<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_02_1739238</id>
	<title>Terminator Franchise To Be Auctioned Off</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1257190680000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><i>"For sale: One slightly-used Terminator. Still works, minor attitude problems, get it cheap now!'</i>  Several sources are reporting that the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/11/02/will-the-terminator-be-back-sci-fi-franchise-could-sell-for/">Terminator franchise is set to be auctioned off</a> just three weeks after another well known franchise, the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, was sold for $60 million. The present owner, Halcyon, has filed for chapter 11 after a dispute with a hedge fund that lent Halcyon the money to buy the rights to begin with. The auction will include rights to everything but the first two films.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" For sale : One slightly-used Terminator .
Still works , minor attitude problems , get it cheap now !
' Several sources are reporting that the Terminator franchise is set to be auctioned off just three weeks after another well known franchise , the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles , was sold for $ 60 million .
The present owner , Halcyon , has filed for chapter 11 after a dispute with a hedge fund that lent Halcyon the money to buy the rights to begin with .
The auction will include rights to everything but the first two films .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"For sale: One slightly-used Terminator.
Still works, minor attitude problems, get it cheap now!
'  Several sources are reporting that the Terminator franchise is set to be auctioned off just three weeks after another well known franchise, the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, was sold for $60 million.
The present owner, Halcyon, has filed for chapter 11 after a dispute with a hedge fund that lent Halcyon the money to buy the rights to begin with.
The auction will include rights to everything but the first two films.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955366</id>
	<title>Re:So it's worthless, then?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257158040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the 3rd film gets an unfair bad rap. Yes, it is very different in tone than the first two films--much darker and more fatalistic. And it's set in a different timeline than the first two, it's true. But I like that someone took a different tack with it. If Mostow had just done a knockoff of the Cameron films, he would rightly be called to task for it. So he at least decided to go a different route (Screw that "Future is what we make it" optimism!). Yeah, the comedy bits were a bit overdone, but how could he have made a sequel to such a iconic film series and not have a few nods at the camera (like we're not supposed to notice that Schwarzenegger looks 20 years older and has a gut now)? I thought it was pretty good for what it was. About the only thing that I didn't like was the casting of Connor and the way they played his character like a whiny pansy (*this* is the guy that was supposed to have spent most of his life preparing for Judgement Day, really?).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the 3rd film gets an unfair bad rap .
Yes , it is very different in tone than the first two films--much darker and more fatalistic .
And it 's set in a different timeline than the first two , it 's true .
But I like that someone took a different tack with it .
If Mostow had just done a knockoff of the Cameron films , he would rightly be called to task for it .
So he at least decided to go a different route ( Screw that " Future is what we make it " optimism ! ) .
Yeah , the comedy bits were a bit overdone , but how could he have made a sequel to such a iconic film series and not have a few nods at the camera ( like we 're not supposed to notice that Schwarzenegger looks 20 years older and has a gut now ) ?
I thought it was pretty good for what it was .
About the only thing that I did n't like was the casting of Connor and the way they played his character like a whiny pansy ( * this * is the guy that was supposed to have spent most of his life preparing for Judgement Day , really ?
) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the 3rd film gets an unfair bad rap.
Yes, it is very different in tone than the first two films--much darker and more fatalistic.
And it's set in a different timeline than the first two, it's true.
But I like that someone took a different tack with it.
If Mostow had just done a knockoff of the Cameron films, he would rightly be called to task for it.
So he at least decided to go a different route (Screw that "Future is what we make it" optimism!).
Yeah, the comedy bits were a bit overdone, but how could he have made a sequel to such a iconic film series and not have a few nods at the camera (like we're not supposed to notice that Schwarzenegger looks 20 years older and has a gut now)?
I thought it was pretty good for what it was.
About the only thing that I didn't like was the casting of Connor and the way they played his character like a whiny pansy (*this* is the guy that was supposed to have spent most of his life preparing for Judgement Day, really?
).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955348</id>
	<title>Re:First two films?</title>
	<author>Maxo-Texas</author>
	<datestamp>1257157980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The third changed the basic message of the series from "you can change your fate" to "you can't change your fate".</p><p>It's kinda like bringing "Lord of the Rings 4: Turns out Sauron and the Ring are still doing fine" so they can make more money.</p><p>The fourth wasn't bad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The third changed the basic message of the series from " you can change your fate " to " you ca n't change your fate " .It 's kinda like bringing " Lord of the Rings 4 : Turns out Sauron and the Ring are still doing fine " so they can make more money.The fourth was n't bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The third changed the basic message of the series from "you can change your fate" to "you can't change your fate".It's kinda like bringing "Lord of the Rings 4: Turns out Sauron and the Ring are still doing fine" so they can make more money.The fourth wasn't bad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954680</id>
	<title>Re:So it's worthless, then?</title>
	<author>srealm</author>
	<datestamp>1257154980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know, but I know who to ask.  Darl? where are you?  What were we supposed to get for our $699 again?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know , but I know who to ask .
Darl ? where are you ?
What were we supposed to get for our $ 699 again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know, but I know who to ask.
Darl? where are you?
What were we supposed to get for our $699 again?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955958</id>
	<title>Re:It's a rights deal</title>
	<author>fishizzle</author>
	<datestamp>1257160740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The movie has only been out for 5 months!  It hasn't even been released for rental or sale on DVD or BlueRay yet.  Maybe using "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood\_accounting" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Hollywood accounting</a> [wikipedia.org]" the movie has just broken even, so by buying the rights to it now, you're only going to receive all the profit the movie is ever going to make outside of its first 5 months of existence.  This is bad somehow?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The movie has only been out for 5 months !
It has n't even been released for rental or sale on DVD or BlueRay yet .
Maybe using " Hollywood accounting [ wikipedia.org ] " the movie has just broken even , so by buying the rights to it now , you 're only going to receive all the profit the movie is ever going to make outside of its first 5 months of existence .
This is bad somehow ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The movie has only been out for 5 months!
It hasn't even been released for rental or sale on DVD or BlueRay yet.
Maybe using "Hollywood accounting [wikipedia.org]" the movie has just broken even, so by buying the rights to it now, you're only going to receive all the profit the movie is ever going to make outside of its first 5 months of existence.
This is bad somehow?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29969746</id>
	<title>Re:It's a rights deal</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1257248400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what you are saying is that there is an awesome TMNT movie on the way?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what you are saying is that there is an awesome TMNT movie on the way ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what you are saying is that there is an awesome TMNT movie on the way?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954526</id>
	<title>Re:So it's worthless, then?</title>
	<author>R2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1257154200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ebay &amp; skype w/o source code</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ebay &amp; skype w/o source code</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ebay &amp; skype w/o source code</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953824</id>
	<title>No surprise...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257194460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No surprise for me: They thought they would be able to cash in on the previous movies (ok, I'm ignoring Terminator 3 here), but failed miserably.<br> <br>
Terminator 4 was one of the worst movies of 2009, and the game... Don't get me talking about the game.<br> <br>
Hope some other company is more capable of revisiting this movie... then again, just let it die, and let us only remember T1 and T2</htmltext>
<tokenext>No surprise for me : They thought they would be able to cash in on the previous movies ( ok , I 'm ignoring Terminator 3 here ) , but failed miserably .
Terminator 4 was one of the worst movies of 2009 , and the game... Do n't get me talking about the game .
Hope some other company is more capable of revisiting this movie... then again , just let it die , and let us only remember T1 and T2</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No surprise for me: They thought they would be able to cash in on the previous movies (ok, I'm ignoring Terminator 3 here), but failed miserably.
Terminator 4 was one of the worst movies of 2009, and the game... Don't get me talking about the game.
Hope some other company is more capable of revisiting this movie... then again, just let it die, and let us only remember T1 and T2</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956208</id>
	<title>Re:I bid $1</title>
	<author>lena\_10326</author>
	<datestamp>1257161940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Where's the "Buy It Now!" link?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where 's the " Buy It Now !
" link ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where's the "Buy It Now!
" link?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.30004326</id>
	<title>"Good news everyone!"</title>
	<author>DarkEmpath</author>
	<datestamp>1257509700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can almost get your "Terminator: The Musical!"<br>
<br>
Checkout <a href="http://www.austriandeathmachine.com/" title="austriandeathmachine.com" rel="nofollow">Austrian Death Machine</a> [austriandeathmachine.com]. They're an Arnold impersonator band that sings songs like "Come with me if you want to live", "I need your clothes, your boots, and your motorcycle", and "I am a cybernetic organism, living tissue over (metal) endoskeleton". They also sing songs about his other movies, like "If it bleeds, we can kill it", "Get to the Choppa", and "It's not a tumor".<br>
<br>
Seriously, torrent their two albums, and if you like them, go buy them. I did<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can almost get your " Terminator : The Musical !
" Checkout Austrian Death Machine [ austriandeathmachine.com ] .
They 're an Arnold impersonator band that sings songs like " Come with me if you want to live " , " I need your clothes , your boots , and your motorcycle " , and " I am a cybernetic organism , living tissue over ( metal ) endoskeleton " .
They also sing songs about his other movies , like " If it bleeds , we can kill it " , " Get to the Choppa " , and " It 's not a tumor " .
Seriously , torrent their two albums , and if you like them , go buy them .
I did : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can almost get your "Terminator: The Musical!
"

Checkout Austrian Death Machine [austriandeathmachine.com].
They're an Arnold impersonator band that sings songs like "Come with me if you want to live", "I need your clothes, your boots, and your motorcycle", and "I am a cybernetic organism, living tissue over (metal) endoskeleton".
They also sing songs about his other movies, like "If it bleeds, we can kill it", "Get to the Choppa", and "It's not a tumor".
Seriously, torrent their two albums, and if you like them, go buy them.
I did :-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954150</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954378</id>
	<title>Re:So it's worthless, then?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257153600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Funny story about that. Back around '72 a novelist was finishing up a rather gruesome tale of a crazed Vietnam War veteran. It wasn't his first book, so he took some advice and hired a lawyer to write up a detailed publishing contract. Cost $500, which was big money back then, about a quarter of the price of a cheap new car. When he read the finished contract he got to the point where it covered "soft toy rights", and decided he'd just wasted $500.</p><p>The book was First Blood. Hollywood inverted the tale as Rambo. Author David Morell was an extremely rich man by the time he related that story in the late 80s, largely thanks to the "soft toy rights".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny story about that .
Back around '72 a novelist was finishing up a rather gruesome tale of a crazed Vietnam War veteran .
It was n't his first book , so he took some advice and hired a lawyer to write up a detailed publishing contract .
Cost $ 500 , which was big money back then , about a quarter of the price of a cheap new car .
When he read the finished contract he got to the point where it covered " soft toy rights " , and decided he 'd just wasted $ 500.The book was First Blood .
Hollywood inverted the tale as Rambo .
Author David Morell was an extremely rich man by the time he related that story in the late 80s , largely thanks to the " soft toy rights " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny story about that.
Back around '72 a novelist was finishing up a rather gruesome tale of a crazed Vietnam War veteran.
It wasn't his first book, so he took some advice and hired a lawyer to write up a detailed publishing contract.
Cost $500, which was big money back then, about a quarter of the price of a cheap new car.
When he read the finished contract he got to the point where it covered "soft toy rights", and decided he'd just wasted $500.The book was First Blood.
Hollywood inverted the tale as Rambo.
Author David Morell was an extremely rich man by the time he related that story in the late 80s, largely thanks to the "soft toy rights".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953936</id>
	<title>Re:First two films excluded...</title>
	<author>somersault</author>
	<datestamp>1257194820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought the first series was great. Summer Glau was a nice bonus of course. Second series got a bit slow in the middle, but it was picking up again towards the end.</p><p>I hope whoever buys up the rights continues TTSCC..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the first series was great .
Summer Glau was a nice bonus of course .
Second series got a bit slow in the middle , but it was picking up again towards the end.I hope whoever buys up the rights continues TTSCC. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the first series was great.
Summer Glau was a nice bonus of course.
Second series got a bit slow in the middle, but it was picking up again towards the end.I hope whoever buys up the rights continues TTSCC..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29957056</id>
	<title>Everything but the first two pimples?</title>
	<author>Ostracus</author>
	<datestamp>1257167040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>""Rebooting" popular franchises is all the rage these days in Hollywood. "</p><p>It seems to have worked for Star Trek: 90210.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" " Rebooting " popular franchises is all the rage these days in Hollywood .
" It seems to have worked for Star Trek : 90210 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>""Rebooting" popular franchises is all the rage these days in Hollywood.
"It seems to have worked for Star Trek: 90210.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954780</id>
	<title>Re:Whedon in the bidding</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257155400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wasnt funny at all. It was quite pointless really.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wasnt funny at all .
It was quite pointless really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasnt funny at all.
It was quite pointless really.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29959430</id>
	<title>How about The Evil Dead musical?</title>
	<author>vaporland</author>
	<datestamp>1257179940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It takes place in a cabin in the woods, it's comic, tragic and frightening, and it would translate well to Broadway...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It takes place in a cabin in the woods , it 's comic , tragic and frightening , and it would translate well to Broadway.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It takes place in a cabin in the woods, it's comic, tragic and frightening, and it would translate well to Broadway...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955930</id>
	<title>Re: sellaband?</title>
	<author>wiredlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1257160620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow. Their next gig is in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banff,\_Alberta" title="wikipedia.org">Banff Alberta</a> [wikipedia.org]. That's just... wow. Not a venue I envision PE playing at all. They'll be doing Branson soon enough it seems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow .
Their next gig is in Banff Alberta [ wikipedia.org ] .
That 's just... wow. Not a venue I envision PE playing at all .
They 'll be doing Branson soon enough it seems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow.
Their next gig is in Banff Alberta [wikipedia.org].
That's just... wow. Not a venue I envision PE playing at all.
They'll be doing Branson soon enough it seems.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29957486</id>
	<title>Re:First two films?</title>
	<author>DavidTC</author>
	<datestamp>1257168900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, did you even <b>see</b> the first movie? Why did you decide 'the basic message of series' was that you can change your fate? That held for <b>maybe</b> one movie, although it was really just them being optimistic.</p><p>
Trying to make sense of the time travel 'rules' in Terminators movies is stupid.</p><p>
The most logical assumption is that you can, in fact, change the future, but you can't change 'fate'. No matter what you do, you always have a Skynet and you always have John Connor fighting it and sending people back.</p><p>
This premise of time travel works for every movie and TV show and video game and whatnot. Anything else is just people making stuff up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , did you even see the first movie ?
Why did you decide 'the basic message of series ' was that you can change your fate ?
That held for maybe one movie , although it was really just them being optimistic .
Trying to make sense of the time travel 'rules ' in Terminators movies is stupid .
The most logical assumption is that you can , in fact , change the future , but you ca n't change 'fate' .
No matter what you do , you always have a Skynet and you always have John Connor fighting it and sending people back .
This premise of time travel works for every movie and TV show and video game and whatnot .
Anything else is just people making stuff up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, did you even see the first movie?
Why did you decide 'the basic message of series' was that you can change your fate?
That held for maybe one movie, although it was really just them being optimistic.
Trying to make sense of the time travel 'rules' in Terminators movies is stupid.
The most logical assumption is that you can, in fact, change the future, but you can't change 'fate'.
No matter what you do, you always have a Skynet and you always have John Connor fighting it and sending people back.
This premise of time travel works for every movie and TV show and video game and whatnot.
Anything else is just people making stuff up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961180</id>
	<title>Re:I bid $1</title>
	<author>beckett</author>
	<datestamp>1257241200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Give the Man a hand!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Give the Man a hand !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give the Man a hand!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955906</id>
	<title>Re: sellaband?</title>
	<author>jason.sweet</author>
	<datestamp>1257160500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Public Enemy and their new album</p></div><p>How does that go?<br>
ED!  How low can you go!<br>
Viagaro, what a brotha know.<br>
Back once again, it's incredible<br>
Shuffleboard animal.  D!<br>
Public Enemy Number One.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Public Enemy and their new albumHow does that go ?
ED ! How low can you go !
Viagaro , what a brotha know .
Back once again , it 's incredible Shuffleboard animal .
D ! Public Enemy Number One .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Public Enemy and their new albumHow does that go?
ED!  How low can you go!
Viagaro, what a brotha know.
Back once again, it's incredible
Shuffleboard animal.
D!
Public Enemy Number One.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954192</id>
	<title>It's a rights deal</title>
	<author>PCM2</author>
	<datestamp>1257152760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The winner of the auction does not get the rights to any profits from the first two films.</p><p>The winner <i>does,</i> on the other hand, get the right to do anything else with the rest of the entire franchise.</p><p>As I understand it, that could include sequels to <i>Terminator: Salvation</i> or the <i>Terminator 3</i> plotlines, continuations of the <i>Sarah Connor Chronicles</i> TV series, or entirely new series based in the universe. From the sound of it, they're even selling off licensing rights to all of these properties.</p><p>Still worthless, you say? According to TFA, the last time the <i>Terminator</i> franchise rights were sold, they went for $25 million. The purchaser used the rights to make <i>Terminator: Salvation,</i> which grossed $380 million worldwide. Not so bad.</p><p>(On the other hand, it's maybe worth noting that the rights to the <i>Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles</i> auctioned for more than twice what was paid for <i>Terminator</i>...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The winner of the auction does not get the rights to any profits from the first two films.The winner does , on the other hand , get the right to do anything else with the rest of the entire franchise.As I understand it , that could include sequels to Terminator : Salvation or the Terminator 3 plotlines , continuations of the Sarah Connor Chronicles TV series , or entirely new series based in the universe .
From the sound of it , they 're even selling off licensing rights to all of these properties.Still worthless , you say ?
According to TFA , the last time the Terminator franchise rights were sold , they went for $ 25 million .
The purchaser used the rights to make Terminator : Salvation , which grossed $ 380 million worldwide .
Not so bad .
( On the other hand , it 's maybe worth noting that the rights to the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles auctioned for more than twice what was paid for Terminator... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The winner of the auction does not get the rights to any profits from the first two films.The winner does, on the other hand, get the right to do anything else with the rest of the entire franchise.As I understand it, that could include sequels to Terminator: Salvation or the Terminator 3 plotlines, continuations of the Sarah Connor Chronicles TV series, or entirely new series based in the universe.
From the sound of it, they're even selling off licensing rights to all of these properties.Still worthless, you say?
According to TFA, the last time the Terminator franchise rights were sold, they went for $25 million.
The purchaser used the rights to make Terminator: Salvation, which grossed $380 million worldwide.
Not so bad.
(On the other hand, it's maybe worth noting that the rights to the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles auctioned for more than twice what was paid for Terminator...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955556</id>
	<title>Come on, is this surprising?</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1257159060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When the company has so little faith in the franchise that they hand over the latest film to the assclown best known for directing the "Charlie's Angels" remake, is there any doubt it is dying?</htmltext>
<tokenext>When the company has so little faith in the franchise that they hand over the latest film to the assclown best known for directing the " Charlie 's Angels " remake , is there any doubt it is dying ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When the company has so little faith in the franchise that they hand over the latest film to the assclown best known for directing the "Charlie's Angels" remake, is there any doubt it is dying?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955170</id>
	<title>Re:It's a rights deal</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1257157380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The purchaser used the rights to make Terminator: Salvation, which grossed $380 million worldwide. Not so bad.</p></div><p>Not for a movie that cost $200 million to make. By the time you factor in marketing, distribution, etc., the thing barely broke even.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The purchaser used the rights to make Terminator : Salvation , which grossed $ 380 million worldwide .
Not so bad.Not for a movie that cost $ 200 million to make .
By the time you factor in marketing , distribution , etc. , the thing barely broke even .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The purchaser used the rights to make Terminator: Salvation, which grossed $380 million worldwide.
Not so bad.Not for a movie that cost $200 million to make.
By the time you factor in marketing, distribution, etc., the thing barely broke even.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29962540</id>
	<title>Re:First two films?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257258300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Terminator had an interesting sci-fi plot. T2 was nothing but mindless action, which just bores me. I don't know why everyone loved #2 so much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Terminator had an interesting sci-fi plot .
T2 was nothing but mindless action , which just bores me .
I do n't know why everyone loved # 2 so much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Terminator had an interesting sci-fi plot.
T2 was nothing but mindless action, which just bores me.
I don't know why everyone loved #2 so much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955110</id>
	<title>Re: sellaband?</title>
	<author>RichardJenkins</author>
	<datestamp>1257157140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So if I own the rights to the characters, would I get anything at all from the continued popularity of the two good films?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So if I own the rights to the characters , would I get anything at all from the continued popularity of the two good films ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if I own the rights to the characters, would I get anything at all from the continued popularity of the two good films?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953798</id>
	<title>First two films?</title>
	<author>soupforare</author>
	<datestamp>1257194400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>They made more than two?</htmltext>
<tokenext>They made more than two ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They made more than two?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956304</id>
	<title>reboot</title>
	<author>Anomalyst</author>
	<datestamp>1257162420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have Harlan Ellison, script the reboot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have Harlan Ellison , script the reboot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have Harlan Ellison, script the reboot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956670</id>
	<title>Cleanliness</title>
	<author>halcyon1234</author>
	<datestamp>1257164640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I owned what now? Musta slipped between the couch cushions. Damn maids.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I owned what now ?
Musta slipped between the couch cushions .
Damn maids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I owned what now?
Musta slipped between the couch cushions.
Damn maids.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954866</id>
	<title>Re:First two films?</title>
	<author>Killeryugi</author>
	<datestamp>1257155820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why yes they did! Terminator 3: The Coming Storm was pretty good.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why yes they did !
Terminator 3 : The Coming Storm was pretty good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why yes they did!
Terminator 3: The Coming Storm was pretty good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954002</id>
	<title>Re:Everything but the first two films?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257195180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Rebooting" popular franchises is all the rage these days in Hollywood.  The Terminator franchise, despite the lesser acclaim of the last two (although they were still both quite profitable), is still a valuable brand with a built-in audience.  This means all anyone has to do is go to any random studio in Hollywood, tell them "I have the rights to the Terminator franchise and I want to make a new movie that 'reboots' the franchise" and they'll have to spend the next 6 months just counting all the money they'll be showered with.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Rebooting " popular franchises is all the rage these days in Hollywood .
The Terminator franchise , despite the lesser acclaim of the last two ( although they were still both quite profitable ) , is still a valuable brand with a built-in audience .
This means all anyone has to do is go to any random studio in Hollywood , tell them " I have the rights to the Terminator franchise and I want to make a new movie that 'reboots ' the franchise " and they 'll have to spend the next 6 months just counting all the money they 'll be showered with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Rebooting" popular franchises is all the rage these days in Hollywood.
The Terminator franchise, despite the lesser acclaim of the last two (although they were still both quite profitable), is still a valuable brand with a built-in audience.
This means all anyone has to do is go to any random studio in Hollywood, tell them "I have the rights to the Terminator franchise and I want to make a new movie that 'reboots' the franchise" and they'll have to spend the next 6 months just counting all the money they'll be showered with.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955648</id>
	<title>Re:Whedon in the bidding</title>
	<author>Conchobair</author>
	<datestamp>1257159540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A musical by Joss Whedon?!?  That could only wind up Horrible.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A musical by Joss Whedon ? ! ?
That could only wind up Horrible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A musical by Joss Whedon?!?
That could only wind up Horrible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954150</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886</id>
	<title>Whedon in the bidding</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257194700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.tvovermind.com/tv-news/joss-whedon-bids-10000-for-the-terminator-franchise-rights-in-typical-hilarious-whedon-fashion-complete-with-a-letter/12479" title="tvovermind.com" rel="nofollow">Joss Whedon has issued an open letter, bidding $10,000 for the franchise.</a> [tvovermind.com]</p><p>It's funny as hell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Joss Whedon has issued an open letter , bidding $ 10,000 for the franchise .
[ tvovermind.com ] It 's funny as hell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Joss Whedon has issued an open letter, bidding $10,000 for the franchise.
[tvovermind.com]It's funny as hell.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29959910</id>
	<title>Re:First two films?</title>
	<author>cgenman</author>
	<datestamp>1257184020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Halfway decent might be a stretch for T3.  Out of the entire thing, the only action scene worth watching was the amazing truck-through-building scene (and good on Arnie for funding that himself).  Nick Stahl and Claire Danes both struggled to draw anything out of their characters besides "terrified" and "morose."  In stark contrast to Arnie's relentless killing machine and Robert Patrick's secret stabbing machine of death, Kristanna Loken's secret weapon was apparently inflatable breasts.  Thanks, writers!  That's a surefire way to instill terror and respect in your audience.</p><p>The story lacked any of the humanizing elements of the first two films, and didn't utilize any of that universe in a particularly creative way (Like the T101 vs T1000 brawls).  Taken outside of the Terminator universe, it makes even less sense, alternating between "eh" quality action sequences to drippy and sometimes painful dialog.  It was an action film without much action, and an atmospheric film without any tension.</p><p>Personally, I'm glad to hear that the Terminator Franchise is getting auctioned off.  I doubt Cameron has the time or inclination to buy it back, but I do hope it goes into better hands.  That's a rich universe, just waiting for a skilled storyteller.  Jonathan Mostow was clearly not that person.  Neither was McG.  Hopefully the next person to direct the series won't be some cut-rate music video developer, and instead will go to someone that understands that all films are drawn together by the human element, not in spite of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Halfway decent might be a stretch for T3 .
Out of the entire thing , the only action scene worth watching was the amazing truck-through-building scene ( and good on Arnie for funding that himself ) .
Nick Stahl and Claire Danes both struggled to draw anything out of their characters besides " terrified " and " morose .
" In stark contrast to Arnie 's relentless killing machine and Robert Patrick 's secret stabbing machine of death , Kristanna Loken 's secret weapon was apparently inflatable breasts .
Thanks , writers !
That 's a surefire way to instill terror and respect in your audience.The story lacked any of the humanizing elements of the first two films , and did n't utilize any of that universe in a particularly creative way ( Like the T101 vs T1000 brawls ) .
Taken outside of the Terminator universe , it makes even less sense , alternating between " eh " quality action sequences to drippy and sometimes painful dialog .
It was an action film without much action , and an atmospheric film without any tension.Personally , I 'm glad to hear that the Terminator Franchise is getting auctioned off .
I doubt Cameron has the time or inclination to buy it back , but I do hope it goes into better hands .
That 's a rich universe , just waiting for a skilled storyteller .
Jonathan Mostow was clearly not that person .
Neither was McG .
Hopefully the next person to direct the series wo n't be some cut-rate music video developer , and instead will go to someone that understands that all films are drawn together by the human element , not in spite of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Halfway decent might be a stretch for T3.
Out of the entire thing, the only action scene worth watching was the amazing truck-through-building scene (and good on Arnie for funding that himself).
Nick Stahl and Claire Danes both struggled to draw anything out of their characters besides "terrified" and "morose.
"  In stark contrast to Arnie's relentless killing machine and Robert Patrick's secret stabbing machine of death, Kristanna Loken's secret weapon was apparently inflatable breasts.
Thanks, writers!
That's a surefire way to instill terror and respect in your audience.The story lacked any of the humanizing elements of the first two films, and didn't utilize any of that universe in a particularly creative way (Like the T101 vs T1000 brawls).
Taken outside of the Terminator universe, it makes even less sense, alternating between "eh" quality action sequences to drippy and sometimes painful dialog.
It was an action film without much action, and an atmospheric film without any tension.Personally, I'm glad to hear that the Terminator Franchise is getting auctioned off.
I doubt Cameron has the time or inclination to buy it back, but I do hope it goes into better hands.
That's a rich universe, just waiting for a skilled storyteller.
Jonathan Mostow was clearly not that person.
Neither was McG.
Hopefully the next person to direct the series won't be some cut-rate music video developer, and instead will go to someone that understands that all films are drawn together by the human element, not in spite of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955448</id>
	<title>Re:First two films excluded...</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1257158400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dude when are you going to accept that they raped Indy? Stop suppressing the memory, people, it really happened!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude when are you going to accept that they raped Indy ?
Stop suppressing the memory , people , it really happened !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude when are you going to accept that they raped Indy?
Stop suppressing the memory, people, it really happened!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953912</id>
	<title>Re: sellaband?</title>
	<author>dean.collins</author>
	<datestamp>1257194760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>how about we start a 'fans' sellaband capital raising for this.

I am sure there are more than 1 million fans who would put up $200 to be a part shareholder.

If it's good enugh for Public Enemy and their new album why not&gt;
<a href="http://deancollinsblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/public-enemy-sellaband.html" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://deancollinsblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/public-enemy-sellaband.html</a> [blogspot.com]


Cheers,
dean</htmltext>
<tokenext>how about we start a 'fans ' sellaband capital raising for this .
I am sure there are more than 1 million fans who would put up $ 200 to be a part shareholder .
If it 's good enugh for Public Enemy and their new album why not &gt; http : //deancollinsblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/public-enemy-sellaband.html [ blogspot.com ] Cheers , dean</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how about we start a 'fans' sellaband capital raising for this.
I am sure there are more than 1 million fans who would put up $200 to be a part shareholder.
If it's good enugh for Public Enemy and their new album why not&gt;
http://deancollinsblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/public-enemy-sellaband.html [blogspot.com]


Cheers,
dean</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954226</id>
	<title>Hasta la vista... baby</title>
	<author>fortapocalypse</author>
	<datestamp>1257152940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think this was posted just to gather good quotes, so thought I'd throw that in.

Seriously though, there is a lot left to be made off of this franchise. But does the sale include that silly short <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T2\_3-D:\_Battle\_Across\_Time" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Terminator 3D film</a> [wikipedia.org] shown at Universal? If not, then I'm out.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this was posted just to gather good quotes , so thought I 'd throw that in .
Seriously though , there is a lot left to be made off of this franchise .
But does the sale include that silly short Terminator 3D film [ wikipedia.org ] shown at Universal ?
If not , then I 'm out .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this was posted just to gather good quotes, so thought I'd throw that in.
Seriously though, there is a lot left to be made off of this franchise.
But does the sale include that silly short Terminator 3D film [wikipedia.org] shown at Universal?
If not, then I'm out.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955292</id>
	<title>Re:Whedon in the bidding</title>
	<author>Trogre</author>
	<datestamp>1257157740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is he, like 12 or something?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is he , like 12 or something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is he, like 12 or something?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954156</id>
	<title>Re:Worthless</title>
	<author>Trepidity</author>
	<datestamp>1257152640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As far as existing films, sure, but they're basically selling the right to make future "Terminator" movies/shows/videogames/sweaters/whatever, which is still worth something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As far as existing films , sure , but they 're basically selling the right to make future " Terminator " movies/shows/videogames/sweaters/whatever , which is still worth something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As far as existing films, sure, but they're basically selling the right to make future "Terminator" movies/shows/videogames/sweaters/whatever, which is still worth something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958768</id>
	<title>Re:It's a rights deal</title>
	<author>trawg</author>
	<datestamp>1257175080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Still worthless, you say? According to TFA, the last time the Terminator franchise rights were sold, they went for $25 million. The purchaser used the rights to make Terminator: Salvation, which grossed $380 million worldwide. Not so bad.</p></div><p> Well, depends on how much the movie cost to make on top of that as well, I guess<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Still worthless , you say ?
According to TFA , the last time the Terminator franchise rights were sold , they went for $ 25 million .
The purchaser used the rights to make Terminator : Salvation , which grossed $ 380 million worldwide .
Not so bad .
Well , depends on how much the movie cost to make on top of that as well , I guess : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Still worthless, you say?
According to TFA, the last time the Terminator franchise rights were sold, they went for $25 million.
The purchaser used the rights to make Terminator: Salvation, which grossed $380 million worldwide.
Not so bad.
Well, depends on how much the movie cost to make on top of that as well, I guess :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29969568</id>
	<title>TO paraphrase</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1257247920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll be broke.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll be broke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll be broke.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29960504</id>
	<title>Re:I'll fess up</title>
	<author>Doctor\_Jest</author>
	<datestamp>1257189600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I actually enjoyed the latest film as well.  I reserve my hatred for what Michael Baysplosion has done to Transformers.  The funny thing is, most of the "Terminator 1 and 2" purists are either unintentionally (or intentionally) whitewashing the plot holes from the first two films (3 was a plothole in itself... heh), and the Spielberg sized plot holes in Terminator:Salvation were about as acceptable as any in a rather complex universe (with time travel, reboots, etc.)  The first two films contradicted one another (I don't care how you squint, the T1000 going back in time was a bit of a stretch).  Even if you buy into the plausibility that the events of the first film are the catalyst for the 2nd, it stands to reason the future being altered enough that "the machines didn't get John/Sarah" wasn't a hindrance to the future development of Skynet (after the end of 2, we thought it was a whole new ballgame.. or so we were led to believe), and it actually \_enhanced\_ the time portal, if you believe T2's premise of the returning terminators.
<br> <br>
Perhaps I'm over-analyzing, but shit, that's how nerds do it... particularly sci-fi nerds.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)  (I mean, I've been having an ongoing discussion at lunch regarding fast v. slow zombies...)  For the record, I think any turned undead (i.e. not rising from the graves) can be fast, depending upon the circumstances they had in life (i.e. Roseanne Barr is not going to suddenly be Carl Lewis when she gets bitten...)   Yes, this sort of nonsense makes for great conversation over a microwave burrito.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)  And yes, I'm aware George Romero believes all zombies to be slow, shambling, husks...  I just don't agree with him 100\%.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I actually enjoyed the latest film as well .
I reserve my hatred for what Michael Baysplosion has done to Transformers .
The funny thing is , most of the " Terminator 1 and 2 " purists are either unintentionally ( or intentionally ) whitewashing the plot holes from the first two films ( 3 was a plothole in itself... heh ) , and the Spielberg sized plot holes in Terminator : Salvation were about as acceptable as any in a rather complex universe ( with time travel , reboots , etc .
) The first two films contradicted one another ( I do n't care how you squint , the T1000 going back in time was a bit of a stretch ) .
Even if you buy into the plausibility that the events of the first film are the catalyst for the 2nd , it stands to reason the future being altered enough that " the machines did n't get John/Sarah " was n't a hindrance to the future development of Skynet ( after the end of 2 , we thought it was a whole new ballgame.. or so we were led to believe ) , and it actually \ _enhanced \ _ the time portal , if you believe T2 's premise of the returning terminators .
Perhaps I 'm over-analyzing , but shit , that 's how nerds do it... particularly sci-fi nerds .
: - ) ( I mean , I 've been having an ongoing discussion at lunch regarding fast v. slow zombies... ) For the record , I think any turned undead ( i.e .
not rising from the graves ) can be fast , depending upon the circumstances they had in life ( i.e .
Roseanne Barr is not going to suddenly be Carl Lewis when she gets bitten... ) Yes , this sort of nonsense makes for great conversation over a microwave burrito .
: ) And yes , I 'm aware George Romero believes all zombies to be slow , shambling , husks... I just do n't agree with him 100 \ % .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I actually enjoyed the latest film as well.
I reserve my hatred for what Michael Baysplosion has done to Transformers.
The funny thing is, most of the "Terminator 1 and 2" purists are either unintentionally (or intentionally) whitewashing the plot holes from the first two films (3 was a plothole in itself... heh), and the Spielberg sized plot holes in Terminator:Salvation were about as acceptable as any in a rather complex universe (with time travel, reboots, etc.
)  The first two films contradicted one another (I don't care how you squint, the T1000 going back in time was a bit of a stretch).
Even if you buy into the plausibility that the events of the first film are the catalyst for the 2nd, it stands to reason the future being altered enough that "the machines didn't get John/Sarah" wasn't a hindrance to the future development of Skynet (after the end of 2, we thought it was a whole new ballgame.. or so we were led to believe), and it actually \_enhanced\_ the time portal, if you believe T2's premise of the returning terminators.
Perhaps I'm over-analyzing, but shit, that's how nerds do it... particularly sci-fi nerds.
:-)  (I mean, I've been having an ongoing discussion at lunch regarding fast v. slow zombies...)  For the record, I think any turned undead (i.e.
not rising from the graves) can be fast, depending upon the circumstances they had in life (i.e.
Roseanne Barr is not going to suddenly be Carl Lewis when she gets bitten...)   Yes, this sort of nonsense makes for great conversation over a microwave burrito.
:)  And yes, I'm aware George Romero believes all zombies to be slow, shambling, husks...  I just don't agree with him 100\%.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29959022</id>
	<title>Re:Whedon in the bidding</title>
	<author>sharkey</author>
	<datestamp>1257176400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it's as good as "Stop the Planet of the Apes, I Want to Get Off!", then I'm camping out for tickets.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it 's as good as " Stop the Planet of the Apes , I Want to Get Off !
" , then I 'm camping out for tickets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it's as good as "Stop the Planet of the Apes, I Want to Get Off!
", then I'm camping out for tickets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954150</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956468</id>
	<title>Always a catch</title>
	<author>Tarlus</author>
	<datestamp>1257163440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The auction will include rights to everything but the first two films.</p></div><p>Well then it's no good.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The auction will include rights to everything but the first two films.Well then it 's no good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The auction will include rights to everything but the first two films.Well then it's no good.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958866</id>
	<title>Darkhorse wins</title>
	<author>gatkinso</author>
	<datestamp>1257175560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When TvP comes out that is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When TvP comes out that is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When TvP comes out that is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961348</id>
	<title>Re:First two films excluded...</title>
	<author>TheLink</author>
	<datestamp>1257244020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; I do remember the MacGyver spinoff that Harrison Ford starred in, "crystal head" or something<br><br>MacGyver? I must have missed that one. I only caught the recent Tarzan spinoff with Harrison Ford where Tarzan Boy was swinging from tree to tree in a chase sequence at one point.<br><br>That was a terrible movie. I set my expectations low when I started watching, but I had to crank it down even lower when Tarzan Boy did his stuff.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I do remember the MacGyver spinoff that Harrison Ford starred in , " crystal head " or somethingMacGyver ?
I must have missed that one .
I only caught the recent Tarzan spinoff with Harrison Ford where Tarzan Boy was swinging from tree to tree in a chase sequence at one point.That was a terrible movie .
I set my expectations low when I started watching , but I had to crank it down even lower when Tarzan Boy did his stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I do remember the MacGyver spinoff that Harrison Ford starred in, "crystal head" or somethingMacGyver?
I must have missed that one.
I only caught the recent Tarzan spinoff with Harrison Ford where Tarzan Boy was swinging from tree to tree in a chase sequence at one point.That was a terrible movie.
I set my expectations low when I started watching, but I had to crank it down even lower when Tarzan Boy did his stuff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954416</id>
	<title>Re:First two films excluded...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257153660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...some of us are sure that there are only three Indy films.</p></div><p>Wait a second, there ARE only three Indy films.  Why do you mention that fact like it's some sort of controversy?  But I can understand how people could get confused.  Lead actors occasionally play other roles.</p><p>I do remember the MacGyver spinoff that Harrison Ford starred in, "crystal head" or something.   I understand that some people think that had something to do with the Jones franchise, since Ford was the lead character in all the Indy films.</p><p>But that's just confusion on their part, same as someone thinking that there was more than one "Die Hard" movie just because Willis starred in some other flicks, or that there are more than three Star Wars movies.</p><p>PS:  I'm not sure what they are selling off.  There are really two Terminator films.</p><p>Maybe they are trying to sell off "Summer Glau Show" off as part of the Terminator franchise (in which, if I could understand the plot, has something to do with her being a Terminator.  I'm not entirely sure, though, because people keep blathering and getting on screen and sometimes blocking a clear view of her.)  If so, that show can come back.  Keep her and the mom, drop the young dude who appears to be Anakin Skywalker as a kid or something (boy genius who whines a lot about some destiny).  Might sell a few ads on an off night and pay for itself if they don't try to spend too much time developing a cohesive plot or special effects that aren't wardrobe-related.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...some of us are sure that there are only three Indy films.Wait a second , there ARE only three Indy films .
Why do you mention that fact like it 's some sort of controversy ?
But I can understand how people could get confused .
Lead actors occasionally play other roles.I do remember the MacGyver spinoff that Harrison Ford starred in , " crystal head " or something .
I understand that some people think that had something to do with the Jones franchise , since Ford was the lead character in all the Indy films.But that 's just confusion on their part , same as someone thinking that there was more than one " Die Hard " movie just because Willis starred in some other flicks , or that there are more than three Star Wars movies.PS : I 'm not sure what they are selling off .
There are really two Terminator films.Maybe they are trying to sell off " Summer Glau Show " off as part of the Terminator franchise ( in which , if I could understand the plot , has something to do with her being a Terminator .
I 'm not entirely sure , though , because people keep blathering and getting on screen and sometimes blocking a clear view of her .
) If so , that show can come back .
Keep her and the mom , drop the young dude who appears to be Anakin Skywalker as a kid or something ( boy genius who whines a lot about some destiny ) .
Might sell a few ads on an off night and pay for itself if they do n't try to spend too much time developing a cohesive plot or special effects that are n't wardrobe-related .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...some of us are sure that there are only three Indy films.Wait a second, there ARE only three Indy films.
Why do you mention that fact like it's some sort of controversy?
But I can understand how people could get confused.
Lead actors occasionally play other roles.I do remember the MacGyver spinoff that Harrison Ford starred in, "crystal head" or something.
I understand that some people think that had something to do with the Jones franchise, since Ford was the lead character in all the Indy films.But that's just confusion on their part, same as someone thinking that there was more than one "Die Hard" movie just because Willis starred in some other flicks, or that there are more than three Star Wars movies.PS:  I'm not sure what they are selling off.
There are really two Terminator films.Maybe they are trying to sell off "Summer Glau Show" off as part of the Terminator franchise (in which, if I could understand the plot, has something to do with her being a Terminator.
I'm not entirely sure, though, because people keep blathering and getting on screen and sometimes blocking a clear view of her.
)  If so, that show can come back.
Keep her and the mom, drop the young dude who appears to be Anakin Skywalker as a kid or something (boy genius who whines a lot about some destiny).
Might sell a few ads on an off night and pay for itself if they don't try to spend too much time developing a cohesive plot or special effects that aren't wardrobe-related.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958586</id>
	<title>The Mainframe in the front row bids...</title>
	<author>Snufu</author>
	<datestamp>1257174120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>We would like to offer 70 trillion earth currency units for the rights to the Terminator franchise, including all media assets, merchandising rights, and sole possession of all time travel, computing, and robotics technology, and other sensitive T-xxx schematics. <br>We further promise not to use said knowledge for malevolent purposes.
<br> <br>
Sincerely,<br>
<br>
Skynet News Corp.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We would like to offer 70 trillion earth currency units for the rights to the Terminator franchise , including all media assets , merchandising rights , and sole possession of all time travel , computing , and robotics technology , and other sensitive T-xxx schematics .
We further promise not to use said knowledge for malevolent purposes .
Sincerely , Skynet News Corp .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We would like to offer 70 trillion earth currency units for the rights to the Terminator franchise, including all media assets, merchandising rights, and sole possession of all time travel, computing, and robotics technology, and other sensitive T-xxx schematics.
We further promise not to use said knowledge for malevolent purposes.
Sincerely,

Skynet News Corp.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955452</id>
	<title>Re:Does the state of California come with it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257158520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Naw, but we'll pay you to take the governator away. He has negative value.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Naw , but we 'll pay you to take the governator away .
He has negative value .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Naw, but we'll pay you to take the governator away.
He has negative value.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954168</id>
	<title>Re:Worthless</title>
	<author>megamerican</author>
	<datestamp>1257152700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>T-H-X eleven-thirty-eight will be taken into custody at a minimal monetary expenditure. Total operation cost: six thousand credits under budget. Congratulations. Be efficient, be happy.</p><p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066434/" title="imdb.com">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066434/</a> [imdb.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>T-H-X eleven-thirty-eight will be taken into custody at a minimal monetary expenditure .
Total operation cost : six thousand credits under budget .
Congratulations. Be efficient , be happy.http : //www.imdb.com/title/tt0066434/ [ imdb.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>T-H-X eleven-thirty-eight will be taken into custody at a minimal monetary expenditure.
Total operation cost: six thousand credits under budget.
Congratulations. Be efficient, be happy.http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066434/ [imdb.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954268</id>
	<title>Re:First two films excluded...</title>
	<author>petrus4</author>
	<datestamp>1257153120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I would prefer it to die, considering that since the second movie, what have we gotten? If it were not for a certain actresses connection to another cult fave who would have put up with the series? That was jump shark city.</p></div><p>James Cameron's canon ended with T2.  Although it's not shown in the film, at the end of the T2 novel, Connor and the Resistance succeed in beating Skynet.</p><p>Sarah dies in that novel as well.  She was with John almost up until the end of the war; it was only at about the second last engagement with the Machines, where she is killed on a supply run.</p><p>Cameron refused to be involved with T4; he made the comment that he'd said everything he wanted to say by the end of T2.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would prefer it to die , considering that since the second movie , what have we gotten ?
If it were not for a certain actresses connection to another cult fave who would have put up with the series ?
That was jump shark city.James Cameron 's canon ended with T2 .
Although it 's not shown in the film , at the end of the T2 novel , Connor and the Resistance succeed in beating Skynet.Sarah dies in that novel as well .
She was with John almost up until the end of the war ; it was only at about the second last engagement with the Machines , where she is killed on a supply run.Cameron refused to be involved with T4 ; he made the comment that he 'd said everything he wanted to say by the end of T2 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would prefer it to die, considering that since the second movie, what have we gotten?
If it were not for a certain actresses connection to another cult fave who would have put up with the series?
That was jump shark city.James Cameron's canon ended with T2.
Although it's not shown in the film, at the end of the T2 novel, Connor and the Resistance succeed in beating Skynet.Sarah dies in that novel as well.
She was with John almost up until the end of the war; it was only at about the second last engagement with the Machines, where she is killed on a supply run.Cameron refused to be involved with T4; he made the comment that he'd said everything he wanted to say by the end of T2.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29957446</id>
	<title>Re:First two films?</title>
	<author>JackieBrown</author>
	<datestamp>1257168720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I understand denying the second highlander since the following movies did as well.</p><p>I guess you can ignore the last 2 terminator movies if you count TSCC</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I understand denying the second highlander since the following movies did as well.I guess you can ignore the last 2 terminator movies if you count TSCC</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I understand denying the second highlander since the following movies did as well.I guess you can ignore the last 2 terminator movies if you count TSCC</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29969646</id>
	<title>Re:Accountants moved in and imagination moved out</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1257248160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When? when was that? There have always been people trying to use film to make high profits. They ahve always been a tool for making money.</p><p>Some people use it to create 'art', but so what? Don't be nostalgic. There was never an era a purity in film making.</p><p>The fact that these 'pieces of shit' can make many millions of dollars tend to mean people enjoy them.</p><p>You can enjoy a fun ride AND a good story.</p><p>And if you think the industry is bad now, it was a hell of a lot more abusive in the '30-'70s</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When ?
when was that ?
There have always been people trying to use film to make high profits .
They ahve always been a tool for making money.Some people use it to create 'art ' , but so what ?
Do n't be nostalgic .
There was never an era a purity in film making.The fact that these 'pieces of shit ' can make many millions of dollars tend to mean people enjoy them.You can enjoy a fun ride AND a good story.And if you think the industry is bad now , it was a hell of a lot more abusive in the '30-'70s</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When?
when was that?
There have always been people trying to use film to make high profits.
They ahve always been a tool for making money.Some people use it to create 'art', but so what?
Don't be nostalgic.
There was never an era a purity in film making.The fact that these 'pieces of shit' can make many millions of dollars tend to mean people enjoy them.You can enjoy a fun ride AND a good story.And if you think the industry is bad now, it was a hell of a lot more abusive in the '30-'70s</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955676</id>
	<title>Re:Does the state of California come with it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257159660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...or do you have to buy the governator separately?</p></div><p>That's actually an interesting question. I believe that they digitized Arnold after the third movie and they used a computerized model of him in the last one. So if someone purchased the franchise, do they also own the digital Arnold?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...or do you have to buy the governator separately ? That 's actually an interesting question .
I believe that they digitized Arnold after the third movie and they used a computerized model of him in the last one .
So if someone purchased the franchise , do they also own the digital Arnold ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...or do you have to buy the governator separately?That's actually an interesting question.
I believe that they digitized Arnold after the third movie and they used a computerized model of him in the last one.
So if someone purchased the franchise, do they also own the digital Arnold?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954244</id>
	<title>old news...</title>
	<author>garynuman</author>
	<datestamp>1257153000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Didn't Netcraft confirm that the Terminator franchise was dead awhile ago?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't Netcraft confirm that the Terminator franchise was dead awhile ago ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't Netcraft confirm that the Terminator franchise was dead awhile ago?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958650</id>
	<title>Re:It's a rights deal</title>
	<author>PCM2</author>
	<datestamp>1257174480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Not for a movie that cost $200 million to make. By the time you factor in marketing, distribution, etc., the thing barely broke even.</p></div><p>But of course, box office gross doesn't tell the whole story. There are also the subsidiary rights, sublicensing deals, and everything else: toys, videogames, comic books, T-shirts, Taco Bell collector's cups, maybe a ride at Six Flags. Trust me, if I owned the rights to the Terminator franchise, I would have earned a <i>lot</i> more money this year than I have.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not for a movie that cost $ 200 million to make .
By the time you factor in marketing , distribution , etc. , the thing barely broke even.But of course , box office gross does n't tell the whole story .
There are also the subsidiary rights , sublicensing deals , and everything else : toys , videogames , comic books , T-shirts , Taco Bell collector 's cups , maybe a ride at Six Flags .
Trust me , if I owned the rights to the Terminator franchise , I would have earned a lot more money this year than I have .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not for a movie that cost $200 million to make.
By the time you factor in marketing, distribution, etc., the thing barely broke even.But of course, box office gross doesn't tell the whole story.
There are also the subsidiary rights, sublicensing deals, and everything else: toys, videogames, comic books, T-shirts, Taco Bell collector's cups, maybe a ride at Six Flags.
Trust me, if I owned the rights to the Terminator franchise, I would have earned a lot more money this year than I have.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29963288</id>
	<title>T3</title>
	<author>Obel</author>
	<datestamp>1257262980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I was a kid I was obsessed with the first two Terminator films. I kept praying they'd make a Terminator 3.</p><p>Now I've seen it I want to go back in time to kill my younger self before I can grow up to have such destructive thoughts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was a kid I was obsessed with the first two Terminator films .
I kept praying they 'd make a Terminator 3.Now I 've seen it I want to go back in time to kill my younger self before I can grow up to have such destructive thoughts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was a kid I was obsessed with the first two Terminator films.
I kept praying they'd make a Terminator 3.Now I've seen it I want to go back in time to kill my younger self before I can grow up to have such destructive thoughts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954220</id>
	<title>Great example of the free market....again</title>
	<author>tacokill</author>
	<datestamp>1257152880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I love the idea, that in a capitalist economy, resources that are not used efficiently, get reallocated to live another day.
<br>
<br>
Let me explain...
<br>

Investor A buys the rights to the Terminator series years ago.  That turned out to be a bad investment because they couldn't make a profit on that purchase.  For that reason, and I am sure many others, the Investor that did this took huge losses and ultimately filed bankruptcy.
<br>
<br>
Here is where we break from "the way things used to work for over 230 yrs" to "Obama's change".  (sorry, the politics can not be avoided)
<br>
<br>
Instead of propping up this bad investment (insert whatever rationale you want), we force the Investor to declare bankruptcy.  As part of that process, the "assets" are put up for auction as creditors are paid as much as possible with the auction proceeds.  This is a beautiful system in how it works.   Nobody goes to prison.  Nobody dies.   Instead, the people who <b>should</b> take the hit (Investors) are the ones who actually take the hit and furthermore, the assets live to see another day (and another owner who might create MORE wealth out of this franchise).
<br>
<br>
Contrast this with all the shit going on around us here in the States and you'll have to forgive me if I am bit twitchy with my "Celebrate Capitalism" trigger finger.  It's just refreshing to know it's still around since everyone in charge seems to have forgotten...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I love the idea , that in a capitalist economy , resources that are not used efficiently , get reallocated to live another day .
Let me explain.. . Investor A buys the rights to the Terminator series years ago .
That turned out to be a bad investment because they could n't make a profit on that purchase .
For that reason , and I am sure many others , the Investor that did this took huge losses and ultimately filed bankruptcy .
Here is where we break from " the way things used to work for over 230 yrs " to " Obama 's change " .
( sorry , the politics can not be avoided ) Instead of propping up this bad investment ( insert whatever rationale you want ) , we force the Investor to declare bankruptcy .
As part of that process , the " assets " are put up for auction as creditors are paid as much as possible with the auction proceeds .
This is a beautiful system in how it works .
Nobody goes to prison .
Nobody dies .
Instead , the people who should take the hit ( Investors ) are the ones who actually take the hit and furthermore , the assets live to see another day ( and another owner who might create MORE wealth out of this franchise ) .
Contrast this with all the shit going on around us here in the States and you 'll have to forgive me if I am bit twitchy with my " Celebrate Capitalism " trigger finger .
It 's just refreshing to know it 's still around since everyone in charge seems to have forgotten.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love the idea, that in a capitalist economy, resources that are not used efficiently, get reallocated to live another day.
Let me explain...


Investor A buys the rights to the Terminator series years ago.
That turned out to be a bad investment because they couldn't make a profit on that purchase.
For that reason, and I am sure many others, the Investor that did this took huge losses and ultimately filed bankruptcy.
Here is where we break from "the way things used to work for over 230 yrs" to "Obama's change".
(sorry, the politics can not be avoided)


Instead of propping up this bad investment (insert whatever rationale you want), we force the Investor to declare bankruptcy.
As part of that process, the "assets" are put up for auction as creditors are paid as much as possible with the auction proceeds.
This is a beautiful system in how it works.
Nobody goes to prison.
Nobody dies.
Instead, the people who should take the hit (Investors) are the ones who actually take the hit and furthermore, the assets live to see another day (and another owner who might create MORE wealth out of this franchise).
Contrast this with all the shit going on around us here in the States and you'll have to forgive me if I am bit twitchy with my "Celebrate Capitalism" trigger finger.
It's just refreshing to know it's still around since everyone in charge seems to have forgotten...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29966306</id>
	<title>Re:First two films?</title>
	<author>Golddess</author>
	<datestamp>1257276540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That held for <b>maybe</b> one movie</p></div><p>Which is also half of the movies that really matter.<br>
<br>
No, I'm not talking about the "movies 3 and 4 don't exist" thing.  I'm referring to the fact that (to the best of my knowledge at least) James Cameron had nothing to do with movies 3 and 4.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That held for maybe one movieWhich is also half of the movies that really matter .
No , I 'm not talking about the " movies 3 and 4 do n't exist " thing .
I 'm referring to the fact that ( to the best of my knowledge at least ) James Cameron had nothing to do with movies 3 and 4 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That held for maybe one movieWhich is also half of the movies that really matter.
No, I'm not talking about the "movies 3 and 4 don't exist" thing.
I'm referring to the fact that (to the best of my knowledge at least) James Cameron had nothing to do with movies 3 and 4.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29957486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954398</id>
	<title>Re:So it's worthless, then?</title>
	<author>Woogiemonger</author>
	<datestamp>1257153660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You'd think for whoever owns the Terminator franchise, business would be a-boomin' on Judgement Day, when Skynet clicks to order.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'd think for whoever owns the Terminator franchise , business would be a-boomin ' on Judgement Day , when Skynet clicks to order .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'd think for whoever owns the Terminator franchise, business would be a-boomin' on Judgement Day, when Skynet clicks to order.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954224</id>
	<title>Re:So it's worthless, then?</title>
	<author>asdf7890</author>
	<datestamp>1257152940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><blockquote><div><p> The auction will include rights to everything but the first two films.</p></div></blockquote><p>
I don't get it. Why would someone pay for rights that exclude everything of value?</p></div><p>Maybe if you think you can somehow inject more value back into it, then trying to get hold of the franchise for a bargain price might be worth a little effort and expenditure in the long run.</p><p>Or, more likely, it'll be bought by someone who has no bright ideas or plans. They'll sit on it until other people have bright ideas (given the franchise still has a following and the first films are still held in the high esteem they are, people are going to be thinking about it) then sell/lease the rights to them for profit.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The auction will include rights to everything but the first two films .
I do n't get it .
Why would someone pay for rights that exclude everything of value ? Maybe if you think you can somehow inject more value back into it , then trying to get hold of the franchise for a bargain price might be worth a little effort and expenditure in the long run.Or , more likely , it 'll be bought by someone who has no bright ideas or plans .
They 'll sit on it until other people have bright ideas ( given the franchise still has a following and the first films are still held in the high esteem they are , people are going to be thinking about it ) then sell/lease the rights to them for profit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> The auction will include rights to everything but the first two films.
I don't get it.
Why would someone pay for rights that exclude everything of value?Maybe if you think you can somehow inject more value back into it, then trying to get hold of the franchise for a bargain price might be worth a little effort and expenditure in the long run.Or, more likely, it'll be bought by someone who has no bright ideas or plans.
They'll sit on it until other people have bright ideas (given the franchise still has a following and the first films are still held in the high esteem they are, people are going to be thinking about it) then sell/lease the rights to them for profit.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29965990</id>
	<title>Re:First two films excluded...</title>
	<author>camazotz</author>
	<datestamp>1257275160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I fail to understand those who decry the fourth Indy film. Honestly, I haven't seen or read an adequate explanation for this hatred, other than that the very particular filtered perceptions and expectations of that individual somehow are not fulfilled by the film in question. Just because you were not happy with the film does not mean you're interpretation of "what it should have been" was right. I am happy to remain in the camp of "people who do not get overly worked up about cinema and spend their time wrapped in vitriol about perceived injustices on film." It doesn't mean I can't recognize a bad movie when I see it...but this movie was most certainly not bad, nor did it fail to live up to my expectations of what an aging late 50's Indy would be like. Plus, it did something I felt was very significant, by keeping with the trend of the previous movies and showcasing the thematic pulp/adventure elements of the time period in question, complete with evil Russians, UFOs, atomic bombs and Fortean weirdness.

Anyway, not trying to convince the haters that this movie was more than they think of it, just saying that you're not actually right about how allegedly deplorable this film was; you're just confused by your childhood memories and your modern expectations coming in to conflict and making you feel all confused inside. The only way they could have make an Indy film that would have satisfied all would have been to reboot the franchise. I am sure the will, eventually, but it was nice to see Indy in his old age doing what he does best, fighting the good fight against fascists and commies in the name of fantasy archaeology. (As a real archaeologist, I can assure you that the four Indy films always have and always will and should be about fantasy archaeology. The real thing is considerably less exciting, I assure you. Plus, Indy's a terrible role model for leaving a good site "in situ.")</htmltext>
<tokenext>I fail to understand those who decry the fourth Indy film .
Honestly , I have n't seen or read an adequate explanation for this hatred , other than that the very particular filtered perceptions and expectations of that individual somehow are not fulfilled by the film in question .
Just because you were not happy with the film does not mean you 're interpretation of " what it should have been " was right .
I am happy to remain in the camp of " people who do not get overly worked up about cinema and spend their time wrapped in vitriol about perceived injustices on film .
" It does n't mean I ca n't recognize a bad movie when I see it...but this movie was most certainly not bad , nor did it fail to live up to my expectations of what an aging late 50 's Indy would be like .
Plus , it did something I felt was very significant , by keeping with the trend of the previous movies and showcasing the thematic pulp/adventure elements of the time period in question , complete with evil Russians , UFOs , atomic bombs and Fortean weirdness .
Anyway , not trying to convince the haters that this movie was more than they think of it , just saying that you 're not actually right about how allegedly deplorable this film was ; you 're just confused by your childhood memories and your modern expectations coming in to conflict and making you feel all confused inside .
The only way they could have make an Indy film that would have satisfied all would have been to reboot the franchise .
I am sure the will , eventually , but it was nice to see Indy in his old age doing what he does best , fighting the good fight against fascists and commies in the name of fantasy archaeology .
( As a real archaeologist , I can assure you that the four Indy films always have and always will and should be about fantasy archaeology .
The real thing is considerably less exciting , I assure you .
Plus , Indy 's a terrible role model for leaving a good site " in situ .
" )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I fail to understand those who decry the fourth Indy film.
Honestly, I haven't seen or read an adequate explanation for this hatred, other than that the very particular filtered perceptions and expectations of that individual somehow are not fulfilled by the film in question.
Just because you were not happy with the film does not mean you're interpretation of "what it should have been" was right.
I am happy to remain in the camp of "people who do not get overly worked up about cinema and spend their time wrapped in vitriol about perceived injustices on film.
" It doesn't mean I can't recognize a bad movie when I see it...but this movie was most certainly not bad, nor did it fail to live up to my expectations of what an aging late 50's Indy would be like.
Plus, it did something I felt was very significant, by keeping with the trend of the previous movies and showcasing the thematic pulp/adventure elements of the time period in question, complete with evil Russians, UFOs, atomic bombs and Fortean weirdness.
Anyway, not trying to convince the haters that this movie was more than they think of it, just saying that you're not actually right about how allegedly deplorable this film was; you're just confused by your childhood memories and your modern expectations coming in to conflict and making you feel all confused inside.
The only way they could have make an Indy film that would have satisfied all would have been to reboot the franchise.
I am sure the will, eventually, but it was nice to see Indy in his old age doing what he does best, fighting the good fight against fascists and commies in the name of fantasy archaeology.
(As a real archaeologist, I can assure you that the four Indy films always have and always will and should be about fantasy archaeology.
The real thing is considerably less exciting, I assure you.
Plus, Indy's a terrible role model for leaving a good site "in situ.
")</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958340</id>
	<title>Re:First two films excluded...</title>
	<author>DavidTC</author>
	<datestamp>1257172800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not shown at the end of the second film, but it <b>is</b> explained right at the start of the first film if you pay attention.</p><p>
It clearly says that the <b>final</b> battle would be fought here...tonight.</p><p>
Now, if Skynet had killed Connor retroactively, that would have been the final battle of humans, but that didn't happen, so that's not what it was talking about.</p><p>
No, Skynet only sends the terminator back because <b>it lost</b>. Human burst in, and it fired up the experimental time machine and it sends two terminators back. One to 1984 and one to 1995. (If you think about which was sent where, and what Skynet had to have know about each time, you'll realize it makes sense. Remember the first one managed to kill two Sarah Connors.)</p><p>
The humans quickly send Reese back, and then they quickly reprogram the other Arnold that's laying around and send him back too. </p><p>
Perhaps this was two different battles, or two different facilities, but anyway, the point is, the time machines were, essentially, the last stand before Skynet was defeated. (Logically, you don't want to let your enemies have access to your time machines, so they'd be almost as well protected as yourself.)</p><p>
I suspect that Skynet figured out altering the past was just as big a threat to it as anything else, hence the time machine being used only when it about to be defeated.</p><p>
If you're wondering about T3, that actually took place in a different future, after T2 moved judgment day. (Which means that Skynet was right about time travel being a threat to it, as the Skynet from the first two movies is essentially dead, or rather never existed.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not shown at the end of the second film , but it is explained right at the start of the first film if you pay attention .
It clearly says that the final battle would be fought here...tonight .
Now , if Skynet had killed Connor retroactively , that would have been the final battle of humans , but that did n't happen , so that 's not what it was talking about .
No , Skynet only sends the terminator back because it lost .
Human burst in , and it fired up the experimental time machine and it sends two terminators back .
One to 1984 and one to 1995 .
( If you think about which was sent where , and what Skynet had to have know about each time , you 'll realize it makes sense .
Remember the first one managed to kill two Sarah Connors .
) The humans quickly send Reese back , and then they quickly reprogram the other Arnold that 's laying around and send him back too .
Perhaps this was two different battles , or two different facilities , but anyway , the point is , the time machines were , essentially , the last stand before Skynet was defeated .
( Logically , you do n't want to let your enemies have access to your time machines , so they 'd be almost as well protected as yourself .
) I suspect that Skynet figured out altering the past was just as big a threat to it as anything else , hence the time machine being used only when it about to be defeated .
If you 're wondering about T3 , that actually took place in a different future , after T2 moved judgment day .
( Which means that Skynet was right about time travel being a threat to it , as the Skynet from the first two movies is essentially dead , or rather never existed .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not shown at the end of the second film, but it is explained right at the start of the first film if you pay attention.
It clearly says that the final battle would be fought here...tonight.
Now, if Skynet had killed Connor retroactively, that would have been the final battle of humans, but that didn't happen, so that's not what it was talking about.
No, Skynet only sends the terminator back because it lost.
Human burst in, and it fired up the experimental time machine and it sends two terminators back.
One to 1984 and one to 1995.
(If you think about which was sent where, and what Skynet had to have know about each time, you'll realize it makes sense.
Remember the first one managed to kill two Sarah Connors.
)
The humans quickly send Reese back, and then they quickly reprogram the other Arnold that's laying around and send him back too.
Perhaps this was two different battles, or two different facilities, but anyway, the point is, the time machines were, essentially, the last stand before Skynet was defeated.
(Logically, you don't want to let your enemies have access to your time machines, so they'd be almost as well protected as yourself.
)
I suspect that Skynet figured out altering the past was just as big a threat to it as anything else, hence the time machine being used only when it about to be defeated.
If you're wondering about T3, that actually took place in a different future, after T2 moved judgment day.
(Which means that Skynet was right about time travel being a threat to it, as the Skynet from the first two movies is essentially dead, or rather never existed.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961616</id>
	<title>Re:Does the state of California come with it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257248220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>very good. A political joke, you got an impolite expression on to the boards, and a news relevant joke. Slashdot Trifecta</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>very good .
A political joke , you got an impolite expression on to the boards , and a news relevant joke .
Slashdot Trifecta</tokentext>
<sentencetext>very good.
A political joke, you got an impolite expression on to the boards, and a news relevant joke.
Slashdot Trifecta</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954912</id>
	<title>Re:First two films?</title>
	<author>Virak</author>
	<datestamp>1257156000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The third movie was very fairly maligned. Sure, it might have been halfway decent by itself. But as the sequel to Terminator 2, which was basically perfection in action movie form, merely decent isn't enough. It completely shat all over the "they finally beat Skynet and saved humanity!" thing, the characters weren't as well developed, the story didn't have as much depth, it wasn't nearly as tight (T2 advanced the plot in basically every scene and certainly didn't put any to waste), the Terminator in it wasn't really likable (T1's was an unstoppable killing machine; T2's was an unstoppable killing machine <i>with a heart of gold</i>; T3's was just a dick), the action wasn't as good, and the movie simply had overall a significantly different (and <i>worse</i>) feel from either of the previous ones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The third movie was very fairly maligned .
Sure , it might have been halfway decent by itself .
But as the sequel to Terminator 2 , which was basically perfection in action movie form , merely decent is n't enough .
It completely shat all over the " they finally beat Skynet and saved humanity !
" thing , the characters were n't as well developed , the story did n't have as much depth , it was n't nearly as tight ( T2 advanced the plot in basically every scene and certainly did n't put any to waste ) , the Terminator in it was n't really likable ( T1 's was an unstoppable killing machine ; T2 's was an unstoppable killing machine with a heart of gold ; T3 's was just a dick ) , the action was n't as good , and the movie simply had overall a significantly different ( and worse ) feel from either of the previous ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The third movie was very fairly maligned.
Sure, it might have been halfway decent by itself.
But as the sequel to Terminator 2, which was basically perfection in action movie form, merely decent isn't enough.
It completely shat all over the "they finally beat Skynet and saved humanity!
" thing, the characters weren't as well developed, the story didn't have as much depth, it wasn't nearly as tight (T2 advanced the plot in basically every scene and certainly didn't put any to waste), the Terminator in it wasn't really likable (T1's was an unstoppable killing machine; T2's was an unstoppable killing machine with a heart of gold; T3's was just a dick), the action wasn't as good, and the movie simply had overall a significantly different (and worse) feel from either of the previous ones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29960096</id>
	<title>Re:Whedon in the bidding</title>
	<author>cgenman</author>
	<datestamp>1257185520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aliens vs Muppets<br>The Maltese Chestburster<br>The Tuskegee Aliens (sure to be an Oscar contender!)<br>Perfect Strangers 2: The Queen and The King of Queens</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aliens vs MuppetsThe Maltese ChestbursterThe Tuskegee Aliens ( sure to be an Oscar contender !
) Perfect Strangers 2 : The Queen and The King of Queens</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aliens vs MuppetsThe Maltese ChestbursterThe Tuskegee Aliens (sure to be an Oscar contender!
)Perfect Strangers 2: The Queen and The King of Queens</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956110</id>
	<title>Re:Whedon in the bidding</title>
	<author>kalirion</author>
	<datestamp>1257161460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>2) More Glau. Hey. There's a reason they're called "Summer" movies.</i></p><p>I could live with that...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2 ) More Glau .
Hey. There 's a reason they 're called " Summer " movies.I could live with that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2) More Glau.
Hey. There's a reason they're called "Summer" movies.I could live with that...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954414</id>
	<title>Re:Whedon in the bidding</title>
	<author>Thud457</author>
	<datestamp>1257153660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's what I thought they should have done with the "Alien" franchise after the second one. They already had the haunted house movie and the war movie, the next obvious step was the buddy cop movie and the musical. <i>Oh, and "Aliens on Ice" (they don't even need skates...)</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what I thought they should have done with the " Alien " franchise after the second one .
They already had the haunted house movie and the war movie , the next obvious step was the buddy cop movie and the musical .
Oh , and " Aliens on Ice " ( they do n't even need skates... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what I thought they should have done with the "Alien" franchise after the second one.
They already had the haunted house movie and the war movie, the next obvious step was the buddy cop movie and the musical.
Oh, and "Aliens on Ice" (they don't even need skates...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954150</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961222</id>
	<title>Arnold should buy it</title>
	<author>rainhill</author>
	<datestamp>1257241980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>period.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>period .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>period.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954176</id>
	<title>Re:So it's worthless, then?</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1257152700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll start the bidding at -$10,000,000, because removing all but the first two movies would actually ADD to the franchise's value.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll start the bidding at - $ 10,000,000 , because removing all but the first two movies would actually ADD to the franchise 's value .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll start the bidding at -$10,000,000, because removing all but the first two movies would actually ADD to the franchise's value.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955058</id>
	<title>Re:I bid $1</title>
	<author>goofyspouse</author>
	<datestamp>1257156900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good luck...you'll need it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good luck...you 'll need it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good luck...you'll need it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954340</id>
	<title>Re:Whedon in the bidding</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257153360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Terminator would be an awesome musical.  Not the least because, unlike "the lion king," there's no pretense.  There's no "this is filled with meaning and symbolism" (although there is a surprising amount of both in the first two films...) weighing it down with.. weighty..ness.</p><p>It would just be a raucous fun with over-the-top brass and stringed instruments, indoor fireworks, and an actual, working semi truck car chase on stage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Terminator would be an awesome musical .
Not the least because , unlike " the lion king , " there 's no pretense .
There 's no " this is filled with meaning and symbolism " ( although there is a surprising amount of both in the first two films... ) weighing it down with.. weighty..ness.It would just be a raucous fun with over-the-top brass and stringed instruments , indoor fireworks , and an actual , working semi truck car chase on stage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Terminator would be an awesome musical.
Not the least because, unlike "the lion king," there's no pretense.
There's no "this is filled with meaning and symbolism" (although there is a surprising amount of both in the first two films...) weighing it down with.. weighty..ness.It would just be a raucous fun with over-the-top brass and stringed instruments, indoor fireworks, and an actual, working semi truck car chase on stage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954150</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953816</id>
	<title>Does the state of California come with it?</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1257194460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...or do you have to buy the governator separately?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...or do you have to buy the governator separately ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...or do you have to buy the governator separately?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961086</id>
	<title>Re:First two films?</title>
	<author>Toonol</author>
	<datestamp>1257240000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>True, but the 2nd changed the basic message of the series from "you can't change your fate" to "you can change your fate".  I'm not sure why the 3rd should be more condemned than the second for that.  I don't particularly like the 3rd, but not for that reason.</htmltext>
<tokenext>True , but the 2nd changed the basic message of the series from " you ca n't change your fate " to " you can change your fate " .
I 'm not sure why the 3rd should be more condemned than the second for that .
I do n't particularly like the 3rd , but not for that reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True, but the 2nd changed the basic message of the series from "you can't change your fate" to "you can change your fate".
I'm not sure why the 3rd should be more condemned than the second for that.
I don't particularly like the 3rd, but not for that reason.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955464</id>
	<title>Re:Worthless</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1257158640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey, American Graffiti wasn't bad. I even liked the sequel.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , American Graffiti was n't bad .
I even liked the sequel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, American Graffiti wasn't bad.
I even liked the sequel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956644</id>
	<title>Re:Does the state of California come with it?</title>
	<author>Samgilljoy</author>
	<datestamp>1257164460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not just the legislature; it's the stupid freaking proposition process.  Time and again demagogues convince the ignorant populace to mandate a certain amount of spending on this or that.  Often, annual increases in spending are mandated regardless of changing revenues.  Just brilliant.  So,  at this point, about 85\% of our budget is locked without any legislation.  You simply cannot govern with so little control.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not just the legislature ; it 's the stupid freaking proposition process .
Time and again demagogues convince the ignorant populace to mandate a certain amount of spending on this or that .
Often , annual increases in spending are mandated regardless of changing revenues .
Just brilliant .
So , at this point , about 85 \ % of our budget is locked without any legislation .
You simply can not govern with so little control .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not just the legislature; it's the stupid freaking proposition process.
Time and again demagogues convince the ignorant populace to mandate a certain amount of spending on this or that.
Often, annual increases in spending are mandated regardless of changing revenues.
Just brilliant.
So,  at this point, about 85\% of our budget is locked without any legislation.
You simply cannot govern with so little control.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954796</id>
	<title>Re:Everything but the first two films?</title>
	<author>foo1752</author>
	<datestamp>1257155460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Forget "rebooting."  What they need to do is to combine franchises.  I'm anxiously awaiting the Alien vs. Terminator movie, myself.  Its set in the future after the Terminators have wiped out all of the humans.  Tag line: Alien vs. Terminator: Who ever wins, we're already dead, so we don't give a fuck anymore.  It's going to be huge!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget " rebooting .
" What they need to do is to combine franchises .
I 'm anxiously awaiting the Alien vs. Terminator movie , myself .
Its set in the future after the Terminators have wiped out all of the humans .
Tag line : Alien vs. Terminator : Who ever wins , we 're already dead , so we do n't give a fuck anymore .
It 's going to be huge !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget "rebooting.
"  What they need to do is to combine franchises.
I'm anxiously awaiting the Alien vs. Terminator movie, myself.
Its set in the future after the Terminators have wiped out all of the humans.
Tag line: Alien vs. Terminator: Who ever wins, we're already dead, so we don't give a fuck anymore.
It's going to be huge!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956170</id>
	<title>Let the Japanese buy it</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1257161820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Either we'll get something even better than all the movies combined or a remote-controlled, scaled-down, walking T800 toy robot.</p><p>Either way, we can't lose!</p><p>P.S.: if Honda or Toyota buys the rights, we're all dead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Either we 'll get something even better than all the movies combined or a remote-controlled , scaled-down , walking T800 toy robot.Either way , we ca n't lose ! P.S .
: if Honda or Toyota buys the rights , we 're all dead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Either we'll get something even better than all the movies combined or a remote-controlled, scaled-down, walking T800 toy robot.Either way, we can't lose!P.S.
: if Honda or Toyota buys the rights, we're all dead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29962830</id>
	<title>Re:Does the state of California come with it?</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1257260340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Inauthentic: You must use the word "fuck" at least once per paragraph.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Inauthentic : You must use the word " fuck " at least once per paragraph .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Inauthentic: You must use the word "fuck" at least once per paragraph.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954446</id>
	<title>What's not awesome?</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1257153840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Terminator the musical.  Rise of the machines on ice.  I'm a celebrity get me out of here but I'll be back.</p><p>I can hardly wait</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Terminator the musical .
Rise of the machines on ice .
I 'm a celebrity get me out of here but I 'll be back.I can hardly wait</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Terminator the musical.
Rise of the machines on ice.
I'm a celebrity get me out of here but I'll be back.I can hardly wait</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953882</id>
	<title>Re:I bid $1</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1257194700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You would get considerably more crossover cred with "I'd buy that for a dollar!"...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You would get considerably more crossover cred with " I 'd buy that for a dollar !
" .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You would get considerably more crossover cred with "I'd buy that for a dollar!
"...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961136</id>
	<title>Re:First two films excluded...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257240660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow !<br>You better pass me that doobie man<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow ! You better pass me that doobie man : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow !You better pass me that doobie man :-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954222</id>
	<title>Wow. They're desperate to balance the budget.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257152880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>California is even auctioning off their governor. Their budget problems must be really bad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>California is even auctioning off their governor .
Their budget problems must be really bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>California is even auctioning off their governor.
Their budget problems must be really bad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954012</id>
	<title>Terminators</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257195240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They'll be back...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll be back.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll be back...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954372</id>
	<title>My humble offer</title>
	<author>Groggnrath</author>
	<datestamp>1257153540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>To Halcyon (Re:Terminator), <br>
I would like to purchase your rights to the Terminator franchise. I hereto offer you two full and unused pockets full lint and or little bits of string. I feel that having seen the last set of movies, this is more than a fair bid. I'm willing to throw in up too, but not exceeding, one full fist full of dryer lint as a good faith payment.<br> <br>

Sincerely yours, Groggnrath (a devoted sci-fi fan).</htmltext>
<tokenext>To Halcyon ( Re : Terminator ) , I would like to purchase your rights to the Terminator franchise .
I hereto offer you two full and unused pockets full lint and or little bits of string .
I feel that having seen the last set of movies , this is more than a fair bid .
I 'm willing to throw in up too , but not exceeding , one full fist full of dryer lint as a good faith payment .
Sincerely yours , Groggnrath ( a devoted sci-fi fan ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To Halcyon (Re:Terminator), 
I would like to purchase your rights to the Terminator franchise.
I hereto offer you two full and unused pockets full lint and or little bits of string.
I feel that having seen the last set of movies, this is more than a fair bid.
I'm willing to throw in up too, but not exceeding, one full fist full of dryer lint as a good faith payment.
Sincerely yours, Groggnrath (a devoted sci-fi fan).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961454</id>
	<title>Accountants moved in and imagination moved out</title>
	<author>MrKaos</author>
	<datestamp>1257245940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Once upon a time movies were about creating a piece of art and the studios took a risk. Now that accountants are involved in eliminating the risk from the movie making business (now called franchises) they make perfectly polished pieces of shit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once upon a time movies were about creating a piece of art and the studios took a risk .
Now that accountants are involved in eliminating the risk from the movie making business ( now called franchises ) they make perfectly polished pieces of shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once upon a time movies were about creating a piece of art and the studios took a risk.
Now that accountants are involved in eliminating the risk from the movie making business (now called franchises) they make perfectly polished pieces of shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29975896</id>
	<title>Re:First two films?</title>
	<author>Elky Elk</author>
	<datestamp>1256988420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKCAGb6Pzcg" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKCAGb6Pzcg</a> [youtube.com]

The third was made by Merchant Ivory.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = IKCAGb6Pzcg [ youtube.com ] The third was made by Merchant Ivory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKCAGb6Pzcg [youtube.com]

The third was made by Merchant Ivory.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954034</id>
	<title>Re:Whedon in the bidding</title>
	<author>Daniel Dvorkin</author>
	<datestamp>1257195360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, that's probably the best thing that could possibly happen to it at this point.  Too bad Whedon doesn't have the money for a real offer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , that 's probably the best thing that could possibly happen to it at this point .
Too bad Whedon does n't have the money for a real offer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, that's probably the best thing that could possibly happen to it at this point.
Too bad Whedon doesn't have the money for a real offer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29965876</id>
	<title>Re:First two films excluded...</title>
	<author>camazotz</author>
	<datestamp>1257274560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your summary of the films have finally put them in proper perspective for me, thanks!

I've always enjoyed the Terminator films....I'm not a rabid fan, so I have no loathing for the most recent one, either--it was a fun film, a few flaws overall, but fun--and I find that first two enjoyable but have carefully avoided looking back on them with rose colored glasses, and found that they still hold up rather well. I also loved the third movie more than I probably should, if only because it managed to inject a sense of desperation and doom in to the series that resonated well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your summary of the films have finally put them in proper perspective for me , thanks !
I 've always enjoyed the Terminator films....I 'm not a rabid fan , so I have no loathing for the most recent one , either--it was a fun film , a few flaws overall , but fun--and I find that first two enjoyable but have carefully avoided looking back on them with rose colored glasses , and found that they still hold up rather well .
I also loved the third movie more than I probably should , if only because it managed to inject a sense of desperation and doom in to the series that resonated well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your summary of the films have finally put them in proper perspective for me, thanks!
I've always enjoyed the Terminator films....I'm not a rabid fan, so I have no loathing for the most recent one, either--it was a fun film, a few flaws overall, but fun--and I find that first two enjoyable but have carefully avoided looking back on them with rose colored glasses, and found that they still hold up rather well.
I also loved the third movie more than I probably should, if only because it managed to inject a sense of desperation and doom in to the series that resonated well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954174</id>
	<title>I'll fess up</title>
	<author>BumpyCarrot</author>
	<datestamp>1257152700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I actually really liked the latest film. And I didn't hate *all* of the third film, I liked seeing Judgement Day happen. So this actually makes me a bit apprehensive<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:/</htmltext>
<tokenext>I actually really liked the latest film .
And I did n't hate * all * of the third film , I liked seeing Judgement Day happen .
So this actually makes me a bit apprehensive : /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I actually really liked the latest film.
And I didn't hate *all* of the third film, I liked seeing Judgement Day happen.
So this actually makes me a bit apprehensive :/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953820</id>
	<title>First two films excluded...</title>
	<author>Shivetya</author>
	<datestamp>1257194460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>from the same camp which some of us are sure that there are only three Indy films.</p><p>I would prefer it to die, considering that since the second movie, what have we gotten?  If it were not for a certain actresses connection to another cult fave who would have put up with the series?  That was jump shark city.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>from the same camp which some of us are sure that there are only three Indy films.I would prefer it to die , considering that since the second movie , what have we gotten ?
If it were not for a certain actresses connection to another cult fave who would have put up with the series ?
That was jump shark city .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>from the same camp which some of us are sure that there are only three Indy films.I would prefer it to die, considering that since the second movie, what have we gotten?
If it were not for a certain actresses connection to another cult fave who would have put up with the series?
That was jump shark city.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956296</id>
	<title>Re:Whedon in the bidding</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257162420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"2.) More Glau."</p><p>Heck, I'm only on reason #2 and I'm already sold.</p><p>Where do I send my donation cheque?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" 2 .
) More Glau .
" Heck , I 'm only on reason # 2 and I 'm already sold.Where do I send my donation cheque ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"2.
) More Glau.
"Heck, I'm only on reason #2 and I'm already sold.Where do I send my donation cheque?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29987336</id>
	<title>Re:First two films excluded...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256989860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you meant *two* Indiana Jones films. The hallmark of Jones was that he got by mainly on his skills, with a little bit of luck.  "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Prequel" was entirely the opposite (and to some extent, so was "Crystal Skull") - Jones survives mainly on luck and pure chance, and his reasoning, skills, and abilities aren't really a factor at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you meant * two * Indiana Jones films .
The hallmark of Jones was that he got by mainly on his skills , with a little bit of luck .
" Indiana Jones and the Temple of Prequel " was entirely the opposite ( and to some extent , so was " Crystal Skull " ) - Jones survives mainly on luck and pure chance , and his reasoning , skills , and abilities are n't really a factor at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you meant *two* Indiana Jones films.
The hallmark of Jones was that he got by mainly on his skills, with a little bit of luck.
"Indiana Jones and the Temple of Prequel" was entirely the opposite (and to some extent, so was "Crystal Skull") - Jones survives mainly on luck and pure chance, and his reasoning, skills, and abilities aren't really a factor at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29960048</id>
	<title>Re:Whedon in the bidding</title>
	<author>cgenman</author>
	<datestamp>1257185040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>$10,000 and 10 gross points could be much more profitable than a 60 million dollar bid if the series were in good hands.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>$ 10,000 and 10 gross points could be much more profitable than a 60 million dollar bid if the series were in good hands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>$10,000 and 10 gross points could be much more profitable than a 60 million dollar bid if the series were in good hands.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29972306</id>
	<title>Re:First two films excluded...</title>
	<author>Tim Doran</author>
	<datestamp>1257259680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude. You just Blew My Mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude .
You just Blew My Mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude.
You just Blew My Mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954464</id>
	<title>Re:Does the state of California come with it?</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1257153900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First of all I just want to make sure you<br>understand that California's economy isn't<br>controlled by the governor.  The legislature<br>killed off any hopes of a balanced budget.</p><p>You were obviously making a joke at the expense<br>of the state of California.  but it was just<br>unfunny and shitty.</p><p>Sincerely,</p><p>Arnold Schwarzenegger.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First of all I just want to make sure youunderstand that California 's economy isn'tcontrolled by the governor .
The legislaturekilled off any hopes of a balanced budget.You were obviously making a joke at the expenseof the state of California .
but it was justunfunny and shitty.Sincerely,Arnold Schwarzenegger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First of all I just want to make sure youunderstand that California's economy isn'tcontrolled by the governor.
The legislaturekilled off any hopes of a balanced budget.You were obviously making a joke at the expenseof the state of California.
but it was justunfunny and shitty.Sincerely,Arnold Schwarzenegger.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29959866</id>
	<title>Re:Sorry</title>
	<author>steelfood</author>
	<datestamp>1257183660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They did that <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0370263/" title="imdb.com">already.</a> [imdb.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They did that already .
[ imdb.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They did that already.
[imdb.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954240</id>
	<title>Cameron</title>
	<author>16K Ram Pack</author>
	<datestamp>1257153000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember reading something where he said he passed on T3 because he couldn't see a good story. The guy might be one of the biggest assholes in Hollywood, but I'm grateful that he didn't just do it for the cash.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember reading something where he said he passed on T3 because he could n't see a good story .
The guy might be one of the biggest assholes in Hollywood , but I 'm grateful that he did n't just do it for the cash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember reading something where he said he passed on T3 because he couldn't see a good story.
The guy might be one of the biggest assholes in Hollywood, but I'm grateful that he didn't just do it for the cash.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955186</id>
	<title>Re:Whedon in the bidding</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1257157440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Split it up however you like. Want to pay Ringo less? That's your call.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Split it up however you like .
Want to pay Ringo less ?
That 's your call .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Split it up however you like.
Want to pay Ringo less?
That's your call.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954712</id>
	<title>Re: sellaband?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257155160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It took Public Enemy about a month to get to the $60,000 mark on <a href="http://www.sellaband.com/publicenemy" title="sellaband.com" rel="nofollow">SellaBand.</a> [sellaband.com]  I think it would take a little longer to raise $60 million<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>It took Public Enemy about a month to get to the $ 60,000 mark on SellaBand .
[ sellaband.com ] I think it would take a little longer to raise $ 60 million : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It took Public Enemy about a month to get to the $60,000 mark on SellaBand.
[sellaband.com]  I think it would take a little longer to raise $60 million :-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956234</id>
	<title>Re:First two films?</title>
	<author>Sark666</author>
	<datestamp>1257162060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>T1 hammers home the point you can't change shit. Arnie comes back and a protector follows ensuring the birth of Cyberdine and of john connor. T2 is the exception implying they can change things but they don't.   T3 continues with the original vein of not being able to change anything, it's going to happen.  So I'm not sure what gave you that impression with the series...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>T1 hammers home the point you ca n't change shit .
Arnie comes back and a protector follows ensuring the birth of Cyberdine and of john connor .
T2 is the exception implying they can change things but they do n't .
T3 continues with the original vein of not being able to change anything , it 's going to happen .
So I 'm not sure what gave you that impression with the series.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>T1 hammers home the point you can't change shit.
Arnie comes back and a protector follows ensuring the birth of Cyberdine and of john connor.
T2 is the exception implying they can change things but they don't.
T3 continues with the original vein of not being able to change anything, it's going to happen.
So I'm not sure what gave you that impression with the series...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956074</id>
	<title>Re:Whedon in the bidding</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1257161280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Oh, and "Aliens on Ice"</p></div></blockquote><p>Actually that's the first step in making a pangalactic gargleblaster.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , and " Aliens on Ice " Actually that 's the first step in making a pangalactic gargleblaster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, and "Aliens on Ice"Actually that's the first step in making a pangalactic gargleblaster.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955944</id>
	<title>Re:Everything but the first two films?</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1257160680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Terminators vs Borgs: when worlds collide.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Terminators vs Borgs : when worlds collide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Terminators vs Borgs: when worlds collide.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955124</id>
	<title>Re:Whedon in the bidding</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257157200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like his ideas about LOTR, but I feel the concept would be improved with one word: Furries.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like his ideas about LOTR , but I feel the concept would be improved with one word : Furries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like his ideas about LOTR, but I feel the concept would be improved with one word: Furries.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954570</id>
	<title>Re:First two films?</title>
	<author>mattack2</author>
	<datestamp>1257154380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, and I think that the third movie is unfairly maligned.  It wasn't as good as the first two, but it was entertaining. (I haven't seen the 4th.)</p><p>I liked the tv show a lot too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , and I think that the third movie is unfairly maligned .
It was n't as good as the first two , but it was entertaining .
( I have n't seen the 4th .
) I liked the tv show a lot too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, and I think that the third movie is unfairly maligned.
It wasn't as good as the first two, but it was entertaining.
(I haven't seen the 4th.
)I liked the tv show a lot too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954092</id>
	<title>The scene at a garage sale...</title>
	<author>petrus4</author>
	<datestamp>1257152400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(Crowd of people walking around in the front yard of a surburban house, looking at various bits of household junk)</p><p>Customer: (Looking around)  Oh hey, what's this?  It looks like some sort of oversized metal action figure!</p><p>Homeowner:  That's a robot we've had down in the basement for a couple years now.  Has an interesting history.  Supposedly, it was thrown together by an unknown, but obviously brilliant <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles\_Bennett\_Dyson" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">computer scientist</a> [wikipedia.org] as a work project.  Shame about what happened to him.</p><p>Supposedly after he'd finished building the thing, it got loose.  There was this shotgun toting psycho of a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah\_Connor\_(Terminator)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">woman</a> [wikipedia.org] who the police found raving and screaming about how it was trying to murder her and her <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John\_Connor" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">kid</a> [wikipedia.org].  The police had a hell of a time taking her into custody; they've kept her sedated and locked up in a padded cell ever since.</p><p>Customer:  Sounds like an amazing story!  How much do you want for it?</p><p>Homeowner:  (Slowly, pausing)  $60 million.</p><p>Customer:  WHAT?!  But anyway...if anyone was even going to remotely consider paying that kind of money for it, it'd need to be able to do something beyond awesome!  So give me a demonstration!  How do I turn it on?</p><p>(Finds an old car battery and some jumper cables nearby, as other items for sale)</p><p>Hey, this'd work!</p><p>Homeowner:  I'm not sure that's such a good idea...</p><p>Customer:  It looks like just a kid's toy!  Except a bit bigger of course.  I'm sure it's perfectly safe!</p><p>(Applies cables to battery and T800, causing an explosion of sparks.  The T800 rises up slowly from its' previous sitting position, its' eyes beginning to glow red)</p><p>Homeowner:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( Crowd of people walking around in the front yard of a surburban house , looking at various bits of household junk ) Customer : ( Looking around ) Oh hey , what 's this ?
It looks like some sort of oversized metal action figure ! Homeowner : That 's a robot we 've had down in the basement for a couple years now .
Has an interesting history .
Supposedly , it was thrown together by an unknown , but obviously brilliant computer scientist [ wikipedia.org ] as a work project .
Shame about what happened to him.Supposedly after he 'd finished building the thing , it got loose .
There was this shotgun toting psycho of a woman [ wikipedia.org ] who the police found raving and screaming about how it was trying to murder her and her kid [ wikipedia.org ] .
The police had a hell of a time taking her into custody ; they 've kept her sedated and locked up in a padded cell ever since.Customer : Sounds like an amazing story !
How much do you want for it ? Homeowner : ( Slowly , pausing ) $ 60 million.Customer : WHAT ? !
But anyway...if anyone was even going to remotely consider paying that kind of money for it , it 'd need to be able to do something beyond awesome !
So give me a demonstration !
How do I turn it on ?
( Finds an old car battery and some jumper cables nearby , as other items for sale ) Hey , this 'd work ! Homeowner : I 'm not sure that 's such a good idea...Customer : It looks like just a kid 's toy !
Except a bit bigger of course .
I 'm sure it 's perfectly safe !
( Applies cables to battery and T800 , causing an explosion of sparks .
The T800 rises up slowly from its ' previous sitting position , its ' eyes beginning to glow red ) Homeowner : .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(Crowd of people walking around in the front yard of a surburban house, looking at various bits of household junk)Customer: (Looking around)  Oh hey, what's this?
It looks like some sort of oversized metal action figure!Homeowner:  That's a robot we've had down in the basement for a couple years now.
Has an interesting history.
Supposedly, it was thrown together by an unknown, but obviously brilliant computer scientist [wikipedia.org] as a work project.
Shame about what happened to him.Supposedly after he'd finished building the thing, it got loose.
There was this shotgun toting psycho of a woman [wikipedia.org] who the police found raving and screaming about how it was trying to murder her and her kid [wikipedia.org].
The police had a hell of a time taking her into custody; they've kept her sedated and locked up in a padded cell ever since.Customer:  Sounds like an amazing story!
How much do you want for it?Homeowner:  (Slowly, pausing)  $60 million.Customer:  WHAT?!
But anyway...if anyone was even going to remotely consider paying that kind of money for it, it'd need to be able to do something beyond awesome!
So give me a demonstration!
How do I turn it on?
(Finds an old car battery and some jumper cables nearby, as other items for sale)Hey, this'd work!Homeowner:  I'm not sure that's such a good idea...Customer:  It looks like just a kid's toy!
Except a bit bigger of course.
I'm sure it's perfectly safe!
(Applies cables to battery and T800, causing an explosion of sparks.
The T800 rises up slowly from its' previous sitting position, its' eyes beginning to glow red)Homeowner: ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954150</id>
	<title>Re:Whedon in the bidding</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1257152640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's wrong with idea for "Terminator: The Musical!"? I think that's the best idea ever to come out of Joss Whedon! With hit songs like "I'll be Bach!" and "Hasta la vista, baby, baby, baby!" how can it possibly fail?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's wrong with idea for " Terminator : The Musical ! " ?
I think that 's the best idea ever to come out of Joss Whedon !
With hit songs like " I 'll be Bach !
" and " Hasta la vista , baby , baby , baby !
" how can it possibly fail ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's wrong with idea for "Terminator: The Musical!"?
I think that's the best idea ever to come out of Joss Whedon!
With hit songs like "I'll be Bach!
" and "Hasta la vista, baby, baby, baby!
" how can it possibly fail?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953842</id>
	<title>Sarah Conner Chronicles</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1257194580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Was about the only good thing from the Terminator Franchise int he last 10 years.....</p><p>And that is Sad....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was about the only good thing from the Terminator Franchise int he last 10 years.....And that is Sad... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was about the only good thing from the Terminator Franchise int he last 10 years.....And that is Sad....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954118</id>
	<title>Re:So it's worthless, then?</title>
	<author>amoeba1911</author>
	<datestamp>1257152520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's a great idea... we should have pet stores that sells things that come out of pets and retain the rights to the pet themselves.<br>
<br>
They're basically selling the turd that spawned out of the success of the first two films.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a great idea... we should have pet stores that sells things that come out of pets and retain the rights to the pet themselves .
They 're basically selling the turd that spawned out of the success of the first two films .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a great idea... we should have pet stores that sells things that come out of pets and retain the rights to the pet themselves.
They're basically selling the turd that spawned out of the success of the first two films.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954140</id>
	<title>Arnold should buy this</title>
	<author>Crock23A</author>
	<datestamp>1257152580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If he has the cash lying around, he should totally buy the franchise and turn it into something halfway decent.... or bury it.

Too bad the buyer doesn't get the first two films.  They were the only part of this franchise that were actually good.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If he has the cash lying around , he should totally buy the franchise and turn it into something halfway decent.... or bury it .
Too bad the buyer does n't get the first two films .
They were the only part of this franchise that were actually good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If he has the cash lying around, he should totally buy the franchise and turn it into something halfway decent.... or bury it.
Too bad the buyer doesn't get the first two films.
They were the only part of this franchise that were actually good.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996</id>
	<title>So it's worthless, then?</title>
	<author>residieu</author>
	<datestamp>1257195120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> The auction will include rights to everything but the first two films.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>

I don't get it. Why would someone pay for rights that exclude everything of value?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The auction will include rights to everything but the first two films .
I do n't get it .
Why would someone pay for rights that exclude everything of value ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> The auction will include rights to everything but the first two films.
I don't get it.
Why would someone pay for rights that exclude everything of value?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29963798</id>
	<title>Re:First two films?</title>
	<author>Maxo-Texas</author>
	<datestamp>1257265680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I went back and have to agree that the first movie is a loop which they don't break out of.</p><p>I had merged the 2nd and 1st movie into one story by the time the 3rd movie came out.  The second movie had closed so solidly without a twist ending that really the story was done for me with a final message of "you can change your fate".  Rather than the second movie changing the point of the series, it made the point.</p><p>But then the 3rd movie flipped it all back and then it became, "what is the point of this series?"  If it is not about fate, changing or unchanging, then what other message is there?</p><p>I would have liked the last terminator movie a lot more if they had not blown the secret in the advertising campaign.  The concept was actually intriguing and they could have made it without violating canon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I went back and have to agree that the first movie is a loop which they do n't break out of.I had merged the 2nd and 1st movie into one story by the time the 3rd movie came out .
The second movie had closed so solidly without a twist ending that really the story was done for me with a final message of " you can change your fate " .
Rather than the second movie changing the point of the series , it made the point.But then the 3rd movie flipped it all back and then it became , " what is the point of this series ?
" If it is not about fate , changing or unchanging , then what other message is there ? I would have liked the last terminator movie a lot more if they had not blown the secret in the advertising campaign .
The concept was actually intriguing and they could have made it without violating canon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I went back and have to agree that the first movie is a loop which they don't break out of.I had merged the 2nd and 1st movie into one story by the time the 3rd movie came out.
The second movie had closed so solidly without a twist ending that really the story was done for me with a final message of "you can change your fate".
Rather than the second movie changing the point of the series, it made the point.But then the 3rd movie flipped it all back and then it became, "what is the point of this series?
"  If it is not about fate, changing or unchanging, then what other message is there?I would have liked the last terminator movie a lot more if they had not blown the secret in the advertising campaign.
The concept was actually intriguing and they could have made it without violating canon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29957486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953812</id>
	<title>Everything but the first two films?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257194460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So basically nothing? The latest films have been complete shit.</p><p>Fuck, most of the Terminator geeks I know refused to even buy the toys and other shit released along with the latest movies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So basically nothing ?
The latest films have been complete shit.Fuck , most of the Terminator geeks I know refused to even buy the toys and other shit released along with the latest movies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So basically nothing?
The latest films have been complete shit.Fuck, most of the Terminator geeks I know refused to even buy the toys and other shit released along with the latest movies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954262</id>
	<title>Too late, already sold</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257153120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Der Governator sold out to special interest years ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Der Governator sold out to special interest years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Der Governator sold out to special interest years ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953790</id>
	<title>I bid $1</title>
	<author>Hes Nikke</author>
	<datestamp>1257194340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>first bid!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>first bid !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>first bid!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956830</id>
	<title>Re:Does the state of California come with it?</title>
	<author>mrmeval</author>
	<datestamp>1257165660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It will be sold to the syfylus channel and the CGI'd bot will have neo-sex with an anaconda.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It will be sold to the syfylus channel and the CGI 'd bot will have neo-sex with an anaconda .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will be sold to the syfylus channel and the CGI'd bot will have neo-sex with an anaconda.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953864</id>
	<title>Worthless</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1257194640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Without the first two films, I doubt it would be worth even half of what TMNT was. It like telling someone they now own every Lucasfilm property, except for anything relating to Star Wars.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Without the first two films , I doubt it would be worth even half of what TMNT was .
It like telling someone they now own every Lucasfilm property , except for anything relating to Star Wars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Without the first two films, I doubt it would be worth even half of what TMNT was.
It like telling someone they now own every Lucasfilm property, except for anything relating to Star Wars.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954112</id>
	<title>Re:I bid $1</title>
	<author>farrellj</author>
	<datestamp>1257152460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought Harlan Ellison owned it!</p><p>see: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlan\_Ellison#Copyright\_suits" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlan\_Ellison#Copyright\_suits</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought Harlan Ellison owned it ! see : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlan \ _Ellison # Copyright \ _suits [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought Harlan Ellison owned it!see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlan\_Ellison#Copyright\_suits [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29962290</id>
	<title>Re:First two films excluded...</title>
	<author>haggisbrain</author>
	<datestamp>1257256200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>and then they quickly reprogram the other</p></div></blockquote><p>
Why would it have to be quickly if they have a time machine?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and then they quickly reprogram the other Why would it have to be quickly if they have a time machine ?
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and then they quickly reprogram the other
Why would it have to be quickly if they have a time machine?
;-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958340</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29957446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29987336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29959910
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961616
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29960504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.30004326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29959022
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956644
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29957056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29959430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956304
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29962830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29960048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29972306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29957486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29963798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29969746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29962290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29965990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29965876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955676
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29975896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29962540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29959866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29969646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29957486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29966306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_1739238_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29960096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_1739238.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29960504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_1739238.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953842
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_1739238.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_1739238.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954150
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954414
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29959430
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29960096
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956074
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29959866
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.30004326
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954340
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955648
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29959022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954034
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29960048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954780
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_1739238.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954220
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_1739238.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_1739238.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954240
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_1739238.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953912
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955906
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954712
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955930
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953882
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961180
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954112
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_1739238.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29987336
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954268
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958340
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29972306
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961136
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29965876
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29962290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954416
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961348
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29965990
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955448
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_1739238.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954002
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954796
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955944
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956304
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29957056
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_1739238.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954192
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958768
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29969746
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955170
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955958
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954224
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954526
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_1739238.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_1739238.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29969646
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_1739238.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954570
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955348
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956234
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29957486
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29963798
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29966306
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961086
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954912
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29959910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29957446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29975896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29962540
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_1739238.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954464
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29962830
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956644
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29961616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954262
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29956830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955452
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_1739238.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29953864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29954156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29955464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_1739238.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_1739238.29958586
</commentlist>
</conversation>
