<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_26_0316257</id>
	<title>CIA Manual Thought Lost In 1973 Available On Amazon</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1259240220000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"At the height of the Cold War, the Central Intelligence Agency paid renowned magician John Mulholland $3,000 to write <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/24/cia-manual-of-trickery-an\_n\_369645.html">a manual on misdirection, concealment, and stagecraft</a>. All known copies of the document were believed to be destroyed in 1973. Turns out one survived &mdash; and is now available on Amazon."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " At the height of the Cold War , the Central Intelligence Agency paid renowned magician John Mulholland $ 3,000 to write a manual on misdirection , concealment , and stagecraft .
All known copies of the document were believed to be destroyed in 1973 .
Turns out one survived    and is now available on Amazon .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "At the height of the Cold War, the Central Intelligence Agency paid renowned magician John Mulholland $3,000 to write a manual on misdirection, concealment, and stagecraft.
All known copies of the document were believed to be destroyed in 1973.
Turns out one survived — and is now available on Amazon.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237786</id>
	<title>Re:PDF Torrent?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259257320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No the real trick was it only contains material  available in any decent hand book of Magicans stagecraft and the The author made a huge CIA  pork barrel of tax payers money vanish.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No the real trick was it only contains material available in any decent hand book of Magicans stagecraft and the The author made a huge CIA pork barrel of tax payers money vanish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No the real trick was it only contains material  available in any decent hand book of Magicans stagecraft and the The author made a huge CIA  pork barrel of tax payers money vanish.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237422</id>
	<title>Direct Links Already</title>
	<author>angryphase</author>
	<datestamp>1259254140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>An article on Slashdot linking to The Huffington Post, talking about a Wired story talking about an item for sale on Amazon. No need for the book, misdirection is alive and well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>An article on Slashdot linking to The Huffington Post , talking about a Wired story talking about an item for sale on Amazon .
No need for the book , misdirection is alive and well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An article on Slashdot linking to The Huffington Post, talking about a Wired story talking about an item for sale on Amazon.
No need for the book, misdirection is alive and well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30249420</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>lsatenstein</author>
	<datestamp>1259319000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Our Canadian Prime Minister must have one at his bedside.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Our Canadian Prime Minister must have one at his bedside .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Our Canadian Prime Minister must have one at his bedside.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236728</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on, everybody has that on his hard disk</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1259249100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm... Now I really wonder where the &ldquo;flamebait&rdquo; part of my comment is supposed to be.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)<br>Or is this some special agent? If so: Hello there. I can see you.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;P</p><p>Disclaimer: I am not pro- or contra- anything. I just think that some idiot should stop beating their heads (and especially those of others) in over pointless shit.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) If that means you hate me, then I&rsquo;m proud of it. ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm... Now I really wonder where the    flamebait    part of my comment is supposed to be .
: ) Or is this some special agent ?
If so : Hello there .
I can see you .
; PDisclaimer : I am not pro- or contra- anything .
I just think that some idiot should stop beating their heads ( and especially those of others ) in over pointless shit .
: ) If that means you hate me , then I    m proud of it .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm... Now I really wonder where the “flamebait” part of my comment is supposed to be.
:)Or is this some special agent?
If so: Hello there.
I can see you.
;PDisclaimer: I am not pro- or contra- anything.
I just think that some idiot should stop beating their heads (and especially those of others) in over pointless shit.
:) If that means you hate me, then I’m proud of it.
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239820</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>hitnrunrambler</author>
	<datestamp>1259231460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><blockquote><div><p>"As they are tools they can be used for both Good and Evil purposes."</p></div></blockquote><p>I know what you mean, but that's the wrong terminology to be using when discussing Machiavelli and the school of realism (which is essentially what you're describing). It's nothing to do with "good" and "evil". It's only about power, and continuing the existence of the state by whatever means necessary.</p></div><p>Well you've convinced me...</p><p>From now on I shall stop thinking about governments in terms of "good" vs"evil", instead I will think of government in terms of "doesn't exist" vs "exists".<br>Where "doesn't exist" represents government that serves for the betterment of all humanity, and "exists" represents greedy, lying, murdering bastards.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p><p>It makes sense for the persons in power to look at things from the moral neutral; the perspective of 'What must I do to keep this power'.<br>As subjects of power, "good" vs "evil" are exactly the scales we should measure on. We MUST avoid moral neutrality, otherwise we become the tools of the government rather than government being a tool of the people.</p><p>The usage of the phrases good and evil have no value when coming from the top down, they should be very meaningful coming from the bottom up.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" As they are tools they can be used for both Good and Evil purposes .
" I know what you mean , but that 's the wrong terminology to be using when discussing Machiavelli and the school of realism ( which is essentially what you 're describing ) .
It 's nothing to do with " good " and " evil " .
It 's only about power , and continuing the existence of the state by whatever means necessary.Well you 've convinced me...From now on I shall stop thinking about governments in terms of " good " vs " evil " , instead I will think of government in terms of " does n't exist " vs " exists " .Where " does n't exist " represents government that serves for the betterment of all humanity , and " exists " represents greedy , lying , murdering bastards .
: -PIt makes sense for the persons in power to look at things from the moral neutral ; the perspective of 'What must I do to keep this power'.As subjects of power , " good " vs " evil " are exactly the scales we should measure on .
We MUST avoid moral neutrality , otherwise we become the tools of the government rather than government being a tool of the people.The usage of the phrases good and evil have no value when coming from the top down , they should be very meaningful coming from the bottom up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"As they are tools they can be used for both Good and Evil purposes.
"I know what you mean, but that's the wrong terminology to be using when discussing Machiavelli and the school of realism (which is essentially what you're describing).
It's nothing to do with "good" and "evil".
It's only about power, and continuing the existence of the state by whatever means necessary.Well you've convinced me...From now on I shall stop thinking about governments in terms of "good" vs"evil", instead I will think of government in terms of "doesn't exist" vs "exists".Where "doesn't exist" represents government that serves for the betterment of all humanity, and "exists" represents greedy, lying, murdering bastards.
:-PIt makes sense for the persons in power to look at things from the moral neutral; the perspective of 'What must I do to keep this power'.As subjects of power, "good" vs "evil" are exactly the scales we should measure on.
We MUST avoid moral neutrality, otherwise we become the tools of the government rather than government being a tool of the people.The usage of the phrases good and evil have no value when coming from the top down, they should be very meaningful coming from the bottom up.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236572</id>
	<title>Re:The original article?</title>
	<author>CharlyFoxtrot</author>
	<datestamp>1259247840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So the Slashdot summary links to an article in the Huffington Post.  And the HuffPo article links to an article in Wired.  And the Wired article links to the actual <a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2009/11/01/when\_the\_cia\_tried\_its\_hand\_at\_magic/" title="boston.com">story in the Boston Globe</a> [boston.com]</p> </div><p>Slashdot: now a free treasure hunt with every story !</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So the Slashdot summary links to an article in the Huffington Post .
And the HuffPo article links to an article in Wired .
And the Wired article links to the actual story in the Boston Globe [ boston.com ] Slashdot : now a free treasure hunt with every story !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the Slashdot summary links to an article in the Huffington Post.
And the HuffPo article links to an article in Wired.
And the Wired article links to the actual story in the Boston Globe [boston.com] Slashdot: now a free treasure hunt with every story !
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236980</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>Narpak</author>
	<datestamp>1259251020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The point of this is that believe it or not, every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book.</p></div><p>Without mentioning names I will say that I refuse to believe that "every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book". Some of their advisor(s) maybe. <br> <br> Frankly I also find it hard to believe that the Prince and the CIA manual are covering the exact same concepts in the exact same way. At best I would perhaps say that someone interested in this sort of literature could, or would, read both, as well as the Art of War.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>At the height of the Cold War, the Central Intelligence Agency paid $3,000 to renowned magician John Mulholland to write a manual on misdirection, concealment, and stagecraft.</p></div><p>I have yet to read The Prince's chapter on sleight of hand.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The point of this is that believe it or not , every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book.Without mentioning names I will say that I refuse to believe that " every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book " .
Some of their advisor ( s ) maybe .
Frankly I also find it hard to believe that the Prince and the CIA manual are covering the exact same concepts in the exact same way .
At best I would perhaps say that someone interested in this sort of literature could , or would , read both , as well as the Art of War.At the height of the Cold War , the Central Intelligence Agency paid $ 3,000 to renowned magician John Mulholland to write a manual on misdirection , concealment , and stagecraft.I have yet to read The Prince 's chapter on sleight of hand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The point of this is that believe it or not, every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book.Without mentioning names I will say that I refuse to believe that "every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book".
Some of their advisor(s) maybe.
Frankly I also find it hard to believe that the Prince and the CIA manual are covering the exact same concepts in the exact same way.
At best I would perhaps say that someone interested in this sort of literature could, or would, read both, as well as the Art of War.At the height of the Cold War, the Central Intelligence Agency paid $3,000 to renowned magician John Mulholland to write a manual on misdirection, concealment, and stagecraft.I have yet to read The Prince's chapter on sleight of hand.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236362</id>
	<title>Deception....</title>
	<author>cra</author>
	<datestamp>1259245860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, it looks like it worked, then...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , it looks like it worked , then.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, it looks like it worked, then...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237212</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on, everybody has that on his hard disk</title>
	<author>jaggeh</author>
	<datestamp>1259252700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wikileaks has a lot of it, up to date versions too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wikileaks has a lot of it , up to date versions too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wikileaks has a lot of it, up to date versions too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30242162</id>
	<title>Does it...</title>
	<author>Puppet Master</author>
	<datestamp>1259252580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>explain how David Copperfield made the Statue of Liberty disappear???
<p>
If not, then I don't want it.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>explain how David Copperfield made the Statue of Liberty disappear ? ? ?
If not , then I do n't want it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>explain how David Copperfield made the Statue of Liberty disappear???
If not, then I don't want it.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30242596</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on, everybody has that on his hard disk</title>
	<author>FragHARD</author>
	<datestamp>1259256900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yep. I seen quite a few 'Manuals' on the internet, never hurts to have a copy here &amp; there.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep .
I seen quite a few 'Manuals ' on the internet , never hurts to have a copy here &amp; there .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep.
I seen quite a few 'Manuals' on the internet, never hurts to have a copy here &amp; there.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236684</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>SpaghettiPattern</author>
	<datestamp>1259248620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did you ever read the prince? It's the K+R C Programming Language for politics. The book in TFA is about being a spy. I wouldn't say the topics are unrelated but one is a practical handbook and the other is on concepts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you ever read the prince ?
It 's the K + R C Programming Language for politics .
The book in TFA is about being a spy .
I would n't say the topics are unrelated but one is a practical handbook and the other is on concepts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you ever read the prince?
It's the K+R C Programming Language for politics.
The book in TFA is about being a spy.
I wouldn't say the topics are unrelated but one is a practical handbook and the other is on concepts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239014</id>
	<title>Re:The original article?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259266980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles\_all\_the\_way\_down" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">It's links all the way down.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's links all the way down .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's links all the way down.
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30243220</id>
	<title>Re:The original article?</title>
	<author>rrohbeck</author>
	<datestamp>1259265540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's links all the way down...<br>Hey maybe we can start a new set theory based on links.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's links all the way down...Hey maybe we can start a new set theory based on links .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's links all the way down...Hey maybe we can start a new set theory based on links.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236164</id>
	<title>Trickery and misdirection</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259244060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'Turns out one survived -- and is now available on Amazon'</p><p>Or at least, that's what they want you to think...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'Turns out one survived -- and is now available on Amazon'Or at least , that 's what they want you to think.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Turns out one survived -- and is now available on Amazon'Or at least, that's what they want you to think...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237732</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>jeffasselin</author>
	<datestamp>1259256840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Blackwater security are the equivalent of Renaissance mercenaries, and see what their use has resulted in. I think Machiavelli's points are still valid today if you update the setting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Blackwater security are the equivalent of Renaissance mercenaries , and see what their use has resulted in .
I think Machiavelli 's points are still valid today if you update the setting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blackwater security are the equivalent of Renaissance mercenaries, and see what their use has resulted in.
I think Machiavelli's points are still valid today if you update the setting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30241952</id>
	<title>Previously Published in Genii Magazine</title>
	<author>NotPeteMcCabe</author>
	<datestamp>1259249700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some if not most of Mulholland's manual was published in Genii Magazine (a magic magazine) within the last couple of years. if you want you can find a back issue; start at geniimagazine.com.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some if not most of Mulholland 's manual was published in Genii Magazine ( a magic magazine ) within the last couple of years .
if you want you can find a back issue ; start at geniimagazine.com .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some if not most of Mulholland's manual was published in Genii Magazine (a magic magazine) within the last couple of years.
if you want you can find a back issue; start at geniimagazine.com.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237822</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>mrogers</author>
	<datestamp>1259257500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The question of the reality of good and evil becomes more complicated, though, when a state depends in part on public opinion (at home or abroad) to remain powerful. For example, to secure allies for its foreign wars, the US must be seen to respect human rights and uphold democratic principles (if not democratic principals) - it must be "good" in order to be strong. I suppose that could be seen as a conflict between Machiavellian realism and the Platonic/Straussian realism of the noble lie.
<p>
But perhaps the conflict can be resolved with sufficiently good public relations machinery.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The question of the reality of good and evil becomes more complicated , though , when a state depends in part on public opinion ( at home or abroad ) to remain powerful .
For example , to secure allies for its foreign wars , the US must be seen to respect human rights and uphold democratic principles ( if not democratic principals ) - it must be " good " in order to be strong .
I suppose that could be seen as a conflict between Machiavellian realism and the Platonic/Straussian realism of the noble lie .
But perhaps the conflict can be resolved with sufficiently good public relations machinery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The question of the reality of good and evil becomes more complicated, though, when a state depends in part on public opinion (at home or abroad) to remain powerful.
For example, to secure allies for its foreign wars, the US must be seen to respect human rights and uphold democratic principles (if not democratic principals) - it must be "good" in order to be strong.
I suppose that could be seen as a conflict between Machiavellian realism and the Platonic/Straussian realism of the noble lie.
But perhaps the conflict can be resolved with sufficiently good public relations machinery.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236736</id>
	<title>silent weapons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259249220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the best such document i have seen has been silent weapons for quiet wars. really makes you think about the world in its current state... and the invented "problems" like economy, CO2 etc</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the best such document i have seen has been silent weapons for quiet wars .
really makes you think about the world in its current state... and the invented " problems " like economy , CO2 etc</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the best such document i have seen has been silent weapons for quiet wars.
really makes you think about the world in its current state... and the invented "problems" like economy, CO2 etc</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236880</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>Anonymusing</author>
	<datestamp>1259250300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book. </i>
</p><p>I bet half the college students in the U.S. have read it, too.  What's your point?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book .
I bet half the college students in the U.S. have read it , too .
What 's your point ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book.
I bet half the college students in the U.S. have read it, too.
What's your point?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236594</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on, everybody has that on his hard disk</title>
	<author>delvsional</author>
	<datestamp>1259248020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Could I get a zip file of all that?  please?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could I get a zip file of all that ?
please ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could I get a zip file of all that?
please?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236726</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>Ihlosi</author>
	<datestamp>1259249100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It is in the public domain and you can find linked copies from that page. The point of this is that believe it or not, every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book.</i> </p><p>"Machiavelli stands strongly against the use of mercenaries. He believes them useless to a ruler because they are undisciplined, cowardly, and without any loyalty, being motivated only by money."</p><p>Even if every single US president read the book, it appears some didn't do so thoroughly enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is in the public domain and you can find linked copies from that page .
The point of this is that believe it or not , every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book .
" Machiavelli stands strongly against the use of mercenaries .
He believes them useless to a ruler because they are undisciplined , cowardly , and without any loyalty , being motivated only by money .
" Even if every single US president read the book , it appears some did n't do so thoroughly enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is in the public domain and you can find linked copies from that page.
The point of this is that believe it or not, every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book.
"Machiavelli stands strongly against the use of mercenaries.
He believes them useless to a ruler because they are undisciplined, cowardly, and without any loyalty, being motivated only by money.
"Even if every single US president read the book, it appears some didn't do so thoroughly enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237098</id>
	<title>Ironic</title>
	<author>hallux.sinister</author>
	<datestamp>1259251800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Every time I see or hear of a reference to "The Prince", or a leader is referred to as Machiavellian, I smile at the irony.  Machiavelli was being SARCASTIC when he wrote that.  He was kidding!  Machiavelli was ahead of his time in holding the ideals of personal freedom and responsibility, equality, and all that jazz which are diametric opposites of the views espoused in "The Prince".  He worked hard as a politician to build Florence into a shining beacon of how a society should be run, and a family called the de' Medici came along, seized power, (using techniques from the, at the time, as-yet-unwritten book, "The Prince") and turned the shining beacon into a cesspool of corruption, with rampant nepotism, greed, etc.
<p>
Stripped of his position, and having been barred from holding any political office by the de' Medici, after a lifetime of public service, embittered, Machiavelli wrote "The Prince" basically saying: "if you want to grab, hold, and expand your political power," (adding under his breath, "like those de' Medici bastards,") he continued, "this is what you do..."  (He could not insult them openly, he had already been imprisoned and tortured by them once, and I guess he wasn't "feeling strong" anymore.)
</p><p>
It was not meant literally!  I guess the De Medici had the last laugh though, whether by their actions or not, Machiavelli's name is associated NOT with his own good and noble life's work, but with the behaviours and beliefs of those he most loathed and despised.  For a better idea of what this great Renaissance figure really thought, try instead his "Discorsi sulla prima deca di Tito Livio", or "Discourses on the first ten books of Livy", (Titus Livius, Roman historian)
</p><p>
~ Hallux</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every time I see or hear of a reference to " The Prince " , or a leader is referred to as Machiavellian , I smile at the irony .
Machiavelli was being SARCASTIC when he wrote that .
He was kidding !
Machiavelli was ahead of his time in holding the ideals of personal freedom and responsibility , equality , and all that jazz which are diametric opposites of the views espoused in " The Prince " .
He worked hard as a politician to build Florence into a shining beacon of how a society should be run , and a family called the de ' Medici came along , seized power , ( using techniques from the , at the time , as-yet-unwritten book , " The Prince " ) and turned the shining beacon into a cesspool of corruption , with rampant nepotism , greed , etc .
Stripped of his position , and having been barred from holding any political office by the de ' Medici , after a lifetime of public service , embittered , Machiavelli wrote " The Prince " basically saying : " if you want to grab , hold , and expand your political power , " ( adding under his breath , " like those de ' Medici bastards , " ) he continued , " this is what you do... " ( He could not insult them openly , he had already been imprisoned and tortured by them once , and I guess he was n't " feeling strong " anymore .
) It was not meant literally !
I guess the De Medici had the last laugh though , whether by their actions or not , Machiavelli 's name is associated NOT with his own good and noble life 's work , but with the behaviours and beliefs of those he most loathed and despised .
For a better idea of what this great Renaissance figure really thought , try instead his " Discorsi sulla prima deca di Tito Livio " , or " Discourses on the first ten books of Livy " , ( Titus Livius , Roman historian ) ~ Hallux</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every time I see or hear of a reference to "The Prince", or a leader is referred to as Machiavellian, I smile at the irony.
Machiavelli was being SARCASTIC when he wrote that.
He was kidding!
Machiavelli was ahead of his time in holding the ideals of personal freedom and responsibility, equality, and all that jazz which are diametric opposites of the views espoused in "The Prince".
He worked hard as a politician to build Florence into a shining beacon of how a society should be run, and a family called the de' Medici came along, seized power, (using techniques from the, at the time, as-yet-unwritten book, "The Prince") and turned the shining beacon into a cesspool of corruption, with rampant nepotism, greed, etc.
Stripped of his position, and having been barred from holding any political office by the de' Medici, after a lifetime of public service, embittered, Machiavelli wrote "The Prince" basically saying: "if you want to grab, hold, and expand your political power," (adding under his breath, "like those de' Medici bastards,") he continued, "this is what you do..."  (He could not insult them openly, he had already been imprisoned and tortured by them once, and I guess he wasn't "feeling strong" anymore.
)

It was not meant literally!
I guess the De Medici had the last laugh though, whether by their actions or not, Machiavelli's name is associated NOT with his own good and noble life's work, but with the behaviours and beliefs of those he most loathed and despised.
For a better idea of what this great Renaissance figure really thought, try instead his "Discorsi sulla prima deca di Tito Livio", or "Discourses on the first ten books of Livy", (Titus Livius, Roman historian)

~ Hallux</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237292</id>
	<title>Re:The original article?</title>
	<author>ozbird</author>
	<datestamp>1259253300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So the Slashdot summary links to an article in the Huffington Post. And the HuffPo article links to an article in Wired. And the Wired article links to the actual story in the Boston Globe.</p></div></blockquote><p>"Misdirection", check; give it a few minutes for "concealment" to kick in...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So the Slashdot summary links to an article in the Huffington Post .
And the HuffPo article links to an article in Wired .
And the Wired article links to the actual story in the Boston Globe .
" Misdirection " , check ; give it a few minutes for " concealment " to kick in.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the Slashdot summary links to an article in the Huffington Post.
And the HuffPo article links to an article in Wired.
And the Wired article links to the actual story in the Boston Globe.
"Misdirection", check; give it a few minutes for "concealment" to kick in...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259246940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Read a book called: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Prince" title="wikipedia.org">The Prince</a> [wikipedia.org] by Niccol&#242; Machiavelli.  It is about this exact topic.  It is in the public domain and you can find linked copies from that page.  The point of this is that believe it or not, every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book.  It details how to establish, consolidate, defend, and extend power.  The tools it employs include primarily manipulation in various forms.  As they are tools they can be used for both Good and Evil purposes.  It is up to you to add them to your own repertoire so you can then use them to fight for what you think is right.  If you don't you will be out maneuvered by those who have.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Read a book called : The Prince [ wikipedia.org ] by Niccol   Machiavelli .
It is about this exact topic .
It is in the public domain and you can find linked copies from that page .
The point of this is that believe it or not , every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book .
It details how to establish , consolidate , defend , and extend power .
The tools it employs include primarily manipulation in various forms .
As they are tools they can be used for both Good and Evil purposes .
It is up to you to add them to your own repertoire so you can then use them to fight for what you think is right .
If you do n't you will be out maneuvered by those who have .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read a book called: The Prince [wikipedia.org] by Niccolò Machiavelli.
It is about this exact topic.
It is in the public domain and you can find linked copies from that page.
The point of this is that believe it or not, every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book.
It details how to establish, consolidate, defend, and extend power.
The tools it employs include primarily manipulation in various forms.
As they are tools they can be used for both Good and Evil purposes.
It is up to you to add them to your own repertoire so you can then use them to fight for what you think is right.
If you don't you will be out maneuvered by those who have.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236560</id>
	<title>One copy?</title>
	<author>Cigarra</author>
	<datestamp>1259247780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The book is "in stock" in Amazon, and <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/11377" title="mozilla.org" rel="nofollow">Invisible Hand</a> [mozilla.org] showed me links to at least 4 other sites where they're selling it... So WTF?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The book is " in stock " in Amazon , and Invisible Hand [ mozilla.org ] showed me links to at least 4 other sites where they 're selling it... So WTF ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The book is "in stock" in Amazon, and Invisible Hand [mozilla.org] showed me links to at least 4 other sites where they're selling it... So WTF?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236506</id>
	<title>Re:Waves hand...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259247300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is not the book you are looking for.....move along.....</p></div><p>Tricks are what whores do for money, i do illusions</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not the book you are looking for.....move along.....Tricks are what whores do for money , i do illusions</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not the book you are looking for.....move along.....Tricks are what whores do for money, i do illusions
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236462</id>
	<title>Mandatory</title>
	<author>frozentier</author>
	<datestamp>1259246760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was under the impression that this book was mandatory reading for all U.S. politicians.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was under the impression that this book was mandatory reading for all U.S. politicians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was under the impression that this book was mandatory reading for all U.S. politicians.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237200</id>
	<title>Re:wow,Christmas gift is here.shoes,handbags,ect..</title>
	<author>coolforsale1215</author>
	<datestamp>1259252700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com]   Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival. Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services". Your satisfaction is our main pursue. You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs. Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products . Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing! Welcome to come next time ! Thank you! <a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76</a> [coolforsale.com]   (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!! Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello , In order to meet Christmas , Site launched Christmas spree , welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises , look forward to your arrival .
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is " Best quality , Best reputation , Best services " .
Your satisfaction is our main pursue .
You can find the best products from us , meeting your different needs .
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but do n't miss it.Select your favorite clothing !
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you !
http : //www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp ? id = s76 [ coolforsale.com ] ( Tracksuit w ) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket , Air jordan ( 1-24 ) shoes $ 33 Nike shox ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) $ 35 Handbags ( Coach lv fendi d&amp;g ) $ 35 Tshirts ( Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste ) $ 16 free shipping Thanks ! ! !
Advance wish you a merry Christmas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com]   Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival.
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services".
Your satisfaction is our main pursue.
You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing!
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you!
http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76 [coolforsale.com]   (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!!
Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238084</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on, everybody has that on his hard disk</title>
	<author>treuf</author>
	<datestamp>1259259360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jesus, you just fired Echelon with all those words !!!<br>Hopefully you didn't used Semtex or Javelin<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jesus , you just fired Echelon with all those words ! !
! Hopefully you did n't used Semtex or Javelin ... : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jesus, you just fired Echelon with all those words !!
!Hopefully you didn't used Semtex or Javelin ... :D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162</id>
	<title>wow</title>
	<author>runyonave</author>
	<datestamp>1259244060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I  know that they are deceptive, backstabbing and two-faced, but now I can found out how.

Criminals In Action.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know that they are deceptive , backstabbing and two-faced , but now I can found out how .
Criminals In Action .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I  know that they are deceptive, backstabbing and two-faced, but now I can found out how.
Criminals In Action.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236452</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on, everybody has that on his hard disk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259246640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most of those files were work of BBS users and can range anywhere from complete bullshit all the way to actually working stuff.</p><p>I guess you know this, but rest of slashdot could take a peek at those manuals here: <a href="http://textfiles.com/" title="textfiles.com">http://textfiles.com/</a> [textfiles.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of those files were work of BBS users and can range anywhere from complete bullshit all the way to actually working stuff.I guess you know this , but rest of slashdot could take a peek at those manuals here : http : //textfiles.com/ [ textfiles.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of those files were work of BBS users and can range anywhere from complete bullshit all the way to actually working stuff.I guess you know this, but rest of slashdot could take a peek at those manuals here: http://textfiles.com/ [textfiles.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237820</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>MRe\_nl</author>
	<datestamp>1259257500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FYI "Il Principe" doesn't mean "the Prince", but "the boss", or perhaps more precisely "number one".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FYI " Il Principe " does n't mean " the Prince " , but " the boss " , or perhaps more precisely " number one " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FYI "Il Principe" doesn't mean "the Prince", but "the boss", or perhaps more precisely "number one".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239518</id>
	<title>font</title>
	<author>andreyvul</author>
	<datestamp>1259228640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the font on the picture reminds me of the TTC font, for some reason.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the font on the picture reminds me of the TTC font , for some reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the font on the picture reminds me of the TTC font, for some reason.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237106</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1259251920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The chapters on mercenaries refer to Italian <i>conditierri</i> and are regarded as obsolete, of historical interest only.  You might consider that the disuse of mercenaries led to the draft, a great evil.  The other chapters on human nature are as valid as they've ever been.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The chapters on mercenaries refer to Italian conditierri and are regarded as obsolete , of historical interest only .
You might consider that the disuse of mercenaries led to the draft , a great evil .
The other chapters on human nature are as valid as they 've ever been .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The chapters on mercenaries refer to Italian conditierri and are regarded as obsolete, of historical interest only.
You might consider that the disuse of mercenaries led to the draft, a great evil.
The other chapters on human nature are as valid as they've ever been.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236382</id>
	<title>Amazon link</title>
	<author>The New Andy</author>
	<datestamp>1259246100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0061725897?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=boingboing06-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0061725897" title="amazon.com">Amazon link</a> [amazon.com] (from the article, which shows that the Huffington Post guys took it from boingboing... so if there is a referrer code in there, then it isn't mine).<p>

I much prefer a link to the book on amazon than a write up about how it exists there. Given that the book is "In Stock" for $15, I'm guessing this isn't the one remaining copy for sale<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Amazon link [ amazon.com ] ( from the article , which shows that the Huffington Post guys took it from boingboing... so if there is a referrer code in there , then it is n't mine ) .
I much prefer a link to the book on amazon than a write up about how it exists there .
Given that the book is " In Stock " for $ 15 , I 'm guessing this is n't the one remaining copy for sale : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amazon link [amazon.com] (from the article, which shows that the Huffington Post guys took it from boingboing... so if there is a referrer code in there, then it isn't mine).
I much prefer a link to the book on amazon than a write up about how it exists there.
Given that the book is "In Stock" for $15, I'm guessing this isn't the one remaining copy for sale :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237596</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>JustOK</author>
	<datestamp>1259255940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Machiavelli stands strongly against the use of mercenaries. He believes them useless to a ruler because they are undisciplined, cowardly, and without any loyalty, being motivated only by money."</p></div><p>That's what he wants you to think. That way, their price when he hires them is lower because of lower demand.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Machiavelli stands strongly against the use of mercenaries .
He believes them useless to a ruler because they are undisciplined , cowardly , and without any loyalty , being motivated only by money .
" That 's what he wants you to think .
That way , their price when he hires them is lower because of lower demand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Machiavelli stands strongly against the use of mercenaries.
He believes them useless to a ruler because they are undisciplined, cowardly, and without any loyalty, being motivated only by money.
"That's what he wants you to think.
That way, their price when he hires them is lower because of lower demand.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238340</id>
	<title>No.</title>
	<author>spun</author>
	<datestamp>1259261580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The Prince</i> is not a manual for how to run a government. It is meant as satire, a warning perhaps, to the people, about how sociopaths run a government. If you want something closer to a manual, read Machiavelli's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discourses\_on\_Livy" title="wikipedia.org"> <i>Discourses on Livy</i> </a> [wikipedia.org], a book about how to run a Republic rather than a Tyranny.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Prince is not a manual for how to run a government .
It is meant as satire , a warning perhaps , to the people , about how sociopaths run a government .
If you want something closer to a manual , read Machiavelli 's Discourses on Livy [ wikipedia.org ] , a book about how to run a Republic rather than a Tyranny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Prince is not a manual for how to run a government.
It is meant as satire, a warning perhaps, to the people, about how sociopaths run a government.
If you want something closer to a manual, read Machiavelli's  Discourses on Livy  [wikipedia.org], a book about how to run a Republic rather than a Tyranny.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30252114</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic</title>
	<author>moosesocks</author>
	<datestamp>1259338320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Every time I see or hear of a reference to "The Prince", or a leader is referred to as Machiavellian, I smile at the irony. Machiavelli was being SARCASTIC when he wrote that. He was kidding!</p></div><p>As others in this thread have mentioned, this is a minority view amongst the scholarly community.  Machiavelli certainly had one hell of a motive to sabotage the Medici government, although <i>The Prince</i> would have had to have been one hell of a subtle piece of sabotage.</p><p>In either event, it <i>is</i> generally accepted that <i>The Prince</i> holds up extremely well to logical scrutiny, and is consistent with the rest of his writings.  There are a few troubling items in his chapter on military strategy that would appear to be patently bad advice, although it is debatable whether or not this was intentional.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Every time I see or hear of a reference to " The Prince " , or a leader is referred to as Machiavellian , I smile at the irony .
Machiavelli was being SARCASTIC when he wrote that .
He was kidding ! As others in this thread have mentioned , this is a minority view amongst the scholarly community .
Machiavelli certainly had one hell of a motive to sabotage the Medici government , although The Prince would have had to have been one hell of a subtle piece of sabotage.In either event , it is generally accepted that The Prince holds up extremely well to logical scrutiny , and is consistent with the rest of his writings .
There are a few troubling items in his chapter on military strategy that would appear to be patently bad advice , although it is debatable whether or not this was intentional .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every time I see or hear of a reference to "The Prince", or a leader is referred to as Machiavellian, I smile at the irony.
Machiavelli was being SARCASTIC when he wrote that.
He was kidding!As others in this thread have mentioned, this is a minority view amongst the scholarly community.
Machiavelli certainly had one hell of a motive to sabotage the Medici government, although The Prince would have had to have been one hell of a subtle piece of sabotage.In either event, it is generally accepted that The Prince holds up extremely well to logical scrutiny, and is consistent with the rest of his writings.
There are a few troubling items in his chapter on military strategy that would appear to be patently bad advice, although it is debatable whether or not this was intentional.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30278664</id>
	<title>WWII "Magic"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259596260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Both the British and Americans employed magicians during WWII to the same ends.</p><p>The British had Jasper Maskelyne (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jasper\_Maskelyne#Wartime\_trickery)</p><p>and the U.S. had a team of magicians, artists and designers whose job it was to simulate troops, tanks, and arty where there was none. One of this team was designer Bill Blass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Both the British and Americans employed magicians during WWII to the same ends.The British had Jasper Maskelyne ( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jasper \ _Maskelyne # Wartime \ _trickery ) and the U.S. had a team of magicians , artists and designers whose job it was to simulate troops , tanks , and arty where there was none .
One of this team was designer Bill Blass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Both the British and Americans employed magicians during WWII to the same ends.The British had Jasper Maskelyne (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jasper\_Maskelyne#Wartime\_trickery)and the U.S. had a team of magicians, artists and designers whose job it was to simulate troops, tanks, and arty where there was none.
One of this team was designer Bill Blass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237572</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>mrogers</author>
	<datestamp>1259255760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The point of this is that believe it or not, every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Perhaps not every single one. About ten years ago I borrowed <i>The Prince</i> from a girlfriend who was studying politics; half the book is devoted to warnings against relying on mercenaries in foreign wars, and I remember asking myself, "What contemporary leader would be stupid enough to do <i>that</i>?"
</p><p>
Now I know.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The point of this is that believe it or not , every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book .
Perhaps not every single one .
About ten years ago I borrowed The Prince from a girlfriend who was studying politics ; half the book is devoted to warnings against relying on mercenaries in foreign wars , and I remember asking myself , " What contemporary leader would be stupid enough to do that ?
" Now I know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The point of this is that believe it or not, every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book.
Perhaps not every single one.
About ten years ago I borrowed The Prince from a girlfriend who was studying politics; half the book is devoted to warnings against relying on mercenaries in foreign wars, and I remember asking myself, "What contemporary leader would be stupid enough to do that?
"

Now I know.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237772</id>
	<title>Re:PDF Torrent?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259257200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know where you get your information but generally contract work is also fully owned by the government, including any copyrights (I say this as a government contractor).  It's an exception when this is not the case.</p><p>And yeah, this doesn't really fall under a FOIA request.  A lot of stuff is just public domain and easily available to any citizen wanting it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know where you get your information but generally contract work is also fully owned by the government , including any copyrights ( I say this as a government contractor ) .
It 's an exception when this is not the case.And yeah , this does n't really fall under a FOIA request .
A lot of stuff is just public domain and easily available to any citizen wanting it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know where you get your information but generally contract work is also fully owned by the government, including any copyrights (I say this as a government contractor).
It's an exception when this is not the case.And yeah, this doesn't really fall under a FOIA request.
A lot of stuff is just public domain and easily available to any citizen wanting it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236968</id>
	<title>Re:Waves hand...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259250960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More like the NYT handbook anymore.</htmltext>
<tokenext>More like the NYT handbook anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More like the NYT handbook anymore.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238818</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1259265360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I think it's a bit simplistic to say that good and evil don't come into it. Clearly Machiavelli thinks of stability as "good", in fact a higher good than conventional rules of morality. If the  stability of the state requires that some individual be wronged, then that is preferable to anarchy where all suffer.</p><p>I don't think Old Nick is as amoral as he is considered to be by many. He simply does not proceed from the axiom that doing the most right overall comes from doing the most right for each individual the state's actions affect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I think it 's a bit simplistic to say that good and evil do n't come into it .
Clearly Machiavelli thinks of stability as " good " , in fact a higher good than conventional rules of morality .
If the stability of the state requires that some individual be wronged , then that is preferable to anarchy where all suffer.I do n't think Old Nick is as amoral as he is considered to be by many .
He simply does not proceed from the axiom that doing the most right overall comes from doing the most right for each individual the state 's actions affect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I think it's a bit simplistic to say that good and evil don't come into it.
Clearly Machiavelli thinks of stability as "good", in fact a higher good than conventional rules of morality.
If the  stability of the state requires that some individual be wronged, then that is preferable to anarchy where all suffer.I don't think Old Nick is as amoral as he is considered to be by many.
He simply does not proceed from the axiom that doing the most right overall comes from doing the most right for each individual the state's actions affect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237132</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259252160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read "The Prince", but it's not very useful for manipulation. It's more focused on diplomacy.</p><p>IMHO, the best one is "How to Win Friends and Influence People" by Dale Carnegie.</p><p>Much more practical than "The Prince", and it works !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read " The Prince " , but it 's not very useful for manipulation .
It 's more focused on diplomacy.IMHO , the best one is " How to Win Friends and Influence People " by Dale Carnegie.Much more practical than " The Prince " , and it works !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read "The Prince", but it's not very useful for manipulation.
It's more focused on diplomacy.IMHO, the best one is "How to Win Friends and Influence People" by Dale Carnegie.Much more practical than "The Prince", and it works !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236680</id>
	<title>The Cake.Is.A lie</title>
	<author>VShael</author>
	<datestamp>1259248620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>doncha know...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>doncha know.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>doncha know...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236170</id>
	<title>PDF Torrent?</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1259244060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the rest of us, since only one lucky person will get the dead tree prize.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the rest of us , since only one lucky person will get the dead tree prize .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the rest of us, since only one lucky person will get the dead tree prize.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236224</id>
	<title>Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,Christmas gifts,Is here</title>
	<author>coolforsale127</author>
	<datestamp>1259244660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com]
Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the  there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival. Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services". Your satisfaction is our main pursue. You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.
Ladies and Gentlemen  weicome  to  my  coolforsale.com.Here,there  are   the   most   fashion   products . Pass by but don't   miss  it.Select  your  favorite  clothing!  Welcome  to come  next   time ! Thank you!     <a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76</a> [coolforsale.com] (Tracksuit w)
ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket,
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35
Tshirts (Polo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
free shipping
Thanks!!! Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello , In order to meet Christmas , Site launched Christmas spree , welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises , look forward to your arrival .
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is " Best quality , Best reputation , Best services " .
Your satisfaction is our main pursue .
You can find the best products from us , meeting your different needs .
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but do n't miss it.Select your favorite clothing !
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you !
http : //www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp ? id = s76 [ coolforsale.com ] ( Tracksuit w ) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket , Air jordan ( 1-24 ) shoes $ 33 Nike shox ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) $ 35 Handbags ( Coach lv fendi d&amp;g ) $ 35 Tshirts ( Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste ) $ 16 free shipping Thanks ! ! !
Advance wish you a merry Christmas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com]
Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the  there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival.
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services".
Your satisfaction is our main pursue.
You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.
Ladies and Gentlemen  weicome  to  my  coolforsale.com.Here,there  are   the   most   fashion   products .
Pass by but don't   miss  it.Select  your  favorite  clothing!
Welcome  to come  next   time !
Thank you!
http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76 [coolforsale.com] (Tracksuit w)
ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket,
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
free shipping
Thanks!!!
Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238902</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>dogmatixpsych</author>
	<datestamp>1259266020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I cannot imagine to which presidents you are referring. Maybe Jimmy Carter didn't read it or Ronald Reagan. Maybe John Kennedy or Dwight Eisenhower did not. Maybe Bill Clinton or Barack Obama did not. Maybe George W. Bush did not (although, he is more likely to have read it because he reads so much): <a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060817/17bushbooks.htm" title="usnews.com">http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060817/17bushbooks.htm</a> [usnews.com] <br> <br>and: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/29/AR2008122901896.html" title="washingtonpost.com">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/29/AR2008122901896.html</a> [washingtonpost.com] <br> <br>and: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123025595706634689.html" title="wsj.com">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123025595706634689.html</a> [wsj.com] <br> <br>
Anyway, I've read portions of The Prince and was not impressed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can not imagine to which presidents you are referring .
Maybe Jimmy Carter did n't read it or Ronald Reagan .
Maybe John Kennedy or Dwight Eisenhower did not .
Maybe Bill Clinton or Barack Obama did not .
Maybe George W. Bush did not ( although , he is more likely to have read it because he reads so much ) : http : //www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060817/17bushbooks.htm [ usnews.com ] and : http : //www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/29/AR2008122901896.html [ washingtonpost.com ] and : http : //online.wsj.com/article/SB123025595706634689.html [ wsj.com ] Anyway , I 've read portions of The Prince and was not impressed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I cannot imagine to which presidents you are referring.
Maybe Jimmy Carter didn't read it or Ronald Reagan.
Maybe John Kennedy or Dwight Eisenhower did not.
Maybe Bill Clinton or Barack Obama did not.
Maybe George W. Bush did not (although, he is more likely to have read it because he reads so much): http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060817/17bushbooks.htm [usnews.com]  and: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/29/AR2008122901896.html [washingtonpost.com]  and: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123025595706634689.html [wsj.com]  
Anyway, I've read portions of The Prince and was not impressed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236302</id>
	<title>The original article?</title>
	<author>Sara Chan</author>
	<datestamp>1259245320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>So the Slashdot summary links to an article in the Huffington Post.  And the HuffPo article links to an article in Wired.  And the Wired article links to the actual <a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2009/11/01/when\_the\_cia\_tried\_its\_hand\_at\_magic/" title="boston.com" rel="nofollow">story in the Boston Globe</a> [boston.com].
<br> <br>
Genius idea: have the Slashdot summary link to the actual story.  YES!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>So the Slashdot summary links to an article in the Huffington Post .
And the HuffPo article links to an article in Wired .
And the Wired article links to the actual story in the Boston Globe [ boston.com ] .
Genius idea : have the Slashdot summary link to the actual story .
YES ! ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the Slashdot summary links to an article in the Huffington Post.
And the HuffPo article links to an article in Wired.
And the Wired article links to the actual story in the Boston Globe [boston.com].
Genius idea: have the Slashdot summary link to the actual story.
YES!!!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236602</id>
	<title>Re:Some readers don't much of it.</title>
	<author>fnj</author>
	<datestamp>1259248080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, 1 out of 4 reviewers has given it 2 stars.  Two others gave it 4 stars and the last gave it 5 stars.  Seems like the consensus is that's it's a cool read.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , 1 out of 4 reviewers has given it 2 stars .
Two others gave it 4 stars and the last gave it 5 stars .
Seems like the consensus is that 's it 's a cool read .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, 1 out of 4 reviewers has given it 2 stars.
Two others gave it 4 stars and the last gave it 5 stars.
Seems like the consensus is that's it's a cool read.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239160</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on, everybody has that on his hard disk</title>
	<author>EdIII</author>
	<datestamp>1259268360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>termite</p></div></blockquote><p>I knew those little buggers were organized, but not that they were for hire.</p><p>Hmmm.</p><p>The More You Know<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>termiteI knew those little buggers were organized , but not that they were for hire.Hmmm.The More You Know : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>termiteI knew those little buggers were organized, but not that they were for hire.Hmmm.The More You Know :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238510</id>
	<title>Do no Evil loses its meaning? Argghh ....</title>
	<author>Zero\_\_Kelvin</author>
	<datestamp>1259262960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>""Good" and "evil" simply do not apply as most people would understand them; that's a moral code used for propaganda i.e. whatever we do is "good", while whatever they do is "evil"</p></div></blockquote><p>Great.  Now Google has to change their slogan to "Do no Microsofty things"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" " Good " and " evil " simply do not apply as most people would understand them ; that 's a moral code used for propaganda i.e .
whatever we do is " good " , while whatever they do is " evil " Great .
Now Google has to change their slogan to " Do no Microsofty things "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>""Good" and "evil" simply do not apply as most people would understand them; that's a moral code used for propaganda i.e.
whatever we do is "good", while whatever they do is "evil"Great.
Now Google has to change their slogan to "Do no Microsofty things"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236428</id>
	<title>Imporvised Munitions Black Book</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259246520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is the one you're looking for. Published by Paladin and available as a torrent...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is the one you 're looking for .
Published by Paladin and available as a torrent.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is the one you're looking for.
Published by Paladin and available as a torrent...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239562</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1259229180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;I&gt;The point of this is that believe it or not, every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book.</p><p>I choose not. As does any rational person. Go take your pills.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I &gt; The point of this is that believe it or not , every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book.I choose not .
As does any rational person .
Go take your pills .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;I&gt;The point of this is that believe it or not, every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book.I choose not.
As does any rational person.
Go take your pills.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236450</id>
	<title>I just ordered 2</title>
	<author>N0t4v41l4bl3</author>
	<datestamp>1259246640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Last copy eh?

Why then does Amazon let me buy in multiples?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Last copy eh ?
Why then does Amazon let me buy in multiples ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last copy eh?
Why then does Amazon let me buy in multiples?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236296</id>
	<title>Re:PDF Torrent?</title>
	<author>Tink2000</author>
	<datestamp>1259245260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Er... parent not insightful, unless one believes the summary implicitly. At the cost of $10.99 (plus shipping), I'm pretty sure they've mass produced this sucker, or else the info is absolutely worthless (*stage whisper* DO NOT SEEK THE TREASURE!).</p><p>One of the questions raised on the Amazon page is: shouldn't this material be public domain? It is owned by the US Government and any copyright would seem to have expired at this point, and moreover it seems like we should be able to get a copy for free under the FOIA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Er... parent not insightful , unless one believes the summary implicitly .
At the cost of $ 10.99 ( plus shipping ) , I 'm pretty sure they 've mass produced this sucker , or else the info is absolutely worthless ( * stage whisper * DO NOT SEEK THE TREASURE !
) .One of the questions raised on the Amazon page is : should n't this material be public domain ?
It is owned by the US Government and any copyright would seem to have expired at this point , and moreover it seems like we should be able to get a copy for free under the FOIA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Er... parent not insightful, unless one believes the summary implicitly.
At the cost of $10.99 (plus shipping), I'm pretty sure they've mass produced this sucker, or else the info is absolutely worthless (*stage whisper* DO NOT SEEK THE TREASURE!
).One of the questions raised on the Amazon page is: shouldn't this material be public domain?
It is owned by the US Government and any copyright would seem to have expired at this point, and moreover it seems like we should be able to get a copy for free under the FOIA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237360</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>foniksonik</author>
	<datestamp>1259253720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's a great book called the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_48\_Laws\_of\_Power" title="wikipedia.org">48 laws of power</a> [wikipedia.org] which uses exampled from all of the above and more to illustrate various concepts related to getting, keeping and using power and position of influence.</p><p>Just FYI to anyone interested in such things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a great book called the 48 laws of power [ wikipedia.org ] which uses exampled from all of the above and more to illustrate various concepts related to getting , keeping and using power and position of influence.Just FYI to anyone interested in such things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a great book called the 48 laws of power [wikipedia.org] which uses exampled from all of the above and more to illustrate various concepts related to getting, keeping and using power and position of influence.Just FYI to anyone interested in such things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237164</id>
	<title>Re:The original article?</title>
	<author>jcombel</author>
	<datestamp>1259252460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So the Slashdot summary links to an article in the Huffington Post.  And the HuffPo article links to an article in Wired.  And the Wired article links to the actual <a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2009/11/01/when\_the\_cia\_tried\_its\_hand\_at\_magic/" title="boston.com" rel="nofollow">story in the Boston Globe</a> [boston.com].



Genius idea: have the Slashdot summary link to the actual story.  YES!!!</p></div><p>i am upvoting you with my mind</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So the Slashdot summary links to an article in the Huffington Post .
And the HuffPo article links to an article in Wired .
And the Wired article links to the actual story in the Boston Globe [ boston.com ] .
Genius idea : have the Slashdot summary link to the actual story .
YES ! ! ! i am upvoting you with my mind</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the Slashdot summary links to an article in the Huffington Post.
And the HuffPo article links to an article in Wired.
And the Wired article links to the actual story in the Boston Globe [boston.com].
Genius idea: have the Slashdot summary link to the actual story.
YES!!!i am upvoting you with my mind
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236568</id>
	<title>Re:PDF Torrent?</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1259247780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; One of the questions raised on the Amazon page is: shouldn't this material<br>&gt; be public domain? It is owned by the US Government...</p><p>If the author wrote thing as a US Government employee then the goverment is the author and is not permitted to enforce its copyright.  If he was acting as a contractor he is the author in which case he may still own the copyright.</p><p>&gt;<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...and any copyright would seem to have expired at this point...</p><p>Not yet.</p><p>&gt;<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...it seems like we should be able to get a copy for free under the FOIA.</p><p>The FOIA does not work the way you think it does.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; One of the questions raised on the Amazon page is : should n't this material &gt; be public domain ?
It is owned by the US Government...If the author wrote thing as a US Government employee then the goverment is the author and is not permitted to enforce its copyright .
If he was acting as a contractor he is the author in which case he may still own the copyright. &gt; ...and any copyright would seem to have expired at this point...Not yet. &gt; ...it seems like we should be able to get a copy for free under the FOIA.The FOIA does not work the way you think it does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; One of the questions raised on the Amazon page is: shouldn't this material&gt; be public domain?
It is owned by the US Government...If the author wrote thing as a US Government employee then the goverment is the author and is not permitted to enforce its copyright.
If he was acting as a contractor he is the author in which case he may still own the copyright.&gt; ...and any copyright would seem to have expired at this point...Not yet.&gt; ...it seems like we should be able to get a copy for free under the FOIA.The FOIA does not work the way you think it does.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237118</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>NightlordTW</author>
	<datestamp>1259252100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I rather believe current presidents became what they are because they have the skills as Machiavelli explained. Only geeks like us would read a book like that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I rather believe current presidents became what they are because they have the skills as Machiavelli explained .
Only geeks like us would read a book like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I rather believe current presidents became what they are because they have the skills as Machiavelli explained.
Only geeks like us would read a book like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237524</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1259255160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Almost sounds like the guy read Sun Tzu art of war and translated it for himself in italian or latin and then ended up having his own book.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Almost sounds like the guy read Sun Tzu art of war and translated it for himself in italian or latin and then ended up having his own book .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Almost sounds like the guy read Sun Tzu art of war and translated it for himself in italian or latin and then ended up having his own book.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237130</id>
	<title>Re:PDF Torrent?</title>
	<author>hallux.sinister</author>
	<datestamp>1259252160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The cake is a lie!  What better way to boost sales than by suggesting you shouldn't or oughtn't or flat-out <b>can't</b> have/read this book?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The cake is a lie !
What better way to boost sales than by suggesting you should n't or ought n't or flat-out ca n't have/read this book ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The cake is a lie!
What better way to boost sales than by suggesting you shouldn't or oughtn't or flat-out can't have/read this book?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236534</id>
	<title>Re:Waves hand...</title>
	<author>camperslo</author>
	<datestamp>1259247540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This is not the book you are looking for.....move along.....</i></p><p>The FOX employee training manual??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not the book you are looking for.....move along.....The FOX employee training manual ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not the book you are looking for.....move along.....The FOX employee training manual?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30317534</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259839200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Read a book called: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Prince" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">The Prince</a> [wikipedia.org] by Niccol&#242; Machiavelli.  It is about this exact topic.  It is in the public domain and you can find linked copies from that page.  The point of this is that believe it or not, every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book. e.</p></div><p>Are you suggesting that Bush can read?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Read a book called : The Prince [ wikipedia.org ] by Niccol   Machiavelli .
It is about this exact topic .
It is in the public domain and you can find linked copies from that page .
The point of this is that believe it or not , every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book .
e.Are you suggesting that Bush can read ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read a book called: The Prince [wikipedia.org] by Niccolò Machiavelli.
It is about this exact topic.
It is in the public domain and you can find linked copies from that page.
The point of this is that believe it or not, every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book.
e.Are you suggesting that Bush can read?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236300</id>
	<title>Some readers don't much of it.</title>
	<author>NoYob</author>
	<datestamp>1259245320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The manual is of some historic value as a relic of the 1950s, when we were actually trying to murder Castro with exploding cigars, but John Mulholland's actual manuals seem of little practical use, even then. Oh, I suppose there's some value in learning how to drop Roofies in your date's drink while lighting her cigarette, but the techniques developed by Mulholland wouldn't have passed muster at "The Man from Uncle." It was more "Get Smart" stuff.</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/review/R21EC78YTR1EZA/ref=cm\_cr\_pr\_viewpnt#R21EC78YTR1EZA" title="amazon.com" rel="nofollow"> Review here...</a> [amazon.com] </p><p>So, it's not all that. </p><p>There's a Kindel version so, I guess there will be a torrent?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The manual is of some historic value as a relic of the 1950s , when we were actually trying to murder Castro with exploding cigars , but John Mulholland 's actual manuals seem of little practical use , even then .
Oh , I suppose there 's some value in learning how to drop Roofies in your date 's drink while lighting her cigarette , but the techniques developed by Mulholland would n't have passed muster at " The Man from Uncle .
" It was more " Get Smart " stuff .
Review here... [ amazon.com ] So , it 's not all that .
There 's a Kindel version so , I guess there will be a torrent ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The manual is of some historic value as a relic of the 1950s, when we were actually trying to murder Castro with exploding cigars, but John Mulholland's actual manuals seem of little practical use, even then.
Oh, I suppose there's some value in learning how to drop Roofies in your date's drink while lighting her cigarette, but the techniques developed by Mulholland wouldn't have passed muster at "The Man from Uncle.
" It was more "Get Smart" stuff.
Review here... [amazon.com] So, it's not all that.
There's a Kindel version so, I guess there will be a torrent?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236236</id>
	<title>Trickery?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259244780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Trickery" is what I do to my wife's asshole. I start by teasing her cunt with my finger, then after a few seconds I jam it up her ass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Trickery " is what I do to my wife 's asshole .
I start by teasing her cunt with my finger , then after a few seconds I jam it up her ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Trickery" is what I do to my wife's asshole.
I start by teasing her cunt with my finger, then after a few seconds I jam it up her ass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236328</id>
	<title>slashvert</title>
	<author>cOldhandle</author>
	<datestamp>1259245560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The summary is just a very misleading slashvert, it makes it seem like one original copy is for sale. It is just some document that has been declassified and is now being published in a hardcover book...</htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary is just a very misleading slashvert , it makes it seem like one original copy is for sale .
It is just some document that has been declassified and is now being published in a hardcover book.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary is just a very misleading slashvert, it makes it seem like one original copy is for sale.
It is just some document that has been declassified and is now being published in a hardcover book...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236426</id>
	<title>This has been out for years</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259246520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The whole manuscript was published in a magicians' monthly magazine called "Genii" several years ago.  Granted, it is a fascinating read, but it was not "just discovered".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The whole manuscript was published in a magicians ' monthly magazine called " Genii " several years ago .
Granted , it is a fascinating read , but it was not " just discovered " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The whole manuscript was published in a magicians' monthly magazine called "Genii" several years ago.
Granted, it is a fascinating read, but it was not "just discovered".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236718</id>
	<title>Re:Trickery and misdirection</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259249040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>dundunduuuuuuuuuuuuuuun...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>dundunduuuuuuuuuuuuuuun.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dundunduuuuuuuuuuuuuuun...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30244082</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1259319540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, the people running the show right now have also read <em>The Prince</em> and they are not repeat not relying on mercenaries. They are using the mercenaries for specific purposes to which they are ideally suited. If you think that the excesses of mercenaries have not been accounted for and specifically invited, you're not thinking hard enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , the people running the show right now have also read The Prince and they are not repeat not relying on mercenaries .
They are using the mercenaries for specific purposes to which they are ideally suited .
If you think that the excesses of mercenaries have not been accounted for and specifically invited , you 're not thinking hard enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, the people running the show right now have also read The Prince and they are not repeat not relying on mercenaries.
They are using the mercenaries for specific purposes to which they are ideally suited.
If you think that the excesses of mercenaries have not been accounted for and specifically invited, you're not thinking hard enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237462</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1259254560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think that any leader really needs to read a book to learn to "establish, consolidate, defend, and extend power". The fact that they attain leadership means that they've been selected for having those abilities.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think that any leader really needs to read a book to learn to " establish , consolidate , defend , and extend power " .
The fact that they attain leadership means that they 've been selected for having those abilities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think that any leader really needs to read a book to learn to "establish, consolidate, defend, and extend power".
The fact that they attain leadership means that they've been selected for having those abilities.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237022</id>
	<title>A Manual for the Obvious</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259251320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If anyone needs a training manual to outline those obvious "tricks," it does not say much for his intelligence and inventiveness.  Any schoolboy has reinvented those deceptions many times over.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If anyone needs a training manual to outline those obvious " tricks , " it does not say much for his intelligence and inventiveness .
Any schoolboy has reinvented those deceptions many times over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If anyone needs a training manual to outline those obvious "tricks," it does not say much for his intelligence and inventiveness.
Any schoolboy has reinvented those deceptions many times over.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236352</id>
	<title>Oh come on, everybody has that on his hard disk!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259245680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It&rsquo;s not particularly hard to find. Amongst the things that I found on eDonkey, some old anarchy sites, etc, are tons of CIA and army manuals about questionable topics. The one I found particularly nice was a guide that explained to you how to get a major or other politician off his post, or even killed, trough small nudges here and there in the town. Talk to someone here, do this there, and let the event cascade roll into a avalanche that breaks his neck.<br>Then of course torture and interrogation manuals, building bombs and healing yourself in emergency situations or covert operations, etc. etc. etc. Everything from TNT over Napalm, termite, picking locks, spying on people, spy protection, and ten years ago I found a complete technical description of how to build a nuclear bomb. With a text file attached, saying to ask there and there when you&rsquo;d find yourself in need for the &ldquo;materials&rdquo; to build it. ^^<br>Luckily I was only angry at my dad, and not at any country, back then. ^^<br>Hmm... I wonder if I still have them somewhere... probably locked away in a archive with military-grade encryption that I forgot the password to.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It    s not particularly hard to find .
Amongst the things that I found on eDonkey , some old anarchy sites , etc , are tons of CIA and army manuals about questionable topics .
The one I found particularly nice was a guide that explained to you how to get a major or other politician off his post , or even killed , trough small nudges here and there in the town .
Talk to someone here , do this there , and let the event cascade roll into a avalanche that breaks his neck.Then of course torture and interrogation manuals , building bombs and healing yourself in emergency situations or covert operations , etc .
etc. etc .
Everything from TNT over Napalm , termite , picking locks , spying on people , spy protection , and ten years ago I found a complete technical description of how to build a nuclear bomb .
With a text file attached , saying to ask there and there when you    d find yourself in need for the    materials    to build it .
^ ^ Luckily I was only angry at my dad , and not at any country , back then .
^ ^ Hmm... I wonder if I still have them somewhere... probably locked away in a archive with military-grade encryption that I forgot the password to .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It’s not particularly hard to find.
Amongst the things that I found on eDonkey, some old anarchy sites, etc, are tons of CIA and army manuals about questionable topics.
The one I found particularly nice was a guide that explained to you how to get a major or other politician off his post, or even killed, trough small nudges here and there in the town.
Talk to someone here, do this there, and let the event cascade roll into a avalanche that breaks his neck.Then of course torture and interrogation manuals, building bombs and healing yourself in emergency situations or covert operations, etc.
etc. etc.
Everything from TNT over Napalm, termite, picking locks, spying on people, spy protection, and ten years ago I found a complete technical description of how to build a nuclear bomb.
With a text file attached, saying to ask there and there when you’d find yourself in need for the “materials” to build it.
^^Luckily I was only angry at my dad, and not at any country, back then.
^^Hmm... I wonder if I still have them somewhere... probably locked away in a archive with military-grade encryption that I forgot the password to.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30241378</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259244240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are likely to be similarities... after all, I'm sure John Mulholland read The Prince and The Art of War prior to writing this book -- they would be an excellent base for him to learn how to apply his own unique skills in the political arena.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are likely to be similarities... after all , I 'm sure John Mulholland read The Prince and The Art of War prior to writing this book -- they would be an excellent base for him to learn how to apply his own unique skills in the political arena .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are likely to be similarities... after all, I'm sure John Mulholland read The Prince and The Art of War prior to writing this book -- they would be an excellent base for him to learn how to apply his own unique skills in the political arena.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237920</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic</title>
	<author>forand</author>
	<datestamp>1259258340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have to disagree with your assertion that Machiavelli was sarcastic. He was bitter and discontent with the destruction of the Florentine Republic but he accurately described the methods used in its destruction. Those methods were and are how governments stay in power. Finally, while he may not like his name associated with this method his description became so ubiquitous that it has and his desires are lost to history.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to disagree with your assertion that Machiavelli was sarcastic .
He was bitter and discontent with the destruction of the Florentine Republic but he accurately described the methods used in its destruction .
Those methods were and are how governments stay in power .
Finally , while he may not like his name associated with this method his description became so ubiquitous that it has and his desires are lost to history .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to disagree with your assertion that Machiavelli was sarcastic.
He was bitter and discontent with the destruction of the Florentine Republic but he accurately described the methods used in its destruction.
Those methods were and are how governments stay in power.
Finally, while he may not like his name associated with this method his description became so ubiquitous that it has and his desires are lost to history.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236178</id>
	<title>Waves hand...</title>
	<author>aquabat</author>
	<datestamp>1259244240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is not the book you are looking for.....move along.....</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not the book you are looking for.....move along.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not the book you are looking for.....move along.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236964</id>
	<title>Summary is wrong</title>
	<author>krou</author>
	<datestamp>1259250900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It didn't first surface on Amazon and then become available. If you actually read the article (at the Boston Globe and Wired), it's available for sale on Amazon, but it originally got declassified by the CIA itself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It did n't first surface on Amazon and then become available .
If you actually read the article ( at the Boston Globe and Wired ) , it 's available for sale on Amazon , but it originally got declassified by the CIA itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It didn't first surface on Amazon and then become available.
If you actually read the article (at the Boston Globe and Wired), it's available for sale on Amazon, but it originally got declassified by the CIA itself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239372</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on, everybody has that on his hard disk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259227200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you mean the CIA doesn't have manuals with those kinds of instructions, doesn't do those kinds of things, or does never disclose/declassify any of it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you mean the CIA does n't have manuals with those kinds of instructions , does n't do those kinds of things , or does never disclose/declassify any of it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you mean the CIA doesn't have manuals with those kinds of instructions, doesn't do those kinds of things, or does never disclose/declassify any of it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236258</id>
	<title>Oh, Look, the Kindle Version is Available!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259244960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how long until it gets globally deleted via the wireless updates.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how long until it gets globally deleted via the wireless updates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how long until it gets globally deleted via the wireless updates.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239958</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259232960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Valid insights, no doubt, but perhaps "Machiavellian" references started more akin to Orwellian references - something tells me George Orwell was no more an advocate of Big Brother than Machiavelli was of those things you say he opposed. Perhaps the meaning has been distorted from its origin, but that seems to be little different from just about anything else in this age of rampant ignorance...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Valid insights , no doubt , but perhaps " Machiavellian " references started more akin to Orwellian references - something tells me George Orwell was no more an advocate of Big Brother than Machiavelli was of those things you say he opposed .
Perhaps the meaning has been distorted from its origin , but that seems to be little different from just about anything else in this age of rampant ignorance.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Valid insights, no doubt, but perhaps "Machiavellian" references started more akin to Orwellian references - something tells me George Orwell was no more an advocate of Big Brother than Machiavelli was of those things you say he opposed.
Perhaps the meaning has been distorted from its origin, but that seems to be little different from just about anything else in this age of rampant ignorance...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30254054</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic</title>
	<author>Anne Honime</author>
	<datestamp>1259417520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So was Mendelssohn when he wrote his nuptial march, but it does little to avoid hearing it at most weddings, because many couples are not musicologist and have little choice over the matter. So it goes with our politicians : Machiavelli's original intents weight little in front of a wrong, centuries old, consensus.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So was Mendelssohn when he wrote his nuptial march , but it does little to avoid hearing it at most weddings , because many couples are not musicologist and have little choice over the matter .
So it goes with our politicians : Machiavelli 's original intents weight little in front of a wrong , centuries old , consensus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So was Mendelssohn when he wrote his nuptial march, but it does little to avoid hearing it at most weddings, because many couples are not musicologist and have little choice over the matter.
So it goes with our politicians : Machiavelli's original intents weight little in front of a wrong, centuries old, consensus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30240038</id>
	<title>Re:The original article?</title>
	<author>Lunzo</author>
	<datestamp>1259233560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So the Slashdot summary links to an article in the Huffington Post. And the HuffPo article links to an article in Wired. And the Wired article links to the actual story in the Boston Globe.</p></div> </blockquote><p>

I think there's less misdirection than usual. Normally<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. would link to some dude's blog which is calling another blog writer an idiot and happens to quote one line from the Huffington Post article. Once you eventually find the article it will be split over ten pages with one paragraph of text on each, surrounded by annoying flash ads.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So the Slashdot summary links to an article in the Huffington Post .
And the HuffPo article links to an article in Wired .
And the Wired article links to the actual story in the Boston Globe .
I think there 's less misdirection than usual .
Normally / .
would link to some dude 's blog which is calling another blog writer an idiot and happens to quote one line from the Huffington Post article .
Once you eventually find the article it will be split over ten pages with one paragraph of text on each , surrounded by annoying flash ads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the Slashdot summary links to an article in the Huffington Post.
And the HuffPo article links to an article in Wired.
And the Wired article links to the actual story in the Boston Globe.
I think there's less misdirection than usual.
Normally /.
would link to some dude's blog which is calling another blog writer an idiot and happens to quote one line from the Huffington Post article.
Once you eventually find the article it will be split over ten pages with one paragraph of text on each, surrounded by annoying flash ads.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236398</id>
	<title>Available at Barnes&amp;Noble as well</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259246280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh look, BN.com has it as well:  http://books.barnesandnoble.com/search/results.aspx?WRD=Official+CIA+Manual</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh look , BN.com has it as well : http : //books.barnesandnoble.com/search/results.aspx ? WRD = Official + CIA + Manual</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh look, BN.com has it as well:  http://books.barnesandnoble.com/search/results.aspx?WRD=Official+CIA+Manual</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239102</id>
	<title>Re:PDF Torrent?</title>
	<author>Rary</author>
	<datestamp>1259267820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One of the questions raised on the Amazon page is: shouldn't this material be public domain?</p></div><p>This is not the original manual. This is a book published by the people who found the manual. It includes the contents of the original manual, plus some additional commentary. It is, therefore, a new original work containing some possibly public domain material.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the questions raised on the Amazon page is : should n't this material be public domain ? This is not the original manual .
This is a book published by the people who found the manual .
It includes the contents of the original manual , plus some additional commentary .
It is , therefore , a new original work containing some possibly public domain material .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the questions raised on the Amazon page is: shouldn't this material be public domain?This is not the original manual.
This is a book published by the people who found the manual.
It includes the contents of the original manual, plus some additional commentary.
It is, therefore, a new original work containing some possibly public domain material.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236612</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1259248140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And every nation has one. Some are like the CIA suppose to spy on other nations. For the smaller nations, they spy on their own citizens.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And every nation has one .
Some are like the CIA suppose to spy on other nations .
For the smaller nations , they spy on their own citizens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And every nation has one.
Some are like the CIA suppose to spy on other nations.
For the smaller nations, they spy on their own citizens.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237638</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>Abreu</author>
	<datestamp>1259256240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you sure Machiavelli's concerns about mercenaries are obsolete?</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackwater\_Worldwide" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackwater\_Worldwide</a> [wikipedia.org]<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DynCorp" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DynCorp</a> [wikipedia.org]<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military\_Professional\_Resources\_Inc" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military\_Professional\_Resources\_Inc</a> [wikipedia.org].<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northbridge\_Services\_Group" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northbridge\_Services\_Group</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you sure Machiavelli 's concerns about mercenaries are obsolete ? http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackwater \ _Worldwide [ wikipedia.org ] http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DynCorp [ wikipedia.org ] http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military \ _Professional \ _Resources \ _Inc [ wikipedia.org ] .http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northbridge \ _Services \ _Group [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you sure Machiavelli's concerns about mercenaries are obsolete?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackwater\_Worldwide [wikipedia.org]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DynCorp [wikipedia.org]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military\_Professional\_Resources\_Inc [wikipedia.org].http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northbridge\_Services\_Group [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238566</id>
	<title>Bush and friends...</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1259263440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WMD etc...</p><p>I think they had a copy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WMD etc...I think they had a copy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WMD etc...I think they had a copy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236456</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236716</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on, everybody has that on his hard disk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259249040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Personally I found <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=tm+31-210" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">tm 31-210</a> [google.com] to be most interesting. Forget the Anarchist Cookbook, the USA Government itself provides the best manual to cook your own explosives. Only click the links at Google if you're not paranoid...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally I found tm 31-210 [ google.com ] to be most interesting .
Forget the Anarchist Cookbook , the USA Government itself provides the best manual to cook your own explosives .
Only click the links at Google if you 're not paranoid.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally I found tm 31-210 [google.com] to be most interesting.
Forget the Anarchist Cookbook, the USA Government itself provides the best manual to cook your own explosives.
Only click the links at Google if you're not paranoid...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30242772</id>
	<title>Re:The original article?</title>
	<author>st0nes</author>
	<datestamp>1259258880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OK, the Boston Globe has an illustration of the woman sawed in half trick.  I have wracked my brains, but cannot come up with any plausible scenario wherein the CIA would need to know how to do that.  If anyone has a more productive imagination, or was actually in the CIA, please let us know how this was used.</htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , the Boston Globe has an illustration of the woman sawed in half trick .
I have wracked my brains , but can not come up with any plausible scenario wherein the CIA would need to know how to do that .
If anyone has a more productive imagination , or was actually in the CIA , please let us know how this was used .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, the Boston Globe has an illustration of the woman sawed in half trick.
I have wracked my brains, but cannot come up with any plausible scenario wherein the CIA would need to know how to do that.
If anyone has a more productive imagination, or was actually in the CIA, please let us know how this was used.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236292</id>
	<title>PDF!!</title>
	<author>wirah</author>
	<datestamp>1259245200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Free download of the Ebook version or it never happened...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Free download of the Ebook version or it never happened.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free download of the Ebook version or it never happened...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239812</id>
	<title>Mentioning the obvious...</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1259231400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Contrary to what the summary implies, it's a reprint <em>based</em> on a surviving copy. The actual original from the seventies is going to fetch more than $20, and will probably not be available at Amazon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Contrary to what the summary implies , it 's a reprint based on a surviving copy .
The actual original from the seventies is going to fetch more than $ 20 , and will probably not be available at Amazon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Contrary to what the summary implies, it's a reprint based on a surviving copy.
The actual original from the seventies is going to fetch more than $20, and will probably not be available at Amazon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237988</id>
	<title>Re:hehehehe</title>
	<author>Omestes</author>
	<datestamp>1259258760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Now, if you are calling them criminal because of Iraq/Afghanistan, then nope. The real problem was not CIA. These were simply foot soldiers doing what they were ordered to by the highest level of the gov.</i></p><p>To risk a Godwin, "just following orders" hasn't been a valid defense (or, in this case moral rationalization) since Nuremberg.  Soldiers are just people, and people are culpable for their actions.  If someone works for a company, and that company asks them to do something illegal, whose to blame?  Both the company for asking illegal activities from its employees, and the employee for carrying out illegal activities.  Why should tacking the world "soldier" onto it make it any different?</p><p>If the people of the CIA broke international law, and acted in a way that is morally reprehensible to us, then guilt flows down the latter.  The US Gov't is guilty of making illegal demands, the CIA is guilty of not questioning these demands, and the employees of the CIA who actually carried this out are guilty of doing it (or at least not all turning into merry whistleblowers).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , if you are calling them criminal because of Iraq/Afghanistan , then nope .
The real problem was not CIA .
These were simply foot soldiers doing what they were ordered to by the highest level of the gov.To risk a Godwin , " just following orders " has n't been a valid defense ( or , in this case moral rationalization ) since Nuremberg .
Soldiers are just people , and people are culpable for their actions .
If someone works for a company , and that company asks them to do something illegal , whose to blame ?
Both the company for asking illegal activities from its employees , and the employee for carrying out illegal activities .
Why should tacking the world " soldier " onto it make it any different ? If the people of the CIA broke international law , and acted in a way that is morally reprehensible to us , then guilt flows down the latter .
The US Gov't is guilty of making illegal demands , the CIA is guilty of not questioning these demands , and the employees of the CIA who actually carried this out are guilty of doing it ( or at least not all turning into merry whistleblowers ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, if you are calling them criminal because of Iraq/Afghanistan, then nope.
The real problem was not CIA.
These were simply foot soldiers doing what they were ordered to by the highest level of the gov.To risk a Godwin, "just following orders" hasn't been a valid defense (or, in this case moral rationalization) since Nuremberg.
Soldiers are just people, and people are culpable for their actions.
If someone works for a company, and that company asks them to do something illegal, whose to blame?
Both the company for asking illegal activities from its employees, and the employee for carrying out illegal activities.
Why should tacking the world "soldier" onto it make it any different?If the people of the CIA broke international law, and acted in a way that is morally reprehensible to us, then guilt flows down the latter.
The US Gov't is guilty of making illegal demands, the CIA is guilty of not questioning these demands, and the employees of the CIA who actually carried this out are guilty of doing it (or at least not all turning into merry whistleblowers).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237540</id>
	<title>Re:PDF Torrent?</title>
	<author>Urza9814</author>
	<datestamp>1259255340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>any copyright would seem to have expired at this point,</p></div><p>There's shit from the 30s still under copyright. No way in hell is a book from the 70s going to be out of copyright yet...as retarded as that is...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>any copyright would seem to have expired at this point,There 's shit from the 30s still under copyright .
No way in hell is a book from the 70s going to be out of copyright yet...as retarded as that is.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>any copyright would seem to have expired at this point,There's shit from the 30s still under copyright.
No way in hell is a book from the 70s going to be out of copyright yet...as retarded as that is...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236340</id>
	<title>Re:The original article?</title>
	<author>lxs</author>
	<datestamp>1259245620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Meh that's so 1994. This is the new<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/ inspired internet where links are linking links that link links. There isn't even a story or a book. It's all links.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Meh that 's so 1994 .
This is the new /b/ inspired internet where links are linking links that link links .
There is n't even a story or a book .
It 's all links .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meh that's so 1994.
This is the new /b/ inspired internet where links are linking links that link links.
There isn't even a story or a book.
It's all links.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238884</id>
	<title>Re:Trickery and misdirection</title>
	<author>Peaceful\_Patriot</author>
	<datestamp>1259265840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"22 new from $14.41 / 4 used from $15.39"
<br> <br>
Ok..if only 1 survived, how come there are 4 used copies available on Amazon?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" 22 new from $ 14.41 / 4 used from $ 15.39 " Ok..if only 1 survived , how come there are 4 used copies available on Amazon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"22 new from $14.41 / 4 used from $15.39"
 
Ok..if only 1 survived, how come there are 4 used copies available on Amazon?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237054</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>khallow</author>
	<datestamp>1259251500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So what? "The Prince" is overrated as a manual for ruling people. It's real charm is simply that it doesn't cater to the more common hypocrisies. But the advice just isn't that useful IMHO. My view is that the book was intended as a rationalization of contemporary power gathering and leadership approaches than a "how to" book. "The Art of War" would be more effective a tool since among things, that book gives actual examples of how to lead and it presents a number of useful insights into conflict and strategy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what ?
" The Prince " is overrated as a manual for ruling people .
It 's real charm is simply that it does n't cater to the more common hypocrisies .
But the advice just is n't that useful IMHO .
My view is that the book was intended as a rationalization of contemporary power gathering and leadership approaches than a " how to " book .
" The Art of War " would be more effective a tool since among things , that book gives actual examples of how to lead and it presents a number of useful insights into conflict and strategy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what?
"The Prince" is overrated as a manual for ruling people.
It's real charm is simply that it doesn't cater to the more common hypocrisies.
But the advice just isn't that useful IMHO.
My view is that the book was intended as a rationalization of contemporary power gathering and leadership approaches than a "how to" book.
"The Art of War" would be more effective a tool since among things, that book gives actual examples of how to lead and it presents a number of useful insights into conflict and strategy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236986</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>VoidEngineer</author>
	<datestamp>1259251020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can assure you that Machiavelli's Discourses on Levi's History of Ancient Rome are a far better account of how to run a republic.  All of Obama's actions so far indicate that he's taking his advice from the Discourses, not the Prince.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can assure you that Machiavelli 's Discourses on Levi 's History of Ancient Rome are a far better account of how to run a republic .
All of Obama 's actions so far indicate that he 's taking his advice from the Discourses , not the Prince .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can assure you that Machiavelli's Discourses on Levi's History of Ancient Rome are a far better account of how to run a republic.
All of Obama's actions so far indicate that he's taking his advice from the Discourses, not the Prince.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239414</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259227740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"the strong do what they have the power to do and the weak accept what they have to accept"</p><p>"The only usage of the term "good" that you can probably use in this scenario is that the actions taken continue the existence of the state."</p><p>That's the usage for the strong, but the concept of good and evil that the weak have is different than that of the strong: it involves morality.</p><p>"Those who are fit to rule are those who realize there is no morality and that there is only one natural right, the right of the superior to rule over the inferior".<br>- Leo Strauss</p><p>If professional criminals would have a philosophy, that would be it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" the strong do what they have the power to do and the weak accept what they have to accept " " The only usage of the term " good " that you can probably use in this scenario is that the actions taken continue the existence of the state .
" That 's the usage for the strong , but the concept of good and evil that the weak have is different than that of the strong : it involves morality .
" Those who are fit to rule are those who realize there is no morality and that there is only one natural right , the right of the superior to rule over the inferior " .- Leo StraussIf professional criminals would have a philosophy , that would be it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"the strong do what they have the power to do and the weak accept what they have to accept""The only usage of the term "good" that you can probably use in this scenario is that the actions taken continue the existence of the state.
"That's the usage for the strong, but the concept of good and evil that the weak have is different than that of the strong: it involves morality.
"Those who are fit to rule are those who realize there is no morality and that there is only one natural right, the right of the superior to rule over the inferior".- Leo StraussIf professional criminals would have a philosophy, that would be it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236830</id>
	<title>Re:The original article?</title>
	<author>microcars</author>
	<datestamp>1259250000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>it is called Lubrication.  Internet does not work without it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>it is called Lubrication .
Internet does not work without it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it is called Lubrication.
Internet does not work without it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236666</id>
	<title>hehehehe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259248500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Every nation has a CIA equivalence. They have to. They have to know what others are doing and if there is a real threat.  For example MI6 comes to mind.<br> <br>
Now, if you are calling them criminal because of Iraq/Afghanistan, then nope. The real problem was not CIA. These were simply foot soldiers  doing what they were ordered to by the highest level of the gov.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Every nation has a CIA equivalence .
They have to .
They have to know what others are doing and if there is a real threat .
For example MI6 comes to mind .
Now , if you are calling them criminal because of Iraq/Afghanistan , then nope .
The real problem was not CIA .
These were simply foot soldiers doing what they were ordered to by the highest level of the gov .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every nation has a CIA equivalence.
They have to.
They have to know what others are doing and if there is a real threat.
For example MI6 comes to mind.
Now, if you are calling them criminal because of Iraq/Afghanistan, then nope.
The real problem was not CIA.
These were simply foot soldiers  doing what they were ordered to by the highest level of the gov.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239404</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on, everybody has that on his hard disk</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1259227560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So BBS users wrote CIA and army manuals?  What?  These aren't anarchy philes we're talking about here.  They have <a href="http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/policy/army/fm/fm34-52/chapter1.htm" title="globalsecurity.org"> and ordinary people are often shocked to find that Army manuals tell you how to kill people.  "I read it, and those methods are so unfair!  We are such horrible people!"  I mean, you and I know that's a ridiculous attitude, but I'm not kidding when I tell you there are people out there who do have those reactions.</a> [globalsecurity.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>So BBS users wrote CIA and army manuals ?
What ? These are n't anarchy philes we 're talking about here .
They have and ordinary people are often shocked to find that Army manuals tell you how to kill people .
" I read it , and those methods are so unfair !
We are such horrible people !
" I mean , you and I know that 's a ridiculous attitude , but I 'm not kidding when I tell you there are people out there who do have those reactions .
[ globalsecurity.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So BBS users wrote CIA and army manuals?
What?  These aren't anarchy philes we're talking about here.
They have  and ordinary people are often shocked to find that Army manuals tell you how to kill people.
"I read it, and those methods are so unfair!
We are such horrible people!
"  I mean, you and I know that's a ridiculous attitude, but I'm not kidding when I tell you there are people out there who do have those reactions.
[globalsecurity.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236456</id>
	<title>A few excerpts.</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1259246760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Chapter One: Misdirection<br>Let me preface this with a few words <b>WHOA LOOK BEHIND YOU MAN!</b> Did you look? I knew it! There you go. Misdirection.<br> <br>Chapter 2: Concealment: <br>Watch Pulp Fiction. Captain Koons talking to Butch about his grandpa's wristwatch is all you need know.<br> <br>Chapter 3: Stagecraft.<br>See Chapter One. Do something while they're not looking. If someone looks while you're doing whatever it is you're doing, kill them. Claim they were terrorists.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chapter One : MisdirectionLet me preface this with a few words WHOA LOOK BEHIND YOU MAN !
Did you look ?
I knew it !
There you go .
Misdirection. Chapter 2 : Concealment : Watch Pulp Fiction .
Captain Koons talking to Butch about his grandpa 's wristwatch is all you need know .
Chapter 3 : Stagecraft.See Chapter One .
Do something while they 're not looking .
If someone looks while you 're doing whatever it is you 're doing , kill them .
Claim they were terrorists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chapter One: MisdirectionLet me preface this with a few words WHOA LOOK BEHIND YOU MAN!
Did you look?
I knew it!
There you go.
Misdirection. Chapter 2: Concealment: Watch Pulp Fiction.
Captain Koons talking to Butch about his grandpa's wristwatch is all you need know.
Chapter 3: Stagecraft.See Chapter One.
Do something while they're not looking.
If someone looks while you're doing whatever it is you're doing, kill them.
Claim they were terrorists.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237510</id>
	<title>question</title>
	<author>anonymous9991</author>
	<datestamp>1259254980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am confused as to how google and amazon got rights to all these books. Doesn't this violate copyright laws. If I create a book will google and amazon get it without my knowledge.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am confused as to how google and amazon got rights to all these books .
Does n't this violate copyright laws .
If I create a book will google and amazon get it without my knowledge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am confused as to how google and amazon got rights to all these books.
Doesn't this violate copyright laws.
If I create a book will google and amazon get it without my knowledge.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238214</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>BrokenHalo</author>
	<datestamp>1259260560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book. </i> <br> <br>
Not sure about that. Most of the available evidence suggests that the last president of the US couldn't read at all.<br> <br>
This ignorance, fortunately, hasn't been universal among US presidents. After all, Herbert Hoover did an excellent job of translating Agricola's "<i>De Re Metallica</i>" from Latin into English.</htmltext>
<tokenext>every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book .
Not sure about that .
Most of the available evidence suggests that the last president of the US could n't read at all .
This ignorance , fortunately , has n't been universal among US presidents .
After all , Herbert Hoover did an excellent job of translating Agricola 's " De Re Metallica " from Latin into English .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>every single president in the US or leader elsewhere has read that book.
Not sure about that.
Most of the available evidence suggests that the last president of the US couldn't read at all.
This ignorance, fortunately, hasn't been universal among US presidents.
After all, Herbert Hoover did an excellent job of translating Agricola's "De Re Metallica" from Latin into English.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236792</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>krou</author>
	<datestamp>1259249700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"As they are tools they can be used for both Good and Evil purposes."</p></div></blockquote><p>I know what you mean, but that's the wrong terminology to be using when discussing Machiavelli and the school of realism (which is essentially what you're describing). It's nothing to do with "good" and "evil". It's only about power, and continuing the existence of the state by whatever means necessary. This tradition goes all the way back to Thucydides, who basically recorded that the &ldquo;the strong do what they have the power to do and the weak accept what they have to accept [and] by conquering you we shall increase not only the size but the security of our empire &ndash; it is a general and necessary law of nature to rule whatever one can". Rousseau, Niebuhr, Edward Bernays, and various others all expound the same principles.</p><p>The only usage of the term "good" that you can probably use in this scenario is that the actions taken continue the existence of the state. Machiavelli even notes that "it is necessary for a prince wishing to hold his own to know how to do wrong, and to make use of it or not according to necessity &ndash; it will be found that something which looks like virtue, if followed, would be his ruin; whilst something else, which looks like vice, yet followed brings him security and prosperity.&rdquo; "Good" and "evil" simply do not apply as most people would understand them; that's a moral code used for propaganda i.e. whatever we do is "good", while whatever they do is "evil". Lying, deception, torture, wars of aggression, ignoring human rights issues, etc. are not things that most people would endorse as being "good" in any shape or form, but in the realm of realism they are all legitimate means towards the one goal i.e. continuing the existence of the state.</p><p>This is one of the prime reasons that there exists a core contradiction in states: internally, its citizens are meant to uphold a strict moral code. Externally, as a collective, they engage in activities that very rarely, if ever, coincide with this moral code.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" As they are tools they can be used for both Good and Evil purposes .
" I know what you mean , but that 's the wrong terminology to be using when discussing Machiavelli and the school of realism ( which is essentially what you 're describing ) .
It 's nothing to do with " good " and " evil " .
It 's only about power , and continuing the existence of the state by whatever means necessary .
This tradition goes all the way back to Thucydides , who basically recorded that the    the strong do what they have the power to do and the weak accept what they have to accept [ and ] by conquering you we shall increase not only the size but the security of our empire    it is a general and necessary law of nature to rule whatever one can " .
Rousseau , Niebuhr , Edward Bernays , and various others all expound the same principles.The only usage of the term " good " that you can probably use in this scenario is that the actions taken continue the existence of the state .
Machiavelli even notes that " it is necessary for a prince wishing to hold his own to know how to do wrong , and to make use of it or not according to necessity    it will be found that something which looks like virtue , if followed , would be his ruin ; whilst something else , which looks like vice , yet followed brings him security and prosperity.    " Good " and " evil " simply do not apply as most people would understand them ; that 's a moral code used for propaganda i.e .
whatever we do is " good " , while whatever they do is " evil " .
Lying , deception , torture , wars of aggression , ignoring human rights issues , etc .
are not things that most people would endorse as being " good " in any shape or form , but in the realm of realism they are all legitimate means towards the one goal i.e .
continuing the existence of the state.This is one of the prime reasons that there exists a core contradiction in states : internally , its citizens are meant to uphold a strict moral code .
Externally , as a collective , they engage in activities that very rarely , if ever , coincide with this moral code .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"As they are tools they can be used for both Good and Evil purposes.
"I know what you mean, but that's the wrong terminology to be using when discussing Machiavelli and the school of realism (which is essentially what you're describing).
It's nothing to do with "good" and "evil".
It's only about power, and continuing the existence of the state by whatever means necessary.
This tradition goes all the way back to Thucydides, who basically recorded that the “the strong do what they have the power to do and the weak accept what they have to accept [and] by conquering you we shall increase not only the size but the security of our empire – it is a general and necessary law of nature to rule whatever one can".
Rousseau, Niebuhr, Edward Bernays, and various others all expound the same principles.The only usage of the term "good" that you can probably use in this scenario is that the actions taken continue the existence of the state.
Machiavelli even notes that "it is necessary for a prince wishing to hold his own to know how to do wrong, and to make use of it or not according to necessity – it will be found that something which looks like virtue, if followed, would be his ruin; whilst something else, which looks like vice, yet followed brings him security and prosperity.” "Good" and "evil" simply do not apply as most people would understand them; that's a moral code used for propaganda i.e.
whatever we do is "good", while whatever they do is "evil".
Lying, deception, torture, wars of aggression, ignoring human rights issues, etc.
are not things that most people would endorse as being "good" in any shape or form, but in the realm of realism they are all legitimate means towards the one goal i.e.
continuing the existence of the state.This is one of the prime reasons that there exists a core contradiction in states: internally, its citizens are meant to uphold a strict moral code.
Externally, as a collective, they engage in activities that very rarely, if ever, coincide with this moral code.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30243220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30242772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238510
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30240038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30241378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30244082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236456
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238902
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30254054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30242596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30249420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30317534
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30252114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_0316257_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_0316257.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236236
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_0316257.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236602
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_0316257.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_0316257.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236534
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236506
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_0316257.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236296
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236568
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237772
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237540
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237786
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237130
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_0316257.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236340
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30243220
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30240038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30242772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237164
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_0316257.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238566
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_0316257.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236482
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237462
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30317534
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236980
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237360
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238902
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30241378
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239562
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237524
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237098
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239958
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30252114
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237920
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30254054
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238340
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236986
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237200
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236726
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237106
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237732
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237638
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237596
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237054
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237132
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237820
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236792
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237822
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239414
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238818
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239820
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238510
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237572
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30244082
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237118
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236684
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30249420
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236880
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236666
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237988
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_0316257.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238884
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_0316257.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237510
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_0316257.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236352
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236594
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30237212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30242596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30238084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236452
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239404
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30239160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_0316257.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30278664
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_0316257.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236560
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_0316257.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_0316257.30236382
</commentlist>
</conversation>
