<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_19_2147254</id>
	<title>What Desktop Search Engine For a Shared Volume?</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1255949100000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>kriston writes <i>'Searching data on a shared volume is tedious.  If I try to use a Windows desktop search engine on a volume with hundreds of gigabytes the indexing process takes days and the search results are slow and unsatisfying.  I'm thinking of an agent that runs on the server that regularly indexes and talks to the desktop machines running the search interface.  How do you integrate your desktop search application with your remote file server without forcing each desktop to index the hundred gigabyte volume on its own?'</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>kriston writes 'Searching data on a shared volume is tedious .
If I try to use a Windows desktop search engine on a volume with hundreds of gigabytes the indexing process takes days and the search results are slow and unsatisfying .
I 'm thinking of an agent that runs on the server that regularly indexes and talks to the desktop machines running the search interface .
How do you integrate your desktop search application with your remote file server without forcing each desktop to index the hundred gigabyte volume on its own ?
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>kriston writes 'Searching data on a shared volume is tedious.
If I try to use a Windows desktop search engine on a volume with hundreds of gigabytes the indexing process takes days and the search results are slow and unsatisfying.
I'm thinking of an agent that runs on the server that regularly indexes and talks to the desktop machines running the search interface.
How do you integrate your desktop search application with your remote file server without forcing each desktop to index the hundred gigabyte volume on its own?
'</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804221</id>
	<title>Re:Federated Search</title>
	<author>bhpaddock</author>
	<datestamp>1255974780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually it's quite relevant.  Windows 7 can federate queries to a SharePoint or Search Server index using OpenSearch.</p><p>Also, Windows Vista and Win7 (and even XP with WS4 to some extent) can query remote Windows Search indexes.  I use this functionality along with my Windows Home Server (running WS4) for my personal needs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually it 's quite relevant .
Windows 7 can federate queries to a SharePoint or Search Server index using OpenSearch.Also , Windows Vista and Win7 ( and even XP with WS4 to some extent ) can query remote Windows Search indexes .
I use this functionality along with my Windows Home Server ( running WS4 ) for my personal needs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually it's quite relevant.
Windows 7 can federate queries to a SharePoint or Search Server index using OpenSearch.Also, Windows Vista and Win7 (and even XP with WS4 to some extent) can query remote Windows Search indexes.
I use this functionality along with my Windows Home Server (running WS4) for my personal needs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803383</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804931</id>
	<title>Re:A couple of options</title>
	<author>blowdart</author>
	<datestamp>1256071380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh well, if we're recommending MS solutions on slashdot (ah karma suicide) then good old Windows Desktop Search works just as well. Since V4.0 came out you can have WDS on other machines, indexing away and it's the remote index that is queried - so no need for local machines to index remote shares. Plus, like sharepoint (spit) indexing, and Index Server before that it uses iFilters, so format aware indexing is available for most of the common formats a business uses.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh well , if we 're recommending MS solutions on slashdot ( ah karma suicide ) then good old Windows Desktop Search works just as well .
Since V4.0 came out you can have WDS on other machines , indexing away and it 's the remote index that is queried - so no need for local machines to index remote shares .
Plus , like sharepoint ( spit ) indexing , and Index Server before that it uses iFilters , so format aware indexing is available for most of the common formats a business uses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh well, if we're recommending MS solutions on slashdot (ah karma suicide) then good old Windows Desktop Search works just as well.
Since V4.0 came out you can have WDS on other machines, indexing away and it's the remote index that is queried - so no need for local machines to index remote shares.
Plus, like sharepoint (spit) indexing, and Index Server before that it uses iFilters, so format aware indexing is available for most of the common formats a business uses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801353</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803885</id>
	<title>Re:Call the NSA</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1255970820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Or the RIAA...  (assuming said shared volume contains MP3s)..  not only do they have it indexed for you,  but they'll conveniently mail the list to you in the form of a letter with a bunch of legal sounding junk  at no upfront cost to you.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or the RIAA... ( assuming said shared volume contains MP3s ) .. not only do they have it indexed for you , but they 'll conveniently mail the list to you in the form of a letter with a bunch of legal sounding junk at no upfront cost to you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Or the RIAA...  (assuming said shared volume contains MP3s)..  not only do they have it indexed for you,  but they'll conveniently mail the list to you in the form of a letter with a bunch of legal sounding junk  at no upfront cost to you.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29829239</id>
	<title>Re:wow!</title>
	<author>Zotdogg</author>
	<datestamp>1256122140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Sharepoint does this"....<br>
<br>
COME ON! I can't believe Sharepoint is even being referenced as an even half-way acceptable solution to provide a search method for remote volumes with LESS overhead. Not only would you have to install the broken piece of shit known as Sharepoint and all it's overhead componentry but you would also have to make all kinds of changes to your existing computing system(s) as a whole that would serve no necessary purpose other than sinking MS's (not biased enough to use a $) teeth further in to your system and enabling a system that BARELY works anyhow.<br>
<br>
The best solution looks to be the one Blowdart posted below:<br>
<i>"Oh well, if we're recommending MS solutions on slashdot (ah karma suicide) then good old Windows Desktop Search works just as well. Since V4.0 came out you can have WDS on other machines, indexing away and it's the remote index that is queried - so no need for local machines to index remote shares. Plus, like sharepoint (spit) indexing, and Index Server before that it uses iFilters, so format aware indexing is available for most of the common formats a business uses."</i> <br>
<br>
See, not necessarily biased against Microsoft. I'm just biased against good-for-nothing, useless, waste of time, expensive, over-hyped, retarded, cock-gurgling, card-tabled, takes-you-12-times-as-long-to-set-up-and-do-half-the-work-as-not-using-it software.<br>
<br>
Seriously, shame on anyone suggesting Sharepoint as a solution to this question! WTF!?!?!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Sharepoint does this " ... . COME ON !
I ca n't believe Sharepoint is even being referenced as an even half-way acceptable solution to provide a search method for remote volumes with LESS overhead .
Not only would you have to install the broken piece of shit known as Sharepoint and all it 's overhead componentry but you would also have to make all kinds of changes to your existing computing system ( s ) as a whole that would serve no necessary purpose other than sinking MS 's ( not biased enough to use a $ ) teeth further in to your system and enabling a system that BARELY works anyhow .
The best solution looks to be the one Blowdart posted below : " Oh well , if we 're recommending MS solutions on slashdot ( ah karma suicide ) then good old Windows Desktop Search works just as well .
Since V4.0 came out you can have WDS on other machines , indexing away and it 's the remote index that is queried - so no need for local machines to index remote shares .
Plus , like sharepoint ( spit ) indexing , and Index Server before that it uses iFilters , so format aware indexing is available for most of the common formats a business uses .
" See , not necessarily biased against Microsoft .
I 'm just biased against good-for-nothing , useless , waste of time , expensive , over-hyped , retarded , cock-gurgling , card-tabled , takes-you-12-times-as-long-to-set-up-and-do-half-the-work-as-not-using-it software .
Seriously , shame on anyone suggesting Sharepoint as a solution to this question !
WTF ! ? ! ? ! ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Sharepoint does this"....

COME ON!
I can't believe Sharepoint is even being referenced as an even half-way acceptable solution to provide a search method for remote volumes with LESS overhead.
Not only would you have to install the broken piece of shit known as Sharepoint and all it's overhead componentry but you would also have to make all kinds of changes to your existing computing system(s) as a whole that would serve no necessary purpose other than sinking MS's (not biased enough to use a $) teeth further in to your system and enabling a system that BARELY works anyhow.
The best solution looks to be the one Blowdart posted below:
"Oh well, if we're recommending MS solutions on slashdot (ah karma suicide) then good old Windows Desktop Search works just as well.
Since V4.0 came out you can have WDS on other machines, indexing away and it's the remote index that is queried - so no need for local machines to index remote shares.
Plus, like sharepoint (spit) indexing, and Index Server before that it uses iFilters, so format aware indexing is available for most of the common formats a business uses.
" 

See, not necessarily biased against Microsoft.
I'm just biased against good-for-nothing, useless, waste of time, expensive, over-hyped, retarded, cock-gurgling, card-tabled, takes-you-12-times-as-long-to-set-up-and-do-half-the-work-as-not-using-it software.
Seriously, shame on anyone suggesting Sharepoint as a solution to this question!
WTF!?!?!!!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802895</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802439</id>
	<title>Portfolio Server (Digital Asset Management)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255959180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(Disclaimer: I work for Extensis)</p><p>Portfolio Server can continuously index files on SMB/CIFS (and AFP) volumes using a feature called "AutoSync". Web and Desktop (Windows/Mac) clients then search by folder name, file name, document text, or other metadata. Indexing and thumbnail creation takes place on the server, so clients are relieved of any cataloging workload and metadata is centralized.</p><p>http://www.extensis.com/en/products/portfolioserver9/overview.jsp</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( Disclaimer : I work for Extensis ) Portfolio Server can continuously index files on SMB/CIFS ( and AFP ) volumes using a feature called " AutoSync " .
Web and Desktop ( Windows/Mac ) clients then search by folder name , file name , document text , or other metadata .
Indexing and thumbnail creation takes place on the server , so clients are relieved of any cataloging workload and metadata is centralized.http : //www.extensis.com/en/products/portfolioserver9/overview.jsp</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(Disclaimer: I work for Extensis)Portfolio Server can continuously index files on SMB/CIFS (and AFP) volumes using a feature called "AutoSync".
Web and Desktop (Windows/Mac) clients then search by folder name, file name, document text, or other metadata.
Indexing and thumbnail creation takes place on the server, so clients are relieved of any cataloging workload and metadata is centralized.http://www.extensis.com/en/products/portfolioserver9/overview.jsp</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803383</id>
	<title>Re:Federated Search</title>
	<author>endr</author>
	<datestamp>1255966080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>MS does have a solution, it's called Windows Federated Search.  Windows 7 with 2008R2 has it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. there might be a way to do with Windows Desktop Search 4.0.  Here's some info on it - <a href="http://geekswithblogs.net/sdorman/archive/2009/05/14/windows-7-federated-search.aspx" title="geekswithblogs.net" rel="nofollow">http://geekswithblogs.net/sdorman/archive/2009/05/14/windows-7-federated-search.aspx</a> [geekswithblogs.net] </p></div><p>You don't know what you're talking about, Federated Search has nothing to do with this; it's just a system for search plugins in Explorer. (link: <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd940456(VS.85).aspx" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd940456(VS.85).aspx</a> [microsoft.com] )</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>MS does have a solution , it 's called Windows Federated Search .
Windows 7 with 2008R2 has it .. there might be a way to do with Windows Desktop Search 4.0 .
Here 's some info on it - http : //geekswithblogs.net/sdorman/archive/2009/05/14/windows-7-federated-search.aspx [ geekswithblogs.net ] You do n't know what you 're talking about , Federated Search has nothing to do with this ; it 's just a system for search plugins in Explorer .
( link : http : //msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd940456 ( VS.85 ) .aspx [ microsoft.com ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MS does have a solution, it's called Windows Federated Search.
Windows 7 with 2008R2 has it .. there might be a way to do with Windows Desktop Search 4.0.
Here's some info on it - http://geekswithblogs.net/sdorman/archive/2009/05/14/windows-7-federated-search.aspx [geekswithblogs.net] You don't know what you're talking about, Federated Search has nothing to do with this; it's just a system for search plugins in Explorer.
(link: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd940456(VS.85).aspx [microsoft.com] )
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801375</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801527</id>
	<title>How about Spotlight? That works on shared volumes.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255953720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*ducks*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* ducks *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*ducks*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29805345</id>
	<title>Re:How about Spotlight? That works on shared volum</title>
	<author>gd23ka</author>
	<datestamp>1256034360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Spotlight is the obvious answer if you have OS X. Not everybody in the world is lucky enough to be in that<br>position, most are stuck on one of the inferior platforms. Your rubbing it in, is not helping it just<br>alienates people who already have been through enough and have it tough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Spotlight is the obvious answer if you have OS X. Not everybody in the world is lucky enough to be in thatposition , most are stuck on one of the inferior platforms .
Your rubbing it in , is not helping it justalienates people who already have been through enough and have it tough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spotlight is the obvious answer if you have OS X. Not everybody in the world is lucky enough to be in thatposition, most are stuck on one of the inferior platforms.
Your rubbing it in, is not helping it justalienates people who already have been through enough and have it tough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801775</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803633</id>
	<title>Google Search Appliance is the way</title>
	<author>wizact</author>
	<datestamp>1255968360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>GSA is the best way for enterprise search! It crawls, index and servers data. About a concern one of guys reaised above about access control. It authenticate you against the current authentication server (NTLM, Kerberos, LDAP, etc) and only shows you results that you are eligible to see that.
Oh wait. There is one hiccup there. Licensing sucks. It is based on number of documents it crawls and after 2 or 3 years you should take back your appliance and buy a new one!</htmltext>
<tokenext>GSA is the best way for enterprise search !
It crawls , index and servers data .
About a concern one of guys reaised above about access control .
It authenticate you against the current authentication server ( NTLM , Kerberos , LDAP , etc ) and only shows you results that you are eligible to see that .
Oh wait .
There is one hiccup there .
Licensing sucks .
It is based on number of documents it crawls and after 2 or 3 years you should take back your appliance and buy a new one !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GSA is the best way for enterprise search!
It crawls, index and servers data.
About a concern one of guys reaised above about access control.
It authenticate you against the current authentication server (NTLM, Kerberos, LDAP, etc) and only shows you results that you are eligible to see that.
Oh wait.
There is one hiccup there.
Licensing sucks.
It is based on number of documents it crawls and after 2 or 3 years you should take back your appliance and buy a new one!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801775</id>
	<title>Re:How about Spotlight? That works on shared volum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255955100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, my thought exactly? I wasn't aware that it was a problem searching hundreds of gigabytes on shared volumes. We have a couple of terabytes shared by our Mac servers and I don't think I've had search times longer than ten seconds over a couple of million files.. MS Office files, PDFs, movies, audio, pictures, photographs, text, HTML, source code.. all indexed with metadata and contents.</p><p>Even the days before Spotlight, using AppleShare IP Servers in the 90s, finding stuff on the servers was never an issue. It has always been so fast that I have never even reflected over that it was fast. Maybe I should use some other operating system once in a while to experience what the majority experiences. Or not.. I'd rather stay care free and productive.</p><p>Don't call me when you figure this out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , my thought exactly ?
I was n't aware that it was a problem searching hundreds of gigabytes on shared volumes .
We have a couple of terabytes shared by our Mac servers and I do n't think I 've had search times longer than ten seconds over a couple of million files.. MS Office files , PDFs , movies , audio , pictures , photographs , text , HTML , source code.. all indexed with metadata and contents.Even the days before Spotlight , using AppleShare IP Servers in the 90s , finding stuff on the servers was never an issue .
It has always been so fast that I have never even reflected over that it was fast .
Maybe I should use some other operating system once in a while to experience what the majority experiences .
Or not.. I 'd rather stay care free and productive.Do n't call me when you figure this out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, my thought exactly?
I wasn't aware that it was a problem searching hundreds of gigabytes on shared volumes.
We have a couple of terabytes shared by our Mac servers and I don't think I've had search times longer than ten seconds over a couple of million files.. MS Office files, PDFs, movies, audio, pictures, photographs, text, HTML, source code.. all indexed with metadata and contents.Even the days before Spotlight, using AppleShare IP Servers in the 90s, finding stuff on the servers was never an issue.
It has always been so fast that I have never even reflected over that it was fast.
Maybe I should use some other operating system once in a while to experience what the majority experiences.
Or not.. I'd rather stay care free and productive.Don't call me when you figure this out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801527</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802809</id>
	<title>No simple options</title>
	<author>benjamindees</author>
	<datestamp>1255961640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since this is a task that benefits from some optimization, there are so many different combinations of file servers/clients out there, and so many use cases to choose from, there are lots of different solutions but not many good ones that will do exactly what you want out of the box.</p><p>So, in order to narrow it down, you need to decide exactly what you're looking for.  What server are you using?  What clients do you need to support?  Are you wanting to just search file names, or contents, ownership and modification times as well?  Do you need the index to be completely up-to-date, or not?  How long can you stand to wait for results?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since this is a task that benefits from some optimization , there are so many different combinations of file servers/clients out there , and so many use cases to choose from , there are lots of different solutions but not many good ones that will do exactly what you want out of the box.So , in order to narrow it down , you need to decide exactly what you 're looking for .
What server are you using ?
What clients do you need to support ?
Are you wanting to just search file names , or contents , ownership and modification times as well ?
Do you need the index to be completely up-to-date , or not ?
How long can you stand to wait for results ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since this is a task that benefits from some optimization, there are so many different combinations of file servers/clients out there, and so many use cases to choose from, there are lots of different solutions but not many good ones that will do exactly what you want out of the box.So, in order to narrow it down, you need to decide exactly what you're looking for.
What server are you using?
What clients do you need to support?
Are you wanting to just search file names, or contents, ownership and modification times as well?
Do you need the index to be completely up-to-date, or not?
How long can you stand to wait for results?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802003</id>
	<title>Re:How about Spotlight? That works on shared volum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255956600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While the parent's response is rather snide, it nonetheless highlights an important truth.  Granted there was a many-year gap where Spotlight didn't have server integration like good old Classic Mac OS, but it does now as of Leopard.</p><p>To be honest I assumed Windows would have the same thing already, given how obvious it is.  Why don't they ever copy the good bits?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While the parent 's response is rather snide , it nonetheless highlights an important truth .
Granted there was a many-year gap where Spotlight did n't have server integration like good old Classic Mac OS , but it does now as of Leopard.To be honest I assumed Windows would have the same thing already , given how obvious it is .
Why do n't they ever copy the good bits ?
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While the parent's response is rather snide, it nonetheless highlights an important truth.
Granted there was a many-year gap where Spotlight didn't have server integration like good old Classic Mac OS, but it does now as of Leopard.To be honest I assumed Windows would have the same thing already, given how obvious it is.
Why don't they ever copy the good bits?
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801775</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806149</id>
	<title>Re:A couple of options</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1256044560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, that sort of thing can get you downvoted. I certainly ain't brave enough to risk Slashdot karma.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , that sort of thing can get you downvoted .
I certainly ai n't brave enough to risk Slashdot karma .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, that sort of thing can get you downvoted.
I certainly ain't brave enough to risk Slashdot karma.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801887</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803589</id>
	<title>Re:A couple of options</title>
	<author>Unhandled</author>
	<datestamp>1255967940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know I'm rowing against the current, but when something actually does the job, why not mention it, I think the point is to actually help someone resolve a problem here, but I could be wrong. Maybe I should add some MS bashing comments to blend in.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-p</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know I 'm rowing against the current , but when something actually does the job , why not mention it , I think the point is to actually help someone resolve a problem here , but I could be wrong .
Maybe I should add some MS bashing comments to blend in .
: -p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know I'm rowing against the current, but when something actually does the job, why not mention it, I think the point is to actually help someone resolve a problem here, but I could be wrong.
Maybe I should add some MS bashing comments to blend in.
:-p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801887</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29828531</id>
	<title>everything</title>
	<author>Mr.Mustard</author>
	<datestamp>1256118600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry I'm late, but you might want to look into Everything.<br><a href="http://www.voidtools.com/" title="voidtools.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.voidtools.com/</a> [voidtools.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry I 'm late , but you might want to look into Everything.http : //www.voidtools.com/ [ voidtools.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry I'm late, but you might want to look into Everything.http://www.voidtools.com/ [voidtools.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802457</id>
	<title>Look at e-discovery products</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255959240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the products in this category will probably meet your needs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the products in this category will probably meet your needs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the products in this category will probably meet your needs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802119</id>
	<title>Desktop search is not the way to go</title>
	<author>vmxeo</author>
	<datestamp>1255957200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously. You're probably going to want a separate server(s) for this job. You didn't specifiy what you're indexing, how often, or where, however I'll make some assumptions and point you towards an enterprise search appliance or product. Many will probably point you to Google Enterprise Search. I've worked with the search functionality withing Microsoft Sharepoint 2007, and it's (ostensibly) free spin-off, Microsoft Search Server. Again, you'll probably need to dedicate some hardware to this. In addition to crawling all the content, the search product will also need to index and present it to the user. This requires a front-end crawling role, back-end indexing role, and a database to keep all the data in. Dealing with several hundred gigs mean you'll want to have separate servers for all 3 (again, basing this off of my knowledge of MS products. YMMV). The nice part is that your users will work through a webpage, and the workstation won't be tied up doing any crunching of it's own. </p><p>
Try starting here:
<a href="http://www.google.com/enterprise/" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/enterprise/</a> [google.com]
</p><p>
or here:
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/enterprisesearch/en/us/search-server-express.aspx" title="microsoft.com">http://www.microsoft.com/enterprisesearch/en/us/search-server-express.aspx</a> [microsoft.com]
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
You 're probably going to want a separate server ( s ) for this job .
You did n't specifiy what you 're indexing , how often , or where , however I 'll make some assumptions and point you towards an enterprise search appliance or product .
Many will probably point you to Google Enterprise Search .
I 've worked with the search functionality withing Microsoft Sharepoint 2007 , and it 's ( ostensibly ) free spin-off , Microsoft Search Server .
Again , you 'll probably need to dedicate some hardware to this .
In addition to crawling all the content , the search product will also need to index and present it to the user .
This requires a front-end crawling role , back-end indexing role , and a database to keep all the data in .
Dealing with several hundred gigs mean you 'll want to have separate servers for all 3 ( again , basing this off of my knowledge of MS products .
YMMV ) . The nice part is that your users will work through a webpage , and the workstation wo n't be tied up doing any crunching of it 's own .
Try starting here : http : //www.google.com/enterprise/ [ google.com ] or here : http : //www.microsoft.com/enterprisesearch/en/us/search-server-express.aspx [ microsoft.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
You're probably going to want a separate server(s) for this job.
You didn't specifiy what you're indexing, how often, or where, however I'll make some assumptions and point you towards an enterprise search appliance or product.
Many will probably point you to Google Enterprise Search.
I've worked with the search functionality withing Microsoft Sharepoint 2007, and it's (ostensibly) free spin-off, Microsoft Search Server.
Again, you'll probably need to dedicate some hardware to this.
In addition to crawling all the content, the search product will also need to index and present it to the user.
This requires a front-end crawling role, back-end indexing role, and a database to keep all the data in.
Dealing with several hundred gigs mean you'll want to have separate servers for all 3 (again, basing this off of my knowledge of MS products.
YMMV). The nice part is that your users will work through a webpage, and the workstation won't be tied up doing any crunching of it's own.
Try starting here:
http://www.google.com/enterprise/ [google.com]

or here:
http://www.microsoft.com/enterprisesearch/en/us/search-server-express.aspx [microsoft.com]
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29811001</id>
	<title>Re:You don't</title>
	<author>griffinme</author>
	<datestamp>1256063460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This became a huge problem here after we started to upgrade to dual cpu machines. On the old machines it would only index when the computer wasn't doing anything which really wasn't that often. With a dual cpu setup one cpu is usually doing nothing so desktop search was indexing \_all\_ the time on just a few machines in one office. The office kept complaining about their network connection running at a crawl. The few machines indexing the share were conflicting with each other. "Hey somebody looked at this file, we better re-index it." They created a vicious circle of indexing the same files over and over.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This became a huge problem here after we started to upgrade to dual cpu machines .
On the old machines it would only index when the computer was n't doing anything which really was n't that often .
With a dual cpu setup one cpu is usually doing nothing so desktop search was indexing \ _all \ _ the time on just a few machines in one office .
The office kept complaining about their network connection running at a crawl .
The few machines indexing the share were conflicting with each other .
" Hey somebody looked at this file , we better re-index it .
" They created a vicious circle of indexing the same files over and over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This became a huge problem here after we started to upgrade to dual cpu machines.
On the old machines it would only index when the computer wasn't doing anything which really wasn't that often.
With a dual cpu setup one cpu is usually doing nothing so desktop search was indexing \_all\_ the time on just a few machines in one office.
The office kept complaining about their network connection running at a crawl.
The few machines indexing the share were conflicting with each other.
"Hey somebody looked at this file, we better re-index it.
" They created a vicious circle of indexing the same files over and over.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801475</id>
	<title>DTSearch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255953420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DTSearch (http://www.dtsearch.com/). Although not free, you can install it on a server, schedule index updates, and have the client use the indexes (provided they are placed on a shared folder of the server).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DTSearch ( http : //www.dtsearch.com/ ) .
Although not free , you can install it on a server , schedule index updates , and have the client use the indexes ( provided they are placed on a shared folder of the server ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DTSearch (http://www.dtsearch.com/).
Although not free, you can install it on a server, schedule index updates, and have the client use the indexes (provided they are placed on a shared folder of the server).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806325</id>
	<title>Access Rights?</title>
	<author>An anonymous Frank</author>
	<datestamp>1256045880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had a look at some solutions last year, and ran into one hell of a road block; most solutions I had a look at presume that all the information you're indexing should be searchable and/or available to anyone that can reach your search tool's client.</p><p>Has anyone had experience with something that will search the indexes for items based on your credentials?  (Meaning that if you're not in accounting you can't get results for that data set)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a look at some solutions last year , and ran into one hell of a road block ; most solutions I had a look at presume that all the information you 're indexing should be searchable and/or available to anyone that can reach your search tool 's client.Has anyone had experience with something that will search the indexes for items based on your credentials ?
( Meaning that if you 're not in accounting you ca n't get results for that data set )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a look at some solutions last year, and ran into one hell of a road block; most solutions I had a look at presume that all the information you're indexing should be searchable and/or available to anyone that can reach your search tool's client.Has anyone had experience with something that will search the indexes for items based on your credentials?
(Meaning that if you're not in accounting you can't get results for that data set)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806331</id>
	<title>Looking at the wrong problem?</title>
	<author>thogard</author>
	<datestamp>1256045880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ever consider hiring a librarian?  I've worked at 3 small companies that had one and they were far more profitable than most of their competition because there was someone in charge of organizing the data.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ever consider hiring a librarian ?
I 've worked at 3 small companies that had one and they were far more profitable than most of their competition because there was someone in charge of organizing the data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ever consider hiring a librarian?
I've worked at 3 small companies that had one and they were far more profitable than most of their competition because there was someone in charge of organizing the data.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29836529</id>
	<title>Re:Cross-Platform</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256232420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah I'm gonna have the same setup and I'd seriously be interested in making that feature available</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah I 'm gon na have the same setup and I 'd seriously be interested in making that feature available</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah I'm gonna have the same setup and I'd seriously be interested in making that feature available</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803111</id>
	<title>3 steps</title>
	<author>Sun.Jedi</author>
	<datestamp>1255964040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>1. uninstall windows<br>
2. install linux<br>
3. run locate</htmltext>
<tokenext>1. uninstall windows 2. install linux 3. run locate</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1. uninstall windows
2. install linux
3. run locate</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803211</id>
	<title>Re:The XP search assistant dog</title>
	<author>ubrgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1255964820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I see you are trying to write a funny post. Would you like me to help with that?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I see you are trying to write a funny post .
Would you like me to help with that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see you are trying to write a funny post.
Would you like me to help with that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801797</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29814629</id>
	<title>You can't do it...yet</title>
	<author>KnownIssues</author>
	<datestamp>1256033400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is impossible to do with any product now, but you'll be able to do this with Windows Server N+1 as long as all your clients are also Windows N+1, but only if you also buy Microsoft Windows Office SharePoint Enteprise Search Server X. You could try to do it with current technology, but you'd have to remove one of your arbitrarily self-imposed restrictions. I could tell you which one, but I'd be reducing my chance that anything I'm saying is relevant if I guessed wrong.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is impossible to do with any product now , but you 'll be able to do this with Windows Server N + 1 as long as all your clients are also Windows N + 1 , but only if you also buy Microsoft Windows Office SharePoint Enteprise Search Server X. You could try to do it with current technology , but you 'd have to remove one of your arbitrarily self-imposed restrictions .
I could tell you which one , but I 'd be reducing my chance that anything I 'm saying is relevant if I guessed wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is impossible to do with any product now, but you'll be able to do this with Windows Server N+1 as long as all your clients are also Windows N+1, but only if you also buy Microsoft Windows Office SharePoint Enteprise Search Server X. You could try to do it with current technology, but you'd have to remove one of your arbitrarily self-imposed restrictions.
I could tell you which one, but I'd be reducing my chance that anything I'm saying is relevant if I guessed wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802895</id>
	<title>Re:wow!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255962420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>sharepoint does this.  (Let's find out how biased slashdot readers are)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sharepoint does this .
( Let 's find out how biased slashdot readers are )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sharepoint does this.
(Let's find out how biased slashdot readers are)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801689</id>
	<title>Lucene is a great foundation for this</title>
	<author>sribe</author>
	<datestamp>1255954740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I think I'd start by looking <a href="http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/PoweredBy" title="apache.org">here</a> [apache.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I think I 'd start by looking here [ apache.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I think I'd start by looking here [apache.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801605</id>
	<title>Locate32</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255954200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It really depends on what you are looking for.  Are you wanting to index file names or do you want names and contents?  For me, I typically know what I'm looking for based on file name, so Locate32 works out great.  It's the Windows equivalent to 'slocate'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It really depends on what you are looking for .
Are you wanting to index file names or do you want names and contents ?
For me , I typically know what I 'm looking for based on file name , so Locate32 works out great .
It 's the Windows equivalent to 'slocate' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It really depends on what you are looking for.
Are you wanting to index file names or do you want names and contents?
For me, I typically know what I'm looking for based on file name, so Locate32 works out great.
It's the Windows equivalent to 'slocate'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801595</id>
	<title>Re:Mirror it.</title>
	<author>quanticle</author>
	<datestamp>1255954080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems that the parent wants to merge a remote index with his desktop search so that he <i>doesn't</i> have to do this.  Also, wouldn't giving each desktop its own copy of the data defeat the purpose of having a shared server?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems that the parent wants to merge a remote index with his desktop search so that he does n't have to do this .
Also , would n't giving each desktop its own copy of the data defeat the purpose of having a shared server ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems that the parent wants to merge a remote index with his desktop search so that he doesn't have to do this.
Also, wouldn't giving each desktop its own copy of the data defeat the purpose of having a shared server?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801479</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29821231</id>
	<title>X-Friend is the answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256125860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>have a look at the X-Friend product line of the german company x-dot. (http://www.x-friend.de).<br>They offer an enterprise search solution which seems to do everything you want.<br>They support a ton of file formats.<br>They even obey to any ACL set on the files, so a user only sees results of files which are readable by him.<br>You can also aggregate the search results over several distinct servers, so the end user only interfaces with his local client over a browser interface and then transparently can search over several servers at once.</p><p>Disclaimer: I have not tested the enterprise search product, but I am a happy user of their desktop search product.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>have a look at the X-Friend product line of the german company x-dot .
( http : //www.x-friend.de ) .They offer an enterprise search solution which seems to do everything you want.They support a ton of file formats.They even obey to any ACL set on the files , so a user only sees results of files which are readable by him.You can also aggregate the search results over several distinct servers , so the end user only interfaces with his local client over a browser interface and then transparently can search over several servers at once.Disclaimer : I have not tested the enterprise search product , but I am a happy user of their desktop search product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>have a look at the X-Friend product line of the german company x-dot.
(http://www.x-friend.de).They offer an enterprise search solution which seems to do everything you want.They support a ton of file formats.They even obey to any ACL set on the files, so a user only sees results of files which are readable by him.You can also aggregate the search results over several distinct servers, so the end user only interfaces with his local client over a browser interface and then transparently can search over several servers at once.Disclaimer: I have not tested the enterprise search product, but I am a happy user of their desktop search product.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29808535</id>
	<title>http://beagle-project.org Linux Search Tool</title>
	<author>j0ebaker</author>
	<datestamp>1256055420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>Hash: SHA1</p><p>The Beagle tool on Linux can be used.  It also has a web based<br>interface for running queries over the network.  From looking at the<br>configuration screens, it appears to be able to cascade to other<br>systems to send queries to beagle services there also.</p><p>Dogs have a great sense of smell for finding things, so put a Beagle<br>to work databasing your files for instant access in the future.</p><p>I've used beagle for a long time, and I even added the Beagle plugin<br>for firefox so I can find content on web pages I've visited.</p><p>Thanks to an open source tool such as Beagle, I don't have to trust<br>proprietary code that has the potential of giving away my secrets<br>through hidden back doors.</p><p>- -Joe<br>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)</p><p>iEYEARECAAYFAkrd1GMACgkQ7J1dPd3sAmCRiACgieFtKL8IsB1ub4V7zBTEVQ8/<br>WQEAoJHh8jO6FFr1LPFfCiqVMSeD78a6<br>=3DGr<br>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash : SHA1The Beagle tool on Linux can be used .
It also has a web basedinterface for running queries over the network .
From looking at theconfiguration screens , it appears to be able to cascade to othersystems to send queries to beagle services there also.Dogs have a great sense of smell for finding things , so put a Beagleto work databasing your files for instant access in the future.I 've used beagle for a long time , and I even added the Beagle pluginfor firefox so I can find content on web pages I 've visited.Thanks to an open source tool such as Beagle , I do n't have to trustproprietary code that has the potential of giving away my secretsthrough hidden back doors.- -Joe-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----Version : GnuPG v1.4.9 ( GNU/Linux ) iEYEARECAAYFAkrd1GMACgkQ7J1dPd3sAmCRiACgieFtKL8IsB1ub4V7zBTEVQ8/WQEAoJHh8jO6FFr1LPFfCiqVMSeD78a6 = 3DGr-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The Beagle tool on Linux can be used.
It also has a web basedinterface for running queries over the network.
From looking at theconfiguration screens, it appears to be able to cascade to othersystems to send queries to beagle services there also.Dogs have a great sense of smell for finding things, so put a Beagleto work databasing your files for instant access in the future.I've used beagle for a long time, and I even added the Beagle pluginfor firefox so I can find content on web pages I've visited.Thanks to an open source tool such as Beagle, I don't have to trustproprietary code that has the potential of giving away my secretsthrough hidden back doors.- -Joe-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)iEYEARECAAYFAkrd1GMACgkQ7J1dPd3sAmCRiACgieFtKL8IsB1ub4V7zBTEVQ8/WQEAoJHh8jO6FFr1LPFfCiqVMSeD78a6=3DGr-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804187</id>
	<title>Microsoft / Windows Search options</title>
	<author>bhpaddock</author>
	<datestamp>1255974240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft has a few solutions you can consider depending on your specific needs.</p><p>With Windows XP/2003, Vista/2008, or Windows 7 - you can install Windows Search 4 (not necessary on Win7, but recommended for Vista) on the server side to index the content, and then if you have WS4 (or Win7) on the client, it will automatically query the remote index when you perform searches against that file share.</p><p>Alternatively, if you run the free Microsoft Search Server (the Express version is free) which is based on SharePoint, you can index files on the server and then set up a Federated Search connector in Windows 7.  Windows 7 supports federating to OpenSearch + RSS/Atom enabled sources, and SharePoint / Search Server support this.  On current versions there's a bit of manual work to create the right OpenSearch description file, but it's pretty easy.  The upcoming 2010 SharePoint version provides those out of the box (as well as some additional enhancements supported by Windows 7).</p><p>I'm actually the developer who built the OpenSearch feature in Windows 7, so if you have questions about the search options in Windows 7, you can visit my blog (brandonlive.com) and/or e-mail me (via my site).</p><p>Hope that helps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft has a few solutions you can consider depending on your specific needs.With Windows XP/2003 , Vista/2008 , or Windows 7 - you can install Windows Search 4 ( not necessary on Win7 , but recommended for Vista ) on the server side to index the content , and then if you have WS4 ( or Win7 ) on the client , it will automatically query the remote index when you perform searches against that file share.Alternatively , if you run the free Microsoft Search Server ( the Express version is free ) which is based on SharePoint , you can index files on the server and then set up a Federated Search connector in Windows 7 .
Windows 7 supports federating to OpenSearch + RSS/Atom enabled sources , and SharePoint / Search Server support this .
On current versions there 's a bit of manual work to create the right OpenSearch description file , but it 's pretty easy .
The upcoming 2010 SharePoint version provides those out of the box ( as well as some additional enhancements supported by Windows 7 ) .I 'm actually the developer who built the OpenSearch feature in Windows 7 , so if you have questions about the search options in Windows 7 , you can visit my blog ( brandonlive.com ) and/or e-mail me ( via my site ) .Hope that helps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft has a few solutions you can consider depending on your specific needs.With Windows XP/2003, Vista/2008, or Windows 7 - you can install Windows Search 4 (not necessary on Win7, but recommended for Vista) on the server side to index the content, and then if you have WS4 (or Win7) on the client, it will automatically query the remote index when you perform searches against that file share.Alternatively, if you run the free Microsoft Search Server (the Express version is free) which is based on SharePoint, you can index files on the server and then set up a Federated Search connector in Windows 7.
Windows 7 supports federating to OpenSearch + RSS/Atom enabled sources, and SharePoint / Search Server support this.
On current versions there's a bit of manual work to create the right OpenSearch description file, but it's pretty easy.
The upcoming 2010 SharePoint version provides those out of the box (as well as some additional enhancements supported by Windows 7).I'm actually the developer who built the OpenSearch feature in Windows 7, so if you have questions about the search options in Windows 7, you can visit my blog (brandonlive.com) and/or e-mail me (via my site).Hope that helps.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802071</id>
	<title>Re:Google Enterprise Search</title>
	<author>xoundmind</author>
	<datestamp>1255956960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's exactly whats he wants. In a shared Windows environment, it beats the native Outlook search speed handily and covers my organization's shared drive.

Actually, the search speed has saved my a few times in being able to reconstruct a problem and react accordingly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's exactly whats he wants .
In a shared Windows environment , it beats the native Outlook search speed handily and covers my organization 's shared drive .
Actually , the search speed has saved my a few times in being able to reconstruct a problem and react accordingly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's exactly whats he wants.
In a shared Windows environment, it beats the native Outlook search speed handily and covers my organization's shared drive.
Actually, the search speed has saved my a few times in being able to reconstruct a problem and react accordingly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803427</id>
	<title>Re:the god-awful truth</title>
	<author>rrohbeck</author>
	<datestamp>1255966500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><tt>ssh user@fileserver 'cd<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/shared/myproject;wcfind . -name \_\* -prune -o -type f -! -name \*.o -a -! -name \*.a -a -! -name \*.so\* -a -! -name \*.d -print | while read a; do ( file "$a" | fgrep -q 'text' ) &amp;&gt;/dev/null &amp;&amp; fgrep -H "" "$a"; done | gzip -c9' &gt;~/index/myproject.gz</tt></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ssh user @ fileserver 'cd /shared/myproject ; wcfind .
-name \ _ \ * -prune -o -type f - !
-name \ * .o -a - !
-name \ * .a -a - !
-name \ * .so \ * -a - !
-name \ * .d -print | while read a ; do ( file " $ a " | fgrep -q 'text ' ) &amp; &gt; /dev/null &amp;&amp; fgrep -H " " " $ a " ; done | gzip -c9 ' &gt; ~ /index/myproject.gz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ssh user@fileserver 'cd /shared/myproject;wcfind .
-name \_\* -prune -o -type f -!
-name \*.o -a -!
-name \*.a -a -!
-name \*.so\* -a -!
-name \*.d -print | while read a; do ( file "$a" | fgrep -q 'text' ) &amp;&gt;/dev/null &amp;&amp; fgrep -H "" "$a"; done | gzip -c9' &gt;~/index/myproject.gz</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801525</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804619</id>
	<title>x1</title>
	<author>blokje00</author>
	<datestamp>1255980900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>try www.x1.com I think it will solve all your issues</htmltext>
<tokenext>try www.x1.com I think it will solve all your issues</tokentext>
<sentencetext>try www.x1.com I think it will solve all your issues</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803769</id>
	<title>Re:How about Spotlight? That works on shared volum</title>
	<author>kuzb</author>
	<datestamp>1255969500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except then you have another terrible search solution which isn't meant for the amount of data you'd find on a large server.  Worse, you have an operating system that is terrible as a server solution.</p><p>On the other hand, you could just use a unix/linux distro of your choice, and beagle (http://beagle-project.org) - which is meant for indexing large amounts of data and has many clients some of which can remotely access it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except then you have another terrible search solution which is n't meant for the amount of data you 'd find on a large server .
Worse , you have an operating system that is terrible as a server solution.On the other hand , you could just use a unix/linux distro of your choice , and beagle ( http : //beagle-project.org ) - which is meant for indexing large amounts of data and has many clients some of which can remotely access it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except then you have another terrible search solution which isn't meant for the amount of data you'd find on a large server.
Worse, you have an operating system that is terrible as a server solution.On the other hand, you could just use a unix/linux distro of your choice, and beagle (http://beagle-project.org) - which is meant for indexing large amounts of data and has many clients some of which can remotely access it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801527</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802173</id>
	<title>Re:How about Spotlight? That works on shared volum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255957500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>spotlight doesn't work on my ntfs volumes.<br>or am i doing something wrong?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>spotlight does n't work on my ntfs volumes.or am i doing something wrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>spotlight doesn't work on my ntfs volumes.or am i doing something wrong?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801775</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804753</id>
	<title>We use mnogosearch to index about 700GB</title>
	<author>oernii</author>
	<datestamp>1256069220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We use mnogosearch to index about 700GB:
search results are on our intranet, but mnogosearch can return an XML I belive, to integrating into some king of web-service should be easy.

PS: access restrictions are a little problem though. We now have to implement our own search on mnogosearch which checks permissions first.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We use mnogosearch to index about 700GB : search results are on our intranet , but mnogosearch can return an XML I belive , to integrating into some king of web-service should be easy .
PS : access restrictions are a little problem though .
We now have to implement our own search on mnogosearch which checks permissions first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We use mnogosearch to index about 700GB:
search results are on our intranet, but mnogosearch can return an XML I belive, to integrating into some king of web-service should be easy.
PS: access restrictions are a little problem though.
We now have to implement our own search on mnogosearch which checks permissions first.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804217</id>
	<title>X1</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255974720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>X1 is by far the most robust and accurate client I've used. It's not free but it's a great piece of software. There's even a server application that will allow you to search throughout your entire organization.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>X1 is by far the most robust and accurate client I 've used .
It 's not free but it 's a great piece of software .
There 's even a server application that will allow you to search throughout your entire organization .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>X1 is by far the most robust and accurate client I've used.
It's not free but it's a great piece of software.
There's even a server application that will allow you to search throughout your entire organization.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29815971</id>
	<title>Re:Mirror it.</title>
	<author>jedwidz</author>
	<datestamp>1256039220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In all seriousness, this is basically what I'm doing - but only for a moderate amount of data (&lt; 5GB) that's specifically under my control.</p><p>Pros:<br>- searching is fast and centralized (i.e. one search covers the lot)<br>- content is accessible at local disk speeds<br>- network or file server outages aren't a big deal<br>- 'local' files are included in file server backups</p><p>The software I'm using is:</p><p>sync: SyncBackSE<br>search: Copernic Desktop Search Professional</p><p>My resyncs are scheduled nightly.  I'd prefer to have local changes syncing live to the network shares (and not vice-versa), but haven't found sync software that does this efficiently on Windows.</p><p>The only major downside is the mess when I have to use the network shares directly, before my local changes are synced across.  To work around this I'll sometimes edit the remote copy directly, or kick off a resync.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In all seriousness , this is basically what I 'm doing - but only for a moderate amount of data ( Pros : - searching is fast and centralized ( i.e .
one search covers the lot ) - content is accessible at local disk speeds- network or file server outages are n't a big deal- 'local ' files are included in file server backupsThe software I 'm using is : sync : SyncBackSEsearch : Copernic Desktop Search ProfessionalMy resyncs are scheduled nightly .
I 'd prefer to have local changes syncing live to the network shares ( and not vice-versa ) , but have n't found sync software that does this efficiently on Windows.The only major downside is the mess when I have to use the network shares directly , before my local changes are synced across .
To work around this I 'll sometimes edit the remote copy directly , or kick off a resync .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In all seriousness, this is basically what I'm doing - but only for a moderate amount of data (Pros:- searching is fast and centralized (i.e.
one search covers the lot)- content is accessible at local disk speeds- network or file server outages aren't a big deal- 'local' files are included in file server backupsThe software I'm using is:sync: SyncBackSEsearch: Copernic Desktop Search ProfessionalMy resyncs are scheduled nightly.
I'd prefer to have local changes syncing live to the network shares (and not vice-versa), but haven't found sync software that does this efficiently on Windows.The only major downside is the mess when I have to use the network shares directly, before my local changes are synced across.
To work around this I'll sometimes edit the remote copy directly, or kick off a resync.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801479</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802197</id>
	<title>OS X Spotlight Server</title>
	<author>dirkdodgers</author>
	<datestamp>1255957740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/features/spotlight-server.html" title="apple.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/features/spotlight-server.html</a> [apple.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.apple.com/server/macosx/features/spotlight-server.html [ apple.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/features/spotlight-server.html [apple.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801439</id>
	<title>Enterprise Content Management with Alfresco</title>
	<author>RicRoc</author>
	<datestamp>1255953240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, Google's Search Appliance (GSA) could be used, I have seen it used with limited success. The main problem was how to respect access control on documents: either you index them or you don't, and if you index them with GSA, sensitive data may show up in search results. Also, we had a lot of trouble "taming" GSA: it would regularly take down servers that were dimensioned for light loads.</p><p>I would suggest using Alfresco <a href="http://www.alfresco.com/" title="alfresco.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.alfresco.com/</a> [alfresco.com] as a CIFS (Common Internet File System) or WebDav store for all those documents. This would give you the simplicity of a shared folder and the opportunity to enrich the documents with searchable metadata such as tags, etc. Each folder (or any item, in fact) could have the correct access control that would be respected by the search engine, Lucene. <a href="http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/" title="apache.org" rel="nofollow">http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/</a> [apache.org]</p><p>Alfresco comes in both Enterprise and Community Edition, it's very easy to try out -- even our non-techie project manager could install it on his PC within 10 minutes. Try that with Documentum, FileNet or IBM DB2 Content Manager!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , Google 's Search Appliance ( GSA ) could be used , I have seen it used with limited success .
The main problem was how to respect access control on documents : either you index them or you do n't , and if you index them with GSA , sensitive data may show up in search results .
Also , we had a lot of trouble " taming " GSA : it would regularly take down servers that were dimensioned for light loads.I would suggest using Alfresco http : //www.alfresco.com/ [ alfresco.com ] as a CIFS ( Common Internet File System ) or WebDav store for all those documents .
This would give you the simplicity of a shared folder and the opportunity to enrich the documents with searchable metadata such as tags , etc .
Each folder ( or any item , in fact ) could have the correct access control that would be respected by the search engine , Lucene .
http : //lucene.apache.org/java/docs/ [ apache.org ] Alfresco comes in both Enterprise and Community Edition , it 's very easy to try out -- even our non-techie project manager could install it on his PC within 10 minutes .
Try that with Documentum , FileNet or IBM DB2 Content Manager !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, Google's Search Appliance (GSA) could be used, I have seen it used with limited success.
The main problem was how to respect access control on documents: either you index them or you don't, and if you index them with GSA, sensitive data may show up in search results.
Also, we had a lot of trouble "taming" GSA: it would regularly take down servers that were dimensioned for light loads.I would suggest using Alfresco http://www.alfresco.com/ [alfresco.com] as a CIFS (Common Internet File System) or WebDav store for all those documents.
This would give you the simplicity of a shared folder and the opportunity to enrich the documents with searchable metadata such as tags, etc.
Each folder (or any item, in fact) could have the correct access control that would be respected by the search engine, Lucene.
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/ [apache.org]Alfresco comes in both Enterprise and Community Edition, it's very easy to try out -- even our non-techie project manager could install it on his PC within 10 minutes.
Try that with Documentum, FileNet or IBM DB2 Content Manager!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29809603</id>
	<title>IBM OmniFind</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256058660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you're able to get a hold of it, IBM OmniFind Yahoo Edition would do the trick. Unfortunately Yahoo pulled the plug when they went into bed with Microsoft (Bing). I'm using it on a local intranet, and it works great. If you have a deep wallet, you can always look into the commercial version IBM offers, but it is really nothing but a packaged version of <a href="http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs" title="apache.org" rel="nofollow">Apache Lucene</a> [apache.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're able to get a hold of it , IBM OmniFind Yahoo Edition would do the trick .
Unfortunately Yahoo pulled the plug when they went into bed with Microsoft ( Bing ) .
I 'm using it on a local intranet , and it works great .
If you have a deep wallet , you can always look into the commercial version IBM offers , but it is really nothing but a packaged version of Apache Lucene [ apache.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're able to get a hold of it, IBM OmniFind Yahoo Edition would do the trick.
Unfortunately Yahoo pulled the plug when they went into bed with Microsoft (Bing).
I'm using it on a local intranet, and it works great.
If you have a deep wallet, you can always look into the commercial version IBM offers, but it is really nothing but a packaged version of Apache Lucene [apache.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803361</id>
	<title>Microsoft Search Server 2008 Express</title>
	<author>Icyfire0573</author>
	<datestamp>1255965960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously? Microsoft offers a free piece of software that runs on the server that does "exactly" what he needs and we are suggesting Sharepoint/Alfresco, grep/locate and Google Search Server?<br><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/enterprisesearch/en/us/search-server-express.aspx" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/enterprisesearch/en/us/search-server-express.aspx</a> [microsoft.com]</p><p>You don't have to like them, but you should consider that they want to steal the market everywhere enough to give away decent software to get their foot in the door.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously ?
Microsoft offers a free piece of software that runs on the server that does " exactly " what he needs and we are suggesting Sharepoint/Alfresco , grep/locate and Google Search Server ? http : //www.microsoft.com/enterprisesearch/en/us/search-server-express.aspx [ microsoft.com ] You do n't have to like them , but you should consider that they want to steal the market everywhere enough to give away decent software to get their foot in the door .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously?
Microsoft offers a free piece of software that runs on the server that does "exactly" what he needs and we are suggesting Sharepoint/Alfresco, grep/locate and Google Search Server?http://www.microsoft.com/enterprisesearch/en/us/search-server-express.aspx [microsoft.com]You don't have to like them, but you should consider that they want to steal the market everywhere enough to give away decent software to get their foot in the door.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801891</id>
	<title>Windows 7?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255955820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am probably missing something obvious here or misunderstanding the question, however, I am very happy with the search integrated in Windows 7. I have about a terabyte of data across two different volumes, and when I use the regular Windows 7 search I get instant, detailed results.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am probably missing something obvious here or misunderstanding the question , however , I am very happy with the search integrated in Windows 7 .
I have about a terabyte of data across two different volumes , and when I use the regular Windows 7 search I get instant , detailed results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am probably missing something obvious here or misunderstanding the question, however, I am very happy with the search integrated in Windows 7.
I have about a terabyte of data across two different volumes, and when I use the regular Windows 7 search I get instant, detailed results.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802907</id>
	<title>grep and locate</title>
	<author>gzipped\_tar</author>
	<datestamp>1255962540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you can't grep or locate, go fsck yourself<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you ca n't grep or locate , go fsck yourself ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you can't grep or locate, go fsck yourself ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29805337</id>
	<title>Dedicated search</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256034300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Desktop search is by design not fit for indexing large quantity's of data over the network. You should consider switching to a dedicated search appliance or software solution.<br>examples are:<br>Google Mini: http://www.google.com/enterprise/search/mini.html<br>Thunderstone: http://www.thunderstone.com/texis/site/pages<br>SophiaOne: http://www.sohpiaone.com<br>Microsoft search server: http://www.microsoft.com/enterprisesearch/en/us/search-server-express.aspx</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Desktop search is by design not fit for indexing large quantity 's of data over the network .
You should consider switching to a dedicated search appliance or software solution.examples are : Google Mini : http : //www.google.com/enterprise/search/mini.htmlThunderstone : http : //www.thunderstone.com/texis/site/pagesSophiaOne : http : //www.sohpiaone.comMicrosoft search server : http : //www.microsoft.com/enterprisesearch/en/us/search-server-express.aspx</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Desktop search is by design not fit for indexing large quantity's of data over the network.
You should consider switching to a dedicated search appliance or software solution.examples are:Google Mini: http://www.google.com/enterprise/search/mini.htmlThunderstone: http://www.thunderstone.com/texis/site/pagesSophiaOne: http://www.sohpiaone.comMicrosoft search server: http://www.microsoft.com/enterprisesearch/en/us/search-server-express.aspx</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29805461</id>
	<title>Re:A couple of options</title>
	<author>Tomsk70</author>
	<datestamp>1256035740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, he *is* asking for a real-world solution, not a technically superior (but used by nobody) app that somehow allows the sysop a huge sense of superiority whilst removing them even furthur from the aforementioned real world.</p><p>Am I alone in seeing a pattern here?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , he * is * asking for a real-world solution , not a technically superior ( but used by nobody ) app that somehow allows the sysop a huge sense of superiority whilst removing them even furthur from the aforementioned real world.Am I alone in seeing a pattern here ?
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, he *is* asking for a real-world solution, not a technically superior (but used by nobody) app that somehow allows the sysop a huge sense of superiority whilst removing them even furthur from the aforementioned real world.Am I alone in seeing a pattern here?
:-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801887</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800733</id>
	<title>wow!</title>
	<author>tivoKlr</author>
	<datestamp>1255949580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's been an hour since this story was posted.
<p>
You've stumped Slashdot. Bravo!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's been an hour since this story was posted .
You 've stumped Slashdot .
Bravo !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's been an hour since this story was posted.
You've stumped Slashdot.
Bravo!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803399</id>
	<title>Re:the god-awful truth</title>
	<author>peter</author>
	<datestamp>1255966260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FYI, GNU find has xargs built in these days:</p><p>find -name '*.php*' -exec grep func {} +</p><p>the + instead of ';' makes it collect up multiple arguments to grep<br>like xargs instead of the traditional find -exec behaviour which is like xargs -n1.  I use -exec {} + all the time, because it's less typing, and safe with<br>filenames with punctuation or whitespace, so you don't have to type -print0 | xargs -0 either.  (BTW, if you have a list of filenames that you processes with something line oriented, you can use xargs -d'\n')</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FYI , GNU find has xargs built in these days : find -name ' * .php * ' -exec grep func { } + the + instead of ' ; ' makes it collect up multiple arguments to greplike xargs instead of the traditional find -exec behaviour which is like xargs -n1 .
I use -exec { } + all the time , because it 's less typing , and safe withfilenames with punctuation or whitespace , so you do n't have to type -print0 | xargs -0 either .
( BTW , if you have a list of filenames that you processes with something line oriented , you can use xargs -d ' \ n ' )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FYI, GNU find has xargs built in these days:find -name '*.php*' -exec grep func {} +the + instead of ';' makes it collect up multiple arguments to greplike xargs instead of the traditional find -exec behaviour which is like xargs -n1.
I use -exec {} + all the time, because it's less typing, and safe withfilenames with punctuation or whitespace, so you don't have to type -print0 | xargs -0 either.
(BTW, if you have a list of filenames that you processes with something line oriented, you can use xargs -d'\n')</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801525</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802383</id>
	<title>Re:the god-awful truth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255958940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And then you man xargs, and maybe man grep, and realize that find is indeed being used to search the filenames for *.php*, and letting grep search the contents for damnfunctionname.</p><p>Anyway, any decent locate implementation should work fine for the file names, modulo a few details about mount-points. For searching in files? Good question, but I very rarely need to search inside more than a hundred files, so locate/grep works well enough for me, with find on the rare occasions I need fs metadata...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And then you man xargs , and maybe man grep , and realize that find is indeed being used to search the filenames for * .php * , and letting grep search the contents for damnfunctionname.Anyway , any decent locate implementation should work fine for the file names , modulo a few details about mount-points .
For searching in files ?
Good question , but I very rarely need to search inside more than a hundred files , so locate/grep works well enough for me , with find on the rare occasions I need fs metadata.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And then you man xargs, and maybe man grep, and realize that find is indeed being used to search the filenames for *.php*, and letting grep search the contents for damnfunctionname.Anyway, any decent locate implementation should work fine for the file names, modulo a few details about mount-points.
For searching in files?
Good question, but I very rarely need to search inside more than a hundred files, so locate/grep works well enough for me, with find on the rare occasions I need fs metadata...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801741</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29805721</id>
	<title>Novell quickfinder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256039580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.novell.com/products/openenterpriseserver/quickfinder.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.novell.com/products/openenterpriseserver/quickfinder.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.novell.com/products/openenterpriseserver/quickfinder.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801953</id>
	<title>PC Docs Docs Open</title>
	<author>Orion Blastar</author>
	<datestamp>1255956180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.pcdocs.com/" title="pcdocs.com">Docs Open is a commercial document management system</a> [pcdocs.com] but right now their web page doesn't seem to be working. We used it at a law firm I worked at. IIRC it was able to search through the billions of documents that the 300+ lawyers used in their cases.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Docs Open is a commercial document management system [ pcdocs.com ] but right now their web page does n't seem to be working .
We used it at a law firm I worked at .
IIRC it was able to search through the billions of documents that the 300 + lawyers used in their cases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Docs Open is a commercial document management system [pcdocs.com] but right now their web page doesn't seem to be working.
We used it at a law firm I worked at.
IIRC it was able to search through the billions of documents that the 300+ lawyers used in their cases.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800757</id>
	<title>Google Enterprise Search</title>
	<author>HeavyD14</author>
	<datestamp>1255949640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not that I've ever used it before, but it sounds like it does what you want:

<a href="http://www.google.com/enterprise/search/gsa.html" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/enterprise/search/gsa.html</a> [google.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not that I 've ever used it before , but it sounds like it does what you want : http : //www.google.com/enterprise/search/gsa.html [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not that I've ever used it before, but it sounds like it does what you want:

http://www.google.com/enterprise/search/gsa.html [google.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29807003</id>
	<title>Re:Federated Search</title>
	<author>PalmKiller</author>
	<datestamp>1256049360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It works in vista also, and windows server 2008, not that anyone would care about vista<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:).</htmltext>
<tokenext>It works in vista also , and windows server 2008 , not that anyone would care about vista : ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It works in vista also, and windows server 2008, not that anyone would care about vista :).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801375</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29819565</id>
	<title>Wait, what kind of files?</title>
	<author>Kagetsuki</author>
	<datestamp>1256061300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think you are being a bit too vague on what kind of files you are searching for/indexing. We have 5TB of storage that's 70\% full, that includes quite a few smaller files/code files, and I've never had an issue with "find  -name ".  Of course I rarely use that because our files are organized and we have naming standards. Do you have a shared volume full of random files all mashed together? Are you in a college dorm and someone grabbed an external drive and shared it out for everyone to just throw porn and music and movies into and you want to index it so you can find Beastie Boys songs and XXX Blond Anal videos just that much faster?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you are being a bit too vague on what kind of files you are searching for/indexing .
We have 5TB of storage that 's 70 \ % full , that includes quite a few smaller files/code files , and I 've never had an issue with " find -name " .
Of course I rarely use that because our files are organized and we have naming standards .
Do you have a shared volume full of random files all mashed together ?
Are you in a college dorm and someone grabbed an external drive and shared it out for everyone to just throw porn and music and movies into and you want to index it so you can find Beastie Boys songs and XXX Blond Anal videos just that much faster ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you are being a bit too vague on what kind of files you are searching for/indexing.
We have 5TB of storage that's 70\% full, that includes quite a few smaller files/code files, and I've never had an issue with "find  -name ".
Of course I rarely use that because our files are organized and we have naming standards.
Do you have a shared volume full of random files all mashed together?
Are you in a college dorm and someone grabbed an external drive and shared it out for everyone to just throw porn and music and movies into and you want to index it so you can find Beastie Boys songs and XXX Blond Anal videos just that much faster?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801855</id>
	<title>RDP + CTRL-F</title>
	<author>isochroma</author>
	<datestamp>1255955640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>RDP into the machine, then CTRL-F on the volume, which is now local.

Don't bother with indexing service anyway, it just wastes time. Life's faster without it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>RDP into the machine , then CTRL-F on the volume , which is now local .
Do n't bother with indexing service anyway , it just wastes time .
Life 's faster without it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RDP into the machine, then CTRL-F on the volume, which is now local.
Don't bother with indexing service anyway, it just wastes time.
Life's faster without it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801629</id>
	<title>Your answer in song</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255954380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>dtsearch - google it</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>dtsearch - google it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dtsearch - google it</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803155</id>
	<title>Sharepoint?</title>
	<author>toastar</author>
	<datestamp>1255964460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like a a job for Sharepoint!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like a a job for Sharepoint !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like a a job for Sharepoint!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801987</id>
	<title>Try Earth</title>
	<author>theritz</author>
	<datestamp>1255956420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Earth allows you to find files across a large network of machines and track disk usage in real time. It consists of a daemon that indexes file systems in real time and reports all the changes back to a central database. This can then be queried through a simple, yet powerful, web interface. Think of it like Spotlight or Beagle but operating system independent with a central database for multiple machines with a web application that allows novel ways of exploring your data."

<a href="http://open.rsp.com.au/projects/earth" title="rsp.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://open.rsp.com.au/projects/earth</a> [rsp.com.au]</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Earth allows you to find files across a large network of machines and track disk usage in real time .
It consists of a daemon that indexes file systems in real time and reports all the changes back to a central database .
This can then be queried through a simple , yet powerful , web interface .
Think of it like Spotlight or Beagle but operating system independent with a central database for multiple machines with a web application that allows novel ways of exploring your data .
" http : //open.rsp.com.au/projects/earth [ rsp.com.au ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Earth allows you to find files across a large network of machines and track disk usage in real time.
It consists of a daemon that indexes file systems in real time and reports all the changes back to a central database.
This can then be queried through a simple, yet powerful, web interface.
Think of it like Spotlight or Beagle but operating system independent with a central database for multiple machines with a web application that allows novel ways of exploring your data.
"

http://open.rsp.com.au/projects/earth [rsp.com.au]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29805617</id>
	<title>Dedicated search is the way to go.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256038320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dedicated search is the way to go.<br>Desktop search is not meant for share indexation. Network load of multiple users will kill you.<br>Possible solotions are:<br>Google Search appliance:http://www.google.com/enterprise/search/mini.html<br>Thunderstone: http://www.thunderstone.com/texis/site/pages<br>SophiaOne: http://www.sophiaone.com<br>MS Search server 2008: http://www.microsoft.com/enterprisesearch/en/us/search-server-express.aspx</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dedicated search is the way to go.Desktop search is not meant for share indexation .
Network load of multiple users will kill you.Possible solotions are : Google Search appliance : http : //www.google.com/enterprise/search/mini.htmlThunderstone : http : //www.thunderstone.com/texis/site/pagesSophiaOne : http : //www.sophiaone.comMS Search server 2008 : http : //www.microsoft.com/enterprisesearch/en/us/search-server-express.aspx</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dedicated search is the way to go.Desktop search is not meant for share indexation.
Network load of multiple users will kill you.Possible solotions are:Google Search appliance:http://www.google.com/enterprise/search/mini.htmlThunderstone: http://www.thunderstone.com/texis/site/pagesSophiaOne: http://www.sophiaone.comMS Search server 2008: http://www.microsoft.com/enterprisesearch/en/us/search-server-express.aspx</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29813119</id>
	<title>use KnowwledgeTree document management system</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256071320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Use something like the community version of KnowledgeTree. Searches are done on the server, not on individual desktops. I run it in combination with the open source Amahi server project and really like it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Use something like the community version of KnowledgeTree .
Searches are done on the server , not on individual desktops .
I run it in combination with the open source Amahi server project and really like it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use something like the community version of KnowledgeTree.
Searches are done on the server, not on individual desktops.
I run it in combination with the open source Amahi server project and really like it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806417</id>
	<title>Re:Enterprise Content Management with Alfresco</title>
	<author>spyrochaete</author>
	<datestamp>1256046480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The GSA works perfectly well with many security standards (AD, NTLM, Kerberos, SAML, forms, cookies) and it obscures secure search results from users who do not have read permissions to those documents.  It's probably easier to configure the GSA's security settings than with any other enterprise search platform.</p><p>Furthermore, the GSA has a self-throttling feature called Host Load Scheduling which allows you to limit the number of connections opened per second.  If that's not sufficient you can throttle the VLAN on your switch to limit the throughput in KB/s.  Or you can stop crawling during the day and schedule it at night.</p><p>Based on your comments it sounds to me like you haven't used the GSA in a long time.  There's a lot of handy new features.  Google has really been listening to its customers and configuration partners, and especially the larger ones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The GSA works perfectly well with many security standards ( AD , NTLM , Kerberos , SAML , forms , cookies ) and it obscures secure search results from users who do not have read permissions to those documents .
It 's probably easier to configure the GSA 's security settings than with any other enterprise search platform.Furthermore , the GSA has a self-throttling feature called Host Load Scheduling which allows you to limit the number of connections opened per second .
If that 's not sufficient you can throttle the VLAN on your switch to limit the throughput in KB/s .
Or you can stop crawling during the day and schedule it at night.Based on your comments it sounds to me like you have n't used the GSA in a long time .
There 's a lot of handy new features .
Google has really been listening to its customers and configuration partners , and especially the larger ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The GSA works perfectly well with many security standards (AD, NTLM, Kerberos, SAML, forms, cookies) and it obscures secure search results from users who do not have read permissions to those documents.
It's probably easier to configure the GSA's security settings than with any other enterprise search platform.Furthermore, the GSA has a self-throttling feature called Host Load Scheduling which allows you to limit the number of connections opened per second.
If that's not sufficient you can throttle the VLAN on your switch to limit the throughput in KB/s.
Or you can stop crawling during the day and schedule it at night.Based on your comments it sounds to me like you haven't used the GSA in a long time.
There's a lot of handy new features.
Google has really been listening to its customers and configuration partners, and especially the larger ones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801375</id>
	<title>Federated Search</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255952940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MS does have a solution, it's called Windows Federated Search.  Windows 7 with 2008R2 has it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. there might be a way to do with Windows Desktop Search 4.0.  Here's some info on it - http://geekswithblogs.net/sdorman/archive/2009/05/14/windows-7-federated-search.aspx</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MS does have a solution , it 's called Windows Federated Search .
Windows 7 with 2008R2 has it .. there might be a way to do with Windows Desktop Search 4.0 .
Here 's some info on it - http : //geekswithblogs.net/sdorman/archive/2009/05/14/windows-7-federated-search.aspx</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MS does have a solution, it's called Windows Federated Search.
Windows 7 with 2008R2 has it .. there might be a way to do with Windows Desktop Search 4.0.
Here's some info on it - http://geekswithblogs.net/sdorman/archive/2009/05/14/windows-7-federated-search.aspx</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803347</id>
	<title>Seriously, ask slashdot?</title>
	<author>GeckoAddict</author>
	<datestamp>1255965840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are a number of decent options, which one to pick depends on specific requirements not included in the original question.  Did the OP even search?
<br> <br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_enterprise\_search\_vendors" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_enterprise\_search\_vendors</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are a number of decent options , which one to pick depends on specific requirements not included in the original question .
Did the OP even search ?
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List \ _of \ _enterprise \ _search \ _vendors [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are a number of decent options, which one to pick depends on specific requirements not included in the original question.
Did the OP even search?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_enterprise\_search\_vendors [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801371</id>
	<title>Everything (Search Engine)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255952940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess it could work, although you can't index the files directly. You have to run a local copy and one on the server as an EPT Server.

www.voidtools.com, although it seems to be down at the moment, so here's a link to the FAQ on Google's Cache: <a href="http://74.125.113.132/search?q=cache:fcYHcEJKH3UJ:www.voidtools.com/faq.php" title="74.125.113.132" rel="nofollow">http://74.125.113.132/search?q=cache:fcYHcEJKH3UJ:www.voidtools.com/faq.php</a> [74.125.113.132]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess it could work , although you ca n't index the files directly .
You have to run a local copy and one on the server as an EPT Server .
www.voidtools.com , although it seems to be down at the moment , so here 's a link to the FAQ on Google 's Cache : http : //74.125.113.132/search ? q = cache : fcYHcEJKH3UJ : www.voidtools.com/faq.php [ 74.125.113.132 ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess it could work, although you can't index the files directly.
You have to run a local copy and one on the server as an EPT Server.
www.voidtools.com, although it seems to be down at the moment, so here's a link to the FAQ on Google's Cache: http://74.125.113.132/search?q=cache:fcYHcEJKH3UJ:www.voidtools.com/faq.php [74.125.113.132]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801887</id>
	<title>Re:A couple of options</title>
	<author>cyber-dragon.net</author>
	<datestamp>1255955820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. and actually recommending an upgrade to Vista?<br>Brave man.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are on / .
and actually recommending an upgrade to Vista ? Brave man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are on /.
and actually recommending an upgrade to Vista?Brave man.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801353</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802015</id>
	<title>Re:SSH and locate.</title>
	<author>ls671</author>
	<datestamp>1255956660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmmm... locate doesn't allow you to search within files. What about using rgrep or grep -r  ?</p><p>find is great too (but slower on the first run before results get cached by the kernel, if you have enough spare memory) when you need to know which files have been modified in a given period of time, which files take more room on the disk, etc..</p><p>I usually disable locate for security reasons, at least use slocate !<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>So I'd say I use find and rgrep<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmmm... locate does n't allow you to search within files .
What about using rgrep or grep -r ? find is great too ( but slower on the first run before results get cached by the kernel , if you have enough spare memory ) when you need to know which files have been modified in a given period of time , which files take more room on the disk , etc..I usually disable locate for security reasons , at least use slocate !
; - ) So I 'd say I use find and rgrep ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmmm... locate doesn't allow you to search within files.
What about using rgrep or grep -r  ?find is great too (but slower on the first run before results get cached by the kernel, if you have enough spare memory) when you need to know which files have been modified in a given period of time, which files take more room on the disk, etc..I usually disable locate for security reasons, at least use slocate !
;-)So I'd say I use find and rgrep ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803921</id>
	<title>never mind</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255971060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i remembered how to use google...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i remembered how to use google.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i remembered how to use google...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801569</id>
	<title>Hmm</title>
	<author>ShooterNeo</author>
	<datestamp>1255953900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Basically, you need your desktop search application to look at the index file on the remote file server generated by an instance of the application running on the file server.  Technically, incredibly simple but I don't know which application currently available is divided into front and back ends like that.  Maybe open source...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Basically , you need your desktop search application to look at the index file on the remote file server generated by an instance of the application running on the file server .
Technically , incredibly simple but I do n't know which application currently available is divided into front and back ends like that .
Maybe open source.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Basically, you need your desktop search application to look at the index file on the remote file server generated by an instance of the application running on the file server.
Technically, incredibly simple but I don't know which application currently available is divided into front and back ends like that.
Maybe open source...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802861</id>
	<title>Try Xapian Omega</title>
	<author>Sarusa</author>
	<datestamp>1255962120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had this same problem not too long ago - we have a shared documentation tree with tens of thousands of documents that I wanted to index. I tried dozens of search engines in my spare time, most of which were just horrible (Beagle), were a nightmare to install for someone like me who's not a full or even part time admin (Apache SOLR), wouldn't allow cross platform access (lots of Windows ones, obviously), store a complete separate copy of every document (Alfresco, which didn't seem to have an option to ) and especially ones that had trouble indexing pdfs and MS Office docs (which we have a lot of). I'm not the IT guy, and have no budget for this, so Google Appliance was right out.</p><p>What I eventually ended up with is Omega on top of Xapian - http://xapian.org/  - it's not too hairy to install, indexes pretty fast, points back to the original files (so it doesn't duplicate everything), and can handle multiple repositories. It will also detect dups and not show them twice, though similar files are treated as completely different (which is probably what you want in the absence of something more sophisticated).</p><p>Two downsides: It can't do incremental update (unless that's changed recently) so you have to rebuild the entire index nightly. And the search is really sparse and ugly, which turned off some of my users, but you can rewrite the templates if you want to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had this same problem not too long ago - we have a shared documentation tree with tens of thousands of documents that I wanted to index .
I tried dozens of search engines in my spare time , most of which were just horrible ( Beagle ) , were a nightmare to install for someone like me who 's not a full or even part time admin ( Apache SOLR ) , would n't allow cross platform access ( lots of Windows ones , obviously ) , store a complete separate copy of every document ( Alfresco , which did n't seem to have an option to ) and especially ones that had trouble indexing pdfs and MS Office docs ( which we have a lot of ) .
I 'm not the IT guy , and have no budget for this , so Google Appliance was right out.What I eventually ended up with is Omega on top of Xapian - http : //xapian.org/ - it 's not too hairy to install , indexes pretty fast , points back to the original files ( so it does n't duplicate everything ) , and can handle multiple repositories .
It will also detect dups and not show them twice , though similar files are treated as completely different ( which is probably what you want in the absence of something more sophisticated ) .Two downsides : It ca n't do incremental update ( unless that 's changed recently ) so you have to rebuild the entire index nightly .
And the search is really sparse and ugly , which turned off some of my users , but you can rewrite the templates if you want to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had this same problem not too long ago - we have a shared documentation tree with tens of thousands of documents that I wanted to index.
I tried dozens of search engines in my spare time, most of which were just horrible (Beagle), were a nightmare to install for someone like me who's not a full or even part time admin (Apache SOLR), wouldn't allow cross platform access (lots of Windows ones, obviously), store a complete separate copy of every document (Alfresco, which didn't seem to have an option to ) and especially ones that had trouble indexing pdfs and MS Office docs (which we have a lot of).
I'm not the IT guy, and have no budget for this, so Google Appliance was right out.What I eventually ended up with is Omega on top of Xapian - http://xapian.org/  - it's not too hairy to install, indexes pretty fast, points back to the original files (so it doesn't duplicate everything), and can handle multiple repositories.
It will also detect dups and not show them twice, though similar files are treated as completely different (which is probably what you want in the absence of something more sophisticated).Two downsides: It can't do incremental update (unless that's changed recently) so you have to rebuild the entire index nightly.
And the search is really sparse and ugly, which turned off some of my users, but you can rewrite the templates if you want to.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800771</id>
	<title>solution to hundreds of terabytes of docs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255949700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>how about using a program like Documentum? We generate several thousand technical documents and drawing a month, and use it for all our document management needs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>how about using a program like Documentum ?
We generate several thousand technical documents and drawing a month , and use it for all our document management needs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how about using a program like Documentum?
We generate several thousand technical documents and drawing a month, and use it for all our document management needs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803275</id>
	<title>Depends on the server, doesn't it?</title>
	<author>GNU(slash)Nickname</author>
	<datestamp>1255965240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Novell's QuickFinder (http://www.novell.com/products/openenterpriseserver/quickfinder.html) works well in a Netware or OES2 environment. It even respects file permissions when displaying results.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Novell 's QuickFinder ( http : //www.novell.com/products/openenterpriseserver/quickfinder.html ) works well in a Netware or OES2 environment .
It even respects file permissions when displaying results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Novell's QuickFinder (http://www.novell.com/products/openenterpriseserver/quickfinder.html) works well in a Netware or OES2 environment.
It even respects file permissions when displaying results.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803945</id>
	<title>Surely you could just...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255971240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For Linux/Unix:<br>1. Mount the CIFS share/s on a linux/unix box.<br>2. run updatedb<br>3. use the locate/slocate command to search OR use places-&gt;search in gnome?</p><p>For Windows:<br>1. Install cygwin+updatedb+locate/slocate<br>2. do as above</p><p>Some Other Options:<br>Femfind: http://femfind.sourceforge.net/<br>pySMBsearch: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pysmbsearch/<br>LAN-Crawler: http://code.google.com/p/lan-crawler/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For Linux/Unix : 1 .
Mount the CIFS share/s on a linux/unix box.2 .
run updatedb3 .
use the locate/slocate command to search OR use places- &gt; search in gnome ? For Windows : 1 .
Install cygwin + updatedb + locate/slocate2 .
do as aboveSome Other Options : Femfind : http : //femfind.sourceforge.net/pySMBsearch : http : //sourceforge.net/projects/pysmbsearch/LAN-Crawler : http : //code.google.com/p/lan-crawler/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For Linux/Unix:1.
Mount the CIFS share/s on a linux/unix box.2.
run updatedb3.
use the locate/slocate command to search OR use places-&gt;search in gnome?For Windows:1.
Install cygwin+updatedb+locate/slocate2.
do as aboveSome Other Options:Femfind: http://femfind.sourceforge.net/pySMBsearch: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pysmbsearch/LAN-Crawler: http://code.google.com/p/lan-crawler/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806917</id>
	<title>Re:Mirror it.</title>
	<author>kriston</author>
	<datestamp>1256049000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I nominate this comment for Best of Slashdot.<br>I actually had to look at the moderation score to get the joke.</p><p>Kriston</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I nominate this comment for Best of Slashdot.I actually had to look at the moderation score to get the joke.Kriston</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I nominate this comment for Best of Slashdot.I actually had to look at the moderation score to get the joke.Kriston</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801479</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803049</id>
	<title>There's also an alternative to GSA and Sharepoint</title>
	<author>binaryspiral</author>
	<datestamp>1255963620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From IBM and Yahoo called OmniFind. It runs on a desktop or server and can index multiple shares... and the basic version is free but offers a lot of functionality.</p><p>Although if your business is booming, a GSA is freakin' sweet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From IBM and Yahoo called OmniFind .
It runs on a desktop or server and can index multiple shares... and the basic version is free but offers a lot of functionality.Although if your business is booming , a GSA is freakin ' sweet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From IBM and Yahoo called OmniFind.
It runs on a desktop or server and can index multiple shares... and the basic version is free but offers a lot of functionality.Although if your business is booming, a GSA is freakin' sweet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29808039</id>
	<title>Try Wilma?</title>
	<author>mcclk</author>
	<datestamp>1256053620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've used this program with some of my users on a large network volume that they needed to do keyword searches on.  The initial index build takes time (although not days), but subsequent updates are fast, and searching is super-fast.  You can tell it what file types to index, too, which is nice.  Everyone I've installed it for loves it, even though we have enterprise content management - they just find this easier to use and faster.

<a href="http://s3.amazonaws.com/redtree/wilma/en/help/index.html" title="amazonaws.com" rel="nofollow">http://s3.amazonaws.com/redtree/wilma/en/help/index.html</a> [amazonaws.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've used this program with some of my users on a large network volume that they needed to do keyword searches on .
The initial index build takes time ( although not days ) , but subsequent updates are fast , and searching is super-fast .
You can tell it what file types to index , too , which is nice .
Everyone I 've installed it for loves it , even though we have enterprise content management - they just find this easier to use and faster .
http : //s3.amazonaws.com/redtree/wilma/en/help/index.html [ amazonaws.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've used this program with some of my users on a large network volume that they needed to do keyword searches on.
The initial index build takes time (although not days), but subsequent updates are fast, and searching is super-fast.
You can tell it what file types to index, too, which is nice.
Everyone I've installed it for loves it, even though we have enterprise content management - they just find this easier to use and faster.
http://s3.amazonaws.com/redtree/wilma/en/help/index.html [amazonaws.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29805963</id>
	<title>Re:Enterprise Content Management with Alfresco</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256042460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tosh.</p><p>You can index documents in a variety of security contexts and have them faithfully filtered out when the results are rendered to screen. I've seen and deployed examples using NTLM and a custom security model layered on top of a SAML component.</p><p>If you've got the money for a full enterprise search solution, the GSA is a great way to go.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tosh.You can index documents in a variety of security contexts and have them faithfully filtered out when the results are rendered to screen .
I 've seen and deployed examples using NTLM and a custom security model layered on top of a SAML component.If you 've got the money for a full enterprise search solution , the GSA is a great way to go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tosh.You can index documents in a variety of security contexts and have them faithfully filtered out when the results are rendered to screen.
I've seen and deployed examples using NTLM and a custom security model layered on top of a SAML component.If you've got the money for a full enterprise search solution, the GSA is a great way to go.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801791</id>
	<title>BlackBall</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255955220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>www.blackball.com</p><p>They do federated indexing/searching without having to import data.  Scans the data where it resides...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>www.blackball.comThey do federated indexing/searching without having to import data .
Scans the data where it resides.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>www.blackball.comThey do federated indexing/searching without having to import data.
Scans the data where it resides...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29845089</id>
	<title>Artful Dodger men jean,Air Yeezy fusion man shoes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256307180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Http://www.tntshoes.com</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; We offer kinds of Newest Style Handbag,Brand Handbag,Fashion Handbags,<br>Ladies' Leather Handbag,Replica Handbag--AmmonOnline<br>We ship to worldwide by EMS,TNT,DHL,UPS.<br>We supply you with smooth and fast services, and do dorp shipping.<br>Welcome to visit our factory.<br>Please visit our Website:www.tntshoes.com  or products Album,</p><p>Contact us now, We can send you more details.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; OUR WEBSITE:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; HTTP://www.tntshoes.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Http : //www.tntshoes.com     We offer kinds of Newest Style Handbag,Brand Handbag,Fashion Handbags,Ladies ' Leather Handbag,Replica Handbag--AmmonOnlineWe ship to worldwide by EMS,TNT,DHL,UPS.We supply you with smooth and fast services , and do dorp shipping.Welcome to visit our factory.Please visit our Website : www.tntshoes.com or products Album,Contact us now , We can send you more details .
      OUR WEBSITE :                                                               YAHOO : shoppertrade @ yahoo.com.cn                                                                 MSN : shoppertrade @ hotmail.com                                                                           HTTP : //www.tntshoes.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Http://www.tntshoes.com
    We offer kinds of Newest Style Handbag,Brand Handbag,Fashion Handbags,Ladies' Leather Handbag,Replica Handbag--AmmonOnlineWe ship to worldwide by EMS,TNT,DHL,UPS.We supply you with smooth and fast services, and do dorp shipping.Welcome to visit our factory.Please visit our Website:www.tntshoes.com  or products Album,Contact us now, We can send you more details.
      OUR WEBSITE:
                                                              YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn
                                                                MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com
                                                                          HTTP://www.tntshoes.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29805621</id>
	<title>Pfff...</title>
	<author>ls671</author>
	<datestamp>1256038320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slackware is at version 13 which makes it much more advanced than a version 7.</p><p>Read at Slackware got to version 13 so quickly at this link:</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slackware" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slackware</a> [wikipedia.org]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)))</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slackware is at version 13 which makes it much more advanced than a version 7.Read at Slackware got to version 13 so quickly at this link : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slackware [ wikipedia.org ] ; - ) ) )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slackware is at version 13 which makes it much more advanced than a version 7.Read at Slackware got to version 13 so quickly at this link:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slackware [wikipedia.org] ;-)))</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804787</id>
	<title>Zoom Search is another option - But don't crawl</title>
	<author>PassMark</author>
	<datestamp>1256069460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are the developers of the Zoom search engine.<br><a href="http://www.wrensoft.com/zoom/" title="wrensoft.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.wrensoft.com/zoom/</a> [wrensoft.com]</p><p>We have spent some time recently looking at the problem if indexing large amounts of data, for see,<br><a href="http://www.wrensoft.com/zoom/support/faq\_large\_sites.html" title="wrensoft.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.wrensoft.com/zoom/support/faq\_large\_sites.html</a> [wrensoft.com]</p><p>Many people above have recommended using external appliances, or external hardware. This doesn't make sense in our opinion. Using an external indexer that crawls your files means that 1) You are loading up your network, 2) You are limited to network bandwidth speeds (rather than SATA or SCSI data transfer speeds) 3) You have the overhead of the HTTP protocol.</p><p>What makes sense is to run the indexer on the server that is hosting the files and index them directly off the disk. Don't spider them, and don't do it across a network. This can save you many days of indexing time.</p><p>But with this much data, I don't think there is any really quick solution. Whatever you decide to do is going to take some setup effort.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are the developers of the Zoom search engine.http : //www.wrensoft.com/zoom/ [ wrensoft.com ] We have spent some time recently looking at the problem if indexing large amounts of data , for see,http : //www.wrensoft.com/zoom/support/faq \ _large \ _sites.html [ wrensoft.com ] Many people above have recommended using external appliances , or external hardware .
This does n't make sense in our opinion .
Using an external indexer that crawls your files means that 1 ) You are loading up your network , 2 ) You are limited to network bandwidth speeds ( rather than SATA or SCSI data transfer speeds ) 3 ) You have the overhead of the HTTP protocol.What makes sense is to run the indexer on the server that is hosting the files and index them directly off the disk .
Do n't spider them , and do n't do it across a network .
This can save you many days of indexing time.But with this much data , I do n't think there is any really quick solution .
Whatever you decide to do is going to take some setup effort .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are the developers of the Zoom search engine.http://www.wrensoft.com/zoom/ [wrensoft.com]We have spent some time recently looking at the problem if indexing large amounts of data, for see,http://www.wrensoft.com/zoom/support/faq\_large\_sites.html [wrensoft.com]Many people above have recommended using external appliances, or external hardware.
This doesn't make sense in our opinion.
Using an external indexer that crawls your files means that 1) You are loading up your network, 2) You are limited to network bandwidth speeds (rather than SATA or SCSI data transfer speeds) 3) You have the overhead of the HTTP protocol.What makes sense is to run the indexer on the server that is hosting the files and index them directly off the disk.
Don't spider them, and don't do it across a network.
This can save you many days of indexing time.But with this much data, I don't think there is any really quick solution.
Whatever you decide to do is going to take some setup effort.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802069</id>
	<title>Re:How about Spotlight? That works on shared volum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255956960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've tried ducks, but they tend to nibble the occasional one or zero, and they leave an awful mess on the platters when they poop. Try Spotlight instead -- not as cute, but easier on the data, hardware, and the nose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've tried ducks , but they tend to nibble the occasional one or zero , and they leave an awful mess on the platters when they poop .
Try Spotlight instead -- not as cute , but easier on the data , hardware , and the nose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've tried ducks, but they tend to nibble the occasional one or zero, and they leave an awful mess on the platters when they poop.
Try Spotlight instead -- not as cute, but easier on the data, hardware, and the nose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801527</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804703</id>
	<title>Some ideas</title>
	<author>nielo</author>
	<datestamp>1255982340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>Under linux/unix:</b>
<br>1. mount CIFS share
<br>2. run updatedb
<br>3. run locate/slocate
<br>
<br> <b>Under Windows:</b>
<br>1. Do the above with cygwin
<br> <b>Other Options:</b>
<br> <a href="http://www.locate32.net/" title="locate32.net" rel="nofollow">Locate32</a> [locate32.net]
<br> <a href="http://femfind.sourceforge.net/" title="sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow">Femfind</a> [sourceforge.net]
<br> <a href="http://code.google.com/p/lanfinder/" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Lan Finder</a> [google.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Under linux/unix : 1. mount CIFS share 2. run updatedb 3. run locate/slocate Under Windows : 1 .
Do the above with cygwin Other Options : Locate32 [ locate32.net ] Femfind [ sourceforge.net ] Lan Finder [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Under linux/unix:
1. mount CIFS share
2. run updatedb
3. run locate/slocate

 Under Windows:
1.
Do the above with cygwin
 Other Options:
 Locate32 [locate32.net]
 Femfind [sourceforge.net]
 Lan Finder [google.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804879</id>
	<title>IBM OmniFind</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256070660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <a href="http://omnifind.ibm.yahoo.net/" title="yahoo.net" rel="nofollow">IBM OmniFind Yahoo Edition.</a> [yahoo.net] </p><p>No charge (unless you want support).  Install it on your shared fileserver, it will index the files on the server and provide a web interface for searching it.</p><p>It does need a reasonable server, though, if you have a lot of documents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IBM OmniFind Yahoo Edition .
[ yahoo.net ] No charge ( unless you want support ) .
Install it on your shared fileserver , it will index the files on the server and provide a web interface for searching it.It does need a reasonable server , though , if you have a lot of documents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> IBM OmniFind Yahoo Edition.
[yahoo.net] No charge (unless you want support).
Install it on your shared fileserver, it will index the files on the server and provide a web interface for searching it.It does need a reasonable server, though, if you have a lot of documents.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29837415</id>
	<title>Check searchtool Lookeen with shared index!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256236080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I recommend the Outlook add-in Lookeen for searching on shared volumes in combination with outlook. This tool has a shared index feature which will be very helpful!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I recommend the Outlook add-in Lookeen for searching on shared volumes in combination with outlook .
This tool has a shared index feature which will be very helpful ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I recommend the Outlook add-in Lookeen for searching on shared volumes in combination with outlook.
This tool has a shared index feature which will be very helpful!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803213</id>
	<title>Re:wow!</title>
	<author>Tubal-Cain</author>
	<datestamp>1255964820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And yet it looks like you posted an hour <em>before</em> the article.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And yet it looks like you posted an hour before the article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And yet it looks like you posted an hour before the article.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801607</id>
	<title>Two words...</title>
	<author>roc97007</author>
	<datestamp>1255954200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Google appliance...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google appliance.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Google appliance...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804141</id>
	<title>ffsearch</title>
	<author>Psykar</author>
	<datestamp>1255973640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Used this a while back to index all the samba shares at my res college, works great, and is accessible from a browser by other hosts on the LAN.</p><p>ffsearch.sourceforge.net</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Used this a while back to index all the samba shares at my res college , works great , and is accessible from a browser by other hosts on the LAN.ffsearch.sourceforge.net</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Used this a while back to index all the samba shares at my res college, works great, and is accessible from a browser by other hosts on the LAN.ffsearch.sourceforge.net</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804359</id>
	<title>Locate32 for Windows servers</title>
	<author>kaffesumpen</author>
	<datestamp>1255976460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have used locate32 on my Windows XP machine for indexing the local and shared drives.

My shared volumes server runs Linux, so I tried utilizing its locate-database.
Unfortunately I came to the conclusion that locate32 and the Unix/Linux variant of locate are not compatible at all.

However, if you are using a Windows server then you can run locate32 on the server and allow the clients machines to access it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have used locate32 on my Windows XP machine for indexing the local and shared drives .
My shared volumes server runs Linux , so I tried utilizing its locate-database .
Unfortunately I came to the conclusion that locate32 and the Unix/Linux variant of locate are not compatible at all .
However , if you are using a Windows server then you can run locate32 on the server and allow the clients machines to access it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have used locate32 on my Windows XP machine for indexing the local and shared drives.
My shared volumes server runs Linux, so I tried utilizing its locate-database.
Unfortunately I came to the conclusion that locate32 and the Unix/Linux variant of locate are not compatible at all.
However, if you are using a Windows server then you can run locate32 on the server and allow the clients machines to access it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802259</id>
	<title>Share searching.</title>
	<author>Timmmm</author>
	<datestamp>1255958040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wrote a web site/spider to do this for the whole network at uni. It was beautiful C++ all the way. After I left some silly CS people rewrote it in Python/PHP (ugh) here: <a href="http://code.google.com/p/trufflepig/" title="google.com">http://code.google.com/p/trufflepig/</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wrote a web site/spider to do this for the whole network at uni .
It was beautiful C + + all the way .
After I left some silly CS people rewrote it in Python/PHP ( ugh ) here : http : //code.google.com/p/trufflepig/ [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wrote a web site/spider to do this for the whole network at uni.
It was beautiful C++ all the way.
After I left some silly CS people rewrote it in Python/PHP (ugh) here: http://code.google.com/p/trufflepig/ [google.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803257</id>
	<title>ISYS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255965120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>we use ISYS at work.<br>and its danged handy.  does large scale shared drives very well.</p><p>http://www.isys-search.com/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>we use ISYS at work.and its danged handy .
does large scale shared drives very well.http : //www.isys-search.com/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we use ISYS at work.and its danged handy.
does large scale shared drives very well.http://www.isys-search.com/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801525</id>
	<title>the god-awful truth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255953660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>How do you integrate your desktop search application with your remote file server without forcing each desktop to index the hundred gigabyte volume on its own?'</p></div></blockquote><p>
Really?  I ssh to the fileserver, and then do something like</p><blockquote><div><p> <tt>find . -name "*.php*" -print | xargs grep damnfunctionname</tt></p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you integrate your desktop search application with your remote file server without forcing each desktop to index the hundred gigabyte volume on its own ?
' Really ?
I ssh to the fileserver , and then do something like find .
-name " * .php * " -print | xargs grep damnfunctionname</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you integrate your desktop search application with your remote file server without forcing each desktop to index the hundred gigabyte volume on its own?
'
Really?
I ssh to the fileserver, and then do something like find .
-name "*.php*" -print | xargs grep damnfunctionname 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802581</id>
	<title>Use Windows Indexing Service</title>
	<author>a.koepke</author>
	<datestamp>1255959960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am just embarking on a project to do exactly what the OP is asking for. Windows Server 2003 has an indexing service you can setup. <a href="http://www.windowsnetworking.com/articles\_tutorials/Working-With-Windows-Server-2003-Indexing-Service.html" title="windowsnetworking.com">http://www.windowsnetworking.com/articles\_tutorials/Working-With-Windows-Server-2003-Indexing-Service.html</a> [windowsnetworking.com] It is limited in its own form but provides the back-end tools you need.<br>
<br>
Combine that with the next article from that site and you have a solution: <a href="http://www.windowsnetworking.com/articles\_tutorials/Making-Windows-Server-2003-Indexing-Service-Useful.html" title="windowsnetworking.com">http://www.windowsnetworking.com/articles\_tutorials/Making-Windows-Server-2003-Indexing-Service-Useful.html</a> [windowsnetworking.com] <br>
<br>
This article shows you how to use the Indexing service from an ASP script. The solution I am working on will be done in PHP as it can also link to COM applications. This basically allows you to put a file search tool on your Intranet which is indexed and returns the results very quickly. Best of all, it uses existing software on Windows and doesn't cost any extra.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am just embarking on a project to do exactly what the OP is asking for .
Windows Server 2003 has an indexing service you can setup .
http : //www.windowsnetworking.com/articles \ _tutorials/Working-With-Windows-Server-2003-Indexing-Service.html [ windowsnetworking.com ] It is limited in its own form but provides the back-end tools you need .
Combine that with the next article from that site and you have a solution : http : //www.windowsnetworking.com/articles \ _tutorials/Making-Windows-Server-2003-Indexing-Service-Useful.html [ windowsnetworking.com ] This article shows you how to use the Indexing service from an ASP script .
The solution I am working on will be done in PHP as it can also link to COM applications .
This basically allows you to put a file search tool on your Intranet which is indexed and returns the results very quickly .
Best of all , it uses existing software on Windows and does n't cost any extra .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am just embarking on a project to do exactly what the OP is asking for.
Windows Server 2003 has an indexing service you can setup.
http://www.windowsnetworking.com/articles\_tutorials/Working-With-Windows-Server-2003-Indexing-Service.html [windowsnetworking.com] It is limited in its own form but provides the back-end tools you need.
Combine that with the next article from that site and you have a solution: http://www.windowsnetworking.com/articles\_tutorials/Making-Windows-Server-2003-Indexing-Service-Useful.html [windowsnetworking.com] 

This article shows you how to use the Indexing service from an ASP script.
The solution I am working on will be done in PHP as it can also link to COM applications.
This basically allows you to put a file search tool on your Intranet which is indexed and returns the results very quickly.
Best of all, it uses existing software on Windows and doesn't cost any extra.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29805959</id>
	<title>Try regain Desktop Search (server variant)</title>
	<author>thtesche</author>
	<datestamp>1256042460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You should try regain <a href="http://regain.sourceforge.net/?lang=en" title="sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow">http://regain.sourceforge.net/?lang=en</a> [sourceforge.net] . There exists a desktop and a server version. And if you are clever you mix them. You can create your indices with the server version (crawler) and copy the to your desktop computer. So you can search without the need of an application server to run the search frontend.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You should try regain http : //regain.sourceforge.net/ ? lang = en [ sourceforge.net ] .
There exists a desktop and a server version .
And if you are clever you mix them .
You can create your indices with the server version ( crawler ) and copy the to your desktop computer .
So you can search without the need of an application server to run the search frontend .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should try regain http://regain.sourceforge.net/?lang=en [sourceforge.net] .
There exists a desktop and a server version.
And if you are clever you mix them.
You can create your indices with the server version (crawler) and copy the to your desktop computer.
So you can search without the need of an application server to run the search frontend.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803497</id>
	<title>Re:Mirror it.</title>
	<author>adamchou</author>
	<datestamp>1255967160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>LOL, you've been modded funny because your idea seems so ridiculous yet after reading your comments, it becomes apparent you're being serious.</htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL , you 've been modded funny because your idea seems so ridiculous yet after reading your comments , it becomes apparent you 're being serious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL, you've been modded funny because your idea seems so ridiculous yet after reading your comments, it becomes apparent you're being serious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801479</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803027</id>
	<title>SPLUNK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255963380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can use Splunk if your files are heterogeneous.   It is fast and easy to set up.  It is pretty good for doing relatively advanced searches against tons of data.<br>http://www.splunk.com/</p><p>The Google GSA is quite good, too, and better for non-technical users.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can use Splunk if your files are heterogeneous .
It is fast and easy to set up .
It is pretty good for doing relatively advanced searches against tons of data.http : //www.splunk.com/The Google GSA is quite good , too , and better for non-technical users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can use Splunk if your files are heterogeneous.
It is fast and easy to set up.
It is pretty good for doing relatively advanced searches against tons of data.http://www.splunk.com/The Google GSA is quite good, too, and better for non-technical users.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801419</id>
	<title>SSH and locate.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255953180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I use SSH to access my file server. Because I use it as a music server as well, I use X forwarding. As I'm accessing the actual server instead of just mounting fileshares (which I do also), I do the file searches directly on the server. Usually good old locate. Haven't really found anything that beats it yet, but then again I like the CLI. If you're running windows... Sorry.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I use SSH to access my file server .
Because I use it as a music server as well , I use X forwarding .
As I 'm accessing the actual server instead of just mounting fileshares ( which I do also ) , I do the file searches directly on the server .
Usually good old locate .
Have n't really found anything that beats it yet , but then again I like the CLI .
If you 're running windows... Sorry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use SSH to access my file server.
Because I use it as a music server as well, I use X forwarding.
As I'm accessing the actual server instead of just mounting fileshares (which I do also), I do the file searches directly on the server.
Usually good old locate.
Haven't really found anything that beats it yet, but then again I like the CLI.
If you're running windows... Sorry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801797</id>
	<title>The XP search assistant dog</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255955220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The dog. Always helps me sniff ouut the files.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The dog .
Always helps me sniff ouut the files .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The dog.
Always helps me sniff ouut the files.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806471</id>
	<title>New times Coogi Jean,Bape Hoody,Gucci Sweatert---F</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256046840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Http://www.tntshoes.com</p><p>
&nbsp; we are a prefession online store, you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photos<br>if you are interested in our product, please email me by<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,hellow pls see our website in the photos attached attached is our store's website, we are a online shopping store, we are selling large brand new shoes,clothing, handbag,sunglasses,hats etc, our products are all  best quality with the cheapest price. You will see the more pictures and the price for our product in our website, we are selling all brand new handbag, please see below some price list of the product. We accept paypal as payment, and give free shipping. Jeans : A&amp;f Armani artful dodger jeans Bape BBC christian audigier COOGI D&amp;G diesel ED HARDY lrg etc $33-50 free shipping. Jersey NBA Jersey MLB NLBM nike puma adidas $12-30 free shiping.</p><p>
&nbsp; OUR WEBSITE:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; HTTP://www.tntshoes.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Http : //www.tntshoes.com   we are a prefession online store , you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photosif you are interested in our product , please email me by ,hellow pls see our website in the photos attached attached is our store 's website , we are a online shopping store , we are selling large brand new shoes,clothing , handbag,sunglasses,hats etc , our products are all best quality with the cheapest price .
You will see the more pictures and the price for our product in our website , we are selling all brand new handbag , please see below some price list of the product .
We accept paypal as payment , and give free shipping .
Jeans : A&amp;f Armani artful dodger jeans Bape BBC christian audigier COOGI D&amp;G diesel ED HARDY lrg etc $ 33-50 free shipping .
Jersey NBA Jersey MLB NLBM nike puma adidas $ 12-30 free shiping .
  OUR WEBSITE :                                                   YAHOO : shoppertrade @ yahoo.com.cn                                                         MSN : shoppertrade @ hotmail.com                                                               HTTP : //www.tntshoes.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Http://www.tntshoes.com
  we are a prefession online store, you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photosif you are interested in our product, please email me by ,hellow pls see our website in the photos attached attached is our store's website, we are a online shopping store, we are selling large brand new shoes,clothing, handbag,sunglasses,hats etc, our products are all  best quality with the cheapest price.
You will see the more pictures and the price for our product in our website, we are selling all brand new handbag, please see below some price list of the product.
We accept paypal as payment, and give free shipping.
Jeans : A&amp;f Armani artful dodger jeans Bape BBC christian audigier COOGI D&amp;G diesel ED HARDY lrg etc $33-50 free shipping.
Jersey NBA Jersey MLB NLBM nike puma adidas $12-30 free shiping.
  OUR WEBSITE:
                                                  YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn
                                                        MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com
                                                              HTTP://www.tntshoes.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800715</id>
	<title>Call the NSA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255949520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They already have it indexed for you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They already have it indexed for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They already have it indexed for you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804229</id>
	<title>How about...</title>
	<author>KermitJunior</author>
	<datestamp>1255974900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>#updatedb</htmltext>
<tokenext># updatedb</tokentext>
<sentencetext>#updatedb</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803889</id>
	<title>X1 might be the answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255970880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use X1 locally to index my hard drive, network drives, email attachments, etc.  I love the search-as-you type functionality, unobtrusive indexing, and previews.  They have an enterprise version available that might meet your needs. http://www.x1.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use X1 locally to index my hard drive , network drives , email attachments , etc .
I love the search-as-you type functionality , unobtrusive indexing , and previews .
They have an enterprise version available that might meet your needs .
http : //www.x1.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use X1 locally to index my hard drive, network drives, email attachments, etc.
I love the search-as-you type functionality, unobtrusive indexing, and previews.
They have an enterprise version available that might meet your needs.
http://www.x1.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801553</id>
	<title>Use Microsoft Indexing Service</title>
	<author>Icono</author>
	<datestamp>1255953840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One way is to set up Microsoft Indexing Service on the server with the shared drive.  The MSC console app provides a search capability and one can also use the Indexing Service SDK for client apps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One way is to set up Microsoft Indexing Service on the server with the shared drive .
The MSC console app provides a search capability and one can also use the Indexing Service SDK for client apps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One way is to set up Microsoft Indexing Service on the server with the shared drive.
The MSC console app provides a search capability and one can also use the Indexing Service SDK for client apps.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803271</id>
	<title>Use Windows Search 4.0</title>
	<author>timestride</author>
	<datestamp>1255965240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the share is indexed, Windows Search 4.0 will query the index on the remote server.  Here is a link to the admin documentation with more information:

<a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc772446(WS.10).aspx" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc772446(WS.10).aspx</a> [microsoft.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the share is indexed , Windows Search 4.0 will query the index on the remote server .
Here is a link to the admin documentation with more information : http : //technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc772446 ( WS.10 ) .aspx [ microsoft.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the share is indexed, Windows Search 4.0 will query the index on the remote server.
Here is a link to the admin documentation with more information:

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc772446(WS.10).aspx [microsoft.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29840041</id>
	<title>IBM/Yahoo</title>
	<author>Ksigpaul</author>
	<datestamp>1256205420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's a free version of the expensive OmniFind product by IBM available with a little bit of Yahoo branding (which can be removed).  You can't really integrate it easily with local search but I would assume that your users know whether they want local or shared documents.  If you need security/permissions around people being allowed to access certain documents you're going to need to buy something.  Otherwise try:  <a href="http://omnifind.ibm.yahoo.net/" title="yahoo.net" rel="nofollow">http://omnifind.ibm.yahoo.net/</a> [yahoo.net]</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a free version of the expensive OmniFind product by IBM available with a little bit of Yahoo branding ( which can be removed ) .
You ca n't really integrate it easily with local search but I would assume that your users know whether they want local or shared documents .
If you need security/permissions around people being allowed to access certain documents you 're going to need to buy something .
Otherwise try : http : //omnifind.ibm.yahoo.net/ [ yahoo.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a free version of the expensive OmniFind product by IBM available with a little bit of Yahoo branding (which can be removed).
You can't really integrate it easily with local search but I would assume that your users know whether they want local or shared documents.
If you need security/permissions around people being allowed to access certain documents you're going to need to buy something.
Otherwise try:  http://omnifind.ibm.yahoo.net/ [yahoo.net]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800735</id>
	<title>Google Jew Search</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255949580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jew have too many files. Jews Joogle Jew Search.</p><p>Find Jews gas chambers before it's Jew late.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jew have too many files .
Jews Joogle Jew Search.Find Jews gas chambers before it 's Jew late .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jew have too many files.
Jews Joogle Jew Search.Find Jews gas chambers before it's Jew late.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802567</id>
	<title>Re:SSH and locate.</title>
	<author>hey</author>
	<datestamp>1255959900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You could make a web interface to locate.<br>(Only searches files names.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You could make a web interface to locate .
( Only searches files names .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could make a web interface to locate.
(Only searches files names.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29814261</id>
	<title>This sounds like a job for cron!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256032200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A cron job that does a find with file and maybe grep should be a good start. Then you can get clever with command line tools for pulling meta data out of images, videos, audio files, documents, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A cron job that does a find with file and maybe grep should be a good start .
Then you can get clever with command line tools for pulling meta data out of images , videos , audio files , documents , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A cron job that does a find with file and maybe grep should be a good start.
Then you can get clever with command line tools for pulling meta data out of images, videos, audio files, documents, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29805407</id>
	<title>Autonomy etc</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256035080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Autonomy IDOL with mapped security.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Autonomy IDOL with mapped security .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Autonomy IDOL with mapped security.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29819365</id>
	<title>RSP's Earth</title>
	<author>skyphyr</author>
	<datestamp>1256059440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Depending on your needs you may find RSP's Earth to be a viable solution.

<a href="http://open.rsp.com.au/projects/earth/" title="rsp.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://open.rsp.com.au/projects/earth/</a> [rsp.com.au]

It's cross-platform and has a web interface (though you could build a desktop one easily enough if you wanted to).

Cheers,

Alan.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Depending on your needs you may find RSP 's Earth to be a viable solution .
http : //open.rsp.com.au/projects/earth/ [ rsp.com.au ] It 's cross-platform and has a web interface ( though you could build a desktop one easily enough if you wanted to ) .
Cheers , Alan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depending on your needs you may find RSP's Earth to be a viable solution.
http://open.rsp.com.au/projects/earth/ [rsp.com.au]

It's cross-platform and has a web interface (though you could build a desktop one easily enough if you wanted to).
Cheers,

Alan.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29810677</id>
	<title>SearchIn : Distributed Data Management Solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256062260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go to BlackBall,Inc.s Website and download a free trial of SearchIn 7.0:<br>http://www.blackball.com/b/nav</p><p>Best Indexing tool I have ever used, for all types of data anywhere on a network, and the new version is cross platform.<br>And Im not just saying that because I helped develop it.  Haha, but seriously, it does everything you are talking about, and it outperforms other indexing and searching tools on the market.</p><p>It's so good, Toshiba even branded it under their name for distribution with their MFPs, for indexing documents that are scanned in from paper.</p><p>Check it out there too, its the same program, jus different branding;</p><p>http://copiers.toshiba.com/usa/software/document-management/e-bridge-research.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go to BlackBall,Inc.s Website and download a free trial of SearchIn 7.0 : http : //www.blackball.com/b/navBest Indexing tool I have ever used , for all types of data anywhere on a network , and the new version is cross platform.And Im not just saying that because I helped develop it .
Haha , but seriously , it does everything you are talking about , and it outperforms other indexing and searching tools on the market.It 's so good , Toshiba even branded it under their name for distribution with their MFPs , for indexing documents that are scanned in from paper.Check it out there too , its the same program , jus different branding ; http : //copiers.toshiba.com/usa/software/document-management/e-bridge-research.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go to BlackBall,Inc.s Website and download a free trial of SearchIn 7.0:http://www.blackball.com/b/navBest Indexing tool I have ever used, for all types of data anywhere on a network, and the new version is cross platform.And Im not just saying that because I helped develop it.
Haha, but seriously, it does everything you are talking about, and it outperforms other indexing and searching tools on the market.It's so good, Toshiba even branded it under their name for distribution with their MFPs, for indexing documents that are scanned in from paper.Check it out there too, its the same program, jus different branding;http://copiers.toshiba.com/usa/software/document-management/e-bridge-research.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806151</id>
	<title>Re:You don't</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256044560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Simple Approach:<br>Use a good naming convention and do not index. I do not know what you are indexing on or what is in the files. However, you could pick an appropriate naming convention and folder structure and then let the human brain find the right thing.</p><p>Slightly More Complex Approach:<br>You do not have a share anymore. Instead you have a web page with a database backend. Now fast forward that line of thought. Several commercial products do just this and even offer additional features such as desktop integration. One example is <a href="http://www.opentext.com/2/sol-products/sol-pro-llecm10.htm" title="opentext.com" rel="nofollow">Livelink</a> [opentext.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Simple Approach : Use a good naming convention and do not index .
I do not know what you are indexing on or what is in the files .
However , you could pick an appropriate naming convention and folder structure and then let the human brain find the right thing.Slightly More Complex Approach : You do not have a share anymore .
Instead you have a web page with a database backend .
Now fast forward that line of thought .
Several commercial products do just this and even offer additional features such as desktop integration .
One example is Livelink [ opentext.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Simple Approach:Use a good naming convention and do not index.
I do not know what you are indexing on or what is in the files.
However, you could pick an appropriate naming convention and folder structure and then let the human brain find the right thing.Slightly More Complex Approach:You do not have a share anymore.
Instead you have a web page with a database backend.
Now fast forward that line of thought.
Several commercial products do just this and even offer additional features such as desktop integration.
One example is Livelink [opentext.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29869311</id>
	<title>libFerris federation of "other" indexes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256496000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clucene and Postgres are combined, sure you could manage clucene and clucene, via libferris?</p><p>http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9298</p><p>Surely some clever sort can whip up a quick GUI for you...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clucene and Postgres are combined , sure you could manage clucene and clucene , via libferris ? http : //www.linuxjournal.com/article/9298Surely some clever sort can whip up a quick GUI for you.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clucene and Postgres are combined, sure you could manage clucene and clucene, via libferris?http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9298Surely some clever sort can whip up a quick GUI for you...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801979</id>
	<title>Your problem is obvious</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1255956420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i> If I try to use a <b>Windows</b> desktop search engine</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I try to use a Windows desktop search engine</tokentext>
<sentencetext> If I try to use a Windows desktop search engine</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801663</id>
	<title>Autonomy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255954560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Autonomy search.  Check them out.   One of the best in the world.   Obviously an enterprise solution and not inexpensive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Autonomy search .
Check them out .
One of the best in the world .
Obviously an enterprise solution and not inexpensive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Autonomy search.
Check them out.
One of the best in the world.
Obviously an enterprise solution and not inexpensive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806105</id>
	<title>Re:A couple of options</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256044020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not unfounded.</p><p>Microsoft *really* does suck that bad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not unfounded.Microsoft * really * does suck that bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not unfounded.Microsoft *really* does suck that bad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801887</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802157</id>
	<title>www.X1.com</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255957440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Haven't used it in a couple of years since they went away from their free model, but X1 (www.x1.com) rocked as a desktop search engine. They have federated search and plugins for a variety of server apps (sharepoint, etc).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have n't used it in a couple of years since they went away from their free model , but X1 ( www.x1.com ) rocked as a desktop search engine .
They have federated search and plugins for a variety of server apps ( sharepoint , etc ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Haven't used it in a couple of years since they went away from their free model, but X1 (www.x1.com) rocked as a desktop search engine.
They have federated search and plugins for a variety of server apps (sharepoint, etc).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801741</id>
	<title>Re:the god-awful truth</title>
	<author>beelsebob</author>
	<datestamp>1255954920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And then you sit and wait for ages for find to finish, and then you realise that it only searches in the file names, and not the contents of the file.  Of course, what I do, is ssh in, and then use mdfind, but yeh, find doesn't cut it on multi-terrabyte volumes, and especially not when you want to search on more than just the name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And then you sit and wait for ages for find to finish , and then you realise that it only searches in the file names , and not the contents of the file .
Of course , what I do , is ssh in , and then use mdfind , but yeh , find does n't cut it on multi-terrabyte volumes , and especially not when you want to search on more than just the name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And then you sit and wait for ages for find to finish, and then you realise that it only searches in the file names, and not the contents of the file.
Of course, what I do, is ssh in, and then use mdfind, but yeh, find doesn't cut it on multi-terrabyte volumes, and especially not when you want to search on more than just the name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801525</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801965</id>
	<title>You don't</title>
	<author>saleenS281</author>
	<datestamp>1255956240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You don't allow every client to index.  There's been several suggestions already, but most enterprises intentionally DISABLE desktop search.  It absolutely slaughters the share.  It's not a big deal when one user is doing it... but when 5,000 are, the I/O load becomes unsustainable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't allow every client to index .
There 's been several suggestions already , but most enterprises intentionally DISABLE desktop search .
It absolutely slaughters the share .
It 's not a big deal when one user is doing it... but when 5,000 are , the I/O load becomes unsustainable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't allow every client to index.
There's been several suggestions already, but most enterprises intentionally DISABLE desktop search.
It absolutely slaughters the share.
It's not a big deal when one user is doing it... but when 5,000 are, the I/O load becomes unsustainable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804861</id>
	<title>Re:A couple of options</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256070360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, here you read more than anywhere else about microsoft.. Almost as if this was a Microsoft site<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:rolleyes:</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , here you read more than anywhere else about microsoft.. Almost as if this was a Microsoft site : rolleyes :</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, here you read more than anywhere else about microsoft.. Almost as if this was a Microsoft site :rolleyes:</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801887</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806199</id>
	<title>Copernic Desktop Search</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256045040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i'm a avid user of Copernic Desktop Search. It indexes my shared network drives. Once the index is created,CDS only updates the index when the computer is idle which does NOT slow down your computer. There is a free trial on their web site. www.copernic.com</p><p>Check it out!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i 'm a avid user of Copernic Desktop Search .
It indexes my shared network drives .
Once the index is created,CDS only updates the index when the computer is idle which does NOT slow down your computer .
There is a free trial on their web site .
www.copernic.comCheck it out !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i'm a avid user of Copernic Desktop Search.
It indexes my shared network drives.
Once the index is created,CDS only updates the index when the computer is idle which does NOT slow down your computer.
There is a free trial on their web site.
www.copernic.comCheck it out!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801765</id>
	<title>Cross-Platform</title>
	<author>pinkocommie</author>
	<datestamp>1255955100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wondering if there's anything cross-platform. I'm in the process of setting up an OpenSolaris fileserver (primarily to use ZFS/Raid-Z) and have both linux and windows boxes. It would be great to be able to have an index on each that could be read by a client app or a unified index perhaps.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wondering if there 's anything cross-platform .
I 'm in the process of setting up an OpenSolaris fileserver ( primarily to use ZFS/Raid-Z ) and have both linux and windows boxes .
It would be great to be able to have an index on each that could be read by a client app or a unified index perhaps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wondering if there's anything cross-platform.
I'm in the process of setting up an OpenSolaris fileserver (primarily to use ZFS/Raid-Z) and have both linux and windows boxes.
It would be great to be able to have an index on each that could be read by a client app or a unified index perhaps.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801603</id>
	<title>Use MSS 2008 Express, SharePoint, FAST</title>
	<author>VTBlue</author>
	<datestamp>1255954140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Use Microsoft Search Server 2008 Express...its free, all you need is a free server box. Also Check out SharePoint Search and FAST enterprise search.<br><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/enterprisesearch" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/enterprisesearch</a> [microsoft.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Use Microsoft Search Server 2008 Express...its free , all you need is a free server box .
Also Check out SharePoint Search and FAST enterprise search.http : //www.microsoft.com/enterprisesearch [ microsoft.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use Microsoft Search Server 2008 Express...its free, all you need is a free server box.
Also Check out SharePoint Search and FAST enterprise search.http://www.microsoft.com/enterprisesearch [microsoft.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801353</id>
	<title>A couple of options</title>
	<author>Unhandled</author>
	<datestamp>1255952880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here's a few options you might want to consider:

1) Use Office SharePoint Server 2007 to index the share
2) Upgrade to Windows Server 2008 (or above)  and Windows Vista (or above) and use the Federated search feature: <a href="http://trycatch.be/blogs/roggenk/archive/2007/11/05/windows-vista-amp-windows-server-2008-federated-search.aspx" title="trycatch.be" rel="nofollow">http://trycatch.be/blogs/roggenk/archive/2007/11/05/windows-vista-amp-windows-server-2008-federated-search.aspx</a> [trycatch.be]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a few options you might want to consider : 1 ) Use Office SharePoint Server 2007 to index the share 2 ) Upgrade to Windows Server 2008 ( or above ) and Windows Vista ( or above ) and use the Federated search feature : http : //trycatch.be/blogs/roggenk/archive/2007/11/05/windows-vista-amp-windows-server-2008-federated-search.aspx [ trycatch.be ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a few options you might want to consider:

1) Use Office SharePoint Server 2007 to index the share
2) Upgrade to Windows Server 2008 (or above)  and Windows Vista (or above) and use the Federated search feature: http://trycatch.be/blogs/roggenk/archive/2007/11/05/windows-vista-amp-windows-server-2008-federated-search.aspx [trycatch.be]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806139</id>
	<title>Re:How about Spotlight? That works on shared volum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256044500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's Microsoft's fault.</p><p>Or then it's your fault for formatting something with NTFS, and then putting your data there.</p><p>Never blame Apple. All hail Apple.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's Microsoft 's fault.Or then it 's your fault for formatting something with NTFS , and then putting your data there.Never blame Apple .
All hail Apple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's Microsoft's fault.Or then it's your fault for formatting something with NTFS, and then putting your data there.Never blame Apple.
All hail Apple.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29841813</id>
	<title>Coogi suit,Afflication Hoody is Season Goods</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256217480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Welcome TO Our Website:  Http://www.tntshoes.com</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; we are a prefession online store, you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photos.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; pls find the more photos and the price for our product in our website,hellow see our website in the photos attached, on line shipping sotre, selling all kinds of brand new shoes,clothing, handbag,sunglasses,hats etc, if interested please email me by we are selling all brand new handbag, we take paypal as payment, . shoes Nike jordan1-23 $23-$28 free shiping.</p><p>
&nbsp; OUR WEBSITE:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcome TO Our Website : Http : //www.tntshoes.com         we are a prefession online store , you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photos .
          pls find the more photos and the price for our product in our website,hellow see our website in the photos attached , on line shipping sotre , selling all kinds of brand new shoes,clothing , handbag,sunglasses,hats etc , if interested please email me by we are selling all brand new handbag , we take paypal as payment , .
shoes Nike jordan1-23 $ 23- $ 28 free shiping .
  OUR WEBSITE :                                                         YAHOO : shoppertrade @ yahoo.com.cn                                                                 MSN : shoppertrade @ hotmail.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Welcome TO Our Website:  Http://www.tntshoes.com
        we are a prefession online store, you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photos.
          pls find the more photos and the price for our product in our website,hellow see our website in the photos attached, on line shipping sotre, selling all kinds of brand new shoes,clothing, handbag,sunglasses,hats etc, if interested please email me by we are selling all brand new handbag, we take paypal as payment, .
shoes Nike jordan1-23 $23-$28 free shiping.
  OUR WEBSITE:
                                                        YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn
                                                                MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801729</id>
	<title>ISYS</title>
	<author>indulgenc</author>
	<datestamp>1255954860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ISYS Search Software (<a href="http://www.isys-search.com/" title="isys-search.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.isys-search.com/</a> [isys-search.com]) has a variety of enterprise search applications.  Web based search interface or a local client depending on your needs.</p><p>-i</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ISYS Search Software ( http : //www.isys-search.com/ [ isys-search.com ] ) has a variety of enterprise search applications .
Web based search interface or a local client depending on your needs.-i</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ISYS Search Software (http://www.isys-search.com/ [isys-search.com]) has a variety of enterprise search applications.
Web based search interface or a local client depending on your needs.-i</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803679</id>
	<title>What are you trying to Index?</title>
	<author>sabre307</author>
	<datestamp>1255968720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you trying to index all files, or just documents, or what? If you are trying to cheap out on indexing documents, I highly recommend <a href="http://www.alfresco.com/" title="alfresco.com" rel="nofollow">Alfresco</a> [alfresco.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you trying to index all files , or just documents , or what ?
If you are trying to cheap out on indexing documents , I highly recommend Alfresco [ alfresco.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you trying to index all files, or just documents, or what?
If you are trying to cheap out on indexing documents, I highly recommend Alfresco [alfresco.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801521</id>
	<title>Why even ask?</title>
	<author>h4rr4r</author>
	<datestamp>1255953660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>slocate</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>slocate</tokentext>
<sentencetext>slocate</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804517</id>
	<title>xfriend can do this.</title>
	<author>yooy</author>
	<datestamp>1255979160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I use xfriend personal (20 US). For your problem you would need xfriend business:

<a href="http://www.xfriend.de/de/business/loesungen/" title="xfriend.de" rel="nofollow">http://www.xfriend.de/de/business/loesungen/</a> [xfriend.de]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I use xfriend personal ( 20 US ) .
For your problem you would need xfriend business : http : //www.xfriend.de/de/business/loesungen/ [ xfriend.de ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use xfriend personal (20 US).
For your problem you would need xfriend business:

http://www.xfriend.de/de/business/loesungen/ [xfriend.de]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801861</id>
	<title>Re:A couple of options</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1255955700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Here's a few options you might want to consider: 1) Use Office SharePoint Server 2007 to index the share</p></div><p>First, MOSS isn't free.</p><p>Second, have you ever actually tried using SharePoint 2007 text search feature? I dunno what it indexes, but finding anything in that afterwards is about as convenient as searching for a needle in a haystack.</p><p>There have been claims of some huge improvements in the upcoming SP2010, which is not surprising in light of Bing, but that's not released yet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a few options you might want to consider : 1 ) Use Office SharePoint Server 2007 to index the shareFirst , MOSS is n't free.Second , have you ever actually tried using SharePoint 2007 text search feature ?
I dunno what it indexes , but finding anything in that afterwards is about as convenient as searching for a needle in a haystack.There have been claims of some huge improvements in the upcoming SP2010 , which is not surprising in light of Bing , but that 's not released yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a few options you might want to consider: 1) Use Office SharePoint Server 2007 to index the shareFirst, MOSS isn't free.Second, have you ever actually tried using SharePoint 2007 text search feature?
I dunno what it indexes, but finding anything in that afterwards is about as convenient as searching for a needle in a haystack.There have been claims of some huge improvements in the upcoming SP2010, which is not surprising in light of Bing, but that's not released yet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801353</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801479</id>
	<title>Mirror it.</title>
	<author>palegray.net</author>
	<datestamp>1255953420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>You could just rsync the shared volume to a local drive as frequently as needed and run the search engine on the local copy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You could just rsync the shared volume to a local drive as frequently as needed and run the search engine on the local copy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could just rsync the shared volume to a local drive as frequently as needed and run the search engine on the local copy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29805695</id>
	<title>Re:A couple of options</title>
	<author>MrNemesis</author>
	<datestamp>1256039280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Coming from a company that made heavy use of sharepoint (2003 and 2007 - to be fair 2007 is aeons ahead of 2003 but inherited out projects' terrible design) I can heartily say that the index tool sucks, and the relevance engine is piss poor; no one could ever, ever find anything on the company intranet, and one of the helldesk's most idiotic tasks was keeping a bookmark of all the important sub-sites and documents on the intranet... and all because devs fell for the idiocy of the "don't bother organising it... it'll all be instantly SEARCHABLE... with LASERS!!!!!!!" spiel.</p><p>It took a google mini box to make our sharepoint cluster anywhere near usuable. Helldesk calls dropped 15\% the week the box went online.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Coming from a company that made heavy use of sharepoint ( 2003 and 2007 - to be fair 2007 is aeons ahead of 2003 but inherited out projects ' terrible design ) I can heartily say that the index tool sucks , and the relevance engine is piss poor ; no one could ever , ever find anything on the company intranet , and one of the helldesk 's most idiotic tasks was keeping a bookmark of all the important sub-sites and documents on the intranet... and all because devs fell for the idiocy of the " do n't bother organising it... it 'll all be instantly SEARCHABLE... with LASERS ! ! ! ! ! ! !
" spiel.It took a google mini box to make our sharepoint cluster anywhere near usuable .
Helldesk calls dropped 15 \ % the week the box went online .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Coming from a company that made heavy use of sharepoint (2003 and 2007 - to be fair 2007 is aeons ahead of 2003 but inherited out projects' terrible design) I can heartily say that the index tool sucks, and the relevance engine is piss poor; no one could ever, ever find anything on the company intranet, and one of the helldesk's most idiotic tasks was keeping a bookmark of all the important sub-sites and documents on the intranet... and all because devs fell for the idiocy of the "don't bother organising it... it'll all be instantly SEARCHABLE... with LASERS!!!!!!!
" spiel.It took a google mini box to make our sharepoint cluster anywhere near usuable.
Helldesk calls dropped 15\% the week the box went online.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801353</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801899</id>
	<title>I do it all the time</title>
	<author>krunchyfrog</author>
	<datestamp>1255955880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>updatedb<br>locate [bleh]</p><p>It's easy, really.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>updatedblocate [ bleh ] It 's easy , really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>updatedblocate [bleh]It's easy, really.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29845295</id>
	<title>How to ask my question (submit my own)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256308740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Someone know how i can submit my own question..</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone know how i can submit my own question. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone know how i can submit my own question..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804751</id>
	<title>Re:wow!</title>
	<author>pinkushun</author>
	<datestamp>1256069220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry for the late reply, was busy downloading the internet. anyway a good cheap solution would be to make the drive publicly shared, expose it to the web and search it through google using something like "company user password list site:YOUR\_PUBLIC\_IP". Post your results here so we can all test your indexing speed<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry for the late reply , was busy downloading the internet .
anyway a good cheap solution would be to make the drive publicly shared , expose it to the web and search it through google using something like " company user password list site : YOUR \ _PUBLIC \ _IP " .
Post your results here so we can all test your indexing speed : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry for the late reply, was busy downloading the internet.
anyway a good cheap solution would be to make the drive publicly shared, expose it to the web and search it through google using something like "company user password list site:YOUR\_PUBLIC\_IP".
Post your results here so we can all test your indexing speed :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801415</id>
	<title>Sharepoint Services</title>
	<author>anexkahn</author>
	<datestamp>1255953180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you have a windows server, you can tell Share point to index the file share.

See:
<a href="http://dotnetmafia.sys-con.com/node/1046930" title="sys-con.com" rel="nofollow">http://dotnetmafia.sys-con.com/node/1046930</a> [sys-con.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have a windows server , you can tell Share point to index the file share .
See : http : //dotnetmafia.sys-con.com/node/1046930 [ sys-con.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you have a windows server, you can tell Share point to index the file share.
See:
http://dotnetmafia.sys-con.com/node/1046930 [sys-con.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801733</id>
	<title>Re:the god-awful truth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255954860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't you mean,</p><blockquote><div><p> <tt>grep damnfunctionname -R . --include='*.php*' </tt></p></div> </blockquote><p>I guess if you're skipping perfectly cromulent indexing servers, you might as well needlessly break out the pipes, too.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't you mean , grep damnfunctionname -R .
--include = ' * .php * ' I guess if you 're skipping perfectly cromulent indexing servers , you might as well needlessly break out the pipes , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't you mean, grep damnfunctionname -R .
--include='*.php*'  I guess if you're skipping perfectly cromulent indexing servers, you might as well needlessly break out the pipes, too.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801525</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801595
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801527
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801375
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804221
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801527
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802003
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801525
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801525
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29836529
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801353
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801861
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801353
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801887
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803589
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801353
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801887
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803497
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29805963
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801797
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803211
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801353
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801887
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806105
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803213
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806917
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802895
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29829239
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801525
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801741
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802383
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801375
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29807003
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801527
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29805345
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29815971
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801525
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803427
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802071
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801353
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29805695
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802567
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801527
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803769
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801353
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801887
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29805461
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801353
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801887
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804861
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806417
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29811001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801353
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804931
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801527
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806151
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2147254_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801527
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801965
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806151
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29811001
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800715
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803885
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801987
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801689
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801605
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806417
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29805963
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801371
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801479
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801595
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29815971
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803497
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806917
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801375
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803383
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804221
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29807003
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800757
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803347
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802071
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803027
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801765
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29836529
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800771
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29809603
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802861
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801527
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801775
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802003
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802173
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806139
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803921
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29805345
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802069
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803769
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29800733
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803213
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804751
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802895
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29829239
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801419
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802567
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802015
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801569
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801797
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803211
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801891
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802581
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801521
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801353
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804931
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29805695
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801887
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29804861
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806149
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29806105
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803589
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29805461
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801861
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801525
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801741
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802383
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29803427
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29801733
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2147254.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2147254.29802439
</commentlist>
</conversation>
