<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_06_0837206</id>
	<title>Fear Detector To Sniff Out Terrorists</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1257513180000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"Evidence that the smell of fear is real was uncovered by US scientists last year who <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/dec/03/fear-smell-pheromone">studied the underarm secretions of 20 terrified novice skydivers</a> and found that people <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/6481635/Device-that-smells-human-fear-could-identify-terrorists.html">appear to respond unconsciously to the sweat smell of a frightened person</a>. Now the Telegraph reports that researchers hope a 'fear detector' will make it possible to identify individuals at check points who are up to no good. 'The challenge lies in the characterization and identification of the specific chemical that gives away the signature of human fear, especially the fear in relation to criminal acts,' says Professor Tong Tun at City University London, who leads the team developing security sensor systems that can detect the human fear pheromone. The project will look at potential obstacles to the device, such as the <a href="http://www.theengineer.co.uk/Articles/313728/Sensor+to+detect+fear+pheromone.htm">effects of perfume and the variances in pheromone production</a> and if the initial 18-month feasibility study is successful, the first detectors could be developed in the next two to three years. 'I do not see any particular reason why similar sensor techniques cannot be expanded to identify human smells by race, age or gender to build a profile of a criminal during or after an incident,' Tong added."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " Evidence that the smell of fear is real was uncovered by US scientists last year who studied the underarm secretions of 20 terrified novice skydivers and found that people appear to respond unconsciously to the sweat smell of a frightened person .
Now the Telegraph reports that researchers hope a 'fear detector ' will make it possible to identify individuals at check points who are up to no good .
'The challenge lies in the characterization and identification of the specific chemical that gives away the signature of human fear , especially the fear in relation to criminal acts, ' says Professor Tong Tun at City University London , who leads the team developing security sensor systems that can detect the human fear pheromone .
The project will look at potential obstacles to the device , such as the effects of perfume and the variances in pheromone production and if the initial 18-month feasibility study is successful , the first detectors could be developed in the next two to three years .
'I do not see any particular reason why similar sensor techniques can not be expanded to identify human smells by race , age or gender to build a profile of a criminal during or after an incident, ' Tong added .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "Evidence that the smell of fear is real was uncovered by US scientists last year who studied the underarm secretions of 20 terrified novice skydivers and found that people appear to respond unconsciously to the sweat smell of a frightened person.
Now the Telegraph reports that researchers hope a 'fear detector' will make it possible to identify individuals at check points who are up to no good.
'The challenge lies in the characterization and identification of the specific chemical that gives away the signature of human fear, especially the fear in relation to criminal acts,' says Professor Tong Tun at City University London, who leads the team developing security sensor systems that can detect the human fear pheromone.
The project will look at potential obstacles to the device, such as the effects of perfume and the variances in pheromone production and if the initial 18-month feasibility study is successful, the first detectors could be developed in the next two to three years.
'I do not see any particular reason why similar sensor techniques cannot be expanded to identify human smells by race, age or gender to build a profile of a criminal during or after an incident,' Tong added.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004880</id>
	<title>You Sir</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257517500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Smell like you're up to something!</p><p>Seriously though I wonder if it will be able to resolve the difference between somebody who is simply nervous and somebody harboring nefarious intentions. How many times have you wondered if the detectors would sense something (anything) on your person as you pass through them. Same with the Random Breath Test - you know you haven't had a drink in a while, but you think back to what you've had to eat/drink for the day<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>I guess it would be easy to test though; set up some groups, give one an item which "is" illegal, give one an item which "shouldn't" be illegal. See whether or not the device can differentiate between both groups.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Smell like you 're up to something ! Seriously though I wonder if it will be able to resolve the difference between somebody who is simply nervous and somebody harboring nefarious intentions .
How many times have you wondered if the detectors would sense something ( anything ) on your person as you pass through them .
Same with the Random Breath Test - you know you have n't had a drink in a while , but you think back to what you 've had to eat/drink for the day ; ) I guess it would be easy to test though ; set up some groups , give one an item which " is " illegal , give one an item which " should n't " be illegal .
See whether or not the device can differentiate between both groups .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Smell like you're up to something!Seriously though I wonder if it will be able to resolve the difference between somebody who is simply nervous and somebody harboring nefarious intentions.
How many times have you wondered if the detectors would sense something (anything) on your person as you pass through them.
Same with the Random Breath Test - you know you haven't had a drink in a while, but you think back to what you've had to eat/drink for the day ;)I guess it would be easy to test though; set up some groups, give one an item which "is" illegal, give one an item which "shouldn't" be illegal.
See whether or not the device can differentiate between both groups.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005796</id>
	<title>Re:Doubleplusgood?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257523920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Isn't this a step towards thought crime?
"He's scared, arrest him!"</p></div></blockquote><p>
Shienarier!   Shienarier 185368!  Hands off keyboard!
</p><p>
Unbook says:
"His  earlier thought returned to him: probably she was not
actually a member of  the  Thought  Police,  but  then  it  was
precisely  the  amateur spy who was the greatest danger of all.
He did not know how long she  had  been  looking  at  him,  but
perhaps  for  as much as five minutes, and it was possible that
his features had not  been  perfectly  under  control.  It  was
terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in
any  public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest
thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an  unconscious  look
of  anxiety,  a habit of muttering to yourself -- anything that
carried with  it  the  suggestion  of  abnormality,  of  having
something  to hide. In any case, to wear an improper expression
on your face (to look incredulous when a victory was announced,
for example) was itself a punishable offence. There was even  a
word for it in Newspeak: facecrime, it was called."
</p><p>
Thoughcrime?  Sheinarirer unbellyfeel Amsoc, but plusgood duckspeaker AC rectify fullwise.
</p><p>
Slashdotart 1433716 unabout thoughtcrime.  Unabout unfacecrime.  (<a href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/30/1333210" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">Facecrime</a> [slashdot.org] lastyear HomeSec project.  2008think is oldthink!)
</p><p>
Read more unbook:
</p><p>
"They emptied their glasses, and a moment later Julia stood
up to go. O'Brien took a small box from the top  of  a  cabinet
and  handed  her a flat white tablet which he told her to place
on her tongue. <b>It  was  important,  he  said,  not  to  go  out
smelling  of  wine</b>: the lift attendants were very observant."
</p><p>
2010 not year of thoughtcrime or facecrime.  2010 year of scentcrime!
</p><p>
For the Party,
AC.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this a step towards thought crime ?
" He 's scared , arrest him !
" Shienarier !
Shienarier 185368 !
Hands off keyboard !
Unbook says : " His earlier thought returned to him : probably she was not actually a member of the Thought Police , but then it was precisely the amateur spy who was the greatest danger of all .
He did not know how long she had been looking at him , but perhaps for as much as five minutes , and it was possible that his features had not been perfectly under control .
It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen .
The smallest thing could give you away .
A nervous tic , an unconscious look of anxiety , a habit of muttering to yourself -- anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality , of having something to hide .
In any case , to wear an improper expression on your face ( to look incredulous when a victory was announced , for example ) was itself a punishable offence .
There was even a word for it in Newspeak : facecrime , it was called .
" Thoughcrime ?
Sheinarirer unbellyfeel Amsoc , but plusgood duckspeaker AC rectify fullwise .
Slashdotart 1433716 unabout thoughtcrime .
Unabout unfacecrime .
( Facecrime [ slashdot.org ] lastyear HomeSec project .
2008think is oldthink !
) Read more unbook : " They emptied their glasses , and a moment later Julia stood up to go .
O'Brien took a small box from the top of a cabinet and handed her a flat white tablet which he told her to place on her tongue .
It was important , he said , not to go out smelling of wine : the lift attendants were very observant .
" 2010 not year of thoughtcrime or facecrime .
2010 year of scentcrime !
For the Party , AC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this a step towards thought crime?
"He's scared, arrest him!
"
Shienarier!
Shienarier 185368!
Hands off keyboard!
Unbook says:
"His  earlier thought returned to him: probably she was not
actually a member of  the  Thought  Police,  but  then  it  was
precisely  the  amateur spy who was the greatest danger of all.
He did not know how long she  had  been  looking  at  him,  but
perhaps  for  as much as five minutes, and it was possible that
his features had not  been  perfectly  under  control.
It  was
terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in
any  public place or within range of a telescreen.
The smallest
thing could give you away.
A nervous tic, an  unconscious  look
of  anxiety,  a habit of muttering to yourself -- anything that
carried with  it  the  suggestion  of  abnormality,  of  having
something  to hide.
In any case, to wear an improper expression
on your face (to look incredulous when a victory was announced,
for example) was itself a punishable offence.
There was even  a
word for it in Newspeak: facecrime, it was called.
"

Thoughcrime?
Sheinarirer unbellyfeel Amsoc, but plusgood duckspeaker AC rectify fullwise.
Slashdotart 1433716 unabout thoughtcrime.
Unabout unfacecrime.
(Facecrime [slashdot.org] lastyear HomeSec project.
2008think is oldthink!
)

Read more unbook:

"They emptied their glasses, and a moment later Julia stood
up to go.
O'Brien took a small box from the top  of  a  cabinet
and  handed  her a flat white tablet which he told her to place
on her tongue.
It  was  important,  he  said,  not  to  go  out
smelling  of  wine: the lift attendants were very observant.
"

2010 not year of thoughtcrime or facecrime.
2010 year of scentcrime!
For the Party,
AC.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007648</id>
	<title>Re:No... no, you won't...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257535620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's the new stuff, kid.  Durazac 15.  It makes Prozac feel like a decaf latte.  Want a couple?  I've got jars.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's the new stuff , kid .
Durazac 15 .
It makes Prozac feel like a decaf latte .
Want a couple ?
I 've got jars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's the new stuff, kid.
Durazac 15.
It makes Prozac feel like a decaf latte.
Want a couple?
I've got jars.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005158</id>
	<title>Re:Positive Feedback Loop?</title>
	<author>Allicorn</author>
	<datestamp>1257519480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>4. All citizens are now afraid of the detector. Except terrorists.</p><p>5. Set detector to "if you're not trembling, you're guilty" mode.</p><p>6. Citizens learn that detector is now only interested in people who aren't afraid of getting stopped</p><p>7. Citizens no longer afraid. Back to square one!</p><p>8. Foxes and rabbits! XD</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>4 .
All citizens are now afraid of the detector .
Except terrorists.5 .
Set detector to " if you 're not trembling , you 're guilty " mode.6 .
Citizens learn that detector is now only interested in people who are n't afraid of getting stopped7 .
Citizens no longer afraid .
Back to square one ! 8 .
Foxes and rabbits !
XD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4.
All citizens are now afraid of the detector.
Except terrorists.5.
Set detector to "if you're not trembling, you're guilty" mode.6.
Citizens learn that detector is now only interested in people who aren't afraid of getting stopped7.
Citizens no longer afraid.
Back to square one!8.
Foxes and rabbits!
XD</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006040</id>
	<title>Re:Underarms?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257525780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For goodness sake, if you catch these people, don't release them!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For goodness sake , if you catch these people , do n't release them !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For goodness sake, if you catch these people, don't release them!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004862</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007324</id>
	<title>Skydivers have known this for years...</title>
	<author>guru312</author>
	<datestamp>1257533520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've been a parachute instructor, jumpmaster and jump pilot since 1972. This issue is old news for us.<div><p>

I searched DropZone.com and found this link: <a href="http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post\_view\_flat;post=2005174;page=2;sb=post\_latest\_reply;so=ASC;mh=25;" title="dropzone.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post\_view\_flat;post=2005174;page=2;sb=post\_latest\_reply;so=ASC;mh=25;</a> [dropzone.com] which actually may not work for folks without an account on DZ.com.</p><div><p>

As so many posters have mentioned the false positives which will be created by such a nutty idea will be huge. A huge percentage of people are terrified of flying. Even I hate it...unless I'm flying the plane or wearing a parachute.</p><div><p>

One of the dumbest applications of physiological response knowledge I've ever read.</p><div><p>

Where is my parachute? I want off this the planet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been a parachute instructor , jumpmaster and jump pilot since 1972 .
This issue is old news for us .
I searched DropZone.com and found this link : http : //www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi ? do = post \ _view \ _flat ; post = 2005174 ; page = 2 ; sb = post \ _latest \ _reply ; so = ASC ; mh = 25 ; [ dropzone.com ] which actually may not work for folks without an account on DZ.com .
As so many posters have mentioned the false positives which will be created by such a nutty idea will be huge .
A huge percentage of people are terrified of flying .
Even I hate it...unless I 'm flying the plane or wearing a parachute .
One of the dumbest applications of physiological response knowledge I 've ever read .
Where is my parachute ?
I want off this the planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been a parachute instructor, jumpmaster and jump pilot since 1972.
This issue is old news for us.
I searched DropZone.com and found this link: http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post\_view\_flat;post=2005174;page=2;sb=post\_latest\_reply;so=ASC;mh=25; [dropzone.com] which actually may not work for folks without an account on DZ.com.
As so many posters have mentioned the false positives which will be created by such a nutty idea will be huge.
A huge percentage of people are terrified of flying.
Even I hate it...unless I'm flying the plane or wearing a parachute.
One of the dumbest applications of physiological response knowledge I've ever read.
Where is my parachute?
I want off this the planet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007624</id>
	<title>this just in, ANTIPERSPERSPIRANT the newest threat</title>
	<author>schlick</author>
	<datestamp>1257535500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...to America!</p><p>So now you are a terrorist if you wear antiperspirant.  Because, if you're not a terrorist, then you have nothing to be afraid of, so if you are wearing antiperspirant, you must have something your hiding and you ARE afraid then you MUST be a terrorist.</p><p>Antiperspirant, the latest terrorist threat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...to America ! So now you are a terrorist if you wear antiperspirant .
Because , if you 're not a terrorist , then you have nothing to be afraid of , so if you are wearing antiperspirant , you must have something your hiding and you ARE afraid then you MUST be a terrorist.Antiperspirant , the latest terrorist threat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...to America!So now you are a terrorist if you wear antiperspirant.
Because, if you're not a terrorist, then you have nothing to be afraid of, so if you are wearing antiperspirant, you must have something your hiding and you ARE afraid then you MUST be a terrorist.Antiperspirant, the latest terrorist threat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005134</id>
	<title>False Positives</title>
	<author>mbone</author>
	<datestamp>1257519420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>False positives will kill this. Plus, anything that can be measured can be trained for (see, e.g., "lie" detectors).</p><p>But, this will be good for some research grants, and maybe even an expensive pilot project, so if you believe that the best security metric is the amount of money wasted, it's all for the good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>False positives will kill this .
Plus , anything that can be measured can be trained for ( see , e.g. , " lie " detectors ) .But , this will be good for some research grants , and maybe even an expensive pilot project , so if you believe that the best security metric is the amount of money wasted , it 's all for the good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>False positives will kill this.
Plus, anything that can be measured can be trained for (see, e.g., "lie" detectors).But, this will be good for some research grants, and maybe even an expensive pilot project, so if you believe that the best security metric is the amount of money wasted, it's all for the good.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007692</id>
	<title>Re:Love these comments...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257535860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A terrorist is going to be a LOT more afraid of getting on that plane and detonating a bomb on it,</p></div><p>
And there is the fallacious assumption of your entire argument. You assume that there even are people trying to get on planes with bombs these days. Further more, you assume that there are enough of those people, in comparison to innocent travelers, to pose a significant risk. Honestly, how many airplane hijackings/terrorist acts have you heard of since 9/11? Any 'terrorist' (or activist or freedom fighter or whatever) that has any shred of intelligence whatsoever is not going to be trying to use airplanes for terror attacks after 9/11. It is unoriginal, and therefore risky. I would wager (no, its not fact, I know that) that the next significant report of terrorism (meaning X many people died) is going to come in some form of an attack that was completely unexpected and unaccounted for.
<br> <br>
Beefing up airport security to extremely high levels (some security is necessary and should exist) is a very flashy attempt to close a barn door, lock it, nail-board it shut, and put a bomb shelter around it after the horse has already left.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A terrorist is going to be a LOT more afraid of getting on that plane and detonating a bomb on it , And there is the fallacious assumption of your entire argument .
You assume that there even are people trying to get on planes with bombs these days .
Further more , you assume that there are enough of those people , in comparison to innocent travelers , to pose a significant risk .
Honestly , how many airplane hijackings/terrorist acts have you heard of since 9/11 ?
Any 'terrorist ' ( or activist or freedom fighter or whatever ) that has any shred of intelligence whatsoever is not going to be trying to use airplanes for terror attacks after 9/11 .
It is unoriginal , and therefore risky .
I would wager ( no , its not fact , I know that ) that the next significant report of terrorism ( meaning X many people died ) is going to come in some form of an attack that was completely unexpected and unaccounted for .
Beefing up airport security to extremely high levels ( some security is necessary and should exist ) is a very flashy attempt to close a barn door , lock it , nail-board it shut , and put a bomb shelter around it after the horse has already left .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A terrorist is going to be a LOT more afraid of getting on that plane and detonating a bomb on it,
And there is the fallacious assumption of your entire argument.
You assume that there even are people trying to get on planes with bombs these days.
Further more, you assume that there are enough of those people, in comparison to innocent travelers, to pose a significant risk.
Honestly, how many airplane hijackings/terrorist acts have you heard of since 9/11?
Any 'terrorist' (or activist or freedom fighter or whatever) that has any shred of intelligence whatsoever is not going to be trying to use airplanes for terror attacks after 9/11.
It is unoriginal, and therefore risky.
I would wager (no, its not fact, I know that) that the next significant report of terrorism (meaning X many people died) is going to come in some form of an attack that was completely unexpected and unaccounted for.
Beefing up airport security to extremely high levels (some security is necessary and should exist) is a very flashy attempt to close a barn door, lock it, nail-board it shut, and put a bomb shelter around it after the horse has already left.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005348</id>
	<title>Where is the standard response?</title>
	<author>sherpajohn</author>
	<datestamp>1257520920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Usually for these loss of freedom stories, we get the bleated "If you aren't doing anything wrong you have nothing to be afraid of" response. Where is it? Wait, what's that I smell? Scared sheeple?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Usually for these loss of freedom stories , we get the bleated " If you are n't doing anything wrong you have nothing to be afraid of " response .
Where is it ?
Wait , what 's that I smell ?
Scared sheeple ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Usually for these loss of freedom stories, we get the bleated "If you aren't doing anything wrong you have nothing to be afraid of" response.
Where is it?
Wait, what's that I smell?
Scared sheeple?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007226</id>
	<title>can we make stupidity a crime, please?</title>
	<author>Tom</author>
	<datestamp>1257532920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Great. So they will now sort out all the:
<ul>
<li>business travellers who are afraid of losing their jobs if this meeting doesn't go well</li>
<li>people with connecting flights, afraid of missing it because this one's already delayed half an hour</li>
<li>young people with love trouble, afraid of losing their boy/girlfriend</li>
<li>everyone who's afraid of flying (which are more people than you usually think)</li>
<li>people with valuable data on their notebooks, afraid that the new border laws mean the customs idiots will take the notebook apart for "inspection" and ruin it (or never return it)</li>
<li>and a long list of other people afraid of something that I missed</li>
</ul><p>
What they will miss:
</p><ul>
<li>frequent travellers who are just bored</li>
<li>terrorists, who aren't afraid but happy to die for their cause as soon as the laughable "security" is over doing cavity searches on all the perfectly innocent people</li>
</ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great .
So they will now sort out all the : business travellers who are afraid of losing their jobs if this meeting does n't go well people with connecting flights , afraid of missing it because this one 's already delayed half an hour young people with love trouble , afraid of losing their boy/girlfriend everyone who 's afraid of flying ( which are more people than you usually think ) people with valuable data on their notebooks , afraid that the new border laws mean the customs idiots will take the notebook apart for " inspection " and ruin it ( or never return it ) and a long list of other people afraid of something that I missed What they will miss : frequent travellers who are just bored terrorists , who are n't afraid but happy to die for their cause as soon as the laughable " security " is over doing cavity searches on all the perfectly innocent people</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great.
So they will now sort out all the:

business travellers who are afraid of losing their jobs if this meeting doesn't go well
people with connecting flights, afraid of missing it because this one's already delayed half an hour
young people with love trouble, afraid of losing their boy/girlfriend
everyone who's afraid of flying (which are more people than you usually think)
people with valuable data on their notebooks, afraid that the new border laws mean the customs idiots will take the notebook apart for "inspection" and ruin it (or never return it)
and a long list of other people afraid of something that I missed

What they will miss:

frequent travellers who are just bored
terrorists, who aren't afraid but happy to die for their cause as soon as the laughable "security" is over doing cavity searches on all the perfectly innocent people
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005516</id>
	<title>to quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257522180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"One is how to discover, against his will, what another human being is thinking, and the other is how to kill several hundred million people in a few seconds without giving warning beforehand. In so far as scientific research still continues, this is its subject matter.", 1984.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" One is how to discover , against his will , what another human being is thinking , and the other is how to kill several hundred million people in a few seconds without giving warning beforehand .
In so far as scientific research still continues , this is its subject matter .
" , 1984 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"One is how to discover, against his will, what another human being is thinking, and the other is how to kill several hundred million people in a few seconds without giving warning beforehand.
In so far as scientific research still continues, this is its subject matter.
", 1984.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004940</id>
	<title>Positive Feedback Loop?</title>
	<author>rotide</author>
	<datestamp>1257517920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1: Develop System to detect when someone is "afraid"</p><p>2: Let citizens know that those who are "afraid" will be detected, detained and questioned for "citizen safety".</p><p>3: Citizens are now afraid to go through on the idea that maybe they will somehow set off the alarm.</p><p>Tons of false positives.  After the first story of a false positive, some people become afraid of being a false positive as well.  As more and more stories of false positives arise, more and more people become afraid and become more false positives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 : Develop System to detect when someone is " afraid " 2 : Let citizens know that those who are " afraid " will be detected , detained and questioned for " citizen safety " .3 : Citizens are now afraid to go through on the idea that maybe they will somehow set off the alarm.Tons of false positives .
After the first story of a false positive , some people become afraid of being a false positive as well .
As more and more stories of false positives arise , more and more people become afraid and become more false positives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1: Develop System to detect when someone is "afraid"2: Let citizens know that those who are "afraid" will be detected, detained and questioned for "citizen safety".3: Citizens are now afraid to go through on the idea that maybe they will somehow set off the alarm.Tons of false positives.
After the first story of a false positive, some people become afraid of being a false positive as well.
As more and more stories of false positives arise, more and more people become afraid and become more false positives.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30012314</id>
	<title>Re:Underarms?!</title>
	<author>pla</author>
	<datestamp>1257525900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>They were later released after it turned out they were simply wearing Axe deodorant</i> <br>
<br>
Clearly you haven't paid attention to the War on Ourselves yet...<br>
<br>
They wouldn't <i>release</i> them.  They'd deport them to Gitmo (closing... Riiiiiight, let me know
any year now when it actually happens) for Conspiracy to Make Defense Contractors Look Bad.  Or perhaps
Possession of a Substance Banned by Secret Laws You Can't Know About.<br>
<br>
Or they might stick with what they know best and just make something absurd up on the spot, taze your ass, then
release you with no charges exactly 17 seconds after your flight takes off without you...  Why change from a good
routine when it works so well to keep us "safe" from old ladies with nail clippers and 4oz bottles of hand lotion?</htmltext>
<tokenext>They were later released after it turned out they were simply wearing Axe deodorant Clearly you have n't paid attention to the War on Ourselves yet.. . They would n't release them .
They 'd deport them to Gitmo ( closing... Riiiiiight , let me know any year now when it actually happens ) for Conspiracy to Make Defense Contractors Look Bad .
Or perhaps Possession of a Substance Banned by Secret Laws You Ca n't Know About .
Or they might stick with what they know best and just make something absurd up on the spot , taze your ass , then release you with no charges exactly 17 seconds after your flight takes off without you... Why change from a good routine when it works so well to keep us " safe " from old ladies with nail clippers and 4oz bottles of hand lotion ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They were later released after it turned out they were simply wearing Axe deodorant 

Clearly you haven't paid attention to the War on Ourselves yet...

They wouldn't release them.
They'd deport them to Gitmo (closing... Riiiiiight, let me know
any year now when it actually happens) for Conspiracy to Make Defense Contractors Look Bad.
Or perhaps
Possession of a Substance Banned by Secret Laws You Can't Know About.
Or they might stick with what they know best and just make something absurd up on the spot, taze your ass, then
release you with no charges exactly 17 seconds after your flight takes off without you...  Why change from a good
routine when it works so well to keep us "safe" from old ladies with nail clippers and 4oz bottles of hand lotion?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004862</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005114</id>
	<title>The sequel to thoughtcrime:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257519240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Smellcrime? (Or would that be stinkcrime to rhyme with thinkcrime?)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Smellcrime ?
( Or would that be stinkcrime to rhyme with thinkcrime ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Smellcrime?
(Or would that be stinkcrime to rhyme with thinkcrime?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004990</id>
	<title>Let's Be Serious</title>
	<author>Voulnet</author>
	<datestamp>1257518280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The officers would only pull Arab-looking dudes, and many of those dudes might produce fear signals not because of terrorism, but because they're afraid of being treated badly at US airports like many of their brethren are.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The officers would only pull Arab-looking dudes , and many of those dudes might produce fear signals not because of terrorism , but because they 're afraid of being treated badly at US airports like many of their brethren are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The officers would only pull Arab-looking dudes, and many of those dudes might produce fear signals not because of terrorism, but because they're afraid of being treated badly at US airports like many of their brethren are.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006282</id>
	<title>I for one approve of the</title>
	<author>nimbius</author>
	<datestamp>1257527280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>use of fear-detectors! why stop there when so many more technologies could help! a few more ideas include:<br> <br>
-Phrenologists at the airport to determine if you match the description of a rapscallion or a evil-doer<br>
<br>
-E-Meters to determine if youre under sinister influence of XENU<br> <br>
-Dr jebediah's fiend evaluator and dastardly deed prognosticator<br> <br>
-the divining rod of truth and justice<br> <br>
-immolations in concourse C and a drowning pool in concourse L to verify the presence of terrorist witchcraft.</htmltext>
<tokenext>use of fear-detectors !
why stop there when so many more technologies could help !
a few more ideas include : -Phrenologists at the airport to determine if you match the description of a rapscallion or a evil-doer -E-Meters to determine if youre under sinister influence of XENU -Dr jebediah 's fiend evaluator and dastardly deed prognosticator -the divining rod of truth and justice -immolations in concourse C and a drowning pool in concourse L to verify the presence of terrorist witchcraft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>use of fear-detectors!
why stop there when so many more technologies could help!
a few more ideas include: 
-Phrenologists at the airport to determine if you match the description of a rapscallion or a evil-doer

-E-Meters to determine if youre under sinister influence of XENU 
-Dr jebediah's fiend evaluator and dastardly deed prognosticator 
-the divining rod of truth and justice 
-immolations in concourse C and a drowning pool in concourse L to verify the presence of terrorist witchcraft.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004856</id>
	<title>Re:Detects terrorists...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257517320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or young men who are afraid that their dreams for a virgin will be confused with somebody else's dreams of 71 virgins.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or young men who are afraid that their dreams for a virgin will be confused with somebody else 's dreams of 71 virgins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or young men who are afraid that their dreams for a virgin will be confused with somebody else's dreams of 71 virgins.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30008098</id>
	<title>Gerbils were used this way once....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257538200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1312843/MI5s-secret-plan-to-recruit-gerbils-as-spycatchers.html</p><p>Excerpt: "MI5 considered using a team of highly-trained gerbils to detect spies and terrorists flying into Britain during the 1970s,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..."</p><p>They have a very keen sense of smell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1312843/MI5s-secret-plan-to-recruit-gerbils-as-spycatchers.htmlExcerpt : " MI5 considered using a team of highly-trained gerbils to detect spies and terrorists flying into Britain during the 1970s , ... " They have a very keen sense of smell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1312843/MI5s-secret-plan-to-recruit-gerbils-as-spycatchers.htmlExcerpt: "MI5 considered using a team of highly-trained gerbils to detect spies and terrorists flying into Britain during the 1970s, ..."They have a very keen sense of smell.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005322</id>
	<title>Good!</title>
	<author>codeButcher</author>
	<datestamp>1257520740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There will be no stinkin' terrorists on my plane. Thats nothing to be sniffed at.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There will be no stinkin ' terrorists on my plane .
Thats nothing to be sniffed at .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There will be no stinkin' terrorists on my plane.
Thats nothing to be sniffed at.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005048</id>
	<title>You'll probably catch...</title>
	<author>Überhund</author>
	<datestamp>1257518760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... a lot of people who are afraid of their boss, or authority figures in general, or airplanes, or<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... a lot of people who are afraid of their boss , or authority figures in general , or airplanes , or .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... a lot of people who are afraid of their boss, or authority figures in general, or airplanes, or ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005098</id>
	<title>Re:Detects terrorists...</title>
	<author>tapanitarvainen</author>
	<datestamp>1257519120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Guess it would work best in reverse: people who are *not* afraid are obvious psychopaths...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Guess it would work best in reverse : people who are * not * afraid are obvious psychopaths.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guess it would work best in reverse: people who are *not* afraid are obvious psychopaths...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006700</id>
	<title>This should be on failblog!</title>
	<author>suds</author>
	<datestamp>1257529800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.failblog.org/" title="failblog.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.failblog.org/</a> [failblog.org] 'nuf said.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.failblog.org/ [ failblog.org ] 'nuf said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.failblog.org/ [failblog.org] 'nuf said.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005156</id>
	<title>Love these comments...</title>
	<author>vistapwns</author>
	<datestamp>1257519480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Time to lose my Karma I guess...

A terrorist is going to be a LOT more afraid of getting on that plane and detonating a bomb on it, and possibly getting caught by security, than an average person is going to be afraid of flying or that his mom my discover his porn, or whatever other funny reasons you guys can come up with...

Second, even if there are false positives, I think that's expected by the scientists, nothing is 100\%, but if you can increase your odds of picking up a terrorist by some odd percent, and decrease false positives (because terrorists are a LOT more afraid I would think) then you have saved money, saved everyone's time, and increased safety.

As far as pranksters with bio-chem degrees, well, when this thing starts picking up a lot of false positives, those pranksters will probably be caught and we won't see much of that. (i.e. all the fear scent 'sprayed' people say they were all in parking lot B, then the security checks the cameras, and finds the car that sprayed them and those idiots get arrested.)

I think we should at least give it a chance before condemning the idea with condescending knee-jerkiness.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Time to lose my Karma I guess.. . A terrorist is going to be a LOT more afraid of getting on that plane and detonating a bomb on it , and possibly getting caught by security , than an average person is going to be afraid of flying or that his mom my discover his porn , or whatever other funny reasons you guys can come up with.. . Second , even if there are false positives , I think that 's expected by the scientists , nothing is 100 \ % , but if you can increase your odds of picking up a terrorist by some odd percent , and decrease false positives ( because terrorists are a LOT more afraid I would think ) then you have saved money , saved everyone 's time , and increased safety .
As far as pranksters with bio-chem degrees , well , when this thing starts picking up a lot of false positives , those pranksters will probably be caught and we wo n't see much of that .
( i.e. all the fear scent 'sprayed ' people say they were all in parking lot B , then the security checks the cameras , and finds the car that sprayed them and those idiots get arrested .
) I think we should at least give it a chance before condemning the idea with condescending knee-jerkiness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Time to lose my Karma I guess...

A terrorist is going to be a LOT more afraid of getting on that plane and detonating a bomb on it, and possibly getting caught by security, than an average person is going to be afraid of flying or that his mom my discover his porn, or whatever other funny reasons you guys can come up with...

Second, even if there are false positives, I think that's expected by the scientists, nothing is 100\%, but if you can increase your odds of picking up a terrorist by some odd percent, and decrease false positives (because terrorists are a LOT more afraid I would think) then you have saved money, saved everyone's time, and increased safety.
As far as pranksters with bio-chem degrees, well, when this thing starts picking up a lot of false positives, those pranksters will probably be caught and we won't see much of that.
(i.e. all the fear scent 'sprayed' people say they were all in parking lot B, then the security checks the cameras, and finds the car that sprayed them and those idiots get arrested.
)

I think we should at least give it a chance before condemning the idea with condescending knee-jerkiness.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005874</id>
	<title>The Government</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257524400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Be afraid, very afraid....</p><p>err, wait...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Be afraid , very afraid....err , wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Be afraid, very afraid....err, wait...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30008452</id>
	<title>Fighting a concept</title>
	<author>s1I3nc3</author>
	<datestamp>1257539760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>First of all, the whole "War on Terror" concept is laughable, that's like saying lets have a War on Depresson; you can not fight an abstract idea. Furthermore, the people in charge of fighting this "war" are fighting like they are trying to defeat an enemy, if we are truly fighting a war on terror then wouldn't the logical thing to defeat be terror? As long as we remain afraid, the terrorists win, we can not defeat terror as long as we remain terrified of it. You remember the quote, "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself"? Yes it's cliche, but it could not be applicable to where we stand today.</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First of all , the whole " War on Terror " concept is laughable , that 's like saying lets have a War on Depresson ; you can not fight an abstract idea .
Furthermore , the people in charge of fighting this " war " are fighting like they are trying to defeat an enemy , if we are truly fighting a war on terror then would n't the logical thing to defeat be terror ?
As long as we remain afraid , the terrorists win , we can not defeat terror as long as we remain terrified of it .
You remember the quote , " the only thing we have to fear is fear itself " ?
Yes it 's cliche , but it could not be applicable to where we stand today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First of all, the whole "War on Terror" concept is laughable, that's like saying lets have a War on Depresson; you can not fight an abstract idea.
Furthermore, the people in charge of fighting this "war" are fighting like they are trying to defeat an enemy, if we are truly fighting a war on terror then wouldn't the logical thing to defeat be terror?
As long as we remain afraid, the terrorists win, we can not defeat terror as long as we remain terrified of it.
You remember the quote, "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself"?
Yes it's cliche, but it could not be applicable to where we stand today.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005074</id>
	<title>I don't think so ...</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1257518940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
This whole idea doesn't pass the smell test.
</p><p>
But it COULD lead to the entire population of New Jersey, the armpit of America, being banned from flying.  Not having to sit next to them might be seen as a win.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This whole idea does n't pass the smell test .
But it COULD lead to the entire population of New Jersey , the armpit of America , being banned from flying .
Not having to sit next to them might be seen as a win .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
This whole idea doesn't pass the smell test.
But it COULD lead to the entire population of New Jersey, the armpit of America, being banned from flying.
Not having to sit next to them might be seen as a win.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005050</id>
	<title>Great</title>
	<author>MemoryDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1257518760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have been suffering on anxiety disorder now for the last 15 years, does that mean I will get an anal search every time I cross the border now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been suffering on anxiety disorder now for the last 15 years , does that mean I will get an anal search every time I cross the border now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been suffering on anxiety disorder now for the last 15 years, does that mean I will get an anal search every time I cross the border now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005146</id>
	<title>Future airports doubleplussafe!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257519420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Combined with <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/11/04/2340204" title="slashdot.org">Bomb Detecting Dowser Rods</a> [slashdot.org], what could <b>possibly</b> go wrong?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Combined with Bomb Detecting Dowser Rods [ slashdot.org ] , what could possibly go wrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Combined with Bomb Detecting Dowser Rods [slashdot.org], what could possibly go wrong?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006836</id>
	<title>What would it look like?</title>
	<author>RivenAleem</author>
	<datestamp>1257530700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The fear detector works by sniffing out underarm sweat? How about they just use divining rods? Terrorist + bomb detector in one!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The fear detector works by sniffing out underarm sweat ?
How about they just use divining rods ?
Terrorist + bomb detector in one !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fear detector works by sniffing out underarm sweat?
How about they just use divining rods?
Terrorist + bomb detector in one!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004962</id>
	<title>No... no, you won't...</title>
	<author>denzacar</author>
	<datestamp>1257518100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Detect terrorists, that is.</p><p>Not while there are anti-anxiety drugs out there.<br>What you will detect is a bunch of false positives that will keep you busy "detecting" while trucks loaded with bags of ammonium-nitrate explosive merrily (but calmly) pass you by.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Detect terrorists , that is.Not while there are anti-anxiety drugs out there.What you will detect is a bunch of false positives that will keep you busy " detecting " while trucks loaded with bags of ammonium-nitrate explosive merrily ( but calmly ) pass you by .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Detect terrorists, that is.Not while there are anti-anxiety drugs out there.What you will detect is a bunch of false positives that will keep you busy "detecting" while trucks loaded with bags of ammonium-nitrate explosive merrily (but calmly) pass you by.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005190</id>
	<title>So what happens?</title>
	<author>Dunbal</author>
	<datestamp>1257519720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The project will look at potential obstacles to the device, such as the effects of perfume </i></p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; And completely ignores the premise that a religious fanatic about to die for his god might not be afraid at all!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The project will look at potential obstacles to the device , such as the effects of perfume       And completely ignores the premise that a religious fanatic about to die for his god might not be afraid at all !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The project will look at potential obstacles to the device, such as the effects of perfume 
      And completely ignores the premise that a religious fanatic about to die for his god might not be afraid at all!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006090</id>
	<title>Along with reading a book, ...</title>
	<author>Orbijx</author>
	<datestamp>1257526020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This makes me wonder how it would handle a person who, in a novel moment, takes an antiperspirant and applies it everywhere that they could possibly sweat just an hour or two before they go through a fear detector.</p><p>Gives new meaning to the phrase "Wear deodorant, #@&amp;&amp;^!"</p><p>(It's called SpeedStick, it's not expensive.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This makes me wonder how it would handle a person who , in a novel moment , takes an antiperspirant and applies it everywhere that they could possibly sweat just an hour or two before they go through a fear detector.Gives new meaning to the phrase " Wear deodorant , # @ &amp;&amp; ^ !
" ( It 's called SpeedStick , it 's not expensive .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This makes me wonder how it would handle a person who, in a novel moment, takes an antiperspirant and applies it everywhere that they could possibly sweat just an hour or two before they go through a fear detector.Gives new meaning to the phrase "Wear deodorant, #@&amp;&amp;^!
"(It's called SpeedStick, it's not expensive.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005122</id>
	<title>bizniz iz bizniz</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257519300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This device could be useful in business negotiations. If you could smell the fear of the inept decision maker, perhaps you could use his fear of failure to buy a worthless device. It seems to work in Iraq where the Iraqi police are buying bomb seeking divining rods for as much as $60k each from a British company named, ATSC. </p><p> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/world/middleeast/04sensors.html" title="nytimes.com" rel="nofollow">Mad Bomb Sniffer Story</a> [nytimes.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This device could be useful in business negotiations .
If you could smell the fear of the inept decision maker , perhaps you could use his fear of failure to buy a worthless device .
It seems to work in Iraq where the Iraqi police are buying bomb seeking divining rods for as much as $ 60k each from a British company named , ATSC .
Mad Bomb Sniffer Story [ nytimes.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This device could be useful in business negotiations.
If you could smell the fear of the inept decision maker, perhaps you could use his fear of failure to buy a worthless device.
It seems to work in Iraq where the Iraqi police are buying bomb seeking divining rods for as much as $60k each from a British company named, ATSC.
Mad Bomb Sniffer Story [nytimes.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006452</id>
	<title>american civil character, 1933:</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1257528240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The only thing we have to fear is fear itself."</p><p>american civil character, 2009:</p><p>"We will sniff you if you have fear, so have no fear"</p><p>american civil character, 2085:</p><p>"The only thing we have to fear is rogue self-aware fear-sniffing robots"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The only thing we have to fear is fear itself .
" american civil character , 2009 : " We will sniff you if you have fear , so have no fear " american civil character , 2085 : " The only thing we have to fear is rogue self-aware fear-sniffing robots "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.
"american civil character, 2009:"We will sniff you if you have fear, so have no fear"american civil character, 2085:"The only thing we have to fear is rogue self-aware fear-sniffing robots"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30008278</id>
	<title>Fear of Security Measures?</title>
	<author>cheetah\_spottycat</author>
	<datestamp>1257538980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, what happens to those who are afraid of the fear detector?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , what happens to those who are afraid of the fear detector ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, what happens to those who are afraid of the fear detector?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005758</id>
	<title>Re:Probably will NOT work on terrorists</title>
	<author>uncledrax</author>
	<datestamp>1257523620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dunno.. I'm sure those skydivers made up their mind how things are will happen.. and even knowing that they stand a very very very very little change of dying, they can still exhibit Fear.</p><p>Also, even if the person in question had completely made peace with the fact they are gonna blow themselves up, what about the fear of being caught -before- being able to do the act? If you rot away in prison and get shivved, you're not a martyr, so you 'wouldn't get your heavenly reward'.. assuming you believe such poppycock in the first place.</p><p>The points about anti-anxiety drugs and the fact there will be sooo many false-positives for terrorists means that although this is neat stuff<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,they have a long way before being able to put it in airports for practical use as a security measure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dunno.. I 'm sure those skydivers made up their mind how things are will happen.. and even knowing that they stand a very very very very little change of dying , they can still exhibit Fear.Also , even if the person in question had completely made peace with the fact they are gon na blow themselves up , what about the fear of being caught -before- being able to do the act ?
If you rot away in prison and get shivved , you 're not a martyr , so you 'would n't get your heavenly reward'.. assuming you believe such poppycock in the first place.The points about anti-anxiety drugs and the fact there will be sooo many false-positives for terrorists means that although this is neat stuff ,they have a long way before being able to put it in airports for practical use as a security measure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dunno.. I'm sure those skydivers made up their mind how things are will happen.. and even knowing that they stand a very very very very little change of dying, they can still exhibit Fear.Also, even if the person in question had completely made peace with the fact they are gonna blow themselves up, what about the fear of being caught -before- being able to do the act?
If you rot away in prison and get shivved, you're not a martyr, so you 'wouldn't get your heavenly reward'.. assuming you believe such poppycock in the first place.The points about anti-anxiety drugs and the fact there will be sooo many false-positives for terrorists means that although this is neat stuff ,they have a long way before being able to put it in airports for practical use as a security measure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004868</id>
	<title>waste of time</title>
	<author>runyonave</author>
	<datestamp>1257517440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do scientist have nothing better to do nowadays. Fear is an emotiona that could be the result of hundreds of different causes. Fear from stress, fear of losing money, fear of an individual, fear of going to an intervew etc, etc. How do these scientist aim to differentiate fear of criminal activity from other causes.

Waste of time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do scientist have nothing better to do nowadays .
Fear is an emotiona that could be the result of hundreds of different causes .
Fear from stress , fear of losing money , fear of an individual , fear of going to an intervew etc , etc .
How do these scientist aim to differentiate fear of criminal activity from other causes .
Waste of time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do scientist have nothing better to do nowadays.
Fear is an emotiona that could be the result of hundreds of different causes.
Fear from stress, fear of losing money, fear of an individual, fear of going to an intervew etc, etc.
How do these scientist aim to differentiate fear of criminal activity from other causes.
Waste of time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30009422</id>
	<title>The Path to the Dark Side</title>
	<author>the darn</author>
	<datestamp>1257500700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fear leads to anger .
Anger leads to hate .
Hate leads to suffering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fear leads to anger.
Anger leads to hate.
Hate leads to suffering.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005320</id>
	<title>so, how about...</title>
	<author>hitmark</author>
	<datestamp>1257520740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>we just ground all aircrafts? get working on high speed rail and ships damn it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>we just ground all aircrafts ?
get working on high speed rail and ships damn it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we just ground all aircrafts?
get working on high speed rail and ships damn it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30014942</id>
	<title>Re:Last time I checked...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257617340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Being afraid isn't a crime, nor is it probable cause for a search.</i> </p><p>In an airport, probable cause has now been reduced to back-talking or otherwise pissing off anyone in any kind of uniform.</p><p>Or even getting cross with the non-uniformed. Don't believe me? Just stand up and yell, "You clumsy son of a bitch" at someone who bumps your elbow when you're holding a cup of hot coffee. I guarantee an armed response.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Being afraid is n't a crime , nor is it probable cause for a search .
In an airport , probable cause has now been reduced to back-talking or otherwise pissing off anyone in any kind of uniform.Or even getting cross with the non-uniformed .
Do n't believe me ?
Just stand up and yell , " You clumsy son of a bitch " at someone who bumps your elbow when you 're holding a cup of hot coffee .
I guarantee an armed response .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being afraid isn't a crime, nor is it probable cause for a search.
In an airport, probable cause has now been reduced to back-talking or otherwise pissing off anyone in any kind of uniform.Or even getting cross with the non-uniformed.
Don't believe me?
Just stand up and yell, "You clumsy son of a bitch" at someone who bumps your elbow when you're holding a cup of hot coffee.
I guarantee an armed response.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005598</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005046</id>
	<title>Terrorists have no fear</title>
	<author>Wormholio</author>
	<datestamp>1257518700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This will fail.   A dedicated terrorist has no fear, while a law-abiding citizen can now be in fear of being accused of what is essentially thought-crime.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This will fail .
A dedicated terrorist has no fear , while a law-abiding citizen can now be in fear of being accused of what is essentially thought-crime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will fail.
A dedicated terrorist has no fear, while a law-abiding citizen can now be in fear of being accused of what is essentially thought-crime.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005598</id>
	<title>Last time I checked...</title>
	<author>jcr</author>
	<datestamp>1257522660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Being afraid isn't a crime, nor is it probable cause for a search.</p><p>-jcr</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Being afraid is n't a crime , nor is it probable cause for a search.-jcr</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being afraid isn't a crime, nor is it probable cause for a search.-jcr</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30009952</id>
	<title>Re:Detects terrorists...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257502920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This seems unfair; I'm a psychopath who has never, ever bombed an airplane... except that one time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This seems unfair ; I 'm a psychopath who has never , ever bombed an airplane... except that one time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This seems unfair; I'm a psychopath who has never, ever bombed an airplane... except that one time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007644</id>
	<title>Why not really fix the problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257535560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The TSA Is a joke.  If you want to improve security make the airlines responsible especially their Execs and managers for anything that goes on in their planes.  Suddenly you will find that incedents drop through the floor.  We take too much of the responsibility and heave it on the government.  Let the air port be responsible for their airport and the airlines be responsible for their planes.  That way it will run effeicently and effectively or people with lot of money spend time in prison.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The TSA Is a joke .
If you want to improve security make the airlines responsible especially their Execs and managers for anything that goes on in their planes .
Suddenly you will find that incedents drop through the floor .
We take too much of the responsibility and heave it on the government .
Let the air port be responsible for their airport and the airlines be responsible for their planes .
That way it will run effeicently and effectively or people with lot of money spend time in prison .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The TSA Is a joke.
If you want to improve security make the airlines responsible especially their Execs and managers for anything that goes on in their planes.
Suddenly you will find that incedents drop through the floor.
We take too much of the responsibility and heave it on the government.
Let the air port be responsible for their airport and the airlines be responsible for their planes.
That way it will run effeicently and effectively or people with lot of money spend time in prison.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006572</id>
	<title>Re:Love these comments...</title>
	<author>smellsofbikes</author>
	<datestamp>1257528960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt;I think the scientists involved already know whether or not a terrorist is more scared than the average person,<p>
Why do you think that?  Scientists (such as they are) sell magnetic bracelets to cure arthritis, and presumably scientists made the <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/11/04/2340204/Iraq-Swears-By-Dowsing-Rod-Bomb-Detector?from=rss" title="slashdot.org">$40,000 dowsing rod bomb detectors</a> [slashdot.org] that people are buying in Iraq.  If you can make money selling useless stuff to stupid people, you sell useless stuff to stupid people.  In this case it works even better because it doesn't really matter much to them whether there are false positives: they'll just search everyone and this way it's another excuse to search more people.  It's all about deterrence and making people feel safer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I think the scientists involved already know whether or not a terrorist is more scared than the average person , Why do you think that ?
Scientists ( such as they are ) sell magnetic bracelets to cure arthritis , and presumably scientists made the $ 40,000 dowsing rod bomb detectors [ slashdot.org ] that people are buying in Iraq .
If you can make money selling useless stuff to stupid people , you sell useless stuff to stupid people .
In this case it works even better because it does n't really matter much to them whether there are false positives : they 'll just search everyone and this way it 's another excuse to search more people .
It 's all about deterrence and making people feel safer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;I think the scientists involved already know whether or not a terrorist is more scared than the average person,
Why do you think that?
Scientists (such as they are) sell magnetic bracelets to cure arthritis, and presumably scientists made the $40,000 dowsing rod bomb detectors [slashdot.org] that people are buying in Iraq.
If you can make money selling useless stuff to stupid people, you sell useless stuff to stupid people.
In this case it works even better because it doesn't really matter much to them whether there are false positives: they'll just search everyone and this way it's another excuse to search more people.
It's all about deterrence and making people feel safer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007320</id>
	<title>Re:No... no, you won't...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257533460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Not while there are anti-anxiety drugs out there.</p></div><p>Or say...</p><p>Antiperspirant.  Or maybe even deodorant?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not while there are anti-anxiety drugs out there.Or say...Antiperspirant .
Or maybe even deodorant ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not while there are anti-anxiety drugs out there.Or say...Antiperspirant.
Or maybe even deodorant?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30008898</id>
	<title>Totally wrong aproach.</title>
	<author>blind biker</author>
	<datestamp>1257498540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look, I am always worried when arriving at security control, even though I am 100\% legit. I feel intimidated, I worry that they'll keep me too long and I might miss boarding - I had to open my bag twice, because the cheese I was carrying looked suspicious on X-ray. So I'd trigger the sniffing machine.</p><p>On the other hand, a terrorist might be quite relaxed, because it's his/her nature. Or he/she might be a psychopath, and they feel no fear.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look , I am always worried when arriving at security control , even though I am 100 \ % legit .
I feel intimidated , I worry that they 'll keep me too long and I might miss boarding - I had to open my bag twice , because the cheese I was carrying looked suspicious on X-ray .
So I 'd trigger the sniffing machine.On the other hand , a terrorist might be quite relaxed , because it 's his/her nature .
Or he/she might be a psychopath , and they feel no fear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look, I am always worried when arriving at security control, even though I am 100\% legit.
I feel intimidated, I worry that they'll keep me too long and I might miss boarding - I had to open my bag twice, because the cheese I was carrying looked suspicious on X-ray.
So I'd trigger the sniffing machine.On the other hand, a terrorist might be quite relaxed, because it's his/her nature.
Or he/she might be a psychopath, and they feel no fear.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004798</id>
	<title>Detects terrorists...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257516960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... or people who are afraid of being suspected of terrorism</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... or people who are afraid of being suspected of terrorism</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... or people who are afraid of being suspected of terrorism</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005432</id>
	<title>Re:Love these comments...</title>
	<author>pehrs</author>
	<datestamp>1257521520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is the terrorist supposed to be afraid? Many of them have trained for years to do the hijacking, and fear is not what those who survived described. Besides, many of the terrorists here in Europe have been taking drugs to ensure top performance. So what you are looking for is not somebody scared out of his pants. You are looking for a calm professional on benzedrine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is the terrorist supposed to be afraid ?
Many of them have trained for years to do the hijacking , and fear is not what those who survived described .
Besides , many of the terrorists here in Europe have been taking drugs to ensure top performance .
So what you are looking for is not somebody scared out of his pants .
You are looking for a calm professional on benzedrine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is the terrorist supposed to be afraid?
Many of them have trained for years to do the hijacking, and fear is not what those who survived described.
Besides, many of the terrorists here in Europe have been taking drugs to ensure top performance.
So what you are looking for is not somebody scared out of his pants.
You are looking for a calm professional on benzedrine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004998</id>
	<title>Re:Profit!!!</title>
	<author>Lurker2288</author>
	<datestamp>1257518340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the first three steps would also qualify you to be a Batman villain.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the first three steps would also qualify you to be a Batman villain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the first three steps would also qualify you to be a Batman villain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30010594</id>
	<title>Xanax</title>
	<author>straponego</author>
	<datestamp>1257506460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Many people take Xanax while flying.  I'm tempted myself, not because I worry about the plane crashing, but because sitting on the tarmac for two hours with no air conditioning, crammed in next to some fat bastard with his shrieking kids, well, it doesn't suit me.<br><br>I don't see why the imaginary terrorists couldn't take Xanax or equivalent.  So really, what the "security" people should do is molest the people who aren't afraid, stressed, or angry.  Clearly something is wrong with those bastards.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Many people take Xanax while flying .
I 'm tempted myself , not because I worry about the plane crashing , but because sitting on the tarmac for two hours with no air conditioning , crammed in next to some fat bastard with his shrieking kids , well , it does n't suit me.I do n't see why the imaginary terrorists could n't take Xanax or equivalent .
So really , what the " security " people should do is molest the people who are n't afraid , stressed , or angry .
Clearly something is wrong with those bastards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many people take Xanax while flying.
I'm tempted myself, not because I worry about the plane crashing, but because sitting on the tarmac for two hours with no air conditioning, crammed in next to some fat bastard with his shrieking kids, well, it doesn't suit me.I don't see why the imaginary terrorists couldn't take Xanax or equivalent.
So really, what the "security" people should do is molest the people who aren't afraid, stressed, or angry.
Clearly something is wrong with those bastards.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005120</id>
	<title>Re:Detects terrorists...</title>
	<author>jellomizer</author>
	<datestamp>1257519300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or from a machine that will go off causing you a bunch of problems and missing your important flight.  If are afraid of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or from a machine that will go off causing you a bunch of problems and missing your important flight .
If are afraid of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or from a machine that will go off causing you a bunch of problems and missing your important flight.
If are afraid of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006856</id>
	<title>They will try anything</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257530820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good grief! People will try anything to avoid profiling, the only thing that actually has a chance of working. Just get the fuck over it already!<br><br>Political correctness will be the end of us.<br>Just ask the dead at Ft. Hood.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good grief !
People will try anything to avoid profiling , the only thing that actually has a chance of working .
Just get the fuck over it already ! Political correctness will be the end of us.Just ask the dead at Ft. Hood .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good grief!
People will try anything to avoid profiling, the only thing that actually has a chance of working.
Just get the fuck over it already!Political correctness will be the end of us.Just ask the dead at Ft. Hood.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005148</id>
	<title>any real data ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257519480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article had a dead link to a conf presentation.<br>pubmed search of author Lilianne Mujica-Parodi  got nothing<br>her web site does have a data free page http://lsec.bme.stonybrook.edu/Site/Alarm\_Pheromones.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article had a dead link to a conf presentation.pubmed search of author Lilianne Mujica-Parodi got nothingher web site does have a data free page http : //lsec.bme.stonybrook.edu/Site/Alarm \ _Pheromones.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article had a dead link to a conf presentation.pubmed search of author Lilianne Mujica-Parodi  got nothingher web site does have a data free page http://lsec.bme.stonybrook.edu/Site/Alarm\_Pheromones.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006478</id>
	<title>Again a study of only (!) 20 (!) samples!</title>
	<author>fluch</author>
	<datestamp>1257528420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Again a study with <b>only 20</b> samples!!! A study based on such a tiny amount of data does not have any scientific relevance! When do ever people learn that you need a much larger amount of data to produce a statement of any significant meaning!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Again a study with only 20 samples ! ! !
A study based on such a tiny amount of data does not have any scientific relevance !
When do ever people learn that you need a much larger amount of data to produce a statement of any significant meaning !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Again a study with only 20 samples!!!
A study based on such a tiny amount of data does not have any scientific relevance!
When do ever people learn that you need a much larger amount of data to produce a statement of any significant meaning!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007764</id>
	<title>12 monkeys</title>
	<author>zmooc</author>
	<datestamp>1257536280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remember the bioterrorist from 12 Monkeys? That's about how afraid terrorists are: happy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember the bioterrorist from 12 Monkeys ?
That 's about how afraid terrorists are : happy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember the bioterrorist from 12 Monkeys?
That's about how afraid terrorists are: happy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005124</id>
	<title>OK...</title>
	<author>joh</author>
	<datestamp>1257519300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While I think the "smell out terrorists" idea is absurd and deserves no further discussion, smell-profiling itself may prove to be a valid idea. And as often all the *other* uses of such technology may have a real impact. Drug use, gender, emotional state, age etc. being detected by some smell detectors opens new fields in surveillance and control. And I'm not sure I like that at all.</p><p>And if you look at how dogs can follow and search people by their individual smell I see no real reason why "smell fingerprinting" shouldn't work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While I think the " smell out terrorists " idea is absurd and deserves no further discussion , smell-profiling itself may prove to be a valid idea .
And as often all the * other * uses of such technology may have a real impact .
Drug use , gender , emotional state , age etc .
being detected by some smell detectors opens new fields in surveillance and control .
And I 'm not sure I like that at all.And if you look at how dogs can follow and search people by their individual smell I see no real reason why " smell fingerprinting " should n't work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I think the "smell out terrorists" idea is absurd and deserves no further discussion, smell-profiling itself may prove to be a valid idea.
And as often all the *other* uses of such technology may have a real impact.
Drug use, gender, emotional state, age etc.
being detected by some smell detectors opens new fields in surveillance and control.
And I'm not sure I like that at all.And if you look at how dogs can follow and search people by their individual smell I see no real reason why "smell fingerprinting" shouldn't work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005022</id>
	<title>I must not fear...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257518580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... fear is the mind killer, fear is the little death that brings airport security...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... fear is the mind killer , fear is the little death that brings airport security.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... fear is the mind killer, fear is the little death that brings airport security...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005372</id>
	<title>Re:Great</title>
	<author>stormhair</author>
	<datestamp>1257521100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I have been suffering on anxiety disorder now for the last 15 years, does that mean I will get an anal search every time I cross the border now?</p></div></blockquote><p>

I'm afraid so.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been suffering on anxiety disorder now for the last 15 years , does that mean I will get an anal search every time I cross the border now ?
I 'm afraid so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been suffering on anxiety disorder now for the last 15 years, does that mean I will get an anal search every time I cross the border now?
I'm afraid so.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005404</id>
	<title>About the study</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257521400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This study stinks.</p><p>Someone had to do it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This study stinks.Someone had to do it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This study stinks.Someone had to do it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006408</id>
	<title>Re:Detects terrorists...</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1257527940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd have thought a bit of "Dutch courage" would have a similar effect.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd have thought a bit of " Dutch courage " would have a similar effect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd have thought a bit of "Dutch courage" would have a similar effect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007666</id>
	<title>Just one problem.</title>
	<author>mweather</author>
	<datestamp>1257535740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Terrorists are not afraid. Nobody fears getting laid by 72 virgins.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Terrorists are not afraid .
Nobody fears getting laid by 72 virgins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Terrorists are not afraid.
Nobody fears getting laid by 72 virgins.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007254</id>
	<title>Inderal</title>
	<author>solszew</author>
	<datestamp>1257533100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Inderol makes this a non-starter.</p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inderal</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Inderol makes this a non-starter.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inderal</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Inderol makes this a non-starter.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inderal</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30008082</id>
	<title>Re:Where is the standard response?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257538080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The DHS loves the smell of scared sheeple in the morning.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The DHS loves the smell of scared sheeple in the morning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The DHS loves the smell of scared sheeple in the morning.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005800</id>
	<title>no fear</title>
	<author>skoony</author>
	<datestamp>1257523980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>unfortunitly zealot terrorists have no fear.
they are at one with there world,going to meet there maker and enjoy there reward.
calm as cucumbers.
alas another busted idea regards,
mike</htmltext>
<tokenext>unfortunitly zealot terrorists have no fear .
they are at one with there world,going to meet there maker and enjoy there reward .
calm as cucumbers .
alas another busted idea regards , mike</tokentext>
<sentencetext>unfortunitly zealot terrorists have no fear.
they are at one with there world,going to meet there maker and enjoy there reward.
calm as cucumbers.
alas another busted idea regards,
mike</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005188</id>
	<title>as reported by the WHAT?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257519720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Now, a bird dropping a piece of bread on a section of the accelerator has, <b>according to the Register</b>, shut down the whole operation.</i></p><p>Isn't the Register only about 3/4 of one notch above the Onion?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , a bird dropping a piece of bread on a section of the accelerator has , according to the Register , shut down the whole operation.Is n't the Register only about 3/4 of one notch above the Onion ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, a bird dropping a piece of bread on a section of the accelerator has, according to the Register, shut down the whole operation.Isn't the Register only about 3/4 of one notch above the Onion?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007090</id>
	<title>Re:Last time I checked...</title>
	<author>CanHasDIY</author>
	<datestamp>1257532140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Being afraid isn't a crime, nor is it probable cause for a search.</p><p>-jcr</p></div><p>Yet.

Remember not so long ago, making a mix tape for a party wasn't a crime either...

Now that same action can get you fined into bankruptcy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Being afraid is n't a crime , nor is it probable cause for a search.-jcrYet .
Remember not so long ago , making a mix tape for a party was n't a crime either.. . Now that same action can get you fined into bankruptcy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being afraid isn't a crime, nor is it probable cause for a search.-jcrYet.
Remember not so long ago, making a mix tape for a party wasn't a crime either...

Now that same action can get you fined into bankruptcy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005598</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005342</id>
	<title>Re:Great</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257520860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I have been suffering on anxiety disorder now for the last 15 years, does that mean I will get an anal search every time I cross the border now?</p></div><p>Dunno.  You afraid of anal searches?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been suffering on anxiety disorder now for the last 15 years , does that mean I will get an anal search every time I cross the border now ? Dunno .
You afraid of anal searches ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been suffering on anxiety disorder now for the last 15 years, does that mean I will get an anal search every time I cross the border now?Dunno.
You afraid of anal searches?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004904</id>
	<title>Terrorists will just learn to be fearless</title>
	<author>TheRealRainFall</author>
	<datestamp>1257517620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As soon as this becomes the norm people will just have to run through fearless tests/scenarios just as an astronaut has to not puke in a zero gravity environment.  It's just another hurdle and we'll likely ignore telltale signs in favor of machines but this is definitely an interesting advancement. It should stop the rogue unprepared school shooting type person.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As soon as this becomes the norm people will just have to run through fearless tests/scenarios just as an astronaut has to not puke in a zero gravity environment .
It 's just another hurdle and we 'll likely ignore telltale signs in favor of machines but this is definitely an interesting advancement .
It should stop the rogue unprepared school shooting type person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As soon as this becomes the norm people will just have to run through fearless tests/scenarios just as an astronaut has to not puke in a zero gravity environment.
It's just another hurdle and we'll likely ignore telltale signs in favor of machines but this is definitely an interesting advancement.
It should stop the rogue unprepared school shooting type person.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005278</id>
	<title>They needed scientists to figure this out?</title>
	<author>NetNinja</author>
	<datestamp>1257520320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Animals smell it and react to it accordingly.</p><p>Ever been to Marine Corps boot camp? Couldn't get the smell out of the squad bay for a month.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Animals smell it and react to it accordingly.Ever been to Marine Corps boot camp ?
Could n't get the smell out of the squad bay for a month .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Animals smell it and react to it accordingly.Ever been to Marine Corps boot camp?
Couldn't get the smell out of the squad bay for a month.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005240</id>
	<title>Detects everybody...</title>
	<author>captainpanic</author>
	<datestamp>1257520080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A number of false positives reported in the media, and everybody will fear that machine...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A number of false positives reported in the media , and everybody will fear that machine.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A number of false positives reported in the media, and everybody will fear that machine...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004894</id>
	<title>More profiling...</title>
	<author>cbope</author>
	<datestamp>1257517620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great, just what we need, more profiling in place of real security. And just how is this supposed to work with psychopaths who do not experience the emotion of fear?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , just what we need , more profiling in place of real security .
And just how is this supposed to work with psychopaths who do not experience the emotion of fear ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, just what we need, more profiling in place of real security.
And just how is this supposed to work with psychopaths who do not experience the emotion of fear?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005464</id>
	<title>Ka-ching</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257521760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Smoke weed before flying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Smoke weed before flying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Smoke weed before flying.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006368</id>
	<title>Because we need cold blooded, calm terrorists...</title>
	<author>rpauli</author>
	<datestamp>1257527760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... and all those inept nervous terrorists who smell bad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... and all those inept nervous terrorists who smell bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and all those inept nervous terrorists who smell bad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007684</id>
	<title>Sounds like they've been watching Super Troopers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257535860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Next the TSA agents will be meowing at us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Next the TSA agents will be meowing at us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next the TSA agents will be meowing at us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005208</id>
	<title>Probably will NOT work on terrorists</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257519840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>These are ppl that have already made up their mind of HOW things will happen. If they know that they are going to die, they have already discarded the fear. As such, it is possible that these ppl will get by. OTH, if they are hoping to get out of it alive, then yeah, fear will be a big factor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>These are ppl that have already made up their mind of HOW things will happen .
If they know that they are going to die , they have already discarded the fear .
As such , it is possible that these ppl will get by .
OTH , if they are hoping to get out of it alive , then yeah , fear will be a big factor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These are ppl that have already made up their mind of HOW things will happen.
If they know that they are going to die, they have already discarded the fear.
As such, it is possible that these ppl will get by.
OTH, if they are hoping to get out of it alive, then yeah, fear will be a big factor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30010372</id>
	<title>To fear, or not to fear.</title>
	<author>kuei12</author>
	<datestamp>1257505080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is america. Everybody in america is afraid...except suicide bombers. Maybe the detector  will only sound an alarm if no fear is detected.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is america .
Everybody in america is afraid...except suicide bombers .
Maybe the detector will only sound an alarm if no fear is detected .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is america.
Everybody in america is afraid...except suicide bombers.
Maybe the detector  will only sound an alarm if no fear is detected.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005244</id>
	<title>Keeping everyone afraid.</title>
	<author>fuyu-no-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1257520140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Combine this with the government's need to keep everyone afraid. Now they can arrest almost anyone as a terrorist. And those few people that don't buy into the government hype and don't smell of fear? They obviously don't listen to Big Brother, so they must be terrorists too!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Combine this with the government 's need to keep everyone afraid .
Now they can arrest almost anyone as a terrorist .
And those few people that do n't buy into the government hype and do n't smell of fear ?
They obviously do n't listen to Big Brother , so they must be terrorists too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Combine this with the government's need to keep everyone afraid.
Now they can arrest almost anyone as a terrorist.
And those few people that don't buy into the government hype and don't smell of fear?
They obviously don't listen to Big Brother, so they must be terrorists too!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006030</id>
	<title>Following hollywood....</title>
	<author>Fragadelic</author>
	<datestamp>1257525660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And here we have the start of.....Minority Report-like law enforcement!</htmltext>
<tokenext>And here we have the start of.....Minority Report-like law enforcement !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And here we have the start of.....Minority Report-like law enforcement!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005944</id>
	<title>My god, the sheer ignorance...</title>
	<author>e-scetic</author>
	<datestamp>1257524940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
I used to hang out with a bunch of seriously hardcore criminals and "bad types".  I strongly suspect, from firsthand experience, that anyone who believes in "fear associated with criminal activity" hasn't known very many criminals and doesn't really understand the "criminal mind", especially the sort of criminal who is deranged.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to hang out with a bunch of seriously hardcore criminals and " bad types " .
I strongly suspect , from firsthand experience , that anyone who believes in " fear associated with criminal activity " has n't known very many criminals and does n't really understand the " criminal mind " , especially the sort of criminal who is deranged .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I used to hang out with a bunch of seriously hardcore criminals and "bad types".
I strongly suspect, from firsthand experience, that anyone who believes in "fear associated with criminal activity" hasn't known very many criminals and doesn't really understand the "criminal mind", especially the sort of criminal who is deranged.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004864</id>
	<title>The only thing we have to fear...</title>
	<author>kevinNCSU</author>
	<datestamp>1257517380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>They decided people weren't taking FDR's warning seriously enough so they'd give us a damn good reason to fear fear itself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They decided people were n't taking FDR 's warning seriously enough so they 'd give us a damn good reason to fear fear itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They decided people weren't taking FDR's warning seriously enough so they'd give us a damn good reason to fear fear itself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006902</id>
	<title>as Dr. Hibbert said</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257531060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It has to be terror sweat!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It has to be terror sweat !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has to be terror sweat!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006998</id>
	<title>Re:Detects terrorists...</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1257531660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Much simpler -- just don't bathe for a month. Accumulate enough natural odors that the machine becomes either confused or overwhelmed. As a side benefit, you'll get brownie points for your geek badge.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Much simpler -- just do n't bathe for a month .
Accumulate enough natural odors that the machine becomes either confused or overwhelmed .
As a side benefit , you 'll get brownie points for your geek badge .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Much simpler -- just don't bathe for a month.
Accumulate enough natural odors that the machine becomes either confused or overwhelmed.
As a side benefit, you'll get brownie points for your geek badge.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004922</id>
	<title>weak</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257517680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>smell-crime. way overdue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>smell-crime .
way overdue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>smell-crime.
way overdue.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005996</id>
	<title>What about Dead Terrorists?</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1257525360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like those who no longer can secrete Fear Pheromones, Like: Achmed the Dead terrorist.</p><p>That guy can walk right on by past this because even though he is a Terrorizing terrorist and his dead skeletal body can no longer produce fear pheromones because his flesh has all been blown off his body.</p><p>They will only now be stopping creepy people with lotion on puppets instead....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like those who no longer can secrete Fear Pheromones , Like : Achmed the Dead terrorist.That guy can walk right on by past this because even though he is a Terrorizing terrorist and his dead skeletal body can no longer produce fear pheromones because his flesh has all been blown off his body.They will only now be stopping creepy people with lotion on puppets instead... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like those who no longer can secrete Fear Pheromones, Like: Achmed the Dead terrorist.That guy can walk right on by past this because even though he is a Terrorizing terrorist and his dead skeletal body can no longer produce fear pheromones because his flesh has all been blown off his body.They will only now be stopping creepy people with lotion on puppets instead....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005150</id>
	<title>IANAP but aren't there ways around this?</title>
	<author>thesandbender</author>
	<datestamp>1257519480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm curious if certain psychiatric drugs would mitigate this effect.  My friend takes valium before he flies, I would imagine that a benzo or even paxil would have a similar "masking" effect.
<br> <br>
I've also heard that paxil can turn a small segment of the population into cannibals if pumped into the atmosphere.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm curious if certain psychiatric drugs would mitigate this effect .
My friend takes valium before he flies , I would imagine that a benzo or even paxil would have a similar " masking " effect .
I 've also heard that paxil can turn a small segment of the population into cannibals if pumped into the atmosphere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm curious if certain psychiatric drugs would mitigate this effect.
My friend takes valium before he flies, I would imagine that a benzo or even paxil would have a similar "masking" effect.
I've also heard that paxil can turn a small segment of the population into cannibals if pumped into the atmosphere.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30008484</id>
	<title>All you really need to do</title>
	<author>Allnighterking</author>
	<datestamp>1257539940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is ask if they are Republican..... That's a prime indicator of terrorist leanings.  Seconded by being a democrat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is ask if they are Republican..... That 's a prime indicator of terrorist leanings .
Seconded by being a democrat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is ask if they are Republican..... That's a prime indicator of terrorist leanings.
Seconded by being a democrat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005286</id>
	<title>The reason for arrest: "You was looking afraid!"</title>
	<author>HollyMolly-1122</author>
	<datestamp>1257520380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's stupid.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's stupid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004980</id>
	<title>Doubleplusgood?</title>
	<author>Shienarier</author>
	<datestamp>1257518280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't this a step towards thought crime?<br>"He's scared, arrest him!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this a step towards thought crime ?
" He 's scared , arrest him !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this a step towards thought crime?
"He's scared, arrest him!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007476</id>
	<title>Re:Love these comments...</title>
	<author>jim\_v2000</author>
	<datestamp>1257534600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are these things going to detect levels of fear?  Is it even possible?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are these things going to detect levels of fear ?
Is it even possible ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are these things going to detect levels of fear?
Is it even possible?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005118</id>
	<title>Even if it doesn't work ...</title>
	<author>goldmaneye</author>
	<datestamp>1257519300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... we could probably sell it to <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/11/04/2340204/Iraq-Swears-By-Dowsing-Rod-Bomb-Detector" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">the Iraqi army.</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>... we could probably sell it to the Iraqi army .
[ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... we could probably sell it to the Iraqi army.
[slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005262</id>
	<title>I'm My Own Worst Enemy Sometimes</title>
	<author>Chente</author>
	<datestamp>1257520260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wouldn't do well with this at all.  If I knew that a fear detector was being used, I would start to be afraid that I might be afraid of it and that fear would grow into a panic that I might be sufficiently afraid to set the thing off, which would be scary because then I'd start imagining  my interrogation at the hands of jackbooted DHS thugs with their enormous attack rottweilers and their hideous cattle prods.  The image of rottweilers using cattle prods on me would be too much for me to bear and I'd just set off the fear detector, which would be a relief because then the suspense would finally be over and then the interrogation could begin in earnest.</p><p>Very truely yours,</p><p>Franz Kafka</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't do well with this at all .
If I knew that a fear detector was being used , I would start to be afraid that I might be afraid of it and that fear would grow into a panic that I might be sufficiently afraid to set the thing off , which would be scary because then I 'd start imagining my interrogation at the hands of jackbooted DHS thugs with their enormous attack rottweilers and their hideous cattle prods .
The image of rottweilers using cattle prods on me would be too much for me to bear and I 'd just set off the fear detector , which would be a relief because then the suspense would finally be over and then the interrogation could begin in earnest.Very truely yours,Franz Kafka</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't do well with this at all.
If I knew that a fear detector was being used, I would start to be afraid that I might be afraid of it and that fear would grow into a panic that I might be sufficiently afraid to set the thing off, which would be scary because then I'd start imagining  my interrogation at the hands of jackbooted DHS thugs with their enormous attack rottweilers and their hideous cattle prods.
The image of rottweilers using cattle prods on me would be too much for me to bear and I'd just set off the fear detector, which would be a relief because then the suspense would finally be over and then the interrogation could begin in earnest.Very truely yours,Franz Kafka</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004958</id>
	<title>Bogey</title>
	<author>Mr\_Blank</author>
	<datestamp>1257518040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. quote right now...</p><p>Everybody has something to conceal. -- Humphrey Bogart</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The / .
quote right now...Everybody has something to conceal .
-- Humphrey Bogart</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The /.
quote right now...Everybody has something to conceal.
-- Humphrey Bogart
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005312</id>
	<title>Good Money Down the Crapper</title>
	<author>flyneye</author>
	<datestamp>1257520620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dearly hope my poor tax dollars don't pay for any of this garbage.<br>Anyone with a little training can control their brains alpha state and stay cool as a cucumber.<br>Then there are those sweaty people who naturally start sweating when standing belly to ass in line waiting waiting waiting.<br>Then there are those who are overdressed in airports for the cold climes to which they will arrive.<br>Then there are the sick.<br>The nervous and fearful of flying.<br>Those phobic of authority.<br>F$\%kin morons might as well flip a coin to pick people out of a line.<br>If this is money spent by the taxpayer, those responsible should be stripped of their own personal wealth and have their possessions liquidated and be enslaved until such money reappears in the coffers.<br>Who thinks of this crap?</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dearly hope my poor tax dollars do n't pay for any of this garbage.Anyone with a little training can control their brains alpha state and stay cool as a cucumber.Then there are those sweaty people who naturally start sweating when standing belly to ass in line waiting waiting waiting.Then there are those who are overdressed in airports for the cold climes to which they will arrive.Then there are the sick.The nervous and fearful of flying.Those phobic of authority.F $ \ % kin morons might as well flip a coin to pick people out of a line.If this is money spent by the taxpayer , those responsible should be stripped of their own personal wealth and have their possessions liquidated and be enslaved until such money reappears in the coffers.Who thinks of this crap ?
         </tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dearly hope my poor tax dollars don't pay for any of this garbage.Anyone with a little training can control their brains alpha state and stay cool as a cucumber.Then there are those sweaty people who naturally start sweating when standing belly to ass in line waiting waiting waiting.Then there are those who are overdressed in airports for the cold climes to which they will arrive.Then there are the sick.The nervous and fearful of flying.Those phobic of authority.F$\%kin morons might as well flip a coin to pick people out of a line.If this is money spent by the taxpayer, those responsible should be stripped of their own personal wealth and have their possessions liquidated and be enslaved until such money reappears in the coffers.Who thinks of this crap?
         </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005276</id>
	<title>Re:Detects terrorists...</title>
	<author>realityimpaired</author>
	<datestamp>1257520320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Y'know.... a man can change the scent/pheromones his body gives off as easily as taking a drug like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androcur" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">cyproterone</a> [wikipedia.org]. The effects are temporary, but taking it in doses of about 50mg/day for a week before flying will have a big enough impact on the way your body produces pheromones that most people won't be able to read you properly. Stop taking the drug, and your body resumes normal operation...</p><p>Not suggesting, of course, that the terrorists would think to use a drug that, in people with a Y-chromosome, is usually used to treat transgenderism (and occasionally used to treat prostate cancer), but there are a very large number of drugs out there on the market, some available over the counter, that will affect your body's hormone balance, and will in turn affect the pheromones that your body produces. With so many ways to screw with the results available, I'd be very surprised if they could get such a system to work properly with an acceptable false positive/false negative rate....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Y'know.... a man can change the scent/pheromones his body gives off as easily as taking a drug like cyproterone [ wikipedia.org ] .
The effects are temporary , but taking it in doses of about 50mg/day for a week before flying will have a big enough impact on the way your body produces pheromones that most people wo n't be able to read you properly .
Stop taking the drug , and your body resumes normal operation...Not suggesting , of course , that the terrorists would think to use a drug that , in people with a Y-chromosome , is usually used to treat transgenderism ( and occasionally used to treat prostate cancer ) , but there are a very large number of drugs out there on the market , some available over the counter , that will affect your body 's hormone balance , and will in turn affect the pheromones that your body produces .
With so many ways to screw with the results available , I 'd be very surprised if they could get such a system to work properly with an acceptable false positive/false negative rate... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Y'know.... a man can change the scent/pheromones his body gives off as easily as taking a drug like cyproterone [wikipedia.org].
The effects are temporary, but taking it in doses of about 50mg/day for a week before flying will have a big enough impact on the way your body produces pheromones that most people won't be able to read you properly.
Stop taking the drug, and your body resumes normal operation...Not suggesting, of course, that the terrorists would think to use a drug that, in people with a Y-chromosome, is usually used to treat transgenderism (and occasionally used to treat prostate cancer), but there are a very large number of drugs out there on the market, some available over the counter, that will affect your body's hormone balance, and will in turn affect the pheromones that your body produces.
With so many ways to screw with the results available, I'd be very surprised if they could get such a system to work properly with an acceptable false positive/false negative rate....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004892</id>
	<title>Profit!!!</title>
	<author>redhog</author>
	<datestamp>1257517620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>1. Get a degree in chemistry<br>2. Create artificial "fear hormone"<br>3. Bottle hormone in spray-flask<br>4. Spray "on your car" outside airport (and wash car with a piece of cloth) - make sure to spray passers-by<br>5. ???<br>6. Profit!!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Get a degree in chemistry2 .
Create artificial " fear hormone " 3 .
Bottle hormone in spray-flask4 .
Spray " on your car " outside airport ( and wash car with a piece of cloth ) - make sure to spray passers-by5 .
? ? ? 6. Profit ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Get a degree in chemistry2.
Create artificial "fear hormone"3.
Bottle hormone in spray-flask4.
Spray "on your car" outside airport (and wash car with a piece of cloth) - make sure to spray passers-by5.
???6. Profit!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005448</id>
	<title>funky people must sit at home in the pose No6</title>
	<author>HollyMolly-1122</author>
	<datestamp>1257521580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>... Pay more taxes and wait for new doggy style prodigy comming from behind.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... Pay more taxes and wait for new doggy style prodigy comming from behind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... Pay more taxes and wait for new doggy style prodigy comming from behind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005476</id>
	<title>Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257521820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How can you get the smell right if the people jumping out of a plane aren't doing it illegally?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How can you get the smell right if the people jumping out of a plane are n't doing it illegally ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can you get the smell right if the people jumping out of a plane aren't doing it illegally?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005798</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>Bardez</author>
	<datestamp>1257523920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"There is nothing to fear, but fear itself."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" There is nothing to fear , but fear itself .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"There is nothing to fear, but fear itself.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005064</id>
	<title>I love it!</title>
	<author>pehrs</author>
	<datestamp>1257518880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really like the idea! Preferably it should be combined with US patent 6970105 (Passenger control system during a plane flying) <a href="http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6970105.html" title="freepatentsonline.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6970105.html</a> [freepatentsonline.com]</p><p>So we fit all passengers with large collars containing big needles with sedatives. At the first smell of fear we inject a propper dose of sedatives in their necks. The problems with terrorism and fear of flying solved at the same time.</p><p>I really must run and patent this idea right now... And get the movie rights!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really like the idea !
Preferably it should be combined with US patent 6970105 ( Passenger control system during a plane flying ) http : //www.freepatentsonline.com/6970105.html [ freepatentsonline.com ] So we fit all passengers with large collars containing big needles with sedatives .
At the first smell of fear we inject a propper dose of sedatives in their necks .
The problems with terrorism and fear of flying solved at the same time.I really must run and patent this idea right now... And get the movie rights !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really like the idea!
Preferably it should be combined with US patent 6970105 (Passenger control system during a plane flying) http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6970105.html [freepatentsonline.com]So we fit all passengers with large collars containing big needles with sedatives.
At the first smell of fear we inject a propper dose of sedatives in their necks.
The problems with terrorism and fear of flying solved at the same time.I really must run and patent this idea right now... And get the movie rights!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007186</id>
	<title>Oh, great...</title>
	<author>roc97007</author>
	<datestamp>1257532680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
My wife is terrified of flying.  Now I have to allocate another hour for the anal exam.  Maybe we'll just drive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My wife is terrified of flying .
Now I have to allocate another hour for the anal exam .
Maybe we 'll just drive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
My wife is terrified of flying.
Now I have to allocate another hour for the anal exam.
Maybe we'll just drive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004862</id>
	<title>Underarms?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257517380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"And in the news today, hundreds of teenage boys were arrested under the Prevention of Terrorism Act. They were later released after it turned out they were simply wearing Axe deodorant"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" And in the news today , hundreds of teenage boys were arrested under the Prevention of Terrorism Act .
They were later released after it turned out they were simply wearing Axe deodorant "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"And in the news today, hundreds of teenage boys were arrested under the Prevention of Terrorism Act.
They were later released after it turned out they were simply wearing Axe deodorant"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006146</id>
	<title>Re:Love these comments...</title>
	<author>vistapwns</author>
	<datestamp>1257526440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm going to respond here, instead of to each reply-ie individually...</p><p>I think the scientists involved already know whether or not a terrorist is more scared than the average person,<br>I don't have scientific links to back it up, but I'm pretty sure even the most fervant believer is scared shitless when carrying out attacks (there is still the risk of being identified and shot in the stomach for instance.)</p><p>As far as medications, well I think you'd have to take enough meds to kill a horse in order not to be scared that there is a bomb under your nut sack, or that you will be discovered and plugged with 9mm slugs.  Hey, worse case, they make it, study it's effective and it doesn't work and they toss it in the trash, I think it should at least be tried. As far as kids with bags of dope, well I think we should work harder on legalization/sensible laws instead of trying to hold technology back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going to respond here , instead of to each reply-ie individually...I think the scientists involved already know whether or not a terrorist is more scared than the average person,I do n't have scientific links to back it up , but I 'm pretty sure even the most fervant believer is scared shitless when carrying out attacks ( there is still the risk of being identified and shot in the stomach for instance .
) As far as medications , well I think you 'd have to take enough meds to kill a horse in order not to be scared that there is a bomb under your nut sack , or that you will be discovered and plugged with 9mm slugs .
Hey , worse case , they make it , study it 's effective and it does n't work and they toss it in the trash , I think it should at least be tried .
As far as kids with bags of dope , well I think we should work harder on legalization/sensible laws instead of trying to hold technology back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going to respond here, instead of to each reply-ie individually...I think the scientists involved already know whether or not a terrorist is more scared than the average person,I don't have scientific links to back it up, but I'm pretty sure even the most fervant believer is scared shitless when carrying out attacks (there is still the risk of being identified and shot in the stomach for instance.
)As far as medications, well I think you'd have to take enough meds to kill a horse in order not to be scared that there is a bomb under your nut sack, or that you will be discovered and plugged with 9mm slugs.
Hey, worse case, they make it, study it's effective and it doesn't work and they toss it in the trash, I think it should at least be tried.
As far as kids with bags of dope, well I think we should work harder on legalization/sensible laws instead of trying to hold technology back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005232</id>
	<title>This will work really well...</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1257520080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...for identifying people who are frightened of being identified as being frightened.</p><p>&gt;<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...especially the fear in relation to criminal acts...</p><p>Bullshit.  Someone whos is afraid that customs will catch him smuggling lizards will smell no different from someone who is afraid of flying (the lizards might, though).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...for identifying people who are frightened of being identified as being frightened. &gt; ...especially the fear in relation to criminal acts...Bullshit .
Someone whos is afraid that customs will catch him smuggling lizards will smell no different from someone who is afraid of flying ( the lizards might , though ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...for identifying people who are frightened of being identified as being frightened.&gt; ...especially the fear in relation to criminal acts...Bullshit.
Someone whos is afraid that customs will catch him smuggling lizards will smell no different from someone who is afraid of flying (the lizards might, though).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005742</id>
	<title>Where do will go taxpayer's dollars today?</title>
	<author>HollyMolly-1122</author>
	<datestamp>1257523500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And the winner is... the winner is: fear sniffer! Congratulations for this great investment!</htmltext>
<tokenext>And the winner is... the winner is : fear sniffer !
Congratulations for this great investment !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the winner is... the winner is: fear sniffer!
Congratulations for this great investment!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007298</id>
	<title>Re:Great</title>
	<author>mdielmann</author>
	<datestamp>1257533340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, just because it <b>looks</b> like a Snickers bar...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , just because it looks like a Snickers bar.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, just because it looks like a Snickers bar...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006058</id>
	<title>Re:Great</title>
	<author>notarockstar1979</author>
	<datestamp>1257525960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hide something fun up in there so they have a nice surprise every time they search you.  Maybe a $10 or a Snickers bar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hide something fun up in there so they have a nice surprise every time they search you .
Maybe a $ 10 or a Snickers bar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hide something fun up in there so they have a nice surprise every time they search you.
Maybe a $10 or a Snickers bar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007616</id>
	<title>Re:Love these comments...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257535440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>A terrorist is going to be a LOT more afraid of getting on that plane and detonating a bomb on it, and possibly getting caught by security, than an average person is going to be afraid of flying</i> </p><p>What's your rationale for this line of logic? A much more reasonable assumption is that people who are prepared to kill themselves in the name of religion will not exhibit the same emotional reaction as common criminals. Do you know how many people have to get doped up on valium before they can even think about setting foot on a plane? Did any of the 9/11 hijackers have this problem? These people honestly believe that there is a good chance they will die.  The terrorists KNOW they are going to die and they do it anyway. This doesn't imply more fear; it implies much LESS fear. I have met people with terminal diseases.  Given that they've known about it for many months, they are much less afraid of death than most people without terminal disease.<br>(It's also worth noting this idea was not tested on terrorists.  It was tested on skydivers, i.e. people who have a heightened fear of heights.)  </p><p>You mention the possibility of getting caught by security.  I think this is irrelevant.  Either way they are martyrs in their jihad.  I don't think the possibility of spending time in US prisons actually terrifies them all that much. Many probably would plan on fighting to the death. I'm not arguing that there would be no anxiety; I'm arguing that it would be lower than moderate-fear-of-flying anxiety. Religious fervor is ego-destroying and reality distorting.  It allows missionaries to live in huts surrounded by wilderness and cannibal and martyrs to stride confidently into gas chambers (or lion pits.)  Religion's entire purpose (and Abrahamic religion specifically) is to suppress fear.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A terrorist is going to be a LOT more afraid of getting on that plane and detonating a bomb on it , and possibly getting caught by security , than an average person is going to be afraid of flying What 's your rationale for this line of logic ?
A much more reasonable assumption is that people who are prepared to kill themselves in the name of religion will not exhibit the same emotional reaction as common criminals .
Do you know how many people have to get doped up on valium before they can even think about setting foot on a plane ?
Did any of the 9/11 hijackers have this problem ?
These people honestly believe that there is a good chance they will die .
The terrorists KNOW they are going to die and they do it anyway .
This does n't imply more fear ; it implies much LESS fear .
I have met people with terminal diseases .
Given that they 've known about it for many months , they are much less afraid of death than most people without terminal disease .
( It 's also worth noting this idea was not tested on terrorists .
It was tested on skydivers , i.e .
people who have a heightened fear of heights .
) You mention the possibility of getting caught by security .
I think this is irrelevant .
Either way they are martyrs in their jihad .
I do n't think the possibility of spending time in US prisons actually terrifies them all that much .
Many probably would plan on fighting to the death .
I 'm not arguing that there would be no anxiety ; I 'm arguing that it would be lower than moderate-fear-of-flying anxiety .
Religious fervor is ego-destroying and reality distorting .
It allows missionaries to live in huts surrounded by wilderness and cannibal and martyrs to stride confidently into gas chambers ( or lion pits .
) Religion 's entire purpose ( and Abrahamic religion specifically ) is to suppress fear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A terrorist is going to be a LOT more afraid of getting on that plane and detonating a bomb on it, and possibly getting caught by security, than an average person is going to be afraid of flying What's your rationale for this line of logic?
A much more reasonable assumption is that people who are prepared to kill themselves in the name of religion will not exhibit the same emotional reaction as common criminals.
Do you know how many people have to get doped up on valium before they can even think about setting foot on a plane?
Did any of the 9/11 hijackers have this problem?
These people honestly believe that there is a good chance they will die.
The terrorists KNOW they are going to die and they do it anyway.
This doesn't imply more fear; it implies much LESS fear.
I have met people with terminal diseases.
Given that they've known about it for many months, they are much less afraid of death than most people without terminal disease.
(It's also worth noting this idea was not tested on terrorists.
It was tested on skydivers, i.e.
people who have a heightened fear of heights.
)  You mention the possibility of getting caught by security.
I think this is irrelevant.
Either way they are martyrs in their jihad.
I don't think the possibility of spending time in US prisons actually terrifies them all that much.
Many probably would plan on fighting to the death.
I'm not arguing that there would be no anxiety; I'm arguing that it would be lower than moderate-fear-of-flying anxiety.
Religious fervor is ego-destroying and reality distorting.
It allows missionaries to live in huts surrounded by wilderness and cannibal and martyrs to stride confidently into gas chambers (or lion pits.
)  Religion's entire purpose (and Abrahamic religion specifically) is to suppress fear.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005194</id>
	<title>Chanel No. 5: "no-fier factor"</title>
	<author>HollyMolly-1122</author>
	<datestamp>1257519780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or just: Airport bravity sense..
People use pheromones already. They can use whatever smell or whatever sense they want! Is that prohibited ?
Imagine that a few years later you could find in a shop special "airport bravity sense" ? For "comfortable living with stupid fear sniffers"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)

Who could eliminate the "fier factor" for people who are 1st time in a plane ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or just : Airport bravity sense. . People use pheromones already .
They can use whatever smell or whatever sense they want !
Is that prohibited ?
Imagine that a few years later you could find in a shop special " airport bravity sense " ?
For " comfortable living with stupid fear sniffers " : - ) Who could eliminate the " fier factor " for people who are 1st time in a plane ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or just: Airport bravity sense..
People use pheromones already.
They can use whatever smell or whatever sense they want!
Is that prohibited ?
Imagine that a few years later you could find in a shop special "airport bravity sense" ?
For "comfortable living with stupid fear sniffers" :-)

Who could eliminate the "fier factor" for people who are 1st time in a plane ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005284</id>
	<title>Know what's a bigger problem than terrorism?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257520380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Almost everything.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Almost everything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Almost everything.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005970</id>
	<title>Re:Great</title>
	<author>I cant believe its n</author>
	<datestamp>1257525180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Remember that you will be making the world a better place to live in, for all the rent-a-cavity-searchers currently unemployed. Think of their children!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember that you will be making the world a better place to live in , for all the rent-a-cavity-searchers currently unemployed .
Think of their children !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember that you will be making the world a better place to live in, for all the rent-a-cavity-searchers currently unemployed.
Think of their children!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30016852</id>
	<title>Re:Last time I checked...</title>
	<author>jamesccostello</author>
	<datestamp>1257589200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem with that is that in an airport search and siezure is not governed by probable cause.  You can refuse a search, but they don't have to let you onto the plane.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with that is that in an airport search and siezure is not governed by probable cause .
You can refuse a search , but they do n't have to let you onto the plane .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with that is that in an airport search and siezure is not governed by probable cause.
You can refuse a search, but they don't have to let you onto the plane.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005598</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005494</id>
	<title>Re:Love these comments...</title>
	<author>Lehk228</author>
	<datestamp>1257522000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>what is the terrorist afraid of?  he wants to die for his cause, otherwise he wouldn't be using an airline bomb, and failure isn't much of a problem since a bomb going off in a crowded security checkpoint is less spectacular than in the air but it kills plenty of godless infidels(TM).<br> <br>this will be co-opted as another weapon in the war on personal freedom in no time flat, since the 16 year old with a baggie of dope is going to be scared when a cop shows up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>what is the terrorist afraid of ?
he wants to die for his cause , otherwise he would n't be using an airline bomb , and failure is n't much of a problem since a bomb going off in a crowded security checkpoint is less spectacular than in the air but it kills plenty of godless infidels ( TM ) .
this will be co-opted as another weapon in the war on personal freedom in no time flat , since the 16 year old with a baggie of dope is going to be scared when a cop shows up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what is the terrorist afraid of?
he wants to die for his cause, otherwise he wouldn't be using an airline bomb, and failure isn't much of a problem since a bomb going off in a crowded security checkpoint is less spectacular than in the air but it kills plenty of godless infidels(TM).
this will be co-opted as another weapon in the war on personal freedom in no time flat, since the 16 year old with a baggie of dope is going to be scared when a cop shows up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005620</id>
	<title>So you take a psychoactive before  you go</title>
	<author>Atrox666</author>
	<datestamp>1257522780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A beta blocker would do just fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A beta blocker would do just fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A beta blocker would do just fine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006038</id>
	<title>Re:Let's Be Serious</title>
	<author>Inda</author>
	<datestamp>1257525780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was pulled over by the police some weeks ago. The copper said to me "you look nervious". I'd done nothing wrong, my car was in tip-top condition, I was nervious because this copper had the power to change my life on a whim.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was pulled over by the police some weeks ago .
The copper said to me " you look nervious " .
I 'd done nothing wrong , my car was in tip-top condition , I was nervious because this copper had the power to change my life on a whim .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was pulled over by the police some weeks ago.
The copper said to me "you look nervious".
I'd done nothing wrong, my car was in tip-top condition, I was nervious because this copper had the power to change my life on a whim.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005310</id>
	<title>Re:Positive Feedback Loop?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257520560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>In a turn of events, they are now holding in custody those who are NOT afraid of the government policies at the airports.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In a turn of events , they are now holding in custody those who are NOT afraid of the government policies at the airports .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a turn of events, they are now holding in custody those who are NOT afraid of the government policies at the airports.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006238</id>
	<title>Down in Texas, they used scent to convict and</title>
	<author>Maxo-Texas</author>
	<datestamp>1257526920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now are being sued because the 100\% reliable dogs are not nearly as reliable and the suspects turned out to probably be innocent (at least of the crimes of which they were sent to jail for.</p><p>I don't have a problem with new ideas.  The problem is that police, government officials, and business executives all become completely naive and believe in the complete infallibility of things like this until they are shown to be grossly incorrect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now are being sued because the 100 \ % reliable dogs are not nearly as reliable and the suspects turned out to probably be innocent ( at least of the crimes of which they were sent to jail for.I do n't have a problem with new ideas .
The problem is that police , government officials , and business executives all become completely naive and believe in the complete infallibility of things like this until they are shown to be grossly incorrect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now are being sued because the 100\% reliable dogs are not nearly as reliable and the suspects turned out to probably be innocent (at least of the crimes of which they were sent to jail for.I don't have a problem with new ideas.
The problem is that police, government officials, and business executives all become completely naive and believe in the complete infallibility of things like this until they are shown to be grossly incorrect.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30008566</id>
	<title>Re:Great</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257540360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least you will not have to be afraid that you will somehow avoid being searched.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least you will not have to be afraid that you will somehow avoid being searched .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least you will not have to be afraid that you will somehow avoid being searched.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007030</id>
	<title>Re:Last time I checked...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257531840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It can be if you refuse to take your shoes off at airport security b/c you're afraid folks will laugh at your smelly feet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It can be if you refuse to take your shoes off at airport security b/c you 're afraid folks will laugh at your smelly feet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It can be if you refuse to take your shoes off at airport security b/c you're afraid folks will laugh at your smelly feet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005598</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006490</id>
	<title>Re:Love these comments...</title>
	<author>mayko</author>
	<datestamp>1257528480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...I think the scientists involved already know whether or not a terrorist is more scared than the average person,
I don't have scientific links to back it up, but I'm pretty sure....</p><p>As far as medications, well I think you'd have to take enough meds to kill a horse in order not to be scared that there is a bomb under your nut sack, or that you will be discovered and plugged with 9mm slugs.  Hey, worse case, they make it, study it's effective and it doesn't work and they toss it in the trash, I think it should at least be tried...</p></div><p>"Think, Think, Don't have any science to back it up..." <br> <br>

Nope. I'm not convinced. Your first mistake is trying to imagine that a radical terrorist would be scared of the same things as you or I, and would think logically about failure and repercussions of getting caught. These people plan to die... keep that little tidbit in mind. <br> <br>

Second, you don't have any evidence... for anything. Yet, you still think "it's worth a try" as if this is initiative would be free. It would be a colossal waste of resources and logically it doesn't even make sense. So it isn't even worth a second thought, let alone a try.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...I think the scientists involved already know whether or not a terrorist is more scared than the average person , I do n't have scientific links to back it up , but I 'm pretty sure....As far as medications , well I think you 'd have to take enough meds to kill a horse in order not to be scared that there is a bomb under your nut sack , or that you will be discovered and plugged with 9mm slugs .
Hey , worse case , they make it , study it 's effective and it does n't work and they toss it in the trash , I think it should at least be tried... " Think , Think , Do n't have any science to back it up... " Nope .
I 'm not convinced .
Your first mistake is trying to imagine that a radical terrorist would be scared of the same things as you or I , and would think logically about failure and repercussions of getting caught .
These people plan to die... keep that little tidbit in mind .
Second , you do n't have any evidence... for anything .
Yet , you still think " it 's worth a try " as if this is initiative would be free .
It would be a colossal waste of resources and logically it does n't even make sense .
So it is n't even worth a second thought , let alone a try .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I think the scientists involved already know whether or not a terrorist is more scared than the average person,
I don't have scientific links to back it up, but I'm pretty sure....As far as medications, well I think you'd have to take enough meds to kill a horse in order not to be scared that there is a bomb under your nut sack, or that you will be discovered and plugged with 9mm slugs.
Hey, worse case, they make it, study it's effective and it doesn't work and they toss it in the trash, I think it should at least be tried..."Think, Think, Don't have any science to back it up..."  

Nope.
I'm not convinced.
Your first mistake is trying to imagine that a radical terrorist would be scared of the same things as you or I, and would think logically about failure and repercussions of getting caught.
These people plan to die... keep that little tidbit in mind.
Second, you don't have any evidence... for anything.
Yet, you still think "it's worth a try" as if this is initiative would be free.
It would be a colossal waste of resources and logically it doesn't even make sense.
So it isn't even worth a second thought, let alone a try.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006146</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30008566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30014942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30009952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30008082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30012314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004856
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007616
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30016852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007692
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0837206_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005284
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005598
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30016852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30014942
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005146
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005188
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005796
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005046
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005022
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006058
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30008566
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004958
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005310
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004868
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005064
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007666
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004864
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005118
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005944
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30012314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006040
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004894
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006146
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006572
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007692
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007476
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005208
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005276
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006998
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004962
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007320
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30007648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005098
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30009952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004856
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005150
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004998
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30006038
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005074
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30004904
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0837206.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30005348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0837206.30008082
</commentlist>
</conversation>
