<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_13_019202</id>
	<title>Synthetic Stone DVD Claimed To Last 1,000 Years</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1258122780000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Lucas123 writes <i>"A start-up launched a new DVD archive product this week: a disc that it says will hold its data for 1,000 years. The company, Cranberry, says its DiamonDisc product, which can be used in any standard DVD player, is <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140771/Start\_up\_claims\_its\_DVDs\_last\_1\_000\_years">not subject to deterioration from heat, UV rays or material rot</a> due to humidity or other elements because it has no dyes, adhesives or reflective materials like standard DVD discs, and its discs are made from a vastly more durable synthetic stone. Data is laid down on the platter much in the same way as a standard DVD disc, but with DiamonDisc the burner etches much deeper pits. Cranberry said it is also working on producing a Blu-ray version of its 1,000-year disc."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lucas123 writes " A start-up launched a new DVD archive product this week : a disc that it says will hold its data for 1,000 years .
The company , Cranberry , says its DiamonDisc product , which can be used in any standard DVD player , is not subject to deterioration from heat , UV rays or material rot due to humidity or other elements because it has no dyes , adhesives or reflective materials like standard DVD discs , and its discs are made from a vastly more durable synthetic stone .
Data is laid down on the platter much in the same way as a standard DVD disc , but with DiamonDisc the burner etches much deeper pits .
Cranberry said it is also working on producing a Blu-ray version of its 1,000-year disc .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lucas123 writes "A start-up launched a new DVD archive product this week: a disc that it says will hold its data for 1,000 years.
The company, Cranberry, says its DiamonDisc product, which can be used in any standard DVD player, is not subject to deterioration from heat, UV rays or material rot due to humidity or other elements because it has no dyes, adhesives or reflective materials like standard DVD discs, and its discs are made from a vastly more durable synthetic stone.
Data is laid down on the platter much in the same way as a standard DVD disc, but with DiamonDisc the burner etches much deeper pits.
Cranberry said it is also working on producing a Blu-ray version of its 1,000-year disc.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083634</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Brian Gordon</author>
	<datestamp>1258049040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From Pokemon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From Pokemon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From Pokemon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083414</id>
	<title>Re:Finally, a convenient alternative to pyramids..</title>
	<author>umbrellasd</author>
	<datestamp>1258045860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We've just entered the Neoneolithic Age.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 've just entered the Neoneolithic Age .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We've just entered the Neoneolithic Age.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083372</id>
	<title>Re:Curious...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258045380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Errr, a parked car in summer will roughly reach 120F. And you're complaining that 176F isn't good enough?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Errr , a parked car in summer will roughly reach 120F .
And you 're complaining that 176F is n't good enough ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Errr, a parked car in summer will roughly reach 120F.
And you're complaining that 176F isn't good enough?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30088352</id>
	<title>Re:is this a joke ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258135500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>DVD that can store data for 1000 years. Who cares even if it does ?</p></div><p>1)  The RIAA<br>2)  The MPAA</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>DVD that can store data for 1000 years .
Who cares even if it does ? 1 ) The RIAA2 ) The MPAA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DVD that can store data for 1000 years.
Who cares even if it does ?1)  The RIAA2)  The MPAA
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085470</id>
	<title>Only one thing to say...</title>
	<author>Cytlid</author>
	<datestamp>1258119120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yabba dabba dooo!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yabba dabba dooo !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yabba dabba dooo!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083386</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>isny</author>
	<datestamp>1258045560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Paper covers rock.  Rock beats scissors.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Paper covers rock .
Rock beats scissors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Paper covers rock.
Rock beats scissors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085410</id>
	<title>After 5000 years...</title>
	<author>someone1234</author>
	<datestamp>1258118640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We go back to stone tablets. Wow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We go back to stone tablets .
Wow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We go back to stone tablets.
Wow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083484</id>
	<title>Re:Curious...</title>
	<author>Zalbik</author>
	<datestamp>1258046520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>TFA quotes temperature resistance of 176 degrees....It's barely warmer than parked-car-in-summer-sun.</p></div></blockquote><p>Where the hell are you parking your car?  Mt. Vesuvius?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA quotes temperature resistance of 176 degrees....It 's barely warmer than parked-car-in-summer-sun.Where the hell are you parking your car ?
Mt. Vesuvius ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA quotes temperature resistance of 176 degrees....It's barely warmer than parked-car-in-summer-sun.Where the hell are you parking your car?
Mt. Vesuvius?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083202</id>
	<title>Re:Finally, a convenient alternative to pyramids..</title>
	<author>Angst Badger</author>
	<datestamp>1258043880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As it stands, you might want to get a solid five-year warranty on existing recordable DVDs, because the odds are you'll be disappointed as little as two years down the road. I have 5.25" floppy disks from the 8-bit Apple II era that have a higher data retention rate than a lot of DVD-R discs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As it stands , you might want to get a solid five-year warranty on existing recordable DVDs , because the odds are you 'll be disappointed as little as two years down the road .
I have 5.25 " floppy disks from the 8-bit Apple II era that have a higher data retention rate than a lot of DVD-R discs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As it stands, you might want to get a solid five-year warranty on existing recordable DVDs, because the odds are you'll be disappointed as little as two years down the road.
I have 5.25" floppy disks from the 8-bit Apple II era that have a higher data retention rate than a lot of DVD-R discs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30088356</id>
	<title>Re:$30...</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1258135500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>$30 Dollars for one 4.7 gig disk</p></div><p>If not dual layer, couldn't it at least be double-sided?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>$ 30 Dollars for one 4.7 gig diskIf not dual layer , could n't it at least be double-sided ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>$30 Dollars for one 4.7 gig diskIf not dual layer, couldn't it at least be double-sided?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083836</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082906</id>
	<title>This new archival format from Cranberry...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258041540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... seems to have been designed to linger.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... seems to have been designed to linger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... seems to have been designed to linger.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083012</id>
	<title>Re:1000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258042440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will you? really?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will you ?
really ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will you?
really?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085208</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>gsslay</author>
	<datestamp>1258115760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I have yet to find one that lasts longer than 5.</p></div><p>Wow, you can't be looking too hard.  Or maybe you are exceptionally rough on your CDs.  You do know you're not really suppose to use them as coasters or to scrape ice off your windscreen?</p><p>I have CDs that play just fine after 25 years.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have yet to find one that lasts longer than 5.Wow , you ca n't be looking too hard .
Or maybe you are exceptionally rough on your CDs .
You do know you 're not really suppose to use them as coasters or to scrape ice off your windscreen ? I have CDs that play just fine after 25 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have yet to find one that lasts longer than 5.Wow, you can't be looking too hard.
Or maybe you are exceptionally rough on your CDs.
You do know you're not really suppose to use them as coasters or to scrape ice off your windscreen?I have CDs that play just fine after 25 years.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083166</id>
	<title>Re:This new archival format from Cranberry...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258043460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I get it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I get it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I get it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083178</id>
	<title>Re:Finally, a convenient alternative to pyramids..</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1258043640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd be interested to see, actually, how "practical" hieroglyphs in stone could be made to be, if somebody did a completely straight-faced interpretation of the idea, using fully modern techniques.<br> <br>

With all the research that has been done for barcodes, and the resulting wealth of fairly high density, surprisingly robust, and monochrome printable data encoding systems, plus modern CNC gear and a dash of robotics, you should be able to produce a device that would swiftly, automatically, and (comparatively) efficiently write data to stone tablets, and interface with ordinary computer systems as a WORM drive...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be interested to see , actually , how " practical " hieroglyphs in stone could be made to be , if somebody did a completely straight-faced interpretation of the idea , using fully modern techniques .
With all the research that has been done for barcodes , and the resulting wealth of fairly high density , surprisingly robust , and monochrome printable data encoding systems , plus modern CNC gear and a dash of robotics , you should be able to produce a device that would swiftly , automatically , and ( comparatively ) efficiently write data to stone tablets , and interface with ordinary computer systems as a WORM drive.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd be interested to see, actually, how "practical" hieroglyphs in stone could be made to be, if somebody did a completely straight-faced interpretation of the idea, using fully modern techniques.
With all the research that has been done for barcodes, and the resulting wealth of fairly high density, surprisingly robust, and monochrome printable data encoding systems, plus modern CNC gear and a dash of robotics, you should be able to produce a device that would swiftly, automatically, and (comparatively) efficiently write data to stone tablets, and interface with ordinary computer systems as a WORM drive...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083590</id>
	<title>Lesson of Alexandria...</title>
	<author>Anachragnome</author>
	<datestamp>1258048080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...but the media is unharmed by heat as high as 176 degrees Fahrenheit, ultraviolet rays or normal material deterioration..."</p><p>In short, it still cannot survive a simple house fire or the complete leveling of a major city by fire, historically the single greatest threat to information storage.</p><p>I am curious what it does in a microwave oven though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...but the media is unharmed by heat as high as 176 degrees Fahrenheit , ultraviolet rays or normal material deterioration... " In short , it still can not survive a simple house fire or the complete leveling of a major city by fire , historically the single greatest threat to information storage.I am curious what it does in a microwave oven though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...but the media is unharmed by heat as high as 176 degrees Fahrenheit, ultraviolet rays or normal material deterioration..."In short, it still cannot survive a simple house fire or the complete leveling of a major city by fire, historically the single greatest threat to information storage.I am curious what it does in a microwave oven though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083444</id>
	<title>Greatest slogan EVER!</title>
	<author>FatdogHaiku</author>
	<datestamp>1258046160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How did their marketing department miss this?<br> <br> <b>"DiamonDisc archive solutions... it's the pits!"</b> <br> <br>Sometimes this stuff just writes itself... where do I send my resume?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How did their marketing department miss this ?
" DiamonDisc archive solutions... it 's the pits !
" Sometimes this stuff just writes itself... where do I send my resume ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How did their marketing department miss this?
"DiamonDisc archive solutions... it's the pits!
"  Sometimes this stuff just writes itself... where do I send my resume?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</id>
	<title>1,000 years?</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1258040160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, when CDs and DVDs came out, they claimed they would last 50 years. I have yet to find one that lasts longer than 5. So I'd say, 1,000 years translates to about a hundred years, tops. Also, it may not be vulnerable to humidity in a controlled environment, but in the outdoors, a few seasons of freezing/melting and it'll be shot. Water beats rock every time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , when CDs and DVDs came out , they claimed they would last 50 years .
I have yet to find one that lasts longer than 5 .
So I 'd say , 1,000 years translates to about a hundred years , tops .
Also , it may not be vulnerable to humidity in a controlled environment , but in the outdoors , a few seasons of freezing/melting and it 'll be shot .
Water beats rock every time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, when CDs and DVDs came out, they claimed they would last 50 years.
I have yet to find one that lasts longer than 5.
So I'd say, 1,000 years translates to about a hundred years, tops.
Also, it may not be vulnerable to humidity in a controlled environment, but in the outdoors, a few seasons of freezing/melting and it'll be shot.
Water beats rock every time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083680</id>
	<title>NOW WE'RE TALKING!</title>
	<author>mateomiguel</author>
	<datestamp>1258049820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is my kinda computing.  Etch that data in stone!  Nwo they could just make me a computer made entire of stone and steel, with arcane markings etched into all sides, I can start doing my computing with a true view for the long term!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is my kinda computing .
Etch that data in stone !
Nwo they could just make me a computer made entire of stone and steel , with arcane markings etched into all sides , I can start doing my computing with a true view for the long term !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is my kinda computing.
Etch that data in stone!
Nwo they could just make me a computer made entire of stone and steel, with arcane markings etched into all sides, I can start doing my computing with a true view for the long term!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085432</id>
	<title>Unfortunately, it will go nowhere</title>
	<author>petrus4</author>
	<datestamp>1258118760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As the x86 architecture has already eloquently proven to us, (and Windows to a degree as well, given that the customer <b>perception</b> was that Windows was free, due to the CPU tax) competitive fitness in the marketplace is determined purely by price.</p><p>Technological/engineering quality does not enter into the equation at all; if it did, we'd all be using MIPS or ARM processors, and the x86 would be dead.</p><p>From the market point of view, it doesn't matter in the slightest that these disks might be more reliable, or last much longer than conventional DVDs.  The cheapest solution always wins, and usually, the cheapest solution is also the worst technological solution, not the best.</p><p>I would love to own one of these burners, and also several of these DVDs, because I'm one of the few very rare individuals who values technical excellence more than superficiality.  However, the economic problem is still a very practical one for me, sadly; I'm on a pension.</p><p>Hence, I might really want stone DVDs, but if I can only afford conventional ones, conventional are what I will buy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As the x86 architecture has already eloquently proven to us , ( and Windows to a degree as well , given that the customer perception was that Windows was free , due to the CPU tax ) competitive fitness in the marketplace is determined purely by price.Technological/engineering quality does not enter into the equation at all ; if it did , we 'd all be using MIPS or ARM processors , and the x86 would be dead.From the market point of view , it does n't matter in the slightest that these disks might be more reliable , or last much longer than conventional DVDs .
The cheapest solution always wins , and usually , the cheapest solution is also the worst technological solution , not the best.I would love to own one of these burners , and also several of these DVDs , because I 'm one of the few very rare individuals who values technical excellence more than superficiality .
However , the economic problem is still a very practical one for me , sadly ; I 'm on a pension.Hence , I might really want stone DVDs , but if I can only afford conventional ones , conventional are what I will buy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As the x86 architecture has already eloquently proven to us, (and Windows to a degree as well, given that the customer perception was that Windows was free, due to the CPU tax) competitive fitness in the marketplace is determined purely by price.Technological/engineering quality does not enter into the equation at all; if it did, we'd all be using MIPS or ARM processors, and the x86 would be dead.From the market point of view, it doesn't matter in the slightest that these disks might be more reliable, or last much longer than conventional DVDs.
The cheapest solution always wins, and usually, the cheapest solution is also the worst technological solution, not the best.I would love to own one of these burners, and also several of these DVDs, because I'm one of the few very rare individuals who values technical excellence more than superficiality.
However, the economic problem is still a very practical one for me, sadly; I'm on a pension.Hence, I might really want stone DVDs, but if I can only afford conventional ones, conventional are what I will buy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083044</id>
	<title>Curious...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258042620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>TFA quotes temperature resistance of 176 degrees. Fahrenheit. For a "synthetic stone" product that is supposed to be super durable, that is chickenshit. It's barely warmer than parked-car-in-summer-sun.<br> <br>

I have to wonder, did some journalist fail at accuracy, or are these things actually pretty painfully unexciting in terms of temperature resistance?</htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA quotes temperature resistance of 176 degrees .
Fahrenheit. For a " synthetic stone " product that is supposed to be super durable , that is chickenshit .
It 's barely warmer than parked-car-in-summer-sun .
I have to wonder , did some journalist fail at accuracy , or are these things actually pretty painfully unexciting in terms of temperature resistance ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA quotes temperature resistance of 176 degrees.
Fahrenheit. For a "synthetic stone" product that is supposed to be super durable, that is chickenshit.
It's barely warmer than parked-car-in-summer-sun.
I have to wonder, did some journalist fail at accuracy, or are these things actually pretty painfully unexciting in terms of temperature resistance?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083370</id>
	<title>1000 years later.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258045380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like "Conan The Librarian" when after the Mayan apocalypse of 2012, 1000 years later when the vestiges of humanity finally rediscover metalworking, Conan goes on a mission to find the mythical Stone DVD which a shamanic priest who has access to a pre-apocalypse technology, inserts it into the player only to find porn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like " Conan The Librarian " when after the Mayan apocalypse of 2012 , 1000 years later when the vestiges of humanity finally rediscover metalworking , Conan goes on a mission to find the mythical Stone DVD which a shamanic priest who has access to a pre-apocalypse technology , inserts it into the player only to find porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like "Conan The Librarian" when after the Mayan apocalypse of 2012, 1000 years later when the vestiges of humanity finally rediscover metalworking, Conan goes on a mission to find the mythical Stone DVD which a shamanic priest who has access to a pre-apocalypse technology, inserts it into the player only to find porn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083836</id>
	<title>$30...</title>
	<author>stms</author>
	<datestamp>1258051560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>$30 Dollars for one 4.7 gig disk no thank you I'll stick with hard drive back up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>$ 30 Dollars for one 4.7 gig disk no thank you I 'll stick with hard drive back up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>$30 Dollars for one 4.7 gig disk no thank you I'll stick with hard drive back up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084252</id>
	<title>Re:Finally, a convenient alternative to pyramids..</title>
	<author>rrohbeck</author>
	<datestamp>1258143540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're just round clay tablets. 3,000 year old tech, but obviously very durable,</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're just round clay tablets .
3,000 year old tech , but obviously very durable,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're just round clay tablets.
3,000 year old tech, but obviously very durable,</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30089912</id>
	<title>Re:they can sell it in Germany as</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258141560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Explanation for non-Germans please?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Explanation for non-Germans please ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Explanation for non-Germans please?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083884</id>
	<title>Yabba dabba do</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258052100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone call the flintstones were going back to the stone age.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone call the flintstones were going back to the stone age .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone call the flintstones were going back to the stone age.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083514</id>
	<title>they can sell it in Germany as</title>
	<author>bitt3n</author>
	<datestamp>1258047240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Thousand Year Rock</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Thousand Year Rock</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Thousand Year Rock</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085586</id>
	<title>Re:1000 years later.....</title>
	<author>petrus4</author>
	<datestamp>1258120440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As long as said porn features either Gianna Michaels, Faith Nelson, or Linsey Dawn McKenzie, that's fine.</p><p>I would have advocated porn featuring any of those two women, for inclusion on the Voyager Golden Record, quite seriously.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as said porn features either Gianna Michaels , Faith Nelson , or Linsey Dawn McKenzie , that 's fine.I would have advocated porn featuring any of those two women , for inclusion on the Voyager Golden Record , quite seriously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as said porn features either Gianna Michaels, Faith Nelson, or Linsey Dawn McKenzie, that's fine.I would have advocated porn featuring any of those two women, for inclusion on the Voyager Golden Record, quite seriously.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082940</id>
	<title>Stone DVDs?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258041720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They'll come in several varieties: </p><ul> <li>Mafic</li><li>Felsic</li><li>Pornographic</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll come in several varieties : MaficFelsicPornographic</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll come in several varieties:  MaficFelsicPornographic</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082864</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258041180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I have yet to find one that lasts longer than 5."<br>Generally true (esp.TDK) - but all of my Memorex "white label" discs work perfectly, some 10-12 years later.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I have yet to find one that lasts longer than 5 .
" Generally true ( esp.TDK ) - but all of my Memorex " white label " discs work perfectly , some 10-12 years later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I have yet to find one that lasts longer than 5.
"Generally true (esp.TDK) - but all of my Memorex "white label" discs work perfectly, some 10-12 years later.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083092</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>bcwright</author>
	<datestamp>1258042980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Also, it may not be vulnerable to humidity in a controlled environment, but in the outdoors, a few seasons of freezing/melting and it'll be shot. Water beats rock every time.</p></div><p>I really don't care if my archival storage can stand being left outside for several years, because I don't intend to do that.  I'd be quite happy if it were at least as durable as a book, which if well made and with reasonable care can last at least a couple hundred years, possibly over 1000 under ideal conditions.  So what if it can get ruined if it's left in the rain?  If I care enough about the data, I just make a few copies and put them in different places and hopefully if I've chosen well at least one will survive.  Right now it's not at all clear that typical CD's and DVD's are even as durable as cheap pulp paperbacks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , it may not be vulnerable to humidity in a controlled environment , but in the outdoors , a few seasons of freezing/melting and it 'll be shot .
Water beats rock every time.I really do n't care if my archival storage can stand being left outside for several years , because I do n't intend to do that .
I 'd be quite happy if it were at least as durable as a book , which if well made and with reasonable care can last at least a couple hundred years , possibly over 1000 under ideal conditions .
So what if it can get ruined if it 's left in the rain ?
If I care enough about the data , I just make a few copies and put them in different places and hopefully if I 've chosen well at least one will survive .
Right now it 's not at all clear that typical CD 's and DVD 's are even as durable as cheap pulp paperbacks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, it may not be vulnerable to humidity in a controlled environment, but in the outdoors, a few seasons of freezing/melting and it'll be shot.
Water beats rock every time.I really don't care if my archival storage can stand being left outside for several years, because I don't intend to do that.
I'd be quite happy if it were at least as durable as a book, which if well made and with reasonable care can last at least a couple hundred years, possibly over 1000 under ideal conditions.
So what if it can get ruined if it's left in the rain?
If I care enough about the data, I just make a few copies and put them in different places and hopefully if I've chosen well at least one will survive.
Right now it's not at all clear that typical CD's and DVD's are even as durable as cheap pulp paperbacks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082762</id>
	<title>Finally, a convenient alternative to pyramids...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258040400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Jeeez, it took long enough to come up with a practical alternative to hieroglyphics carved in stone.  So far, that was the best technology for millennial storage.  I just want to be certain that I get that 1000 year warranty, in case its just a bunch of empty promises.  I don't want to be disappointed 800 years down the road.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jeeez , it took long enough to come up with a practical alternative to hieroglyphics carved in stone .
So far , that was the best technology for millennial storage .
I just want to be certain that I get that 1000 year warranty , in case its just a bunch of empty promises .
I do n't want to be disappointed 800 years down the road .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jeeez, it took long enough to come up with a practical alternative to hieroglyphics carved in stone.
So far, that was the best technology for millennial storage.
I just want to be certain that I get that 1000 year warranty, in case its just a bunch of empty promises.
I don't want to be disappointed 800 years down the road.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083150</id>
	<title>ComputerWorld astroturfing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258043280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>WTF is up with all the ComputerWorld pigpiling on Slashdot lately? Usually it's "CWMike" but today Lucas123 AKA Lucas Mearian is doing his own self-promotion.</htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF is up with all the ComputerWorld pigpiling on Slashdot lately ?
Usually it 's " CWMike " but today Lucas123 AKA Lucas Mearian is doing his own self-promotion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF is up with all the ComputerWorld pigpiling on Slashdot lately?
Usually it's "CWMike" but today Lucas123 AKA Lucas Mearian is doing his own self-promotion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084862</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Monolith1</author>
	<datestamp>1258110240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Water beats rock every time.</p></div><p>Actually, I think you will find paper beats rock everytime...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Water beats rock every time.Actually , I think you will find paper beats rock everytime.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Water beats rock every time.Actually, I think you will find paper beats rock everytime...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083004</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258042380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>All of the stamped CDs that I have that are 20+ years old still play perfectly fine (and rip with minimal or no errors, too). And of the burned discs that I have (going back to 1996), only 3 or 4 have had unreadable portions. I was still able to retrieve most of the data from those successfully, too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All of the stamped CDs that I have that are 20 + years old still play perfectly fine ( and rip with minimal or no errors , too ) .
And of the burned discs that I have ( going back to 1996 ) , only 3 or 4 have had unreadable portions .
I was still able to retrieve most of the data from those successfully , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of the stamped CDs that I have that are 20+ years old still play perfectly fine (and rip with minimal or no errors, too).
And of the burned discs that I have (going back to 1996), only 3 or 4 have had unreadable portions.
I was still able to retrieve most of the data from those successfully, too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084816</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258109520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed, this is why you laminate it after you are done burning.</p><p>Ah the wonders of lamination.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed , this is why you laminate it after you are done burning.Ah the wonders of lamination .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed, this is why you laminate it after you are done burning.Ah the wonders of lamination.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30087984</id>
	<title>Re:Errr...</title>
	<author>cdrguru</author>
	<datestamp>1258133640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Manufactured discs are read by a detecting a phase change in the reflection.  This is done with a manufactured disc by casting the polycarbonate at different depths from the outer surface of the disc and the distance between a "pit" and a "land" can be detected easily with the optics.</p><p>Recordable discs today work by decreasing the amount of light being reflected from a fixed reflector.  I suspect these discs work a lot more like a manufactured disc than recordable discs work today, but I haven't really read up on the physics of it.  I understand the laser used is way, way more powerful than what is used to change the dye in current write-once recordable discs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Manufactured discs are read by a detecting a phase change in the reflection .
This is done with a manufactured disc by casting the polycarbonate at different depths from the outer surface of the disc and the distance between a " pit " and a " land " can be detected easily with the optics.Recordable discs today work by decreasing the amount of light being reflected from a fixed reflector .
I suspect these discs work a lot more like a manufactured disc than recordable discs work today , but I have n't really read up on the physics of it .
I understand the laser used is way , way more powerful than what is used to change the dye in current write-once recordable discs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Manufactured discs are read by a detecting a phase change in the reflection.
This is done with a manufactured disc by casting the polycarbonate at different depths from the outer surface of the disc and the distance between a "pit" and a "land" can be detected easily with the optics.Recordable discs today work by decreasing the amount of light being reflected from a fixed reflector.
I suspect these discs work a lot more like a manufactured disc than recordable discs work today, but I haven't really read up on the physics of it.
I understand the laser used is way, way more powerful than what is used to change the dye in current write-once recordable discs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083420</id>
	<title>flash memory?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258045860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>why not just store information on a flash memory chip?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>why not just store information on a flash memory chip ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why not just store information on a flash memory chip?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085350</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258117800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then you're doing something wrong.  I have nearly 10,000 music CDs (dating from the mid-80s), hundreds of burned data CD-Rs (dating from the mid-90s), hundreds of DVDs, and a thousand-or-so burned DVD-Rs (from around 2000 onwards), and they've been transported around the country a few times, kept in less than ideal storage conditions, and guess what?  They're fine.  A couple of music CDs got some sort of bloom on them that was easily wiped off.  Other than that, no issues.  I'd love to know what the hell you're doing with your discs!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then you 're doing something wrong .
I have nearly 10,000 music CDs ( dating from the mid-80s ) , hundreds of burned data CD-Rs ( dating from the mid-90s ) , hundreds of DVDs , and a thousand-or-so burned DVD-Rs ( from around 2000 onwards ) , and they 've been transported around the country a few times , kept in less than ideal storage conditions , and guess what ?
They 're fine .
A couple of music CDs got some sort of bloom on them that was easily wiped off .
Other than that , no issues .
I 'd love to know what the hell you 're doing with your discs !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then you're doing something wrong.
I have nearly 10,000 music CDs (dating from the mid-80s), hundreds of burned data CD-Rs (dating from the mid-90s), hundreds of DVDs, and a thousand-or-so burned DVD-Rs (from around 2000 onwards), and they've been transported around the country a few times, kept in less than ideal storage conditions, and guess what?
They're fine.
A couple of music CDs got some sort of bloom on them that was easily wiped off.
Other than that, no issues.
I'd love to know what the hell you're doing with your discs!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084038</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>TheModelEskimo</author>
	<datestamp>1258053900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your step-father? The Cars? Mid-to-late 80s? Your grammar is just good enough that I almost divided by zero when I was reading that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your step-father ?
The Cars ?
Mid-to-late 80s ?
Your grammar is just good enough that I almost divided by zero when I was reading that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your step-father?
The Cars?
Mid-to-late 80s?
Your grammar is just good enough that I almost divided by zero when I was reading that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085700</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>jridley</author>
	<datestamp>1258121640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have CD-Rs that were recorded around 1994 (the recorder was the size of a standard size PC case, cost $3500 and recorded at 2X - and with hard drive speeds at the time and no buffer underrun protection, you couldn't even touch the mouse or you'd burn a coaster) that are fine.  I have a spindle of 50 of them, and I pull them out every few years and run a sampling through Nero CD Speed which detects even low-level errors that would normally be corrected.</p><p>These are all still fine, with only one or two correctable errors per CD, about the same as a freshly-burned CD.</p><p>The problem, I suspect, is that you're using cheap discs.  These were recorded on Kodak gold datalife discs, they cost about $5 each at the time.  Also, they're in a spindle in a dry basement with very constant temperature and low light.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have CD-Rs that were recorded around 1994 ( the recorder was the size of a standard size PC case , cost $ 3500 and recorded at 2X - and with hard drive speeds at the time and no buffer underrun protection , you could n't even touch the mouse or you 'd burn a coaster ) that are fine .
I have a spindle of 50 of them , and I pull them out every few years and run a sampling through Nero CD Speed which detects even low-level errors that would normally be corrected.These are all still fine , with only one or two correctable errors per CD , about the same as a freshly-burned CD.The problem , I suspect , is that you 're using cheap discs .
These were recorded on Kodak gold datalife discs , they cost about $ 5 each at the time .
Also , they 're in a spindle in a dry basement with very constant temperature and low light .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have CD-Rs that were recorded around 1994 (the recorder was the size of a standard size PC case, cost $3500 and recorded at 2X - and with hard drive speeds at the time and no buffer underrun protection, you couldn't even touch the mouse or you'd burn a coaster) that are fine.
I have a spindle of 50 of them, and I pull them out every few years and run a sampling through Nero CD Speed which detects even low-level errors that would normally be corrected.These are all still fine, with only one or two correctable errors per CD, about the same as a freshly-burned CD.The problem, I suspect, is that you're using cheap discs.
These were recorded on Kodak gold datalife discs, they cost about $5 each at the time.
Also, they're in a spindle in a dry basement with very constant temperature and low light.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083630</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>apoc.famine</author>
	<datestamp>1258048860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, I think water beats them all, given enough time. <br>
&nbsp; <br>The next time somebody challenges me to rock, paper, scissors, screw Spock and lizard. I'm going with water!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I think water beats them all , given enough time .
  The next time somebody challenges me to rock , paper , scissors , screw Spock and lizard .
I 'm going with water !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I think water beats them all, given enough time.
  The next time somebody challenges me to rock, paper, scissors, screw Spock and lizard.
I'm going with water!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085746</id>
	<title>Porn ...</title>
	<author>tgd</author>
	<datestamp>1258121880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's fantastic, now we can export 80's bush to the 31st century!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's fantastic , now we can export 80 's bush to the 31st century !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's fantastic, now we can export 80's bush to the 31st century!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083610</id>
	<title>Wait, what?</title>
	<author>millennial</author>
	<datestamp>1258048440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Made with no reflective materials? Then how on earth do you read it? Let's check the article:<blockquote><div><p>However, instead of a silver or gold reflective surface, its disc is transparent, with no reflective layer.</p></div> </blockquote><p>No. Sorry. No way. This is vaporware. It could not possibly work in a standard DVD player.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Made with no reflective materials ?
Then how on earth do you read it ?
Let 's check the article : However , instead of a silver or gold reflective surface , its disc is transparent , with no reflective layer .
No. Sorry .
No way .
This is vaporware .
It could not possibly work in a standard DVD player .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Made with no reflective materials?
Then how on earth do you read it?
Let's check the article:However, instead of a silver or gold reflective surface, its disc is transparent, with no reflective layer.
No. Sorry.
No way.
This is vaporware.
It could not possibly work in a standard DVD player.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084940</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>agentgonzo</author>
	<datestamp>1258111500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No, paper beats rock. There's no water in the game.</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iapcKVn7DdY" title="youtube.com">Spock</a> [youtube.com] also beats rock.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , paper beats rock .
There 's no water in the game .
Spock [ youtube.com ] also beats rock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, paper beats rock.
There's no water in the game.
Spock [youtube.com] also beats rock.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083088</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258042980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Water beats rock every time.</p></div><p>So you're saying we should be making our CDs out of water?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Water beats rock every time.So you 're saying we should be making our CDs out of water ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Water beats rock every time.So you're saying we should be making our CDs out of water?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30092902</id>
	<title>I have 1000 year DVD+R's for regular burners!</title>
	<author>misnohmer</author>
	<datestamp>1258113120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I will sell you 1000 year guaranteed DVD+R's for only $3 each per AND you can burn them on your regular burner! The warranty is 1000 years and comes with a full refund guarantee of the cost of the DVD ($3) for each one which fails.</p><p>Want to know my secret business model? I buy regular DVD's for $0.20, sell them for $3. Any DVD which fails I return the cost so my profit is only interest on the $3 for however many years (say average 5years, $0.60 profit which covers my cost 3X). I also make the entire $3 for any DVD's destroyed (shredded confidential data, etc), lost, etc.</p><p>Longevity claims by the manufacturer or seller are irrelevant, unless backed by some $ numbers. I bet Synthetic Stone's EULA states the warranty liability is the cost of the disk at most. Now, if there was insurance I could buy on this, the cost of this insurance would tell me the real reliability. If they are confident it's a 1 in a million chance for the disk to fail in 100 years, they should be able to sell me 100 year insurance for $1 which will pay $500,000 if that happens AND this would still net them $0.50 per disk profit (1M disks sold, $1M revenue, 1 $500K payout, $500K profit on 1M disks). If the odds differ for expected failure of 1, 10, 100, 1000 years, they should price the "insurance policies" accordingly. Then I'd believe it (and no, the "insurance company" cannot be a separate LLC which goes bankrupt every time there is a payout, it must tie to the original company or better yet be backed by a major insurance company).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I will sell you 1000 year guaranteed DVD + R 's for only $ 3 each per AND you can burn them on your regular burner !
The warranty is 1000 years and comes with a full refund guarantee of the cost of the DVD ( $ 3 ) for each one which fails.Want to know my secret business model ?
I buy regular DVD 's for $ 0.20 , sell them for $ 3 .
Any DVD which fails I return the cost so my profit is only interest on the $ 3 for however many years ( say average 5years , $ 0.60 profit which covers my cost 3X ) .
I also make the entire $ 3 for any DVD 's destroyed ( shredded confidential data , etc ) , lost , etc.Longevity claims by the manufacturer or seller are irrelevant , unless backed by some $ numbers .
I bet Synthetic Stone 's EULA states the warranty liability is the cost of the disk at most .
Now , if there was insurance I could buy on this , the cost of this insurance would tell me the real reliability .
If they are confident it 's a 1 in a million chance for the disk to fail in 100 years , they should be able to sell me 100 year insurance for $ 1 which will pay $ 500,000 if that happens AND this would still net them $ 0.50 per disk profit ( 1M disks sold , $ 1M revenue , 1 $ 500K payout , $ 500K profit on 1M disks ) .
If the odds differ for expected failure of 1 , 10 , 100 , 1000 years , they should price the " insurance policies " accordingly .
Then I 'd believe it ( and no , the " insurance company " can not be a separate LLC which goes bankrupt every time there is a payout , it must tie to the original company or better yet be backed by a major insurance company ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I will sell you 1000 year guaranteed DVD+R's for only $3 each per AND you can burn them on your regular burner!
The warranty is 1000 years and comes with a full refund guarantee of the cost of the DVD ($3) for each one which fails.Want to know my secret business model?
I buy regular DVD's for $0.20, sell them for $3.
Any DVD which fails I return the cost so my profit is only interest on the $3 for however many years (say average 5years, $0.60 profit which covers my cost 3X).
I also make the entire $3 for any DVD's destroyed (shredded confidential data, etc), lost, etc.Longevity claims by the manufacturer or seller are irrelevant, unless backed by some $ numbers.
I bet Synthetic Stone's EULA states the warranty liability is the cost of the disk at most.
Now, if there was insurance I could buy on this, the cost of this insurance would tell me the real reliability.
If they are confident it's a 1 in a million chance for the disk to fail in 100 years, they should be able to sell me 100 year insurance for $1 which will pay $500,000 if that happens AND this would still net them $0.50 per disk profit (1M disks sold, $1M revenue, 1 $500K payout, $500K profit on 1M disks).
If the odds differ for expected failure of 1, 10, 100, 1000 years, they should price the "insurance policies" accordingly.
Then I'd believe it (and no, the "insurance company" cannot be a separate LLC which goes bankrupt every time there is a payout, it must tie to the original company or better yet be backed by a major insurance company).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082882</id>
	<title>will it be shot down?</title>
	<author>the\_Bionic\_lemming</author>
	<datestamp>1258041360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Knowing that a significant revenue source for the distributors of DVD's is the fact that people scratch and rebuy, will the various distributors allow it to prosper?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Knowing that a significant revenue source for the distributors of DVD 's is the fact that people scratch and rebuy , will the various distributors allow it to prosper ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knowing that a significant revenue source for the distributors of DVD's is the fact that people scratch and rebuy, will the various distributors allow it to prosper?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083114</id>
	<title>is this a joke ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258043100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DVD that can store data for 1000 years. Who cares even if it does ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DVD that can store data for 1000 years .
Who cares even if it does ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DVD that can store data for 1000 years.
Who cares even if it does ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30087552</id>
	<title>Re:Curious...</title>
	<author>pz</author>
	<datestamp>1258131480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>TFA quotes temperature resistance of 176 degrees. Fahrenheit. For a "synthetic stone" product that is supposed to be super durable, that is chickenshit. It's barely warmer than parked-car-in-summer-sun.</p><p>I have to wonder, did some journalist fail at accuracy, or are these things actually pretty painfully unexciting in terms of temperature resistance?</p></div><p>176F = 80C</p><p>That sounds like maximum operating, not storage, temperature for something stone-like.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA quotes temperature resistance of 176 degrees .
Fahrenheit. For a " synthetic stone " product that is supposed to be super durable , that is chickenshit .
It 's barely warmer than parked-car-in-summer-sun.I have to wonder , did some journalist fail at accuracy , or are these things actually pretty painfully unexciting in terms of temperature resistance ? 176F = 80CThat sounds like maximum operating , not storage , temperature for something stone-like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA quotes temperature resistance of 176 degrees.
Fahrenheit. For a "synthetic stone" product that is supposed to be super durable, that is chickenshit.
It's barely warmer than parked-car-in-summer-sun.I have to wonder, did some journalist fail at accuracy, or are these things actually pretty painfully unexciting in terms of temperature resistance?176F = 80CThat sounds like maximum operating, not storage, temperature for something stone-like.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083382</id>
	<title>Re:Stone DVDs?</title>
	<author>Stupid McStupidson</author>
	<datestamp>1258045500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just want to know where the pterodactyls that fit inside a DVD burner come from</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just want to know where the pterodactyls that fit inside a DVD burner come from</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just want to know where the pterodactyls that fit inside a DVD burner come from</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083236</id>
	<title>Is it took much to ask for something afordable?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258044180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At 60X the cost of a standard DVD it's pretty much for the buyer with no other choice. I want a stable solution for movies. I'm willing to pay the price for even Blu-rays but what pisses me off are the fact over half my DVDs give me a bad sector warning at least once. That's from the factory and it gets worse even after a year or two. I happily bought Laserdisks which were much more expensive but at least they were good quality. They degraded but they tended to work from the factory. The image quality may be better on DVDs than VHS but the product quality is much worse. I want archival quality retail products, movies and music. I'm tired of rebuying products because of poor quality media.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At 60X the cost of a standard DVD it 's pretty much for the buyer with no other choice .
I want a stable solution for movies .
I 'm willing to pay the price for even Blu-rays but what pisses me off are the fact over half my DVDs give me a bad sector warning at least once .
That 's from the factory and it gets worse even after a year or two .
I happily bought Laserdisks which were much more expensive but at least they were good quality .
They degraded but they tended to work from the factory .
The image quality may be better on DVDs than VHS but the product quality is much worse .
I want archival quality retail products , movies and music .
I 'm tired of rebuying products because of poor quality media .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At 60X the cost of a standard DVD it's pretty much for the buyer with no other choice.
I want a stable solution for movies.
I'm willing to pay the price for even Blu-rays but what pisses me off are the fact over half my DVDs give me a bad sector warning at least once.
That's from the factory and it gets worse even after a year or two.
I happily bought Laserdisks which were much more expensive but at least they were good quality.
They degraded but they tended to work from the factory.
The image quality may be better on DVDs than VHS but the product quality is much worse.
I want archival quality retail products, movies and music.
I'm tired of rebuying products because of poor quality media.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082886</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258041360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*Currently playing an 8 year old burned CD with no issues*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* Currently playing an 8 year old burned CD with no issues *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*Currently playing an 8 year old burned CD with no issues*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30117808</id>
	<title>Gregorian Monks used Stone Temple Cassettes</title>
	<author>ClintJCL</author>
	<datestamp>1258396920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"I bet if Gregorian Monks had audio recording technology, it would be called Stone Temple Cassettes".</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I bet if Gregorian Monks had audio recording technology , it would be called Stone Temple Cassettes " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I bet if Gregorian Monks had audio recording technology, it would be called Stone Temple Cassettes".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084468</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>purpledinoz</author>
	<datestamp>1258104120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But rock beats scissors! but scissors beats paper, and paper beats rock.... hmmm quite a conundrum.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But rock beats scissors !
but scissors beats paper , and paper beats rock.... hmmm quite a conundrum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But rock beats scissors!
but scissors beats paper, and paper beats rock.... hmmm quite a conundrum.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084066</id>
	<title>Re:Hate these claims: These guys can't lose</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258054200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will your bridge last a thousand years?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will your bridge last a thousand years ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will your bridge last a thousand years?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30099882</id>
	<title>It's about time somebody did this...</title>
	<author>Wolfrider</author>
	<datestamp>1258230120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>--Despite the jokes, seriously - I've long been thinking this would be the best way to archive stuff that you NEVER want to lose.  Think " Dead Sea Scrolls " type longevity.</p><p>--Stone Just Doesn't Wear if properly cared for - and should still be mostly readable if -not- cared for. These discs will likely last for generations, even if you put them at the bottom of the ocean in a Baggie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>--Despite the jokes , seriously - I 've long been thinking this would be the best way to archive stuff that you NEVER want to lose .
Think " Dead Sea Scrolls " type longevity.--Stone Just Does n't Wear if properly cared for - and should still be mostly readable if -not- cared for .
These discs will likely last for generations , even if you put them at the bottom of the ocean in a Baggie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>--Despite the jokes, seriously - I've long been thinking this would be the best way to archive stuff that you NEVER want to lose.
Think " Dead Sea Scrolls " type longevity.--Stone Just Doesn't Wear if properly cared for - and should still be mostly readable if -not- cared for.
These discs will likely last for generations, even if you put them at the bottom of the ocean in a Baggie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085642</id>
	<title>Re:is this a joke ?</title>
	<author>cherokee158</author>
	<datestamp>1258121040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Library of Congress cares, which is who spurred the research into this media. And you should, too, if you want any portion of our culture preserved for future generations.</p><p>The widespread contempt for creating anything of lasting value I see almost everywhere today speaks volumes about both this generation's shortsightedness and its selfishness.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Library of Congress cares , which is who spurred the research into this media .
And you should , too , if you want any portion of our culture preserved for future generations.The widespread contempt for creating anything of lasting value I see almost everywhere today speaks volumes about both this generation 's shortsightedness and its selfishness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Library of Congress cares, which is who spurred the research into this media.
And you should, too, if you want any portion of our culture preserved for future generations.The widespread contempt for creating anything of lasting value I see almost everywhere today speaks volumes about both this generation's shortsightedness and its selfishness.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084884</id>
	<title>Re:Finally, a convenient alternative to pyramids..</title>
	<author>Matrix14</author>
	<datestamp>1258110720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Papyrus lasts thousands of years in the right conditions, and it has a slightly higher data density than carved stone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Papyrus lasts thousands of years in the right conditions , and it has a slightly higher data density than carved stone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Papyrus lasts thousands of years in the right conditions, and it has a slightly higher data density than carved stone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083310</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1258044840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>You know, when CDs and DVDs came out, they claimed they would last 50 years</i></p><p>I've had one music CD fail on me, out of several hundred.  My oldest is from 1987.</p><p>CD-R's do have high failure rate, in my experience.  Most of my "Kodak Gold" discs from 1996 are filled with errors.  My newer (post 2002) discs are all Taiyo Yuden, and knock on cyanine they're still all good (but not as old).</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , when CDs and DVDs came out , they claimed they would last 50 yearsI 've had one music CD fail on me , out of several hundred .
My oldest is from 1987.CD-R 's do have high failure rate , in my experience .
Most of my " Kodak Gold " discs from 1996 are filled with errors .
My newer ( post 2002 ) discs are all Taiyo Yuden , and knock on cyanine they 're still all good ( but not as old ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> You know, when CDs and DVDs came out, they claimed they would last 50 yearsI've had one music CD fail on me, out of several hundred.
My oldest is from 1987.CD-R's do have high failure rate, in my experience.
Most of my "Kodak Gold" discs from 1996 are filled with errors.
My newer (post 2002) discs are all Taiyo Yuden, and knock on cyanine they're still all good (but not as old).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082788</id>
	<title>Expensive</title>
	<author>techrolla</author>
	<datestamp>1258040580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's going to be really hard to convince average computer users who think their data will last forever that it won't.  And after 50 years no one might even own dvd players.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's going to be really hard to convince average computer users who think their data will last forever that it wo n't .
And after 50 years no one might even own dvd players .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's going to be really hard to convince average computer users who think their data will last forever that it won't.
And after 50 years no one might even own dvd players.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30092262</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258109220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Burned or stamped?</p><p>My stepfather has an extensive collection of CDs he bought in the mid-to-late 80s that play as well today as they did back when he bought them.  I ripped a Cars album without need for any cdparanoia correction.  The resulting file played fine.</p></div><p>  Used too work for Sony Music in the "Clean Room" where they pressed the CD's. The quailty of the Commercial product is superior to the Grab Bag of disks that you get from Staples, etc. By the way,don't drop those stone disks whatever you do. Couldn't help myself on that one.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Burned or stamped ? My stepfather has an extensive collection of CDs he bought in the mid-to-late 80s that play as well today as they did back when he bought them .
I ripped a Cars album without need for any cdparanoia correction .
The resulting file played fine .
Used too work for Sony Music in the " Clean Room " where they pressed the CD 's .
The quailty of the Commercial product is superior to the Grab Bag of disks that you get from Staples , etc .
By the way,do n't drop those stone disks whatever you do .
Could n't help myself on that one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Burned or stamped?My stepfather has an extensive collection of CDs he bought in the mid-to-late 80s that play as well today as they did back when he bought them.
I ripped a Cars album without need for any cdparanoia correction.
The resulting file played fine.
Used too work for Sony Music in the "Clean Room" where they pressed the CD's.
The quailty of the Commercial product is superior to the Grab Bag of disks that you get from Staples, etc.
By the way,don't drop those stone disks whatever you do.
Couldn't help myself on that one.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083488</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258046760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But, I want socialized health insurance!</p></div><p>Then lobby for it in your state.  I do not want it, don't threaten me with <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/027124\_health\_health\_insurance\_America.html" title="naturalnews.com" rel="nofollow">violence</a> [naturalnews.com] if I don't want to be a part of it.  Do it at the state level so I can choose not to live there.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But , I want socialized health insurance ! Then lobby for it in your state .
I do not want it , do n't threaten me with violence [ naturalnews.com ] if I do n't want to be a part of it .
Do it at the state level so I can choose not to live there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But, I want socialized health insurance!Then lobby for it in your state.
I do not want it, don't threaten me with violence [naturalnews.com] if I don't want to be a part of it.
Do it at the state level so I can choose not to live there.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082728</id>
	<title>What the bets the first release will be...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258040100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>..."The 10 commandments" Remastered Special Edition.<br>It's the 2 (Synthetic) Stone DVD Version...</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>... " The 10 commandments " Remastered Special Edition.It 's the 2 ( Synthetic ) Stone DVD Version.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..."The 10 commandments" Remastered Special Edition.It's the 2 (Synthetic) Stone DVD Version...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085946</id>
	<title>Re:Finally, a convenient alternative to pyramids..</title>
	<author>sanjosanjo</author>
	<datestamp>1258123500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hopefully the receipt and warranty card will last 1000 years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully the receipt and warranty card will last 1000 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully the receipt and warranty card will last 1000 years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083016</id>
	<title>Re:What the bets the first release will be...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258042440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It better include the Adam Smithee version and the 2 deleted Commandments that the producer made God cut out as 10 tested better with audiences.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It better include the Adam Smithee version and the 2 deleted Commandments that the producer made God cut out as 10 tested better with audiences .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It better include the Adam Smithee version and the 2 deleted Commandments that the producer made God cut out as 10 tested better with audiences.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083568</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1258047900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then let's make the DVDs out of water! Oh wait...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then let 's make the DVDs out of water !
Oh wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then let's make the DVDs out of water!
Oh wait...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083842</id>
	<title>Guaranteed!</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1258051620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... or your money back!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... or your money back !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... or your money back!
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085362</id>
	<title>Re:If you're actually interested in buying these..</title>
	<author>PhilHibbs</author>
	<datestamp>1258118100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just stumbled across this on the Long Now web site.<br><a href="http://blog.longnow.org/2009/10/22/millenniata-now-shipping/" title="longnow.org">http://blog.longnow.org/2009/10/22/millenniata-now-shipping/</a> [longnow.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just stumbled across this on the Long Now web site.http : //blog.longnow.org/2009/10/22/millenniata-now-shipping/ [ longnow.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just stumbled across this on the Long Now web site.http://blog.longnow.org/2009/10/22/millenniata-now-shipping/ [longnow.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30089834</id>
	<title>Cant wait...</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1258141320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can't wait till these are the same price as regular dvds,<br>
&nbsp; but until then I am sure that 5$ per dvd, is not really what I plan to pay...!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't wait till these are the same price as regular dvds ,   but until then I am sure that 5 $ per dvd , is not really what I plan to pay... ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't wait till these are the same price as regular dvds,
  but until then I am sure that 5$ per dvd, is not really what I plan to pay...!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084004</id>
	<title>Re:Finally, a convenient alternative to pyramids..</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1258053420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shut it Metheuselah. Stop bragging.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Shut it Metheuselah .
Stop bragging .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shut it Metheuselah.
Stop bragging.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082762</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083208</id>
	<title>Re:Curious...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258043940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://cranberry.com/faqs.php" title="cranberry.com">http://cranberry.com/faqs.php</a> [cranberry.com] </p><p><div class="quote"><p> <b>How is the Cranberry Disc(TM) different from regular DVDs?</b><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Instead [of organic dyes], the Cranberry Disc's data layer is composed of rocklike materials known to last for centuries. The Cranberry Writer(TM) etches the Cranberry Disc's rocklike layer creating a permanent physical data record that is immune to data rot.</p><p><b>What temperature can the Cranberry Disc withstand?</b><br>The Cranberry Discs can withstand temperatures of 176F indefinitely with no effect to the data or the readability of the data in a standard DVD drive.</p><p><b>Can the Cranberry Disc withstand UV rays and prolonged exposure to the sun?</b><br>Cranberry Discs can withstand the full spectrum of the sun, including UV rays, indefinitely with no effect to the data or the readability of the data in a standard DVD drive.</p></div><p>The data layer is their synthetic material.<br>Presumably, they still sandwich it between plastics that are vulnerable to heat.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //cranberry.com/faqs.php [ cranberry.com ] How is the Cranberry Disc ( TM ) different from regular DVDs ?
... Instead [ of organic dyes ] , the Cranberry Disc 's data layer is composed of rocklike materials known to last for centuries .
The Cranberry Writer ( TM ) etches the Cranberry Disc 's rocklike layer creating a permanent physical data record that is immune to data rot.What temperature can the Cranberry Disc withstand ? The Cranberry Discs can withstand temperatures of 176F indefinitely with no effect to the data or the readability of the data in a standard DVD drive.Can the Cranberry Disc withstand UV rays and prolonged exposure to the sun ? Cranberry Discs can withstand the full spectrum of the sun , including UV rays , indefinitely with no effect to the data or the readability of the data in a standard DVD drive.The data layer is their synthetic material.Presumably , they still sandwich it between plastics that are vulnerable to heat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://cranberry.com/faqs.php [cranberry.com]  How is the Cranberry Disc(TM) different from regular DVDs?
... Instead [of organic dyes], the Cranberry Disc's data layer is composed of rocklike materials known to last for centuries.
The Cranberry Writer(TM) etches the Cranberry Disc's rocklike layer creating a permanent physical data record that is immune to data rot.What temperature can the Cranberry Disc withstand?The Cranberry Discs can withstand temperatures of 176F indefinitely with no effect to the data or the readability of the data in a standard DVD drive.Can the Cranberry Disc withstand UV rays and prolonged exposure to the sun?Cranberry Discs can withstand the full spectrum of the sun, including UV rays, indefinitely with no effect to the data or the readability of the data in a standard DVD drive.The data layer is their synthetic material.Presumably, they still sandwich it between plastics that are vulnerable to heat.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084508</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>surferx0</author>
	<datestamp>1258104960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Water beats rock every time.</p></div><p>And god forbid it comes into contact with paper</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Water beats rock every time.And god forbid it comes into contact with paper</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Water beats rock every time.And god forbid it comes into contact with paper
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082858</id>
	<title>Pits?</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1258041120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Recordable DVDs don't use pits, do they?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Recordable DVDs do n't use pits , do they ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Recordable DVDs don't use pits, do they?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082948</id>
	<title>badass</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258041840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope it works as advertised.</p><p>Even if it only lasts for 10\% of the advertised time.  There have been all kinds of questions about safeguarding and backing up data to insure that it won't go bad in a couple years and if this turns out to be a good solution then great.</p><p>Course, I'm not ever going to buy from them so my feelings won't be hurt if it's a crock of shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope it works as advertised.Even if it only lasts for 10 \ % of the advertised time .
There have been all kinds of questions about safeguarding and backing up data to insure that it wo n't go bad in a couple years and if this turns out to be a good solution then great.Course , I 'm not ever going to buy from them so my feelings wo n't be hurt if it 's a crock of shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope it works as advertised.Even if it only lasts for 10\% of the advertised time.
There have been all kinds of questions about safeguarding and backing up data to insure that it won't go bad in a couple years and if this turns out to be a good solution then great.Course, I'm not ever going to buy from them so my feelings won't be hurt if it's a crock of shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30091738</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>formfeed</author>
	<datestamp>1258106400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Burned. <p>
And that has been the problem so far. Most archives are still holding on to their micro film, even when they hand out CDs for every day use. There is a real need for an up-to-date archival medium. Unforunatly that demand hasn't been met by the industry yet, mainly because archives aren't a huge market like consumer electronics. And despite what politicans claim sometimes, they also aren't seen as critical. If they "fail", no production capacity is lost, just our cultural heritage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Burned .
And that has been the problem so far .
Most archives are still holding on to their micro film , even when they hand out CDs for every day use .
There is a real need for an up-to-date archival medium .
Unforunatly that demand has n't been met by the industry yet , mainly because archives are n't a huge market like consumer electronics .
And despite what politicans claim sometimes , they also are n't seen as critical .
If they " fail " , no production capacity is lost , just our cultural heritage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Burned.
And that has been the problem so far.
Most archives are still holding on to their micro film, even when they hand out CDs for every day use.
There is a real need for an up-to-date archival medium.
Unforunatly that demand hasn't been met by the industry yet, mainly because archives aren't a huge market like consumer electronics.
And despite what politicans claim sometimes, they also aren't seen as critical.
If they "fail", no production capacity is lost, just our cultural heritage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082826</id>
	<title>Microwavable?</title>
	<author>bigjarom</author>
	<datestamp>1258040880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unless they still make the cool sparking design whilst in the microwave, I am not interested!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless they still make the cool sparking design whilst in the microwave , I am not interested !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless they still make the cool sparking design whilst in the microwave, I am not interested!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083968</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258053240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nothing beats rock</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing beats rock</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing beats rock</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30093066</id>
	<title>1,000 years?  ORLY?</title>
	<author>Rogerborg</author>
	<datestamp>1258114380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll sell you one that looks exactly the same - heck, it may even have their name on it - but my discs?  They'll last for, oh, let's say 5,000 years.  Did I say 5,000?  I meant 10,000.  And they only cost 20\% more!  Checks made out to "CASH", please.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll sell you one that looks exactly the same - heck , it may even have their name on it - but my discs ?
They 'll last for , oh , let 's say 5,000 years .
Did I say 5,000 ?
I meant 10,000 .
And they only cost 20 \ % more !
Checks made out to " CASH " , please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll sell you one that looks exactly the same - heck, it may even have their name on it - but my discs?
They'll last for, oh, let's say 5,000 years.
Did I say 5,000?
I meant 10,000.
And they only cost 20\% more!
Checks made out to "CASH", please.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30095100</id>
	<title>In 31st century there will be no DVD-ROM drives...</title>
	<author>galanom</author>
	<datestamp>1258134540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>my 2</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>my 2</tokentext>
<sentencetext>my 2</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083428</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258045920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good for you. I guess that no one has the problem since you don't have it. I have commercial pressed DVDs and CDs, kept in a climate controlled area that can't be read at all and they are only 3 to 5 years old. In fact, I have over 120 of them that have gone bad. Your statement is like saying you know a guy who smoked and didn't get cancer so smoking doesn't cause cancer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good for you .
I guess that no one has the problem since you do n't have it .
I have commercial pressed DVDs and CDs , kept in a climate controlled area that ca n't be read at all and they are only 3 to 5 years old .
In fact , I have over 120 of them that have gone bad .
Your statement is like saying you know a guy who smoked and did n't get cancer so smoking does n't cause cancer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good for you.
I guess that no one has the problem since you don't have it.
I have commercial pressed DVDs and CDs, kept in a climate controlled area that can't be read at all and they are only 3 to 5 years old.
In fact, I have over 120 of them that have gone bad.
Your statement is like saying you know a guy who smoked and didn't get cancer so smoking doesn't cause cancer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082950</id>
	<title>Convienient...</title>
	<author>smitty777</author>
	<datestamp>1258041840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...it will probably take about that long for me to figure out the lyrics to my  Municipal Waste  DVD.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...it will probably take about that long for me to figure out the lyrics to my Municipal Waste DVD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...it will probably take about that long for me to figure out the lyrics to my  Municipal Waste  DVD.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084040</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>DudemanX</author>
	<datestamp>1258053900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Water beats Rock, Fire, and Ground.</p><p>Water is vulnerable however to Grass and Electric.</p><p>Here's a helpful <a href="http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Type\_chart" title="bulbagarden.net" rel="nofollow">chart</a> [bulbagarden.net].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Water beats Rock , Fire , and Ground.Water is vulnerable however to Grass and Electric.Here 's a helpful chart [ bulbagarden.net ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Water beats Rock, Fire, and Ground.Water is vulnerable however to Grass and Electric.Here's a helpful chart [bulbagarden.net].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082772</id>
	<title>1000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258040460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>We'll see.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 'll see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We'll see.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>onemorechip</author>
	<datestamp>1258042560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Water beats rock every time.</p></div><p>No, paper beats rock. There's no water in the game.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Water beats rock every time.No , paper beats rock .
There 's no water in the game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Water beats rock every time.No, paper beats rock.
There's no water in the game.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083828</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>GrahamCox</author>
	<datestamp>1258051500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i> when CDs and DVDs came out, they claimed they would last 50 years. I have yet to find one that lasts longer than 5</i> <br> <br>
What on earth are you doing to them? The first CD I ever bought (Dark Side of the Moon I'm afraid) in 1986 still plays just fine. CDRs, perhaps another matter - I have some now that are not always readable - seems to depend on the drive - but are over 12 years old. Luckily there's nothing of value on them - funny how I burned so much stuff I thought I'd need, but never did.</htmltext>
<tokenext>when CDs and DVDs came out , they claimed they would last 50 years .
I have yet to find one that lasts longer than 5 What on earth are you doing to them ?
The first CD I ever bought ( Dark Side of the Moon I 'm afraid ) in 1986 still plays just fine .
CDRs , perhaps another matter - I have some now that are not always readable - seems to depend on the drive - but are over 12 years old .
Luckily there 's nothing of value on them - funny how I burned so much stuff I thought I 'd need , but never did .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> when CDs and DVDs came out, they claimed they would last 50 years.
I have yet to find one that lasts longer than 5  
What on earth are you doing to them?
The first CD I ever bought (Dark Side of the Moon I'm afraid) in 1986 still plays just fine.
CDRs, perhaps another matter - I have some now that are not always readable - seems to depend on the drive - but are over 12 years old.
Luckily there's nothing of value on them - funny how I burned so much stuff I thought I'd need, but never did.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084058</id>
	<title>And that would make an appropriate product slogan</title>
	<author>ericvids</author>
	<datestamp>1258054080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Don't let it burn, don't let it fade"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Do n't let it burn , do n't let it fade "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Don't let it burn, don't let it fade"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083700</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>garompeta</author>
	<datestamp>1258050060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What about spit? Spit always wins.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about spit ?
Spit always wins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about spit?
Spit always wins.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084404</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>mehrotra.akash</author>
	<datestamp>1258145640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have no name CD-R's from more than 10 yrs back which are in perfect condition..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have no name CD-R 's from more than 10 yrs back which are in perfect condition. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have no name CD-R's from more than 10 yrs back which are in perfect condition..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085670</id>
	<title>I have a feeling this entire concept...</title>
	<author>trum4n</author>
	<datestamp>1258121340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...is gonna drop like a rock.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...is gon na drop like a rock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...is gonna drop like a rock.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085238</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>AC-x</author>
	<datestamp>1258116300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Y'know I recently moved my collection of CD-R and DVD-R burnt (backups, of course<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;) movies onto an external harddrive, a lot of the discs in there were 7,8 even 9 years old and all of them read fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Y'know I recently moved my collection of CD-R and DVD-R burnt ( backups , of course ; ) movies onto an external harddrive , a lot of the discs in there were 7,8 even 9 years old and all of them read fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Y'know I recently moved my collection of CD-R and DVD-R burnt (backups, of course ;) movies onto an external harddrive, a lot of the discs in there were 7,8 even 9 years old and all of them read fine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084092</id>
	<title>Re:Curious...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258054620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In fact, it's only 176 Kelvins</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In fact , it 's only 176 Kelvins</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In fact, it's only 176 Kelvins</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084124</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>matty619</author>
	<datestamp>1258055100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You know, when CDs and DVDs came out, they claimed they would last 50 years. I have yet to find one that lasts longer than 5.</p></div><p>Really?  I've got a whole stack of CD's from the late 80's, sure some are a bit scratched up, and maybe skip a little, but most play just as good as the day I bought them, 20 years ago.  As far as CD-R's go, I have many from the late 90's back when they had a much darker blue dye, some of their reflective coatings are beginning to flake off, but in general, most of them still work.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , when CDs and DVDs came out , they claimed they would last 50 years .
I have yet to find one that lasts longer than 5.Really ?
I 've got a whole stack of CD 's from the late 80 's , sure some are a bit scratched up , and maybe skip a little , but most play just as good as the day I bought them , 20 years ago .
As far as CD-R 's go , I have many from the late 90 's back when they had a much darker blue dye , some of their reflective coatings are beginning to flake off , but in general , most of them still work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, when CDs and DVDs came out, they claimed they would last 50 years.
I have yet to find one that lasts longer than 5.Really?
I've got a whole stack of CD's from the late 80's, sure some are a bit scratched up, and maybe skip a little, but most play just as good as the day I bought them, 20 years ago.
As far as CD-R's go, I have many from the late 90's back when they had a much darker blue dye, some of their reflective coatings are beginning to flake off, but in general, most of them still work.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084048</id>
	<title>Re:This new archival format from Cranberry...</title>
	<author>TheModelEskimo</author>
	<datestamp>1258054020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>*silence*<br> <br> <br> <br>*beating drums resume*<br> <br> <br> <br>*faint strumming*</htmltext>
<tokenext>* silence * * beating drums resume * * faint strumming *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*silence*   *beating drums resume*   *faint strumming*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082848</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258041060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Water beats rock every time.</p></div><p>I thought it was rock, paper, scissors, lizard, spock.  Where'd the water come from?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Water beats rock every time.I thought it was rock , paper , scissors , lizard , spock .
Where 'd the water come from ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Water beats rock every time.I thought it was rock, paper, scissors, lizard, spock.
Where'd the water come from?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084114</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Black Sabbath</author>
	<datestamp>1258054980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Water beats rock every time.</p><p>I thought it was paper that beat rock?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Water beats rock every time.I thought it was paper that beat rock ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Water beats rock every time.I thought it was paper that beat rock?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083966</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258053180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In fact the CD/DVD only need to last 10 years and by that time, the startup is acquired/IPO whatever and people are happy with their bank account.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In fact the CD/DVD only need to last 10 years and by that time , the startup is acquired/IPO whatever and people are happy with their bank account .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In fact the CD/DVD only need to last 10 years and by that time, the startup is acquired/IPO whatever and people are happy with their bank account.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30104708</id>
	<title>Re:$30...</title>
	<author>stms</author>
	<datestamp>1258276260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously I scored 0, John Hasler's comment got +2 and it was completely off topic, wrong and, irrelevant. Fuck slashdot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously I scored 0 , John Hasler 's comment got + 2 and it was completely off topic , wrong and , irrelevant .
Fuck slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously I scored 0, John Hasler's comment got +2 and it was completely off topic, wrong and, irrelevant.
Fuck slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083836</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083124</id>
	<title>Made from Diamondium or Diamondillium?</title>
	<author>ndelta</author>
	<datestamp>1258043160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It won't deteriorate. Until some trans-dimensional being gets shklis or shkler tentacles on it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It wo n't deteriorate .
Until some trans-dimensional being gets shklis or shkler tentacles on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It won't deteriorate.
Until some trans-dimensional being gets shklis or shkler tentacles on it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082800</id>
	<title>Only one downside</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258040700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.000000000000000001x record rate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The .000000000000000001x record rate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The .000000000000000001x record rate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084200</id>
	<title>I'm sure they did some excellent product testing!</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1258142760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You know, when CDs and DVDs came out, they claimed they would last 50 years.</p></div><p>Obviously they did extensive 50-year tests of each of their competing best designs.  Then went a couple of design iterations, testing each of them, such that they had some evidence to back up that claim.</p><p>Which leads you to the startling conclusion that the Stone DVDs were first sketched out on mount Sinai, then the design was tested throughout generations.</p><p>Seriously, they'll last a 1000 years?  How do they know?  What model predicts this?  What's the evidence for the validity of that model?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , when CDs and DVDs came out , they claimed they would last 50 years.Obviously they did extensive 50-year tests of each of their competing best designs .
Then went a couple of design iterations , testing each of them , such that they had some evidence to back up that claim.Which leads you to the startling conclusion that the Stone DVDs were first sketched out on mount Sinai , then the design was tested throughout generations.Seriously , they 'll last a 1000 years ?
How do they know ?
What model predicts this ?
What 's the evidence for the validity of that model ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, when CDs and DVDs came out, they claimed they would last 50 years.Obviously they did extensive 50-year tests of each of their competing best designs.
Then went a couple of design iterations, testing each of them, such that they had some evidence to back up that claim.Which leads you to the startling conclusion that the Stone DVDs were first sketched out on mount Sinai, then the design was tested throughout generations.Seriously, they'll last a 1000 years?
How do they know?
What model predicts this?
What's the evidence for the validity of that model?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30091614</id>
	<title>Re:is this a joke ?</title>
	<author>formfeed</author>
	<datestamp>1258105860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The widespread contempt for creating anything of lasting value I see almost everywhere today speaks volumes about both this generation's shortsightedness and its selfishness.</p></div> </blockquote><p>
Your rant is hardly original. Thanks to the lasting quality of books, I could show you similar complaints about "this generation" in several texts for the last 2000 years.
</p><p>
I'd say this generation is no more selfish and shortsighted than, let's say, some roman youth right before the fall of the empire.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The widespread contempt for creating anything of lasting value I see almost everywhere today speaks volumes about both this generation 's shortsightedness and its selfishness .
Your rant is hardly original .
Thanks to the lasting quality of books , I could show you similar complaints about " this generation " in several texts for the last 2000 years .
I 'd say this generation is no more selfish and shortsighted than , let 's say , some roman youth right before the fall of the empire .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The widespread contempt for creating anything of lasting value I see almost everywhere today speaks volumes about both this generation's shortsightedness and its selfishness.
Your rant is hardly original.
Thanks to the lasting quality of books, I could show you similar complaints about "this generation" in several texts for the last 2000 years.
I'd say this generation is no more selfish and shortsighted than, let's say, some roman youth right before the fall of the empire.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082794</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>stinerman</author>
	<datestamp>1258040580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Burned or stamped?</p><p>My stepfather has an extensive collection of CDs he bought in the mid-to-late 80s that play as well today as they did back when he bought them.  I ripped a Cars album without need for any cdparanoia correction.  The resulting file played fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Burned or stamped ? My stepfather has an extensive collection of CDs he bought in the mid-to-late 80s that play as well today as they did back when he bought them .
I ripped a Cars album without need for any cdparanoia correction .
The resulting file played fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Burned or stamped?My stepfather has an extensive collection of CDs he bought in the mid-to-late 80s that play as well today as they did back when he bought them.
I ripped a Cars album without need for any cdparanoia correction.
The resulting file played fine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083696</id>
	<title>Errr...</title>
	<author>Arimus</author>
	<datestamp>1258050000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How the ? does this work?</p><p>Laser light is reflected off the reflective substrate and its the difference in the reflection pattern which shows its reading a pit or not... so with no reflective surface fail to see how this is going to work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How the ?
does this work ? Laser light is reflected off the reflective substrate and its the difference in the reflection pattern which shows its reading a pit or not... so with no reflective surface fail to see how this is going to work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How the ?
does this work?Laser light is reflected off the reflective substrate and its the difference in the reflection pattern which shows its reading a pit or not... so with no reflective surface fail to see how this is going to work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084412</id>
	<title>Re:will it be shot down?</title>
	<author>DrXym</author>
	<datestamp>1258145820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It isn't for distributors, it is for data centers and the like.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is n't for distributors , it is for data centers and the like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It isn't for distributors, it is for data centers and the like.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30087250</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>interploy</author>
	<datestamp>1258130100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really don't see the point. Even if DVD readers are somehow around in 1,000 years, any information worth keeping around that long will have been reproduced and updated constantly during that entire period.  Look at any major religion; each has countless numbers of editions of their texts. And history is constantly being revised. The same with scientific works; all constantly changing and being updated. So what's left? Am I going to store my financial records and music for a 1,000 years so some guy in the future can throw away my information as completely irrelevant and tasteless?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really do n't see the point .
Even if DVD readers are somehow around in 1,000 years , any information worth keeping around that long will have been reproduced and updated constantly during that entire period .
Look at any major religion ; each has countless numbers of editions of their texts .
And history is constantly being revised .
The same with scientific works ; all constantly changing and being updated .
So what 's left ?
Am I going to store my financial records and music for a 1,000 years so some guy in the future can throw away my information as completely irrelevant and tasteless ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really don't see the point.
Even if DVD readers are somehow around in 1,000 years, any information worth keeping around that long will have been reproduced and updated constantly during that entire period.
Look at any major religion; each has countless numbers of editions of their texts.
And history is constantly being revised.
The same with scientific works; all constantly changing and being updated.
So what's left?
Am I going to store my financial records and music for a 1,000 years so some guy in the future can throw away my information as completely irrelevant and tasteless?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083266</id>
	<title>Re:Curious...</title>
	<author>jda104</author>
	<datestamp>1258044480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Their site states "300 degrees" (F?).<br> <br>
Ironically, they also sell a safe into which you can put your super-durable DVDs. They list as one of the justifications:<br>
"Fire. The DVD can withstand temperatures as high as 300 degrees. Unless you can make sure that your house doesn't burn down at more than 300 degrees, you need the DVD Vault."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Their site states " 300 degrees " ( F ? ) .
Ironically , they also sell a safe into which you can put your super-durable DVDs .
They list as one of the justifications : " Fire .
The DVD can withstand temperatures as high as 300 degrees .
Unless you can make sure that your house does n't burn down at more than 300 degrees , you need the DVD Vault .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their site states "300 degrees" (F?).
Ironically, they also sell a safe into which you can put your super-durable DVDs.
They list as one of the justifications:
"Fire.
The DVD can withstand temperatures as high as 300 degrees.
Unless you can make sure that your house doesn't burn down at more than 300 degrees, you need the DVD Vault.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30088876</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258137780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>There's no water in the game.</i></p><p>That's because it wouldn't be fair. Water beats rock and paper, and if the scissors are made out of steel, water beats those too! It's the ultimate weapon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's no water in the game.That 's because it would n't be fair .
Water beats rock and paper , and if the scissors are made out of steel , water beats those too !
It 's the ultimate weapon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's no water in the game.That's because it wouldn't be fair.
Water beats rock and paper, and if the scissors are made out of steel, water beats those too!
It's the ultimate weapon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084538</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>ch0rlt0n</author>
	<datestamp>1258105500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Five years!? You do realise they're not actually coffee coasters?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Five years ! ?
You do realise they 're not actually coffee coasters ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Five years!?
You do realise they're not actually coffee coasters?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083228</id>
	<title>other than laughing</title>
	<author>memnock</author>
	<datestamp>1258044120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>at our current high tech stuff, there can't be that many reason to worry about 1,000 year retention.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>at our current high tech stuff , there ca n't be that many reason to worry about 1,000 year retention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>at our current high tech stuff, there can't be that many reason to worry about 1,000 year retention.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30095218</id>
	<title>generations of stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258136400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Awesome... now in 1000 years people will be able to watch that burned copy of dirty sanchez. yay. thank-you guys!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Awesome... now in 1000 years people will be able to watch that burned copy of dirty sanchez .
yay. thank-you guys !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Awesome... now in 1000 years people will be able to watch that burned copy of dirty sanchez.
yay. thank-you guys!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082832</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258041000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>well, you're a fucking dumb ass. i have cds that are about 20 years old that are just fine and burnables for over a decade. i guess you just suck the big dick. dumb bitch.</htmltext>
<tokenext>well , you 're a fucking dumb ass .
i have cds that are about 20 years old that are just fine and burnables for over a decade .
i guess you just suck the big dick .
dumb bitch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well, you're a fucking dumb ass.
i have cds that are about 20 years old that are just fine and burnables for over a decade.
i guess you just suck the big dick.
dumb bitch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083816</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258051380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean you've never played Water, Rock, Scissors?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean you 've never played Water , Rock , Scissors ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean you've never played Water, Rock, Scissors?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083960</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258053120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>snake oil beats everyone<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>post-apocalypse people can use these rock discs to build houses with - and the normal see-through ones for windows</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>snake oil beats everyone : ) post-apocalypse people can use these rock discs to build houses with - and the normal see-through ones for windows</tokentext>
<sentencetext>snake oil beats everyone :)post-apocalypse people can use these rock discs to build houses with - and the normal see-through ones for windows</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083518</id>
	<title>If you're actually interested in buying these...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258047240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd recommend going straight to the company Cranberry is licensing from, <a href="http://http//www.millenniata.com/" title="http" rel="nofollow">Millenniata</a> [http].  It looks like you can purchase identical products for about 1/3 the price.  Cranberry's got one heck of a mark-up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd recommend going straight to the company Cranberry is licensing from , Millenniata [ http ] .
It looks like you can purchase identical products for about 1/3 the price .
Cranberry 's got one heck of a mark-up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd recommend going straight to the company Cranberry is licensing from, Millenniata [http].
It looks like you can purchase identical products for about 1/3 the price.
Cranberry's got one heck of a mark-up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30088556</id>
	<title>The Important Question Is...</title>
	<author>BiggoronSword</author>
	<datestamp>1258136580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Will it blend?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it blend ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it blend?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082854</id>
	<title>Re:What the bets the first release will be...</title>
	<author>Al Dunsmuir</author>
	<datestamp>1258041060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nope.... Flintstones!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope.... Flintstones !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope.... Flintstones!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30087492</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Wolvenhaven</author>
	<datestamp>1258131240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, Paper beats Rock.
<br>
Remember: Scissors cuts Paper, Paper covers Rock, Rock crushes Lizard, Lizard poisons Spock, Spock smashes Scissors, Scissors decapitates Lizard, Lizard eats Paper, Paper disproves Spock, Spock vaporizes Rock, and of course Rock crushes Scissors.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , Paper beats Rock .
Remember : Scissors cuts Paper , Paper covers Rock , Rock crushes Lizard , Lizard poisons Spock , Spock smashes Scissors , Scissors decapitates Lizard , Lizard eats Paper , Paper disproves Spock , Spock vaporizes Rock , and of course Rock crushes Scissors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, Paper beats Rock.
Remember: Scissors cuts Paper, Paper covers Rock, Rock crushes Lizard, Lizard poisons Spock, Spock smashes Scissors, Scissors decapitates Lizard, Lizard eats Paper, Paper disproves Spock, Spock vaporizes Rock, and of course Rock crushes Scissors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083586</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>value\_added</author>
	<datestamp>1258048080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>*Currently playing an 8 year old burned CD with no issues*</i></p><p>First, there are people who have experienced no problems, and there are people who have.  Saying that you belong to one group or another contributes nothing useful.</p><p>Second, a music file like an mp3 with a few flipped or unreadable bits may be playable, and the music may sound fine.  But that certainly doesn't mean the file isn't corrupted, or that the CD hasn't degraded or won't start degrading in the future.</p><p>Third, I'll wager that a CD bought 8 years ago (before the onslaught of multiple manufacturers and heavy discounting) is a very different CD than what's currently available on store shelves.</p><p>Enjoy your CD.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* Currently playing an 8 year old burned CD with no issues * First , there are people who have experienced no problems , and there are people who have .
Saying that you belong to one group or another contributes nothing useful.Second , a music file like an mp3 with a few flipped or unreadable bits may be playable , and the music may sound fine .
But that certainly does n't mean the file is n't corrupted , or that the CD has n't degraded or wo n't start degrading in the future.Third , I 'll wager that a CD bought 8 years ago ( before the onslaught of multiple manufacturers and heavy discounting ) is a very different CD than what 's currently available on store shelves.Enjoy your CD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*Currently playing an 8 year old burned CD with no issues*First, there are people who have experienced no problems, and there are people who have.
Saying that you belong to one group or another contributes nothing useful.Second, a music file like an mp3 with a few flipped or unreadable bits may be playable, and the music may sound fine.
But that certainly doesn't mean the file isn't corrupted, or that the CD hasn't degraded or won't start degrading in the future.Third, I'll wager that a CD bought 8 years ago (before the onslaught of multiple manufacturers and heavy discounting) is a very different CD than what's currently available on store shelves.Enjoy your CD.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084290</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years? How about a 10,000 year clock</title>
	<author>twosat</author>
	<datestamp>1258144140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some people are working on a mechanical binary clock to last 10,000 years.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clock\_of\_the\_Long\_Now</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some people are working on a mechanical binary clock to last 10,000 years .
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clock \ _of \ _the \ _Long \ _Now</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some people are working on a mechanical binary clock to last 10,000 years.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clock\_of\_the\_Long\_Now</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30112670</id>
	<title>Do they meet the specs?</title>
	<author>StreamingEagle</author>
	<datestamp>1258402140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Having spent the first 10 years of my career running glass mastering operations for 2 of the top companies in the business... I thought I should point a few things out.

The same accelerated environmental testing that this company cites shows that a well manufactured (pre-recorded) CD or DVD will also last well in excess of 1000 years, assuming it is handled properly and not subjected to extreme environmental conditions.  Recordable discs have a dye layer that is more susceptible to degradation, but a well manufactured CD-R or DVD-R will probably outlast the useful life of the data.

"DiamonDisc the burner etches much deeper pits" - seems to show a lack of understanding of how CDs and DVDs work.  To optimize the signal the pit should be an optimal width and depth.  Deeper is not better.

No reflective layer?  How do you read the disc?  I'll bet it's hard to meet the reflectivity spec without a reflective layer.  I wonder what the HF signals look like... the error rates, the jitter.  Have these discs been measured by an independent expert?  If they aren't in spec to begin with, I don't care that they last 1000 years.

To make CDs and DVDs economically, they need to be injection molded out of polycarbonate.  In any case, the disc must have a clear layer that is 0.6 mm thick, allowing the drive to properly focus on the information layer.  The "DiamonDisc" DVDs are almost certainly molded out of polycarbonate.  If the polycarbonate breaks down in a standard DVD, it will break down in this DVD.

If you want long lasting DVD-Rs, there are companies making them that have been in business for decades.  Get DVDs made with a pure gold reflective layer... they'll last longer than we will.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Having spent the first 10 years of my career running glass mastering operations for 2 of the top companies in the business... I thought I should point a few things out .
The same accelerated environmental testing that this company cites shows that a well manufactured ( pre-recorded ) CD or DVD will also last well in excess of 1000 years , assuming it is handled properly and not subjected to extreme environmental conditions .
Recordable discs have a dye layer that is more susceptible to degradation , but a well manufactured CD-R or DVD-R will probably outlast the useful life of the data .
" DiamonDisc the burner etches much deeper pits " - seems to show a lack of understanding of how CDs and DVDs work .
To optimize the signal the pit should be an optimal width and depth .
Deeper is not better .
No reflective layer ?
How do you read the disc ?
I 'll bet it 's hard to meet the reflectivity spec without a reflective layer .
I wonder what the HF signals look like... the error rates , the jitter .
Have these discs been measured by an independent expert ?
If they are n't in spec to begin with , I do n't care that they last 1000 years .
To make CDs and DVDs economically , they need to be injection molded out of polycarbonate .
In any case , the disc must have a clear layer that is 0.6 mm thick , allowing the drive to properly focus on the information layer .
The " DiamonDisc " DVDs are almost certainly molded out of polycarbonate .
If the polycarbonate breaks down in a standard DVD , it will break down in this DVD .
If you want long lasting DVD-Rs , there are companies making them that have been in business for decades .
Get DVDs made with a pure gold reflective layer... they 'll last longer than we will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having spent the first 10 years of my career running glass mastering operations for 2 of the top companies in the business... I thought I should point a few things out.
The same accelerated environmental testing that this company cites shows that a well manufactured (pre-recorded) CD or DVD will also last well in excess of 1000 years, assuming it is handled properly and not subjected to extreme environmental conditions.
Recordable discs have a dye layer that is more susceptible to degradation, but a well manufactured CD-R or DVD-R will probably outlast the useful life of the data.
"DiamonDisc the burner etches much deeper pits" - seems to show a lack of understanding of how CDs and DVDs work.
To optimize the signal the pit should be an optimal width and depth.
Deeper is not better.
No reflective layer?
How do you read the disc?
I'll bet it's hard to meet the reflectivity spec without a reflective layer.
I wonder what the HF signals look like... the error rates, the jitter.
Have these discs been measured by an independent expert?
If they aren't in spec to begin with, I don't care that they last 1000 years.
To make CDs and DVDs economically, they need to be injection molded out of polycarbonate.
In any case, the disc must have a clear layer that is 0.6 mm thick, allowing the drive to properly focus on the information layer.
The "DiamonDisc" DVDs are almost certainly molded out of polycarbonate.
If the polycarbonate breaks down in a standard DVD, it will break down in this DVD.
If you want long lasting DVD-Rs, there are companies making them that have been in business for decades.
Get DVDs made with a pure gold reflective layer... they'll last longer than we will.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30086120</id>
	<title>Re:Stone DVDs?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258124640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, there is <a href="http://images.google.ca/images?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=graphic+granite" title="google.ca" rel="nofollow">graphic granite</a> [google.ca].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , there is graphic granite [ google.ca ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, there is graphic granite [google.ca].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083718</id>
	<title>Re:Stone DVDs?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258050360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They'll come in several varieties: </p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... </p><ul> <li>Pornographic</li></ul></div><p>You must be referring to the StoneD<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... V.D.s</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll come in several varieties : ... PornographicYou must be referring to the StoneD ... V.D.s</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll come in several varieties:  ...  PornographicYou must be referring to the StoneD ... V.D.s
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085770</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258122240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;I really don't care if my archival storage can stand being left outside for several years, because I don't intend to do that.</p><p>really?  really you don't <i>intend</i> to do that? Let me tell you a few more things that weren't <i>intended</i>.  The Titanic wasn't <i>intended</i> to sink, so the captain didn't really care about the exact number of lifeboats on hand.  The Library of Alexandria wasn't <i>intended</i> to be burned to the ground.  German citizens in the thirties didn't <i>intend</i> their elected government to create an era that was to live on in infamy forever as synonymous with pure evil.  Vesuvius?  Not intended.  Katrina?  Not intended.  Let me tell you something: you can take your <i>intentions</i> and shove them where they, ahem, weren't intended.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I really do n't care if my archival storage can stand being left outside for several years , because I do n't intend to do that.really ?
really you do n't intend to do that ?
Let me tell you a few more things that were n't intended .
The Titanic was n't intended to sink , so the captain did n't really care about the exact number of lifeboats on hand .
The Library of Alexandria was n't intended to be burned to the ground .
German citizens in the thirties did n't intend their elected government to create an era that was to live on in infamy forever as synonymous with pure evil .
Vesuvius ? Not intended .
Katrina ? Not intended .
Let me tell you something : you can take your intentions and shove them where they , ahem , were n't intended .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;I really don't care if my archival storage can stand being left outside for several years, because I don't intend to do that.really?
really you don't intend to do that?
Let me tell you a few more things that weren't intended.
The Titanic wasn't intended to sink, so the captain didn't really care about the exact number of lifeboats on hand.
The Library of Alexandria wasn't intended to be burned to the ground.
German citizens in the thirties didn't intend their elected government to create an era that was to live on in infamy forever as synonymous with pure evil.
Vesuvius?  Not intended.
Katrina?  Not intended.
Let me tell you something: you can take your intentions and shove them where they, ahem, weren't intended.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083508</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>krou</author>
	<datestamp>1258047120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So I'd say, 1,000 years translates to about a hundred years, tops.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Don't worry, we've been told by some futurists and scientists that people born today will be able to defeat ageing, so it's likely that in 1,000 years someone, somewhere, will be able to sue them for false advertising when their Britney Spears album stops playing correctly.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So I 'd say , 1,000 years translates to about a hundred years , tops .
Do n't worry , we 've been told by some futurists and scientists that people born today will be able to defeat ageing , so it 's likely that in 1,000 years someone , somewhere , will be able to sue them for false advertising when their Britney Spears album stops playing correctly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I'd say, 1,000 years translates to about a hundred years, tops.
Don't worry, we've been told by some futurists and scientists that people born today will be able to defeat ageing, so it's likely that in 1,000 years someone, somewhere, will be able to sue them for false advertising when their Britney Spears album stops playing correctly.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30088138</id>
	<title>Re:What the bets the first release will be...</title>
	<author>Yewbert</author>
	<datestamp>1258134360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bingo!  On reading the phrase "synthetic stone DVD" I immediately pictured a Flintstone-esque bird with a very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very sharp beak, carefully etching tiny pits into a disc on a Flintstone-esque lathe or machine assembly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bingo !
On reading the phrase " synthetic stone DVD " I immediately pictured a Flintstone-esque bird with a very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very , very sharp beak , carefully etching tiny pits into a disc on a Flintstone-esque lathe or machine assembly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bingo!
On reading the phrase "synthetic stone DVD" I immediately pictured a Flintstone-esque bird with a very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very sharp beak, carefully etching tiny pits into a disc on a Flintstone-esque lathe or machine assembly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083008</id>
	<title>Who gives a FRACK?</title>
	<author>slasher999</author>
	<datestamp>1258042440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We'll all be LONG DEAD by then! Who cares if it lasts beyond the lifespan of our children? I honestly couldn't care less - so not impressed!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 'll all be LONG DEAD by then !
Who cares if it lasts beyond the lifespan of our children ?
I honestly could n't care less - so not impressed !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We'll all be LONG DEAD by then!
Who cares if it lasts beyond the lifespan of our children?
I honestly couldn't care less - so not impressed!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082970</id>
	<title>Re:1,000 years?</title>
	<author>timmarhy</author>
	<datestamp>1258042020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>maybe it's the disc's your buying. try spending more then a $1 per disc and you'll find they last.</htmltext>
<tokenext>maybe it 's the disc 's your buying .
try spending more then a $ 1 per disc and you 'll find they last .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>maybe it's the disc's your buying.
try spending more then a $1 per disc and you'll find they last.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083424</id>
	<title>Re:will it be shot down?</title>
	<author>jonwil</author>
	<datestamp>1258045920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't for your regular disks (its likely more expensive than most regular disks), its for stuff that needs to be archived for a LONG time, especially stuff being stored in climate controlled location.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't for your regular disks ( its likely more expensive than most regular disks ) , its for stuff that needs to be archived for a LONG time , especially stuff being stored in climate controlled location .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't for your regular disks (its likely more expensive than most regular disks), its for stuff that needs to be archived for a LONG time, especially stuff being stored in climate controlled location.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082910</id>
	<title>Hate these claims: These guys can't lose</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1258041540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What are the odds the company's around to sue if they're wrong in 100 years let alone 1000? I can tell you the odds of the guys who made the claim being around are zero. If you're going to put your faith in this nonsense I have a bridge to sell you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What are the odds the company 's around to sue if they 're wrong in 100 years let alone 1000 ?
I can tell you the odds of the guys who made the claim being around are zero .
If you 're going to put your faith in this nonsense I have a bridge to sell you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What are the odds the company's around to sue if they're wrong in 100 years let alone 1000?
I can tell you the odds of the guys who made the claim being around are zero.
If you're going to put your faith in this nonsense I have a bridge to sell you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30092262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30091738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30088356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30088352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30089912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082864
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30086120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30087492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30091614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30087984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084862
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085362
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30087250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30104708
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30087552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30088138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_019202_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30088876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083012
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30104708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30088356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082854
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30088138
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30087552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083266
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084092
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30087984
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083590
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082788
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085410
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082794
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30092262
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084038
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083428
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085350
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30091738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083092
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083310
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30087492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083038
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083630
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083700
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30088876
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083816
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083488
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084040
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083968
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084940
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084468
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083960
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30087250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082886
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083586
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082848
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083634
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30089912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084004
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083370
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085586
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084048
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085642
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30091614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30088352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084412
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083228
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30084066
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082858
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085432
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083518
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30085362
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_019202.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30082940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30083718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_019202.30086120
</commentlist>
</conversation>
