<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_20_170212</id>
	<title>How Heavy Is the Internet?</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1258715280000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Ever wondered <a href="http://crave.cnet.co.uk/gadgets/0,39029552,49304012,00.htm">how much the internet physically weighs?</a> 498,438,559,990kg, according to CNET. To reach this figure, they added together public data on the weight of every computer, server and connecting cable. To this they added 6,075,000kg of iPhones, and over 6,800,000kg of Blackberries. Finally, they added the weight of 287,524 viruses and 85 billion+ webpages."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Ever wondered how much the internet physically weighs ?
498,438,559,990kg , according to CNET .
To reach this figure , they added together public data on the weight of every computer , server and connecting cable .
To this they added 6,075,000kg of iPhones , and over 6,800,000kg of Blackberries .
Finally , they added the weight of 287,524 viruses and 85 billion + webpages .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Ever wondered how much the internet physically weighs?
498,438,559,990kg, according to CNET.
To reach this figure, they added together public data on the weight of every computer, server and connecting cable.
To this they added 6,075,000kg of iPhones, and over 6,800,000kg of Blackberries.
Finally, they added the weight of 287,524 viruses and 85 billion+ webpages.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179270</id>
	<title>idleispants</title>
	<author>davidwr</author>
	<datestamp>1258719240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why isn't this in idle?</p><p>If it's supposed to be serious, you have to amortize the weight of the equipment over its uses.  A desktop that spends half its use playing solitaire, 1/4 of its use surfing the web, and 1/4 of its use spamming the world under viral control only counts for half.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is n't this in idle ? If it 's supposed to be serious , you have to amortize the weight of the equipment over its uses .
A desktop that spends half its use playing solitaire , 1/4 of its use surfing the web , and 1/4 of its use spamming the world under viral control only counts for half .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why isn't this in idle?If it's supposed to be serious, you have to amortize the weight of the equipment over its uses.
A desktop that spends half its use playing solitaire, 1/4 of its use surfing the web, and 1/4 of its use spamming the world under viral control only counts for half.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179540</id>
	<title>Re:Not to mention</title>
	<author>sconeu</author>
	<datestamp>1258720380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And CowboyNeal accounts for half of all that user weight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And CowboyNeal accounts for half of all that user weight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And CowboyNeal accounts for half of all that user weight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180842</id>
	<title>Where is that scale from?</title>
	<author>eamonman</author>
	<datestamp>1258728000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't find it on tineye... That's pretty cool!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't find it on tineye... That 's pretty cool !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't find it on tineye... That's pretty cool!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179882</id>
	<title>Computers are heavy</title>
	<author>Kenoli</author>
	<datestamp>1258722180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's just weigh the portions of human brains containing the abstract concept of the internet instead.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's just weigh the portions of human brains containing the abstract concept of the internet instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's just weigh the portions of human brains containing the abstract concept of the internet instead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179968</id>
	<title>Lighter Than Before</title>
	<author>BryanL</author>
	<datestamp>1258722600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, after this fluff piece, I would say the internet just got lighter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , after this fluff piece , I would say the internet just got lighter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, after this fluff piece, I would say the internet just got lighter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30183974</id>
	<title>Re:Slightly heavier then...</title>
	<author>MattGWU</author>
	<datestamp>1258816800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The first time I had it, Delirium Tremens tasted purple to me.  "If I poured this beer into a glass* it wouldn't surprise me if it was purple."  Seven is an interesting shade of mauve.</p><p>*I know, it was at a chain sports bar and they didn't give us glasses</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first time I had it , Delirium Tremens tasted purple to me .
" If I poured this beer into a glass * it would n't surprise me if it was purple .
" Seven is an interesting shade of mauve .
* I know , it was at a chain sports bar and they did n't give us glasses</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first time I had it, Delirium Tremens tasted purple to me.
"If I poured this beer into a glass* it wouldn't surprise me if it was purple.
"  Seven is an interesting shade of mauve.
*I know, it was at a chain sports bar and they didn't give us glasses</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179224</id>
	<title>It doesn't weigh anything</title>
	<author>MrFancyPants</author>
	<datestamp>1258719060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>0 lbs, 0 kgs. Duh. The internet doesn't <b>weigh</b> anything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>0 lbs , 0 kgs .
Duh. The internet does n't weigh anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>0 lbs, 0 kgs.
Duh. The internet doesn't weigh anything.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180294</id>
	<title>Hard to give this any creditability</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258724220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i> <b> Finally, they added the weight of 287,524 viruses</b> </i> </p><p>
When they make a statement like this, when no weight can be assigned to a computer virus, they pretty much completely discredit themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , they added the weight of 287,524 viruses When they make a statement like this , when no weight can be assigned to a computer virus , they pretty much completely discredit themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>   Finally, they added the weight of 287,524 viruses  
When they make a statement like this, when no weight can be assigned to a computer virus, they pretty much completely discredit themselves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179948</id>
	<title>How Heavy is The Internet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258722540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it left the house in high heels and when it came back it had on flip flops.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it went to KFC to get a bucket of chicken they asked it what size and it said the one on the roof.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy that I ran out of gas trying to drive around it.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy its on both sides of the family<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy you have to grease the door frame and hold a twinkie on the other side just to get it through<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it sets off car alarms when it runs.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it laid on the beach and greenpeace tried to push it back in the water<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy the only pictures you have of it are satellite pictures<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it jumped in the air and got stuck.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it put on some BVD's and by the time they reached its waist they spelled out boulevard.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it stepped on a rainbow and made Skittles.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy that it would have been in E.T., but when it rode the bike across the moon it caused an eclipse.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it was baptised in the ocean.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it has to iron its clothes in the driveway.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy they tie a rope around its infrastructure and drag it through a tunnel when they want to clean it.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy when it got hit by a bus, it said, "Who threw that rock?"<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy when it stands in a left-turn lane it gives it the green arrow.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy that when it was born it gave the hospital stretch marks.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy we went to the drive-in and didn't have to pay because we dressed it as a Chevrolet.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy when it beeper goes off, people thought it was backing up.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it eats Wheat Thicks.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy we're in it right now.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy people jog around it for exercise<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it wears neck deorderant<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it has pork rind incense burning in its house.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy when it sits on the beach it makes sandpaper<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it wears a sock on each toe<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it DNA is DRO (for Dorito)<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it went to the movies and sat next to everyone<br>
 The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy you have to roll over twice to get off it<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it was floating in the ocean and Spain claimed it for then new world<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy when you get on top of it your ears pop<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy the army stole its underwear to use as parachutes<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy when it wears a yellow raincoat, people said "Taxi!"<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it had to go to Sea World to get baptized<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy its got to iron its pants on the driveway<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it puts insurance on its food<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it can hear bacon cooking in Canada<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it put on its lipstick with a paint-roller<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy NASA thought it caused a solar eclipse<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it's got to pull down its pants to get into its pockets<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy when it tripped over on 4th Ave, it landed on 12th<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy when it bungee jumps, it brings down the bridge too<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy the highway patrol made it wear "Caution! Wide Turn"<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy when it sits around the house, it SITS AROUND THE HOUSE!<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy when it steps on a scale, it reads "one at a time, please"<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy when it sits on my face I can't hear the stereo.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy it fell in love and broke it.<br>The Internet&rsquo;s so heavy when</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Internet    s so heavy it left the house in high heels and when it came back it had on flip flops.The Internet    s so heavy it went to KFC to get a bucket of chicken they asked it what size and it said the one on the roof.The Internet    s so heavy that I ran out of gas trying to drive around it.The Internet    s so heavy its on both sides of the familyThe Internet    s so heavy you have to grease the door frame and hold a twinkie on the other side just to get it throughThe Internet    s so heavy it sets off car alarms when it runs.The Internet    s so heavy it laid on the beach and greenpeace tried to push it back in the waterThe Internet    s so heavy the only pictures you have of it are satellite picturesThe Internet    s so heavy it jumped in the air and got stuck.The Internet    s so heavy it put on some BVD 's and by the time they reached its waist they spelled out boulevard.The Internet    s so heavy it stepped on a rainbow and made Skittles.The Internet    s so heavy that it would have been in E.T. , but when it rode the bike across the moon it caused an eclipse.The Internet    s so heavy it was baptised in the ocean.The Internet    s so heavy it has to iron its clothes in the driveway.The Internet    s so heavy they tie a rope around its infrastructure and drag it through a tunnel when they want to clean it.The Internet    s so heavy when it got hit by a bus , it said , " Who threw that rock ?
" The Internet    s so heavy when it stands in a left-turn lane it gives it the green arrow.The Internet    s so heavy that when it was born it gave the hospital stretch marks.The Internet    s so heavy we went to the drive-in and did n't have to pay because we dressed it as a Chevrolet.The Internet    s so heavy when it beeper goes off , people thought it was backing up.The Internet    s so heavy it eats Wheat Thicks.The Internet    s so heavy we 're in it right now.The Internet    s so heavy people jog around it for exerciseThe Internet    s so heavy it wears neck deorderantThe Internet    s so heavy it has pork rind incense burning in its house.The Internet    s so heavy when it sits on the beach it makes sandpaperThe Internet    s so heavy it wears a sock on each toeThe Internet    s so heavy it DNA is DRO ( for Dorito ) The Internet    s so heavy it went to the movies and sat next to everyone The Internet    s so heavy you have to roll over twice to get off itThe Internet    s so heavy it was floating in the ocean and Spain claimed it for then new worldThe Internet    s so heavy when you get on top of it your ears popThe Internet    s so heavy the army stole its underwear to use as parachutesThe Internet    s so heavy when it wears a yellow raincoat , people said " Taxi !
" The Internet    s so heavy it had to go to Sea World to get baptizedThe Internet    s so heavy its got to iron its pants on the drivewayThe Internet    s so heavy it puts insurance on its foodThe Internet    s so heavy it can hear bacon cooking in CanadaThe Internet    s so heavy it put on its lipstick with a paint-rollerThe Internet    s so heavy NASA thought it caused a solar eclipseThe Internet    s so heavy it 's got to pull down its pants to get into its pocketsThe Internet    s so heavy when it tripped over on 4th Ave , it landed on 12thThe Internet    s so heavy when it bungee jumps , it brings down the bridge tooThe Internet    s so heavy the highway patrol made it wear " Caution !
Wide Turn " The Internet    s so heavy when it sits around the house , it SITS AROUND THE HOUSE ! The Internet    s so heavy when it steps on a scale , it reads " one at a time , please " The Internet    s so heavy when it sits on my face I ca n't hear the stereo.The Internet    s so heavy it fell in love and broke it.The Internet    s so heavy when</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Internet’s so heavy it left the house in high heels and when it came back it had on flip flops.The Internet’s so heavy it went to KFC to get a bucket of chicken they asked it what size and it said the one on the roof.The Internet’s so heavy that I ran out of gas trying to drive around it.The Internet’s so heavy its on both sides of the familyThe Internet’s so heavy you have to grease the door frame and hold a twinkie on the other side just to get it throughThe Internet’s so heavy it sets off car alarms when it runs.The Internet’s so heavy it laid on the beach and greenpeace tried to push it back in the waterThe Internet’s so heavy the only pictures you have of it are satellite picturesThe Internet’s so heavy it jumped in the air and got stuck.The Internet’s so heavy it put on some BVD's and by the time they reached its waist they spelled out boulevard.The Internet’s so heavy it stepped on a rainbow and made Skittles.The Internet’s so heavy that it would have been in E.T., but when it rode the bike across the moon it caused an eclipse.The Internet’s so heavy it was baptised in the ocean.The Internet’s so heavy it has to iron its clothes in the driveway.The Internet’s so heavy they tie a rope around its infrastructure and drag it through a tunnel when they want to clean it.The Internet’s so heavy when it got hit by a bus, it said, "Who threw that rock?
"The Internet’s so heavy when it stands in a left-turn lane it gives it the green arrow.The Internet’s so heavy that when it was born it gave the hospital stretch marks.The Internet’s so heavy we went to the drive-in and didn't have to pay because we dressed it as a Chevrolet.The Internet’s so heavy when it beeper goes off, people thought it was backing up.The Internet’s so heavy it eats Wheat Thicks.The Internet’s so heavy we're in it right now.The Internet’s so heavy people jog around it for exerciseThe Internet’s so heavy it wears neck deorderantThe Internet’s so heavy it has pork rind incense burning in its house.The Internet’s so heavy when it sits on the beach it makes sandpaperThe Internet’s so heavy it wears a sock on each toeThe Internet’s so heavy it DNA is DRO (for Dorito)The Internet’s so heavy it went to the movies and sat next to everyone
 The Internet’s so heavy you have to roll over twice to get off itThe Internet’s so heavy it was floating in the ocean and Spain claimed it for then new worldThe Internet’s so heavy when you get on top of it your ears popThe Internet’s so heavy the army stole its underwear to use as parachutesThe Internet’s so heavy when it wears a yellow raincoat, people said "Taxi!
"The Internet’s so heavy it had to go to Sea World to get baptizedThe Internet’s so heavy its got to iron its pants on the drivewayThe Internet’s so heavy it puts insurance on its foodThe Internet’s so heavy it can hear bacon cooking in CanadaThe Internet’s so heavy it put on its lipstick with a paint-rollerThe Internet’s so heavy NASA thought it caused a solar eclipseThe Internet’s so heavy it's got to pull down its pants to get into its pocketsThe Internet’s so heavy when it tripped over on 4th Ave, it landed on 12thThe Internet’s so heavy when it bungee jumps, it brings down the bridge tooThe Internet’s so heavy the highway patrol made it wear "Caution!
Wide Turn"The Internet’s so heavy when it sits around the house, it SITS AROUND THE HOUSE!The Internet’s so heavy when it steps on a scale, it reads "one at a time, please"The Internet’s so heavy when it sits on my face I can't hear the stereo.The Internet’s so heavy it fell in love and broke it.The Internet’s so heavy when</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30183238</id>
	<title>Re:Slightly heavier then...</title>
	<author>war4peace</author>
	<datestamp>1258804320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're wrong, <i>nothing</i> is heavier than that.<br>
Jokes apart, the Internet doesn't have a weight attribute. When I see such articles, I remember that episode from "The IT Crowd":<br>
"This is... the Internet!" (audience gasps) - it was just a box with a red LED blinking on it.<br>
It's just people having no clue what the Internet is and trying to make it understandable by applying measurable attributes; or people trying to be funny. No atter the reason, they're unsuccessful.<br>
Now all of you, please turn off your computers, iPhones and Blackberries, so that the Power Grid, GSM Array AND the Internet can lose some weight and live happily ever after... in the most amazing threesome we ever had the chance not to see.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're wrong , nothing is heavier than that .
Jokes apart , the Internet does n't have a weight attribute .
When I see such articles , I remember that episode from " The IT Crowd " : " This is... the Internet !
" ( audience gasps ) - it was just a box with a red LED blinking on it .
It 's just people having no clue what the Internet is and trying to make it understandable by applying measurable attributes ; or people trying to be funny .
No atter the reason , they 're unsuccessful .
Now all of you , please turn off your computers , iPhones and Blackberries , so that the Power Grid , GSM Array AND the Internet can lose some weight and live happily ever after... in the most amazing threesome we ever had the chance not to see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're wrong, nothing is heavier than that.
Jokes apart, the Internet doesn't have a weight attribute.
When I see such articles, I remember that episode from "The IT Crowd":
"This is... the Internet!
" (audience gasps) - it was just a box with a red LED blinking on it.
It's just people having no clue what the Internet is and trying to make it understandable by applying measurable attributes; or people trying to be funny.
No atter the reason, they're unsuccessful.
Now all of you, please turn off your computers, iPhones and Blackberries, so that the Power Grid, GSM Array AND the Internet can lose some weight and live happily ever after... in the most amazing threesome we ever had the chance not to see.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179938</id>
	<title>Obligatory...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258722420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>African or European?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>African or European ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>African or European?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30183378</id>
	<title>Re:It's a good thing..</title>
	<author>ribuck</author>
	<datestamp>1258807020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It is a good thing they didn't try to calculate the amount of power used...</p></div><p>An informed estimate of the <a href="http://uclue.com/?xq=724" title="uclue.com">power consumption of the internet</a> [uclue.com] was 868 billion kWh per year in 2007.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a good thing they did n't try to calculate the amount of power used...An informed estimate of the power consumption of the internet [ uclue.com ] was 868 billion kWh per year in 2007 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a good thing they didn't try to calculate the amount of power used...An informed estimate of the power consumption of the internet [uclue.com] was 868 billion kWh per year in 2007.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179320</id>
	<title>It's not...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258719420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>April yet, is it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>April yet , is it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>April yet, is it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30217520</id>
	<title>Wrong, both mathematically and conceptually</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1259095140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is grossly inaccurate.</p><p>Mathematically speaking, how the holy hell did they get almost 500 billion kg? Those numbers add up to less than 25 billion kg (24,692,195,430 kg, to be exact).</p><p>Conceptually, they both included things they shouldn&rsquo;t have and omitted things they should have included.</p><p>Devices which connect to the internet and suck information from it should not be included. Getting groceries from the grocer doesn&rsquo;t make you a grocer yourself. Get rid of the personal computers and mobile devices.<br>Amount reduced: 22,850,386,120 kg, or almost 93\% of the total weight (using the correct figure, not theirs).</p><p>On the other hand, the cellular infrastructure (cell towers and repeaters) which the mobile devices connect to should most definitely be included.<br>Amount added: unknown.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is grossly inaccurate.Mathematically speaking , how the holy hell did they get almost 500 billion kg ?
Those numbers add up to less than 25 billion kg ( 24,692,195,430 kg , to be exact ) .Conceptually , they both included things they shouldn    t have and omitted things they should have included.Devices which connect to the internet and suck information from it should not be included .
Getting groceries from the grocer doesn    t make you a grocer yourself .
Get rid of the personal computers and mobile devices.Amount reduced : 22,850,386,120 kg , or almost 93 \ % of the total weight ( using the correct figure , not theirs ) .On the other hand , the cellular infrastructure ( cell towers and repeaters ) which the mobile devices connect to should most definitely be included.Amount added : unknown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is grossly inaccurate.Mathematically speaking, how the holy hell did they get almost 500 billion kg?
Those numbers add up to less than 25 billion kg (24,692,195,430 kg, to be exact).Conceptually, they both included things they shouldn’t have and omitted things they should have included.Devices which connect to the internet and suck information from it should not be included.
Getting groceries from the grocer doesn’t make you a grocer yourself.
Get rid of the personal computers and mobile devices.Amount reduced: 22,850,386,120 kg, or almost 93\% of the total weight (using the correct figure, not theirs).On the other hand, the cellular infrastructure (cell towers and repeaters) which the mobile devices connect to should most definitely be included.Amount added: unknown.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180266</id>
	<title>Oh shit!</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1258724160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it gets much heavier the Earth might sink!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it gets much heavier the Earth might sink !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it gets much heavier the Earth might sink!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179914</id>
	<title>Re: That's like asking "how red is 7?"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258722300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What a fucked up metric. That's like asking "how red is 7?"</p></div></blockquote><p>That's not nearly as f'ed up as you might think.  See: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grapheme-color\_synesthesia" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grapheme-color\_synesthesia</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>Ask enough people and I'm sure you can actually come to an appropriate answer to the question of just how red the number 7 is.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What a fucked up metric .
That 's like asking " how red is 7 ?
" That 's not nearly as f'ed up as you might think .
See : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grapheme-color \ _synesthesia [ wikipedia.org ] Ask enough people and I 'm sure you can actually come to an appropriate answer to the question of just how red the number 7 is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a fucked up metric.
That's like asking "how red is 7?
"That's not nearly as f'ed up as you might think.
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grapheme-color\_synesthesia [wikipedia.org]Ask enough people and I'm sure you can actually come to an appropriate answer to the question of just how red the number 7 is.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179750</id>
	<title>Not weight</title>
	<author>royallthefourth</author>
	<datestamp>1258721520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Grams is a measure of mass, not weight. Take something to the Moon and it will have far less weight, but the mass will remain constant.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Grams is a measure of mass , not weight .
Take something to the Moon and it will have far less weight , but the mass will remain constant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Grams is a measure of mass, not weight.
Take something to the Moon and it will have far less weight, but the mass will remain constant.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182604</id>
	<title>Cloud</title>
	<author>corychristison</author>
	<datestamp>1258835280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How heavy is a cloud?</p><p>You've got your answer.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/mesnickers</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How heavy is a cloud ? You 've got your answer .
/mesnickers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How heavy is a cloud?You've got your answer.
/mesnickers</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30181432</id>
	<title>Re:498,438,559,990kg??</title>
	<author>4181</author>
	<datestamp>1258733100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That's a very precise figure for something that's just a rough estimate!</p></div><p>Besides being both overly precise and essentially meaningless, there is no indication of how it was derived.  They give a number of subtotals that sum to less than 5\% of their total.</p><p>

22,837,511,120 kg = 570,937,778 computers * 40 kg/computer [those are heavy boxen]<br>
1,754,809,310 kg = 175,480,931 servers * 10 kg/server<br>
87,000,000 kg = 15,000 km TAT-14 cable * 5.8 kg/m-of-cable<br>
6,075,000 kg = 42,000,000 iPhones * approx 144.64 g/iPhone [the review they link to claims 133 g]<br>
6,800,000 kg = 50,000,000 Blackberries * 136 g/Blackberry<br>
<br>
24,692,195,430 kg  sum<br>
498,438,559,990 kg  their total</p><p>The cable figure is only for the "TAT-14 cable that links the US to France, the Netherlands, Germany, Denmark and the UK", but they make no indication that they are scaling it up.</p><p>So, I wonder how they did arrive at their meaningless number.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a very precise figure for something that 's just a rough estimate ! Besides being both overly precise and essentially meaningless , there is no indication of how it was derived .
They give a number of subtotals that sum to less than 5 \ % of their total .
22,837,511,120 kg = 570,937,778 computers * 40 kg/computer [ those are heavy boxen ] 1,754,809,310 kg = 175,480,931 servers * 10 kg/server 87,000,000 kg = 15,000 km TAT-14 cable * 5.8 kg/m-of-cable 6,075,000 kg = 42,000,000 iPhones * approx 144.64 g/iPhone [ the review they link to claims 133 g ] 6,800,000 kg = 50,000,000 Blackberries * 136 g/Blackberry 24,692,195,430 kg sum 498,438,559,990 kg their totalThe cable figure is only for the " TAT-14 cable that links the US to France , the Netherlands , Germany , Denmark and the UK " , but they make no indication that they are scaling it up.So , I wonder how they did arrive at their meaningless number .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a very precise figure for something that's just a rough estimate!Besides being both overly precise and essentially meaningless, there is no indication of how it was derived.
They give a number of subtotals that sum to less than 5\% of their total.
22,837,511,120 kg = 570,937,778 computers * 40 kg/computer [those are heavy boxen]
1,754,809,310 kg = 175,480,931 servers * 10 kg/server
87,000,000 kg = 15,000 km TAT-14 cable * 5.8 kg/m-of-cable
6,075,000 kg = 42,000,000 iPhones * approx 144.64 g/iPhone [the review they link to claims 133 g]
6,800,000 kg = 50,000,000 Blackberries * 136 g/Blackberry

24,692,195,430 kg  sum
498,438,559,990 kg  their totalThe cable figure is only for the "TAT-14 cable that links the US to France, the Netherlands, Germany, Denmark and the UK", but they make no indication that they are scaling it up.So, I wonder how they did arrive at their meaningless number.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30181730</id>
	<title>This reminds me of</title>
	<author>bguiz</author>
	<datestamp>1258736280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The episode of the IT crowd, where the protagonsists got a black cardboard box and put blinking lights on it, and fooled everyone into thinking it was &quot;The Intenet&quot;</p><p>Q: <b>&quot;How come there's no wires?&quot;</b> <br>
A: <b>&quot;Because it&apos;wireless!&quot;</b> </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The episode of the IT crowd , where the protagonsists got a black cardboard box and put blinking lights on it , and fooled everyone into thinking it was " The Intenet " Q : " How come there 's no wires ?
" A : " Because it&amp;apos ; wireless !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The episode of the IT crowd, where the protagonsists got a black cardboard box and put blinking lights on it, and fooled everyone into thinking it was "The Intenet"Q: "How come there's no wires?
" 
A: "Because it&amp;apos;wireless!
" </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180528</id>
	<title>Electrons?</title>
	<author>dandart</author>
	<datestamp>1258725720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But, isn't the Internet electrons and light? The internet is not a wire, it flows in a wire.... so surely it's the mass of the electrons and light!
<br> <br>And of course they're more massive than you might expect due to relativistic effects.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But , is n't the Internet electrons and light ?
The internet is not a wire , it flows in a wire.... so surely it 's the mass of the electrons and light !
And of course they 're more massive than you might expect due to relativistic effects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But, isn't the Internet electrons and light?
The internet is not a wire, it flows in a wire.... so surely it's the mass of the electrons and light!
And of course they're more massive than you might expect due to relativistic effects.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30200914</id>
	<title>Re:It doesn't weigh anything</title>
	<author>pilybaby</author>
	<datestamp>1258984500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You wont mind if I put everything connected to the internet on your lap then?<br> <br>
I think you'd start to cry after I put only the PCs in my house on your lap.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You wont mind if I put everything connected to the internet on your lap then ?
I think you 'd start to cry after I put only the PCs in my house on your lap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You wont mind if I put everything connected to the internet on your lap then?
I think you'd start to cry after I put only the PCs in my house on your lap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30181290</id>
	<title>Network Gear?</title>
	<author>jvp</author>
	<datestamp>1258731720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Newer Cisco routers are measured in tons.  I'm not actually kidding...  The CRS model breaches 4000lbs, depending on how it's configured and optioned out.  I don't know if the folks that did this considered the networking gear required to move packets from point A to Z, but that stuff isn't necessarily light weight.</p><p>jas</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Newer Cisco routers are measured in tons .
I 'm not actually kidding... The CRS model breaches 4000lbs , depending on how it 's configured and optioned out .
I do n't know if the folks that did this considered the networking gear required to move packets from point A to Z , but that stuff is n't necessarily light weight.jas</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Newer Cisco routers are measured in tons.
I'm not actually kidding...  The CRS model breaches 4000lbs, depending on how it's configured and optioned out.
I don't know if the folks that did this considered the networking gear required to move packets from point A to Z, but that stuff isn't necessarily light weight.jas</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180504</id>
	<title>Re:Slightly heavier then...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258725600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a stupid metric, but it's not an intangible one. In order for data to exist, there must be media for it to be stored on. Whether that be hard drives, optical discs or punch cards, there is still a minimum weight that the all of the data in the world would require in order to merely exist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a stupid metric , but it 's not an intangible one .
In order for data to exist , there must be media for it to be stored on .
Whether that be hard drives , optical discs or punch cards , there is still a minimum weight that the all of the data in the world would require in order to merely exist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a stupid metric, but it's not an intangible one.
In order for data to exist, there must be media for it to be stored on.
Whether that be hard drives, optical discs or punch cards, there is still a minimum weight that the all of the data in the world would require in order to merely exist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180018</id>
	<title>Made me wonder</title>
	<author>CrazyJim1</author>
	<datestamp>1258722780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How much does the Earth weigh?  At first, you think just weigh up every object in the Earth, but you need to remember it has less weight the deeper it gets into the core, so I'm thinking you'll run into some Calculus there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How much does the Earth weigh ?
At first , you think just weigh up every object in the Earth , but you need to remember it has less weight the deeper it gets into the core , so I 'm thinking you 'll run into some Calculus there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much does the Earth weigh?
At first, you think just weigh up every object in the Earth, but you need to remember it has less weight the deeper it gets into the core, so I'm thinking you'll run into some Calculus there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180126</id>
	<title>don't be silly</title>
	<author>roman\_mir</author>
	<datestamp>1258723440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDbyYGrswtg" title="youtube.com">The Internet doesn't weigh anything.</a> [youtube.com]  Just ask the Elders of the Internet!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Internet does n't weigh anything .
[ youtube.com ] Just ask the Elders of the Internet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Internet doesn't weigh anything.
[youtube.com]  Just ask the Elders of the Internet!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30181258</id>
	<title>About 105\% of</title>
	<author>midicase</author>
	<datestamp>1258731420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the weight of the porn it carries.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the weight of the porn it carries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the weight of the porn it carries.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179344</id>
	<title>Re:OOOPS!</title>
	<author>jecowa</author>
	<datestamp>1258719480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, the internet had to install a hard drive for that post of yours. And a second one for the backup. Those two hard drive should add almost 0.2 kg to the total weight of the internet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , the internet had to install a hard drive for that post of yours .
And a second one for the backup .
Those two hard drive should add almost 0.2 kg to the total weight of the internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, the internet had to install a hard drive for that post of yours.
And a second one for the backup.
Those two hard drive should add almost 0.2 kg to the total weight of the internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182392</id>
	<title>Re:What a useless question</title>
	<author>Ralph Spoilsport</author>
	<datestamp>1258744980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I need to know how much of the internet is 1, and how much is 0.</i>
<p>
That's a really good question. I'm betting that it's more nothing than something. But I wonder if the nothing is as big compared to the something as things are to the void.
</p><p>
We are Atlantis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I need to know how much of the internet is 1 , and how much is 0 .
That 's a really good question .
I 'm betting that it 's more nothing than something .
But I wonder if the nothing is as big compared to the something as things are to the void .
We are Atlantis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I need to know how much of the internet is 1, and how much is 0.
That's a really good question.
I'm betting that it's more nothing than something.
But I wonder if the nothing is as big compared to the something as things are to the void.
We are Atlantis.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179222</id>
	<title>Not to mention</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258719060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the users...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the users.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the users...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30186700</id>
	<title>What i think.</title>
	<author>gcaronte</author>
	<datestamp>1258833900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I really love slashdot, i come every day to this site to see something interesting, don't get me wrong i really love a good joke...but this post makes me sad, this is just stupid, shame on the poster.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really love slashdot , i come every day to this site to see something interesting , do n't get me wrong i really love a good joke...but this post makes me sad , this is just stupid , shame on the poster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really love slashdot, i come every day to this site to see something interesting, don't get me wrong i really love a good joke...but this post makes me sad, this is just stupid, shame on the poster.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30183926</id>
	<title>Re:Slightly heavier then...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258816260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"how red is 7?"</p><p>None, don't you know that 7 is for blues ?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" how red is 7 ?
" None , do n't you know that 7 is for blues ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"how red is 7?
"None, don't you know that 7 is for blues ?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179444</id>
	<title>Re:Slightly heavier then...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258719960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would narrow it down to just the staff of crave.cnet.co.uk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would narrow it down to just the staff of crave.cnet.co.uk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would narrow it down to just the staff of crave.cnet.co.uk.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30205856</id>
	<title>the number is way off</title>
	<author>vuffi\_raa</author>
	<datestamp>1258970280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>think of it this way-
in my house alone:
ps3
wii
3pcs
2laptops
internet enabled media player
psp (2)(ds isn't online as it only supports wep)
internet enabled blue ray player
wifi enabled non blackberry phone

I am sure that I am forgetting something, but according to the way that the #s are it would prolly register as 1 pc on the survey.</htmltext>
<tokenext>think of it this way- in my house alone : ps3 wii 3pcs 2laptops internet enabled media player psp ( 2 ) ( ds is n't online as it only supports wep ) internet enabled blue ray player wifi enabled non blackberry phone I am sure that I am forgetting something , but according to the way that the # s are it would prolly register as 1 pc on the survey .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>think of it this way-
in my house alone:
ps3
wii
3pcs
2laptops
internet enabled media player
psp (2)(ds isn't online as it only supports wep)
internet enabled blue ray player
wifi enabled non blackberry phone

I am sure that I am forgetting something, but according to the way that the #s are it would prolly register as 1 pc on the survey.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180264</id>
	<title>Air-speed velocity of an unladen swallow?</title>
	<author>UTF-8</author>
	<datestamp>1258724100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This knowledge seems about as useful as knowing the air-speed velocity of an unladen swallow. I'll keep this in mind if I'm ever asked this question.</p><p>BTW, is this the African or European Internet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This knowledge seems about as useful as knowing the air-speed velocity of an unladen swallow .
I 'll keep this in mind if I 'm ever asked this question.BTW , is this the African or European Internet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This knowledge seems about as useful as knowing the air-speed velocity of an unladen swallow.
I'll keep this in mind if I'm ever asked this question.BTW, is this the African or European Internet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179502</id>
	<title>I don't care how HEAVY it is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258720140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...I just know that it's only half as long as my e-penis.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...I just know that it 's only half as long as my e-penis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I just know that it's only half as long as my e-penis.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180390</id>
	<title>A mathematician from Scunthorpe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258724820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Discovered the weight of his balls<br>His scrotum times three<br>Was approximately<br>Two thirds of four fifths of fuck all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Discovered the weight of his ballsHis scrotum times threeWas approximatelyTwo thirds of four fifths of fuck all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Discovered the weight of his ballsHis scrotum times threeWas approximatelyTwo thirds of four fifths of fuck all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179322</id>
	<title>Weight Distribution</title>
	<author>Reason58</author>
	<datestamp>1258719420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If that kind of weight is spread evenly then we are dangerously close to causing a global implosion. If one hemisphere gets too much technology then we may very well drift out of orbit and crash into another planet. This is what the Mayans were telling us, people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If that kind of weight is spread evenly then we are dangerously close to causing a global implosion .
If one hemisphere gets too much technology then we may very well drift out of orbit and crash into another planet .
This is what the Mayans were telling us , people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If that kind of weight is spread evenly then we are dangerously close to causing a global implosion.
If one hemisphere gets too much technology then we may very well drift out of orbit and crash into another planet.
This is what the Mayans were telling us, people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182766</id>
	<title>Re:Units</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258795080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Comparing the weight of the Internet with the weight of culture is difficult but looking into the opposite direction as the Internet is 10\% heavier than 500 million tons, then according to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125721391914624061.html" title="wsj.com" rel="nofollow">this WJS article</a> [wsj.com] it is a little heavier than the three times the amount of human waste produced by the U.S. yearly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Comparing the weight of the Internet with the weight of culture is difficult but looking into the opposite direction as the Internet is 10 \ % heavier than 500 million tons , then according to this WJS article [ wsj.com ] it is a little heavier than the three times the amount of human waste produced by the U.S. yearly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Comparing the weight of the Internet with the weight of culture is difficult but looking into the opposite direction as the Internet is 10\% heavier than 500 million tons, then according to this WJS article [wsj.com] it is a little heavier than the three times the amount of human waste produced by the U.S. yearly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179230</id>
	<title>Lightest post!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258719060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lightest post!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lightest post !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lightest post!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30186768</id>
	<title>Re:idleispants</title>
	<author>PingPongBoy</author>
	<datestamp>1258834440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><em>A desktop that spends half its use playing solitaire, 1/4 of its use surfing the web, and 1/4 of its use spamming the world under viral control only counts for half.</em></p><p>But isn't the weight for the machines holding <em>public</em> data? So your desktop isn't even addable unless it's sharing something.</p><p>Some things that may be considered: what does it take to pack it all up in boxes and carry it to another place in case the Earth/free world is no longer a viable place to host the Internet? A sense of the mining and manufacturing that was required to assemble the current state of the Internet is implied, though that would include things like buildings and food for researchers, factories, infrastructure (power, water, etc.)</p><p>There's a lot of physical hardware to make the Internet such a pervasive entity. What would be the impact as this hardware mass is multiplied? Speculation is hard to resist.</p><p>Perhaps one question should start to take hold - why isn't strong AI a reality? If a team or government agency was to just build a computer weighing 500 billion kg, it ought to solve problems intelligently, as in being able to understand problems and compute solutions without programming that targets the particular problem domains. The 500 billion kg system has now been demonstrated to be buildable - is it just a matter of time for the 500 billion kg computer to be assembled? Factoring in Moore's Law, long time no Cylon?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A desktop that spends half its use playing solitaire , 1/4 of its use surfing the web , and 1/4 of its use spamming the world under viral control only counts for half.But is n't the weight for the machines holding public data ?
So your desktop is n't even addable unless it 's sharing something.Some things that may be considered : what does it take to pack it all up in boxes and carry it to another place in case the Earth/free world is no longer a viable place to host the Internet ?
A sense of the mining and manufacturing that was required to assemble the current state of the Internet is implied , though that would include things like buildings and food for researchers , factories , infrastructure ( power , water , etc .
) There 's a lot of physical hardware to make the Internet such a pervasive entity .
What would be the impact as this hardware mass is multiplied ?
Speculation is hard to resist.Perhaps one question should start to take hold - why is n't strong AI a reality ?
If a team or government agency was to just build a computer weighing 500 billion kg , it ought to solve problems intelligently , as in being able to understand problems and compute solutions without programming that targets the particular problem domains .
The 500 billion kg system has now been demonstrated to be buildable - is it just a matter of time for the 500 billion kg computer to be assembled ?
Factoring in Moore 's Law , long time no Cylon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A desktop that spends half its use playing solitaire, 1/4 of its use surfing the web, and 1/4 of its use spamming the world under viral control only counts for half.But isn't the weight for the machines holding public data?
So your desktop isn't even addable unless it's sharing something.Some things that may be considered: what does it take to pack it all up in boxes and carry it to another place in case the Earth/free world is no longer a viable place to host the Internet?
A sense of the mining and manufacturing that was required to assemble the current state of the Internet is implied, though that would include things like buildings and food for researchers, factories, infrastructure (power, water, etc.
)There's a lot of physical hardware to make the Internet such a pervasive entity.
What would be the impact as this hardware mass is multiplied?
Speculation is hard to resist.Perhaps one question should start to take hold - why isn't strong AI a reality?
If a team or government agency was to just build a computer weighing 500 billion kg, it ought to solve problems intelligently, as in being able to understand problems and compute solutions without programming that targets the particular problem domains.
The 500 billion kg system has now been demonstrated to be buildable - is it just a matter of time for the 500 billion kg computer to be assembled?
Factoring in Moore's Law, long time no Cylon?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179392</id>
	<title>Almost 500 megatons?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258719720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>640 megatons ought to be enough for anyone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>640 megatons ought to be enough for anyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>640 megatons ought to be enough for anyone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30199762</id>
	<title>Re:What a useless question</title>
	<author>rdnetto</author>
	<datestamp>1258918260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me save you some time:<br>it's 50\% 1, 50\% 0, and 50\% i.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me save you some time : it 's 50 \ % 1 , 50 \ % 0 , and 50 \ % i .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me save you some time:it's 50\% 1, 50\% 0, and 50\% i.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30190698</id>
	<title>Re:That number needs updating.</title>
	<author>toddestan</author>
	<datestamp>1258821240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No wonder.  I thought I sensed a few less 1's out there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No wonder .
I thought I sensed a few less 1 's out there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No wonder.
I thought I sensed a few less 1's out there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179374</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182256</id>
	<title>20 billion kilos short.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258743240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did they add 100,000,000 @ 200kg = 20,000,000,000kg for the weight of the addicts?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did they add 100,000,000 @ 200kg = 20,000,000,000kg for the weight of the addicts ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did they add 100,000,000 @ 200kg = 20,000,000,000kg for the weight of the addicts?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180444</id>
	<title>The question is, do they include the users weight?</title>
	<author>AbRASiON</author>
	<datestamp>1258725240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope not<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope not : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope not :(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179954</id>
	<title>why equipment?</title>
	<author>Animaether</author>
	<datestamp>1258722540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm wondering why the measurement is with the equipment at all.  'The Internet' isn't so much the hardware it's being run on, is it?<br>Wouldn't do much good if that hardware wasn't moving bits and bytes around.</p><p>So perhaps the question should be... how much data traffic is there for 'the internet' and, by splitting that up into electrons and photons (presuming wireless signals have no mass), how much does that weigh.</p><p>I wonder if that could actually end up being an appreciable amount if measured over the course of seconds/minutes/hours/days/a week/a month/a year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm wondering why the measurement is with the equipment at all .
'The Internet ' is n't so much the hardware it 's being run on , is it ? Would n't do much good if that hardware was n't moving bits and bytes around.So perhaps the question should be... how much data traffic is there for 'the internet ' and , by splitting that up into electrons and photons ( presuming wireless signals have no mass ) , how much does that weigh.I wonder if that could actually end up being an appreciable amount if measured over the course of seconds/minutes/hours/days/a week/a month/a year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm wondering why the measurement is with the equipment at all.
'The Internet' isn't so much the hardware it's being run on, is it?Wouldn't do much good if that hardware wasn't moving bits and bytes around.So perhaps the question should be... how much data traffic is there for 'the internet' and, by splitting that up into electrons and photons (presuming wireless signals have no mass), how much does that weigh.I wonder if that could actually end up being an appreciable amount if measured over the course of seconds/minutes/hours/days/a week/a month/a year.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30181926</id>
	<title>Re:It doesn't weigh anything</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258738440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>dude....that's heavy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>dude....that 's heavy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dude....that's heavy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179472</id>
	<title>No</title>
	<author>N7DR</author>
	<datestamp>1258720020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Ever wondered how much the internet physically weighs?</i></p><p>No.</p><p>And, oddly, even after someone else has asked the question, I still don't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ever wondered how much the internet physically weighs ? No.And , oddly , even after someone else has asked the question , I still do n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ever wondered how much the internet physically weighs?No.And, oddly, even after someone else has asked the question, I still don't.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179990</id>
	<title>kg?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258722660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This 'kg' concept means nothing to me. Tell me in a unit I can understand, like how many libraries of congress is it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This 'kg ' concept means nothing to me .
Tell me in a unit I can understand , like how many libraries of congress is it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This 'kg' concept means nothing to me.
Tell me in a unit I can understand, like how many libraries of congress is it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182110</id>
	<title>Sorry to ask but ...</title>
	<author>freaker\_TuC</author>
	<datestamp>1258740540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>how much is this in vw beetles exactly?<br>if that's impossible it's also possible to get it in library of congress units, that might be easier to remember..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>how much is this in vw beetles exactly ? if that 's impossible it 's also possible to get it in library of congress units , that might be easier to remember. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how much is this in vw beetles exactly?if that's impossible it's also possible to get it in library of congress units, that might be easier to remember..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179308</id>
	<title>Chevy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258719360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I KNOW I couldn't throw that on the back of a truck.<br> <br>

Seriously though this is the shit<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. has grown to despise on idle(why does it still exist?), how did it escape onto real<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I KNOW I could n't throw that on the back of a truck .
Seriously though this is the shit / .
has grown to despise on idle ( why does it still exist ?
) , how did it escape onto real / .
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I KNOW I couldn't throw that on the back of a truck.
Seriously though this is the shit /.
has grown to despise on idle(why does it still exist?
), how did it escape onto real /.
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30181556</id>
	<title>That picture...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258734660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is anyone else bothered by the fact they're clearly in the wrong order?</p><p>giraffe &gt; rhino &gt; elephant &gt; sparrow &gt; frog &gt; duck</p><p>when it should be</p><p>elephant &gt; rhino &gt; giraffe &gt; duck &gt; frog &gt; sparrow</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is anyone else bothered by the fact they 're clearly in the wrong order ? giraffe &gt; rhino &gt; elephant &gt; sparrow &gt; frog &gt; duckwhen it should beelephant &gt; rhino &gt; giraffe &gt; duck &gt; frog &gt; sparrow</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is anyone else bothered by the fact they're clearly in the wrong order?giraffe &gt; rhino &gt; elephant &gt; sparrow &gt; frog &gt; duckwhen it should beelephant &gt; rhino &gt; giraffe &gt; duck &gt; frog &gt; sparrow</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179818</id>
	<title>Re:Slightly heavier then...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258721760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey! Without useless journalists there'd be a lot less comedy. A world without the Daily Show or the Colbert Report would not be as fun. Both shows (and many mire) depend on the brainless idiots that present themselves as arbiters of 'truth'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey !
Without useless journalists there 'd be a lot less comedy .
A world without the Daily Show or the Colbert Report would not be as fun .
Both shows ( and many mire ) depend on the brainless idiots that present themselves as arbiters of 'truth' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey!
Without useless journalists there'd be a lot less comedy.
A world without the Daily Show or the Colbert Report would not be as fun.
Both shows (and many mire) depend on the brainless idiots that present themselves as arbiters of 'truth'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182012</id>
	<title>Re:Slightly heavier then...</title>
	<author>camperdave</author>
	<datestamp>1258739400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1cnJ\_pOAdQ" title="youtube.com">Seven ate Nine</a> [youtube.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seven ate Nine [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seven ate Nine [youtube.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179252</id>
	<title>Don't be silly.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258719180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The internet doesn't <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDbyYGrswtg&amp;feature=player\_embedded" title="youtube.com">weigh anything</a> [youtube.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The internet does n't weigh anything [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The internet doesn't weigh anything [youtube.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182764</id>
	<title>E=mc^2</title>
	<author>nerdyalien</author>
	<datestamp>1258795020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IMHO, Internet live, breathe on electricity and if no electricity, no Internet at all.</p><p>Hence it is worth to calculate its electricity usage (Energy usage, to be precise) on a given time (say a day), then plug into E=mc^2 to calculate the Mass.</p><p>what do you think?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IMHO , Internet live , breathe on electricity and if no electricity , no Internet at all.Hence it is worth to calculate its electricity usage ( Energy usage , to be precise ) on a given time ( say a day ) , then plug into E = mc ^ 2 to calculate the Mass.what do you think ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IMHO, Internet live, breathe on electricity and if no electricity, no Internet at all.Hence it is worth to calculate its electricity usage (Energy usage, to be precise) on a given time (say a day), then plug into E=mc^2 to calculate the Mass.what do you think?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179828</id>
	<title>and for</title>
	<author>rossdee</author>
	<datestamp>1258721820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The next stupid question:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; How long is the Internet?</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; How wide is the internet?</p><p>and then calculate the area of the internet using standard units like football fields, or states of texas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The next stupid question :     How long is the Internet ?
    How wide is the internet ? and then calculate the area of the internet using standard units like football fields , or states of texas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The next stupid question:
    How long is the Internet?
    How wide is the internet?and then calculate the area of the internet using standard units like football fields, or states of texas.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179522</id>
	<title>How heavy is the Internet</title>
	<author>Psychotria</author>
	<datestamp>1258720260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I don't know about you guys but I actually get asked this question quite often. Just the other day I was in a board meeting when my CEO turned to me and whispered in my ear "Do you know how heavy the internet is?" I didn't know the answer and ended up looking like a fool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I do n't know about you guys but I actually get asked this question quite often .
Just the other day I was in a board meeting when my CEO turned to me and whispered in my ear " Do you know how heavy the internet is ?
" I did n't know the answer and ended up looking like a fool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I don't know about you guys but I actually get asked this question quite often.
Just the other day I was in a board meeting when my CEO turned to me and whispered in my ear "Do you know how heavy the internet is?
" I didn't know the answer and ended up looking like a fool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179672</id>
	<title>It's a good thing..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258721100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is a good thing they didn't try to calculate the amount of power used and how much it adds to global warming..  They may decide to shut it down tomorrow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a good thing they did n't try to calculate the amount of power used and how much it adds to global warming.. They may decide to shut it down tomorrow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a good thing they didn't try to calculate the amount of power used and how much it adds to global warming..  They may decide to shut it down tomorrow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179864</id>
	<title>Not as heavy as its users!</title>
	<author>Snaller</author>
	<datestamp>1258722060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*thank you* *thank you*  - Don't forget to tip the waitress on the way out!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* thank you * * thank you * - Do n't forget to tip the waitress on the way out !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*thank you* *thank you*  - Don't forget to tip the waitress on the way out!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179364</id>
	<title>Something this heavy...</title>
	<author>Looce</author>
	<datestamp>1258719600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Something this heavy... must be slow, right? Slow like this <i>slow news day</i> maybe?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... What do you mean, it's constantly getting faster? Are you nuts?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Something this heavy... must be slow , right ?
Slow like this slow news day maybe ?
... What do you mean , it 's constantly getting faster ?
Are you nuts ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something this heavy... must be slow, right?
Slow like this slow news day maybe?
... What do you mean, it's constantly getting faster?
Are you nuts?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182376</id>
	<title>Re:It doesn't weigh anything</title>
	<author>Ralph Spoilsport</author>
	<datestamp>1258744800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It doesn't weigh anything, ever. It has its servant do that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't weigh anything , ever .
It has its servant do that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't weigh anything, ever.
It has its servant do that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180060</id>
	<title>Units</title>
	<author>spoonist</author>
	<datestamp>1258722960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can someone please convert this to some useful unit of measure like "Libraries of Congress"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can someone please convert this to some useful unit of measure like " Libraries of Congress " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can someone please convert this to some useful unit of measure like "Libraries of Congress"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179840</id>
	<title>The weight of a virus</title>
	<author>glwtta</author>
	<datestamp>1258721940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Um, what?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, what?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179766</id>
	<title>Based on this estimate</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1258721580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
The internet gained about 6 billion pounds after the release of Windows Vista, due to all the additional beefier systems needing to be purchased in place of older systems.
</p><p>
It's far time the Internet went on a diet.
</p><p>
Oh WTF is with the supposition that Viruses or web pages "weigh" something?
</p><p>
It's already factored in by the weight of the hard drives of internet connected PCs... actually, that counts free disk space too.
</p><p>
Technically.. the entire weight of the PC is not all attributable to the Internet.
</p><p>
For example, the weight of the internet has nothing to do with the weight of that extra-large display you happened to have installed so you could watch DVDs on your computer.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The internet gained about 6 billion pounds after the release of Windows Vista , due to all the additional beefier systems needing to be purchased in place of older systems .
It 's far time the Internet went on a diet .
Oh WTF is with the supposition that Viruses or web pages " weigh " something ?
It 's already factored in by the weight of the hard drives of internet connected PCs... actually , that counts free disk space too .
Technically.. the entire weight of the PC is not all attributable to the Internet .
For example , the weight of the internet has nothing to do with the weight of that extra-large display you happened to have installed so you could watch DVDs on your computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
The internet gained about 6 billion pounds after the release of Windows Vista, due to all the additional beefier systems needing to be purchased in place of older systems.
It's far time the Internet went on a diet.
Oh WTF is with the supposition that Viruses or web pages "weigh" something?
It's already factored in by the weight of the hard drives of internet connected PCs... actually, that counts free disk space too.
Technically.. the entire weight of the PC is not all attributable to the Internet.
For example, the weight of the internet has nothing to do with the weight of that extra-large display you happened to have installed so you could watch DVDs on your computer.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179742</id>
	<title>did they add E/c^2?</title>
	<author>Bazman</author>
	<datestamp>1258721460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>E = mc^2, hence m = E/c^2. How much energy is there in a running computer compared to one switched off? Convert to mass, multiply by the number of computers on the internet to get... well, yet another meaningless figure, but it might be fun to estimate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>E = mc ^ 2 , hence m = E/c ^ 2 .
How much energy is there in a running computer compared to one switched off ?
Convert to mass , multiply by the number of computers on the internet to get... well , yet another meaningless figure , but it might be fun to estimate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>E = mc^2, hence m = E/c^2.
How much energy is there in a running computer compared to one switched off?
Convert to mass, multiply by the number of computers on the internet to get... well, yet another meaningless figure, but it might be fun to estimate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179404</id>
	<title>What a useless question</title>
	<author>straponego</author>
	<datestamp>1258719780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I need to know how much of the internet is 1, and how much is 0.<br><br>I suppose I could get a start on that by running VMs of the most popular OSs, and examining snapshots of each one, multiplying that by... oh, and do the same with backbone traffic... be a bit of a pain to handle all the embedded stuff, but in principle... well, in principle, the internet could be represented as a single number.  I wonder if it's odd or even.  I guess it depends on who has the last bit.<br><br>Ooops, time to takes me pills again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I need to know how much of the internet is 1 , and how much is 0.I suppose I could get a start on that by running VMs of the most popular OSs , and examining snapshots of each one , multiplying that by... oh , and do the same with backbone traffic... be a bit of a pain to handle all the embedded stuff , but in principle... well , in principle , the internet could be represented as a single number .
I wonder if it 's odd or even .
I guess it depends on who has the last bit.Ooops , time to takes me pills again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I need to know how much of the internet is 1, and how much is 0.I suppose I could get a start on that by running VMs of the most popular OSs, and examining snapshots of each one, multiplying that by... oh, and do the same with backbone traffic... be a bit of a pain to handle all the embedded stuff, but in principle... well, in principle, the internet could be represented as a single number.
I wonder if it's odd or even.
I guess it depends on who has the last bit.Ooops, time to takes me pills again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180112</id>
	<title>Re:It doesn't weigh anything</title>
	<author>timmarhy</author>
	<datestamp>1258723320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>actually your wrong wrong WRONG. even if you only count the electrons and photons that make up the signals, they all have mass and hence the internet weighs something.</htmltext>
<tokenext>actually your wrong wrong WRONG .
even if you only count the electrons and photons that make up the signals , they all have mass and hence the internet weighs something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>actually your wrong wrong WRONG.
even if you only count the electrons and photons that make up the signals, they all have mass and hence the internet weighs something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180766</id>
	<title>Re:Slightly heavier then...</title>
	<author>ChefInnocent</author>
	<datestamp>1258727400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What do you mean 7 is a little aggressive?  It's the most aggressive number there is; it ate 9!  Poor little 6 is terrified of it.  1 is a bit cocky never being a looser.  2 is pretty passive; he'll go along with anything.  Not much to say about 3.  4 isn't really the aggressor, it's the person who shouts it that is aggressive....</htmltext>
<tokenext>What do you mean 7 is a little aggressive ?
It 's the most aggressive number there is ; it ate 9 !
Poor little 6 is terrified of it .
1 is a bit cocky never being a looser .
2 is pretty passive ; he 'll go along with anything .
Not much to say about 3 .
4 is n't really the aggressor , it 's the person who shouts it that is aggressive... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do you mean 7 is a little aggressive?
It's the most aggressive number there is; it ate 9!
Poor little 6 is terrified of it.
1 is a bit cocky never being a looser.
2 is pretty passive; he'll go along with anything.
Not much to say about 3.
4 isn't really the aggressor, it's the person who shouts it that is aggressive....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30184492</id>
	<title>Good to know, but...</title>
	<author>xactuary</author>
	<datestamp>1258820940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Will it blend?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it blend ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it blend?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182944</id>
	<title>Re:The internet has no weight...</title>
	<author>Richard\_J\_N</author>
	<datestamp>1258799040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, data = information = entropy. What's the minimum amount of energy required (in theory) to store a single bit of data?<br>It's probably not zero. Therefore data does actually have energy, i.e. mass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , data = information = entropy .
What 's the minimum amount of energy required ( in theory ) to store a single bit of data ? It 's probably not zero .
Therefore data does actually have energy , i.e .
mass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, data = information = entropy.
What's the minimum amount of energy required (in theory) to store a single bit of data?It's probably not zero.
Therefore data does actually have energy, i.e.
mass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30181450</id>
	<title>Re: That's like asking "how red is 7?"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258733460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Alizarin crimson<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...Donovan</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Alizarin crimson ...Donovan</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alizarin crimson ...Donovan</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180032</id>
	<title>nigg4a</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258722840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>nearly two years megs ofq ram runs</htmltext>
<tokenext>nearly two years megs ofq ram runs</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nearly two years megs ofq ram runs</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179826</id>
	<title>CNET exists to serve ads</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258721820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to boring house-parents who think they know how to setup their wireless router.  I hate them so much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>to boring house-parents who think they know how to setup their wireless router .
I hate them so much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to boring house-parents who think they know how to setup their wireless router.
I hate them so much.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30183138</id>
	<title>Dude,</title>
	<author>carpefishus</author>
	<datestamp>1258802520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's heavy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's heavy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's heavy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30184202</id>
	<title>and i thought...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258818660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and here i thought we'd get some nice map on the overhead of cables, or something like that...<br>sigh...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and here i thought we 'd get some nice map on the overhead of cables , or something like that...sigh.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and here i thought we'd get some nice map on the overhead of cables, or something like that...sigh...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218</id>
	<title>Slightly heavier then...</title>
	<author>Anachragnome</author>
	<datestamp>1258719060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"How Heavy Is the Internet?"</p><p>Slightly heavier then the total weight of the worlds useless journalists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" How Heavy Is the Internet ?
" Slightly heavier then the total weight of the worlds useless journalists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How Heavy Is the Internet?
"Slightly heavier then the total weight of the worlds useless journalists.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182374</id>
	<title>weight of things</title>
	<author>JumpSocial</author>
	<datestamp>1258744740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How heavy is religion?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How heavy is religion ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How heavy is religion?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179362</id>
	<title>When I saw the headline</title>
	<author>EkriirkE</author>
	<datestamp>1258719600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I saw the headline I was expecting kdawson's name attached.  For shame.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I saw the headline I was expecting kdawson 's name attached .
For shame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I saw the headline I was expecting kdawson's name attached.
For shame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179684</id>
	<title>are they counting stupid stuff on monitors</title>
	<author>swschrad</author>
	<datestamp>1258721160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>like the Dogberts and "beatings will continue" buttons and mirrors to see the boss coming up behind you?</p><p>add another 300,000 Kg at least.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>like the Dogberts and " beatings will continue " buttons and mirrors to see the boss coming up behind you ? add another 300,000 Kg at least .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>like the Dogberts and "beatings will continue" buttons and mirrors to see the boss coming up behind you?add another 300,000 Kg at least.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30181656</id>
	<title>Re:Slightly heavier then...</title>
	<author>CrtxReavr</author>
	<datestamp>1258735560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fucked-up metric indeed. . . it weighs kilograms?  Idiots.</p><p>-CR</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fucked-up metric indeed .
. .
it weighs kilograms ?
Idiots.-CR</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fucked-up metric indeed.
. .
it weighs kilograms?
Idiots.-CR</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180316</id>
	<title>Re:Slightly heavier then...</title>
	<author>LowlyWorm</author>
	<datestamp>1258724400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is strange you should say that. Since I was in grade school I always personally assigned individual personalities to the digits 1-9. I know of no one else who does this. Just a personal quirk I guess. 7 is a little aggressive but not as much so as 4 or 8.  I don't know about the color of numbers or personalities of fruit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is strange you should say that .
Since I was in grade school I always personally assigned individual personalities to the digits 1-9 .
I know of no one else who does this .
Just a personal quirk I guess .
7 is a little aggressive but not as much so as 4 or 8 .
I do n't know about the color of numbers or personalities of fruit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is strange you should say that.
Since I was in grade school I always personally assigned individual personalities to the digits 1-9.
I know of no one else who does this.
Just a personal quirk I guess.
7 is a little aggressive but not as much so as 4 or 8.
I don't know about the color of numbers or personalities of fruit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179426</id>
	<title>hey don't joke about this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258719900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>its a systems of tubes I tell you. it's a system of tubes that already weighs half a billion tonnes so dont add more</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>its a systems of tubes I tell you .
it 's a system of tubes that already weighs half a billion tonnes so dont add more</tokentext>
<sentencetext>its a systems of tubes I tell you.
it's a system of tubes that already weighs half a billion tonnes so dont add more</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182714</id>
	<title>Use metric prefices: about half a petagram</title>
	<author>erlkonig</author>
	<datestamp>1258794060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Geez, use metric already:</p><p>labrat@yggdrasil:~$ units<br>2411 units, 71 prefixes, 33 nonlinear units<br>You have: 498438559990 kilograms<br>You want: petagrams<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * 0.49843856<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; / 2.0062653</p><p>1/2 petagram.  Easy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Geez , use metric already : labrat @ yggdrasil : ~ $ units2411 units , 71 prefixes , 33 nonlinear unitsYou have : 498438559990 kilogramsYou want : petagrams         * 0.49843856         / 2.00626531/2 petagram .
Easy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geez, use metric already:labrat@yggdrasil:~$ units2411 units, 71 prefixes, 33 nonlinear unitsYou have: 498438559990 kilogramsYou want: petagrams
        * 0.49843856
        / 2.00626531/2 petagram.
Easy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180684</id>
	<title>useful?</title>
	<author>myVarNamesAreTooLon</author>
	<datestamp>1258726860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Obviously this information is only really useful to someone attempting to work out the cost of posting the Internet somewhere</p></div><p>...and this would be useful? Ever?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously this information is only really useful to someone attempting to work out the cost of posting the Internet somewhere...and this would be useful ?
Ever ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously this information is only really useful to someone attempting to work out the cost of posting the Internet somewhere...and this would be useful?
Ever?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180232</id>
	<title>The internet has no weight...</title>
	<author>eepok</author>
	<datestamp>1258723980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The internet is a mass of data interconnected by address. Data is not an object, but the status of variables. Data has no more weight than any other abstract concept.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The internet is a mass of data interconnected by address .
Data is not an object , but the status of variables .
Data has no more weight than any other abstract concept .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The internet is a mass of data interconnected by address.
Data is not an object, but the status of variables.
Data has no more weight than any other abstract concept.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179402</id>
	<title>A wise man once told me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258719780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Never underestimate the throughput of a mac truck full of hard drives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never underestimate the throughput of a mac truck full of hard drives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never underestimate the throughput of a mac truck full of hard drives.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180156</id>
	<title>Re:Don't be silly.</title>
	<author>DeadRat4life</author>
	<datestamp>1258723620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>First thing i thought of when i saw this.
Best show ever. Wish we could get it in the states.</htmltext>
<tokenext>First thing i thought of when i saw this .
Best show ever .
Wish we could get it in the states .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First thing i thought of when i saw this.
Best show ever.
Wish we could get it in the states.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182578</id>
	<title>Re:Slightly heavier then...</title>
	<author>yRabbit</author>
	<datestamp>1258834620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe you have synesthesia. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synesthesia#Personification" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synesthesia#Personification</a> [wikipedia.org] , one of many types of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe you have synesthesia .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synesthesia # Personification [ wikipedia.org ] , one of many types of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe you have synesthesia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synesthesia#Personification [wikipedia.org] , one of many types of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179754</id>
	<title>Usenet was RIGHT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258721520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ATTENTION: By posting this to Slashdot you will add electrons to numerous computers all over the world, adding hundreds if not thousands of pounds to the Internet.</p><p>Are you sure you want to continue?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ATTENTION : By posting this to Slashdot you will add electrons to numerous computers all over the world , adding hundreds if not thousands of pounds to the Internet.Are you sure you want to continue ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ATTENTION: By posting this to Slashdot you will add electrons to numerous computers all over the world, adding hundreds if not thousands of pounds to the Internet.Are you sure you want to continue?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30185190</id>
	<title>Re:Made me wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258824960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And the Calculus says, since weight is a vector quantity, that the Earth in its own reference frame weighs zero. Everything cancels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the Calculus says , since weight is a vector quantity , that the Earth in its own reference frame weighs zero .
Everything cancels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the Calculus says, since weight is a vector quantity, that the Earth in its own reference frame weighs zero.
Everything cancels.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179454</id>
	<title>Your Internet</title>
	<author>Reason58</author>
	<datestamp>1258719960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yo internet's so fat the only time it sees 90210 is on the scale.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yo internet 's so fat the only time it sees 90210 is on the scale .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yo internet's so fat the only time it sees 90210 is on the scale.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182242</id>
	<title>Negative "weight"</title>
	<author>tombeard</author>
	<datestamp>1258742880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I don't know about the "internet", but the www has a positive buoyancy at earth normal pressure, due to the huge amount of hydrogen generated by the flatulence of most of the posts, such as this one. And really, how many web pages have you seen that were actually just crap? ; it all adds up. I say it is floating up in the ozone layer and blocking enough solar radiation to counteract global warming due to data center cooling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I do n't know about the " internet " , but the www has a positive buoyancy at earth normal pressure , due to the huge amount of hydrogen generated by the flatulence of most of the posts , such as this one .
And really , how many web pages have you seen that were actually just crap ?
; it all adds up .
I say it is floating up in the ozone layer and blocking enough solar radiation to counteract global warming due to data center cooling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I don't know about the "internet", but the www has a positive buoyancy at earth normal pressure, due to the huge amount of hydrogen generated by the flatulence of most of the posts, such as this one.
And really, how many web pages have you seen that were actually just crap?
; it all adds up.
I say it is floating up in the ozone layer and blocking enough solar radiation to counteract global warming due to data center cooling.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179272</id>
	<title>Re:It doesn't weigh anything</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258719240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It has come to my attention that you are an enormous faggot.</p><p> <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">yes</a> [goatse.fr] </p><p> <b>GNAA REBORN UNDER NEW LEADERSHIP</b> </p><p> <i>DiKKy Heartiez - Berlin, Norway </i> </p><p>President timecop of the GNAA has died today. He died at the age of 55 from excessive lulz in his apartment in Tokyo, Japan while watching faggot cartoons of preteen girls beeing raped by giant testicles. The world will remember him as a total faggot douchebag who had the opportunity to unite the best trolls seen upon the face of the internet into one special hardcore machine of destruction, unfortunately he failed, instead devoting his internet carreer to animu. Although he died like a true hero he will be forever remembered as a total failure. </p><p>In the wake of his death the GNAA is thought to perish like all the other so called trolling organizations. The writing is on the wall, they say. The GNAA smells worse than BSD, they say.They have said this for a long time. The GNAA has lived, with a very faint pulse, for years. </p><p> <b> DIKKY HEARTIEZ CLAIMS THE PRESIDENCY OF THE GNAA!!!!!!!</b> </p><p>With the death of timecop still shocking our chats, not many are able to see ahead. But there is one visionary Nord who has great plans for the new GNAA.<br>"Under my leadership the GNAA will become the new home of all trolls on the internet. The GNAA will regain its old strength and will be feared by bloggers and jews alike. The time for CHANGE is now." DiKky HearTiez told a shocked audience outside the Gary Niger Memorial Plaza, Nigeria, earlier today. The GNAA will move its Internet Relayed Communications to a new location, following reports of a massive "Distributed Denial Of Service" attack on its previous location, making it unreliable.<br>"Our operatives are in need of a robust and safe communications service with can\_flood for everyone." An anonymous source at the GNAA Black Ops department told reporters at the same conference.</p><p> <b>KLULZ supports DiKKy Heartiez presidency!</b> </p><p>The infamous KLULZ internet radio station supports DiKKy Heartiez for the new GNAA president.<br>"KLULZ is behind him 100\% and will be broadcasting his speeches and support him in every way possible, we wish him the best of luck and an outstanding presidency. May many blogs burn under DiKky Hearties." This was stated by KLULZ Operations Manager and Gay Nigger g0sp when asked to comment on KLULZ involvement.</p><p> <b>About President timecop</b> </p><p>DEAD.</p><p> <b>About DiKKy HearTiez </b> </p><p>The world famous internet nord from Norway LOL HY living in a fjord LOL HY. Currently the new President of the new GNAA. He is also a radiodj on KLULZ and active in many irc chats. Known for several epic trolls in his time. Led the GNAA operation Intel Crapflood 21, who succesfully made GNAA owners of the biggest thread on Slashdot until fixed by admins. Also deeply involved in the war on blogs, and is the one who provided JesuitX with the real screenshots of Faggintosh Leopard. His leadership abilities, high iq and instoppable urge to troll, coupled with his fat Norwegian welfare check will enable him to become the best President the GNAA ever had.</p><p> <b>About KLULZ</b> </p><p>KLULZ is the internets radio station, bringing you news about the GNAA, hosting shows by prominent djs such as DiKKy, l0de, g0sp, jenk and many others. KLULZ supports DiKKy Heartiez. With mature content this channel is not suitable for children or people under the age of 18. Klulz radio can be heard at http://klulz.com/listen.pls</p><p> <b>About GNAA</b>:</p><p> <b>GNAA</b> (<i>GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA</i>) is the first<br>organization which gathers GAY NIGGERS from all over America and abroad for one<br>common goal - being GAY NIGGERS.</p><p>Are you <a href="http://klerck.org/spin.gif" title="klerck.org" rel="nofollow"> <b>GAY</b> </a> [klerck.org]?</p><p>Are you a <a href="http://www.mugshots.org/sports/oj-simpson.jpg" title="mugshots.org" rel="nofollow"> <b>NIGGER</b> </a> [mugshots.org]?</p><p>Are you a <a href="http://www.gay-sex-access.com/gay-black-sex.jpg" title="gay-sex-access.com" rel="nofollow"> <b>GAY NIGGER</b> </a> [gay-sex-access.com]?</p><p>If you answered "Yes" to all of the above qu</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It has come to my attention that you are an enormous faggot .
yes [ goatse.fr ] GNAA REBORN UNDER NEW LEADERSHIP DiKKy Heartiez - Berlin , Norway President timecop of the GNAA has died today .
He died at the age of 55 from excessive lulz in his apartment in Tokyo , Japan while watching faggot cartoons of preteen girls beeing raped by giant testicles .
The world will remember him as a total faggot douchebag who had the opportunity to unite the best trolls seen upon the face of the internet into one special hardcore machine of destruction , unfortunately he failed , instead devoting his internet carreer to animu .
Although he died like a true hero he will be forever remembered as a total failure .
In the wake of his death the GNAA is thought to perish like all the other so called trolling organizations .
The writing is on the wall , they say .
The GNAA smells worse than BSD , they say.They have said this for a long time .
The GNAA has lived , with a very faint pulse , for years .
DIKKY HEARTIEZ CLAIMS THE PRESIDENCY OF THE GNAA ! ! ! ! ! ! !
With the death of timecop still shocking our chats , not many are able to see ahead .
But there is one visionary Nord who has great plans for the new GNAA .
" Under my leadership the GNAA will become the new home of all trolls on the internet .
The GNAA will regain its old strength and will be feared by bloggers and jews alike .
The time for CHANGE is now .
" DiKky HearTiez told a shocked audience outside the Gary Niger Memorial Plaza , Nigeria , earlier today .
The GNAA will move its Internet Relayed Communications to a new location , following reports of a massive " Distributed Denial Of Service " attack on its previous location , making it unreliable .
" Our operatives are in need of a robust and safe communications service with can \ _flood for everyone .
" An anonymous source at the GNAA Black Ops department told reporters at the same conference .
KLULZ supports DiKKy Heartiez presidency !
The infamous KLULZ internet radio station supports DiKKy Heartiez for the new GNAA president .
" KLULZ is behind him 100 \ % and will be broadcasting his speeches and support him in every way possible , we wish him the best of luck and an outstanding presidency .
May many blogs burn under DiKky Hearties .
" This was stated by KLULZ Operations Manager and Gay Nigger g0sp when asked to comment on KLULZ involvement .
About President timecop DEAD .
About DiKKy HearTiez The world famous internet nord from Norway LOL HY living in a fjord LOL HY .
Currently the new President of the new GNAA .
He is also a radiodj on KLULZ and active in many irc chats .
Known for several epic trolls in his time .
Led the GNAA operation Intel Crapflood 21 , who succesfully made GNAA owners of the biggest thread on Slashdot until fixed by admins .
Also deeply involved in the war on blogs , and is the one who provided JesuitX with the real screenshots of Faggintosh Leopard .
His leadership abilities , high iq and instoppable urge to troll , coupled with his fat Norwegian welfare check will enable him to become the best President the GNAA ever had .
About KLULZ KLULZ is the internets radio station , bringing you news about the GNAA , hosting shows by prominent djs such as DiKKy , l0de , g0sp , jenk and many others .
KLULZ supports DiKKy Heartiez .
With mature content this channel is not suitable for children or people under the age of 18 .
Klulz radio can be heard at http : //klulz.com/listen.pls About GNAA : GNAA ( GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ) is the firstorganization which gathers GAY NIGGERS from all over America and abroad for onecommon goal - being GAY NIGGERS.Are you GAY [ klerck.org ] ? Are you a NIGGER [ mugshots.org ] ? Are you a GAY NIGGER [ gay-sex-access.com ] ? If you answered " Yes " to all of the above qu</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has come to my attention that you are an enormous faggot.
yes [goatse.fr]  GNAA REBORN UNDER NEW LEADERSHIP  DiKKy Heartiez - Berlin, Norway  President timecop of the GNAA has died today.
He died at the age of 55 from excessive lulz in his apartment in Tokyo, Japan while watching faggot cartoons of preteen girls beeing raped by giant testicles.
The world will remember him as a total faggot douchebag who had the opportunity to unite the best trolls seen upon the face of the internet into one special hardcore machine of destruction, unfortunately he failed, instead devoting his internet carreer to animu.
Although he died like a true hero he will be forever remembered as a total failure.
In the wake of his death the GNAA is thought to perish like all the other so called trolling organizations.
The writing is on the wall, they say.
The GNAA smells worse than BSD, they say.They have said this for a long time.
The GNAA has lived, with a very faint pulse, for years.
DIKKY HEARTIEZ CLAIMS THE PRESIDENCY OF THE GNAA!!!!!!!
With the death of timecop still shocking our chats, not many are able to see ahead.
But there is one visionary Nord who has great plans for the new GNAA.
"Under my leadership the GNAA will become the new home of all trolls on the internet.
The GNAA will regain its old strength and will be feared by bloggers and jews alike.
The time for CHANGE is now.
" DiKky HearTiez told a shocked audience outside the Gary Niger Memorial Plaza, Nigeria, earlier today.
The GNAA will move its Internet Relayed Communications to a new location, following reports of a massive "Distributed Denial Of Service" attack on its previous location, making it unreliable.
"Our operatives are in need of a robust and safe communications service with can\_flood for everyone.
" An anonymous source at the GNAA Black Ops department told reporters at the same conference.
KLULZ supports DiKKy Heartiez presidency!
The infamous KLULZ internet radio station supports DiKKy Heartiez for the new GNAA president.
"KLULZ is behind him 100\% and will be broadcasting his speeches and support him in every way possible, we wish him the best of luck and an outstanding presidency.
May many blogs burn under DiKky Hearties.
" This was stated by KLULZ Operations Manager and Gay Nigger g0sp when asked to comment on KLULZ involvement.
About President timecop DEAD.
About DiKKy HearTiez  The world famous internet nord from Norway LOL HY living in a fjord LOL HY.
Currently the new President of the new GNAA.
He is also a radiodj on KLULZ and active in many irc chats.
Known for several epic trolls in his time.
Led the GNAA operation Intel Crapflood 21, who succesfully made GNAA owners of the biggest thread on Slashdot until fixed by admins.
Also deeply involved in the war on blogs, and is the one who provided JesuitX with the real screenshots of Faggintosh Leopard.
His leadership abilities, high iq and instoppable urge to troll, coupled with his fat Norwegian welfare check will enable him to become the best President the GNAA ever had.
About KLULZ KLULZ is the internets radio station, bringing you news about the GNAA, hosting shows by prominent djs such as DiKKy, l0de, g0sp, jenk and many others.
KLULZ supports DiKKy Heartiez.
With mature content this channel is not suitable for children or people under the age of 18.
Klulz radio can be heard at http://klulz.com/listen.pls About GNAA: GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the firstorganization which gathers GAY NIGGERS from all over America and abroad for onecommon goal - being GAY NIGGERS.Are you  GAY  [klerck.org]?Are you a  NIGGER  [mugshots.org]?Are you a  GAY NIGGER  [gay-sex-access.com]?If you answered "Yes" to all of the above qu</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30183648</id>
	<title>Re:idleispants</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1258812120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And if it's a wikipedia, digg, slashdot, or other popular server, then you need to multiply.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And if it 's a wikipedia , digg , slashdot , or other popular server , then you need to multiply .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if it's a wikipedia, digg, slashdot, or other popular server, then you need to multiply.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179458</id>
	<title>Re:Slightly heavier then...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258720020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What a fucked up metric.  That's like asking "how red is 7?" or "what's the personality of a grapefruit?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What a fucked up metric .
That 's like asking " how red is 7 ?
" or " what 's the personality of a grapefruit ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a fucked up metric.
That's like asking "how red is 7?
" or "what's the personality of a grapefruit?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179294</id>
	<title>They forgot....</title>
	<author>ArcadeNut</author>
	<datestamp>1258719360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To add the weight of all the Tubes and Dump Trucks!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To add the weight of all the Tubes and Dump Trucks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To add the weight of all the Tubes and Dump Trucks!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179614</id>
	<title>What about the colos?</title>
	<author>linuxwrangler</author>
	<datestamp>1258720740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given their methodology, you'd better add the weight of all the colocation facilities. That's a heap of concrete, lead-acid batteries, flywheels, generators, steel supports and cabinets, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given their methodology , you 'd better add the weight of all the colocation facilities .
That 's a heap of concrete , lead-acid batteries , flywheels , generators , steel supports and cabinets , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given their methodology, you'd better add the weight of all the colocation facilities.
That's a heap of concrete, lead-acid batteries, flywheels, generators, steel supports and cabinets, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30181388</id>
	<title>Gentry wants to know...</title>
	<author>jeko</author>
	<datestamp>1258732620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...if they've discovered its shape yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...if they 've discovered its shape yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...if they've discovered its shape yet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180656</id>
	<title>Re:Slightly heavier then...</title>
	<author>RobDollar</author>
	<datestamp>1258726500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kudos to you good sir.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kudos to you good sir .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kudos to you good sir.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179374</id>
	<title>That number needs updating.</title>
	<author>JustNiz</author>
	<datestamp>1258719660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've just removed the watercooling system on my PC so the internet weighs 10KG less now.<br>So its exactly 498,438,559,980kg now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've just removed the watercooling system on my PC so the internet weighs 10KG less now.So its exactly 498,438,559,980kg now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've just removed the watercooling system on my PC so the internet weighs 10KG less now.So its exactly 498,438,559,980kg now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179206</id>
	<title>OOOPS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258719000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just typed something, and made it heavier than that!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just typed something , and made it heavier than that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just typed something, and made it heavier than that!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179686</id>
	<title>Re:Slightly heavier then...</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1258721160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What a fucked up metric. That's like asking "how red is 7?" or "what's the personality of a grapefruit?"</p></div><p>Your momma is so fat, her circumference is 3.1415 internets.<br>/idleispants</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What a fucked up metric .
That 's like asking " how red is 7 ?
" or " what 's the personality of a grapefruit ?
" Your momma is so fat , her circumference is 3.1415 internets./idleispants</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a fucked up metric.
That's like asking "how red is 7?
" or "what's the personality of a grapefruit?
"Your momma is so fat, her circumference is 3.1415 internets./idleispants
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180682</id>
	<title>How Much?</title>
	<author>cacepi</author>
	<datestamp>1258726860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>498,438,559,990KG? What does that convert to in tubes?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>498,438,559,990KG ?
What does that convert to in tubes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>498,438,559,990KG?
What does that convert to in tubes?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179560</id>
	<title>Amazing precision</title>
	<author>uberdilligaff</author>
	<datestamp>1258720500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really exceptional that they managed to measure the weight to 11 significant figures -- 12 if that last zero wasn't from rounding.  A tribute to CNET's diligence.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really exceptional that they managed to measure the weight to 11 significant figures -- 12 if that last zero was n't from rounding .
A tribute to CNET 's diligence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really exceptional that they managed to measure the weight to 11 significant figures -- 12 if that last zero wasn't from rounding.
A tribute to CNET's diligence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182674</id>
	<title>Re:The internet has no weight...</title>
	<author>V50</author>
	<datestamp>1258836780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The internet is a mass of data interconnected by address. Data is not an object, but the status of variables. Data has no more weight than any other abstract concept.</p></div><p>WHAT!? I thought the internet was a series of tubes.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-/</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The internet is a mass of data interconnected by address .
Data is not an object , but the status of variables .
Data has no more weight than any other abstract concept.WHAT ! ?
I thought the internet was a series of tubes .
: -/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The internet is a mass of data interconnected by address.
Data is not an object, but the status of variables.
Data has no more weight than any other abstract concept.WHAT!?
I thought the internet was a series of tubes.
:-/
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180762</id>
	<title>498,438,559,990kg??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258727340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's a very precise figure for something that's just a rough estimate!</p><p>Surely "around 500,000,000 tonnes" is a better way to put it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a very precise figure for something that 's just a rough estimate ! Surely " around 500,000,000 tonnes " is a better way to put it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a very precise figure for something that's just a rough estimate!Surely "around 500,000,000 tonnes" is a better way to put it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179302</id>
	<title>Rosie O'Donnell still has it beat.</title>
	<author>GPLDAN</author>
	<datestamp>1258719360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>BOOM! POWZA!</htmltext>
<tokenext>BOOM !
POWZA !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BOOM!
POWZA!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30181432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30185190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30183238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30186768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30200914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30181926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182578
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30183926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30181450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30183378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30199762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30181656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30183974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30190698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30183648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_170212_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179614
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179458
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180504
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30181656
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179686
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30183974
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179914
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30181450
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180316
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182012
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182578
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180766
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30183926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30183238
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179766
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179344
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182714
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179308
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179540
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30199762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182392
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30181432
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180156
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179270
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30183648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30186768
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179522
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180232
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182944
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180294
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179840
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30185190
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179224
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30181926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182376
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30200914
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179402
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30183378
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179502
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30179374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30190698
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_170212.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30180060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_170212.30182766
</commentlist>
</conversation>
