<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_27_1646221</id>
	<title>Plasma Device Kills Bacteria On Skin In Seconds</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1259347140000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://poncacityweloveyou.com/" rel="nofollow">Ponca City, We love you</a> writes <i>"In medicine, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma\_(physics)">plasma, the fourth state of matter</a>, is already used for sterilizing surgical instruments; plasma works at the atomic level and is able to reach all surfaces, even the interior of hollow needle ends. Now the BBC reports that researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics have demonstrated a plasma device that can <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8379604.stm">rid hands, feet, or even underarms of bacteria, including the hospital superbug MRSA</a>, by creating cold atmospheric plasma that produces a cocktail of chemicals that kills bacteria but is harmless to skin. 'The plasma produces a series of over 200 chemical reactions that involve the oxygen and nitrogen in air plus water vapor &mdash; <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091126083409.htm">there is a whole concoction of chemical species that can be lethal to bacteria</a>,' says Gregor Morfill. 'It's actually similar to what our own immune system does.' The team says that an exposure to the plasma of only about 12 seconds reduces the incidence of bacteria, viruses, and fungi on hands by a factor of a million &mdash; a number that stands in sharp contrast to the several minutes hospital staff can take to wash using traditional soap and water. Morfill says that the approach can be used to kill the bacteria that lead to everything from gum disease to body odor and that the prototype is scalable to any size and can be produced in any shape."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ponca City , We love you writes " In medicine , plasma , the fourth state of matter , is already used for sterilizing surgical instruments ; plasma works at the atomic level and is able to reach all surfaces , even the interior of hollow needle ends .
Now the BBC reports that researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics have demonstrated a plasma device that can rid hands , feet , or even underarms of bacteria , including the hospital superbug MRSA , by creating cold atmospheric plasma that produces a cocktail of chemicals that kills bacteria but is harmless to skin .
'The plasma produces a series of over 200 chemical reactions that involve the oxygen and nitrogen in air plus water vapor    there is a whole concoction of chemical species that can be lethal to bacteria, ' says Gregor Morfill .
'It 's actually similar to what our own immune system does .
' The team says that an exposure to the plasma of only about 12 seconds reduces the incidence of bacteria , viruses , and fungi on hands by a factor of a million    a number that stands in sharp contrast to the several minutes hospital staff can take to wash using traditional soap and water .
Morfill says that the approach can be used to kill the bacteria that lead to everything from gum disease to body odor and that the prototype is scalable to any size and can be produced in any shape .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ponca City, We love you writes "In medicine, plasma, the fourth state of matter, is already used for sterilizing surgical instruments; plasma works at the atomic level and is able to reach all surfaces, even the interior of hollow needle ends.
Now the BBC reports that researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics have demonstrated a plasma device that can rid hands, feet, or even underarms of bacteria, including the hospital superbug MRSA, by creating cold atmospheric plasma that produces a cocktail of chemicals that kills bacteria but is harmless to skin.
'The plasma produces a series of over 200 chemical reactions that involve the oxygen and nitrogen in air plus water vapor — there is a whole concoction of chemical species that can be lethal to bacteria,' says Gregor Morfill.
'It's actually similar to what our own immune system does.
' The team says that an exposure to the plasma of only about 12 seconds reduces the incidence of bacteria, viruses, and fungi on hands by a factor of a million — a number that stands in sharp contrast to the several minutes hospital staff can take to wash using traditional soap and water.
Morfill says that the approach can be used to kill the bacteria that lead to everything from gum disease to body odor and that the prototype is scalable to any size and can be produced in any shape.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247788</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>Eudial</author>
	<datestamp>1259352600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They do actually correspond pretty well, but that is only when you ignore the states of matter that occur at very low temperatures (superfluids, superconductors, Bose-Einstein condensates) and at very high temperatures (quark-gluon plasma).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They do actually correspond pretty well , but that is only when you ignore the states of matter that occur at very low temperatures ( superfluids , superconductors , Bose-Einstein condensates ) and at very high temperatures ( quark-gluon plasma ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They do actually correspond pretty well, but that is only when you ignore the states of matter that occur at very low temperatures (superfluids, superconductors, Bose-Einstein condensates) and at very high temperatures (quark-gluon plasma).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30269224</id>
	<title>Re:Resistance?</title>
	<author>aug24</author>
	<datestamp>1259591460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly as soon as we see cows evolving resistance to chainsaws.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly as soon as we see cows evolving resistance to chainsaws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly as soon as we see cows evolving resistance to chainsaws.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30251482</id>
	<title>Re:sweet</title>
	<author>Walkingshark</author>
	<datestamp>1259331240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd rather have a sonic screwdriver.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather have a sonic screwdriver .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather have a sonic screwdriver.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248996</id>
	<title>Re:Excessive cleanliness</title>
	<author>DoofusOfDeath</author>
	<datestamp>1259316780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Don't know about you kid, but a doc sticking his hand into my insides is one of those situations where I'm willing to forego the 'benefit' of having my immune system stimulated by germs being introduced in the process and ask him to wash up.</p></div></blockquote><p>And just pray that it's his hands that go under the plasma.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't know about you kid , but a doc sticking his hand into my insides is one of those situations where I 'm willing to forego the 'benefit ' of having my immune system stimulated by germs being introduced in the process and ask him to wash up.And just pray that it 's his hands that go under the plasma .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't know about you kid, but a doc sticking his hand into my insides is one of those situations where I'm willing to forego the 'benefit' of having my immune system stimulated by germs being introduced in the process and ask him to wash up.And just pray that it's his hands that go under the plasma.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30251974</id>
	<title>I Always Wanted To Try..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259336520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The sonic shower. I guess it will be a plasma sink first though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The sonic shower .
I guess it will be a plasma sink first though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The sonic shower.
I guess it will be a plasma sink first though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249048</id>
	<title>Re:Kick-ass for hospitals</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1259316960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There&rsquo;s this thing called &ldquo;gloves&rdquo;, you know. Just use the condom-like types, that don&rsquo;t look as if you don&rsquo;t want to touch the patient, and a bit of self-confidence to overcome stupid comments from stupid people, and you&rsquo;re good.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There    s this thing called    gloves    , you know .
Just use the condom-like types , that don    t look as if you don    t want to touch the patient , and a bit of self-confidence to overcome stupid comments from stupid people , and you    re good .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There’s this thing called “gloves”, you know.
Just use the condom-like types, that don’t look as if you don’t want to touch the patient, and a bit of self-confidence to overcome stupid comments from stupid people, and you’re good.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248200</id>
	<title>Re:Resistance?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259355180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You don't develop a resistance to that.</p></div><p>... unless you're Chuck Norris.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't develop a resistance to that.... unless you 're Chuck Norris .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't develop a resistance to that.... unless you're Chuck Norris.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248860</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>baKanale</author>
	<datestamp>1259316120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But what about heart?  Without heart you don't get Captain Planet!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But what about heart ?
Without heart you do n't get Captain Planet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But what about heart?
Without heart you don't get Captain Planet!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247860</id>
	<title>Re:Excessive cleanliness</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1259353080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly. I can remember the explanation, that our whole skin in 100\% covered is a layer of bacteria. And that those <em>good</em> bacteria prevent the settling of <em>bad</em> bacterial. Which is an important part of what keeps us healthy.</p><p>It&rsquo;s the same thing as in the stomach. No bacteria, no digestion! I once had a bad settlement of a very dominating helicobacter. Man, you&rsquo;re fucked, if something bad comes along. That little shithead (not even an insult in this case ^^) not only wrecked my whole digestion, but created a massive amount of heartburn (is that the proper English word?) and loads of pain, which was so bad, that it ran into my lungs, and caused me to wake up at night with the inability to breathe, because of the acid in my bronchial tube! I had to breathe veeery calm and slowly, while I was literally already suffocating to begin with. (That&rsquo;s why I woke up.) I thought I&rsquo;d die!<br>It even wrecked my mood because of sleep deprivation, the pain, and because it&rsquo;s known to tweak your mood.</p><p>I don&rsquo;t know what can happen to your skin, if you wreck your protective perimeter, but I bet it&rsquo;s something pretty nasty like putrescent moldy skin and rashes, or something like that. Yeah, very &ldquo;clean&rdquo;. ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
I can remember the explanation , that our whole skin in 100 \ % covered is a layer of bacteria .
And that those good bacteria prevent the settling of bad bacterial .
Which is an important part of what keeps us healthy.It    s the same thing as in the stomach .
No bacteria , no digestion !
I once had a bad settlement of a very dominating helicobacter .
Man , you    re fucked , if something bad comes along .
That little shithead ( not even an insult in this case ^ ^ ) not only wrecked my whole digestion , but created a massive amount of heartburn ( is that the proper English word ?
) and loads of pain , which was so bad , that it ran into my lungs , and caused me to wake up at night with the inability to breathe , because of the acid in my bronchial tube !
I had to breathe veeery calm and slowly , while I was literally already suffocating to begin with .
( That    s why I woke up .
) I thought I    d die ! It even wrecked my mood because of sleep deprivation , the pain , and because it    s known to tweak your mood.I don    t know what can happen to your skin , if you wreck your protective perimeter , but I bet it    s something pretty nasty like putrescent moldy skin and rashes , or something like that .
Yeah , very    clean    .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
I can remember the explanation, that our whole skin in 100\% covered is a layer of bacteria.
And that those good bacteria prevent the settling of bad bacterial.
Which is an important part of what keeps us healthy.It’s the same thing as in the stomach.
No bacteria, no digestion!
I once had a bad settlement of a very dominating helicobacter.
Man, you’re fucked, if something bad comes along.
That little shithead (not even an insult in this case ^^) not only wrecked my whole digestion, but created a massive amount of heartburn (is that the proper English word?
) and loads of pain, which was so bad, that it ran into my lungs, and caused me to wake up at night with the inability to breathe, because of the acid in my bronchial tube!
I had to breathe veeery calm and slowly, while I was literally already suffocating to begin with.
(That’s why I woke up.
) I thought I’d die!It even wrecked my mood because of sleep deprivation, the pain, and because it’s known to tweak your mood.I don’t know what can happen to your skin, if you wreck your protective perimeter, but I bet it’s something pretty nasty like putrescent moldy skin and rashes, or something like that.
Yeah, very “clean”.
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247642</id>
	<title>Re:Resistance?</title>
	<author>Chyeld</author>
	<datestamp>1259351640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In order to grow resistance, you have to leave a few alive and they have to have been left alive due in some part to something in their makeup causing them to be less vulnerable to the 'weapon'.</p><p>In other words, something that lived only because it was never touched isn't going to evolve into the superbug.</p><p>This eradicates the germs, they aren't being poisoned or having their chemical processes blocked (which is what most antibiotics do), it's ripping the germs apart at the atomic level. You don't develop a resistance to that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In order to grow resistance , you have to leave a few alive and they have to have been left alive due in some part to something in their makeup causing them to be less vulnerable to the 'weapon'.In other words , something that lived only because it was never touched is n't going to evolve into the superbug.This eradicates the germs , they are n't being poisoned or having their chemical processes blocked ( which is what most antibiotics do ) , it 's ripping the germs apart at the atomic level .
You do n't develop a resistance to that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In order to grow resistance, you have to leave a few alive and they have to have been left alive due in some part to something in their makeup causing them to be less vulnerable to the 'weapon'.In other words, something that lived only because it was never touched isn't going to evolve into the superbug.This eradicates the germs, they aren't being poisoned or having their chemical processes blocked (which is what most antibiotics do), it's ripping the germs apart at the atomic level.
You don't develop a resistance to that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30253502</id>
	<title>Re:Resistance?</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1259407080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>TFS&gt; The team says that an exposure to the plasma of only about 12 seconds reduces the incidence of bacteria, viruses, and fungi on hands by a factor of a million<br><br>Given that bacteria aren't generally counted by the baker's dozen, I'd say a proverbial handful still survives after 12 seconds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>TFS &gt; The team says that an exposure to the plasma of only about 12 seconds reduces the incidence of bacteria , viruses , and fungi on hands by a factor of a millionGiven that bacteria are n't generally counted by the baker 's dozen , I 'd say a proverbial handful still survives after 12 seconds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFS&gt; The team says that an exposure to the plasma of only about 12 seconds reduces the incidence of bacteria, viruses, and fungi on hands by a factor of a millionGiven that bacteria aren't generally counted by the baker's dozen, I'd say a proverbial handful still survives after 12 seconds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30250040</id>
	<title>Re:Resistance?</title>
	<author>Chyeld</author>
	<datestamp>1259322000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are the sort of person who thought <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomsday\_(comics)" title="wikipedia.org">Doomsday</a> [wikipedia.org] was a plausible character, aren't you?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are the sort of person who thought Doomsday [ wikipedia.org ] was a plausible character , are n't you ?
: -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are the sort of person who thought Doomsday [wikipedia.org] was a plausible character, aren't you?
:-P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247568</id>
	<title>Pizza Analogy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259351220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's like if someone made an inappropriate pizza analogy and got horribly meme-ed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like if someone made an inappropriate pizza analogy and got horribly meme-ed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like if someone made an inappropriate pizza analogy and got horribly meme-ed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247928</id>
	<title>Re:Resistance?</title>
	<author>DarrenBaker</author>
	<datestamp>1259353320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hence why the alcohol hand washes don't create superbugs either - it just kills them wholesale, and developing an immunity to it is highly unlikely.</p><p>Now, if they could just do something like this that would kill viruses. We all know someone using Purel like it's going out of fashion because they think it's protecting them against H1N1... What if we actually had something that could (aside from hand-washing, of course)?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hence why the alcohol hand washes do n't create superbugs either - it just kills them wholesale , and developing an immunity to it is highly unlikely.Now , if they could just do something like this that would kill viruses .
We all know someone using Purel like it 's going out of fashion because they think it 's protecting them against H1N1... What if we actually had something that could ( aside from hand-washing , of course ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hence why the alcohol hand washes don't create superbugs either - it just kills them wholesale, and developing an immunity to it is highly unlikely.Now, if they could just do something like this that would kill viruses.
We all know someone using Purel like it's going out of fashion because they think it's protecting them against H1N1... What if we actually had something that could (aside from hand-washing, of course)?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247864</id>
	<title>Re:Good bacteria?</title>
	<author>deprecated</author>
	<datestamp>1259353080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They die.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They die .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They die.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30278192</id>
	<title>Re:Resistance?</title>
	<author>DaleSwanson</author>
	<datestamp>1259591880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://microbiology.suite101.com/article.cfm/alcohol\_based\_hand\_cleansers" title="suite101.com" rel="nofollow">http://microbiology.suite101.com/article.cfm/alcohol\_based\_hand\_cleansers</a> [suite101.com]<br><a href="http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/qa.htm#e" title="cdc.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/qa.htm#e</a> [cdc.gov]</p><p>What kills influenza virus?<br>Influenza virus is destroyed by heat (167-212F [75-100C]). In addition, several chemical germicides, including chlorine, hydrogen peroxide, detergents (soap), iodophors (iodine-based antiseptics), and alcohols are effective against human influenza viruses if used in proper concentration for a sufficient length of time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //microbiology.suite101.com/article.cfm/alcohol \ _based \ _hand \ _cleansers [ suite101.com ] http : //www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/qa.htm # e [ cdc.gov ] What kills influenza virus ? Influenza virus is destroyed by heat ( 167-212F [ 75-100C ] ) .
In addition , several chemical germicides , including chlorine , hydrogen peroxide , detergents ( soap ) , iodophors ( iodine-based antiseptics ) , and alcohols are effective against human influenza viruses if used in proper concentration for a sufficient length of time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://microbiology.suite101.com/article.cfm/alcohol\_based\_hand\_cleansers [suite101.com]http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/qa.htm#e [cdc.gov]What kills influenza virus?Influenza virus is destroyed by heat (167-212F [75-100C]).
In addition, several chemical germicides, including chlorine, hydrogen peroxide, detergents (soap), iodophors (iodine-based antiseptics), and alcohols are effective against human influenza viruses if used in proper concentration for a sufficient length of time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248036</id>
	<title>Re:Excessive cleanliness</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1259353980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These are not being suggested for in-home or preschool whole body sanitizing. They're suggested for doctors or nurses working on people with infectious diseases and potentially compromised immune systems. The problem of excessive clenliness isn't caused by washing up, it's caused by obsessively slathering your child in sanitizing gel whenever he might have (god forbid) touched something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These are not being suggested for in-home or preschool whole body sanitizing .
They 're suggested for doctors or nurses working on people with infectious diseases and potentially compromised immune systems .
The problem of excessive clenliness is n't caused by washing up , it 's caused by obsessively slathering your child in sanitizing gel whenever he might have ( god forbid ) touched something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These are not being suggested for in-home or preschool whole body sanitizing.
They're suggested for doctors or nurses working on people with infectious diseases and potentially compromised immune systems.
The problem of excessive clenliness isn't caused by washing up, it's caused by obsessively slathering your child in sanitizing gel whenever he might have (god forbid) touched something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247544</id>
	<title>Gets rid of body odor?</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1259351160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When does it come in gift size?</htmltext>
<tokenext>When does it come in gift size ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When does it come in gift size?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247558</id>
	<title>Re:Excessive cleanliness</title>
	<author>Chyeld</author>
	<datestamp>1259351160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't know about you kid, but a doc sticking his hand into my insides is one of those situations where I'm willing to forego the 'benefit' of having my immune system stimulated by germs being introduced in the process and ask him to wash up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't know about you kid , but a doc sticking his hand into my insides is one of those situations where I 'm willing to forego the 'benefit ' of having my immune system stimulated by germs being introduced in the process and ask him to wash up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't know about you kid, but a doc sticking his hand into my insides is one of those situations where I'm willing to forego the 'benefit' of having my immune system stimulated by germs being introduced in the process and ask him to wash up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30253478</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1259406780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I never thought about that, really. There are superficial parallels, too: solid/earth, liquid/water, gas/air and plasma/fire.<br><br>I wonder what distorted picture is gonna be left of *our* knowledge in a couple of thousand years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I never thought about that , really .
There are superficial parallels , too : solid/earth , liquid/water , gas/air and plasma/fire.I wonder what distorted picture is gon na be left of * our * knowledge in a couple of thousand years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never thought about that, really.
There are superficial parallels, too: solid/earth, liquid/water, gas/air and plasma/fire.I wonder what distorted picture is gonna be left of *our* knowledge in a couple of thousand years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248608</id>
	<title>Re:Surface only, though?</title>
	<author>mhelander</author>
	<datestamp>1259314620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps the techniques could be combined (washing + plasma nuking)?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps the techniques could be combined ( washing + plasma nuking ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps the techniques could be combined (washing + plasma nuking)?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30251866</id>
	<title>Re:Resistance?</title>
	<author>Renraku</author>
	<datestamp>1259335320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"This eradicates the germs, they aren't being poisoned or having their chemical processes blocked (which is what most antibiotics do), it's ripping the germs apart at the atomic level. You don't develop a resistance to that."</p><p>Actually, resistance was already developed from it.  You know, life on Earth isn't mostly carbon based out of chance.  Carbon forms bonds that are easy to work with, but aren't susceptible to being torn apart easily.  It can form up to four bonds, including double or triple bonds, and good luck trying to break a triple bond without a few kJ of energy in the right spot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" This eradicates the germs , they are n't being poisoned or having their chemical processes blocked ( which is what most antibiotics do ) , it 's ripping the germs apart at the atomic level .
You do n't develop a resistance to that .
" Actually , resistance was already developed from it .
You know , life on Earth is n't mostly carbon based out of chance .
Carbon forms bonds that are easy to work with , but are n't susceptible to being torn apart easily .
It can form up to four bonds , including double or triple bonds , and good luck trying to break a triple bond without a few kJ of energy in the right spot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"This eradicates the germs, they aren't being poisoned or having their chemical processes blocked (which is what most antibiotics do), it's ripping the germs apart at the atomic level.
You don't develop a resistance to that.
"Actually, resistance was already developed from it.
You know, life on Earth isn't mostly carbon based out of chance.
Carbon forms bonds that are easy to work with, but aren't susceptible to being torn apart easily.
It can form up to four bonds, including double or triple bonds, and good luck trying to break a triple bond without a few kJ of energy in the right spot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247698</id>
	<title>Re:sweet</title>
	<author>weav</author>
	<datestamp>1259352000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A plasma bathtub would be good but what *I* really want is a plasma TOOTHBRUSH...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A plasma bathtub would be good but what * I * really want is a plasma TOOTHBRUSH.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A plasma bathtub would be good but what *I* really want is a plasma TOOTHBRUSH...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247524</id>
	<title>sweet</title>
	<author>spidercoz</author>
	<datestamp>1259351040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I want a plasma bathtub</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want a plasma bathtub</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want a plasma bathtub</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248766</id>
	<title>How long before these are in public restrooms?</title>
	<author>davidwr</author>
	<datestamp>1259315700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll sell my stock in hand-sanitizing gel manufacturers on Monday.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll sell my stock in hand-sanitizing gel manufacturers on Monday .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll sell my stock in hand-sanitizing gel manufacturers on Monday.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248160</id>
	<title>Re:Resistance?</title>
	<author>Profane MuthaFucka</author>
	<datestamp>1259354940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can't become resistant to some things. An example would be, if you burned people to a degree that 90\% of them died, and kept breeding the survivors, you would still not be able to breed a human that was fire resistant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't become resistant to some things .
An example would be , if you burned people to a degree that 90 \ % of them died , and kept breeding the survivors , you would still not be able to breed a human that was fire resistant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't become resistant to some things.
An example would be, if you burned people to a degree that 90\% of them died, and kept breeding the survivors, you would still not be able to breed a human that was fire resistant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247538</id>
	<title>Kick-ass for hospitals</title>
	<author>Aggrajag</author>
	<datestamp>1259351100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>As a nurse I would welcome this as I have to wash and disinfect my hands several times a day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a nurse I would welcome this as I have to wash and disinfect my hands several times a day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a nurse I would welcome this as I have to wash and disinfect my hands several times a day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247952</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>JoshuaZ</author>
	<datestamp>1259353440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, there were 5 elements according to Aristole: Earth, Air, Fire, Water and Aether. The fifth element only appears in the spheres beyond Earth.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle#The\_five\_elements" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle#The\_five\_elements</a> [wikipedia.org]. Post Copernicus, Kepler and Galileo, when it became apparent that objects in space were likely made of the same substances as other elements Aether was dropped. This didn't last long, since the classical elemental theory was already in decline. Robert Boyle's work in The Sceptical Chymist published in 1661 effectively ended the idea of the then four element theory. So four elements was really only an idea with widespread appeal to scientists and thinkers for about 50 years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , there were 5 elements according to Aristole : Earth , Air , Fire , Water and Aether .
The fifth element only appears in the spheres beyond Earth .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle # The \ _five \ _elements [ wikipedia.org ] .
Post Copernicus , Kepler and Galileo , when it became apparent that objects in space were likely made of the same substances as other elements Aether was dropped .
This did n't last long , since the classical elemental theory was already in decline .
Robert Boyle 's work in The Sceptical Chymist published in 1661 effectively ended the idea of the then four element theory .
So four elements was really only an idea with widespread appeal to scientists and thinkers for about 50 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, there were 5 elements according to Aristole: Earth, Air, Fire, Water and Aether.
The fifth element only appears in the spheres beyond Earth.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle#The\_five\_elements [wikipedia.org].
Post Copernicus, Kepler and Galileo, when it became apparent that objects in space were likely made of the same substances as other elements Aether was dropped.
This didn't last long, since the classical elemental theory was already in decline.
Robert Boyle's work in The Sceptical Chymist published in 1661 effectively ended the idea of the then four element theory.
So four elements was really only an idea with widespread appeal to scientists and thinkers for about 50 years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247650</id>
	<title>Re:Excessive cleanliness</title>
	<author>Sycraft-fu</author>
	<datestamp>1259351700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you remember that not everything applies to every situation? Because it doesn't.</p><p>The article about excessive cleanliness was relating to raising children. Basically, our immune systems are like most things in us in that they need to be used to develop. As such children need to get sick to have a well functioning immune system as adults. You don't want to keep them in a sterile environment or they'll never develop defenses.</p><p>However this is for hospitals. There you do want things as clean as possible. You have people who are in weakened states, their ability to fight off disease is less than normal. Also, you are bypassing a lot of their defenses in many cases. Your body is much more difficult to infect via the nose and mouth than directly via an open incision in your chest. As such, maximal clean is desirable.</p><p>This is not an all or nothing thing. Being super clean is not always good or always bad, it depends on the situation. You wouldn't want to buy this for home and turn your house in to a sterile cleanroom from which you never let your kid out. They'd have no immune system and be very vulnerable in the world. However you do want this for hospitals to ensure that wounded and sick people aren't made further sick by an infection that they can't fight in a weakened state.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you remember that not everything applies to every situation ?
Because it does n't.The article about excessive cleanliness was relating to raising children .
Basically , our immune systems are like most things in us in that they need to be used to develop .
As such children need to get sick to have a well functioning immune system as adults .
You do n't want to keep them in a sterile environment or they 'll never develop defenses.However this is for hospitals .
There you do want things as clean as possible .
You have people who are in weakened states , their ability to fight off disease is less than normal .
Also , you are bypassing a lot of their defenses in many cases .
Your body is much more difficult to infect via the nose and mouth than directly via an open incision in your chest .
As such , maximal clean is desirable.This is not an all or nothing thing .
Being super clean is not always good or always bad , it depends on the situation .
You would n't want to buy this for home and turn your house in to a sterile cleanroom from which you never let your kid out .
They 'd have no immune system and be very vulnerable in the world .
However you do want this for hospitals to ensure that wounded and sick people are n't made further sick by an infection that they ca n't fight in a weakened state .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you remember that not everything applies to every situation?
Because it doesn't.The article about excessive cleanliness was relating to raising children.
Basically, our immune systems are like most things in us in that they need to be used to develop.
As such children need to get sick to have a well functioning immune system as adults.
You don't want to keep them in a sterile environment or they'll never develop defenses.However this is for hospitals.
There you do want things as clean as possible.
You have people who are in weakened states, their ability to fight off disease is less than normal.
Also, you are bypassing a lot of their defenses in many cases.
Your body is much more difficult to infect via the nose and mouth than directly via an open incision in your chest.
As such, maximal clean is desirable.This is not an all or nothing thing.
Being super clean is not always good or always bad, it depends on the situation.
You wouldn't want to buy this for home and turn your house in to a sterile cleanroom from which you never let your kid out.
They'd have no immune system and be very vulnerable in the world.
However you do want this for hospitals to ensure that wounded and sick people aren't made further sick by an infection that they can't fight in a weakened state.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249568</id>
	<title>I'll Take a Toothbrush</title>
	<author>dandenoth</author>
	<datestamp>1259319660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Like a poster before me, I'm all about getting one in a toothbrush. I could definitely take 12 seconds to clean off my teeth, rather than the "Five minutes for top teeth, fiver for bottom" that my dentist tells me to do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Like a poster before me , I 'm all about getting one in a toothbrush .
I could definitely take 12 seconds to clean off my teeth , rather than the " Five minutes for top teeth , fiver for bottom " that my dentist tells me to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like a poster before me, I'm all about getting one in a toothbrush.
I could definitely take 12 seconds to clean off my teeth, rather than the "Five minutes for top teeth, fiver for bottom" that my dentist tells me to do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247888</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>DarrenBaker</author>
	<datestamp>1259353140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um, guys? The Fifth Element was LOVE? HELLOOOOOO?</p><p>Nerds... Jeez.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , guys ?
The Fifth Element was LOVE ?
HELLOOOOOO ? Nerds... Jeez .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, guys?
The Fifth Element was LOVE?
HELLOOOOOO?Nerds... Jeez.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247514</id>
	<title>"chemical species"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259350980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30254438</id>
	<title>Re:Resistance?</title>
	<author>Phoghat</author>
	<datestamp>1259422740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"IF" it gets them all, there's no problem. ":IF"it leaves some (even a small amount) behind, you're fucked.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" IF " it gets them all , there 's no problem .
" : IF " it leaves some ( even a small amount ) behind , you 're fucked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"IF" it gets them all, there's no problem.
":IF"it leaves some (even a small amount) behind, you're fucked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249144</id>
	<title>no more showers in the cold winter....</title>
	<author>Emesee</author>
	<datestamp>1259317500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>yay yay yay yay yay.</htmltext>
<tokenext>yay yay yay yay yay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yay yay yay yay yay.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248044</id>
	<title>I predict a new gizmo to treat acne</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259353980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>zap that zit away</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>zap that zit away</tokentext>
<sentencetext>zap that zit away</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249558</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>Scrameustache</author>
	<datestamp>1259319600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But I find it interesting that according to ancient alchemy there were four "elements" (fire, water, earth, and air), and according to modern science there are four "states of matter" (plasma, liquid, solid, and gaseous).</p></div><p>They fit too (plasma = fire, water = liquid, etc), but just to throw a monkey wrench in your "wisdom of the ancient" musings, the Asian alchemists had 5 elements (metal and wood instead of earth, IIRC).</p><p>Now, if you'll excuse me, I'll go re-read Neal Stephenson's Baroque Cycle.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But I find it interesting that according to ancient alchemy there were four " elements " ( fire , water , earth , and air ) , and according to modern science there are four " states of matter " ( plasma , liquid , solid , and gaseous ) .They fit too ( plasma = fire , water = liquid , etc ) , but just to throw a monkey wrench in your " wisdom of the ancient " musings , the Asian alchemists had 5 elements ( metal and wood instead of earth , IIRC ) .Now , if you 'll excuse me , I 'll go re-read Neal Stephenson 's Baroque Cycle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I find it interesting that according to ancient alchemy there were four "elements" (fire, water, earth, and air), and according to modern science there are four "states of matter" (plasma, liquid, solid, and gaseous).They fit too (plasma = fire, water = liquid, etc), but just to throw a monkey wrench in your "wisdom of the ancient" musings, the Asian alchemists had 5 elements (metal and wood instead of earth, IIRC).Now, if you'll excuse me, I'll go re-read Neal Stephenson's Baroque Cycle.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247812</id>
	<title>7 letters</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259352720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lincoln and Kennedy both had 7 letters in their last names.  Both were assassinated.</p><p>Coincidence?  I THINK NOT!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lincoln and Kennedy both had 7 letters in their last names .
Both were assassinated.Coincidence ?
I THINK NOT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lincoln and Kennedy both had 7 letters in their last names.
Both were assassinated.Coincidence?
I THINK NOT!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248012</id>
	<title>Re:Good bacteria?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259353860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I use toilet paper...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I use toilet paper.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use toilet paper...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247926</id>
	<title>Re:Resistance?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259353320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>So how long until we see bacteria resistant to this device?</i></p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; About 20 years after we see bacteria resistant to current gamma ray and UV sterilization techniques. Don't hold your breath. Sterilize means no bacteria or spores survive. Do you think they chose 12 seconds "at random" or because "it sounds cool"? No, 12 seconds is the time (with a probably safety margin built in) at which cultures have shown repeatedly that all bacteria are dead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So how long until we see bacteria resistant to this device ?
      About 20 years after we see bacteria resistant to current gamma ray and UV sterilization techniques .
Do n't hold your breath .
Sterilize means no bacteria or spores survive .
Do you think they chose 12 seconds " at random " or because " it sounds cool " ?
No , 12 seconds is the time ( with a probably safety margin built in ) at which cultures have shown repeatedly that all bacteria are dead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how long until we see bacteria resistant to this device?
      About 20 years after we see bacteria resistant to current gamma ray and UV sterilization techniques.
Don't hold your breath.
Sterilize means no bacteria or spores survive.
Do you think they chose 12 seconds "at random" or because "it sounds cool"?
No, 12 seconds is the time (with a probably safety margin built in) at which cultures have shown repeatedly that all bacteria are dead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248148</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>jbezorg</author>
	<datestamp>1259354820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All I care about are the stones...</htmltext>
<tokenext>All I care about are the stones.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All I care about are the stones...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249134</id>
	<title>Re:Is harmless to skin?</title>
	<author>Urkki</author>
	<datestamp>1259317440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So was phenol, for that matter. If it kills bacteria in 12 seconds, it's "not nice stuff". Oh yeah maybe the keratin on your skin will prevent it from penetrating. What if it gets in your sweat glands. What if your skin has a lesion, and the keratin is interrupted...</p></div><p>Well, soap and water is "not nice stuff" too, if you need to wash your hands all the time, like doctors and nurses <i>should</i> do between meeting patients.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>This one gets filed in the "call me when we've been using it safely for 20 years" category. Until then I will stick to soap and water.</p></div><p>It's also worth noting that this does not remove any bacteria, it just kills them... And also it probably doesn't work as well on dirty hands, the dirt would probably protect the bacteria from plasma reactions. So soap isn't obsolete yet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So was phenol , for that matter .
If it kills bacteria in 12 seconds , it 's " not nice stuff " .
Oh yeah maybe the keratin on your skin will prevent it from penetrating .
What if it gets in your sweat glands .
What if your skin has a lesion , and the keratin is interrupted...Well , soap and water is " not nice stuff " too , if you need to wash your hands all the time , like doctors and nurses should do between meeting patients.This one gets filed in the " call me when we 've been using it safely for 20 years " category .
Until then I will stick to soap and water.It 's also worth noting that this does not remove any bacteria , it just kills them... And also it probably does n't work as well on dirty hands , the dirt would probably protect the bacteria from plasma reactions .
So soap is n't obsolete yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So was phenol, for that matter.
If it kills bacteria in 12 seconds, it's "not nice stuff".
Oh yeah maybe the keratin on your skin will prevent it from penetrating.
What if it gets in your sweat glands.
What if your skin has a lesion, and the keratin is interrupted...Well, soap and water is "not nice stuff" too, if you need to wash your hands all the time, like doctors and nurses should do between meeting patients.This one gets filed in the "call me when we've been using it safely for 20 years" category.
Until then I will stick to soap and water.It's also worth noting that this does not remove any bacteria, it just kills them... And also it probably doesn't work as well on dirty hands, the dirt would probably protect the bacteria from plasma reactions.
So soap isn't obsolete yet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248228</id>
	<title>Re:Kick-ass for hospitals</title>
	<author>godel\_56</author>
	<datestamp>1259355420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As a nurse I would welcome this as I have to wash and disinfect my hands several times a day.</p></div><p>
Only several? That's disturbing. I'd have thought you'd have to wash them after every patient contact.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a nurse I would welcome this as I have to wash and disinfect my hands several times a day .
Only several ?
That 's disturbing .
I 'd have thought you 'd have to wash them after every patient contact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a nurse I would welcome this as I have to wash and disinfect my hands several times a day.
Only several?
That's disturbing.
I'd have thought you'd have to wash them after every patient contact.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247756</id>
	<title>Re:Of course...</title>
	<author>WormholeFiend</author>
	<datestamp>1259352300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The big question is, how soon can we turn this into some sort of weapon?</i></p><p>The device does look like an oven...</p><p>You know who else loved ovens?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The big question is , how soon can we turn this into some sort of weapon ? The device does look like an oven...You know who else loved ovens ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The big question is, how soon can we turn this into some sort of weapon?The device does look like an oven...You know who else loved ovens?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247938</id>
	<title>Re:sweet</title>
	<author>DarrenBaker</author>
	<datestamp>1259353380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want plasma bog roll.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want plasma bog roll .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want plasma bog roll.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30251136</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>rcamans</author>
	<datestamp>1259328360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For a moment there, I thought you were speaking lightly of Leeloo. Then I realized even if you were a geek living in your mother's basement, that would not be possible. Then I thought, if he were gay, maybe he is jealous...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For a moment there , I thought you were speaking lightly of Leeloo .
Then I realized even if you were a geek living in your mother 's basement , that would not be possible .
Then I thought , if he were gay , maybe he is jealous.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a moment there, I thought you were speaking lightly of Leeloo.
Then I realized even if you were a geek living in your mother's basement, that would not be possible.
Then I thought, if he were gay, maybe he is jealous...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248718</id>
	<title>Re:Is harmless to skin?</title>
	<author>yuhong</author>
	<datestamp>1259315460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If it kills bacteria in 12 seconds, it's "not nice stuff".</p></div><p>Another example from <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2007/02/08/finally-something-good-you-can-do-with-your-microwave.aspx" title="mercola.com" rel="nofollow">http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2007/02/08/finally-something-good-you-can-do-with-your-microwave.aspx</a> [mercola.com] :
"Interestingly, the microwave was even able to kill B. cereus spores, which are able to survive extreme heat and radiation (though it took four minutes, not two). It's no wonder, then, why heating food in a microwave changes the physical structure of foods, with virtually unknown consequences. "</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it kills bacteria in 12 seconds , it 's " not nice stuff " .Another example from http : //articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2007/02/08/finally-something-good-you-can-do-with-your-microwave.aspx [ mercola.com ] : " Interestingly , the microwave was even able to kill B. cereus spores , which are able to survive extreme heat and radiation ( though it took four minutes , not two ) .
It 's no wonder , then , why heating food in a microwave changes the physical structure of foods , with virtually unknown consequences .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it kills bacteria in 12 seconds, it's "not nice stuff".Another example from http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2007/02/08/finally-something-good-you-can-do-with-your-microwave.aspx [mercola.com] :
"Interestingly, the microwave was even able to kill B. cereus spores, which are able to survive extreme heat and radiation (though it took four minutes, not two).
It's no wonder, then, why heating food in a microwave changes the physical structure of foods, with virtually unknown consequences.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247858</id>
	<title>biological parallel to "with a big enough hammer"</title>
	<author>SuperBanana</author>
	<datestamp>1259353020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>This eradicates the germs, they aren't being poisoned or having their chemical processes blocked (which is what most antibiotics do), it's ripping the germs apart at the atomic level. You don't develop a resistance to that.</i>

</p><p>I'm sure similar thoughts were said about radiation, bleach, alcohol, and autoclaves.  Turns out there are various critters resistant or immune to each.

</p><p>However, if this manages to blow away prions (which aren't zapped by a number of things, including normal autoclaves), it'll be great news.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This eradicates the germs , they are n't being poisoned or having their chemical processes blocked ( which is what most antibiotics do ) , it 's ripping the germs apart at the atomic level .
You do n't develop a resistance to that .
I 'm sure similar thoughts were said about radiation , bleach , alcohol , and autoclaves .
Turns out there are various critters resistant or immune to each .
However , if this manages to blow away prions ( which are n't zapped by a number of things , including normal autoclaves ) , it 'll be great news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> This eradicates the germs, they aren't being poisoned or having their chemical processes blocked (which is what most antibiotics do), it's ripping the germs apart at the atomic level.
You don't develop a resistance to that.
I'm sure similar thoughts were said about radiation, bleach, alcohol, and autoclaves.
Turns out there are various critters resistant or immune to each.
However, if this manages to blow away prions (which aren't zapped by a number of things, including normal autoclaves), it'll be great news.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248230</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>nacturation</author>
	<datestamp>1259355480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And four compass directions: North, South, East, and West.  The bible mentions the four corners of the (flat, square) Earth too.  All these references to four!  Before you know it, your post will get modded to Score: 4, Interesting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And four compass directions : North , South , East , and West .
The bible mentions the four corners of the ( flat , square ) Earth too .
All these references to four !
Before you know it , your post will get modded to Score : 4 , Interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And four compass directions: North, South, East, and West.
The bible mentions the four corners of the (flat, square) Earth too.
All these references to four!
Before you know it, your post will get modded to Score: 4, Interesting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248020</id>
	<title>Sonic Showers anyone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259353860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh yes, I went there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yes , I went there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yes, I went there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247880</id>
	<title>Re:Of course...</title>
	<author>spidercoz</author>
	<datestamp>1259353140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and the winner for "Most Subtle Godwining of the Week" goes to...</htmltext>
<tokenext>and the winner for " Most Subtle Godwining of the Week " goes to.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and the winner for "Most Subtle Godwining of the Week" goes to...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248880</id>
	<title>Re:Of course...</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1259316180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Depends on how fast we can get our hands at some Elerium-115.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends on how fast we can get our hands at some Elerium-115 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends on how fast we can get our hands at some Elerium-115.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247834</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>BarryJacobsen</author>
	<datestamp>1259352900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That's just coincidental. Besides there were FIVE elements; Fire, water, earth, air and orange haired Ukrainian chick.</p></div><p>Everyone knows that the fifth element is Heart and is represented by a South American with a monkey.

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captain\_Planet\_and\_the\_Planeteers#Planeteers" title="wikipedia.org">Source</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's just coincidental .
Besides there were FIVE elements ; Fire , water , earth , air and orange haired Ukrainian chick.Everyone knows that the fifth element is Heart and is represented by a South American with a monkey .
Source [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's just coincidental.
Besides there were FIVE elements; Fire, water, earth, air and orange haired Ukrainian chick.Everyone knows that the fifth element is Heart and is represented by a South American with a monkey.
Source [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249142</id>
	<title>FINALLY</title>
	<author>Xelios</author>
	<datestamp>1259317500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Finally</i> we'll all get to figure out how to use the three seashells!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally we 'll all get to figure out how to use the three seashells !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally we'll all get to figure out how to use the three seashells!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30254412</id>
	<title>Re:Resistance?</title>
	<author>Fear the Clam</author>
	<datestamp>1259422380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>So how long until we see bacteria resistant to this device?</i></p><p>How long does it take for SyFy to make one of their movies?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So how long until we see bacteria resistant to this device ? How long does it take for SyFy to make one of their movies ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how long until we see bacteria resistant to this device?How long does it take for SyFy to make one of their movies?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247774</id>
	<title>Is harmless to skin?</title>
	<author>Dunbal</author>
	<datestamp>1259352480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So was phenol, for that matter. If it kills bacteria in 12 seconds, it's "not nice stuff". Oh yeah maybe the keratin on your skin will prevent it from penetrating. What if it gets in your sweat glands. What if your skin has a lesion, and the keratin is interrupted...</p><p>This one gets filed in the "call me when we've been using it safely for 20 years" category. Until then I will stick to soap and water.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So was phenol , for that matter .
If it kills bacteria in 12 seconds , it 's " not nice stuff " .
Oh yeah maybe the keratin on your skin will prevent it from penetrating .
What if it gets in your sweat glands .
What if your skin has a lesion , and the keratin is interrupted...This one gets filed in the " call me when we 've been using it safely for 20 years " category .
Until then I will stick to soap and water .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So was phenol, for that matter.
If it kills bacteria in 12 seconds, it's "not nice stuff".
Oh yeah maybe the keratin on your skin will prevent it from penetrating.
What if it gets in your sweat glands.
What if your skin has a lesion, and the keratin is interrupted...This one gets filed in the "call me when we've been using it safely for 20 years" category.
Until then I will stick to soap and water.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247924</id>
	<title>Re:Good bacteria?</title>
	<author>RJFerret</author>
	<datestamp>1259353320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More importantly, how to replenish your good bacteria?</p><p>The same problem exists with antibacterial soap, after using it and making yourself more vulnerable to harmful bacteria, how do you replace the good defensive bacteria you had in the first place that keeps you healthy?  (Since you've just created an environment ripe for harmful bacteria to flourish.)</p><p>Obviously this new process also affects viruses and fungi, although it makes no mention of any impact to fungal spores in TFA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More importantly , how to replenish your good bacteria ? The same problem exists with antibacterial soap , after using it and making yourself more vulnerable to harmful bacteria , how do you replace the good defensive bacteria you had in the first place that keeps you healthy ?
( Since you 've just created an environment ripe for harmful bacteria to flourish .
) Obviously this new process also affects viruses and fungi , although it makes no mention of any impact to fungal spores in TFA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More importantly, how to replenish your good bacteria?The same problem exists with antibacterial soap, after using it and making yourself more vulnerable to harmful bacteria, how do you replace the good defensive bacteria you had in the first place that keeps you healthy?
(Since you've just created an environment ripe for harmful bacteria to flourish.
)Obviously this new process also affects viruses and fungi, although it makes no mention of any impact to fungal spores in TFA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249872</id>
	<title>I hear copper works too.</title>
	<author>zullnero</author>
	<datestamp>1259321220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just saying.  Hospitals use it for door handles and other surfaces because it can zap superbugs.

But hey, it's way cooler to pass your hands into some sort of holding tank where they can be spritzed with some sort of crazy atmospheric plasma.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just saying .
Hospitals use it for door handles and other surfaces because it can zap superbugs .
But hey , it 's way cooler to pass your hands into some sort of holding tank where they can be spritzed with some sort of crazy atmospheric plasma .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just saying.
Hospitals use it for door handles and other surfaces because it can zap superbugs.
But hey, it's way cooler to pass your hands into some sort of holding tank where they can be spritzed with some sort of crazy atmospheric plasma.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30250190</id>
	<title>Re:sweet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259322900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I swear I'd never use your plasma toothbrush to trim my ass hairs or clean up the dingleberries. And I totally don't use your regular razor and toothbrush to do that now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I swear I 'd never use your plasma toothbrush to trim my ass hairs or clean up the dingleberries .
And I totally do n't use your regular razor and toothbrush to do that now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I swear I'd never use your plasma toothbrush to trim my ass hairs or clean up the dingleberries.
And I totally don't use your regular razor and toothbrush to do that now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488</id>
	<title>Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259350860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But I find it interesting that according to ancient alchemy there were four "elements" (fire, water, earth, and air), and according to modern science there are four "states of matter" (plasma, liquid, solid, and gaseous).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But I find it interesting that according to ancient alchemy there were four " elements " ( fire , water , earth , and air ) , and according to modern science there are four " states of matter " ( plasma , liquid , solid , and gaseous ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I find it interesting that according to ancient alchemy there were four "elements" (fire, water, earth, and air), and according to modern science there are four "states of matter" (plasma, liquid, solid, and gaseous).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508</id>
	<title>Resistance?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259350980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So how long until we see bacteria resistant to this device?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So how long until we see bacteria resistant to this device ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how long until we see bacteria resistant to this device?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248006</id>
	<title>Old news!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259353800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Enterprise crew were removing bacteria, skin, and everything else in seconds with plasma (phasers) in 1966!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Enterprise crew were removing bacteria , skin , and everything else in seconds with plasma ( phasers ) in 1966 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Enterprise crew were removing bacteria, skin, and everything else in seconds with plasma (phasers) in 1966!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30253680</id>
	<title>Re:Good bacteria?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259410320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I thought a lot of the bacteria in and on humans were good ones, which are required to be fit and healthy and function properly. What happens to those?</p></div><p>As long as you aren't ramming your plasma blaster up your ass, you'll be fine.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought a lot of the bacteria in and on humans were good ones , which are required to be fit and healthy and function properly .
What happens to those ? As long as you are n't ramming your plasma blaster up your ass , you 'll be fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought a lot of the bacteria in and on humans were good ones, which are required to be fit and healthy and function properly.
What happens to those?As long as you aren't ramming your plasma blaster up your ass, you'll be fine.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248318</id>
	<title>Re:Is harmless to skin?</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1259312940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a matter of the amounts. Phenol can get past your skin and in to general circulation quite easily. There's a lot more phenol molecules in a liquid cleaner than there will be free radicals in the plasma. The free radicals will also neutralize themselves quickly as they contact proteins.</p><p>Soap and water are just fine though so unless you're a doctor or nurse you will probably want to stay with those anyway for simple practicality.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a matter of the amounts .
Phenol can get past your skin and in to general circulation quite easily .
There 's a lot more phenol molecules in a liquid cleaner than there will be free radicals in the plasma .
The free radicals will also neutralize themselves quickly as they contact proteins.Soap and water are just fine though so unless you 're a doctor or nurse you will probably want to stay with those anyway for simple practicality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a matter of the amounts.
Phenol can get past your skin and in to general circulation quite easily.
There's a lot more phenol molecules in a liquid cleaner than there will be free radicals in the plasma.
The free radicals will also neutralize themselves quickly as they contact proteins.Soap and water are just fine though so unless you're a doctor or nurse you will probably want to stay with those anyway for simple practicality.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30254448</id>
	<title>Showers</title>
	<author>Phoghat</author>
	<datestamp>1259422920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Before she went to the party on the space station, Danielle stepped into the sanitizer and turned it on. Since there was no water involved their was no need for an enclosure and the sleek lines of her body...
<p>to be continued</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Before she went to the party on the space station , Danielle stepped into the sanitizer and turned it on .
Since there was no water involved their was no need for an enclosure and the sleek lines of her body.. . to be continued</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Before she went to the party on the space station, Danielle stepped into the sanitizer and turned it on.
Since there was no water involved their was no need for an enclosure and the sleek lines of her body...
to be continued</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249072</id>
	<title>Re:Excessive cleanliness</title>
	<author>b4upoo</author>
	<datestamp>1259317080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>         Could this device be used to kill off bacteria in blood without ruining the blood? If so it could be used in a device somewhat like a unit used for kidney patients to save people with runaway internal infections.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could this device be used to kill off bacteria in blood without ruining the blood ?
If so it could be used in a device somewhat like a unit used for kidney patients to save people with runaway internal infections .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>         Could this device be used to kill off bacteria in blood without ruining the blood?
If so it could be used in a device somewhat like a unit used for kidney patients to save people with runaway internal infections.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248108</id>
	<title>Plama device</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259354520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> BBC reports that researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics have demonstrated a plasma device that can rid hands, feet, or even underarms of bacteria, including the hospital superbug MRSA</p> </div><p> <b>Don't taz me Bro!!!</b></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>BBC reports that researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics have demonstrated a plasma device that can rid hands , feet , or even underarms of bacteria , including the hospital superbug MRSA Do n't taz me Bro ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext> BBC reports that researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics have demonstrated a plasma device that can rid hands, feet, or even underarms of bacteria, including the hospital superbug MRSA  Don't taz me Bro!!
!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248622</id>
	<title>Re:Excessive cleanliness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259314680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that refered to the bacteria on your skin that support a healthy immune system in the same way a very very minor level of radiation (re: sunlight) does. Zero bacteria and radiation may be called healthy, but in a world where such things exist, an individual with no exposure would be at extreme risk to them. Hence the minimum threshold exposure caused by the bacteria on skin and sunlight radiation making you "healthier" by being able to deal with basic germs and backgorund radiation that a "sheltered" person would have more difficulty with.</p><p>this on the other hand is not talking about that. this about sterilization, primarily for hospitals (staph on the skin: good. staph inside the body after a surgical proceedure: VERY BAD). but also potentially useful in other "sterilized" locations: namely food processing plants. you realize how much time and effort goes to cleaning these places every night in preparation for the next day? and as successful as they are, stuff still occasional gets through, finding that one lil crack in the machine the soap misses, etc. This tech would both be TREMENDOUSLY more effective (1 in 10000 washes missing somehting to less than 1 in 10mil), it could also be far faster.</p><p>And companies would nut themselves over the faster, probably regardless of the initial investment for the egar. not only the reduced labor requirements, but the fact the plant wouldnt have to be shutdown (ie: inactive) for nearly as long. Plants are basically occupied 24/7, but hte problem is at night, that occupation is the cleaning shift. Even reducing cleaning time by only 33\% would cause a profitable increase in available production time. And results would likely be better than that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that refered to the bacteria on your skin that support a healthy immune system in the same way a very very minor level of radiation ( re : sunlight ) does .
Zero bacteria and radiation may be called healthy , but in a world where such things exist , an individual with no exposure would be at extreme risk to them .
Hence the minimum threshold exposure caused by the bacteria on skin and sunlight radiation making you " healthier " by being able to deal with basic germs and backgorund radiation that a " sheltered " person would have more difficulty with.this on the other hand is not talking about that .
this about sterilization , primarily for hospitals ( staph on the skin : good .
staph inside the body after a surgical proceedure : VERY BAD ) .
but also potentially useful in other " sterilized " locations : namely food processing plants .
you realize how much time and effort goes to cleaning these places every night in preparation for the next day ?
and as successful as they are , stuff still occasional gets through , finding that one lil crack in the machine the soap misses , etc .
This tech would both be TREMENDOUSLY more effective ( 1 in 10000 washes missing somehting to less than 1 in 10mil ) , it could also be far faster.And companies would nut themselves over the faster , probably regardless of the initial investment for the egar .
not only the reduced labor requirements , but the fact the plant wouldnt have to be shutdown ( ie : inactive ) for nearly as long .
Plants are basically occupied 24/7 , but hte problem is at night , that occupation is the cleaning shift .
Even reducing cleaning time by only 33 \ % would cause a profitable increase in available production time .
And results would likely be better than that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that refered to the bacteria on your skin that support a healthy immune system in the same way a very very minor level of radiation (re: sunlight) does.
Zero bacteria and radiation may be called healthy, but in a world where such things exist, an individual with no exposure would be at extreme risk to them.
Hence the minimum threshold exposure caused by the bacteria on skin and sunlight radiation making you "healthier" by being able to deal with basic germs and backgorund radiation that a "sheltered" person would have more difficulty with.this on the other hand is not talking about that.
this about sterilization, primarily for hospitals (staph on the skin: good.
staph inside the body after a surgical proceedure: VERY BAD).
but also potentially useful in other "sterilized" locations: namely food processing plants.
you realize how much time and effort goes to cleaning these places every night in preparation for the next day?
and as successful as they are, stuff still occasional gets through, finding that one lil crack in the machine the soap misses, etc.
This tech would both be TREMENDOUSLY more effective (1 in 10000 washes missing somehting to less than 1 in 10mil), it could also be far faster.And companies would nut themselves over the faster, probably regardless of the initial investment for the egar.
not only the reduced labor requirements, but the fact the plant wouldnt have to be shutdown (ie: inactive) for nearly as long.
Plants are basically occupied 24/7, but hte problem is at night, that occupation is the cleaning shift.
Even reducing cleaning time by only 33\% would cause a profitable increase in available production time.
And results would likely be better than that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249258</id>
	<title>Re:Excessive cleanliness</title>
	<author>hydromike2</author>
	<datestamp>1259318160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>exactly, thats why<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ers will never die of viral/bacterial diseases, just heart attacks and strokes</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>exactly , thats why /.ers will never die of viral/bacterial diseases , just heart attacks and strokes</tokentext>
<sentencetext>exactly, thats why /.ers will never die of viral/bacterial diseases, just heart attacks and strokes</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30250124</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259322540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A)  Linka was WIND (Mati was the 5th element, Heart)<br>B)  We have Bose-Einstein condensate, too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A ) Linka was WIND ( Mati was the 5th element , Heart ) B ) We have Bose-Einstein condensate , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A)  Linka was WIND (Mati was the 5th element, Heart)B)  We have Bose-Einstein condensate, too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30253374</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>Blain</author>
	<datestamp>1259403900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>Element 5 was also know as the quintessence.&nbsp; FWIW.</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>Element 5 was also know as the quintessence.   FWIW .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Element 5 was also know as the quintessence.  FWIW.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506</id>
	<title>Excessive cleanliness</title>
	<author>the\_one(2)</author>
	<datestamp>1259350980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you remember the article on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. about how excessive cleanliness isn't all that good for you? Yeah...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you remember the article on / .
about how excessive cleanliness is n't all that good for you ?
Yeah.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you remember the article on /.
about how excessive cleanliness isn't all that good for you?
Yeah...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247958</id>
	<title>Re:Kick-ass for hospitals</title>
	<author>rev\_sanchez</author>
	<datestamp>1259353500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd like to think that before I die the idea of shooting one's self in the ass and/or groin with plasma after using the restroom is not only common but encouraged in the interest of cleanliness and good manners.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to think that before I die the idea of shooting one 's self in the ass and/or groin with plasma after using the restroom is not only common but encouraged in the interest of cleanliness and good manners .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to think that before I die the idea of shooting one's self in the ass and/or groin with plasma after using the restroom is not only common but encouraged in the interest of cleanliness and good manners.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30252082</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>aspelling</author>
	<datestamp>1259337900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Man, "orange haired Ukrainian chick" is a fiery element<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-) Inbed indeed</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , " orange haired Ukrainian chick " is a fiery element ; - ) Inbed indeed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, "orange haired Ukrainian chick" is a fiery element ;-) Inbed indeed</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248470</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>Rorschach1</author>
	<datestamp>1259313960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only in Western tradition.  In China, there were five - Fire, Earth, Water, Metal, and Wood.  They're also associated with points of the compass, which in theory ought to make it easier to navigate the gigantic Elements mall in Hong Kong, but in my experience you just wind up wandering in circles, wondering how the hell you wound up back in the 'Metal' section yet again when all you want is a coffee at Starbucks.</p><p>Apparently 'you are here' marks on maps are not a part of Eastern tradition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only in Western tradition .
In China , there were five - Fire , Earth , Water , Metal , and Wood .
They 're also associated with points of the compass , which in theory ought to make it easier to navigate the gigantic Elements mall in Hong Kong , but in my experience you just wind up wandering in circles , wondering how the hell you wound up back in the 'Metal ' section yet again when all you want is a coffee at Starbucks.Apparently 'you are here ' marks on maps are not a part of Eastern tradition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only in Western tradition.
In China, there were five - Fire, Earth, Water, Metal, and Wood.
They're also associated with points of the compass, which in theory ought to make it easier to navigate the gigantic Elements mall in Hong Kong, but in my experience you just wind up wandering in circles, wondering how the hell you wound up back in the 'Metal' section yet again when all you want is a coffee at Starbucks.Apparently 'you are here' marks on maps are not a part of Eastern tradition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30257110</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>Lana.m</author>
	<datestamp>1259407920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Instead of killing we could just do $sudo -u bacteria view<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/var/log/syslog<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)

And the chick was not Ukrainian, Milla is Serbian<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of killing we could just do $ sudo -u bacteria view /var/log/syslog ; ) And the chick was not Ukrainian , Milla is Serbian ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of killing we could just do $sudo -u bacteria view /var/log/syslog ;)

And the chick was not Ukrainian, Milla is Serbian ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249428</id>
	<title>Psoriasis</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1259319060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about testing it on ppl with Psoriasis? This is suppose to be a genetic disease in the same fashion that all of the duodenal ulcers were called that we suddenly soaring in count. Oddly, all of the drug companies claimed it was genetic and came up with all sorts of drugs to solve the symptoms, but not the problem.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about testing it on ppl with Psoriasis ?
This is suppose to be a genetic disease in the same fashion that all of the duodenal ulcers were called that we suddenly soaring in count .
Oddly , all of the drug companies claimed it was genetic and came up with all sorts of drugs to solve the symptoms , but not the problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about testing it on ppl with Psoriasis?
This is suppose to be a genetic disease in the same fashion that all of the duodenal ulcers were called that we suddenly soaring in count.
Oddly, all of the drug companies claimed it was genetic and came up with all sorts of drugs to solve the symptoms, but not the problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247714</id>
	<title>Re:Good bacteria?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259352060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RTFS, this isn't something you're using to wash your hands off after you take a shit. It wouldn't even help with that anyway, as afaik you'd still have shit on your hands, just, the bacteria would be dead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RTFS , this is n't something you 're using to wash your hands off after you take a shit .
It would n't even help with that anyway , as afaik you 'd still have shit on your hands , just , the bacteria would be dead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RTFS, this isn't something you're using to wash your hands off after you take a shit.
It wouldn't even help with that anyway, as afaik you'd still have shit on your hands, just, the bacteria would be dead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248204</id>
	<title>Re:sweet</title>
	<author>bdabautcb</author>
	<datestamp>1259355180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I want a plasma hoverboard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want a plasma hoverboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want a plasma hoverboard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247854</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259353020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Traditionally there are only 3 states of matter.  If you want to get more contemporary, there are actually 5 states of matter (plasma, gas, liquid, solid, bose-einstein condensate). If you want to get more technical there are a number of others (superfluids, degenerate, etc) that we could consider as well.</p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State\_of\_matter</p><p>FYI.  Sometimes a coincidence is just a coincidence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Traditionally there are only 3 states of matter .
If you want to get more contemporary , there are actually 5 states of matter ( plasma , gas , liquid , solid , bose-einstein condensate ) .
If you want to get more technical there are a number of others ( superfluids , degenerate , etc ) that we could consider as well.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State \ _of \ _matterFYI .
Sometimes a coincidence is just a coincidence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Traditionally there are only 3 states of matter.
If you want to get more contemporary, there are actually 5 states of matter (plasma, gas, liquid, solid, bose-einstein condensate).
If you want to get more technical there are a number of others (superfluids, degenerate, etc) that we could consider as well.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State\_of\_matterFYI.
Sometimes a coincidence is just a coincidence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248018</id>
	<title>On-Topic:  Who is Gregor Morfill?</title>
	<author>reporter</author>
	<datestamp>1259353860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The person who lead the research in using plasma to disinfect the human body is Gregor Morfill.  Who is Gregor Morfill?
<p>
The Max Planck Institute has <a href="http://www.mpg.de/cgi-bin/mpg.de/person.cgi?nav=kontakt&amp;persId=152863&amp;lang=en&amp;inst=extraterrestrische\_physik" title="www.mpg.de" rel="nofollow">a Web page</a> [www.mpg.de] that tells us who he is.  Below is a quote from his resume.
</p><p>
"<b>Born on July 23, 1945 in Oberhausen. Study of physics, doctorate Imperial College of Science and Technology (1971), German Habilitation in physics Heidelberg Univ. (1977), Director and Scientific Member at the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (since 1984).</b>"
</p><p>
Below is a list of his awards.
</p><p>
<b>
Patten Prize of Indiana University
<br>
Science Award of the Donors' Association for the Promotion of Sciences and Humanites in Germany
<br>
Honorary Professor Univ. of Arizona, Tucson
<br>
Honorary Doctor Technical Univ. Berlin
<br>
Honorary Professor Univ. of Leeds, England
<br>
Foreign Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences
</b> </p><p>
Dr. Morfill must be a brilliant scholar as the Russian Academy of Sciences rarely grants membership to scientists who are not Russian citizens.
</p><p>
Here is an interesting question.  Why have Germans (like Dr. Morfill) accomplished so much in science and technology?  Does culture, genetics, or a combination (of both) explain their scientific prowess?  Note that Albert Einstein is a German (with a Jewish heritage).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The person who lead the research in using plasma to disinfect the human body is Gregor Morfill .
Who is Gregor Morfill ?
The Max Planck Institute has a Web page [ www.mpg.de ] that tells us who he is .
Below is a quote from his resume .
" Born on July 23 , 1945 in Oberhausen .
Study of physics , doctorate Imperial College of Science and Technology ( 1971 ) , German Habilitation in physics Heidelberg Univ .
( 1977 ) , Director and Scientific Member at the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics ( since 1984 ) .
" Below is a list of his awards .
Patten Prize of Indiana University Science Award of the Donors ' Association for the Promotion of Sciences and Humanites in Germany Honorary Professor Univ .
of Arizona , Tucson Honorary Doctor Technical Univ .
Berlin Honorary Professor Univ .
of Leeds , England Foreign Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences Dr. Morfill must be a brilliant scholar as the Russian Academy of Sciences rarely grants membership to scientists who are not Russian citizens .
Here is an interesting question .
Why have Germans ( like Dr. Morfill ) accomplished so much in science and technology ?
Does culture , genetics , or a combination ( of both ) explain their scientific prowess ?
Note that Albert Einstein is a German ( with a Jewish heritage ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The person who lead the research in using plasma to disinfect the human body is Gregor Morfill.
Who is Gregor Morfill?
The Max Planck Institute has a Web page [www.mpg.de] that tells us who he is.
Below is a quote from his resume.
"Born on July 23, 1945 in Oberhausen.
Study of physics, doctorate Imperial College of Science and Technology (1971), German Habilitation in physics Heidelberg Univ.
(1977), Director and Scientific Member at the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (since 1984).
"

Below is a list of his awards.
Patten Prize of Indiana University

Science Award of the Donors' Association for the Promotion of Sciences and Humanites in Germany

Honorary Professor Univ.
of Arizona, Tucson

Honorary Doctor Technical Univ.
Berlin

Honorary Professor Univ.
of Leeds, England

Foreign Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences
 
Dr. Morfill must be a brilliant scholar as the Russian Academy of Sciences rarely grants membership to scientists who are not Russian citizens.
Here is an interesting question.
Why have Germans (like Dr. Morfill) accomplished so much in science and technology?
Does culture, genetics, or a combination (of both) explain their scientific prowess?
Note that Albert Einstein is a German (with a Jewish heritage).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247780</id>
	<title>What?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1259352480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Plasma Device Kills<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Skin In Seconds</p> </div><p>Sorry, but I always read it as this. And TFS is just a big bunch of white noise after this...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Plasma Device Kills ... Skin In Seconds Sorry , but I always read it as this .
And TFS is just a big bunch of white noise after this.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Plasma Device Kills ... Skin In Seconds Sorry, but I always read it as this.
And TFS is just a big bunch of white noise after this...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248116</id>
	<title>Re:Excessive cleanliness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259354520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was told that ultrapure water that is de-mineralied, de-ionized, etc is not good for humans.<br>They were telling me that the purified water was being used to cool down elctronics since it<br>provided a low ohmic resistance which improved the heat condution of the water. However,they had<br>a person tap into the pipe that circulated the water and feed it to an automatic coffee machine.<br>When they found out about it, they asked if anyone in the room was haviing the shits. One person<br>said they were affected. Thus, they knew who tapped the pipe. They then told them that purified<br>or ultra-purified water is not good for humans since it makes you sick.</p><p>I wonder if the same situation occurs for anyone trying to use purfied water or heavy water from<br>atomic reactors? Would that water also affect humans regardless if it was or was not sent through<br>the reactor and absorbed some radiation, but not mixed with radioactive substances?<br>If so, then if humans go to the outer galaxies, find water and not knowing what organisms exist<br>in the water, they radiate it or ultra purify it and in the end get sick because it is to pure.<br>Thus, one would have to carry minerals or gator aid to make it drinkable by humans. Moreover,<br>instead of dragging along minerals from earth, that one only takes the good bacteria along which<br>can reproduce and generate the minerals humans need as by-products which are then added to the<br>water to allow humans to drink it. The other possibility is we drink the pure water and then<br>swallow a liquid/solid pill that contains the minerals we need from the bacteria mineral machine<br>and let our stomachs mix the two together. The third possiblity, is to genetically modify the<br>bood bacteria to produce the minerals we need, and then we swallow them before takeoff.<br>They would live in the humans stomachs so that when one drinks pure water, the bacteria is already<br>reproducing inside of us to create the minerals to be mixed with the pure water. Thus, no bacteria<br>mineral machine is needed to be carried to outer space - it is inside of us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was told that ultrapure water that is de-mineralied , de-ionized , etc is not good for humans.They were telling me that the purified water was being used to cool down elctronics since itprovided a low ohmic resistance which improved the heat condution of the water .
However,they hada person tap into the pipe that circulated the water and feed it to an automatic coffee machine.When they found out about it , they asked if anyone in the room was haviing the shits .
One personsaid they were affected .
Thus , they knew who tapped the pipe .
They then told them that purifiedor ultra-purified water is not good for humans since it makes you sick.I wonder if the same situation occurs for anyone trying to use purfied water or heavy water fromatomic reactors ?
Would that water also affect humans regardless if it was or was not sent throughthe reactor and absorbed some radiation , but not mixed with radioactive substances ? If so , then if humans go to the outer galaxies , find water and not knowing what organisms existin the water , they radiate it or ultra purify it and in the end get sick because it is to pure.Thus , one would have to carry minerals or gator aid to make it drinkable by humans .
Moreover,instead of dragging along minerals from earth , that one only takes the good bacteria along whichcan reproduce and generate the minerals humans need as by-products which are then added to thewater to allow humans to drink it .
The other possibility is we drink the pure water and thenswallow a liquid/solid pill that contains the minerals we need from the bacteria mineral machineand let our stomachs mix the two together .
The third possiblity , is to genetically modify thebood bacteria to produce the minerals we need , and then we swallow them before takeoff.They would live in the humans stomachs so that when one drinks pure water , the bacteria is alreadyreproducing inside of us to create the minerals to be mixed with the pure water .
Thus , no bacteriamineral machine is needed to be carried to outer space - it is inside of us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was told that ultrapure water that is de-mineralied, de-ionized, etc is not good for humans.They were telling me that the purified water was being used to cool down elctronics since itprovided a low ohmic resistance which improved the heat condution of the water.
However,they hada person tap into the pipe that circulated the water and feed it to an automatic coffee machine.When they found out about it, they asked if anyone in the room was haviing the shits.
One personsaid they were affected.
Thus, they knew who tapped the pipe.
They then told them that purifiedor ultra-purified water is not good for humans since it makes you sick.I wonder if the same situation occurs for anyone trying to use purfied water or heavy water fromatomic reactors?
Would that water also affect humans regardless if it was or was not sent throughthe reactor and absorbed some radiation, but not mixed with radioactive substances?If so, then if humans go to the outer galaxies, find water and not knowing what organisms existin the water, they radiate it or ultra purify it and in the end get sick because it is to pure.Thus, one would have to carry minerals or gator aid to make it drinkable by humans.
Moreover,instead of dragging along minerals from earth, that one only takes the good bacteria along whichcan reproduce and generate the minerals humans need as by-products which are then added to thewater to allow humans to drink it.
The other possibility is we drink the pure water and thenswallow a liquid/solid pill that contains the minerals we need from the bacteria mineral machineand let our stomachs mix the two together.
The third possiblity, is to genetically modify thebood bacteria to produce the minerals we need, and then we swallow them before takeoff.They would live in the humans stomachs so that when one drinks pure water, the bacteria is alreadyreproducing inside of us to create the minerals to be mixed with the pure water.
Thus, no bacteriamineral machine is needed to be carried to outer space - it is inside of us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247794</id>
	<title>as a nurse, you should know better</title>
	<author>SuperBanana</author>
	<datestamp>1259352600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>As a nurse I would welcome this as I have to wash and disinfect my hands several times a day.</i>

</p><p>As a nurse, I'd hope you would remember the same lecture on hand-washing I got when I started working for a hospital.  Namely, that your nails are equally if not more important.  What does this do for dirt under nails?  Uh huh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a nurse I would welcome this as I have to wash and disinfect my hands several times a day .
As a nurse , I 'd hope you would remember the same lecture on hand-washing I got when I started working for a hospital .
Namely , that your nails are equally if not more important .
What does this do for dirt under nails ?
Uh huh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> As a nurse I would welcome this as I have to wash and disinfect my hands several times a day.
As a nurse, I'd hope you would remember the same lecture on hand-washing I got when I started working for a hospital.
Namely, that your nails are equally if not more important.
What does this do for dirt under nails?
Uh huh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249834</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>LordVader717</author>
	<datestamp>1259321040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Four? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_states\_of\_matter" title="wikipedia.org">I beg to differ</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Four ?
I beg to differ [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Four?
I beg to differ [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30250198</id>
	<title>Re:Excessive cleanliness</title>
	<author>Fotherington</author>
	<datestamp>1259322900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, the research was done on mice and cultured skin cells. Choice quotes from <a href="http://www.nhs.uk/news/2009/11November/Pages/Is-dirt-good-for-kids.aspx" title="www.nhs.uk" rel="nofollow">the NHS Choices article</a> [www.nhs.uk] which discusses and links to <a href="http://www.nature.com/nm/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nm.2062.html" title="nature.com" rel="nofollow">the actual research</a> [nature.com]:</p><ul>
<li>"While the newspaper suggests that the findings are directly relevant to children&rsquo;s health, this was not investigated by the researchers, though they did suggest their results may have some application in the management of inflammatory skin disorders."</li><li>"This laboratory study<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... investigated whether chemicals produced by the bacteria Staphylococcus epidermidis could inhibit skin inflammation."</li><li>"The researchers state that finding out how such bacteria exist on the skin without causing inflammatory responses could help them understand whether these bacteria have a role in immune responses in general"</li></ul><p>
So it looks like we can't really draw any conclusions based on this, though it sounds logical that exposure to all sorts of bacteria will keep your immune system focussed on the task in hand rather than (e.g.) psoriasis. As is so often the way, the Swedish are <a href="http://www.waterproofworld.co.uk/forestschools.htm" title="waterproofworld.co.uk" rel="nofollow">way ahead of us</a> [waterproofworld.co.uk]: "In a typical Danish Forest School, young children from 3 years are taken into the forest for 4 hours each day of the week."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the research was done on mice and cultured skin cells .
Choice quotes from the NHS Choices article [ www.nhs.uk ] which discusses and links to the actual research [ nature.com ] : " While the newspaper suggests that the findings are directly relevant to children    s health , this was not investigated by the researchers , though they did suggest their results may have some application in the management of inflammatory skin disorders .
" " This laboratory study ... investigated whether chemicals produced by the bacteria Staphylococcus epidermidis could inhibit skin inflammation .
" " The researchers state that finding out how such bacteria exist on the skin without causing inflammatory responses could help them understand whether these bacteria have a role in immune responses in general " So it looks like we ca n't really draw any conclusions based on this , though it sounds logical that exposure to all sorts of bacteria will keep your immune system focussed on the task in hand rather than ( e.g .
) psoriasis .
As is so often the way , the Swedish are way ahead of us [ waterproofworld.co.uk ] : " In a typical Danish Forest School , young children from 3 years are taken into the forest for 4 hours each day of the week .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the research was done on mice and cultured skin cells.
Choice quotes from the NHS Choices article [www.nhs.uk] which discusses and links to the actual research [nature.com]:
"While the newspaper suggests that the findings are directly relevant to children’s health, this was not investigated by the researchers, though they did suggest their results may have some application in the management of inflammatory skin disorders.
""This laboratory study ... investigated whether chemicals produced by the bacteria Staphylococcus epidermidis could inhibit skin inflammation.
""The researchers state that finding out how such bacteria exist on the skin without causing inflammatory responses could help them understand whether these bacteria have a role in immune responses in general"
So it looks like we can't really draw any conclusions based on this, though it sounds logical that exposure to all sorts of bacteria will keep your immune system focussed on the task in hand rather than (e.g.
) psoriasis.
As is so often the way, the Swedish are way ahead of us [waterproofworld.co.uk]: "In a typical Danish Forest School, young children from 3 years are taken into the forest for 4 hours each day of the week.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247626</id>
	<title>Surface only, though?</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1259351520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Washing hands is partly about physical scrubbing, which loosens things on the surface. How is this plasma going to replace that?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Washing hands is partly about physical scrubbing , which loosens things on the surface .
How is this plasma going to replace that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Washing hands is partly about physical scrubbing, which loosens things on the surface.
How is this plasma going to replace that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247560</id>
	<title>technology is great....</title>
	<author>Ingcuervo</author>
	<datestamp>1259351160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>some used to say that plasma TV were awesome, now wait for the plasma shower!!!!!

bravia of course will charge twice as everyother else.</htmltext>
<tokenext>some used to say that plasma TV were awesome , now wait for the plasma shower ! ! ! ! !
bravia of course will charge twice as everyother else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>some used to say that plasma TV were awesome, now wait for the plasma shower!!!!!
bravia of course will charge twice as everyother else.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247966</id>
	<title>Amorphous wanst the 4th state of matter ?</title>
	<author>ciganito</author>
	<datestamp>1259353560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am not sure, but I always thought as "amorphous" was the 4th state of the matter. Despite I don't have an academic/scientific paper on hand to solidify this, it's at least something to look at. Amorphous matherials, window glass (as an example) are not exactly solid... Anyways... worst than science only religion.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am not sure , but I always thought as " amorphous " was the 4th state of the matter .
Despite I do n't have an academic/scientific paper on hand to solidify this , it 's at least something to look at .
Amorphous matherials , window glass ( as an example ) are not exactly solid... Anyways... worst than science only religion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am not sure, but I always thought as "amorphous" was the 4th state of the matter.
Despite I don't have an academic/scientific paper on hand to solidify this, it's at least something to look at.
Amorphous matherials, window glass (as an example) are not exactly solid... Anyways... worst than science only religion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30253412</id>
	<title>rife plasma generator from the 1930's</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259405100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>check this out, <a href="http://www.rife.org/" title="rife.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.rife.org/</a> [rife.org] this man had been doing this long ago</htmltext>
<tokenext>check this out , http : //www.rife.org/ [ rife.org ] this man had been doing this long ago</tokentext>
<sentencetext>check this out, http://www.rife.org/ [rife.org] this man had been doing this long ago</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30251714</id>
	<title>Hmmmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259333280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>has anyone asked for a plasma screwdriver yet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>has anyone asked for a plasma screwdriver yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>has anyone asked for a plasma screwdriver yet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247596</id>
	<title>Re:Excessive cleanliness</title>
	<author>cashX3r0</author>
	<datestamp>1259351340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now the BBC reports that researchers<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... have demonstrated a plasma device that can rid hands, feet, or even underarms of bacteria<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... but is harmless to skin.</p></div><p>i dont mind a little extra cleansing if i can use this on my chode.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now the BBC reports that researchers ... have demonstrated a plasma device that can rid hands , feet , or even underarms of bacteria ... but is harmless to skin.i dont mind a little extra cleansing if i can use this on my chode .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now the BBC reports that researchers ... have demonstrated a plasma device that can rid hands, feet, or even underarms of bacteria ... but is harmless to skin.i dont mind a little extra cleansing if i can use this on my chode.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247722</id>
	<title>a true "wtf"</title>
	<author>cinnamon colbert</author>
	<datestamp>1259352120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this belongs on the science equivalent of www.thedailywtf.com<br>plasma = uncontrolled mix of highly reactive chemicals<br>highly reactive chemicals = damage to skin at some level<br>thus we have that old item, the therapeutic index  roughy ratio of harm to good<br>however,<br>highly reactive chemcials = bugs getting resistant<br>how ? learning to live deeper in the skin (bad for you)<br>learning to make enzymes that deto the highly reactive chemicals (radical quenchers like SOD)<br>learning to elaborte low molecular weight or high molecular weight (biofilm) molecules that sop up the highly reactive chemicals, so it takes a much higher conc of plasma</p><p>PS: MRSA is actually a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:"feeble" bug - we know this because there have been many, very carefull studies that compare patients with MRSA to patients with MSSA (methicillin sensitive S Aureus)<br>The finding is that petients who get MRSA infections are sicker then patients who get MSSA infections.<br>To my mind, this means that the genetic changes that make S aureus resistant also make the bug less healthy in general, so it has a difficult time getting established in th blood or in the joints or urinary tract.<br>And this is consistant with what is known (alot) about the gene mecA and how it acts.</p><p>also, there are new antibiotics approved in canada and switzerland that are active against mrsa - ceftobiprole</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this belongs on the science equivalent of www.thedailywtf.complasma = uncontrolled mix of highly reactive chemicalshighly reactive chemicals = damage to skin at some levelthus we have that old item , the therapeutic index roughy ratio of harm to goodhowever,highly reactive chemcials = bugs getting resistanthow ?
learning to live deeper in the skin ( bad for you ) learning to make enzymes that deto the highly reactive chemicals ( radical quenchers like SOD ) learning to elaborte low molecular weight or high molecular weight ( biofilm ) molecules that sop up the highly reactive chemicals , so it takes a much higher conc of plasmaPS : MRSA is actually a : " feeble " bug - we know this because there have been many , very carefull studies that compare patients with MRSA to patients with MSSA ( methicillin sensitive S Aureus ) The finding is that petients who get MRSA infections are sicker then patients who get MSSA infections.To my mind , this means that the genetic changes that make S aureus resistant also make the bug less healthy in general , so it has a difficult time getting established in th blood or in the joints or urinary tract.And this is consistant with what is known ( alot ) about the gene mecA and how it acts.also , there are new antibiotics approved in canada and switzerland that are active against mrsa - ceftobiprole</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this belongs on the science equivalent of www.thedailywtf.complasma = uncontrolled mix of highly reactive chemicalshighly reactive chemicals = damage to skin at some levelthus we have that old item, the therapeutic index  roughy ratio of harm to goodhowever,highly reactive chemcials = bugs getting resistanthow ?
learning to live deeper in the skin (bad for you)learning to make enzymes that deto the highly reactive chemicals (radical quenchers like SOD)learning to elaborte low molecular weight or high molecular weight (biofilm) molecules that sop up the highly reactive chemicals, so it takes a much higher conc of plasmaPS: MRSA is actually a :"feeble" bug - we know this because there have been many, very carefull studies that compare patients with MRSA to patients with MSSA (methicillin sensitive S Aureus)The finding is that petients who get MRSA infections are sicker then patients who get MSSA infections.To my mind, this means that the genetic changes that make S aureus resistant also make the bug less healthy in general, so it has a difficult time getting established in th blood or in the joints or urinary tract.And this is consistant with what is known (alot) about the gene mecA and how it acts.also, there are new antibiotics approved in canada and switzerland that are active against mrsa - ceftobiprole</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30251178</id>
	<title>Re:sweet</title>
	<author>rcamans</author>
	<datestamp>1259328540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait a minute. when was the last time you used any kind of bath tub?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait a minute .
when was the last time you used any kind of bath tub ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait a minute.
when was the last time you used any kind of bath tub?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247956</id>
	<title>Re:Resistance?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1259353500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder why nobody came up with the idea of selling proper bacterial cultures to apply to the skin after killing everything there. or to eat after antibiotics. That would be a gigantic business!!</p><p>Perhaps because it already exists, and is called yogurt (with living cultures), or a proper and fresh sour-dough starter culture (as opposed to the cultures/starters that have gone bad for years, but still are used by bakeries).<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>But hmm... if I just search around for really nice starter cultures, and let a microbiologist check them for the proper combination.<br>That could heal many diseases caused by the inability to get rid of bad cultures. (E.g. because every time you apply antibiotics, the bad ones get there first.)</p><p>Also: Why use such a high-tech device, wen you can just apply a iodine solution to your skin? Kills everything. bacterial, viruses, funguses, parasites. Of course you can never put it in your mouth or something, because it can just as well kill you (or at least make you very sick). But for the skin, what reasons are there not to use it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder why nobody came up with the idea of selling proper bacterial cultures to apply to the skin after killing everything there .
or to eat after antibiotics .
That would be a gigantic business !
! Perhaps because it already exists , and is called yogurt ( with living cultures ) , or a proper and fresh sour-dough starter culture ( as opposed to the cultures/starters that have gone bad for years , but still are used by bakeries ) .
: ) But hmm... if I just search around for really nice starter cultures , and let a microbiologist check them for the proper combination.That could heal many diseases caused by the inability to get rid of bad cultures .
( E.g. because every time you apply antibiotics , the bad ones get there first .
) Also : Why use such a high-tech device , wen you can just apply a iodine solution to your skin ?
Kills everything .
bacterial , viruses , funguses , parasites .
Of course you can never put it in your mouth or something , because it can just as well kill you ( or at least make you very sick ) .
But for the skin , what reasons are there not to use it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder why nobody came up with the idea of selling proper bacterial cultures to apply to the skin after killing everything there.
or to eat after antibiotics.
That would be a gigantic business!
!Perhaps because it already exists, and is called yogurt (with living cultures), or a proper and fresh sour-dough starter culture (as opposed to the cultures/starters that have gone bad for years, but still are used by bakeries).
:)But hmm... if I just search around for really nice starter cultures, and let a microbiologist check them for the proper combination.That could heal many diseases caused by the inability to get rid of bad cultures.
(E.g. because every time you apply antibiotics, the bad ones get there first.
)Also: Why use such a high-tech device, wen you can just apply a iodine solution to your skin?
Kills everything.
bacterial, viruses, funguses, parasites.
Of course you can never put it in your mouth or something, because it can just as well kill you (or at least make you very sick).
But for the skin, what reasons are there not to use it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248358</id>
	<title>Kill Virii?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259313120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>sounds similar to ultraviolet sterilization.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sounds similar to ultraviolet sterilization .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sounds similar to ultraviolet sterilization.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247654</id>
	<title>Of course...</title>
	<author>wcrowe</author>
	<datestamp>1259351700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The big question is, how soon can we turn this into some sort of weapon?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The big question is , how soon can we turn this into some sort of weapon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The big question is, how soon can we turn this into some sort of weapon?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30252754</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>lonecrow</author>
	<datestamp>1259347800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The four corners of the earth is better said as the four corners of the world and has nothing to do with a flat (square) earth.
<br> <br>
The reference is astronomical.
<a href="http://www.believeallthings.com/2810/corners-earth" title="believeallthings.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.believeallthings.com/2810/corners-earth</a> [believeallthings.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The four corners of the earth is better said as the four corners of the world and has nothing to do with a flat ( square ) earth .
The reference is astronomical .
http : //www.believeallthings.com/2810/corners-earth [ believeallthings.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The four corners of the earth is better said as the four corners of the world and has nothing to do with a flat (square) earth.
The reference is astronomical.
http://www.believeallthings.com/2810/corners-earth [believeallthings.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>sakdoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1259352180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's just coincidental. Besides there were FIVE elements; Fire, water, earth, air and orange haired Ukrainian chick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's just coincidental .
Besides there were FIVE elements ; Fire , water , earth , air and orange haired Ukrainian chick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's just coincidental.
Besides there were FIVE elements; Fire, water, earth, air and orange haired Ukrainian chick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247876</id>
	<title>Re:Kick-ass for hospitals</title>
	<author>Dunbal</author>
	<datestamp>1259353080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I doubt the hospital is going to spring for an x million dollar machine at every nurse's station just so that most nurses can pretend to use it, like most of them pretend to wash their hands nowadays. Don't throw out the soap just yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt the hospital is going to spring for an x million dollar machine at every nurse 's station just so that most nurses can pretend to use it , like most of them pretend to wash their hands nowadays .
Do n't throw out the soap just yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt the hospital is going to spring for an x million dollar machine at every nurse's station just so that most nurses can pretend to use it, like most of them pretend to wash their hands nowadays.
Don't throw out the soap just yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248002</id>
	<title>Re:Of course...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259353740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Holly Hobbie!</p><p>So, what did I win?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Holly Hobbie ! So , what did I win ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holly Hobbie!So, what did I win?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248348</id>
	<title>Re:Excessive cleanliness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259313060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suggest you read about "fecal therapy" in this news story:<br>http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2007/11/13/fecal-transplant.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suggest you read about " fecal therapy " in this news story : http : //www.cbc.ca/health/story/2007/11/13/fecal-transplant.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suggest you read about "fecal therapy" in this news story:http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2007/11/13/fecal-transplant.html</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247852</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>ironicsky</author>
	<datestamp>1259353020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Man, was she hot in that movie... *wont be standing up for at least 90 seconds*</htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , was she hot in that movie... * wont be standing up for at least 90 seconds *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, was she hot in that movie... *wont be standing up for at least 90 seconds*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30252000</id>
	<title>Abuse through Overuse?</title>
	<author>greenlead</author>
	<datestamp>1259337000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I read articles like this, I can't help but reflect on how radiation was the "in thing", and products featuring it were ubiquitous, and lots of people got sick and died. Centuries before, the same problem existed with mercury.

</p><p>I'm concerned about the possibility, however remote, that plasma-based technology is not truly harmless and could come back to bite us in the rear in a few years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I read articles like this , I ca n't help but reflect on how radiation was the " in thing " , and products featuring it were ubiquitous , and lots of people got sick and died .
Centuries before , the same problem existed with mercury .
I 'm concerned about the possibility , however remote , that plasma-based technology is not truly harmless and could come back to bite us in the rear in a few years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I read articles like this, I can't help but reflect on how radiation was the "in thing", and products featuring it were ubiquitous, and lots of people got sick and died.
Centuries before, the same problem existed with mercury.
I'm concerned about the possibility, however remote, that plasma-based technology is not truly harmless and could come back to bite us in the rear in a few years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248524</id>
	<title>Re:</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1259314200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ha!  That was a good one.  No, really.  You should write sitcoms for Fox.


Besides, this was 15 years ago, it was still just JPGs.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ha !
That was a good one .
No , really .
You should write sitcoms for Fox .
Besides , this was 15 years ago , it was still just JPGs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ha!
That was a good one.
No, really.
You should write sitcoms for Fox.
Besides, this was 15 years ago, it was still just JPGs.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249278</id>
	<title>Re:Excessive cleanliness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259318340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, in good news for you, a lot of doctors don't wash their hands very well anyhow.</p><p>Honestly, I get your point, but when a doctor is going to be putting his hands or surgical tools into my body, it would be nice if he made some attempt at cleaning them.  It is also proven that clean hands and clean tools tend to lead to less complications.  Now in your everyday life?  That's a different story.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , in good news for you , a lot of doctors do n't wash their hands very well anyhow.Honestly , I get your point , but when a doctor is going to be putting his hands or surgical tools into my body , it would be nice if he made some attempt at cleaning them .
It is also proven that clean hands and clean tools tend to lead to less complications .
Now in your everyday life ?
That 's a different story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, in good news for you, a lot of doctors don't wash their hands very well anyhow.Honestly, I get your point, but when a doctor is going to be putting his hands or surgical tools into my body, it would be nice if he made some attempt at cleaning them.
It is also proven that clean hands and clean tools tend to lead to less complications.
Now in your everyday life?
That's a different story.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248104</id>
	<title>Re:as a nurse, you should know better</title>
	<author>Aggrajag</author>
	<datestamp>1259354460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This would mean using less disinfectant, the alcohol dries my hands.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This would mean using less disinfectant , the alcohol dries my hands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would mean using less disinfectant, the alcohol dries my hands.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30270992</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>Taibhsear</author>
	<datestamp>1259602740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually there are more than four states of matter. Just from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State\_of\_matter" title="wikipedia.org">wiki page</a> [wikipedia.org] alone, I count 12 as well as 4 proposed new ones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually there are more than four states of matter .
Just from the wiki page [ wikipedia.org ] alone , I count 12 as well as 4 proposed new ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually there are more than four states of matter.
Just from the wiki page [wikipedia.org] alone, I count 12 as well as 4 proposed new ones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30265564</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>Kvasio</author>
	<datestamp>1259508060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jeff, is that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coupling\_(UK\_TV\_series)#Characters" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">you?</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jeff , is that you ?
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jeff, is that you?
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247580</id>
	<title>Good bacteria?</title>
	<author>Lord Lode</author>
	<datestamp>1259351220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought a lot of the bacteria in and on humans were good ones, which are required to be fit and healthy and function properly. What happens to those?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought a lot of the bacteria in and on humans were good ones , which are required to be fit and healthy and function properly .
What happens to those ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought a lot of the bacteria in and on humans were good ones, which are required to be fit and healthy and function properly.
What happens to those?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249268</id>
	<title>Re:Resistance?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259318220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In order to grow resistance, you have to leave a few alive and they have to have been left alive due in some part to something in their makeup causing them to be less vulnerable to the 'weapon'.</p></div><p>That sounds like evolution. In Kansas, the official position is that God creates more bacteria to show that science is a false idol.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In order to grow resistance , you have to leave a few alive and they have to have been left alive due in some part to something in their makeup causing them to be less vulnerable to the 'weapon'.That sounds like evolution .
In Kansas , the official position is that God creates more bacteria to show that science is a false idol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In order to grow resistance, you have to leave a few alive and they have to have been left alive due in some part to something in their makeup causing them to be less vulnerable to the 'weapon'.That sounds like evolution.
In Kansas, the official position is that God creates more bacteria to show that science is a false idol.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247978</id>
	<title>Re:Good bacteria?</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1259353620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Plasma knows neither good nor evil, it kills them all the same.  Further, these plasmas probably destroy a good deal of the oils in your skin as well.  Which probably means that if you sterilized your hands too much using non-equilibrium plasma you are more likely to have dry, rough skin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Plasma knows neither good nor evil , it kills them all the same .
Further , these plasmas probably destroy a good deal of the oils in your skin as well .
Which probably means that if you sterilized your hands too much using non-equilibrium plasma you are more likely to have dry , rough skin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Plasma knows neither good nor evil, it kills them all the same.
Further, these plasmas probably destroy a good deal of the oils in your skin as well.
Which probably means that if you sterilized your hands too much using non-equilibrium plasma you are more likely to have dry, rough skin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247526</id>
	<title>Alas...</title>
	<author>mim</author>
	<datestamp>1259351100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...bacteria, I knew thee well...</htmltext>
<tokenext>...bacteria , I knew thee well.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...bacteria, I knew thee well...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248258</id>
	<title>Re:Excessive cleanliness</title>
	<author>nacturation</author>
	<datestamp>1259312460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On a future operating room wall: <tt>To ensure your hands have been sterilized of all contaminents, please insert arms into this plasma conduit for 10 seconds before beginning any medical procedure.</tt></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On a future operating room wall : To ensure your hands have been sterilized of all contaminents , please insert arms into this plasma conduit for 10 seconds before beginning any medical procedure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On a future operating room wall: To ensure your hands have been sterilized of all contaminents, please insert arms into this plasma conduit for 10 seconds before beginning any medical procedure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248884</id>
	<title>Re:Resistance?</title>
	<author>tophermeyer</author>
	<datestamp>1259316240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not so sure that's true.  You would probably never see a human that is completely resistant to fire, but after a few generations I think you would certainly see humans with a greater ability to recuperate from burns.  Over time you would absolutely see humans with skin and physiology more resistance to heat damage.</p><p>It wouldn't happen quickly, but I think you would eventually see selection for some qualities that improve the organism's ability to survive fire. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not so sure that 's true .
You would probably never see a human that is completely resistant to fire , but after a few generations I think you would certainly see humans with a greater ability to recuperate from burns .
Over time you would absolutely see humans with skin and physiology more resistance to heat damage.It would n't happen quickly , but I think you would eventually see selection for some qualities that improve the organism 's ability to survive fire .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not so sure that's true.
You would probably never see a human that is completely resistant to fire, but after a few generations I think you would certainly see humans with a greater ability to recuperate from burns.
Over time you would absolutely see humans with skin and physiology more resistance to heat damage.It wouldn't happen quickly, but I think you would eventually see selection for some qualities that improve the organism's ability to survive fire. </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30270294</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>cmdr\_klarg</author>
	<datestamp>1259598660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Man, was she hot in that movie... *wont be standing up for at least 90 seconds*</p></div><p>I don't want one position, I want ALL positions!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , was she hot in that movie... * wont be standing up for at least 90 seconds * I do n't want one position , I want ALL positions !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, was she hot in that movie... *wont be standing up for at least 90 seconds*I don't want one position, I want ALL positions!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249448</id>
	<title>Re:Okay, I know this is off-topic...</title>
	<author>WoodenTable</author>
	<datestamp>1259319120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>All these references to four!  Before you know it, your post will get modded to Score: 4, Interesting.</p></div><p>Of course. Slashdot runs on an elemental system of four key elements, after all: Interesting, Insightful, Informative, and Funny! These four basic qualities are the very building blocks of truly great Slashdot comment sections.</p><p>The Four Slashdot Elements of Negativity will get no mention from me in this place, however.<nobr> <wbr></nobr><i>/spits</i></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All these references to four !
Before you know it , your post will get modded to Score : 4 , Interesting.Of course .
Slashdot runs on an elemental system of four key elements , after all : Interesting , Insightful , Informative , and Funny !
These four basic qualities are the very building blocks of truly great Slashdot comment sections.The Four Slashdot Elements of Negativity will get no mention from me in this place , however .
/spits</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All these references to four!
Before you know it, your post will get modded to Score: 4, Interesting.Of course.
Slashdot runs on an elemental system of four key elements, after all: Interesting, Insightful, Informative, and Funny!
These four basic qualities are the very building blocks of truly great Slashdot comment sections.The Four Slashdot Elements of Negativity will get no mention from me in this place, however.
/spits
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248230</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30254412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30252082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30250198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30257110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247864
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30251136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30270992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30254438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30251866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248204
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30265564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30253502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30253680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30250190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30270294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30251178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30250124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30252754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30251482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30253478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247928
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30278192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30250040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30253374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30269224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1646221_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1646221.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248608
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1646221.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247558
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248348
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248258
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247650
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30250198
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249072
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249258
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1646221.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248160
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248884
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30250040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247926
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30253502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247642
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248200
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247858
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247928
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30278192
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30251866
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249268
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30254412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30254438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30269224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1646221.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247794
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248104
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1646221.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248880
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247756
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248002
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247880
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1646221.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249134
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1646221.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248204
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247698
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30251482
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30250190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30251178
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1646221.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247544
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1646221.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247952
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30253374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30270992
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248230
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30252754
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30253478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247736
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248148
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30252082
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30250124
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247852
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30270294
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30265564
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247834
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30251136
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247888
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30257110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30249558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248860
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1646221.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30252000
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1646221.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248108
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1646221.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247526
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1646221.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247714
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30248012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30253680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1646221.30247978
</commentlist>
</conversation>
