<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_12_1256234</id>
	<title>Google Under Fire For Calling Their Language "Go"</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1258033140000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Norsefire writes <i>"Since releasing the 'Go' programming language on Tuesday, <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/web\_services/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=221601351">Google has been under fire</a> for using the same name as another programming language that was first publicly documented in 2003. '<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go!\_(programming\_language)">Go!</a>' was created by Francis McCabe and Keith Clark. McCabe published a book about the language in 2007, and he is <a href="http://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=9">not happy</a>. He told InformationWeek in an email: 'I do not have a trademark on my language. It was intended as a somewhat non-commercial language in the tradition of logic programming languages. It is in the tradition of languages like Prolog. In particular, my motivation was bringing some of the discipline of software engineering to logic programming.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Norsefire writes " Since releasing the 'Go ' programming language on Tuesday , Google has been under fire for using the same name as another programming language that was first publicly documented in 2003 .
'Go ! ' was created by Francis McCabe and Keith Clark .
McCabe published a book about the language in 2007 , and he is not happy .
He told InformationWeek in an email : 'I do not have a trademark on my language .
It was intended as a somewhat non-commercial language in the tradition of logic programming languages .
It is in the tradition of languages like Prolog .
In particular , my motivation was bringing some of the discipline of software engineering to logic programming .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Norsefire writes "Since releasing the 'Go' programming language on Tuesday, Google has been under fire for using the same name as another programming language that was first publicly documented in 2003.
'Go!' was created by Francis McCabe and Keith Clark.
McCabe published a book about the language in 2007, and he is not happy.
He told InformationWeek in an email: 'I do not have a trademark on my language.
It was intended as a somewhat non-commercial language in the tradition of logic programming languages.
It is in the tradition of languages like Prolog.
In particular, my motivation was bringing some of the discipline of software engineering to logic programming.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073400</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>theeddie55</author>
	<datestamp>1258044360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goo\_(programming\_language)" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goo\_(programming\_language)</a> [wikipedia.org] goo's already a programming language.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goo \ _ ( programming \ _language ) [ wikipedia.org ] goo 's already a programming language .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goo\_(programming\_language) [wikipedia.org] goo's already a programming language.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073616</id>
	<title>Re:Google should rename Go to Issue 9</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258045380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually another one proposed i9, which I consider a great name in respect to issue 9, plan 9 and the fact that the "language-formally-known-as-go" compiler and linker are named after numbers defining the architecture (5g, 6g, 8g and 5l, 6l, 8l)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually another one proposed i9 , which I consider a great name in respect to issue 9 , plan 9 and the fact that the " language-formally-known-as-go " compiler and linker are named after numbers defining the architecture ( 5g , 6g , 8g and 5l , 6l , 8l )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually another one proposed i9, which I consider a great name in respect to issue 9, plan 9 and the fact that the "language-formally-known-as-go" compiler and linker are named after numbers defining the architecture (5g, 6g, 8g and 5l, 6l, 8l)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072272</id>
	<title>They should change it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258039800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They can call it Goog.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They can call it Goog .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can call it Goog.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073686</id>
	<title>Google could change Go to....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258045740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>G100</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>G100</tokentext>
<sentencetext>G100</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074566</id>
	<title>Go is a bad name anyhow</title>
	<author>wonkavader</author>
	<datestamp>1258049280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you want to get a syntax example for perl, you google for "perl syntax" or "perl printf" or some such.</p><p>If you want info for Go, you type "go syntax" and since the word GO is one of the most common in the English language, you get 14,700,000 hits.</p><p>DUMB NAME.  VERY BAD NAME.</p><p>Google should immediately make lemonade out of lemons and change the name to something like "golang" or "goog" -- everyone will be much happier that they did, and did it reasonably early.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want to get a syntax example for perl , you google for " perl syntax " or " perl printf " or some such.If you want info for Go , you type " go syntax " and since the word GO is one of the most common in the English language , you get 14,700,000 hits.DUMB NAME .
VERY BAD NAME.Google should immediately make lemonade out of lemons and change the name to something like " golang " or " goog " -- everyone will be much happier that they did , and did it reasonably early .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want to get a syntax example for perl, you google for "perl syntax" or "perl printf" or some such.If you want info for Go, you type "go syntax" and since the word GO is one of the most common in the English language, you get 14,700,000 hits.DUMB NAME.
VERY BAD NAME.Google should immediately make lemonade out of lemons and change the name to something like "golang" or "goog" -- everyone will be much happier that they did, and did it reasonably early.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075250</id>
	<title>Door number 3</title>
	<author>SuperBanana</author>
	<datestamp>1258051020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>3)They don't give a damn.  They're PhDs at Google.  Why does anyone else matter?</htmltext>
<tokenext>3 ) They do n't give a damn .
They 're PhDs at Google .
Why does anyone else matter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>3)They don't give a damn.
They're PhDs at Google.
Why does anyone else matter?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076734</id>
	<title>They should name it D'oh!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258055640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30083722</id>
	<title>Why that name anyway?</title>
	<author>aldld</author>
	<datestamp>1258050420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why did they choose Go for a name anyway? Sounds like it would be very hard to search for information about it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did they choose Go for a name anyway ?
Sounds like it would be very hard to search for information about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why did they choose Go for a name anyway?
Sounds like it would be very hard to search for information about it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074492</id>
	<title>Re:Someone is getting fired...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258048920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nobody seems to consider the likelihood that Google DOES know how to search the web (duh!) and therefore are aware that they're taking this man's UNTRADEMARKED name (RTFA).</p><p>They know what they're doing. McCabe's lack of foresight allowed this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody seems to consider the likelihood that Google DOES know how to search the web ( duh !
) and therefore are aware that they 're taking this man 's UNTRADEMARKED name ( RTFA ) .They know what they 're doing .
McCabe 's lack of foresight allowed this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody seems to consider the likelihood that Google DOES know how to search the web (duh!
) and therefore are aware that they're taking this man's UNTRADEMARKED name (RTFA).They know what they're doing.
McCabe's lack of foresight allowed this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073502</id>
	<title>Re:Goo</title>
	<author>Captain Spam</author>
	<datestamp>1258044780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nah, they should just rename it the Reversi programming language.  That shouldn't conflict with anything!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nah , they should just rename it the Reversi programming language .
That should n't conflict with anything !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nah, they should just rename it the Reversi programming language.
That shouldn't conflict with anything!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071920</id>
	<title>Call it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258038060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Call it Goo. Then you can make GUI's with it. GooGUIKit Say that then times fast</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Call it Goo .
Then you can make GUI 's with it .
GooGUIKit Say that then times fast</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Call it Goo.
Then you can make GUI's with it.
GooGUIKit Say that then times fast</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074422</id>
	<title>Rename it to "Stop" or even "Stop!" ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258048620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(which is what I think about Google's language).</p><p>Clark and McCabe's "Go!" is theoretically sound and has a cool syntax, wheras Google's "Go" is not even halfway appealing (at least to me).</p><p>There's enough simplified languages around, for instance Groovy, which is based on Java.</p><p>Almighty Google should rather promote high computing standards instead of increasing their marketshare by introducing another proprietary technique.</p><p>Keroro</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( which is what I think about Google 's language ) .Clark and McCabe 's " Go !
" is theoretically sound and has a cool syntax , wheras Google 's " Go " is not even halfway appealing ( at least to me ) .There 's enough simplified languages around , for instance Groovy , which is based on Java.Almighty Google should rather promote high computing standards instead of increasing their marketshare by introducing another proprietary technique.Keroro</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(which is what I think about Google's language).Clark and McCabe's "Go!
" is theoretically sound and has a cool syntax, wheras Google's "Go" is not even halfway appealing (at least to me).There's enough simplified languages around, for instance Groovy, which is based on Java.Almighty Google should rather promote high computing standards instead of increasing their marketshare by introducing another proprietary technique.Keroro</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078772</id>
	<title>Re:"Under fire"?</title>
	<author>shaitand</author>
	<datestamp>1258019880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since the media picked up on his LEGITIMATE complaint and big corp is now being tried in the media.</p><p>Of course Google knew about this, the guy contacted them repeatedly. They might even have done it for the free press.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the media picked up on his LEGITIMATE complaint and big corp is now being tried in the media.Of course Google knew about this , the guy contacted them repeatedly .
They might even have done it for the free press .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the media picked up on his LEGITIMATE complaint and big corp is now being tried in the media.Of course Google knew about this, the guy contacted them repeatedly.
They might even have done it for the free press.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075508</id>
	<title>Easy fixed....</title>
	<author>nighty5</author>
	<datestamp>1258051680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Go++</htmltext>
<tokenext>Go + +</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go++</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30080634</id>
	<title>Re:not an issue</title>
	<author>Bat Country</author>
	<datestamp>1258026420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's an issue there though - C# is loosely derived from C.  Go! is not derived from Go.  It's a terrible idea for Google to keep the name if for no other reason than simply confusing users.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's an issue there though - C # is loosely derived from C. Go ! is not derived from Go .
It 's a terrible idea for Google to keep the name if for no other reason than simply confusing users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's an issue there though - C# is loosely derived from C.  Go! is not derived from Go.
It's a terrible idea for Google to keep the name if for no other reason than simply confusing users.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072908</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258042500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While it was introduced to the West through Japan, the boardgame go originated from China.  And to be frank, the comparison to Chess is loose at best.  It's closer to Othello/Reversi, if anything.  Had you not mentioned the word "Go" or known the context, I would have thought by "Japanese chess game" you meant Shogi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While it was introduced to the West through Japan , the boardgame go originated from China .
And to be frank , the comparison to Chess is loose at best .
It 's closer to Othello/Reversi , if anything .
Had you not mentioned the word " Go " or known the context , I would have thought by " Japanese chess game " you meant Shogi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While it was introduced to the West through Japan, the boardgame go originated from China.
And to be frank, the comparison to Chess is loose at best.
It's closer to Othello/Reversi, if anything.
Had you not mentioned the word "Go" or known the context, I would have thought by "Japanese chess game" you meant Shogi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072120</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258039140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People will search on "go", not "go"bang. Google will change their language's name soon enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People will search on " go " , not " go " bang .
Google will change their language 's name soon enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People will search on "go", not "go"bang.
Google will change their language's name soon enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078716</id>
	<title>Re:Tingo?</title>
	<author>krakraille</author>
	<datestamp>1258019640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Recursive acronym attempt: GoING for Go Is Not Go?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Recursive acronym attempt : GoING for Go Is Not Go ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Recursive acronym attempt: GoING for Go Is Not Go?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073276</id>
	<title>Speaking of Igo...</title>
	<author>Myrcutio</author>
	<datestamp>1258043880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>now that ya mention go--which is weiqi in chinese, where the game originated--it is interesting to note that the game holds a special place in computer science as a benchmark for AI testing.  See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer\_Go" title="wikipedia.org">here</a> [wikipedia.org]. I can't remember where i read it but someone once said there are more possible board positions than there are stars in the known universe, which makes programming for the game entirely dependent on how well the program can evaluate positions.<br> <br>

I'd really be interested to see if google's language can utilize CUDA to analyze hundreds of board positions at a time, or if it can implement google search-like pattern recognition to find groupings of favorable board positions.  Name aside, what does the language bring new to the table?</htmltext>
<tokenext>now that ya mention go--which is weiqi in chinese , where the game originated--it is interesting to note that the game holds a special place in computer science as a benchmark for AI testing .
See here [ wikipedia.org ] .
I ca n't remember where i read it but someone once said there are more possible board positions than there are stars in the known universe , which makes programming for the game entirely dependent on how well the program can evaluate positions .
I 'd really be interested to see if google 's language can utilize CUDA to analyze hundreds of board positions at a time , or if it can implement google search-like pattern recognition to find groupings of favorable board positions .
Name aside , what does the language bring new to the table ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>now that ya mention go--which is weiqi in chinese, where the game originated--it is interesting to note that the game holds a special place in computer science as a benchmark for AI testing.
See here [wikipedia.org].
I can't remember where i read it but someone once said there are more possible board positions than there are stars in the known universe, which makes programming for the game entirely dependent on how well the program can evaluate positions.
I'd really be interested to see if google's language can utilize CUDA to analyze hundreds of board positions at a time, or if it can implement google search-like pattern recognition to find groupings of favorable board positions.
Name aside, what does the language bring new to the table?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30082208</id>
	<title>call it go</title>
	<author>moondo</author>
	<datestamp>1258035180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That guy should be happy Google took the name he used for his obsolete language and just let it go at that. All his crying and whining is pathetic. He didn't make a copyright for it, why is he being such a little baby about it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That guy should be happy Google took the name he used for his obsolete language and just let it go at that .
All his crying and whining is pathetic .
He did n't make a copyright for it , why is he being such a little baby about it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That guy should be happy Google took the name he used for his obsolete language and just let it go at that.
All his crying and whining is pathetic.
He didn't make a copyright for it, why is he being such a little baby about it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30081860</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>david duncan scott</author>
	<datestamp>1258032780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Like a check for $000,000.00?
<p>Actually, I'd like a check like that from Google. I'd hang it on my wall.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like a check for $ 000,000.00 ?
Actually , I 'd like a check like that from Google .
I 'd hang it on my wall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like a check for $000,000.00?
Actually, I'd like a check like that from Google.
I'd hang it on my wall.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30080472</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1258025760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about Gool?</p><p>Google Object Oriented Language?</p><p>Meh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about Gool ? Google Object Oriented Language ? Meh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about Gool?Google Object Oriented Language?Meh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077902</id>
	<title>Re:Beyond that, 'Go' is not google unique</title>
	<author>CrashNBrn</author>
	<datestamp>1258016520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or, Results 1 - 10 of about <b>53,900</b> for <i>NET Framework string concatenation</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , Results 1 - 10 of about 53,900 for NET Framework string concatenation</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, Results 1 - 10 of about 53,900 for NET Framework string concatenation</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073308</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>kumanopuusan</author>
	<datestamp>1258044000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Go originated in China, but is played in Japan.
TFA is about naming things Go, so it might be worthwhile to note that Go is the Japanese name for the game.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Go originated in China , but is played in Japan .
TFA is about naming things Go , so it might be worthwhile to note that Go is the Japanese name for the game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go originated in China, but is played in Japan.
TFA is about naming things Go, so it might be worthwhile to note that Go is the Japanese name for the game.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077258</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>malakai</author>
	<datestamp>1258057440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He published in "Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence" and it's <a href="http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=998367" title="acm.org"> cited</a> [acm.org] in the ACM portal. Who cares what Wiki has or doesn't have.</p><p>This wasn't some geocities page with talk about a language that was never developed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He published in " Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence " and it 's cited [ acm.org ] in the ACM portal .
Who cares what Wiki has or does n't have.This was n't some geocities page with talk about a language that was never developed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He published in "Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence" and it's  cited [acm.org] in the ACM portal.
Who cares what Wiki has or doesn't have.This wasn't some geocities page with talk about a language that was never developed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072426</id>
	<title>Re:Someone is getting fired...</title>
	<author>jellomizer</author>
	<datestamp>1258040460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would hate to have you as a boss.<br>Oh you had a bug in you code... YOUR FIRRREED!<br>Oh you tried to come up with a creative name that was taken by some obscure language... YOUR FIRRREED!<br>When brain storming for ideas in the meeting you idea that we all liked had a problem... YOUR FIRREED!</p><p>I bet you work for the government or something.  People make mistakes.  Googling for GO will lead to a lot of results and people know that and Go is used for a lot of help support too. So they probably realized it is such a common word finding a language like it will be like a needle in a haystack.<br>Sure google searches now will probably bring you better results however now that it is news it would effect the Google search criteria.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would hate to have you as a boss.Oh you had a bug in you code... YOUR FIRRREED ! Oh you tried to come up with a creative name that was taken by some obscure language... YOUR FIRRREED ! When brain storming for ideas in the meeting you idea that we all liked had a problem... YOUR FIRREED ! I bet you work for the government or something .
People make mistakes .
Googling for GO will lead to a lot of results and people know that and Go is used for a lot of help support too .
So they probably realized it is such a common word finding a language like it will be like a needle in a haystack.Sure google searches now will probably bring you better results however now that it is news it would effect the Google search criteria .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would hate to have you as a boss.Oh you had a bug in you code... YOUR FIRRREED!Oh you tried to come up with a creative name that was taken by some obscure language... YOUR FIRRREED!When brain storming for ideas in the meeting you idea that we all liked had a problem... YOUR FIRREED!I bet you work for the government or something.
People make mistakes.
Googling for GO will lead to a lot of results and people know that and Go is used for a lot of help support too.
So they probably realized it is such a common word finding a language like it will be like a needle in a haystack.Sure google searches now will probably bring you better results however now that it is news it would effect the Google search criteria.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074060</id>
	<title>Blessed Are the Peacemakers</title>
	<author>flyneye</author>
	<datestamp>1258047480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>       If I might be so bold as to suggest a rename of Googles endeavors to " Goog". This still remains catchy and could become a verb for coding in this language just as "to Google" is to search with the corresponding engine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I might be so bold as to suggest a rename of Googles endeavors to " Goog " .
This still remains catchy and could become a verb for coding in this language just as " to Google " is to search with the corresponding engine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>       If I might be so bold as to suggest a rename of Googles endeavors to " Goog".
This still remains catchy and could become a verb for coding in this language just as "to Google" is to search with the corresponding engine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072504</id>
	<title>UUIDs</title>
	<author>ewg</author>
	<datestamp>1258040760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is why I name all my programming languages by UUID.

In fact, look for my new book, <em>Ed68c886-6390-4255-813f-48e61f6b0b06: The Definitive Guide</em> to be published in the second quarter of next year!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why I name all my programming languages by UUID .
In fact , look for my new book , Ed68c886-6390-4255-813f-48e61f6b0b06 : The Definitive Guide to be published in the second quarter of next year !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why I name all my programming languages by UUID.
In fact, look for my new book, Ed68c886-6390-4255-813f-48e61f6b0b06: The Definitive Guide to be published in the second quarter of next year!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072482</id>
	<title>Plan 9&#189;</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1258040640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given who's involved, they coulda called it 9&#189;, or maybe stepped past Inferno and called it Paradisio.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given who 's involved , they coulda called it 9   , or maybe stepped past Inferno and called it Paradisio .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given who's involved, they coulda called it 9½, or maybe stepped past Inferno and called it Paradisio.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30080002</id>
	<title>Re:Someone is getting fired...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258023960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would hate to have you as a boss. Anyone who can't spell you're is an idiot... IDIOT!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would hate to have you as a boss .
Anyone who ca n't spell you 're is an idiot... IDIOT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would hate to have you as a boss.
Anyone who can't spell you're is an idiot... IDIOT!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078826</id>
	<title>Re:Google should rename Go to Issue 9</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258020000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should rename it to <b>GoTo</b>.<br>That will make the language very appealing to all new computer professionals.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should rename it to GoTo.That will make the language very appealing to all new computer professionals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should rename it to GoTo.That will make the language very appealing to all new computer professionals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075460</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Iron Condor</author>
	<datestamp>1258051620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Might as well just name his next programming language "AND" or "IS" so he can whine about people talking, period.</p></div><p>There is already a language named <a href="http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Category:Brainf***" title="rosettacode.org">Brainfuck</a> [rosettacode.org], so we can already whine about people posting on slashdot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Might as well just name his next programming language " AND " or " IS " so he can whine about people talking , period.There is already a language named Brainfuck [ rosettacode.org ] , so we can already whine about people posting on slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Might as well just name his next programming language "AND" or "IS" so he can whine about people talking, period.There is already a language named Brainfuck [rosettacode.org], so we can already whine about people posting on slashdot.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076010</id>
	<title>Re:Google should rename Go to Issue 9</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258053360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It should be Issue 9 From Outer Space. It is a bastard child of Plan9 after all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It should be Issue 9 From Outer Space .
It is a bastard child of Plan9 after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It should be Issue 9 From Outer Space.
It is a bastard child of Plan9 after all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076308</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1258054260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In what way is "Go!" a "hobby language" and "Go" isn't?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In what way is " Go !
" a " hobby language " and " Go " is n't ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In what way is "Go!
" a "hobby language" and "Go" isn't?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072076</id>
	<title>They should add monads</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258038900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they only added <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monad\_(functional\_programming)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">monads</a> [wikipedia.org] to their language, they could call it Gonads!</p><p>dom</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they only added monads [ wikipedia.org ] to their language , they could call it Gonads ! dom</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they only added monads [wikipedia.org] to their language, they could call it Gonads!dom</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072652</id>
	<title>Re:Google should rename Go to Issue 9</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258041420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I created a programming language as part of my Masters program, and it's called Issue9.</p><p>Sorry, that's too close to mine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I created a programming language as part of my Masters program , and it 's called Issue9.Sorry , that 's too close to mine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I created a programming language as part of my Masters program, and it's called Issue9.Sorry, that's too close to mine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072820</id>
	<title>Goscript...</title>
	<author>Urban Garlic</author>
	<datestamp>1258042140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So Google can change theirs to "Goscript", and gain the clarity of the Java/Javascript situation.  And nobody will confuse it with ghostscript.  It's perfect!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So Google can change theirs to " Goscript " , and gain the clarity of the Java/Javascript situation .
And nobody will confuse it with ghostscript .
It 's perfect !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Google can change theirs to "Goscript", and gain the clarity of the Java/Javascript situation.
And nobody will confuse it with ghostscript.
It's perfect!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074192</id>
	<title>Teach the controversy!</title>
	<author>0xdeadbeef</author>
	<datestamp>1258047960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like how the Wikipedia article was created yesterday. It is now notable for Google having never heard of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like how the Wikipedia article was created yesterday .
It is now notable for Google having never heard of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like how the Wikipedia article was created yesterday.
It is now notable for Google having never heard of it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073668</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>barocco</author>
	<datestamp>1258045620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's actually a Chinese game if you are talking about where it came from.<br>
<br>
There seems to be something in the word "Go" that confuses people about its origin no matter what the context (3 scenarios in your post). Next experiment: try first-post with "Go" and see if the universe explodes<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's actually a Chinese game if you are talking about where it came from .
There seems to be something in the word " Go " that confuses people about its origin no matter what the context ( 3 scenarios in your post ) .
Next experiment : try first-post with " Go " and see if the universe explodes : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's actually a Chinese game if you are talking about where it came from.
There seems to be something in the word "Go" that confuses people about its origin no matter what the context (3 scenarios in your post).
Next experiment: try first-post with "Go" and see if the universe explodes :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073148</id>
	<title>Re:Goop?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258043400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I prefer GooG</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer GooG</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer GooG</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072062</id>
	<title>I always thought 'Go' was totally owned by Moby</title>
	<author>Tomsk70</author>
	<datestamp>1258038840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(or maybe that's just my age showing)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( or maybe that 's just my age showing )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(or maybe that's just my age showing)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073916</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>lymond01</author>
	<datestamp>1258046880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Either I couldn't find the rhythm in the poem or, like many a high school Shakespearean play, I'm going to need the translation on the opposing page.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Either I could n't find the rhythm in the poem or , like many a high school Shakespearean play , I 'm going to need the translation on the opposing page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Either I couldn't find the rhythm in the poem or, like many a high school Shakespearean play, I'm going to need the translation on the opposing page.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071880</id>
	<title>Re:So?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258037880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some things are ethically questionable even when there is no legal problem involved. A concept often forgotten in the corporate world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some things are ethically questionable even when there is no legal problem involved .
A concept often forgotten in the corporate world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some things are ethically questionable even when there is no legal problem involved.
A concept often forgotten in the corporate world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072072</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258038840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Google's language is called Go! (with an exclamation mark.) The  preexisting language whose existence has been suddenly and rudely revealed is called Go without the exclamation mark.</p> </div><p>It appears you have Got! things round the wrong way.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google 's language is called Go !
( with an exclamation mark .
) The preexisting language whose existence has been suddenly and rudely revealed is called Go without the exclamation mark .
It appears you have Got !
things round the wrong way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google's language is called Go!
(with an exclamation mark.
) The  preexisting language whose existence has been suddenly and rudely revealed is called Go without the exclamation mark.
It appears you have Got!
things round the wrong way.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072278</id>
	<title>Slashdot needs a voting mecahnism for this</title>
	<author>MarkWatson</author>
	<datestamp>1258039800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A poll would be interesting.</p><p>Personally, I think that "Go and "Go! are two different names, so there is no problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A poll would be interesting.Personally , I think that " Go and " Go !
are two different names , so there is no problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A poll would be interesting.Personally, I think that "Go and "Go!
are two different names, so there is no problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074808</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>STRICQ</author>
	<datestamp>1258049940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is already a language named 'false'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is already a language named 'false' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is already a language named 'false'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072768</id>
	<title>Tingo?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258041960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>T</b>his <b>I</b>s <b>N</b>ot <b>GO</b>.<br>It apparently also means "To take all the objects one desires from the house of a friend, one at a time, by borrowing them." in Pasquense, Easter Island.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This Is Not GO.It apparently also means " To take all the objects one desires from the house of a friend , one at a time , by borrowing them .
" in Pasquense , Easter Island .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This Is Not GO.It apparently also means "To take all the objects one desires from the house of a friend, one at a time, by borrowing them.
" in Pasquense, Easter Island.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30079274</id>
	<title>Re:Someone is getting fired...</title>
	<author>vikstar</author>
	<datestamp>1258021680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why does everyone think that this was a mistake? My money is that Google knew full well that the language Go! existed, and they probably even had someone on their team learn it and evaluate it. The people that invented the Google Go language are programming language experts themselves, and I have no doubt they knew about the Go! language. Especially since it was published in a journal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does everyone think that this was a mistake ?
My money is that Google knew full well that the language Go !
existed , and they probably even had someone on their team learn it and evaluate it .
The people that invented the Google Go language are programming language experts themselves , and I have no doubt they knew about the Go !
language. Especially since it was published in a journal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does everyone think that this was a mistake?
My money is that Google knew full well that the language Go!
existed, and they probably even had someone on their team learn it and evaluate it.
The people that invented the Google Go language are programming language experts themselves, and I have no doubt they knew about the Go!
language. Especially since it was published in a journal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072330</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>khallow</author>
	<datestamp>1258040040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In this case Google should really change the name since its been used in an existing programming language for years.</p></div><p>Why? Go! is just another hobby language that's only been around for a few years. The only thing it has generated is a few academic papers. There probably have been thousands of those in the past 50 or so years. I see no reason for Google to change the name of its computing language just because there are already one or more programming languages with similar names. As the previous sentence implies, I wouldn't be surprised to find out there there are several programming languages with something very similar.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In this case Google should really change the name since its been used in an existing programming language for years.Why ?
Go ! is just another hobby language that 's only been around for a few years .
The only thing it has generated is a few academic papers .
There probably have been thousands of those in the past 50 or so years .
I see no reason for Google to change the name of its computing language just because there are already one or more programming languages with similar names .
As the previous sentence implies , I would n't be surprised to find out there there are several programming languages with something very similar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In this case Google should really change the name since its been used in an existing programming language for years.Why?
Go! is just another hobby language that's only been around for a few years.
The only thing it has generated is a few academic papers.
There probably have been thousands of those in the past 50 or so years.
I see no reason for Google to change the name of its computing language just because there are already one or more programming languages with similar names.
As the previous sentence implies, I wouldn't be surprised to find out there there are several programming languages with something very similar.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078676</id>
	<title>Re:Someone is getting fired...</title>
	<author>shaitand</author>
	<datestamp>1258019460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"People make mistakes."</p><p>And companies play the blame game. People who make mistakes (or get blamed for mistakes) that cost the company a bunch of money. Those people get fired.</p><p>In this it isn't the person who selected the name who should be canned though. It is the person who read the half dozen communications from the Go! guy PRIOR to launch and didn't want to expend the effort to rename prior to launch. In reality this decision maker will pass the buck to some low level grunt who fields emails.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" People make mistakes .
" And companies play the blame game .
People who make mistakes ( or get blamed for mistakes ) that cost the company a bunch of money .
Those people get fired.In this it is n't the person who selected the name who should be canned though .
It is the person who read the half dozen communications from the Go !
guy PRIOR to launch and did n't want to expend the effort to rename prior to launch .
In reality this decision maker will pass the buck to some low level grunt who fields emails .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"People make mistakes.
"And companies play the blame game.
People who make mistakes (or get blamed for mistakes) that cost the company a bunch of money.
Those people get fired.In this it isn't the person who selected the name who should be canned though.
It is the person who read the half dozen communications from the Go!
guy PRIOR to launch and didn't want to expend the effort to rename prior to launch.
In reality this decision maker will pass the buck to some low level grunt who fields emails.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30084648</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>CountBrass</author>
	<datestamp>1258107060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How is this post insightful?<br><br>It's just an ill-considered argument in favour of a corporation being able to trample all over the little man. At best it's a glaring example of Google fanboi ranting (which is kind of sad).<br><br>It's not as if there's a shortage of names that Google could pick from. Perhaps they should have used Bing to check on language names before picking Go.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this post insightful ? It 's just an ill-considered argument in favour of a corporation being able to trample all over the little man .
At best it 's a glaring example of Google fanboi ranting ( which is kind of sad ) .It 's not as if there 's a shortage of names that Google could pick from .
Perhaps they should have used Bing to check on language names before picking Go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this post insightful?It's just an ill-considered argument in favour of a corporation being able to trample all over the little man.
At best it's a glaring example of Google fanboi ranting (which is kind of sad).It's not as if there's a shortage of names that Google could pick from.
Perhaps they should have used Bing to check on language names before picking Go.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>wooferhound</author>
	<datestamp>1258038420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think they should rename it to "Goo"</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think they should rename it to " Goo "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think they should rename it to "Goo"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074012</id>
	<title>How come they didnt google "Go" lol</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258047360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kinda silly they didnt google "Go" to see if it was taken/been used in the first place lol</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kinda silly they didnt google " Go " to see if it was taken/been used in the first place lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kinda silly they didnt google "Go" to see if it was taken/been used in the first place lol</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077522</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>eric-x</author>
	<datestamp>1258058460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go is a no go, so they should rename it to Stop.<br>Programmers would be called stoppers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go is a no go , so they should rename it to Stop.Programmers would be called stoppers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go is a no go, so they should rename it to Stop.Programmers would be called stoppers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071836</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258037760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they shoulda just called it 'gog'<br>at least it'd have been different<br>a buzzword capable simply spelt name<br>that only takes 3 characters</p><p>*facepalm*</p><p>-D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they shoulda just called it 'gog'at least it 'd have been differenta buzzword capable simply spelt namethat only takes 3 characters * facepalm * -D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they shoulda just called it 'gog'at least it'd have been differenta buzzword capable simply spelt namethat only takes 3 characters*facepalm*-D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074036</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258047360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks for digging that up. But really, have you or the original author ever... I don't know... heard... a limerick?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for digging that up .
But really , have you or the original author ever... I do n't know... heard... a limerick ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for digging that up.
But really, have you or the original author ever... I don't know... heard... a limerick?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077622</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>robson</author>
	<datestamp>1258058880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Google will send the guy a check with several zeroes in it, relieve their guilty conscience and call it a day. C'mon, you know it will happen that way.</p></div><p>So you're saying the original name for the language was "Goooooo", and they then chopped the five extra o's off and stuck them in the check?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google will send the guy a check with several zeroes in it , relieve their guilty conscience and call it a day .
C'mon , you know it will happen that way.So you 're saying the original name for the language was " Goooooo " , and they then chopped the five extra o 's off and stuck them in the check ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google will send the guy a check with several zeroes in it, relieve their guilty conscience and call it a day.
C'mon, you know it will happen that way.So you're saying the original name for the language was "Goooooo", and they then chopped the five extra o's off and stuck them in the check?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30083556</id>
	<title>Re:Someone is getting fired...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258047720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Oh you tried to come up with a creative name</p></div><p> Well if I was *your* boss I'd fire you for thinking "Go" was creative.  What's next?<br>"Can you come up with a creative idea for a meal?"<br>"Sure - I call it the Sandwich.  Pretty creative, huh?"</p><p>And if people know that "Go" leads to a lot of results, that would imply it's a bad name to use.  You want something a bit more unique.  The kind of person who thinks a generic is a good name for something specific is the same kind of person who thought naming a train company "One" was a good idea.  As in "The One train is on platform 2"...</p><p>Oh, and finally, if I was *your* boss I might ask you to pick up a dictionary and look up the definitions of "affect" and "effect".</p><p>Toodle doo!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh you tried to come up with a creative name Well if I was * your * boss I 'd fire you for thinking " Go " was creative .
What 's next ?
" Can you come up with a creative idea for a meal ?
" " Sure - I call it the Sandwich .
Pretty creative , huh ?
" And if people know that " Go " leads to a lot of results , that would imply it 's a bad name to use .
You want something a bit more unique .
The kind of person who thinks a generic is a good name for something specific is the same kind of person who thought naming a train company " One " was a good idea .
As in " The One train is on platform 2 " ...Oh , and finally , if I was * your * boss I might ask you to pick up a dictionary and look up the definitions of " affect " and " effect " .Toodle doo !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh you tried to come up with a creative name Well if I was *your* boss I'd fire you for thinking "Go" was creative.
What's next?
"Can you come up with a creative idea for a meal?
""Sure - I call it the Sandwich.
Pretty creative, huh?
"And if people know that "Go" leads to a lot of results, that would imply it's a bad name to use.
You want something a bit more unique.
The kind of person who thinks a generic is a good name for something specific is the same kind of person who thought naming a train company "One" was a good idea.
As in "The One train is on platform 2"...Oh, and finally, if I was *your* boss I might ask you to pick up a dictionary and look up the definitions of "affect" and "effect".Toodle doo!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073244</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>Permutation Citizen</author>
	<datestamp>1258043760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Dont get me started on the Japanese chess game Go.</p></div><p>Go is not Japanese only. It originally comes from China and is popular in all east-asia, well in all world now.</p><p>It is not a chess-like game. Go is way older than chess.</p><p>There is a "japanese chess", very popular game in japan, named Shogi.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dont get me started on the Japanese chess game Go.Go is not Japanese only .
It originally comes from China and is popular in all east-asia , well in all world now.It is not a chess-like game .
Go is way older than chess.There is a " japanese chess " , very popular game in japan , named Shogi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dont get me started on the Japanese chess game Go.Go is not Japanese only.
It originally comes from China and is popular in all east-asia, well in all world now.It is not a chess-like game.
Go is way older than chess.There is a "japanese chess", very popular game in japan, named Shogi.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072192</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>fgb</author>
	<datestamp>1258039500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought it was pronounced Go Factorial since after "Hello World", the second program written in a new language is usually a factorial calculator.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it was pronounced Go Factorial since after " Hello World " , the second program written in a new language is usually a factorial calculator .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it was pronounced Go Factorial since after "Hello World", the second program written in a new language is usually a factorial calculator.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752</id>
	<title>Someone is getting fired...</title>
	<author>woolio</author>
	<datestamp>1258037340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet someone at Google will get fired soon...</p><p>Either 1 of 2 things may have happened:</p><p>1) They used Microsoft Bing to search for potential trademark violations<br>2) They were too lazy and didn't check at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet someone at Google will get fired soon...Either 1 of 2 things may have happened : 1 ) They used Microsoft Bing to search for potential trademark violations2 ) They were too lazy and did n't check at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet someone at Google will get fired soon...Either 1 of 2 things may have happened:1) They used Microsoft Bing to search for potential trademark violations2) They were too lazy and didn't check at all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30080370</id>
	<title>Programming in Go?</title>
	<author>Tired and Emotional</author>
	<datestamp>1258025400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if they managed to use just black and white stones or whether they have a (countable?) infinity of colors of stones.
<p>
Presumably its a co-ordination language and data flows between stones down and to the right. Perhaps Black and white might just represent arity and what a stone actually did might not be denoted by color. You would have monadic stones (white?) and dyadic stones (black?) and the syntax would require that monadic stones have at most one stone above or to the left since they can only accept one input at a time.
</p><p>
Either that or the language would be weakly typed and data arriving from above or from the left would be processed separately.
</p><p>
The board would have a left and a top which would accept inputs from the environment but could extend infinitely to to bottom and right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if they managed to use just black and white stones or whether they have a ( countable ?
) infinity of colors of stones .
Presumably its a co-ordination language and data flows between stones down and to the right .
Perhaps Black and white might just represent arity and what a stone actually did might not be denoted by color .
You would have monadic stones ( white ?
) and dyadic stones ( black ?
) and the syntax would require that monadic stones have at most one stone above or to the left since they can only accept one input at a time .
Either that or the language would be weakly typed and data arriving from above or from the left would be processed separately .
The board would have a left and a top which would accept inputs from the environment but could extend infinitely to to bottom and right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if they managed to use just black and white stones or whether they have a (countable?
) infinity of colors of stones.
Presumably its a co-ordination language and data flows between stones down and to the right.
Perhaps Black and white might just represent arity and what a stone actually did might not be denoted by color.
You would have monadic stones (white?
) and dyadic stones (black?
) and the syntax would require that monadic stones have at most one stone above or to the left since they can only accept one input at a time.
Either that or the language would be weakly typed and data arriving from above or from the left would be processed separately.
The board would have a left and a top which would accept inputs from the environment but could extend infinitely to to bottom and right.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072478</id>
	<title>This just in...</title>
	<author>Shabazz Rabbinowitz</author>
	<datestamp>1258040640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They've renamed it Go?</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've renamed it Go ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've renamed it Go?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078538</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>ninkendo84</author>
	<datestamp>1258018980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There once was a man from Japan<br>Whose limericks just wouldn't scan.<br>When asked why this was,<br>he said "It's because,<br>I always try to fit as many syllables onto the last line as I possibly can."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There once was a man from JapanWhose limericks just would n't scan.When asked why this was,he said " It 's because,I always try to fit as many syllables onto the last line as I possibly can .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There once was a man from JapanWhose limericks just wouldn't scan.When asked why this was,he said "It's because,I always try to fit as many syllables onto the last line as I possibly can.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074758</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>STRICQ</author>
	<datestamp>1258049760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They should call it:

0xG0</htmltext>
<tokenext>They should call it : 0xG0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should call it:

0xG0</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30084818</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258109520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What you are really saying is: Google has a lot of money, this guy not. Fuck that guy, let's be evil!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What you are really saying is : Google has a lot of money , this guy not .
Fuck that guy , let 's be evil !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What you are really saying is: Google has a lot of money, this guy not.
Fuck that guy, let's be evil!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071762</id>
	<title>time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258037340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>to call a stop.  Or a stop!</htmltext>
<tokenext>to call a stop .
Or a stop !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to call a stop.
Or a stop!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072634</id>
	<title>Beyond that, 'Go' is not google unique</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258041360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is wrong with people who name new computer languages?  Like it or not, google has become a defacto reference for coders.  You can't remember the exact syntax of python string concatenation, Google it and see:</p><p>Results 1 - 10 of about 21,200 for python "string concatenation". (0.20 seconds)</p><p>And the relevant examples are bunched near the top of the first page.  Now try the same for Go:<br>Results 1 - 10 of about 50,000 for Go "string concatenation". (0.20 seconds)<br>Of course none of them are relevant but you can see that Go coders are going to have a much worse Signal/Noise ratio.</p><p>The only thing I don't like about the processing language is its name:<br>
&nbsp; Results 1 - 10 of about 45,900 for processing "string concatenation". (0.24 seconds)</p><p>Of course it come from a long history of google silly names like 'C'<br>Results 1 - 10 of about 84,300 for C "string concatenation". (0.09 seconds)</p><p>Microsoft wasn't very smart here:<br>Results 1 - 10 of about 157,000 for<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.net "string concatenation". (0.30 seconds)</p><p>Sun was better<br>Results 1 - 10 of about 70,600 for Java "string concatenation". (0.19 seconds)</p><p>Now we're talking:<br>
&nbsp; Results 1 - 10 of about 7,050 for fortran "string concatenation".<br>
&nbsp; Results 1 - 10 of about 3,230 for cobol "string concatenation".</p><p>Of course those last two are much less popular languages but the S/N ratio of the pages you get when you search google for that is very high.</p><p>Google should have a naming contest for their new language.  Come up with something unique like zarking00g</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is wrong with people who name new computer languages ?
Like it or not , google has become a defacto reference for coders .
You ca n't remember the exact syntax of python string concatenation , Google it and see : Results 1 - 10 of about 21,200 for python " string concatenation " .
( 0.20 seconds ) And the relevant examples are bunched near the top of the first page .
Now try the same for Go : Results 1 - 10 of about 50,000 for Go " string concatenation " .
( 0.20 seconds ) Of course none of them are relevant but you can see that Go coders are going to have a much worse Signal/Noise ratio.The only thing I do n't like about the processing language is its name :   Results 1 - 10 of about 45,900 for processing " string concatenation " .
( 0.24 seconds ) Of course it come from a long history of google silly names like 'C'Results 1 - 10 of about 84,300 for C " string concatenation " .
( 0.09 seconds ) Microsoft was n't very smart here : Results 1 - 10 of about 157,000 for .net " string concatenation " .
( 0.30 seconds ) Sun was betterResults 1 - 10 of about 70,600 for Java " string concatenation " .
( 0.19 seconds ) Now we 're talking :   Results 1 - 10 of about 7,050 for fortran " string concatenation " .
  Results 1 - 10 of about 3,230 for cobol " string concatenation " .Of course those last two are much less popular languages but the S/N ratio of the pages you get when you search google for that is very high.Google should have a naming contest for their new language .
Come up with something unique like zarking00g</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is wrong with people who name new computer languages?
Like it or not, google has become a defacto reference for coders.
You can't remember the exact syntax of python string concatenation, Google it and see:Results 1 - 10 of about 21,200 for python "string concatenation".
(0.20 seconds)And the relevant examples are bunched near the top of the first page.
Now try the same for Go:Results 1 - 10 of about 50,000 for Go "string concatenation".
(0.20 seconds)Of course none of them are relevant but you can see that Go coders are going to have a much worse Signal/Noise ratio.The only thing I don't like about the processing language is its name:
  Results 1 - 10 of about 45,900 for processing "string concatenation".
(0.24 seconds)Of course it come from a long history of google silly names like 'C'Results 1 - 10 of about 84,300 for C "string concatenation".
(0.09 seconds)Microsoft wasn't very smart here:Results 1 - 10 of about 157,000 for .net "string concatenation".
(0.30 seconds)Sun was betterResults 1 - 10 of about 70,600 for Java "string concatenation".
(0.19 seconds)Now we're talking:
  Results 1 - 10 of about 7,050 for fortran "string concatenation".
  Results 1 - 10 of about 3,230 for cobol "string concatenation".Of course those last two are much less popular languages but the S/N ratio of the pages you get when you search google for that is very high.Google should have a naming contest for their new language.
Come up with something unique like zarking00g</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073022</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>nmg196</author>
	<datestamp>1258042920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Google's language is called Go! (with an exclamation mark.)</p><p>-1, Wrong<br><a href="http://golang.org/" title="golang.org">Err, no it's not</a> [golang.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Google 's language is called Go !
( with an exclamation mark .
) -1 , WrongErr , no it 's not [ golang.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Google's language is called Go!
(with an exclamation mark.
)-1, WrongErr, no it's not [golang.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30080646</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>davidbofinger</author>
	<datestamp>1258026420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Go originated in China, but is played in Japan.</p></div><p>And the strongest country in the world today is Korea.</p><p>It's also played by geeky people all around the world, of course.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Go originated in China , but is played in Japan.And the strongest country in the world today is Korea.It 's also played by geeky people all around the world , of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go originated in China, but is played in Japan.And the strongest country in the world today is Korea.It's also played by geeky people all around the world, of course.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075822</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258052700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only languages to support COME FROM were INTERCAL, which was a <i>joke</i>, and certain FORTRAN compilers that used an instruction similar to COME FROM for debugging purposes. (You may want to read your Jargon File again.)</p><p>A more plausible pronunciation for Go! would be Go-Bang, not Go-Not. Or perhaps Go-Factorial.</p><p>I think you've broken some kind of record for density of factual inaccuracies in a Slashdot comment about a programming language.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only languages to support COME FROM were INTERCAL , which was a joke , and certain FORTRAN compilers that used an instruction similar to COME FROM for debugging purposes .
( You may want to read your Jargon File again .
) A more plausible pronunciation for Go !
would be Go-Bang , not Go-Not .
Or perhaps Go-Factorial.I think you 've broken some kind of record for density of factual inaccuracies in a Slashdot comment about a programming language .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only languages to support COME FROM were INTERCAL, which was a joke, and certain FORTRAN compilers that used an instruction similar to COME FROM for debugging purposes.
(You may want to read your Jargon File again.
)A more plausible pronunciation for Go!
would be Go-Bang, not Go-Not.
Or perhaps Go-Factorial.I think you've broken some kind of record for density of factual inaccuracies in a Slashdot comment about a programming language.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30080550</id>
	<title>Vote: "GoGo"</title>
	<author>muenalan</author>
	<datestamp>1258026060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Suffix:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.gg (looks anyhow like<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.go)

Slogan: Go go.

Neat: GoGo would cast this name controversy into a name singularity; always reminding us of the great day such a thread hit nearly 400 comments on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Suffix : .gg ( looks anyhow like .go ) Slogan : Go go .
Neat : GoGo would cast this name controversy into a name singularity ; always reminding us of the great day such a thread hit nearly 400 comments on / .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Suffix: .gg (looks anyhow like .go)

Slogan: Go go.
Neat: GoGo would cast this name controversy into a name singularity; always reminding us of the great day such a thread hit nearly 400 comments on /.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30083112</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258043040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go! is not a hobby language, but the product of a research project.  Dr. McCabe has held multiple professional research positions over the years, and, like any member of the research community,  is right to be concerned over the confusion and loss of visibility of his work.  It's not uncommon to find name clashes among minor "niche" languages, particularly those that served primarily as a vehicle for a research project, as the research community can be rather fragmented among various specialties.  Nonetheless, in this day and age, a simple search for "go programming language" would have revealed the previous work, and it would have been appropriate and courteous for Google not to put that work in the shade by linking the name to its own language, particularly given the tremendous buzz that seems to surround everything Google does.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go !
is not a hobby language , but the product of a research project .
Dr. McCabe has held multiple professional research positions over the years , and , like any member of the research community , is right to be concerned over the confusion and loss of visibility of his work .
It 's not uncommon to find name clashes among minor " niche " languages , particularly those that served primarily as a vehicle for a research project , as the research community can be rather fragmented among various specialties .
Nonetheless , in this day and age , a simple search for " go programming language " would have revealed the previous work , and it would have been appropriate and courteous for Google not to put that work in the shade by linking the name to its own language , particularly given the tremendous buzz that seems to surround everything Google does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go!
is not a hobby language, but the product of a research project.
Dr. McCabe has held multiple professional research positions over the years, and, like any member of the research community,  is right to be concerned over the confusion and loss of visibility of his work.
It's not uncommon to find name clashes among minor "niche" languages, particularly those that served primarily as a vehicle for a research project, as the research community can be rather fragmented among various specialties.
Nonetheless, in this day and age, a simple search for "go programming language" would have revealed the previous work, and it would have been appropriate and courteous for Google not to put that work in the shade by linking the name to its own language, particularly given the tremendous buzz that seems to surround everything Google does.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071930</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>EyelessFade</author>
	<datestamp>1258038120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is also a language called Goo</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is also a language called Goo</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is also a language called Goo</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073714</id>
	<title>If Homer Simpson was responsible..</title>
	<author>Mr\_Miagi</author>
	<datestamp>1258045860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Right now he'd be saying "G'oh!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Right now he 'd be saying " G'oh !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right now he'd be saying "G'oh!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072736</id>
	<title>These days all the good names are taken</title>
	<author>derek\_m</author>
	<datestamp>1258041840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Any attempt to find websites relating to or even mentioning this language (or the alleged book on it) yesterday completely failed: in fact the only sign of it was on a bug report against Google's Go complaining over the name.

These days finding a usable name for anything is bordering on impossible, someones 5minute project from years ago thats been long since abandoned can safely be ignored.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any attempt to find websites relating to or even mentioning this language ( or the alleged book on it ) yesterday completely failed : in fact the only sign of it was on a bug report against Google 's Go complaining over the name .
These days finding a usable name for anything is bordering on impossible , someones 5minute project from years ago thats been long since abandoned can safely be ignored .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any attempt to find websites relating to or even mentioning this language (or the alleged book on it) yesterday completely failed: in fact the only sign of it was on a bug report against Google's Go complaining over the name.
These days finding a usable name for anything is bordering on impossible, someones 5minute project from years ago thats been long since abandoned can safely be ignored.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073102</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>fdamstra</author>
	<datestamp>1258043220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Google's language is called Go! (with an exclamation mark.)</p></div><p>So, do we get to pronounce it "Go Bang"?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google 's language is called Go !
( with an exclamation mark .
) So , do we get to pronounce it " Go Bang " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google's language is called Go!
(with an exclamation mark.
)So, do we get to pronounce it "Go Bang"?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075192</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Iron Condor</author>
	<datestamp>1258050900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Don't use a two letter word for the name, there are a rather limited number of combinations.</p></div><p>I've been fond of the T&amp;A language for quite a while now<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't use a two letter word for the name , there are a rather limited number of combinations.I 've been fond of the T&amp;A language for quite a while now .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't use a two letter word for the name, there are a rather limited number of combinations.I've been fond of the T&amp;A language for quite a while now ...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071902</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072668</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Kell Bengal</author>
	<datestamp>1258041540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Burma shave</htmltext>
<tokenext>Burma shave</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Burma shave</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30083528</id>
	<title>Re:They should change it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258047480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gelgoog.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gelgoog .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gelgoog.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076708</id>
	<title>Re:"Under fire"?</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1258055580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That would be a good analogy if goodmanj created something called McDonald's! first.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be a good analogy if goodmanj created something called McDonald 's !
first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be a good analogy if goodmanj created something called McDonald's!
first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075688</id>
	<title>Misquoted</title>
	<author>AlpineR</author>
	<datestamp>1258052280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The motto is not "Do no evil", it's "Don't be evil".  "Do no evil" implies never doing anything that could be construed as wrong - an impossible task unless you resign yourself to just "Do nothing". "Don't be evil" allows you to make mistakes and correct them, or to choose the lesser of two evils.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The motto is not " Do no evil " , it 's " Do n't be evil " .
" Do no evil " implies never doing anything that could be construed as wrong - an impossible task unless you resign yourself to just " Do nothing " .
" Do n't be evil " allows you to make mistakes and correct them , or to choose the lesser of two evils .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The motto is not "Do no evil", it's "Don't be evil".
"Do no evil" implies never doing anything that could be construed as wrong - an impossible task unless you resign yourself to just "Do nothing".
"Don't be evil" allows you to make mistakes and correct them, or to choose the lesser of two evils.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30080848</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258027320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With speed as a concern, like Google, it should be goggle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With speed as a concern , like Google , it should be goggle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With speed as a concern, like Google, it should be goggle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076500</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258054860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just because it is currently a hobby language doesn't mean something popular might be made with it later. That would result in a naming collision for people (which go language?) and a complex legal battle if both products became successful.

</p><p>Here's what would happen if nobody says anything: Google's Go gets popular and now has trademark weight. Go! hobby language gets popular because basement developer makes new popular app. Google sees this as a threat to trademark and is forced to use legal action.

</p><p>Of course, the hobby language Go! could dwindle and produce nothing of value but we don't know that yet. He's actually doing everyone a favor by bringing up this topic right now while both languages don't have much weight to defend. It eliminates the possibility of expensive arguments in the future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just because it is currently a hobby language does n't mean something popular might be made with it later .
That would result in a naming collision for people ( which go language ?
) and a complex legal battle if both products became successful .
Here 's what would happen if nobody says anything : Google 's Go gets popular and now has trademark weight .
Go ! hobby language gets popular because basement developer makes new popular app .
Google sees this as a threat to trademark and is forced to use legal action .
Of course , the hobby language Go !
could dwindle and produce nothing of value but we do n't know that yet .
He 's actually doing everyone a favor by bringing up this topic right now while both languages do n't have much weight to defend .
It eliminates the possibility of expensive arguments in the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just because it is currently a hobby language doesn't mean something popular might be made with it later.
That would result in a naming collision for people (which go language?
) and a complex legal battle if both products became successful.
Here's what would happen if nobody says anything: Google's Go gets popular and now has trademark weight.
Go! hobby language gets popular because basement developer makes new popular app.
Google sees this as a threat to trademark and is forced to use legal action.
Of course, the hobby language Go!
could dwindle and produce nothing of value but we don't know that yet.
He's actually doing everyone a favor by bringing up this topic right now while both languages don't have much weight to defend.
It eliminates the possibility of expensive arguments in the future.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073272</id>
	<title>Re:Someone is getting fired...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258043880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The earlier name Go! isn't trademarked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The earlier name Go !
is n't trademarked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The earlier name Go!
isn't trademarked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072008</id>
	<title>Re:Goo</title>
	<author>the-bobcat</author>
	<datestamp>1258038480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh yes, this will be the beginning of the end. Google Goo. Come next generation of kids it'll have shortened to Googoo and with the different language offsprings there will also be Gaagaa.
Google, holding your hand like the baby you are.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yes , this will be the beginning of the end .
Google Goo .
Come next generation of kids it 'll have shortened to Googoo and with the different language offsprings there will also be Gaagaa .
Google , holding your hand like the baby you are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yes, this will be the beginning of the end.
Google Goo.
Come next generation of kids it'll have shortened to Googoo and with the different language offsprings there will also be Gaagaa.
Google, holding your hand like the baby you are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076112</id>
	<title>GO! is trademarked</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258053600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Frank McCabe DOES have a trade mark...</p><p>Just because he didn't register GO! as a TM with the USPTO, does not mean that there is no mark.  Under common law, the simple use of the GO! mark has created some trademark rights for Frank.  There is more of a burden for Frank to overcome, and there may be some geographical limitations, however.  I would say that since GO! is a non-descriptive, arbitrary name for a programming language, that there is a book and research paper that has wide circulation since at least 2007, and that Google's GO name for a programming language is confusingly similar, that Frank has some ground to defend his GO! mark.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Frank McCabe DOES have a trade mark...Just because he did n't register GO !
as a TM with the USPTO , does not mean that there is no mark .
Under common law , the simple use of the GO !
mark has created some trademark rights for Frank .
There is more of a burden for Frank to overcome , and there may be some geographical limitations , however .
I would say that since GO !
is a non-descriptive , arbitrary name for a programming language , that there is a book and research paper that has wide circulation since at least 2007 , and that Google 's GO name for a programming language is confusingly similar , that Frank has some ground to defend his GO !
mark .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frank McCabe DOES have a trade mark...Just because he didn't register GO!
as a TM with the USPTO, does not mean that there is no mark.
Under common law, the simple use of the GO!
mark has created some trademark rights for Frank.
There is more of a burden for Frank to overcome, and there may be some geographical limitations, however.
I would say that since GO!
is a non-descriptive, arbitrary name for a programming language, that there is a book and research paper that has wide circulation since at least 2007, and that Google's GO name for a programming language is confusingly similar, that Frank has some ground to defend his GO!
mark.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258037100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What are the chances that they change the name?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What are the chances that they change the name ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What are the chances that they change the name?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071804</id>
	<title>Goo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258037580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google should rename it Goo, or if that's taken then Gooo or Goooooooooo...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google should rename it Goo , or if that 's taken then Gooo or Goooooooooo.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google should rename it Goo, or if that's taken then Gooo or Goooooooooo...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073566</id>
	<title>Re:Google simply does not care.</title>
	<author>LandDolphin</author>
	<datestamp>1258045140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They used the name of an unknown, non-trademarked, language.  This is Evil to you?</htmltext>
<tokenext>They used the name of an unknown , non-trademarked , language .
This is Evil to you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They used the name of an unknown, non-trademarked, language.
This is Evil to you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076510</id>
	<title>Here's a few other ideas</title>
	<author>lottameez</author>
	<datestamp>1258054860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Purl<br>
See<br>
SeePlus<br>
Fourtrain</htmltext>
<tokenext>Purl See SeePlus Fourtrain</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Purl
See
SeePlus
Fourtrain</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078912</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>shaitand</author>
	<datestamp>1258020360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Google's language is called Go! (with an exclamation mark.) The preexisting language whose existence has been suddenly and rudely revealed is called Go without the exclamation mark. Since ! is the negation operator, the Google's language is Go (Not)."</p><p>Amusing comment but you illustrate the problem nicely. Google's language is Go, the preexisting language is Go! not the other way around.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Google 's language is called Go !
( with an exclamation mark .
) The preexisting language whose existence has been suddenly and rudely revealed is called Go without the exclamation mark .
Since !
is the negation operator , the Google 's language is Go ( Not ) .
" Amusing comment but you illustrate the problem nicely .
Google 's language is Go , the preexisting language is Go !
not the other way around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Google's language is called Go!
(with an exclamation mark.
) The preexisting language whose existence has been suddenly and rudely revealed is called Go without the exclamation mark.
Since !
is the negation operator, the Google's language is Go (Not).
"Amusing comment but you illustrate the problem nicely.
Google's language is Go, the preexisting language is Go!
not the other way around.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078836</id>
	<title>Re:Tingo?</title>
	<author>m.ducharme</author>
	<datestamp>1258020060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't you mean <b>T</b>ingo <b>I</b>s <b>N</b>ot <b>GO</b>?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't you mean Tingo Is Not GO ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't you mean Tingo Is Not GO?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072570</id>
	<title>I'm Sorry Lord Bravery...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258041120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But you're going to have to change your name.  There's already a Bake Shoppe with that name.</p><p>Lord Smoked Meats and Fishes is available.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But you 're going to have to change your name .
There 's already a Bake Shoppe with that name.Lord Smoked Meats and Fishes is available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But you're going to have to change your name.
There's already a Bake Shoppe with that name.Lord Smoked Meats and Fishes is available.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073848</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmm...</title>
	<author>jipn4</author>
	<datestamp>1258046520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Simply using the name in a commercial capacity is enough to get an unregistered trademark.</i></p><p>You should mark it with the unregistered trademark symbol, "TM"; without that, you'll have a hard time enforcing it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Simply using the name in a commercial capacity is enough to get an unregistered trademark.You should mark it with the unregistered trademark symbol , " TM " ; without that , you 'll have a hard time enforcing it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Simply using the name in a commercial capacity is enough to get an unregistered trademark.You should mark it with the unregistered trademark symbol, "TM"; without that, you'll have a hard time enforcing it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072118</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258039140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>They should call it "Go: Advanced Technology (Second Edition)".</htmltext>
<tokenext>They should call it " Go : Advanced Technology ( Second Edition ) " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should call it "Go: Advanced Technology (Second Edition)".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071836</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074384</id>
	<title>Simple solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258048560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google renames to goog</p><p>Or since they seem to be naming so many things the same, they could simply call it the Chrome Programming Language(TM).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google renames to googOr since they seem to be naming so many things the same , they could simply call it the Chrome Programming Language ( TM ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google renames to googOr since they seem to be naming so many things the same, they could simply call it the Chrome Programming Language(TM).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30079428</id>
	<title>Re:Wikipedia proposes deletion of Go! page</title>
	<author>vikstar</author>
	<datestamp>1258022160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>sources should be secondary sources independent of the subject</p></div><p>This just shows that wikipedia should never be considered a primary reference, it itself states that the content should be pretty much gossip.<br>Or, google is donanting heavily to wikipedia.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>sources should be secondary sources independent of the subjectThis just shows that wikipedia should never be considered a primary reference , it itself states that the content should be pretty much gossip.Or , google is donanting heavily to wikipedia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sources should be secondary sources independent of the subjectThis just shows that wikipedia should never be considered a primary reference, it itself states that the content should be pretty much gossip.Or, google is donanting heavily to wikipedia.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072260</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077422</id>
	<title>Re:Someone is getting fired...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258057980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I bet someone at Google will get fired soon...</p><p>Either 1 of 2 things may have happened:</p><p>1) They used Microsoft Bing to search for potential trademark violations<br>2) They were too lazy and didn't check at all.</p></div><p>3) They were aware of the violation and management told them to use the name anyway.</p><p>But of course, someone will still get fired because you know management isn't going to take the blame.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet someone at Google will get fired soon...Either 1 of 2 things may have happened : 1 ) They used Microsoft Bing to search for potential trademark violations2 ) They were too lazy and did n't check at all.3 ) They were aware of the violation and management told them to use the name anyway.But of course , someone will still get fired because you know management is n't going to take the blame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet someone at Google will get fired soon...Either 1 of 2 things may have happened:1) They used Microsoft Bing to search for potential trademark violations2) They were too lazy and didn't check at all.3) They were aware of the violation and management told them to use the name anyway.But of course, someone will still get fired because you know management isn't going to take the blame.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072250</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258039740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Err, wrong way round. Google language is called "Go" and the existing langage is called "Go!"</p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go!\_\%28programming\_language\%29</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Err , wrong way round .
Google language is called " Go " and the existing langage is called " Go !
" http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go ! \ _ \ % 28programming \ _language \ % 29</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Err, wrong way round.
Google language is called "Go" and the existing langage is called "Go!
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go!\_\%28programming\_language\%29</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30086944</id>
	<title>Re:Beyond that, 'Go' is not google unique</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258128600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Google should have a naming contest for their new language.</p></div><p>Ah yes, The Vegemite Technique: "iCode 2.0"?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google should have a naming contest for their new language.Ah yes , The Vegemite Technique : " iCode 2.0 " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google should have a naming contest for their new language.Ah yes, The Vegemite Technique: "iCode 2.0"?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072740</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Tejin</author>
	<datestamp>1258041840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>Burma Shave</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>Burma Shave</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Burma Shave</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073664</id>
	<title>Re:Goo</title>
	<author>rainhill</author>
	<datestamp>1258045620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nah.. Goo taken. I suggest Goat instead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nah.. Goo taken .
I suggest Goat instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nah.. Goo taken.
I suggest Goat instead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071768</id>
	<title>So?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258037400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>No TM, no copy right? Why is this guy complaining?</htmltext>
<tokenext>No TM , no copy right ?
Why is this guy complaining ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No TM, no copy right?
Why is this guy complaining?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072840</id>
	<title>Shame on Google</title>
	<author>trib4lmaniac</author>
	<datestamp>1258042200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is scandalous! I would expect better from a company with the motto "Don't be evil." Google should make it absolute clear that this new language is <em>not</em> <strong>Go!</strong> </p><p>I propose they rename it to <strong>!Go</strong>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is scandalous !
I would expect better from a company with the motto " Do n't be evil .
" Google should make it absolute clear that this new language is not Go !
I propose they rename it to ! Go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is scandalous!
I would expect better from a company with the motto "Don't be evil.
" Google should make it absolute clear that this new language is not Go!
I propose they rename it to !Go.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072340</id>
	<title>No chance for confusion...</title>
	<author>ByzantineAlex</author>
	<datestamp>1258040100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...since the new "Go" will always be "Go beta". There will be an older "Go" and a newer "Go beta"... Who's confused now ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...since the new " Go " will always be " Go beta " .
There will be an older " Go " and a newer " Go beta " ... Who 's confused now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...since the new "Go" will always be "Go beta".
There will be an older "Go" and a newer "Go beta"... Who's confused now ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072260</id>
	<title>Wikipedia proposes deletion of Go! page</title>
	<author>rkww</author>
	<datestamp>1258039740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern:

    Non notable language. All the sources seem to be papers and a book by the author of the language. Per WP:N, sources should be secondary sources independent of the subject.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
This template was added 2009-11-12 14:22</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern : Non notable language .
All the sources seem to be papers and a book by the author of the language .
Per WP : N , sources should be secondary sources independent of the subject .
This template was added 2009-11-12 14 : 22</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern:

    Non notable language.
All the sources seem to be papers and a book by the author of the language.
Per WP:N, sources should be secondary sources independent of the subject.
This template was added 2009-11-12 14:22
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073674</id>
	<title>Re:'GO' != 'GO!'</title>
	<author>umberto\_soprano</author>
	<datestamp>1258045740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A+ != A# != A#
C != C# (in fairness they are related)
There are several languages refereed to as D
F != F#
L != L#
M != M4</p><p>If you can't tell the difference between to similarly named programming languages perhaps programming isn't for you!</p></div><p>But

C# = Db
F = E#

and moreover

B# = C</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A + ! = A # ! = A # C ! = C # ( in fairness they are related ) There are several languages refereed to as D F ! = F # L ! = L # M ! = M4If you ca n't tell the difference between to similarly named programming languages perhaps programming is n't for you ! But C # = Db F = E # and moreover B # = C</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A+ != A# != A#
C != C# (in fairness they are related)
There are several languages refereed to as D
F != F#
L != L#
M != M4If you can't tell the difference between to similarly named programming languages perhaps programming isn't for you!But

C# = Db
F = E#

and moreover

B# = C
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072618</id>
	<title>'GO' != 'GO!'</title>
	<author>RiotingPacifist</author>
	<datestamp>1258041300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A+ != A# != A#<br>C != C# (in fairness they are related)<br>There are several languages refereed to as D<br>F != F#<br>L != L#<br>M != M4</p><p>If you can't tell the difference between to similarly named programming languages perhaps programming isn't for you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A + ! = A # ! = A # C ! = C # ( in fairness they are related ) There are several languages refereed to as DF ! = F # L ! = L # M ! = M4If you ca n't tell the difference between to similarly named programming languages perhaps programming is n't for you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A+ != A# != A#C != C# (in fairness they are related)There are several languages refereed to as DF != F#L != L#M != M4If you can't tell the difference between to similarly named programming languages perhaps programming isn't for you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073028</id>
	<title>The real problem</title>
	<author>Qwavel</author>
	<datestamp>1258042920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The thing that bugs me about the name is that it is difficult to Google.</p><p>I know you want a cute name, but please give us something more unique that we can search with!</p><p>Same goes for you D!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing that bugs me about the name is that it is difficult to Google.I know you want a cute name , but please give us something more unique that we can search with ! Same goes for you D !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing that bugs me about the name is that it is difficult to Google.I know you want a cute name, but please give us something more unique that we can search with!Same goes for you D!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072216</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>Bluebottel</author>
	<datestamp>1258039560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Chess game"? You have <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go\_(game)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">got to be shitting me</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Chess game " ?
You have got to be shitting me [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Chess game"?
You have got to be shitting me [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072092</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258038960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Opposite! Google's language is called "go", and McCabe's is called "Go!".</p><p>I'm confident the parent was trying to be funny. Mode him "funny", not "interesting". Still, is it too much to expect people to know what the heck they are talking about before they post? Oh what... Slashdot....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Opposite !
Google 's language is called " go " , and McCabe 's is called " Go !
" .I 'm confident the parent was trying to be funny .
Mode him " funny " , not " interesting " .
Still , is it too much to expect people to know what the heck they are talking about before they post ?
Oh what... Slashdot... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Opposite!
Google's language is called "go", and McCabe's is called "Go!
".I'm confident the parent was trying to be funny.
Mode him "funny", not "interesting".
Still, is it too much to expect people to know what the heck they are talking about before they post?
Oh what... Slashdot....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074140</id>
	<title>I cant find the online manual</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1258047780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I tried both googling and binging for the online GO manual so I could analyse its properties. It was probably recently released and hasnt acquired many links yet.  Plus GO is a common junk word.
<br>
I find it ironic that I cant sucessfully use google to find something at google.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried both googling and binging for the online GO manual so I could analyse its properties .
It was probably recently released and hasnt acquired many links yet .
Plus GO is a common junk word .
I find it ironic that I cant sucessfully use google to find something at google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried both googling and binging for the online GO manual so I could analyse its properties.
It was probably recently released and hasnt acquired many links yet.
Plus GO is a common junk word.
I find it ironic that I cant sucessfully use google to find something at google.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072036</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmm...</title>
	<author>Rary</author>
	<datestamp>1258038600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Perhaps Mr. McCabe should have trademarked the name???</p></div><p>Simply <i>using</i> the name in a commercial capacity is enough to get an unregistered trademark. However, the problem is that he is not selling the Go! programming language. If it's not a commercial entity, then trademark doesn't apply.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps Mr. McCabe should have trademarked the name ? ?
? Simply using the name in a commercial capacity is enough to get an unregistered trademark .
However , the problem is that he is not selling the Go !
programming language .
If it 's not a commercial entity , then trademark does n't apply .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps Mr. McCabe should have trademarked the name??
?Simply using the name in a commercial capacity is enough to get an unregistered trademark.
However, the problem is that he is not selling the Go!
programming language.
If it's not a commercial entity, then trademark doesn't apply.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074322</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1258048320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yet another reason to change it; Yahoo! might sue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet another reason to change it ; Yahoo !
might sue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet another reason to change it; Yahoo!
might sue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073580</id>
	<title>Re:UUIDs</title>
	<author>clickety6</author>
	<datestamp>1258045140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bastard! A little research through a few obscure, un-archived computing journals published in the now defunct USSR would have shown you that I wrote the programming language Ed68c886-6390-4255-813f-48e61f6b0b0<b>5</b> over 25 years ago! The cheek of some people!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bastard !
A little research through a few obscure , un-archived computing journals published in the now defunct USSR would have shown you that I wrote the programming language Ed68c886-6390-4255-813f-48e61f6b0b05 over 25 years ago !
The cheek of some people !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bastard!
A little research through a few obscure, un-archived computing journals published in the now defunct USSR would have shown you that I wrote the programming language Ed68c886-6390-4255-813f-48e61f6b0b05 over 25 years ago!
The cheek of some people!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30085132</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>JasterBobaMereel</author>
	<datestamp>1258114560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..Already Taken as well<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..Perhaps Goog?  (Google search says it doesn't exist)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..Already Taken as well .... ..Perhaps Goog ?
( Google search says it does n't exist )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..Already Taken as well .... ..Perhaps Goog?
(Google search says it doesn't exist)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073332</id>
	<title>Lets get back to BASIC</title>
	<author>uncledrax</author>
	<datestamp>1258044060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.. they should call it "GOTO".<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:] (Go Two? get it? har har..)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.. they should call it " GOTO " .
: ] ( Go Two ?
get it ?
har har.. )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. they should call it "GOTO".
:] (Go Two?
get it?
har har..)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072146</id>
	<title>Re:Someone is getting fired...</title>
	<author>Jugalator</author>
	<datestamp>1258039260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fired? Isn't that exaggerating things a little?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fired ?
Is n't that exaggerating things a little ?
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fired?
Isn't that exaggerating things a little?
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073954</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>scuzzlebutt</author>
	<datestamp>1258047000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about they rename it "Go Fuck Yourself, Francis McCabe and Keith Clark!"?

That name might not even be taken yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about they rename it " Go Fuck Yourself , Francis McCabe and Keith Clark ! " ?
That name might not even be taken yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about they rename it "Go Fuck Yourself, Francis McCabe and Keith Clark!"?
That name might not even be taken yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30086212</id>
	<title>GPL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258125180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not just call it G.P.L. (Google Programming Language)? Or have a naming contest.</p><p>[ sarcasm implied ]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not just call it G.P.L .
( Google Programming Language ) ?
Or have a naming contest .
[ sarcasm implied ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not just call it G.P.L.
(Google Programming Language)?
Or have a naming contest.
[ sarcasm implied ]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075974</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258053240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Goo"!  Now that is a perfect name for a Google programming language: gives the sense of malleability and has the begining of their name in it "Goo"gle.  Just change it to this, cut the orginal poster a check for a few hundred and call it a day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Goo " !
Now that is a perfect name for a Google programming language : gives the sense of malleability and has the begining of their name in it " Goo " gle .
Just change it to this , cut the orginal poster a check for a few hundred and call it a day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Goo"!
Now that is a perfect name for a Google programming language: gives the sense of malleability and has the begining of their name in it "Goo"gle.
Just change it to this, cut the orginal poster a check for a few hundred and call it a day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072552</id>
	<title>How about "G"?</title>
	<author>mattwrock</author>
	<datestamp>1258041060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, the hipsters language. Only the cool kids code in G , yo! Dawg, your routines are so tight! Yo, I'm getting debuggy with it!
(sorry, I couldn't help myself)</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , the hipsters language .
Only the cool kids code in G , yo !
Dawg , your routines are so tight !
Yo , I 'm getting debuggy with it !
( sorry , I could n't help myself )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, the hipsters language.
Only the cool kids code in G , yo!
Dawg, your routines are so tight!
Yo, I'm getting debuggy with it!
(sorry, I couldn't help myself)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078328</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>shaitand</author>
	<datestamp>1258018140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"McCabe's mostly sounding like a jackass. "Oh Google stole my name!" COMMON ENGLISH WORD, hello?"</p><p>Then you should have no objection to Google's  next big thing. They are calling it 'C' after the common English letter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" McCabe 's mostly sounding like a jackass .
" Oh Google stole my name !
" COMMON ENGLISH WORD , hello ?
" Then you should have no objection to Google 's next big thing .
They are calling it 'C ' after the common English letter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"McCabe's mostly sounding like a jackass.
"Oh Google stole my name!
" COMMON ENGLISH WORD, hello?
"Then you should have no objection to Google's  next big thing.
They are calling it 'C' after the common English letter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072802</id>
	<title>Re:Someone is getting fired...</title>
	<author>gad\_zuki!</author>
	<datestamp>1258042080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this a joke? Of course Google knew there was another Go. They just didnt care and didnt expect it to get a reaction. Heck, its still a tempest in a teapot. I doubt theyre going to change it because some blogs have picked up on the story.</p><p>No one is getting fired. If anything, someone is getting a promotion for not putting an exclamation mark in the name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this a joke ?
Of course Google knew there was another Go .
They just didnt care and didnt expect it to get a reaction .
Heck , its still a tempest in a teapot .
I doubt theyre going to change it because some blogs have picked up on the story.No one is getting fired .
If anything , someone is getting a promotion for not putting an exclamation mark in the name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this a joke?
Of course Google knew there was another Go.
They just didnt care and didnt expect it to get a reaction.
Heck, its still a tempest in a teapot.
I doubt theyre going to change it because some blogs have picked up on the story.No one is getting fired.
If anything, someone is getting a promotion for not putting an exclamation mark in the name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075466</id>
	<title>Re:Google should rename Go to Issue 9</title>
	<author>0xABADC0DA</author>
	<datestamp>1258051620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why don't they just call it "g".  Then later, others can invent g++ and g# languages.  This won't be gonfusing at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't they just call it " g " .
Then later , others can invent g + + and g # languages .
This wo n't be gonfusing at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't they just call it "g".
Then later, others can invent g++ and g# languages.
This won't be gonfusing at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076274</id>
	<title>GPL: Google programming language</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258054200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Call it GPL (Google Programming Language). This way, people will write GPL software...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Call it GPL ( Google Programming Language ) .
This way , people will write GPL software.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Call it GPL (Google Programming Language).
This way, people will write GPL software...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072722</id>
	<title>Name considered too short</title>
	<author>hendrikboom</author>
	<datestamp>1258041780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The trouble with Go! as a proper name is that it is too short to be distinctive and will therefore be hard to search for.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The trouble with Go !
as a proper name is that it is too short to be distinctive and will therefore be hard to search for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The trouble with Go!
as a proper name is that it is too short to be distinctive and will therefore be hard to search for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076616</id>
	<title>I can't help but think...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258055280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some corporate lawyer is in deep do do.  Hmmm.  Do!  I kind of like that...  Dibs!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some corporate lawyer is in deep do do .
Hmmm. Do !
I kind of like that.. .
Dibs ! ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some corporate lawyer is in deep do do.
Hmmm.  Do!
I kind of like that...
Dibs!!!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072400</id>
	<title>Rename it</title>
	<author>al3</author>
	<datestamp>1258040400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They will have to call it GoToo!</htmltext>
<tokenext>They will have to call it GoToo !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They will have to call it GoToo!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072380</id>
	<title>not an issue</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258040280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One has a bang (!) at the end, while the other doesn't.</p><p>Everybody knows the difference between C and C#</p><p>The claim has no basis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One has a bang ( !
) at the end , while the other does n't.Everybody knows the difference between C and C # The claim has no basis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One has a bang (!
) at the end, while the other doesn't.Everybody knows the difference between C and C#The claim has no basis.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30083214</id>
	<title>go vs go! same as c vs c++ vs c#</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258043940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The language by McCabe is go! which is not the same as Google's go.
If McCabe can argue that Google's go infringes on go!, then
c++ by Stroustroup et al also infringes on Dennis Ritchie's c and they should rename it.
Similary, Microsoft's c# also infringes on c and should rename it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The language by McCabe is go !
which is not the same as Google 's go .
If McCabe can argue that Google 's go infringes on go ! , then c + + by Stroustroup et al also infringes on Dennis Ritchie 's c and they should rename it .
Similary , Microsoft 's c # also infringes on c and should rename it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The language by McCabe is go!
which is not the same as Google's go.
If McCabe can argue that Google's go infringes on go!, then
c++ by Stroustroup et al also infringes on Dennis Ritchie's c and they should rename it.
Similary, Microsoft's c# also infringes on c and should rename it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075238</id>
	<title>Just keep the name</title>
	<author>mr exploiter</author>
	<datestamp>1258050960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We don't need to encourage squattering of things, we have enough of a problem with domain names. The lawmakers already thought of this and if this is legal then it's OK. <p>
For example, if we allow anyone to use up a two letter name for a programming language just by uploading some code or publishing something in the internet, we'll quickly run out of two letter names. Then it'll be 3 letters etc. When a truly important new language is developed it'll be have to be called something not easy to pronounce.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We do n't need to encourage squattering of things , we have enough of a problem with domain names .
The lawmakers already thought of this and if this is legal then it 's OK . For example , if we allow anyone to use up a two letter name for a programming language just by uploading some code or publishing something in the internet , we 'll quickly run out of two letter names .
Then it 'll be 3 letters etc .
When a truly important new language is developed it 'll be have to be called something not easy to pronounce .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We don't need to encourage squattering of things, we have enough of a problem with domain names.
The lawmakers already thought of this and if this is legal then it's OK. 
For example, if we allow anyone to use up a two letter name for a programming language just by uploading some code or publishing something in the internet, we'll quickly run out of two letter names.
Then it'll be 3 letters etc.
When a truly important new language is developed it'll be have to be called something not easy to pronounce.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073780</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Ngarrang</author>
	<datestamp>1258046220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about GPL?  Google Programming Language.  Then GPL code could really be written in GPL code.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about GPL ?
Google Programming Language .
Then GPL code could really be written in GPL code .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about GPL?
Google Programming Language.
Then GPL code could really be written in GPL code.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077166</id>
	<title>Re:Wikipedia proposes deletion of Go! page</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1258057140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which proves the wikipedia author's point, no one gave a fuck until Google used the name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which proves the wikipedia author 's point , no one gave a fuck until Google used the name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which proves the wikipedia author's point, no one gave a fuck until Google used the name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072260</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076750</id>
	<title>Gogo</title>
	<author>Major Byte</author>
	<datestamp>1258055700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Goo might be a good rename, but how about GoGo?  The mascot could be a dusty old Hoho.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Goo might be a good rename , but how about GoGo ?
The mascot could be a dusty old Hoho .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Goo might be a good rename, but how about GoGo?
The mascot could be a dusty old Hoho.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071906</id>
	<title>They should plan better</title>
	<author>Moas</author>
	<datestamp>1258038000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If Francis McCabe wanted to protect his work he had 6 years in which to do it.

Either he's trying to close the barn door after the horses are gone or he's looking to try to get some sales for his book.

They should have planned better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If Francis McCabe wanted to protect his work he had 6 years in which to do it .
Either he 's trying to close the barn door after the horses are gone or he 's looking to try to get some sales for his book .
They should have planned better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Francis McCabe wanted to protect his work he had 6 years in which to do it.
Either he's trying to close the barn door after the horses are gone or he's looking to try to get some sales for his book.
They should have planned better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073748</id>
	<title>Re:Google should rename Go to Issue 9</title>
	<author>bendodge</author>
	<datestamp>1258046040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about Oogle? Everone will think Google when they hear it, and it's memorable enough. And you could even come up with a nice acronym, like Object-Oriented Google LanguagE (disclaimer: I didn't RTA, so I don't even know if it's OO).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about Oogle ?
Everone will think Google when they hear it , and it 's memorable enough .
And you could even come up with a nice acronym , like Object-Oriented Google LanguagE ( disclaimer : I did n't RTA , so I do n't even know if it 's OO ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about Oogle?
Everone will think Google when they hear it, and it's memorable enough.
And you could even come up with a nice acronym, like Object-Oriented Google LanguagE (disclaimer: I didn't RTA, so I don't even know if it's OO).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071960</id>
	<title>So the problem is what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258038240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is the problem?</p><p>Go as the name of a language isn't copyrightable.</p><p>The person who isn't happy hasn't trademarked "go" as a computer language.</p><p>Google isn't saying they'll force him to stop calling his language Go because of their calling their program "go".</p><p>So what's the problem?</p><p>I'm not happy Sam Fox hasn't rubbed her jubblies in my face. Doesn't mean she has to get 'em out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is the problem ? Go as the name of a language is n't copyrightable.The person who is n't happy has n't trademarked " go " as a computer language.Google is n't saying they 'll force him to stop calling his language Go because of their calling their program " go " .So what 's the problem ? I 'm not happy Sam Fox has n't rubbed her jubblies in my face .
Does n't mean she has to get 'em out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is the problem?Go as the name of a language isn't copyrightable.The person who isn't happy hasn't trademarked "go" as a computer language.Google isn't saying they'll force him to stop calling his language Go because of their calling their program "go".So what's the problem?I'm not happy Sam Fox hasn't rubbed her jubblies in my face.
Doesn't mean she has to get 'em out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072266</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258039800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>McCabe's mostly sounding like a jackass.  "Oh Google stole my name!"  COMMON ENGLISH WORD, hello?</p><p>Might as well just name his next programming language "AND" or "IS" so he can whine about people talking, period.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>McCabe 's mostly sounding like a jackass .
" Oh Google stole my name !
" COMMON ENGLISH WORD , hello ? Might as well just name his next programming language " AND " or " IS " so he can whine about people talking , period .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>McCabe's mostly sounding like a jackass.
"Oh Google stole my name!
"  COMMON ENGLISH WORD, hello?Might as well just name his next programming language "AND" or "IS" so he can whine about people talking, period.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072018</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258038540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>McCabe's is "Go!" and Google's is "Go".</p><p>Really though, if someone can't tell the difference between a word with a ! at the end and a word without it then they probably don't care about programming languages anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>McCabe 's is " Go !
" and Google 's is " Go " .Really though , if someone ca n't tell the difference between a word with a !
at the end and a word without it then they probably do n't care about programming languages anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>McCabe's is "Go!
" and Google's is "Go".Really though, if someone can't tell the difference between a word with a !
at the end and a word without it then they probably don't care about programming languages anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072004</id>
	<title>Biggest scandal since Lindows!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258038420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey, the guys who ripped that one off actually ended up <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft\_vs.\_Lindows" title="wikipedia.org">making $20 million</a> [wikipedia.org]. Anyone want to pay me for my new "Pearl" programming language?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , the guys who ripped that one off actually ended up making $ 20 million [ wikipedia.org ] .
Anyone want to pay me for my new " Pearl " programming language ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, the guys who ripped that one off actually ended up making $20 million [wikipedia.org].
Anyone want to pay me for my new "Pearl" programming language?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076798</id>
	<title>Re:Google should rename Go to Issue 9</title>
	<author>OldSoldier</author>
	<datestamp>1258055880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about GONE - GO - Next Edition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about GONE - GO - Next Edition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about GONE - GO - Next Edition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073222</id>
	<title>Should have named it GL...</title>
	<author>thesnide</author>
	<datestamp>1258043700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... As Google Language. And then opensource their development stack, codenamed openGL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... As Google Language .
And then opensource their development stack , codenamed openGL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... As Google Language.
And then opensource their development stack, codenamed openGL.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072198</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258039560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fascinating observation.</p><p>Only one problem. Google's Go is the one without the exclamation mark:<br>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go<br>golang.org</p><p>So uhhh... therefore I should always use gotos?....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fascinating observation.Only one problem .
Google 's Go is the one without the exclamation mark : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gogolang.orgSo uhhh... therefore I should always use gotos ? ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fascinating observation.Only one problem.
Google's Go is the one without the exclamation mark:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gogolang.orgSo uhhh... therefore I should always use gotos?....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072128</id>
	<title>Call it ten duotrigintillion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258039140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Same number of zeroes, more unique name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Same number of zeroes , more unique name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same number of zeroes, more unique name.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076530</id>
	<title>Re:Google simply does not care.</title>
	<author>Requiem18th</author>
	<datestamp>1258054920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After the inventing the Chrome browser (not related to Mozilla's chrome://browser) and the Closure compiler (not related the Clojure compiler) I have some suggestions for original names:</p><p>1) Zool<br>2) Venkman<br>3) Javaskript<br>4) Firebug (you can't tell me there is a Firebug programming language)<br>5) Pie-Ton<br>6) Ruvy<br>7)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com (since MS got away with<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.net)<br>8) www. (while we are at it...)<br>9) Sea++ (but the compiler would be called Seaside...)<br>10) Small talk (why not?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After the inventing the Chrome browser ( not related to Mozilla 's chrome : //browser ) and the Closure compiler ( not related the Clojure compiler ) I have some suggestions for original names : 1 ) Zool2 ) Venkman3 ) Javaskript4 ) Firebug ( you ca n't tell me there is a Firebug programming language ) 5 ) Pie-Ton6 ) Ruvy7 ) .com ( since MS got away with .net ) 8 ) www .
( while we are at it... ) 9 ) Sea + + ( but the compiler would be called Seaside... ) 10 ) Small talk ( why not ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After the inventing the Chrome browser (not related to Mozilla's chrome://browser) and the Closure compiler (not related the Clojure compiler) I have some suggestions for original names:1) Zool2) Venkman3) Javaskript4) Firebug (you can't tell me there is a Firebug programming language)5) Pie-Ton6) Ruvy7) .com (since MS got away with .net)8) www.
(while we are at it...)9) Sea++ (but the compiler would be called Seaside...)10) Small talk (why not?
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073232</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1258043700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have way too much time to waste writing this poem,<br>and I have way too much time if I actually read it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have way too much time to waste writing this poem,and I have way too much time if I actually read it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have way too much time to waste writing this poem,and I have way too much time if I actually read it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072194</id>
	<title>Re:Goo</title>
	<author>db32</author>
	<datestamp>1258039500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What about "goog"?  Then they could allow variable declarations/functions/etc to be written forward or backwards.  Of course, then they would be competing with perl on difficult to read programs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about " goog " ?
Then they could allow variable declarations/functions/etc to be written forward or backwards .
Of course , then they would be competing with perl on difficult to read programs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about "goog"?
Then they could allow variable declarations/functions/etc to be written forward or backwards.
Of course, then they would be competing with perl on difficult to read programs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075410</id>
	<title>Re:Google should rename Go to Issue 9</title>
	<author>donaggie03</author>
	<datestamp>1258051440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>but "Plan9routines" just isn't as catchy . .</htmltext>
<tokenext>but " Plan9routines " just is n't as catchy .
.</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but "Plan9routines" just isn't as catchy .
.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30082464</id>
	<title>Re:So?</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1258037400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please, go jump off a bridge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please , go jump off a bridge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please, go jump off a bridge.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072946</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>SkyDude</author>
	<datestamp>1258042620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google will send the guy a check with several zeroes in it, relieve their guilty conscience and call it a day. C'mon, you know it will happen that way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google will send the guy a check with several zeroes in it , relieve their guilty conscience and call it a day .
C'mon , you know it will happen that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google will send the guy a check with several zeroes in it, relieve their guilty conscience and call it a day.
C'mon, you know it will happen that way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30081060</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258028400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In other news Microsoft announces a new language named Go#.  The language is used mostly for causing arthritis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In other news Microsoft announces a new language named Go # .
The language is used mostly for causing arthritis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other news Microsoft announces a new language named Go#.
The language is used mostly for causing arthritis.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074960</id>
	<title>Re:Someone is getting fired...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258050240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That comment was obviously supposed to be funny - responding seriously shows you have no sense of humor.</p><p>Also, I have to say that anyone who works at Google and doesn't know how to structure their searches to get the kind of results they need probably should be fired.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That comment was obviously supposed to be funny - responding seriously shows you have no sense of humor.Also , I have to say that anyone who works at Google and does n't know how to structure their searches to get the kind of results they need probably should be fired .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That comment was obviously supposed to be funny - responding seriously shows you have no sense of humor.Also, I have to say that anyone who works at Google and doesn't know how to structure their searches to get the kind of results they need probably should be fired.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073628</id>
	<title>A few new name for Google</title>
	<author>MrShaggy</author>
	<datestamp>1258045380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Programming language formerly known as go.</p><p>Go-be-gone</p><p>not-go</p><p>or go! for the C types out there</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Programming language formerly known as go.Go-be-gonenot-goor go !
for the C types out there</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Programming language formerly known as go.Go-be-gonenot-goor go!
for the C types out there</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071830</id>
	<title>"Under fire"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258037700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tag this one !news.</p><p>Since when is a gazillion-dollar company considered "under fire" because one dude with no legal status is annoyed at them?</p><p>By that logic, "McDonald's has come under fire this week for serving goodmanj a batch of stale fries last time he went there."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tag this one ! news.Since when is a gazillion-dollar company considered " under fire " because one dude with no legal status is annoyed at them ? By that logic , " McDonald 's has come under fire this week for serving goodmanj a batch of stale fries last time he went there .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tag this one !news.Since when is a gazillion-dollar company considered "under fire" because one dude with no legal status is annoyed at them?By that logic, "McDonald's has come under fire this week for serving goodmanj a batch of stale fries last time he went there.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840</id>
	<title>Google should rename Go to Issue 9</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258037760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>This was reported by the author in <a href="http://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=9" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Issue 9</a> [google.com]. There have been suggestions to rename the language to Issue 9 - I like it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This was reported by the author in Issue 9 [ google.com ] .
There have been suggestions to rename the language to Issue 9 - I like it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was reported by the author in Issue 9 [google.com].
There have been suggestions to rename the language to Issue 9 - I like it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076348</id>
	<title>Re:What about these names?</title>
	<author>kenrro</author>
	<datestamp>1258054380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why not RUN?, or MOVE?, or... DOSOMETHING! or...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not RUN ? , or MOVE ? , or... DOSOMETHING ! or.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not RUN?, or MOVE?, or... DOSOMETHING! or...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30085870</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>DaVince21</author>
	<datestamp>1258123020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.gog.com/" title="gog.com" rel="nofollow">Name's taken already.</a> [gog.com]</p><p>I think they should call it "togo". Because it's a language "to go" and because it sounds sproingy (like "pogo").</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Name 's taken already .
[ gog.com ] I think they should call it " togo " .
Because it 's a language " to go " and because it sounds sproingy ( like " pogo " ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Name's taken already.
[gog.com]I think they should call it "togo".
Because it's a language "to go" and because it sounds sproingy (like "pogo").</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071836</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30081184</id>
	<title>Re:They should change it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258028940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go#</p><p>Go++</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go # Go + +</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go#Go++</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075170</id>
	<title>How about those recursive acronyms?</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1258050840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't GING work? (Go is not Go!)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't GING work ?
( Go is not Go !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't GING work?
(Go is not Go!
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072702</id>
	<title>Google should change its name anyway</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258041600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about us Go board game players ! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go\_\%28game\%29<br>It was already hard enought to google it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about us Go board game players !
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go \ _ \ % 28game \ % 29It was already hard enought to google it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about us Go board game players !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go\_\%28game\%29It was already hard enought to google it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071932</id>
	<title>Goop?</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1258038120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think they should call it Goop. So much code produced by humans has looked like a blob from a bad sci-fi movie that it seems fitting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think they should call it Goop .
So much code produced by humans has looked like a blob from a bad sci-fi movie that it seems fitting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think they should call it Goop.
So much code produced by humans has looked like a blob from a bad sci-fi movie that it seems fitting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071682</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258037040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No one saw it coming. Including you reading this. Even the wikipedia article was created just yesterday.</p><p>The fact I toiled in my basement crafting a virtual machine language 20 years ago, glanced at my cup, and decided to call it java, doesn't me Sun should even give a damn my ego was bruised.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No one saw it coming .
Including you reading this .
Even the wikipedia article was created just yesterday.The fact I toiled in my basement crafting a virtual machine language 20 years ago , glanced at my cup , and decided to call it java , does n't me Sun should even give a damn my ego was bruised .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one saw it coming.
Including you reading this.
Even the wikipedia article was created just yesterday.The fact I toiled in my basement crafting a virtual machine language 20 years ago, glanced at my cup, and decided to call it java, doesn't me Sun should even give a damn my ego was bruised.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073538</id>
	<title>Re:Google should rename Go to Issue 9</title>
	<author>1jpablo1</author>
	<datestamp>1258045020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I vote for "so?".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I vote for " so ?
" .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I vote for "so?
".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078280</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>shaitand</author>
	<datestamp>1258017960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Not really. There was no malice here anywhere."</p><p>Yes actually there was. What isn't in the summary is that this guy contacted Google numerous times prior to their big announcement about Go. Google ignored him and released with the name Go anyway figuring they could hijack it for their language and get away it. That is deliberate malice.</p><p>How do I know? Because other people knew and talked about in the comments on the Slashdot story announcing Go.</p><p>Wikipedia entry or no, his little experiment is published in peer reviewed journals and cited in numerous places.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Not really .
There was no malice here anywhere .
" Yes actually there was .
What is n't in the summary is that this guy contacted Google numerous times prior to their big announcement about Go .
Google ignored him and released with the name Go anyway figuring they could hijack it for their language and get away it .
That is deliberate malice.How do I know ?
Because other people knew and talked about in the comments on the Slashdot story announcing Go.Wikipedia entry or no , his little experiment is published in peer reviewed journals and cited in numerous places .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Not really.
There was no malice here anywhere.
"Yes actually there was.
What isn't in the summary is that this guy contacted Google numerous times prior to their big announcement about Go.
Google ignored him and released with the name Go anyway figuring they could hijack it for their language and get away it.
That is deliberate malice.How do I know?
Because other people knew and talked about in the comments on the Slashdot story announcing Go.Wikipedia entry or no, his little experiment is published in peer reviewed journals and cited in numerous places.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075388</id>
	<title>Re:Someone is getting fired...</title>
	<author>kwerle</author>
	<datestamp>1258051380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I bet someone at Google will get fired soon...</p><p>Either 1 of 2 things may have happened:</p><p>1) They used Microsoft Bing to search for potential trademark violations<br>2) They were too lazy and didn't check at all.</p></div><p>I think you missed the flaming obvious third option:</p><p>The name is different: Go vs. Go!<br>They don't care about a non-trademarked name for a language that [virtually] nobody uses, and they like the name Go.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet someone at Google will get fired soon...Either 1 of 2 things may have happened : 1 ) They used Microsoft Bing to search for potential trademark violations2 ) They were too lazy and did n't check at all.I think you missed the flaming obvious third option : The name is different : Go vs. Go ! They do n't care about a non-trademarked name for a language that [ virtually ] nobody uses , and they like the name Go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet someone at Google will get fired soon...Either 1 of 2 things may have happened:1) They used Microsoft Bing to search for potential trademark violations2) They were too lazy and didn't check at all.I think you missed the flaming obvious third option:The name is different: Go vs. Go!They don't care about a non-trademarked name for a language that [virtually] nobody uses, and they like the name Go.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076080</id>
	<title>Re:Someone is getting fired...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258053540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why in the WORLD would you assume that he WANTS someone to get fired?  You don't have to be an asshole to be a pessimist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why in the WORLD would you assume that he WANTS someone to get fired ?
You do n't have to be an asshole to be a pessimist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why in the WORLD would you assume that he WANTS someone to get fired?
You don't have to be an asshole to be a pessimist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072042</id>
	<title>Re:Goo</title>
	<author>Misagon</author>
	<datestamp>1258038660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Goo" is a dialect of Lisp, so "Gooo" it is!</p><p>Personally, I think Google should rename it "Giggity"..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Goo " is a dialect of Lisp , so " Gooo " it is ! Personally , I think Google should rename it " Giggity " . .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Goo" is a dialect of Lisp, so "Gooo" it is!Personally, I think Google should rename it "Giggity"..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073058</id>
	<title>Re:Google should rename Go to Issue 9</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1258043040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like the "lifestyle" magazine of District 9, but hey, why not?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like the " lifestyle " magazine of District 9 , but hey , why not ?
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like the "lifestyle" magazine of District 9, but hey, why not?
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071898</id>
	<title>Easily avoidable</title>
	<author>4D6963</author>
	<datestamp>1258038000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Couldn't they have googled the name first? You'd kind of expect at least that from them..

</p><p>Not like Go is such a great name anyway. They should run a poll to decide the name. With enough luck it'll get called Marblecake or Colbert++.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could n't they have googled the name first ?
You 'd kind of expect at least that from them. . Not like Go is such a great name anyway .
They should run a poll to decide the name .
With enough luck it 'll get called Marblecake or Colbert + + .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Couldn't they have googled the name first?
You'd kind of expect at least that from them..

Not like Go is such a great name anyway.
They should run a poll to decide the name.
With enough luck it'll get called Marblecake or Colbert++.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077914</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258016580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think they should rename it to "Goo"</p></div><p>2go?</p><p>O!go  (tribute to object oriented.. conveniently, you could tell people "oh, go (away); or oh, go (screw yourself))</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think they should rename it to " Goo " 2go ? O ! go ( tribute to object oriented.. conveniently , you could tell people " oh , go ( away ) ; or oh , go ( screw yourself ) )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think they should rename it to "Goo"2go?O!go  (tribute to object oriented.. conveniently, you could tell people "oh, go (away); or oh, go (screw yourself))
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30081838</id>
	<title>Re:Beyond that, 'Go' is not google unique</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258032600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While you have a good point, why would you google for '.net "string concatenation"'?</p><p>Since string concatenation syntax is generally language specific, rather than library or runtime specific, wouldn't you search for;</p><p>1. c# "string concatenation"<br>2. VB "string concatenation"<br>3. f# "string concatentation"</p><p>All these produce very specific results.</p><p>On that note, searching for VB.NET "string concatentation" isn't very helpful at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While you have a good point , why would you google for '.net " string concatenation " ' ? Since string concatenation syntax is generally language specific , rather than library or runtime specific , would n't you search for ; 1. c # " string concatenation " 2 .
VB " string concatenation " 3. f # " string concatentation " All these produce very specific results.On that note , searching for VB.NET " string concatentation " is n't very helpful at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While you have a good point, why would you google for '.net "string concatenation"'?Since string concatenation syntax is generally language specific, rather than library or runtime specific, wouldn't you search for;1. c# "string concatenation"2.
VB "string concatenation"3. f# "string concatentation"All these produce very specific results.On that note, searching for VB.NET "string concatentation" isn't very helpful at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073228</id>
	<title>It should ...</title>
	<author>xewill</author>
	<datestamp>1258043700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...ofcourse be called GoTwo</htmltext>
<tokenext>...ofcourse be called GoTwo</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...ofcourse be called GoTwo</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073306</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258044000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps not but if Sun then turned-around and sued you for using the name "Java" for your VM language from twenty years ago, I think you'd be rightfully upset.  This has been known to happen before, where a company trademarks a name, and then sues other prior inventors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps not but if Sun then turned-around and sued you for using the name " Java " for your VM language from twenty years ago , I think you 'd be rightfully upset .
This has been known to happen before , where a company trademarks a name , and then sues other prior inventors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps not but if Sun then turned-around and sued you for using the name "Java" for your VM language from twenty years ago, I think you'd be rightfully upset.
This has been known to happen before, where a company trademarks a name, and then sues other prior inventors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076694</id>
	<title>How about...</title>
	<author>submain</author>
	<datestamp>1258055580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just put an @ sign after it:

Go@ (goat)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just put an @ sign after it : Go @ ( goat )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just put an @ sign after it:

Go@ (goat)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30084834</id>
	<title>Go and Gobang</title>
	<author>Ignatius</author>
	<datestamp>1258109820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Besides being the names of two traditional Asian board games people successully told apart for millenia, if we can handle C, C++ and C#, why should Go and Go! ("Go-bang") be a problem?</p><p>ignatius</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Besides being the names of two traditional Asian board games people successully told apart for millenia , if we can handle C , C + + and C # , why should Go and Go !
( " Go-bang " ) be a problem ? ignatius</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Besides being the names of two traditional Asian board games people successully told apart for millenia, if we can handle C, C++ and C#, why should Go and Go!
("Go-bang") be a problem?ignatius</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076536</id>
	<title>Re:Non-issue</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1258054920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Believe me, if there's at least one lawyer working for Google, they knew. Even most start-ups research a product name before announcing it. They probably just figured they could pay the guy off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Believe me , if there 's at least one lawyer working for Google , they knew .
Even most start-ups research a product name before announcing it .
They probably just figured they could pay the guy off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Believe me, if there's at least one lawyer working for Google, they knew.
Even most start-ups research a product name before announcing it.
They probably just figured they could pay the guy off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077424</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258058040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>sorry, alread taken:<br><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=Goo+programming+language" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=Goo+programming+language (google search)</a> [google.com]<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goo\_(programming\_language)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goo\_\%28programming\_language\%29 (wikipedia article is first google search hit)</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sorry , alread taken : http : //www.google.com/search ? hl = en&amp;q = Goo + programming + language ( google search ) [ google.com ] http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goo \ _ \ % 28programming \ _language \ % 29 ( wikipedia article is first google search hit ) [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sorry, alread taken:http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=Goo+programming+language (google search) [google.com]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goo\_\%28programming\_language\%29 (wikipedia article is first google search hit) [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071916</id>
	<title>Google simply does not care.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258038060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google does whatever it damn pleases. The "do no evil" slogan has lost its meaning because Google is convinced that it simply cannot do evil and everything it does is for the good of mankind and everybody else is a heretic anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google does whatever it damn pleases .
The " do no evil " slogan has lost its meaning because Google is convinced that it simply can not do evil and everything it does is for the good of mankind and everybody else is a heretic anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google does whatever it damn pleases.
The "do no evil" slogan has lost its meaning because Google is convinced that it simply cannot do evil and everything it does is for the good of mankind and everybody else is a heretic anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073462</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Shadow Wrought</author>
	<datestamp>1258044600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That was my thought, too.  It doesn't seem like they are in different categories so much as different leagues.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That was my thought , too .
It does n't seem like they are in different categories so much as different leagues .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was my thought, too.
It doesn't seem like they are in different categories so much as different leagues.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071902</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1258038000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everything I see as a result for that langauge is for Google for the first several pages.  It was probably different a few week, but it's silly to link to it now.</p><p>Really though, someone has probably created a language named everything you can think of.  Sorry some language no one has ever heard of shares the name of a new language created by <strong>GO</strong>ogle.  I'm sure someone will tell us about how they've been using it for years, but I'm sorry, there have been more people using googles In the last 24 hours than every used the other has every dreamed of.</p><p>Don't use a two letter word for the name, there are a rather limited number of combinations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everything I see as a result for that langauge is for Google for the first several pages .
It was probably different a few week , but it 's silly to link to it now.Really though , someone has probably created a language named everything you can think of .
Sorry some language no one has ever heard of shares the name of a new language created by GOogle .
I 'm sure someone will tell us about how they 've been using it for years , but I 'm sorry , there have been more people using googles In the last 24 hours than every used the other has every dreamed of.Do n't use a two letter word for the name , there are a rather limited number of combinations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everything I see as a result for that langauge is for Google for the first several pages.
It was probably different a few week, but it's silly to link to it now.Really though, someone has probably created a language named everything you can think of.
Sorry some language no one has ever heard of shares the name of a new language created by GOogle.
I'm sure someone will tell us about how they've been using it for years, but I'm sorry, there have been more people using googles In the last 24 hours than every used the other has every dreamed of.Don't use a two letter word for the name, there are a rather limited number of combinations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073744</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258046040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Threaded intercal is better than regular intercal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Threaded intercal is better than regular intercal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Threaded intercal is better than regular intercal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30084132</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmm...</title>
	<author>williamhb</author>
	<datestamp>1258055220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Simply using the name in a commercial capacity is enough to get an unregistered trademark. However, the problem is that he is not selling the Go! programming language. If it's not a commercial entity, then trademark doesn't apply.</p></div><p>He has a <a href="http://www.lulu.com/content/paperback-book/lets-go/641689" title="lulu.com">book for sale</a> [lulu.com] on the programming language.  That sounds like using the name in a commercial capacity to me.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Simply using the name in a commercial capacity is enough to get an unregistered trademark .
However , the problem is that he is not selling the Go !
programming language .
If it 's not a commercial entity , then trademark does n't apply.He has a book for sale [ lulu.com ] on the programming language .
That sounds like using the name in a commercial capacity to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Simply using the name in a commercial capacity is enough to get an unregistered trademark.
However, the problem is that he is not selling the Go!
programming language.
If it's not a commercial entity, then trademark doesn't apply.He has a book for sale [lulu.com] on the programming language.
That sounds like using the name in a commercial capacity to me.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072070</id>
	<title>How about 0G?</title>
	<author>s09</author>
	<datestamp>1258038840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think this sounds light.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this sounds light .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this sounds light.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072368</id>
	<title>Re:Non-issue</title>
	<author>nomadic</author>
	<datestamp>1258040220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i> if Google are unaware that it exists then it shows quite how insular they have become - obviously they didn't even think of checking whether anyone else had used the name.</i>
<br>
<br>
Hey it's not their fault.  If only they had access to some sort of computer system that allowed one to quickly examine the internet, a "search engine" if you will, then they might have been able to catch this in time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>if Google are unaware that it exists then it shows quite how insular they have become - obviously they did n't even think of checking whether anyone else had used the name .
Hey it 's not their fault .
If only they had access to some sort of computer system that allowed one to quickly examine the internet , a " search engine " if you will , then they might have been able to catch this in time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> if Google are unaware that it exists then it shows quite how insular they have become - obviously they didn't even think of checking whether anyone else had used the name.
Hey it's not their fault.
If only they had access to some sort of computer system that allowed one to quickly examine the internet, a "search engine" if you will, then they might have been able to catch this in time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072098</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258039020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ROFLMAO. Awesome</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ROFLMAO .
Awesome</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ROFLMAO.
Awesome</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</id>
	<title>People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258038060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google's language is called Go! (with an exclamation mark.) The  preexisting language whose existence has been suddenly and rudely revealed is called Go without the exclamation mark. Since ! is the negation operator, the Google's language is Go (Not). People don't seem to realize the full implications of the name.<p>

It originates from the <a href="http://www.u.arizona.edu/~rubinson/copyright\_violations/Go\_To\_Considered\_Harmful.html" title="arizona.edu" rel="nofollow"> paper by Dijkstra </a> [arizona.edu] where he argued GoTo statements should be banned. That resulted in many structured programming languages main stream computer science. But what is not known is that the same paper spawned a new set of less well known languages based on <b>"COME FROM"</b> statement to avoid the <b>"GO TO"</b> statement. The Go! (pronounced Go-Not) language belongs to this little known branch. It is completely and entirely different from the plain old Go language. </p><p>

Dont get me started on the Japanese chess game Go.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google 's language is called Go !
( with an exclamation mark .
) The preexisting language whose existence has been suddenly and rudely revealed is called Go without the exclamation mark .
Since !
is the negation operator , the Google 's language is Go ( Not ) .
People do n't seem to realize the full implications of the name .
It originates from the paper by Dijkstra [ arizona.edu ] where he argued GoTo statements should be banned .
That resulted in many structured programming languages main stream computer science .
But what is not known is that the same paper spawned a new set of less well known languages based on " COME FROM " statement to avoid the " GO TO " statement .
The Go !
( pronounced Go-Not ) language belongs to this little known branch .
It is completely and entirely different from the plain old Go language .
Dont get me started on the Japanese chess game Go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google's language is called Go!
(with an exclamation mark.
) The  preexisting language whose existence has been suddenly and rudely revealed is called Go without the exclamation mark.
Since !
is the negation operator, the Google's language is Go (Not).
People don't seem to realize the full implications of the name.
It originates from the  paper by Dijkstra  [arizona.edu] where he argued GoTo statements should be banned.
That resulted in many structured programming languages main stream computer science.
But what is not known is that the same paper spawned a new set of less well known languages based on "COME FROM" statement to avoid the "GO TO" statement.
The Go!
(pronounced Go-Not) language belongs to this little known branch.
It is completely and entirely different from the plain old Go language.
Dont get me started on the Japanese chess game Go.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073552</id>
	<title>What about "Chrome"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258045080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google did the same thing a while back by naming its browser "Chrome", despite "chrome" already being a major part of Mozilla-based software.  That *had* to be intentional, no?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google did the same thing a while back by naming its browser " Chrome " , despite " chrome " already being a major part of Mozilla-based software .
That * had * to be intentional , no ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google did the same thing a while back by naming its browser "Chrome", despite "chrome" already being a major part of Mozilla-based software.
That *had* to be intentional, no?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073676</id>
	<title>Re:'GO' != 'GO!'</title>
	<author>bigpat</author>
	<datestamp>1258045740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're observation is spot on.  I doubt Microsoft asked permission from the creators of the C programming language when they came out with C# and decided that is what they were going to name it...  and C is a widely used language, where "Go Bang" really isn't.</p><p>From a copyright perspective, I know books and movies can have the same title and not be considered infringing.  Google might have trouble trying to claim a trademark on it though if it was already being used by these guys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're observation is spot on .
I doubt Microsoft asked permission from the creators of the C programming language when they came out with C # and decided that is what they were going to name it... and C is a widely used language , where " Go Bang " really is n't.From a copyright perspective , I know books and movies can have the same title and not be considered infringing .
Google might have trouble trying to claim a trademark on it though if it was already being used by these guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're observation is spot on.
I doubt Microsoft asked permission from the creators of the C programming language when they came out with C# and decided that is what they were going to name it...  and C is a widely used language, where "Go Bang" really isn't.From a copyright perspective, I know books and movies can have the same title and not be considered infringing.
Google might have trouble trying to claim a trademark on it though if it was already being used by these guys.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650</id>
	<title>Go!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258036740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's actually pretty funny Google itself didn't see this coming. Results in Google for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=go+programming+language" title="google.com">go programming language</a> [google.com] are about the existing Go! language and the main developers book about it.</p><p>In this case Google should really change the name since its been used in an existing programming language for years. But maybe they are:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>"We recently became aware of the Go! issue and are now looking into the matter further," a company spokesperson said in an e-mail.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's actually pretty funny Google itself did n't see this coming .
Results in Google for go programming language [ google.com ] are about the existing Go !
language and the main developers book about it.In this case Google should really change the name since its been used in an existing programming language for years .
But maybe they are : " We recently became aware of the Go !
issue and are now looking into the matter further , " a company spokesperson said in an e-mail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's actually pretty funny Google itself didn't see this coming.
Results in Google for go programming language [google.com] are about the existing Go!
language and the main developers book about it.In this case Google should really change the name since its been used in an existing programming language for years.
But maybe they are:"We recently became aware of the Go!
issue and are now looking into the matter further," a company spokesperson said in an e-mail.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30084792</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>ChunderDownunder</author>
	<datestamp>1258109220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>and honestly sounds close to "Poo".</p></div></blockquote><p>

Poo is a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Po,\_Asturias" title="wikipedia.org">village in Spain</a> [wikipedia.org]. I passed through their train station several years back, on the way to Oviedo.
<br> <br>
They were pressured into "Castilianizing" the name (no double 'o') perhaps because some gringo tourist found it offensive!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and honestly sounds close to " Poo " .
Poo is a village in Spain [ wikipedia.org ] .
I passed through their train station several years back , on the way to Oviedo .
They were pressured into " Castilianizing " the name ( no double 'o ' ) perhaps because some gringo tourist found it offensive !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and honestly sounds close to "Poo".
Poo is a village in Spain [wikipedia.org].
I passed through their train station several years back, on the way to Oviedo.
They were pressured into "Castilianizing" the name (no double 'o') perhaps because some gringo tourist found it offensive!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072080</id>
	<title>Does that mean "Go" is a "No Go"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258038900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>--Stak</htmltext>
<tokenext>--Stak</tokentext>
<sentencetext>--Stak</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30085192</id>
	<title>Re:Goo</title>
	<author>Dr.Ruud</author>
	<datestamp>1258115460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suggest: gloo</p><p>(Perl is my glue)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suggest : gloo ( Perl is my glue )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suggest: gloo(Perl is my glue)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073506</id>
	<title>What about these names?</title>
	<author>RonMcMahon</author>
	<datestamp>1258044780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since Go! is taken, what about STOP  or STALL?<br> <br>

I would have suggested BING! (But Its NOT Go!) but it seems that someone else is using that name...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since Go !
is taken , what about STOP or STALL ?
I would have suggested BING !
( But Its NOT Go !
) but it seems that someone else is using that name.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since Go!
is taken, what about STOP  or STALL?
I would have suggested BING!
(But Its NOT Go!
) but it seems that someone else is using that name...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072184</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258039440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Dont get me started on the Japanese chess game Go.</p></div><p>I don't know if your post was supposed to be either sarcastic or funny, but <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go\_(game)" title="wikipedia.org">Go</a> [wikipedia.org] is neither Japanese nor chess.</p><p>It's Chinese, and it's older than chess.</p><p>The game commonly referred to as "Japanese chess" is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shogi" title="wikipedia.org">Shogi</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dont get me started on the Japanese chess game Go.I do n't know if your post was supposed to be either sarcastic or funny , but Go [ wikipedia.org ] is neither Japanese nor chess.It 's Chinese , and it 's older than chess.The game commonly referred to as " Japanese chess " is Shogi [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dont get me started on the Japanese chess game Go.I don't know if your post was supposed to be either sarcastic or funny, but Go [wikipedia.org] is neither Japanese nor chess.It's Chinese, and it's older than chess.The game commonly referred to as "Japanese chess" is Shogi [wikipedia.org].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072378</id>
	<title>Alternatives</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258040220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FIVETRAN<br>GOBOL<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FIVETRANGOBOL ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FIVETRANGOBOL ....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072776</id>
	<title>Come on editors...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258041960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This story just asks for &#229; !Go! tag, how can anyone resist?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This story just asks for   ! Go !
tag , how can anyone resist ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This story just asks for å !Go!
tag, how can anyone resist?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077286</id>
	<title>Re:People! Punctuation is IMPORTANT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258057560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Go" is Japanese in the sense that the word is Japanese.  In the same sense that futons are Japanese except not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Go " is Japanese in the sense that the word is Japanese .
In the same sense that futons are Japanese except not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Go" is Japanese in the sense that the word is Japanese.
In the same sense that futons are Japanese except not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072352</id>
	<title>Re:Google should rename Go to Issue 9</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258040100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read that too, I think it should be "Issue 9" as well</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read that too , I think it should be " Issue 9 " as well</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read that too, I think it should be "Issue 9" as well</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078502</id>
	<title>Re:Non-issue</title>
	<author>shaitand</author>
	<datestamp>1258018860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Google was unaware that the name was taken."</p><p>If so they were deliberately being obtuse. People already knew about this at their launch and were talking about how the Go! guy has been sending the project letters and filling out contact forms for some time now with no response.</p><p>I think its more of a case of Google thinking they were more important than some academic and could squash him and keep their name since he has no trademark (a common english word wouldn't qualify for trademark unless you can grease pockets). Thats great for a legal court but now they are in the court of public opinion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Google was unaware that the name was taken .
" If so they were deliberately being obtuse .
People already knew about this at their launch and were talking about how the Go !
guy has been sending the project letters and filling out contact forms for some time now with no response.I think its more of a case of Google thinking they were more important than some academic and could squash him and keep their name since he has no trademark ( a common english word would n't qualify for trademark unless you can grease pockets ) .
Thats great for a legal court but now they are in the court of public opinion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Google was unaware that the name was taken.
"If so they were deliberately being obtuse.
People already knew about this at their launch and were talking about how the Go!
guy has been sending the project letters and filling out contact forms for some time now with no response.I think its more of a case of Google thinking they were more important than some academic and could squash him and keep their name since he has no trademark (a common english word wouldn't qualify for trademark unless you can grease pockets).
Thats great for a legal court but now they are in the court of public opinion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077554</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>gheff</author>
	<datestamp>1258058580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GOOGOL maybe?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GOOGOL maybe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GOOGOL maybe?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072876</id>
	<title>It's a stupid name for a language all around</title>
	<author>pem</author>
	<datestamp>1258042380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You'd think that google, of all companies, would realize that making people google for "go" is practically a non-starter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'd think that google , of all companies , would realize that making people google for " go " is practically a non-starter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'd think that google, of all companies, would realize that making people google for "go" is practically a non-starter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077540</id>
	<title>Re:Someone is getting fired...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258058520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I bet you work for the government or something.  People make mistakes.</p></div><p>I thought the objection to allowing the government to run things was that incompetent people couldn't be fired.</p><p>I guess you must work for large bank with TARP funding and expect a bonus for kicking off the closest thing we can have to a worldwide depression.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet you work for the government or something .
People make mistakes.I thought the objection to allowing the government to run things was that incompetent people could n't be fired.I guess you must work for large bank with TARP funding and expect a bonus for kicking off the closest thing we can have to a worldwide depression .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet you work for the government or something.
People make mistakes.I thought the objection to allowing the government to run things was that incompetent people couldn't be fired.I guess you must work for large bank with TARP funding and expect a bonus for kicking off the closest thing we can have to a worldwide depression.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072110</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258039080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's actually pretty funny Google itself didn't see this coming. Results in Google for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=go+programming+language" title="google.com">go programming language</a> [google.com] are about the existing Go! language and the main developers book about it.</p><p>In this case Google should really change the name since its been used in an existing programming language for years. But maybe they are:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>"We recently became aware of the Go! issue and are now looking into the matter further," a company spokesperson said in an e-mail.</p></div></div><p>I don't know what they need to look into.  There are only two real aspects to look at here.  First, from a technical standpoint, it could confuse people want to learn Google's Go and end up learning the other Go.  From a legal standpoint, if the guy didn't trademark the name, who cares?  He doesn't really have a case.  But it does kind of fly in the face of the "Don't be evil" slogan.</p><p>If they want to be nice, they could just rename it to something like Go++ or Go2.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's actually pretty funny Google itself did n't see this coming .
Results in Google for go programming language [ google.com ] are about the existing Go !
language and the main developers book about it.In this case Google should really change the name since its been used in an existing programming language for years .
But maybe they are : " We recently became aware of the Go !
issue and are now looking into the matter further , " a company spokesperson said in an e-mail.I do n't know what they need to look into .
There are only two real aspects to look at here .
First , from a technical standpoint , it could confuse people want to learn Google 's Go and end up learning the other Go .
From a legal standpoint , if the guy did n't trademark the name , who cares ?
He does n't really have a case .
But it does kind of fly in the face of the " Do n't be evil " slogan.If they want to be nice , they could just rename it to something like Go + + or Go2 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's actually pretty funny Google itself didn't see this coming.
Results in Google for go programming language [google.com] are about the existing Go!
language and the main developers book about it.In this case Google should really change the name since its been used in an existing programming language for years.
But maybe they are:"We recently became aware of the Go!
issue and are now looking into the matter further," a company spokesperson said in an e-mail.I don't know what they need to look into.
There are only two real aspects to look at here.
First, from a technical standpoint, it could confuse people want to learn Google's Go and end up learning the other Go.
From a legal standpoint, if the guy didn't trademark the name, who cares?
He doesn't really have a case.
But it does kind of fly in the face of the "Don't be evil" slogan.If they want to be nice, they could just rename it to something like Go++ or Go2.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072716</id>
	<title>Re:Goo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258041720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go Oogle!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go Oogle !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go Oogle!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30082652</id>
	<title>Re:Tingo?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258039440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go! is already taken so<br>they should use !Go</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go !
is already taken sothey should use ! Go</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go!
is already taken sothey should use !Go</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075282</id>
	<title>Google Books entry borked...Coincidence?</title>
	<author>14erCleaner</author>
	<datestamp>1258051080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>McCabe's book "<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=jyIrfDokmKgC&amp;dq=isbn:0975444913" title="google.com">Let's Go!</a> [google.com]" is available on Google Books, but the "More Book Information" section is a little, um, inaccurate:<blockquote><div><p> <tt>Title  Let's go<br>Author  Nitty Gritty Dirt Band<br>Publisher  Lulu.com, 1983<br>ISBN  0975444913, 9780975444917<br>Subjects  Rock music</tt></p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>McCabe 's book " Let 's Go !
[ google.com ] " is available on Google Books , but the " More Book Information " section is a little , um , inaccurate : Title Let 's goAuthor Nitty Gritty Dirt BandPublisher Lulu.com , 1983ISBN 0975444913 , 9780975444917Subjects Rock music</tokentext>
<sentencetext>McCabe's book "Let's Go!
[google.com]" is available on Google Books, but the "More Book Information" section is a little, um, inaccurate: Title  Let's goAuthor  Nitty Gritty Dirt BandPublisher  Lulu.com, 1983ISBN  0975444913, 9780975444917Subjects  Rock music 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30082340</id>
	<title>Still premature, getting the hype cycle rolling</title>
	<author>recharged95</author>
	<datestamp>1258036440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"The current implementation is a plain mark-and-sweep collector but a replacement is in the works."
<br>
<br>
At that point....no thanks for now.

<br>
<br>
I wonder if this is going to be the new Ruby.

<br>
<br>
Also, looking at the tutorials: nice job at recreating Ada. Really.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The current implementation is a plain mark-and-sweep collector but a replacement is in the works .
" At that point....no thanks for now .
I wonder if this is going to be the new Ruby .
Also , looking at the tutorials : nice job at recreating Ada .
Really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The current implementation is a plain mark-and-sweep collector but a replacement is in the works.
"


At that point....no thanks for now.
I wonder if this is going to be the new Ruby.
Also, looking at the tutorials: nice job at recreating Ada.
Really.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073534</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258045020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goo\_(programming\_language)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Goo is a Lisp/Dylan dialect</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Goo is a Lisp/Dylan dialect [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Goo is a Lisp/Dylan dialect [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072324</id>
	<title>Re:So?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258040040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You don't copyright a name. If you would - there's no real paperwork involved. Copyright is automatic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't copyright a name .
If you would - there 's no real paperwork involved .
Copyright is automatic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't copyright a name.
If you would - there's no real paperwork involved.
Copyright is automatic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075398</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Iron Condor</author>
	<datestamp>1258051440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>  But it does kind of fly in the face of the "Don't be evil" slogan.</p></div><p>Not really. There was no malice here anywhere. Nobody tried to be evil, nobody is trying to be evil this moment and nobody is trying to be evil in the future.

</p><p>Some dude had an idea a couple years back that was so <i>utterly obscure</i>that no Wikipedia page existed for it. Let that sink in: There's a page on Wikipedia for every actor that was ever seen in the background of any Star Trek episode; yet this supposed "Go language" was so unknown that nobody ever bothered to make a page for it (until yesterday). And the name is a two letter word that cannot actually be googled and is as useless as "to" or "for"  or "a" as a search term.

</p><p>And somehow Google are "evil" for inventing something completely fresh, new, different, that has seen more use in the first 24 hours after release than all of the other guy's stuff in his lifetime and naming it "go"? Sorry, but that just doesn't fly.

</p><p>The guy should be happy for the exposure and publicity his little thought experiment got from all this.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But it does kind of fly in the face of the " Do n't be evil " slogan.Not really .
There was no malice here anywhere .
Nobody tried to be evil , nobody is trying to be evil this moment and nobody is trying to be evil in the future .
Some dude had an idea a couple years back that was so utterly obscurethat no Wikipedia page existed for it .
Let that sink in : There 's a page on Wikipedia for every actor that was ever seen in the background of any Star Trek episode ; yet this supposed " Go language " was so unknown that nobody ever bothered to make a page for it ( until yesterday ) .
And the name is a two letter word that can not actually be googled and is as useless as " to " or " for " or " a " as a search term .
And somehow Google are " evil " for inventing something completely fresh , new , different , that has seen more use in the first 24 hours after release than all of the other guy 's stuff in his lifetime and naming it " go " ?
Sorry , but that just does n't fly .
The guy should be happy for the exposure and publicity his little thought experiment got from all this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  But it does kind of fly in the face of the "Don't be evil" slogan.Not really.
There was no malice here anywhere.
Nobody tried to be evil, nobody is trying to be evil this moment and nobody is trying to be evil in the future.
Some dude had an idea a couple years back that was so utterly obscurethat no Wikipedia page existed for it.
Let that sink in: There's a page on Wikipedia for every actor that was ever seen in the background of any Star Trek episode; yet this supposed "Go language" was so unknown that nobody ever bothered to make a page for it (until yesterday).
And the name is a two letter word that cannot actually be googled and is as useless as "to" or "for"  or "a" as a search term.
And somehow Google are "evil" for inventing something completely fresh, new, different, that has seen more use in the first 24 hours after release than all of the other guy's stuff in his lifetime and naming it "go"?
Sorry, but that just doesn't fly.
The guy should be happy for the exposure and publicity his little thought experiment got from all this.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072110</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30082422</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1258037100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Names exist for reasons, and having two languages with the same name violates the most basic one. It's not like Google has any big need to call their language 'Go'. The decent thing to do is to at least consider the little guy, and in this case that means coming up with a unique name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Names exist for reasons , and having two languages with the same name violates the most basic one .
It 's not like Google has any big need to call their language 'Go' .
The decent thing to do is to at least consider the little guy , and in this case that means coming up with a unique name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Names exist for reasons, and having two languages with the same name violates the most basic one.
It's not like Google has any big need to call their language 'Go'.
The decent thing to do is to at least consider the little guy, and in this case that means coming up with a unique name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074468</id>
	<title>Phoenix!</title>
	<author>Prien715</author>
	<datestamp>1258048860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should rename it Phoenix.  Or maybe Firebird!</p><p>You see, open source projects never have naming conflicts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should rename it Phoenix .
Or maybe Firebird ! You see , open source projects never have naming conflicts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should rename it Phoenix.
Or maybe Firebird!You see, open source projects never have naming conflicts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071884</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>iamhassi</author>
	<datestamp>1258037880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>from the article:<br>
<br>
There once was a language named "Go" <br>
By Google it's made to help the Pro<br>
But there's a claim the name<br>
it sounds quite the same<br>
as another fellow's lingo<br>
<br>
This other lingo named "Go!"<br>
"It was earlier" it's inventor says so.<br>
"Why didn't you look<br>
on a webpage or in my book,<br>
it's even google search result two!"<br>
<br>
"So Google, rename your thing!<br>
Or in front of a judge you i bring!<br>
Lots of users agree<br>
it was disgraceful by thee<br>
just be sorry and give me a ring!"<br>
<br>
So the question arise<br>
allthough google might despise<br>
"what new name shall we be giving<br>
to the lingo that's not yet living<br>
and has not yet seen this world with it's own eyes?"<br>
<br>
One fella proposed the name "Goo"<br>
Which is similar to pythons clone "Boo"<br>
But also this name is taken<br>
and not yet forsaken<br>
and honestly sounds close to "Poo".<br>
<br>
Another said "Lango" is cool,<br>
He would take such thing as a tool.<br>
But a lingo named "Lango"<br>
Only rhymes "Jango" or "Tango"<br>
This is real, not Star Wars, you fool!<br>
<br>
Lots of other names were called<br>
some were boring, some others were bold<br>
The question still remain<br>
Will google act or refrain<br>
from renaming it's lingo as told?<br>
<br>
The remainder of my little piece<br>
Is the ironic issue of this<br>
Why did you, google miss<br>
to google "go" before release<br>
You would have known it's not your name, but his'!</htmltext>
<tokenext>from the article : There once was a language named " Go " By Google it 's made to help the Pro But there 's a claim the name it sounds quite the same as another fellow 's lingo This other lingo named " Go !
" " It was earlier " it 's inventor says so .
" Why did n't you look on a webpage or in my book , it 's even google search result two !
" " So Google , rename your thing !
Or in front of a judge you i bring !
Lots of users agree it was disgraceful by thee just be sorry and give me a ring !
" So the question arise allthough google might despise " what new name shall we be giving to the lingo that 's not yet living and has not yet seen this world with it 's own eyes ?
" One fella proposed the name " Goo " Which is similar to pythons clone " Boo " But also this name is taken and not yet forsaken and honestly sounds close to " Poo " .
Another said " Lango " is cool , He would take such thing as a tool .
But a lingo named " Lango " Only rhymes " Jango " or " Tango " This is real , not Star Wars , you fool !
Lots of other names were called some were boring , some others were bold The question still remain Will google act or refrain from renaming it 's lingo as told ?
The remainder of my little piece Is the ironic issue of this Why did you , google miss to google " go " before release You would have known it 's not your name , but his ' !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>from the article:

There once was a language named "Go" 
By Google it's made to help the Pro
But there's a claim the name
it sounds quite the same
as another fellow's lingo

This other lingo named "Go!
"
"It was earlier" it's inventor says so.
"Why didn't you look
on a webpage or in my book,
it's even google search result two!
"

"So Google, rename your thing!
Or in front of a judge you i bring!
Lots of users agree
it was disgraceful by thee
just be sorry and give me a ring!
"

So the question arise
allthough google might despise
"what new name shall we be giving
to the lingo that's not yet living
and has not yet seen this world with it's own eyes?
"

One fella proposed the name "Goo"
Which is similar to pythons clone "Boo"
But also this name is taken
and not yet forsaken
and honestly sounds close to "Poo".
Another said "Lango" is cool,
He would take such thing as a tool.
But a lingo named "Lango"
Only rhymes "Jango" or "Tango"
This is real, not Star Wars, you fool!
Lots of other names were called
some were boring, some others were bold
The question still remain
Will google act or refrain
from renaming it's lingo as told?
The remainder of my little piece
Is the ironic issue of this
Why did you, google miss
to google "go" before release
You would have known it's not your name, but his'!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074114</id>
	<title>Re:Wikipedia proposes deletion of Go! page</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258047600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and I'm asking, why is this already posted on slashdot!</p><p>I smell astroturf.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and I 'm asking , why is this already posted on slashdot ! I smell astroturf .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and I'm asking, why is this already posted on slashdot!I smell astroturf.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072260</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30082594</id>
	<title>Re:Tingo? NOGO!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258038840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Call it NOGO.  Not Only GO</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Call it NOGO .
Not Only GO</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Call it NOGO.
Not Only GO</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30084810</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>RichiH</author>
	<datestamp>1258109460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>$ 000,000,000.01</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>$ 000,000,000.01</tokentext>
<sentencetext>$ 000,000,000.01</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072790</id>
	<title>Google this, Google that</title>
	<author>burris</author>
	<datestamp>1258042020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People are coming down on "Google" but I was under the impression that this was just some Google engineer's pet project ("20\%" time) with maybe some help from his friends there.  Lots of stuff coming out of Google is like this because of Google's very liberal policies. However, people always act like everything that comes out of the company is some strategic product driven by the highest levels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People are coming down on " Google " but I was under the impression that this was just some Google engineer 's pet project ( " 20 \ % " time ) with maybe some help from his friends there .
Lots of stuff coming out of Google is like this because of Google 's very liberal policies .
However , people always act like everything that comes out of the company is some strategic product driven by the highest levels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People are coming down on "Google" but I was under the impression that this was just some Google engineer's pet project ("20\%" time) with maybe some help from his friends there.
Lots of stuff coming out of Google is like this because of Google's very liberal policies.
However, people always act like everything that comes out of the company is some strategic product driven by the highest levels.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073068</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>Maxo-Texas</author>
	<datestamp>1258043100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then female goo programmers could be goog'ls</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then female goo programmers could be goog'ls</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then female goo programmers could be goog'ls</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071794</id>
	<title>I know how to fix it!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258037520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's change Google's to Goo.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's change Google 's to Goo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's change Google's to Goo.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072006</id>
	<title>Re:So?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258038480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, I see you are an American. Arrogant as usual.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , I see you are an American .
Arrogant as usual .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, I see you are an American.
Arrogant as usual.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076192</id>
	<title>This is Evil</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258053900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is Evil</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is Evil</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is Evil</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076590</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmm...</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1258055160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"If it's not a commercial entity, then trademark doesn't apply."</p><p>You mean I can still trademark a "GPL" product as long as I offer it for sale?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" If it 's not a commercial entity , then trademark does n't apply .
" You mean I can still trademark a " GPL " product as long as I offer it for sale ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"If it's not a commercial entity, then trademark doesn't apply.
"You mean I can still trademark a "GPL" product as long as I offer it for sale?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30087554</id>
	<title>What's the problem!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258131540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We all know next year there will be hundreds of job ads requesting programmers with 5 years experience programming in Go.  So this guys PhD students will all get jobs.  It's a win win situation!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We all know next year there will be hundreds of job ads requesting programmers with 5 years experience programming in Go .
So this guys PhD students will all get jobs .
It 's a win win situation !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We all know next year there will be hundreds of job ads requesting programmers with 5 years experience programming in Go.
So this guys PhD students will all get jobs.
It's a win win situation!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071748</id>
	<title>Hmmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258037280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps Mr. McCabe should have trademarked the name???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps Mr. McCabe should have trademarked the name ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps Mr. McCabe should have trademarked the name??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30120522</id>
	<title>goo</title>
	<author>tisch</author>
	<datestamp>1258362060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>just call it "goo" and call it a day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>just call it " goo " and call it a day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just call it "goo" and call it a day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073316</id>
	<title>I agree...</title>
	<author>neowolf</author>
	<datestamp>1258044000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No trademark or copyright, and by all accounts- "Go!" is a dead project. "Go" makes sense because of the goal of developing a fast-compiling language, and it can also be seen as the first two letters of "Google" which makes some sense from a marketing standpoint. It say- Go for it Google!</htmltext>
<tokenext>No trademark or copyright , and by all accounts- " Go !
" is a dead project .
" Go " makes sense because of the goal of developing a fast-compiling language , and it can also be seen as the first two letters of " Google " which makes some sense from a marketing standpoint .
It say- Go for it Google !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No trademark or copyright, and by all accounts- "Go!
" is a dead project.
"Go" makes sense because of the goal of developing a fast-compiling language, and it can also be seen as the first two letters of "Google" which makes some sense from a marketing standpoint.
It say- Go for it Google!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072162</id>
	<title>Re:Google should rename Go to Issue 9</title>
	<author>Jugalator</author>
	<datestamp>1258039320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Especially with some guys behind this, also behind Plan 9.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Especially with some guys behind this , also behind Plan 9 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Especially with some guys behind this, also behind Plan 9.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071746</id>
	<title>Non-issue</title>
	<author>smitty777</author>
	<datestamp>1258037280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is this news?  Google was unaware that the name was taken.  I do think they'd be stupid to keep it, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this news ?
Google was unaware that the name was taken .
I do think they 'd be stupid to keep it , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this news?
Google was unaware that the name was taken.
I do think they'd be stupid to keep it, though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30091764</id>
	<title>He is a fool for wanting them to change their name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258106520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I'll tell you why.</p><p>Nothing to do with fairness. Nothing to do with his rights. Let's throw those off the table. They are outweighed in this case.</p><p>By what?</p><p>Well, first of all it's non commercial, so he ain't losing much money here.</p><p>INSTEAD HE SHOULD ASK THEM TO PLACE ON THEIR WEB PAGE AND MANUALS A DISCLAIMER</p><p>If the disclaimer said</p><p>The Google Go language has nothing to do with an earlier programming language of the same name developed by (CREDITS). You may read more about this language on<br>(INSERT URL)</p><p>He would get 100000x the hits to his site and sell many more books just from people clicking out of curiosity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I 'll tell you why.Nothing to do with fairness .
Nothing to do with his rights .
Let 's throw those off the table .
They are outweighed in this case.By what ? Well , first of all it 's non commercial , so he ai n't losing much money here.INSTEAD HE SHOULD ASK THEM TO PLACE ON THEIR WEB PAGE AND MANUALS A DISCLAIMERIf the disclaimer saidThe Google Go language has nothing to do with an earlier programming language of the same name developed by ( CREDITS ) .
You may read more about this language on ( INSERT URL ) He would get 100000x the hits to his site and sell many more books just from people clicking out of curiosity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I'll tell you why.Nothing to do with fairness.
Nothing to do with his rights.
Let's throw those off the table.
They are outweighed in this case.By what?Well, first of all it's non commercial, so he ain't losing much money here.INSTEAD HE SHOULD ASK THEM TO PLACE ON THEIR WEB PAGE AND MANUALS A DISCLAIMERIf the disclaimer saidThe Google Go language has nothing to do with an earlier programming language of the same name developed by (CREDITS).
You may read more about this language on(INSERT URL)He would get 100000x the hits to his site and sell many more books just from people clicking out of curiosity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076460</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>wiredlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1258054680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"It was earlier" it's inventor says so.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>it's even google search result two!"</p></div><p>Aye. Had to revert to ye dear ol' mother tongue for that rhyme eh.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" It was earlier " it 's inventor says so .
...it 's even google search result two ! " Aye .
Had to revert to ye dear ol ' mother tongue for that rhyme eh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It was earlier" it's inventor says so.
...it's even google search result two!"Aye.
Had to revert to ye dear ol' mother tongue for that rhyme eh.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073248</id>
	<title>Should have called it "Goo"</title>
	<author>Joce640k</author>
	<datestamp>1258043760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anything but "Go'<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Googling the word "go" was never going to have a happy ending for people looking for programming information.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anything but " Go ' ... Googling the word " go " was never going to have a happy ending for people looking for programming information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anything but "Go' ... Googling the word "go" was never going to have a happy ending for people looking for programming information.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076816</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>nschubach</author>
	<datestamp>1258055940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like ".GET Platform" better.</p><p>Then they can call this dialect G#.</p><p>(Disclaimer:  I have not looked into the language, nor compared it to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like " .GET Platform " better.Then they can call this dialect G # .
( Disclaimer : I have not looked into the language , nor compared it to .NET )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like ".GET Platform" better.Then they can call this dialect G#.
(Disclaimer:  I have not looked into the language, nor compared it to .NET)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076924</id>
	<title>Re:Google should rename Go to Issue 9</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258056360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would go along with Plan 9, which the stole the rabbit logo from.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would go along with Plan 9 , which the stole the rabbit logo from .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would go along with Plan 9, which the stole the rabbit logo from.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073832</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmm...</title>
	<author>Registered Coward v2</author>
	<datestamp>1258046460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Perhaps Mr. McCabe should have trademarked the name???</p></div><p>Simply <i>using</i> the name in a commercial capacity is enough to get an unregistered trademark. However, the problem is that he is not selling the Go! programming language. If it's not a commercial entity, then trademark doesn't apply.</p></div><p>I'm not sure why you think selling something is a pre-requisite for being able to trademark its name.  What is key is that you use the trademark  on an ongoing basis and are the first to use it in a particular field.(Amongst other things). Even if you freely give something away you can still trademark its name; all a trademark does is identify a particular product and prevents others with similar products from trading on your good  (or bad) name.  Google, for example gives away many services for free yet can still own the rights to Google as a servicemark or trademark; depending on whether you consider search a service or a good.</p><p>As for trademarking the name, using it should at least create an unregistered trademark which can prevent others from using it for similar products; at least in the areas where he trades.  Registering provides stronger legal protections but just because you do not register a name doesn't mean someone else can use it for a similar product in the same area where you do business.</p><p>All of the above assumes the name is unique enough to be considered trademarkable; which is a separate issue.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps Mr. McCabe should have trademarked the name ? ?
? Simply using the name in a commercial capacity is enough to get an unregistered trademark .
However , the problem is that he is not selling the Go !
programming language .
If it 's not a commercial entity , then trademark does n't apply.I 'm not sure why you think selling something is a pre-requisite for being able to trademark its name .
What is key is that you use the trademark on an ongoing basis and are the first to use it in a particular field .
( Amongst other things ) .
Even if you freely give something away you can still trademark its name ; all a trademark does is identify a particular product and prevents others with similar products from trading on your good ( or bad ) name .
Google , for example gives away many services for free yet can still own the rights to Google as a servicemark or trademark ; depending on whether you consider search a service or a good.As for trademarking the name , using it should at least create an unregistered trademark which can prevent others from using it for similar products ; at least in the areas where he trades .
Registering provides stronger legal protections but just because you do not register a name does n't mean someone else can use it for a similar product in the same area where you do business.All of the above assumes the name is unique enough to be considered trademarkable ; which is a separate issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps Mr. McCabe should have trademarked the name??
?Simply using the name in a commercial capacity is enough to get an unregistered trademark.
However, the problem is that he is not selling the Go!
programming language.
If it's not a commercial entity, then trademark doesn't apply.I'm not sure why you think selling something is a pre-requisite for being able to trademark its name.
What is key is that you use the trademark  on an ongoing basis and are the first to use it in a particular field.
(Amongst other things).
Even if you freely give something away you can still trademark its name; all a trademark does is identify a particular product and prevents others with similar products from trading on your good  (or bad) name.
Google, for example gives away many services for free yet can still own the rights to Google as a servicemark or trademark; depending on whether you consider search a service or a good.As for trademarking the name, using it should at least create an unregistered trademark which can prevent others from using it for similar products; at least in the areas where he trades.
Registering provides stronger legal protections but just because you do not register a name doesn't mean someone else can use it for a similar product in the same area where you do business.All of the above assumes the name is unique enough to be considered trademarkable; which is a separate issue.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077024</id>
	<title>C vs C# is a poor comparison</title>
	<author>Geof</author>
	<datestamp>1258056720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Everybody knows the difference between C and C#</p></div> </blockquote><p>Everyone also knows the similarity.  They are in some sense connected.  Technically you may argue that C is glorified assembly and C# is a modern OO language.  But there is a direct lineage I think from C through C++ and Java to C# as standard application development languages, each of which attempted to remedy some of the weaknesses of the previous one.</p><p>More importantly perhaps, no-one would confuse them because C is so well known.  The very popularity of C makes it easy to tweak the name just a bit and yet have the difference be universally recognized.  This simply isn't the case for lesser known names.  If I wrote a play titled <i>Romeo and Julia</i>, you would likely recognize both the reference to Shakespeare and realize that the name is different.  There would be no confusion.  If I picked a lesser-known title, however, you could well be confused.  Would you realize that <i>The Prisoner of Zendo</i> was different from <i>The Prisoner or Zenda</i>?  (Though <i>The Prisoner of Zenda</i> is hardly obscure.)</p><p>The lack of widespread knowledge of Go makes it particularly vulnerably to confusion with Go!  Also, Google has immensely marketing power sufficient to overwhelm recognition for Go.  How many participants in this discussion would have known the difference before today?  I certainly wouldn't.  If you named a language C', however, (assuming there is no such language already;  I picked the prime because it is visually almost unnoticeable), I would instantly recognize that it was not C.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everybody knows the difference between C and C # Everyone also knows the similarity .
They are in some sense connected .
Technically you may argue that C is glorified assembly and C # is a modern OO language .
But there is a direct lineage I think from C through C + + and Java to C # as standard application development languages , each of which attempted to remedy some of the weaknesses of the previous one.More importantly perhaps , no-one would confuse them because C is so well known .
The very popularity of C makes it easy to tweak the name just a bit and yet have the difference be universally recognized .
This simply is n't the case for lesser known names .
If I wrote a play titled Romeo and Julia , you would likely recognize both the reference to Shakespeare and realize that the name is different .
There would be no confusion .
If I picked a lesser-known title , however , you could well be confused .
Would you realize that The Prisoner of Zendo was different from The Prisoner or Zenda ?
( Though The Prisoner of Zenda is hardly obscure .
) The lack of widespread knowledge of Go makes it particularly vulnerably to confusion with Go !
Also , Google has immensely marketing power sufficient to overwhelm recognition for Go .
How many participants in this discussion would have known the difference before today ?
I certainly would n't .
If you named a language C ' , however , ( assuming there is no such language already ; I picked the prime because it is visually almost unnoticeable ) , I would instantly recognize that it was not C .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everybody knows the difference between C and C# Everyone also knows the similarity.
They are in some sense connected.
Technically you may argue that C is glorified assembly and C# is a modern OO language.
But there is a direct lineage I think from C through C++ and Java to C# as standard application development languages, each of which attempted to remedy some of the weaknesses of the previous one.More importantly perhaps, no-one would confuse them because C is so well known.
The very popularity of C makes it easy to tweak the name just a bit and yet have the difference be universally recognized.
This simply isn't the case for lesser known names.
If I wrote a play titled Romeo and Julia, you would likely recognize both the reference to Shakespeare and realize that the name is different.
There would be no confusion.
If I picked a lesser-known title, however, you could well be confused.
Would you realize that The Prisoner of Zendo was different from The Prisoner or Zenda?
(Though The Prisoner of Zenda is hardly obscure.
)The lack of widespread knowledge of Go makes it particularly vulnerably to confusion with Go!
Also, Google has immensely marketing power sufficient to overwhelm recognition for Go.
How many participants in this discussion would have known the difference before today?
I certainly wouldn't.
If you named a language C', however, (assuming there is no such language already;  I picked the prime because it is visually almost unnoticeable), I would instantly recognize that it was not C.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30085288</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>RivenAleem</author>
	<datestamp>1258116840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They should use the rest of the company name instead and call it "Ogle"</htmltext>
<tokenext>They should use the rest of the company name instead and call it " Ogle "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should use the rest of the company name instead and call it "Ogle"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077172</id>
	<title>Re:Go!</title>
	<author>CrashNBrn</author>
	<datestamp>1258057140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>yet this supposed "Go language" was so unknown that nobody ever bothered to make a page for it (until yesterday). And the name is a two letter word that cannot actually be googled and is as useless as "to" or "for" or "a" as a search term.</p></div></blockquote><p>
I don't disagree with most of what you say - but you <b>can</b> google "go" as well as "c" or "d". From that I would gather there are other valid single or double letter word searches.<br>
<br>
Of which, you can also google/search "for", though the results likely aren't that meaningful: 10,640,000,000 hits.<br>
Interestingly, Slashdot is #5: <br>
Slashdot - News <b>for</b> nerds, stuff that matters<br>
And for.com is #3.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>yet this supposed " Go language " was so unknown that nobody ever bothered to make a page for it ( until yesterday ) .
And the name is a two letter word that can not actually be googled and is as useless as " to " or " for " or " a " as a search term .
I do n't disagree with most of what you say - but you can google " go " as well as " c " or " d " .
From that I would gather there are other valid single or double letter word searches .
Of which , you can also google/search " for " , though the results likely are n't that meaningful : 10,640,000,000 hits .
Interestingly , Slashdot is # 5 : Slashdot - News for nerds , stuff that matters And for.com is # 3 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yet this supposed "Go language" was so unknown that nobody ever bothered to make a page for it (until yesterday).
And the name is a two letter word that cannot actually be googled and is as useless as "to" or "for" or "a" as a search term.
I don't disagree with most of what you say - but you can google "go" as well as "c" or "d".
From that I would gather there are other valid single or double letter word searches.
Of which, you can also google/search "for", though the results likely aren't that meaningful: 10,640,000,000 hits.
Interestingly, Slashdot is #5: 
Slashdot - News for nerds, stuff that matters
And for.com is #3.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075398</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078826
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_121</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_109</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30085870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_112</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30082464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073276
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_127</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077902
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073676
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_111</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30085192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_107</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_110</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_128</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30080848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_135</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30085288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_125</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_130</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30085132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30084818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_116</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30081184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078676
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30083112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30082422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30084132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_119</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30080472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_122</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_118</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_115</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30082652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30082594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_114</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077554
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30083556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30081838
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_129</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_120</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30079428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_134</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30080002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_108</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073616
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_113</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30084792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073534
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30081860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_126</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_133</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30083528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_132</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30084648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_123</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30086944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_106</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073022
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30080634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30079274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30080646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_124</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_131</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076708
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_1256234_117</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30084810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30082594
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30082652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078836
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076536
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073580
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072352
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072162
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073748
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071906
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072004
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30080634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077024
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074012
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073244
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072072
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072092
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072184
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073308
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30080646
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072250
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071960
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071884
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073232
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078538
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072740
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30084792
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074036
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072668
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076460
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072266
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074808
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078328
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071902
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071682
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072330
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076308
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30082422
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30083112
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076500
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073462
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30084648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072110
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075398
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077258
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078280
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077172
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30084818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071836
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072118
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30085870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071700
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072002
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077424
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072946
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30081860
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077622
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30084810
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30085132
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073780
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075974
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076750
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073534
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076816
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077522
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074758
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073400
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30080472
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30080848
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077914
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073954
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30085288
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077554
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073068
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076348
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30085192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072042
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073248
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078772
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071920
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071932
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074192
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071898
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072482
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071762
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073222
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072790
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072080
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30079428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071752
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072426
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074960
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30079274
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077540
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30078676
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30083556
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30080002
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30074492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077422
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30081184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30083528
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072036
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076590
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073832
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30084132
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073848
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30086944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30077902
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30081838
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072400
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073676
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30082464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071880
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30072006
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_1256234.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30071916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30073566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30075688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_1256234.30076530
</commentlist>
</conversation>
