<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_25_187249</id>
	<title>Australian Govt. Proposes Internet "Panic Button" For Kids</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1259173320000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>CuteSteveJobs writes <i>"Children who feel they are being bullied, harassed or groomed online could call for help instantly using <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/panic-button-plan-to-beat-cyberpredators-20091125-jr1k.html">a 'panic button' on their PCs</a> under a plan by the Australian Government's cyber-safety working group. The button shall look like a 'friendly dolphin,' who will connect the child victim instantly to police or child protection groups. Australian Internet Censorship Advocate Hetty <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/06/02/hetty-johnston-henson-debate-a-healthy-sign/">'Save the Children'</a> Johnson says the Internet needs something like 000 or 911.  Will this be another scheme wasting taxpayer dollars in lieu of parental supervison, or could it actually work? Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet? Can flaming and trolling be classified as bullying?"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>CuteSteveJobs writes " Children who feel they are being bullied , harassed or groomed online could call for help instantly using a 'panic button ' on their PCs under a plan by the Australian Government 's cyber-safety working group .
The button shall look like a 'friendly dolphin, ' who will connect the child victim instantly to police or child protection groups .
Australian Internet Censorship Advocate Hetty 'Save the Children ' Johnson says the Internet needs something like 000 or 911 .
Will this be another scheme wasting taxpayer dollars in lieu of parental supervison , or could it actually work ?
Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet ?
Can flaming and trolling be classified as bullying ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CuteSteveJobs writes "Children who feel they are being bullied, harassed or groomed online could call for help instantly using a 'panic button' on their PCs under a plan by the Australian Government's cyber-safety working group.
The button shall look like a 'friendly dolphin,' who will connect the child victim instantly to police or child protection groups.
Australian Internet Censorship Advocate Hetty 'Save the Children' Johnson says the Internet needs something like 000 or 911.
Will this be another scheme wasting taxpayer dollars in lieu of parental supervison, or could it actually work?
Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet?
Can flaming and trolling be classified as bullying?
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231262</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>Sasayaki</author>
	<datestamp>1257161340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The answer to this is simple. (disclaimer: I'm not a politician but I am interested in politics)</p><p>In Australia (much like in other democracies such as America) we have a senate which ultimately writes, discusses and publishes new laws. Instead of directly voting for our Prime Minister (you guys would say President), we instead vote in senate members in our electorates (or 'regional areas'). Since Australia's quite large, these regional areas might cover a fairly large areas including a small city and a few towns.</p><p>Australia, much like America, has two main political parties- the Labour party (left leaning) and the Liberal party (right leaning). These two parties get most of the seats. However, because senate members vote on laws, sometimes minority parties or independents gain seats.</p><p>There are currently 76 seats in the senate. What this means is, in simplified terms, if the Labour party has 38 seats and the Liberal party has 37 seats, then the one remaining seat (held by an independent or a member of an minority party) holds what is called the 'balance of power'. After all, they could just vote against or for any law proposed by the government and block it- 38 vs 38 is a tie, which means the bill is defeated. So, essentially, this person has the power to veto any law they choose... a very powerful position. They cannot *create* new laws directly, but they get the final say as to what passes.</p><p>Currently, senator Fielding holds the balance of power in the Australian senate. Senator Fielding is from the state of Victoria and is affiliated with a political party called 'Family First', which is exactly what it says on the tin- immediately love for any scheme which is 'for the children at any cost'. That's why all these insane "For the Children!" laws are getting passed- because politicians on all sides of politics want to scratch his back so that he'll pass or block their various laws of choice. Couple this with a profound lack of understanding regarding the Intertubes, a Telecommunications minister who has a massive, visible erection for Internet censorship (who is by far the most hated minister in his field in living memory) and you have a recipe for massive "For the Children" wankery.</p><p>I hope I've explained everything in an easy to understand manner. It's not that Australians are douchebags or that our politicians are all insane, it's just a minor broken bit in what is otherwise a perfectly fine system- a unique race condition which manifests itself regularly but is remarkably damaging when it does.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The answer to this is simple .
( disclaimer : I 'm not a politician but I am interested in politics ) In Australia ( much like in other democracies such as America ) we have a senate which ultimately writes , discusses and publishes new laws .
Instead of directly voting for our Prime Minister ( you guys would say President ) , we instead vote in senate members in our electorates ( or 'regional areas ' ) .
Since Australia 's quite large , these regional areas might cover a fairly large areas including a small city and a few towns.Australia , much like America , has two main political parties- the Labour party ( left leaning ) and the Liberal party ( right leaning ) .
These two parties get most of the seats .
However , because senate members vote on laws , sometimes minority parties or independents gain seats.There are currently 76 seats in the senate .
What this means is , in simplified terms , if the Labour party has 38 seats and the Liberal party has 37 seats , then the one remaining seat ( held by an independent or a member of an minority party ) holds what is called the 'balance of power' .
After all , they could just vote against or for any law proposed by the government and block it- 38 vs 38 is a tie , which means the bill is defeated .
So , essentially , this person has the power to veto any law they choose... a very powerful position .
They can not * create * new laws directly , but they get the final say as to what passes.Currently , senator Fielding holds the balance of power in the Australian senate .
Senator Fielding is from the state of Victoria and is affiliated with a political party called 'Family First ' , which is exactly what it says on the tin- immediately love for any scheme which is 'for the children at any cost' .
That 's why all these insane " For the Children !
" laws are getting passed- because politicians on all sides of politics want to scratch his back so that he 'll pass or block their various laws of choice .
Couple this with a profound lack of understanding regarding the Intertubes , a Telecommunications minister who has a massive , visible erection for Internet censorship ( who is by far the most hated minister in his field in living memory ) and you have a recipe for massive " For the Children " wankery.I hope I 've explained everything in an easy to understand manner .
It 's not that Australians are douchebags or that our politicians are all insane , it 's just a minor broken bit in what is otherwise a perfectly fine system- a unique race condition which manifests itself regularly but is remarkably damaging when it does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The answer to this is simple.
(disclaimer: I'm not a politician but I am interested in politics)In Australia (much like in other democracies such as America) we have a senate which ultimately writes, discusses and publishes new laws.
Instead of directly voting for our Prime Minister (you guys would say President), we instead vote in senate members in our electorates (or 'regional areas').
Since Australia's quite large, these regional areas might cover a fairly large areas including a small city and a few towns.Australia, much like America, has two main political parties- the Labour party (left leaning) and the Liberal party (right leaning).
These two parties get most of the seats.
However, because senate members vote on laws, sometimes minority parties or independents gain seats.There are currently 76 seats in the senate.
What this means is, in simplified terms, if the Labour party has 38 seats and the Liberal party has 37 seats, then the one remaining seat (held by an independent or a member of an minority party) holds what is called the 'balance of power'.
After all, they could just vote against or for any law proposed by the government and block it- 38 vs 38 is a tie, which means the bill is defeated.
So, essentially, this person has the power to veto any law they choose... a very powerful position.
They cannot *create* new laws directly, but they get the final say as to what passes.Currently, senator Fielding holds the balance of power in the Australian senate.
Senator Fielding is from the state of Victoria and is affiliated with a political party called 'Family First', which is exactly what it says on the tin- immediately love for any scheme which is 'for the children at any cost'.
That's why all these insane "For the Children!
" laws are getting passed- because politicians on all sides of politics want to scratch his back so that he'll pass or block their various laws of choice.
Couple this with a profound lack of understanding regarding the Intertubes, a Telecommunications minister who has a massive, visible erection for Internet censorship (who is by far the most hated minister in his field in living memory) and you have a recipe for massive "For the Children" wankery.I hope I've explained everything in an easy to understand manner.
It's not that Australians are douchebags or that our politicians are all insane, it's just a minor broken bit in what is otherwise a perfectly fine system- a unique race condition which manifests itself regularly but is remarkably damaging when it does.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228918</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet is not Real Life</title>
	<author>getNewNickName</author>
	<datestamp>1257191400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You say it's easy to just turn off your computer to "escape" from the internet, but that's like saying that you can easily escape from physical bullying by staying locked up in your house.  We're not even talking about pedophiles here, just kids bullying other kids.  Cyber harassment is a real problem.  The anonymity of the Internet makes things worse; at least in the physical world you can see who your bullies are.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You say it 's easy to just turn off your computer to " escape " from the internet , but that 's like saying that you can easily escape from physical bullying by staying locked up in your house .
We 're not even talking about pedophiles here , just kids bullying other kids .
Cyber harassment is a real problem .
The anonymity of the Internet makes things worse ; at least in the physical world you can see who your bullies are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You say it's easy to just turn off your computer to "escape" from the internet, but that's like saying that you can easily escape from physical bullying by staying locked up in your house.
We're not even talking about pedophiles here, just kids bullying other kids.
Cyber harassment is a real problem.
The anonymity of the Internet makes things worse; at least in the physical world you can see who your bullies are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229844</id>
	<title>Both</title>
	<author>RAMMS+EIN</author>
	<datestamp>1257152520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>``Will this be another scheme wasting taxpayer dollars in lieu of parental supervison''</p><p>Yes.</p><p>``or could it actually work?''</p><p>Yes. They will claim "5 fantasillion emergency calls per month! The system is a great success!"</p><p>And then they will write in their re-election programme "Passed legislation that enhanced the safety of children."</p><p>And the suppliers of the technology will make money.</p><p>And that's all the proposal is meant to accomplish.</p><p>Perhaps, as a nice bonus, parents will feel the safety of their children has improved, too.</p><p>Real safety matters only in the mind of a small minority.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>` ` Will this be another scheme wasting taxpayer dollars in lieu of parental supervison''Yes. ` ` or could it actually work ? ''Yes .
They will claim " 5 fantasillion emergency calls per month !
The system is a great success !
" And then they will write in their re-election programme " Passed legislation that enhanced the safety of children .
" And the suppliers of the technology will make money.And that 's all the proposal is meant to accomplish.Perhaps , as a nice bonus , parents will feel the safety of their children has improved , too.Real safety matters only in the mind of a small minority .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>``Will this be another scheme wasting taxpayer dollars in lieu of parental supervison''Yes.``or could it actually work?''Yes.
They will claim "5 fantasillion emergency calls per month!
The system is a great success!
"And then they will write in their re-election programme "Passed legislation that enhanced the safety of children.
"And the suppliers of the technology will make money.And that's all the proposal is meant to accomplish.Perhaps, as a nice bonus, parents will feel the safety of their children has improved, too.Real safety matters only in the mind of a small minority.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229378</id>
	<title>Already have one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257193440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My computer already has a button to push if I'm being harassed in a chat room. It's a 'X' button in the top-right corner of the window. In the pre-GUI days, "/leave", and in more extreme cases, "/quit" also did the job.</p><p>Now, if I was worried about being physically assaulted while using my computer, I'd simply have to install a hold-up kick-switch under my desk, like in banks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My computer already has a button to push if I 'm being harassed in a chat room .
It 's a 'X ' button in the top-right corner of the window .
In the pre-GUI days , " /leave " , and in more extreme cases , " /quit " also did the job.Now , if I was worried about being physically assaulted while using my computer , I 'd simply have to install a hold-up kick-switch under my desk , like in banks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My computer already has a button to push if I'm being harassed in a chat room.
It's a 'X' button in the top-right corner of the window.
In the pre-GUI days, "/leave", and in more extreme cases, "/quit" also did the job.Now, if I was worried about being physically assaulted while using my computer, I'd simply have to install a hold-up kick-switch under my desk, like in banks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230938</id>
	<title>A better idea would be to...</title>
	<author>moozh84</author>
	<datestamp>1257158880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only true danger for kids on the Internet is if they get tricked by child predators into meeting in real life.  A "panic button" does nothing in that case, since the child does not think he/she is in danger.

Here's a better way to spend tax money to protection children on the Internet:

Pay a software company to develop a good, free "Net Nanny"-style software program and make it available for everyone to use.

The market for software like that has always been weak, since most parents don't care enough about protecting their kids from the Internet to actually want to spend money and time buying and configuring the software.  Part of the reason is because the software is not known to be very good.  Government spending could keep software like that universally compatible with all major OSes, browsers, etc., with a very good matching algorithm or a database on which sites are safe and which aren't.  And it could be a free download from your government's website.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only true danger for kids on the Internet is if they get tricked by child predators into meeting in real life .
A " panic button " does nothing in that case , since the child does not think he/she is in danger .
Here 's a better way to spend tax money to protection children on the Internet : Pay a software company to develop a good , free " Net Nanny " -style software program and make it available for everyone to use .
The market for software like that has always been weak , since most parents do n't care enough about protecting their kids from the Internet to actually want to spend money and time buying and configuring the software .
Part of the reason is because the software is not known to be very good .
Government spending could keep software like that universally compatible with all major OSes , browsers , etc. , with a very good matching algorithm or a database on which sites are safe and which are n't .
And it could be a free download from your government 's website .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only true danger for kids on the Internet is if they get tricked by child predators into meeting in real life.
A "panic button" does nothing in that case, since the child does not think he/she is in danger.
Here's a better way to spend tax money to protection children on the Internet:

Pay a software company to develop a good, free "Net Nanny"-style software program and make it available for everyone to use.
The market for software like that has always been weak, since most parents don't care enough about protecting their kids from the Internet to actually want to spend money and time buying and configuring the software.
Part of the reason is because the software is not known to be very good.
Government spending could keep software like that universally compatible with all major OSes, browsers, etc., with a very good matching algorithm or a database on which sites are safe and which aren't.
And it could be a free download from your government's website.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228974</id>
	<title>Got that in Norway</title>
	<author>akselsm</author>
	<datestamp>1257191640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here in Norway, the police is present, and has a big, red "POLITI" button on Facebook, Twitter as well as in Windows Live Messenger, and on Norwegian social networks (biip.no, nettby.no). The button is linked to a chat service with officers from Kripos (National Crime Unit). Apparently, children have reported abuse (violence by parents) as well as bullying, enabling Social Services to react.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here in Norway , the police is present , and has a big , red " POLITI " button on Facebook , Twitter as well as in Windows Live Messenger , and on Norwegian social networks ( biip.no , nettby.no ) .
The button is linked to a chat service with officers from Kripos ( National Crime Unit ) .
Apparently , children have reported abuse ( violence by parents ) as well as bullying , enabling Social Services to react .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here in Norway, the police is present, and has a big, red "POLITI" button on Facebook, Twitter as well as in Windows Live Messenger, and on Norwegian social networks (biip.no, nettby.no).
The button is linked to a chat service with officers from Kripos (National Crime Unit).
Apparently, children have reported abuse (violence by parents) as well as bullying, enabling Social Services to react.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232220</id>
	<title>Of course...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257168540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course flaming and trolling are bullying.  It's not a question, we've seen how bad it can get multiple times.  Now it's just a question of what we do about it.  And unless a kid tells a parent (which they should, but rarely do) then parents can hardly do anything about it since they won't know (unless they're spying on their kids activities online, which might as well be cyber bullying in itself.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course flaming and trolling are bullying .
It 's not a question , we 've seen how bad it can get multiple times .
Now it 's just a question of what we do about it .
And unless a kid tells a parent ( which they should , but rarely do ) then parents can hardly do anything about it since they wo n't know ( unless they 're spying on their kids activities online , which might as well be cyber bullying in itself .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course flaming and trolling are bullying.
It's not a question, we've seen how bad it can get multiple times.
Now it's just a question of what we do about it.
And unless a kid tells a parent (which they should, but rarely do) then parents can hardly do anything about it since they won't know (unless they're spying on their kids activities online, which might as well be cyber bullying in itself.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229868</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257152700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They were the only country in the WORLD to ban the sale of Left 4 Dead 2.  I think that says something, just not sure what.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They were the only country in the WORLD to ban the sale of Left 4 Dead 2 .
I think that says something , just not sure what .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They were the only country in the WORLD to ban the sale of Left 4 Dead 2.
I think that says something, just not sure what.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231468</id>
	<title>Children's charities don't care about children</title>
	<author>Brian Ribbon</author>
	<datestamp>1257162360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"<i>My question is, how is it that the "defenders of children" never have a clue about children?</i>"</p><p>The "defenders of children" are not really "defenders of children". Many of the larger children's charities are self-promoting organisations who do very little to help children. They plead for donations, but rather than using those donations to protect children, they use the money to pay for advertising and other marketing activities. The extra donations which they receive as a result of those marketing activities can be used to pay for more advertising, and the cycle of growth continues, with the organisations becoming increasingly profitable, without helping children.</p><p>Frank Furedi dicussed this issue a few years ago, in an <a href="http://www.spiked-online.com/Articles/0000000CA361.htm" title="spiked-online.com">article</a> [spiked-online.com] at Spiked Online.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" My question is , how is it that the " defenders of children " never have a clue about children ?
" The " defenders of children " are not really " defenders of children " .
Many of the larger children 's charities are self-promoting organisations who do very little to help children .
They plead for donations , but rather than using those donations to protect children , they use the money to pay for advertising and other marketing activities .
The extra donations which they receive as a result of those marketing activities can be used to pay for more advertising , and the cycle of growth continues , with the organisations becoming increasingly profitable , without helping children.Frank Furedi dicussed this issue a few years ago , in an article [ spiked-online.com ] at Spiked Online .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"My question is, how is it that the "defenders of children" never have a clue about children?
"The "defenders of children" are not really "defenders of children".
Many of the larger children's charities are self-promoting organisations who do very little to help children.
They plead for donations, but rather than using those donations to protect children, they use the money to pay for advertising and other marketing activities.
The extra donations which they receive as a result of those marketing activities can be used to pay for more advertising, and the cycle of growth continues, with the organisations becoming increasingly profitable, without helping children.Frank Furedi dicussed this issue a few years ago, in an article [spiked-online.com] at Spiked Online.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229298</id>
	<title>Re:How long until</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1257193080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What would be the motivator for such a malicious act? There's no money to be gained, and if they were caught, they'd have the book thrown at them.</p></div></blockquote><p>For one, people are not always rational. Consider arsonists, many whom have no financial connection to what they destroy.</p><p>Second, it could be hackers from another country, where investigations may be difficult due to language, legal, bureaucratic, and diplomatic barriers. And "unfriendly" countries may actually reward such work.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What would be the motivator for such a malicious act ?
There 's no money to be gained , and if they were caught , they 'd have the book thrown at them.For one , people are not always rational .
Consider arsonists , many whom have no financial connection to what they destroy.Second , it could be hackers from another country , where investigations may be difficult due to language , legal , bureaucratic , and diplomatic barriers .
And " unfriendly " countries may actually reward such work .
     </tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would be the motivator for such a malicious act?
There's no money to be gained, and if they were caught, they'd have the book thrown at them.For one, people are not always rational.
Consider arsonists, many whom have no financial connection to what they destroy.Second, it could be hackers from another country, where investigations may be difficult due to language, legal, bureaucratic, and diplomatic barriers.
And "unfriendly" countries may actually reward such work.
     
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230464</id>
	<title>Re:Adult Sites</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1257155760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except children aren't, and shouldn't, be held accountable. Your expecting an 8 year old to be able to make a distinction?</p><p>Of course, that doesn't mean some must be held accountable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except children are n't , and should n't , be held accountable .
Your expecting an 8 year old to be able to make a distinction ? Of course , that does n't mean some must be held accountable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except children aren't, and shouldn't, be held accountable.
Your expecting an 8 year old to be able to make a distinction?Of course, that doesn't mean some must be held accountable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229242</id>
	<title>Re:How long until</title>
	<author>plover</author>
	<datestamp>1257192900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What would be the motivator for such a malicious act?</p></div><p>4chan would do it for lulz in a heartbeat.  And people who honestly believe in personal responsibility (those of us who believe in being a responsible parent to our own children) probably wouldn't care if they did.</p><p>As far as I'm concerned, the only malicious act takes place when the government starts trying to parent my kids for me.  Anything that destroys that infrastructure is pretty much deserved.  While I won't actively help the channers, I'll certainly applaud whatever they do to disrupt this bullcrap.</p><p>I also expect rule 34 will kick in regarding friendly dolphins before the end of the day, if it hasn't already.  I'd check Encylopedia Dramatica right now, but that site is about as NSFW as you can get.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What would be the motivator for such a malicious act ? 4chan would do it for lulz in a heartbeat .
And people who honestly believe in personal responsibility ( those of us who believe in being a responsible parent to our own children ) probably would n't care if they did.As far as I 'm concerned , the only malicious act takes place when the government starts trying to parent my kids for me .
Anything that destroys that infrastructure is pretty much deserved .
While I wo n't actively help the channers , I 'll certainly applaud whatever they do to disrupt this bullcrap.I also expect rule 34 will kick in regarding friendly dolphins before the end of the day , if it has n't already .
I 'd check Encylopedia Dramatica right now , but that site is about as NSFW as you can get .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would be the motivator for such a malicious act?4chan would do it for lulz in a heartbeat.
And people who honestly believe in personal responsibility (those of us who believe in being a responsible parent to our own children) probably wouldn't care if they did.As far as I'm concerned, the only malicious act takes place when the government starts trying to parent my kids for me.
Anything that destroys that infrastructure is pretty much deserved.
While I won't actively help the channers, I'll certainly applaud whatever they do to disrupt this bullcrap.I also expect rule 34 will kick in regarding friendly dolphins before the end of the day, if it hasn't already.
I'd check Encylopedia Dramatica right now, but that site is about as NSFW as you can get.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30267292</id>
	<title>Show me on the doll where the bad man touched you</title>
	<author>dazaris</author>
	<datestamp>1259522280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should make it a big red button. Preferably one that takes up 2/3s of the screen and says "RAPE!" in flashing letters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should make it a big red button .
Preferably one that takes up 2/3s of the screen and says " RAPE !
" in flashing letters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should make it a big red button.
Preferably one that takes up 2/3s of the screen and says "RAPE!
" in flashing letters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229772</id>
	<title>Well then...</title>
	<author>BigSes</author>
	<datestamp>1257195360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Can flaming and trolling be classified as bullying?</i>
<p>
Everyone here on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. is really in trouble!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can flaming and trolling be classified as bullying ?
Everyone here on / .
is really in trouble !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can flaming and trolling be classified as bullying?
Everyone here on /.
is really in trouble!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230006</id>
	<title>Re:How long until</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257153300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm thinking the JS hack that replaces the "dolphin" with an identical button that sends users to lastmeasure is more likely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm thinking the JS hack that replaces the " dolphin " with an identical button that sends users to lastmeasure is more likely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm thinking the JS hack that replaces the "dolphin" with an identical button that sends users to lastmeasure is more likely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228644</id>
	<title>They didn't think this through...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257190380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Making a big friendly button just sitting there, shining at them?  Kids are going to pushing that thing like crazy.</p><p>http://2.bp.blogspot.com/\_cPI1-kGAMoY/SsIe\_WaE5gI/AAAAAAAAACA/U2qgupZJsU0/s1600-h/stimpy.jpg</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Making a big friendly button just sitting there , shining at them ?
Kids are going to pushing that thing like crazy.http : //2.bp.blogspot.com/ \ _cPI1-kGAMoY/SsIe \ _WaE5gI/AAAAAAAAACA/U2qgupZJsU0/s1600-h/stimpy.jpg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Making a big friendly button just sitting there, shining at them?
Kids are going to pushing that thing like crazy.http://2.bp.blogspot.com/\_cPI1-kGAMoY/SsIe\_WaE5gI/AAAAAAAAACA/U2qgupZJsU0/s1600-h/stimpy.jpg</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229782</id>
	<title>I see a problem with this...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257195420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Four words: denial of service attack.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Four words : denial of service attack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Four words: denial of service attack.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30267322</id>
	<title>Save the children?</title>
	<author>dazaris</author>
	<datestamp>1259522580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wasn't aware that they were an endangered species.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was n't aware that they were an endangered species .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wasn't aware that they were an endangered species.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229316</id>
	<title>YES DO this</title>
	<author>CHRONOSS2008</author>
	<datestamp>1257193140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>haha<br>hits button and runs away</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hahahits button and runs away</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hahahits button and runs away</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230164</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>wiresquire</author>
	<datestamp>1257154140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sad, isnt it? You should just be thankful you only see the really best of the ideas our glorious leaders of business and politics come up with.</p><p>It's as if pure marketing has taken over the country. Everyone is on a desperate mission to do something that is "first", "best" or some other superlative to get their 15 minutes of fame. Whether it actually makes any sense, is logically feasible, or benefits Australians is irrelevant.</p><p>ws</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sad , isnt it ?
You should just be thankful you only see the really best of the ideas our glorious leaders of business and politics come up with.It 's as if pure marketing has taken over the country .
Everyone is on a desperate mission to do something that is " first " , " best " or some other superlative to get their 15 minutes of fame .
Whether it actually makes any sense , is logically feasible , or benefits Australians is irrelevant.ws</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sad, isnt it?
You should just be thankful you only see the really best of the ideas our glorious leaders of business and politics come up with.It's as if pure marketing has taken over the country.
Everyone is on a desperate mission to do something that is "first", "best" or some other superlative to get their 15 minutes of fame.
Whether it actually makes any sense, is logically feasible, or benefits Australians is irrelevant.ws</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228668</id>
	<title>achievement unlocked</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257190440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>achievement unlocked</b></p><p>you are a regular pusher, well done!</p><p>pressing the panic button 50 times in a minute unlocks this award and gives you access to Juvie hall.<br>Extra Rewards: Parents must pay $500.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>achievement unlockedyou are a regular pusher , well done ! pressing the panic button 50 times in a minute unlocks this award and gives you access to Juvie hall.Extra Rewards : Parents must pay $ 500 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>achievement unlockedyou are a regular pusher, well done!pressing the panic button 50 times in a minute unlocks this award and gives you access to Juvie hall.Extra Rewards: Parents must pay $500.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234040</id>
	<title>Very short sighted</title>
	<author>Kanasta</author>
	<datestamp>1257185820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So dolphins keep children safe on the net.  Did you know they also get in trouble in real life?  Where will the dolphin be then?  Instead of this half baked approach, we need a real solution. What I propose, is a GPS tracking chip and button combo to be implanted into every child's wrist.  It will also be shaped like a cute dolphin button, but will be useful on and off-line!  While we're at it why not give all our children tasers, in case they get into trouble?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So dolphins keep children safe on the net .
Did you know they also get in trouble in real life ?
Where will the dolphin be then ?
Instead of this half baked approach , we need a real solution .
What I propose , is a GPS tracking chip and button combo to be implanted into every child 's wrist .
It will also be shaped like a cute dolphin button , but will be useful on and off-line !
While we 're at it why not give all our children tasers , in case they get into trouble ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So dolphins keep children safe on the net.
Did you know they also get in trouble in real life?
Where will the dolphin be then?
Instead of this half baked approach, we need a real solution.
What I propose, is a GPS tracking chip and button combo to be implanted into every child's wrist.
It will also be shaped like a cute dolphin button, but will be useful on and off-line!
While we're at it why not give all our children tasers, in case they get into trouble?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233480</id>
	<title>Can't people multitask?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257179100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If someone's distressed enough to want to contact emergency services, why wouldn't they just reach for their cellphone and dial 911? Just because you're sitting at a computer means you can't use a phone at the same time?</p><p>This is just worthless duplication of what already exists. The internet is just not the right tool for rapid response to emergencies, that's why there's no 911 equivalent online.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If someone 's distressed enough to want to contact emergency services , why would n't they just reach for their cellphone and dial 911 ?
Just because you 're sitting at a computer means you ca n't use a phone at the same time ? This is just worthless duplication of what already exists .
The internet is just not the right tool for rapid response to emergencies , that 's why there 's no 911 equivalent online .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If someone's distressed enough to want to contact emergency services, why wouldn't they just reach for their cellphone and dial 911?
Just because you're sitting at a computer means you can't use a phone at the same time?This is just worthless duplication of what already exists.
The internet is just not the right tool for rapid response to emergencies, that's why there's no 911 equivalent online.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231234</id>
	<title>Can't do physical harm over the 'net</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1257161100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet?</i> Only if you count reading the "fuck you!" that somebody typed at you as sexual abuse. Seriously, one can only do emotional, not physical harm over the net, and chances are anything some stranger tells my daughter over the 'net isn't going to effect her more anywhere near as much as something I myself say when I'm pissed off at her. Yes, parents should monitor their children's internet use, and children should be instructed to never, never provide personally identifiable information over the internet. But if you are doing that, then who cares what some immature asshole says in a chat room? And how is pushing the panic button on the typed input some anonymous coward really going to help anything? You know, at some point you've got to let your kids fall and skin their knees so they learn it is not the end of the world and they can just get up and go about there life even after something "bad" happens. Trying to protect them from everything harmful in the real world just trains them to not be able to handle the real world when you're not there, and since I plan on dieing before my kids, that's probably not a good idea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet ?
Only if you count reading the " fuck you !
" that somebody typed at you as sexual abuse .
Seriously , one can only do emotional , not physical harm over the net , and chances are anything some stranger tells my daughter over the 'net is n't going to effect her more anywhere near as much as something I myself say when I 'm pissed off at her .
Yes , parents should monitor their children 's internet use , and children should be instructed to never , never provide personally identifiable information over the internet .
But if you are doing that , then who cares what some immature asshole says in a chat room ?
And how is pushing the panic button on the typed input some anonymous coward really going to help anything ?
You know , at some point you 've got to let your kids fall and skin their knees so they learn it is not the end of the world and they can just get up and go about there life even after something " bad " happens .
Trying to protect them from everything harmful in the real world just trains them to not be able to handle the real world when you 're not there , and since I plan on dieing before my kids , that 's probably not a good idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet?
Only if you count reading the "fuck you!
" that somebody typed at you as sexual abuse.
Seriously, one can only do emotional, not physical harm over the net, and chances are anything some stranger tells my daughter over the 'net isn't going to effect her more anywhere near as much as something I myself say when I'm pissed off at her.
Yes, parents should monitor their children's internet use, and children should be instructed to never, never provide personally identifiable information over the internet.
But if you are doing that, then who cares what some immature asshole says in a chat room?
And how is pushing the panic button on the typed input some anonymous coward really going to help anything?
You know, at some point you've got to let your kids fall and skin their knees so they learn it is not the end of the world and they can just get up and go about there life even after something "bad" happens.
Trying to protect them from everything harmful in the real world just trains them to not be able to handle the real world when you're not there, and since I plan on dieing before my kids, that's probably not a good idea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230390</id>
	<title>There is a good idea there</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1257155340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's implementation needs to be thought through, but the idea is a good one.</p><p>I would rather it's texted me or my wife. Contrary to what the childless on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. think. kids aren't always around their parent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's implementation needs to be thought through , but the idea is a good one.I would rather it 's texted me or my wife .
Contrary to what the childless on / .
think. kids are n't always around their parent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's implementation needs to be thought through, but the idea is a good one.I would rather it's texted me or my wife.
Contrary to what the childless on /.
think. kids aren't always around their parent.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229090</id>
	<title>The next big new shiny thing... again.</title>
	<author>yogibaer</author>
	<datestamp>1257192240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This seems to be the next "big new shiny thing" in crime prevention. In Germany a trade union of law enforcement officers and a foundation called "German forum for crime prevention"  pushes for a system called "web-patrol" since the beginning of  2009. You can find a blog (http://webpatrol.wordpress.com/) and a presentation here (http://webpatrol.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/2009-06-09-vortrag-web-patrol-auf-14-dt-praventionstag-hannover.pdf). Nice (fake) screenshots with the panic button integrated in a browser menu bar. Sorry, but german only. Does anybody know about similar initiatives in other parts of the world?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This seems to be the next " big new shiny thing " in crime prevention .
In Germany a trade union of law enforcement officers and a foundation called " German forum for crime prevention " pushes for a system called " web-patrol " since the beginning of 2009 .
You can find a blog ( http : //webpatrol.wordpress.com/ ) and a presentation here ( http : //webpatrol.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/2009-06-09-vortrag-web-patrol-auf-14-dt-praventionstag-hannover.pdf ) .
Nice ( fake ) screenshots with the panic button integrated in a browser menu bar .
Sorry , but german only .
Does anybody know about similar initiatives in other parts of the world ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This seems to be the next "big new shiny thing" in crime prevention.
In Germany a trade union of law enforcement officers and a foundation called "German forum for crime prevention"  pushes for a system called "web-patrol" since the beginning of  2009.
You can find a blog (http://webpatrol.wordpress.com/) and a presentation here (http://webpatrol.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/2009-06-09-vortrag-web-patrol-auf-14-dt-praventionstag-hannover.pdf).
Nice (fake) screenshots with the panic button integrated in a browser menu bar.
Sorry, but german only.
Does anybody know about similar initiatives in other parts of the world?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956</id>
	<title>I'd like to suggest a novel approach</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1257191580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hi all,</p><p>I know this may come across as extremely controversial but I urge you to hear me out.</p><p>For decades parents have looked to schools, sports, and the telly to be their babysitters, and the latest is for myspace, yahoo,  and AOL chat rooms to watch over their preteens. This has proven to not work out so well - child molestation is becoming more commonplace, children's attention spans are about the same as that of a goldfish, and they have become very unruly and disrespectful, dropping the F-bomb to old ladies.</p><p>Now people are urging the gubbament to step in and introduce a panic button their children can hit, so the government will babysit their children.</p><p>The crux of the issue is personal responsibility. Personal responsibility is a thing of the past; viewed as outmoded and harmful. After all, if government doesn't take care of you, who will?</p><p>No, what I suggest is revolutionary.  It's also frightening, and it takes effort. However, in the long run I think it could work.</p><p>My suggestion is that we bring back personal responsibility. Parents should actually supervise their children. If your child isn't old enough to go out on a date by her or himself, or isn't old enough to go to a pool hall and stay out of trouble, then that child is young enough to require constant supervision. Grow a set, put in some time and actually be PARENTS. You made the conscious decision to conceive a child, now frigging raise the child. Don't look to me to pay taxes for the government to do it for you.</p><p>Oh, and on a different-yet-similar topic: bullying. Don't push for laws against bullying, because what you are doing is creating thought crime. The current bills being introduce don't make bullying a crime based on action and intention, but on perception. They are worded such that if, for example, I have a migraine and my brow is furrowed and I glance in your direction, you could interpret that as intimidation or harassment, and press charges against me. Or, similarly, if you're listening to a podcast and are LOLing at it, and you happen to be glancing in the direction of someone with low self esteem on the subway, that person could think you're laughing at them and press charges for bullying.  Instead, you should be instructing your kid who is being bullied to just grow a pair. He should beat the snot out of the bully - or at least make his very best effort to kick the bully in the family jewels. Bleeding hearts claim violence never solves violence, but that's bullshit. Appeasement never curbed the aggression of axis powers, but a nuke ended WWII in seconds. Israel has attempted to appease radical Muslims for decades and yet the Muslims will not be happy until all the Jews are pushed into the sea and Muslims occupy that puny strip of land they had ZERO interest in prior to 1947. What HAS worked is attacking the Arab states back in definitive, decisive blows.</p><p>Bullies have been bullies since man started to walk, and you know what has worked? Not ignoring them. Not killing them with kindness. Not tattling to the teacher or principal. No, what works is not taking their shit, turn around, and beat the shit out of the bully - or at least try to.  Then, the bullies stop because they know you're not an easy target.</p><p>Stop looking to government to solve all of your personal problems.</p><p>Personal responsibilty; Crime and consequences. If you do not want to engage in an interactive, responsible relationship with your children, or are unable to, do not bring children into the world - or give them up for adoption by a couple who is willing to put forth the effort.</p><p>We're creating a nanny state and allowing too much government interference in personal lives as it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hi all,I know this may come across as extremely controversial but I urge you to hear me out.For decades parents have looked to schools , sports , and the telly to be their babysitters , and the latest is for myspace , yahoo , and AOL chat rooms to watch over their preteens .
This has proven to not work out so well - child molestation is becoming more commonplace , children 's attention spans are about the same as that of a goldfish , and they have become very unruly and disrespectful , dropping the F-bomb to old ladies.Now people are urging the gubbament to step in and introduce a panic button their children can hit , so the government will babysit their children.The crux of the issue is personal responsibility .
Personal responsibility is a thing of the past ; viewed as outmoded and harmful .
After all , if government does n't take care of you , who will ? No , what I suggest is revolutionary .
It 's also frightening , and it takes effort .
However , in the long run I think it could work.My suggestion is that we bring back personal responsibility .
Parents should actually supervise their children .
If your child is n't old enough to go out on a date by her or himself , or is n't old enough to go to a pool hall and stay out of trouble , then that child is young enough to require constant supervision .
Grow a set , put in some time and actually be PARENTS .
You made the conscious decision to conceive a child , now frigging raise the child .
Do n't look to me to pay taxes for the government to do it for you.Oh , and on a different-yet-similar topic : bullying .
Do n't push for laws against bullying , because what you are doing is creating thought crime .
The current bills being introduce do n't make bullying a crime based on action and intention , but on perception .
They are worded such that if , for example , I have a migraine and my brow is furrowed and I glance in your direction , you could interpret that as intimidation or harassment , and press charges against me .
Or , similarly , if you 're listening to a podcast and are LOLing at it , and you happen to be glancing in the direction of someone with low self esteem on the subway , that person could think you 're laughing at them and press charges for bullying .
Instead , you should be instructing your kid who is being bullied to just grow a pair .
He should beat the snot out of the bully - or at least make his very best effort to kick the bully in the family jewels .
Bleeding hearts claim violence never solves violence , but that 's bullshit .
Appeasement never curbed the aggression of axis powers , but a nuke ended WWII in seconds .
Israel has attempted to appease radical Muslims for decades and yet the Muslims will not be happy until all the Jews are pushed into the sea and Muslims occupy that puny strip of land they had ZERO interest in prior to 1947 .
What HAS worked is attacking the Arab states back in definitive , decisive blows.Bullies have been bullies since man started to walk , and you know what has worked ?
Not ignoring them .
Not killing them with kindness .
Not tattling to the teacher or principal .
No , what works is not taking their shit , turn around , and beat the shit out of the bully - or at least try to .
Then , the bullies stop because they know you 're not an easy target.Stop looking to government to solve all of your personal problems.Personal responsibilty ; Crime and consequences .
If you do not want to engage in an interactive , responsible relationship with your children , or are unable to , do not bring children into the world - or give them up for adoption by a couple who is willing to put forth the effort.We 're creating a nanny state and allowing too much government interference in personal lives as it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hi all,I know this may come across as extremely controversial but I urge you to hear me out.For decades parents have looked to schools, sports, and the telly to be their babysitters, and the latest is for myspace, yahoo,  and AOL chat rooms to watch over their preteens.
This has proven to not work out so well - child molestation is becoming more commonplace, children's attention spans are about the same as that of a goldfish, and they have become very unruly and disrespectful, dropping the F-bomb to old ladies.Now people are urging the gubbament to step in and introduce a panic button their children can hit, so the government will babysit their children.The crux of the issue is personal responsibility.
Personal responsibility is a thing of the past; viewed as outmoded and harmful.
After all, if government doesn't take care of you, who will?No, what I suggest is revolutionary.
It's also frightening, and it takes effort.
However, in the long run I think it could work.My suggestion is that we bring back personal responsibility.
Parents should actually supervise their children.
If your child isn't old enough to go out on a date by her or himself, or isn't old enough to go to a pool hall and stay out of trouble, then that child is young enough to require constant supervision.
Grow a set, put in some time and actually be PARENTS.
You made the conscious decision to conceive a child, now frigging raise the child.
Don't look to me to pay taxes for the government to do it for you.Oh, and on a different-yet-similar topic: bullying.
Don't push for laws against bullying, because what you are doing is creating thought crime.
The current bills being introduce don't make bullying a crime based on action and intention, but on perception.
They are worded such that if, for example, I have a migraine and my brow is furrowed and I glance in your direction, you could interpret that as intimidation or harassment, and press charges against me.
Or, similarly, if you're listening to a podcast and are LOLing at it, and you happen to be glancing in the direction of someone with low self esteem on the subway, that person could think you're laughing at them and press charges for bullying.
Instead, you should be instructing your kid who is being bullied to just grow a pair.
He should beat the snot out of the bully - or at least make his very best effort to kick the bully in the family jewels.
Bleeding hearts claim violence never solves violence, but that's bullshit.
Appeasement never curbed the aggression of axis powers, but a nuke ended WWII in seconds.
Israel has attempted to appease radical Muslims for decades and yet the Muslims will not be happy until all the Jews are pushed into the sea and Muslims occupy that puny strip of land they had ZERO interest in prior to 1947.
What HAS worked is attacking the Arab states back in definitive, decisive blows.Bullies have been bullies since man started to walk, and you know what has worked?
Not ignoring them.
Not killing them with kindness.
Not tattling to the teacher or principal.
No, what works is not taking their shit, turn around, and beat the shit out of the bully - or at least try to.
Then, the bullies stop because they know you're not an easy target.Stop looking to government to solve all of your personal problems.Personal responsibilty; Crime and consequences.
If you do not want to engage in an interactive, responsible relationship with your children, or are unable to, do not bring children into the world - or give them up for adoption by a couple who is willing to put forth the effort.We're creating a nanny state and allowing too much government interference in personal lives as it is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228492</id>
	<title>Definitely questions for...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257189780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Will this be another scheme wasting taxpayer dollars in lieu of parental supervison, or could it actually work? Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet? Can flaming and trolling be classified as bullying?</p></div><p>I'm sure there are plenty of experts on Slashdot that are very qualified to answer.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will this be another scheme wasting taxpayer dollars in lieu of parental supervison , or could it actually work ?
Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet ?
Can flaming and trolling be classified as bullying ? I 'm sure there are plenty of experts on Slashdot that are very qualified to answer .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will this be another scheme wasting taxpayer dollars in lieu of parental supervison, or could it actually work?
Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet?
Can flaming and trolling be classified as bullying?I'm sure there are plenty of experts on Slashdot that are very qualified to answer.
;)
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229570</id>
	<title>Is this a joke?</title>
	<author>fnj</author>
	<datestamp>1257194400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this a joke?</p><p>Let me rephrase that.  This is a joke!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this a joke ? Let me rephrase that .
This is a joke !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this a joke?Let me rephrase that.
This is a joke!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228674</id>
	<title>This is better handled in private enterprise</title>
	<author>davidwr</author>
	<datestamp>1257190440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No need for the government to get involved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No need for the government to get involved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No need for the government to get involved.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229158</id>
	<title>keep your little turds off the internet!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257192540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>if those little whiners weren't on the internet in the first place this wouldn't be a problem.</htmltext>
<tokenext>if those little whiners were n't on the internet in the first place this would n't be a problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if those little whiners weren't on the internet in the first place this wouldn't be a problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228850</id>
	<title>Panic button = power button?</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1257191100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe they can just stick a dolphin sticker over the power button.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they can just stick a dolphin sticker over the power button .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they can just stick a dolphin sticker over the power button.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232622</id>
	<title>Every PC already has a Panic Button</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257171480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the power button. Feel threatened? Teach your kid to get off the damn internet and turn the PC off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the power button .
Feel threatened ?
Teach your kid to get off the damn internet and turn the PC off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the power button.
Feel threatened?
Teach your kid to get off the damn internet and turn the PC off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230126</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet is not Real Life</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257154020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You sure seem to know a lot about how pedophiles act. I think you're one of them. Be aware that I've already pushed my panic button. Expect a visit from the Australian authorities in 3..2..</htmltext>
<tokenext>You sure seem to know a lot about how pedophiles act .
I think you 're one of them .
Be aware that I 've already pushed my panic button .
Expect a visit from the Australian authorities in 3..2. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You sure seem to know a lot about how pedophiles act.
I think you're one of them.
Be aware that I've already pushed my panic button.
Expect a visit from the Australian authorities in 3..2..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228726</id>
	<title>Can sexual abuse take place in a virtual world ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257190680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet?"<br>

Err NO, exactly ZERO (0) children have ever been sexually abused by the internet. Nor for that matter have any children EVER been sexually abused over the internet, on the internet, or even around the internet. The internet has undoubtedly been a tool used by sexual predators to get access or to provide information on the location of children which they would then prey upon and abuse, but just like a gun has never shot anyone by itself, a interconnected system of computers has never abused or neglected a child, it takes people to do that....<br>

<a href="http://www.pandys.org/whatissexualabuse.html" title="pandys.org">http://www.pandys.org/whatissexualabuse.html</a> [pandys.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet ?
" Err NO , exactly ZERO ( 0 ) children have ever been sexually abused by the internet .
Nor for that matter have any children EVER been sexually abused over the internet , on the internet , or even around the internet .
The internet has undoubtedly been a tool used by sexual predators to get access or to provide information on the location of children which they would then prey upon and abuse , but just like a gun has never shot anyone by itself , a interconnected system of computers has never abused or neglected a child , it takes people to do that... . http : //www.pandys.org/whatissexualabuse.html [ pandys.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet?
"

Err NO, exactly ZERO (0) children have ever been sexually abused by the internet.
Nor for that matter have any children EVER been sexually abused over the internet, on the internet, or even around the internet.
The internet has undoubtedly been a tool used by sexual predators to get access or to provide information on the location of children which they would then prey upon and abuse, but just like a gun has never shot anyone by itself, a interconnected system of computers has never abused or neglected a child, it takes people to do that....

http://www.pandys.org/whatissexualabuse.html [pandys.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230524</id>
	<title>Re:I'd like to suggest a novel approach</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1257156000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice strawman.</p><p>"For decades parents have looked to schools, sports, and the telly to be their babysitters, and the latest is for myspace, yahoo, and AOL chat rooms to watch over their preteens."</p><p>No, [parent just want those places to be safe for their children.</p><p>I don't know why peope like you seem to think kids are tethered to there parents until they are 18...oh I figured it out, you're a short sighted moron that suffers from ignorance of arrogance.</p><p>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice strawman .
" For decades parents have looked to schools , sports , and the telly to be their babysitters , and the latest is for myspace , yahoo , and AOL chat rooms to watch over their preteens .
" No , [ parent just want those places to be safe for their children.I do n't know why peope like you seem to think kids are tethered to there parents until they are 18...oh I figured it out , you 're a short sighted moron that suffers from ignorance of arrogance. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice strawman.
"For decades parents have looked to schools, sports, and the telly to be their babysitters, and the latest is for myspace, yahoo, and AOL chat rooms to watch over their preteens.
"No, [parent just want those places to be safe for their children.I don't know why peope like you seem to think kids are tethered to there parents until they are 18...oh I figured it out, you're a short sighted moron that suffers from ignorance of arrogance..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228874</id>
	<title>I don't see this getting abused...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257191280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF are they thinking?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF are they thinking ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF are they thinking?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228694</id>
	<title>Already have one: the power button.</title>
	<author>yourpusher</author>
	<datestamp>1257190560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or is turning it off just too much to ask?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or is turning it off just too much to ask ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or is turning it off just too much to ask?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228712</id>
	<title>1 in 4 children</title>
	<author>101010\_or\_0x2A</author>
	<datestamp>1257190620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>are sexually abused by the Internet? I always knew that its only a matter of time before these large "pipes" would start doing real damage, and the "service providers" would think of other ways to screw innocent kids over</htmltext>
<tokenext>are sexually abused by the Internet ?
I always knew that its only a matter of time before these large " pipes " would start doing real damage , and the " service providers " would think of other ways to screw innocent kids over</tokentext>
<sentencetext>are sexually abused by the Internet?
I always knew that its only a matter of time before these large "pipes" would start doing real damage, and the "service providers" would think of other ways to screw innocent kids over</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228534</id>
	<title>friendly dolphin?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257189900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Y'know what else looks like a "friendly dolphin"? Come over here and let me show you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Y'know what else looks like a " friendly dolphin " ?
Come over here and let me show you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Y'know what else looks like a "friendly dolphin"?
Come over here and let me show you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30241464</id>
	<title>NO WORSE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259245080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anti-pedophile activists love statistics like 1 in 4 children are sexually abused online.  But it's false.</p><p>The study where this number came from was made over the telephone.  Kids were asked if anyone ever made sexual comments they didn't want.  Many said yes.  (There appeared to be no distinctions made between sexual invitations and saying "fag" and "suck a dick" which are incredibly common.)  They were asked if they were ever asked to do sexual stuff by adults.  Very few said yes.  But these and other questions were then piled together into a "child sexual abuse" category, with the assumption that this number -not that it means anything- was about adult-child interactions.  I read this report when it came out.  Finkelhor is one of its authors.  He made a big name for himself with the now-discredited day care scandals of the 1980's.  But people in this line of work are never discredited.</p><p>1 in 4 is just garbage.  Complete garbage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anti-pedophile activists love statistics like 1 in 4 children are sexually abused online .
But it 's false.The study where this number came from was made over the telephone .
Kids were asked if anyone ever made sexual comments they did n't want .
Many said yes .
( There appeared to be no distinctions made between sexual invitations and saying " fag " and " suck a dick " which are incredibly common .
) They were asked if they were ever asked to do sexual stuff by adults .
Very few said yes .
But these and other questions were then piled together into a " child sexual abuse " category , with the assumption that this number -not that it means anything- was about adult-child interactions .
I read this report when it came out .
Finkelhor is one of its authors .
He made a big name for himself with the now-discredited day care scandals of the 1980 's .
But people in this line of work are never discredited.1 in 4 is just garbage .
Complete garbage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anti-pedophile activists love statistics like 1 in 4 children are sexually abused online.
But it's false.The study where this number came from was made over the telephone.
Kids were asked if anyone ever made sexual comments they didn't want.
Many said yes.
(There appeared to be no distinctions made between sexual invitations and saying "fag" and "suck a dick" which are incredibly common.
)  They were asked if they were ever asked to do sexual stuff by adults.
Very few said yes.
But these and other questions were then piled together into a "child sexual abuse" category, with the assumption that this number -not that it means anything- was about adult-child interactions.
I read this report when it came out.
Finkelhor is one of its authors.
He made a big name for himself with the now-discredited day care scandals of the 1980's.
But people in this line of work are never discredited.1 in 4 is just garbage.
Complete garbage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228612</id>
	<title>Are penguins friendly too? How about beasties?</title>
	<author>stagg</author>
	<datestamp>1257190260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or are children using any kind of unsupported OS on their own?

Click the little red devil for help.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or are children using any kind of unsupported OS on their own ?
Click the little red devil for help .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or are children using any kind of unsupported OS on their own?
Click the little red devil for help.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229696</id>
	<title>Giving a panic button to an ideal child might work</title>
	<author>kawabago</author>
	<datestamp>1257195000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Giving a panic button to an ideal child might work, but I have yet to come across an ideal child.  All the children I've met would think, push button - get attention!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Giving a panic button to an ideal child might work , but I have yet to come across an ideal child .
All the children I 've met would think , push button - get attention !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Giving a panic button to an ideal child might work, but I have yet to come across an ideal child.
All the children I've met would think, push button - get attention!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234502</id>
	<title>Re:I'd like to suggest a novel approach</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259266440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I do find it extremely annoying when a non-tech, such as one these dear-god-save-the-children flower hated ladies, thinks he solve a problem he hardly understands. Anyone who has at least some knowledge of how the internet works and uses a little bit of common sense can see that such a solution, like the friendly dolphin button, would never work.<br>However, one thing that I find even more annoying, is when a techie, such as a slashdotter, who most constantly complains about the stupidity of said non-techs (I know I do), tries to do the very same. When someone advocates "growing a pair" and "beating the shit out of the bully" and then goes on to use WWW2 and Muslims as their rationale... Well, seriously you guys, you don't know what you're talking about, so plese stfu<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Anon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do find it extremely annoying when a non-tech , such as one these dear-god-save-the-children flower hated ladies , thinks he solve a problem he hardly understands .
Anyone who has at least some knowledge of how the internet works and uses a little bit of common sense can see that such a solution , like the friendly dolphin button , would never work.However , one thing that I find even more annoying , is when a techie , such as a slashdotter , who most constantly complains about the stupidity of said non-techs ( I know I do ) , tries to do the very same .
When someone advocates " growing a pair " and " beating the shit out of the bully " and then goes on to use WWW2 and Muslims as their rationale... Well , seriously you guys , you do n't know what you 're talking about , so plese stfu : ) Anon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do find it extremely annoying when a non-tech, such as one these dear-god-save-the-children flower hated ladies, thinks he solve a problem he hardly understands.
Anyone who has at least some knowledge of how the internet works and uses a little bit of common sense can see that such a solution, like the friendly dolphin button, would never work.However, one thing that I find even more annoying, is when a techie, such as a slashdotter, who most constantly complains about the stupidity of said non-techs (I know I do), tries to do the very same.
When someone advocates "growing a pair" and "beating the shit out of the bully" and then goes on to use WWW2 and Muslims as their rationale... Well, seriously you guys, you don't know what you're talking about, so plese stfu :)Anon</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228828</id>
	<title>The OTHER online bully</title>
	<author>CarlosHawes</author>
	<datestamp>1257191040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>So could I use this to report Internet "bullying" the next time Windows Genuine Advantage pops up to see if I have handed over my lunch money to Redmond as required?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So could I use this to report Internet " bullying " the next time Windows Genuine Advantage pops up to see if I have handed over my lunch money to Redmond as required ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So could I use this to report Internet "bullying" the next time Windows Genuine Advantage pops up to see if I have handed over my lunch money to Redmond as required?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232566</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>visualight</author>
	<datestamp>1257171060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229706</id>
	<title>Re:Until virtual reality gets much, much better,</title>
	<author>agnosticnixie</author>
	<datestamp>1257195060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://xkcd.com/603/" title="xkcd.com">Congrats</a> [xkcd.com], <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1457230&amp;cid=30229332" title="slashdot.org">you're a fucking moron</a> [slashdot.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congrats [ xkcd.com ] , you 're a fucking moron [ slashdot.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congrats [xkcd.com], you're a fucking moron [slashdot.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838</id>
	<title>WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257191100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can we go a few months without an article on slashdot describing yet another moronic idea from someone in Australia?</p><p>Seriously, there's something wrong in that place and I'm very curious to know what.  Or maybe, these stories are coming from the Australian equivalent of WeeklyWorldNews?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we go a few months without an article on slashdot describing yet another moronic idea from someone in Australia ? Seriously , there 's something wrong in that place and I 'm very curious to know what .
Or maybe , these stories are coming from the Australian equivalent of WeeklyWorldNews ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we go a few months without an article on slashdot describing yet another moronic idea from someone in Australia?Seriously, there's something wrong in that place and I'm very curious to know what.
Or maybe, these stories are coming from the Australian equivalent of WeeklyWorldNews?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229388</id>
	<title>I think they mean...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257193500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that children who feel they need to bully or harass someone now have a new tool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that children who feel they need to bully or harass someone now have a new tool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that children who feel they need to bully or harass someone now have a new tool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228914</id>
	<title>In other news.....</title>
	<author>hAckz0r</author>
	<datestamp>1257191400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This just in from AP News (be-ee-de-ep, de-de-p,deep);<blockquote><div><p>AV product company XYZ says a new form of computer malware now gives a whole new meaning to the term "pushing someone's button". Instead of keyboard sniffers the extortionists instead are doing keyboard injection into the computer's keyboard input queue if the PC owner doesn't comply with their demands. Word has it that people are simply ignoring the threats.</p><p>

In other news... Congress is in session drafting new legislation to enact laws against the latest "Peter Wolf Syndrome" which is currently gridlocking the legal system and has the courts running in circles. Nobody seems to know why so many people are hitting their Internet panic buttons for no apparent reason. More on this new breaking story at 11:00.</p></div>
</blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This just in from AP News ( be-ee-de-ep , de-de-p,deep ) ; AV product company XYZ says a new form of computer malware now gives a whole new meaning to the term " pushing someone 's button " .
Instead of keyboard sniffers the extortionists instead are doing keyboard injection into the computer 's keyboard input queue if the PC owner does n't comply with their demands .
Word has it that people are simply ignoring the threats .
In other news... Congress is in session drafting new legislation to enact laws against the latest " Peter Wolf Syndrome " which is currently gridlocking the legal system and has the courts running in circles .
Nobody seems to know why so many people are hitting their Internet panic buttons for no apparent reason .
More on this new breaking story at 11 : 00 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This just in from AP News (be-ee-de-ep, de-de-p,deep);AV product company XYZ says a new form of computer malware now gives a whole new meaning to the term "pushing someone's button".
Instead of keyboard sniffers the extortionists instead are doing keyboard injection into the computer's keyboard input queue if the PC owner doesn't comply with their demands.
Word has it that people are simply ignoring the threats.
In other news... Congress is in session drafting new legislation to enact laws against the latest "Peter Wolf Syndrome" which is currently gridlocking the legal system and has the courts running in circles.
Nobody seems to know why so many people are hitting their Internet panic buttons for no apparent reason.
More on this new breaking story at 11:00.

	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230948</id>
	<title>Not my definition of sexual abuse</title>
	<author>Archfeld</author>
	<datestamp>1257158940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is why I cited a national organization devoted to dealing with abuse of children, both sexually and otherwise..hence the http link to a LEGAL definition.<br>
"I'm not implying that the dolphin thing is a good idea, but I am implying that you're an idiot"
Try reading the response before calling someone an idiot...<br>
What you have cited are lewd and lacivious acts but DO NOT fall under the legal term sexual abuse.<br>
Not that I am arguing that the net isn't used by many to incite sexual abuse or as a tool to gain access to children for said purposes..but it is not my interpretation but a legal definition.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is why I cited a national organization devoted to dealing with abuse of children , both sexually and otherwise..hence the http link to a LEGAL definition .
" I 'm not implying that the dolphin thing is a good idea , but I am implying that you 're an idiot " Try reading the response before calling someone an idiot.. . What you have cited are lewd and lacivious acts but DO NOT fall under the legal term sexual abuse .
Not that I am arguing that the net is n't used by many to incite sexual abuse or as a tool to gain access to children for said purposes..but it is not my interpretation but a legal definition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is why I cited a national organization devoted to dealing with abuse of children, both sexually and otherwise..hence the http link to a LEGAL definition.
"I'm not implying that the dolphin thing is a good idea, but I am implying that you're an idiot"
Try reading the response before calling someone an idiot...
What you have cited are lewd and lacivious acts but DO NOT fall under the legal term sexual abuse.
Not that I am arguing that the net isn't used by many to incite sexual abuse or as a tool to gain access to children for said purposes..but it is not my interpretation but a legal definition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231034</id>
	<title>Prediction</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1257159420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not hard to guess how this will go. Since children do not have an adult sense of proportion, the button will get pressed for any and all occasions including "I like dolphins!".  They can't really complain about that, they're the ones who wanted all those kids to have an attractive panic button. They will end up overwhelmed and inevitably miss important calls.  The kids will decide that they can't actually rely on the cops when there's trouble.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not hard to guess how this will go .
Since children do not have an adult sense of proportion , the button will get pressed for any and all occasions including " I like dolphins ! " .
They ca n't really complain about that , they 're the ones who wanted all those kids to have an attractive panic button .
They will end up overwhelmed and inevitably miss important calls .
The kids will decide that they ca n't actually rely on the cops when there 's trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not hard to guess how this will go.
Since children do not have an adult sense of proportion, the button will get pressed for any and all occasions including "I like dolphins!".
They can't really complain about that, they're the ones who wanted all those kids to have an attractive panic button.
They will end up overwhelmed and inevitably miss important calls.
The kids will decide that they can't actually rely on the cops when there's trouble.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231306</id>
	<title>A panic button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257161580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really?! - And why does the power button not work?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ? !
- And why does the power button not work ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?!
- And why does the power button not work?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233588</id>
	<title>Re:I'd like to suggest a novel approach</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257180360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; No, what works is not taking their shit, turn around, and beat the shit out of the bully - or at least try to.</p><p>Nice idea, until the bully gets 6 of his mates, comes round and maims or kills you and your family. I was bullied at school a lot, and I know damn well not to take that approach. I saw others do it, and it was bad news for them each time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; No , what works is not taking their shit , turn around , and beat the shit out of the bully - or at least try to.Nice idea , until the bully gets 6 of his mates , comes round and maims or kills you and your family .
I was bullied at school a lot , and I know damn well not to take that approach .
I saw others do it , and it was bad news for them each time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; No, what works is not taking their shit, turn around, and beat the shit out of the bully - or at least try to.Nice idea, until the bully gets 6 of his mates, comes round and maims or kills you and your family.
I was bullied at school a lot, and I know damn well not to take that approach.
I saw others do it, and it was bad news for them each time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231464</id>
	<title>Re:I have just searched for "bear" in the comments</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257162360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>funny, i just searched and found one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>funny , i just searched and found one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>funny, i just searched and found one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233748</id>
	<title>Trance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257182160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>whatever happened to good old parental supervision..<br>are parents just so lazy now they need some stupid animated dolphin to do their work for them now?</p><p>seems like a massive waste of money imo..<br>I fail to see the difference between people being mean in real life behind someones back, and posting nasty things on facebook..etc<br>people are always going to be nasty.. the sooner kids learn this the better... take every facebook comment as a grain of salt.. or request the post be removed from facebook.. Simple!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>whatever happened to good old parental supervision..are parents just so lazy now they need some stupid animated dolphin to do their work for them now ? seems like a massive waste of money imo..I fail to see the difference between people being mean in real life behind someones back , and posting nasty things on facebook..etcpeople are always going to be nasty.. the sooner kids learn this the better... take every facebook comment as a grain of salt.. or request the post be removed from facebook.. Simple !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>whatever happened to good old parental supervision..are parents just so lazy now they need some stupid animated dolphin to do their work for them now?seems like a massive waste of money imo..I fail to see the difference between people being mean in real life behind someones back, and posting nasty things on facebook..etcpeople are always going to be nasty.. the sooner kids learn this the better... take every facebook comment as a grain of salt.. or request the post be removed from facebook.. Simple!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231126</id>
	<title>Re:I have just searched for "bear" in the comments</title>
	<author>The Archon V2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1257160260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just searched for "bear" and found you. Despite <a href="//yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1457230&amp;cid=30228838" title="slashdot.org">a good start</a> [slashdot.org] we also haven't had a thread demanding an "Australia" section where regular news items on insanity down under can be had.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just searched for " bear " and found you .
Despite a good start [ slashdot.org ] we also have n't had a thread demanding an " Australia " section where regular news items on insanity down under can be had .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just searched for "bear" and found you.
Despite a good start [slashdot.org] we also haven't had a thread demanding an "Australia" section where regular news items on insanity down under can be had.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228564</id>
	<title>The government has the most experience</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257190080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of fucking people......certainly more than some anonymous internet perv.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of fucking people......certainly more than some anonymous internet perv .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of fucking people......certainly more than some anonymous internet perv.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229118</id>
	<title>I am confused...</title>
	<author>ghostis</author>
	<datestamp>1257192420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF happened to setting limits as a parent?  This seems to be the classic "surely we can find a technical solution to a people problem" hole.  What about requiring parents to take child-rearing classes that cover internet predators and how to limit children's activities on the 'net until they are ready to handle the mostly adult online world?  This seems like anti-virus tools; the OS is broken so let's build a band-aid that covers the holes.  It seems like it would be better, a la the US Head Start program, to educate parents early in the process so their kids don't get into these situations until they are mature enough to handle them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF happened to setting limits as a parent ?
This seems to be the classic " surely we can find a technical solution to a people problem " hole .
What about requiring parents to take child-rearing classes that cover internet predators and how to limit children 's activities on the 'net until they are ready to handle the mostly adult online world ?
This seems like anti-virus tools ; the OS is broken so let 's build a band-aid that covers the holes .
It seems like it would be better , a la the US Head Start program , to educate parents early in the process so their kids do n't get into these situations until they are mature enough to handle them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF happened to setting limits as a parent?
This seems to be the classic "surely we can find a technical solution to a people problem" hole.
What about requiring parents to take child-rearing classes that cover internet predators and how to limit children's activities on the 'net until they are ready to handle the mostly adult online world?
This seems like anti-virus tools; the OS is broken so let's build a band-aid that covers the holes.
It seems like it would be better, a la the US Head Start program, to educate parents early in the process so their kids don't get into these situations until they are mature enough to handle them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229114</id>
	<title>Washington, D. C. 2050</title>
	<author>flabordec</author>
	<datestamp>1257192360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"We are now cleared to launch the missiles"
<br>Keys are turned, glasses are broken, secret passwords are entered
<br>"Whenever you are ready Mr. President, push the cute dolphin button" 
</p></div><p> Because... as we all know, dolphins are the new panic button.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" We are now cleared to launch the missiles " Keys are turned , glasses are broken , secret passwords are entered " Whenever you are ready Mr. President , push the cute dolphin button " Because... as we all know , dolphins are the new panic button .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"We are now cleared to launch the missiles"
Keys are turned, glasses are broken, secret passwords are entered
"Whenever you are ready Mr. President, push the cute dolphin button" 
 Because... as we all know, dolphins are the new panic button.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233136</id>
	<title>It's the usual trick</title>
	<author>dbIII</author>
	<datestamp>1257175620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>These nasty bastards attempting to get knee jerk emotional reactions simply redefine existing terms to make their made up statistics look real.  If questioned repeatedly they will eventually admit that they are using "sexual abuse" to mean seeing a picture of a girl in a bikini or something.  Unfortunatly the funding for dealing with real cases of child rape is getting taken away to provide resources for this insane drive to sweep everything under the carpet instead.</htmltext>
<tokenext>These nasty bastards attempting to get knee jerk emotional reactions simply redefine existing terms to make their made up statistics look real .
If questioned repeatedly they will eventually admit that they are using " sexual abuse " to mean seeing a picture of a girl in a bikini or something .
Unfortunatly the funding for dealing with real cases of child rape is getting taken away to provide resources for this insane drive to sweep everything under the carpet instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These nasty bastards attempting to get knee jerk emotional reactions simply redefine existing terms to make their made up statistics look real.
If questioned repeatedly they will eventually admit that they are using "sexual abuse" to mean seeing a picture of a girl in a bikini or something.
Unfortunatly the funding for dealing with real cases of child rape is getting taken away to provide resources for this insane drive to sweep everything under the carpet instead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229094</id>
	<title>I just had a great idea</title>
	<author>The MAZZTer</author>
	<datestamp>1257192240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Instead of having a button on the computer to connect you to police, let's have someone stationed with the child while they're using the internet!  Maybe one person per 1 or 2 or 3 kids.  This way, the workload is dispersed amongst more people and it doesn't have to go to the police.</p><p>Oooh!  We can even have this person, or even two people per 1 or 2 or 3 kids, perhaps working in shifts, raise the kid or kids and team them right from wrong and other stuff like that.  We'll call them "parents"!  Man I am so clever sometimes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of having a button on the computer to connect you to police , let 's have someone stationed with the child while they 're using the internet !
Maybe one person per 1 or 2 or 3 kids .
This way , the workload is dispersed amongst more people and it does n't have to go to the police.Oooh !
We can even have this person , or even two people per 1 or 2 or 3 kids , perhaps working in shifts , raise the kid or kids and team them right from wrong and other stuff like that .
We 'll call them " parents " !
Man I am so clever sometimes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of having a button on the computer to connect you to police, let's have someone stationed with the child while they're using the internet!
Maybe one person per 1 or 2 or 3 kids.
This way, the workload is dispersed amongst more people and it doesn't have to go to the police.Oooh!
We can even have this person, or even two people per 1 or 2 or 3 kids, perhaps working in shifts, raise the kid or kids and team them right from wrong and other stuff like that.
We'll call them "parents"!
Man I am so clever sometimes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229196</id>
	<title>Re:How long until</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1257192720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>How long then until a worm emerges that floods the govt with hundreds of thousands of fraudulent calls...?</p></div></blockquote><p>Shhhhh, it's <b>job security</b> for us techies. If lawmakers want to tangle themselves in a yarn ball and then pay us to rescue them, then let them!<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How long then until a worm emerges that floods the govt with hundreds of thousands of fraudulent calls... ? Shhhhh , it 's job security for us techies .
If lawmakers want to tangle themselves in a yarn ball and then pay us to rescue them , then let them !
     </tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long then until a worm emerges that floods the govt with hundreds of thousands of fraudulent calls...?Shhhhh, it's job security for us techies.
If lawmakers want to tangle themselves in a yarn ball and then pay us to rescue them, then let them!
     
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229644</id>
	<title>It's nice to have company</title>
	<author>bubezleeb</author>
	<datestamp>1257194700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm thankful the U.S. won't be the only country raising a generation of pu55ies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm thankful the U.S. wo n't be the only country raising a generation of pu55ies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm thankful the U.S. won't be the only country raising a generation of pu55ies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232786</id>
	<title>Is a little foresight so much to ask?</title>
	<author>GrubLord</author>
	<datestamp>1257172800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mr. Speaker, I would like to propose that the Australian Government hire on a consultant for the sole purpose of pointing out the obvious flaws in sweeping, technology-related legislation, particularly when it purports to protect our children.</p><p>Ideally, said consultant would themselves be a child, as the ability of the average small child to use technology effectively, and to imagine the consequences of poorly-thought-out plans, appears to significantly outstrip that of the average Australian politician.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mr. Speaker , I would like to propose that the Australian Government hire on a consultant for the sole purpose of pointing out the obvious flaws in sweeping , technology-related legislation , particularly when it purports to protect our children.Ideally , said consultant would themselves be a child , as the ability of the average small child to use technology effectively , and to imagine the consequences of poorly-thought-out plans , appears to significantly outstrip that of the average Australian politician .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mr. Speaker, I would like to propose that the Australian Government hire on a consultant for the sole purpose of pointing out the obvious flaws in sweeping, technology-related legislation, particularly when it purports to protect our children.Ideally, said consultant would themselves be a child, as the ability of the average small child to use technology effectively, and to imagine the consequences of poorly-thought-out plans, appears to significantly outstrip that of the average Australian politician.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230026</id>
	<title>power button</title>
	<author>Josedemuerto</author>
	<datestamp>1257153420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Turn off the computer if you are in real trouble.  Kids don't understand that when you are on the Internet you can just walk away.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Turn off the computer if you are in real trouble .
Kids do n't understand that when you are on the Internet you can just walk away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Turn off the computer if you are in real trouble.
Kids don't understand that when you are on the Internet you can just walk away.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229390</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet is not Real Life</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257193500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>&gt; You say it's easy to just turn off your computer to "escape" from the internet, but that's like saying that you can easily escape from physical bullying by staying locked up in your house.</i> <br>
<br>
But that's not the point of the parent post.  The point is that there's no need for a "911 equivalent" on the computer.  Cyber-bullying is a real problem, but it's not a moment-critical problem like getting beaten up.  If you have to switch it off for five minutes or an hour until you can call for help it's not going to result in physical harm to you.  That's why the button is a dumb idea.<br>
<br>
Virg</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; You say it 's easy to just turn off your computer to " escape " from the internet , but that 's like saying that you can easily escape from physical bullying by staying locked up in your house .
But that 's not the point of the parent post .
The point is that there 's no need for a " 911 equivalent " on the computer .
Cyber-bullying is a real problem , but it 's not a moment-critical problem like getting beaten up .
If you have to switch it off for five minutes or an hour until you can call for help it 's not going to result in physical harm to you .
That 's why the button is a dumb idea .
Virg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; You say it's easy to just turn off your computer to "escape" from the internet, but that's like saying that you can easily escape from physical bullying by staying locked up in your house.
But that's not the point of the parent post.
The point is that there's no need for a "911 equivalent" on the computer.
Cyber-bullying is a real problem, but it's not a moment-critical problem like getting beaten up.
If you have to switch it off for five minutes or an hour until you can call for help it's not going to result in physical harm to you.
That's why the button is a dumb idea.
Virg</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229720</id>
	<title>Re:Definitely questions for...</title>
	<author>ultranova</author>
	<datestamp>1257195120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>And since most of the cyber-bullying that I've encountered was perpetrated by early teens, and not malicious adults, I'd say that parental supervision would prevent a lot of that from happening in the first place. Parents need to be more responsible.</p></div> </blockquote><p>You know, proposals like this have given me an idea: just ban anyone under 18 from leaving their house or having any kind of contact with the outside world. Everyone would benefit: children would be safe, parents would know for sure that their children were not being exposed to any ideas they disagreed with, and predators would have plenty of very easy barely legal prey available as those homeschooled kids left for college and were exposed to the real world for the first time.</p><p>That's my modest proposal. Who's with me?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And since most of the cyber-bullying that I 've encountered was perpetrated by early teens , and not malicious adults , I 'd say that parental supervision would prevent a lot of that from happening in the first place .
Parents need to be more responsible .
You know , proposals like this have given me an idea : just ban anyone under 18 from leaving their house or having any kind of contact with the outside world .
Everyone would benefit : children would be safe , parents would know for sure that their children were not being exposed to any ideas they disagreed with , and predators would have plenty of very easy barely legal prey available as those homeschooled kids left for college and were exposed to the real world for the first time.That 's my modest proposal .
Who 's with me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And since most of the cyber-bullying that I've encountered was perpetrated by early teens, and not malicious adults, I'd say that parental supervision would prevent a lot of that from happening in the first place.
Parents need to be more responsible.
You know, proposals like this have given me an idea: just ban anyone under 18 from leaving their house or having any kind of contact with the outside world.
Everyone would benefit: children would be safe, parents would know for sure that their children were not being exposed to any ideas they disagreed with, and predators would have plenty of very easy barely legal prey available as those homeschooled kids left for college and were exposed to the real world for the first time.That's my modest proposal.
Who's with me?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234166</id>
	<title>Re:How long until</title>
	<author>Turidoth</author>
	<datestamp>1257187260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And this is why the internet is spam and virus free.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And this is why the internet is spam and virus free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And this is why the internet is spam and virus free.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30240644</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet is not Real Life</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259238420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your username is 'girlintraining'. That along with your post history gives to me the (imo reasonable) impression that you're a transgender person. I only highlight this in the service of pointing out that your implication that 'rural girls scare the ever-living crap out of city boys' is a bit...disingenuous at best.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your username is 'girlintraining' .
That along with your post history gives to me the ( imo reasonable ) impression that you 're a transgender person .
I only highlight this in the service of pointing out that your implication that 'rural girls scare the ever-living crap out of city boys ' is a bit...disingenuous at best .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your username is 'girlintraining'.
That along with your post history gives to me the (imo reasonable) impression that you're a transgender person.
I only highlight this in the service of pointing out that your implication that 'rural girls scare the ever-living crap out of city boys' is a bit...disingenuous at best.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230814</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet is not Real Life</title>
	<author>V!NCENT</author>
	<datestamp>1257157980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"If you're getting bullied in real life, you have to try to run away and get help immediately before your attackers catch up with you and continue the beating."</p><p>No. If you are bullied in real life you have to either do something about yourself to correct the abnormalness or, if there's nothing wrong with you, kick their asses.</p><p>One way or another; life is about survival. It still is...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" If you 're getting bullied in real life , you have to try to run away and get help immediately before your attackers catch up with you and continue the beating. " No .
If you are bullied in real life you have to either do something about yourself to correct the abnormalness or , if there 's nothing wrong with you , kick their asses.One way or another ; life is about survival .
It still is.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"If you're getting bullied in real life, you have to try to run away and get help immediately before your attackers catch up with you and continue the beating."No.
If you are bullied in real life you have to either do something about yourself to correct the abnormalness or, if there's nothing wrong with you, kick their asses.One way or another; life is about survival.
It still is...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229332</id>
	<title>Re:Can sexual abuse take place in a virtual world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257193260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...for that matter have any children EVER been sexually abused over the internet...</p></div><p>OK, you can feel free to pick your own narrow definition of abuse, but by most standards sexual abuse <b>has</b> taken place over the internet.</p><p>Examples:<br>Flashing kids.<br>Showing pornography to kids.<br>Encouraging kids to take part in sexual acts - E.g. masturbating.<br>Generating child pornography - E.g. taking and sending nude self-pics.</p><p>I'm not implying that the dolphin thing is a good idea, but I am implying that you're an idiot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...for that matter have any children EVER been sexually abused over the internet...OK , you can feel free to pick your own narrow definition of abuse , but by most standards sexual abuse has taken place over the internet.Examples : Flashing kids.Showing pornography to kids.Encouraging kids to take part in sexual acts - E.g .
masturbating.Generating child pornography - E.g .
taking and sending nude self-pics.I 'm not implying that the dolphin thing is a good idea , but I am implying that you 're an idiot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...for that matter have any children EVER been sexually abused over the internet...OK, you can feel free to pick your own narrow definition of abuse, but by most standards sexual abuse has taken place over the internet.Examples:Flashing kids.Showing pornography to kids.Encouraging kids to take part in sexual acts - E.g.
masturbating.Generating child pornography - E.g.
taking and sending nude self-pics.I'm not implying that the dolphin thing is a good idea, but I am implying that you're an idiot.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232792</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>Cimexus</author>
	<datestamp>1257172800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah because a couple of moronic ideas from a few extremists makes something wrong with an entire country? I'm sure no moronic ideas have ever come out of anyone in the American government either....</p><p>It really pisses me off to see how Australia gets unfairly dragged through the mud on Slashdot. Slashdot seems to have a knack for dragging up the absolutely most OBSCURE stories that I don't even hear about on any other Australian or international news service (and I consume a LOT of news sites), beating them up or misrepresenting the facts somehow, and turning it into "OMG crazy idea from Australia" stories.</p><p>A few of the categories of Slashdot stories about Australia that piss me off:</p><p>- Taking a mere PROPOSAL (sometimes not even a formal, written proposal) from some obscure quarters of government (sometimes even State or local government), and talking about it as if it's actually law that's been passed. The Internet censorship scheme springs to mind here. It was a proposal that Blind Freddy could clearly see was never going to pass Parliament and was wildly unpopular with about 90\% of the population! But to this day, Americans on Slashdot seem to think we have a bloody censorship regime in place on our net connections. They don't.</p><p>- Reporting on a view put forward by one or two politicians or politicians in a minor party, and stating that as being what 'the Australian Government' wants to do. Or even worse, what 'Australia' wants to do as a whole.</p><p>- Taking a random obscure piece of news that clearly would never even make the light of day, and promoting it to headline status.</p><p>Look, like anywhere, I'm sure there's a fair share of morons around in AU.  But frankly, there's there's nothing "very wrong" down there. Fundamentally they are doing better than most by almost every measure you can think of (quality of life, unemployment, economic freedom and prosperity, life expectancy, low crime rates). Plus their food isn't riddled with HFCS (banned), and they get a guaranteed-by-law minimum of 4-6 weeks of annual leave a year, free/very cheap healthcare, and a governmental system that still works pretty well (minor parties still count for something, unlike the US). Admittedly on most of these measures AU gets beaten by Norway, Sweden and a couple of other places, but of the English speaking Western democracies (US, UK, NZ, SA, AU), I know where I'd like to be right now (if for no other reason that the Australian economy is still booming and they were the only OECD country not to go into recession due to the downturn).</p><p>PS. I'm an Australian currently living in America (long term - my wife is American). So yeah, I'm biased. But you really do get a bizarre impression of Australia if all you read is Slashdot, so I had to say something!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah because a couple of moronic ideas from a few extremists makes something wrong with an entire country ?
I 'm sure no moronic ideas have ever come out of anyone in the American government either....It really pisses me off to see how Australia gets unfairly dragged through the mud on Slashdot .
Slashdot seems to have a knack for dragging up the absolutely most OBSCURE stories that I do n't even hear about on any other Australian or international news service ( and I consume a LOT of news sites ) , beating them up or misrepresenting the facts somehow , and turning it into " OMG crazy idea from Australia " stories.A few of the categories of Slashdot stories about Australia that piss me off : - Taking a mere PROPOSAL ( sometimes not even a formal , written proposal ) from some obscure quarters of government ( sometimes even State or local government ) , and talking about it as if it 's actually law that 's been passed .
The Internet censorship scheme springs to mind here .
It was a proposal that Blind Freddy could clearly see was never going to pass Parliament and was wildly unpopular with about 90 \ % of the population !
But to this day , Americans on Slashdot seem to think we have a bloody censorship regime in place on our net connections .
They do n't.- Reporting on a view put forward by one or two politicians or politicians in a minor party , and stating that as being what 'the Australian Government ' wants to do .
Or even worse , what 'Australia ' wants to do as a whole.- Taking a random obscure piece of news that clearly would never even make the light of day , and promoting it to headline status.Look , like anywhere , I 'm sure there 's a fair share of morons around in AU .
But frankly , there 's there 's nothing " very wrong " down there .
Fundamentally they are doing better than most by almost every measure you can think of ( quality of life , unemployment , economic freedom and prosperity , life expectancy , low crime rates ) .
Plus their food is n't riddled with HFCS ( banned ) , and they get a guaranteed-by-law minimum of 4-6 weeks of annual leave a year , free/very cheap healthcare , and a governmental system that still works pretty well ( minor parties still count for something , unlike the US ) .
Admittedly on most of these measures AU gets beaten by Norway , Sweden and a couple of other places , but of the English speaking Western democracies ( US , UK , NZ , SA , AU ) , I know where I 'd like to be right now ( if for no other reason that the Australian economy is still booming and they were the only OECD country not to go into recession due to the downturn ) .PS .
I 'm an Australian currently living in America ( long term - my wife is American ) .
So yeah , I 'm biased .
But you really do get a bizarre impression of Australia if all you read is Slashdot , so I had to say something !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah because a couple of moronic ideas from a few extremists makes something wrong with an entire country?
I'm sure no moronic ideas have ever come out of anyone in the American government either....It really pisses me off to see how Australia gets unfairly dragged through the mud on Slashdot.
Slashdot seems to have a knack for dragging up the absolutely most OBSCURE stories that I don't even hear about on any other Australian or international news service (and I consume a LOT of news sites), beating them up or misrepresenting the facts somehow, and turning it into "OMG crazy idea from Australia" stories.A few of the categories of Slashdot stories about Australia that piss me off:- Taking a mere PROPOSAL (sometimes not even a formal, written proposal) from some obscure quarters of government (sometimes even State or local government), and talking about it as if it's actually law that's been passed.
The Internet censorship scheme springs to mind here.
It was a proposal that Blind Freddy could clearly see was never going to pass Parliament and was wildly unpopular with about 90\% of the population!
But to this day, Americans on Slashdot seem to think we have a bloody censorship regime in place on our net connections.
They don't.- Reporting on a view put forward by one or two politicians or politicians in a minor party, and stating that as being what 'the Australian Government' wants to do.
Or even worse, what 'Australia' wants to do as a whole.- Taking a random obscure piece of news that clearly would never even make the light of day, and promoting it to headline status.Look, like anywhere, I'm sure there's a fair share of morons around in AU.
But frankly, there's there's nothing "very wrong" down there.
Fundamentally they are doing better than most by almost every measure you can think of (quality of life, unemployment, economic freedom and prosperity, life expectancy, low crime rates).
Plus their food isn't riddled with HFCS (banned), and they get a guaranteed-by-law minimum of 4-6 weeks of annual leave a year, free/very cheap healthcare, and a governmental system that still works pretty well (minor parties still count for something, unlike the US).
Admittedly on most of these measures AU gets beaten by Norway, Sweden and a couple of other places, but of the English speaking Western democracies (US, UK, NZ, SA, AU), I know where I'd like to be right now (if for no other reason that the Australian economy is still booming and they were the only OECD country not to go into recession due to the downturn).PS.
I'm an Australian currently living in America (long term - my wife is American).
So yeah, I'm biased.
But you really do get a bizarre impression of Australia if all you read is Slashdot, so I had to say something!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230800</id>
	<title>Centuries of inbreeding inmates</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257157920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's a brief history of Australia:</p><p>A few hundred years ago, the British decided to make a penal colony on a far-away island.  They sent their worst scum there, probably with existing mental conditions.  These male inmates all procreated with each other and the result is generations of scruffy-clothed, unshaved inmates with sub-normal IQs.  If you don't believe me, take a boat to Australia and when you get to the port, don't dock, just look at all the people going about with iron balls shackled to their feet.  You'll be safe on the boat because they can't swim over to you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a brief history of Australia : A few hundred years ago , the British decided to make a penal colony on a far-away island .
They sent their worst scum there , probably with existing mental conditions .
These male inmates all procreated with each other and the result is generations of scruffy-clothed , unshaved inmates with sub-normal IQs .
If you do n't believe me , take a boat to Australia and when you get to the port , do n't dock , just look at all the people going about with iron balls shackled to their feet .
You 'll be safe on the boat because they ca n't swim over to you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a brief history of Australia:A few hundred years ago, the British decided to make a penal colony on a far-away island.
They sent their worst scum there, probably with existing mental conditions.
These male inmates all procreated with each other and the result is generations of scruffy-clothed, unshaved inmates with sub-normal IQs.
If you don't believe me, take a boat to Australia and when you get to the port, don't dock, just look at all the people going about with iron balls shackled to their feet.
You'll be safe on the boat because they can't swim over to you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230962</id>
	<title>Re:Oh honestly now...</title>
	<author>Carbaholic</author>
	<datestamp>1257158940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is a pun insightful?</p><p>I appreciate the pun, it's a good one, but seriously, not an insightful comment</p><p>Watch this get modded funny and the parent not change</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is a pun insightful ? I appreciate the pun , it 's a good one , but seriously , not an insightful commentWatch this get modded funny and the parent not change</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is a pun insightful?I appreciate the pun, it's a good one, but seriously, not an insightful commentWatch this get modded funny and the parent not change</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229606</id>
	<title>More kids need to die...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257194520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been cultivating an idea for a while now that perhaps the reason we have become so incredibly blindly overprotective of our children is precisely due to how safe they have become. Up to maybe 50 years ago infant and child mortality were comparitively high. Death of a dearly loved child while undoubtedly horrible, was part and parcel of the human experience. Is it possible that the other worries that parents seem to be obsessing about in the absence of death; paedophiles, bullying, educational failure, are somehow a symptom of an unfulfilled dread about our childrens safety. Without a real threat from diseases, we have manufactored a bogeyman, made legion by our many dark fears.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been cultivating an idea for a while now that perhaps the reason we have become so incredibly blindly overprotective of our children is precisely due to how safe they have become .
Up to maybe 50 years ago infant and child mortality were comparitively high .
Death of a dearly loved child while undoubtedly horrible , was part and parcel of the human experience .
Is it possible that the other worries that parents seem to be obsessing about in the absence of death ; paedophiles , bullying , educational failure , are somehow a symptom of an unfulfilled dread about our childrens safety .
Without a real threat from diseases , we have manufactored a bogeyman , made legion by our many dark fears .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been cultivating an idea for a while now that perhaps the reason we have become so incredibly blindly overprotective of our children is precisely due to how safe they have become.
Up to maybe 50 years ago infant and child mortality were comparitively high.
Death of a dearly loved child while undoubtedly horrible, was part and parcel of the human experience.
Is it possible that the other worries that parents seem to be obsessing about in the absence of death; paedophiles, bullying, educational failure, are somehow a symptom of an unfulfilled dread about our childrens safety.
Without a real threat from diseases, we have manufactored a bogeyman, made legion by our many dark fears.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230626</id>
	<title>Re:How long until</title>
	<author>WNight</author>
	<datestamp>1257156600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Frankly, if someone tried this I wouldn't be surprised if the criminal community "policed itself"</p></div><p>Criminal community? You mean, the people down at the Super Villain's bar, or at the evil starbucks?</p><p>I mean, seriously, do you think these people just hang out and swap their personal info? I think you watch too many movies like Ocean's Eleven, where there's this huge con-community just waiting to be pulled into some nightmarishly complex scam. And of course, they all know each other and their histories.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Frankly , if someone tried this I would n't be surprised if the criminal community " policed itself " Criminal community ?
You mean , the people down at the Super Villain 's bar , or at the evil starbucks ? I mean , seriously , do you think these people just hang out and swap their personal info ?
I think you watch too many movies like Ocean 's Eleven , where there 's this huge con-community just waiting to be pulled into some nightmarishly complex scam .
And of course , they all know each other and their histories .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frankly, if someone tried this I wouldn't be surprised if the criminal community "policed itself"Criminal community?
You mean, the people down at the Super Villain's bar, or at the evil starbucks?I mean, seriously, do you think these people just hang out and swap their personal info?
I think you watch too many movies like Ocean's Eleven, where there's this huge con-community just waiting to be pulled into some nightmarishly complex scam.
And of course, they all know each other and their histories.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232144</id>
	<title>Re:I'd like to suggest a novel approach</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257168120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem with violence is that it is a two-edged sword, and potentially irreversible.  All you really need to do is demonstrate by word and action that you don't submit to a bully's will.  If he cannot manipulate you by fear (and most of them are more bark then bite), then the situation is over.  Violence should only be used as a last resort, and only in the amount required to make the point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with violence is that it is a two-edged sword , and potentially irreversible .
All you really need to do is demonstrate by word and action that you do n't submit to a bully 's will .
If he can not manipulate you by fear ( and most of them are more bark then bite ) , then the situation is over .
Violence should only be used as a last resort , and only in the amount required to make the point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with violence is that it is a two-edged sword, and potentially irreversible.
All you really need to do is demonstrate by word and action that you don't submit to a bully's will.
If he cannot manipulate you by fear (and most of them are more bark then bite), then the situation is over.
Violence should only be used as a last resort, and only in the amount required to make the point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229220</id>
	<title>Re:Can sexual abuse take place in a virtual world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257192780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know, that ethernet cable has been giving me creepy looks lately.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know , that ethernet cable has been giving me creepy looks lately .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know, that ethernet cable has been giving me creepy looks lately.
:-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229764</id>
	<title>Finally!!</title>
	<author>Derosian</author>
	<datestamp>1257195300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Finally I can REALLY get recognition for when I troll Australians!

<br> <br>So how are they going to enforce anything with this?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally I can REALLY get recognition for when I troll Australians !
So how are they going to enforce anything with this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally I can REALLY get recognition for when I troll Australians!
So how are they going to enforce anything with this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232926</id>
	<title>And then...</title>
	<author>GrubLord</author>
	<datestamp>1257173760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And when the social workers start taking people's kids away 'cause they've left them alone and the kids stumbled on something illegal online... won't that be a treat?</p><p>Heck, an ill-tempered child might just press the dolphin repeatedly and start saying horrible things about their parents just to get back at them for some imagined slight. Cue the social workers lining up to handcuff dad and take junior into foster care.</p><p>I'm pretty sure it's already illegal to physically discipline your kids in Australia. If that's true, and kids who get their bottoms smacked start crying to the friendly dolphins about it, a whole lot of people are going to be facing some stiff government fines, or even jail time. Guess what your average spoilt youngster would do with that sort of power?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And when the social workers start taking people 's kids away 'cause they 've left them alone and the kids stumbled on something illegal online... wo n't that be a treat ? Heck , an ill-tempered child might just press the dolphin repeatedly and start saying horrible things about their parents just to get back at them for some imagined slight .
Cue the social workers lining up to handcuff dad and take junior into foster care.I 'm pretty sure it 's already illegal to physically discipline your kids in Australia .
If that 's true , and kids who get their bottoms smacked start crying to the friendly dolphins about it , a whole lot of people are going to be facing some stiff government fines , or even jail time .
Guess what your average spoilt youngster would do with that sort of power ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And when the social workers start taking people's kids away 'cause they've left them alone and the kids stumbled on something illegal online... won't that be a treat?Heck, an ill-tempered child might just press the dolphin repeatedly and start saying horrible things about their parents just to get back at them for some imagined slight.
Cue the social workers lining up to handcuff dad and take junior into foster care.I'm pretty sure it's already illegal to physically discipline your kids in Australia.
If that's true, and kids who get their bottoms smacked start crying to the friendly dolphins about it, a whole lot of people are going to be facing some stiff government fines, or even jail time.
Guess what your average spoilt youngster would do with that sort of power?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233796</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257182880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Can we go a few months without an article on slashdot describing yet another moronic idea from someone in Australia?</p></div><p>While we in Australia get to hear new moronic ideas coming out of America every day!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we go a few months without an article on slashdot describing yet another moronic idea from someone in Australia ? While we in Australia get to hear new moronic ideas coming out of America every day !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we go a few months without an article on slashdot describing yet another moronic idea from someone in Australia?While we in Australia get to hear new moronic ideas coming out of America every day!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229258</id>
	<title>wtf</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257192960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, it will/would be another scheme wasting *billions* of taxpayer dollars in lieu of parental supervison... And where exactly is the problem?  Is anyone there physically attacking you?  Didn't think so.  You do know where the "off" button is, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , it will/would be another scheme wasting * billions * of taxpayer dollars in lieu of parental supervison... And where exactly is the problem ?
Is anyone there physically attacking you ?
Did n't think so .
You do know where the " off " button is , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, it will/would be another scheme wasting *billions* of taxpayer dollars in lieu of parental supervison... And where exactly is the problem?
Is anyone there physically attacking you?
Didn't think so.
You do know where the "off" button is, right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228690</id>
	<title>Another one?</title>
	<author>hyperion2010</author>
	<datestamp>1257190500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't we already have one of these?  I think its called the "Power" button unless I'm very much mistaken.  There's even a key-combo for it "alt-f4" or "ctrl-w".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't we already have one of these ?
I think its called the " Power " button unless I 'm very much mistaken .
There 's even a key-combo for it " alt-f4 " or " ctrl-w " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't we already have one of these?
I think its called the "Power" button unless I'm very much mistaken.
There's even a key-combo for it "alt-f4" or "ctrl-w".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230146</id>
	<title>People can't even use 911 right as it is....</title>
	<author>King\_TJ</author>
	<datestamp>1257154080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.break.com/index/burger\_king\_911.html" title="break.com">http://www.break.com/index/burger\_king\_911.html</a> [break.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.break.com/index/burger \ _king \ _911.html [ break.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.break.com/index/burger\_king\_911.html [break.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229770</id>
	<title>Re:I'd like to suggest a novel approach</title>
	<author>agnosticnixie</author>
	<datestamp>1257195360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To continue on the other reply - And 5 days after the Soviets launched their curbstomp of the Kwantung army, 3 months after the Soviets took Berlin...</p><p>Also, funny enough, ww2 started because the allies did exactly what you suggest to Germany.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To continue on the other reply - And 5 days after the Soviets launched their curbstomp of the Kwantung army , 3 months after the Soviets took Berlin...Also , funny enough , ww2 started because the allies did exactly what you suggest to Germany .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To continue on the other reply - And 5 days after the Soviets launched their curbstomp of the Kwantung army, 3 months after the Soviets took Berlin...Also, funny enough, ww2 started because the allies did exactly what you suggest to Germany.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229072</id>
	<title>Looking forward to 4chan</title>
	<author>MathiasRav</author>
	<datestamp>1257192120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>(User has been arrested for this post)</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>( User has been arrested for this post )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(User has been arrested for this post)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30247204</id>
	<title>tl;dr</title>
	<author>Geminii</author>
	<datestamp>1259349000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Kids get on internet; flog the dolphin"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Kids get on internet ; flog the dolphin "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Kids get on internet; flog the dolphin"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232438</id>
	<title>Re:Can sexual abuse take place in a virtual world</title>
	<author>lennier</author>
	<datestamp>1257169980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>""Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet?"</p><p>Err NO"</p><p>Someone hasn't watched Demon Seed...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" " Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet ?
" Err NO " Someone has n't watched Demon Seed.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>""Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet?
"Err NO"Someone hasn't watched Demon Seed...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231632</id>
	<title>Re:How long until</title>
	<author>mano.m</author>
	<datestamp>1257163740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't that be the noise-to-signal ratio?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't that be the noise-to-signal ratio ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't that be the noise-to-signal ratio?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229384</id>
	<title>Adult Sites</title>
	<author>WCguru42</author>
	<datestamp>1257193500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And what happens when the bullying is unintended.  Say I'm posting on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. and call someone an jackass for some comment they made.  The majority of people on this site are old enough to be able to handle being called a jackass every so often.  But what if by chance it's a little child?  Am I at fault because I made the assumption that the person I was commenting on was an adult when they were actually a child?  I don't want to be dealing with the police for some off the cuff comment on a site that is not necessarily intended for children.</p><p>And before anyone starts posting about how they aren't an adult but they visit<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.  Let me put it this way, you're joining the adults and you have to be able to deal with it.  If you can't then go back to facebook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And what happens when the bullying is unintended .
Say I 'm posting on / .
and call someone an jackass for some comment they made .
The majority of people on this site are old enough to be able to handle being called a jackass every so often .
But what if by chance it 's a little child ?
Am I at fault because I made the assumption that the person I was commenting on was an adult when they were actually a child ?
I do n't want to be dealing with the police for some off the cuff comment on a site that is not necessarily intended for children.And before anyone starts posting about how they are n't an adult but they visit / .
Let me put it this way , you 're joining the adults and you have to be able to deal with it .
If you ca n't then go back to facebook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And what happens when the bullying is unintended.
Say I'm posting on /.
and call someone an jackass for some comment they made.
The majority of people on this site are old enough to be able to handle being called a jackass every so often.
But what if by chance it's a little child?
Am I at fault because I made the assumption that the person I was commenting on was an adult when they were actually a child?
I don't want to be dealing with the police for some off the cuff comment on a site that is not necessarily intended for children.And before anyone starts posting about how they aren't an adult but they visit /.
Let me put it this way, you're joining the adults and you have to be able to deal with it.
If you can't then go back to facebook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550</id>
	<title>How long until</title>
	<author>jDeepbeep</author>
	<datestamp>1257190020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>How long then until a worm emerges that floods the govt with hundreds of thousands of fradulent calls, making the signal to noise ratio too burdensome to navigate?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How long then until a worm emerges that floods the govt with hundreds of thousands of fradulent calls , making the signal to noise ratio too burdensome to navigate ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long then until a worm emerges that floods the govt with hundreds of thousands of fradulent calls, making the signal to noise ratio too burdensome to navigate?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232582</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>Lord\_of\_the\_nerf</author>
	<datestamp>1257171180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We have a couple of crazy influential interest groups (Family First) that the major parties pandered to last election. Kevin Rudd made broad promises to make the internet safe for all, and of course the first people he went to for advice were uneducated reactionaries.<p>
The US has fictional ninja terrorists hiding in every unguarded corner, Australia has fictional ninja pedophiles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We have a couple of crazy influential interest groups ( Family First ) that the major parties pandered to last election .
Kevin Rudd made broad promises to make the internet safe for all , and of course the first people he went to for advice were uneducated reactionaries .
The US has fictional ninja terrorists hiding in every unguarded corner , Australia has fictional ninja pedophiles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have a couple of crazy influential interest groups (Family First) that the major parties pandered to last election.
Kevin Rudd made broad promises to make the internet safe for all, and of course the first people he went to for advice were uneducated reactionaries.
The US has fictional ninja terrorists hiding in every unguarded corner, Australia has fictional ninja pedophiles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230968</id>
	<title>warning: misleading by-line!</title>
	<author>wylf</author>
	<datestamp>1257159000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>nowhere in the linked articles are references to the emergency services numbers (911 in USA, 000 in Australia). While including these references has made for some funny posts, it really is quite misleading.<br> <br>
the second link talks specifically about <a href="http://www.bravehearts.org.au/" title="bravehearts.org.au" rel="nofollow">bravehearts</a> [bravehearts.org.au], which is a childrens help service for all kinds of abuse. there are also services like <a href="http://www.kidshelp.com.au/" title="kidshelp.com.au" rel="nofollow">the kids help line</a> [kidshelp.com.au], a well known Australian organisation along similar lines. My understanding is this "panic button" would relay to these sort of services, which is quite appropriate.<br> <br>
So thanks for the laughs, but how about giving more representative by-lines? I know it's asking a lot...</htmltext>
<tokenext>nowhere in the linked articles are references to the emergency services numbers ( 911 in USA , 000 in Australia ) .
While including these references has made for some funny posts , it really is quite misleading .
the second link talks specifically about bravehearts [ bravehearts.org.au ] , which is a childrens help service for all kinds of abuse .
there are also services like the kids help line [ kidshelp.com.au ] , a well known Australian organisation along similar lines .
My understanding is this " panic button " would relay to these sort of services , which is quite appropriate .
So thanks for the laughs , but how about giving more representative by-lines ?
I know it 's asking a lot.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nowhere in the linked articles are references to the emergency services numbers (911 in USA, 000 in Australia).
While including these references has made for some funny posts, it really is quite misleading.
the second link talks specifically about bravehearts [bravehearts.org.au], which is a childrens help service for all kinds of abuse.
there are also services like the kids help line [kidshelp.com.au], a well known Australian organisation along similar lines.
My understanding is this "panic button" would relay to these sort of services, which is quite appropriate.
So thanks for the laughs, but how about giving more representative by-lines?
I know it's asking a lot...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233192</id>
	<title>Re:I'd like to suggest a novel approach</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257176280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good, but you forgot to mention Hitler in your post.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good , but you forgot to mention Hitler in your post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good, but you forgot to mention Hitler in your post.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228920</id>
	<title>Relevant article from Vanity Fair</title>
	<author>dave562</author>
	<datestamp>1257191400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2009/12/sexual-predators-200912" title="vanityfair.com">http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2009/12/sexual-predators-200912</a> [vanityfair.com]</p><p>The short version is that the police and the media are contributing the hysteria of online child predators and blowing things WAY out of proportion.  In the huge majority of the cases where minors are involved in sexual conversations online, they are engaged in them with other minors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2009/12/sexual-predators-200912 [ vanityfair.com ] The short version is that the police and the media are contributing the hysteria of online child predators and blowing things WAY out of proportion .
In the huge majority of the cases where minors are involved in sexual conversations online , they are engaged in them with other minors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2009/12/sexual-predators-200912 [vanityfair.com]The short version is that the police and the media are contributing the hysteria of online child predators and blowing things WAY out of proportion.
In the huge majority of the cases where minors are involved in sexual conversations online, they are engaged in them with other minors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230562</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257156180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any more 'wrong' than most other places in the world? Yes, I live in Australia and wish the 'tards would give it a rest but unfortunately 'As empty vessels make the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest blabbers.' And Australia is so very much filled with empty vessels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any more 'wrong ' than most other places in the world ?
Yes , I live in Australia and wish the 'tards would give it a rest but unfortunately 'As empty vessels make the loudest sound , so they that have the least wit are the greatest blabbers .
' And Australia is so very much filled with empty vessels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any more 'wrong' than most other places in the world?
Yes, I live in Australia and wish the 'tards would give it a rest but unfortunately 'As empty vessels make the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest blabbers.
' And Australia is so very much filled with empty vessels.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228574</id>
	<title>The Internet is not Real Life</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257190140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your access to the Internet is limited basically to the box on your desk, or the phone in your hand, or other devices that are similarly entirely under your control.  It's not like normal harassment or bullying in that you can easily get away from it simply by turning off the device you're using to access it.  If you're getting bullied in real life, you have to try to run away and get help immediately before your attackers catch up with you and continue the beating.  Online, you can simply get off the computer and tell the proper authorities (be that the police or your parents or whoever) at your leisure.  There is not the same need for immediacy.
<br> <br>
Also, the whole idea of grooming children (or more often FBI agents posing as children) is that the pedophile gets the child to believe they're safe, and so they would have no motivation to push the little dolphin button.  The kids that go off to meet pedophiles do so because they don't perceive that they're in any danger.  If they don't perceive the danger, why would they alert the police to anything?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your access to the Internet is limited basically to the box on your desk , or the phone in your hand , or other devices that are similarly entirely under your control .
It 's not like normal harassment or bullying in that you can easily get away from it simply by turning off the device you 're using to access it .
If you 're getting bullied in real life , you have to try to run away and get help immediately before your attackers catch up with you and continue the beating .
Online , you can simply get off the computer and tell the proper authorities ( be that the police or your parents or whoever ) at your leisure .
There is not the same need for immediacy .
Also , the whole idea of grooming children ( or more often FBI agents posing as children ) is that the pedophile gets the child to believe they 're safe , and so they would have no motivation to push the little dolphin button .
The kids that go off to meet pedophiles do so because they do n't perceive that they 're in any danger .
If they do n't perceive the danger , why would they alert the police to anything ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your access to the Internet is limited basically to the box on your desk, or the phone in your hand, or other devices that are similarly entirely under your control.
It's not like normal harassment or bullying in that you can easily get away from it simply by turning off the device you're using to access it.
If you're getting bullied in real life, you have to try to run away and get help immediately before your attackers catch up with you and continue the beating.
Online, you can simply get off the computer and tell the proper authorities (be that the police or your parents or whoever) at your leisure.
There is not the same need for immediacy.
Also, the whole idea of grooming children (or more often FBI agents posing as children) is that the pedophile gets the child to believe they're safe, and so they would have no motivation to push the little dolphin button.
The kids that go off to meet pedophiles do so because they don't perceive that they're in any danger.
If they don't perceive the danger, why would they alert the police to anything?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231826</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>PaganRitual</author>
	<datestamp>1257165360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Michael Atkinson has been hammering his dolphin button ever since he saw the airport scene in Modern Warfare 2.</p><p>There is something wrong with the government, I'll grant you that. But what's worse is that we appear to have a higher than average amount of parents willing to pass their parenting responsibilities onto the government.</p><p>Seriously, I think it was in Queensland, about 6 months ago, a family tragically lost their child who drowned in the family pool, which I believe did not have a fence, or which had an open gate, or something. It was a "brief moment of inattentiveness", as if that was an excuse, given they had a small child, and owned a pool. They then had a good 15 minutes of fame loudly proclaiming that the government should implement a pool gate checking system by which every home that has a pool has periodic checks to ensure that their pool fence adheres to some to-be-created government pool fence standard.</p><p>Even losing your own child to inattentiveness while around a pool wasn't enough to shock these people into realising the responsibilities involved in raising a child when owning a pool. Their immediate call was for the government to do something about it. This is the way a lot of parents appear to work in Australia. They would prefer being forced into parenting responsibilties by the government. Even when they are apparently already clearly aware of said responsibilities.</p><p>Also, Atkinson launched a brief inquiry into the possibilty that the parents owned a copy of The Sims, describing it as "basically a depraved pool drowning simulator".</p><p>(I might have made that last sentence up)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Michael Atkinson has been hammering his dolphin button ever since he saw the airport scene in Modern Warfare 2.There is something wrong with the government , I 'll grant you that .
But what 's worse is that we appear to have a higher than average amount of parents willing to pass their parenting responsibilities onto the government.Seriously , I think it was in Queensland , about 6 months ago , a family tragically lost their child who drowned in the family pool , which I believe did not have a fence , or which had an open gate , or something .
It was a " brief moment of inattentiveness " , as if that was an excuse , given they had a small child , and owned a pool .
They then had a good 15 minutes of fame loudly proclaiming that the government should implement a pool gate checking system by which every home that has a pool has periodic checks to ensure that their pool fence adheres to some to-be-created government pool fence standard.Even losing your own child to inattentiveness while around a pool was n't enough to shock these people into realising the responsibilities involved in raising a child when owning a pool .
Their immediate call was for the government to do something about it .
This is the way a lot of parents appear to work in Australia .
They would prefer being forced into parenting responsibilties by the government .
Even when they are apparently already clearly aware of said responsibilities.Also , Atkinson launched a brief inquiry into the possibilty that the parents owned a copy of The Sims , describing it as " basically a depraved pool drowning simulator " .
( I might have made that last sentence up )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Michael Atkinson has been hammering his dolphin button ever since he saw the airport scene in Modern Warfare 2.There is something wrong with the government, I'll grant you that.
But what's worse is that we appear to have a higher than average amount of parents willing to pass their parenting responsibilities onto the government.Seriously, I think it was in Queensland, about 6 months ago, a family tragically lost their child who drowned in the family pool, which I believe did not have a fence, or which had an open gate, or something.
It was a "brief moment of inattentiveness", as if that was an excuse, given they had a small child, and owned a pool.
They then had a good 15 minutes of fame loudly proclaiming that the government should implement a pool gate checking system by which every home that has a pool has periodic checks to ensure that their pool fence adheres to some to-be-created government pool fence standard.Even losing your own child to inattentiveness while around a pool wasn't enough to shock these people into realising the responsibilities involved in raising a child when owning a pool.
Their immediate call was for the government to do something about it.
This is the way a lot of parents appear to work in Australia.
They would prefer being forced into parenting responsibilties by the government.
Even when they are apparently already clearly aware of said responsibilities.Also, Atkinson launched a brief inquiry into the possibilty that the parents owned a copy of The Sims, describing it as "basically a depraved pool drowning simulator".
(I might have made that last sentence up)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30237862</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259257800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find it fascinating that, at least according to the 'Sasayaki' poster, the "Liberal" party in Australia is the "right leaning" party.  This is worth noting, since the opposite is the case in the US.  This demonstrates the political (aka P.C.) corruption of language.</p><p>The definition of liberal has changed from a basic meaning of "excessive" to a word indicating a political distinction, which is frequently used incorrectly.  "Liberal" ideas can be either 'left' or 'right'.  When a concept is taken too far, you end up with a "liberal" idea.</p><p>The 'dolphin button' is one of these examples.  The idea of 'protecting the children' has been taken to an extreme sooo far, that there is now a bone-headed idea that somehow a government should or could 'protect' people in internet activity in individual homes.</p><p>This is one of the dangers of "liberalism" whether it comes from the left or the right.  In the US, a good portion of excessive liberal ideas come from the left.  There are a great number of confused people who somehow think that expanded government involvement is a good thing.  We are seeing extreme liberal ideas that are pushing the boundaries to socialism.  Ask the USSR how well socialism worked out... Programs are being discussed that expand government's role like never before, but will do nothing to reduce costs or help the economy.  The 'dolphin button' easily falls right into this category.  It would cost the Australian taxpayers billions of dollars, and be completely ineffectual.</p><p>The "conservative" (that is, the traditional, common sense idea - not the corrupt political definition of the word conservative) approach to various programs being discussed in the US would be to pass a few regulations addressing abuses in the market, and then let the market address the rest.  In the case of Australia, the conservative approach to the 'dolphin button' idea would be to kill it immediately before it has a chance to gain any more stupid followers, and instead encourage parents to parent, and individuals to recognize *gasp* personal responsibility.</p><p>Initiatives like this are pushing otherwise democratic societies headlong toward socialism.  Here's an idea for all the people who think government intrusion is a good idea: Move to a country who is like-minded, and leave the rest of us alone.  Give North Korea a try, they should be happy to have you - you'd be good little subjects doing what your told, and conforming to all their policies which 'keep the citizens safe'.</p><p>In the end, though, everything comes down to personal responsibility and parenting.  No amount of social or government programs can compensate for failure in the home.  Governments have, and will continue to rise and fall.  Liberal ideas progress to socialism, people lose their freedoms and become subjects to the 'state', facing all kinds and abuse never envisioned by the 'do-gooders'.  And through it all one thing remains - the family, the basic building block of society.  And the cycle starts anew.  After the corruption and abuse, parents once again begin teaching their children about reality, right &amp; wrong, personal responsibility, and how to be self reliant.  Generations later societies then progress, become successful, become rich, become lazy &amp; complacent, become degenerate, become "liberal" (political definition), become socialist, crumble.  Rinse, repeat.</p><p>'Dolphin button' - evidence of a free society in decline.  In the US we have plenty of our own 'dolphin button' examples.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find it fascinating that , at least according to the 'Sasayaki ' poster , the " Liberal " party in Australia is the " right leaning " party .
This is worth noting , since the opposite is the case in the US .
This demonstrates the political ( aka P.C .
) corruption of language.The definition of liberal has changed from a basic meaning of " excessive " to a word indicating a political distinction , which is frequently used incorrectly .
" Liberal " ideas can be either 'left ' or 'right' .
When a concept is taken too far , you end up with a " liberal " idea.The 'dolphin button ' is one of these examples .
The idea of 'protecting the children ' has been taken to an extreme sooo far , that there is now a bone-headed idea that somehow a government should or could 'protect ' people in internet activity in individual homes.This is one of the dangers of " liberalism " whether it comes from the left or the right .
In the US , a good portion of excessive liberal ideas come from the left .
There are a great number of confused people who somehow think that expanded government involvement is a good thing .
We are seeing extreme liberal ideas that are pushing the boundaries to socialism .
Ask the USSR how well socialism worked out... Programs are being discussed that expand government 's role like never before , but will do nothing to reduce costs or help the economy .
The 'dolphin button ' easily falls right into this category .
It would cost the Australian taxpayers billions of dollars , and be completely ineffectual.The " conservative " ( that is , the traditional , common sense idea - not the corrupt political definition of the word conservative ) approach to various programs being discussed in the US would be to pass a few regulations addressing abuses in the market , and then let the market address the rest .
In the case of Australia , the conservative approach to the 'dolphin button ' idea would be to kill it immediately before it has a chance to gain any more stupid followers , and instead encourage parents to parent , and individuals to recognize * gasp * personal responsibility.Initiatives like this are pushing otherwise democratic societies headlong toward socialism .
Here 's an idea for all the people who think government intrusion is a good idea : Move to a country who is like-minded , and leave the rest of us alone .
Give North Korea a try , they should be happy to have you - you 'd be good little subjects doing what your told , and conforming to all their policies which 'keep the citizens safe'.In the end , though , everything comes down to personal responsibility and parenting .
No amount of social or government programs can compensate for failure in the home .
Governments have , and will continue to rise and fall .
Liberal ideas progress to socialism , people lose their freedoms and become subjects to the 'state ' , facing all kinds and abuse never envisioned by the 'do-gooders' .
And through it all one thing remains - the family , the basic building block of society .
And the cycle starts anew .
After the corruption and abuse , parents once again begin teaching their children about reality , right &amp; wrong , personal responsibility , and how to be self reliant .
Generations later societies then progress , become successful , become rich , become lazy &amp; complacent , become degenerate , become " liberal " ( political definition ) , become socialist , crumble .
Rinse , repeat .
'Dolphin button ' - evidence of a free society in decline .
In the US we have plenty of our own 'dolphin button ' examples .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find it fascinating that, at least according to the 'Sasayaki' poster, the "Liberal" party in Australia is the "right leaning" party.
This is worth noting, since the opposite is the case in the US.
This demonstrates the political (aka P.C.
) corruption of language.The definition of liberal has changed from a basic meaning of "excessive" to a word indicating a political distinction, which is frequently used incorrectly.
"Liberal" ideas can be either 'left' or 'right'.
When a concept is taken too far, you end up with a "liberal" idea.The 'dolphin button' is one of these examples.
The idea of 'protecting the children' has been taken to an extreme sooo far, that there is now a bone-headed idea that somehow a government should or could 'protect' people in internet activity in individual homes.This is one of the dangers of "liberalism" whether it comes from the left or the right.
In the US, a good portion of excessive liberal ideas come from the left.
There are a great number of confused people who somehow think that expanded government involvement is a good thing.
We are seeing extreme liberal ideas that are pushing the boundaries to socialism.
Ask the USSR how well socialism worked out... Programs are being discussed that expand government's role like never before, but will do nothing to reduce costs or help the economy.
The 'dolphin button' easily falls right into this category.
It would cost the Australian taxpayers billions of dollars, and be completely ineffectual.The "conservative" (that is, the traditional, common sense idea - not the corrupt political definition of the word conservative) approach to various programs being discussed in the US would be to pass a few regulations addressing abuses in the market, and then let the market address the rest.
In the case of Australia, the conservative approach to the 'dolphin button' idea would be to kill it immediately before it has a chance to gain any more stupid followers, and instead encourage parents to parent, and individuals to recognize *gasp* personal responsibility.Initiatives like this are pushing otherwise democratic societies headlong toward socialism.
Here's an idea for all the people who think government intrusion is a good idea: Move to a country who is like-minded, and leave the rest of us alone.
Give North Korea a try, they should be happy to have you - you'd be good little subjects doing what your told, and conforming to all their policies which 'keep the citizens safe'.In the end, though, everything comes down to personal responsibility and parenting.
No amount of social or government programs can compensate for failure in the home.
Governments have, and will continue to rise and fall.
Liberal ideas progress to socialism, people lose their freedoms and become subjects to the 'state', facing all kinds and abuse never envisioned by the 'do-gooders'.
And through it all one thing remains - the family, the basic building block of society.
And the cycle starts anew.
After the corruption and abuse, parents once again begin teaching their children about reality, right &amp; wrong, personal responsibility, and how to be self reliant.
Generations later societies then progress, become successful, become rich, become lazy &amp; complacent, become degenerate, become "liberal" (political definition), become socialist, crumble.
Rinse, repeat.
'Dolphin button' - evidence of a free society in decline.
In the US we have plenty of our own 'dolphin button' examples.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231402</id>
	<title>IT Crowd</title>
	<author>Samah</author>
	<datestamp>1257162120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The new Panic Button will be the equivalent of:<br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RK4Xye7AErE" title="youtube.com">0118 999 881 999 119 725 3 </a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The new Panic Button will be the equivalent of : 0118 999 881 999 119 725 3 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The new Panic Button will be the equivalent of:
0118 999 881 999 119 725 3  [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228676</id>
	<title>sure, you can have a panic button</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1257190440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>as long as the panic button dials the parent's cellphone/ sends a text to the parent/ sends an email to the parent</p><p>not to some intrusive government bureaucracy with an agenda having dubious additional goals beyond just good parenting, not tailored to the specifics of each different parent-child relationship, and costing tax dollars</p><p>otherwise, its basically just a good business idea for someone to invest in and flesh out</p><p>i look forward to unintentionally humorous late night tv commercials for the internet panic button</p><p>"mom! i've fallen into porn and i can't get up!"</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I've\_fallen\_and\_I\_can't\_get\_up" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I've\_fallen\_and\_I\_can't\_get\_up</a> [wikipedia.org]!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>as long as the panic button dials the parent 's cellphone/ sends a text to the parent/ sends an email to the parentnot to some intrusive government bureaucracy with an agenda having dubious additional goals beyond just good parenting , not tailored to the specifics of each different parent-child relationship , and costing tax dollarsotherwise , its basically just a good business idea for someone to invest in and flesh outi look forward to unintentionally humorous late night tv commercials for the internet panic button " mom !
i 've fallen into porn and i ca n't get up !
" http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I 've \ _fallen \ _and \ _I \ _ca n't \ _get \ _up [ wikipedia.org ] !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as long as the panic button dials the parent's cellphone/ sends a text to the parent/ sends an email to the parentnot to some intrusive government bureaucracy with an agenda having dubious additional goals beyond just good parenting, not tailored to the specifics of each different parent-child relationship, and costing tax dollarsotherwise, its basically just a good business idea for someone to invest in and flesh outi look forward to unintentionally humorous late night tv commercials for the internet panic button"mom!
i've fallen into porn and i can't get up!
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I've\_fallen\_and\_I\_can't\_get\_up [wikipedia.org]!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230596</id>
	<title>Re:How long until</title>
	<author>Eevee</author>
	<datestamp>1257156420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>4chan would do it for lulz in a heartbeat.</p></div></blockquote><p>/b/ would do for lulz in in a heartbeat,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/c/ would want to see more pictures of the dolphin,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/d/ would produce rule 34 images of the dolphin just to annoy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/c/,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/tg/ would attempt to make bad 40K jokes about it, and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/x/ would mutter about a conspiracy being behind it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>4chan would do it for lulz in a heartbeat./b/ would do for lulz in in a heartbeat , /c/ would want to see more pictures of the dolphin , /d/ would produce rule 34 images of the dolphin just to annoy /c/ , /tg/ would attempt to make bad 40K jokes about it , and /x/ would mutter about a conspiracy being behind it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4chan would do it for lulz in a heartbeat./b/ would do for lulz in in a heartbeat, /c/ would want to see more pictures of the dolphin, /d/ would produce rule 34 images of the dolphin just to annoy /c/, /tg/ would attempt to make bad 40K jokes about it, and /x/ would mutter about a conspiracy being behind it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229678</id>
	<title>Re:I'd like to suggest a novel approach</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1257194940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its worse than a nanny state. The kids are being turned into hostages.
</p><p>"Clean up the 'Net now! Or the kid gets it!"
</p><p>This appears to be yet another case of letting something go to the point where an official complaint is warranted. And then creating an easy method for generating that complain. The end result will be a mass of 'Dolphin Button' events used to justify increased law enforcement, Internet policing and of course the requisite funding.
</p><p>What got me thinking along this line: This week, a latte stand opened up near my house. It happens to be one of those stands featuring scantily clad (bikini) wearing barristas. The city (Bellevue, WA) is up in arms! Think of the children!! I'm sitting here, in a nearby mall food court posting this. As I post, there is a group of a half dozen mothers w/baby carriages lined up. One lady is handing out printed instructions and going over the plan to push the kids past the latte stand. Undoubtedly, shock and horror will ensue as the kiddies catch a glimpse of a bikini top. Never mind that most of them are probably still feeding off mom's tit and this will simply be a reminder that they are due for their own latte. But it'll be a great photo op for the press and fodder for the next city council meeting. Now excuse me while I head out to watch the circus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its worse than a nanny state .
The kids are being turned into hostages .
" Clean up the 'Net now !
Or the kid gets it !
" This appears to be yet another case of letting something go to the point where an official complaint is warranted .
And then creating an easy method for generating that complain .
The end result will be a mass of 'Dolphin Button ' events used to justify increased law enforcement , Internet policing and of course the requisite funding .
What got me thinking along this line : This week , a latte stand opened up near my house .
It happens to be one of those stands featuring scantily clad ( bikini ) wearing barristas .
The city ( Bellevue , WA ) is up in arms !
Think of the children ! !
I 'm sitting here , in a nearby mall food court posting this .
As I post , there is a group of a half dozen mothers w/baby carriages lined up .
One lady is handing out printed instructions and going over the plan to push the kids past the latte stand .
Undoubtedly , shock and horror will ensue as the kiddies catch a glimpse of a bikini top .
Never mind that most of them are probably still feeding off mom 's tit and this will simply be a reminder that they are due for their own latte .
But it 'll be a great photo op for the press and fodder for the next city council meeting .
Now excuse me while I head out to watch the circus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its worse than a nanny state.
The kids are being turned into hostages.
"Clean up the 'Net now!
Or the kid gets it!
"
This appears to be yet another case of letting something go to the point where an official complaint is warranted.
And then creating an easy method for generating that complain.
The end result will be a mass of 'Dolphin Button' events used to justify increased law enforcement, Internet policing and of course the requisite funding.
What got me thinking along this line: This week, a latte stand opened up near my house.
It happens to be one of those stands featuring scantily clad (bikini) wearing barristas.
The city (Bellevue, WA) is up in arms!
Think of the children!!
I'm sitting here, in a nearby mall food court posting this.
As I post, there is a group of a half dozen mothers w/baby carriages lined up.
One lady is handing out printed instructions and going over the plan to push the kids past the latte stand.
Undoubtedly, shock and horror will ensue as the kiddies catch a glimpse of a bikini top.
Never mind that most of them are probably still feeding off mom's tit and this will simply be a reminder that they are due for their own latte.
But it'll be a great photo op for the press and fodder for the next city council meeting.
Now excuse me while I head out to watch the circus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231984</id>
	<title>When I was about 11-12...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257166920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was 1998-1999, and I was just discovering an enthusiasm for computers. I had found these things called chat rooms where I could talk to anyone from all over the world! <br>
&nbsp; One day, some of the chat channel started talking about things that I had little to no knowledge of, until I was asked if I wanted to cyber. I asked what that meant, and yes, the answer was indeed cybersex. Now, I didn't usually go around announcing that I was an 11 year old, I think you had to be over a certain age to go on the chat rooms, so it was probably only the regular variety of internet creep. <br>
&nbsp; So, I accepted the invitation, and ended up in a private conversation with two other people. They started talking about a bunch of stuff that I wasn't particularly interested in, and I didn't really know how (or if I even wanted) to contribute. So I left, and went back to the main channel. </p><p>Out of curiosity, how would a big dolphin button have helped me there exactly?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was 1998-1999 , and I was just discovering an enthusiasm for computers .
I had found these things called chat rooms where I could talk to anyone from all over the world !
  One day , some of the chat channel started talking about things that I had little to no knowledge of , until I was asked if I wanted to cyber .
I asked what that meant , and yes , the answer was indeed cybersex .
Now , I did n't usually go around announcing that I was an 11 year old , I think you had to be over a certain age to go on the chat rooms , so it was probably only the regular variety of internet creep .
  So , I accepted the invitation , and ended up in a private conversation with two other people .
They started talking about a bunch of stuff that I was n't particularly interested in , and I did n't really know how ( or if I even wanted ) to contribute .
So I left , and went back to the main channel .
Out of curiosity , how would a big dolphin button have helped me there exactly ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was 1998-1999, and I was just discovering an enthusiasm for computers.
I had found these things called chat rooms where I could talk to anyone from all over the world!
  One day, some of the chat channel started talking about things that I had little to no knowledge of, until I was asked if I wanted to cyber.
I asked what that meant, and yes, the answer was indeed cybersex.
Now, I didn't usually go around announcing that I was an 11 year old, I think you had to be over a certain age to go on the chat rooms, so it was probably only the regular variety of internet creep.
  So, I accepted the invitation, and ended up in a private conversation with two other people.
They started talking about a bunch of stuff that I wasn't particularly interested in, and I didn't really know how (or if I even wanted) to contribute.
So I left, and went back to the main channel.
Out of curiosity, how would a big dolphin button have helped me there exactly?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233868</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>SJ2000</author>
	<datestamp>1257183840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You forgot to mention the House of Representatives and it's main role and how it differs from the Senate. The House of Representatives is just as important as the Senate with more power in regards to what they can legislate on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot to mention the House of Representatives and it 's main role and how it differs from the Senate .
The House of Representatives is just as important as the Senate with more power in regards to what they can legislate on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot to mention the House of Representatives and it's main role and how it differs from the Senate.
The House of Representatives is just as important as the Senate with more power in regards to what they can legislate on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228798</id>
	<title>New Euphemism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257190920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think that, if I were a small child, I'd probably pound on that dolphin button all day long.  Hey, pounding the dolphin!  New euphemism!  Kids, don't try this at home...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that , if I were a small child , I 'd probably pound on that dolphin button all day long .
Hey , pounding the dolphin !
New euphemism !
Kids , do n't try this at home.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that, if I were a small child, I'd probably pound on that dolphin button all day long.
Hey, pounding the dolphin!
New euphemism!
Kids, don't try this at home...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229030</id>
	<title>Boss Key Next?</title>
	<author>andrewagill</author>
	<datestamp>1257191820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let me know when they add a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boss\_key" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">boss key</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me know when they add a boss key [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me know when they add a boss key [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229994</id>
	<title>Re:Definitely questions for...</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1257153240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Also, it seems that this would encourage people to use the panic button for stupid reasons.</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.snopes.com/crime/cops/burger.asp" title="snopes.com">I ordered pizza online with my credit card two hours ago, and the delivery guy isn't here yet.</a> [snopes.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , it seems that this would encourage people to use the panic button for stupid reasons .
I ordered pizza online with my credit card two hours ago , and the delivery guy is n't here yet .
[ snopes.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, it seems that this would encourage people to use the panic button for stupid reasons.
I ordered pizza online with my credit card two hours ago, and the delivery guy isn't here yet.
[snopes.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228700</id>
	<title>Hacked</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257190560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know the absolute <em>first</em> thing that will happen is that some pedo-hacker will use a PC virus to hack into the Dolphin and send all "panic" help requests to themselves.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know the absolute first thing that will happen is that some pedo-hacker will use a PC virus to hack into the Dolphin and send all " panic " help requests to themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know the absolute first thing that will happen is that some pedo-hacker will use a PC virus to hack into the Dolphin and send all "panic" help requests to themselves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234186</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>baKanale</author>
	<datestamp>1257187620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Seriously, there's something wrong in that place and I'm very curious to know what.</p></div></blockquote><p>Vegemite.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , there 's something wrong in that place and I 'm very curious to know what.Vegemite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, there's something wrong in that place and I'm very curious to know what.Vegemite.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228638</id>
	<title>Re:Definitely questions for...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257190320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My younger brothers know not to call 911 unless it is a real emergency.  But I can't say they'd have the same discipline with something like this.</p><p>Also, it seems that this would encourage people to use the panic button for stupid reasons.  If there really enough of a problem to justify these extreme measures, then children shouldn't be allowed to use an internet connected computer without supervision.  I don't routinely let my brothers play with the stove, but if they want to eat something I help them cook it.  I don't see why use of the internet should be any different, other than parents not wanting to participate with their kids or not having the time to supervise them fully.  A few of the kids I babysit have told me before that they are allowed to use the computer whenever they want.  My usual response is 'That's your parent's decision, but my computer doesn't get touched unless I'm there.'  Parents should be made more aware of the dangers and responsibilities of having open access on computers in their home for the younger kids.</p><p>Instead of a police button, get some parental material out to inform the responsible adults about the issue.  I think that would do much more good.</p><p>And since most of the cyber-bullying that I've encountered was perpetrated by early teens, and not malicious adults, I'd say that parental supervision would prevent a lot of that from happening in the first place.  Parents need to be more responsible.  --End of rant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My younger brothers know not to call 911 unless it is a real emergency .
But I ca n't say they 'd have the same discipline with something like this.Also , it seems that this would encourage people to use the panic button for stupid reasons .
If there really enough of a problem to justify these extreme measures , then children should n't be allowed to use an internet connected computer without supervision .
I do n't routinely let my brothers play with the stove , but if they want to eat something I help them cook it .
I do n't see why use of the internet should be any different , other than parents not wanting to participate with their kids or not having the time to supervise them fully .
A few of the kids I babysit have told me before that they are allowed to use the computer whenever they want .
My usual response is 'That 's your parent 's decision , but my computer does n't get touched unless I 'm there .
' Parents should be made more aware of the dangers and responsibilities of having open access on computers in their home for the younger kids.Instead of a police button , get some parental material out to inform the responsible adults about the issue .
I think that would do much more good.And since most of the cyber-bullying that I 've encountered was perpetrated by early teens , and not malicious adults , I 'd say that parental supervision would prevent a lot of that from happening in the first place .
Parents need to be more responsible .
--End of rant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My younger brothers know not to call 911 unless it is a real emergency.
But I can't say they'd have the same discipline with something like this.Also, it seems that this would encourage people to use the panic button for stupid reasons.
If there really enough of a problem to justify these extreme measures, then children shouldn't be allowed to use an internet connected computer without supervision.
I don't routinely let my brothers play with the stove, but if they want to eat something I help them cook it.
I don't see why use of the internet should be any different, other than parents not wanting to participate with their kids or not having the time to supervise them fully.
A few of the kids I babysit have told me before that they are allowed to use the computer whenever they want.
My usual response is 'That's your parent's decision, but my computer doesn't get touched unless I'm there.
'  Parents should be made more aware of the dangers and responsibilities of having open access on computers in their home for the younger kids.Instead of a police button, get some parental material out to inform the responsible adults about the issue.
I think that would do much more good.And since most of the cyber-bullying that I've encountered was perpetrated by early teens, and not malicious adults, I'd say that parental supervision would prevent a lot of that from happening in the first place.
Parents need to be more responsible.
--End of rant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229078</id>
	<title>Dolphin?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257192180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't an animated Chris Hansen be a better display?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't an animated Chris Hansen be a better display ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't an animated Chris Hansen be a better display?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229064</id>
	<title>Why leave this up to the child?</title>
	<author>BlowHole666</author>
	<datestamp>1257192060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How can they be sure a child will know how to identify a sexual predator? Since when is trolling a crime? Also where are the parents? Are parents okay with an unknown adult be it a police officer or a social worker getting into their child's business? Since when did it become the governments job to parents peoples children? Why not allow the parents to make the choice on if the police should be called. Leaving that decision to a child is just opening the door to all sorts of problems.<br> <br>
Also why is it that we now need programs like this? Kids will always be kids. Children have always been bullied in one form or another why is now that this day in age it is a crime and a huge problem? Why not focus on the problem of why now in this day in age when a kid is bullied they shoot up a school or try to commit suicide. Lets find out why kids today are "soft" and let things like name calling or different opinions send kids over the edge where 20 years ago this sort of thing would not happen. If we do not solve that problem kids of today will be in for a rude surprise when they hit the real world.<br> <br>
I am not saying if a child is being sexually assaulted by a 50 year old in yahoo chat that the authorities should not be notified, I think they should and in regards to that I think the parents should make the decision to notify the police. In regards to bullying I think in some cases kids of today should grow up a little and prepare for real life and accept that sometimes people are assholes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can they be sure a child will know how to identify a sexual predator ?
Since when is trolling a crime ?
Also where are the parents ?
Are parents okay with an unknown adult be it a police officer or a social worker getting into their child 's business ?
Since when did it become the governments job to parents peoples children ?
Why not allow the parents to make the choice on if the police should be called .
Leaving that decision to a child is just opening the door to all sorts of problems .
Also why is it that we now need programs like this ?
Kids will always be kids .
Children have always been bullied in one form or another why is now that this day in age it is a crime and a huge problem ?
Why not focus on the problem of why now in this day in age when a kid is bullied they shoot up a school or try to commit suicide .
Lets find out why kids today are " soft " and let things like name calling or different opinions send kids over the edge where 20 years ago this sort of thing would not happen .
If we do not solve that problem kids of today will be in for a rude surprise when they hit the real world .
I am not saying if a child is being sexually assaulted by a 50 year old in yahoo chat that the authorities should not be notified , I think they should and in regards to that I think the parents should make the decision to notify the police .
In regards to bullying I think in some cases kids of today should grow up a little and prepare for real life and accept that sometimes people are assholes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can they be sure a child will know how to identify a sexual predator?
Since when is trolling a crime?
Also where are the parents?
Are parents okay with an unknown adult be it a police officer or a social worker getting into their child's business?
Since when did it become the governments job to parents peoples children?
Why not allow the parents to make the choice on if the police should be called.
Leaving that decision to a child is just opening the door to all sorts of problems.
Also why is it that we now need programs like this?
Kids will always be kids.
Children have always been bullied in one form or another why is now that this day in age it is a crime and a huge problem?
Why not focus on the problem of why now in this day in age when a kid is bullied they shoot up a school or try to commit suicide.
Lets find out why kids today are "soft" and let things like name calling or different opinions send kids over the edge where 20 years ago this sort of thing would not happen.
If we do not solve that problem kids of today will be in for a rude surprise when they hit the real world.
I am not saying if a child is being sexually assaulted by a 50 year old in yahoo chat that the authorities should not be notified, I think they should and in regards to that I think the parents should make the decision to notify the police.
In regards to bullying I think in some cases kids of today should grow up a little and prepare for real life and accept that sometimes people are assholes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229140</id>
	<title>Re:How long until</title>
	<author>wjc\_25</author>
	<datestamp>1257192420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You seem to think people will only act maliciously if there's something to be gained. I can't imagine why one would think that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You seem to think people will only act maliciously if there 's something to be gained .
I ca n't imagine why one would think that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You seem to think people will only act maliciously if there's something to be gained.
I can't imagine why one would think that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231638</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257163800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Australia is flushed with money and has a fairly large government. So what happens is committee A identifies an issue (children exposed to internet bullying), the government then commissions an investigation into this problem. Millions of dollars get spent to come up with something stupid to address the problem - usually with dubious facts and statistics to back it up (as millions have been spent investigating the problem - they can't simply come back with an answer like - they just need to be supervised and educated), later the recommendations in the report are put infront of a politician who rejects it as a stupid idea - sometimes it gets to parliament before its rejected.</p><p>As these reports are available under FOI acts, the press can easily get their hands on them.....</p><p>Anyway, two years later, someone will identify the same problem, a committee will be put together and come up with a slightly different idea but basically the same concept. This will get put infront of a politician who will rejected it as a stupid idea.</p><p>Rinse, repeat....</p><p>Occasionally, there is a change of government - the government will review the work of the previous government and sometimes use these reports to score points politically. The former government sat on this report for X years, we are hard workers, we don't sit on our hands, we will implement these measures. Basically what happened with the Internet filtering crap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Australia is flushed with money and has a fairly large government .
So what happens is committee A identifies an issue ( children exposed to internet bullying ) , the government then commissions an investigation into this problem .
Millions of dollars get spent to come up with something stupid to address the problem - usually with dubious facts and statistics to back it up ( as millions have been spent investigating the problem - they ca n't simply come back with an answer like - they just need to be supervised and educated ) , later the recommendations in the report are put infront of a politician who rejects it as a stupid idea - sometimes it gets to parliament before its rejected.As these reports are available under FOI acts , the press can easily get their hands on them.....Anyway , two years later , someone will identify the same problem , a committee will be put together and come up with a slightly different idea but basically the same concept .
This will get put infront of a politician who will rejected it as a stupid idea.Rinse , repeat....Occasionally , there is a change of government - the government will review the work of the previous government and sometimes use these reports to score points politically .
The former government sat on this report for X years , we are hard workers , we do n't sit on our hands , we will implement these measures .
Basically what happened with the Internet filtering crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Australia is flushed with money and has a fairly large government.
So what happens is committee A identifies an issue (children exposed to internet bullying), the government then commissions an investigation into this problem.
Millions of dollars get spent to come up with something stupid to address the problem - usually with dubious facts and statistics to back it up (as millions have been spent investigating the problem - they can't simply come back with an answer like - they just need to be supervised and educated), later the recommendations in the report are put infront of a politician who rejects it as a stupid idea - sometimes it gets to parliament before its rejected.As these reports are available under FOI acts, the press can easily get their hands on them.....Anyway, two years later, someone will identify the same problem, a committee will be put together and come up with a slightly different idea but basically the same concept.
This will get put infront of a politician who will rejected it as a stupid idea.Rinse, repeat....Occasionally, there is a change of government - the government will review the work of the previous government and sometimes use these reports to score points politically.
The former government sat on this report for X years, we are hard workers, we don't sit on our hands, we will implement these measures.
Basically what happened with the Internet filtering crap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233236</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>Ocker3</author>
	<datestamp>1257176640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>insightful (fellow Ozzie here), do you have a newsletter?</htmltext>
<tokenext>insightful ( fellow Ozzie here ) , do you have a newsletter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>insightful (fellow Ozzie here), do you have a newsletter?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229376</id>
	<title>Where are the parents?</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1257193440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Child molesters on the 'Net (although not as common as the press would have you believe) are an excellent teaching opportunity for kids. If the kids are trained to recognize them, they can easily delete the message, or call mom and dad over to see the weird e-mail. At this point, the perv can't reach out and do actual harm to the kid. Mom and dad are in a far better position to judge the seriousness of the incident and decide whether to just log off or call the cops. And they can add a little lesson about why pics of private parts are inappropriate. The 'Net isn't a babysitter. If your kid uses it, you are going to have to help them navigate it. Including the nasty bits, just like real life. Better to teach them where the fix is the Delete key than the weirdo in the bushes.
</p><p>Anybody mods me down and  I'm hitting my dolphin button!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Child molesters on the 'Net ( although not as common as the press would have you believe ) are an excellent teaching opportunity for kids .
If the kids are trained to recognize them , they can easily delete the message , or call mom and dad over to see the weird e-mail .
At this point , the perv ca n't reach out and do actual harm to the kid .
Mom and dad are in a far better position to judge the seriousness of the incident and decide whether to just log off or call the cops .
And they can add a little lesson about why pics of private parts are inappropriate .
The 'Net is n't a babysitter .
If your kid uses it , you are going to have to help them navigate it .
Including the nasty bits , just like real life .
Better to teach them where the fix is the Delete key than the weirdo in the bushes .
Anybody mods me down and I 'm hitting my dolphin button !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Child molesters on the 'Net (although not as common as the press would have you believe) are an excellent teaching opportunity for kids.
If the kids are trained to recognize them, they can easily delete the message, or call mom and dad over to see the weird e-mail.
At this point, the perv can't reach out and do actual harm to the kid.
Mom and dad are in a far better position to judge the seriousness of the incident and decide whether to just log off or call the cops.
And they can add a little lesson about why pics of private parts are inappropriate.
The 'Net isn't a babysitter.
If your kid uses it, you are going to have to help them navigate it.
Including the nasty bits, just like real life.
Better to teach them where the fix is the Delete key than the weirdo in the bushes.
Anybody mods me down and  I'm hitting my dolphin button!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234800</id>
	<title>dolphin?</title>
	<author>abarrieris5eV</author>
	<datestamp>1259227560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What strikes me most about this is that the dolphin shape has been decided, while other details, like: what will the button actually do? where do we buy/acquire the tech? is this a good idea? are still undecided.  It's like in the hitchhikers guide book where they are back in time on earth with the golgafrinchams and they are wanting to invent a wheel, and the most important decision to them is what color (colour in the book I suppose) to make it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What strikes me most about this is that the dolphin shape has been decided , while other details , like : what will the button actually do ?
where do we buy/acquire the tech ?
is this a good idea ?
are still undecided .
It 's like in the hitchhikers guide book where they are back in time on earth with the golgafrinchams and they are wanting to invent a wheel , and the most important decision to them is what color ( colour in the book I suppose ) to make it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What strikes me most about this is that the dolphin shape has been decided, while other details, like: what will the button actually do?
where do we buy/acquire the tech?
is this a good idea?
are still undecided.
It's like in the hitchhikers guide book where they are back in time on earth with the golgafrinchams and they are wanting to invent a wheel, and the most important decision to them is what color (colour in the book I suppose) to make it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232844</id>
	<title>No way it'd do that</title>
	<author>GrubLord</author>
	<datestamp>1257173160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The worm would just redirect the panic button <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">here</a> [youtube.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The worm would just redirect the panic button here [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The worm would just redirect the panic button here [youtube.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228926</id>
	<title>Gimme a sec to get back off the floor...</title>
	<author>Porchroof</author>
	<datestamp>1257191460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p><p>How about a button for when my ass begins to itch?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHow about a button for when my ass begins to itch ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHow about a button for when my ass begins to itch?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230778</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet is not Real Life</title>
	<author>lymond01</author>
	<datestamp>1257157740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chat session log:</p><p>child:  ur not being very nice</p><p>evil:  no.  I'm not a nice person</p><p>child: then Im gonna go</p><p>evil:  you better not.  I know where you live</p><p>child:  I'll tell my mom</p><p>evil:  you better f---in not.  Don't you f---in log out</p><p>child:  ok</p><p>evil:  now do what I tell you you f---in brat.  Pull down your...</p><p>Etc etc etc.  Things can go horribly wrong on the Internet.  Don't assume a child will know that 999 times out of 100 he CAN just log out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chat session log : child : ur not being very niceevil : no .
I 'm not a nice personchild : then Im gon na goevil : you better not .
I know where you livechild : I 'll tell my momevil : you better f---in not .
Do n't you f---in log outchild : okevil : now do what I tell you you f---in brat .
Pull down your...Etc etc etc .
Things can go horribly wrong on the Internet .
Do n't assume a child will know that 999 times out of 100 he CAN just log out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chat session log:child:  ur not being very niceevil:  no.
I'm not a nice personchild: then Im gonna goevil:  you better not.
I know where you livechild:  I'll tell my momevil:  you better f---in not.
Don't you f---in log outchild:  okevil:  now do what I tell you you f---in brat.
Pull down your...Etc etc etc.
Things can go horribly wrong on the Internet.
Don't assume a child will know that 999 times out of 100 he CAN just log out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229296</id>
	<title>Re:Until virtual reality gets much, much better,</title>
	<author>rwv</author>
	<datestamp>1257193080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>restricting parenthood to those with the capacity to do the job</p></div><p>I don't believe it's a popular opinion, but I believe Child Protective Services should be expanded before things like "The Dolphin System" get implemented.  In my humble opinion, parents who are unqualified do more harm to the society of children than anybody through the internet ever could.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>restricting parenthood to those with the capacity to do the jobI do n't believe it 's a popular opinion , but I believe Child Protective Services should be expanded before things like " The Dolphin System " get implemented .
In my humble opinion , parents who are unqualified do more harm to the society of children than anybody through the internet ever could .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>restricting parenthood to those with the capacity to do the jobI don't believe it's a popular opinion, but I believe Child Protective Services should be expanded before things like "The Dolphin System" get implemented.
In my humble opinion, parents who are unqualified do more harm to the society of children than anybody through the internet ever could.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30242712</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259257980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A masterful summing-up, although I'd like to make one small correction to what you wrote regarding the Labor and Liberal parties. (And yes, Labor for some reason do spell their name like that rather than with a U as would be correct) Rather than being left-leaning or right-leaning, respectively, Labor are right-leaning and Liberal are hard-right nutcases. The only left-leaning parties in the whole of the Australian political system are the Greens, the Australian Sex Party, and the soon-to-be Australian Pirate Party.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A masterful summing-up , although I 'd like to make one small correction to what you wrote regarding the Labor and Liberal parties .
( And yes , Labor for some reason do spell their name like that rather than with a U as would be correct ) Rather than being left-leaning or right-leaning , respectively , Labor are right-leaning and Liberal are hard-right nutcases .
The only left-leaning parties in the whole of the Australian political system are the Greens , the Australian Sex Party , and the soon-to-be Australian Pirate Party .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A masterful summing-up, although I'd like to make one small correction to what you wrote regarding the Labor and Liberal parties.
(And yes, Labor for some reason do spell their name like that rather than with a U as would be correct) Rather than being left-leaning or right-leaning, respectively, Labor are right-leaning and Liberal are hard-right nutcases.
The only left-leaning parties in the whole of the Australian political system are the Greens, the Australian Sex Party, and the soon-to-be Australian Pirate Party.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231262</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230462</id>
	<title>Re:Can sexual abuse take place in a virtual world</title>
	<author>xav\_jones</author>
	<datestamp>1257155760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet?"

Err NO, exactly ZERO (0) children have ever been sexually abused by the internet.</p></div><p>The word "by" here could also be interpreted as "via", meaning that claim matches with your statement that the internet is a tool.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet ?
" Err NO , exactly ZERO ( 0 ) children have ever been sexually abused by the internet.The word " by " here could also be interpreted as " via " , meaning that claim matches with your statement that the internet is a tool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet?
"

Err NO, exactly ZERO (0) children have ever been sexually abused by the internet.The word "by" here could also be interpreted as "via", meaning that claim matches with your statement that the internet is a tool.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229282</id>
	<title>Re:How long until</title>
	<author>corbettw</author>
	<datestamp>1257193020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What would be the motivator for such a malicious act? There's no money to be gained, and if they were caught, they'd have the book thrown at them.</p></div><p>Yes, because those two attributes have kept criminals from ever doing anything malicious that didn't result in monetary profit sufficient to outweigh the possible jail time.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What would be the motivator for such a malicious act ?
There 's no money to be gained , and if they were caught , they 'd have the book thrown at them.Yes , because those two attributes have kept criminals from ever doing anything malicious that did n't result in monetary profit sufficient to outweigh the possible jail time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would be the motivator for such a malicious act?
There's no money to be gained, and if they were caught, they'd have the book thrown at them.Yes, because those two attributes have kept criminals from ever doing anything malicious that didn't result in monetary profit sufficient to outweigh the possible jail time.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228756</id>
	<title>There's already a panic button.</title>
	<author>Jason Levine</author>
	<datestamp>1257190740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's already a panic button on every desktop, laptop and netbook.  It's called the Power Button.  It will automatically disconnect you from whatever you were doing and turn off your computer.  Combine this with a talk with whatever parental figure(s) the child has (both before and after online access is granted) and kids should be covered.  Not every "think of the children" problem needs a government mandated solution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's already a panic button on every desktop , laptop and netbook .
It 's called the Power Button .
It will automatically disconnect you from whatever you were doing and turn off your computer .
Combine this with a talk with whatever parental figure ( s ) the child has ( both before and after online access is granted ) and kids should be covered .
Not every " think of the children " problem needs a government mandated solution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's already a panic button on every desktop, laptop and netbook.
It's called the Power Button.
It will automatically disconnect you from whatever you were doing and turn off your computer.
Combine this with a talk with whatever parental figure(s) the child has (both before and after online access is granted) and kids should be covered.
Not every "think of the children" problem needs a government mandated solution.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229952</id>
	<title>Grow Up (No, seriously.)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257153120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, no! Kids being bullied on the internet!<br> <br>

Seriously? If they're young enough to require this waste of money, then they shouldn't be using the bloody internet in the first place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , no !
Kids being bullied on the internet !
Seriously ? If they 're young enough to require this waste of money , then they should n't be using the bloody internet in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, no!
Kids being bullied on the internet!
Seriously? If they're young enough to require this waste of money, then they shouldn't be using the bloody internet in the first place.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229096</id>
	<title>I have just searched for "bear" in the comments.</title>
	<author>Alex Belits</author>
	<datestamp>1257192240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and found nothing.</p><p>NOTHING!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and found nothing.NOTHING !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and found nothing.NOTHING!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229198</id>
	<title>Re:How long until</title>
	<author>bugnuts</author>
	<datestamp>1257192720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't need a worm.  You need about a dozen 8yo's who like dolphins.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't need a worm .
You need about a dozen 8yo 's who like dolphins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't need a worm.
You need about a dozen 8yo's who like dolphins.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228766</id>
	<title>Laugh or Cry?</title>
	<author>2obvious4u</author>
	<datestamp>1257190800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know whether to laugh because it is so ridiculously stupid or to cry because whoever suggested it was serious.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know whether to laugh because it is so ridiculously stupid or to cry because whoever suggested it was serious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know whether to laugh because it is so ridiculously stupid or to cry because whoever suggested it was serious.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233998</id>
	<title>And the Children Shall... something.</title>
	<author>uid8472</author>
	<datestamp>1257185340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hail, hail, fire and snow.<br>
Call the dolphin; we will go.<br>
Far away, for to see,<br>
friendly dolphin, come to me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hail , hail , fire and snow .
Call the dolphin ; we will go .
Far away , for to see , friendly dolphin , come to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hail, hail, fire and snow.
Call the dolphin; we will go.
Far away, for to see,
friendly dolphin, come to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230716</id>
	<title>A Can of Worms</title>
	<author>karlwilson</author>
	<datestamp>1257157260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's what the button should be shaped like.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what the button should be shaped like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what the button should be shaped like.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230108</id>
	<title>More daft proposals for the sake of PR</title>
	<author>YankDownUnder</author>
	<datestamp>1257153900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is basically just a governmental response to keep the public pacified into thinking that THE GOVERNMENT is thinking about their safety and wellbeing online. Unfortunately, the case is more along the lines of "they don't really give a stuff and aren't really going to do much of anything because they're still not up-to-snuff about the entire sphere of technology and it's implications on society et al."

IF the Australian government REALLY wanted to make a show for protection of the Australian public, they'd enforce FAIR PRICING for internet access - starting with Telstra. THAT would have more TRUE impact than this type of tripe/BS/PR/Marketing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is basically just a governmental response to keep the public pacified into thinking that THE GOVERNMENT is thinking about their safety and wellbeing online .
Unfortunately , the case is more along the lines of " they do n't really give a stuff and are n't really going to do much of anything because they 're still not up-to-snuff about the entire sphere of technology and it 's implications on society et al .
" IF the Australian government REALLY wanted to make a show for protection of the Australian public , they 'd enforce FAIR PRICING for internet access - starting with Telstra .
THAT would have more TRUE impact than this type of tripe/BS/PR/Marketing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is basically just a governmental response to keep the public pacified into thinking that THE GOVERNMENT is thinking about their safety and wellbeing online.
Unfortunately, the case is more along the lines of "they don't really give a stuff and aren't really going to do much of anything because they're still not up-to-snuff about the entire sphere of technology and it's implications on society et al.
"

IF the Australian government REALLY wanted to make a show for protection of the Australian public, they'd enforce FAIR PRICING for internet access - starting with Telstra.
THAT would have more TRUE impact than this type of tripe/BS/PR/Marketing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231712</id>
	<title>I already have such a button.</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1257164400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On my computer, it looks like a circle interrupted at the top with a vertical line going up from the center.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On my computer , it looks like a circle interrupted at the top with a vertical line going up from the center .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On my computer, it looks like a circle interrupted at the top with a vertical line going up from the center.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228666</id>
	<title>Well, there's a silver lining</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257190440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least this looks to be somewhat close to (an attempt at a) solution for an actual problem, instead of blanket bans on "baaad content" that apply to everyone, not just those deemed unfit to stand up for themselves. If it gets the censor out of everyone else's hair I'm for it.</p><p>Still and all, kids have had to put up with bullying in school since whenever, right under the noses of strategically placed nearby teachers and there too most can learn to stand up for themselves. Maybe it's really hard for kids to ask their parents for help <i>with the internet</i>, though in following generations that may change. Growing a thicker skin is part of growing up, so why won't we let our kids do exactly that?</p><p>A national panic button, just because <i>a few</i> kids, boys and girls alike, managed to get lured into whatever it was that made the news last week? Because that's what we're talking about. How many incidents on how many kids with access to the internet in the entire country? Well? How many?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least this looks to be somewhat close to ( an attempt at a ) solution for an actual problem , instead of blanket bans on " baaad content " that apply to everyone , not just those deemed unfit to stand up for themselves .
If it gets the censor out of everyone else 's hair I 'm for it.Still and all , kids have had to put up with bullying in school since whenever , right under the noses of strategically placed nearby teachers and there too most can learn to stand up for themselves .
Maybe it 's really hard for kids to ask their parents for help with the internet , though in following generations that may change .
Growing a thicker skin is part of growing up , so why wo n't we let our kids do exactly that ? A national panic button , just because a few kids , boys and girls alike , managed to get lured into whatever it was that made the news last week ?
Because that 's what we 're talking about .
How many incidents on how many kids with access to the internet in the entire country ?
Well ? How many ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least this looks to be somewhat close to (an attempt at a) solution for an actual problem, instead of blanket bans on "baaad content" that apply to everyone, not just those deemed unfit to stand up for themselves.
If it gets the censor out of everyone else's hair I'm for it.Still and all, kids have had to put up with bullying in school since whenever, right under the noses of strategically placed nearby teachers and there too most can learn to stand up for themselves.
Maybe it's really hard for kids to ask their parents for help with the internet, though in following generations that may change.
Growing a thicker skin is part of growing up, so why won't we let our kids do exactly that?A national panic button, just because a few kids, boys and girls alike, managed to get lured into whatever it was that made the news last week?
Because that's what we're talking about.
How many incidents on how many kids with access to the internet in the entire country?
Well? How many?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229310</id>
	<title>What could possibly go wrong...</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1257193140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'Cause, like ya, that won't be totally abused to the point of uselessness.</p><p>Instead of cute dolphin, about about a really really sad wolf crying...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'Cause , like ya , that wo n't be totally abused to the point of uselessness.Instead of cute dolphin , about about a really really sad wolf crying.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Cause, like ya, that won't be totally abused to the point of uselessness.Instead of cute dolphin, about about a really really sad wolf crying...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233240</id>
	<title>Re:I'd like to suggest a novel approach</title>
	<author>dbIII</author>
	<datestamp>1257176700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>My suggestion is that we bring back personal responsibility</p></div></blockquote><p>It's a consequece of funding cuts to education which has produced the majority of a generation that really doesn't know that they should be responsible for their own actions, as well as poor leadership which has allowed many very high profile examples demonstrating how you can takes the risks and others take the fall for you.  We've lost this generation and it's going to be harder to influence the next with all the bad examples out there, and it's going to cost.  You can't have a "low tax state" without low tax outcomes in a lot more areas than just poor spelling.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My suggestion is that we bring back personal responsibilityIt 's a consequece of funding cuts to education which has produced the majority of a generation that really does n't know that they should be responsible for their own actions , as well as poor leadership which has allowed many very high profile examples demonstrating how you can takes the risks and others take the fall for you .
We 've lost this generation and it 's going to be harder to influence the next with all the bad examples out there , and it 's going to cost .
You ca n't have a " low tax state " without low tax outcomes in a lot more areas than just poor spelling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My suggestion is that we bring back personal responsibilityIt's a consequece of funding cuts to education which has produced the majority of a generation that really doesn't know that they should be responsible for their own actions, as well as poor leadership which has allowed many very high profile examples demonstrating how you can takes the risks and others take the fall for you.
We've lost this generation and it's going to be harder to influence the next with all the bad examples out there, and it's going to cost.
You can't have a "low tax state" without low tax outcomes in a lot more areas than just poor spelling.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230940</id>
	<title>National Whining Center</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1257158880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I'd be a lot more impressed if there was a button to push for "report fraud", with at least as much effort behind it.
After all, by dollar volume, most crime is on line now.  Breaking into houses is so last-cen.  (TVs are now either too big to carry or too worthless to bother. Used furniture, clothes, and appliances have near zero value.  And who has expensive jewelry any more?)  Stealing cars is getting hard; the vehicle electronics won't cooperate and may fight back. Robbing banks just gets you a very short career on TV. But financial fraud is at an all-time high.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be a lot more impressed if there was a button to push for " report fraud " , with at least as much effort behind it .
After all , by dollar volume , most crime is on line now .
Breaking into houses is so last-cen .
( TVs are now either too big to carry or too worthless to bother .
Used furniture , clothes , and appliances have near zero value .
And who has expensive jewelry any more ?
) Stealing cars is getting hard ; the vehicle electronics wo n't cooperate and may fight back .
Robbing banks just gets you a very short career on TV .
But financial fraud is at an all-time high .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I'd be a lot more impressed if there was a button to push for "report fraud", with at least as much effort behind it.
After all, by dollar volume, most crime is on line now.
Breaking into houses is so last-cen.
(TVs are now either too big to carry or too worthless to bother.
Used furniture, clothes, and appliances have near zero value.
And who has expensive jewelry any more?
)  Stealing cars is getting hard; the vehicle electronics won't cooperate and may fight back.
Robbing banks just gets you a very short career on TV.
But financial fraud is at an all-time high.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228706</id>
	<title>I wonder if they told the police...</title>
	<author>stagg</author>
	<datestamp>1257190560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if they told the police... cause your average 911 line is going to be just thrilled if this starts automatically forwarding whiny kids to them. I guess it could be a huge make work project for social work grad students, god help them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if they told the police... cause your average 911 line is going to be just thrilled if this starts automatically forwarding whiny kids to them .
I guess it could be a huge make work project for social work grad students , god help them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if they told the police... cause your average 911 line is going to be just thrilled if this starts automatically forwarding whiny kids to them.
I guess it could be a huge make work project for social work grad students, god help them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234384</id>
	<title>Re:Definitely questions for...</title>
	<author>pinkushun</author>
	<datestamp>1257190980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like those options. Plus its not like life had a panic button before the net existed!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like those options .
Plus its not like life had a panic button before the net existed !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like those options.
Plus its not like life had a panic button before the net existed!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30235886</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>wdef</author>
	<datestamp>1259240100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, well, it's the same stupid government there with the same stupid think-of-the-children -or terrorists-so-we-can-implement-more-oppressive-shit agenda as the dangerous morons in the UK.  Unfortunately the opposition don't look any better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , well , it 's the same stupid government there with the same stupid think-of-the-children -or terrorists-so-we-can-implement-more-oppressive-shit agenda as the dangerous morons in the UK .
Unfortunately the opposition do n't look any better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, well, it's the same stupid government there with the same stupid think-of-the-children -or terrorists-so-we-can-implement-more-oppressive-shit agenda as the dangerous morons in the UK.
Unfortunately the opposition don't look any better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234414</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet is not Real Life</title>
	<author>Malc</author>
	<datestamp>1257191640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cyber bully is often an extension of real life.  A child might be frightened to go to school after that something that happens online when they're back at thome.  In fact cyber bullying can be worse because it does mean that there is no escape.  Giving another option to children to discuss this issue can only be a good thing.  There are already a number of groups already out there suited to helping in this situation that already operate for example by phone, without it being a 000/911/999 emergency call thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cyber bully is often an extension of real life .
A child might be frightened to go to school after that something that happens online when they 're back at thome .
In fact cyber bullying can be worse because it does mean that there is no escape .
Giving another option to children to discuss this issue can only be a good thing .
There are already a number of groups already out there suited to helping in this situation that already operate for example by phone , without it being a 000/911/999 emergency call thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cyber bully is often an extension of real life.
A child might be frightened to go to school after that something that happens online when they're back at thome.
In fact cyber bullying can be worse because it does mean that there is no escape.
Giving another option to children to discuss this issue can only be a good thing.
There are already a number of groups already out there suited to helping in this situation that already operate for example by phone, without it being a 000/911/999 emergency call thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231348</id>
	<title>Re:Definitely questions for...</title>
	<author>ZarathustraDK</author>
	<datestamp>1257161880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey, who wouldn't want a direct line to the Waaahbulance?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , who would n't want a direct line to the Waaahbulance ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, who wouldn't want a direct line to the Waaahbulance?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230660</id>
	<title>Me, too!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257156900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I searched!  I found one, AND IT WAS YOURS!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I searched !
I found one , AND IT WAS YOURS !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I searched!
I found one, AND IT WAS YOURS!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230434</id>
	<title>Re:Define "sexual abuse"</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1257155640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In all fairness, in most environments that would be considered "victim of sexual abuse".<br>As would a girl asking a guy to show her his penis.</p><p>the study Haselton talks about is also flawed. More study is needed, but lets not blindly bash NCMEC. While they should never be given a fee pass, they do good work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In all fairness , in most environments that would be considered " victim of sexual abuse " .As would a girl asking a guy to show her his penis.the study Haselton talks about is also flawed .
More study is needed , but lets not blindly bash NCMEC .
While they should never be given a fee pass , they do good work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In all fairness, in most environments that would be considered "victim of sexual abuse".As would a girl asking a guy to show her his penis.the study Haselton talks about is also flawed.
More study is needed, but lets not blindly bash NCMEC.
While they should never be given a fee pass, they do good work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229212</id>
	<title>000</title>
	<author>dandart</author>
	<datestamp>1257192720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's 000? I'm British.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's 000 ?
I 'm British .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's 000?
I'm British.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232228</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257168600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/04/11/1081621834807.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/04/11/1081621834807.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/04/11/1081621834807.html</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233520</id>
	<title>Re:</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1257179400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The BLOWHOLE????</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The BLOWHOLE ? ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The BLOWHOLE???
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229924</id>
	<title>Re:Definitely questions for...</title>
	<author>aflag</author>
	<datestamp>1257152940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't agree with your rant. As a parent I rather educate than forbid. So telling a child about how things work on the Internet, what sort of things will happen and so on should be enough.</p><p>I have browsed and seen much of the dirty things that go on in the web. I've seen the memes, I've seen the raids, etc. So it might be easier for me to teach. Probably that has an influence on how much relaxed I am about educating about the web instead of forbidding. There's something else, though. I'm probably much more relaxed about sex than most of our society.</p><p>I believe that what people are scared the most is about children, early teens and even teenagers exploring sex. Somehow that freaks people out. It doesn't for me. I see no problem with those groups of people watching porn on the web or even exposing themselves. Of course, they need to be educated about what society thinks of those acts, so they don't fall in society's traps. Moreover, I don't believe at all that you can ruin someone's life because of something he or she published or watched on the web. I really can't.</p><p>Educate your children, let them live their lives. There will be mistakes, regrets, that's for sure. But I think it's better to make a mistake and realize it early rather than later. I think skateboarding poses more risks for a child's future than anything she can do on the web; and no, I don't want to forbid skateboards.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't agree with your rant .
As a parent I rather educate than forbid .
So telling a child about how things work on the Internet , what sort of things will happen and so on should be enough.I have browsed and seen much of the dirty things that go on in the web .
I 've seen the memes , I 've seen the raids , etc .
So it might be easier for me to teach .
Probably that has an influence on how much relaxed I am about educating about the web instead of forbidding .
There 's something else , though .
I 'm probably much more relaxed about sex than most of our society.I believe that what people are scared the most is about children , early teens and even teenagers exploring sex .
Somehow that freaks people out .
It does n't for me .
I see no problem with those groups of people watching porn on the web or even exposing themselves .
Of course , they need to be educated about what society thinks of those acts , so they do n't fall in society 's traps .
Moreover , I do n't believe at all that you can ruin someone 's life because of something he or she published or watched on the web .
I really ca n't.Educate your children , let them live their lives .
There will be mistakes , regrets , that 's for sure .
But I think it 's better to make a mistake and realize it early rather than later .
I think skateboarding poses more risks for a child 's future than anything she can do on the web ; and no , I do n't want to forbid skateboards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't agree with your rant.
As a parent I rather educate than forbid.
So telling a child about how things work on the Internet, what sort of things will happen and so on should be enough.I have browsed and seen much of the dirty things that go on in the web.
I've seen the memes, I've seen the raids, etc.
So it might be easier for me to teach.
Probably that has an influence on how much relaxed I am about educating about the web instead of forbidding.
There's something else, though.
I'm probably much more relaxed about sex than most of our society.I believe that what people are scared the most is about children, early teens and even teenagers exploring sex.
Somehow that freaks people out.
It doesn't for me.
I see no problem with those groups of people watching porn on the web or even exposing themselves.
Of course, they need to be educated about what society thinks of those acts, so they don't fall in society's traps.
Moreover, I don't believe at all that you can ruin someone's life because of something he or she published or watched on the web.
I really can't.Educate your children, let them live their lives.
There will be mistakes, regrets, that's for sure.
But I think it's better to make a mistake and realize it early rather than later.
I think skateboarding poses more risks for a child's future than anything she can do on the web; and no, I don't want to forbid skateboards.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231448</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is wrong with Australia?</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1257162300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You mean, what is wrong with Australia that isn't adequately explained by it being largely populated with British criminals and rebels? I think they'd do better if they elected only Aborigines to office...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean , what is wrong with Australia that is n't adequately explained by it being largely populated with British criminals and rebels ?
I think they 'd do better if they elected only Aborigines to office.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean, what is wrong with Australia that isn't adequately explained by it being largely populated with British criminals and rebels?
I think they'd do better if they elected only Aborigines to office...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228682</id>
	<title>Why a friendly dolphin?</title>
	<author>XSpud</author>
	<datestamp>1257190500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd think a lot of kids would just click on a dolphin icon just because this represents something "good".</p><p>Shouldn't the icon be something that the average kid knows to be representative of "bad"? Like spinach or something?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd think a lot of kids would just click on a dolphin icon just because this represents something " good " .Should n't the icon be something that the average kid knows to be representative of " bad " ?
Like spinach or something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd think a lot of kids would just click on a dolphin icon just because this represents something "good".Shouldn't the icon be something that the average kid knows to be representative of "bad"?
Like spinach or something?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229618</id>
	<title>A waste of time.</title>
	<author>newtown1100</author>
	<datestamp>1257194580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And money. And government resources. etc etc. The list goes on.</p><p>But really, is this a joke? Hope to god it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And money .
And government resources .
etc etc .
The list goes on.But really , is this a joke ?
Hope to god it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And money.
And government resources.
etc etc.
The list goes on.But really, is this a joke?
Hope to god it is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229278</id>
	<title>Re:How long until</title>
	<author>WCguru42</author>
	<datestamp>1257193020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What would be the motivator for such a malicious act?</p></div><p>What, you haven't heard?  The internet is full of assholes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What would be the motivator for such a malicious act ? What , you have n't heard ?
The internet is full of assholes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would be the motivator for such a malicious act?What, you haven't heard?
The internet is full of assholes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229742</id>
	<title>Define "sexual abuse"</title>
	<author>Brian Ribbon</author>
	<datestamp>1257195240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"<i>Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet?</i>"</p><p>If you ask organisations such as the NCMEC - who know that their funding depends on misinformed hysteria over children's safety - one in five children are sexually abused online. The reality is that the NCMEC and similar organisations use bizarre definitions of child abuse, so if a 13 year boy asks a 13 year old girl to show her breasts, the girl is reported to be a "victim of sexual abuse".</p><p>Most studies on this topic are remarkably biased (for financial reasons, or because they have been commissioned by governments) and based upon grossly inappropriate methodologies, so that question will probably never be answered. Consider Bennett Haselton's article <a href="http://interviews.slashdot.org/interviews/08/02/26/1322248.shtml" title="slashdot.org">article</a> [slashdot.org] about NCMEC "research" as an example of how such data is biased.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet ?
" If you ask organisations such as the NCMEC - who know that their funding depends on misinformed hysteria over children 's safety - one in five children are sexually abused online .
The reality is that the NCMEC and similar organisations use bizarre definitions of child abuse , so if a 13 year boy asks a 13 year old girl to show her breasts , the girl is reported to be a " victim of sexual abuse " .Most studies on this topic are remarkably biased ( for financial reasons , or because they have been commissioned by governments ) and based upon grossly inappropriate methodologies , so that question will probably never be answered .
Consider Bennett Haselton 's article article [ slashdot.org ] about NCMEC " research " as an example of how such data is biased .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Are 1 in 4 children really sexually abused by the Internet?
"If you ask organisations such as the NCMEC - who know that their funding depends on misinformed hysteria over children's safety - one in five children are sexually abused online.
The reality is that the NCMEC and similar organisations use bizarre definitions of child abuse, so if a 13 year boy asks a 13 year old girl to show her breasts, the girl is reported to be a "victim of sexual abuse".Most studies on this topic are remarkably biased (for financial reasons, or because they have been commissioned by governments) and based upon grossly inappropriate methodologies, so that question will probably never be answered.
Consider Bennett Haselton's article article [slashdot.org] about NCMEC "research" as an example of how such data is biased.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228738</id>
	<title>About to Press the Friendly Dolphin in 3... 2... 1</title>
	<author>Wowlapalooza</author>
	<datestamp>1257190740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Halp! Halp! I'm being groomed online!</p><p>Oh, wait, I just remembered I'm a forty-something guy, instead of a 12-year-old girl. Maybe I just misinterpreted something somebody said, or maybe my luck is actually turning for the better...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Halp !
Halp ! I 'm being groomed online ! Oh , wait , I just remembered I 'm a forty-something guy , instead of a 12-year-old girl .
Maybe I just misinterpreted something somebody said , or maybe my luck is actually turning for the better.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Halp!
Halp! I'm being groomed online!Oh, wait, I just remembered I'm a forty-something guy, instead of a 12-year-old girl.
Maybe I just misinterpreted something somebody said, or maybe my luck is actually turning for the better...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228696</id>
	<title>Put your finger in the blowhole</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257190560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The dolphin thing is a little too weird.</p><p>I think the little tykes should punch the monkey.</p><p>Or perhaps it might be a little more taxpayer effective to just re-purpose all those old turbo buttons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The dolphin thing is a little too weird.I think the little tykes should punch the monkey.Or perhaps it might be a little more taxpayer effective to just re-purpose all those old turbo buttons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The dolphin thing is a little too weird.I think the little tykes should punch the monkey.Or perhaps it might be a little more taxpayer effective to just re-purpose all those old turbo buttons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231592</id>
	<title>Re:Definitely questions for...</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1257163320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember my first happy.jpg</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember my first happy.jpg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember my first happy.jpg</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234358</id>
	<title>Its for the chiiiilllldrennnnn!!!</title>
	<author>leereyno</author>
	<datestamp>1257190500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are people in this world who dream of lording themselves over others.  This is just another scheme that they have cooked up using the tried and tested method of presenting that which they wish to control as a threat to children, with the remedy being that they are given more power.</p><p>This is horseshit and the people who are proposing it should be beaten to death with a tire iron.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are people in this world who dream of lording themselves over others .
This is just another scheme that they have cooked up using the tried and tested method of presenting that which they wish to control as a threat to children , with the remedy being that they are given more power.This is horseshit and the people who are proposing it should be beaten to death with a tire iron .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are people in this world who dream of lording themselves over others.
This is just another scheme that they have cooked up using the tried and tested method of presenting that which they wish to control as a threat to children, with the remedy being that they are given more power.This is horseshit and the people who are proposing it should be beaten to death with a tire iron.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228794</id>
	<title>Oh honestly now...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257190920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How can Dolphins save you from the net when they get caught in them all time?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How can Dolphins save you from the net when they get caught in them all time ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can Dolphins save you from the net when they get caught in them all time?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232472</id>
	<title>Re:Definitely questions for...Christmas gifts..</title>
	<author>coolforsale126</author>
	<datestamp>1257170160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com]  Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival. Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services". Your satisfaction is our main pursue. You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products . Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing! Welcome to come next time ! Thank you!http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76 (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!! Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello , In order to meet Christmas , Site launched Christmas spree , welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises , look forward to your arrival .
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is " Best quality , Best reputation , Best services " .
Your satisfaction is our main pursue .
You can find the best products from us , meeting your different needs.Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but do n't miss it.Select your favorite clothing !
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you ! http : //www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp ? id = s76 ( Tracksuit w ) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket , Air jordan ( 1-24 ) shoes $ 33 Nike shox ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) $ 35 Handbags ( Coach lv fendi d&amp;g ) $ 35 Tshirts ( Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste ) $ 16 free shipping Thanks ! ! !
Advance wish you a merry Christmas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com]  Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival.
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services".
Your satisfaction is our main pursue.
You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing!
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you!http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76 (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!!
Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229088</id>
	<title>Re:Definitely questions for...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257192240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Based on the replies below, I think we've come to a solid consensus...  It's option 1.</p><p>IMHO 1 in 4 children are copiously ridiculed, harassed, and are treated poorly...  I'd even argue that some arguments here can get downright mean...  And yet, here we are every day.</p><p>If someone takes the trolling and flaming as bullying, they've been bullied.  They can learn to live with it, or they can go somewhere else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Based on the replies below , I think we 've come to a solid consensus... It 's option 1.IMHO 1 in 4 children are copiously ridiculed , harassed , and are treated poorly... I 'd even argue that some arguments here can get downright mean... And yet , here we are every day.If someone takes the trolling and flaming as bullying , they 've been bullied .
They can learn to live with it , or they can go somewhere else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Based on the replies below, I think we've come to a solid consensus...  It's option 1.IMHO 1 in 4 children are copiously ridiculed, harassed, and are treated poorly...  I'd even argue that some arguments here can get downright mean...  And yet, here we are every day.If someone takes the trolling and flaming as bullying, they've been bullied.
They can learn to live with it, or they can go somewhere else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229004</id>
	<title>Re:How long until</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257191760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How long then until a worm emerges that floods the govt with hundreds of thousands of fradulent calls, making the signal to noise ratio too burdensome to navigate?</p></div><p>What would be the motivator for such a malicious act? There's no money to be gained, and if they were caught, they'd have the book thrown at them. Frankly, if someone tried this I wouldn't be surprised if the criminal community "policed itself" and put the poor bastard out of his misery out of fear of unwanted attention/legislation.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How long then until a worm emerges that floods the govt with hundreds of thousands of fradulent calls , making the signal to noise ratio too burdensome to navigate ? What would be the motivator for such a malicious act ?
There 's no money to be gained , and if they were caught , they 'd have the book thrown at them .
Frankly , if someone tried this I would n't be surprised if the criminal community " policed itself " and put the poor bastard out of his misery out of fear of unwanted attention/legislation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long then until a worm emerges that floods the govt with hundreds of thousands of fradulent calls, making the signal to noise ratio too burdensome to navigate?What would be the motivator for such a malicious act?
There's no money to be gained, and if they were caught, they'd have the book thrown at them.
Frankly, if someone tried this I wouldn't be surprised if the criminal community "policed itself" and put the poor bastard out of his misery out of fear of unwanted attention/legislation.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229060</id>
	<title>Stop now.</title>
	<author>Xeno man</author>
	<datestamp>1257192000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What a complete waste of time, money and  resources. They will spend a few years deciding on parameters, spending money on consultants for a few more years, spend more money building a center somewhere, hiring and training agents, millions on hardware and proprietary software, once it is done, another year to get it to actually work, then when it's running there will be a rash of false alarms and confusion, clarification on when children should use the system, millions spent on an informational campaign educating the public on how to correctly use the system all before the system is scraped entirely and called a big waste of money and a complete failure.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What a complete waste of time , money and resources .
They will spend a few years deciding on parameters , spending money on consultants for a few more years , spend more money building a center somewhere , hiring and training agents , millions on hardware and proprietary software , once it is done , another year to get it to actually work , then when it 's running there will be a rash of false alarms and confusion , clarification on when children should use the system , millions spent on an informational campaign educating the public on how to correctly use the system all before the system is scraped entirely and called a big waste of money and a complete failure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a complete waste of time, money and  resources.
They will spend a few years deciding on parameters, spending money on consultants for a few more years, spend more money building a center somewhere, hiring and training agents, millions on hardware and proprietary software, once it is done, another year to get it to actually work, then when it's running there will be a rash of false alarms and confusion, clarification on when children should use the system, millions spent on an informational campaign educating the public on how to correctly use the system all before the system is scraped entirely and called a big waste of money and a complete failure.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229704</id>
	<title>Police or Animal Control?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257195060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who will be dispatched when my cat steps on the power button?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who will be dispatched when my cat steps on the power button ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who will be dispatched when my cat steps on the power button?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232426</id>
	<title>Re:The government has the most experience</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257169920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>right, cause no one got fucked by bankers who bought the government.  you've got it backwards.  government can work if it is the people as opposed to an exclusively bought power broker club.</htmltext>
<tokenext>right , cause no one got fucked by bankers who bought the government .
you 've got it backwards .
government can work if it is the people as opposed to an exclusively bought power broker club .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>right, cause no one got fucked by bankers who bought the government.
you've got it backwards.
government can work if it is the people as opposed to an exclusively bought power broker club.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229478</id>
	<title>Re:Definitely questions for...</title>
	<author>sunderland56</author>
	<datestamp>1257193860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>My younger brothers know not to call 911 unless it is a real emergency.</p></div><p>
My cat can't dial 911. However, my cat can accidentally walk on my keyboard and press the 911 key.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My younger brothers know not to call 911 unless it is a real emergency .
My cat ca n't dial 911 .
However , my cat can accidentally walk on my keyboard and press the 911 key .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My younger brothers know not to call 911 unless it is a real emergency.
My cat can't dial 911.
However, my cat can accidentally walk on my keyboard and press the 911 key.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30238180</id>
	<title>Re:</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1259260200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"1 in 4 children are sexually abused by the internet."</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" 1 in 4 children are sexually abused by the internet .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"1 in 4 children are sexually abused by the internet.
"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229106</id>
	<title>Boogie man</title>
	<author>zazenation</author>
	<datestamp>1257192300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good idea -- incorrect routing.</p><p>Have the dolphin button ring the parents cell phone with a message like:<br>"(Kid's name) is having an Internet Panic Attack --- If you don't respond to this message, then the call will be routed to your local law enforcement division -- Remember, please monitor and talk with your children!"</p><p>Supply a pager to the parents without a cell phone. Seems like a far less costly method than having to hire thousands of police and/or SS workers to handle the plethora of "I wanna see someone jump when I feel bad" abusers.</p><p>And don't forget the legions of lawyers that will be necessary to sort through the pile of litigation!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good idea -- incorrect routing.Have the dolphin button ring the parents cell phone with a message like : " ( Kid 's name ) is having an Internet Panic Attack --- If you do n't respond to this message , then the call will be routed to your local law enforcement division -- Remember , please monitor and talk with your children !
" Supply a pager to the parents without a cell phone .
Seems like a far less costly method than having to hire thousands of police and/or SS workers to handle the plethora of " I wan na see someone jump when I feel bad " abusers.And do n't forget the legions of lawyers that will be necessary to sort through the pile of litigation !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good idea -- incorrect routing.Have the dolphin button ring the parents cell phone with a message like:"(Kid's name) is having an Internet Panic Attack --- If you don't respond to this message, then the call will be routed to your local law enforcement division -- Remember, please monitor and talk with your children!
"Supply a pager to the parents without a cell phone.
Seems like a far less costly method than having to hire thousands of police and/or SS workers to handle the plethora of "I wanna see someone jump when I feel bad" abusers.And don't forget the legions of lawyers that will be necessary to sort through the pile of litigation!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231194</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet is not Real Life</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257160860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I don't say this to be mean -- I say this because the other thing a rural upbringing gave me was a lack of tact.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div></blockquote><p>Don't cushion the blow. Be mean. Any parent willing to install this thing needs their ass kicked more often. We need less pussies in this world and more people with guts. Anyone giving their kids this thing is the former, not the latter. The only way to move from one to the other is to be subjected to abuse and hardship, and learn to handle it yourself instead of running crying to the authorities every time things get hard.</p><p>-- An even less tactful bastard</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't say this to be mean -- I say this because the other thing a rural upbringing gave me was a lack of tact .
; ) Do n't cushion the blow .
Be mean .
Any parent willing to install this thing needs their ass kicked more often .
We need less pussies in this world and more people with guts .
Anyone giving their kids this thing is the former , not the latter .
The only way to move from one to the other is to be subjected to abuse and hardship , and learn to handle it yourself instead of running crying to the authorities every time things get hard.-- An even less tactful bastard</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't say this to be mean -- I say this because the other thing a rural upbringing gave me was a lack of tact.
;)Don't cushion the blow.
Be mean.
Any parent willing to install this thing needs their ass kicked more often.
We need less pussies in this world and more people with guts.
Anyone giving their kids this thing is the former, not the latter.
The only way to move from one to the other is to be subjected to abuse and hardship, and learn to handle it yourself instead of running crying to the authorities every time things get hard.-- An even less tactful bastard
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234284</id>
	<title>Already Exists</title>
	<author>Lordnerdzrool</author>
	<datestamp>1257189000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a little button, usually at the top right of your browser, that looks like an "X".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a little button , usually at the top right of your browser , that looks like an " X " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a little button, usually at the top right of your browser, that looks like an "X".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233586</id>
	<title>A Dolphin? You're kidding surely...</title>
	<author>fostware</author>
	<datestamp>1257180360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They pick a dolphin? the pack-rapist of the sea?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They pick a dolphin ?
the pack-rapist of the sea ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They pick a dolphin?
the pack-rapist of the sea?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231898</id>
	<title>Re:I'd like to suggest a novel approach</title>
	<author>hguorbray</author>
	<datestamp>1257166200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>oblig Futurama:<br>Have you ever thought about just turning off the tv...Sitting down with your children...and hitting them?" Bender Bending Rodriguez<br><br>-I'm just sayin'</htmltext>
<tokenext>oblig Futurama : Have you ever thought about just turning off the tv...Sitting down with your children...and hitting them ?
" Bender Bending Rodriguez-I 'm just sayin'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oblig Futurama:Have you ever thought about just turning off the tv...Sitting down with your children...and hitting them?
" Bender Bending Rodriguez-I'm just sayin'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229170</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet is not Real Life</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1257192600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you're getting bullied in real life, you have to try to run away and get help immediately before your attackers catch up with you and continue the beating.</p></div><p>You haven't been bullied, have you? You don't run -- it only encourages them. You turn into any attack -- 95\% of the time, that's the right answer. Bullies, muggers, rapists, etc., all have one thing in common: They go for the low hanging fruit.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Online, you can simply get off the computer and tell the proper authorities (be that the police or your parents or whoever) at your leisure. There is not the same need for immediacy.</p></div><p>Or, you know, you could ignore them. Or be a responsible parent to your child, instead of wasting taxpayer dollars chasing down every bad word someone else's kid says about yours.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Also, the whole idea of grooming children (or more often FBI agents posing as children) is that the pedophile gets the child to believe they're safe, and so they would have no motivation to push the little dolphin button. The kids that go off to meet pedophiles do so because they don't perceive that they're in any danger. If they don't perceive the danger, why would they alert the police to anything?</p></div><p>Grooming takes time. It doesn't just happen one evening while your child is propped up on the bed and you're having dinner, and the next day they're on a bus. A lack of parental supervision is the problem here -- if we were actually spending time parenting instead of working two jobs and leaving the child rearing to the schools, televisions, and computers, this wouldn't be possible.</p><p>This government solution isn't: <b>That friendly dolphin isn't there for the children, it's there for the parents.</b> So they can feel less guilty about not watching their kid. It's the same reason we have padded foam and rubber all over playgrounds, and the swing sets have been removed, along with all the other interesting things to do. Meanwhile, I used guns, went hunting, rode motorcycles, ATVs, and played hide and seek in a five acre field. Bullies didn't give me much trouble growing up -- rural girls scare the ever-living crap out of city boys.</p><p>Take a hint, parents: Raise your kids to be self-reliant and strong, and you'll never have to worry about their safety. But keep them as your precious snowflakes, and you'll raise a bunch of fragile weaklings that will spend their lives suckling the tit of the government and crumpling at every hardship. I don't say this to be mean -- I say this because the other thing a rural upbringing gave me was a lack of tact.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're getting bullied in real life , you have to try to run away and get help immediately before your attackers catch up with you and continue the beating.You have n't been bullied , have you ?
You do n't run -- it only encourages them .
You turn into any attack -- 95 \ % of the time , that 's the right answer .
Bullies , muggers , rapists , etc. , all have one thing in common : They go for the low hanging fruit.Online , you can simply get off the computer and tell the proper authorities ( be that the police or your parents or whoever ) at your leisure .
There is not the same need for immediacy.Or , you know , you could ignore them .
Or be a responsible parent to your child , instead of wasting taxpayer dollars chasing down every bad word someone else 's kid says about yours.Also , the whole idea of grooming children ( or more often FBI agents posing as children ) is that the pedophile gets the child to believe they 're safe , and so they would have no motivation to push the little dolphin button .
The kids that go off to meet pedophiles do so because they do n't perceive that they 're in any danger .
If they do n't perceive the danger , why would they alert the police to anything ? Grooming takes time .
It does n't just happen one evening while your child is propped up on the bed and you 're having dinner , and the next day they 're on a bus .
A lack of parental supervision is the problem here -- if we were actually spending time parenting instead of working two jobs and leaving the child rearing to the schools , televisions , and computers , this would n't be possible.This government solution is n't : That friendly dolphin is n't there for the children , it 's there for the parents .
So they can feel less guilty about not watching their kid .
It 's the same reason we have padded foam and rubber all over playgrounds , and the swing sets have been removed , along with all the other interesting things to do .
Meanwhile , I used guns , went hunting , rode motorcycles , ATVs , and played hide and seek in a five acre field .
Bullies did n't give me much trouble growing up -- rural girls scare the ever-living crap out of city boys.Take a hint , parents : Raise your kids to be self-reliant and strong , and you 'll never have to worry about their safety .
But keep them as your precious snowflakes , and you 'll raise a bunch of fragile weaklings that will spend their lives suckling the tit of the government and crumpling at every hardship .
I do n't say this to be mean -- I say this because the other thing a rural upbringing gave me was a lack of tact .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're getting bullied in real life, you have to try to run away and get help immediately before your attackers catch up with you and continue the beating.You haven't been bullied, have you?
You don't run -- it only encourages them.
You turn into any attack -- 95\% of the time, that's the right answer.
Bullies, muggers, rapists, etc., all have one thing in common: They go for the low hanging fruit.Online, you can simply get off the computer and tell the proper authorities (be that the police or your parents or whoever) at your leisure.
There is not the same need for immediacy.Or, you know, you could ignore them.
Or be a responsible parent to your child, instead of wasting taxpayer dollars chasing down every bad word someone else's kid says about yours.Also, the whole idea of grooming children (or more often FBI agents posing as children) is that the pedophile gets the child to believe they're safe, and so they would have no motivation to push the little dolphin button.
The kids that go off to meet pedophiles do so because they don't perceive that they're in any danger.
If they don't perceive the danger, why would they alert the police to anything?Grooming takes time.
It doesn't just happen one evening while your child is propped up on the bed and you're having dinner, and the next day they're on a bus.
A lack of parental supervision is the problem here -- if we were actually spending time parenting instead of working two jobs and leaving the child rearing to the schools, televisions, and computers, this wouldn't be possible.This government solution isn't: That friendly dolphin isn't there for the children, it's there for the parents.
So they can feel less guilty about not watching their kid.
It's the same reason we have padded foam and rubber all over playgrounds, and the swing sets have been removed, along with all the other interesting things to do.
Meanwhile, I used guns, went hunting, rode motorcycles, ATVs, and played hide and seek in a five acre field.
Bullies didn't give me much trouble growing up -- rural girls scare the ever-living crap out of city boys.Take a hint, parents: Raise your kids to be self-reliant and strong, and you'll never have to worry about their safety.
But keep them as your precious snowflakes, and you'll raise a bunch of fragile weaklings that will spend their lives suckling the tit of the government and crumpling at every hardship.
I don't say this to be mean -- I say this because the other thing a rural upbringing gave me was a lack of tact.
;)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228752</id>
	<title>What the 1 in 4 or 1 in 5 number actually means.</title>
	<author>JoshuaZ</author>
	<datestamp>1257190740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The way the large percentages for sexual propositioning/harassment on the internet are pretty misleading. In order to get that number they are counting fairly tame stuff such as mildly lewd comments from friends over IM and the like. For example, a teenager asking another teenager if the other was a virgin would count or possibly even asking "hey, did you end up making out with that cute guy." When one looks at what one would normally call a real problem, such as sexual solicitation by strangers and the like one gets under 3\%. See <a href="http://www.csicop.org/si/show/predator\_panic\_a\_closer\_look/" title="csicop.org">http://www.csicop.org/si/show/predator\_panic\_a\_closer\_look/</a> [csicop.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>The way the large percentages for sexual propositioning/harassment on the internet are pretty misleading .
In order to get that number they are counting fairly tame stuff such as mildly lewd comments from friends over IM and the like .
For example , a teenager asking another teenager if the other was a virgin would count or possibly even asking " hey , did you end up making out with that cute guy .
" When one looks at what one would normally call a real problem , such as sexual solicitation by strangers and the like one gets under 3 \ % .
See http : //www.csicop.org/si/show/predator \ _panic \ _a \ _closer \ _look/ [ csicop.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The way the large percentages for sexual propositioning/harassment on the internet are pretty misleading.
In order to get that number they are counting fairly tame stuff such as mildly lewd comments from friends over IM and the like.
For example, a teenager asking another teenager if the other was a virgin would count or possibly even asking "hey, did you end up making out with that cute guy.
" When one looks at what one would normally call a real problem, such as sexual solicitation by strangers and the like one gets under 3\%.
See http://www.csicop.org/si/show/predator\_panic\_a\_closer\_look/ [csicop.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228946</id>
	<title>Hey boys and girls....</title>
	<author>unitron</author>
	<datestamp>1257191520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's a neat button and everytime you press it a bunch of cars with with flashing lights and screaming sirens will come zooming up to your house!</p><p>Reminds me of the diapers with the moisture sensors that played a little tune every time the kid needed changing, which was pretty often once the kids figured out how to make the music play.  : - )</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a neat button and everytime you press it a bunch of cars with with flashing lights and screaming sirens will come zooming up to your house ! Reminds me of the diapers with the moisture sensors that played a little tune every time the kid needed changing , which was pretty often once the kids figured out how to make the music play .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a neat button and everytime you press it a bunch of cars with with flashing lights and screaming sirens will come zooming up to your house!Reminds me of the diapers with the moisture sensors that played a little tune every time the kid needed changing, which was pretty often once the kids figured out how to make the music play.
: - )</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230000</id>
	<title>CPS</title>
	<author>frozentier</author>
	<datestamp>1257153300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The real solution is for the button to contact child protective services, and when the child presses the button, they ask where the parents are, and how often the child is left alone at the computer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The real solution is for the button to contact child protective services , and when the child presses the button , they ask where the parents are , and how often the child is left alone at the computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real solution is for the button to contact child protective services, and when the child presses the button, they ask where the parents are, and how often the child is left alone at the computer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228776</id>
	<title>Until virtual reality gets much, much better,</title>
	<author>Perp Atuitie</author>
	<datestamp>1257190860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>children cannot be abused by the internet.

My question is, how is it that the "defenders of children" never have a clue about children? How many law enforcement resources does Australia plan to throw at answering calls from kids who just wonder what the pretty button does, who think the police should arrest Bobby for calling him a troll, who get scared of the "2012" preview they stumbled onto, who just want to stir things up?

If we really want to "protect" kids we'd be better off banning idiocy like this and restricting parenthood to those with the capacity to do the job.</htmltext>
<tokenext>children can not be abused by the internet .
My question is , how is it that the " defenders of children " never have a clue about children ?
How many law enforcement resources does Australia plan to throw at answering calls from kids who just wonder what the pretty button does , who think the police should arrest Bobby for calling him a troll , who get scared of the " 2012 " preview they stumbled onto , who just want to stir things up ?
If we really want to " protect " kids we 'd be better off banning idiocy like this and restricting parenthood to those with the capacity to do the job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>children cannot be abused by the internet.
My question is, how is it that the "defenders of children" never have a clue about children?
How many law enforcement resources does Australia plan to throw at answering calls from kids who just wonder what the pretty button does, who think the police should arrest Bobby for calling him a troll, who get scared of the "2012" preview they stumbled onto, who just want to stir things up?
If we really want to "protect" kids we'd be better off banning idiocy like this and restricting parenthood to those with the capacity to do the job.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229598</id>
	<title>Re:I'd like to suggest a novel approach</title>
	<author>BlowHole666</author>
	<datestamp>1257194460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree man. 20 years ago we did not have this crap. I remember when I was in high school a kid kept stealing another guys seat and bullying him. So the kid got tired and knocked the crap out of him...after that day the kid never got bullied. <br> <br>
Parents wonder why their kids act so bad could it be that the entertainment sector keeps pushing the envelope because kids keep loosing interest in last years thing to have interest in the latest thing.<br> <br>
I mean think about it, we have a weight problem in America, why is this? We are stuck in front of our computers, our TVs, etc. This is because they are parenting devices and entertainment devices. We as adults make a choice to use these entertainment devices and because we are lazy we use these same entertainment devices on our children. Hence the reason why we have obese 5th graders. In the US we need to get back to basics and learn to turn off the electronic device and go outside.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree man .
20 years ago we did not have this crap .
I remember when I was in high school a kid kept stealing another guys seat and bullying him .
So the kid got tired and knocked the crap out of him...after that day the kid never got bullied .
Parents wonder why their kids act so bad could it be that the entertainment sector keeps pushing the envelope because kids keep loosing interest in last years thing to have interest in the latest thing .
I mean think about it , we have a weight problem in America , why is this ?
We are stuck in front of our computers , our TVs , etc .
This is because they are parenting devices and entertainment devices .
We as adults make a choice to use these entertainment devices and because we are lazy we use these same entertainment devices on our children .
Hence the reason why we have obese 5th graders .
In the US we need to get back to basics and learn to turn off the electronic device and go outside .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree man.
20 years ago we did not have this crap.
I remember when I was in high school a kid kept stealing another guys seat and bullying him.
So the kid got tired and knocked the crap out of him...after that day the kid never got bullied.
Parents wonder why their kids act so bad could it be that the entertainment sector keeps pushing the envelope because kids keep loosing interest in last years thing to have interest in the latest thing.
I mean think about it, we have a weight problem in America, why is this?
We are stuck in front of our computers, our TVs, etc.
This is because they are parenting devices and entertainment devices.
We as adults make a choice to use these entertainment devices and because we are lazy we use these same entertainment devices on our children.
Hence the reason why we have obese 5th graders.
In the US we need to get back to basics and learn to turn off the electronic device and go outside.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230104</id>
	<title>"Mom - Dad!!!"</title>
	<author>arthurpaliden</author>
	<datestamp>1257153900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There that was easy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There that was easy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There that was easy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230538</id>
	<title>Re:How long until</title>
	<author>aflag</author>
	<datestamp>1257156120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What would be the motivator for such a malicious act? There's no money to be gained, and if they were caught, they'd have the book thrown at them. Frankly, if someone tried this I wouldn't be surprised if the criminal community "policed itself" and put the poor bastard out of his misery out of fear of unwanted attention/legislation.</p></div><p>Dunno, man. Sounds like just fun vandalism. Sometimes you just do it for the lulz.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What would be the motivator for such a malicious act ?
There 's no money to be gained , and if they were caught , they 'd have the book thrown at them .
Frankly , if someone tried this I would n't be surprised if the criminal community " policed itself " and put the poor bastard out of his misery out of fear of unwanted attention/legislation.Dunno , man .
Sounds like just fun vandalism .
Sometimes you just do it for the lulz .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would be the motivator for such a malicious act?
There's no money to be gained, and if they were caught, they'd have the book thrown at them.
Frankly, if someone tried this I wouldn't be surprised if the criminal community "policed itself" and put the poor bastard out of his misery out of fear of unwanted attention/legislation.Dunno, man.
Sounds like just fun vandalism.
Sometimes you just do it for the lulz.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229004</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30242712
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232582
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231826
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30235886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30241464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231898
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30237862
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229598
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30240644
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229140
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233236
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_187249_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232926
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228696
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229072
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229212
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229004
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229278
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234166
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229282
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229298
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230538
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229242
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230596
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229140
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230626
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228918
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229170
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30240644
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230126
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230962
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229118
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229598
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233240
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228612
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228700
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229078
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229376
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229706
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228798
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30241464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229332
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230462
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230434
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232426
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228838
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30235886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231262
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233868
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30242712
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232566
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30233236
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30237862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232228
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230026
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229606
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228668
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228676
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30232472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30231592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229088
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30234384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30228638
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229478
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229720
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230146
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229994
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229924
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_187249.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30229384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_187249.30230464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
