<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_23_1721206</id>
	<title>Modern Tech Versus the Past</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1259002080000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>CNETNate writes <i>"Most of us assume modern life is the peak of human achievement, but is it really? CNET decided to take a look at the major technologies of the modern world and <a href="http://crave.cnet.co.uk/gadgets/0,39029552,49303991,00.htm">compare them to their closest equivalent of pre-digital mankind</a> &mdash; Facebook vs. dinner parties, <em>World of Warcraft</em> vs. actual war craft, iPhones vs. hills on fire &mdash; and the results are surprising. And slightly dumb, so laugh."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>CNETNate writes " Most of us assume modern life is the peak of human achievement , but is it really ?
CNET decided to take a look at the major technologies of the modern world and compare them to their closest equivalent of pre-digital mankind    Facebook vs. dinner parties , World of Warcraft vs. actual war craft , iPhones vs. hills on fire    and the results are surprising .
And slightly dumb , so laugh .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CNETNate writes "Most of us assume modern life is the peak of human achievement, but is it really?
CNET decided to take a look at the major technologies of the modern world and compare them to their closest equivalent of pre-digital mankind — Facebook vs. dinner parties, World of Warcraft vs. actual war craft, iPhones vs. hills on fire — and the results are surprising.
And slightly dumb, so laugh.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206078</id>
	<title>Re:One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1258971300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I grew up in a California foothill town with a total population of 5,000. There was one high school for the whole county and even today most of the county doesn't have access to anything better than dial up. I know for a fact we were behind the times, but I kinda enjoyed that. Sure, I wasn't texting when I was 9 years old, but I was wandering through the Cedar forests with a knife in my boot and rifle in my hand shooting at birds just for the shits of it. By 14 my friends and I had built ourselves a halfpipe for skateboarding and biking on. By 16 we had all been driving our dad's 4 WD pickups for 2 - 3 years. We paintballed in the woods every weekend. We went fishing every couple weeks or so. We went swimming when it was warm. We started snowboarding at 8 years old and were doing 360's and 720's before we got out of our parent's houses. That's why the meeting up thing was so important. If you missed catching up with your friends on the weekend, you would be shit out of luck on stuff to do for a few days.
<br> <br>
So yeah, sure, I guess I grew up under a rock, but there were some really cool things to do under that rock...far cooler than texting each other back and forth for hours saying, "I don't know what to do,"  "Me neither," "LOL this sucks," "LOL yeah," "=P," "fag lol."<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..... and so on ad infinitum.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I grew up in a California foothill town with a total population of 5,000 .
There was one high school for the whole county and even today most of the county does n't have access to anything better than dial up .
I know for a fact we were behind the times , but I kinda enjoyed that .
Sure , I was n't texting when I was 9 years old , but I was wandering through the Cedar forests with a knife in my boot and rifle in my hand shooting at birds just for the shits of it .
By 14 my friends and I had built ourselves a halfpipe for skateboarding and biking on .
By 16 we had all been driving our dad 's 4 WD pickups for 2 - 3 years .
We paintballed in the woods every weekend .
We went fishing every couple weeks or so .
We went swimming when it was warm .
We started snowboarding at 8 years old and were doing 360 's and 720 's before we got out of our parent 's houses .
That 's why the meeting up thing was so important .
If you missed catching up with your friends on the weekend , you would be shit out of luck on stuff to do for a few days .
So yeah , sure , I guess I grew up under a rock , but there were some really cool things to do under that rock...far cooler than texting each other back and forth for hours saying , " I do n't know what to do , " " Me neither , " " LOL this sucks , " " LOL yeah , " " = P , " " fag lol .
" ..... and so on ad infinitum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I grew up in a California foothill town with a total population of 5,000.
There was one high school for the whole county and even today most of the county doesn't have access to anything better than dial up.
I know for a fact we were behind the times, but I kinda enjoyed that.
Sure, I wasn't texting when I was 9 years old, but I was wandering through the Cedar forests with a knife in my boot and rifle in my hand shooting at birds just for the shits of it.
By 14 my friends and I had built ourselves a halfpipe for skateboarding and biking on.
By 16 we had all been driving our dad's 4 WD pickups for 2 - 3 years.
We paintballed in the woods every weekend.
We went fishing every couple weeks or so.
We went swimming when it was warm.
We started snowboarding at 8 years old and were doing 360's and 720's before we got out of our parent's houses.
That's why the meeting up thing was so important.
If you missed catching up with your friends on the weekend, you would be shit out of luck on stuff to do for a few days.
So yeah, sure, I guess I grew up under a rock, but there were some really cool things to do under that rock...far cooler than texting each other back and forth for hours saying, "I don't know what to do,"  "Me neither," "LOL this sucks," "LOL yeah," "=P," "fag lol.
" ..... and so on ad infinitum.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205006</id>
	<title>Re:One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>Neil Hodges</author>
	<datestamp>1259008440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always feel more assured when things are set up in advance, or at least some sort of planning met-up is set up beforehand.  Waiting 'til the last minute seems like asking for trouble, especially if the others don't pick up their cell phones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always feel more assured when things are set up in advance , or at least some sort of planning met-up is set up beforehand .
Waiting 'til the last minute seems like asking for trouble , especially if the others do n't pick up their cell phones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always feel more assured when things are set up in advance, or at least some sort of planning met-up is set up beforehand.
Waiting 'til the last minute seems like asking for trouble, especially if the others don't pick up their cell phones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207056</id>
	<title>Re:Better comparisons</title>
	<author>c6gunner</author>
	<datestamp>1258975380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wikipedia vs. walking through a museum -&gt; museum</p></div><p>Apples and oranges.  Wikipedia has more information than is typically displayed in a museum, and can be accessed more easily.  Museums have better accuracy and are more enjoyable.  It's as if you're comparing your car to a 747, and concluding that the 747 is superior.  Sure, for some things it is, but for going grocery shopping it's pretty much useless.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Microwave vs. home cooked meal -&gt; home cooking (at least in my house)</p></div><p>That's a strange sort of false-dichotomy.  You can make a "home cooked meal" with a microwave, or you can throw a can of soup-mix on a stove and a pack of store-bought fries in the oven.  The kind of meal you end up with depends more on your own cooking skills than which tools you decide to utilize.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Credit vs. Cash -&gt; depends, I vote Debit Card (best of both worlds)</p></div><p>Credit is superior by far.  If I want to use my debit card, I have to pay for the privilege.  If I use my credit card, <i>they pay me</i> every time I swipe it.  The problem which people have with credit cards (ie. using more than they can pay back) isn't inherent in the cards - it's simply a lack of personal responsibility, or poor financial planning.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wikipedia vs. walking through a museum - &gt; museumApples and oranges .
Wikipedia has more information than is typically displayed in a museum , and can be accessed more easily .
Museums have better accuracy and are more enjoyable .
It 's as if you 're comparing your car to a 747 , and concluding that the 747 is superior .
Sure , for some things it is , but for going grocery shopping it 's pretty much useless.Microwave vs. home cooked meal - &gt; home cooking ( at least in my house ) That 's a strange sort of false-dichotomy .
You can make a " home cooked meal " with a microwave , or you can throw a can of soup-mix on a stove and a pack of store-bought fries in the oven .
The kind of meal you end up with depends more on your own cooking skills than which tools you decide to utilize.Credit vs. Cash - &gt; depends , I vote Debit Card ( best of both worlds ) Credit is superior by far .
If I want to use my debit card , I have to pay for the privilege .
If I use my credit card , they pay me every time I swipe it .
The problem which people have with credit cards ( ie .
using more than they can pay back ) is n't inherent in the cards - it 's simply a lack of personal responsibility , or poor financial planning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wikipedia vs. walking through a museum -&gt; museumApples and oranges.
Wikipedia has more information than is typically displayed in a museum, and can be accessed more easily.
Museums have better accuracy and are more enjoyable.
It's as if you're comparing your car to a 747, and concluding that the 747 is superior.
Sure, for some things it is, but for going grocery shopping it's pretty much useless.Microwave vs. home cooked meal -&gt; home cooking (at least in my house)That's a strange sort of false-dichotomy.
You can make a "home cooked meal" with a microwave, or you can throw a can of soup-mix on a stove and a pack of store-bought fries in the oven.
The kind of meal you end up with depends more on your own cooking skills than which tools you decide to utilize.Credit vs. Cash -&gt; depends, I vote Debit Card (best of both worlds)Credit is superior by far.
If I want to use my debit card, I have to pay for the privilege.
If I use my credit card, they pay me every time I swipe it.
The problem which people have with credit cards (ie.
using more than they can pay back) isn't inherent in the cards - it's simply a lack of personal responsibility, or poor financial planning.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204700</id>
	<title>Poisoning people with cancer...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259006520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...which is what much of modern chemotherapy amounts too will be looked back on like we look on bloodletting to keep your humors in order.</p><p>I suspect one day people will wonder how we lived in the dark ages when they actually had doctors that were trained to cut you open and physically manipulate your insides.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...which is what much of modern chemotherapy amounts too will be looked back on like we look on bloodletting to keep your humors in order.I suspect one day people will wonder how we lived in the dark ages when they actually had doctors that were trained to cut you open and physically manipulate your insides .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...which is what much of modern chemotherapy amounts too will be looked back on like we look on bloodletting to keep your humors in order.I suspect one day people will wonder how we lived in the dark ages when they actually had doctors that were trained to cut you open and physically manipulate your insides.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206228</id>
	<title>Re:not always quite so</title>
	<author>joeman3429</author>
	<datestamp>1258971960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you were pulling a wagon to Oregon in the middle ages, I'd want to know how the hell you got to america, or alternatively, why didn't your other native american brethren have wheeled wagons?
<br> <br>
The historical implications you just made are vast and profound.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you were pulling a wagon to Oregon in the middle ages , I 'd want to know how the hell you got to america , or alternatively , why did n't your other native american brethren have wheeled wagons ?
The historical implications you just made are vast and profound .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you were pulling a wagon to Oregon in the middle ages, I'd want to know how the hell you got to america, or alternatively, why didn't your other native american brethren have wheeled wagons?
The historical implications you just made are vast and profound.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205436</id>
	<title>Re:not always quite so</title>
	<author>Neofluffybunny</author>
	<datestamp>1258968000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I say we put this to the test! I will take one Captains Hat and 12 Grandfather clocks!


ADVENTURE!

(Neofluffybunny has caught Dysentery, and died.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I say we put this to the test !
I will take one Captains Hat and 12 Grandfather clocks !
ADVENTURE ! ( Neofluffybunny has caught Dysentery , and died .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I say we put this to the test!
I will take one Captains Hat and 12 Grandfather clocks!
ADVENTURE!

(Neofluffybunny has caught Dysentery, and died.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208148</id>
	<title>Re:One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1258979820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm fifty and, with all due respect, fuck nostalgia for landline phones (although their handpiece ergonomics and audio are excellent).</p><p>They were an information bottleneck, source of intel for some parents (not mine, fortunately for me), and didn't facilitate rapid communication within groups. I would have been delighted to have a cell phone (and computer of course) back in the ancient days of the 1970s.</p><p>Modern communication tech works fine for getting together. Now all the old fuckers I hang with email each other to plan biker runs, then have our cellphones with us for convenient commo. If you aren't having big fun with modern technology, you're doing it wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm fifty and , with all due respect , fuck nostalgia for landline phones ( although their handpiece ergonomics and audio are excellent ) .They were an information bottleneck , source of intel for some parents ( not mine , fortunately for me ) , and did n't facilitate rapid communication within groups .
I would have been delighted to have a cell phone ( and computer of course ) back in the ancient days of the 1970s.Modern communication tech works fine for getting together .
Now all the old fuckers I hang with email each other to plan biker runs , then have our cellphones with us for convenient commo .
If you are n't having big fun with modern technology , you 're doing it wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm fifty and, with all due respect, fuck nostalgia for landline phones (although their handpiece ergonomics and audio are excellent).They were an information bottleneck, source of intel for some parents (not mine, fortunately for me), and didn't facilitate rapid communication within groups.
I would have been delighted to have a cell phone (and computer of course) back in the ancient days of the 1970s.Modern communication tech works fine for getting together.
Now all the old fuckers I hang with email each other to plan biker runs, then have our cellphones with us for convenient commo.
If you aren't having big fun with modern technology, you're doing it wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205290</id>
	<title>Re:Probably 1940s peak of USA</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1258966980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When men were men and women cooked dinner!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When men were men and women cooked dinner !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When men were men and women cooked dinner!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207144</id>
	<title>Re:One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258975620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I am a complete dinosaur(31).  I sometimes feel that tech has distanced us from our communities(not the online version).  When last did you take the time to go round to your neighbour and have a drink, or invite them round.  And being contactable always<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... well that just sucks.

My cellphone, only gets charged now, when I really need it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...

Now if I could only break my<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. and stumble addictions, I might actually get a life<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree ... I am a complete dinosaur ( 31 ) .
I sometimes feel that tech has distanced us from our communities ( not the online version ) .
When last did you take the time to go round to your neighbour and have a drink , or invite them round .
And being contactable always ... well that just sucks .
My cellphone , only gets charged now , when I really need it .. . Now if I could only break my / .
and stumble addictions , I might actually get a life : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree ... I am a complete dinosaur(31).
I sometimes feel that tech has distanced us from our communities(not the online version).
When last did you take the time to go round to your neighbour and have a drink, or invite them round.
And being contactable always ... well that just sucks.
My cellphone, only gets charged now, when I really need it ...

Now if I could only break my /.
and stumble addictions, I might actually get a life :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205494</id>
	<title>Re:No... WoW vs pretend warfair with sticks for gu</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258968360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>WoW is the low tech equivalent of jumping out from behind a rock with a stick and shouting "bang bang!".</p></div> </blockquote><p>WoW is low tech... what are you playing?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>WoW is the low tech equivalent of jumping out from behind a rock with a stick and shouting " bang bang ! " .
WoW is low tech... what are you playing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WoW is the low tech equivalent of jumping out from behind a rock with a stick and shouting "bang bang!".
WoW is low tech... what are you playing?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206106</id>
	<title>Re:Probably 1940s peak of USA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258971420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unless you were a black person. 40's and 50's in America sucked for us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless you were a black person .
40 's and 50 's in America sucked for us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless you were a black person.
40's and 50's in America sucked for us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205130</id>
	<title>Re:Better comparisons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259009160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wikipedia vs. walking through a museum -&gt; museum<br>Microwave vs. home cooked meal -&gt; home cooking (at least in my house)<br>Credit vs. Cash -&gt; depends, I vote Debit Card (best of both worlds)<br>e-pay vs. cash/check -&gt; no more late bills, e-pay<br>Direct Deposit vs. paycheck/cash -&gt; direct deposit<br>Digital camera vs. film -&gt; except that it costs more, film, though at about 21MP i might start leaning the other way.<br>Computer + printer vs. typewrite -&gt; computer, no brainer.<br>computer vs. inkwell -&gt; though it has its aesthetics, are you kidding? computer.<br>amazon.com vs. medieval bazzar -&gt; amazon, (no pick pockets!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wikipedia vs. walking through a museum - &gt; museumMicrowave vs. home cooked meal - &gt; home cooking ( at least in my house ) Credit vs. Cash - &gt; depends , I vote Debit Card ( best of both worlds ) e-pay vs. cash/check - &gt; no more late bills , e-payDirect Deposit vs. paycheck/cash - &gt; direct depositDigital camera vs. film - &gt; except that it costs more , film , though at about 21MP i might start leaning the other way.Computer + printer vs. typewrite - &gt; computer , no brainer.computer vs. inkwell - &gt; though it has its aesthetics , are you kidding ?
computer.amazon.com vs. medieval bazzar - &gt; amazon , ( no pick pockets !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wikipedia vs. walking through a museum -&gt; museumMicrowave vs. home cooked meal -&gt; home cooking (at least in my house)Credit vs. Cash -&gt; depends, I vote Debit Card (best of both worlds)e-pay vs. cash/check -&gt; no more late bills, e-payDirect Deposit vs. paycheck/cash -&gt; direct depositDigital camera vs. film -&gt; except that it costs more, film, though at about 21MP i might start leaning the other way.Computer + printer vs. typewrite -&gt; computer, no brainer.computer vs. inkwell -&gt; though it has its aesthetics, are you kidding?
computer.amazon.com vs. medieval bazzar -&gt; amazon, (no pick pockets!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206280</id>
	<title>Re:Better comparisons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258972140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The Crusades" is more appropriate when talking about the RIAA</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The Crusades " is more appropriate when talking about the RIAA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The Crusades" is more appropriate when talking about the RIAA</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208064</id>
	<title>subby skillz</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1258979460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>And slightly dumb, so laugh.</p></div></blockquote><p>I would rather laugh at the submitter's rather superb talent for understatement.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And slightly dumb , so laugh.I would rather laugh at the submitter 's rather superb talent for understatement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And slightly dumb, so laugh.I would rather laugh at the submitter's rather superb talent for understatement.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205120</id>
	<title>World</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1259009100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thats the keyword that matters more there. Global communications (in particular with cellphones), and internet (with all the tools described in the article) have global and instant access from all the world. If you want to put in a word the difference between past and present, "World" will be what we have now, in this instant,  all of it (including the bad parts, as globalization and properly named pandemic diseases)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats the keyword that matters more there .
Global communications ( in particular with cellphones ) , and internet ( with all the tools described in the article ) have global and instant access from all the world .
If you want to put in a word the difference between past and present , " World " will be what we have now , in this instant , all of it ( including the bad parts , as globalization and properly named pandemic diseases )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats the keyword that matters more there.
Global communications (in particular with cellphones), and internet (with all the tools described in the article) have global and instant access from all the world.
If you want to put in a word the difference between past and present, "World" will be what we have now, in this instant,  all of it (including the bad parts, as globalization and properly named pandemic diseases)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30219538</id>
	<title>Re:Better comparisons</title>
	<author>Sandbags</author>
	<datestamp>1259061060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1: all the comparrisons in the article were apples/oranges...</p><p>2: depejnds on your definition of cooking.  Lets defin this more as "classic home cooking" aka, from scratch...  Again, fine print assumes a good cook!</p><p>3: WHAT!?!  Debit card is FREE.  Credit card incurs at leats a yearly fee, plus interest if you don'y pay during grace period in full.  Also, my debit card pays me about $100 every 6-9 months since I get $100 in gift cards for every 40K in transactions i run through it (and since I include 2 mortgages, 3 car payments, my insurance deductible, and every bill i have, and all the purchases we make, that goes quick).</p><p>I have 4 credit cards, the only time i use them is for truly interest free, and as a backup in emergencies (extended unemployment, major repair, etc) The rewards points are insufficint to make the trouble of manual payment tracking worth it (since the grace period if 25 days, but only a fraction of transdactions show up on the bill during that period, so sending 2-3 checks to them each month is required to avoid finance charges completely).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 : all the comparrisons in the article were apples/oranges...2 : depejnds on your definition of cooking .
Lets defin this more as " classic home cooking " aka , from scratch... Again , fine print assumes a good cook ! 3 : WHAT ! ? !
Debit card is FREE .
Credit card incurs at leats a yearly fee , plus interest if you don'y pay during grace period in full .
Also , my debit card pays me about $ 100 every 6-9 months since I get $ 100 in gift cards for every 40K in transactions i run through it ( and since I include 2 mortgages , 3 car payments , my insurance deductible , and every bill i have , and all the purchases we make , that goes quick ) .I have 4 credit cards , the only time i use them is for truly interest free , and as a backup in emergencies ( extended unemployment , major repair , etc ) The rewards points are insufficint to make the trouble of manual payment tracking worth it ( since the grace period if 25 days , but only a fraction of transdactions show up on the bill during that period , so sending 2-3 checks to them each month is required to avoid finance charges completely ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1: all the comparrisons in the article were apples/oranges...2: depejnds on your definition of cooking.
Lets defin this more as "classic home cooking" aka, from scratch...  Again, fine print assumes a good cook!3: WHAT!?!
Debit card is FREE.
Credit card incurs at leats a yearly fee, plus interest if you don'y pay during grace period in full.
Also, my debit card pays me about $100 every 6-9 months since I get $100 in gift cards for every 40K in transactions i run through it (and since I include 2 mortgages, 3 car payments, my insurance deductible, and every bill i have, and all the purchases we make, that goes quick).I have 4 credit cards, the only time i use them is for truly interest free, and as a backup in emergencies (extended unemployment, major repair, etc) The rewards points are insufficint to make the trouble of manual payment tracking worth it (since the grace period if 25 days, but only a fraction of transdactions show up on the bill during that period, so sending 2-3 checks to them each month is required to avoid finance charges completely).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205042</id>
	<title>Re:not always quite so</title>
	<author>TheRealMindChild</author>
	<datestamp>1259008620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>As an example, if you think about the medieval era and how you moved around, there we're basically two options:<br>
1) by horse</i> <br> <br>Not only that, but if you were pulling a wagon and heading toward Oregon, you were likely to be killed by a bout of dysentery.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As an example , if you think about the medieval era and how you moved around , there we 're basically two options : 1 ) by horse Not only that , but if you were pulling a wagon and heading toward Oregon , you were likely to be killed by a bout of dysentery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an example, if you think about the medieval era and how you moved around, there we're basically two options:
1) by horse  Not only that, but if you were pulling a wagon and heading toward Oregon, you were likely to be killed by a bout of dysentery.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204928</id>
	<title>So what was the Slashdot of the past . . . ?</title>
	<author>PolygamousRanchKid </author>
	<datestamp>1259007900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Craftsmen's Guilds come to mind: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guild" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guild</a> [wikipedia.org]. "They were organized in a manner something between a trade union, a cartel and a secret society . . . tended to form associations based on their trades  . . . each of whom controlled secrets of traditionally imparted technology, the "arts" or "mysteries" of their crafts."
</p><p>They had bizarre initiation rituals,  We have goatse.
</p><p>They had secret phrases.  We have, "in Soviet . . . X, Y's you!"
</p><p>They had a monopoly on their trade. We get outsourced.
</p><p>Oh, I guess they won.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Craftsmen 's Guilds come to mind : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guild [ wikipedia.org ] .
" They were organized in a manner something between a trade union , a cartel and a secret society .
. .
tended to form associations based on their trades .
. .
each of whom controlled secrets of traditionally imparted technology , the " arts " or " mysteries " of their crafts .
" They had bizarre initiation rituals , We have goatse .
They had secret phrases .
We have , " in Soviet .
. .
X , Y 's you !
" They had a monopoly on their trade .
We get outsourced .
Oh , I guess they won .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Craftsmen's Guilds come to mind: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guild [wikipedia.org].
"They were organized in a manner something between a trade union, a cartel and a secret society .
. .
tended to form associations based on their trades  .
. .
each of whom controlled secrets of traditionally imparted technology, the "arts" or "mysteries" of their crafts.
"
They had bizarre initiation rituals,  We have goatse.
They had secret phrases.
We have, "in Soviet .
. .
X, Y's you!
"
They had a monopoly on their trade.
We get outsourced.
Oh, I guess they won.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30209890</id>
	<title>Re:WoW does not equal War</title>
	<author>tabrnaker</author>
	<datestamp>1258994160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure you start off with rags, but that's what leveling up is for.

Duh!  We don't run around killing monsters nowadays because all the high level hero's in the past exterminated them!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure you start off with rags , but that 's what leveling up is for .
Duh ! We do n't run around killing monsters nowadays because all the high level hero 's in the past exterminated them !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure you start off with rags, but that's what leveling up is for.
Duh!  We don't run around killing monsters nowadays because all the high level hero's in the past exterminated them!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204922</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204806</id>
	<title>2fer - Zombies that run vs zombies that shuffle</title>
	<author>KharmaWidow</author>
	<datestamp>1259007180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Endless useless meetings and reports vs forging and basic survival</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Endless useless meetings and reports vs forging and basic survival</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Endless useless meetings and reports vs forging and basic survival</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205028</id>
	<title>Re:One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>jez9999</author>
	<datestamp>1259008560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You, sir, have had a VERY different childhood to me.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You , sir , have had a VERY different childhood to me .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You, sir, have had a VERY different childhood to me.
:-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204896</id>
	<title>Not an ad</title>
	<author>flabordec</author>
	<datestamp>1259007720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>CNETNate would like to remind you that this CNET article is not an advertisement, it really is news for nerds and stuff that matters.</htmltext>
<tokenext>CNETNate would like to remind you that this CNET article is not an advertisement , it really is news for nerds and stuff that matters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CNETNate would like to remind you that this CNET article is not an advertisement, it really is news for nerds and stuff that matters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205004</id>
	<title>Other topics</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1259008380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wimmen vs internet pr0n websites...</p><p>Remember the old geocities type web pages with absolutely everything on one staggeringly long page vs "clickthru articles" with about one paragraph per page of ads...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wimmen vs internet pr0n websites...Remember the old geocities type web pages with absolutely everything on one staggeringly long page vs " clickthru articles " with about one paragraph per page of ads.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wimmen vs internet pr0n websites...Remember the old geocities type web pages with absolutely everything on one staggeringly long page vs "clickthru articles" with about one paragraph per page of ads...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206008</id>
	<title>Re:Probably 1940s peak of USA</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1258971000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you are partly right, but for the wrong reasons. If you talk to people who lived through the Great Depression and WW2, it was sacrifice and suffering, but people felt like they had a purpose.  In the 1950s, things got economically better, but there was a sense that we'd been put on the Earth to face down communism.</p><p>As far as writing and the arts are concerned, you're way off base.  People are *still* doing the kind of art they did back then. It's just not avante garde.  If don't like the art at the snobby local gallery, head down to the flea market.</p><p>As far as drugs are concerned, they had most of the biggies like heroin, cocaine, weed, tobacco and of course alcohol.   And speaking of sex, the baby boom came from *somewhere*.  As far as people out of wedlock are concerned, the teen pregnancy rate in the 1950s was *higher* than today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you are partly right , but for the wrong reasons .
If you talk to people who lived through the Great Depression and WW2 , it was sacrifice and suffering , but people felt like they had a purpose .
In the 1950s , things got economically better , but there was a sense that we 'd been put on the Earth to face down communism.As far as writing and the arts are concerned , you 're way off base .
People are * still * doing the kind of art they did back then .
It 's just not avante garde .
If do n't like the art at the snobby local gallery , head down to the flea market.As far as drugs are concerned , they had most of the biggies like heroin , cocaine , weed , tobacco and of course alcohol .
And speaking of sex , the baby boom came from * somewhere * .
As far as people out of wedlock are concerned , the teen pregnancy rate in the 1950s was * higher * than today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you are partly right, but for the wrong reasons.
If you talk to people who lived through the Great Depression and WW2, it was sacrifice and suffering, but people felt like they had a purpose.
In the 1950s, things got economically better, but there was a sense that we'd been put on the Earth to face down communism.As far as writing and the arts are concerned, you're way off base.
People are *still* doing the kind of art they did back then.
It's just not avante garde.
If don't like the art at the snobby local gallery, head down to the flea market.As far as drugs are concerned, they had most of the biggies like heroin, cocaine, weed, tobacco and of course alcohol.
And speaking of sex, the baby boom came from *somewhere*.
As far as people out of wedlock are concerned, the teen pregnancy rate in the 1950s was *higher* than today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30210170</id>
	<title>The biggest difference - inequality</title>
	<author>acheron12</author>
	<datestamp>1258997940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who could afford to send a telegram, or visit a doctor? Not the lower classes, except in absolute emergencies. And there was almost no middle class to speak of back then.</p><p>Being a lord in a giant castle may not seem so bad, but the life of the peasant majority doing the actual work was far less rosy. Of course, it's not entertaining to hear about somebody's life of toil, so any movie or book about 'the past' focuses on the idle upper crust - apparently leading some people to think everyone lived like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who could afford to send a telegram , or visit a doctor ?
Not the lower classes , except in absolute emergencies .
And there was almost no middle class to speak of back then.Being a lord in a giant castle may not seem so bad , but the life of the peasant majority doing the actual work was far less rosy .
Of course , it 's not entertaining to hear about somebody 's life of toil , so any movie or book about 'the past ' focuses on the idle upper crust - apparently leading some people to think everyone lived like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who could afford to send a telegram, or visit a doctor?
Not the lower classes, except in absolute emergencies.
And there was almost no middle class to speak of back then.Being a lord in a giant castle may not seem so bad, but the life of the peasant majority doing the actual work was far less rosy.
Of course, it's not entertaining to hear about somebody's life of toil, so any movie or book about 'the past' focuses on the idle upper crust - apparently leading some people to think everyone lived like that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204918</id>
	<title>agree 100\%</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259007840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And I'm 26.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And I 'm 26 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I'm 26.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205620</id>
	<title>Expected?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258969080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Non-sense, nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Non-sense , nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Non-sense, nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204664</id>
	<title>No... WoW vs pretend warfair with sticks for guns.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259006280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry. We geeks playing World of Warcraft would not be engaged in killing each other if not for the game. WoW is the low tech equivalent of jumping out from behind a rock with a stick and shouting "bang bang!". And the WoW forums are the equivalent of "I shot you your dead! Am not!" arguments.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry .
We geeks playing World of Warcraft would not be engaged in killing each other if not for the game .
WoW is the low tech equivalent of jumping out from behind a rock with a stick and shouting " bang bang ! " .
And the WoW forums are the equivalent of " I shot you your dead !
Am not !
" arguments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry.
We geeks playing World of Warcraft would not be engaged in killing each other if not for the game.
WoW is the low tech equivalent of jumping out from behind a rock with a stick and shouting "bang bang!".
And the WoW forums are the equivalent of "I shot you your dead!
Am not!
" arguments.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204712</id>
	<title>telegraph 419....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259006520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i represent the duke of america and recently a $25,000 sum of pirate spanish gold seized off the coast has been placed in our care.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i represent the duke of america and recently a $ 25,000 sum of pirate spanish gold seized off the coast has been placed in our care.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i represent the duke of america and recently a $25,000 sum of pirate spanish gold seized off the coast has been placed in our care.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205410</id>
	<title>Re: Bang Bang!</title>
	<author>TaoPhoenix</author>
	<datestamp>1258967880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Beautiful setup.</p><p>They had jumping out from behind a rock with a stick and shouting "bang bang! I shot you dead!"</p><p>We have: Cher "Bang Bang"<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLmlS66AA80" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLmlS66AA80</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Beautiful setup.They had jumping out from behind a rock with a stick and shouting " bang bang !
I shot you dead !
" We have : Cher " Bang Bang " http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = vLmlS66AA80 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Beautiful setup.They had jumping out from behind a rock with a stick and shouting "bang bang!
I shot you dead!
"We have: Cher "Bang Bang"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLmlS66AA80 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30213224</id>
	<title>Re:No... WoW vs pretend warfair with sticks for gu</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259075460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good for you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good for you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206790</id>
	<title>Re:Printer vs Scribes</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1258974360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>How many scribes is one printer worth?</i> </p><p>How many printers can output an illuminated Book Of Hours which will retain its rich colors and gold decoration for over 600 years?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many scribes is one printer worth ?
How many printers can output an illuminated Book Of Hours which will retain its rich colors and gold decoration for over 600 years ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many scribes is one printer worth?
How many printers can output an illuminated Book Of Hours which will retain its rich colors and gold decoration for over 600 years?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30209908</id>
	<title>Re:not always quite so</title>
	<author>theshowmecanuck</author>
	<datestamp>1258994460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And if you were on your way to California, you might be <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donner\_Party" title="wikipedia.org">eaten by one of your friends or family</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>And if you were on your way to California , you might be eaten by one of your friends or family [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if you were on your way to California, you might be eaten by one of your friends or family [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205900</id>
	<title>Trebuchet vs. Howitzer</title>
	<author>Theodore</author>
	<datestamp>1258970520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The trebuchet has the advantage in that it can fire anything...<br>Which is scarier?<br>"SCREEEEEEEECHMM"...BOOM!"<br>or...<br>"MOOOOOOOOOOOOO... SPLAT!"<br>or... (for dramatic effect)...<br>"Are those HEADS they're throwing at us?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The trebuchet has the advantage in that it can fire anything...Which is scarier ? " SCREEEEEEEECHMM " ...BOOM ! " or... " MOOOOOOOOOOOOO.. .
SPLAT ! " or... ( for dramatic effect ) ... " Are those HEADS they 're throwing at us ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The trebuchet has the advantage in that it can fire anything...Which is scarier?"SCREEEEEEEECHMM"...BOOM!"or..."MOOOOOOOOOOOOO...
SPLAT!"or... (for dramatic effect)..."Are those HEADS they're throwing at us?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205064</id>
	<title>The problem with cell phones</title>
	<author>sgt\_doom</author>
	<datestamp>1259008800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But cell phones causes one to reevaluate their fellow man (or Ameritard).  Pre-cells, one hoped all those surveys demonstrating how totally ignorant your fellow citizens were was just so much balderdash --- now we know they were all too true.</p><p>At least we Americans have the bullet train.  Oops!  Nope, that's the Japanese and French.  Well, at least we Americans have really cool seaport architecture.  Nope, that's the Danish. Damn!  We're backwards here in Amerika!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But cell phones causes one to reevaluate their fellow man ( or Ameritard ) .
Pre-cells , one hoped all those surveys demonstrating how totally ignorant your fellow citizens were was just so much balderdash --- now we know they were all too true.At least we Americans have the bullet train .
Oops ! Nope , that 's the Japanese and French .
Well , at least we Americans have really cool seaport architecture .
Nope , that 's the Danish .
Damn ! We 're backwards here in Amerika !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But cell phones causes one to reevaluate their fellow man (or Ameritard).
Pre-cells, one hoped all those surveys demonstrating how totally ignorant your fellow citizens were was just so much balderdash --- now we know they were all too true.At least we Americans have the bullet train.
Oops!  Nope, that's the Japanese and French.
Well, at least we Americans have really cool seaport architecture.
Nope, that's the Danish.
Damn!  We're backwards here in Amerika!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205272</id>
	<title>Re:Printer vs Scribes</title>
	<author>PolygamousRanchKid </author>
	<datestamp>1258966980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Scribes weren't just copy machines; they were artists.
</p><p>I recently saw a documentary on how ancient Egyptians would commission a copy of "The Book of the Dead," to be placed in their funeral grave.  They did this in the temple, where, for a small fee, the temple scribes would create a personalized version.  A work of art.
</p><p>This book was important, because it contained instructions to allow the deceased to pass through obstacles in the afterlife.  So folks didn't skimp on the cost.
</p><p>I don't think that the Ibis-headed and Jackal-headed Gods in the afterlife would be impressed with anything that you can crank out on your HP printer.
</p><p>Oh, and I bet that a scribe costs less than a printer cartridge for your printer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Scribes were n't just copy machines ; they were artists .
I recently saw a documentary on how ancient Egyptians would commission a copy of " The Book of the Dead , " to be placed in their funeral grave .
They did this in the temple , where , for a small fee , the temple scribes would create a personalized version .
A work of art .
This book was important , because it contained instructions to allow the deceased to pass through obstacles in the afterlife .
So folks did n't skimp on the cost .
I do n't think that the Ibis-headed and Jackal-headed Gods in the afterlife would be impressed with anything that you can crank out on your HP printer .
Oh , and I bet that a scribe costs less than a printer cartridge for your printer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scribes weren't just copy machines; they were artists.
I recently saw a documentary on how ancient Egyptians would commission a copy of "The Book of the Dead," to be placed in their funeral grave.
They did this in the temple, where, for a small fee, the temple scribes would create a personalized version.
A work of art.
This book was important, because it contained instructions to allow the deceased to pass through obstacles in the afterlife.
So folks didn't skimp on the cost.
I don't think that the Ibis-headed and Jackal-headed Gods in the afterlife would be impressed with anything that you can crank out on your HP printer.
Oh, and I bet that a scribe costs less than a printer cartridge for your printer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204926</id>
	<title>Re:One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259007900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wish I had modpoints, because this is, by far, the most deserving post of a +5 I have ever read.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish I had modpoints , because this is , by far , the most deserving post of a + 5 I have ever read .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish I had modpoints, because this is, by far, the most deserving post of a +5 I have ever read.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207680</id>
	<title>Re:Better comparisons</title>
	<author>quercus.aeternam</author>
	<datestamp>1258977600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wouldn't expect the Spanish Inquisition even after I saw them.</p><p>Who expects to be tortured mercilessly and pointlessly?<br>I sure don't.</p><p>Who expects to sit in the comfy chair?<br>I sure don't (not at work, anyway).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't expect the Spanish Inquisition even after I saw them.Who expects to be tortured mercilessly and pointlessly ? I sure do n't.Who expects to sit in the comfy chair ? I sure do n't ( not at work , anyway ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't expect the Spanish Inquisition even after I saw them.Who expects to be tortured mercilessly and pointlessly?I sure don't.Who expects to sit in the comfy chair?I sure don't (not at work, anyway).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205176</id>
	<title>Re:You don't have to go that far back...</title>
	<author>webmistressrachel</author>
	<datestamp>1259009400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is both a correction to the above and a reply to Mikael (a troll if ever I saw one!)</p><p>You do know those Wharfedales are frigging OLD, right? Your false and misleading comparison, modded up with karma bonus you don't deserve is still nagging at me! Coupla hundred bucks indeed! You're the first person to go on my Foes list, right now! Check if you don't believe me! I wasted a whole post telling you that and preventing other readers of my original post from taking your advice.</p><p>In fact, do please take his advice and send all your Trinitrons, old Wharfedale / Tannoy / etc. speakers to me. Then I'll open a hifi shop with a listening room and blackjack and hookers... oh dear now I'm -1 Offtopic<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is both a correction to the above and a reply to Mikael ( a troll if ever I saw one !
) You do know those Wharfedales are frigging OLD , right ?
Your false and misleading comparison , modded up with karma bonus you do n't deserve is still nagging at me !
Coupla hundred bucks indeed !
You 're the first person to go on my Foes list , right now !
Check if you do n't believe me !
I wasted a whole post telling you that and preventing other readers of my original post from taking your advice.In fact , do please take his advice and send all your Trinitrons , old Wharfedale / Tannoy / etc .
speakers to me .
Then I 'll open a hifi shop with a listening room and blackjack and hookers... oh dear now I 'm -1 Offtopic ; -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is both a correction to the above and a reply to Mikael (a troll if ever I saw one!
)You do know those Wharfedales are frigging OLD, right?
Your false and misleading comparison, modded up with karma bonus you don't deserve is still nagging at me!
Coupla hundred bucks indeed!
You're the first person to go on my Foes list, right now!
Check if you don't believe me!
I wasted a whole post telling you that and preventing other readers of my original post from taking your advice.In fact, do please take his advice and send all your Trinitrons, old Wharfedale / Tannoy / etc.
speakers to me.
Then I'll open a hifi shop with a listening room and blackjack and hookers... oh dear now I'm -1 Offtopic ;-P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30209128</id>
	<title>Re:You don't have to go that far back...</title>
	<author>Al Dimond</author>
	<datestamp>1258986420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>CRT monitors beat the crap out of LCDs in similar price ranges in just about every aspect of picture and video quality, it's true. But LCDs are light and small; that's a lot more important to me. I used to have a 19" CRT. It was a beast. Took up way too much desk space, and space in the car every time I had to move it. I finally decided to get rid of it when moving away from California and none of my friends would take it for free. My current (rather old, obtained for free) 19" LCD has a tiny footprint.</p><p>The one thing I can't stand is widescreen monitors. Less visible area for bigger desk footprint. Stupid dimensions for doing anything but watching movies (but why would you watch movies on a crappy LCD computer monitor?).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>CRT monitors beat the crap out of LCDs in similar price ranges in just about every aspect of picture and video quality , it 's true .
But LCDs are light and small ; that 's a lot more important to me .
I used to have a 19 " CRT .
It was a beast .
Took up way too much desk space , and space in the car every time I had to move it .
I finally decided to get rid of it when moving away from California and none of my friends would take it for free .
My current ( rather old , obtained for free ) 19 " LCD has a tiny footprint.The one thing I ca n't stand is widescreen monitors .
Less visible area for bigger desk footprint .
Stupid dimensions for doing anything but watching movies ( but why would you watch movies on a crappy LCD computer monitor ?
) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CRT monitors beat the crap out of LCDs in similar price ranges in just about every aspect of picture and video quality, it's true.
But LCDs are light and small; that's a lot more important to me.
I used to have a 19" CRT.
It was a beast.
Took up way too much desk space, and space in the car every time I had to move it.
I finally decided to get rid of it when moving away from California and none of my friends would take it for free.
My current (rather old, obtained for free) 19" LCD has a tiny footprint.The one thing I can't stand is widescreen monitors.
Less visible area for bigger desk footprint.
Stupid dimensions for doing anything but watching movies (but why would you watch movies on a crappy LCD computer monitor?
).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204618</id>
	<title>They Missed One</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1259005980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>

We Have: Putting one page of data on one page<br>
They Had: <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/11/04/1844209/Plug-vs-Plug-mdash-Which-Nations-Socket-Is-Best" title="slashdot.org">Dividing data up into eight pages to maximize pageviews</a> [slashdot.org] <br> <br>

Thanks for finally filing this CNet Crave UK stuff in Idle/Entertainment!</htmltext>
<tokenext>We Have : Putting one page of data on one page They Had : Dividing data up into eight pages to maximize pageviews [ slashdot.org ] Thanks for finally filing this CNet Crave UK stuff in Idle/Entertainment !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>

We Have: Putting one page of data on one page
They Had: Dividing data up into eight pages to maximize pageviews [slashdot.org]  

Thanks for finally filing this CNet Crave UK stuff in Idle/Entertainment!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208174</id>
	<title>Re:nostalgia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258980000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Swine flu mass-panic vs The plague: not a very good comparison. Try AIDS and the plague."</p><p>Good call, if I recall correctly medical scientists have said that AIDS is going to surpass Black Death as the deadliest virus in recorded history in a few years. Hell they knew this a few years ago : http://www.scienceblog.com/community/older/2002/G/20021131.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Swine flu mass-panic vs The plague : not a very good comparison .
Try AIDS and the plague .
" Good call , if I recall correctly medical scientists have said that AIDS is going to surpass Black Death as the deadliest virus in recorded history in a few years .
Hell they knew this a few years ago : http : //www.scienceblog.com/community/older/2002/G/20021131.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Swine flu mass-panic vs The plague: not a very good comparison.
Try AIDS and the plague.
"Good call, if I recall correctly medical scientists have said that AIDS is going to surpass Black Death as the deadliest virus in recorded history in a few years.
Hell they knew this a few years ago : http://www.scienceblog.com/community/older/2002/G/20021131.html</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205360</id>
	<title>As of today, CNET == cracked.com, Slashdot == Digg</title>
	<author>SUB7IME</author>
	<datestamp>1258967520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This just felt like one of those cracked.com articles all over digg, instead of a slashdot-worthy article. Sorry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This just felt like one of those cracked.com articles all over digg , instead of a slashdot-worthy article .
Sorry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This just felt like one of those cracked.com articles all over digg, instead of a slashdot-worthy article.
Sorry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205138</id>
	<title>Re:Better comparisons</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1259009220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Science vs. Mad Science</p></div><p>Wait, which one is the "modern" side?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Science vs. Mad ScienceWait , which one is the " modern " side ?
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Science vs. Mad ScienceWait, which one is the "modern" side?
;-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208040</id>
	<title>I have to wonder though</title>
	<author>Moraelin</author>
	<datestamp>1258979340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, while all the modern day equivalents are better at \_some\_ times, I think the downsides the rest of the time get overlooked.</p><p>For example, yes, moving around by foot or horse all the way to Jerusalem was a lot slower, not to mention having all those pesky Saracens in the way who felt that they should continue to keep their country<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;) Nowadays you could take a plane and be there in a couple of hours.</p><p>But the downside is that you weren't expected to make that trip more than once in your life, and arguably most people got away with never doing it at all. Nowadays just because it's possible to travel faster, for a lot of people it means they're \_expected\_ to do it all the time. So when (other) people go, basically, "bah, quit complaining about leg space, be glad you can fly at all nowadays", my answer would be: yeah, but in ye olde days I wouldn't be expected to go over there in the first place.</p><p>To go back to the examples you actually used:</p><p>E.g., sure, pizza delivery is faster by moped than by foot or horse, but in ye olde days actually you wouldn't have to do it. People would have to come to your pizzeria, if they wanted a pizza. Effectively nowadays someone has to be out on their bike, no matter if it's scalding hot or massive rain, to deliver pizzas.</p><p>E.g., sure, it's easier to send an e-card or email nowadays, but it also created a culture where you're expected to spend more time with email and e-cards, than they spent writing an old fashioned letter in any other age. Communication at a distance was something for \_very\_ close friends, and for when you actually have something to say. You might write to someone once a month or a week and include just the more important thoughts or events of that interval. There is plenty of old correspondence which was actually good enough to be sold as a book. And at any rate, you had time to actually think an answer worth writing down.</p><p>The wake up call about modern day communication was when I first had a consulting job at a company where they gave me a computer with Outlook configured to act like a retarded kid trolling for attention. It wasn't even content to signal that a new email had come, but it then resorted to try to draw my attention with a big tooltip in the lower right corner. God damn it, it has an email and it wants attention RIGHT NOW! At the time it was a shock that someone would expect that I immmediately abort any other activity, right in the middle of a line of code even, and give email its attention the very second it arrived. And there are people who'll call if you didn't answer their email in 5 minutes. WTF?</p><p>The new uber-convenient form of communication didn't just become a more convenient replacement for the old, but an unholy pact with the devil. It eats up more time than the old one ever did, and created some expectations and a sense of urgency that just didn't use to be there.</p><p>Or, to go back in the land of my own examples, I was surprised to read in a study waay back, that with all the modern conveniences and time-saving devices, a modern woman actually spends more times on house chores than her ancestors ever did. The idea that this is easy, and that is easy, and that other thing is easy too, and so on, has created a sense of expectation to do them all to an extent where they all combined actually take up more time and energy than ever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , while all the modern day equivalents are better at \ _some \ _ times , I think the downsides the rest of the time get overlooked.For example , yes , moving around by foot or horse all the way to Jerusalem was a lot slower , not to mention having all those pesky Saracens in the way who felt that they should continue to keep their country ; ) Nowadays you could take a plane and be there in a couple of hours.But the downside is that you were n't expected to make that trip more than once in your life , and arguably most people got away with never doing it at all .
Nowadays just because it 's possible to travel faster , for a lot of people it means they 're \ _expected \ _ to do it all the time .
So when ( other ) people go , basically , " bah , quit complaining about leg space , be glad you can fly at all nowadays " , my answer would be : yeah , but in ye olde days I would n't be expected to go over there in the first place.To go back to the examples you actually used : E.g. , sure , pizza delivery is faster by moped than by foot or horse , but in ye olde days actually you would n't have to do it .
People would have to come to your pizzeria , if they wanted a pizza .
Effectively nowadays someone has to be out on their bike , no matter if it 's scalding hot or massive rain , to deliver pizzas.E.g. , sure , it 's easier to send an e-card or email nowadays , but it also created a culture where you 're expected to spend more time with email and e-cards , than they spent writing an old fashioned letter in any other age .
Communication at a distance was something for \ _very \ _ close friends , and for when you actually have something to say .
You might write to someone once a month or a week and include just the more important thoughts or events of that interval .
There is plenty of old correspondence which was actually good enough to be sold as a book .
And at any rate , you had time to actually think an answer worth writing down.The wake up call about modern day communication was when I first had a consulting job at a company where they gave me a computer with Outlook configured to act like a retarded kid trolling for attention .
It was n't even content to signal that a new email had come , but it then resorted to try to draw my attention with a big tooltip in the lower right corner .
God damn it , it has an email and it wants attention RIGHT NOW !
At the time it was a shock that someone would expect that I immmediately abort any other activity , right in the middle of a line of code even , and give email its attention the very second it arrived .
And there are people who 'll call if you did n't answer their email in 5 minutes .
WTF ? The new uber-convenient form of communication did n't just become a more convenient replacement for the old , but an unholy pact with the devil .
It eats up more time than the old one ever did , and created some expectations and a sense of urgency that just did n't use to be there.Or , to go back in the land of my own examples , I was surprised to read in a study waay back , that with all the modern conveniences and time-saving devices , a modern woman actually spends more times on house chores than her ancestors ever did .
The idea that this is easy , and that is easy , and that other thing is easy too , and so on , has created a sense of expectation to do them all to an extent where they all combined actually take up more time and energy than ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, while all the modern day equivalents are better at \_some\_ times, I think the downsides the rest of the time get overlooked.For example, yes, moving around by foot or horse all the way to Jerusalem was a lot slower, not to mention having all those pesky Saracens in the way who felt that they should continue to keep their country ;) Nowadays you could take a plane and be there in a couple of hours.But the downside is that you weren't expected to make that trip more than once in your life, and arguably most people got away with never doing it at all.
Nowadays just because it's possible to travel faster, for a lot of people it means they're \_expected\_ to do it all the time.
So when (other) people go, basically, "bah, quit complaining about leg space, be glad you can fly at all nowadays", my answer would be: yeah, but in ye olde days I wouldn't be expected to go over there in the first place.To go back to the examples you actually used:E.g., sure, pizza delivery is faster by moped than by foot or horse, but in ye olde days actually you wouldn't have to do it.
People would have to come to your pizzeria, if they wanted a pizza.
Effectively nowadays someone has to be out on their bike, no matter if it's scalding hot or massive rain, to deliver pizzas.E.g., sure, it's easier to send an e-card or email nowadays, but it also created a culture where you're expected to spend more time with email and e-cards, than they spent writing an old fashioned letter in any other age.
Communication at a distance was something for \_very\_ close friends, and for when you actually have something to say.
You might write to someone once a month or a week and include just the more important thoughts or events of that interval.
There is plenty of old correspondence which was actually good enough to be sold as a book.
And at any rate, you had time to actually think an answer worth writing down.The wake up call about modern day communication was when I first had a consulting job at a company where they gave me a computer with Outlook configured to act like a retarded kid trolling for attention.
It wasn't even content to signal that a new email had come, but it then resorted to try to draw my attention with a big tooltip in the lower right corner.
God damn it, it has an email and it wants attention RIGHT NOW!
At the time it was a shock that someone would expect that I immmediately abort any other activity, right in the middle of a line of code even, and give email its attention the very second it arrived.
And there are people who'll call if you didn't answer their email in 5 minutes.
WTF?The new uber-convenient form of communication didn't just become a more convenient replacement for the old, but an unholy pact with the devil.
It eats up more time than the old one ever did, and created some expectations and a sense of urgency that just didn't use to be there.Or, to go back in the land of my own examples, I was surprised to read in a study waay back, that with all the modern conveniences and time-saving devices, a modern woman actually spends more times on house chores than her ancestors ever did.
The idea that this is easy, and that is easy, and that other thing is easy too, and so on, has created a sense of expectation to do them all to an extent where they all combined actually take up more time and energy than ever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205016</id>
	<title>Printer vs Scribes</title>
	<author>Dalzhim</author>
	<datestamp>1259008440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How many scribes is one printer worth?
I don't have any idea what the exact number could be, but I'm pretty sure this comparison wasn't included in CNet's article because there's no way you can get the scribes to win.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How many scribes is one printer worth ?
I do n't have any idea what the exact number could be , but I 'm pretty sure this comparison was n't included in CNet 's article because there 's no way you can get the scribes to win .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many scribes is one printer worth?
I don't have any idea what the exact number could be, but I'm pretty sure this comparison wasn't included in CNet's article because there's no way you can get the scribes to win.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734</id>
	<title>Better comparisons</title>
	<author>SoundGuyNoise</author>
	<datestamp>1259006640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>MP3s vs. 1 Man Bands<br>
Twitter vs. Bathroom Walls<br>
Science vs. Mad Science</htmltext>
<tokenext>MP3s vs. 1 Man Bands Twitter vs. Bathroom Walls Science vs. Mad Science</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MP3s vs. 1 Man Bands
Twitter vs. Bathroom Walls
Science vs. Mad Science</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205114</id>
	<title>Re:One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>onepoint</author>
	<datestamp>1259009100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm about twice your age, and we had a hang-out spots for night time, one for day time ( arcade ), and out favorite fishing holes for Saturday morning. if you got lost from one spot to another, call your night quits or try to find us.</p><p>you could get blasted drunk ( 18 was the drinking age back then ) and get home safely in a cab and still make it to go fishing at 6am.</p><p>when you made plans, you stuck to them, "pick you up at 8" meant you are ready at 8pm. however when you are picking up a girl, 8pm is when you got there, she made you wait.</p><p>got a girls number from your going out the night before, answer the phone or hope that the answer machine is working, otherwise you missed the call ( or worst your mom got the phone )</p><p>some funny moments.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm about twice your age , and we had a hang-out spots for night time , one for day time ( arcade ) , and out favorite fishing holes for Saturday morning .
if you got lost from one spot to another , call your night quits or try to find us.you could get blasted drunk ( 18 was the drinking age back then ) and get home safely in a cab and still make it to go fishing at 6am.when you made plans , you stuck to them , " pick you up at 8 " meant you are ready at 8pm .
however when you are picking up a girl , 8pm is when you got there , she made you wait.got a girls number from your going out the night before , answer the phone or hope that the answer machine is working , otherwise you missed the call ( or worst your mom got the phone ) some funny moments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm about twice your age, and we had a hang-out spots for night time, one for day time ( arcade ), and out favorite fishing holes for Saturday morning.
if you got lost from one spot to another, call your night quits or try to find us.you could get blasted drunk ( 18 was the drinking age back then ) and get home safely in a cab and still make it to go fishing at 6am.when you made plans, you stuck to them, "pick you up at 8" meant you are ready at 8pm.
however when you are picking up a girl, 8pm is when you got there, she made you wait.got a girls number from your going out the night before, answer the phone or hope that the answer machine is working, otherwise you missed the call ( or worst your mom got the phone )some funny moments.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204874</id>
	<title>Re:No... WoW vs pretend warfair with sticks for gu</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259007540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I play airsoft, which I often refer to as 'FPS', much to the annoyance of all the other geeks<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Sorry, but it is!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I play airsoft , which I often refer to as 'FPS ' , much to the annoyance of all the other geeks : ) Sorry , but it is !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I play airsoft, which I often refer to as 'FPS', much to the annoyance of all the other geeks :)Sorry, but it is!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204762</id>
	<title>You don't have to go that far back...</title>
	<author>webmistressrachel</author>
	<datestamp>1259006880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here are some more recent tech most of you have spurned for all the wrong reasons but which I'll never give up and you can pry from my cold dead hands (but you won't want to!!)</p><p>We have: Washed out LCD monitors, rubbish refresh rates, pale colours, all reds are orange.<br>I Have: My 21" newsroom Trinitrons, three of, for a combined resolution of 4800x1200 at 85Hz. Perfect colours, wide viewing angles, annoying bezels. Windows 7 really likes them...</p><p>We have: Computer speakers, tiny badly-designed amplifiers, built-in speakers on TV's, plastic "hifi" speakers with metal cones, etc. Plenty of bass, fair enough, but just whisper "dynamic range" and "signal-to-noise ratio" to these people and you might just cause a flamewar.<br>I Have: Wharfedale Modus Twos and a Rotel RSX-03 amplifier with 6 discrete channels (RSX-03), FLAC, Cds. And yes, decent speaker wire (4mm) I found! I'm not a hifi snob, but I know mine sounds better and with wise buying cost less!</p><p>Not all progress is good, only good progress<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here are some more recent tech most of you have spurned for all the wrong reasons but which I 'll never give up and you can pry from my cold dead hands ( but you wo n't want to ! !
) We have : Washed out LCD monitors , rubbish refresh rates , pale colours , all reds are orange.I Have : My 21 " newsroom Trinitrons , three of , for a combined resolution of 4800x1200 at 85Hz .
Perfect colours , wide viewing angles , annoying bezels .
Windows 7 really likes them...We have : Computer speakers , tiny badly-designed amplifiers , built-in speakers on TV 's , plastic " hifi " speakers with metal cones , etc .
Plenty of bass , fair enough , but just whisper " dynamic range " and " signal-to-noise ratio " to these people and you might just cause a flamewar.I Have : Wharfedale Modus Twos and a Rotel RSX-03 amplifier with 6 discrete channels ( RSX-03 ) , FLAC , Cds .
And yes , decent speaker wire ( 4mm ) I found !
I 'm not a hifi snob , but I know mine sounds better and with wise buying cost less ! Not all progress is good , only good progress : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here are some more recent tech most of you have spurned for all the wrong reasons but which I'll never give up and you can pry from my cold dead hands (but you won't want to!!
)We have: Washed out LCD monitors, rubbish refresh rates, pale colours, all reds are orange.I Have: My 21" newsroom Trinitrons, three of, for a combined resolution of 4800x1200 at 85Hz.
Perfect colours, wide viewing angles, annoying bezels.
Windows 7 really likes them...We have: Computer speakers, tiny badly-designed amplifiers, built-in speakers on TV's, plastic "hifi" speakers with metal cones, etc.
Plenty of bass, fair enough, but just whisper "dynamic range" and "signal-to-noise ratio" to these people and you might just cause a flamewar.I Have: Wharfedale Modus Twos and a Rotel RSX-03 amplifier with 6 discrete channels (RSX-03), FLAC, Cds.
And yes, decent speaker wire (4mm) I found!
I'm not a hifi snob, but I know mine sounds better and with wise buying cost less!Not all progress is good, only good progress :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205758</id>
	<title>Re:Probably 1940s peak of USA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258969800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I severely disagree. My grandfather tells stories about him and my grandmother when they were younger in the late 50's early 60's and things seem way easier now. They had one car, it broke down all the time, and the payments nearly killed them. If you want a TV these days, you go out and buy one, which is just going to be an upgrade over the three others in your house- they saved for months to get one and paid for it mostly with side work my grandfather did repairing electronics (you repaired tvs, radios and appliances back then). Dishwashers? washer/dryers? They didn't get those until the 70's. Every purchase was a big deal, they struggled.</p><p>Compare that to these days where every family has TV, cellphones, and every middle class family has a computer and internet access, and enough crap from Walmart to fill a dumpster. Electronics are practically free. We live in a world of cheap crap, and cheap food. I have seen some mexican day laborers that are poor, living in cramped living quarters with few possessions other than the clothes they use for work, but I believe that the poor from the 40's and 50's would find the poor among us today living luxurious lives by their standards.</p><p>And keep in mind, my grandfather was an electrical technician/repairman that later developed into a radar engineer, and was fairly high up in the hierarchy at Grumman when he retired in the late 80's- he wasn't an unskilled laborer. If things seemed so peachy back then, it probably had a lot more to do with the fact that there was less crap needed to keep up with the joneses and people were happier since they had lower expectations- those 800 sq ft Levittown houses on 6000 sq ft plots were palatial to them, today they are considered "starter" houses- in 2007 the average newly built house was 2500 sq ft.</p><p>The only thing that seems much more expensive today in relative terms is housing- and that appears to be mostly due to the latest bubble and the gov'ts current continued efforts to support it. It was an extraordinarily good policy to make the maximum amount you could borrow 3x your salary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I severely disagree .
My grandfather tells stories about him and my grandmother when they were younger in the late 50 's early 60 's and things seem way easier now .
They had one car , it broke down all the time , and the payments nearly killed them .
If you want a TV these days , you go out and buy one , which is just going to be an upgrade over the three others in your house- they saved for months to get one and paid for it mostly with side work my grandfather did repairing electronics ( you repaired tvs , radios and appliances back then ) .
Dishwashers ? washer/dryers ?
They did n't get those until the 70 's .
Every purchase was a big deal , they struggled.Compare that to these days where every family has TV , cellphones , and every middle class family has a computer and internet access , and enough crap from Walmart to fill a dumpster .
Electronics are practically free .
We live in a world of cheap crap , and cheap food .
I have seen some mexican day laborers that are poor , living in cramped living quarters with few possessions other than the clothes they use for work , but I believe that the poor from the 40 's and 50 's would find the poor among us today living luxurious lives by their standards.And keep in mind , my grandfather was an electrical technician/repairman that later developed into a radar engineer , and was fairly high up in the hierarchy at Grumman when he retired in the late 80 's- he was n't an unskilled laborer .
If things seemed so peachy back then , it probably had a lot more to do with the fact that there was less crap needed to keep up with the joneses and people were happier since they had lower expectations- those 800 sq ft Levittown houses on 6000 sq ft plots were palatial to them , today they are considered " starter " houses- in 2007 the average newly built house was 2500 sq ft.The only thing that seems much more expensive today in relative terms is housing- and that appears to be mostly due to the latest bubble and the gov'ts current continued efforts to support it .
It was an extraordinarily good policy to make the maximum amount you could borrow 3x your salary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I severely disagree.
My grandfather tells stories about him and my grandmother when they were younger in the late 50's early 60's and things seem way easier now.
They had one car, it broke down all the time, and the payments nearly killed them.
If you want a TV these days, you go out and buy one, which is just going to be an upgrade over the three others in your house- they saved for months to get one and paid for it mostly with side work my grandfather did repairing electronics (you repaired tvs, radios and appliances back then).
Dishwashers? washer/dryers?
They didn't get those until the 70's.
Every purchase was a big deal, they struggled.Compare that to these days where every family has TV, cellphones, and every middle class family has a computer and internet access, and enough crap from Walmart to fill a dumpster.
Electronics are practically free.
We live in a world of cheap crap, and cheap food.
I have seen some mexican day laborers that are poor, living in cramped living quarters with few possessions other than the clothes they use for work, but I believe that the poor from the 40's and 50's would find the poor among us today living luxurious lives by their standards.And keep in mind, my grandfather was an electrical technician/repairman that later developed into a radar engineer, and was fairly high up in the hierarchy at Grumman when he retired in the late 80's- he wasn't an unskilled laborer.
If things seemed so peachy back then, it probably had a lot more to do with the fact that there was less crap needed to keep up with the joneses and people were happier since they had lower expectations- those 800 sq ft Levittown houses on 6000 sq ft plots were palatial to them, today they are considered "starter" houses- in 2007 the average newly built house was 2500 sq ft.The only thing that seems much more expensive today in relative terms is housing- and that appears to be mostly due to the latest bubble and the gov'ts current continued efforts to support it.
It was an extraordinarily good policy to make the maximum amount you could borrow 3x your salary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205780</id>
	<title>Re:Better comparisons</title>
	<author>Beardo the Bearded</author>
	<datestamp>1258969860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Credit vs. Cash -&gt; depends, I vote Debit Card (best of both worlds)</p></div><p>Be careful -- I used to put everything on debit until my parents' info was stolen from a hancked PIN pad. I switched to credit, and the advantages are:</p><p>1. Reward points (1\% cash back)<br>2. Deferral of all expenses by one month (extra interest in bank account)<br>3. Buffer between "real" money and "public" money. (like a throw-away email address)<br>4. Recovery of assets is faster. (Bank: "Maybe you took a flight to Georgia this afternoon." CC: "Oh, sorry, we'll reverse the charge and send you a new card.")</p><p>There is no downside IF you pay off the balance every month. Okay, you do have to carry around one extra card, but that's it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Credit vs. Cash - &gt; depends , I vote Debit Card ( best of both worlds ) Be careful -- I used to put everything on debit until my parents ' info was stolen from a hancked PIN pad .
I switched to credit , and the advantages are : 1 .
Reward points ( 1 \ % cash back ) 2 .
Deferral of all expenses by one month ( extra interest in bank account ) 3 .
Buffer between " real " money and " public " money .
( like a throw-away email address ) 4 .
Recovery of assets is faster .
( Bank : " Maybe you took a flight to Georgia this afternoon .
" CC : " Oh , sorry , we 'll reverse the charge and send you a new card .
" ) There is no downside IF you pay off the balance every month .
Okay , you do have to carry around one extra card , but that 's it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Credit vs. Cash -&gt; depends, I vote Debit Card (best of both worlds)Be careful -- I used to put everything on debit until my parents' info was stolen from a hancked PIN pad.
I switched to credit, and the advantages are:1.
Reward points (1\% cash back)2.
Deferral of all expenses by one month (extra interest in bank account)3.
Buffer between "real" money and "public" money.
(like a throw-away email address)4.
Recovery of assets is faster.
(Bank: "Maybe you took a flight to Georgia this afternoon.
" CC: "Oh, sorry, we'll reverse the charge and send you a new card.
")There is no downside IF you pay off the balance every month.
Okay, you do have to carry around one extra card, but that's it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208740</id>
	<title>Re:One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>electrons\_are\_brave</author>
	<datestamp>1258983420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We had Walkmans rather than ipods. My clique didn't refer to them as Walkmans because that was sexist language. No I am not joking. The music was all pirated, though, so that hasn't changed at least.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We had Walkmans rather than ipods .
My clique did n't refer to them as Walkmans because that was sexist language .
No I am not joking .
The music was all pirated , though , so that has n't changed at least .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We had Walkmans rather than ipods.
My clique didn't refer to them as Walkmans because that was sexist language.
No I am not joking.
The music was all pirated, though, so that hasn't changed at least.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205874</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208538</id>
	<title>Iphone</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1258982160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm curious why they chose the Iphone? I mean, spot the odd one out - for every other technology, they list either the dominant leader, or if there isn't one, they put the generic name. But for some reason, the Iphone gets chosen, at only a few per cent market share. Why? Or is this just yet another case of jumping on the Apple product placement bandwagon?</p><p>If anything, they should list Nokia, but as no one's dominant in the mobile market (Nokia have "only" 40\%), it's probably better to stick with the perfectly good word we already have for the device they are referring to: a <i>phone</i> (or mobile phone, smartphone, etc, if you prefer).</p><p>To answer the article, no I don't think my Iphone is cool, because I don't have one.</p><p>Although on second thoughts, it's true that only a minority of the population had access to torches on hills, so I guess the comparison is fair.</p><p>Before Apple fans respond saying I'm wrong, please avoid:<br>* Redefining the mobile market to some subset category that includes Iphones but excludes most other phones.<br>* Relying on anecdotes, what your friends have, what gets publicity, instead of hard market data.<br>* Redefining market share to mean something other than market share (e.g., dubious subjective terms like "mind share").<br>Thank you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm curious why they chose the Iphone ?
I mean , spot the odd one out - for every other technology , they list either the dominant leader , or if there is n't one , they put the generic name .
But for some reason , the Iphone gets chosen , at only a few per cent market share .
Why ? Or is this just yet another case of jumping on the Apple product placement bandwagon ? If anything , they should list Nokia , but as no one 's dominant in the mobile market ( Nokia have " only " 40 \ % ) , it 's probably better to stick with the perfectly good word we already have for the device they are referring to : a phone ( or mobile phone , smartphone , etc , if you prefer ) .To answer the article , no I do n't think my Iphone is cool , because I do n't have one.Although on second thoughts , it 's true that only a minority of the population had access to torches on hills , so I guess the comparison is fair.Before Apple fans respond saying I 'm wrong , please avoid : * Redefining the mobile market to some subset category that includes Iphones but excludes most other phones .
* Relying on anecdotes , what your friends have , what gets publicity , instead of hard market data .
* Redefining market share to mean something other than market share ( e.g. , dubious subjective terms like " mind share " ) .Thank you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm curious why they chose the Iphone?
I mean, spot the odd one out - for every other technology, they list either the dominant leader, or if there isn't one, they put the generic name.
But for some reason, the Iphone gets chosen, at only a few per cent market share.
Why? Or is this just yet another case of jumping on the Apple product placement bandwagon?If anything, they should list Nokia, but as no one's dominant in the mobile market (Nokia have "only" 40\%), it's probably better to stick with the perfectly good word we already have for the device they are referring to: a phone (or mobile phone, smartphone, etc, if you prefer).To answer the article, no I don't think my Iphone is cool, because I don't have one.Although on second thoughts, it's true that only a minority of the population had access to torches on hills, so I guess the comparison is fair.Before Apple fans respond saying I'm wrong, please avoid:* Redefining the mobile market to some subset category that includes Iphones but excludes most other phones.
* Relying on anecdotes, what your friends have, what gets publicity, instead of hard market data.
* Redefining market share to mean something other than market share (e.g., dubious subjective terms like "mind share").Thank you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205748</id>
	<title>Re:not always quite so</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258969740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or being bitten by a snake while fording the river and trying to shoot more buffalo so that you could spend all your money on wagon resupplies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or being bitten by a snake while fording the river and trying to shoot more buffalo so that you could spend all your money on wagon resupplies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or being bitten by a snake while fording the river and trying to shoot more buffalo so that you could spend all your money on wagon resupplies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204952</id>
	<title>Re:Probably 1940s peak of USA</title>
	<author>Sponge Bath</author>
	<datestamp>1259008080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>We're just shoved into boxes with sex and drugs...</i></p><p>Wait... what? I was with you until this part.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're just shoved into boxes with sex and drugs...Wait... what ? I was with you until this part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> We're just shoved into boxes with sex and drugs...Wait... what? I was with you until this part.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204742</id>
	<title>Re:No... WoW vs pretend warfair with sticks for gu</title>
	<author>idontgno</author>
	<datestamp>1259006760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Sorry. We geeks playing World of Warcraft would not be engaged in killing each other if not for the game.</i> </p><p>True. I wonder how many closet murderers indulge their taste for mayhem in a virtual world but avoid it IRL simply because it's permitted in one place and punished in the other. Or, to put it more plainly, how many would do it IRL if they were guaranteed they could get away with it.</p><p>"I once stabbed a man to watch him die. And also for 8 honor points."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry .
We geeks playing World of Warcraft would not be engaged in killing each other if not for the game .
True. I wonder how many closet murderers indulge their taste for mayhem in a virtual world but avoid it IRL simply because it 's permitted in one place and punished in the other .
Or , to put it more plainly , how many would do it IRL if they were guaranteed they could get away with it .
" I once stabbed a man to watch him die .
And also for 8 honor points .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Sorry.
We geeks playing World of Warcraft would not be engaged in killing each other if not for the game.
True. I wonder how many closet murderers indulge their taste for mayhem in a virtual world but avoid it IRL simply because it's permitted in one place and punished in the other.
Or, to put it more plainly, how many would do it IRL if they were guaranteed they could get away with it.
"I once stabbed a man to watch him die.
And also for 8 honor points.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205674</id>
	<title>Re:not always quite so</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258969380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LOLOLOLOLOL  Awe man - this brought back memories of when I worked in LearningSmith.  I actually had to try to sell Oregon Trail to folks.  Too funny - thanks for the laugh!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LOLOLOLOLOL Awe man - this brought back memories of when I worked in LearningSmith .
I actually had to try to sell Oregon Trail to folks .
Too funny - thanks for the laugh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOLOLOLOLOL  Awe man - this brought back memories of when I worked in LearningSmith.
I actually had to try to sell Oregon Trail to folks.
Too funny - thanks for the laugh!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204670</id>
	<title>Jesus Christ! My router or ATT</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259006280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fuck'n! You wouldn't believe this! I typed "slashdot.org" in my address bar and Digg popped up looking like slashdot! Same lamo "articles". What next? The top 10 reasons why my toilet paper sucks?<p>Go ahead, bury me, there will be plenty to digg me.</p><p>Fuck the RIAA! <i>This IS Digg, right?</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck'n !
You would n't believe this !
I typed " slashdot.org " in my address bar and Digg popped up looking like slashdot !
Same lamo " articles " .
What next ?
The top 10 reasons why my toilet paper sucks ? Go ahead , bury me , there will be plenty to digg me.Fuck the RIAA !
This IS Digg , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck'n!
You wouldn't believe this!
I typed "slashdot.org" in my address bar and Digg popped up looking like slashdot!
Same lamo "articles".
What next?
The top 10 reasons why my toilet paper sucks?Go ahead, bury me, there will be plenty to digg me.Fuck the RIAA!
This IS Digg, right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205874</id>
	<title>Re:One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1258970340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>During lunch at school you would say "Meet at the pool around 4:00 and we'll figure something out."</p></div><p>OK, speaking as an old-timer of 48, I have to second this. That was how we did did "meet-ups" back in the day. Of course, it was "the cracker barrel at the general store", not "the pool".  And what we usually settled on doing was some variation of rolling the an old barrel hoop down the dirt road with a stick. But that was mainly to take our minds of the folksy banjo music that accompanied us wherever we went.</p><p>Still, we were happy although we didn't have much. Folks weren't so jaded back then.  People had solid *values*, like patriotism, racism and exflunctication.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>During lunch at school you would say " Meet at the pool around 4 : 00 and we 'll figure something out .
" OK , speaking as an old-timer of 48 , I have to second this .
That was how we did did " meet-ups " back in the day .
Of course , it was " the cracker barrel at the general store " , not " the pool " .
And what we usually settled on doing was some variation of rolling the an old barrel hoop down the dirt road with a stick .
But that was mainly to take our minds of the folksy banjo music that accompanied us wherever we went.Still , we were happy although we did n't have much .
Folks were n't so jaded back then .
People had solid * values * , like patriotism , racism and exflunctication .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>During lunch at school you would say "Meet at the pool around 4:00 and we'll figure something out.
"OK, speaking as an old-timer of 48, I have to second this.
That was how we did did "meet-ups" back in the day.
Of course, it was "the cracker barrel at the general store", not "the pool".
And what we usually settled on doing was some variation of rolling the an old barrel hoop down the dirt road with a stick.
But that was mainly to take our minds of the folksy banjo music that accompanied us wherever we went.Still, we were happy although we didn't have much.
Folks weren't so jaded back then.
People had solid *values*, like patriotism, racism and exflunctication.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205038</id>
	<title>man'kind's gadgets vs. creators' newclear power</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259008620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no contest. the lights are coming up all over now. talk about history? it was ALWAYS supposed to be how it is about to be. it's all in the manuals.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no contest .
the lights are coming up all over now .
talk about history ?
it was ALWAYS supposed to be how it is about to be .
it 's all in the manuals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no contest.
the lights are coming up all over now.
talk about history?
it was ALWAYS supposed to be how it is about to be.
it's all in the manuals.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205208</id>
	<title>Re:No... WoW vs pretend warfair with sticks for gu</title>
	<author>ground.zero.612</author>
	<datestamp>1259009580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>Sorry. We geeks playing World of Warcraft would not be engaged in killing each other if not for the game.</i> </p><p>True. I wonder how many closet murderers indulge their taste for mayhem in a virtual world but avoid it IRL simply because it's permitted in one place and punished in the other. Or, to put it more plainly, how many would do it IRL if they were guaranteed they could get away with it.</p><p>"I once stabbed a man to watch him die. And also for 8 honor points."</p></div><p>Killing a mod point for this one (which will, in turn, kill some karma as well TEE-HEE!).</p><p>Homosexuals are guaranteed to get away with it in many parts of the USA now. Destroying the taboo certainly has caused an assplosion of gayness. At least on TV, Radio, Movies, Music, and publicly in metropolitan areas of the nation.</p><p>

I would hope that the increased number of rapes, murders, and incest would not come as a surprise should one group of them become vocal enough to destroy those taboos. If so, perhaps I've put too much faith in my fellow heterosexual, non-rapist, non-murderer, non-incest committing mankind.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry .
We geeks playing World of Warcraft would not be engaged in killing each other if not for the game .
True. I wonder how many closet murderers indulge their taste for mayhem in a virtual world but avoid it IRL simply because it 's permitted in one place and punished in the other .
Or , to put it more plainly , how many would do it IRL if they were guaranteed they could get away with it .
" I once stabbed a man to watch him die .
And also for 8 honor points .
" Killing a mod point for this one ( which will , in turn , kill some karma as well TEE-HEE !
) .Homosexuals are guaranteed to get away with it in many parts of the USA now .
Destroying the taboo certainly has caused an assplosion of gayness .
At least on TV , Radio , Movies , Music , and publicly in metropolitan areas of the nation .
I would hope that the increased number of rapes , murders , and incest would not come as a surprise should one group of them become vocal enough to destroy those taboos .
If so , perhaps I 've put too much faith in my fellow heterosexual , non-rapist , non-murderer , non-incest committing mankind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Sorry.
We geeks playing World of Warcraft would not be engaged in killing each other if not for the game.
True. I wonder how many closet murderers indulge their taste for mayhem in a virtual world but avoid it IRL simply because it's permitted in one place and punished in the other.
Or, to put it more plainly, how many would do it IRL if they were guaranteed they could get away with it.
"I once stabbed a man to watch him die.
And also for 8 honor points.
"Killing a mod point for this one (which will, in turn, kill some karma as well TEE-HEE!
).Homosexuals are guaranteed to get away with it in many parts of the USA now.
Destroying the taboo certainly has caused an assplosion of gayness.
At least on TV, Radio, Movies, Music, and publicly in metropolitan areas of the nation.
I would hope that the increased number of rapes, murders, and incest would not come as a surprise should one group of them become vocal enough to destroy those taboos.
If so, perhaps I've put too much faith in my fellow heterosexual, non-rapist, non-murderer, non-incest committing mankind.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205504</id>
	<title>Re:WoW does not equal War</title>
	<author>Neofluffybunny</author>
	<datestamp>1258968420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I play a Preist, you insensitive Clod! All my armor is rags!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I play a Preist , you insensitive Clod !
All my armor is rags !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I play a Preist, you insensitive Clod!
All my armor is rags!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204922</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205654</id>
	<title>Re:Poisoning people with cancer...</title>
	<author>pwfffff</author>
	<datestamp>1258969260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And the best way to get around was by putting yourself in a large metal box propelled at well over double the max speed of any land mammal by a series of small explosions created by igniting the leftovers of million-year-old dinosaur guts.</p><p>Cars are crazy shit, man.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the best way to get around was by putting yourself in a large metal box propelled at well over double the max speed of any land mammal by a series of small explosions created by igniting the leftovers of million-year-old dinosaur guts.Cars are crazy shit , man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the best way to get around was by putting yourself in a large metal box propelled at well over double the max speed of any land mammal by a series of small explosions created by igniting the leftovers of million-year-old dinosaur guts.Cars are crazy shit, man.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208652</id>
	<title>Re:Better comparisons</title>
	<author>electrons\_are\_brave</author>
	<datestamp>1258982880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Digital cameras versus film.<p>

Boy, people take too many photos these days. Back then it cost too much to develop them - photos were for special occasions, when you were dressed up and looking your best. And if Cousin Tommy pulled a face or Grandma blinked then we just beat them till they behaved better next time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Digital cameras versus film .
Boy , people take too many photos these days .
Back then it cost too much to develop them - photos were for special occasions , when you were dressed up and looking your best .
And if Cousin Tommy pulled a face or Grandma blinked then we just beat them till they behaved better next time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Digital cameras versus film.
Boy, people take too many photos these days.
Back then it cost too much to develop them - photos were for special occasions, when you were dressed up and looking your best.
And if Cousin Tommy pulled a face or Grandma blinked then we just beat them till they behaved better next time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205014</id>
	<title>Seriously...</title>
	<author>destroyer661</author>
	<datestamp>1259008440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I want to know who in their right mind would pay someone to write this? I could make a small shell script to write an article exactly like that. Type in your two topics, multiplied by however many 'battles' you want, and voila, pick the second topic every time as the winner and rejoice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to know who in their right mind would pay someone to write this ?
I could make a small shell script to write an article exactly like that .
Type in your two topics , multiplied by however many 'battles ' you want , and voila , pick the second topic every time as the winner and rejoice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to know who in their right mind would pay someone to write this?
I could make a small shell script to write an article exactly like that.
Type in your two topics, multiplied by however many 'battles' you want, and voila, pick the second topic every time as the winner and rejoice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204732</id>
	<title>Bad article is....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259006640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is bad. Was clearly made by some anti-tech fag who hates modern society and hopes to revert to a simpler time.</p><p>PS. I did not laugh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is bad .
Was clearly made by some anti-tech fag who hates modern society and hopes to revert to a simpler time.PS .
I did not laugh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is bad.
Was clearly made by some anti-tech fag who hates modern society and hopes to revert to a simpler time.PS.
I did not laugh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206320</id>
	<title>Re:One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1258972260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, there's a hint: All cell phones I know have in common a very useful functionality: You can turn them off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , there 's a hint : All cell phones I know have in common a very useful functionality : You can turn them off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, there's a hint: All cell phones I know have in common a very useful functionality: You can turn them off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30221804</id>
	<title>Re:not always quite so</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259074260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yep, now just about anyone in the USA can have a car with 100+ horsepower -- which is pretty amazing, owning 100+ horses was only for the super rich in ancient times.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , now just about anyone in the USA can have a car with 100 + horsepower -- which is pretty amazing , owning 100 + horses was only for the super rich in ancient times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, now just about anyone in the USA can have a car with 100+ horsepower -- which is pretty amazing, owning 100+ horses was only for the super rich in ancient times.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30229432</id>
	<title>Re:I have to wonder though</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257193740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Soooo, that entire tirade was about... Outlook email notification? It really bothered you that much? You were a consultant. Paid to do their bidding. Reading their email was their bidding. Do it. Get paid. Shut the fuck up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Soooo , that entire tirade was about... Outlook email notification ?
It really bothered you that much ?
You were a consultant .
Paid to do their bidding .
Reading their email was their bidding .
Do it .
Get paid .
Shut the fuck up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Soooo, that entire tirade was about... Outlook email notification?
It really bothered you that much?
You were a consultant.
Paid to do their bidding.
Reading their email was their bidding.
Do it.
Get paid.
Shut the fuck up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208536</id>
	<title>Re:Probably 1940s peak of USA</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1258982160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The writing is worse, reporting is worse, the arts are terrible and people actually build less and make less."</p><p>Cry me a fucking river. Being "poor" in the 1940s meant being a fucking sharecropper (there where plenty of White ones) not getting obese on food stamps.</p><p>The standard of living sucked by comparison with the present. The arts only matter to the wealthy or to snobs, now as then. Writing and reporting were frequently dishonest, although more dignified. Corruption was rife, racism was normal, medical care was wretched, life expectancy was lower. Now it is common for people to have multiple cars, many appliances, and far more useful stuff in general than in the '40s/'50s. Failure to enjoy that is a personal problem easily solved by removing head from arse.</p><p>"We're just shoved into boxes with sex and drugs but can't really ever get out of it, lest we bump into someone else's box."</p><p>Nobody is "shoved" into sex and drugs. They are a choice, and enjoyed properly they are Great Fun.<br>As for not bumping into someone else's box, what does that mean? If where you live is crowded, take advantage of our very mobile society and GTFO as I did. The US is vast and choiceful.</p><p>"Certainly this is true in Detroit..."</p><p>Detroit is a city we don't need any more. It was built on an industrial model that was going obsolete in the 1950s.<br>The smart people bailed early for the comfortable suburbs where they could have personal space.</p><p>Americans were socially conditioned to believe that cities should be clung to and preserved, but reality is that cities exist for a set of reasons and when those go away the city is pointless. Some obsolete cities are attempting controlled shrinkage, such as Youngstown, Ohio, but that doesn't work everywhere. Detroit has people clinging to the wreckage, but because it is better to build new factories than attempt to re-use ancient infrastructure business won't come back. There is no great consequence to abandoning obsolete Rust Belt cities. In a few years the memories they evoke will die with the people who hold them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The writing is worse , reporting is worse , the arts are terrible and people actually build less and make less .
" Cry me a fucking river .
Being " poor " in the 1940s meant being a fucking sharecropper ( there where plenty of White ones ) not getting obese on food stamps.The standard of living sucked by comparison with the present .
The arts only matter to the wealthy or to snobs , now as then .
Writing and reporting were frequently dishonest , although more dignified .
Corruption was rife , racism was normal , medical care was wretched , life expectancy was lower .
Now it is common for people to have multiple cars , many appliances , and far more useful stuff in general than in the '40s/'50s .
Failure to enjoy that is a personal problem easily solved by removing head from arse .
" We 're just shoved into boxes with sex and drugs but ca n't really ever get out of it , lest we bump into someone else 's box .
" Nobody is " shoved " into sex and drugs .
They are a choice , and enjoyed properly they are Great Fun.As for not bumping into someone else 's box , what does that mean ?
If where you live is crowded , take advantage of our very mobile society and GTFO as I did .
The US is vast and choiceful .
" Certainly this is true in Detroit... " Detroit is a city we do n't need any more .
It was built on an industrial model that was going obsolete in the 1950s.The smart people bailed early for the comfortable suburbs where they could have personal space.Americans were socially conditioned to believe that cities should be clung to and preserved , but reality is that cities exist for a set of reasons and when those go away the city is pointless .
Some obsolete cities are attempting controlled shrinkage , such as Youngstown , Ohio , but that does n't work everywhere .
Detroit has people clinging to the wreckage , but because it is better to build new factories than attempt to re-use ancient infrastructure business wo n't come back .
There is no great consequence to abandoning obsolete Rust Belt cities .
In a few years the memories they evoke will die with the people who hold them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The writing is worse, reporting is worse, the arts are terrible and people actually build less and make less.
"Cry me a fucking river.
Being "poor" in the 1940s meant being a fucking sharecropper (there where plenty of White ones) not getting obese on food stamps.The standard of living sucked by comparison with the present.
The arts only matter to the wealthy or to snobs, now as then.
Writing and reporting were frequently dishonest, although more dignified.
Corruption was rife, racism was normal, medical care was wretched, life expectancy was lower.
Now it is common for people to have multiple cars, many appliances, and far more useful stuff in general than in the '40s/'50s.
Failure to enjoy that is a personal problem easily solved by removing head from arse.
"We're just shoved into boxes with sex and drugs but can't really ever get out of it, lest we bump into someone else's box.
"Nobody is "shoved" into sex and drugs.
They are a choice, and enjoyed properly they are Great Fun.As for not bumping into someone else's box, what does that mean?
If where you live is crowded, take advantage of our very mobile society and GTFO as I did.
The US is vast and choiceful.
"Certainly this is true in Detroit..."Detroit is a city we don't need any more.
It was built on an industrial model that was going obsolete in the 1950s.The smart people bailed early for the comfortable suburbs where they could have personal space.Americans were socially conditioned to believe that cities should be clung to and preserved, but reality is that cities exist for a set of reasons and when those go away the city is pointless.
Some obsolete cities are attempting controlled shrinkage, such as Youngstown, Ohio, but that doesn't work everywhere.
Detroit has people clinging to the wreckage, but because it is better to build new factories than attempt to re-use ancient infrastructure business won't come back.
There is no great consequence to abandoning obsolete Rust Belt cities.
In a few years the memories they evoke will die with the people who hold them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208572</id>
	<title>Re:One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>VisceralLogic</author>
	<datestamp>1258982340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... And what we usually settled on doing was some variation of rolling the an old barrel hoop down the dirt road with a stick...</p></div><p>You guys had sticks?!  Why, when I was a lad, we had to roll barrel hoops down dirt roads with our hands!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... And what we usually settled on doing was some variation of rolling the an old barrel hoop down the dirt road with a stick...You guys had sticks ? !
Why , when I was a lad , we had to roll barrel hoops down dirt roads with our hands !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... And what we usually settled on doing was some variation of rolling the an old barrel hoop down the dirt road with a stick...You guys had sticks?!
Why, when I was a lad, we had to roll barrel hoops down dirt roads with our hands!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205874</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204922</id>
	<title>WoW does not equal War</title>
	<author>Nidi62</author>
	<datestamp>1259007900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sorry, but just because WoW has "war" in the title does not mean it can be equated to actual war.  In real war, you dont run around fighting monsters with other people, buying and selling stuff so you can make that shiny new armor or buy the coolest new mount.  If it were like real Middle Aged warfare, you would be running around with a small axe and whatever implement you had on your farm that could do the most damage.  You're also probably wearing whatever rags you happened to be wearing at the time, much less plate or mail armor.  You have people sitting at home yelling at each other over vent, as compared to people who have either trained for it their wholes lives, or were forced into battle by a lord who just wants more land, so he can get more tax money, so he can live even nicer.  Not to mention the fact that the only thing close to someone spewing fireballs is an archer with an arrow covered with pitch and ignited.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry , but just because WoW has " war " in the title does not mean it can be equated to actual war .
In real war , you dont run around fighting monsters with other people , buying and selling stuff so you can make that shiny new armor or buy the coolest new mount .
If it were like real Middle Aged warfare , you would be running around with a small axe and whatever implement you had on your farm that could do the most damage .
You 're also probably wearing whatever rags you happened to be wearing at the time , much less plate or mail armor .
You have people sitting at home yelling at each other over vent , as compared to people who have either trained for it their wholes lives , or were forced into battle by a lord who just wants more land , so he can get more tax money , so he can live even nicer .
Not to mention the fact that the only thing close to someone spewing fireballs is an archer with an arrow covered with pitch and ignited .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry, but just because WoW has "war" in the title does not mean it can be equated to actual war.
In real war, you dont run around fighting monsters with other people, buying and selling stuff so you can make that shiny new armor or buy the coolest new mount.
If it were like real Middle Aged warfare, you would be running around with a small axe and whatever implement you had on your farm that could do the most damage.
You're also probably wearing whatever rags you happened to be wearing at the time, much less plate or mail armor.
You have people sitting at home yelling at each other over vent, as compared to people who have either trained for it their wholes lives, or were forced into battle by a lord who just wants more land, so he can get more tax money, so he can live even nicer.
Not to mention the fact that the only thing close to someone spewing fireballs is an archer with an arrow covered with pitch and ignited.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205050</id>
	<title>Re:Better comparisons</title>
	<author>petes\_PoV</author>
	<datestamp>1259008680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>We have the RIAA, they had religious persecution (I was going to say "The Spanish Inquisition", but you'd expect that)</htmltext>
<tokenext>We have the RIAA , they had religious persecution ( I was going to say " The Spanish Inquisition " , but you 'd expect that )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have the RIAA, they had religious persecution (I was going to say "The Spanish Inquisition", but you'd expect that)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207752</id>
	<title>Way before Microsoft Powerpoint</title>
	<author>Orion Blastar</author>
	<datestamp>1258978020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and other presentation software we had H. Ross Perot and his charts and graphs. Oh how people laughed at his charts and graphs, and today they have their own charts and graphs in Powerpoint and other presentation software.</p><p>"That giant sucking sound you are going to hear is jobs going out of this nation due to the foreign trade bills passing." -H. Ross Perot</p><p>"This is the real reason why nothing ever gets done and the economy never gets fixed. Gridlock in Congress and the White House. Gridlock, gridlock, period period exclamation point!" -Vice Admiral James Stockdale</p><p>Ironically people dismissed them as wrong, but they turned out to be right in the future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and other presentation software we had H. Ross Perot and his charts and graphs .
Oh how people laughed at his charts and graphs , and today they have their own charts and graphs in Powerpoint and other presentation software .
" That giant sucking sound you are going to hear is jobs going out of this nation due to the foreign trade bills passing .
" -H. Ross Perot " This is the real reason why nothing ever gets done and the economy never gets fixed .
Gridlock in Congress and the White House .
Gridlock , gridlock , period period exclamation point !
" -Vice Admiral James StockdaleIronically people dismissed them as wrong , but they turned out to be right in the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and other presentation software we had H. Ross Perot and his charts and graphs.
Oh how people laughed at his charts and graphs, and today they have their own charts and graphs in Powerpoint and other presentation software.
"That giant sucking sound you are going to hear is jobs going out of this nation due to the foreign trade bills passing.
" -H. Ross Perot"This is the real reason why nothing ever gets done and the economy never gets fixed.
Gridlock in Congress and the White House.
Gridlock, gridlock, period period exclamation point!
" -Vice Admiral James StockdaleIronically people dismissed them as wrong, but they turned out to be right in the future.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30219410</id>
	<title>Re:Better comparisons</title>
	<author>Sandbags</author>
	<datestamp>1259060460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1) i get reward points.  About $100 return for every 40K run through the card, but since I run virtually every payemnt I make through it (including 2 mortgages), that adds up quick.</p><p>2) 1 month savings interest on the $2-3K you might roll through in routine spending defered 25 days is not enough to bother with.</p><p>3) can't argue that one</p><p>4) I've disputed numerous debit card charges (mostly double charging, but someone did get my card number at one point and make a few internet purchases).  Money was back in my account in hours.  Since the card has a max purchase per 24 hours with the exception of pre-approval for purchases rung up by my mortgage company (or my own call-in authorizations) it's pretty hard to cause my bank account damage, and any damage would be reversed same day anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) i get reward points .
About $ 100 return for every 40K run through the card , but since I run virtually every payemnt I make through it ( including 2 mortgages ) , that adds up quick.2 ) 1 month savings interest on the $ 2-3K you might roll through in routine spending defered 25 days is not enough to bother with.3 ) ca n't argue that one4 ) I 've disputed numerous debit card charges ( mostly double charging , but someone did get my card number at one point and make a few internet purchases ) .
Money was back in my account in hours .
Since the card has a max purchase per 24 hours with the exception of pre-approval for purchases rung up by my mortgage company ( or my own call-in authorizations ) it 's pretty hard to cause my bank account damage , and any damage would be reversed same day anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) i get reward points.
About $100 return for every 40K run through the card, but since I run virtually every payemnt I make through it (including 2 mortgages), that adds up quick.2) 1 month savings interest on the $2-3K you might roll through in routine spending defered 25 days is not enough to bother with.3) can't argue that one4) I've disputed numerous debit card charges (mostly double charging, but someone did get my card number at one point and make a few internet purchases).
Money was back in my account in hours.
Since the card has a max purchase per 24 hours with the exception of pre-approval for purchases rung up by my mortgage company (or my own call-in authorizations) it's pretty hard to cause my bank account damage, and any damage would be reversed same day anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205606</id>
	<title>Re:Bad article is....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258968960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>can someone with points mod this troll?  we need to start moding to promote valid discussion rather than TLDR style responses.
<br> <br>
I don't disagree that the article wasn't very good, but this response offers nothing to the conversation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>can someone with points mod this troll ?
we need to start moding to promote valid discussion rather than TLDR style responses .
I do n't disagree that the article was n't very good , but this response offers nothing to the conversation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>can someone with points mod this troll?
we need to start moding to promote valid discussion rather than TLDR style responses.
I don't disagree that the article wasn't very good, but this response offers nothing to the conversation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204732</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205288</id>
	<title>nostalgia</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1258966980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>Telegraph vs internet:</b> If you wanted to, you could use VOIP to send the right audio dots and dashes in morse code only this time there's nothing stopping you.  The major draw for the author seems to be the scarcity of such communication back in the time period when telegraphs were the big thing.<br>
&nbsp; <b>Twitter vs gossip:</b> gossip isn't dead.  There's no evidence that Twitter destroyed gossip, it just went online.  A far more efficient means of spreading rumors.<br>
&nbsp; <b>Facebook vs Dinner party:</b> Same as above.  The author seems to pine for a time when the world was very disconnected.<br>
&nbsp; <b>World of Warcraft vs Actual war craft:</b> Iraq?  War isn't anything to be pinning for.<br>Swine flu mass-panic vs The plague: not a very good comparison.  Try AIDS and the plague.<br>
&nbsp; <b>Iphone vs fire on a hill:</b> Same scarcity makes it cool argument.<br>
&nbsp; <b>Viruses vs the Trojan horse:</b> not really a fair comparison.  There's tons of military strategies that put that horse to shame.<br>
&nbsp; <b>MP3s vs Tribal chants:</b> We still have those.  Heck, my friends and I went to Denver just to see a few.<br>
&nbsp; <b>Post-Enlightenment scientific rigour vs Superstition and quack doctors:</b> Yeah that living to the old age of 30 sounds great.  Get me a piece of that action...  We've still got voodoo nonsense and you're free to go get "treated" by one if you wish.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Telegraph vs internet : If you wanted to , you could use VOIP to send the right audio dots and dashes in morse code only this time there 's nothing stopping you .
The major draw for the author seems to be the scarcity of such communication back in the time period when telegraphs were the big thing .
  Twitter vs gossip : gossip is n't dead .
There 's no evidence that Twitter destroyed gossip , it just went online .
A far more efficient means of spreading rumors .
  Facebook vs Dinner party : Same as above .
The author seems to pine for a time when the world was very disconnected .
  World of Warcraft vs Actual war craft : Iraq ?
War is n't anything to be pinning for.Swine flu mass-panic vs The plague : not a very good comparison .
Try AIDS and the plague .
  Iphone vs fire on a hill : Same scarcity makes it cool argument .
  Viruses vs the Trojan horse : not really a fair comparison .
There 's tons of military strategies that put that horse to shame .
  MP3s vs Tribal chants : We still have those .
Heck , my friends and I went to Denver just to see a few .
  Post-Enlightenment scientific rigour vs Superstition and quack doctors : Yeah that living to the old age of 30 sounds great .
Get me a piece of that action... We 've still got voodoo nonsense and you 're free to go get " treated " by one if you wish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Telegraph vs internet: If you wanted to, you could use VOIP to send the right audio dots and dashes in morse code only this time there's nothing stopping you.
The major draw for the author seems to be the scarcity of such communication back in the time period when telegraphs were the big thing.
  Twitter vs gossip: gossip isn't dead.
There's no evidence that Twitter destroyed gossip, it just went online.
A far more efficient means of spreading rumors.
  Facebook vs Dinner party: Same as above.
The author seems to pine for a time when the world was very disconnected.
  World of Warcraft vs Actual war craft: Iraq?
War isn't anything to be pinning for.Swine flu mass-panic vs The plague: not a very good comparison.
Try AIDS and the plague.
  Iphone vs fire on a hill: Same scarcity makes it cool argument.
  Viruses vs the Trojan horse: not really a fair comparison.
There's tons of military strategies that put that horse to shame.
  MP3s vs Tribal chants: We still have those.
Heck, my friends and I went to Denver just to see a few.
  Post-Enlightenment scientific rigour vs Superstition and quack doctors: Yeah that living to the old age of 30 sounds great.
Get me a piece of that action...  We've still got voodoo nonsense and you're free to go get "treated" by one if you wish.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810</id>
	<title>One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259007180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I miss the days before cell phones. Don't get me wrong, cell phones are convenient and allow me to stalk any number of girls that I like, but still..
<br> <br>
I remember before cell phones became mainstream, if you wanted to spend time with your friends, you had to tell them where to meet you and when and they had to be there or else you just wouldn't catch up. It didn't matter if you had anything planned or not. There was much less of the, "Well, I might come out, what did you have in mind?" cruft. During lunch at school you would say, "Meet at the pool around 4:00 and we'll figure something out." Then, the evening was yours for adventure or mischief or what have you. Not always having a plan was half the fun. It meant you would all get together and just start talking or walking or going somewhere seeking something to do until someone had a brilliant...or at least intriguing...idea.
<br> <br>
I remember how, for the weekend, you and all your friends would be sure to meet Friday night somewhere then spend the whole weekend sleeping on each others' floors and couches because if anyone skipped out you wouldn't be able to find them for the rest of the weekend. I remember girls writing their numbers on my hand in pink gel ink and walking around, intentionally holding my hand turned just out slightly so as to subversively brag about my score. I remember setting up dates and saying, "I'll pick you up at..." and not having the crutch of cell phones to be able to work out the details when the time came.
<br> <br>
Yep part of me misses those days. I am only 23 and I feel old writing about that kind of thing....the worst part is I don't even have a lawn yet....</htmltext>
<tokenext>I miss the days before cell phones .
Do n't get me wrong , cell phones are convenient and allow me to stalk any number of girls that I like , but still. . I remember before cell phones became mainstream , if you wanted to spend time with your friends , you had to tell them where to meet you and when and they had to be there or else you just would n't catch up .
It did n't matter if you had anything planned or not .
There was much less of the , " Well , I might come out , what did you have in mind ?
" cruft .
During lunch at school you would say , " Meet at the pool around 4 : 00 and we 'll figure something out .
" Then , the evening was yours for adventure or mischief or what have you .
Not always having a plan was half the fun .
It meant you would all get together and just start talking or walking or going somewhere seeking something to do until someone had a brilliant...or at least intriguing...idea .
I remember how , for the weekend , you and all your friends would be sure to meet Friday night somewhere then spend the whole weekend sleeping on each others ' floors and couches because if anyone skipped out you would n't be able to find them for the rest of the weekend .
I remember girls writing their numbers on my hand in pink gel ink and walking around , intentionally holding my hand turned just out slightly so as to subversively brag about my score .
I remember setting up dates and saying , " I 'll pick you up at... " and not having the crutch of cell phones to be able to work out the details when the time came .
Yep part of me misses those days .
I am only 23 and I feel old writing about that kind of thing....the worst part is I do n't even have a lawn yet... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I miss the days before cell phones.
Don't get me wrong, cell phones are convenient and allow me to stalk any number of girls that I like, but still..
 
I remember before cell phones became mainstream, if you wanted to spend time with your friends, you had to tell them where to meet you and when and they had to be there or else you just wouldn't catch up.
It didn't matter if you had anything planned or not.
There was much less of the, "Well, I might come out, what did you have in mind?
" cruft.
During lunch at school you would say, "Meet at the pool around 4:00 and we'll figure something out.
" Then, the evening was yours for adventure or mischief or what have you.
Not always having a plan was half the fun.
It meant you would all get together and just start talking or walking or going somewhere seeking something to do until someone had a brilliant...or at least intriguing...idea.
I remember how, for the weekend, you and all your friends would be sure to meet Friday night somewhere then spend the whole weekend sleeping on each others' floors and couches because if anyone skipped out you wouldn't be able to find them for the rest of the weekend.
I remember girls writing their numbers on my hand in pink gel ink and walking around, intentionally holding my hand turned just out slightly so as to subversively brag about my score.
I remember setting up dates and saying, "I'll pick you up at..." and not having the crutch of cell phones to be able to work out the details when the time came.
Yep part of me misses those days.
I am only 23 and I feel old writing about that kind of thing....the worst part is I don't even have a lawn yet....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207882</id>
	<title>Re:One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>DrCode</author>
	<datestamp>1258978560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, I'm an old fart (in my 50s!), and I get together with friends all the time using Facebook and text-messaging.  Before these were available, I didn't have any friends.:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , I 'm an old fart ( in my 50s !
) , and I get together with friends all the time using Facebook and text-messaging .
Before these were available , I did n't have any friends .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, I'm an old fart (in my 50s!
), and I get together with friends all the time using Facebook and text-messaging.
Before these were available, I didn't have any friends.
:-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204946</id>
	<title>Twitter v Gossip</title>
	<author>rapturizer</author>
	<datestamp>1259008020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Growing up, the local paper had the social page. This had who visited who and all other pertinent gossip. At least this was edited, used correct grammer, and weeded out all the garbage, thus, was much more interesting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Growing up , the local paper had the social page .
This had who visited who and all other pertinent gossip .
At least this was edited , used correct grammer , and weeded out all the garbage , thus , was much more interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Growing up, the local paper had the social page.
This had who visited who and all other pertinent gossip.
At least this was edited, used correct grammer, and weeded out all the garbage, thus, was much more interesting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30225400</id>
	<title>Re:One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1257174120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>cell phones are convenient and allow me to stalk any number of girls that I like</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
mod parent +5 "I really hope he's being funny".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>cell phones are convenient and allow me to stalk any number of girls that I like mod parent + 5 " I really hope he 's being funny " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>cell phones are convenient and allow me to stalk any number of girls that I like

mod parent +5 "I really hope he's being funny".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206472</id>
	<title>Re:Better comparisons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258972980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We have the RIAA, they had religious persecution (I was going to say "The Spanish Inquisition", but you'd expect that)</p></div><p>I actually didn't expect the Spanish Inquisi-</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We have the RIAA , they had religious persecution ( I was going to say " The Spanish Inquisition " , but you 'd expect that ) I actually did n't expect the Spanish Inquisi-</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have the RIAA, they had religious persecution (I was going to say "The Spanish Inquisition", but you'd expect that)I actually didn't expect the Spanish Inquisi-
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30210212</id>
	<title>Re:So what was the Slashdot of the past . . . ?</title>
	<author>mirix</author>
	<datestamp>1258998540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"in Soviet . . . X, Y's you!"</p></div><p>
Shouldn't that be: <br>"in Soviet . . . Y, X's you" ?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" in Soviet .
. .
X , Y 's you !
" Should n't that be : " in Soviet .
. .
Y , X 's you " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"in Soviet .
. .
X, Y's you!
"
Shouldn't that be: "in Soviet .
. .
Y, X's you" ?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205254</id>
	<title>Re:One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259009940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude - did you live under a rock or something?</p><p>We chatted up girls on the internet and texted friends before you had a double digit age! Scoring a phone number when you're 9 might be cool, but you don't know what to do with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude - did you live under a rock or something ? We chatted up girls on the internet and texted friends before you had a double digit age !
Scoring a phone number when you 're 9 might be cool , but you do n't know what to do with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude - did you live under a rock or something?We chatted up girls on the internet and texted friends before you had a double digit age!
Scoring a phone number when you're 9 might be cool, but you don't know what to do with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208034</id>
	<title>Re:Better comparisons</title>
	<author>clintonmonk</author>
	<datestamp>1258979340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But no one expects the RIAA</htmltext>
<tokenext>But no one expects the RIAA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But no one expects the RIAA</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204574</id>
	<title>not always quite so</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259005680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As you can see, ancient life beats modern life in all respects. Modern life doesn't even come close, scoring a rather embarrassing nought out of ten.</p></div><p>
I would have to disagree. Sure you can pick a few things which outcome is that, but you really have to look at the larger picture.<br>
<br>
As an example, if you think about the medieval era and how you moved around, there we're basically two options:<br>
1) by horse<br>
2) by walking<br>
<br>
This meant that every business had to own a horse and feed it to move around. For a real world example, it also created problems for pizzeria's home delivery, because the horse would eat the pizza.<br>
<br>
But one must also note that some things <i>actually were better on older times</i>. When you ordered a pizza, you knew it would be baked for you with love and it would be delicious to eat. Now someone justs sends me a pizza gift on Facebook. Thanks for the mockery, I say.<br>
<br>
Basically what I am saying is that technology makes things less personal. The same way that salad is shit compared to Pizza Hut's delicious pan pizza, e-card is shit compared to a real postcard because it just doesn't have the same feeling.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As you can see , ancient life beats modern life in all respects .
Modern life does n't even come close , scoring a rather embarrassing nought out of ten .
I would have to disagree .
Sure you can pick a few things which outcome is that , but you really have to look at the larger picture .
As an example , if you think about the medieval era and how you moved around , there we 're basically two options : 1 ) by horse 2 ) by walking This meant that every business had to own a horse and feed it to move around .
For a real world example , it also created problems for pizzeria 's home delivery , because the horse would eat the pizza .
But one must also note that some things actually were better on older times .
When you ordered a pizza , you knew it would be baked for you with love and it would be delicious to eat .
Now someone justs sends me a pizza gift on Facebook .
Thanks for the mockery , I say .
Basically what I am saying is that technology makes things less personal .
The same way that salad is shit compared to Pizza Hut 's delicious pan pizza , e-card is shit compared to a real postcard because it just does n't have the same feeling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As you can see, ancient life beats modern life in all respects.
Modern life doesn't even come close, scoring a rather embarrassing nought out of ten.
I would have to disagree.
Sure you can pick a few things which outcome is that, but you really have to look at the larger picture.
As an example, if you think about the medieval era and how you moved around, there we're basically two options:
1) by horse
2) by walking

This meant that every business had to own a horse and feed it to move around.
For a real world example, it also created problems for pizzeria's home delivery, because the horse would eat the pizza.
But one must also note that some things actually were better on older times.
When you ordered a pizza, you knew it would be baked for you with love and it would be delicious to eat.
Now someone justs sends me a pizza gift on Facebook.
Thanks for the mockery, I say.
Basically what I am saying is that technology makes things less personal.
The same way that salad is shit compared to Pizza Hut's delicious pan pizza, e-card is shit compared to a real postcard because it just doesn't have the same feeling.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205344</id>
	<title>this is a joke?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258967460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so this is actually supposed to be funny?</p><p>miss.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so this is actually supposed to be funny ? miss .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so this is actually supposed to be funny?miss.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205230</id>
	<title>More comps</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1259009760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wooden clubs VS. dating sites</p><p>Temple prostitutes VS. cathouses</p><p>Naked neanderthals VS. endless online porn catering to every whim</p><p>Mammoth hunts across the savannah VS. six pizza places within two miles</p><p>Wooden wagons VS. Audi TT RS</p><p>Fall Of Rome VS. Fall Of USA</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wooden clubs VS. dating sitesTemple prostitutes VS. cathousesNaked neanderthals VS. endless online porn catering to every whimMammoth hunts across the savannah VS. six pizza places within two milesWooden wagons VS. Audi TT RSFall Of Rome VS. Fall Of USA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wooden clubs VS. dating sitesTemple prostitutes VS. cathousesNaked neanderthals VS. endless online porn catering to every whimMammoth hunts across the savannah VS. six pizza places within two milesWooden wagons VS. Audi TT RSFall Of Rome VS. Fall Of USA</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206656</id>
	<title>what about hygiene and sanitation........</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258973700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Both keep you clean and sexy which is a big plus for the modern world!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Both keep you clean and sexy which is a big plus for the modern world !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Both keep you clean and sexy which is a big plus for the modern world!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205170</id>
	<title>your local computer tabloid vs. town crier</title>
	<author>FrankDerKte</author>
	<datestamp>1259009340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nowadays we rely on computer tabloids to deliver utterly useless articles on slow news days.</p><p>In the olden days we got a town crier for this purpose. Every day he delivered the news of the day in a mild and melodic voice, clearly superior to an eye-abusing web page or an unmanageable and oversized paper. Also if they delivered completely bogus and boring news, there was a very direct way to communicate your annoyance. And if the other options fail, you could easily initiate one the very thrilling and entertaining whichhunts, a joy for the whole family.</p><p>So clearly, even the media delivering this unbelievable interesting story had a superior alternative.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nowadays we rely on computer tabloids to deliver utterly useless articles on slow news days.In the olden days we got a town crier for this purpose .
Every day he delivered the news of the day in a mild and melodic voice , clearly superior to an eye-abusing web page or an unmanageable and oversized paper .
Also if they delivered completely bogus and boring news , there was a very direct way to communicate your annoyance .
And if the other options fail , you could easily initiate one the very thrilling and entertaining whichhunts , a joy for the whole family.So clearly , even the media delivering this unbelievable interesting story had a superior alternative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nowadays we rely on computer tabloids to deliver utterly useless articles on slow news days.In the olden days we got a town crier for this purpose.
Every day he delivered the news of the day in a mild and melodic voice, clearly superior to an eye-abusing web page or an unmanageable and oversized paper.
Also if they delivered completely bogus and boring news, there was a very direct way to communicate your annoyance.
And if the other options fail, you could easily initiate one the very thrilling and entertaining whichhunts, a joy for the whole family.So clearly, even the media delivering this unbelievable interesting story had a superior alternative.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206646</id>
	<title>Re:not always quite so</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1258973640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>As an example, if you think about the medieval era and how you moved around, there we're basically two options:1) by horse<br>2) by walking<br>This meant that every business had to own a horse and feed it to move around.</i> </p><p>It meant that you had a tight little monopoly in your own neighborhood<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.</p><p> The handsome brick structure on on our village main street was originally a three story department store that served a population of less than 1000. The alternative, if you wanted to shop for a set of dishes, a mattress or sofa, would be to take a train into Buffalo and pay the freight back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As an example , if you think about the medieval era and how you moved around , there we 're basically two options : 1 ) by horse2 ) by walkingThis meant that every business had to own a horse and feed it to move around .
It meant that you had a tight little monopoly in your own neighborhood .
The handsome brick structure on on our village main street was originally a three story department store that served a population of less than 1000 .
The alternative , if you wanted to shop for a set of dishes , a mattress or sofa , would be to take a train into Buffalo and pay the freight back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an example, if you think about the medieval era and how you moved around, there we're basically two options:1) by horse2) by walkingThis meant that every business had to own a horse and feed it to move around.
It meant that you had a tight little monopoly in your own neighborhood .
The handsome brick structure on on our village main street was originally a three story department store that served a population of less than 1000.
The alternative, if you wanted to shop for a set of dishes, a mattress or sofa, would be to take a train into Buffalo and pay the freight back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205628</id>
	<title>Re:Better comparisons</title>
	<author>mattack2</author>
	<datestamp>1258969140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Credit vs. Cash -&gt; depends, I vote Debit Card (best of both worlds)</p></div></blockquote><p>I vote credit card + autopay at the end of every month -&gt; cheaper (because of cash back(*)), faster, more convenient than cash, plus you get the legally required protections</p><p>(*) Yes, the store has to pay the credit card fees and they end up coming back to us.. but for each individual purchase, the price is generally the same for credit vs cash.  (Stores can give "cash discounts", but even with gasoline, there is almost always a gas station that's lower counting the cash back vs paying cash.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Credit vs. Cash - &gt; depends , I vote Debit Card ( best of both worlds ) I vote credit card + autopay at the end of every month - &gt; cheaper ( because of cash back ( * ) ) , faster , more convenient than cash , plus you get the legally required protections ( * ) Yes , the store has to pay the credit card fees and they end up coming back to us.. but for each individual purchase , the price is generally the same for credit vs cash .
( Stores can give " cash discounts " , but even with gasoline , there is almost always a gas station that 's lower counting the cash back vs paying cash .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Credit vs. Cash -&gt; depends, I vote Debit Card (best of both worlds)I vote credit card + autopay at the end of every month -&gt; cheaper (because of cash back(*)), faster, more convenient than cash, plus you get the legally required protections(*) Yes, the store has to pay the credit card fees and they end up coming back to us.. but for each individual purchase, the price is generally the same for credit vs cash.
(Stores can give "cash discounts", but even with gasoline, there is almost always a gas station that's lower counting the cash back vs paying cash.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205034</id>
	<title>Re:One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>Bazer</author>
	<datestamp>1259008560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yep part of me misses those days. I am only 23 and I feel old writing about that kind of thing....the worst part is I don't even have a lawn yet....</p></div><p>No worries, you can get off mine.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep part of me misses those days .
I am only 23 and I feel old writing about that kind of thing....the worst part is I do n't even have a lawn yet....No worries , you can get off mine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep part of me misses those days.
I am only 23 and I feel old writing about that kind of thing....the worst part is I don't even have a lawn yet....No worries, you can get off mine.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208224</id>
	<title>Re:No... WoW vs pretend warfair with sticks for gu</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258980360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>8? I'd do it for 4.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>8 ?
I 'd do it for 4 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>8?
I'd do it for 4.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205184</id>
	<title>Re:Better comparisons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259009460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Twitter vs. Bathroom Walls</p></div><p>Oddly, there's less crap in the bathroom.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter vs. Bathroom WallsOddly , there 's less crap in the bathroom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twitter vs. Bathroom WallsOddly, there's less crap in the bathroom.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206206</id>
	<title>Re:One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1258971840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to mention the days when being face to face with people meant talking to them rather than watching them take an endless series of phone calls for "just a second" each.</p><p>The people who do that are inevitably befuddled as to why I walked away to do something more useful/interesting (once they notice that is).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention the days when being face to face with people meant talking to them rather than watching them take an endless series of phone calls for " just a second " each.The people who do that are inevitably befuddled as to why I walked away to do something more useful/interesting ( once they notice that is ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention the days when being face to face with people meant talking to them rather than watching them take an endless series of phone calls for "just a second" each.The people who do that are inevitably befuddled as to why I walked away to do something more useful/interesting (once they notice that is).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208282</id>
	<title>Re:nostalgia</title>
	<author>DerKlempner</author>
	<datestamp>1258980660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <b>Post-Enlightenment scientific rigour vs Superstition and quack doctors:</b> Yeah that living to the old age of 30 sounds great.  Get me a piece of that action...  We've still got voodoo nonsense and you're free to go get "treated" by one if you wish.</p></div><p>
How about the simple fact the "article" was written and published for the <i>internet</i>?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Post-Enlightenment scientific rigour vs Superstition and quack doctors : Yeah that living to the old age of 30 sounds great .
Get me a piece of that action... We 've still got voodoo nonsense and you 're free to go get " treated " by one if you wish .
How about the simple fact the " article " was written and published for the internet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Post-Enlightenment scientific rigour vs Superstition and quack doctors: Yeah that living to the old age of 30 sounds great.
Get me a piece of that action...  We've still got voodoo nonsense and you're free to go get "treated" by one if you wish.
How about the simple fact the "article" was written and published for the internet?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30209402</id>
	<title>Worst ... article ... ever</title>
	<author>slackarse</author>
	<datestamp>1258988760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reminds me why I only read the summaries.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me why I only read the summaries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me why I only read the summaries.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204856</id>
	<title>Probably 1940s peak of USA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259007480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You could make the argument that for many people the 1940s-1950s was the present local peak of the USA.  Since that time, due to resource exhaustion, increasing population and foolish trade deals, the standard of living has dropped in relative terms, the opportunities are not what they were, there's more aggravation, less optimism. The writing is worse, reporting is worse, the arts are terrible and people actually build less and make less.  We're just shoved into boxes with sex and drugs but can't really ever get out of it, lest we bump into someone else's box.  Yeah, if you weren't white, it sucked, but I'd bet we'd reach a point where due to declining wealth, where even the disenfranchised black guy in the 1940s had more real wealth than a near future free black guy of today.  Certainly this is true in Detroit...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You could make the argument that for many people the 1940s-1950s was the present local peak of the USA .
Since that time , due to resource exhaustion , increasing population and foolish trade deals , the standard of living has dropped in relative terms , the opportunities are not what they were , there 's more aggravation , less optimism .
The writing is worse , reporting is worse , the arts are terrible and people actually build less and make less .
We 're just shoved into boxes with sex and drugs but ca n't really ever get out of it , lest we bump into someone else 's box .
Yeah , if you were n't white , it sucked , but I 'd bet we 'd reach a point where due to declining wealth , where even the disenfranchised black guy in the 1940s had more real wealth than a near future free black guy of today .
Certainly this is true in Detroit.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could make the argument that for many people the 1940s-1950s was the present local peak of the USA.
Since that time, due to resource exhaustion, increasing population and foolish trade deals, the standard of living has dropped in relative terms, the opportunities are not what they were, there's more aggravation, less optimism.
The writing is worse, reporting is worse, the arts are terrible and people actually build less and make less.
We're just shoved into boxes with sex and drugs but can't really ever get out of it, lest we bump into someone else's box.
Yeah, if you weren't white, it sucked, but I'd bet we'd reach a point where due to declining wealth, where even the disenfranchised black guy in the 1940s had more real wealth than a near future free black guy of today.
Certainly this is true in Detroit...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205010</id>
	<title>Re:Probably 1940s peak of USA</title>
	<author>N!k0N</author>
	<datestamp>1259008440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pullman\_Company" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Pullman Porters</a> [wikipedia.org] -- granted this was probably more the 20s-40s (due to the decline of passenger rail service).  but these guys had better pay than any other African American job available at the time -- also a lot of white* menial jobs
<br> <br>
*note that \_every\_ Pullman Porter was African American.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pullman Porters [ wikipedia.org ] -- granted this was probably more the 20s-40s ( due to the decline of passenger rail service ) .
but these guys had better pay than any other African American job available at the time -- also a lot of white * menial jobs * note that \ _every \ _ Pullman Porter was African American .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pullman Porters [wikipedia.org] -- granted this was probably more the 20s-40s (due to the decline of passenger rail service).
but these guys had better pay than any other African American job available at the time -- also a lot of white* menial jobs
 
*note that \_every\_ Pullman Porter was African American.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30210122</id>
	<title>Re:One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258997520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep part of me misses those days. I am only 23 and I feel old writing about that kind of thing....the worst part is I don't even have a lawn yet....</p><p>You bring up a lot of good points! Thanks for the memory of me reflecting on my own youth, experiencing much of what you described.</p><p>I'm 41, also feel old at times, and I do have a lawn (which is a pain to keep up with sometimes).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep part of me misses those days .
I am only 23 and I feel old writing about that kind of thing....the worst part is I do n't even have a lawn yet....You bring up a lot of good points !
Thanks for the memory of me reflecting on my own youth , experiencing much of what you described.I 'm 41 , also feel old at times , and I do have a lawn ( which is a pain to keep up with sometimes ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep part of me misses those days.
I am only 23 and I feel old writing about that kind of thing....the worst part is I don't even have a lawn yet....You bring up a lot of good points!
Thanks for the memory of me reflecting on my own youth, experiencing much of what you described.I'm 41, also feel old at times, and I do have a lawn (which is a pain to keep up with sometimes).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205218</id>
	<title>Re:One Thing I Miss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259009640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait wait wait...you're 23?</p><p>You must be well behind the cell phone curve if you were hitting on girls and getting phone numbers without a cell phone.  Most people I knew got a cell phone around 1999 or so, when you were 12.  Let's say you start majorly hitting on girls when you're 14/15, which would be like 2002.  And even then you didn't have a cell phone.</p><p>When did you actually get one?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait wait wait...you 're 23 ? You must be well behind the cell phone curve if you were hitting on girls and getting phone numbers without a cell phone .
Most people I knew got a cell phone around 1999 or so , when you were 12 .
Let 's say you start majorly hitting on girls when you 're 14/15 , which would be like 2002 .
And even then you did n't have a cell phone.When did you actually get one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait wait wait...you're 23?You must be well behind the cell phone curve if you were hitting on girls and getting phone numbers without a cell phone.
Most people I knew got a cell phone around 1999 or so, when you were 12.
Let's say you start majorly hitting on girls when you're 14/15, which would be like 2002.
And even then you didn't have a cell phone.When did you actually get one?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30209350</id>
	<title>Re:Better comparisons</title>
	<author>HBoar</author>
	<datestamp>1258988340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>MP3s vs. 1 Man Bands</p></div><p>Given the choice between a crappy mp3 player and my own personal minstrel to follow me around, I know which one I'd pick....  Minstrels are splash proof (even water proof with the optional snorkel kit), shock resistant, voice controllable, and they can even update their own collections.  Plus, it's still easier to find a dead squirrel than an AA battery in many parts of the world.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>MP3s vs. 1 Man BandsGiven the choice between a crappy mp3 player and my own personal minstrel to follow me around , I know which one I 'd pick.... Minstrels are splash proof ( even water proof with the optional snorkel kit ) , shock resistant , voice controllable , and they can even update their own collections .
Plus , it 's still easier to find a dead squirrel than an AA battery in many parts of the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MP3s vs. 1 Man BandsGiven the choice between a crappy mp3 player and my own personal minstrel to follow me around, I know which one I'd pick....  Minstrels are splash proof (even water proof with the optional snorkel kit), shock resistant, voice controllable, and they can even update their own collections.
Plus, it's still easier to find a dead squirrel than an AA battery in many parts of the world.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30210234</id>
	<title>Re:not always quite so</title>
	<author>yuhong</author>
	<datestamp>1258998840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But one must also note that some things actually were better on older times. When you ordered a pizza, you knew it would be baked for you with love and it would be delicious to eat. Now someone justs sends me a pizza gift on Facebook. Thanks for the mockery, I say.</p></div><p>Yep, the rise of industrial food production and processing, which not only was less personal, it also reduced food quality. Weston A Price Foundation has a lot of article on it's problems, like this one:
<a href="http://www.westonaprice.org/modernfood/dirty-secrets.html" title="westonaprice.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.westonaprice.org/modernfood/dirty-secrets.html</a> [westonaprice.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But one must also note that some things actually were better on older times .
When you ordered a pizza , you knew it would be baked for you with love and it would be delicious to eat .
Now someone justs sends me a pizza gift on Facebook .
Thanks for the mockery , I say.Yep , the rise of industrial food production and processing , which not only was less personal , it also reduced food quality .
Weston A Price Foundation has a lot of article on it 's problems , like this one : http : //www.westonaprice.org/modernfood/dirty-secrets.html [ westonaprice.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But one must also note that some things actually were better on older times.
When you ordered a pizza, you knew it would be baked for you with love and it would be delicious to eat.
Now someone justs sends me a pizza gift on Facebook.
Thanks for the mockery, I say.Yep, the rise of industrial food production and processing, which not only was less personal, it also reduced food quality.
Weston A Price Foundation has a lot of article on it's problems, like this one:
http://www.westonaprice.org/modernfood/dirty-secrets.html [westonaprice.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207970</id>
	<title>Re:Better comparisons</title>
	<author>kaizokuace</author>
	<datestamp>1258979040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>no one has mentioned this little comparison:
Toilets vs. The Street.</htmltext>
<tokenext>no one has mentioned this little comparison : Toilets vs. The Street .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no one has mentioned this little comparison:
Toilets vs. The Street.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30214062</id>
	<title>Re:WoW does not equal War</title>
	<author>steelfood</author>
	<datestamp>1259079840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There were a million bad ways to die back then. Now there's only 999,999.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There were a million bad ways to die back then .
Now there 's only 999,999 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There were a million bad ways to die back then.
Now there's only 999,999.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204922</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204958</id>
	<title>Re:Poisoning people with cancer...</title>
	<author>paiute</author>
	<datestamp>1259008140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...which is what much of modern chemotherapy amounts too will be looked back on like we look on bloodletting to keep your humors in order.</p></div><p>Except for the little fact that, as much as chemo sucks and as much as it closely resembles taking just enough arsenic mixed with mercury topped with cyanide to wish you were dead, it is backed up by clinical studies and has been found to work.</p><p>Chemo: sucks but works<br>Leeches: suck and don't work except in special cases as temporary therapy for reattachment of fingers and toes</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...which is what much of modern chemotherapy amounts too will be looked back on like we look on bloodletting to keep your humors in order.Except for the little fact that , as much as chemo sucks and as much as it closely resembles taking just enough arsenic mixed with mercury topped with cyanide to wish you were dead , it is backed up by clinical studies and has been found to work.Chemo : sucks but worksLeeches : suck and do n't work except in special cases as temporary therapy for reattachment of fingers and toes</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...which is what much of modern chemotherapy amounts too will be looked back on like we look on bloodletting to keep your humors in order.Except for the little fact that, as much as chemo sucks and as much as it closely resembles taking just enough arsenic mixed with mercury topped with cyanide to wish you were dead, it is backed up by clinical studies and has been found to work.Chemo: sucks but worksLeeches: suck and don't work except in special cases as temporary therapy for reattachment of fingers and toes
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206252</id>
	<title>Re:Probably 1940s peak of USA</title>
	<author>jpcarter</author>
	<datestamp>1258972020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously? I wasn't around in the 1940-50's, but this always seems like historical revisionism to me. How has the standard of living dropped in relative terms if "<a href="http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/ratrace.html" title="mit.edu" rel="nofollow">In 1950 some 35 percent of dwellings lacked full indoor plumbing</a> [mit.edu]"? Not to mention all the junk I can purchase for Black Friday coming up.</p><p>Or what about McCarthyism in Washington? I'll agree we seem to lack an Edward R. Murrow reporter, but I think current politics are still better than the panic &amp; blacklists that existed then.</p><p>But, like I said, I wasn't around &amp; IANAH, so I'd be interested to hear how I'm wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously ?
I was n't around in the 1940-50 's , but this always seems like historical revisionism to me .
How has the standard of living dropped in relative terms if " In 1950 some 35 percent of dwellings lacked full indoor plumbing [ mit.edu ] " ?
Not to mention all the junk I can purchase for Black Friday coming up.Or what about McCarthyism in Washington ?
I 'll agree we seem to lack an Edward R. Murrow reporter , but I think current politics are still better than the panic &amp; blacklists that existed then.But , like I said , I was n't around &amp; IANAH , so I 'd be interested to hear how I 'm wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously?
I wasn't around in the 1940-50's, but this always seems like historical revisionism to me.
How has the standard of living dropped in relative terms if "In 1950 some 35 percent of dwellings lacked full indoor plumbing [mit.edu]"?
Not to mention all the junk I can purchase for Black Friday coming up.Or what about McCarthyism in Washington?
I'll agree we seem to lack an Edward R. Murrow reporter, but I think current politics are still better than the panic &amp; blacklists that existed then.But, like I said, I wasn't around &amp; IANAH, so I'd be interested to hear how I'm wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207660</id>
	<title>Re:No... WoW vs pretend warfair with sticks for gu</title>
	<author>Orion Blastar</author>
	<datestamp>1258977540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Before WoW we got foam plastic swords and other foam weapons and wrapped them up with Duct Tape to look like metal and dressed up in suits of armor and hit each other with them at a Medieval War reenactment or LARP D&amp;D event. Before WoW we had D&amp;D from TSR before Hasbro or Garfield Games or whomever bought them out and made D20. The Classic D&amp;D and LARP D&amp;D were better in the old days.<br>I shot you your dead! Am not!" arguments were resolved by the Dungeon Master and dice rolling and hit points.</p><p>Before we had the first person shooters we had today we had Wolfenstein 3D for MS-DOS, and the original Castle Wolfenstein for Apple II, C64, and other 8 bit systems.</p><p>Before we had Need for Speed we had "Night Driver" with the driving controller for the Atari 2600.</p><p>Before Facebook we had dial-up BBSes and FidoNet, WWIVNet, and other dial-up networks for single line BBS boards to network with each other before the Internet became popular and it was just the Arpanet back then. Thanks to the Waffle software BBSes could interface with Arpanet Newsgroups and Email. FidoBBS, WWIVBBS, and other BBSes were our social networking sites, but local so people could meet the faces behind the BBS screen names and handles. Now it isn't local it is International, and people don't meet in person anymore except in rare cases, but prefer to chat via the Internet and text messaging.</p><p>Before the iPod, we had the Sony Walkman and portable AM/FM radios, Boom Boxes, portable 8-Track players, and the knockoff Walkman type devices made by Sears, K-mart, Wallgreens, etc that had a cassette player and AM and FM radio. But now some cell phones have FM radio built in and can play media files and the iPod became the iPhone, and the Smart Phone and Blackberries do the same things as well.</p><p>The best we had was those 8 Bit systems like the Atari 2600, ColecoVision, Matell Intellivision, Atari 5200, Atari 7800, and then the Nintendo NES and SNES, Sega Master System and Sega Genesis and we started to get into 16 bit systems. The Sega CD32, Dreamcast, Saturn, were CD based systems but the Sony Playstation out marketed and out licensed them by licensing as many games for the PS1 as possible. It drove Sega out of the game console market but they made video games for other systems. he Atari Jaguar was a good system but it lack popularity and the games and Atari had poor marketing like Commodore and the C64GS game console. But now those retro games are available for the XBox 360, Nintendo Wii, and Playstation 3 via paying a small fee via the Gaming Networks and downloading the emulators with the retro game ROMs in them to play the classics in modern times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Before WoW we got foam plastic swords and other foam weapons and wrapped them up with Duct Tape to look like metal and dressed up in suits of armor and hit each other with them at a Medieval War reenactment or LARP D&amp;D event .
Before WoW we had D&amp;D from TSR before Hasbro or Garfield Games or whomever bought them out and made D20 .
The Classic D&amp;D and LARP D&amp;D were better in the old days.I shot you your dead !
Am not !
" arguments were resolved by the Dungeon Master and dice rolling and hit points.Before we had the first person shooters we had today we had Wolfenstein 3D for MS-DOS , and the original Castle Wolfenstein for Apple II , C64 , and other 8 bit systems.Before we had Need for Speed we had " Night Driver " with the driving controller for the Atari 2600.Before Facebook we had dial-up BBSes and FidoNet , WWIVNet , and other dial-up networks for single line BBS boards to network with each other before the Internet became popular and it was just the Arpanet back then .
Thanks to the Waffle software BBSes could interface with Arpanet Newsgroups and Email .
FidoBBS , WWIVBBS , and other BBSes were our social networking sites , but local so people could meet the faces behind the BBS screen names and handles .
Now it is n't local it is International , and people do n't meet in person anymore except in rare cases , but prefer to chat via the Internet and text messaging.Before the iPod , we had the Sony Walkman and portable AM/FM radios , Boom Boxes , portable 8-Track players , and the knockoff Walkman type devices made by Sears , K-mart , Wallgreens , etc that had a cassette player and AM and FM radio .
But now some cell phones have FM radio built in and can play media files and the iPod became the iPhone , and the Smart Phone and Blackberries do the same things as well.The best we had was those 8 Bit systems like the Atari 2600 , ColecoVision , Matell Intellivision , Atari 5200 , Atari 7800 , and then the Nintendo NES and SNES , Sega Master System and Sega Genesis and we started to get into 16 bit systems .
The Sega CD32 , Dreamcast , Saturn , were CD based systems but the Sony Playstation out marketed and out licensed them by licensing as many games for the PS1 as possible .
It drove Sega out of the game console market but they made video games for other systems .
he Atari Jaguar was a good system but it lack popularity and the games and Atari had poor marketing like Commodore and the C64GS game console .
But now those retro games are available for the XBox 360 , Nintendo Wii , and Playstation 3 via paying a small fee via the Gaming Networks and downloading the emulators with the retro game ROMs in them to play the classics in modern times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Before WoW we got foam plastic swords and other foam weapons and wrapped them up with Duct Tape to look like metal and dressed up in suits of armor and hit each other with them at a Medieval War reenactment or LARP D&amp;D event.
Before WoW we had D&amp;D from TSR before Hasbro or Garfield Games or whomever bought them out and made D20.
The Classic D&amp;D and LARP D&amp;D were better in the old days.I shot you your dead!
Am not!
" arguments were resolved by the Dungeon Master and dice rolling and hit points.Before we had the first person shooters we had today we had Wolfenstein 3D for MS-DOS, and the original Castle Wolfenstein for Apple II, C64, and other 8 bit systems.Before we had Need for Speed we had "Night Driver" with the driving controller for the Atari 2600.Before Facebook we had dial-up BBSes and FidoNet, WWIVNet, and other dial-up networks for single line BBS boards to network with each other before the Internet became popular and it was just the Arpanet back then.
Thanks to the Waffle software BBSes could interface with Arpanet Newsgroups and Email.
FidoBBS, WWIVBBS, and other BBSes were our social networking sites, but local so people could meet the faces behind the BBS screen names and handles.
Now it isn't local it is International, and people don't meet in person anymore except in rare cases, but prefer to chat via the Internet and text messaging.Before the iPod, we had the Sony Walkman and portable AM/FM radios, Boom Boxes, portable 8-Track players, and the knockoff Walkman type devices made by Sears, K-mart, Wallgreens, etc that had a cassette player and AM and FM radio.
But now some cell phones have FM radio built in and can play media files and the iPod became the iPhone, and the Smart Phone and Blackberries do the same things as well.The best we had was those 8 Bit systems like the Atari 2600, ColecoVision, Matell Intellivision, Atari 5200, Atari 7800, and then the Nintendo NES and SNES, Sega Master System and Sega Genesis and we started to get into 16 bit systems.
The Sega CD32, Dreamcast, Saturn, were CD based systems but the Sony Playstation out marketed and out licensed them by licensing as many games for the PS1 as possible.
It drove Sega out of the game console market but they made video games for other systems.
he Atari Jaguar was a good system but it lack popularity and the games and Atari had poor marketing like Commodore and the C64GS game console.
But now those retro games are available for the XBox 360, Nintendo Wii, and Playstation 3 via paying a small fee via the Gaming Networks and downloading the emulators with the retro game ROMs in them to play the classics in modern times.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204906</id>
	<title>Re:No... WoW vs pretend warfair with sticks for gu</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1259007840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I was growing up, we had *real* dirt clod fights!</p><p>We would mound up dirt a short distance from one another, and a combination of lobbing and more direct throws were done until you hit the *enemy*. At which point, if you hit them hard enough or partially blinded them with dirt in the eyes, you then grabbed a handful of dirt clods, rush your enemy's bunker, rapid firing to keep him pinned down, then while he was writhing on the ground, if you had any clods left that this point, you would finish him off and dance some horrid resemblance to a "war victory dance".</p><p>Yeah, those were good times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was growing up , we had * real * dirt clod fights ! We would mound up dirt a short distance from one another , and a combination of lobbing and more direct throws were done until you hit the * enemy * .
At which point , if you hit them hard enough or partially blinded them with dirt in the eyes , you then grabbed a handful of dirt clods , rush your enemy 's bunker , rapid firing to keep him pinned down , then while he was writhing on the ground , if you had any clods left that this point , you would finish him off and dance some horrid resemblance to a " war victory dance " .Yeah , those were good times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was growing up, we had *real* dirt clod fights!We would mound up dirt a short distance from one another, and a combination of lobbing and more direct throws were done until you hit the *enemy*.
At which point, if you hit them hard enough or partially blinded them with dirt in the eyes, you then grabbed a handful of dirt clods, rush your enemy's bunker, rapid firing to keep him pinned down, then while he was writhing on the ground, if you had any clods left that this point, you would finish him off and dance some horrid resemblance to a "war victory dance".Yeah, those were good times.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30225316</id>
	<title>Re:No... WoW vs pretend warfair with sticks for gu</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1257173640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Or, to put it more plainly, how many would do it IRL if they were guaranteed they could get away with it.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
All those who are psychopaths/sociopaths who will probably do it anyway as they are generally too narcissisti to believe they could ever make a mistake and be caught.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , to put it more plainly , how many would do it IRL if they were guaranteed they could get away with it .
All those who are psychopaths/sociopaths who will probably do it anyway as they are generally too narcissisti to believe they could ever make a mistake and be caught .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, to put it more plainly, how many would do it IRL if they were guaranteed they could get away with it.
All those who are psychopaths/sociopaths who will probably do it anyway as they are generally too narcissisti to believe they could ever make a mistake and be caught.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204742</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204732
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205606
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204928
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30210212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30209128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30209890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30229432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30214062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30219410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204874
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30225400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30210234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30221804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30210122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30225316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30209350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30219538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30209908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30213224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1721206_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1721206.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205344
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1721206.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204958
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1721206.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208040
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30229432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30210234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205042
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205674
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30209908
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206228
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205436
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205748
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30221804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206646
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1721206.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205014
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1721206.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205606
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1721206.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205290
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1721206.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205170
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1721206.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208174
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1721206.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205050
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207680
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206280
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206472
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208034
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205130
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208652
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205780
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30219410
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205628
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207056
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30219538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30209350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207970
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1721206.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30209128
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1721206.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204922
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30214062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30209890
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1721206.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205272
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1721206.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207752
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1721206.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205900
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1721206.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204742
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205208
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208224
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30225316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204906
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30213224
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205494
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1721206.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204670
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1721206.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205254
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30206206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30210122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30207882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30225400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205874
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208740
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30208572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30205218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1721206.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30204928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1721206.30210212
</commentlist>
</conversation>
