<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_24_174259</id>
	<title>Police Arrest Man For Refusing To Tweet</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1259090280000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>RichZellich writes <i>"Police arrested a senior vice president from Island Def Jam Records, saying he hindered their crowd-control efforts by not cooperating.  The crowd at a mall where Justin Bieber was appearing got out of control, and police wanted the man to send a tweet asking for calm; he refused and <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091122/heres-a-first-man-arrested-for-not-using-twitter/">they arrested him on a felony assault charge</a> 'for putting people in danger.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>RichZellich writes " Police arrested a senior vice president from Island Def Jam Records , saying he hindered their crowd-control efforts by not cooperating .
The crowd at a mall where Justin Bieber was appearing got out of control , and police wanted the man to send a tweet asking for calm ; he refused and they arrested him on a felony assault charge 'for putting people in danger .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RichZellich writes "Police arrested a senior vice president from Island Def Jam Records, saying he hindered their crowd-control efforts by not cooperating.
The crowd at a mall where Justin Bieber was appearing got out of control, and police wanted the man to send a tweet asking for calm; he refused and they arrested him on a felony assault charge 'for putting people in danger.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218974</id>
	<title>Well</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1259058420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you READ the article you would know that he DID use twitter, to get even MORE people to come, RATHER then telling them to go away and/or not come anymore.
</p><p>I am afraid that there is a clear case here. The police had asked that the event be cancelled and had asked for a message to be sent on the same channel that people had been invited, that people be told to leave or not come in the first place.
</p><p>If a radio station was to announce an event on the radio asking for visitors to said radio station, then to many people show up and for everyones safety the event needs to be cancelled so fewer people will be there, is it unreasonable to ask the station to sent the message over the radio? No, that has been done and almost everyone would cooperate with such a request. Only a true asshole would FOR A PUBLICITY event, not cooperate with the police when things got out of control.
</p><p>This was NOT a protest march, not a political rally or anything of the sort. For commercial gains someone endangered public safety and refused to help the police with trying to bring the situation under control.
</p><p>Liberatarian nutcases on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. may scream bloody murder over this, but those of us with a brain can see what is going on because we can actually read articles before our brain shutsdown at the mere mention of the police.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you READ the article you would know that he DID use twitter , to get even MORE people to come , RATHER then telling them to go away and/or not come anymore .
I am afraid that there is a clear case here .
The police had asked that the event be cancelled and had asked for a message to be sent on the same channel that people had been invited , that people be told to leave or not come in the first place .
If a radio station was to announce an event on the radio asking for visitors to said radio station , then to many people show up and for everyones safety the event needs to be cancelled so fewer people will be there , is it unreasonable to ask the station to sent the message over the radio ?
No , that has been done and almost everyone would cooperate with such a request .
Only a true asshole would FOR A PUBLICITY event , not cooperate with the police when things got out of control .
This was NOT a protest march , not a political rally or anything of the sort .
For commercial gains someone endangered public safety and refused to help the police with trying to bring the situation under control .
Liberatarian nutcases on / .
may scream bloody murder over this , but those of us with a brain can see what is going on because we can actually read articles before our brain shutsdown at the mere mention of the police .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you READ the article you would know that he DID use twitter, to get even MORE people to come, RATHER then telling them to go away and/or not come anymore.
I am afraid that there is a clear case here.
The police had asked that the event be cancelled and had asked for a message to be sent on the same channel that people had been invited, that people be told to leave or not come in the first place.
If a radio station was to announce an event on the radio asking for visitors to said radio station, then to many people show up and for everyones safety the event needs to be cancelled so fewer people will be there, is it unreasonable to ask the station to sent the message over the radio?
No, that has been done and almost everyone would cooperate with such a request.
Only a true asshole would FOR A PUBLICITY event, not cooperate with the police when things got out of control.
This was NOT a protest march, not a political rally or anything of the sort.
For commercial gains someone endangered public safety and refused to help the police with trying to bring the situation under control.
Liberatarian nutcases on /.
may scream bloody murder over this, but those of us with a brain can see what is going on because we can actually read articles before our brain shutsdown at the mere mention of the police.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30220946</id>
	<title>Re:It was a near riot of teenage girls!</title>
	<author>yurtinus</author>
	<datestamp>1259068140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We could probably conduct several studies and publish our results in peer reviewed sociology journals that will support this statement. +1 Informative!</htmltext>
<tokenext>We could probably conduct several studies and publish our results in peer reviewed sociology journals that will support this statement .
+ 1 Informative !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We could probably conduct several studies and publish our results in peer reviewed sociology journals that will support this statement.
+1 Informative!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217816</id>
	<title>Re:Crap</title>
	<author>icebraining</author>
	<datestamp>1259053200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MOD PARENT UP.</p><p>Stupid summaries lead people to stupid conclusions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MOD PARENT UP.Stupid summaries lead people to stupid conclusions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MOD PARENT UP.Stupid summaries lead people to stupid conclusions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218838</id>
	<title>Re:Decisions, decisions...</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1259057940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;&gt;Do I side with the Fascist cops or the Nazi record exec?</p><p>Well since the government has the power to throw you in jail, draft you into the army and send you to your death (Vietnam/Afghanistan), and suck money directly from your paycheck..... and the record exec does not..... I side with the lesser of the two evils.</p><p>Besides even if I don't like someone, I will still demand their individual rights be respected.  People have rights.  Governments do not; governments are servants of the People.  The government should get down on its knees and Thank the People for allowing it to exist, rather than abolishing it completely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; &gt; Do I side with the Fascist cops or the Nazi record exec ? Well since the government has the power to throw you in jail , draft you into the army and send you to your death ( Vietnam/Afghanistan ) , and suck money directly from your paycheck..... and the record exec does not..... I side with the lesser of the two evils.Besides even if I do n't like someone , I will still demand their individual rights be respected .
People have rights .
Governments do not ; governments are servants of the People .
The government should get down on its knees and Thank the People for allowing it to exist , rather than abolishing it completely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;&gt;Do I side with the Fascist cops or the Nazi record exec?Well since the government has the power to throw you in jail, draft you into the army and send you to your death (Vietnam/Afghanistan), and suck money directly from your paycheck..... and the record exec does not..... I side with the lesser of the two evils.Besides even if I don't like someone, I will still demand their individual rights be respected.
People have rights.
Governments do not; governments are servants of the People.
The government should get down on its knees and Thank the People for allowing it to exist, rather than abolishing it completely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217710</id>
	<title>Re:old ways are still the best.</title>
	<author>CannonballHead</author>
	<datestamp>1259095980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People respect individuals far more than the police.  After all, we all know the police force is out to get you and is only there for nefarious reasons (like taking away your drugs or your fun).  Why should we listen to the police?</p><p>Seriously, I don't think this generation cares about the police.  We have decided that we'd rather rebel and follow some rich guy (put anyone's name in there, even a celebrity) than submit to an authority.</p><p>It's an "against the establishment" thing... doesn't particularly matter what "the establishment" is, actually.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People respect individuals far more than the police .
After all , we all know the police force is out to get you and is only there for nefarious reasons ( like taking away your drugs or your fun ) .
Why should we listen to the police ? Seriously , I do n't think this generation cares about the police .
We have decided that we 'd rather rebel and follow some rich guy ( put anyone 's name in there , even a celebrity ) than submit to an authority.It 's an " against the establishment " thing... does n't particularly matter what " the establishment " is , actually .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People respect individuals far more than the police.
After all, we all know the police force is out to get you and is only there for nefarious reasons (like taking away your drugs or your fun).
Why should we listen to the police?Seriously, I don't think this generation cares about the police.
We have decided that we'd rather rebel and follow some rich guy (put anyone's name in there, even a celebrity) than submit to an authority.It's an "against the establishment" thing... doesn't particularly matter what "the establishment" is, actually.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221676</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259073420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Sorry, despite freedom of speech and assembly, people don't have the right..."</p><p>There is obviously a line you draw on the number of people that can "assemble" (no matter the definition, a valid reason can be used).  Assembly under the constitution can be circumvented for public safety.  But, doesn't this open the door for a catch all law?  Laws are not supposed to be ambiguous, yet, the Constitution has "national security, territorial integrity, public safety" noted as a reason ditch it.  \_EVERYTHING YOU DO\_ is a risk to public safety.</p><p>Where would you draw the line (e.g. fire codes, anxiety, etc)?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Sorry , despite freedom of speech and assembly , people do n't have the right... " There is obviously a line you draw on the number of people that can " assemble " ( no matter the definition , a valid reason can be used ) .
Assembly under the constitution can be circumvented for public safety .
But , does n't this open the door for a catch all law ?
Laws are not supposed to be ambiguous , yet , the Constitution has " national security , territorial integrity , public safety " noted as a reason ditch it .
\ _EVERYTHING YOU DO \ _ is a risk to public safety.Where would you draw the line ( e.g .
fire codes , anxiety , etc ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Sorry, despite freedom of speech and assembly, people don't have the right..."There is obviously a line you draw on the number of people that can "assemble" (no matter the definition, a valid reason can be used).
Assembly under the constitution can be circumvented for public safety.
But, doesn't this open the door for a catch all law?
Laws are not supposed to be ambiguous, yet, the Constitution has "national security, territorial integrity, public safety" noted as a reason ditch it.
\_EVERYTHING YOU DO\_ is a risk to public safety.Where would you draw the line (e.g.
fire codes, anxiety, etc)?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218454</id>
	<title>Re:Now this is just Stupidity at its finest</title>
	<author>macbeth66</author>
	<datestamp>1259056320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cops are not exactly the brightest of the bunch.</p><p>Cops arrested a couple for theft at a restaurant.  <a href="http://media.www.thebrownandwhite.com/media/storage/paper1233/news/2009/11/20/News/Two-Local.Students.Arrested.For.Refusing.To.Tip.At.Lehigh.Pub-3837030.shtml" title="thebrownandwhite.com">http://media.www.thebrownandwhite.com/media/storage/paper1233/news/2009/11/20/News/Two-Local.Students.Arrested.For.Refusing.To.Tip.At.Lehigh.Pub-3837030.shtml</a> [thebrownandwhite.com]</p><p>As it turns out, the charges were dropped.  But they arrested someone for not paying a gratuity that was less than $20?  I can smell the lawsuits against the city coming.  At least the restuarant won't survive the year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cops are not exactly the brightest of the bunch.Cops arrested a couple for theft at a restaurant .
http : //media.www.thebrownandwhite.com/media/storage/paper1233/news/2009/11/20/News/Two-Local.Students.Arrested.For.Refusing.To.Tip.At.Lehigh.Pub-3837030.shtml [ thebrownandwhite.com ] As it turns out , the charges were dropped .
But they arrested someone for not paying a gratuity that was less than $ 20 ?
I can smell the lawsuits against the city coming .
At least the restuarant wo n't survive the year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cops are not exactly the brightest of the bunch.Cops arrested a couple for theft at a restaurant.
http://media.www.thebrownandwhite.com/media/storage/paper1233/news/2009/11/20/News/Two-Local.Students.Arrested.For.Refusing.To.Tip.At.Lehigh.Pub-3837030.shtml [thebrownandwhite.com]As it turns out, the charges were dropped.
But they arrested someone for not paying a gratuity that was less than $20?
I can smell the lawsuits against the city coming.
At least the restuarant won't survive the year.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218718</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>Nerdfest</author>
	<datestamp>1259057520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is the record company going to care? This is big, free publicity for some (most likely) low-talent act. Even if someone gets killed in a stanpede, it's unlikely that they'll be found guilty of anything<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and boy, would that sort of thing ever get their 'star' into the headlines.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is the record company going to care ?
This is big , free publicity for some ( most likely ) low-talent act .
Even if someone gets killed in a stanpede , it 's unlikely that they 'll be found guilty of anything ... and boy , would that sort of thing ever get their 'star ' into the headlines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is the record company going to care?
This is big, free publicity for some (most likely) low-talent act.
Even if someone gets killed in a stanpede, it's unlikely that they'll be found guilty of anything ... and boy, would that sort of thing ever get their 'star' into the headlines.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219784</id>
	<title>Crowded theater?</title>
	<author>WidgetGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1259062260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's see... Now I can get arrested for both shouting "Fire!" in a crowded theater and for <i>not</i> shouting "Fire!" in a crowded theater.  Man, this country's going to hell in an express hand basket.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's see... Now I can get arrested for both shouting " Fire !
" in a crowded theater and for not shouting " Fire !
" in a crowded theater .
Man , this country 's going to hell in an express hand basket .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's see... Now I can get arrested for both shouting "Fire!
" in a crowded theater and for not shouting "Fire!
" in a crowded theater.
Man, this country's going to hell in an express hand basket.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217516</id>
	<title>It's a tough call....</title>
	<author>ikefox</author>
	<datestamp>1259095080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>As much as I hate that Youtuber douchebag Justin Bieber, I think the cops were probably pretty stupid for arresting him, especially considering what appear to be the facts. However, I'd be pretty pissed off if I was a cop and I had to disperse a mob of whiny, caffeinated teenage girls congregating over *that* guy too, so I can empathize. I still anticipate a false arrest case.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As much as I hate that Youtuber douchebag Justin Bieber , I think the cops were probably pretty stupid for arresting him , especially considering what appear to be the facts .
However , I 'd be pretty pissed off if I was a cop and I had to disperse a mob of whiny , caffeinated teenage girls congregating over * that * guy too , so I can empathize .
I still anticipate a false arrest case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As much as I hate that Youtuber douchebag Justin Bieber, I think the cops were probably pretty stupid for arresting him, especially considering what appear to be the facts.
However, I'd be pretty pissed off if I was a cop and I had to disperse a mob of whiny, caffeinated teenage girls congregating over *that* guy too, so I can empathize.
I still anticipate a false arrest case.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217360</id>
	<title>Re:How would that work</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259094420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The guy continued to send out tweets that he was signing autographs after the giant crowd dispersed.  He was being an asshole and a danger to public safety to satisfy his Internet ego.  Does that make what the cops did right? I dunno.  But it does make him a douche.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The guy continued to send out tweets that he was signing autographs after the giant crowd dispersed .
He was being an asshole and a danger to public safety to satisfy his Internet ego .
Does that make what the cops did right ?
I dunno .
But it does make him a douche .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The guy continued to send out tweets that he was signing autographs after the giant crowd dispersed.
He was being an asshole and a danger to public safety to satisfy his Internet ego.
Does that make what the cops did right?
I dunno.
But it does make him a douche.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217656</id>
	<title>I'm surprised I'm the first to ask....</title>
	<author>Jager Dave</author>
	<datestamp>1259095740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>....but WHO the frak is Justin Bieber, and do we care if he gets trampled?

Granted, being arrested for not "tweeting" is a wrong on so many levels it's not even funny (I don't have a twitter account, don't plan on getting one any time soon), but still....</htmltext>
<tokenext>....but WHO the frak is Justin Bieber , and do we care if he gets trampled ?
Granted , being arrested for not " tweeting " is a wrong on so many levels it 's not even funny ( I do n't have a twitter account , do n't plan on getting one any time soon ) , but still... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....but WHO the frak is Justin Bieber, and do we care if he gets trampled?
Granted, being arrested for not "tweeting" is a wrong on so many levels it's not even funny (I don't have a twitter account, don't plan on getting one any time soon), but still....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218050</id>
	<title>Bozo Arrest!</title>
	<author>b4upoo</author>
	<datestamp>1259054340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>            This fellow will not be convicted and the cops will be sued. The law tells people what they can not do. With rare exceptions it does not compel people to act. For example if a person is under a doctor's care then the doctor may be taken to task. But a random person has no obligation at all to help a drowning man or even to let others know that there is a man drowning. Unless this fellow owned the space in which this problem occurred he has no relationship to the issue at all. Cops often are sadly under educated and this is a prime example of cops crossing the line. Crowd control is the cops' responsibility and not a public speakers. Cops have numerous ways of controlling crowds. If they were too lazy or too stupid then they need to be fired.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This fellow will not be convicted and the cops will be sued .
The law tells people what they can not do .
With rare exceptions it does not compel people to act .
For example if a person is under a doctor 's care then the doctor may be taken to task .
But a random person has no obligation at all to help a drowning man or even to let others know that there is a man drowning .
Unless this fellow owned the space in which this problem occurred he has no relationship to the issue at all .
Cops often are sadly under educated and this is a prime example of cops crossing the line .
Crowd control is the cops ' responsibility and not a public speakers .
Cops have numerous ways of controlling crowds .
If they were too lazy or too stupid then they need to be fired .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>            This fellow will not be convicted and the cops will be sued.
The law tells people what they can not do.
With rare exceptions it does not compel people to act.
For example if a person is under a doctor's care then the doctor may be taken to task.
But a random person has no obligation at all to help a drowning man or even to let others know that there is a man drowning.
Unless this fellow owned the space in which this problem occurred he has no relationship to the issue at all.
Cops often are sadly under educated and this is a prime example of cops crossing the line.
Crowd control is the cops' responsibility and not a public speakers.
Cops have numerous ways of controlling crowds.
If they were too lazy or too stupid then they need to be fired.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218556</id>
	<title>Re:Bozo Arrest!</title>
	<author>yorktown</author>
	<datestamp>1259056740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>With rare exceptions it does not compel people to act. For example if a person is under a doctor's care then the doctor may be taken to task. But a random person has no obligation at all to help a drowning man or even to let others know that there is a man drowning.</p></div><p>In 1999, California passed a law that makes it illegal not to report a witness crime if the victim is 14 and under.  This law got attention recently when a bunch of people stood by when a high school girl was <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/10/27/california.gang.rape.investigation/index.html" title="cnn.com" rel="nofollow">gang raped</a> [cnn.com] in Richmond, California.  Because she was over 14, the onlookers could not be charged.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>With rare exceptions it does not compel people to act .
For example if a person is under a doctor 's care then the doctor may be taken to task .
But a random person has no obligation at all to help a drowning man or even to let others know that there is a man drowning.In 1999 , California passed a law that makes it illegal not to report a witness crime if the victim is 14 and under .
This law got attention recently when a bunch of people stood by when a high school girl was gang raped [ cnn.com ] in Richmond , California .
Because she was over 14 , the onlookers could not be charged .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With rare exceptions it does not compel people to act.
For example if a person is under a doctor's care then the doctor may be taken to task.
But a random person has no obligation at all to help a drowning man or even to let others know that there is a man drowning.In 1999, California passed a law that makes it illegal not to report a witness crime if the victim is 14 and under.
This law got attention recently when a bunch of people stood by when a high school girl was gang raped [cnn.com] in Richmond, California.
Because she was over 14, the onlookers could not be charged.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30223330</id>
	<title>Re:Decisions, decisions...</title>
	<author>FiloEleven</author>
	<datestamp>1259091720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The government should get down on its knees and Thank the People for allowing it to exist, rather than abolishing it completely.</p></div><p>In theory.  But that requires that the people assert their authority, which ain't happening so often these days.  And I don't mean with guns either, not unless or until they're needed.  Four boxes and all that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The government should get down on its knees and Thank the People for allowing it to exist , rather than abolishing it completely.In theory .
But that requires that the people assert their authority , which ai n't happening so often these days .
And I do n't mean with guns either , not unless or until they 're needed .
Four boxes and all that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The government should get down on its knees and Thank the People for allowing it to exist, rather than abolishing it completely.In theory.
But that requires that the people assert their authority, which ain't happening so often these days.
And I don't mean with guns either, not unless or until they're needed.
Four boxes and all that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217490</id>
	<title>YEAH!!!</title>
	<author>fataugie</author>
	<datestamp>1259095020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Arrest him!  He's the problem!</p><p>Oh, Hello End Times....I <i>thought</i> you were here.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Arrest him !
He 's the problem ! Oh , Hello End Times....I thought you were here.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Arrest him!
He's the problem!Oh, Hello End Times....I thought you were here.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217436</id>
	<title>They got it backwards</title>
	<author>ShiningSomething</author>
	<datestamp>1259094840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some people should be arrested for what they decide to tweet about.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some people should be arrested for what they decide to tweet about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some people should be arrested for what they decide to tweet about.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217580</id>
	<title>Re:old ways are still the best.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259095380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tear gas, dogs and fire hoses have a good track record too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tear gas , dogs and fire hoses have a good track record too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tear gas, dogs and fire hoses have a good track record too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218212</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>thickdiick</author>
	<datestamp>1259055180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is unreasonable to compel someone to publish something in which they do not believe using their own name.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is unreasonable to compel someone to publish something in which they do not believe using their own name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is unreasonable to compel someone to publish something in which they do not believe using their own name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218322</id>
	<title>Your Tweet Is Part Of The</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259055720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17pUBYESQBk&amp;feature=SeriesPlayList&amp;p=C642EFB7DF7281CE" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">New World Order</a> [youtube.com].</p><p>Yours In Baikonur,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>New World Order [ youtube.com ] .Yours In Baikonur,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>New World Order [youtube.com].Yours In Baikonur,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217284</id>
	<title>Decisions, decisions...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259094060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do I side with the Fascist cops or the Nazi record exec?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do I side with the Fascist cops or the Nazi record exec ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do I side with the Fascist cops or the Nazi record exec?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217238</id>
	<title>How would that work</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259093880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>How would they had read the tweet? Or are everyone actually having twitter "on" all the time in mobile phone?<br>
<br>
This is almost like a new pizza place would open in the town square and people would be lining to try it out. As a special opening gift, one random guy would be chosen to decide what toppings go to the largest pizza ever done. Of course everyone would want to chose their favourite ones, crowd would go wild and police would have to be called in and arrest everyone. So now theres tons of pizzas done but everyone is jail. what does the owner do? He enjoys the worlds largest pizza himself.<br>
<br>
I hope the world doesn't turn in to even more "you're always online" place. I usually even leave my phone home when I'm going spending good time somewhere. I don't need to be reachable all the time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How would they had read the tweet ?
Or are everyone actually having twitter " on " all the time in mobile phone ?
This is almost like a new pizza place would open in the town square and people would be lining to try it out .
As a special opening gift , one random guy would be chosen to decide what toppings go to the largest pizza ever done .
Of course everyone would want to chose their favourite ones , crowd would go wild and police would have to be called in and arrest everyone .
So now theres tons of pizzas done but everyone is jail .
what does the owner do ?
He enjoys the worlds largest pizza himself .
I hope the world does n't turn in to even more " you 're always online " place .
I usually even leave my phone home when I 'm going spending good time somewhere .
I do n't need to be reachable all the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How would they had read the tweet?
Or are everyone actually having twitter "on" all the time in mobile phone?
This is almost like a new pizza place would open in the town square and people would be lining to try it out.
As a special opening gift, one random guy would be chosen to decide what toppings go to the largest pizza ever done.
Of course everyone would want to chose their favourite ones, crowd would go wild and police would have to be called in and arrest everyone.
So now theres tons of pizzas done but everyone is jail.
what does the owner do?
He enjoys the worlds largest pizza himself.
I hope the world doesn't turn in to even more "you're always online" place.
I usually even leave my phone home when I'm going spending good time somewhere.
I don't need to be reachable all the time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221624</id>
	<title>MLK? Boston tea party?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259073000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> juts curious about precedent</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>juts curious about precedent</tokentext>
<sentencetext> juts curious about precedent</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217814</id>
	<title>Re:Now this is just Stupidity at its finest</title>
	<author>CannonballHead</author>
	<datestamp>1259053200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The same way tweeting incited a crowd to that level of craziness in the first place?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The same way tweeting incited a crowd to that level of craziness in the first place ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The same way tweeting incited a crowd to that level of craziness in the first place?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30226136</id>
	<title>what BS</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1257178500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope the judge throws the book at those cops. Seriously, you can't force someone to do something...<br>it's called free speech (or lack of). So if someone has chosen to remain silent, then that is their right.</p><p>The cops in this case had lost control of the crowd (their fault) first of all for letting the situation get out of hand, and then to rely on someone else to regain that control is even more pathetic on their part. Then to top it all off, showing their full incompetence, they arrest the guy for not wanting to do their job for them....because they had no control over him either, they decided "we'll show him who is boos" and slapped the cuffs on him.</p><p>My god....we have noobs for cops now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope the judge throws the book at those cops .
Seriously , you ca n't force someone to do something...it 's called free speech ( or lack of ) .
So if someone has chosen to remain silent , then that is their right.The cops in this case had lost control of the crowd ( their fault ) first of all for letting the situation get out of hand , and then to rely on someone else to regain that control is even more pathetic on their part .
Then to top it all off , showing their full incompetence , they arrest the guy for not wanting to do their job for them....because they had no control over him either , they decided " we 'll show him who is boos " and slapped the cuffs on him.My god....we have noobs for cops now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope the judge throws the book at those cops.
Seriously, you can't force someone to do something...it's called free speech (or lack of).
So if someone has chosen to remain silent, then that is their right.The cops in this case had lost control of the crowd (their fault) first of all for letting the situation get out of hand, and then to rely on someone else to regain that control is even more pathetic on their part.
Then to top it all off, showing their full incompetence, they arrest the guy for not wanting to do their job for them....because they had no control over him either, they decided "we'll show him who is boos" and slapped the cuffs on him.My god....we have noobs for cops now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219286</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259059920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"Have you watched the video? Did you see how PACKED it was? "</i></p><p>Yeah, I watched the video. Those teenage girls looked awfully dangerous<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... yeap<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... real public danger there.  Careful, you might get trampled by a pair of high heels or have lipstick smeared on  you are mistaken for Justin Bieber.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/saracasm off/  So as someone else asked - where was the bullhorn?</p><p>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Have you watched the video ?
Did you see how PACKED it was ?
" Yeah , I watched the video .
Those teenage girls looked awfully dangerous ... yeap ... real public danger there .
Careful , you might get trampled by a pair of high heels or have lipstick smeared on you are mistaken for Justin Bieber .
/saracasm off/ So as someone else asked - where was the bullhorn ? .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Have you watched the video?
Did you see how PACKED it was?
"Yeah, I watched the video.
Those teenage girls looked awfully dangerous ... yeap ... real public danger there.
Careful, you might get trampled by a pair of high heels or have lipstick smeared on  you are mistaken for Justin Bieber.
/saracasm off/  So as someone else asked - where was the bullhorn?.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219188</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259059500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This just in:</p><p>Tin</p><p>Foil</p><p>Hat</p><p>Idiot gets a 5 insightful on Slashdot<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... again</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This just in : TinFoilHatIdiot gets a 5 insightful on Slashdot ... again</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This just in:TinFoilHatIdiot gets a 5 insightful on Slashdot ... again</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218082</id>
	<title>Re:Ahh Slashdot</title>
	<author>greg\_barton</author>
	<datestamp>1259054460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes you are.</p><p>Get off my lawn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes you are.Get off my lawn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes you are.Get off my lawn.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219552</id>
	<title>stop!</title>
	<author>frank\_carmody</author>
	<datestamp>1259061180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anything you tweet can, and will, be used against you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anything you tweet can , and will , be used against you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anything you tweet can, and will, be used against you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217328</id>
	<title>old ways are still the best.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259094240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Was their bullhorn broken?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was their bullhorn broken ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was their bullhorn broken?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30220092</id>
	<title>Slashdot titles = trolling, news at 11.</title>
	<author>aaandre</author>
	<datestamp>1259063640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The title says it all, feels like<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. editors are boldly crossing into Troll-landia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The title says it all , feels like / .
editors are boldly crossing into Troll-landia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The title says it all, feels like /.
editors are boldly crossing into Troll-landia.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217396</id>
	<title>Prediction: settlement in court for $$, blue omert</title>
	<author>rsborg</author>
	<datestamp>1259094600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This guy just got the go-ahead to file a wrongful arrest suit possibly netting some nice $$ and/or a formal apology.
<p>
Sad that the community will have to pay restitution (to the improperly arrested) for this kind of police incompetence, while the cops close ranks and continue the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue\_Code\_of\_Silence" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">code of blue silence</a> [wikipedia.org]... and "authorities" wonder why their reputation is in shambles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This guy just got the go-ahead to file a wrongful arrest suit possibly netting some nice $ $ and/or a formal apology .
Sad that the community will have to pay restitution ( to the improperly arrested ) for this kind of police incompetence , while the cops close ranks and continue the code of blue silence [ wikipedia.org ] ... and " authorities " wonder why their reputation is in shambles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This guy just got the go-ahead to file a wrongful arrest suit possibly netting some nice $$ and/or a formal apology.
Sad that the community will have to pay restitution (to the improperly arrested) for this kind of police incompetence, while the cops close ranks and continue the code of blue silence [wikipedia.org]... and "authorities" wonder why their reputation is in shambles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30223816</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like an open-and-shut false-arrest case.</title>
	<author>rrvau</author>
	<datestamp>1257155400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Jeez, why couldn't "The Filth" send a tweet in his name?  Wouldn't think it would be too hard. Coppers just have to beat his access data out of him, what?
RRV - Retired Crim</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jeez , why could n't " The Filth " send a tweet in his name ?
Would n't think it would be too hard .
Coppers just have to beat his access data out of him , what ?
RRV - Retired Crim</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jeez, why couldn't "The Filth" send a tweet in his name?
Wouldn't think it would be too hard.
Coppers just have to beat his access data out of him, what?
RRV - Retired Crim</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221990</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>celtic\_hackr</author>
	<datestamp>1259075880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, when did they repeal the Constitutional right to peaceable assembly? Because, apparently, you seem to think that right no longer exists. <br>
<br>Now the guy might be guilty of reckless endangerment. But the crowd looked pretty peaceful to me. Certainly more peaceful than the crowd we'll see all across America on Friday. Now if what this guy did is illegal then what every major store across America has planned is certainly far worse, and we should go and arrest all of the executives of WalMart on down to Best Buy, right now (for the actions they've done in the past that is)!<br> <br> While I agree what he did, was bad, I don't see how he can be arrested for not doing their job for him. Nor do I see any reason why anyone should be forced to pay for having police or security as a gathering. Or why anyone should be forced to buy insurance in order to exercise the right of peaceful assembly.  If something bad happens and it can be shown the organizers were negligent, then by all mean sue them or jail them if it results in harm to people.<br> <br> Insurance companies have got a racket going now, in my opinion an extortion racket, backed up by laws. I can't believe, I'm defending a record exec, even if what he did was reckless. <br> <br>Of course, now reading TFA, it seems he actually did comply with the police. So it should be interesting what happens. Of course, he'll be protected by his company's billions of dollars, so He'll have some fairly decent lawyering behind him.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , when did they repeal the Constitutional right to peaceable assembly ?
Because , apparently , you seem to think that right no longer exists .
Now the guy might be guilty of reckless endangerment .
But the crowd looked pretty peaceful to me .
Certainly more peaceful than the crowd we 'll see all across America on Friday .
Now if what this guy did is illegal then what every major store across America has planned is certainly far worse , and we should go and arrest all of the executives of WalMart on down to Best Buy , right now ( for the actions they 've done in the past that is ) !
While I agree what he did , was bad , I do n't see how he can be arrested for not doing their job for him .
Nor do I see any reason why anyone should be forced to pay for having police or security as a gathering .
Or why anyone should be forced to buy insurance in order to exercise the right of peaceful assembly .
If something bad happens and it can be shown the organizers were negligent , then by all mean sue them or jail them if it results in harm to people .
Insurance companies have got a racket going now , in my opinion an extortion racket , backed up by laws .
I ca n't believe , I 'm defending a record exec , even if what he did was reckless .
Of course , now reading TFA , it seems he actually did comply with the police .
So it should be interesting what happens .
Of course , he 'll be protected by his company 's billions of dollars , so He 'll have some fairly decent lawyering behind him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, when did they repeal the Constitutional right to peaceable assembly?
Because, apparently, you seem to think that right no longer exists.
Now the guy might be guilty of reckless endangerment.
But the crowd looked pretty peaceful to me.
Certainly more peaceful than the crowd we'll see all across America on Friday.
Now if what this guy did is illegal then what every major store across America has planned is certainly far worse, and we should go and arrest all of the executives of WalMart on down to Best Buy, right now (for the actions they've done in the past that is)!
While I agree what he did, was bad, I don't see how he can be arrested for not doing their job for him.
Nor do I see any reason why anyone should be forced to pay for having police or security as a gathering.
Or why anyone should be forced to buy insurance in order to exercise the right of peaceful assembly.
If something bad happens and it can be shown the organizers were negligent, then by all mean sue them or jail them if it results in harm to people.
Insurance companies have got a racket going now, in my opinion an extortion racket, backed up by laws.
I can't believe, I'm defending a record exec, even if what he did was reckless.
Of course, now reading TFA, it seems he actually did comply with the police.
So it should be interesting what happens.
Of course, he'll be protected by his company's billions of dollars, so He'll have some fairly decent lawyering behind him.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30220782</id>
	<title>Re:Alternative headline:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259067000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Cops powerless against teenage girls.</p><p>I think I can see why they needed to arrest someone...</p></div><p>The younger cops (under 25) could have handcuffed the teenage girls and taken them to the paddy wagon for a firm spanking.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-) The teenage girls would have enjoyed themselves and the cops would have restored law and order without any arrests.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cops powerless against teenage girls.I think I can see why they needed to arrest someone...The younger cops ( under 25 ) could have handcuffed the teenage girls and taken them to the paddy wagon for a firm spanking .
; - ) The teenage girls would have enjoyed themselves and the cops would have restored law and order without any arrests .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cops powerless against teenage girls.I think I can see why they needed to arrest someone...The younger cops (under 25) could have handcuffed the teenage girls and taken them to the paddy wagon for a firm spanking.
;-) The teenage girls would have enjoyed themselves and the cops would have restored law and order without any arrests.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217998</id>
	<title>Re:old ways are still the best.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259054160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, but their Taser batteries were all dead from roasting a little old lady with a big mouth at a traffic stop earlier in the day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but their Taser batteries were all dead from roasting a little old lady with a big mouth at a traffic stop earlier in the day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but their Taser batteries were all dead from roasting a little old lady with a big mouth at a traffic stop earlier in the day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217434</id>
	<title>I'm no fan of music execs</title>
	<author>hamburgler007</author>
	<datestamp>1259094780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But I hope he is exonerated, sues the fuck out of the county and wins.  Not that he needs the money, but there needs to be a clear message sent that you can't twist the law any which way you please when you piss the authorities off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But I hope he is exonerated , sues the fuck out of the county and wins .
Not that he needs the money , but there needs to be a clear message sent that you ca n't twist the law any which way you please when you piss the authorities off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I hope he is exonerated, sues the fuck out of the county and wins.
Not that he needs the money, but there needs to be a clear message sent that you can't twist the law any which way you please when you piss the authorities off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217448</id>
	<title>Not about twitter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259094840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems to me that this is more about the label executive not wanting all those people to leave, than anything about twitter.</p><p>It might have been something like this:</p><p>[Police]: Please, if this teen singer of yours shows up, all those girls might go crazy and we may have some serious crowd control problems here.<br>[Executive]: I'm not telling all those people that have come here for my "product" to go away.<br>[Police]: We are serious, please sir, tell them to go or we may have some problemes.<br>[Executive]: You can't tell me what to do!<br>[Police]: It's a crowd control situation, you have to cooperate.<br>[Executive]: Fuck you!<br>[Police]: Well... now you'll sleep in jail...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems to me that this is more about the label executive not wanting all those people to leave , than anything about twitter.It might have been something like this : [ Police ] : Please , if this teen singer of yours shows up , all those girls might go crazy and we may have some serious crowd control problems here .
[ Executive ] : I 'm not telling all those people that have come here for my " product " to go away .
[ Police ] : We are serious , please sir , tell them to go or we may have some problemes .
[ Executive ] : You ca n't tell me what to do !
[ Police ] : It 's a crowd control situation , you have to cooperate .
[ Executive ] : Fuck you !
[ Police ] : Well... now you 'll sleep in jail.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems to me that this is more about the label executive not wanting all those people to leave, than anything about twitter.It might have been something like this:[Police]: Please, if this teen singer of yours shows up, all those girls might go crazy and we may have some serious crowd control problems here.
[Executive]: I'm not telling all those people that have come here for my "product" to go away.
[Police]: We are serious, please sir, tell them to go or we may have some problemes.
[Executive]: You can't tell me what to do!
[Police]: It's a crowd control situation, you have to cooperate.
[Executive]: Fuck you!
[Police]: Well... now you'll sleep in jail...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219848</id>
	<title>Re:It was a near riot of teenage girls!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259062500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Meh... A few, well thrown hand grenades and...</p><p>No more problem!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Meh... A few , well thrown hand grenades and...No more problem !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meh... A few, well thrown hand grenades and...No more problem!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217740</id>
	<title>Re:Crap</title>
	<author>CannonballHead</author>
	<datestamp>1259096100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>But it's a chance to show everyone how truly evil the police are.  Doesn't matter if it's true or not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But it 's a chance to show everyone how truly evil the police are .
Does n't matter if it 's true or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it's a chance to show everyone how truly evil the police are.
Doesn't matter if it's true or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218872</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>tsstahl</author>
	<datestamp>1259058000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sorry, despite freedom of speech and assembly, people don't have the right to set up giant panicky dangerous packed mob.</p> </div><p>Really?  The civil rights movement was for naught?  Restricting free movement starts with teen idol fans and then moves to political rallies in the same place.  I agree this guy committed a moral wrong.  I'm not so sure on the legal front, though.  Let's examine the gray very closely before we scream black or white.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , despite freedom of speech and assembly , people do n't have the right to set up giant panicky dangerous packed mob .
Really ? The civil rights movement was for naught ?
Restricting free movement starts with teen idol fans and then moves to political rallies in the same place .
I agree this guy committed a moral wrong .
I 'm not so sure on the legal front , though .
Let 's examine the gray very closely before we scream black or white .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, despite freedom of speech and assembly, people don't have the right to set up giant panicky dangerous packed mob.
Really?  The civil rights movement was for naught?
Restricting free movement starts with teen idol fans and then moves to political rallies in the same place.
I agree this guy committed a moral wrong.
I'm not so sure on the legal front, though.
Let's examine the gray very closely before we scream black or white.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217718</id>
	<title>Alternative headline:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259095980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cops powerless against teenage girls.</p><p>I think I can see why they needed to arrest someone...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cops powerless against teenage girls.I think I can see why they needed to arrest someone.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cops powerless against teenage girls.I think I can see why they needed to arrest someone...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217424</id>
	<title>Arrogant, thuggish cops</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259094780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The arrogance of these cops is astounding.  Apparently they think that everyone who is not a cop is their slave.  Arresting someone like that just because they failed to say "how high" when the police say "jump" is, in my opinion, simply criminal behavior.</p><p>Someone needs to waylay these cops in a dark alley and beat the shit out of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The arrogance of these cops is astounding .
Apparently they think that everyone who is not a cop is their slave .
Arresting someone like that just because they failed to say " how high " when the police say " jump " is , in my opinion , simply criminal behavior.Someone needs to waylay these cops in a dark alley and beat the shit out of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The arrogance of these cops is astounding.
Apparently they think that everyone who is not a cop is their slave.
Arresting someone like that just because they failed to say "how high" when the police say "jump" is, in my opinion, simply criminal behavior.Someone needs to waylay these cops in a dark alley and beat the shit out of them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219014</id>
	<title>Re:old ways are still the best.</title>
	<author>Pyrion</author>
	<datestamp>1259058660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Why should we listen to the police?</p></div></blockquote><p>By that logic, why listen to anyone conscripted into doing the job of a police officer?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why should we listen to the police ? By that logic , why listen to anyone conscripted into doing the job of a police officer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why should we listen to the police?By that logic, why listen to anyone conscripted into doing the job of a police officer?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218238</id>
	<title>Re:Crap</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1259055360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All of the sources seem to link back to <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2009/11/21/2009-11-21\_island\_def\_jam\_records\_exec\_.html" title="nydailynews.com">this NY Daily News article</a> [nydailynews.com], and specifically, this paragraph:</p><blockquote><div><p>James Roppo, 44, the senior vice president of sales at Island Def Jam Records, sent out Internet messages to over 3,000 fans that Justin Bieber was signing autographs even after police dispersed the crowd, cops said.</p></div></blockquote><p>If somebody can find a link to those tweets, this accusation has some merit.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All of the sources seem to link back to this NY Daily News article [ nydailynews.com ] , and specifically , this paragraph : James Roppo , 44 , the senior vice president of sales at Island Def Jam Records , sent out Internet messages to over 3,000 fans that Justin Bieber was signing autographs even after police dispersed the crowd , cops said.If somebody can find a link to those tweets , this accusation has some merit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of the sources seem to link back to this NY Daily News article [nydailynews.com], and specifically, this paragraph:James Roppo, 44, the senior vice president of sales at Island Def Jam Records, sent out Internet messages to over 3,000 fans that Justin Bieber was signing autographs even after police dispersed the crowd, cops said.If somebody can find a link to those tweets, this accusation has some merit.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217730</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259096040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is one the dumbest ideas I ever seem posted, are you a politician?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is one the dumbest ideas I ever seem posted , are you a politician ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is one the dumbest ideas I ever seem posted, are you a politician?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218738</id>
	<title>Re:It was a near riot of teenage girls!</title>
	<author>GodfatherofSoul</author>
	<datestamp>1259057580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>That or throw a mop in their direction.  I guarantee they'll scatter to the four corners.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That or throw a mop in their direction .
I guarantee they 'll scatter to the four corners .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That or throw a mop in their direction.
I guarantee they'll scatter to the four corners.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217894</id>
	<title>Re:old ways are still the best.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259053620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the Youtube video posted on the link, there was a guy in a suit on the upper level of the mall with a bullhorn, lot of good that did.  Why couldn't they use the mall PA system?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the Youtube video posted on the link , there was a guy in a suit on the upper level of the mall with a bullhorn , lot of good that did .
Why could n't they use the mall PA system ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the Youtube video posted on the link, there was a guy in a suit on the upper level of the mall with a bullhorn, lot of good that did.
Why couldn't they use the mall PA system?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218080</id>
	<title>If you didn't vote libertarian, you ASKED FOR THIS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259054460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As libertarians have continually pointed out we are headed towards a police state.  There is no difference between Republicrat and Democan as they are both pushing us towards that goal; so anyone who voted for either and will continue to vote for either have no room to complain since they are for an intrusive, activist government so they should shut up and go sit on the sidelines.  YOU ASKED FOR IT!</p><p>-Bob</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As libertarians have continually pointed out we are headed towards a police state .
There is no difference between Republicrat and Democan as they are both pushing us towards that goal ; so anyone who voted for either and will continue to vote for either have no room to complain since they are for an intrusive , activist government so they should shut up and go sit on the sidelines .
YOU ASKED FOR IT ! -Bob</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As libertarians have continually pointed out we are headed towards a police state.
There is no difference between Republicrat and Democan as they are both pushing us towards that goal; so anyone who voted for either and will continue to vote for either have no room to complain since they are for an intrusive, activist government so they should shut up and go sit on the sidelines.
YOU ASKED FOR IT!-Bob</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217452</id>
	<title>USCR</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259094840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So now we're living in the United States of Communist Regime.  Of course we have a lack of detailed information here.  There could be more to the story than what this little blurb implies.  But, these are no longer isolated cases.  Stuff like this seems to be happening on a daily basis.  Our rights are being violated at will, all the time.  1st thing I would be doing here is finding a good lawyer, and going after the department and the officers for false arrest.  This kind of abuse has to stop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So now we 're living in the United States of Communist Regime .
Of course we have a lack of detailed information here .
There could be more to the story than what this little blurb implies .
But , these are no longer isolated cases .
Stuff like this seems to be happening on a daily basis .
Our rights are being violated at will , all the time .
1st thing I would be doing here is finding a good lawyer , and going after the department and the officers for false arrest .
This kind of abuse has to stop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So now we're living in the United States of Communist Regime.
Of course we have a lack of detailed information here.
There could be more to the story than what this little blurb implies.
But, these are no longer isolated cases.
Stuff like this seems to be happening on a daily basis.
Our rights are being violated at will, all the time.
1st thing I would be doing here is finding a good lawyer, and going after the department and the officers for false arrest.
This kind of abuse has to stop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218006</id>
	<title>Obligatory!</title>
	<author>jggimi</author>
	<datestamp>1259054160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The timing is absolutely perfect, too:

<a href="http://dilbert.com/fast/2009-11-24/" title="dilbert.com" rel="nofollow">http://dilbert.com/fast/2009-11-24/</a> [dilbert.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The timing is absolutely perfect , too : http : //dilbert.com/fast/2009-11-24/ [ dilbert.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The timing is absolutely perfect, too:

http://dilbert.com/fast/2009-11-24/ [dilbert.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217278</id>
	<title>Cop, arrest thyself!</title>
	<author>Citizen of Earth</author>
	<datestamp>1259094000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like the cops need to arrest themselves.  How do they think the crowd will react to something like this?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like the cops need to arrest themselves .
How do they think the crowd will react to something like this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like the cops need to arrest themselves.
How do they think the crowd will react to something like this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30222440</id>
	<title>Re:old ways are still the best.</title>
	<author>evil\_aar0n</author>
	<datestamp>1259080020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Seriously, I don't think this generation cares about the police.</p><p>When a quick search turns up this:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search\_query=police+brutality&amp;search\_type=&amp;aq=2&amp;oq=police+" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/results?search\_query=police+brutality&amp;search\_type=&amp;aq=2&amp;oq=police+</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>I wonder whether there's reason to respect the police.  This, by the way, is just the tip of the iceberg because it only covers what was put up on YouTube.  What about the stuff that's not captured on camera?  Or the stuff that was done years ago before there was a YouTube?</p><p>Add it all up, and I have to agree with whomever it was that said, "Fuck tha police."  When they start treating us with respect, I'll reconsider.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Seriously , I do n't think this generation cares about the police.When a quick search turns up this : http : //www.youtube.com/results ? search \ _query = police + brutality&amp;search \ _type = &amp;aq = 2&amp;oq = police + [ youtube.com ] I wonder whether there 's reason to respect the police .
This , by the way , is just the tip of the iceberg because it only covers what was put up on YouTube .
What about the stuff that 's not captured on camera ?
Or the stuff that was done years ago before there was a YouTube ? Add it all up , and I have to agree with whomever it was that said , " Fuck tha police .
" When they start treating us with respect , I 'll reconsider .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Seriously, I don't think this generation cares about the police.When a quick search turns up this:http://www.youtube.com/results?search\_query=police+brutality&amp;search\_type=&amp;aq=2&amp;oq=police+ [youtube.com]I wonder whether there's reason to respect the police.
This, by the way, is just the tip of the iceberg because it only covers what was put up on YouTube.
What about the stuff that's not captured on camera?
Or the stuff that was done years ago before there was a YouTube?Add it all up, and I have to agree with whomever it was that said, "Fuck tha police.
"  When they start treating us with respect, I'll reconsider.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217762</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259096160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is exactly what a record exec wants. Massive publicity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is exactly what a record exec wants .
Massive publicity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is exactly what a record exec wants.
Massive publicity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219648</id>
	<title>Really?</title>
	<author>Mashiki</author>
	<datestamp>1259061600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds much closer to a obstruct police case to me.  He refused to help, and hindered police.  In Canada that's the equivalent to a felony.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds much closer to a obstruct police case to me .
He refused to help , and hindered police .
In Canada that 's the equivalent to a felony .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds much closer to a obstruct police case to me.
He refused to help, and hindered police.
In Canada that's the equivalent to a felony.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217628</id>
	<title>Re:Now this is just Stupidity at its finest</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259095620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed.  The crowd was out of hand before the record folks even showed up.  The mall security, and the local authorities failed, and then decided to blame someone else for it.</p><p>The next thing is:  In the article, it appeared that most of the attendees were tween girls...  And there were plenty of references to parents being there too.  One reference even said that a mother, father and daughter "camped out" so they could be near the front.  They also fail.  As adults, be freaking civil, you're supposed to be examples.  I'm willing to bet that a lot of the fighting was between the adults...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
The crowd was out of hand before the record folks even showed up .
The mall security , and the local authorities failed , and then decided to blame someone else for it.The next thing is : In the article , it appeared that most of the attendees were tween girls... And there were plenty of references to parents being there too .
One reference even said that a mother , father and daughter " camped out " so they could be near the front .
They also fail .
As adults , be freaking civil , you 're supposed to be examples .
I 'm willing to bet that a lot of the fighting was between the adults.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
The crowd was out of hand before the record folks even showed up.
The mall security, and the local authorities failed, and then decided to blame someone else for it.The next thing is:  In the article, it appeared that most of the attendees were tween girls...  And there were plenty of references to parents being there too.
One reference even said that a mother, father and daughter "camped out" so they could be near the front.
They also fail.
As adults, be freaking civil, you're supposed to be examples.
I'm willing to bet that a lot of the fighting was between the adults...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221186</id>
	<title>Re:If you didn't vote libertarian, you ASKED FOR T</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259069580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>As libertarians have continually pointed out we are headed towards a police state.</i> </p><p>You would prefer the headline <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iroquois\_Theater\_fire" title="wikipedia.org">600 Die In Iroquois Theater Fire?</a> [wikipedia.org] </p><p>When exits are jammed, when crowd control fails, people die. <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/11/28/black.friday.violence/" title="cnn.com">Wal-Mart worker dies in rush; two killed at toy store</a> [cnn.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As libertarians have continually pointed out we are headed towards a police state .
You would prefer the headline 600 Die In Iroquois Theater Fire ?
[ wikipedia.org ] When exits are jammed , when crowd control fails , people die .
Wal-Mart worker dies in rush ; two killed at toy store [ cnn.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As libertarians have continually pointed out we are headed towards a police state.
You would prefer the headline 600 Die In Iroquois Theater Fire?
[wikipedia.org] When exits are jammed, when crowd control fails, people die.
Wal-Mart worker dies in rush; two killed at toy store [cnn.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218782</id>
	<title>It was worth it.</title>
	<author>burris</author>
	<datestamp>1259057760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Never heard of this Justin guy until this.  Any publicity is good publicity...  I'm sure the exec will get a bonus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never heard of this Justin guy until this .
Any publicity is good publicity... I 'm sure the exec will get a bonus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never heard of this Justin guy until this.
Any publicity is good publicity...  I'm sure the exec will get a bonus.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30222848</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>thePowerOfGrayskull</author>
	<datestamp>1259084280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Especially when you consider that the star of the day declined to show up for autographs - because the crowd was too unruly...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Especially when you consider that the star of the day declined to show up for autographs - because the crowd was too unruly.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Especially when you consider that the star of the day declined to show up for autographs - because the crowd was too unruly...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217534</id>
	<title>It was a near riot of teenage girls!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259095200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Tweeting is the ONLY way to break up a riot of teenage girls!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tweeting is the ONLY way to break up a riot of teenage girls !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tweeting is the ONLY way to break up a riot of teenage girls!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219372</id>
	<title>Re:old ways are still the best.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259060280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the video posted in the link, there's a guy in a suit with a bullhorn telling the crowd that the singer would not be appearing, that's one bullhorn to a crowd of 3000.  Why they didn't just use the mall's PA system I have no idea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the video posted in the link , there 's a guy in a suit with a bullhorn telling the crowd that the singer would not be appearing , that 's one bullhorn to a crowd of 3000 .
Why they did n't just use the mall 's PA system I have no idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the video posted in the link, there's a guy in a suit with a bullhorn telling the crowd that the singer would not be appearing, that's one bullhorn to a crowd of 3000.
Why they didn't just use the mall's PA system I have no idea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218370</id>
	<title>Re:Crap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259055960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's like kdawson and  samzenpus switched accounts!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like kdawson and samzenpus switched accounts !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like kdawson and  samzenpus switched accounts!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217698</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1259095920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, ordering someone to 'tweet' is as every bit as ridiculous as it sounds.</p><p>Was he wearing a canary suit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , ordering someone to 'tweet ' is as every bit as ridiculous as it sounds.Was he wearing a canary suit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, ordering someone to 'tweet' is as every bit as ridiculous as it sounds.Was he wearing a canary suit?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217832</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259053260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I Agree.</p><p>I once helped organize a peaceful public march on public sidewalks that ended in a public park with a community picnic. I had to obtain indemnity forms from all participants for my own protection (in case someone slipped and twisted an ankle), but more imnportantly, also obtain insurance to compensate the city if there was any damage: $250,000 worth, given the size of the crowd. (It was actually cheap, about $200).</p><p>I was also expected to ensure that people acted in an ORDERLY manner, and would have been required to pay for police presence if the crowd was expected to be large.</p><p>The point here was that the event was badly organized and the organizers charged regardless of whether they cooperated with "tweeting" or not. They just made a bad situation worse by not cooperating.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I Agree.I once helped organize a peaceful public march on public sidewalks that ended in a public park with a community picnic .
I had to obtain indemnity forms from all participants for my own protection ( in case someone slipped and twisted an ankle ) , but more imnportantly , also obtain insurance to compensate the city if there was any damage : $ 250,000 worth , given the size of the crowd .
( It was actually cheap , about $ 200 ) .I was also expected to ensure that people acted in an ORDERLY manner , and would have been required to pay for police presence if the crowd was expected to be large.The point here was that the event was badly organized and the organizers charged regardless of whether they cooperated with " tweeting " or not .
They just made a bad situation worse by not cooperating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I Agree.I once helped organize a peaceful public march on public sidewalks that ended in a public park with a community picnic.
I had to obtain indemnity forms from all participants for my own protection (in case someone slipped and twisted an ankle), but more imnportantly, also obtain insurance to compensate the city if there was any damage: $250,000 worth, given the size of the crowd.
(It was actually cheap, about $200).I was also expected to ensure that people acted in an ORDERLY manner, and would have been required to pay for police presence if the crowd was expected to be large.The point here was that the event was badly organized and the organizers charged regardless of whether they cooperated with "tweeting" or not.
They just made a bad situation worse by not cooperating.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218570</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>zullnero</author>
	<datestamp>1259056800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah?  Well, if the Mall decided to host it, do you know for certain if they DIDN'T say that they would supply their own security?
<br> <br>
Yeah, I know it's<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., but please.  Think about it a little more.  This story isn't giving you all the details.  Venues often supply their own security for various events.  Talent agencies supply the talent, but frequently, they don't do things like rent a small army of security people, with the exception of their own security guards for their talent.  They don't lug in 500 chairs and 175 tables and the people needed to set them all up.  It's up to the venue.
<br> <br>
Malls host this stuff because it means lots of teenagers are going to show up with their parents in tow, and that means money gets spent.  The people responsible for this mess are the people who run that mall, unless they explicitly demanded that the talent bring his own small army of rent-a-cops, posts and ropes, and whatever else they'd need to organize these people.  Think about it...malls, rent-a-cops.  They usually have them on hand.  They probably hold other events as well...you get it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah ?
Well , if the Mall decided to host it , do you know for certain if they DID N'T say that they would supply their own security ?
Yeah , I know it 's /. , but please .
Think about it a little more .
This story is n't giving you all the details .
Venues often supply their own security for various events .
Talent agencies supply the talent , but frequently , they do n't do things like rent a small army of security people , with the exception of their own security guards for their talent .
They do n't lug in 500 chairs and 175 tables and the people needed to set them all up .
It 's up to the venue .
Malls host this stuff because it means lots of teenagers are going to show up with their parents in tow , and that means money gets spent .
The people responsible for this mess are the people who run that mall , unless they explicitly demanded that the talent bring his own small army of rent-a-cops , posts and ropes , and whatever else they 'd need to organize these people .
Think about it...malls , rent-a-cops .
They usually have them on hand .
They probably hold other events as well...you get it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah?
Well, if the Mall decided to host it, do you know for certain if they DIDN'T say that they would supply their own security?
Yeah, I know it's /., but please.
Think about it a little more.
This story isn't giving you all the details.
Venues often supply their own security for various events.
Talent agencies supply the talent, but frequently, they don't do things like rent a small army of security people, with the exception of their own security guards for their talent.
They don't lug in 500 chairs and 175 tables and the people needed to set them all up.
It's up to the venue.
Malls host this stuff because it means lots of teenagers are going to show up with their parents in tow, and that means money gets spent.
The people responsible for this mess are the people who run that mall, unless they explicitly demanded that the talent bring his own small army of rent-a-cops, posts and ropes, and whatever else they'd need to organize these people.
Think about it...malls, rent-a-cops.
They usually have them on hand.
They probably hold other events as well...you get it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30222038</id>
	<title>Re:It was a near riot of teenage girls!</title>
	<author>deek</author>
	<datestamp>1259076240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I disagree.  A compilation of geeks would work just as well, or possibly be even more effective.</p><p>Even better, the phrase "Release the geeks!" could be used.  That's just awesomeness in itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I disagree .
A compilation of geeks would work just as well , or possibly be even more effective.Even better , the phrase " Release the geeks !
" could be used .
That 's just awesomeness in itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I disagree.
A compilation of geeks would work just as well, or possibly be even more effective.Even better, the phrase "Release the geeks!
" could be used.
That's just awesomeness in itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221610</id>
	<title>Re:Crap</title>
	<author>JesseMcDonald</author>
	<datestamp>1259072880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This caused fans to go berzerk [sic] and rush forward, breaking down barriers.</p></div><p>This is a severe mischaracterization. Nothing <em>caused</em> these fans to go berserk; they chose to do so themselves. The police are holding one person accountable for the free and willful actions of others, which is a complete miscarriage of justice.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This caused fans to go berzerk [ sic ] and rush forward , breaking down barriers.This is a severe mischaracterization .
Nothing caused these fans to go berserk ; they chose to do so themselves .
The police are holding one person accountable for the free and willful actions of others , which is a complete miscarriage of justice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This caused fans to go berzerk [sic] and rush forward, breaking down barriers.This is a severe mischaracterization.
Nothing caused these fans to go berserk; they chose to do so themselves.
The police are holding one person accountable for the free and willful actions of others, which is a complete miscarriage of justice.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217324</id>
	<title>Now this is just Stupidity at its finest</title>
	<author>ITJC68</author>
	<datestamp>1259094240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>How is a tweet requesting calm going to do anything. Most of the people wouldn't pay any attention. The cops should have just used their loudspeaker and told the attendees to calm it down or be arrested. The arresting officer should have some unpaid time off at least for being so stupid.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How is a tweet requesting calm going to do anything .
Most of the people would n't pay any attention .
The cops should have just used their loudspeaker and told the attendees to calm it down or be arrested .
The arresting officer should have some unpaid time off at least for being so stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is a tweet requesting calm going to do anything.
Most of the people wouldn't pay any attention.
The cops should have just used their loudspeaker and told the attendees to calm it down or be arrested.
The arresting officer should have some unpaid time off at least for being so stupid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218402</id>
	<title>I don't know anyone who 'tweets'. Good.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259056140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have yet to meet anyone who claims to tweet (shut up. I don't care that it's at the core of your life. It doesn't impinge on mine), yet there seems to be a hugely disproportionate number of articles in newspapers and on line, where 'tweeting' is a factor. Either the editors have gone mad, or the people behind tweet are well connected and have weaselled their uninteresting stories into the media somehow.</p><p>The sooner this daft fad fades away the better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have yet to meet anyone who claims to tweet ( shut up .
I do n't care that it 's at the core of your life .
It does n't impinge on mine ) , yet there seems to be a hugely disproportionate number of articles in newspapers and on line , where 'tweeting ' is a factor .
Either the editors have gone mad , or the people behind tweet are well connected and have weaselled their uninteresting stories into the media somehow.The sooner this daft fad fades away the better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have yet to meet anyone who claims to tweet (shut up.
I don't care that it's at the core of your life.
It doesn't impinge on mine), yet there seems to be a hugely disproportionate number of articles in newspapers and on line, where 'tweeting' is a factor.
Either the editors have gone mad, or the people behind tweet are well connected and have weaselled their uninteresting stories into the media somehow.The sooner this daft fad fades away the better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30223620</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257152400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh my god! where were indeed all these safety measures.... fuck off fascist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh my god !
where were indeed all these safety measures.... fuck off fascist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh my god!
where were indeed all these safety measures.... fuck off fascist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221064</id>
	<title>Re:If you didn't vote libertarian, you ASKED FOR T</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259068860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>a lot of people are definitely getting the government they deserve. too bad it sucks for the rest of us who still believe in the constitution</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a lot of people are definitely getting the government they deserve .
too bad it sucks for the rest of us who still believe in the constitution</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a lot of people are definitely getting the government they deserve.
too bad it sucks for the rest of us who still believe in the constitution</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221424</id>
	<title>No</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259071140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Have you watched the video? Did you see how PACKED it was?</p> </div><p>Yes.  It was also <b>remarkably</b> orderly for having that many people together.  Did you see the teenagers all around laughing and checking their phones?  Sure, there was some shoving around, but that happens in ANY crowd.  You've got to move when the herd moves.</p><p>I've been to a Michael Jackson show, back in the Dangerous tour.  THAT was an unruly crowd, and you can bet that it was well organized.  When you have a lot of people together, there are certain unavoidable circumstances.  Doesn't mean that people shouldn't be there.  If you don't want to take the risk, you don't go.  Everyone there should be aware of the risk of being in a large crowd, and if accidents happen, they happen.  The police should have no right to disperse them, prevent the singer from going in, and most DEFINITELY don't have the right to force someone to say something against his will.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you watched the video ?
Did you see how PACKED it was ?
Yes. It was also remarkably orderly for having that many people together .
Did you see the teenagers all around laughing and checking their phones ?
Sure , there was some shoving around , but that happens in ANY crowd .
You 've got to move when the herd moves.I 've been to a Michael Jackson show , back in the Dangerous tour .
THAT was an unruly crowd , and you can bet that it was well organized .
When you have a lot of people together , there are certain unavoidable circumstances .
Does n't mean that people should n't be there .
If you do n't want to take the risk , you do n't go .
Everyone there should be aware of the risk of being in a large crowd , and if accidents happen , they happen .
The police should have no right to disperse them , prevent the singer from going in , and most DEFINITELY do n't have the right to force someone to say something against his will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you watched the video?
Did you see how PACKED it was?
Yes.  It was also remarkably orderly for having that many people together.
Did you see the teenagers all around laughing and checking their phones?
Sure, there was some shoving around, but that happens in ANY crowd.
You've got to move when the herd moves.I've been to a Michael Jackson show, back in the Dangerous tour.
THAT was an unruly crowd, and you can bet that it was well organized.
When you have a lot of people together, there are certain unavoidable circumstances.
Doesn't mean that people shouldn't be there.
If you don't want to take the risk, you don't go.
Everyone there should be aware of the risk of being in a large crowd, and if accidents happen, they happen.
The police should have no right to disperse them, prevent the singer from going in, and most DEFINITELY don't have the right to force someone to say something against his will.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218506</id>
	<title>Crowd with Net-Connected Laptops?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259056500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This doesn't even make sense. Unless they lugged their laptops along and have a Wi-Fi connection, the members of the crowd are probably not sitting at a computer monitoring Twitter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This does n't even make sense .
Unless they lugged their laptops along and have a Wi-Fi connection , the members of the crowd are probably not sitting at a computer monitoring Twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This doesn't even make sense.
Unless they lugged their laptops along and have a Wi-Fi connection, the members of the crowd are probably not sitting at a computer monitoring Twitter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218416</id>
	<title>They did it for his own protection</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259056200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are talking about teenage girls here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are talking about teenage girls here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are talking about teenage girls here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217650</id>
	<title>Wiggum</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1259095740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Can't you people handle your own problems?....Do we have to police the entire town?"<br>Seriously though...isn't the summary a little misleading? The man was not arrest because he 'refused to tweet' anymore than someone arrested for not pulling over was arrested for 'refusing to turn slightly to the right (or left depending on the country)'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Ca n't you people handle your own problems ? ....Do we have to police the entire town ?
" Seriously though...is n't the summary a little misleading ?
The man was not arrest because he 'refused to tweet ' anymore than someone arrested for not pulling over was arrested for 'refusing to turn slightly to the right ( or left depending on the country ) ' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Can't you people handle your own problems?....Do we have to police the entire town?
"Seriously though...isn't the summary a little misleading?
The man was not arrest because he 'refused to tweet' anymore than someone arrested for not pulling over was arrested for 'refusing to turn slightly to the right (or left depending on the country)'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30222146</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259077200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>WRT to the twitting, it's likely the police were asking him to get people to stop showing up, not asking the existing crowd to do anything.</p></div><p>There is a very large difference between asking someone to do something and ordering them to do it. Sadly, the police often fail to see the difference, and also seem to largely have forgotten that the words "please" and "thank you" can have a much better effect than "do it because I'm a cop &amp; I told you to".</p><p>He had no duty to send a Tweet, and will not face any penalty for refusing to do so, at least under an obstruction charge. He will probably get charged with obstruction for sending tweets telling more people to show up, however. And a laundry-list of other charges stemming from his total failure in organizing and controlling the event.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>WRT to the twitting , it 's likely the police were asking him to get people to stop showing up , not asking the existing crowd to do anything.There is a very large difference between asking someone to do something and ordering them to do it .
Sadly , the police often fail to see the difference , and also seem to largely have forgotten that the words " please " and " thank you " can have a much better effect than " do it because I 'm a cop &amp; I told you to " .He had no duty to send a Tweet , and will not face any penalty for refusing to do so , at least under an obstruction charge .
He will probably get charged with obstruction for sending tweets telling more people to show up , however .
And a laundry-list of other charges stemming from his total failure in organizing and controlling the event .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WRT to the twitting, it's likely the police were asking him to get people to stop showing up, not asking the existing crowd to do anything.There is a very large difference between asking someone to do something and ordering them to do it.
Sadly, the police often fail to see the difference, and also seem to largely have forgotten that the words "please" and "thank you" can have a much better effect than "do it because I'm a cop &amp; I told you to".He had no duty to send a Tweet, and will not face any penalty for refusing to do so, at least under an obstruction charge.
He will probably get charged with obstruction for sending tweets telling more people to show up, however.
And a laundry-list of other charges stemming from his total failure in organizing and controlling the event.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217276</id>
	<title>Sounds like an open-and-shut false-arrest case.</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1259094000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>n/t</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>n/t</tokentext>
<sentencetext>n/t</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219818</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259062380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure Public Safety(R) is a registered trademark.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure Public Safety ( R ) is a registered trademark .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure Public Safety(R) is a registered trademark.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30220322</id>
	<title>There's a typo in the title</title>
	<author>tool462</author>
	<datestamp>1259064720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It should read: "Man arrested for being a twat"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It should read : " Man arrested for being a twat "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It should read: "Man arrested for being a twat"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217454</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259094900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ordering him to tweet WAS compeltely reasonable when you see the danger involved that this man caused by a total lack of preparation.</p></div><p>No, ordering someone to 'tweet' is as every bit as ridiculous as it sounds.</p><p>However, maybe they could arrest him for the other stuff?  Why are the police focusing on this twitter thing, it's just making all involved look stupid...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ordering him to tweet WAS compeltely reasonable when you see the danger involved that this man caused by a total lack of preparation.No , ordering someone to 'tweet ' is as every bit as ridiculous as it sounds.However , maybe they could arrest him for the other stuff ?
Why are the police focusing on this twitter thing , it 's just making all involved look stupid.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ordering him to tweet WAS compeltely reasonable when you see the danger involved that this man caused by a total lack of preparation.No, ordering someone to 'tweet' is as every bit as ridiculous as it sounds.However, maybe they could arrest him for the other stuff?
Why are the police focusing on this twitter thing, it's just making all involved look stupid...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217440</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259094840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Ordering him to tweet WAS compeltely reasonable</i></p><p>I agree that ordering him to fix his shit would be completely reasonable, but what the hell is a tweet going to do?  You think all those kids are going to drop everything and look at their twitter account?  You think they'd have even heard their phone beep in that mess, assuming that they even get twitter updates on their phone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ordering him to tweet WAS compeltely reasonableI agree that ordering him to fix his shit would be completely reasonable , but what the hell is a tweet going to do ?
You think all those kids are going to drop everything and look at their twitter account ?
You think they 'd have even heard their phone beep in that mess , assuming that they even get twitter updates on their phone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ordering him to tweet WAS compeltely reasonableI agree that ordering him to fix his shit would be completely reasonable, but what the hell is a tweet going to do?
You think all those kids are going to drop everything and look at their twitter account?
You think they'd have even heard their phone beep in that mess, assuming that they even get twitter updates on their phone?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218152</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>Matheus</author>
	<datestamp>1259054880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why was this modded "Funny"?  I find the fact that this comment is WAY too much of a potential reality FAR from funny.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why was this modded " Funny " ?
I find the fact that this comment is WAY too much of a potential reality FAR from funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why was this modded "Funny"?
I find the fact that this comment is WAY too much of a potential reality FAR from funny.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218268</id>
	<title>Re:Decisions, decisions...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259055540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Godwin's Law much?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Godwin 's Law much ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Godwin's Law much?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218030</id>
	<title>Re:Cop, arrest thyself!</title>
	<author>dmmiller2k</author>
	<datestamp>1259054220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>How do they think the crowd will react to something like this?</p></div></blockquote><p>Did they really expect a mob to respond to a tweet during a riot?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do they think the crowd will react to something like this ? Did they really expect a mob to respond to a tweet during a riot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do they think the crowd will react to something like this?Did they really expect a mob to respond to a tweet during a riot?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217278</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30223302</id>
	<title>Re: It was a near riot of teenage girls!</title>
	<author>MacWiz</author>
	<datestamp>1259091180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Tweeting is the ONLY way to break up a riot of teenage girls!</i></p><p>The first idea was to tazer 50 or 60 of them. The second idea was to tazer this Justin kid. Both of those ideas would have set off a 3,000-strong sonic blast of teen screams, forcing them to reconsider.</p><p>They arrested the "record executive" for being "in charge," but not in control. They should have arrested him just for being a record executive pushing 12-year-olds.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/For those unable to tell, that was sarcasm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tweeting is the ONLY way to break up a riot of teenage girls ! The first idea was to tazer 50 or 60 of them .
The second idea was to tazer this Justin kid .
Both of those ideas would have set off a 3,000-strong sonic blast of teen screams , forcing them to reconsider.They arrested the " record executive " for being " in charge , " but not in control .
They should have arrested him just for being a record executive pushing 12-year-olds .
/For those unable to tell , that was sarcasm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tweeting is the ONLY way to break up a riot of teenage girls!The first idea was to tazer 50 or 60 of them.
The second idea was to tazer this Justin kid.
Both of those ideas would have set off a 3,000-strong sonic blast of teen screams, forcing them to reconsider.They arrested the "record executive" for being "in charge," but not in control.
They should have arrested him just for being a record executive pushing 12-year-olds.
/For those unable to tell, that was sarcasm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218668</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>orangeyouglad</author>
	<datestamp>1259057220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do you really think Twitter would have helped much at all? Did you see how unruly the fans were? How about how adamant they were about seeing their idol? I don't imagine a teenager would just walk away if told to do so by anyone in a position of authority.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you really think Twitter would have helped much at all ?
Did you see how unruly the fans were ?
How about how adamant they were about seeing their idol ?
I do n't imagine a teenager would just walk away if told to do so by anyone in a position of authority .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you really think Twitter would have helped much at all?
Did you see how unruly the fans were?
How about how adamant they were about seeing their idol?
I don't imagine a teenager would just walk away if told to do so by anyone in a position of authority.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217760</id>
	<title>Riiight</title>
	<author>bondjamesbond</author>
	<datestamp>1259096160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is just a spun story courtesy of twitter's marketing dept.  I call BS.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is just a spun story courtesy of twitter 's marketing dept .
I call BS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is just a spun story courtesy of twitter's marketing dept.
I call BS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218790</id>
	<title>Large crowd gets dangerous,</title>
	<author>Josh04</author>
	<datestamp>1259057760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Police tell organiser to ask anyone else thinking of coming not to, organiser refuses, gets arrested for making a dangerous situation worse. Seems kinda reasonable once you get past the ridiculously OTT OP.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Police tell organiser to ask anyone else thinking of coming not to , organiser refuses , gets arrested for making a dangerous situation worse .
Seems kinda reasonable once you get past the ridiculously OTT OP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Police tell organiser to ask anyone else thinking of coming not to, organiser refuses, gets arrested for making a dangerous situation worse.
Seems kinda reasonable once you get past the ridiculously OTT OP.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30220040</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>Spykk</author>
	<datestamp>1259063460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This record exec, if he arranged this, screwed up in a HUGE way.</p></div><p>
If you say so... It sounds like the event was popular enough to draw a huge crowd, and now it is getting all sorts of coverage in the media due to this arrest. Mission accomplished?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This record exec , if he arranged this , screwed up in a HUGE way .
If you say so... It sounds like the event was popular enough to draw a huge crowd , and now it is getting all sorts of coverage in the media due to this arrest .
Mission accomplished ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This record exec, if he arranged this, screwed up in a HUGE way.
If you say so... It sounds like the event was popular enough to draw a huge crowd, and now it is getting all sorts of coverage in the media due to this arrest.
Mission accomplished?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30220634</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>StrategicIrony</author>
	<datestamp>1259066160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>However, the simple act of saying "George will be at the mall at 2pm" does not constitute a march, or a parade and it's hard to imagine that this would require a permit.</p><p>Do you think it should?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>However , the simple act of saying " George will be at the mall at 2pm " does not constitute a march , or a parade and it 's hard to imagine that this would require a permit.Do you think it should ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However, the simple act of saying "George will be at the mall at 2pm" does not constitute a march, or a parade and it's hard to imagine that this would require a permit.Do you think it should?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30225142</id>
	<title>Re:</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1257172200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><strong>(the 1st amendment doesn't protect your right to say things that endanger the public, so I don't see why they shouldn't be able to force you to tell a dangerous crowd to disperse).</strong></htmltext>
<tokenext>( the 1st amendment does n't protect your right to say things that endanger the public , so I do n't see why they should n't be able to force you to tell a dangerous crowd to disperse ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(the 1st amendment doesn't protect your right to say things that endanger the public, so I don't see why they shouldn't be able to force you to tell a dangerous crowd to disperse).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219268</id>
	<title>Freedom tags</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259059860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>!freedom<br>!responsibleforself<br>apparentlyresponsibleforothers<br>next!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>! freedom ! responsibleforselfapparentlyresponsibleforothersnext !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>!freedom!responsibleforselfapparentlyresponsibleforothersnext!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217714</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>nomadic</author>
	<datestamp>1259095980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>but what the hell is a tweet going to do? </i>
<br>
<br>
Might keep him from getting arrested for one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>but what the hell is a tweet going to do ?
Might keep him from getting arrested for one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but what the hell is a tweet going to do?
Might keep him from getting arrested for one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217692</id>
	<title>Lousy source</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1259095920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The source in TFA is a news/opinion article about <a href="http://www.newsday.com/long-island/nassau/aggressive-roosevelt-field-crowd-cancels-bieber-visit-1.1613741" title="newsday.com">this Newsday article</a> [newsday.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The source in TFA is a news/opinion article about this Newsday article [ newsday.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The source in TFA is a news/opinion article about this Newsday article [newsday.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217420</id>
	<title>Riotous rumor</title>
	<author>Silentknyght</author>
	<datestamp>1259094780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, you already have an unruly crowd waiting for the arrival of someone special, and you want to effectively disseminate a rumor* that said special person isn't arriving? And <i>that's</i> supposed to calm the crowd down and get them to leave peacefully?  Must be some new-age thinking, there...</p><p>

*As previous poster(s) have mentioned, a message via twitter is only going to be received by a select few people who have access to twitter in that situation, and therefore, its only going to spread to everyone via word of mouth.  In other words, a rumor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , you already have an unruly crowd waiting for the arrival of someone special , and you want to effectively disseminate a rumor * that said special person is n't arriving ?
And that 's supposed to calm the crowd down and get them to leave peacefully ?
Must be some new-age thinking , there.. . * As previous poster ( s ) have mentioned , a message via twitter is only going to be received by a select few people who have access to twitter in that situation , and therefore , its only going to spread to everyone via word of mouth .
In other words , a rumor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, you already have an unruly crowd waiting for the arrival of someone special, and you want to effectively disseminate a rumor* that said special person isn't arriving?
And that's supposed to calm the crowd down and get them to leave peacefully?
Must be some new-age thinking, there...

*As previous poster(s) have mentioned, a message via twitter is only going to be received by a select few people who have access to twitter in that situation, and therefore, its only going to spread to everyone via word of mouth.
In other words, a rumor.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217364</id>
	<title>Good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259094480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Damn non-tweeters. Lock them all up and throw away the key, I say.</p><p>If we allow non-tweeters, what's next? Non-myspacers? Non-facebookers? It's utter madness!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn non-tweeters .
Lock them all up and throw away the key , I say.If we allow non-tweeters , what 's next ?
Non-myspacers ? Non-facebookers ?
It 's utter madness !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn non-tweeters.
Lock them all up and throw away the key, I say.If we allow non-tweeters, what's next?
Non-myspacers? Non-facebookers?
It's utter madness!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218980</id>
	<title>Re:Alternative headline:</title>
	<author>D Ninja</author>
	<datestamp>1259058480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Cops powerless against teenage girls.</p></div><p>Apparently you didn't have a sister.  Teenage girls are scary...especially when it comes to their idols.</p><p>(Still get the shakes when I hear N'Sync...)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cops powerless against teenage girls.Apparently you did n't have a sister .
Teenage girls are scary...especially when it comes to their idols .
( Still get the shakes when I hear N'Sync... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cops powerless against teenage girls.Apparently you didn't have a sister.
Teenage girls are scary...especially when it comes to their idols.
(Still get the shakes when I hear N'Sync...)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218582</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259056860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know that it is cool to attack personal responsibility around here and engage in groupthink. However, personal responsibility dictates that no one can ever be held responsible for the actions of others. I guess that you only want a scapegoat instead of accurately assigning blame to those who actually endangered the public.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know that it is cool to attack personal responsibility around here and engage in groupthink .
However , personal responsibility dictates that no one can ever be held responsible for the actions of others .
I guess that you only want a scapegoat instead of accurately assigning blame to those who actually endangered the public .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know that it is cool to attack personal responsibility around here and engage in groupthink.
However, personal responsibility dictates that no one can ever be held responsible for the actions of others.
I guess that you only want a scapegoat instead of accurately assigning blame to those who actually endangered the public.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344</id>
	<title>Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259094360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>All piling on, screaming, yelling, rabid comments, without knowing why or how.
<br> <br>
Have you watched the video?  Did you see how PACKED it was?
<br> <br>
Where were the orderly lines, set up with ropes, enforced with security?  Where were any possible safety measures?
<br> <br>
This record exec, if he arranged this, screwed up in a HUGE way.  It was pretty clear that NO one was organizing or making this event orderly.  I'm surprised people weren't getting pushed over the waist high walls into the second level, or falling and getting crushed under foot.
<br> <br>
I'm sorry, but there is a whole lot of circumstances here beside what the oh-so-informative title says.  The record label and the mall need to be held responsible for that total cluster fuck.  Ordering him to tweet WAS compeltely reasonable when you see the danger involved that this man caused by a total lack of preparation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All piling on , screaming , yelling , rabid comments , without knowing why or how .
Have you watched the video ?
Did you see how PACKED it was ?
Where were the orderly lines , set up with ropes , enforced with security ?
Where were any possible safety measures ?
This record exec , if he arranged this , screwed up in a HUGE way .
It was pretty clear that NO one was organizing or making this event orderly .
I 'm surprised people were n't getting pushed over the waist high walls into the second level , or falling and getting crushed under foot .
I 'm sorry , but there is a whole lot of circumstances here beside what the oh-so-informative title says .
The record label and the mall need to be held responsible for that total cluster fuck .
Ordering him to tweet WAS compeltely reasonable when you see the danger involved that this man caused by a total lack of preparation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All piling on, screaming, yelling, rabid comments, without knowing why or how.
Have you watched the video?
Did you see how PACKED it was?
Where were the orderly lines, set up with ropes, enforced with security?
Where were any possible safety measures?
This record exec, if he arranged this, screwed up in a HUGE way.
It was pretty clear that NO one was organizing or making this event orderly.
I'm surprised people weren't getting pushed over the waist high walls into the second level, or falling and getting crushed under foot.
I'm sorry, but there is a whole lot of circumstances here beside what the oh-so-informative title says.
The record label and the mall need to be held responsible for that total cluster fuck.
Ordering him to tweet WAS compeltely reasonable when you see the danger involved that this man caused by a total lack of preparation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217686</id>
	<title>seems pretty reasonable to me</title>
	<author>SuperBanana</author>
	<datestamp>1259095860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stores, for example, are expected to at least talk to the local PD about traffic/crowd concerns, and engage in some common crowd control 'best practices', call the police if things look like they're getting out of control, etc.  And sometimes, yeah, the cops say Pool's Closed if they think people are going to get hurt.

<p>If the event was promoted on twitter, you're damn right it is reasonable to expect that it MIGHT be an effective communication tool.  At the very least, it'll maybe stop MORE people from showing up.  And if the cops said "look, there's this crazy crowd, it's going to get ugly, please help" and the guy won't- well, sorry, that's just being an asshat, and if people do get injured, I don't think an arrest and charge is out of the question.  Then the DA has to decide it's worth prosecuting and the court has to decide if it's legit enough to go to trial.  And then he gets a trial by jury if he wants it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stores , for example , are expected to at least talk to the local PD about traffic/crowd concerns , and engage in some common crowd control 'best practices ' , call the police if things look like they 're getting out of control , etc .
And sometimes , yeah , the cops say Pool 's Closed if they think people are going to get hurt .
If the event was promoted on twitter , you 're damn right it is reasonable to expect that it MIGHT be an effective communication tool .
At the very least , it 'll maybe stop MORE people from showing up .
And if the cops said " look , there 's this crazy crowd , it 's going to get ugly , please help " and the guy wo n't- well , sorry , that 's just being an asshat , and if people do get injured , I do n't think an arrest and charge is out of the question .
Then the DA has to decide it 's worth prosecuting and the court has to decide if it 's legit enough to go to trial .
And then he gets a trial by jury if he wants it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stores, for example, are expected to at least talk to the local PD about traffic/crowd concerns, and engage in some common crowd control 'best practices', call the police if things look like they're getting out of control, etc.
And sometimes, yeah, the cops say Pool's Closed if they think people are going to get hurt.
If the event was promoted on twitter, you're damn right it is reasonable to expect that it MIGHT be an effective communication tool.
At the very least, it'll maybe stop MORE people from showing up.
And if the cops said "look, there's this crazy crowd, it's going to get ugly, please help" and the guy won't- well, sorry, that's just being an asshat, and if people do get injured, I don't think an arrest and charge is out of the question.
Then the DA has to decide it's worth prosecuting and the court has to decide if it's legit enough to go to trial.
And then he gets a trial by jury if he wants it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>DavidTC</author>
	<datestamp>1259095380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'The police' aren't focused on it. The media are.</p><p>
This guy got arrested because he set up an event he knew would draw huge crowds, it did, he was in charge of the crowd, and he has no safety measures and wouldn't tell them to disperse. (Via any means.)</p><p>
Sorry, despite freedom of speech and assembly, people don't have the right to set up giant panicky dangerous packed mob. You want to address a huge crowd, you put it somewhere a huge crowd can fit, with actual crowd control measures.</p><p>
WRT to the twitting, it's likely the police were asking him to get people to <b>stop showing up</b>, not asking the existing crowd to do anything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'The police ' are n't focused on it .
The media are .
This guy got arrested because he set up an event he knew would draw huge crowds , it did , he was in charge of the crowd , and he has no safety measures and would n't tell them to disperse .
( Via any means .
) Sorry , despite freedom of speech and assembly , people do n't have the right to set up giant panicky dangerous packed mob .
You want to address a huge crowd , you put it somewhere a huge crowd can fit , with actual crowd control measures .
WRT to the twitting , it 's likely the police were asking him to get people to stop showing up , not asking the existing crowd to do anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'The police' aren't focused on it.
The media are.
This guy got arrested because he set up an event he knew would draw huge crowds, it did, he was in charge of the crowd, and he has no safety measures and wouldn't tell them to disperse.
(Via any means.
)
Sorry, despite freedom of speech and assembly, people don't have the right to set up giant panicky dangerous packed mob.
You want to address a huge crowd, you put it somewhere a huge crowd can fit, with actual crowd control measures.
WRT to the twitting, it's likely the police were asking him to get people to stop showing up, not asking the existing crowd to do anything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217462</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>ShiningSomething</author>
	<datestamp>1259094900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How would have Twitter helped? He may deserve to be arrested, but his refusal to tweet is not the reason why.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How would have Twitter helped ?
He may deserve to be arrested , but his refusal to tweet is not the reason why .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How would have Twitter helped?
He may deserve to be arrested, but his refusal to tweet is not the reason why.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30226636</id>
	<title>Re:Now this is just Stupidity at its finest</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1257180900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because it was too much of an imposition to ask him to spend 2 minutes posting 144 characters or less to help for whatever good it might have done.  What an Orwellian horror!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it was too much of an imposition to ask him to spend 2 minutes posting 144 characters or less to help for whatever good it might have done .
What an Orwellian horror !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it was too much of an imposition to ask him to spend 2 minutes posting 144 characters or less to help for whatever good it might have done.
What an Orwellian horror!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217634</id>
	<title>Well, all I know is this --</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1259095680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some lawyers are going to make a boat load of money over this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some lawyers are going to make a boat load of money over this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some lawyers are going to make a boat load of money over this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218206</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1259055180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
It was also on private property, so the mall owners, who were in on it. were responsible for the venue and crowd control.
</p><p>
At these sort of things, the police usually have a presence, either officially, or off-duty cops making some extra cash, or both.
</p><p>
They (mall operator and police) "screwed the pooch" by letting the place get filled to over-capacity in the first place.
</p><p>
A tweet could have just as easily started a riot (watch the video).  It could also have attracted even more people to "see what the buzz was about."
</p><p>
The cops need lessons in field coordination, crowd control, and how the 14th amendment makes the first amendment apply to them.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was also on private property , so the mall owners , who were in on it .
were responsible for the venue and crowd control .
At these sort of things , the police usually have a presence , either officially , or off-duty cops making some extra cash , or both .
They ( mall operator and police ) " screwed the pooch " by letting the place get filled to over-capacity in the first place .
A tweet could have just as easily started a riot ( watch the video ) .
It could also have attracted even more people to " see what the buzz was about .
" The cops need lessons in field coordination , crowd control , and how the 14th amendment makes the first amendment apply to them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
It was also on private property, so the mall owners, who were in on it.
were responsible for the venue and crowd control.
At these sort of things, the police usually have a presence, either officially, or off-duty cops making some extra cash, or both.
They (mall operator and police) "screwed the pooch" by letting the place get filled to over-capacity in the first place.
A tweet could have just as easily started a riot (watch the video).
It could also have attracted even more people to "see what the buzz was about.
"

The cops need lessons in field coordination, crowd control, and how the 14th amendment makes the first amendment apply to them.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218196</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>thickdiick</author>
	<datestamp>1259055120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's like saying you support freedom of speech only as long as it's NOT exercised in front of the Capitol building, in National Parks, public beaches, post offices, police stations, courts, schools, et cetera. <br> <br>Yeah, brilliant thinking on your part.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's like saying you support freedom of speech only as long as it 's NOT exercised in front of the Capitol building , in National Parks , public beaches , post offices , police stations , courts , schools , et cetera .
Yeah , brilliant thinking on your part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's like saying you support freedom of speech only as long as it's NOT exercised in front of the Capitol building, in National Parks, public beaches, post offices, police stations, courts, schools, et cetera.
Yeah, brilliant thinking on your part.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30220656</id>
	<title>Re:Now this is just Stupidity at its finest</title>
	<author>masmullin</author>
	<datestamp>1259066340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's not the point.  The point is the cops told him to do something and he didn't do it... in the old days he'd get raped by a billy club.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not the point .
The point is the cops told him to do something and he did n't do it... in the old days he 'd get raped by a billy club .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not the point.
The point is the cops told him to do something and he didn't do it... in the old days he'd get raped by a billy club.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217588</id>
	<title>Crap</title>
	<author>wkurzius</author>
	<datestamp>1259095440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>According to police, the crowd was broken up after safety concerns were raised, but Bieber's record exec, James Roppo, Tweeted that the singer was still signing. This caused fans to go berzerk and rush forward, breaking down barriers.</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.limelife.com/blog-entry/Fans-of-Tween-King-Justin-Bieber-Cause-Mall-Riot/26650.html" title="limelife.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.limelife.com/blog-entry/Fans-of-Tween-King-Justin-Bieber-Cause-Mall-Riot/26650.html</a> [limelife.com] </p><p><div class="quote"><p>Roppo continued to tweet about the autograph signing even after it was canceled and ended up being arrested for reckless endangerment among other crimes.</p></div><p> <a href="http://military.rightpundits.com/2009/11/24/james-roppo-man-arrested-for-not-tweeting-cancellation-of-justin-bieber-event-photos/" title="rightpundits.com" rel="nofollow">http://military.rightpundits.com/2009/11/24/james-roppo-man-arrested-for-not-tweeting-cancellation-of-justin-bieber-event-photos/</a> [rightpundits.com]</p><p>Crappy summary linking to crappy reporting.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to police , the crowd was broken up after safety concerns were raised , but Bieber 's record exec , James Roppo , Tweeted that the singer was still signing .
This caused fans to go berzerk and rush forward , breaking down barriers .
http : //www.limelife.com/blog-entry/Fans-of-Tween-King-Justin-Bieber-Cause-Mall-Riot/26650.html [ limelife.com ] Roppo continued to tweet about the autograph signing even after it was canceled and ended up being arrested for reckless endangerment among other crimes .
http : //military.rightpundits.com/2009/11/24/james-roppo-man-arrested-for-not-tweeting-cancellation-of-justin-bieber-event-photos/ [ rightpundits.com ] Crappy summary linking to crappy reporting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to police, the crowd was broken up after safety concerns were raised, but Bieber's record exec, James Roppo, Tweeted that the singer was still signing.
This caused fans to go berzerk and rush forward, breaking down barriers.
http://www.limelife.com/blog-entry/Fans-of-Tween-King-Justin-Bieber-Cause-Mall-Riot/26650.html [limelife.com] Roppo continued to tweet about the autograph signing even after it was canceled and ended up being arrested for reckless endangerment among other crimes.
http://military.rightpundits.com/2009/11/24/james-roppo-man-arrested-for-not-tweeting-cancellation-of-justin-bieber-event-photos/ [rightpundits.com]Crappy summary linking to crappy reporting.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217818</id>
	<title>retarded...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259053260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who's to say the crowd, in danger according to this article, would read and take advice from Twitter? Besides, when a crowd like that endangers itself, all we can hope for is that they kill each other off with their immense stupidity. To them I say, get a life, and then don't endanger it out of infatuation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who 's to say the crowd , in danger according to this article , would read and take advice from Twitter ?
Besides , when a crowd like that endangers itself , all we can hope for is that they kill each other off with their immense stupidity .
To them I say , get a life , and then do n't endanger it out of infatuation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who's to say the crowd, in danger according to this article, would read and take advice from Twitter?
Besides, when a crowd like that endangers itself, all we can hope for is that they kill each other off with their immense stupidity.
To them I say, get a life, and then don't endanger it out of infatuation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219806</id>
	<title>read between the lines</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259062320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>he hindered their crowd-control efforts [...] police wanted the man to send a tweet</p></div></blockquote><p>

so what I'm reading here is that the authorities are now trying to use the intarweb for controling the people, which is the exact oposite of what the internet (imho) is all about...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>he hindered their crowd-control efforts [ ... ] police wanted the man to send a tweet so what I 'm reading here is that the authorities are now trying to use the intarweb for controling the people , which is the exact oposite of what the internet ( imho ) is all about.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he hindered their crowd-control efforts [...] police wanted the man to send a tweet

so what I'm reading here is that the authorities are now trying to use the intarweb for controling the people, which is the exact oposite of what the internet (imho) is all about...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217386</id>
	<title>Remain calm.</title>
	<author>Aphoxema</author>
	<datestamp>1259094600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, hay guyz I juss got a tweet saying we need to chillax and GTFO sall cool tho cuz they let us kno on twit</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , hay guyz I juss got a tweet saying we need to chillax and GTFO sall cool tho cuz they let us kno on twit</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, hay guyz I juss got a tweet saying we need to chillax and GTFO sall cool tho cuz they let us kno on twit</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218490</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>Idbar</author>
	<datestamp>1259056440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Have you watched the video?</i> <br>
The screaming teens wouldn't let me go too far in the video. For the safety of the eardrums of whomever Justin Bieber is, I think canceling the event was appropriate, glasses may have shattered.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you watched the video ?
The screaming teens would n't let me go too far in the video .
For the safety of the eardrums of whomever Justin Bieber is , I think canceling the event was appropriate , glasses may have shattered .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you watched the video?
The screaming teens wouldn't let me go too far in the video.
For the safety of the eardrums of whomever Justin Bieber is, I think canceling the event was appropriate, glasses may have shattered.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219120</id>
	<title>Re:Riotous rumor</title>
	<author>brkello</author>
	<datestamp>1259059140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you read previous posts, how could you have missed all the ones that were stating the facts about the article?  I'll repeat, it was to stop more people from showing up at the event, not to disperse the crowd.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you read previous posts , how could you have missed all the ones that were stating the facts about the article ?
I 'll repeat , it was to stop more people from showing up at the event , not to disperse the crowd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you read previous posts, how could you have missed all the ones that were stating the facts about the article?
I'll repeat, it was to stop more people from showing up at the event, not to disperse the crowd.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217320</id>
	<title>Ahh Slashdot</title>
	<author>George Beech</author>
	<datestamp>1259094240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>He was not arrested for "felony assault" he was arrested for, and i quote TFA:<blockquote><div><p>He was in custody Friday night, pending charges that could include criminal nuisance, endangering the welfare of a minor and obstructing government administration, Smith said.</p></div></blockquote><p>

And no i'm not new here.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He was not arrested for " felony assault " he was arrested for , and i quote TFA : He was in custody Friday night , pending charges that could include criminal nuisance , endangering the welfare of a minor and obstructing government administration , Smith said .
And no i 'm not new here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He was not arrested for "felony assault" he was arrested for, and i quote TFA:He was in custody Friday night, pending charges that could include criminal nuisance, endangering the welfare of a minor and obstructing government administration, Smith said.
And no i'm not new here.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218224</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>jopsen</author>
	<datestamp>1259055300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sorry, despite freedom of speech and assembly, people don't have the right to set up giant panicky dangerous packed mob. You want to address a huge crowd, you put it somewhere a huge crowd can fit, with actual crowd control measures.</p></div><p>True, if you want to address a huge crowd, please do it a place with barriers, tear gas pipes and a huge barb wire fence...<br>
<br>
Sorry, but it's fun to interpret like a paranoid conspiracy believing American<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)
<br> (Not that I'm either American or paranoid...)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , despite freedom of speech and assembly , people do n't have the right to set up giant panicky dangerous packed mob .
You want to address a huge crowd , you put it somewhere a huge crowd can fit , with actual crowd control measures.True , if you want to address a huge crowd , please do it a place with barriers , tear gas pipes and a huge barb wire fence.. . Sorry , but it 's fun to interpret like a paranoid conspiracy believing American : ) ( Not that I 'm either American or paranoid... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, despite freedom of speech and assembly, people don't have the right to set up giant panicky dangerous packed mob.
You want to address a huge crowd, you put it somewhere a huge crowd can fit, with actual crowd control measures.True, if you want to address a huge crowd, please do it a place with barriers, tear gas pipes and a huge barb wire fence...

Sorry, but it's fun to interpret like a paranoid conspiracy believing American :)
 (Not that I'm either American or paranoid...)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30232256</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257168780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You want to address a huge crowd, you put it somewhere a huge crowd can fit, with actual crowd control measures.</p></div><p>Yeah! Take that to a free-speech zone!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/sarcasm</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You want to address a huge crowd , you put it somewhere a huge crowd can fit , with actual crowd control measures.Yeah !
Take that to a free-speech zone !
/sarcasm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You want to address a huge crowd, you put it somewhere a huge crowd can fit, with actual crowd control measures.Yeah!
Take that to a free-speech zone!
/sarcasm
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218722</id>
	<title>Best outcome for VP</title>
	<author>Reformed Lurker</author>
	<datestamp>1259057520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's face it - the whole thing was a PR exercise.  Big crowd - might make the newspapers.  Unruly crowd - we're talking TV.  Arrest me?  We've gone from teenagers knowing this guy to his name blasted all over the internet!  Can't buy that kind of PR...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's face it - the whole thing was a PR exercise .
Big crowd - might make the newspapers .
Unruly crowd - we 're talking TV .
Arrest me ?
We 've gone from teenagers knowing this guy to his name blasted all over the internet !
Ca n't buy that kind of PR.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's face it - the whole thing was a PR exercise.
Big crowd - might make the newspapers.
Unruly crowd - we're talking TV.
Arrest me?
We've gone from teenagers knowing this guy to his name blasted all over the internet!
Can't buy that kind of PR...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217932</id>
	<title>Re:Good</title>
	<author>gfreeman</author>
	<datestamp>1259053860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>tl;dr</p><p>&gt;140 characters</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>tl ; dr &gt; 140 characters</tokentext>
<sentencetext>tl;dr&gt;140 characters</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217648</id>
	<title>scary</title>
	<author>zerosomething</author>
	<datestamp>1259095740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I dont' know about you but there ain't much more scary than thousands of screaming 12 year old girls. They should throw the whole group in jail or messing with teenage hormones.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I dont ' know about you but there ai n't much more scary than thousands of screaming 12 year old girls .
They should throw the whole group in jail or messing with teenage hormones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dont' know about you but there ain't much more scary than thousands of screaming 12 year old girls.
They should throw the whole group in jail or messing with teenage hormones.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218708</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>Pig Hogger</author>
	<datestamp>1259057460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <em>I'm sorry, but there is a whole lot of circumstances here beside what the oh-so-informative title says. The record label and the mall need to be held responsible for that total cluster fuck.</em> </p></div>
</blockquote><p>It is surprising that fire protection laws were not invoked; having watched a bit of the video, and seeing how the mall was pack-jammed full, the number of people present surely violated the fire safety codes (they could not have been evacuated in a timely manner in case of fire).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry , but there is a whole lot of circumstances here beside what the oh-so-informative title says .
The record label and the mall need to be held responsible for that total cluster fuck .
It is surprising that fire protection laws were not invoked ; having watched a bit of the video , and seeing how the mall was pack-jammed full , the number of people present surely violated the fire safety codes ( they could not have been evacuated in a timely manner in case of fire ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I'm sorry, but there is a whole lot of circumstances here beside what the oh-so-informative title says.
The record label and the mall need to be held responsible for that total cluster fuck.
It is surprising that fire protection laws were not invoked; having watched a bit of the video, and seeing how the mall was pack-jammed full, the number of people present surely violated the fire safety codes (they could not have been evacuated in a timely manner in case of fire).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217990</id>
	<title>Re:Posters here are like the teens in the vid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259054100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why don't you hold the crowd responsible?  People don't have to keep showing up when they see it's a mad house.  They decided to partake in the sh*t show so they should take some responsibility.  But from the looks of it, 90\% of them are little girls.  What parents would let their kid go to something like that?  My parents would've laughed in my face and slapped me if I tried to get them to take me to something like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't you hold the crowd responsible ?
People do n't have to keep showing up when they see it 's a mad house .
They decided to partake in the sh * t show so they should take some responsibility .
But from the looks of it , 90 \ % of them are little girls .
What parents would let their kid go to something like that ?
My parents would 've laughed in my face and slapped me if I tried to get them to take me to something like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't you hold the crowd responsible?
People don't have to keep showing up when they see it's a mad house.
They decided to partake in the sh*t show so they should take some responsibility.
But from the looks of it, 90\% of them are little girls.
What parents would let their kid go to something like that?
My parents would've laughed in my face and slapped me if I tried to get them to take me to something like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217332</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259094240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>How long before this is held up as an example of why the forces of Public Safety(tm) need to be given the ability to impersonate any twitter user, for the security of the people?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How long before this is held up as an example of why the forces of Public Safety ( tm ) need to be given the ability to impersonate any twitter user , for the security of the people ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long before this is held up as an example of why the forces of Public Safety(tm) need to be given the ability to impersonate any twitter user, for the security of the people?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30220782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30222848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30232256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30222146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30223816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30223302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30220656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30220040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218582
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30223620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30222440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218708
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30226636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30220634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221676
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30223330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30220946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30222038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_174259_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221064
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217434
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30220946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30223302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30222038
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30220782
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217396
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218030
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218082
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217386
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217710
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30222440
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217894
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217580
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217686
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217448
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217516
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217360
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219120
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218556
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218152
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218370
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221610
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217364
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217932
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217440
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217714
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30220040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217832
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218206
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30220634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218570
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30222848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217454
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217698
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217584
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218224
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30222146
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221624
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218872
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217990
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221990
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218196
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30232256
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30221676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30223620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217762
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219806
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30223816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30219648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218838
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30223330
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217436
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_174259.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217628
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30226636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30218454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30217814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_174259.30220656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
