<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_01_1725249</id>
	<title>Microsoft Investigates Windows 7 "Black Screen of Death"</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1259689080000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:dug@@@frag...co...uk" rel="nofollow">duguk</a> writes <i>"Microsoft has confirmed that it is investigating a problem described as the '<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8388253.stm">black screen of death</a>,' which affects Windows 7 &mdash; and reports suggest it affects Vista and XP, too. The firm said it was looking into reports that suggest its latest security update, released on Tuesday 25 November, caused the problem. The error means that users of Windows 7 and earlier operating systems see a totally black screen after logging on to the system."</i> <b>Update: 12/01 22:35 GMT</b> by <b> <a href="http://slashdot.org/~kdawson/">KD</a> </b>: Microsoft now says that its <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9141637/Microsoft\_denies\_blame\_for\_black\_screens\_of\_death\_">November Windows updates are not causing the BlackSOD</a>: "The company has found those reports to be inaccurate and our comprehensive investigation has shown that none of the recently released updates are related to the behavior described in the reports."</htmltext>
<tokenext>duguk writes " Microsoft has confirmed that it is investigating a problem described as the 'black screen of death, ' which affects Windows 7    and reports suggest it affects Vista and XP , too .
The firm said it was looking into reports that suggest its latest security update , released on Tuesday 25 November , caused the problem .
The error means that users of Windows 7 and earlier operating systems see a totally black screen after logging on to the system .
" Update : 12/01 22 : 35 GMT by KD : Microsoft now says that its November Windows updates are not causing the BlackSOD : " The company has found those reports to be inaccurate and our comprehensive investigation has shown that none of the recently released updates are related to the behavior described in the reports .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>duguk writes "Microsoft has confirmed that it is investigating a problem described as the 'black screen of death,' which affects Windows 7 — and reports suggest it affects Vista and XP, too.
The firm said it was looking into reports that suggest its latest security update, released on Tuesday 25 November, caused the problem.
The error means that users of Windows 7 and earlier operating systems see a totally black screen after logging on to the system.
" Update: 12/01 22:35 GMT by  KD : Microsoft now says that its November Windows updates are not causing the BlackSOD: "The company has found those reports to be inaccurate and our comprehensive investigation has shown that none of the recently released updates are related to the behavior described in the reports.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286478</id>
	<title>Freeze-Up After Login</title>
	<author>ProzacPatient</author>
	<datestamp>1259696400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>After logging in yesterday on Windows 7 everything appeared to be going as normally but all I got was the standard blue desktop and Explorer never started, but I fixed it with a reboot.<br>
I wonder if it had anything to do with this particular bug.</htmltext>
<tokenext>After logging in yesterday on Windows 7 everything appeared to be going as normally but all I got was the standard blue desktop and Explorer never started , but I fixed it with a reboot .
I wonder if it had anything to do with this particular bug .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After logging in yesterday on Windows 7 everything appeared to be going as normally but all I got was the standard blue desktop and Explorer never started, but I fixed it with a reboot.
I wonder if it had anything to do with this particular bug.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287532</id>
	<title>Re:Can confirm the issue from personal experience</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259699940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was wondering why my XP VMs were acting funky this week. As GP said, a reboot seems to bring it back to normal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was wondering why my XP VMs were acting funky this week .
As GP said , a reboot seems to bring it back to normal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was wondering why my XP VMs were acting funky this week.
As GP said, a reboot seems to bring it back to normal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287306</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>melikamp</author>
	<datestamp>1259699100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Easy, mon amie. I run 7 virtualized inside Emacs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Easy , mon amie .
I run 7 virtualized inside Emacs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Easy, mon amie.
I run 7 virtualized inside Emacs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288470</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259660400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Welcome to the botnet. Lots of malware pushes its way into the computer with no interaction whatever (unfirewalled or open ports, malware injected into websites without the webmaster's knowledge, cross-site scripting attacks, infections through chat programs, etc.) I've had kids' computers infected with malware (like Conficker) through thumbdrives. Get a real-time antivirus, keep it updated, install a free software firewall (like Comodo or ZoneAlarm), or better yet a hardware firewall, and install anti-spyware like Ad-Aware or Spybot S&amp;D, and do a complete scan on occasion with another on-demand scanner like ClamWin. Spammers and botnets are making most of their money by infecting clowns that don't think "viruses won't get me, I don't surf warez sites."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcome to the botnet .
Lots of malware pushes its way into the computer with no interaction whatever ( unfirewalled or open ports , malware injected into websites without the webmaster 's knowledge , cross-site scripting attacks , infections through chat programs , etc .
) I 've had kids ' computers infected with malware ( like Conficker ) through thumbdrives .
Get a real-time antivirus , keep it updated , install a free software firewall ( like Comodo or ZoneAlarm ) , or better yet a hardware firewall , and install anti-spyware like Ad-Aware or Spybot S&amp;D , and do a complete scan on occasion with another on-demand scanner like ClamWin .
Spammers and botnets are making most of their money by infecting clowns that do n't think " viruses wo n't get me , I do n't surf warez sites .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Welcome to the botnet.
Lots of malware pushes its way into the computer with no interaction whatever (unfirewalled or open ports, malware injected into websites without the webmaster's knowledge, cross-site scripting attacks, infections through chat programs, etc.
) I've had kids' computers infected with malware (like Conficker) through thumbdrives.
Get a real-time antivirus, keep it updated, install a free software firewall (like Comodo or ZoneAlarm), or better yet a hardware firewall, and install anti-spyware like Ad-Aware or Spybot S&amp;D, and do a complete scan on occasion with another on-demand scanner like ClamWin.
Spammers and botnets are making most of their money by infecting clowns that don't think "viruses won't get me, I don't surf warez sites.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30295158</id>
	<title>Re:Had this myself.. not a showstopper</title>
	<author>gencha</author>
	<datestamp>1259577900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How does it matter how much RAM you got?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How does it matter how much RAM you got ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does it matter how much RAM you got?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285606</id>
	<title>How much more black can it be?  None more black.</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1259693400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess a bunch of people were sitting around at Microsoft after watching Spinal Tap and decided to do a tribute patch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess a bunch of people were sitting around at Microsoft after watching Spinal Tap and decided to do a tribute patch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess a bunch of people were sitting around at Microsoft after watching Spinal Tap and decided to do a tribute patch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287648</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>Lord Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1259700360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You think a firewall is the only layer of security you need??? I hope you don't work in IT! Viruses commonly come in via email, IM, usb drive, file-sharing, and web use. Firewalls do nothing to protect from these common vectors.</p><p>If you use Windows to do anything other than play Minesweeper, patch your shit, run a firewall, run AV, and think before you click!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You think a firewall is the only layer of security you need ? ? ?
I hope you do n't work in IT !
Viruses commonly come in via email , IM , usb drive , file-sharing , and web use .
Firewalls do nothing to protect from these common vectors.If you use Windows to do anything other than play Minesweeper , patch your shit , run a firewall , run AV , and think before you click !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You think a firewall is the only layer of security you need???
I hope you don't work in IT!
Viruses commonly come in via email, IM, usb drive, file-sharing, and web use.
Firewalls do nothing to protect from these common vectors.If you use Windows to do anything other than play Minesweeper, patch your shit, run a firewall, run AV, and think before you click!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30291198</id>
	<title>KSOD</title>
	<author>Vyse of Arcadia</author>
	<datestamp>1259672400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If we follow the convention set by CMYK (Cyan Magenta Yellow blacK), it should really be KSOD.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If we follow the convention set by CMYK ( Cyan Magenta Yellow blacK ) , it should really be KSOD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If we follow the convention set by CMYK (Cyan Magenta Yellow blacK), it should really be KSOD.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287070</id>
	<title>Re:Henry Gates Ford:</title>
	<author>Gavin Scott</author>
	<datestamp>1259698380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With Linux you can have any color screen of death that you want.</p><p>G.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With Linux you can have any color screen of death that you want.G .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With Linux you can have any color screen of death that you want.G.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286970</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>omgwtfroflbbqwasd</author>
	<datestamp>1259698020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>yeah, cause, you know, there aren't any client-side vulnerabilities for any Windows apps.  All Windows attacks only target 135/139/445.</htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah , cause , you know , there are n't any client-side vulnerabilities for any Windows apps .
All Windows attacks only target 135/139/445 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah, cause, you know, there aren't any client-side vulnerabilities for any Windows apps.
All Windows attacks only target 135/139/445.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30322348</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>eknagy</author>
	<datestamp>1259928360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1000*700 pixels? Dude, you have a weird display...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1000 * 700 pixels ?
Dude , you have a weird display.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1000*700 pixels?
Dude, you have a weird display...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287872</id>
	<title>Re:Can confirm the issue from personal experience</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259658060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see the problem. Just reboot, start in runlevel 1 and restore your user profile (gnome,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.bash\_profile etc) from a snapshot</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see the problem .
Just reboot , start in runlevel 1 and restore your user profile ( gnome , .bash \ _profile etc ) from a snapshot</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see the problem.
Just reboot, start in runlevel 1 and restore your user profile (gnome, .bash\_profile etc) from a snapshot</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286832</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259697540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Properly fire walling any MS OS will prevent all the external security problems in MS OS's.<br>That's not a problem.</p><p>Corporate security updates are in place to protect the system from it's USERS.</p><p>"I also hope you've never fixed your car or a leaky faucet..</p><p>Because that would make you a hypocrite."</p><p>No it doesn't, however the example shows you aren't very capable of logical thinking.</p><p>Name me on outside exploit that can't be stopped with a properly implemented firewall.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Properly fire walling any MS OS will prevent all the external security problems in MS OS 's.That 's not a problem.Corporate security updates are in place to protect the system from it 's USERS .
" I also hope you 've never fixed your car or a leaky faucet..Because that would make you a hypocrite .
" No it does n't , however the example shows you are n't very capable of logical thinking.Name me on outside exploit that ca n't be stopped with a properly implemented firewall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Properly fire walling any MS OS will prevent all the external security problems in MS OS's.That's not a problem.Corporate security updates are in place to protect the system from it's USERS.
"I also hope you've never fixed your car or a leaky faucet..Because that would make you a hypocrite.
"No it doesn't, however the example shows you aren't very capable of logical thinking.Name me on outside exploit that can't be stopped with a properly implemented firewall.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285444</id>
	<title>Problem Solved!</title>
	<author>bravo\_2\_0</author>
	<datestamp>1259692800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Turns out it was just affecting a bunch of old people who kept forgetting to turn their monitors on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Turns out it was just affecting a bunch of old people who kept forgetting to turn their monitors on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Turns out it was just affecting a bunch of old people who kept forgetting to turn their monitors on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30296496</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>sergueyz</author>
	<datestamp>1259592060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazimir\_Malevich" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">1915's concept</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>1915 's concept [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1915's concept [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30293788</id>
	<title>Translation of Microsoft's Official Denial</title>
	<author>Helldesk Hound</author>
	<datestamp>1259691300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Microsoft now says that its November Windows updates are not causing<br>&gt; the BlackSOD: "The company has found those reports to be inaccurate<br>&gt; and our comprehensive investigation has shown that none of the recently<br>&gt; released updates are related to the behavior described in the reports."</p><p>"We know those reports are inaccurate because we already knew about this before releasing the November updates and so it couldn't possibly be related to the November updates. It is an issue that we are having considerable difficulties fixing hence not being fixed in the November updates and hoped that nobody would have commented about it so soon."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Microsoft now says that its November Windows updates are not causing &gt; the BlackSOD : " The company has found those reports to be inaccurate &gt; and our comprehensive investigation has shown that none of the recently &gt; released updates are related to the behavior described in the reports .
" " We know those reports are inaccurate because we already knew about this before releasing the November updates and so it could n't possibly be related to the November updates .
It is an issue that we are having considerable difficulties fixing hence not being fixed in the November updates and hoped that nobody would have commented about it so soon .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Microsoft now says that its November Windows updates are not causing&gt; the BlackSOD: "The company has found those reports to be inaccurate&gt; and our comprehensive investigation has shown that none of the recently&gt; released updates are related to the behavior described in the reports.
""We know those reports are inaccurate because we already knew about this before releasing the November updates and so it couldn't possibly be related to the November updates.
It is an issue that we are having considerable difficulties fixing hence not being fixed in the November updates and hoped that nobody would have commented about it so soon.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288560</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>indre1</author>
	<datestamp>1259660820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do Macs have white screen?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do Macs have white screen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do Macs have white screen?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287800</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>rock\_climbing\_guy</author>
	<datestamp>1259700960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>windowsPC.count = 0</htmltext>
<tokenext>windowsPC.count = 0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>windowsPC.count = 0</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289916</id>
	<title>Innovative</title>
	<author>undecim</author>
	<datestamp>1259666400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think this is a great example of creativity. Microsoft managed to completely change up the dated blue screen, while keeping the acronym that we all know and love from becoming obsolete.

Though I do suppose that the text should be a different color than the background...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this is a great example of creativity .
Microsoft managed to completely change up the dated blue screen , while keeping the acronym that we all know and love from becoming obsolete .
Though I do suppose that the text should be a different color than the background.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this is a great example of creativity.
Microsoft managed to completely change up the dated blue screen, while keeping the acronym that we all know and love from becoming obsolete.
Though I do suppose that the text should be a different color than the background...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288870</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259661960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People like you give IT a really, really bad name.</p><p>Securing windows is actually not that hard since XP/SP2, but I suppose you haven't left your mother's basement since then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People like you give IT a really , really bad name.Securing windows is actually not that hard since XP/SP2 , but I suppose you have n't left your mother 's basement since then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People like you give IT a really, really bad name.Securing windows is actually not that hard since XP/SP2, but I suppose you haven't left your mother's basement since then.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30290370</id>
	<title>bleed</title>
	<author>mebrahim</author>
	<datestamp>1259668500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>BLack scrEEn of Death</htmltext>
<tokenext>BLack scrEEn of Death</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BLack scrEEn of Death</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30292958</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259683680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to be difficult, but I agree with the parent.  I've been in IT 10 years, and run my own domain and associated services from my house on a Debian box, and I have never used a virus scanner on my WinXP box.  Have you even used Norton lately?  No wonder everyone needs quad cores.  Talk about bloat.</p><p>And from what I gather, they're not even that effective anyways.</p><p>To address:</p><p>"Viruses commonly come in via..."</p><p>email</p><p>Not through gmail.  My mail server uses ClamAV, but Thunderbird doesn't run attachments anyways, so where's the danger?  I don't even remember an attachment making its way to Thunderbird in awhile.</p><p>IM</p><p>News to me.  Gtalk only sends ASCII to my phone and/or firefox gmail sessions.  I know it's possible, but I've never seen it, or would be dumb enough to run files that I wasn't expecting.</p><p>usb drive</p><p>I don't insert usb drives into unknown computers and then plug it into my home computers.  Besides, auto run is disabled on all removable media.  Does that still stop it?  Probably not, but I haven't seen it.</p><p>file-sharing</p><p>Not bloody likely if it has hundreds or thousands of seeders, and its even easier to check for executable content in movies/mp3s.</p><p>and web use</p><p>Never gotten a virus or even seen one through Firefox.  Sure it's possible, but I'm not bothered enough to install AVG or Norton.</p><p>Basically, it's entirely possible to be anti-virus free for years and years at a time.  I guess if I needed live scanning of every file the hard drive is reading/writing to/from, I'd need a faster HDD and a quad core as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to be difficult , but I agree with the parent .
I 've been in IT 10 years , and run my own domain and associated services from my house on a Debian box , and I have never used a virus scanner on my WinXP box .
Have you even used Norton lately ?
No wonder everyone needs quad cores .
Talk about bloat.And from what I gather , they 're not even that effective anyways.To address : " Viruses commonly come in via... " emailNot through gmail .
My mail server uses ClamAV , but Thunderbird does n't run attachments anyways , so where 's the danger ?
I do n't even remember an attachment making its way to Thunderbird in awhile.IMNews to me .
Gtalk only sends ASCII to my phone and/or firefox gmail sessions .
I know it 's possible , but I 've never seen it , or would be dumb enough to run files that I was n't expecting.usb driveI do n't insert usb drives into unknown computers and then plug it into my home computers .
Besides , auto run is disabled on all removable media .
Does that still stop it ?
Probably not , but I have n't seen it.file-sharingNot bloody likely if it has hundreds or thousands of seeders , and its even easier to check for executable content in movies/mp3s.and web useNever gotten a virus or even seen one through Firefox .
Sure it 's possible , but I 'm not bothered enough to install AVG or Norton.Basically , it 's entirely possible to be anti-virus free for years and years at a time .
I guess if I needed live scanning of every file the hard drive is reading/writing to/from , I 'd need a faster HDD and a quad core as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to be difficult, but I agree with the parent.
I've been in IT 10 years, and run my own domain and associated services from my house on a Debian box, and I have never used a virus scanner on my WinXP box.
Have you even used Norton lately?
No wonder everyone needs quad cores.
Talk about bloat.And from what I gather, they're not even that effective anyways.To address:"Viruses commonly come in via..."emailNot through gmail.
My mail server uses ClamAV, but Thunderbird doesn't run attachments anyways, so where's the danger?
I don't even remember an attachment making its way to Thunderbird in awhile.IMNews to me.
Gtalk only sends ASCII to my phone and/or firefox gmail sessions.
I know it's possible, but I've never seen it, or would be dumb enough to run files that I wasn't expecting.usb driveI don't insert usb drives into unknown computers and then plug it into my home computers.
Besides, auto run is disabled on all removable media.
Does that still stop it?
Probably not, but I haven't seen it.file-sharingNot bloody likely if it has hundreds or thousands of seeders, and its even easier to check for executable content in movies/mp3s.and web useNever gotten a virus or even seen one through Firefox.
Sure it's possible, but I'm not bothered enough to install AVG or Norton.Basically, it's entirely possible to be anti-virus free for years and years at a time.
I guess if I needed live scanning of every file the hard drive is reading/writing to/from, I'd need a faster HDD and a quad core as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288274</id>
	<title>My upgrade is done</title>
	<author>hwyhobo</author>
	<datestamp>1259659620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Okay, I just changed the background on my Windows XP to black and removed all the icons. Now I can sit and stare at the screen. No need to upgrade anymore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , I just changed the background on my Windows XP to black and removed all the icons .
Now I can sit and stare at the screen .
No need to upgrade anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, I just changed the background on my Windows XP to black and removed all the icons.
Now I can sit and stare at the screen.
No need to upgrade anymore.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287598</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259700120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't be so such an asshole.  Have you ever heard of not fixing what's not broken?</p><p>The post is to just saying his system works perfectly well for his needs without any patches.</p><p>Almost a pointless post in this discussion, except for saying that some fixes can also break things.  Just like if you change a light bulb in your house that's not broken in an annoying way, you take a slight risk of burning down the house for no benefits.  That's how it is for him because the computer is secured with firewalls and stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't be so such an asshole .
Have you ever heard of not fixing what 's not broken ? The post is to just saying his system works perfectly well for his needs without any patches.Almost a pointless post in this discussion , except for saying that some fixes can also break things .
Just like if you change a light bulb in your house that 's not broken in an annoying way , you take a slight risk of burning down the house for no benefits .
That 's how it is for him because the computer is secured with firewalls and stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't be so such an asshole.
Have you ever heard of not fixing what's not broken?The post is to just saying his system works perfectly well for his needs without any patches.Almost a pointless post in this discussion, except for saying that some fixes can also break things.
Just like if you change a light bulb in your house that's not broken in an annoying way, you take a slight risk of burning down the house for no benefits.
That's how it is for him because the computer is secured with firewalls and stuff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287528</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259699940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That'd be Windows XP.  And a properly firewalled system, used thoughtfully, is pretty much as safe as anything.  The problem usually isn't the software, but the user these days.  Clicking on bad email attachments, surfing to the wrong sites, all while using Administrator rights...that's the problem.  I haven't seen a virus be able to automatically jump from computer to computer since about 2001.</p><p>That being said, the reason we have updates is so we can make mistakes and not pay for them with our data.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 'd be Windows XP .
And a properly firewalled system , used thoughtfully , is pretty much as safe as anything .
The problem usually is n't the software , but the user these days .
Clicking on bad email attachments , surfing to the wrong sites , all while using Administrator rights...that 's the problem .
I have n't seen a virus be able to automatically jump from computer to computer since about 2001.That being said , the reason we have updates is so we can make mistakes and not pay for them with our data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That'd be Windows XP.
And a properly firewalled system, used thoughtfully, is pretty much as safe as anything.
The problem usually isn't the software, but the user these days.
Clicking on bad email attachments, surfing to the wrong sites, all while using Administrator rights...that's the problem.
I haven't seen a virus be able to automatically jump from computer to computer since about 2001.That being said, the reason we have updates is so we can make mistakes and not pay for them with our data.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286170</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>ElSupreme</author>
	<datestamp>1259695380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>2^5 = 32<br>
<br>
Still not that many though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>2 ^ 5 = 32 Still not that many though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2^5 = 32

Still not that many though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30292152</id>
	<title>Re:patches may make Win 7 not genuine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259677860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That was the problem- he said he did a custom install which is the fancy name Microsoft gave to "move your stuff aside and then clean install without deleting anything"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was the problem- he said he did a custom install which is the fancy name Microsoft gave to " move your stuff aside and then clean install without deleting anything "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was the problem- he said he did a custom install which is the fancy name Microsoft gave to "move your stuff aside and then clean install without deleting anything"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287768</id>
	<title>I had this happen on a WinXP Pro PC a few days ago</title>
	<author>HouseOfMisterE</author>
	<datestamp>1259700840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had this happen on my personal PC with Windows XP Pro a few days ago.  I had been using the PC for a while and needed a break, so I locked the screen saver and stepped away.  I came back later and the screen was black like power management had kicked in, but I don't have Windows configured to turn off the display.  I moved the mouse but got no response.  I run VNC server on this PC, so I used another PC to attempt a connection.  The connection was successful, but the display was corrupt and basically unusable.  I was able to navigate the PC's "Start" menu via the VNC session and shut the PC down.  After a reboot, the PC worked properly and I haven't had this happen again.</p><p>I suppose it could have been some sort of problem with the display driver, but this PC NEVER crashes or locks up and this was definitely an unexpected occurrence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had this happen on my personal PC with Windows XP Pro a few days ago .
I had been using the PC for a while and needed a break , so I locked the screen saver and stepped away .
I came back later and the screen was black like power management had kicked in , but I do n't have Windows configured to turn off the display .
I moved the mouse but got no response .
I run VNC server on this PC , so I used another PC to attempt a connection .
The connection was successful , but the display was corrupt and basically unusable .
I was able to navigate the PC 's " Start " menu via the VNC session and shut the PC down .
After a reboot , the PC worked properly and I have n't had this happen again.I suppose it could have been some sort of problem with the display driver , but this PC NEVER crashes or locks up and this was definitely an unexpected occurrence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had this happen on my personal PC with Windows XP Pro a few days ago.
I had been using the PC for a while and needed a break, so I locked the screen saver and stepped away.
I came back later and the screen was black like power management had kicked in, but I don't have Windows configured to turn off the display.
I moved the mouse but got no response.
I run VNC server on this PC, so I used another PC to attempt a connection.
The connection was successful, but the display was corrupt and basically unusable.
I was able to navigate the PC's "Start" menu via the VNC session and shut the PC down.
After a reboot, the PC worked properly and I haven't had this happen again.I suppose it could have been some sort of problem with the display driver, but this PC NEVER crashes or locks up and this was definitely an unexpected occurrence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286368</id>
	<title>Re:The more things change</title>
	<author>Kozar\_The\_Malignant</author>
	<datestamp>1259696040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's nice to see they decided to forgo the cryptic error messages and offer the goth crowd a nice abyss to stare into.</p></div><p>The message is there.  However, the preceding line is:

COLOR 00</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's nice to see they decided to forgo the cryptic error messages and offer the goth crowd a nice abyss to stare into.The message is there .
However , the preceding line is : COLOR 00</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's nice to see they decided to forgo the cryptic error messages and offer the goth crowd a nice abyss to stare into.The message is there.
However, the preceding line is:

COLOR 00
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286180</id>
	<title>This has happened to me before.</title>
	<author>whitedsepdivine</author>
	<datestamp>1259695440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just boot to terminal, and restore your xorg.config</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just boot to terminal , and restore your xorg.config</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just boot to terminal, and restore your xorg.config</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30292070</id>
	<title>It's a feature</title>
	<author>war4peace</author>
	<datestamp>1259677260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's no bug, it's a feature. Windows saves power by reducing the monitor contrast and brightness to 0. Furthermore, it turns off the Video Card and unplugs the monitor from the power socket. Then blinds you.<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...I just had a chat with Steve, he said "you're lucky we didn't implement the population control routine; we couldn't figure out whether we should use inherent OS radiation or the hammer summoning algorythm on your testicles".</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's no bug , it 's a feature .
Windows saves power by reducing the monitor contrast and brightness to 0 .
Furthermore , it turns off the Video Card and unplugs the monitor from the power socket .
Then blinds you .
...I just had a chat with Steve , he said " you 're lucky we did n't implement the population control routine ; we could n't figure out whether we should use inherent OS radiation or the hammer summoning algorythm on your testicles " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's no bug, it's a feature.
Windows saves power by reducing the monitor contrast and brightness to 0.
Furthermore, it turns off the Video Card and unplugs the monitor from the power socket.
Then blinds you.
...I just had a chat with Steve, he said "you're lucky we didn't implement the population control routine; we couldn't figure out whether we should use inherent OS radiation or the hammer summoning algorythm on your testicles".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285700</id>
	<title>Happened to me twice ...</title>
	<author>cokegen</author>
	<datestamp>1259693760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's something video related, I've seen this bug in the two machines (Win7, can't speak for Vista) I own and for some reason the monitor get "reset" to 59 Hz instead of 60 Hz and I get the black screen. The funny thing is that is the LCD lamp is not turned on but the screen does, so if you put some light in front of the screen you'll still be able to see something in the screen. This one and a USB bug that prevents the mouse getting detected was sufficient to go back to XP.

I can't believe how these bugs pass QC. And sorry for my possibly bad english.


Carlos</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's something video related , I 've seen this bug in the two machines ( Win7 , ca n't speak for Vista ) I own and for some reason the monitor get " reset " to 59 Hz instead of 60 Hz and I get the black screen .
The funny thing is that is the LCD lamp is not turned on but the screen does , so if you put some light in front of the screen you 'll still be able to see something in the screen .
This one and a USB bug that prevents the mouse getting detected was sufficient to go back to XP .
I ca n't believe how these bugs pass QC .
And sorry for my possibly bad english .
Carlos</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's something video related, I've seen this bug in the two machines (Win7, can't speak for Vista) I own and for some reason the monitor get "reset" to 59 Hz instead of 60 Hz and I get the black screen.
The funny thing is that is the LCD lamp is not turned on but the screen does, so if you put some light in front of the screen you'll still be able to see something in the screen.
This one and a USB bug that prevents the mouse getting detected was sufficient to go back to XP.
I can't believe how these bugs pass QC.
And sorry for my possibly bad english.
Carlos</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285550</id>
	<title>Finally...</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1259693160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The headline should read "Microsoft finds way to make an Operating System 100\% secure".</p><p>Once the Black (screen of) Death Security Pack is installed, the computer locks up after login, meaning the user will not be able to surf to dangerous pages, will not be the victim of even the most clever social engineering hacks, and best of all won't see any spam any more, ever.</p><p>Users protected by the BsoDSP can feel free to emerge from their basements and experience RealWorld 1.0.  It's like a MMORPG, but with real sex.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The headline should read " Microsoft finds way to make an Operating System 100 \ % secure " .Once the Black ( screen of ) Death Security Pack is installed , the computer locks up after login , meaning the user will not be able to surf to dangerous pages , will not be the victim of even the most clever social engineering hacks , and best of all wo n't see any spam any more , ever.Users protected by the BsoDSP can feel free to emerge from their basements and experience RealWorld 1.0 .
It 's like a MMORPG , but with real sex .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The headline should read "Microsoft finds way to make an Operating System 100\% secure".Once the Black (screen of) Death Security Pack is installed, the computer locks up after login, meaning the user will not be able to surf to dangerous pages, will not be the victim of even the most clever social engineering hacks, and best of all won't see any spam any more, ever.Users protected by the BsoDSP can feel free to emerge from their basements and experience RealWorld 1.0.
It's like a MMORPG, but with real sex.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288134</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259659020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Changing the screen colors equals programmer status for some.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Changing the screen colors equals programmer status for some .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Changing the screen colors equals programmer status for some.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285800</id>
	<title>Huh</title>
	<author>man\_the\_king</author>
	<datestamp>1259694060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Different Color, Same Story.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Different Color , Same Story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Different Color, Same Story.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286216</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>LordLimecat</author>
	<datestamp>1259695560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unless noscript has an exploit, or you run into an infected PDF, or one of those malicious jpegs that can infect you from several years ago...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless noscript has an exploit , or you run into an infected PDF , or one of those malicious jpegs that can infect you from several years ago.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless noscript has an exploit, or you run into an infected PDF, or one of those malicious jpegs that can infect you from several years ago...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287076</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait, you got that mixed up with a screenshot from Doom 3.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait , you got that mixed up with a screenshot from Doom 3 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait, you got that mixed up with a screenshot from Doom 3.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285790</id>
	<title>Re:BSOD</title>
	<author>pixelpusher220</author>
	<datestamp>1259694000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>it's not a bug it's a feature!
<br> <br>
Microsoft heard all the buzz about 'skinning' apps and figured they'd one up them and skin an integral part of windoze<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's not a bug it 's a feature !
Microsoft heard all the buzz about 'skinning ' apps and figured they 'd one up them and skin an integral part of windoze ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's not a bug it's a feature!
Microsoft heard all the buzz about 'skinning' apps and figured they'd one up them and skin an integral part of windoze ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285748</id>
	<title>That was my idea.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259693880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I told Microsoft I wanted a simpler user interface, next thing you know... Windows 7 black screen of death!

</p><p>I'm a PC and Windows 7 was my idea...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I told Microsoft I wanted a simpler user interface , next thing you know... Windows 7 black screen of death !
I 'm a PC and Windows 7 was my idea.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I told Microsoft I wanted a simpler user interface, next thing you know... Windows 7 black screen of death!
I'm a PC and Windows 7 was my idea...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285598</id>
	<title>Headline is misleading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259693340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The issue is not limited to Win7  but effects most versions of windows. A ACL bug causes the black screen <a href="http://www.prevx.com/blog/140/Black-Screen-woes-could-affect-millions-on-Windows--Vista-and-XP.html" title="prevx.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.prevx.com/blog/140/Black-Screen-woes-could-affect-millions-on-Windows--Vista-and-XP.html</a> [prevx.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The issue is not limited to Win7 but effects most versions of windows .
A ACL bug causes the black screen http : //www.prevx.com/blog/140/Black-Screen-woes-could-affect-millions-on-Windows--Vista-and-XP.html [ prevx.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The issue is not limited to Win7  but effects most versions of windows.
A ACL bug causes the black screen http://www.prevx.com/blog/140/Black-Screen-woes-could-affect-millions-on-Windows--Vista-and-XP.html [prevx.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285660</id>
	<title>All of them?</title>
	<author>Jeff Carr</author>
	<datestamp>1259693580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The error means that users of Windows 7 and earlier operating systems...</p></div><p>Whew!  I'm so relieved I'm running Windows 8 on my main pc.  My server running Windows 3.11 is probably in trouble though, I'll have to see...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The error means that users of Windows 7 and earlier operating systems...Whew !
I 'm so relieved I 'm running Windows 8 on my main pc .
My server running Windows 3.11 is probably in trouble though , I 'll have to see.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The error means that users of Windows 7 and earlier operating systems...Whew!
I'm so relieved I'm running Windows 8 on my main pc.
My server running Windows 3.11 is probably in trouble though, I'll have to see...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30294678</id>
	<title>Re:The more things change</title>
	<author>s1lverl0rd</author>
	<datestamp>1259613900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I prefer blue screens over goatse, thank you very much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer blue screens over goatse , thank you very much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer blue screens over goatse, thank you very much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286488</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>rainmaestro</author>
	<datestamp>1259696460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, no, you're looking at it all wrong. What he really means is that securing windows is much easier when you use a blunt stick. Like, say, a sledgehammer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , no , you 're looking at it all wrong .
What he really means is that securing windows is much easier when you use a blunt stick .
Like , say , a sledgehammer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, no, you're looking at it all wrong.
What he really means is that securing windows is much easier when you use a blunt stick.
Like, say, a sledgehammer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285604</id>
	<title>happened to me over a month ago</title>
	<author>nxtw</author>
	<datestamp>1259693400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On my MSI Wind netbook running Windows 7, I once woke the system from sleep and got a black screen.  The machine was still working, the mouse cursor was on screen and moved with the touchpad, there was disk activity, it connected to the wireless network, caps lock/num lock were still responsive, but nothing else appeared on the screen and nothing I did made it work.  I had to manually power the system off.  I was able to wake the system from sleep many times before and after without any problems.</p><p>I didn't notice any updates that the problem could have been correlated with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On my MSI Wind netbook running Windows 7 , I once woke the system from sleep and got a black screen .
The machine was still working , the mouse cursor was on screen and moved with the touchpad , there was disk activity , it connected to the wireless network , caps lock/num lock were still responsive , but nothing else appeared on the screen and nothing I did made it work .
I had to manually power the system off .
I was able to wake the system from sleep many times before and after without any problems.I did n't notice any updates that the problem could have been correlated with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On my MSI Wind netbook running Windows 7, I once woke the system from sleep and got a black screen.
The machine was still working, the mouse cursor was on screen and moved with the touchpad, there was disk activity, it connected to the wireless network, caps lock/num lock were still responsive, but nothing else appeared on the screen and nothing I did made it work.
I had to manually power the system off.
I was able to wake the system from sleep many times before and after without any problems.I didn't notice any updates that the problem could have been correlated with.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288968</id>
	<title>Re:Problem Solved!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259662320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow. I'm glad I'm not the only person that has to go into work for this kind of crap.

I do must of my support remotely, but at least once a week I have to drive across town just to plug in a printer.  I ask on the phone "is there a green light or amber light lit on the printer?" "Yes, of course there is a green light" they respond.  "Are you sure?" I ask.  "Of course I am!" They say.  I drive 30 minutes over to the building, plug in the printer power cable, show them what a green light looks like and drive home.  Repeat weekly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow .
I 'm glad I 'm not the only person that has to go into work for this kind of crap .
I do must of my support remotely , but at least once a week I have to drive across town just to plug in a printer .
I ask on the phone " is there a green light or amber light lit on the printer ?
" " Yes , of course there is a green light " they respond .
" Are you sure ?
" I ask .
" Of course I am !
" They say .
I drive 30 minutes over to the building , plug in the printer power cable , show them what a green light looks like and drive home .
Repeat weekly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow.
I'm glad I'm not the only person that has to go into work for this kind of crap.
I do must of my support remotely, but at least once a week I have to drive across town just to plug in a printer.
I ask on the phone "is there a green light or amber light lit on the printer?
" "Yes, of course there is a green light" they respond.
"Are you sure?
" I ask.
"Of course I am!
" They say.
I drive 30 minutes over to the building, plug in the printer power cable, show them what a green light looks like and drive home.
Repeat weekly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286248</id>
	<title>A step back ward.</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1259695620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mentioned that Vista has a vastly improved version of Blue Screen of Death. Back then.
<a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=219390&amp;cid=17803986" title="slashdot.org">http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=219390&amp;cid=17803986</a> [slashdot.org] <p>

But in an effort to push Windows7 footprint small enough to be used in netbooks, thus eventually killing WinXP, they have sacrificed this improved version, going back even farther than XP's blue screen of death to black screen. It is truly sad, Microsoft is not even able to improve the Screen of Death experience. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mentioned that Vista has a vastly improved version of Blue Screen of Death .
Back then .
http : //tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 219390&amp;cid = 17803986 [ slashdot.org ] But in an effort to push Windows7 footprint small enough to be used in netbooks , thus eventually killing WinXP , they have sacrificed this improved version , going back even farther than XP 's blue screen of death to black screen .
It is truly sad , Microsoft is not even able to improve the Screen of Death experience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mentioned that Vista has a vastly improved version of Blue Screen of Death.
Back then.
http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=219390&amp;cid=17803986 [slashdot.org] 

But in an effort to push Windows7 footprint small enough to be used in netbooks, thus eventually killing WinXP, they have sacrificed this improved version, going back even farther than XP's blue screen of death to black screen.
It is truly sad, Microsoft is not even able to improve the Screen of Death experience. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286900</id>
	<title>Re:Problem Solved!</title>
	<author>Taibhsear</author>
	<datestamp>1259697780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Had a secretary at my first job with a similar problem. Reasons for "The computer is broken!":<br>1.) forgot to turn monitor on.<br>2.) didn't press power button on desktop<br>3.) kicked monitor plug near the power strip pulling it out of back of monitor.<br>4.) stepping on power strip rocker switch.<br>5.) somehow put the entire OS in dutch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Had a secretary at my first job with a similar problem .
Reasons for " The computer is broken ! " : 1 .
) forgot to turn monitor on.2 .
) did n't press power button on desktop3 .
) kicked monitor plug near the power strip pulling it out of back of monitor.4 .
) stepping on power strip rocker switch.5 .
) somehow put the entire OS in dutch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Had a secretary at my first job with a similar problem.
Reasons for "The computer is broken!":1.
) forgot to turn monitor on.2.
) didn't press power button on desktop3.
) kicked monitor plug near the power strip pulling it out of back of monitor.4.
) stepping on power strip rocker switch.5.
) somehow put the entire OS in dutch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285522</id>
	<title>The more things change</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259693040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's nice to see they decided to forgo the cryptic error messages and offer the goth crowd a nice abyss to stare into.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's nice to see they decided to forgo the cryptic error messages and offer the goth crowd a nice abyss to stare into .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's nice to see they decided to forgo the cryptic error messages and offer the goth crowd a nice abyss to stare into.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285454</id>
	<title>BSOD</title>
	<author>klwood911</author>
	<datestamp>1259692800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess they don't have to change the acronym then.  Saves on Apple and Microsoft's marketing budgets next year!  First Post!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess they do n't have to change the acronym then .
Saves on Apple and Microsoft 's marketing budgets next year !
First Post !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess they don't have to change the acronym then.
Saves on Apple and Microsoft's marketing budgets next year!
First Post!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288514</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1259660580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Although I agree with your post,</p><p><i>I also hope you've never fixed your car or a leaky faucet..<br></i><br>That's a terrible analogy. Physical things wear out, digital things just go out of style. Your roof doesn't leak because it was defective, it leaks because of physical laws covering the materials it's made of. You have to patch an OS or program because it was poorly designed. Cars have moving parts, and not only does corrosion never sleep, friction wears things out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Although I agree with your post,I also hope you 've never fixed your car or a leaky faucet..That 's a terrible analogy .
Physical things wear out , digital things just go out of style .
Your roof does n't leak because it was defective , it leaks because of physical laws covering the materials it 's made of .
You have to patch an OS or program because it was poorly designed .
Cars have moving parts , and not only does corrosion never sleep , friction wears things out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although I agree with your post,I also hope you've never fixed your car or a leaky faucet..That's a terrible analogy.
Physical things wear out, digital things just go out of style.
Your roof doesn't leak because it was defective, it leaks because of physical laws covering the materials it's made of.
You have to patch an OS or program because it was poorly designed.
Cars have moving parts, and not only does corrosion never sleep, friction wears things out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285940</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>u38cg</author>
	<datestamp>1259694540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Freeze it into a circle with a hole in the middle and use the stick as an axle.  Kids these days...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Freeze it into a circle with a hole in the middle and use the stick as an axle .
Kids these days.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Freeze it into a circle with a hole in the middle and use the stick as an axle.
Kids these days...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289358</id>
	<title>Re:Happened to me on a Server 2003 box</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259664300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I ran into that too, but it happened before login. We couldn't see the login screen, but if we typed (carefully) we could login and work normally. Changing the Colors in the registry fixed it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ran into that too , but it happened before login .
We could n't see the login screen , but if we typed ( carefully ) we could login and work normally .
Changing the Colors in the registry fixed it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I ran into that too, but it happened before login.
We couldn't see the login screen, but if we typed (carefully) we could login and work normally.
Changing the Colors in the registry fixed it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287192</id>
	<title>Need link to solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>white letter pages only please.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>white letter pages only please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>white letter pages only please.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286196</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259695500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Binary or decimal?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Binary or decimal ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Binary or decimal?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30304482</id>
	<title>Re:BSOD</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1259582040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>APPLE'S NOT ANY BETTER!!! THEY KILLED MY MAC!</p><p>I just tried to install security update 2009-005, and after I rebooted my Mac, that was it. Dead. It refuses to reload the OS and just sits there with that puissant spinning wheel.   And when I called Apple they refused to help unless I spent ~$200 on their recovery service. Burn in hell, Apple! ! I am never, never, never going to buy another one of your products.</p><p>And don't tell me I don't have a right to be angry. That's almost $2000 down the drain.  Piece of shit Macintosh</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>APPLE 'S NOT ANY BETTER ! ! !
THEY KILLED MY MAC ! I just tried to install security update 2009-005 , and after I rebooted my Mac , that was it .
Dead. It refuses to reload the OS and just sits there with that puissant spinning wheel .
And when I called Apple they refused to help unless I spent ~ $ 200 on their recovery service .
Burn in hell , Apple !
! I am never , never , never going to buy another one of your products.And do n't tell me I do n't have a right to be angry .
That 's almost $ 2000 down the drain .
Piece of shit Macintosh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>APPLE'S NOT ANY BETTER!!!
THEY KILLED MY MAC!I just tried to install security update 2009-005, and after I rebooted my Mac, that was it.
Dead. It refuses to reload the OS and just sits there with that puissant spinning wheel.
And when I called Apple they refused to help unless I spent ~$200 on their recovery service.
Burn in hell, Apple!
! I am never, never, never going to buy another one of your products.And don't tell me I don't have a right to be angry.
That's almost $2000 down the drain.
Piece of shit Macintosh</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286570</id>
	<title>Re:Finally...</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1259696760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's like a MMORPG, but with real sex<b>*</b>.</p></div><p>Whoa, buddy! Don't forget the disclaimer:<br>
* WARNING! Real sex may result in:<br>
Real STDs<br>
Real Pregnancy<br>
Real Expectation of Real Commitment<br>
and, for most of you, will be more difficult to obtain than full Tier 9 gear - especially if that comparison made sense to you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like a MMORPG , but with real sex * .Whoa , buddy !
Do n't forget the disclaimer : * WARNING !
Real sex may result in : Real STDs Real Pregnancy Real Expectation of Real Commitment and , for most of you , will be more difficult to obtain than full Tier 9 gear - especially if that comparison made sense to you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like a MMORPG, but with real sex*.Whoa, buddy!
Don't forget the disclaimer:
* WARNING!
Real sex may result in:
Real STDs
Real Pregnancy
Real Expectation of Real Commitment
and, for most of you, will be more difficult to obtain than full Tier 9 gear - especially if that comparison made sense to you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286774</id>
	<title>Re:BSOD</title>
	<author>Icegryphon</author>
	<datestamp>1259697360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I find your post humorous and wish to subscribe to your news letter.<br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEAGmBRC1dc" title="youtube.com">Cheers</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I find your post humorous and wish to subscribe to your news letter .
Cheers [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find your post humorous and wish to subscribe to your news letter.
Cheers [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30292402</id>
	<title>Re:BSOD</title>
	<author>JackieBrown</author>
	<datestamp>1259679300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Black is the new blue</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Black is the new blue</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Black is the new blue</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30299724</id>
	<title>Re:patches may make Win 7 not genuine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259607660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Excuse me, but<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I thought that pretty much everyone with some technical experience knows that you never, ever use the upgrade option with Windows. Always use the clean install if possible.</p></div><p>I've used the Upgrade option with both Vista and Windows 7, on three different computers, on Windows installs that had been running for well longer than a year. No issues. Most of the avoidance of it these days appears to be superstitious.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Excuse me , but ... I thought that pretty much everyone with some technical experience knows that you never , ever use the upgrade option with Windows .
Always use the clean install if possible.I 've used the Upgrade option with both Vista and Windows 7 , on three different computers , on Windows installs that had been running for well longer than a year .
No issues .
Most of the avoidance of it these days appears to be superstitious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Excuse me, but ... I thought that pretty much everyone with some technical experience knows that you never, ever use the upgrade option with Windows.
Always use the clean install if possible.I've used the Upgrade option with both Vista and Windows 7, on three different computers, on Windows installs that had been running for well longer than a year.
No issues.
Most of the avoidance of it these days appears to be superstitious.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288900</id>
	<title>pointless</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259662080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So Microsoft is not telling anyone which update is doing that?</p><p>What the hell are we supposed to block in WSUS?  As much as we want we can't block the entire group of fucking operating systems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So Microsoft is not telling anyone which update is doing that ? What the hell are we supposed to block in WSUS ?
As much as we want we ca n't block the entire group of fucking operating systems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Microsoft is not telling anyone which update is doing that?What the hell are we supposed to block in WSUS?
As much as we want we can't block the entire group of fucking operating systems.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288982</id>
	<title>Re:patches may make Win 7 not genuine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259662380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've usually had good results from upgrades, but I keep my systems generally free of crapware.  Even when I haven't had good results, fixing the problems was way less time than re-installing and reconfiguring all my applications.</p><p>If all someone does with a system is little more than e-mail and office apps, a clean install is probably the way to go.  If you've got a dozen tweaked development environments and a jumble of associated libraries, database systems, frameworks, and utilities, then image the system and try an upgrade - it's probably worth your time.</p><p>- T</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've usually had good results from upgrades , but I keep my systems generally free of crapware .
Even when I have n't had good results , fixing the problems was way less time than re-installing and reconfiguring all my applications.If all someone does with a system is little more than e-mail and office apps , a clean install is probably the way to go .
If you 've got a dozen tweaked development environments and a jumble of associated libraries , database systems , frameworks , and utilities , then image the system and try an upgrade - it 's probably worth your time.- T</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've usually had good results from upgrades, but I keep my systems generally free of crapware.
Even when I haven't had good results, fixing the problems was way less time than re-installing and reconfiguring all my applications.If all someone does with a system is little more than e-mail and office apps, a clean install is probably the way to go.
If you've got a dozen tweaked development environments and a jumble of associated libraries, database systems, frameworks, and utilities, then image the system and try an upgrade - it's probably worth your time.- T</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30291462</id>
	<title>Re:Happened to me twice ...</title>
	<author>UltimApe</author>
	<datestamp>1259673660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've had similar issues with my secondary monitor not showing up correctly because it decides to default it to a funny refresh rate... going into screen resolution setttings and it seems to remember that the monitor can run at 85hz and fixes itself.</p><p>Maybe the bug is in the how it does it's plug and play of monitors?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've had similar issues with my secondary monitor not showing up correctly because it decides to default it to a funny refresh rate... going into screen resolution setttings and it seems to remember that the monitor can run at 85hz and fixes itself.Maybe the bug is in the how it does it 's plug and play of monitors ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've had similar issues with my secondary monitor not showing up correctly because it decides to default it to a funny refresh rate... going into screen resolution setttings and it seems to remember that the monitor can run at 85hz and fixes itself.Maybe the bug is in the how it does it's plug and play of monitors?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289028</id>
	<title>this is...</title>
	<author>Vo1t</author>
	<datestamp>1259662680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>racist ! (in a black coffee kind of sense)

sue the bastards!</htmltext>
<tokenext>racist !
( in a black coffee kind of sense ) sue the bastards !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>racist !
(in a black coffee kind of sense)

sue the bastards!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285666</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>eln</author>
	<datestamp>1259693640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course your machine stays up, you have the administrators of at least 3 different botnets making sure of it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course your machine stays up , you have the administrators of at least 3 different botnets making sure of it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course your machine stays up, you have the administrators of at least 3 different botnets making sure of it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286700</id>
	<title>Re:Problem Solved!</title>
	<author>morgan\_greywolf</author>
	<datestamp>1259697120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Monitor?  Us old people don't have <em>monitors</em>.  We bang away at our teletypes!  What in the hell do you think TTY stands for? You kids and your newfangled 'monitors'.  Now get off of my lawn!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Monitor ?
Us old people do n't have monitors .
We bang away at our teletypes !
What in the hell do you think TTY stands for ?
You kids and your newfangled 'monitors' .
Now get off of my lawn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Monitor?
Us old people don't have monitors.
We bang away at our teletypes!
What in the hell do you think TTY stands for?
You kids and your newfangled 'monitors'.
Now get off of my lawn!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470</id>
	<title>Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>alen</author>
	<datestamp>1259692860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i was getting tired of the blue screen</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i was getting tired of the blue screen</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i was getting tired of the blue screen</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286286</id>
	<title>Ah Ha!</title>
	<author>mugnyte</author>
	<datestamp>1259695740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; 'Ah ha!' said the blind man, as he fell into the hole.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>  'Ah ha !
' said the blind man , as he fell into the hole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
  'Ah ha!
' said the blind man, as he fell into the hole.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286272</id>
	<title>Re:Finally...</title>
	<author>shadwstalkr</author>
	<datestamp>1259695740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sadly, reports of real sex have been greatly exaggerated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly , reports of real sex have been greatly exaggerated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly, reports of real sex have been greatly exaggerated.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285892</id>
	<title>Re:patches may make Win 7 not genuine</title>
	<author>jackchance</author>
	<datestamp>1259694360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>11/24 my windows machine is working perfectly,....11/28 come back from vacation turn my computer on and it updates itself with the 11/25 patches.  As soon as they are installed all of a sudden my copy is no longer genuine and I get all the warnings....Spend 2 hours with Microsoft last night. product key is valid.  They tell me that windows updater is corrupted and I need to reinstall the entire OS.  I was told it is an "issue" when doing a custom upgrade from Vista.</p></div><p>Best argument for mac, linux, freebsd (insert your favorite non-DRMed OS here) ever.</p><p>It angers me to NO END that tech supports answer to all computer problems is "re-format and re-install".  It is somewhat understandable since it can be very hard to figure out what kind of mess a machine is in on the end of a phone... but all consumer OSes should be able to boot into a live CD version of the OS that gives tech support access to the machine so they can diagnose the actual problem.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>11/24 my windows machine is working perfectly,....11/28 come back from vacation turn my computer on and it updates itself with the 11/25 patches .
As soon as they are installed all of a sudden my copy is no longer genuine and I get all the warnings....Spend 2 hours with Microsoft last night .
product key is valid .
They tell me that windows updater is corrupted and I need to reinstall the entire OS .
I was told it is an " issue " when doing a custom upgrade from Vista.Best argument for mac , linux , freebsd ( insert your favorite non-DRMed OS here ) ever.It angers me to NO END that tech supports answer to all computer problems is " re-format and re-install " .
It is somewhat understandable since it can be very hard to figure out what kind of mess a machine is in on the end of a phone... but all consumer OSes should be able to boot into a live CD version of the OS that gives tech support access to the machine so they can diagnose the actual problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>11/24 my windows machine is working perfectly,....11/28 come back from vacation turn my computer on and it updates itself with the 11/25 patches.
As soon as they are installed all of a sudden my copy is no longer genuine and I get all the warnings....Spend 2 hours with Microsoft last night.
product key is valid.
They tell me that windows updater is corrupted and I need to reinstall the entire OS.
I was told it is an "issue" when doing a custom upgrade from Vista.Best argument for mac, linux, freebsd (insert your favorite non-DRMed OS here) ever.It angers me to NO END that tech supports answer to all computer problems is "re-format and re-install".
It is somewhat understandable since it can be very hard to figure out what kind of mess a machine is in on the end of a phone... but all consumer OSes should be able to boot into a live CD version of the OS that gives tech support access to the machine so they can diagnose the actual problem.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287086</id>
	<title>Re:patches may make Win 7 not genuine</title>
	<author>superslacker87</author>
	<datestamp>1259698440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I am pretty sure that if there were tech support for Ubuntu, you would hear the same sorts of things.</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/support/services" title="ubuntu.com" rel="nofollow">Funny. There is tech support for Ubuntu.</a> [ubuntu.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am pretty sure that if there were tech support for Ubuntu , you would hear the same sorts of things .
Funny. There is tech support for Ubuntu .
[ ubuntu.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am pretty sure that if there were tech support for Ubuntu, you would hear the same sorts of things.
Funny. There is tech support for Ubuntu.
[ubuntu.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286986</id>
	<title>My XP SP3 Experience...</title>
	<author>tmassa99</author>
	<datestamp>1259698080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I work at a retailer that uses custom POS systems running on XP.  These are low-end systems (512-1024 MB RAM).  After the latest round of patches, many of these systems either ran out of system resources or would simply blue-screen and reboot.  I originally attributed it to a patch + Intel video driver + Symantec, since I could disable either SEP, or the Intel video driver, and all would be fine.  We originally had end users hit F8 and roll back to the Last Known Good, and that would fix it...until patches are applied again.

Interestingly enough, I've found that reducing the shared video memory in the systems' BIOS to 8 MB (from 32 MB) does the trick for these systems.

I can basically re-create the entire problem by re-installing XP SP3 + all patches, latest drivers, then install Symantec, and the problem starts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I work at a retailer that uses custom POS systems running on XP .
These are low-end systems ( 512-1024 MB RAM ) .
After the latest round of patches , many of these systems either ran out of system resources or would simply blue-screen and reboot .
I originally attributed it to a patch + Intel video driver + Symantec , since I could disable either SEP , or the Intel video driver , and all would be fine .
We originally had end users hit F8 and roll back to the Last Known Good , and that would fix it...until patches are applied again .
Interestingly enough , I 've found that reducing the shared video memory in the systems ' BIOS to 8 MB ( from 32 MB ) does the trick for these systems .
I can basically re-create the entire problem by re-installing XP SP3 + all patches , latest drivers , then install Symantec , and the problem starts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I work at a retailer that uses custom POS systems running on XP.
These are low-end systems (512-1024 MB RAM).
After the latest round of patches, many of these systems either ran out of system resources or would simply blue-screen and reboot.
I originally attributed it to a patch + Intel video driver + Symantec, since I could disable either SEP, or the Intel video driver, and all would be fine.
We originally had end users hit F8 and roll back to the Last Known Good, and that would fix it...until patches are applied again.
Interestingly enough, I've found that reducing the shared video memory in the systems' BIOS to 8 MB (from 32 MB) does the trick for these systems.
I can basically re-create the entire problem by re-installing XP SP3 + all patches, latest drivers, then install Symantec, and the problem starts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286894</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>b4dc0d3r</author>
	<datestamp>1259697780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's shooped.  I can tell by some of the pixels and from having seen quite a few shops in my time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's shooped .
I can tell by some of the pixels and from having seen quite a few shops in my time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's shooped.
I can tell by some of the pixels and from having seen quite a few shops in my time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285528</id>
	<title>Had this myself.. not a showstopper</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259693040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Had this the other day (Win7 Ultmate, Q6600 8GB RAM) it sat for a couple of minutes (there was some disk activity). Afterwards everything was fine; I chalked it up to an update and looks as though I was right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Had this the other day ( Win7 Ultmate , Q6600 8GB RAM ) it sat for a couple of minutes ( there was some disk activity ) .
Afterwards everything was fine ; I chalked it up to an update and looks as though I was right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Had this the other day (Win7 Ultmate, Q6600 8GB RAM) it sat for a couple of minutes (there was some disk activity).
Afterwards everything was fine; I chalked it up to an update and looks as though I was right.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286972</id>
	<title>Re:BSOD</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1259698020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, even less coherent than your usual posts - I didn't think it possible.</p><p>
Anyway, OS X is much better; it has a very tasteful grey screen of death.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , even less coherent than your usual posts - I did n't think it possible .
Anyway , OS X is much better ; it has a very tasteful grey screen of death .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, even less coherent than your usual posts - I didn't think it possible.
Anyway, OS X is much better; it has a very tasteful grey screen of death.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30294246</id>
	<title>Re:patches may make Win 7 not genuine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259695800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought that pretty much everyone with some technical experience knows that you never, ever use Windows. Always use another operating system if possible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought that pretty much everyone with some technical experience knows that you never , ever use Windows .
Always use another operating system if possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought that pretty much everyone with some technical experience knows that you never, ever use Windows.
Always use another operating system if possible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287188</id>
	<title>Re:patches may make Win 7 not genuine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I received that as well, but was able to successfully boot after I clicked on the choice that said something about getting genuine now.  I assumed it re-authenticated to the MS servers, and all was ok...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I received that as well , but was able to successfully boot after I clicked on the choice that said something about getting genuine now .
I assumed it re-authenticated to the MS servers , and all was ok.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I received that as well, but was able to successfully boot after I clicked on the choice that said something about getting genuine now.
I assumed it re-authenticated to the MS servers, and all was ok...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287370</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259699340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was hoping for a Green Screen of Death, but I guess black will have to do for now.</p><p>I guess the Green Screen of Death could sound kind of bad considering they use it Green Screens for TV &gt;.&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was hoping for a Green Screen of Death , but I guess black will have to do for now.I guess the Green Screen of Death could sound kind of bad considering they use it Green Screens for TV &gt; . &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was hoping for a Green Screen of Death, but I guess black will have to do for now.I guess the Green Screen of Death could sound kind of bad considering they use it Green Screens for TV &gt;.&gt;</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285740</id>
	<title>Solution</title>
	<author>Drakin020</author>
	<datestamp>1259693880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well if you experience this issue from an update, would "Last known good configuration" not resolve this?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well if you experience this issue from an update , would " Last known good configuration " not resolve this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well if you experience this issue from an update, would "Last known good configuration" not resolve this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30291602</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1259674620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>And since this is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., where everyone brags about their personal machine in their basement, I hope you've never run apt-get update and still run firefox 1.x/2.x (or whatever version was around in 2003).</i></p><p>I don't have a basement, you insensitive clod! THAT is slashdot. Badda bing!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...and firefox was at around 0.8 in Dec 2003</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History\_of\_Mozilla\_Firefox#Early\_history" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History\_of\_Mozilla\_Firefox#Early\_history</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And since this is /. , where everyone brags about their personal machine in their basement , I hope you 've never run apt-get update and still run firefox 1.x/2.x ( or whatever version was around in 2003 ) .I do n't have a basement , you insensitive clod !
THAT is slashdot .
Badda bing !
...and firefox was at around 0.8 in Dec 2003http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History \ _of \ _Mozilla \ _Firefox # Early \ _history [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And since this is /., where everyone brags about their personal machine in their basement, I hope you've never run apt-get update and still run firefox 1.x/2.x (or whatever version was around in 2003).I don't have a basement, you insensitive clod!
THAT is slashdot.
Badda bing!
...and firefox was at around 0.8 in Dec 2003http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History\_of\_Mozilla\_Firefox#Early\_history [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289518</id>
	<title>Re:Finally...</title>
	<author>jim\_v2000</author>
	<datestamp>1259664840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would be ok with that for most of the users I deal with.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would be ok with that for most of the users I deal with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would be ok with that for most of the users I deal with.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289064</id>
	<title>I get these a lot...</title>
	<author>straponego</author>
	<datestamp>1259662860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>On about a third of my boots into the Win7 RC.  I figured, eh, that's Windows for ya, and besides, it's an RC.  Also, you can't shut down without sitting around for ten minutes to make sure that every program feels like closing, every update is allowed or denied, etc.  Also, Java wants to update about ten minutes into each session, grabbing focus, you know, right when you're getting into a game.  I can tell it yes, no, don't ask again, whatever: it never, ever gives up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>On about a third of my boots into the Win7 RC .
I figured , eh , that 's Windows for ya , and besides , it 's an RC .
Also , you ca n't shut down without sitting around for ten minutes to make sure that every program feels like closing , every update is allowed or denied , etc .
Also , Java wants to update about ten minutes into each session , grabbing focus , you know , right when you 're getting into a game .
I can tell it yes , no , do n't ask again , whatever : it never , ever gives up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On about a third of my boots into the Win7 RC.
I figured, eh, that's Windows for ya, and besides, it's an RC.
Also, you can't shut down without sitting around for ten minutes to make sure that every program feels like closing, every update is allowed or denied, etc.
Also, Java wants to update about ten minutes into each session, grabbing focus, you know, right when you're getting into a game.
I can tell it yes, no, don't ask again, whatever: it never, ever gives up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285638</id>
	<title>Can't we get a Green Screen of Screams?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259693520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Screens of Death are *such* a cliche.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Screens of Death are * such * a cliche .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screens of Death are *such* a cliche.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286106</id>
	<title>Re:patches may make Win 7 not genuine</title>
	<author>SemiSpook</author>
	<datestamp>1259695140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, the Win7 install interface is much better than its predecessors, and besides, it's not like I had anything of real value (data wise) on my box to begin with. I've found that with certain Linux distros that reformat/reinstall also tends to work a lot better than getting your hands into the nuts and bolts (a lot of that occurred with Ubuntu). I think part of my issue there was the network interfaces weren't exactly compatible with Linux to begin with (the damned Broadcom 4318 chipset on my Compaq laptop), so that may have been a contributing factor.<br><br>Methinks MS had a good start with the Beta and RC testing, now they just need to get their acts together with the patching QC.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , the Win7 install interface is much better than its predecessors , and besides , it 's not like I had anything of real value ( data wise ) on my box to begin with .
I 've found that with certain Linux distros that reformat/reinstall also tends to work a lot better than getting your hands into the nuts and bolts ( a lot of that occurred with Ubuntu ) .
I think part of my issue there was the network interfaces were n't exactly compatible with Linux to begin with ( the damned Broadcom 4318 chipset on my Compaq laptop ) , so that may have been a contributing factor.Methinks MS had a good start with the Beta and RC testing , now they just need to get their acts together with the patching QC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, the Win7 install interface is much better than its predecessors, and besides, it's not like I had anything of real value (data wise) on my box to begin with.
I've found that with certain Linux distros that reformat/reinstall also tends to work a lot better than getting your hands into the nuts and bolts (a lot of that occurred with Ubuntu).
I think part of my issue there was the network interfaces weren't exactly compatible with Linux to begin with (the damned Broadcom 4318 chipset on my Compaq laptop), so that may have been a contributing factor.Methinks MS had a good start with the Beta and RC testing, now they just need to get their acts together with the patching QC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285634</id>
	<title>patches may make Win 7 not genuine</title>
	<author>svendsen</author>
	<datestamp>1259693520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>11/24 my windows machine is working perfectly,.  Been up for over  a month and fully activated (I bought the $30 Win 7 prof. EDU discount).   Turn off my computer the same night (vacation).
<br> <br>
11/28 come back from vacation turn my computer on and it updates itself with the 11/25 patches.  As soon as they are installed all of a sudden my copy is no longer genuine and I get all the warnings.
<br> <br>
Spend 2 hours with Microsoft last night. product key is valid.  They tell me that windows updater is corrupted and I need to reinstall the entire OS.  I was told it is an "issue" when doing a custom upgrade from Vista.
<br> <br>
Now this article is out I am wondering if their patches tried to tighten some DRM and broke a lot more then being reported.</htmltext>
<tokenext>11/24 my windows machine is working perfectly, .
Been up for over a month and fully activated ( I bought the $ 30 Win 7 prof. EDU discount ) .
Turn off my computer the same night ( vacation ) .
11/28 come back from vacation turn my computer on and it updates itself with the 11/25 patches .
As soon as they are installed all of a sudden my copy is no longer genuine and I get all the warnings .
Spend 2 hours with Microsoft last night .
product key is valid .
They tell me that windows updater is corrupted and I need to reinstall the entire OS .
I was told it is an " issue " when doing a custom upgrade from Vista .
Now this article is out I am wondering if their patches tried to tighten some DRM and broke a lot more then being reported .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>11/24 my windows machine is working perfectly,.
Been up for over  a month and fully activated (I bought the $30 Win 7 prof. EDU discount).
Turn off my computer the same night (vacation).
11/28 come back from vacation turn my computer on and it updates itself with the 11/25 patches.
As soon as they are installed all of a sudden my copy is no longer genuine and I get all the warnings.
Spend 2 hours with Microsoft last night.
product key is valid.
They tell me that windows updater is corrupted and I need to reinstall the entire OS.
I was told it is an "issue" when doing a custom upgrade from Vista.
Now this article is out I am wondering if their patches tried to tighten some DRM and broke a lot more then being reported.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286268</id>
	<title>blackscreen ?</title>
	<author>tohands</author>
	<datestamp>1259695740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't wait to get the red screen of life !</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait to get the red screen of life !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait to get the red screen of life !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285620</id>
	<title>Happened to me on a Server 2003 box</title>
	<author>gazuga</author>
	<datestamp>1259693400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had this happen a year or so ago on a Server 2003 box and never could find the actual cause.  I don't know if the fix is the same in this case, but in my case it was simple:</p><p>Check out [HKEY\_USERS\.DEFAULT\Control Panel\Colors] - if everything is set to [0 0 0], modify those values to something other than black.  The easiest thing to do, actually, is to export that key from another box that's good, then import on the box that's got the problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had this happen a year or so ago on a Server 2003 box and never could find the actual cause .
I do n't know if the fix is the same in this case , but in my case it was simple : Check out [ HKEY \ _USERS \ .DEFAULT \ Control Panel \ Colors ] - if everything is set to [ 0 0 0 ] , modify those values to something other than black .
The easiest thing to do , actually , is to export that key from another box that 's good , then import on the box that 's got the problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had this happen a year or so ago on a Server 2003 box and never could find the actual cause.
I don't know if the fix is the same in this case, but in my case it was simple:Check out [HKEY\_USERS\.DEFAULT\Control Panel\Colors] - if everything is set to [0 0 0], modify those values to something other than black.
The easiest thing to do, actually, is to export that key from another box that's good, then import on the box that's got the problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286528</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>neoform</author>
	<datestamp>1259696580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How'd you get the screenshot? Everytime it happens to me I can't seem to input any commands! <a href="http://imgur.com/ghTAA.jpg" title="imgur.com">http://imgur.com/ghTAA.jpg</a> [imgur.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>How 'd you get the screenshot ?
Everytime it happens to me I ca n't seem to input any commands !
http : //imgur.com/ghTAA.jpg [ imgur.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How'd you get the screenshot?
Everytime it happens to me I can't seem to input any commands!
http://imgur.com/ghTAA.jpg [imgur.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289436</id>
	<title>Well..</title>
	<author>PirateBlis</author>
	<datestamp>1259664600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>At least we can look on the bright side. Because it's black, PC was telling the truth in that Mac commercial when he said "It's not gonna have any of the problems Vista had, Trust me.". Cheeky bastards.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least we can look on the bright side .
Because it 's black , PC was telling the truth in that Mac commercial when he said " It 's not gon na have any of the problems Vista had , Trust me. " .
Cheeky bastards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least we can look on the bright side.
Because it's black, PC was telling the truth in that Mac commercial when he said "It's not gonna have any of the problems Vista had, Trust me.".
Cheeky bastards.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285476</id>
	<title>Henry Gates Ford:</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1259692920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"You can have any screen of death color you want, as long as it's black"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" You can have any screen of death color you want , as long as it 's black "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You can have any screen of death color you want, as long as it's black"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287664</id>
	<title>response from microsoft:</title>
	<author>Ingcuervo</author>
	<datestamp>1259700480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dear customer


Weren't all of you asking to us for years to get rid of the damn blue screen of death? there you go....

damn, there is no way to win against you

Sincerely yours,
Bill gates</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear customer Were n't all of you asking to us for years to get rid of the damn blue screen of death ?
there you go... . damn , there is no way to win against you Sincerely yours , Bill gates</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear customer


Weren't all of you asking to us for years to get rid of the damn blue screen of death?
there you go....

damn, there is no way to win against you

Sincerely yours,
Bill gates</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286182</id>
	<title>I found your problem.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259695440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You had windows installed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You had windows installed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You had windows installed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287730</id>
	<title>Re:Problem Solved!</title>
	<author>Barryke</author>
	<datestamp>1259700720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Turns out it was just affecting a bunch of old people who kept forgetting to turn their monitors on.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Seems like it, i hit my quota early today.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Turns out it was just affecting a bunch of old people who kept forgetting to turn their monitors on .
Seems like it , i hit my quota early today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Turns out it was just affecting a bunch of old people who kept forgetting to turn their monitors on.
Seems like it, i hit my quota early today.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289198</id>
	<title>Re:Problem Solved!</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1259663580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; 5.) somehow put the entire OS in dutch.<br><br>Perfect leesbaar, toch ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; 5 .
) somehow put the entire OS in dutch.Perfect leesbaar , toch ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; 5.
) somehow put the entire OS in dutch.Perfect leesbaar, toch ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286342</id>
	<title>I can confirm it happens on Vista 32-bit...</title>
	<author>Critical\_</author>
	<datestamp>1259695980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had the "Black Screen of Death" happen in the past week on two full-patched (and legal) Windows Vista 32-bit machines after recent patches. Both times the display wouldn't come back up. The system did not display anything when access via Microsoft Remote Desktop, VNC, and Dameware Utilites Mini Remote Control--these are all various ways to access a machine remotely. However, the systems was still allowing access to file and printer shares and I could perform remote administration via various utilities and agents but I couldn't get anything to display. I was able to force a safe shutdown and restart remotely. Since then both machines have been fine. I had initially chalked this up to a random Windows error but today's news has led me to reconsider whether this is in fact a bug.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had the " Black Screen of Death " happen in the past week on two full-patched ( and legal ) Windows Vista 32-bit machines after recent patches .
Both times the display would n't come back up .
The system did not display anything when access via Microsoft Remote Desktop , VNC , and Dameware Utilites Mini Remote Control--these are all various ways to access a machine remotely .
However , the systems was still allowing access to file and printer shares and I could perform remote administration via various utilities and agents but I could n't get anything to display .
I was able to force a safe shutdown and restart remotely .
Since then both machines have been fine .
I had initially chalked this up to a random Windows error but today 's news has led me to reconsider whether this is in fact a bug .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had the "Black Screen of Death" happen in the past week on two full-patched (and legal) Windows Vista 32-bit machines after recent patches.
Both times the display wouldn't come back up.
The system did not display anything when access via Microsoft Remote Desktop, VNC, and Dameware Utilites Mini Remote Control--these are all various ways to access a machine remotely.
However, the systems was still allowing access to file and printer shares and I could perform remote administration via various utilities and agents but I couldn't get anything to display.
I was able to force a safe shutdown and restart remotely.
Since then both machines have been fine.
I had initially chalked this up to a random Windows error but today's news has led me to reconsider whether this is in fact a bug.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286808</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>NotBornYesterday</author>
	<datestamp>1259697480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, black makes things look slimmer, sleeker, sexier.  Windows needs all the help it can get to resemble <i>any</i> of that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , black makes things look slimmer , sleeker , sexier .
Windows needs all the help it can get to resemble any of that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, black makes things look slimmer, sleeker, sexier.
Windows needs all the help it can get to resemble any of that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460</id>
	<title>Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>Finallyjoined!!!</author>
	<datestamp>1259692860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Securing windows is like pushing water uphill with a sharp stick.<br> <br>
Firewall the bugger &amp; leave it be. Works for me<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-) No updates since 2003, system just stays up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Securing windows is like pushing water uphill with a sharp stick .
Firewall the bugger &amp; leave it be .
Works for me : - ) No updates since 2003 , system just stays up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Securing windows is like pushing water uphill with a sharp stick.
Firewall the bugger &amp; leave it be.
Works for me :-) No updates since 2003, system just stays up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288054</id>
	<title>Was Already Common</title>
	<author>pgn674</author>
	<datestamp>1259658720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've seen this pretty frequently for the past 5 years. After log on (automatic or manual), the screen is powered but black, save for a regular cursor that can be moved around. Ctrl+Alt+Del and other keyboard and special key shortcuts do nothing. It's usually been because some malware or antivirus corrupted some component of Windows. Sometimes removing the malware in safe mode has worked (if the black screen wasn't occurring there), sometimes a repair install was necessary. Rarely has a reformat been needed when it's still doing the black screen thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen this pretty frequently for the past 5 years .
After log on ( automatic or manual ) , the screen is powered but black , save for a regular cursor that can be moved around .
Ctrl + Alt + Del and other keyboard and special key shortcuts do nothing .
It 's usually been because some malware or antivirus corrupted some component of Windows .
Sometimes removing the malware in safe mode has worked ( if the black screen was n't occurring there ) , sometimes a repair install was necessary .
Rarely has a reformat been needed when it 's still doing the black screen thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen this pretty frequently for the past 5 years.
After log on (automatic or manual), the screen is powered but black, save for a regular cursor that can be moved around.
Ctrl+Alt+Del and other keyboard and special key shortcuts do nothing.
It's usually been because some malware or antivirus corrupted some component of Windows.
Sometimes removing the malware in safe mode has worked (if the black screen wasn't occurring there), sometimes a repair install was necessary.
Rarely has a reformat been needed when it's still doing the black screen thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287068</id>
	<title>You are likely to be eaten by a grue</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is all</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is all</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is all</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289368</id>
	<title>IT</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259664360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hello IT. Have you tried turning it off and on again?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... OK, well, the button on the side. Is it glowing?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Yeah, you need to turn it on. Err, the button turns it on. Yeah, you do know how a button works, don't you? No, not on clothes.  No, there you go, I just heard it come on. No, that's the music you hear when it comes on. No, that's the music you hear when... I'm sorry, are you from the past?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hello IT .
Have you tried turning it off and on again ?
... OK , well , the button on the side .
Is it glowing ?
... Yeah , you need to turn it on .
Err , the button turns it on .
Yeah , you do know how a button works , do n't you ?
No , not on clothes .
No , there you go , I just heard it come on .
No , that 's the music you hear when it comes on .
No , that 's the music you hear when... I 'm sorry , are you from the past ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hello IT.
Have you tried turning it off and on again?
... OK, well, the button on the side.
Is it glowing?
... Yeah, you need to turn it on.
Err, the button turns it on.
Yeah, you do know how a button works, don't you?
No, not on clothes.
No, there you go, I just heard it come on.
No, that's the music you hear when it comes on.
No, that's the music you hear when... I'm sorry, are you from the past?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285576</id>
	<title>Optical problem</title>
	<author>EmperorOfCanada</author>
	<datestamp>1259693280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>After hundreds of hours of diagnostics I realized that my eyes were closed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>After hundreds of hours of diagnostics I realized that my eyes were closed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After hundreds of hours of diagnostics I realized that my eyes were closed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285792</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>ClayJar</author>
	<datestamp>1259694000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Securing windows is like pushing water uphill with a sharp stick.</p></div><p>So, if I follow what you're saying, securing windows is much easier when it freezes?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Securing windows is like pushing water uphill with a sharp stick.So , if I follow what you 're saying , securing windows is much easier when it freezes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Securing windows is like pushing water uphill with a sharp stick.So, if I follow what you're saying, securing windows is much easier when it freezes?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288294</id>
	<title>Re:Finally...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259659740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It's like a MMORPG, but with real sex.</i></p><p>I had this happen to me so I decided to try out this "RealWorld 1.0". And, no it isn't. It's more like a MMORPG, but with restraining orders.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like a MMORPG , but with real sex.I had this happen to me so I decided to try out this " RealWorld 1.0 " .
And , no it is n't .
It 's more like a MMORPG , but with restraining orders .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like a MMORPG, but with real sex.I had this happen to me so I decided to try out this "RealWorld 1.0".
And, no it isn't.
It's more like a MMORPG, but with restraining orders.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285652</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259693520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.macosxtips.co.uk/black.png" title="macosxtips.co.uk">Screenshot here.</a> [macosxtips.co.uk]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Screenshot here .
[ macosxtips.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screenshot here.
[macosxtips.co.uk]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286110</id>
	<title>BSoD?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259695140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this what you get when windows fail to start up blue screen of death?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this what you get when windows fail to start up blue screen of death ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this what you get when windows fail to start up blue screen of death?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30290760</id>
	<title>"Black" Screen of Death Solution</title>
	<author>gorba</author>
	<datestamp>1259670360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This probably means the user needs to turn on their computer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This probably means the user needs to turn on their computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This probably means the user needs to turn on their computer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286558</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>ruemere</author>
	<datestamp>1259696700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who knows... maybe he is not using your typical windows.</p><p>Regards,<br>Ruemere</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who knows... maybe he is not using your typical windows.Regards,Ruemere</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who knows... maybe he is not using your typical windows.Regards,Ruemere</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286120</id>
	<title>I had it happen on XP</title>
	<author>snoig</author>
	<datestamp>1259695200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just had to rebuild our CEO's Lenovo because of this problem.  The worst part was that Lenovo absolutely refused to help because the laptop was purchased with Vista and upgraded to XP.  Why do they even allow that option if they will not support it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just had to rebuild our CEO 's Lenovo because of this problem .
The worst part was that Lenovo absolutely refused to help because the laptop was purchased with Vista and upgraded to XP .
Why do they even allow that option if they will not support it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just had to rebuild our CEO's Lenovo because of this problem.
The worst part was that Lenovo absolutely refused to help because the laptop was purchased with Vista and upgraded to XP.
Why do they even allow that option if they will not support it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287612</id>
	<title>Re:Happened to me on a Server 2003 box</title>
	<author>FooHentai</author>
	<datestamp>1259700180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is caused by running out of disk space on C:\

Seen it a few times.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is caused by running out of disk space on C : \ Seen it a few times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is caused by running out of disk space on C:\

Seen it a few times.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289772</id>
	<title>Tuesday 25 November</title>
	<author>pgn674</author>
	<datestamp>1259665920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>November 25 was a Wednesday. You're like my professors. All of them. I swear, they do this every time.<br>
<br>
Anyway, the article says it was November 10, which was a Tuesday.</htmltext>
<tokenext>November 25 was a Wednesday .
You 're like my professors .
All of them .
I swear , they do this every time .
Anyway , the article says it was November 10 , which was a Tuesday .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>November 25 was a Wednesday.
You're like my professors.
All of them.
I swear, they do this every time.
Anyway, the article says it was November 10, which was a Tuesday.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30292734</id>
	<title>Re:Hit me twice in 2 days</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259681820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>first was while playing a game online, and I though it was the game that crashed.  Black screen, nothing worked, but the background music from the game kept playing.  I waited longer than 5 minutes to see if the game would exit.  When it did not I got suspicios since protected memory in 7 should not have allowed the gamr to crash the kernel.  NOTHIGN was in the error logs related to it (other than the obligitory "you did not shut down properly" errors after I hit the reset button on the tower.</p><p>Next day, I had just turned it on about 20 minutes earlier, and the only thing running was Opera.  Same deal, complete lock up.</p><p>7 has been running great on this machine since the day it hit my MAPS dowload queue and I installed it.  Not one crash prior except an issue installing HP's printer system first time around (second try, it worked flawlessly).</p></div><p>Same thing happened to me.  I rebooted the machine and the screen went black.  Then it came back on.<br>I was able to replicate the problem by rebooting repeatedly.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>first was while playing a game online , and I though it was the game that crashed .
Black screen , nothing worked , but the background music from the game kept playing .
I waited longer than 5 minutes to see if the game would exit .
When it did not I got suspicios since protected memory in 7 should not have allowed the gamr to crash the kernel .
NOTHIGN was in the error logs related to it ( other than the obligitory " you did not shut down properly " errors after I hit the reset button on the tower.Next day , I had just turned it on about 20 minutes earlier , and the only thing running was Opera .
Same deal , complete lock up.7 has been running great on this machine since the day it hit my MAPS dowload queue and I installed it .
Not one crash prior except an issue installing HP 's printer system first time around ( second try , it worked flawlessly ) .Same thing happened to me .
I rebooted the machine and the screen went black .
Then it came back on.I was able to replicate the problem by rebooting repeatedly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>first was while playing a game online, and I though it was the game that crashed.
Black screen, nothing worked, but the background music from the game kept playing.
I waited longer than 5 minutes to see if the game would exit.
When it did not I got suspicios since protected memory in 7 should not have allowed the gamr to crash the kernel.
NOTHIGN was in the error logs related to it (other than the obligitory "you did not shut down properly" errors after I hit the reset button on the tower.Next day, I had just turned it on about 20 minutes earlier, and the only thing running was Opera.
Same deal, complete lock up.7 has been running great on this machine since the day it hit my MAPS dowload queue and I installed it.
Not one crash prior except an issue installing HP's printer system first time around (second try, it worked flawlessly).Same thing happened to me.
I rebooted the machine and the screen went black.
Then it came back on.I was able to replicate the problem by rebooting repeatedly.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286144</id>
	<title>Re:patches may make Win 7 not genuine</title>
	<author>thisnamestoolong</author>
	<datestamp>1259695260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ummm... what? Mac OSX is just as locked down as Windows. As for Linux/BSD tech support... I am pretty sure that if there were tech support for Ubuntu, you would hear the same sorts of things.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ummm... what ? Mac OSX is just as locked down as Windows .
As for Linux/BSD tech support... I am pretty sure that if there were tech support for Ubuntu , you would hear the same sorts of things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ummm... what? Mac OSX is just as locked down as Windows.
As for Linux/BSD tech support... I am pretty sure that if there were tech support for Ubuntu, you would hear the same sorts of things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285846</id>
	<title>Re:BSOD</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259694180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So Windows 8 will have the Beige Screen of Death, Windows 9 the Brown one, and Windows 10... well, Microsoft will change naming standards again, so from there on Windows will have codenames like Bronze, Brass, Burgundy and Bizantine (and more from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_colors#B" title="wikipedia.org">this list</a> [wikipedia.org])</htmltext>
<tokenext>So Windows 8 will have the Beige Screen of Death , Windows 9 the Brown one , and Windows 10... well , Microsoft will change naming standards again , so from there on Windows will have codenames like Bronze , Brass , Burgundy and Bizantine ( and more from this list [ wikipedia.org ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Windows 8 will have the Beige Screen of Death, Windows 9 the Brown one, and Windows 10... well, Microsoft will change naming standards again, so from there on Windows will have codenames like Bronze, Brass, Burgundy and Bizantine (and more from this list [wikipedia.org])</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289234</id>
	<title>Fool Me Once... Fool me 500 Times. Duh</title>
	<author>curmudgeon99</author>
	<datestamp>1259663700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Folks,
   Why on earth are people still bothering with the crap software produced by Microsoft. Their brand-spanking-new Windows7 is turning out to be buggy. To quote Gomer Pyle: "Surprise surprise surprise".</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Folks , Why on earth are people still bothering with the crap software produced by Microsoft .
Their brand-spanking-new Windows7 is turning out to be buggy .
To quote Gomer Pyle : " Surprise surprise surprise " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Folks,
   Why on earth are people still bothering with the crap software produced by Microsoft.
Their brand-spanking-new Windows7 is turning out to be buggy.
To quote Gomer Pyle: "Surprise surprise surprise".
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285548</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>snowraver1</author>
	<datestamp>1259693100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really?  I can't remember the last time I blue screened.  Maybe you should check your ram or update your video driver.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
I ca n't remember the last time I blue screened .
Maybe you should check your ram or update your video driver .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
I can't remember the last time I blue screened.
Maybe you should check your ram or update your video driver.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285628</id>
	<title>Windows Genuine Disadvantage</title>
	<author>idontgno</author>
	<datestamp>1259693460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone know if some descendant of WGA is part of Win 7? The description of the problem in TFA (and also the corresponding <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1564057/microsoft-investigates-black-screen-death" title="theinquirer.net">Inq article</a> [theinquirer.net] reminds me of a botched WGA "software self-help" thing.</p><p>Of course, it could just be a garden-variety bug in something besides WGA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone know if some descendant of WGA is part of Win 7 ?
The description of the problem in TFA ( and also the corresponding Inq article [ theinquirer.net ] reminds me of a botched WGA " software self-help " thing.Of course , it could just be a garden-variety bug in something besides WGA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone know if some descendant of WGA is part of Win 7?
The description of the problem in TFA (and also the corresponding Inq article [theinquirer.net] reminds me of a botched WGA "software self-help" thing.Of course, it could just be a garden-variety bug in something besides WGA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30290078</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>Enti</author>
	<datestamp>1259667120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And improving Linux is like trying to beat the devil out of an autistic child, right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>And improving Linux is like trying to beat the devil out of an autistic child , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And improving Linux is like trying to beat the devil out of an autistic child, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30297720</id>
	<title>Re:Problem Solved!</title>
	<author>Taibhsear</author>
	<datestamp>1259598720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was 16, she was over 30. (Twilight wasn't out yet back then so I'm pretty sure she was just dumb.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was 16 , she was over 30 .
( Twilight was n't out yet back then so I 'm pretty sure she was just dumb .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was 16, she was over 30.
(Twilight wasn't out yet back then so I'm pretty sure she was just dumb.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288334</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259659860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Recipe for successful Windows use:</p><p>Take one Windows XP Professional Corporate Edition RTM SP0 ISO. Use nLite to remove Windows Update, System Restore, Windows Tour, Themes, device drivers, and anything else you won't need. Now install the resulting ISO into a VirtualBox VM with all networking disabled. Use the key that begins "FCKGW." Install VirtualBox guest additions and use VirtualBox shares only for sharing files with the host OS. Observe how it runs faster than a native install of Windows, even on a machine without hardware virtualization. In the unlikely event that you become infected by a virus, laugh as it totally fails to contact the outside world - then roll back to a known good snapshot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Recipe for successful Windows use : Take one Windows XP Professional Corporate Edition RTM SP0 ISO .
Use nLite to remove Windows Update , System Restore , Windows Tour , Themes , device drivers , and anything else you wo n't need .
Now install the resulting ISO into a VirtualBox VM with all networking disabled .
Use the key that begins " FCKGW .
" Install VirtualBox guest additions and use VirtualBox shares only for sharing files with the host OS .
Observe how it runs faster than a native install of Windows , even on a machine without hardware virtualization .
In the unlikely event that you become infected by a virus , laugh as it totally fails to contact the outside world - then roll back to a known good snapshot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Recipe for successful Windows use:Take one Windows XP Professional Corporate Edition RTM SP0 ISO.
Use nLite to remove Windows Update, System Restore, Windows Tour, Themes, device drivers, and anything else you won't need.
Now install the resulting ISO into a VirtualBox VM with all networking disabled.
Use the key that begins "FCKGW.
" Install VirtualBox guest additions and use VirtualBox shares only for sharing files with the host OS.
Observe how it runs faster than a native install of Windows, even on a machine without hardware virtualization.
In the unlikely event that you become infected by a virus, laugh as it totally fails to contact the outside world - then roll back to a known good snapshot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287812</id>
	<title>Re:Finally...</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1259701020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...RealWorld 1.0. It's like a MMORPG, but with real sex."</p><p>Liar!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...RealWorld 1.0 .
It 's like a MMORPG , but with real sex .
" Liar !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...RealWorld 1.0.
It's like a MMORPG, but with real sex.
"Liar!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30290316</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>Seekerofknowledge</author>
	<datestamp>1259668320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would argue that original software from 2003 is Security Through Obscurity.   Malware will be targeting bugs in current versions of software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would argue that original software from 2003 is Security Through Obscurity .
Malware will be targeting bugs in current versions of software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would argue that original software from 2003 is Security Through Obscurity.
Malware will be targeting bugs in current versions of software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288184</id>
	<title>Re:Finally...</title>
	<author>Follier</author>
	<datestamp>1259659320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I dunno, I've been running in RealWorld 0.8 and the mmo aspects of real sex were <em>severely</em> over-hyped on that one.  But to be fair, I've beat it on single player mode like a thousand times and it still hasn't gotten old.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I dunno , I 've been running in RealWorld 0.8 and the mmo aspects of real sex were severely over-hyped on that one .
But to be fair , I 've beat it on single player mode like a thousand times and it still has n't gotten old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dunno, I've been running in RealWorld 0.8 and the mmo aspects of real sex were severely over-hyped on that one.
But to be fair, I've beat it on single player mode like a thousand times and it still hasn't gotten old.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285788</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>Fatalv</author>
	<datestamp>1259694000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Being that I'm color blind, the new black screen allows me to enjoy the horrors of windows in it's original unaltered form! Thanks Microsoft!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Being that I 'm color blind , the new black screen allows me to enjoy the horrors of windows in it 's original unaltered form !
Thanks Microsoft !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being that I'm color blind, the new black screen allows me to enjoy the horrors of windows in it's original unaltered form!
Thanks Microsoft!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286348</id>
	<title>it happend to me</title>
	<author>eargauges</author>
	<datestamp>1259695980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I could have sworn this happened to me yesterday, my screen just went all black! wtf Microsoft
<a href="http://www.eargauges.net/" title="eargauges.net" rel="nofollow">Ear Gauges</a> [eargauges.net]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I could have sworn this happened to me yesterday , my screen just went all black !
wtf Microsoft Ear Gauges [ eargauges.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could have sworn this happened to me yesterday, my screen just went all black!
wtf Microsoft
Ear Gauges [eargauges.net]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286000</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259694840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's a joke</p><p>i can count the number of blue screens and viruses i've had on my windows PC's in the last 10-15 years on one hand.</p><p>
&nbsp; and i am counting each finger only once.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's a jokei can count the number of blue screens and viruses i 've had on my windows PC 's in the last 10-15 years on one hand .
  and i am counting each finger only once .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's a jokei can count the number of blue screens and viruses i've had on my windows PC's in the last 10-15 years on one hand.
  and i am counting each finger only once.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286480</id>
	<title>New Name</title>
	<author>Cur8or</author>
	<datestamp>1259696400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>We'll have to find a new name for the day the last Windows pc is shut down.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 'll have to find a new name for the day the last Windows pc is shut down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We'll have to find a new name for the day the last Windows pc is shut down.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287822</id>
	<title>Re:patches may make Win 7 not genuine</title>
	<author>I\_have\_a\_life</author>
	<datestamp>1259701080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Best argument for mac, linux, freebsd (insert your favorite non-DRMed OS here) ever.</p><p>It angers me to NO END that tech supports answer to all computer problems is "re-format and re-install".  </p></div><p>The Windows 7 installation disk is also a live CD that allows you to: revert back to a system restore point, run memory and disk checks, and do a complete restore from an backup image. Of course, you have to create a backup image beforehand (shocker) and (surprise surprise) when you create the backup image you have an option to create a system rescue DVD to restore the image (though it's not necessary if you have the Windows 7 installation disk).</p><p>Works pretty much the same as my Macbook and Jaunty Jackalope...</p><p>So no need to be angry, you can still relax... for now.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Best argument for mac , linux , freebsd ( insert your favorite non-DRMed OS here ) ever.It angers me to NO END that tech supports answer to all computer problems is " re-format and re-install " .
The Windows 7 installation disk is also a live CD that allows you to : revert back to a system restore point , run memory and disk checks , and do a complete restore from an backup image .
Of course , you have to create a backup image beforehand ( shocker ) and ( surprise surprise ) when you create the backup image you have an option to create a system rescue DVD to restore the image ( though it 's not necessary if you have the Windows 7 installation disk ) .Works pretty much the same as my Macbook and Jaunty Jackalope...So no need to be angry , you can still relax... for now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Best argument for mac, linux, freebsd (insert your favorite non-DRMed OS here) ever.It angers me to NO END that tech supports answer to all computer problems is "re-format and re-install".
The Windows 7 installation disk is also a live CD that allows you to: revert back to a system restore point, run memory and disk checks, and do a complete restore from an backup image.
Of course, you have to create a backup image beforehand (shocker) and (surprise surprise) when you create the backup image you have an option to create a system rescue DVD to restore the image (though it's not necessary if you have the Windows 7 installation disk).Works pretty much the same as my Macbook and Jaunty Jackalope...So no need to be angry, you can still relax... for now.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289074</id>
	<title>I would try recycyling monitor power</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1259662860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since the early days, monitors signal to system you know. Especially if I had that issue and a digitally connected monitor, I would try recycling (power on/off) monitor or carefully replugging it.</p><p>It may cause display to refresh. As people say monitor actually displays things, just the backlight is off. I haven't got a slightest clue how can one  manage to do it. Is it in DPMI specs? DVI specs?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the early days , monitors signal to system you know .
Especially if I had that issue and a digitally connected monitor , I would try recycling ( power on/off ) monitor or carefully replugging it.It may cause display to refresh .
As people say monitor actually displays things , just the backlight is off .
I have n't got a slightest clue how can one manage to do it .
Is it in DPMI specs ?
DVI specs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the early days, monitors signal to system you know.
Especially if I had that issue and a digitally connected monitor, I would try recycling (power on/off) monitor or carefully replugging it.It may cause display to refresh.
As people say monitor actually displays things, just the backlight is off.
I haven't got a slightest clue how can one  manage to do it.
Is it in DPMI specs?
DVI specs?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30292472</id>
	<title>about damn time....</title>
	<author>hubdawg</author>
	<datestamp>1259679900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am so through with the blue. Black is a pleasant change, and I welcome it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am so through with the blue .
Black is a pleasant change , and I welcome it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am so through with the blue.
Black is a pleasant change, and I welcome it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286102</id>
	<title>Re:patches may make Win 7 not genuine</title>
	<author>jittles</author>
	<datestamp>1259695140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It also invalidated my install of Office 2007.  Reinstalling the OS, patching and then reinstalling Office 2007 worked but what a pain.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It also invalidated my install of Office 2007 .
Reinstalling the OS , patching and then reinstalling Office 2007 worked but what a pain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It also invalidated my install of Office 2007.
Reinstalling the OS, patching and then reinstalling Office 2007 worked but what a pain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289754</id>
	<title>Re:Problem Solved!</title>
	<author>malakai</author>
	<datestamp>1259665860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey nerd... she's hitting on you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey nerd... she 's hitting on you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey nerd... she's hitting on you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286862</id>
	<title>Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>physburn</author>
	<datestamp>1259697660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even though this bug probably gets to inconvenience millions of people
around the world. I can't help feeling a little happy as linux user each
time such a story comes out. Its that warm smug feeling of superiority
dispute all I did was choice to download an slightly rarer OS.
<p>
---
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/Microsoft\%20Windows/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com">Microsoft Windows</a> [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ <a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/" title="feeddistiller.com">Feed Distiller</a> [feeddistiller.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even though this bug probably gets to inconvenience millions of people around the world .
I ca n't help feeling a little happy as linux user each time such a story comes out .
Its that warm smug feeling of superiority dispute all I did was choice to download an slightly rarer OS .
--- Microsoft Windows [ feeddistiller.com ] Feed @ Feed Distiller [ feeddistiller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even though this bug probably gets to inconvenience millions of people
around the world.
I can't help feeling a little happy as linux user each
time such a story comes out.
Its that warm smug feeling of superiority
dispute all I did was choice to download an slightly rarer OS.
---

Microsoft Windows [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288468</id>
	<title>Green?</title>
	<author>psbrogna</author>
	<datestamp>1259660400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>MS switching that Windows dialog box we all love so much from blue to black may just be a green thing.
<br>
<br>
'cause, you know- a black CRT uses less energy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>MS switching that Windows dialog box we all love so much from blue to black may just be a green thing .
'cause , you know- a black CRT uses less energy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MS switching that Windows dialog box we all love so much from blue to black may just be a green thing.
'cause, you know- a black CRT uses less energy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285508</id>
	<title>Hmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259692980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did anybody think to check the power cord?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anybody think to check the power cord ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anybody think to check the power cord?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287660</id>
	<title>Re:BSOD</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1259700420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>What I don't understand is why a SECURITY update would kill my Mac.    </b>    I think I'd rather have an adbot than a broken machine.  The adbot is annoying, but it still lets me use my computer to access the net.   Security Update 2009-005  Bricked my computer.</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I do n't understand is why a SECURITY update would kill my Mac .
I think I 'd rather have an adbot than a broken machine .
The adbot is annoying , but it still lets me use my computer to access the net .
Security Update 2009-005 Bricked my computer .
: - (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I don't understand is why a SECURITY update would kill my Mac.
I think I'd rather have an adbot than a broken machine.
The adbot is annoying, but it still lets me use my computer to access the net.
Security Update 2009-005  Bricked my computer.
:-(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288200</id>
	<title>Re:Can confirm the issue from personal experience</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259659380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Happened to me on my Windows 7 Ultimate laptop a couple of days ago. A reboot seemed to have fixed it.</p><p>I thought it was just something to do with the 24 inch LCD plugged into the laptop's vga out.</p><p>Guess it might have been this bug as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Happened to me on my Windows 7 Ultimate laptop a couple of days ago .
A reboot seemed to have fixed it.I thought it was just something to do with the 24 inch LCD plugged into the laptop 's vga out.Guess it might have been this bug as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Happened to me on my Windows 7 Ultimate laptop a couple of days ago.
A reboot seemed to have fixed it.I thought it was just something to do with the 24 inch LCD plugged into the laptop's vga out.Guess it might have been this bug as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286298</id>
	<title>Re:Finally...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259695800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's like a MMORPG, but with real sex.</p></div><p>Eww you told me you were raiding with your guild spending all this time online after dark!</p><p>
&nbsp; - Your ex-wife</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like a MMORPG , but with real sex.Eww you told me you were raiding with your guild spending all this time online after dark !
  - Your ex-wife</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like a MMORPG, but with real sex.Eww you told me you were raiding with your guild spending all this time online after dark!
  - Your ex-wife
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286896</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>DiegoBravo</author>
	<datestamp>1259697780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a client running an invoicing application in an SCO Unix from a time where there was no Internet here (around 1990.) The server and terminals (about 20, updated some years ago to recycled Pentium I/IIs) never were connected to Internet. The application sometimes gets patched (for new functionality); the hardware gets replaced (hard disks die), but the OS is the same from the old times.</p><p>Of course they simply don't understand why their brand new Windows PCs need all those patches, Antivirus, but eventually crash.</p><p>Some years ago they considered their application upgrading to a new (GUI/WEB) platform... no more!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a client running an invoicing application in an SCO Unix from a time where there was no Internet here ( around 1990 .
) The server and terminals ( about 20 , updated some years ago to recycled Pentium I/IIs ) never were connected to Internet .
The application sometimes gets patched ( for new functionality ) ; the hardware gets replaced ( hard disks die ) , but the OS is the same from the old times.Of course they simply do n't understand why their brand new Windows PCs need all those patches , Antivirus , but eventually crash.Some years ago they considered their application upgrading to a new ( GUI/WEB ) platform... no more !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a client running an invoicing application in an SCO Unix from a time where there was no Internet here (around 1990.
) The server and terminals (about 20, updated some years ago to recycled Pentium I/IIs) never were connected to Internet.
The application sometimes gets patched (for new functionality); the hardware gets replaced (hard disks die), but the OS is the same from the old times.Of course they simply don't understand why their brand new Windows PCs need all those patches, Antivirus, but eventually crash.Some years ago they considered their application upgrading to a new (GUI/WEB) platform... no more!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288406</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm</title>
	<author>techwrench</author>
	<datestamp>1259660100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Try hitting the 'Escape' key....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Try hitting the 'Escape ' key... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try hitting the 'Escape' key....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286648</id>
	<title>Re:Headline is misleading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259697000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It also appears that the vast majority of cases are caused by poorly written security software (hi Prevx!) doing bad things to your computer. Get AVG or MS Security Essentials and stop paying bad guys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It also appears that the vast majority of cases are caused by poorly written security software ( hi Prevx !
) doing bad things to your computer .
Get AVG or MS Security Essentials and stop paying bad guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It also appears that the vast majority of cases are caused by poorly written security software (hi Prevx!
) doing bad things to your computer.
Get AVG or MS Security Essentials and stop paying bad guys.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285598</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289942</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>FunPika</author>
	<datestamp>1259666580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And since this is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., where everyone brags about their personal machine in their basement, I hope you've never run apt-get update and still run firefox 1.x/2.x (or whatever version was around in 2003).</p></div><p>Firefox!? It was Phoenix/Firebird back then!

God I hope nobody still runs 0.x....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And since this is /. , where everyone brags about their personal machine in their basement , I hope you 've never run apt-get update and still run firefox 1.x/2.x ( or whatever version was around in 2003 ) .Firefox ! ?
It was Phoenix/Firebird back then !
God I hope nobody still runs 0.x... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And since this is /., where everyone brags about their personal machine in their basement, I hope you've never run apt-get update and still run firefox 1.x/2.x (or whatever version was around in 2003).Firefox!?
It was Phoenix/Firebird back then!
God I hope nobody still runs 0.x....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286054</id>
	<title>Hit me twice in 2 days</title>
	<author>Sandbags</author>
	<datestamp>1259695020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>first was while playing a game online, and I though it was the game that crashed.  Black screen, nothing worked, but the background music from the game kept playing.  I waited longer than 5 minutes to see if the game would exit.  When it did not I got suspicios since protected memory in 7 should not have allowed the gamr to crash the kernel.  NOTHIGN was in the error logs related to it (other than the obligitory "you did not shut down properly" errors after I hit the reset button on the tower.</p><p>Next day, I had just turned it on about 20 minutes earlier, and the only thing running was Opera.  Same deal, complete lock up.</p><p>7 has been running great on this machine since the day it hit my MAPS dowload queue and I installed it.  Not one crash prior except an issue installing HP's printer system first time around (second try, it worked flawlessly).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>first was while playing a game online , and I though it was the game that crashed .
Black screen , nothing worked , but the background music from the game kept playing .
I waited longer than 5 minutes to see if the game would exit .
When it did not I got suspicios since protected memory in 7 should not have allowed the gamr to crash the kernel .
NOTHIGN was in the error logs related to it ( other than the obligitory " you did not shut down properly " errors after I hit the reset button on the tower.Next day , I had just turned it on about 20 minutes earlier , and the only thing running was Opera .
Same deal , complete lock up.7 has been running great on this machine since the day it hit my MAPS dowload queue and I installed it .
Not one crash prior except an issue installing HP 's printer system first time around ( second try , it worked flawlessly ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>first was while playing a game online, and I though it was the game that crashed.
Black screen, nothing worked, but the background music from the game kept playing.
I waited longer than 5 minutes to see if the game would exit.
When it did not I got suspicios since protected memory in 7 should not have allowed the gamr to crash the kernel.
NOTHIGN was in the error logs related to it (other than the obligitory "you did not shut down properly" errors after I hit the reset button on the tower.Next day, I had just turned it on about 20 minutes earlier, and the only thing running was Opera.
Same deal, complete lock up.7 has been running great on this machine since the day it hit my MAPS dowload queue and I installed it.
Not one crash prior except an issue installing HP's printer system first time around (second try, it worked flawlessly).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286828</id>
	<title>comparatively...</title>
	<author>fulldecent</author>
	<datestamp>1259697540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt; The error means that users of Windows 7 and earlier operating systems see a totally black screen after logging on to the system<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... well at least its better than Vista.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; The error means that users of Windows 7 and earlier operating systems see a totally black screen after logging on to the system ... well at least its better than Vista .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt; The error means that users of Windows 7 and earlier operating systems see a totally black screen after logging on to the system ... well at least its better than Vista.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259695080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me just start by saying... You are soooo cool.  You're running an Operating System from 2003.  I hope you're not in IT.  I can imagine you telling your management, "we're running Solaris 8/9 and have never applied any patches."  I also hope you're not a developer that has made updates/fixes to your products so you can say to your customers, "How come you've never applied any of my updates? I've slaved over this code for the <b>past seven years!</b>"</p><p>And since this is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., where everyone brags about their personal machine in their basement, I hope you've never run apt-get update and still run firefox 1.x/2.x (or whatever version was around in 2003).</p><p>Or do you think that all fixes in linux/firefox are better than even service packs in winXP...</p><p>I also hope you've never fixed your car or a leaky faucet..</p><p>Because that would make you a hypocrite.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me just start by saying... You are soooo cool .
You 're running an Operating System from 2003 .
I hope you 're not in IT .
I can imagine you telling your management , " we 're running Solaris 8/9 and have never applied any patches .
" I also hope you 're not a developer that has made updates/fixes to your products so you can say to your customers , " How come you 've never applied any of my updates ?
I 've slaved over this code for the past seven years !
" And since this is /. , where everyone brags about their personal machine in their basement , I hope you 've never run apt-get update and still run firefox 1.x/2.x ( or whatever version was around in 2003 ) .Or do you think that all fixes in linux/firefox are better than even service packs in winXP...I also hope you 've never fixed your car or a leaky faucet..Because that would make you a hypocrite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me just start by saying... You are soooo cool.
You're running an Operating System from 2003.
I hope you're not in IT.
I can imagine you telling your management, "we're running Solaris 8/9 and have never applied any patches.
"  I also hope you're not a developer that has made updates/fixes to your products so you can say to your customers, "How come you've never applied any of my updates?
I've slaved over this code for the past seven years!
"And since this is /., where everyone brags about their personal machine in their basement, I hope you've never run apt-get update and still run firefox 1.x/2.x (or whatever version was around in 2003).Or do you think that all fixes in linux/firefox are better than even service packs in winXP...I also hope you've never fixed your car or a leaky faucet..Because that would make you a hypocrite.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286006</id>
	<title>Can confirm the issue from personal experience</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259694840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I removed an expired copy of Kaspersky AV from a Vista laptop yesterday, did a wndows-update and installed free AVG. On rebooting it black-screened. <br> <br>

in that instance another forced reboot brought the system back as normal - I have no explanation</htmltext>
<tokenext>I removed an expired copy of Kaspersky AV from a Vista laptop yesterday , did a wndows-update and installed free AVG .
On rebooting it black-screened .
in that instance another forced reboot brought the system back as normal - I have no explanation</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I removed an expired copy of Kaspersky AV from a Vista laptop yesterday, did a wndows-update and installed free AVG.
On rebooting it black-screened.
in that instance another forced reboot brought the system back as normal - I have no explanation</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286472</id>
	<title>"Last known good configuration"</title>
	<author>Jeffrey\_Walsh VA</author>
	<datestamp>1259696340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have tried LKGC dozens of times when it seemed plausible it would help. I think it worked twice. My experience with System Restore is similar.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have tried LKGC dozens of times when it seemed plausible it would help .
I think it worked twice .
My experience with System Restore is similar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have tried LKGC dozens of times when it seemed plausible it would help.
I think it worked twice.
My experience with System Restore is similar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285752</id>
	<title>They need more control</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259693880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They need to link it to the color picker. Black and Blue really kind of kick you when you're down. Adding bright friendly colors would help soften the experience. If possible adding a splash screen would be nice. "You're Fucked" in big friendly letters would be more helpful than blue or black.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They need to link it to the color picker .
Black and Blue really kind of kick you when you 're down .
Adding bright friendly colors would help soften the experience .
If possible adding a splash screen would be nice .
" You 're Fucked " in big friendly letters would be more helpful than blue or black .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They need to link it to the color picker.
Black and Blue really kind of kick you when you're down.
Adding bright friendly colors would help soften the experience.
If possible adding a splash screen would be nice.
"You're Fucked" in big friendly letters would be more helpful than blue or black.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30294390</id>
	<title>+1 bsod</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259697240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yep booted a laptop (vista 32) after the update. Black screened not responsive. Hard boot again and it started working...</p><p>Love the idea of MS "investigation" to say it did not cause the problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yep booted a laptop ( vista 32 ) after the update .
Black screened not responsive .
Hard boot again and it started working...Love the idea of MS " investigation " to say it did not cause the problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yep booted a laptop (vista 32) after the update.
Black screened not responsive.
Hard boot again and it started working...Love the idea of MS "investigation" to say it did not cause the problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285856</id>
	<title>My bsod experience with vista</title>
	<author>hoytak</author>
	<datestamp>1259694180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On a dual boot system, hadn't used vista in a while.  This is seriously what happened.<br>6 PM or so -- start boot up process into vista.<br>6:45 -- get login screen, then screen goes black.  Hard drive thrashing.<br>7:00 -- screen still black.<br>8:00 -- screen still black, decided to reboot.<br>10 AM -- vista still booting, decided I didn't really need to use vista that bad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On a dual boot system , had n't used vista in a while .
This is seriously what happened.6 PM or so -- start boot up process into vista.6 : 45 -- get login screen , then screen goes black .
Hard drive thrashing.7 : 00 -- screen still black.8 : 00 -- screen still black , decided to reboot.10 AM -- vista still booting , decided I did n't really need to use vista that bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On a dual boot system, hadn't used vista in a while.
This is seriously what happened.6 PM or so -- start boot up process into vista.6:45 -- get login screen, then screen goes black.
Hard drive thrashing.7:00 -- screen still black.8:00 -- screen still black, decided to reboot.10 AM -- vista still booting, decided I didn't really need to use vista that bad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286912</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>Hyppy</author>
	<datestamp>1259697840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I hope you're not in IT.  I can imagine you telling your management, "we're running Solaris 8/9 and have never applied any patches."</p></div><p>I'm in IT.  We run Solaris 8 and Solaris 9, both with \_no\_ patches.  Not even the daylight savings ones, which means we have to, twice a year, reset all the clocks at 2 AM.</p><p>Of course, that's a risk-averse PHB declaring that from on high, not the other way around.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope you 're not in IT .
I can imagine you telling your management , " we 're running Solaris 8/9 and have never applied any patches .
" I 'm in IT .
We run Solaris 8 and Solaris 9 , both with \ _no \ _ patches .
Not even the daylight savings ones , which means we have to , twice a year , reset all the clocks at 2 AM.Of course , that 's a risk-averse PHB declaring that from on high , not the other way around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope you're not in IT.
I can imagine you telling your management, "we're running Solaris 8/9 and have never applied any patches.
"I'm in IT.
We run Solaris 8 and Solaris 9, both with \_no\_ patches.
Not even the daylight savings ones, which means we have to, twice a year, reset all the clocks at 2 AM.Of course, that's a risk-averse PHB declaring that from on high, not the other way around.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285626</id>
	<title>Been there...</title>
	<author>WDancer</author>
	<datestamp>1259693460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This happened at my workplace, and I was the one who had to fix it.  I think it was a corrupted update for XP, because it happened right after one.  I had to perform a repair using the install disk, fun.  Not all were affected, just the ones that had auto update turned on, instead of just notification.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This happened at my workplace , and I was the one who had to fix it .
I think it was a corrupted update for XP , because it happened right after one .
I had to perform a repair using the install disk , fun .
Not all were affected , just the ones that had auto update turned on , instead of just notification .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This happened at my workplace, and I was the one who had to fix it.
I think it was a corrupted update for XP, because it happened right after one.
I had to perform a repair using the install disk, fun.
Not all were affected, just the ones that had auto update turned on, instead of just notification.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285776</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>Icegryphon</author>
	<datestamp>1259694000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No sure way to make sure it bluescreen is to install drivers for SATA card or Soundcard on Windows 2003.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No sure way to make sure it bluescreen is to install drivers for SATA card or Soundcard on Windows 2003 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No sure way to make sure it bluescreen is to install drivers for SATA card or Soundcard on Windows 2003.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285852</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>Bourdain</author>
	<datestamp>1259694180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mod parent up <br>
----- <br>
 <br>
I only use minimal manual antivirus (mostly just with www.virustotal.com on occasional suspect files) and work behind a firewall
 <br>
 <br>
I've installed the service packs after they've been out for a while, but that's really it
 <br> <br>
the most dangerous activity -- web browsing -- is made nearly perfectly safe by using firefox + noscript</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod parent up ----- I only use minimal manual antivirus ( mostly just with www.virustotal.com on occasional suspect files ) and work behind a firewall I 've installed the service packs after they 've been out for a while , but that 's really it the most dangerous activity -- web browsing -- is made nearly perfectly safe by using firefox + noscript</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod parent up 
----- 
 
I only use minimal manual antivirus (mostly just with www.virustotal.com on occasional suspect files) and work behind a firewall
 
 
I've installed the service packs after they've been out for a while, but that's really it
  
the most dangerous activity -- web browsing -- is made nearly perfectly safe by using firefox + noscript</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287518</id>
	<title>Re:Hit me twice in 2 days</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1259699940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My daughter and I have been having the black screen while playing Champions Online on my XP media center machine, which worked fine until a few days ago. First it blew up my video card. I replaced that, it still locks up after playing the game for too long. I bought new DRAM today to see if more memory would help; I should have known the actual problem was caused by Microsoft.<br> <br>
The problem with Windows Automatic Update is that as soon as M$ wants everybody to move off of XP and/or Vista, they can just issue a patch that breaks the old system. Presto -- new OS revenue!<br> <br>Has anybody tried using system restore to a checkpoint before November 25 to see if it fixes the problem?</htmltext>
<tokenext>My daughter and I have been having the black screen while playing Champions Online on my XP media center machine , which worked fine until a few days ago .
First it blew up my video card .
I replaced that , it still locks up after playing the game for too long .
I bought new DRAM today to see if more memory would help ; I should have known the actual problem was caused by Microsoft .
The problem with Windows Automatic Update is that as soon as M $ wants everybody to move off of XP and/or Vista , they can just issue a patch that breaks the old system .
Presto -- new OS revenue !
Has anybody tried using system restore to a checkpoint before November 25 to see if it fixes the problem ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My daughter and I have been having the black screen while playing Champions Online on my XP media center machine, which worked fine until a few days ago.
First it blew up my video card.
I replaced that, it still locks up after playing the game for too long.
I bought new DRAM today to see if more memory would help; I should have known the actual problem was caused by Microsoft.
The problem with Windows Automatic Update is that as soon as M$ wants everybody to move off of XP and/or Vista, they can just issue a patch that breaks the old system.
Presto -- new OS revenue!
Has anybody tried using system restore to a checkpoint before November 25 to see if it fixes the problem?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288658</id>
	<title>Re:BSOD</title>
	<author>linhux</author>
	<datestamp>1259661060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, you're angry. But it makes me curious - what troubleshooting options have you tried? Booting from installation media? Reset PRAM? Booting from an external hard disk? Putting the computer in Target Disk Mode and examining the logs from another computer?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , you 're angry .
But it makes me curious - what troubleshooting options have you tried ?
Booting from installation media ?
Reset PRAM ?
Booting from an external hard disk ?
Putting the computer in Target Disk Mode and examining the logs from another computer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, you're angry.
But it makes me curious - what troubleshooting options have you tried?
Booting from installation media?
Reset PRAM?
Booting from an external hard disk?
Putting the computer in Target Disk Mode and examining the logs from another computer?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286160</id>
	<title>Re:Had this myself.. not a showstopper</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259695380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just unplugged my mass storage device (card reader) and it popped right up.  Couldn't use the card reader after that though, but everything else was ok.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just unplugged my mass storage device ( card reader ) and it popped right up .
Could n't use the card reader after that though , but everything else was ok .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just unplugged my mass storage device (card reader) and it popped right up.
Couldn't use the card reader after that though, but everything else was ok.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285528</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285544</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>Blue Stone</author>
	<datestamp>1259693100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft felt guilty about not allowing you to change the desktop picture in Windows Starter Edition, so they realeased this variation of the BSoD to everyone, to make up for it.</p><p>See: they're not totally evil*.</p><p>*may be totally evil</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft felt guilty about not allowing you to change the desktop picture in Windows Starter Edition , so they realeased this variation of the BSoD to everyone , to make up for it.See : they 're not totally evil * .
* may be totally evil</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft felt guilty about not allowing you to change the desktop picture in Windows Starter Edition, so they realeased this variation of the BSoD to everyone, to make up for it.See: they're not totally evil*.
*may be totally evil</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285646</id>
	<title>Re:Nice of them to change the color</title>
	<author>ciaohound</author>
	<datestamp>1259693520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Black is the new blue?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Black is the new blue ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Black is the new blue?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286320</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>DerKlempner</author>
	<datestamp>1259695920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Eventually, even Microsoft had to learn that black is the new blue.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Eventually , even Microsoft had to learn that black is the new blue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eventually, even Microsoft had to learn that black is the new blue.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289448</id>
	<title>Did anyone else notice...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259664660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... that Tuesday is the 24th, not 25th.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... that Tuesday is the 24th , not 25th .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... that Tuesday is the 24th, not 25th.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286682</id>
	<title>Re:patches may make Win 7 not genuine</title>
	<author>Zumbs</author>
	<datestamp>1259697120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Excuse me, but<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I thought that pretty much everyone with some technical experience knows that you never, ever use the upgrade option with Windows. Always use the clean install if possible.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Excuse me , but ... I thought that pretty much everyone with some technical experience knows that you never , ever use the upgrade option with Windows .
Always use the clean install if possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Excuse me, but ... I thought that pretty much everyone with some technical experience knows that you never, ever use the upgrade option with Windows.
Always use the clean install if possible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285704</id>
	<title>Re:The more things change</title>
	<author>Verteiron</author>
	<datestamp>1259693760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you gaze into Windows long enough, Windows gazes also into you...</p><p>*slain by zombie Nietzsche*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you gaze into Windows long enough , Windows gazes also into you... * slain by zombie Nietzsche *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you gaze into Windows long enough, Windows gazes also into you...*slain by zombie Nietzsche*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286490</id>
	<title>Re:Can confirm the issue from personal experience</title>
	<author>miknix</author>
	<datestamp>1259696460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I removed an expired copy of Kaspersky AV from a Vista laptop yesterday, did a wndows-update and installed free AVG. On rebooting it black-screened.</p><p>in that instance another forced reboot brought the system back as normal - I have no explanation</p></div><p>You could have pressed ctrl+alt+f1, login and read ~/.xsession-errors to see what happened. Oh<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... wait!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I removed an expired copy of Kaspersky AV from a Vista laptop yesterday , did a wndows-update and installed free AVG .
On rebooting it black-screened.in that instance another forced reboot brought the system back as normal - I have no explanationYou could have pressed ctrl + alt + f1 , login and read ~ /.xsession-errors to see what happened .
Oh ... wait !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I removed an expired copy of Kaspersky AV from a Vista laptop yesterday, did a wndows-update and installed free AVG.
On rebooting it black-screened.in that instance another forced reboot brought the system back as normal - I have no explanationYou could have pressed ctrl+alt+f1, login and read ~/.xsession-errors to see what happened.
Oh ... wait!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287602</id>
	<title>nothing new</title>
	<author>strstr</author>
	<datestamp>1259700120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This problem has existed in Windows for ages, and it's probably a problem caused by third party software and drivers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This problem has existed in Windows for ages , and it 's probably a problem caused by third party software and drivers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This problem has existed in Windows for ages, and it's probably a problem caused by third party software and drivers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288970</id>
	<title>Well, at least they changed thecolor</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1259662320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Blue. It's so pre-economic crash.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Blue .
It 's so pre-economic crash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blue.
It's so pre-economic crash.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286020</id>
	<title>Re:BSOD</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1259694900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>APPLE'S  NOT ANY BETTER!!!  THEY KILLED MY MAC!</p><p>I just tried to install security update 2009-005, and after I rebooted my Mac, that was it.  Dead.  It refuses to relaod the OS and just sits there with that pissant spining wheel.And when I called Apple they reufssed to help.  Burn in hell,Apl;e!  Jsut bunr in hlel! I amnever, vneve r,evner go to buy another one fo tyoyur products.</p><p>Adn don';t rtlell em I don't ahve a right ot abe anhry.`  That's almsot $2000 donw the drasin.  {Pcir of' shit.  Macintopsh pioce odf dhuisdt</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>APPLE 'S NOT ANY BETTER ! ! !
THEY KILLED MY MAC ! I just tried to install security update 2009-005 , and after I rebooted my Mac , that was it .
Dead. It refuses to relaod the OS and just sits there with that pissant spining wheel.And when I called Apple they reufssed to help .
Burn in hell,Apl ; e !
Jsut bunr in hlel !
I amnever , vneve r,evner go to buy another one fo tyoyur products.Adn don ' ; t rtlell em I do n't ahve a right ot abe anhry. ` That 's almsot $ 2000 donw the drasin .
{ Pcir of ' shit .
Macintopsh pioce odf dhuisdt</tokentext>
<sentencetext>APPLE'S  NOT ANY BETTER!!!
THEY KILLED MY MAC!I just tried to install security update 2009-005, and after I rebooted my Mac, that was it.
Dead.  It refuses to relaod the OS and just sits there with that pissant spining wheel.And when I called Apple they reufssed to help.
Burn in hell,Apl;e!
Jsut bunr in hlel!
I amnever, vneve r,evner go to buy another one fo tyoyur products.Adn don';t rtlell em I don't ahve a right ot abe anhry.`  That's almsot $2000 donw the drasin.
{Pcir of' shit.
Macintopsh pioce odf dhuisdt</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286430</id>
	<title>Re:Headline is misleading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259696220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That should be "<b>a</b>ffects most versions" and "A<b>n</b> ACL bug".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That should be " affects most versions " and " An ACL bug " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That should be "affects most versions" and "An ACL bug".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285598</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289012</id>
	<title>MS in denial mode</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1259662560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MS hasn't learned from Vista at all. One of the biggest mistakes they did with Vista was not admitting people are actually having problems and treated them (their customers) as bunch of morons not knowing how to use their OS.</p><p>Windows 7 shipped and MS really got some credit from media this time, even from Mac fanatics. This thing happens and if you read MS responses, they are in denial mode just like first days of Vista.</p><p>How many Stanford etc. geniuses it takes to do a basic thing like "We hear you, we will investigate the issue and we aren't going home until we figure it out.". Forget official announcement, what about a fake leak on some easy to find site that will signal that you are aware of the issue?</p><p>Does MS believe in some evil plot against them now? Like, all those comments etc. are written by Steve Jobs&amp;Linus together?</p><p>ps: Could you imagine a Quicktime component could prevent OS X from booting? I saw it, reported, Apple thanked me and fixed it overnight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MS has n't learned from Vista at all .
One of the biggest mistakes they did with Vista was not admitting people are actually having problems and treated them ( their customers ) as bunch of morons not knowing how to use their OS.Windows 7 shipped and MS really got some credit from media this time , even from Mac fanatics .
This thing happens and if you read MS responses , they are in denial mode just like first days of Vista.How many Stanford etc .
geniuses it takes to do a basic thing like " We hear you , we will investigate the issue and we are n't going home until we figure it out. " .
Forget official announcement , what about a fake leak on some easy to find site that will signal that you are aware of the issue ? Does MS believe in some evil plot against them now ?
Like , all those comments etc .
are written by Steve Jobs&amp;Linus together ? ps : Could you imagine a Quicktime component could prevent OS X from booting ?
I saw it , reported , Apple thanked me and fixed it overnight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MS hasn't learned from Vista at all.
One of the biggest mistakes they did with Vista was not admitting people are actually having problems and treated them (their customers) as bunch of morons not knowing how to use their OS.Windows 7 shipped and MS really got some credit from media this time, even from Mac fanatics.
This thing happens and if you read MS responses, they are in denial mode just like first days of Vista.How many Stanford etc.
geniuses it takes to do a basic thing like "We hear you, we will investigate the issue and we aren't going home until we figure it out.".
Forget official announcement, what about a fake leak on some easy to find site that will signal that you are aware of the issue?Does MS believe in some evil plot against them now?
Like, all those comments etc.
are written by Steve Jobs&amp;Linus together?ps: Could you imagine a Quicktime component could prevent OS X from booting?
I saw it, reported, Apple thanked me and fixed it overnight.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287842</id>
	<title>Re:Heh, simple. Don't update.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259701140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>don't use apt-get, use aptitude.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>do n't use apt-get , use aptitude .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>don't use apt-get, use aptitude.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30292958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30290316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30296496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288658
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30292734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30292152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30295158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30299724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288406
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30294246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287598
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30291462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30304482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30291602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30292402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30322348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30297720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30290078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30294678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1725249_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285752
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286862
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285748
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287518
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30292734
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289012
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286828
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30291462
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289368
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289064
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30294678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286368
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30295158
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286472
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287370
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285652
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30322348
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30296496
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287076
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286894
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286528
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285548
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285776
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286000
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286196
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287800
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285544
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285598
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285576
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285846
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30304482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286020
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288658
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286972
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287660
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30292402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286006
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287872
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286490
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288200
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287532
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286682
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30292152
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288982
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30294246
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30299724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285892
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286106
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287822
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286144
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288406
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287612
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286900
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288968
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289198
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289754
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30297720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287730
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30290078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286074
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288334
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289942
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30291602
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287598
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286832
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286912
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286896
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287842
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288514
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285792
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285852
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286216
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286558
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285666
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287648
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30292958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30290316
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286120
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1725249.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30285550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30288184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30287812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286570
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30286272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1725249.30289518
</commentlist>
</conversation>
