<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_17_1231204</id>
	<title>Cure For Radiation Sickness Found?</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1247837880000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Summit writes <i>"A scientist has claimed to have discovered a <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3748014,00.html">radioprotectant that all but eliminates acute radiation sickness</a> even in cases of lethal doses of radiation in tests on rats and monkeys, when injected up to 72 hours after exposure. They also claim the drug, a protein, has no observed negative effects in humans. They have not irradiated any people just yet, but if this turns out to be true, it could mean everything from curing cancer to making manned interplanetary space expeditions feasible... not to mention treatment for radiation exposures in nuclear/radiological accidents/attacks. If this drug works, it would mean a true breakthrough as past experiments with radioprotectants were not particularly promising in any respect."</i> The only source for the story at this time is an exclusive in YNet News, a site with the subtitle "Israel At Your Fingertips." Such a radioprotectant would be huge news for Israel. Make of it what you will.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Summit writes " A scientist has claimed to have discovered a radioprotectant that all but eliminates acute radiation sickness even in cases of lethal doses of radiation in tests on rats and monkeys , when injected up to 72 hours after exposure .
They also claim the drug , a protein , has no observed negative effects in humans .
They have not irradiated any people just yet , but if this turns out to be true , it could mean everything from curing cancer to making manned interplanetary space expeditions feasible... not to mention treatment for radiation exposures in nuclear/radiological accidents/attacks .
If this drug works , it would mean a true breakthrough as past experiments with radioprotectants were not particularly promising in any respect .
" The only source for the story at this time is an exclusive in YNet News , a site with the subtitle " Israel At Your Fingertips .
" Such a radioprotectant would be huge news for Israel .
Make of it what you will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Summit writes "A scientist has claimed to have discovered a radioprotectant that all but eliminates acute radiation sickness even in cases of lethal doses of radiation in tests on rats and monkeys, when injected up to 72 hours after exposure.
They also claim the drug, a protein, has no observed negative effects in humans.
They have not irradiated any people just yet, but if this turns out to be true, it could mean everything from curing cancer to making manned interplanetary space expeditions feasible... not to mention treatment for radiation exposures in nuclear/radiological accidents/attacks.
If this drug works, it would mean a true breakthrough as past experiments with radioprotectants were not particularly promising in any respect.
" The only source for the story at this time is an exclusive in YNet News, a site with the subtitle "Israel At Your Fingertips.
" Such a radioprotectant would be huge news for Israel.
Make of it what you will.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729355</id>
	<title>Homepage and older info</title>
	<author>yogibaer</author>
	<datestamp>1247843520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They have a homepage with a bio of Dr. Gudkov (look under "Board of Directors" <a href="http://www.cbiolabs.com/" title="cbiolabs.com">http://www.cbiolabs.com/</a> [cbiolabs.com]  and they obviously have been working on this for some time and are now in clinical trials: 2007: <a href="http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/811854/cleveland\_biolabs\_chief\_scientist\_andrei\_gudkov\_discusses\_recent\_stem\_cell/index.html" title="redorbit.com">http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/811854/cleveland\_biolabs\_chief\_scientist\_andrei\_gudkov\_discusses\_recent\_stem\_cell/index.html</a> [redorbit.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>They have a homepage with a bio of Dr. Gudkov ( look under " Board of Directors " http : //www.cbiolabs.com/ [ cbiolabs.com ] and they obviously have been working on this for some time and are now in clinical trials : 2007 : http : //www.redorbit.com/news/health/811854/cleveland \ _biolabs \ _chief \ _scientist \ _andrei \ _gudkov \ _discusses \ _recent \ _stem \ _cell/index.html [ redorbit.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They have a homepage with a bio of Dr. Gudkov (look under "Board of Directors" http://www.cbiolabs.com/ [cbiolabs.com]  and they obviously have been working on this for some time and are now in clinical trials: 2007: http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/811854/cleveland\_biolabs\_chief\_scientist\_andrei\_gudkov\_discusses\_recent\_stem\_cell/index.html [redorbit.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729409</id>
	<title>Re:72 hours after exposure?</title>
	<author>GargamelSpaceman</author>
	<datestamp>1247843700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>No. According to TFA, your DNA is still ripped to shreds, but the drug supresses your cells' suicide mechanism that having 'corrupted data' in the DNA activated.  The suicide mechanism helps keep damaged cells from becoming cancerous cells.  Instead they become dead cells.    In the case of lethal radiation poisoning, this happens to too many cells.  Now, your cells already do have mechanisms to repair DNA damage.  If something seems out of place, they can often make the right guess as to how to patch things back together.  There are corrupt hard drive repair utilities that do this too.  But sometimes they make the wrong guess or can't repair the DNA to original condition.  That's why you have the suicide mechanism.  A cell that has been so severely damaged that the suicide mechanism is activated has an unacceptably high likelihood of being sufficiently damage that it won't be able to be repaired back to 'manufacturers specifications'.
<p>Rather than take the chance that the repairs that get done will leave the cell cancerous, the cell is programmed to suicide.  Another cell will take it's place.     But in the case of fatal radiation poisoning, this happens to too many cells at once.
</p><p>'Unacceptable risk' that a cell might turn cancerous might be a very low risk indeed, since cancer is fatal 'in the wild'.  Most radiation damaged cells might very well be able to repair themselves perfectly if only they didn't suicide.  Deactivating the suicide mechanism temporarily  gives them time to repair themselves.  Once repaired, they no longer want to suicide.  However in the case where many cells were radiation damaged, this likely means some cells were repaired incorrectly and will now cause cancer.  Maybe this is not as likely as it may seem at first?  How well does radiation cause cancer?  How exactly does it happen?  I've heard that a speck of plutonium inhaled has a 100\% chance of causing lung cancer.  But that speck is emmitting radiation 24x7 killing and damaging neighboring cells all the time.  Is it the nuclear damage to the cells that causes the cancer, or is it the constant healing?  Doesn't the body send stem cells to repair damaged areas?  Aren't stem cells more cancer prone?
</p><p>Maybe in the case of radiation poisoning, the cells are damaged, and if prevented from suiciding, they will be fine.  This isn't chronic radiation damage caused by contamination, but rather acute radiation poisoning caused by having rads of radiation shined through you.
</p><p>Maybe not.  Excessive X-Ray photographs cause cancer don't they?    Maybe the irradiated mice and monkeys will be teeming with tumors in short order.  Maybe some of them will touch their keepers and pick up some genetic material.  Then they will mutate to be more humanlike, including having intelligence, and natural talent at karate.  They will go live in the sewers and protect us from evil ninja gangs with their elite Kung Fu skillz.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
According to TFA , your DNA is still ripped to shreds , but the drug supresses your cells ' suicide mechanism that having 'corrupted data ' in the DNA activated .
The suicide mechanism helps keep damaged cells from becoming cancerous cells .
Instead they become dead cells .
In the case of lethal radiation poisoning , this happens to too many cells .
Now , your cells already do have mechanisms to repair DNA damage .
If something seems out of place , they can often make the right guess as to how to patch things back together .
There are corrupt hard drive repair utilities that do this too .
But sometimes they make the wrong guess or ca n't repair the DNA to original condition .
That 's why you have the suicide mechanism .
A cell that has been so severely damaged that the suicide mechanism is activated has an unacceptably high likelihood of being sufficiently damage that it wo n't be able to be repaired back to 'manufacturers specifications' .
Rather than take the chance that the repairs that get done will leave the cell cancerous , the cell is programmed to suicide .
Another cell will take it 's place .
But in the case of fatal radiation poisoning , this happens to too many cells at once .
'Unacceptable risk ' that a cell might turn cancerous might be a very low risk indeed , since cancer is fatal 'in the wild' .
Most radiation damaged cells might very well be able to repair themselves perfectly if only they did n't suicide .
Deactivating the suicide mechanism temporarily gives them time to repair themselves .
Once repaired , they no longer want to suicide .
However in the case where many cells were radiation damaged , this likely means some cells were repaired incorrectly and will now cause cancer .
Maybe this is not as likely as it may seem at first ?
How well does radiation cause cancer ?
How exactly does it happen ?
I 've heard that a speck of plutonium inhaled has a 100 \ % chance of causing lung cancer .
But that speck is emmitting radiation 24x7 killing and damaging neighboring cells all the time .
Is it the nuclear damage to the cells that causes the cancer , or is it the constant healing ?
Does n't the body send stem cells to repair damaged areas ?
Are n't stem cells more cancer prone ?
Maybe in the case of radiation poisoning , the cells are damaged , and if prevented from suiciding , they will be fine .
This is n't chronic radiation damage caused by contamination , but rather acute radiation poisoning caused by having rads of radiation shined through you .
Maybe not .
Excessive X-Ray photographs cause cancer do n't they ?
Maybe the irradiated mice and monkeys will be teeming with tumors in short order .
Maybe some of them will touch their keepers and pick up some genetic material .
Then they will mutate to be more humanlike , including having intelligence , and natural talent at karate .
They will go live in the sewers and protect us from evil ninja gangs with their elite Kung Fu skillz .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
According to TFA, your DNA is still ripped to shreds, but the drug supresses your cells' suicide mechanism that having 'corrupted data' in the DNA activated.
The suicide mechanism helps keep damaged cells from becoming cancerous cells.
Instead they become dead cells.
In the case of lethal radiation poisoning, this happens to too many cells.
Now, your cells already do have mechanisms to repair DNA damage.
If something seems out of place, they can often make the right guess as to how to patch things back together.
There are corrupt hard drive repair utilities that do this too.
But sometimes they make the wrong guess or can't repair the DNA to original condition.
That's why you have the suicide mechanism.
A cell that has been so severely damaged that the suicide mechanism is activated has an unacceptably high likelihood of being sufficiently damage that it won't be able to be repaired back to 'manufacturers specifications'.
Rather than take the chance that the repairs that get done will leave the cell cancerous, the cell is programmed to suicide.
Another cell will take it's place.
But in the case of fatal radiation poisoning, this happens to too many cells at once.
'Unacceptable risk' that a cell might turn cancerous might be a very low risk indeed, since cancer is fatal 'in the wild'.
Most radiation damaged cells might very well be able to repair themselves perfectly if only they didn't suicide.
Deactivating the suicide mechanism temporarily  gives them time to repair themselves.
Once repaired, they no longer want to suicide.
However in the case where many cells were radiation damaged, this likely means some cells were repaired incorrectly and will now cause cancer.
Maybe this is not as likely as it may seem at first?
How well does radiation cause cancer?
How exactly does it happen?
I've heard that a speck of plutonium inhaled has a 100\% chance of causing lung cancer.
But that speck is emmitting radiation 24x7 killing and damaging neighboring cells all the time.
Is it the nuclear damage to the cells that causes the cancer, or is it the constant healing?
Doesn't the body send stem cells to repair damaged areas?
Aren't stem cells more cancer prone?
Maybe in the case of radiation poisoning, the cells are damaged, and if prevented from suiciding, they will be fine.
This isn't chronic radiation damage caused by contamination, but rather acute radiation poisoning caused by having rads of radiation shined through you.
Maybe not.
Excessive X-Ray photographs cause cancer don't they?
Maybe the irradiated mice and monkeys will be teeming with tumors in short order.
Maybe some of them will touch their keepers and pick up some genetic material.
Then they will mutate to be more humanlike, including having intelligence, and natural talent at karate.
They will go live in the sewers and protect us from evil ninja gangs with their elite Kung Fu skillz.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728933</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28740783</id>
	<title>stops apoptosis? maybe useful for heart attacks.</title>
	<author>arkarumba</author>
	<datestamp>1247932260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps a little offtopic, but stopping apoptosis may be useful to prevent systemic self-dectruction of cells during reperfusion of heart attack victims or other victims deprived of oxygen - allowing people to recovery from being deprived of oxygen for an hour.<br>.<br>To Treat the Dead -- <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/35045\%5D" title="newsweek.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsweek.com/id/35045\%5D</a> [newsweek.com]<br>.<br>Currently they use a hypothermia protocol to reduce the damage done during reperfusion.<br><a href="http://www.med.upenn.edu/resuscitation/hypothermia/" title="upenn.edu" rel="nofollow">http://www.med.upenn.edu/resuscitation/hypothermia/</a> [upenn.edu]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps a little offtopic , but stopping apoptosis may be useful to prevent systemic self-dectruction of cells during reperfusion of heart attack victims or other victims deprived of oxygen - allowing people to recovery from being deprived of oxygen for an hour..To Treat the Dead -- http : //www.newsweek.com/id/35045 \ % 5D [ newsweek.com ] .Currently they use a hypothermia protocol to reduce the damage done during reperfusion.http : //www.med.upenn.edu/resuscitation/hypothermia/ [ upenn.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps a little offtopic, but stopping apoptosis may be useful to prevent systemic self-dectruction of cells during reperfusion of heart attack victims or other victims deprived of oxygen - allowing people to recovery from being deprived of oxygen for an hour..To Treat the Dead -- http://www.newsweek.com/id/35045\%5D [newsweek.com].Currently they use a hypothermia protocol to reduce the damage done during reperfusion.http://www.med.upenn.edu/resuscitation/hypothermia/ [upenn.edu]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731513</id>
	<title>Cynical ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247852640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course, someone cynical might assume that the Israelis plan to "immunize" their entire population against radiation sickness, and then nuke the fuck out of those damn Muslims. Someone cynical<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , someone cynical might assume that the Israelis plan to " immunize " their entire population against radiation sickness , and then nuke the fuck out of those damn Muslims .
Someone cynical .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, someone cynical might assume that the Israelis plan to "immunize" their entire population against radiation sickness, and then nuke the fuck out of those damn Muslims.
Someone cynical ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732045</id>
	<title>Re:it stops apoptosis</title>
	<author>Cedric Tsui</author>
	<datestamp>1247854800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It might not be that useful for cancer therapy. If it prevents cells from dying instead of spreading out the time at which cell deaths occur as AC suggests, then it could make the targeted tumors more resistant to the radiation dose.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It might not be that useful for cancer therapy .
If it prevents cells from dying instead of spreading out the time at which cell deaths occur as AC suggests , then it could make the targeted tumors more resistant to the radiation dose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It might not be that useful for cancer therapy.
If it prevents cells from dying instead of spreading out the time at which cell deaths occur as AC suggests, then it could make the targeted tumors more resistant to the radiation dose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729351</id>
	<title>awesome!</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1247843520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now i'll be able to get bitten by as many radioactive spiders with no worries!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now i 'll be able to get bitten by as many radioactive spiders with no worries !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now i'll be able to get bitten by as many radioactive spiders with no worries!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730741</id>
	<title>Re:Oh good,</title>
	<author>deadmongoose</author>
	<datestamp>1247849340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yay, the U.S. will now nuke people on purpose then sell them the cure for radiation poisoning.

This reminds me a one of my favorite quotes:

At my lemonade stand I used to give the first glass away free and
charge five dollars for the second glass. The refill contained the
antidote.
-Emo Phillips</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yay , the U.S. will now nuke people on purpose then sell them the cure for radiation poisoning .
This reminds me a one of my favorite quotes : At my lemonade stand I used to give the first glass away free and charge five dollars for the second glass .
The refill contained the antidote .
-Emo Phillips</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yay, the U.S. will now nuke people on purpose then sell them the cure for radiation poisoning.
This reminds me a one of my favorite quotes:

At my lemonade stand I used to give the first glass away free and
charge five dollars for the second glass.
The refill contained the
antidote.
-Emo Phillips</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732319</id>
	<title>Re:YNet isn't the only one who's picked it up..</title>
	<author>Nyrath the nearly wi</author>
	<datestamp>1247856000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, I found this reference in Scientific American.<p>From April 11, 2008. Not 2009, 200<strong>8</strong> </p><p>

<a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=new-drug-protects-against-radiation-damage" title="scientificamerican.com">http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=new-drug-protects-against-radiation-damage</a> [scientificamerican.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I found this reference in Scientific American.From April 11 , 2008 .
Not 2009 , 2008 http : //www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm ? id = new-drug-protects-against-radiation-damage [ scientificamerican.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I found this reference in Scientific American.From April 11, 2008.
Not 2009, 2008 

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=new-drug-protects-against-radiation-damage [scientificamerican.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729643</id>
	<title>Re:Better Article &amp; 2008 Shareholder Report</title>
	<author>vojtech</author>
	<datestamp>1247844840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, the article on Medical News is about a different, yet also remarkable anti-cancer drug from the same company.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the article on Medical News is about a different , yet also remarkable anti-cancer drug from the same company .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the article on Medical News is about a different, yet also remarkable anti-cancer drug from the same company.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730261</id>
	<title>But...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247847360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you start aging because of radiation damage, though... remember that this stuff won't work.  Take adrenaline instead!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you start aging because of radiation damage , though... remember that this stuff wo n't work .
Take adrenaline instead !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you start aging because of radiation damage, though... remember that this stuff won't work.
Take adrenaline instead!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729427</id>
	<title>Re:72 hours after exposure?</title>
	<author>TheLink</author>
	<datestamp>1247843760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Probably not.<br><br>More likely it just stops the damaged cells from committing suicide.<br><br>Any increase in cancer rates shouldn't be a big problem for mice, since most mice have a max lifespan of 2-3 years anyway.<br><br>That said, not all damaged cells would end up as cancer, or even nonmalignant tumours. They could just be different from normal in a nonlethal or "big problem" way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably not.More likely it just stops the damaged cells from committing suicide.Any increase in cancer rates should n't be a big problem for mice , since most mice have a max lifespan of 2-3 years anyway.That said , not all damaged cells would end up as cancer , or even nonmalignant tumours .
They could just be different from normal in a nonlethal or " big problem " way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably not.More likely it just stops the damaged cells from committing suicide.Any increase in cancer rates shouldn't be a big problem for mice, since most mice have a max lifespan of 2-3 years anyway.That said, not all damaged cells would end up as cancer, or even nonmalignant tumours.
They could just be different from normal in a nonlethal or "big problem" way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728933</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729143</id>
	<title>Re:72 hours after exposure?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247842620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So this can patch you DNA back together after it's been ripped to shreds?</p></div></blockquote><p>Nope, but it can prevent that highly damaged cell from dying.  Which is believable, unlike the zero side effect claims.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So this can patch you DNA back together after it 's been ripped to shreds ? Nope , but it can prevent that highly damaged cell from dying .
Which is believable , unlike the zero side effect claims .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So this can patch you DNA back together after it's been ripped to shreds?Nope, but it can prevent that highly damaged cell from dying.
Which is believable, unlike the zero side effect claims.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728933</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729051</id>
	<title>Re:I doubt it...</title>
	<author>v1</author>
	<datestamp>1247842260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and then there's also the DNA getting chopped up and shuffled around</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and then there 's also the DNA getting chopped up and shuffled around</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and then there's also the DNA getting chopped up and shuffled around</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729575</id>
	<title>Re:I need a car analogy...</title>
	<author>Em Emalb</author>
	<datestamp>1247844600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh sure, bring my secret shame to light.  The truth is, I can't read.  So RTFA is not an option.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh sure , bring my secret shame to light .
The truth is , I ca n't read .
So RTFA is not an option .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh sure, bring my secret shame to light.
The truth is, I can't read.
So RTFA is not an option.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729235</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731941</id>
	<title>Look at the date</title>
	<author>luca</author>
	<datestamp>1247854380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The BBC article is from 2008.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The BBC article is from 2008 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The BBC article is from 2008.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729561</id>
	<title>Hyronalin</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1247844540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like they may have discovered Hyronalin<br>.<br><a href="http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Hyronalin" title="memory-alpha.org">http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Hyronalin</a> [memory-alpha.org]<br>.<br>Wake me up when they have discovered Warp Drive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like they may have discovered Hyronalin.http : //memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Hyronalin [ memory-alpha.org ] .Wake me up when they have discovered Warp Drive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like they may have discovered Hyronalin.http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Hyronalin [memory-alpha.org].Wake me up when they have discovered Warp Drive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732577</id>
	<title>Re:72 hours after exposure?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247857200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice post. Engaging dialog, good questions explored, even a little humor.  If you didn't already have +5 I'd give you an extra.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice post .
Engaging dialog , good questions explored , even a little humor .
If you did n't already have + 5 I 'd give you an extra .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice post.
Engaging dialog, good questions explored, even a little humor.
If you didn't already have +5 I'd give you an extra.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729409</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729599</id>
	<title>Fallout</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1247844660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, *please* call it RadAway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , * please * call it RadAway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, *please* call it RadAway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731965</id>
	<title>Re:Just In Time For :</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247854500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think her argument would be the stability of the government.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think her argument would be the stability of the government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think her argument would be the stability of the government.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729913</id>
	<title>How is  this a cure for cancer?</title>
	<author>RemoWilliams84</author>
	<datestamp>1247845920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't understand how this could be a cure for cancer.</p><p>I do see how it would possible cure some of the side effects from radiation treatment for cancer.</p><p>Or would it just nullify the radiation treatment altogether?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand how this could be a cure for cancer.I do see how it would possible cure some of the side effects from radiation treatment for cancer.Or would it just nullify the radiation treatment altogether ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand how this could be a cure for cancer.I do see how it would possible cure some of the side effects from radiation treatment for cancer.Or would it just nullify the radiation treatment altogether?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28735031</id>
	<title>Re:72 hours after exposure?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247825100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, but consider...</p><p>Obviously, there is some lifetime to the protein since it must be administered within some time before or after the radiation exposure. Perhaps delaying the suicide of cells allows those that can repair themselves adequately to survive, while others that cannot repair themselves completely simply defer their suicide to a later time when the protein is gone.</p><p>At the same time, all cancer is not necessarily fatal. Their are many body defenses that actively search for defective cells of one kind or another and destroy them.</p><p>The human body is a marvelously robust system. Given just a little reprieve, like this protein seems to provide, and it may well be able to recover from extensive damage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , but consider...Obviously , there is some lifetime to the protein since it must be administered within some time before or after the radiation exposure .
Perhaps delaying the suicide of cells allows those that can repair themselves adequately to survive , while others that can not repair themselves completely simply defer their suicide to a later time when the protein is gone.At the same time , all cancer is not necessarily fatal .
Their are many body defenses that actively search for defective cells of one kind or another and destroy them.The human body is a marvelously robust system .
Given just a little reprieve , like this protein seems to provide , and it may well be able to recover from extensive damage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, but consider...Obviously, there is some lifetime to the protein since it must be administered within some time before or after the radiation exposure.
Perhaps delaying the suicide of cells allows those that can repair themselves adequately to survive, while others that cannot repair themselves completely simply defer their suicide to a later time when the protein is gone.At the same time, all cancer is not necessarily fatal.
Their are many body defenses that actively search for defective cells of one kind or another and destroy them.The human body is a marvelously robust system.
Given just a little reprieve, like this protein seems to provide, and it may well be able to recover from extensive damage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729409</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729581</id>
	<title>Re:YNet isn't the only one who's picked it up..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247844600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ynet is Israel's top news site, owned by the most popular newspaper, Yedioth Achronoth (don't you love it when Hebrew names sound like mythical monsters?).<br>The story is on the front page of the paper today as well. I can vouch for the site and newspaper's credibility (I actually worked there many many years ago), but not for this story.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ynet is Israel 's top news site , owned by the most popular newspaper , Yedioth Achronoth ( do n't you love it when Hebrew names sound like mythical monsters ?
) .The story is on the front page of the paper today as well .
I can vouch for the site and newspaper 's credibility ( I actually worked there many many years ago ) , but not for this story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ynet is Israel's top news site, owned by the most popular newspaper, Yedioth Achronoth (don't you love it when Hebrew names sound like mythical monsters?
).The story is on the front page of the paper today as well.
I can vouch for the site and newspaper's credibility (I actually worked there many many years ago), but not for this story.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729937</id>
	<title>Re:Suicidal cells</title>
	<author>smellsofbikes</author>
	<datestamp>1247845980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apoptosis, programmed cell death, is very easy to turn on, and very hard to turn off, because the body's usual mode of operation is to just make another cell.  They're cheap.  So you want them to die off if there's any doubt at all whether they're healthy.  So if a cell suffers almost any damage, it just kills itself rather than risk cancer.<p>
In the case of radiation poisoning, the problem is that so many cells die, that you die.  If you can prevent them all dying, you can maybe handle the cancer issues from cells that were damaged such that they've become precancerous, later.</p><p>
The other thing that's interesting about this, to me, is that there are indications that people who have had heart attacks or hypothermia don't die from those, but from a <a href="http://www.scripps.edu/newsandviews/e\_20040315/gottlieb.html" title="scripps.edu">massive wave of programmed cell death as a result of, essentially, misinterpreting the results of the heart attack/hypothermia: big fluctuations in oxygen levels and ion concentrations</a> [scripps.edu], that make the cells all think they're individually damaged and cause them to die en masse.  If this could be used to stop that process, it could save millions of lives every year, not just the very few people who have radiation poisoning.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apoptosis , programmed cell death , is very easy to turn on , and very hard to turn off , because the body 's usual mode of operation is to just make another cell .
They 're cheap .
So you want them to die off if there 's any doubt at all whether they 're healthy .
So if a cell suffers almost any damage , it just kills itself rather than risk cancer .
In the case of radiation poisoning , the problem is that so many cells die , that you die .
If you can prevent them all dying , you can maybe handle the cancer issues from cells that were damaged such that they 've become precancerous , later .
The other thing that 's interesting about this , to me , is that there are indications that people who have had heart attacks or hypothermia do n't die from those , but from a massive wave of programmed cell death as a result of , essentially , misinterpreting the results of the heart attack/hypothermia : big fluctuations in oxygen levels and ion concentrations [ scripps.edu ] , that make the cells all think they 're individually damaged and cause them to die en masse .
If this could be used to stop that process , it could save millions of lives every year , not just the very few people who have radiation poisoning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apoptosis, programmed cell death, is very easy to turn on, and very hard to turn off, because the body's usual mode of operation is to just make another cell.
They're cheap.
So you want them to die off if there's any doubt at all whether they're healthy.
So if a cell suffers almost any damage, it just kills itself rather than risk cancer.
In the case of radiation poisoning, the problem is that so many cells die, that you die.
If you can prevent them all dying, you can maybe handle the cancer issues from cells that were damaged such that they've become precancerous, later.
The other thing that's interesting about this, to me, is that there are indications that people who have had heart attacks or hypothermia don't die from those, but from a massive wave of programmed cell death as a result of, essentially, misinterpreting the results of the heart attack/hypothermia: big fluctuations in oxygen levels and ion concentrations [scripps.edu], that make the cells all think they're individually damaged and cause them to die en masse.
If this could be used to stop that process, it could save millions of lives every year, not just the very few people who have radiation poisoning.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28733417</id>
	<title>Re:Possible fraud?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247861160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One reason for that may be that it takes years to get FDA approval from the U.S. federal government.</p></div><p>And Europe doesn't have similar restrictions on medical treatments?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One reason for that may be that it takes years to get FDA approval from the U.S. federal government.And Europe does n't have similar restrictions on medical treatments ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One reason for that may be that it takes years to get FDA approval from the U.S. federal government.And Europe doesn't have similar restrictions on medical treatments?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729915</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729241</id>
	<title>Cooked from the inside</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247843040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exposures can involve dust, particulate matter, or the radioactive element itself.  If you get these solids somehow lodged in you lungs etc. you're screwed.  They sit there and decay and irradiate your innards until golden brown.  Most of this was from a quantum class I took where the prof explained exposure to alpha/gamma/beta is certainly not good but its survivable - ingesting/breathing radioactive dust is very very bad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exposures can involve dust , particulate matter , or the radioactive element itself .
If you get these solids somehow lodged in you lungs etc .
you 're screwed .
They sit there and decay and irradiate your innards until golden brown .
Most of this was from a quantum class I took where the prof explained exposure to alpha/gamma/beta is certainly not good but its survivable - ingesting/breathing radioactive dust is very very bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exposures can involve dust, particulate matter, or the radioactive element itself.
If you get these solids somehow lodged in you lungs etc.
you're screwed.
They sit there and decay and irradiate your innards until golden brown.
Most of this was from a quantum class I took where the prof explained exposure to alpha/gamma/beta is certainly not good but its survivable - ingesting/breathing radioactive dust is very very bad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28734523</id>
	<title>Space</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247822820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We still need to figure out what to do about Cosmic Rays. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic\_ray\_visual\_phenomena and micrometeorites during interstellar flight. Deflector dish needed!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We still need to figure out what to do about Cosmic Rays .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic \ _ray \ _visual \ _phenomena and micrometeorites during interstellar flight .
Deflector dish needed !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We still need to figure out what to do about Cosmic Rays.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic\_ray\_visual\_phenomena and micrometeorites during interstellar flight.
Deflector dish needed!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731165</id>
	<title>Re:YNet isn't the only one who's picked it up..</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1247851020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't that because many mythical monsters are Hebrew? Golem, Behemoth, Leviathan...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't that because many mythical monsters are Hebrew ?
Golem , Behemoth , Leviathan.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't that because many mythical monsters are Hebrew?
Golem, Behemoth, Leviathan...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731519</id>
	<title>What is this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247852640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not entirely sure why Israelis in particular would be excited about this, even with the Iran issue.  The pill is not exactly going to help if a nuke is dropped on top of your country, especially if the country is the size of my little finger.  </p><p>However, I guess if anything were to wipe out all the holy sites in the region, irradiating the area, then this sort of pill would allow the religious nutbars to return, to continue their loony worship at their "holy" craters (pun intended), and also continue to fight other religious groups over who has claim to the aforementioned craters.  Heck, the way things work now I guess irradiating the area would sort of add to the divinity factor...</p><p>Perhaps the Israelis won't be willing to share the pill with other religious groups?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not entirely sure why Israelis in particular would be excited about this , even with the Iran issue .
The pill is not exactly going to help if a nuke is dropped on top of your country , especially if the country is the size of my little finger .
However , I guess if anything were to wipe out all the holy sites in the region , irradiating the area , then this sort of pill would allow the religious nutbars to return , to continue their loony worship at their " holy " craters ( pun intended ) , and also continue to fight other religious groups over who has claim to the aforementioned craters .
Heck , the way things work now I guess irradiating the area would sort of add to the divinity factor...Perhaps the Israelis wo n't be willing to share the pill with other religious groups ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not entirely sure why Israelis in particular would be excited about this, even with the Iran issue.
The pill is not exactly going to help if a nuke is dropped on top of your country, especially if the country is the size of my little finger.
However, I guess if anything were to wipe out all the holy sites in the region, irradiating the area, then this sort of pill would allow the religious nutbars to return, to continue their loony worship at their "holy" craters (pun intended), and also continue to fight other religious groups over who has claim to the aforementioned craters.
Heck, the way things work now I guess irradiating the area would sort of add to the divinity factor...Perhaps the Israelis won't be willing to share the pill with other religious groups?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28733169</id>
	<title>Re:650 + monkeys ?</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1247859840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This would be far beyond what would be nessesary for statistically significant data and monkeys are expensive</i></p><p>And if the monkeys aren't expensive, then you should <a href="http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/html/monkeys.txt" title="0xdeadbeef.com">be suspicious of their quality</a> [0xdeadbeef.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This would be far beyond what would be nessesary for statistically significant data and monkeys are expensiveAnd if the monkeys are n't expensive , then you should be suspicious of their quality [ 0xdeadbeef.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would be far beyond what would be nessesary for statistically significant data and monkeys are expensiveAnd if the monkeys aren't expensive, then you should be suspicious of their quality [0xdeadbeef.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731161</id>
	<title>I'm confused</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247850960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt;&gt;They have not irradiated any people just yet, but if this turns out to be true, it could mean everything from curing cancer to making manned interplanetary space expeditions feasible...

<b>Is it the fact that they not irradiated any people just yet</b> that could mean everything from curing cancer to making manned interplanetary space expeditions feasible...
<br>
or
<br>
is it <b>irradiating people</b> that could mean everything from curing cancer to making manned interplanetary space expeditions feasible...</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; They have not irradiated any people just yet , but if this turns out to be true , it could mean everything from curing cancer to making manned interplanetary space expeditions feasible.. . Is it the fact that they not irradiated any people just yet that could mean everything from curing cancer to making manned interplanetary space expeditions feasible.. . or is it irradiating people that could mean everything from curing cancer to making manned interplanetary space expeditions feasible.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;They have not irradiated any people just yet, but if this turns out to be true, it could mean everything from curing cancer to making manned interplanetary space expeditions feasible...

Is it the fact that they not irradiated any people just yet that could mean everything from curing cancer to making manned interplanetary space expeditions feasible...

or

is it irradiating people that could mean everything from curing cancer to making manned interplanetary space expeditions feasible...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728923</id>
	<title>I need a car analogy...</title>
	<author>Em Emalb</author>
	<datestamp>1247841780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kidding, kidding.</p><p>I wonder if this could be used to help cancer patients who are undergoing radiation treatment.</p><p>Hell, it's early, so I may not be thinking correctly, but it seems to me like a little dose of this would go a long way to curing the horrible side effects of cancer treatment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kidding , kidding.I wonder if this could be used to help cancer patients who are undergoing radiation treatment.Hell , it 's early , so I may not be thinking correctly , but it seems to me like a little dose of this would go a long way to curing the horrible side effects of cancer treatment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kidding, kidding.I wonder if this could be used to help cancer patients who are undergoing radiation treatment.Hell, it's early, so I may not be thinking correctly, but it seems to me like a little dose of this would go a long way to curing the horrible side effects of cancer treatment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729081</id>
	<title>it stops apoptosis</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247842380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>QUOTE : <i>Researchers developed the drug after looking at how some resistant cancer cells are able to withstand radiotherapy.
<br>
<b>It works by inhibiting the protein that initiates the cell suicide programme</b> </i> <br> <br>In other word it does not repair radiation damage (cue the rad away joke), it just stops all the cells where this protein is present to die. Whether there was a good reason for them to die or not. It might be wonderful for radiation treatment, though. The researcher seems conscient of the risk (like new cancer developping).</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>QUOTE : Researchers developed the drug after looking at how some resistant cancer cells are able to withstand radiotherapy .
It works by inhibiting the protein that initiates the cell suicide programme In other word it does not repair radiation damage ( cue the rad away joke ) , it just stops all the cells where this protein is present to die .
Whether there was a good reason for them to die or not .
It might be wonderful for radiation treatment , though .
The researcher seems conscient of the risk ( like new cancer developping ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>QUOTE : Researchers developed the drug after looking at how some resistant cancer cells are able to withstand radiotherapy.
It works by inhibiting the protein that initiates the cell suicide programme   In other word it does not repair radiation damage (cue the rad away joke), it just stops all the cells where this protein is present to die.
Whether there was a good reason for them to die or not.
It might be wonderful for radiation treatment, though.
The researcher seems conscient of the risk (like new cancer developping).
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731333</id>
	<title>Known work, but may be making progress</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1247851860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
First, this isn't new; the company issued a press release on PR Newswire in January 2007.
</p><p>
It has nothing to do with Israel; <a href="http://www.cbiolabs.com/acute\_Radiation\_syndrome.php" title="cbiolabs.com">the work is being done at Cleveland BioLabs in Cleveland, Ohio.</a> [cbiolabs.com] The researcher behind this, <a href="http://www.cbiolabs.com/management.php" title="cbiolabs.com">Andrei Gudkov</a> [cbiolabs.com], is Russian.  He was at the National Cancer Research Center in Moscow until 1990, then came to the US and became a professor at the University of Illinois.
</p><p>
This seems to be legitimate; they're in FDA Phase I human testing (safety only, not effectiveness.).  That doesn't mean it will work; if it makes it through Phase II, it's real.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First , this is n't new ; the company issued a press release on PR Newswire in January 2007 .
It has nothing to do with Israel ; the work is being done at Cleveland BioLabs in Cleveland , Ohio .
[ cbiolabs.com ] The researcher behind this , Andrei Gudkov [ cbiolabs.com ] , is Russian .
He was at the National Cancer Research Center in Moscow until 1990 , then came to the US and became a professor at the University of Illinois .
This seems to be legitimate ; they 're in FDA Phase I human testing ( safety only , not effectiveness. ) .
That does n't mean it will work ; if it makes it through Phase II , it 's real .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
First, this isn't new; the company issued a press release on PR Newswire in January 2007.
It has nothing to do with Israel; the work is being done at Cleveland BioLabs in Cleveland, Ohio.
[cbiolabs.com] The researcher behind this, Andrei Gudkov [cbiolabs.com], is Russian.
He was at the National Cancer Research Center in Moscow until 1990, then came to the US and became a professor at the University of Illinois.
This seems to be legitimate; they're in FDA Phase I human testing (safety only, not effectiveness.).
That doesn't mean it will work; if it makes it through Phase II, it's real.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729037</id>
	<title>BG?</title>
	<author>Cpt\_Kirks</author>
	<datestamp>1247842200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is that the stuff Helo kept shooting up while he was stranded on Caprica?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that the stuff Helo kept shooting up while he was stranded on Caprica ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that the stuff Helo kept shooting up while he was stranded on Caprica?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28736019</id>
	<title>Re:Possible fraud?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247831520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In other words, not for general use.<br>
Only those who got large short term exposures, in conjunction with other drugs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In other words , not for general use .
Only those who got large short term exposures , in conjunction with other drugs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other words, not for general use.
Only those who got large short term exposures, in conjunction with other drugs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729915</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28733935</id>
	<title>Re:I doubt it...</title>
	<author>ikedasquid</author>
	<datestamp>1247863560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So it may work on radiation sickness, which has to do with the effects of organ &amp; blood cells malfunctioning.  On the other hand the destruction of DNA is what leads to cancer from radiation and is really the much much bigger problem in related fields (such as medicine or nuclear power).  So you may not get sick and die after absorbing 500 REM, but you're still going to be subject to a higher rate of cancer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So it may work on radiation sickness , which has to do with the effects of organ &amp; blood cells malfunctioning .
On the other hand the destruction of DNA is what leads to cancer from radiation and is really the much much bigger problem in related fields ( such as medicine or nuclear power ) .
So you may not get sick and die after absorbing 500 REM , but you 're still going to be subject to a higher rate of cancer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it may work on radiation sickness, which has to do with the effects of organ &amp; blood cells malfunctioning.
On the other hand the destruction of DNA is what leads to cancer from radiation and is really the much much bigger problem in related fields (such as medicine or nuclear power).
So you may not get sick and die after absorbing 500 REM, but you're still going to be subject to a higher rate of cancer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728933</id>
	<title>72 hours after exposure?</title>
	<author>Ihlosi</author>
	<datestamp>1247841780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So this can patch you DNA back together after it's been ripped to shreds?</p><p>Pardon me, but I'm a bit sceptical.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So this can patch you DNA back together after it 's been ripped to shreds ? Pardon me , but I 'm a bit sceptical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So this can patch you DNA back together after it's been ripped to shreds?Pardon me, but I'm a bit sceptical.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732683</id>
	<title>Re:72 hours after exposure?</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1247857620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd guess the chronic irritation/healing is the risk -- after all, asbestos carries a similar risk, and the mechanism there isn't toxicity, but rather constant mechanical irritation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd guess the chronic irritation/healing is the risk -- after all , asbestos carries a similar risk , and the mechanism there is n't toxicity , but rather constant mechanical irritation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd guess the chronic irritation/healing is the risk -- after all, asbestos carries a similar risk, and the mechanism there isn't toxicity, but rather constant mechanical irritation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729409</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28739503</id>
	<title>Re:Understand the sociological background.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247915640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While what you say is true (there is genuine concern in Israel re: possibility of nuclear capability in Iranian hands), it's buried behind quite a lot of propagandist BS.

Video of Blackhawk helicopters firing on rock throwing palestinians? Link, or STFU.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While what you say is true ( there is genuine concern in Israel re : possibility of nuclear capability in Iranian hands ) , it 's buried behind quite a lot of propagandist BS .
Video of Blackhawk helicopters firing on rock throwing palestinians ?
Link , or STFU .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While what you say is true (there is genuine concern in Israel re: possibility of nuclear capability in Iranian hands), it's buried behind quite a lot of propagandist BS.
Video of Blackhawk helicopters firing on rock throwing palestinians?
Link, or STFU.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731507</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731423</id>
	<title>Re:Suicidal cells</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1247852280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They claim they didn't find cancer in the test animals afterwords, so I guess it is realistic. Considering the point is to make radiation treatment safer, a small chance of causing cancer is worth a better chance of curing the current cancer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They claim they did n't find cancer in the test animals afterwords , so I guess it is realistic .
Considering the point is to make radiation treatment safer , a small chance of causing cancer is worth a better chance of curing the current cancer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They claim they didn't find cancer in the test animals afterwords, so I guess it is realistic.
Considering the point is to make radiation treatment safer, a small chance of causing cancer is worth a better chance of curing the current cancer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731923</id>
	<title>Re:RadAway</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247854380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I call Vault 69.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I call Vault 69 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call Vault 69.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729413</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729181</id>
	<title>Not kosher!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247842800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Made from bacon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Made from bacon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Made from bacon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731615</id>
	<title>Re:OMG!</title>
	<author>GweeDo</author>
	<datestamp>1247853060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh be honest...you want Jet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh be honest...you want Jet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh be honest...you want Jet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729567</id>
	<title>Re:Why do Jews outperform Africans?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247844540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If your sole criteria for choosing a mate for offspring is based on IQ then in time Darwin will show you what he meant by "fittest". You're probably at the end of your bloodline already. Good luck surviving evolution.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If your sole criteria for choosing a mate for offspring is based on IQ then in time Darwin will show you what he meant by " fittest " .
You 're probably at the end of your bloodline already .
Good luck surviving evolution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If your sole criteria for choosing a mate for offspring is based on IQ then in time Darwin will show you what he meant by "fittest".
You're probably at the end of your bloodline already.
Good luck surviving evolution.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729469</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729475</id>
	<title>Another Use...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247844060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the procrastinator in all of us.  From the makers of Radaway, comes Another 10.</p><p>For far to many of us, we are not as organized as we shoud be during our final days, and if we simply had just a few more minutes we could get that last thing done, that last goodbye said, that last trigger pulled.</p><p>Now you can with, Another 10.  Stopping cell death, Another 10 will get you that one last chance at piece of mind.</p><p>Side effects have not been tested for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the procrastinator in all of us .
From the makers of Radaway , comes Another 10.For far to many of us , we are not as organized as we shoud be during our final days , and if we simply had just a few more minutes we could get that last thing done , that last goodbye said , that last trigger pulled.Now you can with , Another 10 .
Stopping cell death , Another 10 will get you that one last chance at piece of mind.Side effects have not been tested for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the procrastinator in all of us.
From the makers of Radaway, comes Another 10.For far to many of us, we are not as organized as we shoud be during our final days, and if we simply had just a few more minutes we could get that last thing done, that last goodbye said, that last trigger pulled.Now you can with, Another 10.
Stopping cell death, Another 10 will get you that one last chance at piece of mind.Side effects have not been tested for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731933</id>
	<title>Re:it stops apoptosis</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1247854380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If only the discussed this in the article and in the paper~</p><p>idiot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If only the discussed this in the article and in the paper ~ idiot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If only the discussed this in the article and in the paper~idiot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729435</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729499</id>
	<title>Re:I doubt it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247844120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's published in <i>Science</i> <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7341336.stm" title="bbc.co.uk">according to the BBC</a> [bbc.co.uk]. Jokes about tabloids aside, <i>Science</i> is a real scientific journal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's published in Science according to the BBC [ bbc.co.uk ] .
Jokes about tabloids aside , Science is a real scientific journal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's published in Science according to the BBC [bbc.co.uk].
Jokes about tabloids aside, Science is a real scientific journal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730435</id>
	<title>Super Snake Oil?</title>
	<author>Jack9</author>
	<datestamp>1247848020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>t could mean everything from curing cancer to making manned interplanetary space expeditions feasible</p></div></blockquote><p>If this was PERCIEVED as a real cure to Radiation Sickness, it would mean nuclear research would become much more prevalent (power in general would be cheaper!), cancer research would become more important, aging would be addressed with this in some way, and this pill would potentially give someone superpowers...from the ungodly number of mutations we would be around to see. Who knows how this would affect war efforts...probably not in a good way.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>t could mean everything from curing cancer to making manned interplanetary space expeditions feasibleIf this was PERCIEVED as a real cure to Radiation Sickness , it would mean nuclear research would become much more prevalent ( power in general would be cheaper !
) , cancer research would become more important , aging would be addressed with this in some way , and this pill would potentially give someone superpowers...from the ungodly number of mutations we would be around to see .
Who knows how this would affect war efforts...probably not in a good way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>t could mean everything from curing cancer to making manned interplanetary space expeditions feasibleIf this was PERCIEVED as a real cure to Radiation Sickness, it would mean nuclear research would become much more prevalent (power in general would be cheaper!
), cancer research would become more important, aging would be addressed with this in some way, and this pill would potentially give someone superpowers...from the ungodly number of mutations we would be around to see.
Who knows how this would affect war efforts...probably not in a good way.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732399</id>
	<title>Excellent news!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247856360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally, I can make use of the 20,000km&#194; of land that I bought in the Ukraine a few years back!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , I can make use of the 20,000km   of land that I bought in the Ukraine a few years back !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, I can make use of the 20,000kmÂ of land that I bought in the Ukraine a few years back!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732065</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing in the article suggests a cancer cure.</title>
	<author>Cedric Tsui</author>
	<datestamp>1247854920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the author believes this will allow for more aggressive radiation therapy as treatment for cancer tumors. That wouldn't be a cure, but it would substantially increase the effectiveness of treatment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the author believes this will allow for more aggressive radiation therapy as treatment for cancer tumors .
That would n't be a cure , but it would substantially increase the effectiveness of treatment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the author believes this will allow for more aggressive radiation therapy as treatment for cancer tumors.
That wouldn't be a cure, but it would substantially increase the effectiveness of treatment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729273</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732051</id>
	<title>The Mossad's new peace plan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247854860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Step 1: Put lots of the new protein in the Passover Motzah.<br>Step 2: At the end of the holiday, set off lots of dirty bombs over a wide area<br>Step 3: Peace in the Middle East.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Step 1 : Put lots of the new protein in the Passover Motzah.Step 2 : At the end of the holiday , set off lots of dirty bombs over a wide areaStep 3 : Peace in the Middle East .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Step 1: Put lots of the new protein in the Passover Motzah.Step 2: At the end of the holiday, set off lots of dirty bombs over a wide areaStep 3: Peace in the Middle East.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729837</id>
	<title>Larger implications?</title>
	<author>Konryou</author>
	<datestamp>1247845500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Dr Andrei Gudkov from the Lerner Research Institute in Cleveland, Ohio, said they had set out to enable healthy cells to imitate the ability of tumour cells to avoid cell death.
<br>
<b>But they had to develop a way of making this effect temporary and reversible. </b> </i>
<br> <br>
This was in the BBC version of events, and it looks like there might be further reaching effects than just a cure for radiation sickness.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dr Andrei Gudkov from the Lerner Research Institute in Cleveland , Ohio , said they had set out to enable healthy cells to imitate the ability of tumour cells to avoid cell death .
But they had to develop a way of making this effect temporary and reversible .
This was in the BBC version of events , and it looks like there might be further reaching effects than just a cure for radiation sickness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dr Andrei Gudkov from the Lerner Research Institute in Cleveland, Ohio, said they had set out to enable healthy cells to imitate the ability of tumour cells to avoid cell death.
But they had to develop a way of making this effect temporary and reversible.
This was in the BBC version of events, and it looks like there might be further reaching effects than just a cure for radiation sickness.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732843</id>
	<title>Re:Oh good,</title>
	<author>chord.wav</author>
	<datestamp>1247858220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What this really means is that we'll be able to drive nuclear-powered cars! No need to fear crashes or leaks anymore...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What this really means is that we 'll be able to drive nuclear-powered cars !
No need to fear crashes or leaks anymore.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What this really means is that we'll be able to drive nuclear-powered cars!
No need to fear crashes or leaks anymore...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28735497</id>
	<title>Re:YNet isn't the only one who's picked it up..</title>
	<author>nog\_lorp</author>
	<datestamp>1247828100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That Sunday Gazette isn't nearly as scary as the dreaded Gazebo...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That Sunday Gazette is n't nearly as scary as the dreaded Gazebo.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That Sunday Gazette isn't nearly as scary as the dreaded Gazebo...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731231</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883</id>
	<title>YNet isn't the only one who's picked it up..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247841600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, the BBC has a less slanted article: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7341336.stm" title="bbc.co.uk">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7341336.stm</a> [bbc.co.uk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the BBC has a less slanted article : http : //news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7341336.stm [ bbc.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the BBC has a less slanted article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7341336.stm [bbc.co.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729901</id>
	<title>No *observed* side-effects?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247845800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, acid has to "observed" side effects too, if you close your eyes while jumping in.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , acid has to " observed " side effects too , if you close your eyes while jumping in .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, acid has to "observed" side effects too, if you close your eyes while jumping in.
:P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730559</id>
	<title>Imaginary Reportage</title>
	<author>DynaSoar</author>
	<datestamp>1247848500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not the BioLabs stuff, the wild speculation and false statements spouted here being imaginary. Not a one here so far has attempted to find out if there actually were peer reviewed publications by Andrei Gudkov on the subject of radiation treatment and/or radioprotectants.</p><p>Go to <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez" title="nih.gov">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez</a> [nih.gov] </p><p>Put 'Gudkov, Andrei' in as the search term</p><p>You'll get 52 results with his name given as 'Gudkov AV'; the abstracts make it clear it's him by giving his associations.</p><p>Repeat the search with 'Gudkov, Andrei radiation' as the search term.</p><p>You'll get 10 results, all of which pertain to radiation treatment, radioprotectants and specifically the role of p53.</p><p>Two of those entries are reviews. Those would be the most instructive to any who actually want to find out if there's actually research on the subject and what it's about. Here's the two abstracts:</p><p>(1) Nat Rev Cancer. 2003 Feb;3(2):117-29.</p><p>
    The role of p53 in determining sensitivity to radiotherapy.</p><p>
    Gudkov AV, Komarova EA.</p><p>
    Department of Molecular Biology, NC20, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. gudkov@ccf.org</p><p>
    Ionizing radiation (IR) has proven to be a powerful medical treatment in the fight against cancer. Rational and effective use of its killing power depends on understanding IR-mediated responses at the molecular, cellular and tissue levels. Tumour cells frequently acquire defects in the molecular regulatory mechanisms of the response to IR, which sensitizes them to radiation therapy. One of the key molecules involved in a cell's response to IR is p53. Understanding these mechanisms indicates new rational approaches to improving cancer treatment by IR.</p><p>Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005 Jun 10;331(3):726-36.</p><p>
    Prospective therapeutic applications of p53 inhibitors.</p><p>
    Gudkov AV, Komarova EA.</p><p>
    Department of Molecular Genetics, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. gudkov@ccf.org</p><p>
    p53, in addition to being a key cancer preventive factor, is also a determinant of cancer treatment side effects causing excessive apoptotic death in several normal tissues during cancer therapy. p53 inhibitory strategy has been suggested to protect normal tissues from chemo- and radiotherapy, and to treat other pathologies associated with stress-mediated activation of p53. This strategy was validated by isolation and testing of small molecule p53 inhibitor pifithrin-alpha that demonstrated broad tissue protecting capacity. However, in some normal tissues and tumors p53 plays protective role by inducing growth arrest and preventing cells from premature entrance into mitosis and death from mitotic catastrophe. Inhibition of this function of p53 can sensitize tumor cells to chemo- and radiotherapy, thus opening new potential application of p53 inhibitors and justifying the need in pharmacological agents targeting specifically either pro-apoptotic or growth arrest functions of p53.</p><p>===</p><p>Note: 'Apoptosis' is the tendency for cells to die off based on signals from other nearby cells that are dying off -- a 'suicide signal'. This happens in many situations, radiation exposure being one of them.</p><p>As for emphasis on ethnicity, sure, they do mention it. The source noted is an Israeli newspaper. They have right to be proud since one of their citizens is accomplishing something notable to the world. Nobody seems to find it a problem when US newspapers note that a scientist is from the US. That's so common that it's not even noticed, unless you're not from the US. 90\% of scientific publications are from the US. In those from other countries it's common for such emphasis to be included so the w</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not the BioLabs stuff , the wild speculation and false statements spouted here being imaginary .
Not a one here so far has attempted to find out if there actually were peer reviewed publications by Andrei Gudkov on the subject of radiation treatment and/or radioprotectants.Go to http : //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez [ nih.gov ] Put 'Gudkov , Andrei ' in as the search termYou 'll get 52 results with his name given as 'Gudkov AV ' ; the abstracts make it clear it 's him by giving his associations.Repeat the search with 'Gudkov , Andrei radiation ' as the search term.You 'll get 10 results , all of which pertain to radiation treatment , radioprotectants and specifically the role of p53.Two of those entries are reviews .
Those would be the most instructive to any who actually want to find out if there 's actually research on the subject and what it 's about .
Here 's the two abstracts : ( 1 ) Nat Rev Cancer .
2003 Feb ; 3 ( 2 ) : 117-29 .
The role of p53 in determining sensitivity to radiotherapy .
Gudkov AV , Komarova EA .
Department of Molecular Biology , NC20 , Lerner Research Institute , Cleveland Clinic Foundation , 9500 Euclid Avenue , Cleveland , Ohio 44195 , USA .
gudkov @ ccf.org Ionizing radiation ( IR ) has proven to be a powerful medical treatment in the fight against cancer .
Rational and effective use of its killing power depends on understanding IR-mediated responses at the molecular , cellular and tissue levels .
Tumour cells frequently acquire defects in the molecular regulatory mechanisms of the response to IR , which sensitizes them to radiation therapy .
One of the key molecules involved in a cell 's response to IR is p53 .
Understanding these mechanisms indicates new rational approaches to improving cancer treatment by IR.Biochem Biophys Res Commun .
2005 Jun 10 ; 331 ( 3 ) : 726-36 .
Prospective therapeutic applications of p53 inhibitors .
Gudkov AV , Komarova EA .
Department of Molecular Genetics , Lerner Research Institute , The Cleveland Clinic Foundation , Cleveland , OH 44195 , USA .
gudkov @ ccf.org p53 , in addition to being a key cancer preventive factor , is also a determinant of cancer treatment side effects causing excessive apoptotic death in several normal tissues during cancer therapy .
p53 inhibitory strategy has been suggested to protect normal tissues from chemo- and radiotherapy , and to treat other pathologies associated with stress-mediated activation of p53 .
This strategy was validated by isolation and testing of small molecule p53 inhibitor pifithrin-alpha that demonstrated broad tissue protecting capacity .
However , in some normal tissues and tumors p53 plays protective role by inducing growth arrest and preventing cells from premature entrance into mitosis and death from mitotic catastrophe .
Inhibition of this function of p53 can sensitize tumor cells to chemo- and radiotherapy , thus opening new potential application of p53 inhibitors and justifying the need in pharmacological agents targeting specifically either pro-apoptotic or growth arrest functions of p53. = = = Note : 'Apoptosis ' is the tendency for cells to die off based on signals from other nearby cells that are dying off -- a 'suicide signal' .
This happens in many situations , radiation exposure being one of them.As for emphasis on ethnicity , sure , they do mention it .
The source noted is an Israeli newspaper .
They have right to be proud since one of their citizens is accomplishing something notable to the world .
Nobody seems to find it a problem when US newspapers note that a scientist is from the US .
That 's so common that it 's not even noticed , unless you 're not from the US .
90 \ % of scientific publications are from the US .
In those from other countries it 's common for such emphasis to be included so the w</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not the BioLabs stuff, the wild speculation and false statements spouted here being imaginary.
Not a one here so far has attempted to find out if there actually were peer reviewed publications by Andrei Gudkov on the subject of radiation treatment and/or radioprotectants.Go to http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez [nih.gov] Put 'Gudkov, Andrei' in as the search termYou'll get 52 results with his name given as 'Gudkov AV'; the abstracts make it clear it's him by giving his associations.Repeat the search with 'Gudkov, Andrei radiation' as the search term.You'll get 10 results, all of which pertain to radiation treatment, radioprotectants and specifically the role of p53.Two of those entries are reviews.
Those would be the most instructive to any who actually want to find out if there's actually research on the subject and what it's about.
Here's the two abstracts:(1) Nat Rev Cancer.
2003 Feb;3(2):117-29.
The role of p53 in determining sensitivity to radiotherapy.
Gudkov AV, Komarova EA.
Department of Molecular Biology, NC20, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
gudkov@ccf.org
    Ionizing radiation (IR) has proven to be a powerful medical treatment in the fight against cancer.
Rational and effective use of its killing power depends on understanding IR-mediated responses at the molecular, cellular and tissue levels.
Tumour cells frequently acquire defects in the molecular regulatory mechanisms of the response to IR, which sensitizes them to radiation therapy.
One of the key molecules involved in a cell's response to IR is p53.
Understanding these mechanisms indicates new rational approaches to improving cancer treatment by IR.Biochem Biophys Res Commun.
2005 Jun 10;331(3):726-36.
Prospective therapeutic applications of p53 inhibitors.
Gudkov AV, Komarova EA.
Department of Molecular Genetics, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
gudkov@ccf.org
    p53, in addition to being a key cancer preventive factor, is also a determinant of cancer treatment side effects causing excessive apoptotic death in several normal tissues during cancer therapy.
p53 inhibitory strategy has been suggested to protect normal tissues from chemo- and radiotherapy, and to treat other pathologies associated with stress-mediated activation of p53.
This strategy was validated by isolation and testing of small molecule p53 inhibitor pifithrin-alpha that demonstrated broad tissue protecting capacity.
However, in some normal tissues and tumors p53 plays protective role by inducing growth arrest and preventing cells from premature entrance into mitosis and death from mitotic catastrophe.
Inhibition of this function of p53 can sensitize tumor cells to chemo- and radiotherapy, thus opening new potential application of p53 inhibitors and justifying the need in pharmacological agents targeting specifically either pro-apoptotic or growth arrest functions of p53.===Note: 'Apoptosis' is the tendency for cells to die off based on signals from other nearby cells that are dying off -- a 'suicide signal'.
This happens in many situations, radiation exposure being one of them.As for emphasis on ethnicity, sure, they do mention it.
The source noted is an Israeli newspaper.
They have right to be proud since one of their citizens is accomplishing something notable to the world.
Nobody seems to find it a problem when US newspapers note that a scientist is from the US.
That's so common that it's not even noticed, unless you're not from the US.
90\% of scientific publications are from the US.
In those from other countries it's common for such emphasis to be included so the w</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729755</id>
	<title>Re:Oh good,</title>
	<author>Felgerkarb</author>
	<datestamp>1247845260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, it is an interesting point. <p>


One of the arguments against the Strategic Defense Initiative (Star Wars) was that it actually <i>increased</i> the risk of a nuclear war. I think you can make a similar argument here....if the effects of nuclear weapons are mitigated, doesn't that make people more likely to use them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , it is an interesting point .
One of the arguments against the Strategic Defense Initiative ( Star Wars ) was that it actually increased the risk of a nuclear war .
I think you can make a similar argument here....if the effects of nuclear weapons are mitigated , does n't that make people more likely to use them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, it is an interesting point.
One of the arguments against the Strategic Defense Initiative (Star Wars) was that it actually increased the risk of a nuclear war.
I think you can make a similar argument here....if the effects of nuclear weapons are mitigated, doesn't that make people more likely to use them?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28738051</id>
	<title>Canticle for Leibowitz</title>
	<author>lysdexia</author>
	<datestamp>1247848680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've just finished re-reading Walter Miller's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A\_Canticle\_for\_Leibowitz" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">"A Canticle for Leibowitz"</a> [wikipedia.org]. Couldn't sleep. "Aw to hell with it. Hmm<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Wonder what's on slashdot?"</p><p>Rock me to sleep tonight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've just finished re-reading Walter Miller 's " A Canticle for Leibowitz " [ wikipedia.org ] .
Could n't sleep .
" Aw to hell with it .
Hmm ... Wonder what 's on slashdot ?
" Rock me to sleep tonight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've just finished re-reading Walter Miller's "A Canticle for Leibowitz" [wikipedia.org].
Couldn't sleep.
"Aw to hell with it.
Hmm ... Wonder what's on slashdot?
"Rock me to sleep tonight.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28735133</id>
	<title>Re:YNet isn't the only one who's picked it up..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247825640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Adds all sorts of new parallels to movies like Godzilla, doesn't it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Adds all sorts of new parallels to movies like Godzilla , does n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Adds all sorts of new parallels to movies like Godzilla, doesn't it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731231</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731419</id>
	<title>Re:YNet isn't the only one who's picked it up..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247852280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I can vouch for the site and newspaper's credibility</i>
<br> <br>
LOL. Well that's fantastic! So tell us oh creditable AC? Who shall now vouch for you?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can vouch for the site and newspaper 's credibility LOL .
Well that 's fantastic !
So tell us oh creditable AC ?
Who shall now vouch for you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can vouch for the site and newspaper's credibility
 
LOL.
Well that's fantastic!
So tell us oh creditable AC?
Who shall now vouch for you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28742049</id>
	<title>Always a price to be paid...</title>
	<author>Jeprey</author>
	<datestamp>1247942820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>One minor detail - they are tweaking the normal DNA repair mechanism that normally would respond to DNA damaged caused by radiation.  What they are doing is suppressing the programmed cell death pathways that get triggered by unrepairable damage and possible even basic DNA repair.
<p>
The net result is that, sure, you live through the radiation exposure for the moment, but you've accumulated DNA damage that may or may not ever get repaired.  So you set yourself up for a very nasty cancer risk later on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One minor detail - they are tweaking the normal DNA repair mechanism that normally would respond to DNA damaged caused by radiation .
What they are doing is suppressing the programmed cell death pathways that get triggered by unrepairable damage and possible even basic DNA repair .
The net result is that , sure , you live through the radiation exposure for the moment , but you 've accumulated DNA damage that may or may not ever get repaired .
So you set yourself up for a very nasty cancer risk later on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One minor detail - they are tweaking the normal DNA repair mechanism that normally would respond to DNA damaged caused by radiation.
What they are doing is suppressing the programmed cell death pathways that get triggered by unrepairable damage and possible even basic DNA repair.
The net result is that, sure, you live through the radiation exposure for the moment, but you've accumulated DNA damage that may or may not ever get repaired.
So you set yourself up for a very nasty cancer risk later on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730633</id>
	<title>Re:I need a car analogy...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247848860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I know this is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./</i></p><p>It's the current directory...?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know this is ./It 's the current directory... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know this is ./It's the current directory...?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729235</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729789</id>
	<title>Re:YNet isn't the only one who's picked it up..</title>
	<author>Zecheus</author>
	<datestamp>1247845320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"picked it up"?  This BBC article is dated April 2008.  I guess news is slow in Israel.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" picked it up " ?
This BBC article is dated April 2008 .
I guess news is slow in Israel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"picked it up"?
This BBC article is dated April 2008.
I guess news is slow in Israel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730837</id>
	<title>Didn't Star Trek already invent hyronalin?</title>
	<author>GottliebPins</author>
	<datestamp>1247849700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also lectrazine</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also lectrazine</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also lectrazine</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28738935</id>
	<title>Sounds a bit breathlessly enthusiastic...</title>
	<author>jonadab</author>
	<datestamp>1247949000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; if this turns out to be true, it could mean everything from curing cancer<br><br>IANA oncologist, but I do not see how it could mean that.  I suppose it could mean preventing certain kinds of cancers that are caused by radiation, but that's not the same thing as curing cancer.<br><br>&gt; to making manned interplanetary space expeditions feasible...<br><br>And I *definitely* don't see that.  When it comes to planning a manned trip to, say, Mars, radiation is one of the smaller worries.  The big problems there are more logistical in nature, especially the ones having to do with not being able to send the travellers anything they might suddenly have a need for in anything resembling a reasonable timeframe.  This problem is bad enough at the south pole, where during the winter it can take several *weeks* to airdrop emergency supplies in if the weather doesn't cooperate.  On an interplanetary mission it would be months at minimum, possibly years, and would cost so much money that there's a real possibility it would not be forthcoming at all.  They'd be on their own in much the same way as the Plymouth Colony, only without the tremendous boon of going to a naturally hospitable area capable of supporting life.  Protection from radiation doesn't magically solve that kind of thing.<br><br>&gt; not to mention treatment for radiation exposures in nuclear/radiological accidents/attacks.<br><br>Well, yes, there is that.<br><br>&gt; If this drug works, it would mean a true breakthrough as past experiments<br>&gt; with radioprotectants were not particularly promising in any respect."<br><br>Indeed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; if this turns out to be true , it could mean everything from curing cancerIANA oncologist , but I do not see how it could mean that .
I suppose it could mean preventing certain kinds of cancers that are caused by radiation , but that 's not the same thing as curing cancer. &gt; to making manned interplanetary space expeditions feasible...And I * definitely * do n't see that .
When it comes to planning a manned trip to , say , Mars , radiation is one of the smaller worries .
The big problems there are more logistical in nature , especially the ones having to do with not being able to send the travellers anything they might suddenly have a need for in anything resembling a reasonable timeframe .
This problem is bad enough at the south pole , where during the winter it can take several * weeks * to airdrop emergency supplies in if the weather does n't cooperate .
On an interplanetary mission it would be months at minimum , possibly years , and would cost so much money that there 's a real possibility it would not be forthcoming at all .
They 'd be on their own in much the same way as the Plymouth Colony , only without the tremendous boon of going to a naturally hospitable area capable of supporting life .
Protection from radiation does n't magically solve that kind of thing. &gt; not to mention treatment for radiation exposures in nuclear/radiological accidents/attacks.Well , yes , there is that. &gt; If this drug works , it would mean a true breakthrough as past experiments &gt; with radioprotectants were not particularly promising in any respect .
" Indeed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; if this turns out to be true, it could mean everything from curing cancerIANA oncologist, but I do not see how it could mean that.
I suppose it could mean preventing certain kinds of cancers that are caused by radiation, but that's not the same thing as curing cancer.&gt; to making manned interplanetary space expeditions feasible...And I *definitely* don't see that.
When it comes to planning a manned trip to, say, Mars, radiation is one of the smaller worries.
The big problems there are more logistical in nature, especially the ones having to do with not being able to send the travellers anything they might suddenly have a need for in anything resembling a reasonable timeframe.
This problem is bad enough at the south pole, where during the winter it can take several *weeks* to airdrop emergency supplies in if the weather doesn't cooperate.
On an interplanetary mission it would be months at minimum, possibly years, and would cost so much money that there's a real possibility it would not be forthcoming at all.
They'd be on their own in much the same way as the Plymouth Colony, only without the tremendous boon of going to a naturally hospitable area capable of supporting life.
Protection from radiation doesn't magically solve that kind of thing.&gt; not to mention treatment for radiation exposures in nuclear/radiological accidents/attacks.Well, yes, there is that.&gt; If this drug works, it would mean a true breakthrough as past experiments&gt; with radioprotectants were not particularly promising in any respect.
"Indeed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729273</id>
	<title>Nothing in the article suggests a cancer cure.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247843100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps that was just speculation on the part of the submitter.</p><p>Curing cancer entails the difficult process of getting all the people who have cancer today to not have it later (short of dying).  A radioprotectant will not make cancer go away.  It also won't prevent new cancers, since radiation is not the only cause.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps that was just speculation on the part of the submitter.Curing cancer entails the difficult process of getting all the people who have cancer today to not have it later ( short of dying ) .
A radioprotectant will not make cancer go away .
It also wo n't prevent new cancers , since radiation is not the only cause .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps that was just speculation on the part of the submitter.Curing cancer entails the difficult process of getting all the people who have cancer today to not have it later (short of dying).
A radioprotectant will not make cancer go away.
It also won't prevent new cancers, since radiation is not the only cause.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730071</id>
	<title>Re:I doubt it...</title>
	<author>Chysn</author>
	<datestamp>1247846580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I really doubt a magic bullet can exist for the many types of cellular damage that can occur in different body systems.</p></div></blockquote><p>This is a preventive measure, though, not a cure.  The idea is to treat cancer patients before they're irradiated to reduce radiation damage to healthy cells.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really doubt a magic bullet can exist for the many types of cellular damage that can occur in different body systems.This is a preventive measure , though , not a cure .
The idea is to treat cancer patients before they 're irradiated to reduce radiation damage to healthy cells .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really doubt a magic bullet can exist for the many types of cellular damage that can occur in different body systems.This is a preventive measure, though, not a cure.
The idea is to treat cancer patients before they're irradiated to reduce radiation damage to healthy cells.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28738027</id>
	<title>Re:Jewish-American</title>
	<author>asaz989</author>
	<datestamp>1247848500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only reason YNetNews decided to report on it at all was that the researchers were Jewish. If it were a Jewish American paper like, say, the Jewish Journal writing this report (and they do occasionally report on things like this), then it would be very clear why they specify "Jewish-American" - otherwise there's little reason for the paper to report on it. Similarly, Yediot Aharonot is an Israeli paper catering either to an Israeli audience (in its Hebrew edition) or a foreign Jewish audience (in its English edition). Given that I can't even *find* this story in the Hebrew edition, I assume the story is exclusively aimed at a foreign Jewish audience (of whom probably 80-90\% are American), and they're going to YNetNews to hear (a) news from Israel, and (b) news about Jews. Hence also the emphasis on the impact on Israel, when the researchers are many thousands of miles away and are probably not thinking of Israel's defense as the first application for this drug.

You have a problem with news written from an ethnic/national perspective, go read the New York Times.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only reason YNetNews decided to report on it at all was that the researchers were Jewish .
If it were a Jewish American paper like , say , the Jewish Journal writing this report ( and they do occasionally report on things like this ) , then it would be very clear why they specify " Jewish-American " - otherwise there 's little reason for the paper to report on it .
Similarly , Yediot Aharonot is an Israeli paper catering either to an Israeli audience ( in its Hebrew edition ) or a foreign Jewish audience ( in its English edition ) .
Given that I ca n't even * find * this story in the Hebrew edition , I assume the story is exclusively aimed at a foreign Jewish audience ( of whom probably 80-90 \ % are American ) , and they 're going to YNetNews to hear ( a ) news from Israel , and ( b ) news about Jews .
Hence also the emphasis on the impact on Israel , when the researchers are many thousands of miles away and are probably not thinking of Israel 's defense as the first application for this drug .
You have a problem with news written from an ethnic/national perspective , go read the New York Times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only reason YNetNews decided to report on it at all was that the researchers were Jewish.
If it were a Jewish American paper like, say, the Jewish Journal writing this report (and they do occasionally report on things like this), then it would be very clear why they specify "Jewish-American" - otherwise there's little reason for the paper to report on it.
Similarly, Yediot Aharonot is an Israeli paper catering either to an Israeli audience (in its Hebrew edition) or a foreign Jewish audience (in its English edition).
Given that I can't even *find* this story in the Hebrew edition, I assume the story is exclusively aimed at a foreign Jewish audience (of whom probably 80-90\% are American), and they're going to YNetNews to hear (a) news from Israel, and (b) news about Jews.
Hence also the emphasis on the impact on Israel, when the researchers are many thousands of miles away and are probably not thinking of Israel's defense as the first application for this drug.
You have a problem with news written from an ethnic/national perspective, go read the New York Times.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729461</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731263</id>
	<title>Re:Just In Time For :</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247851500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because North Korea is at a state of war with the U.S.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because North Korea is at a state of war with the U.S .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because North Korea is at a state of war with the U.S.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28737909</id>
	<title>Re:I doubt it...</title>
	<author>Taint Bearer</author>
	<datestamp>1247846940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All IONISING radiation has the same effect on cellular components, regardless of whether its alpha, beta or gamma. They all cause oxidative damage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All IONISING radiation has the same effect on cellular components , regardless of whether its alpha , beta or gamma .
They all cause oxidative damage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All IONISING radiation has the same effect on cellular components, regardless of whether its alpha, beta or gamma.
They all cause oxidative damage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731139</id>
	<title>that was my first thought</title>
	<author>bstender</author>
	<datestamp>1247850900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>scams work exceedingly well if they propose solutions to deeply seated fears. everyone wants to believe it is true, even the harshest skeptics.</htmltext>
<tokenext>scams work exceedingly well if they propose solutions to deeply seated fears .
everyone wants to believe it is true , even the harshest skeptics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>scams work exceedingly well if they propose solutions to deeply seated fears.
everyone wants to believe it is true, even the harshest skeptics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729915</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730947</id>
	<title>Star Trek had it right</title>
	<author>Emrys01</author>
	<datestamp>1247850060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So all those times Dr. Crusher treated radiation poisoning with her magic hypospray syringe, she must have been injecting the crew with this stuff.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So all those times Dr. Crusher treated radiation poisoning with her magic hypospray syringe , she must have been injecting the crew with this stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So all those times Dr. Crusher treated radiation poisoning with her magic hypospray syringe, she must have been injecting the crew with this stuff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729861</id>
	<title>Re:Just In Time For :</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247845680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because most rational people realize that Israel will not use nuclear weapons unless attacked, nor will they sell them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because most rational people realize that Israel will not use nuclear weapons unless attacked , nor will they sell them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because most rational people realize that Israel will not use nuclear weapons unless attacked, nor will they sell them?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729645</id>
	<title>Re:I need a car analogy...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247844840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If only there were some sort of written material that would address questions like that...</p><p>(In lab tests, they've found so far that tumor cells don't appear to be protected.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If only there were some sort of written material that would address questions like that... ( In lab tests , they 've found so far that tumor cells do n't appear to be protected .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If only there were some sort of written material that would address questions like that...(In lab tests, they've found so far that tumor cells don't appear to be protected.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728985</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731287</id>
	<title>Re:Oh good,</title>
	<author>Velox\_SwiftFox</author>
	<datestamp>1247851680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is the opposite of the argument against enhanced radiation ("neutron bomb") weapons.</p><p>Would bombs that wreck buildings, but kill fewer though many people, make generals more likely to use them?</p><p>I'm more worried some nation stockpiling it will cause a preemptive war on themselves.</p><p>How would Israel view Iran deciding to provide each of its citizens with a self-injector?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is the opposite of the argument against enhanced radiation ( " neutron bomb " ) weapons.Would bombs that wreck buildings , but kill fewer though many people , make generals more likely to use them ? I 'm more worried some nation stockpiling it will cause a preemptive war on themselves.How would Israel view Iran deciding to provide each of its citizens with a self-injector ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is the opposite of the argument against enhanced radiation ("neutron bomb") weapons.Would bombs that wreck buildings, but kill fewer though many people, make generals more likely to use them?I'm more worried some nation stockpiling it will cause a preemptive war on themselves.How would Israel view Iran deciding to provide each of its citizens with a self-injector?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28736245</id>
	<title>Re:Oh good,</title>
	<author>egr</author>
	<datestamp>1247832960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>oh, sure, if you like lifeless deserts filled with only humans to eat</htmltext>
<tokenext>oh , sure , if you like lifeless deserts filled with only humans to eat</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oh, sure, if you like lifeless deserts filled with only humans to eat</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729631</id>
	<title>Re:I doubt it...</title>
	<author>Felgerkarb</author>
	<datestamp>1247844780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18403709?ordinalpos=2&amp;itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed\_ResultsPanel.Pubmed\_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed\_RVDocSum" title="nih.gov" rel="nofollow">Here</a> [nih.gov] is a link to an article about a radioprotective protein by the professor listed in the TFA.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here [ nih.gov ] is a link to an article about a radioprotective protein by the professor listed in the TFA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here [nih.gov] is a link to an article about a radioprotective protein by the professor listed in the TFA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732531</id>
	<title>Re:it stops apoptosis</title>
	<author>kencurry</author>
	<datestamp>1247856960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>so, the good new is that you won't die right away.

the bad new is that your new nickname is "tumor\_boy."</htmltext>
<tokenext>so , the good new is that you wo n't die right away .
the bad new is that your new nickname is " tumor \ _boy .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so, the good new is that you won't die right away.
the bad new is that your new nickname is "tumor\_boy.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729435</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731353</id>
	<title>History of the world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247851980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This was planned long, long ago... if you ever saw the movie <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082517/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">History of the World</a> [imdb.com] by Mel Brooks, you'd know.  The Part II, "Jews in Space" was planned but never released.  Now I know why!  They just werent ready, because this part wasnt ready!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This was planned long , long ago... if you ever saw the movie History of the World [ imdb.com ] by Mel Brooks , you 'd know .
The Part II , " Jews in Space " was planned but never released .
Now I know why !
They just werent ready , because this part wasnt ready !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was planned long, long ago... if you ever saw the movie History of the World [imdb.com] by Mel Brooks, you'd know.
The Part II, "Jews in Space" was planned but never released.
Now I know why!
They just werent ready, because this part wasnt ready!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730967</id>
	<title>Re:OMG!</title>
	<author>Cornflake917</author>
	<datestamp>1247850180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only thing that sucks now is that science vessels are totally nerfed<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only thing that sucks now is that science vessels are totally nerfed : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only thing that sucks now is that science vessels are totally nerfed :(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729461</id>
	<title>Jewish-American</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247843940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, it's quite weird that they ynet article feels it necessary to cite the scientist's religion. Does it really matter? I hear of news, a discovery, etc, my first thought is "where is this?" not "gee, what book does this person worship?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , it 's quite weird that they ynet article feels it necessary to cite the scientist 's religion .
Does it really matter ?
I hear of news , a discovery , etc , my first thought is " where is this ?
" not " gee , what book does this person worship ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, it's quite weird that they ynet article feels it necessary to cite the scientist's religion.
Does it really matter?
I hear of news, a discovery, etc, my first thought is "where is this?
" not "gee, what book does this person worship?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729747</id>
	<title>Re:Just In Time For :</title>
	<author>Kell Bengal</author>
	<datestamp>1247845200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait... why isn't anyone upset that the US and Russia have nuclear weapons?  'cus you know, neither of those powers has a history of invading other countries or general belligerence.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait... why is n't anyone upset that the US and Russia have nuclear weapons ?
'cus you know , neither of those powers has a history of invading other countries or general belligerence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait... why isn't anyone upset that the US and Russia have nuclear weapons?
'cus you know, neither of those powers has a history of invading other countries or general belligerence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730263</id>
	<title>Israel?</title>
	<author>toby</author>
	<datestamp>1247847420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why, because they (famously) have nuclear weapons and nobody else in the region does?</p><p>You're right, after all they might have an accident...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why , because they ( famously ) have nuclear weapons and nobody else in the region does ? You 're right , after all they might have an accident.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why, because they (famously) have nuclear weapons and nobody else in the region does?You're right, after all they might have an accident...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730619</id>
	<title>Re:I doubt it...</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1247848800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I really doubt a magic bullet can exist for the many types of cellular damage that can occur in different body systems.</i></p><p>But wouldn't it be awesome if it did? "Wow, you barely survived that nuclear blast. Here, let me shoot you with a to repair the damage." You get nuked and shot on the same day, and come out healthy!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really doubt a magic bullet can exist for the many types of cellular damage that can occur in different body systems.But would n't it be awesome if it did ?
" Wow , you barely survived that nuclear blast .
Here , let me shoot you with a to repair the damage .
" You get nuked and shot on the same day , and come out healthy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really doubt a magic bullet can exist for the many types of cellular damage that can occur in different body systems.But wouldn't it be awesome if it did?
"Wow, you barely survived that nuclear blast.
Here, let me shoot you with a to repair the damage.
" You get nuked and shot on the same day, and come out healthy!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729429</id>
	<title>Sounds like a familiar situation in the past...</title>
	<author>shacky003</author>
	<datestamp>1247843760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone remember the disgraced "scientist" that claimed cloned babies, etc?<br>
Maybe this only smells fishy because there's carp all over the damn place..</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone remember the disgraced " scientist " that claimed cloned babies , etc ?
Maybe this only smells fishy because there 's carp all over the damn place. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone remember the disgraced "scientist" that claimed cloned babies, etc?
Maybe this only smells fishy because there's carp all over the damn place..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28733183</id>
	<title>Description of research (app. by Dr. Gudkov)</title>
	<author>aheitner</author>
	<datestamp>1247859900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From <a href="http://www.roswellpark.org/Research/Research\_Staff/Gudkov\_Andrei" title="roswellpark.org" rel="nofollow">this bio at Roswell Park Cancer Institute</a> [roswellpark.org] in Buffalo:<br> <br>

[describing his own various research interests<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...]<br> <br>

<b>Role of p53 in Cancer</b> <br> <br>
Our p53 studies are focused on the mechanism and role of this TSG in how normal tissues respond to genotoxic stresses associated with cancer treatment. Our previous studies have shown tissue specificity of p53-mediated apoptosis and its major role in determining the radiation sensitivity of mammals. We defined p53 as a determinant of cancer treatment side effects; the new therapeutic concept&#226;"targeting p53 for therapeutic suppression&#226;"was justified by isolating a small molecule p53 inhibitor that rescues mice from lethal doses of gamma irradiation.
<br> <br>
Analysis of an animal model of chemotherapy-induced hair loss (alopecia) has indicated that p53 plays a major role in this common side effect, thus opening another area for clinical application of p53 inhibitors.
<br> <br>
Mechanisms of tissue specificity of the p53 response are being addressed by cDNA microarray-based analysis of tissue-specific p53 responsive genes. This direction of studies is linked to identification of new tumor markers among the genes that are under the negative control of p53, a mechanism we have shown to be a possible underlying cause of elevated prostate-specific antigen expression.
<br> <br>
The role of p53-dependent apoptosis and growth arrest and the interaction of p53 with other signaling pathways (TNF, Fas, heat shock, etc.) in determining its tumor suppressor function is being analyzed in several model systems. The impact of distinct p53 function (i.e., control of growth arrest or apoptosis) in its tumor suppressor activity is under investigation. We showed that control of radiosensitivity of tissues by p53 in vivo does not involve the p21/waf1 p53-responsive CDK inhibitor. Induction of apoptosis was found to be dispensable for p53-mediated control of genomic stability; moreover, suppression of p53-dependent apoptosis by Bcl-2 delays tumor progression by eliminating selective advantages for genetically unstable p53-deficient cells.
<br> <br>
Having already defined ING1, Bloom syndrome and SUMO proteins as p53 interactors, we are continuing the search for cellular modulators of p53 expression and function among p53-interacting proteins; several additional candidates are under study.
<br> <br>
<b>Drug Discovery Program</b> <br> <br>
Our drug discovery program involves searching for new p53 inhibitors and testing their potential therapeutic applications for reducing cancer treatment side effects and possibly other pathologies involving p53-inducing stresses. It is based on creation of new cell-based readout systems and high-throughput screening of chemicals with the desired biological properties.
<br> <br>
We are also isolating a new class of small molecules acting as modulators of multi-drug transporters that can greatly change the pattern of cross-resistance, including the ability to enhance their activity against certain compounds. The molecular mechanisms of activity of newly isolated compounds are being addressed, as are therapeutic fields for their practical applications.
<br> <br>
Collaborators:
<ul>
    <li>Elena Feinstein, M.D., Ph.D. (Quark Biotech, Inc., Nes Ziona, Israel)</li><li>Peter Chumakov, MD, Ph.D. (Lerner Research Institute, CCF) </li><li>Michelle Haber, Ph.D. &amp; Murray Norris, Ph.D. (Children's Cancer Institute of Australia, Sydney)</li><li>Raymond Tubbs, MD (Pathology, CCF)</li><li>Mikhail Nikiforov, Ph.D. (University of Michigan)</li><li>Mark Whitnall, Ph.D. (Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute)</li><li>Boris Naroditsky, Ph.D. (Gamaleya Institute of Microbiology, Russia)</li><li>Bruce Blazar, MD (University of Minnesota)</li><li>Joseph DiDonato, Ph.D. (Lerner Research Institute, CCF)</li><li>George R. Stark, Ph.D. (Lerner Research Institute, CCF)</li><li>Eric Klein, MD (CCF)</li><li>Oskar W. Rokhlin, Ph.D. (University of Iowa) </li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>From this bio at Roswell Park Cancer Institute [ roswellpark.org ] in Buffalo : [ describing his own various research interests ... ] Role of p53 in Cancer Our p53 studies are focused on the mechanism and role of this TSG in how normal tissues respond to genotoxic stresses associated with cancer treatment .
Our previous studies have shown tissue specificity of p53-mediated apoptosis and its major role in determining the radiation sensitivity of mammals .
We defined p53 as a determinant of cancer treatment side effects ; the new therapeutic concept   " targeting p53 for therapeutic suppression   " was justified by isolating a small molecule p53 inhibitor that rescues mice from lethal doses of gamma irradiation .
Analysis of an animal model of chemotherapy-induced hair loss ( alopecia ) has indicated that p53 plays a major role in this common side effect , thus opening another area for clinical application of p53 inhibitors .
Mechanisms of tissue specificity of the p53 response are being addressed by cDNA microarray-based analysis of tissue-specific p53 responsive genes .
This direction of studies is linked to identification of new tumor markers among the genes that are under the negative control of p53 , a mechanism we have shown to be a possible underlying cause of elevated prostate-specific antigen expression .
The role of p53-dependent apoptosis and growth arrest and the interaction of p53 with other signaling pathways ( TNF , Fas , heat shock , etc .
) in determining its tumor suppressor function is being analyzed in several model systems .
The impact of distinct p53 function ( i.e. , control of growth arrest or apoptosis ) in its tumor suppressor activity is under investigation .
We showed that control of radiosensitivity of tissues by p53 in vivo does not involve the p21/waf1 p53-responsive CDK inhibitor .
Induction of apoptosis was found to be dispensable for p53-mediated control of genomic stability ; moreover , suppression of p53-dependent apoptosis by Bcl-2 delays tumor progression by eliminating selective advantages for genetically unstable p53-deficient cells .
Having already defined ING1 , Bloom syndrome and SUMO proteins as p53 interactors , we are continuing the search for cellular modulators of p53 expression and function among p53-interacting proteins ; several additional candidates are under study .
Drug Discovery Program Our drug discovery program involves searching for new p53 inhibitors and testing their potential therapeutic applications for reducing cancer treatment side effects and possibly other pathologies involving p53-inducing stresses .
It is based on creation of new cell-based readout systems and high-throughput screening of chemicals with the desired biological properties .
We are also isolating a new class of small molecules acting as modulators of multi-drug transporters that can greatly change the pattern of cross-resistance , including the ability to enhance their activity against certain compounds .
The molecular mechanisms of activity of newly isolated compounds are being addressed , as are therapeutic fields for their practical applications .
Collaborators : Elena Feinstein , M.D. , Ph.D. ( Quark Biotech , Inc. , Nes Ziona , Israel ) Peter Chumakov , MD , Ph.D. ( Lerner Research Institute , CCF ) Michelle Haber , Ph.D. &amp; Murray Norris , Ph.D. ( Children 's Cancer Institute of Australia , Sydney ) Raymond Tubbs , MD ( Pathology , CCF ) Mikhail Nikiforov , Ph.D. ( University of Michigan ) Mark Whitnall , Ph.D. ( Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute ) Boris Naroditsky , Ph.D. ( Gamaleya Institute of Microbiology , Russia ) Bruce Blazar , MD ( University of Minnesota ) Joseph DiDonato , Ph.D. ( Lerner Research Institute , CCF ) George R. Stark , Ph.D. ( Lerner Research Institute , CCF ) Eric Klein , MD ( CCF ) Oskar W. Rokhlin , Ph.D. ( University of Iowa )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From this bio at Roswell Park Cancer Institute [roswellpark.org] in Buffalo: 

[describing his own various research interests ...] 

Role of p53 in Cancer  
Our p53 studies are focused on the mechanism and role of this TSG in how normal tissues respond to genotoxic stresses associated with cancer treatment.
Our previous studies have shown tissue specificity of p53-mediated apoptosis and its major role in determining the radiation sensitivity of mammals.
We defined p53 as a determinant of cancer treatment side effects; the new therapeutic conceptâ"targeting p53 for therapeutic suppressionâ"was justified by isolating a small molecule p53 inhibitor that rescues mice from lethal doses of gamma irradiation.
Analysis of an animal model of chemotherapy-induced hair loss (alopecia) has indicated that p53 plays a major role in this common side effect, thus opening another area for clinical application of p53 inhibitors.
Mechanisms of tissue specificity of the p53 response are being addressed by cDNA microarray-based analysis of tissue-specific p53 responsive genes.
This direction of studies is linked to identification of new tumor markers among the genes that are under the negative control of p53, a mechanism we have shown to be a possible underlying cause of elevated prostate-specific antigen expression.
The role of p53-dependent apoptosis and growth arrest and the interaction of p53 with other signaling pathways (TNF, Fas, heat shock, etc.
) in determining its tumor suppressor function is being analyzed in several model systems.
The impact of distinct p53 function (i.e., control of growth arrest or apoptosis) in its tumor suppressor activity is under investigation.
We showed that control of radiosensitivity of tissues by p53 in vivo does not involve the p21/waf1 p53-responsive CDK inhibitor.
Induction of apoptosis was found to be dispensable for p53-mediated control of genomic stability; moreover, suppression of p53-dependent apoptosis by Bcl-2 delays tumor progression by eliminating selective advantages for genetically unstable p53-deficient cells.
Having already defined ING1, Bloom syndrome and SUMO proteins as p53 interactors, we are continuing the search for cellular modulators of p53 expression and function among p53-interacting proteins; several additional candidates are under study.
Drug Discovery Program  
Our drug discovery program involves searching for new p53 inhibitors and testing their potential therapeutic applications for reducing cancer treatment side effects and possibly other pathologies involving p53-inducing stresses.
It is based on creation of new cell-based readout systems and high-throughput screening of chemicals with the desired biological properties.
We are also isolating a new class of small molecules acting as modulators of multi-drug transporters that can greatly change the pattern of cross-resistance, including the ability to enhance their activity against certain compounds.
The molecular mechanisms of activity of newly isolated compounds are being addressed, as are therapeutic fields for their practical applications.
Collaborators:

    Elena Feinstein, M.D., Ph.D. (Quark Biotech, Inc., Nes Ziona, Israel)Peter Chumakov, MD, Ph.D. (Lerner Research Institute, CCF) Michelle Haber, Ph.D. &amp; Murray Norris, Ph.D. (Children's Cancer Institute of Australia, Sydney)Raymond Tubbs, MD (Pathology, CCF)Mikhail Nikiforov, Ph.D. (University of Michigan)Mark Whitnall, Ph.D. (Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute)Boris Naroditsky, Ph.D. (Gamaleya Institute of Microbiology, Russia)Bruce Blazar, MD (University of Minnesota)Joseph DiDonato, Ph.D. (Lerner Research Institute, CCF)George R. Stark, Ph.D. (Lerner Research Institute, CCF)Eric Klein, MD (CCF)Oskar W. Rokhlin, Ph.D. (University of Iowa) </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729315</id>
	<title>I have a feeling...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247843340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...this'll be the key to *REAL* zombies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...this 'll be the key to * REAL * zombies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...this'll be the key to *REAL* zombies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730229</id>
	<title>Can this mean..</title>
	<author>ZX3 Junglist</author>
	<datestamp>1247847300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>..that we might finally get a season 3 of Jericho??</htmltext>
<tokenext>..that we might finally get a season 3 of Jericho ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..that we might finally get a season 3 of Jericho?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28733193</id>
	<title>Re:OMG!</title>
	<author>Darinbob</author>
	<datestamp>1247859960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd prefer to see some buffout patches for when I visit the gym, or some mentats for work, and stimpaks would be great when there's a knife stuck in me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd prefer to see some buffout patches for when I visit the gym , or some mentats for work , and stimpaks would be great when there 's a knife stuck in me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd prefer to see some buffout patches for when I visit the gym, or some mentats for work, and stimpaks would be great when there's a knife stuck in me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729915</id>
	<title>Possible fraud?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247845920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>Fraud?</b> Slashdot has run numerous articles about "scientific advances" by companies that want investments. Is Slashdot paid for those articles?

<br> <br>The article referenced in the Slashdot story, <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3748014,00.html" title="ynetnews.com">Cure for radiation sickness found?</a> [ynetnews.com] says:

<br> <br> <i>'The medication works by suppressing the "suicide mechanism" of cells hit by radiation, while enabling them to recover from the radiation-induced damages that prompted them to activate the suicide mechanism in the first place.'</i>

<br> <br>My opinion is that makes no sense. If a cell is damaged, and the body would normally eject the cell, a "protein" will not fix the damage. The cell will still be damaged, and will not be able to function normally.

<br> <br>Living cells are extraordinarily complicated. If they experience the widespread grossly applied damage caused by radiation, one protein certainly will not repair them.

<br> <br>The <a href="http://ir.cbiolabs.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=197090&amp;p=irol-irhome" title="cbiolabs.com">Cleveland BioLabs web site</a> [cbiolabs.com] says, as part of their logo, "Controlling Cell Death to Protect Human Life". The <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=CBLI#chart2:symbol=cbli;range=my;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=on;source=undefined" title="yahoo.com">stock reached a low of $1.34 on March 9, 2009, and is now at $4.41</a> [yahoo.com].

<br> <br>This article gives more information: <a href="http://www.vosizneias.com/35162/2009/07/16/cleveland-oh-report-jewish-doctor-in-ground-breaking-cure-cure-for-radiation-sickness/" title="vosizneias.com">Report: Jewish Doctor In Ground-Breaking Cure For Radiation Sickness</a> [vosizneias.com]. Quote: <i>"The company's subcontractor in Europe is already prepared to embark on mass production."</i>

<br> <br>I'm guessing that the company needs money to begin mass production. Also, it is interesting that an American company will not manufacture the drug in the United States. One reason for that may be that it takes years to get FDA approval from the U.S. federal government.</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fraud ?
Slashdot has run numerous articles about " scientific advances " by companies that want investments .
Is Slashdot paid for those articles ?
The article referenced in the Slashdot story , Cure for radiation sickness found ?
[ ynetnews.com ] says : 'The medication works by suppressing the " suicide mechanism " of cells hit by radiation , while enabling them to recover from the radiation-induced damages that prompted them to activate the suicide mechanism in the first place .
' My opinion is that makes no sense .
If a cell is damaged , and the body would normally eject the cell , a " protein " will not fix the damage .
The cell will still be damaged , and will not be able to function normally .
Living cells are extraordinarily complicated .
If they experience the widespread grossly applied damage caused by radiation , one protein certainly will not repair them .
The Cleveland BioLabs web site [ cbiolabs.com ] says , as part of their logo , " Controlling Cell Death to Protect Human Life " .
The stock reached a low of $ 1.34 on March 9 , 2009 , and is now at $ 4.41 [ yahoo.com ] .
This article gives more information : Report : Jewish Doctor In Ground-Breaking Cure For Radiation Sickness [ vosizneias.com ] .
Quote : " The company 's subcontractor in Europe is already prepared to embark on mass production .
" I 'm guessing that the company needs money to begin mass production .
Also , it is interesting that an American company will not manufacture the drug in the United States .
One reason for that may be that it takes years to get FDA approval from the U.S. federal government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fraud?
Slashdot has run numerous articles about "scientific advances" by companies that want investments.
Is Slashdot paid for those articles?
The article referenced in the Slashdot story, Cure for radiation sickness found?
[ynetnews.com] says:

  'The medication works by suppressing the "suicide mechanism" of cells hit by radiation, while enabling them to recover from the radiation-induced damages that prompted them to activate the suicide mechanism in the first place.
'

 My opinion is that makes no sense.
If a cell is damaged, and the body would normally eject the cell, a "protein" will not fix the damage.
The cell will still be damaged, and will not be able to function normally.
Living cells are extraordinarily complicated.
If they experience the widespread grossly applied damage caused by radiation, one protein certainly will not repair them.
The Cleveland BioLabs web site [cbiolabs.com] says, as part of their logo, "Controlling Cell Death to Protect Human Life".
The stock reached a low of $1.34 on March 9, 2009, and is now at $4.41 [yahoo.com].
This article gives more information: Report: Jewish Doctor In Ground-Breaking Cure For Radiation Sickness [vosizneias.com].
Quote: "The company's subcontractor in Europe is already prepared to embark on mass production.
"

 I'm guessing that the company needs money to begin mass production.
Also, it is interesting that an American company will not manufacture the drug in the United States.
One reason for that may be that it takes years to get FDA approval from the U.S. federal government.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729971</id>
	<title>Re:Suicidal cells</title>
	<author>MightyYar</author>
	<datestamp>1247846100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not quite right, IIRC. The problem is that the "cell suicide" (apoptosis) response is a very blunt instrument... many healthy cells die when there is a lot of apoptosis going on. Radiation exposure is not exactly something our immune system has evolved to cope with! Preventing apoptosis with this compound may increase the chance of cancer according to the researchers, but so far they have not observed this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not quite right , IIRC .
The problem is that the " cell suicide " ( apoptosis ) response is a very blunt instrument... many healthy cells die when there is a lot of apoptosis going on .
Radiation exposure is not exactly something our immune system has evolved to cope with !
Preventing apoptosis with this compound may increase the chance of cancer according to the researchers , but so far they have not observed this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not quite right, IIRC.
The problem is that the "cell suicide" (apoptosis) response is a very blunt instrument... many healthy cells die when there is a lot of apoptosis going on.
Radiation exposure is not exactly something our immune system has evolved to cope with!
Preventing apoptosis with this compound may increase the chance of cancer according to the researchers, but so far they have not observed this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729647</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28734289</id>
	<title>Mars Here We Come!</title>
	<author>Fieryphoenix</author>
	<datestamp>1247821860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hot damn, now we can make the trip alive!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hot damn , now we can make the trip alive !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hot damn, now we can make the trip alive!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729709</id>
	<title>Re:Oh good,</title>
	<author>Kell Bengal</author>
	<datestamp>1247845080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...may have far-reaching implications on the balance of power in the world, as states capable of providing their citizens with protection against radiation will enjoy a significant strategic advantage vis-&#195;-vis their rivals.</p></div><p>Yeah, see that bit of TFA bothered me a little.  What, so now states will consider nuking each other, just because the radiation won't kill us all?  I don't think so.</p><p>  There's a lot more going on when you nuke someone than just the leftover radiation.  Things like contamination of ground water, widespread destruction of ecology - all those things we need to live more than just a few days.</p><p>I understand why you're being sarcastic.  Certainly, that statement from the article is just glib flag waving; not thought out at all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...may have far-reaching implications on the balance of power in the world , as states capable of providing their citizens with protection against radiation will enjoy a significant strategic advantage vis-   -vis their rivals.Yeah , see that bit of TFA bothered me a little .
What , so now states will consider nuking each other , just because the radiation wo n't kill us all ?
I do n't think so .
There 's a lot more going on when you nuke someone than just the leftover radiation .
Things like contamination of ground water , widespread destruction of ecology - all those things we need to live more than just a few days.I understand why you 're being sarcastic .
Certainly , that statement from the article is just glib flag waving ; not thought out at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...may have far-reaching implications on the balance of power in the world, as states capable of providing their citizens with protection against radiation will enjoy a significant strategic advantage vis-Ã-vis their rivals.Yeah, see that bit of TFA bothered me a little.
What, so now states will consider nuking each other, just because the radiation won't kill us all?
I don't think so.
There's a lot more going on when you nuke someone than just the leftover radiation.
Things like contamination of ground water, widespread destruction of ecology - all those things we need to live more than just a few days.I understand why you're being sarcastic.
Certainly, that statement from the article is just glib flag waving; not thought out at all.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732349</id>
	<title>Re:Possible fraud?</title>
	<author>Sir\_Lewk</author>
	<datestamp>1247856060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"'The medication works by suppressing the "suicide mechanism" of cells"</i></p><p>IANAMD but to me that sounds like it'd actually <i>increase</i> your chances of cancer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" 'The medication works by suppressing the " suicide mechanism " of cells " IANAMD but to me that sounds like it 'd actually increase your chances of cancer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"'The medication works by suppressing the "suicide mechanism" of cells"IANAMD but to me that sounds like it'd actually increase your chances of cancer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729915</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729005</id>
	<title>Re:I need a car analogy...</title>
	<author>v1</author>
	<datestamp>1247842020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I wonder if this could be used to help cancer patients who are undergoing radiation treatment.</i></p><p>Radiation is a good way to <b>cause</b> cancer.  Radiation does damage not only to cell structures, but also does irreversible damage to DNA, which can cause cancer.  People being treated for severe radiation poisoning may survive only to find they are plagued by repeated development of cancerous tumors all over their body.</p><p>Alive still, but not nearly the rosegarden of living that the casual headline reader would envision.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this could be used to help cancer patients who are undergoing radiation treatment.Radiation is a good way to cause cancer .
Radiation does damage not only to cell structures , but also does irreversible damage to DNA , which can cause cancer .
People being treated for severe radiation poisoning may survive only to find they are plagued by repeated development of cancerous tumors all over their body.Alive still , but not nearly the rosegarden of living that the casual headline reader would envision .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if this could be used to help cancer patients who are undergoing radiation treatment.Radiation is a good way to cause cancer.
Radiation does damage not only to cell structures, but also does irreversible damage to DNA, which can cause cancer.
People being treated for severe radiation poisoning may survive only to find they are plagued by repeated development of cancerous tumors all over their body.Alive still, but not nearly the rosegarden of living that the casual headline reader would envision.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728985</id>
	<title>Re:I need a car analogy...</title>
	<author>Ihlosi</author>
	<datestamp>1247841960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Hell, it's early, so I may not be thinking correctly, but it seems to me like a little dose of this would go a long way to curing the horrible side effects of cancer treatment.</i> <p>

And possibly make the treatment quite ineffective, if it also works on cancer cells.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hell , it 's early , so I may not be thinking correctly , but it seems to me like a little dose of this would go a long way to curing the horrible side effects of cancer treatment .
And possibly make the treatment quite ineffective , if it also works on cancer cells .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hell, it's early, so I may not be thinking correctly, but it seems to me like a little dose of this would go a long way to curing the horrible side effects of cancer treatment.
And possibly make the treatment quite ineffective, if it also works on cancer cells.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728893</id>
	<title>Better Article &amp; 2008 Shareholder Report</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1247841600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>

There's <a href="http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/134269.php" title="medicalnewstoday.com" rel="nofollow">more information on Medical News today</a> [medicalnewstoday.com] if anyone wants a more medical take on this and a less<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Israeli interpretation (I don't know about you but I'm not too hung up on what nationality the researchers are and am more so interested in the technical details).  Their <a href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW50SUQ9MzM0NzI0fENoaWxkSUQ9MzE3ODg2fFR5cGU9MQ==&amp;t=1" title="corporate-ir.net" rel="nofollow">2008 annual report</a> [corporate-ir.net] sheds a lot of insight on this as well.  Although this information has been public knowledge since the beginning of the year, it should be <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ\%3ACBLI" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">interesting to watch their stock fluctuate</a> [google.com] throughout today.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's more information on Medical News today [ medicalnewstoday.com ] if anyone wants a more medical take on this and a less ... Israeli interpretation ( I do n't know about you but I 'm not too hung up on what nationality the researchers are and am more so interested in the technical details ) .
Their 2008 annual report [ corporate-ir.net ] sheds a lot of insight on this as well .
Although this information has been public knowledge since the beginning of the year , it should be interesting to watch their stock fluctuate [ google.com ] throughout today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>

There's more information on Medical News today [medicalnewstoday.com] if anyone wants a more medical take on this and a less ... Israeli interpretation (I don't know about you but I'm not too hung up on what nationality the researchers are and am more so interested in the technical details).
Their 2008 annual report [corporate-ir.net] sheds a lot of insight on this as well.
Although this information has been public knowledge since the beginning of the year, it should be interesting to watch their stock fluctuate [google.com] throughout today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731231</id>
	<title>Re:YNet isn't the only one who's picked it up..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247851320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>So you're saying in all those movies they're just saying things like, "Look out! It's the Sunday Gazette!", and proceed to be trampled by the business section?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So you 're saying in all those movies they 're just saying things like , " Look out !
It 's the Sunday Gazette !
" , and proceed to be trampled by the business section ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you're saying in all those movies they're just saying things like, "Look out!
It's the Sunday Gazette!
", and proceed to be trampled by the business section?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729015</id>
	<title>Re:OMG!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247842080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now we just need Rad-X</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now we just need Rad-X</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now we just need Rad-X</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728995</id>
	<title>Big Deal</title>
	<author>wwest4</author>
	<datestamp>1247842020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm waiting for the cure to hibernation sickness. I froze my little brother in a trash can back in 1983. Before I let him out, I want to make sure he's not blind for two days just in case my mom decides to cast us into the Pit of Carkoon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for the cure to hibernation sickness .
I froze my little brother in a trash can back in 1983 .
Before I let him out , I want to make sure he 's not blind for two days just in case my mom decides to cast us into the Pit of Carkoon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting for the cure to hibernation sickness.
I froze my little brother in a trash can back in 1983.
Before I let him out, I want to make sure he's not blind for two days just in case my mom decides to cast us into the Pit of Carkoon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729991</id>
	<title>Re:it stops apoptosis</title>
	<author>mindbrane</author>
	<datestamp>1247846220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not my bailiwick but apoptosis is an abiding interest of mine. There's a quirky, little, award winning film titled "Death by Design" that gives a descent intro. The overarching, take away message seems to be that cells run a self destruct programme when they stop receiving input requiring them to continue on with whatever it is there supposed to be doing. Apoptosis is fascinating stuff and interesting from an evolutionary viewpoint. Although it's bad news for nerds if positive, life affirming feedback is necessary to stop you from running a self destruct programme. Maybe your mom yelling down into the basement telling you to stop watching porn and playing with yourself is enough to stop your cells from popping. Maybe...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not my bailiwick but apoptosis is an abiding interest of mine .
There 's a quirky , little , award winning film titled " Death by Design " that gives a descent intro .
The overarching , take away message seems to be that cells run a self destruct programme when they stop receiving input requiring them to continue on with whatever it is there supposed to be doing .
Apoptosis is fascinating stuff and interesting from an evolutionary viewpoint .
Although it 's bad news for nerds if positive , life affirming feedback is necessary to stop you from running a self destruct programme .
Maybe your mom yelling down into the basement telling you to stop watching porn and playing with yourself is enough to stop your cells from popping .
Maybe.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not my bailiwick but apoptosis is an abiding interest of mine.
There's a quirky, little, award winning film titled "Death by Design" that gives a descent intro.
The overarching, take away message seems to be that cells run a self destruct programme when they stop receiving input requiring them to continue on with whatever it is there supposed to be doing.
Apoptosis is fascinating stuff and interesting from an evolutionary viewpoint.
Although it's bad news for nerds if positive, life affirming feedback is necessary to stop you from running a self destruct programme.
Maybe your mom yelling down into the basement telling you to stop watching porn and playing with yourself is enough to stop your cells from popping.
Maybe...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731839</id>
	<title>Re:I doubt it...</title>
	<author>Cedric Tsui</author>
	<datestamp>1247854020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The drug treats <b>acute</b> radiation sickness.<br> <br>

Huge doses of radiation has two effects on the body. One, it can jumble DNA causing mutations and increasing your lifelong risk of developing cancer. This drug does nothing to combat this. <br> <br>

Two, it jumbles up enough proteins that many cells undergo apoptosis. That means the cells commit suicide believing that they must be defective in some way for all this damage to be present. Thanks to all the holes where the dead cells were, bodily fluids start leaking through places they shouldn't... Like your intestines. This is what causes deaths within the first week or two following radiation exposure. <br> <br>

The drug treats the latter case by preventing apoptosis. <br>
Now, the fear is that this drug could increase the risk of developing cancer. Often, a cancerous cell is a perfectly normal one except for that fact that it ignores the body's instructions to commit suicide.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The drug treats acute radiation sickness .
Huge doses of radiation has two effects on the body .
One , it can jumble DNA causing mutations and increasing your lifelong risk of developing cancer .
This drug does nothing to combat this .
Two , it jumbles up enough proteins that many cells undergo apoptosis .
That means the cells commit suicide believing that they must be defective in some way for all this damage to be present .
Thanks to all the holes where the dead cells were , bodily fluids start leaking through places they should n't... Like your intestines .
This is what causes deaths within the first week or two following radiation exposure .
The drug treats the latter case by preventing apoptosis .
Now , the fear is that this drug could increase the risk of developing cancer .
Often , a cancerous cell is a perfectly normal one except for that fact that it ignores the body 's instructions to commit suicide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The drug treats acute radiation sickness.
Huge doses of radiation has two effects on the body.
One, it can jumble DNA causing mutations and increasing your lifelong risk of developing cancer.
This drug does nothing to combat this.
Two, it jumbles up enough proteins that many cells undergo apoptosis.
That means the cells commit suicide believing that they must be defective in some way for all this damage to be present.
Thanks to all the holes where the dead cells were, bodily fluids start leaking through places they shouldn't... Like your intestines.
This is what causes deaths within the first week or two following radiation exposure.
The drug treats the latter case by preventing apoptosis.
Now, the fear is that this drug could increase the risk of developing cancer.
Often, a cancerous cell is a perfectly normal one except for that fact that it ignores the body's instructions to commit suicide.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731401</id>
	<title>Re:Another success for VaulTec!</title>
	<author>francium de neobie</author>
	<datestamp>1247852160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Jet was invented by <a href="http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Myron" title="wikia.com">Myron</a> [wikia.com], VaultTec has nothing to do with it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jet was invented by Myron [ wikia.com ] , VaultTec has nothing to do with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jet was invented by Myron [wikia.com], VaultTec has nothing to do with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729321</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729799</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing in the article suggests a cancer cure.</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1247845380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There seems to be some confusion.  The radiation protectant drug is CBLB502, which was inspired by looking at how some cancer cells suppress apoptosis in response to radiation.  The same company has also announced promising phase II trials on CBLC102, a different drug that appears to do more or less the opposite - it turns on tumor suppression pathways that have been disabled in tumor cells and shuts down pro-cell survival mechanisms.</p><p>CBLB502: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7341336.stm" title="bbc.co.uk">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7341336.stm</a> [bbc.co.uk]</p><p>CBLC102: <a href="http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/134269.php" title="medicalnewstoday.com">http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/134269.php</a> [medicalnewstoday.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There seems to be some confusion .
The radiation protectant drug is CBLB502 , which was inspired by looking at how some cancer cells suppress apoptosis in response to radiation .
The same company has also announced promising phase II trials on CBLC102 , a different drug that appears to do more or less the opposite - it turns on tumor suppression pathways that have been disabled in tumor cells and shuts down pro-cell survival mechanisms.CBLB502 : http : //news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7341336.stm [ bbc.co.uk ] CBLC102 : http : //www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/134269.php [ medicalnewstoday.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There seems to be some confusion.
The radiation protectant drug is CBLB502, which was inspired by looking at how some cancer cells suppress apoptosis in response to radiation.
The same company has also announced promising phase II trials on CBLC102, a different drug that appears to do more or less the opposite - it turns on tumor suppression pathways that have been disabled in tumor cells and shuts down pro-cell survival mechanisms.CBLB502: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7341336.stm [bbc.co.uk]CBLC102: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/134269.php [medicalnewstoday.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729273</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728949</id>
	<title>Oh good,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247841840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now nuclear war won't be so bad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now nuclear war wo n't be so bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now nuclear war won't be so bad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728935</id>
	<title>So we can cure him?</title>
	<author>bytethese</author>
	<datestamp>1247841780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Someone get the Toxic Avenger on the phone...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone get the Toxic Avenger on the phone.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone get the Toxic Avenger on the phone...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731425</id>
	<title>Re:Won't fix DNA damage</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247852280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Long term effects are irrelevant. They want this for soldiers (as in, those who will be dropping the bombs and operating in contaminated territory). See <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/department-of-defense-releases-further-funding-to-cleveland-biolabs-under-88-million-contract-for-development-studies-on-protectan-cblb502" title="marketwatch.com" rel="nofollow">who</a> [marketwatch.com] is funding this research.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Long term effects are irrelevant .
They want this for soldiers ( as in , those who will be dropping the bombs and operating in contaminated territory ) .
See who [ marketwatch.com ] is funding this research .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Long term effects are irrelevant.
They want this for soldiers (as in, those who will be dropping the bombs and operating in contaminated territory).
See who [marketwatch.com] is funding this research.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731039</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing in the article suggests a cancer cure.</title>
	<author>xant</author>
	<datestamp>1247850540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm deeply skeptical about the claim itself, but if it's true, the "cure for cancer" the submitter is stumbling around is a reference to radiotherapy for cancer.  It's effective at killing cancer but, for obvious reasons, extraordinarily harsh on the rest of the body.  If there were a way to heal the rest of the body while the cancer dies from the radiation, you have a cure for many kinds of cancer.  Of course, even if the drug described does protect you from radiation damage, it probably protects the cancer cells too.  But we'll see.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm deeply skeptical about the claim itself , but if it 's true , the " cure for cancer " the submitter is stumbling around is a reference to radiotherapy for cancer .
It 's effective at killing cancer but , for obvious reasons , extraordinarily harsh on the rest of the body .
If there were a way to heal the rest of the body while the cancer dies from the radiation , you have a cure for many kinds of cancer .
Of course , even if the drug described does protect you from radiation damage , it probably protects the cancer cells too .
But we 'll see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm deeply skeptical about the claim itself, but if it's true, the "cure for cancer" the submitter is stumbling around is a reference to radiotherapy for cancer.
It's effective at killing cancer but, for obvious reasons, extraordinarily harsh on the rest of the body.
If there were a way to heal the rest of the body while the cancer dies from the radiation, you have a cure for many kinds of cancer.
Of course, even if the drug described does protect you from radiation damage, it probably protects the cancer cells too.
But we'll see.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729273</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731981</id>
	<title>Re:72 hours after exposure?</title>
	<author>eth1</author>
	<datestamp>1247854560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even if it does have a high chance of causing cancer the choice is still between a 100\% chance of death in a few days from acute radiation sickness, or a 100\% chance of death sometime in the future from cancer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if it does have a high chance of causing cancer the choice is still between a 100 \ % chance of death in a few days from acute radiation sickness , or a 100 \ % chance of death sometime in the future from cancer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if it does have a high chance of causing cancer the choice is still between a 100\% chance of death in a few days from acute radiation sickness, or a 100\% chance of death sometime in the future from cancer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729409</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731049</id>
	<title>Re:I doubt it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247850540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you had at least read the summary... They are talking about preventing radiation-induced damage by taking the substance <i>before</i> exposure. They are not claiming it will fix the damage after the fact. A vaccine of sorts, if you will.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you had at least read the summary... They are talking about preventing radiation-induced damage by taking the substance before exposure .
They are not claiming it will fix the damage after the fact .
A vaccine of sorts , if you will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you had at least read the summary... They are talking about preventing radiation-induced damage by taking the substance before exposure.
They are not claiming it will fix the damage after the fact.
A vaccine of sorts, if you will.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28734179</id>
	<title>Re:I need a car analogy...</title>
	<author>bugs2squash</author>
	<datestamp>1247821320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OK - here's my car analogy (even if you were just kidding)...<br>
A company owned by GM publishes some preliminary results that a new fuel additive looks like it might turn an ordinary SUV gas guzzler into a 250-mile-per-gallon ecologist dream. The additive shows promise in early tests but is not ready for market yet.<br>
It's not necessary that it work, it is only necessary that enough people beleive that it could work to drive a spike in SUV sales and revive GM's fortunes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>OK - here 's my car analogy ( even if you were just kidding ) .. . A company owned by GM publishes some preliminary results that a new fuel additive looks like it might turn an ordinary SUV gas guzzler into a 250-mile-per-gallon ecologist dream .
The additive shows promise in early tests but is not ready for market yet .
It 's not necessary that it work , it is only necessary that enough people beleive that it could work to drive a spike in SUV sales and revive GM 's fortunes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK - here's my car analogy (even if you were just kidding)...
A company owned by GM publishes some preliminary results that a new fuel additive looks like it might turn an ordinary SUV gas guzzler into a 250-mile-per-gallon ecologist dream.
The additive shows promise in early tests but is not ready for market yet.
It's not necessary that it work, it is only necessary that enough people beleive that it could work to drive a spike in SUV sales and revive GM's fortunes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729723</id>
	<title>Re:650 + monkeys ?</title>
	<author>TaggartAleslayer</author>
	<datestamp>1247845140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The BBC <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7341336.stm" title="bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7341336.stm</a> [bbc.co.uk] has a less biased and dodgy article that explains it in more believable terms.<br> <br>
I don't doubt the number of lab animals mentioned simply due to the many years this has been in development and the extreme interest and funding from the US and Israili governments.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The BBC http : //news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7341336.stm [ bbc.co.uk ] has a less biased and dodgy article that explains it in more believable terms .
I do n't doubt the number of lab animals mentioned simply due to the many years this has been in development and the extreme interest and funding from the US and Israili governments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7341336.stm [bbc.co.uk] has a less biased and dodgy article that explains it in more believable terms.
I don't doubt the number of lab animals mentioned simply due to the many years this has been in development and the extreme interest and funding from the US and Israili governments.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730001</id>
	<title>Re:650 + monkeys ?</title>
	<author>cnettel</author>
	<datestamp>1247846280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>600+ mice would not be out of the ordinary at all. Remember that, whatever species they use, there are subgroups. The article states "experiments" on 650+ monkeys. Note the plural. They also note that they obviously tested different times of administration, from -24 to +72 hours. To do that, and to maintain significance within each group, you might end up in a number like this, especially if the Chernobyl-like dose was a maximum rather than the only dose tested. You might even vary the dose of the compound. So, you would test administration time, possibly administration method, radiation dosage. But, yes, it means that they have a quite strong source of funding, but considering the military connection suggested in the article, that doesn't seem impossible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>600 + mice would not be out of the ordinary at all .
Remember that , whatever species they use , there are subgroups .
The article states " experiments " on 650 + monkeys .
Note the plural .
They also note that they obviously tested different times of administration , from -24 to + 72 hours .
To do that , and to maintain significance within each group , you might end up in a number like this , especially if the Chernobyl-like dose was a maximum rather than the only dose tested .
You might even vary the dose of the compound .
So , you would test administration time , possibly administration method , radiation dosage .
But , yes , it means that they have a quite strong source of funding , but considering the military connection suggested in the article , that does n't seem impossible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>600+ mice would not be out of the ordinary at all.
Remember that, whatever species they use, there are subgroups.
The article states "experiments" on 650+ monkeys.
Note the plural.
They also note that they obviously tested different times of administration, from -24 to +72 hours.
To do that, and to maintain significance within each group, you might end up in a number like this, especially if the Chernobyl-like dose was a maximum rather than the only dose tested.
You might even vary the dose of the compound.
So, you would test administration time, possibly administration method, radiation dosage.
But, yes, it means that they have a quite strong source of funding, but considering the military connection suggested in the article, that doesn't seem impossible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729215</id>
	<title>Re:Won't fix DNA damage</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1247842920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Essentially everyone, if they don't get have a heart attack, kiss a bus, or otherwise snuff it early, will eventually succumb to cancer. Assuming this stuff isn't extraordinarily expensive or incredibly nasty in some other way, "survival now, cancer later" would be a good deal for all but the oldest radiation exposure victims.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Essentially everyone , if they do n't get have a heart attack , kiss a bus , or otherwise snuff it early , will eventually succumb to cancer .
Assuming this stuff is n't extraordinarily expensive or incredibly nasty in some other way , " survival now , cancer later " would be a good deal for all but the oldest radiation exposure victims .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Essentially everyone, if they don't get have a heart attack, kiss a bus, or otherwise snuff it early, will eventually succumb to cancer.
Assuming this stuff isn't extraordinarily expensive or incredibly nasty in some other way, "survival now, cancer later" would be a good deal for all but the oldest radiation exposure victims.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728963</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730353</id>
	<title>Cell death?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247847720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember reading that upon trying to resuscitate someone, it was resupply oxygen to the oxygen deprived cells that triggered the cells' suicide mechanisms and made resuscitation impossible. The article seemed to suggest inducing hypothermia into the person before slowly reapply oxygen allowed them to be resuscitated after longer periods of time than usual. I wonder if this protein would achieve the same effect, if it is indeed the restoration of oxygen that triggers this mechanism, then this protein may block that, keeping the cells intact.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember reading that upon trying to resuscitate someone , it was resupply oxygen to the oxygen deprived cells that triggered the cells ' suicide mechanisms and made resuscitation impossible .
The article seemed to suggest inducing hypothermia into the person before slowly reapply oxygen allowed them to be resuscitated after longer periods of time than usual .
I wonder if this protein would achieve the same effect , if it is indeed the restoration of oxygen that triggers this mechanism , then this protein may block that , keeping the cells intact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember reading that upon trying to resuscitate someone, it was resupply oxygen to the oxygen deprived cells that triggered the cells' suicide mechanisms and made resuscitation impossible.
The article seemed to suggest inducing hypothermia into the person before slowly reapply oxygen allowed them to be resuscitated after longer periods of time than usual.
I wonder if this protein would achieve the same effect, if it is indeed the restoration of oxygen that triggers this mechanism, then this protein may block that, keeping the cells intact.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731431</id>
	<title>Re:OMG!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247852280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LOL<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. that's exactly what I thought when I first read the story. That's great.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL .. that 's exactly what I thought when I first read the story .
That 's great .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL .. that's exactly what I thought when I first read the story.
That's great.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28734709</id>
	<title>Re:YNet isn't the only one who's picked it up..</title>
	<author>slasho81</author>
	<datestamp>1247823480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I can vouch for the site and newspaper's credibility</p></div></blockquote><p>

An Anonymous Coward vouching for a newspaper's credibility. Very credible.
<br>
Yedioth Achronoth along with its YNet website is the paper with the largest circulation in Israel for the same reason other newspapers around the world gain popularity - very "yellow" infortainment. It is hardly credible. The NYTimes Israeli equivalent newspaper in Israel is Haaretz.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can vouch for the site and newspaper 's credibility An Anonymous Coward vouching for a newspaper 's credibility .
Very credible .
Yedioth Achronoth along with its YNet website is the paper with the largest circulation in Israel for the same reason other newspapers around the world gain popularity - very " yellow " infortainment .
It is hardly credible .
The NYTimes Israeli equivalent newspaper in Israel is Haaretz .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can vouch for the site and newspaper's credibility

An Anonymous Coward vouching for a newspaper's credibility.
Very credible.
Yedioth Achronoth along with its YNet website is the paper with the largest circulation in Israel for the same reason other newspapers around the world gain popularity - very "yellow" infortainment.
It is hardly credible.
The NYTimes Israeli equivalent newspaper in Israel is Haaretz.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729641</id>
	<title>LMGTFY (Re:I doubt it...)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247844780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No publication in a real scientific or medical journal.</p></div><p>LMGTFY:</p><p>http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andrei+Gudkov</p><p>gives more than 600 results, including papers in Nature and Science.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No publication in a real scientific or medical journal.LMGTFY : http : //scholar.google.com/scholar ? q = Andrei + Gudkovgives more than 600 results , including papers in Nature and Science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No publication in a real scientific or medical journal.LMGTFY:http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andrei+Gudkovgives more than 600 results, including papers in Nature and Science.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728899</id>
	<title>RadAway</title>
	<author>Arthurio</author>
	<datestamp>1247841660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Finally we'll have RadAway!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Now all we need is a good old nuclear fallout and the world will be perfect.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally we 'll have RadAway !
... Now all we need is a good old nuclear fallout and the world will be perfect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally we'll have RadAway!
... Now all we need is a good old nuclear fallout and the world will be perfect.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730671</id>
	<title>Re:I doubt it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247849040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are particles bombarding cells all day long.  Cell repair and DNA repair are a built-in part of the whole process.  I wouldn't be surprised at all if billions of years of evolution have produced numerous mechanisms to deal with even drastic cell damage.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I really doubt a magic bullet can exist for the many types of cellular damage that can occur in different body systems.</p></div><p>Your doubt is better backed by your personality than by your understanding in science.  Of course there is no "magic bullet" for radiation treatment.  There is no "magic bullet" for treating burns either - because falling into a pit of lava is different than getting a sun burn after an hour of exposure on the beach.  So, should we stop using sun screen because it isn't effective in treating dips in lava pools?</p><p>The fact of the matter is, the vast majority of cases of radiation damaged cells comes from medical therapies.  If this protein is effective in reducing the damage and increasing the recovery, it should be taken seriously.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are particles bombarding cells all day long .
Cell repair and DNA repair are a built-in part of the whole process .
I would n't be surprised at all if billions of years of evolution have produced numerous mechanisms to deal with even drastic cell damage.I really doubt a magic bullet can exist for the many types of cellular damage that can occur in different body systems.Your doubt is better backed by your personality than by your understanding in science .
Of course there is no " magic bullet " for radiation treatment .
There is no " magic bullet " for treating burns either - because falling into a pit of lava is different than getting a sun burn after an hour of exposure on the beach .
So , should we stop using sun screen because it is n't effective in treating dips in lava pools ? The fact of the matter is , the vast majority of cases of radiation damaged cells comes from medical therapies .
If this protein is effective in reducing the damage and increasing the recovery , it should be taken seriously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are particles bombarding cells all day long.
Cell repair and DNA repair are a built-in part of the whole process.
I wouldn't be surprised at all if billions of years of evolution have produced numerous mechanisms to deal with even drastic cell damage.I really doubt a magic bullet can exist for the many types of cellular damage that can occur in different body systems.Your doubt is better backed by your personality than by your understanding in science.
Of course there is no "magic bullet" for radiation treatment.
There is no "magic bullet" for treating burns either - because falling into a pit of lava is different than getting a sun burn after an hour of exposure on the beach.
So, should we stop using sun screen because it isn't effective in treating dips in lava pools?The fact of the matter is, the vast majority of cases of radiation damaged cells comes from medical therapies.
If this protein is effective in reducing the damage and increasing the recovery, it should be taken seriously.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728977</id>
	<title>Just In Time For :</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247841960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>nuking Iran.</p><p>Why is Hilary Clinton upset with North Korea having nuclear weapons but is not upset with Israel having nuclear weapons?</p><p>Yours In Peace,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>nuking Iran.Why is Hilary Clinton upset with North Korea having nuclear weapons but is not upset with Israel having nuclear weapons ? Yours In Peace,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nuking Iran.Why is Hilary Clinton upset with North Korea having nuclear weapons but is not upset with Israel having nuclear weapons?Yours In Peace,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731237</id>
	<title>Re:Another success for VaulTec!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247851320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given the forum, Mentats are curiously absent from your list.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given the forum , Mentats are curiously absent from your list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given the forum, Mentats are curiously absent from your list.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729321</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729743</id>
	<title>Sounds like science fiction</title>
	<author>HollyMolly-1122</author>
	<datestamp>1247845200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>As far as I know, radiation damages cells physically. Is it possible with chemical treatment to cure every and each such cell ? Sounds like science fiction.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As far as I know , radiation damages cells physically .
Is it possible with chemical treatment to cure every and each such cell ?
Sounds like science fiction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As far as I know, radiation damages cells physically.
Is it possible with chemical treatment to cure every and each such cell ?
Sounds like science fiction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728963</id>
	<title>Won't fix DNA damage</title>
	<author>Maximum Prophet</author>
	<datestamp>1247841900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This would be great in that it keeps you alive in the immediate future, but there's no way it could fix all the subtle DNA damage that could give you cancer later.  Also, women have all the eggs they'll ever have, and any damage to them would be permanent.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This would be great in that it keeps you alive in the immediate future , but there 's no way it could fix all the subtle DNA damage that could give you cancer later .
Also , women have all the eggs they 'll ever have , and any damage to them would be permanent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would be great in that it keeps you alive in the immediate future, but there's no way it could fix all the subtle DNA damage that could give you cancer later.
Also, women have all the eggs they'll ever have, and any damage to them would be permanent.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732955</id>
	<title>Re:I doubt it...</title>
	<author>datababe72</author>
	<datestamp>1247858760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, they <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/sci;320/5873/226?maxtoshow=&amp;HITS=10&amp;hits=10&amp;RESULTFORMAT=&amp;fulltext=CBLB502&amp;searchid=1&amp;FIRSTINDEX=0&amp;resourcetype=HWCIT" title="sciencemag.org">published the work in Science</a> [sciencemag.org].</p><p>I think you can read the abstract there without a subscription. If you can't, you can go to <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=PubMed" title="nih.gov">PubMed</a> [nih.gov] and search for 18403709 (that's the PMID).</p><p>You can't really call publishing in Science not publishing in a real scientific journal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , they published the work in Science [ sciencemag.org ] .I think you can read the abstract there without a subscription .
If you ca n't , you can go to PubMed [ nih.gov ] and search for 18403709 ( that 's the PMID ) .You ca n't really call publishing in Science not publishing in a real scientific journal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, they published the work in Science [sciencemag.org].I think you can read the abstract there without a subscription.
If you can't, you can go to PubMed [nih.gov] and search for 18403709 (that's the PMID).You can't really call publishing in Science not publishing in a real scientific journal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28735745</id>
	<title>Re:Fallout</title>
	<author>pbhj</author>
	<datestamp>1247829780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is Becquerel-be-gone taken?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is Becquerel-be-gone taken ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is Becquerel-be-gone taken?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729435</id>
	<title>Re:it stops apoptosis</title>
	<author>oneirophrenos</author>
	<datestamp>1247843820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Developing mutations that enable tumour cells to evade apoptosis is one of the crucial methods by which they achieve malignacy. If we introduce a drug that prevents a cell from committing suicide after irrevocable genetic damage, we significantly increase the odds of cancer. That drug is, effectively, a carcinogen. However, if the alternative is death from the stochastic effects of radiation exposure, maybe the drastic increasing in cancer probability is an acceptable downside.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Developing mutations that enable tumour cells to evade apoptosis is one of the crucial methods by which they achieve malignacy .
If we introduce a drug that prevents a cell from committing suicide after irrevocable genetic damage , we significantly increase the odds of cancer .
That drug is , effectively , a carcinogen .
However , if the alternative is death from the stochastic effects of radiation exposure , maybe the drastic increasing in cancer probability is an acceptable downside .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Developing mutations that enable tumour cells to evade apoptosis is one of the crucial methods by which they achieve malignacy.
If we introduce a drug that prevents a cell from committing suicide after irrevocable genetic damage, we significantly increase the odds of cancer.
That drug is, effectively, a carcinogen.
However, if the alternative is death from the stochastic effects of radiation exposure, maybe the drastic increasing in cancer probability is an acceptable downside.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730211</id>
	<title>thanks</title>
	<author>aytac</author>
	<datestamp>1247847240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.frmclass.com/" title="frmclass.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.frmclass.com/</a> [frmclass.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.frmclass.com/ [ frmclass.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.frmclass.com/ [frmclass.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731507</id>
	<title>Understand the sociological background.</title>
	<author>Futurepower(R)</author>
	<datestamp>1247852640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Understand the sociological background.

Briefly, the situation is apparently this, in my opinion:

<br> <br>In recent past years, there was extensive TV footage of Israeli-owned U.S.-made <a href="http://palestineinformation.org/divest.htm" title="palestineinformation.org">Blackhawk helicopters</a> [palestineinformation.org] operated by Jews firing at Palestinians on the ground throwing rocks. I saw that numerous times on TV. The footage was apparently taken from Blackhawk gun cameras, apparently by people who disagreed with the violence. Now, however, apparently because of the negative reaction, such footage is no longer shown.

<br> <br>The TV coverage upset 3 groups of people:

<br> <br>1) Arabs and Muslims. There are 1.1 billion of them, and they don't like being killed. Note that, in the entire world, there are an estimated 14 million Jews.

<br> <br>2) U.S. taxpayers. The money to buy the helicopters was apparently available due to U.S. government corruption. The U.S. government gives billions of dollars of taxpayer money to Israel every year, with the understanding that the money will be used to buy U.S.-made weapons. That is very profitable, apparently, since the Israelis are not in a position to negotiate a low price.

<br> <br>3) Jews who don't like the violence. There are Jews who think the violence will eventually be bad for all Jews everywhere. One Jewish leader said that the weapons were like throwing gasoline on a fire.

<br> <br>The first group has often threatened violence in return. Iranians, for example, have threatened Israel. This threat has been exaggerated by people in the U.S. who want to profit from another war.

<br> <br>Some Jews in Israel feel frightened by the threats from Iran. If there is a nuclear attack on Israel, a simple chemical that could repair radiation damage done to the body would be very popular. Any company offering such a chemical could expect plenty of investment by Israelis.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Understand the sociological background .
Briefly , the situation is apparently this , in my opinion : In recent past years , there was extensive TV footage of Israeli-owned U.S.-made Blackhawk helicopters [ palestineinformation.org ] operated by Jews firing at Palestinians on the ground throwing rocks .
I saw that numerous times on TV .
The footage was apparently taken from Blackhawk gun cameras , apparently by people who disagreed with the violence .
Now , however , apparently because of the negative reaction , such footage is no longer shown .
The TV coverage upset 3 groups of people : 1 ) Arabs and Muslims .
There are 1.1 billion of them , and they do n't like being killed .
Note that , in the entire world , there are an estimated 14 million Jews .
2 ) U.S. taxpayers. The money to buy the helicopters was apparently available due to U.S. government corruption .
The U.S. government gives billions of dollars of taxpayer money to Israel every year , with the understanding that the money will be used to buy U.S.-made weapons .
That is very profitable , apparently , since the Israelis are not in a position to negotiate a low price .
3 ) Jews who do n't like the violence .
There are Jews who think the violence will eventually be bad for all Jews everywhere .
One Jewish leader said that the weapons were like throwing gasoline on a fire .
The first group has often threatened violence in return .
Iranians , for example , have threatened Israel .
This threat has been exaggerated by people in the U.S. who want to profit from another war .
Some Jews in Israel feel frightened by the threats from Iran .
If there is a nuclear attack on Israel , a simple chemical that could repair radiation damage done to the body would be very popular .
Any company offering such a chemical could expect plenty of investment by Israelis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Understand the sociological background.
Briefly, the situation is apparently this, in my opinion:

 In recent past years, there was extensive TV footage of Israeli-owned U.S.-made Blackhawk helicopters [palestineinformation.org] operated by Jews firing at Palestinians on the ground throwing rocks.
I saw that numerous times on TV.
The footage was apparently taken from Blackhawk gun cameras, apparently by people who disagreed with the violence.
Now, however, apparently because of the negative reaction, such footage is no longer shown.
The TV coverage upset 3 groups of people:

 1) Arabs and Muslims.
There are 1.1 billion of them, and they don't like being killed.
Note that, in the entire world, there are an estimated 14 million Jews.
2) U.S. taxpayers. The money to buy the helicopters was apparently available due to U.S. government corruption.
The U.S. government gives billions of dollars of taxpayer money to Israel every year, with the understanding that the money will be used to buy U.S.-made weapons.
That is very profitable, apparently, since the Israelis are not in a position to negotiate a low price.
3) Jews who don't like the violence.
There are Jews who think the violence will eventually be bad for all Jews everywhere.
One Jewish leader said that the weapons were like throwing gasoline on a fire.
The first group has often threatened violence in return.
Iranians, for example, have threatened Israel.
This threat has been exaggerated by people in the U.S. who want to profit from another war.
Some Jews in Israel feel frightened by the threats from Iran.
If there is a nuclear attack on Israel, a simple chemical that could repair radiation damage done to the body would be very popular.
Any company offering such a chemical could expect plenty of investment by Israelis.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729321</id>
	<title>Another success for VaulTec!</title>
	<author>Drakkenmensch</author>
	<datestamp>1247843340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>With Rad-Away ready for store shelves, Stimpacks, BuffOut and Jet are on the way to phase 3 trials.</htmltext>
<tokenext>With Rad-Away ready for store shelves , Stimpacks , BuffOut and Jet are on the way to phase 3 trials .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With Rad-Away ready for store shelves, Stimpacks, BuffOut and Jet are on the way to phase 3 trials.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729921</id>
	<title>Relevance of ethnic background in science?</title>
	<author>GRW</author>
	<datestamp>1247845920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This article seems to put an emphasis on the scientists ethnicity.  Why is a scientists ethnic background relevant to a scientific discovery?  If the scientists in question were Arab-Americans, would this news site have treated the news differently?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This article seems to put an emphasis on the scientists ethnicity .
Why is a scientists ethnic background relevant to a scientific discovery ?
If the scientists in question were Arab-Americans , would this news site have treated the news differently ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This article seems to put an emphasis on the scientists ethnicity.
Why is a scientists ethnic background relevant to a scientific discovery?
If the scientists in question were Arab-Americans, would this news site have treated the news differently?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730063</id>
	<title>Re:That's silly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247846520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why bother with miracle drugs when all you need to protect yourself from radiation is to duck underneath a flimsy wooden desk and cover your head with your hands?</p></div><p>No, that's to protect you from the flash that you see outside the window, not radiation.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why bother with miracle drugs when all you need to protect yourself from radiation is to duck underneath a flimsy wooden desk and cover your head with your hands ? No , that 's to protect you from the flash that you see outside the window , not radiation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why bother with miracle drugs when all you need to protect yourself from radiation is to duck underneath a flimsy wooden desk and cover your head with your hands?No, that's to protect you from the flash that you see outside the window, not radiation.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729537</id>
	<title>Re:Better Article &amp; 2008 Shareholder Report</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247844360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>That Medical News Today article is about a different set of experimental drugs from the same company.  The article is also from January.  It is interesting though that Cleveland BioLabs is basically developing drugs that work on the process of apoptosis in opposite ways.  The "Curaxins" described in the Medical News Today article are cancer drugs that promote apoptosis, while CBLB502, their experimental anti-radiation damge drug, seems to work to prevent it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That Medical News Today article is about a different set of experimental drugs from the same company .
The article is also from January .
It is interesting though that Cleveland BioLabs is basically developing drugs that work on the process of apoptosis in opposite ways .
The " Curaxins " described in the Medical News Today article are cancer drugs that promote apoptosis , while CBLB502 , their experimental anti-radiation damge drug , seems to work to prevent it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That Medical News Today article is about a different set of experimental drugs from the same company.
The article is also from January.
It is interesting though that Cleveland BioLabs is basically developing drugs that work on the process of apoptosis in opposite ways.
The "Curaxins" described in the Medical News Today article are cancer drugs that promote apoptosis, while CBLB502, their experimental anti-radiation damge drug, seems to work to prevent it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729359</id>
	<title>Hulk?</title>
	<author>Gothmolly</author>
	<datestamp>1247843520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So this potion will allow me to survive long enough to gain super powers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So this potion will allow me to survive long enough to gain super powers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So this potion will allow me to survive long enough to gain super powers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729001</id>
	<title>Smoke 'em if you got 'em</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247842020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be really funny if the only way to get it into your system effectively would be through smoking the drug as in the movie "Screamers". A good sci-fi movie if you haven't seen it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be really funny if the only way to get it into your system effectively would be through smoking the drug as in the movie " Screamers " .
A good sci-fi movie if you have n't seen it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be really funny if the only way to get it into your system effectively would be through smoking the drug as in the movie "Screamers".
A good sci-fi movie if you haven't seen it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730007</id>
	<title>Yay!</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1247846280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This news gives me a happy blue glow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This news gives me a happy blue glow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This news gives me a happy blue glow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729275</id>
	<title>cell suicide is done</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1247843160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for many reasons, but a not unimportant reason is to protect the rest of the organism from the cell possibly becoming cancerous (tiny chance, but stacks up with enough radiation exposure to enough cells)</p><p>so if cell suicide is prevented, expect an increase in various cancer rates weeks or months after initial radiation exposure</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for many reasons , but a not unimportant reason is to protect the rest of the organism from the cell possibly becoming cancerous ( tiny chance , but stacks up with enough radiation exposure to enough cells ) so if cell suicide is prevented , expect an increase in various cancer rates weeks or months after initial radiation exposure</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for many reasons, but a not unimportant reason is to protect the rest of the organism from the cell possibly becoming cancerous (tiny chance, but stacks up with enough radiation exposure to enough cells)so if cell suicide is prevented, expect an increase in various cancer rates weeks or months after initial radiation exposure</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729379</id>
	<title>650 + monkeys ?</title>
	<author>PrinceAshitaka</author>
	<datestamp>1247843640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would doubt it. This would be far beyond what would be nessesary for statistically significant data and monkeys are expensive. If teh report got one detail wrong, what else is wrong with what was reported. I doubt they would even do 600+ mice or rats. That is just too high a number. I have my doubts about this report.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would doubt it .
This would be far beyond what would be nessesary for statistically significant data and monkeys are expensive .
If teh report got one detail wrong , what else is wrong with what was reported .
I doubt they would even do 600 + mice or rats .
That is just too high a number .
I have my doubts about this report .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would doubt it.
This would be far beyond what would be nessesary for statistically significant data and monkeys are expensive.
If teh report got one detail wrong, what else is wrong with what was reported.
I doubt they would even do 600+ mice or rats.
That is just too high a number.
I have my doubts about this report.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732273</id>
	<title>cells have anti-radiation mechanisms</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1247855820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cells first developed radiation damage mechanism to repair UV damage.  When photsynthesis evolved, cells wanted to get closer to the sun, yet avoid the effects of UV radiation in an Earth lacking an ozone layer.  Ozone depends on free oxygen in the atmosphere which was scarce in the first half of Earth history.
<br> <br>
The second inducement was the incorporation of mitochrondria into eucharyote cells. This gave cells ten times the energy they had before to eventually power animal locomotion. However, mitochrondria spew out all kinds of nasty poisons like free oxygen, protons, and high electric fields.  Cells had to develop mechanisms to neutralize these.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cells first developed radiation damage mechanism to repair UV damage .
When photsynthesis evolved , cells wanted to get closer to the sun , yet avoid the effects of UV radiation in an Earth lacking an ozone layer .
Ozone depends on free oxygen in the atmosphere which was scarce in the first half of Earth history .
The second inducement was the incorporation of mitochrondria into eucharyote cells .
This gave cells ten times the energy they had before to eventually power animal locomotion .
However , mitochrondria spew out all kinds of nasty poisons like free oxygen , protons , and high electric fields .
Cells had to develop mechanisms to neutralize these .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cells first developed radiation damage mechanism to repair UV damage.
When photsynthesis evolved, cells wanted to get closer to the sun, yet avoid the effects of UV radiation in an Earth lacking an ozone layer.
Ozone depends on free oxygen in the atmosphere which was scarce in the first half of Earth history.
The second inducement was the incorporation of mitochrondria into eucharyote cells.
This gave cells ten times the energy they had before to eventually power animal locomotion.
However, mitochrondria spew out all kinds of nasty poisons like free oxygen, protons, and high electric fields.
Cells had to develop mechanisms to neutralize these.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731665</id>
	<title>Talk about stuck between a rock and a hard place..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247853300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On one hand you will die after being miserably sick from the effects of radiation poisoning, or you could survive that just to endure years of harsh chemo treatments in the very likely chance that you develop cancer somewhere in the body. Even if you live through both events and survive, will it have really been more forgiving to just succumb to the radiation poisoning in the first place?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On one hand you will die after being miserably sick from the effects of radiation poisoning , or you could survive that just to endure years of harsh chemo treatments in the very likely chance that you develop cancer somewhere in the body .
Even if you live through both events and survive , will it have really been more forgiving to just succumb to the radiation poisoning in the first place ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On one hand you will die after being miserably sick from the effects of radiation poisoning, or you could survive that just to endure years of harsh chemo treatments in the very likely chance that you develop cancer somewhere in the body.
Even if you live through both events and survive, will it have really been more forgiving to just succumb to the radiation poisoning in the first place?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28733823</id>
	<title>Beginnings of the Zombie apocalypse?:</title>
	<author>coolamber</author>
	<datestamp>1247862960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is the company called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umbrella\_Corporation" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Umbrella</a> [wikipedia.org] by any chance?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is the company called Umbrella [ wikipedia.org ] by any chance ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is the company called Umbrella [wikipedia.org] by any chance?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732059</id>
	<title>Re:72 hours after exposure?</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1247854920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or maybe, as you wean off the drug, the cells will just die and be replaced at a manageable rate, instead of all at once. Which would mean that you as a whole would survive acute radiation poisoning, and the damaged cells still wouldn't. It's not all gloom and doom.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or maybe , as you wean off the drug , the cells will just die and be replaced at a manageable rate , instead of all at once .
Which would mean that you as a whole would survive acute radiation poisoning , and the damaged cells still would n't .
It 's not all gloom and doom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or maybe, as you wean off the drug, the cells will just die and be replaced at a manageable rate, instead of all at once.
Which would mean that you as a whole would survive acute radiation poisoning, and the damaged cells still wouldn't.
It's not all gloom and doom.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729409</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729389</id>
	<title>Fallout, here we come.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247843640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds a lot like Rad-X.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds a lot like Rad-X .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds a lot like Rad-X.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729647</id>
	<title>Re:Suicidal cells</title>
	<author>AndrewNeo</author>
	<datestamp>1247844840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some of the above comments state that the supression instead causes cell death, which then allows non-broken cells to properly replace them. The damaged cells will die, not recover.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some of the above comments state that the supression instead causes cell death , which then allows non-broken cells to properly replace them .
The damaged cells will die , not recover .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some of the above comments state that the supression instead causes cell death, which then allows non-broken cells to properly replace them.
The damaged cells will die, not recover.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732283</id>
	<title>Re:I doubt it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247855880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/sci;320/5873/226</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/sci ; 320/5873/226</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/sci;320/5873/226</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729499</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732149</id>
	<title>I wonder ...</title>
	<author>SlashDev</author>
	<datestamp>1247855280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>.. if a person is bombarded with radiation, do they carry it as well? Meaning, If that person is injected with that radioprotectant, can they affect other people that are not injected with the same radioprotectant?</htmltext>
<tokenext>.. if a person is bombarded with radiation , do they carry it as well ?
Meaning , If that person is injected with that radioprotectant , can they affect other people that are not injected with the same radioprotectant ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. if a person is bombarded with radiation, do they carry it as well?
Meaning, If that person is injected with that radioprotectant, can they affect other people that are not injected with the same radioprotectant?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728945</id>
	<title>That's silly</title>
	<author>Minwee</author>
	<datestamp>1247841840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why bother with miracle drugs when all you need to protect yourself from radiation is to duck underneath a flimsy wooden desk and cover your head with your hands?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why bother with miracle drugs when all you need to protect yourself from radiation is to duck underneath a flimsy wooden desk and cover your head with your hands ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why bother with miracle drugs when all you need to protect yourself from radiation is to duck underneath a flimsy wooden desk and cover your head with your hands?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732681</id>
	<title>Re:Possible fraud?</title>
	<author>osu-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1247857620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>My opinion is that makes no sense.</p></div><p>That's nice.  May I ask what your academic credentials are, and what research studies you've published or been involved with that would make your opinion better informed than asking my cat what she thinks on the question at hand?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My opinion is that makes no sense.That 's nice .
May I ask what your academic credentials are , and what research studies you 've published or been involved with that would make your opinion better informed than asking my cat what she thinks on the question at hand ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My opinion is that makes no sense.That's nice.
May I ask what your academic credentials are, and what research studies you've published or been involved with that would make your opinion better informed than asking my cat what she thinks on the question at hand?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729915</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731949</id>
	<title>Woohoo!</title>
	<author>tgd</author>
	<datestamp>1247854440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can I get it in a spray mister so I can just spray it into my basement and not worry about all that pesky radon?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I get it in a spray mister so I can just spray it into my basement and not worry about all that pesky radon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I get it in a spray mister so I can just spray it into my basement and not worry about all that pesky radon?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28735965</id>
	<title>Superpowers, here I come...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247831160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Give me a shot, and pass the nuclear waste...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Give me a shot , and pass the nuclear waste.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give me a shot, and pass the nuclear waste...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730709</id>
	<title>Re:Better Article &amp; 2008 Shareholder Report</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247849220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext> CBLI -  CLEVELAND BIOLABS INC   	Qty:  10000   	 Buy Market   	Current Price:  $4.38<br>
$50,000.00   	 $5,200.00(11.61 \%)  	 $5,200.00 (11.61 \%)<br>


thanks</htmltext>
<tokenext>CBLI - CLEVELAND BIOLABS INC Qty : 10000 Buy Market Current Price : $ 4.38 $ 50,000.00 $ 5,200.00 ( 11.61 \ % ) $ 5,200.00 ( 11.61 \ % ) thanks</tokentext>
<sentencetext> CBLI -  CLEVELAND BIOLABS INC   	Qty:  10000   	 Buy Market   	Current Price:  $4.38
$50,000.00   	 $5,200.00(11.61 \%)  	 $5,200.00 (11.61 \%)


thanks</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729483</id>
	<title>Re:I doubt it...</title>
	<author>cpricejones</author>
	<datestamp>1247844060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I echo this sentiment. DNA mutations are difficult to repair because the repair machinery itself makes mistakes. I.e., it's better for the cell to have a mutation than to die due to a double-strand break.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I echo this sentiment .
DNA mutations are difficult to repair because the repair machinery itself makes mistakes .
I.e. , it 's better for the cell to have a mutation than to die due to a double-strand break .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I echo this sentiment.
DNA mutations are difficult to repair because the repair machinery itself makes mistakes.
I.e., it's better for the cell to have a mutation than to die due to a double-strand break.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729907</id>
	<title>Re:That's silly</title>
	<author>woodix</author>
	<datestamp>1247845860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The primary kill vectors of an air burst nuclear strike are overpressure and initial radiation (there's a specific term for this but I can't recall what it is).  While the classic duck and cover drills of the cold war may have been more about calming the public than protecting the masses (or at least that's how we perceive it now) in some instances, duck and cover would be effective.  Depending on the distance from the blast something between you and the initial flash and pressure wave would be the difference between life and death--or at least death and survivable injury.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The primary kill vectors of an air burst nuclear strike are overpressure and initial radiation ( there 's a specific term for this but I ca n't recall what it is ) .
While the classic duck and cover drills of the cold war may have been more about calming the public than protecting the masses ( or at least that 's how we perceive it now ) in some instances , duck and cover would be effective .
Depending on the distance from the blast something between you and the initial flash and pressure wave would be the difference between life and death--or at least death and survivable injury .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The primary kill vectors of an air burst nuclear strike are overpressure and initial radiation (there's a specific term for this but I can't recall what it is).
While the classic duck and cover drills of the cold war may have been more about calming the public than protecting the masses (or at least that's how we perceive it now) in some instances, duck and cover would be effective.
Depending on the distance from the blast something between you and the initial flash and pressure wave would be the difference between life and death--or at least death and survivable injury.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729811</id>
	<title>Re:YNet isn't the only one who's picked it up..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247845440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't the same material. The substance made by the Israeli's is taken from a protein found in bacteria. The article you just brought up is one linked to a substance that is pulled from cancer cells.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't the same material .
The substance made by the Israeli 's is taken from a protein found in bacteria .
The article you just brought up is one linked to a substance that is pulled from cancer cells .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't the same material.
The substance made by the Israeli's is taken from a protein found in bacteria.
The article you just brought up is one linked to a substance that is pulled from cancer cells.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729413</id>
	<title>Re:RadAway</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247843760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just hope I don't get stuck in the vault with the puppets....</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just hope I do n't get stuck in the vault with the puppets... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just hope I don't get stuck in the vault with the puppets....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728899</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730989</id>
	<title>Re:Oh good,</title>
	<author>corbettw</author>
	<datestamp>1247850360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One of the arguments against the Strategic Defense Initiative (Star Wars) was that it actually increased the risk of a nuclear war.</p></div><p>No, it increased the <i>chances</i> of such a war. The risk, at least to the developer of the defense, was considerably lessened.</p><p>The problem with MAD is that it depends on rational decision makers on both sides of the equation. Throw in someone like Osama bin Laden or Kim Jong-Il and suddenly MAD doesn't make as much sense anymore and it's a good idea to have countermeasures to the attack.</p><p>It should also be noted that with sufficient defenses, it could also render the need for a nuclear arsenal (or at least one large enough to guarantee MAD) unnecessary. Unfortunately, the peaceniks who protested Star Wars in the 80s never focused on that element of the program.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the arguments against the Strategic Defense Initiative ( Star Wars ) was that it actually increased the risk of a nuclear war.No , it increased the chances of such a war .
The risk , at least to the developer of the defense , was considerably lessened.The problem with MAD is that it depends on rational decision makers on both sides of the equation .
Throw in someone like Osama bin Laden or Kim Jong-Il and suddenly MAD does n't make as much sense anymore and it 's a good idea to have countermeasures to the attack.It should also be noted that with sufficient defenses , it could also render the need for a nuclear arsenal ( or at least one large enough to guarantee MAD ) unnecessary .
Unfortunately , the peaceniks who protested Star Wars in the 80s never focused on that element of the program .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the arguments against the Strategic Defense Initiative (Star Wars) was that it actually increased the risk of a nuclear war.No, it increased the chances of such a war.
The risk, at least to the developer of the defense, was considerably lessened.The problem with MAD is that it depends on rational decision makers on both sides of the equation.
Throw in someone like Osama bin Laden or Kim Jong-Il and suddenly MAD doesn't make as much sense anymore and it's a good idea to have countermeasures to the attack.It should also be noted that with sufficient defenses, it could also render the need for a nuclear arsenal (or at least one large enough to guarantee MAD) unnecessary.
Unfortunately, the peaceniks who protested Star Wars in the 80s never focused on that element of the program.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729235</id>
	<title>Re:I need a car analogy...</title>
	<author>a\_nonamiss</author>
	<datestamp>1247842980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know this is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./, but seriously, RTFA. It's all in there.<br>
<br>
Yes, it would be an effective way to treat cancer. That's why it's being developed.<br>
No, it doesn't affect the cancer cells, too.<br>
In the studies, the potential to actually <b>cause</b> cancer is being investigated. In testing so far, it hasn't happened.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know this is ./ , but seriously , RTFA .
It 's all in there .
Yes , it would be an effective way to treat cancer .
That 's why it 's being developed .
No , it does n't affect the cancer cells , too .
In the studies , the potential to actually cause cancer is being investigated .
In testing so far , it has n't happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know this is ./, but seriously, RTFA.
It's all in there.
Yes, it would be an effective way to treat cancer.
That's why it's being developed.
No, it doesn't affect the cancer cells, too.
In the studies, the potential to actually cause cancer is being investigated.
In testing so far, it hasn't happened.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731877</id>
	<title>The actual scientific journal article abstract</title>
	<author>TheNarrator</author>
	<datestamp>1247854200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here's the journal article:

<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19539750" title="nih.gov">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19539750</a> [nih.gov]<blockquote><div><p>In conclusion, results of the study obviate that the apparent protective action of C(60)HyFn in vivo is determined by its considerable ability to decrease X-ray-generated reactive oxygen species. Based on the results and that neat C(60) is nontoxic, actually in the hydrated form, without side effects and with sufficient radioprotective effects in low doses, C(60)HyFn may be considered as a novel antioxidant agent, which substantially diminishes the harmful effects of ionizing radiation.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>

C(60) isn't that a fulerene/buckyball?  So this guy wants you to eat buckyballs?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's the journal article : http : //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19539750 [ nih.gov ] In conclusion , results of the study obviate that the apparent protective action of C ( 60 ) HyFn in vivo is determined by its considerable ability to decrease X-ray-generated reactive oxygen species .
Based on the results and that neat C ( 60 ) is nontoxic , actually in the hydrated form , without side effects and with sufficient radioprotective effects in low doses , C ( 60 ) HyFn may be considered as a novel antioxidant agent , which substantially diminishes the harmful effects of ionizing radiation .
C ( 60 ) is n't that a fulerene/buckyball ?
So this guy wants you to eat buckyballs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's the journal article:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19539750 [nih.gov]In conclusion, results of the study obviate that the apparent protective action of C(60)HyFn in vivo is determined by its considerable ability to decrease X-ray-generated reactive oxygen species.
Based on the results and that neat C(60) is nontoxic, actually in the hydrated form, without side effects and with sufficient radioprotective effects in low doses, C(60)HyFn may be considered as a novel antioxidant agent, which substantially diminishes the harmful effects of ionizing radiation.
C(60) isn't that a fulerene/buckyball?
So this guy wants you to eat buckyballs?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730797</id>
	<title>Re:I doubt it...</title>
	<author>mea37</author>
	<datestamp>1247849580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They claim some success treating before <i>or after</i> radiation exposure.</p><p>The thing is, it is a prevention/cure for <i>acute radiation sickness<i>, which is not the same thing as curing all possible symptoms of radiation damage.  If the cell's DNA is damaged, this does not correct it.  If you take this and then get hit with radiation that would damage the cell's DNA, this does not prevent it.</i></i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They claim some success treating before or after radiation exposure.The thing is , it is a prevention/cure for acute radiation sickness , which is not the same thing as curing all possible symptoms of radiation damage .
If the cell 's DNA is damaged , this does not correct it .
If you take this and then get hit with radiation that would damage the cell 's DNA , this does not prevent it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They claim some success treating before or after radiation exposure.The thing is, it is a prevention/cure for acute radiation sickness, which is not the same thing as curing all possible symptoms of radiation damage.
If the cell's DNA is damaged, this does not correct it.
If you take this and then get hit with radiation that would damage the cell's DNA, this does not prevent it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728907</id>
	<title>Finally</title>
	<author>BaseLineNL</author>
	<datestamp>1247841720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now I can throw away my tin foil hat!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I can throw away my tin foil hat !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I can throw away my tin foil hat!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729605</id>
	<title>Newbs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247844660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It already exists... It's called Rad-X... god.</p><p>Now I must return to the vault.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It already exists... It 's called Rad-X... god.Now I must return to the vault .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It already exists... It's called Rad-X... god.Now I must return to the vault.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728987</id>
	<title>Does it depend on the Jew genes?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247841960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm referring to the supposedly unique ones, advertised by the Israel eugenicists since the 60s, although there is little basis for them in reality.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm referring to the supposedly unique ones , advertised by the Israel eugenicists since the 60s , although there is little basis for them in reality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm referring to the supposedly unique ones, advertised by the Israel eugenicists since the 60s, although there is little basis for them in reality.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728881</id>
	<title>OMG!</title>
	<author>Flea of Pain</author>
	<datestamp>1247841600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Finally I can get my hands on some sweet, sweet, Radaway!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally I can get my hands on some sweet , sweet , Radaway !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally I can get my hands on some sweet, sweet, Radaway!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729753</id>
	<title>Hmm remeber reading</title>
	<author>Big Hairy Ian</author>
	<datestamp>1247845260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>about this in the Newscientist (I think) about 2 years ago so funny they say it was kept secret.  The article I recall was definitely talking about the same technique i.e. using a protein to stop cells from self destructing.  However if I recall the article stated that they only had it working in the stomach lining (which tracks slightly with this article) which would be good against the most common forms of radiation poisoning (ingestion).  This article seems to be saying that it's not just ingested radiation poisoning it protects against which is a big leap.  I can see applications for medicine, space travel and a whole host of other areas.  My only concern is it may remove one of the main reasons nuclear weapons haven't  been used in anger since the end ow WWII.  <br> <br>Appologies for not being able to find a link to the original paper</htmltext>
<tokenext>about this in the Newscientist ( I think ) about 2 years ago so funny they say it was kept secret .
The article I recall was definitely talking about the same technique i.e .
using a protein to stop cells from self destructing .
However if I recall the article stated that they only had it working in the stomach lining ( which tracks slightly with this article ) which would be good against the most common forms of radiation poisoning ( ingestion ) .
This article seems to be saying that it 's not just ingested radiation poisoning it protects against which is a big leap .
I can see applications for medicine , space travel and a whole host of other areas .
My only concern is it may remove one of the main reasons nuclear weapons have n't been used in anger since the end ow WWII .
Appologies for not being able to find a link to the original paper</tokentext>
<sentencetext>about this in the Newscientist (I think) about 2 years ago so funny they say it was kept secret.
The article I recall was definitely talking about the same technique i.e.
using a protein to stop cells from self destructing.
However if I recall the article stated that they only had it working in the stomach lining (which tracks slightly with this article) which would be good against the most common forms of radiation poisoning (ingestion).
This article seems to be saying that it's not just ingested radiation poisoning it protects against which is a big leap.
I can see applications for medicine, space travel and a whole host of other areas.
My only concern is it may remove one of the main reasons nuclear weapons haven't  been used in anger since the end ow WWII.
Appologies for not being able to find a link to the original paper</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729699</id>
	<title>Why do Jews outperform Africans?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247845080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This anti-radiation medicine developed by an ethnic Jew is truly amazing. It also begs the question: Why do ethnic Jews outperform ethnic Africans?
<p>
Faced with centuries of discrimination, Jews and, in particular, Ashkenazi Jews [economist.com] responded by working 20\% harder than the general population. Those who were very smart survived. Those who could not compete in these harsh conditions died. Over centuries, these evolutionary pressures significantly boosted Jewish intelligence.
</p><p>
In general, Europeans and Asians are the folks who migrated out of Africa to reach geographic endpoints: Poland, England, Russia, Japan, etc. The migration subjected these folks to harsh climatic conditions. Those who were sufficiently smart survived. Those who lacked adequate intelligence died. Over thousands of years, these evolutionary pressures significantly boosted European and Asian intelligence.
</p><p>
By contrast, Africans -- in their comfortable, warm environment that did not have any natural disasters -- did not endure any evolutionary pressures to boost intelligence.
</p><p>
Nearly 100\% of science and technology was developed by Europeans and Asians. A disproportionate share of the technical contributions was accomplished by Jews.
</p><p>
IQ tests consistently show that Jews and -- in particular -- Ashkenazi Jews are above average in intelligence. Ashkenazi Jews have the highest IQ among ethnic groups. The difference between Ashkenazi-Jewish IQ and typical European IQ is about 7 points.
</p><p>
By contrast, African IQ is about 15 points below European or Japanese IQ.
</p><p>
Note that IQ tests are not biased in favor of "Whites". The Japanese achieve the same IQ score that the Europeans achieve.
</p><p>
Clearly, the folks with the lowest intelligence are Africans. They accomplished almost nothing. Africa is a wasteland. If a European marries an African, then the European condemns her child to lower intelligence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This anti-radiation medicine developed by an ethnic Jew is truly amazing .
It also begs the question : Why do ethnic Jews outperform ethnic Africans ?
Faced with centuries of discrimination , Jews and , in particular , Ashkenazi Jews [ economist.com ] responded by working 20 \ % harder than the general population .
Those who were very smart survived .
Those who could not compete in these harsh conditions died .
Over centuries , these evolutionary pressures significantly boosted Jewish intelligence .
In general , Europeans and Asians are the folks who migrated out of Africa to reach geographic endpoints : Poland , England , Russia , Japan , etc .
The migration subjected these folks to harsh climatic conditions .
Those who were sufficiently smart survived .
Those who lacked adequate intelligence died .
Over thousands of years , these evolutionary pressures significantly boosted European and Asian intelligence .
By contrast , Africans -- in their comfortable , warm environment that did not have any natural disasters -- did not endure any evolutionary pressures to boost intelligence .
Nearly 100 \ % of science and technology was developed by Europeans and Asians .
A disproportionate share of the technical contributions was accomplished by Jews .
IQ tests consistently show that Jews and -- in particular -- Ashkenazi Jews are above average in intelligence .
Ashkenazi Jews have the highest IQ among ethnic groups .
The difference between Ashkenazi-Jewish IQ and typical European IQ is about 7 points .
By contrast , African IQ is about 15 points below European or Japanese IQ .
Note that IQ tests are not biased in favor of " Whites " .
The Japanese achieve the same IQ score that the Europeans achieve .
Clearly , the folks with the lowest intelligence are Africans .
They accomplished almost nothing .
Africa is a wasteland .
If a European marries an African , then the European condemns her child to lower intelligence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This anti-radiation medicine developed by an ethnic Jew is truly amazing.
It also begs the question: Why do ethnic Jews outperform ethnic Africans?
Faced with centuries of discrimination, Jews and, in particular, Ashkenazi Jews [economist.com] responded by working 20\% harder than the general population.
Those who were very smart survived.
Those who could not compete in these harsh conditions died.
Over centuries, these evolutionary pressures significantly boosted Jewish intelligence.
In general, Europeans and Asians are the folks who migrated out of Africa to reach geographic endpoints: Poland, England, Russia, Japan, etc.
The migration subjected these folks to harsh climatic conditions.
Those who were sufficiently smart survived.
Those who lacked adequate intelligence died.
Over thousands of years, these evolutionary pressures significantly boosted European and Asian intelligence.
By contrast, Africans -- in their comfortable, warm environment that did not have any natural disasters -- did not endure any evolutionary pressures to boost intelligence.
Nearly 100\% of science and technology was developed by Europeans and Asians.
A disproportionate share of the technical contributions was accomplished by Jews.
IQ tests consistently show that Jews and -- in particular -- Ashkenazi Jews are above average in intelligence.
Ashkenazi Jews have the highest IQ among ethnic groups.
The difference between Ashkenazi-Jewish IQ and typical European IQ is about 7 points.
By contrast, African IQ is about 15 points below European or Japanese IQ.
Note that IQ tests are not biased in favor of "Whites".
The Japanese achieve the same IQ score that the Europeans achieve.
Clearly, the folks with the lowest intelligence are Africans.
They accomplished almost nothing.
Africa is a wasteland.
If a European marries an African, then the European condemns her child to lower intelligence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731179</id>
	<title>Re:Suicidal cells</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247851020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quick, you've got an acute case of radiation poisoning. Do you:</p><p>a) Take this (assuming the research works out) and risk getting ZOMG TEH CANCER, or<br>b) Die in the next couple of hours from radiation sickness, as your cells commit mass suicide and your organs shut down.</p><p>I think the choice is obvious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quick , you 've got an acute case of radiation poisoning .
Do you : a ) Take this ( assuming the research works out ) and risk getting ZOMG TEH CANCER , orb ) Die in the next couple of hours from radiation sickness , as your cells commit mass suicide and your organs shut down.I think the choice is obvious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quick, you've got an acute case of radiation poisoning.
Do you:a) Take this (assuming the research works out) and risk getting ZOMG TEH CANCER, orb) Die in the next couple of hours from radiation sickness, as your cells commit mass suicide and your organs shut down.I think the choice is obvious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728997</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728997</id>
	<title>Suicidal cells</title>
	<author>Antidamage</author>
	<datestamp>1247842020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The medication works by suppressing the "suicide mechanism" of cells hit by radiation, while enabling them to recover from the radiation-induced damages that prompted them to activate the suicide mechanism in the first place."</p><p>So it turns the cell into a cry for attention?</p><p>Seriously though, saving cells damaged by radiation sounds like a shortcut to cancer. Is the claim of 'enabling cells to recover' realistic?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The medication works by suppressing the " suicide mechanism " of cells hit by radiation , while enabling them to recover from the radiation-induced damages that prompted them to activate the suicide mechanism in the first place .
" So it turns the cell into a cry for attention ? Seriously though , saving cells damaged by radiation sounds like a shortcut to cancer .
Is the claim of 'enabling cells to recover ' realistic ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The medication works by suppressing the "suicide mechanism" of cells hit by radiation, while enabling them to recover from the radiation-induced damages that prompted them to activate the suicide mechanism in the first place.
"So it turns the cell into a cry for attention?Seriously though, saving cells damaged by radiation sounds like a shortcut to cancer.
Is the claim of 'enabling cells to recover' realistic?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729671</id>
	<title>Re:Oh good,</title>
	<author>TheHawke</author>
	<datestamp>1247844960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's one of the things with finding and deploying cures for the effects of a nuclear event. It might have the effect of removing the political aspect of using nuclear weapons, to actually encouraging terrorists to actually deploy IND or the Real Thing.</p><p>This would help people, but what would clean up the contamination of the surrounding environment aside from dozers and dump trucks?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's one of the things with finding and deploying cures for the effects of a nuclear event .
It might have the effect of removing the political aspect of using nuclear weapons , to actually encouraging terrorists to actually deploy IND or the Real Thing.This would help people , but what would clean up the contamination of the surrounding environment aside from dozers and dump trucks ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's one of the things with finding and deploying cures for the effects of a nuclear event.
It might have the effect of removing the political aspect of using nuclear weapons, to actually encouraging terrorists to actually deploy IND or the Real Thing.This would help people, but what would clean up the contamination of the surrounding environment aside from dozers and dump trucks?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913</id>
	<title>I doubt it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247841720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No publication in a real scientific or medical journal.</p><p>Further, radiation sickness is difficult to fix. You've got alpha, beta &amp; gamma particles bombarding cells, causing damage all over the place. Chemical bonds are broken, energy is added, and new chemical bonds form.</p><p>I really doubt a magic bullet can exist for the many types of cellular damage that can occur in different body systems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No publication in a real scientific or medical journal.Further , radiation sickness is difficult to fix .
You 've got alpha , beta &amp; gamma particles bombarding cells , causing damage all over the place .
Chemical bonds are broken , energy is added , and new chemical bonds form.I really doubt a magic bullet can exist for the many types of cellular damage that can occur in different body systems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No publication in a real scientific or medical journal.Further, radiation sickness is difficult to fix.
You've got alpha, beta &amp; gamma particles bombarding cells, causing damage all over the place.
Chemical bonds are broken, energy is added, and new chemical bonds form.I really doubt a magic bullet can exist for the many types of cellular damage that can occur in different body systems.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729639</id>
	<title>Poor Summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247844780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The way the summary reads makes it sound like we are almost prepared for when the cylons take over.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The way the summary reads makes it sound like we are almost prepared for when the cylons take over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The way the summary reads makes it sound like we are almost prepared for when the cylons take over.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730371</id>
	<title>Re:Why do Jews outperform Africans?</title>
	<author>sonicmerlin</author>
	<datestamp>1247847780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Um...the Japanese score higher on IQ than whites.  Asians in general have higher IQs than Europeans.

Ashkenazi Jews *do* have the highest overall IQs, however this doesn't take into account other measures of intelligence, like "EQ", a relatively recently created measure of one's "emotional quotient".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Um...the Japanese score higher on IQ than whites .
Asians in general have higher IQs than Europeans .
Ashkenazi Jews * do * have the highest overall IQs , however this does n't take into account other measures of intelligence , like " EQ " , a relatively recently created measure of one 's " emotional quotient " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um...the Japanese score higher on IQ than whites.
Asians in general have higher IQs than Europeans.
Ashkenazi Jews *do* have the highest overall IQs, however this doesn't take into account other measures of intelligence, like "EQ", a relatively recently created measure of one's "emotional quotient".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729469</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732525</id>
	<title>Cures radiation sickness, but causes sterility</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247856900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cures radiation sickness, but causes sterility<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>Not the first side effect tested, I'd bet.</p><p>Dr. Crusher will be happy if this is true.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cures radiation sickness , but causes sterility ...Not the first side effect tested , I 'd bet.Dr .
Crusher will be happy if this is true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cures radiation sickness, but causes sterility ...Not the first side effect tested, I'd bet.Dr.
Crusher will be happy if this is true.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729787</id>
	<title>Re:I doubt it...</title>
	<author>buchner.johannes</author>
	<datestamp>1247845320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I really doubt a magic bullet can exist</p></div><p>What about lightyears thick walls of lead, huh?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really doubt a magic bullet can existWhat about lightyears thick walls of lead , huh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really doubt a magic bullet can existWhat about lightyears thick walls of lead, huh?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729469</id>
	<title>Why do Jews outperform Africans?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247844000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This anti-radiation medicine is truly amazing. It also begs the question:  Why do ethnic Jews outperform ethnic Africans?
<p>
Faced with centuries of discrimination, Jews and, in particular, <a href="http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story\_id=4032638" title="economist.com" rel="nofollow">Ashkenazi Jews</a> [economist.com] responded by working 20\% harder than the general population.  Those who were very smart survived.  Those who could not compete in these harsh conditions died.  Over centuries, these evolutionary pressures significantly boosted Jewish intelligence.
</p><p>
In general, Europeans and Asians are the folks who migrated out of Africa to reach geographic endpoints:  Poland, England, Russia, Japan, etc.  The migration subjected these folks to harsh climatic conditions.  Those who were sufficiently smart survived.  Those who lacked adequate intelligence died.  Over thousands of years, these evolutionary pressures significantly boosted European and Asian intelligence.
</p><p>
By contrast, Africans -- in their comfortable, warm environment that did not have any natural disasters -- did not endure any evolutionary pressures to boost intelligence.
</p><p>
Nearly 100\% of science and technology was developed by Europeans and Asians.  A disproportionate share of the technical contributions were accomplished by Jews.
</p><p>
IQ tests consistently show that Jews and -- in particular -- Ashkenazi Jews are above average in intelligence.  Ashkenazi Jews have the highest IQ among ethnic groups.  The difference between Ashkenazi-Jewish IQ and typical European IQ is about 7 points.
</p><p>
By contrast, African IQ is about 15 points below European or Japanese IQ.
</p><p>
Note that IQ tests are not biased in favor of "Whites".  The Japanese achieve the same IQ score that the Europeans achieve.
</p><p>
Clearly, the folks with the lowest intelligence are Africans.  They accomplished almost nothing.  Africa is a wasteland.  If a European marries an African, then the European condemns her child to lower intelligence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This anti-radiation medicine is truly amazing .
It also begs the question : Why do ethnic Jews outperform ethnic Africans ?
Faced with centuries of discrimination , Jews and , in particular , Ashkenazi Jews [ economist.com ] responded by working 20 \ % harder than the general population .
Those who were very smart survived .
Those who could not compete in these harsh conditions died .
Over centuries , these evolutionary pressures significantly boosted Jewish intelligence .
In general , Europeans and Asians are the folks who migrated out of Africa to reach geographic endpoints : Poland , England , Russia , Japan , etc .
The migration subjected these folks to harsh climatic conditions .
Those who were sufficiently smart survived .
Those who lacked adequate intelligence died .
Over thousands of years , these evolutionary pressures significantly boosted European and Asian intelligence .
By contrast , Africans -- in their comfortable , warm environment that did not have any natural disasters -- did not endure any evolutionary pressures to boost intelligence .
Nearly 100 \ % of science and technology was developed by Europeans and Asians .
A disproportionate share of the technical contributions were accomplished by Jews .
IQ tests consistently show that Jews and -- in particular -- Ashkenazi Jews are above average in intelligence .
Ashkenazi Jews have the highest IQ among ethnic groups .
The difference between Ashkenazi-Jewish IQ and typical European IQ is about 7 points .
By contrast , African IQ is about 15 points below European or Japanese IQ .
Note that IQ tests are not biased in favor of " Whites " .
The Japanese achieve the same IQ score that the Europeans achieve .
Clearly , the folks with the lowest intelligence are Africans .
They accomplished almost nothing .
Africa is a wasteland .
If a European marries an African , then the European condemns her child to lower intelligence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This anti-radiation medicine is truly amazing.
It also begs the question:  Why do ethnic Jews outperform ethnic Africans?
Faced with centuries of discrimination, Jews and, in particular, Ashkenazi Jews [economist.com] responded by working 20\% harder than the general population.
Those who were very smart survived.
Those who could not compete in these harsh conditions died.
Over centuries, these evolutionary pressures significantly boosted Jewish intelligence.
In general, Europeans and Asians are the folks who migrated out of Africa to reach geographic endpoints:  Poland, England, Russia, Japan, etc.
The migration subjected these folks to harsh climatic conditions.
Those who were sufficiently smart survived.
Those who lacked adequate intelligence died.
Over thousands of years, these evolutionary pressures significantly boosted European and Asian intelligence.
By contrast, Africans -- in their comfortable, warm environment that did not have any natural disasters -- did not endure any evolutionary pressures to boost intelligence.
Nearly 100\% of science and technology was developed by Europeans and Asians.
A disproportionate share of the technical contributions were accomplished by Jews.
IQ tests consistently show that Jews and -- in particular -- Ashkenazi Jews are above average in intelligence.
Ashkenazi Jews have the highest IQ among ethnic groups.
The difference between Ashkenazi-Jewish IQ and typical European IQ is about 7 points.
By contrast, African IQ is about 15 points below European or Japanese IQ.
Note that IQ tests are not biased in favor of "Whites".
The Japanese achieve the same IQ score that the Europeans achieve.
Clearly, the folks with the lowest intelligence are Africans.
They accomplished almost nothing.
Africa is a wasteland.
If a European marries an African, then the European condemns her child to lower intelligence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728881</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731431
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729409
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731981
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729235
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729861
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729081
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729435
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731933
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729907
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730709
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729469
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729567
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729631
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729081
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28740783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731049
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729581
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731231
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28735497
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728949
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28736245
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28737909
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731941
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728949
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730989
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729499
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728949
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730741
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729537
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28734179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729409
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732683
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732319
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28733935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730619
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28733193
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729409
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732577
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732349
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729937
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729273
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732065
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729581
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28734709
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28739503
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729581
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729081
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729435
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728949
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731287
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729235
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730633
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731839
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729599
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28735745
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28733169
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728949
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729321
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731401
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729005
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730063
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729647
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729971
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728949
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732843
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731615
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28736019
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728899
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729413
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731923
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728985
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729645
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729427
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728949
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729709
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730967
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729723
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729699
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731423
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729409
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28735031
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729483
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729581
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729643
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729641
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729787
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28738027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729321
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731237
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729409
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732059
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729273
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731039
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732955
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729581
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731231
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28735133
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28733417
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729215
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729081
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729081
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730797
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729273
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729799
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731425
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1231204_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729469
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730371
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729921
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728945
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730063
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729907
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729599
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28735745
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728907
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728963
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729215
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731425
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729643
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730709
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729537
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729379
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729723
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28733169
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728933
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729143
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729427
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729409
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732059
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732683
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732577
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731981
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28735031
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728883
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731507
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28739503
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729699
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729811
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731941
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729789
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729915
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732349
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732681
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28733417
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731139
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28736019
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729581
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731231
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28735133
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28735497
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28734709
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731165
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731419
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732319
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729461
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28738027
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729275
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730229
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728977
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729861
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731965
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729747
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729081
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729991
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28740783
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732045
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729435
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731933
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732531
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730263
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728923
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729235
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730633
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729575
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28734179
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729005
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728985
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729645
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729351
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728913
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729787
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731839
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729641
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729499
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732283
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729483
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729051
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28733935
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28737909
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730071
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730797
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729631
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730619
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730671
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729321
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731401
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731237
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728899
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729413
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731923
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729429
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728949
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729709
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729755
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731287
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730989
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732843
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730741
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28736245
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730353
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729837
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728997
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731179
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729647
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729971
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731423
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729937
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729273
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28732065
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729799
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731039
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1231204.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28728881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730967
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729015
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731615
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729469
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28729567
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28730371
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28731431
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1231204.28733193
</commentlist>
</conversation>
