<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_17_2257212</id>
	<title>Futurama Voices Could Be Recast</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1247832900000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://theinfosphere.org/" rel="nofollow">Svippy</a> writes <i>"According to <a href="http://www.avclub.com/articles/futurama-to-get-recast-updated,30532/">reports surfacing on the Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118006123.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1"> <em>Futurama</em> may be recast</a>.  The animated series is due to <a href="//entertainment.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/06/10/1331258&amp;tid=2997">return next year</a> on Comedy Central, but may not be the same as we once knew it. 'As part of the announcement, the show's producers said stars including West, Sagal and DiMaggio had all signed on to return. Turns out that wasn't true. The stars had all expressed interest in returning. But with the budget for <em>Futurama</em> dramatically slashed, the salary offers came in well below what the thesps were asking.' Phil LaMarr posted <a href="http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=96103376147&amp;topic=8723">20th Century Fox's request for auditions</a> on his Facebook page. However, some are skeptical about whether it's a real casting call or purely <a href="http://futurama-madhouse.com.ar/index.shtml">a stunt to reduce the salaries of the voice actors</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Svippy writes " According to reports surfacing on the Internet , Futurama may be recast .
The animated series is due to return next year on Comedy Central , but may not be the same as we once knew it .
'As part of the announcement , the show 's producers said stars including West , Sagal and DiMaggio had all signed on to return .
Turns out that was n't true .
The stars had all expressed interest in returning .
But with the budget for Futurama dramatically slashed , the salary offers came in well below what the thesps were asking .
' Phil LaMarr posted 20th Century Fox 's request for auditions on his Facebook page .
However , some are skeptical about whether it 's a real casting call or purely a stunt to reduce the salaries of the voice actors .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Svippy writes "According to reports surfacing on the Internet,  Futurama may be recast.
The animated series is due to return next year on Comedy Central, but may not be the same as we once knew it.
'As part of the announcement, the show's producers said stars including West, Sagal and DiMaggio had all signed on to return.
Turns out that wasn't true.
The stars had all expressed interest in returning.
But with the budget for Futurama dramatically slashed, the salary offers came in well below what the thesps were asking.
' Phil LaMarr posted 20th Century Fox's request for auditions on his Facebook page.
However, some are skeptical about whether it's a real casting call or purely a stunt to reduce the salaries of the voice actors.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738847</id>
	<title>no way</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247947800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>new cast is bs man! it won't be the same. futurama is one of my favorite shows, not just because it's funny, but because of the character development. changing the voices will destroy all of that. even matt groening want simpsons canceled long ago to make way for futurama.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>new cast is bs man !
it wo n't be the same .
futurama is one of my favorite shows , not just because it 's funny , but because of the character development .
changing the voices will destroy all of that .
even matt groening want simpsons canceled long ago to make way for futurama .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>new cast is bs man!
it won't be the same.
futurama is one of my favorite shows, not just because it's funny, but because of the character development.
changing the voices will destroy all of that.
even matt groening want simpsons canceled long ago to make way for futurama.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738015</id>
	<title>They deserve it</title>
	<author>RazorSharp</author>
	<datestamp>1247848200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, Futurama has been rerun more than anything except for Family Guy in recent history. Then account for DVD sales, 360/PS3 sales, and licensed junk you find at Spencer's. Then consider how much the show would suck if they replaced the voices. They would loose all of that money. So the way I see it, the voice actors deserve to get paid a premium. Hell, Seinfeld is like a gazillionare and you don't see NBC or ABC or whoever originally ran it complaining. They offered him more to continue!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , Futurama has been rerun more than anything except for Family Guy in recent history .
Then account for DVD sales , 360/PS3 sales , and licensed junk you find at Spencer 's .
Then consider how much the show would suck if they replaced the voices .
They would loose all of that money .
So the way I see it , the voice actors deserve to get paid a premium .
Hell , Seinfeld is like a gazillionare and you do n't see NBC or ABC or whoever originally ran it complaining .
They offered him more to continue !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, Futurama has been rerun more than anything except for Family Guy in recent history.
Then account for DVD sales, 360/PS3 sales, and licensed junk you find at Spencer's.
Then consider how much the show would suck if they replaced the voices.
They would loose all of that money.
So the way I see it, the voice actors deserve to get paid a premium.
Hell, Seinfeld is like a gazillionare and you don't see NBC or ABC or whoever originally ran it complaining.
They offered him more to continue!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738675</id>
	<title>Re:Zapp Brannigan!</title>
	<author>Selfbain</author>
	<datestamp>1247859300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's funny you should bring up Zapp in a conversation about replacing voice actors.  He was supposed to be voiced by Phil Hartman before he died.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's funny you should bring up Zapp in a conversation about replacing voice actors .
He was supposed to be voiced by Phil Hartman before he died .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's funny you should bring up Zapp in a conversation about replacing voice actors.
He was supposed to be voiced by Phil Hartman before he died.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738307</id>
	<title>Re:Not watching without original cast.</title>
	<author>hedwards</author>
	<datestamp>1247852100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's generally the problem with cartoon series, most of the time you'll get one of three or four people doing 90\% of the voices. Which is also why it's so hard sometimes to figure out who's doing the voice.<br> <br>

There's already been a bit of that sort of shenanigans with some of the minor characters, I think that Santa was among some that was done by different voice actors over time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's generally the problem with cartoon series , most of the time you 'll get one of three or four people doing 90 \ % of the voices .
Which is also why it 's so hard sometimes to figure out who 's doing the voice .
There 's already been a bit of that sort of shenanigans with some of the minor characters , I think that Santa was among some that was done by different voice actors over time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's generally the problem with cartoon series, most of the time you'll get one of three or four people doing 90\% of the voices.
Which is also why it's so hard sometimes to figure out who's doing the voice.
There's already been a bit of that sort of shenanigans with some of the minor characters, I think that Santa was among some that was done by different voice actors over time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017</id>
	<title>Speech-to-text</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247838000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They have what, 100+ hours of speech recorded for Futurama, presumably the original masters as well? Probably 1,000 hours of speech for <b>each character</b> on The Simpsons on masters. Not to mention accurate closed captioning for the voicings. How hard would it be to write an algorithm to cut and paste the correct words (picking the correct word inflection based on word placement in the sentence/context - presumably there are angry, happy, elated, monotone versions of most words, and the sound files can be edited to convincingly make them sound in context) together? Sure, you'd have to hand-synthesize the occasional odd word or celebrity-head-in-a-jar's name, but we're probably not very far off from being able to fire the voice actors after the third season of a dialog-driven cartoon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They have what , 100 + hours of speech recorded for Futurama , presumably the original masters as well ?
Probably 1,000 hours of speech for each character on The Simpsons on masters .
Not to mention accurate closed captioning for the voicings .
How hard would it be to write an algorithm to cut and paste the correct words ( picking the correct word inflection based on word placement in the sentence/context - presumably there are angry , happy , elated , monotone versions of most words , and the sound files can be edited to convincingly make them sound in context ) together ?
Sure , you 'd have to hand-synthesize the occasional odd word or celebrity-head-in-a-jar 's name , but we 're probably not very far off from being able to fire the voice actors after the third season of a dialog-driven cartoon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They have what, 100+ hours of speech recorded for Futurama, presumably the original masters as well?
Probably 1,000 hours of speech for each character on The Simpsons on masters.
Not to mention accurate closed captioning for the voicings.
How hard would it be to write an algorithm to cut and paste the correct words (picking the correct word inflection based on word placement in the sentence/context - presumably there are angry, happy, elated, monotone versions of most words, and the sound files can be edited to convincingly make them sound in context) together?
Sure, you'd have to hand-synthesize the occasional odd word or celebrity-head-in-a-jar's name, but we're probably not very far off from being able to fire the voice actors after the third season of a dialog-driven cartoon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737589</id>
	<title>Chicago Joe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247843220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>people that are sticking up for the studio and claiming that the show will still be the same I am calling you out "You are not true fans of the show" you cant be. If this is to be a true business decision then make the right one. Let the show die. Go ahead blame it on the actors I dont care call it greed whatever. True fans of this show would never except an imatation Bender. Let it die or lose a ton of cash trying to shove crap down our troats.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>people that are sticking up for the studio and claiming that the show will still be the same I am calling you out " You are not true fans of the show " you cant be .
If this is to be a true business decision then make the right one .
Let the show die .
Go ahead blame it on the actors I dont care call it greed whatever .
True fans of this show would never except an imatation Bender .
Let it die or lose a ton of cash trying to shove crap down our troats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>people that are sticking up for the studio and claiming that the show will still be the same I am calling you out "You are not true fans of the show" you cant be.
If this is to be a true business decision then make the right one.
Let the show die.
Go ahead blame it on the actors I dont care call it greed whatever.
True fans of this show would never except an imatation Bender.
Let it die or lose a ton of cash trying to shove crap down our troats.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737053</id>
	<title>New Voices?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247838300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sweet gorilla of Manilla!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sweet gorilla of Manilla !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sweet gorilla of Manilla!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736889</id>
	<title>Re:Not watching without original cast.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247837160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or Zoidburg, or Farnsworth...
But yeah, Fry's voice is classic Billy West, and unimitable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or Zoidburg , or Farnsworth.. . But yeah , Fry 's voice is classic Billy West , and unimitable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or Zoidburg, or Farnsworth...
But yeah, Fry's voice is classic Billy West, and unimitable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736823</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738665</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247859060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is what Slashdot is all about, two comic book store guys battling it out<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is what Slashdot is all about , two comic book store guys battling it out : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is what Slashdot is all about, two comic book store guys battling it out :D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737659</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739159</id>
	<title>Re:voices</title>
	<author>Phroggy</author>
	<datestamp>1247910120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anyway, although it does seem that [Joss Whedon's] involvement, while not lowering quality imho, does seem to doom some shows. Why is that?</p></div><p>If you listen to what fans are saying about <i>Dollhouse</i>, a lot of people think the first few episodes were pretty mediocre - one fan said the first five episodes were like five different pilots.  But then things started to improve, and by the end of the season the show was absolutely great.  Alan Tudyk's performance in the last two episodes was brilliant.</p><p>Now look at the ratings.  The first few episodes did pretty well, but then the numbers start going downhill, and the final episode got the worst ratings of the season.</p><p>If Joss' involvement dooms a show, it's not because he lowers the quality.  It's because the majority of the audience would rather be watching <i>Friends</i> reruns.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyway , although it does seem that [ Joss Whedon 's ] involvement , while not lowering quality imho , does seem to doom some shows .
Why is that ? If you listen to what fans are saying about Dollhouse , a lot of people think the first few episodes were pretty mediocre - one fan said the first five episodes were like five different pilots .
But then things started to improve , and by the end of the season the show was absolutely great .
Alan Tudyk 's performance in the last two episodes was brilliant.Now look at the ratings .
The first few episodes did pretty well , but then the numbers start going downhill , and the final episode got the worst ratings of the season.If Joss ' involvement dooms a show , it 's not because he lowers the quality .
It 's because the majority of the audience would rather be watching Friends reruns .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyway, although it does seem that [Joss Whedon's] involvement, while not lowering quality imho, does seem to doom some shows.
Why is that?If you listen to what fans are saying about Dollhouse, a lot of people think the first few episodes were pretty mediocre - one fan said the first five episodes were like five different pilots.
But then things started to improve, and by the end of the season the show was absolutely great.
Alan Tudyk's performance in the last two episodes was brilliant.Now look at the ratings.
The first few episodes did pretty well, but then the numbers start going downhill, and the final episode got the worst ratings of the season.If Joss' involvement dooms a show, it's not because he lowers the quality.
It's because the majority of the audience would rather be watching Friends reruns.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737715</id>
	<title>katey segal doing just fine.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247844420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She's in "Son's of Anarchy", plus she's married to a producer, and the MWC royalties come in. Trust me, she isn't hurting for spending money or worrying if she'll miss the next slashdot dupe because the IP bill is overdue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She 's in " Son 's of Anarchy " , plus she 's married to a producer , and the MWC royalties come in .
Trust me , she is n't hurting for spending money or worrying if she 'll miss the next slashdot dupe because the IP bill is overdue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She's in "Son's of Anarchy", plus she's married to a producer, and the MWC royalties come in.
Trust me, she isn't hurting for spending money or worrying if she'll miss the next slashdot dupe because the IP bill is overdue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736815</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736919</id>
	<title>Obviously...</title>
	<author>VinylRecords</author>
	<datestamp>1247837340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously the executives didn't take the Torgo's Executive Powder jokes all that well...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously the executives did n't take the Torgo 's Executive Powder jokes all that well.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously the executives didn't take the Torgo's Executive Powder jokes all that well...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738753</id>
	<title>Re:Other articles worthy of reading</title>
	<author>linzeal</author>
	<datestamp>1247860140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sweet Zombie Jesus can't they cancel Foxnews and pay these fine voice actors what they are worth?  I don't know anyone that watches Foxnews here in Portland.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sweet Zombie Jesus ca n't they cancel Foxnews and pay these fine voice actors what they are worth ?
I do n't know anyone that watches Foxnews here in Portland .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sweet Zombie Jesus can't they cancel Foxnews and pay these fine voice actors what they are worth?
I don't know anyone that watches Foxnews here in Portland.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739247</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247911500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Didn't he say: "Bad news, nobody, the super collider super exploded...". You had also better hand it over.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't he say : " Bad news , nobody , the super collider super exploded... " .
You had also better hand it over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't he say: "Bad news, nobody, the super collider super exploded...".
You had also better hand it over.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737659</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737081</id>
	<title>To save money on the animation...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247838600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...they are going to go back to those talking upsidedown chin characters.</p><p>I predict success.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...they are going to go back to those talking upsidedown chin characters.I predict success .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...they are going to go back to those talking upsidedown chin characters.I predict success.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739957</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247924100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no u.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no u .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no u.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737659</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738851</id>
	<title>Re:Why not just make them sound the same?</title>
	<author>bogjobber</author>
	<datestamp>1247947860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A lot of times the voice actor is recast because those running the shows didn't like the voice in the first place.  Other times they just don't care enough to bother.<br> <br>

I'm pretty sure most people don't notice anyway.  I was watching Family Guy one time with a bunch of guys that were all "big fans" who had seen every episode and half didn't even know they changed the voice of Meg after the first season.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of times the voice actor is recast because those running the shows did n't like the voice in the first place .
Other times they just do n't care enough to bother .
I 'm pretty sure most people do n't notice anyway .
I was watching Family Guy one time with a bunch of guys that were all " big fans " who had seen every episode and half did n't even know they changed the voice of Meg after the first season .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of times the voice actor is recast because those running the shows didn't like the voice in the first place.
Other times they just don't care enough to bother.
I'm pretty sure most people don't notice anyway.
I was watching Family Guy one time with a bunch of guys that were all "big fans" who had seen every episode and half didn't even know they changed the voice of Meg after the first season.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737381</id>
	<title>Zapp Brannigan!</title>
	<author>Werrismys</author>
	<datestamp>1247841180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>As long as they keep Zapp Brannigan, Zoidberg, and Fry. They're perfect. Except Fry, who sucks. But excels at it. And the professor. And the hypnotoad. All bow to the mighty hypnotoad.
<p>
They could replace<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... the kids, the rasta dude, the japanese chick, etc.
</p><p>
They could find an even sexier Leelaaaah... Leeluuuhh... Lee-Laaa.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as they keep Zapp Brannigan , Zoidberg , and Fry .
They 're perfect .
Except Fry , who sucks .
But excels at it .
And the professor .
And the hypnotoad .
All bow to the mighty hypnotoad .
They could replace ... the kids , the rasta dude , the japanese chick , etc .
They could find an even sexier Leelaaaah... Leeluuuhh... Lee-Laaa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as they keep Zapp Brannigan, Zoidberg, and Fry.
They're perfect.
Except Fry, who sucks.
But excels at it.
And the professor.
And the hypnotoad.
All bow to the mighty hypnotoad.
They could replace ... the kids, the rasta dude, the japanese chick, etc.
They could find an even sexier Leelaaaah... Leeluuuhh... Lee-Laaa.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738865</id>
	<title>Re:Speech-to-text</title>
	<author>bogjobber</author>
	<datestamp>1247948100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p><i>How hard would it be to write an algorithm to cut and paste the correct words (picking the correct word inflection based on word placement in the sentence/context - presumably there are angry, happy, elated, monotone versions of most words, and the sound files can be edited to convincingly make them sound in context) together?</i></p></div>  </blockquote><p>Very, very hard.  Synthesized voices are absolutely horrible at capturing proper inflection and tone.  They can't even get a customer service menu to sound remotely human, let alone get the timing and creativity needed for good comedy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How hard would it be to write an algorithm to cut and paste the correct words ( picking the correct word inflection based on word placement in the sentence/context - presumably there are angry , happy , elated , monotone versions of most words , and the sound files can be edited to convincingly make them sound in context ) together ?
Very , very hard .
Synthesized voices are absolutely horrible at capturing proper inflection and tone .
They ca n't even get a customer service menu to sound remotely human , let alone get the timing and creativity needed for good comedy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How hard would it be to write an algorithm to cut and paste the correct words (picking the correct word inflection based on word placement in the sentence/context - presumably there are angry, happy, elated, monotone versions of most words, and the sound files can be edited to convincingly make them sound in context) together?
Very, very hard.
Synthesized voices are absolutely horrible at capturing proper inflection and tone.
They can't even get a customer service menu to sound remotely human, let alone get the timing and creativity needed for good comedy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737321</id>
	<title>Not necessarily that bad</title>
	<author>Fleeced</author>
	<datestamp>1247840760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In theory, it wouldn't really bother me as long as the characters sounded the same - that's one of the benefits of cartoons - that the "actors" never age on screen, so you can repeatedly recast the voices and keep the show going for decades... but in reality, the voice actors have grown into the role and provide numerous nuances that make up part of who the characters are.  Replacing them all at once would certainly be noticeable, IMO.
</p><p>
People need to settle down though.  Pretending that they're never going to watch if one one the voice actors is replaced doesn't fool anyone - you will still watch (at least at first), and you know it.  Yes, I'm worried - but the voice actors aren't the whole show.  Painting the producers as the big greedy corporates playing hardball is a bit one-side - the voice actors are playing the same game, which is as it should be... I suspect they will come to some agreement in the end.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In theory , it would n't really bother me as long as the characters sounded the same - that 's one of the benefits of cartoons - that the " actors " never age on screen , so you can repeatedly recast the voices and keep the show going for decades... but in reality , the voice actors have grown into the role and provide numerous nuances that make up part of who the characters are .
Replacing them all at once would certainly be noticeable , IMO .
People need to settle down though .
Pretending that they 're never going to watch if one one the voice actors is replaced does n't fool anyone - you will still watch ( at least at first ) , and you know it .
Yes , I 'm worried - but the voice actors are n't the whole show .
Painting the producers as the big greedy corporates playing hardball is a bit one-side - the voice actors are playing the same game , which is as it should be... I suspect they will come to some agreement in the end .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In theory, it wouldn't really bother me as long as the characters sounded the same - that's one of the benefits of cartoons - that the "actors" never age on screen, so you can repeatedly recast the voices and keep the show going for decades... but in reality, the voice actors have grown into the role and provide numerous nuances that make up part of who the characters are.
Replacing them all at once would certainly be noticeable, IMO.
People need to settle down though.
Pretending that they're never going to watch if one one the voice actors is replaced doesn't fool anyone - you will still watch (at least at first), and you know it.
Yes, I'm worried - but the voice actors aren't the whole show.
Painting the producers as the big greedy corporates playing hardball is a bit one-side - the voice actors are playing the same game, which is as it should be... I suspect they will come to some agreement in the end.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28741941</id>
	<title>Re:Not watching without original cast.</title>
	<author>paiute</author>
	<datestamp>1247941860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, like when he was the only voice of Ren.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , like when he was the only voice of Ren .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, like when he was the only voice of Ren.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736971</id>
	<title>Good news everyone!</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1247837700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.geekstir.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/goodneweveryone.jpg" title="geekstir.com">I've invented a device which makes you read this in your head, in my voice!</a> [geekstir.com]</p><p>Which is a good thing because you <i>won't</i> actually be hearing my voice while you watch the show! Better turn subtitles on, mwa?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've invented a device which makes you read this in your head , in my voice !
[ geekstir.com ] Which is a good thing because you wo n't actually be hearing my voice while you watch the show !
Better turn subtitles on , mwa ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've invented a device which makes you read this in your head, in my voice!
[geekstir.com]Which is a good thing because you won't actually be hearing my voice while you watch the show!
Better turn subtitles on, mwa?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737307</id>
	<title>This is how much i want futurama back</title>
	<author>lindoran</author>
	<datestamp>1247840580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't care if they cast satan himself as a voice actor... seriously i just want futurama back.... I could give a sh*t less about who dose the voice acting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't care if they cast satan himself as a voice actor... seriously i just want futurama back.... I could give a sh * t less about who dose the voice acting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't care if they cast satan himself as a voice actor... seriously i just want futurama back.... I could give a sh*t less about who dose the voice acting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739937</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247923740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Buddah, Zeus, God... one of you guys do something! Help! Satan, you owe me!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Buddah , Zeus , God... one of you guys do something !
Help ! Satan , you owe me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Buddah, Zeus, God... one of you guys do something!
Help! Satan, you owe me!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737659</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737597</id>
	<title>Re:voices</title>
	<author>VocationalZero</author>
	<datestamp>1247843340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was completely with you until<p><div class="quote"><p> Or a consult with Joss Whedon.</p> </div><p>Then I looked at your name, and suddenly it all became clear. Hahah! Ironic because by the same logic my opinion is also moot! Wait, but by saying that... Uh...
<br>
Anyway, although it does seem that his involvement, while not lowering quality imho, does seem to doom some shows. Why is that?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was completely with you until Or a consult with Joss Whedon .
Then I looked at your name , and suddenly it all became clear .
Hahah ! Ironic because by the same logic my opinion is also moot !
Wait , but by saying that... Uh.. . Anyway , although it does seem that his involvement , while not lowering quality imho , does seem to doom some shows .
Why is that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was completely with you until Or a consult with Joss Whedon.
Then I looked at your name, and suddenly it all became clear.
Hahah! Ironic because by the same logic my opinion is also moot!
Wait, but by saying that... Uh...

Anyway, although it does seem that his involvement, while not lowering quality imho, does seem to doom some shows.
Why is that?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737015</id>
	<title>Re:Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247838000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"How effective would it be if thousands of fans submitted MP3 via email stating, "Leave the cast alone!" in varying degrees of passion and vernacular?"<br>Farnsworth: "Well, we won't know that until they actually do it".<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" How effective would it be if thousands of fans submitted MP3 via email stating , " Leave the cast alone !
" in varying degrees of passion and vernacular ?
" Farnsworth : " Well , we wo n't know that until they actually do it " .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How effective would it be if thousands of fans submitted MP3 via email stating, "Leave the cast alone!
" in varying degrees of passion and vernacular?
"Farnsworth: "Well, we won't know that until they actually do it".
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736809</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737209</id>
	<title>Re:Speech-to-text</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247839800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It worked real well for South Park with Isaac Hayes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It worked real well for South Park with Isaac Hayes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It worked real well for South Park with Isaac Hayes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740439</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247929260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, I can click "tags" up in the header, and see every story that I've myself marked, e.g. "biotech", or just "cool". That's pretty useful, especially for project I'd like to come back to later to see how they turn out. (Slashdot's not much for follow-up stories.)<br>If I had a long list of articles tagged "whocares" and the like it would presumably be less useful, but who cares, it's good for a meme and a laugh, and at least people seem to be somewhat in consensus on using them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I can click " tags " up in the header , and see every story that I 've myself marked , e.g .
" biotech " , or just " cool " .
That 's pretty useful , especially for project I 'd like to come back to later to see how they turn out .
( Slashdot 's not much for follow-up stories .
) If I had a long list of articles tagged " whocares " and the like it would presumably be less useful , but who cares , it 's good for a meme and a laugh , and at least people seem to be somewhat in consensus on using them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I can click "tags" up in the header, and see every story that I've myself marked, e.g.
"biotech", or just "cool".
That's pretty useful, especially for project I'd like to come back to later to see how they turn out.
(Slashdot's not much for follow-up stories.
)If I had a long list of articles tagged "whocares" and the like it would presumably be less useful, but who cares, it's good for a meme and a laugh, and at least people seem to be somewhat in consensus on using them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738933</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736853</id>
	<title>if someone knows the amount</title>
	<author>markringen</author>
	<datestamp>1247836980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>if someone knows the amount send me a message!
i can probably pull some strings somewhere, i hope it isn't in the millions because that many strings i don't have<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>if someone knows the amount send me a message !
i can probably pull some strings somewhere , i hope it is n't in the millions because that many strings i do n't have : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if someone knows the amount send me a message!
i can probably pull some strings somewhere, i hope it isn't in the millions because that many strings i don't have :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737781</id>
	<title>Re:Idea</title>
	<author>Kreigaffe</author>
	<datestamp>1247845020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was 'marginally profitable' for Fox because they aired it at 7pm est on sundays.  1 hour before the Simpsons.  At that point in time they were also putting out commercials for their Sunday line-up that stated...  "YOUR SUNDAY STARTS AT 8!"</p><p>I don't know if you recall that, but I do.  Futurama was marginalized right out of the gate by Fox.  Right now, I think there's 3 or 4 networks showing reruns of Futurama, which is at least one network per season..  clearly, the show WAS good, and SHOULD have been profitable, but suffered from a godawful time slot, NFL-preemptions, and a complete lack of any interest in promoting it by Fox.<br>The movies also suffered for similar reasons..  I guess they were on TV but I'll be damned if I know when.</p><p>I'd be willing to bet that the slashed budget is just ComCen trying to be cheap-asses (as usual).  Exactly what programming on that channel is really worth anything anymore, please remind me?  daily show, colbert, and southpark are the only original content I can find on comedy central in the next 4 days.  Oh, and Michael and Michael, which just looks like it's going to be bad.  They titular actors look BORED in the PROMO COMMERCIALS for their own show.  YEAH!  I'll watch that, oh yeah.</p><p>Nah..  this is just comedy central trying to make money without spending money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was 'marginally profitable ' for Fox because they aired it at 7pm est on sundays .
1 hour before the Simpsons .
At that point in time they were also putting out commercials for their Sunday line-up that stated... " YOUR SUNDAY STARTS AT 8 !
" I do n't know if you recall that , but I do .
Futurama was marginalized right out of the gate by Fox .
Right now , I think there 's 3 or 4 networks showing reruns of Futurama , which is at least one network per season.. clearly , the show WAS good , and SHOULD have been profitable , but suffered from a godawful time slot , NFL-preemptions , and a complete lack of any interest in promoting it by Fox.The movies also suffered for similar reasons.. I guess they were on TV but I 'll be damned if I know when.I 'd be willing to bet that the slashed budget is just ComCen trying to be cheap-asses ( as usual ) .
Exactly what programming on that channel is really worth anything anymore , please remind me ?
daily show , colbert , and southpark are the only original content I can find on comedy central in the next 4 days .
Oh , and Michael and Michael , which just looks like it 's going to be bad .
They titular actors look BORED in the PROMO COMMERCIALS for their own show .
YEAH ! I 'll watch that , oh yeah.Nah.. this is just comedy central trying to make money without spending money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was 'marginally profitable' for Fox because they aired it at 7pm est on sundays.
1 hour before the Simpsons.
At that point in time they were also putting out commercials for their Sunday line-up that stated...  "YOUR SUNDAY STARTS AT 8!
"I don't know if you recall that, but I do.
Futurama was marginalized right out of the gate by Fox.
Right now, I think there's 3 or 4 networks showing reruns of Futurama, which is at least one network per season..  clearly, the show WAS good, and SHOULD have been profitable, but suffered from a godawful time slot, NFL-preemptions, and a complete lack of any interest in promoting it by Fox.The movies also suffered for similar reasons..  I guess they were on TV but I'll be damned if I know when.I'd be willing to bet that the slashed budget is just ComCen trying to be cheap-asses (as usual).
Exactly what programming on that channel is really worth anything anymore, please remind me?
daily show, colbert, and southpark are the only original content I can find on comedy central in the next 4 days.
Oh, and Michael and Michael, which just looks like it's going to be bad.
They titular actors look BORED in the PROMO COMMERCIALS for their own show.
YEAH!  I'll watch that, oh yeah.Nah..  this is just comedy central trying to make money without spending money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738751</id>
	<title>Re:Speech-to-text</title>
	<author>knappe duivel</author>
	<datestamp>1247860140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Won't work. The way words are pronounced depends on the surrounding words. Also, words are not seperate soundbites but a continuous stream of sound. It is not possible to cut one word out of a sentence and keep it distinguishable. Written language suggests words are seperate entities, but looking at a graphical display of sound there is no way to count the words in a spoken sentence.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wo n't work .
The way words are pronounced depends on the surrounding words .
Also , words are not seperate soundbites but a continuous stream of sound .
It is not possible to cut one word out of a sentence and keep it distinguishable .
Written language suggests words are seperate entities , but looking at a graphical display of sound there is no way to count the words in a spoken sentence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Won't work.
The way words are pronounced depends on the surrounding words.
Also, words are not seperate soundbites but a continuous stream of sound.
It is not possible to cut one word out of a sentence and keep it distinguishable.
Written language suggests words are seperate entities, but looking at a graphical display of sound there is no way to count the words in a spoken sentence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807</id>
	<title>ob</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247836620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bite my shiny metal ass!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bite my shiny metal ass !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bite my shiny metal ass!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740187</id>
	<title>Re:So how are they going to explain the new voices</title>
	<author>zsau</author>
	<datestamp>1247926920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>[b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']</i></p><p>In your sig, "us" and "you" really should be variables, not string constants. Who they refer to depends on the context, y'see.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>[ b.belong ( 'us ' ) for b in bases if b.owner ( ) = = 'you ' ] In your sig , " us " and " you " really should be variables , not string constants .
Who they refer to depends on the context , y'see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']In your sig, "us" and "you" really should be variables, not string constants.
Who they refer to depends on the context, y'see.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737969</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738443</id>
	<title>Re:So how are they going to explain the new voices</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247854680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>two words: law &amp; order</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>two words : law &amp; order</tokentext>
<sentencetext>two words: law &amp; order</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740633</id>
	<title>Re:Speech-to-text</title>
	<author>Vellmont</author>
	<datestamp>1247930880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think eventually you could do what you're saying and make it sound natural.</p><p>The thing you'll NEVER be able to automate is determining how you want the character to say a particular phrase.  Surprise?  Delight?  Sadness?  A subtle combination of all three?  An emphasis on this word or that word?  That kind of work takes talent.  At that point, why not just hire the actual people manipulate their actual voice rather than technicians sitting in a room trying to manipulate software?  The software is always going to have severe limitations in what it can do.  Sure you can add in new abilities, but who wants to tweak someones voice to do this or that, then be told "we don't currently support that feature", and then wait 6 months for it to be (possibly) added?  The talent of voice actors isn't simply the ability to create a certain sounding voice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think eventually you could do what you 're saying and make it sound natural.The thing you 'll NEVER be able to automate is determining how you want the character to say a particular phrase .
Surprise ? Delight ?
Sadness ? A subtle combination of all three ?
An emphasis on this word or that word ?
That kind of work takes talent .
At that point , why not just hire the actual people manipulate their actual voice rather than technicians sitting in a room trying to manipulate software ?
The software is always going to have severe limitations in what it can do .
Sure you can add in new abilities , but who wants to tweak someones voice to do this or that , then be told " we do n't currently support that feature " , and then wait 6 months for it to be ( possibly ) added ?
The talent of voice actors is n't simply the ability to create a certain sounding voice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think eventually you could do what you're saying and make it sound natural.The thing you'll NEVER be able to automate is determining how you want the character to say a particular phrase.
Surprise?  Delight?
Sadness?  A subtle combination of all three?
An emphasis on this word or that word?
That kind of work takes talent.
At that point, why not just hire the actual people manipulate their actual voice rather than technicians sitting in a room trying to manipulate software?
The software is always going to have severe limitations in what it can do.
Sure you can add in new abilities, but who wants to tweak someones voice to do this or that, then be told "we don't currently support that feature", and then wait 6 months for it to be (possibly) added?
The talent of voice actors isn't simply the ability to create a certain sounding voice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740859</id>
	<title>Re:Other articles worthy of reading</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1247932980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's because you live in Portland. Move down to Alabama sometime.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's because you live in Portland .
Move down to Alabama sometime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's because you live in Portland.
Move down to Alabama sometime.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28741977</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>Hal\_Porter</author>
	<datestamp>1247942280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe people use badnewseveryone to subvert the cliche of using goodneweveryone ironically. Or they are trolling. Or badnewseveryone is one of the famed steganographic tages used to transmit information about That Which Must Not Be Spoken Of.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe people use badnewseveryone to subvert the cliche of using goodneweveryone ironically .
Or they are trolling .
Or badnewseveryone is one of the famed steganographic tages used to transmit information about That Which Must Not Be Spoken Of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe people use badnewseveryone to subvert the cliche of using goodneweveryone ironically.
Or they are trolling.
Or badnewseveryone is one of the famed steganographic tages used to transmit information about That Which Must Not Be Spoken Of.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737325</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737529</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>Darinbob</author>
	<datestamp>1247842680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bad news everyone!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bad news everyone !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bad news everyone!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737619</id>
	<title>calculon</title>
	<author>sukotto</author>
	<datestamp>1247843520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>NNNNOOOOOOOOoooooooooo!

(It was supposed to be "yes", but I gave it a little twist)</htmltext>
<tokenext>NNNNOOOOOOOOoooooooooo !
( It was supposed to be " yes " , but I gave it a little twist )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NNNNOOOOOOOOoooooooooo!
(It was supposed to be "yes", but I gave it a little twist)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738195</id>
	<title>Re:So how are they going to explain the new voices</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247850840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doctor Who?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Doctor Who ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doctor Who?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28745345</id>
	<title>Re:So how are they going to explain the new voices</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247935980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My ardent hope is that they do exactly this, then at the end of the episode, the big reveal is that this whole thing was secretly engineered as just an epic joke, and all the transplants and reprogramming are reversed.  Would be awesome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My ardent hope is that they do exactly this , then at the end of the episode , the big reveal is that this whole thing was secretly engineered as just an epic joke , and all the transplants and reprogramming are reversed .
Would be awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My ardent hope is that they do exactly this, then at the end of the episode, the big reveal is that this whole thing was secretly engineered as just an epic joke, and all the transplants and reprogramming are reversed.
Would be awesome.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737023</id>
	<title>Re:Idea</title>
	<author>risk one</author>
	<datestamp>1247838060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Very effective! They could probably cut the voicework for three really low-budget episodes out of that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Very effective !
They could probably cut the voicework for three really low-budget episodes out of that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very effective!
They could probably cut the voicework for three really low-budget episodes out of that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736809</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740025</id>
	<title>trosor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247925060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>very funny</p><p><a href="http://www.handlanu.com/" title="handlanu.com" rel="nofollow">sexiga underkl&#195;der</a> [handlanu.com] </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>very funnysexiga underkl   der [ handlanu.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>very funnysexiga underklÃder [handlanu.com] </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738925</id>
	<title>Re:Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247948760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you really think the reason voice actors get paid as much as they do is because they are recognizable?  What have you been smoking?  Even for the most recognizable actors in the most recognizable shows (say Hank Azaria, Trey Parker, Seth McFarlane, Billy West, etc.) 99\% of the people who watch the show couldn't even tell you the name of the actor or what voices they do.  I doubt they would be bothered if the studio brought in a replica voice.</p><p>Voice acting is extremely difficult, and some of these people are absolute masters of the craft.  They definitely deserve what small amount of acclaim they receive.</p><p>And FYI, most writers have a lot of respect the voice actors.  The Simpsons team refused to go back to work after the studio lowballed the voice actors, and forced Fox to raise their salaries.  The writers know how important the actors are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you really think the reason voice actors get paid as much as they do is because they are recognizable ?
What have you been smoking ?
Even for the most recognizable actors in the most recognizable shows ( say Hank Azaria , Trey Parker , Seth McFarlane , Billy West , etc .
) 99 \ % of the people who watch the show could n't even tell you the name of the actor or what voices they do .
I doubt they would be bothered if the studio brought in a replica voice.Voice acting is extremely difficult , and some of these people are absolute masters of the craft .
They definitely deserve what small amount of acclaim they receive.And FYI , most writers have a lot of respect the voice actors .
The Simpsons team refused to go back to work after the studio lowballed the voice actors , and forced Fox to raise their salaries .
The writers know how important the actors are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you really think the reason voice actors get paid as much as they do is because they are recognizable?
What have you been smoking?
Even for the most recognizable actors in the most recognizable shows (say Hank Azaria, Trey Parker, Seth McFarlane, Billy West, etc.
) 99\% of the people who watch the show couldn't even tell you the name of the actor or what voices they do.
I doubt they would be bothered if the studio brought in a replica voice.Voice acting is extremely difficult, and some of these people are absolute masters of the craft.
They definitely deserve what small amount of acclaim they receive.And FYI, most writers have a lot of respect the voice actors.
The Simpsons team refused to go back to work after the studio lowballed the voice actors, and forced Fox to raise their salaries.
The writers know how important the actors are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737931</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737073</id>
	<title>Re:Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247838540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Might be effective in getting the producers to dump the show again. Despite the fan base among geeks, it's obviously marginally profitable at best for them, hence the fact that it was already canceled once and the "dramatically slashed" budget this time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Might be effective in getting the producers to dump the show again .
Despite the fan base among geeks , it 's obviously marginally profitable at best for them , hence the fact that it was already canceled once and the " dramatically slashed " budget this time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Might be effective in getting the producers to dump the show again.
Despite the fan base among geeks, it's obviously marginally profitable at best for them, hence the fact that it was already canceled once and the "dramatically slashed" budget this time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736809</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737969</id>
	<title>Re:So how are they going to explain the new voices</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247847720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>on the show? The crew gets into a horrible accident that requires them to get voice box transplants, and Bender's voice gets erased and he is programmed with a different one.</p></div><p>What a nice idea.  If this recasting turns out to be a bluff, I'd love to see them poke fun at it for the opening of the first new episode...get random people the mail room, HR, etc., to voice everybody for the first 5 minutes (or something similar).</p><p>Of course if they actually recast, I expect it will go down in flames...I just can't see it being the same.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>on the show ?
The crew gets into a horrible accident that requires them to get voice box transplants , and Bender 's voice gets erased and he is programmed with a different one.What a nice idea .
If this recasting turns out to be a bluff , I 'd love to see them poke fun at it for the opening of the first new episode...get random people the mail room , HR , etc. , to voice everybody for the first 5 minutes ( or something similar ) .Of course if they actually recast , I expect it will go down in flames...I just ca n't see it being the same .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>on the show?
The crew gets into a horrible accident that requires them to get voice box transplants, and Bender's voice gets erased and he is programmed with a different one.What a nice idea.
If this recasting turns out to be a bluff, I'd love to see them poke fun at it for the opening of the first new episode...get random people the mail room, HR, etc., to voice everybody for the first 5 minutes (or something similar).Of course if they actually recast, I expect it will go down in flames...I just can't see it being the same.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737931</id>
	<title>Re:Idea</title>
	<author>timeOday</author>
	<datestamp>1247847180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am a fan, but I don't care whether they re-cast.  I think voice actors are grossly overpaid for what they do, taking advantage of their status as semi-recognizable and, for that reason only, hard to replace.  The real genius behind the show was its writing, but writers are behind the scenes so they can't blackmail the producers for more $$$.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am a fan , but I do n't care whether they re-cast .
I think voice actors are grossly overpaid for what they do , taking advantage of their status as semi-recognizable and , for that reason only , hard to replace .
The real genius behind the show was its writing , but writers are behind the scenes so they ca n't blackmail the producers for more $ $ $ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am a fan, but I don't care whether they re-cast.
I think voice actors are grossly overpaid for what they do, taking advantage of their status as semi-recognizable and, for that reason only, hard to replace.
The real genius behind the show was its writing, but writers are behind the scenes so they can't blackmail the producers for more $$$.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736809</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737767</id>
	<title>OH FUCK THAT!!!!!.....</title>
	<author>IHC Navistar</author>
	<datestamp>1247844900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.....And yet, FOX slaughters yet another potential cash cow.</p><p>Honestly, what is with companies that take great ideas and totally ruin them in the name of "improving" them?</p><p>I could talk about such epic fuck-ups ad nauseum, but I'll limit my post to.....</p><p>FUCK THAT. Futurama will lose the vast majority of what it has built up over the years because those asinine morons at the network can't realize a potential major cash source.</p><p>Good job FOX. You are about to destroy something very valuable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.....And yet , FOX slaughters yet another potential cash cow.Honestly , what is with companies that take great ideas and totally ruin them in the name of " improving " them ? I could talk about such epic fuck-ups ad nauseum , but I 'll limit my post to.....FUCK THAT .
Futurama will lose the vast majority of what it has built up over the years because those asinine morons at the network ca n't realize a potential major cash source.Good job FOX .
You are about to destroy something very valuable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.....And yet, FOX slaughters yet another potential cash cow.Honestly, what is with companies that take great ideas and totally ruin them in the name of "improving" them?I could talk about such epic fuck-ups ad nauseum, but I'll limit my post to.....FUCK THAT.
Futurama will lose the vast majority of what it has built up over the years because those asinine morons at the network can't realize a potential major cash source.Good job FOX.
You are about to destroy something very valuable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28745603</id>
	<title>IT Guy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247938920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've started a petition for anyone interested in signing!  http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/futuramarecast/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've started a petition for anyone interested in signing !
http : //www.petitionspot.com/petitions/futuramarecast/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've started a petition for anyone interested in signing!
http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/futuramarecast/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738361</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247852940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Farnsworth was known to say "Bad news, everyone" on occasion- like when the supercollider superexploded.</p></div><p>He has also occasionally used just "News, everyone!" when the news actually was good.</p><p>In later episodes however they played more off of his wandering mind to make the news have the illusion of good, while not having anything to do with the original bad news.</p><p>(Fry is presented with an egg-sized pill which will allow him to withstand the pressure underwater)<br>Fry:  Are you crazy?  I can't swallow that.<br>Professor:  Well, then good news! It's a suppository!</p><p>And then the good old expected  "Good news, everyone!  There's a report on the TV of some very bad news!"</p><p>A true nerd uses the exact saying from the episode closest to the context at hand<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Farnsworth was known to say " Bad news , everyone " on occasion- like when the supercollider superexploded.He has also occasionally used just " News , everyone !
" when the news actually was good.In later episodes however they played more off of his wandering mind to make the news have the illusion of good , while not having anything to do with the original bad news .
( Fry is presented with an egg-sized pill which will allow him to withstand the pressure underwater ) Fry : Are you crazy ?
I ca n't swallow that.Professor : Well , then good news !
It 's a suppository ! And then the good old expected " Good news , everyone !
There 's a report on the TV of some very bad news !
" A true nerd uses the exact saying from the episode closest to the context at hand : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Farnsworth was known to say "Bad news, everyone" on occasion- like when the supercollider superexploded.He has also occasionally used just "News, everyone!
" when the news actually was good.In later episodes however they played more off of his wandering mind to make the news have the illusion of good, while not having anything to do with the original bad news.
(Fry is presented with an egg-sized pill which will allow him to withstand the pressure underwater)Fry:  Are you crazy?
I can't swallow that.Professor:  Well, then good news!
It's a suppository!And then the good old expected  "Good news, everyone!
There's a report on the TV of some very bad news!
"A true nerd uses the exact saying from the episode closest to the context at hand :D
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737659</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736815</id>
	<title>Comentary</title>
	<author>Usually Unlucky </author>
	<datestamp>1247836680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext> During the commentary's for the both the movies and the season DVDs all the voice actors always said that it was their favorite show to work on. It was hard to tell if this was simply pandering but they sounded genuinely sincere. Especially Billy West and John DiMaggio who seemed to be to big fans of the show. And I don't think Katty Segal is being flooded with job offers. The only ones I see moving on are the greatly talented Maurice Lamarche and Tres McNeil who do a lot of work other than Futurama and only play secondary characters on the show.
Read More... 3 comments
top tags</htmltext>
<tokenext>During the commentary 's for the both the movies and the season DVDs all the voice actors always said that it was their favorite show to work on .
It was hard to tell if this was simply pandering but they sounded genuinely sincere .
Especially Billy West and John DiMaggio who seemed to be to big fans of the show .
And I do n't think Katty Segal is being flooded with job offers .
The only ones I see moving on are the greatly talented Maurice Lamarche and Tres McNeil who do a lot of work other than Futurama and only play secondary characters on the show .
Read More... 3 comments top tags</tokentext>
<sentencetext> During the commentary's for the both the movies and the season DVDs all the voice actors always said that it was their favorite show to work on.
It was hard to tell if this was simply pandering but they sounded genuinely sincere.
Especially Billy West and John DiMaggio who seemed to be to big fans of the show.
And I don't think Katty Segal is being flooded with job offers.
The only ones I see moving on are the greatly talented Maurice Lamarche and Tres McNeil who do a lot of work other than Futurama and only play secondary characters on the show.
Read More... 3 comments
top tags</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737711</id>
	<title>Re:Speech-to-text</title>
	<author>xbytor</author>
	<datestamp>1247844360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look at how well it worked for Chef on Southpark.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at how well it worked for Chef on Southpark .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at how well it worked for Chef on Southpark.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28744203</id>
	<title>The simpsons Wikipedia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247919480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Id like to just say if you the simpsons into wikipedia, you'll see the cast members have had three or four pay rises! Initially they were getting less than the Futurama guys!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Id like to just say if you the simpsons into wikipedia , you 'll see the cast members have had three or four pay rises !
Initially they were getting less than the Futurama guys !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Id like to just say if you the simpsons into wikipedia, you'll see the cast members have had three or four pay rises!
Initially they were getting less than the Futurama guys!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738119</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247849580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Bad news, everyone" preceded <b>good</b> news.  It's still you who needs to turn over your card...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Bad news , everyone " preceded good news .
It 's still you who needs to turn over your card.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Bad news, everyone" preceded good news.
It's still you who needs to turn over your card...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737659</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28744393</id>
	<title>Re:So how are they going to explain the new voices</title>
	<author>petermgreen</author>
	<datestamp>1247922720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>aren't you forgetting a rather well known british sci-fi series that has been changing the actor that plays it's main actor regulally since practially it's inception and has been going for so long that some of the early episodes have been lost.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>are n't you forgetting a rather well known british sci-fi series that has been changing the actor that plays it 's main actor regulally since practially it 's inception and has been going for so long that some of the early episodes have been lost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>aren't you forgetting a rather well known british sci-fi series that has been changing the actor that plays it's main actor regulally since practially it's inception and has been going for so long that some of the early episodes have been lost.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739735</id>
	<title>Re:Comentary</title>
	<author>Progman3K</author>
	<datestamp>1247920260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it's obvious that this story is pure shenanigans.<br>When Phil Hartman was killed, they retired all his Simpsons characters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's obvious that this story is pure shenanigans.When Phil Hartman was killed , they retired all his Simpsons characters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's obvious that this story is pure shenanigans.When Phil Hartman was killed, they retired all his Simpsons characters.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736815</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737233</id>
	<title>Re:Speech-to-text</title>
	<author>bertoelcon</author>
	<datestamp>1247840040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>On the one hand that is a good idea.<p>On the other hand the media corporations may use it as a way to copyright a voice, even in a way that the original actors themselves can't sound like that out of the contracted uses.</p><p>On a similar note does anyone own Darth Vader's breath sound effect?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the one hand that is a good idea.On the other hand the media corporations may use it as a way to copyright a voice , even in a way that the original actors themselves ca n't sound like that out of the contracted uses.On a similar note does anyone own Darth Vader 's breath sound effect ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the one hand that is a good idea.On the other hand the media corporations may use it as a way to copyright a voice, even in a way that the original actors themselves can't sound like that out of the contracted uses.On a similar note does anyone own Darth Vader's breath sound effect?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737279</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247840340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a piece of cake to bake a pretty <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61Qv\_8cFFbQ" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">cake</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a piece of cake to bake a pretty cake [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a piece of cake to bake a pretty cake [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737659</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>AdmiralXyz</author>
	<datestamp>1247843940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Farnsworth was known to say "Bad news, everyone" on occasion- like when the supercollider superexploded. Perhaps it is you who must hand over your card, hmm?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Farnsworth was known to say " Bad news , everyone " on occasion- like when the supercollider superexploded .
Perhaps it is you who must hand over your card , hmm ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Farnsworth was known to say "Bad news, everyone" on occasion- like when the supercollider superexploded.
Perhaps it is you who must hand over your card, hmm?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737325</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736841</id>
	<title>voices</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247836800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In just about every anime, cartoon series, and live-action where they've tried to swap one actor's voice for another, the series usually tanks not long after the switch is made. The only thing worse for a series is to get someone pregnant, involve a baby, or suddenly tack on a female lead or support role when one previously wasn't present. Or a consult with Joss Whedon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In just about every anime , cartoon series , and live-action where they 've tried to swap one actor 's voice for another , the series usually tanks not long after the switch is made .
The only thing worse for a series is to get someone pregnant , involve a baby , or suddenly tack on a female lead or support role when one previously was n't present .
Or a consult with Joss Whedon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In just about every anime, cartoon series, and live-action where they've tried to swap one actor's voice for another, the series usually tanks not long after the switch is made.
The only thing worse for a series is to get someone pregnant, involve a baby, or suddenly tack on a female lead or support role when one previously wasn't present.
Or a consult with Joss Whedon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28741451</id>
	<title>If I were them Id take the salary cut</title>
	<author>voss</author>
	<datestamp>1247937960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of  course with  increased points on the back-end, basically a increased cut of the gross from episode sales and merchandising from ALL futurama episodes not just the new ones.</p><p>New episodes with the original voice actors increases the value of the repeats.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course with increased points on the back-end , basically a increased cut of the gross from episode sales and merchandising from ALL futurama episodes not just the new ones.New episodes with the original voice actors increases the value of the repeats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of  course with  increased points on the back-end, basically a increased cut of the gross from episode sales and merchandising from ALL futurama episodes not just the new ones.New episodes with the original voice actors increases the value of the repeats.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737649</id>
	<title>So how are they going to explain the new voices</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247843880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>on the show? The crew gets into a horrible accident that requires them to get voice box transplants, and Bender's voice gets erased and he is programmed with a different one.</p><p>This is almost as bad in a TV series when an actor or actress is replaced with a different one, and it usually happens to Soap Operas and really Cheesy TV shows. The only TV show to do this on a regular basis and still survive was Saturday Night Live, who kept reinventing themselves with new comedians.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>on the show ?
The crew gets into a horrible accident that requires them to get voice box transplants , and Bender 's voice gets erased and he is programmed with a different one.This is almost as bad in a TV series when an actor or actress is replaced with a different one , and it usually happens to Soap Operas and really Cheesy TV shows .
The only TV show to do this on a regular basis and still survive was Saturday Night Live , who kept reinventing themselves with new comedians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>on the show?
The crew gets into a horrible accident that requires them to get voice box transplants, and Bender's voice gets erased and he is programmed with a different one.This is almost as bad in a TV series when an actor or actress is replaced with a different one, and it usually happens to Soap Operas and really Cheesy TV shows.
The only TV show to do this on a regular basis and still survive was Saturday Night Live, who kept reinventing themselves with new comedians.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737045</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>Kneo24</author>
	<datestamp>1247838240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the phrase: "Bite my glorious golden ass" is too far underused and would be more appropriate here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the phrase : " Bite my glorious golden ass " is too far underused and would be more appropriate here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the phrase: "Bite my glorious golden ass" is too far underused and would be more appropriate here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737453</id>
	<title>Severely-reduced pay</title>
	<author>keyboarderror</author>
	<datestamp>1247841840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Farnsworth: Well, it looks like I'll be needing my heroic bureaucrat back. At severely-reduced pay, of course.

[The staff cheer.]

LaBarbara: It's better than nothing.

Fry: What about me? Can I come back at severely-reduced pay?

Hermes: You got it, mon! In fact, severely-reduced pay all around!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Farnsworth : Well , it looks like I 'll be needing my heroic bureaucrat back .
At severely-reduced pay , of course .
[ The staff cheer .
] LaBarbara : It 's better than nothing .
Fry : What about me ?
Can I come back at severely-reduced pay ?
Hermes : You got it , mon !
In fact , severely-reduced pay all around !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Farnsworth: Well, it looks like I'll be needing my heroic bureaucrat back.
At severely-reduced pay, of course.
[The staff cheer.
]

LaBarbara: It's better than nothing.
Fry: What about me?
Can I come back at severely-reduced pay?
Hermes: You got it, mon!
In fact, severely-reduced pay all around!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737021</id>
	<title>Re:Why not just make them sound the same?</title>
	<author>The Pirou</author>
	<datestamp>1247838000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thank the discworld gawds I can read binary and didn't need to google 'binary conversion' to realize I was a geek. Normally I don't understand such simple things if people don't spell it our for me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank the discworld gawds I can read binary and did n't need to google 'binary conversion ' to realize I was a geek .
Normally I do n't understand such simple things if people do n't spell it our for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank the discworld gawds I can read binary and didn't need to google 'binary conversion' to realize I was a geek.
Normally I don't understand such simple things if people don't spell it our for me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737117</id>
	<title>Re:Other articles worthy of reading</title>
	<author>palndrumm</author>
	<datestamp>1247838840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another comment on the situation that's well worth reading:</p><p><a href="http://www.newsfromme.com/archives/2009\_07\_17.html#017446" title="newsfromme.com">http://www.newsfromme.com/archives/2009\_07\_17.html#017446</a> [newsfromme.com]</p><p>Most likely it's just Fox making some noise to try to get the cast to sign on without having to pay them more money than absolutely necessary, and if they were at all serious about replacing anyone they'd be doing it very quietly behind the scenes instead of making public announcements.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another comment on the situation that 's well worth reading : http : //www.newsfromme.com/archives/2009 \ _07 \ _17.html # 017446 [ newsfromme.com ] Most likely it 's just Fox making some noise to try to get the cast to sign on without having to pay them more money than absolutely necessary , and if they were at all serious about replacing anyone they 'd be doing it very quietly behind the scenes instead of making public announcements .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another comment on the situation that's well worth reading:http://www.newsfromme.com/archives/2009\_07\_17.html#017446 [newsfromme.com]Most likely it's just Fox making some noise to try to get the cast to sign on without having to pay them more money than absolutely necessary, and if they were at all serious about replacing anyone they'd be doing it very quietly behind the scenes instead of making public announcements.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28741169</id>
	<title>Re:Why not just make them sound the same?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247935440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>They wanted to change Venkman's voice to sound more like Bill Murray.  Of course, I don't understand why, as the characters weren't drawn to look anything like their movie counterparts.  I preferred Lorenzo Music as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They wanted to change Venkman 's voice to sound more like Bill Murray .
Of course , I do n't understand why , as the characters were n't drawn to look anything like their movie counterparts .
I preferred Lorenzo Music as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They wanted to change Venkman's voice to sound more like Bill Murray.
Of course, I don't understand why, as the characters weren't drawn to look anything like their movie counterparts.
I preferred Lorenzo Music as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738095</id>
	<title>Box Network</title>
	<author>KneelBeforeZod</author>
	<datestamp>1247849100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fox is still trying to kill Futurama... or keep it dead.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fox is still trying to kill Futurama... or keep it dead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fox is still trying to kill Futurama... or keep it dead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738937</id>
	<title>Great...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247949000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...it's <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sHSygCg9mY" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">wrong sounding Muppets</a> [youtube.com] all over again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...it 's wrong sounding Muppets [ youtube.com ] all over again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...it's wrong sounding Muppets [youtube.com] all over again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737107</id>
	<title>Re:Good news everybody!</title>
	<author>tunapez</author>
	<datestamp>1247838780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, I thought the the last 4 DVDs was a steady descent from it's glorious 4 seasons on the tube. I doubt any of the original flare will be restored from further meddling.
<br>
<br>
RIP Planet Express.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I thought the the last 4 DVDs was a steady descent from it 's glorious 4 seasons on the tube .
I doubt any of the original flare will be restored from further meddling .
RIP Planet Express .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I thought the the last 4 DVDs was a steady descent from it's glorious 4 seasons on the tube.
I doubt any of the original flare will be restored from further meddling.
RIP Planet Express.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736849</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737743</id>
	<title>Phony!</title>
	<author>RSKennan</author>
	<datestamp>1247844660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>99 to 1 odds that this is in fact *another* Fox negotiating stunt. A few years back, when Family Guy went off the air, they held a "contest" to find a new animated sitcom. Like a moron I entered with a friend. Our submission wasn't epic or anything, but they quietly sent it back to us. No new animated show came from the contest and then Family Guy came back with American Dad bringing up the rear (Now THAT'S a sitcom title: "Bringing up the Rear". It could be a family friendly spinoff of Assy Mcgee). The whole contest was PHONY. YOU'RE A PHONY, FOX NETWORK! HEY GUYS... THIS NETWORK'S A PHONY!


That said, I do a few voices, so let me review some old clips....</htmltext>
<tokenext>99 to 1 odds that this is in fact * another * Fox negotiating stunt .
A few years back , when Family Guy went off the air , they held a " contest " to find a new animated sitcom .
Like a moron I entered with a friend .
Our submission was n't epic or anything , but they quietly sent it back to us .
No new animated show came from the contest and then Family Guy came back with American Dad bringing up the rear ( Now THAT 'S a sitcom title : " Bringing up the Rear " .
It could be a family friendly spinoff of Assy Mcgee ) .
The whole contest was PHONY .
YOU 'RE A PHONY , FOX NETWORK !
HEY GUYS... THIS NETWORK 'S A PHONY !
That said , I do a few voices , so let me review some old clips... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>99 to 1 odds that this is in fact *another* Fox negotiating stunt.
A few years back, when Family Guy went off the air, they held a "contest" to find a new animated sitcom.
Like a moron I entered with a friend.
Our submission wasn't epic or anything, but they quietly sent it back to us.
No new animated show came from the contest and then Family Guy came back with American Dad bringing up the rear (Now THAT'S a sitcom title: "Bringing up the Rear".
It could be a family friendly spinoff of Assy Mcgee).
The whole contest was PHONY.
YOU'RE A PHONY, FOX NETWORK!
HEY GUYS... THIS NETWORK'S A PHONY!
That said, I do a few voices, so let me review some old clips....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28744459</id>
	<title>Re:</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1247923800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>Farnsworth was known to say "Bad news, everyone" on occasion- like when the supercollider superexploded. Perhaps it is you who must hand over your card, hmm?</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>Farnsworth was known to say " Bad news , everyone " on occasion- like when the supercollider superexploded .
Perhaps it is you who must hand over your card , hmm ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Farnsworth was known to say "Bad news, everyone" on occasion- like when the supercollider superexploded.
Perhaps it is you who must hand over your card, hmm?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737265</id>
	<title>Re:Good news everybody!</title>
	<author>Dachannien</author>
	<datestamp>1247840220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed.  When I watch my old Futurama DVDs, I more often than not watch with the commentary track turned on.  I swear I do have actual friends in real life, but those guys are kind of like the friends I never had.  There's no way in hell I'd bother watching if they're not involved.</p><p>For that matter, I thought the Transformers movie sucked because they didn't let Frank Welker provide Megatron's voice.  I mean, seriously, I can get Megan Fox pics on the Tubes - I don't need a crappy movie for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
When I watch my old Futurama DVDs , I more often than not watch with the commentary track turned on .
I swear I do have actual friends in real life , but those guys are kind of like the friends I never had .
There 's no way in hell I 'd bother watching if they 're not involved.For that matter , I thought the Transformers movie sucked because they did n't let Frank Welker provide Megatron 's voice .
I mean , seriously , I can get Megan Fox pics on the Tubes - I do n't need a crappy movie for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
When I watch my old Futurama DVDs, I more often than not watch with the commentary track turned on.
I swear I do have actual friends in real life, but those guys are kind of like the friends I never had.
There's no way in hell I'd bother watching if they're not involved.For that matter, I thought the Transformers movie sucked because they didn't let Frank Welker provide Megatron's voice.
I mean, seriously, I can get Megan Fox pics on the Tubes - I don't need a crappy movie for that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736849</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28741159</id>
	<title>Re:voices</title>
	<author>Digital Pizza</author>
	<datestamp>1247935380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think in this case it's more likely that potential fans were turned away from the show early on by those initial mediocre episodes, so that by the time the show got good, much of the audience was gone. Wouldn't be the first time that had happened.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think in this case it 's more likely that potential fans were turned away from the show early on by those initial mediocre episodes , so that by the time the show got good , much of the audience was gone .
Would n't be the first time that had happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think in this case it's more likely that potential fans were turned away from the show early on by those initial mediocre episodes, so that by the time the show got good, much of the audience was gone.
Wouldn't be the first time that had happened.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28743323</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>rantingkitten</author>
	<datestamp>1247910600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here are a few random ones culled from the front page right now:<br>
<br>
"nextweek", "!now", "!futon", "giveuswarrenspector", "games"
<br>
<br>
Yeah, I know that I'm just itching to read more about "not futon" or "not now".  And it's handy to be able to see more articles about "nextweek", too.  Perhaps "games", but then, if I wanted that there's an entire section devoted to it.<br>
<br>
I have to agree tags are unbelievably useless in general and on Slashdot specifically.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here are a few random ones culled from the front page right now : " nextweek " , " ! now " , " ! futon " , " giveuswarrenspector " , " games " Yeah , I know that I 'm just itching to read more about " not futon " or " not now " .
And it 's handy to be able to see more articles about " nextweek " , too .
Perhaps " games " , but then , if I wanted that there 's an entire section devoted to it .
I have to agree tags are unbelievably useless in general and on Slashdot specifically .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here are a few random ones culled from the front page right now:

"nextweek", "!now", "!futon", "giveuswarrenspector", "games"


Yeah, I know that I'm just itching to read more about "not futon" or "not now".
And it's handy to be able to see more articles about "nextweek", too.
Perhaps "games", but then, if I wanted that there's an entire section devoted to it.
I have to agree tags are unbelievably useless in general and on Slashdot specifically.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738933</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736827</id>
	<title>Bad news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247836680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just felt a great disturbance in the force...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just felt a great disturbance in the force.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just felt a great disturbance in the force...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737723</id>
	<title>Re:Good news everybody!</title>
	<author>The\_mad\_linguist</author>
	<datestamp>1247844420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, one of the reasons I like Futurama is that it has a cast of characters that are really likable, that the actors have invested a lot of time into making special.</p><p>And Zoidberg.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , one of the reasons I like Futurama is that it has a cast of characters that are really likable , that the actors have invested a lot of time into making special.And Zoidberg .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, one of the reasons I like Futurama is that it has a cast of characters that are really likable, that the actors have invested a lot of time into making special.And Zoidberg.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736849</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738471</id>
	<title>We have the technology.</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1247855340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Check out <a href="http://www.crypton.co.jp/mp/pages/prod/vocaloid/" title="crypton.co.jp">Vocaloid 2</a> [crypton.co.jp], the Japanese singing synthesizer.   This does a nice job.  Here's a <a href="http://www.crypton.co.jp/mp/pages/prod/vocaloid/cv03.jsp#" title="crypton.co.jp">sample.</a> [crypton.co.jp]
</p><p>
Setting up Vocaloid for a new voice is a big job; the current version requires that the performer sing a long, standardized set of training syllables.  Once you have the voice configured, you feed in a MIDI file with lyrics, pitch, and timing info, and singing or talking comes out.
</p><p>
Clearly, the next step is the ability to train the system from unstandardized speech and singing samples.  Once that technology is developed, it should be possible to automatically generated cover versions of any desired song with any desired performer. At last, the computer industry will be in a position to crush the RIAA.
</p><p>
(Remember, under US copyright law, anyone can make a cover version of any song and just pay the statutory royalty to the songwriter, a modest fee.  <i>The songwriter cannot refuse.)</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Check out Vocaloid 2 [ crypton.co.jp ] , the Japanese singing synthesizer .
This does a nice job .
Here 's a sample .
[ crypton.co.jp ] Setting up Vocaloid for a new voice is a big job ; the current version requires that the performer sing a long , standardized set of training syllables .
Once you have the voice configured , you feed in a MIDI file with lyrics , pitch , and timing info , and singing or talking comes out .
Clearly , the next step is the ability to train the system from unstandardized speech and singing samples .
Once that technology is developed , it should be possible to automatically generated cover versions of any desired song with any desired performer .
At last , the computer industry will be in a position to crush the RIAA .
( Remember , under US copyright law , anyone can make a cover version of any song and just pay the statutory royalty to the songwriter , a modest fee .
The songwriter can not refuse .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Check out Vocaloid 2 [crypton.co.jp], the Japanese singing synthesizer.
This does a nice job.
Here's a sample.
[crypton.co.jp]

Setting up Vocaloid for a new voice is a big job; the current version requires that the performer sing a long, standardized set of training syllables.
Once you have the voice configured, you feed in a MIDI file with lyrics, pitch, and timing info, and singing or talking comes out.
Clearly, the next step is the ability to train the system from unstandardized speech and singing samples.
Once that technology is developed, it should be possible to automatically generated cover versions of any desired song with any desired performer.
At last, the computer industry will be in a position to crush the RIAA.
(Remember, under US copyright law, anyone can make a cover version of any song and just pay the statutory royalty to the songwriter, a modest fee.
The songwriter cannot refuse.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738153</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>myrdos2</author>
	<datestamp>1247850240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good news everyone - there's some bad news on the TV!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good news everyone - there 's some bad news on the TV !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good news everyone - there's some bad news on the TV!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737659</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740901</id>
	<title>Re:So how are they going to explain the new voices</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247933280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ahem...  Dr Who?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahem... Dr Who ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahem...  Dr Who?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738251</id>
	<title>Re:Not watching without original cast.</title>
	<author>Col. Klink (retired)</author>
	<datestamp>1247851380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if John Kricfalusi will audition?</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; -- Still bitter about Billy West taking over the voice of Ren.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if John Kricfalusi will audition ?
    -- Still bitter about Billy West taking over the voice of Ren .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if John Kricfalusi will audition?
    -- Still bitter about Billy West taking over the voice of Ren.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736823</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737985</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>Burning1</author>
	<datestamp>1247847960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'Bad news, everyone' usually implied something that impacted Farnsworth himself, or news that the crew would not be sent on some suicidal task.</p><p>If it sucked for someone else, it was usually good news.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'Bad news , everyone ' usually implied something that impacted Farnsworth himself , or news that the crew would not be sent on some suicidal task.If it sucked for someone else , it was usually good news .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Bad news, everyone' usually implied something that impacted Farnsworth himself, or news that the crew would not be sent on some suicidal task.If it sucked for someone else, it was usually good news.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737659</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28908959</id>
	<title>Re:Zapp Brannigan!</title>
	<author>cpricejones</author>
	<datestamp>1249144020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>just in case you have never heard of the hypnotoad: www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiVYjRbZMe0
<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... easily my favorite random alien in the series</htmltext>
<tokenext>just in case you have never heard of the hypnotoad : www.youtube.com/watch ? v = kiVYjRbZMe0 ... easily my favorite random alien in the series</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just in case you have never heard of the hypnotoad: www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiVYjRbZMe0
  ... easily my favorite random alien in the series</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739625</id>
	<title>What's wrong with that?</title>
	<author>redblue</author>
	<datestamp>1247918340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not as if they will incur the wrath of Xenu if Bender joins an adventure club.<br>Personally, I would like to see some more changes. Too many dysfunctional Euro-Alien-Robot relationships. How about replacing them with a nice healthy nuclear North American family? With income derived from providing a non-fossil fuel based energy. And get rid of those robots, we need more diverse ethnic types for comic relief. And tone down all that unrealistic slapstick stuff. In fact, set the whole show in present day, not a thousand years from now. It might offend people living a 1000 light years from here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not as if they will incur the wrath of Xenu if Bender joins an adventure club.Personally , I would like to see some more changes .
Too many dysfunctional Euro-Alien-Robot relationships .
How about replacing them with a nice healthy nuclear North American family ?
With income derived from providing a non-fossil fuel based energy .
And get rid of those robots , we need more diverse ethnic types for comic relief .
And tone down all that unrealistic slapstick stuff .
In fact , set the whole show in present day , not a thousand years from now .
It might offend people living a 1000 light years from here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not as if they will incur the wrath of Xenu if Bender joins an adventure club.Personally, I would like to see some more changes.
Too many dysfunctional Euro-Alien-Robot relationships.
How about replacing them with a nice healthy nuclear North American family?
With income derived from providing a non-fossil fuel based energy.
And get rid of those robots, we need more diverse ethnic types for comic relief.
And tone down all that unrealistic slapstick stuff.
In fact, set the whole show in present day, not a thousand years from now.
It might offend people living a 1000 light years from here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737129</id>
	<title>Hmm</title>
	<author>Cloud K</author>
	<datestamp>1247838960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It just won't be right without Wakka as Bender<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It just wo n't be right without Wakka as Bender : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It just won't be right without Wakka as Bender :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28744713</id>
	<title>Re:Not watching without original cast.</title>
	<author>greyhueofdoubt</author>
	<datestamp>1247926680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The voices are fantastic, but I watch Futurama because it has some of the best writers working in animation. Seriously, when a show is that PhD- and Master's-heavy, AND they're all huge nerds, the show just has to be great.</p><p>All of the writers are probably still working separately on various projects, but Futurama let them all work *together* on something exponentially better than the sum of its parts.</p><p>-b</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The voices are fantastic , but I watch Futurama because it has some of the best writers working in animation .
Seriously , when a show is that PhD- and Master 's-heavy , AND they 're all huge nerds , the show just has to be great.All of the writers are probably still working separately on various projects , but Futurama let them all work * together * on something exponentially better than the sum of its parts.-b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The voices are fantastic, but I watch Futurama because it has some of the best writers working in animation.
Seriously, when a show is that PhD- and Master's-heavy, AND they're all huge nerds, the show just has to be great.All of the writers are probably still working separately on various projects, but Futurama let them all work *together* on something exponentially better than the sum of its parts.-b</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736823</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28745235</id>
	<title>Re:voices</title>
	<author>Rambling Paladin</author>
	<datestamp>1247934420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How does that follow?  If these folks are to believed, then the show was mediocre for the first five episodes.  If anything, this speaks well of most people because they know better than to keep watching something that is demonstrably uninteresting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How does that follow ?
If these folks are to believed , then the show was mediocre for the first five episodes .
If anything , this speaks well of most people because they know better than to keep watching something that is demonstrably uninteresting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does that follow?
If these folks are to believed, then the show was mediocre for the first five episodes.
If anything, this speaks well of most people because they know better than to keep watching something that is demonstrably uninteresting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739211</id>
	<title>Re:Speech-to-text</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247910780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now children...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now children.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now children...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737209</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738589</id>
	<title>Re:Speech-to-text</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247857800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the same way you can't use an actor's appearance without paying them or at least getting a contract saying you can use their appearance (barring parodies) I'm pretty sure you can't use someones voice for a show without paying them.</p><p>Now, if you create a completely synthesized cast from the get-go, who knows!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the same way you ca n't use an actor 's appearance without paying them or at least getting a contract saying you can use their appearance ( barring parodies ) I 'm pretty sure you ca n't use someones voice for a show without paying them.Now , if you create a completely synthesized cast from the get-go , who knows !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the same way you can't use an actor's appearance without paying them or at least getting a contract saying you can use their appearance (barring parodies) I'm pretty sure you can't use someones voice for a show without paying them.Now, if you create a completely synthesized cast from the get-go, who knows!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736849</id>
	<title>Good news everybody!</title>
	<author>dancingmad</author>
	<datestamp>1247836980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait, this isn't good news at all.</p><p>Seriously, the voice actors in Futurama gave their characters heart and soul.  It's not just that the actors are good (they are, of course) but the characters have grown along with the actors, such that in my mind, and in the mind of many fans I am sure, the two are inseparable.</p><p>Without the original cast, I won't be watching, simple as that.<br>It's going to cost more money in the long run to produce an abject failure than to put more money into the show from the start and hoping the fanbase comes back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait , this is n't good news at all.Seriously , the voice actors in Futurama gave their characters heart and soul .
It 's not just that the actors are good ( they are , of course ) but the characters have grown along with the actors , such that in my mind , and in the mind of many fans I am sure , the two are inseparable.Without the original cast , I wo n't be watching , simple as that.It 's going to cost more money in the long run to produce an abject failure than to put more money into the show from the start and hoping the fanbase comes back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait, this isn't good news at all.Seriously, the voice actors in Futurama gave their characters heart and soul.
It's not just that the actors are good (they are, of course) but the characters have grown along with the actors, such that in my mind, and in the mind of many fans I am sure, the two are inseparable.Without the original cast, I won't be watching, simple as that.It's going to cost more money in the long run to produce an abject failure than to put more money into the show from the start and hoping the fanbase comes back.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736811</id>
	<title>Other articles worthy of reading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247836680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want to point people to the following articles as well:</p><ol> <li> <a href="http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/2008-12-6-the-fien-print/posts/2009-7-17-clarification-on-the-futurama-recasting-reports" title="hitfix.com">http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/2008-12-6-the-fien-print/posts/2009-7-17-clarification-on-the-futurama-recasting-reports</a> [hitfix.com] </li><li> <a href="http://voiceactors.wordpress.com/2009/07/17/fox-attempting-to-recast-futurama/" title="wordpress.com">http://voiceactors.wordpress.com/2009/07/17/fox-attempting-to-recast-futurama/</a> [wordpress.com] </li></ol><p>Both making very compelling cases.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to point people to the following articles as well : http : //www.hitfix.com/blogs/2008-12-6-the-fien-print/posts/2009-7-17-clarification-on-the-futurama-recasting-reports [ hitfix.com ] http : //voiceactors.wordpress.com/2009/07/17/fox-attempting-to-recast-futurama/ [ wordpress.com ] Both making very compelling cases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to point people to the following articles as well:  http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/2008-12-6-the-fien-print/posts/2009-7-17-clarification-on-the-futurama-recasting-reports [hitfix.com]  http://voiceactors.wordpress.com/2009/07/17/fox-attempting-to-recast-futurama/ [wordpress.com] Both making very compelling cases.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737325</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>Blue Stone</author>
	<datestamp>1247840760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love how the 'goodnewseveryone' tag is being negated - and replaced by 'badnewseveryone' - by people who obviously don't understand that the phrase is supposed to be ironic and prescient of bad news.</p><p>Hand your nerd cards in at the door, please. You know who you are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love how the 'goodnewseveryone ' tag is being negated - and replaced by 'badnewseveryone ' - by people who obviously do n't understand that the phrase is supposed to be ironic and prescient of bad news.Hand your nerd cards in at the door , please .
You know who you are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love how the 'goodnewseveryone' tag is being negated - and replaced by 'badnewseveryone' - by people who obviously don't understand that the phrase is supposed to be ironic and prescient of bad news.Hand your nerd cards in at the door, please.
You know who you are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737543</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>gurps\_npc</author>
	<datestamp>1247842800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That was not insightful.  Did you not read that they are re-casting the voices.
<p>Try again like this:</p><p>

Bite my shiny metal ARSE.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was not insightful .
Did you not read that they are re-casting the voices .
Try again like this : Bite my shiny metal ARSE .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was not insightful.
Did you not read that they are re-casting the voices.
Try again like this:

Bite my shiny metal ARSE.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738425</id>
	<title>Re:Obviously...</title>
	<author>MickyTheIdiot</author>
	<datestamp>1247854140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>thanks.  The haunting "Torgo Theme" is back in my head.</p><p>It only took 10 years to get rid of it the first time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>thanks .
The haunting " Torgo Theme " is back in my head.It only took 10 years to get rid of it the first time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thanks.
The haunting "Torgo Theme" is back in my head.It only took 10 years to get rid of it the first time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736919</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736825</id>
	<title>Why not just make them sound the same?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247836680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, when a new voice appears on an old show playing an existing character (memory escapes me at this moment for an example, but I know this has happened), I always wonder why folks generally don't just make the new voice sound like the old voice.  This happened to at least a couple childhood cartoons of mine - the voice suddenly changed and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... WTF?  <br> <br>
Let's hope they decide to bring in folks that sound the same (or very similar) if they do recast.  Having different voices would be pretty lame.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , when a new voice appears on an old show playing an existing character ( memory escapes me at this moment for an example , but I know this has happened ) , I always wonder why folks generally do n't just make the new voice sound like the old voice .
This happened to at least a couple childhood cartoons of mine - the voice suddenly changed and ... WTF ? Let 's hope they decide to bring in folks that sound the same ( or very similar ) if they do recast .
Having different voices would be pretty lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, when a new voice appears on an old show playing an existing character (memory escapes me at this moment for an example, but I know this has happened), I always wonder why folks generally don't just make the new voice sound like the old voice.
This happened to at least a couple childhood cartoons of mine - the voice suddenly changed and ... WTF?   
Let's hope they decide to bring in folks that sound the same (or very similar) if they do recast.
Having different voices would be pretty lame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737497</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>sharperguy</author>
	<datestamp>1247842320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congratulations, you have the job!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations , you have the job !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations, you have the job!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737473</id>
	<title>Tall Tell Sign</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1247842080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> However, some are skeptical about whether it's a real casting call or purely a stunt to reduce the salaries of the voice actors."</p></div></blockquote><p>If they all have East Indian accents, then the question is answered.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>However , some are skeptical about whether it 's a real casting call or purely a stunt to reduce the salaries of the voice actors .
" If they all have East Indian accents , then the question is answered .
     </tokentext>
<sentencetext> However, some are skeptical about whether it's a real casting call or purely a stunt to reduce the salaries of the voice actors.
"If they all have East Indian accents, then the question is answered.
     
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736809</id>
	<title>Idea</title>
	<author>Brian Gordon</author>
	<datestamp>1247836620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How effective would it be if thousands of fans submitted MP3 via email stating, "Leave the cast alone!" in varying degrees of passion and vernacular?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How effective would it be if thousands of fans submitted MP3 via email stating , " Leave the cast alone !
" in varying degrees of passion and vernacular ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How effective would it be if thousands of fans submitted MP3 via email stating, "Leave the cast alone!
" in varying degrees of passion and vernacular?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28742131</id>
	<title>Re:Why not just make them sound the same?</title>
	<author>ari\_j</author>
	<datestamp>1247943420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Example of that for you: Meg Griffin.
<br> <br>
But what you're suggesting doesn't recognize that voices are unique and that Futurama had several of the best voice actors since Mel Blanc.  There simply are not people capable of perfectly replicating every voice that Billy West, John DiMaggio, Maurice LeMarche, etc. used in Futurama.  This is especially true when you look at how the actors developed their characters' voices, inflections, speech rhythms, and so on as the series progressed.
<br> <br>
Futurama without at least Billy West and John DiMaggio is not Futurama.  Those two brought too much to the show independent of the writing and directing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Example of that for you : Meg Griffin .
But what you 're suggesting does n't recognize that voices are unique and that Futurama had several of the best voice actors since Mel Blanc .
There simply are not people capable of perfectly replicating every voice that Billy West , John DiMaggio , Maurice LeMarche , etc .
used in Futurama .
This is especially true when you look at how the actors developed their characters ' voices , inflections , speech rhythms , and so on as the series progressed .
Futurama without at least Billy West and John DiMaggio is not Futurama .
Those two brought too much to the show independent of the writing and directing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Example of that for you: Meg Griffin.
But what you're suggesting doesn't recognize that voices are unique and that Futurama had several of the best voice actors since Mel Blanc.
There simply are not people capable of perfectly replicating every voice that Billy West, John DiMaggio, Maurice LeMarche, etc.
used in Futurama.
This is especially true when you look at how the actors developed their characters' voices, inflections, speech rhythms, and so on as the series progressed.
Futurama without at least Billy West and John DiMaggio is not Futurama.
Those two brought too much to the show independent of the writing and directing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737195</id>
	<title>Re:Speech-to-text</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247839680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I rather suspect "the return of chef" is about as good as it gets without reusing entire phrases way too often.  (I mean obviously "good news, everyone!" won't sound wrong, but any sentence that hasn't been uttered in its entierty before will at least take quite a bit of human time to modulate correctly and even then sound subtly wrong).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I rather suspect " the return of chef " is about as good as it gets without reusing entire phrases way too often .
( I mean obviously " good news , everyone !
" wo n't sound wrong , but any sentence that has n't been uttered in its entierty before will at least take quite a bit of human time to modulate correctly and even then sound subtly wrong ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I rather suspect "the return of chef" is about as good as it gets without reusing entire phrases way too often.
(I mean obviously "good news, everyone!
" won't sound wrong, but any sentence that hasn't been uttered in its entierty before will at least take quite a bit of human time to modulate correctly and even then sound subtly wrong).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737127</id>
	<title>Casting notice</title>
	<author>HumanEmulator</author>
	<datestamp>1247838900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I work in the business and I saw a casting notice for this go out yesterday. Right now (if you're a member) you can see the notice on a site called Actor's Access <a href="http://www.actorsaccess.com/projects/?view=breakdowns&amp;breakdown=191549" title="actorsaccess.com">here</a> [actorsaccess.com] and the sides are up on <a href="http://www.showfax.com/role\_selection.cfm?l=2&amp;t=1&amp;p=101911" title="showfax.com">Showfax</a> [showfax.com].</p><p>Casting notices for shows like this almost never appear on a site like that (it's a step above Craigslist), so my best guess this is a negotiation tactic to convince the cast to accept contracts that pay less, in line with the reduced budget for the show.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I work in the business and I saw a casting notice for this go out yesterday .
Right now ( if you 're a member ) you can see the notice on a site called Actor 's Access here [ actorsaccess.com ] and the sides are up on Showfax [ showfax.com ] .Casting notices for shows like this almost never appear on a site like that ( it 's a step above Craigslist ) , so my best guess this is a negotiation tactic to convince the cast to accept contracts that pay less , in line with the reduced budget for the show .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I work in the business and I saw a casting notice for this go out yesterday.
Right now (if you're a member) you can see the notice on a site called Actor's Access here [actorsaccess.com] and the sides are up on Showfax [showfax.com].Casting notices for shows like this almost never appear on a site like that (it's a step above Craigslist), so my best guess this is a negotiation tactic to convince the cast to accept contracts that pay less, in line with the reduced budget for the show.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737917</id>
	<title>Re:Speech-to-text</title>
	<author>chill</author>
	<datestamp>1247847060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You aren't a big South Park far, are you?</p><p>If you were, you'd instantly think of the episode where Chef becomes a pedophile and is killed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are n't a big South Park far , are you ? If you were , you 'd instantly think of the episode where Chef becomes a pedophile and is killed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You aren't a big South Park far, are you?If you were, you'd instantly think of the episode where Chef becomes a pedophile and is killed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28743891</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1247915760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's Comic Book Guy.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's Comic Book Guy .
: -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's Comic Book Guy.
:-P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738665</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738933</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247948940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who cares what the tags say?  Are you serious?  Tags in general have debatable utility, but around here, what good are they?<br>
<br>
Take a look at the "tags" around here.  Assume I could click on them to find more stories with those tags -- oh, I can't.  I click on them and NOTHING HAPPENS.<br>
<br>
But let's assume I could.  Typical tags are "haha", "whocares", "ohno", or crap like "badidea", "goodidea", and so forth.  Who the HELL actually says, "Gee, I want to read more stories on the subject of 'haha', I'll just click on that... there we go..."<br>
<br>
Forget tags.  They are useless in general, and slashdot's implentation of them is doubly useless.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who cares what the tags say ?
Are you serious ?
Tags in general have debatable utility , but around here , what good are they ?
Take a look at the " tags " around here .
Assume I could click on them to find more stories with those tags -- oh , I ca n't .
I click on them and NOTHING HAPPENS .
But let 's assume I could .
Typical tags are " haha " , " whocares " , " ohno " , or crap like " badidea " , " goodidea " , and so forth .
Who the HELL actually says , " Gee , I want to read more stories on the subject of 'haha ' , I 'll just click on that... there we go... " Forget tags .
They are useless in general , and slashdot 's implentation of them is doubly useless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who cares what the tags say?
Are you serious?
Tags in general have debatable utility, but around here, what good are they?
Take a look at the "tags" around here.
Assume I could click on them to find more stories with those tags -- oh, I can't.
I click on them and NOTHING HAPPENS.
But let's assume I could.
Typical tags are "haha", "whocares", "ohno", or crap like "badidea", "goodidea", and so forth.
Who the HELL actually says, "Gee, I want to read more stories on the subject of 'haha', I'll just click on that... there we go..."

Forget tags.
They are useless in general, and slashdot's implentation of them is doubly useless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737325</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740365</id>
	<title>Re:Why not just make them sound the same?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247928600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you seriously have that little respect for the voice actors? You think you can really find someone who can replace Billy West, doing accurate imitations of Fry, Zoidberg, and the Professor? Fuck off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you seriously have that little respect for the voice actors ?
You think you can really find someone who can replace Billy West , doing accurate imitations of Fry , Zoidberg , and the Professor ?
Fuck off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you seriously have that little respect for the voice actors?
You think you can really find someone who can replace Billy West, doing accurate imitations of Fry, Zoidberg, and the Professor?
Fuck off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737785</id>
	<title>Opportunity for improvement</title>
	<author>absoluteflatness</author>
	<datestamp>1247845140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe this (or the more normal work schedule of a normal series rather than the "movies"), will get some of the voice actors to return to their original form.</p><p>I think that some of the actors (particuarly Phil LaMarr, interestingly) never quite got the hang of their old characters again.</p><p>Losing the old cast would still be a death blow to the show, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe this ( or the more normal work schedule of a normal series rather than the " movies " ) , will get some of the voice actors to return to their original form.I think that some of the actors ( particuarly Phil LaMarr , interestingly ) never quite got the hang of their old characters again.Losing the old cast would still be a death blow to the show , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe this (or the more normal work schedule of a normal series rather than the "movies"), will get some of the voice actors to return to their original form.I think that some of the actors (particuarly Phil LaMarr, interestingly) never quite got the hang of their old characters again.Losing the old cast would still be a death blow to the show, though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28744725</id>
	<title>Re:Why not just make them sound the same?</title>
	<author>greyhueofdoubt</author>
	<datestamp>1247926800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Running gag on MST3K (can't remember which episode this was; it was when Mike turned into a crow-bot and received advice from crow):</p><p>"...And every four years, your voice will inexplicably change..."</p><p>You can turn it into something funny or you can act ashamed of it and get canceled. Voice change is not a death sentence for a show.</p><p>-b</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Running gag on MST3K ( ca n't remember which episode this was ; it was when Mike turned into a crow-bot and received advice from crow ) : " ...And every four years , your voice will inexplicably change... " You can turn it into something funny or you can act ashamed of it and get canceled .
Voice change is not a death sentence for a show.-b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Running gag on MST3K (can't remember which episode this was; it was when Mike turned into a crow-bot and received advice from crow):"...And every four years, your voice will inexplicably change..."You can turn it into something funny or you can act ashamed of it and get canceled.
Voice change is not a death sentence for a show.-b</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737875</id>
	<title>Really? What about Homer Simpson?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247846400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Listen to the first season? His voice is more deeper and sad sack sounding, compared to the zanier version we all know. Which would you rather have?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Listen to the first season ?
His voice is more deeper and sad sack sounding , compared to the zanier version we all know .
Which would you rather have ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Listen to the first season?
His voice is more deeper and sad sack sounding, compared to the zanier version we all know.
Which would you rather have?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736983</id>
	<title>Re:Why not just make them sound the same?</title>
	<author>Goldberg's Pants</author>
	<datestamp>1247837760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Funny timing for this as I've introduced my kids to The Real Ghostbusters, a show where both Venkman and Janine's voices changed.</p><p>Venkman sounds like someone doing a very bad immitation of Lorenzo Music (which of course they are) whereas Janine's voice (the lovely Kath Soucie) is actually MUCH better as it's not as squeaky in the "channeling Annie Potts" way the former one was.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny timing for this as I 've introduced my kids to The Real Ghostbusters , a show where both Venkman and Janine 's voices changed.Venkman sounds like someone doing a very bad immitation of Lorenzo Music ( which of course they are ) whereas Janine 's voice ( the lovely Kath Soucie ) is actually MUCH better as it 's not as squeaky in the " channeling Annie Potts " way the former one was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny timing for this as I've introduced my kids to The Real Ghostbusters, a show where both Venkman and Janine's voices changed.Venkman sounds like someone doing a very bad immitation of Lorenzo Music (which of course they are) whereas Janine's voice (the lovely Kath Soucie) is actually MUCH better as it's not as squeaky in the "channeling Annie Potts" way the former one was.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737897</id>
	<title>Re:ob</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247846700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not true.  It's usually good news from Professor Farnsworth's point of view (although bad for the crew).  I recall once when it was undeniably bad news for him also, he simply said "News, everyone!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not true .
It 's usually good news from Professor Farnsworth 's point of view ( although bad for the crew ) .
I recall once when it was undeniably bad news for him also , he simply said " News , everyone !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not true.
It's usually good news from Professor Farnsworth's point of view (although bad for the crew).
I recall once when it was undeniably bad news for him also, he simply said "News, everyone!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737325</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737323</id>
	<title>Re:Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247840760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hate fox as much as the next guy *shed's a tear for firefly*, but isn't it possible that the voice actors are asking for too much, at the end of the day its the writers that make the show great (well the animators add little details in the background too) and while the voices are important, they <b>may</b> be letting it go to their heads. TBH i don't know, you don't know, all we know is fox don't want to pay the voice actors what they want!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate fox as much as the next guy * shed 's a tear for firefly * , but is n't it possible that the voice actors are asking for too much , at the end of the day its the writers that make the show great ( well the animators add little details in the background too ) and while the voices are important , they may be letting it go to their heads .
TBH i do n't know , you do n't know , all we know is fox do n't want to pay the voice actors what they want !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate fox as much as the next guy *shed's a tear for firefly*, but isn't it possible that the voice actors are asking for too much, at the end of the day its the writers that make the show great (well the animators add little details in the background too) and while the voices are important, they may be letting it go to their heads.
TBH i don't know, you don't know, all we know is fox don't want to pay the voice actors what they want!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736809</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736823</id>
	<title>Not watching without original cast.</title>
	<author>Gudeldar</author>
	<datestamp>1247836680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I absolutely will NOT watch it without the original cast. I can't imagine anyone other than Billy West voicing Fry.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I absolutely will NOT watch it without the original cast .
I ca n't imagine anyone other than Billy West voicing Fry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I absolutely will NOT watch it without the original cast.
I can't imagine anyone other than Billy West voicing Fry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738249</id>
	<title>Having drank with Bender before....</title>
	<author>Jager Dave</author>
	<datestamp>1247851380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...many moons ago, I cannot see DiMaggio demanding $75k PER SHOW...  The man was a really nice guy.  We used to hang out at the same pub in Hollywood...

In the unlikely event John (or one of his friends) is reading this.... Jager Dave from BB says hey<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>...many moons ago , I can not see DiMaggio demanding $ 75k PER SHOW... The man was a really nice guy .
We used to hang out at the same pub in Hollywood.. . In the unlikely event John ( or one of his friends ) is reading this.... Jager Dave from BB says hey : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...many moons ago, I cannot see DiMaggio demanding $75k PER SHOW...  The man was a really nice guy.
We used to hang out at the same pub in Hollywood...

In the unlikely event John (or one of his friends) is reading this.... Jager Dave from BB says hey :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737021
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28745345
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737233
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28743323
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736809
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737323
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739247
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28742131
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28744393
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736809
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737931
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738925
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737529
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738675
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736823
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738251
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738753
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740859
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736849
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737723
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737917
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738443
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736809
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739937
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738195
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738589
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28745235
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28741159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740633
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736815
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739957
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28741977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738865
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737969
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736919
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738425
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740901
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737897
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736823
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28744713
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737279
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737543
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737497
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738665
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28743891
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740365
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736815
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739735
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738361
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736849
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737265
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736809
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737023
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736823
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28741941
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736809
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737073
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737209
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739211
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738851
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28908959
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736849
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737107
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740439
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737321
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28744725
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736823
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737195
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_2257212_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28741169
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736825
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737021
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28742131
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736983
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28741169
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28744725
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740365
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738851
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737381
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28908959
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738675
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736811
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737117
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737321
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738753
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740859
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737129
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737017
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738471
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738589
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737233
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737917
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737195
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738751
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740633
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737209
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737711
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738865
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736815
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739735
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737715
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736919
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738425
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736849
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737107
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737265
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737723
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740901
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738195
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28744393
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28745345
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738443
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737969
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740187
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736841
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737597
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739159
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28745235
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28741159
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736807
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737543
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737279
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737497
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737529
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737325
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737897
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28741977
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737659
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739247
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739957
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737985
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738361
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738153
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738119
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738665
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28743891
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28739937
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738933
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28740439
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28743323
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737045
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736853
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28744203
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736809
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737073
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737781
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737931
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738925
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737323
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737023
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737015
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737473
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736823
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28744713
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738251
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736889
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28738307
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28741941
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737053
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28737307
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_2257212.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_2257212.28736971
</commentlist>
</conversation>
