<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_06_167239</id>
	<title>What Does Google Suggest Suggest About Humanity?<span class="vballoon-marquee rd\_5"><span>Comments:</span><a href="#">513</a></span></title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1257536400000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>CNETNate writes <i>"You'll laugh, but mostly you'll cry. Some of the questions Google <a href="http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49304156,00.htm">gets asked to deliver results for is beyond worrying</a>. 'Can you put peroxide in your ear?', 'Why would a pregnancy test be negative?', and 'Why can't I own a Canadian?' being just a selection of the truly baffling &mdash; and disturbing &mdash; questions Google is regularly forced to answer."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>CNETNate writes " You 'll laugh , but mostly you 'll cry .
Some of the questions Google gets asked to deliver results for is beyond worrying .
'Can you put peroxide in your ear ?
' , 'Why would a pregnancy test be negative ?
' , and 'Why ca n't I own a Canadian ?
' being just a selection of the truly baffling    and disturbing    questions Google is regularly forced to answer .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CNETNate writes "You'll laugh, but mostly you'll cry.
Some of the questions Google gets asked to deliver results for is beyond worrying.
'Can you put peroxide in your ear?
', 'Why would a pregnancy test be negative?
', and 'Why can't I own a Canadian?
' being just a selection of the truly baffling — and disturbing — questions Google is regularly forced to answer.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008776</id>
	<title>The obvious weakness...</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1257541080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of this piece is the same issue that plagues the "Dear God, look at Yahoo Answers, and weep for humanity" articles.<br> <br>

Obviously, the internet is, in fact, filled with fucktards; but it is also full of people searching for jokes, people trolling for the lulz, satire, google bombing, etc. Without reasonably solid statistics munching, you can't really say whether a given query is common because people are searching for it in seriousness, in jest, because they are mocking the people who were searching for it seriously, etc, etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of this piece is the same issue that plagues the " Dear God , look at Yahoo Answers , and weep for humanity " articles .
Obviously , the internet is , in fact , filled with fucktards ; but it is also full of people searching for jokes , people trolling for the lulz , satire , google bombing , etc .
Without reasonably solid statistics munching , you ca n't really say whether a given query is common because people are searching for it in seriousness , in jest , because they are mocking the people who were searching for it seriously , etc , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of this piece is the same issue that plagues the "Dear God, look at Yahoo Answers, and weep for humanity" articles.
Obviously, the internet is, in fact, filled with fucktards; but it is also full of people searching for jokes, people trolling for the lulz, satire, google bombing, etc.
Without reasonably solid statistics munching, you can't really say whether a given query is common because people are searching for it in seriousness, in jest, because they are mocking the people who were searching for it seriously, etc, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011142</id>
	<title>Re:Jesus</title>
	<author>Maelwryth</author>
	<datestamp>1257510360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"Everyone knows that Jesus was born to Mary after she immaculately conceived him by receiving God's seed somehow."</i> <br>Whilst simultaneously being of the line of David.........Work that one out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Everyone knows that Jesus was born to Mary after she immaculately conceived him by receiving God 's seed somehow .
" Whilst simultaneously being of the line of David.........Work that one out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Everyone knows that Jesus was born to Mary after she immaculately conceived him by receiving God's seed somehow.
" Whilst simultaneously being of the line of David.........Work that one out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008752</id>
	<title>or yahoo answers</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1257541080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://answers.yahoo.com/" title="yahoo.com">http://answers.yahoo.com/</a> [yahoo.com]</p><p>and the end all most awesome/ most depressing question ever asked there:</p><p>"how is babby formed, how girl get pragnent"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //answers.yahoo.com/ [ yahoo.com ] and the end all most awesome/ most depressing question ever asked there : " how is babby formed , how girl get pragnent "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://answers.yahoo.com/ [yahoo.com]and the end all most awesome/ most depressing question ever asked there:"how is babby formed, how girl get pragnent"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009128</id>
	<title>Follow the Rabbit Hole...</title>
	<author>pspahn</author>
	<datestamp>1257499440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So I tried a few of the searches myself, I wanted to see what these pages actually said.

After reading the article <a href="http://christwire.org/2009/08/why-cant-i-own-a-canadian/" title="christwire.org" rel="nofollow">here</a> [christwire.org], I found myself in a world of hilarity. The web is an interesting place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So I tried a few of the searches myself , I wanted to see what these pages actually said .
After reading the article here [ christwire.org ] , I found myself in a world of hilarity .
The web is an interesting place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I tried a few of the searches myself, I wanted to see what these pages actually said.
After reading the article here [christwire.org], I found myself in a world of hilarity.
The web is an interesting place.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009324</id>
	<title>Pool's Closed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257500220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>We typed:</b> 'Why can't...'<br>
<b>Google suggests:</b> '...black people swim?' <br>

<b>Answer:</b> Pool's Closed</htmltext>
<tokenext>We typed : 'Why ca n't... ' Google suggests : '...black people swim ?
' Answer : Pool 's Closed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We typed: 'Why can't...'
Google suggests: '...black people swim?
' 

Answer: Pool's Closed</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008892</id>
	<title>Not all so stupid</title>
	<author>GuyFawkes</author>
	<datestamp>1257498480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We typed: 'Why can't...'<br>Google suggests: '...black people swim?'</p><p>Answer: There is no answer to this question. It's demented to even ask it.</p><p>In fact, not quite so stupid, black people can swim, just not as well as white people, and it is all due to average density and skeleton formation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We typed : 'Why ca n't...'Google suggests : '...black people swim ?
'Answer : There is no answer to this question .
It 's demented to even ask it.In fact , not quite so stupid , black people can swim , just not as well as white people , and it is all due to average density and skeleton formation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We typed: 'Why can't...'Google suggests: '...black people swim?
'Answer: There is no answer to this question.
It's demented to even ask it.In fact, not quite so stupid, black people can swim, just not as well as white people, and it is all due to average density and skeleton formation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010354</id>
	<title>the greatest one I found is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257504900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..."Why are there school"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... " Why are there school "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..."Why are there school"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30019712</id>
	<title>Re:Many of these questions are legitimate</title>
	<author>tru3ntropy</author>
	<datestamp>1257623760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>
Can you put peroxide in your ear?</p><p>Actually, you can use it to remove earwax and to disinfect your ear if you went swimming in dirty water.  It's a perfectly safe, legitimate use.</p></div><p>Technically that may be true but it cant be a blanket response; what this person is likely asking is, is it safe for me to go and get the peroxide 20\% that my mum uses to bleach her hair and stick it in my ear?  A totally different question with i assume a different answer, whilst i don't know a lot bout chemistry i assume it is not safe to put something that bleaches hair into the sensitive ear canal.  I don't know why else some one would ask this question unless they wanted to know the long term effects of peroxide on the body.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Can you drink your own urine?</p><p>Again, a legitimate question.  In a desperate situation, drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions.  It's commonly mentioned in media.</p></div><p>Sure you can but why if you have an internet connection and are in mortal peril, are you not trying to get help instead of goggling a search that is only going to result in a heap of kinky porn?  Perhaps this is a more recreational search instead of for survival.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you put peroxide in your ear ? Actually , you can use it to remove earwax and to disinfect your ear if you went swimming in dirty water .
It 's a perfectly safe , legitimate use.Technically that may be true but it cant be a blanket response ; what this person is likely asking is , is it safe for me to go and get the peroxide 20 \ % that my mum uses to bleach her hair and stick it in my ear ?
A totally different question with i assume a different answer , whilst i do n't know a lot bout chemistry i assume it is not safe to put something that bleaches hair into the sensitive ear canal .
I do n't know why else some one would ask this question unless they wanted to know the long term effects of peroxide on the body.Can you drink your own urine ? Again , a legitimate question .
In a desperate situation , drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions .
It 's commonly mentioned in media.Sure you can but why if you have an internet connection and are in mortal peril , are you not trying to get help instead of goggling a search that is only going to result in a heap of kinky porn ?
Perhaps this is a more recreational search instead of for survival .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Can you put peroxide in your ear?Actually, you can use it to remove earwax and to disinfect your ear if you went swimming in dirty water.
It's a perfectly safe, legitimate use.Technically that may be true but it cant be a blanket response; what this person is likely asking is, is it safe for me to go and get the peroxide 20\% that my mum uses to bleach her hair and stick it in my ear?
A totally different question with i assume a different answer, whilst i don't know a lot bout chemistry i assume it is not safe to put something that bleaches hair into the sensitive ear canal.
I don't know why else some one would ask this question unless they wanted to know the long term effects of peroxide on the body.Can you drink your own urine?Again, a legitimate question.
In a desperate situation, drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions.
It's commonly mentioned in media.Sure you can but why if you have an internet connection and are in mortal peril, are you not trying to get help instead of goggling a search that is only going to result in a heap of kinky porn?
Perhaps this is a more recreational search instead of for survival.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30033826</id>
	<title>Define</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257786480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always see what people "define".  Type in "define" and the first suggestion is "define love".  The rest are usually interesting- during the 2008 elections, I got "define maverick", "define socialism", etc.  I've also see "define god" etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always see what people " define " .
Type in " define " and the first suggestion is " define love " .
The rest are usually interesting- during the 2008 elections , I got " define maverick " , " define socialism " , etc .
I 've also see " define god " etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always see what people "define".
Type in "define" and the first suggestion is "define love".
The rest are usually interesting- during the 2008 elections, I got "define maverick", "define socialism", etc.
I've also see "define god" etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010952</id>
	<title>Re:Given certain situations...</title>
	<author>Myrddin Wyllt</author>
	<datestamp>1257508860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> My Neurontin costs me $5 per month.</p></div><p>How uncivilised - <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NHS\_Wales" title="wikipedia.org">more enlghtened</a> [wikipedia.org] parts of the UK abolished prescription charges years ago:-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My Neurontin costs me $ 5 per month.How uncivilised - more enlghtened [ wikipedia.org ] parts of the UK abolished prescription charges years ago : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext> My Neurontin costs me $5 per month.How uncivilised - more enlghtened [wikipedia.org] parts of the UK abolished prescription charges years ago:-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009652</id>
	<title>Re:Jesus</title>
	<author>TeethWhitener</author>
	<datestamp>1257501720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shouldn't this be modded informative?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't this be modded informative ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't this be modded informative?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009946</id>
	<title>hmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257502920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>404 lulz not found..</p><p>I think the author thinks of himself as more humorous than he really is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>404 lulz not found..I think the author thinks of himself as more humorous than he really is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>404 lulz not found..I think the author thinks of himself as more humorous than he really is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010596</id>
	<title>On a related note</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1257506520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How does one patch KDE2 under FreeBSD?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How does one patch KDE2 under FreeBSD ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does one patch KDE2 under FreeBSD?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760</id>
	<title>Jesus</title>
	<author>Absolut187</author>
	<datestamp>1257541080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FTFA: "Why would a little girl in Yorkshire think Jesus was born in an egg?"</p><p>HAHA.  What a stupid little girl.  Everyone knows that Jesus was born to Mary after she immaculately conceived him by receiving God's seed somehow.</p><p>An egg.  LOL.<br>Moron.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FTFA : " Why would a little girl in Yorkshire think Jesus was born in an egg ? " HAHA .
What a stupid little girl .
Everyone knows that Jesus was born to Mary after she immaculately conceived him by receiving God 's seed somehow.An egg .
LOL.Moron .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTFA: "Why would a little girl in Yorkshire think Jesus was born in an egg?"HAHA.
What a stupid little girl.
Everyone knows that Jesus was born to Mary after she immaculately conceived him by receiving God's seed somehow.An egg.
LOL.Moron.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008504</id>
	<title>Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257540120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now my curiosity is piqued. WHY can't I own a Canadian? Or at least lease one for a year?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now my curiosity is piqued .
WHY ca n't I own a Canadian ?
Or at least lease one for a year ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now my curiosity is piqued.
WHY can't I own a Canadian?
Or at least lease one for a year?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009712</id>
	<title>google searches</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257501960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At Google there is this giant projection on a wall of random current searches, favourite query so far "my period is 2 months late, what is wrong?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At Google there is this giant projection on a wall of random current searches , favourite query so far " my period is 2 months late , what is wrong ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At Google there is this giant projection on a wall of random current searches, favourite query so far "my period is 2 months late, what is wrong?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008774</id>
	<title>I entered</title>
	<author>al0ha</author>
	<datestamp>1257541080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How can I nail...
<br>
<br>
I expected Google to suggest, "a hot chick." at minimum, but instead it suggested nothing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can I nail.. . I expected Google to suggest , " a hot chick .
" at minimum , but instead it suggested nothing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can I nail...


I expected Google to suggest, "a hot chick.
" at minimum, but instead it suggested nothing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010946</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257508800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Psychology isn't a science, therefore there is no scientific basis for your definition of "average intelligence". So in fact it is you that is technically wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Psychology is n't a science , therefore there is no scientific basis for your definition of " average intelligence " .
So in fact it is you that is technically wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Psychology isn't a science, therefore there is no scientific basis for your definition of "average intelligence".
So in fact it is you that is technically wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009404</id>
	<title>Re:Jesus</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257500640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> FTFA: "Why would a little girl in Yorkshire think Jesus was born in an egg?"</p> </div><p>Raptor Jesus meme has finally gone mainstream?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTFA : " Why would a little girl in Yorkshire think Jesus was born in an egg ?
" Raptor Jesus meme has finally gone mainstream ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> FTFA: "Why would a little girl in Yorkshire think Jesus was born in an egg?
" Raptor Jesus meme has finally gone mainstream?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009880</id>
	<title>Re:Why can't I own Canadians?</title>
	<author>cream wobbly</author>
	<datestamp>1257502620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, I get it. The breaking of families, inhumane conditions of travel, human trade, restrictions on marriage, severe physical punishment, lengthening of term on becoming pregnant, rape or sexual abuse, no access to legal recourse, mandatory religious conversion, isolation from society, child labor, are okay because America did it too and <em>"it's not slavery"</em>.</p><p>From the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indentured\_servant" title="wikipedia.org">Wikipedia article</a> [wikipedia.org]:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The large number of servants who ran away or committed suicide suggests that the conditions of life during the period of bondage may not have been so different for the servant and the slave.</p></div><p>Bloody Christian literalists.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , I get it .
The breaking of families , inhumane conditions of travel , human trade , restrictions on marriage , severe physical punishment , lengthening of term on becoming pregnant , rape or sexual abuse , no access to legal recourse , mandatory religious conversion , isolation from society , child labor , are okay because America did it too and " it 's not slavery " .From the Wikipedia article [ wikipedia.org ] : The large number of servants who ran away or committed suicide suggests that the conditions of life during the period of bondage may not have been so different for the servant and the slave.Bloody Christian literalists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, I get it.
The breaking of families, inhumane conditions of travel, human trade, restrictions on marriage, severe physical punishment, lengthening of term on becoming pregnant, rape or sexual abuse, no access to legal recourse, mandatory religious conversion, isolation from society, child labor, are okay because America did it too and "it's not slavery".From the Wikipedia article [wikipedia.org]:The large number of servants who ran away or committed suicide suggests that the conditions of life during the period of bondage may not have been so different for the servant and the slave.Bloody Christian literalists.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009702</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257501900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that."</p></div><p>That would be a median person.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Think of how stupid the average person is , and realize half of them are stupider than that .
" That would be a median person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
"That would be a median person.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009698</id>
	<title>Re:Jesus</title>
	<author>captjc</author>
	<datestamp>1257501900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe it was the great pastor William Renick had the Idea that if angels having wings they must, therefore, have feathers. In many faiths, Jesus would have been of the highest choir of angels and would have wings as well. If he had feathers, he would be part avian and part man. Avian species come from eggs. With this bit of logic I would say that Sweet Feathery Jesus was born in a egg.</p><p>Either that or he is one of those aliens from Ork that travel in a giant egg.</p><p>/ Shazbot!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe it was the great pastor William Renick had the Idea that if angels having wings they must , therefore , have feathers .
In many faiths , Jesus would have been of the highest choir of angels and would have wings as well .
If he had feathers , he would be part avian and part man .
Avian species come from eggs .
With this bit of logic I would say that Sweet Feathery Jesus was born in a egg.Either that or he is one of those aliens from Ork that travel in a giant egg./ Shazbot !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe it was the great pastor William Renick had the Idea that if angels having wings they must, therefore, have feathers.
In many faiths, Jesus would have been of the highest choir of angels and would have wings as well.
If he had feathers, he would be part avian and part man.
Avian species come from eggs.
With this bit of logic I would say that Sweet Feathery Jesus was born in a egg.Either that or he is one of those aliens from Ork that travel in a giant egg./ Shazbot!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008588</id>
	<title>Why can't I own Canadians?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257540420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lev .
25 : 44 states that I may indeed possess slaves , both male and female , provided they are purchased from neighboring nations .
A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans , but not Canadians .
Can you clarify ?
Why ca n't I own Canadians ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lev.
25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations.
A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians.
Can you clarify?
Why can't I own Canadians?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009638</id>
	<title>WTF</title>
	<author>Thyamine</author>
	<datestamp>1257501660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ok, I suppose I should have realized this is Idle so your results may vary, but I was hoping for some actually interestingly-strange questions.  What we got was a list of, yes, some strange questions, but then a bunch of not-strange questions that the author was trying to be funny about.  I don't know.  Did I miss something?  I actually spent time reading TFA thinking it was going to get funny.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , I suppose I should have realized this is Idle so your results may vary , but I was hoping for some actually interestingly-strange questions .
What we got was a list of , yes , some strange questions , but then a bunch of not-strange questions that the author was trying to be funny about .
I do n't know .
Did I miss something ?
I actually spent time reading TFA thinking it was going to get funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, I suppose I should have realized this is Idle so your results may vary, but I was hoping for some actually interestingly-strange questions.
What we got was a list of, yes, some strange questions, but then a bunch of not-strange questions that the author was trying to be funny about.
I don't know.
Did I miss something?
I actually spent time reading TFA thinking it was going to get funny.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009674</id>
	<title>I blocked 'Idle'</title>
	<author>MrMista\_B</author>
	<datestamp>1257501840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So why is this Digg shit showing up on the front page?</p><p>Serious question.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So why is this Digg shit showing up on the front page ? Serious question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So why is this Digg shit showing up on the front page?Serious question.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30013528</id>
	<title>Re:Jesus</title>
	<author>prichardson</author>
	<datestamp>1257597420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's a good one.  Thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a good one .
Thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a good one.
Thanks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008746</id>
	<title>My own contribution:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257541020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <b>Me:</b> <br>what is the</p><p> <b>Google:</b> <br>date today<br>meaning of life<br>population of Canada<br>name of bo and luke dukes 69 dodge charger in the tv series the dukes of hazzard<br>population of the world<br>sum of days in a week months in a year hours in a day<br>largest city in canada<br>canadian dollar worth<br>best laptop<br>capital of california</p><p>I don't know how their system works, but I don't think it's based on actual searches that people have done. I mean, how many people who google for the name of the Dukes' car would actually type a full sentence like that?</p><p>Another one I just tried:</p><p> <b>Me:</b> <br>what's worse than<br> <b>Google:</b> <br>a pile of dead babies</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Me : what is the Google : date todaymeaning of lifepopulation of Canadaname of bo and luke dukes 69 dodge charger in the tv series the dukes of hazzardpopulation of the worldsum of days in a week months in a year hours in a daylargest city in canadacanadian dollar worthbest laptopcapital of californiaI do n't know how their system works , but I do n't think it 's based on actual searches that people have done .
I mean , how many people who google for the name of the Dukes ' car would actually type a full sentence like that ? Another one I just tried : Me : what 's worse than Google : a pile of dead babies</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Me: what is the Google: date todaymeaning of lifepopulation of Canadaname of bo and luke dukes 69 dodge charger in the tv series the dukes of hazzardpopulation of the worldsum of days in a week months in a year hours in a daylargest city in canadacanadian dollar worthbest laptopcapital of californiaI don't know how their system works, but I don't think it's based on actual searches that people have done.
I mean, how many people who google for the name of the Dukes' car would actually type a full sentence like that?Another one I just tried: Me: what's worse than Google: a pile of dead babies</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30013596</id>
	<title>Re:Many of these questions are legitimate</title>
	<author>radio4fan</author>
	<datestamp>1257598560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the future, if you find thing going on around you which are puzzling or confusing, or even seem pointless or stupid, maybe you could consider whether they might be the result of another person's 'humour'.</p><p>The ability to detect humour is not something that everyone possesses, evidently.</p><p>And you missed:</p><p>Is it legal for a man in Scotland to marry his widow's sister?</p><p>No. The dead are forbidden to marry, even in Scotland.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the future , if you find thing going on around you which are puzzling or confusing , or even seem pointless or stupid , maybe you could consider whether they might be the result of another person 's 'humour'.The ability to detect humour is not something that everyone possesses , evidently.And you missed : Is it legal for a man in Scotland to marry his widow 's sister ? No .
The dead are forbidden to marry , even in Scotland .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the future, if you find thing going on around you which are puzzling or confusing, or even seem pointless or stupid, maybe you could consider whether they might be the result of another person's 'humour'.The ability to detect humour is not something that everyone possesses, evidently.And you missed:Is it legal for a man in Scotland to marry his widow's sister?No.
The dead are forbidden to marry, even in Scotland.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010440</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1257505440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Giving the range you are describing the label '"average" person' is nonsensical, and if you look at individuals and integrate across those individuals, by definition, the percentage of the population with a lower iq will be larger than 25\% (because the very bottom of the range has an iq that indicates 25\% of the population has a lower iq than they do, 25.249\% if you take the distribution too seriously).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Giving the range you are describing the label ' " average " person ' is nonsensical , and if you look at individuals and integrate across those individuals , by definition , the percentage of the population with a lower iq will be larger than 25 \ % ( because the very bottom of the range has an iq that indicates 25 \ % of the population has a lower iq than they do , 25.249 \ % if you take the distribution too seriously ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Giving the range you are describing the label '"average" person' is nonsensical, and if you look at individuals and integrate across those individuals, by definition, the percentage of the population with a lower iq will be larger than 25\% (because the very bottom of the range has an iq that indicates 25\% of the population has a lower iq than they do, 25.249\% if you take the distribution too seriously).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008910</id>
	<title>Why w...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257498600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why wont my parakeet eat my diarrhea</p><p>Ow... my head.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why wont my parakeet eat my diarrheaOw... my head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why wont my parakeet eat my diarrheaOw... my head.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009772</id>
	<title>Marrying Your Widow's Sister</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257502140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, the last batch of suggestions: is it legal for a Scotsman to marry his widow's sister?  Wouldn't that be kind of hard, you know, because he's DEAD? How else would he have a widow...?? (did the author's miss a joke?)</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , the last batch of suggestions : is it legal for a Scotsman to marry his widow 's sister ?
Would n't that be kind of hard , you know , because he 's DEAD ?
How else would he have a widow... ? ?
( did the author 's miss a joke ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, the last batch of suggestions: is it legal for a Scotsman to marry his widow's sister?
Wouldn't that be kind of hard, you know, because he's DEAD?
How else would he have a widow...??
(did the author's miss a joke?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008900</id>
	<title>Stupid to ask questions?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257498540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since when is it now laughable or stupid to ask questions to relieve oneself of ignorance? I'd say it's stupid to want to stay ignorant.</p><p>Basing your actions entirely on one or two less than credible sources might be stupid. I wouldn't put peroxide in my ear for instance without making sure I had plenty of credible sources to back that action. However asking the question on a search engine which might lead me to such credible sources is anything but stupid.</p><p>Whoever came up with this tripe is the one that's stupid. We don't need to praise willful ignorance, when knowledge is just a google query away...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when is it now laughable or stupid to ask questions to relieve oneself of ignorance ?
I 'd say it 's stupid to want to stay ignorant.Basing your actions entirely on one or two less than credible sources might be stupid .
I would n't put peroxide in my ear for instance without making sure I had plenty of credible sources to back that action .
However asking the question on a search engine which might lead me to such credible sources is anything but stupid.Whoever came up with this tripe is the one that 's stupid .
We do n't need to praise willful ignorance , when knowledge is just a google query away.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when is it now laughable or stupid to ask questions to relieve oneself of ignorance?
I'd say it's stupid to want to stay ignorant.Basing your actions entirely on one or two less than credible sources might be stupid.
I wouldn't put peroxide in my ear for instance without making sure I had plenty of credible sources to back that action.
However asking the question on a search engine which might lead me to such credible sources is anything but stupid.Whoever came up with this tripe is the one that's stupid.
We don't need to praise willful ignorance, when knowledge is just a google query away...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008992</id>
	<title>Re:Why can't I own Canadians?</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1257498900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The concept of "slavery" that the Israelites practiced was similar to indentured servitude in early US history; not similar to the slavery the Israelites endured in Egypt or africans endured here in America.  If you read leviticus all the way through you'll find that the "slaves"[sic] are to be set free and all debts released after a period of time (7 years IIRC), and also, every 50 years (the year of jubilee) all land should be returned to their original owners (so in effect land wasn't sold, but rather, leased).</p><p>So yes, you can have indentured servants (termed slaves in leviticus) but NOT slavery in terms of the horrible American slavery.</p><p>Having said that, you can't really enslave Canadians. After all, Canadians aren't really people!  *kidding, obviously*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The concept of " slavery " that the Israelites practiced was similar to indentured servitude in early US history ; not similar to the slavery the Israelites endured in Egypt or africans endured here in America .
If you read leviticus all the way through you 'll find that the " slaves " [ sic ] are to be set free and all debts released after a period of time ( 7 years IIRC ) , and also , every 50 years ( the year of jubilee ) all land should be returned to their original owners ( so in effect land was n't sold , but rather , leased ) .So yes , you can have indentured servants ( termed slaves in leviticus ) but NOT slavery in terms of the horrible American slavery.Having said that , you ca n't really enslave Canadians .
After all , Canadians are n't really people !
* kidding , obviously *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The concept of "slavery" that the Israelites practiced was similar to indentured servitude in early US history; not similar to the slavery the Israelites endured in Egypt or africans endured here in America.
If you read leviticus all the way through you'll find that the "slaves"[sic] are to be set free and all debts released after a period of time (7 years IIRC), and also, every 50 years (the year of jubilee) all land should be returned to their original owners (so in effect land wasn't sold, but rather, leased).So yes, you can have indentured servants (termed slaves in leviticus) but NOT slavery in terms of the horrible American slavery.Having said that, you can't really enslave Canadians.
After all, Canadians aren't really people!
*kidding, obviously*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008624</id>
	<title>Years ago ..</title>
	<author>OzPeter</author>
	<datestamp>1257540540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Juts for kicks I used to enter strings of random words into google just to see what sort of associations popped out<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. it made for minutes of harmless fun but it always produced interesting results.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Juts for kicks I used to enter strings of random words into google just to see what sort of associations popped out .. it made for minutes of harmless fun but it always produced interesting results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Juts for kicks I used to enter strings of random words into google just to see what sort of associations popped out .. it made for minutes of harmless fun but it always produced interesting results.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010814</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257507720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, but IQ has a normal distribution (by definition, actually), and it's clear from context that he's talking about a single person, NOT the range.</p><p>And the quote gets a lot less snappy if you talk about the person with "median intelligence."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but IQ has a normal distribution ( by definition , actually ) , and it 's clear from context that he 's talking about a single person , NOT the range.And the quote gets a lot less snappy if you talk about the person with " median intelligence .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but IQ has a normal distribution (by definition, actually), and it's clear from context that he's talking about a single person, NOT the range.And the quote gets a lot less snappy if you talk about the person with "median intelligence.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30063386</id>
	<title>what are and why is</title>
	<author>orgelspieler</author>
	<datestamp>1257104100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Two of the ones I tried seemed very bizarre at first, but when I actually followed the link, they made sense.<br>
What are<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... these strawberries doing on my nipples, I need them for my fruit salad<br>It's a book.<br>Why is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... there a dead pakistani on my couch<br>Something to do with "Lost."<br> <br>I would like to point out that going into labor is not very clear cut, and using peroxide in your ear is a common method to help loosen wax buildup. You can also gargle with it (peroxide, not ear wax).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Two of the ones I tried seemed very bizarre at first , but when I actually followed the link , they made sense .
What are ... these strawberries doing on my nipples , I need them for my fruit saladIt 's a book.Why is ... there a dead pakistani on my couchSomething to do with " Lost .
" I would like to point out that going into labor is not very clear cut , and using peroxide in your ear is a common method to help loosen wax buildup .
You can also gargle with it ( peroxide , not ear wax ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two of the ones I tried seemed very bizarre at first, but when I actually followed the link, they made sense.
What are ... these strawberries doing on my nipples, I need them for my fruit saladIt's a book.Why is ... there a dead pakistani on my couchSomething to do with "Lost.
" I would like to point out that going into labor is not very clear cut, and using peroxide in your ear is a common method to help loosen wax buildup.
You can also gargle with it (peroxide, not ear wax).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010746</id>
	<title>Re:Why can't I own Canadians?</title>
	<author>dontmakemethink</author>
	<datestamp>1257507360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can have the separatists, cheaper by the dozen!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can have the separatists , cheaper by the dozen !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can have the separatists, cheaper by the dozen!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009354</id>
	<title>Disturbing Search Requests</title>
	<author>John Jorsett</author>
	<datestamp>1257500340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>One of the sites I like to look at from time to time is a blog of webmasters who post some of the more bizarre search requests that have led people to their sites. A recent one: "masturbate with armor all".
<a href="http://www.disturbingsearchrequests.com/" title="disturbing...quests.com">http://www.disturbingsearchrequests.com/</a> [disturbing...quests.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the sites I like to look at from time to time is a blog of webmasters who post some of the more bizarre search requests that have led people to their sites .
A recent one : " masturbate with armor all " .
http : //www.disturbingsearchrequests.com/ [ disturbing...quests.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the sites I like to look at from time to time is a blog of webmasters who post some of the more bizarre search requests that have led people to their sites.
A recent one: "masturbate with armor all".
http://www.disturbingsearchrequests.com/ [disturbing...quests.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30012706</id>
	<title>uh...</title>
	<author>buddyglass</author>
	<datestamp>1257535020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I put peroxide in my ear.  Seriously.  It fizzes too, which means its eating up some organic matter.  Which makes me warm and happy inside.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I put peroxide in my ear .
Seriously. It fizzes too , which means its eating up some organic matter .
Which makes me warm and happy inside .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I put peroxide in my ear.
Seriously.  It fizzes too, which means its eating up some organic matter.
Which makes me warm and happy inside.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011766</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257517140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're pedantic, but still wrong. He didn't say "person of average intelligence", he said "the average person" -- a single person.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're pedantic , but still wrong .
He did n't say " person of average intelligence " , he said " the average person " -- a single person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're pedantic, but still wrong.
He didn't say "person of average intelligence", he said "the average person" -- a single person.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009140</id>
	<title>Given certain situations...</title>
	<author>Adustust</author>
	<datestamp>1257499440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google may be the only immediately available source of information someone can get to.  The author of this article obviously had nothing to do but sit and play with the suggestion feature and figured he could burn a work day with an article to justify how he wasn't actually wasting his time.

If someone is having problems with chest pains, you can imagine they are getting scared, but it's not like they know exactly what a heart attack is supposed to feel like so they don't want to take action in case they're wrong.  Someone who doesn't have insurance for example, should definitely check google for possible symptoms.  Obviously if the case were serious enough, you probably would just go to the hospital regardless.  However, many cases of heart attack patients actually turn out to be heartburn or acid reflux.

The same goes for the "Am I going into labor" question.  Instances of women getting pregnant is rare, but happens much more often than you'd think.  The experience of going into labor would be extremely frightening if you had not been expecting it or learning about it several months in advance.

The article seems to be written with an elitist point of view with no actual insight towards real world situations that would bring these searches about.  Granted, there are definitely some listed that are stupid, the author could have done a better job finding far, far better examples.  Like, "why is there a dead pakistani on my couch?"  Although, perhaps if there was one on my couch, I may ask the same question.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google may be the only immediately available source of information someone can get to .
The author of this article obviously had nothing to do but sit and play with the suggestion feature and figured he could burn a work day with an article to justify how he was n't actually wasting his time .
If someone is having problems with chest pains , you can imagine they are getting scared , but it 's not like they know exactly what a heart attack is supposed to feel like so they do n't want to take action in case they 're wrong .
Someone who does n't have insurance for example , should definitely check google for possible symptoms .
Obviously if the case were serious enough , you probably would just go to the hospital regardless .
However , many cases of heart attack patients actually turn out to be heartburn or acid reflux .
The same goes for the " Am I going into labor " question .
Instances of women getting pregnant is rare , but happens much more often than you 'd think .
The experience of going into labor would be extremely frightening if you had not been expecting it or learning about it several months in advance .
The article seems to be written with an elitist point of view with no actual insight towards real world situations that would bring these searches about .
Granted , there are definitely some listed that are stupid , the author could have done a better job finding far , far better examples .
Like , " why is there a dead pakistani on my couch ?
" Although , perhaps if there was one on my couch , I may ask the same question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google may be the only immediately available source of information someone can get to.
The author of this article obviously had nothing to do but sit and play with the suggestion feature and figured he could burn a work day with an article to justify how he wasn't actually wasting his time.
If someone is having problems with chest pains, you can imagine they are getting scared, but it's not like they know exactly what a heart attack is supposed to feel like so they don't want to take action in case they're wrong.
Someone who doesn't have insurance for example, should definitely check google for possible symptoms.
Obviously if the case were serious enough, you probably would just go to the hospital regardless.
However, many cases of heart attack patients actually turn out to be heartburn or acid reflux.
The same goes for the "Am I going into labor" question.
Instances of women getting pregnant is rare, but happens much more often than you'd think.
The experience of going into labor would be extremely frightening if you had not been expecting it or learning about it several months in advance.
The article seems to be written with an elitist point of view with no actual insight towards real world situations that would bring these searches about.
Granted, there are definitely some listed that are stupid, the author could have done a better job finding far, far better examples.
Like, "why is there a dead pakistani on my couch?
"  Although, perhaps if there was one on my couch, I may ask the same question.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30030406</id>
	<title>Same thing here</title>
	<author>dargaud</author>
	<datestamp>1257763140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A couple years ago while looking at my apache logs, I noticed some ridiculous searches. And indeed, after doing a quick grep "^who|^what|^when|^how" I was able to compile a <a href="http://www.gdargaud.net/Hack/Searches.html#Strange" title="gdargaud.net">pretty damning selection of searches</a> [gdargaud.net]. I should do it again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A couple years ago while looking at my apache logs , I noticed some ridiculous searches .
And indeed , after doing a quick grep " ^ who | ^ what | ^ when | ^ how " I was able to compile a pretty damning selection of searches [ gdargaud.net ] .
I should do it again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A couple years ago while looking at my apache logs, I noticed some ridiculous searches.
And indeed, after doing a quick grep "^who|^what|^when|^how" I was able to compile a pretty damning selection of searches [gdargaud.net].
I should do it again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011074</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257509940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Juggle the numbers and revise Carlin's choice of words all you want... you're still a stupid soft scientist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Juggle the numbers and revise Carlin 's choice of words all you want... you 're still a stupid soft scientist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Juggle the numbers and revise Carlin's choice of words all you want... you're still a stupid soft scientist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009426</id>
	<title>Re:Not all so stupid</title>
	<author>DaveV1.0</author>
	<datestamp>1257500700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, the reason many black people, or at least black Americans, can't swim is because they never learned how because many black people live in areas with few swimming pools, public or private. Inner city neighborhoods have a very high ratio of people to pools. Rural areas, especially poor rural areas, have few pools. The suburbs have many pools, but not so many black people. But, many of the black people in the suburbs know how to swim.</p><p>Also, because many older black people can't swim, they can not teach their children to swim, resulting in a need to pay for swimming classes which may be prohibitively expensive.</p><p>When I went into bootcamp for the Navy, we had small group of black guys who could swim before they joined. The rest had to learn while in bootcamp. All of them learned and learned well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the reason many black people , or at least black Americans , ca n't swim is because they never learned how because many black people live in areas with few swimming pools , public or private .
Inner city neighborhoods have a very high ratio of people to pools .
Rural areas , especially poor rural areas , have few pools .
The suburbs have many pools , but not so many black people .
But , many of the black people in the suburbs know how to swim.Also , because many older black people ca n't swim , they can not teach their children to swim , resulting in a need to pay for swimming classes which may be prohibitively expensive.When I went into bootcamp for the Navy , we had small group of black guys who could swim before they joined .
The rest had to learn while in bootcamp .
All of them learned and learned well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the reason many black people, or at least black Americans, can't swim is because they never learned how because many black people live in areas with few swimming pools, public or private.
Inner city neighborhoods have a very high ratio of people to pools.
Rural areas, especially poor rural areas, have few pools.
The suburbs have many pools, but not so many black people.
But, many of the black people in the suburbs know how to swim.Also, because many older black people can't swim, they can not teach their children to swim, resulting in a need to pay for swimming classes which may be prohibitively expensive.When I went into bootcamp for the Navy, we had small group of black guys who could swim before they joined.
The rest had to learn while in bootcamp.
All of them learned and learned well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011832</id>
	<title>Re:Many of these questions are legitimate</title>
	<author>obdulio1950</author>
	<datestamp>1257518220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Psilocibin, the psicoactive component of psicodelic mushrooms is excreted in the urine. So it is not uncomon to keep that urine for drinking when there are no mushrooms available.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Psilocibin , the psicoactive component of psicodelic mushrooms is excreted in the urine .
So it is not uncomon to keep that urine for drinking when there are no mushrooms available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Psilocibin, the psicoactive component of psicodelic mushrooms is excreted in the urine.
So it is not uncomon to keep that urine for drinking when there are no mushrooms available.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009402</id>
	<title>Re:Why can't I own Canadians?</title>
	<author>CannonballHead</author>
	<datestamp>1257500580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves</p></div><p>I know you're joking... but I'm curious: are you a Jew living in the land of Canaan?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lev .
25 : 44 states that I may indeed possess slavesI know you 're joking... but I 'm curious : are you a Jew living in the land of Canaan ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lev.
25:44 states that I may indeed possess slavesI know you're joking... but I'm curious: are you a Jew living in the land of Canaan?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010374</id>
	<title>Engineers are...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257505140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do yourself a favor and type "engineers are"<br>I'm still laughing.  Also, this may have become my new hobby.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do yourself a favor and type " engineers are " I 'm still laughing .
Also , this may have become my new hobby .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do yourself a favor and type "engineers are"I'm still laughing.
Also, this may have become my new hobby.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30012026</id>
	<title>What does google suggest about the state of cnet?</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1257520680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>cnet is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p><p>Google suggests: <b>cnet is down</b> </p><p>google is.....</p><p>google is going to takeover the world<br>
google is skynet<br>
google is your friend<br>
google is watching you<br>
google is hiring at home workers<br>
google is making us stupid<br>
google is a number<br>
google is broken</p><p>
Other fun things to try:   <b>windows is...</b>   (Hint:  the first suggestion is an error message)
</p><p>
  <b>vista is....</b>    (first suggestion is  slow)
</p><p>
  <b>windows 7 is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</b>
</p><p>
  linux is..... <br>
  linux is better than windows<br>
  linux is distributed by several different  companies whose versions of linux are sometimes called<br>
  linux is illegal<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>
I suppose google suggest is not to be trusted (EG)
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>cnet is ....Google suggests : cnet is down google is.....google is going to takeover the world google is skynet google is your friend google is watching you google is hiring at home workers google is making us stupid google is a number google is broken Other fun things to try : windows is... ( Hint : the first suggestion is an error message ) vista is.... ( first suggestion is slow ) windows 7 is .. . linux is.... . linux is better than windows linux is distributed by several different companies whose versions of linux are sometimes called linux is illegal .. . I suppose google suggest is not to be trusted ( EG )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>cnet is ....Google suggests: cnet is down google is.....google is going to takeover the world
google is skynet
google is your friend
google is watching you
google is hiring at home workers
google is making us stupid
google is a number
google is broken
Other fun things to try:   windows is...   (Hint:  the first suggestion is an error message)

  vista is....    (first suggestion is  slow)

  windows 7 is ...

  linux is..... 
  linux is better than windows
  linux is distributed by several different  companies whose versions of linux are sometimes called
  linux is illegal ...
I suppose google suggest is not to be trusted (EG)
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30020802</id>
	<title>Re:My own contribution:</title>
	<author>Geminii</author>
	<datestamp>1257688200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <b>I'm feeling lucky:</b> <br>
having to shift the pile with a pitchfork</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm feeling lucky : having to shift the pile with a pitchfork</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I'm feeling lucky: 
having to shift the pile with a pitchfork</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011986</id>
	<title>What it suggests for me:</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1257520260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>humanity is...</p><p>
<b>humanity is the devil</b> <br>
humanity is a virus<br>
humanity is overrated<br>
humanity is doomed<br>
humanity is the devil lyrics<br>
<b>humanity is a parade of fools</b> <br>
humanity is the devil blogspot<br>
humanity is <b>a cancer</b> <br>
humanity is an ocean<br>
humanity is good</p><p>
humans are<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>
   humans are dead<br>
   humans are dead lyrics<br>
   humans are aliens<br>
   humans are omnivores<br>
   humans are a virus<br>
   humans are inherently evil<br>
   humans are apes<br>
   humans are mammals<br>
   humans are carnivores<br>
   humans are herbivores</p><p> to be human<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... <br>
to be human is to err</p><p>mankind is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p><p>
mankind is obsolete<br>
mankind is no island<br>
mankind is your mask<br>
mankind is obsolete lyrics<br>
mankind is obsolete torrent<br>
mankind is your mask achievement<br>
mankind is my business<br>
mankind is <b>doomed</b> <br>
mankind is obsolete myspace</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>humanity is.. . humanity is the devil humanity is a virus humanity is overrated humanity is doomed humanity is the devil lyrics humanity is a parade of fools humanity is the devil blogspot humanity is a cancer humanity is an ocean humanity is good humans are .. . humans are dead humans are dead lyrics humans are aliens humans are omnivores humans are a virus humans are inherently evil humans are apes humans are mammals humans are carnivores humans are herbivores to be human ... . to be human is to errmankind is ... . mankind is obsolete mankind is no island mankind is your mask mankind is obsolete lyrics mankind is obsolete torrent mankind is your mask achievement mankind is my business mankind is doomed mankind is obsolete myspace</tokentext>
<sentencetext>humanity is...
humanity is the devil 
humanity is a virus
humanity is overrated
humanity is doomed
humanity is the devil lyrics
humanity is a parade of fools 
humanity is the devil blogspot
humanity is a cancer 
humanity is an ocean
humanity is good
humans are ...
   humans are dead
   humans are dead lyrics
   humans are aliens
   humans are omnivores
   humans are a virus
   humans are inherently evil
   humans are apes
   humans are mammals
   humans are carnivores
   humans are herbivores to be human .... 
to be human is to errmankind is ....
mankind is obsolete
mankind is no island
mankind is your mask
mankind is obsolete lyrics
mankind is obsolete torrent
mankind is your mask achievement
mankind is my business
mankind is doomed 
mankind is obsolete myspace</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009864</id>
	<title>Re:Given certain situations...</title>
	<author>WeirdJohn</author>
	<datestamp>1257502560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the question was asked by someone in the UK this would not be the case.  In civilised countries access to health care is not predicated on wealth.  I get neurosurgery 4 times a year and it costs me nothing.  I stay in hospital at least 3 weeks a year in addition to this and it costs me nothing.  My monthly visits to my GP cost me nothing.  My Neurontin costs me $5 per month.  I have no health insurance other than that which I am guaranteed by being a citizen of a humane society.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the question was asked by someone in the UK this would not be the case .
In civilised countries access to health care is not predicated on wealth .
I get neurosurgery 4 times a year and it costs me nothing .
I stay in hospital at least 3 weeks a year in addition to this and it costs me nothing .
My monthly visits to my GP cost me nothing .
My Neurontin costs me $ 5 per month .
I have no health insurance other than that which I am guaranteed by being a citizen of a humane society .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the question was asked by someone in the UK this would not be the case.
In civilised countries access to health care is not predicated on wealth.
I get neurosurgery 4 times a year and it costs me nothing.
I stay in hospital at least 3 weeks a year in addition to this and it costs me nothing.
My monthly visits to my GP cost me nothing.
My Neurontin costs me $5 per month.
I have no health insurance other than that which I am guaranteed by being a citizen of a humane society.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009646</id>
	<title>A medical strudent I knew once defined...</title>
	<author>Marko DeBeeste</author>
	<datestamp>1257501660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... a proctoscope as a tube with an a$$hole on each end. It's applicable to the process that created this article</htmltext>
<tokenext>... a proctoscope as a tube with an a $ $ hole on each end .
It 's applicable to the process that created this article</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... a proctoscope as a tube with an a$$hole on each end.
It's applicable to the process that created this article</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010150</id>
	<title>Re:Why can't I own Canadians?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257503880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can rent Mexicans from the Home Depot.  I've never seen any Canadians for lease there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can rent Mexicans from the Home Depot .
I 've never seen any Canadians for lease there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can rent Mexicans from the Home Depot.
I've never seen any Canadians for lease there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009596</id>
	<title>Working as planned?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257501420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Although the article seems to suggest we are all complete idiots, it does highlight something that the author was too stupid to pick up on (or simply chose to ignore).</p><p>These are all questions that might be embarrassing to ask another human. It is far easier to ask a non-judgmental computer such questions then run the risk of humiliation by one's peers.</p><p>As a tool designed to provide knowledge, it does precisely that, and does so without ignoring those "grey areas"...subjects that might be socially taboo or something to that effect.</p><p>In short, it answers questions that otherwise might not even be asked due to social pressures.</p><p>Sure, some of us are stupid, but the real problem is that the rest are judgmental jerks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Although the article seems to suggest we are all complete idiots , it does highlight something that the author was too stupid to pick up on ( or simply chose to ignore ) .These are all questions that might be embarrassing to ask another human .
It is far easier to ask a non-judgmental computer such questions then run the risk of humiliation by one 's peers.As a tool designed to provide knowledge , it does precisely that , and does so without ignoring those " grey areas " ...subjects that might be socially taboo or something to that effect.In short , it answers questions that otherwise might not even be asked due to social pressures.Sure , some of us are stupid , but the real problem is that the rest are judgmental jerks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although the article seems to suggest we are all complete idiots, it does highlight something that the author was too stupid to pick up on (or simply chose to ignore).These are all questions that might be embarrassing to ask another human.
It is far easier to ask a non-judgmental computer such questions then run the risk of humiliation by one's peers.As a tool designed to provide knowledge, it does precisely that, and does so without ignoring those "grey areas"...subjects that might be socially taboo or something to that effect.In short, it answers questions that otherwise might not even be asked due to social pressures.Sure, some of us are stupid, but the real problem is that the rest are judgmental jerks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010650</id>
	<title>Re:Jesus</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1257506820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you type in "why is" one of the first suggestions is "why is there a dead Pakistani on my couch?"</p><p>I just poked my head in the living room.  It's actually a pretty good question.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you type in " why is " one of the first suggestions is " why is there a dead Pakistani on my couch ?
" I just poked my head in the living room .
It 's actually a pretty good question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you type in "why is" one of the first suggestions is "why is there a dead Pakistani on my couch?
"I just poked my head in the living room.
It's actually a pretty good question.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30018238</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257602700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought that was JR "Bob" Dobbs who said that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought that was JR " Bob " Dobbs who said that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought that was JR "Bob" Dobbs who said that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009018</id>
	<title>seems obvious to me</title>
	<author>FudRucker</author>
	<datestamp>1257498960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://imgur.com/zug1R.jpg" title="imgur.com">http://imgur.com/zug1R.jpg</a> [imgur.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //imgur.com/zug1R.jpg [ imgur.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://imgur.com/zug1R.jpg [imgur.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30012046</id>
	<title>Is Lady Gaga a hermaphrodite?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257521220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a legitimate question. I saw the VMAs. All I'm saying is if they could hide that many blood packs in her costume, they cold hide a dick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a legitimate question .
I saw the VMAs .
All I 'm saying is if they could hide that many blood packs in her costume , they cold hide a dick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a legitimate question.
I saw the VMAs.
All I'm saying is if they could hide that many blood packs in her costume, they cold hide a dick.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009204</id>
	<title>This one is the worst</title>
	<author>Explodicle</author>
	<datestamp>1257499680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i> <b>We typed:</b> 'Am I going...'<br>
<b>Google suggests:</b> '...into labour?' <br>
<b>Answer:</b> There's an easy and reliable way to test. Is there a brand-new human poking out of your lower body? If yes, then congratulations, you're going into labour. More accurately, you're already in it.</i> <br> <br>
I'm amazed that these guys make fun of a question, act like wiseasses who know the answer, yet <i>did not read the results of the search</i>! The early stages of labor can start DAYS before birth, and false labor is very common.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We typed : 'Am I going... ' Google suggests : '...into labour ?
' Answer : There 's an easy and reliable way to test .
Is there a brand-new human poking out of your lower body ?
If yes , then congratulations , you 're going into labour .
More accurately , you 're already in it .
I 'm amazed that these guys make fun of a question , act like wiseasses who know the answer , yet did not read the results of the search !
The early stages of labor can start DAYS before birth , and false labor is very common .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> We typed: 'Am I going...'
Google suggests: '...into labour?
' 
Answer: There's an easy and reliable way to test.
Is there a brand-new human poking out of your lower body?
If yes, then congratulations, you're going into labour.
More accurately, you're already in it.
I'm amazed that these guys make fun of a question, act like wiseasses who know the answer, yet did not read the results of the search!
The early stages of labor can start DAYS before birth, and false labor is very common.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008990</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257498900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems like slashdot is becoming a place for morons to post all kinds of stuff here!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems like slashdot is becoming a place for morons to post all kinds of stuff here ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems like slashdot is becoming a place for morons to post all kinds of stuff here!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009308</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>Znork</author>
	<datestamp>1257500160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Frankly, I'm disappointed that 'diy' doesn't seem to suggest 'surgery' in the top list. The results of that query I think says more about humanity than google suggests suggestions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Frankly , I 'm disappointed that 'diy ' does n't seem to suggest 'surgery ' in the top list .
The results of that query I think says more about humanity than google suggests suggestions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frankly, I'm disappointed that 'diy' doesn't seem to suggest 'surgery' in the top list.
The results of that query I think says more about humanity than google suggests suggestions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010812</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>dontmakemethink</author>
	<datestamp>1257507720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really?  Only half?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
Only half ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
Only half?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30014082</id>
	<title>Re:Many of these questions are legitimate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257606180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Can you drink your own urine?</p><p>Again, a legitimate question.  In a desperate situation, drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions.  It's commonly mentioned in media.</p></div><p>There are even some more or less credible schools of homeopathy that say drinking your own urine can keep you healthy. Under the provisions first you don't have any bladder or kidney infections and second you are still taking your recommended water intake every day. And the urine deosn't count for water intake.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you drink your own urine ? Again , a legitimate question .
In a desperate situation , drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions .
It 's commonly mentioned in media.There are even some more or less credible schools of homeopathy that say drinking your own urine can keep you healthy .
Under the provisions first you do n't have any bladder or kidney infections and second you are still taking your recommended water intake every day .
And the urine deos n't count for water intake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you drink your own urine?Again, a legitimate question.
In a desperate situation, drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions.
It's commonly mentioned in media.There are even some more or less credible schools of homeopathy that say drinking your own urine can keep you healthy.
Under the provisions first you don't have any bladder or kidney infections and second you are still taking your recommended water intake every day.
And the urine deosn't count for water intake.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009942</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>dogmatixpsych</author>
	<datestamp>1257502920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know that quote is humorous but it is technically wrong. "Average" intelligence extends +/- 10 points the mean IQ score (set at 100, with a standard deviation of 15) - although, there are people who consider average to be +/- 20 IQ points. In any case, 50-68\% (or even higher) of people have "average" IQ (intelligence).<br> <br>
This means that the "average" person only has a maximum of 25\% of the population with a lower IQ. I know that's technical but when we (psychologists) talk about average intelligence, average != the mean. Average is a range.<br> <br>
Okay, I'm done being pedantic.</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know that quote is humorous but it is technically wrong .
" Average " intelligence extends + /- 10 points the mean IQ score ( set at 100 , with a standard deviation of 15 ) - although , there are people who consider average to be + /- 20 IQ points .
In any case , 50-68 \ % ( or even higher ) of people have " average " IQ ( intelligence ) .
This means that the " average " person only has a maximum of 25 \ % of the population with a lower IQ .
I know that 's technical but when we ( psychologists ) talk about average intelligence , average ! = the mean .
Average is a range .
Okay , I 'm done being pedantic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know that quote is humorous but it is technically wrong.
"Average" intelligence extends +/- 10 points the mean IQ score (set at 100, with a standard deviation of 15) - although, there are people who consider average to be +/- 20 IQ points.
In any case, 50-68\% (or even higher) of people have "average" IQ (intelligence).
This means that the "average" person only has a maximum of 25\% of the population with a lower IQ.
I know that's technical but when we (psychologists) talk about average intelligence, average != the mean.
Average is a range.
Okay, I'm done being pedantic.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009610</id>
	<title>Re:Many of these questions are legitimate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257501480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Can two women make a baby?</p><p>Yes, it's possible with newly developed technology to create sperm from stem cells.  However, it has never been demonstrated in humans and may be quite unsafe.</p></div><p>God creates dinosaurs. God destroys dinosaurs. God creates man. Man destroys God. Man creates dinosaurs. Dinosaurs eat man. Woman inherits the Earth.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can two women make a baby ? Yes , it 's possible with newly developed technology to create sperm from stem cells .
However , it has never been demonstrated in humans and may be quite unsafe.God creates dinosaurs .
God destroys dinosaurs .
God creates man .
Man destroys God .
Man creates dinosaurs .
Dinosaurs eat man .
Woman inherits the Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can two women make a baby?Yes, it's possible with newly developed technology to create sperm from stem cells.
However, it has never been demonstrated in humans and may be quite unsafe.God creates dinosaurs.
God destroys dinosaurs.
God creates man.
Man destroys God.
Man creates dinosaurs.
Dinosaurs eat man.
Woman inherits the Earth.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30014796</id>
	<title>Re:Why can't I own Canadians?</title>
	<author>jc42</author>
	<datestamp>1257616080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><blockquote><div><p>The large number of servants who ran away or committed suicide suggests that the conditions of life during the period of bondage may not have been so different for the servant and the slave.</p></div></blockquote><p>Bloody Christian literalists.</p></div></blockquote><p>We should note that the Bible wasn't written in English; the relevant passages were in classical Hebrew.  There was a single word in that language, usually transliterated "'eved" (pl. "'avadim") that has been variously translated as "servant" or "slave", often in neighboring passages. There seems to be no clear reason why a particular translation was used in each instance.</p><p>It's just another example of the difficulties in translating languages, because categories like these often don't quite line up.</p><p>Of course, to a lot of American Christian literalists, the "original" bible was the one written in the English of the early 17th century. But they do still have some competition from the folks who insist that the original bible was the 1534 version written in German.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The large number of servants who ran away or committed suicide suggests that the conditions of life during the period of bondage may not have been so different for the servant and the slave.Bloody Christian literalists.We should note that the Bible was n't written in English ; the relevant passages were in classical Hebrew .
There was a single word in that language , usually transliterated " 'eved " ( pl .
" 'avadim " ) that has been variously translated as " servant " or " slave " , often in neighboring passages .
There seems to be no clear reason why a particular translation was used in each instance.It 's just another example of the difficulties in translating languages , because categories like these often do n't quite line up.Of course , to a lot of American Christian literalists , the " original " bible was the one written in the English of the early 17th century .
But they do still have some competition from the folks who insist that the original bible was the 1534 version written in German .
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The large number of servants who ran away or committed suicide suggests that the conditions of life during the period of bondage may not have been so different for the servant and the slave.Bloody Christian literalists.We should note that the Bible wasn't written in English; the relevant passages were in classical Hebrew.
There was a single word in that language, usually transliterated "'eved" (pl.
"'avadim") that has been variously translated as "servant" or "slave", often in neighboring passages.
There seems to be no clear reason why a particular translation was used in each instance.It's just another example of the difficulties in translating languages, because categories like these often don't quite line up.Of course, to a lot of American Christian literalists, the "original" bible was the one written in the English of the early 17th century.
But they do still have some competition from the folks who insist that the original bible was the 1534 version written in German.
;-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008496</id>
	<title>Your official guide to the Jigaboo presidency</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257540060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congratulations on your purchase of a brand new nigger! If handled properly, your apeman will give years of valuable, if reluctant, service.</p><p>INSTALLING YOUR NIGGER.<br>You should install your nigger differently according to whether you have purchased the field or house model. Field niggers work best in a serial configuration, i.e. chained together. Chain your nigger to another nigger immediately after unpacking it, and don't even think about taking that chain off, ever. Many niggers start singing as soon as you put a chain on them. This habit can usually be thrashed out of them if nipped in the bud. House niggers work best as standalone units, but should be hobbled or hamstrung to prevent attempts at escape. At this stage, your nigger can also be given a name. Most owners use the same names over and over, since niggers become confused by too much data. Rufus, Rastus, Remus, Toby, Carslisle, Carlton, Hey-You!-Yes-you!, Yeller, Blackstar, and Sambo are all effective names for your new buck nigger. If your nigger is a ho, it should be called Latrelle, L'Tanya, or Jemima. Some owners call their nigger hoes Latrine for a joke. Pearl, Blossom, and Ivory are also righteous names for nigger hoes. These names go straight over your nigger's head, by the way.</p><p>CONFIGURING YOUR NIGGER<br>Owing to a design error, your nigger comes equipped with a tongue and vocal chords. Most niggers can master only a few basic human phrases with this apparatus - "muh dick" being the most popular. However, others make barking, yelping, yapping noises and appear to be in some pain, so you should probably call a vet and have him remove your nigger's tongue. Once de-tongued your nigger will be a lot happier - at least, you won't hear it complaining anywhere near as much. Niggers have nothing interesting to say, anyway. Many owners also castrate their niggers for health reasons (yours, mine, and that of women, not the nigger's). This is strongly recommended, and frankly, it's a mystery why this is not done on the boat</p><p>HOUSING YOUR NIGGER.<br>Your nigger can be accommodated in cages with stout iron bars. Make sure, however, that the bars are wide enough to push pieces of nigger food through. The rule of thumb is, four niggers per square yard of cage. So a fifteen foot by thirty foot nigger cage can accommodate two hundred niggers. You can site a nigger cage anywhere, even on soft ground. Don't worry about your nigger fashioning makeshift shovels out of odd pieces of wood and digging an escape tunnel under the bars of the cage. Niggers never invented the shovel before and they're not about to now. In any case, your nigger is certainly too lazy to attempt escape. As long as the free food holds out, your nigger is living better than it did in Africa, so it will stay put. Buck niggers and hoe niggers can be safely accommodated in the same cage, as bucks never attempt sex with black hoes.</p><p>FEEDING YOUR NIGGER.<br>Your Nigger likes fried chicken, corn bread, and watermelon. You should therefore give it none of these things because its lazy ass almost certainly doesn't deserve it. Instead, feed it on porridge with salt, and creek water. Your nigger will supplement its diet with whatever it finds in the fields, other niggers, etc. Experienced nigger owners sometimes push watermelon slices through the bars of the nigger cage at the end of the day as a treat, but only if all niggers have worked well and nothing has been stolen that day. Mike of the Old Ranch Plantation reports that this last one is a killer, since all niggers steal something almost every single day of their lives. He reports he doesn't have to spend much on free watermelon for his niggers as a result. You should never allow your nigger meal breaks while at work, since if it stops work for more than ten minutes it will need to be retrained. You would be surprised how long it takes to teach a nigger to pick cotton. You really would. Coffee beans? Don't ask. You have no idea.</p><p>MAKING YOUR NIGGER WORK.<br>Niggers are very, very averse to work of any kind. The nigger's most</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations on your purchase of a brand new nigger !
If handled properly , your apeman will give years of valuable , if reluctant , service.INSTALLING YOUR NIGGER.You should install your nigger differently according to whether you have purchased the field or house model .
Field niggers work best in a serial configuration , i.e .
chained together .
Chain your nigger to another nigger immediately after unpacking it , and do n't even think about taking that chain off , ever .
Many niggers start singing as soon as you put a chain on them .
This habit can usually be thrashed out of them if nipped in the bud .
House niggers work best as standalone units , but should be hobbled or hamstrung to prevent attempts at escape .
At this stage , your nigger can also be given a name .
Most owners use the same names over and over , since niggers become confused by too much data .
Rufus , Rastus , Remus , Toby , Carslisle , Carlton , Hey-You ! -Yes-you ! , Yeller , Blackstar , and Sambo are all effective names for your new buck nigger .
If your nigger is a ho , it should be called Latrelle , L'Tanya , or Jemima .
Some owners call their nigger hoes Latrine for a joke .
Pearl , Blossom , and Ivory are also righteous names for nigger hoes .
These names go straight over your nigger 's head , by the way.CONFIGURING YOUR NIGGEROwing to a design error , your nigger comes equipped with a tongue and vocal chords .
Most niggers can master only a few basic human phrases with this apparatus - " muh dick " being the most popular .
However , others make barking , yelping , yapping noises and appear to be in some pain , so you should probably call a vet and have him remove your nigger 's tongue .
Once de-tongued your nigger will be a lot happier - at least , you wo n't hear it complaining anywhere near as much .
Niggers have nothing interesting to say , anyway .
Many owners also castrate their niggers for health reasons ( yours , mine , and that of women , not the nigger 's ) .
This is strongly recommended , and frankly , it 's a mystery why this is not done on the boatHOUSING YOUR NIGGER.Your nigger can be accommodated in cages with stout iron bars .
Make sure , however , that the bars are wide enough to push pieces of nigger food through .
The rule of thumb is , four niggers per square yard of cage .
So a fifteen foot by thirty foot nigger cage can accommodate two hundred niggers .
You can site a nigger cage anywhere , even on soft ground .
Do n't worry about your nigger fashioning makeshift shovels out of odd pieces of wood and digging an escape tunnel under the bars of the cage .
Niggers never invented the shovel before and they 're not about to now .
In any case , your nigger is certainly too lazy to attempt escape .
As long as the free food holds out , your nigger is living better than it did in Africa , so it will stay put .
Buck niggers and hoe niggers can be safely accommodated in the same cage , as bucks never attempt sex with black hoes.FEEDING YOUR NIGGER.Your Nigger likes fried chicken , corn bread , and watermelon .
You should therefore give it none of these things because its lazy ass almost certainly does n't deserve it .
Instead , feed it on porridge with salt , and creek water .
Your nigger will supplement its diet with whatever it finds in the fields , other niggers , etc .
Experienced nigger owners sometimes push watermelon slices through the bars of the nigger cage at the end of the day as a treat , but only if all niggers have worked well and nothing has been stolen that day .
Mike of the Old Ranch Plantation reports that this last one is a killer , since all niggers steal something almost every single day of their lives .
He reports he does n't have to spend much on free watermelon for his niggers as a result .
You should never allow your nigger meal breaks while at work , since if it stops work for more than ten minutes it will need to be retrained .
You would be surprised how long it takes to teach a nigger to pick cotton .
You really would .
Coffee beans ?
Do n't ask .
You have no idea.MAKING YOUR NIGGER WORK.Niggers are very , very averse to work of any kind .
The nigger 's most</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations on your purchase of a brand new nigger!
If handled properly, your apeman will give years of valuable, if reluctant, service.INSTALLING YOUR NIGGER.You should install your nigger differently according to whether you have purchased the field or house model.
Field niggers work best in a serial configuration, i.e.
chained together.
Chain your nigger to another nigger immediately after unpacking it, and don't even think about taking that chain off, ever.
Many niggers start singing as soon as you put a chain on them.
This habit can usually be thrashed out of them if nipped in the bud.
House niggers work best as standalone units, but should be hobbled or hamstrung to prevent attempts at escape.
At this stage, your nigger can also be given a name.
Most owners use the same names over and over, since niggers become confused by too much data.
Rufus, Rastus, Remus, Toby, Carslisle, Carlton, Hey-You!-Yes-you!, Yeller, Blackstar, and Sambo are all effective names for your new buck nigger.
If your nigger is a ho, it should be called Latrelle, L'Tanya, or Jemima.
Some owners call their nigger hoes Latrine for a joke.
Pearl, Blossom, and Ivory are also righteous names for nigger hoes.
These names go straight over your nigger's head, by the way.CONFIGURING YOUR NIGGEROwing to a design error, your nigger comes equipped with a tongue and vocal chords.
Most niggers can master only a few basic human phrases with this apparatus - "muh dick" being the most popular.
However, others make barking, yelping, yapping noises and appear to be in some pain, so you should probably call a vet and have him remove your nigger's tongue.
Once de-tongued your nigger will be a lot happier - at least, you won't hear it complaining anywhere near as much.
Niggers have nothing interesting to say, anyway.
Many owners also castrate their niggers for health reasons (yours, mine, and that of women, not the nigger's).
This is strongly recommended, and frankly, it's a mystery why this is not done on the boatHOUSING YOUR NIGGER.Your nigger can be accommodated in cages with stout iron bars.
Make sure, however, that the bars are wide enough to push pieces of nigger food through.
The rule of thumb is, four niggers per square yard of cage.
So a fifteen foot by thirty foot nigger cage can accommodate two hundred niggers.
You can site a nigger cage anywhere, even on soft ground.
Don't worry about your nigger fashioning makeshift shovels out of odd pieces of wood and digging an escape tunnel under the bars of the cage.
Niggers never invented the shovel before and they're not about to now.
In any case, your nigger is certainly too lazy to attempt escape.
As long as the free food holds out, your nigger is living better than it did in Africa, so it will stay put.
Buck niggers and hoe niggers can be safely accommodated in the same cage, as bucks never attempt sex with black hoes.FEEDING YOUR NIGGER.Your Nigger likes fried chicken, corn bread, and watermelon.
You should therefore give it none of these things because its lazy ass almost certainly doesn't deserve it.
Instead, feed it on porridge with salt, and creek water.
Your nigger will supplement its diet with whatever it finds in the fields, other niggers, etc.
Experienced nigger owners sometimes push watermelon slices through the bars of the nigger cage at the end of the day as a treat, but only if all niggers have worked well and nothing has been stolen that day.
Mike of the Old Ranch Plantation reports that this last one is a killer, since all niggers steal something almost every single day of their lives.
He reports he doesn't have to spend much on free watermelon for his niggers as a result.
You should never allow your nigger meal breaks while at work, since if it stops work for more than ten minutes it will need to be retrained.
You would be surprised how long it takes to teach a nigger to pick cotton.
You really would.
Coffee beans?
Don't ask.
You have no idea.MAKING YOUR NIGGER WORK.Niggers are very, very averse to work of any kind.
The nigger's most</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30013664</id>
	<title>An innocent question (from experience)</title>
	<author>tgv</author>
	<datestamp>1257599700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Years ago, I worked for a natural language based search engine start-up, and the most frequent question was "sex". Yes, just three letters. Every day again. We also had a dedicated search engine for a bank, where clients could ask banking related questions. And even there people typed "sex", although it wasn't the most frequent question.</p><p>So I wonder, what did Google do to filter out the questions that I would expect most? Or did anyone ever encounter anything stronger than "make a baby"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Years ago , I worked for a natural language based search engine start-up , and the most frequent question was " sex " .
Yes , just three letters .
Every day again .
We also had a dedicated search engine for a bank , where clients could ask banking related questions .
And even there people typed " sex " , although it was n't the most frequent question.So I wonder , what did Google do to filter out the questions that I would expect most ?
Or did anyone ever encounter anything stronger than " make a baby " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Years ago, I worked for a natural language based search engine start-up, and the most frequent question was "sex".
Yes, just three letters.
Every day again.
We also had a dedicated search engine for a bank, where clients could ask banking related questions.
And even there people typed "sex", although it wasn't the most frequent question.So I wonder, what did Google do to filter out the questions that I would expect most?
Or did anyone ever encounter anything stronger than "make a baby"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009862</id>
	<title>Re:Jesus</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1257502560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe God jused used a date-rape drug on her.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe God jused used a date-rape drug on her .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe God jused used a date-rape drug on her.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009644</id>
	<title>Re:Many of these questions are legitimate</title>
	<author>Wonko the Sane</author>
	<datestamp>1257501660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>In a desperate situation, drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions. It's commonly mentioned in media.</p></div></blockquote><p>Supposedly you can recycle tamiflu that way also.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In a desperate situation , drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions .
It 's commonly mentioned in media.Supposedly you can recycle tamiflu that way also .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a desperate situation, drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions.
It's commonly mentioned in media.Supposedly you can recycle tamiflu that way also.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30012924</id>
	<title>Press</title>
	<author>Johnny Mnemonic</author>
	<datestamp>1257626280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The stupidity of the article may not suggest much about humanity in general, but it certainly suggests why the mainstream media is losing out to Google.</p><p>Another 30 seconds of research on the part of this author could have made it a much more interesting article.  But instead of using a braincell, he went for shock value and FAIL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The stupidity of the article may not suggest much about humanity in general , but it certainly suggests why the mainstream media is losing out to Google.Another 30 seconds of research on the part of this author could have made it a much more interesting article .
But instead of using a braincell , he went for shock value and FAIL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The stupidity of the article may not suggest much about humanity in general, but it certainly suggests why the mainstream media is losing out to Google.Another 30 seconds of research on the part of this author could have made it a much more interesting article.
But instead of using a braincell, he went for shock value and FAIL.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30064684</id>
	<title>A Logic Named Joe</title>
	<author>marquis111</author>
	<datestamp>1257108720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Leinster foresaw this only 63 years ago.  Go look it up; it's a good and amazingly prescient story.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Leinster foresaw this only 63 years ago .
Go look it up ; it 's a good and amazingly prescient story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Leinster foresaw this only 63 years ago.
Go look it up; it's a good and amazingly prescient story.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009680</id>
	<title>Re:Many of these questions are legitimate</title>
	<author>Any Web Loco</author>
	<datestamp>1257501840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"...blow $300 at the Emergency Room."<br>

Ok so a little off-topic but if you think you're having a heart attack you should not have to think twice about seeking medical advice - cost should not hold you back.

One of the advantages of socialised health care I guess...</htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...blow $ 300 at the Emergency Room .
" Ok so a little off-topic but if you think you 're having a heart attack you should not have to think twice about seeking medical advice - cost should not hold you back .
One of the advantages of socialised health care I guess.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...blow $300 at the Emergency Room.
"

Ok so a little off-topic but if you think you're having a heart attack you should not have to think twice about seeking medical advice - cost should not hold you back.
One of the advantages of socialised health care I guess...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009194</id>
	<title>How much will it cost to hire a</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257499620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pindostani as a personal assistant for one year?  The question, obviously, presumes that Pindostanis are capable of working.</p><p>Yours In Novorossisysk,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pindostani as a personal assistant for one year ?
The question , obviously , presumes that Pindostanis are capable of working.Yours In Novorossisysk,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pindostani as a personal assistant for one year?
The question, obviously, presumes that Pindostanis are capable of working.Yours In Novorossisysk,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008954</id>
	<title>Re:Many of these questions are legitimate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257498720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(1) Google "What is the chance" and facepalm away.</p><p>(2) Slate had an article this week about the differences between how people ask google questions. It's enlightening.</p><p>http://www.slate.com/id/2234019/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( 1 ) Google " What is the chance " and facepalm away .
( 2 ) Slate had an article this week about the differences between how people ask google questions .
It 's enlightening.http : //www.slate.com/id/2234019/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(1) Google "What is the chance" and facepalm away.
(2) Slate had an article this week about the differences between how people ask google questions.
It's enlightening.http://www.slate.com/id/2234019/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010416</id>
	<title>The State of Contemporary Journalism</title>
	<author>32771</author>
	<datestamp>1257505320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder why they didn't bother to check what Google had to offer as links for the mentioned searches, or why they didn't tell us. Surely they must have felt great to find out how smart they are, or do they want to give us something we can feel smart about.</p><p>Do the authors maybe even want to make us feel superior over the typical CNet journalist?</p><p>Also, why should we follow their eclectic mix of links? Maybe they were offered money for our eyeballs and didn't know how to get our attention other than through our intellectual vanity (darn safe bet).</p><p>Anyway, my mind boggles. Do you have any better ideas?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder why they did n't bother to check what Google had to offer as links for the mentioned searches , or why they did n't tell us .
Surely they must have felt great to find out how smart they are , or do they want to give us something we can feel smart about.Do the authors maybe even want to make us feel superior over the typical CNet journalist ? Also , why should we follow their eclectic mix of links ?
Maybe they were offered money for our eyeballs and did n't know how to get our attention other than through our intellectual vanity ( darn safe bet ) .Anyway , my mind boggles .
Do you have any better ideas ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder why they didn't bother to check what Google had to offer as links for the mentioned searches, or why they didn't tell us.
Surely they must have felt great to find out how smart they are, or do they want to give us something we can feel smart about.Do the authors maybe even want to make us feel superior over the typical CNet journalist?Also, why should we follow their eclectic mix of links?
Maybe they were offered money for our eyeballs and didn't know how to get our attention other than through our intellectual vanity (darn safe bet).Anyway, my mind boggles.
Do you have any better ideas?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009594</id>
	<title>Vive la difference!</title>
	<author>$pace6host</author>
	<datestamp>1257501360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Try out "why won't he" vs "why won't she" for an insight into the differences between men and women...<p>There are probably some other questions where you can swap a gender pronoun and see similar differences.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try out " why wo n't he " vs " why wo n't she " for an insight into the differences between men and women...There are probably some other questions where you can swap a gender pronoun and see similar differences .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try out "why won't he" vs "why won't she" for an insight into the differences between men and women...There are probably some other questions where you can swap a gender pronoun and see similar differences.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009988</id>
	<title>Re:Many of these questions are legitimate</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1257503100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If only there were some sort of tool the author could have used to find out if there were reasonable answers to these questions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If only there were some sort of tool the author could have used to find out if there were reasonable answers to these questions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If only there were some sort of tool the author could have used to find out if there were reasonable answers to these questions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008608</id>
	<title>let's not forget drunk &amp; silly people</title>
	<author>danpritts</author>
	<datestamp>1257540540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can imagine "why can't i own a canadian" being a joke.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can imagine " why ca n't i own a canadian " being a joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can imagine "why can't i own a canadian" being a joke.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009184</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257499620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But it's not true...</p><p>Half of people are stupider than the median stupidity, but average stupidity can be far off of halfway up the stupid scale. It's entirely possible that the results are right skewed; maybe there are just some really smart people bringing up the average.  Then way more than half of the people in the world are stupider than average.</p><p>I guess it's possible that there are just some really stupid people out there bringing down the average, but way more than half of the people I meet are <i>really</i> stupid, so I don't think that's the case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But it 's not true...Half of people are stupider than the median stupidity , but average stupidity can be far off of halfway up the stupid scale .
It 's entirely possible that the results are right skewed ; maybe there are just some really smart people bringing up the average .
Then way more than half of the people in the world are stupider than average.I guess it 's possible that there are just some really stupid people out there bringing down the average , but way more than half of the people I meet are really stupid , so I do n't think that 's the case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it's not true...Half of people are stupider than the median stupidity, but average stupidity can be far off of halfway up the stupid scale.
It's entirely possible that the results are right skewed; maybe there are just some really smart people bringing up the average.
Then way more than half of the people in the world are stupider than average.I guess it's possible that there are just some really stupid people out there bringing down the average, but way more than half of the people I meet are really stupid, so I don't think that's the case.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009338</id>
	<title>More interesting analysis</title>
	<author>rm999</author>
	<datestamp>1257500280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, this is kind of dumb. As others point out, most of these questions have reasonable explanations. But I think this (http://i.imgur.com/EYY9.png) is actually interesting.</p><p>The way someone words his question appears to be correlated to how educated the question actually is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , this is kind of dumb .
As others point out , most of these questions have reasonable explanations .
But I think this ( http : //i.imgur.com/EYY9.png ) is actually interesting.The way someone words his question appears to be correlated to how educated the question actually is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, this is kind of dumb.
As others point out, most of these questions have reasonable explanations.
But I think this (http://i.imgur.com/EYY9.png) is actually interesting.The way someone words his question appears to be correlated to how educated the question actually is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30013032</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257584880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Psychology trick for psychologists:<br>
You look much smarter when your mouth is shut.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Psychology trick for psychologists : You look much smarter when your mouth is shut .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Psychology trick for psychologists:
You look much smarter when your mouth is shut.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008620</id>
	<title>Personal anecdote</title>
	<author>Estanislao Martínez</author>
	<datestamp>1257540540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I once many years ago went to Google HQ to interview for a part-time job.  In the lobby, right above the receptionist's desk, they had a big scrolling LCD thingy that shows actual searches that have been sent to the search engine.

</p><p>The list was censored so that nothing NSFW would pop up, of course, but it was far from perfect.  So me and my friend got treated to a good one: "voir les culottes de filles."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I once many years ago went to Google HQ to interview for a part-time job .
In the lobby , right above the receptionist 's desk , they had a big scrolling LCD thingy that shows actual searches that have been sent to the search engine .
The list was censored so that nothing NSFW would pop up , of course , but it was far from perfect .
So me and my friend got treated to a good one : " voir les culottes de filles .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I once many years ago went to Google HQ to interview for a part-time job.
In the lobby, right above the receptionist's desk, they had a big scrolling LCD thingy that shows actual searches that have been sent to the search engine.
The list was censored so that nothing NSFW would pop up, of course, but it was far from perfect.
So me and my friend got treated to a good one: "voir les culottes de filles.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009068</id>
	<title>OMFG</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257499140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why can't a pregnancy test be negative?  It's called pregnancy test for a reason, not "Still a Whore" test.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ca n't a pregnancy test be negative ?
It 's called pregnancy test for a reason , not " Still a Whore " test .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why can't a pregnancy test be negative?
It's called pregnancy test for a reason, not "Still a Whore" test.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008756</id>
	<title>thousand monkeys</title>
	<author>tarzan353</author>
	<datestamp>1257541080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reminds me of the "thousand monkeys at a thousand typewriters" thought experiment.
<br> <br>
As a side note, I think that this confirms my pet theory concerning time travel: any attempt to do it will change the past, which changes the conditions of the travel slightly, which changes the past, and so on, until the travel never occurs and the past stops changing. In other words, a spacetime where time travel happens is unstable and decays into one where it won't. Quantum uncertainty would, in this interpretation, be there to allow causality to "stretch" enough to allow such decay; a hypothethical universe without quantum uncertainty but with sentience and time travel (which is an inevitable outcome of the Theory of Relativity, which in turn is an inevitable outcome from the laws of physics being the same for all observers) would tear itself apart. You can thus deduct the Uncertainty Principle from the Anthropic Principle (we are here, so this universe must be able to support sentient life).
<br> <br>
I wonder if you could calculate the minimum required amount of uncertainty for spacetime to stay consistent, and how it would relate to observed/otherwise calculated values? Assume that the first singularity formed at t=0, and has been moving infinitely close to lightspeed ever since, and connects to every other time period through a wormhole, and go from there. The math is beyond me, does anyone else care to try?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of the " thousand monkeys at a thousand typewriters " thought experiment .
As a side note , I think that this confirms my pet theory concerning time travel : any attempt to do it will change the past , which changes the conditions of the travel slightly , which changes the past , and so on , until the travel never occurs and the past stops changing .
In other words , a spacetime where time travel happens is unstable and decays into one where it wo n't .
Quantum uncertainty would , in this interpretation , be there to allow causality to " stretch " enough to allow such decay ; a hypothethical universe without quantum uncertainty but with sentience and time travel ( which is an inevitable outcome of the Theory of Relativity , which in turn is an inevitable outcome from the laws of physics being the same for all observers ) would tear itself apart .
You can thus deduct the Uncertainty Principle from the Anthropic Principle ( we are here , so this universe must be able to support sentient life ) .
I wonder if you could calculate the minimum required amount of uncertainty for spacetime to stay consistent , and how it would relate to observed/otherwise calculated values ?
Assume that the first singularity formed at t = 0 , and has been moving infinitely close to lightspeed ever since , and connects to every other time period through a wormhole , and go from there .
The math is beyond me , does anyone else care to try ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of the "thousand monkeys at a thousand typewriters" thought experiment.
As a side note, I think that this confirms my pet theory concerning time travel: any attempt to do it will change the past, which changes the conditions of the travel slightly, which changes the past, and so on, until the travel never occurs and the past stops changing.
In other words, a spacetime where time travel happens is unstable and decays into one where it won't.
Quantum uncertainty would, in this interpretation, be there to allow causality to "stretch" enough to allow such decay; a hypothethical universe without quantum uncertainty but with sentience and time travel (which is an inevitable outcome of the Theory of Relativity, which in turn is an inevitable outcome from the laws of physics being the same for all observers) would tear itself apart.
You can thus deduct the Uncertainty Principle from the Anthropic Principle (we are here, so this universe must be able to support sentient life).
I wonder if you could calculate the minimum required amount of uncertainty for spacetime to stay consistent, and how it would relate to observed/otherwise calculated values?
Assume that the first singularity formed at t=0, and has been moving infinitely close to lightspeed ever since, and connects to every other time period through a wormhole, and go from there.
The math is beyond me, does anyone else care to try?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009278</id>
	<title>Having a Heart Attack?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257500040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How the fuck is "am I having a heart attack?" a stupid question to google? Many people are far too shy to inconvenience a doctor or dial the emergency services if they are unsure they are sick. Old people brought up with different values especially (at least here in Britain). No doubt at least a handufl of lives have been saved by this question.</p><p>To me googling something seems like the perfect way to ask a dumb question you are not quite 100\% sure about or embarassed to ask. Is the internet despite its anonymity now just another place in society we have to wear a veneer of perfection and infallibility?</p><p>I assume the writer of the article knows the answer to every single rudimenary question that could possibly be asked?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How the fuck is " am I having a heart attack ?
" a stupid question to google ?
Many people are far too shy to inconvenience a doctor or dial the emergency services if they are unsure they are sick .
Old people brought up with different values especially ( at least here in Britain ) .
No doubt at least a handufl of lives have been saved by this question.To me googling something seems like the perfect way to ask a dumb question you are not quite 100 \ % sure about or embarassed to ask .
Is the internet despite its anonymity now just another place in society we have to wear a veneer of perfection and infallibility ? I assume the writer of the article knows the answer to every single rudimenary question that could possibly be asked ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How the fuck is "am I having a heart attack?
" a stupid question to google?
Many people are far too shy to inconvenience a doctor or dial the emergency services if they are unsure they are sick.
Old people brought up with different values especially (at least here in Britain).
No doubt at least a handufl of lives have been saved by this question.To me googling something seems like the perfect way to ask a dumb question you are not quite 100\% sure about or embarassed to ask.
Is the internet despite its anonymity now just another place in society we have to wear a veneer of perfection and infallibility?I assume the writer of the article knows the answer to every single rudimenary question that could possibly be asked?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010358</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1257504960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He also said something like 'think about what a pussy the average person is, and then realize half of them are bigger pussies than that'.</p><p>So it isn't really that surprising that you are scared of something stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He also said something like 'think about what a pussy the average person is , and then realize half of them are bigger pussies than that'.So it is n't really that surprising that you are scared of something stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He also said something like 'think about what a pussy the average person is, and then realize half of them are bigger pussies than that'.So it isn't really that surprising that you are scared of something stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30012674</id>
	<title>As reported by 'Duh' Magazine</title>
	<author>Livius</author>
	<datestamp>1257534240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It almost makes you wonder if there are other cases where less than full sentences taken out of context might be misconstrued.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It almost makes you wonder if there are other cases where less than full sentences taken out of context might be misconstrued .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It almost makes you wonder if there are other cases where less than full sentences taken out of context might be misconstrued.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30061890</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257097740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, that'd be the mean.  Stupid Carlin was stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , that 'd be the mean .
Stupid Carlin was stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, that'd be the mean.
Stupid Carlin was stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011402</id>
	<title>Re:I entered</title>
	<author>russ1337</author>
	<datestamp>1257512760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How can I nail...




I expected Google to suggest, "a hot chick." at minimum, but instead it suggested nothing.</p></div><p>Me: "How can I nail"<br>
Google:"the last nail when crucifying myself"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can I nail.. . I expected Google to suggest , " a hot chick .
" at minimum , but instead it suggested nothing.Me : " How can I nail " Google : " the last nail when crucifying myself "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can I nail...




I expected Google to suggest, "a hot chick.
" at minimum, but instead it suggested nothing.Me: "How can I nail"
Google:"the last nail when crucifying myself"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008962</id>
	<title>Another good one</title>
	<author>matzahboy</author>
	<datestamp>1257498780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Search: I am

One of the suggestions: "I am extremely terrified of chinese people"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Search : I am One of the suggestions : " I am extremely terrified of chinese people "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Search: I am

One of the suggestions: "I am extremely terrified of chinese people"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011842</id>
	<title>Re:Jesus</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257518280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>An egg.  LOL.<br>
Moron.</p></div><p>An egg.  LOL.<br>
Mormon.</p><p>Fixed it for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>An egg .
LOL . Moron.An egg .
LOL . Mormon.Fixed it for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An egg.
LOL.
Moron.An egg.
LOL.
Mormon.Fixed it for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011006</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>zapakh</author>
	<datestamp>1257509400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Okay, I'm done being pedantic.</p></div><p>In that case, I can say this:
</p><p>
Half of all people are more pedantic than average.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , I 'm done being pedantic.In that case , I can say this : Half of all people are more pedantic than average .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, I'm done being pedantic.In that case, I can say this:

Half of all people are more pedantic than average.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010348</id>
	<title>Internet Confirmed Stereotypes!</title>
	<author>RTigger</author>
	<datestamp>1257504900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>www.stereotypefinder.com - a buddy and I wrote this back in the day to take advantage of google's "auto complete" search queries.  The numbers correspond to the # of websites that will answer the query.</htmltext>
<tokenext>www.stereotypefinder.com - a buddy and I wrote this back in the day to take advantage of google 's " auto complete " search queries .
The numbers correspond to the # of websites that will answer the query .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>www.stereotypefinder.com - a buddy and I wrote this back in the day to take advantage of google's "auto complete" search queries.
The numbers correspond to the # of websites that will answer the query.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009070</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257499140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dear Mr. Carlin, averages don't work that way.  Sincerely, Humorless Pedant.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear Mr. Carlin , averages do n't work that way .
Sincerely , Humorless Pedant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear Mr. Carlin, averages don't work that way.
Sincerely, Humorless Pedant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010292</id>
	<title>Re:Many of these questions are legitimate</title>
	<author>godel\_56</author>
	<datestamp>1257504600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Many of the "inane" questions in the article illustrate the stupidity of the journalist who wrote the article.  Most of these questions are legitimate, with a legitimate answer.</p><p>Can you drink your own urine?</p><p>Again, a legitimate question.  In a desperate situation, drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions.  It's commonly mentioned in media.</p></div><p>Also, I believe drinking your own urine is advocated by some weird alternative medicine and religious practices.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Many of the " inane " questions in the article illustrate the stupidity of the journalist who wrote the article .
Most of these questions are legitimate , with a legitimate answer.Can you drink your own urine ? Again , a legitimate question .
In a desperate situation , drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions .
It 's commonly mentioned in media.Also , I believe drinking your own urine is advocated by some weird alternative medicine and religious practices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many of the "inane" questions in the article illustrate the stupidity of the journalist who wrote the article.
Most of these questions are legitimate, with a legitimate answer.Can you drink your own urine?Again, a legitimate question.
In a desperate situation, drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions.
It's commonly mentioned in media.Also, I believe drinking your own urine is advocated by some weird alternative medicine and religious practices.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30012922</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257626220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Technically, that's the median, not the average.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Technically , that 's the median , not the average .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Technically, that's the median, not the average.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009642</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>Ragzouken</author>
	<datestamp>1257501660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Medians work like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Medians work like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Medians work like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010400</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257505200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Makes sense.  Psychologists don't take a lot of math, they just make things up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Makes sense .
Psychologists do n't take a lot of math , they just make things up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Makes sense.
Psychologists don't take a lot of math, they just make things up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009874</id>
	<title>Re:Years ago ..</title>
	<author>ThePlague</author>
	<datestamp>1257502620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the flip side, there was a "game" many years ago called "google whacking", where you tried to find two words that when typed into google would give exactly one hit.  I doubt it would work now, but back say in 2000, it was still possible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the flip side , there was a " game " many years ago called " google whacking " , where you tried to find two words that when typed into google would give exactly one hit .
I doubt it would work now , but back say in 2000 , it was still possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the flip side, there was a "game" many years ago called "google whacking", where you tried to find two words that when typed into google would give exactly one hit.
I doubt it would work now, but back say in 2000, it was still possible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008906</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>dxkelly</author>
	<datestamp>1257498600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks alot. Now I'm scared to go out to do the laundry.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks alot .
Now I 'm scared to go out to do the laundry .
: - (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks alot.
Now I'm scared to go out to do the laundry.
:-(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009754</id>
	<title>Re:Many of these questions are legitimate</title>
	<author>hatemonger</author>
	<datestamp>1257502140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course these are legitimate searches, but you won't get clicks on your article unless you take them out of context. This is especially appealing to the reader because it's subconsciously telling them "look at all these people dumber than you!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course these are legitimate searches , but you wo n't get clicks on your article unless you take them out of context .
This is especially appealing to the reader because it 's subconsciously telling them " look at all these people dumber than you !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course these are legitimate searches, but you won't get clicks on your article unless you take them out of context.
This is especially appealing to the reader because it's subconsciously telling them "look at all these people dumber than you!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008666</id>
	<title>Not Impressed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257540720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course, if you just look at the suggestions they're funny, but if you actually search them there's actually context beyond just total retards googling shit. For instance, the "Why Can't I Own a Canadian?" question is in reference to this letter: http://www.humanistsofutah.org/2002/WhyCantIOwnACanadian\_10-02.html<br>
&nbsp; <br>Breaking news: things have context!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , if you just look at the suggestions they 're funny , but if you actually search them there 's actually context beyond just total retards googling shit .
For instance , the " Why Ca n't I Own a Canadian ?
" question is in reference to this letter : http : //www.humanistsofutah.org/2002/WhyCantIOwnACanadian \ _10-02.html   Breaking news : things have context !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, if you just look at the suggestions they're funny, but if you actually search them there's actually context beyond just total retards googling shit.
For instance, the "Why Can't I Own a Canadian?
" question is in reference to this letter: http://www.humanistsofutah.org/2002/WhyCantIOwnACanadian\_10-02.html
  Breaking news: things have context!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009560</id>
	<title>Just idle fun...</title>
	<author>jemenake</author>
	<datestamp>1257501180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google's auto-complete is a great source of idle amusement. Just type in "Why does" and peruse the questions from people whose vote counts just as much as yours in every election. (My favorite is "Why does my vag smell". Something about the slang term used... it's just...  I dunno).
<br> <br>
In fact, in the category of typing just part of a phrase and letting it take you where it will, I'd have to say that typing "why does" or "how does" into google comes in second only to typing in "goes wrong" in YouTube.
<br> <br>
But to answer your original question about what it tells us about humanity: It tells us that most of them are pretty dumb.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google 's auto-complete is a great source of idle amusement .
Just type in " Why does " and peruse the questions from people whose vote counts just as much as yours in every election .
( My favorite is " Why does my vag smell " .
Something about the slang term used... it 's just... I dunno ) .
In fact , in the category of typing just part of a phrase and letting it take you where it will , I 'd have to say that typing " why does " or " how does " into google comes in second only to typing in " goes wrong " in YouTube .
But to answer your original question about what it tells us about humanity : It tells us that most of them are pretty dumb .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google's auto-complete is a great source of idle amusement.
Just type in "Why does" and peruse the questions from people whose vote counts just as much as yours in every election.
(My favorite is "Why does my vag smell".
Something about the slang term used... it's just...  I dunno).
In fact, in the category of typing just part of a phrase and letting it take you where it will, I'd have to say that typing "why does" or "how does" into google comes in second only to typing in "goes wrong" in YouTube.
But to answer your original question about what it tells us about humanity: It tells us that most of them are pretty dumb.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010272</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>StackedCrooked</author>
	<datestamp>1257504480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>50\% of the population has an IQ = 100. Scary, by definition.</htmltext>
<tokenext>50 \ % of the population has an IQ = 100 .
Scary , by definition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>50\% of the population has an IQ = 100.
Scary, by definition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009336</id>
	<title>Microsoft Success Stories</title>
	<author>fauxhammer</author>
	<datestamp>1257500280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's no longer the case, but in the first few days of Bing, typing in "Microsoft Sucks" would suggest "Microsoft success stories"</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's no longer the case , but in the first few days of Bing , typing in " Microsoft Sucks " would suggest " Microsoft success stories "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's no longer the case, but in the first few days of Bing, typing in "Microsoft Sucks" would suggest "Microsoft success stories"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010530</id>
	<title>Why can't i...</title>
	<author>Jorgandar</author>
	<datestamp>1257505980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why can't i see my reflection in the mirror on a television?</p><p>Are you f'n *kidding* me?  People are asking this question?  Wow...just wow.  I don't know what's sadder, the stupidity of people or the fact that I haven't been able to find a way to get rich off of these stupid people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ca n't i see my reflection in the mirror on a television ? Are you f'n * kidding * me ?
People are asking this question ?
Wow...just wow .
I do n't know what 's sadder , the stupidity of people or the fact that I have n't been able to find a way to get rich off of these stupid people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why can't i see my reflection in the mirror on a television?Are you f'n *kidding* me?
People are asking this question?
Wow...just wow.
I don't know what's sadder, the stupidity of people or the fact that I haven't been able to find a way to get rich off of these stupid people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30014808</id>
	<title>Re:Many of these questions are legitimate</title>
	<author>snowgirl</author>
	<datestamp>1257616140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Am I having a heart attack?</p><p>Again, it's possible to mistake heartburn and cracked ribs for a heart attack.  Maybe you should see what the symptoms are before you blow $300 at the Emergency Room.</p></div><p>Thank god I saved that $300 Emergency Room visit (wtf country are you in, in the USA it's more than that just to walk in the door)</p><p>All I had was cracked ribs!  Now that I know, I don't need to visit the ER.</p><p>There are two things that if you think you're having, GO TO THE ER, even though it might be something minimal, you are far better off being sure, because if you're wrong, then every second counts.  The first is a heart attack, the second is a stroke.  Don't try and figure out if you have one, YOU ARE NOT A TRAINED DOCTOR... instead, if you think it's possible that you're having one, go to the ER.</p><p>Wasting $300 is a better bet than losing even 5 minutes if you actually are.  It's like Pascal's Wager, only without infinite gain/loss... ok, well, the 5 minutes might cause you infinite loss in this physical world, so betting against that is typically the best thing one can ever do.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I having a heart attack ? Again , it 's possible to mistake heartburn and cracked ribs for a heart attack .
Maybe you should see what the symptoms are before you blow $ 300 at the Emergency Room.Thank god I saved that $ 300 Emergency Room visit ( wtf country are you in , in the USA it 's more than that just to walk in the door ) All I had was cracked ribs !
Now that I know , I do n't need to visit the ER.There are two things that if you think you 're having , GO TO THE ER , even though it might be something minimal , you are far better off being sure , because if you 're wrong , then every second counts .
The first is a heart attack , the second is a stroke .
Do n't try and figure out if you have one , YOU ARE NOT A TRAINED DOCTOR... instead , if you think it 's possible that you 're having one , go to the ER.Wasting $ 300 is a better bet than losing even 5 minutes if you actually are .
It 's like Pascal 's Wager , only without infinite gain/loss... ok , well , the 5 minutes might cause you infinite loss in this physical world , so betting against that is typically the best thing one can ever do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I having a heart attack?Again, it's possible to mistake heartburn and cracked ribs for a heart attack.
Maybe you should see what the symptoms are before you blow $300 at the Emergency Room.Thank god I saved that $300 Emergency Room visit (wtf country are you in, in the USA it's more than that just to walk in the door)All I had was cracked ribs!
Now that I know, I don't need to visit the ER.There are two things that if you think you're having, GO TO THE ER, even though it might be something minimal, you are far better off being sure, because if you're wrong, then every second counts.
The first is a heart attack, the second is a stroke.
Don't try and figure out if you have one, YOU ARE NOT A TRAINED DOCTOR... instead, if you think it's possible that you're having one, go to the ER.Wasting $300 is a better bet than losing even 5 minutes if you actually are.
It's like Pascal's Wager, only without infinite gain/loss... ok, well, the 5 minutes might cause you infinite loss in this physical world, so betting against that is typically the best thing one can ever do.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008740</id>
	<title>Satire Filter</title>
	<author>Telos06</author>
	<datestamp>1257540960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.humanistsofutah.org/2002/WhyCantIOwnACanadian\_10-02.html" title="humanistsofutah.org" rel="nofollow">Why Can't I Own a Canadian</a> [humanistsofutah.org] is an article satirizing fundamentalist Christian condemnation of homosexuality (aimed at "Dr." Schlessinger in particular). This is the problem with taking searches out of context - you assume the person is asking a legitimate question when it could mean a number of other things.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why Ca n't I Own a Canadian [ humanistsofutah.org ] is an article satirizing fundamentalist Christian condemnation of homosexuality ( aimed at " Dr. " Schlessinger in particular ) .
This is the problem with taking searches out of context - you assume the person is asking a legitimate question when it could mean a number of other things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why Can't I Own a Canadian [humanistsofutah.org] is an article satirizing fundamentalist Christian condemnation of homosexuality (aimed at "Dr." Schlessinger in particular).
This is the problem with taking searches out of context - you assume the person is asking a legitimate question when it could mean a number of other things.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30014180</id>
	<title>Re:Your official guide to the Jigaboo presidency</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257607800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dude, my nigger drowned. WTF?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , my nigger drowned .
WTF ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, my nigger drowned.
WTF?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30014210</id>
	<title>Best Google suggestion in french</title>
	<author>thinduke</author>
	<datestamp>1257608220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In french:</p><p><b>Me:</b> est-ce que...<br><b>Google:</b><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Google nous rend idiot?</p><p>(Does... Google make us stupid?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In french : Me : est-ce que...Google : ... Google nous rend idiot ? ( Does.. .
Google make us stupid ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In french:Me: est-ce que...Google: ... Google nous rend idiot?(Does...
Google make us stupid?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008894</id>
	<title>Funny effect</title>
	<author>parallel\_prankster</author>
	<datestamp>1257498540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So there is an weird and funny effect here. Apparently a lot of the google suggestions are funny and it may be because when people search for something and something else comes up which is funny, they wanna go look at it. This way the funny result keeps climbing the rankings. At some point the result for what are these strawberries doing on my nipples was not the number 1 result, but it seems funny and so people end up clicking on it and this is how its become number 1.
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/torley/3558343796/" title="flickr.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/torley/3558343796/</a> [flickr.com]
Case closed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So there is an weird and funny effect here .
Apparently a lot of the google suggestions are funny and it may be because when people search for something and something else comes up which is funny , they wan na go look at it .
This way the funny result keeps climbing the rankings .
At some point the result for what are these strawberries doing on my nipples was not the number 1 result , but it seems funny and so people end up clicking on it and this is how its become number 1 . http : //www.flickr.com/photos/torley/3558343796/ [ flickr.com ] Case closed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So there is an weird and funny effect here.
Apparently a lot of the google suggestions are funny and it may be because when people search for something and something else comes up which is funny, they wanna go look at it.
This way the funny result keeps climbing the rankings.
At some point the result for what are these strawberries doing on my nipples was not the number 1 result, but it seems funny and so people end up clicking on it and this is how its become number 1.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/torley/3558343796/ [flickr.com]
Case closed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008730</id>
	<title>Some More</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257540900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.fukung.net/tag/google" title="fukung.net" rel="nofollow">fukung tag search for 'google'</a> [fukung.net]</p><p>They're a lot more fun when you see screenshots.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>fukung tag search for 'google ' [ fukung.net ] They 're a lot more fun when you see screenshots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fukung tag search for 'google' [fukung.net]They're a lot more fun when you see screenshots.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011774</id>
	<title>Know you History</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257517320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?</p></div><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...because the last time you tried <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War\_of\_1812" title="wikipedia.org">it did not go so well.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you clarify ?
Why ca n't I own Canadians ?
...because the last time you tried it did not go so well .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you clarify?
Why can't I own Canadians?
...because the last time you tried it did not go so well.
[wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009688</id>
	<title>The questions are from other websites</title>
	<author>koick</author>
	<datestamp>1257501900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't Google suggest phrases combed from other websites (with fairly high pagerank) and not some 'best of' type questions people are typing directly into the google search box?  If so, it's *other* websites, not google which are getting (and presumably answering) these questions, and the article is misleading about them being "popular searches".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Correct me if I 'm wrong , but are n't Google suggest phrases combed from other websites ( with fairly high pagerank ) and not some 'best of ' type questions people are typing directly into the google search box ?
If so , it 's * other * websites , not google which are getting ( and presumably answering ) these questions , and the article is misleading about them being " popular searches " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't Google suggest phrases combed from other websites (with fairly high pagerank) and not some 'best of' type questions people are typing directly into the google search box?
If so, it's *other* websites, not google which are getting (and presumably answering) these questions, and the article is misleading about them being "popular searches".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008674</id>
	<title>Why can't I Own a Canadian?</title>
	<author>thue</author>
	<datestamp>1257540780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "Why can't I own a Canadian" question comes from this joke: <a href="http://www.humanistsofutah.org/2002/WhyCantIOwnACanadian\_10-02.html" title="humanistsofutah.org">http://www.humanistsofutah.org/2002/WhyCantIOwnACanadian\_10-02.html</a> [humanistsofutah.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " Why ca n't I own a Canadian " question comes from this joke : http : //www.humanistsofutah.org/2002/WhyCantIOwnACanadian \ _10-02.html [ humanistsofutah.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "Why can't I own a Canadian" question comes from this joke: http://www.humanistsofutah.org/2002/WhyCantIOwnACanadian\_10-02.html [humanistsofutah.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30012088</id>
	<title>Re:Jesus</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257521760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>FTFA: "Why would a little girl in Yorkshire think Jesus was born in an egg?"</p><p>HAHA.  What a stupid little girl.  Everyone knows that Jesus was born to Mary after she immaculately conceived him by receiving God's seed somehow.</p><p>An egg.  LOL.<br>Moron.</p></div><p>Nah, God and Mary had sex, God just wasn't big enough to break her hymen.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTFA : " Why would a little girl in Yorkshire think Jesus was born in an egg ? " HAHA .
What a stupid little girl .
Everyone knows that Jesus was born to Mary after she immaculately conceived him by receiving God 's seed somehow.An egg .
LOL.Moron.Nah , God and Mary had sex , God just was n't big enough to break her hymen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTFA: "Why would a little girl in Yorkshire think Jesus was born in an egg?"HAHA.
What a stupid little girl.
Everyone knows that Jesus was born to Mary after she immaculately conceived him by receiving God's seed somehow.An egg.
LOL.Moron.Nah, God and Mary had sex, God just wasn't big enough to break her hymen.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010928</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>Artifakt</author>
	<datestamp>1257508620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know there's some arguments over whether IQ tests measure intelligence. Please don't bother to rehash those, as they don't affect any of the points about IQ statistics and means and medians, bell curves and such, below.</p><p>1. Nobody actually scores a 10 or 20 on an IQ test. People that messed up can't take the test at all, so someone guesstimates a number. Really, it's hard to get an accurate number for anyone below the 'educable retarded' range, generally thought to be about IQ 50. The top range for diagnosing someone as retarded is about IQ 70 (According to the definition in the American Psychiatric Association 's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV)). Thanks to recent court decisions in the US, 70 is also the number used to determine if somebody can get the death penalty.<br>2. An IQ of 80-130 is considered the normal range, and 100 is considered average. The first point about bell curves is the normal range is not equally distributed around the average (20 points below, 30 points above). That definition, just by itself, means IQ simply can't fit a perfect Bell curve with there being the same numbers of people at the very top edge of the normal part of the curve and the bottom cut-off.<br>3. The first interesting point about medians and means is there's a 10 point gap between the bottom of the average range and the top of the retarded range. There is currently no standardised official name for people in that gap. Nobody really knows whether the percentages with those numbers between 70 and 80 fit any particular curve because they don't really have a classification scheme. There's been a great deal of research on the range we call retarded and the educable portion of that range, but much less research on what we could call the intermediate range.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Note that, by several estimates, that intermediate range contains the average IQ (or peak of the curve if you will ) for people the US has in prison for violent crimes. People with IQs between 70 and 90 have higher crime rates than people with IQs below or above this range, but it depends on whether you look at mean or median values whether the peak is in the gap range or just above it.  So not only don't we know what to call the gap, we aren't sure whether that might be important for understanding violent crime or not.<br>4. An IQ of 121 or more can be expected in about 1 of every 10 people, drawn at random from the population. That's where the 90th \%'ile falls.  The bottom 10th \%'ile should be close to IQ 79, (if you accept the classic bell curve distribution). The US armed forces have long claimed that the 10\% percentile is at IQ 80, very close to that. However, they also claim that's their absolute cut off for taking a potential soldier, and looking at the percentages rejected for mental inadequacy during the specific years of peak recruiting stress (in other words, when quotas produce enormous pressure to take everybody possible), the numbers are closer to about 15-22\%. Some of those skewed peak numbers show up in years 1964-68, at the height of the Vietnam war draft, when damned near every young male born on certain dates was tested. Those numbers therefore suggest there's an excess of below average to anything like a bell curve fit.<br>5. There is no top to the scale. IQ's estimated at well over 200 exist (i.e. Mozart, who gets a prodigious score if you treat writing his first pieces at 6 years old as indicative.).  Technically, that again rules out a literally true bell curve, although you could get 99.99999\% of people to fit under one if the top was the only problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know there 's some arguments over whether IQ tests measure intelligence .
Please do n't bother to rehash those , as they do n't affect any of the points about IQ statistics and means and medians , bell curves and such , below.1 .
Nobody actually scores a 10 or 20 on an IQ test .
People that messed up ca n't take the test at all , so someone guesstimates a number .
Really , it 's hard to get an accurate number for anyone below the 'educable retarded ' range , generally thought to be about IQ 50 .
The top range for diagnosing someone as retarded is about IQ 70 ( According to the definition in the American Psychiatric Association 's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual ( DSM-IV ) ) .
Thanks to recent court decisions in the US , 70 is also the number used to determine if somebody can get the death penalty.2 .
An IQ of 80-130 is considered the normal range , and 100 is considered average .
The first point about bell curves is the normal range is not equally distributed around the average ( 20 points below , 30 points above ) .
That definition , just by itself , means IQ simply ca n't fit a perfect Bell curve with there being the same numbers of people at the very top edge of the normal part of the curve and the bottom cut-off.3 .
The first interesting point about medians and means is there 's a 10 point gap between the bottom of the average range and the top of the retarded range .
There is currently no standardised official name for people in that gap .
Nobody really knows whether the percentages with those numbers between 70 and 80 fit any particular curve because they do n't really have a classification scheme .
There 's been a great deal of research on the range we call retarded and the educable portion of that range , but much less research on what we could call the intermediate range .
          Note that , by several estimates , that intermediate range contains the average IQ ( or peak of the curve if you will ) for people the US has in prison for violent crimes .
People with IQs between 70 and 90 have higher crime rates than people with IQs below or above this range , but it depends on whether you look at mean or median values whether the peak is in the gap range or just above it .
So not only do n't we know what to call the gap , we are n't sure whether that might be important for understanding violent crime or not.4 .
An IQ of 121 or more can be expected in about 1 of every 10 people , drawn at random from the population .
That 's where the 90th \ % 'ile falls .
The bottom 10th \ % 'ile should be close to IQ 79 , ( if you accept the classic bell curve distribution ) .
The US armed forces have long claimed that the 10 \ % percentile is at IQ 80 , very close to that .
However , they also claim that 's their absolute cut off for taking a potential soldier , and looking at the percentages rejected for mental inadequacy during the specific years of peak recruiting stress ( in other words , when quotas produce enormous pressure to take everybody possible ) , the numbers are closer to about 15-22 \ % .
Some of those skewed peak numbers show up in years 1964-68 , at the height of the Vietnam war draft , when damned near every young male born on certain dates was tested .
Those numbers therefore suggest there 's an excess of below average to anything like a bell curve fit.5 .
There is no top to the scale .
IQ 's estimated at well over 200 exist ( i.e .
Mozart , who gets a prodigious score if you treat writing his first pieces at 6 years old as indicative. ) .
Technically , that again rules out a literally true bell curve , although you could get 99.99999 \ % of people to fit under one if the top was the only problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know there's some arguments over whether IQ tests measure intelligence.
Please don't bother to rehash those, as they don't affect any of the points about IQ statistics and means and medians, bell curves and such, below.1.
Nobody actually scores a 10 or 20 on an IQ test.
People that messed up can't take the test at all, so someone guesstimates a number.
Really, it's hard to get an accurate number for anyone below the 'educable retarded' range, generally thought to be about IQ 50.
The top range for diagnosing someone as retarded is about IQ 70 (According to the definition in the American Psychiatric Association 's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV)).
Thanks to recent court decisions in the US, 70 is also the number used to determine if somebody can get the death penalty.2.
An IQ of 80-130 is considered the normal range, and 100 is considered average.
The first point about bell curves is the normal range is not equally distributed around the average (20 points below, 30 points above).
That definition, just by itself, means IQ simply can't fit a perfect Bell curve with there being the same numbers of people at the very top edge of the normal part of the curve and the bottom cut-off.3.
The first interesting point about medians and means is there's a 10 point gap between the bottom of the average range and the top of the retarded range.
There is currently no standardised official name for people in that gap.
Nobody really knows whether the percentages with those numbers between 70 and 80 fit any particular curve because they don't really have a classification scheme.
There's been a great deal of research on the range we call retarded and the educable portion of that range, but much less research on what we could call the intermediate range.
          Note that, by several estimates, that intermediate range contains the average IQ (or peak of the curve if you will ) for people the US has in prison for violent crimes.
People with IQs between 70 and 90 have higher crime rates than people with IQs below or above this range, but it depends on whether you look at mean or median values whether the peak is in the gap range or just above it.
So not only don't we know what to call the gap, we aren't sure whether that might be important for understanding violent crime or not.4.
An IQ of 121 or more can be expected in about 1 of every 10 people, drawn at random from the population.
That's where the 90th \%'ile falls.
The bottom 10th \%'ile should be close to IQ 79, (if you accept the classic bell curve distribution).
The US armed forces have long claimed that the 10\% percentile is at IQ 80, very close to that.
However, they also claim that's their absolute cut off for taking a potential soldier, and looking at the percentages rejected for mental inadequacy during the specific years of peak recruiting stress (in other words, when quotas produce enormous pressure to take everybody possible), the numbers are closer to about 15-22\%.
Some of those skewed peak numbers show up in years 1964-68, at the height of the Vietnam war draft, when damned near every young male born on certain dates was tested.
Those numbers therefore suggest there's an excess of below average to anything like a bell curve fit.5.
There is no top to the scale.
IQ's estimated at well over 200 exist (i.e.
Mozart, who gets a prodigious score if you treat writing his first pieces at 6 years old as indicative.).
Technically, that again rules out a literally true bell curve, although you could get 99.99999\% of people to fit under one if the top was the only problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30013682</id>
	<title>Re:Why can't I own Canadians?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257600180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Survival rates for indentured slavery in USA was 50\% on the passage over (same figure as the Middle Passage from Africa) and 50\% for the 7 years. Mortality for the indenturement may actually have been higher.</p><p>But proposing indentured slavery (no, I will not say "servitude"; it was not a choice, this choosing between hanging or going to America, just for begging for bread) as some sort of fluffy, "not bad" form of slavery ignores the reality of the situation. No one seems to like to hear that white slaves were treated as poorly as black slaves, but its true. And all the Appalachian families that everyone loves to diss are the descendants of white slaves who survived indenturement only to find there was absolutely no place for them to work. So it was off to the hills. The oldest families that weren't nobles, mercantilists, or artisans are still the among USA's poorest, some 400 years later.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Survival rates for indentured slavery in USA was 50 \ % on the passage over ( same figure as the Middle Passage from Africa ) and 50 \ % for the 7 years .
Mortality for the indenturement may actually have been higher.But proposing indentured slavery ( no , I will not say " servitude " ; it was not a choice , this choosing between hanging or going to America , just for begging for bread ) as some sort of fluffy , " not bad " form of slavery ignores the reality of the situation .
No one seems to like to hear that white slaves were treated as poorly as black slaves , but its true .
And all the Appalachian families that everyone loves to diss are the descendants of white slaves who survived indenturement only to find there was absolutely no place for them to work .
So it was off to the hills .
The oldest families that were n't nobles , mercantilists , or artisans are still the among USA 's poorest , some 400 years later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Survival rates for indentured slavery in USA was 50\% on the passage over (same figure as the Middle Passage from Africa) and 50\% for the 7 years.
Mortality for the indenturement may actually have been higher.But proposing indentured slavery (no, I will not say "servitude"; it was not a choice, this choosing between hanging or going to America, just for begging for bread) as some sort of fluffy, "not bad" form of slavery ignores the reality of the situation.
No one seems to like to hear that white slaves were treated as poorly as black slaves, but its true.
And all the Appalachian families that everyone loves to diss are the descendants of white slaves who survived indenturement only to find there was absolutely no place for them to work.
So it was off to the hills.
The oldest families that weren't nobles, mercantilists, or artisans are still the among USA's poorest, some 400 years later.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010122</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1257503700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is quite possibly the best quote ever... I am going to have to remember that one!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is quite possibly the best quote ever... I am going to have to remember that one !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is quite possibly the best quote ever... I am going to have to remember that one!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30013286</id>
	<title>Re:Marrying Your Widow's Sister</title>
	<author>jonadab</author>
	<datestamp>1257593100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure, in most jurisdictions it's illegal for a dead man to marry, but maybe the laws in Scotland are different.  I mean, the men over there wear dresses, so you know they're a little weird, right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , in most jurisdictions it 's illegal for a dead man to marry , but maybe the laws in Scotland are different .
I mean , the men over there wear dresses , so you know they 're a little weird , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, in most jurisdictions it's illegal for a dead man to marry, but maybe the laws in Scotland are different.
I mean, the men over there wear dresses, so you know they're a little weird, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30019228</id>
	<title>Re:Why can't I own Canadians?</title>
	<author>antirelic</author>
	<datestamp>1257615600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you talking about 1 of the 57 states?</p><p>And they called GW stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you talking about 1 of the 57 states ? And they called GW stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you talking about 1 of the 57 states?And they called GW stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008628</id>
	<title>Can you put peroxide in your ear?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257540540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hydrogen Peroxide in your ears is a way to remove ear wax buildup.</p><p>Idk what is so worrying about that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hydrogen Peroxide in your ears is a way to remove ear wax buildup.Idk what is so worrying about that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hydrogen Peroxide in your ears is a way to remove ear wax buildup.Idk what is so worrying about that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30016612</id>
	<title>oh yea, i forgot...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257586860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the real issue here is the average person's ability to form a sentence.  (or lack thereof). formulating thoughts into cohesive constructive bits of language has obviously lost priority to more important things (like bong hits and xbox)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the real issue here is the average person 's ability to form a sentence .
( or lack thereof ) .
formulating thoughts into cohesive constructive bits of language has obviously lost priority to more important things ( like bong hits and xbox )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the real issue here is the average person's ability to form a sentence.
(or lack thereof).
formulating thoughts into cohesive constructive bits of language has obviously lost priority to more important things (like bong hits and xbox)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010516</id>
	<title>Is it filtered?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257505920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just can't believe "How to kill..." doesn't return any suggestion!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just ca n't believe " How to kill... " does n't return any suggestion !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just can't believe "How to kill..." doesn't return any suggestion!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664</id>
	<title>Many of these questions are legitimate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257540720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Many of the "inane" questions in the article illustrate the stupidity of the journalist who wrote the article.  Most of these questions are legitimate, with a legitimate answer.</p><p>Some examples :<br>Can you put peroxide in your ear?</p><p>Actually, you can use it to remove earwax and to disinfect your ear if you went swimming in dirty water.  It's a perfectly safe, legitimate use.</p><p>Am I going in labour?</p><p>Actually, other pains can be mistaken for labor, and it takes hours to develop in many women.  Perhaps you're a woman, and you want to know if that abdominal pain was your first contraction or just a GI problem.</p><p>Am I having a heart attack?</p><p>Again, it's possible to mistake heartburn and cracked ribs for a heart attack.  Maybe you should see what the symptoms are before you blow $300 at the Emergency Room.</p><p>Why can't black people swim?  Why can't white people dance?  Both must be stereotypical behaviors, and maybe there is a reason why it can seem like both are true.</p><p>Can you drink your own urine?</p><p>Again, a legitimate question.  In a desperate situation, drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions.  It's commonly mentioned in media.</p><p>Why would a pregnancy test be negative?</p><p>Yes, it's possible to get a negative test and be pregnant.</p><p>Can two women make a baby?</p><p>Yes, it's possible with newly developed technology to create sperm from stem cells.  However, it has never been demonstrated in humans and may be quite unsafe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Many of the " inane " questions in the article illustrate the stupidity of the journalist who wrote the article .
Most of these questions are legitimate , with a legitimate answer.Some examples : Can you put peroxide in your ear ? Actually , you can use it to remove earwax and to disinfect your ear if you went swimming in dirty water .
It 's a perfectly safe , legitimate use.Am I going in labour ? Actually , other pains can be mistaken for labor , and it takes hours to develop in many women .
Perhaps you 're a woman , and you want to know if that abdominal pain was your first contraction or just a GI problem.Am I having a heart attack ? Again , it 's possible to mistake heartburn and cracked ribs for a heart attack .
Maybe you should see what the symptoms are before you blow $ 300 at the Emergency Room.Why ca n't black people swim ?
Why ca n't white people dance ?
Both must be stereotypical behaviors , and maybe there is a reason why it can seem like both are true.Can you drink your own urine ? Again , a legitimate question .
In a desperate situation , drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions .
It 's commonly mentioned in media.Why would a pregnancy test be negative ? Yes , it 's possible to get a negative test and be pregnant.Can two women make a baby ? Yes , it 's possible with newly developed technology to create sperm from stem cells .
However , it has never been demonstrated in humans and may be quite unsafe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many of the "inane" questions in the article illustrate the stupidity of the journalist who wrote the article.
Most of these questions are legitimate, with a legitimate answer.Some examples :Can you put peroxide in your ear?Actually, you can use it to remove earwax and to disinfect your ear if you went swimming in dirty water.
It's a perfectly safe, legitimate use.Am I going in labour?Actually, other pains can be mistaken for labor, and it takes hours to develop in many women.
Perhaps you're a woman, and you want to know if that abdominal pain was your first contraction or just a GI problem.Am I having a heart attack?Again, it's possible to mistake heartburn and cracked ribs for a heart attack.
Maybe you should see what the symptoms are before you blow $300 at the Emergency Room.Why can't black people swim?
Why can't white people dance?
Both must be stereotypical behaviors, and maybe there is a reason why it can seem like both are true.Can you drink your own urine?Again, a legitimate question.
In a desperate situation, drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions.
It's commonly mentioned in media.Why would a pregnancy test be negative?Yes, it's possible to get a negative test and be pregnant.Can two women make a baby?Yes, it's possible with newly developed technology to create sperm from stem cells.
However, it has never been demonstrated in humans and may be quite unsafe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011452</id>
	<title>Re:Many of these questions are legitimate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257513420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><tt>Can you drink your own urine?</tt><br><i>Again, a legitimate question. In a desperate situation, drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions.</i><br>Drinking seawater or urine is a VERY short-term solution to survival. If you don't see the probability of being supplied with LOTS of fresh water very soon afterwards, the amount of work your kidneys just had to do will now be repeated and compounded. To wash out that junk again is going to take EVEN MORE fresh water. In other words, in the long run it would DECREASE survival prospects (think: USS Indianapolis).</p><p>A solar still can turn nearly any aqueous solution into potable water. Learn how to make one ahead of time and have the materials with you or (as a good mariner's survival kit does) make sure one is included in your gear.</p><p>gewg\_</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you drink your own urine ? Again , a legitimate question .
In a desperate situation , drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions.Drinking seawater or urine is a VERY short-term solution to survival .
If you do n't see the probability of being supplied with LOTS of fresh water very soon afterwards , the amount of work your kidneys just had to do will now be repeated and compounded .
To wash out that junk again is going to take EVEN MORE fresh water .
In other words , in the long run it would DECREASE survival prospects ( think : USS Indianapolis ) .A solar still can turn nearly any aqueous solution into potable water .
Learn how to make one ahead of time and have the materials with you or ( as a good mariner 's survival kit does ) make sure one is included in your gear.gewg \ _</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you drink your own urine?Again, a legitimate question.
In a desperate situation, drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions.Drinking seawater or urine is a VERY short-term solution to survival.
If you don't see the probability of being supplied with LOTS of fresh water very soon afterwards, the amount of work your kidneys just had to do will now be repeated and compounded.
To wash out that junk again is going to take EVEN MORE fresh water.
In other words, in the long run it would DECREASE survival prospects (think: USS Indianapolis).A solar still can turn nearly any aqueous solution into potable water.
Learn how to make one ahead of time and have the materials with you or (as a good mariner's survival kit does) make sure one is included in your gear.gewg\_</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010552</id>
	<title>Here's another gem: Why is...</title>
	<author>Jorgandar</author>
	<datestamp>1257506160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...my poop green?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...my poop green ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...my poop green?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011176</id>
	<title>Re:Many of these questions are legitimate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257510660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...Can you drink your own urine?</p><p>Again, a legitimate question.  In a desperate situation, drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions.  It's commonly mentioned in media....</p></div><p>In a desperate situation where you have no access to any kind of water... but you have Google. WTF?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Can you drink your own urine ? Again , a legitimate question .
In a desperate situation , drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions .
It 's commonly mentioned in media....In a desperate situation where you have no access to any kind of water... but you have Google .
WTF ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Can you drink your own urine?Again, a legitimate question.
In a desperate situation, drinking your own urine may extend your survival under some environmental conditions.
It's commonly mentioned in media....In a desperate situation where you have no access to any kind of water... but you have Google.
WTF?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604</id>
	<title>Obligatory George Carlin Quote</title>
	<author>kidblast</author>
	<datestamp>1257540480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Think of how stupid the average person is , and realize half of them are stupider than that .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011530</id>
	<title>Re:Jesus</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257514140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know you're joking, but as a public information service: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immaculate\_conception Not what you seem to think.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know you 're joking , but as a public information service : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immaculate \ _conception Not what you seem to think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know you're joking, but as a public information service: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immaculate\_conception Not what you seem to think.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008708</id>
	<title>Babies</title>
	<author>endianx</author>
	<datestamp>1257540840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In regards to "Can two women make a baby?":<br>
<br>
<a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/08/02/02/0244213/Sperm-Made-From-Female-Bone-Marrow-Men-Obsolete" title="slashdot.org">http://science.slashdot.org/story/08/02/02/0244213/Sperm-Made-From-Female-Bone-Marrow-Men-Obsolete</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>In regards to " Can two women make a baby ?
" : http : //science.slashdot.org/story/08/02/02/0244213/Sperm-Made-From-Female-Bone-Marrow-Men-Obsolete [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In regards to "Can two women make a baby?
":

http://science.slashdot.org/story/08/02/02/0244213/Sperm-Made-From-Female-Bone-Marrow-Men-Obsolete [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30012922
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30014808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30013528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30012088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009644
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30018238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009874
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30019228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30013032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30013682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30014796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30014082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30014180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30020802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009862
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30019712
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30013286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30061890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30013596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_167239_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008756
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010596
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009874
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009596
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009426
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011402
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30014180
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30019712
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30014082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30013596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30014808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011452
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30020802
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009864
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010952
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008620
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30012088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30013528
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30018238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009184
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30012922
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009070
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009942
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011766
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30013032
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010400
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010440
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010814
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011074
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010946
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30061890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008906
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010358
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009204
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30013286
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30011774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30019228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010150
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30010746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008992
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30013682
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009880
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30014796
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008776
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008608
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30008900
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_167239.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_167239.30009068
</commentlist>
</conversation>
