<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_19_0526239</id>
	<title>Vulgar Comment On Newspaper Site Costs Man His Job</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1258635420000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://33jones.com/" rel="nofollow">DeeFresh</a> writes <i>"ReadWriteWeb has an article up today discussing an incident in which a <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/leaving\_a\_vulgar\_comment\_online\_might\_cost\_you\_your\_job.php">school employee lost his job after leaving a comment on the website</a> of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch newspaper. After the school employee responded to the newspaper's poll of '<a href="http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/talk-of-the-day/talk-of-the-day/2009/11/whats-the-craziest-thing-youve-ever-eaten-and-did-you-like-it/">the strangest thing you've ever eaten</a>' with a feline-inspired vulgarity, Kurt Greenbaum, the site's director of social media, tracked down the commenter's identity through his IP address and reported him to school officials. When confronted, the <a href="http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/the-editors-desk/the-editors-desk/2009/11/post-a-vulgar-comment-while-youre-at-work-lose-your-job/all-comments/">school employee resigned from his job</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>DeeFresh writes " ReadWriteWeb has an article up today discussing an incident in which a school employee lost his job after leaving a comment on the website of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch newspaper .
After the school employee responded to the newspaper 's poll of 'the strangest thing you 've ever eaten ' with a feline-inspired vulgarity , Kurt Greenbaum , the site 's director of social media , tracked down the commenter 's identity through his IP address and reported him to school officials .
When confronted , the school employee resigned from his job .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DeeFresh writes "ReadWriteWeb has an article up today discussing an incident in which a school employee lost his job after leaving a comment on the website of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch newspaper.
After the school employee responded to the newspaper's poll of 'the strangest thing you've ever eaten' with a feline-inspired vulgarity, Kurt Greenbaum, the site's director of social media, tracked down the commenter's identity through his IP address and reported him to school officials.
When confronted, the school employee resigned from his job.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155566</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258643040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The phrase "on the job" is a vulgarity in my part of the world. If you were working whilst writing that, I think you should resign or be fired.</p><p>OMG 'coming' is a vulgarity too<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... aaaaargh we're all dooomed</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The phrase " on the job " is a vulgarity in my part of the world .
If you were working whilst writing that , I think you should resign or be fired.OMG 'coming ' is a vulgarity too .... aaaaargh we 're all dooomed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The phrase "on the job" is a vulgarity in my part of the world.
If you were working whilst writing that, I think you should resign or be fired.OMG 'coming' is a vulgarity too .... aaaaargh we're all dooomed</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155644</id>
	<title>Re:Would this journalist protect his sources?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258643460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, they're quite clearly still thinking <i>inside the box.</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , they 're quite clearly still thinking inside the box .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, they're quite clearly still thinking inside the box.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155552</id>
	<title>Privacy policy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258642980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok - let's read their privacy policy (which is here: http://www.stltoday.com/help/privacy-policy).</p><p><i><br>"What We Do With the Information We Gather About You<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information. In some cases, however, we may provide information <b>to legal officials</b> as described in &ldquo;Compliance with Legal Process&rdquo; below."<br></i> </p><p>The "school&rsquo;s headmaster" is NOT a "legal official" - this guy may have some grounds for a lawsuit, but I am guessing he'd rather go down quietly...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok - let 's read their privacy policy ( which is here : http : //www.stltoday.com/help/privacy-policy ) .
" What We Do With the Information We Gather About You ...We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information .
In some cases , however , we may provide information to legal officials as described in    Compliance with Legal Process    below .
" The " school    s headmaster " is NOT a " legal official " - this guy may have some grounds for a lawsuit , but I am guessing he 'd rather go down quietly.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok - let's read their privacy policy (which is here: http://www.stltoday.com/help/privacy-policy).
"What We Do With the Information We Gather About You ...We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information.
In some cases, however, we may provide information to legal officials as described in “Compliance with Legal Process” below.
" The "school’s headmaster" is NOT a "legal official" - this guy may have some grounds for a lawsuit, but I am guessing he'd rather go down quietly...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30165956</id>
	<title>Re:Would this journalist protect his sources?</title>
	<author>KingAlanI</author>
	<datestamp>1258634460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a good thing I'm taking these cumments cliterally and not divining any hidden meanings.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a good thing I 'm taking these cumments cliterally and not divining any hidden meanings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a good thing I'm taking these cumments cliterally and not divining any hidden meanings.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30162398</id>
	<title>Re:"We reserve the right"</title>
	<author>deafNewt</author>
	<datestamp>1258622100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting, at least one source is reporting that Greenbaum has been let go:

<a href="http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/282386" title="digitaljournal.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/282386</a> [digitaljournal.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting , at least one source is reporting that Greenbaum has been let go : http : //www.digitaljournal.com/article/282386 [ digitaljournal.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting, at least one source is reporting that Greenbaum has been let go:

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/282386 [digitaljournal.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156374</id>
	<title>Re:Would this journalist protect his sources?</title>
	<author>CopaceticOpus</author>
	<datestamp>1258646460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Soon it will be their jobs which are <i>snatch</i>ed away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Soon it will be their jobs which are snatched away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Soon it will be their jobs which are snatched away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30161936</id>
	<title>GREENBAUM = STAZI</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258663620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Put things in the proper perspective-</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; he did not like the comment<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; he chose to single this one individual out<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; you can bet this was not the only comment he did not agree with now or ever but yet he chose this one</p><p>Kurt Greenbaum is a rat informant that parallels being SS or Stazi or ISI or whatever the fuck they are called in China.</p><p>This is America you fucking clueless feckless dolts!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Put things in the proper perspective-       he did not like the comment       he chose to single this one individual out       you can bet this was not the only comment he did not agree with now or ever but yet he chose this oneKurt Greenbaum is a rat informant that parallels being SS or Stazi or ISI or whatever the fuck they are called in China.This is America you fucking clueless feckless dolts !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Put things in the proper perspective-
      he did not like the comment
      he chose to single this one individual out
      you can bet this was not the only comment he did not agree with now or ever but yet he chose this oneKurt Greenbaum is a rat informant that parallels being SS or Stazi or ISI or whatever the fuck they are called in China.This is America you fucking clueless feckless dolts!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30166844</id>
	<title>Re:Eating a pussy is cool, but eating pussy is not</title>
	<author>Areyoukiddingme</author>
	<datestamp>1258639080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's probably legal to eat your own cat, but I suspect it's illegal to sell butchered cat meat or cooked cat meat.  County health departments are remarkably picky that way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably legal to eat your own cat , but I suspect it 's illegal to sell butchered cat meat or cooked cat meat .
County health departments are remarkably picky that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably legal to eat your own cat, but I suspect it's illegal to sell butchered cat meat or cooked cat meat.
County health departments are remarkably picky that way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157520</id>
	<title>Stupid all around</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1258650000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The whole thing should have been a non-story. The newspaper should have just written it off as another day in the world of reader comments. The principal of the school should have just made a verbal warning. The employee shouldn't have made the comment. Any one of those shoulds could have broken this trifecta of stupid.</p><p>Of course, it's been a long time since schools could actually be expected to show a sense of proportion and it didn't take long once I entered the "adult world" years ago to realize that adults are not nearly as "grown up" as they would have kids believe they are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The whole thing should have been a non-story .
The newspaper should have just written it off as another day in the world of reader comments .
The principal of the school should have just made a verbal warning .
The employee should n't have made the comment .
Any one of those shoulds could have broken this trifecta of stupid.Of course , it 's been a long time since schools could actually be expected to show a sense of proportion and it did n't take long once I entered the " adult world " years ago to realize that adults are not nearly as " grown up " as they would have kids believe they are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The whole thing should have been a non-story.
The newspaper should have just written it off as another day in the world of reader comments.
The principal of the school should have just made a verbal warning.
The employee shouldn't have made the comment.
Any one of those shoulds could have broken this trifecta of stupid.Of course, it's been a long time since schools could actually be expected to show a sense of proportion and it didn't take long once I entered the "adult world" years ago to realize that adults are not nearly as "grown up" as they would have kids believe they are.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154988</id>
	<title>What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258639440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>How bored was this guy?  He worked at a newspaper and decided 'Hey, I don't like that comment, let me track down who it is, where he works, and report him?'  What is this, the second grade?  There are two real options, delete it as being offensive or leave it.  Maybe a third option if it was a threat of some kind, which you could report to authorities.  But really?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How bored was this guy ?
He worked at a newspaper and decided 'Hey , I do n't like that comment , let me track down who it is , where he works , and report him ?
' What is this , the second grade ?
There are two real options , delete it as being offensive or leave it .
Maybe a third option if it was a threat of some kind , which you could report to authorities .
But really ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How bored was this guy?
He worked at a newspaper and decided 'Hey, I don't like that comment, let me track down who it is, where he works, and report him?
'  What is this, the second grade?
There are two real options, delete it as being offensive or leave it.
Maybe a third option if it was a threat of some kind, which you could report to authorities.
But really?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30162484</id>
	<title>everyone needs to chill out</title>
	<author>bluie-</author>
	<datestamp>1258622400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even if this is fake, it seems people take things waaaaaaaayyyyy too seriously these days.  Who gives a damn if some guy makes a sex joke.  I still wouldn't care if my kid went to that school.  Now, if he had said he sampled hobo, and police found dead hobos in his house missing their tender hobo hamstrings, THEN I'd understand if people freaked out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if this is fake , it seems people take things waaaaaaaayyyyy too seriously these days .
Who gives a damn if some guy makes a sex joke .
I still would n't care if my kid went to that school .
Now , if he had said he sampled hobo , and police found dead hobos in his house missing their tender hobo hamstrings , THEN I 'd understand if people freaked out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if this is fake, it seems people take things waaaaaaaayyyyy too seriously these days.
Who gives a damn if some guy makes a sex joke.
I still wouldn't care if my kid went to that school.
Now, if he had said he sampled hobo, and police found dead hobos in his house missing their tender hobo hamstrings, THEN I'd understand if people freaked out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155002</id>
	<title>Pay back</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258639620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some one should track every thing Kurt posts and report back to his boss and wife.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some one should track every thing Kurt posts and report back to his boss and wife .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some one should track every thing Kurt posts and report back to his boss and wife.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30161264</id>
	<title>Re:Would this journalist protect his sources?</title>
	<author>FatAlb3rt</author>
	<datestamp>1258661520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thank you for <i>highlighting the pun</i>.  <br>
We all may have <i>missed it otherwise</i>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you for highlighting the pun .
We all may have missed it otherwise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you for highlighting the pun.
We all may have missed it otherwise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156394</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1258646520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the activity had been detected by the school's IT department-set filters, this is true.</p><p>However, the website editor had no obligation to do the school's work for them, and, in fact, he had no <em>right</em> to do it: the site's privacy policy doesn't say anywhere that recorded-but-hidden information such as IP for a certain post could be disclosed to <em>anyone</em> &ndash; even the entity that owns the IP.</p><p>It's like saying I have a right to go hunting on somebody else's land, as long as I tracked the game off my own property onto theirs. Just because I had a right to it at one point doesn't mean I retain that right when it slips through my fingers. Short of a subpoena, the school had no right to the site's IP logs. IANAL but it seems to me that this teacher has a viable case for a lawsuit against the newspaper, and frankly I hope he does take legal action.</p><p>Let's bring this home, though, and make it personal... do you think Slashdot has the right to inform your employer that you're visiting Slashdot using their corporate assets? Would you appreciate it if they did? Better go check the privacy policy...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the activity had been detected by the school 's IT department-set filters , this is true.However , the website editor had no obligation to do the school 's work for them , and , in fact , he had no right to do it : the site 's privacy policy does n't say anywhere that recorded-but-hidden information such as IP for a certain post could be disclosed to anyone    even the entity that owns the IP.It 's like saying I have a right to go hunting on somebody else 's land , as long as I tracked the game off my own property onto theirs .
Just because I had a right to it at one point does n't mean I retain that right when it slips through my fingers .
Short of a subpoena , the school had no right to the site 's IP logs .
IANAL but it seems to me that this teacher has a viable case for a lawsuit against the newspaper , and frankly I hope he does take legal action.Let 's bring this home , though , and make it personal... do you think Slashdot has the right to inform your employer that you 're visiting Slashdot using their corporate assets ?
Would you appreciate it if they did ?
Better go check the privacy policy.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the activity had been detected by the school's IT department-set filters, this is true.However, the website editor had no obligation to do the school's work for them, and, in fact, he had no right to do it: the site's privacy policy doesn't say anywhere that recorded-but-hidden information such as IP for a certain post could be disclosed to anyone – even the entity that owns the IP.It's like saying I have a right to go hunting on somebody else's land, as long as I tracked the game off my own property onto theirs.
Just because I had a right to it at one point doesn't mean I retain that right when it slips through my fingers.
Short of a subpoena, the school had no right to the site's IP logs.
IANAL but it seems to me that this teacher has a viable case for a lawsuit against the newspaper, and frankly I hope he does take legal action.Let's bring this home, though, and make it personal... do you think Slashdot has the right to inform your employer that you're visiting Slashdot using their corporate assets?
Would you appreciate it if they did?
Better go check the privacy policy...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157818</id>
	<title>Re:Kurt Greenbaum, you are stupid, puritanical scu</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258650780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I feel bad for the site.  Now probably everyone who hears about this is going to be making repeated 'pussy' comments on every single story.  Some deranged madman might even make a Firefox extension to expedite the process.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel bad for the site .
Now probably everyone who hears about this is going to be making repeated 'pussy ' comments on every single story .
Some deranged madman might even make a Firefox extension to expedite the process .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel bad for the site.
Now probably everyone who hears about this is going to be making repeated 'pussy' comments on every single story.
Some deranged madman might even make a Firefox extension to expedite the process.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30188922</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>easyTree</author>
	<datestamp>1258805340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Personally, I was more disturbed by the story of the guy shooting a wildcat from a moving car then carrying its corpse by its tail to a party as a gift which was then barbecued and turned out to have had rabies.</p><p>Curious that Mr. Concerned Citizen didn't see fit to complain to whatever animal protection organisations you might have over there...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally , I was more disturbed by the story of the guy shooting a wildcat from a moving car then carrying its corpse by its tail to a party as a gift which was then barbecued and turned out to have had rabies.Curious that Mr. Concerned Citizen did n't see fit to complain to whatever animal protection organisations you might have over there.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally, I was more disturbed by the story of the guy shooting a wildcat from a moving car then carrying its corpse by its tail to a party as a gift which was then barbecued and turned out to have had rabies.Curious that Mr. Concerned Citizen didn't see fit to complain to whatever animal protection organisations you might have over there...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30167740</id>
	<title>Re:</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1258648200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>You eaten that much, and still haven't eaten the best of all: human flesh!</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>You eaten that much , and still have n't eaten the best of all : human flesh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You eaten that much, and still haven't eaten the best of all: human flesh!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30166788</id>
	<title>With friends like that...</title>
	<author>postermmxvicom</author>
	<datestamp>1258638780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Lesson learned: When making anonymous posts, use either a proxy, an anonymous posting service (COTSE.NET), someone's open WiFi connection, or <b>a friend's computer.</b></p> </div><p>

Some friend *you* are...sheesh.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lesson learned : When making anonymous posts , use either a proxy , an anonymous posting service ( COTSE.NET ) , someone 's open WiFi connection , or a friend 's computer .
Some friend * you * are...sheesh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lesson learned: When making anonymous posts, use either a proxy, an anonymous posting service (COTSE.NET), someone's open WiFi connection, or a friend's computer.
Some friend *you* are...sheesh.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155986</id>
	<title>Re:Kurt Greenbaum, you are stupid, puritanical scu</title>
	<author>Rob the Bold</author>
	<datestamp>1258645020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Kurt Greenbaum is scum, and I will do my best to avoid their website in the future.</p></div><p>You could pretty much guarantee success in that mission by redirecting requests to their domain (stltoday.com) to 127.0.0.1 -- or your own choice -- on every machine you use.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kurt Greenbaum is scum , and I will do my best to avoid their website in the future.You could pretty much guarantee success in that mission by redirecting requests to their domain ( stltoday.com ) to 127.0.0.1 -- or your own choice -- on every machine you use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kurt Greenbaum is scum, and I will do my best to avoid their website in the future.You could pretty much guarantee success in that mission by redirecting requests to their domain (stltoday.com) to 127.0.0.1 -- or your own choice -- on every machine you use.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155456</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1258642500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are like some kind of god damned cartoon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are like some kind of god damned cartoon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are like some kind of god damned cartoon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30164342</id>
	<title>Re:Puritannical?</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1258627920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I consider that a much better solution than, say, blocking an IP address (which might well be shared.)</p></div><p>Well, you'd be wrong. The correct solution is to put a temporary block on the IP (anywhere from 24 hours to a week would seem reasonable), and if someone complains, explain why the IP was blocked.</p><p>If it turns out that it <em>was</em> a shared IP address, you have two alternatives: agree to un-block it on the condition that they do something to prevent the shared IP from being used to post offensive material in the future, or tell them to suck it in and wait until the IP block expires; if they want to track down the guy who did it and do something on their end, that's their prerogative.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I consider that a much better solution than , say , blocking an IP address ( which might well be shared .
) Well , you 'd be wrong .
The correct solution is to put a temporary block on the IP ( anywhere from 24 hours to a week would seem reasonable ) , and if someone complains , explain why the IP was blocked.If it turns out that it was a shared IP address , you have two alternatives : agree to un-block it on the condition that they do something to prevent the shared IP from being used to post offensive material in the future , or tell them to suck it in and wait until the IP block expires ; if they want to track down the guy who did it and do something on their end , that 's their prerogative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I consider that a much better solution than, say, blocking an IP address (which might well be shared.
)Well, you'd be wrong.
The correct solution is to put a temporary block on the IP (anywhere from 24 hours to a week would seem reasonable), and if someone complains, explain why the IP was blocked.If it turns out that it was a shared IP address, you have two alternatives: agree to un-block it on the condition that they do something to prevent the shared IP from being used to post offensive material in the future, or tell them to suck it in and wait until the IP block expires; if they want to track down the guy who did it and do something on their end, that's their prerogative.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157720</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>webdog314</author>
	<datestamp>1258650540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the poll was about late-term abortion, which is as heated an issue as simple obscenities, would you still feel the paper was justified in hunting this guy down and exposing him to his employers?

The guy was an idiot for using a school computer for personal comments, and certainly violating school policy (right or wrong) but the paper was WAY out of line for violating not only their own TOS, but an implied trust of anonymity within their online system. The subject matter simply doesn't matter. The guy at the paper is the one who should have resigned, or been fired.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the poll was about late-term abortion , which is as heated an issue as simple obscenities , would you still feel the paper was justified in hunting this guy down and exposing him to his employers ?
The guy was an idiot for using a school computer for personal comments , and certainly violating school policy ( right or wrong ) but the paper was WAY out of line for violating not only their own TOS , but an implied trust of anonymity within their online system .
The subject matter simply does n't matter .
The guy at the paper is the one who should have resigned , or been fired .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the poll was about late-term abortion, which is as heated an issue as simple obscenities, would you still feel the paper was justified in hunting this guy down and exposing him to his employers?
The guy was an idiot for using a school computer for personal comments, and certainly violating school policy (right or wrong) but the paper was WAY out of line for violating not only their own TOS, but an implied trust of anonymity within their online system.
The subject matter simply doesn't matter.
The guy at the paper is the one who should have resigned, or been fired.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155136</id>
	<title>Employee should sue under EEOC</title>
	<author>NoYob</author>
	<datestamp>1258640460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1. the Quit/Fired employee says that he was eating Chinese food and typing the only word for cat that he could think of at the time was pussy.<br>2. Get a litigator and sue both the school and the St. Louis Dispatch for discrimination. The St. Louis dispatch is obviously discriminating against Asians and people who like to eat Asian food.<br>3. Profit.<br>Great embarrassment among school administrator and paper.</htmltext>
<tokenext>1. the Quit/Fired employee says that he was eating Chinese food and typing the only word for cat that he could think of at the time was pussy.2 .
Get a litigator and sue both the school and the St. Louis Dispatch for discrimination .
The St. Louis dispatch is obviously discriminating against Asians and people who like to eat Asian food.3 .
Profit.Great embarrassment among school administrator and paper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1. the Quit/Fired employee says that he was eating Chinese food and typing the only word for cat that he could think of at the time was pussy.2.
Get a litigator and sue both the school and the St. Louis Dispatch for discrimination.
The St. Louis dispatch is obviously discriminating against Asians and people who like to eat Asian food.3.
Profit.Great embarrassment among school administrator and paper.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155702</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258643820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Now I can't way to see the juvenile posters making this a case of libertarian freedom of speech vs 1984'esque police control and the war on terror."</p><p>That is a petty, juvenile statement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Now I ca n't way to see the juvenile posters making this a case of libertarian freedom of speech vs 1984'esque police control and the war on terror .
" That is a petty , juvenile statement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Now I can't way to see the juvenile posters making this a case of libertarian freedom of speech vs 1984'esque police control and the war on terror.
"That is a petty, juvenile statement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30161216</id>
	<title>privacy policy</title>
	<author>GregNorc</author>
	<datestamp>1258661340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They may not be legally disallowed from calling the poster's employer, but one could make the argument this violates their <a href="http://www.stltoday.com/help/privacy-policy" title="stltoday.com">privacy policy</a> [stltoday.com].</p><p><div class="quote"><p>We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information. In some cases, however, we may provide information to legal officials as described in "Compliance with Legal Process" below.</p><p>In some cases, we contract with third parties to provide services on our behalf, including credit-card and bill processing, shipping, e-mail distribution, list processing and analytics or promotions management. We provide these third parties only with the information necessary for them to perform their specific services. These service providers are restricted from using this information in any way other than to provide services to us, and they may not share this information with any one else nor may they resell this data.</p><p>Compliance with Legal Process<br>We may disclose personal information if we or one of our affiliated companies is required by law to disclose personal information, or if we believe in good faith that such action is necessary to comply with a law or some legal process, to protect or defend our rights and property, to protect against misuse or unauthorized use of our web sites or to protect the personal safety or property of our users or the public.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They may not be legally disallowed from calling the poster 's employer , but one could make the argument this violates their privacy policy [ stltoday.com ] .We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information .
In some cases , however , we may provide information to legal officials as described in " Compliance with Legal Process " below.In some cases , we contract with third parties to provide services on our behalf , including credit-card and bill processing , shipping , e-mail distribution , list processing and analytics or promotions management .
We provide these third parties only with the information necessary for them to perform their specific services .
These service providers are restricted from using this information in any way other than to provide services to us , and they may not share this information with any one else nor may they resell this data.Compliance with Legal ProcessWe may disclose personal information if we or one of our affiliated companies is required by law to disclose personal information , or if we believe in good faith that such action is necessary to comply with a law or some legal process , to protect or defend our rights and property , to protect against misuse or unauthorized use of our web sites or to protect the personal safety or property of our users or the public .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They may not be legally disallowed from calling the poster's employer, but one could make the argument this violates their privacy policy [stltoday.com].We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information.
In some cases, however, we may provide information to legal officials as described in "Compliance with Legal Process" below.In some cases, we contract with third parties to provide services on our behalf, including credit-card and bill processing, shipping, e-mail distribution, list processing and analytics or promotions management.
We provide these third parties only with the information necessary for them to perform their specific services.
These service providers are restricted from using this information in any way other than to provide services to us, and they may not share this information with any one else nor may they resell this data.Compliance with Legal ProcessWe may disclose personal information if we or one of our affiliated companies is required by law to disclose personal information, or if we believe in good faith that such action is necessary to comply with a law or some legal process, to protect or defend our rights and property, to protect against misuse or unauthorized use of our web sites or to protect the personal safety or property of our users or the public.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30168578</id>
	<title>proxy</title>
	<author>jdc18</author>
	<datestamp>1258657020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Use a proxy or vpn next time dude</htmltext>
<tokenext>Use a proxy or vpn next time dude</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use a proxy or vpn next time dude</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30158080</id>
	<title>I see nothing wrong...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258651680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, how many times do you see some assholes posting on a forum and want to strangle them through the computer. I see this as an asshole that got what he deserved. If only more people got fired for this childish comments.</p><p>CAPTCHA: privacy</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , how many times do you see some assholes posting on a forum and want to strangle them through the computer .
I see this as an asshole that got what he deserved .
If only more people got fired for this childish comments.CAPTCHA : privacy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, how many times do you see some assholes posting on a forum and want to strangle them through the computer.
I see this as an asshole that got what he deserved.
If only more people got fired for this childish comments.CAPTCHA: privacy</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30167082</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258640940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now, this could have two variations: if it was an elementary school, it would seem strange.</p></div><p>

You must have gone to some nice elementary school...good for you<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D<br> <br>

Sadly, many of us had quite a vulgar experience at public elementary school.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , this could have two variations : if it was an elementary school , it would seem strange .
You must have gone to some nice elementary school...good for you : D Sadly , many of us had quite a vulgar experience at public elementary school .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, this could have two variations: if it was an elementary school, it would seem strange.
You must have gone to some nice elementary school...good for you :D 

Sadly, many of us had quite a vulgar experience at public elementary school.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30165856</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>elnyka</author>
	<datestamp>1258634040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Nah; I don't need to sully any of that. He resigned (we obviously do not have all of the information, because I honestly doubt that the conversation went "you said pussy twice!" and the guy went "GAH oh noes I quit! D:") because "concerned citizen" noticed that this was coming from a local school IP address. Now, this could have two variations: if it was an elementary school, it would seem strange. If it was either a middle or high school, well, it could have easily been from any student who felt like trolling.</p><p>So, Mr. concerned citizen forwarded a message along the lines of "this e-mail address from your IP address said "pussy" twice on my website". If it had been any student e-mail, that would be the end of it because the teachers just do not have student e-mail addresses on file (usually). If it had been the headmasters e-mail address, Mr. concerned citizen would have been duly ignored.</p><p>And then Mr. concerned citizen writes an article celebrating his ability to turn someone in for saying "pussy" twice. It's slightly difficult (and disturbing) to believe that Mr. concerned citizen had the local school IP address memorized to the point where a brief glance at the e-mail alert tipped him off that this was a serious issue.</p><p>It will be a delight to see if this becomes a normal thing. You know, adults posting on a not-child oriented website and being punished for using naughty words. I'm sure the teacher wasn't on a lunch break, or wasn't waiting for 1200 copies to print, or wasn't waiting for his students to finish a test, etc. Almost as atrocious as someone replying to slashdot on the clock, with their employers computer assets.</p><p>But maybe <b>I just find the idea of being tracked to your job by a hypersensitive journalist a little off putting.</b></p> </div><p>I'd find being tracked to my <b>home computer</b> by a hypersensitive journalist off putting.</p><p>

But to be tracked down to my <b>job PC</b>, I would not find that off putting at all. In fact, that's what any person with at least a pair of functioning neurons should expect, independently of whether the journalist was right or not.</p><p>

Intelligence and a bit of common sense, specially when using one's employer's assets. I mean, c'mon. These aren't partial differential equations. It's really that simple.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Suppose he decides that he should moderate out disagreeable posts? He's well within his rights to do so, as a moderator.</p><p> <b>I just find it ridiculous that the adults have greater difficulty coping with foul language than the kids.</b></p> </div><p>And that, ladies and gentlemen is what differentiates between adults and children.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously, it's a word. Delete it and warn him if you really feel threatened by it; you don't contact the organization it came from.</p></div><p>That is <b>his</b> prerogative and right, and this is what most of the posters here fail to realize. People who say otherwise do so just as a matter of convenience without any valid, logical reason or principle behind their argumentation. </p><p>

So, instead of saying to the journalist not to do something that is his right, you should be saying "dude, don't fool around while using a work's computer, specially if it is in the education sector."</p><p>

Which is a more reasonable and valid proposition.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>How comical it would have been if he had called them instead..."Hello Mr. Rumples, I have a serious issue to address. You see, someone from within your school said pussy....twice. On the internet."</p></div><p>Comical or not, it can happen and it will happen, justifiably or not. So you can either be intelligent or e-tarded. Just as in real life, on the net, Darwin is unforgiving.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nah ; I do n't need to sully any of that .
He resigned ( we obviously do not have all of the information , because I honestly doubt that the conversation went " you said pussy twice !
" and the guy went " GAH oh noes I quit !
D : " ) because " concerned citizen " noticed that this was coming from a local school IP address .
Now , this could have two variations : if it was an elementary school , it would seem strange .
If it was either a middle or high school , well , it could have easily been from any student who felt like trolling.So , Mr. concerned citizen forwarded a message along the lines of " this e-mail address from your IP address said " pussy " twice on my website " .
If it had been any student e-mail , that would be the end of it because the teachers just do not have student e-mail addresses on file ( usually ) .
If it had been the headmasters e-mail address , Mr. concerned citizen would have been duly ignored.And then Mr. concerned citizen writes an article celebrating his ability to turn someone in for saying " pussy " twice .
It 's slightly difficult ( and disturbing ) to believe that Mr. concerned citizen had the local school IP address memorized to the point where a brief glance at the e-mail alert tipped him off that this was a serious issue.It will be a delight to see if this becomes a normal thing .
You know , adults posting on a not-child oriented website and being punished for using naughty words .
I 'm sure the teacher was n't on a lunch break , or was n't waiting for 1200 copies to print , or was n't waiting for his students to finish a test , etc .
Almost as atrocious as someone replying to slashdot on the clock , with their employers computer assets.But maybe I just find the idea of being tracked to your job by a hypersensitive journalist a little off putting .
I 'd find being tracked to my home computer by a hypersensitive journalist off putting .
But to be tracked down to my job PC , I would not find that off putting at all .
In fact , that 's what any person with at least a pair of functioning neurons should expect , independently of whether the journalist was right or not .
Intelligence and a bit of common sense , specially when using one 's employer 's assets .
I mean , c'mon .
These are n't partial differential equations .
It 's really that simple.Suppose he decides that he should moderate out disagreeable posts ?
He 's well within his rights to do so , as a moderator .
I just find it ridiculous that the adults have greater difficulty coping with foul language than the kids .
And that , ladies and gentlemen is what differentiates between adults and children.Seriously , it 's a word .
Delete it and warn him if you really feel threatened by it ; you do n't contact the organization it came from.That is his prerogative and right , and this is what most of the posters here fail to realize .
People who say otherwise do so just as a matter of convenience without any valid , logical reason or principle behind their argumentation .
So , instead of saying to the journalist not to do something that is his right , you should be saying " dude , do n't fool around while using a work 's computer , specially if it is in the education sector .
" Which is a more reasonable and valid proposition.How comical it would have been if he had called them instead... " Hello Mr. Rumples , I have a serious issue to address .
You see , someone from within your school said pussy....twice .
On the internet .
" Comical or not , it can happen and it will happen , justifiably or not .
So you can either be intelligent or e-tarded .
Just as in real life , on the net , Darwin is unforgiving .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nah; I don't need to sully any of that.
He resigned (we obviously do not have all of the information, because I honestly doubt that the conversation went "you said pussy twice!
" and the guy went "GAH oh noes I quit!
D:") because "concerned citizen" noticed that this was coming from a local school IP address.
Now, this could have two variations: if it was an elementary school, it would seem strange.
If it was either a middle or high school, well, it could have easily been from any student who felt like trolling.So, Mr. concerned citizen forwarded a message along the lines of "this e-mail address from your IP address said "pussy" twice on my website".
If it had been any student e-mail, that would be the end of it because the teachers just do not have student e-mail addresses on file (usually).
If it had been the headmasters e-mail address, Mr. concerned citizen would have been duly ignored.And then Mr. concerned citizen writes an article celebrating his ability to turn someone in for saying "pussy" twice.
It's slightly difficult (and disturbing) to believe that Mr. concerned citizen had the local school IP address memorized to the point where a brief glance at the e-mail alert tipped him off that this was a serious issue.It will be a delight to see if this becomes a normal thing.
You know, adults posting on a not-child oriented website and being punished for using naughty words.
I'm sure the teacher wasn't on a lunch break, or wasn't waiting for 1200 copies to print, or wasn't waiting for his students to finish a test, etc.
Almost as atrocious as someone replying to slashdot on the clock, with their employers computer assets.But maybe I just find the idea of being tracked to your job by a hypersensitive journalist a little off putting.
I'd find being tracked to my home computer by a hypersensitive journalist off putting.
But to be tracked down to my job PC, I would not find that off putting at all.
In fact, that's what any person with at least a pair of functioning neurons should expect, independently of whether the journalist was right or not.
Intelligence and a bit of common sense, specially when using one's employer's assets.
I mean, c'mon.
These aren't partial differential equations.
It's really that simple.Suppose he decides that he should moderate out disagreeable posts?
He's well within his rights to do so, as a moderator.
I just find it ridiculous that the adults have greater difficulty coping with foul language than the kids.
And that, ladies and gentlemen is what differentiates between adults and children.Seriously, it's a word.
Delete it and warn him if you really feel threatened by it; you don't contact the organization it came from.That is his prerogative and right, and this is what most of the posters here fail to realize.
People who say otherwise do so just as a matter of convenience without any valid, logical reason or principle behind their argumentation.
So, instead of saying to the journalist not to do something that is his right, you should be saying "dude, don't fool around while using a work's computer, specially if it is in the education sector.
"

Which is a more reasonable and valid proposition.How comical it would have been if he had called them instead..."Hello Mr. Rumples, I have a serious issue to address.
You see, someone from within your school said pussy....twice.
On the internet.
"Comical or not, it can happen and it will happen, justifiably or not.
So you can either be intelligent or e-tarded.
Just as in real life, on the net, Darwin is unforgiving.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155146</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258640640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree. This would've been an injustice if he posted that from home and this happened. But, being on the clock and aggravated by the nature of his employer, he had it coming.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
This would 've been an injustice if he posted that from home and this happened .
But , being on the clock and aggravated by the nature of his employer , he had it coming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
This would've been an injustice if he posted that from home and this happened.
But, being on the clock and aggravated by the nature of his employer, he had it coming.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30161318</id>
	<title>wow</title>
	<author>digitalsushi</author>
	<datestamp>1258661760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this guys makes <a href="http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/talk-of-the-day/talk-of-the-day/2009/11/whats-the-craziest-thing-youve-ever-eaten-and-did-you-like-it/" title="stltoday.com">http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/talk-of-the-day/talk-of-the-day/2009/11/whats-the-craziest-thing-youve-ever-eaten-and-did-you-like-it/</a> [stltoday.com] and gets annoyed at a vandal, calls up the school the IP came from, kurt brags about the outcome here <a href="http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/the-editors-desk/the-editors-desk/2009/11/post-a-vulgar-comment-while-youre-at-work-lose-your-job/" title="stltoday.com">http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/the-editors-desk/the-editors-desk/2009/11/post-a-vulgar-comment-while-youre-at-work-lose-your-job/</a> [stltoday.com]  but backpedals later on here <a href="http://twitter.com/kgreenbaum" title="twitter.com">http://twitter.com/kgreenbaum</a> [twitter.com] and I have to say, the netadmin at the school is just as much a jerk for outing the user.  He had more control than this Kurt guy did.</p><p>And then the headmaster of the school calls kurt up to tell him the guy was fired.  That's sorta private, too.  So it's three dbags trying to out-dbag each other.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this guys makes http : //www.stltoday.com/blogzone/talk-of-the-day/talk-of-the-day/2009/11/whats-the-craziest-thing-youve-ever-eaten-and-did-you-like-it/ [ stltoday.com ] and gets annoyed at a vandal , calls up the school the IP came from , kurt brags about the outcome here http : //www.stltoday.com/blogzone/the-editors-desk/the-editors-desk/2009/11/post-a-vulgar-comment-while-youre-at-work-lose-your-job/ [ stltoday.com ] but backpedals later on here http : //twitter.com/kgreenbaum [ twitter.com ] and I have to say , the netadmin at the school is just as much a jerk for outing the user .
He had more control than this Kurt guy did.And then the headmaster of the school calls kurt up to tell him the guy was fired .
That 's sorta private , too .
So it 's three dbags trying to out-dbag each other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this guys makes http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/talk-of-the-day/talk-of-the-day/2009/11/whats-the-craziest-thing-youve-ever-eaten-and-did-you-like-it/ [stltoday.com] and gets annoyed at a vandal, calls up the school the IP came from, kurt brags about the outcome here http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/the-editors-desk/the-editors-desk/2009/11/post-a-vulgar-comment-while-youre-at-work-lose-your-job/ [stltoday.com]  but backpedals later on here http://twitter.com/kgreenbaum [twitter.com] and I have to say, the netadmin at the school is just as much a jerk for outing the user.
He had more control than this Kurt guy did.And then the headmaster of the school calls kurt up to tell him the guy was fired.
That's sorta private, too.
So it's three dbags trying to out-dbag each other.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30162694</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>celle</author>
	<datestamp>1258623000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If not school, then they would have traced him to his home and still he would have had to quit because he would have been exposed anyway. Fact is the paper misbehaved by violating their own policy. The guy didn't say anything worse than he hears all day long from "those little angels" of the public.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If not school , then they would have traced him to his home and still he would have had to quit because he would have been exposed anyway .
Fact is the paper misbehaved by violating their own policy .
The guy did n't say anything worse than he hears all day long from " those little angels " of the public .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If not school, then they would have traced him to his home and still he would have had to quit because he would have been exposed anyway.
Fact is the paper misbehaved by violating their own policy.
The guy didn't say anything worse than he hears all day long from "those little angels" of the public.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156002</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258645080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suppose I could've modded you overrated,but that wouldn't do much more than fan the flames.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Let's look at this from another perspective.A Meta perspective.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Was the man wrong for typing pussy into a WWW forum?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A. From the standpoint of being an employee, you bet he was wrong.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; B.From a freedom of speech in an open forum that made possible his opinion/joke perspective, no he was alright. Moderation and site administration are the responsibilities of the site owner.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Now the new question, was the paper wrong for tracking the man down merely to take out their anxiety on, when they enabled him and many others to write whatever they like without scripted moderation?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A.If he were actually protecting taxpayers,children,business assets he would be right, but this isn't the case. He did it out of anger on newspaper time to grind his  own ax and make his moderating job easier by denial of freedom of speech to someone that he didn't know posted from a school. Had it been me from my home and a confrontation from him had ensued, he would be getting his nose reset.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; B. This is just outright being a snitch to aquire feelings of self righteous vengeance. Were I the fired man, I would expend my resources to have the snitch investigated for anything useable to make his life hell. Alert the IRS to possible living beyond his means. Complain to the neighborhood association about any infraction. Complain to the police about any unusual noise or parking violations in front of his house.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I don't think you can find any case of society accepting a snitch as a welcome factor to any community. In the micro society of prison they are eliminated immediately. In society we end up having to pay for witness relocation. In schools they are the kid taunted mercilessly till graduation and possibly beaten frequently.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; This amounts to the paper baiting the man who would've posted from his home,were that his location at the time. Truthfully I hope he gets a good lawyer and starts working the snitch and the paper over.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Resignation is often offered to well loved and respected offenders at most jobs for fireable offenses. Since it was a school and a newspaper was involved of course he was offered the choice. DUH.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Should the man have been smarter? yes<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Should the man have been fired? no<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Should the newspaper be exposed by a meta story? Yes, but that won't happen, Newsclowns won't rat on newsclowns anymore than a cop will out a cop.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; This wasn't news this was revenge and I hope the rat gets his.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose I could 've modded you overrated,but that would n't do much more than fan the flames .
      Let 's look at this from another perspective.A Meta perspective .
        Was the man wrong for typing pussy into a WWW forum ?
        A. From the standpoint of being an employee , you bet he was wrong .
          B.From a freedom of speech in an open forum that made possible his opinion/joke perspective , no he was alright .
Moderation and site administration are the responsibilities of the site owner .
          Now the new question , was the paper wrong for tracking the man down merely to take out their anxiety on , when they enabled him and many others to write whatever they like without scripted moderation ?
          A.If he were actually protecting taxpayers,children,business assets he would be right , but this is n't the case .
He did it out of anger on newspaper time to grind his own ax and make his moderating job easier by denial of freedom of speech to someone that he did n't know posted from a school .
Had it been me from my home and a confrontation from him had ensued , he would be getting his nose reset .
          B. This is just outright being a snitch to aquire feelings of self righteous vengeance .
Were I the fired man , I would expend my resources to have the snitch investigated for anything useable to make his life hell .
Alert the IRS to possible living beyond his means .
Complain to the neighborhood association about any infraction .
Complain to the police about any unusual noise or parking violations in front of his house .
        I do n't think you can find any case of society accepting a snitch as a welcome factor to any community .
In the micro society of prison they are eliminated immediately .
In society we end up having to pay for witness relocation .
In schools they are the kid taunted mercilessly till graduation and possibly beaten frequently .
        This amounts to the paper baiting the man who would 've posted from his home,were that his location at the time .
Truthfully I hope he gets a good lawyer and starts working the snitch and the paper over .
          Resignation is often offered to well loved and respected offenders at most jobs for fireable offenses .
Since it was a school and a newspaper was involved of course he was offered the choice .
DUH .       Should the man have been smarter ?
yes       Should the man have been fired ?
no       Should the newspaper be exposed by a meta story ?
Yes , but that wo n't happen , Newsclowns wo n't rat on newsclowns anymore than a cop will out a cop .
        This was n't news this was revenge and I hope the rat gets his .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose I could've modded you overrated,but that wouldn't do much more than fan the flames.
      Let's look at this from another perspective.A Meta perspective.
        Was the man wrong for typing pussy into a WWW forum?
        A. From the standpoint of being an employee, you bet he was wrong.
          B.From a freedom of speech in an open forum that made possible his opinion/joke perspective, no he was alright.
Moderation and site administration are the responsibilities of the site owner.
          Now the new question, was the paper wrong for tracking the man down merely to take out their anxiety on, when they enabled him and many others to write whatever they like without scripted moderation?
          A.If he were actually protecting taxpayers,children,business assets he would be right, but this isn't the case.
He did it out of anger on newspaper time to grind his  own ax and make his moderating job easier by denial of freedom of speech to someone that he didn't know posted from a school.
Had it been me from my home and a confrontation from him had ensued, he would be getting his nose reset.
          B. This is just outright being a snitch to aquire feelings of self righteous vengeance.
Were I the fired man, I would expend my resources to have the snitch investigated for anything useable to make his life hell.
Alert the IRS to possible living beyond his means.
Complain to the neighborhood association about any infraction.
Complain to the police about any unusual noise or parking violations in front of his house.
        I don't think you can find any case of society accepting a snitch as a welcome factor to any community.
In the micro society of prison they are eliminated immediately.
In society we end up having to pay for witness relocation.
In schools they are the kid taunted mercilessly till graduation and possibly beaten frequently.
        This amounts to the paper baiting the man who would've posted from his home,were that his location at the time.
Truthfully I hope he gets a good lawyer and starts working the snitch and the paper over.
          Resignation is often offered to well loved and respected offenders at most jobs for fireable offenses.
Since it was a school and a newspaper was involved of course he was offered the choice.
DUH.
      Should the man have been smarter?
yes
      Should the man have been fired?
no
      Should the newspaper be exposed by a meta story?
Yes, but that won't happen, Newsclowns won't rat on newsclowns anymore than a cop will out a cop.
        This wasn't news this was revenge and I hope the rat gets his.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156624</id>
	<title>It's a newspaper, damn it.</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1258647360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't matter whether he "had it coming" or not.</p><p>Contacting the school violated the stated privacy policy of the site, whether it was a student or staff. We're talking about a newspaper, for god's sake. A newspaper should be the first to stand behind their privacy policy. Reporters have gone to jail to maintain the privacy of their sources, and while the online equivalent of "letters to the editor" isn't quite in the same league as "Deep Throat", this was still unacceptable behavior.</p><p>The St Louis Post-Dispatch needs to step up to the plate and bat for their own goddamn rights. If they DON'T do something about this violation of privacy, they weaken their own ability to protect their sources.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't matter whether he " had it coming " or not.Contacting the school violated the stated privacy policy of the site , whether it was a student or staff .
We 're talking about a newspaper , for god 's sake .
A newspaper should be the first to stand behind their privacy policy .
Reporters have gone to jail to maintain the privacy of their sources , and while the online equivalent of " letters to the editor " is n't quite in the same league as " Deep Throat " , this was still unacceptable behavior.The St Louis Post-Dispatch needs to step up to the plate and bat for their own goddamn rights .
If they DO N'T do something about this violation of privacy , they weaken their own ability to protect their sources .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't matter whether he "had it coming" or not.Contacting the school violated the stated privacy policy of the site, whether it was a student or staff.
We're talking about a newspaper, for god's sake.
A newspaper should be the first to stand behind their privacy policy.
Reporters have gone to jail to maintain the privacy of their sources, and while the online equivalent of "letters to the editor" isn't quite in the same league as "Deep Throat", this was still unacceptable behavior.The St Louis Post-Dispatch needs to step up to the plate and bat for their own goddamn rights.
If they DON'T do something about this violation of privacy, they weaken their own ability to protect their sources.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155236</id>
	<title>So Freaking What!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258641300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm so sick to death on hearing/reading/learning of people who post something on the internet and lose their job over it. Regardless of whether the post was fictional or real, the man was not posting anything about the school he worked for.  He kept the language to not use profanity, and whether someone reads it as 'pussy' or 'cat' doesn't freaking matter.  There is no excuse for our society today for making people lose their jobs because of their personal life.  A job is what the average person works for 8 hours a day usually away from home.</p><p>I don't have to read the comments.  The guy posted with an anonymous name.  I call Shenanigans.</p><p>Conversely, here is my message to the world.  If you're going to post on the web with all the knowledge we have today about how it is used against us, then you subject yourself to scrutiny, right or wrong, you do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm so sick to death on hearing/reading/learning of people who post something on the internet and lose their job over it .
Regardless of whether the post was fictional or real , the man was not posting anything about the school he worked for .
He kept the language to not use profanity , and whether someone reads it as 'pussy ' or 'cat ' does n't freaking matter .
There is no excuse for our society today for making people lose their jobs because of their personal life .
A job is what the average person works for 8 hours a day usually away from home.I do n't have to read the comments .
The guy posted with an anonymous name .
I call Shenanigans.Conversely , here is my message to the world .
If you 're going to post on the web with all the knowledge we have today about how it is used against us , then you subject yourself to scrutiny , right or wrong , you do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm so sick to death on hearing/reading/learning of people who post something on the internet and lose their job over it.
Regardless of whether the post was fictional or real, the man was not posting anything about the school he worked for.
He kept the language to not use profanity, and whether someone reads it as 'pussy' or 'cat' doesn't freaking matter.
There is no excuse for our society today for making people lose their jobs because of their personal life.
A job is what the average person works for 8 hours a day usually away from home.I don't have to read the comments.
The guy posted with an anonymous name.
I call Shenanigans.Conversely, here is my message to the world.
If you're going to post on the web with all the knowledge we have today about how it is used against us, then you subject yourself to scrutiny, right or wrong, you do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155312</id>
	<title>Comment On Newspaper Site Costs Man His Job</title>
	<author>cmcmark76</author>
	<datestamp>1258641720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, now that he is out of a job, perhaps he has need of the following hints on how to get a new job:

<a href="http://www.helium.com/items/1556072-job-loss" title="helium.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.helium.com/items/1556072-job-loss</a> [helium.com]

Another starving writer experiment post!

Thanks!</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , now that he is out of a job , perhaps he has need of the following hints on how to get a new job : http : //www.helium.com/items/1556072-job-loss [ helium.com ] Another starving writer experiment post !
Thanks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, now that he is out of a job, perhaps he has need of the following hints on how to get a new job:

http://www.helium.com/items/1556072-job-loss [helium.com]

Another starving writer experiment post!
Thanks!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30181278</id>
	<title>U are what u eat</title>
	<author>littlepeon</author>
	<datestamp>1258731660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The guy quit after being found out...so the phrase must be true!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The guy quit after being found out...so the phrase must be true !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The guy quit after being found out...so the phrase must be true!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154942</id>
	<title>Pussy. There, I said it.</title>
	<author>GPLDAN</author>
	<datestamp>1258639200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I say everyone on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. should head over the St. Louis Post Dispatch page and post variations on the word. There must be 100 words in the English language for it, so let's get started....</htmltext>
<tokenext>I say everyone on / .
should head over the St. Louis Post Dispatch page and post variations on the word .
There must be 100 words in the English language for it , so let 's get started... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I say everyone on /.
should head over the St. Louis Post Dispatch page and post variations on the word.
There must be 100 words in the English language for it, so let's get started....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155008</id>
	<title>I see a lot of weak people here in the story...</title>
	<author>filesiteguy</author>
	<datestamp>1258639620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow!  I'd say that Greenbaum should be reprimanded for not performing his duties. I wonder where - in the St. Louis Dispatch policies - it states for employees to track down the ip address of those making offensive (but not illegal) posts and then contact the work.<br><br>OTOH, why the heck did the teacher resign at first being contacted? I wonder how much more there is to the story than we're seeing.<br><br>Lesson learned: When making anonymous posts, use either a proxy, an anonymous posting service (COTSE.NET), someone's open WiFi connection, or a friend's computer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow !
I 'd say that Greenbaum should be reprimanded for not performing his duties .
I wonder where - in the St. Louis Dispatch policies - it states for employees to track down the ip address of those making offensive ( but not illegal ) posts and then contact the work.OTOH , why the heck did the teacher resign at first being contacted ?
I wonder how much more there is to the story than we 're seeing.Lesson learned : When making anonymous posts , use either a proxy , an anonymous posting service ( COTSE.NET ) , someone 's open WiFi connection , or a friend 's computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow!
I'd say that Greenbaum should be reprimanded for not performing his duties.
I wonder where - in the St. Louis Dispatch policies - it states for employees to track down the ip address of those making offensive (but not illegal) posts and then contact the work.OTOH, why the heck did the teacher resign at first being contacted?
I wonder how much more there is to the story than we're seeing.Lesson learned: When making anonymous posts, use either a proxy, an anonymous posting service (COTSE.NET), someone's open WiFi connection, or a friend's computer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155390</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>csartanis</author>
	<datestamp>1258642140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pussy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pussy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pussy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30166822</id>
	<title>Re:I see a lot of weak people here in the story...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258638900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Lesson learned: When making anonymous posts, use<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... a friend's computer.</i></p><p>Ummm... uh... oh, nevermind.  Go ahead.  rofl.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lesson learned : When making anonymous posts , use ... a friend 's computer.Ummm... uh... oh , nevermind .
Go ahead .
rofl .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lesson learned: When making anonymous posts, use ... a friend's computer.Ummm... uh... oh, nevermind.
Go ahead.
rofl.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155322</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258641780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Now I can't way to see the juvenile posters making this a case of libertarian freedom of speech vs 1984'esque police control and the war on terror."</p><p>Wouldn't take much effort (well, if the police or DHS had reported this guy to his employer it wouldn't anyhow). Sure, the guy is an idiot. But assuming that he was sitting there spamming reload so he could repost is a bit of a leap - how do you know he didn't make the first post, go back to his paperwork or w/e he was meant to be doing, then check back on the page X minutes later to repost it? Not hugely likely, given that the guy was screwing around on work time anyhow, but surely he would have had better things to do with his time than hammering F5 like a retarded monkey. Both scenarios are just as (un)likely.</p><p>Anyhow, they asked a stupid question, they got a stupid answer. Go figure. You remove it, you see it again. Oh what a fucking tragedy. Block the IP your site like any reasonable individual, or track the guy down and try to get him disciplined/fired? Come on.</p><p>FWIW, I completely disagree with his posts. Those (sadly, too few) pussies that I have been up close and personal with have been quite pretty. Horses for courses, I guess.</p><p>Now I can't way (sic) to see the juvenile conservatives making this a case of "Gays shouldn't be teaching in our children's schools".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Now I ca n't way to see the juvenile posters making this a case of libertarian freedom of speech vs 1984'esque police control and the war on terror .
" Would n't take much effort ( well , if the police or DHS had reported this guy to his employer it would n't anyhow ) .
Sure , the guy is an idiot .
But assuming that he was sitting there spamming reload so he could repost is a bit of a leap - how do you know he did n't make the first post , go back to his paperwork or w/e he was meant to be doing , then check back on the page X minutes later to repost it ?
Not hugely likely , given that the guy was screwing around on work time anyhow , but surely he would have had better things to do with his time than hammering F5 like a retarded monkey .
Both scenarios are just as ( un ) likely.Anyhow , they asked a stupid question , they got a stupid answer .
Go figure .
You remove it , you see it again .
Oh what a fucking tragedy .
Block the IP your site like any reasonable individual , or track the guy down and try to get him disciplined/fired ?
Come on.FWIW , I completely disagree with his posts .
Those ( sadly , too few ) pussies that I have been up close and personal with have been quite pretty .
Horses for courses , I guess.Now I ca n't way ( sic ) to see the juvenile conservatives making this a case of " Gays should n't be teaching in our children 's schools " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Now I can't way to see the juvenile posters making this a case of libertarian freedom of speech vs 1984'esque police control and the war on terror.
"Wouldn't take much effort (well, if the police or DHS had reported this guy to his employer it wouldn't anyhow).
Sure, the guy is an idiot.
But assuming that he was sitting there spamming reload so he could repost is a bit of a leap - how do you know he didn't make the first post, go back to his paperwork or w/e he was meant to be doing, then check back on the page X minutes later to repost it?
Not hugely likely, given that the guy was screwing around on work time anyhow, but surely he would have had better things to do with his time than hammering F5 like a retarded monkey.
Both scenarios are just as (un)likely.Anyhow, they asked a stupid question, they got a stupid answer.
Go figure.
You remove it, you see it again.
Oh what a fucking tragedy.
Block the IP your site like any reasonable individual, or track the guy down and try to get him disciplined/fired?
Come on.FWIW, I completely disagree with his posts.
Those (sadly, too few) pussies that I have been up close and personal with have been quite pretty.
Horses for courses, I guess.Now I can't way (sic) to see the juvenile conservatives making this a case of "Gays shouldn't be teaching in our children's schools".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30166662</id>
	<title>Kurt Greenbaum must not value his own life</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258638060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder what \% of people would kill over something like this. If some piece of shit like this cost me my job over a word I'd probably shoot him in the face.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder what \ % of people would kill over something like this .
If some piece of shit like this cost me my job over a word I 'd probably shoot him in the face .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder what \% of people would kill over something like this.
If some piece of shit like this cost me my job over a word I'd probably shoot him in the face.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30158396</id>
	<title>How lame is the news</title>
	<author>thebian</author>
	<datestamp>1258652640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What a waste of time for a big-league newspaper to bother with strange foods readers have eaten! It's a stupid question, crying out for stupid answers, and then they pay someone to cull through them and classify different kinds of stupidity. The paper doesn't deserve the freedom of the press!</htmltext>
<tokenext>What a waste of time for a big-league newspaper to bother with strange foods readers have eaten !
It 's a stupid question , crying out for stupid answers , and then they pay someone to cull through them and classify different kinds of stupidity .
The paper does n't deserve the freedom of the press !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a waste of time for a big-league newspaper to bother with strange foods readers have eaten!
It's a stupid question, crying out for stupid answers, and then they pay someone to cull through them and classify different kinds of stupidity.
The paper doesn't deserve the freedom of the press!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155400</id>
	<title>pussyy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258642200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>pussy...</p><p>oh wait, I don't have a job</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>pussy...oh wait , I do n't have a job</tokentext>
<sentencetext>pussy...oh wait, I don't have a job</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30159200</id>
	<title>I call bullshit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258655040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe Greenbaum just made this incident up to drive traffic to his blog. Looks like it worked too, didn't it? I find it very difficult to believe that any school isn't using a firewall with NAT or IP Masquerade enabled, and furthermore that any school IT department has the spare time to track down an individual user with a few hours. By Occam's razor, an invented incident is a much simpler and more likely explanation.</p><p>As far as moderation, in the early days of AOL they had "guides" in the chat rooms that could ban any user for violation of the terms of service. One day, knowing a guide was present, I related a long rambling story about how whenever I sat at the computer, my significant other's cat would jump up and try to come between me and the keyboard to get attention, but that was ok because I enjoyed the cat's company and "everybody needs a little pussy now and then". I then turned to the guide and said, "Ok, go ahead and TOS me!". He declined to take any action, stating that the comment was appropriate in the given context! Unfortunately, Greenbaum claims he is not mature enough to make the same judgment...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe Greenbaum just made this incident up to drive traffic to his blog .
Looks like it worked too , did n't it ?
I find it very difficult to believe that any school is n't using a firewall with NAT or IP Masquerade enabled , and furthermore that any school IT department has the spare time to track down an individual user with a few hours .
By Occam 's razor , an invented incident is a much simpler and more likely explanation.As far as moderation , in the early days of AOL they had " guides " in the chat rooms that could ban any user for violation of the terms of service .
One day , knowing a guide was present , I related a long rambling story about how whenever I sat at the computer , my significant other 's cat would jump up and try to come between me and the keyboard to get attention , but that was ok because I enjoyed the cat 's company and " everybody needs a little pussy now and then " .
I then turned to the guide and said , " Ok , go ahead and TOS me ! " .
He declined to take any action , stating that the comment was appropriate in the given context !
Unfortunately , Greenbaum claims he is not mature enough to make the same judgment.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe Greenbaum just made this incident up to drive traffic to his blog.
Looks like it worked too, didn't it?
I find it very difficult to believe that any school isn't using a firewall with NAT or IP Masquerade enabled, and furthermore that any school IT department has the spare time to track down an individual user with a few hours.
By Occam's razor, an invented incident is a much simpler and more likely explanation.As far as moderation, in the early days of AOL they had "guides" in the chat rooms that could ban any user for violation of the terms of service.
One day, knowing a guide was present, I related a long rambling story about how whenever I sat at the computer, my significant other's cat would jump up and try to come between me and the keyboard to get attention, but that was ok because I enjoyed the cat's company and "everybody needs a little pussy now and then".
I then turned to the guide and said, "Ok, go ahead and TOS me!".
He declined to take any action, stating that the comment was appropriate in the given context!
Unfortunately, Greenbaum claims he is not mature enough to make the same judgment...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156974</id>
	<title>Re:Eating a pussy is cool, but eating pussy is not</title>
	<author>harmonise</author>
	<datestamp>1258648500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Still on the site is the story of how some guy killed and ate a cat (is that even legal?), but that is ofc fine, however the guy posting an innuendo obviously went too far!</p></div></blockquote><p>What did you expect? It's the USA. Violence is okay but anything to do with sexuality is not. Yet somehow, even though Americans see sex as a terrible, terrible thing, they still manage to reproduce.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Still on the site is the story of how some guy killed and ate a cat ( is that even legal ?
) , but that is ofc fine , however the guy posting an innuendo obviously went too far ! What did you expect ?
It 's the USA .
Violence is okay but anything to do with sexuality is not .
Yet somehow , even though Americans see sex as a terrible , terrible thing , they still manage to reproduce .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Still on the site is the story of how some guy killed and ate a cat (is that even legal?
), but that is ofc fine, however the guy posting an innuendo obviously went too far!What did you expect?
It's the USA.
Violence is okay but anything to do with sexuality is not.
Yet somehow, even though Americans see sex as a terrible, terrible thing, they still manage to reproduce.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30160634</id>
	<title>Re:I see a lot of weak people here in the story...</title>
	<author>Maestro4k</author>
	<datestamp>1258659360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Only doing it twice a few minutes apart doesn't qualify as a troll yet.  As others have pointed out, the person could have simply though his comment didn't go through (if it didn't show up right away), and tried again, not realizing it had gone into a moderation queue.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only doing it twice a few minutes apart does n't qualify as a troll yet .
As others have pointed out , the person could have simply though his comment did n't go through ( if it did n't show up right away ) , and tried again , not realizing it had gone into a moderation queue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only doing it twice a few minutes apart doesn't qualify as a troll yet.
As others have pointed out, the person could have simply though his comment didn't go through (if it didn't show up right away), and tried again, not realizing it had gone into a moderation queue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30162380</id>
	<title>Before We Complain about Anonymity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258622040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Recall that <i>Common Sense</i> was originally published anonymously.  While it can be a big pain in the butt to deal with, anonymity is not valueless.</p><p>Also, we should get Greenbaum's IP address and scan all of our logs to see if he's ever looked at anything naughty or posted anything non-work-related during working hours.  Good for the goose, good for the gander.  It looks like he violated the paper's privacy policy, as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Recall that Common Sense was originally published anonymously .
While it can be a big pain in the butt to deal with , anonymity is not valueless.Also , we should get Greenbaum 's IP address and scan all of our logs to see if he 's ever looked at anything naughty or posted anything non-work-related during working hours .
Good for the goose , good for the gander .
It looks like he violated the paper 's privacy policy , as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Recall that Common Sense was originally published anonymously.
While it can be a big pain in the butt to deal with, anonymity is not valueless.Also, we should get Greenbaum's IP address and scan all of our logs to see if he's ever looked at anything naughty or posted anything non-work-related during working hours.
Good for the goose, good for the gander.
It looks like he violated the paper's privacy policy, as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155170</id>
	<title>Fago8z</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258640820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">Coomon 4nowledge megs of ram runs</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Coomon 4nowledge megs of ram runs [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Coomon 4nowledge megs of ram runs [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157394</id>
	<title>I am reluctant to comment</title>
	<author>Microsift</author>
	<datestamp>1258649580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The man at the newspaper who tracked the ip address, and identified the poster, should be fired. A newspaper should not be in the business of discouraging free speech. If the comment was offensive, it should have been moderated before publication (assuming there's a published policy against posting offensive material).</p><p>I am just guessing at what the man said, but unless it referenced some criminal act, tracking him down and getting him fired is inexcusable. The newspaper should issue an apology, and give him a job with an equivalent salary and benefits for life.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The man at the newspaper who tracked the ip address , and identified the poster , should be fired .
A newspaper should not be in the business of discouraging free speech .
If the comment was offensive , it should have been moderated before publication ( assuming there 's a published policy against posting offensive material ) .I am just guessing at what the man said , but unless it referenced some criminal act , tracking him down and getting him fired is inexcusable .
The newspaper should issue an apology , and give him a job with an equivalent salary and benefits for life .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>The man at the newspaper who tracked the ip address, and identified the poster, should be fired.
A newspaper should not be in the business of discouraging free speech.
If the comment was offensive, it should have been moderated before publication (assuming there's a published policy against posting offensive material).I am just guessing at what the man said, but unless it referenced some criminal act, tracking him down and getting him fired is inexcusable.
The newspaper should issue an apology, and give him a job with an equivalent salary and benefits for life.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30158084</id>
	<title>join the facebook group</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258651680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=183274233292</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.facebook.com/group.php ? gid = 183274233292</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=183274233292</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155386</id>
	<title>Re:Pay back</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1258642140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That sort of "pay back" would be just as bad as the thing that he did. Better if his employer simply reprimands him for violating the anonymity inherent in the poll he administrated.</p><p>Just because he could did not mean he was justified in doing so. The correct action would have been to delete the offensive content, then either (A) remove the anonymity, so that the anonymous user couldn't continue to post or (B) ban that IP for the rest of the poll (or permanently, it's your decision).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That sort of " pay back " would be just as bad as the thing that he did .
Better if his employer simply reprimands him for violating the anonymity inherent in the poll he administrated.Just because he could did not mean he was justified in doing so .
The correct action would have been to delete the offensive content , then either ( A ) remove the anonymity , so that the anonymous user could n't continue to post or ( B ) ban that IP for the rest of the poll ( or permanently , it 's your decision ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That sort of "pay back" would be just as bad as the thing that he did.
Better if his employer simply reprimands him for violating the anonymity inherent in the poll he administrated.Just because he could did not mean he was justified in doing so.
The correct action would have been to delete the offensive content, then either (A) remove the anonymity, so that the anonymous user couldn't continue to post or (B) ban that IP for the rest of the poll (or permanently, it's your decision).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30189062</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>easyTree</author>
	<datestamp>1258806240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Newsclowns won't rat on newsclowns anymore than <b>they'll report what their own government has been up to on foreign soil for the past few decades</b></p></div></blockquote><p>ftfy</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Newsclowns wo n't rat on newsclowns anymore than they 'll report what their own government has been up to on foreign soil for the past few decadesftfy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Newsclowns won't rat on newsclowns anymore than they'll report what their own government has been up to on foreign soil for the past few decadesftfy
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155466</id>
	<title>Or the school did.</title>
	<author>Alpha Soixante-Neuf</author>
	<datestamp>1258642500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The school&rsquo;s IT director took a shine to the challenge. Long story short: Using the time-frame of the comments, our website location and the IP addresses in the WordPress e-mail, he tracked it back to a specific computer. The headmaster confronted the employee, <b>who resigned on the spot</b>.</p></div><p>Why do people assume the teacher quit because he thought he'd get fired? If I had a boss come to me at the end of the day and say the IT department has spent all day stalking someone who anonymously used the word "p*ssy" as a joke about eating and now it's been discovered that I am the culprit with any kind of incriminating tone I would quit too.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The school    s IT director took a shine to the challenge .
Long story short : Using the time-frame of the comments , our website location and the IP addresses in the WordPress e-mail , he tracked it back to a specific computer .
The headmaster confronted the employee , who resigned on the spot.Why do people assume the teacher quit because he thought he 'd get fired ?
If I had a boss come to me at the end of the day and say the IT department has spent all day stalking someone who anonymously used the word " p * ssy " as a joke about eating and now it 's been discovered that I am the culprit with any kind of incriminating tone I would quit too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The school’s IT director took a shine to the challenge.
Long story short: Using the time-frame of the comments, our website location and the IP addresses in the WordPress e-mail, he tracked it back to a specific computer.
The headmaster confronted the employee, who resigned on the spot.Why do people assume the teacher quit because he thought he'd get fired?
If I had a boss come to me at the end of the day and say the IT department has spent all day stalking someone who anonymously used the word "p*ssy" as a joke about eating and now it's been discovered that I am the culprit with any kind of incriminating tone I would quit too.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155876</id>
	<title>Re:Kurt Greenbaum, you are stupid, puritanical scu</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258644480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, the word was not pussy, it was the C word.</p><p>Also, it's not as if he tracked the person down by the IP. The hostname showed the name of the school, as most schools do, so he called the school because he did not know if it was staff, guest, or a student. The school did the rest and the employee resigned right away when confronted. Doesn't sound forced to me.</p><p>Was it the right thing to do? Probably not, but the least you can do is get the facts straight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the word was not pussy , it was the C word.Also , it 's not as if he tracked the person down by the IP .
The hostname showed the name of the school , as most schools do , so he called the school because he did not know if it was staff , guest , or a student .
The school did the rest and the employee resigned right away when confronted .
Does n't sound forced to me.Was it the right thing to do ?
Probably not , but the least you can do is get the facts straight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the word was not pussy, it was the C word.Also, it's not as if he tracked the person down by the IP.
The hostname showed the name of the school, as most schools do, so he called the school because he did not know if it was staff, guest, or a student.
The school did the rest and the employee resigned right away when confronted.
Doesn't sound forced to me.Was it the right thing to do?
Probably not, but the least you can do is get the facts straight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30236042</id>
	<title>Kurt du Pussy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259242440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yeah, you know, I am not an American, I am European. But of course I heard from this pussy Greenbaum. I think this incredible, where are privacy rights?<br>So lets use our power on internet to show these pussies where it leeds, when they treat people like that!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah , you know , I am not an American , I am European .
But of course I heard from this pussy Greenbaum .
I think this incredible , where are privacy rights ? So lets use our power on internet to show these pussies where it leeds , when they treat people like that !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah, you know, I am not an American, I am European.
But of course I heard from this pussy Greenbaum.
I think this incredible, where are privacy rights?So lets use our power on internet to show these pussies where it leeds, when they treat people like that!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157352</id>
	<title>One commenter is spot-on</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1258649460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/leaving\_a\_vulgar\_comment\_online\_might\_cost\_you\_your\_job.php#comment-169397" title="readwriteweb.com">http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/leaving\_a\_vulgar\_comment\_online\_might\_cost\_you\_your\_job.php#comment-169397</a> [readwriteweb.com]</p><p>The comment on the article above is spot on in their observations.  A line was crossed by Greenbaum and he should be sued and his employer should fire him.</p><p>Read the comment.  He violated the terms of service.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.readwriteweb.com/archives/leaving \ _a \ _vulgar \ _comment \ _online \ _might \ _cost \ _you \ _your \ _job.php # comment-169397 [ readwriteweb.com ] The comment on the article above is spot on in their observations .
A line was crossed by Greenbaum and he should be sued and his employer should fire him.Read the comment .
He violated the terms of service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/leaving\_a\_vulgar\_comment\_online\_might\_cost\_you\_your\_job.php#comment-169397 [readwriteweb.com]The comment on the article above is spot on in their observations.
A line was crossed by Greenbaum and he should be sued and his employer should fire him.Read the comment.
He violated the terms of service.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155554</id>
	<title>Re:I see a lot of weak people here in the story...</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1258642980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Lesson learned: When making anonymous posts, use either a proxy, an anonymous posting service (COTSE.NET), someone's open WiFi connection, or a friend's computer.</p></div><p>Alternate lesson: Find better things to do with your time.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lesson learned : When making anonymous posts , use either a proxy , an anonymous posting service ( COTSE.NET ) , someone 's open WiFi connection , or a friend 's computer.Alternate lesson : Find better things to do with your time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lesson learned: When making anonymous posts, use either a proxy, an anonymous posting service (COTSE.NET), someone's open WiFi connection, or a friend's computer.Alternate lesson: Find better things to do with your time.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30164860</id>
	<title>Re:Pay back</title>
	<author>ponraul</author>
	<datestamp>1258629840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're just asking questions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're just asking questions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're just asking questions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155358</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30159114</id>
	<title>Re:Kurt Greenbaum, you are stupid, puritanical scu</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258654740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to agree with an earlier post:</p><p>"Never write anything anywhere on the Internet, "anonymously" or not, that you would not want your wife, boss, friends, or children to read. Period."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to agree with an earlier post : " Never write anything anywhere on the Internet , " anonymously " or not , that you would not want your wife , boss , friends , or children to read .
Period. "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to agree with an earlier post:"Never write anything anywhere on the Internet, "anonymously" or not, that you would not want your wife, boss, friends, or children to read.
Period."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30161794</id>
	<title>Re:Eating a pussy is cool, but eating pussy is not</title>
	<author>BerryMadness</author>
	<datestamp>1258663140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Like South Park put it <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whale\_Whores" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">
"Fuck you dolphin!! And Fuck you Whale!!"
</a> [wikipedia.org] err... "Fuck you chicken!!  And Fuck you cow!!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Like South Park put it " Fuck you dolphin ! !
And Fuck you Whale ! !
" [ wikipedia.org ] err... " Fuck you chicken ! !
And Fuck you cow ! !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like South Park put it 
"Fuck you dolphin!!
And Fuck you Whale!!
"
 [wikipedia.org] err... "Fuck you chicken!!
And Fuck you cow!!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155508</id>
	<title>Re:Kurt Greenbaum, you are stupid, puritanical scu</title>
	<author>MrNemesis</author>
	<datestamp>1258642740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Guess what? People have sex.</i></p><p>I know for a fact that you won't be having any s*x when I get you fired from your j*b for blasphemy, Mrs. Hiram T. Washbucket from Nashville, Alaska. It's just a shame that saying something that the self-appointed religious/non-religious/power-hungry-maniacs majority don't agree with isn't punishable by death any more, as the world would be such a better place with all the objectively objectionable people removed.</p><p>Whether the guy was crapflooding the site isn't the issue here, folks. Crapflooding is just like being an arsehole - annoying, but not illegal. Ban his IP from posting if he's crapflooding. Reporting using the word "pussy" to his boss in the hope that he gets fired as a result is an plainly obvious vengeance burn. Yeah, the guy was a prick for posting "pussy" all the time, but at least he had a sense (albeit limited) of humour.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guess what ?
People have sex.I know for a fact that you wo n't be having any s * x when I get you fired from your j * b for blasphemy , Mrs. Hiram T. Washbucket from Nashville , Alaska .
It 's just a shame that saying something that the self-appointed religious/non-religious/power-hungry-maniacs majority do n't agree with is n't punishable by death any more , as the world would be such a better place with all the objectively objectionable people removed.Whether the guy was crapflooding the site is n't the issue here , folks .
Crapflooding is just like being an arsehole - annoying , but not illegal .
Ban his IP from posting if he 's crapflooding .
Reporting using the word " pussy " to his boss in the hope that he gets fired as a result is an plainly obvious vengeance burn .
Yeah , the guy was a prick for posting " pussy " all the time , but at least he had a sense ( albeit limited ) of humour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guess what?
People have sex.I know for a fact that you won't be having any s*x when I get you fired from your j*b for blasphemy, Mrs. Hiram T. Washbucket from Nashville, Alaska.
It's just a shame that saying something that the self-appointed religious/non-religious/power-hungry-maniacs majority don't agree with isn't punishable by death any more, as the world would be such a better place with all the objectively objectionable people removed.Whether the guy was crapflooding the site isn't the issue here, folks.
Crapflooding is just like being an arsehole - annoying, but not illegal.
Ban his IP from posting if he's crapflooding.
Reporting using the word "pussy" to his boss in the hope that he gets fired as a result is an plainly obvious vengeance burn.
Yeah, the guy was a prick for posting "pussy" all the time, but at least he had a sense (albeit limited) of humour.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155232</id>
	<title>Would this journalist protect his sources?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258641240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clearly, the standards of journalistic integrity are <i>going down</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly , the standards of journalistic integrity are going down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly, the standards of journalistic integrity are going down.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30165614</id>
	<title>Wordpress to Blame here</title>
	<author>pspahn</author>
	<datestamp>1258632960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I anticipate a series of lawsuits culminating with Wordpress being sued for supplying Greenbaum with the user's IP address.
<br> <br>

Clearly, nobody is to blame here, just the tool. Wordpress is evil and should be eradicated.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I anticipate a series of lawsuits culminating with Wordpress being sued for supplying Greenbaum with the user 's IP address .
Clearly , nobody is to blame here , just the tool .
Wordpress is evil and should be eradicated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I anticipate a series of lawsuits culminating with Wordpress being sued for supplying Greenbaum with the user's IP address.
Clearly, nobody is to blame here, just the tool.
Wordpress is evil and should be eradicated.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30164134</id>
	<title>Re:Kurt Greenbaum, you are stupid, puritanical scu</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1258627260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wonder if 4chan will catch wind of this.</p></div><p>Is it bad that I kinda hope they do?</p><p>This professional asshole needs to meet some professional trolls. He hasn't seen anything yet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if 4chan will catch wind of this.Is it bad that I kinda hope they do ? This professional asshole needs to meet some professional trolls .
He has n't seen anything yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if 4chan will catch wind of this.Is it bad that I kinda hope they do?This professional asshole needs to meet some professional trolls.
He hasn't seen anything yet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156122</id>
	<title>Re:Kurt Greenbaum, you are stupid, puritanical scu</title>
	<author>AlamedaStone</author>
	<datestamp>1258645440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>&gt;"A vulgarity"? You mean the word pussy? OMFG WHAT WOULD JESUS THINK IF HE SAW THAT WORD? Guess what? People have sex.</p></div><p>Not in the US they don't. Decent people have their babies delivered by Fedex. Only European heathens have sex.</p><p>Pervert.</p></div><p>You use FedEx? You latte-drinking, book-reading, Harvard elite liberal. Real Americans use the USPS.</p><p>Pinko.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; " A vulgarity " ?
You mean the word pussy ?
OMFG WHAT WOULD JESUS THINK IF HE SAW THAT WORD ?
Guess what ?
People have sex.Not in the US they do n't .
Decent people have their babies delivered by Fedex .
Only European heathens have sex.Pervert.You use FedEx ?
You latte-drinking , book-reading , Harvard elite liberal .
Real Americans use the USPS.Pinko .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;"A vulgarity"?
You mean the word pussy?
OMFG WHAT WOULD JESUS THINK IF HE SAW THAT WORD?
Guess what?
People have sex.Not in the US they don't.
Decent people have their babies delivered by Fedex.
Only European heathens have sex.Pervert.You use FedEx?
You latte-drinking, book-reading, Harvard elite liberal.
Real Americans use the USPS.Pinko.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30162102</id>
	<title>Re:"We reserve the right"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258664220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Also following excerpts are from their privacy policy:</p><p>Our web servers automatically collect limited information about your computer's connection to the Internet, including your IP address (but not the e-mail address), when you visit our sites. Your IP address does not contain personally identifiable information, nor does it identify you personally.</p><p>We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information <b>or if it makes mention of girl parts because our director of social media, Kurt Greenbaum, was once badly scared when he saw his momma's girl parts and as a result chose to lead an alternative lifestyle shared with other fellas that don't like girl parts</b>. In some cases, however, we may provide information to legal officials as described in &ldquo;Compliance with Legal Process&rdquo; below.</p></div><p>The privacy policy has been amended.  I've bolded the updated portion for convenience.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also following excerpts are from their privacy policy : Our web servers automatically collect limited information about your computer 's connection to the Internet , including your IP address ( but not the e-mail address ) , when you visit our sites .
Your IP address does not contain personally identifiable information , nor does it identify you personally.We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information or if it makes mention of girl parts because our director of social media , Kurt Greenbaum , was once badly scared when he saw his momma 's girl parts and as a result chose to lead an alternative lifestyle shared with other fellas that do n't like girl parts .
In some cases , however , we may provide information to legal officials as described in    Compliance with Legal Process    below.The privacy policy has been amended .
I 've bolded the updated portion for convenience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also following excerpts are from their privacy policy:Our web servers automatically collect limited information about your computer's connection to the Internet, including your IP address (but not the e-mail address), when you visit our sites.
Your IP address does not contain personally identifiable information, nor does it identify you personally.We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information or if it makes mention of girl parts because our director of social media, Kurt Greenbaum, was once badly scared when he saw his momma's girl parts and as a result chose to lead an alternative lifestyle shared with other fellas that don't like girl parts.
In some cases, however, we may provide information to legal officials as described in “Compliance with Legal Process” below.The privacy policy has been amended.
I've bolded the updated portion for convenience.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30167924</id>
	<title>What a pussy.</title>
	<author>bistromath007</author>
	<datestamp>1258650180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He resigned rather than stand up for his right to talk the way he wants when he's not on the job? Real ballsy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He resigned rather than stand up for his right to talk the way he wants when he 's not on the job ?
Real ballsy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He resigned rather than stand up for his right to talk the way he wants when he's not on the job?
Real ballsy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30163884</id>
	<title>Re:Pay back</title>
	<author>nefertitian</author>
	<datestamp>1258626660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, but he refuses to deny that he raped and murdered a young girl in 1990</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but he refuses to deny that he raped and murdered a young girl in 1990</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but he refuses to deny that he raped and murdered a young girl in 1990</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155358</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30189128</id>
	<title>Re:Eating a pussy is cool, but eating pussy is not</title>
	<author>easyTree</author>
	<datestamp>1258806720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you look in a cat's eyes, do you not see more intelligence than when you look into a cow's ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you look in a cat 's eyes , do you not see more intelligence than when you look into a cow 's ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you look in a cat's eyes, do you not see more intelligence than when you look into a cow's ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157214</id>
	<title>Re:So Freaking What!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258649040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh yeah, and "realsilly" is your real name, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yeah , and " realsilly " is your real name , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yeah, and "realsilly" is your real name, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155014</id>
	<title>Srsly?</title>
	<author>smitty777</author>
	<datestamp>1258639620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Come on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. - maybe a stretch to call this news. Aren't there more pressing things going on in the world?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on / .
- maybe a stretch to call this news .
Are n't there more pressing things going on in the world ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on /.
- maybe a stretch to call this news.
Aren't there more pressing things going on in the world?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155434</id>
	<title>Blame not Kurt, but the schools headmaster?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258642320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As far as I understand Kurts blog posting, he didn't threaten the school, but merely informed them of the repeated breaches of the sites policies by one of their IP addresses (which is the usual policy, I guess). It's not clear how the confrontation between the "offender" and the headmaster went - perhaps he was just looking for a reason to quit? Perhaps the headmaster put a lot of pressure on him? I cannot tell from the posting.

But all in all I think Mr. Greenbaum is the least to blame in this constellation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As far as I understand Kurts blog posting , he did n't threaten the school , but merely informed them of the repeated breaches of the sites policies by one of their IP addresses ( which is the usual policy , I guess ) .
It 's not clear how the confrontation between the " offender " and the headmaster went - perhaps he was just looking for a reason to quit ?
Perhaps the headmaster put a lot of pressure on him ?
I can not tell from the posting .
But all in all I think Mr. Greenbaum is the least to blame in this constellation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As far as I understand Kurts blog posting, he didn't threaten the school, but merely informed them of the repeated breaches of the sites policies by one of their IP addresses (which is the usual policy, I guess).
It's not clear how the confrontation between the "offender" and the headmaster went - perhaps he was just looking for a reason to quit?
Perhaps the headmaster put a lot of pressure on him?
I cannot tell from the posting.
But all in all I think Mr. Greenbaum is the least to blame in this constellation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156504</id>
	<title>Re:Would this journalist protect his sources?</title>
	<author>AlamedaStone</author>
	<datestamp>1258646940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I feel bad this guy's cover was <i>blown.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel bad this guy 's cover was blown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel bad this guy's cover was blown.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156846</id>
	<title>other circumstances</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258648020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are likely other circumstances surrounding the employee's resignation.  Certainly, using the employer's computer only for purposes related to the assigned task can be a requirement of employment.  We really don't know what the employee's task assignment may be.  Could the job-task truly be: "Read and respond to stupid editorial questions on a internet blog".  I suppose many slashdot participants would describe their job that way.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are likely other circumstances surrounding the employee 's resignation .
Certainly , using the employer 's computer only for purposes related to the assigned task can be a requirement of employment .
We really do n't know what the employee 's task assignment may be .
Could the job-task truly be : " Read and respond to stupid editorial questions on a internet blog " .
I suppose many slashdot participants would describe their job that way .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are likely other circumstances surrounding the employee's resignation.
Certainly, using the employer's computer only for purposes related to the assigned task can be a requirement of employment.
We really don't know what the employee's task assignment may be.
Could the job-task truly be: "Read and respond to stupid editorial questions on a internet blog".
I suppose many slashdot participants would describe their job that way.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155458</id>
	<title>Re:No place for this kind of crap in America.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258642500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Au contraire.. it's probably one of the few countries where there is a place for this. In Europe, Greenbaum would now face a lawsuit because of privacy violation (I'm sysadmin in Germany, I am well aware that I would probably lose my job if I did what that Greenbaum guy has done).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Au contraire.. it 's probably one of the few countries where there is a place for this .
In Europe , Greenbaum would now face a lawsuit because of privacy violation ( I 'm sysadmin in Germany , I am well aware that I would probably lose my job if I did what that Greenbaum guy has done ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Au contraire.. it's probably one of the few countries where there is a place for this.
In Europe, Greenbaum would now face a lawsuit because of privacy violation (I'm sysadmin in Germany, I am well aware that I would probably lose my job if I did what that Greenbaum guy has done).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30158358</id>
	<title>strange thing to eat</title>
	<author>amoeba1911</author>
	<datestamp>1258652460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Chinese eat cats, maybe he was Chinese and didn't know English well enough to understand that the word pussy (which means kitten) can be misinterpreted as something other than a kitten.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Chinese eat cats , maybe he was Chinese and did n't know English well enough to understand that the word pussy ( which means kitten ) can be misinterpreted as something other than a kitten .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Chinese eat cats, maybe he was Chinese and didn't know English well enough to understand that the word pussy (which means kitten) can be misinterpreted as something other than a kitten.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155698</id>
	<title>Re:Puritannical?</title>
	<author>digitalchinky</author>
	<datestamp>1258643760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess reading comprehension is troublesome for some.</p><p>He wrote Pussy once. Kurt deleted it. Exactly once more he wrote the word Pussy. Then Mr The Kurt decided on revenge.</p><p>Crapflood = a metric fuck ton of the annoying shit, not the word pussy posted exactly twice.</p><p>And given the question, any sane admin would have giggled like a school girl for a couple of milliseconds and then quietly deleted it. A half decent admin would tweak a couple of lines of code in the back end - a half a minute job - to prevent such words from being posted again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess reading comprehension is troublesome for some.He wrote Pussy once .
Kurt deleted it .
Exactly once more he wrote the word Pussy .
Then Mr The Kurt decided on revenge.Crapflood = a metric fuck ton of the annoying shit , not the word pussy posted exactly twice.And given the question , any sane admin would have giggled like a school girl for a couple of milliseconds and then quietly deleted it .
A half decent admin would tweak a couple of lines of code in the back end - a half a minute job - to prevent such words from being posted again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess reading comprehension is troublesome for some.He wrote Pussy once.
Kurt deleted it.
Exactly once more he wrote the word Pussy.
Then Mr The Kurt decided on revenge.Crapflood = a metric fuck ton of the annoying shit, not the word pussy posted exactly twice.And given the question, any sane admin would have giggled like a school girl for a couple of milliseconds and then quietly deleted it.
A half decent admin would tweak a couple of lines of code in the back end - a half a minute job - to prevent such words from being posted again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30159220</id>
	<title>Re:Would this journalist protect his sources?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258655100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, he wasn't thinking in a box, out of a box, with a fox, or in his socks, he wasn't thinking at all, just being a puerile, vindictive "special" little cunt.</p><p>Oops, did I say that out aloud? Shitfuckbugabugabuga. Terribly sorry, what what.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , he was n't thinking in a box , out of a box , with a fox , or in his socks , he was n't thinking at all , just being a puerile , vindictive " special " little cunt.Oops , did I say that out aloud ?
Shitfuckbugabugabuga. Terribly sorry , what what .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, he wasn't thinking in a box, out of a box, with a fox, or in his socks, he wasn't thinking at all, just being a puerile, vindictive "special" little cunt.Oops, did I say that out aloud?
Shitfuckbugabugabuga. Terribly sorry, what what.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30166760</id>
	<title>Re:"We reserve the right"</title>
	<author>GravityStar</author>
	<datestamp>1258638660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The privacy policy is wrong there. An IP address (even without a time-frame) is potential PII, and should thus be treated as PII.</p><p>Part of the problem I have with Kurt Greenbaum's actions is that I would not have been asked to clear out my desk if I did anything similar. My desk would have been cleared out for me.</p><p>Releasing PII is definite no-no.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The privacy policy is wrong there .
An IP address ( even without a time-frame ) is potential PII , and should thus be treated as PII.Part of the problem I have with Kurt Greenbaum 's actions is that I would not have been asked to clear out my desk if I did anything similar .
My desk would have been cleared out for me.Releasing PII is definite no-no .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The privacy policy is wrong there.
An IP address (even without a time-frame) is potential PII, and should thus be treated as PII.Part of the problem I have with Kurt Greenbaum's actions is that I would not have been asked to clear out my desk if I did anything similar.
My desk would have been cleared out for me.Releasing PII is definite no-no.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155124</id>
	<title>"We reserve the right"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258640400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We reserve the right in our sole discretion, but do not assume any obligation, to refuse to post, remove, or edit any messages or postings sent to the Site.</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>We reserve the right to suspend or terminate your access to and use of this Site if, in our view, your conduct fails to meet any of our guidelines. We also reserve the right to change these terms at any time.</p></div><p>Well, fire Greenbaum.  STLtoday.com didn't reserve the right for him to track people down and harass them through their employer, nor did he use the agreed upon remedies outlined in the terms of service.  I guess even the editors don't read those things.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We reserve the right in our sole discretion , but do not assume any obligation , to refuse to post , remove , or edit any messages or postings sent to the Site.We reserve the right to suspend or terminate your access to and use of this Site if , in our view , your conduct fails to meet any of our guidelines .
We also reserve the right to change these terms at any time.Well , fire Greenbaum .
STLtoday.com did n't reserve the right for him to track people down and harass them through their employer , nor did he use the agreed upon remedies outlined in the terms of service .
I guess even the editors do n't read those things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We reserve the right in our sole discretion, but do not assume any obligation, to refuse to post, remove, or edit any messages or postings sent to the Site.We reserve the right to suspend or terminate your access to and use of this Site if, in our view, your conduct fails to meet any of our guidelines.
We also reserve the right to change these terms at any time.Well, fire Greenbaum.
STLtoday.com didn't reserve the right for him to track people down and harass them through their employer, nor did he use the agreed upon remedies outlined in the terms of service.
I guess even the editors don't read those things.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30161138</id>
	<title>The name is Greenbaum?</title>
	<author>Fantastic Lad</author>
	<datestamp>1258661100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The guy's name is Greenbaum and he wants to control what you say and think?</p><p>Well I guess that's appropriate.</p><p>I hate how stuff gets buried on Google.  Type in "Greenbaum Speech" a week from now, and you'll get this idiot's blog and the issue of "Free Speech" coming up instead of <a href="http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/greenbaum.htm" title="cassiopaea.org">this.</a> [cassiopaea.org]</p><p>-FL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The guy 's name is Greenbaum and he wants to control what you say and think ? Well I guess that 's appropriate.I hate how stuff gets buried on Google .
Type in " Greenbaum Speech " a week from now , and you 'll get this idiot 's blog and the issue of " Free Speech " coming up instead of this .
[ cassiopaea.org ] -FL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The guy's name is Greenbaum and he wants to control what you say and think?Well I guess that's appropriate.I hate how stuff gets buried on Google.
Type in "Greenbaum Speech" a week from now, and you'll get this idiot's blog and the issue of "Free Speech" coming up instead of this.
[cassiopaea.org]-FL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30161804</id>
	<title>Re:Pay back</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258663200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Heh, just kidding!</p></div><p>Is that what Kurt Greenbaum said after he raped and murdered that young girl in 1990, allegedly?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Heh , just kidding ! Is that what Kurt Greenbaum said after he raped and murdered that young girl in 1990 , allegedly ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heh, just kidding!Is that what Kurt Greenbaum said after he raped and murdered that young girl in 1990, allegedly?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155358</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30167862</id>
	<title>Email the bastard, just to let him know...</title>
	<author>lamasquerade</author>
	<datestamp>1258649460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They closed the comments or I would have left my favourite word for that particular piece of anatomy, so I thought I'd send an email instead. Sure, it's nothing on the scale of things, but it really exemplifies the decline of our society. Newspapers - once infulential, once worth reading - reduced to this 'social media' bullshit. And a guy involved in this worthless pursuit contributes just a bit more intolerance to a culture full of it. So depressing...</p><p>Anyway, here's the mail:</p><p>Hello,</p><p>I am from Perth, Australia, the other side of the world to you. I am just so disturbed by your actions in tracing some guy and calling his workplace just for using a word that offended you (I assume) that I had to write and tell you that I consider you much lower as a human being than that guy ever could be. In fact, his joke was slightly amusing. But you, with your intolerance of something so slightly off colour, are a real non-entity. It's people like you - not just you, but all of you in the millions - that are dragging down our liberal western societies. Small minded, mean spirited, and easily offended.</p><p>I may have wasted my time sending you this email, but it's less than the amount of time it would have taken you to take out your pathetic vengeance on that poster. Not to mention that you'll be wasting yet more time writing further moronic blog posts - after all it's your job! Actually think of the irony of a guy like you, who basically adds nothing to the world (I mean those ridiculous blogs are available at every newspaper's website in the world, same tired old topics recycled every day) getting a teacher fired. A teacher, someone who actually helps people, who contributes to society. I mean, you're not alone, the vast majority of us basically toil on nothings, it's just a shame that you took out one of the few who actually does do something. Over nothing.</p><p>Well, that's about it. Thanks for making me lose yet further faith in society...</p><p>Jacques.</p><p>p.s. if you want to call my workplace go ahead. I'll make your snooping a little easier: it's an IT consultancy in Australia. Now go!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They closed the comments or I would have left my favourite word for that particular piece of anatomy , so I thought I 'd send an email instead .
Sure , it 's nothing on the scale of things , but it really exemplifies the decline of our society .
Newspapers - once infulential , once worth reading - reduced to this 'social media ' bullshit .
And a guy involved in this worthless pursuit contributes just a bit more intolerance to a culture full of it .
So depressing...Anyway , here 's the mail : Hello,I am from Perth , Australia , the other side of the world to you .
I am just so disturbed by your actions in tracing some guy and calling his workplace just for using a word that offended you ( I assume ) that I had to write and tell you that I consider you much lower as a human being than that guy ever could be .
In fact , his joke was slightly amusing .
But you , with your intolerance of something so slightly off colour , are a real non-entity .
It 's people like you - not just you , but all of you in the millions - that are dragging down our liberal western societies .
Small minded , mean spirited , and easily offended.I may have wasted my time sending you this email , but it 's less than the amount of time it would have taken you to take out your pathetic vengeance on that poster .
Not to mention that you 'll be wasting yet more time writing further moronic blog posts - after all it 's your job !
Actually think of the irony of a guy like you , who basically adds nothing to the world ( I mean those ridiculous blogs are available at every newspaper 's website in the world , same tired old topics recycled every day ) getting a teacher fired .
A teacher , someone who actually helps people , who contributes to society .
I mean , you 're not alone , the vast majority of us basically toil on nothings , it 's just a shame that you took out one of the few who actually does do something .
Over nothing.Well , that 's about it .
Thanks for making me lose yet further faith in society...Jacques.p.s .
if you want to call my workplace go ahead .
I 'll make your snooping a little easier : it 's an IT consultancy in Australia .
Now go !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They closed the comments or I would have left my favourite word for that particular piece of anatomy, so I thought I'd send an email instead.
Sure, it's nothing on the scale of things, but it really exemplifies the decline of our society.
Newspapers - once infulential, once worth reading - reduced to this 'social media' bullshit.
And a guy involved in this worthless pursuit contributes just a bit more intolerance to a culture full of it.
So depressing...Anyway, here's the mail:Hello,I am from Perth, Australia, the other side of the world to you.
I am just so disturbed by your actions in tracing some guy and calling his workplace just for using a word that offended you (I assume) that I had to write and tell you that I consider you much lower as a human being than that guy ever could be.
In fact, his joke was slightly amusing.
But you, with your intolerance of something so slightly off colour, are a real non-entity.
It's people like you - not just you, but all of you in the millions - that are dragging down our liberal western societies.
Small minded, mean spirited, and easily offended.I may have wasted my time sending you this email, but it's less than the amount of time it would have taken you to take out your pathetic vengeance on that poster.
Not to mention that you'll be wasting yet more time writing further moronic blog posts - after all it's your job!
Actually think of the irony of a guy like you, who basically adds nothing to the world (I mean those ridiculous blogs are available at every newspaper's website in the world, same tired old topics recycled every day) getting a teacher fired.
A teacher, someone who actually helps people, who contributes to society.
I mean, you're not alone, the vast majority of us basically toil on nothings, it's just a shame that you took out one of the few who actually does do something.
Over nothing.Well, that's about it.
Thanks for making me lose yet further faith in society...Jacques.p.s.
if you want to call my workplace go ahead.
I'll make your snooping a little easier: it's an IT consultancy in Australia.
Now go!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30159656</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>Absolut187</author>
	<datestamp>1258656540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think anyone has a problem with the guy's boss telling him to resign.<br>I've read all the comments in this case, and maybe 0.1\% of posters are attacking the school's actions.</p><p>But clearly most people have a problem with a journalist intentionally ratting out an anonymous commenter on his newspaper's website.</p><p>The question has never been "is it OK to post naughty words from work" - *obviously* that is "a big no-no" as you put it.</p><p>The *real* question is "When a newspaper solicits comments, does it have a duty to protect anonymity."</p><p>Let's try to focus on the *real* question, shall we?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think anyone has a problem with the guy 's boss telling him to resign.I 've read all the comments in this case , and maybe 0.1 \ % of posters are attacking the school 's actions.But clearly most people have a problem with a journalist intentionally ratting out an anonymous commenter on his newspaper 's website.The question has never been " is it OK to post naughty words from work " - * obviously * that is " a big no-no " as you put it.The * real * question is " When a newspaper solicits comments , does it have a duty to protect anonymity .
" Let 's try to focus on the * real * question , shall we ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think anyone has a problem with the guy's boss telling him to resign.I've read all the comments in this case, and maybe 0.1\% of posters are attacking the school's actions.But clearly most people have a problem with a journalist intentionally ratting out an anonymous commenter on his newspaper's website.The question has never been "is it OK to post naughty words from work" - *obviously* that is "a big no-no" as you put it.The *real* question is "When a newspaper solicits comments, does it have a duty to protect anonymity.
"Let's try to focus on the *real* question, shall we?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155546</id>
	<title>Re:I see a lot of weak people here in the story...</title>
	<author>sardaukar\_siet</author>
	<datestamp>1258642920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Lesson learned: When making anonymous posts, use either a proxy, an anonymous posting service (COTSE.NET), someone's open WiFi connection, or a friend's computer.</p></div><p> Someone's open WiFi connection? Really?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lesson learned : When making anonymous posts , use either a proxy , an anonymous posting service ( COTSE.NET ) , someone 's open WiFi connection , or a friend 's computer .
Someone 's open WiFi connection ?
Really ? : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lesson learned: When making anonymous posts, use either a proxy, an anonymous posting service (COTSE.NET), someone's open WiFi connection, or a friend's computer.
Someone's open WiFi connection?
Really? :D
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30158964</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>kegon</author>
	<datestamp>1258654320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So we have an individual who was using work assets...</p></div></blockquote><p>I challenge you to deny that you have ever checked a web page, email or anything not work related whilst using "work assets". Have you ever made a personal call with your cell phone while at work or looked at the screen to see whose call you missed or what the start of a message says ? Same thing - maybe you have it coming too.</p><blockquote><div><p>he quit on the spot... or so says the story, but that's irrelevant anyways. The guy had it coming.</p></div></blockquote><p>That is totally relevant. I would also quit on the spot any job where my boss goes on a witch hunt for something so minor. Sheesh, talk about trying to see things in perspective. Did he bring the name of the school into disrepute - no, he was posting anonymously, he did not post any identifying information. Did he post any personal information about himself or any member of staff or pupil - no. So his boss was also guilty of blowing it out of proportion.</p><p>Greenbaum is obviously an asshole; just "<i>happened</i> to spot the IP address was that of a local school". Yeah, right. He should get a life.</p><p>By the way. Pussy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So we have an individual who was using work assets...I challenge you to deny that you have ever checked a web page , email or anything not work related whilst using " work assets " .
Have you ever made a personal call with your cell phone while at work or looked at the screen to see whose call you missed or what the start of a message says ?
Same thing - maybe you have it coming too.he quit on the spot... or so says the story , but that 's irrelevant anyways .
The guy had it coming.That is totally relevant .
I would also quit on the spot any job where my boss goes on a witch hunt for something so minor .
Sheesh , talk about trying to see things in perspective .
Did he bring the name of the school into disrepute - no , he was posting anonymously , he did not post any identifying information .
Did he post any personal information about himself or any member of staff or pupil - no .
So his boss was also guilty of blowing it out of proportion.Greenbaum is obviously an asshole ; just " happened to spot the IP address was that of a local school " .
Yeah , right .
He should get a life.By the way .
Pussy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So we have an individual who was using work assets...I challenge you to deny that you have ever checked a web page, email or anything not work related whilst using "work assets".
Have you ever made a personal call with your cell phone while at work or looked at the screen to see whose call you missed or what the start of a message says ?
Same thing - maybe you have it coming too.he quit on the spot... or so says the story, but that's irrelevant anyways.
The guy had it coming.That is totally relevant.
I would also quit on the spot any job where my boss goes on a witch hunt for something so minor.
Sheesh, talk about trying to see things in perspective.
Did he bring the name of the school into disrepute - no, he was posting anonymously, he did not post any identifying information.
Did he post any personal information about himself or any member of staff or pupil - no.
So his boss was also guilty of blowing it out of proportion.Greenbaum is obviously an asshole; just "happened to spot the IP address was that of a local school".
Yeah, right.
He should get a life.By the way.
Pussy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156160</id>
	<title>Tor in browsers</title>
	<author>Danathar</author>
	<datestamp>1258645560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I expect the reaction to this will be the ability to add TOR as a firefox extension (and other browsers will follow with similar efforts).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I expect the reaction to this will be the ability to add TOR as a firefox extension ( and other browsers will follow with similar efforts ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I expect the reaction to this will be the ability to add TOR as a firefox extension (and other browsers will follow with similar efforts).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990</id>
	<title>Kurt Greenbaum, you are stupid, puritanical scum</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1258639500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only that, but he's a fucking hypocrite. He called this guy's employer up with the goal of having him fired, and when cornered over the issue said:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>"Yeah, you caught me! I made him log on to his computer at work, visit STLtoday.com's Talk of the Day, read the item, type a vulgarity and hit the "submit" key.</p><p>Interesting perspective. Thanks for your contribution.</p><p>Oh, I didn't say he was fired. I said he resigned.</p></div><p>"A vulgarity"? You mean the word pussy? OMFG WHAT WOULD JESUS THINK IF HE SAW THAT WORD? Guess what? People have sex.</p><p>P.S. Forced to resign is much the same thing as being fired, especially since in this day and age he could probably have been sued for sexual harassment over such a comment, thus completely ending any future employability.</p><p>Using the word 'pussy' on school time is simply not that bad. Of course, I can't attach these comments to the article itself, because comments are disabled there now even though the story is only three days old. Perhaps that's because most of the comments go something like this:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>YOU are the director of social media? tools to be leveraged to get businesses closer to their customers?</p><p>what an awful story and it's even more embarassing that you squawk about it after the fact.</p></div><p>Kurt Greenbaum is scum, and I will do my best to avoid their website in the future.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only that , but he 's a fucking hypocrite .
He called this guy 's employer up with the goal of having him fired , and when cornered over the issue said : " Yeah , you caught me !
I made him log on to his computer at work , visit STLtoday.com 's Talk of the Day , read the item , type a vulgarity and hit the " submit " key.Interesting perspective .
Thanks for your contribution.Oh , I did n't say he was fired .
I said he resigned .
" A vulgarity " ?
You mean the word pussy ?
OMFG WHAT WOULD JESUS THINK IF HE SAW THAT WORD ?
Guess what ?
People have sex.P.S .
Forced to resign is much the same thing as being fired , especially since in this day and age he could probably have been sued for sexual harassment over such a comment , thus completely ending any future employability.Using the word 'pussy ' on school time is simply not that bad .
Of course , I ca n't attach these comments to the article itself , because comments are disabled there now even though the story is only three days old .
Perhaps that 's because most of the comments go something like this : YOU are the director of social media ?
tools to be leveraged to get businesses closer to their customers ? what an awful story and it 's even more embarassing that you squawk about it after the fact.Kurt Greenbaum is scum , and I will do my best to avoid their website in the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only that, but he's a fucking hypocrite.
He called this guy's employer up with the goal of having him fired, and when cornered over the issue said:"Yeah, you caught me!
I made him log on to his computer at work, visit STLtoday.com's Talk of the Day, read the item, type a vulgarity and hit the "submit" key.Interesting perspective.
Thanks for your contribution.Oh, I didn't say he was fired.
I said he resigned.
"A vulgarity"?
You mean the word pussy?
OMFG WHAT WOULD JESUS THINK IF HE SAW THAT WORD?
Guess what?
People have sex.P.S.
Forced to resign is much the same thing as being fired, especially since in this day and age he could probably have been sued for sexual harassment over such a comment, thus completely ending any future employability.Using the word 'pussy' on school time is simply not that bad.
Of course, I can't attach these comments to the article itself, because comments are disabled there now even though the story is only three days old.
Perhaps that's because most of the comments go something like this:YOU are the director of social media?
tools to be leveraged to get businesses closer to their customers?what an awful story and it's even more embarassing that you squawk about it after the fact.Kurt Greenbaum is scum, and I will do my best to avoid their website in the future.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30159402</id>
	<title>You gonna eat that?</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1258655700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you gonna register that sucker?  'Cause if not I'm gonna fork it off your plate and git 'er done.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you gon na register that sucker ?
'Cause if not I 'm gon na fork it off your plate and git 'er done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you gonna register that sucker?
'Cause if not I'm gonna fork it off your plate and git 'er done.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155358</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155314</id>
	<title>Puritannical?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258641720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA</p><p><div class="quote"><p>In his defense, he probably thought he was simply tattle-telling on a naughty student who would learn a valuable lesson about internet anonymity and would have to sit through a week's detention or something of the like.</p></div><p>From the sound of things, the guy was crapflooding the site. If you're responsible for moderating a forum, and you're being crapflooded from the local<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.edu, then why not call the admin up and complain? Probably just some kid with too much time on his hands.</p><p>And there is nothing to suggest that he particularly cared that the word was. He was an admin, he was being crapflooded, he complained. I consider that a much better solution than, say, blocking an IP address (which might well be shared.)</p><p>
&nbsp; He was in no way responsible for the action that was ultimately taken.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFAIn his defense , he probably thought he was simply tattle-telling on a naughty student who would learn a valuable lesson about internet anonymity and would have to sit through a week 's detention or something of the like.From the sound of things , the guy was crapflooding the site .
If you 're responsible for moderating a forum , and you 're being crapflooded from the local .edu , then why not call the admin up and complain ?
Probably just some kid with too much time on his hands.And there is nothing to suggest that he particularly cared that the word was .
He was an admin , he was being crapflooded , he complained .
I consider that a much better solution than , say , blocking an IP address ( which might well be shared .
)   He was in no way responsible for the action that was ultimately taken .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFAIn his defense, he probably thought he was simply tattle-telling on a naughty student who would learn a valuable lesson about internet anonymity and would have to sit through a week's detention or something of the like.From the sound of things, the guy was crapflooding the site.
If you're responsible for moderating a forum, and you're being crapflooded from the local .edu, then why not call the admin up and complain?
Probably just some kid with too much time on his hands.And there is nothing to suggest that he particularly cared that the word was.
He was an admin, he was being crapflooded, he complained.
I consider that a much better solution than, say, blocking an IP address (which might well be shared.
)
  He was in no way responsible for the action that was ultimately taken.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30160982</id>
	<title>Re:Eating a pussy is cool, but eating pussy is not</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258660500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe "bearded clam"would have been a better choice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe " bearded clam " would have been a better choice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe "bearded clam"would have been a better choice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30182074</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258740120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe he was doing on his lunch break.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe he was doing on his lunch break .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe he was doing on his lunch break.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30158020</id>
	<title>Not On School Time!</title>
	<author>LifesABeach</author>
	<datestamp>1258651440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The dude did it on a government, ( school ), computer; anywhere else, and I think he'd have a solid case for Criminality.  If this "Single" word used relates to a woman's reproductive area, then the School Guy definitely has a case for a Big Grin.  I can only imagine the phone calls, from women, this guy will get.  Most people, newly out of work will be depressed this Holiday Season; School Guy may have to hire an answering service, and a Scheduler for the next few weeks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The dude did it on a government , ( school ) , computer ; anywhere else , and I think he 'd have a solid case for Criminality .
If this " Single " word used relates to a woman 's reproductive area , then the School Guy definitely has a case for a Big Grin .
I can only imagine the phone calls , from women , this guy will get .
Most people , newly out of work will be depressed this Holiday Season ; School Guy may have to hire an answering service , and a Scheduler for the next few weeks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The dude did it on a government, ( school ), computer; anywhere else, and I think he'd have a solid case for Criminality.
If this "Single" word used relates to a woman's reproductive area, then the School Guy definitely has a case for a Big Grin.
I can only imagine the phone calls, from women, this guy will get.
Most people, newly out of work will be depressed this Holiday Season; School Guy may have to hire an answering service, and a Scheduler for the next few weeks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30166588</id>
	<title>Deep thoughts or some serious babbling....</title>
	<author>JonChance</author>
	<datestamp>1258637520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have read through these comments and I agree to several points.  Being forced to resign in this economy is like being shot at dawn for Jay walking. A resignation in the eyes of the unemployment department is basically saying , Yeah I quit that job.  No unemployment for you , they say.   Is the guy an idiot for posting a one word comment repeatedly , yes.  Is Kurt a douche, Yeppers...   Is eating pussy a weird thing to eat, Not in my book and not in the books of many a lesbian. Hell! eating pussy got my nose broken, and yes I am proud of that!   Eating pussy may be a weird thing to eat if you are a guy and your boyfriend disapproves. But to everyone else , great he knows cunning linguistics, to some women the question might be , is he any good at it?

    Should crude and crass speech be protected by the first amendment.  Fuck YES it should.  if you disagree , that is your choice and you miss what living in the United States should be about.   Being politically correct is for those who is afraid of who is listening and what other people think.

If you don't like what I have said, Mod me down.  It only matters if I care.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have read through these comments and I agree to several points .
Being forced to resign in this economy is like being shot at dawn for Jay walking .
A resignation in the eyes of the unemployment department is basically saying , Yeah I quit that job .
No unemployment for you , they say .
Is the guy an idiot for posting a one word comment repeatedly , yes .
Is Kurt a douche , Yeppers... Is eating pussy a weird thing to eat , Not in my book and not in the books of many a lesbian .
Hell ! eating pussy got my nose broken , and yes I am proud of that !
Eating pussy may be a weird thing to eat if you are a guy and your boyfriend disapproves .
But to everyone else , great he knows cunning linguistics , to some women the question might be , is he any good at it ?
Should crude and crass speech be protected by the first amendment .
Fuck YES it should .
if you disagree , that is your choice and you miss what living in the United States should be about .
Being politically correct is for those who is afraid of who is listening and what other people think .
If you do n't like what I have said , Mod me down .
It only matters if I care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have read through these comments and I agree to several points.
Being forced to resign in this economy is like being shot at dawn for Jay walking.
A resignation in the eyes of the unemployment department is basically saying , Yeah I quit that job.
No unemployment for you , they say.
Is the guy an idiot for posting a one word comment repeatedly , yes.
Is Kurt a douche, Yeppers...   Is eating pussy a weird thing to eat, Not in my book and not in the books of many a lesbian.
Hell! eating pussy got my nose broken, and yes I am proud of that!
Eating pussy may be a weird thing to eat if you are a guy and your boyfriend disapproves.
But to everyone else , great he knows cunning linguistics, to some women the question might be , is he any good at it?
Should crude and crass speech be protected by the first amendment.
Fuck YES it should.
if you disagree , that is your choice and you miss what living in the United States should be about.
Being politically correct is for those who is afraid of who is listening and what other people think.
If you don't like what I have said, Mod me down.
It only matters if I care.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30167824</id>
	<title>blah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258649040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>penis</p><p>crap hope i dont lose my job</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>peniscrap hope i dont lose my job</tokentext>
<sentencetext>peniscrap hope i dont lose my job</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155564</id>
	<title>Anonymity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258643040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Should have used Tor</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Should have used Tor</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Should have used Tor</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30159286</id>
	<title>'Why did he email his boss?'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258655280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude didn't know he was ratting on a teacher.  The local highschool was posting obscene comments on his website.  He bends his sites privacy rules a little bit, and sends a notice to the local highschool.  If he recognized (or had flagged) the school IPs addy, than what had probably happened was that this isn't the first time the school had been posting nasty stuff on the newspaper.  Normally it's students messing around in a lab somewhere.  Forward any info you've got to the school, and if they've got a decent tech admin, he can probably figure out what class it was going on in.  Then just give that lab supervisor/teacher a heads up to watch for kids on the local newspaper site, check out what they are doing.  Maybe let them know ahead of time that 'post annonymously' doesn't really work so well, and that your actions on line can have concequences.  Of course, the newspaper dude didn't know that it was actually a teacher doing this.  He probably figured he was just ratting out a few kids.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude did n't know he was ratting on a teacher .
The local highschool was posting obscene comments on his website .
He bends his sites privacy rules a little bit , and sends a notice to the local highschool .
If he recognized ( or had flagged ) the school IPs addy , than what had probably happened was that this is n't the first time the school had been posting nasty stuff on the newspaper .
Normally it 's students messing around in a lab somewhere .
Forward any info you 've got to the school , and if they 've got a decent tech admin , he can probably figure out what class it was going on in .
Then just give that lab supervisor/teacher a heads up to watch for kids on the local newspaper site , check out what they are doing .
Maybe let them know ahead of time that 'post annonymously ' does n't really work so well , and that your actions on line can have concequences .
Of course , the newspaper dude did n't know that it was actually a teacher doing this .
He probably figured he was just ratting out a few kids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude didn't know he was ratting on a teacher.
The local highschool was posting obscene comments on his website.
He bends his sites privacy rules a little bit, and sends a notice to the local highschool.
If he recognized (or had flagged) the school IPs addy, than what had probably happened was that this isn't the first time the school had been posting nasty stuff on the newspaper.
Normally it's students messing around in a lab somewhere.
Forward any info you've got to the school, and if they've got a decent tech admin, he can probably figure out what class it was going on in.
Then just give that lab supervisor/teacher a heads up to watch for kids on the local newspaper site, check out what they are doing.
Maybe let them know ahead of time that 'post annonymously' doesn't really work so well, and that your actions on line can have concequences.
Of course, the newspaper dude didn't know that it was actually a teacher doing this.
He probably figured he was just ratting out a few kids.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155550</id>
	<title>Re:Kurt Greenbaum, you are stupid, puritanical scu</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258642920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>&gt;"A vulgarity"? You mean the word pussy? OMFG WHAT WOULD JESUS THINK IF HE SAW THAT WORD? Guess what? People have sex.</p></div><p>Not in the US they don't. Decent people have their babies delivered by Fedex. Only European heathens have sex.</p><p>Pervert.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; " A vulgarity " ?
You mean the word pussy ?
OMFG WHAT WOULD JESUS THINK IF HE SAW THAT WORD ?
Guess what ?
People have sex.Not in the US they do n't .
Decent people have their babies delivered by Fedex .
Only European heathens have sex.Pervert .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;"A vulgarity"?
You mean the word pussy?
OMFG WHAT WOULD JESUS THINK IF HE SAW THAT WORD?
Guess what?
People have sex.Not in the US they don't.
Decent people have their babies delivered by Fedex.
Only European heathens have sex.Pervert.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155588</id>
	<title>The biggest pussy is Kurt. Look it up.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258643220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The biggest pussy is Kurt. Look it up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The biggest pussy is Kurt .
Look it up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The biggest pussy is Kurt.
Look it up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155072</id>
	<title>Re:Kurt Greenbaum, you are stupid, puritanical scu</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258640100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"A vulgarity"? You mean the word <b>pussy</b>? OMFG WHAT WOULD JESUS THINK IF HE SAW THAT WORD? Guess what? People have sex.</p></div><p>Oh no, this is all just a misunderstanding.  The gentleman simply had cat for dinner.  A Japanese Bobtail to be exact.
</p><p>
Oh, and this is a great reason to give those pushy salesman why I don't subscribe to their yellow Post Dispatch.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" A vulgarity " ?
You mean the word pussy ?
OMFG WHAT WOULD JESUS THINK IF HE SAW THAT WORD ?
Guess what ?
People have sex.Oh no , this is all just a misunderstanding .
The gentleman simply had cat for dinner .
A Japanese Bobtail to be exact .
Oh , and this is a great reason to give those pushy salesman why I do n't subscribe to their yellow Post Dispatch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"A vulgarity"?
You mean the word pussy?
OMFG WHAT WOULD JESUS THINK IF HE SAW THAT WORD?
Guess what?
People have sex.Oh no, this is all just a misunderstanding.
The gentleman simply had cat for dinner.
A Japanese Bobtail to be exact.
Oh, and this is a great reason to give those pushy salesman why I don't subscribe to their yellow Post Dispatch.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157296</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>ei4anb</author>
	<datestamp>1258649280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Meep !</htmltext>
<tokenext>Meep !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meep !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156056</id>
	<title>Re:Kurt Greenbaum, you are stupid, puritanical scu</title>
	<author>AlamedaStone</author>
	<datestamp>1258645260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Excuse my ignorance but, isn't a pussy a small cute hairy mammal?</p></div><p>If you're lucky.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Excuse my ignorance but , is n't a pussy a small cute hairy mammal ? If you 're lucky .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Excuse my ignorance but, isn't a pussy a small cute hairy mammal?If you're lucky.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156304</id>
	<title>My Town!</title>
	<author>zardozo</author>
	<datestamp>1258646100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My town is on slash dot! yay! hooray for the Lou.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My town is on slash dot !
yay ! hooray for the Lou .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My town is on slash dot!
yay! hooray for the Lou.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155268</id>
	<title>Pussy is no more vulgar than teabagger</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258641480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And yet that cunt Kurt Greenbaum has no problem using that in his dross reportage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And yet that cunt Kurt Greenbaum has no problem using that in his dross reportage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And yet that cunt Kurt Greenbaum has no problem using that in his dross reportage.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30162274</id>
	<title>This is a hoax</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258621620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't think of many schools who have their own IP range. They have a single IP, the entire school is behind NAT firewall, and the IP belongs to local cable or telephone company. It is very, very unlikely that reverse DNS would have yielded anything usable at all. The whole story is highly implausible and we all got taken by it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't think of many schools who have their own IP range .
They have a single IP , the entire school is behind NAT firewall , and the IP belongs to local cable or telephone company .
It is very , very unlikely that reverse DNS would have yielded anything usable at all .
The whole story is highly implausible and we all got taken by it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't think of many schools who have their own IP range.
They have a single IP, the entire school is behind NAT firewall, and the IP belongs to local cable or telephone company.
It is very, very unlikely that reverse DNS would have yielded anything usable at all.
The whole story is highly implausible and we all got taken by it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157876</id>
	<title>just ban repeat offenders</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258651020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in the wow forums, repeat offenders are simply banned. that would have been a more civil solution imo.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in the wow forums , repeat offenders are simply banned .
that would have been a more civil solution imo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in the wow forums, repeat offenders are simply banned.
that would have been a more civil solution imo.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155528</id>
	<title>Re:I see a lot of weak people here in the story...</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1258642920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if there was something else in the cache on his school computer....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if there was something else in the cache on his school computer... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if there was something else in the cache on his school computer....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156406</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258646520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>How bored was this guy?</i></p><p>In Sherwood Forest<br>There dwelt a knight<br>Who was known<br>As the annoying Sir Greenbaum</p><p>And many posters<br>Had felt the might<br>Of the smite<br>Of the annoying Sir Greenbaum</p><p>All day with the slaying and slewing<br>And smiting and smoting like Robin Hood<br>Oh, wouldst I could kick the habit<br>And give up smoting for good<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How bored was this guy ? In Sherwood ForestThere dwelt a knightWho was knownAs the annoying Sir GreenbaumAnd many postersHad felt the mightOf the smiteOf the annoying Sir GreenbaumAll day with the slaying and slewingAnd smiting and smoting like Robin HoodOh , wouldst I could kick the habitAnd give up smoting for good ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How bored was this guy?In Sherwood ForestThere dwelt a knightWho was knownAs the annoying Sir GreenbaumAnd many postersHad felt the mightOf the smiteOf the annoying Sir GreenbaumAll day with the slaying and slewingAnd smiting and smoting like Robin HoodOh, wouldst I could kick the habitAnd give up smoting for good ....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30168092</id>
	<title>My Post to Kurt</title>
	<author>justinrchapman</author>
	<datestamp>1258652100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why don&rsquo;t you just disable &ldquo;offensive&rdquo; comments from being posted as many other sites do? I would think that would be the responsible thing to do. Also, since there was not any crime that was committed why would you feel the need to track down the sender of the comment and report it to his ISP which was in this case a school system? I would think that this would be the only allowable reason to attempt to identify your visitors. The poster in question, merely posted the word &ldquo;pussy&rdquo; twice on your poll, that surely you knew would be a target for off-color comments. Surely you knew that saying the word &ldquo;pussy&rdquo; is not illegal and would be protected speach under the 1st amendment, and you would be violating your your own privacy policy by attempting to identify the poster in question. Hypothetically, your poster in question could have been someone that refers to felines as &ldquo;pussy&rdquo; and that would be a strange and uncommon food, but felines are eaten in some cultures. His answer to your poll question  I don&rsquo;t think it could even be considered offensive in the context of your question because the poster could have been referring to eating a cat which would indeed be a strange food to most people. In short, I think that your reaction was unwarranted and could be libel, for you personally and the St. Louis Dispatch. Interesting to see if the &ldquo;victim&rdquo; in this case will seek legal advice for your overreaction and the consequences of your actions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why don    t you just disable    offensive    comments from being posted as many other sites do ?
I would think that would be the responsible thing to do .
Also , since there was not any crime that was committed why would you feel the need to track down the sender of the comment and report it to his ISP which was in this case a school system ?
I would think that this would be the only allowable reason to attempt to identify your visitors .
The poster in question , merely posted the word    pussy    twice on your poll , that surely you knew would be a target for off-color comments .
Surely you knew that saying the word    pussy    is not illegal and would be protected speach under the 1st amendment , and you would be violating your your own privacy policy by attempting to identify the poster in question .
Hypothetically , your poster in question could have been someone that refers to felines as    pussy    and that would be a strange and uncommon food , but felines are eaten in some cultures .
His answer to your poll question I don    t think it could even be considered offensive in the context of your question because the poster could have been referring to eating a cat which would indeed be a strange food to most people .
In short , I think that your reaction was unwarranted and could be libel , for you personally and the St. Louis Dispatch .
Interesting to see if the    victim    in this case will seek legal advice for your overreaction and the consequences of your actions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don’t you just disable “offensive” comments from being posted as many other sites do?
I would think that would be the responsible thing to do.
Also, since there was not any crime that was committed why would you feel the need to track down the sender of the comment and report it to his ISP which was in this case a school system?
I would think that this would be the only allowable reason to attempt to identify your visitors.
The poster in question, merely posted the word “pussy” twice on your poll, that surely you knew would be a target for off-color comments.
Surely you knew that saying the word “pussy” is not illegal and would be protected speach under the 1st amendment, and you would be violating your your own privacy policy by attempting to identify the poster in question.
Hypothetically, your poster in question could have been someone that refers to felines as “pussy” and that would be a strange and uncommon food, but felines are eaten in some cultures.
His answer to your poll question  I don’t think it could even be considered offensive in the context of your question because the poster could have been referring to eating a cat which would indeed be a strange food to most people.
In short, I think that your reaction was unwarranted and could be libel, for you personally and the St. Louis Dispatch.
Interesting to see if the “victim” in this case will seek legal advice for your overreaction and the consequences of your actions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155278</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1258641540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>after all, they give you a paycheck for work, not because you are pretty or something.</p></div></blockquote><p>Teachers are underpaid, and the vast majority take their work home with them, for hours of grading after school.</p><p>Not that I necessarily disagree that he shouldn't have done this, but this more a question of using company property (which is obviously a bad idea) than using company time (which cannot be surmised from his posting on the Internet.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>after all , they give you a paycheck for work , not because you are pretty or something.Teachers are underpaid , and the vast majority take their work home with them , for hours of grading after school.Not that I necessarily disagree that he should n't have done this , but this more a question of using company property ( which is obviously a bad idea ) than using company time ( which can not be surmised from his posting on the Internet .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>after all, they give you a paycheck for work, not because you are pretty or something.Teachers are underpaid, and the vast majority take their work home with them, for hours of grading after school.Not that I necessarily disagree that he shouldn't have done this, but this more a question of using company property (which is obviously a bad idea) than using company time (which cannot be surmised from his posting on the Internet.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155196</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258641000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It was probably part of his job to act as an admin to comments on the site.  Also within that, it would be his job to block IP addresses of repeat offenders (at least temporarily to account for non-static addresses).  In doing so, it's not much of a stretch that he might do some sort of look up on the address, either because he was interested in knowing where it came from or maybe to see if it might be a repeat offender.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was probably part of his job to act as an admin to comments on the site .
Also within that , it would be his job to block IP addresses of repeat offenders ( at least temporarily to account for non-static addresses ) .
In doing so , it 's not much of a stretch that he might do some sort of look up on the address , either because he was interested in knowing where it came from or maybe to see if it might be a repeat offender .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was probably part of his job to act as an admin to comments on the site.
Also within that, it would be his job to block IP addresses of repeat offenders (at least temporarily to account for non-static addresses).
In doing so, it's not much of a stretch that he might do some sort of look up on the address, either because he was interested in knowing where it came from or maybe to see if it might be a repeat offender.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154996</id>
	<title>No place for this kind of crap in America.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258639500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kurt Greenbaum should be ashamed. There is no place whatsoever for that kind of behavior in America.</p><p>Somebody simply wanted to freely express himself, and Kurt interfered. Absolutely pathetic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kurt Greenbaum should be ashamed .
There is no place whatsoever for that kind of behavior in America.Somebody simply wanted to freely express himself , and Kurt interfered .
Absolutely pathetic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kurt Greenbaum should be ashamed.
There is no place whatsoever for that kind of behavior in America.Somebody simply wanted to freely express himself, and Kurt interfered.
Absolutely pathetic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30162572</id>
	<title>Re:"We reserve the right"</title>
	<author>arrogance</author>
	<datestamp>1258622640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This debate should have nothing to do with obscenity or what people do while at work. It's about privacy.

<p>Here's my letter to the GM at the newspaper: please send along your view too. generalmanager@stltoday.com</p><p><div class="quote"><p>"I hope you understand the chill that the actions of your employee have put on people who might post on your site. What is especially noxious is that it was done by someone whose role is to better understand these issues.

</p><p>If it was your intention to stifle comment in what is a new and growing segment of journalism, you have succeeded. The fact that Kurt has stated that he has NOT contravened your paper's policies is astounding, especially as there doesn't seem to be any legal backing for his assertion. Judging by standard logic, common sense, or the apparent spirit of your privacy policy, his actions were against the policy. I would guess that you will find that they were against the best interest of your organization.

</p><p>I made a single post as a comment on your site, with an email address, and am now emailing you from that address. It would be easy to identify me. In the back of my mind, I thought when posting and am thinking now while hitting send: what might they do with MY information, even though I have done nothing wrong?

</p><p>Your organization took clear, active steps that went outside of your own stated policy that is there to protect your clients. Shame."</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This debate should have nothing to do with obscenity or what people do while at work .
It 's about privacy .
Here 's my letter to the GM at the newspaper : please send along your view too .
generalmanager @ stltoday.com " I hope you understand the chill that the actions of your employee have put on people who might post on your site .
What is especially noxious is that it was done by someone whose role is to better understand these issues .
If it was your intention to stifle comment in what is a new and growing segment of journalism , you have succeeded .
The fact that Kurt has stated that he has NOT contravened your paper 's policies is astounding , especially as there does n't seem to be any legal backing for his assertion .
Judging by standard logic , common sense , or the apparent spirit of your privacy policy , his actions were against the policy .
I would guess that you will find that they were against the best interest of your organization .
I made a single post as a comment on your site , with an email address , and am now emailing you from that address .
It would be easy to identify me .
In the back of my mind , I thought when posting and am thinking now while hitting send : what might they do with MY information , even though I have done nothing wrong ?
Your organization took clear , active steps that went outside of your own stated policy that is there to protect your clients .
Shame. "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This debate should have nothing to do with obscenity or what people do while at work.
It's about privacy.
Here's my letter to the GM at the newspaper: please send along your view too.
generalmanager@stltoday.com"I hope you understand the chill that the actions of your employee have put on people who might post on your site.
What is especially noxious is that it was done by someone whose role is to better understand these issues.
If it was your intention to stifle comment in what is a new and growing segment of journalism, you have succeeded.
The fact that Kurt has stated that he has NOT contravened your paper's policies is astounding, especially as there doesn't seem to be any legal backing for his assertion.
Judging by standard logic, common sense, or the apparent spirit of your privacy policy, his actions were against the policy.
I would guess that you will find that they were against the best interest of your organization.
I made a single post as a comment on your site, with an email address, and am now emailing you from that address.
It would be easy to identify me.
In the back of my mind, I thought when posting and am thinking now while hitting send: what might they do with MY information, even though I have done nothing wrong?
Your organization took clear, active steps that went outside of your own stated policy that is there to protect your clients.
Shame."
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155960</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>ChowRiit</author>
	<datestamp>1258644900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think the main point of the outrage is that he lost his job, but rather that the journalist in question violated his website's own privacy rules and then gloated about getting the guy in trouble. I'd simply expect better from a journalist (although, in retrospect, with people like UK tabloid journalists and Fox News I'm not sure why), and I think that violating someone's privacy and then gloating about it is outrageous.</p><p>I do hope they fire this journalist, but I somehow doubt it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think the main point of the outrage is that he lost his job , but rather that the journalist in question violated his website 's own privacy rules and then gloated about getting the guy in trouble .
I 'd simply expect better from a journalist ( although , in retrospect , with people like UK tabloid journalists and Fox News I 'm not sure why ) , and I think that violating someone 's privacy and then gloating about it is outrageous.I do hope they fire this journalist , but I somehow doubt it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think the main point of the outrage is that he lost his job, but rather that the journalist in question violated his website's own privacy rules and then gloated about getting the guy in trouble.
I'd simply expect better from a journalist (although, in retrospect, with people like UK tabloid journalists and Fox News I'm not sure why), and I think that violating someone's privacy and then gloating about it is outrageous.I do hope they fire this journalist, but I somehow doubt it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156740</id>
	<title>Re:I see a lot of weak people here in the story...</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1258647660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Lesson learned: When making anonymous posts, use either a proxy, an anonymous posting service (COTSE.NET), someone's open WiFi connection, or a friend's computer.</i></p><p>He repeatedly reposted the same comment after its being removed, so the lesson is when <b>trolling</b>, use either a proxy, an anonymous posting service , someone's open WiFi connection, or a friend's computer. Actually the lesson is <b>don't be a troll!</b></p><p>What the guy who was forced to resign was doing was, in fact, trolling, by any definition of the word.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lesson learned : When making anonymous posts , use either a proxy , an anonymous posting service ( COTSE.NET ) , someone 's open WiFi connection , or a friend 's computer.He repeatedly reposted the same comment after its being removed , so the lesson is when trolling , use either a proxy , an anonymous posting service , someone 's open WiFi connection , or a friend 's computer .
Actually the lesson is do n't be a troll ! What the guy who was forced to resign was doing was , in fact , trolling , by any definition of the word .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lesson learned: When making anonymous posts, use either a proxy, an anonymous posting service (COTSE.NET), someone's open WiFi connection, or a friend's computer.He repeatedly reposted the same comment after its being removed, so the lesson is when trolling, use either a proxy, an anonymous posting service , someone's open WiFi connection, or a friend's computer.
Actually the lesson is don't be a troll!What the guy who was forced to resign was doing was, in fact, trolling, by any definition of the word.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30158016</id>
	<title>Newspapers</title>
	<author>Archangel Michael</author>
	<datestamp>1258651440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think someone at the Newspaper should be fired for having a whole section dedicated to sporting<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... (see Gen 26:8)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think someone at the Newspaper should be fired for having a whole section dedicated to sporting .... ( see Gen 26 : 8 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think someone at the Newspaper should be fired for having a whole section dedicated to sporting .... (see Gen 26:8)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157970</id>
	<title>Details: RTFA</title>
	<author>MobyDisk</author>
	<datestamp>1258651320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The headline is misleading, and it looks like many of the commenters didn't read the article.  (surprise, surprise)</p><p>1. The editor probably thought they were going after a student abusing school equipment.<br>2. The employee was not fired, he resigned.<br>3. The newspaper didn't actually track the IP address to the individual - they just notified the school.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The headline is misleading , and it looks like many of the commenters did n't read the article .
( surprise , surprise ) 1 .
The editor probably thought they were going after a student abusing school equipment.2 .
The employee was not fired , he resigned.3 .
The newspaper did n't actually track the IP address to the individual - they just notified the school .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The headline is misleading, and it looks like many of the commenters didn't read the article.
(surprise, surprise)1.
The editor probably thought they were going after a student abusing school equipment.2.
The employee was not fired, he resigned.3.
The newspaper didn't actually track the IP address to the individual - they just notified the school.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155430</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>jellomizer</author>
	<datestamp>1258642320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Posting vulgarities really isn't a big no-no but it is considered unprofessional.  Especially that it was an anonymous post.  He was doing it when no kids were watching him do it. If left quite no one would have gotten hurt.  A most he should have a warning/stern talking to.  I am sorry but the children hear much worse with their own communication with each other even back in them good old days before internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Posting vulgarities really is n't a big no-no but it is considered unprofessional .
Especially that it was an anonymous post .
He was doing it when no kids were watching him do it .
If left quite no one would have gotten hurt .
A most he should have a warning/stern talking to .
I am sorry but the children hear much worse with their own communication with each other even back in them good old days before internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Posting vulgarities really isn't a big no-no but it is considered unprofessional.
Especially that it was an anonymous post.
He was doing it when no kids were watching him do it.
If left quite no one would have gotten hurt.
A most he should have a warning/stern talking to.
I am sorry but the children hear much worse with their own communication with each other even back in them good old days before internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30165418</id>
	<title>From their privacy policy...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258632000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Our web servers automatically collect limited information about your computer's connection to the Internet, including your IP address (but not the e-mail address), when you visit our sites. Your IP address does not contain personally identifiable information, nor does it identify you personally."</p><p>"Of course, even if you want to remain completely anonymous, you are still free to take advantage of the wealth of content that is otherwise available, without registration, on our sites."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Our web servers automatically collect limited information about your computer 's connection to the Internet , including your IP address ( but not the e-mail address ) , when you visit our sites .
Your IP address does not contain personally identifiable information , nor does it identify you personally .
" " Of course , even if you want to remain completely anonymous , you are still free to take advantage of the wealth of content that is otherwise available , without registration , on our sites .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Our web servers automatically collect limited information about your computer's connection to the Internet, including your IP address (but not the e-mail address), when you visit our sites.
Your IP address does not contain personally identifiable information, nor does it identify you personally.
""Of course, even if you want to remain completely anonymous, you are still free to take advantage of the wealth of content that is otherwise available, without registration, on our sites.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155468</id>
	<title>Re:Kurt Greenbaum, you are stupid, puritanical scu</title>
	<author>xtracto</author>
	<datestamp>1258642500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Excuse my ignorance but, isn't a pussy a small cute hairy mammal?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Excuse my ignorance but , is n't a pussy a small cute hairy mammal ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Excuse my ignorance but, isn't a pussy a small cute hairy mammal?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30164764</id>
	<title>time for a call!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258629480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>14393 Rainy Lake Drive<br>Chesterfield, MO 63017<br>US<br>+1.3148780398</p><p>Verified.  Called and spoke to his wife.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>14393 Rainy Lake DriveChesterfield , MO 63017US + 1.3148780398Verified .
Called and spoke to his wife .
: ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>14393 Rainy Lake DriveChesterfield, MO 63017US+1.3148780398Verified.
Called and spoke to his wife.
:]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156948</id>
	<title>The entire thing is a hoax.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258648380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's all made up out of thin air by that one guy.</p><p>Meep.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's all made up out of thin air by that one guy.Meep .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's all made up out of thin air by that one guy.Meep.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157980</id>
	<title>Re:"We reserve the right"</title>
	<author>Josh Coalson</author>
	<datestamp>1258651320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>it could just be a hoax.  from the comments:<p><div class="quote"><p>Just a month ago Greenbaum wrote an article and tweeted about hoaxes in the media. What motivates people to do them, etc.<br>
<br>
Now, it sounds like all the details come straight from Greenbaum.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>
<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/leaving\_a\_vulgar\_comment\_online\_might\_cost\_you\_your\_job.php#comment-169438" title="readwriteweb.com">http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/leaving\_a\_vulgar\_comment\_online\_might\_cost\_you\_your\_job.php#comment-169438</a> [readwriteweb.com]
<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/leaving\_a\_vulgar\_comment\_online\_might\_cost\_you\_your\_job.php#comment-169602" title="readwriteweb.com">http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/leaving\_a\_vulgar\_comment\_online\_might\_cost\_you\_your\_job.php#comment-169602</a> [readwriteweb.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>it could just be a hoax .
from the comments : Just a month ago Greenbaum wrote an article and tweeted about hoaxes in the media .
What motivates people to do them , etc .
Now , it sounds like all the details come straight from Greenbaum .
.. . http : //www.readwriteweb.com/archives/leaving \ _a \ _vulgar \ _comment \ _online \ _might \ _cost \ _you \ _your \ _job.php # comment-169438 [ readwriteweb.com ] http : //www.readwriteweb.com/archives/leaving \ _a \ _vulgar \ _comment \ _online \ _might \ _cost \ _you \ _your \ _job.php # comment-169602 [ readwriteweb.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it could just be a hoax.
from the comments:Just a month ago Greenbaum wrote an article and tweeted about hoaxes in the media.
What motivates people to do them, etc.
Now, it sounds like all the details come straight from Greenbaum.
...
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/leaving\_a\_vulgar\_comment\_online\_might\_cost\_you\_your\_job.php#comment-169438 [readwriteweb.com]
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/leaving\_a\_vulgar\_comment\_online\_might\_cost\_you\_your\_job.php#comment-169602 [readwriteweb.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157484</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>dbIII</author>
	<datestamp>1258649940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The school was in the right in asking the guy "what are you doing, ON THE CLOCK, with OUR COMPUTER ASSETS</p></div></blockquote><p>That argument was barely relevant in 1990 and is entirely pointless now that the facebook generation are busy blogging about their love lives at work under their real names for some insane reason.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The school was in the right in asking the guy " what are you doing , ON THE CLOCK , with OUR COMPUTER ASSETSThat argument was barely relevant in 1990 and is entirely pointless now that the facebook generation are busy blogging about their love lives at work under their real names for some insane reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The school was in the right in asking the guy "what are you doing, ON THE CLOCK, with OUR COMPUTER ASSETSThat argument was barely relevant in 1990 and is entirely pointless now that the facebook generation are busy blogging about their love lives at work under their real names for some insane reason.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</id>
	<title>He got it coming</title>
	<author>elnyka</author>
	<datestamp>1258639980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not that I agree with the guy losing his job, but he should have known better. Posting vulgarities while on the job and/or using work-related assets (computer, e-mail, internet connectivity), and/or when representing the company, that's a big no no. This is specially true if you work in an educational institute.<p>

Now consider the following (bold text by me):</p><p>

<a href="http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/the-editors-desk/the-editors-desk/2009/11/post-a-vulgar-comment-while-youre-at-work-lose-your-job/all-comments/" title="stltoday.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/the-editors-desk/the-editors-desk/2009/11/post-a-vulgar-comment-while-youre-at-work-lose-your-job/all-comments/</a> [stltoday.com] </p><p><div class="quote"><p>By mid-morning, a number of folks had commented about their experiences with Bird&rsquo;s Nest Soup, octopus, cow brains and rattlesnake. Then, while I was in our 10 a.m. news meeting, someone posted in reply a single word, a vulgar expression for a part of a woman&rsquo;s anatomy. <b>It was there only a minute before a colleague deleted it</b>.</p><p>

<b>A few minutes later, the same guy posted the same single-word comment again</b>. I deleted it, but noticed in the WordPress e-mail alert that his comment had come from an <b>IP address at a local school</b>. So I called the school. They were happy to have me forward the e-mail, though I wasn&rsquo;t sure what they&rsquo;d be able to do with the meager information it included.

About six hours later, I heard from the school&rsquo;s headmaster. The school&rsquo;s IT director took a shine to the challenge. Long story short: Using the time-frame of the comments, our website location and the IP addresses in the WordPress e-mail, he tracked it back to a specific computer. The headmaster confronted the employee, <b>who resigned on the spot</b>.</p></div><p>So we have an individual who was using work assets to make not one, but two vulgar posts. It kinda makes you wonder how intent was this guy in checking that web page over and over (like many slashdoters do), re-posting the vulgarity as many times as needed... not the type of activity you are supposed to be doing while on the clock (<b>after all, they give you a paycheck for work, not because you are pretty or something.</b>)</p><p>


The school was in the right in asking the guy "what are you doing, ON THE CLOCK, with OUR COMPUTER ASSETS, posting the same profanity several times?</p><p>

It is also worth noting that the school didn't fire him, but that he quit on the spot... or so says the story, but that's irrelevant anyways. The guy had it coming.</p><p>

Now I can't way to see the juvenile posters making this a case of libertarian freedom of speech vs 1984'esque police control and the war on terror.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not that I agree with the guy losing his job , but he should have known better .
Posting vulgarities while on the job and/or using work-related assets ( computer , e-mail , internet connectivity ) , and/or when representing the company , that 's a big no no .
This is specially true if you work in an educational institute .
Now consider the following ( bold text by me ) : http : //www.stltoday.com/blogzone/the-editors-desk/the-editors-desk/2009/11/post-a-vulgar-comment-while-youre-at-work-lose-your-job/all-comments/ [ stltoday.com ] By mid-morning , a number of folks had commented about their experiences with Bird    s Nest Soup , octopus , cow brains and rattlesnake .
Then , while I was in our 10 a.m. news meeting , someone posted in reply a single word , a vulgar expression for a part of a woman    s anatomy .
It was there only a minute before a colleague deleted it .
A few minutes later , the same guy posted the same single-word comment again .
I deleted it , but noticed in the WordPress e-mail alert that his comment had come from an IP address at a local school .
So I called the school .
They were happy to have me forward the e-mail , though I wasn    t sure what they    d be able to do with the meager information it included .
About six hours later , I heard from the school    s headmaster .
The school    s IT director took a shine to the challenge .
Long story short : Using the time-frame of the comments , our website location and the IP addresses in the WordPress e-mail , he tracked it back to a specific computer .
The headmaster confronted the employee , who resigned on the spot.So we have an individual who was using work assets to make not one , but two vulgar posts .
It kinda makes you wonder how intent was this guy in checking that web page over and over ( like many slashdoters do ) , re-posting the vulgarity as many times as needed... not the type of activity you are supposed to be doing while on the clock ( after all , they give you a paycheck for work , not because you are pretty or something .
) The school was in the right in asking the guy " what are you doing , ON THE CLOCK , with OUR COMPUTER ASSETS , posting the same profanity several times ?
It is also worth noting that the school did n't fire him , but that he quit on the spot... or so says the story , but that 's irrelevant anyways .
The guy had it coming .
Now I ca n't way to see the juvenile posters making this a case of libertarian freedom of speech vs 1984'esque police control and the war on terror .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not that I agree with the guy losing his job, but he should have known better.
Posting vulgarities while on the job and/or using work-related assets (computer, e-mail, internet connectivity), and/or when representing the company, that's a big no no.
This is specially true if you work in an educational institute.
Now consider the following (bold text by me):

http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/the-editors-desk/the-editors-desk/2009/11/post-a-vulgar-comment-while-youre-at-work-lose-your-job/all-comments/ [stltoday.com] By mid-morning, a number of folks had commented about their experiences with Bird’s Nest Soup, octopus, cow brains and rattlesnake.
Then, while I was in our 10 a.m. news meeting, someone posted in reply a single word, a vulgar expression for a part of a woman’s anatomy.
It was there only a minute before a colleague deleted it.
A few minutes later, the same guy posted the same single-word comment again.
I deleted it, but noticed in the WordPress e-mail alert that his comment had come from an IP address at a local school.
So I called the school.
They were happy to have me forward the e-mail, though I wasn’t sure what they’d be able to do with the meager information it included.
About six hours later, I heard from the school’s headmaster.
The school’s IT director took a shine to the challenge.
Long story short: Using the time-frame of the comments, our website location and the IP addresses in the WordPress e-mail, he tracked it back to a specific computer.
The headmaster confronted the employee, who resigned on the spot.So we have an individual who was using work assets to make not one, but two vulgar posts.
It kinda makes you wonder how intent was this guy in checking that web page over and over (like many slashdoters do), re-posting the vulgarity as many times as needed... not the type of activity you are supposed to be doing while on the clock (after all, they give you a paycheck for work, not because you are pretty or something.
)


The school was in the right in asking the guy "what are you doing, ON THE CLOCK, with OUR COMPUTER ASSETS, posting the same profanity several times?
It is also worth noting that the school didn't fire him, but that he quit on the spot... or so says the story, but that's irrelevant anyways.
The guy had it coming.
Now I can't way to see the juvenile posters making this a case of libertarian freedom of speech vs 1984'esque police control and the war on terror.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155134</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258640460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the word pussy is a vulgarity? lol "ew sex, no I cant go near that, its vulgar!" what is this guy 5?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the word pussy is a vulgarity ?
lol " ew sex , no I cant go near that , its vulgar !
" what is this guy 5 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the word pussy is a vulgarity?
lol "ew sex, no I cant go near that, its vulgar!
" what is this guy 5?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155700</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>prefec2</author>
	<datestamp>1258643760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously he has a boring job. And no real news he can report on. Or to be more precise he does not want to report on important information (who cares if the world falls apart). He needed something with more juice. And - as everyone knows - sex sells. And reporting on other peoples likes is even more "interesting".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously he has a boring job .
And no real news he can report on .
Or to be more precise he does not want to report on important information ( who cares if the world falls apart ) .
He needed something with more juice .
And - as everyone knows - sex sells .
And reporting on other peoples likes is even more " interesting " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously he has a boring job.
And no real news he can report on.
Or to be more precise he does not want to report on important information (who cares if the world falls apart).
He needed something with more juice.
And - as everyone knows - sex sells.
And reporting on other peoples likes is even more "interesting".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155200</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>ZekoMal</author>
	<datestamp>1258641060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nah; I don't need to sully any of that. He resigned (we obviously do not have all of the information, because I honestly doubt that the conversation went "you said pussy twice!" and the guy went "GAH oh noes I quit! D:") because "concerned citizen" noticed that this was coming from a local school IP address. Now, this could have two variations: if it was an elementary school, it would seem strange. If it was either a middle or high school, well, it could have easily been from any student who felt like trolling.</p><p>So, Mr. concerned citizen forwarded a message along the lines of "this e-mail address from your IP address said "pussy" twice on my website". If it had been any student e-mail, that would be the end of it because the teachers just do not have student e-mail addresses on file (usually). If it had been the headmasters e-mail address, Mr. concerned citizen would have been duly ignored.</p><p>And then Mr. concerned citizen writes an article celebrating his ability to turn someone in for saying "pussy" twice. It's slightly difficult (and disturbing) to believe that Mr. concerned citizen had the local school IP address memorized to the point where a brief glance at the e-mail alert tipped him off that this was a serious issue.</p><p>It will be a delight to see if this becomes a normal thing. You know, adults posting on a not-child oriented website and being punished for using naughty words. I'm sure the teacher wasn't on a lunch break, or wasn't waiting for 1200 copies to print, or wasn't waiting for his students to finish a test, etc. Almost as atrocious as someone replying to slashdot on the clock, with their employers computer assets.</p><p>But maybe I just find the idea of being tracked to your job by a hypersensitive journalist a little off putting. Suppose he decides that he should moderate out disagreeable posts? He's well within his rights to do so, as a moderator.</p><p>I just find it ridiculous that the adults have greater difficulty coping with foul language than the kids. Seriously, it's a word. Delete it and warn him if you really feel threatened by it; you don't contact the organization it came from. How comical it would have been if he had called them instead..."Hello Mr. Rumples, I have a serious issue to address. You see, someone from within your school said pussy....twice. On the internet."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nah ; I do n't need to sully any of that .
He resigned ( we obviously do not have all of the information , because I honestly doubt that the conversation went " you said pussy twice !
" and the guy went " GAH oh noes I quit !
D : " ) because " concerned citizen " noticed that this was coming from a local school IP address .
Now , this could have two variations : if it was an elementary school , it would seem strange .
If it was either a middle or high school , well , it could have easily been from any student who felt like trolling.So , Mr. concerned citizen forwarded a message along the lines of " this e-mail address from your IP address said " pussy " twice on my website " .
If it had been any student e-mail , that would be the end of it because the teachers just do not have student e-mail addresses on file ( usually ) .
If it had been the headmasters e-mail address , Mr. concerned citizen would have been duly ignored.And then Mr. concerned citizen writes an article celebrating his ability to turn someone in for saying " pussy " twice .
It 's slightly difficult ( and disturbing ) to believe that Mr. concerned citizen had the local school IP address memorized to the point where a brief glance at the e-mail alert tipped him off that this was a serious issue.It will be a delight to see if this becomes a normal thing .
You know , adults posting on a not-child oriented website and being punished for using naughty words .
I 'm sure the teacher was n't on a lunch break , or was n't waiting for 1200 copies to print , or was n't waiting for his students to finish a test , etc .
Almost as atrocious as someone replying to slashdot on the clock , with their employers computer assets.But maybe I just find the idea of being tracked to your job by a hypersensitive journalist a little off putting .
Suppose he decides that he should moderate out disagreeable posts ?
He 's well within his rights to do so , as a moderator.I just find it ridiculous that the adults have greater difficulty coping with foul language than the kids .
Seriously , it 's a word .
Delete it and warn him if you really feel threatened by it ; you do n't contact the organization it came from .
How comical it would have been if he had called them instead... " Hello Mr. Rumples , I have a serious issue to address .
You see , someone from within your school said pussy....twice .
On the internet .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nah; I don't need to sully any of that.
He resigned (we obviously do not have all of the information, because I honestly doubt that the conversation went "you said pussy twice!
" and the guy went "GAH oh noes I quit!
D:") because "concerned citizen" noticed that this was coming from a local school IP address.
Now, this could have two variations: if it was an elementary school, it would seem strange.
If it was either a middle or high school, well, it could have easily been from any student who felt like trolling.So, Mr. concerned citizen forwarded a message along the lines of "this e-mail address from your IP address said "pussy" twice on my website".
If it had been any student e-mail, that would be the end of it because the teachers just do not have student e-mail addresses on file (usually).
If it had been the headmasters e-mail address, Mr. concerned citizen would have been duly ignored.And then Mr. concerned citizen writes an article celebrating his ability to turn someone in for saying "pussy" twice.
It's slightly difficult (and disturbing) to believe that Mr. concerned citizen had the local school IP address memorized to the point where a brief glance at the e-mail alert tipped him off that this was a serious issue.It will be a delight to see if this becomes a normal thing.
You know, adults posting on a not-child oriented website and being punished for using naughty words.
I'm sure the teacher wasn't on a lunch break, or wasn't waiting for 1200 copies to print, or wasn't waiting for his students to finish a test, etc.
Almost as atrocious as someone replying to slashdot on the clock, with their employers computer assets.But maybe I just find the idea of being tracked to your job by a hypersensitive journalist a little off putting.
Suppose he decides that he should moderate out disagreeable posts?
He's well within his rights to do so, as a moderator.I just find it ridiculous that the adults have greater difficulty coping with foul language than the kids.
Seriously, it's a word.
Delete it and warn him if you really feel threatened by it; you don't contact the organization it came from.
How comical it would have been if he had called them instead..."Hello Mr. Rumples, I have a serious issue to address.
You see, someone from within your school said pussy....twice.
On the internet.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155556</id>
	<title>Re:"We reserve the right"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258642980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also following excerpts are from their privacy policy:</p><p>Our web servers automatically collect limited information about your computer's connection to the Internet, including your IP address (but not the e-mail address), when you visit our sites. Your IP address does not contain personally identifiable information, nor does it identify you personally.</p><p>We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information. In some cases, however, we may provide information to legal officials as described in &ldquo;Compliance with Legal Process&rdquo; below.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also following excerpts are from their privacy policy : Our web servers automatically collect limited information about your computer 's connection to the Internet , including your IP address ( but not the e-mail address ) , when you visit our sites .
Your IP address does not contain personally identifiable information , nor does it identify you personally.We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information .
In some cases , however , we may provide information to legal officials as described in    Compliance with Legal Process    below .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also following excerpts are from their privacy policy:Our web servers automatically collect limited information about your computer's connection to the Internet, including your IP address (but not the e-mail address), when you visit our sites.
Your IP address does not contain personally identifiable information, nor does it identify you personally.We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information.
In some cases, however, we may provide information to legal officials as described in “Compliance with Legal Process” below.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155144</id>
	<title>Eating a pussy is cool, but eating pussy is not?</title>
	<author>RiotingPacifist</author>
	<datestamp>1258640580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Still on the site is the story of how some guy killed and ate a cat (is that even legal?), but that is ofc fine, however the guy posting an innuendo obviously went too far!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Still on the site is the story of how some guy killed and ate a cat ( is that even legal ?
) , but that is ofc fine , however the guy posting an innuendo obviously went too far !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Still on the site is the story of how some guy killed and ate a cat (is that even legal?
), but that is ofc fine, however the guy posting an innuendo obviously went too far!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155542</id>
	<title>Remember ...</title>
	<author>Akita24</author>
	<datestamp>1258642920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext> It's freedom of the press not freedom of speech<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... oh wait<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...

I'm not sure what pisses me off more, that this happened at all, or that the person ratting out his source was the newspaper guy. Incredible.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's freedom of the press not freedom of speech ... oh wait .. . I 'm not sure what pisses me off more , that this happened at all , or that the person ratting out his source was the newspaper guy .
Incredible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> It's freedom of the press not freedom of speech ... oh wait ...

I'm not sure what pisses me off more, that this happened at all, or that the person ratting out his source was the newspaper guy.
Incredible.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30159102</id>
	<title>Re:I see a lot of weak people here in the story...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258654740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Lesson learned: When making anonymous posts, use... a friend's computer.</p></div><p>Thanks, dicknose.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lesson learned : When making anonymous posts , use... a friend 's computer.Thanks , dicknose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lesson learned: When making anonymous posts, use... a friend's computer.Thanks, dicknose.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156454</id>
	<title>Re:Would this journalist protect his sources?</title>
	<author>theskipper</author>
	<datestamp>1258646760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's quite unfair to <i>labial</i> all journalists that way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's quite unfair to labial all journalists that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's quite unfair to labial all journalists that way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156782</id>
	<title>Re:Kurt Greenbaum, you are stupid, puritanical scu</title>
	<author>ArsenneLupin</author>
	<datestamp>1258647840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Of course, I can't attach these comments to the article itself, because comments are disabled there now even though the story is only three days old.</p></div><p>There is another food-related story on now, to which you can still post: <a href="http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/talk-of-the-day/talk-of-the-day/2009/11/have-you-ever-truly-gone-hungry/comment-page-4/#comments" title="stltoday.com">Have you ever truly gone hungry?</a> [stltoday.com]. Just post your comments and followup jokes there instead. Just use a suitable proxy if you value your continued employment.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , I ca n't attach these comments to the article itself , because comments are disabled there now even though the story is only three days old.There is another food-related story on now , to which you can still post : Have you ever truly gone hungry ?
[ stltoday.com ] . Just post your comments and followup jokes there instead .
Just use a suitable proxy if you value your continued employment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, I can't attach these comments to the article itself, because comments are disabled there now even though the story is only three days old.There is another food-related story on now, to which you can still post: Have you ever truly gone hungry?
[stltoday.com]. Just post your comments and followup jokes there instead.
Just use a suitable proxy if you value your continued employment.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155310</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>SleepingWaterBear</author>
	<datestamp>1258641720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It is also worth noting that the school didn't fire him, but that he quit on the spot... or so says the story, but that's irrelevant anyways. The guy had it coming.</p></div><p>Ok, we're all agreed the guy was an idiot idiot for posting at all.  But he 'had it coming?'  Really?  Suppose instead he'd made two posts to slashdot in that time - a clear misuse of school property - would he deserve to lose his job then?  What if he'd posted and reposted a critique on some sort of scientology blog - would he deserve to lose his job then?  It seems to me that the reason this guy lost his job is because he violated the ridiculous community morals of a small town, not because of anything to do with misuse of school resources.</p><p>At one point in my life I seriously considered becoming a teacher, but I realized that doing so would likely place me at the mercy of the sorts of unthinking bigoted responses we're seeing here.  This attitude is at least part of the reason our public education system is failing - the work environment is so unpleasant that (with the exception of a few saints) no one with another option for a career would do it.  Would you really want to work beside people who are so shocked by a couple one word internet posts that you can't work with them anymore?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is also worth noting that the school did n't fire him , but that he quit on the spot... or so says the story , but that 's irrelevant anyways .
The guy had it coming.Ok , we 're all agreed the guy was an idiot idiot for posting at all .
But he 'had it coming ?
' Really ?
Suppose instead he 'd made two posts to slashdot in that time - a clear misuse of school property - would he deserve to lose his job then ?
What if he 'd posted and reposted a critique on some sort of scientology blog - would he deserve to lose his job then ?
It seems to me that the reason this guy lost his job is because he violated the ridiculous community morals of a small town , not because of anything to do with misuse of school resources.At one point in my life I seriously considered becoming a teacher , but I realized that doing so would likely place me at the mercy of the sorts of unthinking bigoted responses we 're seeing here .
This attitude is at least part of the reason our public education system is failing - the work environment is so unpleasant that ( with the exception of a few saints ) no one with another option for a career would do it .
Would you really want to work beside people who are so shocked by a couple one word internet posts that you ca n't work with them anymore ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is also worth noting that the school didn't fire him, but that he quit on the spot... or so says the story, but that's irrelevant anyways.
The guy had it coming.Ok, we're all agreed the guy was an idiot idiot for posting at all.
But he 'had it coming?
'  Really?
Suppose instead he'd made two posts to slashdot in that time - a clear misuse of school property - would he deserve to lose his job then?
What if he'd posted and reposted a critique on some sort of scientology blog - would he deserve to lose his job then?
It seems to me that the reason this guy lost his job is because he violated the ridiculous community morals of a small town, not because of anything to do with misuse of school resources.At one point in my life I seriously considered becoming a teacher, but I realized that doing so would likely place me at the mercy of the sorts of unthinking bigoted responses we're seeing here.
This attitude is at least part of the reason our public education system is failing - the work environment is so unpleasant that (with the exception of a few saints) no one with another option for a career would do it.
Would you really want to work beside people who are so shocked by a couple one word internet posts that you can't work with them anymore?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30158384</id>
	<title>RTFA:  The Fool Quit, He/She Was Not Fired....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258652580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fully read the article, then discuss the following summary:</p><p>A fool used the equipment at the school where he works to do something publicly ugly.  The person accountable for dealing with the foolishness contacted the fool's employer.  The employer spoke to the fool.  The fool quit his job.  End of story.</p><p>Have your discussion address the following points:<br>A fool's rights over his/her own personal property rights versus the same fool's rights over *your* personal property;<br>The obligation of a public communications medium like a mainstream US newspaper with a web outlet to provide a generally acceptable content;<br>A fool's rights to public sympathy and support for his/her personal stupidity.  (HINT:  This is the point where you can actually make a case the fool was right all along and has been horribly wronged!!!)</p><p>Seriously people, the government did not screw this guy over, the newspaper dude (even though I think calling the school is jerky) did not screw the guy out of a job, the school principal didn't fire him.... HE/SHE QUIT!   They felt their actions were profoundly wrong enough that they left there job.</p><p>There is nothing to see here, move along.  Address a real issue like Chinese net censorship or Iranian nuclear arms, thanks!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fully read the article , then discuss the following summary : A fool used the equipment at the school where he works to do something publicly ugly .
The person accountable for dealing with the foolishness contacted the fool 's employer .
The employer spoke to the fool .
The fool quit his job .
End of story.Have your discussion address the following points : A fool 's rights over his/her own personal property rights versus the same fool 's rights over * your * personal property ; The obligation of a public communications medium like a mainstream US newspaper with a web outlet to provide a generally acceptable content ; A fool 's rights to public sympathy and support for his/her personal stupidity .
( HINT : This is the point where you can actually make a case the fool was right all along and has been horribly wronged ! ! !
) Seriously people , the government did not screw this guy over , the newspaper dude ( even though I think calling the school is jerky ) did not screw the guy out of a job , the school principal did n't fire him.... HE/SHE QUIT !
They felt their actions were profoundly wrong enough that they left there job.There is nothing to see here , move along .
Address a real issue like Chinese net censorship or Iranian nuclear arms , thanks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fully read the article, then discuss the following summary:A fool used the equipment at the school where he works to do something publicly ugly.
The person accountable for dealing with the foolishness contacted the fool's employer.
The employer spoke to the fool.
The fool quit his job.
End of story.Have your discussion address the following points:A fool's rights over his/her own personal property rights versus the same fool's rights over *your* personal property;The obligation of a public communications medium like a mainstream US newspaper with a web outlet to provide a generally acceptable content;A fool's rights to public sympathy and support for his/her personal stupidity.
(HINT:  This is the point where you can actually make a case the fool was right all along and has been horribly wronged!!!
)Seriously people, the government did not screw this guy over, the newspaper dude (even though I think calling the school is jerky) did not screw the guy out of a job, the school principal didn't fire him.... HE/SHE QUIT!
They felt their actions were profoundly wrong enough that they left there job.There is nothing to see here, move along.
Address a real issue like Chinese net censorship or Iranian nuclear arms, thanks!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155006</id>
	<title>Punishment way out of proportion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258639620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So a guy loses his job and ability to pay bills and a mortgage because of a harmless blog post?</p><p>That seems pretty damn harsh. Yeah, the guy was silly for posting from a traceable work IP, but the consequences were waaay out of proportion with what was done.</p><p>Oooh, someone said "Pussy". Quick, somebody get the internet fun police! There's Immorality going on!</p><p>Kurt Greenbaum is a pussy who should be ashamed of himself. Nobody needs you being internet police man, just piss off. Pussy.</p><p>Every post he makes should have as many "Pussy" replies as possible for a week.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So a guy loses his job and ability to pay bills and a mortgage because of a harmless blog post ? That seems pretty damn harsh .
Yeah , the guy was silly for posting from a traceable work IP , but the consequences were waaay out of proportion with what was done.Oooh , someone said " Pussy " .
Quick , somebody get the internet fun police !
There 's Immorality going on ! Kurt Greenbaum is a pussy who should be ashamed of himself .
Nobody needs you being internet police man , just piss off .
Pussy.Every post he makes should have as many " Pussy " replies as possible for a week .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So a guy loses his job and ability to pay bills and a mortgage because of a harmless blog post?That seems pretty damn harsh.
Yeah, the guy was silly for posting from a traceable work IP, but the consequences were waaay out of proportion with what was done.Oooh, someone said "Pussy".
Quick, somebody get the internet fun police!
There's Immorality going on!Kurt Greenbaum is a pussy who should be ashamed of himself.
Nobody needs you being internet police man, just piss off.
Pussy.Every post he makes should have as many "Pussy" replies as possible for a week.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155942</id>
	<title>Re:I see a lot of weak people here in the story...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258644840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wonder where - in the St. Louis Dispatch policies - it states for employees to track down the ip address of those making offensive (but not illegal) posts and then contact the work.</p></div><p>Right here:  <a href="http://www.stltoday.com/help/privacy-policy" title="stltoday.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.stltoday.com/help/privacy-policy</a> [stltoday.com] </p><p><div class="quote"><p>Our web servers automatically collect limited information about your computer's connection to the Internet, including your IP address (but not the e-mail address), when you visit our sites. Your IP address does not contain personally identifiable information, nor does it identify you personally.</p></div><p>Oh wait...</p><p>Well, maybe here:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information. In some cases, however, we may provide information to legal officials as described in "Compliance with Legal Process" below.</p> </div><p>Hmm no, that would make what he did against his own terms of service...<br>But wait, i see that compliance with legal process part now, so I'm sure it gives them permission there:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Compliance with Legal Process<br>We may disclose personal information if we or one of our affiliated companies is required by law to disclose personal information, or if we believe in good faith that such action is necessary to comply with a law or some legal process, to protect or defend our rights and property, to protect against misuse or unauthorized use of our web sites or to protect the personal safety or property of our users or the public.</p> </div><p>Oh, holy crap.  No laws were broken, so nothing in their terms states they can do this, and plenty of places state they can't.</p><p>If anyone needs fired, it's the ass at this paper that violated his own companies TOS, as well as broke the law to do it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder where - in the St. Louis Dispatch policies - it states for employees to track down the ip address of those making offensive ( but not illegal ) posts and then contact the work.Right here : http : //www.stltoday.com/help/privacy-policy [ stltoday.com ] Our web servers automatically collect limited information about your computer 's connection to the Internet , including your IP address ( but not the e-mail address ) , when you visit our sites .
Your IP address does not contain personally identifiable information , nor does it identify you personally.Oh wait...Well , maybe here : We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information .
In some cases , however , we may provide information to legal officials as described in " Compliance with Legal Process " below .
Hmm no , that would make what he did against his own terms of service...But wait , i see that compliance with legal process part now , so I 'm sure it gives them permission there : Compliance with Legal ProcessWe may disclose personal information if we or one of our affiliated companies is required by law to disclose personal information , or if we believe in good faith that such action is necessary to comply with a law or some legal process , to protect or defend our rights and property , to protect against misuse or unauthorized use of our web sites or to protect the personal safety or property of our users or the public .
Oh , holy crap .
No laws were broken , so nothing in their terms states they can do this , and plenty of places state they ca n't.If anyone needs fired , it 's the ass at this paper that violated his own companies TOS , as well as broke the law to do it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder where - in the St. Louis Dispatch policies - it states for employees to track down the ip address of those making offensive (but not illegal) posts and then contact the work.Right here:  http://www.stltoday.com/help/privacy-policy [stltoday.com] Our web servers automatically collect limited information about your computer's connection to the Internet, including your IP address (but not the e-mail address), when you visit our sites.
Your IP address does not contain personally identifiable information, nor does it identify you personally.Oh wait...Well, maybe here:We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information.
In some cases, however, we may provide information to legal officials as described in "Compliance with Legal Process" below.
Hmm no, that would make what he did against his own terms of service...But wait, i see that compliance with legal process part now, so I'm sure it gives them permission there:Compliance with Legal ProcessWe may disclose personal information if we or one of our affiliated companies is required by law to disclose personal information, or if we believe in good faith that such action is necessary to comply with a law or some legal process, to protect or defend our rights and property, to protect against misuse or unauthorized use of our web sites or to protect the personal safety or property of our users or the public.
Oh, holy crap.
No laws were broken, so nothing in their terms states they can do this, and plenty of places state they can't.If anyone needs fired, it's the ass at this paper that violated his own companies TOS, as well as broke the law to do it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30160014</id>
	<title>Re:Would this journalist protect his sources?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258657440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A good tongue-lashing is in order</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A good tongue-lashing is in order</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A good tongue-lashing is in order</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155358</id>
	<title>Re:Pay back</title>
	<author>csartanis</author>
	<datestamp>1258641960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did Kurt Greenbaum rape and murder a young girl in 1990?  Heh, just kidding!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did Kurt Greenbaum rape and murder a young girl in 1990 ?
Heh , just kidding !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did Kurt Greenbaum rape and murder a young girl in 1990?
Heh, just kidding!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155768</id>
	<title>Escalating discipline</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258644120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this guy was posting from home I'd be more defensive of his free speech (although I still think that something that would be inappropriate as a Letter To The Editor is still inappropriate as a comment on a general purpose newspaper). But the rules for personal use of computers at work usually includes not doing anything that will bring embarrassment or legal action against your employer.</p><p>This is something he should not have done, but even then termination seems excessive. There's a concept of "escalating discipline" in which an employee is first given warnings and minor punishments before escalating to major punishments and termination. That gives them fair warning that what they did was wrong and allows them a chance to reform. Immediate termination is reserved for infractions that are extreme and indefensible.</p><p>So maybe we're missing part of the story. Maybe this guy works in a situation where vulgar sexual expressions are really creepy. I don't mind the fact that teachers reproduce, but my 8-year-old daughter's soccer coach doesn't need to be talking about oral sex in the locker room. Or maybe this guy had a history of misbehavior, and the IT guy was happy to have hard evidence to catch him red handed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this guy was posting from home I 'd be more defensive of his free speech ( although I still think that something that would be inappropriate as a Letter To The Editor is still inappropriate as a comment on a general purpose newspaper ) .
But the rules for personal use of computers at work usually includes not doing anything that will bring embarrassment or legal action against your employer.This is something he should not have done , but even then termination seems excessive .
There 's a concept of " escalating discipline " in which an employee is first given warnings and minor punishments before escalating to major punishments and termination .
That gives them fair warning that what they did was wrong and allows them a chance to reform .
Immediate termination is reserved for infractions that are extreme and indefensible.So maybe we 're missing part of the story .
Maybe this guy works in a situation where vulgar sexual expressions are really creepy .
I do n't mind the fact that teachers reproduce , but my 8-year-old daughter 's soccer coach does n't need to be talking about oral sex in the locker room .
Or maybe this guy had a history of misbehavior , and the IT guy was happy to have hard evidence to catch him red handed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this guy was posting from home I'd be more defensive of his free speech (although I still think that something that would be inappropriate as a Letter To The Editor is still inappropriate as a comment on a general purpose newspaper).
But the rules for personal use of computers at work usually includes not doing anything that will bring embarrassment or legal action against your employer.This is something he should not have done, but even then termination seems excessive.
There's a concept of "escalating discipline" in which an employee is first given warnings and minor punishments before escalating to major punishments and termination.
That gives them fair warning that what they did was wrong and allows them a chance to reform.
Immediate termination is reserved for infractions that are extreme and indefensible.So maybe we're missing part of the story.
Maybe this guy works in a situation where vulgar sexual expressions are really creepy.
I don't mind the fact that teachers reproduce, but my 8-year-old daughter's soccer coach doesn't need to be talking about oral sex in the locker room.
Or maybe this guy had a history of misbehavior, and the IT guy was happy to have hard evidence to catch him red handed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156226</id>
	<title>Re:Eating a pussy is cool, but eating pussy is not</title>
	<author>thisnamestoolong</author>
	<datestamp>1258645800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is eating a cat worse than eating a cow, a pig, or a chicken? You are biased as our society happens to keep cats as pets, that is the only reason.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is eating a cat worse than eating a cow , a pig , or a chicken ?
You are biased as our society happens to keep cats as pets , that is the only reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is eating a cat worse than eating a cow, a pig, or a chicken?
You are biased as our society happens to keep cats as pets, that is the only reason.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155820</id>
	<title>Re:Srsly?</title>
	<author>omnichad</author>
	<datestamp>1258644300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Try the St. Louis Post Dispatch for news.   They are busy with important stuff like news.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try the St. Louis Post Dispatch for news .
They are busy with important stuff like news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try the St. Louis Post Dispatch for news.
They are busy with important stuff like news.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30167768</id>
	<title>Think of the children.</title>
	<author>DarkofPeace</author>
	<datestamp>1258648560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm about tired of this bullshit line of thinking. This is the 2nd or 3rd story this week I read about teachers being fired for "conduct" outside the classroom. The other one that stood out was a domestic violence against the teacher and she was fired. We already have a shortage of good educators and with "no child left behind" I fear for the future. Thinking of the children is going to create the dumbest, ill prepared children in history.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm about tired of this bullshit line of thinking .
This is the 2nd or 3rd story this week I read about teachers being fired for " conduct " outside the classroom .
The other one that stood out was a domestic violence against the teacher and she was fired .
We already have a shortage of good educators and with " no child left behind " I fear for the future .
Thinking of the children is going to create the dumbest , ill prepared children in history .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm about tired of this bullshit line of thinking.
This is the 2nd or 3rd story this week I read about teachers being fired for "conduct" outside the classroom.
The other one that stood out was a domestic violence against the teacher and she was fired.
We already have a shortage of good educators and with "no child left behind" I fear for the future.
Thinking of the children is going to create the dumbest, ill prepared children in history.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155250</id>
	<title>Re:Kurt Greenbaum, you are stupid, puritanical scu</title>
	<author>Spazztastic</author>
	<datestamp>1258641360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Using the word 'pussy' on school time is simply not that bad. Of course, I can't attach these comments to the article itself, because comments are disabled there now even though the story is only three days old.</p></div><p>I wonder if 4chan will catch wind of this. Kurt just opened a whole can of worms in this case. If he really thinks that one person being inappropriate is bad, imagine every AC from<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. trolling his comment section.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Using the word 'pussy ' on school time is simply not that bad .
Of course , I ca n't attach these comments to the article itself , because comments are disabled there now even though the story is only three days old.I wonder if 4chan will catch wind of this .
Kurt just opened a whole can of worms in this case .
If he really thinks that one person being inappropriate is bad , imagine every AC from / .
trolling his comment section .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using the word 'pussy' on school time is simply not that bad.
Of course, I can't attach these comments to the article itself, because comments are disabled there now even though the story is only three days old.I wonder if 4chan will catch wind of this.
Kurt just opened a whole can of worms in this case.
If he really thinks that one person being inappropriate is bad, imagine every AC from /.
trolling his comment section.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155206</id>
	<title>Re:He got it coming</title>
	<author>intheshelter</author>
	<datestamp>1258641060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Now I can't way to see the juvenile posters making this a case of libertarian freedom of speech"</p><p>- And who can blame them after your juvenile post blathering about "being on the clock".  Jeez, wake up and realize that nitpicking about being on the clock was never the point of this discussion.  The point was why the hell was that asshole tracking commenters down?  What kind of a dickhead reports someone for posting on the very message board that he left open for comments?</p><p>Don't want comments, shut down that functionality.  If you do want comments either moderate them or just deal with a few vulgar posts.  And whatever you do, don't post the question "what is the grossest thing you've ever eaten" and not be smart enough to see the comments that are coming your way.</p><p>While the posts were a bit juvenile and the guy shouldn't have done it during school hours, they aren't noteworthy enough to cost a person his job.  The most juvenile act in this story was the vindictive way the guy was hunted down.  Sorry, but put it in perspective and realize it's just one little word.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Now I ca n't way to see the juvenile posters making this a case of libertarian freedom of speech " - And who can blame them after your juvenile post blathering about " being on the clock " .
Jeez , wake up and realize that nitpicking about being on the clock was never the point of this discussion .
The point was why the hell was that asshole tracking commenters down ?
What kind of a dickhead reports someone for posting on the very message board that he left open for comments ? Do n't want comments , shut down that functionality .
If you do want comments either moderate them or just deal with a few vulgar posts .
And whatever you do , do n't post the question " what is the grossest thing you 've ever eaten " and not be smart enough to see the comments that are coming your way.While the posts were a bit juvenile and the guy should n't have done it during school hours , they are n't noteworthy enough to cost a person his job .
The most juvenile act in this story was the vindictive way the guy was hunted down .
Sorry , but put it in perspective and realize it 's just one little word .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Now I can't way to see the juvenile posters making this a case of libertarian freedom of speech"- And who can blame them after your juvenile post blathering about "being on the clock".
Jeez, wake up and realize that nitpicking about being on the clock was never the point of this discussion.
The point was why the hell was that asshole tracking commenters down?
What kind of a dickhead reports someone for posting on the very message board that he left open for comments?Don't want comments, shut down that functionality.
If you do want comments either moderate them or just deal with a few vulgar posts.
And whatever you do, don't post the question "what is the grossest thing you've ever eaten" and not be smart enough to see the comments that are coming your way.While the posts were a bit juvenile and the guy shouldn't have done it during school hours, they aren't noteworthy enough to cost a person his job.
The most juvenile act in this story was the vindictive way the guy was hunted down.
Sorry, but put it in perspective and realize it's just one little word.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30163986</id>
	<title>Re:Kurt Greenbaum, you are stupid, puritanical scu</title>
	<author>frisket</author>
	<datestamp>1258626900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Using the word 'pussy' on school time is simply not that bad.</p></div><p>Of course it's not. Only Americans get upset about this kind of thing. Sure, the school guy was a dickhead, and the newspaper guy was an asshole, but the school principal should have had the guts just to thank the newspaper politely and inform them that the matter would be dealt with, and then reprimand the OP.</p><p>Instead you've got the civil liberties crowd indulging in a lot of bleeding-heart willy-waving about "rights", and the politically-correct crowd going all anal-retentive and thin-lipped about "abuse" of an employer's PC. Any wonder the country's gone to the dogs^H^H^H^Hcats^H^H^H^Hpussies...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Using the word 'pussy ' on school time is simply not that bad.Of course it 's not .
Only Americans get upset about this kind of thing .
Sure , the school guy was a dickhead , and the newspaper guy was an asshole , but the school principal should have had the guts just to thank the newspaper politely and inform them that the matter would be dealt with , and then reprimand the OP.Instead you 've got the civil liberties crowd indulging in a lot of bleeding-heart willy-waving about " rights " , and the politically-correct crowd going all anal-retentive and thin-lipped about " abuse " of an employer 's PC .
Any wonder the country 's gone to the dogs ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ Hcats ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ Hpussies.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using the word 'pussy' on school time is simply not that bad.Of course it's not.
Only Americans get upset about this kind of thing.
Sure, the school guy was a dickhead, and the newspaper guy was an asshole, but the school principal should have had the guts just to thank the newspaper politely and inform them that the matter would be dealt with, and then reprimand the OP.Instead you've got the civil liberties crowd indulging in a lot of bleeding-heart willy-waving about "rights", and the politically-correct crowd going all anal-retentive and thin-lipped about "abuse" of an employer's PC.
Any wonder the country's gone to the dogs^H^H^H^Hcats^H^H^H^Hpussies...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155274</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1258641540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree.</p><p>It was an anonymous poll.</p><p>Part of the playing field in an ANONYMOUS poll is the ANONYMOUS part.</p><p>If you see a post you don't like, you are free to delete it.</p><p>Unless you find something that makes you suspect illegal activity is taking place, tracking down the submitter of a certain poll result is absolutely unjustified.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree.It was an anonymous poll.Part of the playing field in an ANONYMOUS poll is the ANONYMOUS part.If you see a post you do n't like , you are free to delete it.Unless you find something that makes you suspect illegal activity is taking place , tracking down the submitter of a certain poll result is absolutely unjustified .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.It was an anonymous poll.Part of the playing field in an ANONYMOUS poll is the ANONYMOUS part.If you see a post you don't like, you are free to delete it.Unless you find something that makes you suspect illegal activity is taking place, tracking down the submitter of a certain poll result is absolutely unjustified.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155464</id>
	<title>He ate a cat!?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258642500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's disgusting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's disgusting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's disgusting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30189062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156406
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30162694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30164860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30162398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30162102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30163986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30162572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30161264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30166788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30165856
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30166844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30167082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155554
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30188922
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30160634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30164342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30161804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30163884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30159656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30159114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30158964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30182074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30159102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30160982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30159402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30189128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30165956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30164134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30160014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30166760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30161794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30166822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_0526239_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30159220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30164764
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156160
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155358
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30161804
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30159402
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30163884
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30164860
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155458
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155554
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30166822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30166788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30159102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156740
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30160634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155546
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155232
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30160014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155644
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156374
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30161264
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156504
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30159220
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30165956
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155274
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156406
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155556
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30166760
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30162102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30162572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30162398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157980
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155550
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155314
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155698
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30164342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155250
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30164134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155072
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30163986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155468
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30159114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157818
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155552
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156226
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30161794
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30189128
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30160982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30166844
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155820
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30162274
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155236
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157214
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30161138
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155006
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30158384
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30158964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30162694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30159656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155960
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30157720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30156002
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30189062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155200
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30165856
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30167082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155310
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155206
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30188922
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30182074
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30155434
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_0526239.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_0526239.30154942
</commentlist>
</conversation>
