<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_22_1232225</id>
	<title>Yahoo Offered Lap Dances At Hack Event</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1256223000000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Fotograf writes <i>"Yahoo's latest embarrassment seems like a sign that the company is just trying too hard to be cool. The latest debacle is earning the company some additional publicity.  After Yahoo hosted Taiwan Open Hack Day, a special event for engineers and developers that was held last weekend, a series of photos found their way onto the internet &mdash; as ill-thought out decisions often do. <a href="http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=16570">Yahoo offered lap dances to the attendees</a> of the hack event. Since the pictures have come out the company has decided to apologize."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fotograf writes " Yahoo 's latest embarrassment seems like a sign that the company is just trying too hard to be cool .
The latest debacle is earning the company some additional publicity .
After Yahoo hosted Taiwan Open Hack Day , a special event for engineers and developers that was held last weekend , a series of photos found their way onto the internet    as ill-thought out decisions often do .
Yahoo offered lap dances to the attendees of the hack event .
Since the pictures have come out the company has decided to apologize .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fotograf writes "Yahoo's latest embarrassment seems like a sign that the company is just trying too hard to be cool.
The latest debacle is earning the company some additional publicity.
After Yahoo hosted Taiwan Open Hack Day, a special event for engineers and developers that was held last weekend, a series of photos found their way onto the internet — as ill-thought out decisions often do.
Yahoo offered lap dances to the attendees of the hack event.
Since the pictures have come out the company has decided to apologize.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835961</id>
	<title>damn right, they should apologize!</title>
	<author>macbeth66</author>
	<datestamp>1256229780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I did NOT get a lap dance, and I am mad as hell!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did NOT get a lap dance , and I am mad as hell !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I did NOT get a lap dance, and I am mad as hell!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505</id>
	<title>The Fucking Crybabies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because, there was probably this <b> <i>one</i> </b> fucking cry baby who either said that they were offended about it (they may not have even been there) or worse, they said that someone <b>might</b> be offended and they should apologize - exactly who, they couldn't say but there's someone. <p>It's like that awesome SUV ad that also had an Energizer ad in it. It showed the Energizer Bunny going and going and then this big SUV runs it over. Way Cool! But this cunt of a housewife with  waaayy too much time on her hands, writes a letter to the Energizer Company and the SUV maker on how her child <i>might</i> see it and other children might see it and it would be "bad" for the kids. (Her kid has grown up to be a big wussy).</p><p>There seams to be this problem where if folks are offended walking away, turning the channel, ignoring it, or whatever is beyond them. Everyone else has to change <i>their</i> behavior to suit these people. </p><p>Being offended is nothing but a power trip. Being offended allows you to make others change. </p><p>Rant over.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because , there was probably this one fucking cry baby who either said that they were offended about it ( they may not have even been there ) or worse , they said that someone might be offended and they should apologize - exactly who , they could n't say but there 's someone .
It 's like that awesome SUV ad that also had an Energizer ad in it .
It showed the Energizer Bunny going and going and then this big SUV runs it over .
Way Cool !
But this cunt of a housewife with waaayy too much time on her hands , writes a letter to the Energizer Company and the SUV maker on how her child might see it and other children might see it and it would be " bad " for the kids .
( Her kid has grown up to be a big wussy ) .There seams to be this problem where if folks are offended walking away , turning the channel , ignoring it , or whatever is beyond them .
Everyone else has to change their behavior to suit these people .
Being offended is nothing but a power trip .
Being offended allows you to make others change .
Rant over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because, there was probably this  one  fucking cry baby who either said that they were offended about it (they may not have even been there) or worse, they said that someone might be offended and they should apologize - exactly who, they couldn't say but there's someone.
It's like that awesome SUV ad that also had an Energizer ad in it.
It showed the Energizer Bunny going and going and then this big SUV runs it over.
Way Cool!
But this cunt of a housewife with  waaayy too much time on her hands, writes a letter to the Energizer Company and the SUV maker on how her child might see it and other children might see it and it would be "bad" for the kids.
(Her kid has grown up to be a big wussy).There seams to be this problem where if folks are offended walking away, turning the channel, ignoring it, or whatever is beyond them.
Everyone else has to change their behavior to suit these people.
Being offended is nothing but a power trip.
Being offended allows you to make others change.
Rant over.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837229</id>
	<title>Re:New proposed functions for YUI</title>
	<author>Nyckname</author>
	<datestamp>1256235300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't forget the slot to feed the bills into, to keep the strip, er, script running.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget the slot to feed the bills into , to keep the strip , er , script running .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget the slot to feed the bills into, to keep the strip, er, script running.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835357</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836667</id>
	<title>Epic fail for the apology</title>
	<author>$criptah</author>
	<datestamp>1256233020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This only shows that Yahoo is like a puppy -- eager to bark but not eager to bite.  Show some balls and stop apologizing for something that is indeed pretty cool, out-of-the-box, and pretty damn creative for a tech conference.
</p><p>First of all, this did not happen in a blue county in the United States.  It happened in a country with a different set of norms.  Have you ever tried doing business in Asia without entertaining your clients? If so, I'd be curious to know how that worked out.  Every freaking meeting is a party! Secondly a lap dance is completely freaking harmless especially when the dancers are fully clothed and when they barely touch your body.
</p><p>Well, it was a great idea but Yahoo did lobotomize it with the apology.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This only shows that Yahoo is like a puppy -- eager to bark but not eager to bite .
Show some balls and stop apologizing for something that is indeed pretty cool , out-of-the-box , and pretty damn creative for a tech conference .
First of all , this did not happen in a blue county in the United States .
It happened in a country with a different set of norms .
Have you ever tried doing business in Asia without entertaining your clients ?
If so , I 'd be curious to know how that worked out .
Every freaking meeting is a party !
Secondly a lap dance is completely freaking harmless especially when the dancers are fully clothed and when they barely touch your body .
Well , it was a great idea but Yahoo did lobotomize it with the apology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This only shows that Yahoo is like a puppy -- eager to bark but not eager to bite.
Show some balls and stop apologizing for something that is indeed pretty cool, out-of-the-box, and pretty damn creative for a tech conference.
First of all, this did not happen in a blue county in the United States.
It happened in a country with a different set of norms.
Have you ever tried doing business in Asia without entertaining your clients?
If so, I'd be curious to know how that worked out.
Every freaking meeting is a party!
Secondly a lap dance is completely freaking harmless especially when the dancers are fully clothed and when they barely touch your body.
Well, it was a great idea but Yahoo did lobotomize it with the apology.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838843</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the problem?</title>
	<author>tilandal</author>
	<datestamp>1256242320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whats the difference between free beer and free lap dances?</p><p>#1) Every event I have ever been to that offered free beer also had a variety of other drinks for people who don't like beer or don't consume alcohol.</p><p>#2) I have never been to a professional event where watching people drink is an acceptable form of entertainment.</p><p>#3) If you don't drink you can simply decline. If you don't want to watch a lap dace the best you can do is leave the room. That's not, in my opinion, a reasonable thing to expect people to do during a conference.</p><p>#4) It is socially acceptable to have a few drinks in a public setting while having a lap dance is generally not.</p><p>I have no issues with adult entertainment. I don't buy the line that it is exploitation but things have a time and a place and a developers conference is not it. I am sure there was more then one person there who did not appreciate it. The fact that no one stopped to think that it may not be appropriate for the venue shows at very least a lack of taste from the event planners.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whats the difference between free beer and free lap dances ? # 1 ) Every event I have ever been to that offered free beer also had a variety of other drinks for people who do n't like beer or do n't consume alcohol. # 2 ) I have never been to a professional event where watching people drink is an acceptable form of entertainment. # 3 ) If you do n't drink you can simply decline .
If you do n't want to watch a lap dace the best you can do is leave the room .
That 's not , in my opinion , a reasonable thing to expect people to do during a conference. # 4 ) It is socially acceptable to have a few drinks in a public setting while having a lap dance is generally not.I have no issues with adult entertainment .
I do n't buy the line that it is exploitation but things have a time and a place and a developers conference is not it .
I am sure there was more then one person there who did not appreciate it .
The fact that no one stopped to think that it may not be appropriate for the venue shows at very least a lack of taste from the event planners .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whats the difference between free beer and free lap dances?#1) Every event I have ever been to that offered free beer also had a variety of other drinks for people who don't like beer or don't consume alcohol.#2) I have never been to a professional event where watching people drink is an acceptable form of entertainment.#3) If you don't drink you can simply decline.
If you don't want to watch a lap dace the best you can do is leave the room.
That's not, in my opinion, a reasonable thing to expect people to do during a conference.#4) It is socially acceptable to have a few drinks in a public setting while having a lap dance is generally not.I have no issues with adult entertainment.
I don't buy the line that it is exploitation but things have a time and a place and a developers conference is not it.
I am sure there was more then one person there who did not appreciate it.
The fact that no one stopped to think that it may not be appropriate for the venue shows at very least a lack of taste from the event planners.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29859875</id>
	<title>Re:shucks</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1256380080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Not to be outdone, the Bing team is hiring crackwhores to give blowjobs.</p></div></blockquote><p>To be fair, Microsoft are doing a good thing here.  Some of those crackwhores just got out of prison after cutting their husbands' nuts off, so they need a fresh start.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to be outdone , the Bing team is hiring crackwhores to give blowjobs.To be fair , Microsoft are doing a good thing here .
Some of those crackwhores just got out of prison after cutting their husbands ' nuts off , so they need a fresh start .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to be outdone, the Bing team is hiring crackwhores to give blowjobs.To be fair, Microsoft are doing a good thing here.
Some of those crackwhores just got out of prison after cutting their husbands' nuts off, so they need a fresh start.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837239</id>
	<title>Re:Lap dance ON STAGE?</title>
	<author>Kozz</author>
	<datestamp>1256235360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Who the hell would want a lap dance on a stage in front of tons of people.  That would be awkward and unpleasant even if you liked lap dances from strangers (rubbing their diseases all over you, heh).</p></div><p>Haven't been to many bachelor parties, eh?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who the hell would want a lap dance on a stage in front of tons of people .
That would be awkward and unpleasant even if you liked lap dances from strangers ( rubbing their diseases all over you , heh ) .Have n't been to many bachelor parties , eh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who the hell would want a lap dance on a stage in front of tons of people.
That would be awkward and unpleasant even if you liked lap dances from strangers (rubbing their diseases all over you, heh).Haven't been to many bachelor parties, eh?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836337</id>
	<title>I hope to god they contracted out....</title>
	<author>Sir.Cracked</author>
	<datestamp>1256231520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the pic on the article, It looks like they did, but my first thought on seeing this was "I hoped they contracted with professionals rather than having in-house employees do this!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the pic on the article , It looks like they did , but my first thought on seeing this was " I hoped they contracted with professionals rather than having in-house employees do this !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the pic on the article, It looks like they did, but my first thought on seeing this was "I hoped they contracted with professionals rather than having in-house employees do this!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836429</id>
	<title>How many people wish they had said</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1256232060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Screw you. Some people like lap dances so they got one, and we're not apologizing."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Screw you .
Some people like lap dances so they got one , and we 're not apologizing .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Screw you.
Some people like lap dances so they got one, and we're not apologizing.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839477</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the problem?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256202420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wouldn't see a problem with it if the dancers had all been hookers. People really need to lighten up. It is possible to both be a sex object and a person.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't see a problem with it if the dancers had all been hookers .
People really need to lighten up .
It is possible to both be a sex object and a person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't see a problem with it if the dancers had all been hookers.
People really need to lighten up.
It is possible to both be a sex object and a person.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838089</id>
	<title>geeks confuse me</title>
	<author>uniquegeek</author>
	<datestamp>1256238600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How can bright people who rise up in their field be so stupid when it comes to basic social logic?</p><p>(Granted things might be a little culturally different over there...)</p><p>Regardless where your position is on a feminist or decency angle, it's pretty obvious that it was not appropriate for the event.  On a scale of "professional" events, this one seemed somewhat more on the professional side... in which case, this type of thing has no place there.</p><p>An example -  a conference on a programming language... porn doesn't need to be on slides.  It's not professional.  It's not appropriate.  If you have second thoughts and ask friends and your spouse whether you should, that in itself is a huge clue that maybe you shouldn't.  Though many people were talking about the women &amp; feminist aspect, I really think the biggest issue of all is geeks self-stereotying themselves as socially clueless people... and being obnoxious and loud about it (look at all the responses re: the ruby conference).  Perpetuate that, and you perpetuate that we're the muling lackeys who work with the 'puters.  It certainly doesn't portray us as professionals, or candidates for positions with more responsibility.</p><p>How can someone not get this?  A lot of geeks really have mastered being so smart and so stupid at the same time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How can bright people who rise up in their field be so stupid when it comes to basic social logic ?
( Granted things might be a little culturally different over there... ) Regardless where your position is on a feminist or decency angle , it 's pretty obvious that it was not appropriate for the event .
On a scale of " professional " events , this one seemed somewhat more on the professional side... in which case , this type of thing has no place there.An example - a conference on a programming language... porn does n't need to be on slides .
It 's not professional .
It 's not appropriate .
If you have second thoughts and ask friends and your spouse whether you should , that in itself is a huge clue that maybe you should n't .
Though many people were talking about the women &amp; feminist aspect , I really think the biggest issue of all is geeks self-stereotying themselves as socially clueless people... and being obnoxious and loud about it ( look at all the responses re : the ruby conference ) .
Perpetuate that , and you perpetuate that we 're the muling lackeys who work with the 'puters .
It certainly does n't portray us as professionals , or candidates for positions with more responsibility.How can someone not get this ?
A lot of geeks really have mastered being so smart and so stupid at the same time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can bright people who rise up in their field be so stupid when it comes to basic social logic?
(Granted things might be a little culturally different over there...)Regardless where your position is on a feminist or decency angle, it's pretty obvious that it was not appropriate for the event.
On a scale of "professional" events, this one seemed somewhat more on the professional side... in which case, this type of thing has no place there.An example -  a conference on a programming language... porn doesn't need to be on slides.
It's not professional.
It's not appropriate.
If you have second thoughts and ask friends and your spouse whether you should, that in itself is a huge clue that maybe you shouldn't.
Though many people were talking about the women &amp; feminist aspect, I really think the biggest issue of all is geeks self-stereotying themselves as socially clueless people... and being obnoxious and loud about it (look at all the responses re: the ruby conference).
Perpetuate that, and you perpetuate that we're the muling lackeys who work with the 'puters.
It certainly doesn't portray us as professionals, or candidates for positions with more responsibility.How can someone not get this?
A lot of geeks really have mastered being so smart and so stupid at the same time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835779</id>
	<title>Red tape</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256229000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Clearly the only reason this is a big deal is because somebody at Yahoo circumvented the required paperwork in order to use the company testicles.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly the only reason this is a big deal is because somebody at Yahoo circumvented the required paperwork in order to use the company testicles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly the only reason this is a big deal is because somebody at Yahoo circumvented the required paperwork in order to use the company testicles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29842435</id>
	<title>Re:The Fucking Crybabies</title>
	<author>bennomatic</author>
	<datestamp>1256226540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ignore the other idiots who responded to you.  Your post is right on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ignore the other idiots who responded to you .
Your post is right on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ignore the other idiots who responded to you.
Your post is right on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836015</id>
	<title>Is that an actual picture from the event?</title>
	<author>thisnamestoolong</author>
	<datestamp>1256230020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If so -- I would be horrified, not only by the fact that I am getting a lap dance in front of a huge crowd of people, but even more so by the fact that what appears to be a naked Mr. Burns is watching over my shoulder.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If so -- I would be horrified , not only by the fact that I am getting a lap dance in front of a huge crowd of people , but even more so by the fact that what appears to be a naked Mr. Burns is watching over my shoulder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If so -- I would be horrified, not only by the fact that I am getting a lap dance in front of a huge crowd of people, but even more so by the fact that what appears to be a naked Mr. Burns is watching over my shoulder.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835775</id>
	<title>Swordfish reference?</title>
	<author>moviebrain</author>
	<datestamp>1256229000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Was this just a homage to the movie Swordfish and a few prudes objected?

Seems like blogosphere overreaction fluff...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Was this just a homage to the movie Swordfish and a few prudes objected ?
Seems like blogosphere overreaction fluff.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was this just a homage to the movie Swordfish and a few prudes objected?
Seems like blogosphere overreaction fluff...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837579</id>
	<title>Get over US centric culture</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256236680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is ASIA!! Cultures are different in different countries and u cannot apply 1 std to all countries. Im sure if the women were in Burkas we would also find that offensive.</p><p>In asia this is beyond common. NO ONE WAS NAKED and im sure the girls didnt find this degrading. I just got back from there and u have to keep an open mind. I found it interesting that women were PROUD when they made FHM, Maxim etc. They gave congrats to the girls IN CHURCH...it was considered a career booster to professional women.</p><p>Yes I found this surreal but its their culture. They all get glamor shots etc. Reminds me of 15-16yr old girls in states but hey good for them.</p><p>Stop using USA stds around the world! geezzz</p><p>BTW if u go to asia and open doors and pull out chairs and are a gentlemen it goes a REALLY LONG way there.  They will love u. It's not that common over there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is ASIA ! !
Cultures are different in different countries and u can not apply 1 std to all countries .
Im sure if the women were in Burkas we would also find that offensive.In asia this is beyond common .
NO ONE WAS NAKED and im sure the girls didnt find this degrading .
I just got back from there and u have to keep an open mind .
I found it interesting that women were PROUD when they made FHM , Maxim etc .
They gave congrats to the girls IN CHURCH...it was considered a career booster to professional women.Yes I found this surreal but its their culture .
They all get glamor shots etc .
Reminds me of 15-16yr old girls in states but hey good for them.Stop using USA stds around the world !
geezzzBTW if u go to asia and open doors and pull out chairs and are a gentlemen it goes a REALLY LONG way there .
They will love u. It 's not that common over there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is ASIA!!
Cultures are different in different countries and u cannot apply 1 std to all countries.
Im sure if the women were in Burkas we would also find that offensive.In asia this is beyond common.
NO ONE WAS NAKED and im sure the girls didnt find this degrading.
I just got back from there and u have to keep an open mind.
I found it interesting that women were PROUD when they made FHM, Maxim etc.
They gave congrats to the girls IN CHURCH...it was considered a career booster to professional women.Yes I found this surreal but its their culture.
They all get glamor shots etc.
Reminds me of 15-16yr old girls in states but hey good for them.Stop using USA stds around the world!
geezzzBTW if u go to asia and open doors and pull out chairs and are a gentlemen it goes a REALLY LONG way there.
They will love u. It's not that common over there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838909</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the problem?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256242620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Maybe I'm a bit jaded or detached, but I fail to see how offering lap dances is fundamentally different from offering free beer.</p></div><p>Beer isn't allowed to vote.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I 'm a bit jaded or detached , but I fail to see how offering lap dances is fundamentally different from offering free beer.Beer is n't allowed to vote .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I'm a bit jaded or detached, but I fail to see how offering lap dances is fundamentally different from offering free beer.Beer isn't allowed to vote.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838163</id>
	<title>Re:Sorry? What the hell for?</title>
	<author>VoidCrow</author>
	<datestamp>1256238900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sexuality is natural, sure. However, it expresses in different people in different ways, and no, I'm not talking about gay v straight sexuality. I'm surprised that so few of you, all Slashdot jokes aside, seem to understand this...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sexuality is natural , sure .
However , it expresses in different people in different ways , and no , I 'm not talking about gay v straight sexuality .
I 'm surprised that so few of you , all Slashdot jokes aside , seem to understand this.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sexuality is natural, sure.
However, it expresses in different people in different ways, and no, I'm not talking about gay v straight sexuality.
I'm surprised that so few of you, all Slashdot jokes aside, seem to understand this...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835499</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835465</id>
	<title>Huh?</title>
	<author>MightyMartian</author>
	<datestamp>1256227800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apologize for what, not inviting me?  Bastards.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apologize for what , not inviting me ?
Bastards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apologize for what, not inviting me?
Bastards.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836533</id>
	<title>I guess I missed out on the good stuff</title>
	<author>hamburgler007</author>
	<datestamp>1256232480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was at the NYC open hack a few weeks ago, nothing like that there, very nicely catered though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was at the NYC open hack a few weeks ago , nothing like that there , very nicely catered though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was at the NYC open hack a few weeks ago, nothing like that there, very nicely catered though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835315</id>
	<title>Where's the problem?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe I'm a bit jaded or detached, but I fail to see how offering lap dances is fundamentally different from offering free beer. It's cheap fun, and some people may find it morally objectionable, but in the end not a single attendee is going to end up bumping uglies with one of the dancing girls. Had the cheerleaders for an NFL team been there in tight shirts and tiny skirts waving pompoms nobody would have said a word.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I 'm a bit jaded or detached , but I fail to see how offering lap dances is fundamentally different from offering free beer .
It 's cheap fun , and some people may find it morally objectionable , but in the end not a single attendee is going to end up bumping uglies with one of the dancing girls .
Had the cheerleaders for an NFL team been there in tight shirts and tiny skirts waving pompoms nobody would have said a word .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I'm a bit jaded or detached, but I fail to see how offering lap dances is fundamentally different from offering free beer.
It's cheap fun, and some people may find it morally objectionable, but in the end not a single attendee is going to end up bumping uglies with one of the dancing girls.
Had the cheerleaders for an NFL team been there in tight shirts and tiny skirts waving pompoms nobody would have said a word.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835295</id>
	<title>Well I guess its bad...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lap dances themselves aren't inherently bad, but if they were trying to make this event all about development or if children were invited then I could see a problem.</p><p>More likely though the "outrage" expressed was about having lap dances at -any- event outside a strip club. That is something with which I vehemently disagree. If they aren't breaking local Taiwanese law then it should be perfectly acceptable. If someone doesn't like it, change the law. Don't go crying to the media to get a fake apology from Yahoo. I'm sure the recipients of the lap dances didn't mind, or the girls that got paid to be there!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lap dances themselves are n't inherently bad , but if they were trying to make this event all about development or if children were invited then I could see a problem.More likely though the " outrage " expressed was about having lap dances at -any- event outside a strip club .
That is something with which I vehemently disagree .
If they are n't breaking local Taiwanese law then it should be perfectly acceptable .
If someone does n't like it , change the law .
Do n't go crying to the media to get a fake apology from Yahoo .
I 'm sure the recipients of the lap dances did n't mind , or the girls that got paid to be there !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lap dances themselves aren't inherently bad, but if they were trying to make this event all about development or if children were invited then I could see a problem.More likely though the "outrage" expressed was about having lap dances at -any- event outside a strip club.
That is something with which I vehemently disagree.
If they aren't breaking local Taiwanese law then it should be perfectly acceptable.
If someone doesn't like it, change the law.
Don't go crying to the media to get a fake apology from Yahoo.
I'm sure the recipients of the lap dances didn't mind, or the girls that got paid to be there!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836049</id>
	<title>Not uncommon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256230200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whoever thought this was "breaking news" and "embarrassing" has obviously never been to an IT event in Taiwan, where ALL manufacturers/brands/companies have something along these lines.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whoever thought this was " breaking news " and " embarrassing " has obviously never been to an IT event in Taiwan , where ALL manufacturers/brands/companies have something along these lines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whoever thought this was "breaking news" and "embarrassing" has obviously never been to an IT event in Taiwan, where ALL manufacturers/brands/companies have something along these lines.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836627</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>cpghost</author>
	<datestamp>1256232780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Furthermore, did they think that there was some way that women attendees would be perfectly comfortable watching other women objectified on a stage?</p></div></blockquote><p>

We're not in the 60ies, 70ies or 80ies mindset anymore. Gender doesn't matter w.r.t. on how to view the show. Some male attendees may have considered this degrading for the dancers, while some female attendees may have enjoyed it. Who knows?...
</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and, frankly, who cares? All this being much ado about nothing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Furthermore , did they think that there was some way that women attendees would be perfectly comfortable watching other women objectified on a stage ?
We 're not in the 60ies , 70ies or 80ies mindset anymore .
Gender does n't matter w.r.t .
on how to view the show .
Some male attendees may have considered this degrading for the dancers , while some female attendees may have enjoyed it .
Who knows ? .. .
... and , frankly , who cares ?
All this being much ado about nothing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Furthermore, did they think that there was some way that women attendees would be perfectly comfortable watching other women objectified on a stage?
We're not in the 60ies, 70ies or 80ies mindset anymore.
Gender doesn't matter w.r.t.
on how to view the show.
Some male attendees may have considered this degrading for the dancers, while some female attendees may have enjoyed it.
Who knows?...
... and, frankly, who cares?
All this being much ado about nothing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837343</id>
	<title>The geeks look embarrassed</title>
	<author>AlejoHausner</author>
	<datestamp>1256235840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe it's just me, but the body language of the young men on stage is telling.  The guy in the yellow shirt looks like he's clenching his fists.  He looks uncomfortable.  The guy on the left is going out of his way not to raise his hands.  Plus they're on stage.  I think they're not happy to be there.
<p>
Maybe they wish they were back in front of their terminals coding.
</p><p>
Alejo</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it 's just me , but the body language of the young men on stage is telling .
The guy in the yellow shirt looks like he 's clenching his fists .
He looks uncomfortable .
The guy on the left is going out of his way not to raise his hands .
Plus they 're on stage .
I think they 're not happy to be there .
Maybe they wish they were back in front of their terminals coding .
Alejo</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it's just me, but the body language of the young men on stage is telling.
The guy in the yellow shirt looks like he's clenching his fists.
He looks uncomfortable.
The guy on the left is going out of his way not to raise his hands.
Plus they're on stage.
I think they're not happy to be there.
Maybe they wish they were back in front of their terminals coding.
Alejo</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837161</id>
	<title>Working hard for the tips</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256235120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Working hard for the tips. It is important to support the local economy at these events.  Strippers need money too. Chances are, they are college students.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Working hard for the tips .
It is important to support the local economy at these events .
Strippers need money too .
Chances are , they are college students .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Working hard for the tips.
It is important to support the local economy at these events.
Strippers need money too.
Chances are, they are college students.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835221</id>
	<title>As Gulag U.S.A. Collapses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256226840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yahoo offers lap dances.</p><p>Yyyyyyyyyyaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnn.</p><p>Yours In Novorossiysk,<br>K. Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yahoo offers lap dances.Yyyyyyyyyyaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnn.Yours In Novorossiysk,K .
Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yahoo offers lap dances.Yyyyyyyyyyaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnn.Yours In Novorossiysk,K.
Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839619</id>
	<title>Re:Sigh</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1256203140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Funny, seems the women who attended the event thought it was pretty funny to watch the awkward guys on stage not knowing what to do with the women in their face.</p><p>Did you get that part?  No?  Didn't read anything more than the summary eh?</p><p>There were female developers there<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... having a good time<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...  The thing is that the just weren't American women, which are so sexually repressed and frustrated with themselves that they can't appreciate any situation which involves a women using her assets to their advantage if it involves physical attributes.</p><p>Whats fucked up is that American women are their own worst enemy.</p><p>Do you see guys bitching about male strippers?  No, well okay, but only out of jealously.</p><p>Men are 'objectified' in the same way constantly.  We appreciate it, enjoy the praise, and are more than happy that someone else appreciates what we have.  Women in most of the rest of the world feel THE SAME WAY.</p><p>Its only in America where women get pissed off because another woman is using her abilities.  In America, you are only accepted by other women if you shoehorn yourself into doing something you aren't really that good at.</p><p>Okay, so thats false, most women in America don't give a damn about this either.  Its just the few loud mouths that get attention and the media promoting it that are a problem.  I personally don't think I've ever met a woman who truly had a problem with strippers.  I honestly don't think I've met a woman who hasn't considered BEING a stripper, including women who are now doctors, lawyers, and a VP of a rather large marketing firm in the US.</p><p>Its okay that you don't understand it, if you had some women as friends it would help you out a lot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny , seems the women who attended the event thought it was pretty funny to watch the awkward guys on stage not knowing what to do with the women in their face.Did you get that part ?
No ? Did n't read anything more than the summary eh ? There were female developers there ... having a good time ... The thing is that the just were n't American women , which are so sexually repressed and frustrated with themselves that they ca n't appreciate any situation which involves a women using her assets to their advantage if it involves physical attributes.Whats fucked up is that American women are their own worst enemy.Do you see guys bitching about male strippers ?
No , well okay , but only out of jealously.Men are 'objectified ' in the same way constantly .
We appreciate it , enjoy the praise , and are more than happy that someone else appreciates what we have .
Women in most of the rest of the world feel THE SAME WAY.Its only in America where women get pissed off because another woman is using her abilities .
In America , you are only accepted by other women if you shoehorn yourself into doing something you are n't really that good at.Okay , so thats false , most women in America do n't give a damn about this either .
Its just the few loud mouths that get attention and the media promoting it that are a problem .
I personally do n't think I 've ever met a woman who truly had a problem with strippers .
I honestly do n't think I 've met a woman who has n't considered BEING a stripper , including women who are now doctors , lawyers , and a VP of a rather large marketing firm in the US.Its okay that you do n't understand it , if you had some women as friends it would help you out a lot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny, seems the women who attended the event thought it was pretty funny to watch the awkward guys on stage not knowing what to do with the women in their face.Did you get that part?
No?  Didn't read anything more than the summary eh?There were female developers there ... having a good time ...  The thing is that the just weren't American women, which are so sexually repressed and frustrated with themselves that they can't appreciate any situation which involves a women using her assets to their advantage if it involves physical attributes.Whats fucked up is that American women are their own worst enemy.Do you see guys bitching about male strippers?
No, well okay, but only out of jealously.Men are 'objectified' in the same way constantly.
We appreciate it, enjoy the praise, and are more than happy that someone else appreciates what we have.
Women in most of the rest of the world feel THE SAME WAY.Its only in America where women get pissed off because another woman is using her abilities.
In America, you are only accepted by other women if you shoehorn yourself into doing something you aren't really that good at.Okay, so thats false, most women in America don't give a damn about this either.
Its just the few loud mouths that get attention and the media promoting it that are a problem.
I personally don't think I've ever met a woman who truly had a problem with strippers.
I honestly don't think I've met a woman who hasn't considered BEING a stripper, including women who are now doctors, lawyers, and a VP of a rather large marketing firm in the US.Its okay that you don't understand it, if you had some women as friends it would help you out a lot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29842659</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>kramulous</author>
	<datestamp>1256229540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lawyers are even worse.  Once, when I used to live with a bunch of lawyers, a girl from one of their offices (contract lawyer) was so into porn that she used to come around to our house and bring her weekly favourite movies, put them on and proceed to tell us which bits were her favourite.  She loved watching female orgasms.  She would have been a lot of fun.</p><p>My point is, let women make those decisions.  Let women take offence if they do so and let them take action if need be.  Men that take that line just look<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... desperate and hopeless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lawyers are even worse .
Once , when I used to live with a bunch of lawyers , a girl from one of their offices ( contract lawyer ) was so into porn that she used to come around to our house and bring her weekly favourite movies , put them on and proceed to tell us which bits were her favourite .
She loved watching female orgasms .
She would have been a lot of fun.My point is , let women make those decisions .
Let women take offence if they do so and let them take action if need be .
Men that take that line just look ... desperate and hopeless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lawyers are even worse.
Once, when I used to live with a bunch of lawyers, a girl from one of their offices (contract lawyer) was so into porn that she used to come around to our house and bring her weekly favourite movies, put them on and proceed to tell us which bits were her favourite.
She loved watching female orgasms.
She would have been a lot of fun.My point is, let women make those decisions.
Let women take offence if they do so and let them take action if need be.
Men that take that line just look ... desperate and hopeless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835899</id>
	<title>PC BS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256229540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>but you shouldn't need to apologize for doing something that both those that choosed to partake presumably enjoyed and that is legal. Sorry if it offends you but bite me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>but you should n't need to apologize for doing something that both those that choosed to partake presumably enjoyed and that is legal .
Sorry if it offends you but bite me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but you shouldn't need to apologize for doing something that both those that choosed to partake presumably enjoyed and that is legal.
Sorry if it offends you but bite me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836111</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>Pvt\_Ryan</author>
	<datestamp>1256230440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>ahh but what you have to remember is that the majority of devs are male. The majority of devs also like women. We live in a world where the majority once ruled the minority (I say once as lately the minoritys seem to be getting their way all the time). It saddens me that they have to appoligise for offending a few people when it is likely that the majority of people there had a good time and enjoyed it for what it was a PR stunt.</htmltext>
<tokenext>ahh but what you have to remember is that the majority of devs are male .
The majority of devs also like women .
We live in a world where the majority once ruled the minority ( I say once as lately the minoritys seem to be getting their way all the time ) .
It saddens me that they have to appoligise for offending a few people when it is likely that the majority of people there had a good time and enjoyed it for what it was a PR stunt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ahh but what you have to remember is that the majority of devs are male.
The majority of devs also like women.
We live in a world where the majority once ruled the minority (I say once as lately the minoritys seem to be getting their way all the time).
It saddens me that they have to appoligise for offending a few people when it is likely that the majority of people there had a good time and enjoyed it for what it was a PR stunt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835815</id>
	<title>Re:Lap dance ON STAGE?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256229180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>drunk enough with a bit of cocaine I would</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>drunk enough with a bit of cocaine I would</tokentext>
<sentencetext>drunk enough with a bit of cocaine I would</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835245</id>
	<title>why wasn't I get invited?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256226900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a laptop, therefore I also have a lap.  why didn't I get invited?  That's it!  No more Yahoo for me... I only Google from now on.<br>Take that big media!</p><p>(ha ha...my captcha is "quagmire"...giggity!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a laptop , therefore I also have a lap .
why did n't I get invited ?
That 's it !
No more Yahoo for me... I only Google from now on.Take that big media !
( ha ha...my captcha is " quagmire " ...giggity !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a laptop, therefore I also have a lap.
why didn't I get invited?
That's it!
No more Yahoo for me... I only Google from now on.Take that big media!
(ha ha...my captcha is "quagmire"...giggity!
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837469</id>
	<title>Re:Oblig. Bloodhound Gang reference</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256236200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like it when they take their shoes off and their feet are dirty</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like it when they take their shoes off and their feet are dirty</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like it when they take their shoes off and their feet are dirty</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837593</id>
	<title>Big deal</title>
	<author>bkr1\_2k</author>
	<datestamp>1256236740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For those who've spent any amount of time in Asia where there's any significant amount of cash, dancing girls are fairly common at bars, at restaurants, just about anywhere there are young men and women willing to spend some money.</p><p>Yahoo! shouldn't apologize for using local culture (even if it is scantily clad) to attract more attendees to its conferences.</p><p>Or maybe I'm just less of a prude than the people who are complaining about this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For those who 've spent any amount of time in Asia where there 's any significant amount of cash , dancing girls are fairly common at bars , at restaurants , just about anywhere there are young men and women willing to spend some money.Yahoo !
should n't apologize for using local culture ( even if it is scantily clad ) to attract more attendees to its conferences.Or maybe I 'm just less of a prude than the people who are complaining about this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those who've spent any amount of time in Asia where there's any significant amount of cash, dancing girls are fairly common at bars, at restaurants, just about anywhere there are young men and women willing to spend some money.Yahoo!
shouldn't apologize for using local culture (even if it is scantily clad) to attract more attendees to its conferences.Or maybe I'm just less of a prude than the people who are complaining about this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835915</id>
	<title>Big deal... I seem to remember one event</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256229600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that featured a gun to the head and a blowjob while hacking with a time limit!  Now that was a Developer's Conference!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that featured a gun to the head and a blowjob while hacking with a time limit !
Now that was a Developer 's Conference !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that featured a gun to the head and a blowjob while hacking with a time limit!
Now that was a Developer's Conference!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836213</id>
	<title>Yahoo's response</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1256230920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Due to the complaints about the entertainment at this years event, next year we will only be offering hookers and blow."</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Due to the complaints about the entertainment at this years event , next year we will only be offering hookers and blow .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Due to the complaints about the entertainment at this years event, next year we will only be offering hookers and blow.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825</id>
	<title>Re:The Fucking Crybabies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256229240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Per the article, which I know no one reads, the guy that made the remarks has a blog at <a href="http://simonwillison.net/" title="simonwillison.net">http://simonwillison.net/</a> [simonwillison.net]</p><p>He may not have been there, but his point is that for an industry that's always trying to attract women, this is the wrong thing to do.  Not to mention that even if it is culturally accepted in Taiwan, some developers may be morally opposed to this.</p><p>So we shouldn't be surprised when women don't want to enter the IT and Computer Science fields because they see it as a male dominated field.  Images like these reinforce that perception.  If you want more women in the field, do things that attract them.  Don't trot out booth babes like it's an anime/gaming convention or a car show.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Per the article , which I know no one reads , the guy that made the remarks has a blog at http : //simonwillison.net/ [ simonwillison.net ] He may not have been there , but his point is that for an industry that 's always trying to attract women , this is the wrong thing to do .
Not to mention that even if it is culturally accepted in Taiwan , some developers may be morally opposed to this.So we should n't be surprised when women do n't want to enter the IT and Computer Science fields because they see it as a male dominated field .
Images like these reinforce that perception .
If you want more women in the field , do things that attract them .
Do n't trot out booth babes like it 's an anime/gaming convention or a car show .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Per the article, which I know no one reads, the guy that made the remarks has a blog at http://simonwillison.net/ [simonwillison.net]He may not have been there, but his point is that for an industry that's always trying to attract women, this is the wrong thing to do.
Not to mention that even if it is culturally accepted in Taiwan, some developers may be morally opposed to this.So we shouldn't be surprised when women don't want to enter the IT and Computer Science fields because they see it as a male dominated field.
Images like these reinforce that perception.
If you want more women in the field, do things that attract them.
Don't trot out booth babes like it's an anime/gaming convention or a car show.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836747</id>
	<title>Re:Sorry? What the hell for?</title>
	<author>Tetsujin</author>
	<datestamp>1256233320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why can I watch someone get his head blown off on broadcast television, but adults have to say "Sorry" to other adults for offering them probably the best thing in the world, which is attractive females hovering above the crotch?</p></div><p>The best thing?</p><p>Naw, it gets better when they stop <em>hovering</em>...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why can I watch someone get his head blown off on broadcast television , but adults have to say " Sorry " to other adults for offering them probably the best thing in the world , which is attractive females hovering above the crotch ? The best thing ? Naw , it gets better when they stop hovering.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why can I watch someone get his head blown off on broadcast television, but adults have to say "Sorry" to other adults for offering them probably the best thing in the world, which is attractive females hovering above the crotch?The best thing?Naw, it gets better when they stop hovering...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835499</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838605</id>
	<title>Re:The Fucking Crybabies</title>
	<author>Vladimus</author>
	<datestamp>1256241180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hm. Depends on the girl. My girlfriend complains that I don't go to strip clubs and buy her lapdances.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hm .
Depends on the girl .
My girlfriend complains that I do n't go to strip clubs and buy her lapdances .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hm.
Depends on the girl.
My girlfriend complains that I don't go to strip clubs and buy her lapdances.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29841563</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the problem?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1256215080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in some countries, in the country this happened it's no big deal.</p><p>Why are the offended at the choice some other women make?</p><p>Why do you think I would treat a colleges the same way I would treat a stripper? I ahve many female colleges and I have never tried to put money in their pants.</p><p>I don't treat my co workers like sex object.</p><p>'Hostile workforce' is less about hostile workforce and more about control what people who have a different view on the subject.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in some countries , in the country this happened it 's no big deal.Why are the offended at the choice some other women make ? Why do you think I would treat a colleges the same way I would treat a stripper ?
I ahve many female colleges and I have never tried to put money in their pants.I do n't treat my co workers like sex object .
'Hostile workforce ' is less about hostile workforce and more about control what people who have a different view on the subject .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in some countries, in the country this happened it's no big deal.Why are the offended at the choice some other women make?Why do you think I would treat a colleges the same way I would treat a stripper?
I ahve many female colleges and I have never tried to put money in their pants.I don't treat my co workers like sex object.
'Hostile workforce' is less about hostile workforce and more about control what people who have a different view on the subject.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836917</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836743</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>Princeofcups</author>
	<datestamp>1256233320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>in the Information Technology field?  This might go some way to explain it.</p><p>Did Yahoo not think that women engineers would be present at this event?  They make up <a href="http://www.dol.gov/wb/factsheets/hitech02.htm" title="dol.gov">roughly ten percent of engineers as a whole</a> [dol.gov].  Furthermore, did they think that there was some way that women attendees would be perfectly comfortable watching other women objectified on a stage?</p><p>It's not that I mind women being objectified for money -- the women involved are handsomely rewarded for their parts in this business deal.  I do mind people in my field saying that they do everything they can to make women comfortable in our field, then turning around and saying that they don't understand why anyone would be offended by this.</p></div><p>I find this very presumptuous.  There are plenty of women who enjoy other women, and men who enjoy other men, and people who enjoy both, and people who enjoy neither.  The person's genitalia has little to do with it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>in the Information Technology field ?
This might go some way to explain it.Did Yahoo not think that women engineers would be present at this event ?
They make up roughly ten percent of engineers as a whole [ dol.gov ] .
Furthermore , did they think that there was some way that women attendees would be perfectly comfortable watching other women objectified on a stage ? It 's not that I mind women being objectified for money -- the women involved are handsomely rewarded for their parts in this business deal .
I do mind people in my field saying that they do everything they can to make women comfortable in our field , then turning around and saying that they do n't understand why anyone would be offended by this.I find this very presumptuous .
There are plenty of women who enjoy other women , and men who enjoy other men , and people who enjoy both , and people who enjoy neither .
The person 's genitalia has little to do with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in the Information Technology field?
This might go some way to explain it.Did Yahoo not think that women engineers would be present at this event?
They make up roughly ten percent of engineers as a whole [dol.gov].
Furthermore, did they think that there was some way that women attendees would be perfectly comfortable watching other women objectified on a stage?It's not that I mind women being objectified for money -- the women involved are handsomely rewarded for their parts in this business deal.
I do mind people in my field saying that they do everything they can to make women comfortable in our field, then turning around and saying that they don't understand why anyone would be offended by this.I find this very presumptuous.
There are plenty of women who enjoy other women, and men who enjoy other men, and people who enjoy both, and people who enjoy neither.
The person's genitalia has little to do with it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837083</id>
	<title>Re:Oblig. Bloodhound Gang reference</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1256234640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just about sprayed a mouthful of bagel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just about sprayed a mouthful of bagel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just about sprayed a mouthful of bagel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836509</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256232360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I neither wonder about nor care in the slightest if women are uncomfortable with the IT field.</p><p>I suspect that they are equally nonplussed by my discomfort in any field that they might find to be of interest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I neither wonder about nor care in the slightest if women are uncomfortable with the IT field.I suspect that they are equally nonplussed by my discomfort in any field that they might find to be of interest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I neither wonder about nor care in the slightest if women are uncomfortable with the IT field.I suspect that they are equally nonplussed by my discomfort in any field that they might find to be of interest.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837977</id>
	<title>Re:The Fucking Crybabies</title>
	<author>skiman1979</author>
	<datestamp>1256238120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which is why the next Blackhat and DEFCON should have diamonds as free gifts for events such as 'Spot the Fed'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is why the next Blackhat and DEFCON should have diamonds as free gifts for events such as 'Spot the Fed' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which is why the next Blackhat and DEFCON should have diamonds as free gifts for events such as 'Spot the Fed'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837819</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256237520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then, suddenly, John Travolta and Halle Berry burst in and force you at gun point to hack into bank accounts containing dirty government money and transfer all of the funds into an offshore account in Venezuela using nothing but Photoshop, AutoCAD, and an Apple Macbook balanced precariously on the back of the head of a stripper while she dances vigorously on your lap...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then , suddenly , John Travolta and Halle Berry burst in and force you at gun point to hack into bank accounts containing dirty government money and transfer all of the funds into an offshore account in Venezuela using nothing but Photoshop , AutoCAD , and an Apple Macbook balanced precariously on the back of the head of a stripper while she dances vigorously on your lap.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then, suddenly, John Travolta and Halle Berry burst in and force you at gun point to hack into bank accounts containing dirty government money and transfer all of the funds into an offshore account in Venezuela using nothing but Photoshop, AutoCAD, and an Apple Macbook balanced precariously on the back of the head of a stripper while she dances vigorously on your lap...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836471</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>that IT girl</author>
	<datestamp>1256232240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Heck, I'm a woman and I think it's kind of funny, albeit inappropriate. Not necessarily an event I'd want to be at while this was going on--simply because lap dances and this kind of sexually charged thing is generally considered part of one's personal life, and this was a business/professional event. Some women and and even more privately-minded men would feel uncomfortable. If a man wants to go to a strip club, that's his business and I personally have zero problem with that. It's just not really appropriate for this event, in the same way that overt sexual advances, talking at length about one's sex life, etc are not appropriate for the professional office.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Heck , I 'm a woman and I think it 's kind of funny , albeit inappropriate .
Not necessarily an event I 'd want to be at while this was going on--simply because lap dances and this kind of sexually charged thing is generally considered part of one 's personal life , and this was a business/professional event .
Some women and and even more privately-minded men would feel uncomfortable .
If a man wants to go to a strip club , that 's his business and I personally have zero problem with that .
It 's just not really appropriate for this event , in the same way that overt sexual advances , talking at length about one 's sex life , etc are not appropriate for the professional office .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heck, I'm a woman and I think it's kind of funny, albeit inappropriate.
Not necessarily an event I'd want to be at while this was going on--simply because lap dances and this kind of sexually charged thing is generally considered part of one's personal life, and this was a business/professional event.
Some women and and even more privately-minded men would feel uncomfortable.
If a man wants to go to a strip club, that's his business and I personally have zero problem with that.
It's just not really appropriate for this event, in the same way that overt sexual advances, talking at length about one's sex life, etc are not appropriate for the professional office.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839249</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>StormReaver</author>
	<datestamp>1256244360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; This might go some way to explain it.</p><p>If these women continue to lack a sense of humor, let's hope they <b>stay</b> out of Information Technology.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; This might go some way to explain it.If these women continue to lack a sense of humor , let 's hope they stay out of Information Technology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; This might go some way to explain it.If these women continue to lack a sense of humor, let's hope they stay out of Information Technology.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835549</id>
	<title>Re:never apologize for sex</title>
	<author>caffeinemessiah</author>
	<datestamp>1256228100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I say this because the last time I apologized to a girl for kissing her, she dumped me for being such a woosy.

Moral of the story: NEVER apologize for sex.</p></div><p>
I think it's safe to say that there's a substantial percentage of readers who are wondering: what is wrong with you? And also, kissing is not sex.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I say this because the last time I apologized to a girl for kissing her , she dumped me for being such a woosy .
Moral of the story : NEVER apologize for sex .
I think it 's safe to say that there 's a substantial percentage of readers who are wondering : what is wrong with you ?
And also , kissing is not sex .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I say this because the last time I apologized to a girl for kissing her, she dumped me for being such a woosy.
Moral of the story: NEVER apologize for sex.
I think it's safe to say that there's a substantial percentage of readers who are wondering: what is wrong with you?
And also, kissing is not sex.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835301</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836179</id>
	<title>Re:Kid in the white shirt looks akward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256230740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe they weren't interfacing well.</p><p>Maybe he was little-endian, and she was expecting big-endian...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they were n't interfacing well.Maybe he was little-endian , and she was expecting big-endian.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they weren't interfacing well.Maybe he was little-endian, and she was expecting big-endian...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837473</id>
	<title>damn</title>
	<author>mothore</author>
	<datestamp>1256236260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I want to know who blabbed!? More companies should take this much consideration into their customers. I've been wanting this same thing from the counter girl at the local gas station here. Just imagine...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to know who blabbed ! ?
More companies should take this much consideration into their customers .
I 've been wanting this same thing from the counter girl at the local gas station here .
Just imagine.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to know who blabbed!?
More companies should take this much consideration into their customers.
I've been wanting this same thing from the counter girl at the local gas station here.
Just imagine...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836581</id>
	<title>Re:Sorry? What the hell for?</title>
	<author>ChienAndalu</author>
	<datestamp>1256232600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, why bother with professionalism at all if the attendees are obviously all sex-starved single geeks who think getting a boner from watching a chicks ass in public is "sexual empowerment"?</p><p>You don't have to be a Christian puritan to have some notion of taste. You can be a secular atheist citizen of an "unrepressed EU State" and still have some concept of appropriateness.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , why bother with professionalism at all if the attendees are obviously all sex-starved single geeks who think getting a boner from watching a chicks ass in public is " sexual empowerment " ? You do n't have to be a Christian puritan to have some notion of taste .
You can be a secular atheist citizen of an " unrepressed EU State " and still have some concept of appropriateness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, why bother with professionalism at all if the attendees are obviously all sex-starved single geeks who think getting a boner from watching a chicks ass in public is "sexual empowerment"?You don't have to be a Christian puritan to have some notion of taste.
You can be a secular atheist citizen of an "unrepressed EU State" and still have some concept of appropriateness.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835499</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835685</id>
	<title>So sorry .. not love you long time :-((</title>
	<author>OzPeter</author>
	<datestamp>1256228580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So says Yahoo execs falling over each other to appologize</htmltext>
<tokenext>So says Yahoo execs falling over each other to appologize</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So says Yahoo execs falling over each other to appologize</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836945</id>
	<title>Re:The Fucking Crybabies</title>
	<author>pete-wilko</author>
	<datestamp>1256234100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Disappointed had to read this far down to find this comment.  The dis-proportionality in gender ratios in IT for western countries is pretty demoralizing.  Having said that there are greater balances in developing nations.  To perpetuate a culture which discourages 50\% of the population from looking into IT as a career path means we are missing out on some pretty good talent.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Disappointed had to read this far down to find this comment .
The dis-proportionality in gender ratios in IT for western countries is pretty demoralizing .
Having said that there are greater balances in developing nations .
To perpetuate a culture which discourages 50 \ % of the population from looking into IT as a career path means we are missing out on some pretty good talent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disappointed had to read this far down to find this comment.
The dis-proportionality in gender ratios in IT for western countries is pretty demoralizing.
Having said that there are greater balances in developing nations.
To perpetuate a culture which discourages 50\% of the population from looking into IT as a career path means we are missing out on some pretty good talent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836189</id>
	<title>Cool?</title>
	<author>rnturn</author>
	<datestamp>1256230860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When were lap dances at a technical conference ever considered "cool"?  And what's with the pudgy Bender character? The whole event seems a lot more creepy then cool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When were lap dances at a technical conference ever considered " cool " ?
And what 's with the pudgy Bender character ?
The whole event seems a lot more creepy then cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When were lap dances at a technical conference ever considered "cool"?
And what's with the pudgy Bender character?
The whole event seems a lot more creepy then cool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835227</id>
	<title>Wow.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256226840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm obviously writing software for the wrong company.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm obviously writing software for the wrong company .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm obviously writing software for the wrong company.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835771</id>
	<title>why apologize</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256229000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean seriously why does Yahoo apologize for this ?<br>Lapdances is certainly a good way to entertain developpers.<br>A good lapdance every day would certainly enhance my productivity (amongst other things).</p><p>Is sex so sinful that you have to apologize for a meer lapdance ?</p><p>I remeber Yahoo authorising some kind of auction for nazi objects, shouldn't they be more ashamed of that kind of business ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean seriously why does Yahoo apologize for this ? Lapdances is certainly a good way to entertain developpers.A good lapdance every day would certainly enhance my productivity ( amongst other things ) .Is sex so sinful that you have to apologize for a meer lapdance ? I remeber Yahoo authorising some kind of auction for nazi objects , should n't they be more ashamed of that kind of business ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean seriously why does Yahoo apologize for this ?Lapdances is certainly a good way to entertain developpers.A good lapdance every day would certainly enhance my productivity (amongst other things).Is sex so sinful that you have to apologize for a meer lapdance ?I remeber Yahoo authorising some kind of auction for nazi objects, shouldn't they be more ashamed of that kind of business ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838633</id>
	<title>Re:As Gulag U.S.A. Collapses</title>
	<author>Philip K Dickhead</author>
	<datestamp>1256241300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>KILGORE! I LOVE YOU!</p><p>When's the sequel to <i>Venus on the Half Shell</i> going to appear?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>KILGORE !
I LOVE YOU ! When 's the sequel to Venus on the Half Shell going to appear ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KILGORE!
I LOVE YOU!When's the sequel to Venus on the Half Shell going to appear?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835221</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837269</id>
	<title>Embarrasment?</title>
	<author>LS</author>
	<datestamp>1256235480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yahoo's latest embarrassment seems like a sign that the company is just trying too hard to be cool.</p></div><p>Wait, weren't we just trashing Microsoft for their goofy attempt at trying to be cool with their "party packs" and videos?  This actually IS cool, yet they are trying too hard too.  I guess you just can't win...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yahoo 's latest embarrassment seems like a sign that the company is just trying too hard to be cool.Wait , were n't we just trashing Microsoft for their goofy attempt at trying to be cool with their " party packs " and videos ?
This actually IS cool , yet they are trying too hard too .
I guess you just ca n't win.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yahoo's latest embarrassment seems like a sign that the company is just trying too hard to be cool.Wait, weren't we just trashing Microsoft for their goofy attempt at trying to be cool with their "party packs" and videos?
This actually IS cool, yet they are trying too hard too.
I guess you just can't win...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839359</id>
	<title>Re:The Fucking Crybabies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256244900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want more hot lesbians in the field. This should do a perfectly fine job of attracting them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want more hot lesbians in the field .
This should do a perfectly fine job of attracting them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want more hot lesbians in the field.
This should do a perfectly fine job of attracting them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837493</id>
	<title>Apologize!</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1256236380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For neglecting to invite me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For neglecting to invite me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For neglecting to invite me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835301</id>
	<title>never apologize for sex</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think Yahoo should be like, "F**k yeah!  We have lap dances at our events."
I say this because the last time I apologized to a girl for kissing her, she dumped me for being such a woosy.
<p>
Moral of the story: <b>NEVER apologize for sex</b>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Yahoo should be like , " F * * k yeah !
We have lap dances at our events .
" I say this because the last time I apologized to a girl for kissing her , she dumped me for being such a woosy .
Moral of the story : NEVER apologize for sex .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Yahoo should be like, "F**k yeah!
We have lap dances at our events.
"
I say this because the last time I apologized to a girl for kissing her, she dumped me for being such a woosy.
Moral of the story: NEVER apologize for sex.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835863</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>mdm-adph</author>
	<datestamp>1256229480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Did Yahoo not think that women engineers would be present at this event?  They make up <a href="http://www.dol.gov/wb/factsheets/hitech02.htm" title="dol.gov">roughly ten percent of engineers as a whole</a> [dol.gov].  Furthermore, did they think that there was some way that women attendees would be perfectly comfortable watching other women objectified on a stage?</p></div><p>Hell, there's women present in some of the pictures from the event -- I would love to hear their thoughts on this and what it was like being there.</p><p><a href="http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/12454\_large\_Yahoo\_Hack\_Event.jpg" title="dailytech.com">http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/12454\_large\_Yahoo\_Hack\_Event.jpg</a> [dailytech.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did Yahoo not think that women engineers would be present at this event ?
They make up roughly ten percent of engineers as a whole [ dol.gov ] .
Furthermore , did they think that there was some way that women attendees would be perfectly comfortable watching other women objectified on a stage ? Hell , there 's women present in some of the pictures from the event -- I would love to hear their thoughts on this and what it was like being there.http : //images.dailytech.com/nimage/12454 \ _large \ _Yahoo \ _Hack \ _Event.jpg [ dailytech.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did Yahoo not think that women engineers would be present at this event?
They make up roughly ten percent of engineers as a whole [dol.gov].
Furthermore, did they think that there was some way that women attendees would be perfectly comfortable watching other women objectified on a stage?Hell, there's women present in some of the pictures from the event -- I would love to hear their thoughts on this and what it was like being there.http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/12454\_large\_Yahoo\_Hack\_Event.jpg [dailytech.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835383</id>
	<title>It was the dancer they found objectionable</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What disturbed them being offered a lap dance by a 300lb male hacker with serious acne.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What disturbed them being offered a lap dance by a 300lb male hacker with serious acne .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What disturbed them being offered a lap dance by a 300lb male hacker with serious acne.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839423</id>
	<title>Re:The Fucking Crybabies</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1256202060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>some developers may be morally opposed to this.</p></div></blockquote><p>Cry me a river.  Everyone morally objects to something someone else does, get over it.  No one was harmed.  No one did anything against their will.  There were no guns to heads.</p><p>Anyone who has a problem with this event is the exact kind of uncultured intolerant person that I personally have no need to work with, male OR female.</p><p>I'm not changing my ways to appease someone else because they 'dont like' some aspect of the culture of the field.  If they want to be in IT they can adjust to the IT field.  As they join the IT field will change based on the ratios of what people prefer.</p><p>Real women (just like real men) have no problem entering a hostile field without whining and bitching.  What you are doing is attempting to change a field, to encourage more people to join it, but the people you are encouraging don't WANT to join it.  You want to change the field to get what YOU want, not what women want.</p><p>Not EVERYTHING has to have a perfect balance based on sex or race.  Differences between sex and race AND CULTURE will ALWAYS result in less than a perfect balance.  Thats not a bad thing, thats reality and you need to check it out.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>some developers may be morally opposed to this.Cry me a river .
Everyone morally objects to something someone else does , get over it .
No one was harmed .
No one did anything against their will .
There were no guns to heads.Anyone who has a problem with this event is the exact kind of uncultured intolerant person that I personally have no need to work with , male OR female.I 'm not changing my ways to appease someone else because they 'dont like ' some aspect of the culture of the field .
If they want to be in IT they can adjust to the IT field .
As they join the IT field will change based on the ratios of what people prefer.Real women ( just like real men ) have no problem entering a hostile field without whining and bitching .
What you are doing is attempting to change a field , to encourage more people to join it , but the people you are encouraging do n't WANT to join it .
You want to change the field to get what YOU want , not what women want.Not EVERYTHING has to have a perfect balance based on sex or race .
Differences between sex and race AND CULTURE will ALWAYS result in less than a perfect balance .
Thats not a bad thing , thats reality and you need to check it out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>some developers may be morally opposed to this.Cry me a river.
Everyone morally objects to something someone else does, get over it.
No one was harmed.
No one did anything against their will.
There were no guns to heads.Anyone who has a problem with this event is the exact kind of uncultured intolerant person that I personally have no need to work with, male OR female.I'm not changing my ways to appease someone else because they 'dont like' some aspect of the culture of the field.
If they want to be in IT they can adjust to the IT field.
As they join the IT field will change based on the ratios of what people prefer.Real women (just like real men) have no problem entering a hostile field without whining and bitching.
What you are doing is attempting to change a field, to encourage more people to join it, but the people you are encouraging don't WANT to join it.
You want to change the field to get what YOU want, not what women want.Not EVERYTHING has to have a perfect balance based on sex or race.
Differences between sex and race AND CULTURE will ALWAYS result in less than a perfect balance.
Thats not a bad thing, thats reality and you need to check it out.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835461</id>
	<title>Too funny.. but YES it was inappropriate.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thats too funny this will definitely be an epic thread.  Those girls are hot! but it shouldn't have happened.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats too funny this will definitely be an epic thread .
Those girls are hot !
but it should n't have happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats too funny this will definitely be an epic thread.
Those girls are hot!
but it shouldn't have happened.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835337</id>
	<title>Oblig. Bloodhound Gang reference</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Personally, I always prefer a lap dance when the stripper is crying.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally , I always prefer a lap dance when the stripper is crying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally, I always prefer a lap dance when the stripper is crying.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838289</id>
	<title>Re:Lap dance ON STAGE?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256239440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>straight guys?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>straight guys ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>straight guys?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835499</id>
	<title>Sorry? What the hell for?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry for what? Sexuality is natural, this is a secular country. The creative people who made the internet what it is are mostly secular, agnostic, or atheist.</p><p>Why can I watch someone get his head blown off on broadcast television, but adults have to say "Sorry" to other adults for offering them probably the best thing in the world, which is attractive females hovering above the crotch?</p><p>If anything, forbid taking of pictures, but if everyone in attendance is over 18, who gives a shit?<br>Let the fucking fundamentalists build their own internet. This one was built by punks, goths, rakes, rogues, and geeks, who all LOVE PORN!</p><p>This Puritan country needs an enema, expatriation to the sexually normal and unrepressed EU is looking better and better.<br>This is all especially hypocritical because so many male I.T. sales reps take their male clients to strip clubs anyway.</p><p>DOOFUSES! FIGHT THE FUCKING MORALITY DRONES! SPEAK UP! THEY ARE NOT THE MAJORITY IN THIS COUNTRY AND THEY NEVER WERE!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry for what ?
Sexuality is natural , this is a secular country .
The creative people who made the internet what it is are mostly secular , agnostic , or atheist.Why can I watch someone get his head blown off on broadcast television , but adults have to say " Sorry " to other adults for offering them probably the best thing in the world , which is attractive females hovering above the crotch ? If anything , forbid taking of pictures , but if everyone in attendance is over 18 , who gives a shit ? Let the fucking fundamentalists build their own internet .
This one was built by punks , goths , rakes , rogues , and geeks , who all LOVE PORN ! This Puritan country needs an enema , expatriation to the sexually normal and unrepressed EU is looking better and better.This is all especially hypocritical because so many male I.T .
sales reps take their male clients to strip clubs anyway.DOOFUSES !
FIGHT THE FUCKING MORALITY DRONES !
SPEAK UP !
THEY ARE NOT THE MAJORITY IN THIS COUNTRY AND THEY NEVER WERE !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry for what?
Sexuality is natural, this is a secular country.
The creative people who made the internet what it is are mostly secular, agnostic, or atheist.Why can I watch someone get his head blown off on broadcast television, but adults have to say "Sorry" to other adults for offering them probably the best thing in the world, which is attractive females hovering above the crotch?If anything, forbid taking of pictures, but if everyone in attendance is over 18, who gives a shit?Let the fucking fundamentalists build their own internet.
This one was built by punks, goths, rakes, rogues, and geeks, who all LOVE PORN!This Puritan country needs an enema, expatriation to the sexually normal and unrepressed EU is looking better and better.This is all especially hypocritical because so many male I.T.
sales reps take their male clients to strip clubs anyway.DOOFUSES!
FIGHT THE FUCKING MORALITY DRONES!
SPEAK UP!
THEY ARE NOT THE MAJORITY IN THIS COUNTRY AND THEY NEVER WERE!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835311</id>
	<title>that will make you yodel</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1256227200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ya-HOOO-WOOO-OOO</p><p><a href="http://yodelstudio.yahoo.com/us/" title="yahoo.com" rel="nofollow">http://yodelstudio.yahoo.com/us/</a> [yahoo.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ya-HOOO-WOOO-OOOhttp : //yodelstudio.yahoo.com/us/ [ yahoo.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ya-HOOO-WOOO-OOOhttp://yodelstudio.yahoo.com/us/ [yahoo.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837009</id>
	<title>Re:Lap dance ON STAGE?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1256234220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uuum, must be a really sad sad life you live, with views like "Being in the center of a group, leading them, is oh so horrible!", "I don't like lap dances, even from really hot strangers." and "Ewww, humans! They could give me diseases!".</p><p>Maybe you just never really get any of that...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...then again, it may be, *because* you act like that.<br>(And the circle closes. ^^)</p><p>*Live* your life! You only got one!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uuum , must be a really sad sad life you live , with views like " Being in the center of a group , leading them , is oh so horrible !
" , " I do n't like lap dances , even from really hot strangers .
" and " Ewww , humans !
They could give me diseases !
" .Maybe you just never really get any of that... ...then again , it may be , * because * you act like that .
( And the circle closes .
^ ^ ) * Live * your life !
You only got one !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uuum, must be a really sad sad life you live, with views like "Being in the center of a group, leading them, is oh so horrible!
", "I don't like lap dances, even from really hot strangers.
" and "Ewww, humans!
They could give me diseases!
".Maybe you just never really get any of that... ...then again, it may be, *because* you act like that.
(And the circle closes.
^^)*Live* your life!
You only got one!
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836973</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256234160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And all of those women who weren't perfectly comfortable were inconveniently handcuffed to their chairs, and thus unable to leave.</p><p>NEWS FLASH: The world does not revolve around you or any other person.<br>If you don't like somebody, avoid them.<br>If you don't like what goes on in a particular place, leave.<br>The people involved were not breaking any laws.<br>The people "offended" do not own (nor have the authority to make the rules for) that space.<br>The people "offended" were not required to be in that space, and had the opportunity to leave at any time.</p><p>The "offended" have nobody to blame but themselves for their stupidity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And all of those women who were n't perfectly comfortable were inconveniently handcuffed to their chairs , and thus unable to leave.NEWS FLASH : The world does not revolve around you or any other person.If you do n't like somebody , avoid them.If you do n't like what goes on in a particular place , leave.The people involved were not breaking any laws.The people " offended " do not own ( nor have the authority to make the rules for ) that space.The people " offended " were not required to be in that space , and had the opportunity to leave at any time.The " offended " have nobody to blame but themselves for their stupidity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And all of those women who weren't perfectly comfortable were inconveniently handcuffed to their chairs, and thus unable to leave.NEWS FLASH: The world does not revolve around you or any other person.If you don't like somebody, avoid them.If you don't like what goes on in a particular place, leave.The people involved were not breaking any laws.The people "offended" do not own (nor have the authority to make the rules for) that space.The people "offended" were not required to be in that space, and had the opportunity to leave at any time.The "offended" have nobody to blame but themselves for their stupidity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835643</id>
	<title>Pictures...</title>
	<author>jeffshoaf</author>
	<datestamp>1256228460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pictures or it didn't happ... Oh, wait...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pictures or it did n't happ... Oh , wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pictures or it didn't happ... Oh, wait...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836917</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the problem?</title>
	<author>amplt1337</author>
	<datestamp>1256233980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Had the cheerleaders for an NFL team been there in tight shirts and tiny skirts waving pompoms nobody would have said a word.</p></div><p>Um, no.</p><p>Women (try talking to one sometime) are very widely offended at the whole phenomenon of Booth Babes, scantily clad spokesmodels, etc.  The difference with this is that because it was lapdances, it actually makes the news.<br>It's just as hostile to the women who want to be treated as colleagues (instead of sex objects) to have micro-bikini models hanging around, but that won't make the papers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Had the cheerleaders for an NFL team been there in tight shirts and tiny skirts waving pompoms nobody would have said a word.Um , no.Women ( try talking to one sometime ) are very widely offended at the whole phenomenon of Booth Babes , scantily clad spokesmodels , etc .
The difference with this is that because it was lapdances , it actually makes the news.It 's just as hostile to the women who want to be treated as colleagues ( instead of sex objects ) to have micro-bikini models hanging around , but that wo n't make the papers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Had the cheerleaders for an NFL team been there in tight shirts and tiny skirts waving pompoms nobody would have said a word.Um, no.Women (try talking to one sometime) are very widely offended at the whole phenomenon of Booth Babes, scantily clad spokesmodels, etc.
The difference with this is that because it was lapdances, it actually makes the news.It's just as hostile to the women who want to be treated as colleagues (instead of sex objects) to have micro-bikini models hanging around, but that won't make the papers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838609</id>
	<title>Yes, I'm female.  And this doesn't bother me</title>
	<author>Rastl</author>
	<datestamp>1256241180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Big whoop.  Strippers and lap dances in a venue expected to be attended by males in a location where it's the norm to have such entertainment.</p><p>Had I been there I would have either found something else to do or be highly entertained by the idjits stuffing money into g-strings.  Silly waste of money (imo) but if they can spare it and are enjoying the show then more power to them.</p><p>As I see it the "true feminist" is a person who believes that a woman has the right to choose how to live their lives.  Some choose to enter the workforce, some choose to stay home and raise their families.  But the important thing is that they have the choice.  Incidentally those women who do enter the workforce should be paid the same as their male counterparts but honestly should that even need to be said any more?  Either of the above listed choices should be highly endorsed by true feminists because the choice is available.</p><p>Did Yahoo do anything wrong?  Nope.  Not a thing.  I haven't really searched but I'm not seeing a lot of negative comments from the attendees or the hired help.  If they're not complaining why should anyone else?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Big whoop .
Strippers and lap dances in a venue expected to be attended by males in a location where it 's the norm to have such entertainment.Had I been there I would have either found something else to do or be highly entertained by the idjits stuffing money into g-strings .
Silly waste of money ( imo ) but if they can spare it and are enjoying the show then more power to them.As I see it the " true feminist " is a person who believes that a woman has the right to choose how to live their lives .
Some choose to enter the workforce , some choose to stay home and raise their families .
But the important thing is that they have the choice .
Incidentally those women who do enter the workforce should be paid the same as their male counterparts but honestly should that even need to be said any more ?
Either of the above listed choices should be highly endorsed by true feminists because the choice is available.Did Yahoo do anything wrong ?
Nope. Not a thing .
I have n't really searched but I 'm not seeing a lot of negative comments from the attendees or the hired help .
If they 're not complaining why should anyone else ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Big whoop.
Strippers and lap dances in a venue expected to be attended by males in a location where it's the norm to have such entertainment.Had I been there I would have either found something else to do or be highly entertained by the idjits stuffing money into g-strings.
Silly waste of money (imo) but if they can spare it and are enjoying the show then more power to them.As I see it the "true feminist" is a person who believes that a woman has the right to choose how to live their lives.
Some choose to enter the workforce, some choose to stay home and raise their families.
But the important thing is that they have the choice.
Incidentally those women who do enter the workforce should be paid the same as their male counterparts but honestly should that even need to be said any more?
Either of the above listed choices should be highly endorsed by true feminists because the choice is available.Did Yahoo do anything wrong?
Nope.  Not a thing.
I haven't really searched but I'm not seeing a lot of negative comments from the attendees or the hired help.
If they're not complaining why should anyone else?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835667</id>
	<title>embarrestment ?</title>
	<author>prozaker</author>
	<datestamp>1256228520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>you have all wrong, this is a WIN <br>

I'm gonnna do all my next 10 searches on yahoo just for that</htmltext>
<tokenext>you have all wrong , this is a WIN I 'm gonnna do all my next 10 searches on yahoo just for that</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you have all wrong, this is a WIN 

I'm gonnna do all my next 10 searches on yahoo just for that</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836477</id>
	<title>Cunning!</title>
	<author>slashmojo</author>
	<datestamp>1256232240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This must be how Yahoo plans to combat the yahoo--&gt;google brain drain - a cunning plan indeed!</p><p>Clearly you can take the conference out of vegas but you can't take vegas out of the conference..<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This must be how Yahoo plans to combat the yahoo-- &gt; google brain drain - a cunning plan indeed ! Clearly you can take the conference out of vegas but you ca n't take vegas out of the conference.. ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This must be how Yahoo plans to combat the yahoo--&gt;google brain drain - a cunning plan indeed!Clearly you can take the conference out of vegas but you can't take vegas out of the conference.. ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837441</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>demachina</author>
	<datestamp>1256236140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Wonder why women are so uncomfortable in the Information Technology field?"</p><p>My theory is that women shun the tech world because they tend to have more common sense than men.  Other than maybe during the tech bubble it is generally a pretty shitty career path.  There are a few rock star geeks who get rich but its mostly the sales, marketing and MBA types that make it to the top of most companies and make most of the money.  Most techies get a wonderful life of deadlines, death marches to meet schedules and bug databases.  Lately they get the wonderful opportunity to compete for jobs against people in China, India and Eastern Europe making a couple dollars an hour.</p><p>I tend to think women should be gleeful they were driven out of tech for the most part so they could focus on careers that don't suck like business, marketing, sales, law, medicine, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Wonder why women are so uncomfortable in the Information Technology field ?
" My theory is that women shun the tech world because they tend to have more common sense than men .
Other than maybe during the tech bubble it is generally a pretty shitty career path .
There are a few rock star geeks who get rich but its mostly the sales , marketing and MBA types that make it to the top of most companies and make most of the money .
Most techies get a wonderful life of deadlines , death marches to meet schedules and bug databases .
Lately they get the wonderful opportunity to compete for jobs against people in China , India and Eastern Europe making a couple dollars an hour.I tend to think women should be gleeful they were driven out of tech for the most part so they could focus on careers that do n't suck like business , marketing , sales , law , medicine , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Wonder why women are so uncomfortable in the Information Technology field?
"My theory is that women shun the tech world because they tend to have more common sense than men.
Other than maybe during the tech bubble it is generally a pretty shitty career path.
There are a few rock star geeks who get rich but its mostly the sales, marketing and MBA types that make it to the top of most companies and make most of the money.
Most techies get a wonderful life of deadlines, death marches to meet schedules and bug databases.
Lately they get the wonderful opportunity to compete for jobs against people in China, India and Eastern Europe making a couple dollars an hour.I tend to think women should be gleeful they were driven out of tech for the most part so they could focus on careers that don't suck like business, marketing, sales, law, medicine, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836079</id>
	<title>Re:Kid in the white shirt looks akward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256230320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ha ha ha<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. no wonder I can't get a job. I'm missing some real-world "experience".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ha ha ha .. no wonder I ca n't get a job .
I 'm missing some real-world " experience " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ha ha ha .. no wonder I can't get a job.
I'm missing some real-world "experience".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835255</id>
	<title>as they would say on FARK..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256226960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get the popcorn... this is going to be an epic thread.  We've already had the "Wish I was there" post, it's time for the feminist wing to turn up.  Oh the objectification!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get the popcorn... this is going to be an epic thread .
We 've already had the " Wish I was there " post , it 's time for the feminist wing to turn up .
Oh the objectification !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get the popcorn... this is going to be an epic thread.
We've already had the "Wish I was there" post, it's time for the feminist wing to turn up.
Oh the objectification!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836679</id>
	<title>Re:shucks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256233020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to be outdone, the Bing team is hiring crackwhores to give blowjobs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to be outdone , the Bing team is hiring crackwhores to give blowjobs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to be outdone, the Bing team is hiring crackwhores to give blowjobs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29842609</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the problem?</title>
	<author>kramulous</author>
	<datestamp>1256229000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My wife took me to a strip club for my birthday, got me drunk, bought me a lapdance and then took advantage of me.</p><p>Most women that I know realise that there are women that don't do much for their liberation.  They are ok with it and accept it and enjoy it for what it is.  Just as there are men who pretend to be bigger feminists than women and in doing so look stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My wife took me to a strip club for my birthday , got me drunk , bought me a lapdance and then took advantage of me.Most women that I know realise that there are women that do n't do much for their liberation .
They are ok with it and accept it and enjoy it for what it is .
Just as there are men who pretend to be bigger feminists than women and in doing so look stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My wife took me to a strip club for my birthday, got me drunk, bought me a lapdance and then took advantage of me.Most women that I know realise that there are women that don't do much for their liberation.
They are ok with it and accept it and enjoy it for what it is.
Just as there are men who pretend to be bigger feminists than women and in doing so look stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836917</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839479</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1256202420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you are using us Department of Labor stats to talk about something that happened in Taiwan ?  Talk about ignoring scoping issues.</p><p>This post isn't insightful, its misleading.  You're applying American culture and statistics to a country on the other side of the planet.  This sort of ignorance is why we, as Americans get referred to as completely uncultured twits.  Please stop talking about how things are 'wrong' parts of the world you probably can't even find on a map without names printed on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you are using us Department of Labor stats to talk about something that happened in Taiwan ?
Talk about ignoring scoping issues.This post is n't insightful , its misleading .
You 're applying American culture and statistics to a country on the other side of the planet .
This sort of ignorance is why we , as Americans get referred to as completely uncultured twits .
Please stop talking about how things are 'wrong ' parts of the world you probably ca n't even find on a map without names printed on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you are using us Department of Labor stats to talk about something that happened in Taiwan ?
Talk about ignoring scoping issues.This post isn't insightful, its misleading.
You're applying American culture and statistics to a country on the other side of the planet.
This sort of ignorance is why we, as Americans get referred to as completely uncultured twits.
Please stop talking about how things are 'wrong' parts of the world you probably can't even find on a map without names printed on it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836131</id>
	<title>Stating the obvious...</title>
	<author>jjoelc</author>
	<datestamp>1256230500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't believe nobody else has said it yet...

It was the only way they could actually get a room full of geeks to all shout "Yah-hooooooo-ooo!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't believe nobody else has said it yet.. . It was the only way they could actually get a room full of geeks to all shout " Yah-hooooooo-ooo !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't believe nobody else has said it yet...

It was the only way they could actually get a room full of geeks to all shout "Yah-hooooooo-ooo!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836417</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>Jearil</author>
	<datestamp>1256232000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually there was someone there who interviewed a bunch of the women hackers at the event. A lot of them thought it was funny watching the awkward guys up on stage going through having a girl dance next to them. Even more said they didn't even notice what was going on on stage. Apparently the dances only happened twice during the multi-day event and each dance was for about 5 minutes.</p><p>There's been a lot of outcry from women in the US about it, but none of the women who attended the event had anything negative to say.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually there was someone there who interviewed a bunch of the women hackers at the event .
A lot of them thought it was funny watching the awkward guys up on stage going through having a girl dance next to them .
Even more said they did n't even notice what was going on on stage .
Apparently the dances only happened twice during the multi-day event and each dance was for about 5 minutes.There 's been a lot of outcry from women in the US about it , but none of the women who attended the event had anything negative to say .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually there was someone there who interviewed a bunch of the women hackers at the event.
A lot of them thought it was funny watching the awkward guys up on stage going through having a girl dance next to them.
Even more said they didn't even notice what was going on on stage.
Apparently the dances only happened twice during the multi-day event and each dance was for about 5 minutes.There's been a lot of outcry from women in the US about it, but none of the women who attended the event had anything negative to say.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836849</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>FrameRotBlues</author>
	<datestamp>1256233680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have you ever been to a strip club?  If not, prepare for your mind to be blown:<br> <br>10-25\% of the patrons in any strip club are female.  Usually they come in with their significant others, but not always - sometimes they're loners, sometimes they're in a caravan of females (batchelorette parties).  I would be willing to guess that per capita, the percentage of women at the event that found it offensive would be the same percentage as the number of men.  <br> <br>That doesn't say whether this event was right or wrong, I'm just saying that I don't believe gender plays that much of a role in it, or that every woman would have been offended by it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you ever been to a strip club ?
If not , prepare for your mind to be blown : 10-25 \ % of the patrons in any strip club are female .
Usually they come in with their significant others , but not always - sometimes they 're loners , sometimes they 're in a caravan of females ( batchelorette parties ) .
I would be willing to guess that per capita , the percentage of women at the event that found it offensive would be the same percentage as the number of men .
That does n't say whether this event was right or wrong , I 'm just saying that I do n't believe gender plays that much of a role in it , or that every woman would have been offended by it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you ever been to a strip club?
If not, prepare for your mind to be blown: 10-25\% of the patrons in any strip club are female.
Usually they come in with their significant others, but not always - sometimes they're loners, sometimes they're in a caravan of females (batchelorette parties).
I would be willing to guess that per capita, the percentage of women at the event that found it offensive would be the same percentage as the number of men.
That doesn't say whether this event was right or wrong, I'm just saying that I don't believe gender plays that much of a role in it, or that every woman would have been offended by it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837159</id>
	<title>Slightly conflicted on this one, but...</title>
	<author>Veretax</author>
	<datestamp>1256235120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As a techie, and a bible believing Christian, I have conflicting feelings about this.   On one hand my initial reaction was to think it was so outrageous, but then as i thought some more about it, how is this any different than the advertisements we get bombarded with on TV?  I mean the first commercial I thought of is the Lady driving her cadilac, are they trying to entice you with the car? No they are trying to entice you by sublimally making you think hey, if I have a Cadilac I could have a hot gal of my Own driving with me.<br> <br>

I believe this is not an uncommon thing, I mean I'd wager that about three quarters of the ads I've seen on TV lately have some sort of sexual message to try and sell or attract their customers.  How about those Go'Daddy Commercials, or the other ones that Danica Patrick is in, do you think they aren't trying to use 'sex' or 'sexual imagery' to sell a product?  Of course they are, and many of us as human beings are drawn to that even if we have conservative values.  So while I understand the 'outrage' some may have over this event, I'm kind of in the mind of saying, "So what?  How is this different from the rest of the world and how they advertise their products and services?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a techie , and a bible believing Christian , I have conflicting feelings about this .
On one hand my initial reaction was to think it was so outrageous , but then as i thought some more about it , how is this any different than the advertisements we get bombarded with on TV ?
I mean the first commercial I thought of is the Lady driving her cadilac , are they trying to entice you with the car ?
No they are trying to entice you by sublimally making you think hey , if I have a Cadilac I could have a hot gal of my Own driving with me .
I believe this is not an uncommon thing , I mean I 'd wager that about three quarters of the ads I 've seen on TV lately have some sort of sexual message to try and sell or attract their customers .
How about those Go'Daddy Commercials , or the other ones that Danica Patrick is in , do you think they are n't trying to use 'sex ' or 'sexual imagery ' to sell a product ?
Of course they are , and many of us as human beings are drawn to that even if we have conservative values .
So while I understand the 'outrage ' some may have over this event , I 'm kind of in the mind of saying , " So what ?
How is this different from the rest of the world and how they advertise their products and services ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a techie, and a bible believing Christian, I have conflicting feelings about this.
On one hand my initial reaction was to think it was so outrageous, but then as i thought some more about it, how is this any different than the advertisements we get bombarded with on TV?
I mean the first commercial I thought of is the Lady driving her cadilac, are they trying to entice you with the car?
No they are trying to entice you by sublimally making you think hey, if I have a Cadilac I could have a hot gal of my Own driving with me.
I believe this is not an uncommon thing, I mean I'd wager that about three quarters of the ads I've seen on TV lately have some sort of sexual message to try and sell or attract their customers.
How about those Go'Daddy Commercials, or the other ones that Danica Patrick is in, do you think they aren't trying to use 'sex' or 'sexual imagery' to sell a product?
Of course they are, and many of us as human beings are drawn to that even if we have conservative values.
So while I understand the 'outrage' some may have over this event, I'm kind of in the mind of saying, "So what?
How is this different from the rest of the world and how they advertise their products and services?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836247</id>
	<title>Good news, boys: we're getting lap dances!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256231100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bad news: It's from Carol Bartz.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bad news : It 's from Carol Bartz .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bad news: It's from Carol Bartz.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836233</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the problem?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256231040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see these strippers grinding their crotches on any women here so fail to see your point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see these strippers grinding their crotches on any women here so fail to see your point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see these strippers grinding their crotches on any women here so fail to see your point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835625</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835431</id>
	<title>best publicity!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've started seeing Yahoo advertising on roadsides and there may well be on tv (I hardly have time to watch anything 'live')... but isn't this an excellent PR stunt? How many people are actually offended by this?! Who are they apologising to?! In the meantime, all red-blooded males would tip their hat or nod in the most awesome approval and want to come to the next session!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've started seeing Yahoo advertising on roadsides and there may well be on tv ( I hardly have time to watch anything 'live ' ) ... but is n't this an excellent PR stunt ?
How many people are actually offended by this ? !
Who are they apologising to ? !
In the meantime , all red-blooded males would tip their hat or nod in the most awesome approval and want to come to the next session !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've started seeing Yahoo advertising on roadsides and there may well be on tv (I hardly have time to watch anything 'live')... but isn't this an excellent PR stunt?
How many people are actually offended by this?!
Who are they apologising to?!
In the meantime, all red-blooded males would tip their hat or nod in the most awesome approval and want to come to the next session!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836357</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>Larryish</author>
	<datestamp>1256231640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More likely to be jealousy disguised as disgust.</htmltext>
<tokenext>More likely to be jealousy disguised as disgust .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More likely to be jealousy disguised as disgust.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837745</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256237280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A measly 10 percent? Fuck them if they're so sensitive. I don't mind all the gay porn when I go to my workplace.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A measly 10 percent ?
Fuck them if they 're so sensitive .
I do n't mind all the gay porn when I go to my workplace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A measly 10 percent?
Fuck them if they're so sensitive.
I don't mind all the gay porn when I go to my workplace.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838711</id>
	<title>Re:Kid in the white shirt looks akward</title>
	<author>s4m7</author>
	<datestamp>1256241660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suspect he skipped the reading and just looked at the pictures.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect he skipped the reading and just looked at the pictures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect he skipped the reading and just looked at the pictures.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839669</id>
	<title>None of those women are free to speak...</title>
	<author>jeko</author>
	<datestamp>1256203440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, sure, the few women who've managed to get hired there are going to be just chomping at the bit to tell the world what stupid jackasses their bosses are.</p><p>The few women over there who have been interviewed are not going to commit career suicide by opening their mouths.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , sure , the few women who 've managed to get hired there are going to be just chomping at the bit to tell the world what stupid jackasses their bosses are.The few women over there who have been interviewed are not going to commit career suicide by opening their mouths .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, sure, the few women who've managed to get hired there are going to be just chomping at the bit to tell the world what stupid jackasses their bosses are.The few women over there who have been interviewed are not going to commit career suicide by opening their mouths.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836417</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838105</id>
	<title>Re:best publicity!</title>
	<author>VoidCrow</author>
	<datestamp>1256238660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought it was sordid and naff, and makes you 'red-blooded males' look like the sex junkies a few of you unfortunately are. It's your choice if you want to participate in this kind of pavlovian shit, clearly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it was sordid and naff , and makes you 'red-blooded males ' look like the sex junkies a few of you unfortunately are .
It 's your choice if you want to participate in this kind of pavlovian shit , clearly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it was sordid and naff, and makes you 'red-blooded males' look like the sex junkies a few of you unfortunately are.
It's your choice if you want to participate in this kind of pavlovian shit, clearly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835431</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29840575</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256208300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought "personal life" just meant I got to code from home... theres more?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought " personal life " just meant I got to code from home... theres more ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought "personal life" just meant I got to code from home... theres more?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836199</id>
	<title>Re:The Fucking Crybabies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256230860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, so Yahoo should apologize for not also having male strippers for the female attendants? I for one do not want women in the IT and computer science field who can't handle themselves around a couple of nerds who look more perplexed than aroused when given a show lap dance. If you're that easily offended, stay away. Self confident women don't make such lame excuses for not entering a profession.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , so Yahoo should apologize for not also having male strippers for the female attendants ?
I for one do not want women in the IT and computer science field who ca n't handle themselves around a couple of nerds who look more perplexed than aroused when given a show lap dance .
If you 're that easily offended , stay away .
Self confident women do n't make such lame excuses for not entering a profession .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, so Yahoo should apologize for not also having male strippers for the female attendants?
I for one do not want women in the IT and computer science field who can't handle themselves around a couple of nerds who look more perplexed than aroused when given a show lap dance.
If you're that easily offended, stay away.
Self confident women don't make such lame excuses for not entering a profession.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836113</id>
	<title>Re:Kid in the white shirt looks akward</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1256230440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's because there's a sexy woman dancing around his lap, trying to turn him on, and yet there's a big guy in the corner who'll kick his ass and throw him out if he looks like he's about to touch her.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's because there 's a sexy woman dancing around his lap , trying to turn him on , and yet there 's a big guy in the corner who 'll kick his ass and throw him out if he looks like he 's about to touch her .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's because there's a sexy woman dancing around his lap, trying to turn him on, and yet there's a big guy in the corner who'll kick his ass and throw him out if he looks like he's about to touch her.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835897</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256229540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>women engineers would be present</i> <br> <br>
Thats OK, they all wear comfortable shoes<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>women engineers would be present Thats OK , they all wear comfortable shoes : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>women engineers would be present  
Thats OK, they all wear comfortable shoes :-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836803</id>
	<title>I think it's absolutely disgusting...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256233500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>... that higher resolution photos were not available. A tech event, and shitty low-res photos are the best we could get? Where's the 10 mega pixel up-skirt shot?
<br>Also, the objectification of women evil blah blah etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... that higher resolution photos were not available .
A tech event , and shitty low-res photos are the best we could get ?
Where 's the 10 mega pixel up-skirt shot ?
Also , the objectification of women evil blah blah etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... that higher resolution photos were not available.
A tech event, and shitty low-res photos are the best we could get?
Where's the 10 mega pixel up-skirt shot?
Also, the objectification of women evil blah blah etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836123</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256230500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Furthermore, did they think that there was some way that women attendees would be perfectly comfortable watching other women objectified on a stage?</p></div><p>Like straight men everywhere, they were probably hoping for an enthusiastic "Yes!" to that question.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Furthermore , did they think that there was some way that women attendees would be perfectly comfortable watching other women objectified on a stage ? Like straight men everywhere , they were probably hoping for an enthusiastic " Yes !
" to that question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Furthermore, did they think that there was some way that women attendees would be perfectly comfortable watching other women objectified on a stage?Like straight men everywhere, they were probably hoping for an enthusiastic "Yes!
" to that question.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836271</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256231220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Beats a bald, chubby, sweaty guy jumping up and down on stage and screaming "Developers!" over and over again...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Beats a bald , chubby , sweaty guy jumping up and down on stage and screaming " Developers !
" over and over again.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Beats a bald, chubby, sweaty guy jumping up and down on stage and screaming "Developers!
" over and over again...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838479</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the problem?</title>
	<author>bkr1\_2k</author>
	<datestamp>1256240400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe women in the US are, and that is very dependent upon the woman I might add, but in cultures where bar dancers are commonplace most women don't even notice them... any more than the men do.  This is a non-event in so many ways it's appalling that <i>anyone</i> gives a shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe women in the US are , and that is very dependent upon the woman I might add , but in cultures where bar dancers are commonplace most women do n't even notice them... any more than the men do .
This is a non-event in so many ways it 's appalling that anyone gives a shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe women in the US are, and that is very dependent upon the woman I might add, but in cultures where bar dancers are commonplace most women don't even notice them... any more than the men do.
This is a non-event in so many ways it's appalling that anyone gives a shit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836917</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835481</id>
	<title>And so?</title>
	<author>Vinegar Joe</author>
	<datestamp>1256227860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In June go to Computex in Taipei.......lots of hardware and scantily dressed Taiwanese girls. A geek paradise.</p><p><a href="http://www.computextaipei.com.tw/" title="computextaipei.com.tw">http://www.computextaipei.com.tw/</a> [computextaipei.com.tw]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In June go to Computex in Taipei.......lots of hardware and scantily dressed Taiwanese girls .
A geek paradise.http : //www.computextaipei.com.tw/ [ computextaipei.com.tw ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In June go to Computex in Taipei.......lots of hardware and scantily dressed Taiwanese girls.
A geek paradise.http://www.computextaipei.com.tw/ [computextaipei.com.tw]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838051</id>
	<title>Re:Oblig. Bloodhound Gang reference</title>
	<author>skiman1979</author>
	<datestamp>1256238420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and she has about as much teeth as a jack-o-lantern?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and she has about as much teeth as a jack-o-lantern ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and she has about as much teeth as a jack-o-lantern?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835357</id>
	<title>New proposed functions for YUI</title>
	<author>Anonymusing</author>
	<datestamp>1256227380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.stripper(): slowly removes the HTML elements of your page, revealing something naughty underneath.
</p><p>.poleDance(): automatically adds a vertical navigation bar to your site, then teases you when you want to click on something
</p><p>.Titillate(): a replacement for<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.Console(), to make sure the programmer is, um, "properly aware" of script feedback</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.stripper ( ) : slowly removes the HTML elements of your page , revealing something naughty underneath .
.poleDance ( ) : automatically adds a vertical navigation bar to your site , then teases you when you want to click on something .Titillate ( ) : a replacement for .Console ( ) , to make sure the programmer is , um , " properly aware " of script feedback</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.stripper(): slowly removes the HTML elements of your page, revealing something naughty underneath.
.poleDance(): automatically adds a vertical navigation bar to your site, then teases you when you want to click on something
.Titillate(): a replacement for .Console(), to make sure the programmer is, um, "properly aware" of script feedback</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836051</id>
	<title>Re:The Fucking Crybabies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256230200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh my..</p><p>You're so backward!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh my..You 're so backward !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh my..You're so backward!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836395</id>
	<title>Re:It is Taiwan....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256231880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... There it is considered positively old fashioned and prudish to stop with just lap dances. The competition is sure to be offering a lot more.</p></div><p>I find your ideas intriguing and would like to subscribe to your newsletter</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... There it is considered positively old fashioned and prudish to stop with just lap dances .
The competition is sure to be offering a lot more.I find your ideas intriguing and would like to subscribe to your newsletter</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... There it is considered positively old fashioned and prudish to stop with just lap dances.
The competition is sure to be offering a lot more.I find your ideas intriguing and would like to subscribe to your newsletter
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835703</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836597</id>
	<title>Re:The Fucking Crybabies</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1256232660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please, that;s stupid.<br>A) No one was forced to<br>B) Anyone could ahve gotten one<br>C) It's socially acceptable there.</p><p>Seriously, people need to grow up an realize that if it doesn't impact them they need to ignore it.<br>What next? no one can eat meaat at work because it might offend a vegan?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please , that ; s stupid.A ) No one was forced toB ) Anyone could ahve gotten oneC ) It 's socially acceptable there.Seriously , people need to grow up an realize that if it does n't impact them they need to ignore it.What next ?
no one can eat meaat at work because it might offend a vegan ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please, that;s stupid.A) No one was forced toB) Anyone could ahve gotten oneC) It's socially acceptable there.Seriously, people need to grow up an realize that if it doesn't impact them they need to ignore it.What next?
no one can eat meaat at work because it might offend a vegan?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835209</id>
	<title>Company Issued Laptop</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256226780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now that's a nice company issued laptop.  ZING!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that 's a nice company issued laptop .
ZING !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that's a nice company issued laptop.
ZING!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29840299</id>
	<title>Re:The Fucking Crybabies</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1256206920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Replying twice to the same post, but something struck me:</p><blockquote><div><p>but his point is that for an industry that's always trying to attract women</p></div></blockquote><p>You are confused, you think that a bunch of geeks who are socially inept who would like to have more women in the office to hit on and learn how to hit on, want women in the field.</p><p>They don't want women in the field, they want women in the office, that they can talk to and socialize with, as they utterly fail to do so on their own.</p><p>They'd be just as happy with doctors, secretaries, or prison inmates if they were women and would talk to them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Replying twice to the same post , but something struck me : but his point is that for an industry that 's always trying to attract womenYou are confused , you think that a bunch of geeks who are socially inept who would like to have more women in the office to hit on and learn how to hit on , want women in the field.They do n't want women in the field , they want women in the office , that they can talk to and socialize with , as they utterly fail to do so on their own.They 'd be just as happy with doctors , secretaries , or prison inmates if they were women and would talk to them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Replying twice to the same post, but something struck me:but his point is that for an industry that's always trying to attract womenYou are confused, you think that a bunch of geeks who are socially inept who would like to have more women in the office to hit on and learn how to hit on, want women in the field.They don't want women in the field, they want women in the office, that they can talk to and socialize with, as they utterly fail to do so on their own.They'd be just as happy with doctors, secretaries, or prison inmates if they were women and would talk to them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835197</id>
	<title>shucks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256226720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Awesome. Wish I was there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Awesome .
Wish I was there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Awesome.
Wish I was there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836167</id>
	<title>3 Questions</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1256230680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1) Like the boobies said, "Why wasn't i invited?"</p><p>2) Why is at capitalized in the headline?</p><p>3) Did anyone else read the headline as "Someone offered lap dances to Yahoo at hack event"?  Most<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. headlines use passive voice (which i despise) so that's how i read it.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/better when the stripper is cryin'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) Like the boobies said , " Why was n't i invited ?
" 2 ) Why is at capitalized in the headline ? 3 ) Did anyone else read the headline as " Someone offered lap dances to Yahoo at hack event " ?
Most / .
headlines use passive voice ( which i despise ) so that 's how i read it .
/better when the stripper is cryin'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) Like the boobies said, "Why wasn't i invited?
"2) Why is at capitalized in the headline?3) Did anyone else read the headline as "Someone offered lap dances to Yahoo at hack event"?
Most /.
headlines use passive voice (which i despise) so that's how i read it.
/better when the stripper is cryin'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837131</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1256234940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uuum, who said that women would not get lap dances by men? Have you ever seen women, when a hot lap dancer is around?? They are even worse than men! And I really like them for it! At least one thing where they act like natural humans.</p><p>And about the technology field. Get this into the distorted reality in your head: <em>Women don't like engineering!!</em><br>Sure, there are exceptions. But women simply like other things. Because they are <em>women</em>!<br>Why would they have to run after male ideals. (Engineering as a ideal job for your life, is a male ideal, by the way!)</p><p>The best way to see what genders like, is to look at the smallest children, offer them toys for both genders, and see what they prefer to play with.<br>They actually tested this. And boys simply like to build, while girls like to care for others.</p><p>The only really weird thing is, that "building" somehow is seen as better than "caring". And the weirdest thing is, that the most hard-core feminists strongly support this very male-centered view on ideals.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uuum , who said that women would not get lap dances by men ?
Have you ever seen women , when a hot lap dancer is around ? ?
They are even worse than men !
And I really like them for it !
At least one thing where they act like natural humans.And about the technology field .
Get this into the distorted reality in your head : Women do n't like engineering !
! Sure , there are exceptions .
But women simply like other things .
Because they are women ! Why would they have to run after male ideals .
( Engineering as a ideal job for your life , is a male ideal , by the way !
) The best way to see what genders like , is to look at the smallest children , offer them toys for both genders , and see what they prefer to play with.They actually tested this .
And boys simply like to build , while girls like to care for others.The only really weird thing is , that " building " somehow is seen as better than " caring " .
And the weirdest thing is , that the most hard-core feminists strongly support this very male-centered view on ideals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uuum, who said that women would not get lap dances by men?
Have you ever seen women, when a hot lap dancer is around??
They are even worse than men!
And I really like them for it!
At least one thing where they act like natural humans.And about the technology field.
Get this into the distorted reality in your head: Women don't like engineering!
!Sure, there are exceptions.
But women simply like other things.
Because they are women!Why would they have to run after male ideals.
(Engineering as a ideal job for your life, is a male ideal, by the way!
)The best way to see what genders like, is to look at the smallest children, offer them toys for both genders, and see what they prefer to play with.They actually tested this.
And boys simply like to build, while girls like to care for others.The only really weird thing is, that "building" somehow is seen as better than "caring".
And the weirdest thing is, that the most hard-core feminists strongly support this very male-centered view on ideals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838957</id>
	<title>Re:The Fucking Crybabies</title>
	<author>stephanruby</author>
	<datestamp>1256242860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you want more women in the field, do things that attract them.</p></div><p>The female programmers I know can't get laid either, so I assume your suggestion is to just start bringing in some male strippers as well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want more women in the field , do things that attract them.The female programmers I know ca n't get laid either , so I assume your suggestion is to just start bringing in some male strippers as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want more women in the field, do things that attract them.The female programmers I know can't get laid either, so I assume your suggestion is to just start bringing in some male strippers as well.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837155</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>ZekoMal</author>
	<datestamp>1256235060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>-raises hand- I'm a woman and I woulda loved to go. Just sayin'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>-raises hand- I 'm a woman and I woulda loved to go .
Just sayin' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-raises hand- I'm a woman and I woulda loved to go.
Just sayin'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29843681</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256291340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well said!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well said !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well said!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836437</id>
	<title>In related news...</title>
	<author>TaggartAleslayer</author>
	<datestamp>1256232060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In support of Yahoo's Hack Day lap dancing success, Microsoft plans to send Steve Ballmer around the nation to spoon with potential Bing developers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In support of Yahoo 's Hack Day lap dancing success , Microsoft plans to send Steve Ballmer around the nation to spoon with potential Bing developers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In support of Yahoo's Hack Day lap dancing success, Microsoft plans to send Steve Ballmer around the nation to spoon with potential Bing developers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836855</id>
	<title>TFA was presented to you by Yahoo marketing!</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1256233740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously. How fucked up of a society do you have to be, to feel a urge to apologize for offering free lap dances??</p><p>Everybody, who would, on response to "Free lap dances for EVERYONE!!" not go "NO thanks! This is disgusting!", and yet acts like this is some dirty unacceptable thing, is a hypocrite, and should just shut up!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
How fucked up of a society do you have to be , to feel a urge to apologize for offering free lap dances ?
? Everybody , who would , on response to " Free lap dances for EVERYONE ! !
" not go " NO thanks !
This is disgusting !
" , and yet acts like this is some dirty unacceptable thing , is a hypocrite , and should just shut up !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
How fucked up of a society do you have to be, to feel a urge to apologize for offering free lap dances?
?Everybody, who would, on response to "Free lap dances for EVERYONE!!
" not go "NO thanks!
This is disgusting!
", and yet acts like this is some dirty unacceptable thing, is a hypocrite, and should just shut up!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836799</id>
	<title>Re:never apologize for sex</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256233500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And let me guess... She then moved on to some asshole who treats her like shit, and never apologizes even when he really should.</p><p>It's too bad that what attracts people romantically has so little do with what makes them happy in a long-term relationship. Women are attracted to tough guys, but would be happier with someone more sweet and understanding. Men are attracted to hot bodies, but a more average looking woman often has a much better personality to live with (less stuck up, less demanding, and more faithful.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And let me guess... She then moved on to some asshole who treats her like shit , and never apologizes even when he really should.It 's too bad that what attracts people romantically has so little do with what makes them happy in a long-term relationship .
Women are attracted to tough guys , but would be happier with someone more sweet and understanding .
Men are attracted to hot bodies , but a more average looking woman often has a much better personality to live with ( less stuck up , less demanding , and more faithful .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And let me guess... She then moved on to some asshole who treats her like shit, and never apologizes even when he really should.It's too bad that what attracts people romantically has so little do with what makes them happy in a long-term relationship.
Women are attracted to tough guys, but would be happier with someone more sweet and understanding.
Men are attracted to hot bodies, but a more average looking woman often has a much better personality to live with (less stuck up, less demanding, and more faithful.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835301</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835453</id>
	<title>Re:Apologize?</title>
	<author>BenEnglishAtHome</author>
	<datestamp>1256227740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p><i>Why?</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>Because they got caught.  It wouldn't do to have a good time and then be unapologetic about it.  We live in more enlightnened times, now, doncha know?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ?
Because they got caught .
It would n't do to have a good time and then be unapologetic about it .
We live in more enlightnened times , now , doncha know ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?
Because they got caught.
It wouldn't do to have a good time and then be unapologetic about it.
We live in more enlightnened times, now, doncha know?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835307</id>
	<title>Lap dance ON STAGE?</title>
	<author>Cthefuture</author>
	<datestamp>1256227140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who the hell would want a lap dance on a stage in front of tons of people.  That would be awkward and unpleasant even if you liked lap dances from strangers (rubbing their diseases all over you, heh).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who the hell would want a lap dance on a stage in front of tons of people .
That would be awkward and unpleasant even if you liked lap dances from strangers ( rubbing their diseases all over you , heh ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who the hell would want a lap dance on a stage in front of tons of people.
That would be awkward and unpleasant even if you liked lap dances from strangers (rubbing their diseases all over you, heh).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836773</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256233380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Typical American feminist point of Condemning  something that yu have  no wish to Understand.</p><p>I am  sure that Engineers are smart to know when to leave when  something becomes uncomfortable.   I also think that there might have been a few lesbian engineers.</p><p>There was an actually study into the question of obj.j.</p><p>They took women  and guys, when they show the women different pictures of guys and others general photos there  was  no difference.</p><p>When the guys went up. It was discovered that the the same spike happened, when looking women, was like looking at new tools</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Typical American feminist point of Condemning something that yu have no wish to Understand.I am sure that Engineers are smart to know when to leave when something becomes uncomfortable .
I also think that there might have been a few lesbian engineers.There was an actually study into the question of obj.j.They took women and guys , when they show the women different pictures of guys and others general photos there was no difference.When the guys went up .
It was discovered that the the same spike happened , when looking women , was like looking at new tools</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Typical American feminist point of Condemning  something that yu have  no wish to Understand.I am  sure that Engineers are smart to know when to leave when  something becomes uncomfortable.
I also think that there might have been a few lesbian engineers.There was an actually study into the question of obj.j.They took women  and guys, when they show the women different pictures of guys and others general photos there  was  no difference.When the guys went up.
It was discovered that the the same spike happened, when looking women, was like looking at new tools</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303</id>
	<title>Apologize?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836955</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256234100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lap dancers are hardly standard features of programming conferences and thus hardly representative of "the Information Technology field", which is why this is news. And women shouldn't have a problem with it because it's 'women being objectified' because a) being offended just because it's women would be sexist and ironically so and b) the word "objectify" has been stretched and abused so much it doesn't really seem to have much meaning anymore. The real problem is there is a time and place for things, and this sort of event is neither the time nor the place for half-naked women shaking their half-naked bits in front of you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lap dancers are hardly standard features of programming conferences and thus hardly representative of " the Information Technology field " , which is why this is news .
And women should n't have a problem with it because it 's 'women being objectified ' because a ) being offended just because it 's women would be sexist and ironically so and b ) the word " objectify " has been stretched and abused so much it does n't really seem to have much meaning anymore .
The real problem is there is a time and place for things , and this sort of event is neither the time nor the place for half-naked women shaking their half-naked bits in front of you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lap dancers are hardly standard features of programming conferences and thus hardly representative of "the Information Technology field", which is why this is news.
And women shouldn't have a problem with it because it's 'women being objectified' because a) being offended just because it's women would be sexist and ironically so and b) the word "objectify" has been stretched and abused so much it doesn't really seem to have much meaning anymore.
The real problem is there is a time and place for things, and this sort of event is neither the time nor the place for half-naked women shaking their half-naked bits in front of you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835371</id>
	<title>Must not read Fark before Slashdot</title>
	<author>The Archon V2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1256227440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because I read the headline as some hick/yahoo stumbling onto a hack event and being offered a lap dance by... someone. It was dredging up some incredibly disturbing images that were half Deliverance and half cosplay gone horribly horribly wrong.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because I read the headline as some hick/yahoo stumbling onto a hack event and being offered a lap dance by... someone. It was dredging up some incredibly disturbing images that were half Deliverance and half cosplay gone horribly horribly wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because I read the headline as some hick/yahoo stumbling onto a hack event and being offered a lap dance by... someone. It was dredging up some incredibly disturbing images that were half Deliverance and half cosplay gone horribly horribly wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835625</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the problem?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256228340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't find lap dances morally objectionable. If this were an after-event thing, and they had entertainment for ALL of the attendees, not just the heterosexual men who enjoy lap dances, then it might have been OK. I think what's worse is having scantily clad women in the brainstorming sessions. At best, it's distracting. At worst, it makes people uncomfortable (especially any women who might have been attending). Since this is Slashdot - Yes, there are women here, and yes, there are women programmers.</p><p>Lots of guys here are saying people need to lighten up about it. Next time you're in a meeting, hire a couple male strippers to walk around and grind their crotches against the back of your head or something. See how comfortable you are with that, and how productive the meeting is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't find lap dances morally objectionable .
If this were an after-event thing , and they had entertainment for ALL of the attendees , not just the heterosexual men who enjoy lap dances , then it might have been OK. I think what 's worse is having scantily clad women in the brainstorming sessions .
At best , it 's distracting .
At worst , it makes people uncomfortable ( especially any women who might have been attending ) .
Since this is Slashdot - Yes , there are women here , and yes , there are women programmers.Lots of guys here are saying people need to lighten up about it .
Next time you 're in a meeting , hire a couple male strippers to walk around and grind their crotches against the back of your head or something .
See how comfortable you are with that , and how productive the meeting is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't find lap dances morally objectionable.
If this were an after-event thing, and they had entertainment for ALL of the attendees, not just the heterosexual men who enjoy lap dances, then it might have been OK. I think what's worse is having scantily clad women in the brainstorming sessions.
At best, it's distracting.
At worst, it makes people uncomfortable (especially any women who might have been attending).
Since this is Slashdot - Yes, there are women here, and yes, there are women programmers.Lots of guys here are saying people need to lighten up about it.
Next time you're in a meeting, hire a couple male strippers to walk around and grind their crotches against the back of your head or something.
See how comfortable you are with that, and how productive the meeting is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29842559</id>
	<title>Re:never apologize for sex</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256228220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, the woosy line was just a ditch.  She dropped you cause you're ugly.</p><p>Occam's Razor, dude.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , the woosy line was just a ditch .
She dropped you cause you 're ugly.Occam 's Razor , dude .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, the woosy line was just a ditch.
She dropped you cause you're ugly.Occam's Razor, dude.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835301</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29840401</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>Areyoukiddingme</author>
	<datestamp>1256207460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's been five hours since this was posted, and it's been modded up to +4, and there's not one single reply disputing the possibility that a woman posted to Slashdot.  Not one "there are no women on the Internet" response.</p><p>I'll be darned.  It IS possible for a slashdot cliche to die.  Who'd have thunk it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's been five hours since this was posted , and it 's been modded up to + 4 , and there 's not one single reply disputing the possibility that a woman posted to Slashdot .
Not one " there are no women on the Internet " response.I 'll be darned .
It IS possible for a slashdot cliche to die .
Who 'd have thunk it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's been five hours since this was posted, and it's been modded up to +4, and there's not one single reply disputing the possibility that a woman posted to Slashdot.
Not one "there are no women on the Internet" response.I'll be darned.
It IS possible for a slashdot cliche to die.
Who'd have thunk it...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836979</id>
	<title>Here's the trick</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256234160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get a dancer to chat to you for ages while she gives you the sales pitch so she can give you a dance.  Hold her off as long as you can, milk the conversation long enough, don't compliment her until she's earned it, then get her number and arrange to meet her when her shift ends. But on no account do you let her give you a dance, play hard to get.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get a dancer to chat to you for ages while she gives you the sales pitch so she can give you a dance .
Hold her off as long as you can , milk the conversation long enough , do n't compliment her until she 's earned it , then get her number and arrange to meet her when her shift ends .
But on no account do you let her give you a dance , play hard to get .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get a dancer to chat to you for ages while she gives you the sales pitch so she can give you a dance.
Hold her off as long as you can, milk the conversation long enough, don't compliment her until she's earned it, then get her number and arrange to meet her when her shift ends.
But on no account do you let her give you a dance, play hard to get.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836171</id>
	<title>Sigh</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1256230680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll bet they wonder why they have so few female developers...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll bet they wonder why they have so few female developers.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll bet they wonder why they have so few female developers...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838207</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256239080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Every single one of us "objectifies" ALL of our sex partners or potential sex partners at some point in time. Women are "objectified" as a comparison to other available members of their sex or gender, as a part of an evaluation we MUST go thorugh and are ENTITLED to go through as one of our basic delights in the choosing of the direction of our future genes.</p><p>Women who are initially objectified for their looks don't stay objectified for long, unless the man doing the choosing is vapid. But the tendency to first judge women visually is innate to the male and only a country full of neurotics like ours could find a way to take issue with that most basic of evaluations which is the very reason we are all here today. You will probably live to 80 because a thousand of your ancestors objectified your female ancestors to make sure they weren't turning their family tree into a stump with disease and inferior genetics.</p><p>Not only that, but when you are judging a woman based on her looks, you are judging a lot more than just some random lottery of "fuckability." You are judging her self-esteem, outlook, pride, exercise habits, eating habits, courage...it's not 100\% accurate but girls who look good usually end up that way because they have their shit together, which makes them attractive. So "objectifying" a woman based on looks is really more trying to get a read on whether she is about to crash and burn, or whether she is a rising star who will be uplifting to associate with.</p><p>What's more, women objectify men all the time, but far less press is paid to the objectification of men as "success objects." A girl says she wants to marry a DOCTOR, and noone is there to scream at her "That is objectifying men! Think of the poor garbage men whom you are ruling out, you insensitive clod!"</p><p>I take issue with neither form of "sexist objectification" myself. I feel people's romantic, genetic and breeding choices are deeply private and none of my business.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every single one of us " objectifies " ALL of our sex partners or potential sex partners at some point in time .
Women are " objectified " as a comparison to other available members of their sex or gender , as a part of an evaluation we MUST go thorugh and are ENTITLED to go through as one of our basic delights in the choosing of the direction of our future genes.Women who are initially objectified for their looks do n't stay objectified for long , unless the man doing the choosing is vapid .
But the tendency to first judge women visually is innate to the male and only a country full of neurotics like ours could find a way to take issue with that most basic of evaluations which is the very reason we are all here today .
You will probably live to 80 because a thousand of your ancestors objectified your female ancestors to make sure they were n't turning their family tree into a stump with disease and inferior genetics.Not only that , but when you are judging a woman based on her looks , you are judging a lot more than just some random lottery of " fuckability .
" You are judging her self-esteem , outlook , pride , exercise habits , eating habits , courage...it 's not 100 \ % accurate but girls who look good usually end up that way because they have their shit together , which makes them attractive .
So " objectifying " a woman based on looks is really more trying to get a read on whether she is about to crash and burn , or whether she is a rising star who will be uplifting to associate with.What 's more , women objectify men all the time , but far less press is paid to the objectification of men as " success objects .
" A girl says she wants to marry a DOCTOR , and noone is there to scream at her " That is objectifying men !
Think of the poor garbage men whom you are ruling out , you insensitive clod !
" I take issue with neither form of " sexist objectification " myself .
I feel people 's romantic , genetic and breeding choices are deeply private and none of my business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every single one of us "objectifies" ALL of our sex partners or potential sex partners at some point in time.
Women are "objectified" as a comparison to other available members of their sex or gender, as a part of an evaluation we MUST go thorugh and are ENTITLED to go through as one of our basic delights in the choosing of the direction of our future genes.Women who are initially objectified for their looks don't stay objectified for long, unless the man doing the choosing is vapid.
But the tendency to first judge women visually is innate to the male and only a country full of neurotics like ours could find a way to take issue with that most basic of evaluations which is the very reason we are all here today.
You will probably live to 80 because a thousand of your ancestors objectified your female ancestors to make sure they weren't turning their family tree into a stump with disease and inferior genetics.Not only that, but when you are judging a woman based on her looks, you are judging a lot more than just some random lottery of "fuckability.
" You are judging her self-esteem, outlook, pride, exercise habits, eating habits, courage...it's not 100\% accurate but girls who look good usually end up that way because they have their shit together, which makes them attractive.
So "objectifying" a woman based on looks is really more trying to get a read on whether she is about to crash and burn, or whether she is a rising star who will be uplifting to associate with.What's more, women objectify men all the time, but far less press is paid to the objectification of men as "success objects.
" A girl says she wants to marry a DOCTOR, and noone is there to scream at her "That is objectifying men!
Think of the poor garbage men whom you are ruling out, you insensitive clod!
"I take issue with neither form of "sexist objectification" myself.
I feel people's romantic, genetic and breeding choices are deeply private and none of my business.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835691</id>
	<title>Re:never apologize for sex</title>
	<author>idontgno</author>
	<datestamp>1256228640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>I think it's safe to say that there's a substantial percentage of readers who are wondering: what is wrong with you?</i> </p><p>Then a substantial percentage of the readership doesn't recognize "playing hard to get", AKA "coy". It can be a good strategy when applied appropriately. In this case, as long as the mood is right, and the apology isn't particularly sincere. And accompanying a sly smile.</p><p>OTOH, if the apology is breathlessly panicky and flop-sweatingly sincere, then "what is wrong with you" is entirely apropos.</p><p> <i>kissing is not sex.</i> </p><p>In the immortal words of lolcat, "ur doin it rong"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's safe to say that there 's a substantial percentage of readers who are wondering : what is wrong with you ?
Then a substantial percentage of the readership does n't recognize " playing hard to get " , AKA " coy " .
It can be a good strategy when applied appropriately .
In this case , as long as the mood is right , and the apology is n't particularly sincere .
And accompanying a sly smile.OTOH , if the apology is breathlessly panicky and flop-sweatingly sincere , then " what is wrong with you " is entirely apropos .
kissing is not sex .
In the immortal words of lolcat , " ur doin it rong "</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I think it's safe to say that there's a substantial percentage of readers who are wondering: what is wrong with you?
Then a substantial percentage of the readership doesn't recognize "playing hard to get", AKA "coy".
It can be a good strategy when applied appropriately.
In this case, as long as the mood is right, and the apology isn't particularly sincere.
And accompanying a sly smile.OTOH, if the apology is breathlessly panicky and flop-sweatingly sincere, then "what is wrong with you" is entirely apropos.
kissing is not sex.
In the immortal words of lolcat, "ur doin it rong"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835549</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838823</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the problem?</title>
	<author>mdarksbane</author>
	<datestamp>1256242140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SOME women are offended by these things. SOME women find them amusing, or have no real opinion.</p><p>Now... that doesn't mean that if you want to attract those women to an event, you shouldn't do things that will offend them. But that's universal logic, not something specific to half-naked women.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SOME women are offended by these things .
SOME women find them amusing , or have no real opinion.Now... that does n't mean that if you want to attract those women to an event , you should n't do things that will offend them .
But that 's universal logic , not something specific to half-naked women .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SOME women are offended by these things.
SOME women find them amusing, or have no real opinion.Now... that doesn't mean that if you want to attract those women to an event, you shouldn't do things that will offend them.
But that's universal logic, not something specific to half-naked women.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836917</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29840605</id>
	<title>Re:never apologize for sex</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256208480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you tried brushing your teeth occasionally?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you tried brushing your teeth occasionally ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you tried brushing your teeth occasionally?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835301</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836195</id>
	<title>Re:The Fucking Crybabies</title>
	<author>i0lanthe</author>
	<datestamp>1256230860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think females decide pretty early on (like grade school) whether they want to enter math / science / technical fields.  That part needs fixing if we are going to continue to change the gender proportion.  However, having decided to enter CS, I sure as shooting would not work for, support, or attend companies/organizations/events where stuff like that happens.  I'm sitting around thinking "how about equal pay for equal work" and they're thinking "how about free lap dances!"  Not a match made in heaven when I could work for a company NOT run by (apparently) cavemen who are thinking with their stones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think females decide pretty early on ( like grade school ) whether they want to enter math / science / technical fields .
That part needs fixing if we are going to continue to change the gender proportion .
However , having decided to enter CS , I sure as shooting would not work for , support , or attend companies/organizations/events where stuff like that happens .
I 'm sitting around thinking " how about equal pay for equal work " and they 're thinking " how about free lap dances !
" Not a match made in heaven when I could work for a company NOT run by ( apparently ) cavemen who are thinking with their stones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think females decide pretty early on (like grade school) whether they want to enter math / science / technical fields.
That part needs fixing if we are going to continue to change the gender proportion.
However, having decided to enter CS, I sure as shooting would not work for, support, or attend companies/organizations/events where stuff like that happens.
I'm sitting around thinking "how about equal pay for equal work" and they're thinking "how about free lap dances!
"  Not a match made in heaven when I could work for a company NOT run by (apparently) cavemen who are thinking with their stones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838847</id>
	<title>Re:never apologize for sex</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256242320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe your kissing just sucks?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe your kissing just sucks ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe your kissing just sucks?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835301</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29840511</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256207940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>well, it all depends on your profession.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>well , it all depends on your profession .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well, it all depends on your profession.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836929</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1256233980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why should anyone care that there were women there?  Would men have cared if there were male dancers for the female (or gay) attendees?  If you're male and would have objected to that, you're a jerk and should stop interfering with other people's fun.  Same goes for the female attendees. I don't think there's anything sexist about that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why should anyone care that there were women there ?
Would men have cared if there were male dancers for the female ( or gay ) attendees ?
If you 're male and would have objected to that , you 're a jerk and should stop interfering with other people 's fun .
Same goes for the female attendees .
I do n't think there 's anything sexist about that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why should anyone care that there were women there?
Would men have cared if there were male dancers for the female (or gay) attendees?
If you're male and would have objected to that, you're a jerk and should stop interfering with other people's fun.
Same goes for the female attendees.
I don't think there's anything sexist about that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835571</id>
	<title>Yahoo and privacy</title>
	<author>Krneki</author>
	<datestamp>1256228160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Again a great idea implemented poorly.<br><br>Give people some privacy ffs! Having your shit posted all over the Internet is lame.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Again a great idea implemented poorly.Give people some privacy ffs !
Having your shit posted all over the Internet is lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Again a great idea implemented poorly.Give people some privacy ffs!
Having your shit posted all over the Internet is lame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837075</id>
	<title>Re:It is Taiwan....</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1256234520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean they're not like Japan, with rubber pussies and school girls' panties, sold from vending machines?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean they 're not like Japan , with rubber pussies and school girls ' panties , sold from vending machines ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean they're not like Japan, with rubber pussies and school girls' panties, sold from vending machines?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835703</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837591</id>
	<title>Re:Company Issued Laptop</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256236740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now that's a nice company issued laptop.  SCHWING!</p></div><p>Fixed that for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that 's a nice company issued laptop .
SCHWING ! Fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that's a nice company issued laptop.
SCHWING!Fixed that for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835209</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836009</id>
	<title>Why on earth are they mad...</title>
	<author>Pvt\_Ryan</author>
	<datestamp>1256230020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wish my company would pay for me to have lap dances..</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish my company would pay for me to have lap dances. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish my company would pay for me to have lap dances..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839799</id>
	<title>Re:The Fucking Crybabies</title>
	<author>pinkushun</author>
	<datestamp>1256204160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Very, very good point. On a related note: They could've used the stripper money to hire chip 'n dales for the girls instead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Very , very good point .
On a related note : They could 've used the stripper money to hire chip 'n dales for the girls instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very, very good point.
On a related note: They could've used the stripper money to hire chip 'n dales for the girls instead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29840161</id>
	<title>Re:The Fucking Crybabies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256206080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you happen to be morally opposed to this kind of offer then just don't take it!</p><p>Jeez, what a big child-care facility the world has become.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you happen to be morally opposed to this kind of offer then just do n't take it ! Jeez , what a big child-care facility the world has become .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you happen to be morally opposed to this kind of offer then just don't take it!Jeez, what a big child-care facility the world has become.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29843977</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1256296260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> A lot of them thought it was funny watching the awkward guys up on stage going through having a girl dance next to them. Even more said they didn't even notice what was going on on stage.</p></div><p>How is what the women said about these activities not negative? Funny is laughing at awkward people? They didn't even notice what was happening on stage? Come on, it's a stage. If people don't notice what happening, that's not a good thing. A stage is supposed to draw attention.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of them thought it was funny watching the awkward guys up on stage going through having a girl dance next to them .
Even more said they did n't even notice what was going on on stage.How is what the women said about these activities not negative ?
Funny is laughing at awkward people ?
They did n't even notice what was happening on stage ?
Come on , it 's a stage .
If people do n't notice what happening , that 's not a good thing .
A stage is supposed to draw attention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> A lot of them thought it was funny watching the awkward guys up on stage going through having a girl dance next to them.
Even more said they didn't even notice what was going on on stage.How is what the women said about these activities not negative?
Funny is laughing at awkward people?
They didn't even notice what was happening on stage?
Come on, it's a stage.
If people don't notice what happening, that's not a good thing.
A stage is supposed to draw attention.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836417</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837531</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>billcopc</author>
	<datestamp>1256236500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No one is holding a gun to these women's heads.  They willingly engage in sexually suggestive behaviour in exchange for money.  It is a perfectly legal thing to do.</p><p>Would you react differently if they had been male entertainers ?  Now, now; don't be a hypocrite!</p><p>In the end, Yahoo hired "booth babes", like we see at every other tech event, where they are usually tasked with holding up some new gadget or delivering a marketing pitch.  If you're so opposed to the practice (I am, though for entirely different reasons), why don't you go harass the E3 and CES organizers and participants too ?  Why only Yahoo ?</p><p>You talk about women not being comfortable in our field, presumably because the guys are socially inept or even hostile.  What about men being uncomfortable, from having to work with other socially inept guys ?  I don't need someone to flirt with me, in order to think of them as pathetic self-centered losers.  Women can be unpleasant too, you know.  Sex/gender has nothing to do with it.  I don't care what a coworker has between their legs.  I don't go to work to get laid; I go to work to get Paid.  The lack of women in my workplace doesn't have any adverse effect on my productivity.</p><p>Political correctness is bullshit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No one is holding a gun to these women 's heads .
They willingly engage in sexually suggestive behaviour in exchange for money .
It is a perfectly legal thing to do.Would you react differently if they had been male entertainers ?
Now , now ; do n't be a hypocrite ! In the end , Yahoo hired " booth babes " , like we see at every other tech event , where they are usually tasked with holding up some new gadget or delivering a marketing pitch .
If you 're so opposed to the practice ( I am , though for entirely different reasons ) , why do n't you go harass the E3 and CES organizers and participants too ?
Why only Yahoo ? You talk about women not being comfortable in our field , presumably because the guys are socially inept or even hostile .
What about men being uncomfortable , from having to work with other socially inept guys ?
I do n't need someone to flirt with me , in order to think of them as pathetic self-centered losers .
Women can be unpleasant too , you know .
Sex/gender has nothing to do with it .
I do n't care what a coworker has between their legs .
I do n't go to work to get laid ; I go to work to get Paid .
The lack of women in my workplace does n't have any adverse effect on my productivity.Political correctness is bullshit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one is holding a gun to these women's heads.
They willingly engage in sexually suggestive behaviour in exchange for money.
It is a perfectly legal thing to do.Would you react differently if they had been male entertainers ?
Now, now; don't be a hypocrite!In the end, Yahoo hired "booth babes", like we see at every other tech event, where they are usually tasked with holding up some new gadget or delivering a marketing pitch.
If you're so opposed to the practice (I am, though for entirely different reasons), why don't you go harass the E3 and CES organizers and participants too ?
Why only Yahoo ?You talk about women not being comfortable in our field, presumably because the guys are socially inept or even hostile.
What about men being uncomfortable, from having to work with other socially inept guys ?
I don't need someone to flirt with me, in order to think of them as pathetic self-centered losers.
Women can be unpleasant too, you know.
Sex/gender has nothing to do with it.
I don't care what a coworker has between their legs.
I don't go to work to get laid; I go to work to get Paid.
The lack of women in my workplace doesn't have any adverse effect on my productivity.Political correctness is bullshit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838061</id>
	<title>Yet another embarassment...</title>
	<author>FirstTimeCaller</author>
	<datestamp>1256238480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>for Microsoft marketing...  Yahoo! gives developers lap dances, but what do they get from Microsoft?  They get Steve Balmer prancing around the stage yelling "developers, developers, developers".  I guess it could have been worse -- MS could have given them lap dances... from Steve Balmer!</htmltext>
<tokenext>for Microsoft marketing... Yahoo ! gives developers lap dances , but what do they get from Microsoft ?
They get Steve Balmer prancing around the stage yelling " developers , developers , developers " .
I guess it could have been worse -- MS could have given them lap dances... from Steve Balmer !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for Microsoft marketing...  Yahoo! gives developers lap dances, but what do they get from Microsoft?
They get Steve Balmer prancing around the stage yelling "developers, developers, developers".
I guess it could have been worse -- MS could have given them lap dances... from Steve Balmer!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835433</id>
	<title>Nice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whoever said there aren't hot chicks working in IT.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whoever said there are n't hot chicks working in IT .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whoever said there aren't hot chicks working in IT.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835353</id>
	<title>Remember!</title>
	<author>lupinstel</author>
	<datestamp>1256227320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No penetration testing in the champagne room!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No penetration testing in the champagne room !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No penetration testing in the champagne room!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835751</id>
	<title>Re:Lap dance ON STAGE?</title>
	<author>Red Flayer</author>
	<datestamp>1256228880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Who the hell would want a lap dance on a stage in front of tons of people. That would be awkward and unpleasant even if you liked lap dances from strangers (rubbing their diseases all over you, heh).</p></div></blockquote><p>Some people actually dig that sort of thing.  <br> <br>In my case, it would be awkward only because I'd feel guilty about making all the men in the crowd feel inferior because of the size of the bulge in my pants.<br> <br>(No one needs to tell them that I stole a paper-towel tube from the kitchenette just prior to the lapdance).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who the hell would want a lap dance on a stage in front of tons of people .
That would be awkward and unpleasant even if you liked lap dances from strangers ( rubbing their diseases all over you , heh ) .Some people actually dig that sort of thing .
In my case , it would be awkward only because I 'd feel guilty about making all the men in the crowd feel inferior because of the size of the bulge in my pants .
( No one needs to tell them that I stole a paper-towel tube from the kitchenette just prior to the lapdance ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who the hell would want a lap dance on a stage in front of tons of people.
That would be awkward and unpleasant even if you liked lap dances from strangers (rubbing their diseases all over you, heh).Some people actually dig that sort of thing.
In my case, it would be awkward only because I'd feel guilty about making all the men in the crowd feel inferior because of the size of the bulge in my pants.
(No one needs to tell them that I stole a paper-towel tube from the kitchenette just prior to the lapdance).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836259</id>
	<title>Re:Lap dance ON STAGE?</title>
	<author>jim\_v2000</author>
	<datestamp>1256231160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you notice the other people you're doing it wrong.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you notice the other people you 're doing it wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you notice the other people you're doing it wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836527</id>
	<title>Re:never apologize for sex</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1256232420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And she was right to do so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And she was right to do so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And she was right to do so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835301</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29843637</id>
	<title>Re:The Fucking Crybabies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256290740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dear lord - I'm a woman, in IT, and it being male dominated (seriously, sorry if it hurts your egos, but most IT guys really aren't intimidating) just isn't the reason. A few half naked girls are far more awkward to be around for the guys than me (I see more female flesh than that on display in the gym changing rooms every day)</p><p>Most girls just aren't interested in this kind of job, I'm normally the only female dev, and any other females in the office are in admin and happy with it.</p><p>In taiwan, pretty girls dressed in very little really are culturally acceptable. In my office in Malaysia one of the guys would have phone calls discussing what he was getting up to at the weekend (or had got up to), invited my boyfriend to a 'spa' once, and there were no complaints. My Caucasian boyfriend however had numerous compaints against him, despite being a total sweetheart because they found his face scary (it's a normal face, just very expressive compared to an asian guy)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear lord - I 'm a woman , in IT , and it being male dominated ( seriously , sorry if it hurts your egos , but most IT guys really are n't intimidating ) just is n't the reason .
A few half naked girls are far more awkward to be around for the guys than me ( I see more female flesh than that on display in the gym changing rooms every day ) Most girls just are n't interested in this kind of job , I 'm normally the only female dev , and any other females in the office are in admin and happy with it.In taiwan , pretty girls dressed in very little really are culturally acceptable .
In my office in Malaysia one of the guys would have phone calls discussing what he was getting up to at the weekend ( or had got up to ) , invited my boyfriend to a 'spa ' once , and there were no complaints .
My Caucasian boyfriend however had numerous compaints against him , despite being a total sweetheart because they found his face scary ( it 's a normal face , just very expressive compared to an asian guy )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear lord - I'm a woman, in IT, and it being male dominated (seriously, sorry if it hurts your egos, but most IT guys really aren't intimidating) just isn't the reason.
A few half naked girls are far more awkward to be around for the guys than me (I see more female flesh than that on display in the gym changing rooms every day)Most girls just aren't interested in this kind of job, I'm normally the only female dev, and any other females in the office are in admin and happy with it.In taiwan, pretty girls dressed in very little really are culturally acceptable.
In my office in Malaysia one of the guys would have phone calls discussing what he was getting up to at the weekend (or had got up to), invited my boyfriend to a 'spa' once, and there were no complaints.
My Caucasian boyfriend however had numerous compaints against him, despite being a total sweetheart because they found his face scary (it's a normal face, just very expressive compared to an asian guy)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836085</id>
	<title>Re:The Fucking Crybabies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256230320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>if one developer didn't like it, he could just walk away onto the next room without spoiling the event for everyone else. it is not like they were chained on their chairs. I love when one forces morale upon others... Don't like it? Don't do it. Fine. But don't trample on my freedom of doing it. Unless it's something illegal, and even in the case it is illegal, it's not up to you to stop me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>if one developer did n't like it , he could just walk away onto the next room without spoiling the event for everyone else .
it is not like they were chained on their chairs .
I love when one forces morale upon others... Do n't like it ?
Do n't do it .
Fine. But do n't trample on my freedom of doing it .
Unless it 's something illegal , and even in the case it is illegal , it 's not up to you to stop me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if one developer didn't like it, he could just walk away onto the next room without spoiling the event for everyone else.
it is not like they were chained on their chairs.
I love when one forces morale upon others... Don't like it?
Don't do it.
Fine. But don't trample on my freedom of doing it.
Unless it's something illegal, and even in the case it is illegal, it's not up to you to stop me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835299</id>
	<title>Sign me up for yahoo!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yahoo! if they offered these kind of "customer appreciation" events more often, I'll stop using gmail, switch over to yahoo mail, and also simultaneously stop using MSN, AIM, and GCHAT in favor of Yahoo IM.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yahoo !
if they offered these kind of " customer appreciation " events more often , I 'll stop using gmail , switch over to yahoo mail , and also simultaneously stop using MSN , AIM , and GCHAT in favor of Yahoo IM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yahoo!
if they offered these kind of "customer appreciation" events more often, I'll stop using gmail, switch over to yahoo mail, and also simultaneously stop using MSN, AIM, and GCHAT in favor of Yahoo IM.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835543</id>
	<title>Re:never apologize for sex</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1256228100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wussy  (<b>w</b>imp plus p<b>ussy</b>)  -   And your girl was just using an excuse.   She had already made-up her mind to dump you several days prior.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wussy ( wimp plus pussy ) - And your girl was just using an excuse .
She had already made-up her mind to dump you several days prior .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wussy  (wimp plus pussy)  -   And your girl was just using an excuse.
She had already made-up her mind to dump you several days prior.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835301</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836547</id>
	<title>Ob. Kids in the Hall</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256232480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kevin: I'd like to begin the presentation, but first, THE WHORES!</p><p>Dave: WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON HERE?</p><p>Mark: THIS IS HIGHLY IRREGULAR!</p><p>Bruce: JAY!! This is not how we do business here!</p><p>[...]</p><p>Bruce: We'll have the presentation. *Then* we'll have the whores!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kevin : I 'd like to begin the presentation , but first , THE WHORES ! Dave : WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON HERE ? Mark : THIS IS HIGHLY IRREGULAR ! Bruce : JAY ! !
This is not how we do business here ! [ .. .
] Bruce : We 'll have the presentation .
* Then * we 'll have the whores !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kevin: I'd like to begin the presentation, but first, THE WHORES!Dave: WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON HERE?Mark: THIS IS HIGHLY IRREGULAR!Bruce: JAY!!
This is not how we do business here![...
]Bruce: We'll have the presentation.
*Then* we'll have the whores!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835703</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29842639</id>
	<title>Re:This is an outrage!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256229360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is ridiculous. Every developer the world over, should be applying to Yahoo after seeing these photos. Or perhaps thats the reason for the apology.</p><p>Yeah... on second thought --where's my lap dance!?!?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is ridiculous .
Every developer the world over , should be applying to Yahoo after seeing these photos .
Or perhaps thats the reason for the apology.Yeah... on second thought --where 's my lap dance ! ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is ridiculous.
Every developer the world over, should be applying to Yahoo after seeing these photos.
Or perhaps thats the reason for the apology.Yeah... on second thought --where's my lap dance!?!
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835239</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835239</id>
	<title>This is an outrage!</title>
	<author>PalmHair</author>
	<datestamp>1256226900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why wasn't I invited?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why was n't I invited ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why wasn't I invited?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835703</id>
	<title>It is Taiwan....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256228640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>... There it is considered positively old fashioned and prudish to stop with just lap dances. The competition is sure to be offering a lot more.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... There it is considered positively old fashioned and prudish to stop with just lap dances .
The competition is sure to be offering a lot more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... There it is considered positively old fashioned and prudish to stop with just lap dances.
The competition is sure to be offering a lot more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</id>
	<title>Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>kevjava</author>
	<datestamp>1256229000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in the Information Technology field?  This might go some way to explain it.</p><p>Did Yahoo not think that women engineers would be present at this event?  They make up <a href="http://www.dol.gov/wb/factsheets/hitech02.htm" title="dol.gov" rel="nofollow">roughly ten percent of engineers as a whole</a> [dol.gov].  Furthermore, did they think that there was some way that women attendees would be perfectly comfortable watching other women objectified on a stage?</p><p>It's not that I mind women being objectified for money -- the women involved are handsomely rewarded for their parts in this business deal.  I do mind people in my field saying that they do everything they can to make women comfortable in our field, then turning around and saying that they don't understand why anyone would be offended by this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in the Information Technology field ?
This might go some way to explain it.Did Yahoo not think that women engineers would be present at this event ?
They make up roughly ten percent of engineers as a whole [ dol.gov ] .
Furthermore , did they think that there was some way that women attendees would be perfectly comfortable watching other women objectified on a stage ? It 's not that I mind women being objectified for money -- the women involved are handsomely rewarded for their parts in this business deal .
I do mind people in my field saying that they do everything they can to make women comfortable in our field , then turning around and saying that they do n't understand why anyone would be offended by this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in the Information Technology field?
This might go some way to explain it.Did Yahoo not think that women engineers would be present at this event?
They make up roughly ten percent of engineers as a whole [dol.gov].
Furthermore, did they think that there was some way that women attendees would be perfectly comfortable watching other women objectified on a stage?It's not that I mind women being objectified for money -- the women involved are handsomely rewarded for their parts in this business deal.
I do mind people in my field saying that they do everything they can to make women comfortable in our field, then turning around and saying that they don't understand why anyone would be offended by this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839979</id>
	<title>Re:Kid in the white shirt looks akward</title>
	<author>Tyler Durden</author>
	<datestamp>1256205060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's why God invented Canada.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's why God invented Canada .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's why God invented Canada.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836113</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835249</id>
	<title>Kid in the white shirt looks akward</title>
	<author>Nebulious</author>
	<datestamp>1256226900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just goes to show you that you can read all of the documentation you want, but experience is what really matters.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just goes to show you that you can read all of the documentation you want , but experience is what really matters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just goes to show you that you can read all of the documentation you want, but experience is what really matters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837527</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the problem?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256236500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>all girls are bi dont you know</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>all girls are bi dont you know</tokentext>
<sentencetext>all girls are bi dont you know</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835625</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838457</id>
	<title>Just Lap Dances ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256240280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>What, no mandatory blow jobs after the strippers got all the dicks hard ? What a fucked-up show!</htmltext>
<tokenext>What , no mandatory blow jobs after the strippers got all the dicks hard ?
What a fucked-up show !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, no mandatory blow jobs after the strippers got all the dicks hard ?
What a fucked-up show!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835473</id>
	<title>Yahoo lives up to their name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They aren't called Yahoo! for nothing!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are n't called Yahoo !
for nothing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They aren't called Yahoo!
for nothing!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837367</id>
	<title>Sex is bad, m'kay.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256235900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Getting caught is especially bad, m'kay.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Getting caught is especially bad , m'kay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Getting caught is especially bad, m'kay.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835621</id>
	<title>Re:Oblig. Bloodhound Gang reference</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256228340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WORD!..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WORD ! . .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WORD!..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835337</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838679</id>
	<title>Re:Wonder why women are so uncomfortable...</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1256241540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes.  I know plenty of women who go to strip clubs with their male friends.</p><p>ESPECIALLY in someplace like Taiwan where this is entirely socially acceptable behavior.</p><p>Knowing the culture of the area you live in helps before you start talking about how people there should feel, especially if you're going to project your own culture onto them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
I know plenty of women who go to strip clubs with their male friends.ESPECIALLY in someplace like Taiwan where this is entirely socially acceptable behavior.Knowing the culture of the area you live in helps before you start talking about how people there should feel , especially if you 're going to project your own culture onto them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
I know plenty of women who go to strip clubs with their male friends.ESPECIALLY in someplace like Taiwan where this is entirely socially acceptable behavior.Knowing the culture of the area you live in helps before you start talking about how people there should feel, especially if you're going to project your own culture onto them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835631</id>
	<title>work benefit</title>
	<author>roman\_mir</author>
	<datestamp>1256228400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I seem to always pick the wrong place to work, look at those benefits!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I seem to always pick the wrong place to work , look at those benefits !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I seem to always pick the wrong place to work, look at those benefits!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838605
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29840511
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835499
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29842559
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835703
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837075
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839619
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835209
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836111
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29840401
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839359
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29840161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29840605
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835307
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837239
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29843681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836085
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837131
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29843637
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836597
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836799
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836509
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835307
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837155
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835453
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835239
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29842639
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836199
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836417
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29843977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836417
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839669
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839799
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836743
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835543
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839423
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836123
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838957
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839479
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837469
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836973
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835625
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837527
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837441
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835431
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838105
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835197
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29859875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29840299
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838847
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835307
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836259
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835249
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836079
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835249
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835703
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836547
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836357
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835249
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839979
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835357
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837229
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836849
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835307
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835815
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836955
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29842659
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835621
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835897
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837083
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29840575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836917
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29841563
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835307
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837009
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836527
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835499
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839477
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835625
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836233
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835549
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835691
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838843
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836917
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838479
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836917
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29842609
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836917
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835249
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835307
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835499
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838163
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835703
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836395
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838909
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835221
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838633
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836195
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837745
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1232225_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29842435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836429
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835703
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837075
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836547
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836395
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838843
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836917
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838479
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29842609
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838823
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29841563
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839477
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835625
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836233
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837527
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838909
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836213
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836009
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836171
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839619
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838457
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836979
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835303
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835505
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836051
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835825
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836085
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836199
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839423
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838605
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29840299
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839799
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29840161
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837977
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836195
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29843637
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836945
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838957
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839359
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29842435
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836597
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835453
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835779
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835571
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835301
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836527
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836799
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29842559
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838847
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835549
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835691
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29840605
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835543
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835197
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836679
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29859875
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835353
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835357
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837229
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835295
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835249
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836113
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839979
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838711
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836179
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836079
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835783
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836929
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836973
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839249
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836417
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29843977
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839669
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835863
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836471
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29843681
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29840511
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29840401
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29840575
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837745
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838679
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29842659
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836509
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836357
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836743
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836849
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837441
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836627
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837155
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29839479
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837531
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837131
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836123
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836773
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835897
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838207
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836111
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835255
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835239
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29842639
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836667
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835383
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835209
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837591
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835307
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838289
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835751
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837009
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836259
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837239
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835815
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835431
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838105
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835337
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838051
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835621
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837083
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29837469
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836437
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835221
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838633
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835499
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836581
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29838163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29836747
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835481
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835371
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1232225.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1232225.29835899
</commentlist>
</conversation>
