<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_26_1845253</id>
	<title>Companies To Invade Your Retinas As Soon As Next Year?</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1256548020000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Engadget is one of many reporting that Brother and NEC both seem to have <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/26/brother-nec-look-to-invade-your-retinas-next-year/">retina display technology</a> in the works for release next year.  Brother, at least, seems to have a fully functional prototype, while so far NEC is mostly talk.  <i>"Naturally, there are a few considerable limitations compared to more traditional displays, but the company's as yet unnamed goggles do promise to beam an 800 x 600 image directly into your retina that'll appear as a 10-centimeter wide image floating about one meter in front of them -- which is certainly no small feat, even if it may not be the most practical one. Slightly less specific, but also working on a retina display of its own is NEC, which apparently hopes to incorporate a microphone into their display and use it as a real-time translation device that would quite literally display subtitles as you talk to someone."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Engadget is one of many reporting that Brother and NEC both seem to have retina display technology in the works for release next year .
Brother , at least , seems to have a fully functional prototype , while so far NEC is mostly talk .
" Naturally , there are a few considerable limitations compared to more traditional displays , but the company 's as yet unnamed goggles do promise to beam an 800 x 600 image directly into your retina that 'll appear as a 10-centimeter wide image floating about one meter in front of them -- which is certainly no small feat , even if it may not be the most practical one .
Slightly less specific , but also working on a retina display of its own is NEC , which apparently hopes to incorporate a microphone into their display and use it as a real-time translation device that would quite literally display subtitles as you talk to someone .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Engadget is one of many reporting that Brother and NEC both seem to have retina display technology in the works for release next year.
Brother, at least, seems to have a fully functional prototype, while so far NEC is mostly talk.
"Naturally, there are a few considerable limitations compared to more traditional displays, but the company's as yet unnamed goggles do promise to beam an 800 x 600 image directly into your retina that'll appear as a 10-centimeter wide image floating about one meter in front of them -- which is certainly no small feat, even if it may not be the most practical one.
Slightly less specific, but also working on a retina display of its own is NEC, which apparently hopes to incorporate a microphone into their display and use it as a real-time translation device that would quite literally display subtitles as you talk to someone.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877947</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory joke</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256553780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Goatse images laser-engraved into your retina and this time the goggles really do something ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Goatse images laser-engraved into your retina and this time the goggles really do something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Goatse images laser-engraved into your retina and this time the goggles really do something ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29880335</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory joke</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256572560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having had LASIK surgery, I can attest the opposite.<br>Now, put the two situations together, see a difference?  the intensity.<br>Of course a light show is going to have a large amount of energy behind it.<br>It's not designed to ever come in contact with the eye directly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having had LASIK surgery , I can attest the opposite.Now , put the two situations together , see a difference ?
the intensity.Of course a light show is going to have a large amount of energy behind it.It 's not designed to ever come in contact with the eye directly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having had LASIK surgery, I can attest the opposite.Now, put the two situations together, see a difference?
the intensity.Of course a light show is going to have a large amount of energy behind it.It's not designed to ever come in contact with the eye directly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879145</id>
	<title>Re:Prototype in article doesn't seem very practica</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1256561100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I mean the thing is right in front of one of your eyes. This means the other eye is free to look at the environment. This leaves the brain the arduous task to merge the two images into something useful.</p></div><p>Arduous? Our brain is quite nicely tuned to handle specifically such a task!</p><p>Here's a little experiment for you. Place your finger closely in front of one of your eyes. Does it preclude you from seeing normally? It shouldn't - you'll just see a translucent finger overlayed over unoccluded image from another eye.</p><p>The same thing will happen with the screen. In effect, you get translucency for free - hardware-accelerated, so to speak...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean the thing is right in front of one of your eyes .
This means the other eye is free to look at the environment .
This leaves the brain the arduous task to merge the two images into something useful.Arduous ?
Our brain is quite nicely tuned to handle specifically such a task ! Here 's a little experiment for you .
Place your finger closely in front of one of your eyes .
Does it preclude you from seeing normally ?
It should n't - you 'll just see a translucent finger overlayed over unoccluded image from another eye.The same thing will happen with the screen .
In effect , you get translucency for free - hardware-accelerated , so to speak.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean the thing is right in front of one of your eyes.
This means the other eye is free to look at the environment.
This leaves the brain the arduous task to merge the two images into something useful.Arduous?
Our brain is quite nicely tuned to handle specifically such a task!Here's a little experiment for you.
Place your finger closely in front of one of your eyes.
Does it preclude you from seeing normally?
It shouldn't - you'll just see a translucent finger overlayed over unoccluded image from another eye.The same thing will happen with the screen.
In effect, you get translucency for free - hardware-accelerated, so to speak...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877697</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877557</id>
	<title>I'm no biologist...</title>
	<author>FlyingSquidStudios</author>
	<datestamp>1256552160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But aren't all images we see the result of light beaming into our retinas?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But are n't all images we see the result of light beaming into our retinas ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But aren't all images we see the result of light beaming into our retinas?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29880843</id>
	<title>Translator for women</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256578980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now if we could just get one of these subtitle dowhackies with translations for what a woman really means when she says (or doesn't say) something to you. We will all live in peace and harmony.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now if we could just get one of these subtitle dowhackies with translations for what a woman really means when she says ( or does n't say ) something to you .
We will all live in peace and harmony .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now if we could just get one of these subtitle dowhackies with translations for what a woman really means when she says (or doesn't say) something to you.
We will all live in peace and harmony.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29880357</id>
	<title>plugging into my retina</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256572800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>oh - I see - thats not so bad - they wont ask before plugging into my RETINA...phew, I thought the technology was going to make it impossible to sit down when using it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>oh - I see - thats not so bad - they wont ask before plugging into my RETINA...phew , I thought the technology was going to make it impossible to sit down when using it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oh - I see - thats not so bad - they wont ask before plugging into my RETINA...phew, I thought the technology was going to make it impossible to sit down when using it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877697</id>
	<title>Prototype in article doesn't seem very practical</title>
	<author>rhdv</author>
	<datestamp>1256552760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mean the thing is right in front of one of your eyes. This means the other eye is free to look at the environment. This leaves the brain the arduous task to merge the two images into something useful.
<p>
Also the retina isn't that big. You are practically forced to look just right into the display to see something at all.
</p><p>
I'm working at a device to make pictures of the retina and it's pretty hard to make good images of the retina. These guys projects something on it that must be sharp enough to be useful. Kudos if they pull it off, but I'm skeptical. Show me the goods. This is just marketing blabla.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean the thing is right in front of one of your eyes .
This means the other eye is free to look at the environment .
This leaves the brain the arduous task to merge the two images into something useful .
Also the retina is n't that big .
You are practically forced to look just right into the display to see something at all .
I 'm working at a device to make pictures of the retina and it 's pretty hard to make good images of the retina .
These guys projects something on it that must be sharp enough to be useful .
Kudos if they pull it off , but I 'm skeptical .
Show me the goods .
This is just marketing blabla .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean the thing is right in front of one of your eyes.
This means the other eye is free to look at the environment.
This leaves the brain the arduous task to merge the two images into something useful.
Also the retina isn't that big.
You are practically forced to look just right into the display to see something at all.
I'm working at a device to make pictures of the retina and it's pretty hard to make good images of the retina.
These guys projects something on it that must be sharp enough to be useful.
Kudos if they pull it off, but I'm skeptical.
Show me the goods.
This is just marketing blabla.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29880123</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory joke</title>
	<author>Tekfactory</author>
	<datestamp>1256569800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well if the makers of this device were into biometrics they would know that most people find sticking lights into their retinas very invasive.</p><p>Its better than passwords, or fingerprints, but retinal scanning hasn't caught on because people don't like it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well if the makers of this device were into biometrics they would know that most people find sticking lights into their retinas very invasive.Its better than passwords , or fingerprints , but retinal scanning has n't caught on because people do n't like it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well if the makers of this device were into biometrics they would know that most people find sticking lights into their retinas very invasive.Its better than passwords, or fingerprints, but retinal scanning hasn't caught on because people don't like it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878291</id>
	<title>Re:A Little Bit Backwards?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256555340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most likely outcome: It would make more sense for a company to display subtitled advertisements that it believes are relevant to your conversation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most likely outcome : It would make more sense for a company to display subtitled advertisements that it believes are relevant to your conversation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most likely outcome: It would make more sense for a company to display subtitled advertisements that it believes are relevant to your conversation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877455</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878499</id>
	<title>Re:Imagine this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256556720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>cf. Rainbows End by Vernor Vinge
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbows\_End" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbows\_End</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>cf .
Rainbows End by Vernor Vinge http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbows \ _End [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>cf.
Rainbows End by Vernor Vinge
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbows\_End [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877759</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877471</id>
	<title>Invasion is such a strong word...</title>
	<author>RobertB-DC</author>
	<datestamp>1256551860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think "Liberation" would be a better word.  The companies will enter the eyeball (in small numbers), and will be cheered by all the cells... at first.  But then they'll get caught up in the bitter rivalries, with renegade Rods lobbing bombs at the Cones, who will in turn blame the support cells in the Sclera for fomenting dissent.</p><p>This can only end badly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think " Liberation " would be a better word .
The companies will enter the eyeball ( in small numbers ) , and will be cheered by all the cells... at first .
But then they 'll get caught up in the bitter rivalries , with renegade Rods lobbing bombs at the Cones , who will in turn blame the support cells in the Sclera for fomenting dissent.This can only end badly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think "Liberation" would be a better word.
The companies will enter the eyeball (in small numbers), and will be cheered by all the cells... at first.
But then they'll get caught up in the bitter rivalries, with renegade Rods lobbing bombs at the Cones, who will in turn blame the support cells in the Sclera for fomenting dissent.This can only end badly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29887521</id>
	<title>Bicycling Just Got Harder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256674320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>YouTube will see get many more video submissions as bicyclers get hit by this.  But I am assuming the recorder can even see the accident happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>YouTube will see get many more video submissions as bicyclers get hit by this .
But I am assuming the recorder can even see the accident happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>YouTube will see get many more video submissions as bicyclers get hit by this.
But I am assuming the recorder can even see the accident happen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877517</id>
	<title>Finally I could run for political office</title>
	<author>speedlaw</author>
	<datestamp>1256552040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I always remember faces, but names are tough.  Here I could finally know everyone's name (combined with some facial recognition software).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always remember faces , but names are tough .
Here I could finally know everyone 's name ( combined with some facial recognition software ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always remember faces, but names are tough.
Here I could finally know everyone's name (combined with some facial recognition software).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877799</id>
	<title>Or you could buy something now</title>
	<author>QuantumG</author>
	<datestamp>1256553180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.vuzix.com/iwear/products\_wrap310.html" title="vuzix.com">http://www.vuzix.com/iwear/products\_wrap310.html</a> [vuzix.com]</p><p>Available right now for under $250.  Also one of the only head mounted augmented reality systems that is commercially available today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.vuzix.com/iwear/products \ _wrap310.html [ vuzix.com ] Available right now for under $ 250 .
Also one of the only head mounted augmented reality systems that is commercially available today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.vuzix.com/iwear/products\_wrap310.html [vuzix.com]Available right now for under $250.
Also one of the only head mounted augmented reality systems that is commercially available today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877761</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory joke</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256553000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No.</p><p>How do you think you see?</p><p>That's right, light on the retina.</p><p>What's this?</p><p>That's right, light on the retina - no different.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No.How do you think you see ? That 's right , light on the retina.What 's this ? That 's right , light on the retina - no different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.How do you think you see?That's right, light on the retina.What's this?That's right, light on the retina - no different.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878697</id>
	<title>Re:I'm surprised no one has said this yet but....</title>
	<author>Eightbitgnosis</author>
	<datestamp>1256558100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's get on this so we get our 2 free tech advances!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's get on this so we get our 2 free tech advances !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's get on this so we get our 2 free tech advances!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877769</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879377</id>
	<title>Re:Imagine this</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1256562720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Depends on what you pay me, to display ads on by blank spaces!</p><p>And oh, don't try it on public surfaces. The city's ad space rental prices will kill you! ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends on what you pay me , to display ads on by blank spaces ! And oh , do n't try it on public surfaces .
The city 's ad space rental prices will kill you !
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends on what you pay me, to display ads on by blank spaces!And oh, don't try it on public surfaces.
The city's ad space rental prices will kill you!
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877759</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29920153</id>
	<title>OMG</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256832180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Slightly less specific, but also working on a retina display of its own is NEC,<br>&gt; which apparently hopes to incorporate a microphone into their display and use it as a real-time translation device that would quite literally display subtitles as you talk to<br>&gt; someone."</p><p>I think I just came.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Slightly less specific , but also working on a retina display of its own is NEC , &gt; which apparently hopes to incorporate a microphone into their display and use it as a real-time translation device that would quite literally display subtitles as you talk to &gt; someone .
" I think I just came .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Slightly less specific, but also working on a retina display of its own is NEC,&gt; which apparently hopes to incorporate a microphone into their display and use it as a real-time translation device that would quite literally display subtitles as you talk to&gt; someone.
"I think I just came.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877769</id>
	<title>I'm surprised no one has said this yet but....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256553060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>WOOHOOO Universal Translator, one step closer!</htmltext>
<tokenext>WOOHOOO Universal Translator , one step closer !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WOOHOOO Universal Translator, one step closer!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878403</id>
	<title>retinas!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256556000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My retinas! The goggles, they do... something?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My retinas !
The goggles , they do... something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My retinas!
The goggles, they do... something?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877609</id>
	<title>Send This Retina Display Error</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256552460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">Microsoft</a> [microsoft.com]</p><p>or</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17pUBYESQBk" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Cancel</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>I can't see the screen cuz the lasers BURNED my retinas.</p><p>Yours In Novosibirsk,<br>Kilgore Tour</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To Microsoft [ microsoft.com ] orCancel [ youtube.com ] I ca n't see the screen cuz the lasers BURNED my retinas.Yours In Novosibirsk,Kilgore Tour</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To Microsoft [microsoft.com]orCancel [youtube.com]I can't see the screen cuz the lasers BURNED my retinas.Yours In Novosibirsk,Kilgore Tour</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877695</id>
	<title>Too little too late</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256552760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It might have been interesting ten years ago but computer monitor resolutions have improved so much you're talking about an extremely low res picture on an expensive monitor. The only purpose I could see are handheld devices and most aren't designed for external monitors. Add it to an iPhone or a similar device and it might be a way to watch a movie on an airplane otherwise I just don't see the point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It might have been interesting ten years ago but computer monitor resolutions have improved so much you 're talking about an extremely low res picture on an expensive monitor .
The only purpose I could see are handheld devices and most are n't designed for external monitors .
Add it to an iPhone or a similar device and it might be a way to watch a movie on an airplane otherwise I just do n't see the point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It might have been interesting ten years ago but computer monitor resolutions have improved so much you're talking about an extremely low res picture on an expensive monitor.
The only purpose I could see are handheld devices and most aren't designed for external monitors.
Add it to an iPhone or a similar device and it might be a way to watch a movie on an airplane otherwise I just don't see the point.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29893165</id>
	<title>This could give monitor damage a new meaning!</title>
	<author>DrShoe</author>
	<datestamp>1256663520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they're going to start beaming an image directly in the eye, I want to make sure that the xorg.conf file is correct.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they 're going to start beaming an image directly in the eye , I want to make sure that the xorg.conf file is correct .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they're going to start beaming an image directly in the eye, I want to make sure that the xorg.conf file is correct.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879297</id>
	<title>Re:A Little Bit Backwards?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1256562180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Peter: I think you are a fu-HALT, FULL STOP. EXCEPTION ERROR. ALTERNATE VALUE -n person and a brilliant leader!</p></div><p>You call that getting out of trouble? Do you really not see the long-term effects of this behavior?? I call that "trouble". And you fully deserve being treated that way, for acting like this.<br>Protip: If you don't learn to say "NO", you'll end up as a slave. But hey, it's nothing bad for me. In fact it strengthens me if I can exploit you. So please, keep on doing it!</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Son: Hey dad, what's an erection?</p></div><p>And what's your problem with that one? Tell him, for god's sake. We're not in the dark ages anymore!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Peter : I think you are a fu-HALT , FULL STOP .
EXCEPTION ERROR .
ALTERNATE VALUE -n person and a brilliant leader ! You call that getting out of trouble ?
Do you really not see the long-term effects of this behavior ? ?
I call that " trouble " .
And you fully deserve being treated that way , for acting like this.Protip : If you do n't learn to say " NO " , you 'll end up as a slave .
But hey , it 's nothing bad for me .
In fact it strengthens me if I can exploit you .
So please , keep on doing it ! Son : Hey dad , what 's an erection ? And what 's your problem with that one ?
Tell him , for god 's sake .
We 're not in the dark ages anymore !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Peter: I think you are a fu-HALT, FULL STOP.
EXCEPTION ERROR.
ALTERNATE VALUE -n person and a brilliant leader!You call that getting out of trouble?
Do you really not see the long-term effects of this behavior??
I call that "trouble".
And you fully deserve being treated that way, for acting like this.Protip: If you don't learn to say "NO", you'll end up as a slave.
But hey, it's nothing bad for me.
In fact it strengthens me if I can exploit you.
So please, keep on doing it!Son: Hey dad, what's an erection?And what's your problem with that one?
Tell him, for god's sake.
We're not in the dark ages anymore!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879657</id>
	<title>Re:First Person Shooters</title>
	<author>QuantumG</author>
	<datestamp>1256565000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There wont be a generation 2.  No-one is buying the generation 1 glasses.. so there's no money to develop the generation 2 glasses.  Until someone who is sufficiently passionate about this stuff develops it on their own dime and then has enough business smarts to actually get the product to market, we're never going to have the "virtual light" displays.  Maybe some funding channel will open up one day and we'll get government development of this technology, but NASA and the military seem to still be blown away by regular head tracking head mounted displays and CAVE systems, so it won't be for decades if ever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There wont be a generation 2 .
No-one is buying the generation 1 glasses.. so there 's no money to develop the generation 2 glasses .
Until someone who is sufficiently passionate about this stuff develops it on their own dime and then has enough business smarts to actually get the product to market , we 're never going to have the " virtual light " displays .
Maybe some funding channel will open up one day and we 'll get government development of this technology , but NASA and the military seem to still be blown away by regular head tracking head mounted displays and CAVE systems , so it wo n't be for decades if ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There wont be a generation 2.
No-one is buying the generation 1 glasses.. so there's no money to develop the generation 2 glasses.
Until someone who is sufficiently passionate about this stuff develops it on their own dime and then has enough business smarts to actually get the product to market, we're never going to have the "virtual light" displays.
Maybe some funding channel will open up one day and we'll get government development of this technology, but NASA and the military seem to still be blown away by regular head tracking head mounted displays and CAVE systems, so it won't be for decades if ever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878103</id>
	<title>Not me</title>
	<author>HangingChad</author>
	<datestamp>1256554440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not projecting anything directly on my retinas until there has been at least 5 years of letting large numbers of other people test the safety of doing that on their eyes.

</p><p>If it works out it really holds promise for people with color blindness and other vision problems.  Not to mention the possibilities for enhanced reality.  Talking to some gal while Googling for naked pictures of her and then trying line up the body image with her real face while you're talking.

</p><p>No, not distracting at all...what was the question?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not projecting anything directly on my retinas until there has been at least 5 years of letting large numbers of other people test the safety of doing that on their eyes .
If it works out it really holds promise for people with color blindness and other vision problems .
Not to mention the possibilities for enhanced reality .
Talking to some gal while Googling for naked pictures of her and then trying line up the body image with her real face while you 're talking .
No , not distracting at all...what was the question ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not projecting anything directly on my retinas until there has been at least 5 years of letting large numbers of other people test the safety of doing that on their eyes.
If it works out it really holds promise for people with color blindness and other vision problems.
Not to mention the possibilities for enhanced reality.
Talking to some gal while Googling for naked pictures of her and then trying line up the body image with her real face while you're talking.
No, not distracting at all...what was the question?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29883987</id>
	<title>Re:A Little Bit Backwards?</title>
	<author>BooRolla</author>
	<datestamp>1256659080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I like how error messages of the future are still stuck in 1980 lingo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like how error messages of the future are still stuck in 1980 lingo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like how error messages of the future are still stuck in 1980 lingo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879813</id>
	<title>Re:Tsk. That's the best Simpsons meme you've got?</title>
	<author>f()rK()\_Bomb</author>
	<datestamp>1256566440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wouldnt call it vaporware, since the technology exists and is already in use. Its a military tech, just trickling down to civilians now. James Cameron used it for the upcoming Avatar film.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wouldnt call it vaporware , since the technology exists and is already in use .
Its a military tech , just trickling down to civilians now .
James Cameron used it for the upcoming Avatar film .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldnt call it vaporware, since the technology exists and is already in use.
Its a military tech, just trickling down to civilians now.
James Cameron used it for the upcoming Avatar film.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878025</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29891633</id>
	<title>Re:A Little Bit Backwards?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256649360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;Wife: How do these pants make my butt look?</p><p>Husband: They're pants?  I thought it was a dust cover for a hummer.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; When I took them off the line it took four marines to fold them. etc etc</p><p>(more stolen Simpsons material)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Wife : How do these pants make my butt look ? Husband : They 're pants ?
I thought it was a dust cover for a hummer .
                  When I took them off the line it took four marines to fold them .
etc etc ( more stolen Simpsons material )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Wife: How do these pants make my butt look?Husband: They're pants?
I thought it was a dust cover for a hummer.
                  When I took them off the line it took four marines to fold them.
etc etc(more stolen Simpsons material)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879573</id>
	<title>After Dark.....</title>
	<author>IHC Navistar</author>
	<datestamp>1256564280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't want to sound too harsh, but they'd better be DAMNED sure to include a screensaver. The last thing you want is to have an undesirable image 'burned-in' (not literally, but I'm pretty confident that overstimulating receptors could lead to degeneration) so that you see it constantly.</p><p>If they do use screensavers, I hope they include:</p><p>1: Lunitic Fringe<br>2: Starfield<br>3: Flying Toasters</p><p>Honestly, the market potential for a new version of AfterDark is huge!!!1!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't want to sound too harsh , but they 'd better be DAMNED sure to include a screensaver .
The last thing you want is to have an undesirable image 'burned-in ' ( not literally , but I 'm pretty confident that overstimulating receptors could lead to degeneration ) so that you see it constantly.If they do use screensavers , I hope they include : 1 : Lunitic Fringe2 : Starfield3 : Flying ToastersHonestly , the market potential for a new version of AfterDark is huge ! !
! 1 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't want to sound too harsh, but they'd better be DAMNED sure to include a screensaver.
The last thing you want is to have an undesirable image 'burned-in' (not literally, but I'm pretty confident that overstimulating receptors could lead to degeneration) so that you see it constantly.If they do use screensavers, I hope they include:1: Lunitic Fringe2: Starfield3: Flying ToastersHonestly, the market potential for a new version of AfterDark is huge!!
!1!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879087</id>
	<title>Re:Or you could buy something now</title>
	<author>Zerth</author>
	<datestamp>1256560620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except the bit where the resolution is only 428x240.</p><p>Even their $400 model is only 640x480.(That's the AR version, the one you linked is for watching Ipod video)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except the bit where the resolution is only 428x240.Even their $ 400 model is only 640x480 .
( That 's the AR version , the one you linked is for watching Ipod video )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except the bit where the resolution is only 428x240.Even their $400 model is only 640x480.
(That's the AR version, the one you linked is for watching Ipod video)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877539</id>
	<title>"Fun" Mods</title>
	<author>StaticEngine</author>
	<datestamp>1256552100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Replace that low power LED with a super-high-power multi-Watt LED!</p><p>Hilarity ensues!</p><p>(As does screaming, and permanant blindness.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Replace that low power LED with a super-high-power multi-Watt LED ! Hilarity ensues !
( As does screaming , and permanant blindness .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Replace that low power LED with a super-high-power multi-Watt LED!Hilarity ensues!
(As does screaming, and permanant blindness.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879839</id>
	<title>Re:Prototype in article doesn't seem very practica</title>
	<author>roguetrick</author>
	<datestamp>1256566680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was gonna do it but then I was thinking you'd hit my hand and gouge out my eye.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was gon na do it but then I was thinking you 'd hit my hand and gouge out my eye .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was gonna do it but then I was thinking you'd hit my hand and gouge out my eye.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877861</id>
	<title>They can beam</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256553360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but they can pay me for the use of my Hardware - same as they do for billboards</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but they can pay me for the use of my Hardware - same as they do for billboards</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but they can pay me for the use of my Hardware - same as they do for billboards</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878079</id>
	<title>Subtitles for real life?</title>
	<author>tengeta</author>
	<datestamp>1256554320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously? For disabled people this is great, but otherwise its 1. lazy and 2. going to get spam broadcasting right into peoples heads.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously ?
For disabled people this is great , but otherwise its 1. lazy and 2. going to get spam broadcasting right into peoples heads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously?
For disabled people this is great, but otherwise its 1. lazy and 2. going to get spam broadcasting right into peoples heads.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878771</id>
	<title>End of windows+D (and alt+tab)</title>
	<author>DavMz</author>
	<datestamp>1256558580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who needs those key combinations when you have your non-work related documents projected directly on your retina, as opposed to on the same screen as your urgent work related documents, and you see/hear your boss coming?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who needs those key combinations when you have your non-work related documents projected directly on your retina , as opposed to on the same screen as your urgent work related documents , and you see/hear your boss coming ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who needs those key combinations when you have your non-work related documents projected directly on your retina, as opposed to on the same screen as your urgent work related documents, and you see/hear your boss coming?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877715</id>
	<title>First Person Shooters</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256552820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This will be awesome for 3d games (first person shooters).<br>One image per eye, producing a 3d scene.</p><p>I imagine generation 1 will look weird with all the images being in focus, even though the Z distance varies.<br>With a little more work, generation 2 could detect what you are trying to focus on - like those eye test machines do - and produce a more realistic scene - blurry in the background, sharp foreground.</p><p>It would be cool to hit a key and have the scene zoom on what you're looking at.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This will be awesome for 3d games ( first person shooters ) .One image per eye , producing a 3d scene.I imagine generation 1 will look weird with all the images being in focus , even though the Z distance varies.With a little more work , generation 2 could detect what you are trying to focus on - like those eye test machines do - and produce a more realistic scene - blurry in the background , sharp foreground.It would be cool to hit a key and have the scene zoom on what you 're looking at .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will be awesome for 3d games (first person shooters).One image per eye, producing a 3d scene.I imagine generation 1 will look weird with all the images being in focus, even though the Z distance varies.With a little more work, generation 2 could detect what you are trying to focus on - like those eye test machines do - and produce a more realistic scene - blurry in the background, sharp foreground.It would be cool to hit a key and have the scene zoom on what you're looking at.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881089</id>
	<title>Re:How big again?</title>
	<author>tsotha</author>
	<datestamp>1256583780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, that was my first thought.  The thing had better correct for my aging eyes, or it'll look like a ten centimeter box of nothing hanging in the air.  I can do that with an old flashbulb.

</p><p>On the other hand, it might be just about right for an aiming reticle.  Always wanted a skull gun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , that was my first thought .
The thing had better correct for my aging eyes , or it 'll look like a ten centimeter box of nothing hanging in the air .
I can do that with an old flashbulb .
On the other hand , it might be just about right for an aiming reticle .
Always wanted a skull gun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, that was my first thought.
The thing had better correct for my aging eyes, or it'll look like a ten centimeter box of nothing hanging in the air.
I can do that with an old flashbulb.
On the other hand, it might be just about right for an aiming reticle.
Always wanted a skull gun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877773</id>
	<title>Re:oblig</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256553060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When my fists can look like disembodied vaginas i'll never leave the house again. There's delivery services for tissue paper right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>When my fists can look like disembodied vaginas i 'll never leave the house again .
There 's delivery services for tissue paper right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When my fists can look like disembodied vaginas i'll never leave the house again.
There's delivery services for tissue paper right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877449</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877967</id>
	<title>Re:Or you could buy something now</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1256553840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So with these goggles, two high resolution webcams, and a netbook, I could have an expensive "vision replacement system" which would work less well than nothing at all.</p><p>As Spock would say, "Fascinating."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So with these goggles , two high resolution webcams , and a netbook , I could have an expensive " vision replacement system " which would work less well than nothing at all.As Spock would say , " Fascinating .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So with these goggles, two high resolution webcams, and a netbook, I could have an expensive "vision replacement system" which would work less well than nothing at all.As Spock would say, "Fascinating.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878471</id>
	<title>Imagine the scams I could pull off!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256556540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This would be great for liars! Combine facial recognition with a recent lies' database and voila! Most consistent liar ever! Finally, an invention for us sociopaths!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This would be great for liars !
Combine facial recognition with a recent lies ' database and voila !
Most consistent liar ever !
Finally , an invention for us sociopaths !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would be great for liars!
Combine facial recognition with a recent lies' database and voila!
Most consistent liar ever!
Finally, an invention for us sociopaths!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879007</id>
	<title>Google Goggles</title>
	<author>jdbuz</author>
	<datestamp>1256560140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; as yet unnamed goggles

Google Goggles, of course! Oakley Omnis? Apple Eye's?</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; as yet unnamed goggles Google Goggles , of course !
Oakley Omnis ?
Apple Eye 's ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; as yet unnamed goggles

Google Goggles, of course!
Oakley Omnis?
Apple Eye's?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879997</id>
	<title>Re:Tsk. That's the best Simpsons meme you've got?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256568360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>lol, misquoted, the correct one is</p><p>MY EYES! THE GOGGLES DO NOTHING!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lol , misquoted , the correct one isMY EYES !
THE GOGGLES DO NOTHING !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lol, misquoted, the correct one isMY EYES!
THE GOGGLES DO NOTHING!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878025</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878401</id>
	<title>First pass a law.....</title>
	<author>stoicfaux</author>
	<datestamp>1256556000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>prohibiting people from operating a vehicle while wearing them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>prohibiting people from operating a vehicle while wearing them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>prohibiting people from operating a vehicle while wearing them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29882229</id>
	<title>mount a camera rear facing..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256648100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and Viola! Instant eyes in the back of your head!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and Viola !
Instant eyes in the back of your head !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and Viola!
Instant eyes in the back of your head!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878275</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory joke</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256555280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>then windows mobile for retina displays crashes, the beam stops moving and burns a small hole in your retina before you can close your eye.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>then windows mobile for retina displays crashes , the beam stops moving and burns a small hole in your retina before you can close your eye .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>then windows mobile for retina displays crashes, the beam stops moving and burns a small hole in your retina before you can close your eye.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879835</id>
	<title>Air Yeezy Mid shoe-Chanel handbag-Ed Hardy Jams</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256566620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; welcome to view our store.<br>1)best price and excellent quality  products.<br>2) More product pictures are available on our website.<br>3) We can supply 100\% safe door to door shipping</p><p>services.<br>4) Small trial orders is accepted.<br>5) The goods are shipped by air express, such as</p><p>EMS, UPS, TNT, DHL, and FDEX...<br>6) The shipping time is in 5- 7 business days .<br>7) The quality is excellent .<br>8) These shoes on the website are in stock now<br>9) We accept paypal +++aaa quality .</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; welcme to contact us for more infomation about</p><p>our products<br>.<br>OUR WEBSITE:</p><p>YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn</p><p>MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Http://www.tntshoes.com</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>        welcome to view our store.1 ) best price and excellent quality products.2 ) More product pictures are available on our website.3 ) We can supply 100 \ % safe door to door shippingservices.4 ) Small trial orders is accepted.5 ) The goods are shipped by air express , such asEMS , UPS , TNT , DHL , and FDEX...6 ) The shipping time is in 5- 7 business days .7 ) The quality is excellent .8 ) These shoes on the website are in stock now9 ) We accept paypal + + + aaa quality .
                  welcme to contact us for more infomation aboutour products.OUR WEBSITE : YAHOO : shoppertrade @ yahoo.com.cnMSN : shoppertrade @ hotmail.com                                                                   Http : //www.tntshoes.com    </tokentext>
<sentencetext>
        welcome to view our store.1)best price and excellent quality  products.2) More product pictures are available on our website.3) We can supply 100\% safe door to door shippingservices.4) Small trial orders is accepted.5) The goods are shipped by air express, such asEMS, UPS, TNT, DHL, and FDEX...6) The shipping time is in 5- 7 business days .7) The quality is excellent .8) These shoes on the website are in stock now9) We accept paypal +++aaa quality .
                  welcme to contact us for more infomation aboutour products.OUR WEBSITE:YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cnMSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com
                                                                  Http://www.tntshoes.com
   </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879509</id>
	<title>Re:Finally I could run for political office</title>
	<author>funkatron</author>
	<datestamp>1256563740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You dont need technology fo that! Just do what everyone else in politics does; use the name Liberal for everyone you cant remember.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You dont need technology fo that !
Just do what everyone else in politics does ; use the name Liberal for everyone you cant remember .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You dont need technology fo that!
Just do what everyone else in politics does; use the name Liberal for everyone you cant remember.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881517</id>
	<title>Re:Prototype in article doesn't seem very practica</title>
	<author>rhdv</author>
	<datestamp>1256634720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was not very clear in my original post. The image projected on the retina must be in focus, right?<p>Ergo the system must somehow do a continuous auto-focus on the changing properties of the lens of your eye as you are automatically adapting your lens to the distance of the object you intend to see. If that isn't the case, your one eye will continuously try to focus on the projected image and the other eye will try to focus on the outside world. I can tell you that <em>that</em> is arduous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was not very clear in my original post .
The image projected on the retina must be in focus , right ? Ergo the system must somehow do a continuous auto-focus on the changing properties of the lens of your eye as you are automatically adapting your lens to the distance of the object you intend to see .
If that is n't the case , your one eye will continuously try to focus on the projected image and the other eye will try to focus on the outside world .
I can tell you that that is arduous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was not very clear in my original post.
The image projected on the retina must be in focus, right?Ergo the system must somehow do a continuous auto-focus on the changing properties of the lens of your eye as you are automatically adapting your lens to the distance of the object you intend to see.
If that isn't the case, your one eye will continuously try to focus on the projected image and the other eye will try to focus on the outside world.
I can tell you that that is arduous.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879571</id>
	<title>Re:Old technology?</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1256564220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That it uses laser to scan a raster directly on the retina.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That it uses laser to scan a raster directly on the retina .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That it uses laser to scan a raster directly on the retina.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878531</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877781</id>
	<title>How big again?</title>
	<author>overshoot</author>
	<datestamp>1256553060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>10 cm square at one meter?<p>

No matter how good the focus is, 800x600 is wasted at that small a visual angle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>10 cm square at one meter ?
No matter how good the focus is , 800x600 is wasted at that small a visual angle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10 cm square at one meter?
No matter how good the focus is, 800x600 is wasted at that small a visual angle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879801</id>
	<title>Live subtitles are not so great</title>
	<author>evilsofa</author>
	<datestamp>1256566320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just turn on the subtitles for Survivor or The Amazing Race, and you'll see real-time live steno-captioning that's as good as it gets - with a 5 second delay, which is unusable even on TV, much less live conversation.  I happen to know this about those shows because, being severely deaf, I managed to get a reply to a complaint about the inadequate subtitling of those shows.  Believe me, I would love to have subtitles on real life, but I really don't think the tech is up to it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just turn on the subtitles for Survivor or The Amazing Race , and you 'll see real-time live steno-captioning that 's as good as it gets - with a 5 second delay , which is unusable even on TV , much less live conversation .
I happen to know this about those shows because , being severely deaf , I managed to get a reply to a complaint about the inadequate subtitling of those shows .
Believe me , I would love to have subtitles on real life , but I really do n't think the tech is up to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just turn on the subtitles for Survivor or The Amazing Race, and you'll see real-time live steno-captioning that's as good as it gets - with a 5 second delay, which is unusable even on TV, much less live conversation.
I happen to know this about those shows because, being severely deaf, I managed to get a reply to a complaint about the inadequate subtitling of those shows.
Believe me, I would love to have subtitles on real life, but I really don't think the tech is up to it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879061</id>
	<title>Does it work like this?</title>
	<author>ztexas</author>
	<datestamp>1256560500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Demo 20 seconds into this vid:
<a href="http://www.adultswim.com/video/?episodeID=095290d81130331d905bbdf900ab219a" title="adultswim.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.adultswim.com/video/?episodeID=095290d81130331d905bbdf900ab219a</a> [adultswim.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Demo 20 seconds into this vid : http : //www.adultswim.com/video/ ? episodeID = 095290d81130331d905bbdf900ab219a [ adultswim.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Demo 20 seconds into this vid:
http://www.adultswim.com/video/?episodeID=095290d81130331d905bbdf900ab219a [adultswim.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878077</id>
	<title>3D &amp; the Environment</title>
	<author>CatoNine</author>
	<datestamp>1256554320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally, perfecting this technology will be the final introduction of *true* 3D (2.5D).<br>(Without the need for extra glasses<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)<br>And it will be the end of big TV screens sucking up power and manufacturing resources.<br>As a bonus, in games I can really look around with my head.<br>Can't wait...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , perfecting this technology will be the final introduction of * true * 3D ( 2.5D ) .
( Without the need for extra glasses ; - ) And it will be the end of big TV screens sucking up power and manufacturing resources.As a bonus , in games I can really look around with my head.Ca n't wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, perfecting this technology will be the final introduction of *true* 3D (2.5D).
(Without the need for extra glasses ;-)And it will be the end of big TV screens sucking up power and manufacturing resources.As a bonus, in games I can really look around with my head.Can't wait...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877835</id>
	<title>10 cm x 10 cm or 10 cm^2?</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1256553300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Engadget article says "<i>10-centimeter wide image</i>" where as the Register article that Engadget uses at its source says <i>a 10cm^2 object</i>.</p><p>That's quite a difference. If the image displayed is also in 4:3, that makes the Engadget image 7.5 times larger (10x7.5 cms).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Engadget article says " 10-centimeter wide image " where as the Register article that Engadget uses at its source says a 10cm ^ 2 object.That 's quite a difference .
If the image displayed is also in 4 : 3 , that makes the Engadget image 7.5 times larger ( 10x7.5 cms ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Engadget article says "10-centimeter wide image" where as the Register article that Engadget uses at its source says a 10cm^2 object.That's quite a difference.
If the image displayed is also in 4:3, that makes the Engadget image 7.5 times larger (10x7.5 cms).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879305</id>
	<title>Beer Goggles</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256562240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Software development for this thing could fun. Imagine creating a filter for a shallow hal type of effect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Software development for this thing could fun .
Imagine creating a filter for a shallow hal type of effect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Software development for this thing could fun.
Imagine creating a filter for a shallow hal type of effect.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878053</id>
	<title>Head On</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1256554200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank you, I was previously unaware of this product.</p><p>You can die now. Your life is complete.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you , I was previously unaware of this product.You can die now .
Your life is complete .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you, I was previously unaware of this product.You can die now.
Your life is complete.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877979</id>
	<title>Re:Finally I could run for political office</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256553900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I always remember asses, but names are tough. Here I could finally know everyone's name (combined with some ass recognition software).</p></div><p>
&nbsp; <br>Fixed it.<br>
&nbsp; <br>I don't know, it just felt right.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always remember asses , but names are tough .
Here I could finally know everyone 's name ( combined with some ass recognition software ) .
  Fixed it .
  I do n't know , it just felt right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always remember asses, but names are tough.
Here I could finally know everyone's name (combined with some ass recognition software).
  Fixed it.
  I don't know, it just felt right.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878437</id>
	<title>Re:10 cm x 10 cm or 10 cm^2?</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1256556360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(10cm)^2 !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( 10cm ) ^ 2 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(10cm)^2 !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877835</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878223</id>
	<title>Too bad it won't work well for me</title>
	<author>haaz</author>
	<datestamp>1256554980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not that I want any advertising blasted onto my retinas as it is... but <a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/03/24/089246&amp;mode=thread" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">this event saw to it</a> [slashdot.org] that my left eye became pretty well useless for this application. No pun intended.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not that I want any advertising blasted onto my retinas as it is... but this event saw to it [ slashdot.org ] that my left eye became pretty well useless for this application .
No pun intended .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not that I want any advertising blasted onto my retinas as it is... but this event saw to it [slashdot.org] that my left eye became pretty well useless for this application.
No pun intended.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879719</id>
	<title>Screensavers?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256565480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would one use screensavers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would one use screensavers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would one use screensavers?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877629</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877629</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory joke</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256552520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not just projecting onto the retina - projecting directly onto the retina <b>with lasers</b>.
<br> <br>
Many people shy away from laser eye surgery - I can imagine this device will be a bit difficult to market. Imagine the "phosphor burn" effect on your retina.... not pretty. My bet is that this won't appear in the lawsuit-happy USA any day soon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not just projecting onto the retina - projecting directly onto the retina with lasers .
Many people shy away from laser eye surgery - I can imagine this device will be a bit difficult to market .
Imagine the " phosphor burn " effect on your retina.... not pretty .
My bet is that this wo n't appear in the lawsuit-happy USA any day soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not just projecting onto the retina - projecting directly onto the retina with lasers.
Many people shy away from laser eye surgery - I can imagine this device will be a bit difficult to market.
Imagine the "phosphor burn" effect on your retina.... not pretty.
My bet is that this won't appear in the lawsuit-happy USA any day soon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29880919</id>
	<title>Ads</title>
	<author>mxh83</author>
	<datestamp>1256580180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now we can have ads beamed directly to our retinas.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now we can have ads beamed directly to our retinas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now we can have ads beamed directly to our retinas.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29880041</id>
	<title>Re:Hardware Request, Please</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256568840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since it is scanning (probably with some sort of resonant mirror setup), they should be able to crank up the resolution on the fast axis to an insane level - back o' envelope numbers:</p><p>800x600x60 = 28.8MPixels/sec - This means that the laser is modulating at about 14.4MHz. If you follow laser modulation specs, telcom lasers typically modulate well into the GHz range. If one decides to sink some R&amp;D into building a cheap GHz DAC, it would seriously be possible to do a 80000x600 display with no modification to the mechanicals. Add a third axis (scanning, shaping, whatever) to the scanner, and presto, your 0.48M pixel display is suddenly this 50Mpixel monster. Throw in more lasers and you have all the pixels you could possibly ever want.</p><p>Sigh. Of course considering how quickly HMD tech progresses (i.e. it seems to be regressing at the moment), I wouldn't bet on anyone optimizing it anytime soon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since it is scanning ( probably with some sort of resonant mirror setup ) , they should be able to crank up the resolution on the fast axis to an insane level - back o ' envelope numbers : 800x600x60 = 28.8MPixels/sec - This means that the laser is modulating at about 14.4MHz .
If you follow laser modulation specs , telcom lasers typically modulate well into the GHz range .
If one decides to sink some R&amp;D into building a cheap GHz DAC , it would seriously be possible to do a 80000x600 display with no modification to the mechanicals .
Add a third axis ( scanning , shaping , whatever ) to the scanner , and presto , your 0.48M pixel display is suddenly this 50Mpixel monster .
Throw in more lasers and you have all the pixels you could possibly ever want.Sigh .
Of course considering how quickly HMD tech progresses ( i.e .
it seems to be regressing at the moment ) , I would n't bet on anyone optimizing it anytime soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since it is scanning (probably with some sort of resonant mirror setup), they should be able to crank up the resolution on the fast axis to an insane level - back o' envelope numbers:800x600x60 = 28.8MPixels/sec - This means that the laser is modulating at about 14.4MHz.
If you follow laser modulation specs, telcom lasers typically modulate well into the GHz range.
If one decides to sink some R&amp;D into building a cheap GHz DAC, it would seriously be possible to do a 80000x600 display with no modification to the mechanicals.
Add a third axis (scanning, shaping, whatever) to the scanner, and presto, your 0.48M pixel display is suddenly this 50Mpixel monster.
Throw in more lasers and you have all the pixels you could possibly ever want.Sigh.
Of course considering how quickly HMD tech progresses (i.e.
it seems to be regressing at the moment), I wouldn't bet on anyone optimizing it anytime soon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29883123</id>
	<title>Baby steps</title>
	<author>Nerdposeur</author>
	<datestamp>1256654760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>...Also working on a retina display of its own is NEC, which apparently hopes to incorporate a microphone into their display and use it as a real-time translation device that would quite literally display subtitles as you talk to someone."</p></div></blockquote><p>That would be awesome, but isn't it a little too ambitious for a single product right now?</p><p>"Hey guys, I don't think that a safe, good, affordable retinal display system is hard enough. Let's add vocal recognition and real-time language parsing in two simultaneous languages!"</p><p>Either one of these things would be very impressive. It seems a bit much to be shooting for both before either has been done well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Also working on a retina display of its own is NEC , which apparently hopes to incorporate a microphone into their display and use it as a real-time translation device that would quite literally display subtitles as you talk to someone .
" That would be awesome , but is n't it a little too ambitious for a single product right now ?
" Hey guys , I do n't think that a safe , good , affordable retinal display system is hard enough .
Let 's add vocal recognition and real-time language parsing in two simultaneous languages !
" Either one of these things would be very impressive .
It seems a bit much to be shooting for both before either has been done well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Also working on a retina display of its own is NEC, which apparently hopes to incorporate a microphone into their display and use it as a real-time translation device that would quite literally display subtitles as you talk to someone.
"That would be awesome, but isn't it a little too ambitious for a single product right now?
"Hey guys, I don't think that a safe, good, affordable retinal display system is hard enough.
Let's add vocal recognition and real-time language parsing in two simultaneous languages!
"Either one of these things would be very impressive.
It seems a bit much to be shooting for both before either has been done well.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881661</id>
	<title>Boring....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256637420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>10x10 cm?</p><p>Call me again when they stream HD porn directly into my frontal lobe. Or whatever it is I see with. Or get an erection. You know what I mean.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>10x10 cm ? Call me again when they stream HD porn directly into my frontal lobe .
Or whatever it is I see with .
Or get an erection .
You know what I mean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10x10 cm?Call me again when they stream HD porn directly into my frontal lobe.
Or whatever it is I see with.
Or get an erection.
You know what I mean.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877759</id>
	<title>Imagine this</title>
	<author>abbynormal brain</author>
	<datestamp>1256553000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine a world with many "blank" surfaces<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... dull? Not without your wireless network retina vision (WNRV) - projected advertisement on "billboard surfaces" just around the (metaphorical) corner!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine a world with many " blank " surfaces ... dull ? Not without your wireless network retina vision ( WNRV ) - projected advertisement on " billboard surfaces " just around the ( metaphorical ) corner !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine a world with many "blank" surfaces ... dull? Not without your wireless network retina vision (WNRV) - projected advertisement on "billboard surfaces" just around the (metaphorical) corner!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877881</id>
	<title>Hardware Request, Please</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256553420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Given the size of the Prototype shown in TFA, how much heart burn would it be to make the hardware 1600x1200? Basically use 4 units combined into one?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Given the size of the Prototype shown in TFA , how much heart burn would it be to make the hardware 1600x1200 ?
Basically use 4 units combined into one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given the size of the Prototype shown in TFA, how much heart burn would it be to make the hardware 1600x1200?
Basically use 4 units combined into one?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29886651</id>
	<title>Finally !</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1256670900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now for someone to create a marketroid to english translator.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now for someone to create a marketroid to english translator .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now for someone to create a marketroid to english translator.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879921</id>
	<title>Bablefish for your retna?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256567460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I look forward to all the comical misunderstandings this will cause<br>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I look forward to all the comical misunderstandings this will cause .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I look forward to all the comical misunderstandings this will cause.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877449</id>
	<title>oblig</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256551740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I for one welcome the retina-porn overlords</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome the retina-porn overlords</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome the retina-porn overlords</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879327</id>
	<title>Re:Finally I could run for political office</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1256562420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure, as long as they don't grow a beard or smile.  So as long as you're not interested in men and/or funny, you should be good to go.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , as long as they do n't grow a beard or smile .
So as long as you 're not interested in men and/or funny , you should be good to go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, as long as they don't grow a beard or smile.
So as long as you're not interested in men and/or funny, you should be good to go.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879013</id>
	<title>Re:Invasion?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256560140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because it is being used in an advertising rather than literal sense? "Invading stores!" "Invading your TV!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it is being used in an advertising rather than literal sense ?
" Invading stores !
" " Invading your TV !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it is being used in an advertising rather than literal sense?
"Invading stores!
" "Invading your TV!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877719</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879205</id>
	<title>Pffft</title>
	<author>KingTank</author>
	<datestamp>1256561400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I already have a monitor that beams an image onto my retinas at much higher resolution than that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I already have a monitor that beams an image onto my retinas at much higher resolution than that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I already have a monitor that beams an image onto my retinas at much higher resolution than that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877919</id>
	<title>Cool!</title>
	<author>Singularity42</author>
	<datestamp>1256553660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I found a bluetooth headset that does mono A2DP (bluetooth audio streaming) and enjoy listening to podcasts while doing whatever.  I'd have no problems keeping this on as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I found a bluetooth headset that does mono A2DP ( bluetooth audio streaming ) and enjoy listening to podcasts while doing whatever .
I 'd have no problems keeping this on as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I found a bluetooth headset that does mono A2DP (bluetooth audio streaming) and enjoy listening to podcasts while doing whatever.
I'd have no problems keeping this on as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29887077</id>
	<title>Re:A Little Bit Backwards?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256672640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>...a real-time translation device that would quite literally display subtitles as you talk to someone.</p></div><p>Wouldn't it make more sense to display subtitles as <i>someone</i> talks to <i>you</i>?</p></div><p>Only in Soviet Russia.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...a real-time translation device that would quite literally display subtitles as you talk to someone.Would n't it make more sense to display subtitles as someone talks to you ? Only in Soviet Russia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...a real-time translation device that would quite literally display subtitles as you talk to someone.Wouldn't it make more sense to display subtitles as someone talks to you?Only in Soviet Russia.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877455</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29883607</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory joke</title>
	<author>laughing\_badger</author>
	<datestamp>1256657340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They will just ensure that the word laser doesn't appear anywhere. These will be 'display goggles with photon-stream (TM) technology'. See the change of NMR into MRI.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They will just ensure that the word laser does n't appear anywhere .
These will be 'display goggles with photon-stream ( TM ) technology' .
See the change of NMR into MRI .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They will just ensure that the word laser doesn't appear anywhere.
These will be 'display goggles with photon-stream (TM) technology'.
See the change of NMR into MRI.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877629</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878313</id>
	<title>Problems, yeah</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1256555460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Naturally, there are a few considerable limitations compared to more traditional displays,</p></div><p>There's also the problem of me taking a hammer to any system that tries to project something onto my godamned retina. I'm not kidding, Brother/NEC. My hammer, your fucking projector, guaranteed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Naturally , there are a few considerable limitations compared to more traditional displays,There 's also the problem of me taking a hammer to any system that tries to project something onto my godamned retina .
I 'm not kidding , Brother/NEC .
My hammer , your fucking projector , guaranteed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Naturally, there are a few considerable limitations compared to more traditional displays,There's also the problem of me taking a hammer to any system that tries to project something onto my godamned retina.
I'm not kidding, Brother/NEC.
My hammer, your fucking projector, guaranteed.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29880187</id>
	<title>What about us nerds?</title>
	<author>sajuuk</author>
	<datestamp>1256570580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, the nerds who wear glasses and as such can't safely wear the thing depicted in TFA.  If i have to get contacts just to use this thing, forget it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , the nerds who wear glasses and as such ca n't safely wear the thing depicted in TFA .
If i have to get contacts just to use this thing , forget it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, the nerds who wear glasses and as such can't safely wear the thing depicted in TFA.
If i have to get contacts just to use this thing, forget it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878245</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory joke</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256555100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are many applications to this... http://www.microvision.com/wearable\_displays/index.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are many applications to this... http : //www.microvision.com/wearable \ _displays/index.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are many applications to this... http://www.microvision.com/wearable\_displays/index.html</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881929</id>
	<title>Re:"Fun" Mods</title>
	<author>Genda</author>
	<datestamp>1256642340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This device serves double duty... while it's smoking your retina, friends and family can enjoy the image being projected on the back of your head!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This device serves double duty... while it 's smoking your retina , friends and family can enjoy the image being projected on the back of your head !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This device serves double duty... while it's smoking your retina, friends and family can enjoy the image being projected on the back of your head!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877539</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877877</id>
	<title>Hopefully society will rid us of the faggots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256553420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Faggots suck the shit out of other faggots asses and suck their own shit off the dicks of other faggots. They're diseased and they add nothing to society. They need to be removed from society for once and for all for draining resources from good living people.<br>
&nbsp; <br>The more faggots that just kill themselves the better our lives will all be.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Faggots suck the shit out of other faggots asses and suck their own shit off the dicks of other faggots .
They 're diseased and they add nothing to society .
They need to be removed from society for once and for all for draining resources from good living people .
  The more faggots that just kill themselves the better our lives will all be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Faggots suck the shit out of other faggots asses and suck their own shit off the dicks of other faggots.
They're diseased and they add nothing to society.
They need to be removed from society for once and for all for draining resources from good living people.
  The more faggots that just kill themselves the better our lives will all be.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878303</id>
	<title>Back in 1999...</title>
	<author>Amarantine</author>
	<datestamp>1256555340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...so ten years ago, i had the pleasure of visiting a startup (back then) called Microvision, developing what seems to me like exactly the same thing. Looking at their site now, they are still in business and working on the same stuff, which i think is cool. <br> <br>I recall wearing a similar device, with a Windows 98 desktop being laser-projected directly on my eye, altough at 640x480. I recall the nervousness of what would happen if lightning would strike at that very moment. Just the idea of a Windows desktop etched on my retina...</htmltext>
<tokenext>...so ten years ago , i had the pleasure of visiting a startup ( back then ) called Microvision , developing what seems to me like exactly the same thing .
Looking at their site now , they are still in business and working on the same stuff , which i think is cool .
I recall wearing a similar device , with a Windows 98 desktop being laser-projected directly on my eye , altough at 640x480 .
I recall the nervousness of what would happen if lightning would strike at that very moment .
Just the idea of a Windows desktop etched on my retina.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...so ten years ago, i had the pleasure of visiting a startup (back then) called Microvision, developing what seems to me like exactly the same thing.
Looking at their site now, they are still in business and working on the same stuff, which i think is cool.
I recall wearing a similar device, with a Windows 98 desktop being laser-projected directly on my eye, altough at 640x480.
I recall the nervousness of what would happen if lightning would strike at that very moment.
Just the idea of a Windows desktop etched on my retina...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878235</id>
	<title>Lumus already doing this for several years...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256555040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But I don't know when it's coming to consumer-level market:<br>http://lumus-optical.com/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But I do n't know when it 's coming to consumer-level market : http : //lumus-optical.com/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I don't know when it's coming to consumer-level market:http://lumus-optical.com/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879511</id>
	<title>Burn-in problem.</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1256563800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know when you look at a pattern really long, you get that burn-in effect.</p><p>Now imagine it, about 10,000 times stronger. Must be "fun"...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know when you look at a pattern really long , you get that burn-in effect.Now imagine it , about 10,000 times stronger .
Must be " fun " .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know when you look at a pattern really long, you get that burn-in effect.Now imagine it, about 10,000 times stronger.
Must be "fun"...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878025</id>
	<title>Tsk.  That's the best Simpsons meme you've got?</title>
	<author>Valdrax</author>
	<datestamp>1256554080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Naturally, there are a few considerable limitations compared to more traditional displays, but the company's as yet unnamed goggles do <b>promise</b> to beam an 800 x 600 image directly into your retina that'll appear as a 10-centimeter wide image floating about one meter in front of them -- which is certainly no small feat, even if it may not be the most practical one.</p></div><p>I would've pointed out that this is currently vaporware.<br>In other words:  THE GOGGLES!  THEY DO NOTHING!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Naturally , there are a few considerable limitations compared to more traditional displays , but the company 's as yet unnamed goggles do promise to beam an 800 x 600 image directly into your retina that 'll appear as a 10-centimeter wide image floating about one meter in front of them -- which is certainly no small feat , even if it may not be the most practical one.I would 've pointed out that this is currently vaporware.In other words : THE GOGGLES !
THEY DO NOTHING !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Naturally, there are a few considerable limitations compared to more traditional displays, but the company's as yet unnamed goggles do promise to beam an 800 x 600 image directly into your retina that'll appear as a 10-centimeter wide image floating about one meter in front of them -- which is certainly no small feat, even if it may not be the most practical one.I would've pointed out that this is currently vaporware.In other words:  THE GOGGLES!
THEY DO NOTHING!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877449</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878519</id>
	<title>subtended angle</title>
	<author>wowbagger</author>
	<datestamp>1256556960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just one thing to keep in mind: the display, no matter what, won't be any larger than the subtended angle of the display apparatus as viewed by the eye. In other words, if you have a display covering 90 degrees of your field of view, then the apparatus generating that display will have to cover 90 degrees of your field of view.</p><p>Now, that apparatus may be transparent and not interfere with viewing the rest of the world in that 90 degrees, but this doesn't mean that some little bug-like object on a lamppost twenty feet away is going to be able to target your eye and draw an advertisement that subtends 90 degrees of your field of view, since the little bug-like object doesn't subtend that 90 degrees - it will be able to make an advertisement no bigger than the bug looks to you.</p><p>Really, this isn't much different than the head mounted display I was playing with years ago, which had a small mirror in front of the eye, and a display module that clipped to the side of your glasses. This just uses lasers rather than diodes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just one thing to keep in mind : the display , no matter what , wo n't be any larger than the subtended angle of the display apparatus as viewed by the eye .
In other words , if you have a display covering 90 degrees of your field of view , then the apparatus generating that display will have to cover 90 degrees of your field of view.Now , that apparatus may be transparent and not interfere with viewing the rest of the world in that 90 degrees , but this does n't mean that some little bug-like object on a lamppost twenty feet away is going to be able to target your eye and draw an advertisement that subtends 90 degrees of your field of view , since the little bug-like object does n't subtend that 90 degrees - it will be able to make an advertisement no bigger than the bug looks to you.Really , this is n't much different than the head mounted display I was playing with years ago , which had a small mirror in front of the eye , and a display module that clipped to the side of your glasses .
This just uses lasers rather than diodes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just one thing to keep in mind: the display, no matter what, won't be any larger than the subtended angle of the display apparatus as viewed by the eye.
In other words, if you have a display covering 90 degrees of your field of view, then the apparatus generating that display will have to cover 90 degrees of your field of view.Now, that apparatus may be transparent and not interfere with viewing the rest of the world in that 90 degrees, but this doesn't mean that some little bug-like object on a lamppost twenty feet away is going to be able to target your eye and draw an advertisement that subtends 90 degrees of your field of view, since the little bug-like object doesn't subtend that 90 degrees - it will be able to make an advertisement no bigger than the bug looks to you.Really, this isn't much different than the head mounted display I was playing with years ago, which had a small mirror in front of the eye, and a display module that clipped to the side of your glasses.
This just uses lasers rather than diodes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881537</id>
	<title>Big brother rather...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256635260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The telescreen is in your eyes. And who thought it would be a company amply named Brother to bring it to us?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The telescreen is in your eyes .
And who thought it would be a company amply named Brother to bring it to us ?
; -D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The telescreen is in your eyes.
And who thought it would be a company amply named Brother to bring it to us?
;-D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878687</id>
	<title>Did you see a ghost?</title>
	<author>w0mprat</author>
	<datestamp>1256558040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm personally looking forward to being able to beam images into peoples retinas. I can imagine all sorts of delightful pranks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm personally looking forward to being able to beam images into peoples retinas .
I can imagine all sorts of delightful pranks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm personally looking forward to being able to beam images into peoples retinas.
I can imagine all sorts of delightful pranks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879349</id>
	<title>closed captioning for real life</title>
	<author>freshfromthevat</author>
	<datestamp>1256562540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>closed captioning for real life<br>
&nbsp; Nice</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>closed captioning for real life   Nice</tokentext>
<sentencetext>closed captioning for real life
  Nice</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878777</id>
	<title>Re:A Little Bit Backwards?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256558640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Son: Hey dad, what's an erection?
Dad: Well, you see, it's when a man HALT, FULL STOP. EXCEPTION ERROR. ALTERNATE VALUE asks your mother.</p></div><p>I would hope the father would have more experience with what an erection is than his wife. I suppose the mother could be a doctor, nurse, whore or porn star.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Son : Hey dad , what 's an erection ?
Dad : Well , you see , it 's when a man HALT , FULL STOP .
EXCEPTION ERROR .
ALTERNATE VALUE asks your mother.I would hope the father would have more experience with what an erection is than his wife .
I suppose the mother could be a doctor , nurse , whore or porn star .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Son: Hey dad, what's an erection?
Dad: Well, you see, it's when a man HALT, FULL STOP.
EXCEPTION ERROR.
ALTERNATE VALUE asks your mother.I would hope the father would have more experience with what an erection is than his wife.
I suppose the mother could be a doctor, nurse, whore or porn star.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877819</id>
	<title>Ads</title>
	<author>Looce</author>
	<datestamp>1256553240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who knows what ads they want to burn into our retinas.</p><p>I just hope it won't be an unignorable <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAbAIpZG7II" title="youtube.com">HeadOn ad</a> [youtube.com], because <b>that</b> is liable to give me unignorable... headaches.</p><p>Now if only I had unignorable audio too, so I could know where I apply the HeadOn...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who knows what ads they want to burn into our retinas.I just hope it wo n't be an unignorable HeadOn ad [ youtube.com ] , because that is liable to give me unignorable... headaches.Now if only I had unignorable audio too , so I could know where I apply the HeadOn.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who knows what ads they want to burn into our retinas.I just hope it won't be an unignorable HeadOn ad [youtube.com], because that is liable to give me unignorable... headaches.Now if only I had unignorable audio too, so I could know where I apply the HeadOn...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878215</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory joke</title>
	<author>R2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1256554920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Seriously, though, does anybody else find the idea of projecting directly on the eye a little disturbing?"</p><p>Very.  I have had gas-permeable contacts for almost 30 years, and have no problem poking around my eyeball to bind those little bastards if they slip out of place.  But I absolutely freak out if anything else comes near my eyes.  They'd need to give me general anesthesia to perform Lasik - I don't think I'd react well to a laser projector that close.</p><p>And no, it's not rational.  BFD - I'm still not doing it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Seriously , though , does anybody else find the idea of projecting directly on the eye a little disturbing ? " Very .
I have had gas-permeable contacts for almost 30 years , and have no problem poking around my eyeball to bind those little bastards if they slip out of place .
But I absolutely freak out if anything else comes near my eyes .
They 'd need to give me general anesthesia to perform Lasik - I do n't think I 'd react well to a laser projector that close.And no , it 's not rational .
BFD - I 'm still not doing it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Seriously, though, does anybody else find the idea of projecting directly on the eye a little disturbing?"Very.
I have had gas-permeable contacts for almost 30 years, and have no problem poking around my eyeball to bind those little bastards if they slip out of place.
But I absolutely freak out if anything else comes near my eyes.
They'd need to give me general anesthesia to perform Lasik - I don't think I'd react well to a laser projector that close.And no, it's not rational.
BFD - I'm still not doing it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29880091</id>
	<title>Old Tech</title>
	<author>MountainLogic</author>
	<datestamp>1256569440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This has been around a while :


<a href="http://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/vrd/" title="washington.edu">http://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/vrd/</a> [washington.edu]


-s</htmltext>
<tokenext>This has been around a while : http : //www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/vrd/ [ washington.edu ] -s</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has been around a while :


http://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/vrd/ [washington.edu]


-s</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881061</id>
	<title>Re:Prototype in article doesn't seem very practica</title>
	<author>cgenman</author>
	<datestamp>1256583180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd been wondering what the difference was between this and the LCD or other projector displays (like myvu) currently on the market.</p><p>As far as I can tell... not a whole lot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd been wondering what the difference was between this and the LCD or other projector displays ( like myvu ) currently on the market.As far as I can tell... not a whole lot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd been wondering what the difference was between this and the LCD or other projector displays (like myvu) currently on the market.As far as I can tell... not a whole lot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877697</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878195</id>
	<title>Re:I'm no biologist...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256554860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, the lens focuses all light that is reflected or emitted by an object in the direction of the pupil and creates an image on the retina. Beaming an image onto the retina means that there is no real equivalent to the image. You are not looking at an area: the laser emitter is a point light source.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , the lens focuses all light that is reflected or emitted by an object in the direction of the pupil and creates an image on the retina .
Beaming an image onto the retina means that there is no real equivalent to the image .
You are not looking at an area : the laser emitter is a point light source .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, the lens focuses all light that is reflected or emitted by an object in the direction of the pupil and creates an image on the retina.
Beaming an image onto the retina means that there is no real equivalent to the image.
You are not looking at an area: the laser emitter is a point light source.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877455</id>
	<title>A Little Bit Backwards?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256551740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...a real-time translation device that would quite literally display subtitles as you talk to someone.</p></div><p>Wouldn't it make more sense to display subtitles as <i>someone</i> talks to <i>you</i>?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...a real-time translation device that would quite literally display subtitles as you talk to someone.Would n't it make more sense to display subtitles as someone talks to you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...a real-time translation device that would quite literally display subtitles as you talk to someone.Wouldn't it make more sense to display subtitles as someone talks to you?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877949</id>
	<title>Four thoughts...</title>
	<author>TheGreatOrangePeel</author>
	<datestamp>1256553780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><ul> <li>Thought 1: Finally. A potentially practical HUD for daily mobile computing.</li><li>Thought 2: Oh. Watch a movie at work and no one will know.</li><li>Thought 3: Huh. Watch porn wherever you are.</li><li>Thought 4: Wow. Why wasn't thought 3 thought 1?</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thought 1 : Finally .
A potentially practical HUD for daily mobile computing.Thought 2 : Oh .
Watch a movie at work and no one will know.Thought 3 : Huh .
Watch porn wherever you are.Thought 4 : Wow .
Why was n't thought 3 thought 1 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Thought 1: Finally.
A potentially practical HUD for daily mobile computing.Thought 2: Oh.
Watch a movie at work and no one will know.Thought 3: Huh.
Watch porn wherever you are.Thought 4: Wow.
Why wasn't thought 3 thought 1?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879393</id>
	<title>Re:Invasion?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1256562840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if my gift is minus one TV, minus one computer, minus one hot girl (optionally rented), and minus twenty thousand dollar? ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if my gift is minus one TV , minus one computer , minus one hot girl ( optionally rented ) , and minus twenty thousand dollar ?
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if my gift is minus one TV, minus one computer, minus one hot girl (optionally rented), and minus twenty thousand dollar?
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877719</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29880281</id>
	<title>Old hat</title>
	<author>Grimace1975</author>
	<datestamp>1256571660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.microvision.com/" title="microvision.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.microvision.com/</a> [microvision.com] has been doing this for years with their Nomad displays.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.microvision.com/ [ microvision.com ] has been doing this for years with their Nomad displays .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.microvision.com/ [microvision.com] has been doing this for years with their Nomad displays.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878737</id>
	<title>Microvision VRD (Virtual Retinal Display)...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256558340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.microvision.com</p><p>These guys have had VRD in the cooker for over ten+ years.  The HIT Lab and the University of Washington had black and white VGA displays (or better sorry it was college and a long time ago).</p><p>Kinda lost track of them and the tech seemed like another technology that was always just two years away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.microvision.comThese guys have had VRD in the cooker for over ten + years .
The HIT Lab and the University of Washington had black and white VGA displays ( or better sorry it was college and a long time ago ) .Kinda lost track of them and the tech seemed like another technology that was always just two years away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.microvision.comThese guys have had VRD in the cooker for over ten+ years.
The HIT Lab and the University of Washington had black and white VGA displays (or better sorry it was college and a long time ago).Kinda lost track of them and the tech seemed like another technology that was always just two years away.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878531</id>
	<title>Old technology?</title>
	<author>ACMENEWSLLC</author>
	<datestamp>1256557080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A girl I knew over 10 years a go had a 3D set of these hooked to her computer.  I walked around her house during a party with them on, playing Doom in 3D.  You turned your head to control your movement.</p><p>It was pretty cool seeing Doom in 3D projected in the room in front of me.</p><p>So how is this new technology?  What's new about it?  That this version is not 3D?  That the resolution is 800 wide and not 320 pixels wide?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A girl I knew over 10 years a go had a 3D set of these hooked to her computer .
I walked around her house during a party with them on , playing Doom in 3D .
You turned your head to control your movement.It was pretty cool seeing Doom in 3D projected in the room in front of me.So how is this new technology ?
What 's new about it ?
That this version is not 3D ?
That the resolution is 800 wide and not 320 pixels wide ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A girl I knew over 10 years a go had a 3D set of these hooked to her computer.
I walked around her house during a party with them on, playing Doom in 3D.
You turned your head to control your movement.It was pretty cool seeing Doom in 3D projected in the room in front of me.So how is this new technology?
What's new about it?
That this version is not 3D?
That the resolution is 800 wide and not 320 pixels wide?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878681</id>
	<title>lasers pointed at my retinas....</title>
	<author>CFD339</author>
	<datestamp>1256557980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what could go wrong?</p><p>I think I'll wait for version 2.1 on this particular tech.   First, because I don't want 800x600 on a 10cm screen a meter away.  That's not useful to me.   I want 1080p visible as a 52" 16x9 screen about 10 feet away.   NOW we're talking.</p><p>Aside from that, I think we'll wait and see just how much eye strain these things cause first -- and how well they travel.  COOL would be if they'd sit at the hinges of fully functional sunglasses so the display could be a heads-up while you do other things (maybe not driving).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what could go wrong ? I think I 'll wait for version 2.1 on this particular tech .
First , because I do n't want 800x600 on a 10cm screen a meter away .
That 's not useful to me .
I want 1080p visible as a 52 " 16x9 screen about 10 feet away .
NOW we 're talking.Aside from that , I think we 'll wait and see just how much eye strain these things cause first -- and how well they travel .
COOL would be if they 'd sit at the hinges of fully functional sunglasses so the display could be a heads-up while you do other things ( maybe not driving ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what could go wrong?I think I'll wait for version 2.1 on this particular tech.
First, because I don't want 800x600 on a 10cm screen a meter away.
That's not useful to me.
I want 1080p visible as a 52" 16x9 screen about 10 feet away.
NOW we're talking.Aside from that, I think we'll wait and see just how much eye strain these things cause first -- and how well they travel.
COOL would be if they'd sit at the hinges of fully functional sunglasses so the display could be a heads-up while you do other things (maybe not driving).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29884149</id>
	<title>Re:A Little Bit Backwards?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256659920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You owe me a new Keyboard!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You owe me a new Keyboard !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You owe me a new Keyboard!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877497</id>
	<title>Re:oblig</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256551920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>imagine the subtitles.....!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>imagine the subtitles..... !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>imagine the subtitles.....!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877449</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877689</id>
	<title>Re:A Little Bit Backwards?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256552760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>...a real-time translation device that would quite literally display subtitles as you talk to someone.</p></div><p>Wouldn't it make more sense to display subtitles as <i>someone</i> talks to <i>you</i>?</p></div><p>That depends. It could have a heuristics system to ensure that the next word coming out of your mouth doesn't get you in trouble:</p><p>Wife: How do these pants make my butt look?<br>Husband: It makes your butt look extremely HALT, FULL STOP. EXCEPTION ERROR. ALTERNATE VALUE very small, dear.</p><p>Boss: So, Peter, what do you think about my proposal for extended work hours with no overtime?<br>Peter: I think you are a fu-HALT, FULL STOP. EXCEPTION ERROR. ALTERNATE VALUE -n person and a brilliant leader!</p><p>Son: Hey dad, what's an erection?<br>Dad: Well, you see, it's when a man HALT, FULL STOP. EXCEPTION ERROR. ALTERNATE VALUE asks your mother.</p><p>Oh the applications.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...a real-time translation device that would quite literally display subtitles as you talk to someone.Would n't it make more sense to display subtitles as someone talks to you ? That depends .
It could have a heuristics system to ensure that the next word coming out of your mouth does n't get you in trouble : Wife : How do these pants make my butt look ? Husband : It makes your butt look extremely HALT , FULL STOP .
EXCEPTION ERROR .
ALTERNATE VALUE very small , dear.Boss : So , Peter , what do you think about my proposal for extended work hours with no overtime ? Peter : I think you are a fu-HALT , FULL STOP .
EXCEPTION ERROR .
ALTERNATE VALUE -n person and a brilliant leader ! Son : Hey dad , what 's an erection ? Dad : Well , you see , it 's when a man HALT , FULL STOP .
EXCEPTION ERROR .
ALTERNATE VALUE asks your mother.Oh the applications .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...a real-time translation device that would quite literally display subtitles as you talk to someone.Wouldn't it make more sense to display subtitles as someone talks to you?That depends.
It could have a heuristics system to ensure that the next word coming out of your mouth doesn't get you in trouble:Wife: How do these pants make my butt look?Husband: It makes your butt look extremely HALT, FULL STOP.
EXCEPTION ERROR.
ALTERNATE VALUE very small, dear.Boss: So, Peter, what do you think about my proposal for extended work hours with no overtime?Peter: I think you are a fu-HALT, FULL STOP.
EXCEPTION ERROR.
ALTERNATE VALUE -n person and a brilliant leader!Son: Hey dad, what's an erection?Dad: Well, you see, it's when a man HALT, FULL STOP.
EXCEPTION ERROR.
ALTERNATE VALUE asks your mother.Oh the applications.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877455</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877505</id>
	<title>Khlarr</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256551980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am really looking forward to being blinded when these start malfunctioning.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am really looking forward to being blinded when these start malfunctioning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am really looking forward to being blinded when these start malfunctioning.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473</id>
	<title>Obligatory joke</title>
	<author>dgatwood</author>
	<datestamp>1256551860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do not look into goggles with remaining eye.</p><p>Seriously, though, does anybody else find the idea of projecting directly on the eye a little disturbing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do not look into goggles with remaining eye.Seriously , though , does anybody else find the idea of projecting directly on the eye a little disturbing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do not look into goggles with remaining eye.Seriously, though, does anybody else find the idea of projecting directly on the eye a little disturbing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877665</id>
	<title>Re:A Little Bit Backwards?</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1256552640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wouldn't it make more sense to display subtitles as <i>someone</i> talks to <i>you</i>?</p></div><p>I can't speak for others, but I've had enough foot-in-mouth moments that maybe seeing what <i>I</i> currently am saying might help on occasion.</p><p>And a 2 second lead time would be even better.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't it make more sense to display subtitles as someone talks to you ? I ca n't speak for others , but I 've had enough foot-in-mouth moments that maybe seeing what I currently am saying might help on occasion.And a 2 second lead time would be even better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't it make more sense to display subtitles as someone talks to you?I can't speak for others, but I've had enough foot-in-mouth moments that maybe seeing what I currently am saying might help on occasion.And a 2 second lead time would be even better.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877455</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29882057</id>
	<title>Re:A Little Bit Backwards?</title>
	<author>RivenAleem</author>
	<datestamp>1256644620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't that be awesome for deaf people?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't that be awesome for deaf people ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't that be awesome for deaf people?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877455</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881535</id>
	<title>Re:How big again?</title>
	<author>dugrrr</author>
	<datestamp>1256634900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not only that, but a small box hanging out that far would cause a tracking problem.  For instance, if you get flashbulb or sunspot burn in on the retina, when you 'try to acquire' this fixed image it will keep moving like it's your eyeball's private wild-goose chase.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only that , but a small box hanging out that far would cause a tracking problem .
For instance , if you get flashbulb or sunspot burn in on the retina , when you 'try to acquire ' this fixed image it will keep moving like it 's your eyeball 's private wild-goose chase .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only that, but a small box hanging out that far would cause a tracking problem.
For instance, if you get flashbulb or sunspot burn in on the retina, when you 'try to acquire' this fixed image it will keep moving like it's your eyeball's private wild-goose chase.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29883241</id>
	<title>Re:Too little too late</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1256655420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"iPhone or a similar device"</p><p>What's that word - ah, um, *thinks* ah, yes, <i>"phone"</i>!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" iPhone or a similar device " What 's that word - ah , um , * thinks * ah , yes , " phone " !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"iPhone or a similar device"What's that word - ah, um, *thinks* ah, yes, "phone"!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877695</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877719</id>
	<title>Invasion?</title>
	<author>CannonballHead</author>
	<datestamp>1256552820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is this "invasion" if you need to willingly <i>put on a special pair of goggles that enable it</i>?</p><p>It's sort of like calling someone accepting a gift at Christmas robbery or theft..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this " invasion " if you need to willingly put on a special pair of goggles that enable it ? It 's sort of like calling someone accepting a gift at Christmas robbery or theft. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this "invasion" if you need to willingly put on a special pair of goggles that enable it?It's sort of like calling someone accepting a gift at Christmas robbery or theft..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878671</id>
	<title>Re:oblig</title>
	<author>Beardo the Bearded</author>
	<datestamp>1256557860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine the burn-in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine the burn-in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine the burn-in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877497</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878775</id>
	<title>Re:Prototype in article doesn't seem very practica</title>
	<author>beatsme</author>
	<datestamp>1256558640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think it's less arduous than you think, considering that the projected image is slightly translucent - this means that there is still continuity between the two retinal inputs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's less arduous than you think , considering that the projected image is slightly translucent - this means that there is still continuity between the two retinal inputs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's less arduous than you think, considering that the projected image is slightly translucent - this means that there is still continuity between the two retinal inputs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877697</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877817</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory joke</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256553240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Definitely not. I've been dreaming of something like this since I was a child.<br>And I'm *so* waiting for neural implants as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Definitely not .
I 've been dreaming of something like this since I was a child.And I 'm * so * waiting for neural implants as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Definitely not.
I've been dreaming of something like this since I was a child.And I'm *so* waiting for neural implants as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29880809</id>
	<title>Re:Imagine this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256578680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean like, "They Live" in reverse?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean like , " They Live " in reverse ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean like, "They Live" in reverse?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877759</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878071</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory joke</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256554320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously, though, does anybody else find the idea of projecting directly on the eye a little disturbing?</p></div><p>Having been hit in the eye with a laser at a light show (flight path was supposed to terminate below where I was, but something went wrong), and lucky to escape without long term injury, I do.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , though , does anybody else find the idea of projecting directly on the eye a little disturbing ? Having been hit in the eye with a laser at a light show ( flight path was supposed to terminate below where I was , but something went wrong ) , and lucky to escape without long term injury , I do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, though, does anybody else find the idea of projecting directly on the eye a little disturbing?Having been hit in the eye with a laser at a light show (flight path was supposed to terminate below where I was, but something went wrong), and lucky to escape without long term injury, I do.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879169</id>
	<title>Re:Prototype in article doesn't seem very practica</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1256561220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; I mean the thing is right in front of one of your eyes.</p><p>The next step will be some tricky optics (no, I don't know how it will work) such that the light will be reflected off (or refracted out of) the glasses lenses and into the eye while still allowing you full vision through the lenses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I mean the thing is right in front of one of your eyes.The next step will be some tricky optics ( no , I do n't know how it will work ) such that the light will be reflected off ( or refracted out of ) the glasses lenses and into the eye while still allowing you full vision through the lenses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I mean the thing is right in front of one of your eyes.The next step will be some tricky optics (no, I don't know how it will work) such that the light will be reflected off (or refracted out of) the glasses lenses and into the eye while still allowing you full vision through the lenses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877697</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878193</id>
	<title>Re:First Person Shooters</title>
	<author>TooMuchToDo</author>
	<datestamp>1256554860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>like those eye test machines do</p></div><p>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autorefractor" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autorefractor</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>like those eye test machines do http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autorefractor [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>like those eye test machines do
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autorefractor [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877901</id>
	<title>ob</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1256553540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shouldn't it be retin<i>ae</i>?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't it be retinae ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't it be retinae?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881397</id>
	<title>Re:Not me</title>
	<author>u38cg</author>
	<datestamp>1256675400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it generally pretty easy to find nude pics of women you know?  Because if it is, man, I'm hanging out with the wrong crowd.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it generally pretty easy to find nude pics of women you know ?
Because if it is , man , I 'm hanging out with the wrong crowd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it generally pretty easy to find nude pics of women you know?
Because if it is, man, I'm hanging out with the wrong crowd.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878103</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879169
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877695
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29883241
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877449
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877497
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877539
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877967
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877781
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877629
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879719
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877629
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29883607
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879297
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878275
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878193
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877781
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881089
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878215
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29887077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877719
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879013
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879839
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877449
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29882057
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879377
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878195
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879327
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878775
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878053
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29880041
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879657
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29880335
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29880809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878291
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881061
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877835
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878437
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29880123
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877665
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877449
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878697
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878245
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879509
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29883987
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29884149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877719
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879393
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877817
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878531
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879571
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29891633
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877979
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877449
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879997
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878777
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1845253_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881397
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29880041
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877471
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877781
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881535
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881089
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877449
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877497
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878025
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879813
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879997
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877773
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877455
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877665
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29882057
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29887077
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878291
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877689
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29884149
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29891633
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29883987
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879297
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878777
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877835
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878437
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877799
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879087
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877967
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877719
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879393
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879013
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877715
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878193
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879657
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877517
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877979
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879509
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879327
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879007
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878531
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879571
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877877
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877695
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29883241
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877697
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879145
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881517
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879839
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881061
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878775
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879169
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878103
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881397
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877557
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878195
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878313
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877473
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877817
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877947
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29880123
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878071
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29880335
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877761
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878275
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878245
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878215
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877629
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29883607
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879719
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877759
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29880809
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29879377
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878499
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877769
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878697
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877539
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29881929
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878519
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29878053
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1845253.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1845253.29877609
</commentlist>
</conversation>
