<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_26_1834248</id>
	<title>Clean Smells Promote Ethical Behavior</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1256545440000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>A recent study is suggesting that <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091025091148.htm">moral behavior may be encouraged with nothing more than clean smells</a>.  The Brigham Young University professor found a "dramatic improvement in ethical behavior with just a few spritzes of citrus-scented Windex."  <i>"The researchers see implications for workplaces, retail stores and other organizations that have relied on traditional surveillance and security measures to enforce rules. Perhaps the findings could be applied at home, too, Liljenquist said with a smile. 'Could be that getting our kids to clean up their rooms might help them clean up their acts, too.'  The study titled "The Smell of Virtue" was unusually simple and conclusive. Participants engaged in several tasks, the only difference being that some worked in unscented rooms, while others worked in rooms freshly spritzed with Windex."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>A recent study is suggesting that moral behavior may be encouraged with nothing more than clean smells .
The Brigham Young University professor found a " dramatic improvement in ethical behavior with just a few spritzes of citrus-scented Windex .
" " The researchers see implications for workplaces , retail stores and other organizations that have relied on traditional surveillance and security measures to enforce rules .
Perhaps the findings could be applied at home , too , Liljenquist said with a smile .
'Could be that getting our kids to clean up their rooms might help them clean up their acts , too .
' The study titled " The Smell of Virtue " was unusually simple and conclusive .
Participants engaged in several tasks , the only difference being that some worked in unscented rooms , while others worked in rooms freshly spritzed with Windex .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A recent study is suggesting that moral behavior may be encouraged with nothing more than clean smells.
The Brigham Young University professor found a "dramatic improvement in ethical behavior with just a few spritzes of citrus-scented Windex.
"  "The researchers see implications for workplaces, retail stores and other organizations that have relied on traditional surveillance and security measures to enforce rules.
Perhaps the findings could be applied at home, too, Liljenquist said with a smile.
'Could be that getting our kids to clean up their rooms might help them clean up their acts, too.
'  The study titled "The Smell of Virtue" was unusually simple and conclusive.
Participants engaged in several tasks, the only difference being that some worked in unscented rooms, while others worked in rooms freshly spritzed with Windex.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880585</id>
	<title>This study was funded by ...</title>
	<author>Organic Brain Damage</author>
	<datestamp>1256575560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>SC Johnson.</htmltext>
<tokenext>SC Johnson .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SC Johnson.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882165</id>
	<title>Re:Happiness</title>
	<author>Teckla</author>
	<datestamp>1256646780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't know about any of you, but being in a smelly, disgusting store makes me unhappy.</p></div><p>Yeah, I don't like Walmart either...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about any of you , but being in a smelly , disgusting store makes me unhappy.Yeah , I do n't like Walmart either.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about any of you, but being in a smelly, disgusting store makes me unhappy.Yeah, I don't like Walmart either...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879357</id>
	<title>Re:But...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256562600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Despite possibly going offtopic, I didn't realize Mill's model for utilitarianism was still considered a viable ethical school.  It is definitely a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy\_of\_the\_broken\_window" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">fallacy of the broken window</a> [wikipedia.org]; the insurance company winds up footing the bill, which means the stockholders and general insurance subscribers are suffering ill-effect.  Then again, the whole Cash for Clunkers debaucle was considered to be a wildly successful "incentive to promote ethics" despite the absolute destruction of overall wealth.  If I believed in mandating things, I should think I'd believe in mandating everyone take at least 6 hours of ethics/philosophy classes before being allowed to enter the workforce.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Despite possibly going offtopic , I did n't realize Mill 's model for utilitarianism was still considered a viable ethical school .
It is definitely a fallacy of the broken window [ wikipedia.org ] ; the insurance company winds up footing the bill , which means the stockholders and general insurance subscribers are suffering ill-effect .
Then again , the whole Cash for Clunkers debaucle was considered to be a wildly successful " incentive to promote ethics " despite the absolute destruction of overall wealth .
If I believed in mandating things , I should think I 'd believe in mandating everyone take at least 6 hours of ethics/philosophy classes before being allowed to enter the workforce .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Despite possibly going offtopic, I didn't realize Mill's model for utilitarianism was still considered a viable ethical school.
It is definitely a fallacy of the broken window [wikipedia.org]; the insurance company winds up footing the bill, which means the stockholders and general insurance subscribers are suffering ill-effect.
Then again, the whole Cash for Clunkers debaucle was considered to be a wildly successful "incentive to promote ethics" despite the absolute destruction of overall wealth.
If I believed in mandating things, I should think I'd believe in mandating everyone take at least 6 hours of ethics/philosophy classes before being allowed to enter the workforce.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878327</id>
	<title>Re:Happiness</title>
	<author>eaglegrl1</author>
	<datestamp>1256555520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree. And if I'm in a bad mood then I am more likely to misbehave.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
And if I 'm in a bad mood then I am more likely to misbehave .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
And if I'm in a bad mood then I am more likely to misbehave.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877391</id>
	<title>Re:junk science</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256551440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're wrong.  I design experiments for a living.  A control group is roughly defined as "A sample in which a factor whose effect is being estimated is absent or is held constant, in order to provide a comparison."  We are estimating the effect of clean smelling room vs. unscented room on ethical behavior.  This is a control group, and you are the charlatan.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're wrong .
I design experiments for a living .
A control group is roughly defined as " A sample in which a factor whose effect is being estimated is absent or is held constant , in order to provide a comparison .
" We are estimating the effect of clean smelling room vs. unscented room on ethical behavior .
This is a control group , and you are the charlatan .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're wrong.
I design experiments for a living.
A control group is roughly defined as "A sample in which a factor whose effect is being estimated is absent or is held constant, in order to provide a comparison.
"  We are estimating the effect of clean smelling room vs. unscented room on ethical behavior.
This is a control group, and you are the charlatan.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877037</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878393</id>
	<title>Isopropanol versus 'Clean smell'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256555940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Contents of Windex:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Isopropanol<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * 2-Butoxyethanol<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Ethylene glycol n-hexyl ether<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Water<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Ammonia</p><p>But apparently, no, it's the "clean smell" that does it. (Ignoring the possibility  we are only socialised to associate things like Isopropanol and Ammonia with "clean")</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Contents of Windex :         * Isopropanol         * 2-Butoxyethanol         * Ethylene glycol n-hexyl ether         * Water         * AmmoniaBut apparently , no , it 's the " clean smell " that does it .
( Ignoring the possibility we are only socialised to associate things like Isopropanol and Ammonia with " clean " )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Contents of Windex:
        * Isopropanol
        * 2-Butoxyethanol
        * Ethylene glycol n-hexyl ether
        * Water
        * AmmoniaBut apparently, no, it's the "clean smell" that does it.
(Ignoring the possibility  we are only socialised to associate things like Isopropanol and Ammonia with "clean")</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877401</id>
	<title>My Fat Greek product placement</title>
	<author>StillNeedMoreCoffee</author>
	<datestamp>1256551560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who funded this study again?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who funded this study again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who funded this study again?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877771</id>
	<title>Re:junk science</title>
	<author>amplt1337</author>
	<datestamp>1256553060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to mention that, this being BYU, they probably have some serious selection bias going on in terms of study participants.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention that , this being BYU , they probably have some serious selection bias going on in terms of study participants .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention that, this being BYU, they probably have some serious selection bias going on in terms of study participants.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877037</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878145</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>apoc.famine</author>
	<datestamp>1256554620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've spent a little time around a moose that had just died. It didn't smell bad at all. In fact, once a tenderloin was sizzling up with some mushrooms and onions, garlic and seasoning, it smelled pretty damn good. <br>
&nbsp; <br>Now, if you are talking about a place that smelled like a moose died in it last month, then I'm with you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've spent a little time around a moose that had just died .
It did n't smell bad at all .
In fact , once a tenderloin was sizzling up with some mushrooms and onions , garlic and seasoning , it smelled pretty damn good .
  Now , if you are talking about a place that smelled like a moose died in it last month , then I 'm with you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've spent a little time around a moose that had just died.
It didn't smell bad at all.
In fact, once a tenderloin was sizzling up with some mushrooms and onions, garlic and seasoning, it smelled pretty damn good.
  Now, if you are talking about a place that smelled like a moose died in it last month, then I'm with you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877095</id>
	<title>RTFA!</title>
	<author>spun</author>
	<datestamp>1256550360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You just need to spritz her with some Windex and all immoral thoughts will disappear.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You just need to spritz her with some Windex and all immoral thoughts will disappear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You just need to spritz her with some Windex and all immoral thoughts will disappear.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876837</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878051</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>ksheff</author>
	<datestamp>1256554200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If a place smells like a moose just died in it</p></div></blockquote><p>
I've been told that's what my cubicle is like a few hours after a lunch with beans and/or cabbage.  It's one way to keep people away from asking me annoying questions.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If a place smells like a moose just died in it I 've been told that 's what my cubicle is like a few hours after a lunch with beans and/or cabbage .
It 's one way to keep people away from asking me annoying questions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a place smells like a moose just died in it
I've been told that's what my cubicle is like a few hours after a lunch with beans and/or cabbage.
It's one way to keep people away from asking me annoying questions.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880175</id>
	<title>Re:Fish smells like yo mama is horny again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256570220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The copper wiring one was clever, for a racist joke.  The rest were lame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The copper wiring one was clever , for a racist joke .
The rest were lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The copper wiring one was clever, for a racist joke.
The rest were lame.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876881</id>
	<title>I love the smell...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256549520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I love the smell of Windex in the morning... The smell, you know that fresh smell... Smells like, virtue.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I love the smell of Windex in the morning... The smell , you know that fresh smell... Smells like , virtue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love the smell of Windex in the morning... The smell, you know that fresh smell... Smells like, virtue.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877735</id>
	<title>Sounds like Wall Street...</title>
	<author>Muckluck</author>
	<datestamp>1256552880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like wall street could use a few hundred cases of Windex.  Straighten out them bankers once and fer all...  On second thought, Washington DC, all state capitals and local governments need a few cases as well.  This is what happens when Aunt Bea isn't around to clean the courthouse / jail daily.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like wall street could use a few hundred cases of Windex .
Straighten out them bankers once and fer all... On second thought , Washington DC , all state capitals and local governments need a few cases as well .
This is what happens when Aunt Bea is n't around to clean the courthouse / jail daily .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like wall street could use a few hundred cases of Windex.
Straighten out them bankers once and fer all...  On second thought, Washington DC, all state capitals and local governments need a few cases as well.
This is what happens when Aunt Bea isn't around to clean the courthouse / jail daily.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876837</id>
	<title>This is BS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256549340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I call bs...whenever an attractive woman walks by smelling like she just stepped out of the shower I have only immoral thoughts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I call bs...whenever an attractive woman walks by smelling like she just stepped out of the shower I have only immoral thoughts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call bs...whenever an attractive woman walks by smelling like she just stepped out of the shower I have only immoral thoughts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878663</id>
	<title>heh</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1256557860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*Frrppbptbtbptbpt!*</p><p>Flame on!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* Frrppbptbtbptbpt !
* Flame on !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*Frrppbptbtbptbpt!
*Flame on!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877113</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256550420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If a place smells like a moose just died in it, especially if its also visibly dirty, then I just sort of get the impression that it doesn't actually matter what I do in there.  On the other hand, when a place is spotless, smells lemony fresh and everything appears in order then I'm not going to be the one to put my feet on the coffee table, no matter how tempting it might be.  Smell ties into taste and is one of the more powerful senses we have, so it makes sense that it would play a large part in determining our impression of what is or isn't acceptable in a given location, every bit as much as it tells us what foods seem OK to eat.</p></div><p>But the interesting part about this study is that it wasn't measuring behaviour that would typically be linked to cleanliness (ie. putting your feet on the coffee table). It was looking into behaviour that should be consistent regardless what room you're in.</p><p>For example, people sitting in the "clean" room were more willing to volunteer for Habitat for Humanity. They were also more willing to donate money to the cause.</p><p>Also interesting is that participants didn't actually consciously notice the sent in the room.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If a place smells like a moose just died in it , especially if its also visibly dirty , then I just sort of get the impression that it does n't actually matter what I do in there .
On the other hand , when a place is spotless , smells lemony fresh and everything appears in order then I 'm not going to be the one to put my feet on the coffee table , no matter how tempting it might be .
Smell ties into taste and is one of the more powerful senses we have , so it makes sense that it would play a large part in determining our impression of what is or is n't acceptable in a given location , every bit as much as it tells us what foods seem OK to eat.But the interesting part about this study is that it was n't measuring behaviour that would typically be linked to cleanliness ( ie .
putting your feet on the coffee table ) .
It was looking into behaviour that should be consistent regardless what room you 're in.For example , people sitting in the " clean " room were more willing to volunteer for Habitat for Humanity .
They were also more willing to donate money to the cause.Also interesting is that participants did n't actually consciously notice the sent in the room .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a place smells like a moose just died in it, especially if its also visibly dirty, then I just sort of get the impression that it doesn't actually matter what I do in there.
On the other hand, when a place is spotless, smells lemony fresh and everything appears in order then I'm not going to be the one to put my feet on the coffee table, no matter how tempting it might be.
Smell ties into taste and is one of the more powerful senses we have, so it makes sense that it would play a large part in determining our impression of what is or isn't acceptable in a given location, every bit as much as it tells us what foods seem OK to eat.But the interesting part about this study is that it wasn't measuring behaviour that would typically be linked to cleanliness (ie.
putting your feet on the coffee table).
It was looking into behaviour that should be consistent regardless what room you're in.For example, people sitting in the "clean" room were more willing to volunteer for Habitat for Humanity.
They were also more willing to donate money to the cause.Also interesting is that participants didn't actually consciously notice the sent in the room.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878345</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>ignavus</author>
	<datestamp>1256555640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If a place smells like a moose just died in it,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>Canadians feel at home?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If a place smells like a moose just died in it , ...Canadians feel at home ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a place smells like a moose just died in it, ...Canadians feel at home?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877229</id>
	<title>BYU article</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256550840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; http://news.byu.edu/archive09-Oct-smellofvirtue.aspx - original article with a video</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>            http : //news.byu.edu/archive09-Oct-smellofvirtue.aspx - original article with a video</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
            http://news.byu.edu/archive09-Oct-smellofvirtue.aspx - original article with a video</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878099</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>ELitwin</author>
	<datestamp>1256554440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Smell is just tasting from a distance. (Think about that the next time your in a public bathroom and the guy next to you forgets the courtesy flush.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Smell is just tasting from a distance .
( Think about that the next time your in a public bathroom and the guy next to you forgets the courtesy flush .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Smell is just tasting from a distance.
(Think about that the next time your in a public bathroom and the guy next to you forgets the courtesy flush.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29887313</id>
	<title>Re:Crappy experiment</title>
	<author>Mab\_Mass</author>
	<datestamp>1256673540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> And even if they managed to control all of the points you asked about, the only thing they would have shown is that <i>citrus windex</i> has this effect.

</p><p> The leap from citrus windex to anything that has a "clean smell" is way too far of a leap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And even if they managed to control all of the points you asked about , the only thing they would have shown is that citrus windex has this effect .
The leap from citrus windex to anything that has a " clean smell " is way too far of a leap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> And even if they managed to control all of the points you asked about, the only thing they would have shown is that citrus windex has this effect.
The leap from citrus windex to anything that has a "clean smell" is way too far of a leap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877545</id>
	<title>Re:Crappy experiment</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256552160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It's crappy experiments like this that <b>give pseudo-science a bad name</b>.</p></div></blockquote><p>Not only did you type that fantastically stupid sentence without thinking about what it meant, you did it <i>twice</i>.</p><p>And no, you weren't joking, being ironic, or saying that it's so bad that even "regular" pseudo-science looks bad in comparison.  You really meant the literal interpretation of what you said.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's crappy experiments like this that give pseudo-science a bad name.Not only did you type that fantastically stupid sentence without thinking about what it meant , you did it twice.And no , you were n't joking , being ironic , or saying that it 's so bad that even " regular " pseudo-science looks bad in comparison .
You really meant the literal interpretation of what you said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's crappy experiments like this that give pseudo-science a bad name.Not only did you type that fantastically stupid sentence without thinking about what it meant, you did it twice.And no, you weren't joking, being ironic, or saying that it's so bad that even "regular" pseudo-science looks bad in comparison.
You really meant the literal interpretation of what you said.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878309</id>
	<title>Needs more research</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1256555400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I propose a grant for a study to determine what scents make Professor Liljenquist more likely to put out...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I propose a grant for a study to determine what scents make Professor Liljenquist more likely to put out.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I propose a grant for a study to determine what scents make Professor Liljenquist more likely to put out...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879405</id>
	<title>Capitol Hill</title>
	<author>db32</author>
	<datestamp>1256562960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how much Windex would be required to encourage ethical behavior on Capitol Hill...</p><p>I wonder if that much Windex is hazardous to be around...</p><p>I wonder how many people care if it is dangerous to the congress critters...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how much Windex would be required to encourage ethical behavior on Capitol Hill...I wonder if that much Windex is hazardous to be around...I wonder how many people care if it is dangerous to the congress critters.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how much Windex would be required to encourage ethical behavior on Capitol Hill...I wonder if that much Windex is hazardous to be around...I wonder how many people care if it is dangerous to the congress critters...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879507</id>
	<title>Re:Crappy experiment</title>
	<author>Whiteox</author>
	<datestamp>1256563740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It has more to do with <i>marking territory</i> than resources.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It has more to do with marking territory than resources .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has more to do with marking territory than resources.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877051</id>
	<title>Is this a joke?</title>
	<author>swanzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1256550180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Morality...Product placement...<p><div class="quote"><p>The study titled "The Smell of Virtue" was unusually simple and conclusive. Participants engaged in several tasks, the only difference being that some worked in unscented rooms, while others worked in rooms freshly spritzed with Windex</p></div><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...top-notch scientists...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Katie Liljenquist, assistant professor of organizational leadership at BYU's Marriott School of Management, is the lead author on the piece in a forthcoming issue of Psychological Science.</p></div><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...looks to a win/win situation for both SC Johnson and the LDS.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Morality...Product placement...The study titled " The Smell of Virtue " was unusually simple and conclusive .
Participants engaged in several tasks , the only difference being that some worked in unscented rooms , while others worked in rooms freshly spritzed with Windex ...top-notch scientists...Katie Liljenquist , assistant professor of organizational leadership at BYU 's Marriott School of Management , is the lead author on the piece in a forthcoming issue of Psychological Science .
...looks to a win/win situation for both SC Johnson and the LDS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Morality...Product placement...The study titled "The Smell of Virtue" was unusually simple and conclusive.
Participants engaged in several tasks, the only difference being that some worked in unscented rooms, while others worked in rooms freshly spritzed with Windex ...top-notch scientists...Katie Liljenquist, assistant professor of organizational leadership at BYU's Marriott School of Management, is the lead author on the piece in a forthcoming issue of Psychological Science.
...looks to a win/win situation for both SC Johnson and the LDS.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877777</id>
	<title>Re:junk science</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256553060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>And a demonstration that an attractive woman can get money and resources from a major university to run a useless study.</p></div></blockquote><p>How would you describe the scent of the room you're in right now? My guess: bitter.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And a demonstration that an attractive woman can get money and resources from a major university to run a useless study.How would you describe the scent of the room you 're in right now ?
My guess : bitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And a demonstration that an attractive woman can get money and resources from a major university to run a useless study.How would you describe the scent of the room you're in right now?
My guess: bitter.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877037</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878295</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256555340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... that explains plumbers, then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... that explains plumbers , then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... that explains plumbers, then.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29885089</id>
	<title>Re:Crappy experiment</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256664240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This experiment could be seen as validating a study from last year, showing that people are <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16096-graffiti-and-litter-lead-to-more-street-crime.html" title="newscientist.com" rel="nofollow">more likely to behave lawfully in an environment with less litter and graffiti</a> [newscientist.com].  The result is in line with the "broken window" theory -- that people get cues from their environment when deciding what behavior is socially acceptable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This experiment could be seen as validating a study from last year , showing that people are more likely to behave lawfully in an environment with less litter and graffiti [ newscientist.com ] .
The result is in line with the " broken window " theory -- that people get cues from their environment when deciding what behavior is socially acceptable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This experiment could be seen as validating a study from last year, showing that people are more likely to behave lawfully in an environment with less litter and graffiti [newscientist.com].
The result is in line with the "broken window" theory -- that people get cues from their environment when deciding what behavior is socially acceptable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876785</id>
	<title>How small is it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256549220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Rob Malda's penis is so small that a tootsie roll is both longer and wider than his own penis.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rob Malda 's penis is so small that a tootsie roll is both longer and wider than his own penis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rob Malda's penis is so small that a tootsie roll is both longer and wider than his own penis.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876863</id>
	<title>this is why</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256549520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I never trusted the poop smith.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I never trusted the poop smith .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never trusted the poop smith.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882151</id>
	<title>Re:But...</title>
	<author>daem0n1x</author>
	<datestamp>1256646480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
There's a Portuguese saying that goes like this:
</p><p>
Ladr&atilde;o que rouba ladr&atilde;o tem 100 anos de perd&atilde;o.
</p><p>
A thief who robs a thief has pardon for 100 years.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a Portuguese saying that goes like this : Ladr   o que rouba ladr   o tem 100 anos de perd   o .
A thief who robs a thief has pardon for 100 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
There's a Portuguese saying that goes like this:

Ladrão que rouba ladrão tem 100 anos de perdão.
A thief who robs a thief has pardon for 100 years.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878989</id>
	<title>Less is more</title>
	<author>Have Brain Will Rent</author>
	<datestamp>1256560020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does <b>everything</b> have to be frickin scented? Crap, it seems like every frickin product around has got to have a scent. And there are waaayyyyyy too many people who have no familiarity with the idea of "less is more"... now we have to have scents to promote ethical behavior? Just get people to take showers and lay off all the perfumed crap. Sheeeesh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does everything have to be frickin scented ?
Crap , it seems like every frickin product around has got to have a scent .
And there are waaayyyyyy too many people who have no familiarity with the idea of " less is more " ... now we have to have scents to promote ethical behavior ?
Just get people to take showers and lay off all the perfumed crap .
Sheeeesh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does everything have to be frickin scented?
Crap, it seems like every frickin product around has got to have a scent.
And there are waaayyyyyy too many people who have no familiarity with the idea of "less is more"... now we have to have scents to promote ethical behavior?
Just get people to take showers and lay off all the perfumed crap.
Sheeeesh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29883483</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>that IT girl</author>
	<datestamp>1256656680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>True. Subconsciously we are probably making the association that if a place is clean, obviously someone was doing the cleaning. Someone who cares about and probably watches over the place, just like a mother might do who keeps her house clean and is diligent in keeping her children in line. This mental association is likely to stick with us. It does make sense that one could get away with something underhanded more in a dirty, untended place than somewhere clean.</htmltext>
<tokenext>True .
Subconsciously we are probably making the association that if a place is clean , obviously someone was doing the cleaning .
Someone who cares about and probably watches over the place , just like a mother might do who keeps her house clean and is diligent in keeping her children in line .
This mental association is likely to stick with us .
It does make sense that one could get away with something underhanded more in a dirty , untended place than somewhere clean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True.
Subconsciously we are probably making the association that if a place is clean, obviously someone was doing the cleaning.
Someone who cares about and probably watches over the place, just like a mother might do who keeps her house clean and is diligent in keeping her children in line.
This mental association is likely to stick with us.
It does make sense that one could get away with something underhanded more in a dirty, untended place than somewhere clean.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29883415</id>
	<title>Re:RTFA!</title>
	<author>macintyred</author>
	<datestamp>1256656320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe tmosley was referring to what the woman would spray back, not what others should spray on her.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe tmosley was referring to what the woman would spray back , not what others should spray on her .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe tmosley was referring to what the woman would spray back, not what others should spray on her.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879907</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880845</id>
	<title>Re:But...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256579040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The utilitarianism model is bunk in the sense you can't know what it would say, because that model requires you to be able to not only quantify happiness, but to also see all possible outcomes and quantify happiness there (and what happens if there is significant unhappiness currently that later turns into more happiness?).</p><p>One could equally argue that if the ethical model really did encourage bank robbing, then everyone would rob banks.  Thus, the insurance companies would quickly lose money/stop insuring banks.  Banks could no longer be in business and thus close.  All this job loss and inability to provide debt would quickly destroy the economy and lead to severe depression.  Thus the long term effect, if utilitarianism were to suggest bank robbing is good, would be negative, thus by its own logical rules, it must suggest that bank robbing is unethical.</p><p>More importantly, you're assuming that the "trickle-down" impact of bank robbing will positively affect the economy which is a humongous assumption.  You are assuming:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; 1. The bank robbers can better distribute wealth than the bank/insurance company<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; 2. The bank robbers will indeed actually spend their loot (remember - spending lots of money after a bank robbery is the quickest way to get arrested)<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; 3. Trickle down economics is a proven theory<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; 4. You are ignoring that this isn't even trickle-down economics in this case; you are re-distributing wealth, not generating it.</p><p>Paraphrasing my philosophy teacher: they all get a lot of things right and a lot of things wrong.  If you take the overlap of what each theory would recommend, you are more likely to be right than wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The utilitarianism model is bunk in the sense you ca n't know what it would say , because that model requires you to be able to not only quantify happiness , but to also see all possible outcomes and quantify happiness there ( and what happens if there is significant unhappiness currently that later turns into more happiness ?
) .One could equally argue that if the ethical model really did encourage bank robbing , then everyone would rob banks .
Thus , the insurance companies would quickly lose money/stop insuring banks .
Banks could no longer be in business and thus close .
All this job loss and inability to provide debt would quickly destroy the economy and lead to severe depression .
Thus the long term effect , if utilitarianism were to suggest bank robbing is good , would be negative , thus by its own logical rules , it must suggest that bank robbing is unethical.More importantly , you 're assuming that the " trickle-down " impact of bank robbing will positively affect the economy which is a humongous assumption .
You are assuming :     1 .
The bank robbers can better distribute wealth than the bank/insurance company     2 .
The bank robbers will indeed actually spend their loot ( remember - spending lots of money after a bank robbery is the quickest way to get arrested )     3 .
Trickle down economics is a proven theory     4 .
You are ignoring that this is n't even trickle-down economics in this case ; you are re-distributing wealth , not generating it.Paraphrasing my philosophy teacher : they all get a lot of things right and a lot of things wrong .
If you take the overlap of what each theory would recommend , you are more likely to be right than wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The utilitarianism model is bunk in the sense you can't know what it would say, because that model requires you to be able to not only quantify happiness, but to also see all possible outcomes and quantify happiness there (and what happens if there is significant unhappiness currently that later turns into more happiness?
).One could equally argue that if the ethical model really did encourage bank robbing, then everyone would rob banks.
Thus, the insurance companies would quickly lose money/stop insuring banks.
Banks could no longer be in business and thus close.
All this job loss and inability to provide debt would quickly destroy the economy and lead to severe depression.
Thus the long term effect, if utilitarianism were to suggest bank robbing is good, would be negative, thus by its own logical rules, it must suggest that bank robbing is unethical.More importantly, you're assuming that the "trickle-down" impact of bank robbing will positively affect the economy which is a humongous assumption.
You are assuming:
    1.
The bank robbers can better distribute wealth than the bank/insurance company
    2.
The bank robbers will indeed actually spend their loot (remember - spending lots of money after a bank robbery is the quickest way to get arrested)
    3.
Trickle down economics is a proven theory
    4.
You are ignoring that this isn't even trickle-down economics in this case; you are re-distributing wealth, not generating it.Paraphrasing my philosophy teacher: they all get a lot of things right and a lot of things wrong.
If you take the overlap of what each theory would recommend, you are more likely to be right than wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881621</id>
	<title>Re:RTFA!</title>
	<author>Fred\_A</author>
	<datestamp>1256636580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Boiling water and rocks have also been used</p></div><p>But they don't really smell of anything... Religious people really make no sense at all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Boiling water and rocks have also been usedBut they do n't really smell of anything... Religious people really make no sense at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boiling water and rocks have also been usedBut they don't really smell of anything... Religious people really make no sense at all.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879907</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876961</id>
	<title>Ammonia, Detergents or Scents?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256549820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which is it that did it? This appears to measure the effect of Windex, not scents. Great publicity for Windex though. I'm appalled at what passes for science these days. The public knows no better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is it that did it ?
This appears to measure the effect of Windex , not scents .
Great publicity for Windex though .
I 'm appalled at what passes for science these days .
The public knows no better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which is it that did it?
This appears to measure the effect of Windex, not scents.
Great publicity for Windex though.
I'm appalled at what passes for science these days.
The public knows no better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877129</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>causality</author>
	<datestamp>1256550420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If a place smells like a moose just died in it, especially if its also visibly dirty, then I just sort of get the impression that it doesn't actually matter what I do in there.  On the other hand, when a place is spotless, smells lemony fresh and everything appears in order then I'm not going to be the one to put my feet on the coffee table, no matter how tempting it might be.  Smell ties into taste and is one of the more powerful senses we have, so it makes sense that it would play a large part in determining our impression of what is or isn't acceptable in a given location, every bit as much as it tells us what foods seem OK to eat.</p></div><p>You certainly do have a point, though I question the merits of a study like this one.  If scent made such a noticable difference, then you can safely say that these folks were not terribly committed to doing the Right Thing.  They needed an external motivation.  That's hardly as good as doing the best you can, all the time, because you seriously believe in and want to adhere to sound, timeless principles that have a solid ethical or moral foundation.
<br> <br>
For that reason, I take this to be further evidence that most people operate on a sort of auto-pilot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If a place smells like a moose just died in it , especially if its also visibly dirty , then I just sort of get the impression that it does n't actually matter what I do in there .
On the other hand , when a place is spotless , smells lemony fresh and everything appears in order then I 'm not going to be the one to put my feet on the coffee table , no matter how tempting it might be .
Smell ties into taste and is one of the more powerful senses we have , so it makes sense that it would play a large part in determining our impression of what is or is n't acceptable in a given location , every bit as much as it tells us what foods seem OK to eat.You certainly do have a point , though I question the merits of a study like this one .
If scent made such a noticable difference , then you can safely say that these folks were not terribly committed to doing the Right Thing .
They needed an external motivation .
That 's hardly as good as doing the best you can , all the time , because you seriously believe in and want to adhere to sound , timeless principles that have a solid ethical or moral foundation .
For that reason , I take this to be further evidence that most people operate on a sort of auto-pilot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a place smells like a moose just died in it, especially if its also visibly dirty, then I just sort of get the impression that it doesn't actually matter what I do in there.
On the other hand, when a place is spotless, smells lemony fresh and everything appears in order then I'm not going to be the one to put my feet on the coffee table, no matter how tempting it might be.
Smell ties into taste and is one of the more powerful senses we have, so it makes sense that it would play a large part in determining our impression of what is or isn't acceptable in a given location, every bit as much as it tells us what foods seem OK to eat.You certainly do have a point, though I question the merits of a study like this one.
If scent made such a noticable difference, then you can safely say that these folks were not terribly committed to doing the Right Thing.
They needed an external motivation.
That's hardly as good as doing the best you can, all the time, because you seriously believe in and want to adhere to sound, timeless principles that have a solid ethical or moral foundation.
For that reason, I take this to be further evidence that most people operate on a sort of auto-pilot.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877013</id>
	<title>If that is the case...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256550000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...I wonder what the Capitol Building must smell like?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...I wonder what the Capitol Building must smell like ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I wonder what the Capitol Building must smell like?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878167</id>
	<title>Subjects</title>
	<author>Nidi62</author>
	<datestamp>1256554680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I dont see this as valid, unless they had each group tested in both a scented and unscented room.  It could be just as likely that they had people more willing to give in the scented room than in the other, with the scent having no real effect.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I dont see this as valid , unless they had each group tested in both a scented and unscented room .
It could be just as likely that they had people more willing to give in the scented room than in the other , with the scent having no real effect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dont see this as valid, unless they had each group tested in both a scented and unscented room.
It could be just as likely that they had people more willing to give in the scented room than in the other, with the scent having no real effect.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880215</id>
	<title>or gloryholes?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256570820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they mop those out frequently with a bleach solution.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...ever notice that stale semen smells like chlorox?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they mop those out frequently with a bleach solution .
...ever notice that stale semen smells like chlorox ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they mop those out frequently with a bleach solution.
...ever notice that stale semen smells like chlorox?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877677</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877037</id>
	<title>junk science</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256550120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's no link to the original study, but it was clear from the article that there was no control group. They had a scented room vs. an unscented room, when what they should have had was a "pleasantly" scented room vs. an "unpleasantly" scented room with a third, unscented room as the control.  Then they should have done some feedback questionnaires at the conclusion, in which they could have buried a question or two regarding the participant's scent preferences to see how well the participants' evaluation of the smell of the rooms lined-up with the premise of the study.
<br> <br>
This study was actually just a subset of the premise that happy people are more likely to be grateful and donate their time and/or money than unhappy people, and that environmental factors can influence a person's relative happiness. And a demonstration that an attractive woman can get money and resources from a major university to run a useless study.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's no link to the original study , but it was clear from the article that there was no control group .
They had a scented room vs. an unscented room , when what they should have had was a " pleasantly " scented room vs. an " unpleasantly " scented room with a third , unscented room as the control .
Then they should have done some feedback questionnaires at the conclusion , in which they could have buried a question or two regarding the participant 's scent preferences to see how well the participants ' evaluation of the smell of the rooms lined-up with the premise of the study .
This study was actually just a subset of the premise that happy people are more likely to be grateful and donate their time and/or money than unhappy people , and that environmental factors can influence a person 's relative happiness .
And a demonstration that an attractive woman can get money and resources from a major university to run a useless study .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's no link to the original study, but it was clear from the article that there was no control group.
They had a scented room vs. an unscented room, when what they should have had was a "pleasantly" scented room vs. an "unpleasantly" scented room with a third, unscented room as the control.
Then they should have done some feedback questionnaires at the conclusion, in which they could have buried a question or two regarding the participant's scent preferences to see how well the participants' evaluation of the smell of the rooms lined-up with the premise of the study.
This study was actually just a subset of the premise that happy people are more likely to be grateful and donate their time and/or money than unhappy people, and that environmental factors can influence a person's relative happiness.
And a demonstration that an attractive woman can get money and resources from a major university to run a useless study.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877883</id>
	<title>From BYU?</title>
	<author>jonnat</author>
	<datestamp>1256553420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>A Brigham Young University professor suggesting a possible biochemical link to ethical behavior. Sounds like a letter of resignation to me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A Brigham Young University professor suggesting a possible biochemical link to ethical behavior .
Sounds like a letter of resignation to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A Brigham Young University professor suggesting a possible biochemical link to ethical behavior.
Sounds like a letter of resignation to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879837</id>
	<title>"Sorry, your honor.."</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256566620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Sorry, your honor - I farted, then I just don't know what came over me..."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Sorry , your honor - I farted , then I just do n't know what came over me... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Sorry, your honor - I farted, then I just don't know what came over me..."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880657</id>
	<title>Is this anything like the Pax?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256576640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There might be undesirable side effects.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There might be undesirable side effects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There might be undesirable side effects.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879473</id>
	<title>Re:But...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1256563440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have thought about robbing a bank more than once, have you? ^^</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Locke's rights-based ethics [...]</p></div><p>You don't mean <a href="http://encyclopediadramatica.com/John\_Locke" title="encycloped...matica.com"> <em>that</em> Locke</a> [encycloped...matica.com], do you?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You have thought about robbing a bank more than once , have you ?
^ ^ Locke 's rights-based ethics [ ... ] You do n't mean that Locke [ encycloped...matica.com ] , do you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have thought about robbing a bank more than once, have you?
^^Locke's rights-based ethics [...]You don't mean  that Locke [encycloped...matica.com], do you?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877225</id>
	<title>Re:If that is the case...</title>
	<author>mhajicek</author>
	<datestamp>1256550840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was going to ask what Washington must smell like.  Perhaps we should send the lawmakers each an air freshener.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was going to ask what Washington must smell like .
Perhaps we should send the lawmakers each an air freshener .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was going to ask what Washington must smell like.
Perhaps we should send the lawmakers each an air freshener.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877013</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882655</id>
	<title>The nose knows</title>
	<author>AlpineR</author>
	<datestamp>1256652060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>your knows will tell you that something is up</p></div></blockquote><p>I'm glad to see I'm not the only person making this kind of spelling mistake in an otherwise intelligent post.</p><p>I like to believe that written language is different than spoken language, and is in fact richer in content since many written words render to the same spoken sound. As a person who reads and writes more than he speaks, I'd expect that my brain could keep homonyms straight with ease. But then my fingers go and type a word that sounds like the word I was thinking but is spelled differently and has a totally different meaning.</p><p>For knows/nose, I could at least suppose that part of your brain was composing an ending to that sentence involving 'knowledge' and volunteered that spelling when another part of your brain settled on the 'nose will tell you' phrase.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>your knows will tell you that something is upI 'm glad to see I 'm not the only person making this kind of spelling mistake in an otherwise intelligent post.I like to believe that written language is different than spoken language , and is in fact richer in content since many written words render to the same spoken sound .
As a person who reads and writes more than he speaks , I 'd expect that my brain could keep homonyms straight with ease .
But then my fingers go and type a word that sounds like the word I was thinking but is spelled differently and has a totally different meaning.For knows/nose , I could at least suppose that part of your brain was composing an ending to that sentence involving 'knowledge ' and volunteered that spelling when another part of your brain settled on the 'nose will tell you ' phrase .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>your knows will tell you that something is upI'm glad to see I'm not the only person making this kind of spelling mistake in an otherwise intelligent post.I like to believe that written language is different than spoken language, and is in fact richer in content since many written words render to the same spoken sound.
As a person who reads and writes more than he speaks, I'd expect that my brain could keep homonyms straight with ease.
But then my fingers go and type a word that sounds like the word I was thinking but is spelled differently and has a totally different meaning.For knows/nose, I could at least suppose that part of your brain was composing an ending to that sentence involving 'knowledge' and volunteered that spelling when another part of your brain settled on the 'nose will tell you' phrase.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878361</id>
	<title>Speaking of faulty logic...</title>
	<author>jjoelc</author>
	<datestamp>1256555760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ummm... is it just me, or was bad smells causing bad behavior NOT PRESENT AT ALL in the study... Why do so many comments keep equating the two?

We can debate whether citrus scented windex constitutes a clean smell or not, whether the other methods were robust, etc... But the study was about clean smells and ethical behavior and had nothing to do with bad smells and unethical behavior.

Even assuming that "clean smells" promoted more ethical behavior, it does not logically follow that "unclean" smells would promote unethical behavior. This isn't physics where "equal and opposite reaction" rules apply. It is phsiology and phychology... Where giving a stimulant to a chronically hyperactive child calms them down. Where people always say one thing when they really mean a mother...

Who said clean smells good? Stick your nose over a bottle of ammonia and tell me that again! Yet ammonia is still popular as a cleaning agent, and many would call it a clean smell.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ummm... is it just me , or was bad smells causing bad behavior NOT PRESENT AT ALL in the study... Why do so many comments keep equating the two ?
We can debate whether citrus scented windex constitutes a clean smell or not , whether the other methods were robust , etc... But the study was about clean smells and ethical behavior and had nothing to do with bad smells and unethical behavior .
Even assuming that " clean smells " promoted more ethical behavior , it does not logically follow that " unclean " smells would promote unethical behavior .
This is n't physics where " equal and opposite reaction " rules apply .
It is phsiology and phychology... Where giving a stimulant to a chronically hyperactive child calms them down .
Where people always say one thing when they really mean a mother.. . Who said clean smells good ?
Stick your nose over a bottle of ammonia and tell me that again !
Yet ammonia is still popular as a cleaning agent , and many would call it a clean smell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ummm... is it just me, or was bad smells causing bad behavior NOT PRESENT AT ALL in the study... Why do so many comments keep equating the two?
We can debate whether citrus scented windex constitutes a clean smell or not, whether the other methods were robust, etc... But the study was about clean smells and ethical behavior and had nothing to do with bad smells and unethical behavior.
Even assuming that "clean smells" promoted more ethical behavior, it does not logically follow that "unclean" smells would promote unethical behavior.
This isn't physics where "equal and opposite reaction" rules apply.
It is phsiology and phychology... Where giving a stimulant to a chronically hyperactive child calms them down.
Where people always say one thing when they really mean a mother...

Who said clean smells good?
Stick your nose over a bottle of ammonia and tell me that again!
Yet ammonia is still popular as a cleaning agent, and many would call it a clean smell.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880759</id>
	<title>Re:RTFA!</title>
	<author>R2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1256578140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't sound funny at all.  These are the same folks who establish illegal settlements on land that isn't theirs, demand that the military defend them bodily from the results of those actions, but utterly refuse to participate in that defense.  I would believe them capable of anything, and the true tragedy is that they occupy the position of kingmaker in the political system, and so have had the power to end a conflict that has killed so many of their own faith.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't sound funny at all .
These are the same folks who establish illegal settlements on land that is n't theirs , demand that the military defend them bodily from the results of those actions , but utterly refuse to participate in that defense .
I would believe them capable of anything , and the true tragedy is that they occupy the position of kingmaker in the political system , and so have had the power to end a conflict that has killed so many of their own faith .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't sound funny at all.
These are the same folks who establish illegal settlements on land that isn't theirs, demand that the military defend them bodily from the results of those actions, but utterly refuse to participate in that defense.
I would believe them capable of anything, and the true tragedy is that they occupy the position of kingmaker in the political system, and so have had the power to end a conflict that has killed so many of their own faith.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879907</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879119</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>ShakaUVM</author>
	<datestamp>1256560920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;If a place smells like a moose just died in it, especially if its also visibly dirty, then I just sort of get the impression that it doesn't actually matter what I do in there.</p><p>Personally, I just want to kick the shit out of anyone who sits next to me with a horrible case of BO.</p><p>It's true - bad smells do cause bad thoughts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; If a place smells like a moose just died in it , especially if its also visibly dirty , then I just sort of get the impression that it does n't actually matter what I do in there.Personally , I just want to kick the shit out of anyone who sits next to me with a horrible case of BO.It 's true - bad smells do cause bad thoughts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;If a place smells like a moose just died in it, especially if its also visibly dirty, then I just sort of get the impression that it doesn't actually matter what I do in there.Personally, I just want to kick the shit out of anyone who sits next to me with a horrible case of BO.It's true - bad smells do cause bad thoughts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29885673</id>
	<title>Makes sense!</title>
	<author>Wh15per</author>
	<datestamp>1256666760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This seems to make pretty good sense.

Take the fire service in America. Some volunteer fire departments take great pride in their firehouses and apparatus. They clean them regularly, train and drill on a regular basis, and project an image of "professionalism." Other departments, well, you can tell those that don't take as much pride in their equipment and house. The same would apply to just about anything else. If your people/family members/employees/slaves have pride in their enviornment, then that is reflected in their behavior.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This seems to make pretty good sense .
Take the fire service in America .
Some volunteer fire departments take great pride in their firehouses and apparatus .
They clean them regularly , train and drill on a regular basis , and project an image of " professionalism .
" Other departments , well , you can tell those that do n't take as much pride in their equipment and house .
The same would apply to just about anything else .
If your people/family members/employees/slaves have pride in their enviornment , then that is reflected in their behavior .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This seems to make pretty good sense.
Take the fire service in America.
Some volunteer fire departments take great pride in their firehouses and apparatus.
They clean them regularly, train and drill on a regular basis, and project an image of "professionalism.
" Other departments, well, you can tell those that don't take as much pride in their equipment and house.
The same would apply to just about anything else.
If your people/family members/employees/slaves have pride in their enviornment, then that is reflected in their behavior.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879039</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>baKanale</author>
	<datestamp>1256560260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe it's a similar effect to one of the conclusions from "<a href="http://improbable.com/2009/10/21/guardian-column-179/" title="improbable.com" rel="nofollow">A prompt plus delayed contingency procedure for reducing bathroom graffiti</a> [improbable.com]".  When a space is well taken care of maybe people unconsciously realize that someone's paying attention to the space and act accordingly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it 's a similar effect to one of the conclusions from " A prompt plus delayed contingency procedure for reducing bathroom graffiti [ improbable.com ] " .
When a space is well taken care of maybe people unconsciously realize that someone 's paying attention to the space and act accordingly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it's a similar effect to one of the conclusions from "A prompt plus delayed contingency procedure for reducing bathroom graffiti [improbable.com]".
When a space is well taken care of maybe people unconsciously realize that someone's paying attention to the space and act accordingly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877957</id>
	<title>Re:Happiness, I agree...</title>
	<author>sourICE</author>
	<datestamp>1256553840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't know about any of you, but being in a smelly, disgusting store makes me unhappy.</p></div><p>I agree and I base my entire mood on the smells of the locations I have been to during my day.</p><p>For instance, if I go into a gas station bathroom during my day I am liable to become completely enraged or possibly even suicidal at the thought of the acts previously taken in order to create such smells.</p><p>Depending upon how bad the smells were, I may even kidnap a child or go on a shooting rampage because of them.</p><p>On the other hand if I journey to a flower shop and take in the 'wonderful' scents of flowers and the unneeded perfumes I am likely to smell emanating from the woman behind the counter I will go even crazier due to my allergies and form some sort of murderous coalition or cult.</p><p>As you can clearly see, this proves smells have a great effect on emotions and the actions taken because of them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about any of you , but being in a smelly , disgusting store makes me unhappy.I agree and I base my entire mood on the smells of the locations I have been to during my day.For instance , if I go into a gas station bathroom during my day I am liable to become completely enraged or possibly even suicidal at the thought of the acts previously taken in order to create such smells.Depending upon how bad the smells were , I may even kidnap a child or go on a shooting rampage because of them.On the other hand if I journey to a flower shop and take in the 'wonderful ' scents of flowers and the unneeded perfumes I am likely to smell emanating from the woman behind the counter I will go even crazier due to my allergies and form some sort of murderous coalition or cult.As you can clearly see , this proves smells have a great effect on emotions and the actions taken because of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about any of you, but being in a smelly, disgusting store makes me unhappy.I agree and I base my entire mood on the smells of the locations I have been to during my day.For instance, if I go into a gas station bathroom during my day I am liable to become completely enraged or possibly even suicidal at the thought of the acts previously taken in order to create such smells.Depending upon how bad the smells were, I may even kidnap a child or go on a shooting rampage because of them.On the other hand if I journey to a flower shop and take in the 'wonderful' scents of flowers and the unneeded perfumes I am likely to smell emanating from the woman behind the counter I will go even crazier due to my allergies and form some sort of murderous coalition or cult.As you can clearly see, this proves smells have a great effect on emotions and the actions taken because of them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879583</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>electrons\_are\_brave</author>
	<datestamp>1256564340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The assumption is that the subjects are drawing an unconscious assocation between Windex = Cleanliness = Spotless conscience = Honest behaviour. But why not Windex = Someone's cleaning the freakin' windows = I can be seen = honest behaviour.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The assumption is that the subjects are drawing an unconscious assocation between Windex = Cleanliness = Spotless conscience = Honest behaviour .
But why not Windex = Someone 's cleaning the freakin ' windows = I can be seen = honest behaviour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The assumption is that the subjects are drawing an unconscious assocation between Windex = Cleanliness = Spotless conscience = Honest behaviour.
But why not Windex = Someone's cleaning the freakin' windows = I can be seen = honest behaviour.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877113</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879359</id>
	<title>Re:But...</title>
	<author>Whiteox</author>
	<datestamp>1256562600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It depends on which of the ethical schools you're subscribing to.</p></div><p>You forgot Moses. Can't place my hands on the source, but it has something to do with not stealing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It depends on which of the ethical schools you 're subscribing to.You forgot Moses .
Ca n't place my hands on the source , but it has something to do with not stealing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It depends on which of the ethical schools you're subscribing to.You forgot Moses.
Can't place my hands on the source, but it has something to do with not stealing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881901</id>
	<title>Re:But...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256641980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're Mormons so they're using the magical plate and mystical underwear model of ethics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're Mormons so they 're using the magical plate and mystical underwear model of ethics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're Mormons so they're using the magical plate and mystical underwear model of ethics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876807</id>
	<title>Smells like Mom is angry again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256549280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know she only cleans this thoroughly when she's angry, so we'd damn well better behave until this blows over.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know she only cleans this thoroughly when she 's angry , so we 'd damn well better behave until this blows over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know she only cleans this thoroughly when she's angry, so we'd damn well better behave until this blows over.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29894393</id>
	<title>My Poor Nose!</title>
	<author>longbot</author>
	<datestamp>1256723760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Okay, I'm going to call bullshit on this one.
<br> <br>
This may or may not work on most of the populous (and the science behind it seems more than a little fishy) but for me, I find the exact opposite to be the case. Cleaners, perfume, deodorants, scented soaps, and other like products not only disgust me, but also produce symptoms similar to allergies in me (and several other people I know). If I smell Axe on someone, I immediately suspect that they're trying to cover up not having taken a shower. And if a place smells of bleach or ammonia... I wonder what the horrible mess was that necessitated bringing out the hardcore cleaning chemicals.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , I 'm going to call bullshit on this one .
This may or may not work on most of the populous ( and the science behind it seems more than a little fishy ) but for me , I find the exact opposite to be the case .
Cleaners , perfume , deodorants , scented soaps , and other like products not only disgust me , but also produce symptoms similar to allergies in me ( and several other people I know ) .
If I smell Axe on someone , I immediately suspect that they 're trying to cover up not having taken a shower .
And if a place smells of bleach or ammonia... I wonder what the horrible mess was that necessitated bringing out the hardcore cleaning chemicals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, I'm going to call bullshit on this one.
This may or may not work on most of the populous (and the science behind it seems more than a little fishy) but for me, I find the exact opposite to be the case.
Cleaners, perfume, deodorants, scented soaps, and other like products not only disgust me, but also produce symptoms similar to allergies in me (and several other people I know).
If I smell Axe on someone, I immediately suspect that they're trying to cover up not having taken a shower.
And if a place smells of bleach or ammonia... I wonder what the horrible mess was that necessitated bringing out the hardcore cleaning chemicals.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877575</id>
	<title>/^v^|\/^V:^:\_ CALL 911! TrisexualPuppy is on FIRE!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256552220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The</p><blockquote><div><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/^v^|\/^V:^:\_</p></div> </blockquote><p> is supposed to look like fire.</p><p>Mod Parent Up</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The / ^ v ^ | \ / ^ V : ^ : \ _ is supposed to look like fire.Mod Parent Up</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The /^v^|\/^V:^:\_  is supposed to look like fire.Mod Parent Up
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877227</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879219</id>
	<title>Re:But...</title>
	<author>Ihmhi</author>
	<datestamp>1256561520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You must be great fun at parties.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You must be great fun at parties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must be great fun at parties.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877783</id>
	<title>Re:glamour shots?</title>
	<author>Larryish</author>
	<datestamp>1256553120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks like she is standing behind a windows covered in hot grits.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like she is standing behind a windows covered in hot grits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like she is standing behind a windows covered in hot grits.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880109</id>
	<title>I smell a lawsuit</title>
	<author>Seantotheizzo</author>
	<datestamp>1256569680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if this means I can legally defend my assault against my coworker the next time he passes gas next to my cubicle?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this means I can legally defend my assault against my coworker the next time he passes gas next to my cubicle ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if this means I can legally defend my assault against my coworker the next time he passes gas next to my cubicle?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881935</id>
	<title>Logic suggests...</title>
	<author>Genda</author>
	<datestamp>1256642520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By logical extrapolation of this article, I presume this means that the Senate must then smell like dirty gym socks...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By logical extrapolation of this article , I presume this means that the Senate must then smell like dirty gym socks.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By logical extrapolation of this article, I presume this means that the Senate must then smell like dirty gym socks...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877899</id>
	<title>You ain't seen nothing yet</title>
	<author>tinkerton</author>
	<datestamp>1256553540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait till they try out Linex. Trounces Windex hands down it will!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait till they try out Linex .
Trounces Windex hands down it will !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait till they try out Linex.
Trounces Windex hands down it will!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877437</id>
	<title>Citrius Windex makes me punch things</title>
	<author>BlueBoxSW.com</author>
	<datestamp>1256551680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not sure how it could encourage good behavior.</p><p>Blah.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not sure how it could encourage good behavior.Blah .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not sure how it could encourage good behavior.Blah.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876883</id>
	<title>glamour shots?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256549580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's with the modeling/glamour shots photo of the professor on the article?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's with the modeling/glamour shots photo of the professor on the article ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's with the modeling/glamour shots photo of the professor on the article?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879389</id>
	<title>THAT's the problem with corporate america!</title>
	<author>mabhatter654</author>
	<datestamp>1256562780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More proof we need to clean up how our corporate masters live.</p><p>Surround yourself with expensive, old alcohol, expensive stinky cigars, old dead animal furniture... and the smell of used hookers... that's the IDEAL of "good" business men?  No wonder we're so fucked up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More proof we need to clean up how our corporate masters live.Surround yourself with expensive , old alcohol , expensive stinky cigars , old dead animal furniture... and the smell of used hookers... that 's the IDEAL of " good " business men ?
No wonder we 're so fucked up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More proof we need to clean up how our corporate masters live.Surround yourself with expensive, old alcohol, expensive stinky cigars, old dead animal furniture... and the smell of used hookers... that's the IDEAL of "good" business men?
No wonder we're so fucked up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877513</id>
	<title>Re:junk science</title>
	<author>pz</author>
	<datestamp>1256551980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's no link to the original study, but it was clear from the article that there was no control group. They had a scented room vs. an unscented room, when what they should have had was a "pleasantly" scented room vs. an "unpleasantly" scented room with a third, unscented room as the control.  Then they should have done some feedback questionnaires at the conclusion, in which they could have buried a question or two regarding the participant's scent preferences to see how well the participants' evaluation of the smell of the rooms lined-up with the premise of the study.</p><p>This study was actually just a subset of the premise that happy people are more likely to be grateful and donate their time and/or money than unhappy people, and that environmental factors can influence a person's relative happiness. And a demonstration that an attractive woman can get money and resources from a major university to run a useless study.</p></div><p>So you're supposing that the mere scenting of a room, with any scent whatsoever, will increase the chance of ethical behavior?  Interesting.  Sounds like you need to do a follow-on study, rather than bash the first one without having read the original manuscript.  According to the article, they *did* have a feedback questionnaire, and the participants did not notice the scent.  More importantly, however, we do not know from the article whether this was a double blind study.  The devil is in the details for behavioral studies like this, and an easy way to eliminate many uncontrolled variables is to make it double blind.</p><p>Finally, it is rather presumptuous to state that BYU funded the research, especially given the list of three total collaborators come from three different universities.  Also, I've personally filled out scores of grant applications from my local institution, private foundations, and national agencies.  None of them required or even requested a photograph.  I'm therefore highly dubious about your last conclusion.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's no link to the original study , but it was clear from the article that there was no control group .
They had a scented room vs. an unscented room , when what they should have had was a " pleasantly " scented room vs. an " unpleasantly " scented room with a third , unscented room as the control .
Then they should have done some feedback questionnaires at the conclusion , in which they could have buried a question or two regarding the participant 's scent preferences to see how well the participants ' evaluation of the smell of the rooms lined-up with the premise of the study.This study was actually just a subset of the premise that happy people are more likely to be grateful and donate their time and/or money than unhappy people , and that environmental factors can influence a person 's relative happiness .
And a demonstration that an attractive woman can get money and resources from a major university to run a useless study.So you 're supposing that the mere scenting of a room , with any scent whatsoever , will increase the chance of ethical behavior ?
Interesting. Sounds like you need to do a follow-on study , rather than bash the first one without having read the original manuscript .
According to the article , they * did * have a feedback questionnaire , and the participants did not notice the scent .
More importantly , however , we do not know from the article whether this was a double blind study .
The devil is in the details for behavioral studies like this , and an easy way to eliminate many uncontrolled variables is to make it double blind.Finally , it is rather presumptuous to state that BYU funded the research , especially given the list of three total collaborators come from three different universities .
Also , I 've personally filled out scores of grant applications from my local institution , private foundations , and national agencies .
None of them required or even requested a photograph .
I 'm therefore highly dubious about your last conclusion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's no link to the original study, but it was clear from the article that there was no control group.
They had a scented room vs. an unscented room, when what they should have had was a "pleasantly" scented room vs. an "unpleasantly" scented room with a third, unscented room as the control.
Then they should have done some feedback questionnaires at the conclusion, in which they could have buried a question or two regarding the participant's scent preferences to see how well the participants' evaluation of the smell of the rooms lined-up with the premise of the study.This study was actually just a subset of the premise that happy people are more likely to be grateful and donate their time and/or money than unhappy people, and that environmental factors can influence a person's relative happiness.
And a demonstration that an attractive woman can get money and resources from a major university to run a useless study.So you're supposing that the mere scenting of a room, with any scent whatsoever, will increase the chance of ethical behavior?
Interesting.  Sounds like you need to do a follow-on study, rather than bash the first one without having read the original manuscript.
According to the article, they *did* have a feedback questionnaire, and the participants did not notice the scent.
More importantly, however, we do not know from the article whether this was a double blind study.
The devil is in the details for behavioral studies like this, and an easy way to eliminate many uncontrolled variables is to make it double blind.Finally, it is rather presumptuous to state that BYU funded the research, especially given the list of three total collaborators come from three different universities.
Also, I've personally filled out scores of grant applications from my local institution, private foundations, and national agencies.
None of them required or even requested a photograph.
I'm therefore highly dubious about your last conclusion.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877037</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880625</id>
	<title>References needed</title>
	<author>aero6dof</author>
	<datestamp>1256576040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've got to the get the name of Windex's astroturf agency - brilliant marketing!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got to the get the name of Windex 's astroturf agency - brilliant marketing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got to the get the name of Windex's astroturf agency - brilliant marketing!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29885727</id>
	<title>It's called Sex Panther by Odeon.</title>
	<author>sunyjim</author>
	<datestamp>1256666940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They've done studies, you know. 60\% of the time it works, every time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've done studies , you know .
60 \ % of the time it works , every time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've done studies, you know.
60\% of the time it works, every time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29884655</id>
	<title>Re:RTFA!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256662080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, when I read things like this, it makes me think that Israel is, or is turning into, "just another crummy middle eastern nation."  I don't really care which version of the magic sky fairy's magic book people read, change a few of the words and this is Iran or Saudi Arabia.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , when I read things like this , it makes me think that Israel is , or is turning into , " just another crummy middle eastern nation .
" I do n't really care which version of the magic sky fairy 's magic book people read , change a few of the words and this is Iran or Saudi Arabia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, when I read things like this, it makes me think that Israel is, or is turning into, "just another crummy middle eastern nation.
"  I don't really care which version of the magic sky fairy's magic book people read, change a few of the words and this is Iran or Saudi Arabia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879907</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881631</id>
	<title>Re:junk science</title>
	<author>risom</author>
	<datestamp>1256636700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's no link to the original study, but it was clear from the article that there was no control group. They had a scented room vs. an unscented room, when what they should have had was a "pleasantly" scented room vs. an "unpleasantly" scented room with a third, unscented room as the control.  Then they should have done some feedback questionnaires at the conclusion, in which they could have buried a question or two regarding the participant's scent preferences to see how well the participants' evaluation of the smell of the rooms lined-up with the premise of the study.</p></div><p>I agree with that. 3 or even 4 different levels of scent would also help determine the right amount for maximum effect (if there really is any). <br><br>
The second problem is the small amount of test persons involved: "Twenty-eight participants (12 female) were individually assigned to either a clean-
scented room or a baseline room." (You can find the article by googling "The Smell of Virtue"). That means 14 people per group which does not seem to be much if you want to seriously control unknown variables - one of which can be gender (I couldn't find out from the article whether the16 men/12 women were equally distributed).</p><p><div class="quote"><p> And a demonstration that an attractive woman can get money and resources from a major university to run a useless study.</p></div><p>That my friend is sexism. And as a completely unproven hyothesis ridicules your criticism of the above study too. Or do you have any hard facts to prove your point that the researchers gender is the cause for the bad study?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's no link to the original study , but it was clear from the article that there was no control group .
They had a scented room vs. an unscented room , when what they should have had was a " pleasantly " scented room vs. an " unpleasantly " scented room with a third , unscented room as the control .
Then they should have done some feedback questionnaires at the conclusion , in which they could have buried a question or two regarding the participant 's scent preferences to see how well the participants ' evaluation of the smell of the rooms lined-up with the premise of the study.I agree with that .
3 or even 4 different levels of scent would also help determine the right amount for maximum effect ( if there really is any ) .
The second problem is the small amount of test persons involved : " Twenty-eight participants ( 12 female ) were individually assigned to either a clean- scented room or a baseline room .
" ( You can find the article by googling " The Smell of Virtue " ) .
That means 14 people per group which does not seem to be much if you want to seriously control unknown variables - one of which can be gender ( I could n't find out from the article whether the16 men/12 women were equally distributed ) .
And a demonstration that an attractive woman can get money and resources from a major university to run a useless study.That my friend is sexism .
And as a completely unproven hyothesis ridicules your criticism of the above study too .
Or do you have any hard facts to prove your point that the researchers gender is the cause for the bad study ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's no link to the original study, but it was clear from the article that there was no control group.
They had a scented room vs. an unscented room, when what they should have had was a "pleasantly" scented room vs. an "unpleasantly" scented room with a third, unscented room as the control.
Then they should have done some feedback questionnaires at the conclusion, in which they could have buried a question or two regarding the participant's scent preferences to see how well the participants' evaluation of the smell of the rooms lined-up with the premise of the study.I agree with that.
3 or even 4 different levels of scent would also help determine the right amount for maximum effect (if there really is any).
The second problem is the small amount of test persons involved: "Twenty-eight participants (12 female) were individually assigned to either a clean-
scented room or a baseline room.
" (You can find the article by googling "The Smell of Virtue").
That means 14 people per group which does not seem to be much if you want to seriously control unknown variables - one of which can be gender (I couldn't find out from the article whether the16 men/12 women were equally distributed).
And a demonstration that an attractive woman can get money and resources from a major university to run a useless study.That my friend is sexism.
And as a completely unproven hyothesis ridicules your criticism of the above study too.
Or do you have any hard facts to prove your point that the researchers gender is the cause for the bad study?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877037</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882213</id>
	<title>Re:RTFA!</title>
	<author>M8e</author>
	<datestamp>1256647860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Boiling water and rocks have also been used.</p></div><p>lava?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Boiling water and rocks have also been used.lava ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boiling water and rocks have also been used.lava?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879907</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877217</id>
	<title>Re:Ammonia, Detergents or Scents?</title>
	<author>NotBornYesterday</author>
	<datestamp>1256550780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Makes you wonder who sponsored the experiment, eh?<br>
<br>
<i>This moment in science sponsored by the good folks at Windex.</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Makes you wonder who sponsored the experiment , eh ?
This moment in science sponsored by the good folks at Windex .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Makes you wonder who sponsored the experiment, eh?
This moment in science sponsored by the good folks at Windex.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879283</id>
	<title>I did not know that!</title>
	<author>Whiteox</author>
	<datestamp>1256562120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Windex comes in citrus?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Windex comes in citrus ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Windex comes in citrus?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881641</id>
	<title>Dutch ovens!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256636940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Need time I dutch oven the missus, ill tell her I just want her to get real dirty<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Need time I dutch oven the missus , ill tell her I just want her to get real dirty : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Need time I dutch oven the missus, ill tell her I just want her to get real dirty :D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877971</id>
	<title>Re:Clean smells? Windex?</title>
	<author>Valdrax</author>
	<datestamp>1256553900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Let's get this straight. Windex typically reeks of ammonia. And so do public elevators where winos have urinated.</p><p>A coincidence? A paradox? Or, are the guys at Brigham Young sniffing gold spraypaint trying to come up with new ideas? Hmmmmm...?</p></div><p>As bad as the rigor of this study seems to be, your counter-point doesn't actually defeat what it says.  Windex, urine, and urine covered up by Windex don't all smell the same, and elevators that are likely to be soiled are very different social settings from rooms at a graduate research center.  The social triggers differ with all of these things.</p><p>The results of the study don't particularly surprise me.  Think of how people act in clean v. dirty bathrooms or how vandalism that isn't cleaned up invites further vandalism.  I'm just worried that idiots will think that ALL you need is the *smell* of Windex and not *actual* efforts at cleaning up a cesspit.  Or that we'll be assaulted with overbearing smells of cleaning products at banks and stores (which would eventually wear away the mental association and make it *doubly* futile).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's get this straight .
Windex typically reeks of ammonia .
And so do public elevators where winos have urinated.A coincidence ?
A paradox ?
Or , are the guys at Brigham Young sniffing gold spraypaint trying to come up with new ideas ?
Hmmmmm... ? As bad as the rigor of this study seems to be , your counter-point does n't actually defeat what it says .
Windex , urine , and urine covered up by Windex do n't all smell the same , and elevators that are likely to be soiled are very different social settings from rooms at a graduate research center .
The social triggers differ with all of these things.The results of the study do n't particularly surprise me .
Think of how people act in clean v. dirty bathrooms or how vandalism that is n't cleaned up invites further vandalism .
I 'm just worried that idiots will think that ALL you need is the * smell * of Windex and not * actual * efforts at cleaning up a cesspit .
Or that we 'll be assaulted with overbearing smells of cleaning products at banks and stores ( which would eventually wear away the mental association and make it * doubly * futile ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's get this straight.
Windex typically reeks of ammonia.
And so do public elevators where winos have urinated.A coincidence?
A paradox?
Or, are the guys at Brigham Young sniffing gold spraypaint trying to come up with new ideas?
Hmmmmm...?As bad as the rigor of this study seems to be, your counter-point doesn't actually defeat what it says.
Windex, urine, and urine covered up by Windex don't all smell the same, and elevators that are likely to be soiled are very different social settings from rooms at a graduate research center.
The social triggers differ with all of these things.The results of the study don't particularly surprise me.
Think of how people act in clean v. dirty bathrooms or how vandalism that isn't cleaned up invites further vandalism.
I'm just worried that idiots will think that ALL you need is the *smell* of Windex and not *actual* efforts at cleaning up a cesspit.
Or that we'll be assaulted with overbearing smells of cleaning products at banks and stores (which would eventually wear away the mental association and make it *doubly* futile).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877227</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878257</id>
	<title>Guns dont kill</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1256555160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>People do. Smells aren't the ones that do that, but associations of it in people's mind. What seem to work in some regions or cultures could have different effects in others.

If associations are the ones that do the job, then trends of decoration (not just smell, but visual, lights, architecture, etc) for public places should follow that ideas. Of course, i don't think that the only alternative that will be good for banks is to look and smell like torture chambers, but probably most elements that promote some behaviour were tested in the past in a way or another.</htmltext>
<tokenext>People do .
Smells are n't the ones that do that , but associations of it in people 's mind .
What seem to work in some regions or cultures could have different effects in others .
If associations are the ones that do the job , then trends of decoration ( not just smell , but visual , lights , architecture , etc ) for public places should follow that ideas .
Of course , i do n't think that the only alternative that will be good for banks is to look and smell like torture chambers , but probably most elements that promote some behaviour were tested in the past in a way or another .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People do.
Smells aren't the ones that do that, but associations of it in people's mind.
What seem to work in some regions or cultures could have different effects in others.
If associations are the ones that do the job, then trends of decoration (not just smell, but visual, lights, architecture, etc) for public places should follow that ideas.
Of course, i don't think that the only alternative that will be good for banks is to look and smell like torture chambers, but probably most elements that promote some behaviour were tested in the past in a way or another.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881505</id>
	<title>Re:But...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256634480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except the bank pays insurance premiums and we pay bank fees, subtracting that very same money from the economy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except the bank pays insurance premiums and we pay bank fees , subtracting that very same money from the economy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except the bank pays insurance premiums and we pay bank fees, subtracting that very same money from the economy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877043</id>
	<title>Fish smells like yo mama is horny again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256550120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You know she only cleans this thoroughly when she's angry, so we'd damn well better behave until this blows over.</p></div><p>Your mom knew how to blow ME over.  I swear, she can suck a basketball through a garden hose.  The woman is very talented.
<br> <br>
Why do niggers hate aspirin?  It's white, it works, and they really hate having to pick the cotton out of the bottle.
<br>
How was copper wiring invented?  Two jews fighting over a penny.
<br>
Ever heard of the Mexican auto races?  Yeah, first one to get the car started wins.
<br>
How come there's no Mexican Olympics?  All the spics who can run, swim, and jump are already in the USA.
<br>
Why do niggers make such great gynecologists?  They are used to curly hair, big lips, and bad breath.
<br>
How do you make a nigger self-destruct?  Tell him that basketball was invented by a white man.
<br>
What's long, black, and stinky?  The welfare line.
<br>
Yo mama so stupid, she threw a rock at the ground.  And missed.
<br>
What do you call a bunch of niggers hangin around a barn?  Antique farm equipment.
<br>
What was the only thing missing from the Million Man March?  Three miles of chain and an auctioneer.
<br> <br>
You're too chickenshit to admit it, but you laughed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know she only cleans this thoroughly when she 's angry , so we 'd damn well better behave until this blows over.Your mom knew how to blow ME over .
I swear , she can suck a basketball through a garden hose .
The woman is very talented .
Why do niggers hate aspirin ?
It 's white , it works , and they really hate having to pick the cotton out of the bottle .
How was copper wiring invented ?
Two jews fighting over a penny .
Ever heard of the Mexican auto races ?
Yeah , first one to get the car started wins .
How come there 's no Mexican Olympics ?
All the spics who can run , swim , and jump are already in the USA .
Why do niggers make such great gynecologists ?
They are used to curly hair , big lips , and bad breath .
How do you make a nigger self-destruct ?
Tell him that basketball was invented by a white man .
What 's long , black , and stinky ?
The welfare line .
Yo mama so stupid , she threw a rock at the ground .
And missed .
What do you call a bunch of niggers hangin around a barn ?
Antique farm equipment .
What was the only thing missing from the Million Man March ?
Three miles of chain and an auctioneer .
You 're too chickenshit to admit it , but you laughed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know she only cleans this thoroughly when she's angry, so we'd damn well better behave until this blows over.Your mom knew how to blow ME over.
I swear, she can suck a basketball through a garden hose.
The woman is very talented.
Why do niggers hate aspirin?
It's white, it works, and they really hate having to pick the cotton out of the bottle.
How was copper wiring invented?
Two jews fighting over a penny.
Ever heard of the Mexican auto races?
Yeah, first one to get the car started wins.
How come there's no Mexican Olympics?
All the spics who can run, swim, and jump are already in the USA.
Why do niggers make such great gynecologists?
They are used to curly hair, big lips, and bad breath.
How do you make a nigger self-destruct?
Tell him that basketball was invented by a white man.
What's long, black, and stinky?
The welfare line.
Yo mama so stupid, she threw a rock at the ground.
And missed.
What do you call a bunch of niggers hangin around a barn?
Antique farm equipment.
What was the only thing missing from the Million Man March?
Three miles of chain and an auctioneer.
You're too chickenshit to admit it, but you laughed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876807</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877409</id>
	<title>Windex? seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256551620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This ethical study brought to you by S. C. Johnson &amp; Son Inc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This ethical study brought to you by S. C. Johnson &amp; Son Inc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This ethical study brought to you by S. C. Johnson &amp; Son Inc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29883399</id>
	<title>this certainly explains why</title>
	<author>nimbius</author>
	<datestamp>1256656260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>when someone farts in an elevator I have the unethical urge to beat them with their own shoes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>when someone farts in an elevator I have the unethical urge to beat them with their own shoes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when someone farts in an elevator I have the unethical urge to beat them with their own shoes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877153</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>Ethanol-fueled</author>
	<datestamp>1256550540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think so. There's a lot of <a href="http://www.katu.com/news/medicalalert/25836839.html" title="katu.com" rel="nofollow">harsh chemistry</a> [katu.com] in many air fresheners that many people don't like. I'd rather smell some stray earth than some sterile hodgepodge of toxic chemicals that reminds me of the overbearing preparation of cheap hotel rooms frequented by prostitutes.<br> <br>

I can't even stand those little air fresheners people put in cars. Why would anybody want their car to smell cheap, like oranges or other food? (Note: it's usually the fat chicks who like their houses and cars smelling like peaches or vanilla anyway)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think so .
There 's a lot of harsh chemistry [ katu.com ] in many air fresheners that many people do n't like .
I 'd rather smell some stray earth than some sterile hodgepodge of toxic chemicals that reminds me of the overbearing preparation of cheap hotel rooms frequented by prostitutes .
I ca n't even stand those little air fresheners people put in cars .
Why would anybody want their car to smell cheap , like oranges or other food ?
( Note : it 's usually the fat chicks who like their houses and cars smelling like peaches or vanilla anyway )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think so.
There's a lot of harsh chemistry [katu.com] in many air fresheners that many people don't like.
I'd rather smell some stray earth than some sterile hodgepodge of toxic chemicals that reminds me of the overbearing preparation of cheap hotel rooms frequented by prostitutes.
I can't even stand those little air fresheners people put in cars.
Why would anybody want their car to smell cheap, like oranges or other food?
(Note: it's usually the fat chicks who like their houses and cars smelling like peaches or vanilla anyway)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876865</id>
	<title>Happiness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256549520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know about any of you, but being in a smelly, disgusting store makes me unhappy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about any of you , but being in a smelly , disgusting store makes me unhappy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about any of you, but being in a smelly, disgusting store makes me unhappy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877397</id>
	<title>So it is the new car smell ...</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1256551500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... that makes the auto salesmen pull all kinds of dirty tricks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... that makes the auto salesmen pull all kinds of dirty tricks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... that makes the auto salesmen pull all kinds of dirty tricks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29883499</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>that IT girl</author>
	<datestamp>1256656800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This may be true, but in keeping crime down in a large society, what's easier? Actually changing people from the inside, or doing what is needed to maintain order on the outside?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This may be true , but in keeping crime down in a large society , what 's easier ?
Actually changing people from the inside , or doing what is needed to maintain order on the outside ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This may be true, but in keeping crime down in a large society, what's easier?
Actually changing people from the inside, or doing what is needed to maintain order on the outside?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877129</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882061</id>
	<title>Re:RTFA!</title>
	<author>Fear the Clam</author>
	<datestamp>1256644740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Boiling water and rocks have also been used.</i></p><p>Hey, the courts found that to be a <em>legitimate</em> stone soup accident.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Boiling water and rocks have also been used.Hey , the courts found that to be a legitimate stone soup accident .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boiling water and rocks have also been used.Hey, the courts found that to be a legitimate stone soup accident.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879907</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878069</id>
	<title>Hawthorne Effect</title>
	<author>MountainLogic</author>
	<datestamp>1256554320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is a famous study (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne\_effect) in which they were looking at the effect of lighting levels on productivity in a manufacturing environment.  If they turned up the light productivity improved, if they lowered lighting level productivity improved, if they returned lighting to the original level productivity improved.  The reason was that changing light levels signaled to the workers that something was up and that they were likely being watched.  Walk into a room dripping with cleaner and your knows will tell you that something is up and you better watch out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a famous study ( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne \ _effect ) in which they were looking at the effect of lighting levels on productivity in a manufacturing environment .
If they turned up the light productivity improved , if they lowered lighting level productivity improved , if they returned lighting to the original level productivity improved .
The reason was that changing light levels signaled to the workers that something was up and that they were likely being watched .
Walk into a room dripping with cleaner and your knows will tell you that something is up and you better watch out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a famous study (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne\_effect) in which they were looking at the effect of lighting levels on productivity in a manufacturing environment.
If they turned up the light productivity improved, if they lowered lighting level productivity improved, if they returned lighting to the original level productivity improved.
The reason was that changing light levels signaled to the workers that something was up and that they were likely being watched.
Walk into a room dripping with cleaner and your knows will tell you that something is up and you better watch out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877129</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881375</id>
	<title>Hasn't this already been proposed?</title>
	<author>rubenerd</author>
	<datestamp>1256674980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This sounds like the theory proposed in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixing\_Broken\_Windows" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Fixing Broken Windows</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>This sounds like the theory proposed in Fixing Broken Windows [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sounds like the theory proposed in Fixing Broken Windows [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879289</id>
	<title>Chemical smells = ill</title>
	<author>lul\_wat</author>
	<datestamp>1256562120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Chemical smells make me feel instantly ill<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. cleaners, cigarette smoke, air 'fresheners'<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. all instantly feel sick / headache</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chemical smells make me feel instantly ill .. cleaners , cigarette smoke , air 'fresheners ' .. all instantly feel sick / headache</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chemical smells make me feel instantly ill .. cleaners, cigarette smoke, air 'fresheners' .. all instantly feel sick / headache</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878497</id>
	<title>Re:junk science</title>
	<author>blurryrunner</author>
	<datestamp>1256556720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I found a reference to the article in a simple google. From the main author's profile at BYU's Marriott School:<br>
<br>
"The Smell of Virtue: Clean Scents Promote Reciprocity and Charity.," Psychological Science 2009 <br>
<br>
The professor's profile:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://marriottschool.byu.edu/employee/employee.cfm?emp=kla520" title="byu.edu" rel="nofollow">http://marriottschool.byu.edu/employee/employee.cfm?emp=kla520</a> [byu.edu] <br>
<br>
br/</htmltext>
<tokenext>I found a reference to the article in a simple google .
From the main author 's profile at BYU 's Marriott School : " The Smell of Virtue : Clean Scents Promote Reciprocity and Charity. , " Psychological Science 2009 The professor 's profile : http : //marriottschool.byu.edu/employee/employee.cfm ? emp = kla520 [ byu.edu ] br/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I found a reference to the article in a simple google.
From the main author's profile at BYU's Marriott School:

"The Smell of Virtue: Clean Scents Promote Reciprocity and Charity.," Psychological Science 2009 

The professor's profile:

http://marriottschool.byu.edu/employee/employee.cfm?emp=kla520 [byu.edu] 

br/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877037</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877677</id>
	<title>Strip Club Smell?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256552700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about at strip clubs, where they clean frequently with Isopropyl Alcohol... Those places are ethical right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about at strip clubs , where they clean frequently with Isopropyl Alcohol... Those places are ethical right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about at strip clubs, where they clean frequently with Isopropyl Alcohol... Those places are ethical right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878483</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256556660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Albert Einstein was wrong</htmltext>
<tokenext>Albert Einstein was wrong</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Albert Einstein was wrong</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877113</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877571</id>
	<title>Re:Crappy experiment</title>
	<author>Z00L00K</author>
	<datestamp>1256552220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suspect that the reason is rather that unclean smells triggers the more competitive behavior of humans because it can be an indication of lack of food or other resources, which in turn means that the strongest and most resourceful can be the one that is gaining the most.</p><p>A clean smell can instead tell the subconscious mind that there is sufficient resources available.</p><p>So this may be a good reason to actually make sure that public areas are clean.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect that the reason is rather that unclean smells triggers the more competitive behavior of humans because it can be an indication of lack of food or other resources , which in turn means that the strongest and most resourceful can be the one that is gaining the most.A clean smell can instead tell the subconscious mind that there is sufficient resources available.So this may be a good reason to actually make sure that public areas are clean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect that the reason is rather that unclean smells triggers the more competitive behavior of humans because it can be an indication of lack of food or other resources, which in turn means that the strongest and most resourceful can be the one that is gaining the most.A clean smell can instead tell the subconscious mind that there is sufficient resources available.So this may be a good reason to actually make sure that public areas are clean.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876893</id>
	<title>Crappy experiment</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256549580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's crappy experiments like this that give pseudo-science a bad name.</p><p>There are so many confounding and uncontrolled variables that the results are meaningless.</p><p>Did they repeat the experiment with the clean and dirty rooms swapped?</p><p>Were the subjects and experiment runners randomized?  How many subjects?</p><p>Were the subjects sequestered or could they have smelled the Windex while waiting to participate?</p><p>Were there any other differences between the test rooms?</p><p>It's crappy experiments like this that give pseudo-science a bad name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's crappy experiments like this that give pseudo-science a bad name.There are so many confounding and uncontrolled variables that the results are meaningless.Did they repeat the experiment with the clean and dirty rooms swapped ? Were the subjects and experiment runners randomized ?
How many subjects ? Were the subjects sequestered or could they have smelled the Windex while waiting to participate ? Were there any other differences between the test rooms ? It 's crappy experiments like this that give pseudo-science a bad name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's crappy experiments like this that give pseudo-science a bad name.There are so many confounding and uncontrolled variables that the results are meaningless.Did they repeat the experiment with the clean and dirty rooms swapped?Were the subjects and experiment runners randomized?
How many subjects?Were the subjects sequestered or could they have smelled the Windex while waiting to participate?Were there any other differences between the test rooms?It's crappy experiments like this that give pseudo-science a bad name.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29892345</id>
	<title>Re:junk science</title>
	<author>tophermeyer</author>
	<datestamp>1256655120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More than that, one huge common criticism of American research is that most studies are conducted at Universities.  As a result, most research volunteers tend to be undergraduate college students.  This leads to selection biases for things like specific education level, socio-economic status, age, race, and to a lesser extent gender.  Of course, your right in that being at BYU many of these volunteers were likely Mormon.  This doesn't sound like representative data to me. <p>

Other obvious criticisms of their research methods aside, the way I read this study is basically "American college students are more likely to behave in a room that smells like it was cleaned".  Speaking as a former American college student, this isn't all that shocking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More than that , one huge common criticism of American research is that most studies are conducted at Universities .
As a result , most research volunteers tend to be undergraduate college students .
This leads to selection biases for things like specific education level , socio-economic status , age , race , and to a lesser extent gender .
Of course , your right in that being at BYU many of these volunteers were likely Mormon .
This does n't sound like representative data to me .
Other obvious criticisms of their research methods aside , the way I read this study is basically " American college students are more likely to behave in a room that smells like it was cleaned " .
Speaking as a former American college student , this is n't all that shocking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More than that, one huge common criticism of American research is that most studies are conducted at Universities.
As a result, most research volunteers tend to be undergraduate college students.
This leads to selection biases for things like specific education level, socio-economic status, age, race, and to a lesser extent gender.
Of course, your right in that being at BYU many of these volunteers were likely Mormon.
This doesn't sound like representative data to me.
Other obvious criticisms of their research methods aside, the way I read this study is basically "American college students are more likely to behave in a room that smells like it was cleaned".
Speaking as a former American college student, this isn't all that shocking.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877771</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901</id>
	<title>Makes sense</title>
	<author>bsDaemon</author>
	<datestamp>1256549640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>If a place smells like a moose just died in it, especially if its also visibly dirty, then I just sort of get the impression that it doesn't actually matter what I do in there.  On the other hand, when a place is spotless, smells lemony fresh and everything appears in order then I'm not going to be the one to put my feet on the coffee table, no matter how tempting it might be.  Smell ties into taste and is one of the more powerful senses we have, so it makes sense that it would play a large part in determining our impression of what is or isn't acceptable in a given location, every bit as much as it tells us what foods seem OK to eat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If a place smells like a moose just died in it , especially if its also visibly dirty , then I just sort of get the impression that it does n't actually matter what I do in there .
On the other hand , when a place is spotless , smells lemony fresh and everything appears in order then I 'm not going to be the one to put my feet on the coffee table , no matter how tempting it might be .
Smell ties into taste and is one of the more powerful senses we have , so it makes sense that it would play a large part in determining our impression of what is or is n't acceptable in a given location , every bit as much as it tells us what foods seem OK to eat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a place smells like a moose just died in it, especially if its also visibly dirty, then I just sort of get the impression that it doesn't actually matter what I do in there.
On the other hand, when a place is spotless, smells lemony fresh and everything appears in order then I'm not going to be the one to put my feet on the coffee table, no matter how tempting it might be.
Smell ties into taste and is one of the more powerful senses we have, so it makes sense that it would play a large part in determining our impression of what is or isn't acceptable in a given location, every bit as much as it tells us what foods seem OK to eat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882139</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256646300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This seems to coincide with the "broken windows" effect on crime:<br>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixing\_Broken\_Windows</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This seems to coincide with the " broken windows " effect on crime : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixing \ _Broken \ _Windows</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This seems to coincide with the "broken windows" effect on crime:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixing\_Broken\_Windows</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877111</id>
	<title>Re:If that is the case...</title>
	<author>Tubal-Cain</author>
	<datestamp>1256550420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A morgue.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A morgue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A morgue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877013</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877283</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256551080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From 2004-7, I was the sysadmin for a high school, and I noticed this effect with computer labs.</p><p>Lab A was filled with recent, fast computers [P4/2.8 with 512 MB RAM]. The computers were very fast and peppy...logging in took 30 seconds max, and applications started quickly. The computer lab was in a room with properly-working climate control and plenty of space for all the computers. It was originally 30, and I knocked it down to 29 to make it just a bit more spacious.</p><p>Lab B was filled with Celeron 1.2s with 128 MB of RAM. They were running XP when I showed up, and I switched them to 2000 to help with speed. Even with only Windows 2000, they ran like molasses in Antarctica. Logging into Windows would take minutes, launching a browser another few minutes...you get the picture. The lab was crammed into a windowless storage room without nearly enough climate control--on winter days, when the water chiller was shut off, the lab heated up to 80+F and became unbearable. Originally 30 stations when I showed up, I whittled it down to 24--they took up less space, 6 of them had their motherboards go kaput, and class-size analysis showed 24 seats adequate for most of the classes in the school. The only reason that damn lab existed was because the school foundation matched funding for a lab in 1997...</p><p>Lab A was treated with respect. When I went in there at the end of the school day, I had only to close the windows and blinds. Everything was kept quite orderly.</p><p>Lab B...not so much. It looked almost like a riot happened in there, with encrusted Jolly Ranchers stuck to computers, students snapping the CD trays off while impatiently waiting for Web pages to load, and students removing balls from mice. Even teachers treated that lab like crap.</p><p>Show them respect with working equipment, and they're more likely to respect it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From 2004-7 , I was the sysadmin for a high school , and I noticed this effect with computer labs.Lab A was filled with recent , fast computers [ P4/2.8 with 512 MB RAM ] .
The computers were very fast and peppy...logging in took 30 seconds max , and applications started quickly .
The computer lab was in a room with properly-working climate control and plenty of space for all the computers .
It was originally 30 , and I knocked it down to 29 to make it just a bit more spacious.Lab B was filled with Celeron 1.2s with 128 MB of RAM .
They were running XP when I showed up , and I switched them to 2000 to help with speed .
Even with only Windows 2000 , they ran like molasses in Antarctica .
Logging into Windows would take minutes , launching a browser another few minutes...you get the picture .
The lab was crammed into a windowless storage room without nearly enough climate control--on winter days , when the water chiller was shut off , the lab heated up to 80 + F and became unbearable .
Originally 30 stations when I showed up , I whittled it down to 24--they took up less space , 6 of them had their motherboards go kaput , and class-size analysis showed 24 seats adequate for most of the classes in the school .
The only reason that damn lab existed was because the school foundation matched funding for a lab in 1997...Lab A was treated with respect .
When I went in there at the end of the school day , I had only to close the windows and blinds .
Everything was kept quite orderly.Lab B...not so much .
It looked almost like a riot happened in there , with encrusted Jolly Ranchers stuck to computers , students snapping the CD trays off while impatiently waiting for Web pages to load , and students removing balls from mice .
Even teachers treated that lab like crap.Show them respect with working equipment , and they 're more likely to respect it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From 2004-7, I was the sysadmin for a high school, and I noticed this effect with computer labs.Lab A was filled with recent, fast computers [P4/2.8 with 512 MB RAM].
The computers were very fast and peppy...logging in took 30 seconds max, and applications started quickly.
The computer lab was in a room with properly-working climate control and plenty of space for all the computers.
It was originally 30, and I knocked it down to 29 to make it just a bit more spacious.Lab B was filled with Celeron 1.2s with 128 MB of RAM.
They were running XP when I showed up, and I switched them to 2000 to help with speed.
Even with only Windows 2000, they ran like molasses in Antarctica.
Logging into Windows would take minutes, launching a browser another few minutes...you get the picture.
The lab was crammed into a windowless storage room without nearly enough climate control--on winter days, when the water chiller was shut off, the lab heated up to 80+F and became unbearable.
Originally 30 stations when I showed up, I whittled it down to 24--they took up less space, 6 of them had their motherboards go kaput, and class-size analysis showed 24 seats adequate for most of the classes in the school.
The only reason that damn lab existed was because the school foundation matched funding for a lab in 1997...Lab A was treated with respect.
When I went in there at the end of the school day, I had only to close the windows and blinds.
Everything was kept quite orderly.Lab B...not so much.
It looked almost like a riot happened in there, with encrusted Jolly Ranchers stuck to computers, students snapping the CD trays off while impatiently waiting for Web pages to load, and students removing balls from mice.
Even teachers treated that lab like crap.Show them respect with working equipment, and they're more likely to respect it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882725</id>
	<title>My Big Fat Greek Wedding</title>
	<author>Jason Levine</author>
	<datestamp>1256652480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is my first thought the dad from My Big Fat Greek Wedding?  The one who thought Windex cured everything.  Got a sore elbow? Dip it in Windex.  Feet ache?  Soak them in Windex.  Got a sore throat?  Well, I'd rather not see that cure applied.  Moral compass on the fritz?  Apply a little Windex and you're good to go!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is my first thought the dad from My Big Fat Greek Wedding ?
The one who thought Windex cured everything .
Got a sore elbow ?
Dip it in Windex .
Feet ache ?
Soak them in Windex .
Got a sore throat ?
Well , I 'd rather not see that cure applied .
Moral compass on the fritz ?
Apply a little Windex and you 're good to go !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is my first thought the dad from My Big Fat Greek Wedding?
The one who thought Windex cured everything.
Got a sore elbow?
Dip it in Windex.
Feet ache?
Soak them in Windex.
Got a sore throat?
Well, I'd rather not see that cure applied.
Moral compass on the fritz?
Apply a little Windex and you're good to go!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882223</id>
	<title>Re:RTFA!</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1256648100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>and the true tragedy is that they occupy the position of kingmaker in the political system</p></div></blockquote><p>Yup.  Those who advocate proportional representation should bear that example in mind.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and the true tragedy is that they occupy the position of kingmaker in the political systemYup .
Those who advocate proportional representation should bear that example in mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and the true tragedy is that they occupy the position of kingmaker in the political systemYup.
Those who advocate proportional representation should bear that example in mind.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880759</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877849</id>
	<title>Re:This is BS</title>
	<author>R2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1256553360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I call bs...whenever an attractive woman walks by smelling like she just stepped out of the shower I have only immoral thoughts."</p><p>Funny - when an attractive woman walks by who smells like she just came from getting laid, my thoughts are...more immoral.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I call bs...whenever an attractive woman walks by smelling like she just stepped out of the shower I have only immoral thoughts .
" Funny - when an attractive woman walks by who smells like she just came from getting laid , my thoughts are...more immoral .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I call bs...whenever an attractive woman walks by smelling like she just stepped out of the shower I have only immoral thoughts.
"Funny - when an attractive woman walks by who smells like she just came from getting laid, my thoughts are...more immoral.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876837</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877227</id>
	<title>Clean smells? Windex?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256550840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's get this straight. Windex typically reeks of ammonia. And so do public elevators where winos have urinated.<br>
&nbsp; <br>A coincidence? A paradox? Or, are the guys at Brigham Young sniffing gold spraypaint trying to come up with new ideas? Hmmmmm...?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's get this straight .
Windex typically reeks of ammonia .
And so do public elevators where winos have urinated .
  A coincidence ?
A paradox ?
Or , are the guys at Brigham Young sniffing gold spraypaint trying to come up with new ideas ?
Hmmmmm... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's get this straight.
Windex typically reeks of ammonia.
And so do public elevators where winos have urinated.
  A coincidence?
A paradox?
Or, are the guys at Brigham Young sniffing gold spraypaint trying to come up with new ideas?
Hmmmmm...?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877351</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>TorKlingberg</author>
	<datestamp>1256551260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>For that reason, I take this to be further evidence that most people operate on a sort of auto-pilot.</p></div><p>It is well-known that people aren't particularly rational and most things we do are not really conscious decisions.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For that reason , I take this to be further evidence that most people operate on a sort of auto-pilot.It is well-known that people are n't particularly rational and most things we do are not really conscious decisions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For that reason, I take this to be further evidence that most people operate on a sort of auto-pilot.It is well-known that people aren't particularly rational and most things we do are not really conscious decisions.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877129</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877293</id>
	<title>Re:Fish smells like yo mama is horny again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256551080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I take it you are all out of Windex?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I take it you are all out of Windex ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I take it you are all out of Windex?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881269</id>
	<title>Perfume</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256586840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Letterman and Governor sex scandals were precipitated by the fact that they work in environments that are slathered in woman's perfume. Some of the ingredients in them are synthesized smells of clean anus, which seems to drive these guys into ill-considered behavior. The pharmaceutical companies are lobbying and arm-twisting like crazy to keep that out of the media.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Letterman and Governor sex scandals were precipitated by the fact that they work in environments that are slathered in woman 's perfume .
Some of the ingredients in them are synthesized smells of clean anus , which seems to drive these guys into ill-considered behavior .
The pharmaceutical companies are lobbying and arm-twisting like crazy to keep that out of the media .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Letterman and Governor sex scandals were precipitated by the fact that they work in environments that are slathered in woman's perfume.
Some of the ingredients in them are synthesized smells of clean anus, which seems to drive these guys into ill-considered behavior.
The pharmaceutical companies are lobbying and arm-twisting like crazy to keep that out of the media.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29895605</id>
	<title>Re:Clean smells? Windex?</title>
	<author>Tuoqui</author>
	<datestamp>1256737080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually the summary specifically says citrus scents... Presumably they were using a citrus smelling windex rather thanthe plain old blue nasty smelling stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually the summary specifically says citrus scents... Presumably they were using a citrus smelling windex rather thanthe plain old blue nasty smelling stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually the summary specifically says citrus scents... Presumably they were using a citrus smelling windex rather thanthe plain old blue nasty smelling stuff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877935</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>R2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1256553720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"If scent made such a noticable difference, then you can safely say that these folks were not terribly committed to doing the Right Thing. They needed an external motivation. That's hardly as good as doing the best you can, all the time, because you seriously believe in and want to adhere to sound, timeless principles that have a solid ethical or moral foundation. "</p><p>That sounds like the distinction between Perfect and Imperfect Contrition in the Catholic Catechism.  Perfect Contrition is when you are repentant of your sins because you love God and are sorry you have broken His agreement with you.  Imperfect Contrition is when you are repentant because you don't want to go to Hell.</p><p>Guess what - either gets you into Heaven.  Likewise, I'm not sure anyone should care WHY someone does the right thing, as long as they do it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" If scent made such a noticable difference , then you can safely say that these folks were not terribly committed to doing the Right Thing .
They needed an external motivation .
That 's hardly as good as doing the best you can , all the time , because you seriously believe in and want to adhere to sound , timeless principles that have a solid ethical or moral foundation .
" That sounds like the distinction between Perfect and Imperfect Contrition in the Catholic Catechism .
Perfect Contrition is when you are repentant of your sins because you love God and are sorry you have broken His agreement with you .
Imperfect Contrition is when you are repentant because you do n't want to go to Hell.Guess what - either gets you into Heaven .
Likewise , I 'm not sure anyone should care WHY someone does the right thing , as long as they do it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"If scent made such a noticable difference, then you can safely say that these folks were not terribly committed to doing the Right Thing.
They needed an external motivation.
That's hardly as good as doing the best you can, all the time, because you seriously believe in and want to adhere to sound, timeless principles that have a solid ethical or moral foundation.
"That sounds like the distinction between Perfect and Imperfect Contrition in the Catholic Catechism.
Perfect Contrition is when you are repentant of your sins because you love God and are sorry you have broken His agreement with you.
Imperfect Contrition is when you are repentant because you don't want to go to Hell.Guess what - either gets you into Heaven.
Likewise, I'm not sure anyone should care WHY someone does the right thing, as long as they do it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877129</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879859</id>
	<title>Smell is powerful... but</title>
	<author>redfire111</author>
	<datestamp>1256566860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I can't motivate to go to the pool to swim I open a bottle of chlorine and get a wiff of it (not like face in the bottle or anyting), it always reminds me how much I like swimming and how good it will feel if I get my stuff together and go.

I think it is it a different thing to encourage a certain kind of behavior that you already want to do than discouraging stealing or slacking off at work.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I ca n't motivate to go to the pool to swim I open a bottle of chlorine and get a wiff of it ( not like face in the bottle or anyting ) , it always reminds me how much I like swimming and how good it will feel if I get my stuff together and go .
I think it is it a different thing to encourage a certain kind of behavior that you already want to do than discouraging stealing or slacking off at work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I can't motivate to go to the pool to swim I open a bottle of chlorine and get a wiff of it (not like face in the bottle or anyting), it always reminds me how much I like swimming and how good it will feel if I get my stuff together and go.
I think it is it a different thing to encourage a certain kind of behavior that you already want to do than discouraging stealing or slacking off at work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879519</id>
	<title>Re:But...</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1256563800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>In terms of bank robbery, robbing a bank is highly ethical. The robber gets some money, that money gets spent, and a large trickle-down impacts the local economy. The bank is insured so they don't lose any money. The customers and tellers get some excitement and a story to tell for years. "Hey, did I ever tell you about the time I was in a bank robbery?</i></p><p>I guess you've never heard of post traumatic stress? Or people getting killed in botched bank robberies? Or the fact that the money does come from somewhere. Bank insurance premiums go up, security is tightened, and they pass on the costs to customers.</p><p>Anything can be argued, but this argument doesn't stand up to any kind of rational scrutiny.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In terms of bank robbery , robbing a bank is highly ethical .
The robber gets some money , that money gets spent , and a large trickle-down impacts the local economy .
The bank is insured so they do n't lose any money .
The customers and tellers get some excitement and a story to tell for years .
" Hey , did I ever tell you about the time I was in a bank robbery ? I guess you 've never heard of post traumatic stress ?
Or people getting killed in botched bank robberies ?
Or the fact that the money does come from somewhere .
Bank insurance premiums go up , security is tightened , and they pass on the costs to customers.Anything can be argued , but this argument does n't stand up to any kind of rational scrutiny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In terms of bank robbery, robbing a bank is highly ethical.
The robber gets some money, that money gets spent, and a large trickle-down impacts the local economy.
The bank is insured so they don't lose any money.
The customers and tellers get some excitement and a story to tell for years.
"Hey, did I ever tell you about the time I was in a bank robbery?I guess you've never heard of post traumatic stress?
Or people getting killed in botched bank robberies?
Or the fact that the money does come from somewhere.
Bank insurance premiums go up, security is tightened, and they pass on the costs to customers.Anything can be argued, but this argument doesn't stand up to any kind of rational scrutiny.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880665</id>
	<title>Re:Is this a joke?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256576760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lead author or lead scientist? There's a difference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lead author or lead scientist ?
There 's a difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lead author or lead scientist?
There's a difference.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29883007</id>
	<title>Re:This is BS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256654160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I call bs...whenever an attractive woman walks by smelling like she just stepped out of the shower I have only immoral thoughts.</i></p><p>Really?  That's extremely weird.  When that happens to me I think about how much fun it would be to chat her up, get her naked and have wildly good sex with her.</p><p>What kind of immoral thoughts do you have?  Do you feel sudden urges to restrict people's freedom of expression?  Do you want to ban abortion?  Or deprive people of life, liberty or property without due process of law?</p><p>And how on earth does an attractive women stimulate these thoughts?  Or are they of the all-too-common immoral variety that she should be stoned to death for being more autonomous than you are comfortable with?</p><p>It is deeply sad that an attractive woman should stimulate immoral thoughts, rather than healthy and moral sexual desire.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I call bs...whenever an attractive woman walks by smelling like she just stepped out of the shower I have only immoral thoughts.Really ?
That 's extremely weird .
When that happens to me I think about how much fun it would be to chat her up , get her naked and have wildly good sex with her.What kind of immoral thoughts do you have ?
Do you feel sudden urges to restrict people 's freedom of expression ?
Do you want to ban abortion ?
Or deprive people of life , liberty or property without due process of law ? And how on earth does an attractive women stimulate these thoughts ?
Or are they of the all-too-common immoral variety that she should be stoned to death for being more autonomous than you are comfortable with ? It is deeply sad that an attractive woman should stimulate immoral thoughts , rather than healthy and moral sexual desire .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call bs...whenever an attractive woman walks by smelling like she just stepped out of the shower I have only immoral thoughts.Really?
That's extremely weird.
When that happens to me I think about how much fun it would be to chat her up, get her naked and have wildly good sex with her.What kind of immoral thoughts do you have?
Do you feel sudden urges to restrict people's freedom of expression?
Do you want to ban abortion?
Or deprive people of life, liberty or property without due process of law?And how on earth does an attractive women stimulate these thoughts?
Or are they of the all-too-common immoral variety that she should be stoned to death for being more autonomous than you are comfortable with?It is deeply sad that an attractive woman should stimulate immoral thoughts, rather than healthy and moral sexual desire.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876837</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877395</id>
	<title>It's because they have it backwards</title>
	<author>dmomo</author>
	<datestamp>1256551500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Correlation/Causation and all that.  The point is... unethical behavior is what leads to the bad smells.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Correlation/Causation and all that .
The point is... unethical behavior is what leads to the bad smells .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correlation/Causation and all that.
The point is... unethical behavior is what leads to the bad smells.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881903</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1256642040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OT:</p><p>"You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein</p><p>Switzerland disproves that nicely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OT : " You can not simultaneously prevent and prepare for war .
" -- Albert EinsteinSwitzerland disproves that nicely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OT:"You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war.
" -- Albert EinsteinSwitzerland disproves that nicely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877113</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879427</id>
	<title>Re:But...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1256563140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In that case a nice mix of pulverized fresh dollar bills, gun polish, a hint of luxurious shoe or marble polish, in a base of your favorite alcoholic drink, should help.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>If you like to go for more action, one can add a bit of blood, sweat, tears and gunpowder.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In that case a nice mix of pulverized fresh dollar bills , gun polish , a hint of luxurious shoe or marble polish , in a base of your favorite alcoholic drink , should help .
: ) If you like to go for more action , one can add a bit of blood , sweat , tears and gunpowder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In that case a nice mix of pulverized fresh dollar bills, gun polish, a hint of luxurious shoe or marble polish, in a base of your favorite alcoholic drink, should help.
:)If you like to go for more action, one can add a bit of blood, sweat, tears and gunpowder.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878139</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>P0ltergeist333</author>
	<datestamp>1256554620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well said. One of the things that troubled me about the article is that it didn't state whether the participants were assigned a room or chose the room. Kind of along the lines of your post, could it be that ethical people choose to be in cleaner environments?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well said .
One of the things that troubled me about the article is that it did n't state whether the participants were assigned a room or chose the room .
Kind of along the lines of your post , could it be that ethical people choose to be in cleaner environments ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well said.
One of the things that troubled me about the article is that it didn't state whether the participants were assigned a room or chose the room.
Kind of along the lines of your post, could it be that ethical people choose to be in cleaner environments?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876875</id>
	<title>Dirty D!</title>
	<author>Baby Duck</author>
	<datestamp>1256549520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"I'm Dirty D, damnit! I just need to be diiiirty!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 'm Dirty D , damnit !
I just need to be diiiirty !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I'm Dirty D, damnit!
I just need to be diiiirty!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876861</id>
	<title>But...</title>
	<author>brian0918</author>
	<datestamp>1256549520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But what if the task I'm assigned to do is to rob a bank? Does the spritz of Windex make my action ethical?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But what if the task I 'm assigned to do is to rob a bank ?
Does the spritz of Windex make my action ethical ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But what if the task I'm assigned to do is to rob a bank?
Does the spritz of Windex make my action ethical?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879685</id>
	<title>Re:Brigham Young University?</title>
	<author>Whiteox</author>
	<datestamp>1256565240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...the Book of Mormon's ludicrous ficitonal pre-Colombian American History is valid?</p> </div><p>You didn't comprehend the article did you?<br>All he is saying is that there are examples already in archaeology of those elements mentioned in the Book of Mormon. He's not actively searching and I doubt he would be allowed to by LDS policy which is hinted at in the rest of the article.</p><p>No Cheetos for you!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...the Book of Mormon 's ludicrous ficitonal pre-Colombian American History is valid ?
You did n't comprehend the article did you ? All he is saying is that there are examples already in archaeology of those elements mentioned in the Book of Mormon .
He 's not actively searching and I doubt he would be allowed to by LDS policy which is hinted at in the rest of the article.No Cheetos for you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...the Book of Mormon's ludicrous ficitonal pre-Colombian American History is valid?
You didn't comprehend the article did you?All he is saying is that there are examples already in archaeology of those elements mentioned in the Book of Mormon.
He's not actively searching and I doubt he would be allowed to by LDS policy which is hinted at in the rest of the article.No Cheetos for you!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877233</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879907</id>
	<title>Re:RTFA!</title>
	<author>JoshuaZ</author>
	<datestamp>1256567280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>This might sound funny but that's very close to what some ultra-Orthodox Jews have been using in areas of Israel where they think that women aren't dressed modestly enough, or are too loud, or have perfume, or are walking down the wrong side of the street. Most common substances is pepper spray which doesn't smell so bad if you aren't on the receiving end. Boiling water and rocks have also been used. This is especially common in Meah Shearim, an ultra-Orthodox neighborhood in Jerusalem. See for example <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3795237,00.html" title="ynetnews.com">http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3795237,00.html</a> [ynetnews.com] one of the very few cases where the police have actually tried to arrest the religious fanatics in question.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This might sound funny but that 's very close to what some ultra-Orthodox Jews have been using in areas of Israel where they think that women are n't dressed modestly enough , or are too loud , or have perfume , or are walking down the wrong side of the street .
Most common substances is pepper spray which does n't smell so bad if you are n't on the receiving end .
Boiling water and rocks have also been used .
This is especially common in Meah Shearim , an ultra-Orthodox neighborhood in Jerusalem .
See for example http : //www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3795237,00.html [ ynetnews.com ] one of the very few cases where the police have actually tried to arrest the religious fanatics in question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This might sound funny but that's very close to what some ultra-Orthodox Jews have been using in areas of Israel where they think that women aren't dressed modestly enough, or are too loud, or have perfume, or are walking down the wrong side of the street.
Most common substances is pepper spray which doesn't smell so bad if you aren't on the receiving end.
Boiling water and rocks have also been used.
This is especially common in Meah Shearim, an ultra-Orthodox neighborhood in Jerusalem.
See for example http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3795237,00.html [ynetnews.com] one of the very few cases where the police have actually tried to arrest the religious fanatics in question.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878349</id>
	<title>Second hand cars</title>
	<author>DavMz</author>
	<datestamp>1256555640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course smell matters. Ask any car seller why they have <a href="http://www.lanescarproducts.com/newcarscent.html" title="lanescarproducts.com" rel="nofollow">sprays of new cars scents</a> [lanescarproducts.com]. Hey, a car that smells like new will sell for a higher price.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course smell matters .
Ask any car seller why they have sprays of new cars scents [ lanescarproducts.com ] .
Hey , a car that smells like new will sell for a higher price .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course smell matters.
Ask any car seller why they have sprays of new cars scents [lanescarproducts.com].
Hey, a car that smells like new will sell for a higher price.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881869</id>
	<title>Stand on Zanzibar, Hugo winner 1969</title>
	<author>catman</author>
	<datestamp>1256641260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., I didn't read TFA - but the summary reminded me of this book by John Brunner. IIRC he suggested that a (hypothetical) pheromone would help people cope with the stress of overpopulation, dropping the US murder rate to very low levels, among other effects<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is /. , I did n't read TFA - but the summary reminded me of this book by John Brunner .
IIRC he suggested that a ( hypothetical ) pheromone would help people cope with the stress of overpopulation , dropping the US murder rate to very low levels , among other effects .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is /., I didn't read TFA - but the summary reminded me of this book by John Brunner.
IIRC he suggested that a (hypothetical) pheromone would help people cope with the stress of overpopulation, dropping the US murder rate to very low levels, among other effects ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877343</id>
	<title>Re:If that is the case...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256551260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It smells like kosher food, if you know what I mean.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It smells like kosher food , if you know what I mean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It smells like kosher food, if you know what I mean.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877013</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29883289</id>
	<title>The smell of shit...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256655660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...promotes homosexual behaviour.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...promotes homosexual behaviour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...promotes homosexual behaviour.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877367</id>
	<title>This study brought to you by Windex.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256551320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Windex, not only cleans your house, but now cleans up your life!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Windex , not only cleans your house , but now cleans up your life !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Windex, not only cleans your house, but now cleans up your life!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878547</id>
	<title>Re:Happiness</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1256557200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, it depends on the store.  In a book store, for example, I'd much rather smell old books than cleaning fluid.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it depends on the store .
In a book store , for example , I 'd much rather smell old books than cleaning fluid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it depends on the store.
In a book store, for example, I'd much rather smell old books than cleaning fluid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878015</id>
	<title>Re:But...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256554020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It depends on which of the ethical schools you're subscribing to.</p><p>Mill's utilitarianism model states that the best choice is the one that provides the most benefit for the most people. In terms of bank robbery, robbing a bank is highly ethical. The robber gets some money, that money gets spent, and a large trickle-down impacts the local economy. The bank is insured so they don't lose any money. The customers and tellers get some excitement and a story to tell for years. "Hey, did I ever tell you about the time I was in a bank robbery?"</p><p>Kant's formal duty-based ethics means that you have to follow courses of action that are acceptable as universal principles for everyone to follow. Further, it is your INTENTION to follow the mores rather than your actions. Good will is the desire and intention to do one's duty. If your duty is to rob a bank, then robbing a bank is highly ethical. If they didn't expect you to rob it, they wouldn't spend all that time and money on robbery countermeasures.</p><p>Locke's rights-based ethics gives you rights based solely by your existence. The maximum possible liberty and happiness are fundamental; all other rights flow out of these basic ones. You are restricting the rights of the robbed in the bank, but as long as you are not taking their personal possessions (with the temporary exception of cell phones) you aren't treading on their rights significantly.</p><p>Finally, Aristotle's virtue ethics states that the goodness of an act or object depends on its function. A "good" knife cuts well; a "good" chair is comfy. So, a "good" bank robber is one that robs banks.</p><p>Reference:<br>Andrews, Gordon. Canadian Professional Engineering and Geoscience: Practice and Ethics. Thomson Nelson, 2005. (pp. 126 - 130)</p><p>(It didn't seem right to not specify a source on this one.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It depends on which of the ethical schools you 're subscribing to.Mill 's utilitarianism model states that the best choice is the one that provides the most benefit for the most people .
In terms of bank robbery , robbing a bank is highly ethical .
The robber gets some money , that money gets spent , and a large trickle-down impacts the local economy .
The bank is insured so they do n't lose any money .
The customers and tellers get some excitement and a story to tell for years .
" Hey , did I ever tell you about the time I was in a bank robbery ?
" Kant 's formal duty-based ethics means that you have to follow courses of action that are acceptable as universal principles for everyone to follow .
Further , it is your INTENTION to follow the mores rather than your actions .
Good will is the desire and intention to do one 's duty .
If your duty is to rob a bank , then robbing a bank is highly ethical .
If they did n't expect you to rob it , they would n't spend all that time and money on robbery countermeasures.Locke 's rights-based ethics gives you rights based solely by your existence .
The maximum possible liberty and happiness are fundamental ; all other rights flow out of these basic ones .
You are restricting the rights of the robbed in the bank , but as long as you are not taking their personal possessions ( with the temporary exception of cell phones ) you are n't treading on their rights significantly.Finally , Aristotle 's virtue ethics states that the goodness of an act or object depends on its function .
A " good " knife cuts well ; a " good " chair is comfy .
So , a " good " bank robber is one that robs banks.Reference : Andrews , Gordon .
Canadian Professional Engineering and Geoscience : Practice and Ethics .
Thomson Nelson , 2005 .
( pp. 126 - 130 ) ( It did n't seem right to not specify a source on this one .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It depends on which of the ethical schools you're subscribing to.Mill's utilitarianism model states that the best choice is the one that provides the most benefit for the most people.
In terms of bank robbery, robbing a bank is highly ethical.
The robber gets some money, that money gets spent, and a large trickle-down impacts the local economy.
The bank is insured so they don't lose any money.
The customers and tellers get some excitement and a story to tell for years.
"Hey, did I ever tell you about the time I was in a bank robbery?
"Kant's formal duty-based ethics means that you have to follow courses of action that are acceptable as universal principles for everyone to follow.
Further, it is your INTENTION to follow the mores rather than your actions.
Good will is the desire and intention to do one's duty.
If your duty is to rob a bank, then robbing a bank is highly ethical.
If they didn't expect you to rob it, they wouldn't spend all that time and money on robbery countermeasures.Locke's rights-based ethics gives you rights based solely by your existence.
The maximum possible liberty and happiness are fundamental; all other rights flow out of these basic ones.
You are restricting the rights of the robbed in the bank, but as long as you are not taking their personal possessions (with the temporary exception of cell phones) you aren't treading on their rights significantly.Finally, Aristotle's virtue ethics states that the goodness of an act or object depends on its function.
A "good" knife cuts well; a "good" chair is comfy.
So, a "good" bank robber is one that robs banks.Reference:Andrews, Gordon.
Canadian Professional Engineering and Geoscience: Practice and Ethics.
Thomson Nelson, 2005.
(pp. 126 - 130)(It didn't seem right to not specify a source on this one.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29884141</id>
	<title>Re:But...</title>
	<author>skeeto</author>
	<datestamp>1256659860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Considering that the same book promotes slavery and rape (Numbers 31), human trafficking (Exodus 21:7), killing people who don't share your religious beliefs (Exodus 35:2), it can hardly be considered any sort of ethical guide. We have much better systems today.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering that the same book promotes slavery and rape ( Numbers 31 ) , human trafficking ( Exodus 21 : 7 ) , killing people who do n't share your religious beliefs ( Exodus 35 : 2 ) , it can hardly be considered any sort of ethical guide .
We have much better systems today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering that the same book promotes slavery and rape (Numbers 31), human trafficking (Exodus 21:7), killing people who don't share your religious beliefs (Exodus 35:2), it can hardly be considered any sort of ethical guide.
We have much better systems today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877079</id>
	<title>... next to godliness</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1256550300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cleanliness really IS next to godliness.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cleanliness really IS next to godliness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cleanliness really IS next to godliness.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879485</id>
	<title>Re:glamour shots?</title>
	<author>penguinchris</author>
	<datestamp>1256563500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a trend in corporate/news/etc photography, to provide photo illustration that's interesting and creative rather than a boring portrait. Check out <a href="http://www.strobist.blogspot.com/" title="blogspot.com">Strobist</a> [blogspot.com], which in the past couple of years has greatly influenced this kind of photography.</p><p>The real answer, though, is this - BYU probably has a staff photographer or two to provide publicity photos. Their assignments probably don't specify to do anything other than a simple portrait, which I'm sure they do - but then since they're bored they also try stuff like this, which the PR person in charge sees and realizes is a lot more interesting and therefore makes the university seem more interesting. And whether that works or not for nerds on slashdot is irrelevant - the university obviously wants a positive and interesting public image, and good web design and photography greatly help toward that goal despite having nothing to do with the school's academics or research.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a trend in corporate/news/etc photography , to provide photo illustration that 's interesting and creative rather than a boring portrait .
Check out Strobist [ blogspot.com ] , which in the past couple of years has greatly influenced this kind of photography.The real answer , though , is this - BYU probably has a staff photographer or two to provide publicity photos .
Their assignments probably do n't specify to do anything other than a simple portrait , which I 'm sure they do - but then since they 're bored they also try stuff like this , which the PR person in charge sees and realizes is a lot more interesting and therefore makes the university seem more interesting .
And whether that works or not for nerds on slashdot is irrelevant - the university obviously wants a positive and interesting public image , and good web design and photography greatly help toward that goal despite having nothing to do with the school 's academics or research .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a trend in corporate/news/etc photography, to provide photo illustration that's interesting and creative rather than a boring portrait.
Check out Strobist [blogspot.com], which in the past couple of years has greatly influenced this kind of photography.The real answer, though, is this - BYU probably has a staff photographer or two to provide publicity photos.
Their assignments probably don't specify to do anything other than a simple portrait, which I'm sure they do - but then since they're bored they also try stuff like this, which the PR person in charge sees and realizes is a lot more interesting and therefore makes the university seem more interesting.
And whether that works or not for nerds on slashdot is irrelevant - the university obviously wants a positive and interesting public image, and good web design and photography greatly help toward that goal despite having nothing to do with the school's academics or research.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877169</id>
	<title>Re:Crappy experiment</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256550600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not neccessarily. If science is the testing of hypotheses through carefully conducted and controlled experiments, you must acknowledge that those hypotheses must come from somewhere - and why shouldn't that be quick and dirty experiments? I'd rule out "just doing it right the first time" - because the conclusion in this case seems so surprising that nobody would ever have deemed it important enough to spend a whole controlled study on.</p><p>Of course, like the Slashdot poll, "if you use this result for anything important, you're insane". But some more trials might be in order.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not neccessarily .
If science is the testing of hypotheses through carefully conducted and controlled experiments , you must acknowledge that those hypotheses must come from somewhere - and why should n't that be quick and dirty experiments ?
I 'd rule out " just doing it right the first time " - because the conclusion in this case seems so surprising that nobody would ever have deemed it important enough to spend a whole controlled study on.Of course , like the Slashdot poll , " if you use this result for anything important , you 're insane " .
But some more trials might be in order .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not neccessarily.
If science is the testing of hypotheses through carefully conducted and controlled experiments, you must acknowledge that those hypotheses must come from somewhere - and why shouldn't that be quick and dirty experiments?
I'd rule out "just doing it right the first time" - because the conclusion in this case seems so surprising that nobody would ever have deemed it important enough to spend a whole controlled study on.Of course, like the Slashdot poll, "if you use this result for anything important, you're insane".
But some more trials might be in order.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877315</id>
	<title>Re:This is BS</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1256551140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I call bs...whenever an attractive woman walks by smelling like she just stepped out of the shower I have only immoral thoughts.</p></div><p>The summary is talking about ethics. They said nothing about moral relativity.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I call bs...whenever an attractive woman walks by smelling like she just stepped out of the shower I have only immoral thoughts.The summary is talking about ethics .
They said nothing about moral relativity .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call bs...whenever an attractive woman walks by smelling like she just stepped out of the shower I have only immoral thoughts.The summary is talking about ethics.
They said nothing about moral relativity.
:)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876837</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877233</id>
	<title>Brigham Young University?</title>
	<author>FlyingSquidStudios</author>
	<datestamp>1256550900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The same Brigham Young University that has an article about how one of their archaeologists has proven the Book of Mormon's ludicrous ficitonal pre-Colombian American History is valid?

<a href="http://newsnet.byu.edu/story.cfm/50535" title="byu.edu" rel="nofollow">http://newsnet.byu.edu/story.cfm/50535</a> [byu.edu]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The same Brigham Young University that has an article about how one of their archaeologists has proven the Book of Mormon 's ludicrous ficitonal pre-Colombian American History is valid ?
http : //newsnet.byu.edu/story.cfm/50535 [ byu.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The same Brigham Young University that has an article about how one of their archaeologists has proven the Book of Mormon's ludicrous ficitonal pre-Colombian American History is valid?
http://newsnet.byu.edu/story.cfm/50535 [byu.edu]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29883329</id>
	<title>Re:Crappy experiment</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256655960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It's crappy experiments like this that give pseudo-science <i>a bad name</i>.</p></div></blockquote><p>As opposed to rigorous pseudo-science?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's crappy experiments like this that give pseudo-science a bad name.As opposed to rigorous pseudo-science ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's crappy experiments like this that give pseudo-science a bad name.As opposed to rigorous pseudo-science?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876893</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877849
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879039
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877777
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879907
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882061
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880665
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881631
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879907
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878547
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880845
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881901
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877013
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877343
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876785
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877227
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29895605
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29884141
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877677
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880215
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880175
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879519
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879473
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877169
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876785
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877227
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29887313
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877013
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877225
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878145
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878989
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879485
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29885089
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878327
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879507
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878497
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877513
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877129
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29883499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877129
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877233
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878099
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29883329
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877545
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877391
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879907
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29883415
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879907
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881621
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879427
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29892345
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877129
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882151
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879907
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882223
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877957
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879907
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29884655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29883007
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881505
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878345
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29883483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877129
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877351
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879357
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877013
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877111
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_1834248_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879583
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877397
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877013
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877111
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877343
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877225
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876881
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877217
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29883329
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877169
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29887313
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29885089
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877571
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879507
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877545
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877677
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880215
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877899
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877367
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876901
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878051
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879039
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878145
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878345
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29883483
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877113
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879583
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878483
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881903
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877283
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882139
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877129
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877351
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29883499
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878069
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882655
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877935
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878139
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878099
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879119
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877233
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879685
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876863
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877883
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876865
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877957
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878989
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878327
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878547
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882165
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876837
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877849
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877095
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879907
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880759
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882223
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29883415
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882213
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29884655
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881621
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882061
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29883007
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877315
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876785
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877227
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877971
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29895605
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877575
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876883
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877783
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879485
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877037
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877391
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877777
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877771
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29892345
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877513
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878497
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881631
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876861
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29878015
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880845
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879359
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29884141
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879473
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879519
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879219
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881901
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29881505
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879357
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29879427
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29882151
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29876807
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877043
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880175
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877293
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_1834248.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29877051
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_1834248.29880665
</commentlist>
</conversation>
