<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_25_2132204</id>
	<title>KDE Rebrands, Introduces KDE Plasma Desktop</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1259143140000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Jiilik Oiolosse writes <i>"The KDE community has <a href="http://dot.kde.org/2009/11/24/repositioning-kde-brand">killed the term K Desktop Environment</a> (previously the Kool Desktop Environment). 'KDE' had previously ambiguously referred to both the community, and the complete set of programs and tools produced by the KDE community which together formed a desktop user interface. This set of tools, including the window manager, panels and configuration utilities, which KDE terms a 'workspace,' will now be shipped under the term 'KDE Plasma Desktop.' This allows KDE to ship a separate workspace called 'Plasma Netbook,' and independently market the various KDE applications as usable in any workspace, whether it be the Plasma Desktop, Windows, or XFCE."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jiilik Oiolosse writes " The KDE community has killed the term K Desktop Environment ( previously the Kool Desktop Environment ) .
'KDE ' had previously ambiguously referred to both the community , and the complete set of programs and tools produced by the KDE community which together formed a desktop user interface .
This set of tools , including the window manager , panels and configuration utilities , which KDE terms a 'workspace, ' will now be shipped under the term 'KDE Plasma Desktop .
' This allows KDE to ship a separate workspace called 'Plasma Netbook, ' and independently market the various KDE applications as usable in any workspace , whether it be the Plasma Desktop , Windows , or XFCE .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jiilik Oiolosse writes "The KDE community has killed the term K Desktop Environment (previously the Kool Desktop Environment).
'KDE' had previously ambiguously referred to both the community, and the complete set of programs and tools produced by the KDE community which together formed a desktop user interface.
This set of tools, including the window manager, panels and configuration utilities, which KDE terms a 'workspace,' will now be shipped under the term 'KDE Plasma Desktop.
' This allows KDE to ship a separate workspace called 'Plasma Netbook,' and independently market the various KDE applications as usable in any workspace, whether it be the Plasma Desktop, Windows, or XFCE.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231422</id>
	<title>Re:Clarity?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257162240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think you mean the KDE Klari.... wait, never mind.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you mean the KDE Klari.... wait , never mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you mean the KDE Klari.... wait, never mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232162</id>
	<title>Re:Wrods for mare mortals</title>
	<author>Bucc5062</author>
	<datestamp>1257168240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I pondered your title for a moment.  Was this an old english spelling test?  Wrods coming from a Celtic derivation of the word Words?  I realize you were trying to include the equine species in your comments and I thank you from my mare.  She gets very confused over wrods or Words.  As a German Trakhener, she is partial to SUSE and would rather Linux get away from the US centric orientation of Kubuntu.</p><p>Alas, her hooves are not quite capable of operating a keyboard so she has to rely on my fingers, which are squarely comfortable with Gnome and the Mint distros, for her Google searches on hot stallions, joint supplements, and Eventing results.  Wrods or Words, Mares rule the fields against us mere mortals.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I pondered your title for a moment .
Was this an old english spelling test ?
Wrods coming from a Celtic derivation of the word Words ?
I realize you were trying to include the equine species in your comments and I thank you from my mare .
She gets very confused over wrods or Words .
As a German Trakhener , she is partial to SUSE and would rather Linux get away from the US centric orientation of Kubuntu.Alas , her hooves are not quite capable of operating a keyboard so she has to rely on my fingers , which are squarely comfortable with Gnome and the Mint distros , for her Google searches on hot stallions , joint supplements , and Eventing results .
Wrods or Words , Mares rule the fields against us mere mortals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I pondered your title for a moment.
Was this an old english spelling test?
Wrods coming from a Celtic derivation of the word Words?
I realize you were trying to include the equine species in your comments and I thank you from my mare.
She gets very confused over wrods or Words.
As a German Trakhener, she is partial to SUSE and would rather Linux get away from the US centric orientation of Kubuntu.Alas, her hooves are not quite capable of operating a keyboard so she has to rely on my fingers, which are squarely comfortable with Gnome and the Mint distros, for her Google searches on hot stallions, joint supplements, and Eventing results.
Wrods or Words, Mares rule the fields against us mere mortals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231436</id>
	<title>Re:Clarity?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257162240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Thanks, <em>Klarity Kommittee!</em> </p></div><p>Tharity Thommittee!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks , Klarity Kommittee !
Tharity Thommittee !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks, Klarity Kommittee!
Tharity Thommittee!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231294</id>
	<title>Gibberish</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257161520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are only two appropriate responses to that summary:</p><p>- huh?<br>- wut?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are only two appropriate responses to that summary : - huh ? - wut ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are only two appropriate responses to that summary:- huh?- wut?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232346</id>
	<title>Re:sounds exiting</title>
	<author>Randle\_Revar</author>
	<datestamp>1257169320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, actually:<br><a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/reviews/2009/08/hands-on-kde-43-delivers-a-social-desktop.ars" title="arstechnica.com">http://arstechnica.com/open-source/reviews/2009/08/hands-on-kde-43-delivers-a-social-desktop.ars</a> [arstechnica.com]<br><a href="http://www.kdenews.org/2009/10/09/social-desktop-winners" title="kdenews.org">http://www.kdenews.org/2009/10/09/social-desktop-winners</a> [kdenews.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , actually : http : //arstechnica.com/open-source/reviews/2009/08/hands-on-kde-43-delivers-a-social-desktop.ars [ arstechnica.com ] http : //www.kdenews.org/2009/10/09/social-desktop-winners [ kdenews.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, actually:http://arstechnica.com/open-source/reviews/2009/08/hands-on-kde-43-delivers-a-social-desktop.ars [arstechnica.com]http://www.kdenews.org/2009/10/09/social-desktop-winners [kdenews.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232210</id>
	<title>Re:sounds exiting</title>
	<author>V!NCENT</author>
	<datestamp>1257168480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235478</id>
	<title>KDE Plasma Desktop</title>
	<author>MadJo</author>
	<datestamp>1259235660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, it would be the Kool Desktop Environment Plasma Desktop.<br>Thank you department of redundancy department.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , it would be the Kool Desktop Environment Plasma Desktop.Thank you department of redundancy department .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, it would be the Kool Desktop Environment Plasma Desktop.Thank you department of redundancy department.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233926</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>Qu4Z</author>
	<datestamp>1257184560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That won't be confusing.</p><p>I say that as a KDE Software Compilation user.</p></div><p>FTFY</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That wo n't be confusing.I say that as a KDE Software Compilation user.FTFY</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That won't be confusing.I say that as a KDE Software Compilation user.FTFY
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231128</id>
	<title>The New KDE!</title>
	<author>boudie2</author>
	<datestamp>1257160260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The new KDE makes your whites whiter and your brights brighter.
They've lost direction.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The new KDE makes your whites whiter and your brights brighter .
They 've lost direction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The new KDE makes your whites whiter and your brights brighter.
They've lost direction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231074</id>
	<title>the triumph of buzzwords!</title>
	<author>plasmacutter</author>
	<datestamp>1257159720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>just add "HD" "Plasma" "Giga-" or some other pseudo-scifi or pseudo-consumer-tech jargon to ANYTHING and suddenly it's 'cool'!.</p><p>I think i know where the people responsible for "SYFY" are spending their spare time.</p><p>quick everyone, pass the "plasma" shake-weights!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>just add " HD " " Plasma " " Giga- " or some other pseudo-scifi or pseudo-consumer-tech jargon to ANYTHING and suddenly it 's 'cool ' ! .I think i know where the people responsible for " SYFY " are spending their spare time.quick everyone , pass the " plasma " shake-weights !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just add "HD" "Plasma" "Giga-" or some other pseudo-scifi or pseudo-consumer-tech jargon to ANYTHING and suddenly it's 'cool'!.I think i know where the people responsible for "SYFY" are spending their spare time.quick everyone, pass the "plasma" shake-weights!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234930</id>
	<title>Re:The sweet stink of rebranding!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259229540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot the best of them all:<br>Borland -&gt; Inprise -&gt; Borland</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot the best of them all : Borland - &gt; Inprise - &gt; Borland</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot the best of them all:Borland -&gt; Inprise -&gt; Borland</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235220</id>
	<title>Re:Wrods for mare mortals</title>
	<author>AniVisual</author>
	<datestamp>1259232780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then lets' port it to KPD and call it the KIMP! </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then lets ' port it to KPD and call it the KIMP !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then lets' port it to KPD and call it the KIMP! </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233376</id>
	<title>Re:SYNERGY!</title>
	<author>ArcherB</author>
	<datestamp>1257177900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No they don't, you can install the synergy package yourself.</p></div><p>sudo apt-get install synergy</p><p>Of course, you need the right repo's.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No they do n't , you can install the synergy package yourself.sudo apt-get install synergyOf course , you need the right repo 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No they don't, you can install the synergy package yourself.sudo apt-get install synergyOf course, you need the right repo's.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232512</id>
	<title>Re:Wrods for mare mortals</title>
	<author>lennier</author>
	<datestamp>1257170520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"How in the world does one lauch a Word?"</p><p>Well, you poit your moue curor at the ion and cick the buton...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" How in the world does one lauch a Word ?
" Well , you poit your moue curor at the ion and cick the buton.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How in the world does one lauch a Word?
"Well, you poit your moue curor at the ion and cick the buton...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232246</id>
	<title>Kool Desktop Environment?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257168720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>um ok so if KDE no longer means "Kool Desktop Environment" (whatever that is supposed to mean), then why even call anything about your project KDE? From TFA: "KDE is no longer software created by people, but people who create software" so why not call your group something sensible like, say, Sensible? If the initials don't stand for any words, why use them?  I suppose if you really want to keep the K-ness of your software you might call yourselves simply Komplete? I don't think you could get away with Kool or Krafty due to pesky trademark laws...  if you don't figure out something soon, your would-be supporters might simply accuse KDE of being Konflated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>um ok so if KDE no longer means " Kool Desktop Environment " ( whatever that is supposed to mean ) , then why even call anything about your project KDE ?
From TFA : " KDE is no longer software created by people , but people who create software " so why not call your group something sensible like , say , Sensible ?
If the initials do n't stand for any words , why use them ?
I suppose if you really want to keep the K-ness of your software you might call yourselves simply Komplete ?
I do n't think you could get away with Kool or Krafty due to pesky trademark laws... if you do n't figure out something soon , your would-be supporters might simply accuse KDE of being Konflated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>um ok so if KDE no longer means "Kool Desktop Environment" (whatever that is supposed to mean), then why even call anything about your project KDE?
From TFA: "KDE is no longer software created by people, but people who create software" so why not call your group something sensible like, say, Sensible?
If the initials don't stand for any words, why use them?
I suppose if you really want to keep the K-ness of your software you might call yourselves simply Komplete?
I don't think you could get away with Kool or Krafty due to pesky trademark laws...  if you don't figure out something soon, your would-be supporters might simply accuse KDE of being Konflated.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231908</id>
	<title>Re:SYNERGY!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257166260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your mom add synergy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your mom add synergy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your mom add synergy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235788</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>Zero\_\_Kelvin</author>
	<datestamp>1259239020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"That won't be confusing.<br>I say that as a KDE user.</p></div></blockquote><p>If you find that confusing (and you are the first person I have ever said this to, and probably the last too):<br> <br> You might want to consider switching to Gnome.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" That wo n't be confusing.I say that as a KDE user.If you find that confusing ( and you are the first person I have ever said this to , and probably the last too ) : You might want to consider switching to Gnome .
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"That won't be confusing.I say that as a KDE user.If you find that confusing (and you are the first person I have ever said this to, and probably the last too):  You might want to consider switching to Gnome.
;-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235684</id>
	<title>Nasaly fitted fire?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259237940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure.  But how did this KDE change get past the committees and focus groups?<br>Hopefully they will change enough of the namespace, so 3.5 can coexist.<br>I'm tempted to move back to Enlightenment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure .
But how did this KDE change get past the committees and focus groups ? Hopefully they will change enough of the namespace , so 3.5 can coexist.I 'm tempted to move back to Enlightenment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure.
But how did this KDE change get past the committees and focus groups?Hopefully they will change enough of the namespace, so 3.5 can coexist.I'm tempted to move back to Enlightenment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231640</id>
	<title>Re:Waste of time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257163800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes because the KDE people can only do one thing at a time and stopped writing software while other people did naming and branding.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes because the KDE people can only do one thing at a time and stopped writing software while other people did naming and branding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes because the KDE people can only do one thing at a time and stopped writing software while other people did naming and branding.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235428</id>
	<title>Re:Wrods for mare mortals</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259235120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've got news for you - to the majority of people "gimp" is just another meaningless word like "windows" or "apple". Hint: most people don't speak English.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got news for you - to the majority of people " gimp " is just another meaningless word like " windows " or " apple " .
Hint : most people do n't speak English .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got news for you - to the majority of people "gimp" is just another meaningless word like "windows" or "apple".
Hint: most people don't speak English.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30236030</id>
	<title>Doesn't emphasize the bloat factor well enough</title>
	<author>exa</author>
	<datestamp>1259242320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As an inactive KDE developer, may I suggest that we name it KDE Bloatspace Desktop and KDE Bloatspace Netbook?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As an inactive KDE developer , may I suggest that we name it KDE Bloatspace Desktop and KDE Bloatspace Netbook ?
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an inactive KDE developer, may I suggest that we name it KDE Bloatspace Desktop and KDE Bloatspace Netbook?
:D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30240926</id>
	<title>Re:"Plasma Netbook" is the right approach IMO</title>
	<author>renoX</author>
	<datestamp>1259240520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Smart design?<br>I've heard that everything is in the same process so if one widget fail it can crash the desktop, I don't think that's an improvement over the previous sturdy design 'one process per tool'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Smart design ? I 've heard that everything is in the same process so if one widget fail it can crash the desktop , I do n't think that 's an improvement over the previous sturdy design 'one process per tool' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Smart design?I've heard that everything is in the same process so if one widget fail it can crash the desktop, I don't think that's an improvement over the previous sturdy design 'one process per tool'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30244276</id>
	<title>Re:3.5</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259323020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You obviously have not used kde 4.3. I jumped onto the bandwagon with 4.3 and while a handful of programs is not 100\% there where it was before, the desktop itself is amazing and very good.<br>Crying for 3.5 is pointless especialls since you can use the programs parallely just like it was between 1.x and 2.x.<br>Kde 4 has become amazing, while the 4.0 and 4.1 releases according to the comments on the net were not good it has matured and is perfectly usable and an amazing DE by now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You obviously have not used kde 4.3 .
I jumped onto the bandwagon with 4.3 and while a handful of programs is not 100 \ % there where it was before , the desktop itself is amazing and very good.Crying for 3.5 is pointless especialls since you can use the programs parallely just like it was between 1.x and 2.x.Kde 4 has become amazing , while the 4.0 and 4.1 releases according to the comments on the net were not good it has matured and is perfectly usable and an amazing DE by now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You obviously have not used kde 4.3.
I jumped onto the bandwagon with 4.3 and while a handful of programs is not 100\% there where it was before, the desktop itself is amazing and very good.Crying for 3.5 is pointless especialls since you can use the programs parallely just like it was between 1.x and 2.x.Kde 4 has become amazing, while the 4.0 and 4.1 releases according to the comments on the net were not good it has matured and is perfectly usable and an amazing DE by now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231072</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257159720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>That won't be confusing.<br>
I say that as a KDE user.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That wo n't be confusing .
I say that as a KDE user .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That won't be confusing.
I say that as a KDE user.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231536</id>
	<title>Re:sounds exiting</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1257162840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, but only in the verticals of the cloud and similar cyber-chunnels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but only in the verticals of the cloud and similar cyber-chunnels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but only in the verticals of the cloud and similar cyber-chunnels.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30236350</id>
	<title>Re:The sweet stink of rebranding!</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1259245680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What? Windows 7 Alpaca Fetish Edition is a great edition.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What ?
Windows 7 Alpaca Fetish Edition is a great edition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?
Windows 7 Alpaca Fetish Edition is a great edition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233088</id>
	<title>Easy Way</title>
	<author>rehtlog</author>
	<datestamp>1257175140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>An easy way to make Linux mainstream is sell computers without an OS and ask the typical layman if they would like to spend $200+ on windows or some variant of Linux for free.  I am almost certain many of them would be willing to learn a new OS.</htmltext>
<tokenext>An easy way to make Linux mainstream is sell computers without an OS and ask the typical layman if they would like to spend $ 200 + on windows or some variant of Linux for free .
I am almost certain many of them would be willing to learn a new OS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An easy way to make Linux mainstream is sell computers without an OS and ask the typical layman if they would like to spend $200+ on windows or some variant of Linux for free.
I am almost certain many of them would be willing to learn a new OS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232650</id>
	<title>The future of KDE bug reports: Some sample replies</title>
	<author>clemenstimpler</author>
	<datestamp>1257171720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <b>Step 1:</b> "The KDE software compilation team happily acknowledges the bug report you have filed. Why we are happy? This bug report in fact concerns the KDE workspaces team. Or so we believe. Please be so kind as to file your bug report again at the appropriate place. If the KDE workplaces team should be able to <i>prove</i> that this is none of their matter, please be so kind as to reopen this bug. After reopening the bug here, please be aware that it will be triaged for at least nine months as a matter of policy. If you should be obnoxious, we may decide at our own will to extend the period to at least eleven months. Thank you very much for your assistance in making the K Desktop/Compilation/Workspace/Application Experience even better. Salvatory Clause: The expression "K Desktop experience" is only preserved for the purpose of backward compatibility."</p><p> <b>Step 2:</b> "Thanks a lot for filing a bug report. We certainly appreciate your willingness to enhance the K Workspaces Experience (formerly known as the K Desktop Experience, an expression preserved only in order to preserve backward compatibility). However, we have noticed in your bug report that Amarok 1.1.4 has been opened while encountering your bug. Since Amarok 1.1.4 certainly cannot be regarded as part of the K Software Compilation experience, you should consider updating. If this does not remove the bug you have encountered, please be so kind as to file a bug first against the respective K Software Compilation. If this should not prove to be sucessful in the next two years, please reconsider opening the bug here. Before that, it will be futile anyway."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Step 1 : " The KDE software compilation team happily acknowledges the bug report you have filed .
Why we are happy ?
This bug report in fact concerns the KDE workspaces team .
Or so we believe .
Please be so kind as to file your bug report again at the appropriate place .
If the KDE workplaces team should be able to prove that this is none of their matter , please be so kind as to reopen this bug .
After reopening the bug here , please be aware that it will be triaged for at least nine months as a matter of policy .
If you should be obnoxious , we may decide at our own will to extend the period to at least eleven months .
Thank you very much for your assistance in making the K Desktop/Compilation/Workspace/Application Experience even better .
Salvatory Clause : The expression " K Desktop experience " is only preserved for the purpose of backward compatibility .
" Step 2 : " Thanks a lot for filing a bug report .
We certainly appreciate your willingness to enhance the K Workspaces Experience ( formerly known as the K Desktop Experience , an expression preserved only in order to preserve backward compatibility ) .
However , we have noticed in your bug report that Amarok 1.1.4 has been opened while encountering your bug .
Since Amarok 1.1.4 certainly can not be regarded as part of the K Software Compilation experience , you should consider updating .
If this does not remove the bug you have encountered , please be so kind as to file a bug first against the respective K Software Compilation .
If this should not prove to be sucessful in the next two years , please reconsider opening the bug here .
Before that , it will be futile anyway .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Step 1: "The KDE software compilation team happily acknowledges the bug report you have filed.
Why we are happy?
This bug report in fact concerns the KDE workspaces team.
Or so we believe.
Please be so kind as to file your bug report again at the appropriate place.
If the KDE workplaces team should be able to prove that this is none of their matter, please be so kind as to reopen this bug.
After reopening the bug here, please be aware that it will be triaged for at least nine months as a matter of policy.
If you should be obnoxious, we may decide at our own will to extend the period to at least eleven months.
Thank you very much for your assistance in making the K Desktop/Compilation/Workspace/Application Experience even better.
Salvatory Clause: The expression "K Desktop experience" is only preserved for the purpose of backward compatibility.
" Step 2: "Thanks a lot for filing a bug report.
We certainly appreciate your willingness to enhance the K Workspaces Experience (formerly known as the K Desktop Experience, an expression preserved only in order to preserve backward compatibility).
However, we have noticed in your bug report that Amarok 1.1.4 has been opened while encountering your bug.
Since Amarok 1.1.4 certainly cannot be regarded as part of the K Software Compilation experience, you should consider updating.
If this does not remove the bug you have encountered, please be so kind as to file a bug first against the respective K Software Compilation.
If this should not prove to be sucessful in the next two years, please reconsider opening the bug here.
Before that, it will be futile anyway.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232496</id>
	<title>K does not stand for Kool</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1257170400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Geesh, is that misconception ever going to die?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Geesh , is that misconception ever going to die ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geesh, is that misconception ever going to die?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30254144</id>
	<title>Re:3.5</title>
	<author>Anne Honime</author>
	<datestamp>1259418900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is silly. 4.0 was an alpha version, not a failure, 4.1 a beta and 4.2 a RC. But 4.3 is actually extremely good at what it does. I barely ever used 3.5 before, it was either too bloated for the computers I had, or much too crash-prone. But it wasn't anymore useful than a plain window manager. In any cases, if I need something lean, then I take windowmaker over kde 3.5 anytime. KDE 4.3 is an entirely different league. Either you want it for your comfort and productivity, and you have a computer with the guts to run it correctly (I found that it's a breeze on an AMD X86\_64 x2 3800+ with 4Gb RAM), or you deal with somewhat older hardware, and then you're better off with an entirely different and much less taxing window manager than any KDE version (xfce, window maker...). Since day 1, KDE is synonymous with huge RAM footprint, general bloat, and ressources hunger in exchange for nice effects, usability helpers, graphical wonders and user comfort. Either you cope with that, or you get away, but you can't have both.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is silly .
4.0 was an alpha version , not a failure , 4.1 a beta and 4.2 a RC .
But 4.3 is actually extremely good at what it does .
I barely ever used 3.5 before , it was either too bloated for the computers I had , or much too crash-prone .
But it was n't anymore useful than a plain window manager .
In any cases , if I need something lean , then I take windowmaker over kde 3.5 anytime .
KDE 4.3 is an entirely different league .
Either you want it for your comfort and productivity , and you have a computer with the guts to run it correctly ( I found that it 's a breeze on an AMD X86 \ _64 x2 3800 + with 4Gb RAM ) , or you deal with somewhat older hardware , and then you 're better off with an entirely different and much less taxing window manager than any KDE version ( xfce , window maker... ) .
Since day 1 , KDE is synonymous with huge RAM footprint , general bloat , and ressources hunger in exchange for nice effects , usability helpers , graphical wonders and user comfort .
Either you cope with that , or you get away , but you ca n't have both .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is silly.
4.0 was an alpha version, not a failure, 4.1 a beta and 4.2 a RC.
But 4.3 is actually extremely good at what it does.
I barely ever used 3.5 before, it was either too bloated for the computers I had, or much too crash-prone.
But it wasn't anymore useful than a plain window manager.
In any cases, if I need something lean, then I take windowmaker over kde 3.5 anytime.
KDE 4.3 is an entirely different league.
Either you want it for your comfort and productivity, and you have a computer with the guts to run it correctly (I found that it's a breeze on an AMD X86\_64 x2 3800+ with 4Gb RAM), or you deal with somewhat older hardware, and then you're better off with an entirely different and much less taxing window manager than any KDE version (xfce, window maker...).
Since day 1, KDE is synonymous with huge RAM footprint, general bloat, and ressources hunger in exchange for nice effects, usability helpers, graphical wonders and user comfort.
Either you cope with that, or you get away, but you can't have both.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233830</id>
	<title>Re:K does not stand for Kool</title>
	<author>No Eye Deer</author>
	<datestamp>1257183240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are you sure about that?<br>
<a href="http://groups.google.com/group/de.comp.os.linux.misc/msg/cb4b2d67ffc3ffce" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/de.comp.os.linux.misc/msg/cb4b2d67ffc3ffce</a> [google.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you sure about that ?
http : //groups.google.com/group/de.comp.os.linux.misc/msg/cb4b2d67ffc3ffce [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you sure about that?
http://groups.google.com/group/de.comp.os.linux.misc/msg/cb4b2d67ffc3ffce [google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30238518</id>
	<title>Re:Windoze lovin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259263080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No words, just Facepalm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No words , just Facepalm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No words, just Facepalm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231878</id>
	<title>Klone Desktop Environement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257165840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>because it was originaly developed as a clone of CDE.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>because it was originaly developed as a clone of CDE .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because it was originaly developed as a clone of CDE.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231190</id>
	<title>New acronym?</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1257160860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's now to be known as the KDEPDXFCE?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's now to be known as the KDEPDXFCE ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's now to be known as the KDEPDXFCE?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231432</id>
	<title>Re:the triumph of buzzwords!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257162240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that is not off topic you stupid moronic mod</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that is not off topic you stupid moronic mod</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that is not off topic you stupid moronic mod</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234292</id>
	<title>Re:Wrods for mare mortals</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257189060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've got news for you - no amount of marketing money would make a name like GIMP gain wide acceptance.</p></div><p>I've got news to you:  nobody but some elitist slashdot users who think they know what the "industry" is like cares that the application is called GIMP.  It could be called Crippled, and nobody would care, other than laugh at the water cooler.  It's not like it's a swear word or anything.</p><p>The reason nobody uses GIMP is another one entirely:  the interface fucking sucks.  Not to mention that it's ugly as hell.  This is forgivable in other applications, but you can't sell fucking graphic artists, people who make a living on their sense of aesthetics, on an application that looks ugly.  That's pretty much why Macs have dominated that segment.  Not because it could do more (it never could, photoshop has always worked on PC's), but because it appealed to graphic's peoples sense of aesthetics.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got news for you - no amount of marketing money would make a name like GIMP gain wide acceptance.I 've got news to you : nobody but some elitist slashdot users who think they know what the " industry " is like cares that the application is called GIMP .
It could be called Crippled , and nobody would care , other than laugh at the water cooler .
It 's not like it 's a swear word or anything.The reason nobody uses GIMP is another one entirely : the interface fucking sucks .
Not to mention that it 's ugly as hell .
This is forgivable in other applications , but you ca n't sell fucking graphic artists , people who make a living on their sense of aesthetics , on an application that looks ugly .
That 's pretty much why Macs have dominated that segment .
Not because it could do more ( it never could , photoshop has always worked on PC 's ) , but because it appealed to graphic 's peoples sense of aesthetics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got news for you - no amount of marketing money would make a name like GIMP gain wide acceptance.I've got news to you:  nobody but some elitist slashdot users who think they know what the "industry" is like cares that the application is called GIMP.
It could be called Crippled, and nobody would care, other than laugh at the water cooler.
It's not like it's a swear word or anything.The reason nobody uses GIMP is another one entirely:  the interface fucking sucks.
Not to mention that it's ugly as hell.
This is forgivable in other applications, but you can't sell fucking graphic artists, people who make a living on their sense of aesthetics, on an application that looks ugly.
That's pretty much why Macs have dominated that segment.
Not because it could do more (it never could, photoshop has always worked on PC's), but because it appealed to graphic's peoples sense of aesthetics.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568</id>
	<title>Re:Wrods for mare mortals</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257163080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>WTF is Aqua? WTF is Glass? WTF is Snow Leopard? WTF is Safari? WTF do I need to Access? How in the world does one lauch a Word? WTF am I supposed to Excel at? WTF is Vista? WTF is Zune? WTF is that Blue Ray? WTF is in Ex Box 360? WTF is anything without lots of marketing money?</htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF is Aqua ?
WTF is Glass ?
WTF is Snow Leopard ?
WTF is Safari ?
WTF do I need to Access ?
How in the world does one lauch a Word ?
WTF am I supposed to Excel at ?
WTF is Vista ?
WTF is Zune ?
WTF is that Blue Ray ?
WTF is in Ex Box 360 ?
WTF is anything without lots of marketing money ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF is Aqua?
WTF is Glass?
WTF is Snow Leopard?
WTF is Safari?
WTF do I need to Access?
How in the world does one lauch a Word?
WTF am I supposed to Excel at?
WTF is Vista?
WTF is Zune?
WTF is that Blue Ray?
WTF is in Ex Box 360?
WTF is anything without lots of marketing money?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233810</id>
	<title>Re:Wrods for mare mortals</title>
	<author>mopslik</author>
	<datestamp>1257183120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>no amount of marketing money would make a name like GIMP gain wide acceptance.</p></div></blockquote><p>So... you're saying I should reevaluate my KDE Ultimate Network Tool then?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>no amount of marketing money would make a name like GIMP gain wide acceptance.So... you 're saying I should reevaluate my KDE Ultimate Network Tool then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no amount of marketing money would make a name like GIMP gain wide acceptance.So... you're saying I should reevaluate my KDE Ultimate Network Tool then?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231094</id>
	<title>Clarity?</title>
	<author>cgenman</author>
	<datestamp>1257159960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great!  Now Linux will still have two major competing desktops. But now one of them could be one of several separate versions, or some applications on a different desktop, or a version of Windows running Koffice.  Thanks, clarity committee!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great !
Now Linux will still have two major competing desktops .
But now one of them could be one of several separate versions , or some applications on a different desktop , or a version of Windows running Koffice .
Thanks , clarity committee !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great!
Now Linux will still have two major competing desktops.
But now one of them could be one of several separate versions, or some applications on a different desktop, or a version of Windows running Koffice.
Thanks, clarity committee!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231156</id>
	<title>Krap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257160620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>yes its true.</htmltext>
<tokenext>yes its true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yes its true.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231966</id>
	<title>It's just a name</title>
	<author>tywjohn</author>
	<datestamp>1257166740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>subject says it all</htmltext>
<tokenext>subject says it all</tokentext>
<sentencetext>subject says it all</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235474</id>
	<title>Re:3.5</title>
	<author>Kjella</author>
	<datestamp>1259235600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>KDE3 was a very solid house. But the foundation just can't take building anything more on top. Qt3 is dead, arts is dead, so much of the technlogy is dead. Maybe they got a little bit carried away when they designed KDE4 but the foundation had to change. Going back to KDE3 just isn't an option.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>KDE3 was a very solid house .
But the foundation just ca n't take building anything more on top .
Qt3 is dead , arts is dead , so much of the technlogy is dead .
Maybe they got a little bit carried away when they designed KDE4 but the foundation had to change .
Going back to KDE3 just is n't an option .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KDE3 was a very solid house.
But the foundation just can't take building anything more on top.
Qt3 is dead, arts is dead, so much of the technlogy is dead.
Maybe they got a little bit carried away when they designed KDE4 but the foundation had to change.
Going back to KDE3 just isn't an option.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234740</id>
	<title>Czech</title>
	<author>kikito</author>
	<datestamp>1259226360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I allways thought KDE was the Czech word for "Where". I guess I was wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I allways thought KDE was the Czech word for " Where " .
I guess I was wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I allways thought KDE was the Czech word for "Where".
I guess I was wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233004</id>
	<title>Re:Wrods for mare mortals</title>
	<author>sowth</author>
	<datestamp>1257174420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should try our agency. We'll not only make everyone fell sorry for the GIMP, but whe will make every woman want to have pity sex with him!

</p><p>Broken Knobb, Inventor of Enhanzzxd Wyerds and President of Cripple-Stroke Addvertizing Agency++.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should try our agency .
We 'll not only make everyone fell sorry for the GIMP , but whe will make every woman want to have pity sex with him !
Broken Knobb , Inventor of Enhanzzxd Wyerds and President of Cripple-Stroke Addvertizing Agency + + .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should try our agency.
We'll not only make everyone fell sorry for the GIMP, but whe will make every woman want to have pity sex with him!
Broken Knobb, Inventor of Enhanzzxd Wyerds and President of Cripple-Stroke Addvertizing Agency++.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231228</id>
	<title>Re:Clarity?</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1257161040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Thanks, clarity committee!</p></div><p>Uh, that would be "klarity", not "clarity"  thanks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks , clarity committee ! Uh , that would be " klarity " , not " clarity " thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks, clarity committee!Uh, that would be "klarity", not "clarity"  thanks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234408</id>
	<title>Re:The sweet stink of rebranding!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257191520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also remember:<br>SunOS -&gt; Solaris</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also remember : SunOS - &gt; Solaris</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also remember:SunOS -&gt; Solaris</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232436</id>
	<title>"Plasma Netbook" is the right approach IMO</title>
	<author>Lemming Mark</author>
	<datestamp>1257169980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Plasma isn't just that thing for making desktop widgets of dubious usefulness.  What KDE has actually done is, in my opinion, a fairly smart design move regardless of whether you like their implementation.</p><p>Desktop widgets aren't applications, they are people extending the functionality of their desktop.  What the KDE folks saw was that a well-designed API could be used to write the desktop UI itself (task bar, clock, pager, whatever), the things we used to use taskbar applets for (media player control, etc) and the flashy new desktop widgets.  Instead of having a basic desktop and plastering a widget API on top, they've gone and unified the whole thing so you can use the same API to write taskbar applets, widgets or write replacement taskbars or<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... whatever.  The various desktop elements are separate building blocks (plasmoids) that can be assembled together.  They've also produced loads of bindings for this API to give folks the chance to write stuff in their favourite language.</p><p>The plasma netbook interface then takes some of the default building plasmoids, adds some new ones and then glues them together in a different way.  So you can get a similar family look and similar functionality (and, fundamentally, the same desktop) but in a way that's optimised for a different form factor of device.  I think that's actually pretty neat and somewhat reminiscent of the way you can configure and compile the core Linux kernel down for tiny machines or up to big iron whilst still getting the benefits of a common codebase.</p><p>There's a load of other cool stuff including a standard set of "data engines" which separate producing data from displaying it, thus making it easy to glue data sources together in interesting ways.  Despite the various feature regressions that rewriting the desktop led to, it's a really neat architecture and should hopefully stand them in good stead for the future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Plasma is n't just that thing for making desktop widgets of dubious usefulness .
What KDE has actually done is , in my opinion , a fairly smart design move regardless of whether you like their implementation.Desktop widgets are n't applications , they are people extending the functionality of their desktop .
What the KDE folks saw was that a well-designed API could be used to write the desktop UI itself ( task bar , clock , pager , whatever ) , the things we used to use taskbar applets for ( media player control , etc ) and the flashy new desktop widgets .
Instead of having a basic desktop and plastering a widget API on top , they 've gone and unified the whole thing so you can use the same API to write taskbar applets , widgets or write replacement taskbars or ... whatever. The various desktop elements are separate building blocks ( plasmoids ) that can be assembled together .
They 've also produced loads of bindings for this API to give folks the chance to write stuff in their favourite language.The plasma netbook interface then takes some of the default building plasmoids , adds some new ones and then glues them together in a different way .
So you can get a similar family look and similar functionality ( and , fundamentally , the same desktop ) but in a way that 's optimised for a different form factor of device .
I think that 's actually pretty neat and somewhat reminiscent of the way you can configure and compile the core Linux kernel down for tiny machines or up to big iron whilst still getting the benefits of a common codebase.There 's a load of other cool stuff including a standard set of " data engines " which separate producing data from displaying it , thus making it easy to glue data sources together in interesting ways .
Despite the various feature regressions that rewriting the desktop led to , it 's a really neat architecture and should hopefully stand them in good stead for the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Plasma isn't just that thing for making desktop widgets of dubious usefulness.
What KDE has actually done is, in my opinion, a fairly smart design move regardless of whether you like their implementation.Desktop widgets aren't applications, they are people extending the functionality of their desktop.
What the KDE folks saw was that a well-designed API could be used to write the desktop UI itself (task bar, clock, pager, whatever), the things we used to use taskbar applets for (media player control, etc) and the flashy new desktop widgets.
Instead of having a basic desktop and plastering a widget API on top, they've gone and unified the whole thing so you can use the same API to write taskbar applets, widgets or write replacement taskbars or ... whatever.  The various desktop elements are separate building blocks (plasmoids) that can be assembled together.
They've also produced loads of bindings for this API to give folks the chance to write stuff in their favourite language.The plasma netbook interface then takes some of the default building plasmoids, adds some new ones and then glues them together in a different way.
So you can get a similar family look and similar functionality (and, fundamentally, the same desktop) but in a way that's optimised for a different form factor of device.
I think that's actually pretty neat and somewhat reminiscent of the way you can configure and compile the core Linux kernel down for tiny machines or up to big iron whilst still getting the benefits of a common codebase.There's a load of other cool stuff including a standard set of "data engines" which separate producing data from displaying it, thus making it easy to glue data sources together in interesting ways.
Despite the various feature regressions that rewriting the desktop led to, it's a really neat architecture and should hopefully stand them in good stead for the future.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232354</id>
	<title>Re:I want</title>
	<author>Randle\_Revar</author>
	<datestamp>1257169380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;PulseAudio: the bane of my linux desktop experience !</p><p>Works great for me!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; PulseAudio : the bane of my linux desktop experience ! Works great for me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;PulseAudio: the bane of my linux desktop experience !Works great for me!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235308</id>
	<title>Re:sounds exiting</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1259233740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, it will proactively utilise the upcoming technologies of generation 2.0 content. This was all blue-skied before the most recent networking conference, you should get your programmers to <a href="http://xkcd.net/664/" title="xkcd.net">look at your Blackberry</a> [xkcd.net]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , it will proactively utilise the upcoming technologies of generation 2.0 content .
This was all blue-skied before the most recent networking conference , you should get your programmers to look at your Blackberry [ xkcd.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, it will proactively utilise the upcoming technologies of generation 2.0 content.
This was all blue-skied before the most recent networking conference, you should get your programmers to look at your Blackberry [xkcd.net]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231208</id>
	<title>Re:K?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257160980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A shell I can get behind, but Gnome?  That dumbed down baby GUI?  Get serious</htmltext>
<tokenext>A shell I can get behind , but Gnome ?
That dumbed down baby GUI ?
Get serious</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A shell I can get behind, but Gnome?
That dumbed down baby GUI?
Get serious</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231230</id>
	<title>Let me guess</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257161100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>you use windows.</htmltext>
<tokenext>you use windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you use windows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231066</id>
	<title>SYNERGY!</title>
	<author>Frosty Piss</author>
	<datestamp>1257159660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now they need to add SYNERGY!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now they need to add SYNERGY !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now they need to add SYNERGY!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232406</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid</title>
	<author>w0mprat</author>
	<datestamp>1257169800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You know, the <b>[insert OS team here]</b> guys just don't get it.</p></div><p>There, fixed that for you.<br> <br> You were too specific, what you said actually applies to many software development outfits. (Queue next FTFY with 'Many'-&gt;'ALL' in 3..2.) We're blessed with so much excellent, stable elegant, technology at a line-by-line code level, that potential somehow seems to be mangled by the time it's put together as a package such that it barely works. Linux Desktop: where whole ends up being less than the sum of the parts. <br> <br> I don't know whether it's a pathological deficiency of right-brain thinking that we've been needing for a long time, or simply that good designers are not good coders, coders are not good designers and the exception to this rule is rare - added that neither group gets along and the occasional dude who can do both is shunned and stoned to death by both groups.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , the [ insert OS team here ] guys just do n't get it.There , fixed that for you .
You were too specific , what you said actually applies to many software development outfits .
( Queue next FTFY with 'Many'- &gt; 'ALL ' in 3..2 .
) We 're blessed with so much excellent , stable elegant , technology at a line-by-line code level , that potential somehow seems to be mangled by the time it 's put together as a package such that it barely works .
Linux Desktop : where whole ends up being less than the sum of the parts .
I do n't know whether it 's a pathological deficiency of right-brain thinking that we 've been needing for a long time , or simply that good designers are not good coders , coders are not good designers and the exception to this rule is rare - added that neither group gets along and the occasional dude who can do both is shunned and stoned to death by both groups .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, the [insert OS team here] guys just don't get it.There, fixed that for you.
You were too specific, what you said actually applies to many software development outfits.
(Queue next FTFY with 'Many'-&gt;'ALL' in 3..2.
) We're blessed with so much excellent, stable elegant, technology at a line-by-line code level, that potential somehow seems to be mangled by the time it's put together as a package such that it barely works.
Linux Desktop: where whole ends up being less than the sum of the parts.
I don't know whether it's a pathological deficiency of right-brain thinking that we've been needing for a long time, or simply that good designers are not good coders, coders are not good designers and the exception to this rule is rare - added that neither group gets along and the occasional dude who can do both is shunned and stoned to death by both groups.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231542</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231178</id>
	<title>great timing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257160800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The marketing wizards at the KDE project have done it again.  After years of going neck and neck in the HDTV market, LCD is finally pulling ahead of plasma, to the point where manufacturers in the Far East are starting to abandon plasma altogether.  In the minds of the public,</p><p>Plasma = dead horse</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The marketing wizards at the KDE project have done it again .
After years of going neck and neck in the HDTV market , LCD is finally pulling ahead of plasma , to the point where manufacturers in the Far East are starting to abandon plasma altogether .
In the minds of the public,Plasma = dead horse</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The marketing wizards at the KDE project have done it again.
After years of going neck and neck in the HDTV market, LCD is finally pulling ahead of plasma, to the point where manufacturers in the Far East are starting to abandon plasma altogether.
In the minds of the public,Plasma = dead horse</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234972</id>
	<title>Re:3.5</title>
	<author>IrquiM</author>
	<datestamp>1259230020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why?</p><p>I used 3.5 until 4.2.2, and then switched. See no reason to switch back, as KDE4 delivers the required functionality and bling for a standard normal user.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ? I used 3.5 until 4.2.2 , and then switched .
See no reason to switch back , as KDE4 delivers the required functionality and bling for a standard normal user .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?I used 3.5 until 4.2.2, and then switched.
See no reason to switch back, as KDE4 delivers the required functionality and bling for a standard normal user.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232704</id>
	<title>plasma</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1257172140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>My mom would be like WTF is PLASMA.</p></div><p>It's like LCD, except it's BIGGER and uses three times the ELECTRICITY. It's also part of your BLOOD that you can SELL.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My mom would be like WTF is PLASMA.It 's like LCD , except it 's BIGGER and uses three times the ELECTRICITY .
It 's also part of your BLOOD that you can SELL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My mom would be like WTF is PLASMA.It's like LCD, except it's BIGGER and uses three times the ELECTRICITY.
It's also part of your BLOOD that you can SELL.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231800</id>
	<title>Re:K?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257165120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a shitload better than Plasma is. Even with the super flaky 2.28 release, Gnome is more stable, has a better feature set, provides better application integration (even though its design more closely resembles a clusterfuck) and, aside from the panel, looks nicer than KDE a this point. Besides this, it uses a lot less memory.</p><p>I used to love KDE, too, when it was in the 3.5 series, but every distro I care about started replacing KDE 3.x with 4.x the moment 4.0 rolled out the door (complete with showstopper bugs, like not having a desktop to speak of, not being able to set a wallpaper, and being able to not crash for more than five minutes) forced me to Gnome. While I agree it's a far cry from what KDE 3.5 was, it's a lot better than KDE 4.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a shitload better than Plasma is .
Even with the super flaky 2.28 release , Gnome is more stable , has a better feature set , provides better application integration ( even though its design more closely resembles a clusterfuck ) and , aside from the panel , looks nicer than KDE a this point .
Besides this , it uses a lot less memory.I used to love KDE , too , when it was in the 3.5 series , but every distro I care about started replacing KDE 3.x with 4.x the moment 4.0 rolled out the door ( complete with showstopper bugs , like not having a desktop to speak of , not being able to set a wallpaper , and being able to not crash for more than five minutes ) forced me to Gnome .
While I agree it 's a far cry from what KDE 3.5 was , it 's a lot better than KDE 4 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a shitload better than Plasma is.
Even with the super flaky 2.28 release, Gnome is more stable, has a better feature set, provides better application integration (even though its design more closely resembles a clusterfuck) and, aside from the panel, looks nicer than KDE a this point.
Besides this, it uses a lot less memory.I used to love KDE, too, when it was in the 3.5 series, but every distro I care about started replacing KDE 3.x with 4.x the moment 4.0 rolled out the door (complete with showstopper bugs, like not having a desktop to speak of, not being able to set a wallpaper, and being able to not crash for more than five minutes) forced me to Gnome.
While I agree it's a far cry from what KDE 3.5 was, it's a lot better than KDE 4.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231542</id>
	<title>Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257162900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, the KDE guys just don't get it.</p><p>They almost remind me of Commodore, during the Amiga days. They have this really cool technology, but it doesn't work as well as you want it to and has some glaring deficiencies, and their marketing department is absolutely clueless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , the KDE guys just do n't get it.They almost remind me of Commodore , during the Amiga days .
They have this really cool technology , but it does n't work as well as you want it to and has some glaring deficiencies , and their marketing department is absolutely clueless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, the KDE guys just don't get it.They almost remind me of Commodore, during the Amiga days.
They have this really cool technology, but it doesn't work as well as you want it to and has some glaring deficiencies, and their marketing department is absolutely clueless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233454</id>
	<title>3.5</title>
	<author>gatkinso</author>
	<datestamp>1257178800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>KDE folks:  revert to 3.5 while you still have a user base.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>KDE folks : revert to 3.5 while you still have a user base .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KDE folks:  revert to 3.5 while you still have a user base.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232458</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid</title>
	<author>zaivala</author>
	<datestamp>1257170100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>LOL Yeah, the only thing I use KDE for is on Windoze to get some Kool games...  Gnome is just as flexible and tons faster...</htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL Yeah , the only thing I use KDE for is on Windoze to get some Kool games... Gnome is just as flexible and tons faster.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL Yeah, the only thing I use KDE for is on Windoze to get some Kool games...  Gnome is just as flexible and tons faster...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231542</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231226</id>
	<title>sounds exiting</title>
	<author>Punto</author>
	<datestamp>1257161040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>will it be able to leverage the synergies of social media 2.0 user-facing semantics?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>will it be able to leverage the synergies of social media 2.0 user-facing semantics ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>will it be able to leverage the synergies of social media 2.0 user-facing semantics?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231080</id>
	<title>KDE Plasma Desktop renamed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257159780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its now called GNOME.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its now called GNOME .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its now called GNOME.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234060</id>
	<title>Re:The sweet stink of rebranding!</title>
	<author>oddman</author>
	<datestamp>1257185940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah re-branding never works.<p>
Netscape &gt; Mozilla &gt; Phoenix &gt; Firebird &gt; Firefox.

Colored Apple Logo &gt; White Apple Logo

Star Office &gt; Openoffice.org

oh wait....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah re-branding never works .
Netscape &gt; Mozilla &gt; Phoenix &gt; Firebird &gt; Firefox .
Colored Apple Logo &gt; White Apple Logo Star Office &gt; Openoffice.org oh wait... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah re-branding never works.
Netscape &gt; Mozilla &gt; Phoenix &gt; Firebird &gt; Firefox.
Colored Apple Logo &gt; White Apple Logo

Star Office &gt; Openoffice.org

oh wait....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231276</id>
	<title>Amarok on windows</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1257161460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>independently market the various KDE applications as usable in any workspace, whether it be the Plasma Desktop, Windows, or XFCE.</p></div><p>Where's my Amarok on winders, and why does a simple port need all kinds of name changing foolishness?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>independently market the various KDE applications as usable in any workspace , whether it be the Plasma Desktop , Windows , or XFCE.Where 's my Amarok on winders , and why does a simple port need all kinds of name changing foolishness ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>independently market the various KDE applications as usable in any workspace, whether it be the Plasma Desktop, Windows, or XFCE.Where's my Amarok on winders, and why does a simple port need all kinds of name changing foolishness?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231252</id>
	<title>Re:Clarity?</title>
	<author>TheModelEskimo</author>
	<datestamp>1257161220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Two? Linux will always have a million+ competing desktops. Linux is there to be customized, man, from the kernel on up. The fact that we currently think of the desktop as some specific thing is messing you up. Think about workflows. Think about a personal brand of work-fu or play-fu that you develop in partnership with your Linux machines. Your workflow is so good, you take on an apprentice to teach it to. He's thanking his lucky stars that someone who can create workflow experiences like you can would be willing to let him in the door to learn the trade.<br> <br>

I've said it before: You talk like Windows(TM) and Mac OS (TM) are these wonderful things because they're monoliths. But we've learned from monoliths and their creators that there is no "clarity" in that direction, only broken promises. One size doesn't fit all. The new landscape of devices and interfaces will give you clarity and specificity in exchange for your old monolith. If you won't trade it in, prepare to be left in the dust.<br> <br>

We'll look back at monolithic desktop computing and wonder what on earth kind of idiots we were to sit in front of this thing all day, all using the same basic type of chair, same keyboard with carpal tunnel syndrome included, and interfaces that worked like something only a masochist would use.<br> <br>

Anyway, back to writing another Nautilus script.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Two ?
Linux will always have a million + competing desktops .
Linux is there to be customized , man , from the kernel on up .
The fact that we currently think of the desktop as some specific thing is messing you up .
Think about workflows .
Think about a personal brand of work-fu or play-fu that you develop in partnership with your Linux machines .
Your workflow is so good , you take on an apprentice to teach it to .
He 's thanking his lucky stars that someone who can create workflow experiences like you can would be willing to let him in the door to learn the trade .
I 've said it before : You talk like Windows ( TM ) and Mac OS ( TM ) are these wonderful things because they 're monoliths .
But we 've learned from monoliths and their creators that there is no " clarity " in that direction , only broken promises .
One size does n't fit all .
The new landscape of devices and interfaces will give you clarity and specificity in exchange for your old monolith .
If you wo n't trade it in , prepare to be left in the dust .
We 'll look back at monolithic desktop computing and wonder what on earth kind of idiots we were to sit in front of this thing all day , all using the same basic type of chair , same keyboard with carpal tunnel syndrome included , and interfaces that worked like something only a masochist would use .
Anyway , back to writing another Nautilus script .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two?
Linux will always have a million+ competing desktops.
Linux is there to be customized, man, from the kernel on up.
The fact that we currently think of the desktop as some specific thing is messing you up.
Think about workflows.
Think about a personal brand of work-fu or play-fu that you develop in partnership with your Linux machines.
Your workflow is so good, you take on an apprentice to teach it to.
He's thanking his lucky stars that someone who can create workflow experiences like you can would be willing to let him in the door to learn the trade.
I've said it before: You talk like Windows(TM) and Mac OS (TM) are these wonderful things because they're monoliths.
But we've learned from monoliths and their creators that there is no "clarity" in that direction, only broken promises.
One size doesn't fit all.
The new landscape of devices and interfaces will give you clarity and specificity in exchange for your old monolith.
If you won't trade it in, prepare to be left in the dust.
We'll look back at monolithic desktop computing and wonder what on earth kind of idiots we were to sit in front of this thing all day, all using the same basic type of chair, same keyboard with carpal tunnel syndrome included, and interfaces that worked like something only a masochist would use.
Anyway, back to writing another Nautilus script.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231752</id>
	<title>Re:Clarity?</title>
	<author>mr\_lizard13</author>
	<datestamp>1257164820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kheers!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kheers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kheers!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233140</id>
	<title>The sweet stink of rebranding!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257175620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>For me, at least, "rebranding" has always had a certain stink of failure about it. (I like KDE, BTW, so don't lose your fucking minds.)<p>
Witness:
</p><ul>
<li>Palm, Inc. &gt; PalmOne + PalmSource &gt; Palm, Inc.</li><li>Tropicana  &gt; Tropicana "generic crappy label" &gt; Tropicana</li><li>AOL &gt; LOL "remedial art-school" logo</li></ul><p>
How did you feel while the respective companies were doing this? Is there anyone in the room that remembers reading the headline, "Palm splits into PalmSource and PalmOne," and thought, "Man, that's some <i>sexy</i> marketing right there. I need to get me a Treo but quick." No. We saw it and thought, "the shark has been jumped, the drain is being circled." Yes, you did.</p><p>
While I'm on a roll, for shits and giggles, let's look at the bastard sibling of rebranding, "editions."
</p><ul>
<li>Toothpaste. Now was that Crest Tartar Control plus Whitening, or Crest Whitening plus Tartar Control? And did you want that in paste or gel? I swear, we need meta-toothpaste, where it's formulated on the spot. You have a big board with all sorts of shit like "mint," "sparkly" (for the child or man-child in your household), "tartar control," and buzzword of the year, "whitening." Then you push a whole bunch and hit the <b>MIX</b> button, and get a toothpaste tube with all that shit custom-made. It'd be like ordering an HP server; it'd even warn you about compatibility issues! But I digress.</li><li>Windows 98 &gt; Windows XP. Then it hit the fan. Windows Vista Home Basic + Home Premium + Business + Ultimate. I won't get into Windows 7, but suffice to say there's an edition for <i>everyone</i>, even your crazy next-door neighbor that listens to Yanni all day, has an alpaca fetish, and taught his kids to communicate solely in Klingon. (Sorry if I've touched a nerve amongst anyone here.)</li><li>Sun is particularly adept at this. You can almost taste the management schizophrenia: Solaris &gt; Solaris Express Community Edition + OpenSolaris + Solaris &gt; Solaris + OpenSolaris (not including Indiana, Nevada, et al. the distinctions between which I'm not sure anyone truly understands). Besides, half the stuff will be discontinued by the time you read this, so why bother itemizing it all?</li></ul><p>
The moral of the story, kids, is that <i>rebranding</i> is for the desperate, and <i>editions</i> are for suckers.</p><p>
Peace out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For me , at least , " rebranding " has always had a certain stink of failure about it .
( I like KDE , BTW , so do n't lose your fucking minds .
) Witness : Palm , Inc. &gt; PalmOne + PalmSource &gt; Palm , Inc.Tropicana &gt; Tropicana " generic crappy label " &gt; TropicanaAOL &gt; LOL " remedial art-school " logo How did you feel while the respective companies were doing this ?
Is there anyone in the room that remembers reading the headline , " Palm splits into PalmSource and PalmOne , " and thought , " Man , that 's some sexy marketing right there .
I need to get me a Treo but quick .
" No .
We saw it and thought , " the shark has been jumped , the drain is being circled .
" Yes , you did .
While I 'm on a roll , for shits and giggles , let 's look at the bastard sibling of rebranding , " editions .
" Toothpaste .
Now was that Crest Tartar Control plus Whitening , or Crest Whitening plus Tartar Control ?
And did you want that in paste or gel ?
I swear , we need meta-toothpaste , where it 's formulated on the spot .
You have a big board with all sorts of shit like " mint , " " sparkly " ( for the child or man-child in your household ) , " tartar control , " and buzzword of the year , " whitening .
" Then you push a whole bunch and hit the MIX button , and get a toothpaste tube with all that shit custom-made .
It 'd be like ordering an HP server ; it 'd even warn you about compatibility issues !
But I digress.Windows 98 &gt; Windows XP .
Then it hit the fan .
Windows Vista Home Basic + Home Premium + Business + Ultimate .
I wo n't get into Windows 7 , but suffice to say there 's an edition for everyone , even your crazy next-door neighbor that listens to Yanni all day , has an alpaca fetish , and taught his kids to communicate solely in Klingon .
( Sorry if I 've touched a nerve amongst anyone here .
) Sun is particularly adept at this .
You can almost taste the management schizophrenia : Solaris &gt; Solaris Express Community Edition + OpenSolaris + Solaris &gt; Solaris + OpenSolaris ( not including Indiana , Nevada , et al .
the distinctions between which I 'm not sure anyone truly understands ) .
Besides , half the stuff will be discontinued by the time you read this , so why bother itemizing it all ?
The moral of the story , kids , is that rebranding is for the desperate , and editions are for suckers .
Peace out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For me, at least, "rebranding" has always had a certain stink of failure about it.
(I like KDE, BTW, so don't lose your fucking minds.
)
Witness:

Palm, Inc. &gt; PalmOne + PalmSource &gt; Palm, Inc.Tropicana  &gt; Tropicana "generic crappy label" &gt; TropicanaAOL &gt; LOL "remedial art-school" logo
How did you feel while the respective companies were doing this?
Is there anyone in the room that remembers reading the headline, "Palm splits into PalmSource and PalmOne," and thought, "Man, that's some sexy marketing right there.
I need to get me a Treo but quick.
" No.
We saw it and thought, "the shark has been jumped, the drain is being circled.
" Yes, you did.
While I'm on a roll, for shits and giggles, let's look at the bastard sibling of rebranding, "editions.
"

Toothpaste.
Now was that Crest Tartar Control plus Whitening, or Crest Whitening plus Tartar Control?
And did you want that in paste or gel?
I swear, we need meta-toothpaste, where it's formulated on the spot.
You have a big board with all sorts of shit like "mint," "sparkly" (for the child or man-child in your household), "tartar control," and buzzword of the year, "whitening.
" Then you push a whole bunch and hit the MIX button, and get a toothpaste tube with all that shit custom-made.
It'd be like ordering an HP server; it'd even warn you about compatibility issues!
But I digress.Windows 98 &gt; Windows XP.
Then it hit the fan.
Windows Vista Home Basic + Home Premium + Business + Ultimate.
I won't get into Windows 7, but suffice to say there's an edition for everyone, even your crazy next-door neighbor that listens to Yanni all day, has an alpaca fetish, and taught his kids to communicate solely in Klingon.
(Sorry if I've touched a nerve amongst anyone here.
)Sun is particularly adept at this.
You can almost taste the management schizophrenia: Solaris &gt; Solaris Express Community Edition + OpenSolaris + Solaris &gt; Solaris + OpenSolaris (not including Indiana, Nevada, et al.
the distinctions between which I'm not sure anyone truly understands).
Besides, half the stuff will be discontinued by the time you read this, so why bother itemizing it all?
The moral of the story, kids, is that rebranding is for the desperate, and editions are for suckers.
Peace out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232938</id>
	<title>KDE vs. XF(e)CE(s)</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1257173820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When she needed to edit some photos I got her to download GIMP. You know know what she said... Only after I explained to her what is was did she kinda accept the name.</p></div><p>But is "XFCE" (possibly pronounced like XFeces) much better?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When she needed to edit some photos I got her to download GIMP .
You know know what she said... Only after I explained to her what is was did she kinda accept the name.But is " XFCE " ( possibly pronounced like XFeces ) much better ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When she needed to edit some photos I got her to download GIMP.
You know know what she said... Only after I explained to her what is was did she kinda accept the name.But is "XFCE" (possibly pronounced like XFeces) much better?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232536</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>Risen888</author>
	<datestamp>1257170880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to the people they're hoping to reach with this move (they don't even know what KDE is).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to the people they 're hoping to reach with this move ( they do n't even know what KDE is ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to the people they're hoping to reach with this move (they don't even know what KDE is).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231118</id>
	<title>So it's:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257160140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>KPD now?</p><p>(And saying the community did [blank] is very misleading.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>KPD now ?
( And saying the community did [ blank ] is very misleading .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KPD now?
(And saying the community did [blank] is very misleading.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231588</id>
	<title>Re:sounds exiting</title>
	<author>TheGreatOrangePeel</author>
	<datestamp>1257163320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>will it be able to leverage the synergies of social media 2.0 user-facing semantics?</p></div></blockquote><p>
You must be a consultant. Oh, wait, that was a question. You must be the manager of a team of software engineers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>will it be able to leverage the synergies of social media 2.0 user-facing semantics ?
You must be a consultant .
Oh , wait , that was a question .
You must be the manager of a team of software engineers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>will it be able to leverage the synergies of social media 2.0 user-facing semantics?
You must be a consultant.
Oh, wait, that was a question.
You must be the manager of a team of software engineers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231788</id>
	<title>Not sure about you folks...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257165060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...but I prefer XFCE to KDE.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...but I prefer XFCE to KDE .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but I prefer XFCE to KDE.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234438</id>
	<title>KDE, you are no Amiga.</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1257191880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>KDE is not Amiga.  When you first saw an Amiga running Deluxe Paint or any of the other things that it could do when it first came out, it was a life changing experience if you cared about multimedia.  KDE is an ok desktop.  I honestly don't even think it is as good as Windows 7.  All KDE is a Desktop shell, control set, and some apps, like Windows Explorer and USER and Notepad, and one that took too long to write and still has no tools.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>KDE is not Amiga .
When you first saw an Amiga running Deluxe Paint or any of the other things that it could do when it first came out , it was a life changing experience if you cared about multimedia .
KDE is an ok desktop .
I honestly do n't even think it is as good as Windows 7 .
All KDE is a Desktop shell , control set , and some apps , like Windows Explorer and USER and Notepad , and one that took too long to write and still has no tools .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KDE is not Amiga.
When you first saw an Amiga running Deluxe Paint or any of the other things that it could do when it first came out, it was a life changing experience if you cared about multimedia.
KDE is an ok desktop.
I honestly don't even think it is as good as Windows 7.
All KDE is a Desktop shell, control set, and some apps, like Windows Explorer and USER and Notepad, and one that took too long to write and still has no tools.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231542</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235380</id>
	<title>Re:The sweet stink of rebranding!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259234640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>borland =&gt; inprise ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>borland = &gt; inprise ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>borland =&gt; inprise ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176</id>
	<title>Wrods for mare mortals</title>
	<author>future assassin</author>
	<datestamp>1257160800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is is hard to get together over a few beers and come up with a catchy names that everyday joe and jane will remember. Plasma? My mom would be like WTF is PLASMA. When she needed to edit some photos I got her to download GIMP. You know know what she said... Only after I explained to her what is was did she kinda accept the name.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is is hard to get together over a few beers and come up with a catchy names that everyday joe and jane will remember .
Plasma ? My mom would be like WTF is PLASMA .
When she needed to edit some photos I got her to download GIMP .
You know know what she said... Only after I explained to her what is was did she kinda accept the name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is is hard to get together over a few beers and come up with a catchy names that everyday joe and jane will remember.
Plasma? My mom would be like WTF is PLASMA.
When she needed to edit some photos I got her to download GIMP.
You know know what she said... Only after I explained to her what is was did she kinda accept the name.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231108</id>
	<title>K?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257160020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought the K stood for Krap. Serious users use a shell or Gnome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the K stood for Krap .
Serious users use a shell or Gnome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the K stood for Krap.
Serious users use a shell or Gnome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231518</id>
	<title>Re:the triumph of buzzwords!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257162720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now to be fair, "plasma" is the name of KDE4's new widgets engine (and widgets include everything from panels to "applets" to the desktop, in line with KDE's extensible/customisable SOP). It's not as if the term "plasma" has nothing to do with their product (arguably picking "plasma" as a name for their widget engine was a marketdroid-ish thing to do in the first place - but still preferable to "KDE Kwidgets Kengine").</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now to be fair , " plasma " is the name of KDE4 's new widgets engine ( and widgets include everything from panels to " applets " to the desktop , in line with KDE 's extensible/customisable SOP ) .
It 's not as if the term " plasma " has nothing to do with their product ( arguably picking " plasma " as a name for their widget engine was a marketdroid-ish thing to do in the first place - but still preferable to " KDE Kwidgets Kengine " ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now to be fair, "plasma" is the name of KDE4's new widgets engine (and widgets include everything from panels to "applets" to the desktop, in line with KDE's extensible/customisable SOP).
It's not as if the term "plasma" has nothing to do with their product (arguably picking "plasma" as a name for their widget engine was a marketdroid-ish thing to do in the first place - but still preferable to "KDE Kwidgets Kengine").</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231144</id>
	<title>Waste of time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257160440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ubuntu manga and now this crap? People think I stay away from Ubuntu and KDE because they're mainstream. Actually, I stay away from them because they focus too much on superfluous crap like this.</p><p>Spend more time writing good software than re-branding it and wasting resources trying to sell it off to everyone in the world.</p><p>This is why (in the future) we can't have nice things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ubuntu manga and now this crap ?
People think I stay away from Ubuntu and KDE because they 're mainstream .
Actually , I stay away from them because they focus too much on superfluous crap like this.Spend more time writing good software than re-branding it and wasting resources trying to sell it off to everyone in the world.This is why ( in the future ) we ca n't have nice things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ubuntu manga and now this crap?
People think I stay away from Ubuntu and KDE because they're mainstream.
Actually, I stay away from them because they focus too much on superfluous crap like this.Spend more time writing good software than re-branding it and wasting resources trying to sell it off to everyone in the world.This is why (in the future) we can't have nice things.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235584</id>
	<title>Re:The sweet stink of rebranding!</title>
	<author>ledow</author>
	<datestamp>1259236740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree, rebranding is an exercise in management of boredom (and trying to sweep bad reputations under the carpet), not anything practical or useful.  Does "Nick the Plumber", small-time business man need to rebrand every few years?  No.  Does IBM or Microsoft or other large companies?  No.  Rebranding on mergers / takeovers, I can sort of understand that, but even when Santander took over a lot of UK banks, they were smart enough to keep the original names and start a *very* *very* slow transition to introduce the Santander name in the UK (which was unheard of).</p><p>Marathon -&gt; Snickers (I will never forgive them)<br>Opal Fruits -&gt; Starburst (I still ask for these in shops and people always know what I'm talking about).</p><p>Rebranding is a waste of time and money in order to confuse your existing customers and keep them asking for your previous name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , rebranding is an exercise in management of boredom ( and trying to sweep bad reputations under the carpet ) , not anything practical or useful .
Does " Nick the Plumber " , small-time business man need to rebrand every few years ?
No. Does IBM or Microsoft or other large companies ?
No. Rebranding on mergers / takeovers , I can sort of understand that , but even when Santander took over a lot of UK banks , they were smart enough to keep the original names and start a * very * * very * slow transition to introduce the Santander name in the UK ( which was unheard of ) .Marathon - &gt; Snickers ( I will never forgive them ) Opal Fruits - &gt; Starburst ( I still ask for these in shops and people always know what I 'm talking about ) .Rebranding is a waste of time and money in order to confuse your existing customers and keep them asking for your previous name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, rebranding is an exercise in management of boredom (and trying to sweep bad reputations under the carpet), not anything practical or useful.
Does "Nick the Plumber", small-time business man need to rebrand every few years?
No.  Does IBM or Microsoft or other large companies?
No.  Rebranding on mergers / takeovers, I can sort of understand that, but even when Santander took over a lot of UK banks, they were smart enough to keep the original names and start a *very* *very* slow transition to introduce the Santander name in the UK (which was unheard of).Marathon -&gt; Snickers (I will never forgive them)Opal Fruits -&gt; Starburst (I still ask for these in shops and people always know what I'm talking about).Rebranding is a waste of time and money in order to confuse your existing customers and keep them asking for your previous name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234782</id>
	<title>Re:3.5</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259227140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>KDE folks:  revert to 3.5 while you still have a user base.</p></div><p>When's the last time you used a 4.X release? We all admit that releasing 4.0 as 4.0 and not a beta was a mistake, but since 4.2 the experience has been fantastic.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>KDE folks : revert to 3.5 while you still have a user base.When 's the last time you used a 4.X release ?
We all admit that releasing 4.0 as 4.0 and not a beta was a mistake , but since 4.2 the experience has been fantastic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KDE folks:  revert to 3.5 while you still have a user base.When's the last time you used a 4.X release?
We all admit that releasing 4.0 as 4.0 and not a beta was a mistake, but since 4.2 the experience has been fantastic.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30236544</id>
	<title>Sounds like they took sun's advice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259247600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems like they are taking the same horrifying road that Sun took when they decided to start their Java enterprise platforms</p><p>JPE<br>J2EE 1.2<br>J2EE 1.3<br>J2EE 1.4<br>Java EE 5<br>Java EE 6</p><p>and god knows which JDK goes with each of these...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems like they are taking the same horrifying road that Sun took when they decided to start their Java enterprise platformsJPEJ2EE 1.2J2EE 1.3J2EE 1.4Java EE 5Java EE 6and god knows which JDK goes with each of these.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems like they are taking the same horrifying road that Sun took when they decided to start their Java enterprise platformsJPEJ2EE 1.2J2EE 1.3J2EE 1.4Java EE 5Java EE 6and god knows which JDK goes with each of these...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232226</id>
	<title>Re:Wrods for mare mortals</title>
	<author>icebraining</author>
	<datestamp>1257168540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can always use Awesome, whose name describes the software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can always use Awesome , whose name describes the software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can always use Awesome, whose name describes the software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231320</id>
	<title>I want</title>
	<author>Saija</author>
	<datestamp>1257161640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>my Plasma <a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/3993" title="linuxjournal.com">Wristwatch</a> [linuxjournal.com], or KDE Plasma Wristwatch:<p><div class="quote"><p> <b>KDE Workspace</b> <br>
KDE provides workspaces. These provide the environment for running and managing applications and integrate interaction of applications. The workspaces are designed as generic environment for all kinds of desktop applications, not only applications built on the KDE Platform. They integrate best with applications following the standards used by the KDE Platform. There are different flavors of the workspace to address the needs of specific groups of users or adapt to specific hardware platforms:
</p><ul>
    <li>Plasma Desktop or KDE Plasma Desktop. This is the workspace for desktop computers. It's built on the classical paradigm of a desktop environment.</li>
    <li>Plasma Netbook or KDE Plasma Netbook. This is the workspace for computers with a small display, e.g. Netbooks.</li>
    <li> <b>Future KDE workspaces tailored to specific devices will follow a similar naming scheme</b>
</li></ul> </div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>my Plasma Wristwatch [ linuxjournal.com ] , or KDE Plasma Wristwatch : KDE Workspace KDE provides workspaces .
These provide the environment for running and managing applications and integrate interaction of applications .
The workspaces are designed as generic environment for all kinds of desktop applications , not only applications built on the KDE Platform .
They integrate best with applications following the standards used by the KDE Platform .
There are different flavors of the workspace to address the needs of specific groups of users or adapt to specific hardware platforms : Plasma Desktop or KDE Plasma Desktop .
This is the workspace for desktop computers .
It 's built on the classical paradigm of a desktop environment .
Plasma Netbook or KDE Plasma Netbook .
This is the workspace for computers with a small display , e.g .
Netbooks . Future KDE workspaces tailored to specific devices will follow a similar naming scheme</tokentext>
<sentencetext>my Plasma Wristwatch [linuxjournal.com], or KDE Plasma Wristwatch: KDE Workspace 
KDE provides workspaces.
These provide the environment for running and managing applications and integrate interaction of applications.
The workspaces are designed as generic environment for all kinds of desktop applications, not only applications built on the KDE Platform.
They integrate best with applications following the standards used by the KDE Platform.
There are different flavors of the workspace to address the needs of specific groups of users or adapt to specific hardware platforms:

    Plasma Desktop or KDE Plasma Desktop.
This is the workspace for desktop computers.
It's built on the classical paradigm of a desktop environment.
Plasma Netbook or KDE Plasma Netbook.
This is the workspace for computers with a small display, e.g.
Netbooks.
     Future KDE workspaces tailored to specific devices will follow a similar naming scheme
 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231224</id>
	<title>Re:Clarity?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257161040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Thanks, <em>Klarity Kommittee!</em> </p></div><p>There, fixed that for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks , Klarity Kommittee !
There , fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks, Klarity Kommittee!
There, fixed that for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233232</id>
	<title>Re:Wrods for mare mortals</title>
	<author>Draek</author>
	<datestamp>1257176640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Prove it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Prove it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Prove it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234218</id>
	<title>Windoze lovin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257188040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess Gnome is still the free alternative, like it always was.</p><p>Could we please stop sucking up to Micro$oft?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess Gnome is still the free alternative , like it always was.Could we please stop sucking up to Micro $ oft ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess Gnome is still the free alternative, like it always was.Could we please stop sucking up to Micro$oft?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232350</id>
	<title>KDE plasma netbook? Netbook is copyrighted</title>
	<author>stevew</author>
	<datestamp>1257169380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great move - now you guys are going to have the Copyright Police after you!</p><p>The term "Netbook" is copyrighted by Psion Teklogix,... just ask them, they'll tell you!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>Why would you choose a term that is already means a piece of hardware, and is copyrighted already to boot??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great move - now you guys are going to have the Copyright Police after you ! The term " Netbook " is copyrighted by Psion Teklogix,... just ask them , they 'll tell you !
; - ) Why would you choose a term that is already means a piece of hardware , and is copyrighted already to boot ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great move - now you guys are going to have the Copyright Police after you!The term "Netbook" is copyrighted by Psion Teklogix,... just ask them, they'll tell you!
;-)Why would you choose a term that is already means a piece of hardware, and is copyrighted already to boot?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234918</id>
	<title>Re:Wrods for mare mortals</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259229360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Two words: Pooh Bear</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Two words : Pooh Bear</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two words: Pooh Bear</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231892</id>
	<title>Re:SYNERGY!</title>
	<author>conteXXt</author>
	<datestamp>1257166200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>synergy(the software,  NOT the buzzword) is awesome.  I hope it never gets renamed to something I won't be able to find down the road.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>synergy ( the software , NOT the buzzword ) is awesome .
I hope it never gets renamed to something I wo n't be able to find down the road .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>synergy(the software,  NOT the buzzword) is awesome.
I hope it never gets renamed to something I won't be able to find down the road.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231424</id>
	<title>Re:K?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257162240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, you have it backwards, as the summary states, the K in KDE is for Kool, as in Kio slave.   Where as the G in Gnome stands for Garbage as in GTK.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , you have it backwards , as the summary states , the K in KDE is for Kool , as in Kio slave .
Where as the G in Gnome stands for Garbage as in GTK .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, you have it backwards, as the summary states, the K in KDE is for Kool, as in Kio slave.
Where as the G in Gnome stands for Garbage as in GTK.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234306</id>
	<title>Re:The sweet stink of rebranding!</title>
	<author>anethema</author>
	<datestamp>1257189180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&lt;quote&gt;<br>&lt;li&gt;Toothpaste. Now was that Crest Tartar Control plus Whitening, or Crest Whitening plus Tartar Control? And did you want that in paste or gel? I swear, we need meta-toothpaste, where it's formulated on the spot. You have a big board with all sorts of shit like "mint," "sparkly" (for the child or man-child in your household), "tartar control," and buzzword of the year, "whitening." Then you push a whole bunch and hit the &lt;b&gt;MIX&lt;/b&gt; button, and get a toothpaste tube with all that shit custom-made. It'd be like ordering an HP server; it'd even warn you about compatibility issues! But I digress.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/quote&gt;<br><br>That is actually a great idea. Some machine in Walmart, big Crest logo. Pick your flavour, features, gel/paste, etc. Give it a name and it mixes it, puts it into a tube, prints your name on there, and you're done! You should probably patent the idea, I'm pretty sure it's marketable.</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Toothpaste .
Now was that Crest Tartar Control plus Whitening , or Crest Whitening plus Tartar Control ?
And did you want that in paste or gel ?
I swear , we need meta-toothpaste , where it 's formulated on the spot .
You have a big board with all sorts of shit like " mint , " " sparkly " ( for the child or man-child in your household ) , " tartar control , " and buzzword of the year , " whitening .
" Then you push a whole bunch and hit the MIX button , and get a toothpaste tube with all that shit custom-made .
It 'd be like ordering an HP server ; it 'd even warn you about compatibility issues !
But I digress.That is actually a great idea .
Some machine in Walmart , big Crest logo .
Pick your flavour , features , gel/paste , etc .
Give it a name and it mixes it , puts it into a tube , prints your name on there , and you 're done !
You should probably patent the idea , I 'm pretty sure it 's marketable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Toothpaste.
Now was that Crest Tartar Control plus Whitening, or Crest Whitening plus Tartar Control?
And did you want that in paste or gel?
I swear, we need meta-toothpaste, where it's formulated on the spot.
You have a big board with all sorts of shit like "mint," "sparkly" (for the child or man-child in your household), "tartar control," and buzzword of the year, "whitening.
" Then you push a whole bunch and hit the MIX button, and get a toothpaste tube with all that shit custom-made.
It'd be like ordering an HP server; it'd even warn you about compatibility issues!
But I digress.That is actually a great idea.
Some machine in Walmart, big Crest logo.
Pick your flavour, features, gel/paste, etc.
Give it a name and it mixes it, puts it into a tube, prints your name on there, and you're done!
You should probably patent the idea, I'm pretty sure it's marketable.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233984</id>
	<title>Re:Wrods for mare mortals</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257185220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those are <i>cool names.  Can you grasp that concept?  No, I don't think you can. That's the problem with people like you, and it's why you <b>don't</b> get it.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those are cool names .
Can you grasp that concept ?
No , I do n't think you can .
That 's the problem with people like you , and it 's why you do n't get it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those are cool names.
Can you grasp that concept?
No, I don't think you can.
That's the problem with people like you, and it's why you don't get it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234266</id>
	<title>Re:3.5</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1257188880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At this point it's way too late already. They've pulled a Vista with 4.x, now they either make it into 7 eventually (and no, 4.3 is still not it - way too unstable - at best it's SP3), or die.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At this point it 's way too late already .
They 've pulled a Vista with 4.x , now they either make it into 7 eventually ( and no , 4.3 is still not it - way too unstable - at best it 's SP3 ) , or die .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At this point it's way too late already.
They've pulled a Vista with 4.x, now they either make it into 7 eventually (and no, 4.3 is still not it - way too unstable - at best it's SP3), or die.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232130</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid</title>
	<author>socceroos</author>
	<datestamp>1257168060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Almost. They <i>do</i> have this really cool technology, there <i>are</i> glaring deficiencies but their marketing department <b>isn't</b> clueless. Go read the article, look at the diagrams and think it through. This move on their part makes complete sense and only makes official what has been unofficial for many years. Plus, by using their new scheme it removes some of the confusion around where and how KDE software works.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Almost .
They do have this really cool technology , there are glaring deficiencies but their marketing department is n't clueless .
Go read the article , look at the diagrams and think it through .
This move on their part makes complete sense and only makes official what has been unofficial for many years .
Plus , by using their new scheme it removes some of the confusion around where and how KDE software works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Almost.
They do have this really cool technology, there are glaring deficiencies but their marketing department isn't clueless.
Go read the article, look at the diagrams and think it through.
This move on their part makes complete sense and only makes official what has been unofficial for many years.
Plus, by using their new scheme it removes some of the confusion around where and how KDE software works.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231542</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233100</id>
	<title>Re:Waste of time</title>
	<author>sowth</author>
	<datestamp>1257175260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF is up with people who insist everyone should only use "mainstream" products? (Usually crap products which don't  work.) Then anyone who doesn't, they say is trying to be a rebel and supposedly "looking stupid" or somesuch. Apparently they are totally self-absorbed and think everyone is a clone of them, and anyone who acts differently is making a lame attempt "to stand out."

</p><p>Apparently using things and doing actions which suit me is some sort of threat to their fantasy world.

</p><p>But then they lust after things for the rich, which are not mainstream and they could never afford, which causes them to try and live way beyond their means, and it is supposed to be normal behavior.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF is up with people who insist everyone should only use " mainstream " products ?
( Usually crap products which do n't work .
) Then anyone who does n't , they say is trying to be a rebel and supposedly " looking stupid " or somesuch .
Apparently they are totally self-absorbed and think everyone is a clone of them , and anyone who acts differently is making a lame attempt " to stand out .
" Apparently using things and doing actions which suit me is some sort of threat to their fantasy world .
But then they lust after things for the rich , which are not mainstream and they could never afford , which causes them to try and live way beyond their means , and it is supposed to be normal behavior .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF is up with people who insist everyone should only use "mainstream" products?
(Usually crap products which don't  work.
) Then anyone who doesn't, they say is trying to be a rebel and supposedly "looking stupid" or somesuch.
Apparently they are totally self-absorbed and think everyone is a clone of them, and anyone who acts differently is making a lame attempt "to stand out.
"

Apparently using things and doing actions which suit me is some sort of threat to their fantasy world.
But then they lust after things for the rich, which are not mainstream and they could never afford, which causes them to try and live way beyond their means, and it is supposed to be normal behavior.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231174</id>
	<title>Re:SYNERGY!</title>
	<author>MrEricSir</author>
	<datestamp>1257160800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No they don't, you can install the synergy package yourself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No they do n't , you can install the synergy package yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No they don't, you can install the synergy package yourself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30237906</id>
	<title>Re:Wrods for mare mortals</title>
	<author>arose</author>
	<datestamp>1259258220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>'Shop' in English is pronounced quite close to 'ass' in Russian? Guess the name of a widely pirated and professionally used photo editing software in Russia.</htmltext>
<tokenext>'Shop ' in English is pronounced quite close to 'ass ' in Russian ?
Guess the name of a widely pirated and professionally used photo editing software in Russia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Shop' in English is pronounced quite close to 'ass' in Russian?
Guess the name of a widely pirated and professionally used photo editing software in Russia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270</id>
	<title>Re:Wrods for mare mortals</title>
	<author>kjart</author>
	<datestamp>1257168780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've got news for you - no amount of marketing money would make a name like GIMP gain wide acceptance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got news for you - no amount of marketing money would make a name like GIMP gain wide acceptance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got news for you - no amount of marketing money would make a name like GIMP gain wide acceptance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232202</id>
	<title>Re:Wrods for mare mortals</title>
	<author>wd5gnr</author>
	<datestamp>1257168480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My mom never says WTF. Well. Almost never.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My mom never says WTF .
Well. Almost never .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My mom never says WTF.
Well. Almost never.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231188</id>
	<title>XFCE</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1257160860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>X fecce is awesome.  Crap name though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>X fecce is awesome .
Crap name though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>X fecce is awesome.
Crap name though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30238788</id>
	<title>Re:3.5</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259265000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>KDE3.5 is like me old apartment. It was nice while it lasted, but it was a one roomed rental, had a bad kitchen and was on the ground flood in a bad neighborhood.</p><p>KDE4.3 is like me new apartment. It not just nice it's a big two roomed apartment, had a large kitchen and is on the second floor in the middle of our capital. And the best part is, that it's my apartment.</p><p>I loved my old apartment but I wouldn't go back after I've gotten used to my new one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>KDE3.5 is like me old apartment .
It was nice while it lasted , but it was a one roomed rental , had a bad kitchen and was on the ground flood in a bad neighborhood.KDE4.3 is like me new apartment .
It not just nice it 's a big two roomed apartment , had a large kitchen and is on the second floor in the middle of our capital .
And the best part is , that it 's my apartment.I loved my old apartment but I would n't go back after I 've gotten used to my new one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KDE3.5 is like me old apartment.
It was nice while it lasted, but it was a one roomed rental, had a bad kitchen and was on the ground flood in a bad neighborhood.KDE4.3 is like me new apartment.
It not just nice it's a big two roomed apartment, had a large kitchen and is on the second floor in the middle of our capital.
And the best part is, that it's my apartment.I loved my old apartment but I wouldn't go back after I've gotten used to my new one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232664</id>
	<title>Re:Wrods for mare mortals</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257171900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and most importantly, WTF is WTF????</htmltext>
<tokenext>and most importantly , WTF is WTF ? ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and most importantly, WTF is WTF???
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30236542</id>
	<title>Re:Wrods for mare mortals</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259247600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF is WTF?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF is WTF ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF is WTF?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235508</id>
	<title>Re:I want</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1259236020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So KDE Plasma Desktop is a DE what uses PDE Plasma kwin as a window manager to display KDE Plasma Plasma widgets and KDE Plasma applications (and, of course, KDE Plasma GNOME applications, too) on my KDE Plasma Computer...<br>
<br>
Now when will the new version of Amarokde Plasma be out?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So KDE Plasma Desktop is a DE what uses PDE Plasma kwin as a window manager to display KDE Plasma Plasma widgets and KDE Plasma applications ( and , of course , KDE Plasma GNOME applications , too ) on my KDE Plasma Computer.. . Now when will the new version of Amarokde Plasma be out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So KDE Plasma Desktop is a DE what uses PDE Plasma kwin as a window manager to display KDE Plasma Plasma widgets and KDE Plasma applications (and, of course, KDE Plasma GNOME applications, too) on my KDE Plasma Computer...

Now when will the new version of Amarokde Plasma be out?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232468</id>
	<title>Krikey!</title>
	<author>RoboRay</author>
	<datestamp>1257170160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this means they're going to stop using kwirky misspellings of various words for the names of every program, I might actually be konvinced to start taking them seriously.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this means they 're going to stop using kwirky misspellings of various words for the names of every program , I might actually be konvinced to start taking them seriously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this means they're going to stop using kwirky misspellings of various words for the names of every program, I might actually be konvinced to start taking them seriously.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234898</id>
	<title>Re:Rods for mortal mares</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259229180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I heard that very comment in 1998 when I first tried a search engine with a clean, white interface and no annoying "portal" widgets.</p><p>I understand they did fairly well, even though they spent next to nothing on marketing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard that very comment in 1998 when I first tried a search engine with a clean , white interface and no annoying " portal " widgets.I understand they did fairly well , even though they spent next to nothing on marketing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard that very comment in 1998 when I first tried a search engine with a clean, white interface and no annoying "portal" widgets.I understand they did fairly well, even though they spent next to nothing on marketing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231090</id>
	<title>Frist Ps0T</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257159900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30237906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30238788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231752
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231230
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30240926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232512
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232406
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234898
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30236542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30254144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30236350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30238518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30244276
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232354
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231892
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_2132204_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231080
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231208
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231424
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231518
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231788
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232350
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235508
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30254144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234266
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30244276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30238788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234972
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30236350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235380
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30240926
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231072
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235788
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231276
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30238518
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231294
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231094
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231224
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231422
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231436
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231752
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231252
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231640
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231536
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232130
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231568
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233984
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30236542
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232270
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234898
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233810
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234918
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235428
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233004
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30237906
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30234292
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30235220
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233232
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232664
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232202
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233088
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231128
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231174
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233376
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231892
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30232496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30233830
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_2132204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_2132204.30231188
</commentlist>
</conversation>
