<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_29_148259</id>
	<title>Thermonuclear Reactor To Use Coconut Shells</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1256828640000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>destinyland writes <i>"A key component of a $10 billion nuclear fusion plant <a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/articles/energy/coconut-futures-and-thermonuclear-fusion-power">is vintage 2002 Indonesian coconut-shell charcoal</a>. After a 20-year search, German researchers discovered that the coconut-shell charcoal is the best medium for 'adsorbing' waste byproducts sucked out of the thermonuclear reactor's vacuum chamber. In what will be the first fusion power facility that's commercially viable, magnetic fields will heat hydrogen isotopes to over 150 million degrees Centigrade. (Essentially, the super-hot plasma creates artificial stars.)  As the article points out, 'It's not quite a Starship warp drive, but it does harness the power of the sun.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>destinyland writes " A key component of a $ 10 billion nuclear fusion plant is vintage 2002 Indonesian coconut-shell charcoal .
After a 20-year search , German researchers discovered that the coconut-shell charcoal is the best medium for 'adsorbing ' waste byproducts sucked out of the thermonuclear reactor 's vacuum chamber .
In what will be the first fusion power facility that 's commercially viable , magnetic fields will heat hydrogen isotopes to over 150 million degrees Centigrade .
( Essentially , the super-hot plasma creates artificial stars .
) As the article points out , 'It 's not quite a Starship warp drive , but it does harness the power of the sun .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>destinyland writes "A key component of a $10 billion nuclear fusion plant is vintage 2002 Indonesian coconut-shell charcoal.
After a 20-year search, German researchers discovered that the coconut-shell charcoal is the best medium for 'adsorbing' waste byproducts sucked out of the thermonuclear reactor's vacuum chamber.
In what will be the first fusion power facility that's commercially viable, magnetic fields will heat hydrogen isotopes to over 150 million degrees Centigrade.
(Essentially, the super-hot plasma creates artificial stars.
)  As the article points out, 'It's not quite a Starship warp drive, but it does harness the power of the sun.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911151</id>
	<title>Re:Nuclear Waste?</title>
	<author>Megane</author>
	<datestamp>1256834220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After many years of use, the lining of a Tokamak core is supposed to get mildly radioactive. And there is no risk of a meltdown because it's hard enough just to keep the thing going in the first place.
</p><p>But right now, there isn't much nuclear waste being produced by fusion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After many years of use , the lining of a Tokamak core is supposed to get mildly radioactive .
And there is no risk of a meltdown because it 's hard enough just to keep the thing going in the first place .
But right now , there is n't much nuclear waste being produced by fusion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After many years of use, the lining of a Tokamak core is supposed to get mildly radioactive.
And there is no risk of a meltdown because it's hard enough just to keep the thing going in the first place.
But right now, there isn't much nuclear waste being produced by fusion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911011</id>
	<title>I just want to say...</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1256833680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's so freaking cool that there's going to be something man-made that will reach temperatures similar to the core of the sun. It's just... too cool. Hold on to your hat, god, 'cause here we come!<br> <br>

Ok, now back to mind-numbingly boring and disappointing reality...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's so freaking cool that there 's going to be something man-made that will reach temperatures similar to the core of the sun .
It 's just... too cool .
Hold on to your hat , god , 'cause here we come !
Ok , now back to mind-numbingly boring and disappointing reality.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's so freaking cool that there's going to be something man-made that will reach temperatures similar to the core of the sun.
It's just... too cool.
Hold on to your hat, god, 'cause here we come!
Ok, now back to mind-numbingly boring and disappointing reality...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29916543</id>
	<title>Best satay ever</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256811240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I usually cooked my satay (Indonesian/Malaysian kebab) using coconut charcoal. I am wondering what if I cook my satay on a Tokamak with that charcoal.. Yummy....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I usually cooked my satay ( Indonesian/Malaysian kebab ) using coconut charcoal .
I am wondering what if I cook my satay on a Tokamak with that charcoal.. Yummy... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I usually cooked my satay (Indonesian/Malaysian kebab) using coconut charcoal.
I am wondering what if I cook my satay on a Tokamak with that charcoal.. Yummy....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912565</id>
	<title>I found a radioactive waste "neutralizer."</title>
	<author>bwogowly</author>
	<datestamp>1256839260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know if fusion has radioactive waste since it deals with light elements, but, I found a business (watertorch.com) that says its product neutralizes radioactive waste. Why would we want to turn Hydrogen into Helium anyway, we can't remake it because it takes too high of temperatures. Therefore, we should stick with fission and neutralize the radioactive waste with the Water Torch.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know if fusion has radioactive waste since it deals with light elements , but , I found a business ( watertorch.com ) that says its product neutralizes radioactive waste .
Why would we want to turn Hydrogen into Helium anyway , we ca n't remake it because it takes too high of temperatures .
Therefore , we should stick with fission and neutralize the radioactive waste with the Water Torch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know if fusion has radioactive waste since it deals with light elements, but, I found a business (watertorch.com) that says its product neutralizes radioactive waste.
Why would we want to turn Hydrogen into Helium anyway, we can't remake it because it takes too high of temperatures.
Therefore, we should stick with fission and neutralize the radioactive waste with the Water Torch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911851</id>
	<title>Re:Yea so?</title>
	<author>Linker3000</author>
	<datestamp>1256836740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"We thought fusion power would save us after the oil ran out in 2023, but no-one predicted the coconut harvest failure of 2029 that threw the World's fusion reactors into darkness...."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" We thought fusion power would save us after the oil ran out in 2023 , but no-one predicted the coconut harvest failure of 2029 that threw the World 's fusion reactors into darkness.... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"We thought fusion power would save us after the oil ran out in 2023, but no-one predicted the coconut harvest failure of 2029 that threw the World's fusion reactors into darkness...."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910749</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910749</id>
	<title>Yea so?</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1256832780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Coconut shell charcoal is one of the best available for making filters.  Charcoal filters are nothing new folks most fish tanks use them as do most water purifiers and even gas masks.  And this "May" be a practical fusion reactor but they have been saying that since the 1950s but I am staying hopeful.<br>Yet another light and fluffy pop science story with a funny little twist because it has coconuts in it... Yawn.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Coconut shell charcoal is one of the best available for making filters .
Charcoal filters are nothing new folks most fish tanks use them as do most water purifiers and even gas masks .
And this " May " be a practical fusion reactor but they have been saying that since the 1950s but I am staying hopeful.Yet another light and fluffy pop science story with a funny little twist because it has coconuts in it... Yawn.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Coconut shell charcoal is one of the best available for making filters.
Charcoal filters are nothing new folks most fish tanks use them as do most water purifiers and even gas masks.
And this "May" be a practical fusion reactor but they have been saying that since the 1950s but I am staying hopeful.Yet another light and fluffy pop science story with a funny little twist because it has coconuts in it... Yawn.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910995</id>
	<title>Re:Nuclear Waste?</title>
	<author>confused one</author>
	<datestamp>1256833620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>deuterium is common in sea water.  Tritium is somewhat active and has a half-life of 10 years, through beta decay.  It's used, sealed in phosphor coated glass vials, for "self powered" illumination in watch dials, exit signs, gun sights, and so on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>deuterium is common in sea water .
Tritium is somewhat active and has a half-life of 10 years , through beta decay .
It 's used , sealed in phosphor coated glass vials , for " self powered " illumination in watch dials , exit signs , gun sights , and so on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>deuterium is common in sea water.
Tritium is somewhat active and has a half-life of 10 years, through beta decay.
It's used, sealed in phosphor coated glass vials, for "self powered" illumination in watch dials, exit signs, gun sights, and so on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917845</id>
	<title>Re:Power of the sun? Artificial stars?</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1256816580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And the Sun is powered by what? Burning tires?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the Sun is powered by what ?
Burning tires ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the Sun is powered by what?
Burning tires?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910695</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917821</id>
	<title>Re:Yea so?</title>
	<author>ikedasquid</author>
	<datestamp>1256816460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This isn't news...the Nuclear industry in the US has been using charcoal based on coconut shells to filter particulates for awhile.  This news is literally decades old.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't news...the Nuclear industry in the US has been using charcoal based on coconut shells to filter particulates for awhile .
This news is literally decades old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't news...the Nuclear industry in the US has been using charcoal based on coconut shells to filter particulates for awhile.
This news is literally decades old.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910749</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910879</id>
	<title>What</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1256833200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We have commercially viable <b>fusion</b> reactors now, yet the "news" is that it involves coconuts?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>In what <b>will be</b> the first fusion power facility that's commercially viable...</p></div><p>Oh.  I see.  3-5 years out then, just like LHC, battery breakthroughs, etc.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We have commercially viable fusion reactors now , yet the " news " is that it involves coconuts ? In what will be the first fusion power facility that 's commercially viable...Oh .
I see .
3-5 years out then , just like LHC , battery breakthroughs , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have commercially viable fusion reactors now, yet the "news" is that it involves coconuts?In what will be the first fusion power facility that's commercially viable...Oh.
I see.
3-5 years out then, just like LHC, battery breakthroughs, etc.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911065</id>
	<title>Re:Nuclear Waste?</title>
	<author>dmatos</author>
	<datestamp>1256833860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Deuterium is a stable isotope of hydrogen, and often used in small doses as a tracer in human medical applications.</p><p>Tritium is a beta-emitter, with a half-life of over 12 years.  The beta particles can cause cellular &amp; DNA damage in living tissue, but it can be stopped by a few millimetres of aluminum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Deuterium is a stable isotope of hydrogen , and often used in small doses as a tracer in human medical applications.Tritium is a beta-emitter , with a half-life of over 12 years .
The beta particles can cause cellular &amp; DNA damage in living tissue , but it can be stopped by a few millimetres of aluminum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Deuterium is a stable isotope of hydrogen, and often used in small doses as a tracer in human medical applications.Tritium is a beta-emitter, with a half-life of over 12 years.
The beta particles can cause cellular &amp; DNA damage in living tissue, but it can be stopped by a few millimetres of aluminum.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917535</id>
	<title>Yet More h+ Fiction</title>
	<author>DynaSoar</author>
	<datestamp>1256815080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't expect there to be any worth while reading from this source, unless one decides to treat it all as fiction and therefore entertainment. As far as I can tell, it's all either fiction or facts being used to support the fiction.</p><p>Last week clinical depression was a fun deficiency.</p><p>Now an experimental fusion reactor that might break even over an 8 minute run is 'commercially viable'.</p><p>The writers aren't just writing badly, they're making shit up badly. The editors can't tell or don't care.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't expect there to be any worth while reading from this source , unless one decides to treat it all as fiction and therefore entertainment .
As far as I can tell , it 's all either fiction or facts being used to support the fiction.Last week clinical depression was a fun deficiency.Now an experimental fusion reactor that might break even over an 8 minute run is 'commercially viable'.The writers are n't just writing badly , they 're making shit up badly .
The editors ca n't tell or do n't care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't expect there to be any worth while reading from this source, unless one decides to treat it all as fiction and therefore entertainment.
As far as I can tell, it's all either fiction or facts being used to support the fiction.Last week clinical depression was a fun deficiency.Now an experimental fusion reactor that might break even over an 8 minute run is 'commercially viable'.The writers aren't just writing badly, they're making shit up badly.
The editors can't tell or don't care.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910831</id>
	<title>Wow, so they finally split the coconut atom</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256833020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I was impressed when that Australian split the beer atom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I was impressed when that Australian split the beer atom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I was impressed when that Australian split the beer atom.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910909</id>
	<title>ARC Reactor???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256833260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it just me or does that reactor bear a striking resemblance to the ARC Reactor in Ironman?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me or does that reactor bear a striking resemblance to the ARC Reactor in Ironman ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me or does that reactor bear a striking resemblance to the ARC Reactor in Ironman?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29915715</id>
	<title>Re:Power of the sun? Artificial stars?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256808300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought that would be a horse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought that would be a horse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought that would be a horse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910945</id>
	<title>Re:Nuclear Waste?</title>
	<author>drerwk</author>
	<datestamp>1256833500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most fusion paths generate neutrons. The neutrons will make the walls of the reactor slightly radioactive for some value of slightly. Until we can do neutron free fusion there will still be a minor issue of waste.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most fusion paths generate neutrons .
The neutrons will make the walls of the reactor slightly radioactive for some value of slightly .
Until we can do neutron free fusion there will still be a minor issue of waste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most fusion paths generate neutrons.
The neutrons will make the walls of the reactor slightly radioactive for some value of slightly.
Until we can do neutron free fusion there will still be a minor issue of waste.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911833</id>
	<title>Giant Brita filter?</title>
	<author>loftling</author>
	<datestamp>1256836620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>So basically, they're using a giant Brita filter.
(Brita filters are made from coconut shells)

<a href="http://www.brita.net/uk/glossary\_aquazine2.html?&amp;no\_cache=1&amp;L=1&amp;range=&amp;lex=Activated+carbon" title="brita.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.brita.net/uk/glossary\_aquazine2.html?&amp;no\_cache=1&amp;L=1&amp;range=&amp;lex=Activated+carbon</a> [brita.net]</htmltext>
<tokenext>So basically , they 're using a giant Brita filter .
( Brita filters are made from coconut shells ) http : //www.brita.net/uk/glossary \ _aquazine2.html ? &amp;no \ _cache = 1&amp;L = 1&amp;range = &amp;lex = Activated + carbon [ brita.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So basically, they're using a giant Brita filter.
(Brita filters are made from coconut shells)

http://www.brita.net/uk/glossary\_aquazine2.html?&amp;no\_cache=1&amp;L=1&amp;range=&amp;lex=Activated+carbon [brita.net]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911615</id>
	<title>Not Centigrade, either.</title>
	<author>LordByronStyrofoam</author>
	<datestamp>1256835960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's 150M degrees <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron\_temperature" title="wikipedia.org">Electron Temperature</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's 150M degrees Electron Temperature [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's 150M degrees Electron Temperature [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912291</id>
	<title>Re:Thanks for finding me a tech website to ignore</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1256838180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was a direct quote lifted from TFA. You're lucky they even converted the double quotes to single quotes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was a direct quote lifted from TFA .
You 're lucky they even converted the double quotes to single quotes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was a direct quote lifted from TFA.
You're lucky they even converted the double quotes to single quotes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910829</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913449</id>
	<title>Activated Charcoal</title>
	<author>jbengt</author>
	<datestamp>1256842740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's been known for years that activated charcoal made from coconuts is the best commercially available adsorption material for filters.
Straight from the master construction specifications of a major airport:<p><div class="quote"><p>Media: (for both front/back access type and side-access type filters)<br>
1.	The absorbent medium shall be natural grain coconut shell activated carbon meeting the following requirements.  The contractor shall furnish a manufacturer's certificate that the carbon quality meets these requirements.<br>
	a.	Base material:	Natural grain, coconut shell carbon<br>
	b.	Activation method:	High temperature steam<br>
	c.	Absorption capacity:	High efficiency and capacity for removal of typical odors in concentrations normally associated with the occupied spaces.<br>
	d.	Absorption capacity:	60\% carbon tetrachloride, ASTM D-3467.<br>
	e.	Particle size distrib.:	U.S. screen - particles will be of a 4 x 8 mesh, with a maximum of 5\% remaining on the 4 mesh and a maximum of 5\% passing thru the 8 mesh.<br>
	f.	Bulk density:	0.48 to 0.54 grams per milliliter (29-34 lbs./cu. ft.) ASTM D-2854.<br>
	g.	Total sulfur content:	0.1\% maximum, by weight.<br>
	h.	Ash content:	5\% maximum, ASTM D-2866.<br>
	i.	Moisture content:	5\% maximum by weight, as packed, ASTM D-2867.<br>
	j.	Reactivatability:	Can be readily reactivated.<br>
	k.	Packaging:	The panel filling operation will utilize special equipment configured and fabricated to remove carbon fines and assure uniform packing density.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's been known for years that activated charcoal made from coconuts is the best commercially available adsorption material for filters .
Straight from the master construction specifications of a major airport : Media : ( for both front/back access type and side-access type filters ) 1 .
The absorbent medium shall be natural grain coconut shell activated carbon meeting the following requirements .
The contractor shall furnish a manufacturer 's certificate that the carbon quality meets these requirements .
a. Base material : Natural grain , coconut shell carbon b. Activation method : High temperature steam c. Absorption capacity : High efficiency and capacity for removal of typical odors in concentrations normally associated with the occupied spaces .
d. Absorption capacity : 60 \ % carbon tetrachloride , ASTM D-3467 .
e. Particle size distrib .
: U.S. screen - particles will be of a 4 x 8 mesh , with a maximum of 5 \ % remaining on the 4 mesh and a maximum of 5 \ % passing thru the 8 mesh .
f. Bulk density : 0.48 to 0.54 grams per milliliter ( 29-34 lbs./cu .
ft. ) ASTM D-2854 .
g. Total sulfur content : 0.1 \ % maximum , by weight .
h. Ash content : 5 \ % maximum , ASTM D-2866 .
i. Moisture content : 5 \ % maximum by weight , as packed , ASTM D-2867 .
j. Reactivatability : Can be readily reactivated .
k. Packaging : The panel filling operation will utilize special equipment configured and fabricated to remove carbon fines and assure uniform packing density .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's been known for years that activated charcoal made from coconuts is the best commercially available adsorption material for filters.
Straight from the master construction specifications of a major airport:Media: (for both front/back access type and side-access type filters)
1.
The absorbent medium shall be natural grain coconut shell activated carbon meeting the following requirements.
The contractor shall furnish a manufacturer's certificate that the carbon quality meets these requirements.
a.	Base material:	Natural grain, coconut shell carbon
	b.	Activation method:	High temperature steam
	c.	Absorption capacity:	High efficiency and capacity for removal of typical odors in concentrations normally associated with the occupied spaces.
d.	Absorption capacity:	60\% carbon tetrachloride, ASTM D-3467.
e.	Particle size distrib.
:	U.S. screen - particles will be of a 4 x 8 mesh, with a maximum of 5\% remaining on the 4 mesh and a maximum of 5\% passing thru the 8 mesh.
f.	Bulk density:	0.48 to 0.54 grams per milliliter (29-34 lbs./cu.
ft.) ASTM D-2854.
g.	Total sulfur content:	0.1\% maximum, by weight.
h.	Ash content:	5\% maximum, ASTM D-2866.
i.	Moisture content:	5\% maximum by weight, as packed, ASTM D-2867.
j.	Reactivatability:	Can be readily reactivated.
k.	Packaging:	The panel filling operation will utilize special equipment configured and fabricated to remove carbon fines and assure uniform packing density.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911673</id>
	<title>Re:Nuclear Waste?</title>
	<author>kidtexas</author>
	<datestamp>1256836140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A lot of people have responded to you and they have it mostly right.  Deuterium isn't harmful, tritium is.  The neutron flux is a serious problem, especially from a structural standpoint.  The reactor will become slowly neutron activated, or radioactive, and will need to be treated as low grade waste.  Also, once tritium is introduced into the system, people won't be able to go in the reactor for maintenance because of the tritium absorbed into everything, so remote handling will be required.  This is a separate issue from the neutron activation of the reactor though.</p><p>And no, no meltdown.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of people have responded to you and they have it mostly right .
Deuterium is n't harmful , tritium is .
The neutron flux is a serious problem , especially from a structural standpoint .
The reactor will become slowly neutron activated , or radioactive , and will need to be treated as low grade waste .
Also , once tritium is introduced into the system , people wo n't be able to go in the reactor for maintenance because of the tritium absorbed into everything , so remote handling will be required .
This is a separate issue from the neutron activation of the reactor though.And no , no meltdown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of people have responded to you and they have it mostly right.
Deuterium isn't harmful, tritium is.
The neutron flux is a serious problem, especially from a structural standpoint.
The reactor will become slowly neutron activated, or radioactive, and will need to be treated as low grade waste.
Also, once tritium is introduced into the system, people won't be able to go in the reactor for maintenance because of the tritium absorbed into everything, so remote handling will be required.
This is a separate issue from the neutron activation of the reactor though.And no, no meltdown.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910687</id>
	<title>Your official guide to the Jigaboo presidency</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256832480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congratulations on your purchase of a brand new nigger! If handled properly, your apeman will give years of valuable, if reluctant, service.</p><p>INSTALLING YOUR NIGGER.<br>You should install your nigger differently according to whether you have purchased the field or house model. Field niggers work best in a serial configuration, i.e. chained together. Chain your nigger to another nigger immediately after unpacking it, and don't even think about taking that chain off, ever. Many niggers start singing as soon as you put a chain on them. This habit can usually be thrashed out of them if nipped in the bud. House niggers work best as standalone units, but should be hobbled or hamstrung to prevent attempts at escape. At this stage, your nigger can also be given a name. Most owners use the same names over and over, since niggers become confused by too much data. Rufus, Rastus, Remus, Toby, Carslisle, Carlton, Hey-You!-Yes-you!, Yeller, Blackstar, and Sambo are all effective names for your new buck nigger. If your nigger is a ho, it should be called Latrelle, L'Tanya, or Jemima. Some owners call their nigger hoes Latrine for a joke. Pearl, Blossom, and Ivory are also righteous names for nigger hoes. These names go straight over your nigger's head, by the way.</p><p>CONFIGURING YOUR NIGGER<br>Owing to a design error, your nigger comes equipped with a tongue and vocal chords. Most niggers can master only a few basic human phrases with this apparatus - "muh dick" being the most popular. However, others make barking, yelping, yapping noises and appear to be in some pain, so you should probably call a vet and have him remove your nigger's tongue. Once de-tongued your nigger will be a lot happier - at least, you won't hear it complaining anywhere near as much. Niggers have nothing interesting to say, anyway. Many owners also castrate their niggers for health reasons (yours, mine, and that of women, not the nigger's). This is strongly recommended, and frankly, it's a mystery why this is not done on the boat</p><p>HOUSING YOUR NIGGER.<br>Your nigger can be accommodated in cages with stout iron bars. Make sure, however, that the bars are wide enough to push pieces of nigger food through. The rule of thumb is, four niggers per square yard of cage. So a fifteen foot by thirty foot nigger cage can accommodate two hundred niggers. You can site a nigger cage anywhere, even on soft ground. Don't worry about your nigger fashioning makeshift shovels out of odd pieces of wood and digging an escape tunnel under the bars of the cage. Niggers never invented the shovel before and they're not about to now. In any case, your nigger is certainly too lazy to attempt escape. As long as the free food holds out, your nigger is living better than it did in Africa, so it will stay put. Buck niggers and hoe niggers can be safely accommodated in the same cage, as bucks never attempt sex with black hoes.</p><p>FEEDING YOUR NIGGER.<br>Your Nigger likes fried chicken, corn bread, and watermelon. You should therefore give it none of these things because its lazy ass almost certainly doesn't deserve it. Instead, feed it on porridge with salt, and creek water. Your nigger will supplement its diet with whatever it finds in the fields, other niggers, etc. Experienced nigger owners sometimes push watermelon slices through the bars of the nigger cage at the end of the day as a treat, but only if all niggers have worked well and nothing has been stolen that day. Mike of the Old Ranch Plantation reports that this last one is a killer, since all niggers steal something almost every single day of their lives. He reports he doesn't have to spend much on free watermelon for his niggers as a result. You should never allow your nigger meal breaks while at work, since if it stops work for more than ten minutes it will need to be retrained. You would be surprised how long it takes to teach a nigger to pick cotton. You really would. Coffee beans? Don't ask. You have no idea.</p><p>MAKING YOUR NIGGER WORK.<br>Niggers are very, very averse to work of any kind. The nigger's most</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations on your purchase of a brand new nigger !
If handled properly , your apeman will give years of valuable , if reluctant , service.INSTALLING YOUR NIGGER.You should install your nigger differently according to whether you have purchased the field or house model .
Field niggers work best in a serial configuration , i.e .
chained together .
Chain your nigger to another nigger immediately after unpacking it , and do n't even think about taking that chain off , ever .
Many niggers start singing as soon as you put a chain on them .
This habit can usually be thrashed out of them if nipped in the bud .
House niggers work best as standalone units , but should be hobbled or hamstrung to prevent attempts at escape .
At this stage , your nigger can also be given a name .
Most owners use the same names over and over , since niggers become confused by too much data .
Rufus , Rastus , Remus , Toby , Carslisle , Carlton , Hey-You ! -Yes-you ! , Yeller , Blackstar , and Sambo are all effective names for your new buck nigger .
If your nigger is a ho , it should be called Latrelle , L'Tanya , or Jemima .
Some owners call their nigger hoes Latrine for a joke .
Pearl , Blossom , and Ivory are also righteous names for nigger hoes .
These names go straight over your nigger 's head , by the way.CONFIGURING YOUR NIGGEROwing to a design error , your nigger comes equipped with a tongue and vocal chords .
Most niggers can master only a few basic human phrases with this apparatus - " muh dick " being the most popular .
However , others make barking , yelping , yapping noises and appear to be in some pain , so you should probably call a vet and have him remove your nigger 's tongue .
Once de-tongued your nigger will be a lot happier - at least , you wo n't hear it complaining anywhere near as much .
Niggers have nothing interesting to say , anyway .
Many owners also castrate their niggers for health reasons ( yours , mine , and that of women , not the nigger 's ) .
This is strongly recommended , and frankly , it 's a mystery why this is not done on the boatHOUSING YOUR NIGGER.Your nigger can be accommodated in cages with stout iron bars .
Make sure , however , that the bars are wide enough to push pieces of nigger food through .
The rule of thumb is , four niggers per square yard of cage .
So a fifteen foot by thirty foot nigger cage can accommodate two hundred niggers .
You can site a nigger cage anywhere , even on soft ground .
Do n't worry about your nigger fashioning makeshift shovels out of odd pieces of wood and digging an escape tunnel under the bars of the cage .
Niggers never invented the shovel before and they 're not about to now .
In any case , your nigger is certainly too lazy to attempt escape .
As long as the free food holds out , your nigger is living better than it did in Africa , so it will stay put .
Buck niggers and hoe niggers can be safely accommodated in the same cage , as bucks never attempt sex with black hoes.FEEDING YOUR NIGGER.Your Nigger likes fried chicken , corn bread , and watermelon .
You should therefore give it none of these things because its lazy ass almost certainly does n't deserve it .
Instead , feed it on porridge with salt , and creek water .
Your nigger will supplement its diet with whatever it finds in the fields , other niggers , etc .
Experienced nigger owners sometimes push watermelon slices through the bars of the nigger cage at the end of the day as a treat , but only if all niggers have worked well and nothing has been stolen that day .
Mike of the Old Ranch Plantation reports that this last one is a killer , since all niggers steal something almost every single day of their lives .
He reports he does n't have to spend much on free watermelon for his niggers as a result .
You should never allow your nigger meal breaks while at work , since if it stops work for more than ten minutes it will need to be retrained .
You would be surprised how long it takes to teach a nigger to pick cotton .
You really would .
Coffee beans ?
Do n't ask .
You have no idea.MAKING YOUR NIGGER WORK.Niggers are very , very averse to work of any kind .
The nigger 's most</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations on your purchase of a brand new nigger!
If handled properly, your apeman will give years of valuable, if reluctant, service.INSTALLING YOUR NIGGER.You should install your nigger differently according to whether you have purchased the field or house model.
Field niggers work best in a serial configuration, i.e.
chained together.
Chain your nigger to another nigger immediately after unpacking it, and don't even think about taking that chain off, ever.
Many niggers start singing as soon as you put a chain on them.
This habit can usually be thrashed out of them if nipped in the bud.
House niggers work best as standalone units, but should be hobbled or hamstrung to prevent attempts at escape.
At this stage, your nigger can also be given a name.
Most owners use the same names over and over, since niggers become confused by too much data.
Rufus, Rastus, Remus, Toby, Carslisle, Carlton, Hey-You!-Yes-you!, Yeller, Blackstar, and Sambo are all effective names for your new buck nigger.
If your nigger is a ho, it should be called Latrelle, L'Tanya, or Jemima.
Some owners call their nigger hoes Latrine for a joke.
Pearl, Blossom, and Ivory are also righteous names for nigger hoes.
These names go straight over your nigger's head, by the way.CONFIGURING YOUR NIGGEROwing to a design error, your nigger comes equipped with a tongue and vocal chords.
Most niggers can master only a few basic human phrases with this apparatus - "muh dick" being the most popular.
However, others make barking, yelping, yapping noises and appear to be in some pain, so you should probably call a vet and have him remove your nigger's tongue.
Once de-tongued your nigger will be a lot happier - at least, you won't hear it complaining anywhere near as much.
Niggers have nothing interesting to say, anyway.
Many owners also castrate their niggers for health reasons (yours, mine, and that of women, not the nigger's).
This is strongly recommended, and frankly, it's a mystery why this is not done on the boatHOUSING YOUR NIGGER.Your nigger can be accommodated in cages with stout iron bars.
Make sure, however, that the bars are wide enough to push pieces of nigger food through.
The rule of thumb is, four niggers per square yard of cage.
So a fifteen foot by thirty foot nigger cage can accommodate two hundred niggers.
You can site a nigger cage anywhere, even on soft ground.
Don't worry about your nigger fashioning makeshift shovels out of odd pieces of wood and digging an escape tunnel under the bars of the cage.
Niggers never invented the shovel before and they're not about to now.
In any case, your nigger is certainly too lazy to attempt escape.
As long as the free food holds out, your nigger is living better than it did in Africa, so it will stay put.
Buck niggers and hoe niggers can be safely accommodated in the same cage, as bucks never attempt sex with black hoes.FEEDING YOUR NIGGER.Your Nigger likes fried chicken, corn bread, and watermelon.
You should therefore give it none of these things because its lazy ass almost certainly doesn't deserve it.
Instead, feed it on porridge with salt, and creek water.
Your nigger will supplement its diet with whatever it finds in the fields, other niggers, etc.
Experienced nigger owners sometimes push watermelon slices through the bars of the nigger cage at the end of the day as a treat, but only if all niggers have worked well and nothing has been stolen that day.
Mike of the Old Ranch Plantation reports that this last one is a killer, since all niggers steal something almost every single day of their lives.
He reports he doesn't have to spend much on free watermelon for his niggers as a result.
You should never allow your nigger meal breaks while at work, since if it stops work for more than ten minutes it will need to be retrained.
You would be surprised how long it takes to teach a nigger to pick cotton.
You really would.
Coffee beans?
Don't ask.
You have no idea.MAKING YOUR NIGGER WORK.Niggers are very, very averse to work of any kind.
The nigger's most</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911163</id>
	<title>It's Just Activated Carbon...</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1256834340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Boooooooring!</p><p>So they found the best activated carbon for their particular use comes from coconut shells. Why is this news?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Boooooooring ! So they found the best activated carbon for their particular use comes from coconut shells .
Why is this news ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boooooooring!So they found the best activated carbon for their particular use comes from coconut shells.
Why is this news?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911091</id>
	<title>Re:That's not a horse!</title>
	<author>ProteusQ</author>
	<datestamp>1256833980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How'd you \_get\_ the coconuts?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How 'd you \ _get \ _ the coconuts ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How'd you \_get\_ the coconuts?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910629</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910967</id>
	<title>commercially viable?</title>
	<author>sunking2</author>
	<datestamp>1256833560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If that were the case they'd be popping up all over. This place will never operate in the black. Not saying it isn't a starting point and shouldn't be done, but lets not sell it for something it isn't.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If that were the case they 'd be popping up all over .
This place will never operate in the black .
Not saying it is n't a starting point and should n't be done , but lets not sell it for something it is n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If that were the case they'd be popping up all over.
This place will never operate in the black.
Not saying it isn't a starting point and shouldn't be done, but lets not sell it for something it isn't.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911139</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, so they finally split the coconut atom</title>
	<author>furby076</author>
	<datestamp>1256834220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And I was impressed when that Australian split the beer atom.</p></div><p>Who?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And I was impressed when that Australian split the beer atom.Who ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I was impressed when that Australian split the beer atom.Who?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29918635</id>
	<title>Re:Right and wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256821500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>We're basically standing (or sitting) on nuclear waste from a star that went bang.</p></div></blockquote><p>We *are* nuclear waste from a star that went bang.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're basically standing ( or sitting ) on nuclear waste from a star that went bang.We * are * nuclear waste from a star that went bang .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're basically standing (or sitting) on nuclear waste from a star that went bang.We *are* nuclear waste from a star that went bang.
:-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911039</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29919165</id>
	<title>supply</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256824260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The real question is how many swallows are needed to supply the reactor and are they European or African?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The real question is how many swallows are needed to supply the reactor and are they European or African ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real question is how many swallows are needed to supply the reactor and are they European or African?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911319</id>
	<title>Re:Thanks for finding me a tech website to ignore</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256834940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If you're afraid your audience won't understand, then insert a sidebar on the mechanics of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adsorption" title="wikipedia.org">adsorption</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Behold the power of the web; no need for a sidebar!

</p><p>BTW, I thought they quoted the word as an alternate form of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sic" title="wikipedia.org"> <i>[sic]</i> </a> [wikipedia.org].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're afraid your audience wo n't understand , then insert a sidebar on the mechanics of adsorption [ wikipedia.org ] Behold the power of the web ; no need for a sidebar !
BTW , I thought they quoted the word as an alternate form of [ sic ] [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're afraid your audience won't understand, then insert a sidebar on the mechanics of adsorption [wikipedia.org]
Behold the power of the web; no need for a sidebar!
BTW, I thought they quoted the word as an alternate form of  [sic]  [wikipedia.org].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910829</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911829</id>
	<title>With apologies</title>
	<author>Stupid McStupidson</author>
	<datestamp>1256836620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>  You put the superheated hydrogen particles in the coconut, and adsorb it all up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You put the superheated hydrogen particles in the coconut , and adsorb it all up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  You put the superheated hydrogen particles in the coconut, and adsorb it all up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911391</id>
	<title>Its adsorption, no absorption</title>
	<author>starkadder</author>
	<datestamp>1256835180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>
The activated carbon adsorbs the waste, which means it gets trapped on the surface of the carbon, which has about 400 square meters of area per gram because it has so many micropores.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The activated carbon adsorbs the waste , which means it gets trapped on the surface of the carbon , which has about 400 square meters of area per gram because it has so many micropores .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
The activated carbon adsorbs the waste, which means it gets trapped on the surface of the carbon, which has about 400 square meters of area per gram because it has so many micropores.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29914109</id>
	<title>Re:I just want to say...</title>
	<author>careysub</author>
	<datestamp>1256845200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's so freaking cool that there's going to be something man-made that will reach temperatures similar to the core of the sun. It's just... too cool.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>Umm, this would be much hotter than the center of the Sun, by a factor of about 11 fold. The Sun only operates at about 13 million K.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's so freaking cool that there 's going to be something man-made that will reach temperatures similar to the core of the sun .
It 's just... too cool .
...Umm , this would be much hotter than the center of the Sun , by a factor of about 11 fold .
The Sun only operates at about 13 million K .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's so freaking cool that there's going to be something man-made that will reach temperatures similar to the core of the sun.
It's just... too cool.
...Umm, this would be much hotter than the center of the Sun, by a factor of about 11 fold.
The Sun only operates at about 13 million K.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911011</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911087</id>
	<title>Re:Nuclear Waste?</title>
	<author>CrimsonAvenger</author>
	<datestamp>1256833980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>My understanding is that this doesn't produce any nuclear waste at all, is that right?</p></div></blockquote><p>No.  It produces neutrons, so the material of the reactor will gradually become radioactive.
</p><p>In addition, things will become more brittle, and thus more prone to crack under stress.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My understanding is that this does n't produce any nuclear waste at all , is that right ? No .
It produces neutrons , so the material of the reactor will gradually become radioactive .
In addition , things will become more brittle , and thus more prone to crack under stress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My understanding is that this doesn't produce any nuclear waste at all, is that right?No.
It produces neutrons, so the material of the reactor will gradually become radioactive.
In addition, things will become more brittle, and thus more prone to crack under stress.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911841</id>
	<title>harnesses the power of the sun?</title>
	<author>hideouspenguinboy</author>
	<datestamp>1256836680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Big deal - so does my calculator.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Big deal - so does my calculator .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Big deal - so does my calculator.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917919</id>
	<title>The best charcoal....</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1256817000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...comes from cows. No, really. There are millions of cows in India, and observant Hindus consider it sacrilege to harm them. So they mostly die from old age, and there are no religious issues connected with recycling their remains. And it turns out that their bones, being extremely brittle, make excellent charcoal.</p><p>I found this out from a newspaper story a few years back. It was in the news because a British water company was using cow charcoal in its filters. Local vegetarians were not pleased.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...comes from cows .
No , really .
There are millions of cows in India , and observant Hindus consider it sacrilege to harm them .
So they mostly die from old age , and there are no religious issues connected with recycling their remains .
And it turns out that their bones , being extremely brittle , make excellent charcoal.I found this out from a newspaper story a few years back .
It was in the news because a British water company was using cow charcoal in its filters .
Local vegetarians were not pleased .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...comes from cows.
No, really.
There are millions of cows in India, and observant Hindus consider it sacrilege to harm them.
So they mostly die from old age, and there are no religious issues connected with recycling their remains.
And it turns out that their bones, being extremely brittle, make excellent charcoal.I found this out from a newspaper story a few years back.
It was in the news because a British water company was using cow charcoal in its filters.
Local vegetarians were not pleased.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911381</id>
	<title>Re:Thanks for finding me a tech website to ignore</title>
	<author>Kuroji</author>
	<datestamp>1256835120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...Right, actually different concepts. That'll teach me to post before I drink my coffee. Moving right along.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...Right , actually different concepts .
That 'll teach me to post before I drink my coffee .
Moving right along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Right, actually different concepts.
That'll teach me to post before I drink my coffee.
Moving right along.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911349</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910659</id>
	<title>Yeah, I saw this episode</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256832420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember this one.  The professor made the Thermonuclear reactor with a bunch of coconuts, financed, of course, by the Howell's... but then Gilligan saw Ginger...got all flustered and tripped over the whole thing causing a meltdown and the Skipper's hair to glow... yeah, that's a classic episode indeed</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember this one .
The professor made the Thermonuclear reactor with a bunch of coconuts , financed , of course , by the Howell 's... but then Gilligan saw Ginger...got all flustered and tripped over the whole thing causing a meltdown and the Skipper 's hair to glow... yeah , that 's a classic episode indeed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember this one.
The professor made the Thermonuclear reactor with a bunch of coconuts, financed, of course, by the Howell's... but then Gilligan saw Ginger...got all flustered and tripped over the whole thing causing a meltdown and the Skipper's hair to glow... yeah, that's a classic episode indeed</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911031</id>
	<title>Re:Power of the sun? Artificial stars?</title>
	<author>batquux</author>
	<datestamp>1256833800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fusion reactor? You've got two empty halves of a coconut and you're bangin' em together!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fusion reactor ?
You 've got two empty halves of a coconut and you 're bangin ' em together !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fusion reactor?
You've got two empty halves of a coconut and you're bangin' em together!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910695</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29915551</id>
	<title>Re:Nuclear Waste?</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1256807700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>My understanding is that this doesn't produce any nuclear waste at all, is that right?</p></div></blockquote><p>No, unfortunately.  The reaction produces neutrons, creating copious amounts of secondary waste.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My understanding is that this does n't produce any nuclear waste at all , is that right ? No , unfortunately .
The reaction produces neutrons , creating copious amounts of secondary waste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My understanding is that this doesn't produce any nuclear waste at all, is that right?No, unfortunately.
The reaction produces neutrons, creating copious amounts of secondary waste.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911225</id>
	<title>Re:Yea so?</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1256834580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LOL, I said <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1423517&amp;cid=29911163" title="slashdot.org">the same thing</a> [slashdot.org] (but I didn't notice your comment because you didn't mention activated carbon).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL , I said the same thing [ slashdot.org ] ( but I did n't notice your comment because you did n't mention activated carbon ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL, I said the same thing [slashdot.org] (but I didn't notice your comment because you didn't mention activated carbon).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910749</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910795</id>
	<title>Harnessing the power of the sun.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256832960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>My vintage Casio calculator harnessed the power of the sun. This, not so much.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My vintage Casio calculator harnessed the power of the sun .
This , not so much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My vintage Casio calculator harnessed the power of the sun.
This, not so much.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29915369</id>
	<title>Commercially viable?</title>
	<author>RealErmine</author>
	<datestamp>1256807040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I assume that by "commercially viable" they mean that there is a net gain from the reactor.  So what is the "coconut out" to "coconut in" ratio?  Time to sell your stock in Dole!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I assume that by " commercially viable " they mean that there is a net gain from the reactor .
So what is the " coconut out " to " coconut in " ratio ?
Time to sell your stock in Dole !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I assume that by "commercially viable" they mean that there is a net gain from the reactor.
So what is the "coconut out" to "coconut in" ratio?
Time to sell your stock in Dole!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911749</id>
	<title>Destiny</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256836320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"there's going to be something man-made that will reach temperatures similar to the core of the sun."</p><p>Wake me when they can make a spaceship that can survive in the core of a star (long enough to refuel even)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" there 's going to be something man-made that will reach temperatures similar to the core of the sun .
" Wake me when they can make a spaceship that can survive in the core of a star ( long enough to refuel even )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"there's going to be something man-made that will reach temperatures similar to the core of the sun.
"Wake me when they can make a spaceship that can survive in the core of a star (long enough to refuel even)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911011</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911239</id>
	<title>Don't piss off Milky Joe......</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1256834640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or he will hunt you down and frickin kill you for using his friends as Nuclear Waste absorbers....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or he will hunt you down and frickin kill you for using his friends as Nuclear Waste absorbers... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or he will hunt you down and frickin kill you for using his friends as Nuclear Waste absorbers....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910957</id>
	<title>"Commercially viable"?</title>
	<author>brian0918</author>
	<datestamp>1256833500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In other words, because it was funded by outside sources from around the world, rather than the people of the region where it will provide power, it will be able to compete against alternatives in the region. Of course, that would also be true of anything else.
<br> <br>
I've got some excellent windmills I'd like to sell you for 50 cents each - I just need to get global funding to the tune of $10B first.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In other words , because it was funded by outside sources from around the world , rather than the people of the region where it will provide power , it will be able to compete against alternatives in the region .
Of course , that would also be true of anything else .
I 've got some excellent windmills I 'd like to sell you for 50 cents each - I just need to get global funding to the tune of $ 10B first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other words, because it was funded by outside sources from around the world, rather than the people of the region where it will provide power, it will be able to compete against alternatives in the region.
Of course, that would also be true of anything else.
I've got some excellent windmills I'd like to sell you for 50 cents each - I just need to get global funding to the tune of $10B first.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912615</id>
	<title>Re:Thanks for finding me a tech website to ignore</title>
	<author>thickdiick</author>
	<datestamp>1256839440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hate wikitionary:
<br> <br> <tt>
adsorption (plural adsorptions)
The process by which a liquid or gas adsorbate is adsorbed by an adsorbent, forming a film on the adsorbent's surface.
</tt>
<br> <br> can someone please explain the difference! It's certainly not a common term in non-technical circles.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate wikitionary : adsorption ( plural adsorptions ) The process by which a liquid or gas adsorbate is adsorbed by an adsorbent , forming a film on the adsorbent 's surface .
can someone please explain the difference !
It 's certainly not a common term in non-technical circles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate wikitionary:
  
adsorption (plural adsorptions)
The process by which a liquid or gas adsorbate is adsorbed by an adsorbent, forming a film on the adsorbent's surface.
can someone please explain the difference!
It's certainly not a common term in non-technical circles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911685</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910843</id>
	<title>Re:Use Coconut Shells?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256833080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look At My Hearse (A GOMH Tribute)</p><p><a href="http://lookatmyhearse.googlepages.com/index.html" title="googlepages.com" rel="nofollow">http://lookatmyhearse.googlepages.com/index.html</a> [googlepages.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look At My Hearse ( A GOMH Tribute ) http : //lookatmyhearse.googlepages.com/index.html [ googlepages.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look At My Hearse (A GOMH Tribute)http://lookatmyhearse.googlepages.com/index.html [googlepages.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910619</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910633</id>
	<title>In related news...</title>
	<author>syrinx</author>
	<datestamp>1256832360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The head of the project, a former professor, was heard mumbling "Gilligan won't mess it up this time."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The head of the project , a former professor , was heard mumbling " Gilligan wo n't mess it up this time .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The head of the project, a former professor, was heard mumbling "Gilligan won't mess it up this time.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911039</id>
	<title>Right and wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256833800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fusion proponents carefully don't mention the effects of the fusion by-products on the reactor itself. It's the same with conventional thermal plants: the radioactive waste from the fuel rods isn't so bad, but the radiation converts some of the steel in the containment to radioactives (including the steel rods in the reinforced concrete.)<p>The solution of the Sun and other stars - spray the crap all over the Universe - is perhaps not the most environmentally friendly, but it's why we're here at all. We're basically standing (or sitting) on nuclear waste from a star that went bang.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fusion proponents carefully do n't mention the effects of the fusion by-products on the reactor itself .
It 's the same with conventional thermal plants : the radioactive waste from the fuel rods is n't so bad , but the radiation converts some of the steel in the containment to radioactives ( including the steel rods in the reinforced concrete .
) The solution of the Sun and other stars - spray the crap all over the Universe - is perhaps not the most environmentally friendly , but it 's why we 're here at all .
We 're basically standing ( or sitting ) on nuclear waste from a star that went bang .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fusion proponents carefully don't mention the effects of the fusion by-products on the reactor itself.
It's the same with conventional thermal plants: the radioactive waste from the fuel rods isn't so bad, but the radiation converts some of the steel in the containment to radioactives (including the steel rods in the reinforced concrete.
)The solution of the Sun and other stars - spray the crap all over the Universe - is perhaps not the most environmentally friendly, but it's why we're here at all.
We're basically standing (or sitting) on nuclear waste from a star that went bang.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910797</id>
	<title>Where can I buy that camera?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256832960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The camera they used to take a picture of the inside of the Tokamak "during operation" at 150 million C</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The camera they used to take a picture of the inside of the Tokamak " during operation " at 150 million C</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The camera they used to take a picture of the inside of the Tokamak "during operation" at 150 million C</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913177</id>
	<title>Just curious...</title>
	<author>volt\_man</author>
	<datestamp>1256841480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Will the coconuts be provided by an African or European swallow?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will the coconuts be provided by an African or European swallow ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will the coconuts be provided by an African or European swallow?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911553</id>
	<title>How many times?!?!?!?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256835720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok, for all the imperial measurers out there, it's Celsius, not Centigrade. It hasn't been Centigrade since 1948!</p><p>AC</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , for all the imperial measurers out there , it 's Celsius , not Centigrade .
It has n't been Centigrade since 1948 ! AC</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, for all the imperial measurers out there, it's Celsius, not Centigrade.
It hasn't been Centigrade since 1948!AC</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29915707</id>
	<title>Re:Right and wrong</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1256808300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The solution of the Sun and other stars - spray the crap all over the Universe - is perhaps not the most environmentally friendly, but it's why we're here at all. We're basically standing (or sitting) on nuclear waste from a star that went bang.</p></div></blockquote><p>Actually, the sun and other stars have two solutions to the problem of secondary waste.  One, there's no reactor chamber, thus nothing to become radioactive.  And, they use aneutronic reactions, so there's no neutrons to cause things to become radioactive either.  Even if the sun emitted neutrons, they don't last very long.</p><p>It's only at end-of-life that a star spews the crap all over the universe.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The solution of the Sun and other stars - spray the crap all over the Universe - is perhaps not the most environmentally friendly , but it 's why we 're here at all .
We 're basically standing ( or sitting ) on nuclear waste from a star that went bang.Actually , the sun and other stars have two solutions to the problem of secondary waste .
One , there 's no reactor chamber , thus nothing to become radioactive .
And , they use aneutronic reactions , so there 's no neutrons to cause things to become radioactive either .
Even if the sun emitted neutrons , they do n't last very long.It 's only at end-of-life that a star spews the crap all over the universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The solution of the Sun and other stars - spray the crap all over the Universe - is perhaps not the most environmentally friendly, but it's why we're here at all.
We're basically standing (or sitting) on nuclear waste from a star that went bang.Actually, the sun and other stars have two solutions to the problem of secondary waste.
One, there's no reactor chamber, thus nothing to become radioactive.
And, they use aneutronic reactions, so there's no neutrons to cause things to become radioactive either.
Even if the sun emitted neutrons, they don't last very long.It's only at end-of-life that a star spews the crap all over the universe.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911039</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911003</id>
	<title>Re:Power of the sun? Artificial stars?</title>
	<author>Plunky</author>
	<datestamp>1256833620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It's a fusion reaction. Just say that. No stars here, no power from the sun. Nuclear fusion.</p></div></blockquote><p>necessary spin is necessary</p><blockquote><div><p>.. Nuclear<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..</p></div></blockquote><p>"fear"</p><blockquote><div><p>.. power of the sun<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..</p></div></blockquote><p>"safe"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a fusion reaction .
Just say that .
No stars here , no power from the sun .
Nuclear fusion.necessary spin is necessary.. Nuclear .. " fear " .. power of the sun .. " safe "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a fusion reaction.
Just say that.
No stars here, no power from the sun.
Nuclear fusion.necessary spin is necessary.. Nuclear .."fear".. power of the sun .."safe"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910695</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917927</id>
	<title>Re:Power of the sun? Artificial stars?</title>
	<author>Frosty Piss</author>
	<datestamp>1256817060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's a fusion reaction.</p></div><p>I'll never eat day-old sushi again.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a fusion reaction.I 'll never eat day-old sushi again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a fusion reaction.I'll never eat day-old sushi again.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910695</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917555</id>
	<title>Re:commercially viable ?</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1256815200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are we talking WalMart or Neiman Marcus here?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we talking WalMart or Neiman Marcus here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we talking WalMart or Neiman Marcus here?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911107</id>
	<title>commercially viable ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256834100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>without knowing anything else, highly sceptical - thought commercially viable fusion years away</p><p>PS: all you guys jerking off over how "safe" fusion is - what do you know about the neutron flux, and radioactive embrittlement of the containment shell ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>without knowing anything else , highly sceptical - thought commercially viable fusion years awayPS : all you guys jerking off over how " safe " fusion is - what do you know about the neutron flux , and radioactive embrittlement of the containment shell ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>without knowing anything else, highly sceptical - thought commercially viable fusion years awayPS: all you guys jerking off over how "safe" fusion is - what do you know about the neutron flux, and radioactive embrittlement of the containment shell ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913115</id>
	<title>Re:Carbon shields used before, bad idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256841240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The carbon in the Windscale piles was the graphite MODERATOR. It was not there to "absorb neutron radiation" but to slow the neutrons to thermal speeds in order to enable the nuclear fission chain reaction to proceed. In no way was the carbon here acting as a "shield".</p><p>Quite a different matter entirely, putting aside the massive differences between a 1940s era fission reactor designed to make plutonium (not electricity) and a fusion demonstration reactor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The carbon in the Windscale piles was the graphite MODERATOR .
It was not there to " absorb neutron radiation " but to slow the neutrons to thermal speeds in order to enable the nuclear fission chain reaction to proceed .
In no way was the carbon here acting as a " shield " .Quite a different matter entirely , putting aside the massive differences between a 1940s era fission reactor designed to make plutonium ( not electricity ) and a fusion demonstration reactor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The carbon in the Windscale piles was the graphite MODERATOR.
It was not there to "absorb neutron radiation" but to slow the neutrons to thermal speeds in order to enable the nuclear fission chain reaction to proceed.
In no way was the carbon here acting as a "shield".Quite a different matter entirely, putting aside the massive differences between a 1940s era fission reactor designed to make plutonium (not electricity) and a fusion demonstration reactor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912301</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911457</id>
	<title>Re:commercially viable ?</title>
	<author>werfu</author>
	<datestamp>1256835420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fusion is still years away, but in a time frame much more reasonable than say an antimatter reactor. The first ITER estimate were talking about 2025. I think the last time I read about it, it was about 2034. We should be able to see it happens.

Also the fusion CAN be safe. The containment shell radio-active decay last about a hundred years and is way smaller than the by product of nuclear fission. The fusion waste should be handled as safely than fission waste.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fusion is still years away , but in a time frame much more reasonable than say an antimatter reactor .
The first ITER estimate were talking about 2025 .
I think the last time I read about it , it was about 2034 .
We should be able to see it happens .
Also the fusion CAN be safe .
The containment shell radio-active decay last about a hundred years and is way smaller than the by product of nuclear fission .
The fusion waste should be handled as safely than fission waste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fusion is still years away, but in a time frame much more reasonable than say an antimatter reactor.
The first ITER estimate were talking about 2025.
I think the last time I read about it, it was about 2034.
We should be able to see it happens.
Also the fusion CAN be safe.
The containment shell radio-active decay last about a hundred years and is way smaller than the by product of nuclear fission.
The fusion waste should be handled as safely than fission waste.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910929</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, I saw this episode</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1256833440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was Maryann that always made my coconuts radioactive. Those shorts!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was Maryann that always made my coconuts radioactive .
Those shorts ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was Maryann that always made my coconuts radioactive.
Those shorts!!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910659</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917971</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, I saw this episode</title>
	<author>the\_Bionic\_lemming</author>
	<datestamp>1256817300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope they have enough limes, because uou put the lime with the coconut and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>//ducks</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope they have enough limes , because uou put the lime with the coconut and //ducks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope they have enough limes, because uou put the lime with the coconut and //ducks</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910659</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910905</id>
	<title>MacGyver's turn</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1256833260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this trend keeps up, we'll finally get our MacGyver flying car.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this trend keeps up , we 'll finally get our MacGyver flying car .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this trend keeps up, we'll finally get our MacGyver flying car.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910659</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911237</id>
	<title>Harness the power of the Sun</title>
	<author>adisakp</author>
	<datestamp>1256834640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe the term for harvesting the power of the sun is solar energy.

And yes the Sun's energy is original from Fusion but under wildly different circumstances (crushing gravitational forces vs magnetic confinement).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe the term for harvesting the power of the sun is solar energy .
And yes the Sun 's energy is original from Fusion but under wildly different circumstances ( crushing gravitational forces vs magnetic confinement ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe the term for harvesting the power of the sun is solar energy.
And yes the Sun's energy is original from Fusion but under wildly different circumstances (crushing gravitational forces vs magnetic confinement).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910619</id>
	<title>Use Coconut Shells?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256832240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like a BRA!?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like a BRA !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like a BRA!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29919159</id>
	<title>Re:Power of the sun? Artificial stars?</title>
	<author>garompeta</author>
	<datestamp>1256824200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually the only thing that keeps us safe from the sun is the atmosphere and the magnetic poles of the Earth.<br> Anything outside our cocoon in space would kill us immediately.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually the only thing that keeps us safe from the sun is the atmosphere and the magnetic poles of the Earth .
Anything outside our cocoon in space would kill us immediately .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually the only thing that keeps us safe from the sun is the atmosphere and the magnetic poles of the Earth.
Anything outside our cocoon in space would kill us immediately.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911003</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911437</id>
	<title>Re:"Commercially viable"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256835360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's just confusion by the writer of the story.  This reactor is a scientific experiment, intended only to be the first to demonstrate getting more energy out of a fusion reactor than you have to put into it, not to be a commercially viable power plant.  So it's just one step towards the long hoped-for goal of commercially viable fusion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's just confusion by the writer of the story .
This reactor is a scientific experiment , intended only to be the first to demonstrate getting more energy out of a fusion reactor than you have to put into it , not to be a commercially viable power plant .
So it 's just one step towards the long hoped-for goal of commercially viable fusion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's just confusion by the writer of the story.
This reactor is a scientific experiment, intended only to be the first to demonstrate getting more energy out of a fusion reactor than you have to put into it, not to be a commercially viable power plant.
So it's just one step towards the long hoped-for goal of commercially viable fusion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910957</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911335</id>
	<title>Article recap</title>
	<author>pablo\_max</author>
	<datestamp>1256834940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> For those of you who dont want to read the article..this is what I got out of it....</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [wind]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [clop clop]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; ARTHUR:  Whoa there!<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [clop clop]</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #1:  Halt!  Who goes there?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; ARTHUR:  It is I, Christian Day, Scientist, from theKarlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany.  King of the physicist, defeator of the Saxons, sovereign<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; of all Germany!<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #1:  Pull the other one!<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; ARTHUR:  I am.  And this my trusty servant Lovelock.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; We have ridden the length and breadth of the land in search of knights<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; who will join me in my court of Camelot.  I must speak with your lord<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; and master.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #1:  What, ridden on a horse?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; ARTHUR:  Yes!<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #1:  You're using coconuts!<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; ARTHUR:  What?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #1:  You've got two empty halves of coconut and you're bangin'<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 'em together.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; ARTHUR:  So?  We have ridden since the snows of winter covered this<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; land, through the kingdom of Mercea, through--<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #1:  Where'd you get the coconut?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; ARTHUR:  We found them.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #1:  Found them?  In Mercea?  The coconut's tropical!<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; ARTHUR:  What do you mean?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #1:  Well, this is a temperate zone.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; ARTHUR:  The swallow may fly south with the sun or the house martin<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; or the plumber may seek warmer climes in winter yet these are not<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; strangers to our land.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #1:  Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; ARTHUR:  Not at all, they could be carried.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #1:  What -- a swallow carrying a coconut?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; ARTHUR:  It could grip it by the husk!<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #1:  It's not a question of where he grips it!  It's a simple<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; question of weight ratios!  A five ounce bird could not carry a 1 pound<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; coconut.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; ARTHUR:  Well, it doesn't matter.  Will you go and tell your master<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; that Christian Day of Germany is here!<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #1:  Listen, in order to maintain air-speed velocity, a swallow<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; needs to beat its wings 43 times every second, right?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; ARTHUR:  Please!<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #1:  Am I right?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; ARTHUR:  I'm not interested!<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #2:  It could be carried by an African swallow!<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #1:  Oh, yeah, an African swallow maybe, but not a European<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; swallow, that's my point.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #2:  Oh, yeah, I agree with that...<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; ARTHUR:  Will you ask your master if he wants to join my court<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany?!<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #1:  But then of course African swallows are not migratory.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #2:  Oh, yeah...<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #1:  So they couldn't bring a coconut back anyway...<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [clop clop]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #2:  Wait a minute -- supposing two swallows carried it together?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #1:  No, they'd have to have it on a line.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #2:  Well, simple!  They'd just use a standard creeper!<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #1:  What, held under the dorsal guiding feathers?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; GUARD #2:  Well, why not?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For those of you who dont want to read the article..this is what I got out of it... .             [ wind ]             [ clop clop ]     ARTHUR : Whoa there !
            [ clop clop ]     GUARD # 1 : Halt !
Who goes there ?
    ARTHUR : It is I , Christian Day , Scientist , from theKarlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany .
King of the physicist , defeator of the Saxons , sovereign             of all Germany !
    GUARD # 1 : Pull the other one !
    ARTHUR : I am .
And this my trusty servant Lovelock .
            We have ridden the length and breadth of the land in search of knights             who will join me in my court of Camelot .
I must speak with your lord             and master .
    GUARD # 1 : What , ridden on a horse ?
    ARTHUR : Yes !
    GUARD # 1 : You 're using coconuts !
    ARTHUR : What ?
    GUARD # 1 : You 've got two empty halves of coconut and you 're bangin '             'em together .
    ARTHUR : So ?
We have ridden since the snows of winter covered this             land , through the kingdom of Mercea , through--     GUARD # 1 : Where 'd you get the coconut ?
    ARTHUR : We found them .
    GUARD # 1 : Found them ?
In Mercea ?
The coconut 's tropical !
    ARTHUR : What do you mean ?
    GUARD # 1 : Well , this is a temperate zone .
    ARTHUR : The swallow may fly south with the sun or the house martin             or the plumber may seek warmer climes in winter yet these are not             strangers to our land .
    GUARD # 1 : Are you suggesting coconuts migrate ?
    ARTHUR : Not at all , they could be carried .
    GUARD # 1 : What -- a swallow carrying a coconut ?
    ARTHUR : It could grip it by the husk !
    GUARD # 1 : It 's not a question of where he grips it !
It 's a simple             question of weight ratios !
A five ounce bird could not carry a 1 pound             coconut .
    ARTHUR : Well , it does n't matter .
Will you go and tell your master             that Christian Day of Germany is here !
    GUARD # 1 : Listen , in order to maintain air-speed velocity , a swallow             needs to beat its wings 43 times every second , right ?
    ARTHUR : Please !
    GUARD # 1 : Am I right ?
    ARTHUR : I 'm not interested !
    GUARD # 2 : It could be carried by an African swallow !
    GUARD # 1 : Oh , yeah , an African swallow maybe , but not a European             swallow , that 's my point .
    GUARD # 2 : Oh , yeah , I agree with that.. .     ARTHUR : Will you ask your master if he wants to join my court             at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany ? !
    GUARD # 1 : But then of course African swallows are not migratory .
    GUARD # 2 : Oh , yeah.. .     GUARD # 1 : So they could n't bring a coconut back anyway.. .             [ clop clop ]     GUARD # 2 : Wait a minute -- supposing two swallows carried it together ?
    GUARD # 1 : No , they 'd have to have it on a line .
    GUARD # 2 : Well , simple !
They 'd just use a standard creeper !
    GUARD # 1 : What , held under the dorsal guiding feathers ?
    GUARD # 2 : Well , why not ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> For those of you who dont want to read the article..this is what I got out of it....
            [wind]
            [clop clop]
    ARTHUR:  Whoa there!
            [clop clop]
    GUARD #1:  Halt!
Who goes there?
    ARTHUR:  It is I, Christian Day, Scientist, from theKarlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany.
King of the physicist, defeator of the Saxons, sovereign
            of all Germany!
    GUARD #1:  Pull the other one!
    ARTHUR:  I am.
And this my trusty servant Lovelock.
            We have ridden the length and breadth of the land in search of knights
            who will join me in my court of Camelot.
I must speak with your lord
            and master.
    GUARD #1:  What, ridden on a horse?
    ARTHUR:  Yes!
    GUARD #1:  You're using coconuts!
    ARTHUR:  What?
    GUARD #1:  You've got two empty halves of coconut and you're bangin'
            'em together.
    ARTHUR:  So?
We have ridden since the snows of winter covered this
            land, through the kingdom of Mercea, through--
    GUARD #1:  Where'd you get the coconut?
    ARTHUR:  We found them.
    GUARD #1:  Found them?
In Mercea?
The coconut's tropical!
    ARTHUR:  What do you mean?
    GUARD #1:  Well, this is a temperate zone.
    ARTHUR:  The swallow may fly south with the sun or the house martin
            or the plumber may seek warmer climes in winter yet these are not
            strangers to our land.
    GUARD #1:  Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?
    ARTHUR:  Not at all, they could be carried.
    GUARD #1:  What -- a swallow carrying a coconut?
    ARTHUR:  It could grip it by the husk!
    GUARD #1:  It's not a question of where he grips it!
It's a simple
            question of weight ratios!
A five ounce bird could not carry a 1 pound
            coconut.
    ARTHUR:  Well, it doesn't matter.
Will you go and tell your master
            that Christian Day of Germany is here!
    GUARD #1:  Listen, in order to maintain air-speed velocity, a swallow
            needs to beat its wings 43 times every second, right?
    ARTHUR:  Please!
    GUARD #1:  Am I right?
    ARTHUR:  I'm not interested!
    GUARD #2:  It could be carried by an African swallow!
    GUARD #1:  Oh, yeah, an African swallow maybe, but not a European
            swallow, that's my point.
    GUARD #2:  Oh, yeah, I agree with that...
    ARTHUR:  Will you ask your master if he wants to join my court
            at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany?!
    GUARD #1:  But then of course African swallows are not migratory.
    GUARD #2:  Oh, yeah...
    GUARD #1:  So they couldn't bring a coconut back anyway...
            [clop clop]
    GUARD #2:  Wait a minute -- supposing two swallows carried it together?
    GUARD #1:  No, they'd have to have it on a line.
    GUARD #2:  Well, simple!
They'd just use a standard creeper!
    GUARD #1:  What, held under the dorsal guiding feathers?
    GUARD #2:  Well, why not?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912671</id>
	<title>Re:Yea so?</title>
	<author>idontgno</author>
	<datestamp>1256839620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cuckoo for cocotokamak? Who knew!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cuckoo for cocotokamak ?
Who knew !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cuckoo for cocotokamak?
Who knew!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910695</id>
	<title>Power of the sun?  Artificial stars?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256832540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a fusion reaction.  Just say that.  No stars here, no power from the sun.  Nuclear fusion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a fusion reaction .
Just say that .
No stars here , no power from the sun .
Nuclear fusion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a fusion reaction.
Just say that.
No stars here, no power from the sun.
Nuclear fusion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910681</id>
	<title>Fusion == boom?</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1256832480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Read Robert Heinlein's "Blowups Happen".</p><p>BTW I love coconut.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Read Robert Heinlein 's " Blowups Happen " .BTW I love coconut .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read Robert Heinlein's "Blowups Happen".BTW I love coconut.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29915431</id>
	<title>Re:It's Just Activated Carbon...</title>
	<author>ozbird</author>
	<datestamp>1256807280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Why is this news?</p></div></blockquote><p>Because it appears that it was <i>Indonesian</i> swallows, not African (or European.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this news ? Because it appears that it was Indonesian swallows , not African ( or European .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this news?Because it appears that it was Indonesian swallows, not African (or European.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911163</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911001</id>
	<title>Re:Nuclear Waste?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256833620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Points of correction for you.</p><p>Fusion reactions, with almost no exceptions, will release fast moving free neutrons.  The neutrons will in turn go on to radioactivate the containment structure around the reactor.  So any fusion reactor we produce will generate waste, but it will be short lived and relatively easy to handle.</p><p>You've probably drank deuterium in your water intake every day of your life.  It's not hazardous.  Tritium is radioactive, emitting mild beta rays (weak enough to be stopped by very thin glass).</p><p>You are correct - no risk of meltdown.  Stop the input of fuel, stop the reaction.  It's damn hard to get a reaction going and keep it that way, let alone get a self-sustaining situation going.  Takes something about the same size as the sun...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Points of correction for you.Fusion reactions , with almost no exceptions , will release fast moving free neutrons .
The neutrons will in turn go on to radioactivate the containment structure around the reactor .
So any fusion reactor we produce will generate waste , but it will be short lived and relatively easy to handle.You 've probably drank deuterium in your water intake every day of your life .
It 's not hazardous .
Tritium is radioactive , emitting mild beta rays ( weak enough to be stopped by very thin glass ) .You are correct - no risk of meltdown .
Stop the input of fuel , stop the reaction .
It 's damn hard to get a reaction going and keep it that way , let alone get a self-sustaining situation going .
Takes something about the same size as the sun.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Points of correction for you.Fusion reactions, with almost no exceptions, will release fast moving free neutrons.
The neutrons will in turn go on to radioactivate the containment structure around the reactor.
So any fusion reactor we produce will generate waste, but it will be short lived and relatively easy to handle.You've probably drank deuterium in your water intake every day of your life.
It's not hazardous.
Tritium is radioactive, emitting mild beta rays (weak enough to be stopped by very thin glass).You are correct - no risk of meltdown.
Stop the input of fuel, stop the reaction.
It's damn hard to get a reaction going and keep it that way, let alone get a self-sustaining situation going.
Takes something about the same size as the sun...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29922671</id>
	<title>Re:Power of the sun? Artificial stars?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256911560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You, sir, owe me a keyboard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You , sir , owe me a keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You, sir, owe me a keyboard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912969</id>
	<title>Re:Thanks for finding me a tech website to ignore</title>
	<author>Red Flayer</author>
	<datestamp>1256840700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>adsorption (plural adsorptions) The process by which a liquid or gas adsorbate is adsorbed by an adsorbent, forming a film on the adsorbent's surface.</p></div></blockquote><p>You missed the part of the definition that would have helped you:</p><blockquote><div><p> <b>Etymology</b> <br>

<a href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/adsorb" title="wiktionary.org">adsorb</a> [wiktionary.org] + -ion</p></div></blockquote><p>

Try looking up the root (adsorb).  I've added in the link to the root for you above, just as they do on wiktionary.<br> <br>Don't hate wiktionary.  Hate not knowing how to use a dictionary instead.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>adsorption ( plural adsorptions ) The process by which a liquid or gas adsorbate is adsorbed by an adsorbent , forming a film on the adsorbent 's surface.You missed the part of the definition that would have helped you : Etymology adsorb [ wiktionary.org ] + -ion Try looking up the root ( adsorb ) .
I 've added in the link to the root for you above , just as they do on wiktionary .
Do n't hate wiktionary .
Hate not knowing how to use a dictionary instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>adsorption (plural adsorptions) The process by which a liquid or gas adsorbate is adsorbed by an adsorbent, forming a film on the adsorbent's surface.You missed the part of the definition that would have helped you: Etymology 

adsorb [wiktionary.org] + -ion

Try looking up the root (adsorb).
I've added in the link to the root for you above, just as they do on wiktionary.
Don't hate wiktionary.
Hate not knowing how to use a dictionary instead.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912615</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910829</id>
	<title>Thanks for finding me a tech website to ignore</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256833020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Any editor discussing technology who still feels the need to put the word <i>adsorb</i> into quotes, as though it's not a legitimate English term, should be fired. If you're afraid your audience won't understand, then insert a sidebar on the mechanics of adsorption; don't act as though it's a term out of sci-fi.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any editor discussing technology who still feels the need to put the word adsorb into quotes , as though it 's not a legitimate English term , should be fired .
If you 're afraid your audience wo n't understand , then insert a sidebar on the mechanics of adsorption ; do n't act as though it 's a term out of sci-fi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any editor discussing technology who still feels the need to put the word adsorb into quotes, as though it's not a legitimate English term, should be fired.
If you're afraid your audience won't understand, then insert a sidebar on the mechanics of adsorption; don't act as though it's a term out of sci-fi.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913413</id>
	<title>Re:Nuclear Waste?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256842560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>No. It produces neutrons, so the material of the reactor will gradually become radioactive. </i> </p><p>That isn't necessarily true.  The neutrons can be captured by something else (fluid barrier), or the inner jacket of the reactor can be composed of something that won't absorb neutrons (obviously they have to go somewhere, but that somewhere doesn't have to be structural) or that becomes something non-radioactive if it does absorb neutrons.  Or the reactor could be designed so that the generated radioactives are something useful.  The output of the reactor isn't necessarily radioactive free, but it can be "waste" free.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
It produces neutrons , so the material of the reactor will gradually become radioactive .
That is n't necessarily true .
The neutrons can be captured by something else ( fluid barrier ) , or the inner jacket of the reactor can be composed of something that wo n't absorb neutrons ( obviously they have to go somewhere , but that somewhere does n't have to be structural ) or that becomes something non-radioactive if it does absorb neutrons .
Or the reactor could be designed so that the generated radioactives are something useful .
The output of the reactor is n't necessarily radioactive free , but it can be " waste " free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
It produces neutrons, so the material of the reactor will gradually become radioactive.
That isn't necessarily true.
The neutrons can be captured by something else (fluid barrier), or the inner jacket of the reactor can be composed of something that won't absorb neutrons (obviously they have to go somewhere, but that somewhere doesn't have to be structural) or that becomes something non-radioactive if it does absorb neutrons.
Or the reactor could be designed so that the generated radioactives are something useful.
The output of the reactor isn't necessarily radioactive free, but it can be "waste" free.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911087</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911815</id>
	<title>Re:commercially viable ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256836560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A - ITER won't be commercially viable.  Good science, probably, but not commercially viable.</p><p>B - Even if it were commercially viable, it's still years away.  I think the first deuterium-tritium experiments are scheduled 10-15 years from now.</p><p>C - Yes it's not completely safe.  The vessel will become activated, and tritium itself is radioactive.  Never mind the health hazards of beryllium.  Regardless, the waste should be a lot easier to deal with than fission products.  I don't know the numbers for half lives, but from what I understand, it's 1-100s of years instead of 100,000s of years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A - ITER wo n't be commercially viable .
Good science , probably , but not commercially viable.B - Even if it were commercially viable , it 's still years away .
I think the first deuterium-tritium experiments are scheduled 10-15 years from now.C - Yes it 's not completely safe .
The vessel will become activated , and tritium itself is radioactive .
Never mind the health hazards of beryllium .
Regardless , the waste should be a lot easier to deal with than fission products .
I do n't know the numbers for half lives , but from what I understand , it 's 1-100s of years instead of 100,000s of years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A - ITER won't be commercially viable.
Good science, probably, but not commercially viable.B - Even if it were commercially viable, it's still years away.
I think the first deuterium-tritium experiments are scheduled 10-15 years from now.C - Yes it's not completely safe.
The vessel will become activated, and tritium itself is radioactive.
Never mind the health hazards of beryllium.
Regardless, the waste should be a lot easier to deal with than fission products.
I don't know the numbers for half lives, but from what I understand, it's 1-100s of years instead of 100,000s of years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911927</id>
	<title>20 years research to find vintage 2002?</title>
	<author>RivenAleem</author>
	<datestamp>1256837100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just how many Pina Coladas is that?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just how many Pina Coladas is that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just how many Pina Coladas is that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911717</id>
	<title>Re:Power of the sun? Artificial stars?</title>
	<author>gedrin</author>
	<datestamp>1256836200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeh, you really do need to spin it.  After all if they said "Bringing the power of a ball of nuclear fire the size of a million Earths to you!" they might never have gotten the project off the ground.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeh , you really do need to spin it .
After all if they said " Bringing the power of a ball of nuclear fire the size of a million Earths to you !
" they might never have gotten the project off the ground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeh, you really do need to spin it.
After all if they said "Bringing the power of a ball of nuclear fire the size of a million Earths to you!
" they might never have gotten the project off the ground.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911003</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912693</id>
	<title>Re:I just want to say...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256839680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sandia Z-machine peak temperature: over 2 billion Kelvin <a href="http://www.sandia.gov/news-center/news-releases/2006/physics-astron/hottest-z-output.html" title="sandia.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.sandia.gov/news-center/news-releases/2006/physics-astron/hottest-z-output.html</a> [sandia.gov]</p><p>Sun's core: 5800 Kelvin.</p><p>Hotter than the Sun has been done for years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sandia Z-machine peak temperature : over 2 billion Kelvin http : //www.sandia.gov/news-center/news-releases/2006/physics-astron/hottest-z-output.html [ sandia.gov ] Sun 's core : 5800 Kelvin.Hotter than the Sun has been done for years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sandia Z-machine peak temperature: over 2 billion Kelvin http://www.sandia.gov/news-center/news-releases/2006/physics-astron/hottest-z-output.html [sandia.gov]Sun's core: 5800 Kelvin.Hotter than the Sun has been done for years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911011</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910999</id>
	<title>Are They...</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1256833620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Big coconuts?<br>Tahiti sweetie nuts?<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chPeuuGn7o4" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chPeuuGn7o4</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Big coconuts ? Tahiti sweetie nuts ? http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = chPeuuGn7o4 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Big coconuts?Tahiti sweetie nuts?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chPeuuGn7o4 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911493</id>
	<title>Where did they get the coconuts?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256835540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Found them? In Mercia? The coconut's tropical! Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Found them ?
In Mercia ?
The coconut 's tropical !
Are you suggesting coconuts migrate ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Found them?
In Mercia?
The coconut's tropical!
Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911885</id>
	<title>What waste?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256836920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So there's hydrogen isotopes in there like tritium and there's absolutely nothing else because it's inside a vacuum with magnets around it.  They fuze those together and um...what does the charcoal have to adsorb or otherwise capture?  Doesn't it fuse into like helium or something?  First of all, that's a harmless gas, not a harmful liquid or solid and secondly, it doesn't need to be captured and stored by a carbon filter material because it's not toxic.  They sure aren't fusing hydrogen into lead of something that would actually need to be captured instead of shot out of a coolant smokestack, right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So there 's hydrogen isotopes in there like tritium and there 's absolutely nothing else because it 's inside a vacuum with magnets around it .
They fuze those together and um...what does the charcoal have to adsorb or otherwise capture ?
Does n't it fuse into like helium or something ?
First of all , that 's a harmless gas , not a harmful liquid or solid and secondly , it does n't need to be captured and stored by a carbon filter material because it 's not toxic .
They sure are n't fusing hydrogen into lead of something that would actually need to be captured instead of shot out of a coolant smokestack , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So there's hydrogen isotopes in there like tritium and there's absolutely nothing else because it's inside a vacuum with magnets around it.
They fuze those together and um...what does the charcoal have to adsorb or otherwise capture?
Doesn't it fuse into like helium or something?
First of all, that's a harmless gas, not a harmful liquid or solid and secondly, it doesn't need to be captured and stored by a carbon filter material because it's not toxic.
They sure aren't fusing hydrogen into lead of something that would actually need to be captured instead of shot out of a coolant smokestack, right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910729</id>
	<title>Old News...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256832660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RTFA... it refers back to a NewScientist story from 2 weeks ago.</p><p>Nothing fresh here, drive through!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RTFA... it refers back to a NewScientist story from 2 weeks ago.Nothing fresh here , drive through !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RTFA... it refers back to a NewScientist story from 2 weeks ago.Nothing fresh here, drive through!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911847</id>
	<title>!sciance</title>
	<author>Eightbitgnosis</author>
	<datestamp>1256836740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Coconut based fusion has no time for the sciantific method</htmltext>
<tokenext>Coconut based fusion has no time for the sciantific method</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Coconut based fusion has no time for the sciantific method</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912301</id>
	<title>Carbon shields used before, bad idea</title>
	<author>caffiend666</author>
	<datestamp>1256838240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Carbon shields have been used before, was bad idea with bad consequences.  The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windscale\_fire" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Windscale</a> [wikipedia.org] research reactors were built with a significant amount of graphite for absorbing neutron radiation.  The graphite was great at it.  But, the energy would build up and spontaneously release itself as energy, and/or fires.  Sure, they had work arounds.  But, the workarounds gradually stopped being useful and the entire thing went up in flames eventually.  Cleanup has just now really started, after over 50 years.  Granted, there might be a safe way to use carbon once and change it out.  But geez, carbon dioxied waste is one thing.  Nuclear/spontaneously combusting carbon waste is another....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Carbon shields have been used before , was bad idea with bad consequences .
The Windscale [ wikipedia.org ] research reactors were built with a significant amount of graphite for absorbing neutron radiation .
The graphite was great at it .
But , the energy would build up and spontaneously release itself as energy , and/or fires .
Sure , they had work arounds .
But , the workarounds gradually stopped being useful and the entire thing went up in flames eventually .
Cleanup has just now really started , after over 50 years .
Granted , there might be a safe way to use carbon once and change it out .
But geez , carbon dioxied waste is one thing .
Nuclear/spontaneously combusting carbon waste is another... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Carbon shields have been used before, was bad idea with bad consequences.
The Windscale [wikipedia.org] research reactors were built with a significant amount of graphite for absorbing neutron radiation.
The graphite was great at it.
But, the energy would build up and spontaneously release itself as energy, and/or fires.
Sure, they had work arounds.
But, the workarounds gradually stopped being useful and the entire thing went up in flames eventually.
Cleanup has just now really started, after over 50 years.
Granted, there might be a safe way to use carbon once and change it out.
But geez, carbon dioxied waste is one thing.
Nuclear/spontaneously combusting carbon waste is another....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911875</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, I saw this episode</title>
	<author>Abreu</author>
	<datestamp>1256836860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I never understood why they never decided to <a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/JustEatGilligan" title="tvtropes.org">just eat Gilligan</a> [tvtropes.org] and enjoy their island...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I never understood why they never decided to just eat Gilligan [ tvtropes.org ] and enjoy their island.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never understood why they never decided to just eat Gilligan [tvtropes.org] and enjoy their island...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910659</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779</id>
	<title>Nuclear Waste?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256832840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My understanding is that this doesn't produce any nuclear waste at all, is that right?</p><p>It says the fuel is deutrium and tritium, how hazardous are those?</p><p>And it seems like there is basically zero risk of a "meltdown" as the reaction would presumably stop as soon as the power is cut off.</p><p>So worst-case scenario appears to be that they damage the reactor and everything shuts down.</p><p>Right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My understanding is that this does n't produce any nuclear waste at all , is that right ? It says the fuel is deutrium and tritium , how hazardous are those ? And it seems like there is basically zero risk of a " meltdown " as the reaction would presumably stop as soon as the power is cut off.So worst-case scenario appears to be that they damage the reactor and everything shuts down.Right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My understanding is that this doesn't produce any nuclear waste at all, is that right?It says the fuel is deutrium and tritium, how hazardous are those?And it seems like there is basically zero risk of a "meltdown" as the reaction would presumably stop as soon as the power is cut off.So worst-case scenario appears to be that they damage the reactor and everything shuts down.Right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912393</id>
	<title>Re:Thanks for finding me a tech website to ignore</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256838540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this your first time to Slashdot?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this your first time to Slashdot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this your first time to Slashdot?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910829</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911531</id>
	<title>Re:I just want to say...</title>
	<author>Scrameustache</author>
	<datestamp>1256835660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's so freaking cool that there's going to be something man-made that will reach temperatures similar to the core of the sun. It's just... too cool.</p></div><p>Oh, the irony.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's so freaking cool that there 's going to be something man-made that will reach temperatures similar to the core of the sun .
It 's just... too cool.Oh , the irony .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's so freaking cool that there's going to be something man-made that will reach temperatures similar to the core of the sun.
It's just... too cool.Oh, the irony.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911011</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917015</id>
	<title>I suppose ...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1256812920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... the next thing they'll be telling us is that these coconuts were carried here by swallows.
</p><p>An African swallow maybe<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... but not a European swallow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... the next thing they 'll be telling us is that these coconuts were carried here by swallows .
An African swallow maybe ... but not a European swallow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... the next thing they'll be telling us is that these coconuts were carried here by swallows.
An African swallow maybe ... but not a European swallow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910731</id>
	<title>Research was conducted by the Professor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256832720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On Gilligan's Island.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On Gilligan 's Island .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On Gilligan's Island.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910925</id>
	<title>Re:Nuclear Waste?</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1256833380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Over time, the containment vessel will eventually become radioactive. The ratio of energy to waste should be pretty excellent though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Over time , the containment vessel will eventually become radioactive .
The ratio of energy to waste should be pretty excellent though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Over time, the containment vessel will eventually become radioactive.
The ratio of energy to waste should be pretty excellent though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911685</id>
	<title>Re:Thanks for finding me a tech website to ignore</title>
	<author>Chris Mattern</author>
	<datestamp>1256836140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because adsorption and absorption aren't the same thing.  They said what they meant; suggesting that they use the wrong word is not good advice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because adsorption and absorption are n't the same thing .
They said what they meant ; suggesting that they use the wrong word is not good advice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because adsorption and absorption aren't the same thing.
They said what they meant; suggesting that they use the wrong word is not good advice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911349</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910653</id>
	<title>Even more interesting...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256832420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...is the bamboo bicycle used to remove the atmosphere of the vacuum chamber.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...is the bamboo bicycle used to remove the atmosphere of the vacuum chamber .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...is the bamboo bicycle used to remove the atmosphere of the vacuum chamber.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912821</id>
	<title>That Gilligan's Isle Thing..</title>
	<author>Njoyda Sauce</author>
	<datestamp>1256840160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great, now I have "Isle Thing" stuck in my head. I know it's not nuclear, but still...coconuts.</p><p>I like the professor<br>He always saves their butts<br>He could build a nuclear reactor<br>From a couple of coconuts</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , now I have " Isle Thing " stuck in my head .
I know it 's not nuclear , but still...coconuts.I like the professorHe always saves their buttsHe could build a nuclear reactorFrom a couple of coconuts</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, now I have "Isle Thing" stuck in my head.
I know it's not nuclear, but still...coconuts.I like the professorHe always saves their buttsHe could build a nuclear reactorFrom a couple of coconuts</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913247</id>
	<title>Oblig.</title>
	<author>ThatsNotPudding</author>
	<datestamp>1256841900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1. Coconuts<br>
2. ???<br>
3. Nuclear Fusion!</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Coconuts 2 .
? ? ? 3 .
Nuclear Fusion !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Coconuts
2.
???
3.
Nuclear Fusion!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913429</id>
	<title>Re:Power of the sun? Artificial stars?</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1256842680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think, the power of <i>a</i> sun would be a better thing to say. And also more badass, creating an artificial controlled sun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think , the power of a sun would be a better thing to say .
And also more badass , creating an artificial controlled sun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think, the power of a sun would be a better thing to say.
And also more badass, creating an artificial controlled sun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910695</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911465</id>
	<title>Re:Thanks for finding me a tech website to ignore</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256835420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the author intended people to pay close attention and not subconsciously read "absorb". Because I did... I only noticed the difference after you mentioned something, even though I already knew what adsorption is</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the author intended people to pay close attention and not subconsciously read " absorb " .
Because I did... I only noticed the difference after you mentioned something , even though I already knew what adsorption is</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the author intended people to pay close attention and not subconsciously read "absorb".
Because I did... I only noticed the difference after you mentioned something, even though I already knew what adsorption is</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910829</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912015</id>
	<title>Re:Fusion == boom?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256837400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better - "Nerves" - Lester Del Rey (1942 short story expanded to 1956 novel)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better - " Nerves " - Lester Del Rey ( 1942 short story expanded to 1956 novel )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better - "Nerves" - Lester Del Rey (1942 short story expanded to 1956 novel)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910681</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911533</id>
	<title>Across the ditch</title>
	<author>rossdee</author>
	<datestamp>1256835660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know the guy that actually split the atom (Ernest Rutherford) was from New Zealand, not australia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know the guy that actually split the atom ( Ernest Rutherford ) was from New Zealand , not australia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know the guy that actually split the atom (Ernest Rutherford) was from New Zealand, not australia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912517</id>
	<title>Re:In related news...</title>
	<author>Sgt. B</author>
	<datestamp>1256839020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur</p></div><p>Not quite everything.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Quidquid latine dictum sit , altum sonaturNot quite everything .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonaturNot quite everything.
:)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29915485</id>
	<title>Re:Fusion == boom?</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1256807460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Blowups Happen" was about a fission reactor, not a fusion one.  Heinlein, not having in 1939 the advantage of decades of human experience with nuclear fission, posited a reactor which required a huge amount of uranium and had to be run just below supercritical in order to produce a useful amount of power.  Mess up the settings just a little bit, and you get a world-buster nuclear explosion sufficient to destroy life on earth.</p><p>To make things worse, the stress of running the thing tended to drive the operators and management crazy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Blowups Happen " was about a fission reactor , not a fusion one .
Heinlein , not having in 1939 the advantage of decades of human experience with nuclear fission , posited a reactor which required a huge amount of uranium and had to be run just below supercritical in order to produce a useful amount of power .
Mess up the settings just a little bit , and you get a world-buster nuclear explosion sufficient to destroy life on earth.To make things worse , the stress of running the thing tended to drive the operators and management crazy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Blowups Happen" was about a fission reactor, not a fusion one.
Heinlein, not having in 1939 the advantage of decades of human experience with nuclear fission, posited a reactor which required a huge amount of uranium and had to be run just below supercritical in order to produce a useful amount of power.
Mess up the settings just a little bit, and you get a world-buster nuclear explosion sufficient to destroy life on earth.To make things worse, the stress of running the thing tended to drive the operators and management crazy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910681</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911441</id>
	<title>Report Guy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256835360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Star Trek Engineer: Ok! we're ready to fly...<br>*New fancy Fusion drive- Check!<br>*Purty lights are on- Check!<br>*2000 pounds of Coconut charcoal.... uhhhhhh..Captain?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Star Trek Engineer : Ok !
we 're ready to fly... * New fancy Fusion drive- Check !
* Purty lights are on- Check !
* 2000 pounds of Coconut charcoal... .
uhhhhhh..Captain ? !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Star Trek Engineer: Ok!
we're ready to fly...*New fancy Fusion drive- Check!
*Purty lights are on- Check!
*2000 pounds of Coconut charcoal....
uhhhhhh..Captain?!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911255</id>
	<title>Re:Yea so?</title>
	<author>Sporkinum</author>
	<datestamp>1256834700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a cocotokamak!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a cocotokamak !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a cocotokamak!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910749</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913687</id>
	<title>Re:Fusion == boom?</title>
	<author>Gilmoure</author>
	<datestamp>1256843640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or H. Beam Piper's <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/18949" title="gutenberg.org">Day of the Moran</a> [gutenberg.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or H. Beam Piper 's Day of the Moran [ gutenberg.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or H. Beam Piper's Day of the Moran [gutenberg.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910681</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910629</id>
	<title>That's not a horse!</title>
	<author>Tybalt\_Capulet</author>
	<datestamp>1256832300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not a horse, you're just bangin' two coconuts together!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not a horse , you 're just bangin ' two coconuts together !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not a horse, you're just bangin' two coconuts together!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911595</id>
	<title>Re:Nuclear Waste?</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1256835840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Deuterium isn't much of a hazard at all. In the form of heavy water it starts to be a problem only if 25\% of your total water is replaced by it and isn't lethal until around 50\%. Essentially you'd have to drink only heavy water for about a week. The toxicity is due to deuterium inhibiting cell division.  In it's gaseous form, it will simply dissipate harmlessly.</p><p>It might or might not make a good diluent for breathing gas for deep diving except that it's way too expensive for that so has never been tried.</p><p>Even with all of that, fusion reactors will have a net negative impact on deuterium since it is concentrated from large amounts of natural water but will be fused into helium.</p><p>Tritium is a beta emitter, so is a bit more hazardous, but will also dissipate quickly. Modern radio-luminescent markers use a small vial of tritium instead of the old radium and are quite safe.</p><p>The reactor hardware itself would become radioactive in use due to neutrons, but it's activity would be fairly short lived once the reactor shuts down.</p><p>No meltdown risks at all, no dangerous radiation leaks. Whatever happens, the worst possible case is that a very expensive reactor is ruined.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Deuterium is n't much of a hazard at all .
In the form of heavy water it starts to be a problem only if 25 \ % of your total water is replaced by it and is n't lethal until around 50 \ % .
Essentially you 'd have to drink only heavy water for about a week .
The toxicity is due to deuterium inhibiting cell division .
In it 's gaseous form , it will simply dissipate harmlessly.It might or might not make a good diluent for breathing gas for deep diving except that it 's way too expensive for that so has never been tried.Even with all of that , fusion reactors will have a net negative impact on deuterium since it is concentrated from large amounts of natural water but will be fused into helium.Tritium is a beta emitter , so is a bit more hazardous , but will also dissipate quickly .
Modern radio-luminescent markers use a small vial of tritium instead of the old radium and are quite safe.The reactor hardware itself would become radioactive in use due to neutrons , but it 's activity would be fairly short lived once the reactor shuts down.No meltdown risks at all , no dangerous radiation leaks .
Whatever happens , the worst possible case is that a very expensive reactor is ruined .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Deuterium isn't much of a hazard at all.
In the form of heavy water it starts to be a problem only if 25\% of your total water is replaced by it and isn't lethal until around 50\%.
Essentially you'd have to drink only heavy water for about a week.
The toxicity is due to deuterium inhibiting cell division.
In it's gaseous form, it will simply dissipate harmlessly.It might or might not make a good diluent for breathing gas for deep diving except that it's way too expensive for that so has never been tried.Even with all of that, fusion reactors will have a net negative impact on deuterium since it is concentrated from large amounts of natural water but will be fused into helium.Tritium is a beta emitter, so is a bit more hazardous, but will also dissipate quickly.
Modern radio-luminescent markers use a small vial of tritium instead of the old radium and are quite safe.The reactor hardware itself would become radioactive in use due to neutrons, but it's activity would be fairly short lived once the reactor shuts down.No meltdown risks at all, no dangerous radiation leaks.
Whatever happens, the worst possible case is that a very expensive reactor is ruined.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29920073</id>
	<title>Submitter's bias?</title>
	<author>Dean Edmonds</author>
	<datestamp>1256831580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article says that ITER "may" become the first commercially viable fusion reactor, but in his<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. submission the submitter has changed that to "will". Given the number of contenders who will show first plasma before ITER even powers up, even if ITER does work as expected, it may not be the first.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article says that ITER " may " become the first commercially viable fusion reactor , but in his / .
submission the submitter has changed that to " will " .
Given the number of contenders who will show first plasma before ITER even powers up , even if ITER does work as expected , it may not be the first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article says that ITER "may" become the first commercially viable fusion reactor, but in his /.
submission the submitter has changed that to "will".
Given the number of contenders who will show first plasma before ITER even powers up, even if ITER does work as expected, it may not be the first.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913819</id>
	<title>They are putting it in a DeLorean</title>
	<author>bodland</author>
	<datestamp>1256844120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh and it can use common household garbage too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh and it can use common household garbage too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh and it can use common household garbage too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911627</id>
	<title>Re:commercially viable ?</title>
	<author>kevinNCSU</author>
	<datestamp>1256835960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Safety is relative.  In the case of power generation, safety is relative to worst case possibilities of a Nuclear Plant. Care to enlighten us as to how nuetron flux and radioactive embrittlement of the containment shell can result in the deaths and long-term health side-effects of the surrounding community for miles around and render the area uninhabitable for years as is the case with a worst case fuck-all-safety-mechanisms nuclear power plant disaster?  Because I'm not sure you could pull that off here even if a Terrorist had the full support of the entire facility staff and two weeks to try to accomplish it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Safety is relative .
In the case of power generation , safety is relative to worst case possibilities of a Nuclear Plant .
Care to enlighten us as to how nuetron flux and radioactive embrittlement of the containment shell can result in the deaths and long-term health side-effects of the surrounding community for miles around and render the area uninhabitable for years as is the case with a worst case fuck-all-safety-mechanisms nuclear power plant disaster ?
Because I 'm not sure you could pull that off here even if a Terrorist had the full support of the entire facility staff and two weeks to try to accomplish it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Safety is relative.
In the case of power generation, safety is relative to worst case possibilities of a Nuclear Plant.
Care to enlighten us as to how nuetron flux and radioactive embrittlement of the containment shell can result in the deaths and long-term health side-effects of the surrounding community for miles around and render the area uninhabitable for years as is the case with a worst case fuck-all-safety-mechanisms nuclear power plant disaster?
Because I'm not sure you could pull that off here even if a Terrorist had the full support of the entire facility staff and two weeks to try to accomplish it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911349</id>
	<title>Re:Thanks for finding me a tech website to ignore</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256835000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed. I just have to wonder why they didn't bother to correct the spelling as proper: ABSORB.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
I just have to wonder why they did n't bother to correct the spelling as proper : ABSORB .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
I just have to wonder why they didn't bother to correct the spelling as proper: ABSORB.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910829</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912113</id>
	<title>I'd like to see fusion power but..</title>
	<author>CFBMoo1</author>
	<datestamp>1256837700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The video on that site gives me a horrible feeling. The same feeling I had when I was sent to look for a scientist down in the bowels of a base just as all Hell broke loose. I'm stocking up on D cells and gas for the chain saw.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The video on that site gives me a horrible feeling .
The same feeling I had when I was sent to look for a scientist down in the bowels of a base just as all Hell broke loose .
I 'm stocking up on D cells and gas for the chain saw .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The video on that site gives me a horrible feeling.
The same feeling I had when I was sent to look for a scientist down in the bowels of a base just as all Hell broke loose.
I'm stocking up on D cells and gas for the chain saw.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911407</id>
	<title>of course it's not warp drive....</title>
	<author>inerlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1256835240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>everyone knows warp drives are powered by matter/antimatter reactions.... not fusion...<br>duh....<br><br>the impulse engines are powered by fusion reactors, and those are limited to a speed of 1/4 c</htmltext>
<tokenext>everyone knows warp drives are powered by matter/antimatter reactions.... not fusion...duh....the impulse engines are powered by fusion reactors , and those are limited to a speed of 1/4 c</tokentext>
<sentencetext>everyone knows warp drives are powered by matter/antimatter reactions.... not fusion...duh....the impulse engines are powered by fusion reactors, and those are limited to a speed of 1/4 c</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29920157</id>
	<title>Re:I just want to say...</title>
	<author>BlueParrot</author>
	<datestamp>1256832240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A fusion reactor is quite a bit hotter than the core of the sun since we can't achieve anywhere close to the same density in the plasma. I ran into a guy working at the Join European Torus and he used to joke that he was working on the hottest thing in the solar system. Of course he had to stop doing that when he ran into a guy from CERN.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A fusion reactor is quite a bit hotter than the core of the sun since we ca n't achieve anywhere close to the same density in the plasma .
I ran into a guy working at the Join European Torus and he used to joke that he was working on the hottest thing in the solar system .
Of course he had to stop doing that when he ran into a guy from CERN .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A fusion reactor is quite a bit hotter than the core of the sun since we can't achieve anywhere close to the same density in the plasma.
I ran into a guy working at the Join European Torus and he used to joke that he was working on the hottest thing in the solar system.
Of course he had to stop doing that when he ran into a guy from CERN.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911011</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913161</id>
	<title>Re:commercially viable ?</title>
	<author>Daniel\_Staal</author>
	<datestamp>1256841420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suspect it produces less waste per kilowatt-hour than nearly anything else in use.  (Solar and wind might come up with less.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect it produces less waste per kilowatt-hour than nearly anything else in use .
( Solar and wind might come up with less .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect it produces less waste per kilowatt-hour than nearly anything else in use.
(Solar and wind might come up with less.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910947</id>
	<title>Re:Nuclear Waste?</title>
	<author>Zenaku</author>
	<datestamp>1256833500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It says the fuel is deuterium and tritium, how hazardous are those?</i></p><p>Oh, EXTREMELY hazardous.  Both substances have similar properties to a highly volatile chemical that has in past resulted in some spectacular explosions.  OH THE HUMANITY!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It says the fuel is deuterium and tritium , how hazardous are those ? Oh , EXTREMELY hazardous .
Both substances have similar properties to a highly volatile chemical that has in past resulted in some spectacular explosions .
OH THE HUMANITY !
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It says the fuel is deuterium and tritium, how hazardous are those?Oh, EXTREMELY hazardous.
Both substances have similar properties to a highly volatile chemical that has in past resulted in some spectacular explosions.
OH THE HUMANITY!
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910681
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913687
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910829
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912393
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29915551
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910681
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29915485
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910695
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913429
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911039
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29915707
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910829
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910829
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911319
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910749
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917821
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911457
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911533
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910619
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910843
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29920157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911815
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910695
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911003
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911717
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910695
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29915715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910749
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911851
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29915431
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910695
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911003
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29919159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910905
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910749
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911225
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911437
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911087
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913413
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910829
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911465
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910829
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911685
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912615
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912969
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911039
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29918635
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913115
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910749
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911151
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917555
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910695
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917845
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910629
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911091
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910695
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29922671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912693
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910829
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912291
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917971
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29914109
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910681
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911065
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911749
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910925
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911595
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911673
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910695
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917927
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_148259_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912301
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913115
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910779
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29915551
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910945
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911087
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913413
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911151
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910947
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911673
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911595
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910995
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910925
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911039
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29918635
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29915707
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911065
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910687
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911239
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910829
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912393
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911349
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911685
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912615
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912969
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911381
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911319
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912291
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911465
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910831
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911533
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911139
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29916543
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910619
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910843
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910729
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910795
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910909
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911615
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910695
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917845
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911003
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911717
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29919159
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917927
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911031
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29915715
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29922671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913429
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29915431
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911927
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910967
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917919
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910653
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910659
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910929
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910905
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917971
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911011
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911531
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29920157
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911749
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912693
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29914109
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910633
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912517
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911885
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910681
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29915485
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913687
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912015
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910629
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911091
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911107
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911815
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917555
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29913161
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911627
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911457
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910749
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29917821
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911225
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911851
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911255
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29912671
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_148259.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29910957
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_148259.29911437
</commentlist>
</conversation>
