<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_15_2027250</id>
	<title>Toyota Claims Woman "Opted In" To Faux Email Stalking</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1255595820000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"ABC News is reporting that a California woman is suing Toyota for $10 million for <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=8776841">sending her email that appeared to be from a criminal stalker</a>.  The woman claims the emails terrified her to the point that she suffered sleeplessness, poor work performance, etc.  Toyota says the ruse was part of a marketing campaign for the Toyota Matrix.  A Toyota spokesman says they are not liable for the woman's distress, because 'The person who made this claim specifically opted in, granting her permission to receive campaign emails and other communications from Toyota.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " ABC News is reporting that a California woman is suing Toyota for $ 10 million for sending her email that appeared to be from a criminal stalker .
The woman claims the emails terrified her to the point that she suffered sleeplessness , poor work performance , etc .
Toyota says the ruse was part of a marketing campaign for the Toyota Matrix .
A Toyota spokesman says they are not liable for the woman 's distress , because 'The person who made this claim specifically opted in , granting her permission to receive campaign emails and other communications from Toyota .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "ABC News is reporting that a California woman is suing Toyota for $10 million for sending her email that appeared to be from a criminal stalker.
The woman claims the emails terrified her to the point that she suffered sleeplessness, poor work performance, etc.
Toyota says the ruse was part of a marketing campaign for the Toyota Matrix.
A Toyota spokesman says they are not liable for the woman's distress, because 'The person who made this claim specifically opted in, granting her permission to receive campaign emails and other communications from Toyota.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766641</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand advertising</title>
	<author>Aceticon</author>
	<datestamp>1255687140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I don't understand North American business and advertising in general.</p><p>When you want nothing to do with them, they call you during dinner with things you don't want and don't need. When you do need them, because something is wrong with their product, they let you talk to machines until you get fed up.</p></div></blockquote><p>In the first case they don't have your money yet.</p><p>In the second case they already have your money.</p><p>This sudden transition from star to looser for the customer happens less frequently in most places in Western Europe because stronger consumer laws mean that as a consumer you can much more easily claw back your money without spending a penny in lawyers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand North American business and advertising in general.When you want nothing to do with them , they call you during dinner with things you do n't want and do n't need .
When you do need them , because something is wrong with their product , they let you talk to machines until you get fed up.In the first case they do n't have your money yet.In the second case they already have your money.This sudden transition from star to looser for the customer happens less frequently in most places in Western Europe because stronger consumer laws mean that as a consumer you can much more easily claw back your money without spending a penny in lawyers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand North American business and advertising in general.When you want nothing to do with them, they call you during dinner with things you don't want and don't need.
When you do need them, because something is wrong with their product, they let you talk to machines until you get fed up.In the first case they don't have your money yet.In the second case they already have your money.This sudden transition from star to looser for the customer happens less frequently in most places in Western Europe because stronger consumer laws mean that as a consumer you can much more easily claw back your money without spending a penny in lawyers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762853</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>Red Flayer</author>
	<datestamp>1255600620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Saatchi &amp; Saatchi? They'll probably get more business because the dipshit MBAs will think that "there's no such thing as bad publicity."</p></div></blockquote><p>I had forgotten the existence of the Toyota Matrix until I read this article.<br> <br>When it comes to brand recognition, there IS no such thing as bad publicity.  Brand association, on the other hand...<br> <br>I'll be buying a commuter car in the next year. I was leaning toward a small Honda anyway -- but this gives me one more reason to not buy a Toyota.<br> <br>That said, when it comes down to it, it'll be about prices and reviews anyway.  And if this article helped me remember that Toyota offers a commuter car, then the PR campaign worked.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Saatchi &amp; Saatchi ?
They 'll probably get more business because the dipshit MBAs will think that " there 's no such thing as bad publicity .
" I had forgotten the existence of the Toyota Matrix until I read this article .
When it comes to brand recognition , there IS no such thing as bad publicity .
Brand association , on the other hand... I 'll be buying a commuter car in the next year .
I was leaning toward a small Honda anyway -- but this gives me one more reason to not buy a Toyota .
That said , when it comes down to it , it 'll be about prices and reviews anyway .
And if this article helped me remember that Toyota offers a commuter car , then the PR campaign worked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Saatchi &amp; Saatchi?
They'll probably get more business because the dipshit MBAs will think that "there's no such thing as bad publicity.
"I had forgotten the existence of the Toyota Matrix until I read this article.
When it comes to brand recognition, there IS no such thing as bad publicity.
Brand association, on the other hand... I'll be buying a commuter car in the next year.
I was leaning toward a small Honda anyway -- but this gives me one more reason to not buy a Toyota.
That said, when it comes down to it, it'll be about prices and reviews anyway.
And if this article helped me remember that Toyota offers a commuter car, then the PR campaign worked.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763469</id>
	<title>Looks like Toyota's marketing dept. is guilty</title>
	<author>onemorechip</author>
	<datestamp>1255605720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...of stupidity.</p><p>On the other hand, I hope their "opt-in" defense works. Such a precedent might discourage the use of "opt-out" by those who still use it. And BTW, I consider it to be "opt-out" if you have to uncheck an "opt-in" box that's pre-checked when the web form loads.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...of stupidity.On the other hand , I hope their " opt-in " defense works .
Such a precedent might discourage the use of " opt-out " by those who still use it .
And BTW , I consider it to be " opt-out " if you have to uncheck an " opt-in " box that 's pre-checked when the web form loads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...of stupidity.On the other hand, I hope their "opt-in" defense works.
Such a precedent might discourage the use of "opt-out" by those who still use it.
And BTW, I consider it to be "opt-out" if you have to uncheck an "opt-in" box that's pre-checked when the web form loads.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762873</id>
	<title>Re:Opted In</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1255602660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I received messages like that, I'm sure that I'd immediately run out and buy the car. Would that work for telephone soliciters?<br>CALLER: I'm coming over to kill you!<br>ME: Why yes, I'd like to test drive your new car.<br>CALLER: I'll also rape your dead body!<br>ME: Really! A free cookbook with a test drive. Awsome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I received messages like that , I 'm sure that I 'd immediately run out and buy the car .
Would that work for telephone soliciters ? CALLER : I 'm coming over to kill you ! ME : Why yes , I 'd like to test drive your new car.CALLER : I 'll also rape your dead body ! ME : Really !
A free cookbook with a test drive .
Awsome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I received messages like that, I'm sure that I'd immediately run out and buy the car.
Would that work for telephone soliciters?CALLER: I'm coming over to kill you!ME: Why yes, I'd like to test drive your new car.CALLER: I'll also rape your dead body!ME: Really!
A free cookbook with a test drive.
Awsome.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762083</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767293</id>
	<title>Terrifying</title>
	<author>nicktindall</author>
	<datestamp>1255698360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't imagine anything more terrifying than thinking that douchebag English "football hooligan" was coming to visit... even if I did know him.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't imagine anything more terrifying than thinking that douchebag English " football hooligan " was coming to visit... even if I did know him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't imagine anything more terrifying than thinking that douchebag English "football hooligan" was coming to visit... even if I did know him.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763125</id>
	<title>Re:Advertising these days...</title>
	<author>ilsaloving</author>
	<datestamp>1255603800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Having the members of a metal band groin thrust at a chicken until it bursts into flames is wierd.  This is just distasteful.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Having the members of a metal band groin thrust at a chicken until it bursts into flames is wierd .
This is just distasteful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having the members of a metal band groin thrust at a chicken until it bursts into flames is wierd.
This is just distasteful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762179</id>
	<title>targeted marketing</title>
	<author>bugi</author>
	<datestamp>1255600200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this what we can expect from targeted marketing, now that They have more information on each of us than we do of ourselves?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this what we can expect from targeted marketing , now that They have more information on each of us than we do of ourselves ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this what we can expect from targeted marketing, now that They have more information on each of us than we do of ourselves?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29770417</id>
	<title>Majestic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255716840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reminds me a bit of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic\_(video\_game)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Majestic</a> [wikipedia.org], except not a game but a line of advertisements.</p><p>Example (from Majestic):<br>"As an option to warn unsuspecting members in the same house you could enable a warning at the beginning of each phone call, and a small message on the top of all faxes."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me a bit of Majestic [ wikipedia.org ] , except not a game but a line of advertisements.Example ( from Majestic ) : " As an option to warn unsuspecting members in the same house you could enable a warning at the beginning of each phone call , and a small message on the top of all faxes .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me a bit of Majestic [wikipedia.org], except not a game but a line of advertisements.Example (from Majestic):"As an option to warn unsuspecting members in the same house you could enable a warning at the beginning of each phone call, and a small message on the top of all faxes.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763111</id>
	<title>Re:Scared?</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1255603740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What is with the 'victimization' culture these days?</p></div><p>You mean, among people who have genuine greviances?  Yeah, I know!  The "victims" of my pyramid scheme have SUCH a sense of entitlement!</p><p>Grow a pair and make some more money for me to steal.</p><p>I tried telling the judge that many of the people I ripped off weren't even trying to get new jobs at say, Mc Donalds to earn more money, so they obviously weren't hurt enough to change anything about their life.  Jerks.</p><p>Sincerely,<br>Bernie Maddoff</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is with the 'victimization ' culture these days ? You mean , among people who have genuine greviances ?
Yeah , I know !
The " victims " of my pyramid scheme have SUCH a sense of entitlement ! Grow a pair and make some more money for me to steal.I tried telling the judge that many of the people I ripped off were n't even trying to get new jobs at say , Mc Donalds to earn more money , so they obviously were n't hurt enough to change anything about their life .
Jerks.Sincerely,Bernie Maddoff</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is with the 'victimization' culture these days?You mean, among people who have genuine greviances?
Yeah, I know!
The "victims" of my pyramid scheme have SUCH a sense of entitlement!Grow a pair and make some more money for me to steal.I tried telling the judge that many of the people I ripped off weren't even trying to get new jobs at say, Mc Donalds to earn more money, so they obviously weren't hurt enough to change anything about their life.
Jerks.Sincerely,Bernie Maddoff
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766583</id>
	<title>Re:Read the damn EULA</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1255686000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you agree with the recent moves of the government to take away all and every freedom from the people, under the disguise of "protecting your freedom"? ^^</p><p>Or how many people do you know who "care enough to understand what having and protecting that right means"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you agree with the recent moves of the government to take away all and every freedom from the people , under the disguise of " protecting your freedom " ?
^ ^ Or how many people do you know who " care enough to understand what having and protecting that right means " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you agree with the recent moves of the government to take away all and every freedom from the people, under the disguise of "protecting your freedom"?
^^Or how many people do you know who "care enough to understand what having and protecting that right means"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762669</id>
	<title>Re:deception psychology experiment waiver</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255601880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That kind of clause is necessary for a lot of good science...can't do proper medical trials without a placebo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That kind of clause is necessary for a lot of good science...ca n't do proper medical trials without a placebo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That kind of clause is necessary for a lot of good science...can't do proper medical trials without a placebo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763909</id>
	<title>Re:Scared?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255608360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't worry, you'll wake up with a dead hooker in a hotel room soon enough. All for the sake of advertisement of course.</p><p>(Big surprise that the CAD comic about this isn't in a 100 posts already)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry , you 'll wake up with a dead hooker in a hotel room soon enough .
All for the sake of advertisement of course .
( Big surprise that the CAD comic about this is n't in a 100 posts already )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry, you'll wake up with a dead hooker in a hotel room soon enough.
All for the sake of advertisement of course.
(Big surprise that the CAD comic about this isn't in a 100 posts already)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29775515</id>
	<title>Don't really care...</title>
	<author>uuddlrlrab</author>
	<datestamp>1255712100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...which way you try to slice it, this was in really bad taste.
<br> <br>
Even if the agreement somehow allows them to legally wriggle out of this, what kind of schmuck dreams up a "marketing" campaign like this? You'd have to be really far over the cuckoo's nest when, in the brainstorming process for adverts about a new car model, simulating a stalker comes to mind. I forsee shoe companies promoting new lineups by sending out realistic-seeming notices from food companies, or the FDA, that something the person bought may have been contaminated with potentially lethal doses of botulinum...</htmltext>
<tokenext>...which way you try to slice it , this was in really bad taste .
Even if the agreement somehow allows them to legally wriggle out of this , what kind of schmuck dreams up a " marketing " campaign like this ?
You 'd have to be really far over the cuckoo 's nest when , in the brainstorming process for adverts about a new car model , simulating a stalker comes to mind .
I forsee shoe companies promoting new lineups by sending out realistic-seeming notices from food companies , or the FDA , that something the person bought may have been contaminated with potentially lethal doses of botulinum.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...which way you try to slice it, this was in really bad taste.
Even if the agreement somehow allows them to legally wriggle out of this, what kind of schmuck dreams up a "marketing" campaign like this?
You'd have to be really far over the cuckoo's nest when, in the brainstorming process for adverts about a new car model, simulating a stalker comes to mind.
I forsee shoe companies promoting new lineups by sending out realistic-seeming notices from food companies, or the FDA, that something the person bought may have been contaminated with potentially lethal doses of botulinum...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29774445</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255697940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I'd be in jail </i> </p><p>Exactly. Why doesn't Slashdot have a cravengraspingduplicitousbastards tag?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be in jail Exactly .
Why does n't Slashdot have a cravengraspingduplicitousbastards tag ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd be in jail  Exactly.
Why doesn't Slashdot have a cravengraspingduplicitousbastards tag?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29768631</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>magus\_melchior</author>
	<datestamp>1255708020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you know business-level Japanese (and take it from a guy who sacrificed over a decade of Saturdays to learn Japanese in a dedicated school-- it's <b>HARD</b>), try to get a statement to Toyota's central office in Japan. If they ignore you (which is likely), take it to the pack of ravenous wolves-- er, the Japanese news media.</p><p>Two things work in our favor here: First, Japanese companies, like all Asians, love prestige, and will do somersaults* if it meant that you will think better of them. Toyota is hardly an exception here, as they hype the hell out of their Prius to gain eco cred. Second, Japanese news media is somewhat modeled after the British rags, in that they are by no means the docile bobble-heads that comprise the US press corps-- they are aggressive and ruthless. This means that if this story ended up in the Japanese press, it will cause enough of a furor to send execs over here to demand what the hell these idiots did.</p><p>* There was a <i>Salaryman NEO</i> sketch poking fun at the depth of bowing increasing proportionately to the authority of the person being bowed to; Prime Minister was a full forward somersault.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you know business-level Japanese ( and take it from a guy who sacrificed over a decade of Saturdays to learn Japanese in a dedicated school-- it 's HARD ) , try to get a statement to Toyota 's central office in Japan .
If they ignore you ( which is likely ) , take it to the pack of ravenous wolves-- er , the Japanese news media.Two things work in our favor here : First , Japanese companies , like all Asians , love prestige , and will do somersaults * if it meant that you will think better of them .
Toyota is hardly an exception here , as they hype the hell out of their Prius to gain eco cred .
Second , Japanese news media is somewhat modeled after the British rags , in that they are by no means the docile bobble-heads that comprise the US press corps-- they are aggressive and ruthless .
This means that if this story ended up in the Japanese press , it will cause enough of a furor to send execs over here to demand what the hell these idiots did .
* There was a Salaryman NEO sketch poking fun at the depth of bowing increasing proportionately to the authority of the person being bowed to ; Prime Minister was a full forward somersault .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you know business-level Japanese (and take it from a guy who sacrificed over a decade of Saturdays to learn Japanese in a dedicated school-- it's HARD), try to get a statement to Toyota's central office in Japan.
If they ignore you (which is likely), take it to the pack of ravenous wolves-- er, the Japanese news media.Two things work in our favor here: First, Japanese companies, like all Asians, love prestige, and will do somersaults* if it meant that you will think better of them.
Toyota is hardly an exception here, as they hype the hell out of their Prius to gain eco cred.
Second, Japanese news media is somewhat modeled after the British rags, in that they are by no means the docile bobble-heads that comprise the US press corps-- they are aggressive and ruthless.
This means that if this story ended up in the Japanese press, it will cause enough of a furor to send execs over here to demand what the hell these idiots did.
* There was a Salaryman NEO sketch poking fun at the depth of bowing increasing proportionately to the authority of the person being bowed to; Prime Minister was a full forward somersault.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763375</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764889</id>
	<title>You could say that...</title>
	<author>incognito84</author>
	<datestamp>1255616340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You could say that Toyota doesn't always have the best... Handling...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You could say that Toyota does n't always have the best... Handling.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could say that Toyota doesn't always have the best... Handling...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766285</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255723800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and the sad capitalist truth is that is the only reason they would ever behave themselves. If killing random homeless people helped their bottom line, they'd have lobbyists pushing to make it legal while they start killing anyway. We are fucked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and the sad capitalist truth is that is the only reason they would ever behave themselves .
If killing random homeless people helped their bottom line , they 'd have lobbyists pushing to make it legal while they start killing anyway .
We are fucked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and the sad capitalist truth is that is the only reason they would ever behave themselves.
If killing random homeless people helped their bottom line, they'd have lobbyists pushing to make it legal while they start killing anyway.
We are fucked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763375</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762209</id>
	<title>Re:Opted In</title>
	<author>bcmm</author>
	<datestamp>1255600380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It seems that it was just a general "receive spam from us" opt-in. Toyota apparently believes that if you give somebody your number, you're asking for them to stalk you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems that it was just a general " receive spam from us " opt-in .
Toyota apparently believes that if you give somebody your number , you 're asking for them to stalk you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems that it was just a general "receive spam from us" opt-in.
Toyota apparently believes that if you give somebody your number, you're asking for them to stalk you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762083</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767445</id>
	<title>Nissan vid</title>
	<author>MorbidNTT</author>
	<datestamp>1255700100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://current.com/items/88972773\_toyota-matrix-your-other-you-example.htm" title="current.com" rel="nofollow">video</a> [current.com]



<a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2009/09/30/Woman\_Says\_Saatchi\_&amp;\_Saatchi\_and\_Toyota\_Terrorized\_Her\_With\_Emails.htm" title="courthousenews.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.courthousenews.com</a> [courthousenews.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>video [ current.com ] http : //www.courthousenews.com [ courthousenews.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>video [current.com]



http://www.courthousenews.com [courthousenews.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763655</id>
	<title>Re:Read the damn EULA</title>
	<author>nextekcarl</author>
	<datestamp>1255606800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As long as it is only dry-humping, I'm cool with that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as it is only dry-humping , I 'm cool with that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as it is only dry-humping, I'm cool with that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764909</id>
	<title>If you want to contact Toyota</title>
	<author>rlh100</author>
	<datestamp>1255616580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can sent them email at:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://toyota.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/toyota.cfg/php/enduser/ask\_intercept.php" title="custhelp.com" rel="nofollow">http://toyota.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/toyota.cfg/php/enduser/ask\_intercept.php</a> [custhelp.com]</p><p>You might want to tell them that you are opting out of any of their marketing campaigns.</p><p>What were they thinking?</p><p>RLH</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can sent them email at :         http : //toyota.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/toyota.cfg/php/enduser/ask \ _intercept.php [ custhelp.com ] You might want to tell them that you are opting out of any of their marketing campaigns.What were they thinking ? RLH</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can sent them email at:
        http://toyota.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/toyota.cfg/php/enduser/ask\_intercept.php [custhelp.com]You might want to tell them that you are opting out of any of their marketing campaigns.What were they thinking?RLH</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763339</id>
	<title>How does this happen?</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1255605060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Grown adults with college degrees sat around in meetings and agreed to this. They thought it was a good idea. It must have been a somewhat long process- coming up with the concept, refining it, composing the threatening emails, foraging for opt-ins, getting the emails sent- and in all that time these university enhanced creatures thought it was all just tickety-boo.</p><p>I dunno. My head hurts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Grown adults with college degrees sat around in meetings and agreed to this .
They thought it was a good idea .
It must have been a somewhat long process- coming up with the concept , refining it , composing the threatening emails , foraging for opt-ins , getting the emails sent- and in all that time these university enhanced creatures thought it was all just tickety-boo.I dunno .
My head hurts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Grown adults with college degrees sat around in meetings and agreed to this.
They thought it was a good idea.
It must have been a somewhat long process- coming up with the concept, refining it, composing the threatening emails, foraging for opt-ins, getting the emails sent- and in all that time these university enhanced creatures thought it was all just tickety-boo.I dunno.
My head hurts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29771063</id>
	<title>Re:Advertising these days...</title>
	<author>dnahelicase</author>
	<datestamp>1255720020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If she was not supposed to be the target of the ad, but a tool used to implement the ad so that her friends would buy a car, then I am going to assume that she has done work for the advertising agency in assisting with the campaign.  She agreed to do it without realizing it, but I bet they didn't tell her that she wasn't going to be paid for work she was doing.  It looked like she held up her end of the deal flawlessly.  She couldn't even work and slept with weapons!  Now they simply need to pay her the previously not-disagreed to price of 10 million dollars.  I bet her performance was probably more believable than several other actors I've seen who make a lot more money than that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If she was not supposed to be the target of the ad , but a tool used to implement the ad so that her friends would buy a car , then I am going to assume that she has done work for the advertising agency in assisting with the campaign .
She agreed to do it without realizing it , but I bet they did n't tell her that she was n't going to be paid for work she was doing .
It looked like she held up her end of the deal flawlessly .
She could n't even work and slept with weapons !
Now they simply need to pay her the previously not-disagreed to price of 10 million dollars .
I bet her performance was probably more believable than several other actors I 've seen who make a lot more money than that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If she was not supposed to be the target of the ad, but a tool used to implement the ad so that her friends would buy a car, then I am going to assume that she has done work for the advertising agency in assisting with the campaign.
She agreed to do it without realizing it, but I bet they didn't tell her that she wasn't going to be paid for work she was doing.
It looked like she held up her end of the deal flawlessly.
She couldn't even work and slept with weapons!
Now they simply need to pay her the previously not-disagreed to price of 10 million dollars.
I bet her performance was probably more believable than several other actors I've seen who make a lot more money than that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763845</id>
	<title>Re:Read the damn EULA</title>
	<author>yurtinus</author>
	<datestamp>1255608060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Crap... that means I'm going to need to tape a EULA to my dog to indemnify me if during an attempted dry humping she bites their face off...
<br> <br>
GOD contract law is a pain in the ass.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Crap... that means I 'm going to need to tape a EULA to my dog to indemnify me if during an attempted dry humping she bites their face off.. . GOD contract law is a pain in the ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Crap... that means I'm going to need to tape a EULA to my dog to indemnify me if during an attempted dry humping she bites their face off...
 
GOD contract law is a pain in the ass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765545</id>
	<title>Something's Missing</title>
	<author>Pherlin</author>
	<datestamp>1255624140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I feel there is a much larger, larger issue at hand that needs to be brought up.

Toyota sucks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel there is a much larger , larger issue at hand that needs to be brought up .
Toyota sucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel there is a much larger, larger issue at hand that needs to be brought up.
Toyota sucks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29768129</id>
	<title>No right...</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1255705260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Absolutely not...even if I give you permission to contact me by email to send me your psam for what deals you have, that does not give you the right to send me a nasty email sounding like a stalker, where you can say pretty disturbing things, all in the name of fun...? NO WAY</p><p>I hope they get their asses handed to them in court, they need to be held accountable, yet a free speech activist writing about certain stories within the world events, will be told he has to take his story down because it does not shine positively in the name of scientology (or whatever that story was...). Someone was offended by a story telling the truth about this lame brain religion trying to goat people into believing they were visited by aliens, and they get told they are responsible for what they write, yet Toyota gets permission to send you an email, says they will rape your mother and kill your children unless you buy a car, and then at the end remind<br>you at the end that you subscribed to this....seriously???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Absolutely not...even if I give you permission to contact me by email to send me your psam for what deals you have , that does not give you the right to send me a nasty email sounding like a stalker , where you can say pretty disturbing things , all in the name of fun... ?
NO WAYI hope they get their asses handed to them in court , they need to be held accountable , yet a free speech activist writing about certain stories within the world events , will be told he has to take his story down because it does not shine positively in the name of scientology ( or whatever that story was... ) .
Someone was offended by a story telling the truth about this lame brain religion trying to goat people into believing they were visited by aliens , and they get told they are responsible for what they write , yet Toyota gets permission to send you an email , says they will rape your mother and kill your children unless you buy a car , and then at the end remindyou at the end that you subscribed to this....seriously ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Absolutely not...even if I give you permission to contact me by email to send me your psam for what deals you have, that does not give you the right to send me a nasty email sounding like a stalker, where you can say pretty disturbing things, all in the name of fun...?
NO WAYI hope they get their asses handed to them in court, they need to be held accountable, yet a free speech activist writing about certain stories within the world events, will be told he has to take his story down because it does not shine positively in the name of scientology (or whatever that story was...).
Someone was offended by a story telling the truth about this lame brain religion trying to goat people into believing they were visited by aliens, and they get told they are responsible for what they write, yet Toyota gets permission to send you an email, says they will rape your mother and kill your children unless you buy a car, and then at the end remindyou at the end that you subscribed to this....seriously??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766009</id>
	<title>Re:Possible CAN SPAM implications</title>
	<author>martyros</author>
	<datestamp>1255631280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Unless they got really creative with the opt-in...</p></div></blockquote><p>That's exactly what happened.  She didn't purposely sign up to be stalked.  One of her friends signed her up.  To get her to "opt-in", she was sent an online quiz, and as part of the quiz she "signed" an EULA opting in to the "marketing campaign".
</p><p>Her lawyer's point is that she didn't realize she was opting into being stalked; she thought she was opting in to take a stupid online quiz.  You can't pretend that signing the thing is "informed consent", when the whole point of the quiz was to hide the fact that you were about to sign up for this "marketing campaign".
</p><p>I think <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1406387&amp;cid=29762167" title="slashdot.org">this comment</a> [slashdot.org] demonstrates the principle pretty well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless they got really creative with the opt-in...That 's exactly what happened .
She did n't purposely sign up to be stalked .
One of her friends signed her up .
To get her to " opt-in " , she was sent an online quiz , and as part of the quiz she " signed " an EULA opting in to the " marketing campaign " .
Her lawyer 's point is that she did n't realize she was opting into being stalked ; she thought she was opting in to take a stupid online quiz .
You ca n't pretend that signing the thing is " informed consent " , when the whole point of the quiz was to hide the fact that you were about to sign up for this " marketing campaign " .
I think this comment [ slashdot.org ] demonstrates the principle pretty well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless they got really creative with the opt-in...That's exactly what happened.
She didn't purposely sign up to be stalked.
One of her friends signed her up.
To get her to "opt-in", she was sent an online quiz, and as part of the quiz she "signed" an EULA opting in to the "marketing campaign".
Her lawyer's point is that she didn't realize she was opting into being stalked; she thought she was opting in to take a stupid online quiz.
You can't pretend that signing the thing is "informed consent", when the whole point of the quiz was to hide the fact that you were about to sign up for this "marketing campaign".
I think this comment [slashdot.org] demonstrates the principle pretty well.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762269</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29768195</id>
	<title>Re:Props to Toyota as long as the Formula holds tr</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1255705620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What marketers don't seem to understand is that if you piss me off, I'm not likely to buy your product. Read the comments in this thread, it appears that stalking this woman cost Toyota a few slashdotters, but I don't see on that says this ad might get them to buy one.</p><p>Epic stupidity. With corporations all seemingly being run by complete and total idiots, is it any wonder the world's economy is in the shitter?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What marketers do n't seem to understand is that if you piss me off , I 'm not likely to buy your product .
Read the comments in this thread , it appears that stalking this woman cost Toyota a few slashdotters , but I do n't see on that says this ad might get them to buy one.Epic stupidity .
With corporations all seemingly being run by complete and total idiots , is it any wonder the world 's economy is in the shitter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What marketers don't seem to understand is that if you piss me off, I'm not likely to buy your product.
Read the comments in this thread, it appears that stalking this woman cost Toyota a few slashdotters, but I don't see on that says this ad might get them to buy one.Epic stupidity.
With corporations all seemingly being run by complete and total idiots, is it any wonder the world's economy is in the shitter?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762343</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762903</id>
	<title>Re:Props to Toyota as long as the Formula holds tr</title>
	<author>RightSaidFred99</author>
	<datestamp>1255602780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Meh.  "Any publicity is good publicity" is simply not true.  It can be true if you're not widely known, as it gets name recognition out there.  See e.g. reality TV "stars".  But for a large multinational corporation that almost everyone already knows it's just that - bad publicity.</p><p>They really need to rewrite some of these old sayings people take for granted.  Another one is that "the victor writes the histories".  Yeah - not anymore.  Teh Interwebs pretty much ruined that idea, and it's fairly easy to point to some incidents that happened 50-60 years ago where someone clearly tried to whitewash history but the facts are plain as could be for anyone willing to spend 20 minutes googling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Meh .
" Any publicity is good publicity " is simply not true .
It can be true if you 're not widely known , as it gets name recognition out there .
See e.g .
reality TV " stars " .
But for a large multinational corporation that almost everyone already knows it 's just that - bad publicity.They really need to rewrite some of these old sayings people take for granted .
Another one is that " the victor writes the histories " .
Yeah - not anymore .
Teh Interwebs pretty much ruined that idea , and it 's fairly easy to point to some incidents that happened 50-60 years ago where someone clearly tried to whitewash history but the facts are plain as could be for anyone willing to spend 20 minutes googling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meh.
"Any publicity is good publicity" is simply not true.
It can be true if you're not widely known, as it gets name recognition out there.
See e.g.
reality TV "stars".
But for a large multinational corporation that almost everyone already knows it's just that - bad publicity.They really need to rewrite some of these old sayings people take for granted.
Another one is that "the victor writes the histories".
Yeah - not anymore.
Teh Interwebs pretty much ruined that idea, and it's fairly easy to point to some incidents that happened 50-60 years ago where someone clearly tried to whitewash history but the facts are plain as could be for anyone willing to spend 20 minutes googling.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762343</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762729</id>
	<title>Re:Scared?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255602060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>maybe, but Toyota overstepped a line, and it's her due right to try to make them accountable.</p><p>In the end, Toyota impersonated another person and royally overstepped the boundary of the agreement with her to send her marketing messages from Toyota.</p><p>Consider: If I grant access to my restricted private house to friend X, I can surely legally restrict that same person if he impersonates another person. According to the original agreement I must provide access to friend X, but I have no legal way to distinguish between friend X and what he impersonates, so I can clearly deny him access. The same holds for Toyota: they cannot impersonate the US President, the Police and waive this lawsuit away by saying that they had the right to send messages. While impersonating the Police is a felony (obviously), impersonating someone random immediately voids the e-mail agreement, since there is no way for the "victim" here to distinguish between them. (Toyota can send her messages, vs. Toyota impersonating a stalker).</p><p>IOW, this is in terrible bad taste. Toyota screwed up badly, and the law will likely be against them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>maybe , but Toyota overstepped a line , and it 's her due right to try to make them accountable.In the end , Toyota impersonated another person and royally overstepped the boundary of the agreement with her to send her marketing messages from Toyota.Consider : If I grant access to my restricted private house to friend X , I can surely legally restrict that same person if he impersonates another person .
According to the original agreement I must provide access to friend X , but I have no legal way to distinguish between friend X and what he impersonates , so I can clearly deny him access .
The same holds for Toyota : they can not impersonate the US President , the Police and waive this lawsuit away by saying that they had the right to send messages .
While impersonating the Police is a felony ( obviously ) , impersonating someone random immediately voids the e-mail agreement , since there is no way for the " victim " here to distinguish between them .
( Toyota can send her messages , vs. Toyota impersonating a stalker ) .IOW , this is in terrible bad taste .
Toyota screwed up badly , and the law will likely be against them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>maybe, but Toyota overstepped a line, and it's her due right to try to make them accountable.In the end, Toyota impersonated another person and royally overstepped the boundary of the agreement with her to send her marketing messages from Toyota.Consider: If I grant access to my restricted private house to friend X, I can surely legally restrict that same person if he impersonates another person.
According to the original agreement I must provide access to friend X, but I have no legal way to distinguish between friend X and what he impersonates, so I can clearly deny him access.
The same holds for Toyota: they cannot impersonate the US President, the Police and waive this lawsuit away by saying that they had the right to send messages.
While impersonating the Police is a felony (obviously), impersonating someone random immediately voids the e-mail agreement, since there is no way for the "victim" here to distinguish between them.
(Toyota can send her messages, vs. Toyota impersonating a stalker).IOW, this is in terrible bad taste.
Toyota screwed up badly, and the law will likely be against them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762479</id>
	<title>The Game</title>
	<author>IorDMUX</author>
	<datestamp>1255601220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reading things like this, I am often reminded of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Game\_(film)" title="wikipedia.org">The Game</a> [wikipedia.org], though the film describes an 'interaction' which is on a totally different level than these e-mails and faux web pages.  <br> <br>... I always wondered what the legal consequences would have been of a Game<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... er... "gone bad".  What protection does the law provide for a person who signs an endless legalese document without reading it, thus opting in to something well over their heads?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reading things like this , I am often reminded of The Game [ wikipedia.org ] , though the film describes an 'interaction ' which is on a totally different level than these e-mails and faux web pages .
... I always wondered what the legal consequences would have been of a Game ... er... " gone bad " .
What protection does the law provide for a person who signs an endless legalese document without reading it , thus opting in to something well over their heads ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reading things like this, I am often reminded of The Game [wikipedia.org], though the film describes an 'interaction' which is on a totally different level than these e-mails and faux web pages.
... I always wondered what the legal consequences would have been of a Game ... er... "gone bad".
What protection does the law provide for a person who signs an endless legalese document without reading it, thus opting in to something well over their heads?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767303</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255698480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Would that be the Honda <i>Fit</i>?  It's a small, 5-door competitor to the Toyota Matrix which outperforms it in all customer satisfaction metrics, as well as fuel efficiency and crash safety.  Plus, instead of steel, it's made of chocolate.  Delicious AND biodegradable.</p></div><p>Are you stalking me?<br>You'll be hearing from my attorney momentarily.  I expect ONE MILLION DOLLARS for my sleeplessness and poor work performance (etc.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would that be the Honda Fit ?
It 's a small , 5-door competitor to the Toyota Matrix which outperforms it in all customer satisfaction metrics , as well as fuel efficiency and crash safety .
Plus , instead of steel , it 's made of chocolate .
Delicious AND biodegradable.Are you stalking me ? You 'll be hearing from my attorney momentarily .
I expect ONE MILLION DOLLARS for my sleeplessness and poor work performance ( etc .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would that be the Honda Fit?
It's a small, 5-door competitor to the Toyota Matrix which outperforms it in all customer satisfaction metrics, as well as fuel efficiency and crash safety.
Plus, instead of steel, it's made of chocolate.
Delicious AND biodegradable.Are you stalking me?You'll be hearing from my attorney momentarily.
I expect ONE MILLION DOLLARS for my sleeplessness and poor work performance (etc.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762917</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762681</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255601940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, I don't like it either. But unfortunately, to them either good or bad publicity IS publicity. <br>"There you go Toyota, you have a front page article on ABC News and Slashdot." <br> <br>
I'm not pretty sure how it'll work out, but I'm positive someone is going to find a good opportunity from this other than the distressed woman.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I do n't like it either .
But unfortunately , to them either good or bad publicity IS publicity .
" There you go Toyota , you have a front page article on ABC News and Slashdot .
" I 'm not pretty sure how it 'll work out , but I 'm positive someone is going to find a good opportunity from this other than the distressed woman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I don't like it either.
But unfortunately, to them either good or bad publicity IS publicity.
"There you go Toyota, you have a front page article on ABC News and Slashdot.
"  
I'm not pretty sure how it'll work out, but I'm positive someone is going to find a good opportunity from this other than the distressed woman.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762937</id>
	<title>Re:So it was okay because it was fake?</title>
	<author>bennomatic</author>
	<datestamp>1255602960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reminds me of that line from Trainspotting: How the !@#!@ can it be armed robbery when the @#@$ing gun isn't even loaded?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of that line from Trainspotting : How the ! @ # !
@ can it be armed robbery when the @ # @ $ ing gun is n't even loaded ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of that line from Trainspotting: How the !@#!
@ can it be armed robbery when the @#@$ing gun isn't even loaded?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762357</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29770621</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>Acer500</author>
	<datestamp>1255717740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p> I was leaning toward a small Honda anyway</p></div><p>Would that be the Honda <i>Fit</i>?  It's a small, 5-door competitor to the Toyota Matrix which outperforms it in all customer satisfaction metrics, as well as fuel efficiency and crash safety.</p>  </div><p>The Fit is actually a rather nice car (my father owns one).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was leaning toward a small Honda anywayWould that be the Honda Fit ?
It 's a small , 5-door competitor to the Toyota Matrix which outperforms it in all customer satisfaction metrics , as well as fuel efficiency and crash safety .
The Fit is actually a rather nice car ( my father owns one ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I was leaning toward a small Honda anywayWould that be the Honda Fit?
It's a small, 5-door competitor to the Toyota Matrix which outperforms it in all customer satisfaction metrics, as well as fuel efficiency and crash safety.
The Fit is actually a rather nice car (my father owns one).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762917</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766599</id>
	<title>Clarification on the campain</title>
	<author>abigsmurf</author>
	<datestamp>1255686300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've actually found out details of what the campaign involved.
<br> <br>
It is designed as a prank to pull on someone else. What happens is you gave the email of someone you want to prank and it sent them a fake personality where they'd fill out their personal details and give consent to receive further emails.
<br> <br>
You were then sent a schedule (or one was presented before you agreed to prank them) of exactly what they would receive.
<br> <br>
This is not nearly as sinister as the money grabbing woman filing the lawsuit made out to be. Not only does it require someone you know to initially set up the prank, it describes the nature of the prank to whoever sets it up and, through the fake survey, it ensures that you have to actively take action for it to start and you are unlikely to be targetted by strangers.
<br> <br>
If you sue anyone, sue the friend who not only started the prank, but didn't tell you about it when you were apparently being so traumatised.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've actually found out details of what the campaign involved .
It is designed as a prank to pull on someone else .
What happens is you gave the email of someone you want to prank and it sent them a fake personality where they 'd fill out their personal details and give consent to receive further emails .
You were then sent a schedule ( or one was presented before you agreed to prank them ) of exactly what they would receive .
This is not nearly as sinister as the money grabbing woman filing the lawsuit made out to be .
Not only does it require someone you know to initially set up the prank , it describes the nature of the prank to whoever sets it up and , through the fake survey , it ensures that you have to actively take action for it to start and you are unlikely to be targetted by strangers .
If you sue anyone , sue the friend who not only started the prank , but did n't tell you about it when you were apparently being so traumatised .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've actually found out details of what the campaign involved.
It is designed as a prank to pull on someone else.
What happens is you gave the email of someone you want to prank and it sent them a fake personality where they'd fill out their personal details and give consent to receive further emails.
You were then sent a schedule (or one was presented before you agreed to prank them) of exactly what they would receive.
This is not nearly as sinister as the money grabbing woman filing the lawsuit made out to be.
Not only does it require someone you know to initially set up the prank, it describes the nature of the prank to whoever sets it up and, through the fake survey, it ensures that you have to actively take action for it to start and you are unlikely to be targetted by strangers.
If you sue anyone, sue the friend who not only started the prank, but didn't tell you about it when you were apparently being so traumatised.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763011</id>
	<title>It's not Toyota's Fault...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255603320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Her friend entered the victims email. Toyota merely followed a bad advertising scheme. They were trying to pull a prank. The victims Friend is the one who gave out the email, so if anyone should get sued, its her friend.</p><p>If I have your email address and I sign you up for bestiality, are you going to sue zootube?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Her friend entered the victims email .
Toyota merely followed a bad advertising scheme .
They were trying to pull a prank .
The victims Friend is the one who gave out the email , so if anyone should get sued , its her friend.If I have your email address and I sign you up for bestiality , are you going to sue zootube ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Her friend entered the victims email.
Toyota merely followed a bad advertising scheme.
They were trying to pull a prank.
The victims Friend is the one who gave out the email, so if anyone should get sued, its her friend.If I have your email address and I sign you up for bestiality, are you going to sue zootube?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762223</id>
	<title>Re:Opted In</title>
	<author>captainbeardo</author>
	<datestamp>1255600440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Me too! Anything to get $250 of that sweet Yaris I've had my eye on down at the dealership.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Me too !
Anything to get $ 250 of that sweet Yaris I 've had my eye on down at the dealership .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Me too!
Anything to get $250 of that sweet Yaris I've had my eye on down at the dealership.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762083</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762621</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>Interoperable</author>
	<datestamp>1255601700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think Toyota should be issued a restraining order to never contact this person again. Next time a flyer with a Toyota ad in it arrives at her door...jail time for the execs.</p><p>Seriously though, people in the company need to be held personally accountable. As you pointed out, litigation clearly isn't effective to prevent companies from doing things like this.</p><p>The Toyota and Saatchi marketing directors really should be dealt with as if they had stalked this woman. Similarly, those responsible for IKEA's "let's spray paint 'this space could be beautiful' on public and private property" campaign should be formally charged with vandalism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Toyota should be issued a restraining order to never contact this person again .
Next time a flyer with a Toyota ad in it arrives at her door...jail time for the execs.Seriously though , people in the company need to be held personally accountable .
As you pointed out , litigation clearly is n't effective to prevent companies from doing things like this.The Toyota and Saatchi marketing directors really should be dealt with as if they had stalked this woman .
Similarly , those responsible for IKEA 's " let 's spray paint 'this space could be beautiful ' on public and private property " campaign should be formally charged with vandalism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Toyota should be issued a restraining order to never contact this person again.
Next time a flyer with a Toyota ad in it arrives at her door...jail time for the execs.Seriously though, people in the company need to be held personally accountable.
As you pointed out, litigation clearly isn't effective to prevent companies from doing things like this.The Toyota and Saatchi marketing directors really should be dealt with as if they had stalked this woman.
Similarly, those responsible for IKEA's "let's spray paint 'this space could be beautiful' on public and private property" campaign should be formally charged with vandalism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765127</id>
	<title>Re:Read the damn EULA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255618740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>woooosh......</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>woooosh..... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>woooosh......</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765081</id>
	<title>Re:The Game</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255618080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shit. I just lost, asshole.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shit .
I just lost , asshole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shit.
I just lost, asshole.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762479</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763375</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255605240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is such a thing as bad publicity, and you can very easily help end this.</p><p>Call your local dealerships and tell them that though you're a loyal Toyota customer, as a result of the Amber Duick situation and the way corporate has pretended there's nothing wrong with the situation, you apologize, but you cannot in good conscience remain a Toyota customer.  Be polite, and be prepared to explain and to provide reference.</p><p>Then call Toyota and do the same.  Toyota's toll free is 800-331-4331, and extension 5 is specifically dedicated to telling Toyota about experiences you've had with their company.</p><p>Tie up each call with "if Toyota were to publically apologize, release Saatchi and Saatchi from advertising and release Chad Harp from spokesmanship, I would be able to believe that this was a temporary oversight.  As long as the company and individual who allowed this to happen retain their positions, I must conclude that Toyota believes that fake stalking by a man on the run from the law claiming to be ready to show up at the customer's home is an appropriate marketing behavior, and I cannot do business with you again."</p><p>Ask that the dealerships contact corporate and explain that they're losing customers as a result of Toyota believing that it's appropriate to pretend to stalk their customers.</p><p>They'll listen if they think their bottom line is at risk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is such a thing as bad publicity , and you can very easily help end this.Call your local dealerships and tell them that though you 're a loyal Toyota customer , as a result of the Amber Duick situation and the way corporate has pretended there 's nothing wrong with the situation , you apologize , but you can not in good conscience remain a Toyota customer .
Be polite , and be prepared to explain and to provide reference.Then call Toyota and do the same .
Toyota 's toll free is 800-331-4331 , and extension 5 is specifically dedicated to telling Toyota about experiences you 've had with their company.Tie up each call with " if Toyota were to publically apologize , release Saatchi and Saatchi from advertising and release Chad Harp from spokesmanship , I would be able to believe that this was a temporary oversight .
As long as the company and individual who allowed this to happen retain their positions , I must conclude that Toyota believes that fake stalking by a man on the run from the law claiming to be ready to show up at the customer 's home is an appropriate marketing behavior , and I can not do business with you again .
" Ask that the dealerships contact corporate and explain that they 're losing customers as a result of Toyota believing that it 's appropriate to pretend to stalk their customers.They 'll listen if they think their bottom line is at risk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is such a thing as bad publicity, and you can very easily help end this.Call your local dealerships and tell them that though you're a loyal Toyota customer, as a result of the Amber Duick situation and the way corporate has pretended there's nothing wrong with the situation, you apologize, but you cannot in good conscience remain a Toyota customer.
Be polite, and be prepared to explain and to provide reference.Then call Toyota and do the same.
Toyota's toll free is 800-331-4331, and extension 5 is specifically dedicated to telling Toyota about experiences you've had with their company.Tie up each call with "if Toyota were to publically apologize, release Saatchi and Saatchi from advertising and release Chad Harp from spokesmanship, I would be able to believe that this was a temporary oversight.
As long as the company and individual who allowed this to happen retain their positions, I must conclude that Toyota believes that fake stalking by a man on the run from the law claiming to be ready to show up at the customer's home is an appropriate marketing behavior, and I cannot do business with you again.
"Ask that the dealerships contact corporate and explain that they're losing customers as a result of Toyota believing that it's appropriate to pretend to stalk their customers.They'll listen if they think their bottom line is at risk.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762151</id>
	<title>Is this for real?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255600140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or am I swept up in an extremely elaborate episode of Punked?</p><p>Its really getting to the point that I can't tell anymore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or am I swept up in an extremely elaborate episode of Punked ? Its really getting to the point that I ca n't tell anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or am I swept up in an extremely elaborate episode of Punked?Its really getting to the point that I can't tell anymore.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766537</id>
	<title>Death threat as scam</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1255685160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sadly the 'death threat' I received via email wasn't some kind of advertisement and merely an attempt to scam me out of money:</p><blockquote><div><p>Look here you bastard. You think i have time for this your stupid talk, i just<br>inform you that some one paid me to kill you and you are<br>here talking no sence to me. this is like the same warning pass on to the<br>america government when they ignore it and it became and ignorance to<br>them, and this is the same warning also pass to the most polular MUSICIAN WHO<br>WAS SHORT DEAD IN SOUTH AFRICA. am  also passing this<br>warning to you so if you want to ignore it then you too will face in  hell and<br>join the devil.</p><p>If you do not comply and cooperate with me in your reply to this email, you<br>will leave me no option as to instruct my Boys to get you shot, for your<br>informations you are to Pay the sum of $3,500 Usd to live your life as a free<br>Citizen, but if you ignore.... As a matter of fact the person whom insructed me<br>to get you killed is waiting for your Funeral news.</p><p><a href="http://www.fbi.gov/terrorinfo/top.htm" title="fbi.gov">http://www.fbi.gov/terrorinfo/top.htm</a> [fbi.gov]<br><a href="http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=noordin\_mohammed\_top\_1" title="historycommons.org">http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=noordin\_mohammed\_top\_1</a> [historycommons.org]</p><p>Noordin Mohammed.</p></div></blockquote><p>Oddly enough that email cheered me up when I received it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly the 'death threat ' I received via email was n't some kind of advertisement and merely an attempt to scam me out of money : Look here you bastard .
You think i have time for this your stupid talk , i justinform you that some one paid me to kill you and you arehere talking no sence to me .
this is like the same warning pass on to theamerica government when they ignore it and it became and ignorance tothem , and this is the same warning also pass to the most polular MUSICIAN WHOWAS SHORT DEAD IN SOUTH AFRICA .
am also passing thiswarning to you so if you want to ignore it then you too will face in hell andjoin the devil.If you do not comply and cooperate with me in your reply to this email , youwill leave me no option as to instruct my Boys to get you shot , for yourinformations you are to Pay the sum of $ 3,500 Usd to live your life as a freeCitizen , but if you ignore.... As a matter of fact the person whom insructed meto get you killed is waiting for your Funeral news.http : //www.fbi.gov/terrorinfo/top.htm [ fbi.gov ] http : //www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp ? entity = noordin \ _mohammed \ _top \ _1 [ historycommons.org ] Noordin Mohammed.Oddly enough that email cheered me up when I received it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly the 'death threat' I received via email wasn't some kind of advertisement and merely an attempt to scam me out of money:Look here you bastard.
You think i have time for this your stupid talk, i justinform you that some one paid me to kill you and you arehere talking no sence to me.
this is like the same warning pass on to theamerica government when they ignore it and it became and ignorance tothem, and this is the same warning also pass to the most polular MUSICIAN WHOWAS SHORT DEAD IN SOUTH AFRICA.
am  also passing thiswarning to you so if you want to ignore it then you too will face in  hell andjoin the devil.If you do not comply and cooperate with me in your reply to this email, youwill leave me no option as to instruct my Boys to get you shot, for yourinformations you are to Pay the sum of $3,500 Usd to live your life as a freeCitizen, but if you ignore.... As a matter of fact the person whom insructed meto get you killed is waiting for your Funeral news.http://www.fbi.gov/terrorinfo/top.htm [fbi.gov]http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=noordin\_mohammed\_top\_1 [historycommons.org]Noordin Mohammed.Oddly enough that email cheered me up when I received it.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767257</id>
	<title>Re:Their reply reminds me of a bank</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1255697760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A bank once told me that because I had signed approval for a single specific company to electronically debit my account, that the bank did not need to inform me WHO was debiting my account.</p> </div><p>Banks are held to fairly strict reporting standards, anything they have to report has to be recorded. Anything they don't have to report, they don't, because if they report it they have to follow certain standards. Once you [foolishly] sign that paper, you're ass out. Why do that shit anyway? Don't you have web bill pay?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A bank once told me that because I had signed approval for a single specific company to electronically debit my account , that the bank did not need to inform me WHO was debiting my account .
Banks are held to fairly strict reporting standards , anything they have to report has to be recorded .
Anything they do n't have to report , they do n't , because if they report it they have to follow certain standards .
Once you [ foolishly ] sign that paper , you 're ass out .
Why do that shit anyway ?
Do n't you have web bill pay ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A bank once told me that because I had signed approval for a single specific company to electronically debit my account, that the bank did not need to inform me WHO was debiting my account.
Banks are held to fairly strict reporting standards, anything they have to report has to be recorded.
Anything they don't have to report, they don't, because if they report it they have to follow certain standards.
Once you [foolishly] sign that paper, you're ass out.
Why do that shit anyway?
Don't you have web bill pay?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762705</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762731</id>
	<title>Re:Advertising these days...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255602060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It remainds me of a little book call'd Jennifer Government....</p><p>About a here-be-unnamed little evil corporation finishing off some customers to create some hype. We're not far from that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It remainds me of a little book call 'd Jennifer Government....About a here-be-unnamed little evil corporation finishing off some customers to create some hype .
We 're not far from that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It remainds me of a little book call'd Jennifer Government....About a here-be-unnamed little evil corporation finishing off some customers to create some hype.
We're not far from that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765689</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1255626360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to this logic, a marketing agency could print ads containing tons of incomphrensible, absolutely stupid gibberish and make a few <b>obvious</b> mentions of their target product...and have it be a great success. The only product that I know who advertises like this manufactures soap, and hardly popular soap at that.</p><p>I'm not a marketing expert, but I do know that even though this kind of advertising will bring the product up in conversation or as a passing of thought, it hardly converts to hard sales that mean something. If anything, a negative reaction to these ads could actually produce the completely opposite result!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to this logic , a marketing agency could print ads containing tons of incomphrensible , absolutely stupid gibberish and make a few obvious mentions of their target product...and have it be a great success .
The only product that I know who advertises like this manufactures soap , and hardly popular soap at that.I 'm not a marketing expert , but I do know that even though this kind of advertising will bring the product up in conversation or as a passing of thought , it hardly converts to hard sales that mean something .
If anything , a negative reaction to these ads could actually produce the completely opposite result !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to this logic, a marketing agency could print ads containing tons of incomphrensible, absolutely stupid gibberish and make a few obvious mentions of their target product...and have it be a great success.
The only product that I know who advertises like this manufactures soap, and hardly popular soap at that.I'm not a marketing expert, but I do know that even though this kind of advertising will bring the product up in conversation or as a passing of thought, it hardly converts to hard sales that mean something.
If anything, a negative reaction to these ads could actually produce the completely opposite result!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763159</id>
	<title>-1 possible customer</title>
	<author>djdevon3</author>
	<datestamp>1255603920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They'll never be able to sell her that matrix now...</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll never be able to sell her that matrix now.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll never be able to sell her that matrix now...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762449</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>nomadic</author>
	<datestamp>1255601160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Saatchi &amp; Saatchi? They'll probably get more business because the dipshit MBAs will think that "there's no such thing as bad publicity." </i>
<br>
<br>
The people in advertising firms make MBAs look well-grounded in reality by comparison.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Saatchi &amp; Saatchi ?
They 'll probably get more business because the dipshit MBAs will think that " there 's no such thing as bad publicity .
" The people in advertising firms make MBAs look well-grounded in reality by comparison .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Saatchi &amp; Saatchi?
They'll probably get more business because the dipshit MBAs will think that "there's no such thing as bad publicity.
" 


The people in advertising firms make MBAs look well-grounded in reality by comparison.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767787</id>
	<title>Overheard from a marketroid during the meeting</title>
	<author>Provocateur</author>
	<datestamp>1255702980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uhm, so *cough you're <i>not</i> getting a Toyota, then? Just checking...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uhm , so * cough you 're not getting a Toyota , then ?
Just checking.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uhm, so *cough you're not getting a Toyota, then?
Just checking...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762357</id>
	<title>So it was okay because it was fake?</title>
	<author>Megane</author>
	<datestamp>1255600860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Tell that to people who pull out a fake gun when robbing a bank, or when confronted by a cop.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tell that to people who pull out a fake gun when robbing a bank , or when confronted by a cop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tell that to people who pull out a fake gun when robbing a bank, or when confronted by a cop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762003</id>
	<title>Yep</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255599480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A <b>Los Angeles woman</b> is suing Toyota for <b>*$10 MILLION*</b> over a marketing campaign that she claims "punked" her into incorrectly believing she was being stalked.</p><p>She even made her longtime boyfriend sleep with a <b>club and mace next to the bed for protection</b>.</p></div><p>Yeah, you need $10 million to cover that. Only in USA.</p><p>This also makes me wonder; maybe she had something to hide because she got so scared?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A Los Angeles woman is suing Toyota for * $ 10 MILLION * over a marketing campaign that she claims " punked " her into incorrectly believing she was being stalked.She even made her longtime boyfriend sleep with a club and mace next to the bed for protection.Yeah , you need $ 10 million to cover that .
Only in USA.This also makes me wonder ; maybe she had something to hide because she got so scared ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A Los Angeles woman is suing Toyota for *$10 MILLION* over a marketing campaign that she claims "punked" her into incorrectly believing she was being stalked.She even made her longtime boyfriend sleep with a club and mace next to the bed for protection.Yeah, you need $10 million to cover that.
Only in USA.This also makes me wonder; maybe she had something to hide because she got so scared?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762083</id>
	<title>Opted In</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255599900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes! I'd like to receive death threats, disturbing messages, and other items of a stalking nature from Toyota Motor Corporation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes !
I 'd like to receive death threats , disturbing messages , and other items of a stalking nature from Toyota Motor Corporation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes!
I'd like to receive death threats, disturbing messages, and other items of a stalking nature from Toyota Motor Corporation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29770955</id>
	<title>Re:Possible CAN SPAM implications</title>
	<author>dnahelicase</author>
	<datestamp>1255719540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But did the messages say they were from Toyota in any real fashion, and give the option to opt-out?  If they did, then there's no issue, but if they didn't then I hope she gets every dime she wants.  "I'm running from the cops, I know where you live, and you're going to help me out - this message is from Toyota and click here to opt-out of future emails" wouldn't have terrified the crap out of her, but it would have been legal.  The guy running this campaign was that same kid from recess who used to run around saying "Loserthatwantstogethitsays what" and then complains because the other kids asked for it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But did the messages say they were from Toyota in any real fashion , and give the option to opt-out ?
If they did , then there 's no issue , but if they did n't then I hope she gets every dime she wants .
" I 'm running from the cops , I know where you live , and you 're going to help me out - this message is from Toyota and click here to opt-out of future emails " would n't have terrified the crap out of her , but it would have been legal .
The guy running this campaign was that same kid from recess who used to run around saying " Loserthatwantstogethitsays what " and then complains because the other kids asked for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But did the messages say they were from Toyota in any real fashion, and give the option to opt-out?
If they did, then there's no issue, but if they didn't then I hope she gets every dime she wants.
"I'm running from the cops, I know where you live, and you're going to help me out - this message is from Toyota and click here to opt-out of future emails" wouldn't have terrified the crap out of her, but it would have been legal.
The guy running this campaign was that same kid from recess who used to run around saying "Loserthatwantstogethitsays what" and then complains because the other kids asked for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766009</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763169</id>
	<title>Sooo...</title>
	<author>MrSenile</author>
	<datestamp>1255603980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>[Hypothetical Situation:]</p><p>I jokingly said to the Toyota person 'oh sure, you can send me threatening email, but then I get to come to your store in the middle of the night and slash all the tires of your vehicles'.  We both had a great laugh over it, shook hands, and we walked away.</p><p>2 death threats later, and Goodyear is having a wonderful fiscal year.</p><p>[/Hypothetical]</p><p>Somehow, I doubt Toyota would be as easily forgiving if the tables were reversed.  So why should this women have to cave in?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>[ Hypothetical Situation : ] I jokingly said to the Toyota person 'oh sure , you can send me threatening email , but then I get to come to your store in the middle of the night and slash all the tires of your vehicles' .
We both had a great laugh over it , shook hands , and we walked away.2 death threats later , and Goodyear is having a wonderful fiscal year .
[ /Hypothetical ] Somehow , I doubt Toyota would be as easily forgiving if the tables were reversed .
So why should this women have to cave in ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[Hypothetical Situation:]I jokingly said to the Toyota person 'oh sure, you can send me threatening email, but then I get to come to your store in the middle of the night and slash all the tires of your vehicles'.
We both had a great laugh over it, shook hands, and we walked away.2 death threats later, and Goodyear is having a wonderful fiscal year.
[/Hypothetical]Somehow, I doubt Toyota would be as easily forgiving if the tables were reversed.
So why should this women have to cave in?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767695</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand advertising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255702380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When you do need them, because something is wrong with their product, they let you talk to machines until you get fed up.</p></div><p>That is a very derogatory way of talking about our Indian and Chinese friends.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When you do need them , because something is wrong with their product , they let you talk to machines until you get fed up.That is a very derogatory way of talking about our Indian and Chinese friends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you do need them, because something is wrong with their product, they let you talk to machines until you get fed up.That is a very derogatory way of talking about our Indian and Chinese friends.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762853</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767533</id>
	<title>Re:Opted In</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255700940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am surprised nobody mentioned this... there was a game a while ago that was trying to do just this!</p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic\_\%28video\_game\%29</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am surprised nobody mentioned this... there was a game a while ago that was trying to do just this ! http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic \ _ \ % 28video \ _game \ % 29</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am surprised nobody mentioned this... there was a game a while ago that was trying to do just this!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic\_\%28video\_game\%29</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762083</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767013</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>Rick17JJ</author>
	<datestamp>1255693440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article said that "it had developed the campaign to target men under 35 who hate advertising." It also said that it "should gain the appreciation from even the most cynical, anti-advertising guy."<br><br>It definitely did not gain my appreciation, and I think of myself as being a cynical, anti-advertising guy. However, I am way over 35 years old, so I am not their targeted audience.<br><br>I pretty much ignore most commercials, automotive or otherwise. Instead, whenever I get ready to buy a car, I look at consumer reports and a few issues of car magazines. I also ask at least a couple of auto mechanics, what cars and engines are good or bad. I usually do that same type of research for almost any major hardware, computer or appliance purchase, instead of relying on what the ads say.<br><br>As a voter, I nearly always ignore campaign commercials, as being both useless brief sound bites and deliberately misleading statements.  Instead, I look at those free booklets which contain brief statements from every candidate and also the free booklet showing the pro and con positions for each proposition. I also clip relevant newspaper articles and watch debates. I usually turn of the sound or change channels, whenever a campaign commercial comes on. I ignore all the campaign commercials.<br><br>When I go to the grocery store, I read labels and buy whatever sounds like it has the healthiest ingredients.  To me, what the label says, is what counts, not what has been advertised.<br><br>Their adversing campaign would definitely make me even more cynical about ads, than ever. Is that ABC news story actually for real?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article said that " it had developed the campaign to target men under 35 who hate advertising .
" It also said that it " should gain the appreciation from even the most cynical , anti-advertising guy .
" It definitely did not gain my appreciation , and I think of myself as being a cynical , anti-advertising guy .
However , I am way over 35 years old , so I am not their targeted audience.I pretty much ignore most commercials , automotive or otherwise .
Instead , whenever I get ready to buy a car , I look at consumer reports and a few issues of car magazines .
I also ask at least a couple of auto mechanics , what cars and engines are good or bad .
I usually do that same type of research for almost any major hardware , computer or appliance purchase , instead of relying on what the ads say.As a voter , I nearly always ignore campaign commercials , as being both useless brief sound bites and deliberately misleading statements .
Instead , I look at those free booklets which contain brief statements from every candidate and also the free booklet showing the pro and con positions for each proposition .
I also clip relevant newspaper articles and watch debates .
I usually turn of the sound or change channels , whenever a campaign commercial comes on .
I ignore all the campaign commercials.When I go to the grocery store , I read labels and buy whatever sounds like it has the healthiest ingredients .
To me , what the label says , is what counts , not what has been advertised.Their adversing campaign would definitely make me even more cynical about ads , than ever .
Is that ABC news story actually for real ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article said that "it had developed the campaign to target men under 35 who hate advertising.
" It also said that it "should gain the appreciation from even the most cynical, anti-advertising guy.
"It definitely did not gain my appreciation, and I think of myself as being a cynical, anti-advertising guy.
However, I am way over 35 years old, so I am not their targeted audience.I pretty much ignore most commercials, automotive or otherwise.
Instead, whenever I get ready to buy a car, I look at consumer reports and a few issues of car magazines.
I also ask at least a couple of auto mechanics, what cars and engines are good or bad.
I usually do that same type of research for almost any major hardware, computer or appliance purchase, instead of relying on what the ads say.As a voter, I nearly always ignore campaign commercials, as being both useless brief sound bites and deliberately misleading statements.
Instead, I look at those free booklets which contain brief statements from every candidate and also the free booklet showing the pro and con positions for each proposition.
I also clip relevant newspaper articles and watch debates.
I usually turn of the sound or change channels, whenever a campaign commercial comes on.
I ignore all the campaign commercials.When I go to the grocery store, I read labels and buy whatever sounds like it has the healthiest ingredients.
To me, what the label says, is what counts, not what has been advertised.Their adversing campaign would definitely make me even more cynical about ads, than ever.
Is that ABC news story actually for real?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762449</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762831</id>
	<title>When you opt in you expect...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255602540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The emails state who they are from.  If it is a good company I expect all the links to be legit.  If a company tried anything as simple as not making it is clear that it was a legit email I would be pissed.  To go as far as not even inform the recipient that the email is even from the company? I hope the girl wins so we have some lawful control over advertisement emails.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The emails state who they are from .
If it is a good company I expect all the links to be legit .
If a company tried anything as simple as not making it is clear that it was a legit email I would be pissed .
To go as far as not even inform the recipient that the email is even from the company ?
I hope the girl wins so we have some lawful control over advertisement emails .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The emails state who they are from.
If it is a good company I expect all the links to be legit.
If a company tried anything as simple as not making it is clear that it was a legit email I would be pissed.
To go as far as not even inform the recipient that the email is even from the company?
I hope the girl wins so we have some lawful control over advertisement emails.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762629</id>
	<title>Re:Opted In</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1255601700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oddly enough, there's a chance that this was actually contained in the click-through agreement.</p><p>I'd like to see it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oddly enough , there 's a chance that this was actually contained in the click-through agreement.I 'd like to see it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oddly enough, there's a chance that this was actually contained in the click-through agreement.I'd like to see it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762083</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762595</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255601580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about negative advertising? They know you hate ads, therefore company X pays for ads for company Y to be directed at you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about negative advertising ?
They know you hate ads , therefore company X pays for ads for company Y to be directed at you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about negative advertising?
They know you hate ads, therefore company X pays for ads for company Y to be directed at you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763415</id>
	<title>"Victim" part of the campaign?</title>
	<author>V for Vendetta</author>
	<datestamp>1255605420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given the weird minds of marketeers these days, I really wouldn't be surprised if that "victim sueing Toyota for email ad campaign" is in reality part of that campaign. Because otherwise that ad wouldn't have made it to the frontpage(s).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given the weird minds of marketeers these days , I really would n't be surprised if that " victim sueing Toyota for email ad campaign " is in reality part of that campaign .
Because otherwise that ad would n't have made it to the frontpage ( s ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given the weird minds of marketeers these days, I really wouldn't be surprised if that "victim sueing Toyota for email ad campaign" is in reality part of that campaign.
Because otherwise that ad wouldn't have made it to the frontpage(s).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762137</id>
	<title>I don't understand advertising</title>
	<author>SleazyRidr</author>
	<datestamp>1255600140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How does this in any way make anyone want to buy a Toyota?</p><p>I get that companies all want to 'push the envelope' these days so you see them over the competition, but this is just ridiculous.</p><p>I guess that's another benefit to marking every email I don't recognise as spam.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How does this in any way make anyone want to buy a Toyota ? I get that companies all want to 'push the envelope ' these days so you see them over the competition , but this is just ridiculous.I guess that 's another benefit to marking every email I do n't recognise as spam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does this in any way make anyone want to buy a Toyota?I get that companies all want to 'push the envelope' these days so you see them over the competition, but this is just ridiculous.I guess that's another benefit to marking every email I don't recognise as spam.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762705</id>
	<title>Their reply reminds me of a bank</title>
	<author>gurps\_npc</author>
	<datestamp>1255602000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A bank once told me that because I had signed approval for a single specific company to electronically debit my account, that the bank did not need to inform me WHO was debiting my account.

<p>Just because you have given permission for people to send emails to you, it does not grant them permission to threaten you.

</p><p>Similarly, if I give someone permission to enter my home, that does not mean I give permission for them to take my TV, grab the cord, and swing it around their head saying "LET ME WATCH FOX NEWS OR I LET GO!!!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A bank once told me that because I had signed approval for a single specific company to electronically debit my account , that the bank did not need to inform me WHO was debiting my account .
Just because you have given permission for people to send emails to you , it does not grant them permission to threaten you .
Similarly , if I give someone permission to enter my home , that does not mean I give permission for them to take my TV , grab the cord , and swing it around their head saying " LET ME WATCH FOX NEWS OR I LET GO ! ! !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A bank once told me that because I had signed approval for a single specific company to electronically debit my account, that the bank did not need to inform me WHO was debiting my account.
Just because you have given permission for people to send emails to you, it does not grant them permission to threaten you.
Similarly, if I give someone permission to enter my home, that does not mean I give permission for them to take my TV, grab the cord, and swing it around their head saying "LET ME WATCH FOX NEWS OR I LET GO!!!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764155</id>
	<title>Myspace TOS</title>
	<author>Jessified</author>
	<datestamp>1255609800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't this violate the Myspace Terms of Service? Like in the Lori Drew ruling? Is Toyota guilty of hacking?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't this violate the Myspace Terms of Service ?
Like in the Lori Drew ruling ?
Is Toyota guilty of hacking ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't this violate the Myspace Terms of Service?
Like in the Lori Drew ruling?
Is Toyota guilty of hacking?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763413</id>
	<title>Toyota Instant Leprosy</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1255605420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was a hard sell.</p><p>Or maybe they are getting too cocky. Remember how the Sony guys were all like "Oh, we can charge anything for the PS3 and people will bend over and pay it" and all that hoo ha that blew up in their faces. Toyota might be thinking in "there's no such thing as *bad* PR" mode.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was a hard sell.Or maybe they are getting too cocky .
Remember how the Sony guys were all like " Oh , we can charge anything for the PS3 and people will bend over and pay it " and all that hoo ha that blew up in their faces .
Toyota might be thinking in " there 's no such thing as * bad * PR " mode .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was a hard sell.Or maybe they are getting too cocky.
Remember how the Sony guys were all like "Oh, we can charge anything for the PS3 and people will bend over and pay it" and all that hoo ha that blew up in their faces.
Toyota might be thinking in "there's no such thing as *bad* PR" mode.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133</id>
	<title>Advertising these days...</title>
	<author>vekrander</author>
	<datestamp>1255600080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Advertising gets weirder and weirder.  I don't understand how this is supposed to get someone to buy a car.  The only thing I could think of is she didn't had a car so maybe she's supposed to buy a Toyota so she can get the hell away?  I think it's lost on me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Advertising gets weirder and weirder .
I do n't understand how this is supposed to get someone to buy a car .
The only thing I could think of is she did n't had a car so maybe she 's supposed to buy a Toyota so she can get the hell away ?
I think it 's lost on me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Advertising gets weirder and weirder.
I don't understand how this is supposed to get someone to buy a car.
The only thing I could think of is she didn't had a car so maybe she's supposed to buy a Toyota so she can get the hell away?
I think it's lost on me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763343</id>
	<title>Is it really possible to 'pretend' to stalk?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255605060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think that pretending will get you pretty far on the way to actually doing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that pretending will get you pretty far on the way to actually doing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that pretending will get you pretty far on the way to actually doing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762281</id>
	<title>Dear Toyota Marketing</title>
	<author>jim\_v2000</author>
	<datestamp>1255600560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>What the fuck?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What the fuck ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the fuck?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29775123</id>
	<title>Re:Advertising these days...</title>
	<author>tolkienfan</author>
	<datestamp>1255705320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree. I'm 36 now (crap - how did that happen?) And *I* hate advertizing.<br>I don't see how this campaign is supposed to help. The last four or five cars my wife and I have bought have been Toyota, and now I'm seriously considering switchng to something else.<br>It makes me sick. And I don't give a crap if this was some so called friend of hers that submitted her name. It makes me sick.<br>I work for a trading company, but I still wonder if this capitalism idea was such a good one.<br>Fuck.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
I 'm 36 now ( crap - how did that happen ?
) And * I * hate advertizing.I do n't see how this campaign is supposed to help .
The last four or five cars my wife and I have bought have been Toyota , and now I 'm seriously considering switchng to something else.It makes me sick .
And I do n't give a crap if this was some so called friend of hers that submitted her name .
It makes me sick.I work for a trading company , but I still wonder if this capitalism idea was such a good one.Fuck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
I'm 36 now (crap - how did that happen?
) And *I* hate advertizing.I don't see how this campaign is supposed to help.
The last four or five cars my wife and I have bought have been Toyota, and now I'm seriously considering switchng to something else.It makes me sick.
And I don't give a crap if this was some so called friend of hers that submitted her name.
It makes me sick.I work for a trading company, but I still wonder if this capitalism idea was such a good one.Fuck.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763083</id>
	<title>Re:deception psychology experiment waiver</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255603620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This reminds of a psychology experiment a few decades ago, where the consent form was something like:</p><p>I agree to *insert a bunch of things here* including "I agree to be deceived."</p><p>Then you became the subject of an experiment that appeared to be one of the other things, but in reality, you were being deceived as part of the experiment.</p></div><p>I think I saw a documentary about that study. It ended with Michael Douglas jumping off a roof onto a big cushion, right?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This reminds of a psychology experiment a few decades ago , where the consent form was something like : I agree to * insert a bunch of things here * including " I agree to be deceived .
" Then you became the subject of an experiment that appeared to be one of the other things , but in reality , you were being deceived as part of the experiment.I think I saw a documentary about that study .
It ended with Michael Douglas jumping off a roof onto a big cushion , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This reminds of a psychology experiment a few decades ago, where the consent form was something like:I agree to *insert a bunch of things here* including "I agree to be deceived.
"Then you became the subject of an experiment that appeared to be one of the other things, but in reality, you were being deceived as part of the experiment.I think I saw a documentary about that study.
It ended with Michael Douglas jumping off a roof onto a big cushion, right?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764073</id>
	<title>Part of me thinks she knew it was advertising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255609260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but she realised it could pay to be stupid about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but she realised it could pay to be stupid about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but she realised it could pay to be stupid about it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766777</id>
	<title>Re:Read the damn EULA</title>
	<author>Dr. Hellno</author>
	<datestamp>1255689060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The right to [something] in [somewhere] should only be given to [me]</p></div><p>Right wing ideology in a nut(heh)shell.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The right to [ something ] in [ somewhere ] should only be given to [ me ] Right wing ideology in a nut ( heh ) shell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The right to [something] in [somewhere] should only be given to [me]Right wing ideology in a nut(heh)shell.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764265</id>
	<title>Hmm...</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1255610640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When your "viral marketing" campaign is indistinguishable from criminal harassment, perhaps it is not a very good marketing campaign!<br> <br>
Of course one must consider the possibility that this woman's complaint is itself a planned part of the campaign, in which case congratulations slashdot on giving Toyota free press.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When your " viral marketing " campaign is indistinguishable from criminal harassment , perhaps it is not a very good marketing campaign !
Of course one must consider the possibility that this woman 's complaint is itself a planned part of the campaign , in which case congratulations slashdot on giving Toyota free press .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When your "viral marketing" campaign is indistinguishable from criminal harassment, perhaps it is not a very good marketing campaign!
Of course one must consider the possibility that this woman's complaint is itself a planned part of the campaign, in which case congratulations slashdot on giving Toyota free press.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766883</id>
	<title>LOL Americans...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255690920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LOL!!!!!!.....$10 mil...so typical american...<br>Hmm I need money, dont wanna work to much. YES! Imma sue something or someone.<br>Land of the free?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..Land of the lamers would be more appropriate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL ! ! ! ! !
! ..... $ 10 mil...so typical american...Hmm I need money , dont wan na work to much .
YES ! Imma sue something or someone.Land of the free ?
..Land of the lamers would be more appropriate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL!!!!!
!.....$10 mil...so typical american...Hmm I need money, dont wanna work to much.
YES! Imma sue something or someone.Land of the free?
..Land of the lamers would be more appropriate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762759</id>
	<title>Dear Rush Limbaugh:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255602180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You made racially inflammatory remarks on your<br>alleged "talk" show. Therefore you should be denied part ownership of the St. Louis Rams. You are also a hate-speech propoganda blow hard.</p><p>Sue me for libel. I double dare you.</p><p>Yours In Petrograd,<br>Kilgore Trout.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You made racially inflammatory remarks on youralleged " talk " show .
Therefore you should be denied part ownership of the St. Louis Rams .
You are also a hate-speech propoganda blow hard.Sue me for libel .
I double dare you.Yours In Petrograd,Kilgore Trout .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You made racially inflammatory remarks on youralleged "talk" show.
Therefore you should be denied part ownership of the St. Louis Rams.
You are also a hate-speech propoganda blow hard.Sue me for libel.
I double dare you.Yours In Petrograd,Kilgore Trout.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767949</id>
	<title>Re:Commuter cars</title>
	<author>hmar</author>
	<datestamp>1255704180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I heard the manual Versa was a powerless dog. Is this better in the 09?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard the manual Versa was a powerless dog .
Is this better in the 09 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard the manual Versa was a powerless dog.
Is this better in the 09?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767773</id>
	<title>Re:Read the damn EULA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255702920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You obviously didn't read the fine print.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You obviously did n't read the fine print .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You obviously didn't read the fine print.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767241</id>
	<title>Re:Read the damn EULA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255697520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean I clicked 'I Agree' all those times for NOTHING??!?!?!?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean I clicked 'I Agree ' all those times for NOTHING ? ? ! ? ! ? ! ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean I clicked 'I Agree' all those times for NOTHING??!?!?!?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765685</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>kackle</author>
	<datestamp>1255626240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Allow me to sum this up with a car analogy...

Oh, wait a second...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Allow me to sum this up with a car analogy.. . Oh , wait a second.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Allow me to sum this up with a car analogy...

Oh, wait a second...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762433</id>
	<title>$10M - Sounds a bit Low</title>
	<author>gpronger</author>
	<datestamp>1255601100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not quite sure how you'd word an "Op-In" agreement that would effectively cover this; "I consent to receive life threatening emails, harassed, etc."? <br> <br>
In other words anything that would, <i>in plain English</i>, explain what you were agreeing to, no one would sign.<br> <br>
And regarding $10M, though this may seem like a lot of money, the point to this type of suit is deterrent, and at $10M, I doubt that it is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not quite sure how you 'd word an " Op-In " agreement that would effectively cover this ; " I consent to receive life threatening emails , harassed , etc. " ?
In other words anything that would , in plain English , explain what you were agreeing to , no one would sign .
And regarding $ 10M , though this may seem like a lot of money , the point to this type of suit is deterrent , and at $ 10M , I doubt that it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not quite sure how you'd word an "Op-In" agreement that would effectively cover this; "I consent to receive life threatening emails, harassed, etc."?
In other words anything that would, in plain English, explain what you were agreeing to, no one would sign.
And regarding $10M, though this may seem like a lot of money, the point to this type of suit is deterrent, and at $10M, I doubt that it is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764805</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand advertising</title>
	<author>canajin56</author>
	<datestamp>1255615500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It doesn't make the people Toyota is stalking want to.  It's for the "friend".  See, the "friend" goes to Toyota, and sees an ad for the Matrix on the page where they "punk" their friend by filling in their e-mail address.  Toyota then sends the victim a "personality test" and in 6 point font at the bottom of the test is a "privacy policy" link that contains page after page of legal mumbo jumbo, including consent to receiving marketing messages.  To submit their "personality test" you have to check the "I agree to the privacy policy" checkbox.  There, Toyota contends that is written, informed consent.  Then they send threatening messages to the victim, pretending a criminal on the run from the law is coming to get them, and talking about how he's going to "deal" with those who have wronged him, etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't make the people Toyota is stalking want to .
It 's for the " friend " .
See , the " friend " goes to Toyota , and sees an ad for the Matrix on the page where they " punk " their friend by filling in their e-mail address .
Toyota then sends the victim a " personality test " and in 6 point font at the bottom of the test is a " privacy policy " link that contains page after page of legal mumbo jumbo , including consent to receiving marketing messages .
To submit their " personality test " you have to check the " I agree to the privacy policy " checkbox .
There , Toyota contends that is written , informed consent .
Then they send threatening messages to the victim , pretending a criminal on the run from the law is coming to get them , and talking about how he 's going to " deal " with those who have wronged him , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't make the people Toyota is stalking want to.
It's for the "friend".
See, the "friend" goes to Toyota, and sees an ad for the Matrix on the page where they "punk" their friend by filling in their e-mail address.
Toyota then sends the victim a "personality test" and in 6 point font at the bottom of the test is a "privacy policy" link that contains page after page of legal mumbo jumbo, including consent to receiving marketing messages.
To submit their "personality test" you have to check the "I agree to the privacy policy" checkbox.
There, Toyota contends that is written, informed consent.
Then they send threatening messages to the victim, pretending a criminal on the run from the law is coming to get them, and talking about how he's going to "deal" with those who have wronged him, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762137</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763831</id>
	<title>Re:Advertising these days...</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1255608000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is "Toyota is really desperate to get anyone to buy their car" really the kind of association they want people to form?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is " Toyota is really desperate to get anyone to buy their car " really the kind of association they want people to form ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is "Toyota is really desperate to get anyone to buy their car" really the kind of association they want people to form?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762625</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762373</id>
	<title>Scared?</title>
	<author>Alarindris</author>
	<datestamp>1255600920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What is with the 'victimization' culture these days?<br> <br>

Grow a pair and just ignore it, or call the cops if you're really that scared of junk mail.<br> <br>

I think if she isn't in some sort of self defense class now, the court should throw her case out as she obviously wasn't scared enough to change anything about her life.  Seriously, if she was ACTUALLY scared of some random person from Europe, what about the thug around the corner?  Surely she'd want to learn to protect herself.<br> <br>

But of course she won't because she wasn't actually scared.<br> <br>

She's just as pathetic as the advertising company IMHO.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is with the 'victimization ' culture these days ?
Grow a pair and just ignore it , or call the cops if you 're really that scared of junk mail .
I think if she is n't in some sort of self defense class now , the court should throw her case out as she obviously was n't scared enough to change anything about her life .
Seriously , if she was ACTUALLY scared of some random person from Europe , what about the thug around the corner ?
Surely she 'd want to learn to protect herself .
But of course she wo n't because she was n't actually scared .
She 's just as pathetic as the advertising company IMHO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is with the 'victimization' culture these days?
Grow a pair and just ignore it, or call the cops if you're really that scared of junk mail.
I think if she isn't in some sort of self defense class now, the court should throw her case out as she obviously wasn't scared enough to change anything about her life.
Seriously, if she was ACTUALLY scared of some random person from Europe, what about the thug around the corner?
Surely she'd want to learn to protect herself.
But of course she won't because she wasn't actually scared.
She's just as pathetic as the advertising company IMHO.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762625</id>
	<title>Re:Advertising these days...</title>
	<author>fireball84513</author>
	<datestamp>1255601700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think it's less to do with creating a good image of Toyota and more to do with getting people thinking about Toyota. Just look at the hype this stupid prank has created. If some guy out there is thinking of buying a car but hasn't the first clue of what he should get, he will probably see this story in the news and the next thing you know he will be thinking "Toyota" the rest of the day and might actually get one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's less to do with creating a good image of Toyota and more to do with getting people thinking about Toyota .
Just look at the hype this stupid prank has created .
If some guy out there is thinking of buying a car but has n't the first clue of what he should get , he will probably see this story in the news and the next thing you know he will be thinking " Toyota " the rest of the day and might actually get one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's less to do with creating a good image of Toyota and more to do with getting people thinking about Toyota.
Just look at the hype this stupid prank has created.
If some guy out there is thinking of buying a car but hasn't the first clue of what he should get, he will probably see this story in the news and the next thing you know he will be thinking "Toyota" the rest of the day and might actually get one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767047</id>
	<title>A clear case</title>
	<author>Cannelloni</author>
	<datestamp>1255694100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This possibly the stupidest advertising campaign I have ever heard of. How does this build confidence in the Toyota brand? How does this treat the customer in a respectful manner? How does this make people buy Toyota Matrix cars? The very unprofessional and careless people responsible for this at Saatchi &amp; Saatchi and the people at Toyota who signed the approval should be fired immediately. Yes, this woman was probably not really in real distress, but maybe she should have the money just to make sure this kind of advertising never happens again. Unless, of course, further evidence reveals that it was clearly stated, or plainly understood from the very beginning, that this campaign was a joke.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This possibly the stupidest advertising campaign I have ever heard of .
How does this build confidence in the Toyota brand ?
How does this treat the customer in a respectful manner ?
How does this make people buy Toyota Matrix cars ?
The very unprofessional and careless people responsible for this at Saatchi &amp; Saatchi and the people at Toyota who signed the approval should be fired immediately .
Yes , this woman was probably not really in real distress , but maybe she should have the money just to make sure this kind of advertising never happens again .
Unless , of course , further evidence reveals that it was clearly stated , or plainly understood from the very beginning , that this campaign was a joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This possibly the stupidest advertising campaign I have ever heard of.
How does this build confidence in the Toyota brand?
How does this treat the customer in a respectful manner?
How does this make people buy Toyota Matrix cars?
The very unprofessional and careless people responsible for this at Saatchi &amp; Saatchi and the people at Toyota who signed the approval should be fired immediately.
Yes, this woman was probably not really in real distress, but maybe she should have the money just to make sure this kind of advertising never happens again.
Unless, of course, further evidence reveals that it was clearly stated, or plainly understood from the very beginning, that this campaign was a joke.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765119</id>
	<title>This?</title>
	<author>EricX2</author>
	<datestamp>1255618620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this the ad she got fooled by?</p><p><a href="http://joshmoles.com/2008/04/06/toyota-prank-results/" title="joshmoles.com" rel="nofollow">http://joshmoles.com/2008/04/06/toyota-prank-results/</a> [joshmoles.com]</p><p>If so, she got an email and agreed to get more emails and is probably so stupid she doesn't remember it.... I'd pretend to be stupid for 10 MILLION DOLLARS!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this the ad she got fooled by ? http : //joshmoles.com/2008/04/06/toyota-prank-results/ [ joshmoles.com ] If so , she got an email and agreed to get more emails and is probably so stupid she does n't remember it.... I 'd pretend to be stupid for 10 MILLION DOLLARS !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this the ad she got fooled by?http://joshmoles.com/2008/04/06/toyota-prank-results/ [joshmoles.com]If so, she got an email and agreed to get more emails and is probably so stupid she doesn't remember it.... I'd pretend to be stupid for 10 MILLION DOLLARS!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29769123</id>
	<title>Re:Clarification on the campain</title>
	<author>kalirion</author>
	<datestamp>1255710300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's exactly as sinister as it sounds.  So instead of being randomly targeted, someone you know signs you up for harassment.  Guess what, with violent crimes the victims often know their attackers.  Does that make them feel all warm and fuzzy inside?  The "opt in."  Agreeing to receive marketing email is not the same as agreeing to be harassed and made to think your life is in danger.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's exactly as sinister as it sounds .
So instead of being randomly targeted , someone you know signs you up for harassment .
Guess what , with violent crimes the victims often know their attackers .
Does that make them feel all warm and fuzzy inside ?
The " opt in .
" Agreeing to receive marketing email is not the same as agreeing to be harassed and made to think your life is in danger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's exactly as sinister as it sounds.
So instead of being randomly targeted, someone you know signs you up for harassment.
Guess what, with violent crimes the victims often know their attackers.
Does that make them feel all warm and fuzzy inside?
The "opt in.
"  Agreeing to receive marketing email is not the same as agreeing to be harassed and made to think your life is in danger.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763027</id>
	<title>Re:Opted In</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1255603440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yes! I'd like to receive death threats, disturbing messages, and other items of a stalking nature from Toyota Motor Corporation.</p></div><p>Depends on what they consider a "message."</p><p>On the extreme off-chance that toyota needs an opt-out of their "letterbomb people who aren't buying the toyota matrix" marketing campaign, I'd like to officially opt out right now.  Same goes for if they are running a campaign where the message is polaroids of kidnapped family members being tortured.  Horse heads in my bed also I'd like to opt out of.  Messages keyed into my non-toyota car I'd like to opt out of.  Any communications from toyota that come in the form of water poured onto my face through a cloth as I'm tied up in a declined position (the "waterboarding" marketing campaign) I'd like to opt out of.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes !
I 'd like to receive death threats , disturbing messages , and other items of a stalking nature from Toyota Motor Corporation.Depends on what they consider a " message .
" On the extreme off-chance that toyota needs an opt-out of their " letterbomb people who are n't buying the toyota matrix " marketing campaign , I 'd like to officially opt out right now .
Same goes for if they are running a campaign where the message is polaroids of kidnapped family members being tortured .
Horse heads in my bed also I 'd like to opt out of .
Messages keyed into my non-toyota car I 'd like to opt out of .
Any communications from toyota that come in the form of water poured onto my face through a cloth as I 'm tied up in a declined position ( the " waterboarding " marketing campaign ) I 'd like to opt out of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes!
I'd like to receive death threats, disturbing messages, and other items of a stalking nature from Toyota Motor Corporation.Depends on what they consider a "message.
"On the extreme off-chance that toyota needs an opt-out of their "letterbomb people who aren't buying the toyota matrix" marketing campaign, I'd like to officially opt out right now.
Same goes for if they are running a campaign where the message is polaroids of kidnapped family members being tortured.
Horse heads in my bed also I'd like to opt out of.
Messages keyed into my non-toyota car I'd like to opt out of.
Any communications from toyota that come in the form of water poured onto my face through a cloth as I'm tied up in a declined position (the "waterboarding" marketing campaign) I'd like to opt out of.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762083</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764089</id>
	<title>Re:Advertising these days...</title>
	<author>Nefarious Wheel</author>
	<datestamp>1255609320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Advertising gets weirder and weirder. I don't understand how this is supposed to get someone to buy a car. The only thing I could think of is she didn't had a car so maybe she's supposed to buy a Toyota so she can get the hell away? I think it's lost on me.</p></div><p>Hang on, what makes you think those threats were just <i>advertising</i>? They really are desperate to move those cars.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Advertising gets weirder and weirder .
I do n't understand how this is supposed to get someone to buy a car .
The only thing I could think of is she did n't had a car so maybe she 's supposed to buy a Toyota so she can get the hell away ?
I think it 's lost on me.Hang on , what makes you think those threats were just advertising ?
They really are desperate to move those cars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Advertising gets weirder and weirder.
I don't understand how this is supposed to get someone to buy a car.
The only thing I could think of is she didn't had a car so maybe she's supposed to buy a Toyota so she can get the hell away?
I think it's lost on me.Hang on, what makes you think those threats were just advertising?
They really are desperate to move those cars.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762701</id>
	<title>linux users opt in</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255601940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>to taking dicks in their asses and being infected with aids.</htmltext>
<tokenext>to taking dicks in their asses and being infected with aids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to taking dicks in their asses and being infected with aids.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767755</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand advertising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255702860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When you want nothing to do with them, they call you during dinner with things you don't want and don't need.  When you do need them, because something is wrong with their product, they let you talk to machines until you get fed up.</p></div><p>I've never understood the complaint that they call you "during dinner". What do you think they've done research to find the specific time that *you* have dinner and deliberately called you at that time? I mean, wtf? If it's not a good time to talk, let the machine take the call...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When you want nothing to do with them , they call you during dinner with things you do n't want and do n't need .
When you do need them , because something is wrong with their product , they let you talk to machines until you get fed up.I 've never understood the complaint that they call you " during dinner " .
What do you think they 've done research to find the specific time that * you * have dinner and deliberately called you at that time ?
I mean , wtf ?
If it 's not a good time to talk , let the machine take the call.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you want nothing to do with them, they call you during dinner with things you don't want and don't need.
When you do need them, because something is wrong with their product, they let you talk to machines until you get fed up.I've never understood the complaint that they call you "during dinner".
What do you think they've done research to find the specific time that *you* have dinner and deliberately called you at that time?
I mean, wtf?
If it's not a good time to talk, let the machine take the call...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762853</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762167</id>
	<title>Read the damn EULA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255600200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not to be pedantic, but it's all right there in the EULA. See below (<i>emphasis mine</i>):<br> <br>

<b>Limitation on Scope of Content</b> <br>
The Toyota Web site, toyota.com, contains information regarding Toyota and its products and promotional programs. The Toyota vehicles described on this site contain uniquely American specifications and equipment and are offered for sale only in the continental U.S.A. The promotional programs described on this site are only available in the continental US and may be limited to particular states as described by the program. All pricing information referred to on this site is in U.S. dollars.<br> <br>

<b>No Representation or Warranty</b> <br>
Toyota reserves the right to modify the information contained on this site at any time without notice. While Toyota makes all reasonable efforts to ensure that all material on this site is correct, accuracy cannot be guaranteed and Toyota does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or authenticity of any information contained on this site. <i>By viewing this site, you agree to release and indemnify Toyota from all legal responsibility arising from sending you emails, hiding in bushes outside your house, picking through your trash and dry-humping your dog, cat and/or hamster(s)</i>. This site and all information and materials contained herein, is provided to you as is without warranty of any kind.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to be pedantic , but it 's all right there in the EULA .
See below ( emphasis mine ) : Limitation on Scope of Content The Toyota Web site , toyota.com , contains information regarding Toyota and its products and promotional programs .
The Toyota vehicles described on this site contain uniquely American specifications and equipment and are offered for sale only in the continental U.S.A. The promotional programs described on this site are only available in the continental US and may be limited to particular states as described by the program .
All pricing information referred to on this site is in U.S. dollars . No Representation or Warranty Toyota reserves the right to modify the information contained on this site at any time without notice .
While Toyota makes all reasonable efforts to ensure that all material on this site is correct , accuracy can not be guaranteed and Toyota does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy , completeness or authenticity of any information contained on this site .
By viewing this site , you agree to release and indemnify Toyota from all legal responsibility arising from sending you emails , hiding in bushes outside your house , picking through your trash and dry-humping your dog , cat and/or hamster ( s ) .
This site and all information and materials contained herein , is provided to you as is without warranty of any kind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to be pedantic, but it's all right there in the EULA.
See below (emphasis mine): 

Limitation on Scope of Content 
The Toyota Web site, toyota.com, contains information regarding Toyota and its products and promotional programs.
The Toyota vehicles described on this site contain uniquely American specifications and equipment and are offered for sale only in the continental U.S.A. The promotional programs described on this site are only available in the continental US and may be limited to particular states as described by the program.
All pricing information referred to on this site is in U.S. dollars. 

No Representation or Warranty 
Toyota reserves the right to modify the information contained on this site at any time without notice.
While Toyota makes all reasonable efforts to ensure that all material on this site is correct, accuracy cannot be guaranteed and Toyota does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or authenticity of any information contained on this site.
By viewing this site, you agree to release and indemnify Toyota from all legal responsibility arising from sending you emails, hiding in bushes outside your house, picking through your trash and dry-humping your dog, cat and/or hamster(s).
This site and all information and materials contained herein, is provided to you as is without warranty of any kind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763127</id>
	<title>Re:Advertising these days...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255603800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, like Toyota *needs* more publicity, right?  I mean, just look at the company...</p><ul>
<li>Over takes GM as the biggest car manufacturer.</li><li>Became the "name brand" of eco-cars with the Prius.  You can't say "hybrid" without thinking "Prius".</li><li>The Corolla is like the best selling car in America.</li><li>Toyota has been named one of the best car brands by folks like readers digest for some time now.</li></ul><p>I mean, heck, Toyota needs all the help they can get, amiright?</p><p>Though, why the hell they want to do something edgy with the Matrix is beyond me.  They should just do a customer loyalty and convenience thing.  There's nothing bloody edgy about a sports-wagon.</p><p>* Disclaimer, I technically own 2 Toyota cars.  A Corolla and a Pontiac Vibe(aka "Matrix").  Both have been great cars.</p><p>Yet, at the same time... this is typical American culture.  Some woman thinks she deserves 10 million dollars because she got some email.  I'd like to see examples of this email.  All I can find so far is <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/stephanie-schomer/write/toyota-terror-marketing-campaign" title="fastcompany.com" rel="nofollow">An ad asking people to sign up</a> [fastcompany.com] and <a href="http://jalopnik.com/367404/2009-toyota-matrix--ad-campaign-prank-oriented" title="jalopnik.com" rel="nofollow">some people who tried it</a> [jalopnik.com].</p><p>It's odd.  It appears that the campaign is that you sign yourself up for the website.  Then you get phone calls, emails, and other communications from this odd personality (pre-defined and picked from the website).  After 5 days of ads, you find out... "PUNK'D" that you did it to yourself by signing up for the website?  *boggle*</p><p>Ok, dumb prank.  I think it could cross the line, particularly with phone calls and what not.  But $10 million?  Yeah right.  Maybe a public scorning, some rolled heads, and an apology.   Whatever.  "American Dream" of making it rich has been "sue sue sue" for some time now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , like Toyota * needs * more publicity , right ?
I mean , just look at the company.. . Over takes GM as the biggest car manufacturer.Became the " name brand " of eco-cars with the Prius .
You ca n't say " hybrid " without thinking " Prius " .The Corolla is like the best selling car in America.Toyota has been named one of the best car brands by folks like readers digest for some time now.I mean , heck , Toyota needs all the help they can get , amiright ? Though , why the hell they want to do something edgy with the Matrix is beyond me .
They should just do a customer loyalty and convenience thing .
There 's nothing bloody edgy about a sports-wagon .
* Disclaimer , I technically own 2 Toyota cars .
A Corolla and a Pontiac Vibe ( aka " Matrix " ) .
Both have been great cars.Yet , at the same time... this is typical American culture .
Some woman thinks she deserves 10 million dollars because she got some email .
I 'd like to see examples of this email .
All I can find so far is An ad asking people to sign up [ fastcompany.com ] and some people who tried it [ jalopnik.com ] .It 's odd .
It appears that the campaign is that you sign yourself up for the website .
Then you get phone calls , emails , and other communications from this odd personality ( pre-defined and picked from the website ) .
After 5 days of ads , you find out... " PUNK 'D " that you did it to yourself by signing up for the website ?
* boggle * Ok , dumb prank .
I think it could cross the line , particularly with phone calls and what not .
But $ 10 million ?
Yeah right .
Maybe a public scorning , some rolled heads , and an apology .
Whatever. " American Dream " of making it rich has been " sue sue sue " for some time now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, like Toyota *needs* more publicity, right?
I mean, just look at the company...
Over takes GM as the biggest car manufacturer.Became the "name brand" of eco-cars with the Prius.
You can't say "hybrid" without thinking "Prius".The Corolla is like the best selling car in America.Toyota has been named one of the best car brands by folks like readers digest for some time now.I mean, heck, Toyota needs all the help they can get, amiright?Though, why the hell they want to do something edgy with the Matrix is beyond me.
They should just do a customer loyalty and convenience thing.
There's nothing bloody edgy about a sports-wagon.
* Disclaimer, I technically own 2 Toyota cars.
A Corolla and a Pontiac Vibe(aka "Matrix").
Both have been great cars.Yet, at the same time... this is typical American culture.
Some woman thinks she deserves 10 million dollars because she got some email.
I'd like to see examples of this email.
All I can find so far is An ad asking people to sign up [fastcompany.com] and some people who tried it [jalopnik.com].It's odd.
It appears that the campaign is that you sign yourself up for the website.
Then you get phone calls, emails, and other communications from this odd personality (pre-defined and picked from the website).
After 5 days of ads, you find out... "PUNK'D" that you did it to yourself by signing up for the website?
*boggle*Ok, dumb prank.
I think it could cross the line, particularly with phone calls and what not.
But $10 million?
Yeah right.
Maybe a public scorning, some rolled heads, and an apology.
Whatever.  "American Dream" of making it rich has been "sue sue sue" for some time now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762625</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29768739</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand advertising</title>
	<author>magus\_melchior</author>
	<datestamp>1255708380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's because some numbskull (or genius, depending on which side of the money you're on) determined that it would be more profitable to a company to be a complete asshole to its existing customers while at the same time ramping up the marketing budget to grab more customers. Customer service is one of those parts of doing business where you will be guaranteed to lose your entire investment; marketing always has a return. It's called "churn", and it's one of the reasons why so many companies jettisoned customer service principles that were once a hallmark of good business.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's because some numbskull ( or genius , depending on which side of the money you 're on ) determined that it would be more profitable to a company to be a complete asshole to its existing customers while at the same time ramping up the marketing budget to grab more customers .
Customer service is one of those parts of doing business where you will be guaranteed to lose your entire investment ; marketing always has a return .
It 's called " churn " , and it 's one of the reasons why so many companies jettisoned customer service principles that were once a hallmark of good business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's because some numbskull (or genius, depending on which side of the money you're on) determined that it would be more profitable to a company to be a complete asshole to its existing customers while at the same time ramping up the marketing budget to grab more customers.
Customer service is one of those parts of doing business where you will be guaranteed to lose your entire investment; marketing always has a return.
It's called "churn", and it's one of the reasons why so many companies jettisoned customer service principles that were once a hallmark of good business.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762853</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763205</id>
	<title>Re:Advertising these days...</title>
	<author>Snaller</author>
	<datestamp>1255604220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I think it's less to do with creating a good image of Toyota and more to do with getting people thinking about Toyota. "</p><p>It's working! I'm thinking: 'Toyota, what a bunch of assholes!'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I think it 's less to do with creating a good image of Toyota and more to do with getting people thinking about Toyota .
" It 's working !
I 'm thinking : 'Toyota , what a bunch of assholes !
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I think it's less to do with creating a good image of Toyota and more to do with getting people thinking about Toyota.
"It's working!
I'm thinking: 'Toyota, what a bunch of assholes!
'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762625</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061</id>
	<title>I'm over 35</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255599780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Saatchi &amp; Saatchi told the marketing magazine OMMA last year that it had developed the campaign to target men under 35 who hate advertising.</p></div><p>I'm over 35 and I <i>really</i> hate advertising now. If I did something like this, I'd be in jail awaiting trial, my name would be smeared all over the place, and my life as I know it would be over - even Saatchi &amp; Saatchi wouldn't hire me. </p><p>Toyota? Nothing.</p><p>Saatchi &amp; Saatchi? They'll probably get more business because the dipshit MBAs will think that "there's no such thing as bad publicity." </p><p>Assholes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Saatchi &amp; Saatchi told the marketing magazine OMMA last year that it had developed the campaign to target men under 35 who hate advertising.I 'm over 35 and I really hate advertising now .
If I did something like this , I 'd be in jail awaiting trial , my name would be smeared all over the place , and my life as I know it would be over - even Saatchi &amp; Saatchi would n't hire me .
Toyota ? Nothing.Saatchi &amp; Saatchi ?
They 'll probably get more business because the dipshit MBAs will think that " there 's no such thing as bad publicity .
" Assholes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Saatchi &amp; Saatchi told the marketing magazine OMMA last year that it had developed the campaign to target men under 35 who hate advertising.I'm over 35 and I really hate advertising now.
If I did something like this, I'd be in jail awaiting trial, my name would be smeared all over the place, and my life as I know it would be over - even Saatchi &amp; Saatchi wouldn't hire me.
Toyota? Nothing.Saatchi &amp; Saatchi?
They'll probably get more business because the dipshit MBAs will think that "there's no such thing as bad publicity.
" Assholes.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763791</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>mdarksbane</author>
	<datestamp>1255607760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The matrix drives like shit anyway. Feels like a van in a car's body.</p><p>If you want a little wagon that you can stand driving, we strongly preferred the Mazda3's in our test drives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The matrix drives like shit anyway .
Feels like a van in a car 's body.If you want a little wagon that you can stand driving , we strongly preferred the Mazda3 's in our test drives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The matrix drives like shit anyway.
Feels like a van in a car's body.If you want a little wagon that you can stand driving, we strongly preferred the Mazda3's in our test drives.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767913</id>
	<title>Re:Read the damn EULA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255703940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>JUST BECAUSE YOU PUT IT IN A CONTRACT AND GET SOMEONE TO SIGN IT DOESN'T MAKE IT LEGALLY BINDING.</p></div><p>On the contrary, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Contract Law</a> [wikipedia.org] states:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Agreement is said to be reached when an offer capable of immediate acceptance is met with a "mirror image" acceptance (ie, an unqualified acceptance). The parties must have the necessary capacity to contract and the contract must not be either trifling, indeterminate, impossible or illegal. Contract law is based on the principle expressed in the Latin phrase pacta sunt servanda (usually translated "pacts must be kept", but more literally "agreements are to be kept").[2] Breach of contract is recognized by the law and remedies can be provided.</p><p>As long as the good or service provided is legal, any oral agreement between two parties can constitute a binding legal contract. The practical limitation to this, however, is that only parties to a written agreement have material evidence (the written contract itself) to prove the actual terms uttered at the time the agreement was struck.</p></div><p>In other words, if you and I were to exchange emails saying I'd fix your computer and you'd give me beer, that's a legally binding contract. Both sides are legal, and agreed upon. Of course, there is a questionable legality and applicability of the contract on Toyotas side. If she agreed to Toyota newsletters (Check out the 2010 Toyota WTF 2.5i), that's one thing. If Toyota sees that agreement as a license to send death threats if she doesn't buy another car, that's quite another.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>JUST BECAUSE YOU PUT IT IN A CONTRACT AND GET SOMEONE TO SIGN IT DOES N'T MAKE IT LEGALLY BINDING.On the contrary , Contract Law [ wikipedia.org ] states : Agreement is said to be reached when an offer capable of immediate acceptance is met with a " mirror image " acceptance ( ie , an unqualified acceptance ) .
The parties must have the necessary capacity to contract and the contract must not be either trifling , indeterminate , impossible or illegal .
Contract law is based on the principle expressed in the Latin phrase pacta sunt servanda ( usually translated " pacts must be kept " , but more literally " agreements are to be kept " ) .
[ 2 ] Breach of contract is recognized by the law and remedies can be provided.As long as the good or service provided is legal , any oral agreement between two parties can constitute a binding legal contract .
The practical limitation to this , however , is that only parties to a written agreement have material evidence ( the written contract itself ) to prove the actual terms uttered at the time the agreement was struck.In other words , if you and I were to exchange emails saying I 'd fix your computer and you 'd give me beer , that 's a legally binding contract .
Both sides are legal , and agreed upon .
Of course , there is a questionable legality and applicability of the contract on Toyotas side .
If she agreed to Toyota newsletters ( Check out the 2010 Toyota WTF 2.5i ) , that 's one thing .
If Toyota sees that agreement as a license to send death threats if she does n't buy another car , that 's quite another .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>JUST BECAUSE YOU PUT IT IN A CONTRACT AND GET SOMEONE TO SIGN IT DOESN'T MAKE IT LEGALLY BINDING.On the contrary, Contract Law [wikipedia.org] states:Agreement is said to be reached when an offer capable of immediate acceptance is met with a "mirror image" acceptance (ie, an unqualified acceptance).
The parties must have the necessary capacity to contract and the contract must not be either trifling, indeterminate, impossible or illegal.
Contract law is based on the principle expressed in the Latin phrase pacta sunt servanda (usually translated "pacts must be kept", but more literally "agreements are to be kept").
[2] Breach of contract is recognized by the law and remedies can be provided.As long as the good or service provided is legal, any oral agreement between two parties can constitute a binding legal contract.
The practical limitation to this, however, is that only parties to a written agreement have material evidence (the written contract itself) to prove the actual terms uttered at the time the agreement was struck.In other words, if you and I were to exchange emails saying I'd fix your computer and you'd give me beer, that's a legally binding contract.
Both sides are legal, and agreed upon.
Of course, there is a questionable legality and applicability of the contract on Toyotas side.
If she agreed to Toyota newsletters (Check out the 2010 Toyota WTF 2.5i), that's one thing.
If Toyota sees that agreement as a license to send death threats if she doesn't buy another car, that's quite another.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766101</id>
	<title>Re:Advertising these days...</title>
	<author>electrons\_are\_brave</author>
	<datestamp>1255633620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not aimed at her. The link says: "Saatchi &amp; Saatchi told the marketing magazine OMMA last year that it had developed the campaign to target men under 35 who hate advertising." The idea was to get their attention and then it would increase brand recognition for the car.<p>

Problem is that it may have created an association that people who buy this car do so because they find the idea of a woman being punked by a friend and stalked by a car company funny, or a least inoffensive enough that they weren't put off buying it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not aimed at her .
The link says : " Saatchi &amp; Saatchi told the marketing magazine OMMA last year that it had developed the campaign to target men under 35 who hate advertising .
" The idea was to get their attention and then it would increase brand recognition for the car .
Problem is that it may have created an association that people who buy this car do so because they find the idea of a woman being punked by a friend and stalked by a car company funny , or a least inoffensive enough that they were n't put off buying it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not aimed at her.
The link says: "Saatchi &amp; Saatchi told the marketing magazine OMMA last year that it had developed the campaign to target men under 35 who hate advertising.
" The idea was to get their attention and then it would increase brand recognition for the car.
Problem is that it may have created an association that people who buy this car do so because they find the idea of a woman being punked by a friend and stalked by a car company funny, or a least inoffensive enough that they weren't put off buying it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29846337</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand advertising</title>
	<author>incer</author>
	<datestamp>1256314380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>[...]happens less frequently in most places in Western Europe because stronger consumer laws mean that as a consumer you can much more easily claw back your money without spending a penny in lawyers.</p></div><p>Yeah, sure.<br> <br>


<i>--Italian guy</i></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ ... ] happens less frequently in most places in Western Europe because stronger consumer laws mean that as a consumer you can much more easily claw back your money without spending a penny in lawyers.Yeah , sure .
--Italian guy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[...]happens less frequently in most places in Western Europe because stronger consumer laws mean that as a consumer you can much more easily claw back your money without spending a penny in lawyers.Yeah, sure.
--Italian guy
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766641</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762881</id>
	<title>Classic Advertising</title>
	<author>SoundGuyNoise</author>
	<datestamp>1255602720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They should written about the "Oh, What a Feeling" he'll have when the so-called stalker doesn't have to run from the law anymore.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They should written about the " Oh , What a Feeling " he 'll have when the so-called stalker does n't have to run from the law anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should written about the "Oh, What a Feeling" he'll have when the so-called stalker doesn't have to run from the law anymore.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764751</id>
	<title>Re:How does this happen?</title>
	<author>dbIII</author>
	<datestamp>1255615020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's what I think about every second Hollywood movie when I see a dozen enormous and stupid mistakes that made it past hundreds of highly skilled people working for a couple of years on it.  I think it's some modern perversion of Fuedalism at work where nobody dares question the stupid ideas of the boss.  The movies of Mel Gibson are a good example - shining technically perfect moments of art disrupted by plot and dialogue that ruin the entire production.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what I think about every second Hollywood movie when I see a dozen enormous and stupid mistakes that made it past hundreds of highly skilled people working for a couple of years on it .
I think it 's some modern perversion of Fuedalism at work where nobody dares question the stupid ideas of the boss .
The movies of Mel Gibson are a good example - shining technically perfect moments of art disrupted by plot and dialogue that ruin the entire production .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what I think about every second Hollywood movie when I see a dozen enormous and stupid mistakes that made it past hundreds of highly skilled people working for a couple of years on it.
I think it's some modern perversion of Fuedalism at work where nobody dares question the stupid ideas of the boss.
The movies of Mel Gibson are a good example - shining technically perfect moments of art disrupted by plot and dialogue that ruin the entire production.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763643</id>
	<title>MyWasteOfSpace</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255606740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This just in, "MySpace is a waste of time for everybody except teenage girls!" Oh wait, I thought it was still 2004...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This just in , " MySpace is a waste of time for everybody except teenage girls !
" Oh wait , I thought it was still 2004.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This just in, "MySpace is a waste of time for everybody except teenage girls!
" Oh wait, I thought it was still 2004...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764775</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255615200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope you just<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ted their PBX<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope you just /.ted their PBX : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope you just /.ted their PBX :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763375</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762953</id>
	<title>Another great marketing idea...</title>
	<author>GameMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1255603020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For all you people that work in marketing for a company that produces mundane products like cars or electronics just put a check box on all communications with your customers asking if it's ok for you to send marketing info to them in the future (like almost every company already does).  Then, for all the ones that have agree, figure out if they have a cat or dog.  Wait until the pet is let out of the house and then deliver a severed cat/dog head (simulated, if local laws prohibit this, but make sure it's the same breed/colors as their real pet) on their front stoop with your product's name carved in it.  They authorized you to contact them didn't they?  How can they, possibly, blame you for any mental trauma they might have?  It is, after all, perfectly reasonable to contact them in <b>any</b> form you can think up <b>right?</b>  After all, you're just being "inventive" and "edgy"...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For all you people that work in marketing for a company that produces mundane products like cars or electronics just put a check box on all communications with your customers asking if it 's ok for you to send marketing info to them in the future ( like almost every company already does ) .
Then , for all the ones that have agree , figure out if they have a cat or dog .
Wait until the pet is let out of the house and then deliver a severed cat/dog head ( simulated , if local laws prohibit this , but make sure it 's the same breed/colors as their real pet ) on their front stoop with your product 's name carved in it .
They authorized you to contact them did n't they ?
How can they , possibly , blame you for any mental trauma they might have ?
It is , after all , perfectly reasonable to contact them in any form you can think up right ?
After all , you 're just being " inventive " and " edgy " .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For all you people that work in marketing for a company that produces mundane products like cars or electronics just put a check box on all communications with your customers asking if it's ok for you to send marketing info to them in the future (like almost every company already does).
Then, for all the ones that have agree, figure out if they have a cat or dog.
Wait until the pet is let out of the house and then deliver a severed cat/dog head (simulated, if local laws prohibit this, but make sure it's the same breed/colors as their real pet) on their front stoop with your product's name carved in it.
They authorized you to contact them didn't they?
How can they, possibly, blame you for any mental trauma they might have?
It is, after all, perfectly reasonable to contact them in any form you can think up right?
After all, you're just being "inventive" and "edgy"...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766705</id>
	<title>Re:Read the damn EULA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255688160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Law trumps contract. Constitution trumps law. International treaties trumps laws.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Law trumps contract .
Constitution trumps law .
International treaties trumps laws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Law trumps contract.
Constitution trumps law.
International treaties trumps laws.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767683</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255702320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Toyota Matrix and the Honda Fit are not really competitors (I suppose the Yaris is the Toyota equivalent).  The Fit is MUCH smaller and has a smaller engine, but it also gets much better gas mileage if you're looking at a commuter car.</p><p>I have personal experience with both and both are good vehicles, but they also serve different purposes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Toyota Matrix and the Honda Fit are not really competitors ( I suppose the Yaris is the Toyota equivalent ) .
The Fit is MUCH smaller and has a smaller engine , but it also gets much better gas mileage if you 're looking at a commuter car.I have personal experience with both and both are good vehicles , but they also serve different purposes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Toyota Matrix and the Honda Fit are not really competitors (I suppose the Yaris is the Toyota equivalent).
The Fit is MUCH smaller and has a smaller engine, but it also gets much better gas mileage if you're looking at a commuter car.I have personal experience with both and both are good vehicles, but they also serve different purposes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762917</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763597</id>
	<title>Is this for real?</title>
	<author>Eminor</author>
	<datestamp>1255606500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't find anything on google news about this besides blogs. Is this a hoax?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't find anything on google news about this besides blogs .
Is this a hoax ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't find anything on google news about this besides blogs.
Is this a hoax?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29777311</id>
	<title>Re:Possible CAN SPAM implications</title>
	<author>Phroggy</author>
	<datestamp>1255792140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think so, and here's why:</p><p><a href="http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/business/ecommerce/bus61.shtm" title="ftc.gov">CAN-SPAM</a> [ftc.gov] defines spam as "any electronic mail message the primary purpose of which is the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service".  Technically, while the purpose of this <i>marketing campaign</i> was to promote Toyota's cars to Ms. Duick's friend, the purpose of <i>these e-mail messages</i> was to scare the crap out of Ms. Duick.</p><p>In my view, the primary purpose of the messages Toyota sent to the victim was not the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service.  Therefore, CAN-SPAM does not apply.</p><p>And neither does the license they tricked her into agreeing to.  I hope she wins the suit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think so , and here 's why : CAN-SPAM [ ftc.gov ] defines spam as " any electronic mail message the primary purpose of which is the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service " .
Technically , while the purpose of this marketing campaign was to promote Toyota 's cars to Ms. Duick 's friend , the purpose of these e-mail messages was to scare the crap out of Ms. Duick.In my view , the primary purpose of the messages Toyota sent to the victim was not the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service .
Therefore , CAN-SPAM does not apply.And neither does the license they tricked her into agreeing to .
I hope she wins the suit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think so, and here's why:CAN-SPAM [ftc.gov] defines spam as "any electronic mail message the primary purpose of which is the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service".
Technically, while the purpose of this marketing campaign was to promote Toyota's cars to Ms. Duick's friend, the purpose of these e-mail messages was to scare the crap out of Ms. Duick.In my view, the primary purpose of the messages Toyota sent to the victim was not the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service.
Therefore, CAN-SPAM does not apply.And neither does the license they tricked her into agreeing to.
I hope she wins the suit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762269</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765627</id>
	<title>Re:Opted In</title>
	<author>wvmarle</author>
	<datestamp>1255625100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anyone have a link to an actual copy of those e-mails Toyota allegedly sent? I am getting more and more curious how a "stalker" message could promote a car brand. Serious.
</p><p>Also to give me an idea how serious this issue can be, really.
</p><p>Are there links in it telling that this comes from Toyota? Opt-out links? Web page links?
</p><p>This simply sounds too strange to be true to me. How can a stalking campaign promote a brand?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone have a link to an actual copy of those e-mails Toyota allegedly sent ?
I am getting more and more curious how a " stalker " message could promote a car brand .
Serious . Also to give me an idea how serious this issue can be , really .
Are there links in it telling that this comes from Toyota ?
Opt-out links ?
Web page links ?
This simply sounds too strange to be true to me .
How can a stalking campaign promote a brand ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone have a link to an actual copy of those e-mails Toyota allegedly sent?
I am getting more and more curious how a "stalker" message could promote a car brand.
Serious.
Also to give me an idea how serious this issue can be, really.
Are there links in it telling that this comes from Toyota?
Opt-out links?
Web page links?
This simply sounds too strange to be true to me.
How can a stalking campaign promote a brand?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762083</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765533</id>
	<title>Re:Possible CAN SPAM implications</title>
	<author>qwertyatwork</author>
	<datestamp>1255624080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember playing this joke on myself because I was concerned it was going over the line before doing it to my friends.  It would have been funny as hell, but way over the line.  There's no opt in, there's no opt out.  It was really creepy and way beyond irresponsible.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember playing this joke on myself because I was concerned it was going over the line before doing it to my friends .
It would have been funny as hell , but way over the line .
There 's no opt in , there 's no opt out .
It was really creepy and way beyond irresponsible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember playing this joke on myself because I was concerned it was going over the line before doing it to my friends.
It would have been funny as hell, but way over the line.
There's no opt in, there's no opt out.
It was really creepy and way beyond irresponsible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762269</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764545</id>
	<title>Ok, um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255613040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone else feel we're not getting the whole story here?  Descriptions of emails and events -- but I saw nothing that sounded threatening.  Then there's the fact that she "made" her boyfriend sleep with a can of mace... but never called the cops.  Methinks there's more here than we're hearing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else feel we 're not getting the whole story here ?
Descriptions of emails and events -- but I saw nothing that sounded threatening .
Then there 's the fact that she " made " her boyfriend sleep with a can of mace... but never called the cops .
Methinks there 's more here than we 're hearing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else feel we're not getting the whole story here?
Descriptions of emails and events -- but I saw nothing that sounded threatening.
Then there's the fact that she "made" her boyfriend sleep with a can of mace... but never called the cops.
Methinks there's more here than we're hearing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762525</id>
	<title>Is your husband home?</title>
	<author>jeffyboz</author>
	<datestamp>1255601340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here's their IM campaign:
toyotamarketing: *heavy breathing*
ambermate: who the hell is this?
toyotamarketing: what are you wearing?
ambermate: i'm calling the police
toyotamarketing: is your husband home?
ambermate: 9-1-1
toyotamarketing: they can't stop me, i'm driving a prius with the all new Pre-Collision System
ambermate: you crazy f\%^k, i have a shotgun
toyotamarketing: i have Driver and front passenger Advanced Airbag System
ambermate: FUCK OFF!!!!!!!!!
toyotamarketing: lol--tell you what?  i won't come over if you come down to the dealership tomorrow...  i'll make you an offer you can't refuse<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's their IM campaign : toyotamarketing : * heavy breathing * ambermate : who the hell is this ?
toyotamarketing : what are you wearing ?
ambermate : i 'm calling the police toyotamarketing : is your husband home ?
ambermate : 9-1-1 toyotamarketing : they ca n't stop me , i 'm driving a prius with the all new Pre-Collision System ambermate : you crazy f \ % ^ k , i have a shotgun toyotamarketing : i have Driver and front passenger Advanced Airbag System ambermate : FUCK OFF ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
toyotamarketing : lol--tell you what ?
i wo n't come over if you come down to the dealership tomorrow... i 'll make you an offer you ca n't refuse ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's their IM campaign:
toyotamarketing: *heavy breathing*
ambermate: who the hell is this?
toyotamarketing: what are you wearing?
ambermate: i'm calling the police
toyotamarketing: is your husband home?
ambermate: 9-1-1
toyotamarketing: they can't stop me, i'm driving a prius with the all new Pre-Collision System
ambermate: you crazy f\%^k, i have a shotgun
toyotamarketing: i have Driver and front passenger Advanced Airbag System
ambermate: FUCK OFF!!!!!!!!!
toyotamarketing: lol--tell you what?
i won't come over if you come down to the dealership tomorrow...  i'll make you an offer you can't refuse ;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766065</id>
	<title>Matrix jokes?</title>
	<author>dropbearsrus</author>
	<datestamp>1255632720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've had a quick scan through the comments and couldn't find any jokes about the Toyota Matrix using its passengers as human batteries for environmentally-friendly power... or about how the automatic traction control system gained sentience and has now started a war against mankind... or about how this lady should've taken the blue pill instead if she just wanted to live her normal boring content life...
</p><p>
What is Slashdot coming to... I thought it was news for <em>nerds</em>?
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've had a quick scan through the comments and could n't find any jokes about the Toyota Matrix using its passengers as human batteries for environmentally-friendly power... or about how the automatic traction control system gained sentience and has now started a war against mankind... or about how this lady should 've taken the blue pill instead if she just wanted to live her normal boring content life.. . What is Slashdot coming to... I thought it was news for nerds ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've had a quick scan through the comments and couldn't find any jokes about the Toyota Matrix using its passengers as human batteries for environmentally-friendly power... or about how the automatic traction control system gained sentience and has now started a war against mankind... or about how this lady should've taken the blue pill instead if she just wanted to live her normal boring content life...

What is Slashdot coming to... I thought it was news for nerds?
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762853</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand advertising</title>
	<author>Dr Caleb</author>
	<datestamp>1255602600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't understand North American business and advertising in general.</p><p>When you want nothing to do with them, they call you during dinner with things you don't want and don't need.  When you do need them, because something is wrong with their product, they let you talk to machines until you get fed up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand North American business and advertising in general.When you want nothing to do with them , they call you during dinner with things you do n't want and do n't need .
When you do need them , because something is wrong with their product , they let you talk to machines until you get fed up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand North American business and advertising in general.When you want nothing to do with them, they call you during dinner with things you don't want and don't need.
When you do need them, because something is wrong with their product, they let you talk to machines until you get fed up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762137</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29791489</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>Chrisje</author>
	<datestamp>1255948260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK... Typical American hyperbolic bullshit, this. A woman opts into something, but she doesn't know what... Then a prank ensues, and person in question is too bone-headed to figure out it's a prank.</p><p>*OBVIOUSLY* that entitles said person to 10.000.000 USD.  This also means you don't buy Toyota cars because *OBVIOUSLY* they're all psychopaths. America is now *outraged* at this life-endangering misconduct. </p><p>Get a grip. This reminds me so much about the "Cat in microwave" and "Hot coffee at McDonald's" lawsuits it makes my eyeballs bleed. It would be very poetic if she was a project manager or hairdresser, because then she and her lawyer would be prime candidates for off-world settlement according to the Douglas Adams Principle.</p><p>From what I can see, the Israeli motto of "Don't be a sucker!" applies here. No more, no less.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK... Typical American hyperbolic bullshit , this .
A woman opts into something , but she does n't know what... Then a prank ensues , and person in question is too bone-headed to figure out it 's a prank .
* OBVIOUSLY * that entitles said person to 10.000.000 USD .
This also means you do n't buy Toyota cars because * OBVIOUSLY * they 're all psychopaths .
America is now * outraged * at this life-endangering misconduct .
Get a grip .
This reminds me so much about the " Cat in microwave " and " Hot coffee at McDonald 's " lawsuits it makes my eyeballs bleed .
It would be very poetic if she was a project manager or hairdresser , because then she and her lawyer would be prime candidates for off-world settlement according to the Douglas Adams Principle.From what I can see , the Israeli motto of " Do n't be a sucker !
" applies here .
No more , no less .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK... Typical American hyperbolic bullshit, this.
A woman opts into something, but she doesn't know what... Then a prank ensues, and person in question is too bone-headed to figure out it's a prank.
*OBVIOUSLY* that entitles said person to 10.000.000 USD.
This also means you don't buy Toyota cars because *OBVIOUSLY* they're all psychopaths.
America is now *outraged* at this life-endangering misconduct.
Get a grip.
This reminds me so much about the "Cat in microwave" and "Hot coffee at McDonald's" lawsuits it makes my eyeballs bleed.
It would be very poetic if she was a project manager or hairdresser, because then she and her lawyer would be prime candidates for off-world settlement according to the Douglas Adams Principle.From what I can see, the Israeli motto of "Don't be a sucker!
" applies here.
No more, no less.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29772849</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255686540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm really quite happy with my 2007 Fit.  I just hit 50 000 km.  I have carried all kinds of home renovation supplies including lumber, garden wall bricks, concrete etc.  I took it on an 11 000 km trip and got great highway mileage with three people on board and all kinds of camping supplies and luggage.  No problems with (yet?).   I'm forty and have a wife and two teenage children.  The Fit is our only (powered) vehicle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm really quite happy with my 2007 Fit .
I just hit 50 000 km .
I have carried all kinds of home renovation supplies including lumber , garden wall bricks , concrete etc .
I took it on an 11 000 km trip and got great highway mileage with three people on board and all kinds of camping supplies and luggage .
No problems with ( yet ? ) .
I 'm forty and have a wife and two teenage children .
The Fit is our only ( powered ) vehicle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm really quite happy with my 2007 Fit.
I just hit 50 000 km.
I have carried all kinds of home renovation supplies including lumber, garden wall bricks, concrete etc.
I took it on an 11 000 km trip and got great highway mileage with three people on board and all kinds of camping supplies and luggage.
No problems with (yet?).
I'm forty and have a wife and two teenage children.
The Fit is our only (powered) vehicle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763071</id>
	<title>She Opted-In For Emails From Toyota</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255603620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The most glaring issue I see is that the woman in question opted in to receive emails from Toyota.  The fact that the emails and communication she received were not clearly from Toyota would seem to bolster her case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The most glaring issue I see is that the woman in question opted in to receive emails from Toyota .
The fact that the emails and communication she received were not clearly from Toyota would seem to bolster her case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most glaring issue I see is that the woman in question opted in to receive emails from Toyota.
The fact that the emails and communication she received were not clearly from Toyota would seem to bolster her case.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762693</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand advertising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255601940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>because the cars were more dependable than American cars.  Now that they are more even people will still associate Americans as bad quality.  Thats what happens when a company is more concerned with high performance than quality.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>because the cars were more dependable than American cars .
Now that they are more even people will still associate Americans as bad quality .
Thats what happens when a company is more concerned with high performance than quality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because the cars were more dependable than American cars.
Now that they are more even people will still associate Americans as bad quality.
Thats what happens when a company is more concerned with high performance than quality.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762137</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29773381</id>
	<title>Hmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255690020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My younger sister had a stalker for a bit.  Most of the stuff he said he was going to do was complete bs, but he managed to freak her out and land himself a short jail sentence just the same.  To a company the size of Toyota, $10m is about the same as getting slapped in the face for being a dick, which seems about right to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My younger sister had a stalker for a bit .
Most of the stuff he said he was going to do was complete bs , but he managed to freak her out and land himself a short jail sentence just the same .
To a company the size of Toyota , $ 10m is about the same as getting slapped in the face for being a dick , which seems about right to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My younger sister had a stalker for a bit.
Most of the stuff he said he was going to do was complete bs, but he managed to freak her out and land himself a short jail sentence just the same.
To a company the size of Toyota, $10m is about the same as getting slapped in the face for being a dick, which seems about right to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762235</id>
	<title>Here is How to Stop This Kind Of Trash:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255600440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By replying to this message, you hereby agree that you will never buy any kind of Toyota vehicle ever again. Forever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By replying to this message , you hereby agree that you will never buy any kind of Toyota vehicle ever again .
Forever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By replying to this message, you hereby agree that you will never buy any kind of Toyota vehicle ever again.
Forever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767881</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255703760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought that the Fit was competition for Toyota's successful <i>Yaris</i> line of subcompact vehicles.  Though I guess that the Toyota Matrix does not have a direct mid-size hatchback competitor from Honda.  So I guess that Toyota delivers where Honda does not.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... aaaaand I think I may have taken the ad-wizard joke too far.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought that the Fit was competition for Toyota 's successful Yaris line of subcompact vehicles .
Though I guess that the Toyota Matrix does not have a direct mid-size hatchback competitor from Honda .
So I guess that Toyota delivers where Honda does not .
... aaaaand I think I may have taken the ad-wizard joke too far .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought that the Fit was competition for Toyota's successful Yaris line of subcompact vehicles.
Though I guess that the Toyota Matrix does not have a direct mid-size hatchback competitor from Honda.
So I guess that Toyota delivers where Honda does not.
... aaaaand I think I may have taken the ad-wizard joke too far.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762917</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766495</id>
	<title>Well, if I ever want to stalk someone for real..</title>
	<author>Chrisq</author>
	<datestamp>1255684200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, if I ever want to stalk someone for real I will send them some survey or something with a link to an obscure terms and conditions document where they "opt in". Nobody can complain then.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if I ever want to stalk someone for real I will send them some survey or something with a link to an obscure terms and conditions document where they " opt in " .
Nobody can complain then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if I ever want to stalk someone for real I will send them some survey or something with a link to an obscure terms and conditions document where they "opt in".
Nobody can complain then.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29769235</id>
	<title>Re:Possible CAN SPAM implications</title>
	<author>ais523</author>
	<datestamp>1255710960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And the real moral of the story is, don't opt in to stupid online quizzes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And the real moral of the story is , do n't opt in to stupid online quizzes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the real moral of the story is, don't opt in to stupid online quizzes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766009</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765745</id>
	<title>You people are unbelievable!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255627200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This woman shouldn't get a dime. Her lawyer claims she shouldn't be bound to the terms of the contract she electronically signed because she didn't understand it? Give me a break. If I don't understand something, I don't sign it, click on it, or anything else other than throw it away. Granted, that gets me into other problems sometimes. Back to the topic at hand though! This was advertising plain and simple. Over the top? Maybe, but we're still talking about it months later, so clearly it was effective.</p><p>I'm truly shocked by how many people say she should get "all of it". She deserves nothing and in fact she should have to pay Toyota's legal fees. After reading this, I think I'm going to go buy me a new Tundra.</p><p>Stupid people suck.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This woman should n't get a dime .
Her lawyer claims she should n't be bound to the terms of the contract she electronically signed because she did n't understand it ?
Give me a break .
If I do n't understand something , I do n't sign it , click on it , or anything else other than throw it away .
Granted , that gets me into other problems sometimes .
Back to the topic at hand though !
This was advertising plain and simple .
Over the top ?
Maybe , but we 're still talking about it months later , so clearly it was effective.I 'm truly shocked by how many people say she should get " all of it " .
She deserves nothing and in fact she should have to pay Toyota 's legal fees .
After reading this , I think I 'm going to go buy me a new Tundra.Stupid people suck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This woman shouldn't get a dime.
Her lawyer claims she shouldn't be bound to the terms of the contract she electronically signed because she didn't understand it?
Give me a break.
If I don't understand something, I don't sign it, click on it, or anything else other than throw it away.
Granted, that gets me into other problems sometimes.
Back to the topic at hand though!
This was advertising plain and simple.
Over the top?
Maybe, but we're still talking about it months later, so clearly it was effective.I'm truly shocked by how many people say she should get "all of it".
She deserves nothing and in fact she should have to pay Toyota's legal fees.
After reading this, I think I'm going to go buy me a new Tundra.Stupid people suck.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764367</id>
	<title>Obviously fake</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255611300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Myspace page claims seems to be someone from England who's obsessed with something called "soccer" - that's about as likely as a septic talking about "Major League Rounders".  And a Myspace user with no "friends"?  C'mon...</p><p>(In other news, Toyota bosses agree that there's no such thing as bad publicity, and the people from Saatchi and Saatchi start shopping for another dead shark).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Myspace page claims seems to be someone from England who 's obsessed with something called " soccer " - that 's about as likely as a septic talking about " Major League Rounders " .
And a Myspace user with no " friends " ?
C'mon... ( In other news , Toyota bosses agree that there 's no such thing as bad publicity , and the people from Saatchi and Saatchi start shopping for another dead shark ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Myspace page claims seems to be someone from England who's obsessed with something called "soccer" - that's about as likely as a septic talking about "Major League Rounders".
And a Myspace user with no "friends"?
C'mon...(In other news, Toyota bosses agree that there's no such thing as bad publicity, and the people from Saatchi and Saatchi start shopping for another dead shark).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29773055</id>
	<title>Re:Commuter cars</title>
	<author>eleuthero</author>
	<datestamp>1255687860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Pontiac Vibe (now only available used) is roughly the same car as the Matrix but the 07 / 08 models both have decent gas mileage (I average 32 - which is above the 08 sticker for combined mileage). It also seems to ride smoother and has the added benefit of being made to Toyota standards without actually being a Toyota. After market additions are also easier to find and cheaper given the street racing following.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Pontiac Vibe ( now only available used ) is roughly the same car as the Matrix but the 07 / 08 models both have decent gas mileage ( I average 32 - which is above the 08 sticker for combined mileage ) .
It also seems to ride smoother and has the added benefit of being made to Toyota standards without actually being a Toyota .
After market additions are also easier to find and cheaper given the street racing following .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Pontiac Vibe (now only available used) is roughly the same car as the Matrix but the 07 / 08 models both have decent gas mileage (I average 32 - which is above the 08 sticker for combined mileage).
It also seems to ride smoother and has the added benefit of being made to Toyota standards without actually being a Toyota.
After market additions are also easier to find and cheaper given the street racing following.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29769729</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35.. so what im 30 who cares</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255713360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF ppl ?!? Why is that people aren't looking at the stupid c*nt bitch trying to gold dig her way into the millions. Give me a freakin break! Companies will ALWAYS advertise and send out shit... if the stupid ass chick didn't understand she was getting into an opt-in then maybe she should have ran the form by one of her money-grubbing lawyers or maybe just NEVER signed up. Its not like Toyota was knocking on her door looking for a signup form to be signed; she SIGNED UP on her own accord!</p><p>People like this disgust me to no end. They should be shot and hung for trying to take advantage of the system.... "sleeplessness" PFFT!..... "poor work performance". This tells me she doesn't like her job and is looking for a way out..</p><p>uggh...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/rant off</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF ppl ? ! ?
Why is that people are n't looking at the stupid c * nt bitch trying to gold dig her way into the millions .
Give me a freakin break !
Companies will ALWAYS advertise and send out shit... if the stupid ass chick did n't understand she was getting into an opt-in then maybe she should have ran the form by one of her money-grubbing lawyers or maybe just NEVER signed up .
Its not like Toyota was knocking on her door looking for a signup form to be signed ; she SIGNED UP on her own accord ! People like this disgust me to no end .
They should be shot and hung for trying to take advantage of the system.... " sleeplessness " PFFT ! .... .
" poor work performance " .
This tells me she does n't like her job and is looking for a way out..uggh... /rant off</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF ppl ?!?
Why is that people aren't looking at the stupid c*nt bitch trying to gold dig her way into the millions.
Give me a freakin break!
Companies will ALWAYS advertise and send out shit... if the stupid ass chick didn't understand she was getting into an opt-in then maybe she should have ran the form by one of her money-grubbing lawyers or maybe just NEVER signed up.
Its not like Toyota was knocking on her door looking for a signup form to be signed; she SIGNED UP on her own accord!People like this disgust me to no end.
They should be shot and hung for trying to take advantage of the system.... "sleeplessness" PFFT!.....
"poor work performance".
This tells me she doesn't like her job and is looking for a way out..uggh... /rant off</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762163</id>
	<title>Person's time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255600200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>let's say she is due something  - my bet is loss of work productivity is not worth $10M - surely this value has to be justified somehow?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>let 's say she is due something - my bet is loss of work productivity is not worth $ 10M - surely this value has to be justified somehow ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>let's say she is due something  - my bet is loss of work productivity is not worth $10M - surely this value has to be justified somehow?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763825</id>
	<title>Commuter cars</title>
	<author>KalvinB</author>
	<datestamp>1255607940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I highly recommend the Versa if you're looking for cheap and fuel efficient.  The EPA estimate is 31mpg, I get around 39mpg with a 50 mile commute to and from work.  I got the 2009 base model ($9990) which is manual, no AC and no radio.  I live in Phoenix so yes, I considered the AC thing.  Installing a radio yourself is cheaper than having the factory do it.  With only three months of unbearable heat I just drove in the mornings and evenings with the window down.  It's only during the day that it really sucks to drive.  The rest of the year I can drive all day long and not miss AC.</p><p>I may be wrong but I'm pretty sure the significantly improved MPG is due to not having to power a compressor for the AC.  It's certainly not because of my driving style.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I highly recommend the Versa if you 're looking for cheap and fuel efficient .
The EPA estimate is 31mpg , I get around 39mpg with a 50 mile commute to and from work .
I got the 2009 base model ( $ 9990 ) which is manual , no AC and no radio .
I live in Phoenix so yes , I considered the AC thing .
Installing a radio yourself is cheaper than having the factory do it .
With only three months of unbearable heat I just drove in the mornings and evenings with the window down .
It 's only during the day that it really sucks to drive .
The rest of the year I can drive all day long and not miss AC.I may be wrong but I 'm pretty sure the significantly improved MPG is due to not having to power a compressor for the AC .
It 's certainly not because of my driving style .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I highly recommend the Versa if you're looking for cheap and fuel efficient.
The EPA estimate is 31mpg, I get around 39mpg with a 50 mile commute to and from work.
I got the 2009 base model ($9990) which is manual, no AC and no radio.
I live in Phoenix so yes, I considered the AC thing.
Installing a radio yourself is cheaper than having the factory do it.
With only three months of unbearable heat I just drove in the mornings and evenings with the window down.
It's only during the day that it really sucks to drive.
The rest of the year I can drive all day long and not miss AC.I may be wrong but I'm pretty sure the significantly improved MPG is due to not having to power a compressor for the AC.
It's certainly not because of my driving style.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762507</id>
	<title>Uhh, more info?</title>
	<author>RightSaidFred99</author>
	<datestamp>1255601340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I read this before but haven't seen jack shit in terms of details.  What was in the actual mail?  Was it obviously fake/advertising or was it real-seaming?  Why anyone would pay attention to random shit they get in email I'll never know, but does anyone have a link to the actual mails?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read this before but have n't seen jack shit in terms of details .
What was in the actual mail ?
Was it obviously fake/advertising or was it real-seaming ?
Why anyone would pay attention to random shit they get in email I 'll never know , but does anyone have a link to the actual mails ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read this before but haven't seen jack shit in terms of details.
What was in the actual mail?
Was it obviously fake/advertising or was it real-seaming?
Why anyone would pay attention to random shit they get in email I'll never know, but does anyone have a link to the actual mails?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762269</id>
	<title>Possible CAN SPAM implications</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255600560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>So either she didn't see the opt-out links or address of the company, or the email didn't have these. Unless they got really creative with the opt-in, this sounds like a violation of the CAN SPAM act. A $10M lawsuit from one woman is the least of their worries.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So either she did n't see the opt-out links or address of the company , or the email did n't have these .
Unless they got really creative with the opt-in , this sounds like a violation of the CAN SPAM act .
A $ 10M lawsuit from one woman is the least of their worries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So either she didn't see the opt-out links or address of the company, or the email didn't have these.
Unless they got really creative with the opt-in, this sounds like a violation of the CAN SPAM act.
A $10M lawsuit from one woman is the least of their worries.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763811</id>
	<title>Probably a fake woman.</title>
	<author>Exception Duck</author>
	<datestamp>1255607880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably a fake woman.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably a fake woman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably a fake woman.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765835</id>
	<title>Hai thar</title>
	<author>CapnStank</author>
	<datestamp>1255628160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>From: marketing@toyota.com<br>
Subject: I'ma get joo!</b> <br> <br>
Dear subscriber,<br>
We know where you live. We are coming with our ALL NEW TOYOTA MATRIX WITH SEATING FOR 5, FULLY LOADED, LEATHER INTERIOR to take your children away in our FIVE STAR SAFETY TESTED FAMILY SEDAN!<br> <br>
Don't try to run, we'll still find you with our GPS NAVIGATION SYSTEM!<br> <br>
Stalkingly yours,<br>
Joe
<br> <br>
<i>Please click <b>here</b> to remove yourself from these Toyota promotional messages</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>From : marketing @ toyota.com Subject : I'ma get joo !
Dear subscriber , We know where you live .
We are coming with our ALL NEW TOYOTA MATRIX WITH SEATING FOR 5 , FULLY LOADED , LEATHER INTERIOR to take your children away in our FIVE STAR SAFETY TESTED FAMILY SEDAN !
Do n't try to run , we 'll still find you with our GPS NAVIGATION SYSTEM !
Stalkingly yours , Joe Please click here to remove yourself from these Toyota promotional messages</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From: marketing@toyota.com
Subject: I'ma get joo!
Dear subscriber,
We know where you live.
We are coming with our ALL NEW TOYOTA MATRIX WITH SEATING FOR 5, FULLY LOADED, LEATHER INTERIOR to take your children away in our FIVE STAR SAFETY TESTED FAMILY SEDAN!
Don't try to run, we'll still find you with our GPS NAVIGATION SYSTEM!
Stalkingly yours,
Joe
 
Please click here to remove yourself from these Toyota promotional messages</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767243</id>
	<title>Re:You people are unbelievable!</title>
	<author>verbatim</author>
	<datestamp>1255697520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whether she should or should not get money is up to the courts, of course.</p><p>Fictitious scenario:</p><p>- person A opts-in to "prank" campaign and provides e-mail address of person B<br>- person B receives an e-mail from person A telling them of a survey<br>- person B completes the survey based on a trust-relationship with person A (otherwise, they'd probably just delete the e-mail)</p><p>Questions:</p><p>If the survey page was overtly deceptive as to it's intent (e.g. a "personality" survey for a car advertisement campaign), is it at all reasonable to assume that person B will become a FOCUSED target of an advertisement campaign? Furthermore, has person B provided informed consent - that is, did this person have full knowledge of the intended use of her personal information (e-mail address and any other information that may have been provided)?</p><p>The final question is: who is responsible? In my mind it's person A, the "friend" in the original story, because this person provided full informed consent AND was the reason that person B became involved at all. Without their direct action, person B would not have been involved.</p><p>Then again, seeing Ford+Advertising Company on the hook for a stupid marketing campaign wouldn't be terrible either.</p><p>Just my 2 cents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whether she should or should not get money is up to the courts , of course.Fictitious scenario : - person A opts-in to " prank " campaign and provides e-mail address of person B- person B receives an e-mail from person A telling them of a survey- person B completes the survey based on a trust-relationship with person A ( otherwise , they 'd probably just delete the e-mail ) Questions : If the survey page was overtly deceptive as to it 's intent ( e.g .
a " personality " survey for a car advertisement campaign ) , is it at all reasonable to assume that person B will become a FOCUSED target of an advertisement campaign ?
Furthermore , has person B provided informed consent - that is , did this person have full knowledge of the intended use of her personal information ( e-mail address and any other information that may have been provided ) ? The final question is : who is responsible ?
In my mind it 's person A , the " friend " in the original story , because this person provided full informed consent AND was the reason that person B became involved at all .
Without their direct action , person B would not have been involved.Then again , seeing Ford + Advertising Company on the hook for a stupid marketing campaign would n't be terrible either.Just my 2 cents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whether she should or should not get money is up to the courts, of course.Fictitious scenario:- person A opts-in to "prank" campaign and provides e-mail address of person B- person B receives an e-mail from person A telling them of a survey- person B completes the survey based on a trust-relationship with person A (otherwise, they'd probably just delete the e-mail)Questions:If the survey page was overtly deceptive as to it's intent (e.g.
a "personality" survey for a car advertisement campaign), is it at all reasonable to assume that person B will become a FOCUSED target of an advertisement campaign?
Furthermore, has person B provided informed consent - that is, did this person have full knowledge of the intended use of her personal information (e-mail address and any other information that may have been provided)?The final question is: who is responsible?
In my mind it's person A, the "friend" in the original story, because this person provided full informed consent AND was the reason that person B became involved at all.
Without their direct action, person B would not have been involved.Then again, seeing Ford+Advertising Company on the hook for a stupid marketing campaign wouldn't be terrible either.Just my 2 cents.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765745</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763835</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand advertising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255608060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not that hard to understand... they call you when they want you to buy something, and they run away when you might cost them money to fix something they sold you? How is that hard to understand?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not that hard to understand... they call you when they want you to buy something , and they run away when you might cost them money to fix something they sold you ?
How is that hard to understand ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not that hard to understand... they call you when they want you to buy something, and they run away when you might cost them money to fix something they sold you?
How is that hard to understand?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762853</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762951</id>
	<title>Re:Read the damn EULA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255603020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And once again for those of you who are incredible dense<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>JUST BECAUSE YOU PUT IT IN A CONTRACT AND GET SOMEONE TO SIGN IT DOESN'T MAKE IT LEGALLY BINDING.</p><p>We've been over this, it in fact was one of the factors that lead to the civil war, after which we (the USA) made efforts to make it so a bullshit contract could no longer be considered valid.</p><p>The right to freedom in America should only be given to those who care enough to understand what having and protecting that right means, your right to freedom would most certainly be revoked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And once again for those of you who are incredible dense ...JUST BECAUSE YOU PUT IT IN A CONTRACT AND GET SOMEONE TO SIGN IT DOES N'T MAKE IT LEGALLY BINDING.We 've been over this , it in fact was one of the factors that lead to the civil war , after which we ( the USA ) made efforts to make it so a bullshit contract could no longer be considered valid.The right to freedom in America should only be given to those who care enough to understand what having and protecting that right means , your right to freedom would most certainly be revoked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And once again for those of you who are incredible dense ...JUST BECAUSE YOU PUT IT IN A CONTRACT AND GET SOMEONE TO SIGN IT DOESN'T MAKE IT LEGALLY BINDING.We've been over this, it in fact was one of the factors that lead to the civil war, after which we (the USA) made efforts to make it so a bullshit contract could no longer be considered valid.The right to freedom in America should only be given to those who care enough to understand what having and protecting that right means, your right to freedom would most certainly be revoked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762343</id>
	<title>Props to Toyota as long as the Formula holds true</title>
	<author>ViennaSt</author>
	<datestamp>1255600800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Creative marketing scores free publicity from a major news network (which will be copied by another, another I'm sure.)  Most companies might pay 10 million for that. Applying the (Durden) formula -</p><p>A new marketing campaign built by my company punks people over the email. Someone gets offended, looses sleep even, and decides to sue for damages. But, the new marketing strategy also spreads word of mouth, people go check it out sign up, stories get posted on major new sites that ones that post stuff that matters.<br>Now:<br>should Toyota initiate a recall of their marketing campaign? Take the number of punked ads in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, Toyota doesn't do one. (ie. If the cost of potential mitigation over crazy lawsuits is still less then the revenue generated from increased public awareness of their product-ego-props to Toyota.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Creative marketing scores free publicity from a major news network ( which will be copied by another , another I 'm sure .
) Most companies might pay 10 million for that .
Applying the ( Durden ) formula -A new marketing campaign built by my company punks people over the email .
Someone gets offended , looses sleep even , and decides to sue for damages .
But , the new marketing strategy also spreads word of mouth , people go check it out sign up , stories get posted on major new sites that ones that post stuff that matters.Now : should Toyota initiate a recall of their marketing campaign ?
Take the number of punked ads in the field , A , multiply by the probable rate of failure , B , multiply by the average out-of-court settlement , C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall , Toyota does n't do one .
( ie. If the cost of potential mitigation over crazy lawsuits is still less then the revenue generated from increased public awareness of their product-ego-props to Toyota .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Creative marketing scores free publicity from a major news network (which will be copied by another, another I'm sure.
)  Most companies might pay 10 million for that.
Applying the (Durden) formula -A new marketing campaign built by my company punks people over the email.
Someone gets offended, looses sleep even, and decides to sue for damages.
But, the new marketing strategy also spreads word of mouth, people go check it out sign up, stories get posted on major new sites that ones that post stuff that matters.Now:should Toyota initiate a recall of their marketing campaign?
Take the number of punked ads in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, Toyota doesn't do one.
(ie. If the cost of potential mitigation over crazy lawsuits is still less then the revenue generated from increased public awareness of their product-ego-props to Toyota.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763221</id>
	<title>Re:Scared?</title>
	<author>Mashiki</author>
	<datestamp>1255604340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Advertising is fine, but as soon as you cross that line from advertising into the land of criminal harassment then we've got a serious problem.  While I'm up in Canada, I'd be much happier to see criminal harassment charges filed against the entire company.  See unless you've actually dealt with people who've been victims of this stuff, seen how the system has failed people, and how the ball has been dropped you really don't have a clue as to what can go wrong.</p><p>I don't have any problems with her going after them for this.  Not only did they cross the line, they crossed the line into a felony in my book.  "Opting in" be damned, you're either dense, or simply heartless if you think that way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Advertising is fine , but as soon as you cross that line from advertising into the land of criminal harassment then we 've got a serious problem .
While I 'm up in Canada , I 'd be much happier to see criminal harassment charges filed against the entire company .
See unless you 've actually dealt with people who 've been victims of this stuff , seen how the system has failed people , and how the ball has been dropped you really do n't have a clue as to what can go wrong.I do n't have any problems with her going after them for this .
Not only did they cross the line , they crossed the line into a felony in my book .
" Opting in " be damned , you 're either dense , or simply heartless if you think that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Advertising is fine, but as soon as you cross that line from advertising into the land of criminal harassment then we've got a serious problem.
While I'm up in Canada, I'd be much happier to see criminal harassment charges filed against the entire company.
See unless you've actually dealt with people who've been victims of this stuff, seen how the system has failed people, and how the ball has been dropped you really don't have a clue as to what can go wrong.I don't have any problems with her going after them for this.
Not only did they cross the line, they crossed the line into a felony in my book.
"Opting in" be damned, you're either dense, or simply heartless if you think that way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762603</id>
	<title>Re:Advertising these days...</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1255601640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Behold, all you unwashed, the spectacles of "service economy".  What you expect?  We can't all be scientists and engineers and film producers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Behold , all you unwashed , the spectacles of " service economy " .
What you expect ?
We ca n't all be scientists and engineers and film producers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Behold, all you unwashed, the spectacles of "service economy".
What you expect?
We can't all be scientists and engineers and film producers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762917</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255602840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> I was leaning toward a small Honda anyway</p></div><p>Would that be the Honda <i>Fit</i>?  It's a small, 5-door competitor to the Toyota Matrix which outperforms it in all customer satisfaction metrics, as well as fuel efficiency and crash safety.  Plus, instead of steel, it's made of chocolate.  Delicious AND biodegradable.

<br> <br> <br> <br> <br>Don't tell anyone that we're 'turfing for Honda's PR company!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was leaning toward a small Honda anywayWould that be the Honda Fit ?
It 's a small , 5-door competitor to the Toyota Matrix which outperforms it in all customer satisfaction metrics , as well as fuel efficiency and crash safety .
Plus , instead of steel , it 's made of chocolate .
Delicious AND biodegradable .
Do n't tell anyone that we 're 'turfing for Honda 's PR company !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I was leaning toward a small Honda anywayWould that be the Honda Fit?
It's a small, 5-door competitor to the Toyota Matrix which outperforms it in all customer satisfaction metrics, as well as fuel efficiency and crash safety.
Plus, instead of steel, it's made of chocolate.
Delicious AND biodegradable.
Don't tell anyone that we're 'turfing for Honda's PR company!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762627</id>
	<title>Hooliganism</title>
	<author>sweatyboatman</author>
	<datestamp>1255601700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A young, british male wandering around the US, lamenting on his MySpace page that there's no good soccer?</p><p>Not sure where the plug for the car was supposed to be, but I am betting this was supposed to be targeted towards fanatical soccer fans (pardon my redundancy).</p><p>The quotes in the article make it sound like the guy is touring around the country and maybe looking for places to crash.  Perhaps with sympathetic fellow soccer lovers.</p><p>Unless there are some quotes that weren't included in the article, I'd say the menace this woman felt when reading these emails was entirely of her own making.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A young , british male wandering around the US , lamenting on his MySpace page that there 's no good soccer ? Not sure where the plug for the car was supposed to be , but I am betting this was supposed to be targeted towards fanatical soccer fans ( pardon my redundancy ) .The quotes in the article make it sound like the guy is touring around the country and maybe looking for places to crash .
Perhaps with sympathetic fellow soccer lovers.Unless there are some quotes that were n't included in the article , I 'd say the menace this woman felt when reading these emails was entirely of her own making .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A young, british male wandering around the US, lamenting on his MySpace page that there's no good soccer?Not sure where the plug for the car was supposed to be, but I am betting this was supposed to be targeted towards fanatical soccer fans (pardon my redundancy).The quotes in the article make it sound like the guy is touring around the country and maybe looking for places to crash.
Perhaps with sympathetic fellow soccer lovers.Unless there are some quotes that weren't included in the article, I'd say the menace this woman felt when reading these emails was entirely of her own making.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29769139</id>
	<title>Re:Read the damn EULA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255710360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The right to freedom in America should only be given to those who care enough to understand what having and protecting that right means, your right to freedom would most certainly be revoked.</p></div><p>Freedom already was, is and will continue to be revoked.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The right to freedom in America should only be given to those who care enough to understand what having and protecting that right means , your right to freedom would most certainly be revoked.Freedom already was , is and will continue to be revoked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The right to freedom in America should only be given to those who care enough to understand what having and protecting that right means, your right to freedom would most certainly be revoked.Freedom already was, is and will continue to be revoked.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767541</id>
	<title>Re:I'm over 35</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255701000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Would that be the Honda Fit?</p></div></blockquote><p>No.  The chocolate version is the Honda <i>Fat</i>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would that be the Honda Fit ? No .
The chocolate version is the Honda Fat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would that be the Honda Fit?No.
The chocolate version is the Honda Fat.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762917</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762971</id>
	<title>Translation</title>
	<author>magus\_melchior</author>
	<datestamp>1255603140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The person who made this claim specifically opted in, granting her permission to receive campaign emails and other communications from Toyota."</p><p>Ah, so he means:<br>"My boss told me, 'OH, SHIT! TELL THEM SOMETHING, ANYTHING! MAKE THIS GO AWAY!!'"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The person who made this claim specifically opted in , granting her permission to receive campaign emails and other communications from Toyota .
" Ah , so he means : " My boss told me , 'OH , SHIT !
TELL THEM SOMETHING , ANYTHING !
MAKE THIS GO AWAY ! !
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The person who made this claim specifically opted in, granting her permission to receive campaign emails and other communications from Toyota.
"Ah, so he means:"My boss told me, 'OH, SHIT!
TELL THEM SOMETHING, ANYTHING!
MAKE THIS GO AWAY!!
'"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765931</id>
	<title>Re:Read the damn EULA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255629660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did you miss the part where he made it a joke? Read it again real quick, have a chuckle or two, and if you didn't see the part about humping hamsters, reread it but slower this time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you miss the part where he made it a joke ?
Read it again real quick , have a chuckle or two , and if you did n't see the part about humping hamsters , reread it but slower this time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you miss the part where he made it a joke?
Read it again real quick, have a chuckle or two, and if you didn't see the part about humping hamsters, reread it but slower this time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762149</id>
	<title>deception psychology experiment waiver</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255600140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This reminds of a psychology experiment a few decades ago, where the consent form was something like:</p><p>I agree to *insert a bunch of things here* including "I agree to be deceived."</p><p>Then you became the subject of an experiment that appeared to be one of the other things, but in reality, you were being deceived as part of the experiment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This reminds of a psychology experiment a few decades ago , where the consent form was something like : I agree to * insert a bunch of things here * including " I agree to be deceived .
" Then you became the subject of an experiment that appeared to be one of the other things , but in reality , you were being deceived as part of the experiment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This reminds of a psychology experiment a few decades ago, where the consent form was something like:I agree to *insert a bunch of things here* including "I agree to be deceived.
"Then you became the subject of an experiment that appeared to be one of the other things, but in reality, you were being deceived as part of the experiment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763707</id>
	<title>Safe word?</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1255607160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What was the Safe Word, Toyota?  If she really opted in, there was one.  I bet you they'll say next that when she said "no", she really meant "yes", so it was consensual.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What was the Safe Word , Toyota ?
If she really opted in , there was one .
I bet you they 'll say next that when she said " no " , she really meant " yes " , so it was consensual .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What was the Safe Word, Toyota?
If she really opted in, there was one.
I bet you they'll say next that when she said "no", she really meant "yes", so it was consensual.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766599
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29769123
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762083
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762223
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763845
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765689
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762269
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765533
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762083
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762209
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762625
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763127
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765127
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762731
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762917
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762603
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29768739
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762373
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763909
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762083
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762693
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763083
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763375
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766285
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767913
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762269
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29777311
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762917
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766705
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762083
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762873
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763413
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29774445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767695
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29769729
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29768195
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762917
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767683
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29771063
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29775123
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763375
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29768631
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762373
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763221
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762373
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762729
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762595
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766101
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767241
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762917
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765745
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762669
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29773055
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29846337
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762705
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766583
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767949
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766777
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765931
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29772849
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762625
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763205
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762269
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29770955
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764089
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764805
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762621
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29769139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763375
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764775
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763835
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762083
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762629
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762269
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29769235
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762449
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767013
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762625
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763831
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762357
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762937
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763791
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762083
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767533
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762917
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29770621
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29791489
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762373
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763111
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762083
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2027250_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765745
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767243
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766537
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762137
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764805
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762693
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762853
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767755
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767695
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29768739
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766641
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29846337
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763835
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762149
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762669
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763083
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763159
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762167
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762951
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767241
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767773
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29769139
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765931
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765127
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766583
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766777
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767913
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763845
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763655
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766705
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762151
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762003
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762507
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762479
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765081
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762705
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767257
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762269
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29777311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766009
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29769235
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29770955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765533
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762133
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763125
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29771063
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762731
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763413
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762603
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762625
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763127
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763831
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763205
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764089
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29775123
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766101
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763339
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764751
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766883
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762433
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764545
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762083
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763027
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762209
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762873
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765627
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762223
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767533
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762629
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762759
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762373
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763111
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763221
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763909
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762729
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762061
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762595
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762621
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29769729
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762293
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29791489
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763791
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762917
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767881
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29770621
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767683
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767541
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767303
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29772849
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29765689
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763825
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29773055
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767949
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29763375
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766285
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29764775
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29768631
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762449
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29767013
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29766599
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29769123
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762681
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29774445
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762357
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762937
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2027250.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762343
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29762903
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2027250.29768195
</commentlist>
</conversation>
