<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_15_1734238</id>
	<title>New Dating Sites Match People Through DNA Tests</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1258313220000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>The Installer writes with this excerpt from an Associated Press report:
<i>"A couple of genetic testing companies are promising to match couples based on DNA testing, <a href="http://www.komonews.com/news/tech/69979672.html">touting the benefits of biological compatibility</a>. The companies claim that a better biological match will mean better sex, less cheating, longer-lasting love and perhaps even healthier children. 'How many dating services can you think of where they can suggest you might have better children?' said Eric Holzle, founder of ScientificMatch.com, one of the first online dating sites to use DNA. ... The idea is that people tend to be attracted to those who have immune system genes that are dissimilar from their own. Biologists say the HLA genes of the immune system &mdash; which are responsible for recognizing and marking foreign cells such as viruses so other parts of the immune system can attack them &mdash; also determine body odor 'fingerprints.' And people tend to be attracted to the natural body odors of those who have different HLA genes from their own."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Installer writes with this excerpt from an Associated Press report : " A couple of genetic testing companies are promising to match couples based on DNA testing , touting the benefits of biological compatibility .
The companies claim that a better biological match will mean better sex , less cheating , longer-lasting love and perhaps even healthier children .
'How many dating services can you think of where they can suggest you might have better children ?
' said Eric Holzle , founder of ScientificMatch.com , one of the first online dating sites to use DNA .
... The idea is that people tend to be attracted to those who have immune system genes that are dissimilar from their own .
Biologists say the HLA genes of the immune system    which are responsible for recognizing and marking foreign cells such as viruses so other parts of the immune system can attack them    also determine body odor 'fingerprints .
' And people tend to be attracted to the natural body odors of those who have different HLA genes from their own .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Installer writes with this excerpt from an Associated Press report:
"A couple of genetic testing companies are promising to match couples based on DNA testing, touting the benefits of biological compatibility.
The companies claim that a better biological match will mean better sex, less cheating, longer-lasting love and perhaps even healthier children.
'How many dating services can you think of where they can suggest you might have better children?
' said Eric Holzle, founder of ScientificMatch.com, one of the first online dating sites to use DNA.
... The idea is that people tend to be attracted to those who have immune system genes that are dissimilar from their own.
Biologists say the HLA genes of the immune system — which are responsible for recognizing and marking foreign cells such as viruses so other parts of the immune system can attack them — also determine body odor 'fingerprints.
' And people tend to be attracted to the natural body odors of those who have different HLA genes from their own.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111314</id>
	<title>my point</title>
	<author>diogenes.lantern</author>
	<datestamp>1258299660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>was not that this flag doesn't play a part, but that it's being treated by many as a tell all, which I think is hardly supported.  Although I do admit that there is strong evidence to support it's involvement in mate selection, the further claims I think are overboard.  And, when people assume these further claims, I object to the technology for screening for the flag being used as a sort of relationship crystal ball.</p><p>I have to admit that some of the findings are compelling.  Complexity abounds in human behavior and genetics, though, and the idea that this marker tells all seems bizarre and quasi religious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>was not that this flag does n't play a part , but that it 's being treated by many as a tell all , which I think is hardly supported .
Although I do admit that there is strong evidence to support it 's involvement in mate selection , the further claims I think are overboard .
And , when people assume these further claims , I object to the technology for screening for the flag being used as a sort of relationship crystal ball.I have to admit that some of the findings are compelling .
Complexity abounds in human behavior and genetics , though , and the idea that this marker tells all seems bizarre and quasi religious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>was not that this flag doesn't play a part, but that it's being treated by many as a tell all, which I think is hardly supported.
Although I do admit that there is strong evidence to support it's involvement in mate selection, the further claims I think are overboard.
And, when people assume these further claims, I object to the technology for screening for the flag being used as a sort of relationship crystal ball.I have to admit that some of the findings are compelling.
Complexity abounds in human behavior and genetics, though, and the idea that this marker tells all seems bizarre and quasi religious.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30118932</id>
	<title>Re:So they Suck your Dick first???? PERFECT!</title>
	<author>Yamata no Orochi</author>
	<datestamp>1258400460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Troll? It's a joke. It may be a little tasteless for the tightwads around here, but it's still just a joke.</p><p>People have no idea what a troll is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Troll ?
It 's a joke .
It may be a little tasteless for the tightwads around here , but it 's still just a joke.People have no idea what a troll is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Troll?
It's a joke.
It may be a little tasteless for the tightwads around here, but it's still just a joke.People have no idea what a troll is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109130</id>
	<title>Anybodys else for Nutley?</title>
	<author>Dachannien</author>
	<datestamp>1258281480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are we sure they're not just corralling a bunch of stiffs at the bus station and pocketing our money?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we sure they 're not just corralling a bunch of stiffs at the bus station and pocketing our money ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we sure they're not just corralling a bunch of stiffs at the bus station and pocketing our money?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107862</id>
	<title>Hmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258317060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah...  Submit your DNA profile to a for-profit corporation that lets you do things with it through a web interface.  Your info will never be hacked.  Your info will never be sold.  Your info will never be given to government agencies.  Trust us.<br><br>What could possibly go wrong here?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah... Submit your DNA profile to a for-profit corporation that lets you do things with it through a web interface .
Your info will never be hacked .
Your info will never be sold .
Your info will never be given to government agencies .
Trust us.What could possibly go wrong here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah...  Submit your DNA profile to a for-profit corporation that lets you do things with it through a web interface.
Your info will never be hacked.
Your info will never be sold.
Your info will never be given to government agencies.
Trust us.What could possibly go wrong here?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108150</id>
	<title>Re:So they Suck your Dick first???? PERFECT!</title>
	<author>Tiger4</author>
	<datestamp>1258318440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most of us don't worry about that kind of DNA sampling.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of us do n't worry about that kind of DNA sampling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of us don't worry about that kind of DNA sampling.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30119098</id>
	<title>Re:Matching DNA? Oh, sweet...</title>
	<author>Yamata no Orochi</author>
	<datestamp>1258400940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>READ THE ARTICLE.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>READ THE ARTICLE .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>READ THE ARTICLE.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30116478</id>
	<title>Re:Untrue</title>
	<author>mapkinase</author>
	<datestamp>1258392300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Match by DNA to match by physical appearance is the same as looking at binary code of a JPEG file to a picture that this JPEG file contains.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Match by DNA to match by physical appearance is the same as looking at binary code of a JPEG file to a picture that this JPEG file contains .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Match by DNA to match by physical appearance is the same as looking at binary code of a JPEG file to a picture that this JPEG file contains.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108954</id>
	<title>Better children</title>
	<author>ozbird</author>
	<datestamp>1258280040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>'How many dating services can you think of where they can suggest you might have better children?'</p></div></blockquote><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensborn" title="wikipedia.org">Lebensborn</a> [wikipedia.org], Nazi Germany, 1935. (Non-Aryans need not apply.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>'How many dating services can you think of where they can suggest you might have better children ?
' Lebensborn [ wikipedia.org ] , Nazi Germany , 1935 .
( Non-Aryans need not apply .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'How many dating services can you think of where they can suggest you might have better children?
' Lebensborn [wikipedia.org], Nazi Germany, 1935.
(Non-Aryans need not apply.
)
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107858</id>
	<title>Hey baby...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258317060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nice genes...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice genes.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice genes...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108248</id>
	<title>Building up a smell/looks/DNA database</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258275720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would like to see the result of this study:<br>-Take the DNA of all freshmen<br>-Let the males and females smell each other one by one (in rooms so dark that beauty could be eliminated) and have them rate each other.<br>-Let the males and females see and rate each others looks (like a criminal lineup)</p><p>Now throw all that into a computer to find correlation between DNA / smell / looks.</p><p>Now you can build the database to match couples based on DNA. A lot of interesting research could come out ot it too. Exactly which genes likes which genes, and which detest each other. Are there some universally unlikable genes, and what do they code? Are there some universally likable genes, and what do they code?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would like to see the result of this study : -Take the DNA of all freshmen-Let the males and females smell each other one by one ( in rooms so dark that beauty could be eliminated ) and have them rate each other.-Let the males and females see and rate each others looks ( like a criminal lineup ) Now throw all that into a computer to find correlation between DNA / smell / looks.Now you can build the database to match couples based on DNA .
A lot of interesting research could come out ot it too .
Exactly which genes likes which genes , and which detest each other .
Are there some universally unlikable genes , and what do they code ?
Are there some universally likable genes , and what do they code ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would like to see the result of this study:-Take the DNA of all freshmen-Let the males and females smell each other one by one (in rooms so dark that beauty could be eliminated) and have them rate each other.-Let the males and females see and rate each others looks (like a criminal lineup)Now throw all that into a computer to find correlation between DNA / smell / looks.Now you can build the database to match couples based on DNA.
A lot of interesting research could come out ot it too.
Exactly which genes likes which genes, and which detest each other.
Are there some universally unlikable genes, and what do they code?
Are there some universally likable genes, and what do they code?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109116</id>
	<title>Re:Bias Filtering</title>
	<author>JeffSpudrinski</author>
	<datestamp>1258281360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's been mentioned already, but this is creepily close to GATTACA for my tastes.</p><p>Why is it that the creepy sci-fi is what becomes a reality?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's been mentioned already , but this is creepily close to GATTACA for my tastes.Why is it that the creepy sci-fi is what becomes a reality ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's been mentioned already, but this is creepily close to GATTACA for my tastes.Why is it that the creepy sci-fi is what becomes a reality?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108710</id>
	<title>Re:Building up a smell/looks/DNA database</title>
	<author>Dr.bme</author>
	<datestamp>1258278480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If I remember my Immunology course teacher correctly, they did something to this extent with women at a party smelling shirts or something.
I am pretty sure it only worked for women.


The basis is that to better the species you want different HLA subtypes to maximize the available differences of your MHC receptors. Basically the more different HLA subtypes the better your immune system will be able to adjust to different pathogens.


But I also remember that while this might be theoretically true it has no bearing whatsoever on reality, so woop de doo</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I remember my Immunology course teacher correctly , they did something to this extent with women at a party smelling shirts or something .
I am pretty sure it only worked for women .
The basis is that to better the species you want different HLA subtypes to maximize the available differences of your MHC receptors .
Basically the more different HLA subtypes the better your immune system will be able to adjust to different pathogens .
But I also remember that while this might be theoretically true it has no bearing whatsoever on reality , so woop de doo</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I remember my Immunology course teacher correctly, they did something to this extent with women at a party smelling shirts or something.
I am pretty sure it only worked for women.
The basis is that to better the species you want different HLA subtypes to maximize the available differences of your MHC receptors.
Basically the more different HLA subtypes the better your immune system will be able to adjust to different pathogens.
But I also remember that while this might be theoretically true it has no bearing whatsoever on reality, so woop de doo</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30122814</id>
	<title>HLA Matching = Better Spouse</title>
	<author>Physician</author>
	<datestamp>1258370880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I personally would like to marry someone who shared my HLA markers (assuming they're not my sibling) so they could donate their kidney to me someday if the need arose.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I personally would like to marry someone who shared my HLA markers ( assuming they 're not my sibling ) so they could donate their kidney to me someday if the need arose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I personally would like to marry someone who shared my HLA markers (assuming they're not my sibling) so they could donate their kidney to me someday if the need arose.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110668</id>
	<title>Re:Bias Filtering</title>
	<author>dbcad7</author>
	<datestamp>1258293060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That your legally blind increases the chance of some women of procreating, much in the way that beer does.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That your legally blind increases the chance of some women of procreating , much in the way that beer does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That your legally blind increases the chance of some women of procreating, much in the way that beer does.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107870</id>
	<title>Bias Filtering</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258317120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's bad enough that I'm legally blind but now I can add it to the list of attributes that might reduce my chances of procreating (as if analyst and programmer weren't bad enough).</p><p>Enjoy your gene pool, jerkwads!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's bad enough that I 'm legally blind but now I can add it to the list of attributes that might reduce my chances of procreating ( as if analyst and programmer were n't bad enough ) .Enjoy your gene pool , jerkwads !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's bad enough that I'm legally blind but now I can add it to the list of attributes that might reduce my chances of procreating (as if analyst and programmer weren't bad enough).Enjoy your gene pool, jerkwads!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109264</id>
	<title>Re:The company name is kind of disturbing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258282440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Incest Is Best Inc"</p></div><p>A wholly owned subsidiary of "Put your Sister to the Test, LLP"?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Incest Is Best Inc " A wholly owned subsidiary of " Put your Sister to the Test , LLP " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Incest Is Best Inc"A wholly owned subsidiary of "Put your Sister to the Test, LLP"?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107834</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108588</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258277760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But what about the idea that information MUST BE FREE?  Your DNA structure is information.  Shouldn't it be free to anybody who wants to download it?  Maybe it should be up on the Pirate Bay!</p><p>Or, is it that only Hollywood Movies, Britney Spears songs, and videogames are information that must be free?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But what about the idea that information MUST BE FREE ?
Your DNA structure is information .
Should n't it be free to anybody who wants to download it ?
Maybe it should be up on the Pirate Bay ! Or , is it that only Hollywood Movies , Britney Spears songs , and videogames are information that must be free ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But what about the idea that information MUST BE FREE?
Your DNA structure is information.
Shouldn't it be free to anybody who wants to download it?
Maybe it should be up on the Pirate Bay!Or, is it that only Hollywood Movies, Britney Spears songs, and videogames are information that must be free?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107862</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108690</id>
	<title>Pure aryan blood</title>
	<author>OrangeTide</author>
	<datestamp>1258278300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally a service that allows me to only meet pure white Aryans like myself and exercise my racist ignorant views under the guise of science.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally a service that allows me to only meet pure white Aryans like myself and exercise my racist ignorant views under the guise of science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally a service that allows me to only meet pure white Aryans like myself and exercise my racist ignorant views under the guise of science.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30113024</id>
	<title>New wave of one-liners</title>
	<author>supernes</author>
	<datestamp>1258363560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nice amino acids, wanna fuck?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice amino acids , wan na fuck ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice amino acids, wanna fuck?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110384</id>
	<title>How do I love thee?</title>
	<author>BReflection</author>
	<datestamp>1258290540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh how do I love thee? Let me spell the ways: GATTACA</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh how do I love thee ?
Let me spell the ways : GATTACA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh how do I love thee?
Let me spell the ways: GATTACA</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109576</id>
	<title>Re:Culture vs. Genetics</title>
	<author>tabrnaker</author>
	<datestamp>1258284600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why not try a new method since the old clearly hasn't worked out for you?  Please, no crap about 'oh, i've met some interesting people and had some good conversations...', it isn't working if you're still using the sites and don't have a mate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not try a new method since the old clearly has n't worked out for you ?
Please , no crap about 'oh , i 've met some interesting people and had some good conversations... ' , it is n't working if you 're still using the sites and do n't have a mate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not try a new method since the old clearly hasn't worked out for you?
Please, no crap about 'oh, i've met some interesting people and had some good conversations...', it isn't working if you're still using the sites and don't have a mate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108354</id>
	<title>I didn't RTFA</title>
	<author>MaXintosh</author>
	<datestamp>1258276320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I didn't RTFA, because I can proudly say that I was involved in the group that produced MHC mediated sexual selection studies that ScientificMatch.com uses to claim their rationale.   A few comments: First, if Scientific match has any wits about them, they'll also consider other information. I don't think anyone's stupid enough to think there's a single correlate to mate selection. But the worry about people who are too different is poorly founded - MHC diversity is strongly retained throughout most human lineages. We've had negative frequency dependant since we were swimming in the ocean, and as a result, if you sequenced any given allele, you'd find that it's just as related to Gorilla sequence as it is another randomly chosen allele. My ex-boss used to have students do this as an exercise to illustrate the point. Because of this, you're just as likely to find someone very MHC (or in humans, HLA) dissimilar next door in these modern, mobile times, than you are in, say, in a distant country.<br> <br>Second: They're only (to my knowledge) matching at MHC for disassortative matings, not the rest of the Genome. How is this better than picking someone based on hobbies? Because research actually shows that mating patterns in humans follows this pattern. It <i>is</i> a bit of a crock, since the odds of you picking two people at random with similar MHC complements is low, but let's not get into that.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)<br> <br>Finally, let me just say, I'm proud that so much scientific blood, sweat and tears into understanding the maintenance of the immune system, and what drives host-parasite co-evolution, has been distilled into an online dating site. Forget having worked with a Nobel laureate, <b>this</b> the highest honour a scientist can know.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't RTFA , because I can proudly say that I was involved in the group that produced MHC mediated sexual selection studies that ScientificMatch.com uses to claim their rationale .
A few comments : First , if Scientific match has any wits about them , they 'll also consider other information .
I do n't think anyone 's stupid enough to think there 's a single correlate to mate selection .
But the worry about people who are too different is poorly founded - MHC diversity is strongly retained throughout most human lineages .
We 've had negative frequency dependant since we were swimming in the ocean , and as a result , if you sequenced any given allele , you 'd find that it 's just as related to Gorilla sequence as it is another randomly chosen allele .
My ex-boss used to have students do this as an exercise to illustrate the point .
Because of this , you 're just as likely to find someone very MHC ( or in humans , HLA ) dissimilar next door in these modern , mobile times , than you are in , say , in a distant country .
Second : They 're only ( to my knowledge ) matching at MHC for disassortative matings , not the rest of the Genome .
How is this better than picking someone based on hobbies ?
Because research actually shows that mating patterns in humans follows this pattern .
It is a bit of a crock , since the odds of you picking two people at random with similar MHC complements is low , but let 's not get into that .
; ) Finally , let me just say , I 'm proud that so much scientific blood , sweat and tears into understanding the maintenance of the immune system , and what drives host-parasite co-evolution , has been distilled into an online dating site .
Forget having worked with a Nobel laureate , this the highest honour a scientist can know .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't RTFA, because I can proudly say that I was involved in the group that produced MHC mediated sexual selection studies that ScientificMatch.com uses to claim their rationale.
A few comments: First, if Scientific match has any wits about them, they'll also consider other information.
I don't think anyone's stupid enough to think there's a single correlate to mate selection.
But the worry about people who are too different is poorly founded - MHC diversity is strongly retained throughout most human lineages.
We've had negative frequency dependant since we were swimming in the ocean, and as a result, if you sequenced any given allele, you'd find that it's just as related to Gorilla sequence as it is another randomly chosen allele.
My ex-boss used to have students do this as an exercise to illustrate the point.
Because of this, you're just as likely to find someone very MHC (or in humans, HLA) dissimilar next door in these modern, mobile times, than you are in, say, in a distant country.
Second: They're only (to my knowledge) matching at MHC for disassortative matings, not the rest of the Genome.
How is this better than picking someone based on hobbies?
Because research actually shows that mating patterns in humans follows this pattern.
It is a bit of a crock, since the odds of you picking two people at random with similar MHC complements is low, but let's not get into that.
;) Finally, let me just say, I'm proud that so much scientific blood, sweat and tears into understanding the maintenance of the immune system, and what drives host-parasite co-evolution, has been distilled into an online dating site.
Forget having worked with a Nobel laureate, this the highest honour a scientist can know.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30116222</id>
	<title>Re:Building up a smell/looks/DNA database</title>
	<author>juhaz</author>
	<datestamp>1258391040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Are there some universally likable genes, and what do they code?</p></div><p>Why, yes there are. They code for Slashdot use.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are there some universally likable genes , and what do they code ? Why , yes there are .
They code for Slashdot use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are there some universally likable genes, and what do they code?Why, yes there are.
They code for Slashdot use.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110050</id>
	<title>We're marching to a faster pace...</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1258288140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look out, here comes the Master Race!</p><p>Seriously (and with apologies to Mel Brooks for quoting his masterpiece), this is an incredible pile of pseudoscientific horse shit.   It reminds me of a guy I knew in high school who copied plans from a book for a UFO detector. He built the device, and was proud that it could detect UFOs *invisible to the naked eye*!</p><p>I've been researching eugenic theories from the 1930s for a story I'm writing, a process that is all to easy because those opinions are alive and well today, and the papers of quacks like Dr. Robert Bennet Bean are still being quoted on sites like stormfront today. In fact the University of Virginia still proudly awards a prize in the name of this "researcher", who apparently didn't understand the concept of statistical significance, and could a negative finding into a positive one with a stroke of his twisted genius (the reason there was no physiological difference between the negro and white subjects in one study was that the cadavers were from the *best* negroes and the the *worst* whites -- thus converting Bean's negative finding in the data into a confirmation of his racial theories).</p><p>Eugenicists aren't just ignorant of basic statistical concepts like significance and regression to the mean, they apparently don't understand what sex is for.</p><p>Why do we as organisms bother with sex, instead of something simpler like mitosis or parthenogenesis? It's to create greater genetic diversity.  This does no good for the individual.  If you have a remarkably successful parent, you'd be better off being a clone, but evolution doesn't care about individuals.  The *species* is  better off if parents generate a range of offspring types, drawing from their generally successful genes and combining them in unpredictable ways.  Furthermore, human beings, even the most inbred aristocratic families, are wild animals.  We aren't like dogs that have been bred for literally hundreds of generations; genetically speaking we're mongrels.</p><p>The upshot is you can't look at a single gene and make the kind of predictions these companies are pretending to make.  Even if you had data that showed a mutation in one of a pair  identical twins lead to a certain behavior, you couldn't conclude the same effect would occur in fraternal twins, unless you were talking about some kind of serious genetic anomaly.  That's not even  counting environmental behaviors on the development of phenotype, such as culture.  Once the Danes got in longboats and went raping and pillaging. Now they are second in the world in percent of GDP spent on foreign aid.</p><p>The idea you can predict the quality of sexual pleasure by matching genes is laughable.   For one thing, for a guy sex is like pizza -- it's almost impossible to get it wrong.  For a gal, guaranteed her gut feelings about the guy's behavior are going to be a better predictor of sexual pleasure than any genetic marker, because those feelings are so intimately tied to that pleasure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look out , here comes the Master Race ! Seriously ( and with apologies to Mel Brooks for quoting his masterpiece ) , this is an incredible pile of pseudoscientific horse shit .
It reminds me of a guy I knew in high school who copied plans from a book for a UFO detector .
He built the device , and was proud that it could detect UFOs * invisible to the naked eye * ! I 've been researching eugenic theories from the 1930s for a story I 'm writing , a process that is all to easy because those opinions are alive and well today , and the papers of quacks like Dr. Robert Bennet Bean are still being quoted on sites like stormfront today .
In fact the University of Virginia still proudly awards a prize in the name of this " researcher " , who apparently did n't understand the concept of statistical significance , and could a negative finding into a positive one with a stroke of his twisted genius ( the reason there was no physiological difference between the negro and white subjects in one study was that the cadavers were from the * best * negroes and the the * worst * whites -- thus converting Bean 's negative finding in the data into a confirmation of his racial theories ) .Eugenicists are n't just ignorant of basic statistical concepts like significance and regression to the mean , they apparently do n't understand what sex is for.Why do we as organisms bother with sex , instead of something simpler like mitosis or parthenogenesis ?
It 's to create greater genetic diversity .
This does no good for the individual .
If you have a remarkably successful parent , you 'd be better off being a clone , but evolution does n't care about individuals .
The * species * is better off if parents generate a range of offspring types , drawing from their generally successful genes and combining them in unpredictable ways .
Furthermore , human beings , even the most inbred aristocratic families , are wild animals .
We are n't like dogs that have been bred for literally hundreds of generations ; genetically speaking we 're mongrels.The upshot is you ca n't look at a single gene and make the kind of predictions these companies are pretending to make .
Even if you had data that showed a mutation in one of a pair identical twins lead to a certain behavior , you could n't conclude the same effect would occur in fraternal twins , unless you were talking about some kind of serious genetic anomaly .
That 's not even counting environmental behaviors on the development of phenotype , such as culture .
Once the Danes got in longboats and went raping and pillaging .
Now they are second in the world in percent of GDP spent on foreign aid.The idea you can predict the quality of sexual pleasure by matching genes is laughable .
For one thing , for a guy sex is like pizza -- it 's almost impossible to get it wrong .
For a gal , guaranteed her gut feelings about the guy 's behavior are going to be a better predictor of sexual pleasure than any genetic marker , because those feelings are so intimately tied to that pleasure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look out, here comes the Master Race!Seriously (and with apologies to Mel Brooks for quoting his masterpiece), this is an incredible pile of pseudoscientific horse shit.
It reminds me of a guy I knew in high school who copied plans from a book for a UFO detector.
He built the device, and was proud that it could detect UFOs *invisible to the naked eye*!I've been researching eugenic theories from the 1930s for a story I'm writing, a process that is all to easy because those opinions are alive and well today, and the papers of quacks like Dr. Robert Bennet Bean are still being quoted on sites like stormfront today.
In fact the University of Virginia still proudly awards a prize in the name of this "researcher", who apparently didn't understand the concept of statistical significance, and could a negative finding into a positive one with a stroke of his twisted genius (the reason there was no physiological difference between the negro and white subjects in one study was that the cadavers were from the *best* negroes and the the *worst* whites -- thus converting Bean's negative finding in the data into a confirmation of his racial theories).Eugenicists aren't just ignorant of basic statistical concepts like significance and regression to the mean, they apparently don't understand what sex is for.Why do we as organisms bother with sex, instead of something simpler like mitosis or parthenogenesis?
It's to create greater genetic diversity.
This does no good for the individual.
If you have a remarkably successful parent, you'd be better off being a clone, but evolution doesn't care about individuals.
The *species* is  better off if parents generate a range of offspring types, drawing from their generally successful genes and combining them in unpredictable ways.
Furthermore, human beings, even the most inbred aristocratic families, are wild animals.
We aren't like dogs that have been bred for literally hundreds of generations; genetically speaking we're mongrels.The upshot is you can't look at a single gene and make the kind of predictions these companies are pretending to make.
Even if you had data that showed a mutation in one of a pair  identical twins lead to a certain behavior, you couldn't conclude the same effect would occur in fraternal twins, unless you were talking about some kind of serious genetic anomaly.
That's not even  counting environmental behaviors on the development of phenotype, such as culture.
Once the Danes got in longboats and went raping and pillaging.
Now they are second in the world in percent of GDP spent on foreign aid.The idea you can predict the quality of sexual pleasure by matching genes is laughable.
For one thing, for a guy sex is like pizza -- it's almost impossible to get it wrong.
For a gal, guaranteed her gut feelings about the guy's behavior are going to be a better predictor of sexual pleasure than any genetic marker, because those feelings are so intimately tied to that pleasure.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108490</id>
	<title>The world agrees with you</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1258277100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We all agree, nobody would want to date anyone who even remotely resembles you.
</p><p>Luckily, on slashdot, you are not alone. Welcome brother/sister.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We all agree , nobody would want to date anyone who even remotely resembles you .
Luckily , on slashdot , you are not alone .
Welcome brother/sister .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We all agree, nobody would want to date anyone who even remotely resembles you.
Luckily, on slashdot, you are not alone.
Welcome brother/sister.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108522</id>
	<title>In other words ...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1258277340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The idea is that people tend to be attracted to those who have immune system genes that are dissimilar from their own.</p></div><p>... the 98 lb weakling with chronic asthma, coke-bottle glasses and a physique suited to the chess club is attracted to the 6 foot tall blonde Swedish ski champion goddess. </p><p>Slashdotters worldwide rejoice.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The idea is that people tend to be attracted to those who have immune system genes that are dissimilar from their own.... the 98 lb weakling with chronic asthma , coke-bottle glasses and a physique suited to the chess club is attracted to the 6 foot tall blonde Swedish ski champion goddess .
Slashdotters worldwide rejoice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The idea is that people tend to be attracted to those who have immune system genes that are dissimilar from their own.... the 98 lb weakling with chronic asthma, coke-bottle glasses and a physique suited to the chess club is attracted to the 6 foot tall blonde Swedish ski champion goddess.
Slashdotters worldwide rejoice.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109124</id>
	<title>the transfer of responsibility to machines</title>
	<author>diogenes.lantern</author>
	<datestamp>1258281360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The science on this is still fairly recent, and as such, the claim that there is strong data linking these gene pairings with the longevity of a relationship, and even more doubtful, the lower probability of mates cheating on eachother, seems spurious to say the least.  There are so many other factors at play here, a single corner of the genetic code can't justifiably be held responsible for the success of a relationship.  At least not without comprehensive several decade studies, and even then, it's still one abstraction among many abstractions (which, for the most part, we are still in the dark about the true function and nature of).</p><p>More troubling, though, is the abandonment of instinct in the dating world.  When did we become so divorced and mistrusting of our senses and reason that we have come to rely on machines to screen possible mates, especially for a genetic trait that we can discover ourselves with our olfactory sense that we're equipped with from birth.  And the argument that you're dating blind online doesn't work, because these traits aren't only going to be used online to determine the fitness of a prospective partner.  Many companies want to build handheld scanners that test for these immune system flags.  A negative match might mean that someone's faith in you as a partner is heavily diminished, despite your being compatible with them in a host of other ways.</p><p>junk science; throw it out.  trust your instincts and rapport with someone.  a good immune system gene pairing does not a good relationship make</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The science on this is still fairly recent , and as such , the claim that there is strong data linking these gene pairings with the longevity of a relationship , and even more doubtful , the lower probability of mates cheating on eachother , seems spurious to say the least .
There are so many other factors at play here , a single corner of the genetic code ca n't justifiably be held responsible for the success of a relationship .
At least not without comprehensive several decade studies , and even then , it 's still one abstraction among many abstractions ( which , for the most part , we are still in the dark about the true function and nature of ) .More troubling , though , is the abandonment of instinct in the dating world .
When did we become so divorced and mistrusting of our senses and reason that we have come to rely on machines to screen possible mates , especially for a genetic trait that we can discover ourselves with our olfactory sense that we 're equipped with from birth .
And the argument that you 're dating blind online does n't work , because these traits are n't only going to be used online to determine the fitness of a prospective partner .
Many companies want to build handheld scanners that test for these immune system flags .
A negative match might mean that someone 's faith in you as a partner is heavily diminished , despite your being compatible with them in a host of other ways.junk science ; throw it out .
trust your instincts and rapport with someone .
a good immune system gene pairing does not a good relationship make</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The science on this is still fairly recent, and as such, the claim that there is strong data linking these gene pairings with the longevity of a relationship, and even more doubtful, the lower probability of mates cheating on eachother, seems spurious to say the least.
There are so many other factors at play here, a single corner of the genetic code can't justifiably be held responsible for the success of a relationship.
At least not without comprehensive several decade studies, and even then, it's still one abstraction among many abstractions (which, for the most part, we are still in the dark about the true function and nature of).More troubling, though, is the abandonment of instinct in the dating world.
When did we become so divorced and mistrusting of our senses and reason that we have come to rely on machines to screen possible mates, especially for a genetic trait that we can discover ourselves with our olfactory sense that we're equipped with from birth.
And the argument that you're dating blind online doesn't work, because these traits aren't only going to be used online to determine the fitness of a prospective partner.
Many companies want to build handheld scanners that test for these immune system flags.
A negative match might mean that someone's faith in you as a partner is heavily diminished, despite your being compatible with them in a host of other ways.junk science; throw it out.
trust your instincts and rapport with someone.
a good immune system gene pairing does not a good relationship make</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108466</id>
	<title>Re:Building up a smell/looks/DNA database</title>
	<author>MaXintosh</author>
	<datestamp>1258276980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Such a study would be riddled with false positives for any moderate sample size. In order to get statistical power over the whole genome (which is what you're proposing) you'd need a town's worth of data to even begin to correct for multiple tests. Whole Genome Inference is definitely in its infancy, and there's serious questions as to whether we'll ever be able to do it. It's much scientifically safer to approach these things with very specific hypothesis in mind.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Such a study would be riddled with false positives for any moderate sample size .
In order to get statistical power over the whole genome ( which is what you 're proposing ) you 'd need a town 's worth of data to even begin to correct for multiple tests .
Whole Genome Inference is definitely in its infancy , and there 's serious questions as to whether we 'll ever be able to do it .
It 's much scientifically safer to approach these things with very specific hypothesis in mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Such a study would be riddled with false positives for any moderate sample size.
In order to get statistical power over the whole genome (which is what you're proposing) you'd need a town's worth of data to even begin to correct for multiple tests.
Whole Genome Inference is definitely in its infancy, and there's serious questions as to whether we'll ever be able to do it.
It's much scientifically safer to approach these things with very specific hypothesis in mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30113576</id>
	<title>NSDAP gene analysis</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258371720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The company is a bit late to the market, also wrong country. They would have been hugely profitable in the late 1930's Germany, helping to refine the pure-blooded nordic population.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The company is a bit late to the market , also wrong country .
They would have been hugely profitable in the late 1930 's Germany , helping to refine the pure-blooded nordic population .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The company is a bit late to the market, also wrong country.
They would have been hugely profitable in the late 1930's Germany, helping to refine the pure-blooded nordic population.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30113968</id>
	<title>This is not a new idea</title>
	<author>talyene</author>
	<datestamp>1258376820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is nothing new.

In some ultra-orthodox Jewish circles, organisations exist that will take a blood sample and tell you if you're a carrier of some hereditary disease such as Tay Sachs that could produce a child with the illness if you were to have a child with a another carrier.

In the case of Tay Sachs, this is really critical as most newborns don't survive beyond the first few weeks and this causes incredible emotional stress for the parents.

When a potential match is suggested, a check is made with the organisation to check if you're genetically compatible from a hereditary disease perspective.  If you're not compatible, you never meet and therefore avoid and heartache later on.

While DNA compatibility isn't necessarily full proof (the company in the article seem to be completely ignoring phenotype - i.e. how your DNA actually expresses itself when you're born, e.g. a DNA test may show you to have the ginger hair gene, but it may be recessive and never show itself), it could help people who subscribe to the service avoid the same issues.

There's still a lot to be said for actually meeting the person and seeing a) if you get along with them and b) if there's an attraction.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is nothing new .
In some ultra-orthodox Jewish circles , organisations exist that will take a blood sample and tell you if you 're a carrier of some hereditary disease such as Tay Sachs that could produce a child with the illness if you were to have a child with a another carrier .
In the case of Tay Sachs , this is really critical as most newborns do n't survive beyond the first few weeks and this causes incredible emotional stress for the parents .
When a potential match is suggested , a check is made with the organisation to check if you 're genetically compatible from a hereditary disease perspective .
If you 're not compatible , you never meet and therefore avoid and heartache later on .
While DNA compatibility is n't necessarily full proof ( the company in the article seem to be completely ignoring phenotype - i.e .
how your DNA actually expresses itself when you 're born , e.g .
a DNA test may show you to have the ginger hair gene , but it may be recessive and never show itself ) , it could help people who subscribe to the service avoid the same issues .
There 's still a lot to be said for actually meeting the person and seeing a ) if you get along with them and b ) if there 's an attraction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is nothing new.
In some ultra-orthodox Jewish circles, organisations exist that will take a blood sample and tell you if you're a carrier of some hereditary disease such as Tay Sachs that could produce a child with the illness if you were to have a child with a another carrier.
In the case of Tay Sachs, this is really critical as most newborns don't survive beyond the first few weeks and this causes incredible emotional stress for the parents.
When a potential match is suggested, a check is made with the organisation to check if you're genetically compatible from a hereditary disease perspective.
If you're not compatible, you never meet and therefore avoid and heartache later on.
While DNA compatibility isn't necessarily full proof (the company in the article seem to be completely ignoring phenotype - i.e.
how your DNA actually expresses itself when you're born, e.g.
a DNA test may show you to have the ginger hair gene, but it may be recessive and never show itself), it could help people who subscribe to the service avoid the same issues.
There's still a lot to be said for actually meeting the person and seeing a) if you get along with them and b) if there's an attraction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109260</id>
	<title>Re:Bias Filtering</title>
	<author>andy1307</author>
	<datestamp>1258282440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>as if analyst</p></div>
</blockquote><p>

If you're doing it anally, your chances of procreation are not very high.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>as if analyst If you 're doing it anally , your chances of procreation are not very high .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as if analyst


If you're doing it anally, your chances of procreation are not very high.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109688</id>
	<title>I don't need DNA testing...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258285500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...to know that when it comes to dating I come up an <a href="http://ex.susd.org/sjones/gattaca\_files/image005.jpg" title="susd.org" rel="nofollow">in-valid.</a> [susd.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...to know that when it comes to dating I come up an in-valid .
[ susd.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...to know that when it comes to dating I come up an in-valid.
[susd.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30114632</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm...</title>
	<author>dontmakemethink</author>
	<datestamp>1258383480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Begun, the Clone War has.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Begun , the Clone War has .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Begun, the Clone War has.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107862</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110522</id>
	<title>To paraphrase...</title>
	<author>faedle</author>
	<datestamp>1258291560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One more group of women who won't have sex with me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One more group of women who wo n't have sex with me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One more group of women who won't have sex with me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107834</id>
	<title>The company name is kind of disturbing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258316940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Incest Is Best Inc"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Incest Is Best Inc "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Incest Is Best Inc"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108298</id>
	<title>The Olfactory Web</title>
	<author>Darth Cider</author>
	<datestamp>1258275960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is why the HTML 6 specification will include an olfactory tag, so that biologically compatible people can agree or disagree on the basis of body odor, rather than the meaning of their words. The W3C is also considering the inclusion of an IQ tag, to further facilitate meaningful communication. It is hoped that an advanced markup system will improve the basic functionality of the internet, while also mitigating many of the problems associated with the wrong people getting together online, for understandable but regrettable reasons. The W3C considers the biggest preventable threat to tomorrow's information exchange to be the population of children born as a result of those unfortunate online hookups.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why the HTML 6 specification will include an olfactory tag , so that biologically compatible people can agree or disagree on the basis of body odor , rather than the meaning of their words .
The W3C is also considering the inclusion of an IQ tag , to further facilitate meaningful communication .
It is hoped that an advanced markup system will improve the basic functionality of the internet , while also mitigating many of the problems associated with the wrong people getting together online , for understandable but regrettable reasons .
The W3C considers the biggest preventable threat to tomorrow 's information exchange to be the population of children born as a result of those unfortunate online hookups .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why the HTML 6 specification will include an olfactory tag, so that biologically compatible people can agree or disagree on the basis of body odor, rather than the meaning of their words.
The W3C is also considering the inclusion of an IQ tag, to further facilitate meaningful communication.
It is hoped that an advanced markup system will improve the basic functionality of the internet, while also mitigating many of the problems associated with the wrong people getting together online, for understandable but regrettable reasons.
The W3C considers the biggest preventable threat to tomorrow's information exchange to be the population of children born as a result of those unfortunate online hookups.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108260</id>
	<title>Finally!!!</title>
	<author>hackstraw</author>
	<datestamp>1258275780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My anti-social personality and my not desiring long walks on the beach can find me a mate!</p><p>Seriously, I have trouble dating and I've thought about using one of these services, but there is more to a person than their DNA.  Plus, we can see much of people's dna from "interviewing" them and their family.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My anti-social personality and my not desiring long walks on the beach can find me a mate ! Seriously , I have trouble dating and I 've thought about using one of these services , but there is more to a person than their DNA .
Plus , we can see much of people 's dna from " interviewing " them and their family .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My anti-social personality and my not desiring long walks on the beach can find me a mate!Seriously, I have trouble dating and I've thought about using one of these services, but there is more to a person than their DNA.
Plus, we can see much of people's dna from "interviewing" them and their family.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30117736</id>
	<title>Maggie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258396740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So eugenics is the new cool thing again?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So eugenics is the new cool thing again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So eugenics is the new cool thing again?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30130654</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm...</title>
	<author>balaband</author>
	<datestamp>1258481100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, those are really nice kidneys you got there...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , those are really nice kidneys you got there.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, those are really nice kidneys you got there...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107862</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108040</id>
	<title>So much bunk?</title>
	<author>Quantos</author>
	<datestamp>1258317780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's like saying that your best match is someone who drinks the same brand of beer that you do.<br>
People are best matched with other people that they can get along with and talk to, we all know this.  Just because the DNA profile is similar doesn't mean that they will enjoy the same things.  It's life experiences and how we respond and come through them that make us what we are.<br> <br>
They would be better off saying that they will match you with people who have a similar upraising.  Even that raises flags though.  Matching two people based on addictive or abused pasts would usually not be good for their children.<br> <br>

Face it, we are far better off just finding our own mates and leaving the corporations out of it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's like saying that your best match is someone who drinks the same brand of beer that you do .
People are best matched with other people that they can get along with and talk to , we all know this .
Just because the DNA profile is similar does n't mean that they will enjoy the same things .
It 's life experiences and how we respond and come through them that make us what we are .
They would be better off saying that they will match you with people who have a similar upraising .
Even that raises flags though .
Matching two people based on addictive or abused pasts would usually not be good for their children .
Face it , we are far better off just finding our own mates and leaving the corporations out of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's like saying that your best match is someone who drinks the same brand of beer that you do.
People are best matched with other people that they can get along with and talk to, we all know this.
Just because the DNA profile is similar doesn't mean that they will enjoy the same things.
It's life experiences and how we respond and come through them that make us what we are.
They would be better off saying that they will match you with people who have a similar upraising.
Even that raises flags though.
Matching two people based on addictive or abused pasts would usually not be good for their children.
Face it, we are far better off just finding our own mates and leaving the corporations out of it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108250</id>
	<title>Don't tell me:</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1258275720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>PTBarnum.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>PTBarnum.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PTBarnum.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30118568</id>
	<title>blood-type matching popular in Japan</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1258399260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The fad of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood\_types\_in\_Japanese\_culture" title="wikipedia.org"> blood type matching in Japan </a> [wikipedia.org] seems odd to me.  But it sounds like a precursor of genetic matching.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The fad of blood type matching in Japan [ wikipedia.org ] seems odd to me .
But it sounds like a precursor of genetic matching .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fad of  blood type matching in Japan  [wikipedia.org] seems odd to me.
But it sounds like a precursor of genetic matching.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108134</id>
	<title>99.9\% match!</title>
	<author>Tiger4</author>
	<datestamp>1258318320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Watch those match algorithms.  This could prove to be a rather disturbing way to meet your long lost sibling.

OTOH it could make a Great Jerry Springer / Dr Phil episode.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Watch those match algorithms .
This could prove to be a rather disturbing way to meet your long lost sibling .
OTOH it could make a Great Jerry Springer / Dr Phil episode .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watch those match algorithms.
This could prove to be a rather disturbing way to meet your long lost sibling.
OTOH it could make a Great Jerry Springer / Dr Phil episode.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111428</id>
	<title>Asian women.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258300440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok, well I'm a white guy, and I like Asian (Japanese, and some (South) Korean) women.  I find them far more attractive than the majority of American women.</p><p>So does that mean that this service wouldn't work well for me?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , well I 'm a white guy , and I like Asian ( Japanese , and some ( South ) Korean ) women .
I find them far more attractive than the majority of American women.So does that mean that this service would n't work well for me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, well I'm a white guy, and I like Asian (Japanese, and some (South) Korean) women.
I find them far more attractive than the majority of American women.So does that mean that this service wouldn't work well for me?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108634</id>
	<title>Re:Untrue</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1258278000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's funny is that the only remotely possible claim is "healthier children".</p><p>And it's easier to do a family medical history than to run the<br>stack of gene tests which would give you the same information.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's funny is that the only remotely possible claim is " healthier children " .And it 's easier to do a family medical history than to run thestack of gene tests which would give you the same information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's funny is that the only remotely possible claim is "healthier children".And it's easier to do a family medical history than to run thestack of gene tests which would give you the same information.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111472</id>
	<title>...So in other words its Arranged Marriages again.</title>
	<author>Bob\_Who</author>
	<datestamp>1258300920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... the science may progress, but the sociology remains cyclical.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... the science may progress , but the sociology remains cyclical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... the science may progress, but the sociology remains cyclical.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109006</id>
	<title>Re:Building up a smell/looks/DNA database</title>
	<author>Taur0</author>
	<datestamp>1258280460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I highly doubt this would work. Smell works in combination of a lot of different factors. We are not programmed to judge the compatibility of a mate based solely on smell, but once they pass the other checks, smell adds some unconscious warning or encouragement. Asking people to judge someone in the dark would be asking for them to consciously judge the smell, which would result in a totally different effect.

The better test would be to somehow have 1 person for each sex and somehow make them give off scents of others, then see if their ratings go up on average depending on the smell. Of course this is also flawed, you'd never really be able to replicate the entire smell and the signs the brain is looking for are incredibly small. It wouldn't be surprising if a difference in immune system proteins and anitbodies manifests itself in some other signs as well, voice, appearance, skin tone and complexion.

Basically, there are too many factors. But I suppose that's true for all social sciences, and that's never stopped them yet!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I highly doubt this would work .
Smell works in combination of a lot of different factors .
We are not programmed to judge the compatibility of a mate based solely on smell , but once they pass the other checks , smell adds some unconscious warning or encouragement .
Asking people to judge someone in the dark would be asking for them to consciously judge the smell , which would result in a totally different effect .
The better test would be to somehow have 1 person for each sex and somehow make them give off scents of others , then see if their ratings go up on average depending on the smell .
Of course this is also flawed , you 'd never really be able to replicate the entire smell and the signs the brain is looking for are incredibly small .
It would n't be surprising if a difference in immune system proteins and anitbodies manifests itself in some other signs as well , voice , appearance , skin tone and complexion .
Basically , there are too many factors .
But I suppose that 's true for all social sciences , and that 's never stopped them yet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I highly doubt this would work.
Smell works in combination of a lot of different factors.
We are not programmed to judge the compatibility of a mate based solely on smell, but once they pass the other checks, smell adds some unconscious warning or encouragement.
Asking people to judge someone in the dark would be asking for them to consciously judge the smell, which would result in a totally different effect.
The better test would be to somehow have 1 person for each sex and somehow make them give off scents of others, then see if their ratings go up on average depending on the smell.
Of course this is also flawed, you'd never really be able to replicate the entire smell and the signs the brain is looking for are incredibly small.
It wouldn't be surprising if a difference in immune system proteins and anitbodies manifests itself in some other signs as well, voice, appearance, skin tone and complexion.
Basically, there are too many factors.
But I suppose that's true for all social sciences, and that's never stopped them yet!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111562</id>
	<title>Re:Untrue</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258301640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I volunteer to test the first claim!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I volunteer to test the first claim !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I volunteer to test the first claim!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30119350</id>
	<title>Re:The company name is kind of disturbing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258401540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>well if was the near the same kind of DNA it would be a close realtive. Yuck</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>well if was the near the same kind of DNA it would be a close realtive .
Yuck</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well if was the near the same kind of DNA it would be a close realtive.
Yuck</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107834</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108478</id>
	<title>Re:Matching DNA? Oh, sweet...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258277040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Blue bloods have been doing it for centuries.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Blue bloods have been doing it for centuries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blue bloods have been doing it for centuries.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30119154</id>
	<title>Really...</title>
	<author>OpenSourced</author>
	<datestamp>1258401060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would like to read the disclaimer you have to sign to become a client. Something like "Any relationship between us and people that know what they are doing, is purely coincidental".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would like to read the disclaimer you have to sign to become a client .
Something like " Any relationship between us and people that know what they are doing , is purely coincidental " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would like to read the disclaimer you have to sign to become a client.
Something like "Any relationship between us and people that know what they are doing, is purely coincidental".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108468</id>
	<title>great</title>
	<author>nomadic</author>
	<datestamp>1258276980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So I have to deal with a woman who is genetically predisposed to act like me?  No thanks, I couldn't deal with a lifetime of myself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So I have to deal with a woman who is genetically predisposed to act like me ?
No thanks , I could n't deal with a lifetime of myself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I have to deal with a woman who is genetically predisposed to act like me?
No thanks, I couldn't deal with a lifetime of myself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109662</id>
	<title>Re:Untrue</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258285320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's a difference between lying and being wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a difference between lying and being wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a difference between lying and being wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109608</id>
	<title>Re:Better children</title>
	<author>quarterbuck</author>
	<datestamp>1258284900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This should theoretically produce exact opposite effects.Nazi Germans were pairing people based on similar physical characteristics. In as much as looks correlate with geographical origins and geographical origins with disease resistance, they were pairing people with similar immunities.   <br>

People born in different parts of the world should theoretically have very different immune systems. One example  is the case of Native Americans who had no immunity to continental diseases and were almost wiped out when Europeans landed with TB and other diseases. In reverse, Europe was exposed to plague (from mid east?) and Syphilis (mostly American) but managed to survive after losing half the population . Sickle cell anemia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sickle-cell\_disease) is prevalent in Africa, but it also provides resistance to malaria. People born outside Africa rarely get Malaria and sickle cell anemia is not common outside tropics.<br>

So if your pair people based on different immune systems you should also end up picking people who are of very different racial characteristics. A blonde, blue eyed European would be paired with an Alaskan and an African with a Japanese. At least this would have been the case if we did the pairing in 16th century. I am not sure how this works today, since almost all diseases are now spread globally and most people have some amount of immunity to most of them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This should theoretically produce exact opposite effects.Nazi Germans were pairing people based on similar physical characteristics .
In as much as looks correlate with geographical origins and geographical origins with disease resistance , they were pairing people with similar immunities .
People born in different parts of the world should theoretically have very different immune systems .
One example is the case of Native Americans who had no immunity to continental diseases and were almost wiped out when Europeans landed with TB and other diseases .
In reverse , Europe was exposed to plague ( from mid east ?
) and Syphilis ( mostly American ) but managed to survive after losing half the population .
Sickle cell anemia ( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sickle-cell \ _disease ) is prevalent in Africa , but it also provides resistance to malaria .
People born outside Africa rarely get Malaria and sickle cell anemia is not common outside tropics .
So if your pair people based on different immune systems you should also end up picking people who are of very different racial characteristics .
A blonde , blue eyed European would be paired with an Alaskan and an African with a Japanese .
At least this would have been the case if we did the pairing in 16th century .
I am not sure how this works today , since almost all diseases are now spread globally and most people have some amount of immunity to most of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This should theoretically produce exact opposite effects.Nazi Germans were pairing people based on similar physical characteristics.
In as much as looks correlate with geographical origins and geographical origins with disease resistance, they were pairing people with similar immunities.
People born in different parts of the world should theoretically have very different immune systems.
One example  is the case of Native Americans who had no immunity to continental diseases and were almost wiped out when Europeans landed with TB and other diseases.
In reverse, Europe was exposed to plague (from mid east?
) and Syphilis (mostly American) but managed to survive after losing half the population .
Sickle cell anemia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sickle-cell\_disease) is prevalent in Africa, but it also provides resistance to malaria.
People born outside Africa rarely get Malaria and sickle cell anemia is not common outside tropics.
So if your pair people based on different immune systems you should also end up picking people who are of very different racial characteristics.
A blonde, blue eyed European would be paired with an Alaskan and an African with a Japanese.
At least this would have been the case if we did the pairing in 16th century.
I am not sure how this works today, since almost all diseases are now spread globally and most people have some amount of immunity to most of them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108666</id>
	<title>Re:Matching DNA? Oh, sweet...</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1258278180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And here I thought Smurfs were only a cartoon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And here I thought Smurfs were only a cartoon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And here I thought Smurfs were only a cartoon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108430</id>
	<title>Perhaps even</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1258276800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Healthier children is the only thing that could be possible improved there for me. The rest look more related to culture (education, environment, etc) things than to genetic ones. And they put it in the last place, even doubting that it could happen.<br><br>Of course, if both deeply believe what they said (won't be so different from any "predicted" match coming from tea leaves, astrology, dices, numerology and reading hand lines) there are a chance that it will happens, and that is cultural too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Healthier children is the only thing that could be possible improved there for me .
The rest look more related to culture ( education , environment , etc ) things than to genetic ones .
And they put it in the last place , even doubting that it could happen.Of course , if both deeply believe what they said ( wo n't be so different from any " predicted " match coming from tea leaves , astrology , dices , numerology and reading hand lines ) there are a chance that it will happens , and that is cultural too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Healthier children is the only thing that could be possible improved there for me.
The rest look more related to culture (education, environment, etc) things than to genetic ones.
And they put it in the last place, even doubting that it could happen.Of course, if both deeply believe what they said (won't be so different from any "predicted" match coming from tea leaves, astrology, dices, numerology and reading hand lines) there are a chance that it will happens, and that is cultural too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110718</id>
	<title>Re:So much bunk?</title>
	<author>GravityStar</author>
	<datestamp>1258293600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As far as the genes are concerned, opposites attract. And yes, when both partners have dissimilar genes, there is a lowered chance of extra-marital affairs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As far as the genes are concerned , opposites attract .
And yes , when both partners have dissimilar genes , there is a lowered chance of extra-marital affairs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As far as the genes are concerned, opposites attract.
And yes, when both partners have dissimilar genes, there is a lowered chance of extra-marital affairs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109158</id>
	<title>Re:Untrue</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258281660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What's funny is that the only remotely possible claim is "healthier children".</p></div><p>What's funnier is that genetic diversity leads to healthy children, not genetic similarity.</p><p>There is a reason why mixed babies are so damn attractive, and why you aren't supposed to marry your cousin.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's funny is that the only remotely possible claim is " healthier children " .What 's funnier is that genetic diversity leads to healthy children , not genetic similarity.There is a reason why mixed babies are so damn attractive , and why you are n't supposed to marry your cousin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's funny is that the only remotely possible claim is "healthier children".What's funnier is that genetic diversity leads to healthy children, not genetic similarity.There is a reason why mixed babies are so damn attractive, and why you aren't supposed to marry your cousin.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108074</id>
	<title>Opposites Attract</title>
	<author>dcollins117</author>
	<datestamp>1258317900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think I would ever want to date anyone who even remotely resembles me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think I would ever want to date anyone who even remotely resembles me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think I would ever want to date anyone who even remotely resembles me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111892</id>
	<title>The Only Site Fit for the Job</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258305240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I will start caring as soon as the DNA test results are factored into my OKcupid match score.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I will start caring as soon as the DNA test results are factored into my OKcupid match score .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I will start caring as soon as the DNA test results are factored into my OKcupid match score.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108434</id>
	<title>Re:Building up a smell/looks/DNA database</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258276800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"-Let the males and females smell each other one by one (in rooms so dark that beauty could be eliminated) and have them rate each other."

Oh, this is going to end badly...</htmltext>
<tokenext>" -Let the males and females smell each other one by one ( in rooms so dark that beauty could be eliminated ) and have them rate each other .
" Oh , this is going to end badly.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"-Let the males and females smell each other one by one (in rooms so dark that beauty could be eliminated) and have them rate each other.
"

Oh, this is going to end badly...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110730</id>
	<title>Re:I didn't RTFA</title>
	<author>radtea</author>
	<datestamp>1258293720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>has been distilled into an online dating site. </i></p><p>This isn't a "dating" site, it's a "mating" site, presumably aimed primarily at people under 30 or so who want to hook up for life with a single partner they intend to have children with.  That's not "dating", which is spending time in the company of a member of the complementary sexual orientation, possibly naked, for pleasure (social, sexual, whatever).</p><p>If you're going to call "singled minded pursuit of a suitable life-partner" "dating", then we need another word for "spending enjoyable time with someone who may or may not be a potential life partner but who's fun to be with."</p><p>And the real problem is that if you think that the only point of dating is mating, you're missing out all of the social and relationship learning that goes on during dating.  Some of my best times have been spent with women I knew from very early on had no potential as a life-partner, and those experiences taught me a great deal about myself and what works for me and doesn't in a relationship.  Dating is an instance where the journey itself is an important part of the goal, and there is no other way to learn what you need except by actually taking the long way.</p><p>Women, in my experience, really do tend to view every date as a potential step toward marriage or a long-term relationship, and tend to drop men when they feel things are "not going anywhere" (which means "not heading in the direction of marriage".)  This is a silly attitude that seems to have been reified by this site.  Dating only potential life partners is like companies that focus all of their resources on a few big customers, which is known to be a bad long-term strategy for a sustainable business.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>has been distilled into an online dating site .
This is n't a " dating " site , it 's a " mating " site , presumably aimed primarily at people under 30 or so who want to hook up for life with a single partner they intend to have children with .
That 's not " dating " , which is spending time in the company of a member of the complementary sexual orientation , possibly naked , for pleasure ( social , sexual , whatever ) .If you 're going to call " singled minded pursuit of a suitable life-partner " " dating " , then we need another word for " spending enjoyable time with someone who may or may not be a potential life partner but who 's fun to be with .
" And the real problem is that if you think that the only point of dating is mating , you 're missing out all of the social and relationship learning that goes on during dating .
Some of my best times have been spent with women I knew from very early on had no potential as a life-partner , and those experiences taught me a great deal about myself and what works for me and does n't in a relationship .
Dating is an instance where the journey itself is an important part of the goal , and there is no other way to learn what you need except by actually taking the long way.Women , in my experience , really do tend to view every date as a potential step toward marriage or a long-term relationship , and tend to drop men when they feel things are " not going anywhere " ( which means " not heading in the direction of marriage " .
) This is a silly attitude that seems to have been reified by this site .
Dating only potential life partners is like companies that focus all of their resources on a few big customers , which is known to be a bad long-term strategy for a sustainable business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>has been distilled into an online dating site.
This isn't a "dating" site, it's a "mating" site, presumably aimed primarily at people under 30 or so who want to hook up for life with a single partner they intend to have children with.
That's not "dating", which is spending time in the company of a member of the complementary sexual orientation, possibly naked, for pleasure (social, sexual, whatever).If you're going to call "singled minded pursuit of a suitable life-partner" "dating", then we need another word for "spending enjoyable time with someone who may or may not be a potential life partner but who's fun to be with.
"And the real problem is that if you think that the only point of dating is mating, you're missing out all of the social and relationship learning that goes on during dating.
Some of my best times have been spent with women I knew from very early on had no potential as a life-partner, and those experiences taught me a great deal about myself and what works for me and doesn't in a relationship.
Dating is an instance where the journey itself is an important part of the goal, and there is no other way to learn what you need except by actually taking the long way.Women, in my experience, really do tend to view every date as a potential step toward marriage or a long-term relationship, and tend to drop men when they feel things are "not going anywhere" (which means "not heading in the direction of marriage".
)  This is a silly attitude that seems to have been reified by this site.
Dating only potential life partners is like companies that focus all of their resources on a few big customers, which is known to be a bad long-term strategy for a sustainable business.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111480</id>
	<title>Re:Wait wait...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258300980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, hypothetically, if someone were to get a job there, or just hack in, they could rig results to set themselves up as a perfect match for every hot chick that walked in the door? Slashdot competition!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , hypothetically , if someone were to get a job there , or just hack in , they could rig results to set themselves up as a perfect match for every hot chick that walked in the door ?
Slashdot competition !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, hypothetically, if someone were to get a job there, or just hack in, they could rig results to set themselves up as a perfect match for every hot chick that walked in the door?
Slashdot competition!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30112380</id>
	<title>As if...</title>
	<author>jojo78</author>
	<datestamp>1258311480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dating wasn't hard enough.</p><p>Woman: "I love that fact that you're successful in your career..."</p><p>Man: "I hate the fact that your grandfather had green eyes..."</p><p>Woman: "Well played sir..."</p><p>Man: "Check please..."</p><p>Then the abomination that is this date goes home to compare notes on blood sample preservation methods.</p><p>The best part was the wine...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dating was n't hard enough.Woman : " I love that fact that you 're successful in your career... " Man : " I hate the fact that your grandfather had green eyes... " Woman : " Well played sir... " Man : " Check please... " Then the abomination that is this date goes home to compare notes on blood sample preservation methods.The best part was the wine.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dating wasn't hard enough.Woman: "I love that fact that you're successful in your career..."Man: "I hate the fact that your grandfather had green eyes..."Woman: "Well played sir..."Man: "Check please..."Then the abomination that is this date goes home to compare notes on blood sample preservation methods.The best part was the wine...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107984</id>
	<title>great</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258317540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>where do i send my load so i can become part of this dna dating website. usually i just send it onto the ceiling, but now i hope i can send it somewhere useful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>where do i send my load so i can become part of this dna dating website .
usually i just send it onto the ceiling , but now i hope i can send it somewhere useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>where do i send my load so i can become part of this dna dating website.
usually i just send it onto the ceiling, but now i hope i can send it somewhere useful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107974</id>
	<title>Wait wait...</title>
	<author>Manip</author>
	<datestamp>1258317480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see a HUGE hole in this plan... So we can take DNA and build an incomplete profile of it. They want to use these limited profiles to match people for dating.</p><p>But what metric are they going to use to match people?</p><p>If they plan to match similar DNA then I question that since studies have shown that we're attracted to people with different immune systems.</p><p>If they plan to match people with very different DNA then I question that because there might be a huge culture clash.</p><p>If they plan to match people with very similar but slightly different DNA then how is that better than hobbies and or interests?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see a HUGE hole in this plan... So we can take DNA and build an incomplete profile of it .
They want to use these limited profiles to match people for dating.But what metric are they going to use to match people ? If they plan to match similar DNA then I question that since studies have shown that we 're attracted to people with different immune systems.If they plan to match people with very different DNA then I question that because there might be a huge culture clash.If they plan to match people with very similar but slightly different DNA then how is that better than hobbies and or interests ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see a HUGE hole in this plan... So we can take DNA and build an incomplete profile of it.
They want to use these limited profiles to match people for dating.But what metric are they going to use to match people?If they plan to match similar DNA then I question that since studies have shown that we're attracted to people with different immune systems.If they plan to match people with very different DNA then I question that because there might be a huge culture clash.If they plan to match people with very similar but slightly different DNA then how is that better than hobbies and or interests?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109004</id>
	<title>Re:Gattaca?</title>
	<author>anomnomnomymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258280400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A cat tag!</htmltext>
<tokenext>A cat tag !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A cat tag!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108390</id>
	<title>Will health insurance use this to get pre-existing</title>
	<author>Joe The Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1258276560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will health insurance use this to get a nice pre-existing conditions list and black list you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will health insurance use this to get a nice pre-existing conditions list and black list you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will health insurance use this to get a nice pre-existing conditions list and black list you?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109172</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258281720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>indeed, I have distributed quite a lot of copies of my DNA...hairbrush, clothes, pillows, and even quite a quantity of kleenex...(just half copies this time though)</htmltext>
<tokenext>indeed , I have distributed quite a lot of copies of my DNA...hairbrush , clothes , pillows , and even quite a quantity of kleenex... ( just half copies this time though )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>indeed, I have distributed quite a lot of copies of my DNA...hairbrush, clothes, pillows, and even quite a quantity of kleenex...(just half copies this time though)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110542</id>
	<title>They're right!</title>
	<author>Swave An deBwoner</author>
	<datestamp>1258291740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm very attracted to the natural body odors of many females and I'm sure that they have different HLA stuffs than me (whatever that is).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm very attracted to the natural body odors of many females and I 'm sure that they have different HLA stuffs than me ( whatever that is ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm very attracted to the natural body odors of many females and I'm sure that they have different HLA stuffs than me (whatever that is).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109026</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm...</title>
	<author>ikegami</author>
	<datestamp>1258280580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>But what about the idea that information MUST BE FREE?</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>Information <em>wants</em> to be free. The claims refers to any and all of the following facts:

</p><ul>
<li>
<p>When information is shared, the sharer loses none of the information.</p></li>

<li>
<p>The cost of sharing information information is next to nil if not nil. It is an infinite good. In a free market, it's price WILL go down to zero (regardless of whether you think it SHOULD or not).</p></li>

<li>
<p>Information sharing almost always benefits society.</p></li>

</ul><p>But <em>must</em> information be free? No, not always. There is value in privacy, for example. So while your DNA information "wants to be free" doesn't mean you should "let it free".

</p><p>-----

</p><p>You might be wondering how there can exist privacy if information wants to be free.

</p><p>Notice that I said the cost of information will drop to nothing <em>in a free market</em>. Privacy can exist by hindering the market for information deemed private. One means of achieving this is through the creation of laws that (artifically) raise the cost of the information (by imposing penalities for inappropriately sharing and using the information).

</p><p>Unfortunately, the legal landscape has not yet dealt with DNA sharing in any serious manner. For now, all you can do is hide your DNA. Once it's known by someone else, it's outside your control.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But what about the idea that information MUST BE FREE ?
Information wants to be free .
The claims refers to any and all of the following facts : When information is shared , the sharer loses none of the information .
The cost of sharing information information is next to nil if not nil .
It is an infinite good .
In a free market , it 's price WILL go down to zero ( regardless of whether you think it SHOULD or not ) .
Information sharing almost always benefits society .
But must information be free ?
No , not always .
There is value in privacy , for example .
So while your DNA information " wants to be free " does n't mean you should " let it free " .
----- You might be wondering how there can exist privacy if information wants to be free .
Notice that I said the cost of information will drop to nothing in a free market .
Privacy can exist by hindering the market for information deemed private .
One means of achieving this is through the creation of laws that ( artifically ) raise the cost of the information ( by imposing penalities for inappropriately sharing and using the information ) .
Unfortunately , the legal landscape has not yet dealt with DNA sharing in any serious manner .
For now , all you can do is hide your DNA .
Once it 's known by someone else , it 's outside your control .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> But what about the idea that information MUST BE FREE?
Information wants to be free.
The claims refers to any and all of the following facts:



When information is shared, the sharer loses none of the information.
The cost of sharing information information is next to nil if not nil.
It is an infinite good.
In a free market, it's price WILL go down to zero (regardless of whether you think it SHOULD or not).
Information sharing almost always benefits society.
But must information be free?
No, not always.
There is value in privacy, for example.
So while your DNA information "wants to be free" doesn't mean you should "let it free".
-----

You might be wondering how there can exist privacy if information wants to be free.
Notice that I said the cost of information will drop to nothing in a free market.
Privacy can exist by hindering the market for information deemed private.
One means of achieving this is through the creation of laws that (artifically) raise the cost of the information (by imposing penalities for inappropriately sharing and using the information).
Unfortunately, the legal landscape has not yet dealt with DNA sharing in any serious manner.
For now, all you can do is hide your DNA.
Once it's known by someone else, it's outside your control.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108660</id>
	<title>What else might they use the DNA for?</title>
	<author>REALMAN</author>
	<datestamp>1258278180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After matching 100's of thousands they then have a nice database of DNA and names to sell to other companies. Want insurance? Sorry, your genetic profile shows a disposition towards cancer. Want a job? Sorry, your genetic profile shows a disposition towards violent behavior. Don't feel bad. You got a nice date didn't you? What? She got you drunk and stole your wallet? Tough break kiddo.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After matching 100 's of thousands they then have a nice database of DNA and names to sell to other companies .
Want insurance ?
Sorry , your genetic profile shows a disposition towards cancer .
Want a job ?
Sorry , your genetic profile shows a disposition towards violent behavior .
Do n't feel bad .
You got a nice date did n't you ?
What ? She got you drunk and stole your wallet ?
Tough break kiddo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After matching 100's of thousands they then have a nice database of DNA and names to sell to other companies.
Want insurance?
Sorry, your genetic profile shows a disposition towards cancer.
Want a job?
Sorry, your genetic profile shows a disposition towards violent behavior.
Don't feel bad.
You got a nice date didn't you?
What? She got you drunk and stole your wallet?
Tough break kiddo.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109684</id>
	<title>GATTACA (1997) music - Michael Nyman</title>
	<author>HollyMolly-1122</author>
	<datestamp>1258285440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ultimate movie to see about this subject
GATTACA (1997) music - Michael Nyman
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9fcHHOCBDg" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9fcHHOCBDg</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ultimate movie to see about this subject GATTACA ( 1997 ) music - Michael Nyman http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = u9fcHHOCBDg [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ultimate movie to see about this subject
GATTACA (1997) music - Michael Nyman
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9fcHHOCBDg [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108452</id>
	<title>Re:Matching DNA? Oh, sweet...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258276920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Southern States have already been offering that service for a long long time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Southern States have already been offering that service for a long long time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Southern States have already been offering that service for a long long time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107948</id>
	<title>oh and</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258317420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>it's only $1,995 for a lifetime membership!  they take credit cards!</htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's only $ 1,995 for a lifetime membership !
they take credit cards !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's only $1,995 for a lifetime membership!
they take credit cards!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30112230</id>
	<title>In-breeding!!!</title>
	<author>zary</author>
	<datestamp>1258309560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OOOH, OOOH, Great Idea!!

We can have in-bred mutant babies much easier now!</htmltext>
<tokenext>OOOH , OOOH , Great Idea ! !
We can have in-bred mutant babies much easier now !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OOOH, OOOH, Great Idea!!
We can have in-bred mutant babies much easier now!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108640</id>
	<title>Re:Wait wait...</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1258278060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they did they usual personality matching, then filtered those matches (usually hundreds) through genetic testing (to detect different immune classes; a supposed basis for pheromone attraction), it might be useful.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they did they usual personality matching , then filtered those matches ( usually hundreds ) through genetic testing ( to detect different immune classes ; a supposed basis for pheromone attraction ) , it might be useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they did they usual personality matching, then filtered those matches (usually hundreds) through genetic testing (to detect different immune classes; a supposed basis for pheromone attraction), it might be useful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107924</id>
	<title>Gattaca, here we come!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258317300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That reminds me, I need to buy a keyboard vacuum..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That reminds me , I need to buy a keyboard vacuum. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That reminds me, I need to buy a keyboard vacuum..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108818</id>
	<title>1,995.95 to signup to this rod fest.</title>
	<author>ttroutma</author>
	<datestamp>1258279080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't imagine that women would be attracted to this service.
Add the 1,995.95 fee to that and the pool of users is going to be horribly
selected for very rational white males.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't imagine that women would be attracted to this service .
Add the 1,995.95 fee to that and the pool of users is going to be horribly selected for very rational white males .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't imagine that women would be attracted to this service.
Add the 1,995.95 fee to that and the pool of users is going to be horribly
selected for very rational white males.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108654</id>
	<title>Offensive!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258278120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm the inbred, last member of the house of Habsburg, you insensitive clod!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm the inbred , last member of the house of Habsburg , you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm the inbred, last member of the house of Habsburg, you insensitive clod!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30112542</id>
	<title>the golden rule</title>
	<author>ILuvRamen</author>
	<datestamp>1258313820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Okay, here's what they're missing.  This is the golden rule of dating sites.  It doesn't matter if you're physically attracted to a person like crazy if they're a complete bitch or asshole.  It really does boil down to that.  They can be good looking and a superior genetic match and healthier and blah blah blah but if you can't stand the person or their personality or they're just an awful person, I bet it won't work out real well!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , here 's what they 're missing .
This is the golden rule of dating sites .
It does n't matter if you 're physically attracted to a person like crazy if they 're a complete bitch or asshole .
It really does boil down to that .
They can be good looking and a superior genetic match and healthier and blah blah blah but if you ca n't stand the person or their personality or they 're just an awful person , I bet it wo n't work out real well !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, here's what they're missing.
This is the golden rule of dating sites.
It doesn't matter if you're physically attracted to a person like crazy if they're a complete bitch or asshole.
It really does boil down to that.
They can be good looking and a superior genetic match and healthier and blah blah blah but if you can't stand the person or their personality or they're just an awful person, I bet it won't work out real well!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110220</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258289520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know about you, but paying $1,995.95 for the privilege of submitting my DNA profile to a dating service seems kinda iffy. What happened to the dating sites that are free to the ladies and make men take it up the ass to show their desperation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about you , but paying $ 1,995.95 for the privilege of submitting my DNA profile to a dating service seems kinda iffy .
What happened to the dating sites that are free to the ladies and make men take it up the ass to show their desperation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about you, but paying $1,995.95 for the privilege of submitting my DNA profile to a dating service seems kinda iffy.
What happened to the dating sites that are free to the ladies and make men take it up the ass to show their desperation?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107862</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109474</id>
	<title>Re:Untrue</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258283940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd just be curious to see how correct they are about their theory.</p><p>"All your matches will activate your animal instinct to rape your mate, which they will enjoy, be exceptionally loyal to you and vice versa, and yield to healthy offspring."</p><p>hrmmm....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd just be curious to see how correct they are about their theory .
" All your matches will activate your animal instinct to rape your mate , which they will enjoy , be exceptionally loyal to you and vice versa , and yield to healthy offspring .
" hrmmm... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd just be curious to see how correct they are about their theory.
"All your matches will activate your animal instinct to rape your mate, which they will enjoy, be exceptionally loyal to you and vice versa, and yield to healthy offspring.
"hrmmm....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108504</id>
	<title>Why hello there</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258277220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1'52 tall Mongolian bride.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1'52 tall Mongolian bride .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1'52 tall Mongolian bride.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111988</id>
	<title>Re:Bias Filtering</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258306560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I also have a genetic low-vision condition I am trying to breed out of the family gene pool. i enjoy the process but so far all i got is a few could be screwed munchkins...perhaps this service can help me select a mate with a more dominant trait?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I also have a genetic low-vision condition I am trying to breed out of the family gene pool .
i enjoy the process but so far all i got is a few could be screwed munchkins...perhaps this service can help me select a mate with a more dominant trait ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I also have a genetic low-vision condition I am trying to breed out of the family gene pool.
i enjoy the process but so far all i got is a few could be screwed munchkins...perhaps this service can help me select a mate with a more dominant trait?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108970</id>
	<title>Wired</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258280100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I could swear this was in Wired once... As a joke.</p><p>After some searching through my collection: In the August 09 issue, in the 'Predict What's Next' section at the back, they had a thing about "Online Dating in the Future".</p><p>The above was basically just that O\_o</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I could swear this was in Wired once... As a joke.After some searching through my collection : In the August 09 issue , in the 'Predict What 's Next ' section at the back , they had a thing about " Online Dating in the Future " .The above was basically just that O \ _o</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could swear this was in Wired once... As a joke.After some searching through my collection: In the August 09 issue, in the 'Predict What's Next' section at the back, they had a thing about "Online Dating in the Future".The above was basically just that O\_o</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109810</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm...</title>
	<author>nEoN nOoDlE</author>
	<datestamp>1258286460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Your info will never be given to government agencies.</p></div><p>If the government wants to get into the match-making industry, more power to 'em!</p><p>Seriously, do you really think that anybody cares about your DNA information that much as to hack into this site? There's really nothing that your DNA can be used for that criminals or the government would even want it for at this point. You can't even perform identity theft with it! Is there really a large black market for this information? If someone really wanted your DNA, I'm sure they could get a good sample by going through your trash or other means. If the government starts collecting DNA from everybody, do you really think they're gonna go through a dating service as opposed to actually getting it from your doctor or from mandatory screenings? If we come to that point, you've already got bigger problems than this site giving up your information. So really, what could possibly go wrong here other than you going on a couple of crappy dates because DNA might not be a viable matchmaking opportunity?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your info will never be given to government agencies.If the government wants to get into the match-making industry , more power to 'em ! Seriously , do you really think that anybody cares about your DNA information that much as to hack into this site ?
There 's really nothing that your DNA can be used for that criminals or the government would even want it for at this point .
You ca n't even perform identity theft with it !
Is there really a large black market for this information ?
If someone really wanted your DNA , I 'm sure they could get a good sample by going through your trash or other means .
If the government starts collecting DNA from everybody , do you really think they 're gon na go through a dating service as opposed to actually getting it from your doctor or from mandatory screenings ?
If we come to that point , you 've already got bigger problems than this site giving up your information .
So really , what could possibly go wrong here other than you going on a couple of crappy dates because DNA might not be a viable matchmaking opportunity ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your info will never be given to government agencies.If the government wants to get into the match-making industry, more power to 'em!Seriously, do you really think that anybody cares about your DNA information that much as to hack into this site?
There's really nothing that your DNA can be used for that criminals or the government would even want it for at this point.
You can't even perform identity theft with it!
Is there really a large black market for this information?
If someone really wanted your DNA, I'm sure they could get a good sample by going through your trash or other means.
If the government starts collecting DNA from everybody, do you really think they're gonna go through a dating service as opposed to actually getting it from your doctor or from mandatory screenings?
If we come to that point, you've already got bigger problems than this site giving up your information.
So really, what could possibly go wrong here other than you going on a couple of crappy dates because DNA might not be a viable matchmaking opportunity?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107862</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110144</id>
	<title>Heinrich Himmler...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258288860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>your office is calling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>your office is calling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>your office is calling.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108046</id>
	<title>Matching DNA?  Oh, sweet...</title>
	<author>ibsteve2u</author>
	<datestamp>1258317780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...so you marry your long lost sister...</htmltext>
<tokenext>...so you marry your long lost sister.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...so you marry your long lost sister...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108882</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm...</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1258279500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Information is only free if you decide to give it away (i.e. hand someone a copy of your sheetmusic for you just-created song).  NOBODY has a right to take it from you through force.  If you want to give-away you DNA code, go ahead, but you should also have the right to keep it secret.</p><p>See the science movie Gattaca on the dangers of releasing your DNA to the wild.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Information is only free if you decide to give it away ( i.e .
hand someone a copy of your sheetmusic for you just-created song ) .
NOBODY has a right to take it from you through force .
If you want to give-away you DNA code , go ahead , but you should also have the right to keep it secret.See the science movie Gattaca on the dangers of releasing your DNA to the wild .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Information is only free if you decide to give it away (i.e.
hand someone a copy of your sheetmusic for you just-created song).
NOBODY has a right to take it from you through force.
If you want to give-away you DNA code, go ahead, but you should also have the right to keep it secret.See the science movie Gattaca on the dangers of releasing your DNA to the wild.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108406</id>
	<title>Culture vs. Genetics</title>
	<author>Butterforge</author>
	<datestamp>1258276620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry, but I will continue to subscribe to dating services that allow me to find like-minded individuals, because my education in anthropology has taught me that cultural traits like fidelity and political affiliation are not genetic.
<p>
Oops, did I just admit to using dating services?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , but I will continue to subscribe to dating services that allow me to find like-minded individuals , because my education in anthropology has taught me that cultural traits like fidelity and political affiliation are not genetic .
Oops , did I just admit to using dating services ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, but I will continue to subscribe to dating services that allow me to find like-minded individuals, because my education in anthropology has taught me that cultural traits like fidelity and political affiliation are not genetic.
Oops, did I just admit to using dating services?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107898</id>
	<title>So they Suck your Dick first???? PERFECT!</title>
	<author>Jackie\_Chan\_Fan</author>
	<datestamp>1258317180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DNA EXCHANGED!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DNA EXCHANGED !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DNA EXCHANGED!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109024</id>
	<title>Oooohhh... this is a bit frightening</title>
	<author>blind biker</author>
	<datestamp>1258280580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know others pointed this out already, but heck, real life is starting to look like Gattaca every day more and more, until we're all fucked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know others pointed this out already , but heck , real life is starting to look like Gattaca every day more and more , until we 're all fucked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know others pointed this out already, but heck, real life is starting to look like Gattaca every day more and more, until we're all fucked.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111940</id>
	<title>Re:Building up a smell/looks/DNA database</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258305900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Studies on portions of what you suggest have been done. It's been shown that menstruating women can identify men with compatible DNA (non-duplicate immunities and such) by smelling their sweat. While they find most male sweat to be disgusting, they tend to find the sweat of men with compatible DNA smells sweet and intoxicating. However during the rest of their cycle, no male sweat smells good to women.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Studies on portions of what you suggest have been done .
It 's been shown that menstruating women can identify men with compatible DNA ( non-duplicate immunities and such ) by smelling their sweat .
While they find most male sweat to be disgusting , they tend to find the sweat of men with compatible DNA smells sweet and intoxicating .
However during the rest of their cycle , no male sweat smells good to women .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Studies on portions of what you suggest have been done.
It's been shown that menstruating women can identify men with compatible DNA (non-duplicate immunities and such) by smelling their sweat.
While they find most male sweat to be disgusting, they tend to find the sweat of men with compatible DNA smells sweet and intoxicating.
However during the rest of their cycle, no male sweat smells good to women.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30113066</id>
	<title>genetics</title>
	<author>NightlordTW</author>
	<datestamp>1258364220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>or you could clone yourself and date it

btw, since when is it good to have many genes in common, I thought it rather ruins evolution</htmltext>
<tokenext>or you could clone yourself and date it btw , since when is it good to have many genes in common , I thought it rather ruins evolution</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or you could clone yourself and date it

btw, since when is it good to have many genes in common, I thought it rather ruins evolution</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109164</id>
	<title>Re:Bias Filtering</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258281660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you're an analrammer?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you 're an analrammer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you're an analrammer?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108672</id>
	<title>Business plan is doomed in the long run</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1258278240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The idea is that people tend to be attracted to those who have immune system genes that are dissimilar from their own.</p></div><p>In the long run, if the kids HLA genes were an average of the parents, wouldn't this doom their business plan, along with the human race, once everyone had the same HLA genes?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The idea is that people tend to be attracted to those who have immune system genes that are dissimilar from their own.In the long run , if the kids HLA genes were an average of the parents , would n't this doom their business plan , along with the human race , once everyone had the same HLA genes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The idea is that people tend to be attracted to those who have immune system genes that are dissimilar from their own.In the long run, if the kids HLA genes were an average of the parents, wouldn't this doom their business plan, along with the human race, once everyone had the same HLA genes?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111502</id>
	<title>Re:Finally!!!</title>
	<author>MosesJones</author>
	<datestamp>1258301100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Seriously, I have trouble dating</i></p><p>and</p><p><i>from "interviewing" them and their family</i></p><p>Now correlation is not causation but....... I'd suggest reducing the formal interview requirements for prospective dates and particularly don't insist on interviewing their family before considering them for a date.</p><p>Just a little hint....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , I have trouble datingandfrom " interviewing " them and their familyNow correlation is not causation but....... I 'd suggest reducing the formal interview requirements for prospective dates and particularly do n't insist on interviewing their family before considering them for a date.Just a little hint... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, I have trouble datingandfrom "interviewing" them and their familyNow correlation is not causation but....... I'd suggest reducing the formal interview requirements for prospective dates and particularly don't insist on interviewing their family before considering them for a date.Just a little hint....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108260</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30113116</id>
	<title>Badass = sexy</title>
	<author>DavMz</author>
	<datestamp>1258364820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The football team captain will get the girls.<br>This was "demonstrated" on a japanese tv show: they had one of the animators of the show and a stunt actor running for 10min to make them sweat and thus emit more pheromones, before putting them in separate boxes with a hole at chest level and had them removing their shirts. Then, six girls were asked to smell them and designate which was the most sexy (without knowing who was in which box). All six of them chose the stunt actor. Apparently, girls are attracted to "bad guys", because they would have more manly pheromones.<br>(Note: I am neither a biologist nor a native japanese speaker so I might have missed something...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The football team captain will get the girls.This was " demonstrated " on a japanese tv show : they had one of the animators of the show and a stunt actor running for 10min to make them sweat and thus emit more pheromones , before putting them in separate boxes with a hole at chest level and had them removing their shirts .
Then , six girls were asked to smell them and designate which was the most sexy ( without knowing who was in which box ) .
All six of them chose the stunt actor .
Apparently , girls are attracted to " bad guys " , because they would have more manly pheromones .
( Note : I am neither a biologist nor a native japanese speaker so I might have missed something... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The football team captain will get the girls.This was "demonstrated" on a japanese tv show: they had one of the animators of the show and a stunt actor running for 10min to make them sweat and thus emit more pheromones, before putting them in separate boxes with a hole at chest level and had them removing their shirts.
Then, six girls were asked to smell them and designate which was the most sexy (without knowing who was in which box).
All six of them chose the stunt actor.
Apparently, girls are attracted to "bad guys", because they would have more manly pheromones.
(Note: I am neither a biologist nor a native japanese speaker so I might have missed something...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108956</id>
	<title>Dating site matches people through E. coli tests</title>
	<author>David Gerard</author>
	<datestamp>1258280040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <b>KALLIKAK, Gattaca,</b> Saturday &mdash; Genetic testing companies are promising to match couples based on <i>Escherichia coli</i> testing, touting the benefits of biological compatibility and claiming a match means better personality match, better sex and conclusive proof that <a href="http://notnews.today.com/2009/11/15/dating-site-matches-people-through-e-coli-tests/" title="today.com">they match right down to the asshole</a> [today.com].

</p><p>"How many dating services can you think of where assholes can meet an asshole they really deserve?" said Eric Holzle, founder of AssholePersonalityDisorderMatch.com.

</p><p>People tend to be attracted to those whose personalities are appropriately complementary to their own. APDMatch claims to be able to ascertain this by scientifically measuring the characteristics of a prospective couple's digestive tracts.

</p><p>The <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (DSM-IV-TR) inexplicably fails to detail Asshole Personality Disorder. However, a diagnosis of APD requires five or more of the following to be present for a significant period of time:</p><ul> <li>Self-importance</li>
<li>Refusal to acknowledge or even comprehend social rules</li>
<li>Delusions of adequacy</li>
<li>Believes others would do just fine if only they were sensible like him</li>
<li>Beliefs appear to change to match the situation, but that's just other people being idiotic</li>
<li>Pride in their superior people skills</li>
<li>Recto-cranial inversion</li>
<li>Projection of all symptoms on this list onto those around them.</li>
</ul><p>"If we can make sure that assholes end up with other assholes," said Dr Holzle, "we can save the rest of us from dealing with their ridiculous bullshit."

</p><p>But don't put too much faith in this, experts said. Dr. Rocio Moran, medical director of the General Genetics Clinic at the Cleveland Clinic, called the idea "ridiculous," and said the science of assholism is too complex to work out by looking at a few bacterial traces.

</p><p>"They are just trying to make a buck," she said. "Focusing on getting those bucks from assholes is, of course, commendable. But assholism is subtle and endemic. How many times have you heard some asshole proclaim, 'hah, that really sticks it to those assholes!'?"

</p><p>Holzle was not able to point to any success stories. "Quite frankly, the site tends to attract assholes. And do you think we ever want to talk to these people again? We have to swab these assholes' goddamn assholes. What a pile of shit this job is. What the hell was I <i>thinking</i>? Apparently some have bred. This will probably doom the human gene pool. I'm so very, very sorry."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>KALLIKAK , Gattaca , Saturday    Genetic testing companies are promising to match couples based on Escherichia coli testing , touting the benefits of biological compatibility and claiming a match means better personality match , better sex and conclusive proof that they match right down to the asshole [ today.com ] .
" How many dating services can you think of where assholes can meet an asshole they really deserve ?
" said Eric Holzle , founder of AssholePersonalityDisorderMatch.com .
People tend to be attracted to those whose personalities are appropriately complementary to their own .
APDMatch claims to be able to ascertain this by scientifically measuring the characteristics of a prospective couple 's digestive tracts .
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ( DSM-IV-TR ) inexplicably fails to detail Asshole Personality Disorder .
However , a diagnosis of APD requires five or more of the following to be present for a significant period of time : Self-importance Refusal to acknowledge or even comprehend social rules Delusions of adequacy Believes others would do just fine if only they were sensible like him Beliefs appear to change to match the situation , but that 's just other people being idiotic Pride in their superior people skills Recto-cranial inversion Projection of all symptoms on this list onto those around them .
" If we can make sure that assholes end up with other assholes , " said Dr Holzle , " we can save the rest of us from dealing with their ridiculous bullshit .
" But do n't put too much faith in this , experts said .
Dr. Rocio Moran , medical director of the General Genetics Clinic at the Cleveland Clinic , called the idea " ridiculous , " and said the science of assholism is too complex to work out by looking at a few bacterial traces .
" They are just trying to make a buck , " she said .
" Focusing on getting those bucks from assholes is , of course , commendable .
But assholism is subtle and endemic .
How many times have you heard some asshole proclaim , 'hah , that really sticks it to those assholes ! ' ?
" Holzle was not able to point to any success stories .
" Quite frankly , the site tends to attract assholes .
And do you think we ever want to talk to these people again ?
We have to swab these assholes ' goddamn assholes .
What a pile of shit this job is .
What the hell was I thinking ?
Apparently some have bred .
This will probably doom the human gene pool .
I 'm so very , very sorry .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext> KALLIKAK, Gattaca, Saturday — Genetic testing companies are promising to match couples based on Escherichia coli testing, touting the benefits of biological compatibility and claiming a match means better personality match, better sex and conclusive proof that they match right down to the asshole [today.com].
"How many dating services can you think of where assholes can meet an asshole they really deserve?
" said Eric Holzle, founder of AssholePersonalityDisorderMatch.com.
People tend to be attracted to those whose personalities are appropriately complementary to their own.
APDMatch claims to be able to ascertain this by scientifically measuring the characteristics of a prospective couple's digestive tracts.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) inexplicably fails to detail Asshole Personality Disorder.
However, a diagnosis of APD requires five or more of the following to be present for a significant period of time: Self-importance
Refusal to acknowledge or even comprehend social rules
Delusions of adequacy
Believes others would do just fine if only they were sensible like him
Beliefs appear to change to match the situation, but that's just other people being idiotic
Pride in their superior people skills
Recto-cranial inversion
Projection of all symptoms on this list onto those around them.
"If we can make sure that assholes end up with other assholes," said Dr Holzle, "we can save the rest of us from dealing with their ridiculous bullshit.
"

But don't put too much faith in this, experts said.
Dr. Rocio Moran, medical director of the General Genetics Clinic at the Cleveland Clinic, called the idea "ridiculous," and said the science of assholism is too complex to work out by looking at a few bacterial traces.
"They are just trying to make a buck," she said.
"Focusing on getting those bucks from assholes is, of course, commendable.
But assholism is subtle and endemic.
How many times have you heard some asshole proclaim, 'hah, that really sticks it to those assholes!'?
"

Holzle was not able to point to any success stories.
"Quite frankly, the site tends to attract assholes.
And do you think we ever want to talk to these people again?
We have to swab these assholes' goddamn assholes.
What a pile of shit this job is.
What the hell was I thinking?
Apparently some have bred.
This will probably doom the human gene pool.
I'm so very, very sorry.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30112354</id>
	<title>Re:Untrue</title>
	<author>EspressoFreak</author>
	<datestamp>1258311060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They're lying.</p></div><p>It's tactful advertising.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're lying.It 's tactful advertising .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're lying.It's tactful advertising.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30114956</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm...</title>
	<author>Chapter80</author>
	<datestamp>1258385460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If the government wants to get into the match-making industry, more power to 'em!</p></div></blockquote><p>Yeah, I think "more power" is exactly what was intended <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensborn" title="wikipedia.org">the last time a government wanted to get into the match-making industry.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's\_law" title="wikipedia.org">OK, we can officially declare this discussion closed now.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the government wants to get into the match-making industry , more power to 'em ! Yeah , I think " more power " is exactly what was intended the last time a government wanted to get into the match-making industry .
[ wikipedia.org ] OK , we can officially declare this discussion closed now .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the government wants to get into the match-making industry, more power to 'em!Yeah, I think "more power" is exactly what was intended the last time a government wanted to get into the match-making industry.
[wikipedia.org]OK, we can officially declare this discussion closed now.
[wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30116078</id>
	<title>Re:Hey baby...</title>
	<author>TheLink</author>
	<datestamp>1258390380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; Nice genes...<br><br>They're just a pair of old hand-me-downs from dad and mom.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Nice genes...They 're just a pair of old hand-me-downs from dad and mom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Nice genes...They're just a pair of old hand-me-downs from dad and mom.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109710</id>
	<title>Don't know about you guys...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258285740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but I prefer to give my DNA during the date.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but I prefer to give my DNA during the date .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but I prefer to give my DNA during the date.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110404</id>
	<title>EPIC FAIL!</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1258290660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This just proves how low one can go in knowing jack about dating.<br>DNA tests? Yeah, because we want to stay 20+ years with a person, have sex and love each other, because of a great <strong>DNA match</strong>!<br>Toootally realistic!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>I think the best way to know if a dating site is good, is by finding out the <em>dating skills of those who created it</em>!</p><p>On second thought. Why slow yourself down by using a dating site? Just read a bit about how dating actually works (There is no shame in knowing the theory. It can only make things better.), then go out and <em>talk</em> to girls! Gives you much more than any site could.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This just proves how low one can go in knowing jack about dating.DNA tests ?
Yeah , because we want to stay 20 + years with a person , have sex and love each other , because of a great DNA match ! Toootally realistic !
; ) I think the best way to know if a dating site is good , is by finding out the dating skills of those who created it ! On second thought .
Why slow yourself down by using a dating site ?
Just read a bit about how dating actually works ( There is no shame in knowing the theory .
It can only make things better .
) , then go out and talk to girls !
Gives you much more than any site could .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This just proves how low one can go in knowing jack about dating.DNA tests?
Yeah, because we want to stay 20+ years with a person, have sex and love each other, because of a great DNA match!Toootally realistic!
;)I think the best way to know if a dating site is good, is by finding out the dating skills of those who created it!On second thought.
Why slow yourself down by using a dating site?
Just read a bit about how dating actually works (There is no shame in knowing the theory.
It can only make things better.
), then go out and talk to girls!
Gives you much more than any site could.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107970</id>
	<title>Untrue</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258317480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>'The companies claim that a better biological match will mean better sex, less cheating, longer-lasting love and perhaps even healthier children.'</i></p><p>They're lying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'The companies claim that a better biological match will mean better sex , less cheating , longer-lasting love and perhaps even healthier children .
'They 're lying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'The companies claim that a better biological match will mean better sex, less cheating, longer-lasting love and perhaps even healthier children.
'They're lying.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108680</id>
	<title>Re:So they Suck your Dick first???? PERFECT!</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1258278240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now *that's* marketing!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now * that 's * marketing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now *that's* marketing!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108044</id>
	<title>Gattaca?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258317780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gattaca?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gattaca ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gattaca?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109186</id>
	<title>Re:The company name is kind of disturbing</title>
	<author>Crudely\_Indecent</author>
	<datestamp>1258281900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The company name is actually <a href="http://whois.domaintools.com/scientificmatch.com" title="domaintools.com">Love Sciences, LLC</a> [domaintools.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The company name is actually Love Sciences , LLC [ domaintools.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The company name is actually Love Sciences, LLC [domaintools.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107834</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107896</id>
	<title>Offspring</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258317180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like a way to 'improve' the genetic makeup of the children. The nazis would have loved the idea<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like a way to 'improve ' the genetic makeup of the children .
The nazis would have loved the idea  </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like a way to 'improve' the genetic makeup of the children.
The nazis would have loved the idea
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111684</id>
	<title>Re:The company name is kind of disturbing</title>
	<author>Foobar of Borg</author>
	<datestamp>1258302840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"Incest Is Best Inc"</p></div>

</blockquote><p>Well, at least it's better than the company that uses exact matches, called "Go Fuck Yourself, Inc."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Incest Is Best Inc " Well , at least it 's better than the company that uses exact matches , called " Go Fuck Yourself , Inc. "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Incest Is Best Inc"

Well, at least it's better than the company that uses exact matches, called "Go Fuck Yourself, Inc."
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107834</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109118</id>
	<title>Mimicking nature</title>
	<author>RawsonDR</author>
	<datestamp>1258281360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It has worked out so far for evolution, hasn't it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>It has worked out so far for evolution , has n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has worked out so far for evolution, hasn't it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108672</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30119098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30113116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30114956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30116222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30116478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30130654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30116078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30119350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30112354
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30118932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30114632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_15_1734238_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108640
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108390
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109004
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108490
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30113066
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109124
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30116078
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109024
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107948
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110718
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111502
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109576
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110730
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109118
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110384
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30113116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30116222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108466
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30116478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30112354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108634
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111562
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109158
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30119154
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109116
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108690
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111472
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108588
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109172
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108882
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30110220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30114632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109810
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30114956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30130654
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108150
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30118932
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108680
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30119098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108478
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108666
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30107834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30119350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109264
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30108954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30109608
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_15_1734238.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_15_1734238.30111428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
