<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_21_239247</id>
	<title>Google To Take On iTunes?</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1256139960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>'Multiple sources say Google is preparing to <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/\_yahoo/story/10614686/1/google-audio-launch-imminent-report.html?cm\_ven=YAHOO&amp;cm\_cat=FREE&amp;cm\_ite=NA">launch Google Audio</a>. According to people familiar with the matter, Google has been securing content from record companies. Is Google about to go head-to-head with Apple's iTunes?'</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes 'Multiple sources say Google is preparing to launch Google Audio .
According to people familiar with the matter , Google has been securing content from record companies .
Is Google about to go head-to-head with Apple 's iTunes ?
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes 'Multiple sources say Google is preparing to launch Google Audio.
According to people familiar with the matter, Google has been securing content from record companies.
Is Google about to go head-to-head with Apple's iTunes?
'</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831839</id>
	<title>eh....</title>
	<author>djupedal</author>
	<datestamp>1256145480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; <i>"According to people familiar with the matter"</i>
<br>
<br>
Which in today's terms means 'we made this whole thing up' just to fill a gap in the so-called news...</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; " According to people familiar with the matter " Which in today 's terms means 'we made this whole thing up ' just to fill a gap in the so-called news.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; "According to people familiar with the matter"


Which in today's terms means 'we made this whole thing up' just to fill a gap in the so-called news...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834001</id>
	<title>Re:Its a Fractal</title>
	<author>ElectricTurtle</author>
	<datestamp>1256218800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apple's market share is increasing because Microsoft's is decreasing. Now is the perfect time for Google to swoop in and get market share from both of them with a broad, integrated set of competing products. This is exactly what they are doing, challenging IE (and Safari) with Chrome, iPhone (and Windows Mobile) with Android, iTMS with Audio, etc. Recessions are when people with resources have the best opportunities to lay the foundations for growth in the next cycle, and Google seems to be hatching all its eggs at the right time and in the right way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple 's market share is increasing because Microsoft 's is decreasing .
Now is the perfect time for Google to swoop in and get market share from both of them with a broad , integrated set of competing products .
This is exactly what they are doing , challenging IE ( and Safari ) with Chrome , iPhone ( and Windows Mobile ) with Android , iTMS with Audio , etc .
Recessions are when people with resources have the best opportunities to lay the foundations for growth in the next cycle , and Google seems to be hatching all its eggs at the right time and in the right way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple's market share is increasing because Microsoft's is decreasing.
Now is the perfect time for Google to swoop in and get market share from both of them with a broad, integrated set of competing products.
This is exactly what they are doing, challenging IE (and Safari) with Chrome, iPhone (and Windows Mobile) with Android, iTMS with Audio, etc.
Recessions are when people with resources have the best opportunities to lay the foundations for growth in the next cycle, and Google seems to be hatching all its eggs at the right time and in the right way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831817</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831911</id>
	<title>Re:What about the player?</title>
	<author>jeffstar</author>
	<datestamp>1256146620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>an alternative to itunes would be great, but it would have to sync non jailbroken iphones ipod touch / whatever comes next and apple clearly doesn't want any program other than itunes doing that. see palm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>an alternative to itunes would be great , but it would have to sync non jailbroken iphones ipod touch / whatever comes next and apple clearly does n't want any program other than itunes doing that .
see palm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>an alternative to itunes would be great, but it would have to sync non jailbroken iphones ipod touch / whatever comes next and apple clearly doesn't want any program other than itunes doing that.
see palm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29837463</id>
	<title>Re:What about the player?</title>
	<author>fast turtle</author>
	<datestamp>1256236200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well as a business owner, I can not allow Picassa to be installed on any of the computers due to potential security flaws. The biggest issue I have with Picassa is the fact that it needs to install with Admin Privelages and that it indexes all files on the system that as an Admin privelaged app, it can. Sorry but the only files Picassa should be indexing are the shared/public pictures and the individual my picture folders. There is absolutely no reason it needs to index My Documents even if there are images placed in that locations. In fact, now that I'm running Win7, I'm reevaluating the installation of Google Desktop Search as it's simply duplicating the Windows Search functionality that I hate to say is actually better then Google in regards to my usage/need patterns.</p><p>An example of the difference in effectiveness is the fact that I have a document archive in excess of 300K files. Using a single search term, Google only located 50K+ files with the term in them, while Windows located all 150K+ files that had the term in them. This included the many plain text files scattered throughout various folders where the term was used in discussion or referenced. When Google only finds 1/3 of the files using a single term, I have to wonder if it is worth keeping it around due to potential security holes and the possibility of inadvertentyly sharing data with Google that is required to be kept private under Federal Rules and Regs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well as a business owner , I can not allow Picassa to be installed on any of the computers due to potential security flaws .
The biggest issue I have with Picassa is the fact that it needs to install with Admin Privelages and that it indexes all files on the system that as an Admin privelaged app , it can .
Sorry but the only files Picassa should be indexing are the shared/public pictures and the individual my picture folders .
There is absolutely no reason it needs to index My Documents even if there are images placed in that locations .
In fact , now that I 'm running Win7 , I 'm reevaluating the installation of Google Desktop Search as it 's simply duplicating the Windows Search functionality that I hate to say is actually better then Google in regards to my usage/need patterns.An example of the difference in effectiveness is the fact that I have a document archive in excess of 300K files .
Using a single search term , Google only located 50K + files with the term in them , while Windows located all 150K + files that had the term in them .
This included the many plain text files scattered throughout various folders where the term was used in discussion or referenced .
When Google only finds 1/3 of the files using a single term , I have to wonder if it is worth keeping it around due to potential security holes and the possibility of inadvertentyly sharing data with Google that is required to be kept private under Federal Rules and Regs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well as a business owner, I can not allow Picassa to be installed on any of the computers due to potential security flaws.
The biggest issue I have with Picassa is the fact that it needs to install with Admin Privelages and that it indexes all files on the system that as an Admin privelaged app, it can.
Sorry but the only files Picassa should be indexing are the shared/public pictures and the individual my picture folders.
There is absolutely no reason it needs to index My Documents even if there are images placed in that locations.
In fact, now that I'm running Win7, I'm reevaluating the installation of Google Desktop Search as it's simply duplicating the Windows Search functionality that I hate to say is actually better then Google in regards to my usage/need patterns.An example of the difference in effectiveness is the fact that I have a document archive in excess of 300K files.
Using a single search term, Google only located 50K+ files with the term in them, while Windows located all 150K+ files that had the term in them.
This included the many plain text files scattered throughout various folders where the term was used in discussion or referenced.
When Google only finds 1/3 of the files using a single term, I have to wonder if it is worth keeping it around due to potential security holes and the possibility of inadvertentyly sharing data with Google that is required to be kept private under Federal Rules and Regs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29836999</id>
	<title>Re:Spotify not ITunes will be the big competitor</title>
	<author>hazydave</author>
	<datestamp>1256234220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That sounds so much cooler than saying "2/3 of the people in Chicago have iTunes account".  But not quite as cool as pointing out, if iTunes users had their own country, it would be around the size of Mexico, Japan, or Russia (numbers very a bit, depending on the source).</p><p>Spotify is too limited, anyway... it could work on an iPhone, but not an iPod, at least not without a Wifi connection.. and, well, Apple's approval. We already have Pandora here, which I would consider a better kind of technology for streaming audio (eg, like radio, it introduces music I might not know, but based on expressed preferences, I'm likely to like).</p><p>It's going to take a phenomenon like Google and Android, I suspect, to put a real dent in Apple's iPhone/iPod/iTunes market. And that's all based on purchases, not so much rentals or streaming. Apple's stuff doesn't change much anymore.. that's a pretty clear indication you're seeing a mature market. You need something profound to shake that up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That sounds so much cooler than saying " 2/3 of the people in Chicago have iTunes account " .
But not quite as cool as pointing out , if iTunes users had their own country , it would be around the size of Mexico , Japan , or Russia ( numbers very a bit , depending on the source ) .Spotify is too limited , anyway... it could work on an iPhone , but not an iPod , at least not without a Wifi connection.. and , well , Apple 's approval .
We already have Pandora here , which I would consider a better kind of technology for streaming audio ( eg , like radio , it introduces music I might not know , but based on expressed preferences , I 'm likely to like ) .It 's going to take a phenomenon like Google and Android , I suspect , to put a real dent in Apple 's iPhone/iPod/iTunes market .
And that 's all based on purchases , not so much rentals or streaming .
Apple 's stuff does n't change much anymore.. that 's a pretty clear indication you 're seeing a mature market .
You need something profound to shake that up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That sounds so much cooler than saying "2/3 of the people in Chicago have iTunes account".
But not quite as cool as pointing out, if iTunes users had their own country, it would be around the size of Mexico, Japan, or Russia (numbers very a bit, depending on the source).Spotify is too limited, anyway... it could work on an iPhone, but not an iPod, at least not without a Wifi connection.. and, well, Apple's approval.
We already have Pandora here, which I would consider a better kind of technology for streaming audio (eg, like radio, it introduces music I might not know, but based on expressed preferences, I'm likely to like).It's going to take a phenomenon like Google and Android, I suspect, to put a real dent in Apple's iPhone/iPod/iTunes market.
And that's all based on purchases, not so much rentals or streaming.
Apple's stuff doesn't change much anymore.. that's a pretty clear indication you're seeing a mature market.
You need something profound to shake that up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834379</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously - is Google innovative at all?</title>
	<author>bravecanadian</author>
	<datestamp>1256221380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I put forward that you cannot survive a year without touching/using a google technology.  If you truely believe google tech is mediocre.. go a year without google search/mail/reader/youtube/maps/docs/books/code/chrome/images/news/android and of course.. no clicking google ads.</p><p>You can't be serious.</p><p>I didn't realize the dawn of humanity was 1998 when Google came around.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I put forward that you can not survive a year without touching/using a google technology .
If you truely believe google tech is mediocre.. go a year without google search/mail/reader/youtube/maps/docs/books/code/chrome/images/news/android and of course.. no clicking google ads.You ca n't be serious.I did n't realize the dawn of humanity was 1998 when Google came around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I put forward that you cannot survive a year without touching/using a google technology.
If you truely believe google tech is mediocre.. go a year without google search/mail/reader/youtube/maps/docs/books/code/chrome/images/news/android and of course.. no clicking google ads.You can't be serious.I didn't realize the dawn of humanity was 1998 when Google came around.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833797</id>
	<title>Re:Spotify not ITunes will be the big competitor</title>
	<author>bkr1\_2k</author>
	<datestamp>1256217180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>In short, they've made their "free" (ad-supported) service too good.</i></p><p>Which is exactly why it would be a good fit for Google.  The ad-support is where Google makes its money, primarily, so it makes sense.  I'm sure if Google would purchase them, they'd be able to fix the poorly directed ad thing very quickly, as I've noticed a reasonably good correlation between the ads presented to me on gmail (when I actually log in via the web rather than a pop reader) and what I'm reading/discussing at the time.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In short , they 've made their " free " ( ad-supported ) service too good.Which is exactly why it would be a good fit for Google .
The ad-support is where Google makes its money , primarily , so it makes sense .
I 'm sure if Google would purchase them , they 'd be able to fix the poorly directed ad thing very quickly , as I 've noticed a reasonably good correlation between the ads presented to me on gmail ( when I actually log in via the web rather than a pop reader ) and what I 'm reading/discussing at the time .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>In short, they've made their "free" (ad-supported) service too good.Which is exactly why it would be a good fit for Google.
The ad-support is where Google makes its money, primarily, so it makes sense.
I'm sure if Google would purchase them, they'd be able to fix the poorly directed ad thing very quickly, as I've noticed a reasonably good correlation between the ads presented to me on gmail (when I actually log in via the web rather than a pop reader) and what I'm reading/discussing at the time.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833103</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835489</id>
	<title>Re:What about the player?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256227920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>+1 I love mpd.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>+ 1 I love mpd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+1 I love mpd.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835909</id>
	<title>Re:Spotify not ITunes will be the big competitor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256229600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Daniel Ek, is that you?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Daniel Ek , is that you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Daniel Ek, is that you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831731</id>
	<title>whats the point?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256144220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>lame</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lame</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lame</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29842227</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously - is Google innovative at all?</title>
	<author>UnknownSoldier</author>
	<datestamp>1256224080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; I put forward that you cannot survive a year without touching/using a google technology.</p><p>It might be painful, but with Bing &amp; Yahoo that is relatively easy.</p><p>&gt; but why did google become so popular? It was great and very minimal.</p><p>Yes as pic confirms.<br><a href="http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/443/yahoovsgoogle1996to2005ys4.png" title="imageshack.us" rel="nofollow">http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/443/yahoovsgoogle1996to2005ys4.png</a> [imageshack.us]</p><p>However, that is only 50\% of the solution.  Excite (before it became a web portal), and Altavista was also minimal, but google's search engine basically blew everyone else out of the water.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I put forward that you can not survive a year without touching/using a google technology.It might be painful , but with Bing &amp; Yahoo that is relatively easy. &gt; but why did google become so popular ?
It was great and very minimal.Yes as pic confirms.http : //img361.imageshack.us/img361/443/yahoovsgoogle1996to2005ys4.png [ imageshack.us ] However , that is only 50 \ % of the solution .
Excite ( before it became a web portal ) , and Altavista was also minimal , but google 's search engine basically blew everyone else out of the water .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I put forward that you cannot survive a year without touching/using a google technology.It might be painful, but with Bing &amp; Yahoo that is relatively easy.&gt; but why did google become so popular?
It was great and very minimal.Yes as pic confirms.http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/443/yahoovsgoogle1996to2005ys4.png [imageshack.us]However, that is only 50\% of the solution.
Excite (before it became a web portal), and Altavista was also minimal, but google's search engine basically blew everyone else out of the water.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832981</id>
	<title>One Big Problem:</title>
	<author>bezenek</author>
	<datestamp>1256206500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Many of the buyers in the primary demographic will hear, "Google Audio," and not realize Google is selling music.

-Todd</htmltext>
<tokenext>Many of the buyers in the primary demographic will hear , " Google Audio , " and not realize Google is selling music .
-Todd</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many of the buyers in the primary demographic will hear, "Google Audio," and not realize Google is selling music.
-Todd</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831921</id>
	<title>Re:Its a Fractal</title>
	<author>GoochOwnsYou</author>
	<datestamp>1256146800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Yes, the Apple devices will be pretty</p> </div><p>Maybe its just personal taste but I find the HTC Magic a better looking device than the iPhone.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , the Apple devices will be pretty Maybe its just personal taste but I find the HTC Magic a better looking device than the iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Yes, the Apple devices will be pretty Maybe its just personal taste but I find the HTC Magic a better looking device than the iPhone.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29836965</id>
	<title>Wasn't there a Disney DRM this yesterday?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256234160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If there's a DRM ecosystem, could it be related to <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/10/21/1941217/Disney-Close-To-Unveiling-New-DVD-Killer" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">this</a> [slashdot.org]...!?#\%$!</htmltext>
<tokenext>If there 's a DRM ecosystem , could it be related to this [ slashdot.org ] ... !
? # \ % $ !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If there's a DRM ecosystem, could it be related to this [slashdot.org]...!
?#\%$!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832471</id>
	<title>Re:Why audio?</title>
	<author>Saint Fnordius</author>
	<datestamp>1256155140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you think about it and read the reports, it seems as if this is exactly what Google is doing: sticking to search. The difference is that this time it's about searching for songs to download and/or purchase.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you think about it and read the reports , it seems as if this is exactly what Google is doing : sticking to search .
The difference is that this time it 's about searching for songs to download and/or purchase .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you think about it and read the reports, it seems as if this is exactly what Google is doing: sticking to search.
The difference is that this time it's about searching for songs to download and/or purchase.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835877</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously - is Google innovative at all?</title>
	<author>kwijebo</author>
	<datestamp>1256229480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you kidding? The only Google services you mention I ever use are search and maps.  Both have perfectly reasonable alternatives.</p><p>Do you actually click on google ads? Why?</p><p>Now, I'm not arguing Google isn't innovative.  They innovate, they just don't ever finish anything (except search).</p><p>Success is 5\% inspiriation, 95\% perspiration.  Google has clearly hired inspired developers, I've never been convinced they've figured out how to focus most of those developers on things that make money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you kidding ?
The only Google services you mention I ever use are search and maps .
Both have perfectly reasonable alternatives.Do you actually click on google ads ?
Why ? Now , I 'm not arguing Google is n't innovative .
They innovate , they just do n't ever finish anything ( except search ) .Success is 5 \ % inspiriation , 95 \ % perspiration .
Google has clearly hired inspired developers , I 've never been convinced they 've figured out how to focus most of those developers on things that make money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you kidding?
The only Google services you mention I ever use are search and maps.
Both have perfectly reasonable alternatives.Do you actually click on google ads?
Why?Now, I'm not arguing Google isn't innovative.
They innovate, they just don't ever finish anything (except search).Success is 5\% inspiriation, 95\% perspiration.
Google has clearly hired inspired developers, I've never been convinced they've figured out how to focus most of those developers on things that make money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29836245</id>
	<title>Re:WSJ reports that it's NOT competition for iTune</title>
	<author>bcrowell</author>
	<datestamp>1256231100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The Wall Street Journal's story says that the plan will allow people to buy FROM iTunes and Amazon.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Which is too bad, because more competition would have been really helpful, especially for linux users. I currently buy my music on amazon, but their linux support is extremely buggy. To buy an album (as opposed to individual songs), you have to use a special downloader app they provide. To their credit, they do provide a linux version, but their whole setup is just lame and buggy. When I've called with problems, the Indian tech support people always claimed that there's no support for anything but Windows and IE (even though amazon's web site offers specific information and software for linux). Right now, amazon probably has zero incentive to improve the situation. But if there was someone else willing to sell music to linux users, amazon would probably say to themselves, "Hey, linux users may only be 0.5\% of our customers, but 0.5\% is still millions of dollars, and now that we've got competition we should really get our act together."
</p><p>
Also, although I buy my music in mp3 format, a lot of people prefer less lossy formats. Right now, your only option is iTunes if you don't want mp3. Geographical restrictions are another issue that would probably get fixed if there were more competition.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Wall Street Journal 's story says that the plan will allow people to buy FROM iTunes and Amazon .
Which is too bad , because more competition would have been really helpful , especially for linux users .
I currently buy my music on amazon , but their linux support is extremely buggy .
To buy an album ( as opposed to individual songs ) , you have to use a special downloader app they provide .
To their credit , they do provide a linux version , but their whole setup is just lame and buggy .
When I 've called with problems , the Indian tech support people always claimed that there 's no support for anything but Windows and IE ( even though amazon 's web site offers specific information and software for linux ) .
Right now , amazon probably has zero incentive to improve the situation .
But if there was someone else willing to sell music to linux users , amazon would probably say to themselves , " Hey , linux users may only be 0.5 \ % of our customers , but 0.5 \ % is still millions of dollars , and now that we 've got competition we should really get our act together .
" Also , although I buy my music in mp3 format , a lot of people prefer less lossy formats .
Right now , your only option is iTunes if you do n't want mp3 .
Geographical restrictions are another issue that would probably get fixed if there were more competition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Wall Street Journal's story says that the plan will allow people to buy FROM iTunes and Amazon.
Which is too bad, because more competition would have been really helpful, especially for linux users.
I currently buy my music on amazon, but their linux support is extremely buggy.
To buy an album (as opposed to individual songs), you have to use a special downloader app they provide.
To their credit, they do provide a linux version, but their whole setup is just lame and buggy.
When I've called with problems, the Indian tech support people always claimed that there's no support for anything but Windows and IE (even though amazon's web site offers specific information and software for linux).
Right now, amazon probably has zero incentive to improve the situation.
But if there was someone else willing to sell music to linux users, amazon would probably say to themselves, "Hey, linux users may only be 0.5\% of our customers, but 0.5\% is still millions of dollars, and now that we've got competition we should really get our act together.
"

Also, although I buy my music in mp3 format, a lot of people prefer less lossy formats.
Right now, your only option is iTunes if you don't want mp3.
Geographical restrictions are another issue that would probably get fixed if there were more competition.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725</id>
	<title>What about the player?</title>
	<author>scottblascocomposer</author>
	<datestamp>1256144160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd be thrilled if Google could do a music player analogue of Picasa. I've always hated iPhoto, and Picasa is great. A similar product to displace iTunes would be incredibly welcome (and yes, I've tried Songbird; maybe someday, but it's not there yet).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be thrilled if Google could do a music player analogue of Picasa .
I 've always hated iPhoto , and Picasa is great .
A similar product to displace iTunes would be incredibly welcome ( and yes , I 've tried Songbird ; maybe someday , but it 's not there yet ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd be thrilled if Google could do a music player analogue of Picasa.
I've always hated iPhoto, and Picasa is great.
A similar product to displace iTunes would be incredibly welcome (and yes, I've tried Songbird; maybe someday, but it's not there yet).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835531</id>
	<title>Please save us Google!</title>
	<author>grking</author>
	<datestamp>1256228040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm fed up of Apple's restrictive and prescriptive dictating of how I can and can't use my own products.  I like my iPod Classic and I like my iPhone, but I can't use iTunes because I run Linux, and Apple of course say that is forbidden.</p><p>I've been using <a href="http://www.gtkpod.org/about.html" title="gtkpod.org" rel="nofollow">gtkpod</a> [gtkpod.org] to transfer music to the iPod Classic, but Apple have gone one extra step to ensure I can't use my iPhone that way under Linux.  So if I use an OS Apple haven't rubber stamped I can't transfer music to my own phone.  Thanks.</p><p>I'm looking forward to the day when Google pull all this together into an open Android device capable of replacing the iPhone/iPod.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm fed up of Apple 's restrictive and prescriptive dictating of how I can and ca n't use my own products .
I like my iPod Classic and I like my iPhone , but I ca n't use iTunes because I run Linux , and Apple of course say that is forbidden.I 've been using gtkpod [ gtkpod.org ] to transfer music to the iPod Classic , but Apple have gone one extra step to ensure I ca n't use my iPhone that way under Linux .
So if I use an OS Apple have n't rubber stamped I ca n't transfer music to my own phone .
Thanks.I 'm looking forward to the day when Google pull all this together into an open Android device capable of replacing the iPhone/iPod .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm fed up of Apple's restrictive and prescriptive dictating of how I can and can't use my own products.
I like my iPod Classic and I like my iPhone, but I can't use iTunes because I run Linux, and Apple of course say that is forbidden.I've been using gtkpod [gtkpod.org] to transfer music to the iPod Classic, but Apple have gone one extra step to ensure I can't use my iPhone that way under Linux.
So if I use an OS Apple haven't rubber stamped I can't transfer music to my own phone.
Thanks.I'm looking forward to the day when Google pull all this together into an open Android device capable of replacing the iPhone/iPod.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29858981</id>
	<title>Re:What about the player?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1256417160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A similar product to displace iTunes would be incredibly welcome</p></div><p>You mean, like AmaroK? I have seen iTunes on my brother's Mac, and it is pretty similar to AmaroK. But it lacks many features.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A similar product to displace iTunes would be incredibly welcomeYou mean , like AmaroK ?
I have seen iTunes on my brother 's Mac , and it is pretty similar to AmaroK .
But it lacks many features .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A similar product to displace iTunes would be incredibly welcomeYou mean, like AmaroK?
I have seen iTunes on my brother's Mac, and it is pretty similar to AmaroK.
But it lacks many features.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833095</id>
	<title>Sensational headlines vs reality</title>
	<author>chabotc</author>
	<datestamp>1256207820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another example of "Sensational headlines sells", before this<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./ post even went live more details became available that in fact this is about adding music to the search results and that the songs found can be played through iLike, last.fm, lala, etc.. and offer 'Click to buy' links to iTunes and Amazon.</p><p>So no, Google is not taking on iTunes or Amazon, in fact it will help sell their music.</p><p>That doesn't mean however this isn't a very nifty feature<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Screenshots and more info are available at:<br><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/21/google-to-partner-with-ilike-and-lala-for-new-music-service/" title="techcrunch.com">http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/21/google-to-partner-with-ilike-and-lala-for-new-music-service/</a> [techcrunch.com]<br><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/21/google-music-service-the-screenshots/" title="techcrunch.com">http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/21/google-music-service-the-screenshots/</a> [techcrunch.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another example of " Sensational headlines sells " , before this ./ post even went live more details became available that in fact this is about adding music to the search results and that the songs found can be played through iLike , last.fm , lala , etc.. and offer 'Click to buy ' links to iTunes and Amazon.So no , Google is not taking on iTunes or Amazon , in fact it will help sell their music.That does n't mean however this is n't a very nifty feature : ) Screenshots and more info are available at : http : //www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/21/google-to-partner-with-ilike-and-lala-for-new-music-service/ [ techcrunch.com ] http : //www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/21/google-music-service-the-screenshots/ [ techcrunch.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another example of "Sensational headlines sells", before this ./ post even went live more details became available that in fact this is about adding music to the search results and that the songs found can be played through iLike, last.fm, lala, etc.. and offer 'Click to buy' links to iTunes and Amazon.So no, Google is not taking on iTunes or Amazon, in fact it will help sell their music.That doesn't mean however this isn't a very nifty feature :)Screenshots and more info are available at:http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/21/google-to-partner-with-ilike-and-lala-for-new-music-service/ [techcrunch.com]http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/21/google-music-service-the-screenshots/ [techcrunch.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832419</id>
	<title>Re:Why audio?</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1256154360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah! Why doesn't AT&amp;T stick to telephones and telegraphs? And who the hell does Yamaha think it is making industrial robots and motorcycles? Stick to musical instruments guys! Sheesh!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah !
Why does n't AT&amp;T stick to telephones and telegraphs ?
And who the hell does Yamaha think it is making industrial robots and motorcycles ?
Stick to musical instruments guys !
Sheesh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah!
Why doesn't AT&amp;T stick to telephones and telegraphs?
And who the hell does Yamaha think it is making industrial robots and motorcycles?
Stick to musical instruments guys!
Sheesh!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831973</id>
	<title>10 cents a song and I'm there</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256147520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>10 cents a song and I'm there.</p><p>Anything more than that, I'm not there, as it makes no sense to charge more than that for a song in an inferior format (compared to CD) such as<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.mp3.</p><p>Ah well, until the online music vendors come to their senses, there's always "free" P2P sites like Skull&amp;Crossbones Harbor, and the like.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>10 cents a song and I 'm there.Anything more than that , I 'm not there , as it makes no sense to charge more than that for a song in an inferior format ( compared to CD ) such as .mp3.Ah well , until the online music vendors come to their senses , there 's always " free " P2P sites like Skull&amp;Crossbones Harbor , and the like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10 cents a song and I'm there.Anything more than that, I'm not there, as it makes no sense to charge more than that for a song in an inferior format (compared to CD) such as .mp3.Ah well, until the online music vendors come to their senses, there's always "free" P2P sites like Skull&amp;Crossbones Harbor, and the like.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831813</id>
	<title>It's a music search feature</title>
	<author>tlhIngan</author>
	<datestamp>1256145060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to TechCrunch, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/21/google-to-partner-with-ilike-and-lala-for-new-music-service/" title="techcrunch.com">it's a music search</a> [techcrunch.com] with the option to do limited streaming. So you can search for music, preview them, then either use those services to buy or use iTunes/Amazon to buy it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to TechCrunch , it 's a music search [ techcrunch.com ] with the option to do limited streaming .
So you can search for music , preview them , then either use those services to buy or use iTunes/Amazon to buy it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to TechCrunch, it's a music search [techcrunch.com] with the option to do limited streaming.
So you can search for music, preview them, then either use those services to buy or use iTunes/Amazon to buy it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834589</id>
	<title>Re:eh....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256222940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having trouble finding the link, but there was an essay on the definitions found in essays:</p><p>"it is theorized that" means "I'm too lazy to do research on it, but here's my thoughts"</p><p>"An inside source" means "I think this"</p><p>"Several inside sources" means "my friends think so too"</p><p>"people familiar with the matter" means "I heard it around the water cooler"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having trouble finding the link , but there was an essay on the definitions found in essays : " it is theorized that " means " I 'm too lazy to do research on it , but here 's my thoughts " " An inside source " means " I think this " " Several inside sources " means " my friends think so too " " people familiar with the matter " means " I heard it around the water cooler "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having trouble finding the link, but there was an essay on the definitions found in essays:"it is theorized that" means "I'm too lazy to do research on it, but here's my thoughts""An inside source" means "I think this""Several inside sources" means "my friends think so too""people familiar with the matter" means "I heard it around the water cooler"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831839</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832363</id>
	<title>Been doing it for years in China already</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256153400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google's been doing this in China for a couple of years already <a href="http://www.google.cn/music" title="google.cn" rel="nofollow">www.google.cn/music</a> [google.cn].  It's ad-supported and provides completely free mp3 downloads and streaming, without DRM and with scrolling lyrics sync'ed to fast-forward and rewind and fully licensed content from all the big four record companies (including both Chinese and Western artists).  It's pretty much exactly what you'd want in an online music service.  It's also IP-blocked unless you're in China.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google 's been doing this in China for a couple of years already www.google.cn/music [ google.cn ] .
It 's ad-supported and provides completely free mp3 downloads and streaming , without DRM and with scrolling lyrics sync'ed to fast-forward and rewind and fully licensed content from all the big four record companies ( including both Chinese and Western artists ) .
It 's pretty much exactly what you 'd want in an online music service .
It 's also IP-blocked unless you 're in China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google's been doing this in China for a couple of years already www.google.cn/music [google.cn].
It's ad-supported and provides completely free mp3 downloads and streaming, without DRM and with scrolling lyrics sync'ed to fast-forward and rewind and fully licensed content from all the big four record companies (including both Chinese and Western artists).
It's pretty much exactly what you'd want in an online music service.
It's also IP-blocked unless you're in China.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831795</id>
	<title>WSJ reports that it's NOT competition for iTunes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256144940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Wall Street Journal's story says that the plan will allow people to buy FROM iTunes and Amazon. According to this version, Google is just providing a link to the music providers when it comes to the purchase.

<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704597704574487423504899680.html" title="wsj.com">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704597704574487423504899680.html</a> [wsj.com]

If you're not a WSJ subscriber, copy the first sentence of the article and Google it. The link from there will allow you to read the whole thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Wall Street Journal 's story says that the plan will allow people to buy FROM iTunes and Amazon .
According to this version , Google is just providing a link to the music providers when it comes to the purchase .
http : //online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704597704574487423504899680.html [ wsj.com ] If you 're not a WSJ subscriber , copy the first sentence of the article and Google it .
The link from there will allow you to read the whole thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Wall Street Journal's story says that the plan will allow people to buy FROM iTunes and Amazon.
According to this version, Google is just providing a link to the music providers when it comes to the purchase.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704597704574487423504899680.html [wsj.com]

If you're not a WSJ subscriber, copy the first sentence of the article and Google it.
The link from there will allow you to read the whole thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834611</id>
	<title>Re:What about the player?</title>
	<author>RiotingPacifist</author>
	<datestamp>1256223060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What features of iTunes do you like? If its shitty program that installs network demons just to play your media then perhaps you should get your head checked there is:<br>amarok (1.4 was a very good playlist based player, 2.x is getting there)<br>rhythmbox (gnome based)<br>mpd based players (work on windows)<br>I suppose windows options are limited as WMP/winamp/foobar are different kinds of players, but there must be something other than songbird</p><p>If its the iPod/Phone syncing related features, then i dont think anything but iTunes will ever compete<br>If its the music store integration then TFA is too sparse on details to tell. Assuming that google audio 1) exists (i mean this is techcrunch), 2) is a music download service, then hopefully they will collaborate with all mediaplayers to add support like mangatunes in amarok. For bonus points they should allow redownloads (within reason) and let you choose the format (some of us really do prefer ogg, hell somebody must be insane enough to like wma)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What features of iTunes do you like ?
If its shitty program that installs network demons just to play your media then perhaps you should get your head checked there is : amarok ( 1.4 was a very good playlist based player , 2.x is getting there ) rhythmbox ( gnome based ) mpd based players ( work on windows ) I suppose windows options are limited as WMP/winamp/foobar are different kinds of players , but there must be something other than songbirdIf its the iPod/Phone syncing related features , then i dont think anything but iTunes will ever competeIf its the music store integration then TFA is too sparse on details to tell .
Assuming that google audio 1 ) exists ( i mean this is techcrunch ) , 2 ) is a music download service , then hopefully they will collaborate with all mediaplayers to add support like mangatunes in amarok .
For bonus points they should allow redownloads ( within reason ) and let you choose the format ( some of us really do prefer ogg , hell somebody must be insane enough to like wma )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What features of iTunes do you like?
If its shitty program that installs network demons just to play your media then perhaps you should get your head checked there is:amarok (1.4 was a very good playlist based player, 2.x is getting there)rhythmbox (gnome based)mpd based players (work on windows)I suppose windows options are limited as WMP/winamp/foobar are different kinds of players, but there must be something other than songbirdIf its the iPod/Phone syncing related features, then i dont think anything but iTunes will ever competeIf its the music store integration then TFA is too sparse on details to tell.
Assuming that google audio 1) exists (i mean this is techcrunch), 2) is a music download service, then hopefully they will collaborate with all mediaplayers to add support like mangatunes in amarok.
For bonus points they should allow redownloads (within reason) and let you choose the format (some of us really do prefer ogg, hell somebody must be insane enough to like wma)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833739</id>
	<title>Re:Spotify not ITunes will be the big competitor</title>
	<author>koiransuklaa</author>
	<datestamp>1256216640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I'd probably go back to the paid subscription if their "Music you may like" feature worked.</p></div></blockquote><p>Tell me about it. I'm not interested in country music (last.fm tells me I've played Carrie Underwood twice, otherwise I can't find anything that could be in that genre)... So, what's in my "Music you may like"?</p><p>Country, bluegrass, progressive country, rockabilly, traditional country and more country. Well done!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd probably go back to the paid subscription if their " Music you may like " feature worked.Tell me about it .
I 'm not interested in country music ( last.fm tells me I 've played Carrie Underwood twice , otherwise I ca n't find anything that could be in that genre ) ... So , what 's in my " Music you may like " ? Country , bluegrass , progressive country , rockabilly , traditional country and more country .
Well done !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd probably go back to the paid subscription if their "Music you may like" feature worked.Tell me about it.
I'm not interested in country music (last.fm tells me I've played Carrie Underwood twice, otherwise I can't find anything that could be in that genre)... So, what's in my "Music you may like"?Country, bluegrass, progressive country, rockabilly, traditional country and more country.
Well done!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833103</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835415</id>
	<title>DRM/Apple/Amazon</title>
	<author>jDeepbeep</author>
	<datestamp>1256227620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>and pushed DRM off the table (aided greatly by Amazon)</p></div><p>I don't know the overall metrics on this, but DRM was the very reason I abandoned iTunes and began purchasing my digital music at Amazon.  Now, I notice that a downloaded MP3 file from Amazon will have an Amazon "song id#" embedded in the id3 data, and I cannot help but wonder if iTunes makes note of that when it scans my music library.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and pushed DRM off the table ( aided greatly by Amazon ) I do n't know the overall metrics on this , but DRM was the very reason I abandoned iTunes and began purchasing my digital music at Amazon .
Now , I notice that a downloaded MP3 file from Amazon will have an Amazon " song id # " embedded in the id3 data , and I can not help but wonder if iTunes makes note of that when it scans my music library .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and pushed DRM off the table (aided greatly by Amazon)I don't know the overall metrics on this, but DRM was the very reason I abandoned iTunes and began purchasing my digital music at Amazon.
Now, I notice that a downloaded MP3 file from Amazon will have an Amazon "song id#" embedded in the id3 data, and I cannot help but wonder if iTunes makes note of that when it scans my music library.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832435</id>
	<title>Re:Its a Fractal</title>
	<author>maglor\_83</author>
	<datestamp>1256154600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maps they could remove and replace with their own version. Youtube they couldn't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maps they could remove and replace with their own version .
Youtube they could n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maps they could remove and replace with their own version.
Youtube they couldn't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834331</id>
	<title>Re:Its a Fractal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256221020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could you clarify "Apple is dominant with their iPhone platform".  Dominant in what?  Overall sales numbers or percentage of phones sold or currently existing in the market?  If either of those is what you are refering too, you are not correct.  They may have the dominant "buzz" in the phone market but the buzz does not and is not translating to dominating the sales numbers in the world phone market.  Meaning they have the most marketing hype but not the most sales.  The new Chevy Camaro, Dodge Charger, and Porsche Panamera may be dominating the car mags and the office water cooler talk and buzz but the Hyundai Accent is still far outselling all three of them combined.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could you clarify " Apple is dominant with their iPhone platform " .
Dominant in what ?
Overall sales numbers or percentage of phones sold or currently existing in the market ?
If either of those is what you are refering too , you are not correct .
They may have the dominant " buzz " in the phone market but the buzz does not and is not translating to dominating the sales numbers in the world phone market .
Meaning they have the most marketing hype but not the most sales .
The new Chevy Camaro , Dodge Charger , and Porsche Panamera may be dominating the car mags and the office water cooler talk and buzz but the Hyundai Accent is still far outselling all three of them combined .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could you clarify "Apple is dominant with their iPhone platform".
Dominant in what?
Overall sales numbers or percentage of phones sold or currently existing in the market?
If either of those is what you are refering too, you are not correct.
They may have the dominant "buzz" in the phone market but the buzz does not and is not translating to dominating the sales numbers in the world phone market.
Meaning they have the most marketing hype but not the most sales.
The new Chevy Camaro, Dodge Charger, and Porsche Panamera may be dominating the car mags and the office water cooler talk and buzz but the Hyundai Accent is still far outselling all three of them combined.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29836687</id>
	<title>Re:Spotify not ITunes will be the big competitor</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1256233080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We've got spotify on this side of the pond too Sven.  Its just not really that impressive.</p><p>Spotify is kind of like buying a house versus renting.</p><p>Yes, you can rent, have to do less work and throw your money away supporting someone else.   Its the socialist in you that likes it.</p><p>We prefer to own, have control over, and be able to know our monthly payments are not just going away and buying us nothing more.</p><p>We also don't all live in 3 cities that have great cell coverage, which people never seem to be able to grasp.  We can't use Spotify in a LARGE portion of our country where people live.  We can however, listen to our iPods with music on them all day long, and we continue to listen to them regardless of what Spotify feels like doing.</p><p>You rent, we buy.  Disney must love you guys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 've got spotify on this side of the pond too Sven .
Its just not really that impressive.Spotify is kind of like buying a house versus renting.Yes , you can rent , have to do less work and throw your money away supporting someone else .
Its the socialist in you that likes it.We prefer to own , have control over , and be able to know our monthly payments are not just going away and buying us nothing more.We also do n't all live in 3 cities that have great cell coverage , which people never seem to be able to grasp .
We ca n't use Spotify in a LARGE portion of our country where people live .
We can however , listen to our iPods with music on them all day long , and we continue to listen to them regardless of what Spotify feels like doing.You rent , we buy .
Disney must love you guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We've got spotify on this side of the pond too Sven.
Its just not really that impressive.Spotify is kind of like buying a house versus renting.Yes, you can rent, have to do less work and throw your money away supporting someone else.
Its the socialist in you that likes it.We prefer to own, have control over, and be able to know our monthly payments are not just going away and buying us nothing more.We also don't all live in 3 cities that have great cell coverage, which people never seem to be able to grasp.
We can't use Spotify in a LARGE portion of our country where people live.
We can however, listen to our iPods with music on them all day long, and we continue to listen to them regardless of what Spotify feels like doing.You rent, we buy.
Disney must love you guys.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832749</id>
	<title>Re:What about the player?</title>
	<author>Weezul</author>
	<datestamp>1256203200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You just made my day!  mpd looks awesome.  Thank you<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You just made my day !
mpd looks awesome .
Thank you : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You just made my day!
mpd looks awesome.
Thank you :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769</id>
	<title>Its a Fractal</title>
	<author>NETHED</author>
	<datestamp>1256144580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This, if true, will only hasten the divide between the two tech darlings Google and Apple.</p><p>Apple has a vested interest in maintaining their defacto monopoly on online music sales though their vertical product pipeline.  The Zune is no real threat, as Microsoft does not have the mindshare.  Google, with Android, have significant clout, and potentially enough mass to unseat Apple from the head of the online music sales table.</p><p>Apple has done very well with the iPhone, but if history is our guide, they did very well with the original Macintosh.  Fast-forward a few years to now, and the story is being repeated.  Apple is dominant with their iPhone platform, but Steve Jobs is too obsessed with removing buttons from mice to loosen his grip on the brand.  This has help Apple survive, but it ultimatly leads to Apple's cyclical demise.</p><p>Anyway, Google launching a music app will cause Apple to remove Google maps, and Youtube integration from their products.  In the end, Google (openness) will win over the closed Apple system.  Yes, the Apple devices will be pretty, but the Google stuff will work well enough, be less expensive, and have 95\%+ of market share.   (Its like we've seen that before somewhere....)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This , if true , will only hasten the divide between the two tech darlings Google and Apple.Apple has a vested interest in maintaining their defacto monopoly on online music sales though their vertical product pipeline .
The Zune is no real threat , as Microsoft does not have the mindshare .
Google , with Android , have significant clout , and potentially enough mass to unseat Apple from the head of the online music sales table.Apple has done very well with the iPhone , but if history is our guide , they did very well with the original Macintosh .
Fast-forward a few years to now , and the story is being repeated .
Apple is dominant with their iPhone platform , but Steve Jobs is too obsessed with removing buttons from mice to loosen his grip on the brand .
This has help Apple survive , but it ultimatly leads to Apple 's cyclical demise.Anyway , Google launching a music app will cause Apple to remove Google maps , and Youtube integration from their products .
In the end , Google ( openness ) will win over the closed Apple system .
Yes , the Apple devices will be pretty , but the Google stuff will work well enough , be less expensive , and have 95 \ % + of market share .
( Its like we 've seen that before somewhere.... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This, if true, will only hasten the divide between the two tech darlings Google and Apple.Apple has a vested interest in maintaining their defacto monopoly on online music sales though their vertical product pipeline.
The Zune is no real threat, as Microsoft does not have the mindshare.
Google, with Android, have significant clout, and potentially enough mass to unseat Apple from the head of the online music sales table.Apple has done very well with the iPhone, but if history is our guide, they did very well with the original Macintosh.
Fast-forward a few years to now, and the story is being repeated.
Apple is dominant with their iPhone platform, but Steve Jobs is too obsessed with removing buttons from mice to loosen his grip on the brand.
This has help Apple survive, but it ultimatly leads to Apple's cyclical demise.Anyway, Google launching a music app will cause Apple to remove Google maps, and Youtube integration from their products.
In the end, Google (openness) will win over the closed Apple system.
Yes, the Apple devices will be pretty, but the Google stuff will work well enough, be less expensive, and have 95\%+ of market share.
(Its like we've seen that before somewhere....)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831745</id>
	<title>woohoo!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256144280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>another half-assed google knockoff!  fill my ass with goo, sergey and larry!</htmltext>
<tokenext>another half-assed google knockoff !
fill my ass with goo , sergey and larry !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>another half-assed google knockoff!
fill my ass with goo, sergey and larry!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29837909</id>
	<title>Re:A little sample of what's to come</title>
	<author>Frankie70</author>
	<datestamp>1256237820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't that good?</p><p><a href="http://www.amiright.com/artists/mistermister.shtml" title="amiright.com">http://www.amiright.com/artists/mistermister.shtml</a> [amiright.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't that good ? http : //www.amiright.com/artists/mistermister.shtml [ amiright.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't that good?http://www.amiright.com/artists/mistermister.shtml [amiright.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831713</id>
	<title>Google did a few years ago...</title>
	<author>iCantSpell</author>
	<datestamp>1256143980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... It's called songbird <a href="http://www.getsongbird.com/" title="getsongbird.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.getsongbird.com/</a> [getsongbird.com] = (mozilla+google)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... It 's called songbird http : //www.getsongbird.com/ [ getsongbird.com ] = ( mozilla + google )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... It's called songbird http://www.getsongbird.com/ [getsongbird.com] = (mozilla+google)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835243</id>
	<title>Re:Its a Fractal</title>
	<author>jedidiah</author>
	<datestamp>1256226900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem with the 80\% Apple share is not the fact that you can or can't<br>buy music from someone else. The problem is that once you have bought DRM<br>encumbered products from Apple you are PERMANENTLY STUCK using their devices<br>and only their devices to access that content.</p><p>It's much like having a copy of Microsoft Money.</p><p>That's where their ability to distort the market comes from.</p><p>Got an old AAC file? Don't want to pay extra just to unlock it?</p><p>Now you are stuck with Apple. The same goes for audio books and movies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with the 80 \ % Apple share is not the fact that you can or can'tbuy music from someone else .
The problem is that once you have bought DRMencumbered products from Apple you are PERMANENTLY STUCK using their devicesand only their devices to access that content.It 's much like having a copy of Microsoft Money.That 's where their ability to distort the market comes from.Got an old AAC file ?
Do n't want to pay extra just to unlock it ? Now you are stuck with Apple .
The same goes for audio books and movies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with the 80\% Apple share is not the fact that you can or can'tbuy music from someone else.
The problem is that once you have bought DRMencumbered products from Apple you are PERMANENTLY STUCK using their devicesand only their devices to access that content.It's much like having a copy of Microsoft Money.That's where their ability to distort the market comes from.Got an old AAC file?
Don't want to pay extra just to unlock it?Now you are stuck with Apple.
The same goes for audio books and movies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832023</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832677</id>
	<title>Re:WSJ reports that it's NOT competition for iTune</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256202000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google going to resell music. Woohoo. Another intermediary to burn money. Another link in the "Songwriter &gt; Musician &gt; Label &gt; Wholesale &gt; Itunes &gt; A dozen resellers &gt; Customer" chain that inflates prices.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google going to resell music .
Woohoo. Another intermediary to burn money .
Another link in the " Songwriter &gt; Musician &gt; Label &gt; Wholesale &gt; Itunes &gt; A dozen resellers &gt; Customer " chain that inflates prices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google going to resell music.
Woohoo. Another intermediary to burn money.
Another link in the "Songwriter &gt; Musician &gt; Label &gt; Wholesale &gt; Itunes &gt; A dozen resellers &gt; Customer" chain that inflates prices.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831681</id>
	<title>Can they take on first post?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256143620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well can they?!!?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well can they ? ! !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well can they?!!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831825</id>
	<title>Re:What about the player?</title>
	<author>rolfwind</author>
	<datestamp>1256145180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really?  I thought both were inferior to digikam.  Digikam seems more built around sorting pics while iPhoto/picas seemed to be built around the camera roll theme,where pics were taken together and near the same time.  I admit my experience with them isn't vast and it has been a while.</p><p>Google players will obviously be the android based phones.  And the record companies have been hoping for a while to break the dominance of iTunes so they can pit distributors against  each other and gain the upper hand in that dynamic again.  Either way it doesn't matter as artists will eventally be able to deal with the marketplaces directly rather than through an expensive middle man once physical media is completely out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
I thought both were inferior to digikam .
Digikam seems more built around sorting pics while iPhoto/picas seemed to be built around the camera roll theme,where pics were taken together and near the same time .
I admit my experience with them is n't vast and it has been a while.Google players will obviously be the android based phones .
And the record companies have been hoping for a while to break the dominance of iTunes so they can pit distributors against each other and gain the upper hand in that dynamic again .
Either way it does n't matter as artists will eventally be able to deal with the marketplaces directly rather than through an expensive middle man once physical media is completely out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
I thought both were inferior to digikam.
Digikam seems more built around sorting pics while iPhoto/picas seemed to be built around the camera roll theme,where pics were taken together and near the same time.
I admit my experience with them isn't vast and it has been a while.Google players will obviously be the android based phones.
And the record companies have been hoping for a while to break the dominance of iTunes so they can pit distributors against  each other and gain the upper hand in that dynamic again.
Either way it doesn't matter as artists will eventally be able to deal with the marketplaces directly rather than through an expensive middle man once physical media is completely out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833029</id>
	<title>Re:What about the player?</title>
	<author>ChienAndalu</author>
	<datestamp>1256207100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For Gnome users, <i>Sonata</i> should be mentioned.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For Gnome users , Sonata should be mentioned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For Gnome users, Sonata should be mentioned.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833579</id>
	<title>Re:Its a Fractal</title>
	<author>bkr1\_2k</author>
	<datestamp>1256214780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This has help Apple survive, but it ultimatly leads to Apple's cyclical demise.</i></p><p>What demise is this?  I've been hearing about Apple's demise for 20 years now, and they're still going strong.  In fact, they're getting stronger.</p><p>Google and Apple will be able to co-exist just fine.  Apple may lose a little market share, but I'm sure they'll survive.  iTMS isn't their wellspring anyway.  It's a helluva bonus, but it's not their primary breadwinner, and as far as I know, isn't expected to be any time soon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This has help Apple survive , but it ultimatly leads to Apple 's cyclical demise.What demise is this ?
I 've been hearing about Apple 's demise for 20 years now , and they 're still going strong .
In fact , they 're getting stronger.Google and Apple will be able to co-exist just fine .
Apple may lose a little market share , but I 'm sure they 'll survive .
iTMS is n't their wellspring anyway .
It 's a helluva bonus , but it 's not their primary breadwinner , and as far as I know , is n't expected to be any time soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has help Apple survive, but it ultimatly leads to Apple's cyclical demise.What demise is this?
I've been hearing about Apple's demise for 20 years now, and they're still going strong.
In fact, they're getting stronger.Google and Apple will be able to co-exist just fine.
Apple may lose a little market share, but I'm sure they'll survive.
iTMS isn't their wellspring anyway.
It's a helluva bonus, but it's not their primary breadwinner, and as far as I know, isn't expected to be any time soon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833541</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously - is Google innovative at all?</title>
	<author>Lincolnshire Poacher</author>
	<datestamp>1256214060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; I put forward that you cannot survive a year<br>&gt; without touching/using a google technology.</p><p>Oh come on, set a real challenge!  It's easy to avoid the Google data aggregator and many of us do.  Look-see!</p><p><tt><br>google search: Alltheweb, cuil, clusty<br>mail: Tuffmail<br>[RSS] reader: Liferea<br>youtube: LiveLeaks<br>maps: Multimap<br>docs: Lyx, Gnumeric<br>books: A library and an Agfa Snapscan<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)<br>code: Sourceforge<br>chrome: FF<br>images: Alltheweb<br>news: BBC, RSS<br>android: Nokia 6210<br>no clicking google ads: All blocked by Privoxy.<br></tt><br>There is nothing there that is unique to Google, nor innately innovative.  Their search was ground-breaking in 1997, but since then Google have had to buy innovative companies to keep abreast of the rest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I put forward that you can not survive a year &gt; without touching/using a google technology.Oh come on , set a real challenge !
It 's easy to avoid the Google data aggregator and many of us do .
Look-see ! google search : Alltheweb , cuil , clustymail : Tuffmail [ RSS ] reader : Lifereayoutube : LiveLeaksmaps : Multimapdocs : Lyx , Gnumericbooks : A library and an Agfa Snapscan : ) code : Sourceforgechrome : FFimages : Allthewebnews : BBC , RSSandroid : Nokia 6210no clicking google ads : All blocked by Privoxy.There is nothing there that is unique to Google , nor innately innovative .
Their search was ground-breaking in 1997 , but since then Google have had to buy innovative companies to keep abreast of the rest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I put forward that you cannot survive a year&gt; without touching/using a google technology.Oh come on, set a real challenge!
It's easy to avoid the Google data aggregator and many of us do.
Look-see!google search: Alltheweb, cuil, clustymail: Tuffmail[RSS] reader: Lifereayoutube: LiveLeaksmaps: Multimapdocs: Lyx, Gnumericbooks: A library and an Agfa Snapscan :)code: Sourceforgechrome: FFimages: Allthewebnews: BBC, RSSandroid: Nokia 6210no clicking google ads: All blocked by Privoxy.There is nothing there that is unique to Google, nor innately innovative.
Their search was ground-breaking in 1997, but since then Google have had to buy innovative companies to keep abreast of the rest.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832943</id>
	<title>ads</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256205840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>are they now also going to insert ads into the songs i listen to?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>are they now also going to insert ads into the songs i listen to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>are they now also going to insert ads into the songs i listen to?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832015</id>
	<title>Seriously - is Google innovative at all?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256148000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All this hype about omgz Google is so innovative.  Let's take a step back and see what they have actually created shall we?<br>Search engine?  There were plenty of search engines before Google came along<br>Android?  Oh look, Apple are doing really well with phones, let's be on the cutting edge and... create a phone<br>Online music?  Apple are doing really well with iTunes, time to be way out there, live life on the edge, and... get into online music<br>Google maps?  Easy to use but hardly a new concept<br>Gmail?  wow!!  how imaginative - a decade after online email they blow everyones minds with, you guessed it... online email</p><p>So all you fanbois - with all the fanfare and hype - what exactly has Google really invented or developed that is so way out there?  I'm not suggesting Apple invented any of those other things either, the difference is Apple + co don't go around telling everyone how they have legions of super smart uber-nerds who come up with ideas us mere mortals cannot even comprehend.  So tell us - besides developing good search algorithms what exactly have these uber-nerds given us that requires such massive pools brain power?</p><p>I put forward that on an innovation per IQ point Google is perhaps the most inefficient use of intelligence ever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All this hype about omgz Google is so innovative .
Let 's take a step back and see what they have actually created shall we ? Search engine ?
There were plenty of search engines before Google came alongAndroid ?
Oh look , Apple are doing really well with phones , let 's be on the cutting edge and... create a phoneOnline music ?
Apple are doing really well with iTunes , time to be way out there , live life on the edge , and... get into online musicGoogle maps ?
Easy to use but hardly a new conceptGmail ?
wow ! ! how imaginative - a decade after online email they blow everyones minds with , you guessed it... online emailSo all you fanbois - with all the fanfare and hype - what exactly has Google really invented or developed that is so way out there ?
I 'm not suggesting Apple invented any of those other things either , the difference is Apple + co do n't go around telling everyone how they have legions of super smart uber-nerds who come up with ideas us mere mortals can not even comprehend .
So tell us - besides developing good search algorithms what exactly have these uber-nerds given us that requires such massive pools brain power ? I put forward that on an innovation per IQ point Google is perhaps the most inefficient use of intelligence ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All this hype about omgz Google is so innovative.
Let's take a step back and see what they have actually created shall we?Search engine?
There were plenty of search engines before Google came alongAndroid?
Oh look, Apple are doing really well with phones, let's be on the cutting edge and... create a phoneOnline music?
Apple are doing really well with iTunes, time to be way out there, live life on the edge, and... get into online musicGoogle maps?
Easy to use but hardly a new conceptGmail?
wow!!  how imaginative - a decade after online email they blow everyones minds with, you guessed it... online emailSo all you fanbois - with all the fanfare and hype - what exactly has Google really invented or developed that is so way out there?
I'm not suggesting Apple invented any of those other things either, the difference is Apple + co don't go around telling everyone how they have legions of super smart uber-nerds who come up with ideas us mere mortals cannot even comprehend.
So tell us - besides developing good search algorithms what exactly have these uber-nerds given us that requires such massive pools brain power?I put forward that on an innovation per IQ point Google is perhaps the most inefficient use of intelligence ever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833103</id>
	<title>Re:Spotify not ITunes will be the big competitor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256207940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Spotify doesn't have good business model.<br> <br>I had a paid account for a month, then switched back to free as the intrusion of the advertisements was next to nill. I simply don't notice. They hardly ever advertise for products I'd even <b>want</b> anyway; I listen to heavy metal and other alternative music; The amount of times I've had mobile phones (I already have a great phone), pop music (can't stand it) and other useless chod pushed into my ears would be amusing if it didn't cost Spotify every time it happened.<br> <br>I'd probably go back to the paid subscription if their "Music you may like" feature worked. At the moment, however, after listening to Alestorm, Korpiklaani, Dream Theatre, Prodigy, and Radiohead, I'm being presented with Kanye West, and other mainstream pop artists.<br> <br>In short, they've made their "free" (ad-supported) service <i>too</i> good.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Spotify does n't have good business model .
I had a paid account for a month , then switched back to free as the intrusion of the advertisements was next to nill .
I simply do n't notice .
They hardly ever advertise for products I 'd even want anyway ; I listen to heavy metal and other alternative music ; The amount of times I 've had mobile phones ( I already have a great phone ) , pop music ( ca n't stand it ) and other useless chod pushed into my ears would be amusing if it did n't cost Spotify every time it happened .
I 'd probably go back to the paid subscription if their " Music you may like " feature worked .
At the moment , however , after listening to Alestorm , Korpiklaani , Dream Theatre , Prodigy , and Radiohead , I 'm being presented with Kanye West , and other mainstream pop artists .
In short , they 've made their " free " ( ad-supported ) service too good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spotify doesn't have good business model.
I had a paid account for a month, then switched back to free as the intrusion of the advertisements was next to nill.
I simply don't notice.
They hardly ever advertise for products I'd even want anyway; I listen to heavy metal and other alternative music; The amount of times I've had mobile phones (I already have a great phone), pop music (can't stand it) and other useless chod pushed into my ears would be amusing if it didn't cost Spotify every time it happened.
I'd probably go back to the paid subscription if their "Music you may like" feature worked.
At the moment, however, after listening to Alestorm, Korpiklaani, Dream Theatre, Prodigy, and Radiohead, I'm being presented with Kanye West, and other mainstream pop artists.
In short, they've made their "free" (ad-supported) service too good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832459</id>
	<title>Re:Its a Fractal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256154960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>defacto monopoly on online music sales</p></div><p>Really?  I get all my online music downloads off of Amazon.  Am I the only one?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>defacto monopoly on online music salesReally ?
I get all my online music downloads off of Amazon .
Am I the only one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>defacto monopoly on online music salesReally?
I get all my online music downloads off of Amazon.
Am I the only one?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833793</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously - is Google innovative at all?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256217180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've gone over a year without using google search/mail/ready/youtube/maps/docs/books/code/chrom/images/news/android..  in fact, i don't need any of that to enjoy the internet<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>I got a GPS - Check<br>I got a web browser - firefox - Check<br>I can't stand youtube - check (comment system SUX)<br>Books? I don't like what they're doing. Guttenburg was doing just fine<br>News?  not a news junkie<br>Android - don't need another phone</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've gone over a year without using google search/mail/ready/youtube/maps/docs/books/code/chrom/images/news/android.. in fact , i do n't need any of that to enjoy the internet : ) I got a GPS - CheckI got a web browser - firefox - CheckI ca n't stand youtube - check ( comment system SUX ) Books ?
I do n't like what they 're doing .
Guttenburg was doing just fineNews ?
not a news junkieAndroid - do n't need another phone</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've gone over a year without using google search/mail/ready/youtube/maps/docs/books/code/chrom/images/news/android..  in fact, i don't need any of that to enjoy the internet :)I got a GPS - CheckI got a web browser - firefox - CheckI can't stand youtube - check (comment system SUX)Books?
I don't like what they're doing.
Guttenburg was doing just fineNews?
not a news junkieAndroid - don't need another phone</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29837207</id>
	<title>Now I can finally</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256235240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...use that refund for all my Google Video purchases.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...use that refund for all my Google Video purchases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...use that refund for all my Google Video purchases.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834861</id>
	<title>Tips from a long-time mpd user</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256224920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's a neat trick that I use to make mpd work better for me:</p><p>Use xbindkeys, set ctrl-alt-shift-f to run <tt>mpc next</tt> and ctrl-alt-shift-d to run <tt>mpc pause</tt>.  Then you can control your music player without switching away from emacs/firefox/pornview/....  (add bindings of 'a' to prev and 's' to stop if you feel like it; I do.).  I'm quite amazed that no music player I know of does something like this by default (or makes it easy to do)---and the "Multimedia Keys" are no substitute, as they're a long distance away from your hands when you're typing (even worse when running pornvi... uh, emacs!)</p><p>I can also recommend binding a key to <tt>xterm -geometry 80x3-32-64  -e 'watch -tn1 mpc'</tt>.  That'll give you nice "mpd status window" in the lower right of your screen.</p><p>(strictly speaking, I'm binding ctrl-alt-shift-[aoeu] because I'm using the dvorak layout, but that's [asdf] on qwerty, so it all makes sense... yes?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a neat trick that I use to make mpd work better for me : Use xbindkeys , set ctrl-alt-shift-f to run mpc next and ctrl-alt-shift-d to run mpc pause .
Then you can control your music player without switching away from emacs/firefox/pornview/.... ( add bindings of 'a ' to prev and 's ' to stop if you feel like it ; I do. ) .
I 'm quite amazed that no music player I know of does something like this by default ( or makes it easy to do ) ---and the " Multimedia Keys " are no substitute , as they 're a long distance away from your hands when you 're typing ( even worse when running pornvi... uh , emacs !
) I can also recommend binding a key to xterm -geometry 80x3-32-64 -e 'watch -tn1 mpc' .
That 'll give you nice " mpd status window " in the lower right of your screen .
( strictly speaking , I 'm binding ctrl-alt-shift- [ aoeu ] because I 'm using the dvorak layout , but that 's [ asdf ] on qwerty , so it all makes sense.. .
yes ? )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a neat trick that I use to make mpd work better for me:Use xbindkeys, set ctrl-alt-shift-f to run mpc next and ctrl-alt-shift-d to run mpc pause.
Then you can control your music player without switching away from emacs/firefox/pornview/....  (add bindings of 'a' to prev and 's' to stop if you feel like it; I do.).
I'm quite amazed that no music player I know of does something like this by default (or makes it easy to do)---and the "Multimedia Keys" are no substitute, as they're a long distance away from your hands when you're typing (even worse when running pornvi... uh, emacs!
)I can also recommend binding a key to xterm -geometry 80x3-32-64  -e 'watch -tn1 mpc'.
That'll give you nice "mpd status window" in the lower right of your screen.
(strictly speaking, I'm binding ctrl-alt-shift-[aoeu] because I'm using the dvorak layout, but that's [asdf] on qwerty, so it all makes sense...
yes?)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29838185</id>
	<title>Re:Sensational headlines vs reality</title>
	<author>WiiVault</author>
	<datestamp>1256238960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shhhhhhhh don't quell the satifaction of the average Apple hating slashtard!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Shhhhhhhh do n't quell the satifaction of the average Apple hating slashtard !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shhhhhhhh don't quell the satifaction of the average Apple hating slashtard!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835397</id>
	<title>Remember kids, Google's not a monopoly!</title>
	<author>The Altruist</author>
	<datestamp>1256227500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wait for the day, and you know it's coming, when Google rolls out it's ChromeOS, and the EU demands that they give consumers the choice of which browser to use.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wait for the day , and you know it 's coming , when Google rolls out it 's ChromeOS , and the EU demands that they give consumers the choice of which browser to use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wait for the day, and you know it's coming, when Google rolls out it's ChromeOS, and the EU demands that they give consumers the choice of which browser to use.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832085</id>
	<title>Re:What about the player?</title>
	<author>EvilIdler</author>
	<datestamp>1256149080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"see palm"?! Palm tried to use iTunes to sync with THEIR devices. Not make a program of their own to sync with iPods.</p><p>I'd welcome an alternative to iTunes, especially if it had the selection of iTunes, the prices of eMusic and the convenience of Amarok. They'd be better off just plugging into Amarok, really. Also strike a deal with eMusic, while they're at it. Albums are technically $6 apiece, which is better than iTunes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" see palm " ? !
Palm tried to use iTunes to sync with THEIR devices .
Not make a program of their own to sync with iPods.I 'd welcome an alternative to iTunes , especially if it had the selection of iTunes , the prices of eMusic and the convenience of Amarok .
They 'd be better off just plugging into Amarok , really .
Also strike a deal with eMusic , while they 're at it .
Albums are technically $ 6 apiece , which is better than iTunes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"see palm"?!
Palm tried to use iTunes to sync with THEIR devices.
Not make a program of their own to sync with iPods.I'd welcome an alternative to iTunes, especially if it had the selection of iTunes, the prices of eMusic and the convenience of Amarok.
They'd be better off just plugging into Amarok, really.
Also strike a deal with eMusic, while they're at it.
Albums are technically $6 apiece, which is better than iTunes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831911</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835387</id>
	<title>emusic!!!</title>
	<author>HardWoodWorker</author>
	<datestamp>1256227500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I prefer emusic.  They're the first service that was cost effective and more convenient than piracy.  They have all my music (I prefer electronica and industrial), so I never bother with iTunes.<br> <br>
If I want to pay iTunes prices and not deal with the BS DRM, I can go to Amazon.  <br> <br>

I could really care less about another music store.  They're probably just preparing for Android to hit iPhones with music capability.  <br> <br>

A decent mp3 player on Linux...that would be interesting.  Amarok is glacially slow and incredibly unstable.  Rhythmbox is reasonable, but has bugs with ID3 tags that I never deal with in Musicmatch in the old days and Media Monkey today on windows.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer emusic .
They 're the first service that was cost effective and more convenient than piracy .
They have all my music ( I prefer electronica and industrial ) , so I never bother with iTunes .
If I want to pay iTunes prices and not deal with the BS DRM , I can go to Amazon .
I could really care less about another music store .
They 're probably just preparing for Android to hit iPhones with music capability .
A decent mp3 player on Linux...that would be interesting .
Amarok is glacially slow and incredibly unstable .
Rhythmbox is reasonable , but has bugs with ID3 tags that I never deal with in Musicmatch in the old days and Media Monkey today on windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer emusic.
They're the first service that was cost effective and more convenient than piracy.
They have all my music (I prefer electronica and industrial), so I never bother with iTunes.
If I want to pay iTunes prices and not deal with the BS DRM, I can go to Amazon.
I could really care less about another music store.
They're probably just preparing for Android to hit iPhones with music capability.
A decent mp3 player on Linux...that would be interesting.
Amarok is glacially slow and incredibly unstable.
Rhythmbox is reasonable, but has bugs with ID3 tags that I never deal with in Musicmatch in the old days and Media Monkey today on windows.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834941</id>
	<title>Re:What about the player?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256225340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, foobar2000 did that backend/frontend thing ages ago, not to mention it looks a lot better and is customizable like hell.

<a href="http://www.foobar2000.org/" title="foobar2000.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.foobar2000.org/</a> [foobar2000.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , foobar2000 did that backend/frontend thing ages ago , not to mention it looks a lot better and is customizable like hell .
http : //www.foobar2000.org/ [ foobar2000.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, foobar2000 did that backend/frontend thing ages ago, not to mention it looks a lot better and is customizable like hell.
http://www.foobar2000.org/ [foobar2000.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831743</id>
	<title>Re:Google did a few years ago...</title>
	<author>ajdlinux</author>
	<datestamp>1256144280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think they're talking about iTMS here, not just the iTunes player.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think they 're talking about iTMS here , not just the iTunes player .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think they're talking about iTMS here, not just the iTunes player.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831713</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834227</id>
	<title>How did this get down to an iPod thread?</title>
	<author>lightrush</author>
	<datestamp>1256220240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>How did this get down to an iPod thread?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How did this get down to an iPod thread ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How did this get down to an iPod thread?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832501</id>
	<title>Is it the music or the player?</title>
	<author>Whiteox</author>
	<datestamp>1256242260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The trouble with iTunes as a front end is that it is designed to be half the ui of an ipod. A lot of non-ipod iTunes users, use it to sort, catalog and play their libraries and it does an excellent job at that. Try and export to a non-Apple media player and you get problems as it stuffs up the filenames.</p><p>The problem with iPods, is that you need iTunes to sync/delete/add stuff.<br>So if Google or whomever would come up with an iTunes like front-end with decent performance and could make it equally good at consolidating media, you'll have a VLC like multimedia player that can sort, convert, catalog, backup, share, stream, import and export with installable codecs and plugins then count me in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The trouble with iTunes as a front end is that it is designed to be half the ui of an ipod .
A lot of non-ipod iTunes users , use it to sort , catalog and play their libraries and it does an excellent job at that .
Try and export to a non-Apple media player and you get problems as it stuffs up the filenames.The problem with iPods , is that you need iTunes to sync/delete/add stuff.So if Google or whomever would come up with an iTunes like front-end with decent performance and could make it equally good at consolidating media , you 'll have a VLC like multimedia player that can sort , convert , catalog , backup , share , stream , import and export with installable codecs and plugins then count me in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The trouble with iTunes as a front end is that it is designed to be half the ui of an ipod.
A lot of non-ipod iTunes users, use it to sort, catalog and play their libraries and it does an excellent job at that.
Try and export to a non-Apple media player and you get problems as it stuffs up the filenames.The problem with iPods, is that you need iTunes to sync/delete/add stuff.So if Google or whomever would come up with an iTunes like front-end with decent performance and could make it equally good at consolidating media, you'll have a VLC like multimedia player that can sort, convert, catalog, backup, share, stream, import and export with installable codecs and plugins then count me in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832347</id>
	<title>Re:What's with the tags?</title>
	<author>PReDiToR</author>
	<datestamp>1256153220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So on top of knowing the contents of your email, the names of people you talk to, your voice print, your credit card details, your bank numbers, your search history and your reading preferences, where you live, your IP address, photos of you, your friends family and pets, and how technologically inclined you are<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Now you want them to know what kind of music you like too!
<br> <br>Wait, that came out wrong, I was just watching that horse running off down my garden and thinking about a door that I could do to go and lock.
<br> <br>It isn't about them doing something wrong per se, it is about them being so far reaching in their ability to data mine each and every person that uses their services.
<br> <br>Think what would happen if Microsoft bought them out because they got bored of playing internet billionaires? Or if the government decided that they were a threat to security and absorbed them into itself for our protection. Some thoughts just aren't pretty and that is why some people tag "fuckgoogle".
<br> <br>What's worse is that if you don't voluntarily hand over all this information you are in the minority (or soon will be) and that itself will mark you as a person of interest.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So on top of knowing the contents of your email , the names of people you talk to , your voice print , your credit card details , your bank numbers , your search history and your reading preferences , where you live , your IP address , photos of you , your friends family and pets , and how technologically inclined you are ... Now you want them to know what kind of music you like too !
Wait , that came out wrong , I was just watching that horse running off down my garden and thinking about a door that I could do to go and lock .
It is n't about them doing something wrong per se , it is about them being so far reaching in their ability to data mine each and every person that uses their services .
Think what would happen if Microsoft bought them out because they got bored of playing internet billionaires ?
Or if the government decided that they were a threat to security and absorbed them into itself for our protection .
Some thoughts just are n't pretty and that is why some people tag " fuckgoogle " .
What 's worse is that if you do n't voluntarily hand over all this information you are in the minority ( or soon will be ) and that itself will mark you as a person of interest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So on top of knowing the contents of your email, the names of people you talk to, your voice print, your credit card details, your bank numbers, your search history and your reading preferences, where you live, your IP address, photos of you, your friends family and pets, and how technologically inclined you are ... Now you want them to know what kind of music you like too!
Wait, that came out wrong, I was just watching that horse running off down my garden and thinking about a door that I could do to go and lock.
It isn't about them doing something wrong per se, it is about them being so far reaching in their ability to data mine each and every person that uses their services.
Think what would happen if Microsoft bought them out because they got bored of playing internet billionaires?
Or if the government decided that they were a threat to security and absorbed them into itself for our protection.
Some thoughts just aren't pretty and that is why some people tag "fuckgoogle".
What's worse is that if you don't voluntarily hand over all this information you are in the minority (or soon will be) and that itself will mark you as a person of interest.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832075</id>
	<title>Re:Google did a few years ago...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256149020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Songbird doesn't even have global hotkeys for mac or linux yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Songbird does n't even have global hotkeys for mac or linux yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Songbird doesn't even have global hotkeys for mac or linux yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831713</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834285</id>
	<title>This ought to be good..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256220660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...pulls out popcorn.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...pulls out popcorn.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...pulls out popcorn.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834935</id>
	<title>Re:What about the player?</title>
	<author>randomsearch</author>
	<datestamp>1256225280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I completely agree with the comments on Picasa.</p><p>I'd like to add that Linux users can run Picasa under Wine and it works perfectly (in my experience).  It's also provided completely pre-packaged and installed like a charm on Ubuntu.  The only downside is that some of the fonts don't look as nice as native applications.  It's much, much faster than equivalent GNOME applications such as f-spot, is more robust and scales better.</p><p>RS</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I completely agree with the comments on Picasa.I 'd like to add that Linux users can run Picasa under Wine and it works perfectly ( in my experience ) .
It 's also provided completely pre-packaged and installed like a charm on Ubuntu .
The only downside is that some of the fonts do n't look as nice as native applications .
It 's much , much faster than equivalent GNOME applications such as f-spot , is more robust and scales better.RS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I completely agree with the comments on Picasa.I'd like to add that Linux users can run Picasa under Wine and it works perfectly (in my experience).
It's also provided completely pre-packaged and installed like a charm on Ubuntu.
The only downside is that some of the fonts don't look as nice as native applications.
It's much, much faster than equivalent GNOME applications such as f-spot, is more robust and scales better.RS</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29840923</id>
	<title>Re:Please save us Google!</title>
	<author>TheSunborn</author>
	<datestamp>1256210580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, the fuckup is that Apple prevent others from writing software that interface with their music store. It's more like if ford said I could only use their fuel, even thou the car would work with any kind of fuel. (For keeping with the car analogy)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , the fuckup is that Apple prevent others from writing software that interface with their music store .
It 's more like if ford said I could only use their fuel , even thou the car would work with any kind of fuel .
( For keeping with the car analogy )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, the fuckup is that Apple prevent others from writing software that interface with their music store.
It's more like if ford said I could only use their fuel, even thou the car would work with any kind of fuel.
(For keeping with the car analogy)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29836807</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833621</id>
	<title>Satan or not...</title>
	<author>irving47</author>
	<datestamp>1256215440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's see, we all know about Google's Don't be evil mantra...<br>What is it they say?<br>Gotta shake hands with the devil to do the lord's work...<br>If you dance with the devil you're bound to get burnt, or something like that...<br>So now they're going to get in bed with the devil (RIAA)... What are the results of that? Volcanic herpes or the business equivalent?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's see , we all know about Google 's Do n't be evil mantra...What is it they say ? Got ta shake hands with the devil to do the lord 's work...If you dance with the devil you 're bound to get burnt , or something like that...So now they 're going to get in bed with the devil ( RIAA ) ... What are the results of that ?
Volcanic herpes or the business equivalent ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's see, we all know about Google's Don't be evil mantra...What is it they say?Gotta shake hands with the devil to do the lord's work...If you dance with the devil you're bound to get burnt, or something like that...So now they're going to get in bed with the devil (RIAA)... What are the results of that?
Volcanic herpes or the business equivalent?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834315</id>
	<title>Re:Its a Fractal</title>
	<author>bravecanadian</author>
	<datestamp>1256220960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you need to look up de facto.</p><p>It isn't that people can't buy music somewhere else.  It is that they are already familiar with iTunes and iTunes has such a huge mindshare that 90\% of new competitors in this arena are left fighting over the scraps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you need to look up de facto.It is n't that people ca n't buy music somewhere else .
It is that they are already familiar with iTunes and iTunes has such a huge mindshare that 90 \ % of new competitors in this arena are left fighting over the scraps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you need to look up de facto.It isn't that people can't buy music somewhere else.
It is that they are already familiar with iTunes and iTunes has such a huge mindshare that 90\% of new competitors in this arena are left fighting over the scraps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832023</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29838203</id>
	<title>Re:googles success rate is pretty low</title>
	<author>WiiVault</author>
	<datestamp>1256239020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To be fair its hard to know for sure. Still depsite the quality I have never seen anybody other than myself using Picasa or any of the other Google apps.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair its hard to know for sure .
Still depsite the quality I have never seen anybody other than myself using Picasa or any of the other Google apps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair its hard to know for sure.
Still depsite the quality I have never seen anybody other than myself using Picasa or any of the other Google apps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835237</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833525</id>
	<title>+-    Technology: Google To Take On ITunes?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256213700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it is iTunes you iNsensitive Clod!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it is iTunes you iNsensitive Clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it is iTunes you iNsensitive Clod!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835237</id>
	<title>googles success rate is pretty low</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1256226900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Only a fraction of google's software offerings beat the competition.  And even smaller fraction of that make any money.  Most dies a slow death fallingoff the edge to the google toolbar.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only a fraction of google 's software offerings beat the competition .
And even smaller fraction of that make any money .
Most dies a slow death fallingoff the edge to the google toolbar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only a fraction of google's software offerings beat the competition.
And even smaller fraction of that make any money.
Most dies a slow death fallingoff the edge to the google toolbar.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833489</id>
	<title>Re:WSJ reports that it's NOT competition for iTune</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256213160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Soon it'll be "If you don't want to buy it from iTunes or Amazon, just copy the first line of the song and Google it.  The link from there will allow you to hear the whole thing."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Soon it 'll be " If you do n't want to buy it from iTunes or Amazon , just copy the first line of the song and Google it .
The link from there will allow you to hear the whole thing .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Soon it'll be "If you don't want to buy it from iTunes or Amazon, just copy the first line of the song and Google it.
The link from there will allow you to hear the whole thing.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832857</id>
	<title>Re:WSJ reports that it's NOT competition for iTune</title>
	<author>linahnyi</author>
	<datestamp>1256204580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.uggboots-space.com/" title="uggboots-space.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.uggboots-space.com/</a> [uggboots-space.com] ugg boots</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.uggboots-space.com/ [ uggboots-space.com ] ugg boots</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.uggboots-space.com/ [uggboots-space.com] ugg boots</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831819</id>
	<title>Your officia| guide to the jigabo0 pre$idency</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256145120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congratulations on your purchase of a brand new nigger! If handled properly, your apeman will give years of valuable, if reluctant, service.</p><p>INSTALLING YOUR NIGGER.<br>You should install your nigger differently according to whether you have purchased the field or house model. Field niggers work best in a serial configuration, i.e. chained together. Chain your nigger to another nigger immediately after unpacking it, and don't even think about taking that chain off, ever. Many niggers start singing as soon as you put a chain on them. This habit can usually be thrashed out of them if nipped in the bud. House niggers work best as standalone units, but should be hobbled or hamstrung to prevent attempts at escape. At this stage, your nigger can also be given a name. Most owners use the same names over and over, since niggers become confused by too much data. Rufus, Rastus, Remus, Toby, Carslisle, Carlton, Hey-You!-Yes-you!, Yeller, Blackstar, and Sambo are all effective names for your new buck nigger. If your nigger is a ho, it should be called Latrelle, L'Tanya, or Jemima. Some owners call their nigger hoes Latrine for a joke. Pearl, Blossom, and Ivory are also righteous names for nigger hoes. These names go straight over your nigger's head, by the way.</p><p>CONFIGURING YOUR NIGGER<br>Owing to a design error, your nigger comes equipped with a tongue and vocal chords. Most niggers can master only a few basic human phrases with this apparatus - "muh dick" being the most popular. However, others make barking, yelping, yapping noises and appear to be in some pain, so you should probably call a vet and have him remove your nigger's tongue. Once de-tongued your nigger will be a lot happier - at least, you won't hear it complaining anywhere near as much. Niggers have nothing interesting to say, anyway. Many owners also castrate their niggers for health reasons (yours, mine, and that of women, not the nigger's). This is strongly recommended, and frankly, it's a mystery why this is not done on the boat</p><p>HOUSING YOUR NIGGER.<br>Your nigger can be accommodated in cages with stout iron bars. Make sure, however, that the bars are wide enough to push pieces of nigger food through. The rule of thumb is, four niggers per square yard of cage. So a fifteen foot by thirty foot nigger cage can accommodate two hundred niggers. You can site a nigger cage anywhere, even on soft ground. Don't worry about your nigger fashioning makeshift shovels out of odd pieces of wood and digging an escape tunnel under the bars of the cage. Niggers never invented the shovel before and they're not about to now. In any case, your nigger is certainly too lazy to attempt escape. As long as the free food holds out, your nigger is living better than it did in Africa, so it will stay put. Buck niggers and hoe niggers can be safely accommodated in the same cage, as bucks never attempt sex with black hoes.</p><p>FEEDING YOUR NIGGER.<br>Your Nigger likes fried chicken, corn bread, and watermelon. You should therefore give it none of these things because its lazy ass almost certainly doesn't deserve it. Instead, feed it on porridge with salt, and creek water. Your nigger will supplement its diet with whatever it finds in the fields, other niggers, etc. Experienced nigger owners sometimes push watermelon slices through the bars of the nigger cage at the end of the day as a treat, but only if all niggers have worked well and nothing has been stolen that day. Mike of the Old Ranch Plantation reports that this last one is a killer, since all niggers steal something almost every single day of their lives. He reports he doesn't have to spend much on free watermelon for his niggers as a result. You should never allow your nigger meal breaks while at work, since if it stops work for more than ten minutes it will need to be retrained. You would be surprised how long it takes to teach a nigger to pick cotton. You really would. Coffee beans? Don't ask. You have no idea.</p><p>MAKING YOUR NIGGER WORK.<br>Niggers are very, very averse to work of any kind. The nigger's most</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations on your purchase of a brand new nigger !
If handled properly , your apeman will give years of valuable , if reluctant , service.INSTALLING YOUR NIGGER.You should install your nigger differently according to whether you have purchased the field or house model .
Field niggers work best in a serial configuration , i.e .
chained together .
Chain your nigger to another nigger immediately after unpacking it , and do n't even think about taking that chain off , ever .
Many niggers start singing as soon as you put a chain on them .
This habit can usually be thrashed out of them if nipped in the bud .
House niggers work best as standalone units , but should be hobbled or hamstrung to prevent attempts at escape .
At this stage , your nigger can also be given a name .
Most owners use the same names over and over , since niggers become confused by too much data .
Rufus , Rastus , Remus , Toby , Carslisle , Carlton , Hey-You ! -Yes-you ! , Yeller , Blackstar , and Sambo are all effective names for your new buck nigger .
If your nigger is a ho , it should be called Latrelle , L'Tanya , or Jemima .
Some owners call their nigger hoes Latrine for a joke .
Pearl , Blossom , and Ivory are also righteous names for nigger hoes .
These names go straight over your nigger 's head , by the way.CONFIGURING YOUR NIGGEROwing to a design error , your nigger comes equipped with a tongue and vocal chords .
Most niggers can master only a few basic human phrases with this apparatus - " muh dick " being the most popular .
However , others make barking , yelping , yapping noises and appear to be in some pain , so you should probably call a vet and have him remove your nigger 's tongue .
Once de-tongued your nigger will be a lot happier - at least , you wo n't hear it complaining anywhere near as much .
Niggers have nothing interesting to say , anyway .
Many owners also castrate their niggers for health reasons ( yours , mine , and that of women , not the nigger 's ) .
This is strongly recommended , and frankly , it 's a mystery why this is not done on the boatHOUSING YOUR NIGGER.Your nigger can be accommodated in cages with stout iron bars .
Make sure , however , that the bars are wide enough to push pieces of nigger food through .
The rule of thumb is , four niggers per square yard of cage .
So a fifteen foot by thirty foot nigger cage can accommodate two hundred niggers .
You can site a nigger cage anywhere , even on soft ground .
Do n't worry about your nigger fashioning makeshift shovels out of odd pieces of wood and digging an escape tunnel under the bars of the cage .
Niggers never invented the shovel before and they 're not about to now .
In any case , your nigger is certainly too lazy to attempt escape .
As long as the free food holds out , your nigger is living better than it did in Africa , so it will stay put .
Buck niggers and hoe niggers can be safely accommodated in the same cage , as bucks never attempt sex with black hoes.FEEDING YOUR NIGGER.Your Nigger likes fried chicken , corn bread , and watermelon .
You should therefore give it none of these things because its lazy ass almost certainly does n't deserve it .
Instead , feed it on porridge with salt , and creek water .
Your nigger will supplement its diet with whatever it finds in the fields , other niggers , etc .
Experienced nigger owners sometimes push watermelon slices through the bars of the nigger cage at the end of the day as a treat , but only if all niggers have worked well and nothing has been stolen that day .
Mike of the Old Ranch Plantation reports that this last one is a killer , since all niggers steal something almost every single day of their lives .
He reports he does n't have to spend much on free watermelon for his niggers as a result .
You should never allow your nigger meal breaks while at work , since if it stops work for more than ten minutes it will need to be retrained .
You would be surprised how long it takes to teach a nigger to pick cotton .
You really would .
Coffee beans ?
Do n't ask .
You have no idea.MAKING YOUR NIGGER WORK.Niggers are very , very averse to work of any kind .
The nigger 's most</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations on your purchase of a brand new nigger!
If handled properly, your apeman will give years of valuable, if reluctant, service.INSTALLING YOUR NIGGER.You should install your nigger differently according to whether you have purchased the field or house model.
Field niggers work best in a serial configuration, i.e.
chained together.
Chain your nigger to another nigger immediately after unpacking it, and don't even think about taking that chain off, ever.
Many niggers start singing as soon as you put a chain on them.
This habit can usually be thrashed out of them if nipped in the bud.
House niggers work best as standalone units, but should be hobbled or hamstrung to prevent attempts at escape.
At this stage, your nigger can also be given a name.
Most owners use the same names over and over, since niggers become confused by too much data.
Rufus, Rastus, Remus, Toby, Carslisle, Carlton, Hey-You!-Yes-you!, Yeller, Blackstar, and Sambo are all effective names for your new buck nigger.
If your nigger is a ho, it should be called Latrelle, L'Tanya, or Jemima.
Some owners call their nigger hoes Latrine for a joke.
Pearl, Blossom, and Ivory are also righteous names for nigger hoes.
These names go straight over your nigger's head, by the way.CONFIGURING YOUR NIGGEROwing to a design error, your nigger comes equipped with a tongue and vocal chords.
Most niggers can master only a few basic human phrases with this apparatus - "muh dick" being the most popular.
However, others make barking, yelping, yapping noises and appear to be in some pain, so you should probably call a vet and have him remove your nigger's tongue.
Once de-tongued your nigger will be a lot happier - at least, you won't hear it complaining anywhere near as much.
Niggers have nothing interesting to say, anyway.
Many owners also castrate their niggers for health reasons (yours, mine, and that of women, not the nigger's).
This is strongly recommended, and frankly, it's a mystery why this is not done on the boatHOUSING YOUR NIGGER.Your nigger can be accommodated in cages with stout iron bars.
Make sure, however, that the bars are wide enough to push pieces of nigger food through.
The rule of thumb is, four niggers per square yard of cage.
So a fifteen foot by thirty foot nigger cage can accommodate two hundred niggers.
You can site a nigger cage anywhere, even on soft ground.
Don't worry about your nigger fashioning makeshift shovels out of odd pieces of wood and digging an escape tunnel under the bars of the cage.
Niggers never invented the shovel before and they're not about to now.
In any case, your nigger is certainly too lazy to attempt escape.
As long as the free food holds out, your nigger is living better than it did in Africa, so it will stay put.
Buck niggers and hoe niggers can be safely accommodated in the same cage, as bucks never attempt sex with black hoes.FEEDING YOUR NIGGER.Your Nigger likes fried chicken, corn bread, and watermelon.
You should therefore give it none of these things because its lazy ass almost certainly doesn't deserve it.
Instead, feed it on porridge with salt, and creek water.
Your nigger will supplement its diet with whatever it finds in the fields, other niggers, etc.
Experienced nigger owners sometimes push watermelon slices through the bars of the nigger cage at the end of the day as a treat, but only if all niggers have worked well and nothing has been stolen that day.
Mike of the Old Ranch Plantation reports that this last one is a killer, since all niggers steal something almost every single day of their lives.
He reports he doesn't have to spend much on free watermelon for his niggers as a result.
You should never allow your nigger meal breaks while at work, since if it stops work for more than ten minutes it will need to be retrained.
You would be surprised how long it takes to teach a nigger to pick cotton.
You really would.
Coffee beans?
Don't ask.
You have no idea.MAKING YOUR NIGGER WORK.Niggers are very, very averse to work of any kind.
The nigger's most</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831713</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834557</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously - is Google innovative at all?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256222640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No google ads?</p><p>You had me up until that last bit...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No google ads ? You had me up until that last bit... : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No google ads?You had me up until that last bit... :(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832023</id>
	<title>Re:Its a Fractal</title>
	<author>RickRussellTX</author>
	<datestamp>1256148240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Apple has a vested interest in maintaining their defacto monopoly
on online music sales though their vertical product pipeline.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Are you certifiably insane? They have no such monopoly. You can buy music all over the place, without DRM. I've been buying music on-line for years, and I think the last iTune I purchased was 2005. Heck, Amazon's downloader (native versions for Win, Mac and I think Linux) will download albums and add them to iTunes for you, utterly transparently, and they have since at least 2007, which is long time on the technology clock. In that time I've moved my entire music collection from Win, to Linux, to Mac, back to Win without so much as a blip.</p><p>Do they have a de facto monopoly on portable video solutions that actually work? I might give you that, but it's purely de facto. They aren't preventing others from entering the market or abusing market power. It's hardly Apple's fault that nobody else (except Pirate Bay) can do it correctly.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple has a vested interest in maintaining their defacto monopoly on online music sales though their vertical product pipeline .
Are you certifiably insane ?
They have no such monopoly .
You can buy music all over the place , without DRM .
I 've been buying music on-line for years , and I think the last iTune I purchased was 2005 .
Heck , Amazon 's downloader ( native versions for Win , Mac and I think Linux ) will download albums and add them to iTunes for you , utterly transparently , and they have since at least 2007 , which is long time on the technology clock .
In that time I 've moved my entire music collection from Win , to Linux , to Mac , back to Win without so much as a blip.Do they have a de facto monopoly on portable video solutions that actually work ?
I might give you that , but it 's purely de facto .
They are n't preventing others from entering the market or abusing market power .
It 's hardly Apple 's fault that nobody else ( except Pirate Bay ) can do it correctly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple has a vested interest in maintaining their defacto monopoly
on online music sales though their vertical product pipeline.
Are you certifiably insane?
They have no such monopoly.
You can buy music all over the place, without DRM.
I've been buying music on-line for years, and I think the last iTune I purchased was 2005.
Heck, Amazon's downloader (native versions for Win, Mac and I think Linux) will download albums and add them to iTunes for you, utterly transparently, and they have since at least 2007, which is long time on the technology clock.
In that time I've moved my entire music collection from Win, to Linux, to Mac, back to Win without so much as a blip.Do they have a de facto monopoly on portable video solutions that actually work?
I might give you that, but it's purely de facto.
They aren't preventing others from entering the market or abusing market power.
It's hardly Apple's fault that nobody else (except Pirate Bay) can do it correctly.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834807</id>
	<title>Re:What about the player?</title>
	<author>TheCycoONE</author>
	<datestamp>1256224560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Digicam is impressive, but overwhelming for a casual user compared with F-Spot, iPhoto, Picasa, and Adobe Photoshop Album SE (imho)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Digicam is impressive , but overwhelming for a casual user compared with F-Spot , iPhoto , Picasa , and Adobe Photoshop Album SE ( imho )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Digicam is impressive, but overwhelming for a casual user compared with F-Spot, iPhoto, Picasa, and Adobe Photoshop Album SE (imho)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832159</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously - is Google innovative at all?</title>
	<author>tibman</author>
	<datestamp>1256150340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I put forward that you cannot survive a year without touching/using a google technology.  If you truely believe google tech is mediocre.. go a year without google search/mail/reader/youtube/maps/docs/books/code/chrome/images/news/android and of course.. no clicking google ads.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Search engine? There were plenty of search engines before Google came along</p></div><p>Agreed, but why did google become so popular?  It was great and very minimal.  We didn't want "web portals" filled with ads, news, and junk.. just a simple place to find sites from.  Was that innovative? heck no.. was it very intelligent? yes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I put forward that you can not survive a year without touching/using a google technology .
If you truely believe google tech is mediocre.. go a year without google search/mail/reader/youtube/maps/docs/books/code/chrome/images/news/android and of course.. no clicking google ads.Search engine ?
There were plenty of search engines before Google came alongAgreed , but why did google become so popular ?
It was great and very minimal .
We did n't want " web portals " filled with ads , news , and junk.. just a simple place to find sites from .
Was that innovative ?
heck no.. was it very intelligent ?
yes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I put forward that you cannot survive a year without touching/using a google technology.
If you truely believe google tech is mediocre.. go a year without google search/mail/reader/youtube/maps/docs/books/code/chrome/images/news/android and of course.. no clicking google ads.Search engine?
There were plenty of search engines before Google came alongAgreed, but why did google become so popular?
It was great and very minimal.
We didn't want "web portals" filled with ads, news, and junk.. just a simple place to find sites from.
Was that innovative?
heck no.. was it very intelligent?
yes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832037</id>
	<title>Re:What about the player?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256148360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Blackberry does fine syncing with iTunes.  "See Palm" is a case study in asshattery.  If Palm had used the iTunes sync APIs, or even if it just parsed the iTunes library XML, they'd be able sync without issue.  Palm did it out of sloth, for publicity, and to get people like you to make comments like yours.</p><p>Ignorance and random Apple-bashing.  How original.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Blackberry does fine syncing with iTunes .
" See Palm " is a case study in asshattery .
If Palm had used the iTunes sync APIs , or even if it just parsed the iTunes library XML , they 'd be able sync without issue .
Palm did it out of sloth , for publicity , and to get people like you to make comments like yours.Ignorance and random Apple-bashing .
How original .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blackberry does fine syncing with iTunes.
"See Palm" is a case study in asshattery.
If Palm had used the iTunes sync APIs, or even if it just parsed the iTunes library XML, they'd be able sync without issue.
Palm did it out of sloth, for publicity, and to get people like you to make comments like yours.Ignorance and random Apple-bashing.
How original.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831911</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835569</id>
	<title>Re:Spotify not ITunes will be the big competitor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256228160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As someone without access to Spotify, what's the benefit of Spotify versus the all-you-can-eat style music subscriptions like Rhapsody or Napster?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As someone without access to Spotify , what 's the benefit of Spotify versus the all-you-can-eat style music subscriptions like Rhapsody or Napster ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As someone without access to Spotify, what's the benefit of Spotify versus the all-you-can-eat style music subscriptions like Rhapsody or Napster?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832785</id>
	<title>Re:What about the player?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256203680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just visited mpd.wikia.org in opera and it redirected to some zroalert.com site "Initializing virus scanner" with a little alert saying my computer was at high risk and should be scanned thoroughly.  I disabled scripts and quickly closed the tab, then visited again in firefox with adblock plus and it's fine, no redirects.  some malicious advertising there, maybe?  anyways, just warning people.<br> <br>
Also, googling zroalert.com didn't find anything much, except that the domain had been registered...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just visited mpd.wikia.org in opera and it redirected to some zroalert.com site " Initializing virus scanner " with a little alert saying my computer was at high risk and should be scanned thoroughly .
I disabled scripts and quickly closed the tab , then visited again in firefox with adblock plus and it 's fine , no redirects .
some malicious advertising there , maybe ?
anyways , just warning people .
Also , googling zroalert.com did n't find anything much , except that the domain had been registered.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just visited mpd.wikia.org in opera and it redirected to some zroalert.com site "Initializing virus scanner" with a little alert saying my computer was at high risk and should be scanned thoroughly.
I disabled scripts and quickly closed the tab, then visited again in firefox with adblock plus and it's fine, no redirects.
some malicious advertising there, maybe?
anyways, just warning people.
Also, googling zroalert.com didn't find anything much, except that the domain had been registered...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832551</id>
	<title>Spotify not ITunes will be the big competitor</title>
	<author>orbitalia</author>
	<datestamp>1256243400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here in Sweden 1 in 5 of the population has a Spotify account. I think Google would do themselves a service by coughing up a huge sum of money and buying Spotify which already has pretty much all music you would want, android, ipod, apple, pc applications, high quality ogg vorbis streams and a very loyal user base.</p><p>Spotify is the next big thing, the US just hasn't seen it yet, their business model is great, and their software works really well.</p><p>Spotify may not be for sale, but Google has deep pockets and a link up would knock out MS and Apple easily I think.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here in Sweden 1 in 5 of the population has a Spotify account .
I think Google would do themselves a service by coughing up a huge sum of money and buying Spotify which already has pretty much all music you would want , android , ipod , apple , pc applications , high quality ogg vorbis streams and a very loyal user base.Spotify is the next big thing , the US just has n't seen it yet , their business model is great , and their software works really well.Spotify may not be for sale , but Google has deep pockets and a link up would knock out MS and Apple easily I think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here in Sweden 1 in 5 of the population has a Spotify account.
I think Google would do themselves a service by coughing up a huge sum of money and buying Spotify which already has pretty much all music you would want, android, ipod, apple, pc applications, high quality ogg vorbis streams and a very loyal user base.Spotify is the next big thing, the US just hasn't seen it yet, their business model is great, and their software works really well.Spotify may not be for sale, but Google has deep pockets and a link up would knock out MS and Apple easily I think.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833551</id>
	<title>Re:Spotify not ITunes will be the big competitor</title>
	<author>orbitalia</author>
	<datestamp>1256214120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hear what you are saying and I agree of course, although there are higher quality streams available in the paid service (the free streams sound better than an average MP3 to me though!).</p><p>The plan is that for the free service they will get paid enough via advertising to make money, so the paid or free is included in their model. I have noticed more frequent adverts in the free service lately though, I think they are tryin to make the free service somewhat less attractive.</p><p>Who wants to "own" music these days anyway, I don't want to buy CD's or files, I want instant access to everything ever recorded at superb quality and with a nice interface wherever I want - as you say with some help for me to find the things I might like.</p><p>They seem to be adding things fast so expect the music you might like to work better in the near future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear what you are saying and I agree of course , although there are higher quality streams available in the paid service ( the free streams sound better than an average MP3 to me though !
) .The plan is that for the free service they will get paid enough via advertising to make money , so the paid or free is included in their model .
I have noticed more frequent adverts in the free service lately though , I think they are tryin to make the free service somewhat less attractive.Who wants to " own " music these days anyway , I do n't want to buy CD 's or files , I want instant access to everything ever recorded at superb quality and with a nice interface wherever I want - as you say with some help for me to find the things I might like.They seem to be adding things fast so expect the music you might like to work better in the near future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear what you are saying and I agree of course, although there are higher quality streams available in the paid service (the free streams sound better than an average MP3 to me though!
).The plan is that for the free service they will get paid enough via advertising to make money, so the paid or free is included in their model.
I have noticed more frequent adverts in the free service lately though, I think they are tryin to make the free service somewhat less attractive.Who wants to "own" music these days anyway, I don't want to buy CD's or files, I want instant access to everything ever recorded at superb quality and with a nice interface wherever I want - as you say with some help for me to find the things I might like.They seem to be adding things fast so expect the music you might like to work better in the near future.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833103</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832829</id>
	<title>Its the start of a new way to sell Android Apps</title>
	<author>phonewebcam</author>
	<datestamp>1256204220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lets face it - the Android Market mechanism itself sucks. If they were gonna do a desktop buy-n-sync system, the iTunes model is the one to follow. Looks like they are just following Apples pattern.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lets face it - the Android Market mechanism itself sucks .
If they were gon na do a desktop buy-n-sync system , the iTunes model is the one to follow .
Looks like they are just following Apples pattern .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lets face it - the Android Market mechanism itself sucks.
If they were gonna do a desktop buy-n-sync system, the iTunes model is the one to follow.
Looks like they are just following Apples pattern.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831851</id>
	<title>Re:What about the player?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256145540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Music Player Daemon (mpd) has the right idea: separate the playing backend and the user interface. The result is an easily-interfaceable (many, many clients for all platforms, web, etc) and reliable player that rarely (never for me) crashes, and will continue to play even if X dies (which makes repairing X a little more enjoyable).
<br> <br>
My favorite client is QMPDClient, which is cross-platform and has a good user interface for easily switching between the Library view (3-section Artist/Album/Songs), the Directories view (which shows the Music directory as a folder tree), and the Playlist view (for saving or loading playlists). The directory view is the big selling point for me, because I have my music folder well organized by genre, artist, album, but not necessarily well organized as far as ID3 tags go.
<br> <br>
Here's a screenshot:
<a href="http://dump.bitcheese.net/images/batidij/qmpdclient-win32.png" title="bitcheese.net">http://dump.bitcheese.net/images/batidij/qmpdclient-win32.png</a> [bitcheese.net]
<br> <br>
It's definitely worth a try...
<br> <br>
MPD: <a href="http://mpd.wikia.com/" title="wikia.com">http://mpd.wikia.com/</a> [wikia.com] <br>
QMPDClient: <a href="http://bitcheese.net/wiki/QMPDClient" title="bitcheese.net">http://bitcheese.net/wiki/QMPDClient</a> [bitcheese.net] <br>
Other MPD Clients: <a href="http://mpd.wikia.com/wiki/Clients" title="wikia.com">http://mpd.wikia.com/wiki/Clients</a> [wikia.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Music Player Daemon ( mpd ) has the right idea : separate the playing backend and the user interface .
The result is an easily-interfaceable ( many , many clients for all platforms , web , etc ) and reliable player that rarely ( never for me ) crashes , and will continue to play even if X dies ( which makes repairing X a little more enjoyable ) .
My favorite client is QMPDClient , which is cross-platform and has a good user interface for easily switching between the Library view ( 3-section Artist/Album/Songs ) , the Directories view ( which shows the Music directory as a folder tree ) , and the Playlist view ( for saving or loading playlists ) .
The directory view is the big selling point for me , because I have my music folder well organized by genre , artist , album , but not necessarily well organized as far as ID3 tags go .
Here 's a screenshot : http : //dump.bitcheese.net/images/batidij/qmpdclient-win32.png [ bitcheese.net ] It 's definitely worth a try.. . MPD : http : //mpd.wikia.com/ [ wikia.com ] QMPDClient : http : //bitcheese.net/wiki/QMPDClient [ bitcheese.net ] Other MPD Clients : http : //mpd.wikia.com/wiki/Clients [ wikia.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Music Player Daemon (mpd) has the right idea: separate the playing backend and the user interface.
The result is an easily-interfaceable (many, many clients for all platforms, web, etc) and reliable player that rarely (never for me) crashes, and will continue to play even if X dies (which makes repairing X a little more enjoyable).
My favorite client is QMPDClient, which is cross-platform and has a good user interface for easily switching between the Library view (3-section Artist/Album/Songs), the Directories view (which shows the Music directory as a folder tree), and the Playlist view (for saving or loading playlists).
The directory view is the big selling point for me, because I have my music folder well organized by genre, artist, album, but not necessarily well organized as far as ID3 tags go.
Here's a screenshot:
http://dump.bitcheese.net/images/batidij/qmpdclient-win32.png [bitcheese.net]
 
It's definitely worth a try...
 
MPD: http://mpd.wikia.com/ [wikia.com] 
QMPDClient: http://bitcheese.net/wiki/QMPDClient [bitcheese.net] 
Other MPD Clients: http://mpd.wikia.com/wiki/Clients [wikia.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29836807</id>
	<title>Re:Please save us Google!</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1256233500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like the fuel economy of Deisel fuel, but my car requires gasoline!!! I'm tired of those restrictive car manufactures telling me what my engine must use and how I can and can't use my own products!</p><p>Yes, you do sound as retarded as that statement.</p><p>You are using an OS that doesn't show up on the radar as more than a large duck, sorry if they don't support it, you knew they didn't when you bought the thing.</p><p>I'm so super pissed that iTunes doesn't run on the OS I wrote, those bastards are restricting my ability to use my devices and using their monopoly in the music player market to crush BitStreamOS!@$!@$  I know its not technically a monopoly or any whever even near it, but I'm going to talk out my ass anyway!@$</p><p>Do you realize how retarded these statements sound to anyone outside of your head?</p><p>Android will replace the iPhone I'm sure<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... just like the Pre or the Storm or whatever the 'iPhone killer' was last week.  You just don't get it.  Apple does, hence why they own the music player market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like the fuel economy of Deisel fuel , but my car requires gasoline ! ! !
I 'm tired of those restrictive car manufactures telling me what my engine must use and how I can and ca n't use my own products ! Yes , you do sound as retarded as that statement.You are using an OS that does n't show up on the radar as more than a large duck , sorry if they do n't support it , you knew they did n't when you bought the thing.I 'm so super pissed that iTunes does n't run on the OS I wrote , those bastards are restricting my ability to use my devices and using their monopoly in the music player market to crush BitStreamOS ! @ $ !
@ $ I know its not technically a monopoly or any whever even near it , but I 'm going to talk out my ass anyway !
@ $ Do you realize how retarded these statements sound to anyone outside of your head ? Android will replace the iPhone I 'm sure ... just like the Pre or the Storm or whatever the 'iPhone killer ' was last week .
You just do n't get it .
Apple does , hence why they own the music player market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like the fuel economy of Deisel fuel, but my car requires gasoline!!!
I'm tired of those restrictive car manufactures telling me what my engine must use and how I can and can't use my own products!Yes, you do sound as retarded as that statement.You are using an OS that doesn't show up on the radar as more than a large duck, sorry if they don't support it, you knew they didn't when you bought the thing.I'm so super pissed that iTunes doesn't run on the OS I wrote, those bastards are restricting my ability to use my devices and using their monopoly in the music player market to crush BitStreamOS!@$!
@$  I know its not technically a monopoly or any whever even near it, but I'm going to talk out my ass anyway!
@$Do you realize how retarded these statements sound to anyone outside of your head?Android will replace the iPhone I'm sure ... just like the Pre or the Storm or whatever the 'iPhone killer' was last week.
You just don't get it.
Apple does, hence why they own the music player market.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835531</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832255</id>
	<title>iTunes store?</title>
	<author>Toonol</author>
	<datestamp>1256151900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I doubt I'd buy music from them any more than I would from the iTunes store... but if they are going to come out with some music and media management software to compete with the iTune software, I'd be very interested.  Every one I've tried, ESPECIALLY iTunes, has been crap... so I'm still organizing all my music in standard file directories and text editing playlists in notepad.<br> <br>

My second thought is... surely Google would be more receptive to indie and non-professional artists?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt I 'd buy music from them any more than I would from the iTunes store... but if they are going to come out with some music and media management software to compete with the iTune software , I 'd be very interested .
Every one I 've tried , ESPECIALLY iTunes , has been crap... so I 'm still organizing all my music in standard file directories and text editing playlists in notepad .
My second thought is... surely Google would be more receptive to indie and non-professional artists ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt I'd buy music from them any more than I would from the iTunes store... but if they are going to come out with some music and media management software to compete with the iTune software, I'd be very interested.
Every one I've tried, ESPECIALLY iTunes, has been crap... so I'm still organizing all my music in standard file directories and text editing playlists in notepad.
My second thought is... surely Google would be more receptive to indie and non-professional artists?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29837489</id>
	<title>Re:Spotify not ITunes will be the big competitor</title>
	<author>Vegeta99</author>
	<datestamp>1256236320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Spotify isn't the only service that has "Huh??" moments. I use Pandora One (Yeah, I paid the $36 for a year so I can skip more than 12 songs a day.), and sometimes, I don't know <i>what</i> it was thinking.</p><p>Actually, Pandora's worst offense is about the same as what you're saying about Spotify. I have a station defined as "Rob Zombie + Tool", and then about 100 songs that I've thumb-upped or down as they've played. It will do the same thing, "Now that you've enjoyed 3 hours of the station that you designed to only play this genre right now, here's some Kanye West!" The asshole DJ that would play a random pop song in the middle of a Doors marathon lives on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Spotify is n't the only service that has " Huh ? ?
" moments .
I use Pandora One ( Yeah , I paid the $ 36 for a year so I can skip more than 12 songs a day .
) , and sometimes , I do n't know what it was thinking.Actually , Pandora 's worst offense is about the same as what you 're saying about Spotify .
I have a station defined as " Rob Zombie + Tool " , and then about 100 songs that I 've thumb-upped or down as they 've played .
It will do the same thing , " Now that you 've enjoyed 3 hours of the station that you designed to only play this genre right now , here 's some Kanye West !
" The asshole DJ that would play a random pop song in the middle of a Doors marathon lives on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spotify isn't the only service that has "Huh??
" moments.
I use Pandora One (Yeah, I paid the $36 for a year so I can skip more than 12 songs a day.
), and sometimes, I don't know what it was thinking.Actually, Pandora's worst offense is about the same as what you're saying about Spotify.
I have a station defined as "Rob Zombie + Tool", and then about 100 songs that I've thumb-upped or down as they've played.
It will do the same thing, "Now that you've enjoyed 3 hours of the station that you designed to only play this genre right now, here's some Kanye West!
" The asshole DJ that would play a random pop song in the middle of a Doors marathon lives on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833103</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832069</id>
	<title>Re:Why audio?</title>
	<author>GoochOwnsYou</author>
	<datestamp>1256148900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did you the same thing to Apple when they got into the music business? or in the phone business? <br> <br>

Android has alot of potential, ChromeOS I am yet to be sold on the idea of cloud based desktops but time will tell. Lets not forget Apple made computers and operating systems. What are they doing in the music business? Or the Phone business? Because there is a market there. Do you really think Apple is entitled to a monopoly?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you the same thing to Apple when they got into the music business ?
or in the phone business ?
Android has alot of potential , ChromeOS I am yet to be sold on the idea of cloud based desktops but time will tell .
Lets not forget Apple made computers and operating systems .
What are they doing in the music business ?
Or the Phone business ?
Because there is a market there .
Do you really think Apple is entitled to a monopoly ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you the same thing to Apple when they got into the music business?
or in the phone business?
Android has alot of potential, ChromeOS I am yet to be sold on the idea of cloud based desktops but time will tell.
Lets not forget Apple made computers and operating systems.
What are they doing in the music business?
Or the Phone business?
Because there is a market there.
Do you really think Apple is entitled to a monopoly?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831841</id>
	<title>Re:Its a Fractal</title>
	<author>GaryPatterson</author>
	<datestamp>1256145480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Apple has done very well with the iPhone, but if history is our guide, they did very well with the original Macintosh.</i></p><p>Not any version of history I've seen. The Mac struggled for a while before finding a niche in desktop publishing, where it languished while PC-compatible machines caught up, overtook it and took over the world. The desktop metaphor took over the computing world, but mostly through Windows.</p><p>History is no guide, unless you believe the players have learnt nothing from it.</p><p><i>Steve Jobs is too obsessed with removing buttons from mice</i></p><p>Like many commentators, you've missed the point. He is focused on quality, and the vision he has for Apple seems to include removing anything that detracts from that goal. I can't say if he's 'obsessed' as I don't personally know the man.</p><p>Back on topic - competition is great. Now that Apple have pushed back the limits on music purchasing and pushed DRM off the table (aided greatly by Amazon), players like Google can step up and provide a music ecosystem similar to iTunes. Hopefully Google will include new features that draw users towards their product, stimulating Apple to work harder to compete.</p><p>I hope Google produce something amazing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple has done very well with the iPhone , but if history is our guide , they did very well with the original Macintosh.Not any version of history I 've seen .
The Mac struggled for a while before finding a niche in desktop publishing , where it languished while PC-compatible machines caught up , overtook it and took over the world .
The desktop metaphor took over the computing world , but mostly through Windows.History is no guide , unless you believe the players have learnt nothing from it.Steve Jobs is too obsessed with removing buttons from miceLike many commentators , you 've missed the point .
He is focused on quality , and the vision he has for Apple seems to include removing anything that detracts from that goal .
I ca n't say if he 's 'obsessed ' as I do n't personally know the man.Back on topic - competition is great .
Now that Apple have pushed back the limits on music purchasing and pushed DRM off the table ( aided greatly by Amazon ) , players like Google can step up and provide a music ecosystem similar to iTunes .
Hopefully Google will include new features that draw users towards their product , stimulating Apple to work harder to compete.I hope Google produce something amazing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple has done very well with the iPhone, but if history is our guide, they did very well with the original Macintosh.Not any version of history I've seen.
The Mac struggled for a while before finding a niche in desktop publishing, where it languished while PC-compatible machines caught up, overtook it and took over the world.
The desktop metaphor took over the computing world, but mostly through Windows.History is no guide, unless you believe the players have learnt nothing from it.Steve Jobs is too obsessed with removing buttons from miceLike many commentators, you've missed the point.
He is focused on quality, and the vision he has for Apple seems to include removing anything that detracts from that goal.
I can't say if he's 'obsessed' as I don't personally know the man.Back on topic - competition is great.
Now that Apple have pushed back the limits on music purchasing and pushed DRM off the table (aided greatly by Amazon), players like Google can step up and provide a music ecosystem similar to iTunes.
Hopefully Google will include new features that draw users towards their product, stimulating Apple to work harder to compete.I hope Google produce something amazing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29837123</id>
	<title>Re:What about the player?</title>
	<author>BrentH</author>
	<datestamp>1256234880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How do I run MPD on windows?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do I run MPD on windows ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do I run MPD on windows?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831851</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831817</id>
	<title>Re:Its a Fractal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256145120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Macintosh market share is growing.  In a recession.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Macintosh market share is growing .
In a recession .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Macintosh market share is growing.
In a recession.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831899</id>
	<title>No</title>
	<author>mr100percent</author>
	<datestamp>1256146320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is Google about to go head to head with iTunes? No, but they are about to go head-to-head with Amazon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is Google about to go head to head with iTunes ?
No , but they are about to go head-to-head with Amazon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is Google about to go head to head with iTunes?
No, but they are about to go head-to-head with Amazon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832095</id>
	<title>Re:WSJ reports that it's NOT competition for iTune</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256149260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I welcome any alternative to the iTunes Store interface. Considering that Apple prides itself on its intelligent and intuitive user interfaces, the iTunes Store boggles my mind. I gave my father a gift certificate to buy some songs for his iPod, but he got frustrated quickly and handed the controls over to me. After a few minutes of navigating the slow, labyrinthine interface myself, I threw in the towel and got the songs he wanted through other channels. If not for the luxury of being so tightly integrated with the hardware and iTunes itself, I doubt Apple could get away with pushing something so clunky. Hopefully, Google can remedy that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I welcome any alternative to the iTunes Store interface .
Considering that Apple prides itself on its intelligent and intuitive user interfaces , the iTunes Store boggles my mind .
I gave my father a gift certificate to buy some songs for his iPod , but he got frustrated quickly and handed the controls over to me .
After a few minutes of navigating the slow , labyrinthine interface myself , I threw in the towel and got the songs he wanted through other channels .
If not for the luxury of being so tightly integrated with the hardware and iTunes itself , I doubt Apple could get away with pushing something so clunky .
Hopefully , Google can remedy that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I welcome any alternative to the iTunes Store interface.
Considering that Apple prides itself on its intelligent and intuitive user interfaces, the iTunes Store boggles my mind.
I gave my father a gift certificate to buy some songs for his iPod, but he got frustrated quickly and handed the controls over to me.
After a few minutes of navigating the slow, labyrinthine interface myself, I threw in the towel and got the songs he wanted through other channels.
If not for the luxury of being so tightly integrated with the hardware and iTunes itself, I doubt Apple could get away with pushing something so clunky.
Hopefully, Google can remedy that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833055</id>
	<title>Re:It's a music search feature</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1256207520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, it's more of a rival to Spotify, then? Stream music, offer links to purchase.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , it 's more of a rival to Spotify , then ?
Stream music , offer links to purchase .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, it's more of a rival to Spotify, then?
Stream music, offer links to purchase.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831843</id>
	<title>Lala</title>
	<author>BlueBoxSW.com</author>
	<datestamp>1256145480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope it's not a crappy knock-off, like when they launched Google Video.</p><p>Even the goodwill of their name couldn't save that horrible site.</p><p>No wonder a couple months later they bought YouTube.</p><p>This time maybe they'll buy Lala.com.</p><p>If you want a good browser-based iTunes store, that's it.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope it 's not a crappy knock-off , like when they launched Google Video.Even the goodwill of their name could n't save that horrible site.No wonder a couple months later they bought YouTube.This time maybe they 'll buy Lala.com.If you want a good browser-based iTunes store , that 's it .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope it's not a crappy knock-off, like when they launched Google Video.Even the goodwill of their name couldn't save that horrible site.No wonder a couple months later they bought YouTube.This time maybe they'll buy Lala.com.If you want a good browser-based iTunes store, that's it.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832573</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously - is Google innovative at all?</title>
	<author>pudro</author>
	<datestamp>1256243640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>All this hype about omgz Google is so innovative.  Let's take a step back and see what they have actually created shall we?l</p><p>...</p><p>So all you fanbois - with all the fanfare and hype - what exactly has Google really invented or developed that is so way out there?</p></div><p>Your problem here is clear - you don't know the difference between innovation and invention.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All this hype about omgz Google is so innovative .
Let 's take a step back and see what they have actually created shall we ? l...So all you fanbois - with all the fanfare and hype - what exactly has Google really invented or developed that is so way out there ? Your problem here is clear - you do n't know the difference between innovation and invention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All this hype about omgz Google is so innovative.
Let's take a step back and see what they have actually created shall we?l...So all you fanbois - with all the fanfare and hype - what exactly has Google really invented or developed that is so way out there?Your problem here is clear - you don't know the difference between innovation and invention.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832071</id>
	<title>What's with the tags?</title>
	<author>Nebulious</author>
	<datestamp>1256148900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A story is posted about Google apparently engaging in some healthy (and frankly long needed) competition against Apple/Amazon, and the tags we get are 'donoevil,' 'queuethefanbois,' and 'fuckgoogle.'  At least someone came along and put a ! in front of the last one but the tag being there at all is an artifact of seriously unconstructive vitriol.  This is a story about Google expanding into new markets, not about Google doing anything wrong.  These tags must be here accidentally at best and as flamebait at the worst.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A story is posted about Google apparently engaging in some healthy ( and frankly long needed ) competition against Apple/Amazon , and the tags we get are 'donoevil, ' 'queuethefanbois, ' and 'fuckgoogle .
' At least someone came along and put a !
in front of the last one but the tag being there at all is an artifact of seriously unconstructive vitriol .
This is a story about Google expanding into new markets , not about Google doing anything wrong .
These tags must be here accidentally at best and as flamebait at the worst .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A story is posted about Google apparently engaging in some healthy (and frankly long needed) competition against Apple/Amazon, and the tags we get are 'donoevil,' 'queuethefanbois,' and 'fuckgoogle.
'  At least someone came along and put a !
in front of the last one but the tag being there at all is an artifact of seriously unconstructive vitriol.
This is a story about Google expanding into new markets, not about Google doing anything wrong.
These tags must be here accidentally at best and as flamebait at the worst.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831947</id>
	<title>A little sample of what's to come</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256147100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>Google audio (BETA)</b></p><p><b>Lyric Search:</b> Carry a laser down the road that I must travel</p><p><i>Did you mean: Kyrie eleison down the road that I must travel?</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google audio ( BETA ) Lyric Search : Carry a laser down the road that I must travelDid you mean : Kyrie eleison down the road that I must travel ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google audio (BETA)Lyric Search: Carry a laser down the road that I must travelDid you mean: Kyrie eleison down the road that I must travel?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831751</id>
	<title>Got a pussy in my panties</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256144400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She got a pussy in her panties<br>She wore a pussy thong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831689</id>
	<title>iGoons!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256143740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the name should be iGoons</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the name should be iGoons</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the name should be iGoons</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29838029</id>
	<title>Re:What about the player?</title>
	<author>WiiVault</author>
	<datestamp>1256238360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While I love Picasa as well I don't get why an obvious troll would get a +5 mod. What about iPhoto is particularly terrible?</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I love Picasa as well I do n't get why an obvious troll would get a + 5 mod .
What about iPhoto is particularly terrible ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I love Picasa as well I don't get why an obvious troll would get a +5 mod.
What about iPhoto is particularly terrible?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833753</id>
	<title>FREE (as in beer) MUSIC!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256216700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes!!! Google getting involved can only mean one thing: free music with less privacy! YAHOOOOOO!!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes ! ! !
Google getting involved can only mean one thing : free music with less privacy !
YAHOOOOOO ! ! ! ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes!!!
Google getting involved can only mean one thing: free music with less privacy!
YAHOOOOOO!!!!!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831997</id>
	<title>Why audio?</title>
	<author>MahariBalzitch</author>
	<datestamp>1256147760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why doesn't Google stop delving into all these other markets and just stick to what it knows?:  SEARCH. I can just see the day in the near future that Google is disliked as much as Microsoft because it was being a monopoly.

Good things never last unfortunately...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does n't Google stop delving into all these other markets and just stick to what it knows ?
: SEARCH .
I can just see the day in the near future that Google is disliked as much as Microsoft because it was being a monopoly .
Good things never last unfortunately.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why doesn't Google stop delving into all these other markets and just stick to what it knows?
:  SEARCH.
I can just see the day in the near future that Google is disliked as much as Microsoft because it was being a monopoly.
Good things never last unfortunately...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832805</id>
	<title>amen!  lol</title>
	<author>Weezul</author>
	<datestamp>1256203920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except Apple has always been fashion darling, not a tech darling.  Indeed, Apple's technology is always fairly far behind, but Jobs' 1-button obsession does create fashion conscious products.  Apple will always find users who'll pay more for fewer features when existing features are presented more fashionably.</p><p>I dislike the closed source culture surrounding Apple's computers and strongly dislike the iPhone's restrictions, but Apple's fashion awareness has helped many people.  Just look how Apple made incremental back up fashionable.  Can you imagine how much time and how many irreplaceable family photo albums that move has saved?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except Apple has always been fashion darling , not a tech darling .
Indeed , Apple 's technology is always fairly far behind , but Jobs ' 1-button obsession does create fashion conscious products .
Apple will always find users who 'll pay more for fewer features when existing features are presented more fashionably.I dislike the closed source culture surrounding Apple 's computers and strongly dislike the iPhone 's restrictions , but Apple 's fashion awareness has helped many people .
Just look how Apple made incremental back up fashionable .
Can you imagine how much time and how many irreplaceable family photo albums that move has saved ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except Apple has always been fashion darling, not a tech darling.
Indeed, Apple's technology is always fairly far behind, but Jobs' 1-button obsession does create fashion conscious products.
Apple will always find users who'll pay more for fewer features when existing features are presented more fashionably.I dislike the closed source culture surrounding Apple's computers and strongly dislike the iPhone's restrictions, but Apple's fashion awareness has helped many people.
Just look how Apple made incremental back up fashionable.
Can you imagine how much time and how many irreplaceable family photo albums that move has saved?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832399</id>
	<title>Re:Its a Fractal</title>
	<author>Saint Fnordius</author>
	<datestamp>1256154000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I disagree with you as far as the online music sales monopoly goes: Apple's real interest isn't in dominating the online music store business as much as it is maintaining dominance in the music player business. They want to sell iPods first, and the online store is merely an accessory. So no, I don't think Apple would retaliate by banning Google apps, especially if it could hurt sales of iPhones and iPods in any way. The music store is a valuable chess piece, but one Apple would sacrifice to protect the more important pieces on the board.</p><p>I also think Apple is aware that this dominance cannot last forever, but their long-term strategy has always been to find what tech is a great idea if it only had a polished user interface, and give it a UI that makes it suddenly cool. Google's strategy is similar, but slightly different. Google's strategy is all about developing new ways for people to find and use the information that is out there, be it web sites, books, photos or music. The difference between the two companies is that Apple is concerned about the hardware and devices, whereas Google is focussed more on the software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I disagree with you as far as the online music sales monopoly goes : Apple 's real interest is n't in dominating the online music store business as much as it is maintaining dominance in the music player business .
They want to sell iPods first , and the online store is merely an accessory .
So no , I do n't think Apple would retaliate by banning Google apps , especially if it could hurt sales of iPhones and iPods in any way .
The music store is a valuable chess piece , but one Apple would sacrifice to protect the more important pieces on the board.I also think Apple is aware that this dominance can not last forever , but their long-term strategy has always been to find what tech is a great idea if it only had a polished user interface , and give it a UI that makes it suddenly cool .
Google 's strategy is similar , but slightly different .
Google 's strategy is all about developing new ways for people to find and use the information that is out there , be it web sites , books , photos or music .
The difference between the two companies is that Apple is concerned about the hardware and devices , whereas Google is focussed more on the software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I disagree with you as far as the online music sales monopoly goes: Apple's real interest isn't in dominating the online music store business as much as it is maintaining dominance in the music player business.
They want to sell iPods first, and the online store is merely an accessory.
So no, I don't think Apple would retaliate by banning Google apps, especially if it could hurt sales of iPhones and iPods in any way.
The music store is a valuable chess piece, but one Apple would sacrifice to protect the more important pieces on the board.I also think Apple is aware that this dominance cannot last forever, but their long-term strategy has always been to find what tech is a great idea if it only had a polished user interface, and give it a UI that makes it suddenly cool.
Google's strategy is similar, but slightly different.
Google's strategy is all about developing new ways for people to find and use the information that is out there, be it web sites, books, photos or music.
The difference between the two companies is that Apple is concerned about the hardware and devices, whereas Google is focussed more on the software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29838153</id>
	<title>Re:Spotify not ITunes will be the big competitor</title>
	<author>WiiVault</author>
	<datestamp>1256238900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Spotify would knock out MS and Apple easily? Really? Thats a load. Spotify is cool sure, but in the end hardly innovative or original.  1 in 5 in Sweden mans next to nothing to a company like Google.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Spotify would knock out MS and Apple easily ?
Really ? Thats a load .
Spotify is cool sure , but in the end hardly innovative or original .
1 in 5 in Sweden mans next to nothing to a company like Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spotify would knock out MS and Apple easily?
Really? Thats a load.
Spotify is cool sure, but in the end hardly innovative or original.
1 in 5 in Sweden mans next to nothing to a company like Google.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29843313</id>
	<title>It already exists...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256241000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..in China. music.google.cn is one the online music providers in China.<br>Only in China they have some agreement with the audio companies and they provide all musics for free.</p><p>Anonymously posted from the other side of the Great Firewall.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..in China .
music.google.cn is one the online music providers in China.Only in China they have some agreement with the audio companies and they provide all musics for free.Anonymously posted from the other side of the Great Firewall .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>..in China.
music.google.cn is one the online music providers in China.Only in China they have some agreement with the audio companies and they provide all musics for free.Anonymously posted from the other side of the Great Firewall.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832407</id>
	<title>Re:Why audio?</title>
	<author>Techman83</author>
	<datestamp>1256154060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Diversification makes sense in a business, it means if one section is doing poorly, the other sections can keep the business afloat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Diversification makes sense in a business , it means if one section is doing poorly , the other sections can keep the business afloat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Diversification makes sense in a business, it means if one section is doing poorly, the other sections can keep the business afloat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831997</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29838153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832037
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29858981
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832749
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833739
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831713
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831743
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833797
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834379
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832677
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29836687
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29838185
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835237
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29838203
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833029
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835877
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831713
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832075
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834861
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835415
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833579
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29838029
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832857
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29837463
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29837489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835531
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29836807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29840923
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833551
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831839
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834589
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832095
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29842227
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832085
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29836245
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834941
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831713
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831819
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834331
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832459
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832407
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29836999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831947
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29837909
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29837123
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832805
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831813
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833055
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835909
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834807
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834557
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_239247_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_239247.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835531
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29836807
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29840923
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_239247.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835237
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29838203
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_239247.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831947
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29837909
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_239247.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831681
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_239247.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831725
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831851
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833029
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832785
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29837123
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835489
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832749
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834941
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834861
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29838029
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831825
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834807
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29837463
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834935
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834611
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29858981
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831911
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832085
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832037
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_239247.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831795
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833489
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832677
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832857
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29836245
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832095
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_239247.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832071
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832347
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_239247.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832551
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29836687
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835909
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29838153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835569
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833103
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833797
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833739
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833551
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29837489
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29836999
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_239247.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831769
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832805
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833579
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831817
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831841
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835415
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832459
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832435
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831921
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832015
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832159
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835877
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29842227
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833541
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834379
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834557
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833793
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832573
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832023
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29835243
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834331
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_239247.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831839
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29834589
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_239247.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831689
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_239247.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833095
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29838185
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_239247.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831899
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_239247.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831713
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831743
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832075
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831819
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_239247.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831997
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832471
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832407
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832069
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29832419
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_239247.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29831813
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_239247.29833055
</commentlist>
</conversation>
