<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_06_0824213</id>
	<title>LHC Shut Down Again &mdash; By Baguette-Dropping Bird</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1257497400000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:folderol@fancypants.org" rel="nofollow">Philip K Dickhead</a> writes <i>"Is Douglas Adams scripting the saga of sorrows facing the LHC?  These <a href="//science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/13/1826206/The-LHC-the-Higgs-Boson-and-Fate">time-traveling Higgs-Boson particles</a> certainly exhibit the sign of his absurd sense of humor!  Perhaps it is the Universe itself, conspiring against the revelations intimated by the operation of CERN's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large\_Hadron\_Collider">Large Hadron Collider?</a>  This time, it is not <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large\_Hadron\_Collider#Construction\_accidents\_and\_delays">falling cranes, cracked magnets, liquid helium leaks</a> or even <a href="//news.slashdot.org/story/09/10/11/0356214/Large-Hadron-Collider-Scientist-Arrested-For-al-Qaeda-Ties">links to Al Qaeda</a>, that have halted man's efforts to understand the meaning of life, the universe and everything.  It now appears that the collider is hindered from an initial firing by a baguette, <a href="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2009-11/bread-loving-bird-shuts-down-lhc">dropped by a passing bird</a>: 'The bird dropped some bread on a section of outdoor machinery, eventually leading to significant overheating in parts of the accelerator. The LHC was not operational at the time of the incident, but the spike produced so much heat that had the beam been on, automatic failsafes would have shut down the machine.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Philip K Dickhead writes " Is Douglas Adams scripting the saga of sorrows facing the LHC ?
These time-traveling Higgs-Boson particles certainly exhibit the sign of his absurd sense of humor !
Perhaps it is the Universe itself , conspiring against the revelations intimated by the operation of CERN 's Large Hadron Collider ?
This time , it is not falling cranes , cracked magnets , liquid helium leaks or even links to Al Qaeda , that have halted man 's efforts to understand the meaning of life , the universe and everything .
It now appears that the collider is hindered from an initial firing by a baguette , dropped by a passing bird : 'The bird dropped some bread on a section of outdoor machinery , eventually leading to significant overheating in parts of the accelerator .
The LHC was not operational at the time of the incident , but the spike produced so much heat that had the beam been on , automatic failsafes would have shut down the machine .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Philip K Dickhead writes "Is Douglas Adams scripting the saga of sorrows facing the LHC?
These time-traveling Higgs-Boson particles certainly exhibit the sign of his absurd sense of humor!
Perhaps it is the Universe itself, conspiring against the revelations intimated by the operation of CERN's Large Hadron Collider?
This time, it is not falling cranes, cracked magnets, liquid helium leaks or even links to Al Qaeda, that have halted man's efforts to understand the meaning of life, the universe and everything.
It now appears that the collider is hindered from an initial firing by a baguette, dropped by a passing bird: 'The bird dropped some bread on a section of outdoor machinery, eventually leading to significant overheating in parts of the accelerator.
The LHC was not operational at the time of the incident, but the spike produced so much heat that had the beam been on, automatic failsafes would have shut down the machine.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005288</id>
	<title>The bird was helping.</title>
	<author>Zarf</author>
	<datestamp>1257520380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All he had was bread. But, the bird knew you needed to hook up the LHC to a sponge cake in order for the LHC to let us understand the universe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All he had was bread .
But , the bird knew you needed to hook up the LHC to a sponge cake in order for the LHC to let us understand the universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All he had was bread.
But, the bird knew you needed to hook up the LHC to a sponge cake in order for the LHC to let us understand the universe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005740</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>Cyberax</author>
	<datestamp>1257523440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Grandparent is not talking about paradoxes. Suppose that a free Higgs boson simply destroys the universe. Then the only remaining universes will be the one where boson is not created.</p><p>It's a bit tautological as is the whole business of 'interpretations' of the quantum mechanics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Grandparent is not talking about paradoxes .
Suppose that a free Higgs boson simply destroys the universe .
Then the only remaining universes will be the one where boson is not created.It 's a bit tautological as is the whole business of 'interpretations ' of the quantum mechanics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Grandparent is not talking about paradoxes.
Suppose that a free Higgs boson simply destroys the universe.
Then the only remaining universes will be the one where boson is not created.It's a bit tautological as is the whole business of 'interpretations' of the quantum mechanics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006678</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>Philip K Dickhead</author>
	<datestamp>1257529680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The universe tolerates paradox. It IS one.  It is our mind, which cannot simultaneously reconcile to apparently contrary propositions.  Through egoism, we assume the universe to conform to the limits of our (un)consciousness.</p><p>The problem with people, in general, is they believe with little questioning that what they <i>think</i> is <i>true</i>.</p><p>Nothing you think is true.  In fact, your thoughts are gone, one moment after you've had them - phantom ephemera, poised between memory and anticipation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The universe tolerates paradox .
It IS one .
It is our mind , which can not simultaneously reconcile to apparently contrary propositions .
Through egoism , we assume the universe to conform to the limits of our ( un ) consciousness.The problem with people , in general , is they believe with little questioning that what they think is true.Nothing you think is true .
In fact , your thoughts are gone , one moment after you 've had them - phantom ephemera , poised between memory and anticipation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The universe tolerates paradox.
It IS one.
It is our mind, which cannot simultaneously reconcile to apparently contrary propositions.
Through egoism, we assume the universe to conform to the limits of our (un)consciousness.The problem with people, in general, is they believe with little questioning that what they think is true.Nothing you think is true.
In fact, your thoughts are gone, one moment after you've had them - phantom ephemera, poised between memory and anticipation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006636</id>
	<title>Cursed!</title>
	<author>md65536</author>
	<datestamp>1257529440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The LHC is now cursed with the hex of pessimistic human expectations.  Whether those who believe the universe will foil it, those who don't believe but will watch closely for it, or those who think they see a pattern and assume future events will fit, too many people are now looking for signs of failure.  Well, whether you look for the good or for the bad in something, you will find it.  Now any minor set-back will be part of some huge conspiracy against the LHC.</p><p>"One of the thousands of scientists at the LHC was stuck in traffic today, delaying an experiment, proving once and for all that God hates the LHC" etc</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The LHC is now cursed with the hex of pessimistic human expectations .
Whether those who believe the universe will foil it , those who do n't believe but will watch closely for it , or those who think they see a pattern and assume future events will fit , too many people are now looking for signs of failure .
Well , whether you look for the good or for the bad in something , you will find it .
Now any minor set-back will be part of some huge conspiracy against the LHC .
" One of the thousands of scientists at the LHC was stuck in traffic today , delaying an experiment , proving once and for all that God hates the LHC " etc</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The LHC is now cursed with the hex of pessimistic human expectations.
Whether those who believe the universe will foil it, those who don't believe but will watch closely for it, or those who think they see a pattern and assume future events will fit, too many people are now looking for signs of failure.
Well, whether you look for the good or for the bad in something, you will find it.
Now any minor set-back will be part of some huge conspiracy against the LHC.
"One of the thousands of scientists at the LHC was stuck in traffic today, delaying an experiment, proving once and for all that God hates the LHC" etc</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30012126</id>
	<title>Baguette</title>
	<author>Torodung</author>
	<datestamp>1257522420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A baguette. It figures! And this is why the LHC should <i>never</i> have been built in France, nor near an Au Bon Pain.</p><p>--<br>Toro</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A baguette .
It figures !
And this is why the LHC should never have been built in France , nor near an Au Bon Pain.--Toro</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A baguette.
It figures!
And this is why the LHC should never have been built in France, nor near an Au Bon Pain.--Toro</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005204</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257519840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Obviously we can't live in one of those universes,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p> </div><p>Yes we can live in those universes because we have not at the "point of time" yet, when we destroy everything.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously we ca n't live in one of those universes , ... Yes we can live in those universes because we have not at the " point of time " yet , when we destroy everything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously we can't live in one of those universes, ... Yes we can live in those universes because we have not at the "point of time" yet, when we destroy everything.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882</id>
	<title>Impossible to operate?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257501780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/physics/article6905250.ece" title="timesonline.co.uk">This article</a> [timesonline.co.uk] gives more information</p><blockquote><div><p>Further investigation into the failure of a cryogenic cooling plant revealed an unusual impediment. A piece of crusty bread had paralysed a high voltage installation that should have been powering the cooling unit. <br>
[...]<br>
A spokeswoman for CERN confirmed that baguette was responsible for the latest hiatus, but she conceded that mystery surrounded the way it got into the vital power installation, which is protected by high security fences.
<br>
&ldquo;Nobody knows how it got there,&rdquo; she told The Times. &ldquo;The best guess is that it was dropped by a bird, either that or it was thrown out of a passing aeroplane.&rdquo;
<br>
&ldquo;Obviously this was slightly surprising. Within the team there was some amusement once they had relaxed after initial concerns.&rdquo;
<br>
The bread was discovered on a busbar - an electrical connection inside one of eight buildings above ground on the 17-mile (27km) circuit in the Swiss countryside.
<br>
The spokeswoman said: &ldquo;The collider extends over a very large area &ndash; you have to have a very comprehensive system to try to avoid problems of this kind. We&rsquo;re talking about a couple of days down time.&rdquo;
<br>
Scientists hope that the temperature will be restored by around midnight tonight allowing work to continue. The failure of the cooler meant the temperature rose around 5 degrees to the equivalent of about -266C.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>A lot of things will drop on sections "of outdoor machinery". It seems that this LHC machine has been designed in such a way that will never get a chance to  work.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This article [ timesonline.co.uk ] gives more informationFurther investigation into the failure of a cryogenic cooling plant revealed an unusual impediment .
A piece of crusty bread had paralysed a high voltage installation that should have been powering the cooling unit .
[ ... ] A spokeswoman for CERN confirmed that baguette was responsible for the latest hiatus , but she conceded that mystery surrounded the way it got into the vital power installation , which is protected by high security fences .
   Nobody knows how it got there ,    she told The Times .
   The best guess is that it was dropped by a bird , either that or it was thrown out of a passing aeroplane.       Obviously this was slightly surprising .
Within the team there was some amusement once they had relaxed after initial concerns.    The bread was discovered on a busbar - an electrical connection inside one of eight buildings above ground on the 17-mile ( 27km ) circuit in the Swiss countryside .
The spokeswoman said :    The collider extends over a very large area    you have to have a very comprehensive system to try to avoid problems of this kind .
We    re talking about a couple of days down time.    Scientists hope that the temperature will be restored by around midnight tonight allowing work to continue .
The failure of the cooler meant the temperature rose around 5 degrees to the equivalent of about -266C .
A lot of things will drop on sections " of outdoor machinery " .
It seems that this LHC machine has been designed in such a way that will never get a chance to work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> This article [timesonline.co.uk] gives more informationFurther investigation into the failure of a cryogenic cooling plant revealed an unusual impediment.
A piece of crusty bread had paralysed a high voltage installation that should have been powering the cooling unit.
[...]
A spokeswoman for CERN confirmed that baguette was responsible for the latest hiatus, but she conceded that mystery surrounded the way it got into the vital power installation, which is protected by high security fences.
“Nobody knows how it got there,” she told The Times.
“The best guess is that it was dropped by a bird, either that or it was thrown out of a passing aeroplane.”

“Obviously this was slightly surprising.
Within the team there was some amusement once they had relaxed after initial concerns.”

The bread was discovered on a busbar - an electrical connection inside one of eight buildings above ground on the 17-mile (27km) circuit in the Swiss countryside.
The spokeswoman said: “The collider extends over a very large area – you have to have a very comprehensive system to try to avoid problems of this kind.
We’re talking about a couple of days down time.”

Scientists hope that the temperature will be restored by around midnight tonight allowing work to continue.
The failure of the cooler meant the temperature rose around 5 degrees to the equivalent of about -266C.
A lot of things will drop on sections "of outdoor machinery".
It seems that this LHC machine has been designed in such a way that will never get a chance to  work.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004950</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1257517980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Hypothesis: There are multiple universes. Many of them build the LHC. In those that build it, most turn it on, destroying themselves. Not only do they destroy themselves, but they take out their planet, their galaxy, and their universe, including time, such that they essentially never existed.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
4th hypothesis - we live in one of those destroyed universes - we just haven't gotten to the "destroy themselves, yadda yadda yadda" part;  The universes simply exist until they don't any more, just like the baguette.
</p><p>
5th hypothesis - the universe is like a baguette - it will reach its "best before date" when the LHC is turned on.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hypothesis : There are multiple universes .
Many of them build the LHC .
In those that build it , most turn it on , destroying themselves .
Not only do they destroy themselves , but they take out their planet , their galaxy , and their universe , including time , such that they essentially never existed .
4th hypothesis - we live in one of those destroyed universes - we just have n't gotten to the " destroy themselves , yadda yadda yadda " part ; The universes simply exist until they do n't any more , just like the baguette .
5th hypothesis - the universe is like a baguette - it will reach its " best before date " when the LHC is turned on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hypothesis: There are multiple universes.
Many of them build the LHC.
In those that build it, most turn it on, destroying themselves.
Not only do they destroy themselves, but they take out their planet, their galaxy, and their universe, including time, such that they essentially never existed.
4th hypothesis - we live in one of those destroyed universes - we just haven't gotten to the "destroy themselves, yadda yadda yadda" part;  The universes simply exist until they don't any more, just like the baguette.
5th hypothesis - the universe is like a baguette - it will reach its "best before date" when the LHC is turned on.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004296</id>
	<title>The force is strong in this one...</title>
	<author>zrbyte</author>
	<datestamp>1257508980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The bird dropped some bread on a section of outdoor machinery, eventually leading to significant over heating in parts of the accelerator."</p><p>I've seen this before. On one side we have a huge and expensive piece of machinery, bent on <a href="http://blogs.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2009/11/critics-of-god.html" title="sciencemag.org" rel="nofollow">destroying a planet</a> [sciencemag.org], using a high energy beam. On the other side we have our hero, cleverly dropping his projectile into the right spot, being able to cripple the machine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The bird dropped some bread on a section of outdoor machinery , eventually leading to significant over heating in parts of the accelerator .
" I 've seen this before .
On one side we have a huge and expensive piece of machinery , bent on destroying a planet [ sciencemag.org ] , using a high energy beam .
On the other side we have our hero , cleverly dropping his projectile into the right spot , being able to cripple the machine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The bird dropped some bread on a section of outdoor machinery, eventually leading to significant over heating in parts of the accelerator.
"I've seen this before.
On one side we have a huge and expensive piece of machinery, bent on destroying a planet [sciencemag.org], using a high energy beam.
On the other side we have our hero, cleverly dropping his projectile into the right spot, being able to cripple the machine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007672</id>
	<title>Re:Confused</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257535740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, to be fair, if they did, you wouldn't be able to observe that, either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , to be fair , if they did , you would n't be able to observe that , either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, to be fair, if they did, you wouldn't be able to observe that, either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005018</id>
	<title>4th</title>
	<author>Joe The Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1257518520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It lets do time travel some goes back to kill Hitler only to have Stalin or some even worse to come to power makeing ww2 go on for a much longer time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It lets do time travel some goes back to kill Hitler only to have Stalin or some even worse to come to power makeing ww2 go on for a much longer time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It lets do time travel some goes back to kill Hitler only to have Stalin or some even worse to come to power makeing ww2 go on for a much longer time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003904</id>
	<title>le sigh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257502080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... and why, pray tell, was such apparently critical equipment not in some sort of enclosure?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... and why , pray tell , was such apparently critical equipment not in some sort of enclosure ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and why, pray tell, was such apparently critical equipment not in some sort of enclosure?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004826</id>
	<title>I think you are missing the real culprit.</title>
	<author>Winchestershire</author>
	<datestamp>1257517140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It seems The Doctor is trying his darnedest to stop us from using this machine.  Could it be that this is Dalek technology we are playing with?</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems The Doctor is trying his darnedest to stop us from using this machine .
Could it be that this is Dalek technology we are playing with ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems The Doctor is trying his darnedest to stop us from using this machine.
Could it be that this is Dalek technology we are playing with?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005228</id>
	<title>Re:Impossible to operate?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257520020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are rushing to get it up and running instead of fixing problems with the design, they said as much when they announced they would get it up and running so quickly. IMO some heads need to roll and somebody who wants to do it right needs to be put in charge otherwise every couple of years it will run for a couple of days then crash ($WINDOWS\_JOKE) and we will never get much meaningful data</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are rushing to get it up and running instead of fixing problems with the design , they said as much when they announced they would get it up and running so quickly .
IMO some heads need to roll and somebody who wants to do it right needs to be put in charge otherwise every couple of years it will run for a couple of days then crash ( $ WINDOWS \ _JOKE ) and we will never get much meaningful data</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are rushing to get it up and running instead of fixing problems with the design, they said as much when they announced they would get it up and running so quickly.
IMO some heads need to roll and somebody who wants to do it right needs to be put in charge otherwise every couple of years it will run for a couple of days then crash ($WINDOWS\_JOKE) and we will never get much meaningful data</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007188</id>
	<title>Geez, any more setbacks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257532680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At some point, aren't they just going to realize that the invisible sky wizard would like them to stop? He put 6 days into making this world, and doesn't want to see some amateurs blow the whole thing</htmltext>
<tokenext>At some point , are n't they just going to realize that the invisible sky wizard would like them to stop ?
He put 6 days into making this world , and does n't want to see some amateurs blow the whole thing</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At some point, aren't they just going to realize that the invisible sky wizard would like them to stop?
He put 6 days into making this world, and doesn't want to see some amateurs blow the whole thing</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007104</id>
	<title>news from CERN</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257532200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://user.web.cern.ch/user/news/2009/091106b.html</p><p>News: 6 November 2009</p><p>LHC "bird-bread" strike</p><p>On Tuesday 3 November, a bird carrying a baguette bread caused a short<br>circuit in an electrical outdoor installation that serves sectors 7-8 and<br>8-1 of the LHC. The knock-on effects included an interruption to the<br>operation of the LHC cryogenics system. The bird escaped unharmed but<br>lost its bread.</p><p>The standard failsafe systems came into operation and after the cause<br>was identified, re-cooling of the machine began and the sectors were<br>back at operating temperature last night. The incident was similar in<br>effect to a standard power cut, for which the machine protection systems<br>are very well prepared.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //user.web.cern.ch/user/news/2009/091106b.htmlNews : 6 November 2009LHC " bird-bread " strikeOn Tuesday 3 November , a bird carrying a baguette bread caused a shortcircuit in an electrical outdoor installation that serves sectors 7-8 and8-1 of the LHC .
The knock-on effects included an interruption to theoperation of the LHC cryogenics system .
The bird escaped unharmed butlost its bread.The standard failsafe systems came into operation and after the causewas identified , re-cooling of the machine began and the sectors wereback at operating temperature last night .
The incident was similar ineffect to a standard power cut , for which the machine protection systemsare very well prepared .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://user.web.cern.ch/user/news/2009/091106b.htmlNews: 6 November 2009LHC "bird-bread" strikeOn Tuesday 3 November, a bird carrying a baguette bread caused a shortcircuit in an electrical outdoor installation that serves sectors 7-8 and8-1 of the LHC.
The knock-on effects included an interruption to theoperation of the LHC cryogenics system.
The bird escaped unharmed butlost its bread.The standard failsafe systems came into operation and after the causewas identified, re-cooling of the machine began and the sectors wereback at operating temperature last night.
The incident was similar ineffect to a standard power cut, for which the machine protection systemsare very well prepared.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30010668</id>
	<title>Re:A bird carrying a baguette - I think not!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257506940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a little early to start claiming evidence for those pesky string theorists, don't you think?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a little early to start claiming evidence for those pesky string theorists , do n't you think ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a little early to start claiming evidence for those pesky string theorists, don't you think?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003914</id>
	<title>I hate you for that misleading headline!</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1257502200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>the spike produced so much heat that <strong>had</strong> the beam been on, automatic failsafes <strong>would have</strong> shut down the machine.</p></div><p>And <strong>had</strong> I been there at the writing of this headline, I <strong>would have</strong> kicked his ass! ^^</p><p>Wait for the next article's headline to be: <em>Someone Kicked Philip K Dickhead's Ass Again!</em> (Because I bet, with that name, it happened more than once already.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the spike produced so much heat that had the beam been on , automatic failsafes would have shut down the machine.And had I been there at the writing of this headline , I would have kicked his ass !
^ ^ Wait for the next article 's headline to be : Someone Kicked Philip K Dickhead 's Ass Again !
( Because I bet , with that name , it happened more than once already .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the spike produced so much heat that had the beam been on, automatic failsafes would have shut down the machine.And had I been there at the writing of this headline, I would have kicked his ass!
^^Wait for the next article's headline to be: Someone Kicked Philip K Dickhead's Ass Again!
(Because I bet, with that name, it happened more than once already.
;)
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30014682</id>
	<title>Unforeseen Consequences</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257614820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was not a bird, just Gordon Freeman eating a sandwich between two portal jumps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was not a bird , just Gordon Freeman eating a sandwich between two portal jumps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was not a bird, just Gordon Freeman eating a sandwich between two portal jumps.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30010430</id>
	<title>Re:"Womp Rats" is code for "minorities"</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1257505440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>There is no other fauna shown on his desert homeworld that is "about two meters" Everything was much larger or much smaller, even in the remastered edition.</i></p><p>Look, Luke's not used to the metric system because Tatooine uses Imperial units (groan).  Second, he sucks at estimating sizes, okay?  Without the Force he never would have had a chance of hitting that exhaust port.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no other fauna shown on his desert homeworld that is " about two meters " Everything was much larger or much smaller , even in the remastered edition.Look , Luke 's not used to the metric system because Tatooine uses Imperial units ( groan ) .
Second , he sucks at estimating sizes , okay ?
Without the Force he never would have had a chance of hitting that exhaust port .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no other fauna shown on his desert homeworld that is "about two meters" Everything was much larger or much smaller, even in the remastered edition.Look, Luke's not used to the metric system because Tatooine uses Imperial units (groan).
Second, he sucks at estimating sizes, okay?
Without the Force he never would have had a chance of hitting that exhaust port.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006922</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1257531120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're thinking of the "apathetic" universe where there is no disciplined, rigid linear time and instead things happen all willy nilly in random order. This universe is in the adolescent stage of development, creating galaxies, dieties, science fiction writers and so on more or less at random. It's unwilling to clean up all those black holes unless threatened with having it's latest software taken away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're thinking of the " apathetic " universe where there is no disciplined , rigid linear time and instead things happen all willy nilly in random order .
This universe is in the adolescent stage of development , creating galaxies , dieties , science fiction writers and so on more or less at random .
It 's unwilling to clean up all those black holes unless threatened with having it 's latest software taken away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're thinking of the "apathetic" universe where there is no disciplined, rigid linear time and instead things happen all willy nilly in random order.
This universe is in the adolescent stage of development, creating galaxies, dieties, science fiction writers and so on more or less at random.
It's unwilling to clean up all those black holes unless threatened with having it's latest software taken away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006248</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>philgp</author>
	<datestamp>1257527040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>But surely that's just another way of saying "It's impossible to create free Higgs Bosons".</htmltext>
<tokenext>But surely that 's just another way of saying " It 's impossible to create free Higgs Bosons " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But surely that's just another way of saying "It's impossible to create free Higgs Bosons".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004486</id>
	<title>WTF?</title>
	<author>EmagGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1257512220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why isn't the outdoor "machinery" protected from debris ingress???</p><p>It was cool to check out the temp and pressure in the various sectors, but they are cleverly obscuring the data from Sector 7-G. I wonder why...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is n't the outdoor " machinery " protected from debris ingress ? ?
? It was cool to check out the temp and pressure in the various sectors , but they are cleverly obscuring the data from Sector 7-G. I wonder why.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why isn't the outdoor "machinery" protected from debris ingress??
?It was cool to check out the temp and pressure in the various sectors, but they are cleverly obscuring the data from Sector 7-G. I wonder why...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005080</id>
	<title>Douglas Adams twist...</title>
	<author>MickyTheIdiot</author>
	<datestamp>1257519000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The real Douglas Adams twist wasn't really reported.  The baguette came from the Heart of Gold.  Ford Prefect caused a very small dimensional hole when he threw it out the window.  Luckily, we can report that the crisps were very good so the whole incident is justified.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The real Douglas Adams twist was n't really reported .
The baguette came from the Heart of Gold .
Ford Prefect caused a very small dimensional hole when he threw it out the window .
Luckily , we can report that the crisps were very good so the whole incident is justified .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real Douglas Adams twist wasn't really reported.
The baguette came from the Heart of Gold.
Ford Prefect caused a very small dimensional hole when he threw it out the window.
Luckily, we can report that the crisps were very good so the whole incident is justified.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004564</id>
	<title>Could the bird be sent by God?</title>
	<author>ff1324</author>
	<datestamp>1257513600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps there is a religious reason. Has anyone considered the bird may have been send by God to drop the bread to halt activation of the LHC?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps there is a religious reason .
Has anyone considered the bird may have been send by God to drop the bread to halt activation of the LHC ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps there is a religious reason.
Has anyone considered the bird may have been send by God to drop the bread to halt activation of the LHC?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004472</id>
	<title>Re:Bird briefing...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257511980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IT'S A TRAP!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IT 'S A TRAP !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IT'S A TRAP!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007138</id>
	<title>Re:Philip K Dickhead</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1257532380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Posting things like this on the front page makes<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. look very childish.</i></p><p>OH NOES!   How will we <b>EVER</b> recover Slashdot's good name?!</p><p><i>Timothy, you should know better.</i></p><p>You MUST be...  very fun at parties.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Posting things like this on the front page makes / .
look very childish.OH NOES !
How will we EVER recover Slashdot 's good name ?
! Timothy , you should know better.You MUST be... very fun at parties .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Posting things like this on the front page makes /.
look very childish.OH NOES!
How will we EVER recover Slashdot's good name?
!Timothy, you should know better.You MUST be...  very fun at parties.
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007046</id>
	<title>As much as it cost to build...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257531900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and they didn't add a roof?</p><p>Low-bidder awards will get you every time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and they did n't add a roof ? Low-bidder awards will get you every time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and they didn't add a roof?Low-bidder awards will get you every time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005702</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>pjbgravely</author>
	<datestamp>1257523260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since Earth is a type 13 planet, calculating the mass of the Higgs Boson will only squash the planet to the size of a pea. Not the whole universe.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since Earth is a type 13 planet , calculating the mass of the Higgs Boson will only squash the planet to the size of a pea .
Not the whole universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since Earth is a type 13 planet, calculating the mass of the Higgs Boson will only squash the planet to the size of a pea.
Not the whole universe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004416</id>
	<title>Why isn't anyone seeing the obvious?</title>
	<author>jcr</author>
	<datestamp>1257511020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the work of anti-science sabageutteurs.</p><p>-jcr</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the work of anti-science sabageutteurs.-jcr</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the work of anti-science sabageutteurs.-jcr</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006482</id>
	<title>Re:Impossible to operate?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257528420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It seems that this LHC machine has been designed in such a way that will never get a chance to work.</i> </p><p>Hmmm...I have a car like that...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems that this LHC machine has been designed in such a way that will never get a chance to work .
Hmmm...I have a car like that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems that this LHC machine has been designed in such a way that will never get a chance to work.
Hmmm...I have a car like that...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007908</id>
	<title>Re:All the universes where the bread missed a busb</title>
	<author>FrigBot</author>
	<datestamp>1257537120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Multi-reply:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>On the other hand, if the LHC is really a universe suicide machine then there must be an uncountable number of universes which died, due to the baguette hitting the wrong exterior portion of the LHC, etc.</p></div><p>Yeah. This would also mean our civilization is the most advanced out of any and all other intelligent civilizations out there. Or maybe that we are the only ones that haven't realized the LHC will destroy our universe (small "u"). If that's the case, then presuming that experiments which are only executable by using an LHC are required for Star-Trek-style interstellar travel and communication, there's no way for another (more advanced) civilization to tell us what's going on. Wierd.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I find the whole concept that we can destroy the Universe fundamentally ridiculous.</p></div><p>Agreed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Multi-reply : On the other hand , if the LHC is really a universe suicide machine then there must be an uncountable number of universes which died , due to the baguette hitting the wrong exterior portion of the LHC , etc.Yeah .
This would also mean our civilization is the most advanced out of any and all other intelligent civilizations out there .
Or maybe that we are the only ones that have n't realized the LHC will destroy our universe ( small " u " ) .
If that 's the case , then presuming that experiments which are only executable by using an LHC are required for Star-Trek-style interstellar travel and communication , there 's no way for another ( more advanced ) civilization to tell us what 's going on .
Wierd.I find the whole concept that we can destroy the Universe fundamentally ridiculous.Agreed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Multi-reply:On the other hand, if the LHC is really a universe suicide machine then there must be an uncountable number of universes which died, due to the baguette hitting the wrong exterior portion of the LHC, etc.Yeah.
This would also mean our civilization is the most advanced out of any and all other intelligent civilizations out there.
Or maybe that we are the only ones that haven't realized the LHC will destroy our universe (small "u").
If that's the case, then presuming that experiments which are only executable by using an LHC are required for Star-Trek-style interstellar travel and communication, there's no way for another (more advanced) civilization to tell us what's going on.
Wierd.I find the whole concept that we can destroy the Universe fundamentally ridiculous.Agreed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30008296</id>
	<title>Is it possible that nobody has yet....</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1257539040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Welcomed our new dough-obsessed avian overlords?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcomed our new dough-obsessed avian overlords ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Welcomed our new dough-obsessed avian overlords?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004104</id>
	<title>Polarization</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257505740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't decide whether I am pissed off (I was waiting for the LHC results like a little child who waits for his birthday present) or if I should burst out in laughing...</p><p>I guess I am both at the same time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't decide whether I am pissed off ( I was waiting for the LHC results like a little child who waits for his birthday present ) or if I should burst out in laughing...I guess I am both at the same time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't decide whether I am pissed off (I was waiting for the LHC results like a little child who waits for his birthday present) or if I should burst out in laughing...I guess I am both at the same time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006080</id>
	<title>It's called a roof you morons!</title>
	<author>Cathoderoytube</author>
	<datestamp>1257526020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So you're telling me this multi-billion dollar piece of machinery just has parts of it exposed to the open air that birds can get into, or at least drop stuff into, and that's all it takes to make it shut down?

Did they run out of plywood while cobbling this thing together? Or did the bucket of rocks holding the tarp in place over the component get knocked over by some pesky raccoon?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So you 're telling me this multi-billion dollar piece of machinery just has parts of it exposed to the open air that birds can get into , or at least drop stuff into , and that 's all it takes to make it shut down ?
Did they run out of plywood while cobbling this thing together ?
Or did the bucket of rocks holding the tarp in place over the component get knocked over by some pesky raccoon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you're telling me this multi-billion dollar piece of machinery just has parts of it exposed to the open air that birds can get into, or at least drop stuff into, and that's all it takes to make it shut down?
Did they run out of plywood while cobbling this thing together?
Or did the bucket of rocks holding the tarp in place over the component get knocked over by some pesky raccoon?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30013916</id>
	<title>Re:The temp rise in question</title>
	<author>amiran</author>
	<datestamp>1257604080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <a href="http://hcc.web.cern.ch/hcc/cryo\_main/cryo\_main.php?region=Sector81" title="web.cern.ch" rel="nofollow">http://hcc.web.cern.ch/hcc/cryo\_main/cryo\_main.php?region=Sector81</a> [web.cern.ch] </p><p>Pretty wild to think that a rise up to 8 kelvin is a "serious overtemp event".</p><p>(And fancy CERN having all their engineering data online like that, open to everyone..... anyone'd think they invented the internet or something.)</p></div><p>Server:Microsoft-IIS/6.0<br>X-Powered-By:PHP/5.2.9, ASP.NET</p><p>Interesting to know what the web inventors are using.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //hcc.web.cern.ch/hcc/cryo \ _main/cryo \ _main.php ? region = Sector81 [ web.cern.ch ] Pretty wild to think that a rise up to 8 kelvin is a " serious overtemp event " .
( And fancy CERN having all their engineering data online like that , open to everyone..... anyone 'd think they invented the internet or something .
) Server : Microsoft-IIS/6.0X-Powered-By : PHP/5.2.9 , ASP.NETInteresting to know what the web inventors are using .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> http://hcc.web.cern.ch/hcc/cryo\_main/cryo\_main.php?region=Sector81 [web.cern.ch] Pretty wild to think that a rise up to 8 kelvin is a "serious overtemp event".
(And fancy CERN having all their engineering data online like that, open to everyone..... anyone'd think they invented the internet or something.
)Server:Microsoft-IIS/6.0X-Powered-By:PHP/5.2.9, ASP.NETInteresting to know what the web inventors are using.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005032</id>
	<title>Re:Impossible to operate?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257518640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Must have been American, artificial chemical laden bread.  For it to land on a bus-bar and disrupt things, rather than just be vaporized, I mean.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Must have been American , artificial chemical laden bread .
For it to land on a bus-bar and disrupt things , rather than just be vaporized , I mean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Must have been American, artificial chemical laden bread.
For it to land on a bus-bar and disrupt things, rather than just be vaporized, I mean.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004932</id>
	<title>oblig</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257517800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, the LHC doesn't consider a small bird to be any threat, or they'd have a tighter defense.  But the approach will not be easy. You are required to maneuver straight down this trench and skim the surface to this point. The target area is only two meters wide. The shaft leads directly to the reactor system. A precise hit will start a chain reaction which should destroy the accelerator. Only a precise hit will set off a chain reaction. The shaft is small, so you'll have to use baguettes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , the LHC does n't consider a small bird to be any threat , or they 'd have a tighter defense .
But the approach will not be easy .
You are required to maneuver straight down this trench and skim the surface to this point .
The target area is only two meters wide .
The shaft leads directly to the reactor system .
A precise hit will start a chain reaction which should destroy the accelerator .
Only a precise hit will set off a chain reaction .
The shaft is small , so you 'll have to use baguettes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, the LHC doesn't consider a small bird to be any threat, or they'd have a tighter defense.
But the approach will not be easy.
You are required to maneuver straight down this trench and skim the surface to this point.
The target area is only two meters wide.
The shaft leads directly to the reactor system.
A precise hit will start a chain reaction which should destroy the accelerator.
Only a precise hit will set off a chain reaction.
The shaft is small, so you'll have to use baguettes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30016238</id>
	<title>Re:All the universes where the bread missed a busb</title>
	<author>iacvlvs</author>
	<datestamp>1257626100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting idea. The baguette isn't a huge deal because it won't delay the activation of the Collider but that's only one of the absurd things to happen to it, many of which have caused delays.<br>
<br>
If the sheer number of alternate universes is contributing to our survival<br>
and each time we avoid destruction, the number of universes is reduced<br>
then perhaps it would benefit us to seed the multiverse with more universes.<br>
<br>
I'm going to be letting <a href="http://www.fourmilab.ch/hotbits/" title="fourmilab.ch" rel="nofollow">HotBits</a> [fourmilab.ch] make my decisions for a while. They supply random numbers based on radioactive decay. I'm hoping my experiment will propagate superposition to the macro world and increasing the chance that some instance of me survives whatever nasty unexpected consequences the LHC's activation may have.<br>
<br>
Of course one could argue that my our present existence proof that nothing happens in the future that destroys this universe's past.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting idea .
The baguette is n't a huge deal because it wo n't delay the activation of the Collider but that 's only one of the absurd things to happen to it , many of which have caused delays .
If the sheer number of alternate universes is contributing to our survival and each time we avoid destruction , the number of universes is reduced then perhaps it would benefit us to seed the multiverse with more universes .
I 'm going to be letting HotBits [ fourmilab.ch ] make my decisions for a while .
They supply random numbers based on radioactive decay .
I 'm hoping my experiment will propagate superposition to the macro world and increasing the chance that some instance of me survives whatever nasty unexpected consequences the LHC 's activation may have .
Of course one could argue that my our present existence proof that nothing happens in the future that destroys this universe 's past .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting idea.
The baguette isn't a huge deal because it won't delay the activation of the Collider but that's only one of the absurd things to happen to it, many of which have caused delays.
If the sheer number of alternate universes is contributing to our survival
and each time we avoid destruction, the number of universes is reduced
then perhaps it would benefit us to seed the multiverse with more universes.
I'm going to be letting HotBits [fourmilab.ch] make my decisions for a while.
They supply random numbers based on radioactive decay.
I'm hoping my experiment will propagate superposition to the macro world and increasing the chance that some instance of me survives whatever nasty unexpected consequences the LHC's activation may have.
Of course one could argue that my our present existence proof that nothing happens in the future that destroys this universe's past.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942</id>
	<title>Here's an idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257502680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hypothesis: There are multiple universes.  Many of them build the LHC.  In those that build it, most turn it on, destroying themselves.  Not only do they destroy themselves, but they take out their planet, their galaxy, and their universe, including time, such that they essentially never existed.</p><p>Obviously we can't live in one of those universes, so a series of accidents, bizarre or mundane, probably take place until someone decides it's not worth the effort and the project is scrapped.</p><p>That would explain the long delays and the mind-bogglingly arbitrary accidents.</p><p>Alternative hypothesis: The LHC is an internationally-funded, politically-changed science experiment of immense complexity.  That alone would explain the delays and problems, and would also lead to it probably never being switched on.</p><p>3rd hypothesis: The LHC is switched on eventually, gives us much scientific knowledge, and doesn't kill us all.  But really, that's boring and doesn't make for compelling science fiction.  Just compelled science.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hypothesis : There are multiple universes .
Many of them build the LHC .
In those that build it , most turn it on , destroying themselves .
Not only do they destroy themselves , but they take out their planet , their galaxy , and their universe , including time , such that they essentially never existed.Obviously we ca n't live in one of those universes , so a series of accidents , bizarre or mundane , probably take place until someone decides it 's not worth the effort and the project is scrapped.That would explain the long delays and the mind-bogglingly arbitrary accidents.Alternative hypothesis : The LHC is an internationally-funded , politically-changed science experiment of immense complexity .
That alone would explain the delays and problems , and would also lead to it probably never being switched on.3rd hypothesis : The LHC is switched on eventually , gives us much scientific knowledge , and does n't kill us all .
But really , that 's boring and does n't make for compelling science fiction .
Just compelled science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hypothesis: There are multiple universes.
Many of them build the LHC.
In those that build it, most turn it on, destroying themselves.
Not only do they destroy themselves, but they take out their planet, their galaxy, and their universe, including time, such that they essentially never existed.Obviously we can't live in one of those universes, so a series of accidents, bizarre or mundane, probably take place until someone decides it's not worth the effort and the project is scrapped.That would explain the long delays and the mind-bogglingly arbitrary accidents.Alternative hypothesis: The LHC is an internationally-funded, politically-changed science experiment of immense complexity.
That alone would explain the delays and problems, and would also lead to it probably never being switched on.3rd hypothesis: The LHC is switched on eventually, gives us much scientific knowledge, and doesn't kill us all.
But really, that's boring and doesn't make for compelling science fiction.
Just compelled science.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30012798</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>garompeta</author>
	<datestamp>1257624120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>4th hypothesis, in the history of universe the activation of the LHC is a asymptote. No matter how many times you try to get closer to the activation, we might be infinitely trying to activate it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>4th hypothesis , in the history of universe the activation of the LHC is a asymptote .
No matter how many times you try to get closer to the activation , we might be infinitely trying to activate it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4th hypothesis, in the history of universe the activation of the LHC is a asymptote.
No matter how many times you try to get closer to the activation, we might be infinitely trying to activate it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30016054</id>
	<title>Terrorist Plot</title>
	<author>digitalPhant0m</author>
	<datestamp>1257624600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The bird was obviously trained by Al Qaeda.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The bird was obviously trained by Al Qaeda .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The bird was obviously trained by Al Qaeda.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005686</id>
	<title>Re:Put a roof over it or something?</title>
	<author>danlip</author>
	<datestamp>1257523200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right, who build this thing?  The French?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right , who build this thing ?
The French ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right, who build this thing?
The French?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006512</id>
	<title>Re:Everyone should have one...</title>
	<author>OwMyBrain</author>
	<datestamp>1257528660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only until the Cylons are built!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only until the Cylons are built !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only until the Cylons are built!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007074</id>
	<title>Re:Everyone should have one...</title>
	<author>EndoplasmicRidiculus</author>
	<datestamp>1257532080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It needs to be if they plan on toasting bread with temperatures near absolute zero.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It needs to be if they plan on toasting bread with temperatures near absolute zero .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It needs to be if they plan on toasting bread with temperatures near absolute zero.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004368</id>
	<title>I think that....</title>
	<author>davidmcg</author>
	<datestamp>1257510300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>a remake of Alfred Hitchcocks 'The Birds' is in order.</htmltext>
<tokenext>a remake of Alfred Hitchcocks 'The Birds ' is in order .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a remake of Alfred Hitchcocks 'The Birds' is in order.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007846</id>
	<title>Re:Impossible to operate?</title>
	<author>physburn</author>
	<datestamp>1257536820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So according to both article, there isn't going to be a signicant delay from the baguette, and the machine will still be switched
on at the end of November. Looks like the "time travelling higg boson" (do we need a new theory for gremlins? and do we really need
to supercede the law of Murphy, i think not), failed to cause any real damage this time.
<p>
---
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/LHC/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com">LHC</a> [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ <a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/" title="feeddistiller.com">Feed Distiller</a> [feeddistiller.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So according to both article , there is n't going to be a signicant delay from the baguette , and the machine will still be switched on at the end of November .
Looks like the " time travelling higg boson " ( do we need a new theory for gremlins ?
and do we really need to supercede the law of Murphy , i think not ) , failed to cause any real damage this time .
--- LHC [ feeddistiller.com ] Feed @ Feed Distiller [ feeddistiller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So according to both article, there isn't going to be a signicant delay from the baguette, and the machine will still be switched
on at the end of November.
Looks like the "time travelling higg boson" (do we need a new theory for gremlins?
and do we really need
to supercede the law of Murphy, i think not), failed to cause any real damage this time.
---

LHC [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004860</id>
	<title>it's either a mouse or dolphin!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257517320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure, a bird did it...That's what the mice wants us to think !!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , a bird did it...That 's what the mice wants us to think ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, a bird did it...That's what the mice wants us to think !!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003966</id>
	<title>Gnomes</title>
	<author>Msdose</author>
	<datestamp>1257503160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The LHC requires a mission-critical specialized lubricant made from rare Peruvian wackova beans and refined on the space station, but they just used old chewing gum.</p><p>What did the seven dwarves say when they passed Snow White working on the streetcorner? Hi ho, Hi ho.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The LHC requires a mission-critical specialized lubricant made from rare Peruvian wackova beans and refined on the space station , but they just used old chewing gum.What did the seven dwarves say when they passed Snow White working on the streetcorner ?
Hi ho , Hi ho .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The LHC requires a mission-critical specialized lubricant made from rare Peruvian wackova beans and refined on the space station, but they just used old chewing gum.What did the seven dwarves say when they passed Snow White working on the streetcorner?
Hi ho, Hi ho.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006580</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257529020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or, we live in a simulation and someone's screwing with us for kicks...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , we live in a simulation and someone 's screwing with us for kicks.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, we live in a simulation and someone's screwing with us for kicks...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004430</id>
	<title>Re:Put a roof over it or something?</title>
	<author>jcr</author>
	<datestamp>1257511200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i> what kind of vulnerable kit is this anyways?</i></p><p>We have a phrase for this kind of shoddy job here in the USA.  "close enough for government work".</p><p>-jcr</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what kind of vulnerable kit is this anyways ? We have a phrase for this kind of shoddy job here in the USA .
" close enough for government work " .-jcr</tokentext>
<sentencetext> what kind of vulnerable kit is this anyways?We have a phrase for this kind of shoddy job here in the USA.
"close enough for government work".-jcr</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004770</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1257516600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Only if the universe cannot tolerate a paradox.
</p><p>
There is no proof that the universe won't allow paradoxes, such as going back in time and shooting your grandparents before your parents are born.
</p><p>
*WE* think its paradoxical, and therefore it "can't happen that way".  One doesn't necessarily lead to the other - we just assume it does.
</p><p>
Maybe the universe simply "doesn't give a shit"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...  and that actually appears to be the case, not just from this, but from the whole "arrow of time" perspective.  To someone whose frame of reference isn't constrained by a unidirectional arrow of time, paradoxes cease to be paradoxes. To them, if you go back in time and kill your grandparents before you were born, you continue to exist. No paradox, it just is what it is. It's allowed.
</p><p>
It's certainly a better explanation of everything than the "infinite multiple branching worlds" theory (and gives rise to a universe where the branching worlds theory would actually appear to be true).
</p><p>
and yes, you can subscribe to my newsletter explaining our baguette-flinging overlords<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only if the universe can not tolerate a paradox .
There is no proof that the universe wo n't allow paradoxes , such as going back in time and shooting your grandparents before your parents are born .
* WE * think its paradoxical , and therefore it " ca n't happen that way " .
One does n't necessarily lead to the other - we just assume it does .
Maybe the universe simply " does n't give a shit " ... and that actually appears to be the case , not just from this , but from the whole " arrow of time " perspective .
To someone whose frame of reference is n't constrained by a unidirectional arrow of time , paradoxes cease to be paradoxes .
To them , if you go back in time and kill your grandparents before you were born , you continue to exist .
No paradox , it just is what it is .
It 's allowed .
It 's certainly a better explanation of everything than the " infinite multiple branching worlds " theory ( and gives rise to a universe where the branching worlds theory would actually appear to be true ) .
and yes , you can subscribe to my newsletter explaining our baguette-flinging overlords : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Only if the universe cannot tolerate a paradox.
There is no proof that the universe won't allow paradoxes, such as going back in time and shooting your grandparents before your parents are born.
*WE* think its paradoxical, and therefore it "can't happen that way".
One doesn't necessarily lead to the other - we just assume it does.
Maybe the universe simply "doesn't give a shit" ...  and that actually appears to be the case, not just from this, but from the whole "arrow of time" perspective.
To someone whose frame of reference isn't constrained by a unidirectional arrow of time, paradoxes cease to be paradoxes.
To them, if you go back in time and kill your grandparents before you were born, you continue to exist.
No paradox, it just is what it is.
It's allowed.
It's certainly a better explanation of everything than the "infinite multiple branching worlds" theory (and gives rise to a universe where the branching worlds theory would actually appear to be true).
and yes, you can subscribe to my newsletter explaining our baguette-flinging overlords :-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30171700</id>
	<title>You people don't get it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258735440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't you people get it???  The bird is gay!  He was crossing the LHC to get to the 'other side.'  That's why they call it "the other side", because they're gay!  And if you eat that French Baguette, you'll be gay too!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't you people get it ? ? ?
The bird is gay !
He was crossing the LHC to get to the 'other side .
' That 's why they call it " the other side " , because they 're gay !
And if you eat that French Baguette , you 'll be gay too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't you people get it???
The bird is gay!
He was crossing the LHC to get to the 'other side.
'  That's why they call it "the other side", because they're gay!
And if you eat that French Baguette, you'll be gay too!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007660</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>GoodNicksAreTaken</author>
	<datestamp>1257535680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's leave it on and see just how weird things get. Every time we try to turn it on very random things start happening? What if we could harness that infinite improbability to drive a ship?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's leave it on and see just how weird things get .
Every time we try to turn it on very random things start happening ?
What if we could harness that infinite improbability to drive a ship ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's leave it on and see just how weird things get.
Every time we try to turn it on very random things start happening?
What if we could harness that infinite improbability to drive a ship?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30012828</id>
	<title>42</title>
	<author>kutulu13</author>
	<datestamp>1257624540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The answer is 42... move along....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The answer is 42... move along... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The answer is 42... move along....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30008518</id>
	<title>Nature speaks, you listen.</title>
	<author>Khyber</author>
	<datestamp>1257540120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In this case, nature just said "Fuck your particle physics, bitch! Baguette to the dome!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In this case , nature just said " Fuck your particle physics , bitch !
Baguette to the dome !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In this case, nature just said "Fuck your particle physics, bitch!
Baguette to the dome!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006042</id>
	<title>Re:Impossible to operate?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257525840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The collider extends over a very large area &ndash; you have to have a very comprehensive system to try to avoid problems of this kind."</p><p>Plastic owls and paper silhouettes are "very comprehensive systems"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The collider extends over a very large area    you have to have a very comprehensive system to try to avoid problems of this kind .
" Plastic owls and paper silhouettes are " very comprehensive systems " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The collider extends over a very large area – you have to have a very comprehensive system to try to avoid problems of this kind.
"Plastic owls and paper silhouettes are "very comprehensive systems"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004622</id>
	<title>All I can say is...</title>
	<author>Scragglykat</author>
	<datestamp>1257514500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...uh boppa ooh mow mow, boppa ooh mow mow, uh boppa ooh mow mow, boppa ooh mow mow...</htmltext>
<tokenext>...uh boppa ooh mow mow , boppa ooh mow mow , uh boppa ooh mow mow , boppa ooh mow mow.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...uh boppa ooh mow mow, boppa ooh mow mow, uh boppa ooh mow mow, boppa ooh mow mow...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007172</id>
	<title>It's a signage problem.</title>
	<author>Jay L</author>
	<datestamp>1257532620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>New sign:</p><p><b>Please do not be fed by the birds.</b></p><p>Problem solved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>New sign : Please do not be fed by the birds.Problem solved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>New sign:Please do not be fed by the birds.Problem solved.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009246</id>
	<title>Further proof</title>
	<author>gmulert</author>
	<datestamp>1257499920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I clicked "read more," Slashdot displayed exactly <b>42</b> full comments.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I clicked " read more , " Slashdot displayed exactly 42 full comments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I clicked "read more," Slashdot displayed exactly 42 full comments.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004722</id>
	<title>The official CERN comment on the incident</title>
	<author>CosmicRabbit</author>
	<datestamp>1257515820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is <a href="http://user.web.cern.ch/user/news/2009/091106b.html" title="web.cern.ch" rel="nofollow">here</a> [web.cern.ch]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is here [ web.cern.ch ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is here [web.cern.ch]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006632</id>
	<title>Sabotage?</title>
	<author>OwMyBrain</author>
	<datestamp>1257529440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How long does this have to go on before people seriously start to suspect sabotage of the LHC? The time travel theories are funny, but there are enough people vehemently opposed to the experiment ("Oh, no black holez will destroy teh worldz!", "It is morally wrong to search for God's particle") that I would think sabotage to be a fairly plausible explanation for repeated failures. But maybe that's the tin foil hat speaking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How long does this have to go on before people seriously start to suspect sabotage of the LHC ?
The time travel theories are funny , but there are enough people vehemently opposed to the experiment ( " Oh , no black holez will destroy teh worldz !
" , " It is morally wrong to search for God 's particle " ) that I would think sabotage to be a fairly plausible explanation for repeated failures .
But maybe that 's the tin foil hat speaking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long does this have to go on before people seriously start to suspect sabotage of the LHC?
The time travel theories are funny, but there are enough people vehemently opposed to the experiment ("Oh, no black holez will destroy teh worldz!
", "It is morally wrong to search for God's particle") that I would think sabotage to be a fairly plausible explanation for repeated failures.
But maybe that's the tin foil hat speaking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005558</id>
	<title>Idoits -</title>
	<author>ae1294</author>
	<datestamp>1257522420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is why I install <b>Turbo Lasers and Shielding</b> on all of my <b>fully operational</b> battle stations.</p><p>Your Master,<br>Emperor Palpatine</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why I install Turbo Lasers and Shielding on all of my fully operational battle stations.Your Master,Emperor Palpatine</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why I install Turbo Lasers and Shielding on all of my fully operational battle stations.Your Master,Emperor Palpatine</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004646</id>
	<title>LHC Success!</title>
	<author>kramulous</author>
	<datestamp>1257514740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is what they were searching for, isn't it.  This is it.  Particle detected!</p><p>And clearly it has a bitchin' sense of humour.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is what they were searching for , is n't it .
This is it .
Particle detected ! And clearly it has a bitchin ' sense of humour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is what they were searching for, isn't it.
This is it.
Particle detected!And clearly it has a bitchin' sense of humour.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006778</id>
	<title>Thanks be to God!  Especially because he exists.</title>
	<author>icannotthinkofaname</author>
	<datestamp>1257530220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been praying for the re-deactivation of this machine.</p><p>Obviously, the one true God, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, the God of Jacob, the Judeo-Christian God, exists and has heard my request for the good of humanity.</p><p>He won't let a few scientists kill the whole human race!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p><p>Meh, mod as you will.  I should be prepared to take a hit for what I just wrote.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been praying for the re-deactivation of this machine.Obviously , the one true God , the God of Abraham , the God of Isaac , the God of Jacob , the Judeo-Christian God , exists and has heard my request for the good of humanity.He wo n't let a few scientists kill the whole human race !
: DMeh , mod as you will .
I should be prepared to take a hit for what I just wrote .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been praying for the re-deactivation of this machine.Obviously, the one true God, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, the God of Jacob, the Judeo-Christian God, exists and has heard my request for the good of humanity.He won't let a few scientists kill the whole human race!
:DMeh, mod as you will.
I should be prepared to take a hit for what I just wrote.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005238</id>
	<title>"Womp Rats" is code for "minorities"</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1257520080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is no other fauna shown on his desert homeworld that is "about two meters"  Everything was much larger or much smaller, even in the remastered edition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no other fauna shown on his desert homeworld that is " about two meters " Everything was much larger or much smaller , even in the remastered edition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no other fauna shown on his desert homeworld that is "about two meters"  Everything was much larger or much smaller, even in the remastered edition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003846</id>
	<title>forty f'ing two</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257501240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>who would have thought that deep thought<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... aka LHC would have produced nothing more than a singular finite number rather than some grand unifying theory of LTUAE</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>who would have thought that deep thought ... aka LHC would have produced nothing more than a singular finite number rather than some grand unifying theory of LTUAE</tokentext>
<sentencetext>who would have thought that deep thought ... aka LHC would have produced nothing more than a singular finite number rather than some grand unifying theory of LTUAE</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005386</id>
	<title>Re:The temp rise in question</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1257521280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...anyone'd think they invented the internet or something...</p><p>Well, you might.  The rest of us know that they invented the Web.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; ...anyone 'd think they invented the internet or something...Well , you might .
The rest of us know that they invented the Web .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; ...anyone'd think they invented the internet or something...Well, you might.
The rest of us know that they invented the Web.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003832</id>
	<title>whats next - LHC shot by a moslin general?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257501060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>or worse?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/zombies</htmltext>
<tokenext>or worse ?
/zombies</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or worse?
/zombies</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004666</id>
	<title>A comprehensive system ???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257514980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The spokeswoman said: &ldquo;The collider extends over a very large area &ndash; you have to have a very comprehensive system to try to avoid problems of this kind. We&rsquo;re talking about a couple of days down time.&rdquo;"</p><p>A comprehensive system to stop birds from dropping peices of food on it?  The only thing I read mentioned was a fence around the thing.  But apparently a fence doesn't stop birds or people that might open up the windows on their airplane and throw food out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The spokeswoman said :    The collider extends over a very large area    you have to have a very comprehensive system to try to avoid problems of this kind .
We    re talking about a couple of days down time.    " A comprehensive system to stop birds from dropping peices of food on it ?
The only thing I read mentioned was a fence around the thing .
But apparently a fence does n't stop birds or people that might open up the windows on their airplane and throw food out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The spokeswoman said: “The collider extends over a very large area – you have to have a very comprehensive system to try to avoid problems of this kind.
We’re talking about a couple of days down time.”"A comprehensive system to stop birds from dropping peices of food on it?
The only thing I read mentioned was a fence around the thing.
But apparently a fence doesn't stop birds or people that might open up the windows on their airplane and throw food out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004742</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257516300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Prove the universe has intent and you prove God.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Prove the universe has intent and you prove God .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Prove the universe has intent and you prove God.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30008456</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>Ensign\_Expendable</author>
	<datestamp>1257539820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course the universe can tolerate a paradox.  Spock told us so in the last Star Trek movie!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course the universe can tolerate a paradox .
Spock told us so in the last Star Trek movie !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course the universe can tolerate a paradox.
Spock told us so in the last Star Trek movie!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005828</id>
	<title>Re:We've Thought of Everything. It's perfectly Saf</title>
	<author>Rary</author>
	<datestamp>1257524160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The Scientists have assured us that this thing is perfectly safe. But they didn't even anticipate debris falling into the cooling system? Somehow I'm not comforted by their brilliance.</p></div><p>From TFS: "...but the spike produced so much heat that had the beam been on, automatic failsafes would have shut down the machine."</p><p>In other words, they <i>did</i> anticipate this, and built in failsafes to address it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Scientists have assured us that this thing is perfectly safe .
But they did n't even anticipate debris falling into the cooling system ?
Somehow I 'm not comforted by their brilliance.From TFS : " ...but the spike produced so much heat that had the beam been on , automatic failsafes would have shut down the machine .
" In other words , they did anticipate this , and built in failsafes to address it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Scientists have assured us that this thing is perfectly safe.
But they didn't even anticipate debris falling into the cooling system?
Somehow I'm not comforted by their brilliance.From TFS: "...but the spike produced so much heat that had the beam been on, automatic failsafes would have shut down the machine.
"In other words, they did anticipate this, and built in failsafes to address it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004676</id>
	<title>Re:Put a roof over it or something?</title>
	<author>cbope</author>
	<datestamp>1257515160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well for one thing, the LHC is not analogous to power station gear, and secondly even if you put a tin roof over something what's to stop birds from flying under the tin roof? Ever seen a bird indoors?</p><p>When you build something as big and complex as the LHC, there are bound to be issues like this that you just can't predict beforehand or prevent completely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well for one thing , the LHC is not analogous to power station gear , and secondly even if you put a tin roof over something what 's to stop birds from flying under the tin roof ?
Ever seen a bird indoors ? When you build something as big and complex as the LHC , there are bound to be issues like this that you just ca n't predict beforehand or prevent completely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well for one thing, the LHC is not analogous to power station gear, and secondly even if you put a tin roof over something what's to stop birds from flying under the tin roof?
Ever seen a bird indoors?When you build something as big and complex as the LHC, there are bound to be issues like this that you just can't predict beforehand or prevent completely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30013010</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>HydroPhonic</author>
	<datestamp>1257584640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ahhh.... the Infinite Implausibility Torpedo...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahhh.... the Infinite Implausibility Torpedo.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahhh.... the Infinite Implausibility Torpedo...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007396</id>
	<title>Re:LHC not actually shut down</title>
	<author>greyhueofdoubt</author>
	<datestamp>1257534000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It would mean at most a day or two of no beam before things got started again.</p></div><p>No beam today. Beam tomorrow. There's always a beam tomorrow...</p><p>-b</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would mean at most a day or two of no beam before things got started again.No beam today .
Beam tomorrow .
There 's always a beam tomorrow...-b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would mean at most a day or two of no beam before things got started again.No beam today.
Beam tomorrow.
There's always a beam tomorrow...-b
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006230</id>
	<title>Re:Bird briefing...</title>
	<author>Nadaka</author>
	<datestamp>1257526920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is exactly the first thing I thought as well.</p><p>Hell, both the deathstar and the LHC even are the largest and most powerful beam weapons of their respective cultures.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is exactly the first thing I thought as well.Hell , both the deathstar and the LHC even are the largest and most powerful beam weapons of their respective cultures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is exactly the first thing I thought as well.Hell, both the deathstar and the LHC even are the largest and most powerful beam weapons of their respective cultures.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006966</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1257531540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>this theory has actually been proposed: That activating the LHC would actually destroy the universe, that is, the whole universe, even reaching back into the past. That would mean that the only possible universes are ones in which the LHC is never activated, which means that if we keep trying, implausible events will continue to occur, preventing the LHC from activating- after all, we're here now, right. That's \_proof\_ that the LHC will never be activated!</i></p><p>Still think that's retarded.  First, yes we're here now, but why must that be so?  Why can't we all vanish in a puff of logic when the LHC comes on, if that's the fate of any universe in which it happens?  Don't give me the quantum suicide nonsense -- yes if you're here to comment on your survival of the suicide experiment, you're in one of the lucky universes.  But in many other universes, you died and are dead.  Why can't this universe be one of them?</p><p>Second, when the theoretical potential for paradoxes appears, the universe doesn't prevent them through a series of implausible events that have absolutely nothing to do with the paradox in question.  It prevents them via them being physically impossible.  E.g. faster than light travel allows backwards time travel and thus time paradoxes.  But faster than light travel is (as far as we can tell) impossible.  You can't make an FTL drive that then mysteriously fails every time you try to turn it on -- you just can't build an FTL drive in the first place!  If the LHC detecting a Higgs Boson results in a universe-ending paradox, then the most logic outcome is that the LHC simply won't be able to detect them.</p><p>Third, I'm not seeing what the difference between direct and indirect detection is here.  Right now, the Higgs is just theory, but if it <i>does</i> exist, then they're <i>everywhere</i> and we're indirectly observing its existence every time we interact with a particle that has mass.  Why is saying "Oh hey, our detectors found one!" materially different?  Why does "the universe" care that we can validate our theory?</p><p>Which leads right into the Fourth, which is I'm still not seeing the theoretical basis for a Higgs-based parodox.  It seems more like reverse engineering -- the LHC is busted, ergo the Higgs might cause paradoxes (which means birds drop baguettes into machinery?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this theory has actually been proposed : That activating the LHC would actually destroy the universe , that is , the whole universe , even reaching back into the past .
That would mean that the only possible universes are ones in which the LHC is never activated , which means that if we keep trying , implausible events will continue to occur , preventing the LHC from activating- after all , we 're here now , right .
That 's \ _proof \ _ that the LHC will never be activated ! Still think that 's retarded .
First , yes we 're here now , but why must that be so ?
Why ca n't we all vanish in a puff of logic when the LHC comes on , if that 's the fate of any universe in which it happens ?
Do n't give me the quantum suicide nonsense -- yes if you 're here to comment on your survival of the suicide experiment , you 're in one of the lucky universes .
But in many other universes , you died and are dead .
Why ca n't this universe be one of them ? Second , when the theoretical potential for paradoxes appears , the universe does n't prevent them through a series of implausible events that have absolutely nothing to do with the paradox in question .
It prevents them via them being physically impossible .
E.g. faster than light travel allows backwards time travel and thus time paradoxes .
But faster than light travel is ( as far as we can tell ) impossible .
You ca n't make an FTL drive that then mysteriously fails every time you try to turn it on -- you just ca n't build an FTL drive in the first place !
If the LHC detecting a Higgs Boson results in a universe-ending paradox , then the most logic outcome is that the LHC simply wo n't be able to detect them.Third , I 'm not seeing what the difference between direct and indirect detection is here .
Right now , the Higgs is just theory , but if it does exist , then they 're everywhere and we 're indirectly observing its existence every time we interact with a particle that has mass .
Why is saying " Oh hey , our detectors found one !
" materially different ?
Why does " the universe " care that we can validate our theory ? Which leads right into the Fourth , which is I 'm still not seeing the theoretical basis for a Higgs-based parodox .
It seems more like reverse engineering -- the LHC is busted , ergo the Higgs might cause paradoxes ( which means birds drop baguettes into machinery ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this theory has actually been proposed: That activating the LHC would actually destroy the universe, that is, the whole universe, even reaching back into the past.
That would mean that the only possible universes are ones in which the LHC is never activated, which means that if we keep trying, implausible events will continue to occur, preventing the LHC from activating- after all, we're here now, right.
That's \_proof\_ that the LHC will never be activated!Still think that's retarded.
First, yes we're here now, but why must that be so?
Why can't we all vanish in a puff of logic when the LHC comes on, if that's the fate of any universe in which it happens?
Don't give me the quantum suicide nonsense -- yes if you're here to comment on your survival of the suicide experiment, you're in one of the lucky universes.
But in many other universes, you died and are dead.
Why can't this universe be one of them?Second, when the theoretical potential for paradoxes appears, the universe doesn't prevent them through a series of implausible events that have absolutely nothing to do with the paradox in question.
It prevents them via them being physically impossible.
E.g. faster than light travel allows backwards time travel and thus time paradoxes.
But faster than light travel is (as far as we can tell) impossible.
You can't make an FTL drive that then mysteriously fails every time you try to turn it on -- you just can't build an FTL drive in the first place!
If the LHC detecting a Higgs Boson results in a universe-ending paradox, then the most logic outcome is that the LHC simply won't be able to detect them.Third, I'm not seeing what the difference between direct and indirect detection is here.
Right now, the Higgs is just theory, but if it does exist, then they're everywhere and we're indirectly observing its existence every time we interact with a particle that has mass.
Why is saying "Oh hey, our detectors found one!
" materially different?
Why does "the universe" care that we can validate our theory?Which leads right into the Fourth, which is I'm still not seeing the theoretical basis for a Higgs-based parodox.
It seems more like reverse engineering -- the LHC is busted, ergo the Higgs might cause paradoxes (which means birds drop baguettes into machinery?
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005976</id>
	<title>was that "bread baguette" from McDonalds?</title>
	<author>HollyMolly-1122</author>
	<datestamp>1257525180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>What was "the bird" preference this time ?
Most funny reason ever heard with high-tech device failing.
Is it operated at some fish market or still many feets below surface ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What was " the bird " preference this time ?
Most funny reason ever heard with high-tech device failing .
Is it operated at some fish market or still many feets below surface ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What was "the bird" preference this time ?
Most funny reason ever heard with high-tech device failing.
Is it operated at some fish market or still many feets below surface ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009766</id>
	<title>BS, smells like...</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1257502140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I say this smells a lot like BS on their part, it would be easier to just lie about a passing bird flying over and dropping something, even though I have never seen a bird fly over top of something that would be such a big noise generator, and also even try traveling with something in their mouths that they so want to eat, they would avoid that like the plague.,....but who am I to talk about this, god knows the people in charge of this project would own up to some miscalculation no their part should they be given the chance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I say this smells a lot like BS on their part , it would be easier to just lie about a passing bird flying over and dropping something , even though I have never seen a bird fly over top of something that would be such a big noise generator , and also even try traveling with something in their mouths that they so want to eat , they would avoid that like the plague.,....but who am I to talk about this , god knows the people in charge of this project would own up to some miscalculation no their part should they be given the chance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I say this smells a lot like BS on their part, it would be easier to just lie about a passing bird flying over and dropping something, even though I have never seen a bird fly over top of something that would be such a big noise generator, and also even try traveling with something in their mouths that they so want to eat, they would avoid that like the plague.,....but who am I to talk about this, god knows the people in charge of this project would own up to some miscalculation no their part should they be given the chance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007642</id>
	<title>Again, Murphy is God</title>
	<author>jbengt</author>
	<datestamp>1257535560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just one more piece of evidence that the God particle is the Murphy particle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just one more piece of evidence that the God particle is the Murphy particle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just one more piece of evidence that the God particle is the Murphy particle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30012536</id>
	<title>An appropriate expression</title>
	<author>bar-agent</author>
	<datestamp>1257530700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action."</p><p>If the LHC fails a third time, I'm going with the quantum suicide theory.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Once is happenstance , twice is coincidence , three times is enemy action .
" If the LHC fails a third time , I 'm going with the quantum suicide theory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action.
"If the LHC fails a third time, I'm going with the quantum suicide theory.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004010</id>
	<title>Obviously</title>
	<author>dandart</author>
	<datestamp>1257504180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obviously, because it causes such a universal disaster, it will throw us back in time, so we must make every attempt to stop it!

<br> <br>

And that was one of them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously , because it causes such a universal disaster , it will throw us back in time , so we must make every attempt to stop it !
And that was one of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously, because it causes such a universal disaster, it will throw us back in time, so we must make every attempt to stop it!
And that was one of them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007158</id>
	<title>Re:Bird briefing...</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1257532500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always wondered what those birds were doing when they swooped at me. The were just practicing using the force.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always wondered what those birds were doing when they swooped at me .
The were just practicing using the force .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always wondered what those birds were doing when they swooped at me.
The were just practicing using the force.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009228</id>
	<title>Re:A bird carrying a baguette - I think not!</title>
	<author>bigjarom</author>
	<datestamp>1257499860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Listen. In order to maintain air-speed velocity, a swallow needs to beat its wings forty-three times every second, right...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Listen .
In order to maintain air-speed velocity , a swallow needs to beat its wings forty-three times every second , right.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Listen.
In order to maintain air-speed velocity, a swallow needs to beat its wings forty-three times every second, right...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004196</id>
	<title>There's a saying</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257507300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Never attribute to a time traveling malicious Higgs boson what can easily be attributed to human stupidity."</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Physicists spend too much time in the lab in theoretical situations. It's amazing that when they design a machine that will go outside, they forget that birds tend to crap on everything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Never attribute to a time traveling malicious Higgs boson what can easily be attributed to human stupidity .
"       Physicists spend too much time in the lab in theoretical situations .
It 's amazing that when they design a machine that will go outside , they forget that birds tend to crap on everything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Never attribute to a time traveling malicious Higgs boson what can easily be attributed to human stupidity.
"
      Physicists spend too much time in the lab in theoretical situations.
It's amazing that when they design a machine that will go outside, they forget that birds tend to crap on everything.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004100</id>
	<title>It has nothing to do with time-travelling</title>
	<author>justkeeper</author>
	<datestamp>1257505680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>or parallel universe, it's just that their system was not designed with enough tolerance and redundancy, they should have expected their outdoor machinery being hitted by all kinds of things falling from the sky anyhow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>or parallel universe , it 's just that their system was not designed with enough tolerance and redundancy , they should have expected their outdoor machinery being hitted by all kinds of things falling from the sky anyhow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or parallel universe, it's just that their system was not designed with enough tolerance and redundancy, they should have expected their outdoor machinery being hitted by all kinds of things falling from the sky anyhow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004614</id>
	<title>Re:Confused</title>
	<author>Wonko the Sane</author>
	<datestamp>1257514260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Can any1 explain why it's a good idea to be messing around with a machine that 'might' produce teeny-tiny black holes that 'shouldn't' cause any problems?</p></div></blockquote><p>Because whatever this machine is capable of doing, even more is happening in the upper atmosphere all the time.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can any1 explain why it 's a good idea to be messing around with a machine that 'might ' produce teeny-tiny black holes that 'should n't ' cause any problems ? Because whatever this machine is capable of doing , even more is happening in the upper atmosphere all the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can any1 explain why it's a good idea to be messing around with a machine that 'might' produce teeny-tiny black holes that 'shouldn't' cause any problems?Because whatever this machine is capable of doing, even more is happening in the upper atmosphere all the time.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004340</id>
	<title>All the universes where the bread missed a busbar!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257510000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I too was pretty skeptical at first but now things are starting to get spooky.</p><p>Face it, the odds are really small that this would happen. It is more likely you have a scientist who is very worried about bad things happening, and who has actually intelligently sabotaged the system by trial and error, ending up with the old baguette-on-the-busbar trick which must be a physics joke among French speaking countries.</p><p>On the other hand, if the LHC is really a universe suicide machine then there must be an uncountable number of universes which died, due to the baguette hitting the wrong exterior portion of the LHC, etc.</p><p>Particle physics is one place where extremely big or small numbers are a matter of everyday discussion I expect. Unless a perpetrator is found soon (and boy I really hope one is), I doubt this will cause consternation among the public. Maybe if there are some smart people at LHC they may be freaking out now.</p><p>But consider what if the "running the LHC kills the Earth or maybe Everything" theory is true. First of all, almost all but a small fraction of all universes stemming from our many universes existing as of say a year ago must be extinguished by now, the odds of a bird with baguette causing a short-circuit being so small. If one more freaky incident occurs (as must happen according to the theory) then I think you will start seeing a lot of people freaking out and trying to stop the thing.</p><p>Also, if "LHC kills Earth" is true, and "there is a multiverse built like an ever branching tree" is true, then building the LHC is an act of pruning the tree and the number of universes in which you may potentially exist. In other words, there are way less alternate histories now, so existence for us is a lot less richer according to one way of looking at it (the number of multiverses). Another way of looking at that might be, is that it might become easier or harder to do things like quantum computing, or evolution, or scientific advancement toward a singularity, assuming that some connection among the multiverses, such as gravity, exists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I too was pretty skeptical at first but now things are starting to get spooky.Face it , the odds are really small that this would happen .
It is more likely you have a scientist who is very worried about bad things happening , and who has actually intelligently sabotaged the system by trial and error , ending up with the old baguette-on-the-busbar trick which must be a physics joke among French speaking countries.On the other hand , if the LHC is really a universe suicide machine then there must be an uncountable number of universes which died , due to the baguette hitting the wrong exterior portion of the LHC , etc.Particle physics is one place where extremely big or small numbers are a matter of everyday discussion I expect .
Unless a perpetrator is found soon ( and boy I really hope one is ) , I doubt this will cause consternation among the public .
Maybe if there are some smart people at LHC they may be freaking out now.But consider what if the " running the LHC kills the Earth or maybe Everything " theory is true .
First of all , almost all but a small fraction of all universes stemming from our many universes existing as of say a year ago must be extinguished by now , the odds of a bird with baguette causing a short-circuit being so small .
If one more freaky incident occurs ( as must happen according to the theory ) then I think you will start seeing a lot of people freaking out and trying to stop the thing.Also , if " LHC kills Earth " is true , and " there is a multiverse built like an ever branching tree " is true , then building the LHC is an act of pruning the tree and the number of universes in which you may potentially exist .
In other words , there are way less alternate histories now , so existence for us is a lot less richer according to one way of looking at it ( the number of multiverses ) .
Another way of looking at that might be , is that it might become easier or harder to do things like quantum computing , or evolution , or scientific advancement toward a singularity , assuming that some connection among the multiverses , such as gravity , exists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I too was pretty skeptical at first but now things are starting to get spooky.Face it, the odds are really small that this would happen.
It is more likely you have a scientist who is very worried about bad things happening, and who has actually intelligently sabotaged the system by trial and error, ending up with the old baguette-on-the-busbar trick which must be a physics joke among French speaking countries.On the other hand, if the LHC is really a universe suicide machine then there must be an uncountable number of universes which died, due to the baguette hitting the wrong exterior portion of the LHC, etc.Particle physics is one place where extremely big or small numbers are a matter of everyday discussion I expect.
Unless a perpetrator is found soon (and boy I really hope one is), I doubt this will cause consternation among the public.
Maybe if there are some smart people at LHC they may be freaking out now.But consider what if the "running the LHC kills the Earth or maybe Everything" theory is true.
First of all, almost all but a small fraction of all universes stemming from our many universes existing as of say a year ago must be extinguished by now, the odds of a bird with baguette causing a short-circuit being so small.
If one more freaky incident occurs (as must happen according to the theory) then I think you will start seeing a lot of people freaking out and trying to stop the thing.Also, if "LHC kills Earth" is true, and "there is a multiverse built like an ever branching tree" is true, then building the LHC is an act of pruning the tree and the number of universes in which you may potentially exist.
In other words, there are way less alternate histories now, so existence for us is a lot less richer according to one way of looking at it (the number of multiverses).
Another way of looking at that might be, is that it might become easier or harder to do things like quantum computing, or evolution, or scientific advancement toward a singularity, assuming that some connection among the multiverses, such as gravity, exists.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004200</id>
	<title>The Collider, the Particle and a Theory About Fate</title>
	<author>piepkraak</author>
	<datestamp>1257507360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Collider, the Particle and a Theory About Fate</p><p>-The New York Times</p><p>Then it will be time to test one of the most bizarre and revolutionary theories in science. I&rsquo;m not talking about extra dimensions of space-time, dark matter or even black holes that eat the Earth. No, I&rsquo;m talking about the notion that the troubled collider is being sabotaged by its own future. A pair of otherwise distinguished physicists have suggested that the hypothesized Higgs boson, which physicists hope to produce with the collider, might be so abhorrent to nature that its creation would ripple backward through time and stop the collider before it could make one, like a time traveler who goes back in time to kill his grandfather.</p><p>Holger Bech Nielsen, of the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, and Masao Ninomiya of the Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics in Kyoto, Japan, put this idea forward in a series of papers with titles like &ldquo;Test of Effect From Future in Large Hadron Collider: a Proposal&rdquo; and &ldquo;Search for Future Influence From LHC,&rdquo; posted on the physics Web site arXiv.org in the last year and a half.<br>According to the so-called Standard Model that rules almost all physics, the Higgs is responsible for imbuing other elementary particles with mass.</p><p>&ldquo;It must be our prediction that all Higgs producing machines shall have bad luck,&rdquo; Dr. Nielsen said in an e-mail message. In an unpublished essay, Dr. Nielson said of the theory,&ldquo;Well, one could even almost say that we have a model for God.&rdquo; It is their guess, he went on, &ldquo;that He rather hates Higgs particles, and attempts to avoid them.&rdquo;</p><p>This malign influence from the future, they argue, could explain why the United States Superconducting Supercollider, also designed to find the Higgs, was canceled in 1993 after billions of dollars had already been spent, an event so unlikely that Dr. Nielsen calls it an &ldquo;anti-miracle.&rdquo;</p><p>You might think that the appearance of this theory is further proof that people have had ample time &mdash; perhaps too much time &mdash; to think about what will come out of the collider, which has been 15 years and $9 billion in the making.<br>The collider was built by CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, to accelerate protons to energies of seven trillion electron volts around an 18-mile underground racetrack and then crash them together into primordial fireballs.</p><p>For the record, as of the middle of September, CERN engineers hope to begin to collide protons at the so-called injection energy of 450 billion electron volts in December and then ramp up the energy until the protons have 3.5 trillion electron volts of energy apiece and then, after a short Christmas break, real physics can begin.<br>Maybe.</p><p>Dr. Nielsen and Dr. Ninomiya started laying out their case for doom in the spring of 2008. It was later that fall, of course, after the CERN collider was turned on, that a connection between two magnets vaporized, shutting down the collider for more than a year.<br>Dr. Nielsen called that &ldquo;a funny thing that could make us to believe in the theory of ours.&rdquo;<br>He agreed that skepticism would be in order. After all, most big science projects, including the Hubble Space Telescope, have gone through a period of seeming jinxed. At CERN, the beat goes on: Last weekend the French police arrested a particle physicist who works on one of the collider experiments, on suspicion of conspiracy with a North African wing of Al Qaeda.</p><p>Dr. Nielsen and Dr. Ninomiya have proposed a kind of test: that CERN engage in a game of chance, a &ldquo;card-drawing&rdquo; exercise using perhaps a random-number generator, in order to discern bad luck from the future. If the outcome was sufficiently unlikely, say drawing the one spade in a deck with 100 million hearts, the machine would either not run at all, or only at low energies unlikely to find the Higgs.<br>Sure, it&rsquo;s crazy, and CERN should not and is not about to mortgage its i</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Collider , the Particle and a Theory About Fate-The New York TimesThen it will be time to test one of the most bizarre and revolutionary theories in science .
I    m not talking about extra dimensions of space-time , dark matter or even black holes that eat the Earth .
No , I    m talking about the notion that the troubled collider is being sabotaged by its own future .
A pair of otherwise distinguished physicists have suggested that the hypothesized Higgs boson , which physicists hope to produce with the collider , might be so abhorrent to nature that its creation would ripple backward through time and stop the collider before it could make one , like a time traveler who goes back in time to kill his grandfather.Holger Bech Nielsen , of the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen , and Masao Ninomiya of the Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics in Kyoto , Japan , put this idea forward in a series of papers with titles like    Test of Effect From Future in Large Hadron Collider : a Proposal    and    Search for Future Influence From LHC ,    posted on the physics Web site arXiv.org in the last year and a half.According to the so-called Standard Model that rules almost all physics , the Higgs is responsible for imbuing other elementary particles with mass.    It must be our prediction that all Higgs producing machines shall have bad luck ,    Dr. Nielsen said in an e-mail message .
In an unpublished essay , Dr. Nielson said of the theory ,    Well , one could even almost say that we have a model for God.    It is their guess , he went on ,    that He rather hates Higgs particles , and attempts to avoid them.    This malign influence from the future , they argue , could explain why the United States Superconducting Supercollider , also designed to find the Higgs , was canceled in 1993 after billions of dollars had already been spent , an event so unlikely that Dr. Nielsen calls it an    anti-miracle.    You might think that the appearance of this theory is further proof that people have had ample time    perhaps too much time    to think about what will come out of the collider , which has been 15 years and $ 9 billion in the making.The collider was built by CERN , the European Organization for Nuclear Research , to accelerate protons to energies of seven trillion electron volts around an 18-mile underground racetrack and then crash them together into primordial fireballs.For the record , as of the middle of September , CERN engineers hope to begin to collide protons at the so-called injection energy of 450 billion electron volts in December and then ramp up the energy until the protons have 3.5 trillion electron volts of energy apiece and then , after a short Christmas break , real physics can begin.Maybe.Dr .
Nielsen and Dr. Ninomiya started laying out their case for doom in the spring of 2008 .
It was later that fall , of course , after the CERN collider was turned on , that a connection between two magnets vaporized , shutting down the collider for more than a year.Dr .
Nielsen called that    a funny thing that could make us to believe in the theory of ours.    He agreed that skepticism would be in order .
After all , most big science projects , including the Hubble Space Telescope , have gone through a period of seeming jinxed .
At CERN , the beat goes on : Last weekend the French police arrested a particle physicist who works on one of the collider experiments , on suspicion of conspiracy with a North African wing of Al Qaeda.Dr .
Nielsen and Dr. Ninomiya have proposed a kind of test : that CERN engage in a game of chance , a    card-drawing    exercise using perhaps a random-number generator , in order to discern bad luck from the future .
If the outcome was sufficiently unlikely , say drawing the one spade in a deck with 100 million hearts , the machine would either not run at all , or only at low energies unlikely to find the Higgs.Sure , it    s crazy , and CERN should not and is not about to mortgage its i</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Collider, the Particle and a Theory About Fate-The New York TimesThen it will be time to test one of the most bizarre and revolutionary theories in science.
I’m not talking about extra dimensions of space-time, dark matter or even black holes that eat the Earth.
No, I’m talking about the notion that the troubled collider is being sabotaged by its own future.
A pair of otherwise distinguished physicists have suggested that the hypothesized Higgs boson, which physicists hope to produce with the collider, might be so abhorrent to nature that its creation would ripple backward through time and stop the collider before it could make one, like a time traveler who goes back in time to kill his grandfather.Holger Bech Nielsen, of the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, and Masao Ninomiya of the Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics in Kyoto, Japan, put this idea forward in a series of papers with titles like “Test of Effect From Future in Large Hadron Collider: a Proposal” and “Search for Future Influence From LHC,” posted on the physics Web site arXiv.org in the last year and a half.According to the so-called Standard Model that rules almost all physics, the Higgs is responsible for imbuing other elementary particles with mass.“It must be our prediction that all Higgs producing machines shall have bad luck,” Dr. Nielsen said in an e-mail message.
In an unpublished essay, Dr. Nielson said of the theory,“Well, one could even almost say that we have a model for God.” It is their guess, he went on, “that He rather hates Higgs particles, and attempts to avoid them.”This malign influence from the future, they argue, could explain why the United States Superconducting Supercollider, also designed to find the Higgs, was canceled in 1993 after billions of dollars had already been spent, an event so unlikely that Dr. Nielsen calls it an “anti-miracle.”You might think that the appearance of this theory is further proof that people have had ample time — perhaps too much time — to think about what will come out of the collider, which has been 15 years and $9 billion in the making.The collider was built by CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, to accelerate protons to energies of seven trillion electron volts around an 18-mile underground racetrack and then crash them together into primordial fireballs.For the record, as of the middle of September, CERN engineers hope to begin to collide protons at the so-called injection energy of 450 billion electron volts in December and then ramp up the energy until the protons have 3.5 trillion electron volts of energy apiece and then, after a short Christmas break, real physics can begin.Maybe.Dr.
Nielsen and Dr. Ninomiya started laying out their case for doom in the spring of 2008.
It was later that fall, of course, after the CERN collider was turned on, that a connection between two magnets vaporized, shutting down the collider for more than a year.Dr.
Nielsen called that “a funny thing that could make us to believe in the theory of ours.”He agreed that skepticism would be in order.
After all, most big science projects, including the Hubble Space Telescope, have gone through a period of seeming jinxed.
At CERN, the beat goes on: Last weekend the French police arrested a particle physicist who works on one of the collider experiments, on suspicion of conspiracy with a North African wing of Al Qaeda.Dr.
Nielsen and Dr. Ninomiya have proposed a kind of test: that CERN engage in a game of chance, a “card-drawing” exercise using perhaps a random-number generator, in order to discern bad luck from the future.
If the outcome was sufficiently unlikely, say drawing the one spade in a deck with 100 million hearts, the machine would either not run at all, or only at low energies unlikely to find the Higgs.Sure, it’s crazy, and CERN should not and is not about to mortgage its i</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898</id>
	<title>Put a roof over it or something?</title>
	<author>Ashtead</author>
	<datestamp>1257501960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One wonders how much it would take to put some kind of roofing over the most vulnerable exterior equipment.  Something like corrugated tin on a steel frame or whatever.

</p><p>Or maybe a roof over the cafeteria and the rubbish bins, so that birds can't just come and steal baguettes.

</p><p>I've never heard of such deleterious effects of a bird dropping anything on outdoor power station switchgear<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... what kind of vulnerable kit is this anyways?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One wonders how much it would take to put some kind of roofing over the most vulnerable exterior equipment .
Something like corrugated tin on a steel frame or whatever .
Or maybe a roof over the cafeteria and the rubbish bins , so that birds ca n't just come and steal baguettes .
I 've never heard of such deleterious effects of a bird dropping anything on outdoor power station switchgear ... what kind of vulnerable kit is this anyways ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One wonders how much it would take to put some kind of roofing over the most vulnerable exterior equipment.
Something like corrugated tin on a steel frame or whatever.
Or maybe a roof over the cafeteria and the rubbish bins, so that birds can't just come and steal baguettes.
I've never heard of such deleterious effects of a bird dropping anything on outdoor power station switchgear ... what kind of vulnerable kit is this anyways?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005832</id>
	<title>Exhaust port</title>
	<author>BlackSnake112</author>
	<datestamp>1257524160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this is a scale model Death Star. Even has the same weakness.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this is a scale model Death Star .
Even has the same weakness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is a scale model Death Star.
Even has the same weakness.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003906</id>
	<title>This is a joke right?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257502140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Where's the humor tag? I kept looking for the Onion link or humor tag. I have a hard time believing this. It's gotta be joke.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where 's the humor tag ?
I kept looking for the Onion link or humor tag .
I have a hard time believing this .
It 's got ta be joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where's the humor tag?
I kept looking for the Onion link or humor tag.
I have a hard time believing this.
It's gotta be joke.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004224</id>
	<title>Just finished Watching Sex &amp; the City...</title>
	<author>freedom\_india</author>
	<datestamp>1257507720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...isn't a baguette a hand bag thingy?<br>Or did i understand it wrongly?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...is n't a baguette a hand bag thingy ? Or did i understand it wrongly ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...isn't a baguette a hand bag thingy?Or did i understand it wrongly?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004440</id>
	<title>Probability fuse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257511500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They need to install a probability fuse, this idea was proposed mor than 30 years ago and ould probably have saved them a lot of money.</p><p>http://books.google.co.nz/books?id=fduW6KHhWtQC&amp;pg=PA183&amp;lpg=PA183&amp;dq=probability+fuse&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=SuqBwj1b2r&amp;sig=XDDSAT0O-9f0KVL4xk6N5wWrGgo#v=onepage&amp;q=probability\%20fuse&amp;f=false</p><p>This is a link to the part of the very interesting book in which the idea of a probability fuse is first (to my knowledge) proposed. The theory is a bit iffy but if higgs bosons really do time travel then a probability fuse is an excellent and cost effective solution to the problems currently being experienced by the LHC team.</p><p>In case the short excerpt is not enough to explain the theory goes that time travel or any observation of time independent events may lead to loops in time which repeat until a stable state is achieved, much like loops in a computer program. The probability that a given time travel experiment will fail is usually higher than the probability that it will succeed. The probabilty that it will fail due to mechanical failure is usually significant. So after the countless iterations that time goes through before the paradoxes and disturbances caused by the experiment are resolved the stable state is usually hardware failure. A probability fuse is simply a part of the machine whaich has a significant but unpredictable chance of failing, and the failure of which results in the entire experiment failing. As with any fuse the trick with designing a probablility fuse is to build it such that the fuse can be easily and cheaply replaced and the result of the fuse failing doesnt damage any other equipment.</p><p>I wish they would just hire me and pay me the difference in cost between the fuse and the equipment that has failed because of their failure to use one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They need to install a probability fuse , this idea was proposed mor than 30 years ago and ould probably have saved them a lot of money.http : //books.google.co.nz/books ? id = fduW6KHhWtQC&amp;pg = PA183&amp;lpg = PA183&amp;dq = probability + fuse&amp;source = bl&amp;ots = SuqBwj1b2r&amp;sig = XDDSAT0O-9f0KVL4xk6N5wWrGgo # v = onepage&amp;q = probability \ % 20fuse&amp;f = falseThis is a link to the part of the very interesting book in which the idea of a probability fuse is first ( to my knowledge ) proposed .
The theory is a bit iffy but if higgs bosons really do time travel then a probability fuse is an excellent and cost effective solution to the problems currently being experienced by the LHC team.In case the short excerpt is not enough to explain the theory goes that time travel or any observation of time independent events may lead to loops in time which repeat until a stable state is achieved , much like loops in a computer program .
The probability that a given time travel experiment will fail is usually higher than the probability that it will succeed .
The probabilty that it will fail due to mechanical failure is usually significant .
So after the countless iterations that time goes through before the paradoxes and disturbances caused by the experiment are resolved the stable state is usually hardware failure .
A probability fuse is simply a part of the machine whaich has a significant but unpredictable chance of failing , and the failure of which results in the entire experiment failing .
As with any fuse the trick with designing a probablility fuse is to build it such that the fuse can be easily and cheaply replaced and the result of the fuse failing doesnt damage any other equipment.I wish they would just hire me and pay me the difference in cost between the fuse and the equipment that has failed because of their failure to use one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They need to install a probability fuse, this idea was proposed mor than 30 years ago and ould probably have saved them a lot of money.http://books.google.co.nz/books?id=fduW6KHhWtQC&amp;pg=PA183&amp;lpg=PA183&amp;dq=probability+fuse&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=SuqBwj1b2r&amp;sig=XDDSAT0O-9f0KVL4xk6N5wWrGgo#v=onepage&amp;q=probability\%20fuse&amp;f=falseThis is a link to the part of the very interesting book in which the idea of a probability fuse is first (to my knowledge) proposed.
The theory is a bit iffy but if higgs bosons really do time travel then a probability fuse is an excellent and cost effective solution to the problems currently being experienced by the LHC team.In case the short excerpt is not enough to explain the theory goes that time travel or any observation of time independent events may lead to loops in time which repeat until a stable state is achieved, much like loops in a computer program.
The probability that a given time travel experiment will fail is usually higher than the probability that it will succeed.
The probabilty that it will fail due to mechanical failure is usually significant.
So after the countless iterations that time goes through before the paradoxes and disturbances caused by the experiment are resolved the stable state is usually hardware failure.
A probability fuse is simply a part of the machine whaich has a significant but unpredictable chance of failing, and the failure of which results in the entire experiment failing.
As with any fuse the trick with designing a probablility fuse is to build it such that the fuse can be easily and cheaply replaced and the result of the fuse failing doesnt damage any other equipment.I wish they would just hire me and pay me the difference in cost between the fuse and the equipment that has failed because of their failure to use one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004976</id>
	<title>Comment from the original article -</title>
	<author>Assmasher</author>
	<datestamp>1257518220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The approach will not be easy. You are required to maneuver straight down this trench and skim the surface to this point. The target area is only two meters wide. It's a small thermal exhaust port, right below the main port. The shaft leads directly to the reactor system. A precise hit will start a chain reaction which should destroy the station."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The approach will not be easy .
You are required to maneuver straight down this trench and skim the surface to this point .
The target area is only two meters wide .
It 's a small thermal exhaust port , right below the main port .
The shaft leads directly to the reactor system .
A precise hit will start a chain reaction which should destroy the station .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The approach will not be easy.
You are required to maneuver straight down this trench and skim the surface to this point.
The target area is only two meters wide.
It's a small thermal exhaust port, right below the main port.
The shaft leads directly to the reactor system.
A precise hit will start a chain reaction which should destroy the station.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005454</id>
	<title>We've Thought of Everything. It's perfectly Safe!</title>
	<author>thinktech</author>
	<datestamp>1257521640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Scientists have assured us that this thing is perfectly safe. But they didn't even anticipate debris falling into the cooling system? Somehow I'm not comforted by their brilliance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Scientists have assured us that this thing is perfectly safe .
But they did n't even anticipate debris falling into the cooling system ?
Somehow I 'm not comforted by their brilliance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Scientists have assured us that this thing is perfectly safe.
But they didn't even anticipate debris falling into the cooling system?
Somehow I'm not comforted by their brilliance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006374</id>
	<title>Higgs boson, not Higgs-Boson.</title>
	<author>mano.m</author>
	<datestamp>1257527760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'Higgs-Boson' sounds like a particle discovered by two people named Higgs and Boson, which is not the case.</p><p>The Higgs particle was predicted by Higgs, amongst others, in '64. Its statistical behaviour classifies it as a boson (i.e., a particle that follows Bose-Einstein statistics), which are named after Bose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'Higgs-Boson ' sounds like a particle discovered by two people named Higgs and Boson , which is not the case.The Higgs particle was predicted by Higgs , amongst others , in '64 .
Its statistical behaviour classifies it as a boson ( i.e. , a particle that follows Bose-Einstein statistics ) , which are named after Bose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Higgs-Boson' sounds like a particle discovered by two people named Higgs and Boson, which is not the case.The Higgs particle was predicted by Higgs, amongst others, in '64.
Its statistical behaviour classifies it as a boson (i.e., a particle that follows Bose-Einstein statistics), which are named after Bose.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005958</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257525060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not just have a website?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not just have a website ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not just have a website?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007116</id>
	<title>had it wrong all along...</title>
	<author>recharged95</author>
	<datestamp>1257532260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>information <i>doesn't</i> want to be free. LHC (and birds) proves it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>information does n't want to be free .
LHC ( and birds ) proves it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>information doesn't want to be free.
LHC (and birds) proves it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004408</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>h4rm0ny</author>
	<datestamp>1257510960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><br>
It also answers the Fermi Paradox (why in an enormous Universe that's been around for a very long time, we've yet to see signs of Intelligent Life) - sufficiently advanced species are improbable because its still more probable than a sufficiently advanced species that doesn't collapse it's existence due to creating Higgs Particles. To paraphrase Donnie Darko, every advanced civilisation, lives alone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It also answers the Fermi Paradox ( why in an enormous Universe that 's been around for a very long time , we 've yet to see signs of Intelligent Life ) - sufficiently advanced species are improbable because its still more probable than a sufficiently advanced species that does n't collapse it 's existence due to creating Higgs Particles .
To paraphrase Donnie Darko , every advanced civilisation , lives alone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
It also answers the Fermi Paradox (why in an enormous Universe that's been around for a very long time, we've yet to see signs of Intelligent Life) - sufficiently advanced species are improbable because its still more probable than a sufficiently advanced species that doesn't collapse it's existence due to creating Higgs Particles.
To paraphrase Donnie Darko, every advanced civilisation, lives alone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005544</id>
	<title>Re:Put a roof over it or something?</title>
	<author>Hasai</author>
	<datestamp>1257522360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've never heard of such deleterious effects of a bird dropping anything on outdoor power station switchgear<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... what kind of vulnerable kit is this anyways?</p></div><p>French.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never heard of such deleterious effects of a bird dropping anything on outdoor power station switchgear ... what kind of vulnerable kit is this anyways ? French .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never heard of such deleterious effects of a bird dropping anything on outdoor power station switchgear ... what kind of vulnerable kit is this anyways?French.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004154</id>
	<title>It's a sign from God..</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1257506400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This thing is going to blow up the world.  I see "Big Mistake of 38" all over this one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This thing is going to blow up the world .
I see " Big Mistake of 38 " all over this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This thing is going to blow up the world.
I see "Big Mistake of 38" all over this one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005784</id>
	<title>Just lousy engineering</title>
	<author>Theovon</author>
	<datestamp>1257523800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyone wants to go on and on about some kind of metaphysical conspiracy by the universe to make sure the machine doesn't run.</p><p>But the very fact that dropping bread on an external part of the machine caused overheating is an undeniable indication of just lousy engineering.  Maybe they didn't anticipate bread, but there are countless things in nature that could have landed on that machine.  How about leaves or other pieces of plants?  Or how about a bird dies and lands on the machine?  Or just nests there?</p><p>All this spooky stuff is just a way for the engineers who fucked up to shift blame from themselves.  The fact is, they just didn't think things through and built it poorly.</p><p>Now, I'm not telling you I could have done a better job.  I've done more than my fair share of lousy engineering.  Looking back on it, the mistakes are due to everything from silly typos to a lack of foresight.  And that's actually a normal part of engineering.  You can't anticipate everything, so things evolve as reality impacts your design.  Lots of stupid mistakes are nevertheless understandable.</p><p>But my god, man up and admit that you didn't do it right!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone wants to go on and on about some kind of metaphysical conspiracy by the universe to make sure the machine does n't run.But the very fact that dropping bread on an external part of the machine caused overheating is an undeniable indication of just lousy engineering .
Maybe they did n't anticipate bread , but there are countless things in nature that could have landed on that machine .
How about leaves or other pieces of plants ?
Or how about a bird dies and lands on the machine ?
Or just nests there ? All this spooky stuff is just a way for the engineers who fucked up to shift blame from themselves .
The fact is , they just did n't think things through and built it poorly.Now , I 'm not telling you I could have done a better job .
I 've done more than my fair share of lousy engineering .
Looking back on it , the mistakes are due to everything from silly typos to a lack of foresight .
And that 's actually a normal part of engineering .
You ca n't anticipate everything , so things evolve as reality impacts your design .
Lots of stupid mistakes are nevertheless understandable.But my god , man up and admit that you did n't do it right !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone wants to go on and on about some kind of metaphysical conspiracy by the universe to make sure the machine doesn't run.But the very fact that dropping bread on an external part of the machine caused overheating is an undeniable indication of just lousy engineering.
Maybe they didn't anticipate bread, but there are countless things in nature that could have landed on that machine.
How about leaves or other pieces of plants?
Or how about a bird dies and lands on the machine?
Or just nests there?All this spooky stuff is just a way for the engineers who fucked up to shift blame from themselves.
The fact is, they just didn't think things through and built it poorly.Now, I'm not telling you I could have done a better job.
I've done more than my fair share of lousy engineering.
Looking back on it, the mistakes are due to everything from silly typos to a lack of foresight.
And that's actually a normal part of engineering.
You can't anticipate everything, so things evolve as reality impacts your design.
Lots of stupid mistakes are nevertheless understandable.But my god, man up and admit that you didn't do it right!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004140</id>
	<title>Was it a thermal exhaust port?</title>
	<author>JJJK</author>
	<datestamp>1257506160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And you thought the death star had stupid vulnerabilities...</htmltext>
<tokenext>And you thought the death star had stupid vulnerabilities.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And you thought the death star had stupid vulnerabilities...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005886</id>
	<title>Re:Put a roof over it or something?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257524460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One wonders how much it would take to put some kind of roofing over the most vulnerable exterior equipment.  Something like corrugated tin on a steel frame or whatever.</p><p>Or maybe a roof over the cafeteria and the rubbish bins, so that birds can't just come and steal baguettes.</p><p>I've never heard of such deleterious effects of a bird dropping anything on outdoor power station switchgear<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... what kind of vulnerable kit is this anyways?</p></div><p>Not that terribly uncommon. Used to work in the utility industry, there was this time when a wayward squirrel got into the substation high voltage buswork. You can imagine the rest....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One wonders how much it would take to put some kind of roofing over the most vulnerable exterior equipment .
Something like corrugated tin on a steel frame or whatever.Or maybe a roof over the cafeteria and the rubbish bins , so that birds ca n't just come and steal baguettes.I 've never heard of such deleterious effects of a bird dropping anything on outdoor power station switchgear ... what kind of vulnerable kit is this anyways ? Not that terribly uncommon .
Used to work in the utility industry , there was this time when a wayward squirrel got into the substation high voltage buswork .
You can imagine the rest... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One wonders how much it would take to put some kind of roofing over the most vulnerable exterior equipment.
Something like corrugated tin on a steel frame or whatever.Or maybe a roof over the cafeteria and the rubbish bins, so that birds can't just come and steal baguettes.I've never heard of such deleterious effects of a bird dropping anything on outdoor power station switchgear ... what kind of vulnerable kit is this anyways?Not that terribly uncommon.
Used to work in the utility industry, there was this time when a wayward squirrel got into the substation high voltage buswork.
You can imagine the rest....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007316</id>
	<title>Re:Put a roof over it or something?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257533460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A power transformer in France, I believe. So I guess EDF is to blame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A power transformer in France , I believe .
So I guess EDF is to blame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A power transformer in France, I believe.
So I guess EDF is to blame.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005554</id>
	<title>Re:Confused</title>
	<author>Dragonslicer</author>
	<datestamp>1257522360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Can any1 explain why it's a good idea to be messing around with a machine that 'might' produce teeny-tiny black holes that 'shouldn't' cause any problems?</p></div><p>Because a black hole with the mass of a carbon atom exerts exactly the same gravitational force on other particles as a normal carbon atom. You don't see normal carbon atoms causing the collapse of the galaxy, do you?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can any1 explain why it 's a good idea to be messing around with a machine that 'might ' produce teeny-tiny black holes that 'should n't ' cause any problems ? Because a black hole with the mass of a carbon atom exerts exactly the same gravitational force on other particles as a normal carbon atom .
You do n't see normal carbon atoms causing the collapse of the galaxy , do you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can any1 explain why it's a good idea to be messing around with a machine that 'might' produce teeny-tiny black holes that 'shouldn't' cause any problems?Because a black hole with the mass of a carbon atom exerts exactly the same gravitational force on other particles as a normal carbon atom.
You don't see normal carbon atoms causing the collapse of the galaxy, do you?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005728</id>
	<title>Design problems?</title>
	<author>bjdevil66</author>
	<datestamp>1257523440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If a smallish piece of bread can bring this thing to its knees, someone should've built this to be just a little more durable. Heck - space shuttles are as simple and durable as your average backyard rock when compared to this thing. "Don't cough on it. It might break..."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If a smallish piece of bread can bring this thing to its knees , someone should 've built this to be just a little more durable .
Heck - space shuttles are as simple and durable as your average backyard rock when compared to this thing .
" Do n't cough on it .
It might break... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a smallish piece of bread can bring this thing to its knees, someone should've built this to be just a little more durable.
Heck - space shuttles are as simple and durable as your average backyard rock when compared to this thing.
"Don't cough on it.
It might break..."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006774</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>Spykk</author>
	<datestamp>1257530220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Obviously we can't live in one of those universes, so a series of accidents, bizarre or mundane, probably take place until someone decides it's not worth the effort and the project is scrapped.</p></div><p>
This hypothesis has received a lot of press lately, but I don't think most people understand it very well. Parrellel universes destroying themselves won't make it any more likely that the project will be scrapped in ours. All of those freak accidents would have to have been fated to occur regardless in order for our universe to exist. Because of that it is just as likely that all the other parrellel universes create and use the LHC without destroying themselves and we fail on a fluke. Our fate to fail exists independantly of what happens to everyone else.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously we ca n't live in one of those universes , so a series of accidents , bizarre or mundane , probably take place until someone decides it 's not worth the effort and the project is scrapped .
This hypothesis has received a lot of press lately , but I do n't think most people understand it very well .
Parrellel universes destroying themselves wo n't make it any more likely that the project will be scrapped in ours .
All of those freak accidents would have to have been fated to occur regardless in order for our universe to exist .
Because of that it is just as likely that all the other parrellel universes create and use the LHC without destroying themselves and we fail on a fluke .
Our fate to fail exists independantly of what happens to everyone else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously we can't live in one of those universes, so a series of accidents, bizarre or mundane, probably take place until someone decides it's not worth the effort and the project is scrapped.
This hypothesis has received a lot of press lately, but I don't think most people understand it very well.
Parrellel universes destroying themselves won't make it any more likely that the project will be scrapped in ours.
All of those freak accidents would have to have been fated to occur regardless in order for our universe to exist.
Because of that it is just as likely that all the other parrellel universes create and use the LHC without destroying themselves and we fail on a fluke.
Our fate to fail exists independantly of what happens to everyone else.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005234</id>
	<title>Death Star</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257520080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And why, exactly, is an unshielded exhaust port such a stretch of the imagination?</p><p>"The more they complicate the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the drain" - Scotty</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And why , exactly , is an unshielded exhaust port such a stretch of the imagination ?
" The more they complicate the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the drain " - Scotty</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And why, exactly, is an unshielded exhaust port such a stretch of the imagination?
"The more they complicate the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the drain" - Scotty</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004106</id>
	<title>Re:Put a roof over it or something?</title>
	<author>ArsenneLupin</author>
	<datestamp>1257505740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>put some kind of roofing over the most vulnerable exterior equipment.</p></div><p>There <em>was</em> a roof over it... but unfortunately they forgot about the tunnel effect...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>put some kind of roofing over the most vulnerable exterior equipment.There was a roof over it... but unfortunately they forgot about the tunnel effect.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>put some kind of roofing over the most vulnerable exterior equipment.There was a roof over it... but unfortunately they forgot about the tunnel effect...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005382</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257521220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can't hypothosize that "They never existed". It doesn't make sense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't hypothosize that " They never existed " .
It does n't make sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't hypothosize that "They never existed".
It doesn't make sense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004188</id>
	<title>Bird, five minutes before this took place:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257506880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Red Five standing by..."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Red Five standing by... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Red Five standing by..."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006424</id>
	<title>Re:The temp rise in question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257528000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>thanks for that link, really nice.</p><p>also cool to see how it compares to the last three months:</p><p>http://hcc.web.cern.ch/HCC/cryo\_main/avg\_temp\_evolution.php?mode=3\_months</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>thanks for that link , really nice.also cool to see how it compares to the last three months : http : //hcc.web.cern.ch/HCC/cryo \ _main/avg \ _temp \ _evolution.php ? mode = 3 \ _months</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thanks for that link, really nice.also cool to see how it compares to the last three months:http://hcc.web.cern.ch/HCC/cryo\_main/avg\_temp\_evolution.php?mode=3\_months</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005838</id>
	<title>Re:Bird briefing...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257524220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It'd still need Alec Guiness's help.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'd still need Alec Guiness 's help .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'd still need Alec Guiness's help.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004216</id>
	<title>The temp rise in question</title>
	<author>ColaMan</author>
	<datestamp>1257507480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://hcc.web.cern.ch/hcc/cryo\_main/cryo\_main.php?region=Sector81" title="web.cern.ch">http://hcc.web.cern.ch/hcc/cryo\_main/cryo\_main.php?region=Sector81</a> [web.cern.ch]</p><p>Pretty wild to think that a rise up to 8 kelvin is a "serious overtemp event".</p><p>(And fancy CERN having all their engineering data online like that, open to everyone..... anyone'd think they invented the internet or something.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //hcc.web.cern.ch/hcc/cryo \ _main/cryo \ _main.php ? region = Sector81 [ web.cern.ch ] Pretty wild to think that a rise up to 8 kelvin is a " serious overtemp event " .
( And fancy CERN having all their engineering data online like that , open to everyone..... anyone 'd think they invented the internet or something .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://hcc.web.cern.ch/hcc/cryo\_main/cryo\_main.php?region=Sector81 [web.cern.ch]Pretty wild to think that a rise up to 8 kelvin is a "serious overtemp event".
(And fancy CERN having all their engineering data online like that, open to everyone..... anyone'd think they invented the internet or something.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007652</id>
	<title>Re:Impossible to operate?</title>
	<author>Ungrounded Lightning</author>
	<datestamp>1257535620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>A lot of things will drop on sections "of outdoor machinery". It seems that this LHC machine has been designed in such a way that will never get a chance to work.</i></p><p>They sure don't seem to have the concepts of "redundancy", "margins", and "checking the systems BEFORE you bring them up"</p><p>How DO you lose power to a cooler without noticing it until you need the cooling?  Don't they have instrumentation that would tell them it's off?</p><p>Data centers, for instance, tend to be sited at the intersection of two power grids (in addition to having backup generators and dual power feeds to the machines.)  How did they miss this on the cooling for the superconducting magnets?  Letting THAT fail, even by a few degrees, and you'd better have the magnet current off or you've got another BIG repair to do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of things will drop on sections " of outdoor machinery " .
It seems that this LHC machine has been designed in such a way that will never get a chance to work.They sure do n't seem to have the concepts of " redundancy " , " margins " , and " checking the systems BEFORE you bring them up " How DO you lose power to a cooler without noticing it until you need the cooling ?
Do n't they have instrumentation that would tell them it 's off ? Data centers , for instance , tend to be sited at the intersection of two power grids ( in addition to having backup generators and dual power feeds to the machines .
) How did they miss this on the cooling for the superconducting magnets ?
Letting THAT fail , even by a few degrees , and you 'd better have the magnet current off or you 've got another BIG repair to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of things will drop on sections "of outdoor machinery".
It seems that this LHC machine has been designed in such a way that will never get a chance to work.They sure don't seem to have the concepts of "redundancy", "margins", and "checking the systems BEFORE you bring them up"How DO you lose power to a cooler without noticing it until you need the cooling?
Don't they have instrumentation that would tell them it's off?Data centers, for instance, tend to be sited at the intersection of two power grids (in addition to having backup generators and dual power feeds to the machines.
)  How did they miss this on the cooling for the superconducting magnets?
Letting THAT fail, even by a few degrees, and you'd better have the magnet current off or you've got another BIG repair to do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006906</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>cathector</author>
	<datestamp>1257531060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.. let's weaponize the shit out of implausability !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.. let 's weaponize the shit out of implausability !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. let's weaponize the shit out of implausability !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009954</id>
	<title>Re:Could the bird be sent by God?</title>
	<author>md65536</author>
	<datestamp>1257502980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>God: Hey Rube!  Rube!  Come check this out.  I put this baguette here for a bird to take it and fly to that machinery over there and short circuit it and halt the activation of the LHC.  You know, just to mess with them a bit.</p><p>Rube: Ten bucks says that won't work!</p><p>God: Go bird!  Go bird!  Drop that shit!  Yes, yes!  AWWWWWWW YAH!  Pay up, beyotch!!!! -- Oh hey, watch me drop this pencil in Abe Lincoln's butt crack, heeheehee.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>God : Hey Rube !
Rube ! Come check this out .
I put this baguette here for a bird to take it and fly to that machinery over there and short circuit it and halt the activation of the LHC .
You know , just to mess with them a bit.Rube : Ten bucks says that wo n't work ! God : Go bird !
Go bird !
Drop that shit !
Yes , yes !
AWWWWWWW YAH !
Pay up , beyotch ! ! ! !
-- Oh hey , watch me drop this pencil in Abe Lincoln 's butt crack , heeheehee .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>God: Hey Rube!
Rube!  Come check this out.
I put this baguette here for a bird to take it and fly to that machinery over there and short circuit it and halt the activation of the LHC.
You know, just to mess with them a bit.Rube: Ten bucks says that won't work!God: Go bird!
Go bird!
Drop that shit!
Yes, yes!
AWWWWWWW YAH!
Pay up, beyotch!!!!
-- Oh hey, watch me drop this pencil in Abe Lincoln's butt crack, heeheehee.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007168</id>
	<title>Re:LHC not actually shut down</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1257532560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really?  They expect stupid shit like not covering vents and keeping animals out to break it on a regular basis?</p><p>They need to be replaced.  They've been following Microsoft's engineering principals a little too closely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
They expect stupid shit like not covering vents and keeping animals out to break it on a regular basis ? They need to be replaced .
They 've been following Microsoft 's engineering principals a little too closely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
They expect stupid shit like not covering vents and keeping animals out to break it on a regular basis?They need to be replaced.
They've been following Microsoft's engineering principals a little too closely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004044</id>
	<title>Re:Bird briefing...</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1257504600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pidgeo Pidgrissian: Yes, I said *closer*! Move as close as you can, and engage those super-conducting magnets at point blank range! <br>
Admiral Platypus: At that close range we won't last long against those particle beams! <br>
Pidgeo Pidgrissiann: We'll last longer than we will against that quantum suicide event! And we might just take it down with us!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pidgeo Pidgrissian : Yes , I said * closer * !
Move as close as you can , and engage those super-conducting magnets at point blank range !
Admiral Platypus : At that close range we wo n't last long against those particle beams !
Pidgeo Pidgrissiann : We 'll last longer than we will against that quantum suicide event !
And we might just take it down with us !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pidgeo Pidgrissian: Yes, I said *closer*!
Move as close as you can, and engage those super-conducting magnets at point blank range!
Admiral Platypus: At that close range we won't last long against those particle beams!
Pidgeo Pidgrissiann: We'll last longer than we will against that quantum suicide event!
And we might just take it down with us!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30014286</id>
	<title>Fire it up already</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1257609720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ffs. dont let birds or caterpillars stop you next time. geez.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ffs .
dont let birds or caterpillars stop you next time .
geez .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ffs.
dont let birds or caterpillars stop you next time.
geez.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30011166</id>
	<title>Re:Impossible to operate?</title>
	<author>straponego</author>
	<datestamp>1257510540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"A pretty comprehensive system..."<br><br>A roof?  Vents not open to the sky?  Filters?   It's not particle physics, people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" A pretty comprehensive system... " A roof ?
Vents not open to the sky ?
Filters ? It 's not particle physics , people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"A pretty comprehensive system..."A roof?
Vents not open to the sky?
Filters?   It's not particle physics, people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004714</id>
	<title>So long and thanks for all the bread...</title>
	<author>captainpanic</author>
	<datestamp>1257515700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So long and thanks for all the bread...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So long and thanks for all the bread.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So long and thanks for all the bread...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004700</id>
	<title>Bug in CERN's temperature stats for the magnet?</title>
	<author>TimFreeman</author>
	<datestamp>1257515340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As I write this, the charts about their magnet temperature are
contradictory.  The top one says the temperature of the warmest arc
magnet is back down to 2 Kelvins, but the lower right one says the
temperature of the warmest arc magnet is about 9.5 Kelvins.  It almost
makes sense if we assume that the numbers at the lower right are the
maximum value observed over the last few weeks, but the maximum in the
upper chart is around 8 Kelvins and the lower right chart says 9.5
Kelvins, so it's still not right.
<p>
The URL from The Register is: ht tp://hcc.web.cern.ch/hcc/cryo\_main/cryo\_main.php?region=Sector81
</p><p>
(I have no clue what an arc magnet is.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As I write this , the charts about their magnet temperature are contradictory .
The top one says the temperature of the warmest arc magnet is back down to 2 Kelvins , but the lower right one says the temperature of the warmest arc magnet is about 9.5 Kelvins .
It almost makes sense if we assume that the numbers at the lower right are the maximum value observed over the last few weeks , but the maximum in the upper chart is around 8 Kelvins and the lower right chart says 9.5 Kelvins , so it 's still not right .
The URL from The Register is : ht tp : //hcc.web.cern.ch/hcc/cryo \ _main/cryo \ _main.php ? region = Sector81 ( I have no clue what an arc magnet is .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I write this, the charts about their magnet temperature are
contradictory.
The top one says the temperature of the warmest arc
magnet is back down to 2 Kelvins, but the lower right one says the
temperature of the warmest arc magnet is about 9.5 Kelvins.
It almost
makes sense if we assume that the numbers at the lower right are the
maximum value observed over the last few weeks, but the maximum in the
upper chart is around 8 Kelvins and the lower right chart says 9.5
Kelvins, so it's still not right.
The URL from The Register is: ht tp://hcc.web.cern.ch/hcc/cryo\_main/cryo\_main.php?region=Sector81

(I have no clue what an arc magnet is.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004284</id>
	<title>Re:I hate you for that misleading headline!</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1257508800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It it opposite day again? Or what is the -1 Overrated for?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It it opposite day again ?
Or what is the -1 Overrated for ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It it opposite day again?
Or what is the -1 Overrated for?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004634</id>
	<title>Re:There's a saying</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257514680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Never attribute to a time traveling malicious Higgs boson what can easily be attributed to human stupidity."</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Physicists spend too much time in the lab in theoretical situations. It's amazing that when they design a machine that will go outside, they forget that birds tend to crap on everything.</p></div><p>You didn't read the article, did you?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Never attribute to a time traveling malicious Higgs boson what can easily be attributed to human stupidity .
"       Physicists spend too much time in the lab in theoretical situations .
It 's amazing that when they design a machine that will go outside , they forget that birds tend to crap on everything.You did n't read the article , did you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Never attribute to a time traveling malicious Higgs boson what can easily be attributed to human stupidity.
"
      Physicists spend too much time in the lab in theoretical situations.
It's amazing that when they design a machine that will go outside, they forget that birds tend to crap on everything.You didn't read the article, did you?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006766</id>
	<title>Re:Impossible to operate?</title>
	<author>KaimaraZatar</author>
	<datestamp>1257530220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> &ldquo;Nobody knows how it got there,&rdquo; she told The Times. &ldquo;The best guess is that it was dropped by a bird, either that or it was thrown out of a passing aeroplane.&rdquo;</p></div><p>Perhaps the bread came from La Dichosa Bakery.  This could be the opening shot of an expansionist campaign by the Conch Republic.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>   Nobody knows how it got there ,    she told The Times .
   The best guess is that it was dropped by a bird , either that or it was thrown out of a passing aeroplane.    Perhaps the bread came from La Dichosa Bakery .
This could be the opening shot of an expansionist campaign by the Conch Republic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> “Nobody knows how it got there,” she told The Times.
“The best guess is that it was dropped by a bird, either that or it was thrown out of a passing aeroplane.”Perhaps the bread came from La Dichosa Bakery.
This could be the opening shot of an expansionist campaign by the Conch Republic.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30013006</id>
	<title>sure it wasnt a giant moth?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257584640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mothra?!? It can't be birds?!?!?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mothra ? ! ?
It ca n't be birds ? ! ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mothra?!?
It can't be birds?!?!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004824</id>
	<title>Everyone should have one...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257517140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The LHC... the worlds most sophisticated toaster!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The LHC... the worlds most sophisticated toaster ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The LHC... the worlds most sophisticated toaster!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003890</id>
	<title>Bird briefing...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257501900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The bird's briefing:</p><p>The approach will not be easy. You are required to maneuver straight down this trench and skim the surface to this point. The target area is only two meters wide. It's a small thermal exhaust port, right below the main port. The shaft leads directly to the reactor system. A precise hit will start a chain reaction which should destroy the station.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The bird 's briefing : The approach will not be easy .
You are required to maneuver straight down this trench and skim the surface to this point .
The target area is only two meters wide .
It 's a small thermal exhaust port , right below the main port .
The shaft leads directly to the reactor system .
A precise hit will start a chain reaction which should destroy the station .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The bird's briefing:The approach will not be easy.
You are required to maneuver straight down this trench and skim the surface to this point.
The target area is only two meters wide.
It's a small thermal exhaust port, right below the main port.
The shaft leads directly to the reactor system.
A precise hit will start a chain reaction which should destroy the station.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006078</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>supersloshy</author>
	<datestamp>1257526020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>About the first hypothesis: What's making these accidents? It can't all be coincidence, could it? There's no other explanation than a non-secular one in this case; am I correct?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>About the first hypothesis : What 's making these accidents ?
It ca n't all be coincidence , could it ?
There 's no other explanation than a non-secular one in this case ; am I correct ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About the first hypothesis: What's making these accidents?
It can't all be coincidence, could it?
There's no other explanation than a non-secular one in this case; am I correct?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30012134</id>
	<title>I anyone at all concerned . . .</title>
	<author>w0rd</author>
	<datestamp>1257522660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> . . . that our best engineers have created something so potentially important, that is disabled by throwing #$\%ing bread on it?  really?  I mean, one baguette?  really?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.
. .
that our best engineers have created something so potentially important , that is disabled by throwing # $ \ % ing bread on it ?
really ? I mean , one baguette ?
really ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> .
. .
that our best engineers have created something so potentially important, that is disabled by throwing #$\%ing bread on it?
really?  I mean, one baguette?
really?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009126</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>Lord Bitman</author>
	<datestamp>1257499440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know how you got "the universe can't tolerate a paradox" from "universes which create higgs bosons don't exist because they are destroyed by that creation". Can you please describe something <em>more</em> paradoxical? Really I tend to think the whole idea is generally absurd because it requires a paradox - though personally I don't shy away from such things, at least for thought experiments.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know how you got " the universe ca n't tolerate a paradox " from " universes which create higgs bosons do n't exist because they are destroyed by that creation " .
Can you please describe something more paradoxical ?
Really I tend to think the whole idea is generally absurd because it requires a paradox - though personally I do n't shy away from such things , at least for thought experiments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know how you got "the universe can't tolerate a paradox" from "universes which create higgs bosons don't exist because they are destroyed by that creation".
Can you please describe something more paradoxical?
Really I tend to think the whole idea is generally absurd because it requires a paradox - though personally I don't shy away from such things, at least for thought experiments.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004630</id>
	<title>Deathstar</title>
	<author>flithm</author>
	<datestamp>1257514680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone else think this is strangely similar to the Deathstar?  Who builds multibillion dollar device that can be destroyed a bird and some bread?  Surely they might have thought to protect critical areas that can overheat?  No wonder the project hasn't been off to a good start.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else think this is strangely similar to the Deathstar ?
Who builds multibillion dollar device that can be destroyed a bird and some bread ?
Surely they might have thought to protect critical areas that can overheat ?
No wonder the project has n't been off to a good start .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else think this is strangely similar to the Deathstar?
Who builds multibillion dollar device that can be destroyed a bird and some bread?
Surely they might have thought to protect critical areas that can overheat?
No wonder the project hasn't been off to a good start.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005646</id>
	<title>higgs boson = God Particle: LHC = tower of babble?</title>
	<author>2obvious4u</author>
	<datestamp>1257522960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The time traveling particle and the way it is described reminds me of the story of the tower of babble.  Just saying...</htmltext>
<tokenext>The time traveling particle and the way it is described reminds me of the story of the tower of babble .
Just saying.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The time traveling particle and the way it is described reminds me of the story of the tower of babble.
Just saying...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005072</id>
	<title>Infinite Improbability Drive</title>
	<author>Überhund</author>
	<datestamp>1257518940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Engage!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Engage !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Engage!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009056</id>
	<title>Re:Impossible to operate?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257499080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a "normal" fault of this sort.  Birds (and often squirrels) get into substations easily, and can cause such a fault condition (essentially, a short).  There really isn't any practical way to guard against this completely either for LHC or your local substation...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a " normal " fault of this sort .
Birds ( and often squirrels ) get into substations easily , and can cause such a fault condition ( essentially , a short ) .
There really is n't any practical way to guard against this completely either for LHC or your local substation.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a "normal" fault of this sort.
Birds (and often squirrels) get into substations easily, and can cause such a fault condition (essentially, a short).
There really isn't any practical way to guard against this completely either for LHC or your local substation...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003996</id>
	<title>Confused</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257504000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can any1 explain why it's a good idea to be messing around with a machine that 'might' produce teeny-tiny black holes that 'shouldn't' cause any problems?</p><p>I'm just having a bit of trouble understanding why, exactly, this is anything but short-sighted and foolish..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can any1 explain why it 's a good idea to be messing around with a machine that 'might ' produce teeny-tiny black holes that 'should n't ' cause any problems ? I 'm just having a bit of trouble understanding why , exactly , this is anything but short-sighted and foolish. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can any1 explain why it's a good idea to be messing around with a machine that 'might' produce teeny-tiny black holes that 'shouldn't' cause any problems?I'm just having a bit of trouble understanding why, exactly, this is anything but short-sighted and foolish..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006006</id>
	<title>Why I love slashdot</title>
	<author>Slightly Askew</author>
	<datestamp>1257525480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The question of "water witching" to find bombs in Iraq comes back with 50\% of the respondants crying confirmation bias, but a few things go wrong on a project that most likely has tens of thousands of important components and everyone starts screaming time travel, balance of the universe, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The question of " water witching " to find bombs in Iraq comes back with 50 \ % of the respondants crying confirmation bias , but a few things go wrong on a project that most likely has tens of thousands of important components and everyone starts screaming time travel , balance of the universe , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The question of "water witching" to find bombs in Iraq comes back with 50\% of the respondants crying confirmation bias, but a few things go wrong on a project that most likely has tens of thousands of important components and everyone starts screaming time travel, balance of the universe, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004244</id>
	<title>Infinite Improbability Drive</title>
	<author>lastgoodnickname</author>
	<datestamp>1257508080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>nuff said</htmltext>
<tokenext>nuff said</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nuff said</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006108</id>
	<title>Re:This is a joke right?</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1257526140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you lived my wierd, strange life you'd believe almost any wierd coincidence. A bird dropping bread on a busbar isn't wierd at all. My dad is a retired electrical lineman, and says that most power outages are caused by squirrels trying to get warm in electrical transformers, and wind up getting a little too wam (bursting into flames warm).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you lived my wierd , strange life you 'd believe almost any wierd coincidence .
A bird dropping bread on a busbar is n't wierd at all .
My dad is a retired electrical lineman , and says that most power outages are caused by squirrels trying to get warm in electrical transformers , and wind up getting a little too wam ( bursting into flames warm ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you lived my wierd, strange life you'd believe almost any wierd coincidence.
A bird dropping bread on a busbar isn't wierd at all.
My dad is a retired electrical lineman, and says that most power outages are caused by squirrels trying to get warm in electrical transformers, and wind up getting a little too wam (bursting into flames warm).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257504060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this theory has actually been proposed: That activating the LHC would actually destroy the universe, that is, the whole universe, even reaching back into the past. That would mean that the only possible universes are ones in which the LHC is never activated, which means that if we keep trying, implausible events will continue to occur, preventing the LHC from activating- after all, we're here now, right. That's \_proof\_ that the LHC will never be activated!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this theory has actually been proposed : That activating the LHC would actually destroy the universe , that is , the whole universe , even reaching back into the past .
That would mean that the only possible universes are ones in which the LHC is never activated , which means that if we keep trying , implausible events will continue to occur , preventing the LHC from activating- after all , we 're here now , right .
That 's \ _proof \ _ that the LHC will never be activated !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this theory has actually been proposed: That activating the LHC would actually destroy the universe, that is, the whole universe, even reaching back into the past.
That would mean that the only possible universes are ones in which the LHC is never activated, which means that if we keep trying, implausible events will continue to occur, preventing the LHC from activating- after all, we're here now, right.
That's \_proof\_ that the LHC will never be activated!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006394</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm</title>
	<author>Velorium</author>
	<datestamp>1257527820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd say about ten (total).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd say about ten ( total ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd say about ten (total).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004150</id>
	<title>You go tell them that.</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1257506400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Hey, I have this great idea for solving your bird-baguette issues! It involves putting ferromagnetic joists over the top of your super-conducting magnets..."<br> <br>whatcouldpossiblygowrong</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Hey , I have this great idea for solving your bird-baguette issues !
It involves putting ferromagnetic joists over the top of your super-conducting magnets... " whatcouldpossiblygowrong</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Hey, I have this great idea for solving your bird-baguette issues!
It involves putting ferromagnetic joists over the top of your super-conducting magnets..." whatcouldpossiblygowrong</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004764</id>
	<title>CERN status web apps</title>
	<author>Johnno74</author>
	<datestamp>1257516540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The PopSci page links to a more detailed story on the register, which has a link to <a href="http://hcc.web.cern.ch/hcc/cryo\_main/cryo\_main.php?region=Sector81" title="web.cern.ch">this page</a> [web.cern.ch] which is a real-time temperature graph of the actual area involved.</p><p>Pretty damn cool IMHO that this data is live on the web.</p><p>The actual area where the overheating occoured is named  "Sector 81".</p><p>I wonder if they have headcrabs!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The PopSci page links to a more detailed story on the register , which has a link to this page [ web.cern.ch ] which is a real-time temperature graph of the actual area involved.Pretty damn cool IMHO that this data is live on the web.The actual area where the overheating occoured is named " Sector 81 " .I wonder if they have headcrabs !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The PopSci page links to a more detailed story on the register, which has a link to this page [web.cern.ch] which is a real-time temperature graph of the actual area involved.Pretty damn cool IMHO that this data is live on the web.The actual area where the overheating occoured is named  "Sector 81".I wonder if they have headcrabs!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004586</id>
	<title>Stop blaming the birds.</title>
	<author>tgd</author>
	<datestamp>1257513960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Blame the French.</p><p>They're the ones who came up with the baguette.</p><p>They're always causing problems... (the French, not the baguette. They're not evil, they're just baked that way.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Blame the French.They 're the ones who came up with the baguette.They 're always causing problems... ( the French , not the baguette .
They 're not evil , they 're just baked that way .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blame the French.They're the ones who came up with the baguette.They're always causing problems... (the French, not the baguette.
They're not evil, they're just baked that way.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004096</id>
	<title>LHC not actually shut down</title>
	<author>PaSTE</author>
	<datestamp>1257505680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The LHC is designed with very good fail-safes so that random events like this won't shut down the accelerator for huge amounts of time.  It would mean at most a day or two of no beam before things got started again.  These kinds of safety trips are to be expected a couple of times a month with a machine as huge and complicated as the LHC.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The LHC is designed with very good fail-safes so that random events like this wo n't shut down the accelerator for huge amounts of time .
It would mean at most a day or two of no beam before things got started again .
These kinds of safety trips are to be expected a couple of times a month with a machine as huge and complicated as the LHC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The LHC is designed with very good fail-safes so that random events like this won't shut down the accelerator for huge amounts of time.
It would mean at most a day or two of no beam before things got started again.
These kinds of safety trips are to be expected a couple of times a month with a machine as huge and complicated as the LHC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004026</id>
	<title>Hmm</title>
	<author>ShooterNeo</author>
	<datestamp>1257504300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just how many of these freak accidents in a row would be necessary to provide incontrovertible proof of the "universe doensn't want us to switch LHC on" theory?</p><p>I can imagine an objective demo : once we're sure that the principle exists, there would be a special room with a red button to turn on LHC.  Skeptics would be invited to attempt to press the button...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just how many of these freak accidents in a row would be necessary to provide incontrovertible proof of the " universe doens n't want us to switch LHC on " theory ? I can imagine an objective demo : once we 're sure that the principle exists , there would be a special room with a red button to turn on LHC .
Skeptics would be invited to attempt to press the button.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just how many of these freak accidents in a row would be necessary to provide incontrovertible proof of the "universe doensn't want us to switch LHC on" theory?I can imagine an objective demo : once we're sure that the principle exists, there would be a special room with a red button to turn on LHC.
Skeptics would be invited to attempt to press the button...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004494</id>
	<title>A bird carrying a baguette - I think not!</title>
	<author>PinkyDead</author>
	<datestamp>1257512400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Two African swallows with a piece of string between them... maybe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Two African swallows with a piece of string between them... maybe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two African swallows with a piece of string between them... maybe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007312</id>
	<title>Re:Confused</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257533400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Can any1 explain why it's a good idea to be messing around with a machine that 'might' produce teeny-tiny black holes that 'shouldn't' cause any problems?</p></div><p>Because a black hole with the mass of a carbon atom exerts exactly the same gravitational force on other particles as a normal carbon atom. You don't see normal carbon atoms causing the collapse of the galaxy, do you?</p></div><p>So let me get this straight -</p><p>When the teeny-tiny black hole collides with another carbon atom, it will absorb it right?  Because that's what black holes do.</p><p>So then it will have double the mass of a carbon atom...so it will have double the gravitational force of a carbon atom, which means that it will attract more carbon atoms....</p><p>Starting to see a REALLY troubling pattern here!!!!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can any1 explain why it 's a good idea to be messing around with a machine that 'might ' produce teeny-tiny black holes that 'should n't ' cause any problems ? Because a black hole with the mass of a carbon atom exerts exactly the same gravitational force on other particles as a normal carbon atom .
You do n't see normal carbon atoms causing the collapse of the galaxy , do you ? So let me get this straight -When the teeny-tiny black hole collides with another carbon atom , it will absorb it right ?
Because that 's what black holes do.So then it will have double the mass of a carbon atom...so it will have double the gravitational force of a carbon atom , which means that it will attract more carbon atoms....Starting to see a REALLY troubling pattern here ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can any1 explain why it's a good idea to be messing around with a machine that 'might' produce teeny-tiny black holes that 'shouldn't' cause any problems?Because a black hole with the mass of a carbon atom exerts exactly the same gravitational force on other particles as a normal carbon atom.
You don't see normal carbon atoms causing the collapse of the galaxy, do you?So let me get this straight -When the teeny-tiny black hole collides with another carbon atom, it will absorb it right?
Because that's what black holes do.So then it will have double the mass of a carbon atom...so it will have double the gravitational force of a carbon atom, which means that it will attract more carbon atoms....Starting to see a REALLY troubling pattern here!!!
!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006704</id>
	<title>Re:Just finished Watching Sex &amp; the City...</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1257529800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had no idea what a baguette was either so I looked it up in wikipedia. It's either a kind of French bread roll, or a decorative building cornice. Wikipedia said nothing about purses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had no idea what a baguette was either so I looked it up in wikipedia .
It 's either a kind of French bread roll , or a decorative building cornice .
Wikipedia said nothing about purses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had no idea what a baguette was either so I looked it up in wikipedia.
It's either a kind of French bread roll, or a decorative building cornice.
Wikipedia said nothing about purses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009686</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257501900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It is our mind, which cannot simultaneously reconcile to apparently contrary propositions.</p></div></blockquote><p>Clearly, you've never met my ex-wife.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is our mind , which can not simultaneously reconcile to apparently contrary propositions.Clearly , you 've never met my ex-wife .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is our mind, which cannot simultaneously reconcile to apparently contrary propositions.Clearly, you've never met my ex-wife.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30008736</id>
	<title>impossibilty drive</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257540960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and that's how to build an impossibilty drive</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and that 's how to build an impossibilty drive</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and that's how to build an impossibilty drive</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006690</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>mrdoogee</author>
	<datestamp>1257529680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum\_suicide\_and\_immortality" title="wikipedia.org">Quantum Suicide</a> [wikipedia.org] is what the theory is called.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quantum Suicide [ wikipedia.org ] is what the theory is called .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quantum Suicide [wikipedia.org] is what the theory is called.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852</id>
	<title>Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>Cyberax</author>
	<datestamp>1257501300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK. That proves it.</p><p>Multi-world interpretation is correct and LHC is just a variant of quantum-suicide experiment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK. That proves it.Multi-world interpretation is correct and LHC is just a variant of quantum-suicide experiment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK. That proves it.Multi-world interpretation is correct and LHC is just a variant of quantum-suicide experiment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004198</id>
	<title>Why not run the experiment?</title>
	<author>greenash</author>
	<datestamp>1257507360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I don't understand is, why not run the "card" experiment? Commit to shutting down (or delayng for 30 yeas) the LHC if three one-in-a-million consecutive dice-throws turn negative. That would beat wasting so much money on a failed experiment. The chance of "false positives" would be negligibly small.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I do n't understand is , why not run the " card " experiment ?
Commit to shutting down ( or delayng for 30 yeas ) the LHC if three one-in-a-million consecutive dice-throws turn negative .
That would beat wasting so much money on a failed experiment .
The chance of " false positives " would be negligibly small .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I don't understand is, why not run the "card" experiment?
Commit to shutting down (or delayng for 30 yeas) the LHC if three one-in-a-million consecutive dice-throws turn negative.
That would beat wasting so much money on a failed experiment.
The chance of "false positives" would be negligibly small.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005916</id>
	<title>Re:Impossible to operate?</title>
	<author>omkhar</author>
	<datestamp>1257524640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>or it was thrown out of a passing aeroplane.</p></div><p>Thrown out of a passing aeroplane? Really? Have you tried opening the windows on an aeroplane recently? I suppose someone could have flown over in a bi-plane... but really?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>or it was thrown out of a passing aeroplane.Thrown out of a passing aeroplane ?
Really ? Have you tried opening the windows on an aeroplane recently ?
I suppose someone could have flown over in a bi-plane... but really ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or it was thrown out of a passing aeroplane.Thrown out of a passing aeroplane?
Really? Have you tried opening the windows on an aeroplane recently?
I suppose someone could have flown over in a bi-plane... but really?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009028</id>
	<title>Re:The temp rise in question</title>
	<author>ColaMan</author>
	<datestamp>1257499020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's the thing - I don't usually go trolling, but I couldn't resist slipping in a little one into my post, just to see if anyone would bite.</p><p>Yes, I am quite aware of what CERN (and principally, Tim Berners-Lee) did for us here on slashdot. Having experienced the internet pre-HTTP, I'm very glad that they let their creation loose upon the world.</p><p>Well..... *one* of their creations, anyway. The jury's still out on the LHC.</p><p>(and your post is modded 'informative' !? It's a sad day for slashdot)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's the thing - I do n't usually go trolling , but I could n't resist slipping in a little one into my post , just to see if anyone would bite.Yes , I am quite aware of what CERN ( and principally , Tim Berners-Lee ) did for us here on slashdot .
Having experienced the internet pre-HTTP , I 'm very glad that they let their creation loose upon the world.Well..... * one * of their creations , anyway .
The jury 's still out on the LHC .
( and your post is modded 'informative ' ! ?
It 's a sad day for slashdot )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's the thing - I don't usually go trolling, but I couldn't resist slipping in a little one into my post, just to see if anyone would bite.Yes, I am quite aware of what CERN (and principally, Tim Berners-Lee) did for us here on slashdot.
Having experienced the internet pre-HTTP, I'm very glad that they let their creation loose upon the world.Well..... *one* of their creations, anyway.
The jury's still out on the LHC.
(and your post is modded 'informative' !?
It's a sad day for slashdot)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003940</id>
	<title>Re:Bird briefing...</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1257502620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The bird's briefing:</p><p>The approach will not be easy. You are required to maneuver straight down this trench and skim the surface to this point. The target area is only two meters wide. It's a small thermal exhaust port, right below the main port. The shaft leads directly to the reactor system. A precise hit will start a chain reaction which should destroy the station.</p></div><p>If the bird has been hitting womp-rats back home there should be no problem.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The bird 's briefing : The approach will not be easy .
You are required to maneuver straight down this trench and skim the surface to this point .
The target area is only two meters wide .
It 's a small thermal exhaust port , right below the main port .
The shaft leads directly to the reactor system .
A precise hit will start a chain reaction which should destroy the station.If the bird has been hitting womp-rats back home there should be no problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The bird's briefing:The approach will not be easy.
You are required to maneuver straight down this trench and skim the surface to this point.
The target area is only two meters wide.
It's a small thermal exhaust port, right below the main port.
The shaft leads directly to the reactor system.
A precise hit will start a chain reaction which should destroy the station.If the bird has been hitting womp-rats back home there should be no problem.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006020</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>kalirion</author>
	<datestamp>1257525600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>this theory has actually been proposed: That activating the LHC would actually destroy the universe, that is, the whole universe, even reaching back into the past. That would mean that the only possible universes are ones in which the LHC is never activated, which means that if we keep trying, implausible events will continue to occur, preventing the LHC from activating- after all, we're here now, right. That's \_proof\_ that the LHC will never be activated!</i></p><p>The universe does NOT need to actually reach into the past.  As I've said in the previous story, and seen someone else mention in this one, this could be an example of a universe-level quantum suicide scenario.  If activating the LHC destroys the universe (or at least human life), then the only universes where human life exists are ones where the LHC was never activated.  That doesn't mean that LHC won't be activated in <i>this</i> universe, it just means we won't be there to notice it (but our doubles in other universes will be spared by absurd events.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this theory has actually been proposed : That activating the LHC would actually destroy the universe , that is , the whole universe , even reaching back into the past .
That would mean that the only possible universes are ones in which the LHC is never activated , which means that if we keep trying , implausible events will continue to occur , preventing the LHC from activating- after all , we 're here now , right .
That 's \ _proof \ _ that the LHC will never be activated ! The universe does NOT need to actually reach into the past .
As I 've said in the previous story , and seen someone else mention in this one , this could be an example of a universe-level quantum suicide scenario .
If activating the LHC destroys the universe ( or at least human life ) , then the only universes where human life exists are ones where the LHC was never activated .
That does n't mean that LHC wo n't be activated in this universe , it just means we wo n't be there to notice it ( but our doubles in other universes will be spared by absurd events .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this theory has actually been proposed: That activating the LHC would actually destroy the universe, that is, the whole universe, even reaching back into the past.
That would mean that the only possible universes are ones in which the LHC is never activated, which means that if we keep trying, implausible events will continue to occur, preventing the LHC from activating- after all, we're here now, right.
That's \_proof\_ that the LHC will never be activated!The universe does NOT need to actually reach into the past.
As I've said in the previous story, and seen someone else mention in this one, this could be an example of a universe-level quantum suicide scenario.
If activating the LHC destroys the universe (or at least human life), then the only universes where human life exists are ones where the LHC was never activated.
That doesn't mean that LHC won't be activated in this universe, it just means we won't be there to notice it (but our doubles in other universes will be spared by absurd events.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006800</id>
	<title>The real danger:</title>
	<author>Desiderius</author>
	<datestamp>1257530400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't leaving extremely powerful particle stream generating equipment out in the open air how supervillains get made?<br> <br>

Tell me this isn't how it happens: some escaping convict, with dogs barking and flashlights swinging wildly behind him is being chased through the Swiss woods. He jumps the one fence with the "do not enter" sign even as the klaxons begin to blare in warning of the experiment beginning. In his panic he doesn't notice the air-cooling door opening ahead of him and falls through into the machine itself. He yells, and bangs on the walls but is unheard and unnoticed as the cold voice of science counts down to ignition over a distant intercom. The hairs on his arms stand on end and electricity crackles through the air around him as the room begins to glow...
<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...and so on. It's how we end up with the nefarious Baguette Man. Hrm... maybe it was on the French side instead of Switzerland?<br> <br>

More the point: what kind of open-air equipment is immune to rain and vulnerable to bread?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't leaving extremely powerful particle stream generating equipment out in the open air how supervillains get made ?
Tell me this is n't how it happens : some escaping convict , with dogs barking and flashlights swinging wildly behind him is being chased through the Swiss woods .
He jumps the one fence with the " do not enter " sign even as the klaxons begin to blare in warning of the experiment beginning .
In his panic he does n't notice the air-cooling door opening ahead of him and falls through into the machine itself .
He yells , and bangs on the walls but is unheard and unnoticed as the cold voice of science counts down to ignition over a distant intercom .
The hairs on his arms stand on end and electricity crackles through the air around him as the room begins to glow.. . ...and so on .
It 's how we end up with the nefarious Baguette Man .
Hrm... maybe it was on the French side instead of Switzerland ?
More the point : what kind of open-air equipment is immune to rain and vulnerable to bread ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't leaving extremely powerful particle stream generating equipment out in the open air how supervillains get made?
Tell me this isn't how it happens: some escaping convict, with dogs barking and flashlights swinging wildly behind him is being chased through the Swiss woods.
He jumps the one fence with the "do not enter" sign even as the klaxons begin to blare in warning of the experiment beginning.
In his panic he doesn't notice the air-cooling door opening ahead of him and falls through into the machine itself.
He yells, and bangs on the walls but is unheard and unnoticed as the cold voice of science counts down to ignition over a distant intercom.
The hairs on his arms stand on end and electricity crackles through the air around him as the room begins to glow...
  ...and so on.
It's how we end up with the nefarious Baguette Man.
Hrm... maybe it was on the French side instead of Switzerland?
More the point: what kind of open-air equipment is immune to rain and vulnerable to bread?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003908</id>
	<title>Misleading summary title</title>
	<author>addsalt</author>
	<datestamp>1257502140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>A baguette did not shut down the LHC because the LHC wasn't running (doesn't take superman to halt a train that isn't moving). Even the summary states <p><div class="quote"><p>The LHC was not operational at the time of the incident</p></div><p> and the TFA </p><p><div class="quote"><p>This incident won't delay the reactivation of the facility later this month</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A baguette did not shut down the LHC because the LHC was n't running ( does n't take superman to halt a train that is n't moving ) .
Even the summary states The LHC was not operational at the time of the incident and the TFA This incident wo n't delay the reactivation of the facility later this month</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A baguette did not shut down the LHC because the LHC wasn't running (doesn't take superman to halt a train that isn't moving).
Even the summary states The LHC was not operational at the time of the incident and the TFA This incident won't delay the reactivation of the facility later this month
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004366</id>
	<title>Re:Put a roof over it or something?</title>
	<author>Qubit</author>
	<datestamp>1257510240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>what kind of vulnerable kit is this anyways?</p></div><p>Government project....lowest bidder?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>what kind of vulnerable kit is this anyways ? Government project....lowest bidder ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what kind of vulnerable kit is this anyways?Government project....lowest bidder?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006838</id>
	<title>It should be up &amp; running...</title>
	<author>dos4who</author>
	<datestamp>1257530700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...somewhere around December 20th, 2012.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...somewhere around December 20th , 2012 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...somewhere around December 20th, 2012.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30015868</id>
	<title>Re:All the universes where the bread missed a busb</title>
	<author>toddestan</author>
	<datestamp>1257623340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the other hand, even if the LHC is completely harmless, there will still exist a universe that we can never get the LHC to work due to a seemingly never-ending sequence of bizarre and unlikely events.  Just like there must exist somewhere a universe where an unlikely and bizarre sequence of events prevents me from ever starting my car.</p><p>In that sense, just because we can't get the LHC to work doesn't mean it can potentially destroy us or the universe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the other hand , even if the LHC is completely harmless , there will still exist a universe that we can never get the LHC to work due to a seemingly never-ending sequence of bizarre and unlikely events .
Just like there must exist somewhere a universe where an unlikely and bizarre sequence of events prevents me from ever starting my car.In that sense , just because we ca n't get the LHC to work does n't mean it can potentially destroy us or the universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the other hand, even if the LHC is completely harmless, there will still exist a universe that we can never get the LHC to work due to a seemingly never-ending sequence of bizarre and unlikely events.
Just like there must exist somewhere a universe where an unlikely and bizarre sequence of events prevents me from ever starting my car.In that sense, just because we can't get the LHC to work doesn't mean it can potentially destroy us or the universe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005858</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257524340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't need the whole universe to be destroyed, just the Earth. Sterile universes have no observers so they don't change anything. The conditional probability of having a universe with certain properties, given an observer in it, stays the same.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't need the whole universe to be destroyed , just the Earth .
Sterile universes have no observers so they do n't change anything .
The conditional probability of having a universe with certain properties , given an observer in it , stays the same .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't need the whole universe to be destroyed, just the Earth.
Sterile universes have no observers so they don't change anything.
The conditional probability of having a universe with certain properties, given an observer in it, stays the same.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30008084</id>
	<title>Re:Impossible to operate?</title>
	<author>waddleman</author>
	<datestamp>1257538080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How does a piece of bread dropped from the sky by a bid or airplane get on a busbar <b>inside</b> a building?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How does a piece of bread dropped from the sky by a bid or airplane get on a busbar inside a building ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does a piece of bread dropped from the sky by a bid or airplane get on a busbar inside a building?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006546</id>
	<title>Useless.</title>
	<author>Snarkalicious</author>
	<datestamp>1257528900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What the hell kind a nerds we got on this thing, anyway?  Not one of them learned enough from the failings of Darth Sidious to COVER THE FUCKING EXHAUST PORT?!?!!!11?!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>What the hell kind a nerds we got on this thing , anyway ?
Not one of them learned enough from the failings of Darth Sidious to COVER THE FUCKING EXHAUST PORT ? ! ? ! ! ! 11 ? !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the hell kind a nerds we got on this thing, anyway?
Not one of them learned enough from the failings of Darth Sidious to COVER THE FUCKING EXHAUST PORT?!?!!!11?!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004132</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257506040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The birds are in collaboration with the mice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The birds are in collaboration with the mice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The birds are in collaboration with the mice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005440</id>
	<title>Those darned French</title>
	<author>codeButcher</author>
	<datestamp>1257521580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They should have built the thing somewhere else, where there are no baguettes available. Somewhere that is so notorious for it's bland-tasting, non-nutritious bread that even hungry scavenging birds won't touch it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They should have built the thing somewhere else , where there are no baguettes available .
Somewhere that is so notorious for it 's bland-tasting , non-nutritious bread that even hungry scavenging birds wo n't touch it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should have built the thing somewhere else, where there are no baguettes available.
Somewhere that is so notorious for it's bland-tasting, non-nutritious bread that even hungry scavenging birds won't touch it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004142</id>
	<title>Philip K Dickhead</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257506220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Philip K Dickhead writes...</p></div><p>Posting things like this on the front page makes<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. look very childish.<br>I don't care if it's someone's username. It's crass and offensive.</p><p>Timothy, you should know better.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Philip K Dickhead writes...Posting things like this on the front page makes / .
look very childish.I do n't care if it 's someone 's username .
It 's crass and offensive.Timothy , you should know better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Philip K Dickhead writes...Posting things like this on the front page makes /.
look very childish.I don't care if it's someone's username.
It's crass and offensive.Timothy, you should know better.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30010218</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257504180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So....Hostess started making baguettes?  As long as it stays in the wrapper, it's good for a quarter century.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So....Hostess started making baguettes ?
As long as it stays in the wrapper , it 's good for a quarter century .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So....Hostess started making baguettes?
As long as it stays in the wrapper, it's good for a quarter century.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004750</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006290</id>
	<title>Re:All the universes where the bread missed a busb</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1257527280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since this incident didn't happen while the LHC was turned on and won't delay turning it on, it cannot be attributed to the quantum suicide theory.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since this incident did n't happen while the LHC was turned on and wo n't delay turning it on , it can not be attributed to the quantum suicide theory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since this incident didn't happen while the LHC was turned on and won't delay turning it on, it cannot be attributed to the quantum suicide theory.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30020066</id>
	<title>Re:Bird briefing...</title>
	<author>ElderKorean</author>
	<datestamp>1257675120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If the bird has been hitting womp-rats back home there should be no problem.</p></div><p>Most prey birds do this everyday to survive.</p><p>Flying in and grabbing the unlucky lunch.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the bird has been hitting womp-rats back home there should be no problem.Most prey birds do this everyday to survive.Flying in and grabbing the unlucky lunch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the bird has been hitting womp-rats back home there should be no problem.Most prey birds do this everyday to survive.Flying in and grabbing the unlucky lunch.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005360</id>
	<title>Re:Put a roof over it or something?</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1257521040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; I've never heard of such deleterious effects of a bird dropping anything on<br>&gt; outdoor power station switchgear<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... what kind of vulnerable kit is this<br>&gt; anyways?</p><p>Ordinary outdoor power switchgear.  This comes to us from the Register via something called "Popsci".  Take that into consideration.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I 've never heard of such deleterious effects of a bird dropping anything on &gt; outdoor power station switchgear ... what kind of vulnerable kit is this &gt; anyways ? Ordinary outdoor power switchgear .
This comes to us from the Register via something called " Popsci " .
Take that into consideration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I've never heard of such deleterious effects of a bird dropping anything on&gt; outdoor power station switchgear ... what kind of vulnerable kit is this&gt; anyways?Ordinary outdoor power switchgear.
This comes to us from the Register via something called "Popsci".
Take that into consideration.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004290</id>
	<title>Didn't these guys see Star Wars?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257508860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it only took an X wing to blow up the Death Star via an exhaust port, surely they could have seen something like this happening when they they were building the LHC</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it only took an X wing to blow up the Death Star via an exhaust port , surely they could have seen something like this happening when they they were building the LHC</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it only took an X wing to blow up the Death Star via an exhaust port, surely they could have seen something like this happening when they they were building the LHC</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005236</id>
	<title>Re:All the universes where the bread missed a busb</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257520080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I find the whole concept that we can destroy the Universe fundamentally ridiculous.  Perhaps if the beam hits your ego...<br> <br>

I mean do you know what we are on that scale?  We're specks even compared to the miniscule star we orbit.  Itself a speck inside a cloud of billions of specks, amongst billions of billions of clouds of billions of specks.<br> <br>

And we can destroy all this?  Heh, <i>no</i>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I find the whole concept that we can destroy the Universe fundamentally ridiculous .
Perhaps if the beam hits your ego.. . I mean do you know what we are on that scale ?
We 're specks even compared to the miniscule star we orbit .
Itself a speck inside a cloud of billions of specks , amongst billions of billions of clouds of billions of specks .
And we can destroy all this ?
Heh , no .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find the whole concept that we can destroy the Universe fundamentally ridiculous.
Perhaps if the beam hits your ego... 

I mean do you know what we are on that scale?
We're specks even compared to the miniscule star we orbit.
Itself a speck inside a cloud of billions of specks, amongst billions of billions of clouds of billions of specks.
And we can destroy all this?
Heh, no.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007360</id>
	<title>A bird?  A lazy WORKER.</title>
	<author>Areyoukiddingme</author>
	<datestamp>1257533700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's an indoor piece of equipment.  Above ground, but still in a building.  Stupid reporter thought above ground meant outdoors.</p><p>It's a slice of bread.  Birds don't SLICE bread.  Nor do they carry around whole slices.  Some lazy-ass contractor was sitting on a catwalk having lunch, dropped a slice, looked down into a mess of gear, shrugged, and went back to his sandwich.  They're covering for his ass with stupid theories so they don't have to launch a full scale investigation and fire somebody for jamming up the works by being first clumsy and then criminally negligent by not reporting the incident and getting it taken care of.</p><p>They need to perform the full scale investigation.  If the schlub drops a slice of bread somewhere else, they could lose something a lot more expensive and difficult to replace than 5 degrees kelvin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's an indoor piece of equipment .
Above ground , but still in a building .
Stupid reporter thought above ground meant outdoors.It 's a slice of bread .
Birds do n't SLICE bread .
Nor do they carry around whole slices .
Some lazy-ass contractor was sitting on a catwalk having lunch , dropped a slice , looked down into a mess of gear , shrugged , and went back to his sandwich .
They 're covering for his ass with stupid theories so they do n't have to launch a full scale investigation and fire somebody for jamming up the works by being first clumsy and then criminally negligent by not reporting the incident and getting it taken care of.They need to perform the full scale investigation .
If the schlub drops a slice of bread somewhere else , they could lose something a lot more expensive and difficult to replace than 5 degrees kelvin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's an indoor piece of equipment.
Above ground, but still in a building.
Stupid reporter thought above ground meant outdoors.It's a slice of bread.
Birds don't SLICE bread.
Nor do they carry around whole slices.
Some lazy-ass contractor was sitting on a catwalk having lunch, dropped a slice, looked down into a mess of gear, shrugged, and went back to his sandwich.
They're covering for his ass with stupid theories so they don't have to launch a full scale investigation and fire somebody for jamming up the works by being first clumsy and then criminally negligent by not reporting the incident and getting it taken care of.They need to perform the full scale investigation.
If the schlub drops a slice of bread somewhere else, they could lose something a lot more expensive and difficult to replace than 5 degrees kelvin.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005656</id>
	<title>Their carrier sucks, too....</title>
	<author>Hasai</author>
	<datestamp>1257523020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Perhaps it is the Universe itself, conspiring against the revelations intimated by the operation of CERN's Large Hadron Collider?</p></div><p>Nah; just typical French engineering. Carriers, airport terminals, EU parliament buildings.... You name it, they can screw it up.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps it is the Universe itself , conspiring against the revelations intimated by the operation of CERN 's Large Hadron Collider ? Nah ; just typical French engineering .
Carriers , airport terminals , EU parliament buildings.... You name it , they can screw it up .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps it is the Universe itself, conspiring against the revelations intimated by the operation of CERN's Large Hadron Collider?Nah; just typical French engineering.
Carriers, airport terminals, EU parliament buildings.... You name it, they can screw it up.
:P
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004108</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257505800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So then is this the improbability drive? Eee gads!!!! Douglas Adams was a prophet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So then is this the improbability drive ?
Eee gads ! ! ! !
Douglas Adams was a prophet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So then is this the improbability drive?
Eee gads!!!!
Douglas Adams was a prophet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003992</id>
	<title>multiverse</title>
	<author>madaerodog</author>
	<datestamp>1257503820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>from the infinite number of parallel universes it had to happen in ours! common fate could you give our universe a break?</htmltext>
<tokenext>from the infinite number of parallel universes it had to happen in ours !
common fate could you give our universe a break ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>from the infinite number of parallel universes it had to happen in ours!
common fate could you give our universe a break?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004750</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257516360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The weirdest thing is that we found the wrapper of the baguette nearby but for some reason the best before date appears to be 23th Dec 2012. Go figure.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The weirdest thing is that we found the wrapper of the baguette nearby but for some reason the best before date appears to be 23th Dec 2012 .
Go figure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The weirdest thing is that we found the wrapper of the baguette nearby but for some reason the best before date appears to be 23th Dec 2012.
Go figure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009590</id>
	<title>Re:Evacuate this universe!</title>
	<author>MiniMike</author>
	<datestamp>1257501360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, what you're saying is that if the LHC is never activated, that proves what it was designed to prove when it was activated?  I think I'm getting a headache, sent from the future...
<p>
What if the theory is correct except for the part about reaching into the past?  Or maybe if the theory is accurate, it would be impossible to even build the machine or think of the theory that would actually destroy the universe, and the LHC isn't even potentially dangerous (unless you stick your head in the beam).  Here comes my headache...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , what you 're saying is that if the LHC is never activated , that proves what it was designed to prove when it was activated ?
I think I 'm getting a headache , sent from the future.. . What if the theory is correct except for the part about reaching into the past ?
Or maybe if the theory is accurate , it would be impossible to even build the machine or think of the theory that would actually destroy the universe , and the LHC is n't even potentially dangerous ( unless you stick your head in the beam ) .
Here comes my headache.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, what you're saying is that if the LHC is never activated, that proves what it was designed to prove when it was activated?
I think I'm getting a headache, sent from the future...

What if the theory is correct except for the part about reaching into the past?
Or maybe if the theory is accurate, it would be impossible to even build the machine or think of the theory that would actually destroy the universe, and the LHC isn't even potentially dangerous (unless you stick your head in the beam).
Here comes my headache...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006886</id>
	<title>Re:Confused</title>
	<author>pwfffff</author>
	<datestamp>1257530940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can you explain to me why it's a good idea to get in a hunk of metal traveling 60+ mph on the same roads that we let 80 year old people drive on? Or do you not leave your house?</p><p>I haven't done the math, but I can say with a fair amount of certainty that the odds of the LHC destroying the universe are about the same as you getting struck by lightning, a comet, a crashing 747, and a baguette, all at once.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you explain to me why it 's a good idea to get in a hunk of metal traveling 60 + mph on the same roads that we let 80 year old people drive on ?
Or do you not leave your house ? I have n't done the math , but I can say with a fair amount of certainty that the odds of the LHC destroying the universe are about the same as you getting struck by lightning , a comet , a crashing 747 , and a baguette , all at once .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you explain to me why it's a good idea to get in a hunk of metal traveling 60+ mph on the same roads that we let 80 year old people drive on?
Or do you not leave your house?I haven't done the math, but I can say with a fair amount of certainty that the odds of the LHC destroying the universe are about the same as you getting struck by lightning, a comet, a crashing 747, and a baguette, all at once.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30011408</id>
	<title>Re:Put a roof over it or something?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257512820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone ever heard of N+1 design?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone ever heard of N + 1 design ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone ever heard of N+1 design?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004022</id>
	<title>You 1nsensitive c7od!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257504240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Come on baby...and am protestIng the above is fAr Codebase became</htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on baby...and am protestIng the above is fAr Codebase became</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on baby...and am protestIng the above is fAr Codebase became</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006988</id>
	<title>Re:The temp rise in question</title>
	<author>pgn674</author>
	<datestamp>1257531600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Pretty wild to think that a rise up to 8 kelvin is a "serious overtemp event".</p></div><p>It looks like it rose from approximately 2 Kelvin to 8 Kelvin. The magnet got 4 times as hot as it's supposed to be. And that's actually a very accurate conceptual statement, I think, unlike how 2 degrees Centigrade to 8 degrees Centigrade and 2 degrees Fahrenheit to 8 degrees Fahrenheit are not going to 4 times as hot.<br> <br>It's still wild to think that such a small change in temperature got the magnets 4 times as much heat energy as they're supposed to have, but it does make the claim that it's a serious overtemp event easier to understand.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty wild to think that a rise up to 8 kelvin is a " serious overtemp event " .It looks like it rose from approximately 2 Kelvin to 8 Kelvin .
The magnet got 4 times as hot as it 's supposed to be .
And that 's actually a very accurate conceptual statement , I think , unlike how 2 degrees Centigrade to 8 degrees Centigrade and 2 degrees Fahrenheit to 8 degrees Fahrenheit are not going to 4 times as hot .
It 's still wild to think that such a small change in temperature got the magnets 4 times as much heat energy as they 're supposed to have , but it does make the claim that it 's a serious overtemp event easier to understand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty wild to think that a rise up to 8 kelvin is a "serious overtemp event".It looks like it rose from approximately 2 Kelvin to 8 Kelvin.
The magnet got 4 times as hot as it's supposed to be.
And that's actually a very accurate conceptual statement, I think, unlike how 2 degrees Centigrade to 8 degrees Centigrade and 2 degrees Fahrenheit to 8 degrees Fahrenheit are not going to 4 times as hot.
It's still wild to think that such a small change in temperature got the magnets 4 times as much heat energy as they're supposed to have, but it does make the claim that it's a serious overtemp event easier to understand.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005436</id>
	<title>Re:Here's another idea</title>
	<author>EvilBudMan</author>
	<datestamp>1257521520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hypothesis: There are multiple birds. Birds eat multiple times. Birds have to do #2 multiple times because they eat multiple times.</p><p>Alternative hypothesis: Bird po came through another universe. Obviously we can't see it, measure it, etc.</p><p>3rd hypothesis: The LHC is switched on and someone smells the smell of burning bird po. Pe-ew!</p><p>The oxen is slow but the earth is patient.</p><p>I will shave you with Occam's razor. He gave it to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hypothesis : There are multiple birds .
Birds eat multiple times .
Birds have to do # 2 multiple times because they eat multiple times.Alternative hypothesis : Bird po came through another universe .
Obviously we ca n't see it , measure it , etc.3rd hypothesis : The LHC is switched on and someone smells the smell of burning bird po .
Pe-ew ! The oxen is slow but the earth is patient.I will shave you with Occam 's razor .
He gave it to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hypothesis: There are multiple birds.
Birds eat multiple times.
Birds have to do #2 multiple times because they eat multiple times.Alternative hypothesis: Bird po came through another universe.
Obviously we can't see it, measure it, etc.3rd hypothesis: The LHC is switched on and someone smells the smell of burning bird po.
Pe-ew!The oxen is slow but the earth is patient.I will shave you with Occam's razor.
He gave it to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30011550</id>
	<title>Higgs-Boson-lander...</title>
	<author>Lost Penguin</author>
	<datestamp>1257514440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There can be only one Higgs-Boson.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There can be only one Higgs-Boson .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There can be only one Higgs-Boson.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004138</id>
	<title>Who's paying?</title>
	<author>LinuxAndLube</author>
	<datestamp>1257506160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please remind me. Who's paying for this piece of junk again?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please remind me .
Who 's paying for this piece of junk again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please remind me.
Who's paying for this piece of junk again?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30010572</id>
	<title>Dickhead, mmkay?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257506280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just wanted to say that Dickhead as a last name is... fantastic!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just wanted to say that Dickhead as a last name is... fantastic !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just wanted to say that Dickhead as a last name is... fantastic!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005926</id>
	<title>Inconceivable!</title>
	<author>tompaulco</author>
	<datestamp>1257524760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i> It now appears that the collider is hindered from an initial firing by a baguette, dropped by a passing bird:</i> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...at an improbability level of 2 to the power of 5,086,362,826 to 1 against.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It now appears that the collider is hindered from an initial firing by a baguette , dropped by a passing bird : ...at an improbability level of 2 to the power of 5,086,362,826 to 1 against .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> It now appears that the collider is hindered from an initial firing by a baguette, dropped by a passing bird:  ...at an improbability level of 2 to the power of 5,086,362,826 to 1 against.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004112</id>
	<title>Birds from the FUTURE</title>
	<author>mykos</author>
	<datestamp>1257505920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What if the theories about sabotage from the future are right?  It would make my small bits tingle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What if the theories about sabotage from the future are right ?
It would make my small bits tingle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if the theories about sabotage from the future are right?
It would make my small bits tingle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30008736
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005204
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30013916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30013010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30010668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30020066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30015868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30010430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004676
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006230
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006512
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30010218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30008456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006922
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005236
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30008084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007672
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30011166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30012798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30011408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005838
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30016238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0824213_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007138
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003846
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006006
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004722
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007188
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30015868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30016238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005236
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006290
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006108
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003992
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003940
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30020066
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005838
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005238
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30010430
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004472
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004044
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004224
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006704
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003914
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004284
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004486
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30010668
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005828
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30013916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005386
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003904
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004010
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009954
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004634
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006394
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30012798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005204
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30008084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30011166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004416
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005360
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004150
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30011408
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006838
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004104
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004700
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003832
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003908
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004002
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004108
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006020
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004750
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30010218
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006966
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005858
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006690
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004408
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007660
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006906
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30013010
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005702
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30008736
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009590
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004770
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30008456
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009126
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006678
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30009686
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006922
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005740
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006248
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005440
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006512
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004198
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004138
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007168
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0824213.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30003996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30004614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30006886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30005554
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007672
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0824213.30007312
</commentlist>
</conversation>
