<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_16_1410232</id>
	<title>Texas Teen Arrested Under New Online Harassment Law</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1255702620000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>SpaceGhost sends in a story from San Antonio, TX: <i>"Police have arrested a 16-year-old girl on charges of harassment under a new Texas law that took effect September 1, 2009. H.B. 2003 says a person commits a third degree <a href="http://www.khou.com/topstories/stories/khou09f1013\_jj\_teen-arrested-charges.213b32fe6.html">felony if the person posts one or more messages on a social networking site</a> with the intent to harm, defraud, intimidate or threaten another person. Police say the harassment went on for a few months and involved a dispute over a boy. ... Some people expect legal challenges to the constitutionality of the new Internet law.'</i> The law is evidently a response to the <a href="//news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/11/30/2014248&amp;tid=61">Lori Drew case</a>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>SpaceGhost sends in a story from San Antonio , TX : " Police have arrested a 16-year-old girl on charges of harassment under a new Texas law that took effect September 1 , 2009 .
H.B. 2003 says a person commits a third degree felony if the person posts one or more messages on a social networking site with the intent to harm , defraud , intimidate or threaten another person .
Police say the harassment went on for a few months and involved a dispute over a boy .
... Some people expect legal challenges to the constitutionality of the new Internet law .
' The law is evidently a response to the Lori Drew case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SpaceGhost sends in a story from San Antonio, TX: "Police have arrested a 16-year-old girl on charges of harassment under a new Texas law that took effect September 1, 2009.
H.B. 2003 says a person commits a third degree felony if the person posts one or more messages on a social networking site with the intent to harm, defraud, intimidate or threaten another person.
Police say the harassment went on for a few months and involved a dispute over a boy.
... Some people expect legal challenges to the constitutionality of the new Internet law.
' The law is evidently a response to the Lori Drew case.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768771</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255708560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this mean I can't threaten people on EVE for ransom money?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean I ca n't threaten people on EVE for ransom money ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean I can't threaten people on EVE for ransom money?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770571</id>
	<title>Re:socialnetdef</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255717560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the text of the law:<br>1)  "Commercial social networking site" means any<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; business, organization, or other similar entity operating a website<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; that permits persons to become registered users for the purpose of<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; establishing personal relationships with other users through<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; direct or real-time communication with other users or the creation<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; of web pages or profiles available to the public or to other users.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; The term does not include an electronic mail program or a message<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; board program.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the text of the law : 1 ) " Commercial social networking site " means any       business , organization , or other similar entity operating a website       that permits persons to become registered users for the purpose of       establishing personal relationships with other users through       direct or real-time communication with other users or the creation       of web pages or profiles available to the public or to other users .
      The term does not include an electronic mail program or a message       board program .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the text of the law:1)  "Commercial social networking site" means any
      business, organization, or other similar entity operating a website
      that permits persons to become registered users for the purpose of
      establishing personal relationships with other users through
      direct or real-time communication with other users or the creation
      of web pages or profiles available to the public or to other users.
      The term does not include an electronic mail program or a message
      board program.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768795</id>
	<title>Re:SHITCOCK!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255708740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wrong. Yes it is is.</p><p>
&nbsp; (With a few qualifications, the person being assaulted has to reasonably believe you will follow through and the threat has to be imminent. Saying "I'll kill you in two hours" doesn't count.)</p><p>
&nbsp; IANAL, but I am a law student.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wrong .
Yes it is is .
  ( With a few qualifications , the person being assaulted has to reasonably believe you will follow through and the threat has to be imminent .
Saying " I 'll kill you in two hours " does n't count .
)   IANAL , but I am a law student .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wrong.
Yes it is is.
  (With a few qualifications, the person being assaulted has to reasonably believe you will follow through and the threat has to be imminent.
Saying "I'll kill you in two hours" doesn't count.
)
  IANAL, but I am a law student.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768371</id>
	<title>Dear  Sir</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255706700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FROM: Dr Altaka Yurmani<br>Central Bank of Nigeria<br>Lagos, Nigeria<br>01-658-21-2658</p><p>TO: Fill-in-your-mark-here<br>Everytown, USA</p><p>Dear Sir:</p><p>I have been requested by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company to contact you for assistance in resolving a matter. The Nigerian National Petroleum Company has recently concluded a large number of contracts for oil exploration in the sub-Sahara region. The contracts have immediately produced moneys equaling US$40,000,000. The Nigerian National Petroleum Company is desirous of oil exploration in other parts of the world, however, because of certain regulations of the Nigerian Government, it is unable to move these funds to another region.</p><p>You assistance is requested as a non-Nigerian citizen to assist the Nigerian National Petroleum Company, and also the Central Bank of Nigeria, in moving these funds out of Nigeria. If the funds can be transferred to your name, in your United States account, then you can forward the funds as directed by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company. In exchange for your accommodating services, the Nigerian National Petroleum Company would agree to allow you to retain 10\%, or US$4 million of this amount.</p><p>However, to be a legitimate transferee of these moneys according to Nigerian law, you must presently be a depositor of at least US$100,000 in a Nigerian bank which is regulated by the Central Bank of Nigeria.</p><p>If it will be possible for you to assist us, we would be most grateful. We suggest that you meet with us in person in Lagos, and that during your visit I introduce you to the representatives of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company, as well as with certain officials of the Central Bank of Nigeria.</p><p>Please call me at your earliest convenience at 18-467-4975. Time is of the essence in this matter; very quickly the Nigerian Government will realize that the Central Bank is maintaining this amount on deposit, and attempt to levy certain depository taxes on it.</p><p>Yours truly,</p><p>Prince Alyusi Islassis</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FROM : Dr Altaka YurmaniCentral Bank of NigeriaLagos , Nigeria01-658-21-2658TO : Fill-in-your-mark-hereEverytown , USADear Sir : I have been requested by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company to contact you for assistance in resolving a matter .
The Nigerian National Petroleum Company has recently concluded a large number of contracts for oil exploration in the sub-Sahara region .
The contracts have immediately produced moneys equaling US $ 40,000,000 .
The Nigerian National Petroleum Company is desirous of oil exploration in other parts of the world , however , because of certain regulations of the Nigerian Government , it is unable to move these funds to another region.You assistance is requested as a non-Nigerian citizen to assist the Nigerian National Petroleum Company , and also the Central Bank of Nigeria , in moving these funds out of Nigeria .
If the funds can be transferred to your name , in your United States account , then you can forward the funds as directed by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company .
In exchange for your accommodating services , the Nigerian National Petroleum Company would agree to allow you to retain 10 \ % , or US $ 4 million of this amount.However , to be a legitimate transferee of these moneys according to Nigerian law , you must presently be a depositor of at least US $ 100,000 in a Nigerian bank which is regulated by the Central Bank of Nigeria.If it will be possible for you to assist us , we would be most grateful .
We suggest that you meet with us in person in Lagos , and that during your visit I introduce you to the representatives of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company , as well as with certain officials of the Central Bank of Nigeria.Please call me at your earliest convenience at 18-467-4975 .
Time is of the essence in this matter ; very quickly the Nigerian Government will realize that the Central Bank is maintaining this amount on deposit , and attempt to levy certain depository taxes on it.Yours truly,Prince Alyusi Islassis</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FROM: Dr Altaka YurmaniCentral Bank of NigeriaLagos, Nigeria01-658-21-2658TO: Fill-in-your-mark-hereEverytown, USADear Sir:I have been requested by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company to contact you for assistance in resolving a matter.
The Nigerian National Petroleum Company has recently concluded a large number of contracts for oil exploration in the sub-Sahara region.
The contracts have immediately produced moneys equaling US$40,000,000.
The Nigerian National Petroleum Company is desirous of oil exploration in other parts of the world, however, because of certain regulations of the Nigerian Government, it is unable to move these funds to another region.You assistance is requested as a non-Nigerian citizen to assist the Nigerian National Petroleum Company, and also the Central Bank of Nigeria, in moving these funds out of Nigeria.
If the funds can be transferred to your name, in your United States account, then you can forward the funds as directed by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company.
In exchange for your accommodating services, the Nigerian National Petroleum Company would agree to allow you to retain 10\%, or US$4 million of this amount.However, to be a legitimate transferee of these moneys according to Nigerian law, you must presently be a depositor of at least US$100,000 in a Nigerian bank which is regulated by the Central Bank of Nigeria.If it will be possible for you to assist us, we would be most grateful.
We suggest that you meet with us in person in Lagos, and that during your visit I introduce you to the representatives of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company, as well as with certain officials of the Central Bank of Nigeria.Please call me at your earliest convenience at 18-467-4975.
Time is of the essence in this matter; very quickly the Nigerian Government will realize that the Central Bank is maintaining this amount on deposit, and attempt to levy certain depository taxes on it.Yours truly,Prince Alyusi Islassis</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771351</id>
	<title>Re:socialnetdef</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1255721460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not until they institute a '-1 VerbalTeabagging' moderation<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... or should that be a +1?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not until they institute a '-1 VerbalTeabagging ' moderation .... or should that be a + 1 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not until they institute a '-1 VerbalTeabagging' moderation .... or should that be a +1?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768563</id>
	<title>Existing case law?</title>
	<author>rayharris</author>
	<datestamp>1255707660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is there any existing case law that confirms that "IRL" speech with "intent to harm, defraud, intimidate, or threaten" is a felony? If so, then just because it's online, doesn't mean you can get away with it.</p><p>I can see "defraud" (I promise a 15\% return on your investment) and "threaten" (Steal my girl and I'll cap your knees) as speech types that aren't protected, but I'm not so sure about "harm" and "intimidate". We'll just have to see. One things for certain, it'll make an interesting case to watch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there any existing case law that confirms that " IRL " speech with " intent to harm , defraud , intimidate , or threaten " is a felony ?
If so , then just because it 's online , does n't mean you can get away with it.I can see " defraud " ( I promise a 15 \ % return on your investment ) and " threaten " ( Steal my girl and I 'll cap your knees ) as speech types that are n't protected , but I 'm not so sure about " harm " and " intimidate " .
We 'll just have to see .
One things for certain , it 'll make an interesting case to watch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there any existing case law that confirms that "IRL" speech with "intent to harm, defraud, intimidate, or threaten" is a felony?
If so, then just because it's online, doesn't mean you can get away with it.I can see "defraud" (I promise a 15\% return on your investment) and "threaten" (Steal my girl and I'll cap your knees) as speech types that aren't protected, but I'm not so sure about "harm" and "intimidate".
We'll just have to see.
One things for certain, it'll make an interesting case to watch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772945</id>
	<title>Re:Newsflash: Teenagers are stupid and selfish</title>
	<author>guyminuslife</author>
	<datestamp>1255687140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll buy them off of you for a good price.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll buy them off of you for a good price .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll buy them off of you for a good price.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769957</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768471</id>
	<title>Yes. I'm OK with this law.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255707240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just leave the goatse/tubgirl redirectors alone!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just leave the goatse/tubgirl redirectors alone !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just leave the goatse/tubgirl redirectors alone!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768665</id>
	<title>What she should have done..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255708200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What she should have done is get her victim to sign up to some app with small print in the "Accept" opting in to the harassment emails. After all it <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/10/15/2027250/Toyota-Claims-Woman-Opted-In-To-Faux-Email-Stalking" title="slashdot.org">worked for Toyota</a> [slashdot.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>What she should have done is get her victim to sign up to some app with small print in the " Accept " opting in to the harassment emails .
After all it worked for Toyota [ slashdot.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What she should have done is get her victim to sign up to some app with small print in the "Accept" opting in to the harassment emails.
After all it worked for Toyota [slashdot.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768731</id>
	<title>Re:Idiocracy</title>
	<author>Jeian</author>
	<datestamp>1255708380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Words don't hurt people, but they do cause some people to hurt themselves.</p><p>Whether that should be illegal, in real life or online, is the question.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Words do n't hurt people , but they do cause some people to hurt themselves.Whether that should be illegal , in real life or online , is the question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Words don't hurt people, but they do cause some people to hurt themselves.Whether that should be illegal, in real life or online, is the question.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768381</id>
	<title>Two to Ten Years and Up To Ten Grand</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1255706760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>

Apparently Texas' penal code reads for <a href="http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/PE/htm/PE.12.htm" title="state.tx.us">felonies of the third degree</a> [state.tx.us]:<blockquote><div><p> <tt>12.34. THIRD DEGREE FELONY PUNISHMENT. (a) An individual adjudged guilty of a felony of the third degree shall be punished by imprisonment in the institutional division for any term of not more than 10 years or less than 2 years.<br> <br>(b) In addition to imprisonment, an individual adjudged guilty of a felony of the third degree may be punished by a fine not to exceed $10,000.</tt></p></div> </blockquote><p>Of course, she's a minor being 16 so the punishment will most likely be up to the judge and expunged at age 18 but for you adults who like to poke and prod people online<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... better think twice in states where these kind of laws are enforced lest you target the wrong person.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently Texas ' penal code reads for felonies of the third degree [ state.tx.us ] : 12.34 .
THIRD DEGREE FELONY PUNISHMENT .
( a ) An individual adjudged guilty of a felony of the third degree shall be punished by imprisonment in the institutional division for any term of not more than 10 years or less than 2 years .
( b ) In addition to imprisonment , an individual adjudged guilty of a felony of the third degree may be punished by a fine not to exceed $ 10,000 .
Of course , she 's a minor being 16 so the punishment will most likely be up to the judge and expunged at age 18 but for you adults who like to poke and prod people online ... better think twice in states where these kind of laws are enforced lest you target the wrong person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>

Apparently Texas' penal code reads for felonies of the third degree [state.tx.us]: 12.34.
THIRD DEGREE FELONY PUNISHMENT.
(a) An individual adjudged guilty of a felony of the third degree shall be punished by imprisonment in the institutional division for any term of not more than 10 years or less than 2 years.
(b) In addition to imprisonment, an individual adjudged guilty of a felony of the third degree may be punished by a fine not to exceed $10,000.
Of course, she's a minor being 16 so the punishment will most likely be up to the judge and expunged at age 18 but for you adults who like to poke and prod people online ... better think twice in states where these kind of laws are enforced lest you target the wrong person.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768905</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>cbreaker</author>
	<datestamp>1255709220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree with you that this is no laughing matter.   It's libel, and defamation of character.  And, I DO agree that this girl should be punished if this went on ruthlessly for months.<br><br>But a felony conviction for a kid?   She'll live with that on her criminal record for the rest of her life and she'll have a hard time getting good work..</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree with you that this is no laughing matter .
It 's libel , and defamation of character .
And , I DO agree that this girl should be punished if this went on ruthlessly for months.But a felony conviction for a kid ?
She 'll live with that on her criminal record for the rest of her life and she 'll have a hard time getting good work. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree with you that this is no laughing matter.
It's libel, and defamation of character.
And, I DO agree that this girl should be punished if this went on ruthlessly for months.But a felony conviction for a kid?
She'll live with that on her criminal record for the rest of her life and she'll have a hard time getting good work..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769637</id>
	<title>Does Slashdot qualify?</title>
	<author>mi</author>
	<datestamp>1255712940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>H.B. 2003 says a person commits a third degree felony if the person posts one or more messages on a social networking site with the intent to harm, defraud, intimidate or threaten another person.</p></div></blockquote><p>20-30\% of Slashdot responses could cause prosecution in Texas, if the site qualifies as a "social networking". Note, that you don't have to actually successfully intimidate, you just have to <em>intend</em> to, however pathetic your attempt may be...

</p><p>I know, I'm guilty on, at least, several counts...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>H.B .
2003 says a person commits a third degree felony if the person posts one or more messages on a social networking site with the intent to harm , defraud , intimidate or threaten another person.20-30 \ % of Slashdot responses could cause prosecution in Texas , if the site qualifies as a " social networking " .
Note , that you do n't have to actually successfully intimidate , you just have to intend to , however pathetic your attempt may be.. . I know , I 'm guilty on , at least , several counts.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>H.B.
2003 says a person commits a third degree felony if the person posts one or more messages on a social networking site with the intent to harm, defraud, intimidate or threaten another person.20-30\% of Slashdot responses could cause prosecution in Texas, if the site qualifies as a "social networking".
Note, that you don't have to actually successfully intimidate, you just have to intend to, however pathetic your attempt may be...

I know, I'm guilty on, at least, several counts...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768587</id>
	<title>.... on internet</title>
	<author>iamacat</author>
	<datestamp>1255707780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why punish based on medium rather than content? Is it any different from posting paper threatening messages on a school bulletin board? Again, lawmakers think Internet has some scary magic powers rather than being a new communication medium for old humans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why punish based on medium rather than content ?
Is it any different from posting paper threatening messages on a school bulletin board ?
Again , lawmakers think Internet has some scary magic powers rather than being a new communication medium for old humans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why punish based on medium rather than content?
Is it any different from posting paper threatening messages on a school bulletin board?
Again, lawmakers think Internet has some scary magic powers rather than being a new communication medium for old humans.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768985</id>
	<title>chief's words</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1255709640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><em>"So, even if you're joking sometimes it can really hurt people and now it's against the law,"  said Chief Chavez. </em>

<p>What part of <b>intent</b> don't they understand?</p><p>
<em>a third degree felony if the person posts one or more messages on a social networking site with the intent to harm, defraud, intimidate or threaten another person. </em>
</p><p>
Clearly, "joking" indicates an intent to humor, to cause laughter, not an intent to harm.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" So , even if you 're joking sometimes it can really hurt people and now it 's against the law , " said Chief Chavez .
What part of intent do n't they understand ?
a third degree felony if the person posts one or more messages on a social networking site with the intent to harm , defraud , intimidate or threaten another person .
Clearly , " joking " indicates an intent to humor , to cause laughter , not an intent to harm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"So, even if you're joking sometimes it can really hurt people and now it's against the law,"  said Chief Chavez.
What part of intent don't they understand?
a third degree felony if the person posts one or more messages on a social networking site with the intent to harm, defraud, intimidate or threaten another person.
Clearly, "joking" indicates an intent to humor, to cause laughter, not an intent to harm.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769963</id>
	<title>Re:Idiocracy</title>
	<author>bconway</author>
	<datestamp>1255714440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Obviously Texas lawmakers are unfamiliar with the legal principle "Sticks and stones make break my bones, but words will never hurt me!"</p></div><p>Ask Megan Meier's parents how well that's working out for them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously Texas lawmakers are unfamiliar with the legal principle " Sticks and stones make break my bones , but words will never hurt me !
" Ask Megan Meier 's parents how well that 's working out for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously Texas lawmakers are unfamiliar with the legal principle "Sticks and stones make break my bones, but words will never hurt me!
"Ask Megan Meier's parents how well that's working out for them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29794535</id>
	<title>There goes my dreams</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255968780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There goes my dreams of being harassed by 16 year old girls.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There goes my dreams of being harassed by 16 year old girls .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There goes my dreams of being harassed by 16 year old girls.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769041</id>
	<title>I wish the Internet had never gone mainstream.</title>
	<author>BlueKitties</author>
	<datestamp>1255709820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The moment overprotective parents and eurosocialist progressives realized the Internet existed, we have had a huge boom of twits who think they can just join in and start passing laws. For christsake, I've been on the Internet since AOL was metering dialup usage -- you weren't here, ignorant masses, and neither were your ignorant oppressive laws. If you don't like our Internet, get out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The moment overprotective parents and eurosocialist progressives realized the Internet existed , we have had a huge boom of twits who think they can just join in and start passing laws .
For christsake , I 've been on the Internet since AOL was metering dialup usage -- you were n't here , ignorant masses , and neither were your ignorant oppressive laws .
If you do n't like our Internet , get out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The moment overprotective parents and eurosocialist progressives realized the Internet existed, we have had a huge boom of twits who think they can just join in and start passing laws.
For christsake, I've been on the Internet since AOL was metering dialup usage -- you weren't here, ignorant masses, and neither were your ignorant oppressive laws.
If you don't like our Internet, get out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769987</id>
	<title>Re:socialnetdef</title>
	<author>Nerdfest</author>
	<datestamp>1255714620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Historically it's been more of an anti-social networking site.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Historically it 's been more of an anti-social networking site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Historically it's been more of an anti-social networking site.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29774811</id>
	<title>Re:Good Idea</title>
	<author>Osinoche</author>
	<datestamp>1255701480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not the same dooohickey.
We don't have headmaster's in the US.
If we did we'd call the school Principles.
Emotional trauma is covered under something
called a Law Suit.
Deal with it .
SUE HIM SUE HIM SUE HIM.
Him being Captain Picard, love of Goats.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not the same dooohickey .
We do n't have headmaster 's in the US .
If we did we 'd call the school Principles .
Emotional trauma is covered under something called a Law Suit .
Deal with it .
SUE HIM SUE HIM SUE HIM .
Him being Captain Picard , love of Goats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not the same dooohickey.
We don't have headmaster's in the US.
If we did we'd call the school Principles.
Emotional trauma is covered under something
called a Law Suit.
Deal with it .
SUE HIM SUE HIM SUE HIM.
Him being Captain Picard, love of Goats.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768527</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>qortra</author>
	<datestamp>1255707540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why does this need to be a felony?  Support your claim with evidence.  At the risk of sounding heartless, teen suicide is not sufficient evidence on its own; there is plenty of that when neither the internet nor harassment is involved.<br> <br>
More than that, can you show that this particular instance should be a felony?<p><div class="quote"><p>Details of the incident weren't made available, but police say the harassment went on for a few months and involved a dispute over a boy.</p></div><p>That seems pretty vague to me.  Should we throw every middle school student into the hoosegow?  Typically, middle school is 3 years of constant harassment, and it definitely involves boys.<br> <br>I'd bet money that this particular instance is a non-issue.  The parents of the "victim" probably knew the sheriff.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does this need to be a felony ?
Support your claim with evidence .
At the risk of sounding heartless , teen suicide is not sufficient evidence on its own ; there is plenty of that when neither the internet nor harassment is involved .
More than that , can you show that this particular instance should be a felony ? Details of the incident were n't made available , but police say the harassment went on for a few months and involved a dispute over a boy.That seems pretty vague to me .
Should we throw every middle school student into the hoosegow ?
Typically , middle school is 3 years of constant harassment , and it definitely involves boys .
I 'd bet money that this particular instance is a non-issue .
The parents of the " victim " probably knew the sheriff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does this need to be a felony?
Support your claim with evidence.
At the risk of sounding heartless, teen suicide is not sufficient evidence on its own; there is plenty of that when neither the internet nor harassment is involved.
More than that, can you show that this particular instance should be a felony?Details of the incident weren't made available, but police say the harassment went on for a few months and involved a dispute over a boy.That seems pretty vague to me.
Should we throw every middle school student into the hoosegow?
Typically, middle school is 3 years of constant harassment, and it definitely involves boys.
I'd bet money that this particular instance is a non-issue.
The parents of the "victim" probably knew the sheriff.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768513</id>
	<title>List of Texas' Third Degree Felonies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255707420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry to reply to myself but I found a <a href="http://wiki.grinterlaw.com/index.php/Third\_Degree\_Felony" title="grinterlaw.com">list of felonies in the third degree for the state of Texas</a> [grinterlaw.com] if you want to compare this new law to older laws resulting in the same degree of punishment.  Apparently a third degree felony punishment (as noted in my parent post) can be meted out for anything ranging from arson to assault to <a href="http://www.bingointexas.com/questions.html#5" title="bingointexas.com">conducting a game of bingo without a license</a> [bingointexas.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry to reply to myself but I found a list of felonies in the third degree for the state of Texas [ grinterlaw.com ] if you want to compare this new law to older laws resulting in the same degree of punishment .
Apparently a third degree felony punishment ( as noted in my parent post ) can be meted out for anything ranging from arson to assault to conducting a game of bingo without a license [ bingointexas.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry to reply to myself but I found a list of felonies in the third degree for the state of Texas [grinterlaw.com] if you want to compare this new law to older laws resulting in the same degree of punishment.
Apparently a third degree felony punishment (as noted in my parent post) can be meted out for anything ranging from arson to assault to conducting a game of bingo without a license [bingointexas.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770361</id>
	<title>Re:Good Idea</title>
	<author>tsstahl</author>
	<datestamp>1255716540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, the kid should spend 2 years minimum in jail for being immature?  Where is the freedom to explore in your world?  The range of human conduct is not constrained to rainbow surfing and unicorn hugging.  Adolescence is the epitome of exploration.  Consequences should match the conduct, not be emotionally charged.
<br> <br>
Your argument is in essence a declaration that punks should go to jail because your little brother feels bad.
<br> <br>
Wouldn't an \_administrative\_ fine of say, 1500 bucks, to the parents send the appropriate signal that society is not going to tolerate that kind of conduct?  And why expel the kid?  You can make his life much more hellish by meting out punishment in school.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , the kid should spend 2 years minimum in jail for being immature ?
Where is the freedom to explore in your world ?
The range of human conduct is not constrained to rainbow surfing and unicorn hugging .
Adolescence is the epitome of exploration .
Consequences should match the conduct , not be emotionally charged .
Your argument is in essence a declaration that punks should go to jail because your little brother feels bad .
Would n't an \ _administrative \ _ fine of say , 1500 bucks , to the parents send the appropriate signal that society is not going to tolerate that kind of conduct ?
And why expel the kid ?
You can make his life much more hellish by meting out punishment in school .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, the kid should spend 2 years minimum in jail for being immature?
Where is the freedom to explore in your world?
The range of human conduct is not constrained to rainbow surfing and unicorn hugging.
Adolescence is the epitome of exploration.
Consequences should match the conduct, not be emotionally charged.
Your argument is in essence a declaration that punks should go to jail because your little brother feels bad.
Wouldn't an \_administrative\_ fine of say, 1500 bucks, to the parents send the appropriate signal that society is not going to tolerate that kind of conduct?
And why expel the kid?
You can make his life much more hellish by meting out punishment in school.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773421</id>
	<title>Re:think of the trolls!</title>
	<author>4D6963</author>
	<datestamp>1255690320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stay anonymous.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stay anonymous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stay anonymous.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768343</id>
	<title>start them early</title>
	<author>CaptainNerdCave</author>
	<datestamp>1255706520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>we'd better get these young people used to the idea that everyone is a criminal, no sense in letting them think they ever were or ever could be innocent.  after all, there's no way to rule law-abiding citizens.</htmltext>
<tokenext>we 'd better get these young people used to the idea that everyone is a criminal , no sense in letting them think they ever were or ever could be innocent .
after all , there 's no way to rule law-abiding citizens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we'd better get these young people used to the idea that everyone is a criminal, no sense in letting them think they ever were or ever could be innocent.
after all, there's no way to rule law-abiding citizens.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769009</id>
	<title>This law makes me angry.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255709760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is one giant leap down a path that leads to no good. These types of new laws makes me angry. How much power do I lack in my own life if one cannot say another is stupid in a fictitious cyber world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is one giant leap down a path that leads to no good .
These types of new laws makes me angry .
How much power do I lack in my own life if one can not say another is stupid in a fictitious cyber world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is one giant leap down a path that leads to no good.
These types of new laws makes me angry.
How much power do I lack in my own life if one cannot say another is stupid in a fictitious cyber world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768367</id>
	<title>SHITCOCK!</title>
	<author>e2d2</author>
	<datestamp>1255706700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's a big difference between saying "This person, IMHO, is an asshole" and "I'm gonna punch your face until you bleed from the asshole" (just an example, I have never ever said such horrendous things. I'm appalled that you would take me for that kind of person you fucking piece of shit! I'LL KILL YOU!)</p><p>But seriously, I tell my kid and other kids in my family - don't say anything you wouldn't say in person. And if you threaten someone in person, well that's assault.</p><p>People need to learn that being a SHITCOCK Internet Fuckwad is unacceptable. People also need to grow thicker skin, but when it truly hurts someone it's time to stop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a big difference between saying " This person , IMHO , is an asshole " and " I 'm gon na punch your face until you bleed from the asshole " ( just an example , I have never ever said such horrendous things .
I 'm appalled that you would take me for that kind of person you fucking piece of shit !
I 'LL KILL YOU !
) But seriously , I tell my kid and other kids in my family - do n't say anything you would n't say in person .
And if you threaten someone in person , well that 's assault.People need to learn that being a SHITCOCK Internet Fuckwad is unacceptable .
People also need to grow thicker skin , but when it truly hurts someone it 's time to stop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a big difference between saying "This person, IMHO, is an asshole" and "I'm gonna punch your face until you bleed from the asshole" (just an example, I have never ever said such horrendous things.
I'm appalled that you would take me for that kind of person you fucking piece of shit!
I'LL KILL YOU!
)But seriously, I tell my kid and other kids in my family - don't say anything you wouldn't say in person.
And if you threaten someone in person, well that's assault.People need to learn that being a SHITCOCK Internet Fuckwad is unacceptable.
People also need to grow thicker skin, but when it truly hurts someone it's time to stop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770197</id>
	<title>Re:Approached from the wrong angle</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255715580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>emotional/psychological reasons that these kids are attacking each other</p></div><p>Bad parenting coupled with a heavily degenerating school system.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>emotional/psychological reasons that these kids are attacking each otherBad parenting coupled with a heavily degenerating school system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>emotional/psychological reasons that these kids are attacking each otherBad parenting coupled with a heavily degenerating school system.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768923</id>
	<title>You can't mod me down.</title>
	<author>clandonald</author>
	<datestamp>1255709340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It might hurt my feelings and then you goto jail. <br> Hurt feeling is a stupid basis for anything my wifes feelings get hurt if I tell her to wake up in the morning. And if I text her back that I'm not going to the bar to get her wings at midnight then her feelings are hurt. Well she is 250 LB because since we got married she does nothing but eat and sit on her ass. And any effort to get her to do anything hurts her feelings so she has to eat more just to show me she can get even fatter. <br> Hurt feelings are stupid people need to grow up and stop being such wuussies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It might hurt my feelings and then you goto jail .
Hurt feeling is a stupid basis for anything my wifes feelings get hurt if I tell her to wake up in the morning .
And if I text her back that I 'm not going to the bar to get her wings at midnight then her feelings are hurt .
Well she is 250 LB because since we got married she does nothing but eat and sit on her ass .
And any effort to get her to do anything hurts her feelings so she has to eat more just to show me she can get even fatter .
Hurt feelings are stupid people need to grow up and stop being such wuussies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It might hurt my feelings and then you goto jail.
Hurt feeling is a stupid basis for anything my wifes feelings get hurt if I tell her to wake up in the morning.
And if I text her back that I'm not going to the bar to get her wings at midnight then her feelings are hurt.
Well she is 250 LB because since we got married she does nothing but eat and sit on her ass.
And any effort to get her to do anything hurts her feelings so she has to eat more just to show me she can get even fatter.
Hurt feelings are stupid people need to grow up and stop being such wuussies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769383</id>
	<title>Harmful?  Are they kidding???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255711680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will this law ever make it past the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals?</p><p>It looks really overbroad.  I can say something with the intent to harm you that is totally legal and absolutely protected by the First Amendment.  I can say harmful things with the intent to harm your business interests (by advancing mine at your expense); I can say harmful things with the intent to harm your political interest (to get your sorry ass out of office); and I can say harmful things with the intent to harm your religious interest (because your religious influence is heretical).</p><p>It also appears (from the lame summary and article) that truth is no defense.  So, that if I harm you with the truth--I can go to prison.</p><p>And that's only some ideas from the point of view of the POSTER.</p><p>The social networking sites themselves are getting screwed over, here.  What is the COMPELLING governmental reason for jacking up the criminal speech regulation on social networking sites and not on blogs and newspapers?????  There is no compelling reason for such a limitation on free speech and my bet is that some lawyers are going to have an easy, fun, and lucrative time taking this law DOWNTOWN.</p><p>Anyway, thanks very much to the Texas legislature for providing another money-stream to the lawyers.  They'll be the only ones having fun with this dog of a law!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will this law ever make it past the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ? It looks really overbroad .
I can say something with the intent to harm you that is totally legal and absolutely protected by the First Amendment .
I can say harmful things with the intent to harm your business interests ( by advancing mine at your expense ) ; I can say harmful things with the intent to harm your political interest ( to get your sorry ass out of office ) ; and I can say harmful things with the intent to harm your religious interest ( because your religious influence is heretical ) .It also appears ( from the lame summary and article ) that truth is no defense .
So , that if I harm you with the truth--I can go to prison.And that 's only some ideas from the point of view of the POSTER.The social networking sites themselves are getting screwed over , here .
What is the COMPELLING governmental reason for jacking up the criminal speech regulation on social networking sites and not on blogs and newspapers ? ? ? ? ?
There is no compelling reason for such a limitation on free speech and my bet is that some lawyers are going to have an easy , fun , and lucrative time taking this law DOWNTOWN.Anyway , thanks very much to the Texas legislature for providing another money-stream to the lawyers .
They 'll be the only ones having fun with this dog of a law !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will this law ever make it past the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals?It looks really overbroad.
I can say something with the intent to harm you that is totally legal and absolutely protected by the First Amendment.
I can say harmful things with the intent to harm your business interests (by advancing mine at your expense); I can say harmful things with the intent to harm your political interest (to get your sorry ass out of office); and I can say harmful things with the intent to harm your religious interest (because your religious influence is heretical).It also appears (from the lame summary and article) that truth is no defense.
So, that if I harm you with the truth--I can go to prison.And that's only some ideas from the point of view of the POSTER.The social networking sites themselves are getting screwed over, here.
What is the COMPELLING governmental reason for jacking up the criminal speech regulation on social networking sites and not on blogs and newspapers?????
There is no compelling reason for such a limitation on free speech and my bet is that some lawyers are going to have an easy, fun, and lucrative time taking this law DOWNTOWN.Anyway, thanks very much to the Texas legislature for providing another money-stream to the lawyers.
They'll be the only ones having fun with this dog of a law!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769393</id>
	<title>Vigorous enforcement doesn't imply harsh penalty</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1255711740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Having been a victim of such harassment in the past myself I agree wholeheartedly [should be felony] I reported it to the police however they fairly resoundingly didn't appear to give a toss.</p> </div><p>Do you believe this girl deserves a minimum stint of 2 years in jail with a maximum of 10 plus a fine up to $10,000?</p></div><p>It might be possible for the police force to actively and vigorously enforce a particular law and still have punishments that are reasonable taking the nature and consequences of the actual crime (or misdemeanor, or miscellaneous bad deed) into consideration.</p><p>Hypothetically, at least<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>Would that perhaps be a good thing?</p><p>(I think) I believe people should be protected from harassment if it really damages them.  It should be enforced, but the punishment should fit the crime.</p><p>It's maybe somewhat analogous to stupid enforcement of child porn laws.  Anything without mutual informed consent is bad; whatever people do in their own homes that stays there and doesn't harm anyone is not something I should have any say about, and I defer having an opinion about the remaining 0.1\% of the cases.  That would be a decent set of principles to enforce.  But punishing two mid-teen adolescents for having sex with each other (with mutual consent) and taking pictures of it (with consent) is just stupid.</p><p>Protect people, enforce good rules, but don't banish people from society just because they call others a poopface.</p><p>Restraining orders, house arrest, surveillance... they might be a good start?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Having been a victim of such harassment in the past myself I agree wholeheartedly [ should be felony ] I reported it to the police however they fairly resoundingly did n't appear to give a toss .
Do you believe this girl deserves a minimum stint of 2 years in jail with a maximum of 10 plus a fine up to $ 10,000 ? It might be possible for the police force to actively and vigorously enforce a particular law and still have punishments that are reasonable taking the nature and consequences of the actual crime ( or misdemeanor , or miscellaneous bad deed ) into consideration.Hypothetically , at least ; - ) Would that perhaps be a good thing ?
( I think ) I believe people should be protected from harassment if it really damages them .
It should be enforced , but the punishment should fit the crime.It 's maybe somewhat analogous to stupid enforcement of child porn laws .
Anything without mutual informed consent is bad ; whatever people do in their own homes that stays there and does n't harm anyone is not something I should have any say about , and I defer having an opinion about the remaining 0.1 \ % of the cases .
That would be a decent set of principles to enforce .
But punishing two mid-teen adolescents for having sex with each other ( with mutual consent ) and taking pictures of it ( with consent ) is just stupid.Protect people , enforce good rules , but do n't banish people from society just because they call others a poopface.Restraining orders , house arrest , surveillance... they might be a good start ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having been a victim of such harassment in the past myself I agree wholeheartedly [should be felony] I reported it to the police however they fairly resoundingly didn't appear to give a toss.
Do you believe this girl deserves a minimum stint of 2 years in jail with a maximum of 10 plus a fine up to $10,000?It might be possible for the police force to actively and vigorously enforce a particular law and still have punishments that are reasonable taking the nature and consequences of the actual crime (or misdemeanor, or miscellaneous bad deed) into consideration.Hypothetically, at least ;-)Would that perhaps be a good thing?
(I think) I believe people should be protected from harassment if it really damages them.
It should be enforced, but the punishment should fit the crime.It's maybe somewhat analogous to stupid enforcement of child porn laws.
Anything without mutual informed consent is bad; whatever people do in their own homes that stays there and doesn't harm anyone is not something I should have any say about, and I defer having an opinion about the remaining 0.1\% of the cases.
That would be a decent set of principles to enforce.
But punishing two mid-teen adolescents for having sex with each other (with mutual consent) and taking pictures of it (with consent) is just stupid.Protect people, enforce good rules, but don't banish people from society just because they call others a poopface.Restraining orders, house arrest, surveillance... they might be a good start?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768829</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768377</id>
	<title>Hard cases...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255706760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...make bad laws.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...make bad laws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...make bad laws.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769913</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>Gerafix</author>
	<datestamp>1255714320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's also amazingly hypocritical, if they are going to treat these youngsters like adults let them make choices like adults as well. If they're willing to throw you in prison to get raped I think you should be able to smoke and drink like any other adult, etc etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's also amazingly hypocritical , if they are going to treat these youngsters like adults let them make choices like adults as well .
If they 're willing to throw you in prison to get raped I think you should be able to smoke and drink like any other adult , etc etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's also amazingly hypocritical, if they are going to treat these youngsters like adults let them make choices like adults as well.
If they're willing to throw you in prison to get raped I think you should be able to smoke and drink like any other adult, etc etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768829</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770299</id>
	<title>Re:Good Idea</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1255716120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>WHY DOES IT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH BEING ONLINE? All of those actions that happened to your brother fall under intimidation and harassment laws already in place... why not use those? This law is not a good idea. There is NOTHING special about being a jackass online. It's the same as being a jackass anywhere else. It needs no special legislation that can be abused.</htmltext>
<tokenext>WHY DOES IT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH BEING ONLINE ?
All of those actions that happened to your brother fall under intimidation and harassment laws already in place... why not use those ?
This law is not a good idea .
There is NOTHING special about being a jackass online .
It 's the same as being a jackass anywhere else .
It needs no special legislation that can be abused .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WHY DOES IT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH BEING ONLINE?
All of those actions that happened to your brother fall under intimidation and harassment laws already in place... why not use those?
This law is not a good idea.
There is NOTHING special about being a jackass online.
It's the same as being a jackass anywhere else.
It needs no special legislation that can be abused.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768877</id>
	<title>details man, i gotta have details</title>
	<author>FudRucker</author>
	<datestamp>1255709040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>harassment is not the same as trolling i hope.<br> <br>

I can get to be a really nasty troll on craigslist messageboards, I don't threaten anyone, I just really snide with four letter words (really really snide and cuss like a drunken sailor)</htmltext>
<tokenext>harassment is not the same as trolling i hope .
I can get to be a really nasty troll on craigslist messageboards , I do n't threaten anyone , I just really snide with four letter words ( really really snide and cuss like a drunken sailor )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>harassment is not the same as trolling i hope.
I can get to be a really nasty troll on craigslist messageboards, I don't threaten anyone, I just really snide with four letter words (really really snide and cuss like a drunken sailor)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772745</id>
	<title>Surely felony is a bit much</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1255686060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This really sounds like the sort of things parents and school principals should be handling, not the "justice" system. Felony charges are a bit much. Police involvement is a bit much.</p><p>If it really has gotten bad, I'll bet that if the sheriff showed up with a restraining order for her and her parents to sign off on, that would have made a sufficient impression that this was a serious issue without messing anyone up for life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This really sounds like the sort of things parents and school principals should be handling , not the " justice " system .
Felony charges are a bit much .
Police involvement is a bit much.If it really has gotten bad , I 'll bet that if the sheriff showed up with a restraining order for her and her parents to sign off on , that would have made a sufficient impression that this was a serious issue without messing anyone up for life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This really sounds like the sort of things parents and school principals should be handling, not the "justice" system.
Felony charges are a bit much.
Police involvement is a bit much.If it really has gotten bad, I'll bet that if the sheriff showed up with a restraining order for her and her parents to sign off on, that would have made a sufficient impression that this was a serious issue without messing anyone up for life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772427</id>
	<title>The SHAC 7 case is a bigger deal, related</title>
	<author>HongPong</author>
	<datestamp>1255684260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyone should check this out. A group called Stop Huntington Animal Cruelty (SHAC) ran a website that supported putting the seriously nasty Huntington Life Sciences animal testing corporation out of business. They were quite successful but now the SHAC7 are getting crushed via the ridiculous Animal Enterprise Terrorism laws &amp; etc. This seems a lot worse than the Texas situation because this is about anti-corporate political websites rather than simple social networking harassment. See <a href="http://www.greenisthenewred.com/blog/shac-7-conviction-upheld-on-appeal/2307/" title="greenisthenewred.com">http://www.greenisthenewred.com/blog/shac-7-conviction-upheld-on-appeal/2307/</a> [greenisthenewred.com] . A really, really dangerous appeals court ruling came out that should scare the hell out of anyone that wants to effectively organize against corporate trolls via the Internet:</p><blockquote><div><p>The conviction of the SHAC 7&ndash;animal rights activists hit with &ldquo;terrorism&rdquo; charges for publishing a website and vocally, unapologetically supporting direct action&ndash;has been upheld by a U.S. appellate court. It is a landmark free speech ruling that lowers the threshold of what types of conduct are protected by the First Amendment, and upholds a law that is so broad that it targets civil disobedience as &ldquo;terrorism.&rdquo;</p><p>As a brief introduction: The &ldquo;SHAC 7&rdquo; of Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty ran an effective campaign that had the sole purpose of putting Huntingdon Life Sciences, a notorious animal testing company, out of business. The campaign pressured corporations to sever ties with the lab. The SHAC 7 were never accused of breaking windows or releasing animals from labs, but they supported those who did. They published a website which posted news of both legal and illegal tactics, and supported all of it. The website had also posted names and addresses of individuals connected to the corporations targeted.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....Supporting and facilitating non-violent civil disobedience is not protected speech.</p><p>As part of their campaign, SHAC supporters were emailed about &ldquo;electronic civil disobedience.&rdquo; The email and message board posts included instructions on how electronically &ldquo;sit in&rdquo; on corporate web sites through emails, faxes and phone calls.</p><p>Now, one of the benchmarks in First Amendment law is what is called the Brandenburg standard. It holds that even the most controversial and inflammatory speech is protected as long as it not likely to incite &ldquo;imminent and lawless action.&rdquo; That is a very high threshold. In this court ruling&mdash;which, to the best of my knowledge and the attorneys I have spoken with is the first of its kind&mdash;the written word can be construed as promoting, or resulting in, imminent and lawless action.</p><p>To put it more plainly: Vocally supporting civil disobedience, explaining what it involves, and encouraging/facilitating people to take part is not protected speech.</p><p>This is so important let me say it again, another way: <b>People who write about civil disobedience and encourage people to take part can be found convicted of a crime even if they do not take part in the civil disobedience.</b></p></div></blockquote><p>Another thing happening is extreme Grand Jury fishing expeditions against green activists - we had a grand jury thing go down in Minneapolis just this week. See <a href="http://tc.indymedia.org/" title="indymedia.org">http://tc.indymedia.org/</a> [indymedia.org] for the latest on this.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone should check this out .
A group called Stop Huntington Animal Cruelty ( SHAC ) ran a website that supported putting the seriously nasty Huntington Life Sciences animal testing corporation out of business .
They were quite successful but now the SHAC7 are getting crushed via the ridiculous Animal Enterprise Terrorism laws &amp; etc .
This seems a lot worse than the Texas situation because this is about anti-corporate political websites rather than simple social networking harassment .
See http : //www.greenisthenewred.com/blog/shac-7-conviction-upheld-on-appeal/2307/ [ greenisthenewred.com ] .
A really , really dangerous appeals court ruling came out that should scare the hell out of anyone that wants to effectively organize against corporate trolls via the Internet : The conviction of the SHAC 7    animal rights activists hit with    terrorism    charges for publishing a website and vocally , unapologetically supporting direct action    has been upheld by a U.S. appellate court .
It is a landmark free speech ruling that lowers the threshold of what types of conduct are protected by the First Amendment , and upholds a law that is so broad that it targets civil disobedience as    terrorism.    As a brief introduction : The    SHAC 7    of Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty ran an effective campaign that had the sole purpose of putting Huntingdon Life Sciences , a notorious animal testing company , out of business .
The campaign pressured corporations to sever ties with the lab .
The SHAC 7 were never accused of breaking windows or releasing animals from labs , but they supported those who did .
They published a website which posted news of both legal and illegal tactics , and supported all of it .
The website had also posted names and addresses of individuals connected to the corporations targeted .
....Supporting and facilitating non-violent civil disobedience is not protected speech.As part of their campaign , SHAC supporters were emailed about    electronic civil disobedience.    The email and message board posts included instructions on how electronically    sit in    on corporate web sites through emails , faxes and phone calls.Now , one of the benchmarks in First Amendment law is what is called the Brandenburg standard .
It holds that even the most controversial and inflammatory speech is protected as long as it not likely to incite    imminent and lawless action.    That is a very high threshold .
In this court ruling    which , to the best of my knowledge and the attorneys I have spoken with is the first of its kind    the written word can be construed as promoting , or resulting in , imminent and lawless action.To put it more plainly : Vocally supporting civil disobedience , explaining what it involves , and encouraging/facilitating people to take part is not protected speech.This is so important let me say it again , another way : People who write about civil disobedience and encourage people to take part can be found convicted of a crime even if they do not take part in the civil disobedience.Another thing happening is extreme Grand Jury fishing expeditions against green activists - we had a grand jury thing go down in Minneapolis just this week .
See http : //tc.indymedia.org/ [ indymedia.org ] for the latest on this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone should check this out.
A group called Stop Huntington Animal Cruelty (SHAC) ran a website that supported putting the seriously nasty Huntington Life Sciences animal testing corporation out of business.
They were quite successful but now the SHAC7 are getting crushed via the ridiculous Animal Enterprise Terrorism laws &amp; etc.
This seems a lot worse than the Texas situation because this is about anti-corporate political websites rather than simple social networking harassment.
See http://www.greenisthenewred.com/blog/shac-7-conviction-upheld-on-appeal/2307/ [greenisthenewred.com] .
A really, really dangerous appeals court ruling came out that should scare the hell out of anyone that wants to effectively organize against corporate trolls via the Internet:The conviction of the SHAC 7–animal rights activists hit with “terrorism” charges for publishing a website and vocally, unapologetically supporting direct action–has been upheld by a U.S. appellate court.
It is a landmark free speech ruling that lowers the threshold of what types of conduct are protected by the First Amendment, and upholds a law that is so broad that it targets civil disobedience as “terrorism.”As a brief introduction: The “SHAC 7” of Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty ran an effective campaign that had the sole purpose of putting Huntingdon Life Sciences, a notorious animal testing company, out of business.
The campaign pressured corporations to sever ties with the lab.
The SHAC 7 were never accused of breaking windows or releasing animals from labs, but they supported those who did.
They published a website which posted news of both legal and illegal tactics, and supported all of it.
The website had also posted names and addresses of individuals connected to the corporations targeted.
....Supporting and facilitating non-violent civil disobedience is not protected speech.As part of their campaign, SHAC supporters were emailed about “electronic civil disobedience.” The email and message board posts included instructions on how electronically “sit in” on corporate web sites through emails, faxes and phone calls.Now, one of the benchmarks in First Amendment law is what is called the Brandenburg standard.
It holds that even the most controversial and inflammatory speech is protected as long as it not likely to incite “imminent and lawless action.” That is a very high threshold.
In this court ruling—which, to the best of my knowledge and the attorneys I have spoken with is the first of its kind—the written word can be construed as promoting, or resulting in, imminent and lawless action.To put it more plainly: Vocally supporting civil disobedience, explaining what it involves, and encouraging/facilitating people to take part is not protected speech.This is so important let me say it again, another way: People who write about civil disobedience and encourage people to take part can be found convicted of a crime even if they do not take part in the civil disobedience.Another thing happening is extreme Grand Jury fishing expeditions against green activists - we had a grand jury thing go down in Minneapolis just this week.
See http://tc.indymedia.org/ [indymedia.org] for the latest on this.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773555</id>
	<title>Re:Approached from the wrong angle</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255691160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because they're kids.  That's what they do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because they 're kids .
That 's what they do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because they're kids.
That's what they do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771357</id>
	<title>Re:socialnetdef</title>
	<author>Sarten-X</author>
	<datestamp>1255721460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't matter. All messages posted here are actually sent to a "message board program" so they're exempt from the law.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't matter .
All messages posted here are actually sent to a " message board program " so they 're exempt from the law .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't matter.
All messages posted here are actually sent to a "message board program" so they're exempt from the law.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769483</id>
	<title>Re:Two to Ten Years and Up To Ten Grand</title>
	<author>notarockstar1979</author>
	<datestamp>1255712100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Screw you, goat fucker.  And I'm from Texas!<br>
&nbsp; <br>
&nbsp; Now where's my sarcasm tag.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Screw you , goat fucker .
And I 'm from Texas !
    Now where 's my sarcasm tag.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screw you, goat fucker.
And I'm from Texas!
  
  Now where's my sarcasm tag.....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769949</id>
	<title>Re:Two to Ten Years and Up To Ten Grand</title>
	<author>Nerdfest</author>
	<datestamp>1255714440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>not more than 10 years or less than 2 years</p></div><p>I'd totally take the 'less than 2 years' option. These people should think about using some parentheses or something<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>not more than 10 years or less than 2 yearsI 'd totally take the 'less than 2 years ' option .
These people should think about using some parentheses or something .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not more than 10 years or less than 2 yearsI'd totally take the 'less than 2 years' option.
These people should think about using some parentheses or something ...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769933</id>
	<title>Re:List of Texas' Third Degree Felonies</title>
	<author>DaFallus</author>
	<datestamp>1255714380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, bingo is technically a form of gambling. We all know how the government, state or federal, feels about gambling, especially when they aren't getting a cut...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , bingo is technically a form of gambling .
We all know how the government , state or federal , feels about gambling , especially when they are n't getting a cut.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, bingo is technically a form of gambling.
We all know how the government, state or federal, feels about gambling, especially when they aren't getting a cut...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768513</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768967</id>
	<title>Re:Idiocracy</title>
	<author>Rude Turnip</author>
	<datestamp>1255709520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, he likes *those* kinds of kids too?!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/s</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , he likes * those * kinds of kids too ? !
/s</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, he likes *those* kinds of kids too?!
/s</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768463</id>
	<title>Re:SHITCOCK!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255707180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"if you threaten someone in person, well that's assault."</p><p>No that's not assault.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" if you threaten someone in person , well that 's assault .
" No that 's not assault .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"if you threaten someone in person, well that's assault.
"No that's not assault.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29775315</id>
	<title>Texas it's like a whole nother Country like Iran.</title>
	<author>Criton</author>
	<datestamp>1255708500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really this is the most sicking law I've heard of yet no I'm absolutely disgusted.
If I was from Texas I would be ashamed that such a brainless law was passed in my state.

I bet the waste of carbon atoms who wrote this law was fucking a goat while he/she drafted this steaming pile of dog flop.

It's one is being pestered online it's not like being pestered in RL.
It's not that hard to to block the fuckers emails and messages or just change accounts.
If you are too dumb to do this then don't go online.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really this is the most sicking law I 've heard of yet no I 'm absolutely disgusted .
If I was from Texas I would be ashamed that such a brainless law was passed in my state .
I bet the waste of carbon atoms who wrote this law was fucking a goat while he/she drafted this steaming pile of dog flop .
It 's one is being pestered online it 's not like being pestered in RL .
It 's not that hard to to block the fuckers emails and messages or just change accounts .
If you are too dumb to do this then do n't go online .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really this is the most sicking law I've heard of yet no I'm absolutely disgusted.
If I was from Texas I would be ashamed that such a brainless law was passed in my state.
I bet the waste of carbon atoms who wrote this law was fucking a goat while he/she drafted this steaming pile of dog flop.
It's one is being pestered online it's not like being pestered in RL.
It's not that hard to to block the fuckers emails and messages or just change accounts.
If you are too dumb to do this then don't go online.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768579</id>
	<title>LOL</title>
	<author>jafiwam</author>
	<datestamp>1255707720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <b>third degree felony if the person posts one or more messages on a social networking site with the intent to harm, defraud, intimidate or threaten another person</b>

</p><p>LOL, by that standard, the entire fucking state of Texas should be arrested for the shit I see them say every day about the President. Don't mess with Texas!*

</p><p>*And by "mess" we mean to consider a democratically and validly elected official office legitimate, and especially if you know, he ain't your kind of bigot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>third degree felony if the person posts one or more messages on a social networking site with the intent to harm , defraud , intimidate or threaten another person LOL , by that standard , the entire fucking state of Texas should be arrested for the shit I see them say every day about the President .
Do n't mess with Texas !
* * And by " mess " we mean to consider a democratically and validly elected official office legitimate , and especially if you know , he ai n't your kind of bigot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> third degree felony if the person posts one or more messages on a social networking site with the intent to harm, defraud, intimidate or threaten another person

LOL, by that standard, the entire fucking state of Texas should be arrested for the shit I see them say every day about the President.
Don't mess with Texas!
*

*And by "mess" we mean to consider a democratically and validly elected official office legitimate, and especially if you know, he ain't your kind of bigot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773993</id>
	<title>Re:Let's have some fun with the law!</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1255694100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Playing the court system (unless you're part of a multimillion dollar conglomerate) is highly illegal and could result in a few lawyers losing their licenses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Playing the court system ( unless you 're part of a multimillion dollar conglomerate ) is highly illegal and could result in a few lawyers losing their licenses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Playing the court system (unless you're part of a multimillion dollar conglomerate) is highly illegal and could result in a few lawyers losing their licenses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768611</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770449</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>Alpha830RulZ</author>
	<datestamp>1255716960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And it's pretty sad that the above isn't labeled assault and battery.  We'll punish mean words, but not actual violence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And it 's pretty sad that the above is n't labeled assault and battery .
We 'll punish mean words , but not actual violence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And it's pretty sad that the above isn't labeled assault and battery.
We'll punish mean words, but not actual violence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769005</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769719</id>
	<title>Everyone, can we just please...</title>
	<author>jellybear</author>
	<datestamp>1255713300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... think about the children? Thank you.</p><p>No, I didn't say think about civil liberties - stop that. Think about the children. Keep thinking about them. No, don't think about checks and balances. Listen to me, just think about the children. There. Good man.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... think about the children ?
Thank you.No , I did n't say think about civil liberties - stop that .
Think about the children .
Keep thinking about them .
No , do n't think about checks and balances .
Listen to me , just think about the children .
There. Good man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... think about the children?
Thank you.No, I didn't say think about civil liberties - stop that.
Think about the children.
Keep thinking about them.
No, don't think about checks and balances.
Listen to me, just think about the children.
There. Good man.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768527</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768551</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>maudface</author>
	<datestamp>1255707600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having been a victim of such harassment in the past myself I agree wholeheartedly, I reported it to the police however they fairly resoundingly didn't appear to give a toss.</p><p>Given how common it is for one's name to be googled by others these days online harassment can be every bit as damaging as real life harassment, it caused me quite serious upset for some months. This wasn't merely some childish dispute but an ex looking for revenge over every medium possible, creating profiles on facebook, bebo, myspace and various other websites with the specific intent of causing me as much damage as possible.</p><p>While I'm in no means in favour of putting the internet under any form of state control this sort of activity warrants police attention and needs to be against the law. It strikes me as insane that so much focus is put on policing the internet to stop file sharers as opposed to protecting the individual.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having been a victim of such harassment in the past myself I agree wholeheartedly , I reported it to the police however they fairly resoundingly did n't appear to give a toss.Given how common it is for one 's name to be googled by others these days online harassment can be every bit as damaging as real life harassment , it caused me quite serious upset for some months .
This was n't merely some childish dispute but an ex looking for revenge over every medium possible , creating profiles on facebook , bebo , myspace and various other websites with the specific intent of causing me as much damage as possible.While I 'm in no means in favour of putting the internet under any form of state control this sort of activity warrants police attention and needs to be against the law .
It strikes me as insane that so much focus is put on policing the internet to stop file sharers as opposed to protecting the individual .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having been a victim of such harassment in the past myself I agree wholeheartedly, I reported it to the police however they fairly resoundingly didn't appear to give a toss.Given how common it is for one's name to be googled by others these days online harassment can be every bit as damaging as real life harassment, it caused me quite serious upset for some months.
This wasn't merely some childish dispute but an ex looking for revenge over every medium possible, creating profiles on facebook, bebo, myspace and various other websites with the specific intent of causing me as much damage as possible.While I'm in no means in favour of putting the internet under any form of state control this sort of activity warrants police attention and needs to be against the law.
It strikes me as insane that so much focus is put on policing the internet to stop file sharers as opposed to protecting the individual.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29775259</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255707600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Texas it's like a whole nother country.
A country like China or North Korea.

BTW nother is not a word it's slang.

Really the whole Texas government needs shot into the sun or dropped into a black hole.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Texas it 's like a whole nother country .
A country like China or North Korea .
BTW nother is not a word it 's slang .
Really the whole Texas government needs shot into the sun or dropped into a black hole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Texas it's like a whole nother country.
A country like China or North Korea.
BTW nother is not a word it's slang.
Really the whole Texas government needs shot into the sun or dropped into a black hole.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768819</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770155</id>
	<title>Re:Approached from the wrong angle</title>
	<author>NeutronCowboy</author>
	<datestamp>1255715400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That would require emotional stamina from the kids, involved parenting from the parents, toleration of lawsuit-generating situations by school officials... yeah right. I'm all for beating this particular drum until the cows come home, but I'm also not particularly confident that anything will actually happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That would require emotional stamina from the kids , involved parenting from the parents , toleration of lawsuit-generating situations by school officials... yeah right .
I 'm all for beating this particular drum until the cows come home , but I 'm also not particularly confident that anything will actually happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would require emotional stamina from the kids, involved parenting from the parents, toleration of lawsuit-generating situations by school officials... yeah right.
I'm all for beating this particular drum until the cows come home, but I'm also not particularly confident that anything will actually happen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311</id>
	<title>About time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255706340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Such stuff needs to be a felony.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Such stuff needs to be a felony .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Such stuff needs to be a felony.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771693</id>
	<title>Re:List of Texas' Third Degree Felonies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255723320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By "conducting a game of bingo without a license" of course they mean illegal gambling. Yes, that's a felony.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By " conducting a game of bingo without a license " of course they mean illegal gambling .
Yes , that 's a felony .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By "conducting a game of bingo without a license" of course they mean illegal gambling.
Yes, that's a felony.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768513</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768651</id>
	<title>Re:Idiocracy</title>
	<author>Aldenissin</author>
	<datestamp>1255708140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Obviously Texas lawmakers are unfamiliar with the legal principle "Sticks and stones make break my bones, but words will never hurt me!" If I post online that Cmdr Taco is a goat fucker, have I really "harmed" him or his reputation in any way? It's not slander unless a reasonable person would believe it to be true, and no rational person believes Taco actually dates outside his own species (unlike Captain Kirk).</p></div><p>Like OMG, you know that dude that started that weird techy website<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., or something? Yea him.. Cmdr Paco, sorry Taco. Well anyway you wouldn't believe because I know I didn't, but this guy named Anonymous Coward said that nasty mother fucker's a goat fucker. Why would anyone want to fuck a goat, ya know, that shit is just sick as fuck. Yegghhscreeeuk</p><p>Ten minutes later... Yea Aldenissin said that Cmdr Taco is a muthering fucking goat fucker, like someone had pics or something he said.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. Of course it's true! You know they wouldn't believe it without pics or someone seen it! I'm not that stupid, but that shit is just fucking crazy, what sick people do.Blleechhh</p><p>As time goes by, the words gets out, embelishes get maginfied more and more, and before you know it, wait hold on a second.. OMG I just heard that of all people fucking Cmdr Taco, that slashdot dude is a fucking goat fucker! WTF!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously Texas lawmakers are unfamiliar with the legal principle " Sticks and stones make break my bones , but words will never hurt me !
" If I post online that Cmdr Taco is a goat fucker , have I really " harmed " him or his reputation in any way ?
It 's not slander unless a reasonable person would believe it to be true , and no rational person believes Taco actually dates outside his own species ( unlike Captain Kirk ) .Like OMG , you know that dude that started that weird techy website /. , or something ?
Yea him.. Cmdr Paco , sorry Taco .
Well anyway you would n't believe because I know I did n't , but this guy named Anonymous Coward said that nasty mother fucker 's a goat fucker .
Why would anyone want to fuck a goat , ya know , that shit is just sick as fuck .
YegghhscreeeukTen minutes later... Yea Aldenissin said that Cmdr Taco is a muthering fucking goat fucker , like someone had pics or something he said .
.. Of course it 's true !
You know they would n't believe it without pics or someone seen it !
I 'm not that stupid , but that shit is just fucking crazy , what sick people do.BlleechhhAs time goes by , the words gets out , embelishes get maginfied more and more , and before you know it , wait hold on a second.. OMG I just heard that of all people fucking Cmdr Taco , that slashdot dude is a fucking goat fucker !
WTF !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously Texas lawmakers are unfamiliar with the legal principle "Sticks and stones make break my bones, but words will never hurt me!
" If I post online that Cmdr Taco is a goat fucker, have I really "harmed" him or his reputation in any way?
It's not slander unless a reasonable person would believe it to be true, and no rational person believes Taco actually dates outside his own species (unlike Captain Kirk).Like OMG, you know that dude that started that weird techy website /., or something?
Yea him.. Cmdr Paco, sorry Taco.
Well anyway you wouldn't believe because I know I didn't, but this guy named Anonymous Coward said that nasty mother fucker's a goat fucker.
Why would anyone want to fuck a goat, ya know, that shit is just sick as fuck.
YegghhscreeeukTen minutes later... Yea Aldenissin said that Cmdr Taco is a muthering fucking goat fucker, like someone had pics or something he said.
.. Of course it's true!
You know they wouldn't believe it without pics or someone seen it!
I'm not that stupid, but that shit is just fucking crazy, what sick people do.BlleechhhAs time goes by, the words gets out, embelishes get maginfied more and more, and before you know it, wait hold on a second.. OMG I just heard that of all people fucking Cmdr Taco, that slashdot dude is a fucking goat fucker!
WTF!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768813</id>
	<title>discourage using somebody else's name online</title>
	<author>rwv</author>
	<datestamp>1255708800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FTFA</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It seems the goal of the new law was to discourage using the name or persona of another person to create a Web page.</p></div><p>It seems like there is a movement to make it difficult to pretend to be somebody you're not on the internet.  I *think* this is a good thing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTFAIt seems the goal of the new law was to discourage using the name or persona of another person to create a Web page.It seems like there is a movement to make it difficult to pretend to be somebody you 're not on the internet .
I * think * this is a good thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTFAIt seems the goal of the new law was to discourage using the name or persona of another person to create a Web page.It seems like there is a movement to make it difficult to pretend to be somebody you're not on the internet.
I *think* this is a good thing.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769281</id>
	<title>Why not a misdemeanor or infraction?</title>
	<author>OrangeTide</author>
	<datestamp>1255711260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems like the perfect sort of thing to be categorized as a misdemeanor. Not something that sticks with you for the rest of your life, but something where you are given a fine and maybe community service. A felony (even third degree) seems like an excessive response to an imaginary problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems like the perfect sort of thing to be categorized as a misdemeanor .
Not something that sticks with you for the rest of your life , but something where you are given a fine and maybe community service .
A felony ( even third degree ) seems like an excessive response to an imaginary problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems like the perfect sort of thing to be categorized as a misdemeanor.
Not something that sticks with you for the rest of your life, but something where you are given a fine and maybe community service.
A felony (even third degree) seems like an excessive response to an imaginary problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359</id>
	<title>Idiocracy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255706640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously Texas lawmakers are unfamiliar with the legal principle "Sticks and stones make break my bones, but words will never hurt me!" If I post online that Cmdr Taco is a goat fucker, have I really "harmed" him or his reputation in any way? It's not slander unless a reasonable person would believe it to be true, and no rational person believes Taco actually dates outside his own species (unlike Captain Kirk).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously Texas lawmakers are unfamiliar with the legal principle " Sticks and stones make break my bones , but words will never hurt me !
" If I post online that Cmdr Taco is a goat fucker , have I really " harmed " him or his reputation in any way ?
It 's not slander unless a reasonable person would believe it to be true , and no rational person believes Taco actually dates outside his own species ( unlike Captain Kirk ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously Texas lawmakers are unfamiliar with the legal principle "Sticks and stones make break my bones, but words will never hurt me!
" If I post online that Cmdr Taco is a goat fucker, have I really "harmed" him or his reputation in any way?
It's not slander unless a reasonable person would believe it to be true, and no rational person believes Taco actually dates outside his own species (unlike Captain Kirk).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772773</id>
	<title>Re:The law's not that bad, actually</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255686240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A perfectly intelligent person can indeed say there are First Amendment issues.  The First Amendment says in part that "Congress shall make no law<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... abridging the freedom of speech".  This applies to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment.  As Hugo Black used to say, "no law means no law", and I'm not sure you can call Black a moron.  It's true that the US Supreme Court has limited the First Amendment, but it's not unreasonable to argue that the Court has gotten it wrong, and many have.  I think it's perfectly fair to argue for a stronger interpretation of the First Amendment.</p><p>Those who argue that it is a First Amendment issue vis-&#224;-vis <i>current jurisprudence</i> are incorrect, of course.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A perfectly intelligent person can indeed say there are First Amendment issues .
The First Amendment says in part that " Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech " .
This applies to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment .
As Hugo Black used to say , " no law means no law " , and I 'm not sure you can call Black a moron .
It 's true that the US Supreme Court has limited the First Amendment , but it 's not unreasonable to argue that the Court has gotten it wrong , and many have .
I think it 's perfectly fair to argue for a stronger interpretation of the First Amendment.Those who argue that it is a First Amendment issue vis-   -vis current jurisprudence are incorrect , of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A perfectly intelligent person can indeed say there are First Amendment issues.
The First Amendment says in part that "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech".
This applies to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment.
As Hugo Black used to say, "no law means no law", and I'm not sure you can call Black a moron.
It's true that the US Supreme Court has limited the First Amendment, but it's not unreasonable to argue that the Court has gotten it wrong, and many have.
I think it's perfectly fair to argue for a stronger interpretation of the First Amendment.Those who argue that it is a First Amendment issue vis-à-vis current jurisprudence are incorrect, of course.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770305</id>
	<title>Re:socialnetdef</title>
	<author>frank\_adrian314159</author>
	<datestamp>1255716180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Is Slashdot a SNS?</i> </p><p>Well, as social as they can be while they live in their Moms' basements.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is Slashdot a SNS ?
Well , as social as they can be while they live in their Moms ' basements .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is Slashdot a SNS?
Well, as social as they can be while they live in their Moms' basements.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768603</id>
	<title>Caption is misleading...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255707900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The caption here is somewhat deceptive.  I believe that the law that's being referenced is as follows:</p><p>Sec. 33.07.  ONLINE HARASSMENT.  (a)  A person commits an offense if the person uses the name or persona of another person to create a web page on or to post one or more messages on a commercial social networking site:<br>(1)  without obtaining the other person's consent; and<br>(2)  with the intent to harass, embarrass, intimidate, or threaten any person.</p><p>If that's the case it's really the misappropriation of identity that's the problem.  Without that element there's no way this survives constitutional challenge (can't turn protected speech to a felony just because it's published).  To be honest I'm so fed up with all forms of identity theft I have no sympathy for offenders.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The caption here is somewhat deceptive .
I believe that the law that 's being referenced is as follows : Sec .
33.07. ONLINE HARASSMENT .
( a ) A person commits an offense if the person uses the name or persona of another person to create a web page on or to post one or more messages on a commercial social networking site : ( 1 ) without obtaining the other person 's consent ; and ( 2 ) with the intent to harass , embarrass , intimidate , or threaten any person.If that 's the case it 's really the misappropriation of identity that 's the problem .
Without that element there 's no way this survives constitutional challenge ( ca n't turn protected speech to a felony just because it 's published ) .
To be honest I 'm so fed up with all forms of identity theft I have no sympathy for offenders .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The caption here is somewhat deceptive.
I believe that the law that's being referenced is as follows:Sec.
33.07.  ONLINE HARASSMENT.
(a)  A person commits an offense if the person uses the name or persona of another person to create a web page on or to post one or more messages on a commercial social networking site:(1)  without obtaining the other person's consent; and(2)  with the intent to harass, embarrass, intimidate, or threaten any person.If that's the case it's really the misappropriation of identity that's the problem.
Without that element there's no way this survives constitutional challenge (can't turn protected speech to a felony just because it's published).
To be honest I'm so fed up with all forms of identity theft I have no sympathy for offenders.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29774241</id>
	<title>Re:Newsflash: Teenagers are stupid and selfish</title>
	<author>Cassander</author>
	<datestamp>1255696140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, HUMANS are stupid and selfish. It really has very little to do with age.</p><p>Please don't propagate ageism.</p><p>Oh, and no matter how young they are, your kids aren't your property. They are fully sentient individuals, and are generally capable of making their own decisions and learning from the bad ones all by themselves. The sooner you realize that, the better your relationship with them will be.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , HUMANS are stupid and selfish .
It really has very little to do with age.Please do n't propagate ageism.Oh , and no matter how young they are , your kids are n't your property .
They are fully sentient individuals , and are generally capable of making their own decisions and learning from the bad ones all by themselves .
The sooner you realize that , the better your relationship with them will be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, HUMANS are stupid and selfish.
It really has very little to do with age.Please don't propagate ageism.Oh, and no matter how young they are, your kids aren't your property.
They are fully sentient individuals, and are generally capable of making their own decisions and learning from the bad ones all by themselves.
The sooner you realize that, the better your relationship with them will be.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769957</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773113</id>
	<title>Re:List of Texas' Third Degree Felonies</title>
	<author>nedlohs</author>
	<datestamp>1255688280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So don't ever post threatening messages to the a bingo forum about how you aren't letting Mary back into your bingo game.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So do n't ever post threatening messages to the a bingo forum about how you are n't letting Mary back into your bingo game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So don't ever post threatening messages to the a bingo forum about how you aren't letting Mary back into your bingo game.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768513</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773797</id>
	<title>Re:The law's not that bad, actually</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1255692840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Presumably to increase the value of a person's stated identity.  This way we can just blindly accept everything we see on the internet as true, because only a felon would lie about who they really are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Presumably to increase the value of a person 's stated identity .
This way we can just blindly accept everything we see on the internet as true , because only a felon would lie about who they really are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Presumably to increase the value of a person's stated identity.
This way we can just blindly accept everything we see on the internet as true, because only a felon would lie about who they really are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770129</id>
	<title>Re:Good Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255715340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah because children need to spend 2-10 years in prison for being douchebags...<br>If anything these laws need to target the parents of the shit heads, not jail time but toss them a $300-500 fine for raising a little twat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah because children need to spend 2-10 years in prison for being douchebags...If anything these laws need to target the parents of the shit heads , not jail time but toss them a $ 300-500 fine for raising a little twat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah because children need to spend 2-10 years in prison for being douchebags...If anything these laws need to target the parents of the shit heads, not jail time but toss them a $300-500 fine for raising a little twat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772975</id>
	<title>Re:Good Idea</title>
	<author>4D6963</author>
	<datestamp>1255687320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't that identity theft/fraud? That's very different and much more serious (not to mention defamation).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't that identity theft/fraud ?
That 's very different and much more serious ( not to mention defamation ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't that identity theft/fraud?
That's very different and much more serious (not to mention defamation).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019</id>
	<title>socialnetdef</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255709760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what is the legal definition of a social networking site anyway. Is Slashdot a SNS?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what is the legal definition of a social networking site anyway .
Is Slashdot a SNS ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what is the legal definition of a social networking site anyway.
Is Slashdot a SNS?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769005</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>GargamelSpaceman</author>
	<datestamp>1255709760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And walking up to another kid, and shoving them against the lockers, telling them "After School, On the Playground, You're Dead!" should get you in at least as much trouble.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And walking up to another kid , and shoving them against the lockers , telling them " After School , On the Playground , You 're Dead !
" should get you in at least as much trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And walking up to another kid, and shoving them against the lockers, telling them "After School, On the Playground, You're Dead!
" should get you in at least as much trouble.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770261</id>
	<title>"My intent was to mock the statute"</title>
	<author>davidwr</author>
	<datestamp>1255715880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"But your honor, my intent was not to 'harm, defraud, intimidate or threaten another person.'  My intent was to make a mockery out of H.B. 2003.  As you can see from the clear wording of the statute, mocking the statute does not violate the statute."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" But your honor , my intent was not to 'harm , defraud , intimidate or threaten another person .
' My intent was to make a mockery out of H.B .
2003. As you can see from the clear wording of the statute , mocking the statute does not violate the statute .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"But your honor, my intent was not to 'harm, defraud, intimidate or threaten another person.
'  My intent was to make a mockery out of H.B.
2003.  As you can see from the clear wording of the statute, mocking the statute does not violate the statute.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768307</id>
	<title>Your Honor!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255706340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>"I respectfully submit that the defendant is a Meanie-Head in the first degree!"<br> <br>

"My client wishes the court to know that the witness, in fact, 'started it'."</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I respectfully submit that the defendant is a Meanie-Head in the first degree !
" " My client wishes the court to know that the witness , in fact , 'started it' .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I respectfully submit that the defendant is a Meanie-Head in the first degree!
" 

"My client wishes the court to know that the witness, in fact, 'started it'.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770349</id>
	<title>Re:Two to Ten Years and Up To Ten Grand</title>
	<author>hemp</author>
	<datestamp>1255716420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>16 year olds are tried as adults in Texas and can even be executed.  Records are not expunged at age 18.</p><p>You must be from one of that them liberal states.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>16 year olds are tried as adults in Texas and can even be executed .
Records are not expunged at age 18.You must be from one of that them liberal states .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>16 year olds are tried as adults in Texas and can even be executed.
Records are not expunged at age 18.You must be from one of that them liberal states.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768787</id>
	<title>Re:LOL</title>
	<author>e2d2</author>
	<datestamp>1255708680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You read what everyone in the state of Texas says everyday? Where is this publication and how do I subscribe?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You read what everyone in the state of Texas says everyday ?
Where is this publication and how do I subscribe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You read what everyone in the state of Texas says everyday?
Where is this publication and how do I subscribe?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768579</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771735</id>
	<title>Re:Good Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255723560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Educating people about how not everything on the internet is true would be an even better idea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Educating people about how not everything on the internet is true would be an even better idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Educating people about how not everything on the internet is true would be an even better idea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769187</id>
	<title>Re:SHITCOCK!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255710660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A threat is not an attack</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A threat is not an attack</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A threat is not an attack</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768735</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771897</id>
	<title>Re:SHITCOCK!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255724460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While I agree for the most part, I do not agree that threatening someone = assault.  It's not assault until blows are exchanged.  Even then, I would not consider two kids fighting in the school yard "assault."</p><p>The reality is that kids disagree, and call each other names, and "threaten" each other, and fight.  I think too often we expect our children to behave like adults in adult society, when they are not.  Name calling is not libel and slander (it's just name calling, and the kids will have to learn to deal with it).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While I agree for the most part , I do not agree that threatening someone = assault .
It 's not assault until blows are exchanged .
Even then , I would not consider two kids fighting in the school yard " assault .
" The reality is that kids disagree , and call each other names , and " threaten " each other , and fight .
I think too often we expect our children to behave like adults in adult society , when they are not .
Name calling is not libel and slander ( it 's just name calling , and the kids will have to learn to deal with it ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I agree for the most part, I do not agree that threatening someone = assault.
It's not assault until blows are exchanged.
Even then, I would not consider two kids fighting in the school yard "assault.
"The reality is that kids disagree, and call each other names, and "threaten" each other, and fight.
I think too often we expect our children to behave like adults in adult society, when they are not.
Name calling is not libel and slander (it's just name calling, and the kids will have to learn to deal with it).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29779621</id>
	<title>Re:Good Idea</title>
	<author>TheTyrannyOfForcedRe</author>
	<datestamp>1255771080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Schools should not be punishing kids for things done outside of school.  End of story.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Schools should not be punishing kids for things done outside of school .
End of story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Schools should not be punishing kids for things done outside of school.
End of story.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770425</id>
	<title>Re:SHITCOCK!</title>
	<author>Fortunato\_NC</author>
	<datestamp>1255716900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>People need to learn that being a SHITCOCK Internet Fuckwad is unacceptable. People also need to grow thicker skin, but when it truly hurts someone it's time to stop.</p></div></blockquote><p>Perhaps you could start us on the return trip to civility by eliminating homophobic nonsense like "SHITCOCK" from your own vocabulary.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>People need to learn that being a SHITCOCK Internet Fuckwad is unacceptable .
People also need to grow thicker skin , but when it truly hurts someone it 's time to stop.Perhaps you could start us on the return trip to civility by eliminating homophobic nonsense like " SHITCOCK " from your own vocabulary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People need to learn that being a SHITCOCK Internet Fuckwad is unacceptable.
People also need to grow thicker skin, but when it truly hurts someone it's time to stop.Perhaps you could start us on the return trip to civility by eliminating homophobic nonsense like "SHITCOCK" from your own vocabulary.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768657</id>
	<title>Re:Idiocracy</title>
	<author>santiagodraco</author>
	<datestamp>1255708140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you know the person and if the persons real name is used, then threats of bodily hard, whether in person or via a chat room/facebook or whatever, should be taken very seriously.   There should be no difference in the law.</p><p>When all parties are anonymous then it's a different story, obviously.  I'm assuming that is not the case here.</p><p>I still think Miss Whatshername (the mother that threatened the girl on behalf of her son online) and caused the girls suicide (or contributed to it) should have her ass in jail right now finding out what it's like to be "under threat".</p><p>Goat fuckers aside.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you know the person and if the persons real name is used , then threats of bodily hard , whether in person or via a chat room/facebook or whatever , should be taken very seriously .
There should be no difference in the law.When all parties are anonymous then it 's a different story , obviously .
I 'm assuming that is not the case here.I still think Miss Whatshername ( the mother that threatened the girl on behalf of her son online ) and caused the girls suicide ( or contributed to it ) should have her ass in jail right now finding out what it 's like to be " under threat " .Goat fuckers aside .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you know the person and if the persons real name is used, then threats of bodily hard, whether in person or via a chat room/facebook or whatever, should be taken very seriously.
There should be no difference in the law.When all parties are anonymous then it's a different story, obviously.
I'm assuming that is not the case here.I still think Miss Whatshername (the mother that threatened the girl on behalf of her son online) and caused the girls suicide (or contributed to it) should have her ass in jail right now finding out what it's like to be "under threat".Goat fuckers aside.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768819</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255708800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am going to kill all of you people that thinks this is a felony. Good thing I don't live in Texas!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am going to kill all of you people that thinks this is a felony .
Good thing I do n't live in Texas !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am going to kill all of you people that thinks this is a felony.
Good thing I don't live in Texas!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768643</id>
	<title>Re:Idiocracy-Goat Love</title>
	<author>gpronger</author>
	<datestamp>1255708080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I happen to know that the Commander's relationship with farm animals is a completely enlightened and fulfilling one for all parties involved. It's narrowed minded individuals like yourself which sullies  these otherwise warm and positive relationships. Kirk on the other-hand was clearly a sexist (as was the writers which always wrote into the universe aliens which had all the necessary parts to get him hot and bothered).<br> <br>

However, unlike your comment and mine, its easy to differentiate "reality". What has happened on in these cases that they are attempting to address is that the attack on the individual is such that a peer does believe the tripe. At the age we're talking about, both males and females, many are particularly vulnerable. Their friends and what their peers think of them is massively important. <br> <br>

whether we can legislate politeness is another matter. I don't believe that teens are any more villainous than before, its more that the internet allows a wider audience to attack while the anonymity makes it more difficult to defend oneself (though I would at the same time believe that net anonymity is massively important, though I'll post this, non-anonymously).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I happen to know that the Commander 's relationship with farm animals is a completely enlightened and fulfilling one for all parties involved .
It 's narrowed minded individuals like yourself which sullies these otherwise warm and positive relationships .
Kirk on the other-hand was clearly a sexist ( as was the writers which always wrote into the universe aliens which had all the necessary parts to get him hot and bothered ) .
However , unlike your comment and mine , its easy to differentiate " reality " .
What has happened on in these cases that they are attempting to address is that the attack on the individual is such that a peer does believe the tripe .
At the age we 're talking about , both males and females , many are particularly vulnerable .
Their friends and what their peers think of them is massively important .
whether we can legislate politeness is another matter .
I do n't believe that teens are any more villainous than before , its more that the internet allows a wider audience to attack while the anonymity makes it more difficult to defend oneself ( though I would at the same time believe that net anonymity is massively important , though I 'll post this , non-anonymously ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I happen to know that the Commander's relationship with farm animals is a completely enlightened and fulfilling one for all parties involved.
It's narrowed minded individuals like yourself which sullies  these otherwise warm and positive relationships.
Kirk on the other-hand was clearly a sexist (as was the writers which always wrote into the universe aliens which had all the necessary parts to get him hot and bothered).
However, unlike your comment and mine, its easy to differentiate "reality".
What has happened on in these cases that they are attempting to address is that the attack on the individual is such that a peer does believe the tripe.
At the age we're talking about, both males and females, many are particularly vulnerable.
Their friends and what their peers think of them is massively important.
whether we can legislate politeness is another matter.
I don't believe that teens are any more villainous than before, its more that the internet allows a wider audience to attack while the anonymity makes it more difficult to defend oneself (though I would at the same time believe that net anonymity is massively important, though I'll post this, non-anonymously).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769955</id>
	<title>Re:socialnetdef</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255714440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm glad I'm not in texas, so I can call you a bleeding cuntbag piece of dogshit asshole bated cumstain</p><p>p.s. I hate you and your post sucks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm glad I 'm not in texas , so I can call you a bleeding cuntbag piece of dogshit asshole bated cumstainp.s .
I hate you and your post sucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm glad I'm not in texas, so I can call you a bleeding cuntbag piece of dogshit asshole bated cumstainp.s.
I hate you and your post sucks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768829</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>ChefInnocent</author>
	<datestamp>1255708860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do you believe this girl deserves a minimum stint of 2 years in jail with a maximum of 10 plus a fine up to $10,000?  We don't know the details, but regardless, the State of Texas will destroy her life for something she did when she was 16.  Our country doesn't rehabilitate people, she won't end up with simple counseling, she will end up in prison for what amounts to stupid shit.  The brain is not fully developed by 16, hormones are  definitely unstable at 16, and yet she has been charged with a felony for saying something stupid.<br> <br>
By the time her "victim" is in her mid-20's she will likely think nothing of it, but the "assailant" could still be in prison.  And because of our wonderful penal system, she will likely be black marked for life and moving in and out of the criminal system.  Why this couldn't be stopped at a much lower level, I don't know, but by using this method instead of others our "victim" and "assailant" will very much reverse roles.<br> <br>
Hopefully, she can get a good judge who will she the long term effects of charging her as a felon and reverse course, but I don't have that sort of faith in humanity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you believe this girl deserves a minimum stint of 2 years in jail with a maximum of 10 plus a fine up to $ 10,000 ?
We do n't know the details , but regardless , the State of Texas will destroy her life for something she did when she was 16 .
Our country does n't rehabilitate people , she wo n't end up with simple counseling , she will end up in prison for what amounts to stupid shit .
The brain is not fully developed by 16 , hormones are definitely unstable at 16 , and yet she has been charged with a felony for saying something stupid .
By the time her " victim " is in her mid-20 's she will likely think nothing of it , but the " assailant " could still be in prison .
And because of our wonderful penal system , she will likely be black marked for life and moving in and out of the criminal system .
Why this could n't be stopped at a much lower level , I do n't know , but by using this method instead of others our " victim " and " assailant " will very much reverse roles .
Hopefully , she can get a good judge who will she the long term effects of charging her as a felon and reverse course , but I do n't have that sort of faith in humanity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you believe this girl deserves a minimum stint of 2 years in jail with a maximum of 10 plus a fine up to $10,000?
We don't know the details, but regardless, the State of Texas will destroy her life for something she did when she was 16.
Our country doesn't rehabilitate people, she won't end up with simple counseling, she will end up in prison for what amounts to stupid shit.
The brain is not fully developed by 16, hormones are  definitely unstable at 16, and yet she has been charged with a felony for saying something stupid.
By the time her "victim" is in her mid-20's she will likely think nothing of it, but the "assailant" could still be in prison.
And because of our wonderful penal system, she will likely be black marked for life and moving in and out of the criminal system.
Why this couldn't be stopped at a much lower level, I don't know, but by using this method instead of others our "victim" and "assailant" will very much reverse roles.
Hopefully, she can get a good judge who will she the long term effects of charging her as a felon and reverse course, but I don't have that sort of faith in humanity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771307</id>
	<title>Physical Abuse?</title>
	<author>tarlss</author>
	<datestamp>1255721280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kids are getting shot and fighting in parking lots. Physical assault happens a lot more in school, with kids getting punched/kicked/pushed all the time in the hallways. If harassing online deserves jail time, why isn't locking a nerd in a locker a federal offense? You're doing a lot more psychological damage/etc.

Kids act like vicious little bastards towards each other because they don't get the same protections adults do. If a 40 year old grabs a 80 year old man and shoves his head into a toilet and flushes, that's serious assault and jail time. If 12 year old does it to a 10 year old, most school teachers just look the other way.

What I don't think is productive is this new 'cyber bullying' bull. That's just unfairly targeting computer bullying just because we don't understand it. There needs to be a universal effort to stop harassment of all kinds among children.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kids are getting shot and fighting in parking lots .
Physical assault happens a lot more in school , with kids getting punched/kicked/pushed all the time in the hallways .
If harassing online deserves jail time , why is n't locking a nerd in a locker a federal offense ?
You 're doing a lot more psychological damage/etc .
Kids act like vicious little bastards towards each other because they do n't get the same protections adults do .
If a 40 year old grabs a 80 year old man and shoves his head into a toilet and flushes , that 's serious assault and jail time .
If 12 year old does it to a 10 year old , most school teachers just look the other way .
What I do n't think is productive is this new 'cyber bullying ' bull .
That 's just unfairly targeting computer bullying just because we do n't understand it .
There needs to be a universal effort to stop harassment of all kinds among children .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kids are getting shot and fighting in parking lots.
Physical assault happens a lot more in school, with kids getting punched/kicked/pushed all the time in the hallways.
If harassing online deserves jail time, why isn't locking a nerd in a locker a federal offense?
You're doing a lot more psychological damage/etc.
Kids act like vicious little bastards towards each other because they don't get the same protections adults do.
If a 40 year old grabs a 80 year old man and shoves his head into a toilet and flushes, that's serious assault and jail time.
If 12 year old does it to a 10 year old, most school teachers just look the other way.
What I don't think is productive is this new 'cyber bullying' bull.
That's just unfairly targeting computer bullying just because we don't understand it.
There needs to be a universal effort to stop harassment of all kinds among children.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768589</id>
	<title>Hell it's Texas</title>
	<author>Kushy</author>
	<datestamp>1255707780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She should be on death row by Monday morning.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She should be on death row by Monday morning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She should be on death row by Monday morning.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768483</id>
	<title>Finally</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255707300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is about fucking time that people start getting punished for this. It has been far to long where people could harass you online, and go free.</p><p>I'm sure most of you have heard about that gal committing suicide because of the online bullying.</p><p>Finally justice will be handed out to individuals like that.</p><p>-BigL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is about fucking time that people start getting punished for this .
It has been far to long where people could harass you online , and go free.I 'm sure most of you have heard about that gal committing suicide because of the online bullying.Finally justice will be handed out to individuals like that.-BigL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is about fucking time that people start getting punished for this.
It has been far to long where people could harass you online, and go free.I'm sure most of you have heard about that gal committing suicide because of the online bullying.Finally justice will be handed out to individuals like that.-BigL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768505</id>
	<title>Hmmm..</title>
	<author>windex82</author>
	<datestamp>1255707360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not so sure laws needed to be made for something that amounts to name calling.  If the name calling extends to harassment we already have laws in place.</p><p>The only fix to this problem is proper parrenting and teaching kids how to respect and really communicate with one another.  Even removing anonymity doesn't fix this problem (and I am completely against any attempt to remove it).  I am aware that Anecdotes aren't evidence but I've been "bullied" online (if you want to call it that) by girls who went to the same school as I, they were well aware I knew who they were and they knew who I was.  How did I respond?  I walked up to them the next day and kindly asked them to continue calling me names now that we are face to face.  They just slithered away muttering half apologies and never messaged me again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not so sure laws needed to be made for something that amounts to name calling .
If the name calling extends to harassment we already have laws in place.The only fix to this problem is proper parrenting and teaching kids how to respect and really communicate with one another .
Even removing anonymity does n't fix this problem ( and I am completely against any attempt to remove it ) .
I am aware that Anecdotes are n't evidence but I 've been " bullied " online ( if you want to call it that ) by girls who went to the same school as I , they were well aware I knew who they were and they knew who I was .
How did I respond ?
I walked up to them the next day and kindly asked them to continue calling me names now that we are face to face .
They just slithered away muttering half apologies and never messaged me again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not so sure laws needed to be made for something that amounts to name calling.
If the name calling extends to harassment we already have laws in place.The only fix to this problem is proper parrenting and teaching kids how to respect and really communicate with one another.
Even removing anonymity doesn't fix this problem (and I am completely against any attempt to remove it).
I am aware that Anecdotes aren't evidence but I've been "bullied" online (if you want to call it that) by girls who went to the same school as I, they were well aware I knew who they were and they knew who I was.
How did I respond?
I walked up to them the next day and kindly asked them to continue calling me names now that we are face to face.
They just slithered away muttering half apologies and never messaged me again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770309</id>
	<title>Re:The law's not that bad, actually</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1255716180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So... slander and libel are somehow twice as bad online as they are otherwise? And we need a special law for this? Why?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So... slander and libel are somehow twice as bad online as they are otherwise ?
And we need a special law for this ?
Why ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So... slander and libel are somehow twice as bad online as they are otherwise?
And we need a special law for this?
Why?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769795</id>
	<title>You people are a bunch of schizophrenic morons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255713720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you want the government micromanaging your life, or don't you?  Please make up your friggin' minds.  You fickle mush heads seem to sway with the breeze...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you want the government micromanaging your life , or do n't you ?
Please make up your friggin ' minds .
You fickle mush heads seem to sway with the breeze.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you want the government micromanaging your life, or don't you?
Please make up your friggin' minds.
You fickle mush heads seem to sway with the breeze...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771283</id>
	<title>Re:List of Texas' Third Degree Felonies</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1255721100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh man, that's a triple-whammy on my illegal Arson Assault Bingo parlor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh man , that 's a triple-whammy on my illegal Arson Assault Bingo parlor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh man, that's a triple-whammy on my illegal Arson Assault Bingo parlor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768513</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769191</id>
	<title>Evidence for an opinion---wtf?</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1255710660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why does this need to be a felony? Support your claim with evidence.</p></div><p>I believe your parent was making a statement of opinion.</p><p>You want them to prove their opinion is correct?  What does it even mean for an opinion to be correct?</p><p>One can reasonably ask for reasons why people hold the opinions they hold, or whether they have any evidence for what the consequence of enacting a particular law might be (that <em>is</em> a factual claim), but I think you're using dirty debating tactics if you ask people to prove their opinions.</p><p>(you might ask people to prove that they actually hold the opinions they claim to hold, but that's a different thing---basically lie detection.)</p><p>Your parent is asserting his opinion very strongly, though, as if it's an absolute truth.  Questioning anything claimed to be an absolute truth, backed up only by the strength of the assertion, is a good thing.  But ask the right question---they make for a better debate and you tend to learn more* about the people you're conversing with<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>(*no, I don't have any evidence for that, and yes, it's a factual claim.  I, like fate, am not without a sense of irony.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does this need to be a felony ?
Support your claim with evidence.I believe your parent was making a statement of opinion.You want them to prove their opinion is correct ?
What does it even mean for an opinion to be correct ? One can reasonably ask for reasons why people hold the opinions they hold , or whether they have any evidence for what the consequence of enacting a particular law might be ( that is a factual claim ) , but I think you 're using dirty debating tactics if you ask people to prove their opinions .
( you might ask people to prove that they actually hold the opinions they claim to hold , but that 's a different thing---basically lie detection .
) Your parent is asserting his opinion very strongly , though , as if it 's an absolute truth .
Questioning anything claimed to be an absolute truth , backed up only by the strength of the assertion , is a good thing .
But ask the right question---they make for a better debate and you tend to learn more * about the people you 're conversing with ; - ) ( * no , I do n't have any evidence for that , and yes , it 's a factual claim .
I , like fate , am not without a sense of irony .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does this need to be a felony?
Support your claim with evidence.I believe your parent was making a statement of opinion.You want them to prove their opinion is correct?
What does it even mean for an opinion to be correct?One can reasonably ask for reasons why people hold the opinions they hold, or whether they have any evidence for what the consequence of enacting a particular law might be (that is a factual claim), but I think you're using dirty debating tactics if you ask people to prove their opinions.
(you might ask people to prove that they actually hold the opinions they claim to hold, but that's a different thing---basically lie detection.
)Your parent is asserting his opinion very strongly, though, as if it's an absolute truth.
Questioning anything claimed to be an absolute truth, backed up only by the strength of the assertion, is a good thing.
But ask the right question---they make for a better debate and you tend to learn more* about the people you're conversing with ;-)(*no, I don't have any evidence for that, and yes, it's a factual claim.
I, like fate, am not without a sense of irony.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768527</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770545</id>
	<title>Re:Approached from the wrong angle</title>
	<author>shambalagoon</author>
	<datestamp>1255717440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While I agree with the main point of your post, your use of the term "mistakes" stuck me as bizarre.<br>
<br>
A premeditated and months-long online smear campaign including a defamatory web site with the victim's name is not an innocent "mistake".</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I agree with the main point of your post , your use of the term " mistakes " stuck me as bizarre .
A premeditated and months-long online smear campaign including a defamatory web site with the victim 's name is not an innocent " mistake " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I agree with the main point of your post, your use of the term "mistakes" stuck me as bizarre.
A premeditated and months-long online smear campaign including a defamatory web site with the victim's name is not an innocent "mistake".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770761</id>
	<title>Re:Evidence for an opinion---wtf?</title>
	<author>qortra</author>
	<datestamp>1255718400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I stand corrected sir.  "Evidence" was not the correct thing for which to ask.  It was an honest mistake, and I had no intention of employing a dirty debating tactic.<p><div class="quote"><p>you tend to learn more* about the people you're conversing with</p></div><p>In this context, I would prefer not to.  In truth, I have no interest in personal anecdotal reasoning for peoples' opinions.  I would prefer to hear cogent reasoning based on sound moral theory.  Reasoning of the form, "I like [x] governmental policy because it benefits me" bores me deeply.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I stand corrected sir .
" Evidence " was not the correct thing for which to ask .
It was an honest mistake , and I had no intention of employing a dirty debating tactic.you tend to learn more * about the people you 're conversing withIn this context , I would prefer not to .
In truth , I have no interest in personal anecdotal reasoning for peoples ' opinions .
I would prefer to hear cogent reasoning based on sound moral theory .
Reasoning of the form , " I like [ x ] governmental policy because it benefits me " bores me deeply .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I stand corrected sir.
"Evidence" was not the correct thing for which to ask.
It was an honest mistake, and I had no intention of employing a dirty debating tactic.you tend to learn more* about the people you're conversing withIn this context, I would prefer not to.
In truth, I have no interest in personal anecdotal reasoning for peoples' opinions.
I would prefer to hear cogent reasoning based on sound moral theory.
Reasoning of the form, "I like [x] governmental policy because it benefits me" bores me deeply.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768423</id>
	<title>Forget trolling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255707000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's the new hot sport: intimidation bait!</p><p>Step 1: Write something so stupid and of bad taste that some people will just have to reply to intimidate or threaten you.<br>Step 2: See a picture of them in handcuffs in tomorrow's newspapers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's the new hot sport : intimidation bait ! Step 1 : Write something so stupid and of bad taste that some people will just have to reply to intimidate or threaten you.Step 2 : See a picture of them in handcuffs in tomorrow 's newspapers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's the new hot sport: intimidation bait!Step 1: Write something so stupid and of bad taste that some people will just have to reply to intimidate or threaten you.Step 2: See a picture of them in handcuffs in tomorrow's newspapers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770693</id>
	<title>But, but, but...</title>
	<author>billybob\_jcv</author>
	<datestamp>1255718100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...Judge, he needed killing, and my family is involved!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...Judge , he needed killing , and my family is involved !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Judge, he needed killing, and my family is involved!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773023</id>
	<title>Re:Approached from the wrong angle</title>
	<author>4D6963</author>
	<datestamp>1255687620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh give me a break, people like you just love to pretend like any crime committed by minors can be completely averted with "better parenting" and that type of crap. It can't, because children are no better than adults, that's why there are laws.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh give me a break , people like you just love to pretend like any crime committed by minors can be completely averted with " better parenting " and that type of crap .
It ca n't , because children are no better than adults , that 's why there are laws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh give me a break, people like you just love to pretend like any crime committed by minors can be completely averted with "better parenting" and that type of crap.
It can't, because children are no better than adults, that's why there are laws.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768671</id>
	<title>Approached from the wrong angle</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255708260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>We should really look at the emotional/psychological reasons that these kids are attacking each other and come up with strategies for treating those issues rather than arresting children for mistakes they make online.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We should really look at the emotional/psychological reasons that these kids are attacking each other and come up with strategies for treating those issues rather than arresting children for mistakes they make online .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We should really look at the emotional/psychological reasons that these kids are attacking each other and come up with strategies for treating those issues rather than arresting children for mistakes they make online.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768681</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>BlackSnake112</author>
	<datestamp>1255708260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Such stuff needs to be a felony.</p></div><p>If that is so, then a whole lot of slashdot posters are going to jail.</p><p>Anyone remember the old saying "sticks and stone will break my bones, but words will never hurt me" It went something like that. The point is words, unless written into laws are only words. As long as no one acts on those words, do not get worked up over it. Also laws like this are to far reaching. If they stopped at harm and defrauding I would have agreed with the law. Those are things that can be proved easily. The others are harder to prove. There is a huge difference between saying words to threaten someone and pointing a gun in their face. Both are threats or methods of intimidation one is clearly more forceful.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Such stuff needs to be a felony.If that is so , then a whole lot of slashdot posters are going to jail.Anyone remember the old saying " sticks and stone will break my bones , but words will never hurt me " It went something like that .
The point is words , unless written into laws are only words .
As long as no one acts on those words , do not get worked up over it .
Also laws like this are to far reaching .
If they stopped at harm and defrauding I would have agreed with the law .
Those are things that can be proved easily .
The others are harder to prove .
There is a huge difference between saying words to threaten someone and pointing a gun in their face .
Both are threats or methods of intimidation one is clearly more forceful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Such stuff needs to be a felony.If that is so, then a whole lot of slashdot posters are going to jail.Anyone remember the old saying "sticks and stone will break my bones, but words will never hurt me" It went something like that.
The point is words, unless written into laws are only words.
As long as no one acts on those words, do not get worked up over it.
Also laws like this are to far reaching.
If they stopped at harm and defrauding I would have agreed with the law.
Those are things that can be proved easily.
The others are harder to prove.
There is a huge difference between saying words to threaten someone and pointing a gun in their face.
Both are threats or methods of intimidation one is clearly more forceful.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769381</id>
	<title>Look Busy Work</title>
	<author>Demonantis</author>
	<datestamp>1255711680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its more political then fair. If you have a tough sentence then you get headlines and people think your laws are making a difference. The tough sentence is argued as a deterrence for others which most people will accept. It "reduces the number of court cases"(not really in practice) so it is beneficial to the already over taxed court system. Removes that argument when passing such a broad and aggressive law, like this one. That is how it happens. What the parents should have done is sit them down and talk it out. The courts is not the way to go. If that failed they could have easily gotten a peace treaty(Canadian Law, not sure if there is an analog in the States). It is like a reduced restraining order which makes sense. Making this law really superfluous.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its more political then fair .
If you have a tough sentence then you get headlines and people think your laws are making a difference .
The tough sentence is argued as a deterrence for others which most people will accept .
It " reduces the number of court cases " ( not really in practice ) so it is beneficial to the already over taxed court system .
Removes that argument when passing such a broad and aggressive law , like this one .
That is how it happens .
What the parents should have done is sit them down and talk it out .
The courts is not the way to go .
If that failed they could have easily gotten a peace treaty ( Canadian Law , not sure if there is an analog in the States ) .
It is like a reduced restraining order which makes sense .
Making this law really superfluous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its more political then fair.
If you have a tough sentence then you get headlines and people think your laws are making a difference.
The tough sentence is argued as a deterrence for others which most people will accept.
It "reduces the number of court cases"(not really in practice) so it is beneficial to the already over taxed court system.
Removes that argument when passing such a broad and aggressive law, like this one.
That is how it happens.
What the parents should have done is sit them down and talk it out.
The courts is not the way to go.
If that failed they could have easily gotten a peace treaty(Canadian Law, not sure if there is an analog in the States).
It is like a reduced restraining order which makes sense.
Making this law really superfluous.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771783</id>
	<title>You read the article?  You read the LAW!?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255723920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heretic!  Unclean!  You are not of the body!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heretic !
Unclean ! You are not of the body !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heretic!
Unclean!  You are not of the body!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769153</id>
	<title>Re:Hard cases...</title>
	<author>Absolut187</author>
	<datestamp>1255710480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly.  Some girl kills herself after being harrassed over a particular medium...<br>Now its illegal to say anything on the internet with "intent to harm" which presumably includes intent to hurt someone's feelings.</p><p>FTFA: "Some people expect legal challenges to the constitutionality of the new internet law."<br>This law will almost certainly be held unconstituional.<br>The law is just ridiculously vague.  You're trying to make a FELONY to hurt someone's feelings?<br>Are you kidding me?</p><p>See:<br><a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/Constitution/amendment14/15.html" title="findlaw.com">http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/Constitution/amendment14/15.html</a> [findlaw.com]<br>Subheading: "Clarity in Criminal Statutes: The Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine"<br>"Generally, a vague statute that regulates in the area of First Amendment guarantees will be pronounced wholly void"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
Some girl kills herself after being harrassed over a particular medium...Now its illegal to say anything on the internet with " intent to harm " which presumably includes intent to hurt someone 's feelings.FTFA : " Some people expect legal challenges to the constitutionality of the new internet law .
" This law will almost certainly be held unconstituional.The law is just ridiculously vague .
You 're trying to make a FELONY to hurt someone 's feelings ? Are you kidding me ? See : http : //caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/Constitution/amendment14/15.html [ findlaw.com ] Subheading : " Clarity in Criminal Statutes : The Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine " " Generally , a vague statute that regulates in the area of First Amendment guarantees will be pronounced wholly void "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
Some girl kills herself after being harrassed over a particular medium...Now its illegal to say anything on the internet with "intent to harm" which presumably includes intent to hurt someone's feelings.FTFA: "Some people expect legal challenges to the constitutionality of the new internet law.
"This law will almost certainly be held unconstituional.The law is just ridiculously vague.
You're trying to make a FELONY to hurt someone's feelings?Are you kidding me?See:http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/Constitution/amendment14/15.html [findlaw.com]Subheading: "Clarity in Criminal Statutes: The Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine""Generally, a vague statute that regulates in the area of First Amendment guarantees will be pronounced wholly void"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768377</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769471</id>
	<title>Re:socialnetdef</title>
	<author>meyekul</author>
	<datestamp>1255712040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Considering I doubt that anyone here would actually want to meet or socialize with anyone else here, I'd say no.  Slashdot is more like a big tree that we all like to piss on than a social networking site.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering I doubt that anyone here would actually want to meet or socialize with anyone else here , I 'd say no .
Slashdot is more like a big tree that we all like to piss on than a social networking site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering I doubt that anyone here would actually want to meet or socialize with anyone else here, I'd say no.
Slashdot is more like a big tree that we all like to piss on than a social networking site.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769935</id>
	<title>Re:Idiocracy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255714380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well he hasn't denied it, and I have a photoshopped^H^H^H^H^H^H^H picture of him and a goat.</p><p>Besides, I've convinced several of my friends that he is and we're telling everyone, repeatedly.</p><p>It's been repeated so often by so many people that it must be true. And since some of those people are hysterical, they must be traumatized by the sight, so it must be even more true since emotions prove the truth of a claim.</p><p>A compliant has been made to PETA by me^H^H^H^H^H^H^H. So there is an official complaint against him.</p><p>---</p><p>More seriously, words are important. What would happen if you moved to town a year ago and I told everyone that the reason you moved here is because you wanted to start fresh after being acquitted of molesting 10 children on a technicality like O J Simpson. In this case, the cops got evidence without a warrant. You escaped judgment from the law, but all the people around you knew you were guilty.</p><p>What would happen then? Most people won't be able to confirm or refute the story. Most people would disbelieve the story, but keep you away from their children (at least unsupervised) and keep watch over you to check if you have any sexual deviances. Be careful when hugging a child, it may be taken the wrong way. A few nuts will believe the story outright and threaten your life.</p><p>If you don't believe this, you don't understand human nature.</p><p>Now I don't agree with the law. There is no need for an "online harassment law" since we have a perfectly good slander law. If its not covered under slander, then this shouldn't be covered either.</p><p>IMO, this country has too many redundant laws, which end up being inconsistent. How on earth is a citizen supposed to obey the law if even lawyers, after several years of study, don't know them all? And you can be sure that Police officers don't have the time to learn all the nuances of all laws, let alone all laws and all the laws that have been dropped.</p><p>Unfortunately that's the problem with democracy. If the country has all the laws it needs, politicians are redundant, so they need to show they are busy by creating new laws. What this country needs is to split the senate congress and senate in two. One set of politicians can thus be focused on making new laws. Another set of politicians can be focused on repealing old redundant laws or simplifying old laws. The two would balance each other out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well he has n't denied it , and I have a photoshopped ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H picture of him and a goat.Besides , I 've convinced several of my friends that he is and we 're telling everyone , repeatedly.It 's been repeated so often by so many people that it must be true .
And since some of those people are hysterical , they must be traumatized by the sight , so it must be even more true since emotions prove the truth of a claim.A compliant has been made to PETA by me ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H .
So there is an official complaint against him.---More seriously , words are important .
What would happen if you moved to town a year ago and I told everyone that the reason you moved here is because you wanted to start fresh after being acquitted of molesting 10 children on a technicality like O J Simpson .
In this case , the cops got evidence without a warrant .
You escaped judgment from the law , but all the people around you knew you were guilty.What would happen then ?
Most people wo n't be able to confirm or refute the story .
Most people would disbelieve the story , but keep you away from their children ( at least unsupervised ) and keep watch over you to check if you have any sexual deviances .
Be careful when hugging a child , it may be taken the wrong way .
A few nuts will believe the story outright and threaten your life.If you do n't believe this , you do n't understand human nature.Now I do n't agree with the law .
There is no need for an " online harassment law " since we have a perfectly good slander law .
If its not covered under slander , then this should n't be covered either.IMO , this country has too many redundant laws , which end up being inconsistent .
How on earth is a citizen supposed to obey the law if even lawyers , after several years of study , do n't know them all ?
And you can be sure that Police officers do n't have the time to learn all the nuances of all laws , let alone all laws and all the laws that have been dropped.Unfortunately that 's the problem with democracy .
If the country has all the laws it needs , politicians are redundant , so they need to show they are busy by creating new laws .
What this country needs is to split the senate congress and senate in two .
One set of politicians can thus be focused on making new laws .
Another set of politicians can be focused on repealing old redundant laws or simplifying old laws .
The two would balance each other out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well he hasn't denied it, and I have a photoshopped^H^H^H^H^H^H^H picture of him and a goat.Besides, I've convinced several of my friends that he is and we're telling everyone, repeatedly.It's been repeated so often by so many people that it must be true.
And since some of those people are hysterical, they must be traumatized by the sight, so it must be even more true since emotions prove the truth of a claim.A compliant has been made to PETA by me^H^H^H^H^H^H^H.
So there is an official complaint against him.---More seriously, words are important.
What would happen if you moved to town a year ago and I told everyone that the reason you moved here is because you wanted to start fresh after being acquitted of molesting 10 children on a technicality like O J Simpson.
In this case, the cops got evidence without a warrant.
You escaped judgment from the law, but all the people around you knew you were guilty.What would happen then?
Most people won't be able to confirm or refute the story.
Most people would disbelieve the story, but keep you away from their children (at least unsupervised) and keep watch over you to check if you have any sexual deviances.
Be careful when hugging a child, it may be taken the wrong way.
A few nuts will believe the story outright and threaten your life.If you don't believe this, you don't understand human nature.Now I don't agree with the law.
There is no need for an "online harassment law" since we have a perfectly good slander law.
If its not covered under slander, then this shouldn't be covered either.IMO, this country has too many redundant laws, which end up being inconsistent.
How on earth is a citizen supposed to obey the law if even lawyers, after several years of study, don't know them all?
And you can be sure that Police officers don't have the time to learn all the nuances of all laws, let alone all laws and all the laws that have been dropped.Unfortunately that's the problem with democracy.
If the country has all the laws it needs, politicians are redundant, so they need to show they are busy by creating new laws.
What this country needs is to split the senate congress and senate in two.
One set of politicians can thus be focused on making new laws.
Another set of politicians can be focused on repealing old redundant laws or simplifying old laws.
The two would balance each other out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771025</id>
	<title>There should be zero-tolerance for laws like this.</title>
	<author>Dreadneck</author>
	<datestamp>1255719900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What constitutes 'harm'? What constitutes 'intimidation'?  Laws like this are so broad in their language that they inevitably lead to absurd abuses of individual rights.</p><p>A personal example that comes to mind are the idiotic 'zero-tolerance' policies in our public schools.  My brother had to meet with the principle of my nephew's school because my nephew defended himself when three kids tried to jump him at school.  My brother had to stand there and explain to the principal (who was rightly embarrassed by having to enforce this ridiculous policy) that the day he tells his son to stand there and take an ass whipping will be the day that hell freezes over.</p><p>In contrast to the aforementioned ridiculous and pathetic situation, before society lost its mind in search of a world of wall to wall safety bumpers, I offer a more personal example.  One day in the 5th grade, a larger, older kid started picking on me on the way to the learning resource center. I told him to lay off.  He persisted. I chased him down (he ran when I turned on him) and whipped his ass.  After I explained to the principal what had happened, I got sent back to class and the little punk got three days suspension.</p><p>I learned that day that standing up for yourself in the face of unwarranted abuse is right and proper and the other kid learned that screwing with people has consequences - and that's as it should be.</p><p>My nephew was taught a very different lesson.  He was taught that self-defense is a crime and that the authorities will punish you for defending yourself - even in the face of imminent bodily harm and/or death!.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What constitutes 'harm ' ?
What constitutes 'intimidation ' ?
Laws like this are so broad in their language that they inevitably lead to absurd abuses of individual rights.A personal example that comes to mind are the idiotic 'zero-tolerance ' policies in our public schools .
My brother had to meet with the principle of my nephew 's school because my nephew defended himself when three kids tried to jump him at school .
My brother had to stand there and explain to the principal ( who was rightly embarrassed by having to enforce this ridiculous policy ) that the day he tells his son to stand there and take an ass whipping will be the day that hell freezes over.In contrast to the aforementioned ridiculous and pathetic situation , before society lost its mind in search of a world of wall to wall safety bumpers , I offer a more personal example .
One day in the 5th grade , a larger , older kid started picking on me on the way to the learning resource center .
I told him to lay off .
He persisted .
I chased him down ( he ran when I turned on him ) and whipped his ass .
After I explained to the principal what had happened , I got sent back to class and the little punk got three days suspension.I learned that day that standing up for yourself in the face of unwarranted abuse is right and proper and the other kid learned that screwing with people has consequences - and that 's as it should be.My nephew was taught a very different lesson .
He was taught that self-defense is a crime and that the authorities will punish you for defending yourself - even in the face of imminent bodily harm and/or death ! .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What constitutes 'harm'?
What constitutes 'intimidation'?
Laws like this are so broad in their language that they inevitably lead to absurd abuses of individual rights.A personal example that comes to mind are the idiotic 'zero-tolerance' policies in our public schools.
My brother had to meet with the principle of my nephew's school because my nephew defended himself when three kids tried to jump him at school.
My brother had to stand there and explain to the principal (who was rightly embarrassed by having to enforce this ridiculous policy) that the day he tells his son to stand there and take an ass whipping will be the day that hell freezes over.In contrast to the aforementioned ridiculous and pathetic situation, before society lost its mind in search of a world of wall to wall safety bumpers, I offer a more personal example.
One day in the 5th grade, a larger, older kid started picking on me on the way to the learning resource center.
I told him to lay off.
He persisted.
I chased him down (he ran when I turned on him) and whipped his ass.
After I explained to the principal what had happened, I got sent back to class and the little punk got three days suspension.I learned that day that standing up for yourself in the face of unwarranted abuse is right and proper and the other kid learned that screwing with people has consequences - and that's as it should be.My nephew was taught a very different lesson.
He was taught that self-defense is a crime and that the authorities will punish you for defending yourself - even in the face of imminent bodily harm and/or death!.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768955</id>
	<title>Re:The law's not that bad, actually</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255709520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, the law forbids fraud?</p><p>Or is it just specifically identity theft?</p><p>Or is it just both of these things, but on a 'com-put-ter'?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , the law forbids fraud ? Or is it just specifically identity theft ? Or is it just both of these things , but on a 'com-put-ter ' ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, the law forbids fraud?Or is it just specifically identity theft?Or is it just both of these things, but on a 'com-put-ter'?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29775409</id>
	<title>Re:socialnetdef</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255710180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, shut up!</p><p>Or I will send my brother over and he will make you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , shut up ! Or I will send my brother over and he will make you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, shut up!Or I will send my brother over and he will make you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769177</id>
	<title>Charges have already been dropped.  Just FYI</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255710600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It appears the charges have already been dropped.</p><p><a href="http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/64444412.html" title="mysanantonio.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/64444412.html</a> [mysanantonio.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It appears the charges have already been dropped.http : //www.mysanantonio.com/news/64444412.html [ mysanantonio.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It appears the charges have already been dropped.http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/64444412.html [mysanantonio.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772243</id>
	<title>Re:Approached from the wrong angle</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255726380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's much easier to toss the mouthy little bastards in jail for a short time.</p><p>They will learn a very valuable lesson.  The world does not respect abusive punks.</p><p>Now get off my lawn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's much easier to toss the mouthy little bastards in jail for a short time.They will learn a very valuable lesson .
The world does not respect abusive punks.Now get off my lawn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's much easier to toss the mouthy little bastards in jail for a short time.They will learn a very valuable lesson.
The world does not respect abusive punks.Now get off my lawn.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768399</id>
	<title>Is the internet different from being in person?</title>
	<author>TheRealPacmanJones</author>
	<datestamp>1255706820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they did these same things in person I imagine the worst penalty would be some detention or a being grounded. Should it be different? I suppose you have a much larger audience(potentially) on the internet but should it be a felony. I think its overkill.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they did these same things in person I imagine the worst penalty would be some detention or a being grounded .
Should it be different ?
I suppose you have a much larger audience ( potentially ) on the internet but should it be a felony .
I think its overkill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they did these same things in person I imagine the worst penalty would be some detention or a being grounded.
Should it be different?
I suppose you have a much larger audience(potentially) on the internet but should it be a felony.
I think its overkill.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769117</id>
	<title>Re:The law's not that bad, actually</title>
	<author>Sarten-X</author>
	<datestamp>1255710300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm no lawyer, but reading the text appears to do several things:</p><p>1.a) Make fake accounts illegal. It's now a criminal offense to create an account using someone else's name, and use that to harass someone. The problem I see with this is simple ignorance. "I didn't know X was a real person" becomes an issue.</p><p>1.b) Make referring to someone else illegal. If I quote someone (and I were in Texas), I would need their authorization, if the quotation could be considered harmful.</p><p>1.f) Nothing at all. "The term does not include an electronic mail program or a message board program." Depending on how savvy the legal system is, it could be determined that all website messaging systems fall under the category of "message board programs". If not, then the exclusion pushes harassment to other media, such as instant messages, chat rooms, IRC, etc.</p><p>To me (and again, I'm not a lawyer) it seems this law was written in a quick response to a widely-publicized event, but that little exception for message boards could, depending on a test in court, potentially make the law useless.</p><p>Regarding the first amendment issues, the only thing I see is the requirement of authorization for a reference. As I read it, that subsection's supposed to prevent revealing someone else's identity, but I'd wager it could be abused easily to prevent whistleblowing. If you're trying to make public a company's practices, you can't mention any names without being very careful. If it appears the named person "authorized" the leak at all, you're committing a crime.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm no lawyer , but reading the text appears to do several things : 1.a ) Make fake accounts illegal .
It 's now a criminal offense to create an account using someone else 's name , and use that to harass someone .
The problem I see with this is simple ignorance .
" I did n't know X was a real person " becomes an issue.1.b ) Make referring to someone else illegal .
If I quote someone ( and I were in Texas ) , I would need their authorization , if the quotation could be considered harmful.1.f ) Nothing at all .
" The term does not include an electronic mail program or a message board program .
" Depending on how savvy the legal system is , it could be determined that all website messaging systems fall under the category of " message board programs " .
If not , then the exclusion pushes harassment to other media , such as instant messages , chat rooms , IRC , etc.To me ( and again , I 'm not a lawyer ) it seems this law was written in a quick response to a widely-publicized event , but that little exception for message boards could , depending on a test in court , potentially make the law useless.Regarding the first amendment issues , the only thing I see is the requirement of authorization for a reference .
As I read it , that subsection 's supposed to prevent revealing someone else 's identity , but I 'd wager it could be abused easily to prevent whistleblowing .
If you 're trying to make public a company 's practices , you ca n't mention any names without being very careful .
If it appears the named person " authorized " the leak at all , you 're committing a crime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm no lawyer, but reading the text appears to do several things:1.a) Make fake accounts illegal.
It's now a criminal offense to create an account using someone else's name, and use that to harass someone.
The problem I see with this is simple ignorance.
"I didn't know X was a real person" becomes an issue.1.b) Make referring to someone else illegal.
If I quote someone (and I were in Texas), I would need their authorization, if the quotation could be considered harmful.1.f) Nothing at all.
"The term does not include an electronic mail program or a message board program.
" Depending on how savvy the legal system is, it could be determined that all website messaging systems fall under the category of "message board programs".
If not, then the exclusion pushes harassment to other media, such as instant messages, chat rooms, IRC, etc.To me (and again, I'm not a lawyer) it seems this law was written in a quick response to a widely-publicized event, but that little exception for message boards could, depending on a test in court, potentially make the law useless.Regarding the first amendment issues, the only thing I see is the requirement of authorization for a reference.
As I read it, that subsection's supposed to prevent revealing someone else's identity, but I'd wager it could be abused easily to prevent whistleblowing.
If you're trying to make public a company's practices, you can't mention any names without being very careful.
If it appears the named person "authorized" the leak at all, you're committing a crime.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771133</id>
	<title>Re:Good Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255720320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This law has nothing to do with the scenario you described.  What are you saying "is a very serious thing"? Harassing someone online because that the law that's being discussed and not fraudulently claiming to be someone else or defaming someone online which is what you describe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This law has nothing to do with the scenario you described .
What are you saying " is a very serious thing " ?
Harassing someone online because that the law that 's being discussed and not fraudulently claiming to be someone else or defaming someone online which is what you describe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This law has nothing to do with the scenario you described.
What are you saying "is a very serious thing"?
Harassing someone online because that the law that's being discussed and not fraudulently claiming to be someone else or defaming someone online which is what you describe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768561</id>
	<title>Bufford T. Justice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255707660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your Honor...Jr. here is a sensitive young man and his mama, God rest her soul, would not approve of such a slack jawed use of our great American language.  Would "Your Honor" be so kind as to make a law that would severly punish those little pukes who would discrace her wishes which were always in the best interest of the "Independent" state of Texas under the Lord God Almighty himself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your Honor...Jr. here is a sensitive young man and his mama , God rest her soul , would not approve of such a slack jawed use of our great American language .
Would " Your Honor " be so kind as to make a law that would severly punish those little pukes who would discrace her wishes which were always in the best interest of the " Independent " state of Texas under the Lord God Almighty himself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your Honor...Jr. here is a sensitive young man and his mama, God rest her soul, would not approve of such a slack jawed use of our great American language.
Would "Your Honor" be so kind as to make a law that would severly punish those little pukes who would discrace her wishes which were always in the best interest of the "Independent" state of Texas under the Lord God Almighty himself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769951</id>
	<title>Re:Idiocracy</title>
	<author>falckon</author>
	<datestamp>1255714440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Obviously Texas lawmakers are unfamiliar with the legal principle "Sticks and stones make break my bones, but words will never hurt me!" If I post online that Cmdr Taco is a goat fucker, have I really "harmed" him or his reputation in any way? It's not slander unless a reasonable person would believe it to be true, and no rational person believes Taco actually dates outside his own species (unlike Captain Kirk).</p></div><p>
We all saw it, time to put out an affidavit for the arrest of Coward, first name Anonymous.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously Texas lawmakers are unfamiliar with the legal principle " Sticks and stones make break my bones , but words will never hurt me !
" If I post online that Cmdr Taco is a goat fucker , have I really " harmed " him or his reputation in any way ?
It 's not slander unless a reasonable person would believe it to be true , and no rational person believes Taco actually dates outside his own species ( unlike Captain Kirk ) .
We all saw it , time to put out an affidavit for the arrest of Coward , first name Anonymous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously Texas lawmakers are unfamiliar with the legal principle "Sticks and stones make break my bones, but words will never hurt me!
" If I post online that Cmdr Taco is a goat fucker, have I really "harmed" him or his reputation in any way?
It's not slander unless a reasonable person would believe it to be true, and no rational person believes Taco actually dates outside his own species (unlike Captain Kirk).
We all saw it, time to put out an affidavit for the arrest of Coward, first name Anonymous.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771373</id>
	<title>Re:Hard cases...</title>
	<author>SCHecklerX</author>
	<datestamp>1255721520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remember this?</p><p><a href="http://homes.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html" title="eff.org">http://homes.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html</a> [eff.org]</p><p>Oh well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember this ? http : //homes.eff.org/ ~ barlow/Declaration-Final.html [ eff.org ] Oh well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember this?http://homes.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html [eff.org]Oh well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768377</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771303</id>
	<title>Re:socialnetdef</title>
	<author>apoc.famine</author>
	<datestamp>1255721220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's an ASNS, actually. Have you ever read the comments posted here?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's an ASNS , actually .
Have you ever read the comments posted here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's an ASNS, actually.
Have you ever read the comments posted here?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773101</id>
	<title>Re:SHITCOCK!</title>
	<author>Translation Error</author>
	<datestamp>1255688220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>But seriously, I tell my kid and other kids in my family - don't say anything you wouldn't say in person.</p></div></blockquote><p>
I think a better rule is not to say anything your wouldn't say while being recorded (which you are).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But seriously , I tell my kid and other kids in my family - do n't say anything you would n't say in person .
I think a better rule is not to say anything your would n't say while being recorded ( which you are ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But seriously, I tell my kid and other kids in my family - don't say anything you wouldn't say in person.
I think a better rule is not to say anything your wouldn't say while being recorded (which you are).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771405</id>
	<title>Re:Idiocracy</title>
	<author>Capt.DrumkenBum</author>
	<datestamp>1255721700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Ask Megan Meier's parents how well that's working out for them.</p></div></blockquote><p>
If your child is so fragile that they commit suicide due anything that happens online, they are not going to make it, and as a parent you have done a terrible job of raising them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ask Megan Meier 's parents how well that 's working out for them .
If your child is so fragile that they commit suicide due anything that happens online , they are not going to make it , and as a parent you have done a terrible job of raising them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ask Megan Meier's parents how well that's working out for them.
If your child is so fragile that they commit suicide due anything that happens online, they are not going to make it, and as a parent you have done a terrible job of raising them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768595</id>
	<title>The law's not that bad, actually</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255707780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/81R/billtext/html/HB02003F.htm" title="state.tx.us">Here's the text</a> [state.tx.us]. Basically all it targets are people who harass others online assuming another person's identity. One girl creating a profile for another, where she claims to be a homosexual drug user who steals to support her habit would fall under this. Generic harassment doesn't. About the only thing that is far-reaching, and it's likely based on ignorance, is the "domain address" language which could be twisted by a prosecutor.
<br> <br>
Perhaps the law goes too far on the punishment side, but it doesn't prohibit any behavior which is protected by the first amendment. Only a moron would say "there are first amendment issues" since this law is little more than a double whammy on libel and slander.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's the text [ state.tx.us ] .
Basically all it targets are people who harass others online assuming another person 's identity .
One girl creating a profile for another , where she claims to be a homosexual drug user who steals to support her habit would fall under this .
Generic harassment does n't .
About the only thing that is far-reaching , and it 's likely based on ignorance , is the " domain address " language which could be twisted by a prosecutor .
Perhaps the law goes too far on the punishment side , but it does n't prohibit any behavior which is protected by the first amendment .
Only a moron would say " there are first amendment issues " since this law is little more than a double whammy on libel and slander .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's the text [state.tx.us].
Basically all it targets are people who harass others online assuming another person's identity.
One girl creating a profile for another, where she claims to be a homosexual drug user who steals to support her habit would fall under this.
Generic harassment doesn't.
About the only thing that is far-reaching, and it's likely based on ignorance, is the "domain address" language which could be twisted by a prosecutor.
Perhaps the law goes too far on the punishment side, but it doesn't prohibit any behavior which is protected by the first amendment.
Only a moron would say "there are first amendment issues" since this law is little more than a double whammy on libel and slander.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768741</id>
	<title>Re:Idiocracy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255708440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Obviously Texas lawmakers are unfamiliar with the legal principle</i>
<br>
<br>
In Texas lawmakers tend to be unfamiliar with ANY legal principle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously Texas lawmakers are unfamiliar with the legal principle In Texas lawmakers tend to be unfamiliar with ANY legal principle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously Texas lawmakers are unfamiliar with the legal principle


In Texas lawmakers tend to be unfamiliar with ANY legal principle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770327</id>
	<title>Re:Good Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255716300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's every bit as good an idea as criminalizing all the other cruel, nasty things children do to each other.</p><p>By which I mean to say it's idiotic. WTF are you thinking? Making it a crime to do things that, horrid as they are, we know to be part of normal human development?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's every bit as good an idea as criminalizing all the other cruel , nasty things children do to each other.By which I mean to say it 's idiotic .
WTF are you thinking ?
Making it a crime to do things that , horrid as they are , we know to be part of normal human development ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's every bit as good an idea as criminalizing all the other cruel, nasty things children do to each other.By which I mean to say it's idiotic.
WTF are you thinking?
Making it a crime to do things that, horrid as they are, we know to be part of normal human development?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771083</id>
	<title>plzdiethx Tag</title>
	<author>aquatone282</author>
	<datestamp>1255720140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>God, I love<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. humor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>God , I love / .
humor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>God, I love /.
humor.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768611</id>
	<title>Let's have some fun with the law!</title>
	<author>Interoperable</author>
	<datestamp>1255707900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>/. should try to get a volunteer prosecuted for violating a Term of Service in a hilarious manner. Try to get some free legal counsel for both sides from civil liberties group or from a law firm looking for publicity and then run the sham law suit as far as possible in the court system.</p><p>I think it's critical to set precedent by addressing the issue directly rather than via an emotionally confused case. By the same token, I think it would be fun to run a few sham software licence related law suits through the courts. Come on! It'll be fun!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>/ .
should try to get a volunteer prosecuted for violating a Term of Service in a hilarious manner .
Try to get some free legal counsel for both sides from civil liberties group or from a law firm looking for publicity and then run the sham law suit as far as possible in the court system.I think it 's critical to set precedent by addressing the issue directly rather than via an emotionally confused case .
By the same token , I think it would be fun to run a few sham software licence related law suits through the courts .
Come on !
It 'll be fun !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>/.
should try to get a volunteer prosecuted for violating a Term of Service in a hilarious manner.
Try to get some free legal counsel for both sides from civil liberties group or from a law firm looking for publicity and then run the sham law suit as far as possible in the court system.I think it's critical to set precedent by addressing the issue directly rather than via an emotionally confused case.
By the same token, I think it would be fun to run a few sham software licence related law suits through the courts.
Come on!
It'll be fun!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768775</id>
	<title>Re:SHITCOCK!</title>
	<author>Interoperable</author>
	<datestamp>1255708620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"I'm gonna punch your face until you bleed from the asshole" </p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>...you fucking piece of shit! I'LL KILL YOU!</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>But seriously, I tell my kid...</p></div><p>Uh oh.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 'm gon na punch your face until you bleed from the asshole " ...you fucking piece of shit !
I 'LL KILL YOU ! But seriously , I tell my kid...Uh oh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I'm gonna punch your face until you bleed from the asshole" ...you fucking piece of shit!
I'LL KILL YOU!But seriously, I tell my kid...Uh oh.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768635</id>
	<title>Re:SHITCOCK!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255708080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's a big difference between saying "This person, IMHO, is an asshole" and "I'm gonna punch your face until you bleed from the asshole" (just an example, I have never ever said such horrendous things. I'm appalled that you would take me for that kind of person you fucking piece of shit! I'LL KILL YOU!)</p><p>But seriously, I tell my kid and other kids in my family - don't say anything you wouldn't say in person. And if you threaten someone in person, well that's assault.</p><p>People need to learn that being a SHITCOCK Internet Fuckwad is unacceptable. People also need to grow thicker skin, but when it truly hurts someone it's time to stop.</p></div><p>You're an ass. I just spent the last twenty minutes digging through your old comments; no horrendous threats.</p><p>If I knew who you are in real life... for wasting my time...</p><p>I'm going to be watching your posts from now on and talking shit about you.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and there's nothing you can do about it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a big difference between saying " This person , IMHO , is an asshole " and " I 'm gon na punch your face until you bleed from the asshole " ( just an example , I have never ever said such horrendous things .
I 'm appalled that you would take me for that kind of person you fucking piece of shit !
I 'LL KILL YOU !
) But seriously , I tell my kid and other kids in my family - do n't say anything you would n't say in person .
And if you threaten someone in person , well that 's assault.People need to learn that being a SHITCOCK Internet Fuckwad is unacceptable .
People also need to grow thicker skin , but when it truly hurts someone it 's time to stop.You 're an ass .
I just spent the last twenty minutes digging through your old comments ; no horrendous threats.If I knew who you are in real life... for wasting my time...I 'm going to be watching your posts from now on and talking shit about you .
... and there 's nothing you can do about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a big difference between saying "This person, IMHO, is an asshole" and "I'm gonna punch your face until you bleed from the asshole" (just an example, I have never ever said such horrendous things.
I'm appalled that you would take me for that kind of person you fucking piece of shit!
I'LL KILL YOU!
)But seriously, I tell my kid and other kids in my family - don't say anything you wouldn't say in person.
And if you threaten someone in person, well that's assault.People need to learn that being a SHITCOCK Internet Fuckwad is unacceptable.
People also need to grow thicker skin, but when it truly hurts someone it's time to stop.You're an ass.
I just spent the last twenty minutes digging through your old comments; no horrendous threats.If I knew who you are in real life... for wasting my time...I'm going to be watching your posts from now on and talking shit about you.
... and there's nothing you can do about it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29775981</id>
	<title>Re:Good Idea</title>
	<author>ZmeiGorynych</author>
	<datestamp>1255721520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Concur on all points</htmltext>
<tokenext>Concur on all points</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Concur on all points</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770361</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769325</id>
	<title>"... one or more messages ..."</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255711440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How can one message be harassment?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How can one message be harassment ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can one message be harassment?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768941</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255709460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, go to the news story and read the comments. What a bunch of idiots, saying she deserved it. Does free speech exist anymore?</p><p>I love how these people are so willing and eager to give up their rights, to protect some peoples 'feelings'. Anyone that made a comment saying it wasn't right or too harsh (Felony for hateful speech on the internet? Haha...) got mass thumbs down.</p><p>Ah well, it's Texas I guess, so I'm not surprised. That place is fucked up anyways.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , go to the news story and read the comments .
What a bunch of idiots , saying she deserved it .
Does free speech exist anymore ? I love how these people are so willing and eager to give up their rights , to protect some peoples 'feelings' .
Anyone that made a comment saying it was n't right or too harsh ( Felony for hateful speech on the internet ?
Haha... ) got mass thumbs down.Ah well , it 's Texas I guess , so I 'm not surprised .
That place is fucked up anyways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, go to the news story and read the comments.
What a bunch of idiots, saying she deserved it.
Does free speech exist anymore?I love how these people are so willing and eager to give up their rights, to protect some peoples 'feelings'.
Anyone that made a comment saying it wasn't right or too harsh (Felony for hateful speech on the internet?
Haha...) got mass thumbs down.Ah well, it's Texas I guess, so I'm not surprised.
That place is fucked up anyways.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769251</id>
	<title>Re:Idiocracy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255711080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Obviously Texas lawmakers are unfamiliar with the legal principle "Sticks and stones make break my bones, but words will never hurt me!" If I post online that Cmdr Taco is a goat fucker, have I really "harmed" him or his reputation in any way? It's not slander unless a reasonable person would believe it to be true, and no rational person believes Taco actually dates outside his own species (unlike Captain Kirk).</p></div><p>Your example is not accurate... it would be more like if you created a Cmdr Taco profile on another website and pretended to be Cmdr Taco and posted that you (ie. fake Cmdr Taco) like to fuck goats.</p><p>This law is more about identity theft than mere harassment.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously Texas lawmakers are unfamiliar with the legal principle " Sticks and stones make break my bones , but words will never hurt me !
" If I post online that Cmdr Taco is a goat fucker , have I really " harmed " him or his reputation in any way ?
It 's not slander unless a reasonable person would believe it to be true , and no rational person believes Taco actually dates outside his own species ( unlike Captain Kirk ) .Your example is not accurate... it would be more like if you created a Cmdr Taco profile on another website and pretended to be Cmdr Taco and posted that you ( ie .
fake Cmdr Taco ) like to fuck goats.This law is more about identity theft than mere harassment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously Texas lawmakers are unfamiliar with the legal principle "Sticks and stones make break my bones, but words will never hurt me!
" If I post online that Cmdr Taco is a goat fucker, have I really "harmed" him or his reputation in any way?
It's not slander unless a reasonable person would believe it to be true, and no rational person believes Taco actually dates outside his own species (unlike Captain Kirk).Your example is not accurate... it would be more like if you created a Cmdr Taco profile on another website and pretended to be Cmdr Taco and posted that you (ie.
fake Cmdr Taco) like to fuck goats.This law is more about identity theft than mere harassment.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769957</id>
	<title>Newsflash:  Teenagers are stupid and selfish</title>
	<author>ShannaraFan</author>
	<datestamp>1255714440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I own two of them, I know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I own two of them , I know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I own two of them, I know.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768669</id>
	<title>Re:Two to Ten Years and Up To Ten Grand</title>
	<author>rwv</author>
	<datestamp>1255708200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>for you adults who like to poke and prod people online<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... better think twice</p></div><p>Thinking twice is generally good advise whenever the action that you are going to take can be perceived as "being a dick".  While they can't make general rules against "being a dick", I think having enforceable laws like this is a good help.

</p><p>I'm not sure "2 years in prison" is a good punishment for this.  I think 2 weeks in prison for "petty internet harassment" that doesn't have any serious outcome would be more fitting for MOST cases.  Regarding the Lori Drew case, however, 10 years would seem fair.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>for you adults who like to poke and prod people online ... better think twiceThinking twice is generally good advise whenever the action that you are going to take can be perceived as " being a dick " .
While they ca n't make general rules against " being a dick " , I think having enforceable laws like this is a good help .
I 'm not sure " 2 years in prison " is a good punishment for this .
I think 2 weeks in prison for " petty internet harassment " that does n't have any serious outcome would be more fitting for MOST cases .
Regarding the Lori Drew case , however , 10 years would seem fair .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for you adults who like to poke and prod people online ... better think twiceThinking twice is generally good advise whenever the action that you are going to take can be perceived as "being a dick".
While they can't make general rules against "being a dick", I think having enforceable laws like this is a good help.
I'm not sure "2 years in prison" is a good punishment for this.
I think 2 weeks in prison for "petty internet harassment" that doesn't have any serious outcome would be more fitting for MOST cases.
Regarding the Lori Drew case, however, 10 years would seem fair.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768735</id>
	<title>Re:SHITCOCK!</title>
	<author>e2d2</author>
	<datestamp>1255708380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uhm, actually it is. Unless you have another version you'd like to supply smarty pants.</p><p>assault: A violent physical or verbal attack.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uhm , actually it is .
Unless you have another version you 'd like to supply smarty pants.assault : A violent physical or verbal attack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uhm, actually it is.
Unless you have another version you'd like to supply smarty pants.assault: A violent physical or verbal attack.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768499</id>
	<title>Hopefully this case is overturned on appeal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255707360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you review this ridiculous law (http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/81R/billtext/pdf/HB02003I.pdf ) you can deduce that it is a Class A misdemeanor to uses the name or persona of another person to create a web page on or to post one or more messages on a commercial social networking site with the intent to embarrass any person. It could becomes a third degree felony if the actor commits the offense with the intent to "harm" another. Hopefully this case is overturned on appeal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you review this ridiculous law ( http : //www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/81R/billtext/pdf/HB02003I.pdf ) you can deduce that it is a Class A misdemeanor to uses the name or persona of another person to create a web page on or to post one or more messages on a commercial social networking site with the intent to embarrass any person .
It could becomes a third degree felony if the actor commits the offense with the intent to " harm " another .
Hopefully this case is overturned on appeal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you review this ridiculous law (http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/81R/billtext/pdf/HB02003I.pdf ) you can deduce that it is a Class A misdemeanor to uses the name or persona of another person to create a web page on or to post one or more messages on a commercial social networking site with the intent to embarrass any person.
It could becomes a third degree felony if the actor commits the offense with the intent to "harm" another.
Hopefully this case is overturned on appeal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768395</id>
	<title>think of the trolls!</title>
	<author>el\_tedward</author>
	<datestamp>1255706820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is outrageous! What will we do if we can't go around the internet spewing ridiculous and inflammatory comments at the expense of others for our own amusement?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is outrageous !
What will we do if we ca n't go around the internet spewing ridiculous and inflammatory comments at the expense of others for our own amusement ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is outrageous!
What will we do if we can't go around the internet spewing ridiculous and inflammatory comments at the expense of others for our own amusement?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768425</id>
	<title>BEHOLD!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255707000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can of worms, I  dub thee COLOSUS!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can of worms , I dub thee COLOSUS !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can of worms, I  dub thee COLOSUS!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771691</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>acohen1</author>
	<datestamp>1255723260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It sounds like the person harassing you was also committing lots of fraud which would have been a bit easier to prove and carries rather harsh penalties.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It sounds like the person harassing you was also committing lots of fraud which would have been a bit easier to prove and carries rather harsh penalties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It sounds like the person harassing you was also committing lots of fraud which would have been a bit easier to prove and carries rather harsh penalties.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768347</id>
	<title>Kids can say really, really nasty things.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255706520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When you're a kid, you can have the intellect of an adult in knowing how to hurt someone, but none of the barriers against doing so. Kids are often the ultimate narcissists.</p><p>Not that I neccessarily mean that police should be involved, but just to offer a dissenting view from the number of posts that will dismiss this as just "your trousers are so ugly".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When you 're a kid , you can have the intellect of an adult in knowing how to hurt someone , but none of the barriers against doing so .
Kids are often the ultimate narcissists.Not that I neccessarily mean that police should be involved , but just to offer a dissenting view from the number of posts that will dismiss this as just " your trousers are so ugly " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you're a kid, you can have the intellect of an adult in knowing how to hurt someone, but none of the barriers against doing so.
Kids are often the ultimate narcissists.Not that I neccessarily mean that police should be involved, but just to offer a dissenting view from the number of posts that will dismiss this as just "your trousers are so ugly".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769559</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmm..</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1255712520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I was in 7th grade there was no interent, and the only computers were mainframes. But nonetheless I goy bullied by a kid who was a good five inches taller than me and at least 40 pounds heavier. One day the punk slapped me, and I lost it and pummelled him GOOD.</p><p>I got a swat for that, he got 18 swats (the teachers had seen the previous bullying). And nobody gave me any shit after that, in fact I got instant respect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was in 7th grade there was no interent , and the only computers were mainframes .
But nonetheless I goy bullied by a kid who was a good five inches taller than me and at least 40 pounds heavier .
One day the punk slapped me , and I lost it and pummelled him GOOD.I got a swat for that , he got 18 swats ( the teachers had seen the previous bullying ) .
And nobody gave me any shit after that , in fact I got instant respect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was in 7th grade there was no interent, and the only computers were mainframes.
But nonetheless I goy bullied by a kid who was a good five inches taller than me and at least 40 pounds heavier.
One day the punk slapped me, and I lost it and pummelled him GOOD.I got a swat for that, he got 18 swats (the teachers had seen the previous bullying).
And nobody gave me any shit after that, in fact I got instant respect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768505</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29775343</id>
	<title>Re:Harmful? Are they kidding???</title>
	<author>Criton</author>
	<datestamp>1255708860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes it does run a ground of the first amendment and really should be the target of lawsuits.

Really for once I'm tankful for lawyers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes it does run a ground of the first amendment and really should be the target of lawsuits .
Really for once I 'm tankful for lawyers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes it does run a ground of the first amendment and really should be the target of lawsuits.
Really for once I'm tankful for lawyers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769383</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772863</id>
	<title>Re:Good Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255686660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yes, let's have the state of texas charge and convict the little menace with a 3rd degree felony, then squeeze him into our overflowing prison system.</p><p>or</p><p>the principle could simply expel the kid for breaking some rules.</p><p>what seems more reasonable to you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yes , let 's have the state of texas charge and convict the little menace with a 3rd degree felony , then squeeze him into our overflowing prison system.orthe principle could simply expel the kid for breaking some rules.what seems more reasonable to you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yes, let's have the state of texas charge and convict the little menace with a 3rd degree felony, then squeeze him into our overflowing prison system.orthe principle could simply expel the kid for breaking some rules.what seems more reasonable to you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771577</id>
	<title>Need more details</title>
	<author>Fujisawa Sensei</author>
	<datestamp>1255722720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An important detail that's been left out was the cheerleader issue. In Texas, and many other states, the cheerleader is always right. So if either girl is a cheerleader, the other one is going to be in deep trouble.</p><p>If the cheerleader test fails, there are other tests such whose daddy tithes the most. Or if any of their parents are registered Democrats, they automatically lose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An important detail that 's been left out was the cheerleader issue .
In Texas , and many other states , the cheerleader is always right .
So if either girl is a cheerleader , the other one is going to be in deep trouble.If the cheerleader test fails , there are other tests such whose daddy tithes the most .
Or if any of their parents are registered Democrats , they automatically lose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An important detail that's been left out was the cheerleader issue.
In Texas, and many other states, the cheerleader is always right.
So if either girl is a cheerleader, the other one is going to be in deep trouble.If the cheerleader test fails, there are other tests such whose daddy tithes the most.
Or if any of their parents are registered Democrats, they automatically lose.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768627</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>poetmatt</author>
	<datestamp>1255708020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>posts like yours would also constitute a felony, as I'd consider posting an asinine comment as harassment. how's that for equal logic?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>posts like yours would also constitute a felony , as I 'd consider posting an asinine comment as harassment .
how 's that for equal logic ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>posts like yours would also constitute a felony, as I'd consider posting an asinine comment as harassment.
how's that for equal logic?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770251</id>
	<title>Re:Good Idea</title>
	<author>R2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1255715820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sorry, but were you trying to be funny here?  Aside from the fact that laws against fraud already exist, are you seriously advocating bringing the might of a state or federal judiciary system down onto the modern equivalent of a chain letter?  Are your parents so weak that they couldn't demand accountability from the other kids parents?</p><p>There's a post higher up about people who believe that the law should take care of their needs, whatever they may be.  You might want to read that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry , but were you trying to be funny here ?
Aside from the fact that laws against fraud already exist , are you seriously advocating bringing the might of a state or federal judiciary system down onto the modern equivalent of a chain letter ?
Are your parents so weak that they could n't demand accountability from the other kids parents ? There 's a post higher up about people who believe that the law should take care of their needs , whatever they may be .
You might want to read that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry, but were you trying to be funny here?
Aside from the fact that laws against fraud already exist, are you seriously advocating bringing the might of a state or federal judiciary system down onto the modern equivalent of a chain letter?
Are your parents so weak that they couldn't demand accountability from the other kids parents?There's a post higher up about people who believe that the law should take care of their needs, whatever they may be.
You might want to read that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769315</id>
	<title>Re:SHITCOCK!</title>
	<author>DrivingBear</author>
	<datestamp>1255711440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>but when it truly hurts someone it's time to stop.</p></div><p>One of the difficulties with verbal abuse on the internet is the lack of feedback.  Unless the victim posts some sort of response there is no way for the attacker to see how her words are impacting the victim.  This is why we need to consider our words even more carefully on the internet or in email than in person.  It's often difficult, if not impossible, to judge how our words are being interpreted on the other end the line and then even further how they are emotionally affecting the recipient.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but when it truly hurts someone it 's time to stop.One of the difficulties with verbal abuse on the internet is the lack of feedback .
Unless the victim posts some sort of response there is no way for the attacker to see how her words are impacting the victim .
This is why we need to consider our words even more carefully on the internet or in email than in person .
It 's often difficult , if not impossible , to judge how our words are being interpreted on the other end the line and then even further how they are emotionally affecting the recipient .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but when it truly hurts someone it's time to stop.One of the difficulties with verbal abuse on the internet is the lack of feedback.
Unless the victim posts some sort of response there is no way for the attacker to see how her words are impacting the victim.
This is why we need to consider our words even more carefully on the internet or in email than in person.
It's often difficult, if not impossible, to judge how our words are being interpreted on the other end the line and then even further how they are emotionally affecting the recipient.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29775219</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>Criton</author>
	<datestamp>1255707000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes this is going to far she's just a kid and does not deserve such a punishment.
It makes me sick what is happening to this country and what kind of idiot laws are being passed.
It also it totally wrong to have a felony follow you for the rest of your life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes this is going to far she 's just a kid and does not deserve such a punishment .
It makes me sick what is happening to this country and what kind of idiot laws are being passed .
It also it totally wrong to have a felony follow you for the rest of your life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes this is going to far she's just a kid and does not deserve such a punishment.
It makes me sick what is happening to this country and what kind of idiot laws are being passed.
It also it totally wrong to have a felony follow you for the rest of your life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768905</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772499</id>
	<title>lori drew:</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1255684680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. knew her victim<br>2. created a sustained longterm effort<br>3. involved trickery and lying and emotional manipulation<br>4. was an adult preying on a child<br>5. knew the child had emotional problems</p><p>that's pretty specific</p><p>any law crafted after the lori drew case would work fine to punish future lori drews if its language zeroed in on these highlights. anything more broad of course, is avenue for inapplicability</p><p>an adult preyed on emotionally disturbed child they knew, for a day? thats not longterm</p><p>another child preyed on an emotionally disturbed child they knew in the longterm? it wasn't an adult committing the crime</p><p>an adult preyed on an emotionally disturbed child they didn't know over the longterm? they didn't know them</p><p>etc</p><p>if the law is specific enough, no problem</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1. knew her victim2 .
created a sustained longterm effort3 .
involved trickery and lying and emotional manipulation4 .
was an adult preying on a child5 .
knew the child had emotional problemsthat 's pretty specificany law crafted after the lori drew case would work fine to punish future lori drews if its language zeroed in on these highlights .
anything more broad of course , is avenue for inapplicabilityan adult preyed on emotionally disturbed child they knew , for a day ?
thats not longtermanother child preyed on an emotionally disturbed child they knew in the longterm ?
it was n't an adult committing the crimean adult preyed on an emotionally disturbed child they did n't know over the longterm ?
they did n't know themetcif the law is specific enough , no problem</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1. knew her victim2.
created a sustained longterm effort3.
involved trickery and lying and emotional manipulation4.
was an adult preying on a child5.
knew the child had emotional problemsthat's pretty specificany law crafted after the lori drew case would work fine to punish future lori drews if its language zeroed in on these highlights.
anything more broad of course, is avenue for inapplicabilityan adult preyed on emotionally disturbed child they knew, for a day?
thats not longtermanother child preyed on an emotionally disturbed child they knew in the longterm?
it wasn't an adult committing the crimean adult preyed on an emotionally disturbed child they didn't know over the longterm?
they didn't know themetcif the law is specific enough, no problem</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521</id>
	<title>Good Idea</title>
	<author>Bagellord</author>
	<datestamp>1255707480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I honestly think this is a good law. Case in point: a kid in my little brother's class created a myspace page using my brother's name and picture and put some truly disturbing stuff on there. We only found out about it because one of his classmates texted him asking about it. The headmaster of our school almost expelled him over it. This is a very serious thing. It can cause emotional damage to the victim, and can ruin their reputation. The kid who did it sent all kinds of rude and nasty messages to people who saw my brother's page and sent friend requests. This law is a good idea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I honestly think this is a good law .
Case in point : a kid in my little brother 's class created a myspace page using my brother 's name and picture and put some truly disturbing stuff on there .
We only found out about it because one of his classmates texted him asking about it .
The headmaster of our school almost expelled him over it .
This is a very serious thing .
It can cause emotional damage to the victim , and can ruin their reputation .
The kid who did it sent all kinds of rude and nasty messages to people who saw my brother 's page and sent friend requests .
This law is a good idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I honestly think this is a good law.
Case in point: a kid in my little brother's class created a myspace page using my brother's name and picture and put some truly disturbing stuff on there.
We only found out about it because one of his classmates texted him asking about it.
The headmaster of our school almost expelled him over it.
This is a very serious thing.
It can cause emotional damage to the victim, and can ruin their reputation.
The kid who did it sent all kinds of rude and nasty messages to people who saw my brother's page and sent friend requests.
This law is a good idea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770461</id>
	<title>Re:Idiocracy</title>
	<author>Martin Spamer</author>
	<datestamp>1255717020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"Sticks and stones make break my bones, but words will never hurt me!"</i> is false, bullying causes long term <a href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpsoc/bjep/1999/00000069/00000001/art00007" title="ingentaconnect.com">physiological</a> [ingentaconnect.com] and psychological harm including <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posttraumatic\_stress\_disorder" title="wikipedia.org">Post traumatic stress disorder</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Sticks and stones make break my bones , but words will never hurt me !
" is false , bullying causes long term physiological [ ingentaconnect.com ] and psychological harm including Post traumatic stress disorder [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Sticks and stones make break my bones, but words will never hurt me!
" is false, bullying causes long term physiological [ingentaconnect.com] and psychological harm including Post traumatic stress disorder [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769151</id>
	<title>Re:About time</title>
	<author>Lemmy Caution</author>
	<datestamp>1255710420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, bummer about that. Maybe it'll be effective deterrence.</p><p>Sorry, but I am a lot more sympathetic to teens who get records for non-malicious behaviors, like having consensual sex with their peers or getting caught with weed. The kind of behavior we're talking about can be as destructive as a beat-down.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , bummer about that .
Maybe it 'll be effective deterrence.Sorry , but I am a lot more sympathetic to teens who get records for non-malicious behaviors , like having consensual sex with their peers or getting caught with weed .
The kind of behavior we 're talking about can be as destructive as a beat-down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, bummer about that.
Maybe it'll be effective deterrence.Sorry, but I am a lot more sympathetic to teens who get records for non-malicious behaviors, like having consensual sex with their peers or getting caught with weed.
The kind of behavior we're talking about can be as destructive as a beat-down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768905</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769017</id>
	<title>Re:SHITCOCK!</title>
	<author>rahlquist</author>
	<datestamp>1255709760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>10 seconds in google can save you from a lifetime of shortsightedness...</p><p><a href="http://definitions.uslegal.com/t/terroristic-threat/" title="uslegal.com">http://definitions.uslegal.com/t/terroristic-threat/</a> [uslegal.com]</p><p>In most places in the US a threat against a person is now considered a Terroristic Threat and is actionable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>10 seconds in google can save you from a lifetime of shortsightedness...http : //definitions.uslegal.com/t/terroristic-threat/ [ uslegal.com ] In most places in the US a threat against a person is now considered a Terroristic Threat and is actionable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10 seconds in google can save you from a lifetime of shortsightedness...http://definitions.uslegal.com/t/terroristic-threat/ [uslegal.com]In most places in the US a threat against a person is now considered a Terroristic Threat and is actionable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29776001</id>
	<title>Because they're kids</title>
	<author>ZmeiGorynych</author>
	<datestamp>1255721880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And I hope nobody comes up with a way to treat that... Kids will do stupid shit, that's normal, and I think only in extreme cases, such as causing serious bodily harm to others, should the lives of those kids be damaged by including a jail sentence. Getting beat up by their peers, however, or in fact spanked by their parents, would provide a useful short-term feedback in many cases.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And I hope nobody comes up with a way to treat that... Kids will do stupid shit , that 's normal , and I think only in extreme cases , such as causing serious bodily harm to others , should the lives of those kids be damaged by including a jail sentence .
Getting beat up by their peers , however , or in fact spanked by their parents , would provide a useful short-term feedback in many cases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I hope nobody comes up with a way to treat that... Kids will do stupid shit, that's normal, and I think only in extreme cases, such as causing serious bodily harm to others, should the lives of those kids be damaged by including a jail sentence.
Getting beat up by their peers, however, or in fact spanked by their parents, would provide a useful short-term feedback in many cases.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29775271</id>
	<title>Meanwhile in Chicago...</title>
	<author>Bl4ckJ3sus</author>
	<datestamp>1255707780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kids are murdering each other in the street using something other than words...
<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/13/record-36-students-killed-this-school-year-across-/" title="washingtontimes.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/13/record-36-students-killed-this-school-year-across-/</a> [washingtontimes.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kids are murdering each other in the street using something other than words.. . http : //www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/13/record-36-students-killed-this-school-year-across-/ [ washingtontimes.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kids are murdering each other in the street using something other than words...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/13/record-36-students-killed-this-school-year-across-/ [washingtontimes.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770561</id>
	<title>Re:Idiocracy</title>
	<author>Martin Spamer</author>
	<datestamp>1255717500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"Sticks and stones make break my bones, but words will never hurt me!"</i> is absolutely false.</p><p>Bullying causes long term <a href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpsoc/bjep/1999/00000069/00000001/art00007" title="ingentaconnect.com">physiological</a> [ingentaconnect.com] and <a href="http://www.academon.com/Research-Paper-School-Bullying/106613" title="academon.com">psychological</a> [academon.com] harm to the victim including <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posttraumatic\_stress\_disorder" title="wikipedia.org">Post traumatic stress disorder</a> [wikipedia.org].  Physical Bullying is illegal, we call it assault.  It is immaterial to the victim if the bullying was conducted first hand or remotely, it is wrong and should be punished.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Sticks and stones make break my bones , but words will never hurt me !
" is absolutely false.Bullying causes long term physiological [ ingentaconnect.com ] and psychological [ academon.com ] harm to the victim including Post traumatic stress disorder [ wikipedia.org ] .
Physical Bullying is illegal , we call it assault .
It is immaterial to the victim if the bullying was conducted first hand or remotely , it is wrong and should be punished .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Sticks and stones make break my bones, but words will never hurt me!
" is absolutely false.Bullying causes long term physiological [ingentaconnect.com] and psychological [academon.com] harm to the victim including Post traumatic stress disorder [wikipedia.org].
Physical Bullying is illegal, we call it assault.
It is immaterial to the victim if the bullying was conducted first hand or remotely, it is wrong and should be punished.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773453</id>
	<title>Texas sucks dick. Its run by crooked assholes.</title>
	<author>Jackie\_Chan\_Fan</author>
	<datestamp>1255690440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stay out of my state Texans, or else!</p><p>(Is that still legal to say?)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>FREEDOM OF.... sort of speech, as long as it doesnt say anything profound, offensive, or otherwise deemed inappropriate by the adulterous, corporate bribed, kid fucker traitors in Washington and your state government.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stay out of my state Texans , or else !
( Is that still legal to say ?
) : ) FREEDOM OF.... sort of speech , as long as it doesnt say anything profound , offensive , or otherwise deemed inappropriate by the adulterous , corporate bribed , kid fucker traitors in Washington and your state government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stay out of my state Texans, or else!
(Is that still legal to say?
) :)FREEDOM OF.... sort of speech, as long as it doesnt say anything profound, offensive, or otherwise deemed inappropriate by the adulterous, corporate bribed, kid fucker traitors in Washington and your state government.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768611
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769151
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772975
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770361
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29775981
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768595
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773555
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768795
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771691
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768595
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768775
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769949
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770425
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770299
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768527
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769719
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769933
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770449
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771735
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29779621
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769017
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771693
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768377
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768731
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768635
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770349
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29775343
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771133
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769251
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768579
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768787
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29775409
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768735
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768595
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768955
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768741
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768643
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770327
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768829
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769913
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770129
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773023
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770305
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768595
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771357
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29775259
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769955
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29774811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768651
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770571
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769987
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769559
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768829
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769393
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773113
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29774241
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768595
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773797
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770561
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768967
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29775219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770461
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771897
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773421
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29776001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773101
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770155
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768377
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770545
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768527
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770251
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768669
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768657
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771351
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_16_1410232_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768813
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768521
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772975
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29779621
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29774811
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772863
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771133
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770299
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770361
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29775981
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771735
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770327
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770129
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770251
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768307
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768343
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769957
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29774241
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772945
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768359
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768643
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768741
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769935
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768657
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768967
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768731
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769951
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770461
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769963
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771405
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768651
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770561
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769251
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768611
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773993
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769041
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768381
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768513
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773113
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771283
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771693
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769933
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770349
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769949
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768669
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769483
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769325
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768595
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769117
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771783
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770309
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773797
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772773
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768955
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768425
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768665
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768377
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771373
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768527
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769719
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769191
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770761
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768551
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771691
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768905
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29775219
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769151
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768829
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769393
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769913
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768627
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768681
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769005
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770449
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768471
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768819
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29775259
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769019
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770571
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771357
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29775409
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769471
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771303
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771351
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769987
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768877
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768579
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768787
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772745
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773555
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770197
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773023
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770545
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770155
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29772243
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29776001
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768395
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773421
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768367
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768635
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29771897
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768463
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768735
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769187
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768795
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769017
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768775
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29770425
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29773101
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769383
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29775343
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768563
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769281
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768771
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_16_1410232.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29768505
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_16_1410232.29769559
</commentlist>
</conversation>
