<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_18_2343236</id>
	<title>Bomb-Proof Wallpaper Developed<span class="vballoon-marquee rd\_5"><span>Comments:</span><a href="#">388</a></span></title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1258569060000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>MikeChino writes <i>"Working in partnership with the US Army Corp of Engineers, Berry Plastics has rolled out a new breed of <a href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/11/18/bomb-proof-wallpaper-could-save-you-in-a-natural-disaster/">bomb-proof wallpaper</a>. Dubbed the X-Flex Blast Protection System, the wallpaper is so effective that a single layer can keep a wrecking ball from smashing through a brick wall, and a double layer can stop blunt objects (i.e. a flying 2&#215;4) from knocking down drywall. According to its designers, covering an entire room takes less than an hour."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>MikeChino writes " Working in partnership with the US Army Corp of Engineers , Berry Plastics has rolled out a new breed of bomb-proof wallpaper .
Dubbed the X-Flex Blast Protection System , the wallpaper is so effective that a single layer can keep a wrecking ball from smashing through a brick wall , and a double layer can stop blunt objects ( i.e .
a flying 2   4 ) from knocking down drywall .
According to its designers , covering an entire room takes less than an hour .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MikeChino writes "Working in partnership with the US Army Corp of Engineers, Berry Plastics has rolled out a new breed of bomb-proof wallpaper.
Dubbed the X-Flex Blast Protection System, the wallpaper is so effective that a single layer can keep a wrecking ball from smashing through a brick wall, and a double layer can stop blunt objects (i.e.
a flying 2×4) from knocking down drywall.
According to its designers, covering an entire room takes less than an hour.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155462</id>
	<title>Re:missing the point</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258642500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sure you already know this, but the vacuum doesn't "lift" the roof or "tear" the walls. The higher pressure inside the house compared to the lower pressure outside causes these things. (It is a push from inside, not a phantom "pull" from outside).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure you already know this , but the vacuum does n't " lift " the roof or " tear " the walls .
The higher pressure inside the house compared to the lower pressure outside causes these things .
( It is a push from inside , not a phantom " pull " from outside ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure you already know this, but the vacuum doesn't "lift" the roof or "tear" the walls.
The higher pressure inside the house compared to the lower pressure outside causes these things.
(It is a push from inside, not a phantom "pull" from outside).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153812</id>
	<title>Re:Idle?</title>
	<author>MrMista\_B</author>
	<datestamp>1258663680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because the editors are trying to scam you into thinking Idle isn't the craphole it really is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the editors are trying to scam you into thinking Idle is n't the craphole it really is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because the editors are trying to scam you into thinking Idle isn't the craphole it really is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153776</id>
	<title>Re:Forget bombs, think hurricanes and tornados!</title>
	<author>underqualified</author>
	<datestamp>1258663020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>fuck that. let's try it on comets!</htmltext>
<tokenext>fuck that .
let 's try it on comets !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fuck that.
let's try it on comets!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30158192</id>
	<title>Re:Fire fighter survival....</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1258651920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's attached to an exterior brick wall or concrete wall is special circumstances.<br><a href="http://xflexsystem.com/content.aspx?page=technology" title="xflexsystem.com">http://xflexsystem.com/content.aspx?page=technology</a> [xflexsystem.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's attached to an exterior brick wall or concrete wall is special circumstances.http : //xflexsystem.com/content.aspx ? page = technology [ xflexsystem.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's attached to an exterior brick wall or concrete wall is special circumstances.http://xflexsystem.com/content.aspx?page=technology [xflexsystem.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154816</id>
	<title>Chipotle away</title>
	<author>whitedsepdivine</author>
	<datestamp>1258637580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Chipotle - away" not working for you any more either?  They said it was bomb-proof not blood-proof sadly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Chipotle - away " not working for you any more either ?
They said it was bomb-proof not blood-proof sadly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Chipotle - away" not working for you any more either?
They said it was bomb-proof not blood-proof sadly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153962</id>
	<title>Re:Fire fighter survival....</title>
	<author>NeutronCowboy</author>
	<datestamp>1258623300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure if you're aware, but many countries have lots of buildings that are basically brick or rock, including internal walls. Firefighters don't die more there than anywhere else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure if you 're aware , but many countries have lots of buildings that are basically brick or rock , including internal walls .
Firefighters do n't die more there than anywhere else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure if you're aware, but many countries have lots of buildings that are basically brick or rock, including internal walls.
Firefighters don't die more there than anywhere else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153916</id>
	<title>What if</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258622700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>an unstoppable cannon ball hits and unbreakable wall?</htmltext>
<tokenext>an unstoppable cannon ball hits and unbreakable wall ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>an unstoppable cannon ball hits and unbreakable wall?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30159122</id>
	<title>Re:Fire fighter survival....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258654800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>lol had this issue in china, we had applied a security film to the windows of a house, the firefighters took an extra 15 min breaking through the windows to get into the house</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lol had this issue in china , we had applied a security film to the windows of a house , the firefighters took an extra 15 min breaking through the windows to get into the house</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lol had this issue in china, we had applied a security film to the windows of a house, the firefighters took an extra 15 min breaking through the windows to get into the house</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155032</id>
	<title>Re:missing the point</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258639800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately the wall paper will provide little protection in tornado alley because:</p><p>1. Ballistic 2 by 4's will still fly through your windows  -- depending on your luck yours or the neighbor's flying glass will make all outside rooms uninhabitable if the tornado hits just right.<br>2. The vacuum outside your house will still lift the roof off and then dump some of it into the house<br>3. If it is more violent, the vacuum will still tear walls off the structure</p><p>So<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... when you look for a house be sure that you end up in one with:<br>1. a windowless bathroom because small rooms in the center of the house are structurally much sounder than big ones and safer -- a walk-in closet in the middle of the house is OK too but the extra framing in most bathrooms makes them very sturdy.  A bathroom in a basement may be optimum.<br>2. a tub to provide even more protection for a child or two or a wife or other vulnerable human<br>3. a basement that will permit you to build a a simple but sturdy shelter to keep falling debris and flying objects out<br>4. a weather radio operating 24/7 in alarm mode to give you the extra seconds you need to take shelter<br>5. failing all but 4, above, the place you live has a public shelter within easy reach when your alarm says scramble.</p><p>Then, even though you want the fame of being a great videographer, don't pause on the way to the shelter to take pictures of the tornado you see advancing.  That one is but a distraction to help the one that is dropping out of the sky just above you wipe you out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately the wall paper will provide little protection in tornado alley because : 1 .
Ballistic 2 by 4 's will still fly through your windows -- depending on your luck yours or the neighbor 's flying glass will make all outside rooms uninhabitable if the tornado hits just right.2 .
The vacuum outside your house will still lift the roof off and then dump some of it into the house3 .
If it is more violent , the vacuum will still tear walls off the structureSo ... when you look for a house be sure that you end up in one with : 1. a windowless bathroom because small rooms in the center of the house are structurally much sounder than big ones and safer -- a walk-in closet in the middle of the house is OK too but the extra framing in most bathrooms makes them very sturdy .
A bathroom in a basement may be optimum.2 .
a tub to provide even more protection for a child or two or a wife or other vulnerable human3 .
a basement that will permit you to build a a simple but sturdy shelter to keep falling debris and flying objects out4 .
a weather radio operating 24/7 in alarm mode to give you the extra seconds you need to take shelter5 .
failing all but 4 , above , the place you live has a public shelter within easy reach when your alarm says scramble.Then , even though you want the fame of being a great videographer , do n't pause on the way to the shelter to take pictures of the tornado you see advancing .
That one is but a distraction to help the one that is dropping out of the sky just above you wipe you out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately the wall paper will provide little protection in tornado alley because:1.
Ballistic 2 by 4's will still fly through your windows  -- depending on your luck yours or the neighbor's flying glass will make all outside rooms uninhabitable if the tornado hits just right.2.
The vacuum outside your house will still lift the roof off and then dump some of it into the house3.
If it is more violent, the vacuum will still tear walls off the structureSo ... when you look for a house be sure that you end up in one with:1. a windowless bathroom because small rooms in the center of the house are structurally much sounder than big ones and safer -- a walk-in closet in the middle of the house is OK too but the extra framing in most bathrooms makes them very sturdy.
A bathroom in a basement may be optimum.2.
a tub to provide even more protection for a child or two or a wife or other vulnerable human3.
a basement that will permit you to build a a simple but sturdy shelter to keep falling debris and flying objects out4.
a weather radio operating 24/7 in alarm mode to give you the extra seconds you need to take shelter5.
failing all but 4, above, the place you live has a public shelter within easy reach when your alarm says scramble.Then, even though you want the fame of being a great videographer, don't pause on the way to the shelter to take pictures of the tornado you see advancing.
That one is but a distraction to help the one that is dropping out of the sky just above you wipe you out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154776</id>
	<title>That pattern...</title>
	<author>Tribbin</author>
	<datestamp>1258636800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That pattern will be sooo 2012.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That pattern will be sooo 2012 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That pattern will be sooo 2012.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30171064</id>
	<title>Re:missing the point</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258732500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>4. a weather radio operating 24/7 in alarm mode to give you the extra seconds you need to take shelter</p></div><p>Pfff. I just surf 4chan, I get most major news before it even breaks in the local media.</p><p>Kinda not even kidding.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>4. a weather radio operating 24/7 in alarm mode to give you the extra seconds you need to take shelterPfff .
I just surf 4chan , I get most major news before it even breaks in the local media.Kinda not even kidding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4. a weather radio operating 24/7 in alarm mode to give you the extra seconds you need to take shelterPfff.
I just surf 4chan, I get most major news before it even breaks in the local media.Kinda not even kidding.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30156890</id>
	<title>Bomb-proof is a two way street</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258648140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bomb-proof wallpaper is great -- if the bomb goes off outside. If someone sets off a bomb INSIDE, it wll keep the force inside the room.  Result? Soldier soup!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bomb-proof wallpaper is great -- if the bomb goes off outside .
If someone sets off a bomb INSIDE , it wll keep the force inside the room .
Result ? Soldier soup !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bomb-proof wallpaper is great -- if the bomb goes off outside.
If someone sets off a bomb INSIDE, it wll keep the force inside the room.
Result? Soldier soup!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30159920</id>
	<title>Re:Fire fighter survival....</title>
	<author>nasch</author>
	<datestamp>1258657200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think you'd be putting this stuff on interior walls, would you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think you 'd be putting this stuff on interior walls , would you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think you'd be putting this stuff on interior walls, would you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154300</id>
	<title>Re:how flexible is it?</title>
	<author>Nathrael</author>
	<datestamp>1258628700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or maybe he's <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ca6sVJzqb7A" title="youtube.com">Superman.</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or maybe he 's Superman .
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or maybe he's Superman.
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153788</id>
	<title>Embed in concrete</title>
	<author>handy\_vandal</author>
	<datestamp>1258663080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about embedding kevlar-web in concrete? As a building technique generally.  Earthquake resistance?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about embedding kevlar-web in concrete ?
As a building technique generally .
Earthquake resistance ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about embedding kevlar-web in concrete?
As a building technique generally.
Earthquake resistance?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154092</id>
	<title>twin towers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258625460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if only he twin towers would have been covered with it....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if only he twin towers would have been covered with it... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if only he twin towers would have been covered with it....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30157538</id>
	<title>How many layers would help against MOAB?</title>
	<author>mi</author>
	<datestamp>1258650060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How much of this stuff do the Iranians need to protect their nuclear facilities against the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bunker\_busting" title="wikipedia.org">bunker-busting</a> [wikipedia.org] ordnance?

</p><p>Those "toys" can go through many feet of <em>reinforced concrete</em> &mdash; maybe, that material will now go the way of the CRT-monitors?..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How much of this stuff do the Iranians need to protect their nuclear facilities against the bunker-busting [ wikipedia.org ] ordnance ?
Those " toys " can go through many feet of reinforced concrete    maybe , that material will now go the way of the CRT-monitors ? . .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much of this stuff do the Iranians need to protect their nuclear facilities against the bunker-busting [wikipedia.org] ordnance?
Those "toys" can go through many feet of reinforced concrete — maybe, that material will now go the way of the CRT-monitors?..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154562</id>
	<title>Re:Forget bombs, think hurricanes and tornados!</title>
	<author>Rockoon</author>
	<datestamp>1258633020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If this can stop projectiles from penetrating the wall, then think about the protection it could offer from tornados and hurricanes.</p> </div><p>
I am imagining a bag made up of blast-proof wallpaper rolling down the road, filled with the pulverized remains of a human and his things.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this can stop projectiles from penetrating the wall , then think about the protection it could offer from tornados and hurricanes .
I am imagining a bag made up of blast-proof wallpaper rolling down the road , filled with the pulverized remains of a human and his things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this can stop projectiles from penetrating the wall, then think about the protection it could offer from tornados and hurricanes.
I am imagining a bag made up of blast-proof wallpaper rolling down the road, filled with the pulverized remains of a human and his things.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154922</id>
	<title>Re:Fire fighter survival....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258638960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it's made of kevlar, you can cut it with a sufficiently sharp knife. Stab and slice resistance is the big weakness of kevlar, which is why serious vests made of the stuff still include shock plates made of steel or titanium.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it 's made of kevlar , you can cut it with a sufficiently sharp knife .
Stab and slice resistance is the big weakness of kevlar , which is why serious vests made of the stuff still include shock plates made of steel or titanium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it's made of kevlar, you can cut it with a sufficiently sharp knife.
Stab and slice resistance is the big weakness of kevlar, which is why serious vests made of the stuff still include shock plates made of steel or titanium.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154936</id>
	<title>Re:Kevlar</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1258639140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, besides, real wallpaper has stuff like pictures of Transformers and Thomas the Tank Engine on it. If it doesn't come with pictures like that on it isn't wallpaper!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , besides , real wallpaper has stuff like pictures of Transformers and Thomas the Tank Engine on it .
If it does n't come with pictures like that on it is n't wallpaper !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, besides, real wallpaper has stuff like pictures of Transformers and Thomas the Tank Engine on it.
If it doesn't come with pictures like that on it isn't wallpaper!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155028</id>
	<title>Re:Kevlar</title>
	<author>hattig</author>
	<datestamp>1258639740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>what if this is a load bearing wall?</p></div><p>Without: Building collapses, concertina effect. People are mushy pancakes. Happens quickly.</p><p>With: Building damaged seriously, vastly higher chance of no concertina effect (especially if on both sides of load bearing wall, so it can't flex back the other way, don't bomb blasts have an explosion, then a compression?). People not pancakes, nor sushi-fied from flying debris (windows excepted). Building may still collapse, but may happen a lot slower.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>what if this is a load bearing wall ? Without : Building collapses , concertina effect .
People are mushy pancakes .
Happens quickly.With : Building damaged seriously , vastly higher chance of no concertina effect ( especially if on both sides of load bearing wall , so it ca n't flex back the other way , do n't bomb blasts have an explosion , then a compression ? ) .
People not pancakes , nor sushi-fied from flying debris ( windows excepted ) .
Building may still collapse , but may happen a lot slower .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what if this is a load bearing wall?Without: Building collapses, concertina effect.
People are mushy pancakes.
Happens quickly.With: Building damaged seriously, vastly higher chance of no concertina effect (especially if on both sides of load bearing wall, so it can't flex back the other way, don't bomb blasts have an explosion, then a compression?).
People not pancakes, nor sushi-fied from flying debris (windows excepted).
Building may still collapse, but may happen a lot slower.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153970</id>
	<title>Re:Idle?</title>
	<author>msimm</author>
	<datestamp>1258623420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because idle is a failed concept still looking for a justification.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because idle is a failed concept still looking for a justification .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because idle is a failed concept still looking for a justification.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30159062</id>
	<title>Re:Idle?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258654620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see why people always assume that with a new technology the old rules still apply.  For example, if I were to use titanium steel to build a car, I would not use a typical aluminum design.  The end product would be far too rigid given the properties of titanium steel.  Instead, I would create a new design that requires much less material to design my vehicle, thus maintaining the properties needed in automobiles.</p><p>I think the same applies here.  This stuff might not be useful in "traditional" construction, but surely someone can come up with some new building designs for load-bearing structures that take the addition of this material into account.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see why people always assume that with a new technology the old rules still apply .
For example , if I were to use titanium steel to build a car , I would not use a typical aluminum design .
The end product would be far too rigid given the properties of titanium steel .
Instead , I would create a new design that requires much less material to design my vehicle , thus maintaining the properties needed in automobiles.I think the same applies here .
This stuff might not be useful in " traditional " construction , but surely someone can come up with some new building designs for load-bearing structures that take the addition of this material into account .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see why people always assume that with a new technology the old rules still apply.
For example, if I were to use titanium steel to build a car, I would not use a typical aluminum design.
The end product would be far too rigid given the properties of titanium steel.
Instead, I would create a new design that requires much less material to design my vehicle, thus maintaining the properties needed in automobiles.I think the same applies here.
This stuff might not be useful in "traditional" construction, but surely someone can come up with some new building designs for load-bearing structures that take the addition of this material into account.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154542</id>
	<title>Re:Idle?</title>
	<author>Seriousity</author>
	<datestamp>1258632720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Samzenpus seems to make all of the idle posts, perhaps his submissions are set to idle by default?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Samzenpus seems to make all of the idle posts , perhaps his submissions are set to idle by default ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Samzenpus seems to make all of the idle posts, perhaps his submissions are set to idle by default?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30168096</id>
	<title>High-tech not always needed, just 'Quake Safe'</title>
	<author>Traf-O-Data-Hater</author>
	<datestamp>1258652100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why go for the high-tech solution?
This link describes 'Quake Safe'  which was developed by an engineering graduate <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/tv/newinventors/txt/s1794024.htm" title="abc.net.au">http://www.abc.net.au/tv/newinventors/txt/s1794024.htm</a> [abc.net.au]
shows that simple bamboo and wire wrapping can protect buildings in earthquake zones, a lot of those being in Asia where bamboo is cheap and readily available.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why go for the high-tech solution ?
This link describes 'Quake Safe ' which was developed by an engineering graduate http : //www.abc.net.au/tv/newinventors/txt/s1794024.htm [ abc.net.au ] shows that simple bamboo and wire wrapping can protect buildings in earthquake zones , a lot of those being in Asia where bamboo is cheap and readily available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why go for the high-tech solution?
This link describes 'Quake Safe'  which was developed by an engineering graduate http://www.abc.net.au/tv/newinventors/txt/s1794024.htm [abc.net.au]
shows that simple bamboo and wire wrapping can protect buildings in earthquake zones, a lot of those being in Asia where bamboo is cheap and readily available.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153508</id>
	<title>That's cool!</title>
	<author>TheWizardTim</author>
	<datestamp>1257104040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But will it blend?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But will it blend ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But will it blend?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154084</id>
	<title>If</title>
	<author>lastgoodnickname</author>
	<datestamp>1258625400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it keeps wrecking balls out, then, it can probably keep wrecking balls in. Hmmmmm</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it keeps wrecking balls out , then , it can probably keep wrecking balls in .
Hmmmmm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it keeps wrecking balls out, then, it can probably keep wrecking balls in.
Hmmmmm</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30159272</id>
	<title>Wrong question</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1258655280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure, it's bomb-proof, but what I really want to know is, is it kid-proof? I've got a child that has done several hundred dollars worth of drywall damage just be playing in the house...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , it 's bomb-proof , but what I really want to know is , is it kid-proof ?
I 've got a child that has done several hundred dollars worth of drywall damage just be playing in the house.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, it's bomb-proof, but what I really want to know is, is it kid-proof?
I've got a child that has done several hundred dollars worth of drywall damage just be playing in the house...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154528</id>
	<title>Video is useless</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258632480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While the product certainly has potential, the vids are totally useless. They're throwing a tiny wrecking ball against walls with very little height that support nothing else but their own weight?</p><p>Wouldn't you expect that if the walls were actually supporting more weight, they'd crumble regardless of the X-Flex?</p><p>This might be useful to stop debris fragments and such, but the wall itself will crumble in most cases...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While the product certainly has potential , the vids are totally useless .
They 're throwing a tiny wrecking ball against walls with very little height that support nothing else but their own weight ? Would n't you expect that if the walls were actually supporting more weight , they 'd crumble regardless of the X-Flex ? This might be useful to stop debris fragments and such , but the wall itself will crumble in most cases.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While the product certainly has potential, the vids are totally useless.
They're throwing a tiny wrecking ball against walls with very little height that support nothing else but their own weight?Wouldn't you expect that if the walls were actually supporting more weight, they'd crumble regardless of the X-Flex?This might be useful to stop debris fragments and such, but the wall itself will crumble in most cases...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153774</id>
	<title>Works Like A Charm</title>
	<author>qpawn</author>
	<datestamp>1258663020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The wallpaper doesn't let my video projector display Battlefield Earth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The wallpaper does n't let my video projector display Battlefield Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The wallpaper doesn't let my video projector display Battlefield Earth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154490</id>
	<title>Duck and cover</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258631880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah I said it.  Duck and cover y'all.</p><p>Cause you know that ain't gonna hurt you with yo magic wall.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah I said it .
Duck and cover y'all.Cause you know that ai n't gon na hurt you with yo magic wall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah I said it.
Duck and cover y'all.Cause you know that ain't gonna hurt you with yo magic wall.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30165890</id>
	<title>But the building collapses on top of you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258634220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>duh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>duh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>duh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30180872</id>
	<title>Another use...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258728120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should include this technology in garbage bags.  No more messy floors after something poked through.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should include this technology in garbage bags .
No more messy floors after something poked through .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should include this technology in garbage bags.
No more messy floors after something poked through.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30156954</id>
	<title>Re:Kevlar</title>
	<author>tabrnaker</author>
	<datestamp>1258648380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the whole point is that they can make money from it.<p>A cheaper solution which i'm going to be experimenting with in earthquake prone mexico is building a zero energy home using 18"-24" rammed earth walls doped with lime and placing chicken wire inside both sides of the frame to embed it directly into the wall as it's being constructed.  There's some evidence to suggest such a method will render an earthquake proof wall, though nobody has quite done it in this manner before, and give it a couple of years and no wrecking ball is going to tear it down either.</p><p>Top it off with a self-supporting roof and the most danger you'll be in is from falling books... and that 30' crevasse opening under your feet, but you can't solve everything in a day<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)  </p><p>If i could find a non-leaching easy to construct plastic (easy for an uneducated native as i want all my structures to be buildable by hand) i might try out the concentric rings idea to absorb and deflect seismic waves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the whole point is that they can make money from it.A cheaper solution which i 'm going to be experimenting with in earthquake prone mexico is building a zero energy home using 18 " -24 " rammed earth walls doped with lime and placing chicken wire inside both sides of the frame to embed it directly into the wall as it 's being constructed .
There 's some evidence to suggest such a method will render an earthquake proof wall , though nobody has quite done it in this manner before , and give it a couple of years and no wrecking ball is going to tear it down either.Top it off with a self-supporting roof and the most danger you 'll be in is from falling books... and that 30 ' crevasse opening under your feet , but you ca n't solve everything in a day : ) If i could find a non-leaching easy to construct plastic ( easy for an uneducated native as i want all my structures to be buildable by hand ) i might try out the concentric rings idea to absorb and deflect seismic waves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the whole point is that they can make money from it.A cheaper solution which i'm going to be experimenting with in earthquake prone mexico is building a zero energy home using 18"-24" rammed earth walls doped with lime and placing chicken wire inside both sides of the frame to embed it directly into the wall as it's being constructed.
There's some evidence to suggest such a method will render an earthquake proof wall, though nobody has quite done it in this manner before, and give it a couple of years and no wrecking ball is going to tear it down either.Top it off with a self-supporting roof and the most danger you'll be in is from falling books... and that 30' crevasse opening under your feet, but you can't solve everything in a day :)  If i could find a non-leaching easy to construct plastic (easy for an uneducated native as i want all my structures to be buildable by hand) i might try out the concentric rings idea to absorb and deflect seismic waves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30161458</id>
	<title>i.e. vs e.g.</title>
	<author>amrittuladhar</author>
	<datestamp>1258662180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is as off-topic as you can get, but I can't stand it when people use "i.e." when they actually mean "e.g."--"can stop blunt objects (i.e. a flying 2&#215;4)" makes it sound like a flying 2x4 is the only blunt object the author knows of. Lately, it's felt like a lost battle though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is as off-topic as you can get , but I ca n't stand it when people use " i.e .
" when they actually mean " e.g .
" -- " can stop blunt objects ( i.e .
a flying 2   4 ) " makes it sound like a flying 2x4 is the only blunt object the author knows of .
Lately , it 's felt like a lost battle though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is as off-topic as you can get, but I can't stand it when people use "i.e.
" when they actually mean "e.g.
"--"can stop blunt objects (i.e.
a flying 2×4)" makes it sound like a flying 2x4 is the only blunt object the author knows of.
Lately, it's felt like a lost battle though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30158656</id>
	<title>Re:Kevlar</title>
	<author>Kagato</author>
	<datestamp>1258653300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given it's a fairly loose mesh, it should be much cheaper than Kevlar per Sq. Ft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given it 's a fairly loose mesh , it should be much cheaper than Kevlar per Sq .
Ft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given it's a fairly loose mesh, it should be much cheaper than Kevlar per Sq.
Ft.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30168770</id>
	<title>There are bombs and there are BOMBS!</title>
	<author>Kennita</author>
	<datestamp>1258660200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I saw "Bomb-Proof", I was hoping for radiation and heat shielding.  in the Bay Area, WMDs worry me more than conventional bombs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I saw " Bomb-Proof " , I was hoping for radiation and heat shielding .
in the Bay Area , WMDs worry me more than conventional bombs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I saw "Bomb-Proof", I was hoping for radiation and heat shielding.
in the Bay Area, WMDs worry me more than conventional bombs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153678</id>
	<title>Re:Kevlar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258661520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How bullet proof anything? That stuff could make bullet proof t-shirts possible. Also try replacing all the shell of a car with this instead of the general hard plastics/metal shells they have now. Suddenly the car is 15\% lighter and gets 30\% better milage. Plus who wouldnt want a bulletproof house. That would be sweet</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How bullet proof anything ?
That stuff could make bullet proof t-shirts possible .
Also try replacing all the shell of a car with this instead of the general hard plastics/metal shells they have now .
Suddenly the car is 15 \ % lighter and gets 30 \ % better milage .
Plus who wouldnt want a bulletproof house .
That would be sweet</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How bullet proof anything?
That stuff could make bullet proof t-shirts possible.
Also try replacing all the shell of a car with this instead of the general hard plastics/metal shells they have now.
Suddenly the car is 15\% lighter and gets 30\% better milage.
Plus who wouldnt want a bulletproof house.
That would be sweet</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154840</id>
	<title>Simple</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258637940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>an unstoppable cannon ball hits and unbreakable wall?</p></div><p>You would now have an unbreakable (and possibly unstoppable) wall flying in front of the unstoppable cannon ball.</p><p>You didn't think that one through, did you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>an unstoppable cannon ball hits and unbreakable wall ? You would now have an unbreakable ( and possibly unstoppable ) wall flying in front of the unstoppable cannon ball.You did n't think that one through , did you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>an unstoppable cannon ball hits and unbreakable wall?You would now have an unbreakable (and possibly unstoppable) wall flying in front of the unstoppable cannon ball.You didn't think that one through, did you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155996</id>
	<title>Popsci video</title>
	<author>slaad</author>
	<datestamp>1258645020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There was a writeup on this stuff in this (last?) month's Popular Science. They posted a video of a wrecking ball hitting brick walls with and without it on their website.
<br> <br>
<a href="http://www.popsci.com/bown/2009/video/video-bombproof-wallpaper-vs-wrecking-ball" title="popsci.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.popsci.com/bown/2009/video/video-bombproof-wallpaper-vs-wrecking-ball</a> [popsci.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>There was a writeup on this stuff in this ( last ?
) month 's Popular Science .
They posted a video of a wrecking ball hitting brick walls with and without it on their website .
http : //www.popsci.com/bown/2009/video/video-bombproof-wallpaper-vs-wrecking-ball [ popsci.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was a writeup on this stuff in this (last?
) month's Popular Science.
They posted a video of a wrecking ball hitting brick walls with and without it on their website.
http://www.popsci.com/bown/2009/video/video-bombproof-wallpaper-vs-wrecking-ball [popsci.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30168328</id>
	<title>I don't get it.</title>
	<author>Akir</author>
	<datestamp>1258654620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How does this work better than pictures of half-naked girls already on my desktop?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How does this work better than pictures of half-naked girls already on my desktop ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does this work better than pictures of half-naked girls already on my desktop?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154606</id>
	<title>Re:That's cool!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258633920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think a lot of people are overlooking an obvious question - what about legitimate demolition of buildings with this material? If the owners had put a layer or two on, it seems like it's gonna be pretty hard to take down a building; and if you can destroy the load bearing structures and it collapses, it seems like this could make clean up extremely difficult</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think a lot of people are overlooking an obvious question - what about legitimate demolition of buildings with this material ?
If the owners had put a layer or two on , it seems like it 's gon na be pretty hard to take down a building ; and if you can destroy the load bearing structures and it collapses , it seems like this could make clean up extremely difficult</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think a lot of people are overlooking an obvious question - what about legitimate demolition of buildings with this material?
If the owners had put a layer or two on, it seems like it's gonna be pretty hard to take down a building; and if you can destroy the load bearing structures and it collapses, it seems like this could make clean up extremely difficult</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155778</id>
	<title>Re:Idle?</title>
	<author>Efreet</author>
	<datestamp>1258644120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It might not protect that much against high explosives, but the main danger facing military personel sitting in rooms on bases is mortar or artillery fire.  Those mostly kill through shrapnel which I presume this wallpaper would stop rather effectivly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It might not protect that much against high explosives , but the main danger facing military personel sitting in rooms on bases is mortar or artillery fire .
Those mostly kill through shrapnel which I presume this wallpaper would stop rather effectivly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It might not protect that much against high explosives, but the main danger facing military personel sitting in rooms on bases is mortar or artillery fire.
Those mostly kill through shrapnel which I presume this wallpaper would stop rather effectivly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154234</id>
	<title>Perfect for Dorm Rooms!</title>
	<author>meerling</author>
	<datestamp>1258627800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you've seen the damage the average dorm-rat causes, you'd understand why I say it would be just the thing for the dorms.<br>(Both College and Military)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;P</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 've seen the damage the average dorm-rat causes , you 'd understand why I say it would be just the thing for the dorms .
( Both College and Military ) ; P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you've seen the damage the average dorm-rat causes, you'd understand why I say it would be just the thing for the dorms.
(Both College and Military) ;P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154920</id>
	<title>resolution?</title>
	<author>molecular</author>
	<datestamp>1258638960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope they make a 1600x1200 version.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope they make a 1600x1200 version .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope they make a 1600x1200 version.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30157782</id>
	<title>Re:Idle?</title>
	<author>worip</author>
	<datestamp>1258650720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now combine this with some wire mesh (to form a Faraday-cage when you've papered the whole room (including the ceiling)) and the tinfoil-hat-crowd will go mad for it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now combine this with some wire mesh ( to form a Faraday-cage when you 've papered the whole room ( including the ceiling ) ) and the tinfoil-hat-crowd will go mad for it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now combine this with some wire mesh (to form a Faraday-cage when you've papered the whole room (including the ceiling)) and the tinfoil-hat-crowd will go mad for it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30158494</id>
	<title>Re:Kevlar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258652880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Smaller, thinner bullet- and stab-proof vests for the rest of us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Smaller , thinner bullet- and stab-proof vests for the rest of us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Smaller, thinner bullet- and stab-proof vests for the rest of us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30156290</id>
	<title>Re:Idle?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258646040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously!  This is huge!  The diaper heads have just lost their favorite mode of attack.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously !
This is huge !
The diaper heads have just lost their favorite mode of attack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously!
This is huge!
The diaper heads have just lost their favorite mode of attack.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155050</id>
	<title>Just make the walls out of this material?</title>
	<author>Ogive17</author>
	<datestamp>1258639920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What if you just bypass drywall and bricks and other "skinning" materials and just put a sheet on each side of a wood frame, then insulate it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What if you just bypass drywall and bricks and other " skinning " materials and just put a sheet on each side of a wood frame , then insulate it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if you just bypass drywall and bricks and other "skinning" materials and just put a sheet on each side of a wood frame, then insulate it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153516</id>
	<title>how flexible is it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257104100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i think i need underpants made out of this stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i think i need underpants made out of this stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i think i need underpants made out of this stuff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154970</id>
	<title>Re:Fire fighter survival....</title>
	<author>cycler</author>
	<datestamp>1258639320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to start any flame-wars or anything but I have noticed that walls in the US are \_alot\_ thinner than in Sweden. I guess there is a different tactics in firefighting because I haven't heard anything from my close cousins father-in-law when we have discussed firefighting. (He is a retired fire chief). My point is that with a different tactics this problem might be mitigated. (Given that the lining is fire-proof<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) )</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/C</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to start any flame-wars or anything but I have noticed that walls in the US are \ _alot \ _ thinner than in Sweden .
I guess there is a different tactics in firefighting because I have n't heard anything from my close cousins father-in-law when we have discussed firefighting .
( He is a retired fire chief ) .
My point is that with a different tactics this problem might be mitigated .
( Given that the lining is fire-proof : ) ) /C</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to start any flame-wars or anything but I have noticed that walls in the US are \_alot\_ thinner than in Sweden.
I guess there is a different tactics in firefighting because I haven't heard anything from my close cousins father-in-law when we have discussed firefighting.
(He is a retired fire chief).
My point is that with a different tactics this problem might be mitigated.
(Given that the lining is fire-proof :) ) /C</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30157316</id>
	<title>Re:Fire fighter survival....</title>
	<author>khallow</author>
	<datestamp>1258649340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For a firefighter, I imagine there's a lot of things that are horrible ideas like gasoline stations, refineries, and hazmat (hazardous materials). The question isn't whether it's unusually dangerous for firefighters, but rather does it help more than it hurts. It's noteworthy that this substance is intended for use in situations where injury is likely (eg, explosions, large earthquakes) and people might die as a result of either being impossible to rescue in time or as a result of lethal situations spawned by the use of this substance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For a firefighter , I imagine there 's a lot of things that are horrible ideas like gasoline stations , refineries , and hazmat ( hazardous materials ) .
The question is n't whether it 's unusually dangerous for firefighters , but rather does it help more than it hurts .
It 's noteworthy that this substance is intended for use in situations where injury is likely ( eg , explosions , large earthquakes ) and people might die as a result of either being impossible to rescue in time or as a result of lethal situations spawned by the use of this substance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a firefighter, I imagine there's a lot of things that are horrible ideas like gasoline stations, refineries, and hazmat (hazardous materials).
The question isn't whether it's unusually dangerous for firefighters, but rather does it help more than it hurts.
It's noteworthy that this substance is intended for use in situations where injury is likely (eg, explosions, large earthquakes) and people might die as a result of either being impossible to rescue in time or as a result of lethal situations spawned by the use of this substance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153912</id>
	<title>Oops</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258622700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So how will they, eventually, demolish buildings that have been wallpapered with this stuff?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So how will they , eventually , demolish buildings that have been wallpapered with this stuff ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how will they, eventually, demolish buildings that have been wallpapered with this stuff?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154012</id>
	<title>Oscar Wilde</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258624020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oscar Wilde famously said "My wallpaper and I are fighting a duel to the death. One of us has got to go". I'm thinking this could swing the odds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oscar Wilde famously said " My wallpaper and I are fighting a duel to the death .
One of us has got to go " .
I 'm thinking this could swing the odds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oscar Wilde famously said "My wallpaper and I are fighting a duel to the death.
One of us has got to go".
I'm thinking this could swing the odds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154516</id>
	<title>At last!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258632240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Safety for the fly on the wall.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Safety for the fly on the wall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Safety for the fly on the wall.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154650</id>
	<title>Re:Kevlar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258634580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If we're talking about classical Greeks, I've seen plate, lamellar and even composite, but never mail.  You have a source?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If we 're talking about classical Greeks , I 've seen plate , lamellar and even composite , but never mail .
You have a source ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If we're talking about classical Greeks, I've seen plate, lamellar and even composite, but never mail.
You have a source?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30159254</id>
	<title>I Live By the Beach</title>
	<author>LifesABeach</author>
	<datestamp>1258655220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Living by beach sounds wonderful, until you realize that everything there has a 1/3rd useful utility span; and you get to pay for that too.  So you buy the 50 year shingles, and the Treated Lumber, and Heavier Wiring.  But the question remains.  Can I paint this stuff? Can I work with this stuff?  So what if it can make a Tornado ask, "Please?"; can it withstand the dust, and salt, combined with the moister of the ocean or the dry air of desert breezes?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Living by beach sounds wonderful , until you realize that everything there has a 1/3rd useful utility span ; and you get to pay for that too .
So you buy the 50 year shingles , and the Treated Lumber , and Heavier Wiring .
But the question remains .
Can I paint this stuff ?
Can I work with this stuff ?
So what if it can make a Tornado ask , " Please ?
" ; can it withstand the dust , and salt , combined with the moister of the ocean or the dry air of desert breezes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Living by beach sounds wonderful, until you realize that everything there has a 1/3rd useful utility span; and you get to pay for that too.
So you buy the 50 year shingles, and the Treated Lumber, and Heavier Wiring.
But the question remains.
Can I paint this stuff?
Can I work with this stuff?
So what if it can make a Tornado ask, "Please?
"; can it withstand the dust, and salt, combined with the moister of the ocean or the dry air of desert breezes?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155854</id>
	<title>Re:Idle?</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1258644420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So if the aim is to secure a building, you also put this inside your hollow-core doors, and put it over your windows instead (or inside of) glass. For doors that don't blow off easily, some sort of hinge arrangement in the kevlar seems doable, and you'd just paper right over the windows.</p><p>It'd be useful for areas where deluded folks drive carbombs into buildings, and would stop other larger-than-bullets low-speed projectiles as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So if the aim is to secure a building , you also put this inside your hollow-core doors , and put it over your windows instead ( or inside of ) glass .
For doors that do n't blow off easily , some sort of hinge arrangement in the kevlar seems doable , and you 'd just paper right over the windows.It 'd be useful for areas where deluded folks drive carbombs into buildings , and would stop other larger-than-bullets low-speed projectiles as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if the aim is to secure a building, you also put this inside your hollow-core doors, and put it over your windows instead (or inside of) glass.
For doors that don't blow off easily, some sort of hinge arrangement in the kevlar seems doable, and you'd just paper right over the windows.It'd be useful for areas where deluded folks drive carbombs into buildings, and would stop other larger-than-bullets low-speed projectiles as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154604</id>
	<title>Re:Kevlar</title>
	<author>drsquare</author>
	<datestamp>1258633920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's harder to put bigger bombs in suitcases and under coats.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's harder to put bigger bombs in suitcases and under coats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's harder to put bigger bombs in suitcases and under coats.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155762</id>
	<title>Re:Kevlar</title>
	<author>kungfugleek</author>
	<datestamp>1258644060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> So it's going to be hideously expensive.</p>  </div><p>Well, you know the phrase:  Good, Cheap, Bulletproof.  Pick two.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So it 's going to be hideously expensive .
Well , you know the phrase : Good , Cheap , Bulletproof .
Pick two .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> So it's going to be hideously expensive.
Well, you know the phrase:  Good, Cheap, Bulletproof.
Pick two.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155980</id>
	<title>Stop a wrecking ball, but...</title>
	<author>HikingStick</author>
	<datestamp>1258644960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Will it stand against a house full of toddlers?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it stand against a house full of toddlers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it stand against a house full of toddlers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30168138</id>
	<title>modern non-residential architecture</title>
	<author>Alan R Light</author>
	<datestamp>1258652460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are correct that it wouldn't be much use in an American house.  However keep in mind that modern commercial architecture generally eschews load bearing walls in favor of pylons (reinforced concrete columns, that is) with "curtain walls" of brick or other material.

</p><p>While houses in the USA are still built with 150 year old technology and load-bearing walls, most new public buildings in the USA are not - and thus this sort of protection could be quite useful.  Modern architecture generally eschews load bearing walls in favor of pylons (reinforced concrete columns, that is) with "curtain walls" of brick or other material.  A curtain wall giving way may even be an advantage in relieving some of the pressure from a blast, though how much of an advantage is open to debate.

</p><p>Of course, the protection would only be partial, but I can see how this might be useful in some places.

</p><p>Oversold as "bombproof wallpaper"?  Of course.  Useless?  No.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are correct that it would n't be much use in an American house .
However keep in mind that modern commercial architecture generally eschews load bearing walls in favor of pylons ( reinforced concrete columns , that is ) with " curtain walls " of brick or other material .
While houses in the USA are still built with 150 year old technology and load-bearing walls , most new public buildings in the USA are not - and thus this sort of protection could be quite useful .
Modern architecture generally eschews load bearing walls in favor of pylons ( reinforced concrete columns , that is ) with " curtain walls " of brick or other material .
A curtain wall giving way may even be an advantage in relieving some of the pressure from a blast , though how much of an advantage is open to debate .
Of course , the protection would only be partial , but I can see how this might be useful in some places .
Oversold as " bombproof wallpaper " ?
Of course .
Useless ? No .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are correct that it wouldn't be much use in an American house.
However keep in mind that modern commercial architecture generally eschews load bearing walls in favor of pylons (reinforced concrete columns, that is) with "curtain walls" of brick or other material.
While houses in the USA are still built with 150 year old technology and load-bearing walls, most new public buildings in the USA are not - and thus this sort of protection could be quite useful.
Modern architecture generally eschews load bearing walls in favor of pylons (reinforced concrete columns, that is) with "curtain walls" of brick or other material.
A curtain wall giving way may even be an advantage in relieving some of the pressure from a blast, though how much of an advantage is open to debate.
Of course, the protection would only be partial, but I can see how this might be useful in some places.
Oversold as "bombproof wallpaper"?
Of course.
Useless?  No.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154390</id>
	<title>Re:how flexible is it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258630200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's bomb-proof, not rocket-proof...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's bomb-proof , not rocket-proof.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's bomb-proof, not rocket-proof...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155094</id>
	<title>transparency?</title>
	<author>molecular</author>
	<datestamp>1258640220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it was transparent, maybe it could stop windows from crashing and finally make it a stable operating system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it was transparent , maybe it could stop windows from crashing and finally make it a stable operating system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it was transparent, maybe it could stop windows from crashing and finally make it a stable operating system.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514</id>
	<title>Idle?</title>
	<author>incognito84</author>
	<datestamp>1257104100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is this considered idle? It seems like very promising and useful technology.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this considered idle ?
It seems like very promising and useful technology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this considered idle?
It seems like very promising and useful technology.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30174986</id>
	<title>Re:Fire fighter survival....</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1258747080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If it's made of kevlar, you can cut it with a sufficiently sharp knife.</p></div><p>Or, in this case, a firefighter&rsquo;s axe.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it 's made of kevlar , you can cut it with a sufficiently sharp knife.Or , in this case , a firefighter    s axe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it's made of kevlar, you can cut it with a sufficiently sharp knife.Or, in this case, a firefighter’s axe.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154922</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155000</id>
	<title>Why is this news? It was last months PS or PM...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258639620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lazy reporting around here?</p><p>If Pop Mechanics or Science can report it first.. Just fucking link it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lazy reporting around here ? If Pop Mechanics or Science can report it first.. Just fucking link it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lazy reporting around here?If Pop Mechanics or Science can report it first.. Just fucking link it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154790</id>
	<title>Shrapnel usually isn't blunt...</title>
	<author>bkr1\_2k</author>
	<datestamp>1258637100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds great!  Now they just have to figure out how to make all shrapnel blunt and this stuff will actually be worth the money put into it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds great !
Now they just have to figure out how to make all shrapnel blunt and this stuff will actually be worth the money put into it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds great!
Now they just have to figure out how to make all shrapnel blunt and this stuff will actually be worth the money put into it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154180</id>
	<title>something new for</title>
	<author>stillpixel</author>
	<datestamp>1258626840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>High school chemistry labs?

perhaps Hollywood can find a way to wrap their movies in it? Thank you! I'll be here all week! Try the adolescent bovine!</htmltext>
<tokenext>High school chemistry labs ?
perhaps Hollywood can find a way to wrap their movies in it ?
Thank you !
I 'll be here all week !
Try the adolescent bovine !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>High school chemistry labs?
perhaps Hollywood can find a way to wrap their movies in it?
Thank you!
I'll be here all week!
Try the adolescent bovine!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154034</id>
	<title>Wallpaper adhesive</title>
	<author>petes\_PoV</author>
	<datestamp>1258624680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A chain's only as strong as it's weakest link. So if this stuff is glued to the walls with anything less strong than it is, that adhesive will become the problem: not the bombproof wallpaper. Presumably "wallpaper" is the wrong term, too as this stuff would have to coat the floor and ceiling (and doors &amp; windows) to be completely effective. Then what would you do if you lost your keys? Move house?</htmltext>
<tokenext>A chain 's only as strong as it 's weakest link .
So if this stuff is glued to the walls with anything less strong than it is , that adhesive will become the problem : not the bombproof wallpaper .
Presumably " wallpaper " is the wrong term , too as this stuff would have to coat the floor and ceiling ( and doors &amp; windows ) to be completely effective .
Then what would you do if you lost your keys ?
Move house ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A chain's only as strong as it's weakest link.
So if this stuff is glued to the walls with anything less strong than it is, that adhesive will become the problem: not the bombproof wallpaper.
Presumably "wallpaper" is the wrong term, too as this stuff would have to coat the floor and ceiling (and doors &amp; windows) to be completely effective.
Then what would you do if you lost your keys?
Move house?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153948</id>
	<title>Re:Forget bombs, think hurricanes and tornados!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258623120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From what I've seen on the news (not living in a tornado-prone country and all), major damage can usually be attributed to the fact that houses are made out of ply wood and plastic, i.e. cheap. So I suspect an expensive bomb-proof retrofitting is out of the question or else they could have built a real stone house to begin with.</p><p>I'm looking at 40cm thick stone walls here. That should be fairly effective at stopping a bit of wind. Then again the worst weather condition I've seen around here, were hailstones the size of small grapes, nothing noteworthy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From what I 've seen on the news ( not living in a tornado-prone country and all ) , major damage can usually be attributed to the fact that houses are made out of ply wood and plastic , i.e .
cheap. So I suspect an expensive bomb-proof retrofitting is out of the question or else they could have built a real stone house to begin with.I 'm looking at 40cm thick stone walls here .
That should be fairly effective at stopping a bit of wind .
Then again the worst weather condition I 've seen around here , were hailstones the size of small grapes , nothing noteworthy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From what I've seen on the news (not living in a tornado-prone country and all), major damage can usually be attributed to the fact that houses are made out of ply wood and plastic, i.e.
cheap. So I suspect an expensive bomb-proof retrofitting is out of the question or else they could have built a real stone house to begin with.I'm looking at 40cm thick stone walls here.
That should be fairly effective at stopping a bit of wind.
Then again the worst weather condition I've seen around here, were hailstones the size of small grapes, nothing noteworthy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910</id>
	<title>Re:Idle?</title>
	<author>Garridan</author>
	<datestamp>1258622580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably because it was a nearly content-free "article" that had a short video clip of some shit getting smashed.  Not complaining.  It's a huge improvement for "idle"... but there it is.</p><p>However, I seriously doubt that this material would actually protect a house from much.  The impact from the wrecking ball broke the brick, and the "paper" held it together.  But what happens when you put a roof on, and you set up the bomb?  First, your doors and windows are still just as fragile... and if the impact is as strong as the wrecking ball, the entire front of the house loses structural integrity, and caves in.  Suddenly, the roof doesn't have enough support, so down it comes on your head.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably because it was a nearly content-free " article " that had a short video clip of some shit getting smashed .
Not complaining .
It 's a huge improvement for " idle " ... but there it is.However , I seriously doubt that this material would actually protect a house from much .
The impact from the wrecking ball broke the brick , and the " paper " held it together .
But what happens when you put a roof on , and you set up the bomb ?
First , your doors and windows are still just as fragile... and if the impact is as strong as the wrecking ball , the entire front of the house loses structural integrity , and caves in .
Suddenly , the roof does n't have enough support , so down it comes on your head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably because it was a nearly content-free "article" that had a short video clip of some shit getting smashed.
Not complaining.
It's a huge improvement for "idle"... but there it is.However, I seriously doubt that this material would actually protect a house from much.
The impact from the wrecking ball broke the brick, and the "paper" held it together.
But what happens when you put a roof on, and you set up the bomb?
First, your doors and windows are still just as fragile... and if the impact is as strong as the wrecking ball, the entire front of the house loses structural integrity, and caves in.
Suddenly, the roof doesn't have enough support, so down it comes on your head.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30169028</id>
	<title>Re:how flexible is it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258710300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this wallpaper made of the same material as Bruce Banner's underpants?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this wallpaper made of the same material as Bruce Banner 's underpants ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this wallpaper made of the same material as Bruce Banner's underpants?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154170</id>
	<title>Depends how it's built...</title>
	<author>Bananatree3</author>
	<datestamp>1258626720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Design the building so the roof is supported by only interior walls and so there are multiple load points, and you have a much better chance of it staying up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Design the building so the roof is supported by only interior walls and so there are multiple load points , and you have a much better chance of it staying up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Design the building so the roof is supported by only interior walls and so there are multiple load points, and you have a much better chance of it staying up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153724</id>
	<title>What!</title>
	<author>Korbeau</author>
	<datestamp>1258662180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How can a wallpaper displaying 3 bombs help against anything?</p><p>Is it like the red ribbon, if I use this wallpaper I give money to peace soldiers or something?<br>And is it available in a 1680x1050 resolution?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How can a wallpaper displaying 3 bombs help against anything ? Is it like the red ribbon , if I use this wallpaper I give money to peace soldiers or something ? And is it available in a 1680x1050 resolution ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can a wallpaper displaying 3 bombs help against anything?Is it like the red ribbon, if I use this wallpaper I give money to peace soldiers or something?And is it available in a 1680x1050 resolution?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153760</id>
	<title>Fire fighter survival....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258662780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>As a volunteer firefighter I see this is a horrible idea for being put in use in homes and offices.  Im not sure how easily a firefighter will be able to get through the material.  If a firefighter becomes lost or disoriented in a building during a fire, one tactic they can use is to find out where the nearest window is and if they can get to it easily.  Sometimes they will need to go bust through an interior wall.  With this wallpaper I think it would be near impossible to get through the wall which could lead to unnecessary deaths.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a volunteer firefighter I see this is a horrible idea for being put in use in homes and offices .
Im not sure how easily a firefighter will be able to get through the material .
If a firefighter becomes lost or disoriented in a building during a fire , one tactic they can use is to find out where the nearest window is and if they can get to it easily .
Sometimes they will need to go bust through an interior wall .
With this wallpaper I think it would be near impossible to get through the wall which could lead to unnecessary deaths .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a volunteer firefighter I see this is a horrible idea for being put in use in homes and offices.
Im not sure how easily a firefighter will be able to get through the material.
If a firefighter becomes lost or disoriented in a building during a fire, one tactic they can use is to find out where the nearest window is and if they can get to it easily.
Sometimes they will need to go bust through an interior wall.
With this wallpaper I think it would be near impossible to get through the wall which could lead to unnecessary deaths.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155668</id>
	<title>Re:That's cool!</title>
	<author>jellomizer</author>
	<datestamp>1258643580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well you take the wall paper down before you begin demolition.  Very rairly do they just go and knock down a house without making sure it will go down easy and safely.  Things like Disconnecting electricity, Fuel lines, turn off the plumbing.... Remove any thing that could be harmful to people or equipment.  So I figure they will just take down the wallpaper.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well you take the wall paper down before you begin demolition .
Very rairly do they just go and knock down a house without making sure it will go down easy and safely .
Things like Disconnecting electricity , Fuel lines , turn off the plumbing.... Remove any thing that could be harmful to people or equipment .
So I figure they will just take down the wallpaper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well you take the wall paper down before you begin demolition.
Very rairly do they just go and knock down a house without making sure it will go down easy and safely.
Things like Disconnecting electricity, Fuel lines, turn off the plumbing.... Remove any thing that could be harmful to people or equipment.
So I figure they will just take down the wallpaper.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30183466</id>
	<title>misrepresentation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258808940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Was i the only one to think that desktop wallpapers have advanced in leaps and bounds? Does any one us wallpaper any more?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was i the only one to think that desktop wallpapers have advanced in leaps and bounds ?
Does any one us wallpaper any more ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was i the only one to think that desktop wallpapers have advanced in leaps and bounds?
Does any one us wallpaper any more?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30158698</id>
	<title>Re:Could be useful in Israel</title>
	<author>superyooser</author>
	<datestamp>1258653420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whoa! Welcome back, Zack! Haven't seen you here in a long time.
<br> <br>
I'm glad you haven't had to use your bomb shelter, B"H.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whoa !
Welcome back , Zack !
Have n't seen you here in a long time .
I 'm glad you have n't had to use your bomb shelter , B " H .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whoa!
Welcome back, Zack!
Haven't seen you here in a long time.
I'm glad you haven't had to use your bomb shelter, B"H.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153896</id>
	<title>Bomb PROOF may be over the top...</title>
	<author>osu-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1258622340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think it might be better called "bomb resistant".  Certainly a big enough bomb would go right through it.  They make them into the megaton range these days...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it might be better called " bomb resistant " .
Certainly a big enough bomb would go right through it .
They make them into the megaton range these days.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it might be better called "bomb resistant".
Certainly a big enough bomb would go right through it.
They make them into the megaton range these days...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154940</id>
	<title>Re:That's cool!</title>
	<author>thisnamestoolong</author>
	<datestamp>1258639200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well -- I would guess that they would have to go in and remove the wallpaper beforehand. I am sure the stuff is valuable enough to make it worth the effort.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well -- I would guess that they would have to go in and remove the wallpaper beforehand .
I am sure the stuff is valuable enough to make it worth the effort .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well -- I would guess that they would have to go in and remove the wallpaper beforehand.
I am sure the stuff is valuable enough to make it worth the effort.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154580</id>
	<title>Re:Fire fighter survival....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258633380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe because there's less fire there? Brick or rock is not very flammable, I'd imagine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe because there 's less fire there ?
Brick or rock is not very flammable , I 'd imagine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe because there's less fire there?
Brick or rock is not very flammable, I'd imagine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154626</id>
	<title>Re:Idle?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258634220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A better solution is required.</p><p>I say just build houses with rubber walls, that would solve everything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A better solution is required.I say just build houses with rubber walls , that would solve everything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A better solution is required.I say just build houses with rubber walls, that would solve everything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155070</id>
	<title>Imagine the difficulties redecorating!</title>
	<author>jggimi</author>
	<datestamp>1258640040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And you thought the regular stuff was hard to <b>steam</b> off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And you thought the regular stuff was hard to steam off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And you thought the regular stuff was hard to steam off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154602</id>
	<title>Re:Idle?</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1258633800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Suddenly, the roof doesn't have enough support, so down it comes on your head.</p></div></blockquote><p>Better yet, the armoured wallpaper makes it impossible for rescuers to dig you out, or air to get in.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Suddenly , the roof does n't have enough support , so down it comes on your head.Better yet , the armoured wallpaper makes it impossible for rescuers to dig you out , or air to get in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Suddenly, the roof doesn't have enough support, so down it comes on your head.Better yet, the armoured wallpaper makes it impossible for rescuers to dig you out, or air to get in.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155442</id>
	<title>Re:Kevlar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258642320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People in hurricane and tornado zones might like it.  Sounds like it wouldn't be a bad thing to line a safe room in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People in hurricane and tornado zones might like it .
Sounds like it would n't be a bad thing to line a safe room in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People in hurricane and tornado zones might like it.
Sounds like it wouldn't be a bad thing to line a safe room in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30159390</id>
	<title>Amanda Seyfried/Julianne Moore love scene?  Check!</title>
	<author>Impy the Impiuos Imp</author>
	<datestamp>1258655640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; "...is so effective that a single layer can keep a wrecking ball from smashing through a brick wall, and a double<br>&gt; layer can stop blunt objects (i.e. a flying 2&#215;4) from knocking down drywall. According to its designers, covering an<br>&gt; entire room takes less than an hour."</p><p>"Congress has already had the Capital Building and its offices covered within a few days.  Schools for children in Iraq should be covered within 15 years, according to schedule."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; " ...is so effective that a single layer can keep a wrecking ball from smashing through a brick wall , and a double &gt; layer can stop blunt objects ( i.e .
a flying 2   4 ) from knocking down drywall .
According to its designers , covering an &gt; entire room takes less than an hour .
" " Congress has already had the Capital Building and its offices covered within a few days .
Schools for children in Iraq should be covered within 15 years , according to schedule .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; "...is so effective that a single layer can keep a wrecking ball from smashing through a brick wall, and a double&gt; layer can stop blunt objects (i.e.
a flying 2×4) from knocking down drywall.
According to its designers, covering an&gt; entire room takes less than an hour.
""Congress has already had the Capital Building and its offices covered within a few days.
Schools for children in Iraq should be covered within 15 years, according to schedule.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153558</id>
	<title>Forget bombs, think hurricanes and tornados!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257104580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this can stop projectiles from penetrating the wall, then think about the protection it could offer from tornados and hurricanes. Obviously not a direct hit, since there'd be far more structural damage, but how much of that damage caused by flying debris could be mitigated. At the very least, the protection it could offer for occupants.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this can stop projectiles from penetrating the wall , then think about the protection it could offer from tornados and hurricanes .
Obviously not a direct hit , since there 'd be far more structural damage , but how much of that damage caused by flying debris could be mitigated .
At the very least , the protection it could offer for occupants .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this can stop projectiles from penetrating the wall, then think about the protection it could offer from tornados and hurricanes.
Obviously not a direct hit, since there'd be far more structural damage, but how much of that damage caused by flying debris could be mitigated.
At the very least, the protection it could offer for occupants.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155886</id>
	<title>Re:Kevlar</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1258644480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interesting.  So what was it that the Greeks' and Romans' enemies developed to defeat armour and that people rob liquor stores with?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting .
So what was it that the Greeks ' and Romans ' enemies developed to defeat armour and that people rob liquor stores with ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting.
So what was it that the Greeks' and Romans' enemies developed to defeat armour and that people rob liquor stores with?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153966</id>
	<title>Re:That's cool!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258623360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>STOP SUPPORTING THE MILITARY!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>STOP SUPPORTING THE MILITARY !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>STOP SUPPORTING THE MILITARY!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154742</id>
	<title>I'm not yet convinced</title>
	<author>characterZer0</author>
	<datestamp>1258636320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can it withstand the force of a 3 year old with a pair of scissors, a mushy banana, and a sharpie?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can it withstand the force of a 3 year old with a pair of scissors , a mushy banana , and a sharpie ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can it withstand the force of a 3 year old with a pair of scissors, a mushy banana, and a sharpie?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154382</id>
	<title>What I want to know is...</title>
	<author>dzfoo</author>
	<datestamp>1258630140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I want to know is, if I install this wallpaper in my Windows workstation, would it prevent it from crashing?</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; -dZ.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I want to know is , if I install this wallpaper in my Windows workstation , would it prevent it from crashing ?
        -dZ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I want to know is, if I install this wallpaper in my Windows workstation, would it prevent it from crashing?
        -dZ.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30156140</id>
	<title>Re:Forget bombs, think hurricanes and tornados!</title>
	<author>Tolkien</author>
	<datestamp>1258645500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Houses will still get blown away, but the occupants will only have to worry about the floor dropping out from under them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Houses will still get blown away , but the occupants will only have to worry about the floor dropping out from under them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Houses will still get blown away, but the occupants will only have to worry about the floor dropping out from under them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154328</id>
	<title>Re:Kevlar</title>
	<author>Angostura</author>
	<datestamp>1258629120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> I can't see any practical use.</p></div></blockquote><p>I've ordered some for my 3 year old's bedroom.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't see any practical use.I 've ordered some for my 3 year old 's bedroom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I can't see any practical use.I've ordered some for my 3 year old's bedroom.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548</id>
	<title>Kevlar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257104520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It looks like it's just self-stick Kevlar.  So it's going to be hideously expensive.  However, maybe the Army overpaying for it will help them find advanced production methods to cut costs and benefit us in the long run.  But then what?  Possible uses: line car gas/hydrogen tanks with it.  But aside from that and protecting masonry walls from disintegrating in an explosion, I can't see any practical use.  As a commenter on the article site said, what if this is a load bearing wall?  Looks like it would just fold up and take the building with it.  Great, no shrapnel, I get it.  But as cool a future would be where every building is bomb proof, I don't see it happening before a nanotech alternative that's self-healing and much better at linear support.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like it 's just self-stick Kevlar .
So it 's going to be hideously expensive .
However , maybe the Army overpaying for it will help them find advanced production methods to cut costs and benefit us in the long run .
But then what ?
Possible uses : line car gas/hydrogen tanks with it .
But aside from that and protecting masonry walls from disintegrating in an explosion , I ca n't see any practical use .
As a commenter on the article site said , what if this is a load bearing wall ?
Looks like it would just fold up and take the building with it .
Great , no shrapnel , I get it .
But as cool a future would be where every building is bomb proof , I do n't see it happening before a nanotech alternative that 's self-healing and much better at linear support .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like it's just self-stick Kevlar.
So it's going to be hideously expensive.
However, maybe the Army overpaying for it will help them find advanced production methods to cut costs and benefit us in the long run.
But then what?
Possible uses: line car gas/hydrogen tanks with it.
But aside from that and protecting masonry walls from disintegrating in an explosion, I can't see any practical use.
As a commenter on the article site said, what if this is a load bearing wall?
Looks like it would just fold up and take the building with it.
Great, no shrapnel, I get it.
But as cool a future would be where every building is bomb proof, I don't see it happening before a nanotech alternative that's self-healing and much better at linear support.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154878</id>
	<title>Demonstration  very misleading...</title>
	<author>gooneybird</author>
	<datestamp>1258638480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>That demonstration is very misleading.<br> <br>
Observe that the material is not actually fastened to the wall, rather is is anchored to the top of the wall and the bottom of the wall (look at the piece of angle iron in the demo)<br> <br>
This angle iron also distributes the force across the material, without it, it would just rip out where it was anchored, such as if just screws were used to attach it. I would bet that that piece of angle iron is pretty well tightened...<br> <br>
If it were truly fastened as wallpaper, then it may prevent the wall from shattering, however the wall would still collapse where the material stopped unless anchored (as in the demo). Hence, instead of pieces of a wall falling on you, the entire wall would just fall on you, probably killing you...<br> <br>
And yes, the rest of the structure would still collapse on you as well.<br> <br>
This is probably an advance, however it probably would require new structural building techniques, as well as additional steel anchors/angle iron for it to be truly effective. Not something joe public could ever afford, but I am sure governments could "find" the money.....</htmltext>
<tokenext>That demonstration is very misleading .
Observe that the material is not actually fastened to the wall , rather is is anchored to the top of the wall and the bottom of the wall ( look at the piece of angle iron in the demo ) This angle iron also distributes the force across the material , without it , it would just rip out where it was anchored , such as if just screws were used to attach it .
I would bet that that piece of angle iron is pretty well tightened.. . If it were truly fastened as wallpaper , then it may prevent the wall from shattering , however the wall would still collapse where the material stopped unless anchored ( as in the demo ) .
Hence , instead of pieces of a wall falling on you , the entire wall would just fall on you , probably killing you.. . And yes , the rest of the structure would still collapse on you as well .
This is probably an advance , however it probably would require new structural building techniques , as well as additional steel anchors/angle iron for it to be truly effective .
Not something joe public could ever afford , but I am sure governments could " find " the money.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That demonstration is very misleading.
Observe that the material is not actually fastened to the wall, rather is is anchored to the top of the wall and the bottom of the wall (look at the piece of angle iron in the demo) 
This angle iron also distributes the force across the material, without it, it would just rip out where it was anchored, such as if just screws were used to attach it.
I would bet that that piece of angle iron is pretty well tightened... 
If it were truly fastened as wallpaper, then it may prevent the wall from shattering, however the wall would still collapse where the material stopped unless anchored (as in the demo).
Hence, instead of pieces of a wall falling on you, the entire wall would just fall on you, probably killing you... 
And yes, the rest of the structure would still collapse on you as well.
This is probably an advance, however it probably would require new structural building techniques, as well as additional steel anchors/angle iron for it to be truly effective.
Not something joe public could ever afford, but I am sure governments could "find" the money.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154304</id>
	<title>Re:Kevlar</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1258628760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Possible uses: line car gas/hydrogen tanks with it. But aside from that and protecting masonry walls from disintegrating in an explosion, I can't see any practical use.</p></div><p>Dude, you just listed two very practical uses for it! ^^</p><p>I thing wrapping it around anything that might explode sounds like a good idea.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Possible uses : line car gas/hydrogen tanks with it .
But aside from that and protecting masonry walls from disintegrating in an explosion , I ca n't see any practical use.Dude , you just listed two very practical uses for it !
^ ^ I thing wrapping it around anything that might explode sounds like a good idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Possible uses: line car gas/hydrogen tanks with it.
But aside from that and protecting masonry walls from disintegrating in an explosion, I can't see any practical use.Dude, you just listed two very practical uses for it!
^^I thing wrapping it around anything that might explode sounds like a good idea.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153614</id>
	<title>Re:Kevlar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257105180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But as cool a future would be where every building is bomb proof,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>Then they'll just make bigger bombs. If Greek and Roman armies never used leather and chain mail armor, people would still (?) be robbing liquor stores with bows and arrows.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But as cool a future would be where every building is bomb proof , ...Then they 'll just make bigger bombs .
If Greek and Roman armies never used leather and chain mail armor , people would still ( ?
) be robbing liquor stores with bows and arrows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But as cool a future would be where every building is bomb proof, ...Then they'll just make bigger bombs.
If Greek and Roman armies never used leather and chain mail armor, people would still (?
) be robbing liquor stores with bows and arrows.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155166</id>
	<title>Nope!</title>
	<author>nmg196</author>
	<datestamp>1258640820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>-1, Wrong rather than +3 Insightful I'm afraid.<br>Arrows go straight through body armour and chainmail (which is designed for protection against cuts from light swords). Arrows even go through modern bullet-proof jackets worn by police unless it contains a steel or titanium trauma plate in the middle (extremely rare). An arrow is around 20-60 times heavier than a bullet and usually much sharper. The overall energy of an arrow in flight may be less than that of a bullet but it's a better shape for piercing body armour (sharper) and made of a much harder metal than a traditional lead-based bullet, which tends to flatten or break up on impact with soft materials such as the energy dissipating layers of bullet proof vests.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>-1 , Wrong rather than + 3 Insightful I 'm afraid.Arrows go straight through body armour and chainmail ( which is designed for protection against cuts from light swords ) .
Arrows even go through modern bullet-proof jackets worn by police unless it contains a steel or titanium trauma plate in the middle ( extremely rare ) .
An arrow is around 20-60 times heavier than a bullet and usually much sharper .
The overall energy of an arrow in flight may be less than that of a bullet but it 's a better shape for piercing body armour ( sharper ) and made of a much harder metal than a traditional lead-based bullet , which tends to flatten or break up on impact with soft materials such as the energy dissipating layers of bullet proof vests .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-1, Wrong rather than +3 Insightful I'm afraid.Arrows go straight through body armour and chainmail (which is designed for protection against cuts from light swords).
Arrows even go through modern bullet-proof jackets worn by police unless it contains a steel or titanium trauma plate in the middle (extremely rare).
An arrow is around 20-60 times heavier than a bullet and usually much sharper.
The overall energy of an arrow in flight may be less than that of a bullet but it's a better shape for piercing body armour (sharper) and made of a much harder metal than a traditional lead-based bullet, which tends to flatten or break up on impact with soft materials such as the energy dissipating layers of bullet proof vests.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30160442</id>
	<title>Re:Idle?</title>
	<author>Kamokazi</author>
	<datestamp>1258658880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Useful things in idle give idle the illusion of being useful.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Useful things in idle give idle the illusion of being useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Useful things in idle give idle the illusion of being useful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153672</id>
	<title>Re:Forget bombs, think hurricanes and tornados!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258661400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If this can stop projectiles from penetrating the wall, then think about the protection it could offer from tornados and hurricanes.</p></div><p>This was my first thought (too?).  When in university in the early '90s, the institution I attended had a wind chamber and was investigating the effects of cyclone (southern Pacific - Hurricanes or Typhoons for everyone else) damage.  I remembered being shocked to see that a piece of 2x4 wood travelling at cyclonic speeds could penetrate a brick wall.  If you live in an area prone to these conditions and have seen the effect, you'd be considering the cost of it versus the chance of protecting yourself, your families and hopefully even your house...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this can stop projectiles from penetrating the wall , then think about the protection it could offer from tornados and hurricanes.This was my first thought ( too ? ) .
When in university in the early '90s , the institution I attended had a wind chamber and was investigating the effects of cyclone ( southern Pacific - Hurricanes or Typhoons for everyone else ) damage .
I remembered being shocked to see that a piece of 2x4 wood travelling at cyclonic speeds could penetrate a brick wall .
If you live in an area prone to these conditions and have seen the effect , you 'd be considering the cost of it versus the chance of protecting yourself , your families and hopefully even your house.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this can stop projectiles from penetrating the wall, then think about the protection it could offer from tornados and hurricanes.This was my first thought (too?).
When in university in the early '90s, the institution I attended had a wind chamber and was investigating the effects of cyclone (southern Pacific - Hurricanes or Typhoons for everyone else) damage.
I remembered being shocked to see that a piece of 2x4 wood travelling at cyclonic speeds could penetrate a brick wall.
If you live in an area prone to these conditions and have seen the effect, you'd be considering the cost of it versus the chance of protecting yourself, your families and hopefully even your house...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154162</id>
	<title>Quaint...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258626540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm I always wanted to cover my house in those lovely victorian patterns. Now I can hold tea parties and casually talk about my bomb proof wallpaper... Oh, isn't that lovely? Yes, yes it is indeed, dear.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm I always wanted to cover my house in those lovely victorian patterns .
Now I can hold tea parties and casually talk about my bomb proof wallpaper... Oh , is n't that lovely ?
Yes , yes it is indeed , dear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm I always wanted to cover my house in those lovely victorian patterns.
Now I can hold tea parties and casually talk about my bomb proof wallpaper... Oh, isn't that lovely?
Yes, yes it is indeed, dear.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30158768</id>
	<title>Oklahoma</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1258653660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look at the damage done to buildings in terrorist attacks, the bomb is usually outside and blows the shell of the building in while the structure itself often survives.
</p><p>With the wallpaper, the outside shell would remain together, no shrapnel blasting in or collapsing on people. Outside walls in big buildings rarely carry a structural load.
</p><p>So this isn't meant to keep your house up against an earthquake or something, it really is what it says it is, supposed to stop the wall from collapsing from a bomb blast. NOT to keep it intact as a load bearing structure, but to keep it from doing damage to people inside.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at the damage done to buildings in terrorist attacks , the bomb is usually outside and blows the shell of the building in while the structure itself often survives .
With the wallpaper , the outside shell would remain together , no shrapnel blasting in or collapsing on people .
Outside walls in big buildings rarely carry a structural load .
So this is n't meant to keep your house up against an earthquake or something , it really is what it says it is , supposed to stop the wall from collapsing from a bomb blast .
NOT to keep it intact as a load bearing structure , but to keep it from doing damage to people inside .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at the damage done to buildings in terrorist attacks, the bomb is usually outside and blows the shell of the building in while the structure itself often survives.
With the wallpaper, the outside shell would remain together, no shrapnel blasting in or collapsing on people.
Outside walls in big buildings rarely carry a structural load.
So this isn't meant to keep your house up against an earthquake or something, it really is what it says it is, supposed to stop the wall from collapsing from a bomb blast.
NOT to keep it intact as a load bearing structure, but to keep it from doing damage to people inside.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30161952</id>
	<title>Re:Embed in concrete</title>
	<author>structengineer</author>
	<datestamp>1258663680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nah, that's what the steel rebar is for. Plus, rebar is easier to work around. Externally bonded FRP stuff is good if you want to further beef up your wall. There's a building code under development (ACI 440) for such applications.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nah , that 's what the steel rebar is for .
Plus , rebar is easier to work around .
Externally bonded FRP stuff is good if you want to further beef up your wall .
There 's a building code under development ( ACI 440 ) for such applications .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nah, that's what the steel rebar is for.
Plus, rebar is easier to work around.
Externally bonded FRP stuff is good if you want to further beef up your wall.
There's a building code under development (ACI 440) for such applications.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153800</id>
	<title>Re:Idle?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258663380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree, its very promising. Imagine using this for homes in Tornado Alley<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... it may save many lives!</p><p>PS - a hint to keep America working and in the forefront: do NOT outsource manufacturing of this outside the US!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , its very promising .
Imagine using this for homes in Tornado Alley ... it may save many lives ! PS - a hint to keep America working and in the forefront : do NOT outsource manufacturing of this outside the US ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, its very promising.
Imagine using this for homes in Tornado Alley ... it may save many lives!PS - a hint to keep America working and in the forefront: do NOT outsource manufacturing of this outside the US!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153918</id>
	<title>Re:how flexible is it?</title>
	<author>rvw</author>
	<datestamp>1258622700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>i think i need underpants made out of this stuff.</p></div><p>To keep traffic from coming in or going out?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>i think i need underpants made out of this stuff.To keep traffic from coming in or going out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i think i need underpants made out of this stuff.To keep traffic from coming in or going out?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30159124</id>
	<title>Re:Fire fighter survival....</title>
	<author>Steve Hamlin</author>
	<datestamp>1258654800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So we should purposely build houses with walls so thin that someone can run through them?  How about a little cost-benefit perspective with relative probabilities in mind?
<p>
Why, we should build STRONGER houses to keep cars from busting through the walls - that might happen, too.  It would prevent someone from getting rundown while sitting on the sofa.  You can never be too safe...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So we should purposely build houses with walls so thin that someone can run through them ?
How about a little cost-benefit perspective with relative probabilities in mind ?
Why , we should build STRONGER houses to keep cars from busting through the walls - that might happen , too .
It would prevent someone from getting rundown while sitting on the sofa .
You can never be too safe.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So we should purposely build houses with walls so thin that someone can run through them?
How about a little cost-benefit perspective with relative probabilities in mind?
Why, we should build STRONGER houses to keep cars from busting through the walls - that might happen, too.
It would prevent someone from getting rundown while sitting on the sofa.
You can never be too safe...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30162128</id>
	<title>Bet Arthur Dent wish he had some of this!</title>
	<author>Phucilage</author>
	<datestamp>1258664280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy could have gone completely different with this stuff. Arthur Dent might have just slept through the demolition of his planet, or at least woken up to a large crashing sound, followed by a much larger crashing sound. Or perhaps it would've gone on mostly the same, except the bit about his house would never have happened!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Hitchhiker 's Guide to the Galaxy could have gone completely different with this stuff .
Arthur Dent might have just slept through the demolition of his planet , or at least woken up to a large crashing sound , followed by a much larger crashing sound .
Or perhaps it would 've gone on mostly the same , except the bit about his house would never have happened !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy could have gone completely different with this stuff.
Arthur Dent might have just slept through the demolition of his planet, or at least woken up to a large crashing sound, followed by a much larger crashing sound.
Or perhaps it would've gone on mostly the same, except the bit about his house would never have happened!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153532</id>
	<title>Re:how flexible is it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257104340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If women keep kicking you with their heals right there you may be doin it wrong...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If women keep kicking you with their heals right there you may be doin it wrong.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If women keep kicking you with their heals right there you may be doin it wrong...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154326</id>
	<title>Someone has to ask ...</title>
	<author>daveime</author>
	<datestamp>1258629120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So why don't we just build the walls out of the same material ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So why do n't we just build the walls out of the same material ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So why don't we just build the walls out of the same material ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153708</id>
	<title>Re:Kevlar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258662060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I could see them using it in area's affected by hurricane's, typhon's, and maybe tornados. Seems like it'd be good to protect houses from debris flying at 100+ mph.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I could see them using it in area 's affected by hurricane 's , typhon 's , and maybe tornados .
Seems like it 'd be good to protect houses from debris flying at 100 + mph .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could see them using it in area's affected by hurricane's, typhon's, and maybe tornados.
Seems like it'd be good to protect houses from debris flying at 100+ mph.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153730</id>
	<title>Hurricane alley</title>
	<author>Weaselmancer</author>
	<datestamp>1258662240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This stuff needs to be put in the walls of the homes out in hurricane alley.  Tactical considerations are nice of course, but in your day-to-day those people could probably use it more.  Especially since every so often 2x4s doing 250+ mph are thrown at their homes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This stuff needs to be put in the walls of the homes out in hurricane alley .
Tactical considerations are nice of course , but in your day-to-day those people could probably use it more .
Especially since every so often 2x4s doing 250 + mph are thrown at their homes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This stuff needs to be put in the walls of the homes out in hurricane alley.
Tactical considerations are nice of course, but in your day-to-day those people could probably use it more.
Especially since every so often 2x4s doing 250+ mph are thrown at their homes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154830</id>
	<title>Re:Embed in concrete</title>
	<author>srothroc</author>
	<datestamp>1258637760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I may be wrong, but my inexpert impression was that earthquake-resistant buildings are made to sway/bend and that flexibility, not rigidity is desired in the construction...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I may be wrong , but my inexpert impression was that earthquake-resistant buildings are made to sway/bend and that flexibility , not rigidity is desired in the construction.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I may be wrong, but my inexpert impression was that earthquake-resistant buildings are made to sway/bend and that flexibility, not rigidity is desired in the construction...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30156198</id>
	<title>Fucking dumb asses make some thing useful.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258645740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just give me a Bomb Proof house so i can decorate my walls the way i want... Frankly bombproof Wall paper is like giving someone bullet proof pepto-bismal.</p><p>"Well sir you see the bullet did not enter your stomach; unfortunately everything around it has been severely damaged. But at-least it worked."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just give me a Bomb Proof house so i can decorate my walls the way i want... Frankly bombproof Wall paper is like giving someone bullet proof pepto-bismal .
" Well sir you see the bullet did not enter your stomach ; unfortunately everything around it has been severely damaged .
But at-least it worked .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just give me a Bomb Proof house so i can decorate my walls the way i want... Frankly bombproof Wall paper is like giving someone bullet proof pepto-bismal.
"Well sir you see the bullet did not enter your stomach; unfortunately everything around it has been severely damaged.
But at-least it worked.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155516</id>
	<title>Re:Idle?</title>
	<author>uncledrax</author>
	<datestamp>1258642800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Watch the video.. honestly, I wonder if a couple layers of Tybek or something would do the same thing on the inside.</p><p>The video is very unconvincing as to it's claims.. they just shove a swing-chained cannon ball into a single-layer concrete block and a single-layer brick mini-wall. The strength of block/brick walls lies in it's interlocking members.. something I don't think you can really replicate on a 2'^2 section. Also, especially in the brick case, I don't think I've ever seen just a single-unsupported run of Brick (usually even if it's a skin wall, you'll have some wrap and framing behind it, although older brick construction would be multiple runs of brick).</p><p>The purpose of the wrap is to basically prevent a wall from being penetrated.. although per hte video, it'd still be horribly deformed. So worst case, you wouldn't get killed by the flying 2x4, but as the structure of your load-bearing wall fails, you'd instead have your house clapse on you?</p><p>It might be great stuff.. but um.. the video doesn't prove it. Perhaps a video with some explosions?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Watch the video.. honestly , I wonder if a couple layers of Tybek or something would do the same thing on the inside.The video is very unconvincing as to it 's claims.. they just shove a swing-chained cannon ball into a single-layer concrete block and a single-layer brick mini-wall .
The strength of block/brick walls lies in it 's interlocking members.. something I do n't think you can really replicate on a 2 ' ^ 2 section .
Also , especially in the brick case , I do n't think I 've ever seen just a single-unsupported run of Brick ( usually even if it 's a skin wall , you 'll have some wrap and framing behind it , although older brick construction would be multiple runs of brick ) .The purpose of the wrap is to basically prevent a wall from being penetrated.. although per hte video , it 'd still be horribly deformed .
So worst case , you would n't get killed by the flying 2x4 , but as the structure of your load-bearing wall fails , you 'd instead have your house clapse on you ? It might be great stuff.. but um.. the video does n't prove it .
Perhaps a video with some explosions ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watch the video.. honestly, I wonder if a couple layers of Tybek or something would do the same thing on the inside.The video is very unconvincing as to it's claims.. they just shove a swing-chained cannon ball into a single-layer concrete block and a single-layer brick mini-wall.
The strength of block/brick walls lies in it's interlocking members.. something I don't think you can really replicate on a 2'^2 section.
Also, especially in the brick case, I don't think I've ever seen just a single-unsupported run of Brick (usually even if it's a skin wall, you'll have some wrap and framing behind it, although older brick construction would be multiple runs of brick).The purpose of the wrap is to basically prevent a wall from being penetrated.. although per hte video, it'd still be horribly deformed.
So worst case, you wouldn't get killed by the flying 2x4, but as the structure of your load-bearing wall fails, you'd instead have your house clapse on you?It might be great stuff.. but um.. the video doesn't prove it.
Perhaps a video with some explosions?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154754</id>
	<title>smashlab anyone ?</title>
	<author>tohands</author>
	<datestamp>1258636440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>smashlab anyone ?  that show suck, but we did see something like this in that show 2 years ago.</htmltext>
<tokenext>smashlab anyone ?
that show suck , but we did see something like this in that show 2 years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>smashlab anyone ?
that show suck, but we did see something like this in that show 2 years ago.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30162678</id>
	<title>But could you imagine...</title>
	<author>xtrafe</author>
	<datestamp>1258622940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>a wall made out of it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>a wall made out of it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a wall made out of it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154852</id>
	<title>missing the point</title>
	<author>crmarvin42</author>
	<datestamp>1258638120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the goal is to keep the wall up long enough for you to get out alive, not to maintain the building up to code in the event of a bomb blast or a tornado tossed automobile.  The roof will still fall in, but it may take 5-15 min instead of 5-15 seconds.  I live in Tornado Alley and if I buy a home in this area I'd definitely consider buying this for my home to increase my families chance of escape if a tornado hits our home.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the goal is to keep the wall up long enough for you to get out alive , not to maintain the building up to code in the event of a bomb blast or a tornado tossed automobile .
The roof will still fall in , but it may take 5-15 min instead of 5-15 seconds .
I live in Tornado Alley and if I buy a home in this area I 'd definitely consider buying this for my home to increase my families chance of escape if a tornado hits our home .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the goal is to keep the wall up long enough for you to get out alive, not to maintain the building up to code in the event of a bomb blast or a tornado tossed automobile.
The roof will still fall in, but it may take 5-15 min instead of 5-15 seconds.
I live in Tornado Alley and if I buy a home in this area I'd definitely consider buying this for my home to increase my families chance of escape if a tornado hits our home.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30161668</id>
	<title>Re:Demonstration very misleading...</title>
	<author>structengineer</author>
	<datestamp>1258662840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, there's a lot of testing for this kind of stuff going on in Civil/Structural Engineering right now. It's true that sometimes the bond between materials is the deciding factor for failure. With some of the newest epoxy and proper treatment of the wall beforehand you can avoid those issues, though.

I do note that it says "Kevlar-like" material. I find it odd that that'd use Aramid fibers (what kevlar's made of) in such an application, since they have a moisture absorption problem. Glass Fibers are cheaper, but not as strong. Carbon Fibers would probably be more typical (despite their relatively high cost).

The anchors at the top of the wall simulate a roof tie system. In an actual building, there's a lot that's helping hold it together. A live test of a carbon system (with actual explosion!) is here. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oYm\_bNgBLY" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oYm\_bNgBLY</a> [youtube.com] . No angle iron needed, just proper treatment of the wall and application of the materials. now some of the bond may not be alright after this . . . It may not hold up to multiple blasts. The idea is you take a hit and you get someone out to repair the structure as necessary.

The point is this isn't just a gimmick or misleading. There is actual hard core R&amp;D going on in the development of FRP (Fiber-reinforced polymer) materials as a retrofit or new construction material for exactly this purpose, to increase strength in otherwise weak and/or broken structures. (UCSD used to be pretty big in this arena, they have some crazy testing equipment including a blast test simulator).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , there 's a lot of testing for this kind of stuff going on in Civil/Structural Engineering right now .
It 's true that sometimes the bond between materials is the deciding factor for failure .
With some of the newest epoxy and proper treatment of the wall beforehand you can avoid those issues , though .
I do note that it says " Kevlar-like " material .
I find it odd that that 'd use Aramid fibers ( what kevlar 's made of ) in such an application , since they have a moisture absorption problem .
Glass Fibers are cheaper , but not as strong .
Carbon Fibers would probably be more typical ( despite their relatively high cost ) .
The anchors at the top of the wall simulate a roof tie system .
In an actual building , there 's a lot that 's helping hold it together .
A live test of a carbon system ( with actual explosion !
) is here .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 2oYm \ _bNgBLY [ youtube.com ] .
No angle iron needed , just proper treatment of the wall and application of the materials .
now some of the bond may not be alright after this .
. .
It may not hold up to multiple blasts .
The idea is you take a hit and you get someone out to repair the structure as necessary .
The point is this is n't just a gimmick or misleading .
There is actual hard core R&amp;D going on in the development of FRP ( Fiber-reinforced polymer ) materials as a retrofit or new construction material for exactly this purpose , to increase strength in otherwise weak and/or broken structures .
( UCSD used to be pretty big in this arena , they have some crazy testing equipment including a blast test simulator ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, there's a lot of testing for this kind of stuff going on in Civil/Structural Engineering right now.
It's true that sometimes the bond between materials is the deciding factor for failure.
With some of the newest epoxy and proper treatment of the wall beforehand you can avoid those issues, though.
I do note that it says "Kevlar-like" material.
I find it odd that that'd use Aramid fibers (what kevlar's made of) in such an application, since they have a moisture absorption problem.
Glass Fibers are cheaper, but not as strong.
Carbon Fibers would probably be more typical (despite their relatively high cost).
The anchors at the top of the wall simulate a roof tie system.
In an actual building, there's a lot that's helping hold it together.
A live test of a carbon system (with actual explosion!
) is here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oYm\_bNgBLY [youtube.com] .
No angle iron needed, just proper treatment of the wall and application of the materials.
now some of the bond may not be alright after this .
. .
It may not hold up to multiple blasts.
The idea is you take a hit and you get someone out to repair the structure as necessary.
The point is this isn't just a gimmick or misleading.
There is actual hard core R&amp;D going on in the development of FRP (Fiber-reinforced polymer) materials as a retrofit or new construction material for exactly this purpose, to increase strength in otherwise weak and/or broken structures.
(UCSD used to be pretty big in this arena, they have some crazy testing equipment including a blast test simulator).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154316</id>
	<title>Could be useful in Israel</title>
	<author>Zachary Kessin</author>
	<datestamp>1258629000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Esp in areas like Sderot which has been subjected to years of rocket fire from Gaza. I'm sure making houses more bomb proof would go over quite well. I live in Israel but not in Sderot, we actually have a bomb shelter in our house, but we use it as a storage closet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Esp in areas like Sderot which has been subjected to years of rocket fire from Gaza .
I 'm sure making houses more bomb proof would go over quite well .
I live in Israel but not in Sderot , we actually have a bomb shelter in our house , but we use it as a storage closet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Esp in areas like Sderot which has been subjected to years of rocket fire from Gaza.
I'm sure making houses more bomb proof would go over quite well.
I live in Israel but not in Sderot, we actually have a bomb shelter in our house, but we use it as a storage closet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153920</id>
	<title>Hmmmmm.....</title>
	<author>IHC Navistar</author>
	<datestamp>1258622760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now they can start on that 'Bomb Proof' school desk that my parents hear so much about when they were kids.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now they can start on that 'Bomb Proof ' school desk that my parents hear so much about when they were kids.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now they can start on that 'Bomb Proof' school desk that my parents hear so much about when they were kids.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30156882</id>
	<title>Re:Embed in concrete</title>
	<author>Altreus</author>
	<datestamp>1258648140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You said what I was thinking. But as someone above mentions, it would effectively trap people in if it were not good enough, since the rescue teams wouldn't be able to break it either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You said what I was thinking .
But as someone above mentions , it would effectively trap people in if it were not good enough , since the rescue teams would n't be able to break it either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You said what I was thinking.
But as someone above mentions, it would effectively trap people in if it were not good enough, since the rescue teams wouldn't be able to break it either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153788</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30169028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30159920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30156140
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30168096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30158494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30158768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30158698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30156290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30158656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30174986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30157316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30168138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30159062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30159272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30158192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30156882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153672
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30161952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154304
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30161668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30156954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30160442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30171064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30157782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153708
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30159124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30159122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2343236_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2343236.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2343236.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153532
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30169028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2343236.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30161668
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2343236.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30159124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30158192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30159122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30159920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30157316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153962
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154922
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30174986
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2343236.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30159272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154606
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154940
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155668
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2343236.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30156890
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2343236.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30160442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30156290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30157782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153910
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155778
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30159062
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154602
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30168138
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155854
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154626
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154852
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155032
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155462
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30171064
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30158768
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2343236.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155050
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2343236.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30158698
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2343236.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154840
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2343236.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2343236.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30156140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154562
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2343236.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30156882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30168096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30161952
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2343236.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154034
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2343236.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30156954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153614
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154650
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154604
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155166
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30153708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30158656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30155762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30154304
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2343236.30158494
</commentlist>
</conversation>
