<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_15_0442259</id>
	<title>Michael Dell Says Windows 7 Will Make You Love PCs</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1255607820000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>ruphus13 writes <i>"In a recent talk at the Churchill Club, Michael Dell addressed several topics, including the fact that <a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/13/michael-dell-talks-up-services-and-coming-upgrades-but-trashes-netbooks/">Windows 7 is poised to take advantage of the upgrade cycle</a>.  Dell has always been a strong MS OEM ally and it is now hoping to cash in again from the impending upgrades.  From the post: 'Dell made plain several times that he sees the installed base of technology as very old, and sees a coming "refresh cycle" for which he has high hopes. "The latest generation of chips from Intel is strong, particularly Nehalem," he said, adding, "and Windows 7 is on its way." (The operating system arrives Oct. 22nd, although Microsoft's large-volume licensees are already getting it.) He pointed out that many business are running Windows XP, which is eight years old.  "I've been using Windows 7 for a long time now," he said, "and if you get the latest processor technology and Office 2010 with it, you will love your PC again. It's a dramatic improvement."'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>ruphus13 writes " In a recent talk at the Churchill Club , Michael Dell addressed several topics , including the fact that Windows 7 is poised to take advantage of the upgrade cycle .
Dell has always been a strong MS OEM ally and it is now hoping to cash in again from the impending upgrades .
From the post : 'Dell made plain several times that he sees the installed base of technology as very old , and sees a coming " refresh cycle " for which he has high hopes .
" The latest generation of chips from Intel is strong , particularly Nehalem , " he said , adding , " and Windows 7 is on its way .
" ( The operating system arrives Oct. 22nd , although Microsoft 's large-volume licensees are already getting it .
) He pointed out that many business are running Windows XP , which is eight years old .
" I 've been using Windows 7 for a long time now , " he said , " and if you get the latest processor technology and Office 2010 with it , you will love your PC again .
It 's a dramatic improvement .
" ' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ruphus13 writes "In a recent talk at the Churchill Club, Michael Dell addressed several topics, including the fact that Windows 7 is poised to take advantage of the upgrade cycle.
Dell has always been a strong MS OEM ally and it is now hoping to cash in again from the impending upgrades.
From the post: 'Dell made plain several times that he sees the installed base of technology as very old, and sees a coming "refresh cycle" for which he has high hopes.
"The latest generation of chips from Intel is strong, particularly Nehalem," he said, adding, "and Windows 7 is on its way.
" (The operating system arrives Oct. 22nd, although Microsoft's large-volume licensees are already getting it.
) He pointed out that many business are running Windows XP, which is eight years old.
"I've been using Windows 7 for a long time now," he said, "and if you get the latest processor technology and Office 2010 with it, you will love your PC again.
It's a dramatic improvement.
"'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755709</id>
	<title>Not yet.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255614240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll love Windows again when they switch to LF for newline, '/' for file separator, and ':' for path separator.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll love Windows again when they switch to LF for newline , '/ ' for file separator , and ' : ' for path separator .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll love Windows again when they switch to LF for newline, '/' for file separator, and ':' for path separator.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29761961</id>
	<title>Windows 7</title>
	<author>kregg</author>
	<datestamp>1255599300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Features (that I could see in 1 hour of use) -

- A bit better then XP, a lot better than Vista
- New splash screen
- Start button lights up with lots of colours
- Can't change the start menu to XP style

Overall, please stop ramming Windows 7 down our throats, if it really is that good let it speak for itself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Features ( that I could see in 1 hour of use ) - - A bit better then XP , a lot better than Vista - New splash screen - Start button lights up with lots of colours - Ca n't change the start menu to XP style Overall , please stop ramming Windows 7 down our throats , if it really is that good let it speak for itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Features (that I could see in 1 hour of use) -

- A bit better then XP, a lot better than Vista
- New splash screen
- Start button lights up with lots of colours
- Can't change the start menu to XP style

Overall, please stop ramming Windows 7 down our throats, if it really is that good let it speak for itself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756781</id>
	<title>Michael Dell: Vista will win out in two years</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255619460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In 2007 Michael Dell said that Vista will win out in two years. It's 2009 now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In 2007 Michael Dell said that Vista will win out in two years .
It 's 2009 now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In 2007 Michael Dell said that Vista will win out in two years.
It's 2009 now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29763223</id>
	<title>Given that Intel has built AMT into their chips ..</title>
	<author>Ungrounded Lightning</author>
	<datestamp>1255604340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... I'll not be buying machines with Intel processors.</p><p>Last thing in the world I need in my machine is a built-in hunk of big-brother remote-sniff-and-poke hardware between my processor and its network port and other I/O. Peek and poke UNDER the operating system and out of its control or view.  "The Matrix Has My Laptop."  Worse than the Blue Pill virtualization hack.</p><p>Look up "Intel AMT" and its subset "CIRA".  (My tinfoil hat spun clear around when reading THOSE documents.)</p><p>And how do I know it's disabled?  The proprietary BIOS TELLS me so?  Yeah, right!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... I 'll not be buying machines with Intel processors.Last thing in the world I need in my machine is a built-in hunk of big-brother remote-sniff-and-poke hardware between my processor and its network port and other I/O .
Peek and poke UNDER the operating system and out of its control or view .
" The Matrix Has My Laptop .
" Worse than the Blue Pill virtualization hack.Look up " Intel AMT " and its subset " CIRA " .
( My tinfoil hat spun clear around when reading THOSE documents .
) And how do I know it 's disabled ?
The proprietary BIOS TELLS me so ?
Yeah , right !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... I'll not be buying machines with Intel processors.Last thing in the world I need in my machine is a built-in hunk of big-brother remote-sniff-and-poke hardware between my processor and its network port and other I/O.
Peek and poke UNDER the operating system and out of its control or view.
"The Matrix Has My Laptop.
"  Worse than the Blue Pill virtualization hack.Look up "Intel AMT" and its subset "CIRA".
(My tinfoil hat spun clear around when reading THOSE documents.
)And how do I know it's disabled?
The proprietary BIOS TELLS me so?
Yeah, right!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755427</id>
	<title>Re:Balance Sheet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255611960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course he'll say that, but your price comparison is unfair. A Dell package of oem software/hardware will certainly be cheaper than you are suggesting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course he 'll say that , but your price comparison is unfair .
A Dell package of oem software/hardware will certainly be cheaper than you are suggesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course he'll say that, but your price comparison is unfair.
A Dell package of oem software/hardware will certainly be cheaper than you are suggesting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755383</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755617</id>
	<title>bullshit advice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255613580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have first hand experience. I've used Windows 7 RTM, and office 2010 technical preview I can honestly say that this advice is nothing more than a joke.

In fact the 'type mismatch' errors that Autodesk Inventor throws up when syncing to Excel, make me lean more towards hateful feelings.

Win7 / office 2010 are good and expensive, but i don't see how they are justifiably better than XP / office 2003/7.

The love inducing factor comes from Michael Dell rubbing his grubby mitts together.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have first hand experience .
I 've used Windows 7 RTM , and office 2010 technical preview I can honestly say that this advice is nothing more than a joke .
In fact the 'type mismatch ' errors that Autodesk Inventor throws up when syncing to Excel , make me lean more towards hateful feelings .
Win7 / office 2010 are good and expensive , but i do n't see how they are justifiably better than XP / office 2003/7 .
The love inducing factor comes from Michael Dell rubbing his grubby mitts together .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have first hand experience.
I've used Windows 7 RTM, and office 2010 technical preview I can honestly say that this advice is nothing more than a joke.
In fact the 'type mismatch' errors that Autodesk Inventor throws up when syncing to Excel, make me lean more towards hateful feelings.
Win7 / office 2010 are good and expensive, but i don't see how they are justifiably better than XP / office 2003/7.
The love inducing factor comes from Michael Dell rubbing his grubby mitts together.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758983</id>
	<title>good reason to avoid Dell</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255628520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, now I have a good reason NOT to buy a Dell computer!  bb</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , now I have a good reason NOT to buy a Dell computer !
bb</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, now I have a good reason NOT to buy a Dell computer!
bb</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755799</id>
	<title>Dramatic Improvement</title>
	<author>whisper\_jeff</author>
	<datestamp>1255614600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...if you get the latest processor technology and Office 2010 with it, you will love your PC again. It's a dramatic improvement.</p></div><p>
Ok, I'm a graphic designer who often works with photoshop files that are 500 meg or larger (files in the 1 gig+ range are not uncommon at all). For me, having a fast processor, a lot of ram, and the other bells and whistles that go along with it will make a "dramatic improvement" because we're talking about a massive file and long processing times for each action I take. When you're using Office - you know, a word processing program, a spreadsheet program, and a presentation program - you shouldn't need the latest and greatest. Sorry, but I just feel that needing the latest and greatest so that you can "love your PC again" when all you're using is an office suite just might be a sign that the office suite is bloated well beyond what is required.<br> <br>
My two cents. They're Canadian cents so take 'em for what they're worth, eh.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...if you get the latest processor technology and Office 2010 with it , you will love your PC again .
It 's a dramatic improvement .
Ok , I 'm a graphic designer who often works with photoshop files that are 500 meg or larger ( files in the 1 gig + range are not uncommon at all ) .
For me , having a fast processor , a lot of ram , and the other bells and whistles that go along with it will make a " dramatic improvement " because we 're talking about a massive file and long processing times for each action I take .
When you 're using Office - you know , a word processing program , a spreadsheet program , and a presentation program - you should n't need the latest and greatest .
Sorry , but I just feel that needing the latest and greatest so that you can " love your PC again " when all you 're using is an office suite just might be a sign that the office suite is bloated well beyond what is required .
My two cents .
They 're Canadian cents so take 'em for what they 're worth , eh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...if you get the latest processor technology and Office 2010 with it, you will love your PC again.
It's a dramatic improvement.
Ok, I'm a graphic designer who often works with photoshop files that are 500 meg or larger (files in the 1 gig+ range are not uncommon at all).
For me, having a fast processor, a lot of ram, and the other bells and whistles that go along with it will make a "dramatic improvement" because we're talking about a massive file and long processing times for each action I take.
When you're using Office - you know, a word processing program, a spreadsheet program, and a presentation program - you shouldn't need the latest and greatest.
Sorry, but I just feel that needing the latest and greatest so that you can "love your PC again" when all you're using is an office suite just might be a sign that the office suite is bloated well beyond what is required.
My two cents.
They're Canadian cents so take 'em for what they're worth, eh.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755603</id>
	<title>What upgrade cycle?</title>
	<author>will\_die</author>
	<datestamp>1255613460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I upgraded to a decent middle/upper home built and overclocked system with a cheap video card when Vista was first released.  Using it mainly for gaming and serving virtual servers and frankly besides a newer video card I don't need an upgrade.<br>
I usally did the 2.5/3 year desktop upgrade cycle but I can run modern games with high graphics on a 21 monitor, and don't see a need to upgrade that.  Windows 7 is suppose to running faster then Vista, if I decide to upgrade, and I can run multiple virtual machines with memory being the problem.<br>
There is no need for average consumer upgrade if they have purchased anything with a dual code processor, and since a new windows upgrade was a major money point for Dell in the past they must be running scared and you can expect them to make comments like this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I upgraded to a decent middle/upper home built and overclocked system with a cheap video card when Vista was first released .
Using it mainly for gaming and serving virtual servers and frankly besides a newer video card I do n't need an upgrade .
I usally did the 2.5/3 year desktop upgrade cycle but I can run modern games with high graphics on a 21 monitor , and do n't see a need to upgrade that .
Windows 7 is suppose to running faster then Vista , if I decide to upgrade , and I can run multiple virtual machines with memory being the problem .
There is no need for average consumer upgrade if they have purchased anything with a dual code processor , and since a new windows upgrade was a major money point for Dell in the past they must be running scared and you can expect them to make comments like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I upgraded to a decent middle/upper home built and overclocked system with a cheap video card when Vista was first released.
Using it mainly for gaming and serving virtual servers and frankly besides a newer video card I don't need an upgrade.
I usally did the 2.5/3 year desktop upgrade cycle but I can run modern games with high graphics on a 21 monitor, and don't see a need to upgrade that.
Windows 7 is suppose to running faster then Vista, if I decide to upgrade, and I can run multiple virtual machines with memory being the problem.
There is no need for average consumer upgrade if they have purchased anything with a dual code processor, and since a new windows upgrade was a major money point for Dell in the past they must be running scared and you can expect them to make comments like this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757255</id>
	<title>I've been running it for months too</title>
	<author>thePowerOfGrayskull</author>
	<datestamp>1255621080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it an improvement over VIsta? Hell ya.  Is it an improvement over XP?  That's not so clear.  Many operations are still slower - or at least, they subjectively feel slower when I switch between my 3-year old desktop at work (XP) and my 6 month old quad-core 4GB laptop at home(Win7 64 RC) every day.  The limitations in themes are frustrating visually - if you don't want to run Aero, you're stuck with specific window decoration color scheme that you can't change (unlike windows xp).   Large file copy operations still take much, much longer than they do on XP (though on the flip side, the recovery from copy errors is much more robust). Applications launch times seem to be no better or worse than on my older XP machine -- which I take as a net loss in performance, since the XP machine's hardware is far slower than my laptop's.

<p>Some of the amenities are nice - the Explorer changes (mostly done in Vista) are very helpful, but at the same time the Explorer interface now takes up much more room than it needs to.   The only thing I actively like about 7 is the new taskbar -- but even that has its frustrations, primarily that it's not friendly for running applications that are configured based on command line options. An example is java -- while it recognizes java apps that you "pin" as JRE-based, it loses any additional information/parameters when you attempt to launch a jar file from the pinned menu.  Another is putty, which lets you specify a parameter controlling startup profile, but this is not available to pinned instances.
</p><p> All in all - it is definitely better than Vista.  Whether it's better than the XP-based configuration that Dell is talking about... I think that's very much up for debate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it an improvement over VIsta ?
Hell ya .
Is it an improvement over XP ?
That 's not so clear .
Many operations are still slower - or at least , they subjectively feel slower when I switch between my 3-year old desktop at work ( XP ) and my 6 month old quad-core 4GB laptop at home ( Win7 64 RC ) every day .
The limitations in themes are frustrating visually - if you do n't want to run Aero , you 're stuck with specific window decoration color scheme that you ca n't change ( unlike windows xp ) .
Large file copy operations still take much , much longer than they do on XP ( though on the flip side , the recovery from copy errors is much more robust ) .
Applications launch times seem to be no better or worse than on my older XP machine -- which I take as a net loss in performance , since the XP machine 's hardware is far slower than my laptop 's .
Some of the amenities are nice - the Explorer changes ( mostly done in Vista ) are very helpful , but at the same time the Explorer interface now takes up much more room than it needs to .
The only thing I actively like about 7 is the new taskbar -- but even that has its frustrations , primarily that it 's not friendly for running applications that are configured based on command line options .
An example is java -- while it recognizes java apps that you " pin " as JRE-based , it loses any additional information/parameters when you attempt to launch a jar file from the pinned menu .
Another is putty , which lets you specify a parameter controlling startup profile , but this is not available to pinned instances .
All in all - it is definitely better than Vista .
Whether it 's better than the XP-based configuration that Dell is talking about... I think that 's very much up for debate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it an improvement over VIsta?
Hell ya.
Is it an improvement over XP?
That's not so clear.
Many operations are still slower - or at least, they subjectively feel slower when I switch between my 3-year old desktop at work (XP) and my 6 month old quad-core 4GB laptop at home(Win7 64 RC) every day.
The limitations in themes are frustrating visually - if you don't want to run Aero, you're stuck with specific window decoration color scheme that you can't change (unlike windows xp).
Large file copy operations still take much, much longer than they do on XP (though on the flip side, the recovery from copy errors is much more robust).
Applications launch times seem to be no better or worse than on my older XP machine -- which I take as a net loss in performance, since the XP machine's hardware is far slower than my laptop's.
Some of the amenities are nice - the Explorer changes (mostly done in Vista) are very helpful, but at the same time the Explorer interface now takes up much more room than it needs to.
The only thing I actively like about 7 is the new taskbar -- but even that has its frustrations, primarily that it's not friendly for running applications that are configured based on command line options.
An example is java -- while it recognizes java apps that you "pin" as JRE-based, it loses any additional information/parameters when you attempt to launch a jar file from the pinned menu.
Another is putty, which lets you specify a parameter controlling startup profile, but this is not available to pinned instances.
All in all - it is definitely better than Vista.
Whether it's better than the XP-based configuration that Dell is talking about... I think that's very much up for debate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755943</id>
	<title>Oh yea, Michael</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255615500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>and if you get the latest processor technology and Office 2010 with it, you will love your PC again. It's a dramatic improvement</i></p><p>The idiocy of the "Office 2010" remark aside, that's one scared man.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and if you get the latest processor technology and Office 2010 with it , you will love your PC again .
It 's a dramatic improvementThe idiocy of the " Office 2010 " remark aside , that 's one scared man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and if you get the latest processor technology and Office 2010 with it, you will love your PC again.
It's a dramatic improvementThe idiocy of the "Office 2010" remark aside, that's one scared man.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29764555</id>
	<title>Re:Tricky talk, in my opinion.</title>
	<author>El\_Oscuro</author>
	<datestamp>1255613100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have upgraded my Ubuntu Dell 4 times without any issues, and have never had to clean out the registry.  In fact, I am not even sure where the registry is...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have upgraded my Ubuntu Dell 4 times without any issues , and have never had to clean out the registry .
In fact , I am not even sure where the registry is.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have upgraded my Ubuntu Dell 4 times without any issues, and have never had to clean out the registry.
In fact, I am not even sure where the registry is...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29761463</id>
	<title>Re:Balance Sheet</title>
	<author>cyberthanasis12</author>
	<datestamp>1255640040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Mac is like a high maintenance mistress, Windows is like a pricey Girlfriend, Ubuntu is like a wife.</p></div><p>Funny that you said that. You are married to windows and mac os. You have a contract with them. You have paid for them. You have obligations and commitments (EULA). And you will pay again when Windows 8 comes.<br>
On the other hand I am using SuSE linux now. Tomorrow I will use Ubuntu (it installs in half an hour full with applications). And tomorrow night I will have Mandriva or Fedora or Debian with me. No commitments. Just play. Hardy a marriage.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mac is like a high maintenance mistress , Windows is like a pricey Girlfriend , Ubuntu is like a wife.Funny that you said that .
You are married to windows and mac os .
You have a contract with them .
You have paid for them .
You have obligations and commitments ( EULA ) .
And you will pay again when Windows 8 comes .
On the other hand I am using SuSE linux now .
Tomorrow I will use Ubuntu ( it installs in half an hour full with applications ) .
And tomorrow night I will have Mandriva or Fedora or Debian with me .
No commitments .
Just play .
Hardy a marriage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mac is like a high maintenance mistress, Windows is like a pricey Girlfriend, Ubuntu is like a wife.Funny that you said that.
You are married to windows and mac os.
You have a contract with them.
You have paid for them.
You have obligations and commitments (EULA).
And you will pay again when Windows 8 comes.
On the other hand I am using SuSE linux now.
Tomorrow I will use Ubuntu (it installs in half an hour full with applications).
And tomorrow night I will have Mandriva or Fedora or Debian with me.
No commitments.
Just play.
Hardy a marriage.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757265</id>
	<title>I love Microsoft &amp; Win7 in a very qualified se</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255621140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually just today I got a free copy of Windows 7 ultimate from Microsoft's marketing launch events, for which generosity I'm very grateful.  It is a little out of character for me to be saying these things since I've been (and remain) a die hard UNIX &amp; free software fan for decades.  I've been running Win7 since the Beta was out several months back either in a VM or on a test PC, and generally I'm pleased at its overall stability, usefulness, and benefits.  Functionally I've ALWAYS considered Windows as sort of a dumbed down toy compared to UNIX being a developer and not being able to 'live' without routine use of bash, emacs, diff, grep, od, ssh, g++/gcc, growisofs, sed, awk, find, sort, less, tracker, tcpdump, iptables,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and hundreds of other things for which there is often no easy / built in equivalent on Windows.  On the other hand like it or not there are lots of tools / programs from Visual Studio to video games, photoshop to office 2007 that don't run well or at all under UNIX, so pragmatically I need the ability to maintain a Windows environment too.</p><p>The thing that has me changing from being hopelessly disgruntled about the incompatibilities, non-portabilities, lack of lots of  powerful UNIXish tools / utilities on Windows, et. al. is that the new generations of OS capabilities, applications, PCs, et. al. are starting to directly or indirectly evolve to ameliorate what's lacking in one environment versus the other.  More quality programs like Firefox, Thunderbird, OpenOffice are cross platform.  Many useful utilities are web applications or are increasingly becoming portable via the use of things like QT, CLR/.NET/Mono, JAVA.  Though it isn't bash, I think MS has a good thing with PowerShell 2.0, and it is powerful and compelling for its own virtues; FINALLY it is part of the OS!</p><p>Dell was right, modern mid-range PC hardware does give new reasons to love one's PC for someone like me (who is harder to please than the average user).  Now a commodity PC with 4GB or more or RAM and a dual core CPU is mainstream, and most support 64 bit computing and virtualization.  It is nothing difficult to just run a responsive and almost fully transparently functional copy of LINUX in a VM underneath Windows Vista/Windows 7.  Conversely it is no problem to run a copy of Windows in a VM under LINUX, though given difficulties with GPU virtualization, et. al. that's not a good gaming solution, but works well for most other desktop application uses.  Though they may be INCOMPATIBLE, at least they can start to COEXIST NICELY, which is wonderfully better than the days of dual booting or having multiple PCs just for that purpose.</p><p>I'm impressed by what's going on with CLR/.NET in 3.5, 4.0, and the better added support of Python, Ruby, F#, C#, et. al. under the CLR, as well as the fact that there's at least some useful amount of cross platform portability of such programs to UNIX via MONO, albeit 1-2 years behind the cutting edge functionality on the Windows platform in some cases.</p><p>Adding multiple CPU support, multi-core support, well supported 64 bit support to Windows in Vista/7 lets people run Windows effectively on fairly powerful systems and not be so limited by OS limits that were plaguing XP 32, Win2k, et. al. in times when LINUX 64 was readily available and vastly more powerful for high end workstation / server support.</p><p>Somewhat cross platform GPGPU / HPC solutions like CUDA, OpenCL, BLAS / LAPACK et. al. give promising capabilities for improving computing, DSP, media processing, et. al. dramatically in the era of Win7 but also benefit LINUX.  Windows centric solutions like DirectCompute / DX11 offer similar though less portable benefits.  In any case things like multi core CPUs, multi-GBy of cheap RAM, virtualization, big screens, better multi-monitor support, powerful and inexpensive GPUs, 64 bit OSs do give lots of reasons why Dell is right and that a new era of software / platform evolution is upon us and will provide lots of new "killer applications" and user benefits</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually just today I got a free copy of Windows 7 ultimate from Microsoft 's marketing launch events , for which generosity I 'm very grateful .
It is a little out of character for me to be saying these things since I 've been ( and remain ) a die hard UNIX &amp; free software fan for decades .
I 've been running Win7 since the Beta was out several months back either in a VM or on a test PC , and generally I 'm pleased at its overall stability , usefulness , and benefits .
Functionally I 've ALWAYS considered Windows as sort of a dumbed down toy compared to UNIX being a developer and not being able to 'live ' without routine use of bash , emacs , diff , grep , od , ssh , g + + /gcc , growisofs , sed , awk , find , sort , less , tracker , tcpdump , iptables , ... and hundreds of other things for which there is often no easy / built in equivalent on Windows .
On the other hand like it or not there are lots of tools / programs from Visual Studio to video games , photoshop to office 2007 that do n't run well or at all under UNIX , so pragmatically I need the ability to maintain a Windows environment too.The thing that has me changing from being hopelessly disgruntled about the incompatibilities , non-portabilities , lack of lots of powerful UNIXish tools / utilities on Windows , et .
al. is that the new generations of OS capabilities , applications , PCs , et .
al. are starting to directly or indirectly evolve to ameliorate what 's lacking in one environment versus the other .
More quality programs like Firefox , Thunderbird , OpenOffice are cross platform .
Many useful utilities are web applications or are increasingly becoming portable via the use of things like QT , CLR/.NET/Mono , JAVA .
Though it is n't bash , I think MS has a good thing with PowerShell 2.0 , and it is powerful and compelling for its own virtues ; FINALLY it is part of the OS ! Dell was right , modern mid-range PC hardware does give new reasons to love one 's PC for someone like me ( who is harder to please than the average user ) .
Now a commodity PC with 4GB or more or RAM and a dual core CPU is mainstream , and most support 64 bit computing and virtualization .
It is nothing difficult to just run a responsive and almost fully transparently functional copy of LINUX in a VM underneath Windows Vista/Windows 7 .
Conversely it is no problem to run a copy of Windows in a VM under LINUX , though given difficulties with GPU virtualization , et .
al. that 's not a good gaming solution , but works well for most other desktop application uses .
Though they may be INCOMPATIBLE , at least they can start to COEXIST NICELY , which is wonderfully better than the days of dual booting or having multiple PCs just for that purpose.I 'm impressed by what 's going on with CLR/.NET in 3.5 , 4.0 , and the better added support of Python , Ruby , F # , C # , et .
al. under the CLR , as well as the fact that there 's at least some useful amount of cross platform portability of such programs to UNIX via MONO , albeit 1-2 years behind the cutting edge functionality on the Windows platform in some cases.Adding multiple CPU support , multi-core support , well supported 64 bit support to Windows in Vista/7 lets people run Windows effectively on fairly powerful systems and not be so limited by OS limits that were plaguing XP 32 , Win2k , et .
al. in times when LINUX 64 was readily available and vastly more powerful for high end workstation / server support.Somewhat cross platform GPGPU / HPC solutions like CUDA , OpenCL , BLAS / LAPACK et .
al. give promising capabilities for improving computing , DSP , media processing , et .
al. dramatically in the era of Win7 but also benefit LINUX .
Windows centric solutions like DirectCompute / DX11 offer similar though less portable benefits .
In any case things like multi core CPUs , multi-GBy of cheap RAM , virtualization , big screens , better multi-monitor support , powerful and inexpensive GPUs , 64 bit OSs do give lots of reasons why Dell is right and that a new era of software / platform evolution is upon us and will provide lots of new " killer applications " and user benefits</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually just today I got a free copy of Windows 7 ultimate from Microsoft's marketing launch events, for which generosity I'm very grateful.
It is a little out of character for me to be saying these things since I've been (and remain) a die hard UNIX &amp; free software fan for decades.
I've been running Win7 since the Beta was out several months back either in a VM or on a test PC, and generally I'm pleased at its overall stability, usefulness, and benefits.
Functionally I've ALWAYS considered Windows as sort of a dumbed down toy compared to UNIX being a developer and not being able to 'live' without routine use of bash, emacs, diff, grep, od, ssh, g++/gcc, growisofs, sed, awk, find, sort, less, tracker, tcpdump, iptables, ... and hundreds of other things for which there is often no easy / built in equivalent on Windows.
On the other hand like it or not there are lots of tools / programs from Visual Studio to video games, photoshop to office 2007 that don't run well or at all under UNIX, so pragmatically I need the ability to maintain a Windows environment too.The thing that has me changing from being hopelessly disgruntled about the incompatibilities, non-portabilities, lack of lots of  powerful UNIXish tools / utilities on Windows, et.
al. is that the new generations of OS capabilities, applications, PCs, et.
al. are starting to directly or indirectly evolve to ameliorate what's lacking in one environment versus the other.
More quality programs like Firefox, Thunderbird, OpenOffice are cross platform.
Many useful utilities are web applications or are increasingly becoming portable via the use of things like QT, CLR/.NET/Mono, JAVA.
Though it isn't bash, I think MS has a good thing with PowerShell 2.0, and it is powerful and compelling for its own virtues; FINALLY it is part of the OS!Dell was right, modern mid-range PC hardware does give new reasons to love one's PC for someone like me (who is harder to please than the average user).
Now a commodity PC with 4GB or more or RAM and a dual core CPU is mainstream, and most support 64 bit computing and virtualization.
It is nothing difficult to just run a responsive and almost fully transparently functional copy of LINUX in a VM underneath Windows Vista/Windows 7.
Conversely it is no problem to run a copy of Windows in a VM under LINUX, though given difficulties with GPU virtualization, et.
al. that's not a good gaming solution, but works well for most other desktop application uses.
Though they may be INCOMPATIBLE, at least they can start to COEXIST NICELY, which is wonderfully better than the days of dual booting or having multiple PCs just for that purpose.I'm impressed by what's going on with CLR/.NET in 3.5, 4.0, and the better added support of Python, Ruby, F#, C#, et.
al. under the CLR, as well as the fact that there's at least some useful amount of cross platform portability of such programs to UNIX via MONO, albeit 1-2 years behind the cutting edge functionality on the Windows platform in some cases.Adding multiple CPU support, multi-core support, well supported 64 bit support to Windows in Vista/7 lets people run Windows effectively on fairly powerful systems and not be so limited by OS limits that were plaguing XP 32, Win2k, et.
al. in times when LINUX 64 was readily available and vastly more powerful for high end workstation / server support.Somewhat cross platform GPGPU / HPC solutions like CUDA, OpenCL, BLAS / LAPACK et.
al. give promising capabilities for improving computing, DSP, media processing, et.
al. dramatically in the era of Win7 but also benefit LINUX.
Windows centric solutions like DirectCompute / DX11 offer similar though less portable benefits.
In any case things like multi core CPUs, multi-GBy of cheap RAM, virtualization, big screens, better multi-monitor support, powerful and inexpensive GPUs, 64 bit OSs do give lots of reasons why Dell is right and that a new era of software / platform evolution is upon us and will provide lots of new "killer applications" and user benefits</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756177</id>
	<title>Windows 7</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255616640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Same pig, new dress.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Same pig , new dress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same pig, new dress.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755379</id>
	<title>Hmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255611540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't put my finger on it, but loving my PC seems narcissistic somehow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't put my finger on it , but loving my PC seems narcissistic somehow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't put my finger on it, but loving my PC seems narcissistic somehow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29775899</id>
	<title>Re:I've been running it for months too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255719480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...if you don't want to run Aero, you're stuck with specific window decoration color scheme that you can't change (unlike windows xp).</p></div><p>Are you sure you can't do that in Windows Seven?  In Vista you can disable Aero and still change the window (and other GUI widget) colors (and sometimes sizes).  I'd be surprised if they removed that in "Vista-point-one".  There's no mention of it being removed in the wikipedia article on features removed in Seven, and I couldn't find anything about that on MSDN.<br>
<br>
- T</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...if you do n't want to run Aero , you 're stuck with specific window decoration color scheme that you ca n't change ( unlike windows xp ) .Are you sure you ca n't do that in Windows Seven ?
In Vista you can disable Aero and still change the window ( and other GUI widget ) colors ( and sometimes sizes ) .
I 'd be surprised if they removed that in " Vista-point-one " .
There 's no mention of it being removed in the wikipedia article on features removed in Seven , and I could n't find anything about that on MSDN .
- T</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...if you don't want to run Aero, you're stuck with specific window decoration color scheme that you can't change (unlike windows xp).Are you sure you can't do that in Windows Seven?
In Vista you can disable Aero and still change the window (and other GUI widget) colors (and sometimes sizes).
I'd be surprised if they removed that in "Vista-point-one".
There's no mention of it being removed in the wikipedia article on features removed in Seven, and I couldn't find anything about that on MSDN.
- T
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759609</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255631340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does Windows 7 offer multiple desktops?  I run 4 or 6 on all my Linux machines and sometimes still get cramped for space.  The main irritation I get when using other people's Windows boxes is that you have to cram everything into one desktop.  And no, I don't want to pay for an add-on, it should come with the OS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does Windows 7 offer multiple desktops ?
I run 4 or 6 on all my Linux machines and sometimes still get cramped for space .
The main irritation I get when using other people 's Windows boxes is that you have to cram everything into one desktop .
And no , I do n't want to pay for an add-on , it should come with the OS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does Windows 7 offer multiple desktops?
I run 4 or 6 on all my Linux machines and sometimes still get cramped for space.
The main irritation I get when using other people's Windows boxes is that you have to cram everything into one desktop.
And no, I don't want to pay for an add-on, it should come with the OS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756023</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756911</id>
	<title>Re:Well...I agree with him.</title>
	<author>VGPowerlord</author>
	<datestamp>1255619880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait, did you just say you... use Internet Explorer?</p><p>Hey, anyone know the number of the local sanitarium?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait , did you just say you... use Internet Explorer ? Hey , anyone know the number of the local sanitarium ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait, did you just say you... use Internet Explorer?Hey, anyone know the number of the local sanitarium?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755593</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758453</id>
	<title>Re:Not going to happen</title>
	<author>VTBlue</author>
	<datestamp>1255626180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is rudimentary analysis of where actual IT costs exist and what the role of IT is.</p><p>If you believe the role of IT is to provide a service to the end-users of the organizations and to enable cost-effective business productivity, then it absolutely makes sense to consider OS upgrades that have the features of Windows 7.</p><p>Features like DirectAccess can eliminate the maintenance and software costs associated with VPN .  Bitlocker encryption eliminates the need to purchase 3rd party encryption software for compliance and security.  BranchCache in tandem with Windows Server 2008 can significantly reduce broadband expenditures while improving overall levels of service.  It can also eliminate the need to purchase costly WAN acceleration appliances which are very costly.</p><p>There are also less tangible benefits namely the fact that most schools and university will have student on either Vista or Windows 7.  This is not  opinion, it is fact.  Is it realistic for businesses to ignore that new generation of workers will be left to use software that was created when they were only 12?</p><p>If you are a mid to large business with a sophisticated employee base and cannot find value in Windows 7 than I really question your competency as a modern IT manager.  Now if you're in a position where you are constantly firefighting and battle system uptime, then you probably won't be employed for many more years.  Jobs like that will be eliminated by advances in datacenter/cloud computing/outsourcing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is rudimentary analysis of where actual IT costs exist and what the role of IT is.If you believe the role of IT is to provide a service to the end-users of the organizations and to enable cost-effective business productivity , then it absolutely makes sense to consider OS upgrades that have the features of Windows 7.Features like DirectAccess can eliminate the maintenance and software costs associated with VPN .
Bitlocker encryption eliminates the need to purchase 3rd party encryption software for compliance and security .
BranchCache in tandem with Windows Server 2008 can significantly reduce broadband expenditures while improving overall levels of service .
It can also eliminate the need to purchase costly WAN acceleration appliances which are very costly.There are also less tangible benefits namely the fact that most schools and university will have student on either Vista or Windows 7 .
This is not opinion , it is fact .
Is it realistic for businesses to ignore that new generation of workers will be left to use software that was created when they were only 12 ? If you are a mid to large business with a sophisticated employee base and can not find value in Windows 7 than I really question your competency as a modern IT manager .
Now if you 're in a position where you are constantly firefighting and battle system uptime , then you probably wo n't be employed for many more years .
Jobs like that will be eliminated by advances in datacenter/cloud computing/outsourcing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is rudimentary analysis of where actual IT costs exist and what the role of IT is.If you believe the role of IT is to provide a service to the end-users of the organizations and to enable cost-effective business productivity, then it absolutely makes sense to consider OS upgrades that have the features of Windows 7.Features like DirectAccess can eliminate the maintenance and software costs associated with VPN .
Bitlocker encryption eliminates the need to purchase 3rd party encryption software for compliance and security.
BranchCache in tandem with Windows Server 2008 can significantly reduce broadband expenditures while improving overall levels of service.
It can also eliminate the need to purchase costly WAN acceleration appliances which are very costly.There are also less tangible benefits namely the fact that most schools and university will have student on either Vista or Windows 7.
This is not  opinion, it is fact.
Is it realistic for businesses to ignore that new generation of workers will be left to use software that was created when they were only 12?If you are a mid to large business with a sophisticated employee base and cannot find value in Windows 7 than I really question your competency as a modern IT manager.
Now if you're in a position where you are constantly firefighting and battle system uptime, then you probably won't be employed for many more years.
Jobs like that will be eliminated by advances in datacenter/cloud computing/outsourcing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758135</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>drsmithy</author>
	<datestamp>1255624800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>For a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. geek, what does Windows 7 have that's *really* useful/desired/cool vs. Windows XP? Not trolling, just haven't had the time to install it/play with it yet.</i>
</p><p>* Makes running as a non-admin substantially easier.
<br>* Search.
<br>* You can install the OS into a VHD disk image and boot from it, making all those reinstalls Slashdotters seem to love less disruptive.
<br>* No need for crappy third-party Wifi management utilities.
<br>* You may like the new Taskbar.  Personally I think it's copied the OS X Dock, and therefore taking a huge step backwards in terms of usability (with the exception of being able to drag/drop and rearrange the buttons).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For a / .
geek , what does Windows 7 have that 's * really * useful/desired/cool vs. Windows XP ?
Not trolling , just have n't had the time to install it/play with it yet .
* Makes running as a non-admin substantially easier .
* Search .
* You can install the OS into a VHD disk image and boot from it , making all those reinstalls Slashdotters seem to love less disruptive .
* No need for crappy third-party Wifi management utilities .
* You may like the new Taskbar .
Personally I think it 's copied the OS X Dock , and therefore taking a huge step backwards in terms of usability ( with the exception of being able to drag/drop and rearrange the buttons ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> For a /.
geek, what does Windows 7 have that's *really* useful/desired/cool vs. Windows XP?
Not trolling, just haven't had the time to install it/play with it yet.
* Makes running as a non-admin substantially easier.
* Search.
* You can install the OS into a VHD disk image and boot from it, making all those reinstalls Slashdotters seem to love less disruptive.
* No need for crappy third-party Wifi management utilities.
* You may like the new Taskbar.
Personally I think it's copied the OS X Dock, and therefore taking a huge step backwards in terms of usability (with the exception of being able to drag/drop and rearrange the buttons).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756629</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255618680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>It's just better.</i>
<br> <br>
Judging by your comment, the MSDNAA you're talking about is the Microsoft Developer/Nanoprobe Assimilation Apparatus.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's just better .
Judging by your comment , the MSDNAA you 're talking about is the Microsoft Developer/Nanoprobe Assimilation Apparatus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's just better.
Judging by your comment, the MSDNAA you're talking about is the Microsoft Developer/Nanoprobe Assimilation Apparatus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755477</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755995</id>
	<title>Of course he'd say that</title>
	<author>jtseng</author>
	<datestamp>1255615800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Dell made plain several times that he sees the installed base of technology as very old..."</p><p>Ummmm...  There are people who still run mainframes.  I imagine alot of them are relatively old but they just work.  Why would any organization want to spend money, introduce risk and give them unneeded headaches to put in something new and shinyshiny?</p><p>Sorry, Michael.  Sometimes other people's bottom lines don't mesh with yours.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Dell made plain several times that he sees the installed base of technology as very old... " Ummmm... There are people who still run mainframes .
I imagine alot of them are relatively old but they just work .
Why would any organization want to spend money , introduce risk and give them unneeded headaches to put in something new and shinyshiny ? Sorry , Michael .
Sometimes other people 's bottom lines do n't mesh with yours .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Dell made plain several times that he sees the installed base of technology as very old..."Ummmm...  There are people who still run mainframes.
I imagine alot of them are relatively old but they just work.
Why would any organization want to spend money, introduce risk and give them unneeded headaches to put in something new and shinyshiny?Sorry, Michael.
Sometimes other people's bottom lines don't mesh with yours.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757867</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1255623660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wouldn't say that boot times or UI are faster than XP, but that is my experience.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't say that boot times or UI are faster than XP , but that is my experience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't say that boot times or UI are faster than XP, but that is my experience.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756387</id>
	<title>Re:Well...I agree with him.</title>
	<author>imakemusic</author>
	<datestamp>1255617480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm with you on this, but...<br> <br>

I installed a dual boot with 7 and Ubuntu. I prefer 7 to XP (except for some minor gripes - like why does it take so many extra clicks to get to my network settings? I used to be able to right click the system tray icon and disconnect/go to the settings...anyway...) but since using Ubuntu I don't boot into windows except for the few things I can't do in Linux (currently some games - steam runs under WINE but I like having more than 2 frames per second; and music software - yes you <i>can</i> make music on linux, you can also drive a car with your feet). Linux is just more customizable, easier to install software, etc. Yes, it takes a bit of getting used to, but no more than windows did, really. It's just that I've been using windows for so long I forgot that it took me a while to get used to it. Anyway, I'm just procrastinating.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm with you on this , but.. . I installed a dual boot with 7 and Ubuntu .
I prefer 7 to XP ( except for some minor gripes - like why does it take so many extra clicks to get to my network settings ?
I used to be able to right click the system tray icon and disconnect/go to the settings...anyway... ) but since using Ubuntu I do n't boot into windows except for the few things I ca n't do in Linux ( currently some games - steam runs under WINE but I like having more than 2 frames per second ; and music software - yes you can make music on linux , you can also drive a car with your feet ) .
Linux is just more customizable , easier to install software , etc .
Yes , it takes a bit of getting used to , but no more than windows did , really .
It 's just that I 've been using windows for so long I forgot that it took me a while to get used to it .
Anyway , I 'm just procrastinating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm with you on this, but... 

I installed a dual boot with 7 and Ubuntu.
I prefer 7 to XP (except for some minor gripes - like why does it take so many extra clicks to get to my network settings?
I used to be able to right click the system tray icon and disconnect/go to the settings...anyway...) but since using Ubuntu I don't boot into windows except for the few things I can't do in Linux (currently some games - steam runs under WINE but I like having more than 2 frames per second; and music software - yes you can make music on linux, you can also drive a car with your feet).
Linux is just more customizable, easier to install software, etc.
Yes, it takes a bit of getting used to, but no more than windows did, really.
It's just that I've been using windows for so long I forgot that it took me a while to get used to it.
Anyway, I'm just procrastinating.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755593</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756317</id>
	<title>"Windows good!" -Troll article</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255617180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Windows is good? That isn't allowed on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. RAWR!</p><p>Troll article is a troll.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Windows is good ?
That is n't allowed on / .
RAWR ! Troll article is a troll .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Windows is good?
That isn't allowed on /.
RAWR!Troll article is a troll.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755661</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Chris Mattern</author>
	<datestamp>1255613880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It's just better.</p></div></blockquote><p>Um, could you be a little more vague, sir?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's just better.Um , could you be a little more vague , sir ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's just better.Um, could you be a little more vague, sir?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755477</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759289</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1255629900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Direct X 10+</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Direct X 10 +</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Direct X 10+</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756635</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>2obvious4u</author>
	<datestamp>1255618800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've had the free release candidate for a few months now.  Here are my observations:<br>
Boots really fast.<br>
Snipping tool is awesome for tech support, you could buy a similar tool, but its 'free' with windows 7.<br>
There are other improvements but those were my favorites.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've had the free release candidate for a few months now .
Here are my observations : Boots really fast .
Snipping tool is awesome for tech support , you could buy a similar tool , but its 'free ' with windows 7 .
There are other improvements but those were my favorites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've had the free release candidate for a few months now.
Here are my observations:
Boots really fast.
Snipping tool is awesome for tech support, you could buy a similar tool, but its 'free' with windows 7.
There are other improvements but those were my favorites.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29762173</id>
	<title>Dell offered us $30,000 kit free, we binned it</title>
	<author>Stu101</author>
	<datestamp>1255600200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I work for a government body. I was new to the job and our dell rep offered us a M1000 and two dual M600 ~3Ghz blades in a mirrored sas 72 GB hot swap config. "Try it. BTW, we don't want it back!" It came with 3 Yr pro support etc.</p><p>We tried it for like a couple of days, and comparing this to a proper HP C7000 chassis at twice the price (actually, a proper HP blade centre with FC4 ports is a LOT more expensive) is much much better value. The dell stuff sits unused in the corner now, until we can write it off.</p><p>This led to us placing a $220,000 HP blade order within weeks of looking at the dell crap.</p><p>Unfortunatly, I do have a Dell E6400 laptop, but I am not responsible for desktops!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I work for a government body .
I was new to the job and our dell rep offered us a M1000 and two dual M600 ~ 3Ghz blades in a mirrored sas 72 GB hot swap config .
" Try it .
BTW , we do n't want it back !
" It came with 3 Yr pro support etc.We tried it for like a couple of days , and comparing this to a proper HP C7000 chassis at twice the price ( actually , a proper HP blade centre with FC4 ports is a LOT more expensive ) is much much better value .
The dell stuff sits unused in the corner now , until we can write it off.This led to us placing a $ 220,000 HP blade order within weeks of looking at the dell crap.Unfortunatly , I do have a Dell E6400 laptop , but I am not responsible for desktops !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I work for a government body.
I was new to the job and our dell rep offered us a M1000 and two dual M600 ~3Ghz blades in a mirrored sas 72 GB hot swap config.
"Try it.
BTW, we don't want it back!
" It came with 3 Yr pro support etc.We tried it for like a couple of days, and comparing this to a proper HP C7000 chassis at twice the price (actually, a proper HP blade centre with FC4 ports is a LOT more expensive) is much much better value.
The dell stuff sits unused in the corner now, until we can write it off.This led to us placing a $220,000 HP blade order within weeks of looking at the dell crap.Unfortunatly, I do have a Dell E6400 laptop, but I am not responsible for desktops!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755585</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm...</title>
	<author>ThorofAsgard</author>
	<datestamp>1255613400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Will it make PC users act pretentious like the stereotypical Mac user/owner?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it make PC users act pretentious like the stereotypical Mac user/owner ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it make PC users act pretentious like the stereotypical Mac user/owner?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759217</id>
	<title>Why?</title>
	<author>jvkjvk</author>
	<datestamp>1255629540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean, really, why upgrade at all if you are an average user?</p><p>If you are on Windows using XP, what is the real motivation?  Anything that came out in the last 5 years, hell probably 10 years is plenty beefy to do just about anything you do - surf the web, email, docs, spreadsheets, etc.</p><p>Computers have gotten to the point of appliances for many people.  If your dryer is still working, do you go out and get a new one?  Oh yeah, that new lint filter came out, better "upgrade"!</p><p>The only remaining reason would have to be lack of sceurity patches for older OS versions. But then again one might have to ask how secure the current crop really is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , really , why upgrade at all if you are an average user ? If you are on Windows using XP , what is the real motivation ?
Anything that came out in the last 5 years , hell probably 10 years is plenty beefy to do just about anything you do - surf the web , email , docs , spreadsheets , etc.Computers have gotten to the point of appliances for many people .
If your dryer is still working , do you go out and get a new one ?
Oh yeah , that new lint filter came out , better " upgrade " ! The only remaining reason would have to be lack of sceurity patches for older OS versions .
But then again one might have to ask how secure the current crop really is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, really, why upgrade at all if you are an average user?If you are on Windows using XP, what is the real motivation?
Anything that came out in the last 5 years, hell probably 10 years is plenty beefy to do just about anything you do - surf the web, email, docs, spreadsheets, etc.Computers have gotten to the point of appliances for many people.
If your dryer is still working, do you go out and get a new one?
Oh yeah, that new lint filter came out, better "upgrade"!The only remaining reason would have to be lack of sceurity patches for older OS versions.
But then again one might have to ask how secure the current crop really is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29764065</id>
	<title>Re:Dramatic Improvement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255609200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, you wait a bit longer here and your two Canadian cents might be worth more then American ones...</p><p>http://www.x-rates.com/d/USD/CAD/graph30.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , you wait a bit longer here and your two Canadian cents might be worth more then American ones...http : //www.x-rates.com/d/USD/CAD/graph30.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, you wait a bit longer here and your two Canadian cents might be worth more then American ones...http://www.x-rates.com/d/USD/CAD/graph30.html</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756023</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Totenglocke</author>
	<datestamp>1255615980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As someone who's used the beta / RC of Win 7 64-bit since it came out, it has plenty of useful things.</p><p>The easisest to see, and one of the nicest changes, is the new taskbar.  The quick launch toolbar has been merged with the taskbar (sort of like the dock in OS X).  All open tabs go under the icon for the program running and if you mouse over the icon you see a preview of every open window (and in the case of IE, each open tab as well) which you can then click to select or close.  It makes things cleaner and it makes it faster when searching for an open window.  Also the "show desktop" is now a part of the taskbar (on the far right edge) so it's nice and clean.</p><p>Windows Update does an amazing job of finding the right drivers for your system and with one click you can download them all and after one reboot, you're good to go.  Much nicer than downloading individual drivers and installing them when you do a clean install, especially for hard to find drivers like the video card on a laptop.</p><p>Probably the best part is that it's a 64-bit OS where basically everything 32-bit works 100\%, so you don't have to worry about legacy software not running after switching to 64-bit for more RAM (especially important for gamers since you can buy a new video card with 2 GB of RAM on it).</p><p>It's also incredibly responsive - much faster than XP when it comes to opening programs.</p><p>Another feature that will become much more important as time goes on is that it does a great job of load balancing with multi-core processors, especially when it comes to quad-core processors.</p><p>I use Windows (for gaming), OS X, and Linux regularly.  I promote Linux use all the time (which gets me lots of flack from my fellow IT guys at work who've never tried Linux) and am about to purchase a new Macbook Pro, but Win 7 is the first OS from Microsoft that I intend to pay money for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As someone who 's used the beta / RC of Win 7 64-bit since it came out , it has plenty of useful things.The easisest to see , and one of the nicest changes , is the new taskbar .
The quick launch toolbar has been merged with the taskbar ( sort of like the dock in OS X ) .
All open tabs go under the icon for the program running and if you mouse over the icon you see a preview of every open window ( and in the case of IE , each open tab as well ) which you can then click to select or close .
It makes things cleaner and it makes it faster when searching for an open window .
Also the " show desktop " is now a part of the taskbar ( on the far right edge ) so it 's nice and clean.Windows Update does an amazing job of finding the right drivers for your system and with one click you can download them all and after one reboot , you 're good to go .
Much nicer than downloading individual drivers and installing them when you do a clean install , especially for hard to find drivers like the video card on a laptop.Probably the best part is that it 's a 64-bit OS where basically everything 32-bit works 100 \ % , so you do n't have to worry about legacy software not running after switching to 64-bit for more RAM ( especially important for gamers since you can buy a new video card with 2 GB of RAM on it ) .It 's also incredibly responsive - much faster than XP when it comes to opening programs.Another feature that will become much more important as time goes on is that it does a great job of load balancing with multi-core processors , especially when it comes to quad-core processors.I use Windows ( for gaming ) , OS X , and Linux regularly .
I promote Linux use all the time ( which gets me lots of flack from my fellow IT guys at work who 've never tried Linux ) and am about to purchase a new Macbook Pro , but Win 7 is the first OS from Microsoft that I intend to pay money for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As someone who's used the beta / RC of Win 7 64-bit since it came out, it has plenty of useful things.The easisest to see, and one of the nicest changes, is the new taskbar.
The quick launch toolbar has been merged with the taskbar (sort of like the dock in OS X).
All open tabs go under the icon for the program running and if you mouse over the icon you see a preview of every open window (and in the case of IE, each open tab as well) which you can then click to select or close.
It makes things cleaner and it makes it faster when searching for an open window.
Also the "show desktop" is now a part of the taskbar (on the far right edge) so it's nice and clean.Windows Update does an amazing job of finding the right drivers for your system and with one click you can download them all and after one reboot, you're good to go.
Much nicer than downloading individual drivers and installing them when you do a clean install, especially for hard to find drivers like the video card on a laptop.Probably the best part is that it's a 64-bit OS where basically everything 32-bit works 100\%, so you don't have to worry about legacy software not running after switching to 64-bit for more RAM (especially important for gamers since you can buy a new video card with 2 GB of RAM on it).It's also incredibly responsive - much faster than XP when it comes to opening programs.Another feature that will become much more important as time goes on is that it does a great job of load balancing with multi-core processors, especially when it comes to quad-core processors.I use Windows (for gaming), OS X, and Linux regularly.
I promote Linux use all the time (which gets me lots of flack from my fellow IT guys at work who've never tried Linux) and am about to purchase a new Macbook Pro, but Win 7 is the first OS from Microsoft that I intend to pay money for.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757163</id>
	<title>poised to take advantage of the upgrade cycle</title>
	<author>viralMeme</author>
	<datestamp>1255620840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>'poised to take advantage of the upgrade cycle'<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. or time to get back on the upgrade wagon again. You need a computer with twice the power and costs twice as much to do the same as what you did last year.</htmltext>
<tokenext>'poised to take advantage of the upgrade cycle ' .. or time to get back on the upgrade wagon again .
You need a computer with twice the power and costs twice as much to do the same as what you did last year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'poised to take advantage of the upgrade cycle' .. or time to get back on the upgrade wagon again.
You need a computer with twice the power and costs twice as much to do the same as what you did last year.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755867</id>
	<title>Still lovin' my Win2k</title>
	<author>misfit815</author>
	<datestamp>1255615140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tell me again why I need to upgrade? Oh yeah, I'm missing a bunch of DRM. And I can't run the latest IE. Hmm... that's a shame...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tell me again why I need to upgrade ?
Oh yeah , I 'm missing a bunch of DRM .
And I ca n't run the latest IE .
Hmm... that 's a shame.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tell me again why I need to upgrade?
Oh yeah, I'm missing a bunch of DRM.
And I can't run the latest IE.
Hmm... that's a shame...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757423</id>
	<title>Re:Well...I agree with him.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255621740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, maybe you aren't affiliated or a shill. Maybe. But "It actually made me want to use Microsoft's included products for everything" seems a little over the top. And then, the why-bring-it-up-in-the-first-place statement "It definitely has more appeal to me than OS X now". We were talking about WinXP and Win7. Where did the OS X reference come from? In cruising for places to astroturf did you screw up and paste that into the wrong forum thread?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , maybe you are n't affiliated or a shill .
Maybe. But " It actually made me want to use Microsoft 's included products for everything " seems a little over the top .
And then , the why-bring-it-up-in-the-first-place statement " It definitely has more appeal to me than OS X now " .
We were talking about WinXP and Win7 .
Where did the OS X reference come from ?
In cruising for places to astroturf did you screw up and paste that into the wrong forum thread ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, maybe you aren't affiliated or a shill.
Maybe. But "It actually made me want to use Microsoft's included products for everything" seems a little over the top.
And then, the why-bring-it-up-in-the-first-place statement "It definitely has more appeal to me than OS X now".
We were talking about WinXP and Win7.
Where did the OS X reference come from?
In cruising for places to astroturf did you screw up and paste that into the wrong forum thread?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755593</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755705</id>
	<title>Re:Current generation is 'good enough'</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1255614180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>On the plus side, though, Nehalem and DDR3 now occupy the "soak the early adopter/serious needs crowd" niche, which has just made the older stuff even cheaper.<br> <br>

I don't much care about what MS or Dell think the new shiny is; but I'm hard pressed to see it as anything but a good thing that, when I dump the pile o' ads out of my morning paper, I see quad-core machines with 4gigs of RAM going for under $500. Heck, the $25 graphics card I bought, just because the old one died and I needed some sort of graphics capability, has more RAM than my first 6 computers did(either singly or combined) and is more powerful than the OMG-Gamer card I paid big money for back in high school.<br> <br>

Obviously, Mike here is just saying whatever he thinks will serve his company's bottom line best; but that doesn't change the fact that modern hardware is shockingly fast and crazy cheap.</htmltext>
<tokenext>On the plus side , though , Nehalem and DDR3 now occupy the " soak the early adopter/serious needs crowd " niche , which has just made the older stuff even cheaper .
I do n't much care about what MS or Dell think the new shiny is ; but I 'm hard pressed to see it as anything but a good thing that , when I dump the pile o ' ads out of my morning paper , I see quad-core machines with 4gigs of RAM going for under $ 500 .
Heck , the $ 25 graphics card I bought , just because the old one died and I needed some sort of graphics capability , has more RAM than my first 6 computers did ( either singly or combined ) and is more powerful than the OMG-Gamer card I paid big money for back in high school .
Obviously , Mike here is just saying whatever he thinks will serve his company 's bottom line best ; but that does n't change the fact that modern hardware is shockingly fast and crazy cheap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the plus side, though, Nehalem and DDR3 now occupy the "soak the early adopter/serious needs crowd" niche, which has just made the older stuff even cheaper.
I don't much care about what MS or Dell think the new shiny is; but I'm hard pressed to see it as anything but a good thing that, when I dump the pile o' ads out of my morning paper, I see quad-core machines with 4gigs of RAM going for under $500.
Heck, the $25 graphics card I bought, just because the old one died and I needed some sort of graphics capability, has more RAM than my first 6 computers did(either singly or combined) and is more powerful than the OMG-Gamer card I paid big money for back in high school.
Obviously, Mike here is just saying whatever he thinks will serve his company's bottom line best; but that doesn't change the fact that modern hardware is shockingly fast and crazy cheap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755577</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756561</id>
	<title>Re:Well...I agree with him.</title>
	<author>MickyTheIdiot</author>
	<datestamp>1255618320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know this is a little off topic Crassic, but did you like that new car I sent you?</p><p>-billg</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know this is a little off topic Crassic , but did you like that new car I sent you ? -billg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know this is a little off topic Crassic, but did you like that new car I sent you?-billg</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755593</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756917</id>
	<title>Re:Current generation is 'good enough'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255619880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...And 640K is enough for anyone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...And 640K is enough for anyone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...And 640K is enough for anyone?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755577</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755513</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>lorenlal</author>
	<datestamp>1255612680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Honestly, for home?  The power management is more customizable, the mac taskbar is nice, and it looks pretty.  You also get Media Center functionality on Home Premium or Ultimate.  Windows Installer is a little better too, it'll try and close out programs on install to minimize reboots.</p><p>When joined to a domain, I find it to be much better at handling folder redirection and offline files.  Less strange happenings, and I have yet to run into a situation where 7 just refuses to take itself out of "offline mode" the way XP did... constantly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Honestly , for home ?
The power management is more customizable , the mac taskbar is nice , and it looks pretty .
You also get Media Center functionality on Home Premium or Ultimate .
Windows Installer is a little better too , it 'll try and close out programs on install to minimize reboots.When joined to a domain , I find it to be much better at handling folder redirection and offline files .
Less strange happenings , and I have yet to run into a situation where 7 just refuses to take itself out of " offline mode " the way XP did... constantly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Honestly, for home?
The power management is more customizable, the mac taskbar is nice, and it looks pretty.
You also get Media Center functionality on Home Premium or Ultimate.
Windows Installer is a little better too, it'll try and close out programs on install to minimize reboots.When joined to a domain, I find it to be much better at handling folder redirection and offline files.
Less strange happenings, and I have yet to run into a situation where 7 just refuses to take itself out of "offline mode" the way XP did... constantly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756047</id>
	<title>Re:Tricky talk, in my opinion.</title>
	<author>intheshelter</author>
	<datestamp>1255616040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You attempt to sidestep reality aside, SP2 is 5 years old and XP IS 8 years old.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You attempt to sidestep reality aside , SP2 is 5 years old and XP IS 8 years old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You attempt to sidestep reality aside, SP2 is 5 years old and XP IS 8 years old.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758913</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255628220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like "improvements" lists, because you can read them in reverse direction.</p><p>That is "you have been using Windows XP for years and have been subjected to:"</p><ul><li>Bad use of multicore CPUs</li><li>Slow, unaccelerated GUI</li><li>Unrecoverable system file corruption</li><li>Unpredicted HD crash, because the OS is unaware of SMART HD readings and unable to prompt user</li><li>Lack of DLL seperation</li><li>Crappy RDP</li><li>Crappy central managment and deployment features for businesses</li><li>Terrible 64 bit usage with drivers</li><li>Slooooow installs</li><li>Bad power managment and usage of hardware suspend</li><li>bad usage of memory (lack of cacheing implying very noticible speed losses)</li><li>lack of Media center!</li><li>lack of transparent hard drive encryption (in pro and ultimate) with TPM</li><li>lack of program execution isolation that redirects reg and file system calls to safe locations</li><li>epiclly bad wireless support</li><li>lack of support for propper GUI scaleing on high DPI LCDs</li><li>lack Integrated Touch support and Speech Recognition(even as a prototype)</li><li>...</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like " improvements " lists , because you can read them in reverse direction.That is " you have been using Windows XP for years and have been subjected to : " Bad use of multicore CPUsSlow , unaccelerated GUIUnrecoverable system file corruptionUnpredicted HD crash , because the OS is unaware of SMART HD readings and unable to prompt userLack of DLL seperationCrappy RDPCrappy central managment and deployment features for businessesTerrible 64 bit usage with driversSlooooow installsBad power managment and usage of hardware suspendbad usage of memory ( lack of cacheing implying very noticible speed losses ) lack of Media center ! lack of transparent hard drive encryption ( in pro and ultimate ) with TPMlack of program execution isolation that redirects reg and file system calls to safe locationsepiclly bad wireless supportlack of support for propper GUI scaleing on high DPI LCDslack Integrated Touch support and Speech Recognition ( even as a prototype ) .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like "improvements" lists, because you can read them in reverse direction.That is "you have been using Windows XP for years and have been subjected to:"Bad use of multicore CPUsSlow, unaccelerated GUIUnrecoverable system file corruptionUnpredicted HD crash, because the OS is unaware of SMART HD readings and unable to prompt userLack of DLL seperationCrappy RDPCrappy central managment and deployment features for businessesTerrible 64 bit usage with driversSlooooow installsBad power managment and usage of hardware suspendbad usage of memory (lack of cacheing implying very noticible speed losses)lack of Media center!lack of transparent hard drive encryption (in pro and ultimate) with TPMlack of program execution isolation that redirects reg and file system calls to safe locationsepiclly bad wireless supportlack of support for propper GUI scaleing on high DPI LCDslack Integrated Touch support and Speech Recognition(even as a prototype)...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757737</id>
	<title>Upgrade, Upgrade, always Upgrade</title>
	<author>ears\_d</author>
	<datestamp>1255623240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>" and if you get the latest processor technology and Office 2010 with it,  "

Haven't we seen this movie enough?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" and if you get the latest processor technology and Office 2010 with it , " Have n't we seen this movie enough ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>" and if you get the latest processor technology and Office 2010 with it,  "

Haven't we seen this movie enough?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756359</id>
	<title>All I can hear is...</title>
	<author>Chas</author>
	<datestamp>1255617360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*SCHLORP*SCHLORP*SCHLORP*  "Is that how you wanted it sucked Mr. Ballmer?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* SCHLORP * SCHLORP * SCHLORP * " Is that how you wanted it sucked Mr .
Ballmer ? "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*SCHLORP*SCHLORP*SCHLORP*  "Is that how you wanted it sucked Mr.
Ballmer?"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29760851</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Yamata no Orochi</author>
	<datestamp>1255636800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>theres no longer the option to hit win key then s to bring up the shut down menu since that now does seach start menu for stuff starting with s.</p></div><p>Uh, hasn't it always been "U" to get the shutdown menu? Look for the underlined letter...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>theres no longer the option to hit win key then s to bring up the shut down menu since that now does seach start menu for stuff starting with s.Uh , has n't it always been " U " to get the shutdown menu ?
Look for the underlined letter.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>theres no longer the option to hit win key then s to bring up the shut down menu since that now does seach start menu for stuff starting with s.Uh, hasn't it always been "U" to get the shutdown menu?
Look for the underlined letter...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29776601</id>
	<title>Re:Balance Sheet</title>
	<author>motorhead</author>
	<datestamp>1255781460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Depends on how you want it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends on how you want it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends on how you want it...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756079</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756835</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>DaFallus</author>
	<datestamp>1255619640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>For a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. geek, what does Windows 7 have that's *really* useful/desired/cool vs. Windows XP? Not trolling, just haven't had the time to install it/play with it yet.</p></div></blockquote><p>

64-bit support that doesn't suck, a lot of graphical and stability improvements, improved networking, and improved security (even if you turn off the UAC). I never used Vista so my question would be what improvements does Windows 7 have over Vista? I don't know, but I've been running the Windows 7 RC on a laptop and desktop for a while and I prefer it over XP and plan on upgrading all my Windows machines. Then again, I'm going to be buying my copy through my university for $15 so price isn't really a big concern for me.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For a / .
geek , what does Windows 7 have that 's * really * useful/desired/cool vs. Windows XP ?
Not trolling , just have n't had the time to install it/play with it yet .
64-bit support that does n't suck , a lot of graphical and stability improvements , improved networking , and improved security ( even if you turn off the UAC ) .
I never used Vista so my question would be what improvements does Windows 7 have over Vista ?
I do n't know , but I 've been running the Windows 7 RC on a laptop and desktop for a while and I prefer it over XP and plan on upgrading all my Windows machines .
Then again , I 'm going to be buying my copy through my university for $ 15 so price is n't really a big concern for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a /.
geek, what does Windows 7 have that's *really* useful/desired/cool vs. Windows XP?
Not trolling, just haven't had the time to install it/play with it yet.
64-bit support that doesn't suck, a lot of graphical and stability improvements, improved networking, and improved security (even if you turn off the UAC).
I never used Vista so my question would be what improvements does Windows 7 have over Vista?
I don't know, but I've been running the Windows 7 RC on a laptop and desktop for a while and I prefer it over XP and plan on upgrading all my Windows machines.
Then again, I'm going to be buying my copy through my university for $15 so price isn't really a big concern for me.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755557</id>
	<title>I have loved my PC since 26 August, 1991</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255613100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NFM</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NFM</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NFM</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755963</id>
	<title>Re:Tricky talk, in my opinion.</title>
	<author>StormReaver</author>
	<datestamp>1255615680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Windows XP has had a VERY high cost of ownership....</p><p>Windows XP has had a VERY high cost of <b>rental</b>....</p><p>Fixed that for you.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Windows XP has had a VERY high cost of ownership....Windows XP has had a VERY high cost of rental....Fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Windows XP has had a VERY high cost of ownership....Windows XP has had a VERY high cost of rental....Fixed that for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757261</id>
	<title>a real wifi manager</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255621140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you have a laptop and hop around, Windows 7 actually has a good wifi manager. XP and Vista suck at wifi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have a laptop and hop around , Windows 7 actually has a good wifi manager .
XP and Vista suck at wifi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you have a laptop and hop around, Windows 7 actually has a good wifi manager.
XP and Vista suck at wifi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758957</id>
	<title>The best part</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255628400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The best part is that they're only <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System\_7" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">eighteen years behind Apple.</a> [wikipedia.org] Give 'em another ten years, and they'll re-build WIndows on a Unix foundation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The best part is that they 're only eighteen years behind Apple .
[ wikipedia.org ] Give 'em another ten years , and they 'll re-build WIndows on a Unix foundation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The best part is that they're only eighteen years behind Apple.
[wikipedia.org] Give 'em another ten years, and they'll re-build WIndows on a Unix foundation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758027</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>onefriedrice</author>
	<datestamp>1255624380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Vista was like eight years of G. W. Bush.  Then we asked for "change," and they give us the same thing, but.. different...  We think it's the best thing we've ever had.  Tears of joy stream down our faces on October 22 as they did November 4, 08 as we're caught up in the momentous occasion.  Nevermind that the best thing we've been able to come up with to explain 7's greatness is that at least it's not Vista.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Vista was like eight years of G. W. Bush .
Then we asked for " change , " and they give us the same thing , but.. different... We think it 's the best thing we 've ever had .
Tears of joy stream down our faces on October 22 as they did November 4 , 08 as we 're caught up in the momentous occasion .
Nevermind that the best thing we 've been able to come up with to explain 7 's greatness is that at least it 's not Vista .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vista was like eight years of G. W. Bush.
Then we asked for "change," and they give us the same thing, but.. different...  We think it's the best thing we've ever had.
Tears of joy stream down our faces on October 22 as they did November 4, 08 as we're caught up in the momentous occasion.
Nevermind that the best thing we've been able to come up with to explain 7's greatness is that at least it's not Vista.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755905</id>
	<title>Is 7 really that different from Vista?</title>
	<author>Interoperable</author>
	<datestamp>1255615320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use Windows Vista (at least I do when I've somehow broken X on my Linux install) and I don't see why people hate it so much. Almost all hardware comes with compatible drivers these days, I have a reasonably powerful mid-range desktop with 4GB of RAM and I'm used to logging in as root every 5 minutes so the "are you sure" messages don't really bother me. Given all that, I think Vista is a good operating system (although I did upgrade to it directly from Windows 98).</p><p>Can someone who has used Vista extensively and tried Windows 7 RC let me know if it's actually very different from Vista or is all the "it's so much better than Vista" hype just a reaction to the now accepted (but I argue ill-founded) view that Vista sucks? From what I can tell it seems that Microsoft slapped a new wallpaper on Vista and called it Windows 7 just to get away from the name Vista.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use Windows Vista ( at least I do when I 've somehow broken X on my Linux install ) and I do n't see why people hate it so much .
Almost all hardware comes with compatible drivers these days , I have a reasonably powerful mid-range desktop with 4GB of RAM and I 'm used to logging in as root every 5 minutes so the " are you sure " messages do n't really bother me .
Given all that , I think Vista is a good operating system ( although I did upgrade to it directly from Windows 98 ) .Can someone who has used Vista extensively and tried Windows 7 RC let me know if it 's actually very different from Vista or is all the " it 's so much better than Vista " hype just a reaction to the now accepted ( but I argue ill-founded ) view that Vista sucks ?
From what I can tell it seems that Microsoft slapped a new wallpaper on Vista and called it Windows 7 just to get away from the name Vista .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use Windows Vista (at least I do when I've somehow broken X on my Linux install) and I don't see why people hate it so much.
Almost all hardware comes with compatible drivers these days, I have a reasonably powerful mid-range desktop with 4GB of RAM and I'm used to logging in as root every 5 minutes so the "are you sure" messages don't really bother me.
Given all that, I think Vista is a good operating system (although I did upgrade to it directly from Windows 98).Can someone who has used Vista extensively and tried Windows 7 RC let me know if it's actually very different from Vista or is all the "it's so much better than Vista" hype just a reaction to the now accepted (but I argue ill-founded) view that Vista sucks?
From what I can tell it seems that Microsoft slapped a new wallpaper on Vista and called it Windows 7 just to get away from the name Vista.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756289</id>
	<title>Re:Tricky talk, in my opinion.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255617120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What?</p><p>Seriously, you'd upgrade 10s/100s/1000s of desktops from XP to 7 if you could rather than do a clean OS image? Are you insane? I wouldn't even contemplate it for a single machine because of the potential issues, let alone hundreds or thousands. If it takes you 40 hours to get your machines from blank to functional you really need to look at how you're doing it; 2 hours *maximum* to image a machine, get it online and install any additional software packages. 99\% of config should be done on the image or via GPOs and anything extra should be minor and straightforward. This is all assuming you don't have any software deployment solution (SMS/LANDesk/Altiris/Zenworks/etc) that would allow you to automate the additional software installs and reduce the deployment time even further.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What ? Seriously , you 'd upgrade 10s/100s/1000s of desktops from XP to 7 if you could rather than do a clean OS image ?
Are you insane ?
I would n't even contemplate it for a single machine because of the potential issues , let alone hundreds or thousands .
If it takes you 40 hours to get your machines from blank to functional you really need to look at how you 're doing it ; 2 hours * maximum * to image a machine , get it online and install any additional software packages .
99 \ % of config should be done on the image or via GPOs and anything extra should be minor and straightforward .
This is all assuming you do n't have any software deployment solution ( SMS/LANDesk/Altiris/Zenworks/etc ) that would allow you to automate the additional software installs and reduce the deployment time even further .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?Seriously, you'd upgrade 10s/100s/1000s of desktops from XP to 7 if you could rather than do a clean OS image?
Are you insane?
I wouldn't even contemplate it for a single machine because of the potential issues, let alone hundreds or thousands.
If it takes you 40 hours to get your machines from blank to functional you really need to look at how you're doing it; 2 hours *maximum* to image a machine, get it online and install any additional software packages.
99\% of config should be done on the image or via GPOs and anything extra should be minor and straightforward.
This is all assuming you don't have any software deployment solution (SMS/LANDesk/Altiris/Zenworks/etc) that would allow you to automate the additional software installs and reduce the deployment time even further.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29765297</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7</title>
	<author>CAIMLAS</author>
	<datestamp>1255620840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, it's a new, skinny pig, with the same dress. The dress does not fit too well any longer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , it 's a new , skinny pig , with the same dress .
The dress does not fit too well any longer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, it's a new, skinny pig, with the same dress.
The dress does not fit too well any longer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756197</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255616760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also:<br> <br>

Built in low-latency audio and per-application volume control.<br> <br>

They've also taken a balanced approach to the GUI. They improved the bits that didn't work and removed/hidden the bits that did. Yeah, balanced.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also : Built in low-latency audio and per-application volume control .
They 've also taken a balanced approach to the GUI .
They improved the bits that did n't work and removed/hidden the bits that did .
Yeah , balanced .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also: 

Built in low-latency audio and per-application volume control.
They've also taken a balanced approach to the GUI.
They improved the bits that didn't work and removed/hidden the bits that did.
Yeah, balanced.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29765439</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Foolhardy</author>
	<datestamp>1255622760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Much better use of multicore CPUs</p></div><p>There is a little more power mgmt stuff, but I wouldn't call it "much better".</p><p><div class="quote"><p>GPU acceleration of the GUI</p></div><p>Windows NT has always supported GPU acceleration of the GUI through the display driver. The DWM just uses it differently, mostly for 3d effects and caching window contents.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>DLL seperation</p></div><p>What does this mean? DLLs have always been mapped COW in processes, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Side-by-side\_assembly" title="wikipedia.org">SXS</a> [wikipedia.org] was introduced in XP.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>vastly better RDP</p></div><p>You can use the fancy aero and desktop composition effects in RDP6, in Vista, plus support for more device redirection. This is nice, but mainly eye candy. Not a <i>vast</i> improvement. There isn't much substantive that you can do with RDP 6.1 that you couldn't in 5.1. Or NT4 TSE for that matter.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>vastly improved central managment and deployment features for businesses</p></div><p>Group policy, with MSI installation, net boot installation, etc. existed in their current form since Windows 2000. There have been improvements, but no vast revolutions.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Easy 64 bit usage with drivers</p></div><p>XP had AMD64 support first (albeit with the WS2003 code base). The drivers are finally catching up. This is mainly the job of IHVs, not Microsoft. The drivers that Microsoft traditionally provides (most of them, really) were ready in XP64.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Faster installs</p></div><p>Yes, Vista now uses an image based install that supposed to be much faster.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Better power managment and usage of hardware suspend</p></div><p>2000 fully supported ACPI power modes. There have been minor refinements since then, but noting major.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>better usage of memory (cacheing for very noticible speed gains)</p></div><p>SuperFetch (new in Vista) does pre-emptively fill unused memory with things that were paged out or the OS otherwise thinks you may use. To support this, the kernel now has 8 memory priorities, which help a lot in determining what should go first when memory gets tight.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Media center!</p></div><p>XP had MCE first.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>transparent Bitlocker hard drive encryption (in pro and ultimate) with TPM</p></div><p>Note that per-file encryption has been supported since 2000.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>program execution isolation that redirects reg and file system calls to safe locations</p></div><p>There have been some redirection shims since XP at least.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>epiclly better wireless support</p></div><p>Epically? It certainly takes more clicks to get into the adapter list control panel. There are automatic locations in Vista that automatically config your firewall and such, but XP works fine if you just want to connect to the network.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>support for propper GUI scaleing on high DPI LCDs</p></div><p>It's better, but there's still a lot of apps that break</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Automatic driver retrival for most hardware right of Windows update without searching</p></div><p>XP will offer to search for drivers for unknown hardware, and include driver updates in Windows Update.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Faster boot times and UI responce on semi-decent hardware (compared to XP)</p></div><p>XP has prefetching and a lot less to load than Vista or "7". Why would the UI responsiveness be any better?
<br> <br>Windows 7 does have improvements, don't get me wrong I'll probably upgrade to it, but it's not making a major advance in every area. XP still does most of what 7 and Vista do, and using less resources. Besides, Vista was the major version change to 6.0.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Much better use of multicore CPUsThere is a little more power mgmt stuff , but I would n't call it " much better " .GPU acceleration of the GUIWindows NT has always supported GPU acceleration of the GUI through the display driver .
The DWM just uses it differently , mostly for 3d effects and caching window contents.DLL seperationWhat does this mean ?
DLLs have always been mapped COW in processes , and SXS [ wikipedia.org ] was introduced in XP.vastly better RDPYou can use the fancy aero and desktop composition effects in RDP6 , in Vista , plus support for more device redirection .
This is nice , but mainly eye candy .
Not a vast improvement .
There is n't much substantive that you can do with RDP 6.1 that you could n't in 5.1 .
Or NT4 TSE for that matter.vastly improved central managment and deployment features for businessesGroup policy , with MSI installation , net boot installation , etc .
existed in their current form since Windows 2000 .
There have been improvements , but no vast revolutions.Easy 64 bit usage with driversXP had AMD64 support first ( albeit with the WS2003 code base ) .
The drivers are finally catching up .
This is mainly the job of IHVs , not Microsoft .
The drivers that Microsoft traditionally provides ( most of them , really ) were ready in XP64.Faster installsYes , Vista now uses an image based install that supposed to be much faster.Better power managment and usage of hardware suspend2000 fully supported ACPI power modes .
There have been minor refinements since then , but noting major.better usage of memory ( cacheing for very noticible speed gains ) SuperFetch ( new in Vista ) does pre-emptively fill unused memory with things that were paged out or the OS otherwise thinks you may use .
To support this , the kernel now has 8 memory priorities , which help a lot in determining what should go first when memory gets tight.Media center ! XP had MCE first.transparent Bitlocker hard drive encryption ( in pro and ultimate ) with TPMNote that per-file encryption has been supported since 2000.program execution isolation that redirects reg and file system calls to safe locationsThere have been some redirection shims since XP at least.epiclly better wireless supportEpically ?
It certainly takes more clicks to get into the adapter list control panel .
There are automatic locations in Vista that automatically config your firewall and such , but XP works fine if you just want to connect to the network.support for propper GUI scaleing on high DPI LCDsIt 's better , but there 's still a lot of apps that breakAutomatic driver retrival for most hardware right of Windows update without searchingXP will offer to search for drivers for unknown hardware , and include driver updates in Windows Update.Faster boot times and UI responce on semi-decent hardware ( compared to XP ) XP has prefetching and a lot less to load than Vista or " 7 " .
Why would the UI responsiveness be any better ?
Windows 7 does have improvements , do n't get me wrong I 'll probably upgrade to it , but it 's not making a major advance in every area .
XP still does most of what 7 and Vista do , and using less resources .
Besides , Vista was the major version change to 6.0 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Much better use of multicore CPUsThere is a little more power mgmt stuff, but I wouldn't call it "much better".GPU acceleration of the GUIWindows NT has always supported GPU acceleration of the GUI through the display driver.
The DWM just uses it differently, mostly for 3d effects and caching window contents.DLL seperationWhat does this mean?
DLLs have always been mapped COW in processes, and SXS [wikipedia.org] was introduced in XP.vastly better RDPYou can use the fancy aero and desktop composition effects in RDP6, in Vista, plus support for more device redirection.
This is nice, but mainly eye candy.
Not a vast improvement.
There isn't much substantive that you can do with RDP 6.1 that you couldn't in 5.1.
Or NT4 TSE for that matter.vastly improved central managment and deployment features for businessesGroup policy, with MSI installation, net boot installation, etc.
existed in their current form since Windows 2000.
There have been improvements, but no vast revolutions.Easy 64 bit usage with driversXP had AMD64 support first (albeit with the WS2003 code base).
The drivers are finally catching up.
This is mainly the job of IHVs, not Microsoft.
The drivers that Microsoft traditionally provides (most of them, really) were ready in XP64.Faster installsYes, Vista now uses an image based install that supposed to be much faster.Better power managment and usage of hardware suspend2000 fully supported ACPI power modes.
There have been minor refinements since then, but noting major.better usage of memory (cacheing for very noticible speed gains)SuperFetch (new in Vista) does pre-emptively fill unused memory with things that were paged out or the OS otherwise thinks you may use.
To support this, the kernel now has 8 memory priorities, which help a lot in determining what should go first when memory gets tight.Media center!XP had MCE first.transparent Bitlocker hard drive encryption (in pro and ultimate) with TPMNote that per-file encryption has been supported since 2000.program execution isolation that redirects reg and file system calls to safe locationsThere have been some redirection shims since XP at least.epiclly better wireless supportEpically?
It certainly takes more clicks to get into the adapter list control panel.
There are automatic locations in Vista that automatically config your firewall and such, but XP works fine if you just want to connect to the network.support for propper GUI scaleing on high DPI LCDsIt's better, but there's still a lot of apps that breakAutomatic driver retrival for most hardware right of Windows update without searchingXP will offer to search for drivers for unknown hardware, and include driver updates in Windows Update.Faster boot times and UI responce on semi-decent hardware (compared to XP)XP has prefetching and a lot less to load than Vista or "7".
Why would the UI responsiveness be any better?
Windows 7 does have improvements, don't get me wrong I'll probably upgrade to it, but it's not making a major advance in every area.
XP still does most of what 7 and Vista do, and using less resources.
Besides, Vista was the major version change to 6.0.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755747</id>
	<title>Why change?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255614360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hello,</p><p>I have been running XP since it has been available as a beta....<br>Why change? Ihave 4GB of ram and no swap file, I never fill up that much ram... why do I need 64 bits?<br>with the latest intel core, my office 2003 run fast and snapy, and is consistent with every other window app that has ever been (menus, easy to find functions, text in the menuallowing me to lear keyboard short cut for functions)... the latest "ribons" are slow, and do not help me learn how to work more efficiently...</p><p>sure, a win7 desktop looks like a peice or art... but is that what we want of our PC? or do we want a functional tool?</p><p>using old style theme (win95) gives small window border that are a clear demarcation line from window to window, allowing to separate multiple windows with no confusions!</p><p>XP is a hammer, it works, it is efficient and fast.<br>Win 7 is a glass hammer, it is pretty, but try to put a serious nail in and you will run into troubles...</p><p>regards, cyrille</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hello,I have been running XP since it has been available as a beta....Why change ?
Ihave 4GB of ram and no swap file , I never fill up that much ram... why do I need 64 bits ? with the latest intel core , my office 2003 run fast and snapy , and is consistent with every other window app that has ever been ( menus , easy to find functions , text in the menuallowing me to lear keyboard short cut for functions ) ... the latest " ribons " are slow , and do not help me learn how to work more efficiently...sure , a win7 desktop looks like a peice or art... but is that what we want of our PC ?
or do we want a functional tool ? using old style theme ( win95 ) gives small window border that are a clear demarcation line from window to window , allowing to separate multiple windows with no confusions ! XP is a hammer , it works , it is efficient and fast.Win 7 is a glass hammer , it is pretty , but try to put a serious nail in and you will run into troubles...regards , cyrille</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hello,I have been running XP since it has been available as a beta....Why change?
Ihave 4GB of ram and no swap file, I never fill up that much ram... why do I need 64 bits?with the latest intel core, my office 2003 run fast and snapy, and is consistent with every other window app that has ever been (menus, easy to find functions, text in the menuallowing me to lear keyboard short cut for functions)... the latest "ribons" are slow, and do not help me learn how to work more efficiently...sure, a win7 desktop looks like a peice or art... but is that what we want of our PC?
or do we want a functional tool?using old style theme (win95) gives small window border that are a clear demarcation line from window to window, allowing to separate multiple windows with no confusions!XP is a hammer, it works, it is efficient and fast.Win 7 is a glass hammer, it is pretty, but try to put a serious nail in and you will run into troubles...regards, cyrille</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755567</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255613280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well as a non m$ fanboy thats been using it, it is acceptible enough for me to migrate away from xp for a 64 bit capable os. IF and I stress if, the ligit release version offers a classic start menu as an option over the retarded "new" start menu it would constitute a down right good upgrade in my book, hell I'd even take a task bar on all monitors instead of just one. But in short its better than xp64. Most of the new fluf you really dont notice, aero is pretty nice tho, and theres a few little things that are a plesent surprise such as the easy maximize functionality they added in(drag to a corner) The absolute biggest problem I have with it is they seemed to go out of their way to remove perfectly functional and useful features for no reason at all. A good example of this is if you right click a task item on the task bar you get the various options such as restore move maximise ect, that is all gone now, instead all you get it pin to task bar and close. really friging annoying to me, also alot of hotkey support is gone, theres no longer the option to hit win key then s to bring up the shut down menu since that now does seach start menu for stuff starting with s.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well as a non m $ fanboy thats been using it , it is acceptible enough for me to migrate away from xp for a 64 bit capable os .
IF and I stress if , the ligit release version offers a classic start menu as an option over the retarded " new " start menu it would constitute a down right good upgrade in my book , hell I 'd even take a task bar on all monitors instead of just one .
But in short its better than xp64 .
Most of the new fluf you really dont notice , aero is pretty nice tho , and theres a few little things that are a plesent surprise such as the easy maximize functionality they added in ( drag to a corner ) The absolute biggest problem I have with it is they seemed to go out of their way to remove perfectly functional and useful features for no reason at all .
A good example of this is if you right click a task item on the task bar you get the various options such as restore move maximise ect , that is all gone now , instead all you get it pin to task bar and close .
really friging annoying to me , also alot of hotkey support is gone , theres no longer the option to hit win key then s to bring up the shut down menu since that now does seach start menu for stuff starting with s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well as a non m$ fanboy thats been using it, it is acceptible enough for me to migrate away from xp for a 64 bit capable os.
IF and I stress if, the ligit release version offers a classic start menu as an option over the retarded "new" start menu it would constitute a down right good upgrade in my book, hell I'd even take a task bar on all monitors instead of just one.
But in short its better than xp64.
Most of the new fluf you really dont notice, aero is pretty nice tho, and theres a few little things that are a plesent surprise such as the easy maximize functionality they added in(drag to a corner) The absolute biggest problem I have with it is they seemed to go out of their way to remove perfectly functional and useful features for no reason at all.
A good example of this is if you right click a task item on the task bar you get the various options such as restore move maximise ect, that is all gone now, instead all you get it pin to task bar and close.
really friging annoying to me, also alot of hotkey support is gone, theres no longer the option to hit win key then s to bring up the shut down menu since that now does seach start menu for stuff starting with s.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755667</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Rhaban</author>
	<datestamp>1255613880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heretic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heretic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heretic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755477</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29761659</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>jim\_v2000</author>
	<datestamp>1255597680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Go play with it...it's a lot easier than having someone explain it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Go play with it...it 's a lot easier than having someone explain it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go play with it...it's a lot easier than having someone explain it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29761267</id>
	<title>WIndoze 7 just sucks == Vista SP2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255639020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WIndows 7 is just patched Windoze Vista. Time for Dell to grow up and come up a linux distro OS for their own PC. Wndoze is still a POS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WIndows 7 is just patched Windoze Vista .
Time for Dell to grow up and come up a linux distro OS for their own PC .
Wndoze is still a POS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WIndows 7 is just patched Windoze Vista.
Time for Dell to grow up and come up a linux distro OS for their own PC.
Wndoze is still a POS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758797</id>
	<title>Re:I've been running it for months too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255627680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt; though on the flip side, the recovery from copy errors is much more robust</p><p>Try TeraCopy (http://www.codesector.com/teracopy.php) on your XP machine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; though on the flip side , the recovery from copy errors is much more robustTry TeraCopy ( http : //www.codesector.com/teracopy.php ) on your XP machine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt; though on the flip side, the recovery from copy errors is much more robustTry TeraCopy (http://www.codesector.com/teracopy.php) on your XP machine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757327</id>
	<title>Re:Is 7 really that different from Vista?</title>
	<author>cjjjer</author>
	<datestamp>1255621380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, I have been using Vista on my work laptop for almost two years and I have been using Win7 on my personal dev laptop since RC1.  This might sound really lame and trivial but what has me hooked so far are the Jump Lists, "Snap", the Task Bar (Window Grouping and Preview) and the HomeGroup features.<br> <br>The UAC is way less of an annoyance under Win7 out of the box and the unknown device support is actually better in Win7.  Both laptops have the same AuthenTec fingerprint device, under Vista I have to download the drivers manually, Under Win7 Windows Update now supplies a driver (at the time of install AuthenTec had beta drivers for Win7 only and are not certified for Win7 so they would never be available on Windows Update).<br> <br>Download a trial, install it into a VM and use it for browsing the web and daily stuff, you will either like it and think it's' worth upgrading to or not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I have been using Vista on my work laptop for almost two years and I have been using Win7 on my personal dev laptop since RC1 .
This might sound really lame and trivial but what has me hooked so far are the Jump Lists , " Snap " , the Task Bar ( Window Grouping and Preview ) and the HomeGroup features .
The UAC is way less of an annoyance under Win7 out of the box and the unknown device support is actually better in Win7 .
Both laptops have the same AuthenTec fingerprint device , under Vista I have to download the drivers manually , Under Win7 Windows Update now supplies a driver ( at the time of install AuthenTec had beta drivers for Win7 only and are not certified for Win7 so they would never be available on Windows Update ) .
Download a trial , install it into a VM and use it for browsing the web and daily stuff , you will either like it and think it 's ' worth upgrading to or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I have been using Vista on my work laptop for almost two years and I have been using Win7 on my personal dev laptop since RC1.
This might sound really lame and trivial but what has me hooked so far are the Jump Lists, "Snap", the Task Bar (Window Grouping and Preview) and the HomeGroup features.
The UAC is way less of an annoyance under Win7 out of the box and the unknown device support is actually better in Win7.
Both laptops have the same AuthenTec fingerprint device, under Vista I have to download the drivers manually, Under Win7 Windows Update now supplies a driver (at the time of install AuthenTec had beta drivers for Win7 only and are not certified for Win7 so they would never be available on Windows Update).
Download a trial, install it into a VM and use it for browsing the web and daily stuff, you will either like it and think it's' worth upgrading to or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755905</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755383</id>
	<title>Balance Sheet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255611540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've been using Windows 7 for a long time now, and if you get the latest processor technology and Office 2010 with it, you will love your PC again. It's a dramatic improvement.</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16832116717" title="newegg.com">Microsoft Windows 7 Professional Full - Retail</a> [newegg.com]: $299.99<br>
<a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115202&amp;Tpk=nehalem" title="newegg.com">Cheapest Nehalem Processor</a> [newegg.com]: $279.99<br>
(note, can't buy Office 2010 yet)<br>
<a href="http://store.microsoft.com/microsoft/Office-Standard-2007/product/43340A05" title="microsoft.com">Latest Office 20xx</a> [microsoft.com]: $399.95<br> <br>

Total: $979.93<br> <br>

So Michael Dell, the CEO of the company that is the largest dealer of PCs to businesses and individuals, suggests you opt for the extra grand in order to 'love your PC again.'  You don't say.  I would be <i>shocked</i> if anyone was willing to fork over more than $900 for an entire computer these days.  How am I to differentiate this from any salesman saying, "Buy the most expensive one for the best experience."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been using Windows 7 for a long time now , and if you get the latest processor technology and Office 2010 with it , you will love your PC again .
It 's a dramatic improvement .
Microsoft Windows 7 Professional Full - Retail [ newegg.com ] : $ 299.99 Cheapest Nehalem Processor [ newegg.com ] : $ 279.99 ( note , ca n't buy Office 2010 yet ) Latest Office 20xx [ microsoft.com ] : $ 399.95 Total : $ 979.93 So Michael Dell , the CEO of the company that is the largest dealer of PCs to businesses and individuals , suggests you opt for the extra grand in order to 'love your PC again .
' You do n't say .
I would be shocked if anyone was willing to fork over more than $ 900 for an entire computer these days .
How am I to differentiate this from any salesman saying , " Buy the most expensive one for the best experience .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been using Windows 7 for a long time now, and if you get the latest processor technology and Office 2010 with it, you will love your PC again.
It's a dramatic improvement.
Microsoft Windows 7 Professional Full - Retail [newegg.com]: $299.99
Cheapest Nehalem Processor [newegg.com]: $279.99
(note, can't buy Office 2010 yet)
Latest Office 20xx [microsoft.com]: $399.95 

Total: $979.93 

So Michael Dell, the CEO of the company that is the largest dealer of PCs to businesses and individuals, suggests you opt for the extra grand in order to 'love your PC again.
'  You don't say.
I would be shocked if anyone was willing to fork over more than $900 for an entire computer these days.
How am I to differentiate this from any salesman saying, "Buy the most expensive one for the best experience.
"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755577</id>
	<title>Current generation is 'good enough'</title>
	<author>Little\_Professor</author>
	<datestamp>1255613340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>While I agree Windows 7 is a leap forward from XP, I think Intel are going to struggle to get people to see Nehalem as the same category for upgrades. The Nehalem processors (and the associated required DDR3 RAM) are significantly more expensive than the Core2Duo processors, without providing any noticeable benefit for the vast majority of users. Unless you are a gamer or into heavy video/photo editing, the current Core2Duo generation is more than sufficient to outperform your needs.

Ironically Windows 7, by running better than Vista on lower system requirements, will actually hurt Nehalem sales, by breaking the "software bloat"-"hardware upgrade" cycle</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I agree Windows 7 is a leap forward from XP , I think Intel are going to struggle to get people to see Nehalem as the same category for upgrades .
The Nehalem processors ( and the associated required DDR3 RAM ) are significantly more expensive than the Core2Duo processors , without providing any noticeable benefit for the vast majority of users .
Unless you are a gamer or into heavy video/photo editing , the current Core2Duo generation is more than sufficient to outperform your needs .
Ironically Windows 7 , by running better than Vista on lower system requirements , will actually hurt Nehalem sales , by breaking the " software bloat " - " hardware upgrade " cycle</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I agree Windows 7 is a leap forward from XP, I think Intel are going to struggle to get people to see Nehalem as the same category for upgrades.
The Nehalem processors (and the associated required DDR3 RAM) are significantly more expensive than the Core2Duo processors, without providing any noticeable benefit for the vast majority of users.
Unless you are a gamer or into heavy video/photo editing, the current Core2Duo generation is more than sufficient to outperform your needs.
Ironically Windows 7, by running better than Vista on lower system requirements, will actually hurt Nehalem sales, by breaking the "software bloat"-"hardware upgrade" cycle</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755509</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255612620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's the DRM, the 35 gigabytes of wasted space, the large price-tag you must pay to Microsoft for the pleasure of having them tell you how you can use your computer. There's the increased system requirements, the lowered system performance.... uhm.... oh and there's a "7" in the name!</p><p>Just to name a few things of course.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Oh one last thing, there's the inevitable upgrade cycle that will mean in about 3-4 years they'll -tell- you how horribly bad Windows 7 is, and how much better 8 will be. While compounding all the previous bonuses!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's the DRM , the 35 gigabytes of wasted space , the large price-tag you must pay to Microsoft for the pleasure of having them tell you how you can use your computer .
There 's the increased system requirements , the lowered system performance.... uhm.... oh and there 's a " 7 " in the name ! Just to name a few things of course .
: ) Oh one last thing , there 's the inevitable upgrade cycle that will mean in about 3-4 years they 'll -tell- you how horribly bad Windows 7 is , and how much better 8 will be .
While compounding all the previous bonuses !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's the DRM, the 35 gigabytes of wasted space, the large price-tag you must pay to Microsoft for the pleasure of having them tell you how you can use your computer.
There's the increased system requirements, the lowered system performance.... uhm.... oh and there's a "7" in the name!Just to name a few things of course.
:)Oh one last thing, there's the inevitable upgrade cycle that will mean in about 3-4 years they'll -tell- you how horribly bad Windows 7 is, and how much better 8 will be.
While compounding all the previous bonuses!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29762243</id>
	<title>Windows 7 isn't that bad (in my experience)...</title>
	<author>pnice</author>
	<datestamp>1255600500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've been running Windows 7 on my Dell Mini 10 Netbook for around 5 months now and I've been very pleased with it.  I wouldn't have tried putting Vista on the thing at all with the 1 gig of ram it has but Windows 7 doesn't give me trouble really.  I enjoy it more than Vista by far.  It just seems more agreeable (if that's possible when talking about an OS).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been running Windows 7 on my Dell Mini 10 Netbook for around 5 months now and I 've been very pleased with it .
I would n't have tried putting Vista on the thing at all with the 1 gig of ram it has but Windows 7 does n't give me trouble really .
I enjoy it more than Vista by far .
It just seems more agreeable ( if that 's possible when talking about an OS ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been running Windows 7 on my Dell Mini 10 Netbook for around 5 months now and I've been very pleased with it.
I wouldn't have tried putting Vista on the thing at all with the 1 gig of ram it has but Windows 7 doesn't give me trouble really.
I enjoy it more than Vista by far.
It just seems more agreeable (if that's possible when talking about an OS).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29761207</id>
	<title>Re:Well...I agree with him.</title>
	<author>flibuste</author>
	<datestamp>1255638600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I had the same great experience. For two days. It was so great I wanted to throw Ubuntu out.
Then it started BSOD-ing like crazy, while it close-to-never happened with the XP installation on the same machine. Granted it was Windows 7 RC1 but that really didn't look good.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had the same great experience .
For two days .
It was so great I wanted to throw Ubuntu out .
Then it started BSOD-ing like crazy , while it close-to-never happened with the XP installation on the same machine .
Granted it was Windows 7 RC1 but that really did n't look good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had the same great experience.
For two days.
It was so great I wanted to throw Ubuntu out.
Then it started BSOD-ing like crazy, while it close-to-never happened with the XP installation on the same machine.
Granted it was Windows 7 RC1 but that really didn't look good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755593</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758131</id>
	<title>Re:Current generation is 'good enough'</title>
	<author>onefriedrice</author>
	<datestamp>1255624800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Intel can't lose.  Most people are going to get Windows 7 on a new PC (only a psycho would pay $299 for an operating system).  A large chunk of those new PCs are going to have Intel inside, whether they are Nehalems are not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Intel ca n't lose .
Most people are going to get Windows 7 on a new PC ( only a psycho would pay $ 299 for an operating system ) .
A large chunk of those new PCs are going to have Intel inside , whether they are Nehalems are not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Intel can't lose.
Most people are going to get Windows 7 on a new PC (only a psycho would pay $299 for an operating system).
A large chunk of those new PCs are going to have Intel inside, whether they are Nehalems are not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755577</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471</id>
	<title>Re:Balance Sheet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255612380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mac is like a high maintenance mistress, Windows is like a pricey Girlfriend, Ubuntu is like a wife.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mac is like a high maintenance mistress , Windows is like a pricey Girlfriend , Ubuntu is like a wife .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mac is like a high maintenance mistress, Windows is like a pricey Girlfriend, Ubuntu is like a wife.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755383</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758141</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255624860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"most of which were available in Vista too"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" most of which were available in Vista too "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"most of which were available in Vista too"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756297</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758631</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255626900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry - he should have added 'And it runs all your software' at the bottom.  Problem solved!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry - he should have added 'And it runs all your software ' at the bottom .
Problem solved !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry - he should have added 'And it runs all your software' at the bottom.
Problem solved!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756297</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756313</id>
	<title>Hey Michael Dell...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255617180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Instead of B.S.-ing us re: Windows 7 how about laying off fucking with the FDIC &amp; U.S. housing market?</p><p>http://housingstorm.com/2009/10/is-the-fdic-killing-short-sales/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of B.S.-ing us re : Windows 7 how about laying off fucking with the FDIC &amp; U.S. housing market ? http : //housingstorm.com/2009/10/is-the-fdic-killing-short-sales/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of B.S.-ing us re: Windows 7 how about laying off fucking with the FDIC &amp; U.S. housing market?http://housingstorm.com/2009/10/is-the-fdic-killing-short-sales/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756091</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255616280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;A good example of this is if you right click a task item on the task bar you get the various options such as restore move maximise ect, that is all gone now</p><p>Try shift+right click.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; A good example of this is if you right click a task item on the task bar you get the various options such as restore move maximise ect , that is all gone nowTry shift + right click .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;A good example of this is if you right click a task item on the task bar you get the various options such as restore move maximise ect, that is all gone nowTry shift+right click.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755567</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759041</id>
	<title>Michael Dell?  Yeah right</title>
	<author>alfredo</author>
	<datestamp>1255628760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Remember when he told Apple that they should shut down and return investor's money?  Yep, I'd venture to guess he is talking out the same orifice when he praises Windows7.

I'd put Apple's Market Cap up side Dell's any day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember when he told Apple that they should shut down and return investor 's money ?
Yep , I 'd venture to guess he is talking out the same orifice when he praises Windows7 .
I 'd put Apple 's Market Cap up side Dell 's any day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember when he told Apple that they should shut down and return investor's money?
Yep, I'd venture to guess he is talking out the same orifice when he praises Windows7.
I'd put Apple's Market Cap up side Dell's any day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757119</id>
	<title>Getting kicked in the nuts...</title>
	<author>Edweirdo</author>
	<datestamp>1255620720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How much do you think Microsoft paid him to say that?</p><p>Also, I've used Windows 7 a little trying to test it against some of the crap I have to support and I find it better then Vista.  But That is like saying getting kicked in the head is better than getting kicked in the nuts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How much do you think Microsoft paid him to say that ? Also , I 've used Windows 7 a little trying to test it against some of the crap I have to support and I find it better then Vista .
But That is like saying getting kicked in the head is better than getting kicked in the nuts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much do you think Microsoft paid him to say that?Also, I've used Windows 7 a little trying to test it against some of the crap I have to support and I find it better then Vista.
But That is like saying getting kicked in the head is better than getting kicked in the nuts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756221</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Ed Avis</author>
	<datestamp>1255616820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've never had the misfortune to use Vista, but of all I've read about its differences to XP, the only thing that appealed to me was better anti-aliased font rendering.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never had the misfortune to use Vista , but of all I 've read about its differences to XP , the only thing that appealed to me was better anti-aliased font rendering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never had the misfortune to use Vista, but of all I've read about its differences to XP, the only thing that appealed to me was better anti-aliased font rendering.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756631</id>
	<title>Safe 100\% Reliable Akademiks man Short T-Shirt</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255618740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Http://www.tntshoes.com<br>Our products are of good quality but reasonable price. And the price depends on the quantity. The more order, the better price.<br>AS  a professional exporting company dealing with sandals etc. We have wide and good business relations with many factories here. OUR COMPANY  accept small trial orders, even drop shipping business is welcome here. We have good business relations with express company here, and we have got the stocks here in our house ware, so we can ship the shoes immediately once we got the confirmation from you. Kindly let us know your interest and we will send you photo samples and quotations for you to study.</p><p>OUR WEBSITE:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Http://www.tntshoes.com</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Http : //www.tntshoes.comOur products are of good quality but reasonable price .
And the price depends on the quantity .
The more order , the better price.AS a professional exporting company dealing with sandals etc .
We have wide and good business relations with many factories here .
OUR COMPANY accept small trial orders , even drop shipping business is welcome here .
We have good business relations with express company here , and we have got the stocks here in our house ware , so we can ship the shoes immediately once we got the confirmation from you .
Kindly let us know your interest and we will send you photo samples and quotations for you to study.OUR WEBSITE :                                                             Http : //www.tntshoes.com                                                         YAHOO : shoppertrade @ yahoo.com.cn                                                                 MSN : shoppertrade @ hotmail.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Http://www.tntshoes.comOur products are of good quality but reasonable price.
And the price depends on the quantity.
The more order, the better price.AS  a professional exporting company dealing with sandals etc.
We have wide and good business relations with many factories here.
OUR COMPANY  accept small trial orders, even drop shipping business is welcome here.
We have good business relations with express company here, and we have got the stocks here in our house ware, so we can ship the shoes immediately once we got the confirmation from you.
Kindly let us know your interest and we will send you photo samples and quotations for you to study.OUR WEBSITE:
                                                            Http://www.tntshoes.com
                                                        YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn
                                                                MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755681</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>MtViewGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1255614000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One big advantage of Windows 7 over Windows XP: if you have a program crash, Windows 7 has <b>VASTLY</b> more graceful recovery, since it uses the same crash protection that Windows <i>Vista</i> uses.</p><p>I myself like Windows 7--it runs very well even on a machine with 2 GB of RAM, and some of the interface improvements are actually quite good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One big advantage of Windows 7 over Windows XP : if you have a program crash , Windows 7 has VASTLY more graceful recovery , since it uses the same crash protection that Windows Vista uses.I myself like Windows 7--it runs very well even on a machine with 2 GB of RAM , and some of the interface improvements are actually quite good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One big advantage of Windows 7 over Windows XP: if you have a program crash, Windows 7 has VASTLY more graceful recovery, since it uses the same crash protection that Windows Vista uses.I myself like Windows 7--it runs very well even on a machine with 2 GB of RAM, and some of the interface improvements are actually quite good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758367</id>
	<title>Better this, better that.</title>
	<author>jotaeleemeese</author>
	<datestamp>1255625760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How many "betters" are there?</p><p>Do you realize that saying something is better is something entirely subjective?</p><p>So bar a few improvements required to use newer hardware, there is actually nothing else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many " betters " are there ? Do you realize that saying something is better is something entirely subjective ? So bar a few improvements required to use newer hardware , there is actually nothing else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many "betters" are there?Do you realize that saying something is better is something entirely subjective?So bar a few improvements required to use newer hardware, there is actually nothing else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755873</id>
	<title>Has he borrowed...</title>
	<author>M-RES</author>
	<datestamp>1255615140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Has he borrowed Steve Jobs' Reality Distortion Field?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has he borrowed Steve Jobs ' Reality Distortion Field ?
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has he borrowed Steve Jobs' Reality Distortion Field?
:D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755523</id>
	<title>Tricky talk, in my opinion.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255612800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>My experience with Dell is that the company is tricky. I try to avoid Dell because for me the company does not make a good business partner, which is the relationship you have when you buy something technologically complicated from a company.

<br> <br>Quote from the story: <i>"He pointed out that many business are running Windows XP, which is eight years old."</i> [Should be <i>businesses</i>.]

<br> <br>That's a bit tricky, in my opinion. There is no migration path directly from Windows XP to Windows 7. If you are using Windows XP now, it is necessary to re-install ALL your applications, and re-configure ALL your settings. For us, that easily takes 40 hours. Windows XP has had a VERY high cost of ownership for us, and here we go again. Microsoft did not want to finish the work, apparently, and provide a way to convert automatically from Windows XP to Windows 7.

<br> <br>Also, Windows XP is not 8 years old, in my way of perceiving the matter. Windows XP was very troublesome until service pack 2 was released on August 25, 2004. So XP is actually 5 years old, because that is the date of what could be said to be the first release candidate.

<br> <br>It doesn't matter how old an OS is! We are not in the OS business. We are happy with what works for us.

<br> <br>In our experience it is better to buy components and build our own computers. The inside of a mass-market computer is amazing. Everywhere costs could have been cut, the components have been made a little cheaper, and sometimes a lot cheaper.</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My experience with Dell is that the company is tricky .
I try to avoid Dell because for me the company does not make a good business partner , which is the relationship you have when you buy something technologically complicated from a company .
Quote from the story : " He pointed out that many business are running Windows XP , which is eight years old .
" [ Should be businesses .
] That 's a bit tricky , in my opinion .
There is no migration path directly from Windows XP to Windows 7 .
If you are using Windows XP now , it is necessary to re-install ALL your applications , and re-configure ALL your settings .
For us , that easily takes 40 hours .
Windows XP has had a VERY high cost of ownership for us , and here we go again .
Microsoft did not want to finish the work , apparently , and provide a way to convert automatically from Windows XP to Windows 7 .
Also , Windows XP is not 8 years old , in my way of perceiving the matter .
Windows XP was very troublesome until service pack 2 was released on August 25 , 2004 .
So XP is actually 5 years old , because that is the date of what could be said to be the first release candidate .
It does n't matter how old an OS is !
We are not in the OS business .
We are happy with what works for us .
In our experience it is better to buy components and build our own computers .
The inside of a mass-market computer is amazing .
Everywhere costs could have been cut , the components have been made a little cheaper , and sometimes a lot cheaper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My experience with Dell is that the company is tricky.
I try to avoid Dell because for me the company does not make a good business partner, which is the relationship you have when you buy something technologically complicated from a company.
Quote from the story: "He pointed out that many business are running Windows XP, which is eight years old.
" [Should be businesses.
]

 That's a bit tricky, in my opinion.
There is no migration path directly from Windows XP to Windows 7.
If you are using Windows XP now, it is necessary to re-install ALL your applications, and re-configure ALL your settings.
For us, that easily takes 40 hours.
Windows XP has had a VERY high cost of ownership for us, and here we go again.
Microsoft did not want to finish the work, apparently, and provide a way to convert automatically from Windows XP to Windows 7.
Also, Windows XP is not 8 years old, in my way of perceiving the matter.
Windows XP was very troublesome until service pack 2 was released on August 25, 2004.
So XP is actually 5 years old, because that is the date of what could be said to be the first release candidate.
It doesn't matter how old an OS is!
We are not in the OS business.
We are happy with what works for us.
In our experience it is better to buy components and build our own computers.
The inside of a mass-market computer is amazing.
Everywhere costs could have been cut, the components have been made a little cheaper, and sometimes a lot cheaper.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756043</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Ephemeriis</author>
	<datestamp>1255616040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>For a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. geek, what does Windows 7 have that's *really* useful/desired/cool vs. Windows XP?  Not trolling, just haven't had the time to install it/play with it yet.</p></div><p>I don't know that there's a whole lot of genuinely <b>new</b> stuff in Win7...  It seems to me that Win7 is basically Vista done <i>right</i>.  So, a lot of what Win7 does looks pretty similar to what Vista does...  Except that Win7 <i>works</i>.</p><p>Compared to Vista, I've got better framerates in pretty much all my games.  The system seems more stable and more responsive.  Fewer weird issues/freezes/crashes.  UAC is actually useful now - it isn't quite as blunt an instrument.  It prompts for fewer things, and the things it prompts for actually make sense.</p><p>Compared to XP you've got a new GUI, which looks less like a Fisher Price toy and more like a piece of office furniture.  You've got new hardware support, new driver architecture, new DirectX...  You've got <b>very</b> uniform and mainstream 64-bit support.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For a / .
geek , what does Windows 7 have that 's * really * useful/desired/cool vs. Windows XP ?
Not trolling , just have n't had the time to install it/play with it yet.I do n't know that there 's a whole lot of genuinely new stuff in Win7... It seems to me that Win7 is basically Vista done right .
So , a lot of what Win7 does looks pretty similar to what Vista does... Except that Win7 works.Compared to Vista , I 've got better framerates in pretty much all my games .
The system seems more stable and more responsive .
Fewer weird issues/freezes/crashes .
UAC is actually useful now - it is n't quite as blunt an instrument .
It prompts for fewer things , and the things it prompts for actually make sense.Compared to XP you 've got a new GUI , which looks less like a Fisher Price toy and more like a piece of office furniture .
You 've got new hardware support , new driver architecture , new DirectX... You 've got very uniform and mainstream 64-bit support .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a /.
geek, what does Windows 7 have that's *really* useful/desired/cool vs. Windows XP?
Not trolling, just haven't had the time to install it/play with it yet.I don't know that there's a whole lot of genuinely new stuff in Win7...  It seems to me that Win7 is basically Vista done right.
So, a lot of what Win7 does looks pretty similar to what Vista does...  Except that Win7 works.Compared to Vista, I've got better framerates in pretty much all my games.
The system seems more stable and more responsive.
Fewer weird issues/freezes/crashes.
UAC is actually useful now - it isn't quite as blunt an instrument.
It prompts for fewer things, and the things it prompts for actually make sense.Compared to XP you've got a new GUI, which looks less like a Fisher Price toy and more like a piece of office furniture.
You've got new hardware support, new driver architecture, new DirectX...  You've got very uniform and mainstream 64-bit support.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755691</id>
	<title>He forgot to mention</title>
	<author>postmortem</author>
	<datestamp>1255614060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That Dell PCs and laptops bought in last 3-4 yrs should run Windows 7 so well that people don't need upgraded hardware - all they do need is better support from Dell for the existing hardware.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That Dell PCs and laptops bought in last 3-4 yrs should run Windows 7 so well that people do n't need upgraded hardware - all they do need is better support from Dell for the existing hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That Dell PCs and laptops bought in last 3-4 yrs should run Windows 7 so well that people don't need upgraded hardware - all they do need is better support from Dell for the existing hardware.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756779</id>
	<title>I love Windows 7!</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1255619400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The box makes such a good target at the firing range.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The box makes such a good target at the firing range .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The box makes such a good target at the firing range.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759501</id>
	<title>Re:Tricky talk, in my opinion.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255630860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At work, but we are officially running Vista with the xp rollback feature because most of your "non-computer users" all-around are too confused by anything more complex than point and click.</p><p>We are using a new software called OmniDx and people don't like it because it is purely text-driven and not mouse-friendly, so what I'm getting at is he probably assumes companies are using XP because all of the Vista rollouts are using the rollback feature for easier management and because from my experience, Vista doesn't listen well to what XP/2000 pro gpo's and such tell them.</p><p>I may be completely wrong but that's what I think from my experience.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At work , but we are officially running Vista with the xp rollback feature because most of your " non-computer users " all-around are too confused by anything more complex than point and click.We are using a new software called OmniDx and people do n't like it because it is purely text-driven and not mouse-friendly , so what I 'm getting at is he probably assumes companies are using XP because all of the Vista rollouts are using the rollback feature for easier management and because from my experience , Vista does n't listen well to what XP/2000 pro gpo 's and such tell them.I may be completely wrong but that 's what I think from my experience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At work, but we are officially running Vista with the xp rollback feature because most of your "non-computer users" all-around are too confused by anything more complex than point and click.We are using a new software called OmniDx and people don't like it because it is purely text-driven and not mouse-friendly, so what I'm getting at is he probably assumes companies are using XP because all of the Vista rollouts are using the rollback feature for easier management and because from my experience, Vista doesn't listen well to what XP/2000 pro gpo's and such tell them.I may be completely wrong but that's what I think from my experience.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755803</id>
	<title>We'll see...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255614660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lets hope so because I plan to wipe my XP 32bit install in my gaming rig (which should have been done 6 months ago) and perform a clean install of Windows 7 when my disc arrives.  It'll be nice to actually be able to USE all that RAM I have installed in it for a change.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lets hope so because I plan to wipe my XP 32bit install in my gaming rig ( which should have been done 6 months ago ) and perform a clean install of Windows 7 when my disc arrives .
It 'll be nice to actually be able to USE all that RAM I have installed in it for a change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lets hope so because I plan to wipe my XP 32bit install in my gaming rig (which should have been done 6 months ago) and perform a clean install of Windows 7 when my disc arrives.
It'll be nice to actually be able to USE all that RAM I have installed in it for a change.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757939</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>HangingChad</author>
	<datestamp>1255623960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>NOTE: These are benefits when upgrading from XP.</i>

</p><p>That's the truth Dell and Microsoft want to get out there, but for enterprise customers the transition is going to be expensive and painful. You'd think a company with Microsoft's resources would have created a paved road for transitioning from XP to Windows 7.  That's where all the big sales will come from.  But that transition is a rocky road, a rocky toll road.

</p><p>People buying a new PC won't really care what's on it, as long as it isn't Vista. But enterprise customers...there are going to be a lot of new gray hairs at the c level.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NOTE : These are benefits when upgrading from XP .
That 's the truth Dell and Microsoft want to get out there , but for enterprise customers the transition is going to be expensive and painful .
You 'd think a company with Microsoft 's resources would have created a paved road for transitioning from XP to Windows 7 .
That 's where all the big sales will come from .
But that transition is a rocky road , a rocky toll road .
People buying a new PC wo n't really care what 's on it , as long as it is n't Vista .
But enterprise customers...there are going to be a lot of new gray hairs at the c level .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> NOTE: These are benefits when upgrading from XP.
That's the truth Dell and Microsoft want to get out there, but for enterprise customers the transition is going to be expensive and painful.
You'd think a company with Microsoft's resources would have created a paved road for transitioning from XP to Windows 7.
That's where all the big sales will come from.
But that transition is a rocky road, a rocky toll road.
People buying a new PC won't really care what's on it, as long as it isn't Vista.
But enterprise customers...there are going to be a lot of new gray hairs at the c level.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755833</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755633</id>
	<title>Michael Dell</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1255613700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And I say that Micky D can fuck off.  Who's right?  Only time will tell...</htmltext>
<tokenext>And I say that Micky D can fuck off .
Who 's right ?
Only time will tell.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I say that Micky D can fuck off.
Who's right?
Only time will tell...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757767</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1255623360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pros:</p><ul> <li>Fewer UAC alerts than Vista</li><li>The UI gets higher priority, or they tweaked it in a sense to make the UI seem more responsive. This does not mean your computer is really faster than using XP or Vista. In fact, despite all the claims of how "fast" 7 is, it still requires considerably more hardware than XP.</li><li>Vista had a new driver model that was terrible, which really hurt performance. It is better in 7, which helps video performance. Is it any better than XP? Not really.</li><li>The taskbar is pretty damned sweet. It not only looks good, but it is useful in helping you select the right window with Aero Peek. I now use the same feature in Linux on KDE 4 with the "smooth tasks" plasmoid.</li><li>Window tiling is fantastic. Why has kwin not implemented this yet? I don't care if it is copying. It is a great feature. I throw a window to the top, and it maximizes. I throw it to the left or right and it takes up exactly half of the screen. I can also use easy keyboard shortcuts.</li><li>Windows 7 has "library" support which can track media file across multiple hard drives or folders. Given that your music player of choice should be able to do the same thing, and really, you should just fucking organize your files, I don't see this as a huge win. But it is there.</li><li>Native ipv6 support. Linux has had this for eons, and you may be behind an ipv4 router anyway, but it counts as an improvement.</li><li>DirectX 11 for when you eventually have a DirectX 11 video card, and DirectX 11 games.</li></ul><p>Cons:</p><ul> <li>UAC is still annoying.</li><li>Most of the Vista UI regressions are still present. You still have to use 10 clicks to perform a task that was 5 clicks in XP.</li><li>Your printer that works in XP likely doesn't have a driver in 7.</li><li>Many of your XP apps and games that had compatibility problems in Vista, still aren't going to work. In fact, even more apps will be broken in 7. I found many XP games were a real pain to get working in 7, or just plain didn't work at all. So much for 7 being great for gamers. If you get Windows 7 Ultimate, it includes a VM install of XP, but that will kill game performance. If you're ultimately just going to need XP to play games, why not stick with XP? Not to mention Ultimate is expensive, so most users don't have this capability.</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pros : Fewer UAC alerts than VistaThe UI gets higher priority , or they tweaked it in a sense to make the UI seem more responsive .
This does not mean your computer is really faster than using XP or Vista .
In fact , despite all the claims of how " fast " 7 is , it still requires considerably more hardware than XP.Vista had a new driver model that was terrible , which really hurt performance .
It is better in 7 , which helps video performance .
Is it any better than XP ?
Not really.The taskbar is pretty damned sweet .
It not only looks good , but it is useful in helping you select the right window with Aero Peek .
I now use the same feature in Linux on KDE 4 with the " smooth tasks " plasmoid.Window tiling is fantastic .
Why has kwin not implemented this yet ?
I do n't care if it is copying .
It is a great feature .
I throw a window to the top , and it maximizes .
I throw it to the left or right and it takes up exactly half of the screen .
I can also use easy keyboard shortcuts.Windows 7 has " library " support which can track media file across multiple hard drives or folders .
Given that your music player of choice should be able to do the same thing , and really , you should just fucking organize your files , I do n't see this as a huge win .
But it is there.Native ipv6 support .
Linux has had this for eons , and you may be behind an ipv4 router anyway , but it counts as an improvement.DirectX 11 for when you eventually have a DirectX 11 video card , and DirectX 11 games.Cons : UAC is still annoying.Most of the Vista UI regressions are still present .
You still have to use 10 clicks to perform a task that was 5 clicks in XP.Your printer that works in XP likely does n't have a driver in 7.Many of your XP apps and games that had compatibility problems in Vista , still are n't going to work .
In fact , even more apps will be broken in 7 .
I found many XP games were a real pain to get working in 7 , or just plain did n't work at all .
So much for 7 being great for gamers .
If you get Windows 7 Ultimate , it includes a VM install of XP , but that will kill game performance .
If you 're ultimately just going to need XP to play games , why not stick with XP ?
Not to mention Ultimate is expensive , so most users do n't have this capability .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pros: Fewer UAC alerts than VistaThe UI gets higher priority, or they tweaked it in a sense to make the UI seem more responsive.
This does not mean your computer is really faster than using XP or Vista.
In fact, despite all the claims of how "fast" 7 is, it still requires considerably more hardware than XP.Vista had a new driver model that was terrible, which really hurt performance.
It is better in 7, which helps video performance.
Is it any better than XP?
Not really.The taskbar is pretty damned sweet.
It not only looks good, but it is useful in helping you select the right window with Aero Peek.
I now use the same feature in Linux on KDE 4 with the "smooth tasks" plasmoid.Window tiling is fantastic.
Why has kwin not implemented this yet?
I don't care if it is copying.
It is a great feature.
I throw a window to the top, and it maximizes.
I throw it to the left or right and it takes up exactly half of the screen.
I can also use easy keyboard shortcuts.Windows 7 has "library" support which can track media file across multiple hard drives or folders.
Given that your music player of choice should be able to do the same thing, and really, you should just fucking organize your files, I don't see this as a huge win.
But it is there.Native ipv6 support.
Linux has had this for eons, and you may be behind an ipv4 router anyway, but it counts as an improvement.DirectX 11 for when you eventually have a DirectX 11 video card, and DirectX 11 games.Cons: UAC is still annoying.Most of the Vista UI regressions are still present.
You still have to use 10 clicks to perform a task that was 5 clicks in XP.Your printer that works in XP likely doesn't have a driver in 7.Many of your XP apps and games that had compatibility problems in Vista, still aren't going to work.
In fact, even more apps will be broken in 7.
I found many XP games were a real pain to get working in 7, or just plain didn't work at all.
So much for 7 being great for gamers.
If you get Windows 7 Ultimate, it includes a VM install of XP, but that will kill game performance.
If you're ultimately just going to need XP to play games, why not stick with XP?
Not to mention Ultimate is expensive, so most users don't have this capability.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758627</id>
	<title>Re:Balance Sheet</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1255626900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Mac is like a high maintenance mistress, Windows is like a pricey Girlfriend, Ubuntu is like a wife.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Sounds like I don't want an OS. What is the equivalent of single? Booting to a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forth\_(programming\_language)" title="wikipedia.org">Forth</a> [wikipedia.org] prompt?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mac is like a high maintenance mistress , Windows is like a pricey Girlfriend , Ubuntu is like a wife .
Sounds like I do n't want an OS .
What is the equivalent of single ?
Booting to a Forth [ wikipedia.org ] prompt ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mac is like a high maintenance mistress, Windows is like a pricey Girlfriend, Ubuntu is like a wife.
Sounds like I don't want an OS.
What is the equivalent of single?
Booting to a Forth [wikipedia.org] prompt?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758123</id>
	<title>Re:Tricky talk, in my opinion.</title>
	<author>MarkvW</author>
	<datestamp>1255624740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I won't EVER buy a Dell again.  I bought one for my wife and the motherboard went (just after warranty).  The company made inconsistent statements about motherboard availability and never could provide me with a replacement.</p><p>The irony is that I build my own computers, but I bought my wife one so that maintenance wouldn't be a problem.  The HELL with DELL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wo n't EVER buy a Dell again .
I bought one for my wife and the motherboard went ( just after warranty ) .
The company made inconsistent statements about motherboard availability and never could provide me with a replacement.The irony is that I build my own computers , but I bought my wife one so that maintenance would n't be a problem .
The HELL with DELL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I won't EVER buy a Dell again.
I bought one for my wife and the motherboard went (just after warranty).
The company made inconsistent statements about motherboard availability and never could provide me with a replacement.The irony is that I build my own computers, but I bought my wife one so that maintenance wouldn't be a problem.
The HELL with DELL.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756077</id>
	<title>I WANT MORE XP, FUCKER</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1255616220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bring back the menu bar, the task bar, the simple start menu. Adding more layers of spam to the user interface doesn't make me happy. Simplify, simplify, simplify...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bring back the menu bar , the task bar , the simple start menu .
Adding more layers of spam to the user interface does n't make me happy .
Simplify , simplify , simplify.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bring back the menu bar, the task bar, the simple start menu.
Adding more layers of spam to the user interface doesn't make me happy.
Simplify, simplify, simplify...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755657</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255613820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've even stopped using linux at home.</p></div><p>LIAR!!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've even stopped using linux at home.LIAR !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've even stopped using linux at home.LIAR!
!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755477</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755477</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Splab</author>
	<datestamp>1255612440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's just better.</p><p>I upgraded to windows 7 pro about a month ago (through MSDNAA) and I've even stopped using linux at home.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's just better.I upgraded to windows 7 pro about a month ago ( through MSDNAA ) and I 've even stopped using linux at home .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's just better.I upgraded to windows 7 pro about a month ago (through MSDNAA) and I've even stopped using linux at home.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758281</id>
	<title>And ReMax says it's a good time buy a house</title>
	<author>walterbyrd</author>
	<datestamp>1255625400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In other startling news: car makers say it's a good time to buy a car, NASSCOM claims the US needs more guest workers, and Apple claims you will love the new iPhone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In other startling news : car makers say it 's a good time to buy a car , NASSCOM claims the US needs more guest workers , and Apple claims you will love the new iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other startling news: car makers say it's a good time to buy a car, NASSCOM claims the US needs more guest workers, and Apple claims you will love the new iPhone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755901</id>
	<title>Re:Balance Sheet</title>
	<author>intheshelter</author>
	<datestamp>1255615260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Correction, Windows is like a high maintenance girlfriend that is never happy no matter how much attention you lavish on her.  Linux is like a girl who is a little fugly, but if you spend enormous amounts of time and effort on her she looks really good.  Mac is your trophy wife with a PHD that doesn't require you to waste time "taking care of her", and she's ready to do anything you want all the time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Correction , Windows is like a high maintenance girlfriend that is never happy no matter how much attention you lavish on her .
Linux is like a girl who is a little fugly , but if you spend enormous amounts of time and effort on her she looks really good .
Mac is your trophy wife with a PHD that does n't require you to waste time " taking care of her " , and she 's ready to do anything you want all the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correction, Windows is like a high maintenance girlfriend that is never happy no matter how much attention you lavish on her.
Linux is like a girl who is a little fugly, but if you spend enormous amounts of time and effort on her she looks really good.
Mac is your trophy wife with a PHD that doesn't require you to waste time "taking care of her", and she's ready to do anything you want all the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755983</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255615740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How? For me it has crashed more than XP has done in ages. It's "Vista slow" and the interface looks like someone took a Mac and beat it with a fugly stick.<br>Hell, it is Vista, just a new name and a new taskbar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How ?
For me it has crashed more than XP has done in ages .
It 's " Vista slow " and the interface looks like someone took a Mac and beat it with a fugly stick.Hell , it is Vista , just a new name and a new taskbar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How?
For me it has crashed more than XP has done in ages.
It's "Vista slow" and the interface looks like someone took a Mac and beat it with a fugly stick.Hell, it is Vista, just a new name and a new taskbar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755477</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29760745</id>
	<title>Re:Not going to happen</title>
	<author>QRDeNameland</author>
	<datestamp>1255636380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>To be attractive to small businesses, Microsoft need to offer Windows 7 pro OEM license packs at reduced rates. </p></div><p>In my experience, it is not the cost of Windows itself which deter small businesses from upgrading; rather it is the much larger costs of implementation, testing, potential hardware/software upgrades, and the risk of business disruption that accompany large scale changes to a business' IT ecosystem that makes upgrading a daunting proposition.  (This does not only apply to Windows, nor just to small businesses.)  In order to give MS a couple hundred bucks per desktop for their latest OS upgrade, the associated costs to deal with the fallout might be an order of magnitude higher than that.

</p><p>In the small IT shop where I work, MS could offers Win7 upgrades for free (or for that matter, *pay us* $100 per seat to upgrade) and we still wouldn't be upgrading any time soon, simply because we can't afford to marshall the resources to do the upgrades absent any concrete business case to do so.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To be attractive to small businesses , Microsoft need to offer Windows 7 pro OEM license packs at reduced rates .
In my experience , it is not the cost of Windows itself which deter small businesses from upgrading ; rather it is the much larger costs of implementation , testing , potential hardware/software upgrades , and the risk of business disruption that accompany large scale changes to a business ' IT ecosystem that makes upgrading a daunting proposition .
( This does not only apply to Windows , nor just to small businesses .
) In order to give MS a couple hundred bucks per desktop for their latest OS upgrade , the associated costs to deal with the fallout might be an order of magnitude higher than that .
In the small IT shop where I work , MS could offers Win7 upgrades for free ( or for that matter , * pay us * $ 100 per seat to upgrade ) and we still would n't be upgrading any time soon , simply because we ca n't afford to marshall the resources to do the upgrades absent any concrete business case to do so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be attractive to small businesses, Microsoft need to offer Windows 7 pro OEM license packs at reduced rates.
In my experience, it is not the cost of Windows itself which deter small businesses from upgrading; rather it is the much larger costs of implementation, testing, potential hardware/software upgrades, and the risk of business disruption that accompany large scale changes to a business' IT ecosystem that makes upgrading a daunting proposition.
(This does not only apply to Windows, nor just to small businesses.
)  In order to give MS a couple hundred bucks per desktop for their latest OS upgrade, the associated costs to deal with the fallout might be an order of magnitude higher than that.
In the small IT shop where I work, MS could offers Win7 upgrades for free (or for that matter, *pay us* $100 per seat to upgrade) and we still wouldn't be upgrading any time soon, simply because we can't afford to marshall the resources to do the upgrades absent any concrete business case to do so.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755663</id>
	<title>ho hum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255613880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>8 yrs and XP still meets all our needs.</p><p>They always say the new features will change the way we do things but they never do.  Collaborative features only go so far and 80\% of what spreadsheets are used for was available with VisiCalc.  Word still unexpectedly screws up bullets, lists, line spacing etc.  There will be some new auto-correct feature that wastes time until the hidden option selection is found to turn it off.</p><p>It seems that we have to pay a lot of money to do the same things with new software that requires an expensive upgrade/rollout cycle for both the s/w and supporting h/w.</p><p>At least there is a reason for the h/w upgrades: after five or six years notebooks, keyboards etc are getting pretty beat up.  Also energy efficiency has improved (LCDs vs CRTs, better CPUs).</p><p>Mostly, we would just ignore Windows 7 if we could, even if it is nifty.  Vista passed by with hardly a second glance but there are difficulties with getting more than two major versions behind.</p><p>Oh well, I guess most people out there do much more than email, docs, spreadsheets and file transfers.  I'm sure they really are thrilled with the new offering.  We're just stuck doing mundane business to earn a living.  Sigh.</p><p>I wonder if the window theme has changed: move the close to the center and make it an O instead of an X.  Or...  arbitrary spline curves to shape the dialog boxes instead of boring rectilinear crap.  Note boxes at odd angles, like on a desk, instead of all of this horizontally aligned s**t.</p><p>A whole new class of system calls.</p><p>Yeah that would make things better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>8 yrs and XP still meets all our needs.They always say the new features will change the way we do things but they never do .
Collaborative features only go so far and 80 \ % of what spreadsheets are used for was available with VisiCalc .
Word still unexpectedly screws up bullets , lists , line spacing etc .
There will be some new auto-correct feature that wastes time until the hidden option selection is found to turn it off.It seems that we have to pay a lot of money to do the same things with new software that requires an expensive upgrade/rollout cycle for both the s/w and supporting h/w.At least there is a reason for the h/w upgrades : after five or six years notebooks , keyboards etc are getting pretty beat up .
Also energy efficiency has improved ( LCDs vs CRTs , better CPUs ) .Mostly , we would just ignore Windows 7 if we could , even if it is nifty .
Vista passed by with hardly a second glance but there are difficulties with getting more than two major versions behind.Oh well , I guess most people out there do much more than email , docs , spreadsheets and file transfers .
I 'm sure they really are thrilled with the new offering .
We 're just stuck doing mundane business to earn a living .
Sigh.I wonder if the window theme has changed : move the close to the center and make it an O instead of an X. Or... arbitrary spline curves to shape the dialog boxes instead of boring rectilinear crap .
Note boxes at odd angles , like on a desk , instead of all of this horizontally aligned s * * t.A whole new class of system calls.Yeah that would make things better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>8 yrs and XP still meets all our needs.They always say the new features will change the way we do things but they never do.
Collaborative features only go so far and 80\% of what spreadsheets are used for was available with VisiCalc.
Word still unexpectedly screws up bullets, lists, line spacing etc.
There will be some new auto-correct feature that wastes time until the hidden option selection is found to turn it off.It seems that we have to pay a lot of money to do the same things with new software that requires an expensive upgrade/rollout cycle for both the s/w and supporting h/w.At least there is a reason for the h/w upgrades: after five or six years notebooks, keyboards etc are getting pretty beat up.
Also energy efficiency has improved (LCDs vs CRTs, better CPUs).Mostly, we would just ignore Windows 7 if we could, even if it is nifty.
Vista passed by with hardly a second glance but there are difficulties with getting more than two major versions behind.Oh well, I guess most people out there do much more than email, docs, spreadsheets and file transfers.
I'm sure they really are thrilled with the new offering.
We're just stuck doing mundane business to earn a living.
Sigh.I wonder if the window theme has changed: move the close to the center and make it an O instead of an X.  Or...  arbitrary spline curves to shape the dialog boxes instead of boring rectilinear crap.
Note boxes at odd angles, like on a desk, instead of all of this horizontally aligned s**t.A whole new class of system calls.Yeah that would make things better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755505</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255612620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Depends on what kind of geek you are. Me personally, I don't usually care for much of the visuals in most OSs so I guess this most useful feature for me is the new taskbar. I cant say if the entire OS is worth the $200 or w/e they're charging but since I got mine for $30 in an edu discount deal type thing, it was worth it for me.</p><p>As a developer, I'm much more interested in some of the under teh hood changes and I'll probably get around to downloading the platform SDK once I have some free time and taking a peek.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends on what kind of geek you are .
Me personally , I do n't usually care for much of the visuals in most OSs so I guess this most useful feature for me is the new taskbar .
I cant say if the entire OS is worth the $ 200 or w/e they 're charging but since I got mine for $ 30 in an edu discount deal type thing , it was worth it for me.As a developer , I 'm much more interested in some of the under teh hood changes and I 'll probably get around to downloading the platform SDK once I have some free time and taking a peek .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends on what kind of geek you are.
Me personally, I don't usually care for much of the visuals in most OSs so I guess this most useful feature for me is the new taskbar.
I cant say if the entire OS is worth the $200 or w/e they're charging but since I got mine for $30 in an edu discount deal type thing, it was worth it for me.As a developer, I'm much more interested in some of the under teh hood changes and I'll probably get around to downloading the platform SDK once I have some free time and taking a peek.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756989</id>
	<title>Michael Dell recommends</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1255620180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>Michael Dell recommends Windows 7 Ultimate Edition.</b></p><p>(I figured there was a requirement that statement appear anywhere Dell is involved, based on the last several catalogs I've received from them)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Michael Dell recommends Windows 7 Ultimate Edition .
( I figured there was a requirement that statement appear anywhere Dell is involved , based on the last several catalogs I 've received from them )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Michael Dell recommends Windows 7 Ultimate Edition.
(I figured there was a requirement that statement appear anywhere Dell is involved, based on the last several catalogs I've received from them)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755515</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm...</title>
	<author>operator\_error</author>
	<datestamp>1255612680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Try moving your finger lower and a little bit to the left, and maybe somewhat faster? Oh wait, you said narcissistic. Oops, my bad; nevermind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try moving your finger lower and a little bit to the left , and maybe somewhat faster ?
Oh wait , you said narcissistic .
Oops , my bad ; nevermind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try moving your finger lower and a little bit to the left, and maybe somewhat faster?
Oh wait, you said narcissistic.
Oops, my bad; nevermind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756049</id>
	<title>Re:Tricky talk, in my opinion.</title>
	<author>RulerOf</author>
	<datestamp>1255616040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Microsoft did not want to finish the work, apparently, and provide a way to convert automatically from Windows XP to Windows 7.</p> </div><p>Um... You can transfer your profile, and programs can be reinstalled using the same MSI's.<br> <br>If you're in a managed network (and business users <i>should</i> be), you throw a Windows 7 machine into an Active Directory OU, and all of your policies, including Software Installation ones, apply to the machine and it behaves just like the XP ones in the same Unit.<br> <br>Business users don't "Upgrade" operating systems in the classical sense anyway.  When it's time for an OS upgrade, the disk gets nuked and re-imaged.  There's nothing at all about Windows 7 that changes the validity of <i>that</i> procedure.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft did not want to finish the work , apparently , and provide a way to convert automatically from Windows XP to Windows 7 .
Um... You can transfer your profile , and programs can be reinstalled using the same MSI 's .
If you 're in a managed network ( and business users should be ) , you throw a Windows 7 machine into an Active Directory OU , and all of your policies , including Software Installation ones , apply to the machine and it behaves just like the XP ones in the same Unit .
Business users do n't " Upgrade " operating systems in the classical sense anyway .
When it 's time for an OS upgrade , the disk gets nuked and re-imaged .
There 's nothing at all about Windows 7 that changes the validity of that procedure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft did not want to finish the work, apparently, and provide a way to convert automatically from Windows XP to Windows 7.
Um... You can transfer your profile, and programs can be reinstalled using the same MSI's.
If you're in a managed network (and business users should be), you throw a Windows 7 machine into an Active Directory OU, and all of your policies, including Software Installation ones, apply to the machine and it behaves just like the XP ones in the same Unit.
Business users don't "Upgrade" operating systems in the classical sense anyway.
When it's time for an OS upgrade, the disk gets nuked and re-imaged.
There's nothing at all about Windows 7 that changes the validity of that procedure.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757873</id>
	<title>Re:Balance Sheet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255623720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jeez, with long running threads like these, wow, sure, I mean, the manz are totally right, sexism among geeks, it doesn't exist, I'm sorry I ever doubted any of the males in here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jeez , with long running threads like these , wow , sure , I mean , the manz are totally right , sexism among geeks , it does n't exist , I 'm sorry I ever doubted any of the males in here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jeez, with long running threads like these, wow, sure, I mean, the manz are totally right, sexism among geeks, it doesn't exist, I'm sorry I ever doubted any of the males in here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757105</id>
	<title>Re:Not going to happen</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255620660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>There is no business case for spending the kind of money necessary to upgrade everything, just so that your CEO can have "that big task bar".</p></div></blockquote><p>Quite.  To be attractive to small businesses, Microsoft need to offer Windows 7 pro OEM license packs at reduced rates.  This isn't the nineties, the OS is a commodity and a linux server and a few client machines with a decent web browser can suffice for the majority of a small businesses needs.  Microsoft are going to be irrelevant in 5 years time the way they're going about their licensing.</p><p>If Microsoft reduced the price by a third, I've a few small businesses clients that could be persudaded to upgrade.  As it is, these clients may as well install linux and run XP in a VM for legacy (as in MS Windows) apps.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no business case for spending the kind of money necessary to upgrade everything , just so that your CEO can have " that big task bar " .Quite .
To be attractive to small businesses , Microsoft need to offer Windows 7 pro OEM license packs at reduced rates .
This is n't the nineties , the OS is a commodity and a linux server and a few client machines with a decent web browser can suffice for the majority of a small businesses needs .
Microsoft are going to be irrelevant in 5 years time the way they 're going about their licensing.If Microsoft reduced the price by a third , I 've a few small businesses clients that could be persudaded to upgrade .
As it is , these clients may as well install linux and run XP in a VM for legacy ( as in MS Windows ) apps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no business case for spending the kind of money necessary to upgrade everything, just so that your CEO can have "that big task bar".Quite.
To be attractive to small businesses, Microsoft need to offer Windows 7 pro OEM license packs at reduced rates.
This isn't the nineties, the OS is a commodity and a linux server and a few client machines with a decent web browser can suffice for the majority of a small businesses needs.
Microsoft are going to be irrelevant in 5 years time the way they're going about their licensing.If Microsoft reduced the price by a third, I've a few small businesses clients that could be persudaded to upgrade.
As it is, these clients may as well install linux and run XP in a VM for legacy (as in MS Windows) apps.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755601</id>
	<title>Not going to happen</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255613460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's the problem: Windows XP, for the majority of normal use cases, works. There is no business case for spending the kind of money necessary to upgrade everything, just so that your CEO can have "that big task bar".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's the problem : Windows XP , for the majority of normal use cases , works .
There is no business case for spending the kind of money necessary to upgrade everything , just so that your CEO can have " that big task bar " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's the problem: Windows XP, for the majority of normal use cases, works.
There is no business case for spending the kind of money necessary to upgrade everything, just so that your CEO can have "that big task bar".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29763245</id>
	<title>Linux made me</title>
	<author>vga\_init</author>
	<datestamp>1255604460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Linux made me love computers; Windows made me hate Microsoft.</p><p>Windows 7 makes me like Windows.  It's a good product.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux made me love computers ; Windows made me hate Microsoft.Windows 7 makes me like Windows .
It 's a good product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux made me love computers; Windows made me hate Microsoft.Windows 7 makes me like Windows.
It's a good product.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759983</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1255632840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's your point?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's your point ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's your point?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756297</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758665</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255627080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Nearly all of these "features" have been in both Linux and Mac OS X for years</i></p><p>Yeah, and they've been in Windows for years, too.  It was called Vista, and it shipped with security features even OSX didn't have at the time (Apple still has issues with their implementation of ASLR even though it came late to the party).</p><p>Most people stuck their head in the sand and ignored Vista because of FUD.  You're welcome to continue doing so when Windows 7 ships, if you'd like, but <i>please</i> stop writing garbage posts regurgitating the same BS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nearly all of these " features " have been in both Linux and Mac OS X for yearsYeah , and they 've been in Windows for years , too .
It was called Vista , and it shipped with security features even OSX did n't have at the time ( Apple still has issues with their implementation of ASLR even though it came late to the party ) .Most people stuck their head in the sand and ignored Vista because of FUD .
You 're welcome to continue doing so when Windows 7 ships , if you 'd like , but please stop writing garbage posts regurgitating the same BS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nearly all of these "features" have been in both Linux and Mac OS X for yearsYeah, and they've been in Windows for years, too.
It was called Vista, and it shipped with security features even OSX didn't have at the time (Apple still has issues with their implementation of ASLR even though it came late to the party).Most people stuck their head in the sand and ignored Vista because of FUD.
You're welcome to continue doing so when Windows 7 ships, if you'd like, but please stop writing garbage posts regurgitating the same BS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756297</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758921</id>
	<title>Re:I've been running it for months too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255628280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So in short, Dell's saying, "If you buy new hardware that's 5x faster and has 5x more memory than what you have now, you'll almost manage to not feel the suck!" Yeah, makes me want to run out and buy Windows 7 right away...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So in short , Dell 's saying , " If you buy new hardware that 's 5x faster and has 5x more memory than what you have now , you 'll almost manage to not feel the suck !
" Yeah , makes me want to run out and buy Windows 7 right away.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So in short, Dell's saying, "If you buy new hardware that's 5x faster and has 5x more memory than what you have now, you'll almost manage to not feel the suck!
" Yeah, makes me want to run out and buy Windows 7 right away...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29760375</id>
	<title>One Concern of Mine: Sound Quality</title>
	<author>QJimbo</author>
	<datestamp>1255634400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Regardless of soundcard, and regardless of settings, Windows Vista and the last Windows 7 beta I used (though this was some time ago now, around December last year) had absolutely awful sound quality, when compared to XP or Linux. It seems that the mixer and all the other parts of the sound engine interfere with the sound causing it to lose fidelity and bass to the point where I could identify a Vista machine in a blind listening test. Has this been fixed? As a musician it's kind of important...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Regardless of soundcard , and regardless of settings , Windows Vista and the last Windows 7 beta I used ( though this was some time ago now , around December last year ) had absolutely awful sound quality , when compared to XP or Linux .
It seems that the mixer and all the other parts of the sound engine interfere with the sound causing it to lose fidelity and bass to the point where I could identify a Vista machine in a blind listening test .
Has this been fixed ?
As a musician it 's kind of important.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Regardless of soundcard, and regardless of settings, Windows Vista and the last Windows 7 beta I used (though this was some time ago now, around December last year) had absolutely awful sound quality, when compared to XP or Linux.
It seems that the mixer and all the other parts of the sound engine interfere with the sound causing it to lose fidelity and bass to the point where I could identify a Vista machine in a blind listening test.
Has this been fixed?
As a musician it's kind of important...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29762111</id>
	<title>Slashdot is gone...</title>
	<author>alukin</author>
	<datestamp>1255600020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. slowly becomes one of that   paid Windows fans site.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems that / .
slowly becomes one of that paid Windows fans site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems that /.
slowly becomes one of that   paid Windows fans site.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758015</id>
	<title>Re:Tricky talk, in my opinion.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255624320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>There is no migration path directly from Windows XP to Windows 7.</i></p><p>Never do upgrades, it's the best opportunity to clean the trash out of the registry.  It'll improve the speed and stability of the PC.</p><p><i>In our experience it is better to buy components and build our own computers.</i></p><p>I haven't bought a Dell in about 5 years, and haven't built a white box machine for even longer.  But unless you are VERY specific about the components you want (or intend to reuse from an existing machine), it's hard to match the price of a complete system.  And if you factor in time for troubleshooting defective components/compatibility, it doesn't make sense to build one-off systems.</p><p>I was really impressed with the quality of the case of the Dell SC400 servers.  Not only are they easy to work with, the wires are all neatly tied, there are no sharp edges to cut you, and they are the quietest machines I've ever owned.  Antec is the best white box case I have used.</p><p>As far as upgrading to Windows 7 is concerned, for many of us there is no advantage to it.  The things that have been driving base PC requirements are OS releases and gaming.  Windows 7 offers flashy new features and moves everything around so you have to re-learn the OS.  And it requires new hardware.  As for gaming, I personally don't have any interest in any that a few simple upgrades (video and RAM) wouldn't suffice.  I'm not a bleeding edge gamer.  And the only business apps I can think of would be niche products; video editing, game development, and maybe CAD.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no migration path directly from Windows XP to Windows 7.Never do upgrades , it 's the best opportunity to clean the trash out of the registry .
It 'll improve the speed and stability of the PC.In our experience it is better to buy components and build our own computers.I have n't bought a Dell in about 5 years , and have n't built a white box machine for even longer .
But unless you are VERY specific about the components you want ( or intend to reuse from an existing machine ) , it 's hard to match the price of a complete system .
And if you factor in time for troubleshooting defective components/compatibility , it does n't make sense to build one-off systems.I was really impressed with the quality of the case of the Dell SC400 servers .
Not only are they easy to work with , the wires are all neatly tied , there are no sharp edges to cut you , and they are the quietest machines I 've ever owned .
Antec is the best white box case I have used.As far as upgrading to Windows 7 is concerned , for many of us there is no advantage to it .
The things that have been driving base PC requirements are OS releases and gaming .
Windows 7 offers flashy new features and moves everything around so you have to re-learn the OS .
And it requires new hardware .
As for gaming , I personally do n't have any interest in any that a few simple upgrades ( video and RAM ) would n't suffice .
I 'm not a bleeding edge gamer .
And the only business apps I can think of would be niche products ; video editing , game development , and maybe CAD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no migration path directly from Windows XP to Windows 7.Never do upgrades, it's the best opportunity to clean the trash out of the registry.
It'll improve the speed and stability of the PC.In our experience it is better to buy components and build our own computers.I haven't bought a Dell in about 5 years, and haven't built a white box machine for even longer.
But unless you are VERY specific about the components you want (or intend to reuse from an existing machine), it's hard to match the price of a complete system.
And if you factor in time for troubleshooting defective components/compatibility, it doesn't make sense to build one-off systems.I was really impressed with the quality of the case of the Dell SC400 servers.
Not only are they easy to work with, the wires are all neatly tied, there are no sharp edges to cut you, and they are the quietest machines I've ever owned.
Antec is the best white box case I have used.As far as upgrading to Windows 7 is concerned, for many of us there is no advantage to it.
The things that have been driving base PC requirements are OS releases and gaming.
Windows 7 offers flashy new features and moves everything around so you have to re-learn the OS.
And it requires new hardware.
As for gaming, I personally don't have any interest in any that a few simple upgrades (video and RAM) wouldn't suffice.
I'm not a bleeding edge gamer.
And the only business apps I can think of would be niche products; video editing, game development, and maybe CAD.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29760013</id>
	<title>LAUGH  in dells face</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255633020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yeah, a new processor, new office, new windows...THEN  i wont get viruses, huh?<br>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA<br>I LAUGH IN YOUR FACE DELL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah , a new processor , new office , new windows...THEN i wont get viruses , huh ? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAI LAUGH IN YOUR FACE DELL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah, a new processor, new office, new windows...THEN  i wont get viruses, huh?HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAI LAUGH IN YOUR FACE DELL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758217</id>
	<title>Re:Balance Sheet</title>
	<author>hondo77</author>
	<datestamp>1255625220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Mac is like a high maintenance mistress, Windows is like a pricey Girlfriend, Ubuntu is like a wife.</p></div><p>So the Mac costs more but will do whatever I want, Windows might do what I want sometimes but I have to work really hard at it, and Ubuntu won't do what I want and doesn't even pretend to care?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mac is like a high maintenance mistress , Windows is like a pricey Girlfriend , Ubuntu is like a wife.So the Mac costs more but will do whatever I want , Windows might do what I want sometimes but I have to work really hard at it , and Ubuntu wo n't do what I want and does n't even pretend to care ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mac is like a high maintenance mistress, Windows is like a pricey Girlfriend, Ubuntu is like a wife.So the Mac costs more but will do whatever I want, Windows might do what I want sometimes but I have to work really hard at it, and Ubuntu won't do what I want and doesn't even pretend to care?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255613280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are a few things that have improved, most of which were avalible in Vista too:</p><p>Much better use of multicore CPUs<br>GPU acceleration of the GUI<br>self healing system files(in some instances)<br>OS aware of SMART HD readings and able to prompt user<br>DLL seperation<br>vastly better RDP<br>vastly improved central managment and deployment features for businesses<br>Easy 64 bit usage with drivers<br>Faster installs<br>Better power managment and usage of hardware suspend<br>better usage of memory (cacheing for very noticible speed gains)<br>Media center!<br>transparent Bitlocker hard drive encryption (in pro and ultimate) with TPM<br>program execution isolation that redirects reg and file system calls to safe locations<br>epiclly better wireless support<br>support for propper GUI scaleing on high DPI LCDs<br>Integrated Touch support and Speech Recognition(not fantastic but alright)<br>Automatic driver retrival for most hardware right of Windows update without searching<br>Fast search and indexing<br>Document libraries for easy organisation<br>Faster boot times and UI responce on semi-decent hardware (compared to XP)<br>Better moniter support for HD TVs and multi moniters/GPUs (by default)<br>Child restricted accounts to limit games and allow usage limits for children.</p><p>Just to name a few, it has been a long time since XP and things have progressed.</p><p>On the cons side I still don't like the superbar much, you can change it to be simmilar to the Vista one quite easily though.  They have also removed the email client probably due to the EUs meddeling but live mail is still avalible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are a few things that have improved , most of which were avalible in Vista too : Much better use of multicore CPUsGPU acceleration of the GUIself healing system files ( in some instances ) OS aware of SMART HD readings and able to prompt userDLL seperationvastly better RDPvastly improved central managment and deployment features for businessesEasy 64 bit usage with driversFaster installsBetter power managment and usage of hardware suspendbetter usage of memory ( cacheing for very noticible speed gains ) Media center ! transparent Bitlocker hard drive encryption ( in pro and ultimate ) with TPMprogram execution isolation that redirects reg and file system calls to safe locationsepiclly better wireless supportsupport for propper GUI scaleing on high DPI LCDsIntegrated Touch support and Speech Recognition ( not fantastic but alright ) Automatic driver retrival for most hardware right of Windows update without searchingFast search and indexingDocument libraries for easy organisationFaster boot times and UI responce on semi-decent hardware ( compared to XP ) Better moniter support for HD TVs and multi moniters/GPUs ( by default ) Child restricted accounts to limit games and allow usage limits for children.Just to name a few , it has been a long time since XP and things have progressed.On the cons side I still do n't like the superbar much , you can change it to be simmilar to the Vista one quite easily though .
They have also removed the email client probably due to the EUs meddeling but live mail is still avalible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are a few things that have improved, most of which were avalible in Vista too:Much better use of multicore CPUsGPU acceleration of the GUIself healing system files(in some instances)OS aware of SMART HD readings and able to prompt userDLL seperationvastly better RDPvastly improved central managment and deployment features for businessesEasy 64 bit usage with driversFaster installsBetter power managment and usage of hardware suspendbetter usage of memory (cacheing for very noticible speed gains)Media center!transparent Bitlocker hard drive encryption (in pro and ultimate) with TPMprogram execution isolation that redirects reg and file system calls to safe locationsepiclly better wireless supportsupport for propper GUI scaleing on high DPI LCDsIntegrated Touch support and Speech Recognition(not fantastic but alright)Automatic driver retrival for most hardware right of Windows update without searchingFast search and indexingDocument libraries for easy organisationFaster boot times and UI responce on semi-decent hardware (compared to XP)Better moniter support for HD TVs and multi moniters/GPUs (by default)Child restricted accounts to limit games and allow usage limits for children.Just to name a few, it has been a long time since XP and things have progressed.On the cons side I still don't like the superbar much, you can change it to be simmilar to the Vista one quite easily though.
They have also removed the email client probably due to the EUs meddeling but live mail is still avalible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756947</id>
	<title>Re:Balance Sheet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255620000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Mac is like a high maintenance mistress, Windows is like a pricey Girlfriend, Ubuntu is like a wife.</p></div><p>if by "mac is like a high maintenance mistress" you really mean "a trophy wife", you're right on.<br>if by "windows is like a pricey gf" you really mean "spoiled 17yo brat", you're also right on.<br>and if by "ubuntu is like a wife" you really mean "nerdy but athletic girl", then you're also right on.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mac is like a high maintenance mistress , Windows is like a pricey Girlfriend , Ubuntu is like a wife.if by " mac is like a high maintenance mistress " you really mean " a trophy wife " , you 're right on.if by " windows is like a pricey gf " you really mean " spoiled 17yo brat " , you 're also right on.and if by " ubuntu is like a wife " you really mean " nerdy but athletic girl " , then you 're also right on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mac is like a high maintenance mistress, Windows is like a pricey Girlfriend, Ubuntu is like a wife.if by "mac is like a high maintenance mistress" you really mean "a trophy wife", you're right on.if by "windows is like a pricey gf" you really mean "spoiled 17yo brat", you're also right on.and if by "ubuntu is like a wife" you really mean "nerdy but athletic girl", then you're also right on.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759521</id>
	<title>recession?</title>
	<author>dAzED1</author>
	<datestamp>1255630920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Dell made plain several times that he sees the installed base of technology as very old, and sees a coming "refresh cycle," for which he has high hopes.</i></p><p>While the ultra-rich have been largely unaffected by the current economic situation, the people in the middle are being very badly hurt by it.  Guess who the overwhelming majority of people who would by a new computer simply because their older, still responsive and functional computer was merely "old" are?  That's right, the middle class.</p><p>He can have all the high hopes he wants, but people aren't going to be rushing to replace their 1-3year old computers this Christmas simply because Windows7 is going to be out.  While there are a lot of old computers out there, a lot of them are like the ones I have sitting in my closet right now; laptops from 5-7 years ago that I turn on and use for particular projects/tasks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dell made plain several times that he sees the installed base of technology as very old , and sees a coming " refresh cycle , " for which he has high hopes.While the ultra-rich have been largely unaffected by the current economic situation , the people in the middle are being very badly hurt by it .
Guess who the overwhelming majority of people who would by a new computer simply because their older , still responsive and functional computer was merely " old " are ?
That 's right , the middle class.He can have all the high hopes he wants , but people are n't going to be rushing to replace their 1-3year old computers this Christmas simply because Windows7 is going to be out .
While there are a lot of old computers out there , a lot of them are like the ones I have sitting in my closet right now ; laptops from 5-7 years ago that I turn on and use for particular projects/tasks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dell made plain several times that he sees the installed base of technology as very old, and sees a coming "refresh cycle," for which he has high hopes.While the ultra-rich have been largely unaffected by the current economic situation, the people in the middle are being very badly hurt by it.
Guess who the overwhelming majority of people who would by a new computer simply because their older, still responsive and functional computer was merely "old" are?
That's right, the middle class.He can have all the high hopes he wants, but people aren't going to be rushing to replace their 1-3year old computers this Christmas simply because Windows7 is going to be out.
While there are a lot of old computers out there, a lot of them are like the ones I have sitting in my closet right now; laptops from 5-7 years ago that I turn on and use for particular projects/tasks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759613</id>
	<title>Who cares?</title>
	<author>praxis22</author>
	<datestamp>1255631340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For the most part most people on slashdot are not the target audience, and most people who will ever touch Windows 7 will get it the same way they got XP, etc. with a new machine. Given the current economic environment, I doubt very many "consumers" will be part with hard earned cash for a PC they don't need at present.<br>
<br>
it will be interesting to see what the conversion stats are once we're beyond the initial release though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For the most part most people on slashdot are not the target audience , and most people who will ever touch Windows 7 will get it the same way they got XP , etc .
with a new machine .
Given the current economic environment , I doubt very many " consumers " will be part with hard earned cash for a PC they do n't need at present .
it will be interesting to see what the conversion stats are once we 're beyond the initial release though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the most part most people on slashdot are not the target audience, and most people who will ever touch Windows 7 will get it the same way they got XP, etc.
with a new machine.
Given the current economic environment, I doubt very many "consumers" will be part with hard earned cash for a PC they don't need at present.
it will be interesting to see what the conversion stats are once we're beyond the initial release though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756361</id>
	<title>Im off the upgrade threadmill.</title>
	<author>miffo.swe</author>
	<datestamp>1255617360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since i started using Linux full time the need to upgrade for each new version of the OS has disappeared. I do upgrade when a new fun game or applications comes out that can use the hardware but upgrading for the sake of the OS is just stupid. Movie editing made me buy a new computer for example.</p><p>Dell should be focusing in getting more applications out that drives upgrades, not an old servicepacked Vista with new shiny colours. Its as exciting as wet bread because once you scratch the surface of Windows 7 its all Vista behind the curtain.</p><p>Dell is hurting themselves in the long run by letting the OS take away all the processing power leaving nothing for the applications developers to use.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since i started using Linux full time the need to upgrade for each new version of the OS has disappeared .
I do upgrade when a new fun game or applications comes out that can use the hardware but upgrading for the sake of the OS is just stupid .
Movie editing made me buy a new computer for example.Dell should be focusing in getting more applications out that drives upgrades , not an old servicepacked Vista with new shiny colours .
Its as exciting as wet bread because once you scratch the surface of Windows 7 its all Vista behind the curtain.Dell is hurting themselves in the long run by letting the OS take away all the processing power leaving nothing for the applications developers to use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since i started using Linux full time the need to upgrade for each new version of the OS has disappeared.
I do upgrade when a new fun game or applications comes out that can use the hardware but upgrading for the sake of the OS is just stupid.
Movie editing made me buy a new computer for example.Dell should be focusing in getting more applications out that drives upgrades, not an old servicepacked Vista with new shiny colours.
Its as exciting as wet bread because once you scratch the surface of Windows 7 its all Vista behind the curtain.Dell is hurting themselves in the long run by letting the OS take away all the processing power leaving nothing for the applications developers to use.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757841</id>
	<title>"you will love your PC again"</title>
	<author>daffmeister</author>
	<datestamp>1255623600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Again?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Again?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756717</id>
	<title>Re:Tricky talk, in my opinion.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255619160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree, but would go further and say that Windows XP was the first Windows OS release candidate.</p><p>Prior to Win XP you had a painful mix of Windows NT/2000/95/98, all with different levels of reliability, integration issues and hardware support. Migrating to Windows XP had tangable benefits as it solved a lot of IT headaches, regardless of Microsofts spin machine.</p><p>The world has changed, Apple is no longer a niece product, and FOSS (desktops/hardware support/applications) have made a huge leap forward. Choices that did not exist Pre XP.</p><p>So if I'm forced to do a radical upgrade of my working desktop OS infrastructure, then its a good time to sit down and take a long hard look at the alternatives. That is the last thing Microsoft wants and will only help Apple &amp; FOSS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , but would go further and say that Windows XP was the first Windows OS release candidate.Prior to Win XP you had a painful mix of Windows NT/2000/95/98 , all with different levels of reliability , integration issues and hardware support .
Migrating to Windows XP had tangable benefits as it solved a lot of IT headaches , regardless of Microsofts spin machine.The world has changed , Apple is no longer a niece product , and FOSS ( desktops/hardware support/applications ) have made a huge leap forward .
Choices that did not exist Pre XP.So if I 'm forced to do a radical upgrade of my working desktop OS infrastructure , then its a good time to sit down and take a long hard look at the alternatives .
That is the last thing Microsoft wants and will only help Apple &amp; FOSS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, but would go further and say that Windows XP was the first Windows OS release candidate.Prior to Win XP you had a painful mix of Windows NT/2000/95/98, all with different levels of reliability, integration issues and hardware support.
Migrating to Windows XP had tangable benefits as it solved a lot of IT headaches, regardless of Microsofts spin machine.The world has changed, Apple is no longer a niece product, and FOSS (desktops/hardware support/applications) have made a huge leap forward.
Choices that did not exist Pre XP.So if I'm forced to do a radical upgrade of my working desktop OS infrastructure, then its a good time to sit down and take a long hard look at the alternatives.
That is the last thing Microsoft wants and will only help Apple &amp; FOSS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758157</id>
	<title>Re:Not going to happen</title>
	<author>onefriedrice</author>
	<datestamp>1255624920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's a business case when XP stops getting security updates.  And let's face it, if the CEO wants that big task bar, he's gonna <i>get</i> that big task bar.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a business case when XP stops getting security updates .
And let 's face it , if the CEO wants that big task bar , he 's gon na get that big task bar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a business case when XP stops getting security updates.
And let's face it, if the CEO wants that big task bar, he's gonna get that big task bar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759129</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255629180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please tell me which of those features have been in Mac OS X for "Years". The vast majority of them STILL don't exist in OS X. Off the top of my head:<br>- Multimonitor support is terrible<br>- 64-bit? With drivers? You're kidding, right?<br>- Games? Child restricted accounts? Nope.<br>- Program Execution isolation<br>- Transparent Bitlocker<br>- Central management and deployment for businesses<br>-And on and on.</p><p>Your comment, which amazingly was scored "Insightful", is complete and utter misinformation and lies. Sorry, please troll harder.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please tell me which of those features have been in Mac OS X for " Years " .
The vast majority of them STILL do n't exist in OS X. Off the top of my head : - Multimonitor support is terrible- 64-bit ?
With drivers ?
You 're kidding , right ? - Games ?
Child restricted accounts ?
Nope.- Program Execution isolation- Transparent Bitlocker- Central management and deployment for businesses-And on and on.Your comment , which amazingly was scored " Insightful " , is complete and utter misinformation and lies .
Sorry , please troll harder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please tell me which of those features have been in Mac OS X for "Years".
The vast majority of them STILL don't exist in OS X. Off the top of my head:- Multimonitor support is terrible- 64-bit?
With drivers?
You're kidding, right?- Games?
Child restricted accounts?
Nope.- Program Execution isolation- Transparent Bitlocker- Central management and deployment for businesses-And on and on.Your comment, which amazingly was scored "Insightful", is complete and utter misinformation and lies.
Sorry, please troll harder.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756297</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758633</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Zuato</author>
	<datestamp>1255626960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Meh, I'm running 7 Ultimate (technet license - full version, not the release candidates) on a Dell Latitude E6400 and I'd like to say that so far, RDP is NOT better. It hangs on closing to the point of needing a system reboot. I had better RDP in Ubuntu 9.04, Vista, and XP than this. Sometimes a reboot helps, but lately it has been pretty consistent in the hang on logging out of an RDP session.</p><p>Office 2007 (outlook) hangs on certain emails (one from the local Apple store, go figure), and hung on printing an email from a vendor. If I load up my XP VM (for my phone system admin software) Outlook 2007 works fine on the email and printing.</p><p>Power management certainly is not better than Ubuntu. I had longer life on a charge from Ubuntu than I get now with 7 - this is with unmodified settings in either OS.</p><p>Boot up was generally faster than Vista and XP, but is starting to slow down. Overall time to desktop is definitely better, but with age it is starting to slow down like previous versions of Windows have.</p><p>Shut down is another story...sometimes it hangs and I have to hold the power button down to get the laptop to shut down. Other times it seems to take an eternity but does shut down properly on its own.</p><p>All drivers are up to date, all updates from Microsoft have been applied, and I am running the Microsoft Security Essentials to see how well it works (so far it seems ok, but haven't really tried to purposely infect the machine).</p><p>Overall my impression of it is an updated version of Vista. There are some nice features added to it, but at this point from my experiences I'd say hold off a bit and wait for some updates to come along for both the OS and the hardware drivers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Meh , I 'm running 7 Ultimate ( technet license - full version , not the release candidates ) on a Dell Latitude E6400 and I 'd like to say that so far , RDP is NOT better .
It hangs on closing to the point of needing a system reboot .
I had better RDP in Ubuntu 9.04 , Vista , and XP than this .
Sometimes a reboot helps , but lately it has been pretty consistent in the hang on logging out of an RDP session.Office 2007 ( outlook ) hangs on certain emails ( one from the local Apple store , go figure ) , and hung on printing an email from a vendor .
If I load up my XP VM ( for my phone system admin software ) Outlook 2007 works fine on the email and printing.Power management certainly is not better than Ubuntu .
I had longer life on a charge from Ubuntu than I get now with 7 - this is with unmodified settings in either OS.Boot up was generally faster than Vista and XP , but is starting to slow down .
Overall time to desktop is definitely better , but with age it is starting to slow down like previous versions of Windows have.Shut down is another story...sometimes it hangs and I have to hold the power button down to get the laptop to shut down .
Other times it seems to take an eternity but does shut down properly on its own.All drivers are up to date , all updates from Microsoft have been applied , and I am running the Microsoft Security Essentials to see how well it works ( so far it seems ok , but have n't really tried to purposely infect the machine ) .Overall my impression of it is an updated version of Vista .
There are some nice features added to it , but at this point from my experiences I 'd say hold off a bit and wait for some updates to come along for both the OS and the hardware drivers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meh, I'm running 7 Ultimate (technet license - full version, not the release candidates) on a Dell Latitude E6400 and I'd like to say that so far, RDP is NOT better.
It hangs on closing to the point of needing a system reboot.
I had better RDP in Ubuntu 9.04, Vista, and XP than this.
Sometimes a reboot helps, but lately it has been pretty consistent in the hang on logging out of an RDP session.Office 2007 (outlook) hangs on certain emails (one from the local Apple store, go figure), and hung on printing an email from a vendor.
If I load up my XP VM (for my phone system admin software) Outlook 2007 works fine on the email and printing.Power management certainly is not better than Ubuntu.
I had longer life on a charge from Ubuntu than I get now with 7 - this is with unmodified settings in either OS.Boot up was generally faster than Vista and XP, but is starting to slow down.
Overall time to desktop is definitely better, but with age it is starting to slow down like previous versions of Windows have.Shut down is another story...sometimes it hangs and I have to hold the power button down to get the laptop to shut down.
Other times it seems to take an eternity but does shut down properly on its own.All drivers are up to date, all updates from Microsoft have been applied, and I am running the Microsoft Security Essentials to see how well it works (so far it seems ok, but haven't really tried to purposely infect the machine).Overall my impression of it is an updated version of Vista.
There are some nice features added to it, but at this point from my experiences I'd say hold off a bit and wait for some updates to come along for both the OS and the hardware drivers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757695</id>
	<title>Re:Balance Sheet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255623000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um, how are you insightful? Care to explain how a Mac is "high maintenance?"</p><p>And Ubuntu 'like a wife'? You're obviously biased.</p><p>What a silly analogy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , how are you insightful ?
Care to explain how a Mac is " high maintenance ?
" And Ubuntu 'like a wife ' ?
You 're obviously biased.What a silly analogy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, how are you insightful?
Care to explain how a Mac is "high maintenance?
"And Ubuntu 'like a wife'?
You're obviously biased.What a silly analogy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757955</id>
	<title>Pfffft.  Did anybody already say...</title>
	<author>Phaldyn</author>
	<datestamp>1255624020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dell sucks?<br>
<br>
I can't help but agree with the comment above dating XP at 2004 (w/SP2, when it finally became the relatively stable platform we know today), and everyone rapping M. Dell for simply marketeering... but furthermore, I have had<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/problems/ with the Dell we received as a gift (no, I would not have bought one myself, I would have assembled something better for the money)... memory going bad, not enough power coming from the power supply to support the components factory-installed, having to endure a totally "behind the scenes" re-rooting of Windows on reinstall which makes sound drivers a nightmare to set up properly.  When I was in college and had days at a time to hack on a driver problem, that was fine, but I work full time now -- I'd like my PC to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/work/.<br>
<br>
In spite of all these difficulties, I already "love" my PC... all that Word 97 goodness was all I ever really needed in terms of wordprocessing power and the changes that came with Office 2003 were essentially polish.  Does anyone else out there love the fact that Office 97 apps come up in about 0.25 seconds even on a P4?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dell sucks ?
I ca n't help but agree with the comment above dating XP at 2004 ( w/SP2 , when it finally became the relatively stable platform we know today ) , and everyone rapping M. Dell for simply marketeering... but furthermore , I have had /problems/ with the Dell we received as a gift ( no , I would not have bought one myself , I would have assembled something better for the money ) ... memory going bad , not enough power coming from the power supply to support the components factory-installed , having to endure a totally " behind the scenes " re-rooting of Windows on reinstall which makes sound drivers a nightmare to set up properly .
When I was in college and had days at a time to hack on a driver problem , that was fine , but I work full time now -- I 'd like my PC to /work/ .
In spite of all these difficulties , I already " love " my PC... all that Word 97 goodness was all I ever really needed in terms of wordprocessing power and the changes that came with Office 2003 were essentially polish .
Does anyone else out there love the fact that Office 97 apps come up in about 0.25 seconds even on a P4 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dell sucks?
I can't help but agree with the comment above dating XP at 2004 (w/SP2, when it finally became the relatively stable platform we know today), and everyone rapping M. Dell for simply marketeering... but furthermore, I have had /problems/ with the Dell we received as a gift (no, I would not have bought one myself, I would have assembled something better for the money)... memory going bad, not enough power coming from the power supply to support the components factory-installed, having to endure a totally "behind the scenes" re-rooting of Windows on reinstall which makes sound drivers a nightmare to set up properly.
When I was in college and had days at a time to hack on a driver problem, that was fine, but I work full time now -- I'd like my PC to /work/.
In spite of all these difficulties, I already "love" my PC... all that Word 97 goodness was all I ever really needed in terms of wordprocessing power and the changes that came with Office 2003 were essentially polish.
Does anyone else out there love the fact that Office 97 apps come up in about 0.25 seconds even on a P4?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</id>
	<title>Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>gravyface</author>
	<datestamp>1255611840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. geek, what does Windows 7 have that's *really* useful/desired/cool vs. Windows XP?  Not trolling, just haven't had the time to install it/play with it yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For a / .
geek , what does Windows 7 have that 's * really * useful/desired/cool vs. Windows XP ?
Not trolling , just have n't had the time to install it/play with it yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a /.
geek, what does Windows 7 have that's *really* useful/desired/cool vs. Windows XP?
Not trolling, just haven't had the time to install it/play with it yet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756633</id>
	<title>teledildonics</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1255618800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is the only thing that will make me "love" pcs</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is the only thing that will make me " love " pcs</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is the only thing that will make me "love" pcs</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757725</id>
	<title>i will try a pirated copy</title>
	<author>FudRucker</author>
	<datestamp>1255623120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>or some free copy because i sure as hell am not going to spend money on it if i decide i dont like and/or dont want it, better consider that, do <i>YOU</i> want to spend a large sum of folding money on an OS that you might not even like and end up being just another ignored CDrom on a bookshelf gathering dust?
<br> <br>
Linux is still FREE!</htmltext>
<tokenext>or some free copy because i sure as hell am not going to spend money on it if i decide i dont like and/or dont want it , better consider that , do YOU want to spend a large sum of folding money on an OS that you might not even like and end up being just another ignored CDrom on a bookshelf gathering dust ?
Linux is still FREE !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or some free copy because i sure as hell am not going to spend money on it if i decide i dont like and/or dont want it, better consider that, do YOU want to spend a large sum of folding money on an OS that you might not even like and end up being just another ignored CDrom on a bookshelf gathering dust?
Linux is still FREE!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755593</id>
	<title>Well...I agree with him.</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1255613400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After installing Windows 7 (started using it at RC level, I think), everything just feels smooth. It actually made me want to use Microsoft's included products for everything. It definitely has more appeal to me than OS X now.</p><p><b>Disclaimer:</b> I am not affiliated in any way to Microsoft or its subsidiaries. I just really like Windows 7.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After installing Windows 7 ( started using it at RC level , I think ) , everything just feels smooth .
It actually made me want to use Microsoft 's included products for everything .
It definitely has more appeal to me than OS X now.Disclaimer : I am not affiliated in any way to Microsoft or its subsidiaries .
I just really like Windows 7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After installing Windows 7 (started using it at RC level, I think), everything just feels smooth.
It actually made me want to use Microsoft's included products for everything.
It definitely has more appeal to me than OS X now.Disclaimer: I am not affiliated in any way to Microsoft or its subsidiaries.
I just really like Windows 7.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29762973</id>
	<title>Prove Michael Dell wrong</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1255603140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. Buy a <a href="http://www.dell.com/content/topics/segtopic.aspx/linux\_3x?c=us&amp;l=en&amp;cs=19" title="dell.com">Dell machine with Ubuntu pre-installed</a> [dell.com]<br>2. Love it.<br>3. Profit. (Well, not for Microsoft, anyway.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Buy a Dell machine with Ubuntu pre-installed [ dell.com ] 2 .
Love it.3 .
Profit. ( Well , not for Microsoft , anyway .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Buy a Dell machine with Ubuntu pre-installed [dell.com]2.
Love it.3.
Profit. (Well, not for Microsoft, anyway.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755713</id>
	<title>7 &amp; Dell</title>
	<author>p51d007</author>
	<datestamp>1255614240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I put 7 beta on my Dell E1505 laptop when it came out.
Problems ZERO
I wiped it, put RC1 on the same laptop when it came out.
Problems ZERO
I put the release version on the same laptop about a month ago
Problems ZERO. (I'll be at the store on Oct 22 to buy it).
XP, when I installed it, had issues that were not resolved with bluetooth and wi-fi until SP1)
XP, I loved you, but, it is time to give you up.
Win7 installed, found 100\% of my hardware and has had absolutely NO problems.
I just built a new home computer, to replace my 6 year old P4 HT processor.
The new box is a Intel Quad core 2.66ghz, 4 gig ram, 500GB hard drive &amp; an Nvidia 9800GT
video card.  Win7 found 100\% of everything and set it all up perfectly.  After I got everything
set up, installed AV etc, the first time I connected it to the net, it found "updated driver" for
the chipset, sound &amp; video card, installed them all perfectly.  The only mod I made was to
install the new Nvidia video card driver.  It even found my Hauppage TV tuner and set it up
PERFECTLY.
Win7 is a BIG improvement over XP.  XP was a BIG improvement over windows 3.11</htmltext>
<tokenext>I put 7 beta on my Dell E1505 laptop when it came out .
Problems ZERO I wiped it , put RC1 on the same laptop when it came out .
Problems ZERO I put the release version on the same laptop about a month ago Problems ZERO .
( I 'll be at the store on Oct 22 to buy it ) .
XP , when I installed it , had issues that were not resolved with bluetooth and wi-fi until SP1 ) XP , I loved you , but , it is time to give you up .
Win7 installed , found 100 \ % of my hardware and has had absolutely NO problems .
I just built a new home computer , to replace my 6 year old P4 HT processor .
The new box is a Intel Quad core 2.66ghz , 4 gig ram , 500GB hard drive &amp; an Nvidia 9800GT video card .
Win7 found 100 \ % of everything and set it all up perfectly .
After I got everything set up , installed AV etc , the first time I connected it to the net , it found " updated driver " for the chipset , sound &amp; video card , installed them all perfectly .
The only mod I made was to install the new Nvidia video card driver .
It even found my Hauppage TV tuner and set it up PERFECTLY .
Win7 is a BIG improvement over XP .
XP was a BIG improvement over windows 3.11</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I put 7 beta on my Dell E1505 laptop when it came out.
Problems ZERO
I wiped it, put RC1 on the same laptop when it came out.
Problems ZERO
I put the release version on the same laptop about a month ago
Problems ZERO.
(I'll be at the store on Oct 22 to buy it).
XP, when I installed it, had issues that were not resolved with bluetooth and wi-fi until SP1)
XP, I loved you, but, it is time to give you up.
Win7 installed, found 100\% of my hardware and has had absolutely NO problems.
I just built a new home computer, to replace my 6 year old P4 HT processor.
The new box is a Intel Quad core 2.66ghz, 4 gig ram, 500GB hard drive &amp; an Nvidia 9800GT
video card.
Win7 found 100\% of everything and set it all up perfectly.
After I got everything
set up, installed AV etc, the first time I connected it to the net, it found "updated driver" for
the chipset, sound &amp; video card, installed them all perfectly.
The only mod I made was to
install the new Nvidia video card driver.
It even found my Hauppage TV tuner and set it up
PERFECTLY.
Win7 is a BIG improvement over XP.
XP was a BIG improvement over windows 3.11</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759325</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1255630080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ANd? the question was comparing it to XP, not eery other freaking OS.</p><p>way back in 1998? wow. Nearly all that ghas been done in mainframes years earlier.</p><p>If tyou buy a computer based on processer scheduling and memory management you should own a mainframe.</p><p>"I can do at least as well as Windows for no money and way better for $129."<br>Play TF2 on it. Run MS Office on it, and so on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ANd ?
the question was comparing it to XP , not eery other freaking OS.way back in 1998 ?
wow. Nearly all that ghas been done in mainframes years earlier.If tyou buy a computer based on processer scheduling and memory management you should own a mainframe .
" I can do at least as well as Windows for no money and way better for $ 129 .
" Play TF2 on it .
Run MS Office on it , and so on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ANd?
the question was comparing it to XP, not eery other freaking OS.way back in 1998?
wow. Nearly all that ghas been done in mainframes years earlier.If tyou buy a computer based on processer scheduling and memory management you should own a mainframe.
"I can do at least as well as Windows for no money and way better for $129.
"Play TF2 on it.
Run MS Office on it, and so on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756297</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756055</id>
	<title>So... people will buy hardware they don't need...</title>
	<author>Steinar</author>
	<datestamp>1255616100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Essensially he is saying that Windows 7 will force lots of consumers (and companies) to upgrade. Which is good for him. But this is not love. (Buying "love" is otherwise called prostitution.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Essensially he is saying that Windows 7 will force lots of consumers ( and companies ) to upgrade .
Which is good for him .
But this is not love .
( Buying " love " is otherwise called prostitution .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Essensially he is saying that Windows 7 will force lots of consumers (and companies) to upgrade.
Which is good for him.
But this is not love.
(Buying "love" is otherwise called prostitution.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757893</id>
	<title>Bad news, everyone...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255623780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What a bunch of hype.</p><p>Your average Pentium-4-class Office PC running XP is <i>all the average office worker will need for years</i>.  There is no compelling reason to upgrade either the software or the hardware simply because it was bought 4 or 5 years ago, and running an 8-year-old operating system that went through 3 service packs in the interim is no issue.  Upgrade the RAM, blow the dust out of it, and wipe the system with a fresh disk image is about all such a machine really needs for a "refresh".  Regular office workers don't need Nehalem-class CPUs or Windows 7 in order to run Word and Excel.  Oh, and here' s one word that also makes it a big waste of time and money: retraining.</p><p>If office workers were re-encoding video or playing games, maybe it would be justified, but that's more a case for refreshing home machines than work machines.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What a bunch of hype.Your average Pentium-4-class Office PC running XP is all the average office worker will need for years .
There is no compelling reason to upgrade either the software or the hardware simply because it was bought 4 or 5 years ago , and running an 8-year-old operating system that went through 3 service packs in the interim is no issue .
Upgrade the RAM , blow the dust out of it , and wipe the system with a fresh disk image is about all such a machine really needs for a " refresh " .
Regular office workers do n't need Nehalem-class CPUs or Windows 7 in order to run Word and Excel .
Oh , and here ' s one word that also makes it a big waste of time and money : retraining.If office workers were re-encoding video or playing games , maybe it would be justified , but that 's more a case for refreshing home machines than work machines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a bunch of hype.Your average Pentium-4-class Office PC running XP is all the average office worker will need for years.
There is no compelling reason to upgrade either the software or the hardware simply because it was bought 4 or 5 years ago, and running an 8-year-old operating system that went through 3 service packs in the interim is no issue.
Upgrade the RAM, blow the dust out of it, and wipe the system with a fresh disk image is about all such a machine really needs for a "refresh".
Regular office workers don't need Nehalem-class CPUs or Windows 7 in order to run Word and Excel.
Oh, and here' s one word that also makes it a big waste of time and money: retraining.If office workers were re-encoding video or playing games, maybe it would be justified, but that's more a case for refreshing home machines than work machines.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756079</id>
	<title>Re:Balance Sheet</title>
	<author>Rhaban</author>
	<datestamp>1255616220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Mac is like a high maintenance mistress, Windows is like a pricey Girlfriend, Ubuntu is like a wife.</p></div><p>The question is, which one will get me laid?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mac is like a high maintenance mistress , Windows is like a pricey Girlfriend , Ubuntu is like a wife.The question is , which one will get me laid ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mac is like a high maintenance mistress, Windows is like a pricey Girlfriend, Ubuntu is like a wife.The question is, which one will get me laid?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759335</id>
	<title>Love my PC?</title>
	<author>FrozenFOXX</author>
	<datestamp>1255630080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I already love my PCs, all of them, and they're all running Linux of various flavors, devices, and duties (and two of them are dual-booting the Win7 RC...*may* go buy a full copy when it comes out, depends on how much use it gets which currently isn't much).  Right about every person I've ever put Linux on a system for says the same thing, if they ever switch back it's because of some necessity (like certain software for truckers for instance).<br> <br>

I don't want to have to "love my PC," I want my PC to love me <i>back</i>.  Every time I use Linux (and remotely, sometimes, when I use a Mac) I get an experience that I am not fighting with it, that it wants to work <i>with</i> me and help me do whatever it was that I wanted to do.  Every and I mean EVERY single time I use Windows I get the impression it's a system that doesn't like me, doesn't want me to touch it, and I had best follow its rules or else it will make my life absolute hell.<br> <br>

I understand Dell wanting to sell systems since after all that's what they do but seriously that kind of message is not helping.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I already love my PCs , all of them , and they 're all running Linux of various flavors , devices , and duties ( and two of them are dual-booting the Win7 RC... * may * go buy a full copy when it comes out , depends on how much use it gets which currently is n't much ) .
Right about every person I 've ever put Linux on a system for says the same thing , if they ever switch back it 's because of some necessity ( like certain software for truckers for instance ) .
I do n't want to have to " love my PC , " I want my PC to love me back .
Every time I use Linux ( and remotely , sometimes , when I use a Mac ) I get an experience that I am not fighting with it , that it wants to work with me and help me do whatever it was that I wanted to do .
Every and I mean EVERY single time I use Windows I get the impression it 's a system that does n't like me , does n't want me to touch it , and I had best follow its rules or else it will make my life absolute hell .
I understand Dell wanting to sell systems since after all that 's what they do but seriously that kind of message is not helping .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I already love my PCs, all of them, and they're all running Linux of various flavors, devices, and duties (and two of them are dual-booting the Win7 RC...*may* go buy a full copy when it comes out, depends on how much use it gets which currently isn't much).
Right about every person I've ever put Linux on a system for says the same thing, if they ever switch back it's because of some necessity (like certain software for truckers for instance).
I don't want to have to "love my PC," I want my PC to love me back.
Every time I use Linux (and remotely, sometimes, when I use a Mac) I get an experience that I am not fighting with it, that it wants to work with me and help me do whatever it was that I wanted to do.
Every and I mean EVERY single time I use Windows I get the impression it's a system that doesn't like me, doesn't want me to touch it, and I had best follow its rules or else it will make my life absolute hell.
I understand Dell wanting to sell systems since after all that's what they do but seriously that kind of message is not helping.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759675</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255631580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>self healing system files(in some instances)</p></div><p>I HATE self healing system files.  If i want to delete something windows argues with me about it being needed.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Faster installs</p></div><p>Yeah.  thats a good reason to buy a new windows.  YOU CAN REINSTALL FASTER!</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Better power managment and usage of hardware suspend</p></div><p>We've had this since NT. If you bothered to configure it properly in bios and in windows.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>better usage of memory (cacheing for very noticible speed gains)</p></div><p>We've always had this.  Just the defaults windows use were always stupid.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Media center!</p></div><p>I don't want microsoft touching any of my media. VLC does the job perfectly and doesnt take over anything i didnt tell it to.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>transparent Bitlocker hard drive encryption (in pro and ultimate) with TPM</p></div><p>Not that useful.  But i guess pretend security is better than no security.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>epiclly better wireless support</p></div><p>What? what support.  its a connection.  wireless has been working just fine since windows 2k for me. i cant imagine wanting it to do anything other than connect.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Integrated Touch support and Speech Recognition(not fantastic but alright)<br>Automatic driver retrival for most hardware right of Windows update without searching<br>Fast search and indexing<br>Document libraries for easy organisation</p></div><p>You smoked some marketing crack didnt you.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Faster boot times and UI responce on semi-decent hardware (compared to XP)</p></div><p>Bullshit.  Flat out bullshit.   I can't get windows 7 or vista to boot anywhere near as quick as xp.  The ammount of required crap is so much greater in vista and up. it can never get lower than xp.  and 2k blew them all away anyway.</p><p>IMHO..  vista or 7 are MARGINAL upgrades.  minor revisions. there's nothing there you really NEED.  and nothing most people will ever WANT.  It's nothing new and spectactular.  Its a minor upgrade for a major fucking price.</p><p>And no matter how much you spin it.  Theres just not any real reason to switch from xp.  (yet)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>self healing system files ( in some instances ) I HATE self healing system files .
If i want to delete something windows argues with me about it being needed.Faster installsYeah .
thats a good reason to buy a new windows .
YOU CAN REINSTALL FASTER ! Better power managment and usage of hardware suspendWe 've had this since NT .
If you bothered to configure it properly in bios and in windows.better usage of memory ( cacheing for very noticible speed gains ) We 've always had this .
Just the defaults windows use were always stupid.Media center ! I do n't want microsoft touching any of my media .
VLC does the job perfectly and doesnt take over anything i didnt tell it to.transparent Bitlocker hard drive encryption ( in pro and ultimate ) with TPMNot that useful .
But i guess pretend security is better than no security.epiclly better wireless supportWhat ?
what support .
its a connection .
wireless has been working just fine since windows 2k for me .
i cant imagine wanting it to do anything other than connect.Integrated Touch support and Speech Recognition ( not fantastic but alright ) Automatic driver retrival for most hardware right of Windows update without searchingFast search and indexingDocument libraries for easy organisationYou smoked some marketing crack didnt you.Faster boot times and UI responce on semi-decent hardware ( compared to XP ) Bullshit .
Flat out bullshit .
I ca n't get windows 7 or vista to boot anywhere near as quick as xp .
The ammount of required crap is so much greater in vista and up .
it can never get lower than xp .
and 2k blew them all away anyway.IMHO.. vista or 7 are MARGINAL upgrades .
minor revisions .
there 's nothing there you really NEED .
and nothing most people will ever WANT .
It 's nothing new and spectactular .
Its a minor upgrade for a major fucking price.And no matter how much you spin it .
Theres just not any real reason to switch from xp .
( yet )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>self healing system files(in some instances)I HATE self healing system files.
If i want to delete something windows argues with me about it being needed.Faster installsYeah.
thats a good reason to buy a new windows.
YOU CAN REINSTALL FASTER!Better power managment and usage of hardware suspendWe've had this since NT.
If you bothered to configure it properly in bios and in windows.better usage of memory (cacheing for very noticible speed gains)We've always had this.
Just the defaults windows use were always stupid.Media center!I don't want microsoft touching any of my media.
VLC does the job perfectly and doesnt take over anything i didnt tell it to.transparent Bitlocker hard drive encryption (in pro and ultimate) with TPMNot that useful.
But i guess pretend security is better than no security.epiclly better wireless supportWhat?
what support.
its a connection.
wireless has been working just fine since windows 2k for me.
i cant imagine wanting it to do anything other than connect.Integrated Touch support and Speech Recognition(not fantastic but alright)Automatic driver retrival for most hardware right of Windows update without searchingFast search and indexingDocument libraries for easy organisationYou smoked some marketing crack didnt you.Faster boot times and UI responce on semi-decent hardware (compared to XP)Bullshit.
Flat out bullshit.
I can't get windows 7 or vista to boot anywhere near as quick as xp.
The ammount of required crap is so much greater in vista and up.
it can never get lower than xp.
and 2k blew them all away anyway.IMHO..  vista or 7 are MARGINAL upgrades.
minor revisions.
there's nothing there you really NEED.
and nothing most people will ever WANT.
It's nothing new and spectactular.
Its a minor upgrade for a major fucking price.And no matter how much you spin it.
Theres just not any real reason to switch from xp.
(yet)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755999</id>
	<title>What woudl be news for nerds</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255615860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If Michael Dell said that Windows 7 would cause you to hate your computer.  This is not news, it's propaganda.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Michael Dell said that Windows 7 would cause you to hate your computer .
This is not news , it 's propaganda .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Michael Dell said that Windows 7 would cause you to hate your computer.
This is not news, it's propaganda.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755915</id>
	<title>I already love my PC</title>
	<author>Skapare</author>
	<datestamp>1255615320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... which runs Slackware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... which runs Slackware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... which runs Slackware.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29762157</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>jim\_v2000</author>
	<datestamp>1255600200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In Linux?  Are you joking?
<br> <br>
GPU acceleration of the GUI - buggy as hell <br> <br>
self healing system files(in some instances) - no <br> <br>
DLL seperation - not quite <br> <br>
vastly better RDP - VNC sucks balls compared to RDP <br> <br>
Easy 64 bit usage with drivers - ha ha, no <br> <br>
Media center! - WMC is quicker and easier to setup/use than anything I've seen for Linux <br> <br>
epiclly better wireless support - If you can get your wireless working in Linux, NetworkManager still blows compared to wireless in Windows 7<br> <br>
support for propper GUI scaleing on high DPI LCDs - no <br> <br>
Integrated Touch support and Speech Recognition(not fantastic but alright) - no<br> <br>
Automatic driver retrival for most hardware right of Windows update without searching - if you're lucky, but most often no<br> <br>
Document libraries for easy organisation - no<br> <br>
Better moniter support for HD TVs and multi moniters/GPUs (by default) - no - multiple monitors are a hassle in Linux <br> <br>
Child restricted accounts to limit games and allow usage limits for children. - not without much configuring</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Linux ?
Are you joking ?
GPU acceleration of the GUI - buggy as hell self healing system files ( in some instances ) - no DLL seperation - not quite vastly better RDP - VNC sucks balls compared to RDP Easy 64 bit usage with drivers - ha ha , no Media center !
- WMC is quicker and easier to setup/use than anything I 've seen for Linux epiclly better wireless support - If you can get your wireless working in Linux , NetworkManager still blows compared to wireless in Windows 7 support for propper GUI scaleing on high DPI LCDs - no Integrated Touch support and Speech Recognition ( not fantastic but alright ) - no Automatic driver retrival for most hardware right of Windows update without searching - if you 're lucky , but most often no Document libraries for easy organisation - no Better moniter support for HD TVs and multi moniters/GPUs ( by default ) - no - multiple monitors are a hassle in Linux Child restricted accounts to limit games and allow usage limits for children .
- not without much configuring</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Linux?
Are you joking?
GPU acceleration of the GUI - buggy as hell  
self healing system files(in some instances) - no  
DLL seperation - not quite  
vastly better RDP - VNC sucks balls compared to RDP  
Easy 64 bit usage with drivers - ha ha, no  
Media center!
- WMC is quicker and easier to setup/use than anything I've seen for Linux  
epiclly better wireless support - If you can get your wireless working in Linux, NetworkManager still blows compared to wireless in Windows 7 
support for propper GUI scaleing on high DPI LCDs - no  
Integrated Touch support and Speech Recognition(not fantastic but alright) - no 
Automatic driver retrival for most hardware right of Windows update without searching - if you're lucky, but most often no 
Document libraries for easy organisation - no 
Better moniter support for HD TVs and multi moniters/GPUs (by default) - no - multiple monitors are a hassle in Linux  
Child restricted accounts to limit games and allow usage limits for children.
- not without much configuring</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756297</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756261</id>
	<title>Windows 7 Will Make You Love PCs</title>
	<author>Zarf</author>
	<datestamp>1255616940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I *knew* it. They're using mind-viruses now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I * knew * it .
They 're using mind-viruses now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I *knew* it.
They're using mind-viruses now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756297</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>schmidt349</author>
	<datestamp>1255617120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nearly all of these "features" have been in both Linux and Mac OS X for years. Hell, intelligent processor scheduling was in <i>BeOS</i> way back in 1998. So you're going to start using Windows 7 because Microsoft is finally catching up on basic OS engineering? If they want to get $200 out of me they're going to need to try way harder. I can do at least as well as Windows for no money and way better for $129.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nearly all of these " features " have been in both Linux and Mac OS X for years .
Hell , intelligent processor scheduling was in BeOS way back in 1998 .
So you 're going to start using Windows 7 because Microsoft is finally catching up on basic OS engineering ?
If they want to get $ 200 out of me they 're going to need to try way harder .
I can do at least as well as Windows for no money and way better for $ 129 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nearly all of these "features" have been in both Linux and Mac OS X for years.
Hell, intelligent processor scheduling was in BeOS way back in 1998.
So you're going to start using Windows 7 because Microsoft is finally catching up on basic OS engineering?
If they want to get $200 out of me they're going to need to try way harder.
I can do at least as well as Windows for no money and way better for $129.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756771</id>
	<title>Re:Balance Sheet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255619340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How it is high-maintenance?  My Mac requires significantly less maintenance (both hardware and software) than any other computer I've used/owned - and that's dating back to the Commodore-64.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How it is high-maintenance ?
My Mac requires significantly less maintenance ( both hardware and software ) than any other computer I 've used/owned - and that 's dating back to the Commodore-64 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How it is high-maintenance?
My Mac requires significantly less maintenance (both hardware and software) than any other computer I've used/owned - and that's dating back to the Commodore-64.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29760903</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255637100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Nearly all of these "features" have been in both Linux and Mac OS X for years.</p><p>So it has been years since linux is ready for desktop? Oh... never mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Nearly all of these " features " have been in both Linux and Mac OS X for years.So it has been years since linux is ready for desktop ?
Oh... never mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Nearly all of these "features" have been in both Linux and Mac OS X for years.So it has been years since linux is ready for desktop?
Oh... never mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756297</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755755</id>
	<title>Doing it wrong</title>
	<author>BumpyCarrot</author>
	<datestamp>1255614420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think I've ever wanted Windows less having read that.

<br> <br>"Dell has always been a strong MS OEM ally and it is now hoping to cash in again from the impending upgrades." Wow, so we can expect a unbiased opinion then? PREPARE FOR SHPIEL!

<br> <br>"Dell made plain several times that he sees the installed base of technology as very old" which is to say, people are not fond of buying Vista packages "and sees a coming "refresh cycle," for which he has high hopes" and that Dell is planning on making plenty of money off this, after Vista's disappointment.

<br> <br>"The latest generation of chips from Intel is strong, particularly Nehalem," So technology advances then, yes?  Took some long-term observation of the industry to determine that factoid, I'll bet.

<br> <br>"I've been using Windows 7 for a long time now, and if you get the latest processor technology and Office 2010 with it, you will love your PC again." So you buy Windows, but you'll need a new computer (let's face it, the majority do not know what a CPU is) and hey, whilst you're there, why not buy a new version of Office for the giggles? "It's a dramatic improvement"

<br> <br>Improvement over <b>what</b>?  Being able to carry out tasks 95\% of which we did 8 years ago on hardware with perhaps, oooh, 50\% of the capacity of modern tech?

<br> <br>You'll have to excuse me if I'm not enticed into reading the article after that.  I've had quite enough of reading about tech. going backwards.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think I 've ever wanted Windows less having read that .
" Dell has always been a strong MS OEM ally and it is now hoping to cash in again from the impending upgrades .
" Wow , so we can expect a unbiased opinion then ?
PREPARE FOR SHPIEL !
" Dell made plain several times that he sees the installed base of technology as very old " which is to say , people are not fond of buying Vista packages " and sees a coming " refresh cycle , " for which he has high hopes " and that Dell is planning on making plenty of money off this , after Vista 's disappointment .
" The latest generation of chips from Intel is strong , particularly Nehalem , " So technology advances then , yes ?
Took some long-term observation of the industry to determine that factoid , I 'll bet .
" I 've been using Windows 7 for a long time now , and if you get the latest processor technology and Office 2010 with it , you will love your PC again .
" So you buy Windows , but you 'll need a new computer ( let 's face it , the majority do not know what a CPU is ) and hey , whilst you 're there , why not buy a new version of Office for the giggles ?
" It 's a dramatic improvement " Improvement over what ?
Being able to carry out tasks 95 \ % of which we did 8 years ago on hardware with perhaps , oooh , 50 \ % of the capacity of modern tech ?
You 'll have to excuse me if I 'm not enticed into reading the article after that .
I 've had quite enough of reading about tech .
going backwards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think I've ever wanted Windows less having read that.
"Dell has always been a strong MS OEM ally and it is now hoping to cash in again from the impending upgrades.
" Wow, so we can expect a unbiased opinion then?
PREPARE FOR SHPIEL!
"Dell made plain several times that he sees the installed base of technology as very old" which is to say, people are not fond of buying Vista packages "and sees a coming "refresh cycle," for which he has high hopes" and that Dell is planning on making plenty of money off this, after Vista's disappointment.
"The latest generation of chips from Intel is strong, particularly Nehalem," So technology advances then, yes?
Took some long-term observation of the industry to determine that factoid, I'll bet.
"I've been using Windows 7 for a long time now, and if you get the latest processor technology and Office 2010 with it, you will love your PC again.
" So you buy Windows, but you'll need a new computer (let's face it, the majority do not know what a CPU is) and hey, whilst you're there, why not buy a new version of Office for the giggles?
"It's a dramatic improvement"

 Improvement over what?
Being able to carry out tasks 95\% of which we did 8 years ago on hardware with perhaps, oooh, 50\% of the capacity of modern tech?
You'll have to excuse me if I'm not enticed into reading the article after that.
I've had quite enough of reading about tech.
going backwards.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755833</id>
	<title>Re:Can somebody tell me why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255614840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NOTE: These are benefits when upgrading from XP. Vista has some of these features, but usually 7's implementation of these is more refined.</p><p>The biggie is that display driver crashes <a href="http://www.osnews.com/story/21999/Editorial\_X\_Could\_Learn\_a\_Lot\_from\_Vista\_Windows\_7" title="osnews.com" rel="nofollow">don't bring down your system</a> [osnews.com]. The display flickers for a bit and the driver is reloaded.</p><p>7 also supports multiple drivers for multiple adapters, but that's a bit esoteric.</p><p>Libraries are useful if you're not compulsive about organizing your files.</p><p>The user home folder is now sanely organized (C:\Users\User\Videos, C:\Users\User\Downloads, C:\Users\User\Documents, not C:\Documents and Settings\Username\My Documents\My Videos).</p><p>Ships with Powershell. Decent scripting out of the box.</p><p>The taskbar works MUCH better than XP/Vista and imho even the OSX dock. You no longer have to choose between the insanity of XP style grouped taskbar buttons and an overflowing taskbar. Much better window mgmt tools (e.g. desktop peek).</p><p>Very subjective, but feels snappy. Time to login screen and time to a usable desktop is much lower than Vista.</p><p>Built-in Windows Media Player (v12) starts quickly and is a pleasure to use. To be fair v11 was pretty good too, but v12 plays DivX (and all the xvids I've thrown at it) and most Quicktime MOVs. The interface is minimal if you double-click a media file. You get a simple rectangle containing the media, or a small square if it's an audio file. You get the full interface only if you start the app or click the expand UI button. This is what iTunes should have been like.</p><p>Explorer has improved its "are you sure" dialogs and made them much more usable/informative. Thumbnail previews are much faster. On the other hand, the new explorer takes some getting used to over the XP one -- the toolbar is non-customizable and not very useful imho.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NOTE : These are benefits when upgrading from XP .
Vista has some of these features , but usually 7 's implementation of these is more refined.The biggie is that display driver crashes do n't bring down your system [ osnews.com ] .
The display flickers for a bit and the driver is reloaded.7 also supports multiple drivers for multiple adapters , but that 's a bit esoteric.Libraries are useful if you 're not compulsive about organizing your files.The user home folder is now sanely organized ( C : \ Users \ User \ Videos , C : \ Users \ User \ Downloads , C : \ Users \ User \ Documents , not C : \ Documents and Settings \ Username \ My Documents \ My Videos ) .Ships with Powershell .
Decent scripting out of the box.The taskbar works MUCH better than XP/Vista and imho even the OSX dock .
You no longer have to choose between the insanity of XP style grouped taskbar buttons and an overflowing taskbar .
Much better window mgmt tools ( e.g .
desktop peek ) .Very subjective , but feels snappy .
Time to login screen and time to a usable desktop is much lower than Vista.Built-in Windows Media Player ( v12 ) starts quickly and is a pleasure to use .
To be fair v11 was pretty good too , but v12 plays DivX ( and all the xvids I 've thrown at it ) and most Quicktime MOVs .
The interface is minimal if you double-click a media file .
You get a simple rectangle containing the media , or a small square if it 's an audio file .
You get the full interface only if you start the app or click the expand UI button .
This is what iTunes should have been like.Explorer has improved its " are you sure " dialogs and made them much more usable/informative .
Thumbnail previews are much faster .
On the other hand , the new explorer takes some getting used to over the XP one -- the toolbar is non-customizable and not very useful imho .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NOTE: These are benefits when upgrading from XP.
Vista has some of these features, but usually 7's implementation of these is more refined.The biggie is that display driver crashes don't bring down your system [osnews.com].
The display flickers for a bit and the driver is reloaded.7 also supports multiple drivers for multiple adapters, but that's a bit esoteric.Libraries are useful if you're not compulsive about organizing your files.The user home folder is now sanely organized (C:\Users\User\Videos, C:\Users\User\Downloads, C:\Users\User\Documents, not C:\Documents and Settings\Username\My Documents\My Videos).Ships with Powershell.
Decent scripting out of the box.The taskbar works MUCH better than XP/Vista and imho even the OSX dock.
You no longer have to choose between the insanity of XP style grouped taskbar buttons and an overflowing taskbar.
Much better window mgmt tools (e.g.
desktop peek).Very subjective, but feels snappy.
Time to login screen and time to a usable desktop is much lower than Vista.Built-in Windows Media Player (v12) starts quickly and is a pleasure to use.
To be fair v11 was pretty good too, but v12 plays DivX (and all the xvids I've thrown at it) and most Quicktime MOVs.
The interface is minimal if you double-click a media file.
You get a simple rectangle containing the media, or a small square if it's an audio file.
You get the full interface only if you start the app or click the expand UI button.
This is what iTunes should have been like.Explorer has improved its "are you sure" dialogs and made them much more usable/informative.
Thumbnail previews are much faster.
On the other hand, the new explorer takes some getting used to over the XP one -- the toolbar is non-customizable and not very useful imho.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756027</id>
	<title>QED</title>
	<author>RenHoek</author>
	<datestamp>1255615980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I buy myself new hardware with a spanking new top-of-the-line CPU and just re-install Windows XP, then I still get to see "a dramatic improvement".</p><p>That's not due to the version of Windows I dump on it, but the new hardware which happens to be a lot faster.</p><p>The TRUE question here is, do companies want to upgrade their CURRENT hardware, just to be able to run a new OS...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I buy myself new hardware with a spanking new top-of-the-line CPU and just re-install Windows XP , then I still get to see " a dramatic improvement " .That 's not due to the version of Windows I dump on it , but the new hardware which happens to be a lot faster.The TRUE question here is , do companies want to upgrade their CURRENT hardware , just to be able to run a new OS.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I buy myself new hardware with a spanking new top-of-the-line CPU and just re-install Windows XP, then I still get to see "a dramatic improvement".That's not due to the version of Windows I dump on it, but the new hardware which happens to be a lot faster.The TRUE question here is, do companies want to upgrade their CURRENT hardware, just to be able to run a new OS...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755601
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758453
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757423
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757695
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756771
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29765439
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757767
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758135
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756717
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758631
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29761207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758913
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757867
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758367
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757327
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756911
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759501
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29765297
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756221
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29761659
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757265
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759325
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755601
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755601
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29760745
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755513
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755657
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758665
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758141
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756049
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29762157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755963
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755577
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758131
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758797
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755983
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755509
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29775899
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759675
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757261
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755661
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755505
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756635
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756047
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756561
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756091
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759129
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755901
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29761463
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759609
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759983
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758123
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755427
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755577
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756917
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756629
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756387
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29764555
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758633
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29764065
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756079
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29776601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29760903
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755515
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29760851
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755577
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755705
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755383
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757873
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_0442259_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756835
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29763223
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755617
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755905
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757327
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757725
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755593
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757423
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756387
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756561
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29761207
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756911
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757255
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29775899
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758921
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758797
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755709
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755383
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755427
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755471
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757873
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756771
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756947
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758627
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757695
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756079
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29776601
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755901
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758217
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29761463
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755577
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755705
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756917
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758131
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755803
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755799
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29764065
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755747
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755633
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756077
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29762111
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755523
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758015
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29764555
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755963
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758123
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756717
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756047
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759501
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756289
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755601
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757105
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29760745
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758453
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758157
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756177
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29765297
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755379
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755515
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755585
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755915
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755557
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_0442259.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755415
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759289
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756043
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755567
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29760851
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756091
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758135
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755681
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755477
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755667
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755661
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755657
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756629
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755983
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755513
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755833
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757939
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756023
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759609
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755505
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757261
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757767
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756835
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755509
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758027
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756221
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756635
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29761659
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29755569
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758367
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756197
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759675
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29756297
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758141
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759983
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759325
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29762157
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758665
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29760903
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758631
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29759129
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758913
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757867
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29758633
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29757265
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_0442259.29765439
</commentlist>
</conversation>
