<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_05_0336210</id>
	<title>Low-Energy Laser Etching May Replace Fruit Labels</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1257425820000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>MikeChino writes <i>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label? The small sticky labels have long been the bane of waste-conscious fruit and vegetable eaters, but that might all change thanks to new technology that uses a low-energy carbon dioxide laser beam to <a href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/11/04/low-energy-laser-etching-could-replace-annoying-fruit-labels/">etch information directly onto produce</a>. No more peeling those annoying labels! So far the technology is being used on a number of fruits and vegetables in New Zealand, Australia, and Pacific Rim countries, and it's currently going through the final stages of review by the FDA. Once the technology is approved in the US, researchers from the University of Florida and the USDA Agricultural Research Service hope that it will be used in Florida's massive grapefruit industry."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>MikeChino writes " How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you 're also chomping on a sticker label ?
The small sticky labels have long been the bane of waste-conscious fruit and vegetable eaters , but that might all change thanks to new technology that uses a low-energy carbon dioxide laser beam to etch information directly onto produce .
No more peeling those annoying labels !
So far the technology is being used on a number of fruits and vegetables in New Zealand , Australia , and Pacific Rim countries , and it 's currently going through the final stages of review by the FDA .
Once the technology is approved in the US , researchers from the University of Florida and the USDA Agricultural Research Service hope that it will be used in Florida 's massive grapefruit industry .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MikeChino writes "How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?
The small sticky labels have long been the bane of waste-conscious fruit and vegetable eaters, but that might all change thanks to new technology that uses a low-energy carbon dioxide laser beam to etch information directly onto produce.
No more peeling those annoying labels!
So far the technology is being used on a number of fruits and vegetables in New Zealand, Australia, and Pacific Rim countries, and it's currently going through the final stages of review by the FDA.
Once the technology is approved in the US, researchers from the University of Florida and the USDA Agricultural Research Service hope that it will be used in Florida's massive grapefruit industry.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995114</id>
	<title>Fricken laser beams</title>
	<author>AlpineR</author>
	<datestamp>1257438060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lasers have been used for many years to label regular manufactured objects like bottles and bumpers. I'm sure somebody wanted to laser label fruit sooner, but it took a while to get cheap and effective technology to identify and target every single fruit as thousands per minute pass on a conveyor. Natural objects have a bunch more variability than manufactured ones.</p><p>I've heard of developers making lasers that can shoot female mosquitoes in flight to stop reproduction and reduce the spread of malaria. I've also heard of researchers developing the ability to identify individual cancer cells floating through the bloodstream. If you could identify, target, and shoot cancer cells then you might help stop a cancer from metastasizing while the main tumor is attacked by conventional means. And if you could shrink the system into an implantable device, you might leave it as a sentry in a person with a history of cancer.</p><p>So the economic forces that lead to laser etching for fruits just might lead to applications you find less frivolous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lasers have been used for many years to label regular manufactured objects like bottles and bumpers .
I 'm sure somebody wanted to laser label fruit sooner , but it took a while to get cheap and effective technology to identify and target every single fruit as thousands per minute pass on a conveyor .
Natural objects have a bunch more variability than manufactured ones.I 've heard of developers making lasers that can shoot female mosquitoes in flight to stop reproduction and reduce the spread of malaria .
I 've also heard of researchers developing the ability to identify individual cancer cells floating through the bloodstream .
If you could identify , target , and shoot cancer cells then you might help stop a cancer from metastasizing while the main tumor is attacked by conventional means .
And if you could shrink the system into an implantable device , you might leave it as a sentry in a person with a history of cancer.So the economic forces that lead to laser etching for fruits just might lead to applications you find less frivolous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lasers have been used for many years to label regular manufactured objects like bottles and bumpers.
I'm sure somebody wanted to laser label fruit sooner, but it took a while to get cheap and effective technology to identify and target every single fruit as thousands per minute pass on a conveyor.
Natural objects have a bunch more variability than manufactured ones.I've heard of developers making lasers that can shoot female mosquitoes in flight to stop reproduction and reduce the spread of malaria.
I've also heard of researchers developing the ability to identify individual cancer cells floating through the bloodstream.
If you could identify, target, and shoot cancer cells then you might help stop a cancer from metastasizing while the main tumor is attacked by conventional means.
And if you could shrink the system into an implantable device, you might leave it as a sentry in a person with a history of cancer.So the economic forces that lead to laser etching for fruits just might lead to applications you find less frivolous.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998626</id>
	<title>Re:An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>Faerunner</author>
	<datestamp>1257454200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To be honest, I'd rather have a slightly blemished, organically-grown apple I grew in my back yard than a blemish-free apple from Wal-Mart, carvings or not.

<br> <br>I am always horrified by the amount of fruit that is tossed aside at the store for a small bruise, green spot, brown spot, scabbing, or other "blemish" that in no way affects the taste and/or can be easily removed with the tip of a sharp knife. One store near my last apartment used to put that kind of fruit on a "last chance" stand for a third of the price, and if you got it the day it was set out it would often be perfectly enjoyable. I rarely had to remove any whole fruits from the bags, I often got mixed bags of apples and oranges in quantities that two people could actually eat (vs. buying single ones or whole bags at the front of the store) and I was able to get fruits that I otherwise wouldn't have gotten, like two pints of slightly dry blueberries (not a single rotten fruit, just "old") which made amazing blueberry and white chocolate tarts. Bruised apples make perfectly good pie, too - once they're baked, you will never notice the bruised parts.

<br> <br>Maybe instead of figuring out how to etch things onto fruit, they need to be working on educating consumers about how to use fruit that's already got markings on it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>To be honest , I 'd rather have a slightly blemished , organically-grown apple I grew in my back yard than a blemish-free apple from Wal-Mart , carvings or not .
I am always horrified by the amount of fruit that is tossed aside at the store for a small bruise , green spot , brown spot , scabbing , or other " blemish " that in no way affects the taste and/or can be easily removed with the tip of a sharp knife .
One store near my last apartment used to put that kind of fruit on a " last chance " stand for a third of the price , and if you got it the day it was set out it would often be perfectly enjoyable .
I rarely had to remove any whole fruits from the bags , I often got mixed bags of apples and oranges in quantities that two people could actually eat ( vs. buying single ones or whole bags at the front of the store ) and I was able to get fruits that I otherwise would n't have gotten , like two pints of slightly dry blueberries ( not a single rotten fruit , just " old " ) which made amazing blueberry and white chocolate tarts .
Bruised apples make perfectly good pie , too - once they 're baked , you will never notice the bruised parts .
Maybe instead of figuring out how to etch things onto fruit , they need to be working on educating consumers about how to use fruit that 's already got markings on it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be honest, I'd rather have a slightly blemished, organically-grown apple I grew in my back yard than a blemish-free apple from Wal-Mart, carvings or not.
I am always horrified by the amount of fruit that is tossed aside at the store for a small bruise, green spot, brown spot, scabbing, or other "blemish" that in no way affects the taste and/or can be easily removed with the tip of a sharp knife.
One store near my last apartment used to put that kind of fruit on a "last chance" stand for a third of the price, and if you got it the day it was set out it would often be perfectly enjoyable.
I rarely had to remove any whole fruits from the bags, I often got mixed bags of apples and oranges in quantities that two people could actually eat (vs. buying single ones or whole bags at the front of the store) and I was able to get fruits that I otherwise wouldn't have gotten, like two pints of slightly dry blueberries (not a single rotten fruit, just "old") which made amazing blueberry and white chocolate tarts.
Bruised apples make perfectly good pie, too - once they're baked, you will never notice the bruised parts.
Maybe instead of figuring out how to etch things onto fruit, they need to be working on educating consumers about how to use fruit that's already got markings on it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994118</id>
	<title>I, for one</title>
	<author>osomoore</author>
	<datestamp>1257432840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>welcome our new laser-etched fruit-lords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>welcome our new laser-etched fruit-lords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>welcome our new laser-etched fruit-lords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30004816</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257517080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It definitely does.  The laser burns the text onto the fruit, so there's obviously a burning process, and burning organic materials leads to a lot of carcinogenic compounds, which is why you're not supposed to eat burned foods.  On an orange this isn't so bad, cause you won't eat the fruit's peel.  But I would never eat any food that has this going on on the actual food (ie. and apple).  Furthermore, I will emphatically say that I would never eat a fruit with this type of burned on labelling b/c it comprimises the integrity of the peel.  Any blemish, dead spot, hole, worm bite, etc. is a spot that becomes much easier for the fruit to go bad by quicker because the peel in that area is already dead.  I'm quite certain that if we ran tests we'd probably see that the burned label food goes bad faster that unburned food.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It definitely does .
The laser burns the text onto the fruit , so there 's obviously a burning process , and burning organic materials leads to a lot of carcinogenic compounds , which is why you 're not supposed to eat burned foods .
On an orange this is n't so bad , cause you wo n't eat the fruit 's peel .
But I would never eat any food that has this going on on the actual food ( ie .
and apple ) .
Furthermore , I will emphatically say that I would never eat a fruit with this type of burned on labelling b/c it comprimises the integrity of the peel .
Any blemish , dead spot , hole , worm bite , etc .
is a spot that becomes much easier for the fruit to go bad by quicker because the peel in that area is already dead .
I 'm quite certain that if we ran tests we 'd probably see that the burned label food goes bad faster that unburned food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It definitely does.
The laser burns the text onto the fruit, so there's obviously a burning process, and burning organic materials leads to a lot of carcinogenic compounds, which is why you're not supposed to eat burned foods.
On an orange this isn't so bad, cause you won't eat the fruit's peel.
But I would never eat any food that has this going on on the actual food (ie.
and apple).
Furthermore, I will emphatically say that I would never eat a fruit with this type of burned on labelling b/c it comprimises the integrity of the peel.
Any blemish, dead spot, hole, worm bite, etc.
is a spot that becomes much easier for the fruit to go bad by quicker because the peel in that area is already dead.
I'm quite certain that if we ran tests we'd probably see that the burned label food goes bad faster that unburned food.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998632</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>Darinbob</author>
	<datestamp>1257454260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, they just used to stamp labels on with ink which looked very similar to the picture.  You get a good non-toxic ink and this seems such a simple solution over stickers or lasers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , they just used to stamp labels on with ink which looked very similar to the picture .
You get a good non-toxic ink and this seems such a simple solution over stickers or lasers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, they just used to stamp labels on with ink which looked very similar to the picture.
You get a good non-toxic ink and this seems such a simple solution over stickers or lasers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993814</id>
	<title>How long before they "enhance" the appearance</title>
	<author>FridgeFreezer</author>
	<datestamp>1257431220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they can laser etch messages then the next step is using it to remove blemishes, enhance the appearance, and effectively "photoshop" food to make it appear more photogenic.</p><p>Then again, am I the only one who thinks this could be the next step in tattoo art - never mind some hairy goth with a needle, give me a CNC laser that can print my choice of design onto my arm at 1200dpi and I might consider it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they can laser etch messages then the next step is using it to remove blemishes , enhance the appearance , and effectively " photoshop " food to make it appear more photogenic.Then again , am I the only one who thinks this could be the next step in tattoo art - never mind some hairy goth with a needle , give me a CNC laser that can print my choice of design onto my arm at 1200dpi and I might consider it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they can laser etch messages then the next step is using it to remove blemishes, enhance the appearance, and effectively "photoshop" food to make it appear more photogenic.Then again, am I the only one who thinks this could be the next step in tattoo art - never mind some hairy goth with a needle, give me a CNC laser that can print my choice of design onto my arm at 1200dpi and I might consider it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993872</id>
	<title>I've never bit into fruit with labels...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257431520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...'coz I wash my greens/fruits carefully before eating them. Anything else would be just disgusting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...'coz I wash my greens/fruits carefully before eating them .
Anything else would be just disgusting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...'coz I wash my greens/fruits carefully before eating them.
Anything else would be just disgusting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29999700</id>
	<title>Global warming solved.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257415560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Note this uses a carbon dioxide laser i.e. the solution to global warming, the more lasers we build the more we sequestrate the CO2.<br>Woohoo, a win-win for all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Note this uses a carbon dioxide laser i.e .
the solution to global warming , the more lasers we build the more we sequestrate the CO2.Woohoo , a win-win for all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Note this uses a carbon dioxide laser i.e.
the solution to global warming, the more lasers we build the more we sequestrate the CO2.Woohoo, a win-win for all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30006404</id>
	<title>Re:abundance</title>
	<author>bobzaguy</author>
	<datestamp>1257527880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Therefore God is organized abundance."  &mdash;Newt Gingrich</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Therefore God is organized abundance .
"    Newt Gingrich</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Therefore God is organized abundance.
"  —Newt Gingrich</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996536</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257444900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I live in New Jersey - I couldn't care less if it causes cancer in the state of California.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in New Jersey - I could n't care less if it causes cancer in the state of California .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in New Jersey - I couldn't care less if it causes cancer in the state of California.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993896</id>
	<title>We need more moderation choices</title>
	<author>Shivetya</author>
	<datestamp>1257431640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>because I would select "Scary but True +1" for your post.</p><p>We could have the reverse too "Turn in your tinfoil hat -1"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>because I would select " Scary but True + 1 " for your post.We could have the reverse too " Turn in your tinfoil hat -1 "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because I would select "Scary but True +1" for your post.We could have the reverse too "Turn in your tinfoil hat -1"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994774</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>Joce640k</author>
	<datestamp>1257436200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Laser etching can be art, too. Once they get the machines installed you can bet they'll start doing fancy designs - Halloween pumpkins with the faces etched on, special limited edition designs on all your favorite Xmas fruits (collect them all!), Chinese fruits with fortunes etched on them, the only limit is your imagination!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Laser etching can be art , too .
Once they get the machines installed you can bet they 'll start doing fancy designs - Halloween pumpkins with the faces etched on , special limited edition designs on all your favorite Xmas fruits ( collect them all !
) , Chinese fruits with fortunes etched on them , the only limit is your imagination !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Laser etching can be art, too.
Once they get the machines installed you can bet they'll start doing fancy designs - Halloween pumpkins with the faces etched on, special limited edition designs on all your favorite Xmas fruits (collect them all!
), Chinese fruits with fortunes etched on them, the only limit is your imagination!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995448</id>
	<title>Re:An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1257439680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not to mention, us real men don't eat no rabbit food.  BBQing with laser won't tempt us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention , us real men do n't eat no rabbit food .
BBQing with laser wo n't tempt us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention, us real men don't eat no rabbit food.
BBQing with laser won't tempt us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994296</id>
	<title>Re:Dude</title>
	<author>TheTrollToll</author>
	<datestamp>1257433740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>While we're at it why don't we complain that the CO2 laser is going to increase gobal warming</htmltext>
<tokenext>While we 're at it why do n't we complain that the CO2 laser is going to increase gobal warming</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While we're at it why don't we complain that the CO2 laser is going to increase gobal warming</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996522</id>
	<title>Re:Finally.</title>
	<author>ArsenneLupin</author>
	<datestamp>1257444840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Maybe now we can get around to tackling cancer.</p></div><p>So, let's start by transforming dull apple skin into nicely charred carcinogens!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe now we can get around to tackling cancer.So , let 's start by transforming dull apple skin into nicely charred carcinogens !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe now we can get around to tackling cancer.So, let's start by transforming dull apple skin into nicely charred carcinogens!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29997990</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257451560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a stupid technology and should be banned from production. Don't ruin our fruit by super microwaving it. It's hard to find any food not processed by greedy, meddling humans. Fruit is the only food least processed by humans and now they want to ruin that too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a stupid technology and should be banned from production .
Do n't ruin our fruit by super microwaving it .
It 's hard to find any food not processed by greedy , meddling humans .
Fruit is the only food least processed by humans and now they want to ruin that too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a stupid technology and should be banned from production.
Don't ruin our fruit by super microwaving it.
It's hard to find any food not processed by greedy, meddling humans.
Fruit is the only food least processed by humans and now they want to ruin that too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30005560</id>
	<title>Marketing confusion looms</title>
	<author>ResidentSourcerer</author>
	<datestamp>1257522420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The idea of burning the label into the skin brings a whole new meaning to 'branding' and 'brand power'</p><p>Endless confusion on Madison Avenue</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The idea of burning the label into the skin brings a whole new meaning to 'branding ' and 'brand power'Endless confusion on Madison Avenue</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The idea of burning the label into the skin brings a whole new meaning to 'branding' and 'brand power'Endless confusion on Madison Avenue</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994950</id>
	<title>Re:Or... Don't label it on the fruit at all!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257437220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How will you know it's an orange then?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How will you know it 's an orange then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How will you know it's an orange then?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29999252</id>
	<title>Lasers and fruit</title>
	<author>mu51c10rd</author>
	<datestamp>1257413640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are they ill-tempered fruits?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are they ill-tempered fruits ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are they ill-tempered fruits?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993746</id>
	<title>Finally.</title>
	<author>NoPantsJim</author>
	<datestamp>1257430860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thank god we've finally gotten to the bottom of that whole fruit label thing. Maybe now we can get around to tackling cancer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank god we 've finally gotten to the bottom of that whole fruit label thing .
Maybe now we can get around to tackling cancer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank god we've finally gotten to the bottom of that whole fruit label thing.
Maybe now we can get around to tackling cancer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996228</id>
	<title>Re:Dude</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257443340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If a laser isn't mounted on a shark's head, then it isn't really an interesting laser.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If a laser is n't mounted on a shark 's head , then it is n't really an interesting laser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a laser isn't mounted on a shark's head, then it isn't really an interesting laser.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995614</id>
	<title>Re:An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>Ksevio</author>
	<datestamp>1257440580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apart from the fact I've never taken a bite into a sticker, I've also never taken a bit out of the skin of a citrus fruit (like the one in the picture) so I don't think this is really going to be a big improvement in that department.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apart from the fact I 've never taken a bite into a sticker , I 've also never taken a bit out of the skin of a citrus fruit ( like the one in the picture ) so I do n't think this is really going to be a big improvement in that department .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apart from the fact I've never taken a bite into a sticker, I've also never taken a bit out of the skin of a citrus fruit (like the one in the picture) so I don't think this is really going to be a big improvement in that department.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996210</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>radl</author>
	<datestamp>1257443280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...contains substances known in the state of California to cause cancer.</p></div><p>I don't expect high doses, but I do expect the laser branding to create <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acrylamide" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Acrylamide</a> [wikipedia.org], which is suspected to cause cancer. So maybe this technique is better for fruits, which skin is not eaten.
</p><p>However, I'm going to have a cigarette. <em>Now</em>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...contains substances known in the state of California to cause cancer.I do n't expect high doses , but I do expect the laser branding to create Acrylamide [ wikipedia.org ] , which is suspected to cause cancer .
So maybe this technique is better for fruits , which skin is not eaten .
However , I 'm going to have a cigarette .
Now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...contains substances known in the state of California to cause cancer.I don't expect high doses, but I do expect the laser branding to create Acrylamide [wikipedia.org], which is suspected to cause cancer.
So maybe this technique is better for fruits, which skin is not eaten.
However, I'm going to have a cigarette.
Now.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29997786</id>
	<title>Re:Finally.</title>
	<author>apoc.famine</author>
	<datestamp>1257450780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure the same people are working on those two problems....But if they were, I bet all cancer treatments would involve lasers....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure the same people are working on those two problems....But if they were , I bet all cancer treatments would involve lasers... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure the same people are working on those two problems....But if they were, I bet all cancer treatments would involve lasers....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995864</id>
	<title>esthetics ...</title>
	<author>BenBoy</author>
	<datestamp>1257441660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lovely; now my bowl of fruit can sport UPC's. I can see the still-life now. Looks like one of wired's found future objects<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lovely ; now my bowl of fruit can sport UPC 's .
I can see the still-life now .
Looks like one of wired 's found future objects : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lovely; now my bowl of fruit can sport UPC's.
I can see the still-life now.
Looks like one of wired's found future objects :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994132</id>
	<title>Re:An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>egcagrac0</author>
	<datestamp>1257432900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For lemons, limes, and oranges - fruits where the skin is used as a garnish - I'd prefer to stick with stickers.  I can remove a sticker, but I can't un-etch the skin, and I may not be able to cut around it for a pretty orange twist in my cosmopolitan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For lemons , limes , and oranges - fruits where the skin is used as a garnish - I 'd prefer to stick with stickers .
I can remove a sticker , but I ca n't un-etch the skin , and I may not be able to cut around it for a pretty orange twist in my cosmopolitan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For lemons, limes, and oranges - fruits where the skin is used as a garnish - I'd prefer to stick with stickers.
I can remove a sticker, but I can't un-etch the skin, and I may not be able to cut around it for a pretty orange twist in my cosmopolitan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998160</id>
	<title>Why stop there?</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1257452340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not gouge a UPC barcode into them as well?  Hey, wait... can we do this with babies when they're born?  Can we zap a barcode into their foreheads that will stay put?  I call dibs on one that translates to 666.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not gouge a UPC barcode into them as well ?
Hey , wait... can we do this with babies when they 're born ?
Can we zap a barcode into their foreheads that will stay put ?
I call dibs on one that translates to 666 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not gouge a UPC barcode into them as well?
Hey, wait... can we do this with babies when they're born?
Can we zap a barcode into their foreheads that will stay put?
I call dibs on one that translates to 666.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29999020</id>
	<title>Re:An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>moortak</author>
	<datestamp>1257412740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm more worried that it would alter the taste of  orange or lemon zest for recipes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm more worried that it would alter the taste of orange or lemon zest for recipes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm more worried that it would alter the taste of  orange or lemon zest for recipes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993830</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>NoPantsJim</author>
	<datestamp>1257431340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Something makes me think he meant for this post to be modded funny...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Something makes me think he meant for this post to be modded funny.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something makes me think he meant for this post to be modded funny...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996390</id>
	<title>Re:An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>ArsenneLupin</author>
	<datestamp>1257444120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think the laser etching would be ok for stuff like oranges, grapefruit and <b>bananas</b> (fruits where the skin is typically not eaten)..</p> </div><p>I once met a banana that insisted that I eat it with skin! I found that odd as well, because usually it's the eaters that would insist on skin, not the other way round.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the laser etching would be ok for stuff like oranges , grapefruit and bananas ( fruits where the skin is typically not eaten ) .. I once met a banana that insisted that I eat it with skin !
I found that odd as well , because usually it 's the eaters that would insist on skin , not the other way round .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the laser etching would be ok for stuff like oranges, grapefruit and bananas (fruits where the skin is typically not eaten).. I once met a banana that insisted that I eat it with skin!
I found that odd as well, because usually it's the eaters that would insist on skin, not the other way round.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995814</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257441420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd rather deal with the laser etching than adhesives on the fruits - especially since they don't indicate what the adhesives on the labels are. Are they allergens?</p><p>It'd also be nice if they'd etch produce such as cucumbers with the type of oil/wax they use to preserve them; is it just paraffin? Is it hypoallegenic, such as canola? Or is it one of the big allergens like peanut or soybean oil? Is it palm oil?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather deal with the laser etching than adhesives on the fruits - especially since they do n't indicate what the adhesives on the labels are .
Are they allergens ? It 'd also be nice if they 'd etch produce such as cucumbers with the type of oil/wax they use to preserve them ; is it just paraffin ?
Is it hypoallegenic , such as canola ?
Or is it one of the big allergens like peanut or soybean oil ?
Is it palm oil ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather deal with the laser etching than adhesives on the fruits - especially since they don't indicate what the adhesives on the labels are.
Are they allergens?It'd also be nice if they'd etch produce such as cucumbers with the type of oil/wax they use to preserve them; is it just paraffin?
Is it hypoallegenic, such as canola?
Or is it one of the big allergens like peanut or soybean oil?
Is it palm oil?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993866</id>
	<title>I don't want to know where it comes from . . .</title>
	<author>PolygamousRanchKid </author>
	<datestamp>1257431520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>. . . I want to know if it tastes good.
</p><p>Fruit should be lasered according to how it tastes: "Good", "Great!", "Sweaty Tennis Socks", etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.
. .
I want to know if it tastes good .
Fruit should be lasered according to how it tastes : " Good " , " Great !
" , " Sweaty Tennis Socks " , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.
. .
I want to know if it tastes good.
Fruit should be lasered according to how it tastes: "Good", "Great!
", "Sweaty Tennis Socks", etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994060</id>
	<title>Re:An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>mad\_minstrel</author>
	<datestamp>1257432360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have you ever roasted an apple? The laser does the same thing. Besides, stickers need glue that I don't want on my food.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you ever roasted an apple ?
The laser does the same thing .
Besides , stickers need glue that I do n't want on my food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you ever roasted an apple?
The laser does the same thing.
Besides, stickers need glue that I don't want on my food.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995024</id>
	<title>Thta's gonna look appetising...</title>
	<author>clickety6</author>
	<datestamp>1257437580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article shows pictures of fruit where you peel off the skin. OK.</p><p>But it also shows samples of tomatoes and peppers branded by the laser. When I make stuffed peppers or grilled tomatoes I don't what to have see all that burnt on lettering over the food. It will spoil the look of the meal.</p><p>At least a sticker I can peel off. Not that fruit should need labels anyway. I know what sort of fruit they are and I can tell if they're fresh and they're usually right next to big sign telling me how much they cost where they're from. What more do I need to know that you feel is important enough to have to laser etch into my food?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article shows pictures of fruit where you peel off the skin .
OK.But it also shows samples of tomatoes and peppers branded by the laser .
When I make stuffed peppers or grilled tomatoes I do n't what to have see all that burnt on lettering over the food .
It will spoil the look of the meal.At least a sticker I can peel off .
Not that fruit should need labels anyway .
I know what sort of fruit they are and I can tell if they 're fresh and they 're usually right next to big sign telling me how much they cost where they 're from .
What more do I need to know that you feel is important enough to have to laser etch into my food ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article shows pictures of fruit where you peel off the skin.
OK.But it also shows samples of tomatoes and peppers branded by the laser.
When I make stuffed peppers or grilled tomatoes I don't what to have see all that burnt on lettering over the food.
It will spoil the look of the meal.At least a sticker I can peel off.
Not that fruit should need labels anyway.
I know what sort of fruit they are and I can tell if they're fresh and they're usually right next to big sign telling me how much they cost where they're from.
What more do I need to know that you feel is important enough to have to laser etch into my food?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995978</id>
	<title>No stickers == Inattentive kids won't suffer!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257442140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remember <a href="http://www3.whdh.com/news/articles/national/BO58807/" title="whdh.com">Josie Dressendorfer</a> [whdh.com]?  She was a six-year-old who had a fruit sticker caught in one of her lungs.  I blame the parents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember Josie Dressendorfer [ whdh.com ] ?
She was a six-year-old who had a fruit sticker caught in one of her lungs .
I blame the parents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember Josie Dressendorfer [whdh.com]?
She was a six-year-old who had a fruit sticker caught in one of her lungs.
I blame the parents.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580</id>
	<title>Lecture Fruit!</title>
	<author>happy\_place</author>
	<datestamp>1257429660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't wait til they're required by law to give us all the nutritional information of every piece of fruit, down to the calorie count and the chemical breakdown. Perhaps government will put missing persons reports on them, or government mandated reminders of what it means to be a good citizen! So many useful applications!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait til they 're required by law to give us all the nutritional information of every piece of fruit , down to the calorie count and the chemical breakdown .
Perhaps government will put missing persons reports on them , or government mandated reminders of what it means to be a good citizen !
So many useful applications !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait til they're required by law to give us all the nutritional information of every piece of fruit, down to the calorie count and the chemical breakdown.
Perhaps government will put missing persons reports on them, or government mandated reminders of what it means to be a good citizen!
So many useful applications!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994084</id>
	<title>Oh the tyranny of fruit stickers</title>
	<author>BeanThere</author>
	<datestamp>1257432540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?"</p><p>Honestly? Never. Ever. I didn't know this was a problem tha</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you 're also chomping on a sticker label ? " Honestly ?
Never. Ever .
I did n't know this was a problem tha</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?"Honestly?
Never. Ever.
I didn't know this was a problem tha</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994506</id>
	<title>Re:Dude</title>
	<author>emm-tee</author>
	<datestamp>1257434880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>For a technology site, most of the comments here are surprisingly anti-technology.</p><p>A new graphics card comes out?  Commentors will gripe that old school games with shitty graphics are better anyway.</p></div><p>Darn kids! Get off my lawn!</p><p>On topic... I hate those stickers.  They end up stuck to random things.  Some people seem to stick them to things (e.g. in a line around the edge of their monitor).  I find them a bit disgusting, in a similar way to chewing gum that gets stuck everywhere.  Weird and irrational, I know.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For a technology site , most of the comments here are surprisingly anti-technology.A new graphics card comes out ?
Commentors will gripe that old school games with shitty graphics are better anyway.Darn kids !
Get off my lawn ! On topic... I hate those stickers .
They end up stuck to random things .
Some people seem to stick them to things ( e.g .
in a line around the edge of their monitor ) .
I find them a bit disgusting , in a similar way to chewing gum that gets stuck everywhere .
Weird and irrational , I know .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a technology site, most of the comments here are surprisingly anti-technology.A new graphics card comes out?
Commentors will gripe that old school games with shitty graphics are better anyway.Darn kids!
Get off my lawn!On topic... I hate those stickers.
They end up stuck to random things.
Some people seem to stick them to things (e.g.
in a line around the edge of their monitor).
I find them a bit disgusting, in a similar way to chewing gum that gets stuck everywhere.
Weird and irrational, I know.
:)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994004</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257432120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A CO2 laser has a wavelength of 10600 nm (i.e. pretty deep into the infrared).  I'm not seeing any specific reactions or chemical absorbers in the literature on a quick check, nor would I expect to - a single photon of 10600 nm light contains far too little energy to break any bonds.  Instead, when the photon is absorbed it makes the molecule vibrate a little, and the kinetic energy is transferred to the surrounding water (or other) molecules as heat energy.  This is where the misconception stems from that IR = heat; heat results when the photon of IR light is absorbed, but a photon is a photon is a photon...  Basically, the color change is going to be a burn pattern, so there's nothing to fear from it over and above any concern you'd have for cooked fruits (e.g. pie filling).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A CO2 laser has a wavelength of 10600 nm ( i.e .
pretty deep into the infrared ) .
I 'm not seeing any specific reactions or chemical absorbers in the literature on a quick check , nor would I expect to - a single photon of 10600 nm light contains far too little energy to break any bonds .
Instead , when the photon is absorbed it makes the molecule vibrate a little , and the kinetic energy is transferred to the surrounding water ( or other ) molecules as heat energy .
This is where the misconception stems from that IR = heat ; heat results when the photon of IR light is absorbed , but a photon is a photon is a photon... Basically , the color change is going to be a burn pattern , so there 's nothing to fear from it over and above any concern you 'd have for cooked fruits ( e.g .
pie filling ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A CO2 laser has a wavelength of 10600 nm (i.e.
pretty deep into the infrared).
I'm not seeing any specific reactions or chemical absorbers in the literature on a quick check, nor would I expect to - a single photon of 10600 nm light contains far too little energy to break any bonds.
Instead, when the photon is absorbed it makes the molecule vibrate a little, and the kinetic energy is transferred to the surrounding water (or other) molecules as heat energy.
This is where the misconception stems from that IR = heat; heat results when the photon of IR light is absorbed, but a photon is a photon is a photon...  Basically, the color change is going to be a burn pattern, so there's nothing to fear from it over and above any concern you'd have for cooked fruits (e.g.
pie filling).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993704</id>
	<title>Corporate advertising.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257430560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"This Apple brought to you by Apple"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" This Apple brought to you by Apple "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"This Apple brought to you by Apple"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996890</id>
	<title>Re:We don't need no stickers at all..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257446640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like those self-checkout lanes.  Organic bananas for the price of regular!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like those self-checkout lanes .
Organic bananas for the price of regular !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like those self-checkout lanes.
Organic bananas for the price of regular!
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994680</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995812</id>
	<title>Re:Pumpkin Decorating...OF THE FUTURE!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257441420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, seems like it will ruin pumpkin decorating as it will prevent you from using whichever side of the pumpkin has the brand engraved on it, or force you to cut-out the portion with the engraving.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , seems like it will ruin pumpkin decorating as it will prevent you from using whichever side of the pumpkin has the brand engraved on it , or force you to cut-out the portion with the engraving .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, seems like it will ruin pumpkin decorating as it will prevent you from using whichever side of the pumpkin has the brand engraved on it, or force you to cut-out the portion with the engraving.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993864</id>
	<title>Sad Cats</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257431520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well what the hell am i supposed to stick on my cats' foreheads now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well what the hell am i supposed to stick on my cats ' foreheads now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well what the hell am i supposed to stick on my cats' foreheads now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30005736</id>
	<title>Don't Lase Me Bro</title>
	<author>vaporland</author>
	<datestamp>1257523440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Could this technology be used to apply tattoos to people? Would that represent a threat to the hard working skin artists of the American tattoo industry? Is the grungy, sensitive biker dude who etches L O V E on one set of knuckles and H A T E on the other about to be replaced by a carbon dioxide laser?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could this technology be used to apply tattoos to people ?
Would that represent a threat to the hard working skin artists of the American tattoo industry ?
Is the grungy , sensitive biker dude who etches L O V E on one set of knuckles and H A T E on the other about to be replaced by a carbon dioxide laser ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could this technology be used to apply tattoos to people?
Would that represent a threat to the hard working skin artists of the American tattoo industry?
Is the grungy, sensitive biker dude who etches L O V E on one set of knuckles and H A T E on the other about to be replaced by a carbon dioxide laser?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993682</id>
	<title>Re:Lecture Fruit!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257430380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and next thing will be company xyz etching commercials , or marketing crap into it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and next thing will be company xyz etching commercials , or marketing crap into it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and next thing will be company xyz etching commercials , or marketing crap into it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590</id>
	<title>An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257429720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?"</i> <br> <br>
Erm, never? Because I always wash my fruits (as in apples, pears) first before eating them?<br>
This is an answer in search of a problem: To be honest, I'd rather have a blemish-free apple, than one with carvings.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you 're also chomping on a sticker label ?
" Erm , never ?
Because I always wash my fruits ( as in apples , pears ) first before eating them ?
This is an answer in search of a problem : To be honest , I 'd rather have a blemish-free apple , than one with carvings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?
"  
Erm, never?
Because I always wash my fruits (as in apples, pears) first before eating them?
This is an answer in search of a problem: To be honest, I'd rather have a blemish-free apple, than one with carvings.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996652</id>
	<title>Zestfully Clean</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257445440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Many recipes call for the zest of a fruit.  While I can wash off a sticker, not so for a laser burn.  I sure hope the etching process does not taint the zest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Many recipes call for the zest of a fruit .
While I can wash off a sticker , not so for a laser burn .
I sure hope the etching process does not taint the zest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many recipes call for the zest of a fruit.
While I can wash off a sticker, not so for a laser burn.
I sure hope the etching process does not taint the zest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995100</id>
	<title>Re:Lecture Fruit!</title>
	<author>mea37</author>
	<datestamp>1257437940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, yeah, the big nasty government has been waiting for the day when it could piss you off by putting information you don't want on your fruit.  They just couldn't find a way to put that information there until now.</p><p>We were counting on them never hearing of adhesive labels, but now they have lasers!  Damn you to hell, lasers!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , yeah , the big nasty government has been waiting for the day when it could piss you off by putting information you do n't want on your fruit .
They just could n't find a way to put that information there until now.We were counting on them never hearing of adhesive labels , but now they have lasers !
Damn you to hell , lasers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, yeah, the big nasty government has been waiting for the day when it could piss you off by putting information you don't want on your fruit.
They just couldn't find a way to put that information there until now.We were counting on them never hearing of adhesive labels, but now they have lasers!
Damn you to hell, lasers!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994606</id>
	<title>No more peeling the rind to add flavor while cooki</title>
	<author>Talahaski</author>
	<datestamp>1257435420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think the label ever bothered me, I knew to peel it off.

Now if you start burning the outside layer of citrus It will be a pain to peel the rind for use in cooking.  Peeling a label off does not ruin the rind, but I would not want lazer burned rind used for flavoring any of my desserts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think the label ever bothered me , I knew to peel it off .
Now if you start burning the outside layer of citrus It will be a pain to peel the rind for use in cooking .
Peeling a label off does not ruin the rind , but I would not want lazer burned rind used for flavoring any of my desserts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think the label ever bothered me, I knew to peel it off.
Now if you start burning the outside layer of citrus It will be a pain to peel the rind for use in cooking.
Peeling a label off does not ruin the rind, but I would not want lazer burned rind used for flavoring any of my desserts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998056</id>
	<title>How long do you think it will take</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257451860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for some bright spark to get creative with this?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for some bright spark to get creative with this ?
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for some bright spark to get creative with this?
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995138</id>
	<title>Great!  More branding!</title>
	<author>johneee</author>
	<datestamp>1257438180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And yet another thing that used to not be permanently branded with one or more company's logo disappears.</p><p>When the last one disappears, will we notice?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And yet another thing that used to not be permanently branded with one or more company 's logo disappears.When the last one disappears , will we notice ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And yet another thing that used to not be permanently branded with one or more company's logo disappears.When the last one disappears, will we notice?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993782</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257431040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think they solved the wrong problem.</p></div><p>I agree. While it's good that this may rid us of plastic labels in advanced countries, I am originally from the third world. Our fruits do not need labels. Advertising on the skin of edibles is overrated, considering that people don't peel certain types: apples, mangoes, peaches...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think they solved the wrong problem.I agree .
While it 's good that this may rid us of plastic labels in advanced countries , I am originally from the third world .
Our fruits do not need labels .
Advertising on the skin of edibles is overrated , considering that people do n't peel certain types : apples , mangoes , peaches.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think they solved the wrong problem.I agree.
While it's good that this may rid us of plastic labels in advanced countries, I am originally from the third world.
Our fruits do not need labels.
Advertising on the skin of edibles is overrated, considering that people don't peel certain types: apples, mangoes, peaches...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998800</id>
	<title>Never</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257411900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?"</p><p>Never, because I'm not stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you 're also chomping on a sticker label ?
" Never , because I 'm not stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?
"Never, because I'm not stupid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995984</id>
	<title>Re:Pumpkin Decorating...OF THE FUTURE!</title>
	<author>Mindcontrolled</author>
	<datestamp>1257442140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Potatoes with cooking instructions.</p></div><p>Like... Drop into boiling water until ready? Nope, we have to use this technology to its full potential. Use the laser to scan the exact geometry of the potato, then determine its weight. Inscription: "Based on the weight, density and geometry of this potato, cooking time will be 18 minutes, 26 seconds at standard atmospheric pressure. To adjust for your local air pressure, see table with correction factors etched on the backside."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Potatoes with cooking instructions.Like... Drop into boiling water until ready ?
Nope , we have to use this technology to its full potential .
Use the laser to scan the exact geometry of the potato , then determine its weight .
Inscription : " Based on the weight , density and geometry of this potato , cooking time will be 18 minutes , 26 seconds at standard atmospheric pressure .
To adjust for your local air pressure , see table with correction factors etched on the backside .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Potatoes with cooking instructions.Like... Drop into boiling water until ready?
Nope, we have to use this technology to its full potential.
Use the laser to scan the exact geometry of the potato, then determine its weight.
Inscription: "Based on the weight, density and geometry of this potato, cooking time will be 18 minutes, 26 seconds at standard atmospheric pressure.
To adjust for your local air pressure, see table with correction factors etched on the backside.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738</id>
	<title>Dude</title>
	<author>ShooterNeo</author>
	<datestamp>1257430800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For a technology site, most of the comments here are surprisingly anti-technology.</p><p>A new graphics card comes out?  Commentors will gripe that old school games with shitty graphics are better anyway.</p><p>A new CPU comes out?  Same thing : commentors will complain that extra CPU power is just more cycles for crummy, inefficient programming to squander with useless eye candy features.</p><p>A laser that eliminates that annoying plastic label on fruit and the FCKING ARTICLE says that it's safe?  Commentors say that THEY won't benefit because THEY always peel and wash their fruit, and they're afraid that the lasering will make fruit decay sooner (without reading the article that says the lasering does not appreciably damage the fruit's skin)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For a technology site , most of the comments here are surprisingly anti-technology.A new graphics card comes out ?
Commentors will gripe that old school games with shitty graphics are better anyway.A new CPU comes out ?
Same thing : commentors will complain that extra CPU power is just more cycles for crummy , inefficient programming to squander with useless eye candy features.A laser that eliminates that annoying plastic label on fruit and the FCKING ARTICLE says that it 's safe ?
Commentors say that THEY wo n't benefit because THEY always peel and wash their fruit , and they 're afraid that the lasering will make fruit decay sooner ( without reading the article that says the lasering does not appreciably damage the fruit 's skin )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a technology site, most of the comments here are surprisingly anti-technology.A new graphics card comes out?
Commentors will gripe that old school games with shitty graphics are better anyway.A new CPU comes out?
Same thing : commentors will complain that extra CPU power is just more cycles for crummy, inefficient programming to squander with useless eye candy features.A laser that eliminates that annoying plastic label on fruit and the FCKING ARTICLE says that it's safe?
Commentors say that THEY won't benefit because THEY always peel and wash their fruit, and they're afraid that the lasering will make fruit decay sooner (without reading the article that says the lasering does not appreciably damage the fruit's skin)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30000294</id>
	<title>Re:An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>Convector</author>
	<datestamp>1257418080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not yet!  I'm working on it.  It'll be a few months for my stickerfruit to ripen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not yet !
I 'm working on it .
It 'll be a few months for my stickerfruit to ripen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not yet!
I'm working on it.
It'll be a few months for my stickerfruit to ripen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30000300</id>
	<title>But what about lemon twists?</title>
	<author>MattskEE</author>
	<datestamp>1257418080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This doesn't seem like a bad idea, because these labels may end up being cheaper and they can't fall off or be switched.  So it helps out large processors and grocery stores.</p><p>However, for uses like citrus twists in beverages, citrus wedges or wheels in drinks, and citrus zest for flavoring I don't want anything marring the skin of my fruit.  Sure I could work around the labels, but I don't necessarily want to, it means I can use less of the fruit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This does n't seem like a bad idea , because these labels may end up being cheaper and they ca n't fall off or be switched .
So it helps out large processors and grocery stores.However , for uses like citrus twists in beverages , citrus wedges or wheels in drinks , and citrus zest for flavoring I do n't want anything marring the skin of my fruit .
Sure I could work around the labels , but I do n't necessarily want to , it means I can use less of the fruit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This doesn't seem like a bad idea, because these labels may end up being cheaper and they can't fall off or be switched.
So it helps out large processors and grocery stores.However, for uses like citrus twists in beverages, citrus wedges or wheels in drinks, and citrus zest for flavoring I don't want anything marring the skin of my fruit.
Sure I could work around the labels, but I don't necessarily want to, it means I can use less of the fruit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996422</id>
	<title>what the heck?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257444300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?"</p><p>Emm, never???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you 're also chomping on a sticker label ?
" Emm , never ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?
"Emm, never??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993792</id>
	<title>can't they just make the sticker edible?</title>
	<author>locksmith101</author>
	<datestamp>1257431100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe it's just me, but I feel that I haven't tasted a real fruit (or vegetable) for some years now. Non-organic fruits have a similar tasteless taste. Anyway, making fruity flavoured edible stickers would make just as much sense as tattooing food.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it 's just me , but I feel that I have n't tasted a real fruit ( or vegetable ) for some years now .
Non-organic fruits have a similar tasteless taste .
Anyway , making fruity flavoured edible stickers would make just as much sense as tattooing food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it's just me, but I feel that I haven't tasted a real fruit (or vegetable) for some years now.
Non-organic fruits have a similar tasteless taste.
Anyway, making fruity flavoured edible stickers would make just as much sense as tattooing food.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993838</id>
	<title>those stickers are edible</title>
	<author>j1mmy</author>
	<datestamp>1257431400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they don't taste that bad, really.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they do n't taste that bad , really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they don't taste that bad, really.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995418</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong problem</title>
	<author>Eponymous Coward</author>
	<datestamp>1257439500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd also like to see where the fruit is from, possibly even identify the grower. There are three basic reasons:</p><p>1. I prefer to buy stuff grown close to where I live. My grocery store will generally include the country of origin in the signage, but I really don't trust that they get that right.<br>2. If there is some type of contamination problem, the CDC could more quickly track down the source and scope of the problem.<br>3. I might discover that some growers produce better or worse food than others. The information could help me spend my food dollars more effectively.</p><p>-ec</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd also like to see where the fruit is from , possibly even identify the grower .
There are three basic reasons : 1 .
I prefer to buy stuff grown close to where I live .
My grocery store will generally include the country of origin in the signage , but I really do n't trust that they get that right.2 .
If there is some type of contamination problem , the CDC could more quickly track down the source and scope of the problem.3 .
I might discover that some growers produce better or worse food than others .
The information could help me spend my food dollars more effectively.-ec</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd also like to see where the fruit is from, possibly even identify the grower.
There are three basic reasons:1.
I prefer to buy stuff grown close to where I live.
My grocery store will generally include the country of origin in the signage, but I really don't trust that they get that right.2.
If there is some type of contamination problem, the CDC could more quickly track down the source and scope of the problem.3.
I might discover that some growers produce better or worse food than others.
The information could help me spend my food dollars more effectively.-ec</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994978</id>
	<title>Re:Lecture Fruit!</title>
	<author>aetherworld</author>
	<datestamp>1257437340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Advertising will probably be the very <em>first</em> thing we will find on fruits once the FDA approves this new technique. Can't wait for my laser etched Chiquita banana!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Advertising will probably be the very first thing we will find on fruits once the FDA approves this new technique .
Ca n't wait for my laser etched Chiquita banana !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Advertising will probably be the very first thing we will find on fruits once the FDA approves this new technique.
Can't wait for my laser etched Chiquita banana!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995326</id>
	<title>It's the new advertising channel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257439020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>John goes out to the store and buys an apple.  The apple has a data matrix on it that when scanned with John's cell phone camera takes him to a web site that tells him where the fruit came from and shows some nice pictures of  a beautiful country side.  Now John is really happy with his apple and would like to buy a trip to that nice locale.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>John goes out to the store and buys an apple .
The apple has a data matrix on it that when scanned with John 's cell phone camera takes him to a web site that tells him where the fruit came from and shows some nice pictures of a beautiful country side .
Now John is really happy with his apple and would like to buy a trip to that nice locale .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>John goes out to the store and buys an apple.
The apple has a data matrix on it that when scanned with John's cell phone camera takes him to a web site that tells him where the fruit came from and shows some nice pictures of  a beautiful country side.
Now John is really happy with his apple and would like to buy a trip to that nice locale.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998834</id>
	<title>Re:Lecture Fruit!</title>
	<author>interploy</author>
	<datestamp>1257412080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can already see a new market for advertising...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can already see a new market for advertising.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can already see a new market for advertising...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994282</id>
	<title>Re:Dear /. editors</title>
	<author>hughperkins</author>
	<datestamp>1257433680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Never mind, try again tomorrow.  All the best articles come twice!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Never mind , try again tomorrow .
All the best articles come twice !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never mind, try again tomorrow.
All the best articles come twice!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993848</id>
	<title>Re:Lecture Fruit!</title>
	<author>captainpanic</author>
	<datestamp>1257431460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I can't wait til they're required by law to give us all the nutritional information of every piece of fruit, down to the calorie count and the chemical breakdown. Perhaps government will put missing persons reports on them, or government mandated reminders of what it means to be a good citizen! So many useful applications!</p></div><p>I can wait.</p><p>While factory food is standard, and large processes and labs are well equipped to measure all you want to know - each batch of fruit has a different nutritional value. A little more sun can do a lot. There is a wide variation in the amount of vitamins in apples.</p><p>The costs associated with all the measurements of what you propose are immense.</p><p>Also, fruits have very few (none) added sugars or added other components... and there is no trickery.</p><p>Just remember: fruit is healthy. It never hurts to eat it. Why have a label if this is true anyway?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait til they 're required by law to give us all the nutritional information of every piece of fruit , down to the calorie count and the chemical breakdown .
Perhaps government will put missing persons reports on them , or government mandated reminders of what it means to be a good citizen !
So many useful applications ! I can wait.While factory food is standard , and large processes and labs are well equipped to measure all you want to know - each batch of fruit has a different nutritional value .
A little more sun can do a lot .
There is a wide variation in the amount of vitamins in apples.The costs associated with all the measurements of what you propose are immense.Also , fruits have very few ( none ) added sugars or added other components... and there is no trickery.Just remember : fruit is healthy .
It never hurts to eat it .
Why have a label if this is true anyway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait til they're required by law to give us all the nutritional information of every piece of fruit, down to the calorie count and the chemical breakdown.
Perhaps government will put missing persons reports on them, or government mandated reminders of what it means to be a good citizen!
So many useful applications!I can wait.While factory food is standard, and large processes and labs are well equipped to measure all you want to know - each batch of fruit has a different nutritional value.
A little more sun can do a lot.
There is a wide variation in the amount of vitamins in apples.The costs associated with all the measurements of what you propose are immense.Also, fruits have very few (none) added sugars or added other components... and there is no trickery.Just remember: fruit is healthy.
It never hurts to eat it.
Why have a label if this is true anyway?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995392</id>
	<title>Bitten into a label?</title>
	<author>BlackSnake112</author>
	<datestamp>1257439380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who eats something without looking at it first? Even the blind people that I have seen feel over over the fruit before eating it. How many people eat the skin of an orange, grapefruit, or banana? I don't eat the skin of an apple either but I am in the minority in that I think.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who eats something without looking at it first ?
Even the blind people that I have seen feel over over the fruit before eating it .
How many people eat the skin of an orange , grapefruit , or banana ?
I do n't eat the skin of an apple either but I am in the minority in that I think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who eats something without looking at it first?
Even the blind people that I have seen feel over over the fruit before eating it.
How many people eat the skin of an orange, grapefruit, or banana?
I don't eat the skin of an apple either but I am in the minority in that I think.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993892</id>
	<title>Never.</title>
	<author>nmg196</author>
	<datestamp>1257431640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?</p><p>Never. Not a single time. Unless you eat fruit in the dark, or are blind, this simply never happens and this is a solution looking for a problem.<br>Personally I think it makes the fruit itself somehow artificial and unappealing. I doubt this will ever catch on. I'd rather eat one that hasn't been maimed - it will also look nicer in the fruit bowl without the skin-spam.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you 're also chomping on a sticker label ? Never .
Not a single time .
Unless you eat fruit in the dark , or are blind , this simply never happens and this is a solution looking for a problem.Personally I think it makes the fruit itself somehow artificial and unappealing .
I doubt this will ever catch on .
I 'd rather eat one that has n't been maimed - it will also look nicer in the fruit bowl without the skin-spam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?Never.
Not a single time.
Unless you eat fruit in the dark, or are blind, this simply never happens and this is a solution looking for a problem.Personally I think it makes the fruit itself somehow artificial and unappealing.
I doubt this will ever catch on.
I'd rather eat one that hasn't been maimed - it will also look nicer in the fruit bowl without the skin-spam.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998096</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds good unless..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257452040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pathogens. FFS, eat the apple and quit yer bitchin'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pathogens .
FFS , eat the apple and quit yer bitchin' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pathogens.
FFS, eat the apple and quit yer bitchin'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30004400</id>
	<title>Stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257510840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><em>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?</em>
<p>uhh, never because i don't eat fruit in the dark? WTF?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you 're also chomping on a sticker label ?
uhh , never because i do n't eat fruit in the dark ?
WTF ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?
uhh, never because i don't eat fruit in the dark?
WTF?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29997692</id>
	<title>Something Useful</title>
	<author>ELitwin</author>
	<datestamp>1257450480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they could etch something onto the fruit that indicated its ripeness/flavor (by changing color), that would be exciting.
Except for bananas, I am pretty lousy at doing this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they could etch something onto the fruit that indicated its ripeness/flavor ( by changing color ) , that would be exciting .
Except for bananas , I am pretty lousy at doing this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they could etch something onto the fruit that indicated its ripeness/flavor (by changing color), that would be exciting.
Except for bananas, I am pretty lousy at doing this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994554</id>
	<title>Completely necessary</title>
	<author>Twyst3d</author>
	<datestamp>1257435180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because grapefruit is a fruit you bite into?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because grapefruit is a fruit you bite into ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because grapefruit is a fruit you bite into?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995610</id>
	<title>Re:Or... Don't label it on the fruit at all!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257440520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean the people that work in the supermarkets know what the difference is between various fruits? They apparently haven't gotten that straight here 'cause they need a code to tell them that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean the people that work in the supermarkets know what the difference is between various fruits ?
They apparently have n't gotten that straight here 'cause they need a code to tell them that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean the people that work in the supermarkets know what the difference is between various fruits?
They apparently haven't gotten that straight here 'cause they need a code to tell them that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30001422</id>
	<title>Re:An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>Five Bucks!</author>
	<datestamp>1257423660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can give me spots on my apples but leave me the birds and the bees, please.</p><p>Blemish-free is pesticide-rich<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can give me spots on my apples but leave me the birds and the bees , please.Blemish-free is pesticide-rich ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can give me spots on my apples but leave me the birds and the bees, please.Blemish-free is pesticide-rich ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994540</id>
	<title>Re:An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>Anonymusing</author>
	<datestamp>1257435120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?"</i> <br><br>
Erm, never? Because I always wash my fruits (as in apples, pears) first before eating them?</p></div></blockquote><p>Even stupider, they're talking about laser etching on <b>citrus fruit</b>.  You <b>peel</b> those fruits before you eat them (well, most people do). <b>There are no stickers inside the fruit.</b></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you 're also chomping on a sticker label ?
" Erm , never ?
Because I always wash my fruits ( as in apples , pears ) first before eating them ? Even stupider , they 're talking about laser etching on citrus fruit .
You peel those fruits before you eat them ( well , most people do ) .
There are no stickers inside the fruit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?
" 
Erm, never?
Because I always wash my fruits (as in apples, pears) first before eating them?Even stupider, they're talking about laser etching on citrus fruit.
You peel those fruits before you eat them (well, most people do).
There are no stickers inside the fruit.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30001766</id>
	<title>Tan line</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257426540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In China they put a stencil on their apples, let it get sun kissed and remove the stencil. Kind of like a cute heart tan line that you can get in a tanning booth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In China they put a stencil on their apples , let it get sun kissed and remove the stencil .
Kind of like a cute heart tan line that you can get in a tanning booth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In China they put a stencil on their apples, let it get sun kissed and remove the stencil.
Kind of like a cute heart tan line that you can get in a tanning booth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996566</id>
	<title>Re:And you think it will just be for labeling?</title>
	<author>ojintoad</author>
	<datestamp>1257445020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>ala Alice in Wonderland - make it say "Eat me."</htmltext>
<tokenext>ala Alice in Wonderland - make it say " Eat me .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ala Alice in Wonderland - make it say "Eat me.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30002640</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257435720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I'm waiting for the mandatory notice that the laser-charred fruit contains substances known in the state of California to cause cancer.</i> </p><p>Proposition 65 is the biggest joke ever pulled in CA. Compliance consists entirely of posting a sign at each entrance saying words to the effect that, "We got some shit in here that could kill you or cause you to have three-headed babies" and you're good to go. No listing of chemicals; no specificity at all. In effect, no way to figure out if there's actually anything you know could be dangerous to you personally. You'd be a fool to own a business and not slap one of these signs at the entrance, even if you only sell bottled water and accept credit cards for payment.</p><p>I've got them on my front and back doors just in case I blow a fart while someone is visiting. They've been warned and I'm in compliance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for the mandatory notice that the laser-charred fruit contains substances known in the state of California to cause cancer .
Proposition 65 is the biggest joke ever pulled in CA .
Compliance consists entirely of posting a sign at each entrance saying words to the effect that , " We got some shit in here that could kill you or cause you to have three-headed babies " and you 're good to go .
No listing of chemicals ; no specificity at all .
In effect , no way to figure out if there 's actually anything you know could be dangerous to you personally .
You 'd be a fool to own a business and not slap one of these signs at the entrance , even if you only sell bottled water and accept credit cards for payment.I 've got them on my front and back doors just in case I blow a fart while someone is visiting .
They 've been warned and I 'm in compliance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting for the mandatory notice that the laser-charred fruit contains substances known in the state of California to cause cancer.
Proposition 65 is the biggest joke ever pulled in CA.
Compliance consists entirely of posting a sign at each entrance saying words to the effect that, "We got some shit in here that could kill you or cause you to have three-headed babies" and you're good to go.
No listing of chemicals; no specificity at all.
In effect, no way to figure out if there's actually anything you know could be dangerous to you personally.
You'd be a fool to own a business and not slap one of these signs at the entrance, even if you only sell bottled water and accept credit cards for payment.I've got them on my front and back doors just in case I blow a fart while someone is visiting.
They've been warned and I'm in compliance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29997124</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257447780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I say we should brand the fruits like cows...<br>with a hot iron marker...<br>that way noone can complain about eating<br>irradiated fruit or something<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I say we should brand the fruits like cows...with a hot iron marker...that way noone can complain about eatingirradiated fruit or something : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I say we should brand the fruits like cows...with a hot iron marker...that way noone can complain about eatingirradiated fruit or something :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994564</id>
	<title>Great...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257435240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1) laser etch advertisings on fruits<br>2) ???<br>3) Profit!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) laser etch advertisings on fruits2 ) ? ?
? 3 ) Profit ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) laser etch advertisings on fruits2) ??
?3) Profit!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994746</id>
	<title>Supermarkets should be happy...</title>
	<author>TheGreatOrangePeel</author>
	<datestamp>1257436080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This aught to make supermarkets happy as it's bound to cut down on the number of cashiers entering organic produce (e.g. 94011 - organic bananas, 94664 - organic vine tomatoes) as regular, less expensive, produce (4011 - bananas, 4664 vine tomatoes).</htmltext>
<tokenext>This aught to make supermarkets happy as it 's bound to cut down on the number of cashiers entering organic produce ( e.g .
94011 - organic bananas , 94664 - organic vine tomatoes ) as regular , less expensive , produce ( 4011 - bananas , 4664 vine tomatoes ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This aught to make supermarkets happy as it's bound to cut down on the number of cashiers entering organic produce (e.g.
94011 - organic bananas, 94664 - organic vine tomatoes) as regular, less expensive, produce (4011 - bananas, 4664 vine tomatoes).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995668</id>
	<title>Re:An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257440820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm a practising homosexual you insensitive clod!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a practising homosexual you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a practising homosexual you insensitive clod!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996834</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257446280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd imagine the burning will produce *some* carcinogens (but then so would digesting a piece of plastic label).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd imagine the burning will produce * some * carcinogens ( but then so would digesting a piece of plastic label ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd imagine the burning will produce *some* carcinogens (but then so would digesting a piece of plastic label).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994250</id>
	<title>Re:An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>Idbar</author>
	<datestamp>1257433560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?" <br>
Do you mean grapefruits?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you 're also chomping on a sticker label ?
" Do you mean grapefruits ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?
" 
Do you mean grapefruits?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993956</id>
	<title>Dear /. editors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257431880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anybody know how <a href="http://slashdot.org/submission/1091087/Laser-tattoos-for-labelling-fruit" title="slashdot.org">submissions</a> [slashdot.org] are processed for acceptance? I guess it's nice to see the story finally made it, even if someone else had to submit it again almost a month later.<p><div class="quote"><p>arielCo writes <em>"Those helpful-yet-annoying little stickers on fruits that tell the cashier the variety and brand may be <a href="http://www.physorg.com/news170927623.html" title="physorg.com">replaced with a CO2 laser etching</a> [physorg.com]. Quoth the PhysOrg article: "the laser cauterizes the peel, much like when a laser is used on human skin. The cauterized area is impenetrable to pathogens and decay organisms and resists water loss". Demonstrated on a grapefruit, it is due for testing on "tomatoes, avocado and other citrus fruits". The original paper <a href="http://horttech.ashspublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/3/504" title="ashspublications.org">(abstract)</a> [ashspublications.org] requires a paid subscription."</em></p> </div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anybody know how submissions [ slashdot.org ] are processed for acceptance ?
I guess it 's nice to see the story finally made it , even if someone else had to submit it again almost a month later.arielCo writes " Those helpful-yet-annoying little stickers on fruits that tell the cashier the variety and brand may be replaced with a CO2 laser etching [ physorg.com ] .
Quoth the PhysOrg article : " the laser cauterizes the peel , much like when a laser is used on human skin .
The cauterized area is impenetrable to pathogens and decay organisms and resists water loss " .
Demonstrated on a grapefruit , it is due for testing on " tomatoes , avocado and other citrus fruits " .
The original paper ( abstract ) [ ashspublications.org ] requires a paid subscription .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anybody know how submissions [slashdot.org] are processed for acceptance?
I guess it's nice to see the story finally made it, even if someone else had to submit it again almost a month later.arielCo writes "Those helpful-yet-annoying little stickers on fruits that tell the cashier the variety and brand may be replaced with a CO2 laser etching [physorg.com].
Quoth the PhysOrg article: "the laser cauterizes the peel, much like when a laser is used on human skin.
The cauterized area is impenetrable to pathogens and decay organisms and resists water loss".
Demonstrated on a grapefruit, it is due for testing on "tomatoes, avocado and other citrus fruits".
The original paper (abstract) [ashspublications.org] requires a paid subscription.
" 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30000200</id>
	<title>Really?</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1257417660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>hope that it will be used in Florida's massive grapefruit industry.</p></div><p>I wouldn't have thought there'd be much of a market for massive grapefruit. I mean, I like grapefruit, but the regular size is plenty to eat for breakfast.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>hope that it will be used in Florida 's massive grapefruit industry.I would n't have thought there 'd be much of a market for massive grapefruit .
I mean , I like grapefruit , but the regular size is plenty to eat for breakfast .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hope that it will be used in Florida's massive grapefruit industry.I wouldn't have thought there'd be much of a market for massive grapefruit.
I mean, I like grapefruit, but the regular size is plenty to eat for breakfast.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994288</id>
	<title>Re:An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257433740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once my friends made smoothies, and we only found out that they had forgotten to take the label off when one of them almost drank it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once my friends made smoothies , and we only found out that they had forgotten to take the label off when one of them almost drank it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once my friends made smoothies, and we only found out that they had forgotten to take the label off when one of them almost drank it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995058</id>
	<title>Finally....</title>
	<author>DieByWire</author>
	<datestamp>1257437760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Researchers...hope that it will be used in Florida's massive grapefruit industry.</i> </p><p>This is huge. I can't tell you how much I hate accidentally eating the label on grapefruit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you 're also chomping on a sticker label ?
... Researchers...hope that it will be used in Florida 's massive grapefruit industry .
This is huge .
I ca n't tell you how much I hate accidentally eating the label on grapefruit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?
... Researchers...hope that it will be used in Florida's massive grapefruit industry.
This is huge.
I can't tell you how much I hate accidentally eating the label on grapefruit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993802</id>
	<title>Good Luck...</title>
	<author>LordofEntropy</author>
	<datestamp>1257431160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>with getting the sharks focused on labeling produce.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>with getting the sharks focused on labeling produce .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>with getting the sharks focused on labeling produce.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30002162</id>
	<title>Re:An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257430440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope you are washing them with soap then.  Modern pesticides are designed to resist the effects of simple water (don't want them washing away with the rain).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope you are washing them with soap then .
Modern pesticides are designed to resist the effects of simple water ( do n't want them washing away with the rain ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope you are washing them with soap then.
Modern pesticides are designed to resist the effects of simple water (don't want them washing away with the rain).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993898</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1257431640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm waiting for the mandatory notice that the laser-charred fruit contains substances known in the state of California to cause cancer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for the mandatory notice that the laser-charred fruit contains substances known in the state of California to cause cancer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting for the mandatory notice that the laser-charred fruit contains substances known in the state of California to cause cancer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994352</id>
	<title>Re:Dude</title>
	<author>xtracto</author>
	<datestamp>1257434100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's because the only people that comment is to beach and moan about the story. Those others who think it is cool will read the summary or maaaaaaybe read the story and skip to the next item in slashdot (which, if they find stupid, then they will comment about it)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's because the only people that comment is to beach and moan about the story .
Those others who think it is cool will read the summary or maaaaaaybe read the story and skip to the next item in slashdot ( which , if they find stupid , then they will comment about it )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's because the only people that comment is to beach and moan about the story.
Those others who think it is cool will read the summary or maaaaaaybe read the story and skip to the next item in slashdot (which, if they find stupid, then they will comment about it)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993884</id>
	<title>And you think it will just be for labeling?</title>
	<author>hyades1</author>
	<datestamp>1257431580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Once this is in use, I don't imagine it will be long before your fruit is covered with more ads than a NASCAR racing suit.  On the up-side, the opportunities for a bit of creative pranking are just about limitless. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once this is in use , I do n't imagine it will be long before your fruit is covered with more ads than a NASCAR racing suit .
On the up-side , the opportunities for a bit of creative pranking are just about limitless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Once this is in use, I don't imagine it will be long before your fruit is covered with more ads than a NASCAR racing suit.
On the up-side, the opportunities for a bit of creative pranking are just about limitless. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993748</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257430860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It just burns it with a laser, 100\% safe to eat. The problem that I heard with this tech is it almost always made it rot faster, but I think they were doing it to apples when I read it which has thin skin, not as much of a problem with citrus fruit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It just burns it with a laser , 100 \ % safe to eat .
The problem that I heard with this tech is it almost always made it rot faster , but I think they were doing it to apples when I read it which has thin skin , not as much of a problem with citrus fruit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It just burns it with a laser, 100\% safe to eat.
The problem that I heard with this tech is it almost always made it rot faster, but I think they were doing it to apples when I read it which has thin skin, not as much of a problem with citrus fruit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994454</id>
	<title>Re:Won't help - produce codes</title>
	<author>nate\_in\_ME</author>
	<datestamp>1257434640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not the case, at least from my experience...

At several stores I've shopped and/or worked at, both in the midwest and New England, bananas, for example, have always been PLU code 4011.  Most others have been the same as well, except, for example, in specialty items that are not available everywhere.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not the case , at least from my experience.. . At several stores I 've shopped and/or worked at , both in the midwest and New England , bananas , for example , have always been PLU code 4011 .
Most others have been the same as well , except , for example , in specialty items that are not available everywhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not the case, at least from my experience...

At several stores I've shopped and/or worked at, both in the midwest and New England, bananas, for example, have always been PLU code 4011.
Most others have been the same as well, except, for example, in specialty items that are not available everywhere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995842</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257441540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It adds a little energy to the skin, which causes the water to heat up and change color.</p><p>It's pretty basic IR LASER stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It adds a little energy to the skin , which causes the water to heat up and change color.It 's pretty basic IR LASER stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It adds a little energy to the skin, which causes the water to heat up and change color.It's pretty basic IR LASER stuff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998938</id>
	<title>Re:Won't help - produce codes</title>
	<author>plague3106</author>
	<datestamp>1257412440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the US, produce codes are standardized.  4011 is always banana.  94011 is an organic banana.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the US , produce codes are standardized .
4011 is always banana .
94011 is an organic banana .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the US, produce codes are standardized.
4011 is always banana.
94011 is an organic banana.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994962</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong problem</title>
	<author>OrangeTide</author>
	<datestamp>1257437280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The labels aren't advertisements. they have a 4 or 5 digit code on them which is used to identify what kind of fruit it is specifically. The prices for honeycrisp apples is different from fugi apples which is different from gala apples (the price difference is pretty large between different varieties). The clerks at the store aren't knowledgeable enough to tell the different of the 10 or so varieties of each kind of fruit sold to tell the difference. With the abundance found in wealthy nations comes a way to organize that abundance, and keeping things organized is what those labels are all about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The labels are n't advertisements .
they have a 4 or 5 digit code on them which is used to identify what kind of fruit it is specifically .
The prices for honeycrisp apples is different from fugi apples which is different from gala apples ( the price difference is pretty large between different varieties ) .
The clerks at the store are n't knowledgeable enough to tell the different of the 10 or so varieties of each kind of fruit sold to tell the difference .
With the abundance found in wealthy nations comes a way to organize that abundance , and keeping things organized is what those labels are all about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The labels aren't advertisements.
they have a 4 or 5 digit code on them which is used to identify what kind of fruit it is specifically.
The prices for honeycrisp apples is different from fugi apples which is different from gala apples (the price difference is pretty large between different varieties).
The clerks at the store aren't knowledgeable enough to tell the different of the 10 or so varieties of each kind of fruit sold to tell the difference.
With the abundance found in wealthy nations comes a way to organize that abundance, and keeping things organized is what those labels are all about.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995698</id>
	<title>What I can't figure out...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257440940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is how they're going to train the sharks to do the writing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is how they 're going to train the sharks to do the writing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is how they're going to train the sharks to do the writing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29999656</id>
	<title>Re:Or... Don't label it on the fruit at all!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257415320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They aren't always sold in a box.</p><p>If you hand the checkout lady a bag of loose fruit, there has to be some way for her to figure out which variety of apples they are (they might be differently priced).</p><p>Of course male checkers will just say "apple, durr, which code for apple do I first happen to see on this chart".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are n't always sold in a box.If you hand the checkout lady a bag of loose fruit , there has to be some way for her to figure out which variety of apples they are ( they might be differently priced ) .Of course male checkers will just say " apple , durr , which code for apple do I first happen to see on this chart " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They aren't always sold in a box.If you hand the checkout lady a bag of loose fruit, there has to be some way for her to figure out which variety of apples they are (they might be differently priced).Of course male checkers will just say "apple, durr, which code for apple do I first happen to see on this chart".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994478</id>
	<title>Re:Won't help - produce codes</title>
	<author>LMacG</author>
	<datestamp>1257434700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, bananas (non-organic) are 4011 from California to the New York island, From the Redwood Forest to the Gulf Stream waters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , bananas ( non-organic ) are 4011 from California to the New York island , From the Redwood Forest to the Gulf Stream waters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, bananas (non-organic) are 4011 from California to the New York island, From the Redwood Forest to the Gulf Stream waters.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994532</id>
	<title>How many times?</title>
	<author>j00r0m4nc3r</author>
	<datestamp>1257435060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Zero.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Zero .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Zero.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996714</id>
	<title>CARBON DIOXIDE LASER!!!!!!</title>
	<author>char70ger</author>
	<datestamp>1257445740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What is the carbon foot print of these co2 lasers? How much carbon is used to process the paper sticker compared to the laser etching?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) Not that I care, but this will be raised by the climate change folks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is the carbon foot print of these co2 lasers ?
How much carbon is used to process the paper sticker compared to the laser etching ?
: ) Not that I care , but this will be raised by the climate change folks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is the carbon foot print of these co2 lasers?
How much carbon is used to process the paper sticker compared to the laser etching?
:) Not that I care, but this will be raised by the climate change folks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995246</id>
	<title>Re:Solving nothing, there is no problem</title>
	<author>hotkey</author>
	<datestamp>1257438720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll give you bananas (we have only the 'regular' ones and the 'organic' variety, whatever that means).    However, my grocery store probably has more than ten varieties of apples.  I'm quite happy that most of them are labeled with a number that the scanning drone can input directly in the cash register.  Quicker, less error prone, and probably easier than having to learn or look-up the code for all the different fruits (what the heck is a durian?)  Etched bar code or numbers would be ever nicer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll give you bananas ( we have only the 'regular ' ones and the 'organic ' variety , whatever that means ) .
However , my grocery store probably has more than ten varieties of apples .
I 'm quite happy that most of them are labeled with a number that the scanning drone can input directly in the cash register .
Quicker , less error prone , and probably easier than having to learn or look-up the code for all the different fruits ( what the heck is a durian ?
) Etched bar code or numbers would be ever nicer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll give you bananas (we have only the 'regular' ones and the 'organic' variety, whatever that means).
However, my grocery store probably has more than ten varieties of apples.
I'm quite happy that most of them are labeled with a number that the scanning drone can input directly in the cash register.
Quicker, less error prone, and probably easier than having to learn or look-up the code for all the different fruits (what the heck is a durian?
)  Etched bar code or numbers would be ever nicer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995256</id>
	<title>Deep Thoughts</title>
	<author>operagost</author>
	<datestamp>1257438720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>As I bit into the nectarine, it had a crisp juiciness that I found pleasurable... until I realized that it wasn't a nectarine at all, but a human head.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As I bit into the nectarine , it had a crisp juiciness that I found pleasurable... until I realized that it was n't a nectarine at all , but a human head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I bit into the nectarine, it had a crisp juiciness that I found pleasurable... until I realized that it wasn't a nectarine at all, but a human head.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29999472</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1257414540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Don't get confused by the obviously wrong image that came with TFS. (Cyan? Really?? FAIL!)</p></div><p>That picture isn't just something the Slashdot editor went out and found. It's actually from TFA, believe it or not.</p><p>However, I agree with you. The lemons just turned brown, as I'd expect. Green? That's ink (it's a grapefruit, so nobody eats the skin anyway). Why did they even use that image?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't get confused by the obviously wrong image that came with TFS .
( Cyan ? Really ? ?
FAIL ! ) That picture is n't just something the Slashdot editor went out and found .
It 's actually from TFA , believe it or not.However , I agree with you .
The lemons just turned brown , as I 'd expect .
Green ? That 's ink ( it 's a grapefruit , so nobody eats the skin anyway ) .
Why did they even use that image ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't get confused by the obviously wrong image that came with TFS.
(Cyan? Really??
FAIL!)That picture isn't just something the Slashdot editor went out and found.
It's actually from TFA, believe it or not.However, I agree with you.
The lemons just turned brown, as I'd expect.
Green? That's ink (it's a grapefruit, so nobody eats the skin anyway).
Why did they even use that image?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996476</id>
	<title>Re:Dude</title>
	<author>amplt1337</author>
	<datestamp>1257444600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Arrogant tech nerds (myself included) are often suspicious of change.  There's something just so satisfying about being able to say "Nuh uh, you're wrong!" or otherwise indulge in world-weary cynicism.</p><p>Besides, I like to think of Slashdot as being populated almost entirely by Andy Rooney.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Arrogant tech nerds ( myself included ) are often suspicious of change .
There 's something just so satisfying about being able to say " Nuh uh , you 're wrong !
" or otherwise indulge in world-weary cynicism.Besides , I like to think of Slashdot as being populated almost entirely by Andy Rooney .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Arrogant tech nerds (myself included) are often suspicious of change.
There's something just so satisfying about being able to say "Nuh uh, you're wrong!
" or otherwise indulge in world-weary cynicism.Besides, I like to think of Slashdot as being populated almost entirely by Andy Rooney.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996886</id>
	<title>Re:Dude</title>
	<author>businessnerd</author>
	<datestamp>1257446640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've noticed this here myself and after thinking about it, it makes perfect sense.  You see, there is a perception amongst the general population that nerds/geeks are early adopters of technology because nerds love technology so obviously we're going to be the first to adopt.  However, nerds also tend to be very practical and we generally would know more about what the new technology does, and what is already out there (that others may not yet know of).  So our practicality tells us that before we adopt new technology, that technology needs to be proven to us (exception being for those developing the new technology).  We are smart enough to know what happens when you adopt a technology before its proven.  You spend a lot of money on something that under delivers and maybe even disapears or is replaced soon by something better.  Or maybe it was just never a good idea to begin with.  Mini-discs come to mind as a technology that briefly filled a gap until CD-Rs and mp3 players were ready and accessible to the consumer.  And that segways perfectly to my other point, that nerds are more aware of what else is on the horizon.  For me, I'm hesitant to make my MythTV DVR ready for HD, when I feel the better solution is an internet streaming tv model like what Boxee is trying to do.  We didn't buy the mini-disc because we knew that CD-R was out there, it just needed time for the costs to come down, so why spend money on mini-disc, when a more lasting technology is almost ready.</p><p>Or maybe we're all just cheap at heart and know that with a little extra ingenuity, we can get the same benefit that this new technology offers without spending any money.</p><p>But maybe the real reason is that we are all too smart for our own good.  We're too skeptical.  Maybe we're the only ones learning from Man's mistakes.  Everything is too good to be true, so we have to think and analyze and try to poke as many holes in the technology until it is proven that its impenetrable.</p><p>Or is it that new technology, in this 21st centuraly society, is now trendy, and when have nerds and geeks ever been trendy.  I guess it is our curse.  As soon as our own interests become trendy, we're no longer interested in them.  Just wait, everyone will be using Linux, Anime will be on primetime TV, and all the popular girls want to date the president of the chess club.  But where will all the nerds be, well, we will have moved on to evangalizing the next great OS that only works if you're a real techy, downloading Danish animation that makes Japanese tentacle porn look childish, and forming a professional Quidditch league complete with nuclear powered brooms.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've noticed this here myself and after thinking about it , it makes perfect sense .
You see , there is a perception amongst the general population that nerds/geeks are early adopters of technology because nerds love technology so obviously we 're going to be the first to adopt .
However , nerds also tend to be very practical and we generally would know more about what the new technology does , and what is already out there ( that others may not yet know of ) .
So our practicality tells us that before we adopt new technology , that technology needs to be proven to us ( exception being for those developing the new technology ) .
We are smart enough to know what happens when you adopt a technology before its proven .
You spend a lot of money on something that under delivers and maybe even disapears or is replaced soon by something better .
Or maybe it was just never a good idea to begin with .
Mini-discs come to mind as a technology that briefly filled a gap until CD-Rs and mp3 players were ready and accessible to the consumer .
And that segways perfectly to my other point , that nerds are more aware of what else is on the horizon .
For me , I 'm hesitant to make my MythTV DVR ready for HD , when I feel the better solution is an internet streaming tv model like what Boxee is trying to do .
We did n't buy the mini-disc because we knew that CD-R was out there , it just needed time for the costs to come down , so why spend money on mini-disc , when a more lasting technology is almost ready.Or maybe we 're all just cheap at heart and know that with a little extra ingenuity , we can get the same benefit that this new technology offers without spending any money.But maybe the real reason is that we are all too smart for our own good .
We 're too skeptical .
Maybe we 're the only ones learning from Man 's mistakes .
Everything is too good to be true , so we have to think and analyze and try to poke as many holes in the technology until it is proven that its impenetrable.Or is it that new technology , in this 21st centuraly society , is now trendy , and when have nerds and geeks ever been trendy .
I guess it is our curse .
As soon as our own interests become trendy , we 're no longer interested in them .
Just wait , everyone will be using Linux , Anime will be on primetime TV , and all the popular girls want to date the president of the chess club .
But where will all the nerds be , well , we will have moved on to evangalizing the next great OS that only works if you 're a real techy , downloading Danish animation that makes Japanese tentacle porn look childish , and forming a professional Quidditch league complete with nuclear powered brooms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've noticed this here myself and after thinking about it, it makes perfect sense.
You see, there is a perception amongst the general population that nerds/geeks are early adopters of technology because nerds love technology so obviously we're going to be the first to adopt.
However, nerds also tend to be very practical and we generally would know more about what the new technology does, and what is already out there (that others may not yet know of).
So our practicality tells us that before we adopt new technology, that technology needs to be proven to us (exception being for those developing the new technology).
We are smart enough to know what happens when you adopt a technology before its proven.
You spend a lot of money on something that under delivers and maybe even disapears or is replaced soon by something better.
Or maybe it was just never a good idea to begin with.
Mini-discs come to mind as a technology that briefly filled a gap until CD-Rs and mp3 players were ready and accessible to the consumer.
And that segways perfectly to my other point, that nerds are more aware of what else is on the horizon.
For me, I'm hesitant to make my MythTV DVR ready for HD, when I feel the better solution is an internet streaming tv model like what Boxee is trying to do.
We didn't buy the mini-disc because we knew that CD-R was out there, it just needed time for the costs to come down, so why spend money on mini-disc, when a more lasting technology is almost ready.Or maybe we're all just cheap at heart and know that with a little extra ingenuity, we can get the same benefit that this new technology offers without spending any money.But maybe the real reason is that we are all too smart for our own good.
We're too skeptical.
Maybe we're the only ones learning from Man's mistakes.
Everything is too good to be true, so we have to think and analyze and try to poke as many holes in the technology until it is proven that its impenetrable.Or is it that new technology, in this 21st centuraly society, is now trendy, and when have nerds and geeks ever been trendy.
I guess it is our curse.
As soon as our own interests become trendy, we're no longer interested in them.
Just wait, everyone will be using Linux, Anime will be on primetime TV, and all the popular girls want to date the president of the chess club.
But where will all the nerds be, well, we will have moved on to evangalizing the next great OS that only works if you're a real techy, downloading Danish animation that makes Japanese tentacle porn look childish, and forming a professional Quidditch league complete with nuclear powered brooms.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994428</id>
	<title>Re:Dude</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257434400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>browncoats always peel their fruit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>browncoats always peel their fruit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>browncoats always peel their fruit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995412</id>
	<title>Re:Dude</title>
	<author>ChromeAeonium</author>
	<datestamp>1257439500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've noticed that being technologically savvy or skeptical about one thing doesn't always translate well into other fields.  I've seen people say that naturopathy is nonsense because natural doesn't mean beneficial, then almost in the same sentence praise organic food because it is natural and therefore better.  Look at Bill Maher criticize creationism as unscientific, then spew fearmongering about medical science and support magic based alternative medicines.  People, in general, don't seem to be good at applying one standard set of reasoning to everything they encounter.  I'm kinda surprised when I see someone on this site exhibit technophobia or praise pseudoscience (like as seen in today's dowsing article), but at the same time I also expect it.  Food is one area where this appears to be especially true.  Expect this laser etching thing to cause cancer (or some other disease of the day).  Well, it won't really cause cancer, but some forwarded email will claim it, then some luddite quack will provide supporting evidence for it (based on a study with a sample size of 3), and we'll have another 'controversial' technique that 'they' are using to impurify our precious bodily fluids.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've noticed that being technologically savvy or skeptical about one thing does n't always translate well into other fields .
I 've seen people say that naturopathy is nonsense because natural does n't mean beneficial , then almost in the same sentence praise organic food because it is natural and therefore better .
Look at Bill Maher criticize creationism as unscientific , then spew fearmongering about medical science and support magic based alternative medicines .
People , in general , do n't seem to be good at applying one standard set of reasoning to everything they encounter .
I 'm kinda surprised when I see someone on this site exhibit technophobia or praise pseudoscience ( like as seen in today 's dowsing article ) , but at the same time I also expect it .
Food is one area where this appears to be especially true .
Expect this laser etching thing to cause cancer ( or some other disease of the day ) .
Well , it wo n't really cause cancer , but some forwarded email will claim it , then some luddite quack will provide supporting evidence for it ( based on a study with a sample size of 3 ) , and we 'll have another 'controversial ' technique that 'they ' are using to impurify our precious bodily fluids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've noticed that being technologically savvy or skeptical about one thing doesn't always translate well into other fields.
I've seen people say that naturopathy is nonsense because natural doesn't mean beneficial, then almost in the same sentence praise organic food because it is natural and therefore better.
Look at Bill Maher criticize creationism as unscientific, then spew fearmongering about medical science and support magic based alternative medicines.
People, in general, don't seem to be good at applying one standard set of reasoning to everything they encounter.
I'm kinda surprised when I see someone on this site exhibit technophobia or praise pseudoscience (like as seen in today's dowsing article), but at the same time I also expect it.
Food is one area where this appears to be especially true.
Expect this laser etching thing to cause cancer (or some other disease of the day).
Well, it won't really cause cancer, but some forwarded email will claim it, then some luddite quack will provide supporting evidence for it (based on a study with a sample size of 3), and we'll have another 'controversial' technique that 'they' are using to impurify our precious bodily fluids.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582</id>
	<title>What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257429720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>What chemical change is caused in the skin to form the pattern? How deep does it go? The skin is a protective barrier, and if it's compromised by the process, this could have a negative effect on shelf-life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What chemical change is caused in the skin to form the pattern ?
How deep does it go ?
The skin is a protective barrier , and if it 's compromised by the process , this could have a negative effect on shelf-life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What chemical change is caused in the skin to form the pattern?
How deep does it go?
The skin is a protective barrier, and if it's compromised by the process, this could have a negative effect on shelf-life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30000654</id>
	<title>wait... what?</title>
	<author>sglewis100</author>
	<datestamp>1257419760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?"</p></div><p>Umm... never? Seriously... are there legions of people biting into fruit and choking on stickers?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you 're also chomping on a sticker label ? " Umm.. .
never ? Seriously... are there legions of people biting into fruit and choking on stickers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?"Umm...
never? Seriously... are there legions of people biting into fruit and choking on stickers?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30011532</id>
	<title>anonymous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257514200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't bite into a grapefruit anyway......</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't bite into a grapefruit anyway..... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't bite into a grapefruit anyway......</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994320</id>
	<title>Pumpkin Decorating...OF THE FUTURE!</title>
	<author>AioKits</author>
	<datestamp>1257433920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This will make some awesome looking fruit/vegetable decorations if someone can get their hands on the laser.  Apples with smiley faces on them, make em festive looking.  Potatoes with cooking instructions.  Put numbers on em for vegetable racing, I dunno.  Just a few ideas...  Man we could have some fun with this laser.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This will make some awesome looking fruit/vegetable decorations if someone can get their hands on the laser .
Apples with smiley faces on them , make em festive looking .
Potatoes with cooking instructions .
Put numbers on em for vegetable racing , I dunno .
Just a few ideas... Man we could have some fun with this laser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will make some awesome looking fruit/vegetable decorations if someone can get their hands on the laser.
Apples with smiley faces on them, make em festive looking.
Potatoes with cooking instructions.
Put numbers on em for vegetable racing, I dunno.
Just a few ideas...  Man we could have some fun with this laser.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995748</id>
	<title>Re:Lecture Fruit!</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1257441180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Just remember: fruit is healthy. It never hurts to eat it. Why have a label if this is true anyway?</p><p>this statement is so wrong I'm going to have to disregard everything else you said.</p><p>Have you ever looked at the fat content of a Apple? or and Olive?<br>How about sugar?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Just remember : fruit is healthy .
It never hurts to eat it .
Why have a label if this is true anyway ? this statement is so wrong I 'm going to have to disregard everything else you said.Have you ever looked at the fat content of a Apple ?
or and Olive ? How about sugar ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Just remember: fruit is healthy.
It never hurts to eat it.
Why have a label if this is true anyway?this statement is so wrong I'm going to have to disregard everything else you said.Have you ever looked at the fat content of a Apple?
or and Olive?How about sugar?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30001762</id>
	<title>WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!</title>
	<author>KingTank</author>
	<datestamp>1257426480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Children love to peel the sticker off and stick it on their forehead.  I hate to think what children will be doing to their foreheads if this laser thing catches on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Children love to peel the sticker off and stick it on their forehead .
I hate to think what children will be doing to their foreheads if this laser thing catches on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Children love to peel the sticker off and stick it on their forehead.
I hate to think what children will be doing to their foreheads if this laser thing catches on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993930</id>
	<title>Sounds good unless..</title>
	<author>Magreger\_V</author>
	<datestamp>1257431760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds good as long as it doesn't compromise the foods shelf life in any way. The skin on fruits and vegetables is a barrier against pathogens. If the skin is broken or marked the fruit will spoil much faster.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds good as long as it does n't compromise the foods shelf life in any way .
The skin on fruits and vegetables is a barrier against pathogens .
If the skin is broken or marked the fruit will spoil much faster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds good as long as it doesn't compromise the foods shelf life in any way.
The skin on fruits and vegetables is a barrier against pathogens.
If the skin is broken or marked the fruit will spoil much faster.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995218</id>
	<title>Re:Solving nothing, there is no problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257438540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In addition, most fruits here don't even have a sticker. We're quite capable of distinguishing between a banana and an apple without sticker.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></div><p>Well, you've never met my wife</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In addition , most fruits here do n't even have a sticker .
We 're quite capable of distinguishing between a banana and an apple without sticker .
: DWell , you 've never met my wife</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In addition, most fruits here don't even have a sticker.
We're quite capable of distinguishing between a banana and an apple without sticker.
:DWell, you've never met my wife
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995298</id>
	<title>None</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1257438840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not an idiot.</p><p>Now ask me how many licks to the center of a tootsie pop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not an idiot.Now ask me how many licks to the center of a tootsie pop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not an idiot.Now ask me how many licks to the center of a tootsie pop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995972</id>
	<title>Re:Dude</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257442140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not anti-technology, but it certainly seems like overkill. What's wrong with printing / branding if you want to mark the skin rather than the fruit? No need for complex laser optics, just an iron or a stamp. Technology we've used and understood for years. In addition to that, if your selling point is that people don't like having to remove stickers, why the hell are you doing it to citrus fruit? They all have a skin that is removed before eating!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not anti-technology , but it certainly seems like overkill .
What 's wrong with printing / branding if you want to mark the skin rather than the fruit ?
No need for complex laser optics , just an iron or a stamp .
Technology we 've used and understood for years .
In addition to that , if your selling point is that people do n't like having to remove stickers , why the hell are you doing it to citrus fruit ?
They all have a skin that is removed before eating !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not anti-technology, but it certainly seems like overkill.
What's wrong with printing / branding if you want to mark the skin rather than the fruit?
No need for complex laser optics, just an iron or a stamp.
Technology we've used and understood for years.
In addition to that, if your selling point is that people don't like having to remove stickers, why the hell are you doing it to citrus fruit?
They all have a skin that is removed before eating!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30003416</id>
	<title>Re:Lecture Fruit!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257449580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nothing new about that.<br>The apple farmers here do that quite succesfully.<br>You can buy apples with hearts "engraved" in the skin, or any text you would like to have for a small fee. I had a friend who used to operate the laser. The downside is that each apple has to be manually polished before being lasered.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing new about that.The apple farmers here do that quite succesfully.You can buy apples with hearts " engraved " in the skin , or any text you would like to have for a small fee .
I had a friend who used to operate the laser .
The downside is that each apple has to be manually polished before being lasered .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing new about that.The apple farmers here do that quite succesfully.You can buy apples with hearts "engraved" in the skin, or any text you would like to have for a small fee.
I had a friend who used to operate the laser.
The downside is that each apple has to be manually polished before being lasered.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993794</id>
	<title>Solving nothing, there is no problem</title>
	<author>captainpanic</author>
	<datestamp>1257431100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?</p> </div><p>Answer: Never<br>They're quite easy to spot: they look like a little sticker label.<br>In addition, most fruits here don't even have a sticker. We're quite capable of distinguishing between a banana and an apple without sticker.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you 're also chomping on a sticker label ?
Answer : NeverThey 're quite easy to spot : they look like a little sticker label.In addition , most fruits here do n't even have a sticker .
We 're quite capable of distinguishing between a banana and an apple without sticker .
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?
Answer: NeverThey're quite easy to spot: they look like a little sticker label.In addition, most fruits here don't even have a sticker.
We're quite capable of distinguishing between a banana and an apple without sticker.
:D
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995678</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>Joe Snipe</author>
	<datestamp>1257440880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm waiting for the mandatory notice that the laser-charred fruit contains substances known in the state of California to cause cancer.</p></div><p>Will they laser-char it onto the fruit?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for the mandatory notice that the laser-charred fruit contains substances known in the state of California to cause cancer.Will they laser-char it onto the fruit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting for the mandatory notice that the laser-charred fruit contains substances known in the state of California to cause cancer.Will they laser-char it onto the fruit?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30003152</id>
	<title>Advertisements and art coming</title>
	<author>Boawk</author>
	<datestamp>1257444840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The labels aren't advertisements.</p></div><p>Ah, but I wouldn't be surprised if the nifty laser labeling leads to large advertisements on the fruits.  Or perhaps some entrepreneur will try to increase sales by lasering beautiful art or patterns on their fruit.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The labels are n't advertisements.Ah , but I would n't be surprised if the nifty laser labeling leads to large advertisements on the fruits .
Or perhaps some entrepreneur will try to increase sales by lasering beautiful art or patterns on their fruit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The labels aren't advertisements.Ah, but I wouldn't be surprised if the nifty laser labeling leads to large advertisements on the fruits.
Or perhaps some entrepreneur will try to increase sales by lasering beautiful art or patterns on their fruit.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995406</id>
	<title>Re:Lecture Fruit!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257439440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I can't wait til they're required by law to give us all the nutritional information of every piece of fruit, down to the calorie count and the chemical breakdown. Perhaps government will put missing persons reports on them, or government mandated reminders of what it means to be a good citizen! So many useful applications!</p></div><p>I know this is meant to be funny, but the parent poster is missing the point.  This technology is useful to the manufacturers for three reasons:</p><p>1. it is lower total cost than sticky labels<br>2. it makes it easier to custom label each shipment (Walmart gets its own SKU, Costco a different one, etc.) and to uniquely identify each processing batch<br>3. it opens up a HUGE new opportunity for advertising</p><p>The technology is only marginally useful to the consumer.  After all, we got by without labels of any sort on each piece of fruit for decades, no?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait til they 're required by law to give us all the nutritional information of every piece of fruit , down to the calorie count and the chemical breakdown .
Perhaps government will put missing persons reports on them , or government mandated reminders of what it means to be a good citizen !
So many useful applications ! I know this is meant to be funny , but the parent poster is missing the point .
This technology is useful to the manufacturers for three reasons : 1. it is lower total cost than sticky labels2 .
it makes it easier to custom label each shipment ( Walmart gets its own SKU , Costco a different one , etc .
) and to uniquely identify each processing batch3 .
it opens up a HUGE new opportunity for advertisingThe technology is only marginally useful to the consumer .
After all , we got by without labels of any sort on each piece of fruit for decades , no ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait til they're required by law to give us all the nutritional information of every piece of fruit, down to the calorie count and the chemical breakdown.
Perhaps government will put missing persons reports on them, or government mandated reminders of what it means to be a good citizen!
So many useful applications!I know this is meant to be funny, but the parent poster is missing the point.
This technology is useful to the manufacturers for three reasons:1. it is lower total cost than sticky labels2.
it makes it easier to custom label each shipment (Walmart gets its own SKU, Costco a different one, etc.
) and to uniquely identify each processing batch3.
it opens up a HUGE new opportunity for advertisingThe technology is only marginally useful to the consumer.
After all, we got by without labels of any sort on each piece of fruit for decades, no?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993870</id>
	<title>Long Run</title>
	<author>Demonantis</author>
	<datestamp>1257431520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Considering the amount of fruit that is produced in a given year, even though the stickers are really cheap. This system will probably pay for itself fairly quickly just by removing the cost of putting the stickers on. I suspect that once the FDA approves it we will be seeing it all over the market more for this reason then for the consumers. I'm excited because all the people that litter and paste them on things won't be able to anymore.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering the amount of fruit that is produced in a given year , even though the stickers are really cheap .
This system will probably pay for itself fairly quickly just by removing the cost of putting the stickers on .
I suspect that once the FDA approves it we will be seeing it all over the market more for this reason then for the consumers .
I 'm excited because all the people that litter and paste them on things wo n't be able to anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering the amount of fruit that is produced in a given year, even though the stickers are really cheap.
This system will probably pay for itself fairly quickly just by removing the cost of putting the stickers on.
I suspect that once the FDA approves it we will be seeing it all over the market more for this reason then for the consumers.
I'm excited because all the people that litter and paste them on things won't be able to anymore.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993564</id>
	<title>Wrong problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257429540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think they solved the wrong problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think they solved the wrong problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think they solved the wrong problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994374</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257434220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What chemical change is caused in the skin to form the pattern? How deep does it go? The skin is a protective barrier, and if it's compromised by the process, this could have a negative effect on shelf-life.</p></div><p>Do you worry about Swamp Vapors getting into your toothpaste? How about e-waves from the planet Marsupius?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What chemical change is caused in the skin to form the pattern ?
How deep does it go ?
The skin is a protective barrier , and if it 's compromised by the process , this could have a negative effect on shelf-life.Do you worry about Swamp Vapors getting into your toothpaste ?
How about e-waves from the planet Marsupius ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What chemical change is caused in the skin to form the pattern?
How deep does it go?
The skin is a protective barrier, and if it's compromised by the process, this could have a negative effect on shelf-life.Do you worry about Swamp Vapors getting into your toothpaste?
How about e-waves from the planet Marsupius?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996600</id>
	<title>Re:Or... Don't label it on the fruit at all!</title>
	<author>ArsenneLupin</author>
	<datestamp>1257445200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Actually that labelling on the fruit must be a US thing. They don't do it here in Denmark.</p></div><p>Here in Luxembourg, they do label fruit, but only one apple out of ten, or so. Or only one banana per hand.</p><p>
Although lately this has changed: we're seeing more and more apple crates where every single apple has a label, or hands of bananas where each finger has its own label...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually that labelling on the fruit must be a US thing .
They do n't do it here in Denmark.Here in Luxembourg , they do label fruit , but only one apple out of ten , or so .
Or only one banana per hand .
Although lately this has changed : we 're seeing more and more apple crates where every single apple has a label , or hands of bananas where each finger has its own label.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually that labelling on the fruit must be a US thing.
They don't do it here in Denmark.Here in Luxembourg, they do label fruit, but only one apple out of ten, or so.
Or only one banana per hand.
Although lately this has changed: we're seeing more and more apple crates where every single apple has a label, or hands of bananas where each finger has its own label...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993810</id>
	<title>Won't help - produce codes</title>
	<author>BriGal</author>
	<datestamp>1257431220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The etching may be all well and good for the brand names, but I believe most grocery stores use different produce codes. So the individual stores will still need to put stickers on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The etching may be all well and good for the brand names , but I believe most grocery stores use different produce codes .
So the individual stores will still need to put stickers on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The etching may be all well and good for the brand names, but I believe most grocery stores use different produce codes.
So the individual stores will still need to put stickers on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993972</id>
	<title>Re:An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>IBBoard</author>
	<datestamp>1257432000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Washing fruit? Pah, I just give apples a quick rub on my t-shirt and then bite it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>TBH it has been a long time since I last saw one with a label stuck on it, but maybe that's because I mainly get them at corporate lunches and from pre-picked bags rather than individual ones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Washing fruit ?
Pah , I just give apples a quick rub on my t-shirt and then bite it ; ) TBH it has been a long time since I last saw one with a label stuck on it , but maybe that 's because I mainly get them at corporate lunches and from pre-picked bags rather than individual ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Washing fruit?
Pah, I just give apples a quick rub on my t-shirt and then bite it ;)TBH it has been a long time since I last saw one with a label stuck on it, but maybe that's because I mainly get them at corporate lunches and from pre-picked bags rather than individual ones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994302</id>
	<title>So, what does that mean....</title>
	<author>dals\_rule</author>
	<datestamp>1257433800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...for the research into splicing zebra genes into produce to automatically grow barcodes into fruit and vegetables?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...for the research into splicing zebra genes into produce to automatically grow barcodes into fruit and vegetables ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...for the research into splicing zebra genes into produce to automatically grow barcodes into fruit and vegetables?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994680</id>
	<title>Re:We don't need no stickers at all..</title>
	<author>mopslik</author>
	<datestamp>1257435780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At my local grocery store, they sell three different types of bananas: "standard" (49c/lb), organic (79c/lb) and fair trade (89c/lb). Without some form of labelling, the cashier cannot distinguish between the types.</p><p>Of course, the self-checkout lanes make this entire argument almost moot...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At my local grocery store , they sell three different types of bananas : " standard " ( 49c/lb ) , organic ( 79c/lb ) and fair trade ( 89c/lb ) .
Without some form of labelling , the cashier can not distinguish between the types.Of course , the self-checkout lanes make this entire argument almost moot.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At my local grocery store, they sell three different types of bananas: "standard" (49c/lb), organic (79c/lb) and fair trade (89c/lb).
Without some form of labelling, the cashier cannot distinguish between the types.Of course, the self-checkout lanes make this entire argument almost moot...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993900</id>
	<title>How many times...?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1257431640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?</p></div><p>Exactly as many times, as a happened to be a complete and utter drooling retard with no right to live, who should have long ago received a Darwin award! (I.e. <em>never</em>!)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you 're also chomping on a sticker label ? Exactly as many times , as a happened to be a complete and utter drooling retard with no right to live , who should have long ago received a Darwin award !
( I.e. never !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?Exactly as many times, as a happened to be a complete and utter drooling retard with no right to live, who should have long ago received a Darwin award!
(I.e. never!
)
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29997196</id>
	<title>Cue offensive fruit labels</title>
	<author>cheros</author>
	<datestamp>1257448080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I give this a week before someone puts other messages into that process.  I'd keep an eye on bananas<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I give this a week before someone puts other messages into that process .
I 'd keep an eye on bananas : - ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I give this a week before someone puts other messages into that process.
I'd keep an eye on bananas :-).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994566</id>
	<title>How long before</title>
	<author>NeumannCons</author>
	<datestamp>1257435240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why does it strike me as more of a ploy to make sure you can't remove the label even if you wanted to?<br><br>I'll bet right now marketing is sitting around a conference table:<br>"This looks pretty good for a start, but we've done some market research that shows that consumers want the labeling on the inside as well.  We need some type of penetrating laser that will label the edible parts inside.    We need to be able to etch the outside of the banana skin as well as etch  at least a logo on the edible part inside.  Also, if we're doing citirus, we need to be able to etch each segment.  We need to make sure our logo is seen from the moment you go into the store to the moment you put it in your mouth...  Hmmm, I wonder if we can extend that to the moment we flush it down...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does it strike me as more of a ploy to make sure you ca n't remove the label even if you wanted to ? I 'll bet right now marketing is sitting around a conference table : " This looks pretty good for a start , but we 've done some market research that shows that consumers want the labeling on the inside as well .
We need some type of penetrating laser that will label the edible parts inside .
We need to be able to etch the outside of the banana skin as well as etch at least a logo on the edible part inside .
Also , if we 're doing citirus , we need to be able to etch each segment .
We need to make sure our logo is seen from the moment you go into the store to the moment you put it in your mouth... Hmmm , I wonder if we can extend that to the moment we flush it down.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does it strike me as more of a ploy to make sure you can't remove the label even if you wanted to?I'll bet right now marketing is sitting around a conference table:"This looks pretty good for a start, but we've done some market research that shows that consumers want the labeling on the inside as well.
We need some type of penetrating laser that will label the edible parts inside.
We need to be able to etch the outside of the banana skin as well as etch  at least a logo on the edible part inside.
Also, if we're doing citirus, we need to be able to etch each segment.
We need to make sure our logo is seen from the moment you go into the store to the moment you put it in your mouth...  Hmmm, I wonder if we can extend that to the moment we flush it down...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995622</id>
	<title>Mmmm  Massive Grapefruit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257440640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Once the technology is approved in the US, researchers from the University of Florida and the USDA Agricultural Research Service hope that it will be used in Florida's massive grapefruit industry."</p></div></blockquote><p>I LOVE massive grapefruit.  They have more flavor than the massless variety.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once the technology is approved in the US , researchers from the University of Florida and the USDA Agricultural Research Service hope that it will be used in Florida 's massive grapefruit industry .
" I LOVE massive grapefruit .
They have more flavor than the massless variety .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once the technology is approved in the US, researchers from the University of Florida and the USDA Agricultural Research Service hope that it will be used in Florida's massive grapefruit industry.
"I LOVE massive grapefruit.
They have more flavor than the massless variety.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29997284</id>
	<title>Re:Dude</title>
	<author>malakai</author>
	<datestamp>1257448560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it has to do with age. A large portion of us have been here from 1999'ish. That's 10 years ago. If we were 23 then, we're 33 now. If we were cynical then, imagine what we are now.</p><p>I've caught myself numerous times typing a reply to something and the cynicism was dripping from my fingers. To correct this, I just don't post much anymore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it has to do with age .
A large portion of us have been here from 1999'ish .
That 's 10 years ago .
If we were 23 then , we 're 33 now .
If we were cynical then , imagine what we are now.I 've caught myself numerous times typing a reply to something and the cynicism was dripping from my fingers .
To correct this , I just do n't post much anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it has to do with age.
A large portion of us have been here from 1999'ish.
That's 10 years ago.
If we were 23 then, we're 33 now.
If we were cynical then, imagine what we are now.I've caught myself numerous times typing a reply to something and the cynicism was dripping from my fingers.
To correct this, I just don't post much anymore.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30005948</id>
	<title>Re:An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>fritish</author>
	<datestamp>1257524940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What about those of us that need the zest of the fruit for cooking? Or use lemon peel/orange peel in mixed drinks?

Personally, I'm not sure I would care about my own drink, but I would avoid putting the laser etched parts in guests drinks (for aesthetic reasons).</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about those of us that need the zest of the fruit for cooking ?
Or use lemon peel/orange peel in mixed drinks ?
Personally , I 'm not sure I would care about my own drink , but I would avoid putting the laser etched parts in guests drinks ( for aesthetic reasons ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about those of us that need the zest of the fruit for cooking?
Or use lemon peel/orange peel in mixed drinks?
Personally, I'm not sure I would care about my own drink, but I would avoid putting the laser etched parts in guests drinks (for aesthetic reasons).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30000274</id>
	<title>Re:those stickers are edible</title>
	<author>hmar</author>
	<datestamp>1257417960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I find them in my daughter's diapers every now and then.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I find them in my daughter 's diapers every now and then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find them in my daughter's diapers every now and then.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994730</id>
	<title>Whole Foods?</title>
	<author>kitsunewarlock</author>
	<datestamp>1257436020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apparently sharks have gotten wiser and are now trying to attract a 'healthier crowd' by using fruit as bait.  I hope this trend in eating healthier humans pleases our laser mounted ocean-dwelling overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently sharks have gotten wiser and are now trying to attract a 'healthier crowd ' by using fruit as bait .
I hope this trend in eating healthier humans pleases our laser mounted ocean-dwelling overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently sharks have gotten wiser and are now trying to attract a 'healthier crowd' by using fruit as bait.
I hope this trend in eating healthier humans pleases our laser mounted ocean-dwelling overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993760</id>
	<title>Re:An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>Ogive17</author>
	<datestamp>1257430920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the laser etching would be ok for stuff like oranges, grapefruit and bananas (fruits where the skin is typically not eaten)..   But stuff like apples and peaches I would not want it etched.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the laser etching would be ok for stuff like oranges , grapefruit and bananas ( fruits where the skin is typically not eaten ) .. But stuff like apples and peaches I would not want it etched .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the laser etching would be ok for stuff like oranges, grapefruit and bananas (fruits where the skin is typically not eaten)..   But stuff like apples and peaches I would not want it etched.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30002498</id>
	<title>What about the printed-on labels?</title>
	<author>Qubit</author>
	<datestamp>1257433860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't anyone remember the oranges that had printed-on blue labels? I think that Sunkist used to do that.</p><p>I've looked all over, and found some fruit label sites <a href="http://www.nationalfinder.com/fruitlabels/links.htm" title="nationalfinder.com">like this</a> [nationalfinder.com], but haven't been able to find a picture of an orange with the printing.</p><p>I think that the ink could rub off, which is perhaps why the fruit industry abandoned that method. Interestingly, the printing looked nearly exactly like the laser imprinting, albeit in a different color and a little less crisp.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't anyone remember the oranges that had printed-on blue labels ?
I think that Sunkist used to do that.I 've looked all over , and found some fruit label sites like this [ nationalfinder.com ] , but have n't been able to find a picture of an orange with the printing.I think that the ink could rub off , which is perhaps why the fruit industry abandoned that method .
Interestingly , the printing looked nearly exactly like the laser imprinting , albeit in a different color and a little less crisp .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't anyone remember the oranges that had printed-on blue labels?
I think that Sunkist used to do that.I've looked all over, and found some fruit label sites like this [nationalfinder.com], but haven't been able to find a picture of an orange with the printing.I think that the ink could rub off, which is perhaps why the fruit industry abandoned that method.
Interestingly, the printing looked nearly exactly like the laser imprinting, albeit in a different color and a little less crisp.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994252</id>
	<title>Massive grapefruit</title>
	<author>snsh</author>
	<datestamp>1257433560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Where can I buy one of these massive grapefruits from Florida?  Or are they talking about Ricky Williams' head?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where can I buy one of these massive grapefruits from Florida ?
Or are they talking about Ricky Williams ' head ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where can I buy one of these massive grapefruits from Florida?
Or are they talking about Ricky Williams' head?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994160</id>
	<title>Meh</title>
	<author>ladadadada</author>
	<datestamp>1257433080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is another one of those annoying blog posts where some uninformed non-scientist copy-pastes an article from a reputable scientific reporting organisation.  At least in this case he linked to the original: <a href="http://www.physorg.com/news176483573.html" title="physorg.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.physorg.com/news176483573.html</a> [physorg.com] which appears to be a duplicate of an even older article: <a href="http://www.physorg.com/news170927623.html" title="physorg.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.physorg.com/news170927623.html</a> [physorg.com]</p><p>The main advantage appears to be not that people don't have to peel the sticker off before eating their apples but rather that the label cannot be tampered with.  (Or at least, not easily.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is another one of those annoying blog posts where some uninformed non-scientist copy-pastes an article from a reputable scientific reporting organisation .
At least in this case he linked to the original : http : //www.physorg.com/news176483573.html [ physorg.com ] which appears to be a duplicate of an even older article : http : //www.physorg.com/news170927623.html [ physorg.com ] The main advantage appears to be not that people do n't have to peel the sticker off before eating their apples but rather that the label can not be tampered with .
( Or at least , not easily .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is another one of those annoying blog posts where some uninformed non-scientist copy-pastes an article from a reputable scientific reporting organisation.
At least in this case he linked to the original: http://www.physorg.com/news176483573.html [physorg.com] which appears to be a duplicate of an even older article: http://www.physorg.com/news170927623.html [physorg.com]The main advantage appears to be not that people don't have to peel the sticker off before eating their apples but rather that the label cannot be tampered with.
(Or at least, not easily.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996342</id>
	<title>As a graphic artist...</title>
	<author>elysiana</author>
	<datestamp>1257443940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I approve this technique! Just think of how cool kids will feel when they pull a grunge-styled banana out of their lunchbox... or an apple with skateboards all over it! Maybe an orange with Hannah Montana and all that girly sparkly crap. I mean, from past experience with fruit roll-ups, the obvious next step is X-TREME fruit, right? It practically markets itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I approve this technique !
Just think of how cool kids will feel when they pull a grunge-styled banana out of their lunchbox... or an apple with skateboards all over it !
Maybe an orange with Hannah Montana and all that girly sparkly crap .
I mean , from past experience with fruit roll-ups , the obvious next step is X-TREME fruit , right ?
It practically markets itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I approve this technique!
Just think of how cool kids will feel when they pull a grunge-styled banana out of their lunchbox... or an apple with skateboards all over it!
Maybe an orange with Hannah Montana and all that girly sparkly crap.
I mean, from past experience with fruit roll-ups, the obvious next step is X-TREME fruit, right?
It practically markets itself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995836</id>
	<title>Re:Dude</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257441540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What means anti-technology? and what is suprising? There are two different things, the technology its self and how and for what you use it. Electricity is great, this doesnt means that I have to put electrodes in my ass...and laser is great but this doesnt means I have to etch my kids foreheads with their names to remember them...</p><p>I thing that is very common and normal for close-to-tecnology people to see critically the applications of technology.</p><p>And for this case, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5021368/guy-uses-laser+etch-machine-to-tattoo-himself-verdict-flaming-nutcase" title="gizmodo.com" rel="nofollow">I dont thing there is really something technologicaly new</a> [gizmodo.com] in essense, the CO2 laser is here for years, it can etch many materials, and I cant see how the stickers in the fruits are a problem. Instead I read this is a patended (!) technology and in my oppinion is more marketing-oriented. In the end, WHY EVERY fruit must has its label if this isn't just marketing ? I say its insane. Also thing that, appart from this is very impressive (or digusting) to see this, that etching is not-removable, and everyone has to see it until he actualy eats or dispose the fruit.(you fork a tomato piece from the salad, and before you eat it -ofcource you look at it- and what you see?? a "SUPER TOMATO COMPANY" etch....common...mercy...the next thing is that when you fart, your ass will sing the company's advertising song of the food you had eaten.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What means anti-technology ?
and what is suprising ?
There are two different things , the technology its self and how and for what you use it .
Electricity is great , this doesnt means that I have to put electrodes in my ass...and laser is great but this doesnt means I have to etch my kids foreheads with their names to remember them...I thing that is very common and normal for close-to-tecnology people to see critically the applications of technology.And for this case , I dont thing there is really something technologicaly new [ gizmodo.com ] in essense , the CO2 laser is here for years , it can etch many materials , and I cant see how the stickers in the fruits are a problem .
Instead I read this is a patended ( !
) technology and in my oppinion is more marketing-oriented .
In the end , WHY EVERY fruit must has its label if this is n't just marketing ?
I say its insane .
Also thing that , appart from this is very impressive ( or digusting ) to see this , that etching is not-removable , and everyone has to see it until he actualy eats or dispose the fruit .
( you fork a tomato piece from the salad , and before you eat it -ofcource you look at it- and what you see ? ?
a " SUPER TOMATO COMPANY " etch....common...mercy...the next thing is that when you fart , your ass will sing the company 's advertising song of the food you had eaten .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What means anti-technology?
and what is suprising?
There are two different things, the technology its self and how and for what you use it.
Electricity is great, this doesnt means that I have to put electrodes in my ass...and laser is great but this doesnt means I have to etch my kids foreheads with their names to remember them...I thing that is very common and normal for close-to-tecnology people to see critically the applications of technology.And for this case, I dont thing there is really something technologicaly new [gizmodo.com] in essense, the CO2 laser is here for years, it can etch many materials, and I cant see how the stickers in the fruits are a problem.
Instead I read this is a patended (!
) technology and in my oppinion is more marketing-oriented.
In the end, WHY EVERY fruit must has its label if this isn't just marketing ?
I say its insane.
Also thing that, appart from this is very impressive (or digusting) to see this, that etching is not-removable, and everyone has to see it until he actualy eats or dispose the fruit.
(you fork a tomato piece from the salad, and before you eat it -ofcource you look at it- and what you see??
a "SUPER TOMATO COMPANY" etch....common...mercy...the next thing is that when you fart, your ass will sing the company's advertising song of the food you had eaten.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993694</id>
	<title>Re:Lecture Fruit!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257430560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't find it now, but several years ago someone floated this idea.  Etching ads on fruit with a laser.</p><p>While technically possible, it was roundly rejected by the "consumer test group".</p><p>I guess an apple just doesn't taste the same when an add for Preparation H is tattooed on it.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't find it now , but several years ago someone floated this idea .
Etching ads on fruit with a laser.While technically possible , it was roundly rejected by the " consumer test group " .I guess an apple just does n't taste the same when an add for Preparation H is tattooed on it.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't find it now, but several years ago someone floated this idea.
Etching ads on fruit with a laser.While technically possible, it was roundly rejected by the "consumer test group".I guess an apple just doesn't taste the same when an add for Preparation H is tattooed on it.....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994930</id>
	<title>Re:Corporate advertising.</title>
	<author>LtGordon</author>
	<datestamp>1257437160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apple is currently working on technology to inscribe a EULA on the inside of the peel.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple is currently working on technology to inscribe a EULA on the inside of the peel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple is currently working on technology to inscribe a EULA on the inside of the peel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995386</id>
	<title>Re:Or... Don't label it on the fruit at all!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257439380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Germany, we don't have redundant stickers that tell you what you are looking at. However many fruit like apples, bananas, kiwis, etc. occasionally have a small sticker with the brand/vendor name; usually on 2-3 items prominently placed on top of each palett.</p><p>I would have expected that to be the same for the US. Looking at the pictures in TFA I can't help but wonder how stupid people can be. Please tell me that this is not really the way fruit is labeled over there<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Germany , we do n't have redundant stickers that tell you what you are looking at .
However many fruit like apples , bananas , kiwis , etc .
occasionally have a small sticker with the brand/vendor name ; usually on 2-3 items prominently placed on top of each palett.I would have expected that to be the same for the US .
Looking at the pictures in TFA I ca n't help but wonder how stupid people can be .
Please tell me that this is not really the way fruit is labeled over there : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Germany, we don't have redundant stickers that tell you what you are looking at.
However many fruit like apples, bananas, kiwis, etc.
occasionally have a small sticker with the brand/vendor name; usually on 2-3 items prominently placed on top of each palett.I would have expected that to be the same for the US.
Looking at the pictures in TFA I can't help but wonder how stupid people can be.
Please tell me that this is not really the way fruit is labeled over there :D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30004712</id>
	<title>Hmm</title>
	<author>Niubi</author>
	<datestamp>1257515640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can't say I think that's such a great idea. Considering that more and more people are buying stuff on the internet anyway, it seems reasonable to assume that fruit and veg don't really need to be labeled as such, since you can view the price on the internet. And anyone remember those smart fridges which could access the internet and auto restock your fridge contents? They sounded awesome! Anyways, just look at sites like <a href="http://www.dubli.com/" title="dubli.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dubli.com/</a> [dubli.com] and you'll see what I mean. The internet's a growing place, and there's hundreds of ways to monetize it. This is just one of many areas where it's diversifying and changing our lives, for better or worse.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't say I think that 's such a great idea .
Considering that more and more people are buying stuff on the internet anyway , it seems reasonable to assume that fruit and veg do n't really need to be labeled as such , since you can view the price on the internet .
And anyone remember those smart fridges which could access the internet and auto restock your fridge contents ?
They sounded awesome !
Anyways , just look at sites like http : //www.dubli.com/ [ dubli.com ] and you 'll see what I mean .
The internet 's a growing place , and there 's hundreds of ways to monetize it .
This is just one of many areas where it 's diversifying and changing our lives , for better or worse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't say I think that's such a great idea.
Considering that more and more people are buying stuff on the internet anyway, it seems reasonable to assume that fruit and veg don't really need to be labeled as such, since you can view the price on the internet.
And anyone remember those smart fridges which could access the internet and auto restock your fridge contents?
They sounded awesome!
Anyways, just look at sites like http://www.dubli.com/ [dubli.com] and you'll see what I mean.
The internet's a growing place, and there's hundreds of ways to monetize it.
This is just one of many areas where it's diversifying and changing our lives, for better or worse.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994366</id>
	<title>5$ says that...</title>
	<author>KneelBeforeZod</author>
	<datestamp>1257434160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>using a magnifying glass and a bright day is cheaper.  I win.  Money please.</htmltext>
<tokenext>using a magnifying glass and a bright day is cheaper .
I win .
Money please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>using a magnifying glass and a bright day is cheaper.
I win.
Money please.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993940</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1257431820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it's just like burning. After all it's only light. Like heat. So it's like a very browned spot on something you put in the oven.</p><p>Don't get confused by the obviously wrong image that came with TFS. (Cyan? Really?? FAIL!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's just like burning .
After all it 's only light .
Like heat .
So it 's like a very browned spot on something you put in the oven.Do n't get confused by the obviously wrong image that came with TFS .
( Cyan ? Really ? ?
FAIL ! )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's just like burning.
After all it's only light.
Like heat.
So it's like a very browned spot on something you put in the oven.Don't get confused by the obviously wrong image that came with TFS.
(Cyan? Really??
FAIL!)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994340</id>
	<title>This is really going to raise the price of grapes.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257434040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to mention blueberries...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention blueberries.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention blueberries...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996684</id>
	<title>First Corn Flakes now this...</title>
	<author>FuzzySapiens</author>
	<datestamp>1257445620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A couple of weeks ago we saw that Kelloggs was going to laser etch corn flakes <a href="http://preview.tinyurl.com/yl56ddd" title="tinyurl.com" rel="nofollow">http://preview.tinyurl.com/yl56ddd</a> [tinyurl.com]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... how did we ever live without this?</htmltext>
<tokenext>A couple of weeks ago we saw that Kelloggs was going to laser etch corn flakes http : //preview.tinyurl.com/yl56ddd [ tinyurl.com ] ... how did we ever live without this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A couple of weeks ago we saw that Kelloggs was going to laser etch corn flakes http://preview.tinyurl.com/yl56ddd [tinyurl.com] ... how did we ever live without this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995294</id>
	<title>Wait a minute</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257438840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"thanks to new technology that uses a low-energy carbon dioxide laser beam"</p><p>I thought we were trying to REDUCE or carbon footprint!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" thanks to new technology that uses a low-energy carbon dioxide laser beam " I thought we were trying to REDUCE or carbon footprint !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"thanks to new technology that uses a low-energy carbon dioxide laser beam"I thought we were trying to REDUCE or carbon footprint!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994046</id>
	<title>Could we be any more lazy?</title>
	<author>dae3dae3</author>
	<datestamp>1257432300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now we can't even be bothered to peel a tiny sticker off a piece of fruit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now we ca n't even be bothered to peel a tiny sticker off a piece of fruit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now we can't even be bothered to peel a tiny sticker off a piece of fruit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994614</id>
	<title>Hey, I use that!</title>
	<author>Daniel\_Abraham</author>
	<datestamp>1257435480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I use citrus zest all the time!  If this technique changes the flavor, texture, or aroma of my fruit, I say stick with the labels.  I can peel off a label and still have the whole zest.  That etching means I lost a good chunk of peel I'd use for candied citrus peel, not to mention making any sorbet served inside an orange just plain silly-looking.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I use citrus zest all the time !
If this technique changes the flavor , texture , or aroma of my fruit , I say stick with the labels .
I can peel off a label and still have the whole zest .
That etching means I lost a good chunk of peel I 'd use for candied citrus peel , not to mention making any sorbet served inside an orange just plain silly-looking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use citrus zest all the time!
If this technique changes the flavor, texture, or aroma of my fruit, I say stick with the labels.
I can peel off a label and still have the whole zest.
That etching means I lost a good chunk of peel I'd use for candied citrus peel, not to mention making any sorbet served inside an orange just plain silly-looking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994112</id>
	<title>Re:Lecture Fruit!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257432780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can get most of that <a href="http://www.nutritiondata.com/" title="nutritiondata.com" rel="nofollow">information here.</a> [nutritiondata.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can get most of that information here .
[ nutritiondata.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can get most of that information here.
[nutritiondata.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994510</id>
	<title>Re:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257434880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it's funny groups like PETA get all up in arms about poor treatment of animals when fruits and vegetables are getting inhumanely branded before their corpses are devoured by an uncaring mob.  It only adds insult to injury.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's funny groups like PETA get all up in arms about poor treatment of animals when fruits and vegetables are getting inhumanely branded before their corpses are devoured by an uncaring mob .
It only adds insult to injury .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's funny groups like PETA get all up in arms about poor treatment of animals when fruits and vegetables are getting inhumanely branded before their corpses are devoured by an uncaring mob.
It only adds insult to injury.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29999954</id>
	<title>Re:Lecture Fruit!</title>
	<author>cayenne8</author>
	<datestamp>1257416580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"Have you ever looked at the fat content of a Apple? or and Olive?"</i> <p>
Well as another person on this thread mentioned...fat in an apple??</p><p>
But sure, olives have fat...they also have olive OIL in them..which is good for you.</p><p>
Not all fats are bad, you actually NEED them in your diet...and more and more studies are showing that increased fat consumption (to a certain level) can actually help your metabolism and help you burn off body fat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Have you ever looked at the fat content of a Apple ?
or and Olive ?
" Well as another person on this thread mentioned...fat in an apple ? ?
But sure , olives have fat...they also have olive OIL in them..which is good for you .
Not all fats are bad , you actually NEED them in your diet...and more and more studies are showing that increased fat consumption ( to a certain level ) can actually help your metabolism and help you burn off body fat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Have you ever looked at the fat content of a Apple?
or and Olive?
" 
Well as another person on this thread mentioned...fat in an apple??
But sure, olives have fat...they also have olive OIL in them..which is good for you.
Not all fats are bad, you actually NEED them in your diet...and more and more studies are showing that increased fat consumption (to a certain level) can actually help your metabolism and help you burn off body fat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994602</id>
	<title>Unneccessary Obfuscation</title>
	<author>uneek</author>
	<datestamp>1257435420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Burning the skin of a grapefruit with a laser may be ok, but here are some questions:</p><p>1) With the laser burns, it may be possible to cover up blemishes or signs of mold or rot on the skin of a fruit.</p><p>2) What happens with apples, potatoes, carrots, pears, and other fruits and vegetables where its good to eat the skin? I don't want some artificial chemical imprinted into the skins that I would normally eat.</p><p>I always know a label is there, I know to take it off.  For fruits and vegetables with skins that are supposed to removed, the label is not a problem because I peel off the skin.</p><p>So this technology does not really solve anything, and it becomes an inconvenience.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Burning the skin of a grapefruit with a laser may be ok , but here are some questions : 1 ) With the laser burns , it may be possible to cover up blemishes or signs of mold or rot on the skin of a fruit.2 ) What happens with apples , potatoes , carrots , pears , and other fruits and vegetables where its good to eat the skin ?
I do n't want some artificial chemical imprinted into the skins that I would normally eat.I always know a label is there , I know to take it off .
For fruits and vegetables with skins that are supposed to removed , the label is not a problem because I peel off the skin.So this technology does not really solve anything , and it becomes an inconvenience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Burning the skin of a grapefruit with a laser may be ok, but here are some questions:1) With the laser burns, it may be possible to cover up blemishes or signs of mold or rot on the skin of a fruit.2) What happens with apples, potatoes, carrots, pears, and other fruits and vegetables where its good to eat the skin?
I don't want some artificial chemical imprinted into the skins that I would normally eat.I always know a label is there, I know to take it off.
For fruits and vegetables with skins that are supposed to removed, the label is not a problem because I peel off the skin.So this technology does not really solve anything, and it becomes an inconvenience.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994840</id>
	<title>Genetic Modification</title>
	<author>Alain Williams</author>
	<datestamp>1257436560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The proper way of solving this problem is to produce a GM variant that grows the bar code into the skin.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The proper way of solving this problem is to produce a GM variant that grows the bar code into the skin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The proper way of solving this problem is to produce a GM variant that grows the bar code into the skin.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993790</id>
	<title>Or... Don't label it on the fruit at all!</title>
	<author>thue</author>
	<datestamp>1257431100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or... Don't label it on the fruit at all!</p><p>If you need to label it "Florida citrus", do it on the outside the box in the supermarket.</p><p>Actually that labelling on the fruit must be a US thing. They don't do it here in Denmark.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or... Do n't label it on the fruit at all ! If you need to label it " Florida citrus " , do it on the outside the box in the supermarket.Actually that labelling on the fruit must be a US thing .
They do n't do it here in Denmark .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or... Don't label it on the fruit at all!If you need to label it "Florida citrus", do it on the outside the box in the supermarket.Actually that labelling on the fruit must be a US thing.
They don't do it here in Denmark.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29997164</id>
	<title>Re:Dude</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257447960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if skepticism is a natural attribute of intelligence. This would mean that every new piece of information is evaluated critically instead of swallowing all the hype whole.</p><p>Overall, this makes for good discussion. Sure, it can come across whiny and bitchy on occasion, but it's much more interesting to talk about a product's pitfalls than to just repeat the marketing hype and get all  "OMG nerdgasm!!!1!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if skepticism is a natural attribute of intelligence .
This would mean that every new piece of information is evaluated critically instead of swallowing all the hype whole.Overall , this makes for good discussion .
Sure , it can come across whiny and bitchy on occasion , but it 's much more interesting to talk about a product 's pitfalls than to just repeat the marketing hype and get all " OMG nerdgasm ! ! ! 1 !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if skepticism is a natural attribute of intelligence.
This would mean that every new piece of information is evaluated critically instead of swallowing all the hype whole.Overall, this makes for good discussion.
Sure, it can come across whiny and bitchy on occasion, but it's much more interesting to talk about a product's pitfalls than to just repeat the marketing hype and get all  "OMG nerdgasm!!!1!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994696</id>
	<title>Re:And you think it will just be for labeling?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257435840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and what's stopping them from doing that with stickers right now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and what 's stopping them from doing that with stickers right now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and what's stopping them from doing that with stickers right now?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30003082</id>
	<title>Re:An answer in search for a problem?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257443640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clearly you've never seen the first 5 minutes of U571!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly you 've never seen the first 5 minutes of U571 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly you've never seen the first 5 minutes of U571!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996056</id>
	<title>Problem solved!</title>
	<author>Captain Spam</author>
	<datestamp>1257442620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?</p></div><p>Man, don't I know it.  I can't even begin to count the number of times I was in the produce section of the supermarket when I was suddenly overcome with a primal urge to blindly ram whole fruit into my mouth.  Doesn't matter what type; apples, pears, oranges, kiwi, pineapples, whatever's immediately there, I grab it and jam it into my mouth with reckless abandon, not even bothering to look at what it is, let alone whether or not it's one of the many, many fruits that have stickers on them.</p><p>Now, I'll admit that a fair share of the inconvenience I've had from this condition stems from dealing with these backwards yokels around where I live who are either unable or unwilling to understand my perfectly common and normal intermittent fruit-ravenous needs, but in all actuality, there's nothing more annoying than the thought that when I'm forcing an apple down my throat without looking at it, there's a chance that there may be a sticker on it.  I can barely stand the thought sitting here right now!</p><p>That's why I'm so glad the good people who work for our nation's fruit growers have recognized this very obvious need which, until this point, has been sorely lacking a solution.  The next time I'm racing through the produce department, not even bothering to even give the most cursory of glances at what I eat before I eat it despite the fact that it is fairly well-known that there are stickers on fruit, I will salute our laser-etching fruit guardians.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you 're also chomping on a sticker label ? Man , do n't I know it .
I ca n't even begin to count the number of times I was in the produce section of the supermarket when I was suddenly overcome with a primal urge to blindly ram whole fruit into my mouth .
Does n't matter what type ; apples , pears , oranges , kiwi , pineapples , whatever 's immediately there , I grab it and jam it into my mouth with reckless abandon , not even bothering to look at what it is , let alone whether or not it 's one of the many , many fruits that have stickers on them.Now , I 'll admit that a fair share of the inconvenience I 've had from this condition stems from dealing with these backwards yokels around where I live who are either unable or unwilling to understand my perfectly common and normal intermittent fruit-ravenous needs , but in all actuality , there 's nothing more annoying than the thought that when I 'm forcing an apple down my throat without looking at it , there 's a chance that there may be a sticker on it .
I can barely stand the thought sitting here right now ! That 's why I 'm so glad the good people who work for our nation 's fruit growers have recognized this very obvious need which , until this point , has been sorely lacking a solution .
The next time I 'm racing through the produce department , not even bothering to even give the most cursory of glances at what I eat before I eat it despite the fact that it is fairly well-known that there are stickers on fruit , I will salute our laser-etching fruit guardians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?Man, don't I know it.
I can't even begin to count the number of times I was in the produce section of the supermarket when I was suddenly overcome with a primal urge to blindly ram whole fruit into my mouth.
Doesn't matter what type; apples, pears, oranges, kiwi, pineapples, whatever's immediately there, I grab it and jam it into my mouth with reckless abandon, not even bothering to look at what it is, let alone whether or not it's one of the many, many fruits that have stickers on them.Now, I'll admit that a fair share of the inconvenience I've had from this condition stems from dealing with these backwards yokels around where I live who are either unable or unwilling to understand my perfectly common and normal intermittent fruit-ravenous needs, but in all actuality, there's nothing more annoying than the thought that when I'm forcing an apple down my throat without looking at it, there's a chance that there may be a sticker on it.
I can barely stand the thought sitting here right now!That's why I'm so glad the good people who work for our nation's fruit growers have recognized this very obvious need which, until this point, has been sorely lacking a solution.
The next time I'm racing through the produce department, not even bothering to even give the most cursory of glances at what I eat before I eat it despite the fact that it is fairly well-known that there are stickers on fruit, I will salute our laser-etching fruit guardians.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994146</id>
	<title>In other words...</title>
	<author>axl917</author>
	<datestamp>1257433020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>money is being spent to protect people from their own stupidity.</p><p>Biting into the label?  Seriously?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>money is being spent to protect people from their own stupidity.Biting into the label ?
Seriously ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>money is being spent to protect people from their own stupidity.Biting into the label?
Seriously?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993846</id>
	<title>We don't need no stickers at all..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257431400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You could put the label on the boxes, or on a sign in the store.. come to think of it, they already do, so why the hell do you need stickers on each individual piece of fruit?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You could put the label on the boxes , or on a sign in the store.. come to think of it , they already do , so why the hell do you need stickers on each individual piece of fruit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could put the label on the boxes, or on a sign in the store.. come to think of it, they already do, so why the hell do you need stickers on each individual piece of fruit?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994280</id>
	<title>I'll be rich</title>
	<author>gtall</author>
	<datestamp>1257433680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>my fruit label collection is going to be worth millions!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>my fruit label collection is going to be worth millions !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>my fruit label collection is going to be worth millions!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994238</id>
	<title>Re:Corporate advertising.</title>
	<author>Darth\_brooks</author>
	<datestamp>1257433500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's nothing. If Apple starts making laser etched fruit trendy, soon they'll have a whole produce division! Couple that with genetic modification and one day I'll be able to compare Apple's Oranges to Orange Apples and.....oh no, I've gone cross-eyed....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's nothing .
If Apple starts making laser etched fruit trendy , soon they 'll have a whole produce division !
Couple that with genetic modification and one day I 'll be able to compare Apple 's Oranges to Orange Apples and.....oh no , I 've gone cross-eyed... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's nothing.
If Apple starts making laser etched fruit trendy, soon they'll have a whole produce division!
Couple that with genetic modification and one day I'll be able to compare Apple's Oranges to Orange Apples and.....oh no, I've gone cross-eyed....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996280</id>
	<title>Re:And you think it will just be for labeling?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257443640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is this going to be any different from the stickers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this going to be any different from the stickers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this going to be any different from the stickers?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998482</id>
	<title>Re:Lecture Fruit!</title>
	<author>MiniMike</author>
	<datestamp>1257453540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Perhaps government will put missing persons reports on them...</p></div><p>Maybe they could put report of missing twins on pears...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps government will put missing persons reports on them...Maybe they could put report of missing twins on pears.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps government will put missing persons reports on them...Maybe they could put report of missing twins on pears...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993982</id>
	<title>Remove sticker before inserting in mouth.</title>
	<author>Kartoffel</author>
	<datestamp>1257432000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?"</p><p>ZERO.  Don't you wash your fruit before eating it?  Sheesh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you 're also chomping on a sticker label ? " ZERO .
Do n't you wash your fruit before eating it ?
Sheesh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How many times have you bit into a piece of fruit only to find that you're also chomping on a sticker label?"ZERO.
Don't you wash your fruit before eating it?
Sheesh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30001664</id>
	<title>Better solution.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257425580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stop writing shit on fruit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stop writing shit on fruit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stop writing shit on fruit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994460</id>
	<title>Do you eat grapefruit skins?</title>
	<author>Joce640k</author>
	<datestamp>1257434640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...'cos if you don't then it's not really a problem, is it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...'cos if you do n't then it 's not really a problem , is it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...'cos if you don't then it's not really a problem, is it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995466</id>
	<title>Re:Dude</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1257439740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are correct. After 9/11 this site become a lot more political and anti-whatever.</p><p>The most pathetic thing is these people think there contributing something.</p><p>Very anti-change. If' ti's different it must be worse. Forget the fact that improvments are almost always better, cheaper safer then previoud, that's why they're improvements.</p><p>This is a LASER writing on fruit so precisely it doesn't break the skin, it's cheaper then stickers, and it's a LASER.</p><p>Seriously people.</p><p>I wish ther was a way to make people read the article before posting. Or at least increase the odds. Maybe they need to click on the link in order to post. Yeah, easy to get around but if it would increase the odds, it would be worth it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are correct .
After 9/11 this site become a lot more political and anti-whatever.The most pathetic thing is these people think there contributing something.Very anti-change .
If ' ti 's different it must be worse .
Forget the fact that improvments are almost always better , cheaper safer then previoud , that 's why they 're improvements.This is a LASER writing on fruit so precisely it does n't break the skin , it 's cheaper then stickers , and it 's a LASER.Seriously people.I wish ther was a way to make people read the article before posting .
Or at least increase the odds .
Maybe they need to click on the link in order to post .
Yeah , easy to get around but if it would increase the odds , it would be worth it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are correct.
After 9/11 this site become a lot more political and anti-whatever.The most pathetic thing is these people think there contributing something.Very anti-change.
If' ti's different it must be worse.
Forget the fact that improvments are almost always better, cheaper safer then previoud, that's why they're improvements.This is a LASER writing on fruit so precisely it doesn't break the skin, it's cheaper then stickers, and it's a LASER.Seriously people.I wish ther was a way to make people read the article before posting.
Or at least increase the odds.
Maybe they need to click on the link in order to post.
Yeah, easy to get around but if it would increase the odds, it would be worth it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993992</id>
	<title>Re:Dude</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257432060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People who are heavily involved in technology are more likely to be aware that it is a tool to be used appropriately.  Not the anodyne to everything and not, per se, better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People who are heavily involved in technology are more likely to be aware that it is a tool to be used appropriately .
Not the anodyne to everything and not , per se , better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People who are heavily involved in technology are more likely to be aware that it is a tool to be used appropriately.
Not the anodyne to everything and not, per se, better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994322</id>
	<title>Re:Lecture Fruit!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257433920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe they will label the fruit "Do not remove this label by penalty of law"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they will label the fruit " Do not remove this label by penalty of law "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they will label the fruit "Do not remove this label by penalty of law"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994400</id>
	<title>Re:What does this do, chemically?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257434340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm less concerned about chemicals than the aesthetics...

I use fruit not only for eating, but also for presentation.  It looks good in a fruit bowl, or on top of a dessert.  Now it will have the mark of the beast on it and will look like garbage.

Fruit is art, leave it alone.

ps.  Those stickers suck too.  Peeling them off damages the fruit skin.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm less concerned about chemicals than the aesthetics.. . I use fruit not only for eating , but also for presentation .
It looks good in a fruit bowl , or on top of a dessert .
Now it will have the mark of the beast on it and will look like garbage .
Fruit is art , leave it alone .
ps. Those stickers suck too .
Peeling them off damages the fruit skin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm less concerned about chemicals than the aesthetics...

I use fruit not only for eating, but also for presentation.
It looks good in a fruit bowl, or on top of a dessert.
Now it will have the mark of the beast on it and will look like garbage.
Fruit is art, leave it alone.
ps.  Those stickers suck too.
Peeling them off damages the fruit skin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998888</id>
	<title>Re:Lecture Fruit!</title>
	<author>plague3106</author>
	<datestamp>1257412260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*sigh*  There is no significant fat content to an apple.  The sugar in an apple is fuctose, which doesn't spike insulin levels (GI = ~19).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* sigh * There is no significant fat content to an apple .
The sugar in an apple is fuctose , which does n't spike insulin levels ( GI = ~ 19 ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*sigh*  There is no significant fat content to an apple.
The sugar in an apple is fuctose, which doesn't spike insulin levels (GI = ~19).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995748</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30000294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995406
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29999020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30002162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29999656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996600
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29999954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30002640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30004816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29999472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30000274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29997164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30003082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30005736
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30005560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30005948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29997284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29997124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29997786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30001422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30003152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30006404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30003416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0336210_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29997990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994282
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994366
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995138
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29997786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30005736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995114
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994606
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993814
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993782
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994962
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995418
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30006404
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30003152
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29997990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995256
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995984
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995812
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994084
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29997164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29997284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993992
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994352
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996476
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996280
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993590
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993760
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996390
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994060
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994132
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29999020
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994540
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30003082
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30005948
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30000294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30002162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30001422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998626
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994840
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993792
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993838
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30000274
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995246
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993870
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994680
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996890
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993900
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29999656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996600
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998096
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994400
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993898
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30004816
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30002640
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996210
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995678
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29997124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993940
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29999472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29996834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993748
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993864
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994602
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993866
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994478
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993682
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994978
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30003416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993704
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994238
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994930
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.30005560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29993848
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995748
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998888
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29999954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29998482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29994322
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0336210.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0336210.29995978
</commentlist>
</conversation>
