<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_19_2313216</id>
	<title>Intel Says Brain Implants Could Control Computers By 2020</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1258629120000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Lucas123 writes <i>"Scientists at Intel are working on <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9141180/Intel\_Chips\_in\_brains\_will\_control\_computers\_by\_2020">developing sensors that would be implanted</a> in a person's head in order to harness brain waves that could then be used to control computers, televisions, cell phones and other electronic equipment. Intel has already used Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (FMRI) machines to determine that blood flow changes in specific areas of the brain based on what word or image someone is thinking of. People tend to show the same brain patterns for similar thoughts. 'Eventually people may be willing to be more committed ... to brain implants. Imagine being able to surf the Web with the power of your thoughts.' said Intel research scientist Dean Pomerleau."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lucas123 writes " Scientists at Intel are working on developing sensors that would be implanted in a person 's head in order to harness brain waves that could then be used to control computers , televisions , cell phones and other electronic equipment .
Intel has already used Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging ( FMRI ) machines to determine that blood flow changes in specific areas of the brain based on what word or image someone is thinking of .
People tend to show the same brain patterns for similar thoughts .
'Eventually people may be willing to be more committed ... to brain implants .
Imagine being able to surf the Web with the power of your thoughts .
' said Intel research scientist Dean Pomerleau .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lucas123 writes "Scientists at Intel are working on developing sensors that would be implanted in a person's head in order to harness brain waves that could then be used to control computers, televisions, cell phones and other electronic equipment.
Intel has already used Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (FMRI) machines to determine that blood flow changes in specific areas of the brain based on what word or image someone is thinking of.
People tend to show the same brain patterns for similar thoughts.
'Eventually people may be willing to be more committed ... to brain implants.
Imagine being able to surf the Web with the power of your thoughts.
' said Intel research scientist Dean Pomerleau.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166126</id>
	<title>Mind/Machine Interface</title>
	<author>SMACX guy</author>
	<datestamp>1258635240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Warrior's bland acronym, MMI, obscures the true horror of this monstrosity. Its inventors promise a new era of genius, but
meanwhile unscrupulous power brokers use its forcible installation to violate the sanctity of unwilling human minds. They are
creating their own private army of demons.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Warrior 's bland acronym , MMI , obscures the true horror of this monstrosity .
Its inventors promise a new era of genius , but meanwhile unscrupulous power brokers use its forcible installation to violate the sanctity of unwilling human minds .
They are creating their own private army of demons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Warrior's bland acronym, MMI, obscures the true horror of this monstrosity.
Its inventors promise a new era of genius, but
meanwhile unscrupulous power brokers use its forcible installation to violate the sanctity of unwilling human minds.
They are
creating their own private army of demons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167504</id>
	<title>Movie comes ture</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258645200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Circuitry Man" the movie come true! LOL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Circuitry Man " the movie come true !
LOL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Circuitry Man" the movie come true!
LOL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167032</id>
	<title>Re: Why implants?</title>
	<author>WiseWeasel</author>
	<datestamp>1258640520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Personally, I predict that pre-speech recognition will be about as far as most people will be comfortable interfacing with their brains; at least you can somewhat control your pre-speech. Direct and comprehensive neural activity scanning raises much more privacy concerns, as much of it is involuntary, and it can yield much more personal information than semi-controlled (with training) pre-speech.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally , I predict that pre-speech recognition will be about as far as most people will be comfortable interfacing with their brains ; at least you can somewhat control your pre-speech .
Direct and comprehensive neural activity scanning raises much more privacy concerns , as much of it is involuntary , and it can yield much more personal information than semi-controlled ( with training ) pre-speech .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally, I predict that pre-speech recognition will be about as far as most people will be comfortable interfacing with their brains; at least you can somewhat control your pre-speech.
Direct and comprehensive neural activity scanning raises much more privacy concerns, as much of it is involuntary, and it can yield much more personal information than semi-controlled (with training) pre-speech.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169178</id>
	<title>Commodore 64 in my brain?</title>
	<author>Katchu</author>
	<datestamp>1258712160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This had better be modular and upgradable. Five years after an implant in my BRAIN I'd want the LATEST technology, not the old, obsolete junk.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This had better be modular and upgradable .
Five years after an implant in my BRAIN I 'd want the LATEST technology , not the old , obsolete junk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This had better be modular and upgradable.
Five years after an implant in my BRAIN I'd want the LATEST technology, not the old, obsolete junk.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165720</id>
	<title>"I'm a Mac...</title>
	<author>gdog05</author>
	<datestamp>1258633380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>And I have computers that control brain implants."

"I'm a PC, and I have brain implants that control a computer."

Mac: "Good Luck with that."</htmltext>
<tokenext>And I have computers that control brain implants .
" " I 'm a PC , and I have brain implants that control a computer .
" Mac : " Good Luck with that .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I have computers that control brain implants.
"

"I'm a PC, and I have brain implants that control a computer.
"

Mac: "Good Luck with that.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166216</id>
	<title>Will it run windows?</title>
	<author>localoptimum</author>
	<datestamp>1258635660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously, this is a great idea.  Only teenagers would agree to such a ridiculous implant, and you could rootkit the bastards and zap them when they piss on your car on a Friday night.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , this is a great idea .
Only teenagers would agree to such a ridiculous implant , and you could rootkit the bastards and zap them when they piss on your car on a Friday night .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, this is a great idea.
Only teenagers would agree to such a ridiculous implant, and you could rootkit the bastards and zap them when they piss on your car on a Friday night.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167292</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sick of being underestimated</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258642800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>since the common man surfs the web. But if you can input text to a computer by thinking, sign me up and give me a head mounted display<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:}</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>since the common man surfs the web .
But if you can input text to a computer by thinking , sign me up and give me a head mounted display : }</tokentext>
<sentencetext>since the common man surfs the web.
But if you can input text to a computer by thinking, sign me up and give me a head mounted display :}</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166308</id>
	<title>Consider the benefits...</title>
	<author>tx\_derf</author>
	<datestamp>1258636140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I really don't want to have an implant in my head for people to "keylog" or pop up spam, et al.

However, this could really benefit medical science by giving the physically disabled a means to work computers more easily.  Not only that but this technology can be used in medical science.  One could control a prosthesis or other equipment with much greater control.  Accident victims and soldiers who have lost limbs may even be able to regain near 100\% function, even with something as intricate as a working hand.  People with debilitating diseases or conditions, Stephen Hawking comes to mind, would be able to enjoy much more independence with the right equipment being driven by their still very capable mind.

While the potential for abuse exists and must be guarded against, I see the potential benefits making this technology worth pursuing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really do n't want to have an implant in my head for people to " keylog " or pop up spam , et al .
However , this could really benefit medical science by giving the physically disabled a means to work computers more easily .
Not only that but this technology can be used in medical science .
One could control a prosthesis or other equipment with much greater control .
Accident victims and soldiers who have lost limbs may even be able to regain near 100 \ % function , even with something as intricate as a working hand .
People with debilitating diseases or conditions , Stephen Hawking comes to mind , would be able to enjoy much more independence with the right equipment being driven by their still very capable mind .
While the potential for abuse exists and must be guarded against , I see the potential benefits making this technology worth pursuing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really don't want to have an implant in my head for people to "keylog" or pop up spam, et al.
However, this could really benefit medical science by giving the physically disabled a means to work computers more easily.
Not only that but this technology can be used in medical science.
One could control a prosthesis or other equipment with much greater control.
Accident victims and soldiers who have lost limbs may even be able to regain near 100\% function, even with something as intricate as a working hand.
People with debilitating diseases or conditions, Stephen Hawking comes to mind, would be able to enjoy much more independence with the right equipment being driven by their still very capable mind.
While the potential for abuse exists and must be guarded against, I see the potential benefits making this technology worth pursuing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166988</id>
	<title>Re:I call</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258640220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When we installed neurons in lab rats we used hammered silver electodes. Silver is a good conductor and anti-bacterial.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When we installed neurons in lab rats we used hammered silver electodes .
Silver is a good conductor and anti-bacterial .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When we installed neurons in lab rats we used hammered silver electodes.
Silver is a good conductor and anti-bacterial.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169308</id>
	<title>Re:Last Thing I Want</title>
	<author>Krneki</author>
	<datestamp>1258713720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>is someone trying to figure out a way to get advertising into my mind. We all know someone is going to try.</p><p>Fortunately, feeding input directly into the brain is more difficult that reading output from it.</p></div><p>Just install Adblock Plus brain plugin.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>is someone trying to figure out a way to get advertising into my mind .
We all know someone is going to try.Fortunately , feeding input directly into the brain is more difficult that reading output from it.Just install Adblock Plus brain plugin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is someone trying to figure out a way to get advertising into my mind.
We all know someone is going to try.Fortunately, feeding input directly into the brain is more difficult that reading output from it.Just install Adblock Plus brain plugin.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168120</id>
	<title>Bre.... ho brain!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258652340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Breast implants controlling computers?.... errrr... nervermind &gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Breast implants controlling computers ? ... .
errrr... nervermind &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Breast implants controlling computers?....
errrr... nervermind &gt;</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166030</id>
	<title>Re:Ghost in the Shell! FTW!</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1258634880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i/o is still a long way off. This is only computer input mechanisms. One way, man to machine. Machine can't alter man yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i/o is still a long way off .
This is only computer input mechanisms .
One way , man to machine .
Machine ca n't alter man yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i/o is still a long way off.
This is only computer input mechanisms.
One way, man to machine.
Machine can't alter man yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30170392</id>
	<title>...  harness brain waves?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258728780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I do not wish my computer gets as messy as my mind!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do not wish my computer gets as messy as my mind !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do not wish my computer gets as messy as my mind!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168766</id>
	<title>In other news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258660140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(2021) In other news, the first brain trojan infection has been spotted.<br>(2020) A huge increase in the neural spam traffic has started. Most of Earths inhabitants are suffering from the Nigerian prince pandemia.<br>(2023) 37\% of Earths inhabitants are under the control of the new super brain bot net Morlock.<br>(2004) All hail the Hivemind Morlock!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( 2021 ) In other news , the first brain trojan infection has been spotted .
( 2020 ) A huge increase in the neural spam traffic has started .
Most of Earths inhabitants are suffering from the Nigerian prince pandemia .
( 2023 ) 37 \ % of Earths inhabitants are under the control of the new super brain bot net Morlock .
( 2004 ) All hail the Hivemind Morlock !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(2021) In other news, the first brain trojan infection has been spotted.
(2020) A huge increase in the neural spam traffic has started.
Most of Earths inhabitants are suffering from the Nigerian prince pandemia.
(2023) 37\% of Earths inhabitants are under the control of the new super brain bot net Morlock.
(2004) All hail the Hivemind Morlock!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166222</id>
	<title>Bad choice of killer app.</title>
	<author>Metasquares</author>
	<datestamp>1258635720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The convenience of being able to navigate to a URL without having to type it is a really limited example. How about writing music with it? Being able to notate exactly what's playing in your head without needing to manually write a single note down? Weeks worth of work reduced to a few minutes! Or art: Can't draw? Just visualize!</p><p>Anything you can <em>think about</em> but can't actually <em>do</em> would be fair game.</p><p>Even with those sorts of apps, I still wouldn't get an implant unless my skull was being opened up for some other reason already. It's certainly not a fair tradeoff against something as simple as web browsing, as the summary suggests. I'm all for the braincaps. That's where BCI technology's headed anyway. And those have the distinct advantage of being removable as well...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The convenience of being able to navigate to a URL without having to type it is a really limited example .
How about writing music with it ?
Being able to notate exactly what 's playing in your head without needing to manually write a single note down ?
Weeks worth of work reduced to a few minutes !
Or art : Ca n't draw ?
Just visualize ! Anything you can think about but ca n't actually do would be fair game.Even with those sorts of apps , I still would n't get an implant unless my skull was being opened up for some other reason already .
It 's certainly not a fair tradeoff against something as simple as web browsing , as the summary suggests .
I 'm all for the braincaps .
That 's where BCI technology 's headed anyway .
And those have the distinct advantage of being removable as well.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The convenience of being able to navigate to a URL without having to type it is a really limited example.
How about writing music with it?
Being able to notate exactly what's playing in your head without needing to manually write a single note down?
Weeks worth of work reduced to a few minutes!
Or art: Can't draw?
Just visualize!Anything you can think about but can't actually do would be fair game.Even with those sorts of apps, I still wouldn't get an implant unless my skull was being opened up for some other reason already.
It's certainly not a fair tradeoff against something as simple as web browsing, as the summary suggests.
I'm all for the braincaps.
That's where BCI technology's headed anyway.
And those have the distinct advantage of being removable as well...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165606</id>
	<title>But Unfortunately...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258632960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Computer implants will control brains by 2019.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Computer implants will control brains by 2019 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Computer implants will control brains by 2019.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30170808</id>
	<title>Re:But Unfortunately...</title>
	<author>pwfffff</author>
	<datestamp>1258731180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, good idea. I mean without a direct neural interface, evil people would never be able to write things like an image of a man with a gaping anus into your brain right?</p><p>By the way, have you met my friend goatse?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , good idea .
I mean without a direct neural interface , evil people would never be able to write things like an image of a man with a gaping anus into your brain right ? By the way , have you met my friend goatse ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, good idea.
I mean without a direct neural interface, evil people would never be able to write things like an image of a man with a gaping anus into your brain right?By the way, have you met my friend goatse?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166566</id>
	<title>Usability concerns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258637400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I doubt these king of interfaces are useful since people are in better control of their hands than their thoughts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt these king of interfaces are useful since people are in better control of their hands than their thoughts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt these king of interfaces are useful since people are in better control of their hands than their thoughts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168338</id>
	<title>Re:Peter Hamilton Sci-Fi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258654740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anne McCaffrey was writing such stories, with spaceship pilots hardwired directly into their ships, in the <i>late 60's</i> -- when Reynolds, Gibson, AND Hamilton were still in diapers (either literally or figuratively)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anne McCaffrey was writing such stories , with spaceship pilots hardwired directly into their ships , in the late 60 's -- when Reynolds , Gibson , AND Hamilton were still in diapers ( either literally or figuratively )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anne McCaffrey was writing such stories, with spaceship pilots hardwired directly into their ships, in the late 60's -- when Reynolds, Gibson, AND Hamilton were still in diapers (either literally or figuratively)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165698</id>
	<title>I love these 10 year predictions...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258633320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cause look at what happened from 2000 - 2010<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....let me see: facebook, twitter, blogs...holy shit, we're going downhill fast.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cause look at what happened from 2000 - 2010 ....let me see : facebook , twitter , blogs...holy shit , we 're going downhill fast .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cause look at what happened from 2000 - 2010 ....let me see: facebook, twitter, blogs...holy shit, we're going downhill fast.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167028</id>
	<title>Re:The Progress of Lazyness</title>
	<author>Merls the Sneaky</author>
	<datestamp>1258640520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean you have to use your hands? That's like a baby's toy!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean you have to use your hands ?
That 's like a baby 's toy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean you have to use your hands?
That's like a baby's toy!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166242</id>
	<title>I'm sick of being underestimated</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258635780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why, oh why does everyone at Intel think that people just want to 'surf the web' with whatever they happen to invent? You invent freaking brain implants and the first obvious use becomes surfing the web?</p><p>It could not be<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... `write code` or `use photoshop` or<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. anything even remotely challenging to a human brain?</p><p>Ah well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why , oh why does everyone at Intel think that people just want to 'surf the web ' with whatever they happen to invent ?
You invent freaking brain implants and the first obvious use becomes surfing the web ? It could not be ... ` write code ` or ` use photoshop ` or .. anything even remotely challenging to a human brain ? Ah well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why, oh why does everyone at Intel think that people just want to 'surf the web' with whatever they happen to invent?
You invent freaking brain implants and the first obvious use becomes surfing the web?It could not be ... `write code` or `use photoshop` or .. anything even remotely challenging to a human brain?Ah well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167096</id>
	<title>Re:Peter Hamilton Sci-Fi</title>
	<author>kostmo</author>
	<datestamp>1258641060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One of my favorites is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feed\_(novel)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Feed</a> [wikipedia.org] by M. T. Anderson.  It describes just the kind of dystopian future of direct-brain advertising that one of the <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1450910&amp;cid=30165644" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">above posts</a> [slashdot.org] anticipates.  An interesting part of the book is how private instant-messaging is used, being functionally equivalent to telepathy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of my favorites is Feed [ wikipedia.org ] by M. T. Anderson .
It describes just the kind of dystopian future of direct-brain advertising that one of the above posts [ slashdot.org ] anticipates .
An interesting part of the book is how private instant-messaging is used , being functionally equivalent to telepathy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of my favorites is Feed [wikipedia.org] by M. T. Anderson.
It describes just the kind of dystopian future of direct-brain advertising that one of the above posts [slashdot.org] anticipates.
An interesting part of the book is how private instant-messaging is used, being functionally equivalent to telepathy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30175964</id>
	<title>Re:The Reason</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258750200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And yet, people log onto the web to do exactly those sorts of things EVERY DAY.</p><p>"Surfing the web" is not the modern analog of "channel surfing."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And yet , people log onto the web to do exactly those sorts of things EVERY DAY .
" Surfing the web " is not the modern analog of " channel surfing .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And yet, people log onto the web to do exactly those sorts of things EVERY DAY.
"Surfing the web" is not the modern analog of "channel surfing.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168704</id>
	<title>New definition for thoughtcrimes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258659060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What would hacking be like?  I'd love to see what mind control is like in a real manifestation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What would hacking be like ?
I 'd love to see what mind control is like in a real manifestation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would hacking be like?
I'd love to see what mind control is like in a real manifestation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167552</id>
	<title>Re:BLEH!!! Get that kid off my lawn</title>
	<author>Concerned Onlooker</author>
	<datestamp>1258645800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>" and insurance paying for them"</p><p>This is about science, not science fiction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" and insurance paying for them " This is about science , not science fiction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>" and insurance paying for them"This is about science, not science fiction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166188</id>
	<title>Re:Why surgically?</title>
	<author>Rashdot</author>
	<datestamp>1258635480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>when someday nanobots will build an interface directly inside the brain?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>when someday nanobots will build an interface directly inside the brain ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when someday nanobots will build an interface directly inside the brain?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169722</id>
	<title>computers, television sets and cell phones</title>
	<author>dp\_wiz</author>
	<datestamp>1258719960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>...so they can be used to operate <b>computers, television sets and cell phones</b></p></div> </blockquote><p>
In my 2020es? duh!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...so they can be used to operate computers , television sets and cell phones In my 2020es ?
duh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...so they can be used to operate computers, television sets and cell phones 
In my 2020es?
duh!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165772</id>
	<title>Imagine the popup spam.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258633680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're reading some article on CNN and suddently these thoughts start going through your head:</p><p>"Pills from Canada."<br>"Everyone can buy a house! Get a no down payment mortgage today!"<br>"Nigeria can make me rich."<br>"I feel depressed."<br>"Seen on Oprah Jr! Buy Dan Brown's Vampires and Wizards today!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're reading some article on CNN and suddently these thoughts start going through your head : " Pills from Canada .
" " Everyone can buy a house !
Get a no down payment mortgage today !
" " Nigeria can make me rich .
" " I feel depressed .
" " Seen on Oprah Jr !
Buy Dan Brown 's Vampires and Wizards today !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're reading some article on CNN and suddently these thoughts start going through your head:"Pills from Canada.
""Everyone can buy a house!
Get a no down payment mortgage today!
""Nigeria can make me rich.
""I feel depressed.
""Seen on Oprah Jr!
Buy Dan Brown's Vampires and Wizards today!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167630</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sick of being underestimated</title>
	<author>c\_sd\_m</author>
	<datestamp>1258646880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At least it's not just stimulating the pleasure centres. Even with all the knowledge at their fingertips, people still just want to watch sitcoms and youtube. I would guess this tech would replace Prozac pretty quickly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least it 's not just stimulating the pleasure centres .
Even with all the knowledge at their fingertips , people still just want to watch sitcoms and youtube .
I would guess this tech would replace Prozac pretty quickly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least it's not just stimulating the pleasure centres.
Even with all the knowledge at their fingertips, people still just want to watch sitcoms and youtube.
I would guess this tech would replace Prozac pretty quickly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166920</id>
	<title>Re:Not for me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258639680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1996- I'll never connect my desktop permanently to the internet. My desktop is the last sanctuary I have left, and I'm not going to jeopardize it by connecting it into a system which can easily be tapped, read, and quite probably manipulated by an outside force.</p><p>2003- I'll never post pictures of myself drunk on the internet. My privacy is the last sanctuary I have left, and I'm not going to jeopardize it by connecting it into a system which can easily be tapped, read, and quite probably manipulated by an outside force.</p><p>etc, etc</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1996- I 'll never connect my desktop permanently to the internet .
My desktop is the last sanctuary I have left , and I 'm not going to jeopardize it by connecting it into a system which can easily be tapped , read , and quite probably manipulated by an outside force.2003- I 'll never post pictures of myself drunk on the internet .
My privacy is the last sanctuary I have left , and I 'm not going to jeopardize it by connecting it into a system which can easily be tapped , read , and quite probably manipulated by an outside force.etc , etc</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1996- I'll never connect my desktop permanently to the internet.
My desktop is the last sanctuary I have left, and I'm not going to jeopardize it by connecting it into a system which can easily be tapped, read, and quite probably manipulated by an outside force.2003- I'll never post pictures of myself drunk on the internet.
My privacy is the last sanctuary I have left, and I'm not going to jeopardize it by connecting it into a system which can easily be tapped, read, and quite probably manipulated by an outside force.etc, etc</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169414</id>
	<title>Re:Bad choice of killer app.</title>
	<author>ignavus</author>
	<datestamp>1258715460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have all these great ideas for an essay, but when I go to write it, the ideas all disappear.</p><p>I wish I could just think the essay when I am in my creative mood and thinking faster than I can write, and then the essay would just appear out of the printer.</p><p>That would be seriously cool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have all these great ideas for an essay , but when I go to write it , the ideas all disappear.I wish I could just think the essay when I am in my creative mood and thinking faster than I can write , and then the essay would just appear out of the printer.That would be seriously cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have all these great ideas for an essay, but when I go to write it, the ideas all disappear.I wish I could just think the essay when I am in my creative mood and thinking faster than I can write, and then the essay would just appear out of the printer.That would be seriously cool.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169438</id>
	<title>And one year later..</title>
	<author>Sitxu</author>
	<datestamp>1258715880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Implats will control human brains...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>                        Implats will control human brains.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
                        Implats will control human brains...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167272</id>
	<title>Re:But Unfortunately...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258642680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Perhaps a panic button</p></div><p>What kind of nerd are your?  That flies right in the face of DON'T PANIC!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps a panic buttonWhat kind of nerd are your ?
That flies right in the face of DO N'T PANIC !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps a panic buttonWhat kind of nerd are your?
That flies right in the face of DON'T PANIC!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166968</id>
	<title>Re:"I'm a Mac...</title>
	<author>Merls the Sneaky</author>
	<datestamp>1258640040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mac. Think different?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mac .
Think different ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mac.
Think different?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166448</id>
	<title>Re:Let me know when...nike jordan shoes,handbags,</title>
	<author>coolforsale114</author>
	<datestamp>1258636800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com]
Christmas is around the corner:  And old customers can also enjoy
the gifts sent by my company in a can also request to our company. Gifts lot,Buy more get the moreOnly this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best
services". Your satisfaction is our main pursue. You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.Ladies and Gentlemen  weicome  to  my  coolforsale.com.Here,there
are   the   most   fashion   products . Pass by but don't   miss  it.Select  your  favorite  clothing!  Welcome  to come  next
time ! Thank you!     <a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp</a> [coolforsale.com]?
id=s76 (Tracksuit w)
ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket,
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35
Tshirts (Polo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
free shipping
competitive price
any size available
accept the paypal
Thanks</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] Christmas is around the corner : And old customers can also enjoy the gifts sent by my company in a can also request to our company .
Gifts lot,Buy more get the moreOnly this site have this treatmentOur goal is " Best quality , Best reputation , Best services " .
Your satisfaction is our main pursue .
You can find the best products from us , meeting your different needs.Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but do n't miss it.Select your favorite clothing !
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you !
http : //www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp [ coolforsale.com ] ?
id = s76 ( Tracksuit w ) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket , Air jordan ( 1-24 ) shoes $ 33 Nike shox ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) $ 35 Handbags ( Coach lv fendi d&amp;g ) $ 35 Tshirts ( Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste ) $ 16 free shipping competitive price any size available accept the paypal Thanks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com]
Christmas is around the corner:  And old customers can also enjoy
the gifts sent by my company in a can also request to our company.
Gifts lot,Buy more get the moreOnly this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best
services".
Your satisfaction is our main pursue.
You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.Ladies and Gentlemen  weicome  to  my  coolforsale.com.Here,there
are   the   most   fashion   products .
Pass by but don't   miss  it.Select  your  favorite  clothing!
Welcome  to come  next
time !
Thank you!
http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp [coolforsale.com]?
id=s76 (Tracksuit w)
ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket,
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
free shipping
competitive price
any size available
accept the paypal
Thanks</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166352</id>
	<title>Ob link to XKCD</title>
	<author>sconeu</author>
	<datestamp>1258636320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://xkcd.com/644/" title="xkcd.com">http://xkcd.com/644/</a> [xkcd.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //xkcd.com/644/ [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://xkcd.com/644/ [xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165644</id>
	<title>Last Thing I Want</title>
	<author>Nautical Insanity</author>
	<datestamp>1258633080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is someone trying to figure out a way to get advertising into my mind. We all know someone is going to try.</p><p>Fortunately, feeding input directly into the brain is more difficult that reading output from it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is someone trying to figure out a way to get advertising into my mind .
We all know someone is going to try.Fortunately , feeding input directly into the brain is more difficult that reading output from it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is someone trying to figure out a way to get advertising into my mind.
We all know someone is going to try.Fortunately, feeding input directly into the brain is more difficult that reading output from it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167120</id>
	<title>Youtube video of though control device that's here</title>
	<author>user\_foo1</author>
	<datestamp>1258641180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Emotiv has developed a headset that lets you interact with the computer with your thoughts.  The device is available now and doesn't require any skull drilling.

For a video of a first-time user controlling an onscreen cube with their brain visit:
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch\_popup?v=5GX8moQzOOM" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch\_popup?v=5GX8moQzOOM</a> [youtube.com]

More details at:
<a href="http://emotiv.com/" title="emotiv.com" rel="nofollow">http://emotiv.com/</a> [emotiv.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Emotiv has developed a headset that lets you interact with the computer with your thoughts .
The device is available now and does n't require any skull drilling .
For a video of a first-time user controlling an onscreen cube with their brain visit : http : //www.youtube.com/watch \ _popup ? v = 5GX8moQzOOM [ youtube.com ] More details at : http : //emotiv.com/ [ emotiv.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Emotiv has developed a headset that lets you interact with the computer with your thoughts.
The device is available now and doesn't require any skull drilling.
For a video of a first-time user controlling an onscreen cube with their brain visit:
http://www.youtube.com/watch\_popup?v=5GX8moQzOOM [youtube.com]

More details at:
http://emotiv.com/ [emotiv.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165790</id>
	<title>Remember</title>
	<author>cstdenis</author>
	<datestamp>1258633740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Information wants to be free. That includes your memories. Once there are implants, some hacker will start freeing it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Information wants to be free .
That includes your memories .
Once there are implants , some hacker will start freeing it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Information wants to be free.
That includes your memories.
Once there are implants, some hacker will start freeing it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166122</id>
	<title>Not only Intel...</title>
	<author>bartosz.broda</author>
	<datestamp>1258635180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, not only Intel is working on that kind of stuff. I got <a href="http://www.ocztechnology.com/products/ocz\_peripherals/nia-neural\_impulse\_actuator" title="ocztechnology.com" rel="nofollow"> one of those </a> [ocztechnology.com] and it is working (well, kind of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)  ).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , not only Intel is working on that kind of stuff .
I got one of those [ ocztechnology.com ] and it is working ( well , kind of ; - ) ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, not only Intel is working on that kind of stuff.
I got  one of those  [ocztechnology.com] and it is working (well, kind of ;-)  ).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166468</id>
	<title>fat</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258636860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>thank god, to fat to type.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>thank god , to fat to type .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thank god, to fat to type.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166898</id>
	<title>That's where I draw the line</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258639440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No way I'm buying a Playstation 5 BC!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No way I 'm buying a Playstation 5 BC !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No way I'm buying a Playstation 5 BC!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165800</id>
	<title>Risk vs Reward?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258633740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seems like a question of risk vs reward to me...

I doubt anyone is going to risk serious loss of function or death for the chance of being able to change the channel with their thoughts. Do we really need this?

Now if this were something like an reborn 80s style math-co-processor for the brain, it might be something I would consider. The brain is optimized for symbolic reasoning, not pure number crunching. If I could do complex computations simply by thinking of them and having them routed to/from such a device... now, THAT is something I'd find intriguing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems like a question of risk vs reward to me.. . I doubt anyone is going to risk serious loss of function or death for the chance of being able to change the channel with their thoughts .
Do we really need this ?
Now if this were something like an reborn 80s style math-co-processor for the brain , it might be something I would consider .
The brain is optimized for symbolic reasoning , not pure number crunching .
If I could do complex computations simply by thinking of them and having them routed to/from such a device... now , THAT is something I 'd find intriguing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems like a question of risk vs reward to me...

I doubt anyone is going to risk serious loss of function or death for the chance of being able to change the channel with their thoughts.
Do we really need this?
Now if this were something like an reborn 80s style math-co-processor for the brain, it might be something I would consider.
The brain is optimized for symbolic reasoning, not pure number crunching.
If I could do complex computations simply by thinking of them and having them routed to/from such a device... now, THAT is something I'd find intriguing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165730</id>
	<title>Re:Last Thing I Want</title>
	<author>MozeeToby</author>
	<datestamp>1258633440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know what you mean, ever since I woke up in the future I've been having these recuring dreams about Lightspeed Briefs (tm).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know what you mean , ever since I woke up in the future I 've been having these recuring dreams about Lightspeed Briefs ( tm ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know what you mean, ever since I woke up in the future I've been having these recuring dreams about Lightspeed Briefs (tm).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166736</id>
	<title>Holes In Your Head</title>
	<author>DynaSoar</author>
	<datestamp>1258638540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you really want someone drilling holes in your head and shoving wires into it just so you don't have to type and use a mouse? Do you have any idea how many of these things you'll need shoved through your skull to be able to fore go just those two activities? (Hundreds) Do you realize that implants hasten neuron death and as they die you'll need to associated electrodes replaced? And just who makes enough money to pay for undergoing dozens (at least!) of invasive implantation surgeries requiring real time CT or MR imaging? You insurance damn sure won't pay for it. And don't give me that "for the disabled" crap -- they don't get the expensive stuff either.</p><p>You don't need implants for brain "waves". Implants are better suited for detecting neural firing patterns on a much smaller scale. But you can get the job done with "waves" (EEG) without having to trephan yourself.</p><p>There are now EEG systems that have the premap on the electrode, making impedance issues irrelevant and signal balancing automatic. There are EEG analysis packages that use continuous wavelet analysis to do time/frequency analysis similar to the "thousands of channels" analysis radio-astronomers enjoy. Between these two, and 'training' a system to recognize a particular person's EEG patterns well enough to control a device like a computer, the other EEG related problems like skin potentials, EMG and EKG artifact become non-issues. And as far as localization, I can reliably localize 40 to 50 signals simultaneously with this technology using a high density (256 or more) electrode EEG.</p><p>This technology exists now. The computing power necessary to operate in as a control system in real time is beyond most people's ability to purchase. So if the nice folks from Intel will kindly put down the cranial drill and get back to what they're good at, maybe by 2020 we can have the sort of computing power sitting on everyone's desk if not sitting in a handheld device in their pocket.</p><p>And get away from that fMRI. I don't care what you think you saw. I saw the fMRI "brain scan" of the dead salmon showing it lighting up as it recognized a human emotion from a photo it had been shown before (but while still dead).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you really want someone drilling holes in your head and shoving wires into it just so you do n't have to type and use a mouse ?
Do you have any idea how many of these things you 'll need shoved through your skull to be able to fore go just those two activities ?
( Hundreds ) Do you realize that implants hasten neuron death and as they die you 'll need to associated electrodes replaced ?
And just who makes enough money to pay for undergoing dozens ( at least !
) of invasive implantation surgeries requiring real time CT or MR imaging ?
You insurance damn sure wo n't pay for it .
And do n't give me that " for the disabled " crap -- they do n't get the expensive stuff either.You do n't need implants for brain " waves " .
Implants are better suited for detecting neural firing patterns on a much smaller scale .
But you can get the job done with " waves " ( EEG ) without having to trephan yourself.There are now EEG systems that have the premap on the electrode , making impedance issues irrelevant and signal balancing automatic .
There are EEG analysis packages that use continuous wavelet analysis to do time/frequency analysis similar to the " thousands of channels " analysis radio-astronomers enjoy .
Between these two , and 'training ' a system to recognize a particular person 's EEG patterns well enough to control a device like a computer , the other EEG related problems like skin potentials , EMG and EKG artifact become non-issues .
And as far as localization , I can reliably localize 40 to 50 signals simultaneously with this technology using a high density ( 256 or more ) electrode EEG.This technology exists now .
The computing power necessary to operate in as a control system in real time is beyond most people 's ability to purchase .
So if the nice folks from Intel will kindly put down the cranial drill and get back to what they 're good at , maybe by 2020 we can have the sort of computing power sitting on everyone 's desk if not sitting in a handheld device in their pocket.And get away from that fMRI .
I do n't care what you think you saw .
I saw the fMRI " brain scan " of the dead salmon showing it lighting up as it recognized a human emotion from a photo it had been shown before ( but while still dead ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you really want someone drilling holes in your head and shoving wires into it just so you don't have to type and use a mouse?
Do you have any idea how many of these things you'll need shoved through your skull to be able to fore go just those two activities?
(Hundreds) Do you realize that implants hasten neuron death and as they die you'll need to associated electrodes replaced?
And just who makes enough money to pay for undergoing dozens (at least!
) of invasive implantation surgeries requiring real time CT or MR imaging?
You insurance damn sure won't pay for it.
And don't give me that "for the disabled" crap -- they don't get the expensive stuff either.You don't need implants for brain "waves".
Implants are better suited for detecting neural firing patterns on a much smaller scale.
But you can get the job done with "waves" (EEG) without having to trephan yourself.There are now EEG systems that have the premap on the electrode, making impedance issues irrelevant and signal balancing automatic.
There are EEG analysis packages that use continuous wavelet analysis to do time/frequency analysis similar to the "thousands of channels" analysis radio-astronomers enjoy.
Between these two, and 'training' a system to recognize a particular person's EEG patterns well enough to control a device like a computer, the other EEG related problems like skin potentials, EMG and EKG artifact become non-issues.
And as far as localization, I can reliably localize 40 to 50 signals simultaneously with this technology using a high density (256 or more) electrode EEG.This technology exists now.
The computing power necessary to operate in as a control system in real time is beyond most people's ability to purchase.
So if the nice folks from Intel will kindly put down the cranial drill and get back to what they're good at, maybe by 2020 we can have the sort of computing power sitting on everyone's desk if not sitting in a handheld device in their pocket.And get away from that fMRI.
I don't care what you think you saw.
I saw the fMRI "brain scan" of the dead salmon showing it lighting up as it recognized a human emotion from a photo it had been shown before (but while still dead).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166558</id>
	<title>Re:But Unfortunately...</title>
	<author>aldld</author>
	<datestamp>1258637340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I, for one, welcome our new brain implant overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one , welcome our new brain implant overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one, welcome our new brain implant overlords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168810</id>
	<title>Re:Not for me</title>
	<author>JuzzFunky</author>
	<datestamp>1258747320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> My mind is the last sanctuary I have left</p> </div><p>This thought has been deemed inappropriate.  Citizens are reminded of their duty to engage only in authorized thought patterns.  All traces of this thought will be removed from your memory.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My mind is the last sanctuary I have left This thought has been deemed inappropriate .
Citizens are reminded of their duty to engage only in authorized thought patterns .
All traces of this thought will be removed from your memory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> My mind is the last sanctuary I have left This thought has been deemed inappropriate.
Citizens are reminded of their duty to engage only in authorized thought patterns.
All traces of this thought will be removed from your memory.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30172240</id>
	<title>"Intel Inside"</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1258737720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Time to put the "Intel Inside" sticker on my forehead?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Time to put the " Intel Inside " sticker on my forehead ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Time to put the "Intel Inside" sticker on my forehead?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167616</id>
	<title>Re:Not for me</title>
	<author>c\_sd\_m</author>
	<datestamp>1258646640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But as long as it's done collectively it's okay? Or have you given up internet and TV already?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But as long as it 's done collectively it 's okay ?
Or have you given up internet and TV already ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But as long as it's done collectively it's okay?
Or have you given up internet and TV already?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166156</id>
	<title>The Progress of Lazyness</title>
	<author>Reality Master 101</author>
	<datestamp>1258635360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the future...</p><p>"Wait, Dad, you mean you used to have to <i>move your arm</i> to change the channel on the TV?"</p><p>"That's nothing, son. Great-Grandpa had to actually <i>get up off the sofa</i> and <i>move</i> to the TV to turn a dial."</p><p>Son physically reels. "Whoa, stop, you're blowin' my mind. But they did have motor-sofas to move you to the TV, right?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the future... " Wait , Dad , you mean you used to have to move your arm to change the channel on the TV ?
" " That 's nothing , son .
Great-Grandpa had to actually get up off the sofa and move to the TV to turn a dial .
" Son physically reels .
" Whoa , stop , you 're blowin ' my mind .
But they did have motor-sofas to move you to the TV , right ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the future..."Wait, Dad, you mean you used to have to move your arm to change the channel on the TV?
""That's nothing, son.
Great-Grandpa had to actually get up off the sofa and move to the TV to turn a dial.
"Son physically reels.
"Whoa, stop, you're blowin' my mind.
But they did have motor-sofas to move you to the TV, right?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166530</id>
	<title>Re:I call</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1258637160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Generally, people with Parkinson's have been pretty willing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Generally , people with Parkinson 's have been pretty willing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Generally, people with Parkinson's have been pretty willing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168296</id>
	<title>Re:Why implants?</title>
	<author>Tibia1</author>
	<datestamp>1258654260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Implants will never become popularized. Nanobots will be the first thing that will be introduced into every person's brain that can first afford it. A team of nanobots aiding the neurons while communicating with the internet is a little bit more useful than a clunky sensor that, as you mentioned, needs upgrading.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Implants will never become popularized .
Nanobots will be the first thing that will be introduced into every person 's brain that can first afford it .
A team of nanobots aiding the neurons while communicating with the internet is a little bit more useful than a clunky sensor that , as you mentioned , needs upgrading .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Implants will never become popularized.
Nanobots will be the first thing that will be introduced into every person's brain that can first afford it.
A team of nanobots aiding the neurons while communicating with the internet is a little bit more useful than a clunky sensor that, as you mentioned, needs upgrading.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166902</id>
	<title>For a person with a serious disability</title>
	<author>mschuyler</author>
	<datestamp>1258639500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this might be just the ticket. It's not just about you. Just look at the difficult someone with cerebral palsy or ALS has with motor skills. There's a brain in there, sometimes a brilliant one (Stephen Hawking, for example). Something like this could be a wonderful enabler for them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this might be just the ticket .
It 's not just about you .
Just look at the difficult someone with cerebral palsy or ALS has with motor skills .
There 's a brain in there , sometimes a brilliant one ( Stephen Hawking , for example ) .
Something like this could be a wonderful enabler for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this might be just the ticket.
It's not just about you.
Just look at the difficult someone with cerebral palsy or ALS has with motor skills.
There's a brain in there, sometimes a brilliant one (Stephen Hawking, for example).
Something like this could be a wonderful enabler for them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166540</id>
	<title>Old news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258637220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been alpha testing this and it works well. For example to add my signature and submit this post I simply think "Anonymous Coward" and then "submit active form". Couldn't be simpler.</p><p>Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been alpha testing this and it works well .
For example to add my signature and submit this post I simply think " Anonymous Coward " and then " submit active form " .
Could n't be simpler.Dear aunt , let 's set so double the killer delete select all</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been alpha testing this and it works well.
For example to add my signature and submit this post I simply think "Anonymous Coward" and then "submit active form".
Couldn't be simpler.Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169172</id>
	<title>Idiots</title>
	<author>SpaghettiPattern</author>
	<datestamp>1258712100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Idiots! They've got it the wrong way 'round.<br> <br>
Or have they?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Idiots !
They 've got it the wrong way 'round .
Or have they ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Idiots!
They've got it the wrong way 'round.
Or have they?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165764</id>
	<title>Re:But my intel drivers don't work on my pc NOW!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258633560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Depends on how open your mind is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends on how open your mind is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends on how open your mind is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166396</id>
	<title>The Reason</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258636560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><em>Imagine being able to surf the Web with the power of your thoughts.</em>
<br> <br>
And there you have it. Why would we want to set up a direct connection between the human mind and a 64-bit multicore computer with many gigabytes of RAM, over a terabyte of storage, and a high-speed connection to the international network of computing machinery? To do large-scale science? To create art as it has never been created before? To help throw off the shackles of oppression and exploitation? Shit, to manage your budget and do your taxes? No. To surf the web.
<br> <br>
Well, at least they're not kidding themselves over at the ever-practical Intel.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine being able to surf the Web with the power of your thoughts .
And there you have it .
Why would we want to set up a direct connection between the human mind and a 64-bit multicore computer with many gigabytes of RAM , over a terabyte of storage , and a high-speed connection to the international network of computing machinery ?
To do large-scale science ?
To create art as it has never been created before ?
To help throw off the shackles of oppression and exploitation ?
Shit , to manage your budget and do your taxes ?
No. To surf the web .
Well , at least they 're not kidding themselves over at the ever-practical Intel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine being able to surf the Web with the power of your thoughts.
And there you have it.
Why would we want to set up a direct connection between the human mind and a 64-bit multicore computer with many gigabytes of RAM, over a terabyte of storage, and a high-speed connection to the international network of computing machinery?
To do large-scale science?
To create art as it has never been created before?
To help throw off the shackles of oppression and exploitation?
Shit, to manage your budget and do your taxes?
No. To surf the web.
Well, at least they're not kidding themselves over at the ever-practical Intel.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166328</id>
	<title>Lag &amp; Noise</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258636200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While technology is getting better at imaging people's brains, there's still a lot of lag involved. fMRIs for example look at blood flow to see what areas of a brain are in use and at best get about one update every second. That doesn't necessarily mean it can register a command every second though, since there would have to be some sort of threshold which determines what command is executed, if any. As for brainwave sensors, there is a LOT of noise in brainwaves. Which means that a device that is sensitive to them needs to insensitive enough that random commands aren't executed. For this reason it has proven very difficult to control something through a brainwave sensor. But it can be done and one can get better with training, but when a mouse or keyboard is so much faster, and more accurate, I don't see any Computer Brain interface taking off anytime soon, if ever. The most I could see coming from a computer brain interface would be something that controls your mouse pointer, but slower and less accurate than a regular mouse, and requires a LOT of concentration.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While technology is getting better at imaging people 's brains , there 's still a lot of lag involved .
fMRIs for example look at blood flow to see what areas of a brain are in use and at best get about one update every second .
That does n't necessarily mean it can register a command every second though , since there would have to be some sort of threshold which determines what command is executed , if any .
As for brainwave sensors , there is a LOT of noise in brainwaves .
Which means that a device that is sensitive to them needs to insensitive enough that random commands are n't executed .
For this reason it has proven very difficult to control something through a brainwave sensor .
But it can be done and one can get better with training , but when a mouse or keyboard is so much faster , and more accurate , I do n't see any Computer Brain interface taking off anytime soon , if ever .
The most I could see coming from a computer brain interface would be something that controls your mouse pointer , but slower and less accurate than a regular mouse , and requires a LOT of concentration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While technology is getting better at imaging people's brains, there's still a lot of lag involved.
fMRIs for example look at blood flow to see what areas of a brain are in use and at best get about one update every second.
That doesn't necessarily mean it can register a command every second though, since there would have to be some sort of threshold which determines what command is executed, if any.
As for brainwave sensors, there is a LOT of noise in brainwaves.
Which means that a device that is sensitive to them needs to insensitive enough that random commands aren't executed.
For this reason it has proven very difficult to control something through a brainwave sensor.
But it can be done and one can get better with training, but when a mouse or keyboard is so much faster, and more accurate, I don't see any Computer Brain interface taking off anytime soon, if ever.
The most I could see coming from a computer brain interface would be something that controls your mouse pointer, but slower and less accurate than a regular mouse, and requires a LOT of concentration.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167568</id>
	<title>Re:BLEH!!! Get that kid off my lawn</title>
	<author>uvajed\_ekil</author>
	<datestamp>1258646040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, it's true, we're almost there. And this will be the year of linux on the desktop, Sarah Palin is a genius, America's got talent, and I don't want more pie. Right...</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it 's true , we 're almost there .
And this will be the year of linux on the desktop , Sarah Palin is a genius , America 's got talent , and I do n't want more pie .
Right.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it's true, we're almost there.
And this will be the year of linux on the desktop, Sarah Palin is a genius, America's got talent, and I don't want more pie.
Right...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30170126</id>
	<title>Re:Let me know when...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258726560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, right. i can has cheezburger</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , right .
i can has cheezburger</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, right.
i can has cheezburger</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167784</id>
	<title>Re:The Progress of Lazyness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258648620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The father tried to answer him but his 6 layered chin had swallowed up his mouth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The father tried to answer him but his 6 layered chin had swallowed up his mouth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The father tried to answer him but his 6 layered chin had swallowed up his mouth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168642</id>
	<title>I don't think so</title>
	<author>jipn4</author>
	<datestamp>1258658100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem isn't technology it's biology: brain surgery is risky and it will remain risky in 2020.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is n't technology it 's biology : brain surgery is risky and it will remain risky in 2020 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem isn't technology it's biology: brain surgery is risky and it will remain risky in 2020.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166310</id>
	<title>Don't get too carried away</title>
	<author>dave562</author>
	<datestamp>1258636140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems like they're at the point where they can recognize thought patterns.  They intend to map those patterns to a UI.  Just the other day I found myself sitting in front of a PC and browsing the web (imagine that).  I've been using a Mac a lot lately.  I wanted to scroll the page down and I found myself reaching for the touch pad to do that nifty two finger drag motion.</p><p>Some where between wanting to scroll the page down and the actual muscle action of reaching for the non-existent track pad was a series of neuro-chemical impulses.  It seems like the researchers are identifying those.  It would be kind of cool to be able to move a pointer around the screen and do basic web browsing actions (forward, backward, click, scroll, etc) without ever having to reach for the mouse.  It seems like I first read about people using alpha waves to control mouse pointers over a decade ago at this point.  It's about time they're getting to the point of doing something that might be useful.</p><p>Now once they get to the point of bringing up search results based on our thoughts, that is when I will start worrying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems like they 're at the point where they can recognize thought patterns .
They intend to map those patterns to a UI .
Just the other day I found myself sitting in front of a PC and browsing the web ( imagine that ) .
I 've been using a Mac a lot lately .
I wanted to scroll the page down and I found myself reaching for the touch pad to do that nifty two finger drag motion.Some where between wanting to scroll the page down and the actual muscle action of reaching for the non-existent track pad was a series of neuro-chemical impulses .
It seems like the researchers are identifying those .
It would be kind of cool to be able to move a pointer around the screen and do basic web browsing actions ( forward , backward , click , scroll , etc ) without ever having to reach for the mouse .
It seems like I first read about people using alpha waves to control mouse pointers over a decade ago at this point .
It 's about time they 're getting to the point of doing something that might be useful.Now once they get to the point of bringing up search results based on our thoughts , that is when I will start worrying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems like they're at the point where they can recognize thought patterns.
They intend to map those patterns to a UI.
Just the other day I found myself sitting in front of a PC and browsing the web (imagine that).
I've been using a Mac a lot lately.
I wanted to scroll the page down and I found myself reaching for the touch pad to do that nifty two finger drag motion.Some where between wanting to scroll the page down and the actual muscle action of reaching for the non-existent track pad was a series of neuro-chemical impulses.
It seems like the researchers are identifying those.
It would be kind of cool to be able to move a pointer around the screen and do basic web browsing actions (forward, backward, click, scroll, etc) without ever having to reach for the mouse.
It seems like I first read about people using alpha waves to control mouse pointers over a decade ago at this point.
It's about time they're getting to the point of doing something that might be useful.Now once they get to the point of bringing up search results based on our thoughts, that is when I will start worrying.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165684</id>
	<title>Skynet?</title>
	<author>LuminaireX</author>
	<datestamp>1258633260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The implants will control brains in 2021.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The implants will control brains in 2021 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The implants will control brains in 2021.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166004</id>
	<title>Re:Let me know when...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258634700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the ultimate virus:</p><p>* Computers learn to browse the net based on your thoughts<br>* Average guy things about sex how often?  Every 5 minutes?<br>* How many guys in the average office within "sensor" distance of several computers?</p><p>No one can use their computer anymore: it's All pr0n, all the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the ultimate virus : * Computers learn to browse the net based on your thoughts * Average guy things about sex how often ?
Every 5 minutes ?
* How many guys in the average office within " sensor " distance of several computers ? No one can use their computer anymore : it 's All pr0n , all the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the ultimate virus:* Computers learn to browse the net based on your thoughts* Average guy things about sex how often?
Every 5 minutes?
* How many guys in the average office within "sensor" distance of several computers?No one can use their computer anymore: it's All pr0n, all the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165626</id>
	<title>Please don't...</title>
	<author>thewils</author>
	<datestamp>1258633020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...wire the nuclear plant directly into Homer's brain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...wire the nuclear plant directly into Homer 's brain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...wire the nuclear plant directly into Homer's brain.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30172530</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sick of being underestimated</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1258738740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Probably because enough people at Intel know that 'surf the web' is quite often a euphemism for 'find porn or some other form of online sex.'</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably because enough people at Intel know that 'surf the web ' is quite often a euphemism for 'find porn or some other form of online sex .
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably because enough people at Intel know that 'surf the web' is quite often a euphemism for 'find porn or some other form of online sex.
'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168482</id>
	<title>Re:Let me know when...</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1258656180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, really, I have a direct neural input from the Playboy channel just for the articles.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , really , I have a direct neural input from the Playboy channel just for the articles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, really, I have a direct neural input from the Playboy channel just for the articles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165690</id>
	<title>Peter Hamilton Sci-Fi</title>
	<author>SgtAaron</author>
	<datestamp>1258633260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure he's not the only Sci-Fi author to have put these ideas into fiction.  I had a great time reading his Neutronium Alchemist novels and others and seeing his description of how mind/computer interfaces could function.</p><p>I think it's a lot more realistic than Star Trek (gasp<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) to imagine that future spacers will be sitting on an acceleration couch with their eyes closed--and seeing space around them as if they were outside, than to be sitting at a console with hundreds of controls, relying on the speed of electrons traveling through meat.  And I loved their ability to superimpose heads-up displays onto their vision.  I suppose I'm getting beyond the scope of this story...</p><p>-Aaron</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure he 's not the only Sci-Fi author to have put these ideas into fiction .
I had a great time reading his Neutronium Alchemist novels and others and seeing his description of how mind/computer interfaces could function.I think it 's a lot more realistic than Star Trek ( gasp : ) to imagine that future spacers will be sitting on an acceleration couch with their eyes closed--and seeing space around them as if they were outside , than to be sitting at a console with hundreds of controls , relying on the speed of electrons traveling through meat .
And I loved their ability to superimpose heads-up displays onto their vision .
I suppose I 'm getting beyond the scope of this story...-Aaron</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure he's not the only Sci-Fi author to have put these ideas into fiction.
I had a great time reading his Neutronium Alchemist novels and others and seeing his description of how mind/computer interfaces could function.I think it's a lot more realistic than Star Trek (gasp :) to imagine that future spacers will be sitting on an acceleration couch with their eyes closed--and seeing space around them as if they were outside, than to be sitting at a console with hundreds of controls, relying on the speed of electrons traveling through meat.
And I loved their ability to superimpose heads-up displays onto their vision.
I suppose I'm getting beyond the scope of this story...-Aaron</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167644</id>
	<title>Wasn't me</title>
	<author>TandooriC</author>
	<datestamp>1258647000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dammit! Why does the browser always brings me to pron sites? I wasn't even thinking of it. I swear!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dammit !
Why does the browser always brings me to pron sites ?
I was n't even thinking of it .
I swear !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dammit!
Why does the browser always brings me to pron sites?
I wasn't even thinking of it.
I swear!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167394</id>
	<title>In soviet Russia....</title>
	<author>ProfessionalCookie</author>
	<datestamp>1258644000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In soviet Russia....</htmltext>
<tokenext>In soviet Russia... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In soviet Russia....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166128</id>
	<title>Re:Why implants?</title>
	<author>webmistressrachel</author>
	<datestamp>1258635240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Somebody? More like everybody will, especially once the oh-so-sexy, oh-so-geeky Borg Queen (me!) steps up to the plate<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somebody ?
More like everybody will , especially once the oh-so-sexy , oh-so-geeky Borg Queen ( me !
) steps up to the plate : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somebody?
More like everybody will, especially once the oh-so-sexy, oh-so-geeky Borg Queen (me!
) steps up to the plate :P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168908</id>
	<title>Future is non-invasive Brain-computer interface</title>
	<author>cyberfringe</author>
	<datestamp>1258707600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>While electromagnetic implants will certainly appear first (they are already used for deep-brain stimulation to staunch epileptic attacks), I believe it will be the non-invasive brain-computer interfaces (BCI) that really will come into widespread use.  One step on the way there is a new technique called "Optogenetics" <a href="http://www.stanford.edu/group/dlab/optogenetics/" title="stanford.edu" rel="nofollow">http://www.stanford.edu/group/dlab/optogenetics/</a> [stanford.edu]. Another is "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation" <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcranial\_magnetic\_stimulation" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcranial\_magnetic\_stimulation</a> [wikipedia.org] which has already been used to both induce and suppress brain states.  There are a variety of other techniques being investigated, e.g., near-infrared for monitoring oxygen uptake which also promise good resolution imaging of brain structure and activity.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMFRI)  is the key tool being used now to map cerebral structure and function.  The Koreans have had a 10-year initiative going in reverse-engineering the brain that is now showing very significant progress to the extent that universities such as Seoul National University, Hanyang, and KAIST have actually created multidisciplinary "Brain Engineering" departments.  Last week I drove a toy slot car on a track with an external brain sensor<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... you'll be able to buy it at Toys R US for Christmas this year.  Believe it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While electromagnetic implants will certainly appear first ( they are already used for deep-brain stimulation to staunch epileptic attacks ) , I believe it will be the non-invasive brain-computer interfaces ( BCI ) that really will come into widespread use .
One step on the way there is a new technique called " Optogenetics " http : //www.stanford.edu/group/dlab/optogenetics/ [ stanford.edu ] .
Another is " Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation " http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcranial \ _magnetic \ _stimulation [ wikipedia.org ] which has already been used to both induce and suppress brain states .
There are a variety of other techniques being investigated , e.g. , near-infrared for monitoring oxygen uptake which also promise good resolution imaging of brain structure and activity .
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging ( fMFRI ) is the key tool being used now to map cerebral structure and function .
The Koreans have had a 10-year initiative going in reverse-engineering the brain that is now showing very significant progress to the extent that universities such as Seoul National University , Hanyang , and KAIST have actually created multidisciplinary " Brain Engineering " departments .
Last week I drove a toy slot car on a track with an external brain sensor ... you 'll be able to buy it at Toys R US for Christmas this year .
Believe it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While electromagnetic implants will certainly appear first (they are already used for deep-brain stimulation to staunch epileptic attacks), I believe it will be the non-invasive brain-computer interfaces (BCI) that really will come into widespread use.
One step on the way there is a new technique called "Optogenetics" http://www.stanford.edu/group/dlab/optogenetics/ [stanford.edu].
Another is "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcranial\_magnetic\_stimulation [wikipedia.org] which has already been used to both induce and suppress brain states.
There are a variety of other techniques being investigated, e.g., near-infrared for monitoring oxygen uptake which also promise good resolution imaging of brain structure and activity.
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMFRI)  is the key tool being used now to map cerebral structure and function.
The Koreans have had a 10-year initiative going in reverse-engineering the brain that is now showing very significant progress to the extent that universities such as Seoul National University, Hanyang, and KAIST have actually created multidisciplinary "Brain Engineering" departments.
Last week I drove a toy slot car on a track with an external brain sensor ... you'll be able to buy it at Toys R US for Christmas this year.
Believe it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168038</id>
	<title>Re:But Unfortunately...</title>
	<author>machine321</author>
	<datestamp>1258651440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I loved the movie <i> <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0062153/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">The President's Analyst</a> [imdb.com] </i>!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I loved the movie The President 's Analyst [ imdb.com ] !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I loved the movie  The President's Analyst [imdb.com] !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30177164</id>
	<title>Re:But Unfortunately...</title>
	<author>LrdDimwit</author>
	<datestamp>1258711380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you don't do what the voice in the implant tells you to do, you get a raging headache and are unable to sleep until you comply.  When you try to tell anyone what's happening, it "accidentally" gives you a small seizure.  See the difference now?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you do n't do what the voice in the implant tells you to do , you get a raging headache and are unable to sleep until you comply .
When you try to tell anyone what 's happening , it " accidentally " gives you a small seizure .
See the difference now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you don't do what the voice in the implant tells you to do, you get a raging headache and are unable to sleep until you comply.
When you try to tell anyone what's happening, it "accidentally" gives you a small seizure.
See the difference now?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165806</id>
	<title>Ghost in the Shell! FTW!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258633800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, that anime sci-fi doesn't seem too far-fetched now, does it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , that anime sci-fi does n't seem too far-fetched now , does it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, that anime sci-fi doesn't seem too far-fetched now, does it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167986</id>
	<title>Re:Let me know when...</title>
	<author>Ukab the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1258650840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Playboy Says Breast Implants Could Control Brain Implants by 2025.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Playboy Says Breast Implants Could Control Brain Implants by 2025 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Playboy Says Breast Implants Could Control Brain Implants by 2025.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166840</id>
	<title>La vita loca....</title>
	<author>mevets</author>
	<datestamp>1258639080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Add a lazy boy chair, a huge bag of cheetoes balanced over my left shoulder to let the little nuggets flow with the gentlest nudge, beer, and Depends.    This is gonna be great.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Add a lazy boy chair , a huge bag of cheetoes balanced over my left shoulder to let the little nuggets flow with the gentlest nudge , beer , and Depends .
This is gon na be great .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Add a lazy boy chair, a huge bag of cheetoes balanced over my left shoulder to let the little nuggets flow with the gentlest nudge, beer, and Depends.
This is gonna be great.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166526</id>
	<title>ACTA-2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258637160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The good news: No more DRM<br>The bad news: Everyone will be required to get an implant that determines what movie/tv show/song you are being exposed to, your credit card will be billed automatically. This implant will be done at the patient's expense and not having one will be punishable with a fine of $1 billion (recompense for all the entertainment you are almost assuredly stealing).</p><p>Says RIAA spokesman: "It really is the only way to beat the pirates once and for all"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The good news : No more DRMThe bad news : Everyone will be required to get an implant that determines what movie/tv show/song you are being exposed to , your credit card will be billed automatically .
This implant will be done at the patient 's expense and not having one will be punishable with a fine of $ 1 billion ( recompense for all the entertainment you are almost assuredly stealing ) .Says RIAA spokesman : " It really is the only way to beat the pirates once and for all "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The good news: No more DRMThe bad news: Everyone will be required to get an implant that determines what movie/tv show/song you are being exposed to, your credit card will be billed automatically.
This implant will be done at the patient's expense and not having one will be punishable with a fine of $1 billion (recompense for all the entertainment you are almost assuredly stealing).Says RIAA spokesman: "It really is the only way to beat the pirates once and for all"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169526</id>
	<title>Brain windows</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258717320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now we just wait for the windows 2020 brain edition and hope that our brain fries before the side effects kick in...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now we just wait for the windows 2020 brain edition and hope that our brain fries before the side effects kick in.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now we just wait for the windows 2020 brain edition and hope that our brain fries before the side effects kick in...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167392</id>
	<title>MS Windows for brainstems...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258644000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Microfsoft Windows for brainstems will never ever crash how could you think such a thing?  OS X for brainstems will make you a better interior decorator.  Linux for brainstems will come with 27 different incompatible brain managers, and will *always* download the correct libraries required to eat your dinner everytime, plus you will be able to hack your brain with open sores software, how cool is that?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microfsoft Windows for brainstems will never ever crash how could you think such a thing ?
OS X for brainstems will make you a better interior decorator .
Linux for brainstems will come with 27 different incompatible brain managers , and will * always * download the correct libraries required to eat your dinner everytime , plus you will be able to hack your brain with open sores software , how cool is that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microfsoft Windows for brainstems will never ever crash how could you think such a thing?
OS X for brainstems will make you a better interior decorator.
Linux for brainstems will come with 27 different incompatible brain managers, and will *always* download the correct libraries required to eat your dinner everytime, plus you will be able to hack your brain with open sores software, how cool is that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166592</id>
	<title>Re:Bad choice of killer app.</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1258637520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Can't draw? Just visualize!</p><p>Those who can't draw can't visualize (unless they are physically disabled).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Ca n't draw ?
Just visualize ! Those who ca n't draw ca n't visualize ( unless they are physically disabled ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Can't draw?
Just visualize!Those who can't draw can't visualize (unless they are physically disabled).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167134</id>
	<title>Re:But my intel drivers don't work on my pc NOW!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258641360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>should I get the chip installed in my brain and wait until Linux patches in support? Or wait for an Open Source alternative?</p></div></blockquote><p>Another high-UID poster proves that he isn't a nerd and shouldn't be posting here. A real nerd would have said "I'm going to get the chip installed, then write a Linux patch to support it".<br> <br>Sign of the times, I suppose - too many people here think that being a nerd is downloading Ubuntu and pirating music.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>should I get the chip installed in my brain and wait until Linux patches in support ?
Or wait for an Open Source alternative ? Another high-UID poster proves that he is n't a nerd and should n't be posting here .
A real nerd would have said " I 'm going to get the chip installed , then write a Linux patch to support it " .
Sign of the times , I suppose - too many people here think that being a nerd is downloading Ubuntu and pirating music .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>should I get the chip installed in my brain and wait until Linux patches in support?
Or wait for an Open Source alternative?Another high-UID poster proves that he isn't a nerd and shouldn't be posting here.
A real nerd would have said "I'm going to get the chip installed, then write a Linux patch to support it".
Sign of the times, I suppose - too many people here think that being a nerd is downloading Ubuntu and pirating music.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166214</id>
	<title>I can see it now</title>
	<author>LuxMaker</author>
	<datestamp>1258635660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.entertonement.com/clips/vnzlrlmxdz--Sorry-Dave2001-A-Space-Odyssey-Douglas-Rain-Hal-" title="entertonement.com" rel="nofollow">"I'm sorry Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that."</a> [entertonement.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 'm sorry Dave .
I 'm afraid I ca n't do that .
" [ entertonement.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I'm sorry Dave.
I'm afraid I can't do that.
" [entertonement.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30170108</id>
	<title>Re:The Progress of Lazyness</title>
	<author>DavMz</author>
	<datestamp>1258726260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But I am sure the son will be jealous when he will know I could use clumsy fingers as an excuse for typos.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But I am sure the son will be jealous when he will know I could use clumsy fingers as an excuse for typos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I am sure the son will be jealous when he will know I could use clumsy fingers as an excuse for typos.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30171324</id>
	<title>Re:Holes In Your Head</title>
	<author>Deliveranc3</author>
	<datestamp>1258733760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your brain is a network.<br> <br> Implanting a single input at an early enough stage will produce a "line in" effect that may feel either instinctual or actually produce cognizance depending on the other end of the system.<br> <br> Your brain will simply assume a complex network on the other end of the "input".<br> <br> The brain "grows" the ability to use our current senses no reason this would be any different.<br> <br> The other direction will be more difficult (and probably desired by more people) but the "line in" functionality will be the real game changer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your brain is a network .
Implanting a single input at an early enough stage will produce a " line in " effect that may feel either instinctual or actually produce cognizance depending on the other end of the system .
Your brain will simply assume a complex network on the other end of the " input " .
The brain " grows " the ability to use our current senses no reason this would be any different .
The other direction will be more difficult ( and probably desired by more people ) but the " line in " functionality will be the real game changer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your brain is a network.
Implanting a single input at an early enough stage will produce a "line in" effect that may feel either instinctual or actually produce cognizance depending on the other end of the system.
Your brain will simply assume a complex network on the other end of the "input".
The brain "grows" the ability to use our current senses no reason this would be any different.
The other direction will be more difficult (and probably desired by more people) but the "line in" functionality will be the real game changer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30171196</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sick of being underestimated</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258733160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because "surfing the web" includes far more than the pejorative connotation you give it.  Hear a word you don't know?  Where do you go to look it up?  Concept in a conversation you're not familiar with?  Where do you go to look it up?  One of the greatest things about the web is that it's slowly removing our need to wonder about stuff.  (Notice I did not say capacity for wonder.  Being awestruck by a sunset is an entirely different form of wonder than wondering what dates Truman held the presidency.)  Surfing the web need not be just wasting time while you should be working; it also means *poof!* -&gt; knowledge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because " surfing the web " includes far more than the pejorative connotation you give it .
Hear a word you do n't know ?
Where do you go to look it up ?
Concept in a conversation you 're not familiar with ?
Where do you go to look it up ?
One of the greatest things about the web is that it 's slowly removing our need to wonder about stuff .
( Notice I did not say capacity for wonder .
Being awestruck by a sunset is an entirely different form of wonder than wondering what dates Truman held the presidency .
) Surfing the web need not be just wasting time while you should be working ; it also means * poof !
* - &gt; knowledge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because "surfing the web" includes far more than the pejorative connotation you give it.
Hear a word you don't know?
Where do you go to look it up?
Concept in a conversation you're not familiar with?
Where do you go to look it up?
One of the greatest things about the web is that it's slowly removing our need to wonder about stuff.
(Notice I did not say capacity for wonder.
Being awestruck by a sunset is an entirely different form of wonder than wondering what dates Truman held the presidency.
)  Surfing the web need not be just wasting time while you should be working; it also means *poof!
* -&gt; knowledge.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166440</id>
	<title>I for one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258636740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>welcome our new brain slug overlords...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>welcome our new brain slug overlords.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>welcome our new brain slug overlords...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166042</id>
	<title>Fascinating stuff...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258634940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I recently heard an NPR article about this kind of thing.</p><p>Using real time MRI, someone could be presented with flashcards of common objects (screwdriver, igloo, flower, etc).  When they thought about those objects, certain areas of the brain lit up.</p><p>The scientists said that when you think of a screwdriver, there isn't a single "screwdriver" area that lights up.  Instead, you think of how it looks, what it feels like in your hand, what it's used for.  You might think of construction workers, or your favorite screwdriver in your workbench at home.  So lots of areas in the brain "light up".</p><p>What's amazing to me is that it appeared to be the SAME AREAS for DIFFERENT people.</p><p>As an example of this, the NPR production assistant (who was just visiting and helping with the interview) got hooked up to the MRI and was shown the flashcards.  The computer, by looking at her brain, successfully guessed 10 out of 10.  Even though the computer "learned" from someone else!</p><p>I suppose someone who'd never seen a screwdriver before wouldn't have the same sort of response, so it's probably limited to people with the same cultural backgrounds.</p><p>Pretty neat stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I recently heard an NPR article about this kind of thing.Using real time MRI , someone could be presented with flashcards of common objects ( screwdriver , igloo , flower , etc ) .
When they thought about those objects , certain areas of the brain lit up.The scientists said that when you think of a screwdriver , there is n't a single " screwdriver " area that lights up .
Instead , you think of how it looks , what it feels like in your hand , what it 's used for .
You might think of construction workers , or your favorite screwdriver in your workbench at home .
So lots of areas in the brain " light up " .What 's amazing to me is that it appeared to be the SAME AREAS for DIFFERENT people.As an example of this , the NPR production assistant ( who was just visiting and helping with the interview ) got hooked up to the MRI and was shown the flashcards .
The computer , by looking at her brain , successfully guessed 10 out of 10 .
Even though the computer " learned " from someone else ! I suppose someone who 'd never seen a screwdriver before would n't have the same sort of response , so it 's probably limited to people with the same cultural backgrounds.Pretty neat stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I recently heard an NPR article about this kind of thing.Using real time MRI, someone could be presented with flashcards of common objects (screwdriver, igloo, flower, etc).
When they thought about those objects, certain areas of the brain lit up.The scientists said that when you think of a screwdriver, there isn't a single "screwdriver" area that lights up.
Instead, you think of how it looks, what it feels like in your hand, what it's used for.
You might think of construction workers, or your favorite screwdriver in your workbench at home.
So lots of areas in the brain "light up".What's amazing to me is that it appeared to be the SAME AREAS for DIFFERENT people.As an example of this, the NPR production assistant (who was just visiting and helping with the interview) got hooked up to the MRI and was shown the flashcards.
The computer, by looking at her brain, successfully guessed 10 out of 10.
Even though the computer "learned" from someone else!I suppose someone who'd never seen a screwdriver before wouldn't have the same sort of response, so it's probably limited to people with the same cultural backgrounds.Pretty neat stuff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168768</id>
	<title>Cool...</title>
	<author>doug141</author>
	<datestamp>1258660140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The department of pre-crime will be able to see who thinks screwdrivers are for stabbing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The department of pre-crime will be able to see who thinks screwdrivers are for stabbing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The department of pre-crime will be able to see who thinks screwdrivers are for stabbing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30213708</id>
	<title>Does this mean</title>
	<author>RivenAleem</author>
	<datestamp>1259078220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I will no longer need to actually move my head when playing my DK?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I will no longer need to actually move my head when playing my DK ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I will no longer need to actually move my head when playing my DK?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168280</id>
	<title>And in 2030</title>
	<author>DavMz</author>
	<datestamp>1258654140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Computer implants could control brains.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Computer implants could control brains .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Computer implants could control brains.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166550</id>
	<title>Re:Bad choice of killer app.</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1258637280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not a great composer, so I don't really know, but I don't think that the difficult part of composition is actually the transcription (sure, it's tedious, but I don't think it is the hard part).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not a great composer , so I do n't really know , but I do n't think that the difficult part of composition is actually the transcription ( sure , it 's tedious , but I do n't think it is the hard part ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not a great composer, so I don't really know, but I don't think that the difficult part of composition is actually the transcription (sure, it's tedious, but I don't think it is the hard part).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165750</id>
	<title>Re:Last Thing I Want</title>
	<author>EdZ</author>
	<datestamp>1258633500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Fortunately, feeding input directly into the brain is more difficult that reading output from it.</p></div><p>Not really. It's easily (ish) to stimulate a neuron externally using optical stimulation, but to read that state of that cell currently requires either implanting an electrode into the cell (generally shortens the lifespanof the cell to a few hours/minutes), or stimulating the cell to grow an axon onto a suitable biocompatable electrode (some research in this direction, no reliable results as of yet).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fortunately , feeding input directly into the brain is more difficult that reading output from it.Not really .
It 's easily ( ish ) to stimulate a neuron externally using optical stimulation , but to read that state of that cell currently requires either implanting an electrode into the cell ( generally shortens the lifespanof the cell to a few hours/minutes ) , or stimulating the cell to grow an axon onto a suitable biocompatable electrode ( some research in this direction , no reliable results as of yet ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fortunately, feeding input directly into the brain is more difficult that reading output from it.Not really.
It's easily (ish) to stimulate a neuron externally using optical stimulation, but to read that state of that cell currently requires either implanting an electrode into the cell (generally shortens the lifespanof the cell to a few hours/minutes), or stimulating the cell to grow an axon onto a suitable biocompatable electrode (some research in this direction, no reliable results as of yet).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168404</id>
	<title>Pah.  Prior art!</title>
	<author>Fished</author>
	<datestamp>1258655280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, way back in the day (1989?) I did a science project whereby I used testing of skin resistance to control a menu on a computer.  It was way primitive, and way slow, but it did work--if you carefully trained yourself to be able to control your tension level to raise and lower the needle.  Unfortunately, didn't win because nobody but me could make it work.  And besides, I didn't have a hypothesis.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , way back in the day ( 1989 ?
) I did a science project whereby I used testing of skin resistance to control a menu on a computer .
It was way primitive , and way slow , but it did work--if you carefully trained yourself to be able to control your tension level to raise and lower the needle .
Unfortunately , did n't win because nobody but me could make it work .
And besides , I did n't have a hypothesis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, way back in the day (1989?
) I did a science project whereby I used testing of skin resistance to control a menu on a computer.
It was way primitive, and way slow, but it did work--if you carefully trained yourself to be able to control your tension level to raise and lower the needle.
Unfortunately, didn't win because nobody but me could make it work.
And besides, I didn't have a hypothesis.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166508</id>
	<title>BLEH!!! Get that kid off my lawn</title>
	<author>smchris</author>
	<datestamp>1258637040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Honest to Dog, I swear we've been "just a decade away" from mass distribution of optical implants to aid the blind since the SEVENTIES!  I've given up on stories about the distribution of ALL brain interfaces that are "just a decade away (Really, trust me!)" until I see local news stories about my neighborhood hospital installing them and insurance paying for them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Honest to Dog , I swear we 've been " just a decade away " from mass distribution of optical implants to aid the blind since the SEVENTIES !
I 've given up on stories about the distribution of ALL brain interfaces that are " just a decade away ( Really , trust me !
) " until I see local news stories about my neighborhood hospital installing them and insurance paying for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Honest to Dog, I swear we've been "just a decade away" from mass distribution of optical implants to aid the blind since the SEVENTIES!
I've given up on stories about the distribution of ALL brain interfaces that are "just a decade away (Really, trust me!
)" until I see local news stories about my neighborhood hospital installing them and insurance paying for them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168508</id>
	<title>Re:Fascinating stuff...</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1258656420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, quite interesting. I wonder if the similar brain activity patterns could be explained merely by the motor functions related to said object, and the areas of the brain used for those functions being hard-wired. Usually brain scan interpretations are full of unresearched assumptions, but the similarities that you describe say a lot and rule out a lot of things, even without one having to make many assumptions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , quite interesting .
I wonder if the similar brain activity patterns could be explained merely by the motor functions related to said object , and the areas of the brain used for those functions being hard-wired .
Usually brain scan interpretations are full of unresearched assumptions , but the similarities that you describe say a lot and rule out a lot of things , even without one having to make many assumptions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, quite interesting.
I wonder if the similar brain activity patterns could be explained merely by the motor functions related to said object, and the areas of the brain used for those functions being hard-wired.
Usually brain scan interpretations are full of unresearched assumptions, but the similarities that you describe say a lot and rule out a lot of things, even without one having to make many assumptions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166642</id>
	<title>and if it's a nano-robot?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258637940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you won't have a choice.</p><p>it could theoretically enter your system without you even knowing, in your sleep perhaps, and activate inside your body. nano-censors/inputs could send/recieve data to you and control your actions. an inside source at the CIA told me that they have had this type of technology since at least 1995.</p><p>it is not beyond our controlling-every-action-we-do government to do this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you wo n't have a choice.it could theoretically enter your system without you even knowing , in your sleep perhaps , and activate inside your body .
nano-censors/inputs could send/recieve data to you and control your actions .
an inside source at the CIA told me that they have had this type of technology since at least 1995.it is not beyond our controlling-every-action-we-do government to do this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you won't have a choice.it could theoretically enter your system without you even knowing, in your sleep perhaps, and activate inside your body.
nano-censors/inputs could send/recieve data to you and control your actions.
an inside source at the CIA told me that they have had this type of technology since at least 1995.it is not beyond our controlling-every-action-we-do government to do this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166922</id>
	<title>Re:Bad choice of killer app.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258639740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>me too, im waiting for 1.1</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>me too , im waiting for 1.1</tokentext>
<sentencetext>me too, im waiting for 1.1</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169324</id>
	<title>Hamilton</title>
	<author>bluewolfcub</author>
	<datestamp>1258713900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bring on peter hamilton's neural nanonics

<a href="http://nightsdawn.wikia.com/wiki/Neural\_nanonics" title="wikia.com" rel="nofollow">http://nightsdawn.wikia.com/wiki/Neural\_nanonics</a> [wikia.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bring on peter hamilton 's neural nanonics http : //nightsdawn.wikia.com/wiki/Neural \ _nanonics [ wikia.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bring on peter hamilton's neural nanonics

http://nightsdawn.wikia.com/wiki/Neural\_nanonics [wikia.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166098</id>
	<title>Re:Let me know when...</title>
	<author>grcumb</author>
	<datestamp>1258635060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I can get direct neural input from the Playboy channel.</p></div><p>I can't imagine this being a good thing:</p><p> <strong>YOU:</strong> browsing slashdot over coffee.</p><p>[Stunning, sultry woman walks up.]</p><p> <strong>SHE:</strong> Excuse me, can you tell me the time?</p><p> <strong>YOUR BROWSER:</strong> [displays top 10 porntube results for stunning, sultry women.]</p><p> <strong>SHE:</strong> You sick fuck!</p><p>...</p><p> <strong>JUDGE:</strong> I sentence you to 6 months at Pumpinhole State Penitentiary.</p><p> <strong>YOUR BROWSER:</strong> [displays goat.se]</p><p>The phrase '<em>Try to think of baseball</em>' has never been more important.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can get direct neural input from the Playboy channel.I ca n't imagine this being a good thing : YOU : browsing slashdot over coffee .
[ Stunning , sultry woman walks up .
] SHE : Excuse me , can you tell me the time ?
YOUR BROWSER : [ displays top 10 porntube results for stunning , sultry women .
] SHE : You sick fuck ! .. .
JUDGE : I sentence you to 6 months at Pumpinhole State Penitentiary .
YOUR BROWSER : [ displays goat.se ] The phrase 'Try to think of baseball ' has never been more important .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can get direct neural input from the Playboy channel.I can't imagine this being a good thing: YOU: browsing slashdot over coffee.
[Stunning, sultry woman walks up.
] SHE: Excuse me, can you tell me the time?
YOUR BROWSER: [displays top 10 porntube results for stunning, sultry women.
] SHE: You sick fuck!...
JUDGE: I sentence you to 6 months at Pumpinhole State Penitentiary.
YOUR BROWSER: [displays goat.se]The phrase 'Try to think of baseball' has never been more important.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30170376</id>
	<title>Good up to a point</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1258728660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am all for interfacing with computers through brain waves, however they must keep the contact between the 2 physical and not develop<br>a wifi type, as it would be hard to "turn off the transmittion" I could see someone experiencing pain after an accident or maybe have mayhem in their brain at the moment they are hit with a heart attack, how would those particular moments be interpreted by the machine hooked up, as well...let's not go too far with this technology. I could well imagine a keyboard to say interface with a computer instead of typing but not to operate a car in traffic with many other cars on the road....that would be a little too much asking for trouble.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am all for interfacing with computers through brain waves , however they must keep the contact between the 2 physical and not developa wifi type , as it would be hard to " turn off the transmittion " I could see someone experiencing pain after an accident or maybe have mayhem in their brain at the moment they are hit with a heart attack , how would those particular moments be interpreted by the machine hooked up , as well...let 's not go too far with this technology .
I could well imagine a keyboard to say interface with a computer instead of typing but not to operate a car in traffic with many other cars on the road....that would be a little too much asking for trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am all for interfacing with computers through brain waves, however they must keep the contact between the 2 physical and not developa wifi type, as it would be hard to "turn off the transmittion" I could see someone experiencing pain after an accident or maybe have mayhem in their brain at the moment they are hit with a heart attack, how would those particular moments be interpreted by the machine hooked up, as well...let's not go too far with this technology.
I could well imagine a keyboard to say interface with a computer instead of typing but not to operate a car in traffic with many other cars on the road....that would be a little too much asking for trouble.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165622</id>
	<title>But my intel drivers don't work on my pc NOW!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258633020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>In the spirit of XKCD, should I get the chip installed in my brain and wait until Linux patches in support?

Or wait for an Open Source alternative?</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the spirit of XKCD , should I get the chip installed in my brain and wait until Linux patches in support ?
Or wait for an Open Source alternative ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the spirit of XKCD, should I get the chip installed in my brain and wait until Linux patches in support?
Or wait for an Open Source alternative?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166024</id>
	<title>Re:But my intel drivers don't work on my pc NOW!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258634820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so far the current kernel has native support for intel, in the spirit of the article, you should be good (assuming intel isn't going anywhere).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so far the current kernel has native support for intel , in the spirit of the article , you should be good ( assuming intel is n't going anywhere ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so far the current kernel has native support for intel, in the spirit of the article, you should be good (assuming intel isn't going anywhere).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168884</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sick of being underestimated</title>
	<author>FrankDrebin</author>
	<datestamp>1258750320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why, oh why does everyone at Intel think that people just want to 'surf the web' with whatever they happen to invent? </p></div><p>Because apparently doing stuff like floating-point division is out of the question?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why , oh why does everyone at Intel think that people just want to 'surf the web ' with whatever they happen to invent ?
Because apparently doing stuff like floating-point division is out of the question ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why, oh why does everyone at Intel think that people just want to 'surf the web' with whatever they happen to invent?
Because apparently doing stuff like floating-point division is out of the question?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165646</id>
	<title>Quick, someone high five me!</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1258633080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First Lasers, and soon brain implants! Today is full of win! Its the effin Future!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First Lasers , and soon brain implants !
Today is full of win !
Its the effin Future !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First Lasers, and soon brain implants!
Today is full of win!
Its the effin Future!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165782</id>
	<title>Re:But Unfortunately...</title>
	<author>thhamm</author>
	<datestamp>1258633680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Implants Could Control Computers By 2020<br>
Computer implants will control brains by 2019.</p></div><p>Now i'm confused. What will control what in Soviet Russia then, and when exactly?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Implants Could Control Computers By 2020 Computer implants will control brains by 2019.Now i 'm confused .
What will control what in Soviet Russia then , and when exactly ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Implants Could Control Computers By 2020
Computer implants will control brains by 2019.Now i'm confused.
What will control what in Soviet Russia then, and when exactly?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165632</id>
	<title>Oh well.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258633080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good thing the world is ending in 2012</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good thing the world is ending in 2012</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good thing the world is ending in 2012</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169490</id>
	<title>At last</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258716780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this mean I can have that neural interface for my flying car?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean I can have that neural interface for my flying car ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean I can have that neural interface for my flying car?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166784</id>
	<title>You know...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258638780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't want to have a video card, hard drive, or CPU that I can't easily upgrade and replace. Why would I want something that would require surgery to do that?</p><p>Oh. You're using a Creative Labs Brainblaster XL? Their new Brainblaster OMG has twice the bandwidth and three times the signal resolution.</p><p>Yeah, maybe you do get a better signal through hardwiring but lets see what happens in 5 years when I can buy the latest equipment and you are either stuck with the older tech or have to get your head sawn open</p><p>again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't want to have a video card , hard drive , or CPU that I ca n't easily upgrade and replace .
Why would I want something that would require surgery to do that ? Oh .
You 're using a Creative Labs Brainblaster XL ?
Their new Brainblaster OMG has twice the bandwidth and three times the signal resolution.Yeah , maybe you do get a better signal through hardwiring but lets see what happens in 5 years when I can buy the latest equipment and you are either stuck with the older tech or have to get your head sawn openagain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't want to have a video card, hard drive, or CPU that I can't easily upgrade and replace.
Why would I want something that would require surgery to do that?Oh.
You're using a Creative Labs Brainblaster XL?
Their new Brainblaster OMG has twice the bandwidth and three times the signal resolution.Yeah, maybe you do get a better signal through hardwiring but lets see what happens in 5 years when I can buy the latest equipment and you are either stuck with the older tech or have to get your head sawn openagain.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167996</id>
	<title>Re:But Unfortunately...</title>
	<author>mcrbids</author>
	<datestamp>1258650960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Yeah, that's why I'd never trust anything that could potentially write directly to my brain. Some sort of helmet thing might be uncomfortable, but at least you can rip it off if they (trojans / hackers / foreign agents) start getting frisky with your mind. Presuming that you have enough motor control left to do the ripping. Perhaps a panic button; hooked up to bladder control or something. (only partly joking)</i></p><p>Explain to me how potentially "writing directly to your brain" is functionally any different than manipulation through the control of information? Advertising works because when you advertise, people buy your shit. You might find this fact annoying, but it's true, and it's one of a million examples of human manipulation therefrom.</p><p>For another example, see "Ditto-Head" Rush Limbaugh supporter/worshippers. They are convinced that gubbmint can't do anything but tax and waste money. Listen to them! Never mind the "free society" protected by that very gubbmint...</p><p>You are already manipulated and controlled for fun and profit, and it's part of the social animals that is who we actually are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , that 's why I 'd never trust anything that could potentially write directly to my brain .
Some sort of helmet thing might be uncomfortable , but at least you can rip it off if they ( trojans / hackers / foreign agents ) start getting frisky with your mind .
Presuming that you have enough motor control left to do the ripping .
Perhaps a panic button ; hooked up to bladder control or something .
( only partly joking ) Explain to me how potentially " writing directly to your brain " is functionally any different than manipulation through the control of information ?
Advertising works because when you advertise , people buy your shit .
You might find this fact annoying , but it 's true , and it 's one of a million examples of human manipulation therefrom.For another example , see " Ditto-Head " Rush Limbaugh supporter/worshippers .
They are convinced that gubbmint ca n't do anything but tax and waste money .
Listen to them !
Never mind the " free society " protected by that very gubbmint...You are already manipulated and controlled for fun and profit , and it 's part of the social animals that is who we actually are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, that's why I'd never trust anything that could potentially write directly to my brain.
Some sort of helmet thing might be uncomfortable, but at least you can rip it off if they (trojans / hackers / foreign agents) start getting frisky with your mind.
Presuming that you have enough motor control left to do the ripping.
Perhaps a panic button; hooked up to bladder control or something.
(only partly joking)Explain to me how potentially "writing directly to your brain" is functionally any different than manipulation through the control of information?
Advertising works because when you advertise, people buy your shit.
You might find this fact annoying, but it's true, and it's one of a million examples of human manipulation therefrom.For another example, see "Ditto-Head" Rush Limbaugh supporter/worshippers.
They are convinced that gubbmint can't do anything but tax and waste money.
Listen to them!
Never mind the "free society" protected by that very gubbmint...You are already manipulated and controlled for fun and profit, and it's part of the social animals that is who we actually are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165802</id>
	<title>Input and Output?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258633740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The blurb appears to be an output from the brain to the computer.  The real power comes when the computer can output to the brain in a useful and integrated manner.  The the feedback loop would allow powerful new oportunities.</p><p>This is ironically the same time where mind-control through hacking the brain chip becomes a real problem.</p><p>A read-only system for the brain has the concern of others reading your mind but the mind-control comes with a read/write system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The blurb appears to be an output from the brain to the computer .
The real power comes when the computer can output to the brain in a useful and integrated manner .
The the feedback loop would allow powerful new oportunities.This is ironically the same time where mind-control through hacking the brain chip becomes a real problem.A read-only system for the brain has the concern of others reading your mind but the mind-control comes with a read/write system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The blurb appears to be an output from the brain to the computer.
The real power comes when the computer can output to the brain in a useful and integrated manner.
The the feedback loop would allow powerful new oportunities.This is ironically the same time where mind-control through hacking the brain chip becomes a real problem.A read-only system for the brain has the concern of others reading your mind but the mind-control comes with a read/write system.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168044</id>
	<title>Re:Bad choice of killer app.</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1258651620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Or art: Can't draw? Just visualize!</p></div><p>You know, that's an interesting point you bring up, because the most difficult part of drawing isn't moving your hand, it's learning to visualize. Non-artists just don't see all the details of an object when they look at it. As Maurice Grosser said, "The painter draws with his eyes, not with his hands. Whatever he sees, if he sees it clear, he can put it down, [with] no more muscular agility than it takes for him to write his name. Seeing clear is the important thing."<br> <br>
Same thing with music.  It is true, learning to put notes in their right places on paper and learning about harmony is a pain, but that is nothing compared to actually being able to hear all that stuff in your head.  Very few people can hear a song and keep track of what is going on in the baseline, melody and background instruments at the same time.  Coming up with your own that sound good together is even harder. Writing it down is the easy part.<br> <br>
In other words, thinking about things is the hard part.  If you can do that, expressing it in some form or another is relatively easy. Which of course, isn't to say it is 100\% easy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or art : Ca n't draw ?
Just visualize ! You know , that 's an interesting point you bring up , because the most difficult part of drawing is n't moving your hand , it 's learning to visualize .
Non-artists just do n't see all the details of an object when they look at it .
As Maurice Grosser said , " The painter draws with his eyes , not with his hands .
Whatever he sees , if he sees it clear , he can put it down , [ with ] no more muscular agility than it takes for him to write his name .
Seeing clear is the important thing .
" Same thing with music .
It is true , learning to put notes in their right places on paper and learning about harmony is a pain , but that is nothing compared to actually being able to hear all that stuff in your head .
Very few people can hear a song and keep track of what is going on in the baseline , melody and background instruments at the same time .
Coming up with your own that sound good together is even harder .
Writing it down is the easy part .
In other words , thinking about things is the hard part .
If you can do that , expressing it in some form or another is relatively easy .
Which of course , is n't to say it is 100 \ % easy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or art: Can't draw?
Just visualize!You know, that's an interesting point you bring up, because the most difficult part of drawing isn't moving your hand, it's learning to visualize.
Non-artists just don't see all the details of an object when they look at it.
As Maurice Grosser said, "The painter draws with his eyes, not with his hands.
Whatever he sees, if he sees it clear, he can put it down, [with] no more muscular agility than it takes for him to write his name.
Seeing clear is the important thing.
" 
Same thing with music.
It is true, learning to put notes in their right places on paper and learning about harmony is a pain, but that is nothing compared to actually being able to hear all that stuff in your head.
Very few people can hear a song and keep track of what is going on in the baseline, melody and background instruments at the same time.
Coming up with your own that sound good together is even harder.
Writing it down is the easy part.
In other words, thinking about things is the hard part.
If you can do that, expressing it in some form or another is relatively easy.
Which of course, isn't to say it is 100\% easy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165756</id>
	<title>Only useful for recreational web surfing.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258633500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This will be useless in a business setting.  I don't know how I'm going to look up online documentation when my browser is always searching for pictures of Megan Fox.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This will be useless in a business setting .
I do n't know how I 'm going to look up online documentation when my browser is always searching for pictures of Megan Fox .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will be useless in a business setting.
I don't know how I'm going to look up online documentation when my browser is always searching for pictures of Megan Fox.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166158</id>
	<title>How I see the FBI using it</title>
	<author>FunPika</author>
	<datestamp>1258635360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1. Arrest suspected terrorist. <br>
2. Force a chip into his head if he does not already have one. <br>
3. Connect the chip to a device that will show whatever you are thinking on a screen. <br>
4. Interrogate the suspected terrorist, even if he won't talk he will likely be stupid enough to think about the answers they want. <br>
5. ????? <br>
6. Profit!!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Arrest suspected terrorist .
2. Force a chip into his head if he does not already have one .
3. Connect the chip to a device that will show whatever you are thinking on a screen .
4. Interrogate the suspected terrorist , even if he wo n't talk he will likely be stupid enough to think about the answers they want .
5. ? ? ? ? ?
6. Profit ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Arrest suspected terrorist.
2. Force a chip into his head if he does not already have one.
3. Connect the chip to a device that will show whatever you are thinking on a screen.
4. Interrogate the suspected terrorist, even if he won't talk he will likely be stupid enough to think about the answers they want.
5. ?????
6. Profit!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30171380</id>
	<title>Goatse?</title>
	<author>phorm</author>
	<datestamp>1258734060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm, well I would think that in this case being goatse'ed, rickrolled or other such things would really, really suck. It may be that there's not a tech level where you could overwrite somebody's brain via such an implant, or steal information from it, but it would probably be easier to send somebody to a matrix-like VR and trick them with a bad URL.</p><p>Hmmm... what's this "twogirls1cup.vr" file.</p><p>For that matter, prankers could have had a lot of fun with a holodeck too. April fool's would surely be a great thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , well I would think that in this case being goatse'ed , rickrolled or other such things would really , really suck .
It may be that there 's not a tech level where you could overwrite somebody 's brain via such an implant , or steal information from it , but it would probably be easier to send somebody to a matrix-like VR and trick them with a bad URL.Hmmm... what 's this " twogirls1cup.vr " file.For that matter , prankers could have had a lot of fun with a holodeck too .
April fool 's would surely be a great thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, well I would think that in this case being goatse'ed, rickrolled or other such things would really, really suck.
It may be that there's not a tech level where you could overwrite somebody's brain via such an implant, or steal information from it, but it would probably be easier to send somebody to a matrix-like VR and trick them with a bad URL.Hmmm... what's this "twogirls1cup.vr" file.For that matter, prankers could have had a lot of fun with a holodeck too.
April fool's would surely be a great thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168542</id>
	<title>Re:Not for me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258656660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd hardly refer to it as a sanctuary, our simple human brains are a cage we have yet to free ourselves of.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd hardly refer to it as a sanctuary , our simple human brains are a cage we have yet to free ourselves of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd hardly refer to it as a sanctuary, our simple human brains are a cage we have yet to free ourselves of.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30170854</id>
	<title>Re:But Unfortunately...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258731480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just build a hat out of tin foil to block communication with the chip.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just build a hat out of tin foil to block communication with the chip .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just build a hat out of tin foil to block communication with the chip.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166066</id>
	<title>Re:Peter Hamilton Sci-Fi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258635000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hmmm... Neuromancer was written by William Gibson in 1984 and describes brain-computer interfaces (and more).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmmm... Neuromancer was written by William Gibson in 1984 and describes brain-computer interfaces ( and more ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmmm... Neuromancer was written by William Gibson in 1984 and describes brain-computer interfaces (and more).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168750</id>
	<title>Obligatory BTTF</title>
	<author>Lord\_Breetai</author>
	<datestamp>1258660020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"Wait, Dad, you mean you used to have to move your arm to change the channel on the TV?"</i></p><p>Video Game Boy #2 (John Thornton): "This is a video game."<br>Video Game Boy #1 (Elijah Wood): "I got it working."<br>Video Game Boy #2: "My dad taught me about these."<br>Marty: "It is Wild Gunman."<br>Video Game Boy #2: "How do you play this thing?"<br>Marty: "I'll show you kid. I'm a crack shot at this."<br>Video Game Boy #1: "You mean you have to use your hands?"<br>Video Game Boy #2: "That's like a baby's toy."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Wait , Dad , you mean you used to have to move your arm to change the channel on the TV ?
" Video Game Boy # 2 ( John Thornton ) : " This is a video game .
" Video Game Boy # 1 ( Elijah Wood ) : " I got it working .
" Video Game Boy # 2 : " My dad taught me about these .
" Marty : " It is Wild Gunman .
" Video Game Boy # 2 : " How do you play this thing ?
" Marty : " I 'll show you kid .
I 'm a crack shot at this .
" Video Game Boy # 1 : " You mean you have to use your hands ?
" Video Game Boy # 2 : " That 's like a baby 's toy .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Wait, Dad, you mean you used to have to move your arm to change the channel on the TV?
"Video Game Boy #2 (John Thornton): "This is a video game.
"Video Game Boy #1 (Elijah Wood): "I got it working.
"Video Game Boy #2: "My dad taught me about these.
"Marty: "It is Wild Gunman.
"Video Game Boy #2: "How do you play this thing?
"Marty: "I'll show you kid.
I'm a crack shot at this.
"Video Game Boy #1: "You mean you have to use your hands?
"Video Game Boy #2: "That's like a baby's toy.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169216</id>
	<title>Re:Last Thing I Want</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258712580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They already can use low frequency sound waves for that one.</p><p>http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/22746/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They already can use low frequency sound waves for that one.http : //www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/22746/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They already can use low frequency sound waves for that one.http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/22746/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168178</id>
	<title>Re:Let me know when...nike jordan shoes,handbags,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258652820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>everybody should go to his site but don't buy anything. perhaps we can slashdot it and drive up his bandwidth costs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>everybody should go to his site but do n't buy anything .
perhaps we can slashdot it and drive up his bandwidth costs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>everybody should go to his site but don't buy anything.
perhaps we can slashdot it and drive up his bandwidth costs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168244</id>
	<title>Re:The Progress of Lazyness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258653420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the distant future...</p><p>"..."</p><p>"..."</p><p>Son physically reels.  "..."</p><p>"We use to have to use words to communicate."</p><p>"!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the distant future... " ... " " ... " Son physically reels .
" ... " " We use to have to use words to communicate. " " !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the distant future..."...""..."Son physically reels.
"...""We use to have to use words to communicate.""!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167302</id>
	<title>Re:Why implants?</title>
	<author>arielCo</author>
	<datestamp>1258642920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm wondering about complications with cheap / knock-off implants or a sloppy job by some hack, much like what happens with breast implants.
</p><p>Also, you can watch the first <em>few minutes</em> of Johnny Mnemonic (I don't know if the scene is in Gibson's original), where his friend Jane has fits because of her el-cheapo reflex boosting implants.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm wondering about complications with cheap / knock-off implants or a sloppy job by some hack , much like what happens with breast implants .
Also , you can watch the first few minutes of Johnny Mnemonic ( I do n't know if the scene is in Gibson 's original ) , where his friend Jane has fits because of her el-cheapo reflex boosting implants .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm wondering about complications with cheap / knock-off implants or a sloppy job by some hack, much like what happens with breast implants.
Also, you can watch the first few minutes of Johnny Mnemonic (I don't know if the scene is in Gibson's original), where his friend Jane has fits because of her el-cheapo reflex boosting implants.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168956</id>
	<title>Re:But Unfortunately...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258708320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I said the same exact thing to members of my LUG on this subject. On my head (little conductive cream on the temples perhaps) with Biofeedback contacts (wireless by the time we got this sophisticated with the hardware interface) sure. "IN" my head...pick a cheek and bite my ass!!! I mentioned it a moment ago, BIOFEEDBACK! Try converting the existing interfaces we already have (removable adhesive contact pads wired  to a PC). The means of contact is non-invasive (or permanent), and can end the moment you decide to terminate the session. As to the efficacy, having been to many such sessions, I can say that "I" believe it has merit. And when combined with many yogic principles (breathe control, concentration) works wonders on your overall sense of being.</p><p>In any case, I believe the introduction of neural-implants would ultimately mean the end of the concept of personal freedom. Such sophisticated hardware must cost astronomical sums of money. That being the case, the manufacturers would most likely subsidize the cost by selling "commercial thought time" (any number of commercials totaling about 8 hrs a day) to media corporations. It would only be a matter of time before some schmuck figured out how to hack people's bioware, or Starbucks bought the right to pump commercials into your cerebral cortex, and you would have no choice in the matter.</p><p>-The Mgt</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I said the same exact thing to members of my LUG on this subject .
On my head ( little conductive cream on the temples perhaps ) with Biofeedback contacts ( wireless by the time we got this sophisticated with the hardware interface ) sure .
" IN " my head...pick a cheek and bite my ass ! ! !
I mentioned it a moment ago , BIOFEEDBACK !
Try converting the existing interfaces we already have ( removable adhesive contact pads wired to a PC ) .
The means of contact is non-invasive ( or permanent ) , and can end the moment you decide to terminate the session .
As to the efficacy , having been to many such sessions , I can say that " I " believe it has merit .
And when combined with many yogic principles ( breathe control , concentration ) works wonders on your overall sense of being.In any case , I believe the introduction of neural-implants would ultimately mean the end of the concept of personal freedom .
Such sophisticated hardware must cost astronomical sums of money .
That being the case , the manufacturers would most likely subsidize the cost by selling " commercial thought time " ( any number of commercials totaling about 8 hrs a day ) to media corporations .
It would only be a matter of time before some schmuck figured out how to hack people 's bioware , or Starbucks bought the right to pump commercials into your cerebral cortex , and you would have no choice in the matter.-The Mgt</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I said the same exact thing to members of my LUG on this subject.
On my head (little conductive cream on the temples perhaps) with Biofeedback contacts (wireless by the time we got this sophisticated with the hardware interface) sure.
"IN" my head...pick a cheek and bite my ass!!!
I mentioned it a moment ago, BIOFEEDBACK!
Try converting the existing interfaces we already have (removable adhesive contact pads wired  to a PC).
The means of contact is non-invasive (or permanent), and can end the moment you decide to terminate the session.
As to the efficacy, having been to many such sessions, I can say that "I" believe it has merit.
And when combined with many yogic principles (breathe control, concentration) works wonders on your overall sense of being.In any case, I believe the introduction of neural-implants would ultimately mean the end of the concept of personal freedom.
Such sophisticated hardware must cost astronomical sums of money.
That being the case, the manufacturers would most likely subsidize the cost by selling "commercial thought time" (any number of commercials totaling about 8 hrs a day) to media corporations.
It would only be a matter of time before some schmuck figured out how to hack people's bioware, or Starbucks bought the right to pump commercials into your cerebral cortex, and you would have no choice in the matter.-The Mgt</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165696</id>
	<title>Why implants?</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1258633320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do people insist on looking towards devices that need to be surgically implanted to operate?</p><p>Sure the interface is more difficult when it is outside the skull, but the barriers to adoption would be much lower also, would they not?  Not to mention support, upgrades, product life cycle, etc.</p><p>Are they really that shortsighted?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do people insist on looking towards devices that need to be surgically implanted to operate ? Sure the interface is more difficult when it is outside the skull , but the barriers to adoption would be much lower also , would they not ?
Not to mention support , upgrades , product life cycle , etc.Are they really that shortsighted ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do people insist on looking towards devices that need to be surgically implanted to operate?Sure the interface is more difficult when it is outside the skull, but the barriers to adoption would be much lower also, would they not?
Not to mention support, upgrades, product life cycle, etc.Are they really that shortsighted?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166560</id>
	<title>Re:Peter Hamilton Sci-Fi</title>
	<author>rossdee</author>
	<datestamp>1258637340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Arthur C Clarke, the braincap, 3001</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Arthur C Clarke , the braincap , 3001</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Arthur C Clarke, the braincap, 3001</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167252</id>
	<title>I can't wait for the technical support</title>
	<author>Lord\_of\_the\_nerf</author>
	<datestamp>1258642560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Have you tried rebooting? Just put the red button at the base of your neck."<p>

*thud*</p><p>

"Sir..?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Have you tried rebooting ?
Just put the red button at the base of your neck .
" * thud * " Sir.. ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Have you tried rebooting?
Just put the red button at the base of your neck.
"

*thud*

"Sir..?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167396</id>
	<title>Re:But Unfortunately...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258644000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>We can protect it so it needs to do "sudo write -brain" instead.<br>
We'll only need to pay MS royalties.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We can protect it so it needs to do " sudo write -brain " instead .
We 'll only need to pay MS royalties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We can protect it so it needs to do "sudo write -brain" instead.
We'll only need to pay MS royalties.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166504</id>
	<title>Better yet...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258637040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me know when I can flood your brain with goatse and tubgirl from the comfort of my command line...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me know when I can flood your brain with goatse and tubgirl from the comfort of my command line.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me know when I can flood your brain with goatse and tubgirl from the comfort of my command line...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169724</id>
	<title>Re:Last Thing I Want</title>
	<author>carvalhao</author>
	<datestamp>1258720020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am not a neurosomething, but what we've been seeing seems to indicate differently. The brain is hugely adaptable on it's own to new input sources, as we have been shown by the hability do adapt do hearing and sight replacement devices. The systems we have for reading thoughts are nowhere nearly as adaptable to our individual differences.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am not a neurosomething , but what we 've been seeing seems to indicate differently .
The brain is hugely adaptable on it 's own to new input sources , as we have been shown by the hability do adapt do hearing and sight replacement devices .
The systems we have for reading thoughts are nowhere nearly as adaptable to our individual differences .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am not a neurosomething, but what we've been seeing seems to indicate differently.
The brain is hugely adaptable on it's own to new input sources, as we have been shown by the hability do adapt do hearing and sight replacement devices.
The systems we have for reading thoughts are nowhere nearly as adaptable to our individual differences.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165854</id>
	<title>Re:Why implants?</title>
	<author>davburns</author>
	<datestamp>1258634040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I was thinking that, too.
</p><p>
The oldest computer I have around is a 1990 Amiga 500; I mostly use new kit, of course.  Anyone who gets an implant is going to be stuck with it pretty much for life, or commit to brain surgery every 3-5 years to install the newer one.
</p><p>
On the other hand, a 'trode net or hat would seem doable; sign me up for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was thinking that , too .
The oldest computer I have around is a 1990 Amiga 500 ; I mostly use new kit , of course .
Anyone who gets an implant is going to be stuck with it pretty much for life , or commit to brain surgery every 3-5 years to install the newer one .
On the other hand , a 'trode net or hat would seem doable ; sign me up for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I was thinking that, too.
The oldest computer I have around is a 1990 Amiga 500; I mostly use new kit, of course.
Anyone who gets an implant is going to be stuck with it pretty much for life, or commit to brain surgery every 3-5 years to install the newer one.
On the other hand, a 'trode net or hat would seem doable; sign me up for that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166240</id>
	<title>tro7L</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258635780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">Of business and and was taken over *BSD but FreeBSD first organization guests. Some people users. This is lesson and dying. See? It's This mistake or ARE ALMOST Shout the loudest From a technical it racist for a troubled OS. Now and/or distribute to say there have good to write you Lay down paper you should bring by the politickers About bylaws and its long term</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of business and and was taken over * BSD but FreeBSD first organization guests .
Some people users .
This is lesson and dying .
See ? It 's This mistake or ARE ALMOST Shout the loudest From a technical it racist for a troubled OS .
Now and/or distribute to say there have good to write you Lay down paper you should bring by the politickers About bylaws and its long term [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of business and and was taken over *BSD but FreeBSD first organization guests.
Some people users.
This is lesson and dying.
See? It's This mistake or ARE ALMOST Shout the loudest From a technical it racist for a troubled OS.
Now and/or distribute to say there have good to write you Lay down paper you should bring by the politickers About bylaws and its long term [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167632</id>
	<title>I wonder...</title>
	<author>Interoperable</author>
	<datestamp>1258646880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>what a segmentation fault <i>feels</i> like...</htmltext>
<tokenext>what a segmentation fault feels like.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what a segmentation fault feels like...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166278</id>
	<title>...The same brain patterns...</title>
	<author>Helldesk Hound</author>
	<datestamp>1258636020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if this means that if a scientist implanted this sort of implant into an animal that we would be able to figure out what it is thinking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this means that if a scientist implanted this sort of implant into an animal that we would be able to figure out what it is thinking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if this means that if a scientist implanted this sort of implant into an animal that we would be able to figure out what it is thinking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165738</id>
	<title>They just want this to plug the analog hole</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258633500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And get this, whenever you are streaming full rez on the neural link, they shutdown your eyes and ears. And you don't want to know where they stick the dongle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And get this , whenever you are streaming full rez on the neural link , they shutdown your eyes and ears .
And you do n't want to know where they stick the dongle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And get this, whenever you are streaming full rez on the neural link, they shutdown your eyes and ears.
And you don't want to know where they stick the dongle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166686</id>
	<title>Here is wisdom...</title>
	<author>bubezleeb</author>
	<datestamp>1258638240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads.
And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

I feel an Iron Maiden riff coming on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And he causeth all , both small and great , rich and poor , free and bond , to receive a mark in their right hand , or in their foreheads .
And that no man might buy or sell , save he that had the mark , or the name of the beast , or the number of his name .
I feel an Iron Maiden riff coming on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads.
And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
I feel an Iron Maiden riff coming on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167652</id>
	<title>Re:But Unfortunately...</title>
	<author>Metasquares</author>
	<datestamp>1258647120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Soviet Russia, brain implants will control YOU.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Russia , brain implants will control YOU .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Russia, brain implants will control YOU.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166100</id>
	<title>Re:But Unfortunately...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258635120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Computer implants will control brains by 2019.</p></div><p>

Yeah, that's why I'd never trust anything that could potentially write directly to my brain. Some sort of helmet thing might be uncomfortable, but at least you can rip it off if they (trojans / hackers / foreign agents) start getting frisky with your mind. Presuming that you have enough motor control left to do the ripping. Perhaps a panic button; hooked up to bladder control or something. (only partly joking) <br> <br>

Controlling machines with thought is brilliant though, and I'm all for it. Presuming that the thing doing the controlling does feedback through skin responses or a HUD on an external display.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Computer implants will control brains by 2019 .
Yeah , that 's why I 'd never trust anything that could potentially write directly to my brain .
Some sort of helmet thing might be uncomfortable , but at least you can rip it off if they ( trojans / hackers / foreign agents ) start getting frisky with your mind .
Presuming that you have enough motor control left to do the ripping .
Perhaps a panic button ; hooked up to bladder control or something .
( only partly joking ) Controlling machines with thought is brilliant though , and I 'm all for it .
Presuming that the thing doing the controlling does feedback through skin responses or a HUD on an external display .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Computer implants will control brains by 2019.
Yeah, that's why I'd never trust anything that could potentially write directly to my brain.
Some sort of helmet thing might be uncomfortable, but at least you can rip it off if they (trojans / hackers / foreign agents) start getting frisky with your mind.
Presuming that you have enough motor control left to do the ripping.
Perhaps a panic button; hooked up to bladder control or something.
(only partly joking)  

Controlling machines with thought is brilliant though, and I'm all for it.
Presuming that the thing doing the controlling does feedback through skin responses or a HUD on an external display.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166288</id>
	<title>Re:Why implants?</title>
	<author>kenji.toyama</author>
	<datestamp>1258636080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would be a lab rat for such experiment. I think improving the human body is a nice idea to me. I'd love to have a memory card slot in my skull to be able to remember pretty much everything else that my brain can't. Or maybe an ALU to perform very fast calculations....</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would be a lab rat for such experiment .
I think improving the human body is a nice idea to me .
I 'd love to have a memory card slot in my skull to be able to remember pretty much everything else that my brain ca n't .
Or maybe an ALU to perform very fast calculations... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would be a lab rat for such experiment.
I think improving the human body is a nice idea to me.
I'd love to have a memory card slot in my skull to be able to remember pretty much everything else that my brain can't.
Or maybe an ALU to perform very fast calculations....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167470</id>
	<title>Re:The Progress of Lazyness</title>
	<author>Dachannien</author>
	<datestamp>1258644720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"That's nothing, son. Great-Grandpa had to actually get up off the sofa and move to the TV to turn a dial."</p></div><p>"Dad?  What the hell is a dial?"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" That 's nothing , son .
Great-Grandpa had to actually get up off the sofa and move to the TV to turn a dial. " " Dad ?
What the hell is a dial ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"That's nothing, son.
Great-Grandpa had to actually get up off the sofa and move to the TV to turn a dial.""Dad?
What the hell is a dial?
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165748</id>
	<title>What do men think?</title>
	<author>Obble</author>
	<datestamp>1258633500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What ever you do, dont think of a beautiful girl on a nudist beach.  Now you will be force to control your thoughts, so think happy thoughts like flowers, puppies and little children,
oops,  not little children you pervert!

This is a very bad idea to be able to surf like that imo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What ever you do , dont think of a beautiful girl on a nudist beach .
Now you will be force to control your thoughts , so think happy thoughts like flowers , puppies and little children , oops , not little children you pervert !
This is a very bad idea to be able to surf like that imo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What ever you do, dont think of a beautiful girl on a nudist beach.
Now you will be force to control your thoughts, so think happy thoughts like flowers, puppies and little children,
oops,  not little children you pervert!
This is a very bad idea to be able to surf like that imo.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166206</id>
	<title>I call</title>
	<author>Dunbal</author>
	<datestamp>1258635600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bullshit.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Oh, the "silicon" part of the technology may be ready. However any foreign body inside a human body is susceptible to 1) chronic inflammation (which isn't so bad if it's around the metal holding your shattered bones together, after all, you can always take the metal out or at worst amputate the limb) and b) infection.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Now, hands up who is willing to have a device implanted in their brain that might cause permanent brain damage, bacterial meningitis (and all of its sequellae) or death?</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Lab rats, as usual, will have the advantage (?) of having their intellect enhanced with implants long, long before we humans will.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bullshit .
      Oh , the " silicon " part of the technology may be ready .
However any foreign body inside a human body is susceptible to 1 ) chronic inflammation ( which is n't so bad if it 's around the metal holding your shattered bones together , after all , you can always take the metal out or at worst amputate the limb ) and b ) infection .
      Now , hands up who is willing to have a device implanted in their brain that might cause permanent brain damage , bacterial meningitis ( and all of its sequellae ) or death ?
      Lab rats , as usual , will have the advantage ( ?
) of having their intellect enhanced with implants long , long before we humans will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bullshit.
      Oh, the "silicon" part of the technology may be ready.
However any foreign body inside a human body is susceptible to 1) chronic inflammation (which isn't so bad if it's around the metal holding your shattered bones together, after all, you can always take the metal out or at worst amputate the limb) and b) infection.
      Now, hands up who is willing to have a device implanted in their brain that might cause permanent brain damage, bacterial meningitis (and all of its sequellae) or death?
      Lab rats, as usual, will have the advantage (?
) of having their intellect enhanced with implants long, long before we humans will.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169830</id>
	<title>Neuroinformatics road to 2020</title>
	<author>Kensai7</author>
	<datestamp>1258721880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's time to jump on the Neuroinformatics bandwagon...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's time to jump on the Neuroinformatics bandwagon.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's time to jump on the Neuroinformatics bandwagon...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167594</id>
	<title>...implants controling computers by 2020...</title>
	<author>s0litaire</author>
	<datestamp>1258646280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>Well that's not that hard to imagine, since silicone implants have been controlling men's minds since the early 60's...</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well that 's not that hard to imagine , since silicone implants have been controlling men 's minds since the early 60 's.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well that's not that hard to imagine, since silicone implants have been controlling men's minds since the early 60's...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169094</id>
	<title>Re:Fascinating stuff...</title>
	<author>pipingguy</author>
	<datestamp>1258711200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>When they thought about those objects, certain areas of the brain lit up.</i> <br> <br>

It's been done. I am now going to make you think of the actual temperature needed to liquefy atmospheric air (on earth), Mozart and why worms are more visible after rain.

<br> <br>
Did it work?</htmltext>
<tokenext>When they thought about those objects , certain areas of the brain lit up .
It 's been done .
I am now going to make you think of the actual temperature needed to liquefy atmospheric air ( on earth ) , Mozart and why worms are more visible after rain .
Did it work ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When they thought about those objects, certain areas of the brain lit up.
It's been done.
I am now going to make you think of the actual temperature needed to liquefy atmospheric air (on earth), Mozart and why worms are more visible after rain.
Did it work?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166120</id>
	<title>Re:Last Thing I Want</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1258635180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please God no!
<br> <br>
I already have nightmares about Snuggies and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shamwow#ShamWow.21" title="wikipedia.org">ShamWows</a> [wikipedia.org] carrying me off into the night. The last thing I want is more product presence on my mind!
<br> <br>
Though, on second thought, the dreams with Erin Esurance aren't all that bad<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please God no !
I already have nightmares about Snuggies and ShamWows [ wikipedia.org ] carrying me off into the night .
The last thing I want is more product presence on my mind !
Though , on second thought , the dreams with Erin Esurance are n't all that bad ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please God no!
I already have nightmares about Snuggies and ShamWows [wikipedia.org] carrying me off into the night.
The last thing I want is more product presence on my mind!
Though, on second thought, the dreams with Erin Esurance aren't all that bad ....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169162</id>
	<title>Re:But Unfortunately...</title>
	<author>Krneki</author>
	<datestamp>1258711980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Computer implants will control brains by 2019.</p></div><p>

Yeah, that's why I'd never trust anything that could potentially write directly to my brain. Some sort of helmet thing might be uncomfortable, but at least you can rip it off if they (trojans / hackers / foreign agents) start getting frisky with your mind. Presuming that you have enough motor control left to do the ripping. Perhaps a panic button; hooked up to bladder control or something. (only partly joking) <br>
 <br>
Controlling machines with thought is brilliant though, and I'm all for it. Presuming that the thing doing the controlling does feedback through skin responses or a HUD on an external display.
</p></div><p>Your brains are already hacked on daily base. The exploit is called advertising.

The best part is, you don't even know your needs are implanted. </p><p>


Have a nice holiday.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Computer implants will control brains by 2019 .
Yeah , that 's why I 'd never trust anything that could potentially write directly to my brain .
Some sort of helmet thing might be uncomfortable , but at least you can rip it off if they ( trojans / hackers / foreign agents ) start getting frisky with your mind .
Presuming that you have enough motor control left to do the ripping .
Perhaps a panic button ; hooked up to bladder control or something .
( only partly joking ) Controlling machines with thought is brilliant though , and I 'm all for it .
Presuming that the thing doing the controlling does feedback through skin responses or a HUD on an external display .
Your brains are already hacked on daily base .
The exploit is called advertising .
The best part is , you do n't even know your needs are implanted .
Have a nice holiday .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Computer implants will control brains by 2019.
Yeah, that's why I'd never trust anything that could potentially write directly to my brain.
Some sort of helmet thing might be uncomfortable, but at least you can rip it off if they (trojans / hackers / foreign agents) start getting frisky with your mind.
Presuming that you have enough motor control left to do the ripping.
Perhaps a panic button; hooked up to bladder control or something.
(only partly joking) 
 
Controlling machines with thought is brilliant though, and I'm all for it.
Presuming that the thing doing the controlling does feedback through skin responses or a HUD on an external display.
Your brains are already hacked on daily base.
The exploit is called advertising.
The best part is, you don't even know your needs are implanted.
Have a nice holiday.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169288</id>
	<title>Re:Don't get too carried away</title>
	<author>pipingguy</author>
	<datestamp>1258713480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good points. But can you imagine an engineering designer (assuming that said designer had multiple ideas in his head) having to deal with this?<br> <br>
I can tell you from personal experience that competent design quite often takes the old "sketching on an envelope" and then further refining the idea.
<br> <br>
When I have an idea I reach for a pencil.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good points .
But can you imagine an engineering designer ( assuming that said designer had multiple ideas in his head ) having to deal with this ?
I can tell you from personal experience that competent design quite often takes the old " sketching on an envelope " and then further refining the idea .
When I have an idea I reach for a pencil .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good points.
But can you imagine an engineering designer (assuming that said designer had multiple ideas in his head) having to deal with this?
I can tell you from personal experience that competent design quite often takes the old "sketching on an envelope" and then further refining the idea.
When I have an idea I reach for a pencil.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167536</id>
	<title>Re:Bad choice of killer app.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258645680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's all a marketing conspiracy.  see cell phones will give you the brain cancer and when they are already in your head taking the tumors out then you can have the implants put in.  can't afford the cancer surgery?  that's fine, we'll just put this device in your skull during the same surgery and you can subsidize the medical costs through neural advertising.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's all a marketing conspiracy .
see cell phones will give you the brain cancer and when they are already in your head taking the tumors out then you can have the implants put in .
ca n't afford the cancer surgery ?
that 's fine , we 'll just put this device in your skull during the same surgery and you can subsidize the medical costs through neural advertising .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's all a marketing conspiracy.
see cell phones will give you the brain cancer and when they are already in your head taking the tumors out then you can have the implants put in.
can't afford the cancer surgery?
that's fine, we'll just put this device in your skull during the same surgery and you can subsidize the medical costs through neural advertising.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165836</id>
	<title>Better training</title>
	<author>falckon</author>
	<datestamp>1258633920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think training it to react to what you are thinking about is the best idea. It should be the combination of the words you're thinking about and the intent to write it down on the computer. This way you can still have mental tangents without having to worry about constantly turning off the device.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think training it to react to what you are thinking about is the best idea .
It should be the combination of the words you 're thinking about and the intent to write it down on the computer .
This way you can still have mental tangents without having to worry about constantly turning off the device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think training it to react to what you are thinking about is the best idea.
It should be the combination of the words you're thinking about and the intent to write it down on the computer.
This way you can still have mental tangents without having to worry about constantly turning off the device.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166384</id>
	<title>Depending on the OS, maybe a lobotomy</title>
	<author>swamp boy</author>
	<datestamp>1258636500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, a brain implant might be the state of the art for some operating systems, but a lobotomy is probably the more appropriate procedure for Windows users.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , a brain implant might be the state of the art for some operating systems , but a lobotomy is probably the more appropriate procedure for Windows users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, a brain implant might be the state of the art for some operating systems, but a lobotomy is probably the more appropriate procedure for Windows users.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168314</id>
	<title>Re:Not for me</title>
	<author>Tibia1</author>
	<datestamp>1258654440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Image the damage one of these so called "automobiles" could do to me and my family. Sure, they are faster and every will use them, but think of the dangers!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Image the damage one of these so called " automobiles " could do to me and my family .
Sure , they are faster and every will use them , but think of the dangers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Image the damage one of these so called "automobiles" could do to me and my family.
Sure, they are faster and every will use them, but think of the dangers!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166982</id>
	<title>Re:Why implants?</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1258640220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The oldest computer I have around is a 1990 Amiga 500; I mostly use new kit, of course. Anyone who gets an implant is going to be stuck with it pretty much for life, or commit to brain surgery every 3-5 years to install the newer one.</p></div><p>"By 2020" is another way of saying "this technology is 10 years away"<br>Then remember that "10 years away" has effectively become a cliche in the world of innovation.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The oldest computer I have around is a 1990 Amiga 500 ; I mostly use new kit , of course .
Anyone who gets an implant is going to be stuck with it pretty much for life , or commit to brain surgery every 3-5 years to install the newer one .
" By 2020 " is another way of saying " this technology is 10 years away " Then remember that " 10 years away " has effectively become a cliche in the world of innovation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The oldest computer I have around is a 1990 Amiga 500; I mostly use new kit, of course.
Anyone who gets an implant is going to be stuck with it pretty much for life, or commit to brain surgery every 3-5 years to install the newer one.
"By 2020" is another way of saying "this technology is 10 years away"Then remember that "10 years away" has effectively become a cliche in the world of innovation.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166076</id>
	<title>Re:Why implants?</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1258635000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>RFID doesn't need a power source in it...</htmltext>
<tokenext>RFID does n't need a power source in it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RFID doesn't need a power source in it...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169464</id>
	<title>Re:Last Thing I Want</title>
	<author>Nautical Insanity</author>
	<datestamp>1258716480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You make a good point. However, I meant that getting useful input is more difficult than getting useful output. It's possible to tell someone to think of clicking a mouse, measure and store the brain patterns, and then program a computer to recognize those patterns as a click. Any inconsistency can be corrected by the user, who should be able to train themselves to recreate the "click" thought.</p><p>Now compare that with the ability to implant an image into someone's mind. Achieving that requires a far deeper understanding of not just the brain, but the particular brain of the subject.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You make a good point .
However , I meant that getting useful input is more difficult than getting useful output .
It 's possible to tell someone to think of clicking a mouse , measure and store the brain patterns , and then program a computer to recognize those patterns as a click .
Any inconsistency can be corrected by the user , who should be able to train themselves to recreate the " click " thought.Now compare that with the ability to implant an image into someone 's mind .
Achieving that requires a far deeper understanding of not just the brain , but the particular brain of the subject .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You make a good point.
However, I meant that getting useful input is more difficult than getting useful output.
It's possible to tell someone to think of clicking a mouse, measure and store the brain patterns, and then program a computer to recognize those patterns as a click.
Any inconsistency can be corrected by the user, who should be able to train themselves to recreate the "click" thought.Now compare that with the ability to implant an image into someone's mind.
Achieving that requires a far deeper understanding of not just the brain, but the particular brain of the subject.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165750</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165762</id>
	<title>Not for me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258633560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Imagine the damage a "keylogger" could do in a system like this.<br>
My mind is the last sanctuary I have left, and I'm not going to jeopardize it by connecting it into a system which can be easily tapped, read, and quite probably manipulated by an outside force.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine the damage a " keylogger " could do in a system like this .
My mind is the last sanctuary I have left , and I 'm not going to jeopardize it by connecting it into a system which can be easily tapped , read , and quite probably manipulated by an outside force .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine the damage a "keylogger" could do in a system like this.
My mind is the last sanctuary I have left, and I'm not going to jeopardize it by connecting it into a system which can be easily tapped, read, and quite probably manipulated by an outside force.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169418</id>
	<title>Re:Don't get too carried away</title>
	<author>ignavus</author>
	<datestamp>1258715580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's about time they're getting to the point of doing something that might be useful.</p></div><p>The phrase you are looking for is: "Hurry up."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's about time they 're getting to the point of doing something that might be useful.The phrase you are looking for is : " Hurry up .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's about time they're getting to the point of doing something that might be useful.The phrase you are looking for is: "Hurry up.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166948</id>
	<title>What's so hard about this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258639920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Come on, it's not brain surgery... oh wait</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on , it 's not brain surgery... oh wait</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on, it's not brain surgery... oh wait</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165600</id>
	<title>Let me know when...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258632900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can get direct neural input from the Playboy channel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can get direct neural input from the Playboy channel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can get direct neural input from the Playboy channel.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167408</id>
	<title>Yes, but...</title>
	<author>gitoffmylawn!</author>
	<datestamp>1258644180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>can it play crysis?</htmltext>
<tokenext>can it play crysis ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>can it play crysis?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166470</id>
	<title>Re:Last Thing I Want</title>
	<author>rockNme2349</author>
	<datestamp>1258636920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well sure you can pay tens of thousands of dollars for a neural implant, but I'd go for the free ad supported one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well sure you can pay tens of thousands of dollars for a neural implant , but I 'd go for the free ad supported one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well sure you can pay tens of thousands of dollars for a neural implant, but I'd go for the free ad supported one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166336</id>
	<title>Re:But Unfortunately...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258636200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>80 \% of  American citizens think the worlds going to end  before then</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>80 \ % of American citizens think the worlds going to end before then</tokentext>
<sentencetext>80 \% of  American citizens think the worlds going to end  before then</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168586</id>
	<title>Mouse+Keyboard, please.</title>
	<author>gknoy</author>
	<datestamp>1258657080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I realize that abstract thought recognition would be great - I think about NASA and get nasa.gov, or something.  However, I'd really be thrilled even to have mental controls mapped a keyboard + mouse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I realize that abstract thought recognition would be great - I think about NASA and get nasa.gov , or something .
However , I 'd really be thrilled even to have mental controls mapped a keyboard + mouse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I realize that abstract thought recognition would be great - I think about NASA and get nasa.gov, or something.
However, I'd really be thrilled even to have mental controls mapped a keyboard + mouse.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30171088</id>
	<title>I wonder what would happen when my mind wanders</title>
	<author>ThinkDifferently</author>
	<datestamp>1258732620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What corner of the web will it go to?  What forms will it auto-fill in for me?  What charges will I find on my credit card at the end of the month?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What corner of the web will it go to ?
What forms will it auto-fill in for me ?
What charges will I find on my credit card at the end of the month ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What corner of the web will it go to?
What forms will it auto-fill in for me?
What charges will I find on my credit card at the end of the month?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165624</id>
	<title>Just wait...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258633020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... a year or two after and we'll have the kind that doesn't require implants. I'll be in that camp.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... a year or two after and we 'll have the kind that does n't require implants .
I 'll be in that camp .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... a year or two after and we'll have the kind that doesn't require implants.
I'll be in that camp.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165942</id>
	<title>Re:Why implants?</title>
	<author>mishehu</author>
	<datestamp>1258634400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suppose somebody has a sick fantasy of being Locutus of Borg.  Resistance is futile.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose somebody has a sick fantasy of being Locutus of Borg .
Resistance is futile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose somebody has a sick fantasy of being Locutus of Borg.
Resistance is futile.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166480</id>
	<title>Re:Risk vs Reward?</title>
	<author>Cal27</author>
	<datestamp>1258636920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>2 + 2 = 4.999999999999925772</htmltext>
<tokenext>2 + 2 = 4.999999999999925772</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2 + 2 = 4.999999999999925772</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168332</id>
	<title>WiFi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258654680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WiFi for me, please.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WiFi for me , please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WiFi for me, please.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165798</id>
	<title>Re:Why implants?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258633740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not to mention some sort of a power source, unless they have ways of running it off of your body's energy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention some sort of a power source , unless they have ways of running it off of your body 's energy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention some sort of a power source, unless they have ways of running it off of your body's energy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165696</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30172530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167784
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30177164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30171324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30170126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30170854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166922
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30170808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30171196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167616
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30170108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_2313216_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30175964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166030
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166310
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169418
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169288
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165750
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169216
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166968
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165626
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165798
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165854
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165942
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166128
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166784
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167784
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168244
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30170108
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30171324
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166216
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165606
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166336
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165782
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166100
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167272
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168956
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167996
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30177164
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30170808
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169162
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167396
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30170854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168038
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167552
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167394
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165646
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30175964
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166242
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30172530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30171196
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166448
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30170126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168482
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165790
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166560
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166920
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166158
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166530
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165772
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166352
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167134
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167252
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30167536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166922
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166550
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30168508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30169094
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30165800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_2313216.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_2313216.30166686
</commentlist>
</conversation>
