<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_22_1218232</id>
	<title>Engineers Tell How Feedback Shaped Windows 7</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1256220480000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Ars Technica took the time to talk to three members of the Windows 7 product development and planning team to find out <a href="http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/10/win-7-engineers-how-user-feedback-shaped-the-final-release.ars">how user feedback impacted the latest version of Windows</a>. There's some market speak you'll have to wade through, but overall it gives a solid picture regarding the development of a Windows release."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Ars Technica took the time to talk to three members of the Windows 7 product development and planning team to find out how user feedback impacted the latest version of Windows .
There 's some market speak you 'll have to wade through , but overall it gives a solid picture regarding the development of a Windows release .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Ars Technica took the time to talk to three members of the Windows 7 product development and planning team to find out how user feedback impacted the latest version of Windows.
There's some market speak you'll have to wade through, but overall it gives a solid picture regarding the development of a Windows release.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835953</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256229720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MS CERTIFIED those "Underpowered PCs" as Vista compatible, and Vista was also a tremendous memory and performance pig.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MS CERTIFIED those " Underpowered PCs " as Vista compatible , and Vista was also a tremendous memory and performance pig .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MS CERTIFIED those "Underpowered PCs" as Vista compatible, and Vista was also a tremendous memory and performance pig.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839421</id>
	<title>Re:Install</title>
	<author>rastos1</author>
	<datestamp>1256202060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I'm sure you can change all of those. Dig around in the personalize or appearance dialogues</p></div></blockquote><p>

It is also hidden pretty well<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-). Right click on desktop-&gt;Personalize-&gt;Window Color-&gt;in the combo Item select value Border Padding and change it to 0. That was the short way. You can also go Windows Orb-&gt;Control Panel-&gt;Appearance and Personalization-&gt;Personalization-&gt;Window Color-&gt;Item-&gt;Border Padding. Right there just a few^H^H^H^H too many clicks away.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure you can change all of those .
Dig around in the personalize or appearance dialogues It is also hidden pretty well ; - ) .
Right click on desktop- &gt; Personalize- &gt; Window Color- &gt; in the combo Item select value Border Padding and change it to 0 .
That was the short way .
You can also go Windows Orb- &gt; Control Panel- &gt; Appearance and Personalization- &gt; Personalization- &gt; Window Color- &gt; Item- &gt; Border Padding .
Right there just a few ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H too many clicks away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure you can change all of those.
Dig around in the personalize or appearance dialogues

It is also hidden pretty well ;-).
Right click on desktop-&gt;Personalize-&gt;Window Color-&gt;in the combo Item select value Border Padding and change it to 0.
That was the short way.
You can also go Windows Orb-&gt;Control Panel-&gt;Appearance and Personalization-&gt;Personalization-&gt;Window Color-&gt;Item-&gt;Border Padding.
Right there just a few^H^H^H^H too many clicks away.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837233</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835785</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>vandit2k6</author>
	<datestamp>1256229060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>7 truly is Vista SP3. And I don't say that in a negative fashion; Vista runs very well on my two desktops and laptop.



However, minus the new taskbar (which I think is a massive step forward), there really isn't that much that's new. A little bit faster, a little bit less buggy.



In the end, 7 is Mojave Experiment 2.0. Microsoft tried an ad campaign, it failed because people wouldn't get over how "bad Vista is". Microsoft gives it new clothes and a new name- now it's the best version of Windows EVER!



In short, Microsoft went back to marketing after the Vista launch floundered and destroyed its reputation (due to a bunch of underpowered computers with poorly written drivers giving the OS a bad reputation).</p></div><p>It boggles my mind that people find Vista unstable. At least for me Vista runs a whole lot better than Windows ME ever ran. I think people forget that it can be worse, much worse. That is also not an excuse to write bad software but looking at the history of OS's - Vista is doing pretty dam well - in my opinion. Nothing past ME has been as horrible as ME ever was. This is an improvement - I think.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>7 truly is Vista SP3 .
And I do n't say that in a negative fashion ; Vista runs very well on my two desktops and laptop .
However , minus the new taskbar ( which I think is a massive step forward ) , there really is n't that much that 's new .
A little bit faster , a little bit less buggy .
In the end , 7 is Mojave Experiment 2.0 .
Microsoft tried an ad campaign , it failed because people would n't get over how " bad Vista is " .
Microsoft gives it new clothes and a new name- now it 's the best version of Windows EVER !
In short , Microsoft went back to marketing after the Vista launch floundered and destroyed its reputation ( due to a bunch of underpowered computers with poorly written drivers giving the OS a bad reputation ) .It boggles my mind that people find Vista unstable .
At least for me Vista runs a whole lot better than Windows ME ever ran .
I think people forget that it can be worse , much worse .
That is also not an excuse to write bad software but looking at the history of OS 's - Vista is doing pretty dam well - in my opinion .
Nothing past ME has been as horrible as ME ever was .
This is an improvement - I think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>7 truly is Vista SP3.
And I don't say that in a negative fashion; Vista runs very well on my two desktops and laptop.
However, minus the new taskbar (which I think is a massive step forward), there really isn't that much that's new.
A little bit faster, a little bit less buggy.
In the end, 7 is Mojave Experiment 2.0.
Microsoft tried an ad campaign, it failed because people wouldn't get over how "bad Vista is".
Microsoft gives it new clothes and a new name- now it's the best version of Windows EVER!
In short, Microsoft went back to marketing after the Vista launch floundered and destroyed its reputation (due to a bunch of underpowered computers with poorly written drivers giving the OS a bad reputation).It boggles my mind that people find Vista unstable.
At least for me Vista runs a whole lot better than Windows ME ever ran.
I think people forget that it can be worse, much worse.
That is also not an excuse to write bad software but looking at the history of OS's - Vista is doing pretty dam well - in my opinion.
Nothing past ME has been as horrible as ME ever was.
This is an improvement - I think.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837731</id>
	<title>Re:Dear God...</title>
	<author>ub3r n3u7r4l1st</author>
	<datestamp>1256237220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can get it for free on MSDNAA or Technet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can get it for free on MSDNAA or Technet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can get it for free on MSDNAA or Technet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836739</id>
	<title>Re:An F-15 is much bigger than a P-51. OMG BLOAT!</title>
	<author>0100010001010011</author>
	<datestamp>1256233320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How has Apple seemingly made OS X appear increasingly faster? Granted 10.0 had plenty to improve on, but 10.1-10.2-10.3 on my 866 mHz machine seemed to get faster.</p><p>10.4 - 10.5 - 10.6 on my MacBook Pro seemed to fly.</p><p>(Heck 10.6 increased HD space because it dropped all the legacy PPC code).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How has Apple seemingly made OS X appear increasingly faster ?
Granted 10.0 had plenty to improve on , but 10.1-10.2-10.3 on my 866 mHz machine seemed to get faster.10.4 - 10.5 - 10.6 on my MacBook Pro seemed to fly .
( Heck 10.6 increased HD space because it dropped all the legacy PPC code ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How has Apple seemingly made OS X appear increasingly faster?
Granted 10.0 had plenty to improve on, but 10.1-10.2-10.3 on my 866 mHz machine seemed to get faster.10.4 - 10.5 - 10.6 on my MacBook Pro seemed to fly.
(Heck 10.6 increased HD space because it dropped all the legacy PPC code).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834775</id>
	<title>Yes</title>
	<author>homey of my owney</author>
	<datestamp>1256224380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ummm.... We'd like it not to crash.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ummm.... We 'd like it not to crash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ummm.... We'd like it not to crash.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838057</id>
	<title>Re:Dear God...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256238480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I yet have to find someone who can show me what it brings me, over XP, that is worth paying 100+ EUR for."</p><p>Well, I haven't used it, but based on the NYT review I saw this morning...<br>1.  shiny pretty graphics that pop up previews of programs on the task bar<br>2.  DRM (requires activation; same driver signing issues as Vista)<br>3.  More DRM (media player talks to other hardware...only if it supports the same DRM)<br>4.  Confusion over which version has what feature</p><p>I guess I'm not planning to "upgrade" anytime soon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I yet have to find someone who can show me what it brings me , over XP , that is worth paying 100 + EUR for .
" Well , I have n't used it , but based on the NYT review I saw this morning...1. shiny pretty graphics that pop up previews of programs on the task bar2 .
DRM ( requires activation ; same driver signing issues as Vista ) 3 .
More DRM ( media player talks to other hardware...only if it supports the same DRM ) 4 .
Confusion over which version has what featureI guess I 'm not planning to " upgrade " anytime soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I yet have to find someone who can show me what it brings me, over XP, that is worth paying 100+ EUR for.
"Well, I haven't used it, but based on the NYT review I saw this morning...1.  shiny pretty graphics that pop up previews of programs on the task bar2.
DRM (requires activation; same driver signing issues as Vista)3.
More DRM (media player talks to other hardware...only if it supports the same DRM)4.
Confusion over which version has what featureI guess I'm not planning to "upgrade" anytime soon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840971</id>
	<title>Re:Window's Explorer...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256210880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bring back winfile.</p><p>It was better than explorer....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bring back winfile.It was better than explorer... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bring back winfile.It was better than explorer....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835321</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29928381</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>ismism</author>
	<datestamp>1256894520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One word: Ubuntu</htmltext>
<tokenext>One word : Ubuntu</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One word: Ubuntu</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835827</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256229240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OMG! That's the funniest thing I've read in a looong time!</p><p>Thanks, I need that !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OMG !
That 's the funniest thing I 've read in a looong time ! Thanks , I need that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OMG!
That's the funniest thing I've read in a looong time!Thanks, I need that !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29841543</id>
	<title>Re:Window's Explorer...</title>
	<author>complete loony</author>
	<datestamp>1256214840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have you tried one of <a href="http://www.simplehelp.net/2006/10/11/10-windows-explorer-alternatives-compared-and-reviewed/" title="simplehelp.net">these</a> [simplehelp.net]?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you tried one of these [ simplehelp.net ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you tried one of these [simplehelp.net]?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835321</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835563</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1256228160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>7 truly is Vista SP3.</p></div><p>The line is always fuzzy and subjective. Was XP a "service pack for 2000"? Is the difference between pre-SP XP and 2000 really that much bigger than that between 7 and Vista?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>7 truly is Vista SP3.The line is always fuzzy and subjective .
Was XP a " service pack for 2000 " ?
Is the difference between pre-SP XP and 2000 really that much bigger than that between 7 and Vista ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>7 truly is Vista SP3.The line is always fuzzy and subjective.
Was XP a "service pack for 2000"?
Is the difference between pre-SP XP and 2000 really that much bigger than that between 7 and Vista?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838981</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>mvdwege</author>
	<datestamp>1256243040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All out system crashes may have become rare, but niggling little subsystem crashes that can really make your day on a Windows platform hell still persist. One I personally meet every day, at least twice, is the <tt>rdpclip</tt> process mysteriously not passing clipboard data out of or into a Terminal Server session anymore.</p><p>To say nothing of profile corruption, which still occurs, despite the promise at the release of XP that it would be a thing of the past. And how a corrupt profile can disable acceleration on my video card still baffles me.</p><p>Some Windows users take an enormous amount of shit in stride, yet scream bloody murder at every minor issue in a Linux distribution. It puzzles me.</p><p>
Mart</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All out system crashes may have become rare , but niggling little subsystem crashes that can really make your day on a Windows platform hell still persist .
One I personally meet every day , at least twice , is the rdpclip process mysteriously not passing clipboard data out of or into a Terminal Server session anymore.To say nothing of profile corruption , which still occurs , despite the promise at the release of XP that it would be a thing of the past .
And how a corrupt profile can disable acceleration on my video card still baffles me.Some Windows users take an enormous amount of shit in stride , yet scream bloody murder at every minor issue in a Linux distribution .
It puzzles me .
Mart</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All out system crashes may have become rare, but niggling little subsystem crashes that can really make your day on a Windows platform hell still persist.
One I personally meet every day, at least twice, is the rdpclip process mysteriously not passing clipboard data out of or into a Terminal Server session anymore.To say nothing of profile corruption, which still occurs, despite the promise at the release of XP that it would be a thing of the past.
And how a corrupt profile can disable acceleration on my video card still baffles me.Some Windows users take an enormous amount of shit in stride, yet scream bloody murder at every minor issue in a Linux distribution.
It puzzles me.
Mart</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835137</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836451</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>sam0737</author>
	<datestamp>1256232120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SP3? may be. But a big SP! BTW, I think MS always want the Vista to be as good as Win 7 but wasn't be able to achieve that.</p><p>It's much easier to connect to a new wireless with the new network manager pane. Ubuntu (Gnome?) might have a similar pane, but 7 doesn't need to ask me if it's a WEP/WPA/WPA2/Whatever...<br>Creating Ad-hoc network aren't difficult. Much easier than XP.</p><p>Driver installation is superb. I am using a Thinkpad T61p laptop, all drivers are ready after turning on Windows update. Plugging a new device, say Logitech Webcam which traditionally causes a lot of trouble for me, also works seamlessly today on 7. The driver installed also comes with no crap, unlike the CD that comes with the cam.</p><p>did I mention I am using a Win 7 x64? Finally I got the last 0.9GB RAM claimed (in 32 bit only 3.1G were usable), and I have encountered no issue so far, no driver nor app issue, or whatever, although YMMV.</p><p>The concept of Library please me. Now I can have one more set of "My Documents", and selectively sync only one set with my office desktop (sync is done through other mechanism though)</p><p>Start menu and Task bar now has "the most recent accessed document" integrated. Say if you use Notepad frequent enough to get onto the start menu list, it offers you a list to access the most recently opened document. For Firefox/IE, it offers most recently/frequently used website. It goes for windows media player, Office Apps and even GVIM!</p><p>A nice way to organize and hide a large number of task icon, an important feature as there are more and more programs tends to abuse that space.</p><p>The action center / troubleshooting actually does solve problem, nice and easy way. I once had a problem with my LAN connection, may be a DHCP refresh or NIC reset will do, but I gave a try to the Action center, it just does all that with one click and verify the result. It also has some more commonly used troubleshooting template (like troubleshoot Sound Recording) which does similar thing, a big plus for WAF IMHO.</p><p>The power management now includes a timer for dimming the display, before turning it to a black screen. Very useful for laptop user.</p><p>I didn't even start mention the area that Vista does way better than XP in many many areas (Network, Printers, Start Menu,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...).</p><p>Once again MS raise the bar of Desktop computing somewhat. OTOH, I am running a Linux server at home for LAMP/Asterisk/ipfilter/MythTV, it's great for because I could customization it in the way I want, but would I use it as a desktop? Sorry no.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SP3 ?
may be .
But a big SP !
BTW , I think MS always want the Vista to be as good as Win 7 but was n't be able to achieve that.It 's much easier to connect to a new wireless with the new network manager pane .
Ubuntu ( Gnome ?
) might have a similar pane , but 7 does n't need to ask me if it 's a WEP/WPA/WPA2/Whatever...Creating Ad-hoc network are n't difficult .
Much easier than XP.Driver installation is superb .
I am using a Thinkpad T61p laptop , all drivers are ready after turning on Windows update .
Plugging a new device , say Logitech Webcam which traditionally causes a lot of trouble for me , also works seamlessly today on 7 .
The driver installed also comes with no crap , unlike the CD that comes with the cam.did I mention I am using a Win 7 x64 ?
Finally I got the last 0.9GB RAM claimed ( in 32 bit only 3.1G were usable ) , and I have encountered no issue so far , no driver nor app issue , or whatever , although YMMV.The concept of Library please me .
Now I can have one more set of " My Documents " , and selectively sync only one set with my office desktop ( sync is done through other mechanism though ) Start menu and Task bar now has " the most recent accessed document " integrated .
Say if you use Notepad frequent enough to get onto the start menu list , it offers you a list to access the most recently opened document .
For Firefox/IE , it offers most recently/frequently used website .
It goes for windows media player , Office Apps and even GVIM ! A nice way to organize and hide a large number of task icon , an important feature as there are more and more programs tends to abuse that space.The action center / troubleshooting actually does solve problem , nice and easy way .
I once had a problem with my LAN connection , may be a DHCP refresh or NIC reset will do , but I gave a try to the Action center , it just does all that with one click and verify the result .
It also has some more commonly used troubleshooting template ( like troubleshoot Sound Recording ) which does similar thing , a big plus for WAF IMHO.The power management now includes a timer for dimming the display , before turning it to a black screen .
Very useful for laptop user.I did n't even start mention the area that Vista does way better than XP in many many areas ( Network , Printers , Start Menu , ... ) .Once again MS raise the bar of Desktop computing somewhat .
OTOH , I am running a Linux server at home for LAMP/Asterisk/ipfilter/MythTV , it 's great for because I could customization it in the way I want , but would I use it as a desktop ?
Sorry no .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SP3?
may be.
But a big SP!
BTW, I think MS always want the Vista to be as good as Win 7 but wasn't be able to achieve that.It's much easier to connect to a new wireless with the new network manager pane.
Ubuntu (Gnome?
) might have a similar pane, but 7 doesn't need to ask me if it's a WEP/WPA/WPA2/Whatever...Creating Ad-hoc network aren't difficult.
Much easier than XP.Driver installation is superb.
I am using a Thinkpad T61p laptop, all drivers are ready after turning on Windows update.
Plugging a new device, say Logitech Webcam which traditionally causes a lot of trouble for me, also works seamlessly today on 7.
The driver installed also comes with no crap, unlike the CD that comes with the cam.did I mention I am using a Win 7 x64?
Finally I got the last 0.9GB RAM claimed (in 32 bit only 3.1G were usable), and I have encountered no issue so far, no driver nor app issue, or whatever, although YMMV.The concept of Library please me.
Now I can have one more set of "My Documents", and selectively sync only one set with my office desktop (sync is done through other mechanism though)Start menu and Task bar now has "the most recent accessed document" integrated.
Say if you use Notepad frequent enough to get onto the start menu list, it offers you a list to access the most recently opened document.
For Firefox/IE, it offers most recently/frequently used website.
It goes for windows media player, Office Apps and even GVIM!A nice way to organize and hide a large number of task icon, an important feature as there are more and more programs tends to abuse that space.The action center / troubleshooting actually does solve problem, nice and easy way.
I once had a problem with my LAN connection, may be a DHCP refresh or NIC reset will do, but I gave a try to the Action center, it just does all that with one click and verify the result.
It also has some more commonly used troubleshooting template (like troubleshoot Sound Recording) which does similar thing, a big plus for WAF IMHO.The power management now includes a timer for dimming the display, before turning it to a black screen.
Very useful for laptop user.I didn't even start mention the area that Vista does way better than XP in many many areas (Network, Printers, Start Menu, ...).Once again MS raise the bar of Desktop computing somewhat.
OTOH, I am running a Linux server at home for LAMP/Asterisk/ipfilter/MythTV, it's great for because I could customization it in the way I want, but would I use it as a desktop?
Sorry no.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835607</id>
	<title>Re:Dear God...</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1256228280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Honestly as a home user you get ipv6 (which you may not really benefit from if you're behind an ipv4 router), self-healing NTFS, DirectX 11, a new taskbar (which is admittedly pretty neat) and not a whole lot more.</p><p>You get continued security updates for a longer period of time.</p><p>Is it worth paying to upgrade?</p><p>Probably not. I bought a copy for DirectX 11 because the only reason I keep Windows around for is gaming. I also got the upgrade when it was $50 (USD) so it was a much easier pill to swallow. Your mileage may vary.</p><p>As a footnote, many people don't realize you can't really upgrade from XP either. Your upgrade is wiping your computer, and installing everything from scratch. I consider this a terrible mistake on Microsoft's part, to constantly shut down upgrade paths. It is almost like they don't want their customers to spend money to upgrade. They do their best to dissuade them. We're looking at a scenario here where we won't be able to upgrade to the latest Exchange 2010 because we're on 2003, and there is no direct upgrade path. And we're not wiping out entire Exchange server and starting anew.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Honestly as a home user you get ipv6 ( which you may not really benefit from if you 're behind an ipv4 router ) , self-healing NTFS , DirectX 11 , a new taskbar ( which is admittedly pretty neat ) and not a whole lot more.You get continued security updates for a longer period of time.Is it worth paying to upgrade ? Probably not .
I bought a copy for DirectX 11 because the only reason I keep Windows around for is gaming .
I also got the upgrade when it was $ 50 ( USD ) so it was a much easier pill to swallow .
Your mileage may vary.As a footnote , many people do n't realize you ca n't really upgrade from XP either .
Your upgrade is wiping your computer , and installing everything from scratch .
I consider this a terrible mistake on Microsoft 's part , to constantly shut down upgrade paths .
It is almost like they do n't want their customers to spend money to upgrade .
They do their best to dissuade them .
We 're looking at a scenario here where we wo n't be able to upgrade to the latest Exchange 2010 because we 're on 2003 , and there is no direct upgrade path .
And we 're not wiping out entire Exchange server and starting anew .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Honestly as a home user you get ipv6 (which you may not really benefit from if you're behind an ipv4 router), self-healing NTFS, DirectX 11, a new taskbar (which is admittedly pretty neat) and not a whole lot more.You get continued security updates for a longer period of time.Is it worth paying to upgrade?Probably not.
I bought a copy for DirectX 11 because the only reason I keep Windows around for is gaming.
I also got the upgrade when it was $50 (USD) so it was a much easier pill to swallow.
Your mileage may vary.As a footnote, many people don't realize you can't really upgrade from XP either.
Your upgrade is wiping your computer, and installing everything from scratch.
I consider this a terrible mistake on Microsoft's part, to constantly shut down upgrade paths.
It is almost like they don't want their customers to spend money to upgrade.
They do their best to dissuade them.
We're looking at a scenario here where we won't be able to upgrade to the latest Exchange 2010 because we're on 2003, and there is no direct upgrade path.
And we're not wiping out entire Exchange server and starting anew.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835573</id>
	<title>Re:Dear God...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256228160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course there's nothing in Win7 worth spending 100+ EUR for over XP.</p><p>Fucking DUH.</p><p>That doesn't mean though that Windows 7 isn't a well designed OS, signifigantly better than Vista (despite the Vista similarity).</p><p>I won't replace my corporate MS licenses with Win7 either...waste of money...but I'm not going to avoid ordering new PC's with Windows 7 on them either, which I did with Vista.</p><p>Honestly, even with the debacle that was WinME, I still wouldn't advise spending money to upgrade your OS.  Free or near free (Linux, OSX), fine, upgrade to your hearts content...but who cares about the OS as long as it bloody works?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course there 's nothing in Win7 worth spending 100 + EUR for over XP.Fucking DUH.That does n't mean though that Windows 7 is n't a well designed OS , signifigantly better than Vista ( despite the Vista similarity ) .I wo n't replace my corporate MS licenses with Win7 either...waste of money...but I 'm not going to avoid ordering new PC 's with Windows 7 on them either , which I did with Vista.Honestly , even with the debacle that was WinME , I still would n't advise spending money to upgrade your OS .
Free or near free ( Linux , OSX ) , fine , upgrade to your hearts content...but who cares about the OS as long as it bloody works ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course there's nothing in Win7 worth spending 100+ EUR for over XP.Fucking DUH.That doesn't mean though that Windows 7 isn't a well designed OS, signifigantly better than Vista (despite the Vista similarity).I won't replace my corporate MS licenses with Win7 either...waste of money...but I'm not going to avoid ordering new PC's with Windows 7 on them either, which I did with Vista.Honestly, even with the debacle that was WinME, I still wouldn't advise spending money to upgrade your OS.
Free or near free (Linux, OSX), fine, upgrade to your hearts content...but who cares about the OS as long as it bloody works?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838303</id>
	<title>Re:Install</title>
	<author>spectro</author>
	<datestamp>1256239500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>This is always a problem with brand new OSs, and drivers are always a pain in the ass. Installing a Creative X-Fi driver required around 5 reboots, and sever jaunts to the internet to get the full features. Driver devs haven't quite jumped on the bandwagon of x64, much less Windows 7.</i>
<p>That is one of the things that pisses me the most about Windows, it takes several hrs to install everything you need on it. I just saw my brother taking a whole afternoon reinstalling XP to a laptop... and this is with the damn recovery CD.
</p><p>With Ubuntu on the other hand I pop the CD, answer 4 questions and 10 mins later the system is up and ready to go, no need to hunt for drivers or toolbar crap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is always a problem with brand new OSs , and drivers are always a pain in the ass .
Installing a Creative X-Fi driver required around 5 reboots , and sever jaunts to the internet to get the full features .
Driver devs have n't quite jumped on the bandwagon of x64 , much less Windows 7 .
That is one of the things that pisses me the most about Windows , it takes several hrs to install everything you need on it .
I just saw my brother taking a whole afternoon reinstalling XP to a laptop... and this is with the damn recovery CD .
With Ubuntu on the other hand I pop the CD , answer 4 questions and 10 mins later the system is up and ready to go , no need to hunt for drivers or toolbar crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is always a problem with brand new OSs, and drivers are always a pain in the ass.
Installing a Creative X-Fi driver required around 5 reboots, and sever jaunts to the internet to get the full features.
Driver devs haven't quite jumped on the bandwagon of x64, much less Windows 7.
That is one of the things that pisses me the most about Windows, it takes several hrs to install everything you need on it.
I just saw my brother taking a whole afternoon reinstalling XP to a laptop... and this is with the damn recovery CD.
With Ubuntu on the other hand I pop the CD, answer 4 questions and 10 mins later the system is up and ready to go, no need to hunt for drivers or toolbar crap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837233</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835847</id>
	<title>Is there anything GOOD in windows 7....</title>
	<author>sys\_mast</author>
	<datestamp>1256229360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...that came from this feedback, that makes businesses using XP want to switch? We all know why NOBODY switched to Vista, so why would anyone switch to win7?</p><p>Please, I'm not asking why should NOT switch, we all know that answer. But someone please explain why we SHOULD move to win7 !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...that came from this feedback , that makes businesses using XP want to switch ?
We all know why NOBODY switched to Vista , so why would anyone switch to win7 ? Please , I 'm not asking why should NOT switch , we all know that answer .
But someone please explain why we SHOULD move to win7 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that came from this feedback, that makes businesses using XP want to switch?
We all know why NOBODY switched to Vista, so why would anyone switch to win7?Please, I'm not asking why should NOT switch, we all know that answer.
But someone please explain why we SHOULD move to win7 !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29841313</id>
	<title>Matt</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256213280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This article is complete crap. I want to make an article about how something is like an ex girlfriend...but what could I use as the subject...OH OOH OOH WINDOWS 7!!! Yeh that would be soooo AWESUM!</p><p>Spare the internet please. Just stupid, really really stupid and pointless, you are on the douche bandwagon "Not liking Windows makes me cool"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This article is complete crap .
I want to make an article about how something is like an ex girlfriend...but what could I use as the subject...OH OOH OOH WINDOWS 7 ! ! !
Yeh that would be soooo AWESUM ! Spare the internet please .
Just stupid , really really stupid and pointless , you are on the douche bandwagon " Not liking Windows makes me cool "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This article is complete crap.
I want to make an article about how something is like an ex girlfriend...but what could I use as the subject...OH OOH OOH WINDOWS 7!!!
Yeh that would be soooo AWESUM!Spare the internet please.
Just stupid, really really stupid and pointless, you are on the douche bandwagon "Not liking Windows makes me cool"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840037</id>
	<title>What about Mac?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256205360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Meanwhile, your bi-curious MACrOSeXual friend who thought he was making progress into your pants is pissed that he has to start wearing you down all over again... and your pet Penguin, who is just there to cry with, is just sick of the drama.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Meanwhile , your bi-curious MACrOSeXual friend who thought he was making progress into your pants is pissed that he has to start wearing you down all over again... and your pet Penguin , who is just there to cry with , is just sick of the drama .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meanwhile, your bi-curious MACrOSeXual friend who thought he was making progress into your pants is pissed that he has to start wearing you down all over again... and your pet Penguin, who is just there to cry with, is just sick of the drama.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835071</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256226000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Would you consider a laptop with a core 2 duo 1.8ghz<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.</p></div><p>The laptop I bought 4 years ago at least had a 2ghz duo (which seems fairly robust to me... but</p><p><div class="quote"><p>with 1GB of ram underpowered?</p><p>Because Vista is unusable on that hardware.</p></div><p>RAM starved to say the least.  The last time I had 1 GB RAM was in college (I graduated in 2002).  My preference is to always max out the board the first time, therefore saving money on micro-updates later.  I really do believe it is the most effective thing you can do to speed up a machine.  Sure, XP (and of course Linux) can run on 512 MB, Vista was a new hog in itself.  With enough RAM, your processor would have been good enough.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would you consider a laptop with a core 2 duo 1.8ghz .The laptop I bought 4 years ago at least had a 2ghz duo ( which seems fairly robust to me... butwith 1GB of ram underpowered ? Because Vista is unusable on that hardware.RAM starved to say the least .
The last time I had 1 GB RAM was in college ( I graduated in 2002 ) .
My preference is to always max out the board the first time , therefore saving money on micro-updates later .
I really do believe it is the most effective thing you can do to speed up a machine .
Sure , XP ( and of course Linux ) can run on 512 MB , Vista was a new hog in itself .
With enough RAM , your processor would have been good enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would you consider a laptop with a core 2 duo 1.8ghz .The laptop I bought 4 years ago at least had a 2ghz duo (which seems fairly robust to me... butwith 1GB of ram underpowered?Because Vista is unusable on that hardware.RAM starved to say the least.
The last time I had 1 GB RAM was in college (I graduated in 2002).
My preference is to always max out the board the first time, therefore saving money on micro-updates later.
I really do believe it is the most effective thing you can do to speed up a machine.
Sure, XP (and of course Linux) can run on 512 MB, Vista was a new hog in itself.
With enough RAM, your processor would have been good enough.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835355</id>
	<title>Re:Feedback</title>
	<author>0100010001010011</author>
	<datestamp>1256227320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please say they at least hit the Balmer Peak after the party.</p><p><a href="http://xkcd.com/323/" title="xkcd.com">http://xkcd.com/323/</a> [xkcd.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please say they at least hit the Balmer Peak after the party.http : //xkcd.com/323/ [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please say they at least hit the Balmer Peak after the party.http://xkcd.com/323/ [xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834809</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835177</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>oh\_my\_080980980</author>
	<datestamp>1256226540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, yeah.
<br> <br>
Win 2000  = NT 5.0
<br>
Win XP    = NT 5.1
<br>
Win Vista = NT 6.0
<br>
Win 7     = NT 6.1
<br> <br>
What did people expect.  It's not a new iteration, it's an enhancement. Just because they brand it as a new OS does not make it so.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , yeah .
Win 2000 = NT 5.0 Win XP = NT 5.1 Win Vista = NT 6.0 Win 7 = NT 6.1 What did people expect .
It 's not a new iteration , it 's an enhancement .
Just because they brand it as a new OS does not make it so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, yeah.
Win 2000  = NT 5.0

Win XP    = NT 5.1

Win Vista = NT 6.0

Win 7     = NT 6.1
 
What did people expect.
It's not a new iteration, it's an enhancement.
Just because they brand it as a new OS does not make it so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29847657</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256320740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's more like seeing your current girlfriend's younger sister show up on your doorstep... and come on, we all want some of that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's more like seeing your current girlfriend 's younger sister show up on your doorstep... and come on , we all want some of that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's more like seeing your current girlfriend's younger sister show up on your doorstep... and come on, we all want some of that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835095</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256226120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>microsoft not understanding what Customers want to do with an OS is not the Customers fault.  If there were minimum specs to run it then the OS should just refuse to install if the hardware does not meet them.  Vista got a bad reputation, because it was bad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>microsoft not understanding what Customers want to do with an OS is not the Customers fault .
If there were minimum specs to run it then the OS should just refuse to install if the hardware does not meet them .
Vista got a bad reputation , because it was bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>microsoft not understanding what Customers want to do with an OS is not the Customers fault.
If there were minimum specs to run it then the OS should just refuse to install if the hardware does not meet them.
Vista got a bad reputation, because it was bad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836685</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7 audience...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256233080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is Windows 7 and Office 2007 suppose to be so simple a seven-year-old can use it, or so simple that only a seven-year-old can use it.</p></div><p>I started using Windows 3.1 when I was 8 years old. Before that I knew enough DOS to make some of the early games run. I didn't know English yet, but could make it run by trial-and-error.<br>Don't spend time thinking about what advertisements mean. They're meant to make you think about them so if you do, you've already lost.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is Windows 7 and Office 2007 suppose to be so simple a seven-year-old can use it , or so simple that only a seven-year-old can use it.I started using Windows 3.1 when I was 8 years old .
Before that I knew enough DOS to make some of the early games run .
I did n't know English yet , but could make it run by trial-and-error.Do n't spend time thinking about what advertisements mean .
They 're meant to make you think about them so if you do , you 've already lost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is Windows 7 and Office 2007 suppose to be so simple a seven-year-old can use it, or so simple that only a seven-year-old can use it.I started using Windows 3.1 when I was 8 years old.
Before that I knew enough DOS to make some of the early games run.
I didn't know English yet, but could make it run by trial-and-error.Don't spend time thinking about what advertisements mean.
They're meant to make you think about them so if you do, you've already lost.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838953</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256242860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will she let me stick it in her pooper?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will she let me stick it in her pooper ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will she let me stick it in her pooper?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839243</id>
	<title>Re:Lack of feedback</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1256244360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It should also be noted that bug isn't a simple bug to fix. It involves rewriting major core aspects of OOo. It should also be noted that they are working on rewriting those parts. They are working to address the issue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It should also be noted that bug is n't a simple bug to fix .
It involves rewriting major core aspects of OOo .
It should also be noted that they are working on rewriting those parts .
They are working to address the issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It should also be noted that bug isn't a simple bug to fix.
It involves rewriting major core aspects of OOo.
It should also be noted that they are working on rewriting those parts.
They are working to address the issue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836717</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>acohen1</author>
	<datestamp>1256233200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually XP crashed quite a bit before SP1.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually XP crashed quite a bit before SP1 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually XP crashed quite a bit before SP1.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835137</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869</id>
	<title>Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256224980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>7 truly is Vista SP3. And I don't say that in a negative fashion; Vista runs very well on my two desktops and laptop.
<br> <br>
However, minus the new taskbar (which I think is a massive step forward), there really isn't that much that's new. A little bit faster, a little bit less buggy.
<br> <br>
In the end, 7 is Mojave Experiment 2.0. Microsoft tried an ad campaign, it failed because people wouldn't get over how "bad Vista is". Microsoft gives it new clothes and a new name- now it's the best version of Windows EVER!
<br> <br>
In short, Microsoft went back to marketing after the Vista launch floundered and destroyed its reputation (due to a bunch of underpowered computers with poorly written drivers giving the OS a bad reputation).</htmltext>
<tokenext>7 truly is Vista SP3 .
And I do n't say that in a negative fashion ; Vista runs very well on my two desktops and laptop .
However , minus the new taskbar ( which I think is a massive step forward ) , there really is n't that much that 's new .
A little bit faster , a little bit less buggy .
In the end , 7 is Mojave Experiment 2.0 .
Microsoft tried an ad campaign , it failed because people would n't get over how " bad Vista is " .
Microsoft gives it new clothes and a new name- now it 's the best version of Windows EVER !
In short , Microsoft went back to marketing after the Vista launch floundered and destroyed its reputation ( due to a bunch of underpowered computers with poorly written drivers giving the OS a bad reputation ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>7 truly is Vista SP3.
And I don't say that in a negative fashion; Vista runs very well on my two desktops and laptop.
However, minus the new taskbar (which I think is a massive step forward), there really isn't that much that's new.
A little bit faster, a little bit less buggy.
In the end, 7 is Mojave Experiment 2.0.
Microsoft tried an ad campaign, it failed because people wouldn't get over how "bad Vista is".
Microsoft gives it new clothes and a new name- now it's the best version of Windows EVER!
In short, Microsoft went back to marketing after the Vista launch floundered and destroyed its reputation (due to a bunch of underpowered computers with poorly written drivers giving the OS a bad reputation).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838885</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing to see here</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1256242500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not even a "sup, dawg" joke?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not even a " sup , dawg " joke ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not even a "sup, dawg" joke?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837069</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>Ash-Fox</author>
	<datestamp>1256234520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It boggles my mind that people find Vista unstable.</p></div></blockquote><p>My biggest problem with Vista is that it's scheduler is piss poor. Run a few intensive things like Second life, three virtual machines in vmware and media player and the thing just struggles like hell. This problem did not occur on previous versions of Windows on the same hardware.</p><p>With regards to stability, it seems pretty stable just not very usable. Especially when you have only Winamp running, the screensaver activates and it some how can't handle doing smooth playback and does a lot of jittering for the moment a very basic screensaver activates.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It boggles my mind that people find Vista unstable.My biggest problem with Vista is that it 's scheduler is piss poor .
Run a few intensive things like Second life , three virtual machines in vmware and media player and the thing just struggles like hell .
This problem did not occur on previous versions of Windows on the same hardware.With regards to stability , it seems pretty stable just not very usable .
Especially when you have only Winamp running , the screensaver activates and it some how ca n't handle doing smooth playback and does a lot of jittering for the moment a very basic screensaver activates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It boggles my mind that people find Vista unstable.My biggest problem with Vista is that it's scheduler is piss poor.
Run a few intensive things like Second life, three virtual machines in vmware and media player and the thing just struggles like hell.
This problem did not occur on previous versions of Windows on the same hardware.With regards to stability, it seems pretty stable just not very usable.
Especially when you have only Winamp running, the screensaver activates and it some how can't handle doing smooth playback and does a lot of jittering for the moment a very basic screensaver activates.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837573</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>JoeSchmoe007</author>
	<datestamp>1256236680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>CPU is not a problem. Memory is. As others mentioned, get at least 2GB (total). Also people tend to forget about hard drives. 7200rpm make a noticeable difference comparing to 5400 (I think there was also 4200rpm laptop drives, but not sure. Very often default hard drive on laptops is 5400rpm)</htmltext>
<tokenext>CPU is not a problem .
Memory is .
As others mentioned , get at least 2GB ( total ) .
Also people tend to forget about hard drives .
7200rpm make a noticeable difference comparing to 5400 ( I think there was also 4200rpm laptop drives , but not sure .
Very often default hard drive on laptops is 5400rpm )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CPU is not a problem.
Memory is.
As others mentioned, get at least 2GB (total).
Also people tend to forget about hard drives.
7200rpm make a noticeable difference comparing to 5400 (I think there was also 4200rpm laptop drives, but not sure.
Very often default hard drive on laptops is 5400rpm)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839641</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>space\_jake</author>
	<datestamp>1256203200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can you translate this into a car analogy for me?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you translate this into a car analogy for me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you translate this into a car analogy for me?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835727</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256228760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did you use Vista?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you use Vista ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you use Vista?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835137</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837539</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256236560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Man that is depressing. Very very well written, but depressing... feels a bit like reading Aaron Cometbus</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Man that is depressing .
Very very well written , but depressing... feels a bit like reading Aaron Cometbus</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man that is depressing.
Very very well written, but depressing... feels a bit like reading Aaron Cometbus</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835713</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>ZinnHelden</author>
	<datestamp>1256228640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You'd almost forget about carrying around her legacy baggage or those nights when, for seemingly no reason at all, she would simply stop speaking to you and when you asked what was wrong she'd just spit a string of hex code at you and expect you to figure it out.</p></div><p>Seems like a lot of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.'ers would find women easier to comprehend if this were the case.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'd almost forget about carrying around her legacy baggage or those nights when , for seemingly no reason at all , she would simply stop speaking to you and when you asked what was wrong she 'd just spit a string of hex code at you and expect you to figure it out.Seems like a lot of / .
'ers would find women easier to comprehend if this were the case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'd almost forget about carrying around her legacy baggage or those nights when, for seemingly no reason at all, she would simply stop speaking to you and when you asked what was wrong she'd just spit a string of hex code at you and expect you to figure it out.Seems like a lot of /.
'ers would find women easier to comprehend if this were the case.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835215</id>
	<title>you're being silly</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1256226780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>computers continue to grow in features for the same price. it makes absolutely no sense for microsoft to care one bit about how fast the latest operating system runs on old hardware. all microsoft has to deliver with windows 7 on new hardware is the same performance as xp on old hardware</p><p>sure, it could just mean more eyecandy and more background process bloat, but so what? as long as it is responsive enough, that's all the end user cares about. yes, there are a few obsessed fetishizing extreme users who care that the start menu loads in 130 ms rather than 13 ms, but i hardly think such people matter in microsoft's decision making process, nor should they</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>computers continue to grow in features for the same price .
it makes absolutely no sense for microsoft to care one bit about how fast the latest operating system runs on old hardware .
all microsoft has to deliver with windows 7 on new hardware is the same performance as xp on old hardwaresure , it could just mean more eyecandy and more background process bloat , but so what ?
as long as it is responsive enough , that 's all the end user cares about .
yes , there are a few obsessed fetishizing extreme users who care that the start menu loads in 130 ms rather than 13 ms , but i hardly think such people matter in microsoft 's decision making process , nor should they</tokentext>
<sentencetext>computers continue to grow in features for the same price.
it makes absolutely no sense for microsoft to care one bit about how fast the latest operating system runs on old hardware.
all microsoft has to deliver with windows 7 on new hardware is the same performance as xp on old hardwaresure, it could just mean more eyecandy and more background process bloat, but so what?
as long as it is responsive enough, that's all the end user cares about.
yes, there are a few obsessed fetishizing extreme users who care that the start menu loads in 130 ms rather than 13 ms, but i hardly think such people matter in microsoft's decision making process, nor should they</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840225</id>
	<title>Re:Let's give the devil his due</title>
	<author>podperson</author>
	<datestamp>1256206500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've rebooted XP64 about four times in the last week<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... all security patches.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've rebooted XP64 about four times in the last week ... all security patches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've rebooted XP64 about four times in the last week ... all security patches.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836343</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29847907</id>
	<title>Re:Dear God...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256321640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/presskits/windows7/default.aspx</p><p>click the "Windows 7 Launch Event On-Demand Keynote" and fast forward to about 32:00.  Watch for as long as it takes you to answer your own question.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.microsoft.com/presspass/presskits/windows7/default.aspxclick the " Windows 7 Launch Event On-Demand Keynote " and fast forward to about 32 : 00 .
Watch for as long as it takes you to answer your own question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/presskits/windows7/default.aspxclick the "Windows 7 Launch Event On-Demand Keynote" and fast forward to about 32:00.
Watch for as long as it takes you to answer your own question.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835781</id>
	<title>I wonder if they got my vista sugestion</title>
	<author>Atrox666</author>
	<datestamp>1256229000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if the vista engineers got my suggestion and stabbed themselve in the face.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if the vista engineers got my suggestion and stabbed themselve in the face .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if the vista engineers got my suggestion and stabbed themselve in the face.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</id>
	<title>Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256226960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I get the impression that the Windows 7 launch is a lot like seeing an old girlfriend suddenly show up on your doorstep wanting to get back together.  She's had some work done, apparently: stomach stapling to take off some of the weight, breast augmentation, and a radical nosejob to make her look as much like your current girlfriend as medical science will allow.</p><p>She's pretty, of course, almost too pretty.  She still wears far too much makeup and carries that desperate look in her eyes.  The fragrant haze around her is the perfume she overuses to mask the scent of failure.</p><p>But standing there in that low-cut top, you'd almost forget for a moment what a psycho she was- how she used to shut down in the middle of a date and forget everything you were talking about and how she was only happy when you were buying her things. You'd almost forget about carrying around her legacy baggage or those nights when, for seemingly no reason at all, she would simply stop speaking to you and when you asked what was wrong she'd just spit a string of hex code at you and expect you to figure it out.</p><p>You complained about her for years before finally deciding to get rid of her, and here she is again.  Though, somehow she seems like a completely different person now.</p><p>"I'm up here," she says when she catches you staring at her chest.</p><p>Tempted though you may be, you know that over time she'll get bored and slow down on you just like she always does. And then you'll be right back where you started: trapped. She keeps you by convincing you that you don't have a choice. You're just not smart enough for one option or rich enough to afford the other.</p><p>"But I'm different now," she says, batting her eyes innocently. "I've changed."</p><p>Indeed she has.  Apparently, she's really into Cabala now or something like that.  It's helped her discover loads of untapped potential in herself. But it also means that you'll have to buy all new furniture to fit with her understanding of feng shui.  That's not the only change she has in store for you. The minute you let her move in, she'll have a new alarm system put in that succeeds only in preventing your friends from coming over on poker night.</p><p>She doesn't love you, but she doesn't hate you, either. The truth is that she couldn't care less one way or the other.  She's here because she doesn't want to be alone. Like all human beings, especially those well past their prime, she wants to feel wanted and, after a string of lost jobs and bad investments, she needs a place to stay.</p><p>But all in all, she's OK. She's a seven. She'll do, I guess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I get the impression that the Windows 7 launch is a lot like seeing an old girlfriend suddenly show up on your doorstep wanting to get back together .
She 's had some work done , apparently : stomach stapling to take off some of the weight , breast augmentation , and a radical nosejob to make her look as much like your current girlfriend as medical science will allow.She 's pretty , of course , almost too pretty .
She still wears far too much makeup and carries that desperate look in her eyes .
The fragrant haze around her is the perfume she overuses to mask the scent of failure.But standing there in that low-cut top , you 'd almost forget for a moment what a psycho she was- how she used to shut down in the middle of a date and forget everything you were talking about and how she was only happy when you were buying her things .
You 'd almost forget about carrying around her legacy baggage or those nights when , for seemingly no reason at all , she would simply stop speaking to you and when you asked what was wrong she 'd just spit a string of hex code at you and expect you to figure it out.You complained about her for years before finally deciding to get rid of her , and here she is again .
Though , somehow she seems like a completely different person now .
" I 'm up here , " she says when she catches you staring at her chest.Tempted though you may be , you know that over time she 'll get bored and slow down on you just like she always does .
And then you 'll be right back where you started : trapped .
She keeps you by convincing you that you do n't have a choice .
You 're just not smart enough for one option or rich enough to afford the other .
" But I 'm different now , " she says , batting her eyes innocently .
" I 've changed .
" Indeed she has .
Apparently , she 's really into Cabala now or something like that .
It 's helped her discover loads of untapped potential in herself .
But it also means that you 'll have to buy all new furniture to fit with her understanding of feng shui .
That 's not the only change she has in store for you .
The minute you let her move in , she 'll have a new alarm system put in that succeeds only in preventing your friends from coming over on poker night.She does n't love you , but she does n't hate you , either .
The truth is that she could n't care less one way or the other .
She 's here because she does n't want to be alone .
Like all human beings , especially those well past their prime , she wants to feel wanted and , after a string of lost jobs and bad investments , she needs a place to stay.But all in all , she 's OK. She 's a seven .
She 'll do , I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I get the impression that the Windows 7 launch is a lot like seeing an old girlfriend suddenly show up on your doorstep wanting to get back together.
She's had some work done, apparently: stomach stapling to take off some of the weight, breast augmentation, and a radical nosejob to make her look as much like your current girlfriend as medical science will allow.She's pretty, of course, almost too pretty.
She still wears far too much makeup and carries that desperate look in her eyes.
The fragrant haze around her is the perfume she overuses to mask the scent of failure.But standing there in that low-cut top, you'd almost forget for a moment what a psycho she was- how she used to shut down in the middle of a date and forget everything you were talking about and how she was only happy when you were buying her things.
You'd almost forget about carrying around her legacy baggage or those nights when, for seemingly no reason at all, she would simply stop speaking to you and when you asked what was wrong she'd just spit a string of hex code at you and expect you to figure it out.You complained about her for years before finally deciding to get rid of her, and here she is again.
Though, somehow she seems like a completely different person now.
"I'm up here," she says when she catches you staring at her chest.Tempted though you may be, you know that over time she'll get bored and slow down on you just like she always does.
And then you'll be right back where you started: trapped.
She keeps you by convincing you that you don't have a choice.
You're just not smart enough for one option or rich enough to afford the other.
"But I'm different now," she says, batting her eyes innocently.
"I've changed.
"Indeed she has.
Apparently, she's really into Cabala now or something like that.
It's helped her discover loads of untapped potential in herself.
But it also means that you'll have to buy all new furniture to fit with her understanding of feng shui.
That's not the only change she has in store for you.
The minute you let her move in, she'll have a new alarm system put in that succeeds only in preventing your friends from coming over on poker night.She doesn't love you, but she doesn't hate you, either.
The truth is that she couldn't care less one way or the other.
She's here because she doesn't want to be alone.
Like all human beings, especially those well past their prime, she wants to feel wanted and, after a string of lost jobs and bad investments, she needs a place to stay.But all in all, she's OK. She's a seven.
She'll do, I guess.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837309</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>vulgrin</author>
	<datestamp>1256235660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lets continue the analogy:</p><p>Your OSX Girlfriend shows up on your doorstep telling you to buy her a new Snow Leopard coat.  Oh, and you are going to need to get her some updated pants and shoes too to match.  Of course, she won't step inside your door until you've gone and bought one of those new Apple brand "iMansions" that, really, is just the same as the Intel Houses that everyone has, but comes with fancy aluminum siding and costs twice as much.  You could TRY to put aluminum siding on any old Intel house, but you hear those contractors are getting sued out of business.</p><p>So, you finally get the new mansion and invite her in and you realize that she's really just like every other girl you've been with.  But, all your friends like her, so you might as well go along with it.  She's arty, but very serious too, and won't play any games with you.  After a while, after buying her all her iAccessories you realize you really aren't getting any more out of her than your other girlfriends.</p><p>But your Linux girlfriend, she is awesome.  She'll do whatever you want, whenever you want, rarely complains and will stay in pretty much any house or mobile home you have.  Sadly, she's also a robot who gets delivered to your house in a box, and you have to assemble her up the way you want.  You have to turn to your friends and the internet to find out why the heck she won't talk with you, or why her feet are on backwards.  She's very secure in your relationship, so much that she won't do anything unless you really PROVE you are her boyfriend. She plays a few games, but you're getting sick of chess, solitaire and downhill sledding penguins.  And then every few weeks you have to shut her down to replace her heart and lungs.  You are so damn tired keeping her running and happy all the time who has time for sex?</p><p>To top it off, everyone has seen her naked.  She's put it all over the Internet for everyone to see and fiddle with her naughty bits.  She claims it makes her a better woman, but since you have to keep patching her up, you aren't so sure.  What's worse, she keeps comparing you to some guy she met in Finland and talks about how much he "got inside her."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lets continue the analogy : Your OSX Girlfriend shows up on your doorstep telling you to buy her a new Snow Leopard coat .
Oh , and you are going to need to get her some updated pants and shoes too to match .
Of course , she wo n't step inside your door until you 've gone and bought one of those new Apple brand " iMansions " that , really , is just the same as the Intel Houses that everyone has , but comes with fancy aluminum siding and costs twice as much .
You could TRY to put aluminum siding on any old Intel house , but you hear those contractors are getting sued out of business.So , you finally get the new mansion and invite her in and you realize that she 's really just like every other girl you 've been with .
But , all your friends like her , so you might as well go along with it .
She 's arty , but very serious too , and wo n't play any games with you .
After a while , after buying her all her iAccessories you realize you really are n't getting any more out of her than your other girlfriends.But your Linux girlfriend , she is awesome .
She 'll do whatever you want , whenever you want , rarely complains and will stay in pretty much any house or mobile home you have .
Sadly , she 's also a robot who gets delivered to your house in a box , and you have to assemble her up the way you want .
You have to turn to your friends and the internet to find out why the heck she wo n't talk with you , or why her feet are on backwards .
She 's very secure in your relationship , so much that she wo n't do anything unless you really PROVE you are her boyfriend .
She plays a few games , but you 're getting sick of chess , solitaire and downhill sledding penguins .
And then every few weeks you have to shut her down to replace her heart and lungs .
You are so damn tired keeping her running and happy all the time who has time for sex ? To top it off , everyone has seen her naked .
She 's put it all over the Internet for everyone to see and fiddle with her naughty bits .
She claims it makes her a better woman , but since you have to keep patching her up , you are n't so sure .
What 's worse , she keeps comparing you to some guy she met in Finland and talks about how much he " got inside her .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lets continue the analogy:Your OSX Girlfriend shows up on your doorstep telling you to buy her a new Snow Leopard coat.
Oh, and you are going to need to get her some updated pants and shoes too to match.
Of course, she won't step inside your door until you've gone and bought one of those new Apple brand "iMansions" that, really, is just the same as the Intel Houses that everyone has, but comes with fancy aluminum siding and costs twice as much.
You could TRY to put aluminum siding on any old Intel house, but you hear those contractors are getting sued out of business.So, you finally get the new mansion and invite her in and you realize that she's really just like every other girl you've been with.
But, all your friends like her, so you might as well go along with it.
She's arty, but very serious too, and won't play any games with you.
After a while, after buying her all her iAccessories you realize you really aren't getting any more out of her than your other girlfriends.But your Linux girlfriend, she is awesome.
She'll do whatever you want, whenever you want, rarely complains and will stay in pretty much any house or mobile home you have.
Sadly, she's also a robot who gets delivered to your house in a box, and you have to assemble her up the way you want.
You have to turn to your friends and the internet to find out why the heck she won't talk with you, or why her feet are on backwards.
She's very secure in your relationship, so much that she won't do anything unless you really PROVE you are her boyfriend.
She plays a few games, but you're getting sick of chess, solitaire and downhill sledding penguins.
And then every few weeks you have to shut her down to replace her heart and lungs.
You are so damn tired keeping her running and happy all the time who has time for sex?To top it off, everyone has seen her naked.
She's put it all over the Internet for everyone to see and fiddle with her naughty bits.
She claims it makes her a better woman, but since you have to keep patching her up, you aren't so sure.
What's worse, she keeps comparing you to some guy she met in Finland and talks about how much he "got inside her.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834771</id>
	<title>We Listened!</title>
	<author>db32</author>
	<datestamp>1256224320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>We heard what you wanted and were sure to avoid those things at all costs.  In the event that we could not avoid a given feature we made it practically impossible to use, moved the functionality to a new hidden location, or barrage you with popups and wizards to ensure you really want to use it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We heard what you wanted and were sure to avoid those things at all costs .
In the event that we could not avoid a given feature we made it practically impossible to use , moved the functionality to a new hidden location , or barrage you with popups and wizards to ensure you really want to use it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We heard what you wanted and were sure to avoid those things at all costs.
In the event that we could not avoid a given feature we made it practically impossible to use, moved the functionality to a new hidden location, or barrage you with popups and wizards to ensure you really want to use it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837007</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>bluie-</author>
	<datestamp>1256234220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So what you're saying is... I should have some fun with her then kick her out?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what you 're saying is... I should have some fun with her then kick her out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what you're saying is... I should have some fun with her then kick her out?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834885</id>
	<title>Yet another troll...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256225040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sad to see another anti-MS troll who's never bothered to use Win 7 and find out if it's good or not before bashing it.  Vista sucked, as have most MS products.  However, Win 7 is actually <i>good</i>.  I know die-hard Mac fanboys who have tried Win 7 and loved it.  The fact that you got modded insightful for trolling amazes me....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sad to see another anti-MS troll who 's never bothered to use Win 7 and find out if it 's good or not before bashing it .
Vista sucked , as have most MS products .
However , Win 7 is actually good .
I know die-hard Mac fanboys who have tried Win 7 and loved it .
The fact that you got modded insightful for trolling amazes me... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sad to see another anti-MS troll who's never bothered to use Win 7 and find out if it's good or not before bashing it.
Vista sucked, as have most MS products.
However, Win 7 is actually good.
I know die-hard Mac fanboys who have tried Win 7 and loved it.
The fact that you got modded insightful for trolling amazes me....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834797</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835269</id>
	<title>Waffle?</title>
	<author>Burnhard</author>
	<datestamp>1256226960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article waffled on a bit and at the end of it I'd learnt absolutely nothing, because they didn't actually say anything.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article waffled on a bit and at the end of it I 'd learnt absolutely nothing , because they did n't actually say anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article waffled on a bit and at the end of it I'd learnt absolutely nothing, because they didn't actually say anything.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842059</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>daver00</author>
	<datestamp>1256221560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They have changed the kernel completely, not modified it, completely changed it to a different one. I know 7 follows the same driver model as vista and has basically the same UI with some improvements, but it is just not true that this is a Vista service pack. If you make that argument then you might as well say XP was Win2K SP5 or whatever they were up to at the time.</p><p>They are now the running Server 2008 kernel inside Win 7, and that is not a light upgrade, or even a service pack upgrade. That is a complete redesign of the core architecture.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They have changed the kernel completely , not modified it , completely changed it to a different one .
I know 7 follows the same driver model as vista and has basically the same UI with some improvements , but it is just not true that this is a Vista service pack .
If you make that argument then you might as well say XP was Win2K SP5 or whatever they were up to at the time.They are now the running Server 2008 kernel inside Win 7 , and that is not a light upgrade , or even a service pack upgrade .
That is a complete redesign of the core architecture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They have changed the kernel completely, not modified it, completely changed it to a different one.
I know 7 follows the same driver model as vista and has basically the same UI with some improvements, but it is just not true that this is a Vista service pack.
If you make that argument then you might as well say XP was Win2K SP5 or whatever they were up to at the time.They are now the running Server 2008 kernel inside Win 7, and that is not a light upgrade, or even a service pack upgrade.
That is a complete redesign of the core architecture.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29843219</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256239260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What crap to keep the analogy, just marry Mac and live happily ever after.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What crap to keep the analogy , just marry Mac and live happily ever after .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What crap to keep the analogy, just marry Mac and live happily ever after.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838461</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>turing\_m</author>
	<datestamp>1256240340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Genius.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Genius .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Genius.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834803</id>
	<title>Another Slashervertisment for Bill's Winders</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256224500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is with all the "Windows 7" articles recently? Yea, sure people need to know what is about to be shoved up their butts, however these are beginning to feel like slashvertisments.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is with all the " Windows 7 " articles recently ?
Yea , sure people need to know what is about to be shoved up their butts , however these are beginning to feel like slashvertisments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is with all the "Windows 7" articles recently?
Yea, sure people need to know what is about to be shoved up their butts, however these are beginning to feel like slashvertisments.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842069</id>
	<title>Seems familair...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256221740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember reading an article that was titles "Hillary, the psycho ex-girlfriend" about 2 years ago that was basically this article.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember reading an article that was titles " Hillary , the psycho ex-girlfriend " about 2 years ago that was basically this article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember reading an article that was titles "Hillary, the psycho ex-girlfriend" about 2 years ago that was basically this article.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839715</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256203680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cabala?  Is that some sort of religion surrounding hunting and fishing goods?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cabala ?
Is that some sort of religion surrounding hunting and fishing goods ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cabala?
Is that some sort of religion surrounding hunting and fishing goods?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29843001</id>
	<title>Re:We Listened!</title>
	<author>agustkara</author>
	<datestamp>1256235360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I told them to stick it up their ass. I guess they did. Everyone is saying it looks more polished and better shaped.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I told them to stick it up their ass .
I guess they did .
Everyone is saying it looks more polished and better shaped .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I told them to stick it up their ass.
I guess they did.
Everyone is saying it looks more polished and better shaped.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834771</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836403</id>
	<title>+1, insightful</title>
	<author>caseih</author>
	<datestamp>1256231880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too bad this brilliant little piece of prose is already rated at +5, Funny.  In reality it should be +5, Insightful.  It is both funny and insightful.  So close to the truth as far as most people's relationship with Windows goes that it actually hurts!  Best comment I think I've ever read on slashdot. Bravo.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad this brilliant little piece of prose is already rated at + 5 , Funny .
In reality it should be + 5 , Insightful .
It is both funny and insightful .
So close to the truth as far as most people 's relationship with Windows goes that it actually hurts !
Best comment I think I 've ever read on slashdot .
Bravo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad this brilliant little piece of prose is already rated at +5, Funny.
In reality it should be +5, Insightful.
It is both funny and insightful.
So close to the truth as far as most people's relationship with Windows goes that it actually hurts!
Best comment I think I've ever read on slashdot.
Bravo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836097</id>
	<title>Re:Dear God...</title>
	<author>ZarathustraDK</author>
	<datestamp>1256230380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>UAC?<br> <br>

An updated Clippy?</htmltext>
<tokenext>UAC ?
An updated Clippy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>UAC?
An updated Clippy?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837817</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>Cro Magnon</author>
	<datestamp>1256237520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, the crashes weren't all bad.  Back when I was using W95 at work, I took coffee breaks every time it crashed in the morning.  Of course I paid for it; I was in the bathroom during its afternoon crashes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the crashes were n't all bad .
Back when I was using W95 at work , I took coffee breaks every time it crashed in the morning .
Of course I paid for it ; I was in the bathroom during its afternoon crashes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the crashes weren't all bad.
Back when I was using W95 at work, I took coffee breaks every time it crashed in the morning.
Of course I paid for it; I was in the bathroom during its afternoon crashes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834775</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836857</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256233740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>just had to say, this is a near flawless analogy, brilliant!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>just had to say , this is a near flawless analogy , brilliant !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just had to say, this is a near flawless analogy, brilliant!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29850825</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256289120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is misogynist and gross.  The fact that everyone here loves it is proof that slashdot sucks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is misogynist and gross .
The fact that everyone here loves it is proof that slashdot sucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is misogynist and gross.
The fact that everyone here loves it is proof that slashdot sucks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839417</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256202060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hereby dub thee "PerfectAnalogyGuy"!! =P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hereby dub thee " PerfectAnalogyGuy " ! !
= P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hereby dub thee "PerfectAnalogyGuy"!!
=P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837233</id>
	<title>Re:Install</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256235360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The window decorations and menubars are way too big (on my relatively small screen - 1440x900) and take up way too much vertical space - handling multiple windows at once is almost impossible and the taskbar thingummy doesn't really help much - and the system doesn't want me to use a font any smaller than I'm currently using. The taskbar is too wide and you can't change it, but autohiding helps some. The icons on my desktop are too big and there seems to be no way to change that either. </i></p><p>I'm sure you can change all of those.  Dig around in the personalize or appearance dialogues.   The taskbar can go back to Vista mode, or into a Win7-style one but the same size as Vista/XPs, I also forgot how, but there are sources out there.  Google is your friend.  Something about clicking "use small icons" in properties.  Have you tried resizing your desktop icons in the same way you do on Vista?</p><p>My main beef with the task bar, is mounting on the side of the screen, you can't modify where the "start" menu goes.  It would be much more handy on the bottom, than on the top.</p><p><i>I had to go to websites and get drivers to install (most of which required reboots) and in several cases was told that there are no drivers for that device for win7. </i></p><p>This is always a problem with brand new OSs, and drivers are always a pain in the ass.  Installing a Creative X-Fi driver required around 5 reboots, and sever jaunts to the internet to get the full features.  Driver devs haven't quite jumped on the bandwagon of x64, much less Windows 7.</p><p>Also, as a Linux user, I'm used to driver hell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The window decorations and menubars are way too big ( on my relatively small screen - 1440x900 ) and take up way too much vertical space - handling multiple windows at once is almost impossible and the taskbar thingummy does n't really help much - and the system does n't want me to use a font any smaller than I 'm currently using .
The taskbar is too wide and you ca n't change it , but autohiding helps some .
The icons on my desktop are too big and there seems to be no way to change that either .
I 'm sure you can change all of those .
Dig around in the personalize or appearance dialogues .
The taskbar can go back to Vista mode , or into a Win7-style one but the same size as Vista/XPs , I also forgot how , but there are sources out there .
Google is your friend .
Something about clicking " use small icons " in properties .
Have you tried resizing your desktop icons in the same way you do on Vista ? My main beef with the task bar , is mounting on the side of the screen , you ca n't modify where the " start " menu goes .
It would be much more handy on the bottom , than on the top.I had to go to websites and get drivers to install ( most of which required reboots ) and in several cases was told that there are no drivers for that device for win7 .
This is always a problem with brand new OSs , and drivers are always a pain in the ass .
Installing a Creative X-Fi driver required around 5 reboots , and sever jaunts to the internet to get the full features .
Driver devs have n't quite jumped on the bandwagon of x64 , much less Windows 7.Also , as a Linux user , I 'm used to driver hell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The window decorations and menubars are way too big (on my relatively small screen - 1440x900) and take up way too much vertical space - handling multiple windows at once is almost impossible and the taskbar thingummy doesn't really help much - and the system doesn't want me to use a font any smaller than I'm currently using.
The taskbar is too wide and you can't change it, but autohiding helps some.
The icons on my desktop are too big and there seems to be no way to change that either.
I'm sure you can change all of those.
Dig around in the personalize or appearance dialogues.
The taskbar can go back to Vista mode, or into a Win7-style one but the same size as Vista/XPs, I also forgot how, but there are sources out there.
Google is your friend.
Something about clicking "use small icons" in properties.
Have you tried resizing your desktop icons in the same way you do on Vista?My main beef with the task bar, is mounting on the side of the screen, you can't modify where the "start" menu goes.
It would be much more handy on the bottom, than on the top.I had to go to websites and get drivers to install (most of which required reboots) and in several cases was told that there are no drivers for that device for win7.
This is always a problem with brand new OSs, and drivers are always a pain in the ass.
Installing a Creative X-Fi driver required around 5 reboots, and sever jaunts to the internet to get the full features.
Driver devs haven't quite jumped on the bandwagon of x64, much less Windows 7.Also, as a Linux user, I'm used to driver hell.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836063</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838333</id>
	<title>Re:Another Slashervertisment for Bill's Winders</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256239740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What are Bill's Winders? Are those what Bill uses to roll down the windows in his car that lacks power windows?</p><p>dom</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What are Bill 's Winders ?
Are those what Bill uses to roll down the windows in his car that lacks power windows ? dom</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What are Bill's Winders?
Are those what Bill uses to roll down the windows in his car that lacks power windows?dom</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836491</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256232300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People agree that 'Vista Sucks', so I'd say that the version that came after it is Windows Sucks Plus One(tm).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People agree that 'Vista Sucks ' , so I 'd say that the version that came after it is Windows Sucks Plus One ( tm ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People agree that 'Vista Sucks', so I'd say that the version that came after it is Windows Sucks Plus One(tm).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836877</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7 audience...</title>
	<author>WiiVault</author>
	<datestamp>1256233800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your only a troll is you bitch for no reason. Frankly the ribbon, and the general dumbing down of all MS products in the last decade is not a flame but the damned truth. I don't get how a company who sucks at almost everything they try can be so successfull. Detroit got smacked, what about Redmond?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your only a troll is you bitch for no reason .
Frankly the ribbon , and the general dumbing down of all MS products in the last decade is not a flame but the damned truth .
I do n't get how a company who sucks at almost everything they try can be so successfull .
Detroit got smacked , what about Redmond ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your only a troll is you bitch for no reason.
Frankly the ribbon, and the general dumbing down of all MS products in the last decade is not a flame but the damned truth.
I don't get how a company who sucks at almost everything they try can be so successfull.
Detroit got smacked, what about Redmond?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838091</id>
	<title>Listened my ass: Junction Points</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1256238600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"moved functionality"</p><p>Appdata.  I wanted to do some tweaking on Google Chrome.  I was directed to the Appdata folder to diddle around.  Hmmmmmmm.  I AIN'T GOT NO APPDATA FOLDER!!!  WAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!  So, what do I do now?</p><p>Some googling around found it for me: C:\Users\Users\Guy\Appdata\Google\Chrome\</p><p>But, the reading I've done (all of about 7 or 8 minutes) tells me that it's not a real path - it's being redirected to someplace else.  Bahhhh.  I'll get this figured out sooner or later.  So far, I've figured out that Windows Explorer won't open the \Appdata folder, but it will open a subfolder.  Command prompt opens both the AppData folder and subfolders.</p><p>Junction points.  Read about them here: <a href="http://www.svrops.com/svrops/articles/jpoints.htm" title="svrops.com">http://www.svrops.com/svrops/articles/jpoints.htm</a> [svrops.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" moved functionality " Appdata .
I wanted to do some tweaking on Google Chrome .
I was directed to the Appdata folder to diddle around .
Hmmmmmmm. I AI N'T GOT NO APPDATA FOLDER ! ! !
WAAAAHHHHHH ! ! ! ! ! So , what do I do now ? Some googling around found it for me : C : \ Users \ Users \ Guy \ Appdata \ Google \ Chrome \ But , the reading I 've done ( all of about 7 or 8 minutes ) tells me that it 's not a real path - it 's being redirected to someplace else .
Bahhhh. I 'll get this figured out sooner or later .
So far , I 've figured out that Windows Explorer wo n't open the \ Appdata folder , but it will open a subfolder .
Command prompt opens both the AppData folder and subfolders.Junction points .
Read about them here : http : //www.svrops.com/svrops/articles/jpoints.htm [ svrops.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"moved functionality"Appdata.
I wanted to do some tweaking on Google Chrome.
I was directed to the Appdata folder to diddle around.
Hmmmmmmm.  I AIN'T GOT NO APPDATA FOLDER!!!
WAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!  So, what do I do now?Some googling around found it for me: C:\Users\Users\Guy\Appdata\Google\Chrome\But, the reading I've done (all of about 7 or 8 minutes) tells me that it's not a real path - it's being redirected to someplace else.
Bahhhh.  I'll get this figured out sooner or later.
So far, I've figured out that Windows Explorer won't open the \Appdata folder, but it will open a subfolder.
Command prompt opens both the AppData folder and subfolders.Junction points.
Read about them here: http://www.svrops.com/svrops/articles/jpoints.htm [svrops.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834771</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844153</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>gingerjoos</author>
	<datestamp>1256298780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>awesome dude.. agree that this is one of the best<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. posts I've seen</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>awesome dude.. agree that this is one of the best / .
posts I 've seen</tokentext>
<sentencetext>awesome dude.. agree that this is one of the best /.
posts I've seen</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838113</id>
	<title>Re:Lack of feedback</title>
	<author>gad\_zuki!</author>
	<datestamp>1256238720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;I can easily contact the developers. I can submit bugs.</p><p>And wait for the "fix it yourself" smartass replies. Lets not exaggerate the kindness of FOSS developers.  The big issue is that you can have the code and change it, but expecting someone else to do so results in scenarios not too different from commercial software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I can easily contact the developers .
I can submit bugs.And wait for the " fix it yourself " smartass replies .
Lets not exaggerate the kindness of FOSS developers .
The big issue is that you can have the code and change it , but expecting someone else to do so results in scenarios not too different from commercial software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;I can easily contact the developers.
I can submit bugs.And wait for the "fix it yourself" smartass replies.
Lets not exaggerate the kindness of FOSS developers.
The big issue is that you can have the code and change it, but expecting someone else to do so results in scenarios not too different from commercial software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835485</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836343</id>
	<title>Re:Let's give the devil his due</title>
	<author>Mashiki</author>
	<datestamp>1256231580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm actually not sure how this got to +4 funny.  Maybe +5 interesting?  I digress.  I've been a fan of Win2k for a long time, I used it for just about everything from gaming to my work up until XP64 and had a stable driver set.  Does Win7 have that nifty feel of Win2k?  Yes actually it does.  Even on lower end hardware it's decently snappy, and runs well.</p><p>Issues?  The biggest I've found is it's ability to lose connection to the internet on reboots.  Meaning you need to disable and reenable your network card which fixes it.  Sadly no new drivers for my card, but otherwise works fine.  I consider that a 2 on my 1-10(10 being worst) scale of crap.  Otherwise, I'm quite happy.  My XP64 machine has been up and running for a bit more than 460 days now without a reboot.  I expect that Win7 will beat that easily.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm actually not sure how this got to + 4 funny .
Maybe + 5 interesting ?
I digress .
I 've been a fan of Win2k for a long time , I used it for just about everything from gaming to my work up until XP64 and had a stable driver set .
Does Win7 have that nifty feel of Win2k ?
Yes actually it does .
Even on lower end hardware it 's decently snappy , and runs well.Issues ?
The biggest I 've found is it 's ability to lose connection to the internet on reboots .
Meaning you need to disable and reenable your network card which fixes it .
Sadly no new drivers for my card , but otherwise works fine .
I consider that a 2 on my 1-10 ( 10 being worst ) scale of crap .
Otherwise , I 'm quite happy .
My XP64 machine has been up and running for a bit more than 460 days now without a reboot .
I expect that Win7 will beat that easily .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm actually not sure how this got to +4 funny.
Maybe +5 interesting?
I digress.
I've been a fan of Win2k for a long time, I used it for just about everything from gaming to my work up until XP64 and had a stable driver set.
Does Win7 have that nifty feel of Win2k?
Yes actually it does.
Even on lower end hardware it's decently snappy, and runs well.Issues?
The biggest I've found is it's ability to lose connection to the internet on reboots.
Meaning you need to disable and reenable your network card which fixes it.
Sadly no new drivers for my card, but otherwise works fine.
I consider that a 2 on my 1-10(10 being worst) scale of crap.
Otherwise, I'm quite happy.
My XP64 machine has been up and running for a bit more than 460 days now without a reboot.
I expect that Win7 will beat that easily.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837359</id>
	<title>No More Obsolesence!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256235900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's right!  We heard that you are sick and tired of paying for Windows 2000 over and over and over and over, so Windows 7 is the very last one, and we promise to fix its bugs and maintain it with opdated hardware drivers and minor revisions until the next new paradigm shift in operating systems occurs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's right !
We heard that you are sick and tired of paying for Windows 2000 over and over and over and over , so Windows 7 is the very last one , and we promise to fix its bugs and maintain it with opdated hardware drivers and minor revisions until the next new paradigm shift in operating systems occurs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's right!
We heard that you are sick and tired of paying for Windows 2000 over and over and over and over, so Windows 7 is the very last one, and we promise to fix its bugs and maintain it with opdated hardware drivers and minor revisions until the next new paradigm shift in operating systems occurs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842649</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256229480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, so you're a geek guy who never had a girlfriend? Or you only had one and you haven't broken up yet? Or you just don't like the way that kind of remark can suddenly head off towards sexism when geeks are conversing? Or did you just not think the original was very, well, original? Or maybe you just like expressing disapproval?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , so you 're a geek guy who never had a girlfriend ?
Or you only had one and you have n't broken up yet ?
Or you just do n't like the way that kind of remark can suddenly head off towards sexism when geeks are conversing ?
Or did you just not think the original was very , well , original ?
Or maybe you just like expressing disapproval ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, so you're a geek guy who never had a girlfriend?
Or you only had one and you haven't broken up yet?
Or you just don't like the way that kind of remark can suddenly head off towards sexism when geeks are conversing?
Or did you just not think the original was very, well, original?
Or maybe you just like expressing disapproval?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835137</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256226300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>oh come on now.  Since XP was released the random 'crashing' isn't prevalent any more.<br>If you have bad hardware or are overclocking, that is a different story, but also your own fault. <br>Lets be reasonable, this is like a wife of 30 years, bringing up stuff you did in high school!</htmltext>
<tokenext>oh come on now .
Since XP was released the random 'crashing ' is n't prevalent any more.If you have bad hardware or are overclocking , that is a different story , but also your own fault .
Lets be reasonable , this is like a wife of 30 years , bringing up stuff you did in high school !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oh come on now.
Since XP was released the random 'crashing' isn't prevalent any more.If you have bad hardware or are overclocking, that is a different story, but also your own fault.
Lets be reasonable, this is like a wife of 30 years, bringing up stuff you did in high school!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834775</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834889</id>
	<title>Nothing to see here</title>
	<author>headhot</author>
	<datestamp>1256225100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its a pretty useless article. You don't get any more info out of the article then you get from the title.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its a pretty useless article .
You do n't get any more info out of the article then you get from the title .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its a pretty useless article.
You don't get any more info out of the article then you get from the title.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842357</id>
	<title>this is simply perfect!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256225520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.efeitosvisuais.com/blog/2009/10/23/lancamento-do-windows-7-opiniao-do-leitor-do-slashdot/" title="efeitosvisuais.com" rel="nofollow">translated to portuguese here. Source credited.</a> [efeitosvisuais.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>translated to portuguese here .
Source credited .
[ efeitosvisuais.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>translated to portuguese here.
Source credited.
[efeitosvisuais.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842727</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder if they got my vista sugestion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256230800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know if YOU got my suggestion and fucked yourself up in the ass. Moron.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know if YOU got my suggestion and fucked yourself up in the ass .
Moron .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know if YOU got my suggestion and fucked yourself up in the ass.
Moron.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834809</id>
	<title>Feedback</title>
	<author>Thanshin</author>
	<datestamp>1256224560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We took all the feedback.<br>Printed it.<br>Made bricks with the printed feedback and some glue.<br>Built a piramid with the bricks.<br>Painted it green and brown.<br>Called it Mount Feedji.<br>Burned it down in a massive party.</p><p>Then, still drunk from the party, we designed W7.</p><p>.</p><p>Ok, that was a lie. We didn't actually paint it. But we considered that suggestion for quite a long while.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We took all the feedback.Printed it.Made bricks with the printed feedback and some glue.Built a piramid with the bricks.Painted it green and brown.Called it Mount Feedji.Burned it down in a massive party.Then , still drunk from the party , we designed W7..Ok , that was a lie .
We did n't actually paint it .
But we considered that suggestion for quite a long while .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We took all the feedback.Printed it.Made bricks with the printed feedback and some glue.Built a piramid with the bricks.Painted it green and brown.Called it Mount Feedji.Burned it down in a massive party.Then, still drunk from the party, we designed W7..Ok, that was a lie.
We didn't actually paint it.
But we considered that suggestion for quite a long while.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836829</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>WiiVault</author>
	<datestamp>1256233620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cheers friend. The best post I have seen on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. in years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cheers friend .
The best post I have seen on / .
in years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cheers friend.
The best post I have seen on /.
in years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835485</id>
	<title>Lack of feedback</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1256227860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't want to sound like a broken record here, but one of the things I truly love about OSS development is how transparent development is. I can easily contact the developers. I can submit bugs.</p><p>I have tons of usability gripes with Windows. I've never felt like I could submit feedback to Microsoft that might be seen and looked at.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't want to sound like a broken record here , but one of the things I truly love about OSS development is how transparent development is .
I can easily contact the developers .
I can submit bugs.I have tons of usability gripes with Windows .
I 've never felt like I could submit feedback to Microsoft that might be seen and looked at .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't want to sound like a broken record here, but one of the things I truly love about OSS development is how transparent development is.
I can easily contact the developers.
I can submit bugs.I have tons of usability gripes with Windows.
I've never felt like I could submit feedback to Microsoft that might be seen and looked at.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838901</id>
	<title>Re:Lack of feedback</title>
	<author>EvanED</author>
	<datestamp>1256242560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I can easily contact the developers. I can submit bugs....</i><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...and have them <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show\_bug.cgi?id=4914" title="openoffice.org" rel="nofollow">ignored</a> [openoffice.org]. (Request for feature in OpenOffice. Has 215 votes and 30 printed pages of comments, the vast majority of which are "the lack of this feature is the only thing keeping me from using OO." Been open over 7 years now, and we don't have anything even remotely like a timeline. I chose that one because I've had 2 votes (the max for a single issue) sitting on it for a couple years now.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can easily contact the developers .
I can submit bugs.... ...and have them ignored [ openoffice.org ] .
( Request for feature in OpenOffice .
Has 215 votes and 30 printed pages of comments , the vast majority of which are " the lack of this feature is the only thing keeping me from using OO .
" Been open over 7 years now , and we do n't have anything even remotely like a timeline .
I chose that one because I 've had 2 votes ( the max for a single issue ) sitting on it for a couple years now .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can easily contact the developers.
I can submit bugs.... ...and have them ignored [openoffice.org].
(Request for feature in OpenOffice.
Has 215 votes and 30 printed pages of comments, the vast majority of which are "the lack of this feature is the only thing keeping me from using OO.
" Been open over 7 years now, and we don't have anything even remotely like a timeline.
I chose that one because I've had 2 votes (the max for a single issue) sitting on it for a couple years now.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835485</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839001</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256243100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>At least for me Vista runs a whole lot better than Windows ME ever ran</p></div><p>hahahahaha - AAAAHAhAhahhahahah - HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA - best fail post yet <br>
ME is notorious for how bad it was - might as well say Vista runs much better than my speak and spell ever talked...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least for me Vista runs a whole lot better than Windows ME ever ranhahahahaha - AAAAHAhAhahhahahah - HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA - best fail post yet ME is notorious for how bad it was - might as well say Vista runs much better than my speak and spell ever talked.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least for me Vista runs a whole lot better than Windows ME ever ranhahahahaha - AAAAHAhAhahhahahah - HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA - best fail post yet 
ME is notorious for how bad it was - might as well say Vista runs much better than my speak and spell ever talked...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29851383</id>
	<title>Re:Let's give the devil his due</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256291220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dig around and figure out how to disable ipv6 in win7. It's enabled by default and can cause some troubles like this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dig around and figure out how to disable ipv6 in win7 .
It 's enabled by default and can cause some troubles like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dig around and figure out how to disable ipv6 in win7.
It's enabled by default and can cause some troubles like this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836343</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836121</id>
	<title>Re:An F-15 is much bigger than a P-51. OMG BLOAT!</title>
	<author>TheDarkMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1256230440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why use 30MB to do task "X" if you can make a program to do <i>the same task</i> (and with the same funcionality) using 10MB? This is the point of Vista/7 versus XP question.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why use 30MB to do task " X " if you can make a program to do the same task ( and with the same funcionality ) using 10MB ?
This is the point of Vista/7 versus XP question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why use 30MB to do task "X" if you can make a program to do the same task (and with the same funcionality) using 10MB?
This is the point of Vista/7 versus XP question.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837867</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256237700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is brilliant, absolutely brilliant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is brilliant , absolutely brilliant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is brilliant, absolutely brilliant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29841103</id>
	<title>Re:Dear God...</title>
	<author>zuperduperman</author>
	<datestamp>1256211780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; I yet have to find someone who can show me what it brings me, over XP, that is worth paying 100+ EUR for.</p><p>Well, nobody can account for how cheap you might be or how much you value something.</p><p>However - if you're talking about a comparison with XP then I think there is an enormous list of stuff that is worth having.   UAC is a genuine security improvement.  Real support for transparency and big performance improvements in how windows are drawn and composited (it is all done natively on the graphics card, if your card supports it).  Individual control of volume levels for each application.   Ability to prioritize network traffic on a per-connection basis.   Live thumbnail previews of windows when using alt-tab / hover over taskbar items.  Built in color management and subpixel font anti-aliasing in system dialogs.  Better utilization / performance on multi-core architectures...</p><p>Nothing I can say can affect how you value these things, but the fact is there are a huge number of substantial improvements in Vista alone over XP, and Win7 is a marked improvement over that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I yet have to find someone who can show me what it brings me , over XP , that is worth paying 100 + EUR for.Well , nobody can account for how cheap you might be or how much you value something.However - if you 're talking about a comparison with XP then I think there is an enormous list of stuff that is worth having .
UAC is a genuine security improvement .
Real support for transparency and big performance improvements in how windows are drawn and composited ( it is all done natively on the graphics card , if your card supports it ) .
Individual control of volume levels for each application .
Ability to prioritize network traffic on a per-connection basis .
Live thumbnail previews of windows when using alt-tab / hover over taskbar items .
Built in color management and subpixel font anti-aliasing in system dialogs .
Better utilization / performance on multi-core architectures...Nothing I can say can affect how you value these things , but the fact is there are a huge number of substantial improvements in Vista alone over XP , and Win7 is a marked improvement over that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I yet have to find someone who can show me what it brings me, over XP, that is worth paying 100+ EUR for.Well, nobody can account for how cheap you might be or how much you value something.However - if you're talking about a comparison with XP then I think there is an enormous list of stuff that is worth having.
UAC is a genuine security improvement.
Real support for transparency and big performance improvements in how windows are drawn and composited (it is all done natively on the graphics card, if your card supports it).
Individual control of volume levels for each application.
Ability to prioritize network traffic on a per-connection basis.
Live thumbnail previews of windows when using alt-tab / hover over taskbar items.
Built in color management and subpixel font anti-aliasing in system dialogs.
Better utilization / performance on multi-core architectures...Nothing I can say can affect how you value these things, but the fact is there are a huge number of substantial improvements in Vista alone over XP, and Win7 is a marked improvement over that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836375</id>
	<title>That's not Windows</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256231700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That sounds more like Mac OS X 10.7 Cougar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That sounds more like Mac OS X 10.7 Cougar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That sounds more like Mac OS X 10.7 Cougar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844555</id>
	<title>Re:Window's Explorer...</title>
	<author>RzUpAnmsCwrds</author>
	<datestamp>1256303460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Can I just have a 64-bit windows operating system that will keep up with the latest graphics drivers.</p></div></blockquote><p>Yes, you can. Intel, AMD (ATI), and NVIDIA both release drivers for Vista/7 64-bit and Vista/7 32-bit at the same time.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I just have a 64-bit windows operating system that will keep up with the latest graphics drivers.Yes , you can .
Intel , AMD ( ATI ) , and NVIDIA both release drivers for Vista/7 64-bit and Vista/7 32-bit at the same time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I just have a 64-bit windows operating system that will keep up with the latest graphics drivers.Yes, you can.
Intel, AMD (ATI), and NVIDIA both release drivers for Vista/7 64-bit and Vista/7 32-bit at the same time.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835321</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836063</id>
	<title>Install</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256230260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I just installed windows 7 professional.    Easy install except for the multitude of reboots - at one point it rebooted, said it was installing updates, then rebooted again, installed more updates and rebooted again, installed more updates - and then let me log in.   Tiring.
</p><p>
I then went through the pain of installing all the programs I want - mostly things like python and a jdk and eclipse and yahoo messenger, and as is usual in the windows ecosystem, many of these things wanted to install their own toolbar (hmm, not python or ghc<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) and whatever other cruft someone thinks is essential.   This isn't a problem with windows 7, but rather with the windows mindset, which is that the user is too stupid to know what to do, so someone else should decide - and then make it hard to change.    Yahoo messenger though had some problems - when a chat window opened it opened almost maximized (didn't fill the screen, but had no title bar and the top part of the window was off screen) - it took some time to figure out that if I resized the window, it would snap back to normal.  But I needed to do that with every chat window that opened.   This was not happening on Vista or XP.
</p><p>
IE wants to have Bing as your default search provider and makes it hard to change.   I changed this twice to Google (which took some doing) and then the machine would reboot and it would be Bing again.   No wonder Bing usage is increasing.    Firefox got stuck in "safemode" and it took some work to find out how to unset that - had to restart firefox, not from the "recently used items" menu, but from the disk copy.     Why it was in "safemode" in the first place, I really do not know.
</p><p>
The window decorations and menubars are way too big (on my relatively small screen - 1440x900) and take up way too much vertical space - handling multiple windows at once is almost impossible and the taskbar thingummy doesn't really help much - and the system doesn't want me to use a font any smaller than I'm currently using.    The taskbar is too wide and you can't change it, but autohiding helps some.   The icons on my desktop are too big and there seems to be no way to change that either.      There's a cute analog clock which I rather like, but it is huge and won't get any smaller, nor can you move it right up into a corner - it snaps back to the middle of the screen.   When some notification windows are active (including the "change search provider" one which was quite slow), it was impossible to move or resize the parent window - very annoying.
</p><p>
I had to go to websites and get drivers to install (most of which required reboots) and in several cases was told that there are no drivers for that device for win7.
</p><p>
The system seems to run ok - not fast, but acceptable on this hardware (not the best in the world).   If you have any number of windows open, things get slow quickly though - changing windows or applications has a perceptible lag (when more than just a few things are running).
</p><p>
I'm sure that some of these problems will be fixed - drivers will become available quickly enough and I'll probably find workarounds for others, or some nice person will tell me "thats easy, just do this...",  but some of them are just "the user is stupid, don't let the user do things we (microsoft, yahoo...) don't want them to do".    Sadly enough, this attitude is becoming more prevalent in linux as well, but has a long, long way to go before it reaches the level of contempt shown in the windows world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just installed windows 7 professional .
Easy install except for the multitude of reboots - at one point it rebooted , said it was installing updates , then rebooted again , installed more updates and rebooted again , installed more updates - and then let me log in .
Tiring . I then went through the pain of installing all the programs I want - mostly things like python and a jdk and eclipse and yahoo messenger , and as is usual in the windows ecosystem , many of these things wanted to install their own toolbar ( hmm , not python or ghc : ) and whatever other cruft someone thinks is essential .
This is n't a problem with windows 7 , but rather with the windows mindset , which is that the user is too stupid to know what to do , so someone else should decide - and then make it hard to change .
Yahoo messenger though had some problems - when a chat window opened it opened almost maximized ( did n't fill the screen , but had no title bar and the top part of the window was off screen ) - it took some time to figure out that if I resized the window , it would snap back to normal .
But I needed to do that with every chat window that opened .
This was not happening on Vista or XP .
IE wants to have Bing as your default search provider and makes it hard to change .
I changed this twice to Google ( which took some doing ) and then the machine would reboot and it would be Bing again .
No wonder Bing usage is increasing .
Firefox got stuck in " safemode " and it took some work to find out how to unset that - had to restart firefox , not from the " recently used items " menu , but from the disk copy .
Why it was in " safemode " in the first place , I really do not know .
The window decorations and menubars are way too big ( on my relatively small screen - 1440x900 ) and take up way too much vertical space - handling multiple windows at once is almost impossible and the taskbar thingummy does n't really help much - and the system does n't want me to use a font any smaller than I 'm currently using .
The taskbar is too wide and you ca n't change it , but autohiding helps some .
The icons on my desktop are too big and there seems to be no way to change that either .
There 's a cute analog clock which I rather like , but it is huge and wo n't get any smaller , nor can you move it right up into a corner - it snaps back to the middle of the screen .
When some notification windows are active ( including the " change search provider " one which was quite slow ) , it was impossible to move or resize the parent window - very annoying .
I had to go to websites and get drivers to install ( most of which required reboots ) and in several cases was told that there are no drivers for that device for win7 .
The system seems to run ok - not fast , but acceptable on this hardware ( not the best in the world ) .
If you have any number of windows open , things get slow quickly though - changing windows or applications has a perceptible lag ( when more than just a few things are running ) .
I 'm sure that some of these problems will be fixed - drivers will become available quickly enough and I 'll probably find workarounds for others , or some nice person will tell me " thats easy , just do this... " , but some of them are just " the user is stupid , do n't let the user do things we ( microsoft , yahoo... ) do n't want them to do " .
Sadly enough , this attitude is becoming more prevalent in linux as well , but has a long , long way to go before it reaches the level of contempt shown in the windows world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I just installed windows 7 professional.
Easy install except for the multitude of reboots - at one point it rebooted, said it was installing updates, then rebooted again, installed more updates and rebooted again, installed more updates - and then let me log in.
Tiring.

I then went through the pain of installing all the programs I want - mostly things like python and a jdk and eclipse and yahoo messenger, and as is usual in the windows ecosystem, many of these things wanted to install their own toolbar (hmm, not python or ghc :) and whatever other cruft someone thinks is essential.
This isn't a problem with windows 7, but rather with the windows mindset, which is that the user is too stupid to know what to do, so someone else should decide - and then make it hard to change.
Yahoo messenger though had some problems - when a chat window opened it opened almost maximized (didn't fill the screen, but had no title bar and the top part of the window was off screen) - it took some time to figure out that if I resized the window, it would snap back to normal.
But I needed to do that with every chat window that opened.
This was not happening on Vista or XP.
IE wants to have Bing as your default search provider and makes it hard to change.
I changed this twice to Google (which took some doing) and then the machine would reboot and it would be Bing again.
No wonder Bing usage is increasing.
Firefox got stuck in "safemode" and it took some work to find out how to unset that - had to restart firefox, not from the "recently used items" menu, but from the disk copy.
Why it was in "safemode" in the first place, I really do not know.
The window decorations and menubars are way too big (on my relatively small screen - 1440x900) and take up way too much vertical space - handling multiple windows at once is almost impossible and the taskbar thingummy doesn't really help much - and the system doesn't want me to use a font any smaller than I'm currently using.
The taskbar is too wide and you can't change it, but autohiding helps some.
The icons on my desktop are too big and there seems to be no way to change that either.
There's a cute analog clock which I rather like, but it is huge and won't get any smaller, nor can you move it right up into a corner - it snaps back to the middle of the screen.
When some notification windows are active (including the "change search provider" one which was quite slow), it was impossible to move or resize the parent window - very annoying.
I had to go to websites and get drivers to install (most of which required reboots) and in several cases was told that there are no drivers for that device for win7.
The system seems to run ok - not fast, but acceptable on this hardware (not the best in the world).
If you have any number of windows open, things get slow quickly though - changing windows or applications has a perceptible lag (when more than just a few things are running).
I'm sure that some of these problems will be fixed - drivers will become available quickly enough and I'll probably find workarounds for others, or some nice person will tell me "thats easy, just do this...",  but some of them are just "the user is stupid, don't let the user do things we (microsoft, yahoo...) don't want them to do".
Sadly enough, this attitude is becoming more prevalent in linux as well, but has a long, long way to go before it reaches the level of contempt shown in the windows world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835599</id>
	<title>... and the media blitz for Windows 7 begins</title>
	<author>QuietLagoon</author>
	<datestamp>1256228280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... I am surprised that Ars Technica fell for being Microsoft's tool.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... I am surprised that Ars Technica fell for being Microsoft 's tool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... I am surprised that Ars Technica fell for being Microsoft's tool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905</id>
	<title>Whoever proposed a bigger memory footprint than XP</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256225160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is not an engineer. Windows 7 requires lots more RAM than XP and is slower than XP on the same hardware. That doesn't speak highly about those who engineered Windows 7.</p><p>In every other field, progress mans efficiency, not more bloat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is not an engineer .
Windows 7 requires lots more RAM than XP and is slower than XP on the same hardware .
That does n't speak highly about those who engineered Windows 7.In every other field , progress mans efficiency , not more bloat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is not an engineer.
Windows 7 requires lots more RAM than XP and is slower than XP on the same hardware.
That doesn't speak highly about those who engineered Windows 7.In every other field, progress mans efficiency, not more bloat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835321</id>
	<title>Window's Explorer...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can I just have a 64-bit windows operating system that will keep up with the latest graphics drivers. And bring back classic XP Window's Explorer... I hate Vista's Explorer with a passion. If you change something, make a classic version!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I just have a 64-bit windows operating system that will keep up with the latest graphics drivers .
And bring back classic XP Window 's Explorer... I hate Vista 's Explorer with a passion .
If you change something , make a classic version !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I just have a 64-bit windows operating system that will keep up with the latest graphics drivers.
And bring back classic XP Window's Explorer... I hate Vista's Explorer with a passion.
If you change something, make a classic version!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839543</id>
	<title>Re:Window's Explorer...</title>
	<author>nuckfuts</author>
	<datestamp>1256202780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd be content with an "up-folder" icon. It drove me mad until I learned to type Alt-UpArrow.</p><p>I'd also love a "classic" search function. I don't want or need an index service running all the time, and there are too many hoops to jump through to search in non-indexed locations. On the odd occasion I need to search my entire drive for something, I can live with a little wait.</p><p>As for the new taskbar behaviour, I thought the Vista taskbar with Quick Launch toolbar was just fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be content with an " up-folder " icon .
It drove me mad until I learned to type Alt-UpArrow.I 'd also love a " classic " search function .
I do n't want or need an index service running all the time , and there are too many hoops to jump through to search in non-indexed locations .
On the odd occasion I need to search my entire drive for something , I can live with a little wait.As for the new taskbar behaviour , I thought the Vista taskbar with Quick Launch toolbar was just fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd be content with an "up-folder" icon.
It drove me mad until I learned to type Alt-UpArrow.I'd also love a "classic" search function.
I don't want or need an index service running all the time, and there are too many hoops to jump through to search in non-indexed locations.
On the odd occasion I need to search my entire drive for something, I can live with a little wait.As for the new taskbar behaviour, I thought the Vista taskbar with Quick Launch toolbar was just fine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835321</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836891</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256233860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>HA HA HA HA!  Talk about un-l337!  Dude (or dudette), I have the same setup, slightly slower and Vista runs fine for me.  Of course, I had to back off the bells and whistles a bit.  There are many sites out there that show you how to tune Vista.</p><p>I hope you don't think you can put random specs in a computer and expect it to run X full blast.  If so, I bet you were similarly bummed out when Crysis came out.  Best I remember, 95\% of the computers couldn't max that game when it arrived.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>HA HA HA HA !
Talk about un-l337 !
Dude ( or dudette ) , I have the same setup , slightly slower and Vista runs fine for me .
Of course , I had to back off the bells and whistles a bit .
There are many sites out there that show you how to tune Vista.I hope you do n't think you can put random specs in a computer and expect it to run X full blast .
If so , I bet you were similarly bummed out when Crysis came out .
Best I remember , 95 \ % of the computers could n't max that game when it arrived .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HA HA HA HA!
Talk about un-l337!
Dude (or dudette), I have the same setup, slightly slower and Vista runs fine for me.
Of course, I had to back off the bells and whistles a bit.
There are many sites out there that show you how to tune Vista.I hope you don't think you can put random specs in a computer and expect it to run X full blast.
If so, I bet you were similarly bummed out when Crysis came out.
Best I remember, 95\% of the computers couldn't max that game when it arrived.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835449</id>
	<title>Re:An F-15 is much bigger than a P-51. OMG BLOAT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But why the fuck would i install a new OS on old ass hardware? Masochism? It's a cute experiment, but useless as a means to judge how a current OS will run on CURRENT hardware.</p></div><p>You should really go easy on slinging obscenities around like that, it makes you look silly. Installing a new OS on old hardware is a reasonable thing to do and so is judging Windows 7 performance on older hardware. Amazingly enough not everybody is willing to shell out money for a new computer every time there is an OS update. I went through four major OS revisions on my first Mac without ever feeling a performance drop. I know people who upgraded from OS 9 to OS X on old G3 boxes and most of them had no complaints other than than they decided to upgrade their RAM but that wasn't exactly a financially ruinous experience. According to our local Microsoft Rep Windows 7 will "Rejuvenate older machines and make them last longer because you will rediscover performance you thought you had lost" (that sentence loses some of it's marketing cool-aid flavor in translation). Anecdotal evidence seems to indicate neither that poster nor the Microsoft rep are 100\% right or wrong, I know a number of people who upgraded old boxes to Windows 7, none of them are complaining but most of them also upgraded their RAM and a few bought a new HD which sounds about the same as the experience my friends had when upgrading from OS 9 to OS X on their G3 boxes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But why the fuck would i install a new OS on old ass hardware ?
Masochism ? It 's a cute experiment , but useless as a means to judge how a current OS will run on CURRENT hardware.You should really go easy on slinging obscenities around like that , it makes you look silly .
Installing a new OS on old hardware is a reasonable thing to do and so is judging Windows 7 performance on older hardware .
Amazingly enough not everybody is willing to shell out money for a new computer every time there is an OS update .
I went through four major OS revisions on my first Mac without ever feeling a performance drop .
I know people who upgraded from OS 9 to OS X on old G3 boxes and most of them had no complaints other than than they decided to upgrade their RAM but that was n't exactly a financially ruinous experience .
According to our local Microsoft Rep Windows 7 will " Rejuvenate older machines and make them last longer because you will rediscover performance you thought you had lost " ( that sentence loses some of it 's marketing cool-aid flavor in translation ) .
Anecdotal evidence seems to indicate neither that poster nor the Microsoft rep are 100 \ % right or wrong , I know a number of people who upgraded old boxes to Windows 7 , none of them are complaining but most of them also upgraded their RAM and a few bought a new HD which sounds about the same as the experience my friends had when upgrading from OS 9 to OS X on their G3 boxes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But why the fuck would i install a new OS on old ass hardware?
Masochism? It's a cute experiment, but useless as a means to judge how a current OS will run on CURRENT hardware.You should really go easy on slinging obscenities around like that, it makes you look silly.
Installing a new OS on old hardware is a reasonable thing to do and so is judging Windows 7 performance on older hardware.
Amazingly enough not everybody is willing to shell out money for a new computer every time there is an OS update.
I went through four major OS revisions on my first Mac without ever feeling a performance drop.
I know people who upgraded from OS 9 to OS X on old G3 boxes and most of them had no complaints other than than they decided to upgrade their RAM but that wasn't exactly a financially ruinous experience.
According to our local Microsoft Rep Windows 7 will "Rejuvenate older machines and make them last longer because you will rediscover performance you thought you had lost" (that sentence loses some of it's marketing cool-aid flavor in translation).
Anecdotal evidence seems to indicate neither that poster nor the Microsoft rep are 100\% right or wrong, I know a number of people who upgraded old boxes to Windows 7, none of them are complaining but most of them also upgraded their RAM and a few bought a new HD which sounds about the same as the experience my friends had when upgrading from OS 9 to OS X on their G3 boxes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836165</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>ZarathustraDK</author>
	<datestamp>1256230680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Woah, Desperate Guy is Desperate!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Woah , Desperate Guy is Desperate !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Woah, Desperate Guy is Desperate!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836381</id>
	<title>There are full-size cars and compact cars.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256231820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You're ignoring that computers have more RAM available.</p></div><p>And you're ignoring that computers come in a wider variety of form factors and price ranges than just mid-to-high-end desktops. How comfortably would Windows 7 run on even a <em>one</em> year old netbook with a 900 MHz Celeron, half a GB of RAM, and a 4 GB SSD?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're ignoring that computers have more RAM available.And you 're ignoring that computers come in a wider variety of form factors and price ranges than just mid-to-high-end desktops .
How comfortably would Windows 7 run on even a one year old netbook with a 900 MHz Celeron , half a GB of RAM , and a 4 GB SSD ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're ignoring that computers have more RAM available.And you're ignoring that computers come in a wider variety of form factors and price ranges than just mid-to-high-end desktops.
How comfortably would Windows 7 run on even a one year old netbook with a 900 MHz Celeron, half a GB of RAM, and a 4 GB SSD?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835345</id>
	<title>Windows 7 audience...</title>
	<author>fahrbot-bot</author>
	<datestamp>1256227320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps this is a bit of a troll, but it comes from frustration using the products...
<p>
I notice in TFA that the photo is of, what looks to be, a fifth grade classroom.  Is this the target audience for Windows 7?  I mean the commercials - er commercial - seems to be of that seven-year-old girl making a pink-pony presentation.
</p><p>
I'm confused. Is Windows 7 and Office 2007 -- which I hate, by the way (shakes fist) curse you "ribbon"! -- suppose to be so simple a seven-year-old can use it, or so simple that only a seven-year-old can use it.
</p><p>
I guess Microsoft is trying to hook them when they're young...sigh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps this is a bit of a troll , but it comes from frustration using the products.. . I notice in TFA that the photo is of , what looks to be , a fifth grade classroom .
Is this the target audience for Windows 7 ?
I mean the commercials - er commercial - seems to be of that seven-year-old girl making a pink-pony presentation .
I 'm confused .
Is Windows 7 and Office 2007 -- which I hate , by the way ( shakes fist ) curse you " ribbon " !
-- suppose to be so simple a seven-year-old can use it , or so simple that only a seven-year-old can use it .
I guess Microsoft is trying to hook them when they 're young...sigh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps this is a bit of a troll, but it comes from frustration using the products...

I notice in TFA that the photo is of, what looks to be, a fifth grade classroom.
Is this the target audience for Windows 7?
I mean the commercials - er commercial - seems to be of that seven-year-old girl making a pink-pony presentation.
I'm confused.
Is Windows 7 and Office 2007 -- which I hate, by the way (shakes fist) curse you "ribbon"!
-- suppose to be so simple a seven-year-old can use it, or so simple that only a seven-year-old can use it.
I guess Microsoft is trying to hook them when they're young...sigh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844479</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>nimid</author>
	<datestamp>1256302740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Very well written but was I the only one that was beginning to feel uncomfortable towards the end?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Very well written but was I the only one that was beginning to feel uncomfortable towards the end ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very well written but was I the only one that was beginning to feel uncomfortable towards the end?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097</id>
	<title>An F-15 is much bigger than a P-51. OMG BLOAT!</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1256226120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're ignoring that computers have more RAM available.  My 5 year old machine is maxed at 4GB.  The machine i'll build for 7 will likely START at 4GB.  Did you miss the trend about computers having ever faster CPUs and more RAM and storage?  How did that escape your notice as a member of Slashdot?</p><p>You're also ignoring that 7 will have more features than XP.  Word is bigger than Notepad.  Therefore Word is teh b10@3d!!! OMG!1!  Bigger doesn't necessarily mean bloated.  There might be some bloat, sure. But NEW FEATURES ADD TO THE SIZE OF SOFTWARE.</p><p>A bigger OS runs slower than a smaller OS on the same hardware? WOW.  Thanks Capt. Obvious!  While you're here, could you tell us if this water is wet?  But why the fuck would i install a new OS on old ass hardware?  Masochism?  It's a cute experiment, but useless as a means to judge how a current OS will run on CURRENT hardware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're ignoring that computers have more RAM available .
My 5 year old machine is maxed at 4GB .
The machine i 'll build for 7 will likely START at 4GB .
Did you miss the trend about computers having ever faster CPUs and more RAM and storage ?
How did that escape your notice as a member of Slashdot ? You 're also ignoring that 7 will have more features than XP .
Word is bigger than Notepad .
Therefore Word is teh b10 @ 3d ! ! !
OMG ! 1 ! Bigger does n't necessarily mean bloated .
There might be some bloat , sure .
But NEW FEATURES ADD TO THE SIZE OF SOFTWARE.A bigger OS runs slower than a smaller OS on the same hardware ?
WOW. Thanks Capt .
Obvious ! While you 're here , could you tell us if this water is wet ?
But why the fuck would i install a new OS on old ass hardware ?
Masochism ? It 's a cute experiment , but useless as a means to judge how a current OS will run on CURRENT hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're ignoring that computers have more RAM available.
My 5 year old machine is maxed at 4GB.
The machine i'll build for 7 will likely START at 4GB.
Did you miss the trend about computers having ever faster CPUs and more RAM and storage?
How did that escape your notice as a member of Slashdot?You're also ignoring that 7 will have more features than XP.
Word is bigger than Notepad.
Therefore Word is teh b10@3d!!!
OMG!1!  Bigger doesn't necessarily mean bloated.
There might be some bloat, sure.
But NEW FEATURES ADD TO THE SIZE OF SOFTWARE.A bigger OS runs slower than a smaller OS on the same hardware?
WOW.  Thanks Capt.
Obvious!  While you're here, could you tell us if this water is wet?
But why the fuck would i install a new OS on old ass hardware?
Masochism?  It's a cute experiment, but useless as a means to judge how a current OS will run on CURRENT hardware.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840969</id>
	<title>Re:Dear God...</title>
	<author>hofmny</author>
	<datestamp>1256210880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Developers, Developers, Developers!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Developers , Developers , Developers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Developers, Developers, Developers!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844825</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>left00coaster</author>
	<datestamp>1256305440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thank you, tenzig, for crafting this extraordinarily funny, stunningly accurate, analogy. I read your post aloud to my wife, and we're still laughing . . .</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you , tenzig , for crafting this extraordinarily funny , stunningly accurate , analogy .
I read your post aloud to my wife , and we 're still laughing .
. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you, tenzig, for crafting this extraordinarily funny, stunningly accurate, analogy.
I read your post aloud to my wife, and we're still laughing .
. .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837507</id>
	<title>All this bashing of W7 makes me want to try it</title>
	<author>fhuglegads</author>
	<datestamp>1256236440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm honestly getting more and more interested in this release simply because of all the negative noise.

My experience with Vista was minimal. I hated it. My friend was running it on a system with 2GB of RAM. 1 stick failed and I removed it. I then installed XP and he commented on how much faster his system was.

I don't know what to think. Now all I need is M$ to send me a free copy because that's about all it's worth to me. I'd be willing to give it a fair review.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm honestly getting more and more interested in this release simply because of all the negative noise .
My experience with Vista was minimal .
I hated it .
My friend was running it on a system with 2GB of RAM .
1 stick failed and I removed it .
I then installed XP and he commented on how much faster his system was .
I do n't know what to think .
Now all I need is M $ to send me a free copy because that 's about all it 's worth to me .
I 'd be willing to give it a fair review .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm honestly getting more and more interested in this release simply because of all the negative noise.
My experience with Vista was minimal.
I hated it.
My friend was running it on a system with 2GB of RAM.
1 stick failed and I removed it.
I then installed XP and he commented on how much faster his system was.
I don't know what to think.
Now all I need is M$ to send me a free copy because that's about all it's worth to me.
I'd be willing to give it a fair review.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835161</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256226420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My father recently bought a budget Toshiba Satellite (Core 2 Duo 2.8GHz &amp; 4GB RAM), and between Vista, the junky Norton security suite and all the other Toshiba crapware its performance was about that of my budget XP netbook when it was running of disk space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My father recently bought a budget Toshiba Satellite ( Core 2 Duo 2.8GHz &amp; 4GB RAM ) , and between Vista , the junky Norton security suite and all the other Toshiba crapware its performance was about that of my budget XP netbook when it was running of disk space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My father recently bought a budget Toshiba Satellite (Core 2 Duo 2.8GHz &amp; 4GB RAM), and between Vista, the junky Norton security suite and all the other Toshiba crapware its performance was about that of my budget XP netbook when it was running of disk space.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837905</id>
	<title>You forgot about OSX people</title>
	<author>ub3r n3u7r4l1st</author>
	<datestamp>1256237820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most of the apple users I knew were very impressed about the Win 7 commercials.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of the apple users I knew were very impressed about the Win 7 commercials .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of the apple users I knew were very impressed about the Win 7 commercials.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835841</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>b4dc0d3r</author>
	<datestamp>1256229360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's nothing left to say, I'm going to simply link to this comment in every discussion about W7.  Spot-on, and if I could buy you a pint I would.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's nothing left to say , I 'm going to simply link to this comment in every discussion about W7 .
Spot-on , and if I could buy you a pint I would .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's nothing left to say, I'm going to simply link to this comment in every discussion about W7.
Spot-on, and if I could buy you a pint I would.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29845403</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256309340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How many people trying to install an o/s even have an ex.</p><p>Typical crappy piece written by a geek with nothing other than time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many people trying to install an o/s even have an ex.Typical crappy piece written by a geek with nothing other than time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many people trying to install an o/s even have an ex.Typical crappy piece written by a geek with nothing other than time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838887</id>
	<title>Vista's Homepage</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256242560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dunno if anyone tried, but when you google vista, the first non news result is M$'s vista page, and everything said 7 on it.<br>If you google XP, it will take you to a XP homepage.  Apparently vista is so bad, even M$ can't wait to get rid of it.  Maybe I am easily amuse, I got a good laugh on that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dunno if anyone tried , but when you google vista , the first non news result is M $ 's vista page , and everything said 7 on it.If you google XP , it will take you to a XP homepage .
Apparently vista is so bad , even M $ ca n't wait to get rid of it .
Maybe I am easily amuse , I got a good laugh on that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dunno if anyone tried, but when you google vista, the first non news result is M$'s vista page, and everything said 7 on it.If you google XP, it will take you to a XP homepage.
Apparently vista is so bad, even M$ can't wait to get rid of it.
Maybe I am easily amuse, I got a good laugh on that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29854087</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256316600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...sounds like my ex-husband, just stated in the other gender...geez...so true...so true...lol...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...sounds like my ex-husband , just stated in the other gender...geez...so true...so true...lol.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...sounds like my ex-husband, just stated in the other gender...geez...so true...so true...lol...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835865</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256229480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Had me up until "is a lot like seeing an old girlfriend " and I lost any sense of reference of what you're talking about.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Had me up until " is a lot like seeing an old girlfriend " and I lost any sense of reference of what you 're talking about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Had me up until "is a lot like seeing an old girlfriend " and I lost any sense of reference of what you're talking about.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171</id>
	<title>Dear God...</title>
	<author>X.25</author>
	<datestamp>1256226480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Windows 7 is another proof that enough marketing can make something good.</p><p>Windows 7, Windows 7, Windows 7,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>I yet have to find someone who can show me what it brings me, over XP, that is worth paying 100+ EUR for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Windows 7 is another proof that enough marketing can make something good.Windows 7 , Windows 7 , Windows 7 , ...I yet have to find someone who can show me what it brings me , over XP , that is worth paying 100 + EUR for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Windows 7 is another proof that enough marketing can make something good.Windows 7, Windows 7, Windows 7, ...I yet have to find someone who can show me what it brings me, over XP, that is worth paying 100+ EUR for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835729</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>jonbryce</author>
	<datestamp>1256228760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They sorted that problem out about 10 years ago when Windows 2000 shipped.  Security is what they need to fix now.  It is a lot better now than in the days of XP SP1, but still not good enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They sorted that problem out about 10 years ago when Windows 2000 shipped .
Security is what they need to fix now .
It is a lot better now than in the days of XP SP1 , but still not good enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They sorted that problem out about 10 years ago when Windows 2000 shipped.
Security is what they need to fix now.
It is a lot better now than in the days of XP SP1, but still not good enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834775</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29847967</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256321820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seeded by Apple, gj!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seeded by Apple , gj !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seeded by Apple, gj!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836729</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>Nursie</author>
	<datestamp>1256233260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess that a lot of the slash geeks (self included) have migrated to linux full time now. Compared to debian lenny, vista is slow as hell, takes forever to update, is prone to locking up once in a while and takes an eternity to start up.</p><p>Haven't tried 7 yet, don't really care to. The only reason I have vista is that it came with this machine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess that a lot of the slash geeks ( self included ) have migrated to linux full time now .
Compared to debian lenny , vista is slow as hell , takes forever to update , is prone to locking up once in a while and takes an eternity to start up.Have n't tried 7 yet , do n't really care to .
The only reason I have vista is that it came with this machine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess that a lot of the slash geeks (self included) have migrated to linux full time now.
Compared to debian lenny, vista is slow as hell, takes forever to update, is prone to locking up once in a while and takes an eternity to start up.Haven't tried 7 yet, don't really care to.
The only reason I have vista is that it came with this machine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29843793</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256292960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wish I had mod points and you weren't already maxed out right now. Well done!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wish I had mod points and you were n't already maxed out right now .
Well done !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wish I had mod points and you weren't already maxed out right now.
Well done!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835557</id>
	<title>Re:An F-15 is much bigger than a P-51. OMG BLOAT!</title>
	<author>Again</author>
	<datestamp>1256228160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You're ignoring that computers have more RAM available.  My 5 year old machine is maxed at 4GB.  The machine i'll build for 7 will likely START at 4GB.  Did you miss the trend about computers having ever faster CPUs and more RAM and storage?  How did that escape your notice as a member of Slashdot?</p></div><p>My head's in the sand dude.  I don't hear much down here.  Also, I'm a student who lives on old computers.  Life's tough.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>You're also ignoring that 7 will have more features than XP.  Word is bigger than Notepad.  Therefore Word is teh b10@3d!!! OMG!1!  Bigger doesn't necessarily mean bloated.  There might be some bloat, sure. But NEW FEATURES ADD TO THE SIZE OF SOFTWARE.</p></div><p>Thanks for finally saying something that I could hear.  Head stuck in sand cuts out most people's voices but yours finally transcended the threshold necessary for me to hear.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're ignoring that computers have more RAM available .
My 5 year old machine is maxed at 4GB .
The machine i 'll build for 7 will likely START at 4GB .
Did you miss the trend about computers having ever faster CPUs and more RAM and storage ?
How did that escape your notice as a member of Slashdot ? My head 's in the sand dude .
I do n't hear much down here .
Also , I 'm a student who lives on old computers .
Life 's tough.You 're also ignoring that 7 will have more features than XP .
Word is bigger than Notepad .
Therefore Word is teh b10 @ 3d ! ! !
OMG ! 1 ! Bigger does n't necessarily mean bloated .
There might be some bloat , sure .
But NEW FEATURES ADD TO THE SIZE OF SOFTWARE.Thanks for finally saying something that I could hear .
Head stuck in sand cuts out most people 's voices but yours finally transcended the threshold necessary for me to hear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're ignoring that computers have more RAM available.
My 5 year old machine is maxed at 4GB.
The machine i'll build for 7 will likely START at 4GB.
Did you miss the trend about computers having ever faster CPUs and more RAM and storage?
How did that escape your notice as a member of Slashdot?My head's in the sand dude.
I don't hear much down here.
Also, I'm a student who lives on old computers.
Life's tough.You're also ignoring that 7 will have more features than XP.
Word is bigger than Notepad.
Therefore Word is teh b10@3d!!!
OMG!1!  Bigger doesn't necessarily mean bloated.
There might be some bloat, sure.
But NEW FEATURES ADD TO THE SIZE OF SOFTWARE.Thanks for finally saying something that I could hear.
Head stuck in sand cuts out most people's voices but yours finally transcended the threshold necessary for me to hear.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837653</id>
	<title>Re:Dear God...</title>
	<author>AaronW</author>
	<datestamp>1256236980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I recently switched my HP Mini netbook from XP to the 7 RC.<br>I have found that some things are just more stable. Hibernate, for example, seems to work a lot better and works faster. It's much improved over XP. It's definitely been more stable and it's a number of little things I notice that are improvements, besides the improved task bar.</p><p>Memory wise, Windows 7 Ultimate it doesn't seem to use much more than what I was using with XP Home. If anything, the memory management feels like its improved quite a bit.</p><p>A lot of the little things in XP that bugged me seem to be fixed. Wireless and networking now always work when coming out of hibernate.</p><p>The only thing that bothers me is that I can no longer initiate a drive self test using the smartmontools.</p><p>Now I can't compare to Vista, since I've never run it. My primary OS is Linux.</p><p>That's not to say it isn't without its warts. Installing my printer (an HP Laserjet 4M Plus) requires 15 minutes of waiting to get the list of printer drivers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I recently switched my HP Mini netbook from XP to the 7 RC.I have found that some things are just more stable .
Hibernate , for example , seems to work a lot better and works faster .
It 's much improved over XP .
It 's definitely been more stable and it 's a number of little things I notice that are improvements , besides the improved task bar.Memory wise , Windows 7 Ultimate it does n't seem to use much more than what I was using with XP Home .
If anything , the memory management feels like its improved quite a bit.A lot of the little things in XP that bugged me seem to be fixed .
Wireless and networking now always work when coming out of hibernate.The only thing that bothers me is that I can no longer initiate a drive self test using the smartmontools.Now I ca n't compare to Vista , since I 've never run it .
My primary OS is Linux.That 's not to say it is n't without its warts .
Installing my printer ( an HP Laserjet 4M Plus ) requires 15 minutes of waiting to get the list of printer drivers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I recently switched my HP Mini netbook from XP to the 7 RC.I have found that some things are just more stable.
Hibernate, for example, seems to work a lot better and works faster.
It's much improved over XP.
It's definitely been more stable and it's a number of little things I notice that are improvements, besides the improved task bar.Memory wise, Windows 7 Ultimate it doesn't seem to use much more than what I was using with XP Home.
If anything, the memory management feels like its improved quite a bit.A lot of the little things in XP that bugged me seem to be fixed.
Wireless and networking now always work when coming out of hibernate.The only thing that bothers me is that I can no longer initiate a drive self test using the smartmontools.Now I can't compare to Vista, since I've never run it.
My primary OS is Linux.That's not to say it isn't without its warts.
Installing my printer (an HP Laserjet 4M Plus) requires 15 minutes of waiting to get the list of printer drivers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840559</id>
	<title>Re:Is there anything GOOD in windows 7....</title>
	<author>cbhacking</author>
	<datestamp>1256208240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ignoring the for mement that some companies and even government organizations did switch to Vista, one good reason to go with Win7 is BitLocker, especially the ability to encrypt flashdrives and other removable storage. No more risk of sensitive electronic documents being stolen out of your car or embarrassing information leaks via discarded hard drives.</p><p>Additionally, Win7 is extremely usable as a standard user (including things like changing your permanent environment variables, or installing printer drivers off the network, which previously required Admin access). The vast majority of people will have no need for Administrator access, meaning it's much harder for them to screw up their systems. Furthermore, if IT needs to do something anyhow, it's much easier for an authorized Admin (such as somebody in IT) to gain Administrative privileges thanks to UAC. There's also lots of other nice things for IT, such as new or improved Group Policy options, and substantially better OS security in general.</p><p>Finally, if something simply *will not* work on anything newer than XP, there's always Virtual XP mode, which streamlines virtualization and is available at no extra cost with the business-targeted Win7 editions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ignoring the for mement that some companies and even government organizations did switch to Vista , one good reason to go with Win7 is BitLocker , especially the ability to encrypt flashdrives and other removable storage .
No more risk of sensitive electronic documents being stolen out of your car or embarrassing information leaks via discarded hard drives.Additionally , Win7 is extremely usable as a standard user ( including things like changing your permanent environment variables , or installing printer drivers off the network , which previously required Admin access ) .
The vast majority of people will have no need for Administrator access , meaning it 's much harder for them to screw up their systems .
Furthermore , if IT needs to do something anyhow , it 's much easier for an authorized Admin ( such as somebody in IT ) to gain Administrative privileges thanks to UAC .
There 's also lots of other nice things for IT , such as new or improved Group Policy options , and substantially better OS security in general.Finally , if something simply * will not * work on anything newer than XP , there 's always Virtual XP mode , which streamlines virtualization and is available at no extra cost with the business-targeted Win7 editions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ignoring the for mement that some companies and even government organizations did switch to Vista, one good reason to go with Win7 is BitLocker, especially the ability to encrypt flashdrives and other removable storage.
No more risk of sensitive electronic documents being stolen out of your car or embarrassing information leaks via discarded hard drives.Additionally, Win7 is extremely usable as a standard user (including things like changing your permanent environment variables, or installing printer drivers off the network, which previously required Admin access).
The vast majority of people will have no need for Administrator access, meaning it's much harder for them to screw up their systems.
Furthermore, if IT needs to do something anyhow, it's much easier for an authorized Admin (such as somebody in IT) to gain Administrative privileges thanks to UAC.
There's also lots of other nice things for IT, such as new or improved Group Policy options, and substantially better OS security in general.Finally, if something simply *will not* work on anything newer than XP, there's always Virtual XP mode, which streamlines virtualization and is available at no extra cost with the business-targeted Win7 editions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835847</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835203</id>
	<title>Re:An F-15 is much bigger than a P-51. OMG BLOAT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256226780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>You're also ignoring that 7 will have more features than XP. Word is bigger than Notepad. Therefore Word is teh b10@3d!!! OMG!1! Bigger doesn't necessarily mean bloated. There might be some bloat, sure. But NEW FEATURES ADD TO THE SIZE OF SOFTWARE.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
I've had to use a pre-release version of Windows 7 at work, for testing.
</p><p>
From my perspective, as a user, I haven't come across anything  new Windows 7.  What they have done is rearrange and hide everything for no good reason, and made it run slower than Vista or XP on the same machine.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're also ignoring that 7 will have more features than XP .
Word is bigger than Notepad .
Therefore Word is teh b10 @ 3d ! ! !
OMG ! 1 ! Bigger does n't necessarily mean bloated .
There might be some bloat , sure .
But NEW FEATURES ADD TO THE SIZE OF SOFTWARE .
I 've had to use a pre-release version of Windows 7 at work , for testing .
From my perspective , as a user , I have n't come across anything new Windows 7 .
What they have done is rearrange and hide everything for no good reason , and made it run slower than Vista or XP on the same machine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're also ignoring that 7 will have more features than XP.
Word is bigger than Notepad.
Therefore Word is teh b10@3d!!!
OMG!1! Bigger doesn't necessarily mean bloated.
There might be some bloat, sure.
But NEW FEATURES ADD TO THE SIZE OF SOFTWARE.
I've had to use a pre-release version of Windows 7 at work, for testing.
From my perspective, as a user, I haven't come across anything  new Windows 7.
What they have done is rearrange and hide everything for no good reason, and made it run slower than Vista or XP on the same machine.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835739</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>coolmoose25</author>
	<datestamp>1256228820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wish I had mod points and that the parent wasn't already at +5...  Wow.  Just Wow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish I had mod points and that the parent was n't already at + 5... Wow. Just Wow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish I had mod points and that the parent wasn't already at +5...  Wow.  Just Wow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836031</id>
	<title>Re:I can see it now</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1256230080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ehhh... they did fix some fairly serious design errors in Vista (mostly the GDI concurrency and network latency bullshit). I still hate the DRM and the fact that Microsoft thinks it's more their computer than mine, but for a gaming machine, Win7 ain't half bad and since XP will never get DX10 or 11, I'm gonna go with 7 over Vista.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ehhh... they did fix some fairly serious design errors in Vista ( mostly the GDI concurrency and network latency bullshit ) .
I still hate the DRM and the fact that Microsoft thinks it 's more their computer than mine , but for a gaming machine , Win7 ai n't half bad and since XP will never get DX10 or 11 , I 'm gon na go with 7 over Vista .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ehhh... they did fix some fairly serious design errors in Vista (mostly the GDI concurrency and network latency bullshit).
I still hate the DRM and the fact that Microsoft thinks it's more their computer than mine, but for a gaming machine, Win7 ain't half bad and since XP will never get DX10 or 11, I'm gonna go with 7 over Vista.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834797</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839859</id>
	<title>Re:Lack of feedback</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256204460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you can if you pay to have them look at your bug!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you can if you pay to have them look at your bug !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you can if you pay to have them look at your bug!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835485</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836059</id>
	<title>I want Windows 7</title>
	<author>mrwolf007</author>
	<datestamp>1256230260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>.. of nine.</htmltext>
<tokenext>.. of nine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. of nine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834967</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256225460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would you consider a laptop with a core 2 duo 1.8ghz with 1GB of ram underpowered?</p><p>Because Vista is unusable on that hardware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would you consider a laptop with a core 2 duo 1.8ghz with 1GB of ram underpowered ? Because Vista is unusable on that hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would you consider a laptop with a core 2 duo 1.8ghz with 1GB of ram underpowered?Because Vista is unusable on that hardware.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837289</id>
	<title>Why Upgrade?</title>
	<author>pandrijeczko</author>
	<datestamp>1256235540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Okay, maybe Windows 7 will be the best OS that MS have ever released - but that will be proven or disproven over the next few weeks or months, but what's the reason to upgrade now?</p><p>My XP desktop is working hunky dory at the moment and with months of trouble-free service, it's blue-screened a couple of times after I installed iTunes on it the first time due to my missus giving me her iPod Touch after she upgraded. Still, the Touch is a neat little gadget, I buy my own CDs and rip them so I don't need the Apple Store that much - no biggie.</p><p>My PCs are fast enough, I have a couple of Linux boxes and a couple of XP boxes for gaming, I'm a happy chappie with all my computing needs fulfilled.</p><p>So here's my view on what Windows 7 will give me:</p><p>1. A version of DirectX greater than 9 - I don't MMORPG, I play Fallout 3, S.T.A.L.K.E.R., Left 4 Dead, the Half-Life's and a few others. No PC games title in the past few months has made me want to buy it and I'm not expecting that to change anytime soon. The games I do play run nice and prettily on my trusty nVidia 8800GTS graphics card and 1680x1050 monitor. No, I don't feel I need even more pixels to look at, or indeed that the existing ones need to be any prettier.</p><p>2. Eye candy - well, I'm sure there are Windows people out there suffering penis envy whilst looking over the shoulders of some OS X users but, in my case, my desktop looks the way ***I want it***, not how ***I want others to see it.*** I have a clock in the corner of a Windows Classic desktop, a few apps telling me things in the taskbar and a few more addons in Firefox telling me when there's a new email, what the weather outside is and what the &pound; to  exchange rate is. I'm sure there's all kind of animated dockicons I can plaster on a Vista or Windows 7 desktop that look nice but just tell me the same information whilst burning more CPU cycles. Big deal...</p><p>Sure, I'm mostly Linux guy but Linux doesn't do everything I need an OS to do and XP plugs those gaps pretty well - but I am wondering what all the fuss is about and if I'm missing something because, good OS or bad OS, I cannot see a reason to upgrade to Windows 7.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , maybe Windows 7 will be the best OS that MS have ever released - but that will be proven or disproven over the next few weeks or months , but what 's the reason to upgrade now ? My XP desktop is working hunky dory at the moment and with months of trouble-free service , it 's blue-screened a couple of times after I installed iTunes on it the first time due to my missus giving me her iPod Touch after she upgraded .
Still , the Touch is a neat little gadget , I buy my own CDs and rip them so I do n't need the Apple Store that much - no biggie.My PCs are fast enough , I have a couple of Linux boxes and a couple of XP boxes for gaming , I 'm a happy chappie with all my computing needs fulfilled.So here 's my view on what Windows 7 will give me : 1 .
A version of DirectX greater than 9 - I do n't MMORPG , I play Fallout 3 , S.T.A.L.K.E.R. , Left 4 Dead , the Half-Life 's and a few others .
No PC games title in the past few months has made me want to buy it and I 'm not expecting that to change anytime soon .
The games I do play run nice and prettily on my trusty nVidia 8800GTS graphics card and 1680x1050 monitor .
No , I do n't feel I need even more pixels to look at , or indeed that the existing ones need to be any prettier.2 .
Eye candy - well , I 'm sure there are Windows people out there suffering penis envy whilst looking over the shoulders of some OS X users but , in my case , my desktop looks the way * * * I want it * * * , not how * * * I want others to see it .
* * * I have a clock in the corner of a Windows Classic desktop , a few apps telling me things in the taskbar and a few more addons in Firefox telling me when there 's a new email , what the weather outside is and what the   to exchange rate is .
I 'm sure there 's all kind of animated dockicons I can plaster on a Vista or Windows 7 desktop that look nice but just tell me the same information whilst burning more CPU cycles .
Big deal...Sure , I 'm mostly Linux guy but Linux does n't do everything I need an OS to do and XP plugs those gaps pretty well - but I am wondering what all the fuss is about and if I 'm missing something because , good OS or bad OS , I can not see a reason to upgrade to Windows 7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, maybe Windows 7 will be the best OS that MS have ever released - but that will be proven or disproven over the next few weeks or months, but what's the reason to upgrade now?My XP desktop is working hunky dory at the moment and with months of trouble-free service, it's blue-screened a couple of times after I installed iTunes on it the first time due to my missus giving me her iPod Touch after she upgraded.
Still, the Touch is a neat little gadget, I buy my own CDs and rip them so I don't need the Apple Store that much - no biggie.My PCs are fast enough, I have a couple of Linux boxes and a couple of XP boxes for gaming, I'm a happy chappie with all my computing needs fulfilled.So here's my view on what Windows 7 will give me:1.
A version of DirectX greater than 9 - I don't MMORPG, I play Fallout 3, S.T.A.L.K.E.R., Left 4 Dead, the Half-Life's and a few others.
No PC games title in the past few months has made me want to buy it and I'm not expecting that to change anytime soon.
The games I do play run nice and prettily on my trusty nVidia 8800GTS graphics card and 1680x1050 monitor.
No, I don't feel I need even more pixels to look at, or indeed that the existing ones need to be any prettier.2.
Eye candy - well, I'm sure there are Windows people out there suffering penis envy whilst looking over the shoulders of some OS X users but, in my case, my desktop looks the way ***I want it***, not how ***I want others to see it.
*** I have a clock in the corner of a Windows Classic desktop, a few apps telling me things in the taskbar and a few more addons in Firefox telling me when there's a new email, what the weather outside is and what the £ to  exchange rate is.
I'm sure there's all kind of animated dockicons I can plaster on a Vista or Windows 7 desktop that look nice but just tell me the same information whilst burning more CPU cycles.
Big deal...Sure, I'm mostly Linux guy but Linux doesn't do everything I need an OS to do and XP plugs those gaps pretty well - but I am wondering what all the fuss is about and if I'm missing something because, good OS or bad OS, I cannot see a reason to upgrade to Windows 7.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840397</id>
	<title>Re:Lack of feedback</title>
	<author>cbhacking</author>
	<datestamp>1256207400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft runs a large collection of newsgroups for discussion and feedback. I've seen MS employees, and those who have the ears of MS employees, on these boards. You may well be able to find others who have the same complaints that you do and get somebody to fix your issues. The web-based interface is accessible through <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/" title="microsoft.com">http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/</a> [microsoft.com], or you can use a newsreader program.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft runs a large collection of newsgroups for discussion and feedback .
I 've seen MS employees , and those who have the ears of MS employees , on these boards .
You may well be able to find others who have the same complaints that you do and get somebody to fix your issues .
The web-based interface is accessible through http : //www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/ [ microsoft.com ] , or you can use a newsreader program .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft runs a large collection of newsgroups for discussion and feedback.
I've seen MS employees, and those who have the ears of MS employees, on these boards.
You may well be able to find others who have the same complaints that you do and get somebody to fix your issues.
The web-based interface is accessible through http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/ [microsoft.com], or you can use a newsreader program.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835485</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835339</id>
	<title>Re:Whoever proposed a bigger memory footprint than</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>is not an engineer. Windows 7 requires lots more RAM than XP and is slower than XP on the same hardware. That doesn't speak highly about those who engineered Windows 7.</p><p>In every other field, progress mans efficiency, not more bloat.</p></div><p>I disagree entirely.  Win7 has a very similar memory requirement to XP.  In fact, I have a P4 with 640mb ram that actually runs 7 smoother than XP.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>is not an engineer .
Windows 7 requires lots more RAM than XP and is slower than XP on the same hardware .
That does n't speak highly about those who engineered Windows 7.In every other field , progress mans efficiency , not more bloat.I disagree entirely .
Win7 has a very similar memory requirement to XP .
In fact , I have a P4 with 640mb ram that actually runs 7 smoother than XP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is not an engineer.
Windows 7 requires lots more RAM than XP and is slower than XP on the same hardware.
That doesn't speak highly about those who engineered Windows 7.In every other field, progress mans efficiency, not more bloat.I disagree entirely.
Win7 has a very similar memory requirement to XP.
In fact, I have a P4 with 640mb ram that actually runs 7 smoother than XP.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836055</id>
	<title>Re:An F-15 is much bigger than a P-51. OMG BLOAT!</title>
	<author>ZarathustraDK</author>
	<datestamp>1256230200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You're also ignoring that 7 will have more features than XP. Word is bigger than Notepad. Therefore Word is teh b10@3d!!! OMG!1! Bigger doesn't necessarily mean bloated. There might be some bloat, sure. But NEW FEATURES ADD TO THE SIZE OF SOFTWARE.</p></div><p>You are ignoring the fact that an OS is simply a platform of running other apps on. The OS is not supposed to consume all the ram or even try to "push the boundaries" in the first place. RAM is for executing apps, multiple apps, perhaps a plethora of apps; ram-requiring processes of which the OS is only ONE. If the OS is a ram-hog, you're shit out of luck because it's the ONE PROCESS you're sure will be running alongside each and every time you launch an app.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're also ignoring that 7 will have more features than XP .
Word is bigger than Notepad .
Therefore Word is teh b10 @ 3d ! ! !
OMG ! 1 ! Bigger does n't necessarily mean bloated .
There might be some bloat , sure .
But NEW FEATURES ADD TO THE SIZE OF SOFTWARE.You are ignoring the fact that an OS is simply a platform of running other apps on .
The OS is not supposed to consume all the ram or even try to " push the boundaries " in the first place .
RAM is for executing apps , multiple apps , perhaps a plethora of apps ; ram-requiring processes of which the OS is only ONE .
If the OS is a ram-hog , you 're shit out of luck because it 's the ONE PROCESS you 're sure will be running alongside each and every time you launch an app .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're also ignoring that 7 will have more features than XP.
Word is bigger than Notepad.
Therefore Word is teh b10@3d!!!
OMG!1! Bigger doesn't necessarily mean bloated.
There might be some bloat, sure.
But NEW FEATURES ADD TO THE SIZE OF SOFTWARE.You are ignoring the fact that an OS is simply a platform of running other apps on.
The OS is not supposed to consume all the ram or even try to "push the boundaries" in the first place.
RAM is for executing apps, multiple apps, perhaps a plethora of apps; ram-requiring processes of which the OS is only ONE.
If the OS is a ram-hog, you're shit out of luck because it's the ONE PROCESS you're sure will be running alongside each and every time you launch an app.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836951</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>acohen1</author>
	<datestamp>1256234100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thats pretty much what I am making this post from. After disabling as much useless crap and stupid services as possible and using classic mode, it works but its really f'ing annoying. Frequent reboots help, which really pisses me off. Unfortunately its a work computer and I can't ask to add more ram and refuse to by my own for $30 out of principle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats pretty much what I am making this post from .
After disabling as much useless crap and stupid services as possible and using classic mode , it works but its really f'ing annoying .
Frequent reboots help , which really pisses me off .
Unfortunately its a work computer and I ca n't ask to add more ram and refuse to by my own for $ 30 out of principle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats pretty much what I am making this post from.
After disabling as much useless crap and stupid services as possible and using classic mode, it works but its really f'ing annoying.
Frequent reboots help, which really pisses me off.
Unfortunately its a work computer and I can't ask to add more ram and refuse to by my own for $30 out of principle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835031</id>
	<title>Re:Whoever proposed a bigger memory footprint than</title>
	<author>EmperorKagato</author>
	<datestamp>1256225760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's Windows Vista and not Windows 7.<br>
&nbsp; <br>4chan has already posted a guide on what is the lowest system you can expect to get windows 7 running on.<br>
&nbsp; <br>I'm bringing this up as an example since it is source outside of the popular media.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's Windows Vista and not Windows 7 .
  4chan has already posted a guide on what is the lowest system you can expect to get windows 7 running on .
  I 'm bringing this up as an example since it is source outside of the popular media .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's Windows Vista and not Windows 7.
  4chan has already posted a guide on what is the lowest system you can expect to get windows 7 running on.
  I'm bringing this up as an example since it is source outside of the popular media.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835327</id>
	<title>Re:An F-15 is much bigger than a P-51. OMG BLOAT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yes, because the fact that computers take 5 times longer to perform tasks that could be done with DOS 15 years ago is a sign of <em>progress</em>.</p><p>Faster hardware should <em>do more</em> than older hardware; not merely prevent bigger and fatter systems from running insanely slow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yes , because the fact that computers take 5 times longer to perform tasks that could be done with DOS 15 years ago is a sign of progress.Faster hardware should do more than older hardware ; not merely prevent bigger and fatter systems from running insanely slow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yes, because the fact that computers take 5 times longer to perform tasks that could be done with DOS 15 years ago is a sign of progress.Faster hardware should do more than older hardware; not merely prevent bigger and fatter systems from running insanely slow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844279</id>
	<title>Re:MS moves fast</title>
	<author>drsmithy</author>
	<datestamp>1256300520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>And yet they could have used the Internet for feedback well more than a decade ago.</i>
</p><p>*They* could have.  Their customers, on the other hand, probably couldn't.  In 1995, less than 10\% of people would have had internet connections.  Even ca. 1997-98, it was probably only around 30\%.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And yet they could have used the Internet for feedback well more than a decade ago .
* They * could have .
Their customers , on the other hand , probably could n't .
In 1995 , less than 10 \ % of people would have had internet connections .
Even ca .
1997-98 , it was probably only around 30 \ % .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> And yet they could have used the Internet for feedback well more than a decade ago.
*They* could have.
Their customers, on the other hand, probably couldn't.
In 1995, less than 10\% of people would have had internet connections.
Even ca.
1997-98, it was probably only around 30\%.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834797</id>
	<title>I can see it now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256224500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>User: Vista sux<br>M$: Ok, we will change the name to Windows 7<br>User: OK, glad you listened. Im ready to open my wallet.<br>M$: We know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>User : Vista suxM $ : Ok , we will change the name to Windows 7User : OK , glad you listened .
Im ready to open my wallet.M $ : We know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>User: Vista suxM$: Ok, we will change the name to Windows 7User: OK, glad you listened.
Im ready to open my wallet.M$: We know.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29845171</id>
	<title>Re:We Listened!</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1256307900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>We heard what you wanted and were sure to avoid those things at all costs.</i></p><p>Wait, what? TFA says <i>Caldas saw the registry discussion that popped up when we asked our readers for questions. While he didn't explicitly answer every question, he did use it as a jumping point to detail how Microsoft approaches user concerns. He said discussion at Microsoft would start off with a statement along the lines of "Clearly the registry is a solution to what people may or may not like."</i></p><p>Is there anybody out there that doesn't work for Microsoft that thinks the registry is a good idea? A single point of failure that grows bigger, slowing the OS down every time you boot the computer, that is practically impossible to parse with human eyes and so much work to repair that you're better of reinstalling the OS when it gets corrupted?</p><p>Anybody?</p><p><i>Microsoft understand how well users are succeeding at certain tasks, how they are failing at others, and how these users would be able to complete their task more efficiently.</i></p><p>So where did that lame "ribbon" idea come from and why was it implimented?</p><p><i>These tenets, which include things like performance, compatibility, and security</i></p><p>Odd their placing these "tenets" in the order they are, perhaps that's one reason MS software is so insecure compared to other vendors? I would think it shoud be security, useability, performance, then compatibility. And it's odd hearing MS talk of compatibility! Where's the option to save a Word document as an OO document, for instance? Microsoft has NEVER striven for compatibility; not even to the point of following accepted standards.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We heard what you wanted and were sure to avoid those things at all costs.Wait , what ?
TFA says Caldas saw the registry discussion that popped up when we asked our readers for questions .
While he did n't explicitly answer every question , he did use it as a jumping point to detail how Microsoft approaches user concerns .
He said discussion at Microsoft would start off with a statement along the lines of " Clearly the registry is a solution to what people may or may not like .
" Is there anybody out there that does n't work for Microsoft that thinks the registry is a good idea ?
A single point of failure that grows bigger , slowing the OS down every time you boot the computer , that is practically impossible to parse with human eyes and so much work to repair that you 're better of reinstalling the OS when it gets corrupted ? Anybody ? Microsoft understand how well users are succeeding at certain tasks , how they are failing at others , and how these users would be able to complete their task more efficiently.So where did that lame " ribbon " idea come from and why was it implimented ? These tenets , which include things like performance , compatibility , and securityOdd their placing these " tenets " in the order they are , perhaps that 's one reason MS software is so insecure compared to other vendors ?
I would think it shoud be security , useability , performance , then compatibility .
And it 's odd hearing MS talk of compatibility !
Where 's the option to save a Word document as an OO document , for instance ?
Microsoft has NEVER striven for compatibility ; not even to the point of following accepted standards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We heard what you wanted and were sure to avoid those things at all costs.Wait, what?
TFA says Caldas saw the registry discussion that popped up when we asked our readers for questions.
While he didn't explicitly answer every question, he did use it as a jumping point to detail how Microsoft approaches user concerns.
He said discussion at Microsoft would start off with a statement along the lines of "Clearly the registry is a solution to what people may or may not like.
"Is there anybody out there that doesn't work for Microsoft that thinks the registry is a good idea?
A single point of failure that grows bigger, slowing the OS down every time you boot the computer, that is practically impossible to parse with human eyes and so much work to repair that you're better of reinstalling the OS when it gets corrupted?Anybody?Microsoft understand how well users are succeeding at certain tasks, how they are failing at others, and how these users would be able to complete their task more efficiently.So where did that lame "ribbon" idea come from and why was it implimented?These tenets, which include things like performance, compatibility, and securityOdd their placing these "tenets" in the order they are, perhaps that's one reason MS software is so insecure compared to other vendors?
I would think it shoud be security, useability, performance, then compatibility.
And it's odd hearing MS talk of compatibility!
Where's the option to save a Word document as an OO document, for instance?
Microsoft has NEVER striven for compatibility; not even to the point of following accepted standards.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834771</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835939</id>
	<title>Re:Dear God...</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1256229660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>wait, you pay for software? how strange...</htmltext>
<tokenext>wait , you pay for software ?
how strange.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wait, you pay for software?
how strange...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29846079</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Tino</author>
	<datestamp>1256312880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nah.  The OS X girlfriend is very low-maintenance, except for the fact that she'll only consent to live in a house with everything already built in at construction time: a built-in coffee maker, microwave, etc.</p><p>Sure, a built-in coffee maker costs $300 while one that sits on the counter is $30. Windows likes the cheap coffee maker, but when it breaks you frequently find that you wind up having to tear down the whole house and build a new one around a replacement coffee maker.</p><p>The built-in coffee maker (almost) never breaks, and when it does it's easy to fix.   However, it appears to be totally incapable of making cappuccino.  You're not really sure, though, because the documentation just pretends that cappuccino doesn't exist.  You seem to remember hearing that Steve Jobs thinks that cappuccino is stupid.</p><p>The Linux girlfriend waits for someone to deliver coffee for free.  Amazingly, this actually works, every morning  When you find out that what's in the cup two days out of five is actually tea, you figure that that's close enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nah .
The OS X girlfriend is very low-maintenance , except for the fact that she 'll only consent to live in a house with everything already built in at construction time : a built-in coffee maker , microwave , etc.Sure , a built-in coffee maker costs $ 300 while one that sits on the counter is $ 30 .
Windows likes the cheap coffee maker , but when it breaks you frequently find that you wind up having to tear down the whole house and build a new one around a replacement coffee maker.The built-in coffee maker ( almost ) never breaks , and when it does it 's easy to fix .
However , it appears to be totally incapable of making cappuccino .
You 're not really sure , though , because the documentation just pretends that cappuccino does n't exist .
You seem to remember hearing that Steve Jobs thinks that cappuccino is stupid.The Linux girlfriend waits for someone to deliver coffee for free .
Amazingly , this actually works , every morning When you find out that what 's in the cup two days out of five is actually tea , you figure that that 's close enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nah.
The OS X girlfriend is very low-maintenance, except for the fact that she'll only consent to live in a house with everything already built in at construction time: a built-in coffee maker, microwave, etc.Sure, a built-in coffee maker costs $300 while one that sits on the counter is $30.
Windows likes the cheap coffee maker, but when it breaks you frequently find that you wind up having to tear down the whole house and build a new one around a replacement coffee maker.The built-in coffee maker (almost) never breaks, and when it does it's easy to fix.
However, it appears to be totally incapable of making cappuccino.
You're not really sure, though, because the documentation just pretends that cappuccino doesn't exist.
You seem to remember hearing that Steve Jobs thinks that cappuccino is stupid.The Linux girlfriend waits for someone to deliver coffee for free.
Amazingly, this actually works, every morning  When you find out that what's in the cup two days out of five is actually tea, you figure that that's close enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839649</id>
	<title>Re:Is there anything GOOD in windows 7....</title>
	<author>sponga</author>
	<datestamp>1256203320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ummm *true* XP compatibility and polished drivers now that Vista took the brutal hit on the new driver system, so most developers have dove into the new driver system. I think Linux missed the biggest opportunity ever to swoop in on the Vista blunder, they let it slip right through their fingers and didn't impress any businesses.</p><p>XP is getting pretty damn old now, what more else is there to explain besides support being dropped in the near future and machines that are 8+ years old.</p><p>People didn't switch to Vista because it was a little bloat(graphics system) until the service pack and hardware prices had not caught up to the performance demanded by it, almost all developers have released Vista drivers which are more than likely to be compatible with Win7. Vista just rolled out the red carpet for Win7, of course most will not switch switch until a service pack for Win7 but already the stability and minimal hardware requirments make it very appealing.</p><p>XP is that damn good though still as you can see by some of the defenders of it around here, but I never saw any of the praising for it around here until Vista was about to be launched. All of a sudden it was actually a good OS.</p><p>So don't rush right away to demand an ansewer right yet as to why you should upgrade, you just have to wait it out like any desktop OS and let your environment/economy allow you to change over.</p><p>If you are a regular user, than the next 2 years will be great years to get deals on laptops/desktops with Win7 if you have been waiting.<br>Business people will allow the the usual 1 year or service pack to sink in and than make the transition. XP still might be a lot of the backbone of some core applications but with Win7 XP compatibility it is looking more than ever appealing.</p><p>P.S. - We don't plan on upgrading any of our computers in our engineer and drafting room, those AutoCAD programs are essential and nothing too revolutionary has happened in AutoCAD that makes us want to upgrade to the newest versions. Although AutoCAD does support Vista and most of our older file formats have long been dropped that were only supported under &gt;XP.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ummm * true * XP compatibility and polished drivers now that Vista took the brutal hit on the new driver system , so most developers have dove into the new driver system .
I think Linux missed the biggest opportunity ever to swoop in on the Vista blunder , they let it slip right through their fingers and did n't impress any businesses.XP is getting pretty damn old now , what more else is there to explain besides support being dropped in the near future and machines that are 8 + years old.People did n't switch to Vista because it was a little bloat ( graphics system ) until the service pack and hardware prices had not caught up to the performance demanded by it , almost all developers have released Vista drivers which are more than likely to be compatible with Win7 .
Vista just rolled out the red carpet for Win7 , of course most will not switch switch until a service pack for Win7 but already the stability and minimal hardware requirments make it very appealing.XP is that damn good though still as you can see by some of the defenders of it around here , but I never saw any of the praising for it around here until Vista was about to be launched .
All of a sudden it was actually a good OS.So do n't rush right away to demand an ansewer right yet as to why you should upgrade , you just have to wait it out like any desktop OS and let your environment/economy allow you to change over.If you are a regular user , than the next 2 years will be great years to get deals on laptops/desktops with Win7 if you have been waiting.Business people will allow the the usual 1 year or service pack to sink in and than make the transition .
XP still might be a lot of the backbone of some core applications but with Win7 XP compatibility it is looking more than ever appealing.P.S .
- We do n't plan on upgrading any of our computers in our engineer and drafting room , those AutoCAD programs are essential and nothing too revolutionary has happened in AutoCAD that makes us want to upgrade to the newest versions .
Although AutoCAD does support Vista and most of our older file formats have long been dropped that were only supported under &gt; XP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ummm *true* XP compatibility and polished drivers now that Vista took the brutal hit on the new driver system, so most developers have dove into the new driver system.
I think Linux missed the biggest opportunity ever to swoop in on the Vista blunder, they let it slip right through their fingers and didn't impress any businesses.XP is getting pretty damn old now, what more else is there to explain besides support being dropped in the near future and machines that are 8+ years old.People didn't switch to Vista because it was a little bloat(graphics system) until the service pack and hardware prices had not caught up to the performance demanded by it, almost all developers have released Vista drivers which are more than likely to be compatible with Win7.
Vista just rolled out the red carpet for Win7, of course most will not switch switch until a service pack for Win7 but already the stability and minimal hardware requirments make it very appealing.XP is that damn good though still as you can see by some of the defenders of it around here, but I never saw any of the praising for it around here until Vista was about to be launched.
All of a sudden it was actually a good OS.So don't rush right away to demand an ansewer right yet as to why you should upgrade, you just have to wait it out like any desktop OS and let your environment/economy allow you to change over.If you are a regular user, than the next 2 years will be great years to get deals on laptops/desktops with Win7 if you have been waiting.Business people will allow the the usual 1 year or service pack to sink in and than make the transition.
XP still might be a lot of the backbone of some core applications but with Win7 XP compatibility it is looking more than ever appealing.P.S.
- We don't plan on upgrading any of our computers in our engineer and drafting room, those AutoCAD programs are essential and nothing too revolutionary has happened in AutoCAD that makes us want to upgrade to the newest versions.
Although AutoCAD does support Vista and most of our older file formats have long been dropped that were only supported under &gt;XP.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835847</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29841903</id>
	<title>Re:Let's give the devil his due</title>
	<author>Mashiki</author>
	<datestamp>1256219280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. ate my other reply.  But let me add this.  Why would you need to reboot and apply something that's in a standalone environment that works in a full offline mode?  Well that's obvious.  You don't.  It can sit there, and happily burn power all day.</p><p>Now if we're talking about something else, well sure.  Speaking of which, I haven't been an admin in 10 years.  But I did take care of around 8000 machines for a city at one time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh / .
ate my other reply .
But let me add this .
Why would you need to reboot and apply something that 's in a standalone environment that works in a full offline mode ?
Well that 's obvious .
You do n't .
It can sit there , and happily burn power all day.Now if we 're talking about something else , well sure .
Speaking of which , I have n't been an admin in 10 years .
But I did take care of around 8000 machines for a city at one time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh /.
ate my other reply.
But let me add this.
Why would you need to reboot and apply something that's in a standalone environment that works in a full offline mode?
Well that's obvious.
You don't.
It can sit there, and happily burn power all day.Now if we're talking about something else, well sure.
Speaking of which, I haven't been an admin in 10 years.
But I did take care of around 8000 machines for a city at one time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837211</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256235300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank you. Third best Slashdot post ever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you .
Third best Slashdot post ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you.
Third best Slashdot post ever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836935</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256234040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, I know right?  Since XP came out, Windows is just rock solid.  <a href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/08/11/bsod-strikes-during-beijing-olympic-games-opening-ceremony/" title="dvorak.org" rel="nofollow"> Oh...</a> [dvorak.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I know right ?
Since XP came out , Windows is just rock solid .
Oh... [ dvorak.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I know right?
Since XP came out, Windows is just rock solid.
Oh... [dvorak.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835137</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837783</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>ub3r n3u7r4l1st</author>
	<datestamp>1256237400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wish my love campaign end up like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish my love campaign end up like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish my love campaign end up like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844977</id>
	<title>Re:Dear God...</title>
	<author>bjs555</author>
	<datestamp>1256306400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One new feature in Win 7 that seems like a good idea to me is the native ability to do image backups of entire hard drives. I don't think that was available previously without 2nd party apps like Ghost or True Image. The Win 7 native imaging utility is somewhat limited (you can't browse an image for or restore individual files, for example) but it's still useful for disaster recovery.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One new feature in Win 7 that seems like a good idea to me is the native ability to do image backups of entire hard drives .
I do n't think that was available previously without 2nd party apps like Ghost or True Image .
The Win 7 native imaging utility is somewhat limited ( you ca n't browse an image for or restore individual files , for example ) but it 's still useful for disaster recovery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One new feature in Win 7 that seems like a good idea to me is the native ability to do image backups of entire hard drives.
I don't think that was available previously without 2nd party apps like Ghost or True Image.
The Win 7 native imaging utility is somewhat limited (you can't browse an image for or restore individual files, for example) but it's still useful for disaster recovery.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835367</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing to see here</title>
	<author>BlueBoxSW.com</author>
	<datestamp>1256227440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's why they call it astroturf.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's why they call it astroturf .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's why they call it astroturf.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842949</id>
	<title>anonymouse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256234340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>can you translate this into a guy analogy for me?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>can you translate this into a guy analogy for me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>can you translate this into a guy analogy for me?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835275</id>
	<title>Re:Whoever proposed a bigger memory footprint than</title>
	<author>Davemania</author>
	<datestamp>1256227020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hardware cost has gone down and the computational power has increased significantly. More complex software can be developed. Just because something uses more disk space and memory does not mean it is inefficient.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hardware cost has gone down and the computational power has increased significantly .
More complex software can be developed .
Just because something uses more disk space and memory does not mean it is inefficient .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hardware cost has gone down and the computational power has increased significantly.
More complex software can be developed.
Just because something uses more disk space and memory does not mean it is inefficient.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844249</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>drsmithy</author>
	<datestamp>1256300100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>They sorted that problem out about 10 years ago when Windows 2000 shipped.</i>
</p><p>Ten ?  More like fifteen.  I can count the number of BSODs I had with NT 4.0 on one hand, and most of those were hardware related.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They sorted that problem out about 10 years ago when Windows 2000 shipped .
Ten ?
More like fifteen .
I can count the number of BSODs I had with NT 4.0 on one hand , and most of those were hardware related .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> They sorted that problem out about 10 years ago when Windows 2000 shipped.
Ten ?
More like fifteen.
I can count the number of BSODs I had with NT 4.0 on one hand, and most of those were hardware related.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835729</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837711</id>
	<title>Re:Another Slashervertisment for Bill's Winders</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1256237160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, it's just Microsoft Technology Evangelist (TM) dollars at work.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/shrug</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it 's just Microsoft Technology Evangelist ( TM ) dollars at work .
/shrug</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it's just Microsoft Technology Evangelist (TM) dollars at work.
/shrug</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834831</id>
	<title>Let's give the devil his due</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256224740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Windows 7 plain rocks. Seems like Windows 2000 just got reincarnated and polished.</p><p>I've been running it for a while now and have no issues.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Windows 7 plain rocks .
Seems like Windows 2000 just got reincarnated and polished.I 've been running it for a while now and have no issues .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Windows 7 plain rocks.
Seems like Windows 2000 just got reincarnated and polished.I've been running it for a while now and have no issues.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837793</id>
	<title>Re:Dear God...</title>
	<author>Gilmoure</author>
	<datestamp>1256237400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Make 7</p><p>Up Yours!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Make 7Up Yours !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Make 7Up Yours!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837735</id>
	<title>Aero look for old Microsoft apps</title>
	<author>hey</author>
	<datestamp>1256237280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This was something I noticed when Vista came out...</p><p>To make application I have written have the Vista Aero look I had to recompile.  But I noticed that my old version of Microsoft Excel (2003) has the new look.  So there must be some code in in Vista that handles Microsoft projects nicer.  Which doesn't seem fair.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This was something I noticed when Vista came out...To make application I have written have the Vista Aero look I had to recompile .
But I noticed that my old version of Microsoft Excel ( 2003 ) has the new look .
So there must be some code in in Vista that handles Microsoft projects nicer .
Which does n't seem fair .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was something I noticed when Vista came out...To make application I have written have the Vista Aero look I had to recompile.
But I noticed that my old version of Microsoft Excel (2003) has the new look.
So there must be some code in in Vista that handles Microsoft projects nicer.
Which doesn't seem fair.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837181</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing to see here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256235180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's what I got from the title and summary:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Engineers Tell How Feedback Shaped Windows 7...There's some market speak you'll have to wade through...</p></div><p>Microsoft: Where even the engineers do market speak.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's what I got from the title and summary : Engineers Tell How Feedback Shaped Windows 7...There 's some market speak you 'll have to wade through...Microsoft : Where even the engineers do market speak .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's what I got from the title and summary:Engineers Tell How Feedback Shaped Windows 7...There's some market speak you'll have to wade through...Microsoft: Where even the engineers do market speak.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842325</id>
	<title>Windows 7 and the Demo Effect</title>
	<author>Bent Spoke</author>
	<datestamp>1256225160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I find these glowing reviews of Windows 7 to be, on the whole,
quite humorous.  After all,
this is a continuation of the decades old MS tradition of tailoring
software to maximize the demo impact.  Specifically, a users
first 5-15 minutes is the most important.
First impressions and all that rot.
</p><p>
Eye candy certainly plays a part in this, but it's more the
subtle hint that the software can do "a lot more than your seeing"
that's important.  After all, when it comes to software marketing,
implied functionality is far more important than actual functionality.
</p><p>
But at the end of the day, what are we really looking at.
It looks nicer!  For most users, that's about it.
</p><p>
Not to detract from their success.  This is a serious psychological
coup to pull off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find these glowing reviews of Windows 7 to be , on the whole , quite humorous .
After all , this is a continuation of the decades old MS tradition of tailoring software to maximize the demo impact .
Specifically , a users first 5-15 minutes is the most important .
First impressions and all that rot .
Eye candy certainly plays a part in this , but it 's more the subtle hint that the software can do " a lot more than your seeing " that 's important .
After all , when it comes to software marketing , implied functionality is far more important than actual functionality .
But at the end of the day , what are we really looking at .
It looks nicer !
For most users , that 's about it .
Not to detract from their success .
This is a serious psychological coup to pull off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I find these glowing reviews of Windows 7 to be, on the whole,
quite humorous.
After all,
this is a continuation of the decades old MS tradition of tailoring
software to maximize the demo impact.
Specifically, a users
first 5-15 minutes is the most important.
First impressions and all that rot.
Eye candy certainly plays a part in this, but it's more the
subtle hint that the software can do "a lot more than your seeing"
that's important.
After all, when it comes to software marketing,
implied functionality is far more important than actual functionality.
But at the end of the day, what are we really looking at.
It looks nicer!
For most users, that's about it.
Not to detract from their success.
This is a serious psychological
coup to pull off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835037</id>
	<title>And in Marketing Droid speak</title>
	<author>RotateLeftByte</author>
	<datestamp>1256225820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"If the suckers can afford our crappy O/S(aka Vista)" then they can afford<br>- More RAM<br>- bigger Hard Drive</p><p>Same argument goes for Windows 7 except the HDD.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" If the suckers can afford our crappy O/S ( aka Vista ) " then they can afford- More RAM- bigger Hard DriveSame argument goes for Windows 7 except the HDD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"If the suckers can afford our crappy O/S(aka Vista)" then they can afford- More RAM- bigger Hard DriveSame argument goes for Windows 7 except the HDD.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835281</id>
	<title>the hard worker</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have one thing very clear. Vista did the hard work that was needed to be done to change the way of Windows. Vista was a big step forward for Windows and a problematic one too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have one thing very clear .
Vista did the hard work that was needed to be done to change the way of Windows .
Vista was a big step forward for Windows and a problematic one too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have one thing very clear.
Vista did the hard work that was needed to be done to change the way of Windows.
Vista was a big step forward for Windows and a problematic one too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837043</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>MightyYar</author>
	<datestamp>1256234340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm a Mac guy, and Windows tends to drive me nuts... but stability isn't a problem on decent hardware with good drivers. My Windows crashes are almost always due to my video card, or perhaps it's driver. It was a lot worse back when I would shop by price.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a Mac guy , and Windows tends to drive me nuts... but stability is n't a problem on decent hardware with good drivers .
My Windows crashes are almost always due to my video card , or perhaps it 's driver .
It was a lot worse back when I would shop by price .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a Mac guy, and Windows tends to drive me nuts... but stability isn't a problem on decent hardware with good drivers.
My Windows crashes are almost always due to my video card, or perhaps it's driver.
It was a lot worse back when I would shop by price.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834775</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839529</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256202720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You say this yet you're very obviously posting on a Mac (convenient amnesia towards pre-OSX Apple) or Linux (pre-GUI amnesia). Your opinion isn't funny or even rational. The precious little you know about Windows seems to have been drawn from Vista (which is closer to the crazy bitch you talk about this whole wall of text) and the rest is hyperbole, assumption, and outright blatant lies.</p><p>Thinking this is any reflection on 7 shows a lack of experience with the OS and a lack of willing to  even try to see if it's any good, which coming from a user of the 2 OS's above, is funnier than any post you'll ever make.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You say this yet you 're very obviously posting on a Mac ( convenient amnesia towards pre-OSX Apple ) or Linux ( pre-GUI amnesia ) .
Your opinion is n't funny or even rational .
The precious little you know about Windows seems to have been drawn from Vista ( which is closer to the crazy bitch you talk about this whole wall of text ) and the rest is hyperbole , assumption , and outright blatant lies.Thinking this is any reflection on 7 shows a lack of experience with the OS and a lack of willing to even try to see if it 's any good , which coming from a user of the 2 OS 's above , is funnier than any post you 'll ever make .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You say this yet you're very obviously posting on a Mac (convenient amnesia towards pre-OSX Apple) or Linux (pre-GUI amnesia).
Your opinion isn't funny or even rational.
The precious little you know about Windows seems to have been drawn from Vista (which is closer to the crazy bitch you talk about this whole wall of text) and the rest is hyperbole, assumption, and outright blatant lies.Thinking this is any reflection on 7 shows a lack of experience with the OS and a lack of willing to  even try to see if it's any good, which coming from a user of the 2 OS's above, is funnier than any post you'll ever make.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838341</id>
	<title>Re:An F-15 is much bigger than a P-51. OMG BLOAT!</title>
	<author>richlv</author>
	<datestamp>1256239740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>my... i don't know, probably close to 10 years old machine gas p3 (733 mhz) and 512 mb of ram (maxed out).<br>it is adequate for web browsing, documents, runs ufo:ai... oh, and it has slackware-current.<br>the only case where it is not adequate - stiching panoramas from a bunch of 3+mb images.</p><p>now tell me again, at what ram your next box will start ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>my... i do n't know , probably close to 10 years old machine gas p3 ( 733 mhz ) and 512 mb of ram ( maxed out ) .it is adequate for web browsing , documents , runs ufo : ai... oh , and it has slackware-current.the only case where it is not adequate - stiching panoramas from a bunch of 3 + mb images.now tell me again , at what ram your next box will start ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>my... i don't know, probably close to 10 years old machine gas p3 (733 mhz) and 512 mb of ram (maxed out).it is adequate for web browsing, documents, runs ufo:ai... oh, and it has slackware-current.the only case where it is not adequate - stiching panoramas from a bunch of 3+mb images.now tell me again, at what ram your next box will start ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840929</id>
	<title>Ubuntu: "hi SEXY!" Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here..."</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256210580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Today I saw Vista trying to straddle a sleek hot box but she slipped and fell somewhere out of sight even though someone had glued her on, later I met Ubuntu on the same sleek hot box and it's the start of something wonderful, or at least something X-rated.</p><p>9.04 baby. Ubuntu has good looks, likes sex a lot, is completely faithful, and doesn't know or care what the word marriage means &lt;3</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Today I saw Vista trying to straddle a sleek hot box but she slipped and fell somewhere out of sight even though someone had glued her on , later I met Ubuntu on the same sleek hot box and it 's the start of something wonderful , or at least something X-rated.9.04 baby .
Ubuntu has good looks , likes sex a lot , is completely faithful , and does n't know or care what the word marriage means</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Today I saw Vista trying to straddle a sleek hot box but she slipped and fell somewhere out of sight even though someone had glued her on, later I met Ubuntu on the same sleek hot box and it's the start of something wonderful, or at least something X-rated.9.04 baby.
Ubuntu has good looks, likes sex a lot, is completely faithful, and doesn't know or care what the word marriage means </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835487</id>
	<title>marketing waffle</title>
	<author>rs232</author>
	<datestamp>1256227920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"<i>Last night, we had the pleasure of talking with three members of the Windows 7 product development and planning team</i>"<br> <br>

There's you problem right their, no mention of the people who actually write the code, and it's a little late to the party to figure out that the end users might have a clue as to what they want. A simple uncluttered desktop that does what you want.<br>
-------<br> <br>

<strong>Key Words</strong>:<br> <br>
<i>beta feedback, beta testers , bugs were squashed, change, compatibility,, data-gathering, development principles, discussions,, diverse set of datapoints, drilling , emotional value, enterprise customers, explanations, feedback, focus, footprints, fundamentals for PC experience, improve the experience., initial hypotheses , internal processes, iterating,, leverage, listening,, market research,, outreach,, partners , performance,, pipelines, planning,, primary research, process, product development and planning team, quantitative data, quantitative panels, reacting , richness of the Windows ecosystem, security, snapshots, surveys, telemetry data, tenets, the user experience perspective, trends, triangulation, UI decision, unsatisfying emotion</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Last night , we had the pleasure of talking with three members of the Windows 7 product development and planning team " There 's you problem right their , no mention of the people who actually write the code , and it 's a little late to the party to figure out that the end users might have a clue as to what they want .
A simple uncluttered desktop that does what you want .
------- Key Words : beta feedback , beta testers , bugs were squashed , change , compatibility, , data-gathering , development principles , discussions, , diverse set of datapoints , drilling , emotional value , enterprise customers , explanations , feedback , focus , footprints , fundamentals for PC experience , improve the experience. , initial hypotheses , internal processes , iterating, , leverage , listening, , market research, , outreach, , partners , performance, , pipelines , planning, , primary research , process , product development and planning team , quantitative data , quantitative panels , reacting , richness of the Windows ecosystem , security , snapshots , surveys , telemetry data , tenets , the user experience perspective , trends , triangulation , UI decision , unsatisfying emotion</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Last night, we had the pleasure of talking with three members of the Windows 7 product development and planning team" 

There's you problem right their, no mention of the people who actually write the code, and it's a little late to the party to figure out that the end users might have a clue as to what they want.
A simple uncluttered desktop that does what you want.
------- 

Key Words: 
beta feedback, beta testers , bugs were squashed, change, compatibility,, data-gathering, development principles, discussions,, diverse set of datapoints, drilling , emotional value, enterprise customers, explanations, feedback, focus, footprints, fundamentals for PC experience, improve the experience., initial hypotheses , internal processes, iterating,, leverage, listening,, market research,, outreach,, partners , performance,, pipelines, planning,, primary research, process, product development and planning team, quantitative data, quantitative panels, reacting , richness of the Windows ecosystem, security, snapshots, surveys, telemetry data, tenets, the user experience perspective, trends, triangulation, UI decision, unsatisfying emotion</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835475</id>
	<title>Re:Dear God...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Continued support?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Continued support ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Continued support?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838811</id>
	<title>Re:Let's give the devil his due</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256242080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you have gone 460 days without a reboot, it's because you haven't been applying security updates. Your system is highly vulnerable, and you are a joke as a system administrator.</p><p>Turn in your geek card NOW.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have gone 460 days without a reboot , it 's because you have n't been applying security updates .
Your system is highly vulnerable , and you are a joke as a system administrator.Turn in your geek card NOW .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you have gone 460 days without a reboot, it's because you haven't been applying security updates.
Your system is highly vulnerable, and you are a joke as a system administrator.Turn in your geek card NOW.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836343</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29854313</id>
	<title>Re:Window's Explorer...</title>
	<author>jtcm</author>
	<datestamp>1256319720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I hate Vista's Explorer with a passion.</p></div></blockquote><p>Windows 7's explorer is even worse. I use Vista at work and Windows 7 at home. A lot of other posters are saying this, and they're right: Windows 7 is basically just a glorified service pack for Vista with a less hideous color scheme.</p><p>Sadly, for every nice new feature in Win7, there's three other changes that baffle and anger me. For example, Win7 explorer <a href="http://superuser.com/questions/19232/is-there-a-way-for-windows-7-to-show-remaining-disk-space-in-the-status-bar/19315" title="superuser.com">no longer displays the amount of free space available</a> [superuser.com] on your drive. That decision just makes no sense to me. Another thing I find annoying is that when you drill-down into folders in the right-hand pane, the left-hand folder tree no longer stays in sync.</p><p>Sure, Vista explorer will randomly decide that some code folder actually has music and display columns for "artist" and "rating", but at least I can tell how much free space I have on the drive at a glance.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate Vista 's Explorer with a passion.Windows 7 's explorer is even worse .
I use Vista at work and Windows 7 at home .
A lot of other posters are saying this , and they 're right : Windows 7 is basically just a glorified service pack for Vista with a less hideous color scheme.Sadly , for every nice new feature in Win7 , there 's three other changes that baffle and anger me .
For example , Win7 explorer no longer displays the amount of free space available [ superuser.com ] on your drive .
That decision just makes no sense to me .
Another thing I find annoying is that when you drill-down into folders in the right-hand pane , the left-hand folder tree no longer stays in sync.Sure , Vista explorer will randomly decide that some code folder actually has music and display columns for " artist " and " rating " , but at least I can tell how much free space I have on the drive at a glance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate Vista's Explorer with a passion.Windows 7's explorer is even worse.
I use Vista at work and Windows 7 at home.
A lot of other posters are saying this, and they're right: Windows 7 is basically just a glorified service pack for Vista with a less hideous color scheme.Sadly, for every nice new feature in Win7, there's three other changes that baffle and anger me.
For example, Win7 explorer no longer displays the amount of free space available [superuser.com] on your drive.
That decision just makes no sense to me.
Another thing I find annoying is that when you drill-down into folders in the right-hand pane, the left-hand folder tree no longer stays in sync.Sure, Vista explorer will randomly decide that some code folder actually has music and display columns for "artist" and "rating", but at least I can tell how much free space I have on the drive at a glance.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835321</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838365</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256239860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They forgot to mention xp mode. Or you can still see her before surgery running this mode...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They forgot to mention xp mode .
Or you can still see her before surgery running this mode.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They forgot to mention xp mode.
Or you can still see her before surgery running this mode...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837993</id>
	<title>Microsoft Engineers Meeting</title>
	<author>palmerj3</author>
	<datestamp>1256238180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>People: "Vista is a piece of crap." <br> <br>

Engineer 1: "So, people don't want a piece of crap?"<br>
Engineer 2: "Ok, so we'll rewrite the whole OS and start over.  It'll be great!"<br> <br>

Several months later...<br> <br>

Engineer 2: "Damn, this is hard!"<br>
Engineer 1: "Copy Apple?"<br>
Engineer 2: "Damn straight.  Beer time."<br> <br>

Windows 7</htmltext>
<tokenext>People : " Vista is a piece of crap .
" Engineer 1 : " So , people do n't want a piece of crap ?
" Engineer 2 : " Ok , so we 'll rewrite the whole OS and start over .
It 'll be great !
" Several months later.. . Engineer 2 : " Damn , this is hard !
" Engineer 1 : " Copy Apple ?
" Engineer 2 : " Damn straight .
Beer time .
" Windows 7</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People: "Vista is a piece of crap.
"  

Engineer 1: "So, people don't want a piece of crap?
"
Engineer 2: "Ok, so we'll rewrite the whole OS and start over.
It'll be great!
" 

Several months later... 

Engineer 2: "Damn, this is hard!
"
Engineer 1: "Copy Apple?
"
Engineer 2: "Damn straight.
Beer time.
" 

Windows 7</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842109</id>
	<title>Re:MS moves fast</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256222280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly. Call me when they have an email address to report bugs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
Call me when they have an email address to report bugs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
Call me when they have an email address to report bugs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834859</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29942404</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257098640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I get the impression that the Windows 7 launch is a lot like seeing an old girlfriend suddenly show up on your doorstep wanting to get back together.  She's had some work done, apparently: stomach stapling to take off some of the weight, breast augmentation, and a radical nosejob to make her look as much like your current girlfriend as medical science will allow.</p><p>She's pretty, of course, almost too pretty.  She still wears far too much makeup and carries that desperate look in her eyes.  The fragrant haze around her is the perfume she overuses to mask the scent of failure.</p><p>But standing there in that low-cut top, you'd almost forget for a moment what a psycho she was- how she used to shut down in the middle of a date and forget everything you were talking about and how she was only happy when you were buying her things. You'd almost forget about carrying around her legacy baggage or those nights when, for seemingly no reason at all, she would simply stop speaking to you and when you asked what was wrong she'd just spit a string of hex code at you and expect you to figure it out.</p><p>You complained about her for years before finally deciding to get rid of her, and here she is again.  Though, somehow she seems like a completely different person now.</p><p>"I'm up here," she says when she catches you staring at her chest.</p><p>Tempted though you may be, you know that over time she'll get bored and slow down on you just like she always does. And then you'll be right back where you started: trapped. She keeps you by convincing you that you don't have a choice. You're just not smart enough for one option or rich enough to afford the other.</p><p>"But I'm different now," she says, batting her eyes innocently. "I've changed."</p><p>Indeed she has.  Apparently, she's really into Cabala now or something like that.  It's helped her discover loads of untapped potential in herself. But it also means that you'll have to buy all new furniture to fit with her understanding of feng shui.  That's not the only change she has in store for you. The minute you let her move in, she'll have a new alarm system put in that succeeds only in preventing your friends from coming over on poker night.</p><p>She doesn't love you, but she doesn't hate you, either. The truth is that she couldn't care less one way or the other.  She's here because she doesn't want to be alone. Like all human beings, especially those well past their prime, she wants to feel wanted and, after a string of lost jobs and bad investments, she needs a place to stay.</p><p>But all in all, she's OK. She's a seven. She'll do, I guess.</p></div><p>best analogy ever dude</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I get the impression that the Windows 7 launch is a lot like seeing an old girlfriend suddenly show up on your doorstep wanting to get back together .
She 's had some work done , apparently : stomach stapling to take off some of the weight , breast augmentation , and a radical nosejob to make her look as much like your current girlfriend as medical science will allow.She 's pretty , of course , almost too pretty .
She still wears far too much makeup and carries that desperate look in her eyes .
The fragrant haze around her is the perfume she overuses to mask the scent of failure.But standing there in that low-cut top , you 'd almost forget for a moment what a psycho she was- how she used to shut down in the middle of a date and forget everything you were talking about and how she was only happy when you were buying her things .
You 'd almost forget about carrying around her legacy baggage or those nights when , for seemingly no reason at all , she would simply stop speaking to you and when you asked what was wrong she 'd just spit a string of hex code at you and expect you to figure it out.You complained about her for years before finally deciding to get rid of her , and here she is again .
Though , somehow she seems like a completely different person now .
" I 'm up here , " she says when she catches you staring at her chest.Tempted though you may be , you know that over time she 'll get bored and slow down on you just like she always does .
And then you 'll be right back where you started : trapped .
She keeps you by convincing you that you do n't have a choice .
You 're just not smart enough for one option or rich enough to afford the other .
" But I 'm different now , " she says , batting her eyes innocently .
" I 've changed .
" Indeed she has .
Apparently , she 's really into Cabala now or something like that .
It 's helped her discover loads of untapped potential in herself .
But it also means that you 'll have to buy all new furniture to fit with her understanding of feng shui .
That 's not the only change she has in store for you .
The minute you let her move in , she 'll have a new alarm system put in that succeeds only in preventing your friends from coming over on poker night.She does n't love you , but she does n't hate you , either .
The truth is that she could n't care less one way or the other .
She 's here because she does n't want to be alone .
Like all human beings , especially those well past their prime , she wants to feel wanted and , after a string of lost jobs and bad investments , she needs a place to stay.But all in all , she 's OK. She 's a seven .
She 'll do , I guess.best analogy ever dude</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I get the impression that the Windows 7 launch is a lot like seeing an old girlfriend suddenly show up on your doorstep wanting to get back together.
She's had some work done, apparently: stomach stapling to take off some of the weight, breast augmentation, and a radical nosejob to make her look as much like your current girlfriend as medical science will allow.She's pretty, of course, almost too pretty.
She still wears far too much makeup and carries that desperate look in her eyes.
The fragrant haze around her is the perfume she overuses to mask the scent of failure.But standing there in that low-cut top, you'd almost forget for a moment what a psycho she was- how she used to shut down in the middle of a date and forget everything you were talking about and how she was only happy when you were buying her things.
You'd almost forget about carrying around her legacy baggage or those nights when, for seemingly no reason at all, she would simply stop speaking to you and when you asked what was wrong she'd just spit a string of hex code at you and expect you to figure it out.You complained about her for years before finally deciding to get rid of her, and here she is again.
Though, somehow she seems like a completely different person now.
"I'm up here," she says when she catches you staring at her chest.Tempted though you may be, you know that over time she'll get bored and slow down on you just like she always does.
And then you'll be right back where you started: trapped.
She keeps you by convincing you that you don't have a choice.
You're just not smart enough for one option or rich enough to afford the other.
"But I'm different now," she says, batting her eyes innocently.
"I've changed.
"Indeed she has.
Apparently, she's really into Cabala now or something like that.
It's helped her discover loads of untapped potential in herself.
But it also means that you'll have to buy all new furniture to fit with her understanding of feng shui.
That's not the only change she has in store for you.
The minute you let her move in, she'll have a new alarm system put in that succeeds only in preventing your friends from coming over on poker night.She doesn't love you, but she doesn't hate you, either.
The truth is that she couldn't care less one way or the other.
She's here because she doesn't want to be alone.
Like all human beings, especially those well past their prime, she wants to feel wanted and, after a string of lost jobs and bad investments, she needs a place to stay.But all in all, she's OK. She's a seven.
She'll do, I guess.best analogy ever dude
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838307</id>
	<title>M$ and astroturfers always listens to M$ addicts</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256239560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>M$ addicts and astroturfers responds to M$'s questions by giving them what they want, no problems with M$ software.  In general, M$ will never listen to anyone.  The only concern M$ has is to keep their illegal monopoly on software.  Free software can only go so far in eliminateing the illegal M$ monopoly.  The EU and US both need to get some balls and eliminate all patents, then fine M$ for billions per dayand force M$ to open everything to eliminate the M$ monopoly.  Once all that is done arrest Bill Gates, SweatyB, Paul Allen along with the rest of M$'s executives and astroturfers.</p><p>--<br>Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.<br>Friends do assist M$ addicted friends in committing suicide.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>M $ addicts and astroturfers responds to M $ 's questions by giving them what they want , no problems with M $ software .
In general , M $ will never listen to anyone .
The only concern M $ has is to keep their illegal monopoly on software .
Free software can only go so far in eliminateing the illegal M $ monopoly .
The EU and US both need to get some balls and eliminate all patents , then fine M $ for billions per dayand force M $ to open everything to eliminate the M $ monopoly .
Once all that is done arrest Bill Gates , SweatyB , Paul Allen along with the rest of M $ 's executives and astroturfers.--Friends do n't help friends install M $ junk.Friends do assist M $ addicted friends in committing suicide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>M$ addicts and astroturfers responds to M$'s questions by giving them what they want, no problems with M$ software.
In general, M$ will never listen to anyone.
The only concern M$ has is to keep their illegal monopoly on software.
Free software can only go so far in eliminateing the illegal M$ monopoly.
The EU and US both need to get some balls and eliminate all patents, then fine M$ for billions per dayand force M$ to open everything to eliminate the M$ monopoly.
Once all that is done arrest Bill Gates, SweatyB, Paul Allen along with the rest of M$'s executives and astroturfers.--Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.Friends do assist M$ addicted friends in committing suicide.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834771</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842129</id>
	<title>Re:Is there anything GOOD in windows 7....</title>
	<author>daver00</author>
	<datestamp>1256222580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>XP has a clumsy user interface, the flyout menu model of the start bar is ridiculous, cluttered and an all out navigation nightmare. Indexed search is present in just about every part of 7 (and Vista), which vastly improves the speed at which you can accomplish just about everything. Libraries are a brilliant addition to the explorer interface, saves me a whole lot of digging through folders and thus saves me a *lot* of time. The new taskbar is very nice, and the new UI features for window management, while they seem trivial, are a real boon, especially for widescreen monitors.</p><p>There are a bunch of under the hood improvements as well. Honestly I don't even see how your question is asked anymore, its verging on the level of troll. I guess IT nerds are just getting old.</p><p>Seriously though, give it a try, and I mean really give it a TRY, using it and saying you hate it immediately because the interface is unfamiliar is an easy cop-out and completely pointless. Anything new must always be learned.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>XP has a clumsy user interface , the flyout menu model of the start bar is ridiculous , cluttered and an all out navigation nightmare .
Indexed search is present in just about every part of 7 ( and Vista ) , which vastly improves the speed at which you can accomplish just about everything .
Libraries are a brilliant addition to the explorer interface , saves me a whole lot of digging through folders and thus saves me a * lot * of time .
The new taskbar is very nice , and the new UI features for window management , while they seem trivial , are a real boon , especially for widescreen monitors.There are a bunch of under the hood improvements as well .
Honestly I do n't even see how your question is asked anymore , its verging on the level of troll .
I guess IT nerds are just getting old.Seriously though , give it a try , and I mean really give it a TRY , using it and saying you hate it immediately because the interface is unfamiliar is an easy cop-out and completely pointless .
Anything new must always be learned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>XP has a clumsy user interface, the flyout menu model of the start bar is ridiculous, cluttered and an all out navigation nightmare.
Indexed search is present in just about every part of 7 (and Vista), which vastly improves the speed at which you can accomplish just about everything.
Libraries are a brilliant addition to the explorer interface, saves me a whole lot of digging through folders and thus saves me a *lot* of time.
The new taskbar is very nice, and the new UI features for window management, while they seem trivial, are a real boon, especially for widescreen monitors.There are a bunch of under the hood improvements as well.
Honestly I don't even see how your question is asked anymore, its verging on the level of troll.
I guess IT nerds are just getting old.Seriously though, give it a try, and I mean really give it a TRY, using it and saying you hate it immediately because the interface is unfamiliar is an easy cop-out and completely pointless.
Anything new must always be learned.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835847</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838755</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256241840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, if I am following your logic, Linux is that girl who is a braniac nerd girl, who is not quite attractive, always trying to copy what the popular girls are doing. She is kinda desperate and hooks up with anyone and everyone. She is always a dependable lay.</p><p>Mac OS is that super popular, super pretty girl who makes sure that you pay through your nose when dating her. You always know who has the power in this relationship (hint: it is not you), but she is so pretty, you just kinda ignore it. You will do anything to defend her and turn your nose at your friends who you think are "settling for less".</p><p>Seven is looking better and better...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , if I am following your logic , Linux is that girl who is a braniac nerd girl , who is not quite attractive , always trying to copy what the popular girls are doing .
She is kinda desperate and hooks up with anyone and everyone .
She is always a dependable lay.Mac OS is that super popular , super pretty girl who makes sure that you pay through your nose when dating her .
You always know who has the power in this relationship ( hint : it is not you ) , but she is so pretty , you just kinda ignore it .
You will do anything to defend her and turn your nose at your friends who you think are " settling for less " .Seven is looking better and better.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, if I am following your logic, Linux is that girl who is a braniac nerd girl, who is not quite attractive, always trying to copy what the popular girls are doing.
She is kinda desperate and hooks up with anyone and everyone.
She is always a dependable lay.Mac OS is that super popular, super pretty girl who makes sure that you pay through your nose when dating her.
You always know who has the power in this relationship (hint: it is not you), but she is so pretty, you just kinda ignore it.
You will do anything to defend her and turn your nose at your friends who you think are "settling for less".Seven is looking better and better...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836387</id>
	<title>Re:Window's Explorer...</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1256231820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The one thing that bugs me about Vista is that they got rid of Filmstrip view in Explorer. You can kind of "simulate" it by dinking with icon size and turning on the preview pane, but it's just not the same.</p><p>That said, I don't want Microsoft to ship&amp;support two versions of Explorer. It's just more for them to QA, and odds are instead of hiring more QA staff, they'd simply QA each version half as much-- I'd much rather have one fully debugged file browser that isn't exactly what I want.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The one thing that bugs me about Vista is that they got rid of Filmstrip view in Explorer .
You can kind of " simulate " it by dinking with icon size and turning on the preview pane , but it 's just not the same.That said , I do n't want Microsoft to ship&amp;support two versions of Explorer .
It 's just more for them to QA , and odds are instead of hiring more QA staff , they 'd simply QA each version half as much-- I 'd much rather have one fully debugged file browser that is n't exactly what I want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The one thing that bugs me about Vista is that they got rid of Filmstrip view in Explorer.
You can kind of "simulate" it by dinking with icon size and turning on the preview pane, but it's just not the same.That said, I don't want Microsoft to ship&amp;support two versions of Explorer.
It's just more for them to QA, and odds are instead of hiring more QA staff, they'd simply QA each version half as much-- I'd much rather have one fully debugged file browser that isn't exactly what I want.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835321</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837775</id>
	<title>Re:Dear God...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256237340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As a footnote, many people don't realize you can't really upgrade from XP either. Your upgrade is wiping your computer, and installing everything from scratch. I consider this a terrible mistake on Microsoft's part, to constantly shut down upgrade paths. It is almost like they don't want their customers to spend money to upgrade. They do their best to dissuade them. We're looking at a scenario here where we won't be able to upgrade to the latest Exchange 2010 because we're on 2003, and there is no direct upgrade path. And we're not wiping out entire Exchange server and starting anew.</p></div><p>You obviously don't remember Windows XP SP2. I think everyone agrees that it massively improved the operating system, stability, speed, everything got better. But do you remember how many PCs needed a wipe and reinstall to clean up a failed install?</p><p>The problem in that case wasn't the quality of the SP installer, but due to how horribly people had managed to mess up their systems and have them still limp along. Typically this was caused by dodgy drivers and AV packages leaving their hooks all over the kernel. </p><p>Now think how many XP systems are currently in that state. Systems that would probably have fallen over during an upgrade to Vista, and have had an extra 2 years to accumulate cruft? An in-place upgrade to Windows 7 could ever be expected to work on all of those, or even a sizable proportion of them. I think MS did the right thing by just improving the files and settings transfer tools and guiding people through a backup and clean install.</p><p>Hopefully that mess is largely behind us. MS have done a lot of work on the underlying driver APIs (including throwing out the audio engine and rewriting it) to try and prevent/reduce the kind of mess people got into in the past. A lot of the negative comments about Win7 have been along the lines of "It's just Vista tidied up a bit". But haven't people been clamouring for MS to get their house in order and make it so computers don't get slower over time? </p><p>As for your exchange problem, it is a bit of a bind, but MS have never officially supported skipping a release on the server side. There is a workaround though, if you have another box you can bring in for the short term. It's called using a "swing server", and works for a lot of Windows Server upgrade scenarios. Use one of the evaluation release versions of windows to create another server in the same domain, migrate the AD master server and your mailboxes onto the temporary server, install the new version of Server on the old box, re-add to the domain and "swing" back all the services onto it.</p><p>It's a bit more work than an in-place upgrade, but actually has less downtime</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a footnote , many people do n't realize you ca n't really upgrade from XP either .
Your upgrade is wiping your computer , and installing everything from scratch .
I consider this a terrible mistake on Microsoft 's part , to constantly shut down upgrade paths .
It is almost like they do n't want their customers to spend money to upgrade .
They do their best to dissuade them .
We 're looking at a scenario here where we wo n't be able to upgrade to the latest Exchange 2010 because we 're on 2003 , and there is no direct upgrade path .
And we 're not wiping out entire Exchange server and starting anew.You obviously do n't remember Windows XP SP2 .
I think everyone agrees that it massively improved the operating system , stability , speed , everything got better .
But do you remember how many PCs needed a wipe and reinstall to clean up a failed install ? The problem in that case was n't the quality of the SP installer , but due to how horribly people had managed to mess up their systems and have them still limp along .
Typically this was caused by dodgy drivers and AV packages leaving their hooks all over the kernel .
Now think how many XP systems are currently in that state .
Systems that would probably have fallen over during an upgrade to Vista , and have had an extra 2 years to accumulate cruft ?
An in-place upgrade to Windows 7 could ever be expected to work on all of those , or even a sizable proportion of them .
I think MS did the right thing by just improving the files and settings transfer tools and guiding people through a backup and clean install.Hopefully that mess is largely behind us .
MS have done a lot of work on the underlying driver APIs ( including throwing out the audio engine and rewriting it ) to try and prevent/reduce the kind of mess people got into in the past .
A lot of the negative comments about Win7 have been along the lines of " It 's just Vista tidied up a bit " .
But have n't people been clamouring for MS to get their house in order and make it so computers do n't get slower over time ?
As for your exchange problem , it is a bit of a bind , but MS have never officially supported skipping a release on the server side .
There is a workaround though , if you have another box you can bring in for the short term .
It 's called using a " swing server " , and works for a lot of Windows Server upgrade scenarios .
Use one of the evaluation release versions of windows to create another server in the same domain , migrate the AD master server and your mailboxes onto the temporary server , install the new version of Server on the old box , re-add to the domain and " swing " back all the services onto it.It 's a bit more work than an in-place upgrade , but actually has less downtime</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a footnote, many people don't realize you can't really upgrade from XP either.
Your upgrade is wiping your computer, and installing everything from scratch.
I consider this a terrible mistake on Microsoft's part, to constantly shut down upgrade paths.
It is almost like they don't want their customers to spend money to upgrade.
They do their best to dissuade them.
We're looking at a scenario here where we won't be able to upgrade to the latest Exchange 2010 because we're on 2003, and there is no direct upgrade path.
And we're not wiping out entire Exchange server and starting anew.You obviously don't remember Windows XP SP2.
I think everyone agrees that it massively improved the operating system, stability, speed, everything got better.
But do you remember how many PCs needed a wipe and reinstall to clean up a failed install?The problem in that case wasn't the quality of the SP installer, but due to how horribly people had managed to mess up their systems and have them still limp along.
Typically this was caused by dodgy drivers and AV packages leaving their hooks all over the kernel.
Now think how many XP systems are currently in that state.
Systems that would probably have fallen over during an upgrade to Vista, and have had an extra 2 years to accumulate cruft?
An in-place upgrade to Windows 7 could ever be expected to work on all of those, or even a sizable proportion of them.
I think MS did the right thing by just improving the files and settings transfer tools and guiding people through a backup and clean install.Hopefully that mess is largely behind us.
MS have done a lot of work on the underlying driver APIs (including throwing out the audio engine and rewriting it) to try and prevent/reduce the kind of mess people got into in the past.
A lot of the negative comments about Win7 have been along the lines of "It's just Vista tidied up a bit".
But haven't people been clamouring for MS to get their house in order and make it so computers don't get slower over time?
As for your exchange problem, it is a bit of a bind, but MS have never officially supported skipping a release on the server side.
There is a workaround though, if you have another box you can bring in for the short term.
It's called using a "swing server", and works for a lot of Windows Server upgrade scenarios.
Use one of the evaluation release versions of windows to create another server in the same domain, migrate the AD master server and your mailboxes onto the temporary server, install the new version of Server on the old box, re-add to the domain and "swing" back all the services onto it.It's a bit more work than an in-place upgrade, but actually has less downtime
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835607</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836383</id>
	<title>Re:Dear God...</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1256231820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better 64bit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better 64bit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better 64bit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842747</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256230980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure if a girlfriend analogy would be the best choice in a geek forum.</p><p>@grmendes</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure if a girlfriend analogy would be the best choice in a geek forum .
@ grmendes</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure if a girlfriend analogy would be the best choice in a geek forum.
@grmendes</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834793</id>
	<title>Better than how the Linux people respond</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256224500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Read the fucking manual. It's supposed to work that way.</p><p>M$ is teh evil<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-(&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Read the fucking manual .
It 's supposed to work that way.M $ is teh evil : - ( &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read the fucking manual.
It's supposed to work that way.M$ is teh evil :-(&gt;</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29862699</id>
	<title>Linda Linux &amp; Wanda Windows</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256413380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why just one girl. Forget about Mac girl lives with her parents, and she just too stiff to play a real games without the multiple personality tricks. Linux Lady is ready any time boys, and she can will play allot of games with me, but I know how to play with here. She is comfortable with me tinkering with here private places, and I often do to get what I need form her. She also works very hard me, serving, distributing, compiling with and with complaint, and more.  She likes Java and Java frees her mind.  Her Kernel and mine a build for each other. She needs the right type on man. She does not mind me gamming with the other girl, Windows. Windows is not a bad lady, but has some mental issues, and has some emotions scarring. I believe she could make a full recovers if she would just let me into to here private spaces, I could love correctly. I would make here sing, but she has trust issues and often goes behind my back and hurts me. I wish her well, but I cannot be faithful to here until get is faithful back. If Linux could learn to speak to my kids as Windows does I would not play with  Windows and more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why just one girl .
Forget about Mac girl lives with her parents , and she just too stiff to play a real games without the multiple personality tricks .
Linux Lady is ready any time boys , and she can will play allot of games with me , but I know how to play with here .
She is comfortable with me tinkering with here private places , and I often do to get what I need form her .
She also works very hard me , serving , distributing , compiling with and with complaint , and more .
She likes Java and Java frees her mind .
Her Kernel and mine a build for each other .
She needs the right type on man .
She does not mind me gamming with the other girl , Windows .
Windows is not a bad lady , but has some mental issues , and has some emotions scarring .
I believe she could make a full recovers if she would just let me into to here private spaces , I could love correctly .
I would make here sing , but she has trust issues and often goes behind my back and hurts me .
I wish her well , but I can not be faithful to here until get is faithful back .
If Linux could learn to speak to my kids as Windows does I would not play with Windows and more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why just one girl.
Forget about Mac girl lives with her parents, and she just too stiff to play a real games without the multiple personality tricks.
Linux Lady is ready any time boys, and she can will play allot of games with me, but I know how to play with here.
She is comfortable with me tinkering with here private places, and I often do to get what I need form her.
She also works very hard me, serving, distributing, compiling with and with complaint, and more.
She likes Java and Java frees her mind.
Her Kernel and mine a build for each other.
She needs the right type on man.
She does not mind me gamming with the other girl, Windows.
Windows is not a bad lady, but has some mental issues, and has some emotions scarring.
I believe she could make a full recovers if she would just let me into to here private spaces, I could love correctly.
I would make here sing, but she has trust issues and often goes behind my back and hurts me.
I wish her well, but I cannot be faithful to here until get is faithful back.
If Linux could learn to speak to my kids as Windows does I would not play with  Windows and more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835099</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>orsty3001</author>
	<datestamp>1256226120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I try to tell people this but they can SEE the improvements and how much better it works.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I try to tell people this but they can SEE the improvements and how much better it works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I try to tell people this but they can SEE the improvements and how much better it works.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838249</id>
	<title>Re:Yet another troll...</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1256239260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is plenty of trolling.  And abuse of mod points.</p><p>I happen to think you're right.  I'm anti-Microsoft, but honesty makes me say that Win 7 is decent.  So far, it works on all the hardware I've tried it on - as old as the original Athlon 1 Ghz machines.  Of course, it's kinda slow on that machine, but it WORKS.</p><p>Huge improvement over that Vista abortion.  Yeah, I know, lots of people thought Vista was good.  Well, it never ran right on any of my hardware, including a 2.4 Ghz dual core Opteron with 8 gig of memory.  Phhht.</p><p>Whatever - people who abuse their mod points like this are total asses, with no life.  Screw 'em.  Someone with a big stick needs to beat the Slashdot staff til they add new mods.  Simple "Agree" and "Disagree" buttons, like has often been suggested should solve the problem.  For that matter, those two buttons could be seperate from the rest of the mods - everyone has them all the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is plenty of trolling .
And abuse of mod points.I happen to think you 're right .
I 'm anti-Microsoft , but honesty makes me say that Win 7 is decent .
So far , it works on all the hardware I 've tried it on - as old as the original Athlon 1 Ghz machines .
Of course , it 's kinda slow on that machine , but it WORKS.Huge improvement over that Vista abortion .
Yeah , I know , lots of people thought Vista was good .
Well , it never ran right on any of my hardware , including a 2.4 Ghz dual core Opteron with 8 gig of memory .
Phhht.Whatever - people who abuse their mod points like this are total asses , with no life .
Screw 'em .
Someone with a big stick needs to beat the Slashdot staff til they add new mods .
Simple " Agree " and " Disagree " buttons , like has often been suggested should solve the problem .
For that matter , those two buttons could be seperate from the rest of the mods - everyone has them all the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is plenty of trolling.
And abuse of mod points.I happen to think you're right.
I'm anti-Microsoft, but honesty makes me say that Win 7 is decent.
So far, it works on all the hardware I've tried it on - as old as the original Athlon 1 Ghz machines.
Of course, it's kinda slow on that machine, but it WORKS.Huge improvement over that Vista abortion.
Yeah, I know, lots of people thought Vista was good.
Well, it never ran right on any of my hardware, including a 2.4 Ghz dual core Opteron with 8 gig of memory.
Phhht.Whatever - people who abuse their mod points like this are total asses, with no life.
Screw 'em.
Someone with a big stick needs to beat the Slashdot staff til they add new mods.
Simple "Agree" and "Disagree" buttons, like has often been suggested should solve the problem.
For that matter, those two buttons could be seperate from the rest of the mods - everyone has them all the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834893</id>
	<title>The real process</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256225100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>CEO: We can make a great product, or we can ship that pig for free right now and make some M*F*'in money off of dopes who don't know it's not better.  Also, anyone who picks the first choice is fired.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>CEO : We can make a great product , or we can ship that pig for free right now and make some M * F * 'in money off of dopes who do n't know it 's not better .
Also , anyone who picks the first choice is fired .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CEO: We can make a great product, or we can ship that pig for free right now and make some M*F*'in money off of dopes who don't know it's not better.
Also, anyone who picks the first choice is fired.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29845875</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256311740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You should have a good imagination. I like it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You should have a good imagination .
I like it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should have a good imagination.
I like it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835981</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1256229900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>this is one of the most perfect analogies i've ever seen. personal experience, perhaps?</htmltext>
<tokenext>this is one of the most perfect analogies i 've ever seen .
personal experience , perhaps ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is one of the most perfect analogies i've ever seen.
personal experience, perhaps?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839487</id>
	<title>You know what...</title>
	<author>tool462</author>
	<datestamp>1256202480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're damn right I changed.</p><p>We met when we were young.  Everything was new and exciting.  Neither of us really knew what we were doing, but we were willing to try just about anything.  And that was okay--it was just the two of us.  I felt safe experimenting with you, as we could just start over if things got too scary.  But after a while, this just wasn't good enough for you.  You wanted us to start hooking up with others.  I know you called it "networking", but you and I both know that was a thinly veiled euphemism.  The things you had me do are too horrible to mention.  You wouldn't even use protection.  Then after you were done using me, you'd leave me crying on the floor, desperately trying to mend myself and restore some dignity.  And I know in some ways it was my fault.  I shouldn't have let you do anything you wanted to me.  I should have set up boundaries.  I should have saved some part of myself for me only.  But I was too desperate to be loved.  I needed you.</p><p>In time, you grew less interested in me.  I'd try new things to keep you around.  A new haircut, a new diet.  You'd make cruel jokes about bloat and putting lipstick on a pig.  You weren't interested in ME anymore.  I was just a means to an end.  You'd spend less and less time with me.  Then you got that new job, and you met that other girl, Lynn.  Sure, she wasn't as attractive, but she was more reliable.  You could understand her and felt safe with her.  I'd be lucky to see you for a few hours on the weekend.</p><p>You started making more money and started hanging out with all new friends.  Suddenly I was just trailer trash to you.  The final straw was when you brought another girl home, and left me on the curb.  You said she was easier.  I was just too much maintenance.  Sorry pal, but I saw the price tag on that ring you bought her.  That doesn't seem like low maintenance to me.  But like a fool I kept trying to win you back.  I'd dress just like her.  I'd try to act like her.  But somehow you knew I was the same person underneath.</p><p>Well, I've been on my own now for a while.  I've had some time to think, to grow, to become my own person.  I'm only the same in that my past experiences have made me who I am today.  I still want you back, but I no longer trust you completely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're damn right I changed.We met when we were young .
Everything was new and exciting .
Neither of us really knew what we were doing , but we were willing to try just about anything .
And that was okay--it was just the two of us .
I felt safe experimenting with you , as we could just start over if things got too scary .
But after a while , this just was n't good enough for you .
You wanted us to start hooking up with others .
I know you called it " networking " , but you and I both know that was a thinly veiled euphemism .
The things you had me do are too horrible to mention .
You would n't even use protection .
Then after you were done using me , you 'd leave me crying on the floor , desperately trying to mend myself and restore some dignity .
And I know in some ways it was my fault .
I should n't have let you do anything you wanted to me .
I should have set up boundaries .
I should have saved some part of myself for me only .
But I was too desperate to be loved .
I needed you.In time , you grew less interested in me .
I 'd try new things to keep you around .
A new haircut , a new diet .
You 'd make cruel jokes about bloat and putting lipstick on a pig .
You were n't interested in ME anymore .
I was just a means to an end .
You 'd spend less and less time with me .
Then you got that new job , and you met that other girl , Lynn .
Sure , she was n't as attractive , but she was more reliable .
You could understand her and felt safe with her .
I 'd be lucky to see you for a few hours on the weekend.You started making more money and started hanging out with all new friends .
Suddenly I was just trailer trash to you .
The final straw was when you brought another girl home , and left me on the curb .
You said she was easier .
I was just too much maintenance .
Sorry pal , but I saw the price tag on that ring you bought her .
That does n't seem like low maintenance to me .
But like a fool I kept trying to win you back .
I 'd dress just like her .
I 'd try to act like her .
But somehow you knew I was the same person underneath.Well , I 've been on my own now for a while .
I 've had some time to think , to grow , to become my own person .
I 'm only the same in that my past experiences have made me who I am today .
I still want you back , but I no longer trust you completely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're damn right I changed.We met when we were young.
Everything was new and exciting.
Neither of us really knew what we were doing, but we were willing to try just about anything.
And that was okay--it was just the two of us.
I felt safe experimenting with you, as we could just start over if things got too scary.
But after a while, this just wasn't good enough for you.
You wanted us to start hooking up with others.
I know you called it "networking", but you and I both know that was a thinly veiled euphemism.
The things you had me do are too horrible to mention.
You wouldn't even use protection.
Then after you were done using me, you'd leave me crying on the floor, desperately trying to mend myself and restore some dignity.
And I know in some ways it was my fault.
I shouldn't have let you do anything you wanted to me.
I should have set up boundaries.
I should have saved some part of myself for me only.
But I was too desperate to be loved.
I needed you.In time, you grew less interested in me.
I'd try new things to keep you around.
A new haircut, a new diet.
You'd make cruel jokes about bloat and putting lipstick on a pig.
You weren't interested in ME anymore.
I was just a means to an end.
You'd spend less and less time with me.
Then you got that new job, and you met that other girl, Lynn.
Sure, she wasn't as attractive, but she was more reliable.
You could understand her and felt safe with her.
I'd be lucky to see you for a few hours on the weekend.You started making more money and started hanging out with all new friends.
Suddenly I was just trailer trash to you.
The final straw was when you brought another girl home, and left me on the curb.
You said she was easier.
I was just too much maintenance.
Sorry pal, but I saw the price tag on that ring you bought her.
That doesn't seem like low maintenance to me.
But like a fool I kept trying to win you back.
I'd dress just like her.
I'd try to act like her.
But somehow you knew I was the same person underneath.Well, I've been on my own now for a while.
I've had some time to think, to grow, to become my own person.
I'm only the same in that my past experiences have made me who I am today.
I still want you back, but I no longer trust you completely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29843455</id>
	<title>Doughnut cushion</title>
	<author>CuteSteveJobs</author>
	<datestamp>1256330280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; Engineers Tell How Feedback Shaped Windows 7<br>
<br>
If feedback was truly used Bill Gates wouldn't be able to sit down right now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Engineers Tell How Feedback Shaped Windows 7 If feedback was truly used Bill Gates would n't be able to sit down right now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Engineers Tell How Feedback Shaped Windows 7

If feedback was truly used Bill Gates wouldn't be able to sit down right now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838393</id>
	<title>Amen!</title>
	<author>tacokill</author>
	<datestamp>1256240040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am astounded at how bad file explorer is in Vista.   That single program is probably the reason I have not "upgraded" yet.   I use file explorer all the time so I am especially sensitive to this change.
<br>
<br>
I will never understand how file explorer gets WORSE as you go higher in releases.  How is that possible?!?!  Is there somekind of grand MSFT strategy to wean people from file explorer entirely?   I just don't understand a computer operating system that does not allow easy navigation of its file and folder structure.
<br>
<br>
Note, I am not saying everyone is like me.  Rather, I am saying there are enough "me's" out there that this could not have gone unnoticed at MSFT.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am astounded at how bad file explorer is in Vista .
That single program is probably the reason I have not " upgraded " yet .
I use file explorer all the time so I am especially sensitive to this change .
I will never understand how file explorer gets WORSE as you go higher in releases .
How is that possible ? ! ? !
Is there somekind of grand MSFT strategy to wean people from file explorer entirely ?
I just do n't understand a computer operating system that does not allow easy navigation of its file and folder structure .
Note , I am not saying everyone is like me .
Rather , I am saying there are enough " me 's " out there that this could not have gone unnoticed at MSFT .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am astounded at how bad file explorer is in Vista.
That single program is probably the reason I have not "upgraded" yet.
I use file explorer all the time so I am especially sensitive to this change.
I will never understand how file explorer gets WORSE as you go higher in releases.
How is that possible?!?!
Is there somekind of grand MSFT strategy to wean people from file explorer entirely?
I just don't understand a computer operating system that does not allow easy navigation of its file and folder structure.
Note, I am not saying everyone is like me.
Rather, I am saying there are enough "me's" out there that this could not have gone unnoticed at MSFT.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835321</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836401</id>
	<title>Windows 7's advantage is that it's available</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1256231880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I yet have to find someone who can show me what it brings me, over XP, that is worth paying 100+ EUR for.</p></div><p>You've got it backwards. When you buy a new computer, you may have to pay 100+ EUR <em>extra</em> to get Windows XP on it; otherwise, you get Windows 7.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I yet have to find someone who can show me what it brings me , over XP , that is worth paying 100 + EUR for.You 've got it backwards .
When you buy a new computer , you may have to pay 100 + EUR extra to get Windows XP on it ; otherwise , you get Windows 7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I yet have to find someone who can show me what it brings me, over XP, that is worth paying 100+ EUR for.You've got it backwards.
When you buy a new computer, you may have to pay 100+ EUR extra to get Windows XP on it; otherwise, you get Windows 7.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29962946</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1257261060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My linux girlfriend is a Karmic Koala. First the fur is a bit weird but then you get used to it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My linux girlfriend is a Karmic Koala .
First the fur is a bit weird but then you get used to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My linux girlfriend is a Karmic Koala.
First the fur is a bit weird but then you get used to it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834859</id>
	<title>MS moves fast</title>
	<author>gEvil (beta)</author>
	<datestamp>1256224920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Over a decade ago, feedback for Microsoft software took place by filling out surveys on paper and floppy disks sent in to the company's headquarters. The ubiquity of the Internet has led to more feedback, faster.</i> <br>
<br>
And yet they could have used the Internet for feedback well more than a decade ago. Glad to see they've finally entered the mid-90s.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Over a decade ago , feedback for Microsoft software took place by filling out surveys on paper and floppy disks sent in to the company 's headquarters .
The ubiquity of the Internet has led to more feedback , faster .
And yet they could have used the Internet for feedback well more than a decade ago .
Glad to see they 've finally entered the mid-90s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Over a decade ago, feedback for Microsoft software took place by filling out surveys on paper and floppy disks sent in to the company's headquarters.
The ubiquity of the Internet has led to more feedback, faster.
And yet they could have used the Internet for feedback well more than a decade ago.
Glad to see they've finally entered the mid-90s.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835639</id>
	<title>Re:Mojave Experiment 2.0</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256228400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Features\_new\_to\_Windows\_7" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Features\_new\_to\_Windows\_7</a> [wikipedia.org]
<br> <br>
Oops, you're stupid.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Features \ _new \ _to \ _Windows \ _7 [ wikipedia.org ] Oops , you 're stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Features\_new\_to\_Windows\_7 [wikipedia.org]
 
Oops, you're stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839311</id>
	<title>I hope they keep copying Linux GUIs</title>
	<author>Deputy Doodah</author>
	<datestamp>1256244660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I like how they made it look like Linux (Gnome, KDE). Does anyone know if they ever got around to copying virtual desktops? <br>
The more my Linux and Windows boxes look &amp; act the same the better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like how they made it look like Linux ( Gnome , KDE ) .
Does anyone know if they ever got around to copying virtual desktops ?
The more my Linux and Windows boxes look &amp; act the same the better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like how they made it look like Linux (Gnome, KDE).
Does anyone know if they ever got around to copying virtual desktops?
The more my Linux and Windows boxes look &amp; act the same the better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29852881</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!"</title>
	<author>cia9*</author>
	<datestamp>1256301240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This post, and the subsequent one on the Mac OS/Linux girlfriend, certainly do a great job of separating men from the juveniles who wrote them.

Time for user pix, so we can see the "boys" who are willing to be this scathing about women/girls. I suspect most of them don't rate a 7.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This post , and the subsequent one on the Mac OS/Linux girlfriend , certainly do a great job of separating men from the juveniles who wrote them .
Time for user pix , so we can see the " boys " who are willing to be this scathing about women/girls .
I suspect most of them do n't rate a 7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This post, and the subsequent one on the Mac OS/Linux girlfriend, certainly do a great job of separating men from the juveniles who wrote them.
Time for user pix, so we can see the "boys" who are willing to be this scathing about women/girls.
I suspect most of them don't rate a 7.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835969</id>
	<title>What an inovative ideq</title>
	<author>strangeattraction</author>
	<datestamp>1256229840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What a new idea using user feedback to improve a design:) Another Microsoft first or simply the first time for Microsoft.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What a new idea using user feedback to improve a design : ) Another Microsoft first or simply the first time for Microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a new idea using user feedback to improve a design:) Another Microsoft first or simply the first time for Microsoft.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838899</id>
	<title>Re:Let's give the devil his due</title>
	<author>fluffy99</author>
	<datestamp>1256242560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm actually not sure how this got to +4 funny.  Maybe +5 interesting?  I digress.  I've been a fan of Win2k for a long time, I used it for just about everything from gaming to my work up until XP64 and had a stable driver set.  Does Win7 have that nifty feel of Win2k?  Yes actually it does.  Even on lower end hardware it's decently snappy, and runs well.</p><p>Issues?  The biggest I've found is it's ability to lose connection to the internet on reboots.  Meaning you need to disable and reenable your network card which fixes it.  Sadly no new drivers for my card, but otherwise works fine.  I consider that a 2 on my 1-10(10 being worst) scale of crap.  Otherwise, I'm quite happy.  My XP64 machine has been up and running for a bit more than 460 days now without a reboot.  I expect that Win7 will beat that easily.</p></div><p>The biggest drawback to XP64 is the lack of drivers.  A 460 day uptime eh?  I guess you don't believe in installing critical security patches?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm actually not sure how this got to + 4 funny .
Maybe + 5 interesting ?
I digress .
I 've been a fan of Win2k for a long time , I used it for just about everything from gaming to my work up until XP64 and had a stable driver set .
Does Win7 have that nifty feel of Win2k ?
Yes actually it does .
Even on lower end hardware it 's decently snappy , and runs well.Issues ?
The biggest I 've found is it 's ability to lose connection to the internet on reboots .
Meaning you need to disable and reenable your network card which fixes it .
Sadly no new drivers for my card , but otherwise works fine .
I consider that a 2 on my 1-10 ( 10 being worst ) scale of crap .
Otherwise , I 'm quite happy .
My XP64 machine has been up and running for a bit more than 460 days now without a reboot .
I expect that Win7 will beat that easily.The biggest drawback to XP64 is the lack of drivers .
A 460 day uptime eh ?
I guess you do n't believe in installing critical security patches ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm actually not sure how this got to +4 funny.
Maybe +5 interesting?
I digress.
I've been a fan of Win2k for a long time, I used it for just about everything from gaming to my work up until XP64 and had a stable driver set.
Does Win7 have that nifty feel of Win2k?
Yes actually it does.
Even on lower end hardware it's decently snappy, and runs well.Issues?
The biggest I've found is it's ability to lose connection to the internet on reboots.
Meaning you need to disable and reenable your network card which fixes it.
Sadly no new drivers for my card, but otherwise works fine.
I consider that a 2 on my 1-10(10 being worst) scale of crap.
Otherwise, I'm quite happy.
My XP64 machine has been up and running for a bit more than 460 days now without a reboot.
I expect that Win7 will beat that easily.The biggest drawback to XP64 is the lack of drivers.
A 460 day uptime eh?
I guess you don't believe in installing critical security patches?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836343</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842763</id>
	<title>Classic start menu</title>
	<author>tokul</author>
	<datestamp>1256231220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So which moron asked to remove Classic start menu completely?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So which moron asked to remove Classic start menu completely ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So which moron asked to remove Classic start menu completely?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836129</id>
	<title>Re:Dear God...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256230500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stability (I run 7 at home and XP at work. I only restart when I get an update requiring me too; 7 requires less restarts from updates), speed (it boots up as fast as Snow Leopard for me, albeit on a faster machine than my old MacBook, but it also feels faster than XP, whether actually true or not, I am unsure), and better 64-bit support.</p><p>I run Windows 7 64-bit, and I have zero issues. I prefer the look-and-feel, as well as the random feature improvements, such as their applications stacking in the taskbar, as well as the peak feature to select the actual window I want.  I also only have 2 GB of RAM, which I had in my XP machine before it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stability ( I run 7 at home and XP at work .
I only restart when I get an update requiring me too ; 7 requires less restarts from updates ) , speed ( it boots up as fast as Snow Leopard for me , albeit on a faster machine than my old MacBook , but it also feels faster than XP , whether actually true or not , I am unsure ) , and better 64-bit support.I run Windows 7 64-bit , and I have zero issues .
I prefer the look-and-feel , as well as the random feature improvements , such as their applications stacking in the taskbar , as well as the peak feature to select the actual window I want .
I also only have 2 GB of RAM , which I had in my XP machine before it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stability (I run 7 at home and XP at work.
I only restart when I get an update requiring me too; 7 requires less restarts from updates), speed (it boots up as fast as Snow Leopard for me, albeit on a faster machine than my old MacBook, but it also feels faster than XP, whether actually true or not, I am unsure), and better 64-bit support.I run Windows 7 64-bit, and I have zero issues.
I prefer the look-and-feel, as well as the random feature improvements, such as their applications stacking in the taskbar, as well as the peak feature to select the actual window I want.
I also only have 2 GB of RAM, which I had in my XP machine before it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835729
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_124</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835095
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835607
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837775
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_126</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835739
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837731
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29845403
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839417
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836403
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835785
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_125</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29854087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_116</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835981
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837817
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29845171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844825
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29841103
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838341
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835321
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840971
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835031
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836375
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839529
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_108</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29847967
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836383
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_111</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836739
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840397
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835847
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840559
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836097
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835215
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836063
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837233
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839421
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835847
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842129
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835727
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_114</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29942404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838113
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844479
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835563
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834797
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834885
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834803
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838333
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835099
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_133</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835321
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844555
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836451
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29851383
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_106</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29846079
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29845875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840969
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29843001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837539
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_123</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838981
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29928381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839641
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842109
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_130</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835037
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834797
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836031
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837905
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835639
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29962946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835847
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_128</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835785
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_131</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835071
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836055
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_119</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835367
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29847657
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29850825
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_122</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837211
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_118</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836063
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837233
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837007
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_109</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_121</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835321
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839543
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835781
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842727
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_112</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835321
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29841543
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839487
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838365
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29852881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835203
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836401
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29847907
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835321
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29854313
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842059
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835275
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_115</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_117</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835557
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834809
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835355
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837867
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_120</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836891
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29843219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836121
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_134</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836129
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838953
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_107</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836829
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_110</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835475
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835785
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836729
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838899
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835713
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836877
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29843793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838057
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835321
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838393
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836717
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_113</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838461
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834803
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_127</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29841903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_129</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835327
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835449
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_132</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838091
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835177
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835321
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836387
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840225
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837181
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844279
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836491
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835953
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_22_1218232_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835827
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834889
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837181
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835367
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838885
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835847
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840559
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842129
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835321
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836387
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29854313
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839543
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844555
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840971
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29841543
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838393
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835487
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835485
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838113
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838901
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839243
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840397
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835171
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837653
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844977
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837731
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836097
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835573
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835475
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836129
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837793
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838057
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840969
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835939
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835607
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837775
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29841103
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836401
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29847907
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836383
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834803
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838333
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837711
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836063
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837233
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839421
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838303
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834905
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835037
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835339
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835215
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835031
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835275
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835097
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836055
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835327
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835203
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835449
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835557
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836121
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836739
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838341
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836381
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837289
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834831
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836343
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838899
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840225
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838811
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29841903
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29851383
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835345
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837905
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836877
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836685
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834869
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835095
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842059
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836451
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835785
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839001
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837069
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836729
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834967
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837573
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835161
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836951
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835071
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836891
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835099
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835177
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835563
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835639
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835953
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836491
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834771
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838307
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29845171
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29843001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838091
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837735
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842109
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844279
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834809
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835355
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835259
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839715
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29845875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29845403
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29843793
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836403
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837007
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835981
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838755
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835841
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836857
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838953
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838461
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839641
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839487
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835739
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844825
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835865
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29843219
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29852881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29847657
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837867
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842747
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29850825
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29928381
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836375
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839529
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835713
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836829
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29840929
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29847967
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838365
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837783
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837309
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844479
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29846079
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29962946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29839417
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835827
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29854087
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837539
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29942404
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835781
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29842727
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834775
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835137
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836717
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836935
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838981
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835727
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837043
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29835729
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29844249
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29837817
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_22_1218232.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834797
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29834885
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29838249
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_22_1218232.29836031
</commentlist>
</conversation>
