?
Never mind, that's when I was a Yankees fan (youthful indiscretion, my church prayed for me and it's behind me now.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288436</id>
	<title>Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube?</title>
	<author>1s44c</author>
	<datestamp>1259660280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Discuss.</p></div><p>Banana's, fried with honey.</p><p>Delicious.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Discuss.Banana 's , fried with honey.Delicious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Discuss.Banana's, fried with honey.Delicious.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286930</id>
	<title>Twab Andalucia ferrroouuu!</title>
	<author>YourExperiment</author>
	<datestamp>1259697900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cormorants are often disturbed by instantiated flailing humbled. Flail, flail, with the dying of the crepuscule. "Undoubtedly," Miriale remarked, "for if it were not so, how would anyone surrender their sllllllll?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cormorants are often disturbed by instantiated flailing humbled .
Flail , flail , with the dying of the crepuscule .
" Undoubtedly , " Miriale remarked , " for if it were not so , how would anyone surrender their sllllllll ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cormorants are often disturbed by instantiated flailing humbled.
Flail, flail, with the dying of the crepuscule.
"Undoubtedly," Miriale remarked, "for if it were not so, how would anyone surrender their sllllllll?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30292154</id>
	<title>Mind the gap.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259677860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hear it's amazing when the famous purple stuffed worm in flap-jaw space with the tuning fork does a raw blink on Hari-kiri Rock! I need scissors! 61!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear it 's amazing when the famous purple stuffed worm in flap-jaw space with the tuning fork does a raw blink on Hari-kiri Rock !
I need scissors !
61 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear it's amazing when the famous purple stuffed worm in flap-jaw space with the tuning fork does a raw blink on Hari-kiri Rock!
I need scissors!
61!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286652</id>
	<title>Re:I'm Not!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259697060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously though - how are they going to enforce this without reading the information I'm sending over the net. Shouldn't that be Illegal?</p></div><p>Honestly, they don't care as long as you pay and nobody complains. This is just another case where if they get complaints from someone, they can terminate you for ToS violation. In reality, not much has changed - have you read some of them? There's usually enough insane terms to terminate anyone, any time anyway. This is just adding one more possible excuse to put on the termination notice.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously though - how are they going to enforce this without reading the information I 'm sending over the net .
Should n't that be Illegal ? Honestly , they do n't care as long as you pay and nobody complains .
This is just another case where if they get complaints from someone , they can terminate you for ToS violation .
In reality , not much has changed - have you read some of them ?
There 's usually enough insane terms to terminate anyone , any time anyway .
This is just adding one more possible excuse to put on the termination notice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously though - how are they going to enforce this without reading the information I'm sending over the net.
Shouldn't that be Illegal?Honestly, they don't care as long as you pay and nobody complains.
This is just another case where if they get complaints from someone, they can terminate you for ToS violation.
In reality, not much has changed - have you read some of them?
There's usually enough insane terms to terminate anyone, any time anyway.
This is just adding one more possible excuse to put on the termination notice.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30291270</id>
	<title>Off topic...</title>
	<author>ittybad</author>
	<datestamp>1259672700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know that this is off topic, but ******* Connection Terminated ******</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know that this is off topic , but * * * * * * * Connection Terminated * * * * * *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know that this is off topic, but ******* Connection Terminated ******</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287792</id>
	<title>Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2</title>
	<author>jbezorg</author>
	<datestamp>1259700960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And now, the BoHeman Rhapsody<br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeFH-QoAPCk" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeFH-QoAPCk</a> [youtube.com]

<p>... and there goes all my Karma as I inflict this on slashdot. May the song get stuck in your head as it did in mine.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And now , the BoHeman Rhapsody http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = aeFH-QoAPCk [ youtube.com ] ... and there goes all my Karma as I inflict this on slashdot .
May the song get stuck in your head as it did in mine .
: -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And now, the BoHeman Rhapsody
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeFH-QoAPCk [youtube.com]

... and there goes all my Karma as I inflict this on slashdot.
May the song get stuck in your head as it did in mine.
:-P </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287156</id>
	<title>Re:Part (b) : "flaming"</title>
	<author>Vindicator9000</author>
	<datestamp>1259698620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>fuck you, you product of a failed abortion!  What, were you born with a coathanger sticking out of your head?  Did your mom have any kids that lived other than the ones I stuck her with?<p>
fucking waste of skin asshole.  Die in a fire, you douchebag ignoramus right-wing pinko liberal nazi bag of puke-ridden shit.</p><p>
Now THAT's a proper flame!  COME GET ME, VERIZON!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>fuck you , you product of a failed abortion !
What , were you born with a coathanger sticking out of your head ?
Did your mom have any kids that lived other than the ones I stuck her with ?
fucking waste of skin asshole .
Die in a fire , you douchebag ignoramus right-wing pinko liberal nazi bag of puke-ridden shit .
Now THAT 's a proper flame !
COME GET ME , VERIZON !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fuck you, you product of a failed abortion!
What, were you born with a coathanger sticking out of your head?
Did your mom have any kids that lived other than the ones I stuck her with?
fucking waste of skin asshole.
Die in a fire, you douchebag ignoramus right-wing pinko liberal nazi bag of puke-ridden shit.
Now THAT's a proper flame!
COME GET ME, VERIZON!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287246</id>
	<title>Re:Part (b) : "flaming"</title>
	<author>myvirtualid</author>
	<datestamp>1259698860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>You people at Verizon are a bunch of asswipes.</i>
<p>But dude, that's on-topic.
</p><p>Oh, man. We need to recover this thread, ASAP.
</p><p>I just had a cookie. I like cookies. Especially Farmers Market oatmeal raisin cookies, homemade ginger crinkles, and those butter cookies that only Mom makes right.
</p><p>Do you like cookies?
</p><p>I do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You people at Verizon are a bunch of asswipes .
But dude , that 's on-topic .
Oh , man .
We need to recover this thread , ASAP .
I just had a cookie .
I like cookies .
Especially Farmers Market oatmeal raisin cookies , homemade ginger crinkles , and those butter cookies that only Mom makes right .
Do you like cookies ?
I do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You people at Verizon are a bunch of asswipes.
But dude, that's on-topic.
Oh, man.
We need to recover this thread, ASAP.
I just had a cookie.
I like cookies.
Especially Farmers Market oatmeal raisin cookies, homemade ginger crinkles, and those butter cookies that only Mom makes right.
Do you like cookies?
I do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286434</id>
	<title>lol</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259696220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>do i even need to bring up the constitution here?  free speech anyone?</htmltext>
<tokenext>do i even need to bring up the constitution here ?
free speech anyone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>do i even need to bring up the constitution here?
free speech anyone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286872</id>
	<title>Re:Offtopic?</title>
	<author>lavacano201014</author>
	<datestamp>1259697660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Way I'm seeing it, there is no true off-topic in this particular article.<br><br>

If you discuss Verizon's anti-off-topic-ness, you're on topic, but if you start discussing what kind of cheese you like in your macaroni or something, by being OFF-TOPIC, you're ON-TOPIC. If that makes any sense.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Way I 'm seeing it , there is no true off-topic in this particular article .
If you discuss Verizon 's anti-off-topic-ness , you 're on topic , but if you start discussing what kind of cheese you like in your macaroni or something , by being OFF-TOPIC , you 're ON-TOPIC .
If that makes any sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Way I'm seeing it, there is no true off-topic in this particular article.
If you discuss Verizon's anti-off-topic-ness, you're on topic, but if you start discussing what kind of cheese you like in your macaroni or something, by being OFF-TOPIC, you're ON-TOPIC.
If that makes any sense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287758</id>
	<title>Wait, what?</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1259700780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People read those things?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People read those things ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People read those things?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286626</id>
	<title>Missing the Point!!!!!</title>
	<author>ogar572</author>
	<datestamp>1259696940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The point is not if Cpt Caveman can make a good burger using moose meat, its whether or not Modern Warfare 2 should be made to be played on my nieces Elmo learning computer while listening to Oingo Boingo.  I wish everyone would take time and truly understand what the article is talking about.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The point is not if Cpt Caveman can make a good burger using moose meat , its whether or not Modern Warfare 2 should be made to be played on my nieces Elmo learning computer while listening to Oingo Boingo .
I wish everyone would take time and truly understand what the article is talking about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The point is not if Cpt Caveman can make a good burger using moose meat, its whether or not Modern Warfare 2 should be made to be played on my nieces Elmo learning computer while listening to Oingo Boingo.
I wish everyone would take time and truly understand what the article is talking about.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288656</id>
	<title>Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube?</title>
	<author>b4dc0d3r</author>
	<datestamp>1259661060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Off topic - what does your mom have to do with this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Off topic - what does your mom have to do with this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Off topic - what does your mom have to do with this?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287580</id>
	<title>Re:Err.. no.</title>
	<author>Nyall</author>
	<datestamp>1259700060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>generally speaking a private company has no obligation to enable your freedom of speech.</p></div></blockquote><p>I'll agree with that statement in general, but this situation is a company going out of their way to disable your freedom of speech.</p><p>Also I wonder if this is "materially adverse" enough for someone to get out of a contract without early termination fees.</p><p>p.s.  I detest bananas.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>generally speaking a private company has no obligation to enable your freedom of speech.I 'll agree with that statement in general , but this situation is a company going out of their way to disable your freedom of speech.Also I wonder if this is " materially adverse " enough for someone to get out of a contract without early termination fees.p.s .
I detest bananas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>generally speaking a private company has no obligation to enable your freedom of speech.I'll agree with that statement in general, but this situation is a company going out of their way to disable your freedom of speech.Also I wonder if this is "materially adverse" enough for someone to get out of a contract without early termination fees.p.s.
I detest bananas.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286590</id>
	<title>Summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259696880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Instead of exhorting everyone to post something off-topic (like someone wouldn't have done it on their own), the summary should have mentioned that this amendment was probably the service's way of disowning trolls, and making it easier to take away their service if someone complains to the telco.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of exhorting everyone to post something off-topic ( like someone would n't have done it on their own ) , the summary should have mentioned that this amendment was probably the service 's way of disowning trolls , and making it easier to take away their service if someone complains to the telco .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of exhorting everyone to post something off-topic (like someone wouldn't have done it on their own), the summary should have mentioned that this amendment was probably the service's way of disowning trolls, and making it easier to take away their service if someone complains to the telco.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286636</id>
	<title>The internet police are here</title>
	<author>MrEricSir</author>
	<datestamp>1259697000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Watch out, the Verizon Internet Police will put a stop to your trolling efforts!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Watch out , the Verizon Internet Police will put a stop to your trolling efforts !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watch out, the Verizon Internet Police will put a stop to your trolling efforts!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287060</id>
	<title>Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2</title>
	<author>Afforess</author>
	<datestamp>1259698320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought New Moon was a poorly done movie. The acting was terrible, and the characters themselves, corny. 4/10, would not see again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought New Moon was a poorly done movie .
The acting was terrible , and the characters themselves , corny .
4/10 , would not see again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought New Moon was a poorly done movie.
The acting was terrible, and the characters themselves, corny.
4/10, would not see again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286350</id>
	<title>For all you baseball fans</title>
	<author>sconeu</author>
	<datestamp>1259695980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Red Sox, the Yankees, the Phillies and the Angels are interested in Roy Halladay.</p><p>Anyone have any other baseball related news?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Red Sox , the Yankees , the Phillies and the Angels are interested in Roy Halladay.Anyone have any other baseball related news ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Red Sox, the Yankees, the Phillies and the Angels are interested in Roy Halladay.Anyone have any other baseball related news?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287510</id>
	<title>Contact Verizon and let them know you disapprove</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259699880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Send e-mail to volhelp@verizon.net</p><p>I sent them this:</p><p>Dear Verizon,<br>Your Policy here:</p><p>https://www.verizon.net/central/vzc.portal?\_nfpb=true&amp;\_pageLabel=vzc\_help\_policies&amp;id=AcceptableUse</p><p>Contains the clause:</p><p>"The following are examples of conduct which may lead to termination of your Service. Without limiting the general policy in Section 1, it is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... (e) post off-topic information on message boards, chat rooms or social networking sites;"</p><p>Due to the addition of this clause, I can no longer recommend Verizon services, and I have decided not to become a customer of Verizon until this clause is removed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Send e-mail to volhelp @ verizon.netI sent them this : Dear Verizon,Your Policy here : https : //www.verizon.net/central/vzc.portal ? \ _nfpb = true&amp; \ _pageLabel = vzc \ _help \ _policies&amp;id = AcceptableUseContains the clause : " The following are examples of conduct which may lead to termination of your Service .
Without limiting the general policy in Section 1 , it is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to : ... ( e ) post off-topic information on message boards , chat rooms or social networking sites ; " Due to the addition of this clause , I can no longer recommend Verizon services , and I have decided not to become a customer of Verizon until this clause is removed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Send e-mail to volhelp@verizon.netI sent them this:Dear Verizon,Your Policy here:https://www.verizon.net/central/vzc.portal?\_nfpb=true&amp;\_pageLabel=vzc\_help\_policies&amp;id=AcceptableUseContains the clause:"The following are examples of conduct which may lead to termination of your Service.
Without limiting the general policy in Section 1, it is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to: ... (e) post off-topic information on message boards, chat rooms or social networking sites;"Due to the addition of this clause, I can no longer recommend Verizon services, and I have decided not to become a customer of Verizon until this clause is removed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287590</id>
	<title>The Last Starfighter rulz</title>
	<author>Virtucon</author>
	<datestamp>1259700120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's all about The Last Starfighter, old trailer parks and and aliens that look like lizards.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's all about The Last Starfighter , old trailer parks and and aliens that look like lizards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's all about The Last Starfighter, old trailer parks and and aliens that look like lizards.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286610</id>
	<title>When trolling is outlawed, outlaws will troll</title>
	<author>Gothmolly</author>
	<datestamp>1259696880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Classic case of the "open container" law (here in USia) - it gives Verizon an ace in the hole, if they ever need to cut your service for (say) "overuse" - they can sniff your traffic or get an "anonymous" person to complain, and whack your account.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Classic case of the " open container " law ( here in USia ) - it gives Verizon an ace in the hole , if they ever need to cut your service for ( say ) " overuse " - they can sniff your traffic or get an " anonymous " person to complain , and whack your account .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Classic case of the "open container" law (here in USia) - it gives Verizon an ace in the hole, if they ever need to cut your service for (say) "overuse" - they can sniff your traffic or get an "anonymous" person to complain, and whack your account.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288890</id>
	<title>The rule is even goofier than this.</title>
	<author>DavidTC</author>
	<datestamp>1259662020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's one thing to say if you break a forums <b>rules</b> by posting offtopic stuff you'll get disconnected. I don't agree with that, but ISPs have long been doing stuff like that.</p><p>
You start acting in violation of the terms of a site, and that site complains to the ISP, they have two choices: Disconnect you, or hope that site doesn't entirely block them. So they reserve the right to disconnect you, although they usually only do it for big stuff. (I.e., if a user keeps committing click fraud at Google, and they really don't want Google to just block all their IPs)</p><p>
<b>However</b>, this just asserts they can disconnect you from offtopic stuff <b>even when that's not a violation</b> of anyone's terms of service.</p><p>
For example, I just went and read slashdot's terms of service, and I see absolutely nothing in there about offtopic posting. There is not the <b>slightest</b> rule on this site that posts be even vaguely relevant to the article at hand, or that replies to posts be even vaguely relevant to what they responded to.</p><p>
Which means Verizon is taking a step well past the 'self-protection' we let them get away with, and asserting <b>it</b> is in charge of when it can disconnect people, even if the site they're on has no problem with their behavior.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's one thing to say if you break a forums rules by posting offtopic stuff you 'll get disconnected .
I do n't agree with that , but ISPs have long been doing stuff like that .
You start acting in violation of the terms of a site , and that site complains to the ISP , they have two choices : Disconnect you , or hope that site does n't entirely block them .
So they reserve the right to disconnect you , although they usually only do it for big stuff .
( I.e. , if a user keeps committing click fraud at Google , and they really do n't want Google to just block all their IPs ) However , this just asserts they can disconnect you from offtopic stuff even when that 's not a violation of anyone 's terms of service .
For example , I just went and read slashdot 's terms of service , and I see absolutely nothing in there about offtopic posting .
There is not the slightest rule on this site that posts be even vaguely relevant to the article at hand , or that replies to posts be even vaguely relevant to what they responded to .
Which means Verizon is taking a step well past the 'self-protection ' we let them get away with , and asserting it is in charge of when it can disconnect people , even if the site they 're on has no problem with their behavior .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's one thing to say if you break a forums rules by posting offtopic stuff you'll get disconnected.
I don't agree with that, but ISPs have long been doing stuff like that.
You start acting in violation of the terms of a site, and that site complains to the ISP, they have two choices: Disconnect you, or hope that site doesn't entirely block them.
So they reserve the right to disconnect you, although they usually only do it for big stuff.
(I.e., if a user keeps committing click fraud at Google, and they really don't want Google to just block all their IPs)
However, this just asserts they can disconnect you from offtopic stuff even when that's not a violation of anyone's terms of service.
For example, I just went and read slashdot's terms of service, and I see absolutely nothing in there about offtopic posting.
There is not the slightest rule on this site that posts be even vaguely relevant to the article at hand, or that replies to posts be even vaguely relevant to what they responded to.
Which means Verizon is taking a step well past the 'self-protection' we let them get away with, and asserting it is in charge of when it can disconnect people, even if the site they're on has no problem with their behavior.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286568</id>
	<title>Offtopic?</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1259696760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I don't post an off-topic post to this article, am I off-topic?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I do n't post an off-topic post to this article , am I off-topic ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I don't post an off-topic post to this article, am I off-topic?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286360</id>
	<title>I don't use v</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259695980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And that is why I refuse to use Verizon.  Besides, comcast cable internet is faster anways...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And that is why I refuse to use Verizon .
Besides , comcast cable internet is faster anways.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And that is why I refuse to use Verizon.
Besides, comcast cable internet is faster anways...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288312</id>
	<title>Re:Err.. no.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259659740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You could have just said IANALIDEPOOTV and saved me a bunch of time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You could have just said IANALIDEPOOTV and saved me a bunch of time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could have just said IANALIDEPOOTV and saved me a bunch of time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287118</id>
	<title>Did you hear about</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That thing the other night? O CRAP bbzzzt...</p><p>NO CARRIER</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That thing the other night ?
O CRAP bbzzzt...NO CARRIER</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That thing the other night?
O CRAP bbzzzt...NO CARRIER</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287364</id>
	<title>:-D</title>
	<author>owyn999</author>
	<datestamp>1259699340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Come join my new social network at www.verizon.net/aupsucks/socialnetworking/<br><br>------------------<br><br>couldn't help m'self</htmltext>
<tokenext>Come join my new social network at www.verizon.net/aupsucks/socialnetworking/------------------could n't help m'self</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come join my new social network at www.verizon.net/aupsucks/socialnetworking/------------------couldn't help m'self</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287788</id>
	<title>so i'm sitting here wondering</title>
	<author>weirdcrashingnoises</author>
	<datestamp>1259700960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what exactly is a "rick roll?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what exactly is a " rick roll ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what exactly is a "rick roll?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287456</id>
	<title>Hate to break it to ya....</title>
	<author>kaizendojo</author>
	<datestamp>1259699640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>but that wasn't the "change"; in fact that clause has been there for a while.  The only change on 11/30 was<blockquote><div><p>"If you are on a term plan and Verizon ceases offering service to your location prior to the end of your term commitment, you will not have to pay an Early Termination Fee."</p></div></blockquote><p>
Sorry to piss on your misplaced outrage, but there's no story here - nor is it censorship.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but that was n't the " change " ; in fact that clause has been there for a while .
The only change on 11/30 was " If you are on a term plan and Verizon ceases offering service to your location prior to the end of your term commitment , you will not have to pay an Early Termination Fee .
" Sorry to piss on your misplaced outrage , but there 's no story here - nor is it censorship .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but that wasn't the "change"; in fact that clause has been there for a while.
The only change on 11/30 was"If you are on a term plan and Verizon ceases offering service to your location prior to the end of your term commitment, you will not have to pay an Early Termination Fee.
"
Sorry to piss on your misplaced outrage, but there's no story here - nor is it censorship.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286418</id>
	<title>Copyright Infringement/Repeat Infringer Policy.</title>
	<author>whitedsepdivine</author>
	<datestamp>1259696220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>you may not store any material or use Verizon's systems or servers in any manner that constitutes an infringement of third party intellectual property rights, including under US copyright law.</p></div><p>Storing items protected by the DMCA is not against the law.  Copying illegally DRM protected items is.  I think they got that one confused.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>you may not store any material or use Verizon 's systems or servers in any manner that constitutes an infringement of third party intellectual property rights , including under US copyright law.Storing items protected by the DMCA is not against the law .
Copying illegally DRM protected items is .
I think they got that one confused .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you may not store any material or use Verizon's systems or servers in any manner that constitutes an infringement of third party intellectual property rights, including under US copyright law.Storing items protected by the DMCA is not against the law.
Copying illegally DRM protected items is.
I think they got that one confused.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286384</id>
	<title>Cows</title>
	<author>InsaneMosquito</author>
	<datestamp>1259696100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone seen any cows recently? I always love when they go 'Moo'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone seen any cows recently ?
I always love when they go 'Moo' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone seen any cows recently?
I always love when they go 'Moo'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286314</id>
	<title>Definition of Off Topic?</title>
	<author>Futurepower(R)</author>
	<datestamp>1259695860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Everything I don't want to talk about is Off Topic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everything I do n't want to talk about is Off Topic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everything I don't want to talk about is Off Topic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288106</id>
	<title>Re:Riiight, constitution doesn't apply.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259658960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They can't, but not because of the Constitution. Federal laws passed prevent corporations from discriminating on the basis of race. The Constitution couldn't care less, and in fact proscribes for black people to be considered only 3/5ths equivalent to white.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They ca n't , but not because of the Constitution .
Federal laws passed prevent corporations from discriminating on the basis of race .
The Constitution could n't care less , and in fact proscribes for black people to be considered only 3/5ths equivalent to white .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can't, but not because of the Constitution.
Federal laws passed prevent corporations from discriminating on the basis of race.
The Constitution couldn't care less, and in fact proscribes for black people to be considered only 3/5ths equivalent to white.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30292890</id>
	<title>Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259683080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, being able to terminate customers at will is a good thing from a service provider's PoV. At least when you are interested in operations.</p><p>Unfortunately, it doesn't really work that way once you get all the marketing people involved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , being able to terminate customers at will is a good thing from a service provider 's PoV .
At least when you are interested in operations.Unfortunately , it does n't really work that way once you get all the marketing people involved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, being able to terminate customers at will is a good thing from a service provider's PoV.
At least when you are interested in operations.Unfortunately, it doesn't really work that way once you get all the marketing people involved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289090</id>
	<title>Just sit right back</title>
	<author>flahwho</author>
	<datestamp>1259662920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Gilligan Likes Maryann's Coconuts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gilligan Likes Maryann 's Coconuts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gilligan Likes Maryann's Coconuts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286844</id>
	<title>Anti-jerk rule</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259697600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a catch-all that will only get enforced when they need to boot someone who's really breaking a lot of etiquette rules but they haven't actually broke a law.  It's a pretty common form of "anti-jerk rule", sorta like a school that can't fail you for attending, but they can fail you for not participating, and you can't participate if you're not there...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a catch-all that will only get enforced when they need to boot someone who 's really breaking a lot of etiquette rules but they have n't actually broke a law .
It 's a pretty common form of " anti-jerk rule " , sorta like a school that ca n't fail you for attending , but they can fail you for not participating , and you ca n't participate if you 're not there.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a catch-all that will only get enforced when they need to boot someone who's really breaking a lot of etiquette rules but they haven't actually broke a law.
It's a pretty common form of "anti-jerk rule", sorta like a school that can't fail you for attending, but they can fail you for not participating, and you can't participate if you're not there...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30293602</id>
	<title>Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259689860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The star destroyer was neither a star nor a destroyer.</p></div></blockquote><p>Wasn't a destroyer? A destroyer is a type of ship, I think it's defined as having big guns for destroying other ships, that fits "star destroyer" for me ("star ship [Sails in space], ship destroyer")</p><p>I have no idea why I wrote this, I'm not even really in to Star Wars.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The star destroyer was neither a star nor a destroyer.Was n't a destroyer ?
A destroyer is a type of ship , I think it 's defined as having big guns for destroying other ships , that fits " star destroyer " for me ( " star ship [ Sails in space ] , ship destroyer " ) I have no idea why I wrote this , I 'm not even really in to Star Wars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The star destroyer was neither a star nor a destroyer.Wasn't a destroyer?
A destroyer is a type of ship, I think it's defined as having big guns for destroying other ships, that fits "star destroyer" for me ("star ship [Sails in space], ship destroyer")I have no idea why I wrote this, I'm not even really in to Star Wars.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290080</id>
	<title>Re:haha that's funny</title>
	<author>TheEmpyrean</author>
	<datestamp>1259667120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey Fido, look out for that tru&amp;$*&amp;#^--#<br> <br>

[NO TERRIER]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey Fido , look out for that tru&amp; $ * &amp; # ^ -- # [ NO TERRIER ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey Fido, look out for that tru&amp;$*&amp;#^--# 

[NO TERRIER]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286854</id>
	<title>Normal Slashdot Troll Spam</title>
	<author>Neil Hodges</author>
	<datestamp>1259697600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hopefully the most of the normal <a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=470426&amp;no\_d2=1&amp;cid=22593338" title="slashdot.org">troll</a> [slashdot.org] <a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=470426&amp;no\_d2=1&amp;cid=22593640" title="slashdot.org">spam</a> [slashdot.org] by bots on Slashdot are on FiOS.</p><p>Say, why aren't the posting here?</p><p>I couldn't find any more examples, but would like more here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully the most of the normal troll [ slashdot.org ] spam [ slashdot.org ] by bots on Slashdot are on FiOS.Say , why are n't the posting here ? I could n't find any more examples , but would like more here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully the most of the normal troll [slashdot.org] spam [slashdot.org] by bots on Slashdot are on FiOS.Say, why aren't the posting here?I couldn't find any more examples, but would like more here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30294016</id>
	<title>Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259693160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yet it did destroy things, if not stars. The Sun Crusher did the actual star destruction.</p><p>Also, due to its use in the opening scene, the "Star Destroyer" was a minor star of the film.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet it did destroy things , if not stars .
The Sun Crusher did the actual star destruction.Also , due to its use in the opening scene , the " Star Destroyer " was a minor star of the film .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet it did destroy things, if not stars.
The Sun Crusher did the actual star destruction.Also, due to its use in the opening scene, the "Star Destroyer" was a minor star of the film.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289650</id>
	<title>Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)?</title>
	<author>http</author>
	<datestamp>1259665440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How is this obvious?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this obvious ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this obvious?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286968</id>
	<title>Chickens</title>
	<author>jag7720</author>
	<datestamp>1259698020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did you see those chickens?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you see those chickens ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you see those chickens?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286618</id>
	<title>What is an AUP?</title>
	<author>Cur8or</author>
	<datestamp>1259696940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can someone please google AUP and tell me what it is?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can someone please google AUP and tell me what it is ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can someone please google AUP and tell me what it is?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287974</id>
	<title>All I have to say is:</title>
	<author>Facegarden</author>
	<datestamp>1259658420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OHN, by the grace of God King of England, Lord of Ireland, Duke of Normandy and Aquitaine, and Count of Anjou, to his archbishops, bishops, abbots, earls, barons, justices, foresters, sheriffs, stewards, servants, and to all his officials and loyal subjects, Greeting.</p><p>KNOW THAT BEFORE GOD, for the health of our soul and those of our ancestors and heirs, to the honour of God, the exaltation of the holy Church, and the better ordering of our kingdom, at the advice of our reverend fathers Stephen, archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England, and cardinal of the holy Roman Church, Henry archbishop of Dublin, William bishop of London, Peter bishop of Winchester, Jocelin bishop of Bath and Glastonbury, Hugh bishop of Lincoln, Walter Bishop of Worcester, William bishop of Coventry, Benedict bishop of Rochester, Master Pandulf subdeacon and member of the papal household, Brother Aymeric master of the knighthood of the Temple in England, William Marshal earl of Pembroke, William earl of Salisbury, William earl of Warren, William earl of Arundel, Alan de Galloway constable of Scotland, Warin Fitz Gerald, Peter Fitz Herbert, Hubert de Burgh seneschal of Poitou, Hugh de Neville, Matthew Fitz Herbert, Thomas Basset, Alan Basset, Philip Daubeny, Robert de Roppeley, John Marshal, John Fitz Hugh, and other loyal subjects:</p><p>+ (1) FIRST, THAT WE HAVE GRANTED TO GOD, and by this present charter have confirmed for us and our heirs in perpetuity, that the English Church shall be free, and shall have its rights undiminished, and its liberties unimpaired. That we wish this so to be observed, appears from the fact that of our own free will, before the outbreak of the present dispute between us and our barons, we granted and confirmed by charter the freedom of the Church's elections - a right reckoned to be of the greatest necessity and importance to it - and caused this to be confirmed by Pope Innocent III. This freedom we shall observe ourselves, and desire to be observed in good faith by our heirs in perpetuity.</p><p>
 TO ALL FREE MEN OF OUR KINGDOM we have also granted, for us and our heirs for ever, all the liberties written out below, to have and to keep for them and their heirs, of us and our heirs:</p><p>(2) If any earl, baron, or other person that holds lands directly of the Crown, for military service, shall die, and at his death his heir shall be of full age and owe a `relief', the heir shall have his inheritance on payment of the ancient scale of `relief'. That is to say, the heir or heirs of an earl shall pay &pound;100 for the entire earl's barony, the heir or heirs of a knight l00s. at most for the entire knight's `fee', and any man that owes less shall pay less, in accordance with the ancient usage of `fees'</p><p>(3) But if the heir of such a person is under age and a ward, when he comes of age he shall have his inheritance without `relief' or fine.</p><p>(4) The guardian of the land of an heir who is under age shall take from it only reasonable revenues, customary dues, and feudal services. He shall do this without destruction or damage to men or property. If we have given the guardianship of the land to a sheriff, or to any person answerable to us for the revenues, and he commits destruction or damage, we will exact compensation from him, and the land shall be entrusted to two worthy and prudent men of the same `fee', who shall be answerable to us for the revenues, or to the person to whom we have assigned them. If we have given or sold to anyone the guardianship of such land, and he causes destruction or damage, he shall lose the guardianship of it, and it shall be handed over to two worthy and prudent men of the same `fee', who shall be similarly answerable to us.</p><p>(5) For so long as a guardian has guardianship of such land, he shall maintain the houses, parks, fish preserves, ponds, mills, and everything else pertaining to it, from the revenues of the land itself. When the heir comes of age, he shall restore the whole land to him, stocked with plough teams and such implements of husbandry as t</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OHN , by the grace of God King of England , Lord of Ireland , Duke of Normandy and Aquitaine , and Count of Anjou , to his archbishops , bishops , abbots , earls , barons , justices , foresters , sheriffs , stewards , servants , and to all his officials and loyal subjects , Greeting.KNOW THAT BEFORE GOD , for the health of our soul and those of our ancestors and heirs , to the honour of God , the exaltation of the holy Church , and the better ordering of our kingdom , at the advice of our reverend fathers Stephen , archbishop of Canterbury , primate of all England , and cardinal of the holy Roman Church , Henry archbishop of Dublin , William bishop of London , Peter bishop of Winchester , Jocelin bishop of Bath and Glastonbury , Hugh bishop of Lincoln , Walter Bishop of Worcester , William bishop of Coventry , Benedict bishop of Rochester , Master Pandulf subdeacon and member of the papal household , Brother Aymeric master of the knighthood of the Temple in England , William Marshal earl of Pembroke , William earl of Salisbury , William earl of Warren , William earl of Arundel , Alan de Galloway constable of Scotland , Warin Fitz Gerald , Peter Fitz Herbert , Hubert de Burgh seneschal of Poitou , Hugh de Neville , Matthew Fitz Herbert , Thomas Basset , Alan Basset , Philip Daubeny , Robert de Roppeley , John Marshal , John Fitz Hugh , and other loyal subjects : + ( 1 ) FIRST , THAT WE HAVE GRANTED TO GOD , and by this present charter have confirmed for us and our heirs in perpetuity , that the English Church shall be free , and shall have its rights undiminished , and its liberties unimpaired .
That we wish this so to be observed , appears from the fact that of our own free will , before the outbreak of the present dispute between us and our barons , we granted and confirmed by charter the freedom of the Church 's elections - a right reckoned to be of the greatest necessity and importance to it - and caused this to be confirmed by Pope Innocent III .
This freedom we shall observe ourselves , and desire to be observed in good faith by our heirs in perpetuity .
TO ALL FREE MEN OF OUR KINGDOM we have also granted , for us and our heirs for ever , all the liberties written out below , to have and to keep for them and their heirs , of us and our heirs : ( 2 ) If any earl , baron , or other person that holds lands directly of the Crown , for military service , shall die , and at his death his heir shall be of full age and owe a ` relief ' , the heir shall have his inheritance on payment of the ancient scale of ` relief' .
That is to say , the heir or heirs of an earl shall pay   100 for the entire earl 's barony , the heir or heirs of a knight l00s .
at most for the entire knight 's ` fee ' , and any man that owes less shall pay less , in accordance with the ancient usage of ` fees ' ( 3 ) But if the heir of such a person is under age and a ward , when he comes of age he shall have his inheritance without ` relief ' or fine .
( 4 ) The guardian of the land of an heir who is under age shall take from it only reasonable revenues , customary dues , and feudal services .
He shall do this without destruction or damage to men or property .
If we have given the guardianship of the land to a sheriff , or to any person answerable to us for the revenues , and he commits destruction or damage , we will exact compensation from him , and the land shall be entrusted to two worthy and prudent men of the same ` fee ' , who shall be answerable to us for the revenues , or to the person to whom we have assigned them .
If we have given or sold to anyone the guardianship of such land , and he causes destruction or damage , he shall lose the guardianship of it , and it shall be handed over to two worthy and prudent men of the same ` fee ' , who shall be similarly answerable to us .
( 5 ) For so long as a guardian has guardianship of such land , he shall maintain the houses , parks , fish preserves , ponds , mills , and everything else pertaining to it , from the revenues of the land itself .
When the heir comes of age , he shall restore the whole land to him , stocked with plough teams and such implements of husbandry as t</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OHN, by the grace of God King of England, Lord of Ireland, Duke of Normandy and Aquitaine, and Count of Anjou, to his archbishops, bishops, abbots, earls, barons, justices, foresters, sheriffs, stewards, servants, and to all his officials and loyal subjects, Greeting.KNOW THAT BEFORE GOD, for the health of our soul and those of our ancestors and heirs, to the honour of God, the exaltation of the holy Church, and the better ordering of our kingdom, at the advice of our reverend fathers Stephen, archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England, and cardinal of the holy Roman Church, Henry archbishop of Dublin, William bishop of London, Peter bishop of Winchester, Jocelin bishop of Bath and Glastonbury, Hugh bishop of Lincoln, Walter Bishop of Worcester, William bishop of Coventry, Benedict bishop of Rochester, Master Pandulf subdeacon and member of the papal household, Brother Aymeric master of the knighthood of the Temple in England, William Marshal earl of Pembroke, William earl of Salisbury, William earl of Warren, William earl of Arundel, Alan de Galloway constable of Scotland, Warin Fitz Gerald, Peter Fitz Herbert, Hubert de Burgh seneschal of Poitou, Hugh de Neville, Matthew Fitz Herbert, Thomas Basset, Alan Basset, Philip Daubeny, Robert de Roppeley, John Marshal, John Fitz Hugh, and other loyal subjects:+ (1) FIRST, THAT WE HAVE GRANTED TO GOD, and by this present charter have confirmed for us and our heirs in perpetuity, that the English Church shall be free, and shall have its rights undiminished, and its liberties unimpaired.
That we wish this so to be observed, appears from the fact that of our own free will, before the outbreak of the present dispute between us and our barons, we granted and confirmed by charter the freedom of the Church's elections - a right reckoned to be of the greatest necessity and importance to it - and caused this to be confirmed by Pope Innocent III.
This freedom we shall observe ourselves, and desire to be observed in good faith by our heirs in perpetuity.
TO ALL FREE MEN OF OUR KINGDOM we have also granted, for us and our heirs for ever, all the liberties written out below, to have and to keep for them and their heirs, of us and our heirs:(2) If any earl, baron, or other person that holds lands directly of the Crown, for military service, shall die, and at his death his heir shall be of full age and owe a `relief', the heir shall have his inheritance on payment of the ancient scale of `relief'.
That is to say, the heir or heirs of an earl shall pay £100 for the entire earl's barony, the heir or heirs of a knight l00s.
at most for the entire knight's `fee', and any man that owes less shall pay less, in accordance with the ancient usage of `fees'(3) But if the heir of such a person is under age and a ward, when he comes of age he shall have his inheritance without `relief' or fine.
(4) The guardian of the land of an heir who is under age shall take from it only reasonable revenues, customary dues, and feudal services.
He shall do this without destruction or damage to men or property.
If we have given the guardianship of the land to a sheriff, or to any person answerable to us for the revenues, and he commits destruction or damage, we will exact compensation from him, and the land shall be entrusted to two worthy and prudent men of the same `fee', who shall be answerable to us for the revenues, or to the person to whom we have assigned them.
If we have given or sold to anyone the guardianship of such land, and he causes destruction or damage, he shall lose the guardianship of it, and it shall be handed over to two worthy and prudent men of the same `fee', who shall be similarly answerable to us.
(5) For so long as a guardian has guardianship of such land, he shall maintain the houses, parks, fish preserves, ponds, mills, and everything else pertaining to it, from the revenues of the land itself.
When the heir comes of age, he shall restore the whole land to him, stocked with plough teams and such implements of husbandry as t</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287222</id>
	<title>Re:Riiight, constitution doesn't apply.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Constitution only prevents that in government actions.  What prevents private discrimination of recognized classes is primarily the Civil Rights Acts of 1964.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Constitution only prevents that in government actions .
What prevents private discrimination of recognized classes is primarily the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Constitution only prevents that in government actions.
What prevents private discrimination of recognized classes is primarily the Civil Rights Acts of 1964.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286728</id>
	<title>I love sailing</title>
	<author>pavera</author>
	<datestamp>1259697240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sailing is a really great sport and you guys should all try it!  Speaking of which, anyone have a 1990 or newer Hobie Cat 16 for sale?  Preferably in the western US?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sailing is a really great sport and you guys should all try it !
Speaking of which , anyone have a 1990 or newer Hobie Cat 16 for sale ?
Preferably in the western US ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sailing is a really great sport and you guys should all try it!
Speaking of which, anyone have a 1990 or newer Hobie Cat 16 for sale?
Preferably in the western US?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289208</id>
	<title>Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)?</title>
	<author>Tibia1</author>
	<datestamp>1259663640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sorry. Your post was uninvited and deemed a violation.<br>
Guards.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry .
Your post was uninvited and deemed a violation .
Guards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry.
Your post was uninvited and deemed a violation.
Guards.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30295060</id>
	<title>Cut the crap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259576220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm checkin' out:</p><p>"(i) generate excessive amounts of email or other Internet traffic"</p><p>Without a definition of "excessive" it kinda' leaves the barn door wiiiiiiiiiiiide open..</p><p>Why don't they just cut the crap and say:</p><p>"We can cut you off any time we like - for no good goddamn reason at all."</p><p>That would save it's users hours of reading the fine print AUP</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm checkin ' out : " ( i ) generate excessive amounts of email or other Internet traffic " Without a definition of " excessive " it kinda ' leaves the barn door wiiiiiiiiiiiide open..Why do n't they just cut the crap and say : " We can cut you off any time we like - for no good goddamn reason at all .
" That would save it 's users hours of reading the fine print AUP</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm checkin' out:"(i) generate excessive amounts of email or other Internet traffic"Without a definition of "excessive" it kinda' leaves the barn door wiiiiiiiiiiiide open..Why don't they just cut the crap and say:"We can cut you off any time we like - for no good goddamn reason at all.
"That would save it's users hours of reading the fine print AUP</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290182</id>
	<title>Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259667660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7M-7LkvcVw</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = j7M-7LkvcVw</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7M-7LkvcVw</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288794</id>
	<title>Verizon also changed their FiOS ToS today</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1259661660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>1. If you are on a term plan and Verizon ceases offering service to
your location prior to the end of your term commitment, you will not
have to pay an Early Termination Fee.
 </i> <br> <br>
My only response was, "Well, duh! They really have to tell you this?" Think maybe they were having a bit of a problem collecting those Early Termination Fees from people they cut off against their will?</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
If you are on a term plan and Verizon ceases offering service to your location prior to the end of your term commitment , you will not have to pay an Early Termination Fee .
My only response was , " Well , duh !
They really have to tell you this ?
" Think maybe they were having a bit of a problem collecting those Early Termination Fees from people they cut off against their will ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
If you are on a term plan and Verizon ceases offering service to
your location prior to the end of your term commitment, you will not
have to pay an Early Termination Fee.
My only response was, "Well, duh!
They really have to tell you this?
" Think maybe they were having a bit of a problem collecting those Early Termination Fees from people they cut off against their will?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286356</id>
	<title>OUTRAGED</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259695980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a FIOS user, this is total BS.<br>On an unrelated note...<br>[NO CARRIER]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a FIOS user , this is total BS.On an unrelated note... [ NO CARRIER ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a FIOS user, this is total BS.On an unrelated note...[NO CARRIER]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287322</id>
	<title>Re:I'm Not!</title>
	<author>omnichad</author>
	<datestamp>1259699160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well there's plenty of AUP's that already block SPAM.  Why didn't they just say "even subtle spam is still considered spam."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well there 's plenty of AUP 's that already block SPAM .
Why did n't they just say " even subtle spam is still considered spam .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well there's plenty of AUP's that already block SPAM.
Why didn't they just say "even subtle spam is still considered spam.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288298</id>
	<title>You do what think?</title>
	<author>Montezumaa</author>
	<datestamp>1259659740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286950</id>
	<title>I'm not using Verizon, so I can be an ass!</title>
	<author>LikwidCirkel</author>
	<datestamp>1259697960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not bound by their rules.  Without their guidance and enforced good morals, I'm going to harm all of you by calling you douches to hurt your feelings.  Hopefully, the massive amount of hurt feelings from this post will cause a ripple effect across the continent, resulting in the biggest Internet flamewar of our era.  We should all be thanking Verizon for taking a stand against assholes like me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not bound by their rules .
Without their guidance and enforced good morals , I 'm going to harm all of you by calling you douches to hurt your feelings .
Hopefully , the massive amount of hurt feelings from this post will cause a ripple effect across the continent , resulting in the biggest Internet flamewar of our era .
We should all be thanking Verizon for taking a stand against assholes like me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not bound by their rules.
Without their guidance and enforced good morals, I'm going to harm all of you by calling you douches to hurt your feelings.
Hopefully, the massive amount of hurt feelings from this post will cause a ripple effect across the continent, resulting in the biggest Internet flamewar of our era.
We should all be thanking Verizon for taking a stand against assholes like me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286524</id>
	<title>This is why I run Emacs on MacOS</title>
	<author>wiredog</author>
	<datestamp>1259696580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because being a Linux fanboy was too mainstream.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because being a Linux fanboy was too mainstream .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because being a Linux fanboy was too mainstream.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30294188</id>
	<title>Depends on what they mean...</title>
	<author>seebs</author>
	<datestamp>1259695020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But 99\% of usenet spam is offtopic posting...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But 99 \ % of usenet spam is offtopic posting.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But 99\% of usenet spam is offtopic posting...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287894</id>
	<title>This is perfectly acceptable</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259658180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry slashdotters.  You don't have any rights to tell a company what they can and can't do with their network for the most part.</p><p>Their network is private, even if the public has the ability to use it.  They can terminate you for any reason they'd like to, even if they don't like your race, sex, or religion.</p><p>They aren't even a monopoly in most of their service areas.  They may be the only company that offers the type of service they offer but you can get phone, internet, and tv from someone else in every case.  All of it can be handled by someone else using satellites.  It may cost a lot more.  It may not have the channels you want.  It may not be as fast or up to your quality standards, but you CAN go elsewhere.</p><p>The basic complaint here is 'omg they are stating clearly that they may turn me off for doing something they don't like' rather than just leaving it to the default 'we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone.'  Likewise, you certainly have the right to not use them.</p><p>The really sad thing that rather than a logical discussion about this, we have a bunch of people acting like angst ridden teenagers showing Verizon how cool they are by 'intentionally' posting stuff that would normally be deemed 'off topic'.  The funny part about it is, its on topic to this discussion so you've utterly failed at that if you've bothered to go out of your way to be cool and post something off topic.</p><p>If this is the most you have to bitch about then you really don't have anything to bitch about, you're just being a whiney bitch and not doing anything useful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry slashdotters .
You do n't have any rights to tell a company what they can and ca n't do with their network for the most part.Their network is private , even if the public has the ability to use it .
They can terminate you for any reason they 'd like to , even if they do n't like your race , sex , or religion.They are n't even a monopoly in most of their service areas .
They may be the only company that offers the type of service they offer but you can get phone , internet , and tv from someone else in every case .
All of it can be handled by someone else using satellites .
It may cost a lot more .
It may not have the channels you want .
It may not be as fast or up to your quality standards , but you CAN go elsewhere.The basic complaint here is 'omg they are stating clearly that they may turn me off for doing something they do n't like ' rather than just leaving it to the default 'we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone .
' Likewise , you certainly have the right to not use them.The really sad thing that rather than a logical discussion about this , we have a bunch of people acting like angst ridden teenagers showing Verizon how cool they are by 'intentionally ' posting stuff that would normally be deemed 'off topic' .
The funny part about it is , its on topic to this discussion so you 've utterly failed at that if you 've bothered to go out of your way to be cool and post something off topic.If this is the most you have to bitch about then you really do n't have anything to bitch about , you 're just being a whiney bitch and not doing anything useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry slashdotters.
You don't have any rights to tell a company what they can and can't do with their network for the most part.Their network is private, even if the public has the ability to use it.
They can terminate you for any reason they'd like to, even if they don't like your race, sex, or religion.They aren't even a monopoly in most of their service areas.
They may be the only company that offers the type of service they offer but you can get phone, internet, and tv from someone else in every case.
All of it can be handled by someone else using satellites.
It may cost a lot more.
It may not have the channels you want.
It may not be as fast or up to your quality standards, but you CAN go elsewhere.The basic complaint here is 'omg they are stating clearly that they may turn me off for doing something they don't like' rather than just leaving it to the default 'we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone.
'  Likewise, you certainly have the right to not use them.The really sad thing that rather than a logical discussion about this, we have a bunch of people acting like angst ridden teenagers showing Verizon how cool they are by 'intentionally' posting stuff that would normally be deemed 'off topic'.
The funny part about it is, its on topic to this discussion so you've utterly failed at that if you've bothered to go out of your way to be cool and post something off topic.If this is the most you have to bitch about then you really don't have anything to bitch about, you're just being a whiney bitch and not doing anything useful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287902</id>
	<title>Re:Riiight, constitution doesn't apply.</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1259658180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So they can say "no black customers", right? (No.)</p></div><p>Unless they decide they are a private club, rather than a public entity.  Then 'Yes'.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil\_Rights\_Act\_of\_1964" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil\_Rights\_Act\_of\_1964</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So they can say " no black customers " , right ?
( No. ) Unless they decide they are a private club , rather than a public entity .
Then 'Yes'.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil \ _Rights \ _Act \ _of \ _1964 [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So they can say "no black customers", right?
(No.)Unless they decide they are a private club, rather than a public entity.
Then 'Yes'.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil\_Rights\_Act\_of\_1964 [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287438</id>
	<title>Re:Definitely can be used to censor.</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1259699640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet you use Windows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet you use Windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet you use Windows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287848</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259701140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe when it comes to private pipes being the only way in to the public internet (since they SHOOT DOWN every attempt at muni access), then hell yes the Constitution should apply. If it doesn't, then stay out of the way when I push for muni wifi access to the internet so that I CAN have a First and Fourth Amendment protected pipe.</p><p>Corporate assholes can't (or rather <i>shouldn't</i>) have it both ways. One or the other.</p><p>And since I'm posting from a FiOS connection, let me give you my off-topic:<br>I like boobies. Please ask your mom to show me hers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe when it comes to private pipes being the only way in to the public internet ( since they SHOOT DOWN every attempt at muni access ) , then hell yes the Constitution should apply .
If it does n't , then stay out of the way when I push for muni wifi access to the internet so that I CAN have a First and Fourth Amendment protected pipe.Corporate assholes ca n't ( or rather should n't ) have it both ways .
One or the other.And since I 'm posting from a FiOS connection , let me give you my off-topic : I like boobies .
Please ask your mom to show me hers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe when it comes to private pipes being the only way in to the public internet (since they SHOOT DOWN every attempt at muni access), then hell yes the Constitution should apply.
If it doesn't, then stay out of the way when I push for muni wifi access to the internet so that I CAN have a First and Fourth Amendment protected pipe.Corporate assholes can't (or rather shouldn't) have it both ways.
One or the other.And since I'm posting from a FiOS connection, let me give you my off-topic:I like boobies.
Please ask your mom to show me hers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30293358</id>
	<title>all your base are belong to us</title>
	<author>vaporland</author>
	<datestamp>1259687760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and terms and conditions too...</htmltext>
<tokenext>and terms and conditions too.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and terms and conditions too...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288734</id>
	<title>Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2</title>
	<author>TheKidWho</author>
	<datestamp>1259661420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Excuse me, but Moon was a great movie!  The best Science fiction movie of 2009 by far.</p><p>Oh wait, you meant Twilight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Excuse me , but Moon was a great movie !
The best Science fiction movie of 2009 by far.Oh wait , you meant Twilight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Excuse me, but Moon was a great movie!
The best Science fiction movie of 2009 by far.Oh wait, you meant Twilight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286906</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1259697840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Constitution doesn't apply to Verizon. Its a private entity*.
</p><p>What might apply are the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safe\_harbor#Commerce" title="wikipedia.org">Safe Harbor</a> [wikipedia.org] provisions of the DMCA. If Verizon exercises editorial control over their customers' traffic, they might lose that, exposing them to the liability of their customers' actions. Think 'Deep Pockets'.
</p><p>* Why corporations are exempt from provisions of the Constitution is a good question. As they are creations of the State, what rights do the States (or Feds) have to create entities that are not bound by the laws they themselves are bound by? But that's a subject for another discussion and being off-topic here, I run the risk of \%^^^@@^^^@&amp;&amp;   [NO CARRIER]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Constitution does n't apply to Verizon .
Its a private entity * .
What might apply are the Safe Harbor [ wikipedia.org ] provisions of the DMCA .
If Verizon exercises editorial control over their customers ' traffic , they might lose that , exposing them to the liability of their customers ' actions .
Think 'Deep Pockets' .
* Why corporations are exempt from provisions of the Constitution is a good question .
As they are creations of the State , what rights do the States ( or Feds ) have to create entities that are not bound by the laws they themselves are bound by ?
But that 's a subject for another discussion and being off-topic here , I run the risk of \ % ^ ^ ^ @ @ ^ ^ ^ @ &amp;&amp; [ NO CARRIER ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Constitution doesn't apply to Verizon.
Its a private entity*.
What might apply are the Safe Harbor [wikipedia.org] provisions of the DMCA.
If Verizon exercises editorial control over their customers' traffic, they might lose that, exposing them to the liability of their customers' actions.
Think 'Deep Pockets'.
* Why corporations are exempt from provisions of the Constitution is a good question.
As they are creations of the State, what rights do the States (or Feds) have to create entities that are not bound by the laws they themselves are bound by?
But that's a subject for another discussion and being off-topic here, I run the risk of \%^^^@@^^^@&amp;&amp;   [NO CARRIER]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286720</id>
	<title>So, how about those Saints?</title>
	<author>bfwebster</author>
	<datestamp>1259697180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kicked New England's butt, they did.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..bruce..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kicked New England 's butt , they did .
..bruce. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kicked New England's butt, they did.
..bruce..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286824</id>
	<title>Verizon differs from Comcast ... how?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259697540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I could have put up with Comcast when it assimilated my local cable franchise.  I could have put up with it when it shifted out half a dozen channels on the excuse of they would still be available 'in digital' (for extra $$).  But when it was decreed that the Sci-Fi Network would be the Syfy Channel -- well, that made me decide to give up Comcast for a honking big antenna.</p><p>No, Verizon does not serve my area.  Not that it makes a difference.  Given its AUP, I still would have gone with DSL and an aerial.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I could have put up with Comcast when it assimilated my local cable franchise .
I could have put up with it when it shifted out half a dozen channels on the excuse of they would still be available 'in digital ' ( for extra $ $ ) .
But when it was decreed that the Sci-Fi Network would be the Syfy Channel -- well , that made me decide to give up Comcast for a honking big antenna.No , Verizon does not serve my area .
Not that it makes a difference .
Given its AUP , I still would have gone with DSL and an aerial .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could have put up with Comcast when it assimilated my local cable franchise.
I could have put up with it when it shifted out half a dozen channels on the excuse of they would still be available 'in digital' (for extra $$).
But when it was decreed that the Sci-Fi Network would be the Syfy Channel -- well, that made me decide to give up Comcast for a honking big antenna.No, Verizon does not serve my area.
Not that it makes a difference.
Given its AUP, I still would have gone with DSL and an aerial.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288462</id>
	<title>Re:For all you baseball fans</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259660340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Red Sox's newest solution to their shortstop dilemma is to move Pedroia over to short and go find a new second baseman instead. He can't be worse than Lugo, I guess.</p><p>Don't think either the Sox or Yankees will trade for Halladay. Too expensive in players. Sox are supposedly interested in John Lackey instead, if they want a pitcher.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Red Sox 's newest solution to their shortstop dilemma is to move Pedroia over to short and go find a new second baseman instead .
He ca n't be worse than Lugo , I guess.Do n't think either the Sox or Yankees will trade for Halladay .
Too expensive in players .
Sox are supposedly interested in John Lackey instead , if they want a pitcher .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Red Sox's newest solution to their shortstop dilemma is to move Pedroia over to short and go find a new second baseman instead.
He can't be worse than Lugo, I guess.Don't think either the Sox or Yankees will trade for Halladay.
Too expensive in players.
Sox are supposedly interested in John Lackey instead, if they want a pitcher.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288328</id>
	<title>Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259659860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It wasn't funny with Micro$oft, it's not funny with any other company.</p><p>And at least spell it right, like V&euro;rizon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was n't funny with Micro $ oft , it 's not funny with any other company.And at least spell it right , like V    rizon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wasn't funny with Micro$oft, it's not funny with any other company.And at least spell it right, like V€rizon</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286468</id>
	<title>President Obama to send more troops</title>
	<author>runestar</author>
	<datestamp>1259696340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So tonight President Obama is going to announce he's sending more troops into Verizon to help quell the fears that this company is too large to fail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So tonight President Obama is going to announce he 's sending more troops into Verizon to help quell the fears that this company is too large to fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So tonight President Obama is going to announce he's sending more troops into Verizon to help quell the fears that this company is too large to fail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30293250</id>
	<title>Ah...it takes me back to the bad old days...</title>
	<author>meowhous</author>
	<datestamp>1259686500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reminds me of the specs we used to get from Verizon.  If we got anything resembling specs (e.g., things typed in or printed on paper).
<p>
Anybody remember the MS License Agreement that required you not use Word to criticize MS?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of the specs we used to get from Verizon .
If we got anything resembling specs ( e.g. , things typed in or printed on paper ) .
Anybody remember the MS License Agreement that required you not use Word to criticize MS ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of the specs we used to get from Verizon.
If we got anything resembling specs (e.g., things typed in or printed on paper).
Anybody remember the MS License Agreement that required you not use Word to criticize MS?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30293174</id>
	<title>Re:Part (b) : "flaming"</title>
	<author>Ruvim</author>
	<datestamp>1259685840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I like eating at the mall. Food a t "Flamers" sucks though!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like eating at the mall .
Food a t " Flamers " sucks though !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like eating at the mall.
Food a t "Flamers" sucks though!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286744</id>
	<title>FiOS AUP</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259697300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What the hell is a FiOS AUP, and what are the examples that we're all familiar with?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What the hell is a FiOS AUP , and what are the examples that we 're all familiar with ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the hell is a FiOS AUP, and what are the examples that we're all familiar with?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287276</id>
	<title>Re:Part (b) : "flaming"</title>
	<author>MindlessAutomata</author>
	<datestamp>1259699040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>(b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information, or engage in other similar activities,</p></div></blockquote><p>This reminds me how silly and broad these ToSes are.  That appears to even making pinging against the ToS.  What is an "uninvited communication" when it comes to the internet?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( b ) transmit uninvited communications , data or information , or engage in other similar activities,This reminds me how silly and broad these ToSes are .
That appears to even making pinging against the ToS .
What is an " uninvited communication " when it comes to the internet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information, or engage in other similar activities,This reminds me how silly and broad these ToSes are.
That appears to even making pinging against the ToS.
What is an "uninvited communication" when it comes to the internet?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286454</id>
	<title>Getting back on-topic...</title>
	<author>dsavi</author>
	<datestamp>1259696280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I found another interesting part of the same document:<blockquote><div><p>(h) engage in any conduct harmful to the Verizon network, the Internet generally or other Internet users;</p></div></blockquote><p>
Wouldn't that rule out a whole lot of ISPs and governments?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I found another interesting part of the same document : ( h ) engage in any conduct harmful to the Verizon network , the Internet generally or other Internet users ; Would n't that rule out a whole lot of ISPs and governments ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I found another interesting part of the same document:(h) engage in any conduct harmful to the Verizon network, the Internet generally or other Internet users;
Wouldn't that rule out a whole lot of ISPs and governments?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30293198</id>
	<title>Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259685960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"[I]t is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to[...] (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information"</p></div><p>Ok, so it's against AUP to initiate any outbound connections. Gotcha.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" [ I ] t is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to [ ... ] ( b ) transmit uninvited communications , data or information " Ok , so it 's against AUP to initiate any outbound connections .
Gotcha .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"[I]t is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to[...] (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information"Ok, so it's against AUP to initiate any outbound connections.
Gotcha.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288618</id>
	<title>Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient</title>
	<author>ikefox</author>
	<datestamp>1259660940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The more numerous the laws, the more corrupted the state.</p></div><p>That's only partially correct. The more numerous the laws, the more <i>potential</i> for the abuse of power. A written law does not imply the level of enforcement for itself. Corruption results from improper delegation of power and intransparency of government. Of course, examples of these can be found in the cases of almost every major government in history.</p><p>More laws are the means of corruption, not the cause.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The more numerous the laws , the more corrupted the state.That 's only partially correct .
The more numerous the laws , the more potential for the abuse of power .
A written law does not imply the level of enforcement for itself .
Corruption results from improper delegation of power and intransparency of government .
Of course , examples of these can be found in the cases of almost every major government in history.More laws are the means of corruption , not the cause .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The more numerous the laws, the more corrupted the state.That's only partially correct.
The more numerous the laws, the more potential for the abuse of power.
A written law does not imply the level of enforcement for itself.
Corruption results from improper delegation of power and intransparency of government.
Of course, examples of these can be found in the cases of almost every major government in history.More laws are the means of corruption, not the cause.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287028</id>
	<title>Definitely can be used to censor.</title>
	<author>MindlessAutomata</author>
	<datestamp>1259698200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In my experience online, particularly with internet forums featuring heavy political debate (or more accurately put, "argumentation"), rules like "no off-topic posting" can easily be twisted or broadened to accompany the biases of the moderators or the majority opinion to stifle dissent.</p><p>How?  For example, someone who has a completely opposite opinion of the majority may often have a completely opposing ideology and thus their opposition may be seen as "trolling."  I'll use examples from the supposed "both sides" (yes, this is a gross simplification of political ideologies but bear with me), i.e., the left and the right on the political spectrum.  It is frequently seen as off-topic trolling to the left when they are discussing what the proper amount of taxation should be and a libertarian or conservative come in railing against ALL taxation on principle, since the tone of discussion itself was not the validity of taxation but "just the right" amount.  Of course, to many libertarians and conservatives, there is no "right amount," but it's seen as disruption and trolling all the same.</p><p>Similarly for the right, when the left criticize religiously-based policies it is often seen as rambling on about un-American stuff, and since they are talking about AMERICA! they really ought go someplace else (usually Cuba) to discuss that sort of thing.  And then they're banned.</p><p>I've seen the same thing with "don't be rude" rules.  Tell someone that a particular belief they have is racist, and on some forums you will get punished for insulting, nevermind the fact that some wackjobs people out there proudly call themselves racists (and if you intend to have free, open discussion, you'll have to remain neutral to both sides and favor neither) and nevermind the fact that by some definitions their views can be considered racist.  For example (trying to remain unbiased towards "both" sides of the fence here, again), you can sometimes be punished for claiming that someone is a racist for affirmative action, or can be punished for saying that someone is racist for supporting Israel's status as an officially Jewish state.  Of course, just being contradictory enough times, particularly towards deeply-established social norms and views is seen as disruptive and can also get you kicked from forums for "being a jerk."</p><p>This is similar to how the media marginalizes minority viewpoints in politics, by not televising them, referring to them as "spoilers" as if the votes really belong to the Big Two, treating them as sideshow attractions, and generally holding them in contempt--this applies to the Libertarians AND the left-wing parties such as the Green Party.</p><p>Conformity rules everywhere, even in places that supposedly pride themselves on having open discussion and unbiased moderation.  Consensus will eventually appear and if a voice is <i>too</i> contradictory they'll be seen not as a contributing member but as a disruptive element.  The only solution I can see for truly  "free" discussion online (and I am not implying that all forums should have "free" discussion, simply ones that aim to) is to require members to have a bit of backbone and a lot of leeway on what is appropriate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In my experience online , particularly with internet forums featuring heavy political debate ( or more accurately put , " argumentation " ) , rules like " no off-topic posting " can easily be twisted or broadened to accompany the biases of the moderators or the majority opinion to stifle dissent.How ?
For example , someone who has a completely opposite opinion of the majority may often have a completely opposing ideology and thus their opposition may be seen as " trolling .
" I 'll use examples from the supposed " both sides " ( yes , this is a gross simplification of political ideologies but bear with me ) , i.e. , the left and the right on the political spectrum .
It is frequently seen as off-topic trolling to the left when they are discussing what the proper amount of taxation should be and a libertarian or conservative come in railing against ALL taxation on principle , since the tone of discussion itself was not the validity of taxation but " just the right " amount .
Of course , to many libertarians and conservatives , there is no " right amount , " but it 's seen as disruption and trolling all the same.Similarly for the right , when the left criticize religiously-based policies it is often seen as rambling on about un-American stuff , and since they are talking about AMERICA !
they really ought go someplace else ( usually Cuba ) to discuss that sort of thing .
And then they 're banned.I 've seen the same thing with " do n't be rude " rules .
Tell someone that a particular belief they have is racist , and on some forums you will get punished for insulting , nevermind the fact that some wackjobs people out there proudly call themselves racists ( and if you intend to have free , open discussion , you 'll have to remain neutral to both sides and favor neither ) and nevermind the fact that by some definitions their views can be considered racist .
For example ( trying to remain unbiased towards " both " sides of the fence here , again ) , you can sometimes be punished for claiming that someone is a racist for affirmative action , or can be punished for saying that someone is racist for supporting Israel 's status as an officially Jewish state .
Of course , just being contradictory enough times , particularly towards deeply-established social norms and views is seen as disruptive and can also get you kicked from forums for " being a jerk .
" This is similar to how the media marginalizes minority viewpoints in politics , by not televising them , referring to them as " spoilers " as if the votes really belong to the Big Two , treating them as sideshow attractions , and generally holding them in contempt--this applies to the Libertarians AND the left-wing parties such as the Green Party.Conformity rules everywhere , even in places that supposedly pride themselves on having open discussion and unbiased moderation .
Consensus will eventually appear and if a voice is too contradictory they 'll be seen not as a contributing member but as a disruptive element .
The only solution I can see for truly " free " discussion online ( and I am not implying that all forums should have " free " discussion , simply ones that aim to ) is to require members to have a bit of backbone and a lot of leeway on what is appropriate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In my experience online, particularly with internet forums featuring heavy political debate (or more accurately put, "argumentation"), rules like "no off-topic posting" can easily be twisted or broadened to accompany the biases of the moderators or the majority opinion to stifle dissent.How?
For example, someone who has a completely opposite opinion of the majority may often have a completely opposing ideology and thus their opposition may be seen as "trolling.
"  I'll use examples from the supposed "both sides" (yes, this is a gross simplification of political ideologies but bear with me), i.e., the left and the right on the political spectrum.
It is frequently seen as off-topic trolling to the left when they are discussing what the proper amount of taxation should be and a libertarian or conservative come in railing against ALL taxation on principle, since the tone of discussion itself was not the validity of taxation but "just the right" amount.
Of course, to many libertarians and conservatives, there is no "right amount," but it's seen as disruption and trolling all the same.Similarly for the right, when the left criticize religiously-based policies it is often seen as rambling on about un-American stuff, and since they are talking about AMERICA!
they really ought go someplace else (usually Cuba) to discuss that sort of thing.
And then they're banned.I've seen the same thing with "don't be rude" rules.
Tell someone that a particular belief they have is racist, and on some forums you will get punished for insulting, nevermind the fact that some wackjobs people out there proudly call themselves racists (and if you intend to have free, open discussion, you'll have to remain neutral to both sides and favor neither) and nevermind the fact that by some definitions their views can be considered racist.
For example (trying to remain unbiased towards "both" sides of the fence here, again), you can sometimes be punished for claiming that someone is a racist for affirmative action, or can be punished for saying that someone is racist for supporting Israel's status as an officially Jewish state.
Of course, just being contradictory enough times, particularly towards deeply-established social norms and views is seen as disruptive and can also get you kicked from forums for "being a jerk.
"This is similar to how the media marginalizes minority viewpoints in politics, by not televising them, referring to them as "spoilers" as if the votes really belong to the Big Two, treating them as sideshow attractions, and generally holding them in contempt--this applies to the Libertarians AND the left-wing parties such as the Green Party.Conformity rules everywhere, even in places that supposedly pride themselves on having open discussion and unbiased moderation.
Consensus will eventually appear and if a voice is too contradictory they'll be seen not as a contributing member but as a disruptive element.
The only solution I can see for truly  "free" discussion online (and I am not implying that all forums should have "free" discussion, simply ones that aim to) is to require members to have a bit of backbone and a lot of leeway on what is appropriate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288428</id>
	<title>Dog riding duck action!</title>
	<author>Artuir</author>
	<datestamp>1259660280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvgYTmjwDGY" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvgYTmjwDGY</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>But since I'm not on Verizon, I can post this without fear! HAHAHA!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = fvgYTmjwDGY [ youtube.com ] But since I 'm not on Verizon , I can post this without fear !
HAHAHA !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvgYTmjwDGY [youtube.com]But since I'm not on Verizon, I can post this without fear!
HAHAHA!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288496</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>idontgno</author>
	<datestamp>1259660520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Netiquette finally has a death penalty.</p><p>We could have used this wayyy back, at the beginning of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal\_September" title="wikipedia.org">The September that never ended</a> [wikipedia.org].</p><p>Now get offa my Internet, you AOL punks!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Netiquette finally has a death penalty.We could have used this wayyy back , at the beginning of The September that never ended [ wikipedia.org ] .Now get offa my Internet , you AOL punks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Netiquette finally has a death penalty.We could have used this wayyy back, at the beginning of The September that never ended [wikipedia.org].Now get offa my Internet, you AOL punks!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286540</id>
	<title>Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2</title>
	<author>oldspewey</author>
	<datestamp>1259696640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. admins should hand out 5 mod points to every user immediately, so we can go right ahead and mod every single post in this story offtopic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the / .
admins should hand out 5 mod points to every user immediately , so we can go right ahead and mod every single post in this story offtopic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the /.
admins should hand out 5 mod points to every user immediately, so we can go right ahead and mod every single post in this story offtopic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286620</id>
	<title>Restraint Of Free Speech</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259696940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they actually tried to enforce this wouldn't this just get shot down it court? I was somewhat under the impression that legal agreements i.e. terms of service etc. could not in any way restrict a persons constitutional rights?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they actually tried to enforce this would n't this just get shot down it court ?
I was somewhat under the impression that legal agreements i.e .
terms of service etc .
could not in any way restrict a persons constitutional rights ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they actually tried to enforce this wouldn't this just get shot down it court?
I was somewhat under the impression that legal agreements i.e.
terms of service etc.
could not in any way restrict a persons constitutional rights?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287558</id>
	<title>HUH???</title>
	<author>fibrewire</author>
	<datestamp>1259700060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ya know when a person gets a  new car or buys a new house, the dealer or broker takes a loan out in that person's name for the full price. so if i'm a dealer, then i get a fat check from the bank for like $30,000 to $50,000 to $200k for a house. You know that a "Verizon 2 Year Service Agreement" is the same thing? That they get a check for nearly $2,000 when you sign up for fios? Is this True? Then the day they terminate the agreement, they charge you an early termination fee? So that they can pay their accounting guys to tie up the loose ends?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ya know when a person gets a new car or buys a new house , the dealer or broker takes a loan out in that person 's name for the full price .
so if i 'm a dealer , then i get a fat check from the bank for like $ 30,000 to $ 50,000 to $ 200k for a house .
You know that a " Verizon 2 Year Service Agreement " is the same thing ?
That they get a check for nearly $ 2,000 when you sign up for fios ?
Is this True ?
Then the day they terminate the agreement , they charge you an early termination fee ?
So that they can pay their accounting guys to tie up the loose ends ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ya know when a person gets a  new car or buys a new house, the dealer or broker takes a loan out in that person's name for the full price.
so if i'm a dealer, then i get a fat check from the bank for like $30,000 to $50,000 to $200k for a house.
You know that a "Verizon 2 Year Service Agreement" is the same thing?
That they get a check for nearly $2,000 when you sign up for fios?
Is this True?
Then the day they terminate the agreement, they charge you an early termination fee?
So that they can pay their accounting guys to tie up the loose ends?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287376</id>
	<title>Re:Riiight, constitution doesn't apply.</title>
	<author>LordLimecat</author>
	<datestamp>1259699400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thats not because of the constitution, thats because of anti-discrimination laws.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats not because of the constitution , thats because of anti-discrimination laws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats not because of the constitution, thats because of anti-discrimination laws.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287386</id>
	<title>Re:Getting back on-topic...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259699460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Goodbye 4chan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Goodbye 4chan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Goodbye 4chan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564</id>
	<title>Making everyone a criminal is convenient</title>
	<author>aaandre</author>
	<datestamp>1259696700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because now Veri$on will be able to disconnect anybody for any reason under the pretext of breaking a rule. Quite convenient. Same with government and the thousands of laws.</p><p>Not every law is applied to everybody, but when anybody becomes inconvenient, there are enough laws to take them out of the picture.</p><p>The more numerous the laws, the more corrupted the state.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because now Veri $ on will be able to disconnect anybody for any reason under the pretext of breaking a rule .
Quite convenient .
Same with government and the thousands of laws.Not every law is applied to everybody , but when anybody becomes inconvenient , there are enough laws to take them out of the picture.The more numerous the laws , the more corrupted the state .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because now Veri$on will be able to disconnect anybody for any reason under the pretext of breaking a rule.
Quite convenient.
Same with government and the thousands of laws.Not every law is applied to everybody, but when anybody becomes inconvenient, there are enough laws to take them out of the picture.The more numerous the laws, the more corrupted the state.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289148</id>
	<title>Dear Verizon</title>
	<author>stubob</author>
	<datestamp>1259663220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am Spartacus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am Spartacus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am Spartacus.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287530</id>
	<title>Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1259699940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Because now Veri$on will be able to disconnect anybody for any reason under the pretext of breaking a rule. Quite convenient. Same with government and the thousands of laws.</p></div><p>Yup, my prediction is that criticizing Verizon, posting something about shit that Verizon does, or advising others not to sign up with Verizon will count as "off-topic."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because now Veri $ on will be able to disconnect anybody for any reason under the pretext of breaking a rule .
Quite convenient .
Same with government and the thousands of laws.Yup , my prediction is that criticizing Verizon , posting something about shit that Verizon does , or advising others not to sign up with Verizon will count as " off-topic .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because now Veri$on will be able to disconnect anybody for any reason under the pretext of breaking a rule.
Quite convenient.
Same with government and the thousands of laws.Yup, my prediction is that criticizing Verizon, posting something about shit that Verizon does, or advising others not to sign up with Verizon will count as "off-topic.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288762</id>
	<title>Last post</title>
	<author>halcyon1234</author>
	<datestamp>1259661480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now they just need put in something about first posts, and we're set.</p><p>Which reminds me... firs... {checks message count}... aww, c'mon! I meant for everyone else!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now they just need put in something about first posts , and we 're set.Which reminds me... firs... { checks message count } ... aww , c'mon !
I meant for everyone else !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now they just need put in something about first posts, and we're set.Which reminds me... firs... {checks message count}... aww, c'mon!
I meant for everyone else!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289256</id>
	<title>Re:Hey Verizon!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259663820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Camo sheep behind you</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Camo sheep behind you</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Camo sheep behind you</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287304</id>
	<title>Canter &amp; Siegle would protest these term</title>
	<author>KJSwartz</author>
	<datestamp>1259699100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'Nuf said?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'Nuf said ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Nuf said?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290174</id>
	<title>Re:Restraint Of Free Speech</title>
	<author>Morkano</author>
	<datestamp>1259667600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Actually, the moment they change the terms of service, the original contract is NULL and VOID. They changed the terms, now you can re-negotiate the payment.</p><p>Just send them a email saying "I accept the New AUP terms and agree to adjust my payment to $0 immediately for the duration of this change in service level. Receiving this email constitutes acceptance of the new terms by both parties."</p><p>If they can change the terms arbitrarily, then so can you. Make it hurt. Stupid should hurt.</p></div><p>Of course, then they'll just disconnect you for "uninvited" communications.</p><p>"[I]t is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to[...] (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the moment they change the terms of service , the original contract is NULL and VOID .
They changed the terms , now you can re-negotiate the payment.Just send them a email saying " I accept the New AUP terms and agree to adjust my payment to $ 0 immediately for the duration of this change in service level .
Receiving this email constitutes acceptance of the new terms by both parties .
" If they can change the terms arbitrarily , then so can you .
Make it hurt .
Stupid should hurt.Of course , then they 'll just disconnect you for " uninvited " communications .
" [ I ] t is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to [ ... ] ( b ) transmit uninvited communications , data or information "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the moment they change the terms of service, the original contract is NULL and VOID.
They changed the terms, now you can re-negotiate the payment.Just send them a email saying "I accept the New AUP terms and agree to adjust my payment to $0 immediately for the duration of this change in service level.
Receiving this email constitutes acceptance of the new terms by both parties.
"If they can change the terms arbitrarily, then so can you.
Make it hurt.
Stupid should hurt.Of course, then they'll just disconnect you for "uninvited" communications.
"[I]t is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to[...] (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287110</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286310</id>
	<title>haha that's funny</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259695860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>anyways, guys, i wanted to tell you about this new band i'm listen to. it's called gently liv###</p><p>[NO CARRIER]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>anyways , guys , i wanted to tell you about this new band i 'm listen to .
it 's called gently liv # # # [ NO CARRIER ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>anyways, guys, i wanted to tell you about this new band i'm listen to.
it's called gently liv###[NO CARRIER]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288182</id>
	<title>Re:Part (b) : "flaming"</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1259659320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I didn't see the word <a href="http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Verizon" title="wikia.com">asswipe</a> [wikia.com] anywhere! Somebody please edit that linked article!</p><p>It does say "evil" though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't see the word asswipe [ wikia.com ] anywhere !
Somebody please edit that linked article ! It does say " evil " though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't see the word asswipe [wikia.com] anywhere!
Somebody please edit that linked article!It does say "evil" though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288112</id>
	<title>Don't use it in North Korea, Syria. . .etc</title>
	<author>or-switch</author>
	<datestamp>1259658960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I like the part of the TOS that says you can't use it in North Korea, Syria, or other major/minor axis-of-evil participants.  Good luck given the rollout has been so small that I can't use FIOS in San Francisco or Silicon Valley of all places.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like the part of the TOS that says you ca n't use it in North Korea , Syria , or other major/minor axis-of-evil participants .
Good luck given the rollout has been so small that I ca n't use FIOS in San Francisco or Silicon Valley of all places .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like the part of the TOS that says you can't use it in North Korea, Syria, or other major/minor axis-of-evil participants.
Good luck given the rollout has been so small that I can't use FIOS in San Francisco or Silicon Valley of all places.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287418</id>
	<title>Re:Part (b) : "flaming"</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1259699580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You people at Verizon are a bunch of asswipes.</p></div><p>You must be new here.  On slashdot, that ain't flaming or spamming, that's preaching to the choir.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You people at Verizon are a bunch of asswipes.You must be new here .
On slashdot , that ai n't flaming or spamming , that 's preaching to the choir .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You people at Verizon are a bunch of asswipes.You must be new here.
On slashdot, that ain't flaming or spamming, that's preaching to the choir.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288864</id>
	<title>Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)?</title>
	<author>bughunter</author>
	<datestamp>1259661900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>Obviously, it's not likely they will enforce the AUP in an egregiously Draconian manner, but I for one would prefer having the outlandish bits *implied* rather than expressly stated.</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>They don't want it implied.  They want it explicit.  Because, they want to eliminate their liability.</p><p>Verizon doesn't intend to monitor your internet habits and cut you off if you regale us with stories of hot grits and Natalie Portman.  But what they do intend to do is threaten you with disconnection anytime someone complains to them about your behavior.  If someone complains to them that you didn't play nice on the internet, they are explicitly reserving the right to terminate your service by specifically including provisions that give them the legal right to disconnect you for anything they can anticipate will evoke complaints.  If they receive a complaint that you posted a loldog to a lolcats thread -BOOM- they can d/c you for viloation of the AUP, and don't have to worry about paying a lawyer to defend such heavyhandedness.  You have no grounds to litigate -- you violated their AUP.</p><p>In other words, it's there to allow them to protect themselves from third parties, not to actively regulate your behavior as a subscriber.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously , it 's not likely they will enforce the AUP in an egregiously Draconian manner , but I for one would prefer having the outlandish bits * implied * rather than expressly stated .
They do n't want it implied .
They want it explicit .
Because , they want to eliminate their liability.Verizon does n't intend to monitor your internet habits and cut you off if you regale us with stories of hot grits and Natalie Portman .
But what they do intend to do is threaten you with disconnection anytime someone complains to them about your behavior .
If someone complains to them that you did n't play nice on the internet , they are explicitly reserving the right to terminate your service by specifically including provisions that give them the legal right to disconnect you for anything they can anticipate will evoke complaints .
If they receive a complaint that you posted a loldog to a lolcats thread -BOOM- they can d/c you for viloation of the AUP , and do n't have to worry about paying a lawyer to defend such heavyhandedness .
You have no grounds to litigate -- you violated their AUP.In other words , it 's there to allow them to protect themselves from third parties , not to actively regulate your behavior as a subscriber .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Obviously, it's not likely they will enforce the AUP in an egregiously Draconian manner, but I for one would prefer having the outlandish bits *implied* rather than expressly stated.
They don't want it implied.
They want it explicit.
Because, they want to eliminate their liability.Verizon doesn't intend to monitor your internet habits and cut you off if you regale us with stories of hot grits and Natalie Portman.
But what they do intend to do is threaten you with disconnection anytime someone complains to them about your behavior.
If someone complains to them that you didn't play nice on the internet, they are explicitly reserving the right to terminate your service by specifically including provisions that give them the legal right to disconnect you for anything they can anticipate will evoke complaints.
If they receive a complaint that you posted a loldog to a lolcats thread -BOOM- they can d/c you for viloation of the AUP, and don't have to worry about paying a lawyer to defend such heavyhandedness.
You have no grounds to litigate -- you violated their AUP.In other words, it's there to allow them to protect themselves from third parties, not to actively regulate your behavior as a subscriber.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289054</id>
	<title>This article is worse than Hitler.</title>
	<author>vrbtm</author>
	<datestamp>1259662800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I liked it better when it was called Mine Kampf.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I liked it better when it was called Mine Kampf .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I liked it better when it was called Mine Kampf.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287794</id>
	<title>FiOS is hardly a right</title>
	<author>Tanman</author>
	<datestamp>1259700960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Court would not shoot this down.  Not only is FiOS not required to post your free speech, but it is actually a luxury option for doing so.  If you can prove that FiOS is the only option for online access, then *maybe* you'd have something. Instead, you got nothin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Court would not shoot this down .
Not only is FiOS not required to post your free speech , but it is actually a luxury option for doing so .
If you can prove that FiOS is the only option for online access , then * maybe * you 'd have something .
Instead , you got nothin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Court would not shoot this down.
Not only is FiOS not required to post your free speech, but it is actually a luxury option for doing so.
If you can prove that FiOS is the only option for online access, then *maybe* you'd have something.
Instead, you got nothin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30296978</id>
	<title>Not a recent change...</title>
	<author>Lorki</author>
	<datestamp>1259595060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As despicable as the Verizon AUP is, this is not a new change. <a href="http://dankeenan.blogspot.com/2006/10/fios-rant.html" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Here</a> [blogspot.com] is a link to a rant in 2006 about the FIOS TOS including a mention of offtopic posting. In other current news, Ban Ki-moon has been elected to replace Kofi Annan as the secretary-general of the UN...</htmltext>
<tokenext>As despicable as the Verizon AUP is , this is not a new change .
Here [ blogspot.com ] is a link to a rant in 2006 about the FIOS TOS including a mention of offtopic posting .
In other current news , Ban Ki-moon has been elected to replace Kofi Annan as the secretary-general of the UN.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As despicable as the Verizon AUP is, this is not a new change.
Here [blogspot.com] is a link to a rant in 2006 about the FIOS TOS including a mention of offtopic posting.
In other current news, Ban Ki-moon has been elected to replace Kofi Annan as the secretary-general of the UN...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287190</id>
	<title>My mature reasoned response!</title>
	<author>jocabergs</author>
	<datestamp>1259698680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Mauris consequat velit ut turpis lobortis tempor nec at metus. Donec rutrum egestas justo, non viverra tortor rutrum ac. Nam a magna id magna placerat dignissim non eget purus. Morbi ut velit erat, nec dapibus nisi. Nunc in libero arcu. Maecenas ut erat eu tortor dapibus rutrum in sit amet magna. Phasellus ultrices porta congue. Fusce nec quam diam, ut bibendum orci. Sed vulputate vestibulum egestas. Aliquam a ipsum id massa cursus interdum eu nec dolor. Nullam viverra ullamcorper nisl, vitae ultrices diam facilisis eleifend. Vivamus mauris justo, sagittis a varius vitae, viverra at turpis. Nulla facilisi. Ut egestas justo vitae massa iaculis convallis. Donec et nulla a erat aliquet dignissim. In turpis nibh, rhoncus nec sollicitudin vitae, convallis et lacus. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Donec semper, orci sit amet rutrum cursus, arcu libero ultrices massa, mattis hendrerit velit justo id risus. Sed eu mattis enim.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>//hehe</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet , consectetur adipiscing elit .
Mauris consequat velit ut turpis lobortis tempor nec at metus .
Donec rutrum egestas justo , non viverra tortor rutrum ac .
Nam a magna id magna placerat dignissim non eget purus .
Morbi ut velit erat , nec dapibus nisi .
Nunc in libero arcu .
Maecenas ut erat eu tortor dapibus rutrum in sit amet magna .
Phasellus ultrices porta congue .
Fusce nec quam diam , ut bibendum orci .
Sed vulputate vestibulum egestas .
Aliquam a ipsum id massa cursus interdum eu nec dolor .
Nullam viverra ullamcorper nisl , vitae ultrices diam facilisis eleifend .
Vivamus mauris justo , sagittis a varius vitae , viverra at turpis .
Nulla facilisi .
Ut egestas justo vitae massa iaculis convallis .
Donec et nulla a erat aliquet dignissim .
In turpis nibh , rhoncus nec sollicitudin vitae , convallis et lacus .
Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra , per inceptos himenaeos .
Donec semper , orci sit amet rutrum cursus , arcu libero ultrices massa , mattis hendrerit velit justo id risus .
Sed eu mattis enim .
//hehe</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
Mauris consequat velit ut turpis lobortis tempor nec at metus.
Donec rutrum egestas justo, non viverra tortor rutrum ac.
Nam a magna id magna placerat dignissim non eget purus.
Morbi ut velit erat, nec dapibus nisi.
Nunc in libero arcu.
Maecenas ut erat eu tortor dapibus rutrum in sit amet magna.
Phasellus ultrices porta congue.
Fusce nec quam diam, ut bibendum orci.
Sed vulputate vestibulum egestas.
Aliquam a ipsum id massa cursus interdum eu nec dolor.
Nullam viverra ullamcorper nisl, vitae ultrices diam facilisis eleifend.
Vivamus mauris justo, sagittis a varius vitae, viverra at turpis.
Nulla facilisi.
Ut egestas justo vitae massa iaculis convallis.
Donec et nulla a erat aliquet dignissim.
In turpis nibh, rhoncus nec sollicitudin vitae, convallis et lacus.
Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos.
Donec semper, orci sit amet rutrum cursus, arcu libero ultrices massa, mattis hendrerit velit justo id risus.
Sed eu mattis enim.
//hehe</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289592</id>
	<title>*sigh* Another 17-year-old Libertarian...</title>
	<author>jeko</author>
	<datestamp>1259665200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Going against my better judgement and Ben Franklin's advice, but this bullshit is getting out of hand...</p><p>Look, I know it's fashionable to go with the thin, reedy, overly-nasal GOP line on this, but if you're an American, then the First Amendment DOES apply to you. It applies if you're a judge, a cop, a CEO or the school janitor. The Government doesn't get to do an end run around the Consitution by hiring out some company to do its dirty work for it.</p><p>*Waits for the pencil-necked, pasty-faced, can't-get-laid-in-his-Momma's-basement putz in the back of the room to get it out of his system.*</p><p>Yeah, I know. Strictly speaking, with the same sort of "Urkel-doesn't-get-it-so-he-ain't-ever-gonna-get-it" pickiness that makes all the grownups wanna send you to your room, the Constitution addresses the government. I know.</p><p>*Waits a little more.. and still more...*</p><p>Because, Junior, the Bill of Rights is more than just a string of damn code, that's why. It's an elaboration of the principles that we as Americans hold dear. It's a clumsy attempt to codify the way of life that we won for ourselves at Yorktown. It's not just the rules of the playground. It's our damn National DNA, that's why.</p><p>I know you probably weren't raised right, so you won't understand this, but It's WHO WE ARE. It was a radical idea in 1644 when John Milton wrote the "Areopagitica." It was a belief we all held in our bones by 1776.</p><p>We. Don't. Like. Censorship. We believe in the Marketplace of Ideas (Google it). We believe the cure for Bad Speech is More Speech.</p><p>Anyone who holds power, or so much as puts up a public bulletin board, it bound by it, not because some municipal code requires it, but because that's who we are. We as Americans detest censorship in all its forms, wherever it rears its head.</p><p>Verizon is wrong not because they are breaking some law, but because the action itself offends the sensibilities of the country that sustains it. We're all free men here. We're not afraid to hear dissenting opinions, and we for damn sure don't hide from them behind red tape and bureaucratic crap like "terms of service."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Going against my better judgement and Ben Franklin 's advice , but this bullshit is getting out of hand...Look , I know it 's fashionable to go with the thin , reedy , overly-nasal GOP line on this , but if you 're an American , then the First Amendment DOES apply to you .
It applies if you 're a judge , a cop , a CEO or the school janitor .
The Government does n't get to do an end run around the Consitution by hiring out some company to do its dirty work for it .
* Waits for the pencil-necked , pasty-faced , ca n't-get-laid-in-his-Momma 's-basement putz in the back of the room to get it out of his system .
* Yeah , I know .
Strictly speaking , with the same sort of " Urkel-does n't-get-it-so-he-ai n't-ever-gon na-get-it " pickiness that makes all the grownups wan na send you to your room , the Constitution addresses the government .
I know .
* Waits a little more.. and still more... * Because , Junior , the Bill of Rights is more than just a string of damn code , that 's why .
It 's an elaboration of the principles that we as Americans hold dear .
It 's a clumsy attempt to codify the way of life that we won for ourselves at Yorktown .
It 's not just the rules of the playground .
It 's our damn National DNA , that 's why.I know you probably were n't raised right , so you wo n't understand this , but It 's WHO WE ARE .
It was a radical idea in 1644 when John Milton wrote the " Areopagitica .
" It was a belief we all held in our bones by 1776.We .
Do n't. Like .
Censorship. We believe in the Marketplace of Ideas ( Google it ) .
We believe the cure for Bad Speech is More Speech.Anyone who holds power , or so much as puts up a public bulletin board , it bound by it , not because some municipal code requires it , but because that 's who we are .
We as Americans detest censorship in all its forms , wherever it rears its head.Verizon is wrong not because they are breaking some law , but because the action itself offends the sensibilities of the country that sustains it .
We 're all free men here .
We 're not afraid to hear dissenting opinions , and we for damn sure do n't hide from them behind red tape and bureaucratic crap like " terms of service .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Going against my better judgement and Ben Franklin's advice, but this bullshit is getting out of hand...Look, I know it's fashionable to go with the thin, reedy, overly-nasal GOP line on this, but if you're an American, then the First Amendment DOES apply to you.
It applies if you're a judge, a cop, a CEO or the school janitor.
The Government doesn't get to do an end run around the Consitution by hiring out some company to do its dirty work for it.
*Waits for the pencil-necked, pasty-faced, can't-get-laid-in-his-Momma's-basement putz in the back of the room to get it out of his system.
*Yeah, I know.
Strictly speaking, with the same sort of "Urkel-doesn't-get-it-so-he-ain't-ever-gonna-get-it" pickiness that makes all the grownups wanna send you to your room, the Constitution addresses the government.
I know.
*Waits a little more.. and still more...*Because, Junior, the Bill of Rights is more than just a string of damn code, that's why.
It's an elaboration of the principles that we as Americans hold dear.
It's a clumsy attempt to codify the way of life that we won for ourselves at Yorktown.
It's not just the rules of the playground.
It's our damn National DNA, that's why.I know you probably weren't raised right, so you won't understand this, but It's WHO WE ARE.
It was a radical idea in 1644 when John Milton wrote the "Areopagitica.
" It was a belief we all held in our bones by 1776.We.
Don't. Like.
Censorship. We believe in the Marketplace of Ideas (Google it).
We believe the cure for Bad Speech is More Speech.Anyone who holds power, or so much as puts up a public bulletin board, it bound by it, not because some municipal code requires it, but because that's who we are.
We as Americans detest censorship in all its forms, wherever it rears its head.Verizon is wrong not because they are breaking some law, but because the action itself offends the sensibilities of the country that sustains it.
We're all free men here.
We're not afraid to hear dissenting opinions, and we for damn sure don't hide from them behind red tape and bureaucratic crap like "terms of service.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286850</id>
	<title>Re:I'm Not!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259697600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suspect this is just the next level of ISPs' disallowing spamming. They probably aren't planning to actively enforce it, but if it were to come to their attention that one of their accounts is being used to post 100's of more or less subtle marketing messages a day to forums, they reserve the right to cut the account off. <br>That said I actually have no idea, just a guess.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect this is just the next level of ISPs ' disallowing spamming .
They probably are n't planning to actively enforce it , but if it were to come to their attention that one of their accounts is being used to post 100 's of more or less subtle marketing messages a day to forums , they reserve the right to cut the account off .
That said I actually have no idea , just a guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect this is just the next level of ISPs' disallowing spamming.
They probably aren't planning to actively enforce it, but if it were to come to their attention that one of their accounts is being used to post 100's of more or less subtle marketing messages a day to forums, they reserve the right to cut the account off.
That said I actually have no idea, just a guess.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30305104</id>
	<title>Generate excessive amounts of... traffic</title>
	<author>laddiebuck</author>
	<datestamp>1259584440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>(i) generate excessive amounts of email or other Internet traffic</i> <br> <br>

That's the worst clause. So now you can be cut off for merely using your pipe to its maximum.</htmltext>
<tokenext>( i ) generate excessive amounts of email or other Internet traffic That 's the worst clause .
So now you can be cut off for merely using your pipe to its maximum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(i) generate excessive amounts of email or other Internet traffic  

That's the worst clause.
So now you can be cut off for merely using your pipe to its maximum.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287248</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>thatskinnyguy</author>
	<datestamp>1259698860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How many memories does it take to install Windows 95 to my motherboard?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How many memories does it take to install Windows 95 to my motherboard ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many memories does it take to install Windows 95 to my motherboard?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287562</id>
	<title>Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1259700060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So the least corrupt state would be anarchy.  Like Somalia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the least corrupt state would be anarchy .
Like Somalia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the least corrupt state would be anarchy.
Like Somalia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287496</id>
	<title>Re:Part (b) : "flaming"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259699820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ALBATROS! (since flaming is no longer allowed)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ALBATROS !
( since flaming is no longer allowed )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ALBATROS!
(since flaming is no longer allowed)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286816</id>
	<title>I'm calling Verizon on ALL OF YOU!!!</title>
	<author>Jazz-Masta</author>
	<datestamp>1259697480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How DARE you break the terms of your agreement! Have we stooped so low? What next? Downloading of Movies, Music, etc?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How DARE you break the terms of your agreement !
Have we stooped so low ?
What next ?
Downloading of Movies , Music , etc ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How DARE you break the terms of your agreement!
Have we stooped so low?
What next?
Downloading of Movies, Music, etc?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290218</id>
	<title>Looks like typical anti-spam/spoof/harass overkill</title>
	<author>billstewart</author>
	<datestamp>1259667780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While it looks like too many lawyers and non-lawyers were copying other services' AUPs, it looks like what they're really trying to do is give themselves leverage to drop you if you engage in activities that get them hit with too many complaints.  That's not the same as saying that they'll go trying to police your postings (yeah, like that would make financial sense), but they want to be able to kill spammers, blog-comment-spammers, and anybody else that causes them trouble.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While it looks like too many lawyers and non-lawyers were copying other services ' AUPs , it looks like what they 're really trying to do is give themselves leverage to drop you if you engage in activities that get them hit with too many complaints .
That 's not the same as saying that they 'll go trying to police your postings ( yeah , like that would make financial sense ) , but they want to be able to kill spammers , blog-comment-spammers , and anybody else that causes them trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While it looks like too many lawyers and non-lawyers were copying other services' AUPs, it looks like what they're really trying to do is give themselves leverage to drop you if you engage in activities that get them hit with too many complaints.
That's not the same as saying that they'll go trying to police your postings (yeah, like that would make financial sense), but they want to be able to kill spammers, blog-comment-spammers, and anybody else that causes them trouble.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30292866</id>
	<title>Dammit!</title>
	<author>plaxion</author>
	<datestamp>1259682900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For a second there I thought<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. finally implemented the ability to moderate the stories themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For a second there I thought / .
finally implemented the ability to moderate the stories themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a second there I thought /.
finally implemented the ability to moderate the stories themselves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288204</id>
	<title>Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2</title>
	<author>spidercoz</author>
	<datestamp>1259659380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>no no, none of the posts in this thread should be offtopic, that's the point<br> <br>
welcome to slashdot, where irony, humor, and common sense collide and explode in a rain of...hey, where'd my sandwich go?</htmltext>
<tokenext>no no , none of the posts in this thread should be offtopic , that 's the point welcome to slashdot , where irony , humor , and common sense collide and explode in a rain of...hey , where 'd my sandwich go ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no no, none of the posts in this thread should be offtopic, that's the point 
welcome to slashdot, where irony, humor, and common sense collide and explode in a rain of...hey, where'd my sandwich go?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290968</id>
	<title>Re:Part (b) : "flaming"</title>
	<author>ari\_j</author>
	<datestamp>1259671320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, how dare they ban flaming!  I like my beers cold and my homosexuals flaNO CARRIER</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , how dare they ban flaming !
I like my beers cold and my homosexuals flaNO CARRIER</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, how dare they ban flaming!
I like my beers cold and my homosexuals flaNO CARRIER</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289218</id>
	<title>time for the big guns.</title>
	<author>eXFeLoN</author>
	<datestamp>1259663700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ok but what would Hitler do in this situation?  Discuss.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok but what would Hitler do in this situation ?
Discuss .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok but what would Hitler do in this situation?
Discuss.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288284</id>
	<title>I'm more concerned about this clause:</title>
	<author>toppavak</author>
	<datestamp>1259659680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"(i) generate excessive amounts of email or other Internet traffic;"<br> <br>So what exactly is an excessive amount of email or other Internet traffic?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" ( i ) generate excessive amounts of email or other Internet traffic ; " So what exactly is an excessive amount of email or other Internet traffic ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"(i) generate excessive amounts of email or other Internet traffic;" So what exactly is an excessive amount of email or other Internet traffic?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286602</id>
	<title>Waste of money on a lawyer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259696880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So they overpaid for the lawyer who wrote their TOS?  Should they continue to waste more money on that and raise customer's prices?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So they overpaid for the lawyer who wrote their TOS ?
Should they continue to waste more money on that and raise customer 's prices ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So they overpaid for the lawyer who wrote their TOS?
Should they continue to waste more money on that and raise customer's prices?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290228</id>
	<title>Headphone review: v-moda vibe</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1259667840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A few days ago my Sennheiser CX300 (in-ear headphones) broke and, due to a recommendation by a friend with respect to their longevity, I decided to buy myself the v-moda vibe (also in-ear headphones, even though they do sound like a sex toy). The price I paid was 43 EUR (~64 USD), S/H included.<br>
<br>
The build quality of the vibe is fairly good, with pretty much everything but the cables being made of metal. The cables are the usual thin stranded wire, covered by what v-moda asserts to be kevlar, which is covered by a layer of clear plastic (which apparently is only the case if you buy it in the "Flashblack" color scheme). One improvement of the cables over the CX300's is that the surface is smoother, causing the vibe to generate fewer friction sounds. Unfortunately, the cable isn't any longer than the Sennheiser's, measuring only about 115 cm (~45.5 in) plug-to-earphone. Also, the plug is not angled, like most headphones', but straight, which might not be to everyone's taste.<br>
<br>
You also get a faux leather carrying bag, a cable wrapping helper made from silicone and six silicone ear fittings (three sizes each in transparent and black) - all in all a rather decent set of extras.<br>
<br>
The vibe is one of the few headphones with a plug that doesn't slip out of a unibody MBP's audio jack at the slightest touch. It generally forms very solid connections with the jacks you plug it into, which prevents accidental unplugging.<br>
<br>
Sound-wise it tends to emphasize the bass and, slightly, the highs. In my opinion this means a downgrade in audio quality from the more balanced CX300 as I value clear mid-range frequencies but someone interested in an affordable open in-ear headphone with a solid bass could certainly give the vibe a try.<br>
If I had to buy again, I'd probably go with the CX300, though - if I could still find one. Pretty much all retailers have switched over to the more expensive CX-300 II. Longevity might still make the vibe the better deal but only time will tell that.<br>
<br>
PROS:<br>
- good accessories package (especially the double set of fittings)
- smooth, supposedly damage-resistant cables<br>
- plug doesn't slip out of MBP audio jack<br>
<br>
CONS:<br>
- emphasize on bass (not a concern if you want that)<br>
- cable could be a bit longer</htmltext>
<tokenext>A few days ago my Sennheiser CX300 ( in-ear headphones ) broke and , due to a recommendation by a friend with respect to their longevity , I decided to buy myself the v-moda vibe ( also in-ear headphones , even though they do sound like a sex toy ) .
The price I paid was 43 EUR ( ~ 64 USD ) , S/H included .
The build quality of the vibe is fairly good , with pretty much everything but the cables being made of metal .
The cables are the usual thin stranded wire , covered by what v-moda asserts to be kevlar , which is covered by a layer of clear plastic ( which apparently is only the case if you buy it in the " Flashblack " color scheme ) .
One improvement of the cables over the CX300 's is that the surface is smoother , causing the vibe to generate fewer friction sounds .
Unfortunately , the cable is n't any longer than the Sennheiser 's , measuring only about 115 cm ( ~ 45.5 in ) plug-to-earphone .
Also , the plug is not angled , like most headphones ' , but straight , which might not be to everyone 's taste .
You also get a faux leather carrying bag , a cable wrapping helper made from silicone and six silicone ear fittings ( three sizes each in transparent and black ) - all in all a rather decent set of extras .
The vibe is one of the few headphones with a plug that does n't slip out of a unibody MBP 's audio jack at the slightest touch .
It generally forms very solid connections with the jacks you plug it into , which prevents accidental unplugging .
Sound-wise it tends to emphasize the bass and , slightly , the highs .
In my opinion this means a downgrade in audio quality from the more balanced CX300 as I value clear mid-range frequencies but someone interested in an affordable open in-ear headphone with a solid bass could certainly give the vibe a try .
If I had to buy again , I 'd probably go with the CX300 , though - if I could still find one .
Pretty much all retailers have switched over to the more expensive CX-300 II .
Longevity might still make the vibe the better deal but only time will tell that .
PROS : - good accessories package ( especially the double set of fittings ) - smooth , supposedly damage-resistant cables - plug does n't slip out of MBP audio jack CONS : - emphasize on bass ( not a concern if you want that ) - cable could be a bit longer</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A few days ago my Sennheiser CX300 (in-ear headphones) broke and, due to a recommendation by a friend with respect to their longevity, I decided to buy myself the v-moda vibe (also in-ear headphones, even though they do sound like a sex toy).
The price I paid was 43 EUR (~64 USD), S/H included.
The build quality of the vibe is fairly good, with pretty much everything but the cables being made of metal.
The cables are the usual thin stranded wire, covered by what v-moda asserts to be kevlar, which is covered by a layer of clear plastic (which apparently is only the case if you buy it in the "Flashblack" color scheme).
One improvement of the cables over the CX300's is that the surface is smoother, causing the vibe to generate fewer friction sounds.
Unfortunately, the cable isn't any longer than the Sennheiser's, measuring only about 115 cm (~45.5 in) plug-to-earphone.
Also, the plug is not angled, like most headphones', but straight, which might not be to everyone's taste.
You also get a faux leather carrying bag, a cable wrapping helper made from silicone and six silicone ear fittings (three sizes each in transparent and black) - all in all a rather decent set of extras.
The vibe is one of the few headphones with a plug that doesn't slip out of a unibody MBP's audio jack at the slightest touch.
It generally forms very solid connections with the jacks you plug it into, which prevents accidental unplugging.
Sound-wise it tends to emphasize the bass and, slightly, the highs.
In my opinion this means a downgrade in audio quality from the more balanced CX300 as I value clear mid-range frequencies but someone interested in an affordable open in-ear headphone with a solid bass could certainly give the vibe a try.
If I had to buy again, I'd probably go with the CX300, though - if I could still find one.
Pretty much all retailers have switched over to the more expensive CX-300 II.
Longevity might still make the vibe the better deal but only time will tell that.
PROS:
- good accessories package (especially the double set of fittings)
- smooth, supposedly damage-resistant cables
- plug doesn't slip out of MBP audio jack

CONS:
- emphasize on bass (not a concern if you want that)
- cable could be a bit longer</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30291418</id>
	<title>More changes??!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259673480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As set forth in Paragraph 3 of the Terms of Service, your<br>continued use of the Service after the effective date of this change<br>will constitute your agreement to the change.<br>1. If you are on a term plan and Verizon ceases offering service to<br>your location prior to the end of your term commitment, you will not<br>have to pay an Early Termination Fee.</p></div><p>Just got this from Verizon today. I wonder what they will call the fee?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As set forth in Paragraph 3 of the Terms of Service , yourcontinued use of the Service after the effective date of this changewill constitute your agreement to the change.1 .
If you are on a term plan and Verizon ceases offering service toyour location prior to the end of your term commitment , you will nothave to pay an Early Termination Fee.Just got this from Verizon today .
I wonder what they will call the fee ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As set forth in Paragraph 3 of the Terms of Service, yourcontinued use of the Service after the effective date of this changewill constitute your agreement to the change.1.
If you are on a term plan and Verizon ceases offering service toyour location prior to the end of your term commitment, you will nothave to pay an Early Termination Fee.Just got this from Verizon today.
I wonder what they will call the fee?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289296</id>
	<title>Out Sourcing of Business Decisions Now?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259663940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>FTFA, it is clear that who ever wrote it does not know about American Constitutional Law, American Civil Liberties, and Class Action Lawsuits.  One can clearly notice that no one signed their name to this writing; what kind of person does not sign their name to a document they have created?  It's not the kind of person that you'd bring home to show Mom, and Dad to.  I can see the <a href="http://www.aclu.org/" title="aclu.org">ACLU</a> [aclu.org] thinking, "Ka-Ching", to this law suit.  So it's going to boil down to how much are the punitive damages here?  How about 3\% of Verizon's Gross Sales for starters?  But how much are an American's Civil Rights worth?  By Verizon's past business practices, not much.  I cannot help but wonder when the Federal Government will get tired of Suspected Criminal Gangs "Wip Sawing" Federal Regulations.  Maybe this "To Big To Fail" crap can be quietly crib smothered.  "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competition\_law" title="wikipedia.org">Monopolistic Practices, i.e. Global Market</a> [wikipedia.org]" are getting to be a pain in my empty wallet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTFA , it is clear that who ever wrote it does not know about American Constitutional Law , American Civil Liberties , and Class Action Lawsuits .
One can clearly notice that no one signed their name to this writing ; what kind of person does not sign their name to a document they have created ?
It 's not the kind of person that you 'd bring home to show Mom , and Dad to .
I can see the ACLU [ aclu.org ] thinking , " Ka-Ching " , to this law suit .
So it 's going to boil down to how much are the punitive damages here ?
How about 3 \ % of Verizon 's Gross Sales for starters ?
But how much are an American 's Civil Rights worth ?
By Verizon 's past business practices , not much .
I can not help but wonder when the Federal Government will get tired of Suspected Criminal Gangs " Wip Sawing " Federal Regulations .
Maybe this " To Big To Fail " crap can be quietly crib smothered .
" Monopolistic Practices , i.e .
Global Market [ wikipedia.org ] " are getting to be a pain in my empty wallet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTFA, it is clear that who ever wrote it does not know about American Constitutional Law, American Civil Liberties, and Class Action Lawsuits.
One can clearly notice that no one signed their name to this writing; what kind of person does not sign their name to a document they have created?
It's not the kind of person that you'd bring home to show Mom, and Dad to.
I can see the ACLU [aclu.org] thinking, "Ka-Ching", to this law suit.
So it's going to boil down to how much are the punitive damages here?
How about 3\% of Verizon's Gross Sales for starters?
But how much are an American's Civil Rights worth?
By Verizon's past business practices, not much.
I cannot help but wonder when the Federal Government will get tired of Suspected Criminal Gangs "Wip Sawing" Federal Regulations.
Maybe this "To Big To Fail" crap can be quietly crib smothered.
"Monopolistic Practices, i.e.
Global Market [wikipedia.org]" are getting to be a pain in my empty wallet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352</id>
	<title>I'm Not!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259695980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> At this point, every FiOS-based Slashdot user is breaking the new AUP.</p></div><p>I think I'll be the first one to stay ON TOPIC!!!</p><p>Seriously though - how are they going to enforce this without reading the information I'm sending over the net. Shouldn't that be Illegal?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>At this point , every FiOS-based Slashdot user is breaking the new AUP.I think I 'll be the first one to stay ON TOPIC ! !
! Seriously though - how are they going to enforce this without reading the information I 'm sending over the net .
Should n't that be Illegal ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> At this point, every FiOS-based Slashdot user is breaking the new AUP.I think I'll be the first one to stay ON TOPIC!!
!Seriously though - how are they going to enforce this without reading the information I'm sending over the net.
Shouldn't that be Illegal?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288078</id>
	<title>Re:Riiight, constitution doesn't apply.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259658780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The constitution doesn't protect against racial discrimination.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The constitution does n't protect against racial discrimination .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The constitution doesn't protect against racial discrimination.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289116</id>
	<title>Re:Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube?</title>
	<author>stubob</author>
	<datestamp>1259663100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nor was it presumably capable of destroying a star.  Now, the super star destroyer surely was capable of destroying a superstar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nor was it presumably capable of destroying a star .
Now , the super star destroyer surely was capable of destroying a superstar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nor was it presumably capable of destroying a star.
Now, the super star destroyer surely was capable of destroying a superstar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30291880</id>
	<title>I ATE THEM!</title>
	<author>bonze</author>
	<datestamp>1259676000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>THERE ARE THINGS MAN WAS NOT MEANT TO KNOW! HERE ARE A FEW!</p><p>"So did you hear the story about Gregg and Tolos? Anyway Tolos<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... he's this Rottweiler, you see<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..."<br>[details omitted]</p><p>"Alone at home, Gregg's excitement grew and grew... he grasped the cord and thrust the plug home! Soon he would be plugged IN... consequences be damned! As the drool of long-suppressed anticipation of THE FORBIDDEN ACT dripped from his lips, the electric shock from the amplifier chassis coursed through his brain like a million electric eels, annihilating the very substance of his grey matter, and even so he REACHED FOR THE GUITAR to COMMIT THE ULTIMATE SIN<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... "<br>[In compliance with the Federal Communication Commissions' Good Neighbor Noise Reducation Ordinance of 1993, the remainder of this passage has been squelched.]</p><p>"And so there was the master tape for 'Back From Samoa', but there no longer, so where was it? Maybe I a..."<br>[transmission broken]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>THERE ARE THINGS MAN WAS NOT MEANT TO KNOW !
HERE ARE A FEW !
" So did you hear the story about Gregg and Tolos ?
Anyway Tolos ... he 's this Rottweiler , you see ... " [ details omitted ] " Alone at home , Gregg 's excitement grew and grew... he grasped the cord and thrust the plug home !
Soon he would be plugged IN... consequences be damned !
As the drool of long-suppressed anticipation of THE FORBIDDEN ACT dripped from his lips , the electric shock from the amplifier chassis coursed through his brain like a million electric eels , annihilating the very substance of his grey matter , and even so he REACHED FOR THE GUITAR to COMMIT THE ULTIMATE SIN ... " [ In compliance with the Federal Communication Commissions ' Good Neighbor Noise Reducation Ordinance of 1993 , the remainder of this passage has been squelched .
] " And so there was the master tape for 'Back From Samoa ' , but there no longer , so where was it ?
Maybe I a... " [ transmission broken ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>THERE ARE THINGS MAN WAS NOT MEANT TO KNOW!
HERE ARE A FEW!
"So did you hear the story about Gregg and Tolos?
Anyway Tolos ... he's this Rottweiler, you see ..."[details omitted]"Alone at home, Gregg's excitement grew and grew... he grasped the cord and thrust the plug home!
Soon he would be plugged IN... consequences be damned!
As the drool of long-suppressed anticipation of THE FORBIDDEN ACT dripped from his lips, the electric shock from the amplifier chassis coursed through his brain like a million electric eels, annihilating the very substance of his grey matter, and even so he REACHED FOR THE GUITAR to COMMIT THE ULTIMATE SIN ... "[In compliance with the Federal Communication Commissions' Good Neighbor Noise Reducation Ordinance of 1993, the remainder of this passage has been squelched.
]"And so there was the master tape for 'Back From Samoa', but there no longer, so where was it?
Maybe I a..."[transmission broken]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286386</id>
	<title>Star Destroyer Vs. Borg Cube?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259696100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Discuss.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Discuss .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Discuss.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290486</id>
	<title>It could be worse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259669100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>#1 Internet posts must be done under your real name, no handle, no nickname, no fake name. If you are found not using your real name you will be dropped.</p><p>#2 Opinions and insults are not allowed. If you don't make statements of facts that are not libelious or slanderous, you will be dropped. If you are found making an opinion or insult or anything not a fact that can be proven, you will be dropped.</p><p>#3 No trolling no cyber bullying, if you harass someone in this manner you will be dropped.</p><p>#4 No hate speech against any group, you will be dropped.</p><p>#5 Visits only to approved web sites, if you visit the wrong type of web sites as defined by our management, then you will be dropped.</p><p>#6 No porno, if you access porn of any type you will be dropped.</p><p>#7 Windows only, no Linux, Mac OSX, or non-Window OS will be allowed to use our Internet services. If you are found to use a non-Windows OS you will be dropped.</p><p>#8 You cannot use the Internet for pranks, jokes, humor, or anything of the funny nature or you will be dropped. Be serious or find another ISP.</p><p>#9 No proxy servers and other software and services that hide your IP address. We consider this criminal activity and you will be dropped.</p><p>#10 No P2P file sharing, as a result bandwidth will be capped to 19.2KBps, use of any more than that will be considered illegal download of copyrighted materials and you will be dropped. Also see rule 7 no Linux ISO downloads either as we consider it illegal use of P2P networks and don't see Linux as a valid OS to use with our Internet services.</p><p>P.S. Oh by the way, spammers, scammers, get rick quick Ponzi schemes, and other stuff is allowed, as long as you use your real name and don't violate any of the other rules.</p><p>P.P.S. Oh by the way we made a deal with the NSA/CIA/FBI etc to wirelessly wiretap your Internet connection and give up data on you to the government for suspicious activity like breaking rules 1 to 7 or others.</p><p>P.P.P.S. Oh by the way this is now federal law and approved by the UN so now all ISPs will adopt these code violations.</p><p>P.P.P.P.S. If you violate any of these rules/laws or we even perceive or think you did, you will be <a href="http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Banned\_from\_the\_Internet" title="wikia.com">Banned from the Internet</a> [wikia.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext># 1 Internet posts must be done under your real name , no handle , no nickname , no fake name .
If you are found not using your real name you will be dropped. # 2 Opinions and insults are not allowed .
If you do n't make statements of facts that are not libelious or slanderous , you will be dropped .
If you are found making an opinion or insult or anything not a fact that can be proven , you will be dropped. # 3 No trolling no cyber bullying , if you harass someone in this manner you will be dropped. # 4 No hate speech against any group , you will be dropped. # 5 Visits only to approved web sites , if you visit the wrong type of web sites as defined by our management , then you will be dropped. # 6 No porno , if you access porn of any type you will be dropped. # 7 Windows only , no Linux , Mac OSX , or non-Window OS will be allowed to use our Internet services .
If you are found to use a non-Windows OS you will be dropped. # 8 You can not use the Internet for pranks , jokes , humor , or anything of the funny nature or you will be dropped .
Be serious or find another ISP. # 9 No proxy servers and other software and services that hide your IP address .
We consider this criminal activity and you will be dropped. # 10 No P2P file sharing , as a result bandwidth will be capped to 19.2KBps , use of any more than that will be considered illegal download of copyrighted materials and you will be dropped .
Also see rule 7 no Linux ISO downloads either as we consider it illegal use of P2P networks and do n't see Linux as a valid OS to use with our Internet services.P.S .
Oh by the way , spammers , scammers , get rick quick Ponzi schemes , and other stuff is allowed , as long as you use your real name and do n't violate any of the other rules.P.P.S .
Oh by the way we made a deal with the NSA/CIA/FBI etc to wirelessly wiretap your Internet connection and give up data on you to the government for suspicious activity like breaking rules 1 to 7 or others.P.P.P.S .
Oh by the way this is now federal law and approved by the UN so now all ISPs will adopt these code violations.P.P.P.P.S .
If you violate any of these rules/laws or we even perceive or think you did , you will be Banned from the Internet [ wikia.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>#1 Internet posts must be done under your real name, no handle, no nickname, no fake name.
If you are found not using your real name you will be dropped.#2 Opinions and insults are not allowed.
If you don't make statements of facts that are not libelious or slanderous, you will be dropped.
If you are found making an opinion or insult or anything not a fact that can be proven, you will be dropped.#3 No trolling no cyber bullying, if you harass someone in this manner you will be dropped.#4 No hate speech against any group, you will be dropped.#5 Visits only to approved web sites, if you visit the wrong type of web sites as defined by our management, then you will be dropped.#6 No porno, if you access porn of any type you will be dropped.#7 Windows only, no Linux, Mac OSX, or non-Window OS will be allowed to use our Internet services.
If you are found to use a non-Windows OS you will be dropped.#8 You cannot use the Internet for pranks, jokes, humor, or anything of the funny nature or you will be dropped.
Be serious or find another ISP.#9 No proxy servers and other software and services that hide your IP address.
We consider this criminal activity and you will be dropped.#10 No P2P file sharing, as a result bandwidth will be capped to 19.2KBps, use of any more than that will be considered illegal download of copyrighted materials and you will be dropped.
Also see rule 7 no Linux ISO downloads either as we consider it illegal use of P2P networks and don't see Linux as a valid OS to use with our Internet services.P.S.
Oh by the way, spammers, scammers, get rick quick Ponzi schemes, and other stuff is allowed, as long as you use your real name and don't violate any of the other rules.P.P.S.
Oh by the way we made a deal with the NSA/CIA/FBI etc to wirelessly wiretap your Internet connection and give up data on you to the government for suspicious activity like breaking rules 1 to 7 or others.P.P.P.S.
Oh by the way this is now federal law and approved by the UN so now all ISPs will adopt these code violations.P.P.P.P.S.
If you violate any of these rules/laws or we even perceive or think you did, you will be Banned from the Internet [wikia.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286302</id>
	<title>Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2</title>
	<author>timster</author>
	<datestamp>1259695800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree, and I think it's time for the government to acknowledge the problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , and I think it 's time for the government to acknowledge the problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, and I think it's time for the government to acknowledge the problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287308</id>
	<title>Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)?</title>
	<author>dcollins</author>
	<datestamp>1259699100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"[I]t is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to[...] (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information"</p><p>I'd say this <i>is</i> pretty Pythonesque. I can't send you data until you invite me. Of course, you sending me an invitation is prohibited unless I invited you to do that. But I can't do that unless you invited me first. Etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" [ I ] t is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to [ ... ] ( b ) transmit uninvited communications , data or information " I 'd say this is pretty Pythonesque .
I ca n't send you data until you invite me .
Of course , you sending me an invitation is prohibited unless I invited you to do that .
But I ca n't do that unless you invited me first .
Etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"[I]t is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to[...] (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information"I'd say this is pretty Pythonesque.
I can't send you data until you invite me.
Of course, you sending me an invitation is prohibited unless I invited you to do that.
But I can't do that unless you invited me first.
Etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287626</id>
	<title>Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2</title>
	<author>The Ultimullet</author>
	<datestamp>1259700300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To the mirth mobile!</htmltext>
<tokenext>To the mirth mobile !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To the mirth mobile!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287706</id>
	<title>Re:Making everyone a criminal is convenient</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259700660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The more numerous the laws, the more corrupted the state.</p></div><p>Tell me about it. I keep saying UNIFY GRAVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, but nobody will listen. Physicists are so corrupt.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The more numerous the laws , the more corrupted the state.Tell me about it .
I keep saying UNIFY GRAVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS , but nobody will listen .
Physicists are so corrupt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The more numerous the laws, the more corrupted the state.Tell me about it.
I keep saying UNIFY GRAVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, but nobody will listen.
Physicists are so corrupt.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286326</id>
	<title>Hey Verizon!</title>
	<author>Average\_Joe\_Sixpack</author>
	<datestamp>1259695920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go Fu*NO CARRIER</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go Fu * NO CARRIER</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go Fu*NO CARRIER</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289320</id>
	<title>Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259664120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please link to your sources<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-D</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please link to your sources : -D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please link to your sources :-D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287296</id>
	<title>Re:Why they may have done so</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259699100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you read the whole section, it's a list of examples of what they consider to be violations of Section 1. Someone just got diarrhea of the fingers and started listing all the ways to misbehave online. They even include flaming.</p><p>The takeaway is Verizon is attempting to say that if you act out in any manner whatsoever, do anything they don't like, or just get on the wrong side of one of their IT folk, your service is dead. Overbroad is an understatement. This is them writing a blank check to themselves to allow them to do whatever they want, whenever they want.</p><blockquote><div><ol> <li>General Policy: Verizon reserves the sole discretion to deny or restrict your Service, or immediately to suspend or terminate your Service, if the use of your Service by you or anyone using it, in our sole discretion, violates the Agreement or other Verizon policies, is objectionable or unlawful, interferes with the functioning or use of the Internet or the Verizon network by Verizon or other users, or violates the terms of this Acceptable Use Policy ("AUP").</li><li>Specific Examples of AUP Violations. The following are examples of conduct which may lead to termination of your Service. Without limiting the general policy in Section 1, it is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to: (a) access without permission or right the accounts or computer systems of others, to spoof the URL, DNS or IP addresses of Verizon or any other entity, or to penetrate the security measures of Verizon or any other person's computer system, or to attempt any of the foregoing; (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information, or engage in other similar activities, including without limitation, "spamming", "flaming" or denial of service attacks; (c) intercept, interfere with or redirect email or other transmissions sent by or to others; (d) introduce viruses, worms, harmful code or Trojan horses on the Internet; (e) post off-topic information on message boards, chat rooms or social networking sites; (f) engage in conduct that is defamatory, fraudulent, obscene or deceptive; (g) violate Verizon's or any third party's copyright, trademark, proprietary or other intellectual property rights; (h) engage in any conduct harmful to the Verizon network, the Internet generally or other Internet users; (i) generate excessive amounts of email or other Internet traffic; (j) use the Service to violate any rule, policy or guideline of Verizon; (k) use the service in any fashion for the transmission or dissemination of images containing child pornography or in a manner that is obscene, sexually explicit, cruel or racist in nature or which espouses, promotes or incites bigotry, hatred or racism; or (l) use the Service in Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria or any other E:1 Country as designated by the Department of Commerce.</li></ol></div> </blockquote><p>To cover the fanfic requirement:</p><p><tt>DOOM: Repercussions of Evil</tt></p><p><tt>John Stalvern waited. The lights above him blinked and sparked out of the air. There were demons in the base. He didn't see them, but had expected them now for years. His warnings to Cernel Joson were not listenend to and now it was too late. Far too late for now, anyway.<br>John was a space marine for fourteen years. When he was young he watched the spaceships and he said to dad "I want to be on the ships daddy."<br>Dad said "No! You will BE KILL BY DEMONS"<br>There was a time when he believed him. Then as he got oldered he stopped. But now in the space station base of the UAC he knew there were demons.<br>"This is Joson" the radio crackered. "You must fight the demons!"<br>So John gotted his palsma rifle and blew up the wall.<br>"HE GOING TO KILL US" said the demons<br>"I will shoot at him" said the cyberdemon and he fired the rocket missiles. John plasmaed at him and tried to blew him up. But then the ceiling fell and they were trapped and not able to kill.<br>"No! I must kill the demons" he shouted<br>The radio said "No, John. You are the demons"<br>And then John was a zombie.</tt></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you read the whole section , it 's a list of examples of what they consider to be violations of Section 1 .
Someone just got diarrhea of the fingers and started listing all the ways to misbehave online .
They even include flaming.The takeaway is Verizon is attempting to say that if you act out in any manner whatsoever , do anything they do n't like , or just get on the wrong side of one of their IT folk , your service is dead .
Overbroad is an understatement .
This is them writing a blank check to themselves to allow them to do whatever they want , whenever they want .
General Policy : Verizon reserves the sole discretion to deny or restrict your Service , or immediately to suspend or terminate your Service , if the use of your Service by you or anyone using it , in our sole discretion , violates the Agreement or other Verizon policies , is objectionable or unlawful , interferes with the functioning or use of the Internet or the Verizon network by Verizon or other users , or violates the terms of this Acceptable Use Policy ( " AUP " ) .Specific Examples of AUP Violations .
The following are examples of conduct which may lead to termination of your Service .
Without limiting the general policy in Section 1 , it is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to : ( a ) access without permission or right the accounts or computer systems of others , to spoof the URL , DNS or IP addresses of Verizon or any other entity , or to penetrate the security measures of Verizon or any other person 's computer system , or to attempt any of the foregoing ; ( b ) transmit uninvited communications , data or information , or engage in other similar activities , including without limitation , " spamming " , " flaming " or denial of service attacks ; ( c ) intercept , interfere with or redirect email or other transmissions sent by or to others ; ( d ) introduce viruses , worms , harmful code or Trojan horses on the Internet ; ( e ) post off-topic information on message boards , chat rooms or social networking sites ; ( f ) engage in conduct that is defamatory , fraudulent , obscene or deceptive ; ( g ) violate Verizon 's or any third party 's copyright , trademark , proprietary or other intellectual property rights ; ( h ) engage in any conduct harmful to the Verizon network , the Internet generally or other Internet users ; ( i ) generate excessive amounts of email or other Internet traffic ; ( j ) use the Service to violate any rule , policy or guideline of Verizon ; ( k ) use the service in any fashion for the transmission or dissemination of images containing child pornography or in a manner that is obscene , sexually explicit , cruel or racist in nature or which espouses , promotes or incites bigotry , hatred or racism ; or ( l ) use the Service in Cuba , Iran , North Korea , Sudan and Syria or any other E : 1 Country as designated by the Department of Commerce .
To cover the fanfic requirement : DOOM : Repercussions of EvilJohn Stalvern waited .
The lights above him blinked and sparked out of the air .
There were demons in the base .
He did n't see them , but had expected them now for years .
His warnings to Cernel Joson were not listenend to and now it was too late .
Far too late for now , anyway.John was a space marine for fourteen years .
When he was young he watched the spaceships and he said to dad " I want to be on the ships daddy .
" Dad said " No !
You will BE KILL BY DEMONS " There was a time when he believed him .
Then as he got oldered he stopped .
But now in the space station base of the UAC he knew there were demons .
" This is Joson " the radio crackered .
" You must fight the demons !
" So John gotted his palsma rifle and blew up the wall .
" HE GOING TO KILL US " said the demons " I will shoot at him " said the cyberdemon and he fired the rocket missiles .
John plasmaed at him and tried to blew him up .
But then the ceiling fell and they were trapped and not able to kill. " No !
I must kill the demons " he shoutedThe radio said " No , John .
You are the demons " And then John was a zombie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you read the whole section, it's a list of examples of what they consider to be violations of Section 1.
Someone just got diarrhea of the fingers and started listing all the ways to misbehave online.
They even include flaming.The takeaway is Verizon is attempting to say that if you act out in any manner whatsoever, do anything they don't like, or just get on the wrong side of one of their IT folk, your service is dead.
Overbroad is an understatement.
This is them writing a blank check to themselves to allow them to do whatever they want, whenever they want.
General Policy: Verizon reserves the sole discretion to deny or restrict your Service, or immediately to suspend or terminate your Service, if the use of your Service by you or anyone using it, in our sole discretion, violates the Agreement or other Verizon policies, is objectionable or unlawful, interferes with the functioning or use of the Internet or the Verizon network by Verizon or other users, or violates the terms of this Acceptable Use Policy ("AUP").Specific Examples of AUP Violations.
The following are examples of conduct which may lead to termination of your Service.
Without limiting the general policy in Section 1, it is a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to: (a) access without permission or right the accounts or computer systems of others, to spoof the URL, DNS or IP addresses of Verizon or any other entity, or to penetrate the security measures of Verizon or any other person's computer system, or to attempt any of the foregoing; (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or information, or engage in other similar activities, including without limitation, "spamming", "flaming" or denial of service attacks; (c) intercept, interfere with or redirect email or other transmissions sent by or to others; (d) introduce viruses, worms, harmful code or Trojan horses on the Internet; (e) post off-topic information on message boards, chat rooms or social networking sites; (f) engage in conduct that is defamatory, fraudulent, obscene or deceptive; (g) violate Verizon's or any third party's copyright, trademark, proprietary or other intellectual property rights; (h) engage in any conduct harmful to the Verizon network, the Internet generally or other Internet users; (i) generate excessive amounts of email or other Internet traffic; (j) use the Service to violate any rule, policy or guideline of Verizon; (k) use the service in any fashion for the transmission or dissemination of images containing child pornography or in a manner that is obscene, sexually explicit, cruel or racist in nature or which espouses, promotes or incites bigotry, hatred or racism; or (l) use the Service in Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria or any other E:1 Country as designated by the Department of Commerce.
To cover the fanfic requirement:DOOM: Repercussions of EvilJohn Stalvern waited.
The lights above him blinked and sparked out of the air.
There were demons in the base.
He didn't see them, but had expected them now for years.
His warnings to Cernel Joson were not listenend to and now it was too late.
Far too late for now, anyway.John was a space marine for fourteen years.
When he was young he watched the spaceships and he said to dad "I want to be on the ships daddy.
"Dad said "No!
You will BE KILL BY DEMONS"There was a time when he believed him.
Then as he got oldered he stopped.
But now in the space station base of the UAC he knew there were demons.
"This is Joson" the radio crackered.
"You must fight the demons!
"So John gotted his palsma rifle and blew up the wall.
"HE GOING TO KILL US" said the demons"I will shoot at him" said the cyberdemon and he fired the rocket missiles.
John plasmaed at him and tried to blew him up.
But then the ceiling fell and they were trapped and not able to kill."No!
I must kill the demons" he shoutedThe radio said "No, John.
You are the demons"And then John was a zombie.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286550</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>The Archon V2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1259696640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>do i even need to bring up the constitution here?  free speech anyone?</p></div><p>Since it's a corporation, it's not bound by the First Amendment.</p><p>

Hey, wait, that means bringing up the Constitution is off topic.</p><p>

Very good.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>do i even need to bring up the constitution here ?
free speech anyone ? Since it 's a corporation , it 's not bound by the First Amendment .
Hey , wait , that means bringing up the Constitution is off topic .
Very good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>do i even need to bring up the constitution here?
free speech anyone?Since it's a corporation, it's not bound by the First Amendment.
Hey, wait, that means bringing up the Constitution is off topic.
Very good.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289656</id>
	<title>Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2</title>
	<author>ysth</author>
	<datestamp>1259665440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"An Inconvienient Place: About 70 Miles East of Here, Where It's Lighter"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" An Inconvienient Place : About 70 Miles East of Here , Where It 's Lighter "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"An Inconvienient Place: About 70 Miles East of Here, Where It's Lighter"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30292074</id>
	<title>me too!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259677320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cat got your tongue? (something important seems to be missing from your comment<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... like the body or the subject!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cat got your tongue ?
( something important seems to be missing from your comment ... like the body or the subject !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cat got your tongue?
(something important seems to be missing from your comment ... like the body or the subject!
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286946</id>
	<title>Re:I'm Not!</title>
	<author>Chris Mattern</author>
	<datestamp>1259697960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I think I'll be the first one to stay ON TOPIC!!!</p></div></blockquote><p>Stay on topic, Red Five, stay on topic.  Almost there...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I 'll be the first one to stay ON TOPIC ! !
! Stay on topic , Red Five , stay on topic .
Almost there.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I'll be the first one to stay ON TOPIC!!
!Stay on topic, Red Five, stay on topic.
Almost there...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286660</id>
	<title>Re:I'm Not!</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1259697060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wuold suspect the medssage board admin just need to complain about you to verizon... and all the implies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wuold suspect the medssage board admin just need to complain about you to verizon... and all the implies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wuold suspect the medssage board admin just need to complain about you to verizon... and all the implies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30293028</id>
	<title>Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)?</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1259684400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; According to the letter of their AUP...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...they can terminate your service for any reason or none.  Consequently, all the examples in the AUP are just that: examples.  They could and should reduce the damn thing to a single sentence: "We can terminate service at any time without notice."  You, of course, can do likewise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; According to the letter of their AUP... ...they can terminate your service for any reason or none .
Consequently , all the examples in the AUP are just that : examples .
They could and should reduce the damn thing to a single sentence : " We can terminate service at any time without notice .
" You , of course , can do likewise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; According to the letter of their AUP... ...they can terminate your service for any reason or none.
Consequently, all the examples in the AUP are just that: examples.
They could and should reduce the damn thing to a single sentence: "We can terminate service at any time without notice.
"  You, of course, can do likewise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287200</id>
	<title>Socrates and Plato</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1259698740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Two old Greek guys and three Romans are sitting at a bakery drinking coffee and eating kabobs when Socrates and Plato walk by discussing the nature of "The State".</p><p>The first old Greek guys comments to Socrates "You know I once read a book that said a soverign rules by divine mandate."</p><p>Socrates smacks him across the face and pisses in his coffee. "YOu have been modded -1 Offtopic.</p><p>His second friend gets up intent on beating the remaining piss out of Socrates but Plato does a "Solar Flare Tsunami" blast to his face.</p><p>The three remaining Romans go to Plato and ask, "Why did you do such horrible things when they mearly wanted to comment on "The State" and join your discussion?"</p><p>Socrates whispered in reply, "We were talking about the state of Mrs. Plato's assets, not the government and off-topic discussion must BE PUNISHED!"</p><p>Which at that point Socrates and Plato performed the fusion dance and obliterated Atlantis just to show how serious they were about moderating off-topic discussion when a passing Spartan kicked them both off a cliff stating, "This Is Not SPARTA!"</p><p>Fin</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Two old Greek guys and three Romans are sitting at a bakery drinking coffee and eating kabobs when Socrates and Plato walk by discussing the nature of " The State " .The first old Greek guys comments to Socrates " You know I once read a book that said a soverign rules by divine mandate .
" Socrates smacks him across the face and pisses in his coffee .
" YOu have been modded -1 Offtopic.His second friend gets up intent on beating the remaining piss out of Socrates but Plato does a " Solar Flare Tsunami " blast to his face.The three remaining Romans go to Plato and ask , " Why did you do such horrible things when they mearly wanted to comment on " The State " and join your discussion ?
" Socrates whispered in reply , " We were talking about the state of Mrs. Plato 's assets , not the government and off-topic discussion must BE PUNISHED !
" Which at that point Socrates and Plato performed the fusion dance and obliterated Atlantis just to show how serious they were about moderating off-topic discussion when a passing Spartan kicked them both off a cliff stating , " This Is Not SPARTA !
" Fin</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two old Greek guys and three Romans are sitting at a bakery drinking coffee and eating kabobs when Socrates and Plato walk by discussing the nature of "The State".The first old Greek guys comments to Socrates "You know I once read a book that said a soverign rules by divine mandate.
"Socrates smacks him across the face and pisses in his coffee.
"YOu have been modded -1 Offtopic.His second friend gets up intent on beating the remaining piss out of Socrates but Plato does a "Solar Flare Tsunami" blast to his face.The three remaining Romans go to Plato and ask, "Why did you do such horrible things when they mearly wanted to comment on "The State" and join your discussion?
"Socrates whispered in reply, "We were talking about the state of Mrs. Plato's assets, not the government and off-topic discussion must BE PUNISHED!
"Which at that point Socrates and Plato performed the fusion dance and obliterated Atlantis just to show how serious they were about moderating off-topic discussion when a passing Spartan kicked them both off a cliff stating, "This Is Not SPARTA!
"Fin</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287382</id>
	<title>Re:Forget (e) offtopic, how about (b)?</title>
	<author>thomasdz</author>
	<datestamp>1259699400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><blockquote><div><p> <strong>Prohibited:</strong><br>1. Users named other than "Thomas".<br>2. Users named "Thomas".</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Huh?  (head explodes)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Prohibited : 1 .
Users named other than " Thomas " .2 .
Users named " Thomas " .Huh ?
( head explodes )</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Prohibited:1.
Users named other than "Thomas".2.
Users named "Thomas".Huh?
(head explodes)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287058</id>
	<title>cloud</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>when your dad found a cloud my computer crashed</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>when your dad found a cloud my computer crashed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when your dad found a cloud my computer crashed</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287816</id>
	<title>Re:My first hand experience on Modern Warfare 2</title>
	<author>fluch</author>
	<datestamp>1259701020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And why does the ABOVE reply get modded offtopic whereas all the other offtopic replies get modded interesting, insigtful and funny? If something is offtopic in this thread, then it is my post now!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And why does the ABOVE reply get modded offtopic whereas all the other offtopic replies get modded interesting , insigtful and funny ?
If something is offtopic in this thread , then it is my post now !
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And why does the ABOVE reply get modded offtopic whereas all the other offtopic replies get modded interesting, insigtful and funny?
If something is offtopic in this thread, then it is my post now!
;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287044</id>
	<title>Re:Offtopic?</title>
	<author>captainClassLoader</author>
	<datestamp>1259698260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The short answer to your question?: Han shot first.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The short answer to your question ?
: Han shot first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The short answer to your question?
: Han shot first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287224</id>
	<title>so there can be -1 offtopic to this article right?</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1259698800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Slashdot  -1, Offtopic moderation to be changed to:  -1 Offtopic (disconnect author from internet)
</p><p>
Frankly, Verizon has gotten it wrong though.
They should be disconnecting trolls... OTOH.. maybe they are trolls<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)
</p><p>
From UUnet.. historical biggest spam haven ever...  to 2009 keeping a clean ship, don't even <b>think</b> of posting an off-topic web page...
</p><p>
Any anti-verizon web pages, or postings are by definition off-topic  (even if Verizon is the subject of the discussion).
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot -1 , Offtopic moderation to be changed to : -1 Offtopic ( disconnect author from internet ) Frankly , Verizon has gotten it wrong though .
They should be disconnecting trolls... OTOH.. maybe they are trolls : ) From UUnet.. historical biggest spam haven ever... to 2009 keeping a clean ship , do n't even think of posting an off-topic web page.. . Any anti-verizon web pages , or postings are by definition off-topic ( even if Verizon is the subject of the discussion ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Slashdot  -1, Offtopic moderation to be changed to:  -1 Offtopic (disconnect author from internet)

Frankly, Verizon has gotten it wrong though.
They should be disconnecting trolls... OTOH.. maybe they are trolls :)

From UUnet.. historical biggest spam haven ever...  to 2009 keeping a clean ship, don't even think of posting an off-topic web page...

Any anti-verizon web pages, or postings are by definition off-topic  (even if Verizon is the subject of the discussion).
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287110</id>
	<title>Re:Restraint Of Free Speech</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, the moment they change the terms of service, the original contract is NULL and VOID. They changed the terms, now you can re-negotiate the payment.</p><p>Just send them a email saying "I accept the New AUP terms and agree to adjust my payment to $0 immediately for the duration of this change in service level. Receiving this email constitutes acceptance of the new terms by both parties."</p><p>If they can change the terms arbitrarily, then so can you. Make it hurt. Stupid should hurt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the moment they change the terms of service , the original contract is NULL and VOID .
They changed the terms , now you can re-negotiate the payment.Just send them a email saying " I accept the New AUP terms and agree to adjust my payment to $ 0 immediately for the duration of this change in service level .
Receiving this email constitutes acceptance of the new terms by both parties .
" If they can change the terms arbitrarily , then so can you .
Make it hurt .
Stupid should hurt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the moment they change the terms of service, the original contract is NULL and VOID.
They changed the terms, now you can re-negotiate the payment.Just send them a email saying "I accept the New AUP terms and agree to adjust my payment to $0 immediately for the duration of this change in service level.
Receiving this email constitutes acceptance of the new terms by both parties.
"If they can change the terms arbitrarily, then so can you.
Make it hurt.
Stupid should hurt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289172</id>
	<title>Re:I'm Not!</title>
	<author>Tibia1</author>
	<datestamp>1259663460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just because your parents are reading your text messages doesn't mean you should complain about it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just because your parents are reading your text messages does n't mean you should complain about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just because your parents are reading your text messages doesn't mean you should complain about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286482</id>
	<title>This is bad news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259696400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for the 'hot grits' industry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for the 'hot grits ' industry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for the 'hot grits' industry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290170</id>
	<title>If you get FIOS, there'll be Cake!</title>
	<author>billstewart</author>
	<datestamp>1259667600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See section (f), above, and you can have some cake!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>See section ( f ) , above , and you can have some cake !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See section (f), above, and you can have some cake!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287296</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30293198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286512
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288864
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30297560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30294016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30293028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287276
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30293174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30291400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287902
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288898
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30293602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30291540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30295060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30293754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288204
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286672
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30292890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30298340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30292614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1743252_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287438
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288220
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286824
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287246
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287418
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30293174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287156
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287894
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289090
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286352
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286850
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287322
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288056
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289172
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286550
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286866
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287376
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287902
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287222
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288106
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288078
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287288
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289546
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287848
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287334
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289592
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288420
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286418
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287456
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288462
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286392
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286686
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287386
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286310
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290080
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30297560
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286446
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286816
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287974
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286658
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30292614
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30294016
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30298340
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30293602
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289116
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290480
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287590
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287198
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289256
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287304
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287296
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290918
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30291540
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290218
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30295060
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290170
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287510
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287248
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286540
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287816
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288204
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286302
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287680
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286476
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287626
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288912
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287060
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287790
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289320
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288898
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288734
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289296
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286636
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30292890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30293028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30293198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30289650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287308
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287818
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286872
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286950
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287110
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286918
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30291400
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287580
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30293754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286884
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30288614
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286524
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286744
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287734
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286854
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30286314
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30287464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1743252.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1743252.30290486
</commentlist>
</conversation>
