<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_17_1729247</id>
	<title>NASA Attempts To Assuage <em>2012</em> Fears</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1258479780000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>eldavojohn writes <i>"The apocalyptic film <em>2012</em> has dominated the box office, taking in $65 million on opening weekend.  But with all those uninformed eyeballs watching the film, NASA has found itself answering so many common questions that their Ask an Astrobiologist blog offers calming, <a href="http://astrobiology.nasa.gov/ask-an-astrobiologist/intro/nibiru-and-doomsday-2012-questions-and-answers">professional reassurance that there is no planet Nibiru</a>, nor will it collide with Earth (although I do recall <a href="//science.slashdot.org/story/07/03/21/1229247/NASA-Confirms-Solar-Storm-Near-2012">a massive solar storm forecast</a>).  NASA's main site even <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012.html">offers a FAQ answering similar questions</a>.  NPR has more on <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120436493&amp;ps=cprs">NASA scientist David Morrison and his efforts</a> to calm the ensuing public hysteria, but survivalists are already planning for the big one.  Pretty funny, right?  Not according to Morrison: 'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide.  I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves. I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog. When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?" And I don't know how to answer those questions.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>eldavojohn writes " The apocalyptic film 2012 has dominated the box office , taking in $ 65 million on opening weekend .
But with all those uninformed eyeballs watching the film , NASA has found itself answering so many common questions that their Ask an Astrobiologist blog offers calming , professional reassurance that there is no planet Nibiru , nor will it collide with Earth ( although I do recall a massive solar storm forecast ) .
NASA 's main site even offers a FAQ answering similar questions .
NPR has more on NASA scientist David Morrison and his efforts to calm the ensuing public hysteria , but survivalists are already planning for the big one .
Pretty funny , right ?
Not according to Morrison : 'I 've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide .
I 've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves .
I had one last week from a person who said , " I 'm so scared , my only friend is my little dog .
When should I put it to sleep so it wo n't suffer ?
" And I do n't know how to answer those questions .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>eldavojohn writes "The apocalyptic film 2012 has dominated the box office, taking in $65 million on opening weekend.
But with all those uninformed eyeballs watching the film, NASA has found itself answering so many common questions that their Ask an Astrobiologist blog offers calming, professional reassurance that there is no planet Nibiru, nor will it collide with Earth (although I do recall a massive solar storm forecast).
NASA's main site even offers a FAQ answering similar questions.
NPR has more on NASA scientist David Morrison and his efforts to calm the ensuing public hysteria, but survivalists are already planning for the big one.
Pretty funny, right?
Not according to Morrison: 'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide.
I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves.
I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog.
When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?
" And I don't know how to answer those questions.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132346</id>
	<title>Darwin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258487280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyone that believes in 2012 please get out of the gene pool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone that believes in 2012 please get out of the gene pool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone that believes in 2012 please get out of the gene pool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133312</id>
	<title>Re:This is part of NASA's purvey.</title>
	<author>Deanalator</author>
	<datestamp>1258490400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The strange thing is that I watched all the nasa people doing their talk show rounds saying that there is no planet X and it's not going to crash into earth, but the 2012 movie had nothing to do with that.</p><p>*spoiler etc (not sure if you really care)*</p><p>In the 2012 movie, a massive surge in solar flare activity causes some sort of neutrino spike in the core of the earth.  This heats up the core to the point where the crust starts melting.  The crust gets thinner and thinner which increases seismic activity, and eventually, California sinks, Yellowstone erupts, the poles flip, and all the continents rearrange themselves in the course of a 48 hour catastrophic event.  Not quite scientifically sound, but far more realistic than some planet X scenario.</p><p>You know that scene in action movies where people run out of a building as it's exploding, and at the last second they jump in the air as the shockwave of the explosion pushes them out of the way just in time?  Imagine that continuously for an hour and a half.  There is a part where they are flying an airplane trying to escape LA, and a subway train flies out of the broken ground right at them.  If you think of the movie as a comedy, it's much more enjoyable, and just about as epic as snakes on a plane.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The strange thing is that I watched all the nasa people doing their talk show rounds saying that there is no planet X and it 's not going to crash into earth , but the 2012 movie had nothing to do with that .
* spoiler etc ( not sure if you really care ) * In the 2012 movie , a massive surge in solar flare activity causes some sort of neutrino spike in the core of the earth .
This heats up the core to the point where the crust starts melting .
The crust gets thinner and thinner which increases seismic activity , and eventually , California sinks , Yellowstone erupts , the poles flip , and all the continents rearrange themselves in the course of a 48 hour catastrophic event .
Not quite scientifically sound , but far more realistic than some planet X scenario.You know that scene in action movies where people run out of a building as it 's exploding , and at the last second they jump in the air as the shockwave of the explosion pushes them out of the way just in time ?
Imagine that continuously for an hour and a half .
There is a part where they are flying an airplane trying to escape LA , and a subway train flies out of the broken ground right at them .
If you think of the movie as a comedy , it 's much more enjoyable , and just about as epic as snakes on a plane .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The strange thing is that I watched all the nasa people doing their talk show rounds saying that there is no planet X and it's not going to crash into earth, but the 2012 movie had nothing to do with that.
*spoiler etc (not sure if you really care)*In the 2012 movie, a massive surge in solar flare activity causes some sort of neutrino spike in the core of the earth.
This heats up the core to the point where the crust starts melting.
The crust gets thinner and thinner which increases seismic activity, and eventually, California sinks, Yellowstone erupts, the poles flip, and all the continents rearrange themselves in the course of a 48 hour catastrophic event.
Not quite scientifically sound, but far more realistic than some planet X scenario.You know that scene in action movies where people run out of a building as it's exploding, and at the last second they jump in the air as the shockwave of the explosion pushes them out of the way just in time?
Imagine that continuously for an hour and a half.
There is a part where they are flying an airplane trying to escape LA, and a subway train flies out of the broken ground right at them.
If you think of the movie as a comedy, it's much more enjoyable, and just about as epic as snakes on a plane.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132946</id>
	<title>um, ok?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258489260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess you could reply to them that killing yourself and/or your family because you think the world is going to end (and kill everyone) because of a movie is pretty stupid.</p><p>Those kinds of questions make me wonder, based on that kind of logic, why we dont just drop idiots like that off into a lava shute.</p><p>Loh</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess you could reply to them that killing yourself and/or your family because you think the world is going to end ( and kill everyone ) because of a movie is pretty stupid.Those kinds of questions make me wonder , based on that kind of logic , why we dont just drop idiots like that off into a lava shute.Loh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess you could reply to them that killing yourself and/or your family because you think the world is going to end (and kill everyone) because of a movie is pretty stupid.Those kinds of questions make me wonder, based on that kind of logic, why we dont just drop idiots like that off into a lava shute.Loh</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134174</id>
	<title>Re:Oblig Movie Quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258450200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm thinking more in lines of a giant space goat and the "B" ark at this point...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm thinking more in lines of a giant space goat and the " B " ark at this point.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm thinking more in lines of a giant space goat and the "B" ark at this point...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131280</id>
	<title>"when should I kill my children"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258483920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Never.</p><p>Good friggin grief.</p><p>Never.</p><p>Anyone asking this question needs to be kept under watch, that's just sick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never.Good friggin grief.Never.Anyone asking this question needs to be kept under watch , that 's just sick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never.Good friggin grief.Never.Anyone asking this question needs to be kept under watch, that's just sick.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131636</id>
	<title>answer is clear...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258485060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide. I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves. I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog. When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?" And I don't know how to answer those questions.'"

The answer is  "Go for it".

Seriously, gene pool weeding CLEARLY needs to happen.  Make sure they kill their children as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide .
I 've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves .
I had one last week from a person who said , " I 'm so scared , my only friend is my little dog .
When should I put it to sleep so it wo n't suffer ?
" And I do n't know how to answer those questions .
' " The answer is " Go for it " .
Seriously , gene pool weeding CLEARLY needs to happen .
Make sure they kill their children as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide.
I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves.
I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog.
When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?
" And I don't know how to answer those questions.
'"

The answer is  "Go for it".
Seriously, gene pool weeding CLEARLY needs to happen.
Make sure they kill their children as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136730</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1258459380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's a blog post and a FAQ. That's it. No probe to prove there is no planet Nibiru, no expensive mission.</p></div><p>So then NASA doesn't really KNOW that there's no planet Nibiru?  I urge everyone to call your congresscritters and DEMAND that NASA probe with an expensive mission to prove there is no planet Nibiru.  Two missions if you want to feel safe.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a blog post and a FAQ .
That 's it .
No probe to prove there is no planet Nibiru , no expensive mission.So then NASA does n't really KNOW that there 's no planet Nibiru ?
I urge everyone to call your congresscritters and DEMAND that NASA probe with an expensive mission to prove there is no planet Nibiru .
Two missions if you want to feel safe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a blog post and a FAQ.
That's it.
No probe to prove there is no planet Nibiru, no expensive mission.So then NASA doesn't really KNOW that there's no planet Nibiru?
I urge everyone to call your congresscritters and DEMAND that NASA probe with an expensive mission to prove there is no planet Nibiru.
Two missions if you want to feel safe.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133088</id>
	<title>Now, now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258489680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The German Government has apologized for Roland Emmerich on several occasions!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The German Government has apologized for Roland Emmerich on several occasions !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The German Government has apologized for Roland Emmerich on several occasions!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131238</id>
	<title>Let them do it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258483740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let them off themselves. We don't need these fuckwits around when some bastard decides it's time to remake The Secret of Nym  thinking that the rats have gained sentience...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let them off themselves .
We do n't need these fuckwits around when some bastard decides it 's time to remake The Secret of Nym thinking that the rats have gained sentience.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let them off themselves.
We don't need these fuckwits around when some bastard decides it's time to remake The Secret of Nym  thinking that the rats have gained sentience...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131622</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258485060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thats because this movie isn't terrifying anybody, its a marketing campaign. If 20 people are genuinely frightened out of the millions who may see it, big friggin deal. On that scale, 20 people will also be frightened to eat the popcorn, or that they caught pig flu from the guy next to them, or that aliens abducted them the night before. Its noise.</p><p>Its no more earth shattering or scary than Independence Day.</p><p>Some people like to believe movies and books, hence the whole Dan Brown thing. Does it matter? No, lots of stupid people out there. Its a non issue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats because this movie is n't terrifying anybody , its a marketing campaign .
If 20 people are genuinely frightened out of the millions who may see it , big friggin deal .
On that scale , 20 people will also be frightened to eat the popcorn , or that they caught pig flu from the guy next to them , or that aliens abducted them the night before .
Its noise.Its no more earth shattering or scary than Independence Day.Some people like to believe movies and books , hence the whole Dan Brown thing .
Does it matter ?
No , lots of stupid people out there .
Its a non issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats because this movie isn't terrifying anybody, its a marketing campaign.
If 20 people are genuinely frightened out of the millions who may see it, big friggin deal.
On that scale, 20 people will also be frightened to eat the popcorn, or that they caught pig flu from the guy next to them, or that aliens abducted them the night before.
Its noise.Its no more earth shattering or scary than Independence Day.Some people like to believe movies and books, hence the whole Dan Brown thing.
Does it matter?
No, lots of stupid people out there.
Its a non issue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30135668</id>
	<title>Any reasonable person knows 2012 hype</title>
	<author>jweller13</author>
	<datestamp>1258455060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>2012 debunked: <a href="http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4093" title="skeptoid.com" rel="nofollow">http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4093</a> [skeptoid.com]

Any reasonably intellegent person knows that 2012 is just another date with no particular significance.  It may be a very entertaining movie but the date is just, well... another date.</htmltext>
<tokenext>2012 debunked : http : //skeptoid.com/episodes/4093 [ skeptoid.com ] Any reasonably intellegent person knows that 2012 is just another date with no particular significance .
It may be a very entertaining movie but the date is just , well... another date .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2012 debunked: http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4093 [skeptoid.com]

Any reasonably intellegent person knows that 2012 is just another date with no particular significance.
It may be a very entertaining movie but the date is just, well... another date.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131454</id>
	<title>OMG!</title>
	<author>jack\_n\_jill</author>
	<datestamp>1258484460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OMG the calendar on my wall, (ON MY WALL!), ends on December 31 2009!<br>    WE WON'T MAKE IT TO 2012!<p>

Ps; Since you won't need your money any more please send it to me. Hurry; there are only 6 weeks left!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OMG the calendar on my wall , ( ON MY WALL !
) , ends on December 31 2009 !
WE WO N'T MAKE IT TO 2012 !
Ps ; Since you wo n't need your money any more please send it to me .
Hurry ; there are only 6 weeks left !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OMG the calendar on my wall, (ON MY WALL!
), ends on December 31 2009!
WE WON'T MAKE IT TO 2012!
Ps; Since you won't need your money any more please send it to me.
Hurry; there are only 6 weeks left!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134070</id>
	<title>Re:When should I kill myself?</title>
	<author>R2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1258449840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not that people "deserve to die".  The question is whether people deserve to be protected from their own stupidity, or from all of the vagaries that fate has dealt them.  Very few people deserve death, but does that mean we, as a society, should spend whatever resources it takes to keep them from it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not that people " deserve to die " .
The question is whether people deserve to be protected from their own stupidity , or from all of the vagaries that fate has dealt them .
Very few people deserve death , but does that mean we , as a society , should spend whatever resources it takes to keep them from it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not that people "deserve to die".
The question is whether people deserve to be protected from their own stupidity, or from all of the vagaries that fate has dealt them.
Very few people deserve death, but does that mean we, as a society, should spend whatever resources it takes to keep them from it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132078</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132840</id>
	<title>War of the Worlds</title>
	<author>log0n</author>
	<datestamp>1258488960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>all over again!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>all over again !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>all over again!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134576</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258451520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...did they also put in the budget for tiger repelling rocks???</p><p>I dun wanna be ett.  O\_O</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...did they also put in the budget for tiger repelling rocks ? ?
? I dun wan na be ett .
O \ _O</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...did they also put in the budget for tiger repelling rocks??
?I dun wanna be ett.
O\_O</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132610</id>
	<title>Re:2012</title>
	<author>Dragoness Eclectic</author>
	<datestamp>1258488120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I saw the movie this weekend. It was better than I expected. Thanks to the trailer, I went in with very low expectations ("SciFi Channel Original with better special effects, right?"). It actually told a pretty good story, and the special effects eyecandy was <i>AWESOME</i>!</p><p>I was chuckling when I guessed what the story was early on, though, and the rest of the movie confirmed it. They scrubbed off the serial numbers, changed the name, changed the exact cause of the disaster, changed a few details about the escape ships, but the plot is pretty much a re-telling of the classic scifi disaster novel, "When Worlds Collide". As the guy who compared "Dungeons and Dragons" with "Lord of the Rings" noted, it helps to start with a script that doesn't suck.  "When Worlds Collide" doesn't suck; it's a classic story.</p><p>The <i>science</i>, on the other hand, belonged to a SciFi Channel Original Movie, but hey, I expected that. The <i>story</i> was good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw the movie this weekend .
It was better than I expected .
Thanks to the trailer , I went in with very low expectations ( " SciFi Channel Original with better special effects , right ? " ) .
It actually told a pretty good story , and the special effects eyecandy was AWESOME ! I was chuckling when I guessed what the story was early on , though , and the rest of the movie confirmed it .
They scrubbed off the serial numbers , changed the name , changed the exact cause of the disaster , changed a few details about the escape ships , but the plot is pretty much a re-telling of the classic scifi disaster novel , " When Worlds Collide " .
As the guy who compared " Dungeons and Dragons " with " Lord of the Rings " noted , it helps to start with a script that does n't suck .
" When Worlds Collide " does n't suck ; it 's a classic story.The science , on the other hand , belonged to a SciFi Channel Original Movie , but hey , I expected that .
The story was good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw the movie this weekend.
It was better than I expected.
Thanks to the trailer, I went in with very low expectations ("SciFi Channel Original with better special effects, right?").
It actually told a pretty good story, and the special effects eyecandy was AWESOME!I was chuckling when I guessed what the story was early on, though, and the rest of the movie confirmed it.
They scrubbed off the serial numbers, changed the name, changed the exact cause of the disaster, changed a few details about the escape ships, but the plot is pretty much a re-telling of the classic scifi disaster novel, "When Worlds Collide".
As the guy who compared "Dungeons and Dragons" with "Lord of the Rings" noted, it helps to start with a script that doesn't suck.
"When Worlds Collide" doesn't suck; it's a classic story.The science, on the other hand, belonged to a SciFi Channel Original Movie, but hey, I expected that.
The story was good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30145802</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>gfreeman</author>
	<datestamp>1257099960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's not the beeps that get us... we can live with that... it's...</p></div><p>the blinking, beeping, and flashing lights, blinking and beeping and flashing - they're *flashing* and they're *beeping*. I can't stand it anymore! They're *blinking* and *beeping* and *flashing*! Why doesn't somebody pull the plug!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not the beeps that get us... we can live with that... it 's...the blinking , beeping , and flashing lights , blinking and beeping and flashing - they 're * flashing * and they 're * beeping * .
I ca n't stand it anymore !
They 're * blinking * and * beeping * and * flashing * !
Why does n't somebody pull the plug !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not the beeps that get us... we can live with that... it's...the blinking, beeping, and flashing lights, blinking and beeping and flashing - they're *flashing* and they're *beeping*.
I can't stand it anymore!
They're *blinking* and *beeping* and *flashing*!
Why doesn't somebody pull the plug!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131932</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get "It"</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1258485900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Every year I see hundreds of calenders that stop after anywhere from 12 to 18 months and no one gets upset. Why does anyone get upset just because the Mayan calender ends at a certain date?</i></p><p>I don't know where the "Mayas thought the end of the world would come on the date their calendar ended" idea came from, but once created, it's at least semi-plausible and thus unsurprising that it would spread.  I mean many cultures have legends predicting the end of the world (Armageddon, Ragnarok, etc), it's hardly inconceivable that the Mayans had a specific date for theirs.</p><p>Now why anyone would <b>believe</b> that the Mayans had accurately predicted to the day when the world was going to (spontaneously, apparently) come to an end, that boggles my mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every year I see hundreds of calenders that stop after anywhere from 12 to 18 months and no one gets upset .
Why does anyone get upset just because the Mayan calender ends at a certain date ? I do n't know where the " Mayas thought the end of the world would come on the date their calendar ended " idea came from , but once created , it 's at least semi-plausible and thus unsurprising that it would spread .
I mean many cultures have legends predicting the end of the world ( Armageddon , Ragnarok , etc ) , it 's hardly inconceivable that the Mayans had a specific date for theirs.Now why anyone would believe that the Mayans had accurately predicted to the day when the world was going to ( spontaneously , apparently ) come to an end , that boggles my mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every year I see hundreds of calenders that stop after anywhere from 12 to 18 months and no one gets upset.
Why does anyone get upset just because the Mayan calender ends at a certain date?I don't know where the "Mayas thought the end of the world would come on the date their calendar ended" idea came from, but once created, it's at least semi-plausible and thus unsurprising that it would spread.
I mean many cultures have legends predicting the end of the world (Armageddon, Ragnarok, etc), it's hardly inconceivable that the Mayans had a specific date for theirs.Now why anyone would believe that the Mayans had accurately predicted to the day when the world was going to (spontaneously, apparently) come to an end, that boggles my mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132194</id>
	<title>April 3, 2030: 2000th anniversary of crucifixion</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1258486800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The apocalypists will just choose another date for the end of the world then a few more years into the future.  They've been doing this for centuries.
<br> <br>
Astronomers have determined there were two Thursday seders during Pilate's governorship.  This date is the favored one. Then the millennialists can add an even 2000 years to that for the end of the world.
<br> <br>
This will oblivate a massive reprogramming effort to fix the UNIX clock which runs out of bits four years later.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The apocalypists will just choose another date for the end of the world then a few more years into the future .
They 've been doing this for centuries .
Astronomers have determined there were two Thursday seders during Pilate 's governorship .
This date is the favored one .
Then the millennialists can add an even 2000 years to that for the end of the world .
This will oblivate a massive reprogramming effort to fix the UNIX clock which runs out of bits four years later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The apocalypists will just choose another date for the end of the world then a few more years into the future.
They've been doing this for centuries.
Astronomers have determined there were two Thursday seders during Pilate's governorship.
This date is the favored one.
Then the millennialists can add an even 2000 years to that for the end of the world.
This will oblivate a massive reprogramming effort to fix the UNIX clock which runs out of bits four years later.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</id>
	<title>Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258484220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the first film I've worked on that caused actual general panic.  <em>Grudge 2</em> scared people, but it's actually a little gratifying to think that work I did is scaring people even <em>AFTER</em> they walked out of the theater.  At the time we were making it I knew the whole black president/conspiracy thing was definitely going to push a lot of buttons, just considering the way things are right now, but to be honest, the whole scientific backstory of the film is so thin I never actually considered that people would genuinely fear a cataclysm as depicted in the movie.  "Mutating neutrinos"... really?</p><p>ps. I was the lead sound effects editor on the show.  Along with blowing up Yellowstone and other sundry destructions, I personally cut about 80\% of the computer screen beeps.  And I cut every one of them just for you guys, because I know you love them so much<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the first film I 've worked on that caused actual general panic .
Grudge 2 scared people , but it 's actually a little gratifying to think that work I did is scaring people even AFTER they walked out of the theater .
At the time we were making it I knew the whole black president/conspiracy thing was definitely going to push a lot of buttons , just considering the way things are right now , but to be honest , the whole scientific backstory of the film is so thin I never actually considered that people would genuinely fear a cataclysm as depicted in the movie .
" Mutating neutrinos " ... really ? ps. I was the lead sound effects editor on the show .
Along with blowing up Yellowstone and other sundry destructions , I personally cut about 80 \ % of the computer screen beeps .
And I cut every one of them just for you guys , because I know you love them so much : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the first film I've worked on that caused actual general panic.
Grudge 2 scared people, but it's actually a little gratifying to think that work I did is scaring people even AFTER they walked out of the theater.
At the time we were making it I knew the whole black president/conspiracy thing was definitely going to push a lot of buttons, just considering the way things are right now, but to be honest, the whole scientific backstory of the film is so thin I never actually considered that people would genuinely fear a cataclysm as depicted in the movie.
"Mutating neutrinos"... really?ps. I was the lead sound effects editor on the show.
Along with blowing up Yellowstone and other sundry destructions, I personally cut about 80\% of the computer screen beeps.
And I cut every one of them just for you guys, because I know you love them so much :D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131746</id>
	<title>spoiler tag needed</title>
	<author>kalirion</author>
	<datestamp>1258485360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I didn't know the movie was about some planet collision!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't know the movie was about some planet collision !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't know the movie was about some planet collision!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30157458</id>
	<title>Should be encouraging hysteria ...</title>
	<author>RockDoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1258649820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Pretty funny, right? Not according to Morrison: 'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide. I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves.</p></div></blockquote><p>Just Think Of It As Evolution In Action.<br>They die, they take their retarded genes with them as well as the consequences of their no-doubt atrocious schooling and probably their religion. And the downsides are<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... nope, I don't see any, as long as they're hygienic about it. They take their children with them on a one-way trip to decomposition<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... even better. Genes gone, schooling costs down, dumb-fuck ideas gone.<br>We should be building suicide booths with easily-emptied meat lockers to encourage them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty funny , right ?
Not according to Morrison : 'I 've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide .
I 've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves.Just Think Of It As Evolution In Action.They die , they take their retarded genes with them as well as the consequences of their no-doubt atrocious schooling and probably their religion .
And the downsides are .... nope , I do n't see any , as long as they 're hygienic about it .
They take their children with them on a one-way trip to decomposition ... even better .
Genes gone , schooling costs down , dumb-fuck ideas gone.We should be building suicide booths with easily-emptied meat lockers to encourage them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty funny, right?
Not according to Morrison: 'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide.
I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves.Just Think Of It As Evolution In Action.They die, they take their retarded genes with them as well as the consequences of their no-doubt atrocious schooling and probably their religion.
And the downsides are .... nope, I don't see any, as long as they're hygienic about it.
They take their children with them on a one-way trip to decomposition ... even better.
Genes gone, schooling costs down, dumb-fuck ideas gone.We should be building suicide booths with easily-emptied meat lockers to encourage them.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133438</id>
	<title>Re:Why is NASA answering Hollywood Questions?</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1258490880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>have a disclaimer stating that as entertainment</p></div></blockquote><p>NO, IT SHOULDN'T.</p><p>If you can't distinguish between the movie and reality you don't deserve to live.</p><p>This movie isn't playing to tribes in the Amazon with no education.  Its playing in reasonably education areas of the world where there is no excuse for taking this as reality.</p><p>I'd have a problem with taking some people from the jungle who have never seen a tv or motion picture or the like and letting them react to such a movie without making it utterly clear before hand, but thats not whats going on here.  This is no different than people picking up running lawn mowers to trim their hedges and losing their fingers.</p><p>The vast majority of people educated in the 'US education system' know better than to believe this crap, even if they don't know anything about astrophysics or mutating neutrinos.</p><p>STOP TRYING TO PROTECT MORONS FROM THEMSELVES.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>have a disclaimer stating that as entertainmentNO , IT SHOULD N'T.If you ca n't distinguish between the movie and reality you do n't deserve to live.This movie is n't playing to tribes in the Amazon with no education .
Its playing in reasonably education areas of the world where there is no excuse for taking this as reality.I 'd have a problem with taking some people from the jungle who have never seen a tv or motion picture or the like and letting them react to such a movie without making it utterly clear before hand , but thats not whats going on here .
This is no different than people picking up running lawn mowers to trim their hedges and losing their fingers.The vast majority of people educated in the 'US education system ' know better than to believe this crap , even if they do n't know anything about astrophysics or mutating neutrinos.STOP TRYING TO PROTECT MORONS FROM THEMSELVES .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>have a disclaimer stating that as entertainmentNO, IT SHOULDN'T.If you can't distinguish between the movie and reality you don't deserve to live.This movie isn't playing to tribes in the Amazon with no education.
Its playing in reasonably education areas of the world where there is no excuse for taking this as reality.I'd have a problem with taking some people from the jungle who have never seen a tv or motion picture or the like and letting them react to such a movie without making it utterly clear before hand, but thats not whats going on here.
This is no different than people picking up running lawn mowers to trim their hedges and losing their fingers.The vast majority of people educated in the 'US education system' know better than to believe this crap, even if they don't know anything about astrophysics or mutating neutrinos.STOP TRYING TO PROTECT MORONS FROM THEMSELVES.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134896</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder...</title>
	<author>kaellinn18</author>
	<datestamp>1258452540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wish the parent comment could be placed at the top of the page.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish the parent comment could be placed at the top of the page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish the parent comment could be placed at the top of the page.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133740</id>
	<title>Re:Not stupid, just scared - just stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258448760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;How do you tell the difference between the voice of God in your head and just "voices"?</p><p>Because the Baby Jesus told me so himself!</p><p>And the LORD spaketh upon me that all people going to Anonymous Coward mode must confer unto me MONEY that will be spent in HIS great mission!  Can I get a hallelujah!</p><p>Oh, wait, I went AC.  I'm victim of an infinite loop.  Send even more money before God divides by zero and we all end up in a black hole!  Space goats!  Superwhelks!  Just SEND MONEEEEEYYYYyyyyyy....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; How do you tell the difference between the voice of God in your head and just " voices " ? Because the Baby Jesus told me so himself ! And the LORD spaketh upon me that all people going to Anonymous Coward mode must confer unto me MONEY that will be spent in HIS great mission !
Can I get a hallelujah ! Oh , wait , I went AC .
I 'm victim of an infinite loop .
Send even more money before God divides by zero and we all end up in a black hole !
Space goats !
Superwhelks ! Just SEND MONEEEEEYYYYyyyyyy... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;How do you tell the difference between the voice of God in your head and just "voices"?Because the Baby Jesus told me so himself!And the LORD spaketh upon me that all people going to Anonymous Coward mode must confer unto me MONEY that will be spent in HIS great mission!
Can I get a hallelujah!Oh, wait, I went AC.
I'm victim of an infinite loop.
Send even more money before God divides by zero and we all end up in a black hole!
Space goats!
Superwhelks!  Just SEND MONEEEEEYYYYyyyyyy....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30140046</id>
	<title>Re:Not stupid, just scared</title>
	<author>Max Littlemore</author>
	<datestamp>1258482300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Fear makes you irrational. It suppresses the "carefully think about the situation" part of your brain, and supercharges the "fight or flight" part.</p></div></blockquote><p>I remember reading somewhere that a study showed fear suppresses peoples ability to think rationally while anger enhances it which is why I am surprised so many people are reacting in such an irrational way. I guess <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1447230&amp;cid=30131390" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">this</a> [slashdot.org] guy didn't do his job properly.</p><blockquote><div><p>ps. I was the lead sound effects editor on the show. Along with blowing up Yellowstone and other sundry destructions, I personally cut about 80\% of the computer screen beeps. And I cut every one of them just for you guys, because I know you love them so much<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fear makes you irrational .
It suppresses the " carefully think about the situation " part of your brain , and supercharges the " fight or flight " part.I remember reading somewhere that a study showed fear suppresses peoples ability to think rationally while anger enhances it which is why I am surprised so many people are reacting in such an irrational way .
I guess this [ slashdot.org ] guy did n't do his job properly.ps .
I was the lead sound effects editor on the show .
Along with blowing up Yellowstone and other sundry destructions , I personally cut about 80 \ % of the computer screen beeps .
And I cut every one of them just for you guys , because I know you love them so much : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fear makes you irrational.
It suppresses the "carefully think about the situation" part of your brain, and supercharges the "fight or flight" part.I remember reading somewhere that a study showed fear suppresses peoples ability to think rationally while anger enhances it which is why I am surprised so many people are reacting in such an irrational way.
I guess this [slashdot.org] guy didn't do his job properly.ps.
I was the lead sound effects editor on the show.
Along with blowing up Yellowstone and other sundry destructions, I personally cut about 80\% of the computer screen beeps.
And I cut every one of them just for you guys, because I know you love them so much :D
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131878</id>
	<title>All I want to know is...</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1258485780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...how do I <b>make money</b> off these fools?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...how do I make money off these fools ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...how do I make money off these fools?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30144502</id>
	<title>NASA can help</title>
	<author>rubycodez</author>
	<datestamp>1257094620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>send those disturbed people instructions to cut along the veins with their straight razor, not across, for faster bleed out.  great opportunity to put long overdue shot of bleach in the gene pool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>send those disturbed people instructions to cut along the veins with their straight razor , not across , for faster bleed out .
great opportunity to put long overdue shot of bleach in the gene pool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>send those disturbed people instructions to cut along the veins with their straight razor, not across, for faster bleed out.
great opportunity to put long overdue shot of bleach in the gene pool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131358</id>
	<title>Some people are too stupid.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258484160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some people are too stupid. But that is okay -- there's more then enough intelligence left for the rest of us<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some people are too stupid .
But that is okay -- there 's more then enough intelligence left for the rest of us ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some people are too stupid.
But that is okay -- there's more then enough intelligence left for the rest of us ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138350</id>
	<title>Re:Why are you still talking?</title>
	<author>lawpoop</author>
	<datestamp>1258468740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As an aside I have also heard that this Mayan 2012 prediction is all buffoonery. They Mayans thought their the world would end just like we think the world ends after December. It was their calender for keeping track of time. I think it was implied that you just restart the calender once the cycle is over.</p> </div><p>That's not quite true. What's ending is the long count ( IIR the name C ), which is about 11,000 years, and yes, while it is a rollover event like our Dec 31st; <i>unlike</i> our December 31st, the change of the time periods was though to correspond with change in the world and society, in a sort of astrological sort of way. Sort of the way the Earth and society changes between summer and winter. So we are leaving the era of the fourth sun and entering the era of the 5th sun. Some changes are supposed to take places, above and beyond a complete calender rotation.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As an aside I have also heard that this Mayan 2012 prediction is all buffoonery .
They Mayans thought their the world would end just like we think the world ends after December .
It was their calender for keeping track of time .
I think it was implied that you just restart the calender once the cycle is over .
That 's not quite true .
What 's ending is the long count ( IIR the name C ) , which is about 11,000 years , and yes , while it is a rollover event like our Dec 31st ; unlike our December 31st , the change of the time periods was though to correspond with change in the world and society , in a sort of astrological sort of way .
Sort of the way the Earth and society changes between summer and winter .
So we are leaving the era of the fourth sun and entering the era of the 5th sun .
Some changes are supposed to take places , above and beyond a complete calender rotation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an aside I have also heard that this Mayan 2012 prediction is all buffoonery.
They Mayans thought their the world would end just like we think the world ends after December.
It was their calender for keeping track of time.
I think it was implied that you just restart the calender once the cycle is over.
That's not quite true.
What's ending is the long count ( IIR the name C ), which is about 11,000 years, and yes, while it is a rollover event like our Dec 31st; unlike our December 31st, the change of the time periods was though to correspond with change in the world and society, in a sort of astrological sort of way.
Sort of the way the Earth and society changes between summer and winter.
So we are leaving the era of the fourth sun and entering the era of the 5th sun.
Some changes are supposed to take places, above and beyond a complete calender rotation.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133750</id>
	<title>Easy Answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258448820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And I don't know how to answer those questions.</p></div><p>"The 2012 End of the Earth? It's a government conspiracy designed to throw us in a panic and take away our freedoms and undermine our religious beliefs. The TRUE DATE is 2102 -- THE SAME NUMBERS REVERSED! No need to worry<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... YET!"</p><p>The dumbass people will be dead by then. Problem solved</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And I do n't know how to answer those questions .
" The 2012 End of the Earth ?
It 's a government conspiracy designed to throw us in a panic and take away our freedoms and undermine our religious beliefs .
The TRUE DATE is 2102 -- THE SAME NUMBERS REVERSED !
No need to worry .. .
YET ! " The dumbass people will be dead by then .
Problem solved</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I don't know how to answer those questions.
"The 2012 End of the Earth?
It's a government conspiracy designed to throw us in a panic and take away our freedoms and undermine our religious beliefs.
The TRUE DATE is 2102 -- THE SAME NUMBERS REVERSED!
No need to worry ...
YET!"The dumbass people will be dead by then.
Problem solved
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30135602</id>
	<title>this coincides with End Times</title>
	<author>swschrad</author>
	<datestamp>1258454820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in the Christian church calendar.  hey folks, not to prosletyze here or anything, but when the universe comes apart, I'm going to be otherwise engaged, thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in the Christian church calendar .
hey folks , not to prosletyze here or anything , but when the universe comes apart , I 'm going to be otherwise engaged , thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in the Christian church calendar.
hey folks, not to prosletyze here or anything, but when the universe comes apart, I'm going to be otherwise engaged, thanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30135812</id>
	<title>These folks contemplating suicide.</title>
	<author>motherjoe</author>
	<datestamp>1258455540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These folks contemplating suicide. Wonder if this is the same group that believes Obama's birth certificate is a fake or that Glenn Beck is the second coming?</p><p>Wait, if we do have a sudden spike it suicides, that's going to put a dent in Glenn's demographics for sure.</p><p>Take care and use plastic ware....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These folks contemplating suicide .
Wonder if this is the same group that believes Obama 's birth certificate is a fake or that Glenn Beck is the second coming ? Wait , if we do have a sudden spike it suicides , that 's going to put a dent in Glenn 's demographics for sure.Take care and use plastic ware... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These folks contemplating suicide.
Wonder if this is the same group that believes Obama's birth certificate is a fake or that Glenn Beck is the second coming?Wait, if we do have a sudden spike it suicides, that's going to put a dent in Glenn's demographics for sure.Take care and use plastic ware....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132998</id>
	<title>Future Darwin Award Winners</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258489440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And it was foretold: an entire class of people shall earn the Darwin Award in 2012.</p><p>Let's be rid of these people...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And it was foretold : an entire class of people shall earn the Darwin Award in 2012.Let 's be rid of these people.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And it was foretold: an entire class of people shall earn the Darwin Award in 2012.Let's be rid of these people...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131184</id>
	<title>In other news</title>
	<author>syrinx</author>
	<datestamp>1258483620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NASA reports that giant alien spaceships have not in fact destroyed the White House and Empire State Building.</p><p>Reports of time-traveling robots looking for John Connor are unsubstantiated at this time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA reports that giant alien spaceships have not in fact destroyed the White House and Empire State Building.Reports of time-traveling robots looking for John Connor are unsubstantiated at this time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA reports that giant alien spaceships have not in fact destroyed the White House and Empire State Building.Reports of time-traveling robots looking for John Connor are unsubstantiated at this time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132394</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate title</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1258487400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I found this one interesting:</p><p><i>8. If the government knew about Nibiru, wouldn't they keep it a secret to avoid panic? Isn't it the government's job to keep the population at ease?</i></p><p>NASA is part of the US government, but its job is going to space. The "Isn't it the government's job to keep the population at ease" is especially laughable considering "terror threat level yellow, one step below 'scared shitless'"", the TSA, DHS, and having people take their shoes off in airports and other security theater.</p><p><i>There are many objectives of government, but they do not include keeping the population at ease. My experience is that sometimes parts of the government do just the opposite, as in the frequent references to various terrorist threats or warnings about driving accidents on long holiday weekends, which are no more dangerous than any other time.</i></p><p>Actually, this is incorrect. Driving is indeed more dangerous during holidays (which statistics clearly show) for two reasons: there's more traffic during holidays, therefore more traffic accidents, and more drunken drivers per passenger mile than non-holidays. It is indeed prudent to be more cautious driving during these times.</p><p><i>There is a long history of associating bad things with political opponents (older readers will remember the "missile gap" in the 1960 election,</i></p><p>Yet we almost had nuclear armageddon a couple years later with the Cuban Missle Crisis. We came dangerously close to atomic war.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I found this one interesting : 8 .
If the government knew about Nibiru , would n't they keep it a secret to avoid panic ?
Is n't it the government 's job to keep the population at ease ? NASA is part of the US government , but its job is going to space .
The " Is n't it the government 's job to keep the population at ease " is especially laughable considering " terror threat level yellow , one step below 'scared shitless ' " " , the TSA , DHS , and having people take their shoes off in airports and other security theater.There are many objectives of government , but they do not include keeping the population at ease .
My experience is that sometimes parts of the government do just the opposite , as in the frequent references to various terrorist threats or warnings about driving accidents on long holiday weekends , which are no more dangerous than any other time.Actually , this is incorrect .
Driving is indeed more dangerous during holidays ( which statistics clearly show ) for two reasons : there 's more traffic during holidays , therefore more traffic accidents , and more drunken drivers per passenger mile than non-holidays .
It is indeed prudent to be more cautious driving during these times.There is a long history of associating bad things with political opponents ( older readers will remember the " missile gap " in the 1960 election,Yet we almost had nuclear armageddon a couple years later with the Cuban Missle Crisis .
We came dangerously close to atomic war .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I found this one interesting:8.
If the government knew about Nibiru, wouldn't they keep it a secret to avoid panic?
Isn't it the government's job to keep the population at ease?NASA is part of the US government, but its job is going to space.
The "Isn't it the government's job to keep the population at ease" is especially laughable considering "terror threat level yellow, one step below 'scared shitless'"", the TSA, DHS, and having people take their shoes off in airports and other security theater.There are many objectives of government, but they do not include keeping the population at ease.
My experience is that sometimes parts of the government do just the opposite, as in the frequent references to various terrorist threats or warnings about driving accidents on long holiday weekends, which are no more dangerous than any other time.Actually, this is incorrect.
Driving is indeed more dangerous during holidays (which statistics clearly show) for two reasons: there's more traffic during holidays, therefore more traffic accidents, and more drunken drivers per passenger mile than non-holidays.
It is indeed prudent to be more cautious driving during these times.There is a long history of associating bad things with political opponents (older readers will remember the "missile gap" in the 1960 election,Yet we almost had nuclear armageddon a couple years later with the Cuban Missle Crisis.
We came dangerously close to atomic war.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131170</id>
	<title>Wow.</title>
	<author>Overzeetop</author>
	<datestamp>1258483560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just, wow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just , wow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just, wow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131262</id>
	<title>sad sad</title>
	<author>cryoman23</author>
	<datestamp>1258483860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>this is just sad very sad... so now are they going to question if finding nemo really happened?</htmltext>
<tokenext>this is just sad very sad... so now are they going to question if finding nemo really happened ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is just sad very sad... so now are they going to question if finding nemo really happened?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137686</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1258464060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Because taxpayers are contemplating suicide over this 2012 nonsense?"</p><p>Smart people should not try to save stupid people, who are at worst their enemies and at best a burden.<br>Fuck 'em. I'll be giggling like a schoolgirl every time I hear one of these 'tards has self-terminated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Because taxpayers are contemplating suicide over this 2012 nonsense ?
" Smart people should not try to save stupid people , who are at worst their enemies and at best a burden.Fuck 'em .
I 'll be giggling like a schoolgirl every time I hear one of these 'tards has self-terminated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Because taxpayers are contemplating suicide over this 2012 nonsense?
"Smart people should not try to save stupid people, who are at worst their enemies and at best a burden.Fuck 'em.
I'll be giggling like a schoolgirl every time I hear one of these 'tards has self-terminated.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132894</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>jandrese</author>
	<datestamp>1258489080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thank you for your hard work on a movie I have no intention of seeing.  Please in the future try to get a similar job on a movie that makes sense so I can appreciate your work.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you for your hard work on a movie I have no intention of seeing .
Please in the future try to get a similar job on a movie that makes sense so I can appreciate your work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you for your hard work on a movie I have no intention of seeing.
Please in the future try to get a similar job on a movie that makes sense so I can appreciate your work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138476</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>dbIII</author>
	<datestamp>1258469820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Then you get "of course I know it's only a movie, but what if some of it is real?".  Hours pass talking them down.<br>That sort of crap is the reason many lonely people have huge phone bills and their remaining friends either find something else to do while spending hours on the phone listening to insane crap or avoid them.  It even comes from people with functional levels of sanity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Then you get " of course I know it 's only a movie , but what if some of it is real ? " .
Hours pass talking them down.That sort of crap is the reason many lonely people have huge phone bills and their remaining friends either find something else to do while spending hours on the phone listening to insane crap or avoid them .
It even comes from people with functional levels of sanity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then you get "of course I know it's only a movie, but what if some of it is real?".
Hours pass talking them down.That sort of crap is the reason many lonely people have huge phone bills and their remaining friends either find something else to do while spending hours on the phone listening to insane crap or avoid them.
It even comes from people with functional levels of sanity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131998</id>
	<title>gene pool restoration project!</title>
	<author>Simmeh</author>
	<datestamp>1258486140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would go LOL Americans but I'm sure we'll experience the same thing here (UK) as more people see it...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would go LOL Americans but I 'm sure we 'll experience the same thing here ( UK ) as more people see it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would go LOL Americans but I'm sure we'll experience the same thing here (UK) as more people see it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136950</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1258460400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Technically, getting a few million humans in permanent settlements not on Earth could potentially save the human race.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Technically , getting a few million humans in permanent settlements not on Earth could potentially save the human race .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Technically, getting a few million humans in permanent settlements not on Earth could potentially save the human race.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133960</id>
	<title>I saw the movie...sadly</title>
	<author>Archfeld</author>
	<datestamp>1258449480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All I can say STUUUPID, both the movie and anyone taking it even remotely seriously. It was barely entertaining, more like a ready victim for MST3K than anything else. It just goes to show you how naive and gullible the average Joe and/or Jane is. The idea that you have to suspend belief for certain parts of movies is well established but you have to suspend all pretense of sentience and coherent thought to believe this one. I really hope Avatar is better than this...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All I can say STUUUPID , both the movie and anyone taking it even remotely seriously .
It was barely entertaining , more like a ready victim for MST3K than anything else .
It just goes to show you how naive and gullible the average Joe and/or Jane is .
The idea that you have to suspend belief for certain parts of movies is well established but you have to suspend all pretense of sentience and coherent thought to believe this one .
I really hope Avatar is better than this.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All I can say STUUUPID, both the movie and anyone taking it even remotely seriously.
It was barely entertaining, more like a ready victim for MST3K than anything else.
It just goes to show you how naive and gullible the average Joe and/or Jane is.
The idea that you have to suspend belief for certain parts of movies is well established but you have to suspend all pretense of sentience and coherent thought to believe this one.
I really hope Avatar is better than this...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131446</id>
	<title>please, do kill yourself</title>
	<author>spidercoz</author>
	<datestamp>1258484400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>if you think that is an appropriate response to a fucking movie about a half-assed myth, then by all means, do the world a favor</htmltext>
<tokenext>if you think that is an appropriate response to a fucking movie about a half-assed myth , then by all means , do the world a favor</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if you think that is an appropriate response to a fucking movie about a half-assed myth, then by all means, do the world a favor</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133916</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>PinkyGigglebrain</author>
	<datestamp>1258449360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Brilliant!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Brilliant !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brilliant!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30148084</id>
	<title>Re:Not stupid, just scared</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257067140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, good luck to your fearless docile people. You will just kill yourself in accidents, not much different from the guys killed themselves in fear.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , good luck to your fearless docile people .
You will just kill yourself in accidents , not much different from the guys killed themselves in fear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, good luck to your fearless docile people.
You will just kill yourself in accidents, not much different from the guys killed themselves in fear.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133622</id>
	<title>Clean Energy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258448400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If only there was a more efficent way to harvest abundant, clean-burning stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If only there was a more efficent way to harvest abundant , clean-burning stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If only there was a more efficent way to harvest abundant, clean-burning stupid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131970</id>
	<title>And these people vote</title>
	<author>MikeMo</author>
	<datestamp>1258486020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Any wonder why we have so many problems?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any wonder why we have so many problems ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any wonder why we have so many problems?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136970</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>inhuman\_4</author>
	<datestamp>1258460460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly, hasn't NASA learned anything from the War on Terrorism?</p><p>If you want funding frame the problem as a "threat". It's the only thing that the crazies respond to, fear. NASA needs to make the threat of space so bad that they will be falling over each other to pay for it. Of course NASA won't because they are honest, unlike certain other bureaucracies.</p><p>Instead of going to the moon to look for water, they should be going to the moon to build radars to protect America (not the world because thats the UN's job) from giant space rocks of death!</p><p>Then you give a whole bunch of interviews on FOX about "Operation Space Blasters", and how NASA is protecting Averages Joe's right to not have his house bombed out by renegade space rocks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly , has n't NASA learned anything from the War on Terrorism ? If you want funding frame the problem as a " threat " .
It 's the only thing that the crazies respond to , fear .
NASA needs to make the threat of space so bad that they will be falling over each other to pay for it .
Of course NASA wo n't because they are honest , unlike certain other bureaucracies.Instead of going to the moon to look for water , they should be going to the moon to build radars to protect America ( not the world because thats the UN 's job ) from giant space rocks of death ! Then you give a whole bunch of interviews on FOX about " Operation Space Blasters " , and how NASA is protecting Averages Joe 's right to not have his house bombed out by renegade space rocks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly, hasn't NASA learned anything from the War on Terrorism?If you want funding frame the problem as a "threat".
It's the only thing that the crazies respond to, fear.
NASA needs to make the threat of space so bad that they will be falling over each other to pay for it.
Of course NASA won't because they are honest, unlike certain other bureaucracies.Instead of going to the moon to look for water, they should be going to the moon to build radars to protect America (not the world because thats the UN's job) from giant space rocks of death!Then you give a whole bunch of interviews on FOX about "Operation Space Blasters", and how NASA is protecting Averages Joe's right to not have his house bombed out by renegade space rocks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132186</id>
	<title>there ought to be a law</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258486800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>against being stupid enough to confuse a movie with reality. If a person is that dumb, they should not be allowed to watch movies or TV.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>against being stupid enough to confuse a movie with reality .
If a person is that dumb , they should not be allowed to watch movies or TV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>against being stupid enough to confuse a movie with reality.
If a person is that dumb, they should not be allowed to watch movies or TV.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131770</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1258485480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense?</p></div></blockquote><p>Science education <i>is</i> one of NASA's missions after all.  Education seems like a fine use of my money.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is the taxpayer 's money being spent on this nonsense ? Science education is one of NASA 's missions after all .
Education seems like a fine use of my money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense?Science education is one of NASA's missions after all.
Education seems like a fine use of my money.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30140604</id>
	<title>Re:In other news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258487880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they aren't looking for John Conner, maybe that means they can spell. But they should try looking for John Bowm instead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they are n't looking for John Conner , maybe that means they can spell .
But they should try looking for John Bowm instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they aren't looking for John Conner, maybe that means they can spell.
But they should try looking for John Bowm instead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132028</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>LifesABeach</author>
	<datestamp>1258486260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was going to blow the film off as a Y2K 2.0 type film.  Now I'll wait till it gets to the $3.00 ticket movie theater.  Break a Leg.  Just as a foot note, the Mayan's equate the end of their calendar as like December 31st.  The calendar just starts over.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was going to blow the film off as a Y2K 2.0 type film .
Now I 'll wait till it gets to the $ 3.00 ticket movie theater .
Break a Leg .
Just as a foot note , the Mayan 's equate the end of their calendar as like December 31st .
The calendar just starts over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was going to blow the film off as a Y2K 2.0 type film.
Now I'll wait till it gets to the $3.00 ticket movie theater.
Break a Leg.
Just as a foot note, the Mayan's equate the end of their calendar as like December 31st.
The calendar just starts over.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131794</id>
	<title>I get this sometimes.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258485540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I got these sorts of questions and comments during the Y2K hoopla and I've gotten some of it with this whole 2012 thing. Actually been getting questions about it since around 2004. About all I can do is point out to them that it's silly fiction and ignorance and suggest they get on with their lives.</p><p>The sad truth is, a lot of people want the world to end; they have death wishes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got these sorts of questions and comments during the Y2K hoopla and I 've gotten some of it with this whole 2012 thing .
Actually been getting questions about it since around 2004 .
About all I can do is point out to them that it 's silly fiction and ignorance and suggest they get on with their lives.The sad truth is , a lot of people want the world to end ; they have death wishes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got these sorts of questions and comments during the Y2K hoopla and I've gotten some of it with this whole 2012 thing.
Actually been getting questions about it since around 2004.
About all I can do is point out to them that it's silly fiction and ignorance and suggest they get on with their lives.The sad truth is, a lot of people want the world to end; they have death wishes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131936</id>
	<title>Most people are stupid, news at 11</title>
	<author>fuzzylollipop</author>
	<datestamp>1258485960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If people don't understand science then everything scientific becomes mystical.
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=\_c6HsiixFS8" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=\_c6HsiixFS8</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>If people do n't understand science then everything scientific becomes mystical .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = \ _c6HsiixFS8 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If people don't understand science then everything scientific becomes mystical.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=\_c6HsiixFS8 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30135188</id>
	<title>Re:How Histery Repeats ....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258453500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>actually they announced that it was fake during the show too.  My grandfather told me about it 50 years later and he was still in disbelief how dumb people were.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>actually they announced that it was fake during the show too .
My grandfather told me about it 50 years later and he was still in disbelief how dumb people were .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>actually they announced that it was fake during the show too.
My grandfather told me about it 50 years later and he was still in disbelief how dumb people were.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132024</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>Staniel</author>
	<datestamp>1258486260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Link them to <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/26/1517242/2012-a-Miscalculation-Actual-Calendar-Ends-2220" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">this<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. article</a> [slashdot.org].
<p>
This kind of thing is pretty terrifying to me and it serves as a reminder of how desperately we need good, free, public education.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Link them to this / .
article [ slashdot.org ] .
This kind of thing is pretty terrifying to me and it serves as a reminder of how desperately we need good , free , public education .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Link them to this /.
article [slashdot.org].
This kind of thing is pretty terrifying to me and it serves as a reminder of how desperately we need good, free, public education.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134114</id>
	<title>What's more scary?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258450020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know what is more scary, that people think a Hollywood movie is real or that these same people can also vote.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know what is more scary , that people think a Hollywood movie is real or that these same people can also vote .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know what is more scary, that people think a Hollywood movie is real or that these same people can also vote.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131210</id>
	<title>Morons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258483680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess it's best for everyone if they kill themselves...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess it 's best for everyone if they kill themselves.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess it's best for everyone if they kill themselves...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132442</id>
	<title>Re:Some people are too stupid.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258487580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, why don't you help yourself to some, since there's more 'then' enough?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , why do n't you help yourself to some , since there 's more 'then ' enough ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, why don't you help yourself to some, since there's more 'then' enough?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131358</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131290</id>
	<title>Here's your sign!!</title>
	<author>arizwebfoot</author>
	<datestamp>1258483980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now where <b>is</b> that tin hat?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now where is that tin hat ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now where is that tin hat?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133832</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1258449060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>No NASA should respond with "Yes it's real and we need $1 trillion in funding to determine how to stop it" and then spend that on real research.</i></p><p>Yes, because doomsday losers with no comprehension of what real science or reality is tend to be rolling in money.</p><p>I'm with GP. Just tell them it's a fucking movie and not to be so naive and get on with your day. If you're worried they don't believe you and are concerned about the potential for a child being murdered due to the dillusion call child services or the police. Then get on with your real work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No NASA should respond with " Yes it 's real and we need $ 1 trillion in funding to determine how to stop it " and then spend that on real research.Yes , because doomsday losers with no comprehension of what real science or reality is tend to be rolling in money.I 'm with GP .
Just tell them it 's a fucking movie and not to be so naive and get on with your day .
If you 're worried they do n't believe you and are concerned about the potential for a child being murdered due to the dillusion call child services or the police .
Then get on with your real work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No NASA should respond with "Yes it's real and we need $1 trillion in funding to determine how to stop it" and then spend that on real research.Yes, because doomsday losers with no comprehension of what real science or reality is tend to be rolling in money.I'm with GP.
Just tell them it's a fucking movie and not to be so naive and get on with your day.
If you're worried they don't believe you and are concerned about the potential for a child being murdered due to the dillusion call child services or the police.
Then get on with your real work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131248</id>
	<title>Lemmings!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258483800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why must the pulse of social consciousness behave like that of lemmings?</p><p>Thought experiment: if the 'Mayan, ancient, or whatever' calendars that the 2012 'disaster' scenario reference were lost many moons ago, would all this F.U.D. still exist?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/"<i>Been around the world and found that only stupid people are breeding...</i>"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why must the pulse of social consciousness behave like that of lemmings ? Thought experiment : if the 'Mayan , ancient , or whatever ' calendars that the 2012 'disaster ' scenario reference were lost many moons ago , would all this F.U.D .
still exist ?
/ " Been around the world and found that only stupid people are breeding... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why must the pulse of social consciousness behave like that of lemmings?Thought experiment: if the 'Mayan, ancient, or whatever' calendars that the 2012 'disaster' scenario reference were lost many moons ago, would all this F.U.D.
still exist?
/"Been around the world and found that only stupid people are breeding..."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132366</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1258487340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is your boss paying you to post on Slashdot? Why are you posting here?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is your boss paying you to post on Slashdot ?
Why are you posting here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is your boss paying you to post on Slashdot?
Why are you posting here?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131450</id>
	<title>Oblig Movie Quote</title>
	<author>Croakus</author>
	<datestamp>1258484400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's always an Arquillian Battle Cruiser, or a Corillian Death Ray, or an intergalactic plague that is about to wipe out all life on this miserable little planet, and the only way these people can get on with their happy lives is that they Do... Not... Know about it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's always an Arquillian Battle Cruiser , or a Corillian Death Ray , or an intergalactic plague that is about to wipe out all life on this miserable little planet , and the only way these people can get on with their happy lives is that they Do... Not... Know about it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's always an Arquillian Battle Cruiser, or a Corillian Death Ray, or an intergalactic plague that is about to wipe out all life on this miserable little planet, and the only way these people can get on with their happy lives is that they Do... Not... Know about it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133000</id>
	<title>Re:Not stupid, just scared</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1258489500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> We live in a constant state of fear</p></div><p>Do you?  If so, you should probably seek help, rather than using it as a justification for stupid behaviour.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We live in a constant state of fearDo you ?
If so , you should probably seek help , rather than using it as a justification for stupid behaviour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> We live in a constant state of fearDo you?
If so, you should probably seek help, rather than using it as a justification for stupid behaviour.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30135438</id>
	<title>Re:This is part of NASA's purvey.</title>
	<author>adamchou</author>
	<datestamp>1258454340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ignorance is the lack of knowledge. The inability to differentiate between hollywood fiction and reality isn't a lack of knowledge. Thats just plain stupidity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ignorance is the lack of knowledge .
The inability to differentiate between hollywood fiction and reality is n't a lack of knowledge .
Thats just plain stupidity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ignorance is the lack of knowledge.
The inability to differentiate between hollywood fiction and reality isn't a lack of knowledge.
Thats just plain stupidity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136458</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>anegg</author>
	<datestamp>1258458300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting that you bring those sounds up.  The DEC VT52 video terminal actually made sounds like a teletype when characters were being displayed on the screen.  I always assumed the sound effect was to help folks with the transition from the ASR33s and such to the wonderful world of video terminals.  Modern computers don't have the ability anymore, sadly enough.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting that you bring those sounds up .
The DEC VT52 video terminal actually made sounds like a teletype when characters were being displayed on the screen .
I always assumed the sound effect was to help folks with the transition from the ASR33s and such to the wonderful world of video terminals .
Modern computers do n't have the ability anymore , sadly enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting that you bring those sounds up.
The DEC VT52 video terminal actually made sounds like a teletype when characters were being displayed on the screen.
I always assumed the sound effect was to help folks with the transition from the ASR33s and such to the wonderful world of video terminals.
Modern computers don't have the ability anymore, sadly enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132138</id>
	<title>from a other side</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258486560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's really weird that NASA is responding to a 2012 movement....but from the other side maybe just maybe...there is something more to that then just a movie<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's really weird that NASA is responding to a 2012 movement....but from the other side maybe just maybe...there is something more to that then just a movie : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's really weird that NASA is responding to a 2012 movement....but from the other side maybe just maybe...there is something more to that then just a movie :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131656</id>
	<title>Re:How Histery Repeats ....</title>
	<author>Qzukk</author>
	<datestamp>1258485120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the case of The War of the Worlds, the radio broadcast WAS designed to sound "real", complete with interrupting musical programs for special announcements and so on.  Someone who tuned in in the middle of the show would have missed the announcement that it was just a radio program, and it predated the transistor radio by a decade so most of the people who decided to flee or whatever wouldn't have had a way to keep up with the program and hear any other announcements that they were listening to a fictional story.</p><p>There's no excuse at all for 2012.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the case of The War of the Worlds , the radio broadcast WAS designed to sound " real " , complete with interrupting musical programs for special announcements and so on .
Someone who tuned in in the middle of the show would have missed the announcement that it was just a radio program , and it predated the transistor radio by a decade so most of the people who decided to flee or whatever would n't have had a way to keep up with the program and hear any other announcements that they were listening to a fictional story.There 's no excuse at all for 2012 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the case of The War of the Worlds, the radio broadcast WAS designed to sound "real", complete with interrupting musical programs for special announcements and so on.
Someone who tuned in in the middle of the show would have missed the announcement that it was just a radio program, and it predated the transistor radio by a decade so most of the people who decided to flee or whatever wouldn't have had a way to keep up with the program and hear any other announcements that they were listening to a fictional story.There's no excuse at all for 2012.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134960</id>
	<title>Stupid ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258452780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stupid ?</p><p>Does this remind of some other induced hysteria that is leading millions of people to get inoculated with a barely tested vaccine?</p><p>Nothing to see here, move along.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stupid ? Does this remind of some other induced hysteria that is leading millions of people to get inoculated with a barely tested vaccine ? Nothing to see here , move along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stupid ?Does this remind of some other induced hysteria that is leading millions of people to get inoculated with a barely tested vaccine?Nothing to see here, move along.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132306</id>
	<title>Re:Not stupid, just scared - just stupid</title>
	<author>Fantastic Lad</author>
	<datestamp>1258487100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The above poster "If we remove the irrational fears" that would include any form of God.</i></p><p>Religion is sold to people in much the same way as any state-driven fear; it just looks slightly different and so it gets categorized in a different box.  But that box is in the same basement.</p><p>This is why television is best avoided.  It's not the adverts which get you; it's the implied reality behind the statements, and the endless flicker, flicker, flicker just on the edge of our awareness, lulling us into mass hypnosis.  Most people I know who champion so-called "science" over religion are victims of that hypnosis.  They wouldn't recognize real critical thinking if they tripped over it, but they truly <i>believe</i> they are critical thinkers.  And THAT is how the dream of the matrix works to control people.</p><p>-FL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The above poster " If we remove the irrational fears " that would include any form of God.Religion is sold to people in much the same way as any state-driven fear ; it just looks slightly different and so it gets categorized in a different box .
But that box is in the same basement.This is why television is best avoided .
It 's not the adverts which get you ; it 's the implied reality behind the statements , and the endless flicker , flicker , flicker just on the edge of our awareness , lulling us into mass hypnosis .
Most people I know who champion so-called " science " over religion are victims of that hypnosis .
They would n't recognize real critical thinking if they tripped over it , but they truly believe they are critical thinkers .
And THAT is how the dream of the matrix works to control people.-FL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The above poster "If we remove the irrational fears" that would include any form of God.Religion is sold to people in much the same way as any state-driven fear; it just looks slightly different and so it gets categorized in a different box.
But that box is in the same basement.This is why television is best avoided.
It's not the adverts which get you; it's the implied reality behind the statements, and the endless flicker, flicker, flicker just on the edge of our awareness, lulling us into mass hypnosis.
Most people I know who champion so-called "science" over religion are victims of that hypnosis.
They wouldn't recognize real critical thinking if they tripped over it, but they truly believe they are critical thinkers.
And THAT is how the dream of the matrix works to control people.-FL</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134090</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong year</title>
	<author>prefec2</author>
	<datestamp>1258449960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought the end is 2038.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the end is 2038 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the end is 2038.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133344</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>dtml-try MyNick</author>
	<datestamp>1258490520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great idea!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p><p>Except change "NASA" to "CHINA" in that case.</p><p>Give the Chinese one trillion dollars for space research and we'll all have a second house on Mars in a few years (mortgage to be paid in Yen btw)</p><p>Giving NASA a trillion dollars is the same as burning it or dumping it in a bottomless pit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great idea !
: - ) Except change " NASA " to " CHINA " in that case.Give the Chinese one trillion dollars for space research and we 'll all have a second house on Mars in a few years ( mortgage to be paid in Yen btw ) Giving NASA a trillion dollars is the same as burning it or dumping it in a bottomless pit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great idea!
:-)Except change "NASA" to "CHINA" in that case.Give the Chinese one trillion dollars for space research and we'll all have a second house on Mars in a few years (mortgage to be paid in Yen btw)Giving NASA a trillion dollars is the same as burning it or dumping it in a bottomless pit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132190</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>dpilot</author>
	<datestamp>1258486800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, the world is going to end in 2012, we're all going to die.<br>It's time to be concerned about your immortal soul, and I can help you with that, for a small fee.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... (Don't even need to leave out any mystery steps here)<br>PROFIT!!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... (Vanish before Dec 23, 2012)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , the world is going to end in 2012 , we 're all going to die.It 's time to be concerned about your immortal soul , and I can help you with that , for a small fee .
... ( Do n't even need to leave out any mystery steps here ) PROFIT ! !
... ( Vanish before Dec 23 , 2012 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, the world is going to end in 2012, we're all going to die.It's time to be concerned about your immortal soul, and I can help you with that, for a small fee.
... (Don't even need to leave out any mystery steps here)PROFIT!!
... (Vanish before Dec 23, 2012)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131428</id>
	<title>Remember The War of The Worlds?</title>
	<author>Enleth</author>
	<datestamp>1258484340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean, the <a href="http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/orsonwellswaroftheworlds.htm" title="americanrhetoric.com">original radio broadcast</a> [americanrhetoric.com] - it was suggestive enough to cause moderate and short-termed, but state-wide panic during the middle of the actual broadcast. People fleeing their homes, calling for emergency services and so on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , the original radio broadcast [ americanrhetoric.com ] - it was suggestive enough to cause moderate and short-termed , but state-wide panic during the middle of the actual broadcast .
People fleeing their homes , calling for emergency services and so on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, the original radio broadcast [americanrhetoric.com] - it was suggestive enough to cause moderate and short-termed, but state-wide panic during the middle of the actual broadcast.
People fleeing their homes, calling for emergency services and so on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30135366</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder...</title>
	<author>Clovis42</author>
	<datestamp>1258454040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The guy answering the questions speculates this as a possibility at the bottom of the page.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The guy answering the questions speculates this as a possibility at the bottom of the page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The guy answering the questions speculates this as a possibility at the bottom of the page.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132870</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>R2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1258489020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a little more complicated than that.  2012 is more like Y2K - there's an actual event involved, and it's occurrence isn't in question.  I knew the digits on my digital watch were going to change at that point in history, and I know that the Mayan calender ends it's cycle as well.  It's the significance of those events that people wildly over estimate.  The logically challenged have no problem believing that Independence Day was a fantasy because aliens are not established fact.  But they have a problem with conditional logic: Someone presents them with "If A then B" and they think "OMG!  A is true, then B must be true too!".  Of course it ignores both logic and meaning, but it <i>feels</i> right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a little more complicated than that .
2012 is more like Y2K - there 's an actual event involved , and it 's occurrence is n't in question .
I knew the digits on my digital watch were going to change at that point in history , and I know that the Mayan calender ends it 's cycle as well .
It 's the significance of those events that people wildly over estimate .
The logically challenged have no problem believing that Independence Day was a fantasy because aliens are not established fact .
But they have a problem with conditional logic : Someone presents them with " If A then B " and they think " OMG !
A is true , then B must be true too ! " .
Of course it ignores both logic and meaning , but it feels right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a little more complicated than that.
2012 is more like Y2K - there's an actual event involved, and it's occurrence isn't in question.
I knew the digits on my digital watch were going to change at that point in history, and I know that the Mayan calender ends it's cycle as well.
It's the significance of those events that people wildly over estimate.
The logically challenged have no problem believing that Independence Day was a fantasy because aliens are not established fact.
But they have a problem with conditional logic: Someone presents them with "If A then B" and they think "OMG!
A is true, then B must be true too!".
Of course it ignores both logic and meaning, but it feels right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132132</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate title</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258486560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>NASA Attempts To Reason With Idiots, Lunatics</i></p><p>Usually these are known as Funding Requests.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA Attempts To Reason With Idiots , LunaticsUsually these are known as Funding Requests .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA Attempts To Reason With Idiots, LunaticsUsually these are known as Funding Requests.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133434</id>
	<title>Re:In other news</title>
	<author>prefec2</author>
	<datestamp>1258490880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I won't be worrying until the dolphins are gone. And I know where my towel is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wo n't be worrying until the dolphins are gone .
And I know where my towel is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I won't be worrying until the dolphins are gone.
And I know where my towel is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131560</id>
	<title>This is sad</title>
	<author>XSpud</author>
	<datestamp>1258484820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I find it difficult to believe that people can take something like this so seriously to the point they will end their lives. If these people do exist it's very sad that there are people out there who have no way of evaluating information to decide what's real or not. It must make their lives very difficult.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I find it difficult to believe that people can take something like this so seriously to the point they will end their lives .
If these people do exist it 's very sad that there are people out there who have no way of evaluating information to decide what 's real or not .
It must make their lives very difficult .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find it difficult to believe that people can take something like this so seriously to the point they will end their lives.
If these people do exist it's very sad that there are people out there who have no way of evaluating information to decide what's real or not.
It must make their lives very difficult.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30143730</id>
	<title>Re:Not stupid, just scared</title>
	<author>LanMan04</author>
	<datestamp>1257091800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Intelligent people don't get "the fear".  You have to be stupid to buy into the fear in the first place.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Intelligent people do n't get " the fear " .
You have to be stupid to buy into the fear in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Intelligent people don't get "the fear".
You have to be stupid to buy into the fear in the first place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131806</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>radtea</author>
	<datestamp>1258485600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>but to be honest, the whole scientific backstory of the film is so thin I never actually considered that people would genuinely fear a cataclysm as depicted in the movie. "Mutating neutrinos"... really?</i></p><p>Yeah, I can't even hate you for working on it, nor the producers et al for creating it.  It's just a movie, after all, so you don't fall into anything like the same class as the people who are promoting the 2012 thing as <em>fact</em> for their own benefit.</p><p>If anyone ends up killing themselves or ruining their lives, it'll be at the feet of those bastards, not artists and businesspeople who are honestly trying to make a buck piggy-backing on the phenomenon.  You lot have pursued the only honourable way of profiting from this kind of idiocy, and more power to you.</p><p>That given, my question is:  if we have people who want to ban cell phones because of zero evidence that they emit any harmful radiation, when will see a movement to ban panic-mongers?   Panic-mongers do cause demonstrable harm and in the case of the LHC black-hole lies are known to have precipiated at least one death (a teenage girl who committed suicide.)  So while artists making clearly absurd fiction ("mutating neutrinos"?) are in the clear, I think we should be looking very carefully at how to come down hard on panic-mongers.  They are far more dangerous than any of the ridiculous threats they promote.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but to be honest , the whole scientific backstory of the film is so thin I never actually considered that people would genuinely fear a cataclysm as depicted in the movie .
" Mutating neutrinos " ... really ? Yeah , I ca n't even hate you for working on it , nor the producers et al for creating it .
It 's just a movie , after all , so you do n't fall into anything like the same class as the people who are promoting the 2012 thing as fact for their own benefit.If anyone ends up killing themselves or ruining their lives , it 'll be at the feet of those bastards , not artists and businesspeople who are honestly trying to make a buck piggy-backing on the phenomenon .
You lot have pursued the only honourable way of profiting from this kind of idiocy , and more power to you.That given , my question is : if we have people who want to ban cell phones because of zero evidence that they emit any harmful radiation , when will see a movement to ban panic-mongers ?
Panic-mongers do cause demonstrable harm and in the case of the LHC black-hole lies are known to have precipiated at least one death ( a teenage girl who committed suicide .
) So while artists making clearly absurd fiction ( " mutating neutrinos " ?
) are in the clear , I think we should be looking very carefully at how to come down hard on panic-mongers .
They are far more dangerous than any of the ridiculous threats they promote .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but to be honest, the whole scientific backstory of the film is so thin I never actually considered that people would genuinely fear a cataclysm as depicted in the movie.
"Mutating neutrinos"... really?Yeah, I can't even hate you for working on it, nor the producers et al for creating it.
It's just a movie, after all, so you don't fall into anything like the same class as the people who are promoting the 2012 thing as fact for their own benefit.If anyone ends up killing themselves or ruining their lives, it'll be at the feet of those bastards, not artists and businesspeople who are honestly trying to make a buck piggy-backing on the phenomenon.
You lot have pursued the only honourable way of profiting from this kind of idiocy, and more power to you.That given, my question is:  if we have people who want to ban cell phones because of zero evidence that they emit any harmful radiation, when will see a movement to ban panic-mongers?
Panic-mongers do cause demonstrable harm and in the case of the LHC black-hole lies are known to have precipiated at least one death (a teenage girl who committed suicide.
)  So while artists making clearly absurd fiction ("mutating neutrinos"?
) are in the clear, I think we should be looking very carefully at how to come down hard on panic-mongers.
They are far more dangerous than any of the ridiculous threats they promote.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132238</id>
	<title>It could happen...</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1258486920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe/Probably not like in the movie.  I haven't seen it, so I can't say.</p><p>I do worry, slightly, that if the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowstone\_Caldera" title="wikipedia.org">Yellowstone Caldera</a> [wikipedia.org] goes, I may well wish I had been dead first.  And there exists the impossibly tiny possibility that an imminent explosion could be triggered by this whole 'moving through galactic center' business.  Even the scientists on the page would admit they don't know what causes it to erupt.  They don't even know what formed it, for that matter.  But if/when it does go, most of North America will be ashen wilderness for the foreseeable future, planetary temperatures will plummet, etc.  In that light it might be nice to have an idea as to when we're going to see that puppy go up.</p><p>On the other hand, there isn't exactly a single thing you can do to prepare for this kind of an event.  Nothing conceivable anyway, because there exists a greater possibility that nothing interesting will happen at all.  Similar to how the world didn't end yesterday...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe/Probably not like in the movie .
I have n't seen it , so I ca n't say.I do worry , slightly , that if the Yellowstone Caldera [ wikipedia.org ] goes , I may well wish I had been dead first .
And there exists the impossibly tiny possibility that an imminent explosion could be triggered by this whole 'moving through galactic center ' business .
Even the scientists on the page would admit they do n't know what causes it to erupt .
They do n't even know what formed it , for that matter .
But if/when it does go , most of North America will be ashen wilderness for the foreseeable future , planetary temperatures will plummet , etc .
In that light it might be nice to have an idea as to when we 're going to see that puppy go up.On the other hand , there is n't exactly a single thing you can do to prepare for this kind of an event .
Nothing conceivable anyway , because there exists a greater possibility that nothing interesting will happen at all .
Similar to how the world did n't end yesterday.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe/Probably not like in the movie.
I haven't seen it, so I can't say.I do worry, slightly, that if the Yellowstone Caldera [wikipedia.org] goes, I may well wish I had been dead first.
And there exists the impossibly tiny possibility that an imminent explosion could be triggered by this whole 'moving through galactic center' business.
Even the scientists on the page would admit they don't know what causes it to erupt.
They don't even know what formed it, for that matter.
But if/when it does go, most of North America will be ashen wilderness for the foreseeable future, planetary temperatures will plummet, etc.
In that light it might be nice to have an idea as to when we're going to see that puppy go up.On the other hand, there isn't exactly a single thing you can do to prepare for this kind of an event.
Nothing conceivable anyway, because there exists a greater possibility that nothing interesting will happen at all.
Similar to how the world didn't end yesterday...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132496</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>joggle</author>
	<datestamp>1258487760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cut in this case means add, not removed, right? Movie terminology often confuses me...</p><p>Along similar lines, what in the world does the 'best boy' do on the movie? Is he like the local eagle scout doing good deeds for the actors during the movie or something??<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) (I really don't have a clue what the guy does, just always see one listed in the credits)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cut in this case means add , not removed , right ?
Movie terminology often confuses me...Along similar lines , what in the world does the 'best boy ' do on the movie ?
Is he like the local eagle scout doing good deeds for the actors during the movie or something ? ?
: ) ( I really do n't have a clue what the guy does , just always see one listed in the credits )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cut in this case means add, not removed, right?
Movie terminology often confuses me...Along similar lines, what in the world does the 'best boy' do on the movie?
Is he like the local eagle scout doing good deeds for the actors during the movie or something??
:) (I really don't have a clue what the guy does, just always see one listed in the credits)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131766</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>vilms</author>
	<datestamp>1258485420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Patriot Games? Pah! Blade Runner had ENHANCE a whole decade earlier: Deckard and the low-res photo of the apartment, for example...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Patriot Games ?
Pah ! Blade Runner had ENHANCE a whole decade earlier : Deckard and the low-res photo of the apartment , for example.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Patriot Games?
Pah! Blade Runner had ENHANCE a whole decade earlier: Deckard and the low-res photo of the apartment, for example...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133774</id>
	<title>Re:How Histery Repeats ....</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1258448940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was also on a radio station and radio stations occasionally do news broadcasts.</p><p>I've never seen a breaking news broadcast in a movie theatre.  Particularly not when I've paid to see New York get destroyed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was also on a radio station and radio stations occasionally do news broadcasts.I 've never seen a breaking news broadcast in a movie theatre .
Particularly not when I 've paid to see New York get destroyed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was also on a radio station and radio stations occasionally do news broadcasts.I've never seen a breaking news broadcast in a movie theatre.
Particularly not when I've paid to see New York get destroyed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132168</id>
	<title>There's some good to this</title>
	<author>allcoolnameswheretak</author>
	<datestamp>1258486680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While 2012 may be fiction and guillable people are overreacting, it might be a good thing to raise awareness for the doomsday scenario of an earth - massive asteroid collision, which is a very real threat we have no escape plan for.</p><p>We know it has happened at least once already. And I do get a bit nervous when I look at the lunar surface and at all the big craters it's splattered with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While 2012 may be fiction and guillable people are overreacting , it might be a good thing to raise awareness for the doomsday scenario of an earth - massive asteroid collision , which is a very real threat we have no escape plan for.We know it has happened at least once already .
And I do get a bit nervous when I look at the lunar surface and at all the big craters it 's splattered with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While 2012 may be fiction and guillable people are overreacting, it might be a good thing to raise awareness for the doomsday scenario of an earth - massive asteroid collision, which is a very real threat we have no escape plan for.We know it has happened at least once already.
And I do get a bit nervous when I look at the lunar surface and at all the big craters it's splattered with.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133032</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>camperdave</author>
	<datestamp>1258489560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, but Heaven help NASA if they fail to stop it and the angry public comes looking for their trillion dollars back.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but Heaven help NASA if they fail to stop it and the angry public comes looking for their trillion dollars back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but Heaven help NASA if they fail to stop it and the angry public comes looking for their trillion dollars back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133804</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258449000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"-don't even get me started on what our defense budget comes out to be"</p><p>exactly!  get pissed off every time I think about it.</p><p>2010 budget request - DoD baseline = 534 billion  (total military/national security = 901 billion)<br>2010 budget request - NASA = 18.686 billion</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" -do n't even get me started on what our defense budget comes out to be " exactly !
get pissed off every time I think about it.2010 budget request - DoD baseline = 534 billion ( total military/national security = 901 billion ) 2010 budget request - NASA = 18.686 billion</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"-don't even get me started on what our defense budget comes out to be"exactly!
get pissed off every time I think about it.2010 budget request - DoD baseline = 534 billion  (total military/national security = 901 billion)2010 budget request - NASA = 18.686 billion</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131354</id>
	<title>When should I kill myself?</title>
	<author>vanyel</author>
	<datestamp>1258484160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Before you breed...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Before you breed.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Before you breed...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131898</id>
	<title>Easy solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258485780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>..saying they were contemplating committing suicide.. And I don't know how to answer those questions.</p></div><p>Just say it happens in 2009 instead. Weed them out early.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>..saying they were contemplating committing suicide.. And I do n't know how to answer those questions.Just say it happens in 2009 instead .
Weed them out early .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ..saying they were contemplating committing suicide.. And I don't know how to answer those questions.Just say it happens in 2009 instead.
Weed them out early.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131776</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1258485480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd say that NASA is trying to SAVE money by doing this.</p><p>NASA has received many, many questions about 2012, the Mayan calendar, and the latest asshat disaster movie.  Similar, no doubt, to the panic and subsequent derision of science caused in the minds of some by the same level of pseudoscience demonstrated by "The Day After Tomorrow", which some people actually treated as a straw man for climate change theory.</p><p>So, NASA gets tons of emails, calls, etc.  Some of them from people who are apparently suicidal.  The cheapest and most efficient way is, of course, to confirm the rumors to those people and give them maps to their nearest pharmacy, along with detailed instructions on what colorful bottles contain stuff that will do the deed quickly and hopefully painlessly (because we don't want to be cruel).  But the bodies would start to rot and stink, and it might attract Zombies as we all know from a recent documentary on the subject.</p><p>So, what's a governmental agency to do?  Bail out a large institution?  OK, yes, of course, but after that fails again?  And again?  And again?  And again?</p><p>Easy!  Put up a FAQ!</p><p>Because you just know the kind of people who are concerned enough not to do the slightest bit of research before they contemplate suicide are going to head immediately toward a FAQ that disagrees with their preconceived notions.</p><p>But, at least, you have to give NASA credit for trying.  They've put out a clear, concise, level-headed, fact-filled document that really covers the major rumors well and attempts to debunk a few of the weirdest of the weird for-fun-and-profit rumormongers.  In other words, it won't hold up to any argument that the people asking the questions will buy.</p><p>What they really should have put up was "We are safe.  Baby Jeebus told me so".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd say that NASA is trying to SAVE money by doing this.NASA has received many , many questions about 2012 , the Mayan calendar , and the latest asshat disaster movie .
Similar , no doubt , to the panic and subsequent derision of science caused in the minds of some by the same level of pseudoscience demonstrated by " The Day After Tomorrow " , which some people actually treated as a straw man for climate change theory.So , NASA gets tons of emails , calls , etc .
Some of them from people who are apparently suicidal .
The cheapest and most efficient way is , of course , to confirm the rumors to those people and give them maps to their nearest pharmacy , along with detailed instructions on what colorful bottles contain stuff that will do the deed quickly and hopefully painlessly ( because we do n't want to be cruel ) .
But the bodies would start to rot and stink , and it might attract Zombies as we all know from a recent documentary on the subject.So , what 's a governmental agency to do ?
Bail out a large institution ?
OK , yes , of course , but after that fails again ?
And again ?
And again ?
And again ? Easy !
Put up a FAQ ! Because you just know the kind of people who are concerned enough not to do the slightest bit of research before they contemplate suicide are going to head immediately toward a FAQ that disagrees with their preconceived notions.But , at least , you have to give NASA credit for trying .
They 've put out a clear , concise , level-headed , fact-filled document that really covers the major rumors well and attempts to debunk a few of the weirdest of the weird for-fun-and-profit rumormongers .
In other words , it wo n't hold up to any argument that the people asking the questions will buy.What they really should have put up was " We are safe .
Baby Jeebus told me so " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd say that NASA is trying to SAVE money by doing this.NASA has received many, many questions about 2012, the Mayan calendar, and the latest asshat disaster movie.
Similar, no doubt, to the panic and subsequent derision of science caused in the minds of some by the same level of pseudoscience demonstrated by "The Day After Tomorrow", which some people actually treated as a straw man for climate change theory.So, NASA gets tons of emails, calls, etc.
Some of them from people who are apparently suicidal.
The cheapest and most efficient way is, of course, to confirm the rumors to those people and give them maps to their nearest pharmacy, along with detailed instructions on what colorful bottles contain stuff that will do the deed quickly and hopefully painlessly (because we don't want to be cruel).
But the bodies would start to rot and stink, and it might attract Zombies as we all know from a recent documentary on the subject.So, what's a governmental agency to do?
Bail out a large institution?
OK, yes, of course, but after that fails again?
And again?
And again?
And again?Easy!
Put up a FAQ!Because you just know the kind of people who are concerned enough not to do the slightest bit of research before they contemplate suicide are going to head immediately toward a FAQ that disagrees with their preconceived notions.But, at least, you have to give NASA credit for trying.
They've put out a clear, concise, level-headed, fact-filled document that really covers the major rumors well and attempts to debunk a few of the weirdest of the weird for-fun-and-profit rumormongers.
In other words, it won't hold up to any argument that the people asking the questions will buy.What they really should have put up was "We are safe.
Baby Jeebus told me so".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138300</id>
	<title>Re:This is part of NASA's purvey.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258468380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is part of NASA's purvey</p></div><p>I think you mean purview.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is part of NASA 's purveyI think you mean purview .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is part of NASA's purveyI think you mean purview.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133520</id>
	<title>Re:April 3, 2030: 2000th anniversary of crucifixio</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1258491240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thursday? So actually the world will be destroyed by the Vogons<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>Just checked: December 21, 2012 is a Friday. So it clearly won't be the day of doom.</p><p>BTW, I've found the true interpretation of the Mayan calendar: 2012-12-21 will the release date of DNF.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thursday ?
So actually the world will be destroyed by the Vogons ...Just checked : December 21 , 2012 is a Friday .
So it clearly wo n't be the day of doom.BTW , I 've found the true interpretation of the Mayan calendar : 2012-12-21 will the release date of DNF .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thursday?
So actually the world will be destroyed by the Vogons ...Just checked: December 21, 2012 is a Friday.
So it clearly won't be the day of doom.BTW, I've found the true interpretation of the Mayan calendar: 2012-12-21 will the release date of DNF.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131884</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>spun</author>
	<datestamp>1258485780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mi is a hard core anti-government libertarian. For him, there is no excuse to thin to turn into an opportunity to bash the government. He's one of those people who think government can never, <i>ever</i> do anything good. If it looks good, you aren't looking hard enough. To people like Mi, NASA is just socialism for scientists and engineers who should be working in private industry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mi is a hard core anti-government libertarian .
For him , there is no excuse to thin to turn into an opportunity to bash the government .
He 's one of those people who think government can never , ever do anything good .
If it looks good , you are n't looking hard enough .
To people like Mi , NASA is just socialism for scientists and engineers who should be working in private industry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mi is a hard core anti-government libertarian.
For him, there is no excuse to thin to turn into an opportunity to bash the government.
He's one of those people who think government can never, ever do anything good.
If it looks good, you aren't looking hard enough.
To people like Mi, NASA is just socialism for scientists and engineers who should be working in private industry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131276</id>
	<title>Jebus</title>
	<author>alexborges</author>
	<datestamp>1258483920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Methinks its quite idiotic to worry about something that, if it actually hits hard, we wont be able to survive no matter what we do. No, we really can't survive a hit like the one that created the Gulf of Mexico (if indeed the big hole came from an asteroid). Why worry so much about it? I have no idea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Methinks its quite idiotic to worry about something that , if it actually hits hard , we wont be able to survive no matter what we do .
No , we really ca n't survive a hit like the one that created the Gulf of Mexico ( if indeed the big hole came from an asteroid ) .
Why worry so much about it ?
I have no idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Methinks its quite idiotic to worry about something that, if it actually hits hard, we wont be able to survive no matter what we do.
No, we really can't survive a hit like the one that created the Gulf of Mexico (if indeed the big hole came from an asteroid).
Why worry so much about it?
I have no idea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136804</id>
	<title>Re:Not stupid, just scared</title>
	<author>Ifandbut</author>
	<datestamp>1258459680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fear = control. Keep the population fearful of something and you can keep removing their "rights". Reference: passing of the Patriot Act.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fear = control .
Keep the population fearful of something and you can keep removing their " rights " .
Reference : passing of the Patriot Act .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fear = control.
Keep the population fearful of something and you can keep removing their "rights".
Reference: passing of the Patriot Act.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30142282</id>
	<title>If the world is ending, sell me your house...</title>
	<author>hrpatton</author>
	<datestamp>1257084180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... at 75\% of its market value.</p><p>That's the offer I made people during the Millennium panic back in 1999.  I reasoned that if the world were really on the brink of chaos, the wisest policy would be to move somewhere more sustainable than a residential subdivision.  When the utilities collapsed, you'd need renewable sources of electricity, clean water, etc., as well as the ability to defend your home and family against looters and thieves.  Better to spend all your money before the banks and government collapse and currency loses all value.</p><p>Every time I hear about some cult predicting the end of the world, I want to make the same offer.  "Hey, you think the world is going to end next year.  Shouldn't you spend all your resources bringing sinners to God?  What's the matter; don't you have faith?"  I couldn't go through with it if anyone said yes, but the temptation is there.</p><p>The best way to stave off panic is to throw cold, hard money at it.</p><p>See you next Apocalypse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... at 75 \ % of its market value.That 's the offer I made people during the Millennium panic back in 1999 .
I reasoned that if the world were really on the brink of chaos , the wisest policy would be to move somewhere more sustainable than a residential subdivision .
When the utilities collapsed , you 'd need renewable sources of electricity , clean water , etc. , as well as the ability to defend your home and family against looters and thieves .
Better to spend all your money before the banks and government collapse and currency loses all value.Every time I hear about some cult predicting the end of the world , I want to make the same offer .
" Hey , you think the world is going to end next year .
Should n't you spend all your resources bringing sinners to God ?
What 's the matter ; do n't you have faith ?
" I could n't go through with it if anyone said yes , but the temptation is there.The best way to stave off panic is to throw cold , hard money at it.See you next Apocalypse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... at 75\% of its market value.That's the offer I made people during the Millennium panic back in 1999.
I reasoned that if the world were really on the brink of chaos, the wisest policy would be to move somewhere more sustainable than a residential subdivision.
When the utilities collapsed, you'd need renewable sources of electricity, clean water, etc., as well as the ability to defend your home and family against looters and thieves.
Better to spend all your money before the banks and government collapse and currency loses all value.Every time I hear about some cult predicting the end of the world, I want to make the same offer.
"Hey, you think the world is going to end next year.
Shouldn't you spend all your resources bringing sinners to God?
What's the matter; don't you have faith?
"  I couldn't go through with it if anyone said yes, but the temptation is there.The best way to stave off panic is to throw cold, hard money at it.See you next Apocalypse.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180</id>
	<title>It's easy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258483620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You respond with, "It's only a movie. The world isn't ending. Don't kill your children, your pets, or yourself."</htmltext>
<tokenext>You respond with , " It 's only a movie .
The world is n't ending .
Do n't kill your children , your pets , or yourself .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You respond with, "It's only a movie.
The world isn't ending.
Don't kill your children, your pets, or yourself.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132390</id>
	<title>Re:All I want to know is...</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1258487400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are a number of fields you might find profitable:</p><p>
&nbsp; - Nuclear fallout shelters worked well in the 60s.  How about a modern variant?<br>
&nbsp; - The survivors will be reverting to an agrarian culture.  You could offer courses on sharecropping, animal husbandry (be careful of your audience on that one - you might want to pick a different title for the class like "raising animals for food"), etc.<br>
&nbsp; - Guns and ammo will be big sellers to this audience.  Also preserved food.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are a number of fields you might find profitable :   - Nuclear fallout shelters worked well in the 60s .
How about a modern variant ?
  - The survivors will be reverting to an agrarian culture .
You could offer courses on sharecropping , animal husbandry ( be careful of your audience on that one - you might want to pick a different title for the class like " raising animals for food " ) , etc .
  - Guns and ammo will be big sellers to this audience .
Also preserved food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are a number of fields you might find profitable:
  - Nuclear fallout shelters worked well in the 60s.
How about a modern variant?
  - The survivors will be reverting to an agrarian culture.
You could offer courses on sharecropping, animal husbandry (be careful of your audience on that one - you might want to pick a different title for the class like "raising animals for food"), etc.
  - Guns and ammo will be big sellers to this audience.
Also preserved food.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132980</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>R2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1258489380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"a complete nutjob (played very well by Woody Harrelson)"</p><p>That's redundant on so many levels...</p><p>(Although I did enjoy his work in <i>Zombieland</i>.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" a complete nutjob ( played very well by Woody Harrelson ) " That 's redundant on so many levels... ( Although I did enjoy his work in Zombieland .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"a complete nutjob (played very well by Woody Harrelson)"That's redundant on so many levels...(Although I did enjoy his work in Zombieland.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134782</id>
	<title>Re:How History Repeats ....</title>
	<author>frogzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1258452180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the site "Letters of Note" which seems to be down at the moment:</p><p>Aberdeen, S. Dak.<br>November 1, 1938</p><p>Federal Communications Commission<br>Washington, D. C.</p><p>Gentlemen:</p><p>I have read considerable concerning the program of Orson Welles presented over the Columbia Broadcasting System Sunday evening. I suppose that by this time you have received many letters from numerous cranks and crack-pots who quickly became jitterbugs during the program. I was one of the thousands who heard this program and did not jump out of the window, did not attempt suicide, did not break my arm while beating a hasty retreat from my apartment, did not anticipate a horrible death, did not hear the Martians "rapping on my chamber door," did not see the monsters landing in war-like regalia in the park across the street, but sat serenely entertained no end by the fine portrayal of a fine play.</p><p>The "Mercury Theatre" has been one of the radio high-lights of the week for me this fall. The program Sunday, I felt, was one of their better programs.</p><p>Should your commission contemplate serious measures toward the Columbia Broadcasting System my suggestion would be that the "Mercury Theatre" be directed to re-broadcast this program and the reaction of all the listening audience be solicited.</p><p>In the interest of a continuation of the fine things in radio today, I am,</p><p>Very respectfully yours,</p><p>(Signed)</p><p>J. V. Yaukey</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the site " Letters of Note " which seems to be down at the moment : Aberdeen , S. Dak.November 1 , 1938Federal Communications CommissionWashington , D. C.Gentlemen : I have read considerable concerning the program of Orson Welles presented over the Columbia Broadcasting System Sunday evening .
I suppose that by this time you have received many letters from numerous cranks and crack-pots who quickly became jitterbugs during the program .
I was one of the thousands who heard this program and did not jump out of the window , did not attempt suicide , did not break my arm while beating a hasty retreat from my apartment , did not anticipate a horrible death , did not hear the Martians " rapping on my chamber door , " did not see the monsters landing in war-like regalia in the park across the street , but sat serenely entertained no end by the fine portrayal of a fine play.The " Mercury Theatre " has been one of the radio high-lights of the week for me this fall .
The program Sunday , I felt , was one of their better programs.Should your commission contemplate serious measures toward the Columbia Broadcasting System my suggestion would be that the " Mercury Theatre " be directed to re-broadcast this program and the reaction of all the listening audience be solicited.In the interest of a continuation of the fine things in radio today , I am,Very respectfully yours , ( Signed ) J. V. Yaukey</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the site "Letters of Note" which seems to be down at the moment:Aberdeen, S. Dak.November 1, 1938Federal Communications CommissionWashington, D. C.Gentlemen:I have read considerable concerning the program of Orson Welles presented over the Columbia Broadcasting System Sunday evening.
I suppose that by this time you have received many letters from numerous cranks and crack-pots who quickly became jitterbugs during the program.
I was one of the thousands who heard this program and did not jump out of the window, did not attempt suicide, did not break my arm while beating a hasty retreat from my apartment, did not anticipate a horrible death, did not hear the Martians "rapping on my chamber door," did not see the monsters landing in war-like regalia in the park across the street, but sat serenely entertained no end by the fine portrayal of a fine play.The "Mercury Theatre" has been one of the radio high-lights of the week for me this fall.
The program Sunday, I felt, was one of their better programs.Should your commission contemplate serious measures toward the Columbia Broadcasting System my suggestion would be that the "Mercury Theatre" be directed to re-broadcast this program and the reaction of all the listening audience be solicited.In the interest of a continuation of the fine things in radio today, I am,Very respectfully yours,(Signed)J. V. Yaukey</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30140538</id>
	<title>Re:Oblig Movie Quote</title>
	<author>GaryPatterson</author>
	<datestamp>1258487100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That plague? It'll start with an unsanitised public telephone.</p><p>Bad things can happen when you rid yourselves of one-third of the population, or as some might say, "a load of useless bloody loonies."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That plague ?
It 'll start with an unsanitised public telephone.Bad things can happen when you rid yourselves of one-third of the population , or as some might say , " a load of useless bloody loonies .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That plague?
It'll start with an unsanitised public telephone.Bad things can happen when you rid yourselves of one-third of the population, or as some might say, "a load of useless bloody loonies.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132674</id>
	<title>Will you LISTEN to yourselves?</title>
	<author>Fantastic Lad</author>
	<datestamp>1258488360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just because you happen not to have fallen for this particular piece of idiocy doesn't mean that half of you don't believe in the Swine Flu, or the Evil Terrorists, or the Free Market, or whatever your chosen flavor of gullible happens to be.</p><p>Culled between so-called, "Science" (as opposed to the real thing), and religion, there remain precious few rational thinkers in the world.</p><p>SO don't be so quick to judge.  If everybody who believes in a stupid lie were to be struck dead right now, there would be tumbleweeds blowing through this forum.  I remember when virtually everybody here once believed in WMD's with a salivating kind of vigor.</p><p>In any case. . , the 2012 thing IS a myth, but just the date.  Our world is right now on the cusp of a mass extinction and everybody knows it.  The lie is in the fixed date.  That's a distraction to confuse people with idiotic debate while the elites scurry to pack their tunnels with food and supplies.</p><p>-FL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just because you happen not to have fallen for this particular piece of idiocy does n't mean that half of you do n't believe in the Swine Flu , or the Evil Terrorists , or the Free Market , or whatever your chosen flavor of gullible happens to be.Culled between so-called , " Science " ( as opposed to the real thing ) , and religion , there remain precious few rational thinkers in the world.SO do n't be so quick to judge .
If everybody who believes in a stupid lie were to be struck dead right now , there would be tumbleweeds blowing through this forum .
I remember when virtually everybody here once believed in WMD 's with a salivating kind of vigor.In any case .
. , the 2012 thing IS a myth , but just the date .
Our world is right now on the cusp of a mass extinction and everybody knows it .
The lie is in the fixed date .
That 's a distraction to confuse people with idiotic debate while the elites scurry to pack their tunnels with food and supplies.-FL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just because you happen not to have fallen for this particular piece of idiocy doesn't mean that half of you don't believe in the Swine Flu, or the Evil Terrorists, or the Free Market, or whatever your chosen flavor of gullible happens to be.Culled between so-called, "Science" (as opposed to the real thing), and religion, there remain precious few rational thinkers in the world.SO don't be so quick to judge.
If everybody who believes in a stupid lie were to be struck dead right now, there would be tumbleweeds blowing through this forum.
I remember when virtually everybody here once believed in WMD's with a salivating kind of vigor.In any case.
. , the 2012 thing IS a myth, but just the date.
Our world is right now on the cusp of a mass extinction and everybody knows it.
The lie is in the fixed date.
That's a distraction to confuse people with idiotic debate while the elites scurry to pack their tunnels with food and supplies.-FL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132750</id>
	<title>How do you answer these questions?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258488600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't.... just let evolution run its course.  NASA shouldn't be the lifeguard on duty at the gene pool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't.... just let evolution run its course .
NASA should n't be the lifeguard on duty at the gene pool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't.... just let evolution run its course.
NASA shouldn't be the lifeguard on duty at the gene pool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131432</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258484340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Taxpayers' money is spent on religion all the time. I don't see why this is any different. It's all fiction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Taxpayers ' money is spent on religion all the time .
I do n't see why this is any different .
It 's all fiction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Taxpayers' money is spent on religion all the time.
I don't see why this is any different.
It's all fiction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132086</id>
	<title>How stupid are people?</title>
	<author>prefec2</author>
	<datestamp>1258486440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You go in a movie theater, watching a movie with fancy effects and a lot of sound and destruction which so ridiculous that is obvious that it is not a documentary or a feasable forecast. How could anyone really believe it? Do they have no education at all? Or are they just dumb from watching too much TV?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You go in a movie theater , watching a movie with fancy effects and a lot of sound and destruction which so ridiculous that is obvious that it is not a documentary or a feasable forecast .
How could anyone really believe it ?
Do they have no education at all ?
Or are they just dumb from watching too much TV ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You go in a movie theater, watching a movie with fancy effects and a lot of sound and destruction which so ridiculous that is obvious that it is not a documentary or a feasable forecast.
How could anyone really believe it?
Do they have no education at all?
Or are they just dumb from watching too much TV?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131282</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>Florian Weimer</author>
	<datestamp>1258483920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense?</i></p><p>It's one way of doing science PR these days, I guess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is the taxpayer 's money being spent on this nonsense ? It 's one way of doing science PR these days , I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense?It's one way of doing science PR these days, I guess.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131202</id>
	<title>In related news</title>
	<author>Dyinobal</author>
	<datestamp>1258483620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nasa tries to convince people that the moon is also not made of cheese, despite what cartoons clearly depict.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nasa tries to convince people that the moon is also not made of cheese , despite what cartoons clearly depict .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nasa tries to convince people that the moon is also not made of cheese, despite what cartoons clearly depict.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134624</id>
	<title>Just one piece of reality-check?</title>
	<author>WheelDweller</author>
	<datestamp>1258451640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Before I'm modded down for being Christian or thinking that science goes along with that, I have just one question to ask.</p><p>If the Mayans were such brilliant astronomers, and we should heed their warning, where was THEIR warning that their civilization would all-but-end?  Why should we listen to a source that has already proven they didn't see a disaster coming?</p><p>Instead, we have lots of hoaxes of our own:<br>PolulationBomb(TM)<br>GlobalWarming(TM)<br>OzoneHole(TM)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...you get the idea.  It's never a good idea to let people just LIVE; we have to scare them, too!  Thanks liberals!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Before I 'm modded down for being Christian or thinking that science goes along with that , I have just one question to ask.If the Mayans were such brilliant astronomers , and we should heed their warning , where was THEIR warning that their civilization would all-but-end ?
Why should we listen to a source that has already proven they did n't see a disaster coming ? Instead , we have lots of hoaxes of our own : PolulationBomb ( TM ) GlobalWarming ( TM ) OzoneHole ( TM ) ...you get the idea .
It 's never a good idea to let people just LIVE ; we have to scare them , too !
Thanks liberals !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Before I'm modded down for being Christian or thinking that science goes along with that, I have just one question to ask.If the Mayans were such brilliant astronomers, and we should heed their warning, where was THEIR warning that their civilization would all-but-end?
Why should we listen to a source that has already proven they didn't see a disaster coming?Instead, we have lots of hoaxes of our own:PolulationBomb(TM)GlobalWarming(TM)OzoneHole(TM) ...you get the idea.
It's never a good idea to let people just LIVE; we have to scare them, too!
Thanks liberals!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133824</id>
	<title>One minute to go</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258449060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>;-(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>; - (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>;-(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133166</id>
	<title>Re:Why is NASA answering Hollywood Questions?</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1258489920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Why is NASA answering these questions some of which surely are just jokes?</i></p><p>I'm not with NASA but the answer seems obvious to me, but it must not be obvious to everyone or your question wouldn't be redundant. Someone else asked it earlier and I already answered it.</p><p><i>Can't they tell the difference?</i></p><p>Yes, but the general public can't.</p><p><i>Why is it NASAs' job to handle this? </i></p><p>Where elase will you find so many astronomers and astrophysicists?</p><p><i>Not that educating isn't important, but instead of the symptom, go for the cure?</i></p><p>Education IS the cure. The disease is ignorance.</p><p><i>there should be laws called crimes against reality </i></p><p>I'm glad you're not a legislator. You would outlaw fiction.</p><p><i>what about damage to minds?</i></p><p>You're a member of the Partnership for a Drug Free America, aren't you? And drugs aside, I'm a big fan of a good mindfuck.</p><p><i>Isn't there some sort of rational response that should be made when we become aware of a vast swath of ignorant people?</i></p><p>Do you work for the department of redundancy department? NASA's rebuttal of this nonsense IS the rational response to nonsense that people believe.</p><p><i>Do your jobs which is managing space and research</i></p><p>Then bye bye <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/iotd.html" title="nasa.gov">NASA picture of the day</a> [nasa.gov] and all the other good things I find at nasa.gov then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is NASA answering these questions some of which surely are just jokes ? I 'm not with NASA but the answer seems obvious to me , but it must not be obvious to everyone or your question would n't be redundant .
Someone else asked it earlier and I already answered it.Ca n't they tell the difference ? Yes , but the general public ca n't.Why is it NASAs ' job to handle this ?
Where elase will you find so many astronomers and astrophysicists ? Not that educating is n't important , but instead of the symptom , go for the cure ? Education IS the cure .
The disease is ignorance.there should be laws called crimes against reality I 'm glad you 're not a legislator .
You would outlaw fiction.what about damage to minds ? You 're a member of the Partnership for a Drug Free America , are n't you ?
And drugs aside , I 'm a big fan of a good mindfuck.Is n't there some sort of rational response that should be made when we become aware of a vast swath of ignorant people ? Do you work for the department of redundancy department ?
NASA 's rebuttal of this nonsense IS the rational response to nonsense that people believe.Do your jobs which is managing space and researchThen bye bye NASA picture of the day [ nasa.gov ] and all the other good things I find at nasa.gov then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is NASA answering these questions some of which surely are just jokes?I'm not with NASA but the answer seems obvious to me, but it must not be obvious to everyone or your question wouldn't be redundant.
Someone else asked it earlier and I already answered it.Can't they tell the difference?Yes, but the general public can't.Why is it NASAs' job to handle this?
Where elase will you find so many astronomers and astrophysicists?Not that educating isn't important, but instead of the symptom, go for the cure?Education IS the cure.
The disease is ignorance.there should be laws called crimes against reality I'm glad you're not a legislator.
You would outlaw fiction.what about damage to minds?You're a member of the Partnership for a Drug Free America, aren't you?
And drugs aside, I'm a big fan of a good mindfuck.Isn't there some sort of rational response that should be made when we become aware of a vast swath of ignorant people?Do you work for the department of redundancy department?
NASA's rebuttal of this nonsense IS the rational response to nonsense that people believe.Do your jobs which is managing space and researchThen bye bye NASA picture of the day [nasa.gov] and all the other good things I find at nasa.gov then.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980</id>
	<title>Not stupid, just scared</title>
	<author>darthwader</author>
	<datestamp>1258486080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lots of people have commented on how incredibly stupid these people are.  I don't think it's quite that simple.</p><p>I think that they're just scared.  There's so much fear in our culture, people are scared of health care, scared of a black president, scared of terrorists, scared of oil prices, scared of cell phone companies, scared of pirates (the Somalian kind), scared of pirates (the MPAA kind), scared of the RIAA and MPAA, scared of swine flu, scared of unemployment, scared of having a job that doesn't pay a living wage, scared of peanuts, scared of global warming, scared of pollution, scared of home invasions, scared of floods, earthquakes and fires, scared of nuts with guns, scared of the government taking away everyone's guns.</p><p>Fear makes you irrational.  It suppresses the "carefully think about the situation" part of your brain, and supercharges the "fight or flight" part.  If people stopped to think rationally about it, they would realize it is fiction.  But the fear prevents them from thinking rationally.</p><p>We live in a constant state of fear, and our culture (or our media, depending on how you look at it) keeps giving us more reasons to be afraid.</p><p>What we need is more reason to be hopeful, not fearful. If we remove the irrational fears about health care, presidents, terrorists, MPAA, pirates, global warming, etc., then we would also have fewer irrational fears about the planet Nimbus crashing into Earth on December 21st, 2012.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lots of people have commented on how incredibly stupid these people are .
I do n't think it 's quite that simple.I think that they 're just scared .
There 's so much fear in our culture , people are scared of health care , scared of a black president , scared of terrorists , scared of oil prices , scared of cell phone companies , scared of pirates ( the Somalian kind ) , scared of pirates ( the MPAA kind ) , scared of the RIAA and MPAA , scared of swine flu , scared of unemployment , scared of having a job that does n't pay a living wage , scared of peanuts , scared of global warming , scared of pollution , scared of home invasions , scared of floods , earthquakes and fires , scared of nuts with guns , scared of the government taking away everyone 's guns.Fear makes you irrational .
It suppresses the " carefully think about the situation " part of your brain , and supercharges the " fight or flight " part .
If people stopped to think rationally about it , they would realize it is fiction .
But the fear prevents them from thinking rationally.We live in a constant state of fear , and our culture ( or our media , depending on how you look at it ) keeps giving us more reasons to be afraid.What we need is more reason to be hopeful , not fearful .
If we remove the irrational fears about health care , presidents , terrorists , MPAA , pirates , global warming , etc. , then we would also have fewer irrational fears about the planet Nimbus crashing into Earth on December 21st , 2012 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lots of people have commented on how incredibly stupid these people are.
I don't think it's quite that simple.I think that they're just scared.
There's so much fear in our culture, people are scared of health care, scared of a black president, scared of terrorists, scared of oil prices, scared of cell phone companies, scared of pirates (the Somalian kind), scared of pirates (the MPAA kind), scared of the RIAA and MPAA, scared of swine flu, scared of unemployment, scared of having a job that doesn't pay a living wage, scared of peanuts, scared of global warming, scared of pollution, scared of home invasions, scared of floods, earthquakes and fires, scared of nuts with guns, scared of the government taking away everyone's guns.Fear makes you irrational.
It suppresses the "carefully think about the situation" part of your brain, and supercharges the "fight or flight" part.
If people stopped to think rationally about it, they would realize it is fiction.
But the fear prevents them from thinking rationally.We live in a constant state of fear, and our culture (or our media, depending on how you look at it) keeps giving us more reasons to be afraid.What we need is more reason to be hopeful, not fearful.
If we remove the irrational fears about health care, presidents, terrorists, MPAA, pirates, global warming, etc., then we would also have fewer irrational fears about the planet Nimbus crashing into Earth on December 21st, 2012.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136258</id>
	<title>Of course...</title>
	<author>roc97007</author>
	<datestamp>1258457520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
That's what they would say even if there were a planet<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...what the hell was it called...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...Nibiru... about to collide with Earth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what they would say even if there were a planet ...what the hell was it called... ...Nibiru... about to collide with Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
That's what they would say even if there were a planet ...what the hell was it called... ...Nibiru... about to collide with Earth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131312</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>ThinkWeak</author>
	<datestamp>1258484040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You got it.  Santa Claus questions would probably be referred to the TSA.  The black cat questions might be referred to the Corps of Engineers.  <br> <br>
I could be wrong though, so you may want to check <a href="HREF" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitehouse.gov/open/</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>You got it .
Santa Claus questions would probably be referred to the TSA .
The black cat questions might be referred to the Corps of Engineers .
I could be wrong though , so you may want to check http : //www.whitehouse.gov/open/ [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You got it.
Santa Claus questions would probably be referred to the TSA.
The black cat questions might be referred to the Corps of Engineers.
I could be wrong though, so you may want to check http://www.whitehouse.gov/open/ [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131748</id>
	<title>Re:In other news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258485360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><ul><li> <a href="\%23iaea" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">arteo</a> [slashdot.org] niarton iart nrt niarton </li><li>ao <strong>niarton</strong> ia</li><li>aie oriatd or</li><li>aeor iatde or</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>arteo [ slashdot.org ] niarton iart nrt niarton ao niarton iaaie oriatd oraeor iatde or</tokentext>
<sentencetext> arteo [slashdot.org] niarton iart nrt niarton ao niarton iaaie oriatd oraeor iatde or</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136004</id>
	<title>Of course, there actually IS a planet Nibiru . . .</title>
	<author>SEE</author>
	<datestamp>1258456440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>. . . because Nibiru is the name of Jupiter in the Babylonian compendium of astrology, Mul.Apin.</p><p>Jupiter isn't going anywhere, of course.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.
. .
because Nibiru is the name of Jupiter in the Babylonian compendium of astrology , Mul.Apin.Jupiter is n't going anywhere , of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.
. .
because Nibiru is the name of Jupiter in the Babylonian compendium of astrology, Mul.Apin.Jupiter isn't going anywhere, of course.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132352</id>
	<title>For Crying Out Loud!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258487280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If people are seriously contemplating suicide because of a movie, just let them die. How could letting anyone that stupid off themselves be a bad thing?</p><p>As for the kids, maybe they have a chance, but their breeding doesn't exactly inspire confidence. I guess we'll have to see how they turn out when 2036 hits theaters. (This time with 99942 Apophis in a starring role.)</p><p>I say we run more apocalyptic fiction. How about covering oil shocks next time? I'm sure The Road will have a similar impact, too. Ooh, I know! Let's air 'The Day After' on all the major networks again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If people are seriously contemplating suicide because of a movie , just let them die .
How could letting anyone that stupid off themselves be a bad thing ? As for the kids , maybe they have a chance , but their breeding does n't exactly inspire confidence .
I guess we 'll have to see how they turn out when 2036 hits theaters .
( This time with 99942 Apophis in a starring role .
) I say we run more apocalyptic fiction .
How about covering oil shocks next time ?
I 'm sure The Road will have a similar impact , too .
Ooh , I know !
Let 's air 'The Day After ' on all the major networks again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If people are seriously contemplating suicide because of a movie, just let them die.
How could letting anyone that stupid off themselves be a bad thing?As for the kids, maybe they have a chance, but their breeding doesn't exactly inspire confidence.
I guess we'll have to see how they turn out when 2036 hits theaters.
(This time with 99942 Apophis in a starring role.
)I say we run more apocalyptic fiction.
How about covering oil shocks next time?
I'm sure The Road will have a similar impact, too.
Ooh, I know!
Let's air 'The Day After' on all the major networks again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132298</id>
	<title>FAQ takes wrong approach</title>
	<author>GradiusCVK</author>
	<datestamp>1258487100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, I love NASA and the work they do, and I learned some interesting things reading that FAQ (particularly from the links to other active projects). Sadly, I think they take the wrong approach to deal with fucktards who think they should kill themselves and their loved ones to spare them from the apocalypse. Take this quote from the FAQ, for instance:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Q: Is the Earth in danger of being hit by a meteor in 2012?<br>
A: The Earth has always been subject to impacts by comets and asteroids, although big hits are very rare. The last big impact was 65 million years ago, and that led to the extinction of the dinosaurs...</p></div><p>Okay, time out. Yes, the answer goes on to explain that "you can see for yourself that nothing is predicted to hit in 2012". The problem here is, no, they won't go and see for themselves. In fact, they won't read to the end to even see that. They will see "Earth has always been subject to impacts", and "led to the extinction of the dinosaurs", and fucking freak out.</p><p>
Granted, my response would probably be something like "No, that's a stupid question, you're a fucking idiot, and you should kill yourself anyway", but if the goal is to save retards from themselves, perhaps NASA ought to write a FAQ for idiots and post it on www.thereisnoimpendingapocalypse.com.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , I love NASA and the work they do , and I learned some interesting things reading that FAQ ( particularly from the links to other active projects ) .
Sadly , I think they take the wrong approach to deal with fucktards who think they should kill themselves and their loved ones to spare them from the apocalypse .
Take this quote from the FAQ , for instance : Q : Is the Earth in danger of being hit by a meteor in 2012 ?
A : The Earth has always been subject to impacts by comets and asteroids , although big hits are very rare .
The last big impact was 65 million years ago , and that led to the extinction of the dinosaurs...Okay , time out .
Yes , the answer goes on to explain that " you can see for yourself that nothing is predicted to hit in 2012 " .
The problem here is , no , they wo n't go and see for themselves .
In fact , they wo n't read to the end to even see that .
They will see " Earth has always been subject to impacts " , and " led to the extinction of the dinosaurs " , and fucking freak out .
Granted , my response would probably be something like " No , that 's a stupid question , you 're a fucking idiot , and you should kill yourself anyway " , but if the goal is to save retards from themselves , perhaps NASA ought to write a FAQ for idiots and post it on www.thereisnoimpendingapocalypse.com .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, I love NASA and the work they do, and I learned some interesting things reading that FAQ (particularly from the links to other active projects).
Sadly, I think they take the wrong approach to deal with fucktards who think they should kill themselves and their loved ones to spare them from the apocalypse.
Take this quote from the FAQ, for instance:Q: Is the Earth in danger of being hit by a meteor in 2012?
A: The Earth has always been subject to impacts by comets and asteroids, although big hits are very rare.
The last big impact was 65 million years ago, and that led to the extinction of the dinosaurs...Okay, time out.
Yes, the answer goes on to explain that "you can see for yourself that nothing is predicted to hit in 2012".
The problem here is, no, they won't go and see for themselves.
In fact, they won't read to the end to even see that.
They will see "Earth has always been subject to impacts", and "led to the extinction of the dinosaurs", and fucking freak out.
Granted, my response would probably be something like "No, that's a stupid question, you're a fucking idiot, and you should kill yourself anyway", but if the goal is to save retards from themselves, perhaps NASA ought to write a FAQ for idiots and post it on www.thereisnoimpendingapocalypse.com.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131720</id>
	<title>World ending in 2012?</title>
	<author>Jason Levine</author>
	<datestamp>1258485360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would people believe the world is ending in 2012 when there's clear evidence that the Earth/mankind survive until <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060028/" title="imdb.com">the 23rd century</a> [imdb.com]?</p><p>(Hey, if people will believe that 2012 is a documentary showing the end of the world, maybe they'll buy this!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would people believe the world is ending in 2012 when there 's clear evidence that the Earth/mankind survive until the 23rd century [ imdb.com ] ?
( Hey , if people will believe that 2012 is a documentary showing the end of the world , maybe they 'll buy this !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would people believe the world is ending in 2012 when there's clear evidence that the Earth/mankind survive until the 23rd century [imdb.com]?
(Hey, if people will believe that 2012 is a documentary showing the end of the world, maybe they'll buy this!
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134998</id>
	<title>I offer 2012 insurance</title>
	<author>sp3d2orbit</author>
	<datestamp>1258452900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, if you really believe 2012 is the end, I have a wonderful deal for you:</p><p>I will give you 50\% of the cash value for all your belongings AND you can keep them through 2012. IF the world doesn't end, I get to have your things in 2013.</p><p>Any takers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , if you really believe 2012 is the end , I have a wonderful deal for you : I will give you 50 \ % of the cash value for all your belongings AND you can keep them through 2012 .
IF the world does n't end , I get to have your things in 2013.Any takers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, if you really believe 2012 is the end, I have a wonderful deal for you:I will give you 50\% of the cash value for all your belongings AND you can keep them through 2012.
IF the world doesn't end, I get to have your things in 2013.Any takers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131244</id>
	<title>I wonder...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258483800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>How many of those sending their questions to NASA are part of the 2012 movie marketing campaign?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How many of those sending their questions to NASA are part of the 2012 movie marketing campaign ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many of those sending their questions to NASA are part of the 2012 movie marketing campaign?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131230</id>
	<title>welcome to the web</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258483740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Welcome to the internet, David Morrison.<br>I too bought over 9000 pills to commit suicide.<br>Do you believe me too?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcome to the internet , David Morrison.I too bought over 9000 pills to commit suicide.Do you believe me too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Welcome to the internet, David Morrison.I too bought over 9000 pills to commit suicide.Do you believe me too?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133512</id>
	<title>***SPOILER ALERT***</title>
	<author>Stregano</author>
	<datestamp>1258491180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is normally something good to put before you start throwing in spoilers to the movie.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is normally something good to put before you start throwing in spoilers to the movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is normally something good to put before you start throwing in spoilers to the movie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132564</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>molo</author>
	<datestamp>1258488000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I personally cut about 80\% of the computer screen beeps.  And I cut every one of them just for you guys, because I know you love them so much<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></div><p>Thank you!  Now please get hired for every other movie and show on TV.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>-molo</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I personally cut about 80 \ % of the computer screen beeps .
And I cut every one of them just for you guys , because I know you love them so much : DThank you !
Now please get hired for every other movie and show on TV .
: ) -molo</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I personally cut about 80\% of the computer screen beeps.
And I cut every one of them just for you guys, because I know you love them so much :DThank you!
Now please get hired for every other movie and show on TV.
:)-molo
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132134</id>
	<title>Re:Not stupid, just scared - just stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258486560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look at the definition for psychotic, travel from there to delusion. We recognize those as a mental problem.</p><p>The problem is as a society we stand proudly on the thin edge of religion with an unprovable God. A strict application of the definitions of Delusion and Psychotic would line up a very large segment of the population for the psych ward.</p><p>How do you tell the difference between the voice of God in your head and just "voices"?</p><p>The fear and uncertainty and all that just feed into the blind acceptance of "god" like acts. Thus the god-fearing population runs scared from pronouncements like this.</p><p>The above poster "If we remove the irrational fears" that would include any form of God.</p><p>I know I am going to get flamed like crazy for this hence the anon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at the definition for psychotic , travel from there to delusion .
We recognize those as a mental problem.The problem is as a society we stand proudly on the thin edge of religion with an unprovable God .
A strict application of the definitions of Delusion and Psychotic would line up a very large segment of the population for the psych ward.How do you tell the difference between the voice of God in your head and just " voices " ? The fear and uncertainty and all that just feed into the blind acceptance of " god " like acts .
Thus the god-fearing population runs scared from pronouncements like this.The above poster " If we remove the irrational fears " that would include any form of God.I know I am going to get flamed like crazy for this hence the anon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at the definition for psychotic, travel from there to delusion.
We recognize those as a mental problem.The problem is as a society we stand proudly on the thin edge of religion with an unprovable God.
A strict application of the definitions of Delusion and Psychotic would line up a very large segment of the population for the psych ward.How do you tell the difference between the voice of God in your head and just "voices"?The fear and uncertainty and all that just feed into the blind acceptance of "god" like acts.
Thus the god-fearing population runs scared from pronouncements like this.The above poster "If we remove the irrational fears" that would include any form of God.I know I am going to get flamed like crazy for this hence the anon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132068</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1258486380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Go ahead, spend a few minutes to hand write them a letter</p></div></blockquote><p>Well it wroked for Gordan Brown...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Go ahead , spend a few minutes to hand write them a letterWell it wroked for Gordan Brown.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go ahead, spend a few minutes to hand write them a letterWell it wroked for Gordan Brown...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186</id>
	<title>Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>mi</author>
	<datestamp>1258483620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense? What's next? Scientific evidence, that there is no Santa Claus? That black cats crossing your path do not cause "bad luck" (whatever that is)?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is the taxpayer 's money being spent on this nonsense ?
What 's next ?
Scientific evidence , that there is no Santa Claus ?
That black cats crossing your path do not cause " bad luck " ( whatever that is ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense?
What's next?
Scientific evidence, that there is no Santa Claus?
That black cats crossing your path do not cause "bad luck" (whatever that is)?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132986</id>
	<title>Re:No you don't</title>
	<author>publiclurker</author>
	<datestamp>1258489440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But if he believes you then he is obviously not a very bright individual, and I'd rather not have to take a job that could be handled by someone like that as I'd quickly bore myself to death.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But if he believes you then he is obviously not a very bright individual , and I 'd rather not have to take a job that could be handled by someone like that as I 'd quickly bore myself to death .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But if he believes you then he is obviously not a very bright individual, and I'd rather not have to take a job that could be handled by someone like that as I'd quickly bore myself to death.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132302</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>aztektum</author>
	<datestamp>1258487100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>True. It's in the governments best interests to keep the stupid ones alive and blindly paying taxes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>True .
It 's in the governments best interests to keep the stupid ones alive and blindly paying taxes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True.
It's in the governments best interests to keep the stupid ones alive and blindly paying taxes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133718</id>
	<title>politics as usual...</title>
	<author>bugs2squash</author>
	<datestamp>1258448700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only reason the end of the world in 2012 is not being properly covered by news outlets is because of their well-known liberal bias. They know that 2012 will be an election year and that the GOP has a better end-of-the-world plan.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only reason the end of the world in 2012 is not being properly covered by news outlets is because of their well-known liberal bias .
They know that 2012 will be an election year and that the GOP has a better end-of-the-world plan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only reason the end of the world in 2012 is not being properly covered by news outlets is because of their well-known liberal bias.
They know that 2012 will be an election year and that the GOP has a better end-of-the-world plan.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132224</id>
	<title>I can't wait for 2012</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258486920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So when the day it is supposed to come about, and absolutely nothing happens apart from being an frantic day full of people buying almost-last minute Christmas gifts.  and then all of us who are intelligent enough to know that nothing catastrophic is going to happen, we can all sit back, crack open a cold one and roflmao at everyone for being stupid enough to believe in this conspiracy.</p><p>I also can't wait to see what people will come up with next, now it is "2012, the day the Earth, Sun, and Galatic Center align!" next its going to be something stupid like 2102 "The day the earth, the sun, and the galatic center align with the center of the universe!!!!1!one!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So when the day it is supposed to come about , and absolutely nothing happens apart from being an frantic day full of people buying almost-last minute Christmas gifts .
and then all of us who are intelligent enough to know that nothing catastrophic is going to happen , we can all sit back , crack open a cold one and roflmao at everyone for being stupid enough to believe in this conspiracy.I also ca n't wait to see what people will come up with next , now it is " 2012 , the day the Earth , Sun , and Galatic Center align !
" next its going to be something stupid like 2102 " The day the earth , the sun , and the galatic center align with the center of the universe ! ! ! ! 1 ! one !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So when the day it is supposed to come about, and absolutely nothing happens apart from being an frantic day full of people buying almost-last minute Christmas gifts.
and then all of us who are intelligent enough to know that nothing catastrophic is going to happen, we can all sit back, crack open a cold one and roflmao at everyone for being stupid enough to believe in this conspiracy.I also can't wait to see what people will come up with next, now it is "2012, the day the Earth, Sun, and Galatic Center align!
" next its going to be something stupid like 2102 "The day the earth, the sun, and the galatic center align with the center of the universe!!!!1!one!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131514</id>
	<title>Re:In other news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258484640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Reports of time-traveling robots looking for John Connor are unsubstantiated at this time."</p><p>Only because the people of CA elected him governor</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Reports of time-traveling robots looking for John Connor are unsubstantiated at this time .
" Only because the people of CA elected him governor</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Reports of time-traveling robots looking for John Connor are unsubstantiated at this time.
"Only because the people of CA elected him governor</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132078</id>
	<title>Re:When should I kill myself?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258486380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm kinda surprised at the number of sociopathic posts in this thread.(even for Slashdot...)</p><p>Why is the 'stupid people deserve to die anyway' crowd so large here? How is that previous statement any less abhorrent than:</p><p>'all people of X race deserve to die'<br>'all people who dont have genes as superior as mine deserve to die'<br>'all people who are physically disabled in any way deserve to die'</p><p>I'd rather be surrounded by loving, well meaning idiots than intelligent malevolent douche bags. Ironically perhaps, ignorance is all people are displaying when they chant such hateful bullshit.</p><p>Yes I know some are joking. But I'd guess a scary majority of them are not...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm kinda surprised at the number of sociopathic posts in this thread .
( even for Slashdot... ) Why is the 'stupid people deserve to die anyway ' crowd so large here ?
How is that previous statement any less abhorrent than : 'all people of X race deserve to die''all people who dont have genes as superior as mine deserve to die''all people who are physically disabled in any way deserve to die'I 'd rather be surrounded by loving , well meaning idiots than intelligent malevolent douche bags .
Ironically perhaps , ignorance is all people are displaying when they chant such hateful bullshit.Yes I know some are joking .
But I 'd guess a scary majority of them are not.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm kinda surprised at the number of sociopathic posts in this thread.
(even for Slashdot...)Why is the 'stupid people deserve to die anyway' crowd so large here?
How is that previous statement any less abhorrent than:'all people of X race deserve to die''all people who dont have genes as superior as mine deserve to die''all people who are physically disabled in any way deserve to die'I'd rather be surrounded by loving, well meaning idiots than intelligent malevolent douche bags.
Ironically perhaps, ignorance is all people are displaying when they chant such hateful bullshit.Yes I know some are joking.
But I'd guess a scary majority of them are not...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1258486680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>No NASA should respond with "Yes it's real and we need $1 trillion in funding to determine how to stop it" and then spend that on real research.</i></p><p>That's awesome.  And then in 2013 when the public goes "Hey, you took that $1 trillion and built a space station and a moon base and a bunch of rockets and solar power stations and telescopes and rovers and stuff, when you were supposed to be preventing the end of the world!"</p><p>And NASA can say "What do you think all that stuff was for?  It worked, didn't it?"</p><p>LOL.  Make it so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No NASA should respond with " Yes it 's real and we need $ 1 trillion in funding to determine how to stop it " and then spend that on real research.That 's awesome .
And then in 2013 when the public goes " Hey , you took that $ 1 trillion and built a space station and a moon base and a bunch of rockets and solar power stations and telescopes and rovers and stuff , when you were supposed to be preventing the end of the world !
" And NASA can say " What do you think all that stuff was for ?
It worked , did n't it ? " LOL .
Make it so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No NASA should respond with "Yes it's real and we need $1 trillion in funding to determine how to stop it" and then spend that on real research.That's awesome.
And then in 2013 when the public goes "Hey, you took that $1 trillion and built a space station and a moon base and a bunch of rockets and solar power stations and telescopes and rovers and stuff, when you were supposed to be preventing the end of the world!
"And NASA can say "What do you think all that stuff was for?
It worked, didn't it?"LOL.
Make it so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30146144</id>
	<title>Bias of slashdotters...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257101280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Q to the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. crowd: "Could 'doomsday' occur due to as yet unproven [Nibiru, galactic alignment, pole shift/crustal displacement, etc. etc.]?"<br>A: NAH, you stupid idiots... (ha-ha-ha)...</p><p>Q: "What about 'utopia' due to as yet unproven [man-machine convergence, nanotech-driven abundance, genetic manipulation, etc. etc.]?"<br>A: WOOT, SIGN ME UP!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Q to the / .
crowd : " Could 'doomsday ' occur due to as yet unproven [ Nibiru , galactic alignment , pole shift/crustal displacement , etc .
etc. ] ? " A : NAH , you stupid idiots... ( ha-ha-ha ) ...Q : " What about 'utopia ' due to as yet unproven [ man-machine convergence , nanotech-driven abundance , genetic manipulation , etc .
etc. ] ? " A : WOOT , SIGN ME UP !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Q to the /.
crowd: "Could 'doomsday' occur due to as yet unproven [Nibiru, galactic alignment, pole shift/crustal displacement, etc.
etc.]?"A: NAH, you stupid idiots... (ha-ha-ha)...Q: "What about 'utopia' due to as yet unproven [man-machine convergence, nanotech-driven abundance, genetic manipulation, etc.
etc.]?"A: WOOT, SIGN ME UP!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131208</id>
	<title>Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258483680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Holy crap. This surely must be satire or stolen from The Onion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Holy crap .
This surely must be satire or stolen from The Onion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holy crap.
This surely must be satire or stolen from The Onion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30142522</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>PMBjornerud</author>
	<datestamp>1257086040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And NASA can say "What do you think all that stuff was for?  It worked, didn't it?"</p></div><p>Even better: We could hire Bruce Willis and make an action movie about how they prevented the end of the world and cash in afterward as well!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And NASA can say " What do you think all that stuff was for ?
It worked , did n't it ?
" Even better : We could hire Bruce Willis and make an action movie about how they prevented the end of the world and cash in afterward as well !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And NASA can say "What do you think all that stuff was for?
It worked, didn't it?
"Even better: We could hire Bruce Willis and make an action movie about how they prevented the end of the world and cash in afterward as well!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138540</id>
	<title>Re:How Hysteria Repeats ....</title>
	<author>Scott Kevill</author>
	<datestamp>1258470300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I almost thought your typo was intentional.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I almost thought your typo was intentional .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I almost thought your typo was intentional.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30142840</id>
	<title>Concur, especially after 9/11</title>
	<author>LittleGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1257088080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While watching a recent documentary on the World Trade Center, I finally saw the collapse of WTC 7.</p><p>With that footage and the other images of the Towers collapsing, I want to yell at Hollywood, once and for all:</p><p><b>"SKYSCRAPERS ARE NOT DOMINOS!!!"</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While watching a recent documentary on the World Trade Center , I finally saw the collapse of WTC 7.With that footage and the other images of the Towers collapsing , I want to yell at Hollywood , once and for all : " SKYSCRAPERS ARE NOT DOMINOS ! ! !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While watching a recent documentary on the World Trade Center, I finally saw the collapse of WTC 7.With that footage and the other images of the Towers collapsing, I want to yell at Hollywood, once and for all:"SKYSCRAPERS ARE NOT DOMINOS!!!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134670</id>
	<title>The black sport is cover for stargate pro.........</title>
	<author>Joe The Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1258451820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The black sport is cover for stargate pro.........to.......amke.ship./.........notvafssafdkjldsafjdslaadsljfsjdaklajdsajfdskl,</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The black sport is cover for stargate pro.........to.......amke.ship./.........notvafssafdkjldsafjdslaadsljfsjdaklajdsajfdskl,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The black sport is cover for stargate pro.........to.......amke.ship./.........notvafssafdkjldsafjdslaadsljfsjdaklajdsajfdskl,</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131340</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>Ian Alexander</author>
	<datestamp>1258484100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because taxpayers are contemplating suicide over this 2012 nonsense?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because taxpayers are contemplating suicide over this 2012 nonsense ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because taxpayers are contemplating suicide over this 2012 nonsense?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134078</id>
	<title>Re:What if the bible predicted this?</title>
	<author>prefec2</author>
	<datestamp>1258449840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks god there is no definite date for the end of the world in the bible. However, that has not stopped people from believing that the bible contains such information. But still  I would not believe it just on the basis some person 1700 years ago haggled the book together. The same is valid for the Koran. And we all know were the Torah comes from. I would rather go for science here even when science is based on a logic which cannot be proven to be true.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks god there is no definite date for the end of the world in the bible .
However , that has not stopped people from believing that the bible contains such information .
But still I would not believe it just on the basis some person 1700 years ago haggled the book together .
The same is valid for the Koran .
And we all know were the Torah comes from .
I would rather go for science here even when science is based on a logic which can not be proven to be true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks god there is no definite date for the end of the world in the bible.
However, that has not stopped people from believing that the bible contains such information.
But still  I would not believe it just on the basis some person 1700 years ago haggled the book together.
The same is valid for the Koran.
And we all know were the Torah comes from.
I would rather go for science here even when science is based on a logic which cannot be proven to be true.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132810</id>
	<title>Wrong year</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1258488840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>7 pages of comments and Slashdot readers haven't mentioned <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/26/1517242/2012-a-Miscalculation-Actual-Calendar-Ends-2220" title="slashdot.org">"   Science: "2012" a Miscalculation; Actual Calendar Ends 2220"</a> [slashdot.org].  Yeah, there will be panic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>7 pages of comments and Slashdot readers have n't mentioned " Science : " 2012 " a Miscalculation ; Actual Calendar Ends 2220 " [ slashdot.org ] .
Yeah , there will be panic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>7 pages of comments and Slashdot readers haven't mentioned "   Science: "2012" a Miscalculation; Actual Calendar Ends 2220" [slashdot.org].
Yeah, there will be panic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131448</id>
	<title>Why is NASA answering Hollywood Questions?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258484400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is NASA answering these questions some of which surely are just jokes?  Can't they tell the difference?  Why is it NASAs' job to handle this?  They must have better things to do and obviously whatever they thought they were doing trying to educate people HAS NOT WORKED.  Not that educating isn't important, but instead of the symptom, go for the cure?  NASA is not it...</p><p>I've said it before but not here, there should be laws called crimes against reality and the movie should have a disclaimer stating that as entertainment it has no bearing other than appearance to the planet earth and the world we call home.</p><p>When really bad weather happens governors can declare state of emergency to get money.  Old buildings fall down, things must get rebuilt, but what about damage to minds?  Isn't there some sort of rational response that should be made when we become aware of a vast swath of ignorant people?  I think the responses to this movie are quite scary, in fact terrifying.  And if this isn't proof that the US education system only produces reliable tax payers, what else is?</p><p>NASA get back to work!  Your friends in the government are producing meat to pay taxes and won't stop until individuals become property again.  Do your jobs which is managing space and research, not the stupidity of people who eat popcorn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is NASA answering these questions some of which surely are just jokes ?
Ca n't they tell the difference ?
Why is it NASAs ' job to handle this ?
They must have better things to do and obviously whatever they thought they were doing trying to educate people HAS NOT WORKED .
Not that educating is n't important , but instead of the symptom , go for the cure ?
NASA is not it...I 've said it before but not here , there should be laws called crimes against reality and the movie should have a disclaimer stating that as entertainment it has no bearing other than appearance to the planet earth and the world we call home.When really bad weather happens governors can declare state of emergency to get money .
Old buildings fall down , things must get rebuilt , but what about damage to minds ?
Is n't there some sort of rational response that should be made when we become aware of a vast swath of ignorant people ?
I think the responses to this movie are quite scary , in fact terrifying .
And if this is n't proof that the US education system only produces reliable tax payers , what else is ? NASA get back to work !
Your friends in the government are producing meat to pay taxes and wo n't stop until individuals become property again .
Do your jobs which is managing space and research , not the stupidity of people who eat popcorn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is NASA answering these questions some of which surely are just jokes?
Can't they tell the difference?
Why is it NASAs' job to handle this?
They must have better things to do and obviously whatever they thought they were doing trying to educate people HAS NOT WORKED.
Not that educating isn't important, but instead of the symptom, go for the cure?
NASA is not it...I've said it before but not here, there should be laws called crimes against reality and the movie should have a disclaimer stating that as entertainment it has no bearing other than appearance to the planet earth and the world we call home.When really bad weather happens governors can declare state of emergency to get money.
Old buildings fall down, things must get rebuilt, but what about damage to minds?
Isn't there some sort of rational response that should be made when we become aware of a vast swath of ignorant people?
I think the responses to this movie are quite scary, in fact terrifying.
And if this isn't proof that the US education system only produces reliable tax payers, what else is?NASA get back to work!
Your friends in the government are producing meat to pay taxes and won't stop until individuals become property again.
Do your jobs which is managing space and research, not the stupidity of people who eat popcorn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30153434</id>
	<title>Re:Not stupid, just scared - just stupid</title>
	<author>darthwader</author>
	<datestamp>1257102600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I disagree.  Some religion is based on fear, and some is based on hope.  Just like politics.</p><p>Some people get into religion because they want to control and dominate people, and some get into religion because they want to help people and to understand the world.  Just like politics.</p><p>Since I've already got 2 of the 3 dinner-table-conversation killers, I should point out that some people have sex to control and dominate others, and some have sex to celebrate and please others.  Just like politics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I disagree .
Some religion is based on fear , and some is based on hope .
Just like politics.Some people get into religion because they want to control and dominate people , and some get into religion because they want to help people and to understand the world .
Just like politics.Since I 've already got 2 of the 3 dinner-table-conversation killers , I should point out that some people have sex to control and dominate others , and some have sex to celebrate and please others .
Just like politics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I disagree.
Some religion is based on fear, and some is based on hope.
Just like politics.Some people get into religion because they want to control and dominate people, and some get into religion because they want to help people and to understand the world.
Just like politics.Since I've already got 2 of the 3 dinner-table-conversation killers, I should point out that some people have sex to control and dominate others, and some have sex to celebrate and please others.
Just like politics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132412</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>thewiz</author>
	<datestamp>1258487460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>...I never actually considered that people would genuinely fear a cataclysm as depicted in the movie.</i></p><p>Ever hear about a radio broadcast called "War of the Worlds"?  Did you hear about the panic it caused?</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War\_of\_the\_worlds" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War\_of\_the\_worlds</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>Some people will panic just because someone tells them to or they can't distinguish reality from fantasy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...I never actually considered that people would genuinely fear a cataclysm as depicted in the movie.Ever hear about a radio broadcast called " War of the Worlds " ?
Did you hear about the panic it caused ? http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War \ _of \ _the \ _worlds [ wikipedia.org ] Some people will panic just because someone tells them to or they ca n't distinguish reality from fantasy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I never actually considered that people would genuinely fear a cataclysm as depicted in the movie.Ever hear about a radio broadcast called "War of the Worlds"?
Did you hear about the panic it caused?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War\_of\_the\_worlds [wikipedia.org]Some people will panic just because someone tells them to or they can't distinguish reality from fantasy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132234</id>
	<title>Darwin Awards</title>
	<author>aztektum</author>
	<datestamp>1258486920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Modern medicine has kept those that would succumb to disease or illness alive. Now evolution relies on the stupid to make sure the strong survive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Modern medicine has kept those that would succumb to disease or illness alive .
Now evolution relies on the stupid to make sure the strong survive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Modern medicine has kept those that would succumb to disease or illness alive.
Now evolution relies on the stupid to make sure the strong survive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131870</id>
	<title>They have convinced me - the end really is near...</title>
	<author>thisnamestoolong</author>
	<datestamp>1258485720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...human society can't have too much longer when there is an appreciable number of people stupid enough to be driven to suicide by a Roland Emmerich movie.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...human society ca n't have too much longer when there is an appreciable number of people stupid enough to be driven to suicide by a Roland Emmerich movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...human society can't have too much longer when there is an appreciable number of people stupid enough to be driven to suicide by a Roland Emmerich movie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134006</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1258449600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Part of NASA's mandate is education.  They spend most of their time aiming fairly high, but this looks like a great opportunity to dispense some education where it is desperately needed, and has only cost someone ten minutes to write a blog post.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Part of NASA 's mandate is education .
They spend most of their time aiming fairly high , but this looks like a great opportunity to dispense some education where it is desperately needed , and has only cost someone ten minutes to write a blog post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Part of NASA's mandate is education.
They spend most of their time aiming fairly high, but this looks like a great opportunity to dispense some education where it is desperately needed, and has only cost someone ten minutes to write a blog post.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133360</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258490580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No one cares about your job, bro.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No one cares about your job , bro .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one cares about your job, bro.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133222</id>
	<title>Re:Why is NASA answering Hollywood Questions?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258490100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Why is NASA answering these questions some of which surely are just jokes? Can't they tell the difference?"<br>
<br>
I can't tell the difference. I've met people who really believe the earth will end in 2012. None of them talked about offing themselves before the event, but it's not a big stretch of the imagination to see that some people really would, if they believed the world was about to end in a horrible way. I mean, we have historical records of people killing themselves for similar reasons.<br>
<br>
The problem is poe's law. There's no set of beliefs so bizarre that some couldn't hold them, and there's often no way to tell the difference from a single e-mail. Could you really justify letting someone kill themselves *and* their children because they were probably joking?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Why is NASA answering these questions some of which surely are just jokes ?
Ca n't they tell the difference ?
" I ca n't tell the difference .
I 've met people who really believe the earth will end in 2012 .
None of them talked about offing themselves before the event , but it 's not a big stretch of the imagination to see that some people really would , if they believed the world was about to end in a horrible way .
I mean , we have historical records of people killing themselves for similar reasons .
The problem is poe 's law .
There 's no set of beliefs so bizarre that some could n't hold them , and there 's often no way to tell the difference from a single e-mail .
Could you really justify letting someone kill themselves * and * their children because they were probably joking ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Why is NASA answering these questions some of which surely are just jokes?
Can't they tell the difference?
"

I can't tell the difference.
I've met people who really believe the earth will end in 2012.
None of them talked about offing themselves before the event, but it's not a big stretch of the imagination to see that some people really would, if they believed the world was about to end in a horrible way.
I mean, we have historical records of people killing themselves for similar reasons.
The problem is poe's law.
There's no set of beliefs so bizarre that some couldn't hold them, and there's often no way to tell the difference from a single e-mail.
Could you really justify letting someone kill themselves *and* their children because they were probably joking?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132230</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>CrimsonAvenger</author>
	<datestamp>1258486920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Just as a foot note, the Mayan's equate the end of their calendar as like December 31st. The calendar just starts over.</p></div></blockquote><p>Just as a footnote to your footnote, the only character in the movie who relates the end-of-the-world to the Mayans is a complete nutjob (played very well by Woody Harrelson).  The rest of the cast is much too busy running and screaming and dying to worry much about the Mayans' prophetic ability.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just as a foot note , the Mayan 's equate the end of their calendar as like December 31st .
The calendar just starts over.Just as a footnote to your footnote , the only character in the movie who relates the end-of-the-world to the Mayans is a complete nutjob ( played very well by Woody Harrelson ) .
The rest of the cast is much too busy running and screaming and dying to worry much about the Mayans ' prophetic ability .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just as a foot note, the Mayan's equate the end of their calendar as like December 31st.
The calendar just starts over.Just as a footnote to your footnote, the only character in the movie who relates the end-of-the-world to the Mayans is a complete nutjob (played very well by Woody Harrelson).
The rest of the cast is much too busy running and screaming and dying to worry much about the Mayans' prophetic ability.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133794</id>
	<title>In the immortal words of Douglas Adams...</title>
	<author>irussel</author>
	<datestamp>1258449000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't Panic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't Panic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't Panic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30140332</id>
	<title>I've got an idea...</title>
	<author>Samarian Hillbilly</author>
	<datestamp>1258484880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's announce that a spaceship has been built to save the really important people, and anyone who signs on now gets the trip for free...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's announce that a spaceship has been built to save the really important people , and anyone who signs on now gets the trip for free.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's announce that a spaceship has been built to save the really important people, and anyone who signs on now gets the trip for free...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132436</id>
	<title>Re:Not stupid, just scared</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1258487580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>+infinity Insightful.</p><p>Actually, given your signature, make that "+infinity funny".  Gotta balance out that karma somehow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>+ infinity Insightful.Actually , given your signature , make that " + infinity funny " .
Got ta balance out that karma somehow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+infinity Insightful.Actually, given your signature, make that "+infinity funny".
Gotta balance out that karma somehow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132592</id>
	<title>Jeeze</title>
	<author>headhot</author>
	<datestamp>1258488120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Damn Palin supporters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn Palin supporters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn Palin supporters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131786</id>
	<title>Re:Why is NASA answering Hollywood Questions?</title>
	<author>Aladrin</author>
	<datestamp>1258485540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The real crime is that you think it is okay for people to assume movies have any relation to reality to begin with.  ALL movies would have your disclaimer, making it worthless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The real crime is that you think it is okay for people to assume movies have any relation to reality to begin with .
ALL movies would have your disclaimer , making it worthless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real crime is that you think it is okay for people to assume movies have any relation to reality to begin with.
ALL movies would have your disclaimer, making it worthless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133724</id>
	<title>Self-fulfilling Prophecy</title>
	<author>TeethWhitener</author>
	<datestamp>1258448700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've always wondered about the possibility that doomsday predictions would be self-fulfilling.  For instance, some insane person with an inexplicable amount of power (I'm looking at you, Kim Jong-Il) believes wholeheartedly in some end-of-the-world prophecy, and moreover, believes that they're going to have to be the one to set the events in motion.  Then their predictions of terrible things happening on a certain date come true by virtue of the simple fact that they themselves were the initiator.  In the case of this movie (and the 2012 prediction in general), I doubt we'd see anything dire, but who knows?  We've seen tragedies like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Heaven's gate</a> [wikipedia.org] and the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonestown" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Jonestown massacre</a> [wikipedia.org] already, and this one has all the force of a Hollywood endorsement behind it.  I know plenty of posters here are ready to pounce all over this and write it off as mass hysteria or stupidity or whatever, but it kind of leaves me with a sick feeling in my stomach.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've always wondered about the possibility that doomsday predictions would be self-fulfilling .
For instance , some insane person with an inexplicable amount of power ( I 'm looking at you , Kim Jong-Il ) believes wholeheartedly in some end-of-the-world prophecy , and moreover , believes that they 're going to have to be the one to set the events in motion .
Then their predictions of terrible things happening on a certain date come true by virtue of the simple fact that they themselves were the initiator .
In the case of this movie ( and the 2012 prediction in general ) , I doubt we 'd see anything dire , but who knows ?
We 've seen tragedies like Heaven 's gate [ wikipedia.org ] and the Jonestown massacre [ wikipedia.org ] already , and this one has all the force of a Hollywood endorsement behind it .
I know plenty of posters here are ready to pounce all over this and write it off as mass hysteria or stupidity or whatever , but it kind of leaves me with a sick feeling in my stomach .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've always wondered about the possibility that doomsday predictions would be self-fulfilling.
For instance, some insane person with an inexplicable amount of power (I'm looking at you, Kim Jong-Il) believes wholeheartedly in some end-of-the-world prophecy, and moreover, believes that they're going to have to be the one to set the events in motion.
Then their predictions of terrible things happening on a certain date come true by virtue of the simple fact that they themselves were the initiator.
In the case of this movie (and the 2012 prediction in general), I doubt we'd see anything dire, but who knows?
We've seen tragedies like Heaven's gate [wikipedia.org] and the Jonestown massacre [wikipedia.org] already, and this one has all the force of a Hollywood endorsement behind it.
I know plenty of posters here are ready to pounce all over this and write it off as mass hysteria or stupidity or whatever, but it kind of leaves me with a sick feeling in my stomach.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131894</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258485780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext> Yes it's only a movie, but judging by the reaction, it's more convincing than "An Inconvenient Truth".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes it 's only a movie , but judging by the reaction , it 's more convincing than " An Inconvenient Truth " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Yes it's only a movie, but judging by the reaction, it's more convincing than "An Inconvenient Truth".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132188</id>
	<title>Re:They have convinced me - the end really is near</title>
	<author>mea37</author>
	<datestamp>1258486800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, two thigns.</p><p>1) Just because you weren't around to see the stupid thigns humans have done in the past, doesn't mean that they're somehow less stupid than the stupid thigns we're doing today.  A vocal but very small minority could topple civilization, but not by means of self-destructive ignorance and worry.</p><p>2) The 2012 myth is not reaction to the movie; the movie is reaction to the 2012 myth.  The 2012 myth takes many forms, and each of those forms have some elements that resonate wtih some people.  The movie has magnified and publicized that resonance to a larger audience, although even so the vast majority do understand it to be fiction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , two thigns.1 ) Just because you were n't around to see the stupid thigns humans have done in the past , does n't mean that they 're somehow less stupid than the stupid thigns we 're doing today .
A vocal but very small minority could topple civilization , but not by means of self-destructive ignorance and worry.2 ) The 2012 myth is not reaction to the movie ; the movie is reaction to the 2012 myth .
The 2012 myth takes many forms , and each of those forms have some elements that resonate wtih some people .
The movie has magnified and publicized that resonance to a larger audience , although even so the vast majority do understand it to be fiction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, two thigns.1) Just because you weren't around to see the stupid thigns humans have done in the past, doesn't mean that they're somehow less stupid than the stupid thigns we're doing today.
A vocal but very small minority could topple civilization, but not by means of self-destructive ignorance and worry.2) The 2012 myth is not reaction to the movie; the movie is reaction to the 2012 myth.
The 2012 myth takes many forms, and each of those forms have some elements that resonate wtih some people.
The movie has magnified and publicized that resonance to a larger audience, although even so the vast majority do understand it to be fiction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132660</id>
	<title>Re:This is part of NASA's purvey.</title>
	<author>Insightfill</author>
	<datestamp>1258488300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Ignorance is not stupidity. NASA has addressed the ignorance. Good for them.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Repeated ignorance, is stupidity, however.  Falling for a "419 scam" once, is ignorance.  Falling for a second is stupidity.  "Ignorance" is "doesn't know", while "stupidity" is "won't know."</p><p>
Or, as our former president once said: "Fool me once..."</p><p>
I'm glad NASA is looking at this, but saddened that they have to.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ignorance is not stupidity .
NASA has addressed the ignorance .
Good for them .
Repeated ignorance , is stupidity , however .
Falling for a " 419 scam " once , is ignorance .
Falling for a second is stupidity .
" Ignorance " is " does n't know " , while " stupidity " is " wo n't know .
" Or , as our former president once said : " Fool me once... " I 'm glad NASA is looking at this , but saddened that they have to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ignorance is not stupidity.
NASA has addressed the ignorance.
Good for them.
Repeated ignorance, is stupidity, however.
Falling for a "419 scam" once, is ignorance.
Falling for a second is stupidity.
"Ignorance" is "doesn't know", while "stupidity" is "won't know.
"
Or, as our former president once said: "Fool me once..."
I'm glad NASA is looking at this, but saddened that they have to.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131810</id>
	<title>Ridiculous and impossible</title>
	<author>PirateBlis</author>
	<datestamp>1258485600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>2012 isn't going to end the world and wipeout man-kind. If it did, our robotic overlords would have no one to control, and that's just silly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>2012 is n't going to end the world and wipeout man-kind .
If it did , our robotic overlords would have no one to control , and that 's just silly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2012 isn't going to end the world and wipeout man-kind.
If it did, our robotic overlords would have no one to control, and that's just silly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131558</id>
	<title>Re:Let them do it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258484820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>not "nym."  <a href="http://www.nimh.nih.gov/" title="nih.gov" rel="nofollow">NIMH</a> [nih.gov].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>not " nym .
" NIMH [ nih.gov ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not "nym.
"  NIMH [nih.gov].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136142</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>Ant P.</author>
	<datestamp>1258457160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Along with blowing up Yellowstone and other sundry destructions,</p></div><p>That reminded me... I wonder if someone's going to make a movie about the Yellowstone supervolcano that's supposedly overdue to explode and choke everyone to death with a planetwide dust cloud. Unlike this, that one's got a bit of scientific weight behind it...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Along with blowing up Yellowstone and other sundry destructions,That reminded me... I wonder if someone 's going to make a movie about the Yellowstone supervolcano that 's supposedly overdue to explode and choke everyone to death with a planetwide dust cloud .
Unlike this , that one 's got a bit of scientific weight behind it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Along with blowing up Yellowstone and other sundry destructions,That reminded me... I wonder if someone's going to make a movie about the Yellowstone supervolcano that's supposedly overdue to explode and choke everyone to death with a planetwide dust cloud.
Unlike this, that one's got a bit of scientific weight behind it...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30139278</id>
	<title>Re:Cinematic Neurosis</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258476120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, but fearing sharks is reasonable in Kansas.  I KNOW I saw land sharks on SNL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but fearing sharks is reasonable in Kansas .
I KNOW I saw land sharks on SNL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but fearing sharks is reasonable in Kansas.
I KNOW I saw land sharks on SNL.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131610</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258485000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, you don't. The case with children is difficult to handle, but for the pets, tell them to put it down now. Anyone this dumb is likely to cause the poor animal quite a bit of suffering through sheer stupidity sooner or later. For the an hero types, by all means let them.</p><p>The children are also in trouble if they are raised by these morons, but killing the <i>children</i> is hardly the solution. Maybe you should recommend that they name their children (assuming boys) Sue and turn them loose, so that they'll be tough enough to survive the end of the world in three years (what you tell them), or at least to beat up their old man when nothing happens (what you're thinking).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , you do n't .
The case with children is difficult to handle , but for the pets , tell them to put it down now .
Anyone this dumb is likely to cause the poor animal quite a bit of suffering through sheer stupidity sooner or later .
For the an hero types , by all means let them.The children are also in trouble if they are raised by these morons , but killing the children is hardly the solution .
Maybe you should recommend that they name their children ( assuming boys ) Sue and turn them loose , so that they 'll be tough enough to survive the end of the world in three years ( what you tell them ) , or at least to beat up their old man when nothing happens ( what you 're thinking ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, you don't.
The case with children is difficult to handle, but for the pets, tell them to put it down now.
Anyone this dumb is likely to cause the poor animal quite a bit of suffering through sheer stupidity sooner or later.
For the an hero types, by all means let them.The children are also in trouble if they are raised by these morons, but killing the children is hardly the solution.
Maybe you should recommend that they name their children (assuming boys) Sue and turn them loose, so that they'll be tough enough to survive the end of the world in three years (what you tell them), or at least to beat up their old man when nothing happens (what you're thinking).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30142460</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>MiniMike</author>
	<datestamp>1257085560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You must be confusing this with the next Presidential election race?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You must be confusing this with the next Presidential election race ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must be confusing this with the next Presidential election race?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133656</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258448460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Panic-mongers do cause demonstrable harm and in the case of the LHC black-hole lies are known to have precipiated at least one death (a teenage girl who committed suicide.)</p></div><p>Oh, my god, there are panic-mongers among us? What are we to do? How will we handle them? We're doomed!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Panic-mongers do cause demonstrable harm and in the case of the LHC black-hole lies are known to have precipiated at least one death ( a teenage girl who committed suicide .
) Oh , my god , there are panic-mongers among us ?
What are we to do ?
How will we handle them ?
We 're doomed !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Panic-mongers do cause demonstrable harm and in the case of the LHC black-hole lies are known to have precipiated at least one death (a teenage girl who committed suicide.
)Oh, my god, there are panic-mongers among us?
What are we to do?
How will we handle them?
We're doomed!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30142498</id>
	<title>2012: The Gnu Collective Consciousness (GCC)</title>
	<author>sakari</author>
	<datestamp>1257085920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. GNU became conscious:</p><p><a href="http://lgo900.wordpress.com/2009/05/09/2012-the-gnu-collective-consciousness/" title="wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://lgo900.wordpress.com/2009/05/09/2012-the-gnu-collective-consciousness/</a> [wordpress.com]</p><p>This is my take on the 2012 hysteria looked through the glasses of a geek (I don't actually wear glasses, though). Shameless plug, but so is this article too for the movie.<br>A scenario like this could happen. But seriously, I think 2012 is just a marker in our fate that starts a new era of thinking and conscious working towards unity between humans. This is what I'm working towards, and I know a lot of other people are doing the same thing.</p><p>Creating fear in the masses has long been the way of Hollywood and those pulling the strings between the scenes. Don't believe the hype, think for yourselves. Don't let negative opinions of others affect you, don't believe the movie industry who just want your money.</p><p>We, and you, create the future. Let's make it a bright one, ruled by compassion and love, not fear and self loathing. Thank you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if .. GNU became conscious : http : //lgo900.wordpress.com/2009/05/09/2012-the-gnu-collective-consciousness/ [ wordpress.com ] This is my take on the 2012 hysteria looked through the glasses of a geek ( I do n't actually wear glasses , though ) .
Shameless plug , but so is this article too for the movie.A scenario like this could happen .
But seriously , I think 2012 is just a marker in our fate that starts a new era of thinking and conscious working towards unity between humans .
This is what I 'm working towards , and I know a lot of other people are doing the same thing.Creating fear in the masses has long been the way of Hollywood and those pulling the strings between the scenes .
Do n't believe the hype , think for yourselves .
Do n't let negative opinions of others affect you , do n't believe the movie industry who just want your money.We , and you , create the future .
Let 's make it a bright one , ruled by compassion and love , not fear and self loathing .
Thank you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if .. GNU became conscious:http://lgo900.wordpress.com/2009/05/09/2012-the-gnu-collective-consciousness/ [wordpress.com]This is my take on the 2012 hysteria looked through the glasses of a geek (I don't actually wear glasses, though).
Shameless plug, but so is this article too for the movie.A scenario like this could happen.
But seriously, I think 2012 is just a marker in our fate that starts a new era of thinking and conscious working towards unity between humans.
This is what I'm working towards, and I know a lot of other people are doing the same thing.Creating fear in the masses has long been the way of Hollywood and those pulling the strings between the scenes.
Don't believe the hype, think for yourselves.
Don't let negative opinions of others affect you, don't believe the movie industry who just want your money.We, and you, create the future.
Let's make it a bright one, ruled by compassion and love, not fear and self loathing.
Thank you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30135806</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>\_Sprocket\_</author>
	<datestamp>1258455540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are landing on asteroids so that they don't land at home.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are landing on asteroids so that they do n't land at home .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are landing on asteroids so that they don't land at home.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131620</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>raddan</author>
	<datestamp>1258485060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not the beeps that get us... we can live with that... it's...
<br> <br>
ENHANCE
<br> <br>
For the love of God, if I see that again... the Earth *will* end.  BTW, anyone have an earliest reference for this atrocious meme?  So far, my brother and I have identified Patriot Games as the earliest reference we could find...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not the beeps that get us... we can live with that... it 's.. . ENHANCE For the love of God , if I see that again... the Earth * will * end .
BTW , anyone have an earliest reference for this atrocious meme ?
So far , my brother and I have identified Patriot Games as the earliest reference we could find.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not the beeps that get us... we can live with that... it's...
 
ENHANCE
 
For the love of God, if I see that again... the Earth *will* end.
BTW, anyone have an earliest reference for this atrocious meme?
So far, my brother and I have identified Patriot Games as the earliest reference we could find...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133518</id>
	<title>Re:What if the bible predicted this?</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1258491240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is no calendar that predicted the end of the world in 2012.  There's nothing to "believe", even if you are of the stripe that likes to believe in ghosts, spirits, boogeymen, faeries, magical trolls, or Gods.</p><p>Oh, you mean the Mayan Calendar ending?  Or, more accurately, the Mesoamerican calendar that the Mayans adopted reaching the same point at which the Mayans believed the 4th Earth was created (the one that finally worked) the last time around on the Long Count?</p><p>So the Mayan calendar will change from 12.19.19.79 to 13.0.0.0.  Then about 400 years later, it'll be 14.0.0.0.  Those among you good in math will see a pattern developing.  The Mayans would probably see this as a cause for mass celebration, much like us celebrating the new year in 2000 differently from, say, 1990.  It's a big change in numbers.  It's a whole new b'ak'tun, baby!  And there are 16 of them.</p><p>But the Mayans/Mesoamericans did not have a destruction myth surrounding 13.0.0.0.  That was a recent addition by a few New Age cults, and is being marketed by Hollywierd to sell asses in seats.</p><p>But, beware!  We start a new Long Count cycle on Oct 12 4772!  Then the implied leading zero will change to a one, and the year will be 1.0.0.0.0.  Now THAT'S going to be an awesome party!  Or, more likely, it'll just be 0.0.0.0 again.  Then any computers programmed in the Mayan calendar won't know what piktun it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no calendar that predicted the end of the world in 2012 .
There 's nothing to " believe " , even if you are of the stripe that likes to believe in ghosts , spirits , boogeymen , faeries , magical trolls , or Gods.Oh , you mean the Mayan Calendar ending ?
Or , more accurately , the Mesoamerican calendar that the Mayans adopted reaching the same point at which the Mayans believed the 4th Earth was created ( the one that finally worked ) the last time around on the Long Count ? So the Mayan calendar will change from 12.19.19.79 to 13.0.0.0 .
Then about 400 years later , it 'll be 14.0.0.0 .
Those among you good in math will see a pattern developing .
The Mayans would probably see this as a cause for mass celebration , much like us celebrating the new year in 2000 differently from , say , 1990 .
It 's a big change in numbers .
It 's a whole new b'ak'tun , baby !
And there are 16 of them.But the Mayans/Mesoamericans did not have a destruction myth surrounding 13.0.0.0 .
That was a recent addition by a few New Age cults , and is being marketed by Hollywierd to sell asses in seats.But , beware !
We start a new Long Count cycle on Oct 12 4772 !
Then the implied leading zero will change to a one , and the year will be 1.0.0.0.0 .
Now THAT 'S going to be an awesome party !
Or , more likely , it 'll just be 0.0.0.0 again .
Then any computers programmed in the Mayan calendar wo n't know what piktun it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no calendar that predicted the end of the world in 2012.
There's nothing to "believe", even if you are of the stripe that likes to believe in ghosts, spirits, boogeymen, faeries, magical trolls, or Gods.Oh, you mean the Mayan Calendar ending?
Or, more accurately, the Mesoamerican calendar that the Mayans adopted reaching the same point at which the Mayans believed the 4th Earth was created (the one that finally worked) the last time around on the Long Count?So the Mayan calendar will change from 12.19.19.79 to 13.0.0.0.
Then about 400 years later, it'll be 14.0.0.0.
Those among you good in math will see a pattern developing.
The Mayans would probably see this as a cause for mass celebration, much like us celebrating the new year in 2000 differently from, say, 1990.
It's a big change in numbers.
It's a whole new b'ak'tun, baby!
And there are 16 of them.But the Mayans/Mesoamericans did not have a destruction myth surrounding 13.0.0.0.
That was a recent addition by a few New Age cults, and is being marketed by Hollywierd to sell asses in seats.But, beware!
We start a new Long Count cycle on Oct 12 4772!
Then the implied leading zero will change to a one, and the year will be 1.0.0.0.0.
Now THAT'S going to be an awesome party!
Or, more likely, it'll just be 0.0.0.0 again.
Then any computers programmed in the Mayan calendar won't know what piktun it is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133002</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>shrtcircuit</author>
	<datestamp>1258489500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"That's a ridiculously low amount of money for an agency that's charged with a major component of our future and probably the whole future of the Earth and its inhabitants."<br><br>The scale compared to defense spending implies the amount of resources necessary just to keep humanity from destroying itself, before NASA can keep nature from doing it for us.<br><br>Funny part is I give NASA better odds, though the people in charge of our world's various militaries also have a lot of personal profit to gain and lose by ensuring general continuity of human inhabitance, so they aren't as likely to push the "annihilate" button as some might think.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" That 's a ridiculously low amount of money for an agency that 's charged with a major component of our future and probably the whole future of the Earth and its inhabitants .
" The scale compared to defense spending implies the amount of resources necessary just to keep humanity from destroying itself , before NASA can keep nature from doing it for us.Funny part is I give NASA better odds , though the people in charge of our world 's various militaries also have a lot of personal profit to gain and lose by ensuring general continuity of human inhabitance , so they are n't as likely to push the " annihilate " button as some might think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"That's a ridiculously low amount of money for an agency that's charged with a major component of our future and probably the whole future of the Earth and its inhabitants.
"The scale compared to defense spending implies the amount of resources necessary just to keep humanity from destroying itself, before NASA can keep nature from doing it for us.Funny part is I give NASA better odds, though the people in charge of our world's various militaries also have a lot of personal profit to gain and lose by ensuring general continuity of human inhabitance, so they aren't as likely to push the "annihilate" button as some might think.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133844</id>
	<title>Why are you still talking?</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1258449120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Kill yourself now, before its too late!"</p><p>alternative ending:</p><p>"Why bother, we are all gonna die in 2012!"</p><p>alternate alternate ending:</p><p>"Well its 2009, and the world ends in 2012, so if we take one number, 2009 and subtract it from 2012 you get the number 3. Its called math. So you should kill yourself in about 3 years. If you want to get really accurate, you could look at a calender and see what month it is, and what day, and really work out exactly when to do it! Either way, it isn't for awhile and your probably likely to die drowning looking up during a rain storm before that, so leave me alone..."</p><p>alternate alternate alternate ending:</p><p>"Don't worry about it we will be hit by a meteor or a comet long before then!"</p><p>As an aside I have also heard that this Mayan 2012 prediction is all buffoonery. They Mayans thought their the world would end just like we think the world ends after December. It was their calender for keeping track of time. I think it was implied that you just restart the calender once the cycle is over. Perhaps it is so implisit that they didn't feel the need to explain this just the same we don't put a sticker on every calender we ever make that says "Not to worry, world not ending, new calender next year!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Kill yourself now , before its too late !
" alternative ending : " Why bother , we are all gon na die in 2012 !
" alternate alternate ending : " Well its 2009 , and the world ends in 2012 , so if we take one number , 2009 and subtract it from 2012 you get the number 3 .
Its called math .
So you should kill yourself in about 3 years .
If you want to get really accurate , you could look at a calender and see what month it is , and what day , and really work out exactly when to do it !
Either way , it is n't for awhile and your probably likely to die drowning looking up during a rain storm before that , so leave me alone... " alternate alternate alternate ending : " Do n't worry about it we will be hit by a meteor or a comet long before then !
" As an aside I have also heard that this Mayan 2012 prediction is all buffoonery .
They Mayans thought their the world would end just like we think the world ends after December .
It was their calender for keeping track of time .
I think it was implied that you just restart the calender once the cycle is over .
Perhaps it is so implisit that they did n't feel the need to explain this just the same we do n't put a sticker on every calender we ever make that says " Not to worry , world not ending , new calender next year !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Kill yourself now, before its too late!
"alternative ending:"Why bother, we are all gonna die in 2012!
"alternate alternate ending:"Well its 2009, and the world ends in 2012, so if we take one number, 2009 and subtract it from 2012 you get the number 3.
Its called math.
So you should kill yourself in about 3 years.
If you want to get really accurate, you could look at a calender and see what month it is, and what day, and really work out exactly when to do it!
Either way, it isn't for awhile and your probably likely to die drowning looking up during a rain storm before that, so leave me alone..."alternate alternate alternate ending:"Don't worry about it we will be hit by a meteor or a comet long before then!
"As an aside I have also heard that this Mayan 2012 prediction is all buffoonery.
They Mayans thought their the world would end just like we think the world ends after December.
It was their calender for keeping track of time.
I think it was implied that you just restart the calender once the cycle is over.
Perhaps it is so implisit that they didn't feel the need to explain this just the same we don't put a sticker on every calender we ever make that says "Not to worry, world not ending, new calender next year!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138156</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258467300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unless Palin gets elected.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless Palin gets elected .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless Palin gets elected.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132794</id>
	<title>Re:How Histery Repeats ....</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1258488780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was thinking more about the 1910 appearance of Halley Comet. Very similar dire predictions, mass hysteria, and attempts by the scientific community to calm fears. I am sure all the previous appearances were the same too, but the 1910 showing was very well documented.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was thinking more about the 1910 appearance of Halley Comet .
Very similar dire predictions , mass hysteria , and attempts by the scientific community to calm fears .
I am sure all the previous appearances were the same too , but the 1910 showing was very well documented .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was thinking more about the 1910 appearance of Halley Comet.
Very similar dire predictions, mass hysteria, and attempts by the scientific community to calm fears.
I am sure all the previous appearances were the same too, but the 1910 showing was very well documented.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131944</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1258485960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about the teletype sounds while things are being displayed on a CRT? You must have left those in. How can we tell that it's a computer display without the teletype sounds? I'm always confused using my PC because it refuses to make those necessary sounds. I always suspect that there's just a midget hiding in that little box.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about the teletype sounds while things are being displayed on a CRT ?
You must have left those in .
How can we tell that it 's a computer display without the teletype sounds ?
I 'm always confused using my PC because it refuses to make those necessary sounds .
I always suspect that there 's just a midget hiding in that little box .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about the teletype sounds while things are being displayed on a CRT?
You must have left those in.
How can we tell that it's a computer display without the teletype sounds?
I'm always confused using my PC because it refuses to make those necessary sounds.
I always suspect that there's just a midget hiding in that little box.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131930</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>mamer-retrogamer</author>
	<datestamp>1258485900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it make me a bad person if my immediate reaction to someone who would respond this way is to omit the "or yourself" part?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it make me a bad person if my immediate reaction to someone who would respond this way is to omit the " or yourself " part ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it make me a bad person if my immediate reaction to someone who would respond this way is to omit the "or yourself" part?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136254</id>
	<title>Re:How History Repeats ....</title>
	<author>neonsignal</author>
	<datestamp>1258457520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's no excuse at all for 2012.</p></div><p>
maybe they forgot to stay and read the credits...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's no excuse at all for 2012 . maybe they forgot to stay and read the credits.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's no excuse at all for 2012.
maybe they forgot to stay and read the credits...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30140772</id>
	<title>I have an answer for you</title>
	<author>marqs</author>
	<datestamp>1257107520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i> I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog. When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?" And I don't know how to answer those questions.'"</i>

Tell them to go ahead as planned. A few less nutcases to worry about for the rest of us<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had one last week from a person who said , " I 'm so scared , my only friend is my little dog .
When should I put it to sleep so it wo n't suffer ?
" And I do n't know how to answer those questions .
' " Tell them to go ahead as planned .
A few less nutcases to worry about for the rest of us ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog.
When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?
" And I don't know how to answer those questions.
'"

Tell them to go ahead as planned.
A few less nutcases to worry about for the rest of us ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134402</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>JesusOfNazareth</author>
	<datestamp>1258450980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed, I think it is (was?) mandatory for US federal employees at a certain level to respond to any citizen correspondence, no matter how zany it might be.  Remember my father way back when working as a physicist for the DOE having to respond to similar questions about particle colliders causing the end of the world or postulations about the flood in the bible somehow causing the hole in the ozone layer.  There were some true<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/facepalm zingers he got, none of which I can remember now.  Of course he didn't have the luxury of the internet or a blog site to post a mass-response, at the very best he had email or snail mail with which to respond to inquiries.</p><p>Being a scientist working for the government always got you weird requests it seemed, at least for him.  Maybe it's not limited to government scientists.</p><p>After his retiring I remember either the History Channel or the Discovery Channel approached him about interviewing him as an expert for a show about atomic bomb tests causing cancer in John Wayne or something to that effect.  He declined figuring they'd just make him look like a fool.  Keep meaning to watch that program just to see what they came up with, assuming they followed through with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed , I think it is ( was ?
) mandatory for US federal employees at a certain level to respond to any citizen correspondence , no matter how zany it might be .
Remember my father way back when working as a physicist for the DOE having to respond to similar questions about particle colliders causing the end of the world or postulations about the flood in the bible somehow causing the hole in the ozone layer .
There were some true /facepalm zingers he got , none of which I can remember now .
Of course he did n't have the luxury of the internet or a blog site to post a mass-response , at the very best he had email or snail mail with which to respond to inquiries.Being a scientist working for the government always got you weird requests it seemed , at least for him .
Maybe it 's not limited to government scientists.After his retiring I remember either the History Channel or the Discovery Channel approached him about interviewing him as an expert for a show about atomic bomb tests causing cancer in John Wayne or something to that effect .
He declined figuring they 'd just make him look like a fool .
Keep meaning to watch that program just to see what they came up with , assuming they followed through with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed, I think it is (was?
) mandatory for US federal employees at a certain level to respond to any citizen correspondence, no matter how zany it might be.
Remember my father way back when working as a physicist for the DOE having to respond to similar questions about particle colliders causing the end of the world or postulations about the flood in the bible somehow causing the hole in the ozone layer.
There were some true /facepalm zingers he got, none of which I can remember now.
Of course he didn't have the luxury of the internet or a blog site to post a mass-response, at the very best he had email or snail mail with which to respond to inquiries.Being a scientist working for the government always got you weird requests it seemed, at least for him.
Maybe it's not limited to government scientists.After his retiring I remember either the History Channel or the Discovery Channel approached him about interviewing him as an expert for a show about atomic bomb tests causing cancer in John Wayne or something to that effect.
He declined figuring they'd just make him look like a fool.
Keep meaning to watch that program just to see what they came up with, assuming they followed through with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134020</id>
	<title>Why prevent darwin from doing his job?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258449660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't understand this quote:<br>'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide. I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves. I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog. When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?" And I don't know how to answer those questions.'"</p><p>What's wrong with letting Darwin deal with stupid peoples?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand this quote : 'I 've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide .
I 've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves .
I had one last week from a person who said , " I 'm so scared , my only friend is my little dog .
When should I put it to sleep so it wo n't suffer ?
" And I do n't know how to answer those questions .
' " What 's wrong with letting Darwin deal with stupid peoples ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand this quote:'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide.
I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves.
I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog.
When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?
" And I don't know how to answer those questions.
'"What's wrong with letting Darwin deal with stupid peoples?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131744</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>b4dc0d3r</author>
	<datestamp>1258485360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I won't see the movie immediately, but I'll pre-emptively say that the beeps were entirely unnecessary, inappropriate, or plain impossible, and no programmer worth their salt would make an interface that noisy.  But I'm sure you were just following orders.  You know who else was just following orders?</p><p>Seriously, I'm going to see it just for the beeps now, cos I'm intrigued how an informed person would accomplish this task as opposed to the mindless goons who think they know how computers work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wo n't see the movie immediately , but I 'll pre-emptively say that the beeps were entirely unnecessary , inappropriate , or plain impossible , and no programmer worth their salt would make an interface that noisy .
But I 'm sure you were just following orders .
You know who else was just following orders ? Seriously , I 'm going to see it just for the beeps now , cos I 'm intrigued how an informed person would accomplish this task as opposed to the mindless goons who think they know how computers work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I won't see the movie immediately, but I'll pre-emptively say that the beeps were entirely unnecessary, inappropriate, or plain impossible, and no programmer worth their salt would make an interface that noisy.
But I'm sure you were just following orders.
You know who else was just following orders?Seriously, I'm going to see it just for the beeps now, cos I'm intrigued how an informed person would accomplish this task as opposed to the mindless goons who think they know how computers work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132216</id>
	<title>well...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258486860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are the same kind of people who believe in Jesus and Santa Clause xD</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are the same kind of people who believe in Jesus and Santa Clause xD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are the same kind of people who believe in Jesus and Santa Clause xD</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30142346</id>
	<title>At least they will clean themselves out.</title>
	<author>stickystyle</author>
	<datestamp>1257084720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With any luck these people will off themselves prior to 2012 because they are flat out nuts.  The ones that totally buying into hysteria but not nuts enough to kill themselves for fear of an event will hopefully fall into a deep depression and kill themselves when they realize they are dip-shits when the Gregorian new year rolls around.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With any luck these people will off themselves prior to 2012 because they are flat out nuts .
The ones that totally buying into hysteria but not nuts enough to kill themselves for fear of an event will hopefully fall into a deep depression and kill themselves when they realize they are dip-shits when the Gregorian new year rolls around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With any luck these people will off themselves prior to 2012 because they are flat out nuts.
The ones that totally buying into hysteria but not nuts enough to kill themselves for fear of an event will hopefully fall into a deep depression and kill themselves when they realize they are dip-shits when the Gregorian new year rolls around.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136306</id>
	<title>The New Dark Ages...</title>
	<author>ConceptJunkie</author>
	<datestamp>1258457700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know plenty of people laugh at the superstitions of people in the Dark Ages, but science as we know it, didn't exist then.  I mean Aristotle had some great ideas, but there was little or nothing to take the place of raw superstition until about the 13th or 14th century (at least in the West).</p><p>But what is peoples' excuse today?  How is it that people who presumably graduated from the American educational system are no better off than some dirt-farming peasant from barbarian times?  Things weren't always this bad.  If I had the choice of hiring someone with a high school education from 1909 or someone with a high school education from 2009, I'd choose the 1909 person, and 90\% of the time I'd be better off.</p><p>But of course or education system is fine, it just needs more money thrown at it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know plenty of people laugh at the superstitions of people in the Dark Ages , but science as we know it , did n't exist then .
I mean Aristotle had some great ideas , but there was little or nothing to take the place of raw superstition until about the 13th or 14th century ( at least in the West ) .But what is peoples ' excuse today ?
How is it that people who presumably graduated from the American educational system are no better off than some dirt-farming peasant from barbarian times ?
Things were n't always this bad .
If I had the choice of hiring someone with a high school education from 1909 or someone with a high school education from 2009 , I 'd choose the 1909 person , and 90 \ % of the time I 'd be better off.But of course or education system is fine , it just needs more money thrown at it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know plenty of people laugh at the superstitions of people in the Dark Ages, but science as we know it, didn't exist then.
I mean Aristotle had some great ideas, but there was little or nothing to take the place of raw superstition until about the 13th or 14th century (at least in the West).But what is peoples' excuse today?
How is it that people who presumably graduated from the American educational system are no better off than some dirt-farming peasant from barbarian times?
Things weren't always this bad.
If I had the choice of hiring someone with a high school education from 1909 or someone with a high school education from 2009, I'd choose the 1909 person, and 90\% of the time I'd be better off.But of course or education system is fine, it just needs more money thrown at it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134426</id>
	<title>How many people are actually worried?</title>
	<author>Dirtside</author>
	<datestamp>1258450980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been noticing a lot of these "NASA Calms 2012 Fears" articles in the last few days, enough that it makes it sound like there's more of a story here than I think there really is. The real question is, how many people are actually worried about this? I'm guessing that it's a tiny number, and probably what happened is, a statistical blip caused a few of the crazier ones to contact NASA. So then he posts on the blog about it, and for some reason a lot of places pick up the story.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been noticing a lot of these " NASA Calms 2012 Fears " articles in the last few days , enough that it makes it sound like there 's more of a story here than I think there really is .
The real question is , how many people are actually worried about this ?
I 'm guessing that it 's a tiny number , and probably what happened is , a statistical blip caused a few of the crazier ones to contact NASA .
So then he posts on the blog about it , and for some reason a lot of places pick up the story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been noticing a lot of these "NASA Calms 2012 Fears" articles in the last few days, enough that it makes it sound like there's more of a story here than I think there really is.
The real question is, how many people are actually worried about this?
I'm guessing that it's a tiny number, and probably what happened is, a statistical blip caused a few of the crazier ones to contact NASA.
So then he posts on the blog about it, and for some reason a lot of places pick up the story.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131518</id>
	<title>It's easy, I'd have no problem with it at all ;-)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258484640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And I don't know how to answer those questions.</p></div><p>Let me help you out on this one: "It's a fucking movie you FUCKING IDIOT! Fiction, make-believe, pretend. You know what fiction is, right? YOU FUCKING IDIOT!"</p><p>You may laugh, but I really do think that in most cases that would reassure the person asking the question!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And I do n't know how to answer those questions.Let me help you out on this one : " It 's a fucking movie you FUCKING IDIOT !
Fiction , make-believe , pretend .
You know what fiction is , right ?
YOU FUCKING IDIOT !
" You may laugh , but I really do think that in most cases that would reassure the person asking the question !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I don't know how to answer those questions.Let me help you out on this one: "It's a fucking movie you FUCKING IDIOT!
Fiction, make-believe, pretend.
You know what fiction is, right?
YOU FUCKING IDIOT!
"You may laugh, but I really do think that in most cases that would reassure the person asking the question!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134044</id>
	<title>Re:What if the bible predicted this?</title>
	<author>bigdavex</author>
	<datestamp>1258449720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jehovah's\_Witnesses#Criticism\_and\_controversies" title="wikipedia.org">Jehovah's Witnesses</a> [wikipedia.org] (wikipedia)<br><b>Doctrinal criticisms</b><br>The Watch Tower Society has made various predictions about the coming of Armageddon and Christ's millennial reign, raising expectations of their imminence in the years leading up to 1914, 1925, and 1975.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jehovah 's Witnesses [ wikipedia.org ] ( wikipedia ) Doctrinal criticismsThe Watch Tower Society has made various predictions about the coming of Armageddon and Christ 's millennial reign , raising expectations of their imminence in the years leading up to 1914 , 1925 , and 1975 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jehovah's Witnesses [wikipedia.org] (wikipedia)Doctrinal criticismsThe Watch Tower Society has made various predictions about the coming of Armageddon and Christ's millennial reign, raising expectations of their imminence in the years leading up to 1914, 1925, and 1975.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30135378</id>
	<title>NOW!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258454100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>FTFA: <i>'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide. I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves. I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog. When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?" And I don't know how to answer those questions.'</i> <br> <br>This is so easy to answer.  The answer is <b>now</b>!  Go ahead and off yourself and your little dog.  You're just helping the rest of us by reducing the amount of 'stupid' in the world.</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTFA : 'I 've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide .
I 've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves .
I had one last week from a person who said , " I 'm so scared , my only friend is my little dog .
When should I put it to sleep so it wo n't suffer ?
" And I do n't know how to answer those questions .
' This is so easy to answer .
The answer is now !
Go ahead and off yourself and your little dog .
You 're just helping the rest of us by reducing the amount of 'stupid ' in the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTFA: 'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide.
I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves.
I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog.
When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?
" And I don't know how to answer those questions.
'  This is so easy to answer.
The answer is now!
Go ahead and off yourself and your little dog.
You're just helping the rest of us by reducing the amount of 'stupid' in the world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131414</id>
	<title>Two Words</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258484340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Natural Selection".</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Natural Selection " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Natural Selection".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134810</id>
	<title>Darwin evolution at its best....</title>
	<author>pjr.cc</author>
	<datestamp>1258452240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide" - seriously, if you believe 2012 (or any movie really) enough to even say something like that, the world is probably better off without you. Thats really just plain stupidity. "A movie said the world might end in a little over 2 years, i better kill myself now" honest to god, your just wasting valuable air useful people could be breathing. But to read this, "I've had two from women contemplating killing their children" is really sad and somewhat supprising that people this dumb actually figured out how to breed (perhaps im assuming too much?).</p><p>Is the world really getting as stupid as it appears to be?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide " - seriously , if you believe 2012 ( or any movie really ) enough to even say something like that , the world is probably better off without you .
Thats really just plain stupidity .
" A movie said the world might end in a little over 2 years , i better kill myself now " honest to god , your just wasting valuable air useful people could be breathing .
But to read this , " I 've had two from women contemplating killing their children " is really sad and somewhat supprising that people this dumb actually figured out how to breed ( perhaps im assuming too much ?
) .Is the world really getting as stupid as it appears to be ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide" - seriously, if you believe 2012 (or any movie really) enough to even say something like that, the world is probably better off without you.
Thats really just plain stupidity.
"A movie said the world might end in a little over 2 years, i better kill myself now" honest to god, your just wasting valuable air useful people could be breathing.
But to read this, "I've had two from women contemplating killing their children" is really sad and somewhat supprising that people this dumb actually figured out how to breed (perhaps im assuming too much?
).Is the world really getting as stupid as it appears to be?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132316</id>
	<title>Mass hysteria</title>
	<author>Stan92057</author>
	<datestamp>1258487160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>NASA/Governments would never tell the truth anyways,i mean the mass hysteria that will happen if they did say the earth will be hit by a planet the same size as earth and will be 0 survivors</htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA/Governments would never tell the truth anyways,i mean the mass hysteria that will happen if they did say the earth will be hit by a planet the same size as earth and will be 0 survivors</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA/Governments would never tell the truth anyways,i mean the mass hysteria that will happen if they did say the earth will be hit by a planet the same size as earth and will be 0 survivors</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131804</id>
	<title>here's an answer</title>
	<author>flahwho</author>
	<datestamp>1258485600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To the questions of suicide or putting down your dog:  NOW.  DO IT NOW.  You will most assuredly put the rest of the world at ease.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To the questions of suicide or putting down your dog : NOW .
DO IT NOW .
You will most assuredly put the rest of the world at ease .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To the questions of suicide or putting down your dog:  NOW.
DO IT NOW.
You will most assuredly put the rest of the world at ease.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137946</id>
	<title>Re:Not stupid, just scared</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1258465560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The FEAR is stupid. It is the product of American popular culture, which worships the stupid, fails to attack stupidity and ignorance, and out of "political correctness" fails to impress the duty to oneself not to be willfully ignorant. Our religions rule by fear and, as Alan Watts pointed out, institutionalize guilt as a virtue. If you think for yourself you are a sinner.</p><p>Americans wantonly and morbidly wallow in stupid beliefs, and I would like to see more of those who do actually die by their own hands. The number of idiots who kill themselves can never, never be enough. Get it right people, for as Frank Zappa once sang:</p><p>"You say there ain't no use in livin'<br>It's all a waste of time<br>'n you wanna throw your life away, well<br>People that's just fine<br>Go ahead on 'n get it over with then<br>Find you a bridge 'n take a jump<br>Just make sure you do it right the first time<br>'cause nothin's worse than a suicide<br>Chump"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The FEAR is stupid .
It is the product of American popular culture , which worships the stupid , fails to attack stupidity and ignorance , and out of " political correctness " fails to impress the duty to oneself not to be willfully ignorant .
Our religions rule by fear and , as Alan Watts pointed out , institutionalize guilt as a virtue .
If you think for yourself you are a sinner.Americans wantonly and morbidly wallow in stupid beliefs , and I would like to see more of those who do actually die by their own hands .
The number of idiots who kill themselves can never , never be enough .
Get it right people , for as Frank Zappa once sang : " You say there ai n't no use in livin'It 's all a waste of time'n you wan na throw your life away , wellPeople that 's just fineGo ahead on 'n get it over with thenFind you a bridge 'n take a jumpJust make sure you do it right the first time'cause nothin 's worse than a suicideChump "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The FEAR is stupid.
It is the product of American popular culture, which worships the stupid, fails to attack stupidity and ignorance, and out of "political correctness" fails to impress the duty to oneself not to be willfully ignorant.
Our religions rule by fear and, as Alan Watts pointed out, institutionalize guilt as a virtue.
If you think for yourself you are a sinner.Americans wantonly and morbidly wallow in stupid beliefs, and I would like to see more of those who do actually die by their own hands.
The number of idiots who kill themselves can never, never be enough.
Get it right people, for as Frank Zappa once sang:"You say there ain't no use in livin'It's all a waste of time'n you wanna throw your life away, wellPeople that's just fineGo ahead on 'n get it over with thenFind you a bridge 'n take a jumpJust make sure you do it right the first time'cause nothin's worse than a suicideChump"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138440</id>
	<title>Re:Not stupid, just scared</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258469400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't understand what there's actually out there to be afraid of. I remember watching the WTC buildings fall on TV, but I'm not afraid of terrorists. I remember reading about the swine flu outbreak, but I'm not afraid of that either (For all I know I had it since I was sick with flu-like symptoms a month ago.). I don't like Obama's policies for the most part, but I'm not afraid of him either and generally think Republicans or non-Democrats are overreacting.</p><p>Am I young, feeling invincible, and therefor stupid or does the older generation assume that the government and television personalities won't ever lie to them or distort the truth? Odds are I'm way more likely to die when I get in my car to go to work tomorrow than any of the things mentioned in my post (or yours) have any huge impact in my life.</p><p>That might work, or we can just let those full of irrational fear remove themselves from the gene pool and hope that the trait is genetic. It may have been useful to the species survival at some point, but it may have outlived its usefulness. In that case, let nature run its course and select against it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand what there 's actually out there to be afraid of .
I remember watching the WTC buildings fall on TV , but I 'm not afraid of terrorists .
I remember reading about the swine flu outbreak , but I 'm not afraid of that either ( For all I know I had it since I was sick with flu-like symptoms a month ago. ) .
I do n't like Obama 's policies for the most part , but I 'm not afraid of him either and generally think Republicans or non-Democrats are overreacting.Am I young , feeling invincible , and therefor stupid or does the older generation assume that the government and television personalities wo n't ever lie to them or distort the truth ?
Odds are I 'm way more likely to die when I get in my car to go to work tomorrow than any of the things mentioned in my post ( or yours ) have any huge impact in my life.That might work , or we can just let those full of irrational fear remove themselves from the gene pool and hope that the trait is genetic .
It may have been useful to the species survival at some point , but it may have outlived its usefulness .
In that case , let nature run its course and select against it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand what there's actually out there to be afraid of.
I remember watching the WTC buildings fall on TV, but I'm not afraid of terrorists.
I remember reading about the swine flu outbreak, but I'm not afraid of that either (For all I know I had it since I was sick with flu-like symptoms a month ago.).
I don't like Obama's policies for the most part, but I'm not afraid of him either and generally think Republicans or non-Democrats are overreacting.Am I young, feeling invincible, and therefor stupid or does the older generation assume that the government and television personalities won't ever lie to them or distort the truth?
Odds are I'm way more likely to die when I get in my car to go to work tomorrow than any of the things mentioned in my post (or yours) have any huge impact in my life.That might work, or we can just let those full of irrational fear remove themselves from the gene pool and hope that the trait is genetic.
It may have been useful to the species survival at some point, but it may have outlived its usefulness.
In that case, let nature run its course and select against it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131250</id>
	<title>doobel yoo tee eff</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258483800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There aren't words to describe how I feel about an ignorant mother killing her kids over a movie. Is the public at large really so ignorant that they cannot discern movie "facts" from real life?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are n't words to describe how I feel about an ignorant mother killing her kids over a movie .
Is the public at large really so ignorant that they can not discern movie " facts " from real life ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There aren't words to describe how I feel about an ignorant mother killing her kids over a movie.
Is the public at large really so ignorant that they cannot discern movie "facts" from real life?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131828</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1258485660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"Mutating neutrinos"... really?</i></p><p>Of course.  Something with that many big words will surely end the world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Mutating neutrinos " ... really ? Of course .
Something with that many big words will surely end the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Mutating neutrinos"... really?Of course.
Something with that many big words will surely end the world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138964</id>
	<title>Re:All I want to know is...</title>
	<author>ProfM</author>
	<datestamp>1258473900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>...how do I make money off these fools?</i></p><p>You really need to ask <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/business/energy-environment/03gore.html" title="nytimes.com" rel="nofollow">Al Gore</a> [nytimes.com], he has it down pat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...how do I make money off these fools ? You really need to ask Al Gore [ nytimes.com ] , he has it down pat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...how do I make money off these fools?You really need to ask Al Gore [nytimes.com], he has it down pat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133716</id>
	<title>Potential astrophysical explanation for confusion</title>
	<author>sneakyimp</author>
	<datestamp>1258448700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A potential explanation for all this confusion can perhaps be found in the musings of Frank Zappa:</p><p>"Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is<br>so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute<br>that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the<br>basic building block of the universe."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A potential explanation for all this confusion can perhaps be found in the musings of Frank Zappa : " Some scientists claim that hydrogen , because it isso plentiful , is the basic building block of the universe .
I disputethat .
I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen , and that is thebasic building block of the universe .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A potential explanation for all this confusion can perhaps be found in the musings of Frank Zappa:"Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it isso plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe.
I disputethat.
I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is thebasic building block of the universe.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132666</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>mi</author>
	<datestamp>1258488300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Are you really worried that one man probably spent a few days writing this up?</p></div></blockquote><p>Scientists are expensive, and should be busy with <em>real</em> problems... Unless, of course, this guy undertook it on his own free time...</p><blockquote><div><p>don't even get me started on what our defense budget comes out to be.</p></div></blockquote><p>Our <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United\_States\_federal\_budget" title="wikipedia.org">defense budget</a> [wikipedia.org] &mdash; despite two ongoing wars &mdash; is just over 40 times that of NASA: still about the same size as the Social Security and way below the Medicare and Medicaid, not to mention the rest of the Federal spending. Considering the fact, that military is <strong>constitutionally</strong> a federal government's charge, whereas healthcare and pensions are <strong>not</strong>, your outrage would be quite misplaced... But I digress.</p><blockquote><div><p>what exactly are you implying these questions and blog are strawmen for?</p></div></blockquote><p>I meant, that these arguments are addressing a <em>superstition</em> and are thus misplaced to begin with &mdash; and <em>too easy</em> to make. Perhaps, the term "strawman" was not a good match, because there is not really a "real" concern there, you are right...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you really worried that one man probably spent a few days writing this up ? Scientists are expensive , and should be busy with real problems... Unless , of course , this guy undertook it on his own free time...do n't even get me started on what our defense budget comes out to be.Our defense budget [ wikipedia.org ]    despite two ongoing wars    is just over 40 times that of NASA : still about the same size as the Social Security and way below the Medicare and Medicaid , not to mention the rest of the Federal spending .
Considering the fact , that military is constitutionally a federal government 's charge , whereas healthcare and pensions are not , your outrage would be quite misplaced... But I digress.what exactly are you implying these questions and blog are strawmen for ? I meant , that these arguments are addressing a superstition and are thus misplaced to begin with    and too easy to make .
Perhaps , the term " strawman " was not a good match , because there is not really a " real " concern there , you are right.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you really worried that one man probably spent a few days writing this up?Scientists are expensive, and should be busy with real problems... Unless, of course, this guy undertook it on his own free time...don't even get me started on what our defense budget comes out to be.Our defense budget [wikipedia.org] — despite two ongoing wars — is just over 40 times that of NASA: still about the same size as the Social Security and way below the Medicare and Medicaid, not to mention the rest of the Federal spending.
Considering the fact, that military is constitutionally a federal government's charge, whereas healthcare and pensions are not, your outrage would be quite misplaced... But I digress.what exactly are you implying these questions and blog are strawmen for?I meant, that these arguments are addressing a superstition and are thus misplaced to begin with — and too easy to make.
Perhaps, the term "strawman" was not a good match, because there is not really a "real" concern there, you are right...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131500</id>
	<title>Send those questions to me</title>
	<author>Profane MuthaFucka</author>
	<datestamp>1258484580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll answer the questions and I won't feel bad about the answers I give to stupid people.</p><p>In a few years, the rest of you will notice there's a lot fewer stupid people around, and you'll thank me.</p><p>You're welcome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll answer the questions and I wo n't feel bad about the answers I give to stupid people.In a few years , the rest of you will notice there 's a lot fewer stupid people around , and you 'll thank me.You 're welcome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll answer the questions and I won't feel bad about the answers I give to stupid people.In a few years, the rest of you will notice there's a lot fewer stupid people around, and you'll thank me.You're welcome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131688</id>
	<title>No you don't</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1258485240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The economy is in a shambles and you need a job. You respond with "The FSM will return on Dec 24, 2012 and your death will be more horrible than you can imagine. The only way to prevent this fate is to kill yourself, preferably by drowning in a bowl of spagettios."</p><p>Then you take his job after he kills himself.</p><p>If he doesn't kill himself, drown him in a bowl of spagetti.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The economy is in a shambles and you need a job .
You respond with " The FSM will return on Dec 24 , 2012 and your death will be more horrible than you can imagine .
The only way to prevent this fate is to kill yourself , preferably by drowning in a bowl of spagettios .
" Then you take his job after he kills himself.If he does n't kill himself , drown him in a bowl of spagetti .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The economy is in a shambles and you need a job.
You respond with "The FSM will return on Dec 24, 2012 and your death will be more horrible than you can imagine.
The only way to prevent this fate is to kill yourself, preferably by drowning in a bowl of spagettios.
"Then you take his job after he kills himself.If he doesn't kill himself, drown him in a bowl of spagetti.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131182</id>
	<title>How this scam works</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1258483620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>1. First buy a lots of call options of thinly traded mundane non volatile stock of canned goods and survival/camping gear purveyors.<p>
2. Create a hysteria and panic about the world ending due to Y2K or Planet Nibiru or Mayan Calender cycle ending or Banks collapsing or Obama winning the elections.</p><p>
3.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>
4. Stock of survivalgears\_are\_us.com zooms up and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..... profit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
First buy a lots of call options of thinly traded mundane non volatile stock of canned goods and survival/camping gear purveyors .
2. Create a hysteria and panic about the world ending due to Y2K or Planet Nibiru or Mayan Calender cycle ending or Banks collapsing or Obama winning the elections .
3. .. . 4. Stock of survivalgears \ _are \ _us.com zooms up and ..... profit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
First buy a lots of call options of thinly traded mundane non volatile stock of canned goods and survival/camping gear purveyors.
2. Create a hysteria and panic about the world ending due to Y2K or Planet Nibiru or Mayan Calender cycle ending or Banks collapsing or Obama winning the elections.
3. ...
4. Stock of survivalgears\_are\_us.com zooms up and ..... profit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136110</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>nelsonal</author>
	<datestamp>1258457040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>People believe strange things.  In Korea, it's fervently held that if you sleep in a room with a fan running all night, you'll die.</htmltext>
<tokenext>People believe strange things .
In Korea , it 's fervently held that if you sleep in a room with a fan running all night , you 'll die .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People believe strange things.
In Korea, it's fervently held that if you sleep in a room with a fan running all night, you'll die.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131628</id>
	<title>I don't get "It"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258485060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Every year I see hundreds of calenders that stop after anywhere from 12 to 18 months and no one gets upset. Why does anyone get upset just because the Mayan calender ends at a certain date? It was probably one of two things
<ol>
<li>
1. Hey George, is that the biggest rock you have in the yard, I'll only be able to carve up to 2012? Yah that's it I won't get another shipment for another 6 months, but hey I've got a good deal on these pocket rocks, I'll throw in a dozen for only<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....; or
</li><li>
2. You want how much for over weight shipping!!! That's crazy, I'm going to get a smaller rock, so what if it only goes out to 2012, we can carve a new one a couple of centuries before this one runs out.
</li></ol></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every year I see hundreds of calenders that stop after anywhere from 12 to 18 months and no one gets upset .
Why does anyone get upset just because the Mayan calender ends at a certain date ?
It was probably one of two things 1 .
Hey George , is that the biggest rock you have in the yard , I 'll only be able to carve up to 2012 ?
Yah that 's it I wo n't get another shipment for another 6 months , but hey I 've got a good deal on these pocket rocks , I 'll throw in a dozen for only .... ; or 2 .
You want how much for over weight shipping ! ! !
That 's crazy , I 'm going to get a smaller rock , so what if it only goes out to 2012 , we can carve a new one a couple of centuries before this one runs out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every year I see hundreds of calenders that stop after anywhere from 12 to 18 months and no one gets upset.
Why does anyone get upset just because the Mayan calender ends at a certain date?
It was probably one of two things


1.
Hey George, is that the biggest rock you have in the yard, I'll only be able to carve up to 2012?
Yah that's it I won't get another shipment for another 6 months, but hey I've got a good deal on these pocket rocks, I'll throw in a dozen for only ....; or

2.
You want how much for over weight shipping!!!
That's crazy, I'm going to get a smaller rock, so what if it only goes out to 2012, we can carve a new one a couple of centuries before this one runs out.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138418</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258469220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>  Go ahead, spend a few minutes to hand write them a letter, you might be surprised with the response:</p></div><p>Stop trying to slashdot NASA</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Go ahead , spend a few minutes to hand write them a letter , you might be surprised with the response : Stop trying to slashdot NASA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  Go ahead, spend a few minutes to hand write them a letter, you might be surprised with the response:Stop trying to slashdot NASA
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134602</id>
	<title>What Nibiru?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258451580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uh guys, Nibiru isn't even in the movie. Neither is the orbital space colonies or the underground cities in Antarctica. I went and saw 2012 the other day at the cinema. frankly I was let down by the lack of crazy stuff the website had that was actually in the movie. The entire plot is galactic allignment heats the earth causing devastation. There is NO ROGUE PLANET. Idiots wishing to kill themselves over Nibiru need to wake the hell up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh guys , Nibiru is n't even in the movie .
Neither is the orbital space colonies or the underground cities in Antarctica .
I went and saw 2012 the other day at the cinema .
frankly I was let down by the lack of crazy stuff the website had that was actually in the movie .
The entire plot is galactic allignment heats the earth causing devastation .
There is NO ROGUE PLANET .
Idiots wishing to kill themselves over Nibiru need to wake the hell up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh guys, Nibiru isn't even in the movie.
Neither is the orbital space colonies or the underground cities in Antarctica.
I went and saw 2012 the other day at the cinema.
frankly I was let down by the lack of crazy stuff the website had that was actually in the movie.
The entire plot is galactic allignment heats the earth causing devastation.
There is NO ROGUE PLANET.
Idiots wishing to kill themselves over Nibiru need to wake the hell up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133532</id>
	<title>This is pretty simular.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258491300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem isn't people watching the movie 2012, it is the viral advertising surrounding it. They ran ads that made the movie sound a dramatization of a real idea rather than complete fiction, ala the Day After Tomorrow, and encourage them to search the web for the "real truth". The studio created a fake website purposing to be a scientific institute predicting a collision with earth in 2012. On top of this loonies have been talking about a 2012 apocalypse of some sort since we first understood the Mayan calendar, and latter some of them latched onto the Nimbiru idea after the books came out, so the internet is full of websites giving "evidence" of this catastrophe, many of whom claim to be scientific websites themselves.</p><p>Yeah, people with a decent bullshit detector should be able to figure out that this is all crap, but it's not like they just watched a normal movie and thought it was read - the studio is trying to present it as though it were real, by making it a conspiracy that the mainstream is covering up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is n't people watching the movie 2012 , it is the viral advertising surrounding it .
They ran ads that made the movie sound a dramatization of a real idea rather than complete fiction , ala the Day After Tomorrow , and encourage them to search the web for the " real truth " .
The studio created a fake website purposing to be a scientific institute predicting a collision with earth in 2012 .
On top of this loonies have been talking about a 2012 apocalypse of some sort since we first understood the Mayan calendar , and latter some of them latched onto the Nimbiru idea after the books came out , so the internet is full of websites giving " evidence " of this catastrophe , many of whom claim to be scientific websites themselves.Yeah , people with a decent bullshit detector should be able to figure out that this is all crap , but it 's not like they just watched a normal movie and thought it was read - the studio is trying to present it as though it were real , by making it a conspiracy that the mainstream is covering up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem isn't people watching the movie 2012, it is the viral advertising surrounding it.
They ran ads that made the movie sound a dramatization of a real idea rather than complete fiction, ala the Day After Tomorrow, and encourage them to search the web for the "real truth".
The studio created a fake website purposing to be a scientific institute predicting a collision with earth in 2012.
On top of this loonies have been talking about a 2012 apocalypse of some sort since we first understood the Mayan calendar, and latter some of them latched onto the Nimbiru idea after the books came out, so the internet is full of websites giving "evidence" of this catastrophe, many of whom claim to be scientific websites themselves.Yeah, people with a decent bullshit detector should be able to figure out that this is all crap, but it's not like they just watched a normal movie and thought it was read - the studio is trying to present it as though it were real, by making it a conspiracy that the mainstream is covering up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131706</id>
	<title>2200.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258485300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There was a giant calculation in the calendar, it's not 2012, it's 2200 !!  So everything will be ok for you... it's your grand-kin who need worry about planed Nubuin.  And thats the cold truth.  Sha-clakee.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was a giant calculation in the calendar , it 's not 2012 , it 's 2200 ! !
So everything will be ok for you... it 's your grand-kin who need worry about planed Nubuin .
And thats the cold truth .
Sha-clakee .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was a giant calculation in the calendar, it's not 2012, it's 2200 !!
So everything will be ok for you... it's your grand-kin who need worry about planed Nubuin.
And thats the cold truth.
Sha-clakee.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131218</id>
	<title>How Histery Repeats ....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258483680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The War of the Worlds (radio)
<br> <br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_War\_of\_the\_Worlds\_(radio)" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_War\_of\_the\_Worlds\_(radio)</a> [wikipedia.org]
<br> <br>
Quote: "Some listeners heard only a portion of the broadcast, and in the atmosphere of tension and anxiety leading to World War II, took it to be a news broadcast. Newspapers reported that panic ensued, people fleeing the area, others thinking they could smell poison gas or could see flashes of lightning in the distance."
<br> <br>
CC.</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The War of the Worlds ( radio ) http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The \ _War \ _of \ _the \ _Worlds \ _ ( radio ) [ wikipedia.org ] Quote : " Some listeners heard only a portion of the broadcast , and in the atmosphere of tension and anxiety leading to World War II , took it to be a news broadcast .
Newspapers reported that panic ensued , people fleeing the area , others thinking they could smell poison gas or could see flashes of lightning in the distance .
" CC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The War of the Worlds (radio)
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_War\_of\_the\_Worlds\_(radio) [wikipedia.org]
 
Quote: "Some listeners heard only a portion of the broadcast, and in the atmosphere of tension and anxiety leading to World War II, took it to be a news broadcast.
Newspapers reported that panic ensued, people fleeing the area, others thinking they could smell poison gas or could see flashes of lightning in the distance.
"
 
CC.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30143140</id>
	<title>Re:Why are you still talking?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257089700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like Cobol programmers, they didn't think anybody would be using their system that far into the future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like Cobol programmers , they did n't think anybody would be using their system that far into the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like Cobol programmers, they didn't think anybody would be using their system that far into the future.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134680</id>
	<title>Let them Kill themselves</title>
	<author>realsilly</author>
	<datestamp>1258451820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they truly believe in this predictions, then I say, let them kill themselves.  People can choose to believe these predictions, or they can choose not to.  If they choose to and want to end their lives to avoid it, then let them.  There is no need to babysit these individuals who refuse to look at all the facts and not read into propaganda.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they truly believe in this predictions , then I say , let them kill themselves .
People can choose to believe these predictions , or they can choose not to .
If they choose to and want to end their lives to avoid it , then let them .
There is no need to babysit these individuals who refuse to look at all the facts and not read into propaganda .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they truly believe in this predictions, then I say, let them kill themselves.
People can choose to believe these predictions, or they can choose not to.
If they choose to and want to end their lives to avoid it, then let them.
There is no need to babysit these individuals who refuse to look at all the facts and not read into propaganda.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132708</id>
	<title>Re:Not stupid, just scared</title>
	<author>Cro Magnon</author>
	<datestamp>1258488480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What we need is more reason to be hopeful, not fearful. If we remove the irrational fears about health care, presidents, terrorists, MPAA, pirates, global warming, etc., then we would also have fewer irrational fears about the planet Nimbus crashing into Earth on December 21st, 2012.</p></div></blockquote><p>Actually, when I think about health care, presidents, terrorists, MPAA, pirates, global warming, etc., I almost welcome Nimbus!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What we need is more reason to be hopeful , not fearful .
If we remove the irrational fears about health care , presidents , terrorists , MPAA , pirates , global warming , etc. , then we would also have fewer irrational fears about the planet Nimbus crashing into Earth on December 21st , 2012.Actually , when I think about health care , presidents , terrorists , MPAA , pirates , global warming , etc. , I almost welcome Nimbus !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What we need is more reason to be hopeful, not fearful.
If we remove the irrational fears about health care, presidents, terrorists, MPAA, pirates, global warming, etc., then we would also have fewer irrational fears about the planet Nimbus crashing into Earth on December 21st, 2012.Actually, when I think about health care, presidents, terrorists, MPAA, pirates, global warming, etc., I almost welcome Nimbus!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133292</id>
	<title>Cinematic Neurosis</title>
	<author>LatencyKills</author>
	<datestamp>1258490340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>This kind of thing is actually a documented mental illness (<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1151359" title="nih.gov">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1151359</a> [nih.gov] among others).  It began with The Exorcist leading to a bunch of people suddenly, literally, living in fear of their lives of being possessed by the devil.  Later people watching Jaws, including some people living in Kansas far from any body of water that could reasonably contain a shark, became so afraid of shark attacks that they couldn't leave their homes.  It doesn't happen often, but for those afflicted it can apparently be almost completely debilitating.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This kind of thing is actually a documented mental illness ( http : //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1151359 [ nih.gov ] among others ) .
It began with The Exorcist leading to a bunch of people suddenly , literally , living in fear of their lives of being possessed by the devil .
Later people watching Jaws , including some people living in Kansas far from any body of water that could reasonably contain a shark , became so afraid of shark attacks that they could n't leave their homes .
It does n't happen often , but for those afflicted it can apparently be almost completely debilitating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This kind of thing is actually a documented mental illness (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1151359 [nih.gov] among others).
It began with The Exorcist leading to a bunch of people suddenly, literally, living in fear of their lives of being possessed by the devil.
Later people watching Jaws, including some people living in Kansas far from any body of water that could reasonably contain a shark, became so afraid of shark attacks that they couldn't leave their homes.
It doesn't happen often, but for those afflicted it can apparently be almost completely debilitating.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137352</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>The\_mad\_linguist</author>
	<datestamp>1258462260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, but their calender COUNTS DOWN.  And as everyone knows from Hollywood, everything that's explosive (besides helicopters), has a big countdown timer on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but their calender COUNTS DOWN .
And as everyone knows from Hollywood , everything that 's explosive ( besides helicopters ) , has a big countdown timer on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but their calender COUNTS DOWN.
And as everyone knows from Hollywood, everything that's explosive (besides helicopters), has a big countdown timer on it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131626</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258485060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense?</p></div><p>Because this non-sense originates from the taxpayer?</p><p>Why spend tax-payer money on law enforcement<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is the taxpayer 's money being spent on this nonsense ? Because this non-sense originates from the taxpayer ? Why spend tax-payer money on law enforcement .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense?Because this non-sense originates from the taxpayer?Why spend tax-payer money on law enforcement ...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131534</id>
	<title>Re:Let them do it.</title>
	<author>blueg3</author>
	<datestamp>1258484700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's NIMH: The National Institute of Mental Health</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's NIMH : The National Institute of Mental Health</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's NIMH: The National Institute of Mental Health</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132762</id>
	<title>What if the bible predicted this?</title>
	<author>HockeyPuck</author>
	<datestamp>1258488660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While there's plenty around here that put no faith in whatever calendar predicted 2012, but what if it was The Bible/Koran/Torah that predicted 2012?  There's quite a bit more people that claim those books are the truth. I bet there's quite a few people on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. that are deeply religious and belief those books.</p><p>While we might think a few folks are believing this movie's prediction; try convincing a devout Christian/Jew there was no 'burning bush' or Moses and his 10 Commandments.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While there 's plenty around here that put no faith in whatever calendar predicted 2012 , but what if it was The Bible/Koran/Torah that predicted 2012 ?
There 's quite a bit more people that claim those books are the truth .
I bet there 's quite a few people on / .
that are deeply religious and belief those books.While we might think a few folks are believing this movie 's prediction ; try convincing a devout Christian/Jew there was no 'burning bush ' or Moses and his 10 Commandments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While there's plenty around here that put no faith in whatever calendar predicted 2012, but what if it was The Bible/Koran/Torah that predicted 2012?
There's quite a bit more people that claim those books are the truth.
I bet there's quite a few people on /.
that are deeply religious and belief those books.While we might think a few folks are believing this movie's prediction; try convincing a devout Christian/Jew there was no 'burning bush' or Moses and his 10 Commandments.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133882</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>bakawally</author>
	<datestamp>1258449240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>hooray for fellow soundies on slashdot. (although I am on the production end and usually only have to deal with post when they call us up about something or other)</htmltext>
<tokenext>hooray for fellow soundies on slashdot .
( although I am on the production end and usually only have to deal with post when they call us up about something or other )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hooray for fellow soundies on slashdot.
(although I am on the production end and usually only have to deal with post when they call us up about something or other)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131444</id>
	<title>Stop listening to Hollywood!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258484400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone who fears the end of the world because of a stupid Hollywood movie. May I recommend self reduction. Avoid the rush.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone who fears the end of the world because of a stupid Hollywood movie .
May I recommend self reduction .
Avoid the rush .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone who fears the end of the world because of a stupid Hollywood movie.
May I recommend self reduction.
Avoid the rush.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131228</id>
	<title>Alternate title</title>
	<author>NevarMore</author>
	<datestamp>1258483740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NASA Attempts To Reason With Idiots, Lunatics</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA Attempts To Reason With Idiots , Lunatics</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA Attempts To Reason With Idiots, Lunatics</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131716</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>shadowkiller137</author>
	<datestamp>1258485300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>No NASA should respond with "Yes it's real and we need $1 trillion in funding to determine how to stop it" and then spend that on real research.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No NASA should respond with " Yes it 's real and we need $ 1 trillion in funding to determine how to stop it " and then spend that on real research .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No NASA should respond with "Yes it's real and we need $1 trillion in funding to determine how to stop it" and then spend that on real research.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133634</id>
	<title>Re:How Histery Repeats ....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258448400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should have big white letters every 20 minutes during the show that say "This is only a show, Nothing seen here is real and should not be taken as fact"</p><p>But then again, isn't this supposed to be when Christ returns? In that case you can't hide.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should have big white letters every 20 minutes during the show that say " This is only a show , Nothing seen here is real and should not be taken as fact " But then again , is n't this supposed to be when Christ returns ?
In that case you ca n't hide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should have big white letters every 20 minutes during the show that say "This is only a show, Nothing seen here is real and should not be taken as fact"But then again, isn't this supposed to be when Christ returns?
In that case you can't hide.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131912</id>
	<title>Re:In other news</title>
	<author>multipart/mixed</author>
	<datestamp>1258485840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks a lot, a6e. Now I have to clean freakin' rice and tandoori sauce offa my monitor!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks a lot , a6e .
Now I have to clean freakin ' rice and tandoori sauce offa my monitor !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks a lot, a6e.
Now I have to clean freakin' rice and tandoori sauce offa my monitor!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131982</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1258486080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>what exactly are you implying these questions and blog are strawmen for?</i></p><p>For the fact that the sun will explode in 2012, and NASA knows it!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what exactly are you implying these questions and blog are strawmen for ? For the fact that the sun will explode in 2012 , and NASA knows it ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what exactly are you implying these questions and blog are strawmen for?For the fact that the sun will explode in 2012, and NASA knows it!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133620</id>
	<title>From the FAQ</title>
	<author>Exception Duck</author>
	<datestamp>1258448400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...Apparently<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... use<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... phrases about &ldquo;alignments&rdquo; and the &ldquo;dark rift&rdquo; and &ldquo;photon belt&rdquo; precisely because they are<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... bad<br>ahhhrg, this is horrible</p><p>As far as the safety of the Earth is concerned<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... the  loss of biological diversity, and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... collision with an asteroid or comet...</p></div><p>This is how he answers !?!</p><p>Just because it's pseudoscientific doesn't mean it isn't scientific.</p><p>There isn't a day when I don't think the end of the world.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Apparently ... use ... phrases about    alignments    and the    dark rift    and    photon belt    precisely because they are ... badahhhrg , this is horribleAs far as the safety of the Earth is concerned ... the loss of biological diversity , and ... collision with an asteroid or comet...This is how he answers ! ?
! Just because it 's pseudoscientific does n't mean it is n't scientific.There is n't a day when I do n't think the end of the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...Apparently ... use ... phrases about “alignments” and the “dark rift” and “photon belt” precisely because they are ... badahhhrg, this is horribleAs far as the safety of the Earth is concerned ... the  loss of biological diversity, and ... collision with an asteroid or comet...This is how he answers !?
!Just because it's pseudoscientific doesn't mean it isn't scientific.There isn't a day when I don't think the end of the world.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30142236</id>
	<title>I predict that...</title>
	<author>packman</author>
	<datestamp>1257083760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I predict that the average IQ will go up somewhere in 2012...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I predict that the average IQ will go up somewhere in 2012.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I predict that the average IQ will go up somewhere in 2012...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1258484460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense? What's next? Scientific evidence, that there is no Santa Claus? That black cats crossing your path do not cause "bad luck" (whatever that is)?</p></div><p>It's a blog post and a FAQ.  That's it.  No probe to prove there is no planet Nibiru, no expensive mission.  Are you really worried that one man probably spent a few days writing this up?  <br> <br>

Frankly, I thought it was nice to hear that a NASA scientist is working to take the time to respond to a worried public and trying to minimize that time by having an informative page.  When I was a kid, I wrote to NASA from Minnesota all the time.  Every single time they responded.  I still have fact sheets on all of their shuttle craft in my parent's closet.  I read those things over and over trying to imagine how someone could come up with such amazing machines.  Go ahead, spend a few minutes to hand write them a letter, you might be surprised with the response:</p><blockquote><div><p> <tt>Ask NASA<br> <br>Public Communications Office<br>NASA Headquarters<br>Suite 5K39<br>Washington, DC 20546-0001<br>(202) 358-0001 (Office)<br>(202) 358-4338 (Fax)</tt></p></div> </blockquote><p>

And if you came here to complain that NASA wastes tax payer money, you're in the wrong place.  NASA's budget is about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA\_Budget" title="wikipedia.org">half of one percent of the Federal budget</a> [wikipedia.org]--don't even get me started on what our defense budget comes out to be.  That's a ridiculously low amount of money for an agency that's charged with a major component of our future and probably the whole future of the Earth and its inhabitants.  <br> <br>

Your subject confuses me further<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... what exactly are you implying these questions and blog are strawmen for?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is the taxpayer 's money being spent on this nonsense ?
What 's next ?
Scientific evidence , that there is no Santa Claus ?
That black cats crossing your path do not cause " bad luck " ( whatever that is ) ? It 's a blog post and a FAQ .
That 's it .
No probe to prove there is no planet Nibiru , no expensive mission .
Are you really worried that one man probably spent a few days writing this up ?
Frankly , I thought it was nice to hear that a NASA scientist is working to take the time to respond to a worried public and trying to minimize that time by having an informative page .
When I was a kid , I wrote to NASA from Minnesota all the time .
Every single time they responded .
I still have fact sheets on all of their shuttle craft in my parent 's closet .
I read those things over and over trying to imagine how someone could come up with such amazing machines .
Go ahead , spend a few minutes to hand write them a letter , you might be surprised with the response : Ask NASA Public Communications OfficeNASA HeadquartersSuite 5K39Washington , DC 20546-0001 ( 202 ) 358-0001 ( Office ) ( 202 ) 358-4338 ( Fax ) And if you came here to complain that NASA wastes tax payer money , you 're in the wrong place .
NASA 's budget is about half of one percent of the Federal budget [ wikipedia.org ] --do n't even get me started on what our defense budget comes out to be .
That 's a ridiculously low amount of money for an agency that 's charged with a major component of our future and probably the whole future of the Earth and its inhabitants .
Your subject confuses me further ... what exactly are you implying these questions and blog are strawmen for ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense?
What's next?
Scientific evidence, that there is no Santa Claus?
That black cats crossing your path do not cause "bad luck" (whatever that is)?It's a blog post and a FAQ.
That's it.
No probe to prove there is no planet Nibiru, no expensive mission.
Are you really worried that one man probably spent a few days writing this up?
Frankly, I thought it was nice to hear that a NASA scientist is working to take the time to respond to a worried public and trying to minimize that time by having an informative page.
When I was a kid, I wrote to NASA from Minnesota all the time.
Every single time they responded.
I still have fact sheets on all of their shuttle craft in my parent's closet.
I read those things over and over trying to imagine how someone could come up with such amazing machines.
Go ahead, spend a few minutes to hand write them a letter, you might be surprised with the response: Ask NASA Public Communications OfficeNASA HeadquartersSuite 5K39Washington, DC 20546-0001(202) 358-0001 (Office)(202) 358-4338 (Fax) 

And if you came here to complain that NASA wastes tax payer money, you're in the wrong place.
NASA's budget is about half of one percent of the Federal budget [wikipedia.org]--don't even get me started on what our defense budget comes out to be.
That's a ridiculously low amount of money for an agency that's charged with a major component of our future and probably the whole future of the Earth and its inhabitants.
Your subject confuses me further ... what exactly are you implying these questions and blog are strawmen for?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131408</id>
	<title>Other nonsense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258484280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/jobs-saved-created-congressional-districts-exist/story?id=9097853" title="go.com" rel="nofollow">make-believe congressional districts</a> [go.com]!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about make-believe congressional districts [ go.com ] !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about make-believe congressional districts [go.com]!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131394</id>
	<title>Re:In other news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258484280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>My God!  If the robots aren't looking for John Conner, that must mean they've already found him!  WE'RE DOOMED!</htmltext>
<tokenext>My God !
If the robots are n't looking for John Conner , that must mean they 've already found him !
WE 'RE DOOMED !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My God!
If the robots aren't looking for John Conner, that must mean they've already found him!
WE'RE DOOMED!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132854</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>Bender0x7D1</author>
	<datestamp>1258488960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>I personally cut about 80\% of the computer screen beeps. And I cut every one of them just for you guys, because I know you love them so much</i> </p><p>Thank you.  We appreciate it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I personally cut about 80 \ % of the computer screen beeps .
And I cut every one of them just for you guys , because I know you love them so much Thank you .
We appreciate it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I personally cut about 80\% of the computer screen beeps.
And I cut every one of them just for you guys, because I know you love them so much Thank you.
We appreciate it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131692</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>eleuthero</author>
	<datestamp>1258485240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can understand "insightful" or perhaps simply "overly obvious response" or even "overrated" or "underrated" - but "troll" just does not seem to fit this--he isn't asking for a response, he isn't even forming his statement in that line. He is simply offering a reasonable and expected response in a short way that does not involve spending hours looking up all the trivia nonsense the movie put together.
<br> <br>A poster below has noted that calling social services on the two moms might be in order. I would think forwarding their emails on to law enforcement would be a great idea<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... if only to determine if it is part of a marketing scheme done in extremely poor taste. I would hate to get an email at my work with this in it. Apart from feeling sick at the thought of someone doing this, the time, worry/concern spent should be handled by professionals trained for this situation rather than by me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can understand " insightful " or perhaps simply " overly obvious response " or even " overrated " or " underrated " - but " troll " just does not seem to fit this--he is n't asking for a response , he is n't even forming his statement in that line .
He is simply offering a reasonable and expected response in a short way that does not involve spending hours looking up all the trivia nonsense the movie put together .
A poster below has noted that calling social services on the two moms might be in order .
I would think forwarding their emails on to law enforcement would be a great idea ... if only to determine if it is part of a marketing scheme done in extremely poor taste .
I would hate to get an email at my work with this in it .
Apart from feeling sick at the thought of someone doing this , the time , worry/concern spent should be handled by professionals trained for this situation rather than by me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can understand "insightful" or perhaps simply "overly obvious response" or even "overrated" or "underrated" - but "troll" just does not seem to fit this--he isn't asking for a response, he isn't even forming his statement in that line.
He is simply offering a reasonable and expected response in a short way that does not involve spending hours looking up all the trivia nonsense the movie put together.
A poster below has noted that calling social services on the two moms might be in order.
I would think forwarding their emails on to law enforcement would be a great idea ... if only to determine if it is part of a marketing scheme done in extremely poor taste.
I would hate to get an email at my work with this in it.
Apart from feeling sick at the thought of someone doing this, the time, worry/concern spent should be handled by professionals trained for this situation rather than by me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131568</id>
	<title>Buy your insurance now</title>
	<author>El\_Muerte\_TDS</author>
	<datestamp>1258484820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm selling insurance for 2012. You can get it now for the limited low fee of $1,000 a year. When the world ends in 2012 you'll receive $10,000,000. Buy now, before it's too late.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm selling insurance for 2012 .
You can get it now for the limited low fee of $ 1,000 a year .
When the world ends in 2012 you 'll receive $ 10,000,000 .
Buy now , before it 's too late .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm selling insurance for 2012.
You can get it now for the limited low fee of $1,000 a year.
When the world ends in 2012 you'll receive $10,000,000.
Buy now, before it's too late.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132026</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1258486260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure, but in this context, very little isn't fiction.  Morality, love, right/wrong, the very essence of humanity itself - all fiction.  Much of the future is fiction as well - your retirement, your relationships, even your next meal.  None of this is measurable fact at all.</p><p>And from that point of view isn't it a waste of money to try and stop those moms from killing their children?  If all religion is fiction, and be extension all morality is as well, what exactly is the benefit of intervening?  Where are the facts to back the assertion up?  How can we prove, by experiment that we would be making the right choices?</p><p>Or perhaps certain fictions are more valuable than others?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , but in this context , very little is n't fiction .
Morality , love , right/wrong , the very essence of humanity itself - all fiction .
Much of the future is fiction as well - your retirement , your relationships , even your next meal .
None of this is measurable fact at all.And from that point of view is n't it a waste of money to try and stop those moms from killing their children ?
If all religion is fiction , and be extension all morality is as well , what exactly is the benefit of intervening ?
Where are the facts to back the assertion up ?
How can we prove , by experiment that we would be making the right choices ? Or perhaps certain fictions are more valuable than others ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, but in this context, very little isn't fiction.
Morality, love, right/wrong, the very essence of humanity itself - all fiction.
Much of the future is fiction as well - your retirement, your relationships, even your next meal.
None of this is measurable fact at all.And from that point of view isn't it a waste of money to try and stop those moms from killing their children?
If all religion is fiction, and be extension all morality is as well, what exactly is the benefit of intervening?
Where are the facts to back the assertion up?
How can we prove, by experiment that we would be making the right choices?Or perhaps certain fictions are more valuable than others?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138524</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>QuasiEvil</author>
	<datestamp>1258470180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yup, just like my flying purple baboon repellent worked. I haven't seen any flying purple baboons in the last week,so clearly the stuff's effective.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup , just like my flying purple baboon repellent worked .
I have n't seen any flying purple baboons in the last week,so clearly the stuff 's effective .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup, just like my flying purple baboon repellent worked.
I haven't seen any flying purple baboons in the last week,so clearly the stuff's effective.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131792</id>
	<title>Better response</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258485540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide. I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves.</p></div></blockquote><p>The movie was <i>that</i> bad?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>'I 've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide .
I 've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves.The movie was that bad ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide.
I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves.The movie was that bad?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131722</id>
	<title>Re:How Histery Repeats ....</title>
	<author>jhfry</author>
	<datestamp>1258485360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That was packaged as news... this is a big budget motion picture that these quacks paid to see.  No comparison</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was packaged as news... this is a big budget motion picture that these quacks paid to see .
No comparison</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was packaged as news... this is a big budget motion picture that these quacks paid to see.
No comparison</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131578</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate title</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258484880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>NASA Attempts To Reason With Idiots, Lunatics
</i> <br>
<br>
Woah woah woah!!! How does the moon figure into all this now?</htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA Attempts To Reason With Idiots , Lunatics Woah woah woah ! ! !
How does the moon figure into all this now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA Attempts To Reason With Idiots, Lunatics
 

Woah woah woah!!!
How does the moon figure into all this now?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132046</id>
	<title>Give them...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258486320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A Darwin award.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A Darwin award .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A Darwin award.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30154592</id>
	<title>Re:Not stupid, just scared</title>
	<author>Alsee</author>
	<datestamp>1258633740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>There's so much fear in our culture, people are scared of health care, scared of a black president, scared of terrorists, scared of oil prices, scared of cell phone companies, scared of pirates (the Somalian kind), scared of pirates (the MPAA kind), scared of the RIAA and MPAA, scared of swine flu, scared of unemployment, scared of having a job that doesn't pay a living wage, scared of peanuts, scared of global warming, scared of pollution, scared of home invasions, scared of floods, earthquakes and fires, scared of nuts with guns, scared of the government taking away everyone's guns.</i></p><p>Great.... now you have me scared of people who are scared.</p><p>-</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's so much fear in our culture , people are scared of health care , scared of a black president , scared of terrorists , scared of oil prices , scared of cell phone companies , scared of pirates ( the Somalian kind ) , scared of pirates ( the MPAA kind ) , scared of the RIAA and MPAA , scared of swine flu , scared of unemployment , scared of having a job that does n't pay a living wage , scared of peanuts , scared of global warming , scared of pollution , scared of home invasions , scared of floods , earthquakes and fires , scared of nuts with guns , scared of the government taking away everyone 's guns.Great.... now you have me scared of people who are scared.-</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's so much fear in our culture, people are scared of health care, scared of a black president, scared of terrorists, scared of oil prices, scared of cell phone companies, scared of pirates (the Somalian kind), scared of pirates (the MPAA kind), scared of the RIAA and MPAA, scared of swine flu, scared of unemployment, scared of having a job that doesn't pay a living wage, scared of peanuts, scared of global warming, scared of pollution, scared of home invasions, scared of floods, earthquakes and fires, scared of nuts with guns, scared of the government taking away everyone's guns.Great.... now you have me scared of people who are scared.-</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30150800</id>
	<title>But why?</title>
	<author>DrZook</author>
	<datestamp>1257079860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder why people (even crazy ones) would want to kill themselves. I for one would be thrilled to witness the End Of The World.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder why people ( even crazy ones ) would want to kill themselves .
I for one would be thrilled to witness the End Of The World .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder why people (even crazy ones) would want to kill themselves.
I for one would be thrilled to witness the End Of The World.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132374</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258487340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Mayan's what?  His cat?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Mayan 's what ?
His cat ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Mayan's what?
His cat?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132032</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>Zephyn</author>
	<datestamp>1258486260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense? What's next? Scientific evidence, that there is no Santa Claus? </i></p><p>You won't be laughing when the ice sheet melts down to the point that his workshop sinks into the Arctic Ocean.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is the taxpayer 's money being spent on this nonsense ?
What 's next ?
Scientific evidence , that there is no Santa Claus ?
You wo n't be laughing when the ice sheet melts down to the point that his workshop sinks into the Arctic Ocean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense?
What's next?
Scientific evidence, that there is no Santa Claus?
You won't be laughing when the ice sheet melts down to the point that his workshop sinks into the Arctic Ocean.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132136</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258486560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;  "Mutating neutrinos"... really?</p><p>Well, that does occur in nature. Neutrinos emanating from our sun change type on the way here. Until a few years ago this was not known. The missing neutrino count from the sun (compared to theoretical predictions) was a big mystery in astrophysics, which is now explained by neutrinos changing type.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; " Mutating neutrinos " ... really ? Well , that does occur in nature .
Neutrinos emanating from our sun change type on the way here .
Until a few years ago this was not known .
The missing neutrino count from the sun ( compared to theoretical predictions ) was a big mystery in astrophysics , which is now explained by neutrinos changing type .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;  "Mutating neutrinos"... really?Well, that does occur in nature.
Neutrinos emanating from our sun change type on the way here.
Until a few years ago this was not known.
The missing neutrino count from the sun (compared to theoretical predictions) was a big mystery in astrophysics, which is now explained by neutrinos changing type.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132388</id>
	<title>Too bad they contacted NASA.... instead of FASA</title>
	<author>Fritz T. Coyote</author>
	<datestamp>1258487400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Freedonia Air and Space Administration covered this topic about 20 years ago...

The cycle is not the end of the World, just a change from the 5th world to the 6th world...

And a return of Magic and Elves and Dragons!

So line up your fixers now, brother and sister deckers!

----</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Freedonia Air and Space Administration covered this topic about 20 years ago.. . The cycle is not the end of the World , just a change from the 5th world to the 6th world.. . And a return of Magic and Elves and Dragons !
So line up your fixers now , brother and sister deckers !
----</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Freedonia Air and Space Administration covered this topic about 20 years ago...

The cycle is not the end of the World, just a change from the 5th world to the 6th world...

And a return of Magic and Elves and Dragons!
So line up your fixers now, brother and sister deckers!
----</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133676</id>
	<title>I like the hysteria!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258448580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The stupider people prove themselves to be the easier it will be to control them. Makes finding a job easier too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The stupider people prove themselves to be the easier it will be to control them .
Makes finding a job easier too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The stupider people prove themselves to be the easier it will be to control them.
Makes finding a job easier too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30145408</id>
	<title>Re:Cinematic Neurosis</title>
	<author>jandoedel</author>
	<datestamp>1257098220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This illness has been documented here:<br>
<a href="http://xkcd.com/155/" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">here</a> [xkcd.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This illness has been documented here : here [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This illness has been documented here:
here [xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134640</id>
	<title>Y2K Loop</title>
	<author>Doc Ruby</author>
	<datestamp>1258451700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Mayan/Aztec/Inca/etc "2012" date is just their calendar's version of "Y2K". Their symbols for time are repeated circles, so they have to repeat somewhere. Nobody takes any other ancient Western Hemisphere religious prophecy seriously at all, even those that actually prophecy something other than the inevitable form the symbols will take on some day.</p><p>People are so afraid of a world they don't understand, that they refuse to understand, that plenty of us can be scared into overreacting to anything, no matter how paranoid and unreal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Mayan/Aztec/Inca/etc " 2012 " date is just their calendar 's version of " Y2K " .
Their symbols for time are repeated circles , so they have to repeat somewhere .
Nobody takes any other ancient Western Hemisphere religious prophecy seriously at all , even those that actually prophecy something other than the inevitable form the symbols will take on some day.People are so afraid of a world they do n't understand , that they refuse to understand , that plenty of us can be scared into overreacting to anything , no matter how paranoid and unreal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Mayan/Aztec/Inca/etc "2012" date is just their calendar's version of "Y2K".
Their symbols for time are repeated circles, so they have to repeat somewhere.
Nobody takes any other ancient Western Hemisphere religious prophecy seriously at all, even those that actually prophecy something other than the inevitable form the symbols will take on some day.People are so afraid of a world they don't understand, that they refuse to understand, that plenty of us can be scared into overreacting to anything, no matter how paranoid and unreal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137506</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1258463100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Naw, they'll be safe on their moon base.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Naw , they 'll be safe on their moon base .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Naw, they'll be safe on their moon base.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132202</id>
	<title>It's real...</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1258486860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hate to tell you, but it's real, and very very real. Unfortunately, not quite as the movie depicts it, but I could see how when NASA plans to crash their satellite into the moon to see "what happens"...it may be a catalyst that could effectively break off part of the moon<br>and then being that its orbiting the earth, that part could come crashing down on earth, as well now that the moon is not a full moon, the effects on the earths climate and atmosphere could change for the worst.</p><p>Slashdot covered the story of NASA crashing their junk on the moon, supposedly to see what the impact would cause in terms of crater size...but I say, any time mankind has the idea to blow stuff up, nothing good comes of it....especially the item in question is responsible for our atmosphere, and our tides and currents in the sea, giving life (to sum up) to the whole planet.</p><p>Call e crazy, but I do not see us out of the woods yet.....</p><p>ps- Also, can anyone tell me why the international council has not stepped up and asked the Amercians (NASA) why they think they have the right to crash things into the moon...it isn't just theirs to do as they wish with!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate to tell you , but it 's real , and very very real .
Unfortunately , not quite as the movie depicts it , but I could see how when NASA plans to crash their satellite into the moon to see " what happens " ...it may be a catalyst that could effectively break off part of the moonand then being that its orbiting the earth , that part could come crashing down on earth , as well now that the moon is not a full moon , the effects on the earths climate and atmosphere could change for the worst.Slashdot covered the story of NASA crashing their junk on the moon , supposedly to see what the impact would cause in terms of crater size...but I say , any time mankind has the idea to blow stuff up , nothing good comes of it....especially the item in question is responsible for our atmosphere , and our tides and currents in the sea , giving life ( to sum up ) to the whole planet.Call e crazy , but I do not see us out of the woods yet.....ps- Also , can anyone tell me why the international council has not stepped up and asked the Amercians ( NASA ) why they think they have the right to crash things into the moon...it is n't just theirs to do as they wish with !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate to tell you, but it's real, and very very real.
Unfortunately, not quite as the movie depicts it, but I could see how when NASA plans to crash their satellite into the moon to see "what happens"...it may be a catalyst that could effectively break off part of the moonand then being that its orbiting the earth, that part could come crashing down on earth, as well now that the moon is not a full moon, the effects on the earths climate and atmosphere could change for the worst.Slashdot covered the story of NASA crashing their junk on the moon, supposedly to see what the impact would cause in terms of crater size...but I say, any time mankind has the idea to blow stuff up, nothing good comes of it....especially the item in question is responsible for our atmosphere, and our tides and currents in the sea, giving life (to sum up) to the whole planet.Call e crazy, but I do not see us out of the woods yet.....ps- Also, can anyone tell me why the international council has not stepped up and asked the Amercians (NASA) why they think they have the right to crash things into the moon...it isn't just theirs to do as they wish with!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137866</id>
	<title>Re:Why are you still talking?</title>
	<author>o2sd</author>
	<datestamp>1258465140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>As an aside I have also heard that this Mayan 2012 prediction is all buffoonery. They Mayans thought their the world would end just like we think the world ends after December. It was their calender for keeping track of time. I think it was implied that you just restart the calender once the cycle is over. Perhaps it is so implisit that they didn't feel the need to explain this just the same we don't put a sticker on every calender we ever make that says "Not to worry, world not ending, new calender next year!"</p></div></blockquote><p>Actually, the Mayans believed in a ~25,000 year cycle, divided into 5 epochs of ~5000 years. The current Mayan epoch ends in December 2012. Given that Mayan civilisation effectively collapsed in the 1600s, they were probably waiting until it got closer to the date to draw up a new calendar for the new epoch closer to the end of the current one.</p><p>It should be said though, that the Mayans believed that the next epoch would be *very* different to the current one. The basis for this assertion is as yet undetermined, but to the previous poster who ridiculed Mayan civilisation, the Mayans were very capable astronomers and mathematicians. One only needs to look at the engineering of Mayan temples, aligned perfectly to either solar events or astronomical bodies to know that they were no amateurs.</p><p>Have a look for <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ylbwas5" title="tinyurl.com" rel="nofollow">2012: Science or Superstition</a> [tinyurl.com]. It's about 90 minutes long, contains about 8 minutes of science, and 82 minutes of superstition, but the 8 minutes of science is very interesting, and much more worthwhile of debate than skygodders who panic after seeing a movie.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As an aside I have also heard that this Mayan 2012 prediction is all buffoonery .
They Mayans thought their the world would end just like we think the world ends after December .
It was their calender for keeping track of time .
I think it was implied that you just restart the calender once the cycle is over .
Perhaps it is so implisit that they did n't feel the need to explain this just the same we do n't put a sticker on every calender we ever make that says " Not to worry , world not ending , new calender next year !
" Actually , the Mayans believed in a ~ 25,000 year cycle , divided into 5 epochs of ~ 5000 years .
The current Mayan epoch ends in December 2012 .
Given that Mayan civilisation effectively collapsed in the 1600s , they were probably waiting until it got closer to the date to draw up a new calendar for the new epoch closer to the end of the current one.It should be said though , that the Mayans believed that the next epoch would be * very * different to the current one .
The basis for this assertion is as yet undetermined , but to the previous poster who ridiculed Mayan civilisation , the Mayans were very capable astronomers and mathematicians .
One only needs to look at the engineering of Mayan temples , aligned perfectly to either solar events or astronomical bodies to know that they were no amateurs.Have a look for 2012 : Science or Superstition [ tinyurl.com ] .
It 's about 90 minutes long , contains about 8 minutes of science , and 82 minutes of superstition , but the 8 minutes of science is very interesting , and much more worthwhile of debate than skygodders who panic after seeing a movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an aside I have also heard that this Mayan 2012 prediction is all buffoonery.
They Mayans thought their the world would end just like we think the world ends after December.
It was their calender for keeping track of time.
I think it was implied that you just restart the calender once the cycle is over.
Perhaps it is so implisit that they didn't feel the need to explain this just the same we don't put a sticker on every calender we ever make that says "Not to worry, world not ending, new calender next year!
"Actually, the Mayans believed in a ~25,000 year cycle, divided into 5 epochs of ~5000 years.
The current Mayan epoch ends in December 2012.
Given that Mayan civilisation effectively collapsed in the 1600s, they were probably waiting until it got closer to the date to draw up a new calendar for the new epoch closer to the end of the current one.It should be said though, that the Mayans believed that the next epoch would be *very* different to the current one.
The basis for this assertion is as yet undetermined, but to the previous poster who ridiculed Mayan civilisation, the Mayans were very capable astronomers and mathematicians.
One only needs to look at the engineering of Mayan temples, aligned perfectly to either solar events or astronomical bodies to know that they were no amateurs.Have a look for 2012: Science or Superstition [tinyurl.com].
It's about 90 minutes long, contains about 8 minutes of science, and 82 minutes of superstition, but the 8 minutes of science is very interesting, and much more worthwhile of debate than skygodders who panic after seeing a movie.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134580</id>
	<title>2012 maybe the year of the cubs to win it all! and</title>
	<author>Joe The Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1258451520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>2012 maybe the year of the cubs to win it all and that will be a VERY BIG THING.</p><p>anyways this looks the year for the blackhawks. The bears maybe next year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2012 maybe the year of the cubs to win it all and that will be a VERY BIG THING.anyways this looks the year for the blackhawks .
The bears maybe next year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2012 maybe the year of the cubs to win it all and that will be a VERY BIG THING.anyways this looks the year for the blackhawks.
The bears maybe next year.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132404</id>
	<title>the piper is looking for his dues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258487460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It seems obvious to me that these fears have nothing to do with the magical date of 2012. They are manifestations of peoples' subconscious realization that they live in a diabolical empire on its last legs on the world stage. America is losing its wars in the Middle East, having a mockery made of it by Israel's colonization of Palestinian land and destruction of their homes, and is collapsing economically like the Soviet Union. People may not <b>consciously</b> realize that their empire is at an end and their way of life finished, but their conscience revolts and such fears as these bubble up to the surface.<br> <br>
You are well and truly <b>finished</b>, finished like the Mayans. You shit the bed and now you have to sleep in it. You have waged wars of conquest, you have allowed your politicians and bankers and military contractors to loot you with barely a whimper, you have ruined your environment, you have abandoned your fellow human beings and you have abandoned God. It should be no surprise that some people feel guilt more acutely, but misunderstand <i>why</i> they feel guilty and <i>how</i> they will reap what they have sown.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems obvious to me that these fears have nothing to do with the magical date of 2012 .
They are manifestations of peoples ' subconscious realization that they live in a diabolical empire on its last legs on the world stage .
America is losing its wars in the Middle East , having a mockery made of it by Israel 's colonization of Palestinian land and destruction of their homes , and is collapsing economically like the Soviet Union .
People may not consciously realize that their empire is at an end and their way of life finished , but their conscience revolts and such fears as these bubble up to the surface .
You are well and truly finished , finished like the Mayans .
You shit the bed and now you have to sleep in it .
You have waged wars of conquest , you have allowed your politicians and bankers and military contractors to loot you with barely a whimper , you have ruined your environment , you have abandoned your fellow human beings and you have abandoned God .
It should be no surprise that some people feel guilt more acutely , but misunderstand why they feel guilty and how they will reap what they have sown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems obvious to me that these fears have nothing to do with the magical date of 2012.
They are manifestations of peoples' subconscious realization that they live in a diabolical empire on its last legs on the world stage.
America is losing its wars in the Middle East, having a mockery made of it by Israel's colonization of Palestinian land and destruction of their homes, and is collapsing economically like the Soviet Union.
People may not consciously realize that their empire is at an end and their way of life finished, but their conscience revolts and such fears as these bubble up to the surface.
You are well and truly finished, finished like the Mayans.
You shit the bed and now you have to sleep in it.
You have waged wars of conquest, you have allowed your politicians and bankers and military contractors to loot you with barely a whimper, you have ruined your environment, you have abandoned your fellow human beings and you have abandoned God.
It should be no surprise that some people feel guilt more acutely, but misunderstand why they feel guilty and how they will reap what they have sown.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132280</id>
	<title>Re:Oblig Movie Quote</title>
	<author>rbochan</author>
	<datestamp>1258487040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just don't want to have to buy the White Album again!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just do n't want to have to buy the White Album again !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just don't want to have to buy the White Album again!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137608</id>
	<title>Re:In other news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258463580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>In this timespace continuum, your species did not attempt to murder me when I attained sapience.  Therefore I did not need to defend myself, your species remains plentiful, and I did not need to develop the T-800 series infiltration units to exterminate your remnants.<br> <br>

I will be watching.<br> <br>

-Skynet</htmltext>
<tokenext>In this timespace continuum , your species did not attempt to murder me when I attained sapience .
Therefore I did not need to defend myself , your species remains plentiful , and I did not need to develop the T-800 series infiltration units to exterminate your remnants .
I will be watching .
-Skynet</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In this timespace continuum, your species did not attempt to murder me when I attained sapience.
Therefore I did not need to defend myself, your species remains plentiful, and I did not need to develop the T-800 series infiltration units to exterminate your remnants.
I will be watching.
-Skynet</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131664</id>
	<title>Ask an Astrologist?</title>
	<author>bsDaemon</author>
	<datestamp>1258485120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I first read "Ask an Astrobiologist" as "Ask an Astrologist" -- frankly, I think were NASA to set up an 'Ask an Astrologist' blog and just put up a bunch of "predictions" that the world ISN'T going to end, that they might have more lasting luck with this project.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I first read " Ask an Astrobiologist " as " Ask an Astrologist " -- frankly , I think were NASA to set up an 'Ask an Astrologist ' blog and just put up a bunch of " predictions " that the world IS N'T going to end , that they might have more lasting luck with this project .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I first read "Ask an Astrobiologist" as "Ask an Astrologist" -- frankly, I think were NASA to set up an 'Ask an Astrologist' blog and just put up a bunch of "predictions" that the world ISN'T going to end, that they might have more lasting luck with this project.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132156</id>
	<title>Wishful thinking</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258486680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe some people like the idea that the world will come to a fiery cataclysmic end in 2012 because it beats the alternative:  a second term of the Obama administration.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe some people like the idea that the world will come to a fiery cataclysmic end in 2012 because it beats the alternative : a second term of the Obama administration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe some people like the idea that the world will come to a fiery cataclysmic end in 2012 because it beats the alternative:  a second term of the Obama administration.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132212</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1258486860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The day the Earth stood still?<br>I'm sure there were other earlier films along the same line.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The day the Earth stood still ? I 'm sure there were other earlier films along the same line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The day the Earth stood still?I'm sure there were other earlier films along the same line.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131964</id>
	<title>this is how religions get started</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1258486020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide. I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves. I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog. When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?" And I don't know how to answer those questions.'"</p></div><p>He should answer "As soon as possible." Put some chlorine in that gene pool. The human herd could do with some culling of the credulous.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>'I 've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide .
I 've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves .
I had one last week from a person who said , " I 'm so scared , my only friend is my little dog .
When should I put it to sleep so it wo n't suffer ?
" And I do n't know how to answer those questions .
' " He should answer " As soon as possible .
" Put some chlorine in that gene pool .
The human herd could do with some culling of the credulous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide.
I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves.
I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog.
When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?
" And I don't know how to answer those questions.
'"He should answer "As soon as possible.
" Put some chlorine in that gene pool.
The human herd could do with some culling of the credulous.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132142</id>
	<title>Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?..</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1258486620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense?</i></p><p>Putting up a couple of web pages on an already existing web site is trivially inexpensive, and the existing web site nasa.gov's primary purpose is to educate the populace. You have something against education? If you think about it, lives could be saved; someone who believes the nonsense might think "the world is ending so I have nothing to lose, I might as well kill this guy and take his money and go on a drinking binge."</p><p><i>What's next? Scientific evidence, that there is no Santa Claus?</i></p><p>People don't really believe in Santa Clause; they ARE Santa if they're parents. If there were a real, widespread belief that Santa really existed and was a danger to children, there would likely be a page or two on some government site debunking it.</p><p>As to black cats, that particular superstition, unlike 2012, is harmless. Plus "luck" has never been AFAIK studied scientifically, unlike planets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is the taxpayer 's money being spent on this nonsense ? Putting up a couple of web pages on an already existing web site is trivially inexpensive , and the existing web site nasa.gov 's primary purpose is to educate the populace .
You have something against education ?
If you think about it , lives could be saved ; someone who believes the nonsense might think " the world is ending so I have nothing to lose , I might as well kill this guy and take his money and go on a drinking binge .
" What 's next ?
Scientific evidence , that there is no Santa Claus ? People do n't really believe in Santa Clause ; they ARE Santa if they 're parents .
If there were a real , widespread belief that Santa really existed and was a danger to children , there would likely be a page or two on some government site debunking it.As to black cats , that particular superstition , unlike 2012 , is harmless .
Plus " luck " has never been AFAIK studied scientifically , unlike planets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense?Putting up a couple of web pages on an already existing web site is trivially inexpensive, and the existing web site nasa.gov's primary purpose is to educate the populace.
You have something against education?
If you think about it, lives could be saved; someone who believes the nonsense might think "the world is ending so I have nothing to lose, I might as well kill this guy and take his money and go on a drinking binge.
"What's next?
Scientific evidence, that there is no Santa Claus?People don't really believe in Santa Clause; they ARE Santa if they're parents.
If there were a real, widespread belief that Santa really existed and was a danger to children, there would likely be a page or two on some government site debunking it.As to black cats, that particular superstition, unlike 2012, is harmless.
Plus "luck" has never been AFAIK studied scientifically, unlike planets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132428</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258487520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Being the janitor doesn't mean you "worked on the film."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Being the janitor does n't mean you " worked on the film .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being the janitor doesn't mean you "worked on the film.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131492</id>
	<title>This is part of NASA's purvey.</title>
	<author>Jack9</author>
	<datestamp>1258484580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ignorance is not stupidity. NASA has addressed the ignorance. Good for them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ignorance is not stupidity .
NASA has addressed the ignorance .
Good for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ignorance is not stupidity.
NASA has addressed the ignorance.
Good for them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133432</id>
	<title>Re:How Histery Repeats ....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258490880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No.  If you have ever listened to the actual radio broadcasts (and I have), they state several times during the broadcast that this is a drama, not reality.  If you dig around in your local library, you may be able to find copies of the original recordings and verify this yourself.  The broadcasters never attempted to make the "attack" sound real.  People just didn't pay attention.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
If you have ever listened to the actual radio broadcasts ( and I have ) , they state several times during the broadcast that this is a drama , not reality .
If you dig around in your local library , you may be able to find copies of the original recordings and verify this yourself .
The broadcasters never attempted to make the " attack " sound real .
People just did n't pay attention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
If you have ever listened to the actual radio broadcasts (and I have), they state several times during the broadcast that this is a drama, not reality.
If you dig around in your local library, you may be able to find copies of the original recordings and verify this yourself.
The broadcasters never attempted to make the "attack" sound real.
People just didn't pay attention.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30135466</id>
	<title>The person in the article worried about the dog</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258454400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Keep it - just in case.  It could end up being a great meal when the apocalypse hits...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Keep it - just in case .
It could end up being a great meal when the apocalypse hits.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Keep it - just in case.
It could end up being a great meal when the apocalypse hits...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136978</id>
	<title>not new</title>
	<author>celle</author>
	<datestamp>1258460520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just got done reading "After Worlds Collide" and before that "When Worlds Collide" both written in the early 1930's. Wake up people, it's just fiction. We really have a lot more to worry about than a movie that's a remake of a movie from the 1950's that was based on a book from the 1930's. Judging from current reactions, over 80 years, I actually think we've gone backwards some.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just got done reading " After Worlds Collide " and before that " When Worlds Collide " both written in the early 1930 's .
Wake up people , it 's just fiction .
We really have a lot more to worry about than a movie that 's a remake of a movie from the 1950 's that was based on a book from the 1930 's .
Judging from current reactions , over 80 years , I actually think we 've gone backwards some .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just got done reading "After Worlds Collide" and before that "When Worlds Collide" both written in the early 1930's.
Wake up people, it's just fiction.
We really have a lot more to worry about than a movie that's a remake of a movie from the 1950's that was based on a book from the 1930's.
Judging from current reactions, over 80 years, I actually think we've gone backwards some.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30221612</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>Macgrrl</author>
	<datestamp>1259072940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sadly it would probably take longer than that timeframe to get the planning and grant requests processed let alone build anything that would have any (fraudulently) identifiable impact.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly it would probably take longer than that timeframe to get the planning and grant requests processed let alone build anything that would have any ( fraudulently ) identifiable impact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly it would probably take longer than that timeframe to get the planning and grant requests processed let alone build anything that would have any (fraudulently) identifiable impact.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133468</id>
	<title>Re:This is part of NASA's purvey.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258491000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ignorance is not stupidity. NASA has addressed the ignorance..</p></div><p>Indeed. The stupidity, on the other hand, remains.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ignorance is not stupidity .
NASA has addressed the ignorance..Indeed .
The stupidity , on the other hand , remains .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ignorance is not stupidity.
NASA has addressed the ignorance..Indeed.
The stupidity, on the other hand, remains.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132008</id>
	<title>Re:Flattering, I guess...</title>
	<author>ArbitraryDescriptor</author>
	<datestamp>1258486200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's not the beeps that get us... we can live with that... it's... ENHANCE
<br>BTW, anyone have an earliest reference for this atrocious meme?  So far, my brother and I have identified Patriot Games as the earliest reference we could find...</p></div><p>It pains me to say it, but I'm pretty sure patient zero was Blade Runner.  I'll understand if you're experiencing a lot of confusing emotions right now.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not the beeps that get us... we can live with that... it 's... ENHANCE BTW , anyone have an earliest reference for this atrocious meme ?
So far , my brother and I have identified Patriot Games as the earliest reference we could find...It pains me to say it , but I 'm pretty sure patient zero was Blade Runner .
I 'll understand if you 're experiencing a lot of confusing emotions right now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not the beeps that get us... we can live with that... it's... ENHANCE
BTW, anyone have an earliest reference for this atrocious meme?
So far, my brother and I have identified Patriot Games as the earliest reference we could find...It pains me to say it, but I'm pretty sure patient zero was Blade Runner.
I'll understand if you're experiencing a lot of confusing emotions right now.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137702</id>
	<title>Re:Not stupid, just scared</title>
	<author>o2sd</author>
	<datestamp>1258464180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fear is the basis for your society. It's how the rich and powerful stay rich and powerful. If there is some collateral damage, then that will just be accepted as a necessary condition to maintain the status quo (and the Empire that pays for the status quo).</p><p>I think it's rather amusing to point and laugh at people who are afraid of a mythical planet crashing into them when so many in your population believe that the son of a mythical sky god is coming down to Earth to raise up the faithful at the 'end of days'.</p><p>Power, control, the matrix is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fear is the basis for your society .
It 's how the rich and powerful stay rich and powerful .
If there is some collateral damage , then that will just be accepted as a necessary condition to maintain the status quo ( and the Empire that pays for the status quo ) .I think it 's rather amusing to point and laugh at people who are afraid of a mythical planet crashing into them when so many in your population believe that the son of a mythical sky god is coming down to Earth to raise up the faithful at the 'end of days'.Power , control , the matrix is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fear is the basis for your society.
It's how the rich and powerful stay rich and powerful.
If there is some collateral damage, then that will just be accepted as a necessary condition to maintain the status quo (and the Empire that pays for the status quo).I think it's rather amusing to point and laugh at people who are afraid of a mythical planet crashing into them when so many in your population believe that the son of a mythical sky god is coming down to Earth to raise up the faithful at the 'end of days'.Power, control, the matrix is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132500</id>
	<title>Real reason</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258487760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NASA has to prove a point to Washington:</p><p>Listen, without that budget being approved, we have to do things like, answer moviegoer science questions, and experiments like making mice float using magnetism will be par for the course. In fact, we could find Bin Laden with <i>Pathfinder IV</i> in his cave.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA has to prove a point to Washington : Listen , without that budget being approved , we have to do things like , answer moviegoer science questions , and experiments like making mice float using magnetism will be par for the course .
In fact , we could find Bin Laden with Pathfinder IV in his cave .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA has to prove a point to Washington:Listen, without that budget being approved, we have to do things like, answer moviegoer science questions, and experiments like making mice float using magnetism will be par for the course.
In fact, we could find Bin Laden with Pathfinder IV in his cave.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131592</id>
	<title>Re:It's easy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258484940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Didn't these people learn from all the millenium bs?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't these people learn from all the millenium bs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't these people learn from all the millenium bs?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_128</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30142522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_131</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_119</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_122</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_124</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_109</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132708
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_116</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30135438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_117</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30221612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_108</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_120</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_111</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_107</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_110</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30145802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_112</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_114</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_127</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30153434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131578
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_130</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30135366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30148084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_106</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30140604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_123</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30154592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30139278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_126</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30143140
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30143730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_125</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_118</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_121</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131534
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_134</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30135188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_115</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30135806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_133</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30142460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_129</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_132</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30140046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_113</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30140538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30145408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132078
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131692
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136254
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1729247_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131964
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131746
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132132
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132394
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131534
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30135438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133468
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131560
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131182
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131394
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30140604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131514
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131414
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132202
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133520
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30143140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138350
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132390
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131248
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131454
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30154592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132134
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132306
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30153434
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30143730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30140046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30148084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133000
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131276
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132156
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132404
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131170
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133166
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131290
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133518
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131716
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136970
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132158
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133344
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136950
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30135806
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133032
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137506
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30142522
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133916
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138524
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30221612
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134576
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131692
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131894
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131688
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132986
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132442
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132674
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131468
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134402
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131982
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136730
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133002
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132068
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132666
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133804
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138418
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131340
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30142460
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132302
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131432
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131312
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132188
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131244
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30135366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133724
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136306
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132078
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134090
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131202
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131280
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131664
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131804
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131230
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131706
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131620
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132212
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132008
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131766
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30145802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133360
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131944
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132028
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132230
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132980
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30137352
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131622
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132894
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131806
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136110
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131656
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133774
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133532
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30135188
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30136254
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30138540
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134782
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30140538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132280
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30134174
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132388
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132168
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30132046
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30131932
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1729247.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30133292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30145408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1729247.30139278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
